Article 2
1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to
comply with this Directive by…(*). They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
When Member States adopt those measures , they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompa-
nied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference
shall be laid down by Member States .
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the main provisions of national law which they
adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Article 3
This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal
of the European Union.
It shall apply from …(**).
This Directive is addressed to the Member States.
Done at …,o n …
For the European Parliament
The PresidentFor the Council
The President
(*)60 days after the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No …/…[concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and
restriction of chemicals].
(**)18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive.
P6_TA(2005)0436
Arms exports
European Parliament resolution on the Council's Sixth Annual Report according to Operative Pro-
vision 8 of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports (2005/2013(INI))
The European Parliament ,
— having regard to the Council's Sixth Annual Report adopted on 11 November 2004 (1),
— having regard to the updated User's Guide to the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports,
as agreed by the Council Working Party on Conventional Arms Exports (COARM) on 23 December
2004 (2),
— having regard to Council Common Position 2003/468/CFSP of 23 June 2003 on the control of arms
brokering (3),
(1) OJ C 316, 21.12.2004, p. 1.
(2) Council document 16133/1/04, 23.12.2004, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 156, 25.6.2003, p. 79.18.11.2006 MT C 280 E/443 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 17 ta' Novembru 2005
— having regard to the Common Military List of the European Union (equipment covered by the EU Code
of Conduct on Arms Exports) adopted by the Council on 25 April 2005 (1),
— having regard to the Council Joint Action 2002/589/CFSP of 12 July 2002 on the European Union's
contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light wea-
pons (2),
— having regard to the 1997 EU Programme for Preventing and Combating Illicit Trafficking in Conven-
tional Arms,
— having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1504/2004 of 19 July 2004 amending and updating
Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual-useitems and technology (
3),
— having regard to the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use
Goods and Technologies,
— having regard to the European Security Strategy adopted by the Council on 12 December 2003,
— having regard to the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (4),
— having regard to its resolution of 17 November 2004 on the Council's Fifth Annual Report according
to Operative Provision 8 of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports (5),
— having regard to its resolution of 3 July 2003 on trafficking in children and child soldiers (6),
— having regard to its resolution of 26 May 2005 on small arms and light weapons (7),
— having regard to its resolutions on the non-removal of the EU embargo on arms sales to China, and in
particular its resolution of 18 December 2003 (8),
— having regard to its annual resolutions on human rights in the world and the European Union's policy
on the matter, and in particular its resolution of 22 April 2004 (9),
— having regard to Article 17 of the EU Treaty and Article 296 of the EC Treaty,
— having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Opinion of the Committee on
Development (A6-0292/2005),
A. whereas although the recent year-long review of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports will serve
to strengthen EU export controls, there are still further measures to be undertaken,
B. whereas the European Union, in light of the threats outlined in the European Security Strategy, should
make every effort to act, and be seen as acting, as a responsible global actor at the forefront of effortsto combat proliferation, foster global disarmament and develop arms transfer controls,
(1) OJ C 127, 25.5.2005, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 191, 19.7.2002, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 281, 31.8.2004, p. 1.
(4) Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, adopted by the First United Nations Congress on the
Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, held at Geneva in 1955, and approved by the Economic and
Social Council by its resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977.
(5) OJ C 201 E, 18.8.2005, p. 71.
(6) OJ C 74 E, 24.3.2004, p. 854.
(7) Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0204.
(8) OJ C 91 E, 15.4.2004, p. 679.
