Briselē, 22.10.2004

COM(2004)707 galīgā redakcija

KOMISIJAS PAZIŅOJUMS PADOMEI UN EIROPAS PARLAMENTAM

Par ES Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas un Rīcības plāna narkotiku jomā nobeiguma novērtējuma rezultātiem (2000-2004)

1. ES NARKOTIKU APKAROšANAS STRATēģIJA UN RīCīBAS PLāNS NARKOTIKU JOMā (2000 - 2004)

1999. gadā Komisija iesniedza Paziņojumu par Eiropas Savienības Rīcības plānu narkotiku jomā (2000 - 2004)[1]. Uz tā pamata Helsinku Eiropadome apstiprināja ES Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģiju no 2000. līdz 2004. gadam[2]. Stratēģija aicina izveidot starpnozaru un integrētu pieeju narkotiku apkarošanai, turklāt narkotiku pieprasījuma un patēriņa samazināšana ir uzskatāmas par vienlīdz svarīgām un savstarpēji papildinošām līdzsvarotas stratēģijas daļām.

2000. gada jūnijā Feira Eiropadome pieņēmuma ES rīcības plānu narkotiku jomā no 2000. līdz 2004. gadam[3]. Šis rīcības plāns interpretēja ES Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģiju apmēram simts konkrētās darbībās, kas jāveic dalībvalstīm, Komisijai, Eiropas Narkotiku un narkomānijas uzraudzības centram (EMCDDA) un Eiropolam.

Rīcības plānā ir izklāstīts, ka Komisijai jāorganizē piemērots termiņa vidus novērtējums līdz ES Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas 2000-2004. beigām. Komisija 2002. gada novembrī iesniedza Paziņojumu par termiņa vidus novērtējumu[4].

Šis Paziņojums iepazīstina ar nobeiguma novērtējuma rezultātiem un liek pamatus nākotnes ES politikas attīstībai narkotiku apkarošanas jomā uz tās pieredzes pamata, kas gūta no pašreizējās politikas īstenošanas.

2. NOBEIGUMA NOVēRTēJUMA MēRķIS UN PROCESS

2.1. Mērķis

Nobeiguma novērtējuma mērķis ir izvērtēt sasniegumu līmeni darbībām, kas paredzētas Rīcības plānā, izvērtēt pakāpi, kādā Narkotiku stratēģijas mērķi tiek sasniegt un novērtēt gan Narkotiku stratēģijas, gan Rīcības plāna ietekmi uz narkotiku situāciju Eiropas Savienībā.

Narkotiku apkarošanas politikas ietekmes novērtējums vēl joprojām tiek izstrādāts un precīzu un skaitlisku operatīvu mērķu trūkums pašreizējā Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijā un rīcības plānā sarežģī šo uzdevumu. Tomēr ir sācies ietekmes novērtējuma process un pamatindikatoru un mehānismu definēšana, kas nākotnē varētu noteikt kvalitātes standartu, lai izstrādātu jaunas stratēģijas un politikas.

2.2. Process

Novērtējumu uzsāka 2003. gada aprīlī ar vadības grupas izveidi (sastāv no Komisijas pārstāvjiem, četrām dalībvalstīm, kuras ir prezidējošās valstis laikposmā no 2003. - 2004. gadam, EMCDDA un Eiropola), lai uzraudzītu un nodrošinātu ar vadību izdarot gala novērtējumu. Šī grupa ir satikusies četras reizes, lai noteiktu novērtējuma mehānismus un metodes un uzraudzītu procesu.

Dalībvalstīm 2003. gada novembrī tika nosūtīta aptaujas lapa [5], lai iegūtu sīkāku informāciju par darbībām, kuru īstenošana ir noteikta Rīcības plānā (1. pielikums). Līdzīga paveiktā darba kontroles tabula tika nosūtīta iesaistītajiem Komisijas dienestiem, EMCDDA un Eiropolam (2. pielikums).

Vairākus tematiskos dokumentus sagatavoja EMCDDA un Komisija koncentrējoties uz īpašiem narkotiku jautājuma aspektiem[6]. EMCDDA kopā ar Eiropolu izveidoja statisko momentuzņēmumu, kas satur pamatdatus par narkotiku situāciju 1999. un 2002-2003. gadā[7].

Eirobarometra aptauja tika veikta 2004. gada aprīlī/maijā par jaunu cilvēku attieksmi/uztveri pret narkotikām[8]. Galvenie iegūtie rezultāti ir salīdzināti ar līdzīgas 2002. gadā veiktas aptaujas rezultātiem. Papildus tika ņemts vērā nobeiguma ziņojums par tiesībaizsardzību un tās nozīmi cīņā ar narkotiku tirdzniecību[9], īstenošanas plāni, kas paredz sintētisko narkotiku piegādes[10] un pieprasījuma un piedāvājuma samazināšanu[11], Padomes apstiprināts ziņojums par īstenošanas procesa attīstību[12] un citas uzsāktās iniciatīvas (3. pielikums).

No dažādiem avotiem iegūtie tika analizēti, lai izceltu galvenos sasniegumus laikposmā un izceltu jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība. Tie tika arī izmantoti, lai novērtētu darbību, kas noteiktas rīcības plānā, sasniegumu līmeni un novērtētu to, kādā mērā rīcības plāna sasniegumi atbilst narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas mērķiem. Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas un rīcības plāna par narkotiku situāciju ietekmes novērtējuma pamatā ir aktuālie statistiskie dati. Dati, kas iesniegti nobeiguma novērtējumam, attiecas uz laikposmu no 1999. gada līdz 2004. gada jūnijam.

3. GALVENIE SASNIEGUMI UN JOMAS, KURĀS IR VAJADZĪGA TĀLĀKA ATTĪSTĪBA

3.1. Koordinēšana

Sasniegumi nacionālā līmenī

- Kopš 1999. gada dalībvalstis ir pieņēmušas pilnveidotākas nacionālās narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas. Lielākā daļa no tām pārklāj visas darbību jomas, kas saistītas ar narkotikām.

- Ir augusi dalībvalstu apziņa, ka ir vajadzīga starpdisciplīnu koordinācija narkotiku apkarošanas jomā. Visas dalībvalstis atzīst, ka tas ir svarīgs narkotiku politikas elements, pat ja nav vienota termina "koordinācija" definīcija.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība nacionālā līmenī

- Nacionālā koordinācija narkotiku kontrolei ir jāpaplašina uz visām narkotiku politikas jomām, ieskaitot regulāras konsultācijas ar pilsonisko sabiedrību.

- Koordinācija nacionālā līmenī (t.i., starp valsts veselības, tiesību un iekšlietu institūcijām, ārējo attiecību iestādēm un budžeta lēmējinstitūcijām) būtu noderīga delegācijām, lai skaidri formulētu to nostāju Padomē.

Sasniegumi ES līmenī

- Kopš ir pieņemts rīcības plāns galveno nacionālo narkotiku kontroles koordinatoru sapulces ir notikušas divreiz gadā.

- Komisija iesniedza paziņojumu par narkotiku koordināciju 2003. gadā. Ir apspriests dokuments, kurā pausti horizontālās grupas narkotiku jautājumos viedokļi par paziņojumu.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība ES līmenī.

- Ir jānodrošina adekvāti uzraudzības pasākumi Komisijas paziņojumam par narkotiku politikas koordināciju. Nacionālo koordinatoru sapulces būtu jākoncentrē vairāk uz specifiskajiem jautājumiem.

- Komisijai būtu jāstiprina un jāracionalizē tās iekšējās koordinācijas mehānismi: tiek prasīta redzamāka un operatīva visu pakalpojumu koordinācija, kas ietverti narkotiku dokumentācijā. Jāsaglabā strukturālā saikne ar EMCDDA.

- Nav skaidra atbildību sadalījums starp Padomē strādājošām grupām, kas risina narkotiku jautājumus. Horizontālai grupai narkotiku jautājumos jābūt vispārēji atbildīgai, koordinējot dažādu narkotiku jautājumu risinošu grupu darbu.

- Formulējot ES narkotiku politiku, nav notikušas regulāras konsultācijas ar pilsonisko sabiedrību; šādām konsultācijām jānotiek pastāvīgi. Tas ir jautājums, kas tiks izskatīts Komisijas paziņojumā 2005. gadā.

3.2. Informācija un novērtējums

Sasniegumi nacionālā līmenī

- Datu par narkotiku situāciju pieejamība un kvalitāte ir uzlabojusies vairums dalībvalstu tāpat kā politiskais atbalsts, kas nepieciešams specifiskas informācijas un novērtējuma darbībām.

- Visas dalībvalstis ir piekritušas piemērot piecus pamata epidemioloģiskos indikatorus[13] un sniegt salīdzinošus un konsolidētus datus.

