Komisijas paziņojums Padomei un Eiropas Parlamentam par kopienas līdzfinansētajiem dalībvalstu izdevumiem, kas radušies, ieviešot kopējai zivsaimniecības politikai piemērojamās uzraudzības un kontroles sistēmas laikposmā No 2001. līdz 2006. gadam /* COM/2009/0213 galīgā redakcija */





LV Briselē, 7.5.2009 COM(2009) 213 galīgā redakcija KOMISIJAS PAZIŅOJUMS PADOMEI UN EIROPAS PARLAMENTAM PAR KOPIENAS LĪDZFINANSĒTAJIEM DALĪBVALSTU IZDEVUMIEM, KAS RADUŠIES, IEVIEŠOT KOPĒJAI ZIVSAIMNIECĪBAS POLITIKAI PIEMĒROJAMĀS UZRAUDZĪBAS UN KONTROLES SISTĒMAS LAIKPOSMĀ NO 2001. LĪDZ 2006. GADAM KOMISIJAS PAZIŅOJUMS PADOMEI UN EIROPAS PARLAMENTAM PAR KOPIENAS LĪDZFINANSĒTAJIEM DALĪBVALSTU IZDEVUMIEM, KAS RADUŠIES, IEVIEŠOT KOPĒJAI ZIVSAIMNIECĪBAS POLITIKAI PIEMĒROJAMĀS UZRAUDZĪBAS UN KONTROLES SISTĒMAS LAIKPOSMĀ NO 2001. LĪDZ 2006. GADAM 1. PAMATOJUMS KOPIENAS LĪDZFINANSĒJUMA PIEŠĶIRŠANAI ZIVSAIMNIECĪBAS KONTROLEI Kopienas noteikumi par kopējās zivsaimniecības politikas (KZP) darbības jomā esošo zivju krājumu saglabāšanu var kļūt efektīvi tikai tad, ja par šo noteikumu pienācīgu īstenošanu atbildīgo dalībvalstu rīcībā ir pietiekami cilvēkresursi un tehniskie līdzekļi. Šā iemesla dēļ Kopiena kopš 1990. gada piemēro finansiālā atbalsta shēmu, saskaņā ar kuru dalībvalstis tiek atbalstītas to centienos īstenot Kopienas zivsaimniecības kontroles noteikumus. Ņemot vērā novērtējumus par atbalstīto pasākumu efektivitāti, kā arī jaunās problēmas zivsaimniecības kontroles jomā, atbalsta shēmā ir veikti vairāki grozījumi, piemēram, ar Padomes Lēmumu (EK) Nr. 431/2001 [1] un (EK) Nr. 465/2004 [2] — šajos tiesību aktos ir iekļauti atbalsta shēmas pamatnosacījumi attiecīgi 2001.-2003. gadam un 2004.-2006. gadam. 2. PADOMES LĒMUMS (EK) NR. 431/2001 UN 465/2004 2.1. Kopienas līdzfinansēto izdevumu veidi Padomes Lēmuma (EK) Nr. 431/2001 2. pantā noteiktie Kopienas atbalsta saņemšanai attiecināmo izdevumu veidi ir apkopoti un papildināti Padomes Lēmuma (EK) Nr. 465/2004 atbilstošajā 4. pantā, gan ar nelielām izmaiņām formulējumā. Piemēram, abos lēmumos ir paredzēts atbalsts IT tīklu izveidei, kas atvieglotu ar kontroli saistītu datu apmaiņu starp atsevišķu dalībvalstu iestādēm, kā arī starp dalībvalstu iestādēm un Komisiju. Novatoriskas pieejas ir jāstimulē, piešķirot līdzfinansējumu to izdevumu segšanai, kuri saistīti ar jauno tehnoloģiju ieviešanu zivsaimniecības kontroles jomā. Lēmumā 431/2001 izdevumi saistībā ar kuģu satelītuzraudzības sistēmu (VMS) un elektroniskajām reģistrācijas ierīcēm ir ietilpināti kategorijā "jaunās tehnoloģijas", savukārt Lēmumā 465/2004 tie norādīti kā atsevišķs izdevumu postenis. Lai palielinātu kontroles departamentu darbinieku prasmes un veicinātu dažādu dalībvalstu iestāžu darbību saskaņotību, atbalstāmo projektu sarakstā ir iekļautas attiecīgas mācību un apmaiņas programmas. Ņemot vērā Kopienas dalību reģionālajās zvejniecības organizācijās (RZO) un tās ieinteresētību šo organizāciju darbības efektivitātē, dalībvalstīm radušās izmaksas, kas saistītas ar jaunu inspekcijas un novērotāju shēmu ieviešanu RZO darbības ietvaros, ir attiecināmās izmaksas saskaņā ar atbalsta shēmu 2001.-2003. gadam. Attiecībā uz 2004.-2006. gadu noteikuma darbības joma ir paplašināta, iekļaujot attiecināmajās izmaksās inspekcijas un novērotāju izmēģinājuma shēmas kopumā, nevis tikai tās, kuras saistītas ar RZO. Turklāt Kopiena piešķir līdzfinansējumu kontroles, inspekcijas un pārraudzības aprīkojuma iegādei un modernizēšanai. Šis izdevumu veids aptver darbības no sīkiem remontdarbiem līdz pat jaunu patruļkuģu un lidaparātu būvei. Pie attiecināmajām izmaksām pieder arī izmaksas saistībā ar sistēmu kopējās zivsaimniecības politikas kontroles izdevumu novērtēšanai. Ņemot vērā to, cik dažāda ir dalībvalstu nostāja attiecībā uz izmeklēšanu KZP noteikumu nopietnu pārkāpumu gadījumos, saskaņā ar 2004.-2006. gada atbalsta shēmu attiecināmo izdevumu kategorijā ir iekļauti arī izdevumi saistībā ar semināriem un plašsaziņas līdzekļu izmantošanu, lai veicinātu izpratni par nepieciešamību cīnīties pret nelegālo zveju. Turklāt ar 2005. gada beigās izdarīto grozījumu [3] attiecināmajās izmaksās tika iekļautas arī dalībvalstīm radušās izmaksas saistībā ar pētījumiem zivsaimniecības kontroles jomā, kas veikti pēc Komisijas iniciatīvas. 2.2. Ieguldījuma likmes Padomes Lēmuma (EK) Nr. 431/2001 5.-10. pantā un Padomes Lēmuma (EK) Nr. 465/2004 6. panta 2. punktā noteiktas maksimālās ieguldījuma likmes pa attiecināmo izdevumu veidiem attiecīgi 2001.-2003. gadam un 2004.-2006. gadam. Kā redzams I pielikuma tabulas kreisās puses iedaļā, 2004.-2006. gada atbalsta shēmā ir veiktas tikai nelielas izmaiņas salīdzinājumā ar iepriekšējo atbalsta shēmu. 3. KOMISIJAS IKGADĒJIE FINANSĒŠANAS LĒMUMI 3.1. Ieguldījuma likmes Kā redzams I pielikuma tabulas labās puses iedaļā, ikgadējos finansēšanas lēmumos, ko pieņēmusi Komisijas, īstenojot Padomes Lēmumu (EK) Nr. 431/2001 un 465/2004, kopumā ir piemērotas ieguldījuma likmes, kas atbilst abos minētajos lēmumos noteiktajām maksimālajām likmēm. Vienīgais izņēmums ir ieguldījuma likme ar IT saistīto izdevumu līdzfinansēšanai saskaņā ar 2002. un 2003. gada finansēšanas lēmumiem — pieļaujamo 65 % likmes vietā tika piemērota 50 % likme. Noteikumi saistībā ar VMS 2001.-2003. gada un 2004.-2006. gada laikposmos tika piemēroti līdzīgā veidā. Abos laikposmos tika noteiktas maksimālās ar satelītnovērošanas iekārtu saistīto attiecināmo izdevumu summas līdzfinansējuma saņemšanai, kā arī brīdis, kad 100 % ieguldījuma likmes vietā sāk piemērot 50 % likmi. 3.2. Kopējās saistību summas Gan Padomes Lēmuma 2001/431/EK 4. panta 2. punktā, gan grozītā Padomes Lēmuma 2004/465/EK 5. panta 1. punktā noteikta maksimālā summa Kopienas ieguldījumam zivsaimniecības kontrolē — 105 miljoni euro, kas sadalīti trīs gadiem. Šie noteikumi tika īstenoti ar ikgadējiem Komisijas finansēšanas lēmumiem. Katrai dalībvalstij tika noteikti attiecināmie izdevumi katrā izdevumu kategorijā, kā arī piemērojamās finansiālā ieguldījuma likmes; rezultātā maksimālā ieguldījumu summa 2001.-2003. gadam bija 100 890 377 euro un 2004.-2006. gadam — 98 319 418 euro [4]. 3.3. Maksimālie ieguldījumi pa attiecināmo izdevumu kategorijām Salīdzinot dažādu izdevumu posteņu relatīvo daļu no kopējām maksimālajām ieguldījumu summām laikposmos no 2001. līdz 2003. gadam un no 2004. līdz 2006. gadam (skatīt I attēlu), lielā mērā konstatējamas atbilstības. Izteikti lielāko daļu (56 % un 62,2 %) veido kuģu un lidaparātu būve/modernizēšana, kam seko līdzfinansējums saistībā ar jaunām tehnoloģijām (20,6 % un 16,6 %), kas vienkāršākas datu pasniegšanas labad (...PICT...) 2001.-2003. gads (...PICT...) 2004.-2006. gads I attēls – Maksimālie ieguldījumi pēc attiecināmo izdevumu veida norādīts kopā ar Kopienas ieguldījumiem saistībā ar VMS un citām elektroniskās ziņošanas ierīcēm. Trešajā vietā ir finansiālais atbalsts IT tīklu izveidei (16,7 % un 15,3 %), bet mazāku daļu (6,1 % un 3,9 %) veido finansiālais atbalsts kontroles inspektoru apmācībai. Gan 2001.-2003. gadā, gan 2004.-2006. gadā vismazāko izdevumu posteni (0,5 % un 0,1 %) veido ieguldījumi izdevumu novērtēšanas sistēmu izveidē; lielāku posteni veido atbalsts saistībā ar izpratnes veicināšanai paredzētiem semināriem (1,7 % laikposmā no 2004. līdz 2006. gadam) un atbalsts jauno inspekcijas grafiku īstenošanai (0,3 % laikposmā no 2004. līdz 2006. gadam). 3.3.1. Saistībā ar kontroles aprīkojumu sniegto Kopienas ieguldījumu relatīvā daļa Kā redzams I attēlā, gan 2001.-2003. gadā, gan 2004.-2006. gadā vairāk nekā 50 % no Kopienas ieguldījumiem piešķirti kuģu un lidaparātu iegādei un modernizēšanai, ieguldījuma daļai pieaugot no 56 % līdz 62 %. Tas acīmredzami skaidrojams galvenokārt ar vidējām vienības izmaksām šajā izdevumu kategorijā. Jūras kuģu būve var būt saistīta ar izmaksām vairāku miljonu euro apmērā; citās kategorijās šādas izmaksas nekad netiek sasniegtas. Lai tomēr samazinātu Kopienas līdzdalību šajā izdevumu kategorijā, Komisija nāca klajā ar paskaidrojuma rakstu, kas pievienots 2001.-2003. gada finansiālā atbalsta shēmas priekšlikumam [5], kurā paziņoja par selektīvāku atbalsta piešķiršanas politiku — nevis „sākotnējā aprīkojuma iegādei“, bet gan tikai "atjaunošanai un papildināšanai". Pēc tam finansiālo atbalstu šajā izdevumu kategorijā piešķīra arvien ierobežotāk. Laikposmā no 2001. līdz 2013. gadam to saistību procentuālā daļa, kuras attiecas uz nacionālajās kontroles programmās izmantoto kontroles aprīkojumu, bija tikai 74 %, bet, piemērojot 2004.