10.11.2001 EN C 317/35 Official Journal of the European Communities
Pleas in law and principal arguments lenging the decision. The applicant also disputes the stipulation
in the decision that other information and supporting docu-ments were necessary. According to the applicant it hadThe applicant is a non-governmental organisation whosesubmitted all the necessary documents and, if the Commissionobjects are to fight racism and to protect the interests ofrequired other material, it should have requested it from theimmigrants in the European Union. To that end the applicantapplicant.received subsidies from the Commission for the year 2000, in
accordance with the agreement entered into by the two parties.
In the challenged decision the Council terminated that financial
aid because of financial irregularities established against the
applicant.
Action brought on 24 September 2001 by Calberson G.E. In support of its action the applicant relies on:
against the Commission of the European Communities
— failure to observe the general conditions of the grant
agreement of 24 May 2000; (Case T-220/01)
— failure to respect the rights of the defence in an adminis-(2001/C 317/69)trative case. According to the applicant the disputed
decision was made without the applicant being heard and
(Language of the case: French) was not based on proper reasons;
— breach of the principle of legitimate expectations. An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 24 September 2001 by CalbersonG.E., a company established in Paris, represented by Thierry
Gallois, lawyer.
The applicant claims that the Court should: Action brought on 21 September 2001 by Laboratoire
Monique Remy against the Commission of the European
— order the Commission to pay to the applicant compen- Communities
sation equal to the amounts of the following invoices:
(Case T-218/01)— BRU 0135 963 for DEM 82 991,96 — additional
loading charges;
(2001/C 317/68)
— BRU 0135 098 for DEM 900 corresponding to fines
paid to the Polish authorities; (Language of the case: French)
— BRU 0135 099 for DEM 6 960 corresponding toAn action against the Commission of the European Communi-fines paid to the Polish authorities;ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 21 September 2001 by Laboratoire— BRU 0135 964 for DEM 16 050 — the cost ofMonique Remy, established at Grasse (France), represented byplastic sheeting charged by the store manager;Jean-Félix Pupel, lawyer.
— order that interest at the legal rate be added to the
compensation from the 8th day after each unpaid invoice; The applicant challenges Commission Decision C(2001)1380
of 2 July 2001 withdrawing the financial assistance granted
— order that all the costs be paid by the Commission. to the applicant by Commission Decision C(93)3185 of
10 November 1993 concerning the grant of aid from theEAGGF Guidance Section pursuant to Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4256/88 in the context of Project No 93.FR.06.027Pleas in law and principal argumentsentitled: ‘Pilot project to demonstrate exploitation of the Iris, a
Mediterranean plant, for the luxury perfume industry and food
flavourings (France, Spain, Greece)’.This case concerns the execution of Lots 5 and 7 of Regulation
No 1799/1999 on the transport of beef from the interventionstock in Germany to Russia. Under the terms of that regulation,
the applicant was to provide, at the departure points, servicesPleas in law and principal argumentscomprising handling and loading the means of transport. The
applicant invoiced the intervention agency for those services
in compliance with the quotation which had been given to the The applicant claims that the decision does not observe the
code of sound administrative conduct because it does not applicant by the intervention agency, which had itself received
the quotation from the company managing the store. contain any information concerning the possibilities of chal-
C 317/36 EN 10.11.2001 Official Journal of the European Communities
According to the applicant, the company managing the store 23 September 1999, the contract in respect of Lot No 5 for
the transport of 6 500 tonnes of skimmed-milk powder from did not properly carry out its loading obligations, and as the
Polish police found overloading, they levied fines on the Ireland to Russia.
applicant. Also, the managing company required prior pay-
ment of the additional charges for those loading operations. According to the applicant the intervention agency, the
Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development
(D.A.F.) sent it the goods with substantial delay, which forcedIn support of its claims, the applicant relies on the contractualit to pay demurrage to the owner of the ship which it hadand non-contractual liability of the Commission.chartered.
The applicant relies on the same arguments as in CaseIn support of its claims seeking compensation for the lossesT-215/01, taking account of the fact that in the present casesuffered, the applicant pleads contractual liability and, alterna-the additional charges were caused by the actions of thetively, non-contractual liability of the Commission by puttingwarehouse of the intervention agency, which required priorforward pleas and arguments similar to those presented inpayment of an additional sum for releasing and loading theCase T-215/01.goods and carried out the relevant operations badly, exposing
the applicant to the fines.
(1) Commission Regulation (CE) No 1815/1999 of 18 August 1999
on the supply of skimmed-milk powder to Russia (OJ 1999 L 220,
p. 13).
Action brought on 24 September 2001 by Calberson G.E.
against the Commission of the European CommunitiesRemoval from the Register of Case T-42/00 (1)
(Case T-221/01) (2001/C 317/71)
(Language of the case: German) (2001/C 317/70)
By order of 5 June 2001, the President of the Second Chamber(Language of the case: French)of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
has ordered the removal from the Register of CaseAn action against the Commission of the European Communi-T-42/00, City-Broker Deutschland GmbH v the Office forties was brought before the Court of First Instance of theHarmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks andEuropean Communities on 24 September 2001 by CalbersonDesigns).G.E., a company established in Paris, represented by Thierry
Gallois, lawyer.
(1) OJ C 135 of 13.5.00.
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— order the Commission to pay to the applicant compen-
sation equal to the totals of invoices BRU 114 4316Removal from the Register of Case T-359/00 (1)(USD 25 761,11) and BRU 413 1828 (23 115,49 Euros);
(2001/C 317/72)— order interest at the legal rate to be added to the
compensation from the 8th day following each unpaid(Language of the case: Spanish)invoice;
By order of 21 June 2001, the President of the Fourth Chamber— order that all the costs be paid by the Commission.of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-359/00,
Organizacio ´ n de Productores Asociados de Grandes Atuneros
Pleas in law and principal arguments Congeladores (OPAGAC) y Empresarios Asociados v Com-
mission of the European Communities.
The applicant states that, in the context of Regulation
(1) OJ C 45 of 10.2.01. No 1815/1999 (1), the Commission awarded it, by decision of