- Dažas dalībvalstis ir progresējušas mehānismu izstrādē, lai narkotiku jomā varētu regulāri novērtēt efektivitāti.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība nacionālā līmenī

- Jāuzlabo sistemātiska nacionālo narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģiju/rīcības plānu īstenošanas uzraudzība. Ir vajadzīga attīstība, lai nodrošinātu regulāru šādas stratēģijas/rīcības plāna īstenošanas novērtējumu.

- Dalībvalstīm jāiegulda centieni, lai epidemioloģiskie indikatori būtu pilnībā īstenoti.

- Ir jāuzlabo informācijas sniegšana par publiskajiem izdevumiem narkotiku jomā un politiku izmaksu lietderības koeficienta analīze.

Sasniegumi ES līmenī

- Datu un informācijas pieejamība un kvalitāte par situāciju narkotiku jomā ir uzlabojusies, galvenokārt pateicoties EMCDDA darbam un valstu koordinācijas centriem.

- Nobeiguma novērtējuma rezultātā ir izstrādāti pamata metodoloģiskie mehānismi un izveidotas vadības grupas, kas būtu nākotnes ES narkotiku politiku novērtējuma satvars.

- Ir uzlabojusies informācijas apmaiņa par jaunajām tendencēm narkotiku lietošanā, daļēji pateicoties agrā brīdinājuma sistēmas izveidei Vienotās rīcības par sintētiskajām narkotikām[14] ietvaros.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība ES līmenī

- Nav pietiekošas informācijas par noziegumiem, kas saistīti ar narkotikām, un ir jāveic nopietns darbs piemērotu indikatoru izvēlē, ņemot vērā EMCDDA un Eiropola darbu šai jomā.

- Jāuzlabo mehānismi, kas uzrauga radušās tendences narkotiku lietošanā. Tālāk jāizstrādā šādu tendenču izpēte.

3.3. Pieprasījuma samazināšana

Sasniegumi nacionālā līmenī

- Apziņa, ka preventīvas darbības ir jāveic jau agrīnā stadijā, ir visām dalībvalstīm. Tās ir izveidojušas globālas preventīvās programmas, kurās ir iesaistīti eksperti un pilsoniskā sabiedrība.

- Aizvien vairāk tiek īstenoti īpašie preventīvie projekti, kuru mērķis ir novērst dažādu narkotiku kombinēto lietošanu un ļaunprātīgu atļauto vai neatļauto vielu lietošanu. Informācijas kampaņas aizvien vairāk tiek koncentrētas uz mērķa grupām un ir adresētas riska uzvedībām un atkarībām kopumā.

- Vairums dalībvalstu ir palielinājušas finansējumu un ārstēšanas pakalpojumu pieejamību un dažādojušas ārstēšanās iespēju spektru.

- Visās dalībvalstīs vairāk uzmanības pievērš likumpārkāpējiem, kuri lieto narkotikas, ko atspoguļo tas, ka Kopienas līmenī ir vairāk alternatīvu ieslodzījumam un cietumos ir iespējama labāka psihosociālā un veselības aprūpe.

- Visas dalībvalstis ir sākušas seku izpēti, kādas rodas braucot neatļauto narkotiku un medikamentu reibumā, un dažas no tām ir noteikušas stingrākus kontroles pasākumus.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība nacionālā līmenī

- Regulāri jānovērtē ārstēšanas pasākumi, kas paredzēti, lai samazinātu ļaunumu veselībai, ko rada atkarība no narkotikām, un šādu pasākumu efektivitāte.

- Dalībvalstīm būtu jāizveido atzītas kvalifikācijas profesionāļiem, lai novērstu narkotiku lietošanu un samazinātu kaitējumu, ko veselībai rada atkarība no narkotikām.

Sasniegumi ES līmenī

- Padome pieņēmu vairākas rezolūcijas par narkotiku lietošanas novēršanas jautājumiem (skatīt 3. pielikumu).

- Kopienas rīcības programma, lai novērstu atkarību no narkotikām (1996-2002)[15] un Jaunā veselības aizsardzības programma (2003-2008)[16] nodrošina ar līdzfinansēšanu narkotiku lietošanas novēršanas projektiem; Jautājums par ārstēšanu kļūst arvien aktuālāks.

- Padomes Ieteikums par to, kā novērst un mazināt kaitējumu, ko veselībai nodara atkarība no narkotikām, tika pieņemts 2003. gadā[17].

- Ir pieņemta Eiropas Kopienas ceļu satiksmes drošības rīcības programma[18] un Padomes Rezolūcija par cīņu pret psihoaktīvo vielu lietošanas ietekmi ceļa satiksmes negadījumos[19]. Abos dokumentos ir ņemta vērā alkohola, narkotiku un medikamentu iedarbību uz transporta līdzekļa vadīšanu.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība ES līmenī

- ES jāveicina turpmāka biomedicīnas, psihosociālo un citu faktoru izpēte, kas ir narkotiku lietošanas un atkarības pamatā, īpaši tādas jomās, kur šāda izpēte vēl joprojām ir ierobežota (t.i., ilgtermiņa Indijas kaņepju vai sintētisko narkotiku lietošana).

- Jāuzlabo uzticamas un augstas kvalitātes informācijas izplatīšana un jāuzlabo paraugprakse.

- Komisija turpmāk uzraudzīs pamatpunktus no iepriekš minētā Padomes 2003. gada ieteikuma.

3.4. Piegādes samazināšana

Sasniegumi nacionālā līmenī

- Lielākajā daļā dalībvalstu sadarbība starp tiesībaizsardzības iestādēm ir uzlabojusies, izveidojot/pastiprinot tādas struktūras un darbības, piemēram, vienotas policijas/muitas grupas, vienotas kriminālvajāšanas operācijas un saprašanās memorandi.

- Vairākas dalībvalstis šķiet spēj darboties saskaņā ar 17. panta noteikumiem (nelikumīga tirdzniecība, izmantojot jūras satiksmi) 1988. gada ANO Konvencijā par narkotisku un psihotropisko vielu nelikumīgu tirdzniecību.

- Visas dalībvalstis ir transponējušas savā nacionālajā likumdošanā pirmo direktīvu par nelikumīgi iegūtas naudas legalizēšanu[20] un 11 dalībvalstis ir transponējušas direktīvu, ar kuru ir grozīta pirmā direktīva.[21]. Papildus, lai samazinātu nelikumīgi iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanu, dalībvalstis ir ieviesušas jaunus pasākumus, piemēram, tiesības nepieļaut darījumus un lielākas tiesības kontrolēt ceļotājus, kuri ieved lielas naudas summas.

- 10 dalībvalstis ir transponējušas Padomes pamatlēmuma noteikumus par vienotām izmeklētāju grupām[22] un/vai ir ratificējušas ES Konvenciju par savstarpējo juridisko palīdzību krimināllietās[23] vai ir norādījušas, ka patreizējie tiesību akti jau pieļauj šādu grupu veidošanu.

- 10 dalībvalstis ir ratificējušas Konvenciju par savstarpējo palīdzību un sadarbību starp muitas pārvaldēm (Neapole II)[24]. 14 dalībvalstis ir ratificējušas Konvenciju par informāciju tehnoloģiju lietošanu muitas mērķiem (CIS)[25].

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība nacionālā līmenī

- Tām dalībvalstīm, kurās nepastāv formālas struktūras, lai varētu tikt veikta sadarbība starp to nacionālajām tiesībaizsardzības iestādēm, vajadzības gadījumā jāapsver šādu formālu struktūru izveidošana.

- Dalībvalstīm jānodrošina, ka tajās pastāv nepieciešamās procedūras, lai nodrošinātu, ka tās darbojas saskaņā ar 1988. gada ANO Konvencijas 17. panta noteikumiem un jāapsver metodiska līdzekļa izstrāde attiecība uz to īstenošanu.

- Dalībvalstīm, kuras to nav paveikušas, jātransponē otrā direktīva par nelikumīgi iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanu[26], Padomes pamatlēmums par kopīgām izmeklēšanas grupām un/vai jāratificē ES Konvencija par savstarpējo juridisko palīdzību krimināllietās un jāratificē Neapoles II Konvencija un CIS Konvencija.

Sasniegumi ES līmenī

- Sadarbība starp tiesībaizsardzības iestādēm ES līmenī ir uzlabojusies, izveidojot/pastiprinot struktūras, pilnveidojot Eiropola un Eirojust darbības un darbībām, piemēram, kopējās izmeklēšanas, apvienotas muitas operācijas, jūras sadarbība, kopīgas komandas un policijas un muitu sadarbības centri.

- Vairāki ES projekti (piemēram, CASE, EELS un EILCS, ), kuru mērķis ir identificēt sintētisko narkotiku ražošanu un tirdzniecību, ir izveidoti un jau darbojas.

