33. Emphasises the importance of the EUSF as the main instrument that should enable the European
Union to react rapidly to major disasters, such as floods, fires and drought, as well as to cyclones, earthqua-
kes, volcanic eruptions or even tsunamis; urges the Commission and the Council to adopt Parliament's pro-posals for a review of that fund, with particular reference to extending the assistance provided to all victimsof natural disasters and their immediate family members;
34. Urges the Council to adapt the EUSF with particular reference to time limits and eligible actions in
order to enable it to deal with the kind of specific natural disasters which occur in the Member States, suchas fires, droughts and floods;
35. Considers that the EUSF should continue to enable action to be taken in the case of disasters which,
although significant, do not achieve the minimum level required and that assistance may also be provided inspecial circumstances in cases where most of the population in a specific region has been affected by a disas-
ter which will have a serious, long-term effects on their living conditions;
36. Nevertheless, points to the need for the involvement of other existing instruments, such as State aid
for regional purposes or European Investment Bank loans, with the aim of preventing if possible natural
disasters from happening and remedying the damage caused by natural disasters;
37. Asks that the setting up of an agriculture disaster fund be looked into for the purpose of providing
compensation for any loss of income stemming from crop losses on the part of farmers affected by natural
disasters;
38. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, to the governments
and parliaments of the Member States having regions affected by natural disasters in 2005, to the regionaland local authorities of those areas, as well as to the Committee of the Regions.
P6_TA(2006)0224
Natural Disasters —environmental aspects
European Parliament resolution on Natural Disasters (fires, droughts and floods) —environmental
aspects (2005/2192(INI))
The European Parliament,
—having regard to its resolutions of 5 September 2002 on floods in Europe (1), 14 April 2005 on the
drought in Portugal (2), 12 May 2005 on the drought in Spain (3) and 8 September 2005 on the natural
disasters (fires and floods) in Europe that summer (4),
—having regard to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of
11 December 1997, and the ratification thereof by the European Community on 25 April 2002,
—having regard to its resolution of 16 November 2005 on “Winning the Battle against Global Climate
Change” (5),
—having regard to its resolution of 18 January 2006 on Climate Change (6),7.12.2006 375 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 18 ta' Mejju 2006MT
(1) OJ C 272 E, 13.11.2003, p. 471.
(2) OJ C 33 E, 9.2.2006, p. 599.
(3) OJ C 92 E, 20.4.2006, p. 414.
(4)Texts Adopted on that date, P6_TA(2005)0334.
(5)Texts Adopted on that date, P6_TA(2005)0433.
(6)Texts Adopted on that date, P6_TA(2006)0019.
—having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
17 November 2003 concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community
(Forest Focus) (1),
—having regard to its resolution of 16 February 2006 on implementation of a European Union forest stra-
tegy (2) and the Commission's communication on a European forest strategy (COM(1998)0649),
—having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the Euro-
pean Union Solidarity Fund (3), currently under revision,
—having regard to the Commission's communications concerning the space programme Global Monito-
ring for Environment and Security (GMES) (COM(2004)0065), and reinforcing EU Disaster and CrisisResponse in third countries (COM(2005)0153), and the proposal for a Directive on the assessment andmanagement of floods (COM(2006)0015),
—having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a Rapid Response and Preparedness
Instrument for major emergencies (COM(2005)0113) and the proposal for a Council decision establis-hing a Community civil protection mechanism (COM(2006)0029), recast of Council Decision
2001/792/EC, Euratom of 23 October 2001 establishing a Community mechanism to facilitate reinfor-
ced cooperation in civil protection assistance interventions (
4),
—having regard to the research project into management of flood risks under the European Union Sixth
Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (2002-2006),
—having regard to the resolution and annex adopted on 26 March 2006 by the Euro-Mediterranean Parlia-
mentary Assembly's working party on civil protection and the prevention of natural and ecological disas-ters (
5),
—having regard to the scientific report by the Institute for Environment and Sustainability of the Commis-
sion's Joint Research Centre on climate change and the European water dimension (6),
—having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
—having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
(A6-0149/2006),
A. whereas climate change is causing and intensifying extreme weather events and natural disasters (floo-
ding, extreme droughts and fires) which have been occurring in ever more rapid succession throughout
the world, and have caused grave damage in terms of human losses, environmental deterioration and
reduction of economic activity,
B. whereas at the last UN Conference on Climate Change held in December 2005 in Montreal, Canada, sig-
nificant progress was made at world level with regard to ways of fighting climate change and strengthe-ning respect for and implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, and foresight was displayed with regard tothe second period of commitment following 2012,
C. whereas forests and agriculture play a fundamental role in environmental conservation, in terms of the
balances generated in both the carbon and the hydrological cycles, whose contribution to slowing downglobal warming, avoiding erosion, preventing the effects of torrential rain and moderating the green-
house effect is simply incalculable,
D. whereas situations of extreme drought and forest fires have increased in frequency and scale in southern
Europe and whereas, despite their being exacerbated by climate change, these situations are to a certain
extent unforeseeable and inevitable, which means that the relevant scientific research needs to be furtherdeveloped and greater funding assigned to it, with a view to improving risk assessment mechanisms, sys-tems of prevention and means of combating these phenomena,7.12.2006 376 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 18 ta' Mejju 2006MT
(1) OJ L 324, 11.12.2003, p. 1.