-2006. gada atbalsta shēmu, tā samazinājās līdz 48 %. Tomēr šos Komisijas centienus kavēja tas, ka dalībvalstis pieprasīja arvien lielākas summas. Ja 2001. gadā saistībā ar kontroles aprīkojumu plānoto izdevumu summa bija aptuveni 40 miljoni euro, tad 2006. gada kontroles programmās tā jau pārsniedza 190 miljonus euro. Šo tendenci nemainīja pat ar aprīkojumu saistītiem izdevumiem piemērojamās maksimālās ieguldījuma likmes samazināšana, ko sākot no 2004. gada piemēroja finansēšanas lēmumos (līdzfinansējums 25 %, nevis 35 % apmērā). 3.3.2. Reti izmantotās vai neizmantotās izdevumu kategorijas Kā redzams I attēlā, noteiktās izdevumu kategorijās attiecināmo izdevumu nebija vispār, vai arī to daļa bija niecīga. 2001.-2003. gada laikposmā šāda situācija bija attiecībā uz dalībvalstu izmaksām saistībā ar jaunu inspekcijas un novērotāju grafiku īstenošanu reģionālo zvejniecības organizāciju darbības ietvaros. Ņemot vērā, ka tikai divas dalībvalstis veiksmīgi izmantoja iespēju pieteikties attiecīgā ieguldījuma saņemšanai, līdzīga problēma, šķiet, ir saistīta arī ar izdevumu novērtēšanas sistēmu izveidi. Arī 2004.-2006. gadā tikai divām dalībvalstu kontroles programmām atbilda budžeta saistības attiecībā uz šiem diviem izdevumu veidiem. 2004.-2006. gada atbalsta shēmā ieviestajās izdevumu kategorijās dalībvalstis pieprasīja līdzfinansējumu un tika apstiprinātas attiecīgas saistības tikai attiecībā uz izdevumiem saistībā ar semināriem par nelegālo zveju [6]. 4. PĀRSKATS PAR FINANSĒTAJIEM IZDEVUMU POSTEŅIEM Ar finansēšanas lēmumiem 2001.-2006. gadam līdz šim ir atlīdzināti izdevumi 472 projektos no 900 projektiem, par kuriem varēja pretendēt uz Kopienas līdzfinansējumu. Turpmāk norādītie skaitļi attiecas uz izdevumu posteņiem, kas ir samērā standartizēti un kurus tāpēc iespējams apkopot par visām dalībvalstīm. Tie uzskatāmāk parāda, kas līdz šim sasniegts ar Kopienas atbalsta palīdzību. Līdzfinansējums ir piešķirts 161 projektam saistībā ar zivsaimniecības kontroles darbinieku apmācību; no tiem vairāku projektu ietvaros notika personāla apmaiņa starp dalībvalstīm. Vēl 5 projekti bija veltīti tieši kontroles personāla apmaiņai ar mērķi sekmēt sadarbību un koordināciju starp dalībvalstīm. Šajā sakarā jāuzsver, ka četras no septiņām dalībvalstīm, kuras pievienojās ES 2004. gadā un kuras ir piekrastes valstis, ir saņēmušas līdzfinansējumu projektiem, kas daļēji vai pilnībā veltīti inspektoru apmaiņai. Tomēr trīs no šīm septiņām dalībvalstīm nav īstenojušas līdzfinansētu apmaiņu, bet divas nav īstenojušas pat līdzfinansētus mācību projektus. Ņemot vērā iespējamās priekšrocības, jo īpaši jaunajām dalībvalstīm, apmaiņas programmu potenciāls acīmredzot vēl nav izmantots pilnībā. 5066 "zilās kastes", kas līdzfinansētas saskaņā ar 2001.-2006. gada finansēšanas lēmumiem, sākotnēji šķiet iespaidīgs skaitlis. Tomēr, iedziļinoties šajā jautājumā, kļūst skaidrs, ka tas ir tālu no apmierinoša rādītāja. Piemēram, Komisijas finansēšanas Lēmums (EK) Nr. 690/2004 [7] attiecas tikai uz VMS un ir izstrādāts, pamatojoties uz konkrētām dalībvalstu prasībām. Tomēr tā rezultātā līdzfinansējums ir piešķirts tikai 1050 "zilajām kastēm", lai gan par atbilstīgām atbalsta saņemšanai atzītas 4653 "zilās kastes". Pieņemot, ka dalībvalstu pieprasījumi bija balstīti uz reālistisku novērtējumu par to kuģu skaitu, kuriem jābūt aprīkotiem ar "zilajām kastēm", šķiet pamatoti turpmākajos finansēšanas lēmumos prioritāti piešķirt ar VMS saistītiem izdevumiem. Ņemot vērā lielo starpību starp dažādiem izdevumiem saistībā ar kuģu finansēšanu, ir lietderīgi izdevumus klasificēt atbilstīgi kopējām būvniecības izmaksām paralēli dažādām attiecīgo kuģu klasēm. Zemākajā cenu klasē ietilpst kuģi, kas maksā līdz 50 000 euro [8], tostarp stingras piepūšamās laivas, ko parasti izmanto nelieliem attālumiem un var izmantot arī piekrastes ūdeņos. Kopiena ir sniegusi ieguldījumu apmēram 27 šīs klases kuģu iegādē. Cenu klasē no 50 000 līdz 1 000 000 euro ietilpst vairums patruļkuģu, no kuriem apmēram 33 kuģu būvei ir sniegts Kopienas līdzfinansējums. Pie kuģiem, kuru cena ievērojami pārsniedz 1 000 000 euro, pieder patruļkuģi, kas veic kontroli tāljūrā, dažreiz tālu no Eiropas ūdeņiem. Kopienas ieguldījums ir piešķirts 13 šāda veida kuģu būvei. 5. IKGADĒJO KONTROLES PROGRAMMU IZPILDE Pēc tam, kad ir aprakstīta Kopienas saistību struktūra un sniegti konkrēti skaitļi par līdz šim finansētajiem izdevumu posteņiem, būtu jāsniedz plašāks pārskats par to, kādā mērā faktiski ir izpildītas nacionālās kontroles programmas. Veicot aprēķinu par atcelto saistību kopējās summas procentuālo daļu no sākotnējām saistībām, iegūtais neizpildes koeficients 2001.-2003. gada laikposmā ir 25 %, bet 2004.-2006. gada laikposmā 14 %. Tā kā bez šiem rādītājiem jāņem vērā arī neizpildīto saistību attiecība pret sākotnējām saistībām — attiecīgi 33 % un 53 % —, tikai neizpildes koeficients 2001.-2003. gada laikposmam šķiet pietiekami pamatots, lai to analizētu tālāk. Tā kā neizpildes koeficients ir 25 % un neizpildīto saistību daļa 33 %, tas nozīmē, ka atlikusī saistību daļa (42 % no sākotnējām saistībām) ir izpildīta, tātad atcelto saistību attiecība pret samaksātajiem ieguldījumiem ir apmēram 1:2 [9]. Tādējādi iespējams, ka līdz brīdim, kad būs noslēgtas visas 2001.-2003. gada programmas, jauno atcelto saistību rezultātā neizpildes koeficients pieaugs vismaz līdz 33 %. Pieņemot, ka, jo ilgāks laiks būs pagājis kopš sākotnējām saistībām, jo vairāk pieaugs neizpildīto saistību atcelšanas iespējamība, aplēse 33 % šķiet esam pat diezgan piesardzīga. Gan ziņotais neizpildes koeficients, gan vēl jo vairāk aplēstais galīgais neizpildes koeficients, protams, ir pārmērīgi augsts. 5.1. Attiecība starp neizpildes koeficientiem un maksimālajiem ieguldījumiem II pielikuma tabulā ir atspoguļotas pamatā esošās struktūras un dalībvalstis, kuras piedalījās 2001-2003. gada atbalsta shēmā, sarindotas pēc to neizpildes koeficienta. Ar zvaigznīti atzīmētās dalībvalstis nav jāņem vērā, jo to neizpildīto saistību daļa ir ievērojami lielāka nekā faktiskā kopējā daļa (un tāpēc neizpildes koeficienti ir maldinoši zemi). Tomēr pārējās desmit dalībvalstis var droši pakļaut analīzei. Kā redzams tabulā, 1. līdz 10. dalībvalsts neizpildes koeficients svārstās no 25 % līdz pat gandrīz 100 % no maksimālā ieguldījuma. Salīdzinot šos rādītājus ar valstu secību tabulas vidū (dalībvalstīm piešķirtās maksimālās ieguldījuma summas), kļūst skaidrs, ka nav iemesla domāt par sistemātisku pozitīvu attiecību starp neizpildes koeficientiem un maksimālā ieguldījuma summām. Piemēram, Beļģijas gadījumā piešķirtā ieguldījuma summa ir otrā mazākā, tomēr neizpildes koeficients ir otrs lielākais. Savukārt Spānijas gadījumā Kopienas ieguldījums gan ir otrais lielākais, tomēr neizpildes koeficients ir ievērojami mazāks nekā vidējais, t.i., 51 %. Kā rāda Somijas un Grieķijas piemērs, nav arī pārliecinoša iemesla uzskatīt, ka pastāv apgriezta saistība. Arī maksimālā dalībvalstij piešķirtā ieguldījuma lielums nešķiet ietekmējam dalībvalsts programmas izpildi. 5.2. Saikne starp maksimālajiem ieguldījumiem un atceltajām saistībām Citāda aina paveras, ja aplūko nevis atcelto saistību relatīvo, bet absolūto lielumu, kas norādīts tabulas labās puses iedaļā. Salīdzinot šo sarindojumu ar to, kas balstīts uz maksimāliem ieguldījumiem katrai dalībvalstij, konstatējama nepārprotama saistība. Piecas valstis ar lielākajām maksimālā ieguldījuma summām (izņemot ar zvaigznīti atzīmētās dalībvalstis) vienlaikus ir arī piecas valstis ar visaugstākajām atcelto saistību summām. Lai gan šāds sadalījums ir skaidrojams ar saistību piešķiršanas struktūru (septiņas lielākās saņēmējas valstis saņem 87 % no kopējā maksimālā ieguldījuma), šo saikni tomēr varētu vājināt, ja valstis, kas ir galvenās ieguvējas no atbalsta shēmas, pastiprinātu centienus samazināt savus neizpildes koeficientus. Nākotnē būtu vēlams, lai visas dalībvalstis, kas saņem iepriekš minēto vidējo maksimālo ieguldījumu, parūpētos par to, lai to neizpildes koeficents būtu zemāks par vidējo. 5.3. Kontroles programmu nepietiekamas izpildes iemesli Iemesli, kāpēc būtiska daļa gada kontroles programmu netiek izpildītas, ir dažādi, un, tā kā dalībvalstis bieži vien par tiem neziņo vispār, nav iespējams veikt galveno iemeslu uzskaitījumu. Kopumā ņemot, ir divi būtiski izskaidrojumi, kāpēc projekti netiek pabeigti. 5.3.1. Dalībvalstis pārāk augstu novērtē savas budžeta iespējas Tas, cik bieži projektus atceļ dalībvalstis, kuras jau ir ieplānojušas lielu daļu savu izdevumu kontroles programmai, ko Komisija nav atzinusi par atbilstīgu finansējuma saņemšanai, norāda uz to, ka kontroles programmu darbības joma varētu būt pārāk plaša. Tāpēc būtu vēlams pieņemt pieticīgākas un reālistiskākas gada kontroles programmas. 