- Kopš 2000. gada 5 vielas ir nokļuvušas par ES plašu kontroles pasākumu redzeslokā, pamatojoties uz vienoto rīcību sintētisko narkotiku jomā.

- ES finansēšanas programmas tādas kā AGIS[27] ir bijušas nozīmīgas, lai atvieglotu sadarbību starp dalībvalstu tiesībaizsardzības iestādēm.

- Ir sasniegta politiskā vienošanās par Padomes pamatlēmumu, ar kuru paredz minimālos noteikumus par noziedzīgu darbību elementiem un sodiem par nelikumīgu narkotiku tirdzniecību[28]. Tās formālā pieņemšana drīzumā ir gaidāma.

- Ir pieņemta Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regula par narkotisko vielu prekursoriem (Kopienas iekšējā tirdzniecība)[29]. Priekšlikumu Padomes regulai par ārējo narkotisko vielu prekursoru tirdzniecību[30] ir iesniegusi Komisija.

- OLAF ir atvieglojis svarīgu informācijas apmaiņas procesu, kas saistīts ar prekursoru radīto novirzīšanas risku, un turpina atbalstīt Jahtu un jūras informācijas sistēmas.

- tiek apspriesta turpmāka Pastāvīgās sadarbības koordinācijas vienības attīstība, lai atbalstītu Apvienotās muitas operācijas.

- Komisija ir pieņēmusi priekšlikumu trešajai direktīvai par nelikumīgi iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanu[31].

- Padomes Lēmuma[32] par informācijas apmaiņu starp Finansiālajām izlūkošanas vienībām (FIV) pieņemšana ir nodrošinājusi labāku sadarbības satvaru.

- Vairākas dalībvalstis ir iesaistījušās diskusijā par jaunu apvienoto grupu formēšanu un papildus tālejošas varas piešķiršanu policijai un tiesu varas institūcijām, lai tās varētu darboties viena otras teritorijās.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība ES līmenī.

- Dalībvalstīm jāizveido apvienotās izmeklēšanas grupas, lai cīnītos ar narkotiku tirdzniecību starp tām, kā tas noteikts Padomes Pamatlēmumā un Konvencijā.

- Jāapspriež tālākas izstrādātas apvienotās operācijas starp dalībvalstu izpildvaras institūcijām. Par šo operāciju izveidi un rezultātiem jāziņo Padomei un Komisijai.

- Jāizvērš turpmāko operāciju izstrāde, kas apkarotu sintētisko narkotiku ražošanu un tirdzniecību. Ierosinājumi kartografēšanas izplatīšanas tīkla izveidošanai, kurus iesniedza Komisija, varētu būt kā noderīgs sākumpunkts šajā procesā.

- Pilnībā jāievieš Padomes ieteikums uzlabot tiesībaizsardzības iestāžu statistikas savstarpēju pielīdzināšanu attiecībā uz narkotiskajām vielām un dažādiem narkotisko vielu prekursoriem[33].

- Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei iespējami drīzāk jāpieņem trešā direktīva par nelikumīgi iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanu.

3.5. Paplašināšanās

Lai gan paplašināšanās notika vairāk nekā astoņus mēnešus pirms perioda beigām, kuru pārklāj Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģija, narkotiku iniciatīvas veido daļu no ES acquis. Visas jaunās dalībvalstis un divas kandidātvalstis brīvprātīgi ir sniegušas atbildes uz Komisijas aptaujas lapas jautājumiem[34]. Šo datu kopsavilkums tiks iekļauts atsevišķā ziņojumā.

Sasniegumi

- PHARE programma un citas saistītās Kopienas programmas ir bijušas īpaši noderīgas, lai iepazīstinātu jaunās dalībvalstis un kandidātvalstis ar acquis elementiem attiecībā uz narkotiku apkarošanu.

- Gandrīz visas dalībvalstis ir sniegušas palīdzību jaunajām dalībvalstīm to centienos izskaust narkomāniju un apkarot narkotiku tirdzniecību. Dalībvalstis ir sniegušas līdzīgu palīdzību arī kandidātvalstīm.

- Visas jaunās dalībvalstis ir transponējušas acquis elementus attiecībā uz narkotiku apkarošanu savā nacionālajā likumdošanā un kandidātvalstis atrodas šai procesā.

- Acquis TI nodaļa ir uz laiku slēgta Bulgārijai un sarunas ar Rumāniju atrodas progresa stadijā.

- Vienošanās ar Bulgāriju, Rumāniju un Turciju par līdzdalību EMCDDA darbā ir aizsākta.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība

- Būtu jāpastāv ciešai sadarbībai starp dalībvalstīm un kandidātvalstīm attiecībā uz to acquis elementu īstenošanu, kas skar narkotiku apkarošanu.

- Jaunajām dalībvalstīm būtu pilnībā jāizmanto AGIS un citas saistītās programmas, lai tiktu atvieglota sadarbība ar citām dalībvalstīm

- Vienošanās ar trim kandidātvalstīm, kas veicina to līdzdalību EMCDDA darbā, jāstājas spēkā iespējami drīz.

- PHARE programmai arī turpmāk jāsniedz palīdzība kandidātvalstīm narkotiku apkarošanas jomā.

3.6. Starptautiskā sadarbība

Sasniegumi nacionālā līmenī

- Dalībvalstis sniedz palīdzību, kas saistīta ar narkotiskajām vielām, trešām valstīm uz divpusēja pamata un/vai ar Apvienoto Nāciju Organizācijas Biroja narkotiku un noziedzības apkarošanai (UNODC) starpniecību.

- Vairākas dalībvalstis sadarbojās ar trešām valstīm, lai izveidotu un uzlabotu sistēmas, kas darbojas pret nelikumīgi iegūto līdzekļu legalizēšanu.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība nacionālajā līmenī.

- Visām dalībvalstī sistemātiski jāievada datubāzē dati, kuru izveidojusi Komisija par tehniskās palīdzības projektiem kandidātvalstīm un trešām valstīm narkotiku apkarošanas jomā.

- Dalībvalstīm regulāri jāinformē Padome un Komisija par to divpusējām darbībām trešās valstīs un reģionos.

Sasniegumi ES līmenī

- Komisija koncentrē savus centienus uz diviem galvenajiem kontrabandas ceļiem uz ES.

- Komisija regulāri informē Padomi par palīdzību, kas saistīta ar narkotiskajām vielām, trešām valstīm/reģioniem un par uzlabotu integrēto procesu, kā ietvaros tiek finansēti narkotiku apkarošanas projekti trešās valstīs/reģionos.

- Eiropas kaimiņattiecību politikas kontekstā ar vairākām valstīm tiek apspriesti rīcības plāni. Plānos parasti ir iekļauta iedaļa, kurā risināti narkotiku jautājumi.

- Visas saistītās Kopienas un ES ārējās vienošanās paredz speciālus noteikumus attiecībā uz narkotiskajām vielām.

Jomas, kurās ir vajadzīga tālāka attīstība ES līmenī

- Dalībvalstīm un Komisijai turpmāk jānodrošina saskaņota ES nostāja starptautiskajos forumos, kuros risina narkotiku jautājumu, jo īpaši ANO Komisijā par narkotiskajām vielām.

- Dalībvalstīm un Komisijai jāturpina saistīta palīdzība attiecība uz narkotiskajām vielām, ko tās sniedz Centrālāzijai, Latīņamerikai un Karību reģionam un Rietumbalkānu valstīm, ar rīcības plāniem narkotiku jomā, kas pieņemti šajos reģionos. Šajā sakarā varētu apspriest piemērotus finansēšanas mehānismus.

- Ir jānodrošina saikne starp jaunu ES rīcības plānu narkotiku jomā pieņemšanu dažādiem pasaules reģioniem un resursu piešķiršanu, lai tos īstenotu.

- Dalībvalstu narkotiku ekspertiem jāturpina aktīvi piedalīties, uzsverot narkotiku jautājuma nozīmību, kad tiek veidoti/pārskatīti valstu/reģionālie programmēšanas dokumenti. Jāveido labāka koordinācija starp Teritoriāli strādājošām pusēm un horizontālo grupu narkotiku jautājumos.

- Jāpārrauga un jāņem vērā jauni neparedzēti gadījumi un tendences narkotiku lietošanā un ražošanā specifiskās valstīs/reģionos.

- Pilnībā jāizmanto pastāvošie mehānismi, tādi kā Dublinas grupa, lai īstenotu starptautiskās komunikācijas narkotiku jomā.

4. SECINāJUMI

I Rīcības plānā noteikto darbību sasniegumu līmeņa novērtējums

- Apmēram 95% no ES rīcības plānā narkotisku jomā izklāstītajām darbībām ir īstenotas vai atrodas to īstenošanas stadijā.

- ES Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģija un rīcības plāns tiek uzskatīts par centrālo atskaites punktu darbībai un ir nodrošinājis ar pamatu darbībām, kas saistītas ar narkotiskajām vielām un iniciatīvām nacionālā un ES līmenī.

