(k) The President-elect of the Commission shall present the whole college of Commissioners at a sitting of
Parliament. The presentation will be followed by a debate. In order to wind up the debate, any politicalgroup or at least 37 Members may table a motion for resolution. Following the vote on the motion forresolution, Parliament will then vote on whether or not to give its consent to the appointment as abody of the President and other members of the Commission. Parliament shall decide by a majority ofthe votes cast, by roll call. It may defer the vote until the next sitting;
2. Adopts the following arrangements in the event of a change in the composition or disposition of the
Commission during its term of office:
(a) When a vacancy caused by resignation, compulsory retirement or death is to be filled, Parliament,
acting with dispatch, shall invite the candidate for the Commission to participate in a hearing underthe same conditions as those laid down in paragraph 1.
(b) In the event of the accession of a new Member State, Parliament shall invite its Commissioner-designate
to participate in a hearing under the same conditions as those laid down in paragraph 1.
(c) In the event of a substantial reshuffle of portfolios, the Commissioners affected will be invited to appear
before the appropriate parliamentary committees before taking up their new responsibilities;
3. In order to facilitate the preparation of the approval process of the Commission, requests the Council
to bring forward the period of the next parliamentary elections from June to May 2009;
4. Instructs its President to refer this resolution to the Committee responsible for the Rules of Procedure
with a view to proposing appropriate amendments to the Rules in good time before the next parliamentaryelections;
5. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the European Council and the
Council.
P6_TA(2005)0466
Applying competition rules to maritime transport
European Parliament resolution on the application of EC competition rules to maritime transport
(2005/2033(INI))
The European Parliament ,
— having regard to Articles 80, 81, 82, 83, 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty,
— having regard to the White Paper on the review of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86, applying the EC
competition rules to maritime transport (COM(2004)0675),
— having regard to the White Paper “European Transport Policy for 2010: time to decide ”(COM(2001)
0370),
— having regard to the conclusions of the Presidency of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March
2000 asking the Commission 'to speed up liberalisation in areas such as gas, electricity, postal servicesand transport',
— having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 954/79 (
1), which contains a framework for applying the
Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences so as to be compatible with the EC Treaty,
— having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 of 22 December 1986 laying down detailed
rules for the application of Articles 85 and 86 (now Articles 81 and 82) of the Treaty to maritimetransport (
2),
(1) OJ L 121, 17.5.1979, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 378, 31.12.1986, p. 4.22.11.2006 MT C 285 E/139 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 1 ta' Di ċembru 2005
— having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December 1992 applying the principle of
freedom to provide services to maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage) (1),
— having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 823/2000 of 19 April 2000 on the application of
Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices bet-ween liner shipping companies (consortia) (
2),
— having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of
the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (3),
— having regard to the Commission discussion paper of 13 July 2005 on the review of Regulation (EEC)
No 4056/86,
— having regard to the final report of the “Economic Assistance Study on Liner Shipping ”conducted by
ICF Consulting on behalf of the Commission's Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, publishedin May 2005,
— having regard to the study “The application of competition rules to liner shipping ”carried out by
Global Insight on behalf of the Commission's Competition Directorate-General and released on8 November 2005,
— having regard to the Commission consultation paper of 27 March 2003 on the review of Regulation
(EEC) No 4056/86,
— having regard to the Opinions of the European Economic and Social Committee (
4) and of the Com-
mittee of the Regions (5) on the White Paper on the review of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86,
— having regard to the Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences of the United Nations Conference on Trade
and Development, 1974,
— having regard to the report of the Secretariat of the OECD “Competition Policy in Liner Shipping ”of
16 April 2002,
— having regard to the letter of the European Liner Affairs Association (ELAA) headed “Review of Regu-
lation (EEC) No 4056/86: Proposal for a new Regulatory Structure ”of 6 August 2004,
— having regard to the report from the Erasmus University of Rotterdam of 12 November 2003 concer-
ning the assistance it provided in processing the submissions received relating to the Commissionconsultation paper on the review of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86,
— having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0314/2005),
A. whereas European shipping is a sector which is constantly developing and operates in a particularly
globalised and competitive market characterised by new forms of cooperation, mergers and allianceswhich are constantly transforming the circumstances and conditions of the market in maritime trans-port, and whereas there is a tendency towards concentrations in a number of large shipping companies,
B. whereas maritime transport has so far fallen into two major categories: (a) the liner services market,
i.e. scheduled services and (b) the market in international tramp vessel services, i.e. non-scheduledservices, and whereas the first category of liner services has since 1875 been organised according tothe system of liner conferences, while the second category operates in a non-scheduled manner and
freight rates are freely negotiated according to supply and demand,
(1) OJ L 364, 12.12.1992, p. 7.