5.3.2. Izdevumu neattiecināmība Otrs izskaidrojums ir tas, ka attiecīgie izdevumi nav attiecināmi. Tipiski piemēri ir projekti, kas iesaistīti noteiktā kontroles programmā, bet ir uzsākti jau pirms tā gada, uz kuru attiecas programma; šādos gadījumos Komisija vienmēr noraida attiecīgos atlīdzināšanas pieprasījumus. Šādas problēmas nerastos tik bieži, ja dalībvalstis rūpīgāk ievērotu noteikumus, ko piemēro attiecībā uz Kopienas finansējuma piešķiršanu zivsaimniecības kontrolei. Tāpat dalībvalstis vajadzētu mudināt sazināties ar Komisijas atbildīgajiem darbiniekiem gadījumos, ja rodas šaubas par konkrētu noteikumu izpildi, un nerīkoties, pamatojoties uz pieņēmumiem, kas var izrādīties nepareizi un kā rezultātā projektam var tikt atteikts Kopienas ieguldījums. Šajā sakarā jāpiezīmē, ka bieži vien izdevumu atlīdzināšanas kavēšanās iemesls ir sākotnēja neatbilstība noteikumiem par pierādījuma dokumentiem, kas jāpievieno katram izdevumu atlīdzināšanas pieprasījumam [10]. Pilnīga noteikumu ievērošana no dalībvalstu puses paātrinātu finansējuma izmaksu. 6. 2001.-2006. GADA KONTROLES PROGRAMMU IETEKME 16. panta b) punktā Padomes Lēmumā (EK) Nr. 465/2004, kas grozīts ar Padomes Lēmumu (EK) Nr. 2/2006, citstarp noteikta prasība sniegt vispārēju novērtējumu par Kopienas ieguldījumiem zivsaimniecības kontroles programmās visā 2001.-2006. gada laikposmā. Tomēr šis pienākums ir pilnībā izpildīts tikai dažu dalībvalstu ziņojumos [11]. Šāda neatbilstīgu ziņojumu sniegšana apgrūtina visaptveroša ietekmes novērtējuma veikšanu. Tomēr noteiktas iezīmes ir vērojamas ziņojumos, kas saņemti no vairāk nekā vienas dalībvalsts, tāpēc varētu uzskatīt, ka tās atspoguļo plašākas tendences. 6.1. Stimulējoša un ietaupījumus veicinoša ietekme Kopienas atbalstam, šķiet, ir būtiska ietekme uz dalībvalstu izdevumu tendencēm. Divas dalībvalstis skaidri norāda, ka tā vietā, lai samazinātu izdevumus, kas būtu radušies tik un tā, Kopienas līdzfinansējums ir pamudinājis tās īstenot projektus, kurus tās citādi nebūtu uzsākušas [12]. Dažos gadījumos dalībvalstis ES finansējuma rezultātā nav īstenojušas citādi nefinansējamus projektus, bet izvēlējušās kvalitatīvākus risinājumus [13] un/vai īstenojušas projektus agrāk [14]. 6.2. Saikne un darbību saskaņotība starp dalībvalstīm Otra līdzīga iezīme, kas sastopama daudzos ziņojumos, ir uzsvars uz saikni un darbību saskaņošanu, kas, spriežot pēc ziņojumiem, ir palielinājusies starp dalībvalstīm [15]. Apmaiņas programmas zvejas inspektoriem, kā arī jaunā programmatūra Zvejas uzraudzības centriem, kas ļauj dalībvalstīm viegli apmainīties ar informāciju, ir tikai divi no šādiem piemēriem. 6.3. Kvantitatīvā ietekme Papildus šai kvalitatīvajai ietekmei daudzas dalībvalstis uzsver arī Kopienas atbalsta kvantitatīvo ietekmi. Tas jo īpaši attiecas uz kontroles aprīkojumu (piemēram, kuģiem, lidaparātiem) un mācībām, kas ir palīdzējušas sagatavot daudzus jaunus darbiniekus zivsaimniecības kontroles darbam. 6.4. Kontroles programmu ietekme, izteikta skaitļos Vairums dalībvalstu, ziņojot par Kopienas atbalsta ietekmi, gan nesniedz konkrētus skaitļus, tomēr četras dalībvalstis izmanto skaitliskus rādītājus, kā paredzēts Padomes Lēmuma (EK) Nr. 465/2004 16. panta b) punkta iii) apakšpunktā. Spānija norāda ikgadējo inspekciju skaitu. Ar kuģi veikto inspekciju skaits no 320 inspekcijām 2001. gadā ir pieaudzis līdz 2612 inspekcijām 2006. gadā, kā rezultātā atklāto pārkāpumu skaits ir palielinājies no 129 pārkāpumiem 2001. gadā līdz 959 pārkāpumiem 2006. gadā. Itālijas iestādes ziņo, ka pārbaužu (ne tikai jūrā veikto) kopējais skaits tajā pašā laikposmā pieaudzis par 71 %. Arī šajā gadījumā ir konstatēta pozitīva ietekme, jo atklāto nopietnu pārkāpumu skaits ir pieaudzis par 58 % un atklāto administratīvo pārkāpumu skaits — par 26 %. Portugāles ziņojumā 2006. gadā novēroto un inspicēto kuģu skaits salīdzināts ar attiecīgajiem 2001. gada rādītājiem, demonstrējot iespaidīgu pieaugumu attiecīgi no 1432 līdz 33 975 un no 1929 līdz 6750. Igaunija ir sniegusi rādītāju attiecībā uz situācijas attīstību saistībā ar datu ziņošanas un reģistrēšanas pārkāpumiem laikā no 2004. līdz 2007. gadam. Tomēr, tā kā atklāto pārkāpumu skaits kopumā ir neliels, nav iespējams izdarīt statistiski pamatotus secinājumus. Vairāku iemeslu dēļ nav iespējams ekstrapolēt šajā iedaļā ziņotos datus, lai novērtētu ieguldījumu ietekmi uz citām dalībvalstīm. Tomēr šie skaitļi vismaz sniedz zināmu pamatu pieņēmumam, ka Kopienas atbalsts diezgan lielā mērā ietekmē dalībvalstu kontroles jaudas un ka tam ir tūlītēja ietekme uz kontroles iestāžu veikumu. 7. NOBEIGUMA IETEIKUMI Neraugoties uz konstatēto Kopienas atbalsta pozitīvo ietekmi uz zivsaimniecības kontroli, ziņojumā norādīti arī iespējamie uzlabojumi. Būtu veicami šādi praktiski pasākumi. Komisijas uzdevumi: · turpināt rūpīgi pārbaudīt arvien vairāk kuģu un lidaparātu būves un modernizēšanas projektu nepieciešamību; · turpmākajos finansēšanas lēmumos prioritāti piešķirt līdzfinansējumam saistībā ar datu automatizēšanu un pārvaldību, elektroniskajiem zvejas žurnāliem un VMS, kā arī mācībām un apmaiņas programmām, jo īpaši nelegālās zvejas jomā; · noslēgt saprašanās memorandus ar tām dalībvalstīm, kuras tos vēl nav parakstījušas [16]. Šo vienošanos mērķis ir noteikt vajadzīgos uzlabojumus nacionālajās kontroles sistēmās saistībā ar Kopienas finansiālo atbalstu zivsaimniecības kontrolei. Tādējādi tiks radīts pamats stratēģiskai riska analīzei un definēti kritēriji uzlabojumu veikšanai. Šie kritēriji aptvers visus ar inspekciju saistītos jautājumus, sākot no valsts tiesību aktiem līdz pat inspekcijas līdzekļiem un procedūrām vai VMS un citu datu izmantošanai. Turklāt tie noteiks, kādi uzlabojumi jāveic administratīvās kontroles un valsts organizatoriskās struktūras jomā, kā arī saistībā ar darbībām, kas veicamas pēc konstatētajiem pārkāpumiem. Dalībvalstu uzdevumi: · ierobežot gada kontroles programmas tā, lai būtu iespējams īstenot visus projektus; · (ES-10 valstīm) nekavēties veikt ieguldījumus kontroles darbinieku mācību un apmaiņas programmās; · vērst pārvaldes iestāžu uzmanību uz līdzfinansējuma iespēju tajās izdevumu kategorijās, kuras līdz šim nav daudz izmantotas dalībvalstu kontroles programmās. Īpaši lietderīgi būtu izveidot izdevumu novērtēšanas sistēmu, jo tā varētu palīdzēt dalībvalstīm sasniegt iepriekš norādītos mērķus attiecībā uz selektīvākām gada kontroles programmām; · nodrošināt to neizpildes koeficienta turpmāku samazināšanos. Uz dalībvalstīm, kurām paredzētais maksimālais ieguldījums pārsniedz vidējo, šajā ziņā gulstas īpaša atbildība, un tām vajadzētu rūpēties, lai to neizpildes koeficients nesasniegtu vidējo; · nodrošināt, ka par programmu īstenošanu atbildīgie darbinieki pilnībā pārzina izdevumu attiecināmības noteikumus, un tādējādi samazināt risku, ka Komisija atzīst par neattiecināmiem izdevumus, par kuriem pieprasīts atlīdzinājums; · nodrošināt ar Komisiju noslēgto saprašanās memorandu īstenošanu; · precīzi ievērot gada novērtējuma ziņojumu iesniegšanai noteikto formātu un termiņus. Annex I – Maximum contribution rates per Council Decision & actual contribution rates per Commission Financing Decision TYPES OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURE & MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION RATES (in %) | ACTUAL CONTRIBUTION RATES (in %) | Council Decision 2001/431/EC | Council Decision 2004/465/EC | Financing Decisions: | | | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | IT: | 65% | 50% | 65% | 50% | | | NEW TECHNOLOGIES: | 50%; 50%/100% for VMS, electr. logbook | 50% | 50%;>50% for VMS/logbook | >50% | | | | VMS/REPORT. DEVICES: | | for VMS: 50%/100% | | lump sum | | | TRAINING: | 50% | 50% | 50% | | NEW INSPECTION SCHEDULES: | n/a | 50% | n/a | 50% | 50% | | | | EQUIPMENT: | 35% | 25%;50% for new MS | 35% | 25%; 50% for new MS | | | EXPENDITURE ASSESSMENT: | 50% | n/a | 50% | 50% | 50% | | | | | SEMINARS: | | 75% | | >50% | | | | STUDIES: | | n/a | | 100% | | | Annex II – Ranking of the Member States regarding non-execution rate, maximum contribution & de-commitment (for the period 2001-03) Place | | Member State | Non-execution Rate | | Member State | Maximum Contribution (in EUR) | | Member State | De-commitment (in EUR) | 1 | | Austria | 95% | | Portugal* | 22.029.251 | | United Kingdom | 6.617.895 | 2 | | Belgium | 75% | | Spain | 16.717.903 | | Greece | 4.796.214 | 3 | | Denmark | 58% | | United Kingdom | 16.453.097 | | Spain | 4.773.458 | 4 | | Greece | 57% | | Italy | 10.568.802 | | Italy | 2.583.399 | 5 | | France | 57% | | Ireland* | 9.369.700 | | France | 2.387.880 | 6 | | Germany | 41% | | Greece | 8.455.000 | | Denmark | 1.917.704 | 7 | | United Kingdom | 40% | | France | 4.209.308 | | Germany | 473.615 | 8 | | Finland | 36% | | Sweden* | 3.891.863 | | Finland | 469.799 | 9 | | Spain | 29% | | Denmark | 3.304.734 | | Netherlands* | 343.294 | 10 | | Italy | 24% | | Netherlands* | 3.021.667 | | Belgium | 299.770 | 11 | | Netherlands* | 11% | | Finland | 1.300.320 | | Portugal* | 269.711 | 12 | | Portugal* | 1% | | Germany | 1.141.615 | | Austria | 27.336 | 13 | | Ireland* | 0% | | Belgium | 398.228 | | Ireland* | 0 | 14 | | Sweden* | 0% | | Austria | 28.889 | | Sweden* | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average: | 37%51%** | | Overall: | 100.890.377 | | Overall | 24.960.075 | * Member States with an outstanding commitments rate significantly higher than the overall outstanding commitments rate** average after the exclusion of the Member States indicated with an asterisk | Annex III [17] – Overview of the Execution of Community Funds per Member State for the Periods 2001-03 and 2004-06 respectively AUSTRIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 19.259 | 50% | 9.630 | 0 | 9.630 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 19.259 | 50% | 9.630 | 0 | 9.630 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 19.259 | 50% | 9.630 | 1.553 | 8.077 | 84 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 19.259 | | 9.630 | 0 | 9.630 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 19.259 | | 9.630 | 0 | 9.630 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 19.259 | | 9.630 | 1.553 | 8.077 | 84 | 0 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | AUSTRIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | BELGIUM | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 12.395 | 65% | 8.057 | 0 | 8.057 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 24.790 | 50% | 12.395 | 0 | 12.395 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 24.790 | 50% | 12.395 | 0 | 12.395 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 24.790 | 50% | 12.395 | 0 | 12.395 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 94.200 | 50% | 47.100 | 21.338 | 25.762 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 107.800 | 50%/100% | 91.650 | 41.175 | 50.475 | 55 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 9.914 | 50% | 4.957 | 0 | 4.957 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 9.914 | 50% | 4.957 | 0 | 4.957 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 9.914 | 50% | 4.957 | 0 | 4.957 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 223.105 | 35% | 78.087 | 0 | 78.087 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 463.020 | 35% | 121.279 | 35.945 | 85.334 | 70 | 0 | 0 | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 47.099 | | 25.409 | 0 | 25.409 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 352.009 | | 142.539 | 21.338 | 121.201 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 605.524 | | 230.281 | 77.120 | 153.161 | 67 | 0 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | BELGIUM | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 5.000 | 50% | 2.500 | 0 | 2.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 15.000 | 50% | 7.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.500 | 100 | 2006*** | 10.000 | 50% | 5.000 | 0 | 5.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 5.000 | 75% | 3.750 | 0 | 3.750 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 11.550.000 | 25% | 2.887.500 | 0 | 2.887.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 5.000 | | 2.500 | 0 | 2.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 11.565.000 | | 2.895.000 | 0 | 2.887.500 | 100 | 7.500 | 0 | 2006*** | 15.000 | | 8.750 | 0 | 8.750 | 100 | 0 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | CYPRUS | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 83.000 | 50% | 41.500 | 0 | 0 | | 41.500 | | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 107.800 | 50%/100% | 90.650 | 0 | 90.650 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 20.000 | 50% | 10.000 | 2.367 | 7633 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 15.000 | 50% | 7.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.500 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools: | 2004* | 30.000 | 75% | 22.500 | 998 | 21.502 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 1.400.000 | 50% | 700.000 | 0 | 700.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 2.300.000 | 50% | 1.150.000 | 575.000 | 0 | 0 | 575.000 | 50 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 1.557.800 | | 823.150 | 3.365 | 819.785 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 2.398.000 | | 1.199.000 | 575.000 | 0 | 0 | 624.000 | 52 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | DENMARK | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 30.000 | 65% | 19.500 | 19.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.580.000 | 50% | 790.000 | 476.582 | 313.418 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 640.000 | 50% | 320.000 | 82.499 | 237.501 | 74 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 380.000 | 50%/100% | 195.000 | 107.506 | 87.494 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.780.000 | 50% | 890.000 | 1.569 | 888.431 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 1.159.968 | 50%/100% | 920.234 | 556.751 | 363.483 | 39 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 80.000 | 50% | 40.000 | 39.198 | 802 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 160.000 | 50% | 80.000 | 67.391 | 12.609 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 100.000 | 50% | 50.000 | 36.035 | 13.965 | 28 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 490.000 | | 254.500 | 166.204 | 88.296 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 3.520.000 | | 1.760.000 | 545.542 | 1.214.458 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 1.899.968 | | 1.290.234 | 675.285 | 614.949 | 48 | 0 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | DENMARK | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 271.000 | 50% | 135.500 | 80.288 | 55.212 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 525.000 | 50% | 262.500 | 158.695 | 0 | 0 | 103.805 | 40 | 2006*** | 1.333.334 | 50% | 666.667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 666.667 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 482.142 | 50%/100% | 401.571 | 333.075 | 68.496 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 750.000 | 50% | 375.000 | 375.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 275.000 | 50% | 137.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 137.500 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 56.500 | 50% | 28.250 | 16.927 | 11323 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 150.000 | 50% | 75.000 | 64.148 | 0 | 0 | 10.852 | 14 | 2006*** | 523.199 | 50% | 261.600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 261.600 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 93.333 | 50% | 46.667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46.667 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 40.000 | 75% | 30.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.000 | 100 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 809.642 | | 565.321 | 430.291 | 135.030 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 1.465.000 | | 742.500 | 597.843 | 0 | 0 | 144.657 | 19 | 2006*** | 2.224.866 | | 1.112.434 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.112.434 | 100 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | ESTONIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 229.217 | 50% | 114.609 | 65.875 | 48.734 | 43 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 115.050 | 50%/100% | 101.775 | 0 | 101.775 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 9.590 | 50% | 4.795 | 0 | 4795 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 13.195 | 50% | 6.598 | 641 | 5.956 | 90 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 300.704 | 50% | 150.352 | 106.551 | 43.801 | 29 | 0 | 0 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 124.640 | | 106.570 | 0 | 106.570 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 543.116 | | 271.558 | 173.067 | 98.491 | 36 | 0 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | FINLAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 176.597 | 65% | 114.788 | 97.232 | 17.556 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 264.896 | 50% | 132.448 | 76.212 | 56.236 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 900.000 | 50% | 450.000 | 450.