- Gandrīz visas dalībvalstis ir pieņēmušas nacionālo narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģiju vai rīcības plānu. Starp elementiem šajās nacionālajās narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijās un rīcības plānos pastāv kopēji modeļi ar ES pieeju, kāda iezīmēta ES Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijā un rīcības plānā.

II Pakāpes novērtējums, kādā mērā rīcības plāna sasniegumi atbilst narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas mērķiem

- Teju nav šaubu, ka rīcības plānā norādīto darbību īstenošana lielākā vai mazākā mērā ir veicinājusi 11 ES Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas mērķu īstenošanas sasniegumus.

III Narkotiku situācijas ietekmes novērtējums.

- Zināmā mērā ir vērojams progress dažu ES narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas mērķu sasniegšanā (2. mērķis un jo īpaši 3. mērķis[35]).

- Pamatojoties uz novērtējuma instrumentiem, nav pieejami neapgāžami pierādījumi, kas apstiprinātu argumentu, ka 1. mērķis - ievērojami samazināt narkotiku lietošanas izplatību- ir sasniegts vai, ka mazāks jaunu cilvēku skaits lieto narkotikas. Tomēr aktuāla informācija liecina, ka var saskatīt vispārējās narkotiku lietošanas izplatības attīstības izlīdzināšanos, lai gan izplatība jau ir sasniegusi vēsturiski augstu līmeni.

- Līdzīgi, pieejamā informācija neliecina, ka narkotiku pieejamība ir būtiski samazināta (4. mērķis). Vienlaikus, 4. un 5. mērķis kopumā ir bijis kā katalizatori vairākām ES līmeņa iniciatīvām, kas ir stiprinājušas tiesībaizsardzības pasākumus pret narkotiku tirdzniecību un piegādi.

- Ir uzsāktas vairākas svarīgas iniciatīvas, lai cīnītos pret nelikumīgi iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanu (6.1. mērķis). Atsaucoties uz 6.2. mērķi, dalībvalstis piedalās vairākās svarīgās iniciatīvās cīņai ar prekursoru novirzīšanu, piemēram, Eiropas Apvienotās prekursoru apkarošanas vienībā. Ir iesniegti svarīgi priekšlikumi.

5. PRIEKŠLIKUMI

- ES NāKOTNES narkotiku stratēģijā jānorāda skaidri un precīzi mērķi un prioritātes, kas var tikt pārvērsti operatīvos indikatoros un darbībās turpmākajos rīcību plānos, ar skaidri definētu atbildību un īstenošanas termiņiem. Ir jāņem vērā informācijas sistēmas un novērtējuma mehānismi, kad nosaka mērķus un prioritātes.

- Ir jāturpina attīstība gan informācijas pieejamībā, kvalitātē gan salīdzināmībā, kad tiek uzraudzīta narkotiku situācija.

- Komisija 2005. gada sākumā iesniegs priekšlikumu rīcības plānam narkotiku jomā 2005.-2008. gadam. Papildus, Komisija sastādīs ikgadējo progresa pārskatu par šī rīcības plāna īstenošana un 2008. gadā organizēs ietekmes novērtējumu, lai piedāvātu otru rīcības plānu laikposmā no 2009. līdz 2012. gadam. Laikposmā no 2009. līdz 2012. gadam Komisija turpinās sastādīt ikgadējos progresa pārskatus. 2012. gadā Komisija organizēs ES Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas un rīcības plāna nobeiguma novērtējumu, kuru iesniegs Padomei un Eiropas Parlamentam.

- Jaunās Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģijas un rīcības plāna mērķi ir jāatspoguļo daudzgadīga programmā, ar kuru konsolidē brīvības, drošības un tiesiskuma reģionu.

- Primārai Padomes horizontālās grupai narkotiku jomā jākoncentrējas uz darbību, kas noteiktas nākotnes ES rīcības plānos narkotisku jomā, virzīšanu uz priekšu un īstenošanas uzraudzību, kā arī jāpilda vadošā loma, koordinējot citu Padomes grupu darbu narkotisku jomā.

- Pašreiz tiek īstenotas vairākas interesantas un noderīgas darbības narkotiku jomā. Būtu plašāk jādalās ar šo darbību rezultātiem, lai veicinātu līdzīgs aktivitātes citur. Šajā kontekstā, ir jāpārdomā ikgadēja semināra organizēšana par narkotiku politikas aspektiem, kas savienoti ar šīm aktivitātēm.

- Nobeiguma novērtējums būtu jāņem vērā, veidojot jauno ES Narkotiku apkarošanas stratēģija no 2005. līdz 2012. gadam.

ANNEX 1

Summary of 15 Member States responses to the questionnaire on the implementation of the EU Action Plan on Drugs (2000-2004)

1. Co-ordination

1.2.2 What steps has your country taken towards the establishment or the strengthening of the national co-ordination mechanisms since 1999? Has your country appointed a National Drugs Co-ordinator in the related period? Does your country envisage carrying out or has your country carried out an evaluation of the co-ordination mechanisms?

All Member States recognise the importance of coordinating the activities of the multiple actors involved in the drugs issue. They report to have mechanisms in place for coordinating their national drugs policies. Member States have adopted different models of coordination, depending on their national administrative structures and on the aspects of the fight against drugs they intend to focus on; some have interdepartmental committees, some have appointed national drug coordinators (e.g. France, Germany, Luxembourg, Portugal, Italy, Spain and Sweden) and/or established dedicated coordination units or bodies (e.g. Austria, Greece, Ireland, Finland). Some, however, lack coordination mechanisms that cover all aspects. Few Member States provide for evaluation of their coordination mechanisms.

1.2.4 In what way has your country ensured a balanced and multidisciplinary approach in national drugs programmes and policies and their implementation?

The importance of maintaining a multidisciplinary and balanced approach is clearly recognised by all Member States. Most have adopted a national plan or strategy on drugs (Belgium Denmark, Greece, Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain and the UK).

1.3.2 Has your country developed a specific strategy for co-operation with civil society regarding drug abuse? Please give details.

Most Member States make provisions for involving civil society in the fields of prevention, health care and treatment, mainly at local level. Most of them also consult civil society on an ad hoc basis, e.g. for specific projects. Many Member States mention financial support for community groups and organisations as a way of cooperating with civil society.

Some countries (Germany, Greece, Ireland, and Sweden) have more regular contacts with the networks of NGOs, the voluntary sector, associations, etc. These countries recognise the importance of linking policy making and practice through dialogue with civil society, but also refer to the supporting work done by these organisations to influence public opinion.

1.4.2. In which way has your country encouraged the provision of funding for the prevention of drug use, the prevention of drug related crime, the reduction of the negative health and social consequences of drugs and other proactive measures?

Public expenditure on prevention and risk reduction programmes and measures are different from one country to another depending on the national administrative structure, ministerial budgets and social security systems. Some Member States (Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, and United Kingdom) indicate an increase of funding for drug-demand reduction.

1.5 In which way has your country shared information with other Member States on national strategies and action plans? Has your country made use of the EMCDDA database on drug laws, the Falcone and OISIN programmes or any other tools for information exchange and operational co-operation? Please describe.

Member States consider other national measures, strategies and action plans as useful examples for orienting their own national debate. Very often information exchange is made via bilateral contacts and visits. The Horizontal Drugs Group and the meetings of the national coordinators are recognised as important occasions to share information and views.

All Member States acknowledge the importance of learning from the others and quote internet as an important source of information. Most of them report regular input and consultation of the EMCDDA databases (EDDRA, ELDD).

As far as law enforcement information sharing is concerned, most Member States mention the Europol national liaison officers. All Member States were able to take part in joint projects co-financed by the Commission's OISIN and/or the Falcone programmes. Since 2003 XXX (can we give a figure??) have received funding under the new AGIS programme[36].

2. Information and Evaluation

2.1.1 and 2.1.4 Does your country fully or partly provide information on the 5 key epidemiological indicators of the EMCDDA? If your country does not fully provide information on the 5 key epidemiological indicators when do you believe you will be in a position to do so? Please give brief description of the evolution of political and financial support to implement the 5 harmonised key indicators.

All Member States have established systems for the gathering and treatment of data which will provide comparable and reliable data on the 5 key epidemiologic indicators, and most Member States are able to provide (partial) information on all indicators. In order to improve the data quality of the used sources and to alleviate the lack of information on some indicators, Member States have introduced the necessary amendments in their legislative systems, organised special workgroups composed of representatives from various Ministries, services, and NGOs specialised in the fight against drugs and actively participated in EMCDDA workshops In most Member States, political and financial support provided by the government for establishing the five indicators (particularly through the national budget to the REITOX Network) is considered sufficient.

