2004D0111 — MT — 27.08.2004 — 001.001

Dan id-dokument ġie magħmul bil-ħsieb li jintuża bħala għodda ta’ dokumentazzjoni u l-istituzzjonijiet ma jassumu l-ebda responsabbiltà għall-kontenut tiegħu

►B ID-DEĊIŻJONI TAL-KUMMISSJONI tad-29 ta’ Jannar 2004 dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta’ stħarriġ għall-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar fit-tjur u għasafar selvaġġi fl-Istati Membri, li għandu jitwettaq matul l-2004 (notifikata bid-dokument numru K(2004) 134) (2004/111/KE) (ĠU L 032, 5.2.2004, p.20)

Emendat bi:

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali No page date ►M1 COMMISSION DECISION of 23 July 2004 (*) L 278 59 27.8.2004







(*) Dan l-att qatt ma ġie ppubblikat bil-Malti.









▼B

ID-DEĊIŻJONI TAL-KUMMISSJONI

tad-29 ta’ Jannar 2004

dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta’ stħarriġ għall-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar fit-tjur u għasafar selvaġġi fl-Istati Membri, li għandu jitwettaq matul l-2004

(notifikata bid-dokument numru K(2004) 134)

(2004/111/KE)







IL-KUMMISSJONI TAL-KOMUNITAJIET EWROPEJ, Wara li kkunsidrat it-Trattat li jistabbilixxi l-Komunità Ewropea, Wara li kkunsidrat id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill 90/424/KEE tas-26 ta’ Ġunju 1990 dwar in-nefqa fil-qasam veterinarju ( 1 ), u b’mod partikolari l-Artikolu 20 tagħha, Billi: (1) Skond id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 92/40/KEE tad-19 ta’ Mejju 1992 li tintroduċi miżuri tal-Komunità għall-kontroll ta’ l-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar ( 2 ) immonitorjar regolari ta’ qatgħat tat-tjur u għasafar selvaġġi sabiex tistma l-presenza possibbli ta’ mard f’dawn il-popolazzjonijiet mhux previst. (2) L-esperjenza wriet li ċerti xejriet tal-virus ta’ l-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar, li fil-present m’humiex koperti b’miżuri ta’ kontroll tad-Direttiva, għandhom l-abbiltà li jindiblu għal xejriet patoġeniċi ħafna wara li jkunu ċċirkolaw fil-popolazzjoni tat-tjur għal xi żmien. (3) Din is-sitwazzjoni x’aktarx li toħloq mortalità għolja fit-tjur u telf ekonomiku iebes għall-industrija tat-tjur, li jista’ jitnaqqas permezz ta’ l-implimentazzjoni ta’ sistema ta’ skrinjar fl-Istati Membri biex jippermetti skoperta aktar kmieni u kontroll ta’ dawk it-tnedenzi prekursuri. (4) Il-Kumitat Xjentifiku dwar is-Saħħa ta’ l-Annimali u l-Welfare ta’ l-Annimali ħareġ opinjoni dwar id-definizzjoni ta’ l-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar u l-użu tat-tilqim kontra l-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar. F’dan ir-rapport kien rakkomandat li tinbidel id-definizzjoni għall-influwenza ta’l-għasafar sabiex tinkludi aktar tendenzi ta’ l-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar li għalihom huma adattati miżuri ta’ eradikazzjoni. B’żieda, l-stħarriġ għandu jitwettaq biex jistabilixxi il-prevalenza ta’ dawk it-tendenzi f’popolazzjonijiet differenti ta’ tjur. Dan għandu jippermetti stima tan-nefqa għall-miżuri modifikati tal-kontroll tal-marda. (5) F’Novembru 2001 il-Kummissjoni organizzat simposju dwar il-preparatezza tal-pandemiċi ta’ l-influwenza fil-bniedem. Kien enfasizzat li stħarriġ f’popolazzjonijiet varji ta’ Annimali għandu jitwettaq biex itejjeb l-aċċess għall-impatt żunotiku ta’ dawk l-infezzjonijiet. (6) Kemm l-aspett żunotiku u l-implikazzżjonijiet tas-saħħa ta’ l-annimali jsostnu l-ħtieġa ta’ stħarriġ għall-influwenza f’popolazzjonijiet ta’ l-annimali. (7) Fl-2002 u l-2003 l-Istati Membri kollha implimentaw stħarriġ għall-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar fit-tjur u l-parti ‘l kbira tal-pajjiżi wettqu wkoll skrinjar f’għasafar selvaġġi skond id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 2002/649/KE ( 3 ). (8) Il-programmi ndividwali u l-kontribuzzjoni finanzjarja tal-Komunità lejn kull wieħed minn dawn il-programmi kienet ġiet approvata bid-Deċiżjoni 2002/673/KE ( 4 ). (9) Matul dan l-istħarriġ il-presenza ta’ subtipi differenti ta’ viruses ta’ l-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar H5 u H7 ġiet skoperta fi tjur f’diversi Stati Membri. Għalkemm il-prevalenza kurrenti tal-viruses ta’ l-influwenza ta’l-għasafar tista’ titqies pjuttost baxxa, jista’ jiġi konkluż li huwa importanti li dawn is-sejbiet pożittivi jiġu segwiti u li titkompla s-sorveljanza fis-sena 2004 biex tiġi miftiehma aħjar l-epidemjoloġija tal-viruses ta’ l-influwenza ta’ l-għasafar. (10) L-Istati Membri għandhom jibgħatu l-programmi tagħhom għall-approvazzjoni mill-Kummissjoni sabiex dik l-għajnuna finanzjarja mill-Komunità tkun tista’tingħata. (11) L-Artikolu 32 ta’ l-Att ta’ l-Adeżjoni ta’ l-2003 jipprovdi li l-Istati Membri l-ġodda għandhom jirċievu l-istess trattament ta’ l-Istati Membri fir-rigward tan-nefqa taħt il-fondi veterinarji. (12) Madankollu, ma tista’ ssir ebda rabta finanzjarja għal xi programm qabel l-adeżjoni qabel ma tkun seħħet l-adeżjoni konċernata ta’ l-Istati Membri. B’żieda, l-immonitorjar ta’ ċertu mard fl-Istati Membri ta’ adeżjoni jista’ wkoll jiġi ko-finanzjat minn strumenti oħra tal-Komunità. (13) Il-miżuri li għalihom tipprovdi din id-Deċiżjoni huma skond l-opinjoni tal-Kumitat Permanenti dwar il-Katina ta’ l-Ikel u s-Saħħa ta’ l-Annimali, Billi: ADOTTAT DIN ID-DEĊIŻJONI:







L-Artikolu 1

▼M1

Member States shall submit for approval to the Commission by 15 June 2004 plans for the implementation of surveys for avian influenza in poultry and wild birds in accordance with the requirements and guidelines laid down in the Annex.

▼B

L-Artikolu 2

Il-kontribuzzjoni finanzjarja tal-Komunità’s lejn il-miżuri msemmija fl-Artikolu 1 għandha tkun bir-rata ta’ 50 % tan-nefqa magħmula fl-Istati Membri għall-ikkampjonar u l-analiżi tal-kampjuni sa massimu ta’ ►M1 EUR 1 000 000 ◄ għat-total ta’ l-Istati Membri kollha.

L-Artikolu 3

Din id-Deċiżjoni hija ndirizzata lill-Istati Membri.

▼M1









ANNEX

Programmes for surveillance for avian influenza in poultry and wild birds to be carried out in the Member States in 2004

OBJECTIVES:

1. To detect the prevalence of infections with avian influenza virus subtypes H5 and H7 in different species of poultry by repeating the screening exercise of 2002/2003 in a modified, more targeted manner.

2. To further contribute to a cost-benefit study in relation to eradication of all H5 and H7 subtypes from poultry envisaged by the change in definition of avian influenza.

3. To continue surveillance for avian influenza on a voluntary basis in wild birds, in particular by those Member States which have already good cooperation with ornithological organisations or other bodies. The outcome of such surveillance should further provide valuable information for an early warning system of strains that may be introduced into poultry flocks from wild birds.

4. To contribute to the knowledge on the threats of avian influenza to animal health from wildlife.

5. To foster the connection and integration of human and veterinary networks for influenza surveillance.

A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS IN POULTRY

— Sampling shall cover the winter period as in many countries a large slaughter of poultry (in particular turkeys and geese) takes place around Christmas.

— 15 March 2005 shall be the date for the submission of the final survey results.

— Testing of samples shall be carried out at national laboratories for avian influenza (NL) in Member States or by other laboratories authorised by the competent authorities and under the control of the NL.

— All results (both serological and virological) shall be sent to the Community Reference Laboratory (CRL) for collation. A good flow of information must be ensured. The CRL shall provide technical support and keep an enlarged stock of diagnostic reagents.

— All AI virus isolates shall be submitted to the CRL. Viruses of H5/H7 subtype shall be subjected to the standard characterisation tests (nucleotide sequencing/IVPI) according to Council Directive 92/40/EEC.