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 248.918 | 50%/100% | 194.824 | 33.610 | 161.214 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 160.788 | 50%/100% | 153.688 | 102.330 | 51.358 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 310.000 | 50%/100% | 163.000 | 30.832 | 132.168 | 81 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 26.910 | 50% | 13.455 | 5.119 | 8.336 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 30.274 | 50% | 15.137 | 7.181 | 7.956 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 20.000 | 50% | 10.000 | 5.140 | 4.860 | 49 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 33.638 | 35% | 11.773 | 0 | 11.773 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 117.732 | 35% | 41.206 | 22.864 | 18.342 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 486.063 | | 334.840 | 135.961 | 198.879 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 573.690 | | 342.479 | 208.587 | 133.892 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 1.230.000 | | 623.000 | 485.972 | 137.028 | 22 | 0 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | FINLAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 545.000 | 50% | 272.500 | 17.943 | 254.557 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 600.000 | 50% | 300.000 | 25.760 | 274.240 | 91 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 402.000 | 50% | 201.000 | 87.628 | 0 | 0 | 113.372 | 56 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 190.800 | 50%/100% | 108.000 | 78.000 | 30.000 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 33.000 | 50%/100% | 22.820 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.820 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 30.000 | 50% | 15.000 | 3.147 | 11853 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 30.000 | 50% | 15.000 | 4.092 | 10.908 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 24.200 | 50% | 12.100 | 2.405 | 0 | 0 | 9.695 | 80 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 105.000 | 25% | 26.250 | 23.929 | 2.321 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 870.800 | | 421.750 | 123.018 | 298.732 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 630.000 | | 315.000 | 29.852 | 285.148 | 91 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 459.200 | | 235.920 | 90.033 | 0 | 0 | 145.887 | 62 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | FRANCE | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 153.000 | 65% | 99.450 | 0 | 99.450 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.000.000 | 50% | 500.000 | 0 | 500.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 153.000 | 50% | 76.500 | 33.975 | 0 | 0 | 42.525 | 56 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 2.100.000 | 50%/100% | 1.500.000 | 160.165 | 750.000 | 50 | 589.835 | 39 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 305.000 | 50% | 152.500 | 6.070 | 146.430 | | | | 2003*** | 70.000 | 50% | 35.000 | 15.000 | 10.000 | 29 | 10.000 | 29 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 2.520.000 | 35% | 882.000 | 0 | 882.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 2.520.000 | 35% | 882.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 882.000 | 100 | 2003*** | 233.881 | 35% | 81.858 | 81.858 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 2.673.000 | | 981.450 | 0 | 981.450 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 3.825.000 | | 1.534.500 | 6.070 | 646.430 | 42 | 882.000 | 57 | 2003*** | 2.556.881 | | 1.693.358 | 290.998 | 760.000 | 45 | 642.360 | 38 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | FRANCE | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 1.800.000 | 50%/40% | 750.000 | 743.830 | 0 | 0 | 6.170 | 1 | 2005** | 150.000 | 50% | 75.000 | 75.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 935.000 | 50% | 467.500 | 177.327 | 0 | 0 | 290.173 | 62 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 2.047.500 | 50%/100% | 1.365.000 | 363.626 | 0 | 0 | 1.001.374 | 73 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 130.000 | 50% | 65.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65.000 | 100 | 2005** | 34.050 | 50% | 17.025 | 4.622 | 12.403 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 58.350 | 50% | 29.175 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.175 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 286.000 | 25% | 71.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71.500 | 100 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 3.977.500 | | 2.180.000 | 1.107.456 | 0 | 0 | 1.072.544 | 49 | 2005** | 470.050 | | 163.525 | 79.622 | 12.403 | 8 | 71.500 | 44 | 2006*** | 993.350 | | 496.675 | 177.327 | 0 | 0 | 319.348 | 64 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | GERMANY | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 127.823 | 50% | 63.912 | 63.912 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 360.000 | 50% | 180.000 | 54.913 | 125.087 | 69 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 127.823 | 50% | 63.912 | 46.293 | 17.618 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 595.824 | 50% | 297.912 | 149.675 | 129.069 | 43 | 19.168 | 6 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 34.257 | 50% | 17.129 | 4.151 | 12.978 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 47.113 | 50% | 23.557 | 8.954 | 14.602 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 20.713 | 50% | 10.357 | 6.312 | 4.045 | 39 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 100.842 | 35% | 35.295 | 30.619 | 4.676 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 934.408 | 35% | 327.043 | 278.963 | 48.079 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 350.000 | 35% | 122.500 | 5.039 | 117.461 | 96 | 0 | 0 | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 262.922 | | 116.335 | 81.063 | 35.272 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.109.344 | | 414.512 | 351.829 | 62.681 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 1.326.537 | | 610.769 | 215.939 | 375.661 | 62 | 19.168 | 3 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | GERMANY | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 235.000 | 50% | 117.500 | 11.056 | 0 | 0 | 106.444 | 91 | 2005** | 50.000 | 50% | 25.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.000 | 100 | 2006*** | 210.000 | 50% | 105.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 105.000 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 780.000 | 50%/100% | 585.000 | 341.250 | 0 | 0 | 243.750 | 42 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 52.500 | 50% | 26.250 | 1.012 | 0 | 0 | 25.238 | 96 | 2005** | 52.100 | 50% | 26.050 | 3.002 | 0 | 0 | 23.048 | 88 | 2006*** | 64.000 | 50% | 32.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.000 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 77.798 | 25% | 19.449 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.449 | 100 | 2005** | 51.331.250 | 25% | 12.832.813 | 17.231 | 0 | 0 | 12.815.581 | 100 | 2006*** | 900.000 | 25% | 225.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 225.000 | 100 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 1.145.298 | | 748.199 | 353.318 | 0 | 0 | 394.881 | 53 | 2005** | 51.433.350 | | 12.883.863 | 20.233 | 0 | 0 | 12.863.629 | 100 | 2006*** | 1.174.000 | | 362.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 362.000 | 100 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | GREECE | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 1.000.000 | 65% | 650.000 | 0 | 650.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 205.960 | 0 | 0 | 544.040 | 73 | 2003*** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 750.000 | 100 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 1.400.000 | 50% | 700.000 | 19.030 | 680.970 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 0 | 325.000 | 43 | 425.000 | 57 | 2003*** | 2.926.000 | 50%/100% | 1.335.000 | 618.101 | 266.974 | 20 | 449.925 | 34 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 141.088 | 608912 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 26.391 | 723.609 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 1.500.000 | 50% | 750.000 | 6.086 | 664.947 | 89 | 78.967 | 11 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 1.100.000 | 35% | 385.000 | 0 | 179.200 | 47 | 205.800 | 53 | 2003*** | 1.100.000 | 35% | 385.000 | 0 | 385.