(2)Texts Adopted on that date, P6_TA(2006)0068.
(3) OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3.
(4) OJ L 297, 15.11.2001, p. 7.
(5) http://www.europarl.eu.int/intcoop/empa/committee_cult/wg_tsunami_res26mars_en.pdf.
(6) http://ies.jrc.cec.eu.int/fileadmin/Documentation/Reports/Inland_and_Marine_Waters/Pubs/Climate_Change_and_t-
he_European_Water_Dimension_2005.pdf.
E. whereas the Forest Focus programme is intended to promote information exchange on forests in the
Community so as to promote their conservation and protection; whereas the programme covers integra-
ted programmes designed to protect forests against fire and to combat desertification,
F. whereas the Solidarity Fund Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains prior conditions which make it dif-
ficult to use the Fund in certain disaster situations; whereas this concerns not only the amount and type
of the eligible expenditure, but also the inflexibility of the deadlines and procedures,
G. whereas natural disasters exacerbate problems of erosion, salination and desertification, undermine eco-
systems and biodiversity, affect sustainable development and jeopardise social cohesion,
H. whereas natural disasters can also lead to significant displacement and loss of wildlife populations and
domestic animals, causing distress to both the local communities and their dependent animals; whereas
few response mechanisms exist,
I. whereas the UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction claims that better urban planning in areas
at risk and the preservation of ecosystems could reduce the impact of natural disasters,
J. whereas the Commission is a signatory to the UN Convention to Combat Desertification, a phenomenon
whose growth is mentioned in the UN Millennium Declaration, and whereas 2006 was declared Interna-tional Year of Deserts and Desertification,
K. whereas the measures currently in force in the European Union have been shown to be insufficient or
inadequate in terms of providing an effective response to natural disasters, and whereas the diversity of,and lack of coordination between, mechanisms and solutions which exist at national and regional leveldo not favour effective action,
L. whereas preventive measures, and measures to prepare and train crews, are important for putting out
fires, as is the coordination of material and human resources for fire-fighting purposes,
M. whereas the number and scale of floods in Europe, including Central and Eastern Europe, has grown
considerably; whereas efforts must be made to improve forecasting and prevention —including the rege-
neration of polders and coastal wetlands —and arrangements for warning the population of impending
floods and ensuring that they are evacuated,
1. Welcomes the growth in public awareness of and support for environmental measures to avert major
disaster situations; proposes that measures to ensure more sustainable, rational and efficient use of water betaken within the European Union and especially in the most seriously affected areas and regions, and that
major water consumers in agriculture, tourism, towns and industry be targeted by these measures; advocates
the application of the “user pays” and“polluter pays” principles so as to guarantee a more rational use of
water and better monitoring and inspection of effluents;
2. Highlights the need to promote awareness-raising campaigns in respect of prevention, adoption of good
practice and the publicising of procedures to be adopted in disaster situations such as fires and floods, to be
funded by the European Social Fund or within the context of specific programmes such as Forest Focus;points out that action to train the public should pay special attention to training young people, starting withschoolchildren;
3. Urges the Member States to increase their cooperation on civil protection at European Union level, so
as to ensure availability of additional resources for rapid action to combat emergency situations;
4. Calls on the Commission to include the construction of infrastructure and the acquisition of technical
fire-fighting equipment, including airborne equipment, as expenditure qualifying for Community funding;7.12.2006 377 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 18 ta' Mejju 2006MT
5. Welcomes the Commission's action plan on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT)
for combating illegal logging, and the new financial instrument for the environment (Life+ programme),
which is essential to the protection of Europe's forests and to preventing deterioration of all kinds, includingfires;
6. Urges the Member States to reflect on the role of forests in the European Union, as part of a systematic
set of land management measures including flood safety measures concentrating on more effective water
retention and geological safety measures designed to stabilise slopes and carry out reafforestation wherever
possible; proposes that a public debate be launched on their environmental, social and economic role, andthat this debate be used to increase awareness of the existing disparities between Europe's forests and parti-cularly the specific nature of Mediterranean forests; believes that there is a need to make better use of theStructural and Cohesion Funds for structural measures to prevent drought, the main aggravating factor innatural disasters; also believes that incentives should be provided for forest conservation and management of
the countryside so as to establish a variety of uses (forestry, grazing, arable crops, irrigation, etc.); maintains
that monoculture should be practised only in clearly circumscribed areas particularly well suited to the spe-cies concerned and the related economic activities, and that it is necessary for such systems to be based ongood sense and for owners and producers to exercise their responsibilities scrupulously;