2.2.6 and 2.2.7 Which measures are used in your country to assess the effectiveness of preventing and combating organised drug related crime? What kind of crime and policy indicators has your country developed? Has your country drafted an annual assessment on the role of organised crime groups involved in drug trafficking?

No unanimity exists among member States on the methodology used to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive actions and measures to fight organised crime related to drug-trafficking, but all annual reports include statistics which illustrate the number of confiscations and their quantities, the share of dismantled clandestine laboratories, the number of arrests, the number of drug-related deaths and other indicators of repressive actions by the relevant agencies. Member States contribute to the annual EU Organised Crime report, which includes a section on drugs, in accordance with the criteria set out in Enfopol 35 Rev 2 (21.4.1997).

Some Member States undertake further research on the linkage between drug phenomena and criminal activities, e.g. Ireland's public surveys on the nature of the policing, the visibility and perception of crime, including drug related crime.

3. Reduction of Demand, Prevention of Drug Use and of Drug Related Crime

3.1.1.1 Does your country have general programmes for the prevention of both licit and illicit drug use, including poly-drug use? In which way, if any, does your country encourage the inclusion of drug use prevention in school curricula? Are there programmes set-up to assist parents? If yes, please describe briefly.

Member States underline the importance of prevention, and the need for better and accurate information campaigns and prevention programmes focused on the promotion of health as well as on the personal and social development of the young people.

Prevention programmes can involve, among many other measures, the creation of prevention centres, specific training for experts and civil society (teachers, parents, support organisations...), health professionals and even representatives of the law enforcement services, working in the school environment and among young people. The importance of regular cooperation with young people's associations, sports clubs, as well as taking preventive actions in nightclubs and major music and dance events are also stressed, in a way to promote healthy initiatives. Frequently decentralised, organised at local level in collaboration with the local autorities and the civil society, whit a short duration, they address to youngsters and other target groups.

Specific prevention projects aimed at tackling the poly-drug use and the abuse of licit substances (alcohol, tobacco, doping substances and medicinal products) are more and more implemented in all Member States.

Member States agree on the effectiveness of school based drug education programme, but only a few countries (France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Spain, and UK) have clear references to illicit substances and their effects inscribed on the schools curriculum.

3.1.1.3 Could you describe the way your country allocated resources for positive alternatives to drugs for youngsters, in particular in socially deprived urban areas?

Member States have many projects on positive alternatives to drug use specifically targeted on older children and adolescents in disadvantaged urban areas, namely through the creation of youth consultation centres that provide recreational, sports and educational activities with job counselling.

The budget allocated to these prevention projects came from different sources: health, youth or social services, youth organisations as well as local projects supported by local authorities. Sweden gives precise details on amounts allocated.

3.1.1.4 Could you mention and describe briefly a particularly innovative approach to the prevention of the abuse of synthetic drugs developed in your country?

Member States are stressing their concern for the increasing popularity of synthetic drugs in the European Union and underline the importance of school-based programmes and information campaigns aimed at young people, but also on the internet, in all media, as well as dance clubs and music festivals. The distribution of informative material, the implementation of risk reduction measures at parties, pill testing and cooperation with owners of night clubs, medical staff and police are also mentioned.

3.1.2.1, 3.1.2.6, 3.1.2.7 Has your country developed outreach work and/or easy accessible services for drug users? Which steps were taken to increase access and availability of services designed to reach drug abusers who were not integrated or covered by mainstream services? Please describe these briefly. Which were the strategies for vaccinating drug users against hepatitis A and B?

Several Member States have adopted integrated policies for risk reduction which propose low-threshold services, such as programmes for syringe exchange, condom distribution, access to substitution treatments and drug consumption rooms. Certain high risk groups such as addicted pregnant women, homeless people, prostitutes and prison inmates can benefit from specific programmes. Vaccination against Hepatitis B, prevention and treatment of contagious diseases linked to intravenous drug abuse has been recognised as priorities by all Member States.

3.1.2.2, 3.1.2.3, 3.3.1 Please report briefly on any awareness raising campaigns carried out on the dangers related to drug use as well as on major programmes on the reduction of risks and consequences related to use. Do the actions target all age groups, in particular children and young people? In what sense have these campaigns been innovative and have made use of new means of communication such as, for example, the Internet?

All Member states underline the importance of information/awareness campaigns on drug related risks and organise regular campaigns in the media for the general public, as well as specific ones directed at target groups. Campaigns aimed at specific substances (cannabis, cocaine, ecstasy...) are also mentioned. The spread of hotlines on drugs and the use of internet in the field of demand reduction seem to be increasing in all countries.

Sweden gives a number of examples of messages aimed at young at young people in different campaign contexts. Finland mentionnes a specific emphasis in the use of internet in drug demand reduction.

3.1.2.4 In which way does your country ensure that enough attention is paid to drug related issues in training and education of doctors, social workers and other professionals in the health and social sector? Are they included in the curricula of the education of these professionals?

Training of teachers, social workers, health professionals, and law enforcement representatives is a priority in all Member States and budgets have been allocated for this purpose. In several countries (Ireland, France, Germany, Portugal), specialisations in addiction, alcoholism, , and new substitution treatments are organised within the context of university courses.

3.1.2.5 Has any research been carried out in your country about the effects of driving under the influence of illicit drugs and pharmaceuticals? If yes, could you please summarize the results which could be relevant for policy decisions?

Several Member States (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, The Netherlands, Finland and UK) announced having undertaken research on driving under the influence of illegal substances, or in association with alcohol and/or medicines. In many cases legislation was reviewed and controls and sanctions reinforced. On the other hand, even though testing for alcohol is compulsory, testing drivers involved in accidents for narcotics is not yet systematic.

3.1.3.1 Which are the types of treatment services for drugs users, and measures to assist severely dependent individuals, including measures to reduce the health related damages provided in your country? Please describe briefly

In accordance with their national situation and legislation, Member States have diversified drug care systems, which can include day-care centres, detoxification units, therapeutic communities, substitution centres, aftercare programmes and special units in prisons. Frequently carried out at local level and in collaboration with NGO's, they are directed towards different age groups, gender specific needs and drug dependent people in different stages of dependence.

Some Member States have also underlined the existence of drug consumption rooms and programmes of medical heroin delivery (Belgium, Germany).

3.1.3.2 Which are the average waiting periods for accessing treatment in your country?

Member States indicate that, after investments in treatment services mainly at local level, there are no waiting periods for accessing treatment other than for residential treatment and substitution treatment.

3.1.3.3 Has your country defined guidelines for the standards and goals of treatment services, and ensured the evidence-based evaluation of these treatments? If yes, please briefly describe the outcome. Does your country have a national protocol on treatment assessment?

The majority of Member States has not developed models for the systematic and global evaluation of drug treatment. However, scientific research on the effectiveness of the proposed measures is undertaken using the monitoring of drug-addicts under treatment (among other indicators).

3.1.3.4 In which way does your country ensure that adequate attention is paid to the social and professional integration of former addicts? Please describe briefly the most relevant measures adopted in this area, including any projects implemented under the Community Programmes between 1999 and 2003

The professional and social integration of drug addicts, considered very important by all Member States, is promoted in co-operation with NGO's, local authorities and the business community, to provide for educational programmes, vocational training and special employment opportunities for ex-addicts. The Netherlands and UK underline the programmes aimed at tackling this issue within the criminal justice system and the measures to prepare the drug misusing offender reintegration into the labour market.

3.2.2 Have the resources for research into the biomedical and social causes of addiction, prevention and behavioural patterns of drug consumption been modified during the reference period?

Several Member States indicate that they do not have exact figures for functions allocated to drug research, by the government departments, universities, NGOs, and research institutes. Nevertheless, they stress the importance of studies on epidemiology, public health and social sciences in achieving a better definition of public policies.

3.2.3 Has your country identified new areas where it is considered useful to implement actions at the European level to contribute to reduce drug-related harm?

New consumption trends, international and trans-border cooperation are areas generally identified as deserving greater attention within the EU.

3.3.2 How has your country addressed risk behaviour and addiction in general, including aspects of alcohol, medicine, substances used for doping in sport and tobacco use?

Member States' strategies and policies are increasingly geared towards addictions in general, linking licit and illicit drugs, with special measures concerning alcohol, tobacco, doping substances and abuse of medicinal products. Belgium also takes into account gambling and food dependency.

3.4.1.1 What programmes have been set-up in your country to promote best practices in the prevention of criminal activities linked with drugs, juvenile and urban delinquency?

The prevention of drug related crime, juvenile and urban delinquency is a priority for Member States which have allocated funds for programmes based on in-service training of police and other prevention agents, information campaigns on drugs and measures for the development of a healthy lifestyle through sports, leisure and educational activities, acquisition of specific skills, implementation of peer groups, counselling/follow up, cultural activities, and treatment/counselling activities.

In the Netherlands, the project "Communities that care", which involves civil society, aims to create a safe and liveable environment for young people.