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 300.000 | 50% | 150.000 | 90.254 | 59746 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 300.000 | 50% | 150.000 | 0 | 150.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 400.000 | 50% | 200.000 | 0 | 101.856 | 51 | 98.144 | 49 | TOTAL: | 2001* | 4.200.000 | | 2.250.000 | 250.372 | 1.999.628 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 5.900.000 | | 2.785.000 | 232.351 | 1.377.809 | 49 | 1.174.840 | 42 | 2003*** | 7.426.000 | | 3.420.000 | 624.187 | 1.418.777 | 41 | 1.377.036 | 40 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | GREECE | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 310.000 | 50% | 155.000 | 0 | 155.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 2.250.000 | 50% | 1.125.000 | 0 | 1.125.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 2.569.600 | 50%/100% | 876000 | 423.000 | 0 | 0 | 453.000 | 52 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 200.000 | 50% | 100.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.000 | 100 | 2005** | 370.000 | 50% | 185.000 | 0 | 185.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 40.000 | 50% | 20.000 | 0 | 20.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 200.000 | 75% | 150.000 | 0 | 150.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 75.000 | 75% | 56.250 | 0 | 56.250 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 660.860 | 75% | 495.645 | 0 | 495.645 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 1.050.000 | 25% | 262.500 | 0 | 262.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 2.301.312 | 25% | 575.328 | 0 | 575.328 | 100 | 0 | 0 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 4.019.600 | | 1.388.500 | 423.000 | 412.500 | 30 | 553.000 | 40 | 2005** | 795.000 | | 416.250 | 0 | 416.250 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 5.212.172 | | 2.195.973 | 0 | 2.195.973 | 100 | 0 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | IRELAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 902.921 | 65% | 586.899 | 586.899 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 3.813.702 | 50% | 1.906.851 | 1.906.851 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 615.552 | 50% | 307.776 | 282.381 | 0 | 0 | 25.395 | 8 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 690.000 | 50%/100% | 450.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 450.000 | 100 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 133.323 | 50% | 66.662 | 28.081 | 0 | 0 | 38.581 | 58 | 2002** | 166.970 | 50% | 83.485 | 47.049 | 0 | 0 | 36.436 | 44 | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 1.539.057 | 35% | 538.670 | 101.934 | 0 | 0 | 436.736 | 81 | 2002** | 5.892.034 | 35% | 2.062.212 | 1.923.687 | 0 | 0 | 138.525 | 7 | 2003*** | 10.181.919 | 35% | 3.367.146 | 350.573 | 0 | 0 | 3.016.572 | 90 | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 2.575.301 | | 1.192.231 | 716.914 | 0 | 0 | 475.316 | 40 | 2002** | 9.872.706 | | 4.052.548 | 3.877.587 | 0 | 0 | 174.961 | 4 | 2003*** | 11.487.471 | | 4.124.922 | 632.954 | 0 | 0 | 3.491.967 | 85 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | IRELAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 2.000.000 | 50% | 1.000.000 | 723.061 | 0 | 0 | 276.939 | 28 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 250.000 | 50% | 125.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 125.000 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 552.000 | 50%/100% | 360.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 360.000 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 200.000 | 50% | 100.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.000 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 1.000.000 | 25% | 250.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 250.000 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 3.552.000 | | 1.610.000 | 723.061 | 0 | 0 | 886.939 | 55 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 450.000 | | 225.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 225.000 | 100 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | ITALY | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 2.223.026 | 65% | 1.444.967 | 939.228 | 0 | 0 | 505.739 | 35 | 2002** | 1.755.953 | 50% | 877.977 | 0 | 877.977 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 1.755.953 | 50% | 877.977 | 438.989 | 438.989 | 50 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 13.620.747 | 50%/100% | 4.415.200 | 3.826.100 | 112.500 | 3 | 476.600 | 11 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 1.188.367 | 50% | 594.184 | 560.549 | 33.634 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.373.775 | 50% | 686.887 | 28.182 | 142.248 | 21 | 516.457 | 75 | 2003*** | 1.142.116 | 50% | 571.058 | 285.529 | 0 | 0 | 285.529 | 50 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 1.394.434 | 35% | 488.052 | 0 | 488.052 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.400.000 | 35% | 490.000 | 0 | 490.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 350.000 | 35% | 122.500 | 122.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 4.805.827 | | 2.527.203 | 1.499.778 | 521.686 | 21 | 505.739 | 20 | 2002** | 4.529.728 | | 2.054.864 | 28.182 | 1.510.225 | 73 | 516.457 | 25 | 2003*** | 16.868.816 | | 5.986.735 | 4.673.118 | 551.489 | 9 | 762.129 | 13 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | ITALY | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 1.755.953 | 50% | 877.977 | 0 | 877.977 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 1.783.200 | 50% | 891.600 | 445.800 | 0 | 0 | 445.800 | 50 | 2006*** | 4.000.000 | 50% | 2.000.000 | 1.000.000 | 0 | 0 | 1.000.000 | 50 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 9.984.000 | 50%/100% | 3.744.000 | 1.872.000 | 0 | 0 | 1.872.000 | 50 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 265.000 | 50% | 132.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 132.500 | 100 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 1.270.816 | 50% | 635.408 | 486.699 | 75763 | 12 | 72.946 | 11 | 2005** | 1.191.075 | 50% | 595.538 | 51.451 | 0 | 0 | 544.086 | 91 | 2006*** | 1.000.000 | 50% | 500.000 | 39.769 | 0 | 0 | 460.231 | 92 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 13.010.769 | | 5.257.385 | 2.358.699 | 953.740 | 18 | 1.944.946 | 37 | 2005** | 3.239.275 | | 1.619.638 | 497.251 | 0 | 0 | 1.122.386 | 69 | 2006*** | 5.000.000 | | 2.500.000 | 1.039.769 | 0 | 0 | 1.460.231 | 58 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | LATVIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 23.300 | 50% | 11.650 | 0 | 11.650 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 23.300 | | 11.650 | 0 | 11.650 | 100 | 0 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | LITHUANIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 110.000 | 50% | 55.000 | 48.846 | 0 | 0 | 6.154 | 11 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 30.000 | 50% | 15.000 | 11.618 | 0 | 0 | 3.382 | 23 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 30.000 | 50%/100% | 22.500 | 0 | 22.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 20.000 | 50% | 10.000 | 3.524 | 0 | 0 | 6.476 | 65 | 2005** | 12.000 | 50% | 6.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.000 | 100 | 2006*** | 11.000 | 50% | 5.500 | 1.459 | 0 | 0 | 4.041 | 73 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 10.000 | 75% | 7.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.500 | 100 | 2005** | 8.000 | 75% | 6.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.000 | 100 | 2006*** | 9.000 | 75% | 6.750 | 693 | 0 | 0 | 6.057 | 90 | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 210.000 | 50% | 105.000 | 0 | 105.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 500.000 | 50% | 250.000 | 250.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 170.000 | | 95.000 | 52.370 | 22.500 | 24 | 20.130 | 21 | 2005** | 230.000 | | 117.000 | 0 | 105.000 | 90 | 12.000 | 10 | 2006*** | 550.000 | | 277.250 | 263.771 | 0 | 0 | 13.479 | 5 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | MALTA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 96.763 | 50% | 48.381 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48.381 | 100 | 2005** | 577.446 | 50% | 288.723 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 288.723 | 100 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 321.943 | 50%/100% | 159.000 | 146.999 | 0 | 0 | 12.001 | 8 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 190.944 | 50%/100% | 132.972 | 132.538 | 0 | 0 | 434 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 600.901 | 50% | 300.451 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300.451 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 8.196 | 50% | 4.098 | 4.098 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 600.000 | 50% | 300.