C 274/28 EN 9.11.2002 Official Journal of the European Communities
— breach of Articles 8, 12 and 14 of the European
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms;
— Disregard of general principles of law, such as non-
discrimination and equal treatment, equal pay for men
and women, respect for private and family life, the
principle that the civil status of Community nationals is
to be governed by the legislation of their MemberState, proper administration, the protection of legitimate
expectations.
Action brought on 30 August 2002 by Raiffeisen Zentral-bank Österreich Aktiengesellschaft against the Com-
mission of the European Communities
(Case T-259/02)
(2002/C 274/50)
(Language of the Case: German)
An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 30 August 2002 by Raiffeisen
Zentralbank Österreich Aktiengesellschaft, established in Vien-na, represented by S. Völcker, Lawyer.
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— annul the Commission decision of 11 June 2002
(C(2002)2091 final) in so far as it relates to the applicant;
— in the alternative, reduce the fine of
EUR 30 380 000 imposed on the applicant in the
defendant’s decision;
— order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The proceeding conducted by the defendant was directed
against regular meetings of banks in Austria (‘Bankenrunden’).By the contested decision the Commission found that the
applicant — together with seven other Austrian banking
institutions — had infringed Article 81 EC by participating in
agreements and concerted practices concerning prices, charges
and advertising measures, designed to restrict competition onthe Austrian banking market from 1 January 1995 until
24 June 1998. The Commission imposed fines on the banks
concerned.The applicant submits first of all that the defendant wrongly
assumed that the arrangements in the present case could affecttrade between States. The Austrian banks’ arrangements were
restricted exclusively to Austria. Nor were they liable, given
the nature of the service in question, to partition the Austrian
market. There is therefore no infringement of Article 81
EC. Furthermore, there is no basis for the Commission’srequirement to cease the infringement in the future. The
Commission itself found that the applicant had brought the
arrangements to an end on 24 June 1998.
The applicant also contests the classification of the infringe-
ment as ‘very serious’ for the purposes of the guidelines on
the calculation of fines. When assessing the gravity of the
infringement, the Commission disregarded in particular the
fact that the Bankenrunden were not established by the banksexpressly to interfere with competition but, on the contrary,
took place over 50 years in accordance with Austrian law and
— to the end — with the cooperation of State authorities.
Furthermore, the applicant contests the calculation of the fine
imposed on it. In disregard of the links in the rural cooperative
sector and inconsistently with settled case-law, the Com-
mission attributed to the applicant market shares of undertak-
ings in which it had no stake and whose market conduct itcould not determine. In addition, the Commission rejected all
mitigating grounds put forward without considering them
sufficiently. Finally, the Commission misapplied the Leniency
Notice (
1).
(1) Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines
in cartel cases (OJ C 207 of 18.7.1996, p. 4).
Action brought on 2 September 2002 by Bank Austria
Creditanstalt AG against the Commission of the European
Communities
(Case T-260/02)
(2002/C 274/51)
(Language of the Case: German)
An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of theEuropean Communities on 2 September 2002 by Bank
Austria Creditanstalt AG, established in Vienna, represented
by C. Zschocke and J. Beninca, Lawyers.