(9) OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p. 1048.C 280 E/444 MT 18.11.2006 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 17 ta' Novembru 2005
C. whereas the transformation of the EU Code of Conduct into a Common Position appears likely, which
would be a significant step forward in the development of the Code, requiring Member States to aligntheir national legislation with the standards set by the EU Code, and whereas, to that end, Coreper on30 June 2005 reached agreement on a revised Code of Conduct (to be adopted in the form of aCommon Position) at the appropriate juncture,
D. whereas although developments in arms transfer controls continue to move forward, for example
increased support towards the Arms Trade Treaty, such developments continue to require the full sup-port of the EU, and whereas, to that end, full backing is given to the Council conclusions dated3 October 2005 stating EU support for the principle of an international treaty on arms trade,
E. whereas every year some half a million people die as a result of small-arms violence, both in the course
of armed conflicts and in connection with crime,
F. convinced that the development and implementation of a harmonised European arms export control
policy would contribute decisively to a deepening of the Union's Common Foreign and Security Policy,
G. whereas the unrestrained proliferation of arms exports both poses a threat to human life and broader
socio-economic development and also undermines the EU's development cooperation policy and thusthe Millennium Development Goals,
H. convinced that any EU arms export control policy must reinforce and complement the other dimen-
sions of the Union's external action, which include the goals of sustainable development, crisis preven-tion and promotion of human rights,
I. whereas, as has recently been reported, the four major European arms suppliers have significantly
increased their share of arms transfer agreements to developing nations from USD 830 million in2003 (5,5 %) to USD 4,8 billion in 2004 (22 %),
1. Welcomes the Council's Sixth Annual Report and reiterates the importance of annual reviews, as
prescribed by Operative Provision 8 of the Code, as the main mechanism for reviewing and strengthening
the Code;
2. Welcomes the opportunity to provide a development perspective on arms export controls and takes
the opportunity to stress the relevance of arms exports to European Union development cooperation policy;
3. Regrets that the review has not gone further to develop clear criteria, and calls for substantial impro-
vements in the level of detail for the criteria; calls for the Code to become legally binding, and urges theCouncil not to further delay its decision on the legally binding nature of the Code; takes note that on26 September 2005 best practices for interpretation of Criterion 8 were agreed unopposed by theCOARM Working Party and hopes these will be included in the next revised version of the User's Guide;
4. Is deeply concerned by recent cases in the EU relating to transfers of production facilities overseas,
including licensed production deals, and regrets that this area was not addressed more substantially in thecourse of the review; reiterates that an operative provision is needed which regulates the manufacture,quantity and export of finished goods produced in facilities overseas and that the Common Position shouldset a deadline both for the drawing-up and for the entry into force of that provision; notes that the revisedCode of Conduct (to be adopted in the form of a Common Position) will state that applications for licensedproduction overseas are to be assessed against the criteria of the Common Position;
5. Reaffirms the need to improve the denial notification system that was not addressed by the review;
calls again for greater exchange of information on bilateral consultation on denials and for greater use ofmultilateral EU-wide consultation on denials;18.11.2006 MT C 280 E/445 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 17 ta' Novembru 2005
6. Reiterates its call for Member States to agree on a list of countries involved in armed conflicts to
which arms exports should be banned in principle, drawing upon the reports and recommendations ofthe UN Security Council monitoring mechanisms on arms embargoes;
7. Calls for the establishment of a European dialogue between the leaders of the authorising bodies of the
Member States, taking into account the situation assessments by the European Situation Centre;
Common Position
8. Welcomes the prospect of the Code becoming a Common Position; underlines that this should not
restrict Member States' freedom of action to negotiate other international and regional measures on armsexport controls; regrets, however, that this still has not happened, and calls on the Member States to makethe Code legally binding;
9. Considers that a clear, efficient and harmonised common arms control export policy, anchored in a
legally binding Code of Conduct, can play a decisive role in the fight against terrorism, conflict prevention,regional stability and the promotion of human rights;
Temporary measures upon lifting an arms embargo
10. Welcomes the introduction of a “toolbox ”and specific mechanisms to regulate arms exports to post –
embargoed states; considers that thorough monitoring is necessary even after the embargo has been lifted;considers that a review mechanism should be set up to assess and revise the toolbox if necessary; urgesCOARM to review the mechanism on a regular basis and to report on such discussions to the EuropeanParliament;
11. Regards it as important that Member States should have the opportunity to consult each other on the
licences issued for exports to post-embargoed states; additionally calls for the substance and outcomes ofconsultations to be circulated to all Member States;
12. Stresses the importance of sharing information with the European Parliament, on licence approvals
and the toolbox's modus operandi; regrets that no dialogue with the European Parliament has taken place inthis regard;
Equal criteria
13. Urges the Member States to apply equal criteria to the evaluation of third states when considering
any restriction or embargo on arms exports on account of human rights violations or growing regionalinstability; in the light of this, the embargo on China should not be lifted until there is a clear and sustainedimprovement in the situation as regards human rights and civil and political freedoms in the country and
until the Tiananmen issue has been properly addressed; is also concerned that arms exports will increase the
risk of regional instability in East Asia, particularly in the light of China's recent anti-secession law aimed atTaiwan; urges China to take concrete steps to improve the human rights situation in the country, forexample by ratifying the International Covenant on Political and Civil Rights and allowing the InternationalCommittee of the Red Cross to carry out inspections of Chinese prisons, releasing information on the fateof all the victims of the Tiananmen crackdown, and also strengthening its export control system andimproving its commitment to international non-proliferation norms;