3.4.2 and 3.4.3 Could you describe the mechanisms in place to provide alternatives to Prison (in particular for young offenders). Which measures have been foreseen to provide drug prevention and treatment services and, where appropriate, measures to reduce health damages in prisons and upon release from prison?

In several Member States(Portugal, Denmark...), depending the penal system and on the basis of the voluntary acceptance of treatment, a large spectrum of alternative measures is proposed to drug addicts in order to avoid incarceration: financial penalties and administrative sanctions, community work, vocational training and follow-up, etc.

In view of the high level of drug consumption in prisons, some countries have introduced risk reduction measures, such as vaccination programmes, needles exchange, drug free rooms, substitution treatments by methadone, etc.

3.4.4 Please mention the main examples of sharing with other Member States best practices on the handling of drugs addicts in the justice system. In what way were the results of the study prepared by the EMCDDA in this field considered by your country

Some Member States refer to sharing best practices in the treatment of drug addicts in the justice system through active participation in the European Union Crime Prevention Network (EUCPN) and the European Network Drugs Services in Prison (ENDSP), as well as cooperation with other Member States within the EMCDDA and the Pompidou Group.

The study of the EMCDDA is referred to by only few countries.

3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.3 In view of the need to develop expertise in the prevention of drug use, has your country promoted the creation of co-ordinated qualification skills in this area? What has been done in order to encourage the development and implementation of a network of trainers and other professionals in the health and social sector? How have the best practices been promoted and brought to the attention of other Member States and the Commission?

Training of prevention agents is deemed paramount in all Member States, although efforts must still be made to create formal qualifications.

In the context of health promotion strategies, expert networks and specialised training centres have been established to ensure permanent training of the various prevention agents.

Several Member States underline the role of the EDDRA and EMCDDA networks, of the Pompidou Group and of the HDG in the exchange of information on prevention.

4. Supply Reduction

4.1.1.1 Please indicate which measures your country has applied to ensure a high and uniform level of security at the external borders of the EU in relation to drugs.

Within Member States the law enforcement services involved in combating drug trafficking are involved in close co-operation. This co-operation can take the form of joint groups of risk analysis, a network of "contact points" between the relevant services, special teams of police and customs officers, a "coastal-watch" programme involving police, customs and the maritime rescue service, memoranda of understanding and operational protocols between the relevant services.

In order to ensure a high level of security at the EU's external borders, Member State law enforcement services use a range of equipment such as drug detection scanners, patrol vessels, and drug detector dogs. Member States also refer to the training provided to law enforcement personnel in combating drug trafficking.

Co-operation also takes place between the law enforcement services of different Member States. For example, there are police/customs co-operation centres, joint customs operations, and participation in training courses by one Member State in those hosted by another Member State. The Convention on mutual assistance and co-operation between customs administrations (Naples II) is also seen to have potential as a tool for cross-border co-operation.

4.1.1.3 Has your country, taking into account the existing EU systems for exchange of information and working with other Member States in the relevant Council bodies, reinforced its efforts against maritime drug trafficking? Has your country organised training courses on the identification and surveillance of suspicious vessels, and have you established procedures for boarding and searching vessels? Has your country implemented the principles laid down in Article 17 of the UN Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances? If so, please describe briefly how this has been done.

A number of Member States have indicated that they are in a position to operate in accordance with the provisions of Article 17 of the 1988 UN Convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances or have incorporated Article 17 or parts of Article 17 into national law (Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and the Netherlands).

Member States refer to a number of techniques used for combating maritime drug trafficking such as risk profiling, ship surveillance and vessel search techniques. Use is made of the maritime information systems such as MAR-INFO and YACHTINFO in order to exchange information on suspected drug trafficking and on drug seizures. Maritime co-operation between Member States has led to the capture of ships which were used for drug smuggling and the seizure of illicit drugs.

Some Member States indicate that they have training courses in the field of combating maritime drug trafficking or such training is included as a part of the training provided to the relevant personnel (France, Germany, Ireland, and the Netherlands). One Member State (France) indicates that it has established a guide regarding the implementation of Article 17 of the 1988 UN Convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.

4.1.1.4 Has your country, with the support of Europol, examined the means to combine forensic and law enforcement information in order to identify the production and trafficking of synthetic drugs and those involved in their production and trafficking? What are the results of this analysis?

At national level, Member States combine forensic and law enforcement information in order to identify the production and trafficking of synthetic drugs. In, at least, one Member State (France) a sharing of databases between the relevant law enforcement agencies containing scientific information on synthetic drugs is to be developed.

Many Member States emphasise the importance of the various EU projects aimed at identifying the production and trafficking of synthetic drugs such as CASE, Synthes-lab, EELS, EILCS, and CHEDDAR

4.1.1.5 Has the co-operation between police, customs and judicial authorities been improved in your country in the drugs field? Has your country participated in EU Third Pillar Programmes in the field of co-operation between these authorities? Please give details, in particular of the results and benefits of such programmes for your country.

Member State police and customs services participate in joint enforcement operations and investigations against drug traffickers, joint training courses and have appointed police/custom liaison officers. Some Member States have permanent joint police/customs teams (France, Germany, the Netherlands). Greece refers to its Central Anti-Drug Coordination Body with police and customs representation and the UK refers to its Concerted Inter-Agency Drugs Action Group.

Training courses and seminars aimed at improving police, customs and judicial co-operation at EU level have received funding from the European Commission under various programmes. In the Nordic Member States police and customs collaboration takes place within a specific framework PTN (Police and Customs Co-operation in the Nordic Countries).

4.1.1.6 Has your country implemented the project-based EU law enforcement strategy against transnational organised crime to combat drug trafficking? Please describe briefly.

Techniques used to combat organised crime include surveillance, infiltration and phone-taping. Investigations into the activities of trans-national organised crime groups involved in the distribution of drugs have taken place. These investigations have involved the law enforcement authorities of several Member States. Member States also participate in relevant Europol Analysis Work Files (AWFs) such as Mustard, Cola and Genesis.

4.1.2.2 and 4.1.2.3 What measures has your country taken against money laundering? How does the analysis and exchange of information between your Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and other FIUs work?

All MS have transposed into national law Directive 91/308/CEE of the Council of 10 June 1991 on prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and 11 (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the UK) have transposed Directive 2001/97/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2001 amending Council Directive 91/308/EEC. In addition, Member States have introduced new measures to reduce money laundering such as powers to oppose the execution of a transaction and increased powers for the control of travellers who import large sums of money.

Council Decision of 17 December 2000 relative to the exchange of information between the Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) of the Member States provides a primary framework for the exchange of information between the FIUs of the Member States. 8 Member States utilise the FIU-Net as a means of exchanging information between FIUs. Individual Member States also exchange information with third country FIUs. This exchange of information often takes place under the auspices of signed Memoranda of Understanding which generally are developed in accordance with the principles of the Egmont Group. The Egmont Secure Web is also utilised as a secure communication network.

Some Member States also refer to the 40 Recommendations of the FATF (Financial Action Task Force), the Council Framework Decision on money laundering, identifying, tracing, freezing and confiscation of criminal assets and the proceeds of crime and the Council of Europe Convention on laundering, search, seizure and confiscation of the proceeds of crime.

4.1.2.6 What type of training for customs and police does your country provide in view of combating the diversion of chemical precursors, including possibly the assistance of the Commission and EUROPOL?

Law enforcement officers receive training in combating the diversion of precursors through stand alone courses or through courses related to combating synthetic drugs production and trafficking. Some Member States refer to the assistance provided by Europol in this regard.

4.2.1 Please describe the joint investigative units which have been established in your country between police, customs and other law enforcement agencies specifically responsible for tackling drug trafficking.

Some Member States have permanent joint police/customs teams. Other law enforcement authorities may be represented on these teams. In other Member States joint police/customs investigations take place as the need arises.

4.2.2 Please describe the measures your country has taken, with the assistance of Europol where appropriate, to reinforce co-operation with other Member States against drug trafficking. In particular, please mention if any joint teams with other Member States have been established when dealing with drug trafficking between Member States. If no such teams have been established, please explain why this is the case.

Co-operation between Member States against drug trafficking generally takes place through exchanges of information, joint investigations or law enforcement co-operation in border areas. Some Member States have established a joint police/customs team to combat drug trafficking on road and rail routes between them. 6 Member States (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK) together with Europol are involved in a European Joint Unit to combat serious criminal activity in the field of precursor chemical diversion.

A number of Member States have transposed into national law the provisions of the Council Framework Decision on joint investigation teams and/or have ratified the EU Convention on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters or have indicated that legislation in place already enables the setting up of such teams (Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the UK). However, joint investigation teams, as provided for in the Framework Decision or the Convention, dealing with drug trafficking between Member States have not been established. Some Member States are involved in discussions with regard to forming joint investigation teams and giving their police and judicial authorities additional, more far-reaching powers to operate on each other's territories.