(2) OJ L 100, 20.4.2000, p. 24.
(3) OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.
(4) OJ C 157, 28.6.2005, p. 130.
(5) OJ C 231, 20.9.2005, p. 38.C 285 E/140 MT 22.11.2006 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 1 ta' Di ċembru 2005
C. whereas the stabilising role of conferences was recognised in the Code of Conduct for Liner Conferen-
ces of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,
D. whereas Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 exempted conferences from the rules of competition policy
(Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty), but allowed free trade, which means that substantive competitionfrom outsiders is ensured, while international tramp vessel services and cabotage services (maritimetransport services that take place exclusively between ports in one and the same Member State) areexcluded from the Community competition implementing rules (Regulation (EC) No 1/2003),
E. whereas other forms of cooperation are already appearing, such as consortia of liner shipping compa-
nies, which are also the subject of a block exemption (Regulation (EC) No 823/2000, which has beenamended, inter alia by Regulation (EC) No 611/2005 (
1)); whereas, however, their scope is different
because reference rates cannot be set under the regulation,
F. whereas the exemption for liner conferences which has been in effect for the last nineteen years has
played a significant regulatory role in the development of international trade, and the present confe-rence regime appears much more “liberal ”than in the past, while retaining the advantages of providing
reliable liner services at competitive rates,
G. whereas over the period 1997-2004 there was a remarkable increase in the volume of international
trade handled by major liner conference systems and a significant increase in the volume of such trade
handled by minor conference systems (with some fluctuations),
H. whereas, as regards the review of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86, the Commission concludes that:
(a) there is no further justification for exempting liner shipping conferences,(b) there is no justification for the exclusion of tramp services and cabotage from the competition
implementing rules,
(c) there is no valid reason for maintaining the provisions for technical agreements or the conflict of
laws provision and proposes that they be abolished;
I. whereas a majority of the parties involved is in favour of a review of the existing regime with a view to
achieving price stability, effective, high-quality services and the continued competitiveness of liner ship-
ping companies and small and medium-sized shipping companies,
J. whereas an impact study was carried out by consulting firm Global Insight, on the Commission's
initiative, with a view to assessing the consequences which might ensue if the block exemption forliner conferences provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 were to be repealed and replaced witha system based on the alternative proposal put forward by the ELAA;
General
1. Calls upon the Commission and all parties concerned to understand that the purpose of the review of
Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 should be to preserve, and promote the expansion of, a viable and competi-tive European shipping sector within the framework of the Lisbon Strategy in conjunction with transportpolicy strategy, as summarised in the White Paper and the Marco Polo I and the Marco Polo II programmes,and that it is vital to do so especially in view of the fact that new maritime powers have emerged, namelyChina, South Korea, and Taiwan;
2. Calls upon the Commission carefully to consider the consequences of a possible alternative system for
the entire marine transport sector, namely members and non-members of liner conferences and their com-petitors (independent bodies) their customers (shippers) and the final consumers;
(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 611/2005 of 20 April 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 823/2000 on the
application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices
between liner shipping companies (consortia) (OJ L 101, 21.4.2005, p. 10).22.11.2006 MT C 285 E/141 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 1 ta' Di ċembru 2005
3. Notes that the conclusions of the study by Global Insight do not provide a solid basis for abolishing
the block exemption for maritime conferences, as the shortcomings outlined in previous studies in terms ofscope and data were not really dealt with in this latest study either; calls upon the Commission to take thisinto consideration in the framework of its new proposal and to discuss it with the circles concerned, withParliament and with the Council;
4. Calls upon the Commission, in the event of amendment of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86, to bear in
mind existing legal and operating regimes in other countries (USA, Australia, Japan and Canada), since anymisalignment of the European system in relation to those regimes might create destabilising socio-economiceffects worldwide and lead to protectionist measures;
5. Emphasises the likelihood of adverse consequences in the event of a general overhaul of the system,
not so much for large merchant shipping lines, but rather for small and medium-sized ones, and emphasisesalso that there is no evidence that the abolition of liner conferences will bring about a fall in prices;
6. Notes that full liberalisation involving the abolition of the exemptions for liner conferences provided
for in Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 will necessitate corresponding changes to Regulation (EC) No 823/2000, which was itself amended by Regulation (EC) No 611/2005, which provides for block exemptionsfor consortia of liner shipping companies;·
7. Maintains that any regulation in the sector will need to allow for the nature of regions affected by
specific constraints, for example regions of the type described in Article 299(2) of the Treaty, which depend