User's Guide
14. Notes the changes to the User's Guide and encourages further updates according to new develop-
ments in the Code —for example, on the elaborated guidelines for Criterion 8 as these guidelines are an
important element in assessing the impact of arms exports on development policies and programmes; callsfor respect for human rights to be used as a general criterion;C 280 E/446 MT 18.11.2006 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 17 ta' Novembru 2005
15. Calls for the adoption of a new Code giving greater weight to the problem of arms proliferation and
to the inclusion of Council Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 of 22 June 2000 setting up a Communityregime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology (
1);urges further improvements before
the new Code is adopted, such as the implementation of a human rights criterion, which must not beconfined to considering whether a country is prepared to respect the international rules of war, and callsfor it to be more politically binding until such time as it becomes legally binding;
Best practices for interpretation of criteria
16. Recognises the acknowledgement by Member States that best practices for the interpretation of the
criteria should be extended to the other seven criteria; stresses the need for a systematic approach, includingan outline of how, and a timeline of when, the issue will be addressed so that guidelines are produced as
efficiently as possible;
National reporting procedures
17. Calls for the quality of national reporting to be substantially improved in order to permit accurate
assessment of Member States' application of the Code of Conduct and to increase transparency; further-more, Member States should agree on common specific standards to which all states must be required toadhere, including on the number of export and brokering licences covered by a recipient country, a fulldescription of the types of equipment licensed for export, the quantity of each type of equipment licensedfor export and specification on the type of end-user; urges that the funding of arms exports, e.g. in the formof state loans and loan guarantees, should in future be included in the national reports;
18. Urges the Council to require every Member State to publish national reports to agreed minimum
standards;
Functions and content of an EU Consolidated Report
19. Urges the Council to take the following steps towards creating an EU Consolidated Report:
— identify timelines for information exchange and publish any statistical data in electronic format on a
quarterly basis;
— use the recommendations in the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Policy Paper
on Improving the Annual Report (
2) in order to achieve common reporting standards and to facilitate
the collection and submission of data for the EU Report;
— publish more information on EU-wide processes, including the denials system for export licences, the
denials system for brokering licences and the database containing information on national outreachactivities;
— provide details on how each priority guideline will be applied, the mechanisms that will be used, and
the schedule for action;
Incorporation of goods for re-export
20. Calls for the removal of the new guidelines on “incorporation ”and calls upon all Member States to
reaffirm their commitment to apply the Code to the export of components for incorporation;
(1) OJ L 159, 30.6.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1504/2004.
(2) The European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports: Improving the Annual Report. SIPRI Policy Paper No 8,
SIPRI, November 2004.18.11.2006 MT C 280 E/447 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 17 ta' Novembru 2005
End-use
21. Welcomes the Priority Guideline on post-export controls and urges Member States to agree procedu-
res for the verification of deliveries to, and end-use/user in, recipient countries; recommends that MemberStates develop information-exchange mechanisms and consider the usefulness of expanding the central
database to include information on end-use concerns in recipient countries, past instances of misuse and/
or diversion, information-exchange between Member States on delivery and end-use/user verification ofexports;
22. Calls for more pro-active European Union and national approaches to the control of exports of dual-
use items in order to avoid the risk of possible access to sensitive items by undesirable end-users in thirdcountries;
23. Recommends that the Member States examine thoroughly the human rights situation in arms-impor-
ting countries;
Outreach
24. Calls for more information on the database containing information on outreach activities, as stipula-
ted in the Sixth Annual Report;
25. Recommends that Member States actively pursue key outreach priorities and coordinate activities on
that basis;
26. Calls on the Council to share with the European Parliament details on “Troika ”meetings relevant to
export controls;
Arms brokering
27. Urges Member States to work towards common implementation of the Common Position, particu-
larly through implementation of planned information exchange mechanisms on brokering activities;
28. Urges common minimum practice on extraterritorial controls including the prohibition of brokering
activities in violation of an arms embargo, irrespective of whether it is carried out at home or abroad;Member States should also follow the example of countries, including Belgium, the Czech Republic, Estonia,Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Finland, which require a licence for brokering of military equipment carriedout abroad; as a minimum, Member States should follow the example of Germany where brokering in smallarms and light weapons carried out abroad will also be subject to licensing;
29. Recommends that Member States further develop the Common Position by setting up a national
registry of arms brokers which should include information on transportation and financial services related
to third-country transfers of military equipment; urges the extension of the brokering database for denials toinclude information on the consultation on denials;
Regulation on torture equipment
30. Welcomes the Commission's proposal, agreed by the 25 Member States, to adopt a new trade Regu-
lation on torture equipment;
31. Welcomes the fact that the recently enacted Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 of 27 June 2005
concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel,inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (
1) imposes a ban and/or other restrictions on exports and
imports of police and security equipment whose use is inherently cruel, inhuman or degrading, includingleg-irons, as called for in Parliament's resolution of 3 October 2001 on the Council's Second Annual Reportaccording to Operative Provision 8 of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports (
2);
(1) OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 1.