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300.000 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 1.619.607 | | 807.832 | 146.999 | 0 | 0 | 660.833 | 82 | 2005** | 577.446 | | 288.723 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 288.723 | 100 | 2006*** | 199.140 | | 137.070 | 136.636 | 0 | 0 | 434 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | NETHER- LANDS | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 794.115 | 65% | 516.175 | 358.570 | 157.605 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.025.543 | 50% | 512.772 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 512.772 | 100 | 2003*** | 443.732 | 50% | 221.866 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 221.866 | 100 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 324.453 | 50% | 162.227 | 0 | 162.227 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 176.974 | 50% | 88.487 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88.487 | 100 | 2003*** | 1.074.406 | 100% | 761.953 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 761.953 | 100 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 127.421 | 50% | 63.711 | 40.248 | 23.463 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 208.512 | 50% | 104.256 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 104.256 | 100 | 2003*** | 68.680 | 50% | 34.340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34.340 | 100 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 1.588.231 | 35% | 555.881 | 555.881 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 2.834.220 | | 1.297.994 | 954.699 | 343.294 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.411.029 | | 705.515 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 705.515 | 100 | 2003*** | 1.586.818 | | 1.018.159 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.018.159 | 100 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | NETHER- LANDS | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 310.325 | 50% | 155.163 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 155.163 | 100 | 2005** | 417.325 | 50% | 208.663 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 208.663 | 100 | 2006*** | 470.505 | 50% | 235.253 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 235.253 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 722.500 | 50%/100% | 488.750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 488.750 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 139.674 | 50% | 69.837 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69.837 | 100 | 2005** | 178.620 | 50% | 89.310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89.310 | 100 | 2006*** | 144.093 | 50% | 72.047 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72.047 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 565.000 | 25% | 141.250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 141.250 | 100 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 1.172.499 | | 713.750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 713.750 | 100 | 2005** | 595.945 | | 297.973 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 297.973 | 100 | 2006*** | 1.179.598 | | 448.550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 448.549 | 100 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | PORTUGAL | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 2.663.406 | 65% | 1.731.214 | 1.244.154 | 0 | 0 | 487.060 | 28 | 2002** | 42.000 | 50% | 21.000 | 8.506 | 0 | 0 | 12.494 | 59 | 2003*** | 74.820 | 50% | 37.410 | 0 | 37.410 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 240.666 | 50%/100% | 145.828 | 24.939 | 26.051 | 18 | 94.838 | 65 | 2002** | 5.258.250 | 50% | 2.629.125 | 1.207.750 | 206.250 | 8 | 1.215.125 | 46 | 2003*** | 1.939.868 | 50%/100% | 1.218.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.218.000 | 100 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 764.705 | 50% | 382.353 | 3.100 | 0 | 0 | 379.253 | 99 | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 6.610.230 | 35% | 2.313.581 | 835.351 | 0 | 0 | 1.478.230 | 64 | 2002** | 38.602.391 | 35% | 13.510.837 | 773.205 | 0 | 0 | 12.737.632 | 94 | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 79.808 | 50% | 39.904 | 39.882 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 10.358.815 | | 4.612.880 | 2.147.426 | 26.051 | 1 | 2.439.403 | 53 | 2002** | 43.902.641 | | 16.160.962 | 1.989.462 | 206.250 | 1 | 13.965.250 | 86 | 2003*** | 2.014.688 | | 1.255.410 | 0 | 37.410 | 3 | 1.218.000 | 97 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | PORTUGAL | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 2.291.616 | 50% | 1.145.808 | 0 | 118.500 | 10 | 1.027.308 | 90 | 2005** | 2.568.260 | 50% | 1.284.130 | 0 | 1.284.130 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 667.790 | 50% | 333.895 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 333.895 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 586.000 | 50% | 293.000 | 0 | 293.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 249.700 | 50% | 124.850 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 124.850 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 102.967 | 50% | 51.484 | 0 | 51484 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 95.588 | 50% | 47.794 | 0 | 47.794 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 25.600 | 50% | 12.800 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.800 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 94.910 | 50% | 47.455 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47.455 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 50.000 | 50% | 25.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.000 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 75.000 | 75% | 56.250 | 0 | 56.250 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 68.750 | 75% | 51.563 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51.563 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 4.630.000 | 25% | 1.157.500 | 0 | 1.157.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 720.000 | 25% | 180.000 | 0 | 180.000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 16.442.150 | 25% | 4.110.537 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.110.537 | 100 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 7.755.493 | | 2.720.247 | 0 | 1.620.484 | 60 | 1.099.763 | 40 | 2005** | 3.458.848 | | 1.568.174 | 0 | 1.568.174 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2006*** | 17.453.990 | | 4.633.645 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.633.645 | 100 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | POLAND | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 60.000 | 50% | 30.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.000 | 100 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 585.000 | 50%/100% | 468.000 | 342.999 | 125.001 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 150.000 | 50% | 75.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.000 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 200.000 | 75% | 150.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150.000 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 3.600.000 | 50% | 1.800.000 | 33.081 | 0 | 0 | 1.766.919 | 98 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2004* | 585.000 | | 468.000 | 342.999 | 125.001 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 3.660.000 | | 1.830.000 | 33.081 | 0 | 0 | 1.796.919 | 98 | 2006*** | 350.000 | | 225.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 225.000 | 100 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | SLOVENIA | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 250.354 | 50% | 125.177 | 72.248 | 52.929 | 42 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 48.000 | 50% | 24.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.000 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 25.760 | 50%/100% | 18.880 | 11.958 | 6.922 | 37 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 35.808 | 50% | 17.904 | 446 | 17.458 | 98 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 6.008 | 75% | 4.506 | 428 | 4.078 | 91 | 0 | 0 | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 50.792 | 50% | 25.396 | 1.982 | 23.414 | 92 | 0 | 0 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 48.000 | | 24.