4.2.3 Please describe the measures your country has taken to promote regional co-operation with other Member States affected by similar drug problems.

A number of Member States (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and Spain) have created police and custom co-operation centres on their common borders. Regional systems of exchange of information have been established by, for example, a permanent liaison bureau and the appointment of joint superintendents. Police officers from one Member States participate in police officer meetings of another Member State (Belgium and the Netherlands). In addition, a number of Member States have adopted a co-ordinated regional approach to combating drug tourism (Belgium, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands). The Nordic Member States are part of a regional law enforcement co-operation known as PTN with a significant focus on combating drug-related crime. These Member States and Germany are also part of the Task Force on Organised Crime in the Baltic Sea Region.

4.2.5 In what way does your country promote new investigation techniques, research and documentation of drug related crime?

Member States use investigation techniques such as controlled deliveries, undercover agents, simulated purchases in combating drug trafficking and drug related crime. Some Member States have at their disposal tools such as a specialist research centre, a national network of drug experts and a computerised system for the collection, development and analysis of data on operations against the illegal traffic in drugs. A number of Member States refer to research carried out or being carried out on drug-related crime.

5. International

5.1.3 During the reference period, which Candidate Countries has your country supported, with technical assistance and/or finance where necessary, in their efforts to counter drug abuse and drug trafficking?

Almost all Member States have provided assistance to the candidate countries in their efforts to combat drug abuse and trafficking. This assistance has taken a number of forms such as:

Participation in the PHARE programme and in particular in twinning projects under this programme;

Organisation of study visits and seminars and provision of training to law enforcement officers;

The signing of bilateral co-operation agreements in relation to internal security matters;

Funding to the Council of Europe's Pompidou Group in the framework of training in drug demand reduction interventions provided to Central and Eastern European countries;

Provision of financial assistance to drug related projects in candidate countries; and

Provision of technical assistance and equipment.

5.1.5 Has your country implemented the pre-accession pact on organised crime and extended it to all applicant countries?

A number of Member States refer to the utilisation of the PHARE programme in the implementation of the Pre-accession pact on organised crime and to the Council working group with responsibility for overseeing its implementation. In the context of the Pre-accession Pact contact points have been established.

5.2.2 and 5.2.3 How has your country co-ordinated its projects in third countries with other countries, multilateral and international organisations to enable their assessment? In this framework, has the co-operation with multilateral and international organisations been strengthened where this would increase the effectiveness of the actions carried out?

Member States provide drug-related assistance to third countries on a bilateral basis and/or through the UNODC. Some Member States (Austria, France, Germany, Sweden, and the UK) indicate that they co-ordinate their bilateral projects with other Member States, multilateral and international organisations. A number of Member States refer to the provision of information to the Commission on drug-related assistance to third countries. The Dublin Group and the "major donors group" of the UNODC are cited as primary mechanisms for co-ordination and for strengthening co-operation with multilateral and international institutions. In this regard Member States also refer to their membership of or observer status to the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs, the Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe, CICAD and the work of the Paris Pact initiative. In the context of co-operation with Latin America and the Caribbean some Member States refer to the Co-ordination and Co-operation Mechanism on Drugs between the EU, Latin America and the Caribbean.

5.2.4 What resources have been made available for third countries for the implementation of programmes and projects for supply reduction and demand reduction? In what way have the projects undertaken been reported to the Horizontal Drugs Group of the Council?

Many Member States provide financial assistance to demand reduction and/or supply reduction projects in third countries. Most of these countries indicate that the Commission and the Council's Horizontal Drugs Group are kept informed of their drug-related assistance to third countries.

5.2.5 Please describe in what way, in relations with non-candidate and non-European countries, all relevant Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) instruments take full account of the aims of the EU-Drug Strategy.

A number of Member States (Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and the UK) affirm that in their relations with non-candidate and non-European countries in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy they take account of the objectives of the EU Drugs Strategy.

5.2.6 Has your country drawn up an action plan on drugs co-operation with North Africa and implemented fully the action plans on Latin America and the Caribbean and Central Asia?

No Member State has drawn up an action plan on drugs with North Africa. With regard to the implementation of the plans with Latin America and the Caribbean and Central Asia, Member States refer to the training, technical and financial assistance they provide and law enforcement operational co-operation.

5.2.7 Please describe the measures, if any, your country has taken to help non-EU countries and regions to develop their anti-money laundering systems

A number of Member States refer to co-operation with non-EU countries to develop and improve anti-money laundering systems under the auspices of the Egmont Group (Belgium, France, and Greece) and to participation in the work of the Council of Europe's anti-money laundering programme PC-R-EV recently renamed Moneyval (Belgium and the Netherlands). Member States also refer to participation in the PHARE anti-money laundering programme and in initiatives of the FATF (Financial Action Task Force). Other assistance provided by Member States include study visits by/to non-EU Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs), participation in IMF and World Bank evaluations, financial support and observer status in FATF regional bodies.

5.2.8 Please describe the tools used to support the development of a common international set of indicators in the field of demand reduction and to promote a common standard for national reporting to international organisations

Many Member States refer to their participation in the work of the EMCDDA in the development of a common international set of indicators in the demand reduction field. Member States also refer to the work of the Pompidou Group and the UN and to all of these bodies in the context of promoting a common standard for national reporting to international organisations.

5.2.9 Please describe the measures used by your country to integrate drugs as a cross-sectional issue into supranational co-operation schemes (particularly with the developing countries)

Member States affirm that they see drugs as being a cross-sectional issue and stress the importance of dialogue on this issue within bodies such as the Dublin Group and the UN.

ANNEX 2

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU ACTION PLAN ON DRUGS 2000-2004:

FOLLOW-UP TABLE FOR THE COMMISSION, THE EMCDDA AND EUROPOL [37]

+++++ TABLE +++++

ANNEX 3

Instruments of the European Union in the field of drugs (2000 - 2004).

A. Instruments of the EU adopted during the period 1 January 2000 - 31 July 2004.

- Council Resolution on cannabis. CORDROGUE 59 - 07.07.2004

- Progress report in relation to the Implementation Plans on Demand and Supply Reduction of Drugs and the Supply of Synthetic drugs - CORDROGUE 43 - 14.06.2004

- Council Recommendation regarding guidelines for taking samples of seized drugs. CORDROGUE 26 - 30.03.2004

- Regulation (EC) no 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors. OJ L 47, 18.02.2004 - P.1

-Council Decision 2003/847/JHA of 27 November 2003 concerning control measures and criminal sanctions in respect of the new synthetic drugs 2C-I, 2C-T-2, 2C-T-7 and TMA-2,OJ L 321,06.12.2003 - P. 64

- Resolution of the Council on combating the impact of psychoactive substances use on road accidents. CORDROGUE 97 - 13.11.2003

- Council resolution on the posting of liaison officers with particular expertise in drugs to Albania. CORDROGUE 95 - 13.11.2003

- Council Resolution of 17 December 2003 on training for drug law enforcement officers. CORDROGUE 96 - 12.11.2003

- Council Resolution on the importance of the role of the families in preventing drug abuse by adolescents. CORDROGUE 94 - 12.11.2003

- Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on coordination on drugs in the European Union. COM/2003/0681 final - 12.11.2003

- Resolution of the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, for the development of education curricula on substance misuse disorders for medical and other care students and professionals and their inclusion in university studies. CORDROGUE 57 - 19.06.2003

- Resolution of the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council for the integration of the effective management (diagnosis, brief intervention, referrals) and medically assisted treatment for opiate dependent patients within the national health care. CORDROGUE 56 - 19.06.2003

- Council Recommendation of 18 June 2003 on the prevention and reduction of health-related harm associated with drug dependence. OJ L 165, 03.07.2003 P.31

- Resolution of the Council on the importance of early intervention to prevent drug dependence and drug related harm among young people using drugs. CORDROGUE 58 - 13.06.2003

- Implementation paper on demand and supply reduction to deliver the EU Drugs Action Plan. CORDROGUE 40 - 27.05.2003

- Action Plan on Drugs between the EU and Countries of Western Balkans and Candidate Countries (Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey). CORDROGUE 3 REV 2 - 23.05.2003

- Agreement between the European Community and the Turkish Republic on precursors and chemical substances frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances. OJ L 064, 07.03.2003 - P.30

- Resolution of the Representatives of the Member States meeting within the Council on the treatment of drug abusers in prisons. CORDROGUE 54 REV 4 - 28.11. 2002

- Implementation plan on actions to be taken in regard to the supply of synthetic drugs. CORDROGUE 81 REV 2 - 26.11.2002

- Council Resolution on the generic classification of specific groups of new synthetic drugs. CORDROGUE 64 REV 4 - 11.11. 2002

- Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European parliament on the mid-term evaluation of the EU action plan on drugs. (2000-2004). COM(2002)599, 04.11.2002

- Council Decision of 30 September 2002 adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area (2002-2006). OJ L 232, 29.10.2002 - P.1

- Decision No 1786/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 adopting a programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003-2008). OJ L 271, 09.10.2002 - P.1

- Action plan on Drugs between the EU and Central Asian republics (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan). CORDROGUE 78 - 25.09.2002

- Council Decision of 22 July 2002 establishing a framework programme on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (AGIS). OJ L 203, 01.08.2002 - P.5

- Commission Regulation (EC) No 1232/2002 of 9 July 2002 replacing the Annex to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3677/90 laying down measures to be taken to discourage the diversion of certain substances to the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and amending Regulation (EEC) No 3769/92 . OJ L 180, 10.07.2002 - P.5

- Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on joint investigation teams. OJ L 162, 20.06.2002 - P.1

- Council Regulation (EC) No 988/2002 of 3 June 2002 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3677/90 laying down measures to be taken to discourage the diversion of certain substances to the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substancesOJ L 151, 11.06.2002 - P.1

- Resolution of the Council on the incorporation of drug prevention in school curricula. CORDROGUE 4 REV 3 - 08.05. 2002

- Council Recommendation of 25 April 2002 on improving investigation methods in the fight against organised crime linked to organised drug trafficking: simultaneous investigations into drug trafficking by criminal organisations and their finances/assets. OJ C 114, 15.05.2002 - P.1

- Council Recommendation of 25 April 2002 on the need to enhance cooperation and exchanges of information between the various operational units specialising in combating trafficking in precursors in the Member States of the European Union. OJ C 114, 15.05.2002 - P.3

- Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Member States on the prevention of the recreational use of drugs. CORDROGUE 2 REV 3 - 15.04. 2002

- Council Decision of 28 February 2002 concerning control measures and criminal sanctions in respect of the new synthetic drug PMMA. OJ L 063, 06.03.2002 - P. 14

- Joint declaration on drugs of the Ministers of the European Union in association with the European Commission, and the Candidate Countries. CORDROGUE 7 REV 2 - 15.02 2002

- Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004. OJ L 346, 31.12.2001- P.1

- Directive 2001/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2001 amending Council Directive 91/308/EEC on prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering - Commission Declaration. OJ L 344, 28.12.2001- P. 76

- Council Resolution on the implementation of the five key epidemiological indicators on drugs, developed by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). CORDROGUE 67- 15.11.2001

- Council Act of 16 October 2001 establishing, in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union, the Protocol to the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union.OJ C 326, 21.11.2001 - P.1

- Council Decision of 28 June 2001 establishing a programme of incentives and exchanges, training and cooperation for the prevention of crime (Hippokrates). OJ L 186, 07.07.2001 - P. 11

- Council Framework Decision of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime. OJ L 182, 05.07.2001 - P. 1

- Council Decision of 28 June 2001 establishing a second phase of incentives, exchanges, training and cooperation for law enforcement authorities (Oisin II) - OJ L 186, 07.07.2001 - P.4

- Council Regulation (EC) No 1116/2001 of 5 June 2001 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3677/90 laying down measures to be taken to discourage the diversion of certain substances to the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.O J L 153, 08.06.2001 - P. 4

- Council Decision of 28 May 2001 setting up a European crime prevention network. OJ L 153, 08.06.2001 - P.1

- Council Decision of 28 May 2001 on the transmission of samples of controlled substances.O J L 150, 06.06.2001 - P.1

- Council recommendation on the alignment of law enforcement drug and diverted precursors statistics. STUP 26 - 30.10.2001 and STUP 29-13.11.2001

- Council conclusions on networking information on emerging trends and patterns in drug abuse and poly-drug use and the associated risks. O J C 017, 19.01.2001 - P. 2

- Initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to adopting a JHA Council Decision establishing a system of special forensic profiling analysis of synthetic drugs. OJ C 10, 12.01.2001 - P. 1

- Council Decision of 17 October 2000 concerning arrangements for cooperation between financial intelligence units of the Member States in respect of exchanging information. OJ L 271, 24.10.2000 - P. 4

- Council Regulation (EC) No 2220/2000 of 28 September 2000 amending Regulation (EEC) No 302/93 on the establishment of a European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. OJ L 253, 07.10.2000 - P.1

- Council Decision of 28 September 2000 on the conclusion of an agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway on the participation of Norway in the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. OJ L 257, 11.10.2000 - P.23

- Commission Regulation (EC) No 1610/2000 of 24 July 2000 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3769/92 implementing and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3677/90 laying down measures to be taken to discourage the diversion of certain substances to the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. JO L 185, 25.07.2000 - P.30

- Convention established by the Council in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union, on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union. JO C 197, 12.07.2000 - P-3

B. Pending EU instruments.

- Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering, including terrorist financing. COM (2004) 448 - 30.06.2004

- Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors". UD 81, CORDROGUE, COMER 120, 30.06.2004

- Proposal for a Council Regulation on the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (recast). COM (2003) 808 (01) - 19.12.2003

- Draft Council Recommendation on the monitoring of the chemical composition of narcotics, in order to improve investigation results in the fight against transnational drug trafficking within the European Union. CORDROGUE 82-13.11.2003

- Proposal for a Council Decision on the information exchange, risk-assessment and the control on new narcotic drugs and new synthetic drugs. COM(2003)0560 final - 03.10.2003.

- Initiative by the Kingdom of Spain for the conclusion of a Convention on the suppression by customs administrations of illicit drug trafficking on the high seas. JO C 45, 19.02.2002

- Proposal for a Council framework Decision laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking. COM (001) 259 final 23.05.2001. OJ C 304 E, 30.10.2001 - P.172

[1] KOM(1999)239 galīgā versija 26.5.1999.

[2] Cordrogue 64, Rev 3, 12555/3/99., 1.12.1999.

[3] Cordrogue 32, 9283/00, 7.6.2000.

[4] KOM(2002)599 galīgā versija, 4.11.2002.

[5] Ja nav savādāk noradīts, atsauces uz dalībvalstīm ir atsauces uz pirmajām 15 dalībvalstīm.

[6] Dokumenti ir pieejami www.emcdda.eu.int vai www.europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home un www.europa.eu.int/comm/taxation_customs

[7] Pieejams www.emcdda.eu.int

[8] Skatīt www.europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home

[9] Krimorga 43, pārskatīts3 9615/3/03

[10] Cordrogue 81, pārskatīts 2 12452/2/02

[11] Cordrogue 40, pārskatīts 2 8926/2/03

[12] Cordrogue 43, 10481/04

[13] 1. Narkotiku lietošanas pakāpe un modelis kopējā populācijā. 2. Narkotiku lietošanas problēmas izplatība 3. Narkomānu pieprasījums pēc medicīniskās palīdzības 4. Nāves gadījumi skaits, kuri saistīti ar narkotiku lietošanu un 5. Infekcijas slimību izplatības, kas saistīta ar narkotiku lietošanu.

[14] OV L 167, 25.06.1997., 1. lpp.

[15] OV L 19, 22.1.1997., 25. lpp.

[16] OV L 271, 9.10.2002., 1. lpp.

[17] OV L 165, 03.07.2003., 31.lpp.

[18] KOM(2003)311 galīgā versija.

[19] Cordrogue 97, 13.11.2003.

[20] Direktīva 91/308/EEK, 0V L166, 28.06.1991., 77. lpp.

[21] Direktīva 2001/97/EK , OV L 344, 28.12.2001., 76. lpp.

[22] OV L 162, 20.06.2002., 1.lpp.

[23] OV C 197, 12.07.2000., 1.lpp.

[24] OV C 24, 23.01.1998., 2.lpp.

[25] OV C 316, 27.11.95., 34.lpp.

[26] skatīt 21. zemteksta piezīmi.

[27] OV L 203, 01.08.2002., 5.lpp.

[28] KOM(2001)259 galīgā versija

[29] OV L 47, 18.02.2004., 1.lpp.

[30] KOM(2004)244 galīgā versija

[31] KOM(2004)448, 30.06.2004.

[32] OV L 271, 24.10.2000., 4.lpp.

[33] Stup 26, 30.10.2001, Stup 29, 13.11.2001.

[34] See section 2.2

[35] Tālākai izpētei skatīt aktuālo informāciju un tematisko dokumentu "galvenās atziņas par izmeklēšanas novērtējumu narkotiku politikas jomā Eiropas Savienībā" EMCDDA mājas lapā.

[36] The AGIS programme (Framework programme on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters) started in 2003 and incorporates previous Title VI programmes, such as Falcone and OISIN.

[37] Only thetk[38]k[39]k[pic] [pic];Ŧ[pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic] actions where the Commission, the EMCDDA and EUROPOL are directly involved are analysed.