7. Invites the Commission to set serious, solidarity-based objectives within the joint legislative framework
on tackling and preventing natural disasters, and particularly the adoption of the new Regulation on the
Solidarity Fund and the Directive on assessing and managing floods and, furthermore, within the forthco-ming revision of the Forest Focus programme, increasing funding and making the rules governing applica-tion more flexible;
8. Calls for support to enable affected areas to be reafforested, without damaging their bioclimate or ecolo-
gical characteristics, and hopes that rehabilitation of the rural and urban landscape will be treated as a matter
of particular importance, having due regard to specific local features;
9. Stresses the need to provide sufficient funding for conservation of the Natura 2000 network;10. Believes that the reconstruction/restoration of the Natura 2000 network areas damaged by flooding,
drought or fires should be financed by the Community Funds, given that these are important parts of Euro-
pe's green spaces which ensure biological diversity and the conservation of species; urges the Member Statesto establish national forest funds for forest disaster prevention and forest renewal;
11. Invites the Commission to ensure that future discussions on disaster relief and civil protection instru-
ments also consider domestic animals and wildlife;
12. Calls on the Commission to submit a strategy on drought on which to base a European drought risk
prevention and management policy;
13. Calls for severe drought to be included amongst the Solidarity Fund support mechanisms, since
drought is an anomalous natural phenomenon, which develops slowly and is of variable duration, withserious, lasting repercussions on the living conditions and socioeconomic stability of the affected regions;
recommends that the Fund maintain the possibility of supporting localised crisis situations (regional charac-
ter) and make both public and private damage eligible;
14. Recommends the establishment of a European observatory on drought, desertification, floods and
other effects of climate change in order to gather information and ensure a more effective response;
15. Recommends that preventive measures be implemented in the area of drought risk management,
including strategies to minimise the resulting impacts, and incorporated into river basin management strate-
gies;7.12.2006 378 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 18 ta' Mejju 2006MT
16. Recognises the need to investigate and develop new forms of fire prevention and detection and fire-
fighting assistance using satellites and other cutting-edge technologies; believes that it is essential to adopt
new information technologies (e.g. the Geographical Information System) for managing fires and floods;stresses the essential role of new detection technology in preventing natural disasters;
17. Recommends measures to protect forests against fire, specifically the collection and recycling of forest
biomass residue, the prohibition of changing the use of burnt land, and sharper penalties for criminal acts
against the environment, especially causing forest fires; believes that the collection of biomass residue shouldbe regulated so as to prevent it from accelerating desertification by depleting organic matter and degradingthe soil, thus making the latter more vulnerable to the risks of drought and torrential flooding;
18. Calls on the Commission to put forward a directive on preventing and managing fires, to include the
regular collection of data, preparation of maps and identification of areas at risk, preparation of fire risk
management plans, identification by the Member States of the resources allocated and facilities available,coordination of the various administrations, minimum requirements for training crews, establishment ofenvironmental responsibility and penalties;
19. Asks the Commission to recommend to the Member States that they draw up fire and flood risk
maps, and that these are taken into account in territorial planning management;
20. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, and the governments
and parliaments of the Member States.
P6_TA(2006)0225
Treaty establishing the Energy Community
European Parliament resolution on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Com-
munity Treaty
The European Parliament,
—having regard to the Commission proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion by the European
Community of the Energy Community Treaty (COM(2005)0435),
—having regard to the Council's draft decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the
Energy Community Treaty (13886/1/2005),
—having regard to the legal basis chosen for the conclusion of the Energy Community Treaty, which effec-
tively limits the role of the European Parliament to giving or withholding its assent to the conclusion of
the Treaty, without any effective participation in the decision-making procedure,
—having regard to its position of 18 May 2006 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion
by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty (1) giving its assent to the conclusion of
the Treaty,
—having regard to Rule 108(5) of its Rules of Procedure;
1. Notes that the EC, by means of the conclusion of this Energy Community Treaty (ECT), in a sense crea-
tes a precedent by extending the acquis communautaire of the internal market in the field of electricity and gas
to the nine contracting parties to the ECT;7.12.2006 379 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea
Il-Ħamis, 18 ta' Mejju 2006MT
(1)Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0219.