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.000 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 368.722 | | 191.863 | 87.062 | 104.801 | 55 | 0 | 0 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | SPAIN | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 521.752 | 65% | 339.138 | 16.100 | 323.039 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 1.762.821 | 50% | 881.410 | 18.030 | 863.380 | 98 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 923.812 | 50% | 461.906 | 156.149 | 18.631 | 4 | 287.126 | 62 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 40.000 | 50%/100% | 29.000 | 18.850 | 10.150 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 321.654 | 50% | 160.827 | 55.650 | 105.177 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 3.905.470 | 50%/100% | 2.477.735 | 1.964.840 | 512.896 | 21 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 76.857 | 50% | 38.429 | 3.874 | 34.554 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 221.172 | 50% | 110.586 | 9.725 | 100.861 | 91 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 239.793 | 50% | 119.897 | 8.791 | 111.106 | 93 | 0 | 0 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 11.827.663 | 35% | 4.139.682 | 3.461.836 | 677.846 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 14.648.841 | 35% | 5.127.094 | 3.629.765 | 1.497.329 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 15.118.519 | 35% | 2.832.199 | 2.313.710 | 518.489 | 18 | 0 | 0 | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 12.466.272 | | 4.546.249 | 3.500.660 | 1.045.589 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 16.954.488 | | 6.279.917 | 3.713.170 | 2.566.747 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 20.187.594 | | 5.891.737 | 4.443.489 | 1.161.122 | 20 | 287.126 | 5 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | SPAIN | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 719.828 | 50% | 359.914 | 322.440 | 0 | 0 | 37.474 | 10 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 2.866.500 | 50%/100% | 1.911.000 | 1.057.500 | 853.500 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 183.703 | 50% | 91.852 | 12.342 | 79510 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 230.236 | 50% | 115.118 | 20.019 | 0 | 0 | 95.099 | 83 | 2006*** | 86.640 | 50% | 43.320 | 15.703 | 0 | 0 | 27.617 | 64 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 6.000 | 75% | 4.500 | 0 | 4.500 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 6.000 | 75% | 4.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.500 | 100 | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 22.238.597 | 25% | 5.559.649 | 5.436.071 | 123.578 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 4.350.804 | 25% | 1.087.701 | 589.870 | 0 | 0 | 497.831 | 46 | 2006*** | 24.683.674 | 25% | 6.170.918 | 4.393.144 | 0 | 0 | 1.777.775 | 29 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 25.294.799 | | 7.567.001 | 6.505.913 | 1.061.087 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2005** | 5.306.868 | | 1.567.233 | 932.329 | 0 | 0 | 634.904 | 41 | 2006*** | 24.770.314 | | 6.214.238 | 4.408.847 | 0 | 0 | 1.805.392 | 29 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | SWEDEN | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 316.905 | 65% | 205.988 | 202.498 | 0 | 0 | 3.491 | 2 | 2002** | 316.905 | 50% | 158.453 | 21.856 | 0 | 0 | 136.597 | 86 | 2003*** | 766.904 | 50% | 383.452 | 9.916 | 0 | 0 | 373.536 | 97 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 327.833 | 50%/100% | 305.285 | 113.748 | 0 | 0 | 191.537 | 63 | 2002** | 273.195 | 50%/100% | 191.237 | 54.639 | 0 | 0 | 136.598 | 71 | 2003*** | 611.415 | 50%/100% | 469.945 | 2.829 | 0 | 0 | 467.116 | 99 | Art. 2(c): training of staff: | 2001* | 16.392 | 50% | 8.888 | 8.888 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 49.174 | 50% | 24.587 | 2.867 | 0 | 0 | 21.720 | 88 | 2003*** | 27.319 | 50% | 13.660 | 832 | 0 | 0 | 12.828 | 94 | Art. 2(d): implementation of new inspection and observer schedules in framework of RFOs: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 2(e): acquisition / modernisation of control, inspection, surveillance equipment: | 2001* | 1.016.282 | 35% | 355.699 | 267.812 | 0 | 0 | 87.886 | 25 | 2002** | 611.955 | 35% | 214.184 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 214.184 | 100 | 2003*** | 4.458.529 | 35% | 1.560.485 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.560.485 | 100 | Art. 10: implementation of an expenditure assessment system: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0 | | | | | | | | TOTAL: | 2001* | 1.677.412 | | 875.860 | 592.947 | 0 | 0 | 282.914 | 32 | 2002** | 1.251.229 | | 588.461 | 79.362 | 0 | 0 | 509.098 | 87 | 2003*** | 5.864.167 | | 2.427.542 | 13.578 | 0 | 0 | 2.413.964 | 99 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2002/5/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2002/6/EC and 2002/978/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2003/566/EC (amended by 2004/64/EC) and 2004/65/EC. | SWEDEN | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(a): new technologies and IT networks: | 2004* | 87.430 | 50% | 43.715 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43.715 | 100 | 2005** | 111.200 | 50% | 55.600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55.600 | 100 | 2006*** | 120.000 | 50% | 60.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60.000 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(b)(i): electronic localisation devices: | 2004* | 262.320 | 50%/100% | 176.160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 176.160 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(c): pilot projects on new technologies: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 166.070 | 50% | 83.035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83.035 | 100 | 2006*** | 130.000 | 50% | 65.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65.000 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(d): training: | 2004* | 132.790 | 50% | 66.395 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66.395 | 100 | 2005** | 40.000 | 50% | 20.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.000 | 100 | 2006*** | 22.000 | 50% | 11.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.000 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(e): pilot inspection and observer schemes: | 2004* | 474.400 | 50% | 237.200 | 20.704 | 0 | 0 | 216.496 | 91 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(f): cost/benefit analysis and assessment of expenditure: | 2004* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 0 | | | | | | | | Art. 4(1)(g): seminars and media tools | 2004* | 230.000 | 75% | 172.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 172.500 | 100 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 210.000 | 75% | 157.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 157.500 | 100 | Art. 4(1)(h): patrol vessels and aircraft: | 2004* | 5.700.000 | 25% | 1.425.000 | 76.008 | 0 | 0 | 1.348.992 | 95 | 2005** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2006*** | 18.000.000 | 25% | 4.500.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.500.000 | 100 | TOTAL: | 2004* | 6.886.940 | | 2.120.970 | 96.712 | 0 | 0 | 2.024.258 | 95 | 2005** | 317.270 | | 158.635 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 158.635 | 100 | 2006*** | 18.482.000 | | 4.793.500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.793.500 | 100 | *The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decisions 2004/930/EC and 2004/690/EC. **The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2005/424/EC. ***The eligible expenditure and the maximum community contribution are determined by Commission Decision 2006/392/EC. | UNITED KINGDOM | Eligible Expenditure | Contribution Rate | Maximum Contribution | Contribution Paid | Decommitted Expenditure | Decommitted Expenditure as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | Outstanding Commitments | Outstanding Commitments as a Percentage of the Maximum Contribution | | | | | | | | | | Art. 2(a): IT equipment: | 2001* | 232.404 | 65% | 151.063 | 86.342 | 64721 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 2002** | 132.802 | 50% | 66.401 | 66.401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2003*** | 527.662 | 50% | 263.831 | 150.367 | 0 | 0 | 113.464 | 43 | Art. 2(b): experimentation with / implementation of new technologies for fisheries control: | 2001* | 0 | | | | | | | | 2002** | 0 | | | | | | | | 2003*** | 0