on the continued provision of services with special characteristics;
8. Underscores, as far as they comply with Community competition law, the importance of an increasing
number of forms of cooperation, such as framework agreements, by virtue of which carriers, whether or notthey are members of conferences, are able flexibly to coordinate their competitive conduct on the market inrelation to freight rates and other service conditions;
Liner conferences
9. Concludes, on the basis of the case-law of the Court of First Instance (Joined Cases T-191/98, T-212/
98 to T-214/98 Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v. Commission (
1),“the TACA case ”), that the regu-
lation of vessel capacity is permissible only if no artificial demand is created along with increases in freightrates and only if the power of conferences to fix freight rates has been significantly limited, the four cumu-lative conditions laid down in Article 81(3) of the Treaty thus being fulfilled, if only partially;
10. Points out that while Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 endorses the system of closed conferences, it also
allows free trade, which means that substantive competition from outsiders is ensured and that no furtherrestrictions on competition from liner conferences is permitted;
11. Supports the Commission's intention to review —rather than repeal —Regulation (EEC) No 4056/
86 with a view to ensuring compatibility with the rules of competition, chiefly by excluding the possibilityof a direct fixing of freight prices and by authorising the fixing by the conferences of a reference price or aprice index under an alternative system, in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Justice,and by ensuring that surcharges and associated costs are calculated transparently and after dialogue withshippers, and stresses that any such review must safeguard the stability of freight rates, the high quality ofservices and sound competition for all enterprises, whatever their size;
12. Takes the view that the proposal of the ELAA contains interesting points, including the introduction
of a price index and the creation of discussion forums for carriers, shippers and other industry players,which should be taken up by the Commission, pursuant to competition rules, in drafting any amendingregulation, and that any such new regulation might be made to come into force for a limited period of fiveyears after the expiry of which an assessment would be carried out; takes the view that the Commissionshould examine the compliance of these points with the four cumulative conditions laid down in Ar-ticle 81 (3) of the Treaty;
(1) ECR [2003] II-3275.C 285 E/142 MT 22.11.2006 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 1 ta' Di ċembru 2005
13. Considers that, whichever alternative solution is chosen, a transitional period should be envisaged to
enable all operators (carriers, shippers and other industry players) to adapt to the new regulatory framework;
14. Calls upon the Commission, within its terms of reference and on the basis of undertakings under the
Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences to hold discussions with the other contracting parties before pro-
posing amendment or repeal of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86; believes that those discussions should seekto find the most appropriate method of adaptation for Member States (those than still have bilateral com-mitments under the Code of Conduct) to the possible new legal status, with a view to avoiding any adverseconsequences;
International tramp vessel and cabotage services
15. Points out that the tramp sector remains overwhelmingly deregulated and operates on the basis of
the rules of fair competition; supports the Commission proposal for these services to be brought within thescope of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003;
16. Considers it to be in the interests of legal certainty and clarity that the Commission should establish,
in a single process, guidelines as regards the compatibility of bulk pools and specialised trades with the rulesof competition, subject to the proviso, however, that it should not do so until the proposals have beenpublished and consultations held with the circles concerned;
17. Points out that the cabotage services sector has already been deregulated pursuant to Regulation (EEC)
No 3577/92; takes the view that given that these services are carried out between ports in one and the sameMember State, intra-Community trade between the Member States is not affected (Articles 81 and 82 of theTreaty) and consequently there is no need or legal obligation for this sector to be brought within the scopeof Regulation (EC) No 1/2003;
Purely technical agreements
18. Calls upon the Commission not to continue with the proposal to abolish the arrangements contained
in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 governing the legality of technical agreements, since it believesthat retaining a purely legal framework governing technical agreements will contribute to legal certainty anda better orientation for service providers;
Conflict of laws
19. Calls upon the Commission not to continue with the proposal to repeal Article 9 of Regulation (EEC)
No 4056/86 which provides for negotiations to be held in the event of a conflict between Community lawand the law of third countries, especially in view of the Commission's intention to revise competition lawrelating to maritime transport;
*
**
20. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
P6_TA(2005)0467
Electronic communications
European Parliament resolution on European electronic communications regulation and markets
2004 (2005/2052(INI))
The European Parliament ,
— having regard to the communication from the Commission, entitled “European Electronic Communica-
tions Regulation and Markets 2004 ”(COM(2004)0759),
— having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 22 and 23 March
2005,22.11.2006 MT C 285 E/143 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 1 ta' Di ċembru 2005