— All positive findings shall be retrospectively investigated at the holding and the conclusions of this investigation shall be reported to the Commission and the CRL.

— Specific protocols to accompany the sending of material to the CRL and reporting tables for collection of survey data shall be provided by the CRL. In those tables the laboratory testing methods used shall be indicated.

— Blood samples for serological examination shall be collected from all species of poultry, from at least five to 10 birds (except ducks and geese) per holding, and from the different sheds, if more than one shed is present on a holding.

— Sampling shall be stratified throughout the whole Member State, so that samples can be considered as representative for the whole Member State, taking into account: — (a) the number of holdings to be sampled. This number shall be defined so as to ensure the identification of at least one infected holding if the prevalence of infected holdings is at least 5 %, with a 95 % confidence interval (see table 1); and (b) the number of birds sampled from each holding shall be defined so as to ensure 95 % probability of identifying at least one positive bird if the prevalence of sero-positive birds is ≥ 30 %.

— The sampling design shall also consider: — (a) the types of production and their specific risks, such as free range, outdoor keeping, multi age layers, use of surface water, a relatively longer life span, the presence of more than one species on the holding, etc.; (b) the number of turkey holdings to be sampled, which shall be defined to ensure the identification of at least one infected holding if the prevalence of infected holdings is at least 5 %, with a 99 % confidence interval; (c) where holdings producing ratites and quails are present in a Member State they shall be included in the programme; (d) the time period; where appropriate, sampling shall be adapted to identified periods, during which the presence of other poultry hosts on a holding might pose a greater risk for disease introduction; (e) Member States that must carry out sampling for Newcastle disease to maintain their status as Newcastle disease non-vaccinating countries (Decision 94/327/EC) may utilise these samples from breeding flocks for the surveillance of H5/H7 antibodies.







TABLE 1 Number of holdings to be sampled of each poultry category (except turkey holdings) Number of holdings per poultry category (except turkey holdings) Number of holdings to be sampled Up to 34 All 35-50 35 51-80 42 81-250 53 > 250 60







TABLE 2 Number of turkey holdings to be sampled Number of turkey holdings Number of holdings to be sampled Up to 46 All 47-60 47 61-100 59 101-350 80 > 350 90

B. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DETECTION OF INFECTIONS WITH H5/H7 SUBTYPES OF AVIAN INFLUENZA IN DUCKS AND GEESE

— Blood samples for serological testing shall be taken preferably from birds which are kept outside in fields.

— From each selected holding 40-50 blood samples shall be taken for serological testing.

C. SURVEY FOR AVIAN INFLUENZA IN WILD BIRDS

C.1. Survey design and implementation

— Liaisons with bird conservation/watching institutions and ringing stations are necessary. Sampling will probably be best carried out by staff from these groups/stations. Cooperation with hunters for obtaining samples from birds that are hunted may also be possible.

— Experience with the previous surveys has shown that the virus isolation rate was extremely low, therefore sampling should focus on the birds migrating south during autumn and early winter.

C.2. Sampling procedures

— Cloacal swabs for virological examination should be taken. In addition to “first year” birds in the autumn, host species with high susceptibility and increased contact with poultry (such as mallard ducks) may offer the highest chance of success.

— The distribution between the different species should ideally be as follows: — 70 % waterfowl 20 % shorebirds 10 % other free-living birds.

— Swabs containing faeces, or carefully collected fresh faeces shall be taken from wild birds trapped, hunted and found freshly dead.

— Pooling of up to five samples from the same species is possible.

— Specific care has to be taken for the storage and transport of samples. If rapid transport within 48 hours to the laboratory (in transport medium at 4 °Celsius) is not guaranteed, samples shall be stored and then transported in dry ice at – 70 °Celsius.

D. LABORATORY TESTING

Laboratory tests should be carried out pursuant to the guideline procedures established in Annex III to Council Directive 92/40/EEC (including examination of sera from ducks and geese by HI). However, if laboratory tests not laid down in the Directive 92/40/EEC, nor described in the OIE Terrestrial Manual, are envisaged, Member States shall provide the necessary validation data to the CRL, in parallel to submitting their programme to the Commission for approval. All positive serological findings shall be confirmed by the National laboratories for avian influenza by an haemagglutination-inhibition test, using designated strains supplied by the Community Reference Laboratory:

H5 (a) Initial test using Duck/Denmark/64650/03 (H5N7) (b) Test all positives with Ostrich/Denmark/72420/96 (H5N2) to eliminate N9 cross reactive antibody.

H7 (a) Initial test using Turkey/England/647/77 (H7N7) (b) Test all positives with African Starling/983/79 (H7N1) to eliminate N7 cross reactive antibody.