(2) OJ C 87 E, 11.4.2002, p. 136.C 280 E/448 MT 18.11.2006 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 17 ta' Novembru 2005
32. Urgently calls for the extension of trade regulations on torture equipment to include controls on the
transit of equipment through EU territory;
33. Refers to Article 33 of the UN Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners and urges that the
trade regulations on leg-irons do not contradict UN minimum standards; urgently calls for adherence to UNMinimum Rules on the prohibition of leg-irons;
34. Urges Member States to use the EU Code and specifically the Common Position on Brokering to
cover the brokering of torture equipment;
Enlargement of the EU
35. Urges Member States to look ahead to future expansion of the EU, and consider how best to involve
and assist the next wave of accession states in information exchange mechanisms, in particular on COARMdiscussions and the denial notification system of the EU Code, in order to ensure the harmonisation of
policies on arms export control and full implementation of the Code of Conduct's principles and criteria;
International processes
36. Underlines the need for the EU and its Member States to play a dynamic role in supporting national,
regional and international processes, for instance, the Economic Community of West African States (Ecowas)
Moratorium (
1) and the Nairobi Protocol (2);
37. Calls on the Council and the Commission to include in their further negotiations about developments
in relation to the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Partnership and Cooperation Agreements thequestion of adherence to the EU embargo on trade in arms with the People's Republic of China;
38. Encourages Member States to use their experiences to promote and carry forward principles and key
concepts within the Code, such as the criteria-based export licensing system, to other European states andother regions;
39. Is concerned by the problem of small arms and light weapons trafficking and impunity and calls on
the EU, with the collaboration of the UN, to promote an international system for marking and tracing smallarms and light weapons in order to create an efficient tool to combat their illicit manufacture, transfer anduse worldwide;
40. Urges Member States to support the international Arms Trade Treaty, which seeks to build on com-
mon principles for international arms control;
41. Welcomes dialogue between the European Parliament and COARM, and calls for a systematic dialo-
gue and information-exchange in order to continue supporting a transparent and strengthened EU exportcontrol regime;
42. Calls on the Member States to commit once more to the principle that the criteria of the EU Code of
Conduct will not be compromised in the pursuit of foreign policy objectives;
Development perspective on arms export controls
43. Highlights the dangers of small arms and light weapons (SALW) proliferation to sustainable develop-
ment and vulnerable social groups such as women and children, and therefore urges the Council and the
Commission to prepare guidelines for SALW policies and programmes in developing countries that arecompatible and consistent with EU development policy objectives and the need to support vulnerablegroups;
(1) Economic Community of West African States Moratorium on the Importation, Exportation and Manufacture of
SALW (Small Arms and Light Weapons) in West Africa.
(2) Nairobi Protocol for the Prevention, Control and Reduction of SALW in the Great Lakes Region and the Horn of
Africa.18.11.2006 MT C 280 E/449 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 17 ta' Novembru 2005
44. Remains concerned that the legal dispute between the Council and the Commission over support for
Ecowas on small arms and light weapons risks holding up the establishment of effective mechanisms andprogrammes to tackle arms issues and related problems in the west African region;
45. Calls on the Council and the Commission to assess the role of DDR (disarmament, demobilisation,
reintegration) projects in European Union external relations and development policies, and to clarify thedivision of labour between DG Development and DG External Relations in relation to those policies, andin this context further stresses the importance of an independent European Union development cooperationpolicy;
46. Further encourages Member States and the Commission to join the European Parliament in promo-
ting good governance in relations with all regional organisations and third countries such as is being deve-loped in partnership with African institutions, particularly in the field of the arms trade through such bodiesas the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, Ecowas and the African Union;
47. Welcomes the proposed comprehensive Strategy on SALW and calls on the Council and the Commi-
ssion to clearly set out the budgetary implications of supporting such a strategy in accordance with theirrespective competences for the years 2005 and 2006;
*
**
48. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments
and parliaments of the Member States and the UN Secretary-General.
P6_TA(2005)0437
Mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund
European Parliament resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and ofthe Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund according to point 3 of theInterinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Counciland the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund supplementing the
Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the bud-
getary procedure (COM(2005)0401 —C6-0277/2005 —2005/2171(ACI))
The European Parliament ,
— having regard to the Commission proposal (COM(2005)0401 —C6-0277/2005),
— having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the
Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure (
1),
— having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parlia-
ment, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund sup-plementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvementof the budgetary procedure (
2) and to the conditions governing the resort to it,
— having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the Euro-
pean Union Solidarity Fund (3),
(1) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1. Agreement amended by Decision 2003/429/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 25).
(2) OJ C 283, 20.11.2002, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3.C 280 E/450 MT 18.11.2006 Il-Ġurnal Uffi ċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 17 ta' Novembru 2005