10.11.2001 EN C 317/35 Official Journal of the European Communities
Pleas in law and principal arguments lenging the decision. The applicant also disputes the stipulation
in the decision that other information and supporting docu-ments were necessary. According to the applicant it hadThe applicant is a non-governmental organisation whosesubmitted all the necessary documents and, if the Commissionobjects are to fight racism and to protect the interests ofrequired other material, it should have requested it from theimmigrants in the European Union. To that end the applicantapplicant.received subsidies from the Commission for the year 2000, in
accordance with the agreement entered into by the two parties.
In the challenged decision the Council terminated that financial
aid because of financial irregularities established against the
applicant.
Action brought on 24 September 2001 by Calberson G.E. In support of its action the applicant relies on:
against the Commission of the European Communities
— failure to observe the general conditions of the grant
agreement of 24 May 2000; (Case T-220/01)
— failure to respect the rights of the defence in an adminis-(2001/C 317/69)trative case. According to the applicant the disputed
decision was made without the applicant being heard and
(Language of the case: French) was not based on proper reasons;
— breach of the principle of legitimate expectations. An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 24 September 2001 by CalbersonG.E., a company established in Paris, represented by Thierry
Gallois, lawyer.
The applicant claims that the Court should: Action brought on 21 September 2001 by Laboratoire
Monique Remy against the Commission of the European
— order the Commission to pay to the applicant compen- Communities
sation equal to the amounts of the following invoices:
(Case T-218/01)— BRU 0135 963 for DEM 82 991,96 — additional
loading charges;
(2001/C 317/68)
— BRU 0135 098 for DEM 900 corresponding to fines
paid to the Polish authorities; (Language of the case: French)
— BRU 0135 099 for DEM 6 960 corresponding toAn action against the Commission of the European Communi-fines paid to the Polish authorities;ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 21 September 2001 by Laboratoire— BRU 0135 964 for DEM 16 050 — the cost ofMonique Remy, established at Grasse (France), represented byplastic sheeting charged by the store manager;Jean-Félix Pupel, lawyer.
— order that interest at the legal rate be added to the
compensation from the 8th day after each unpaid invoice; The applicant challenges Commission Decision C(2001)1380
of 2 July 2001 withdrawing the financial assistance granted
— order that all the costs be paid by the Commission. to the applicant by Commission Decision C(93)3185 of
10 November 1993 concerning the grant of aid from theEAGGF Guidance Section pursuant to Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4256/88 in the context of Project No 93.FR.06.027Pleas in law and principal argumentsentitled: ‘Pilot project to demonstrate exploitation of the Iris, a
Mediterranean plant, for the luxury perfume industry and food
flavourings (France, Spain, Greece)’.This case concerns the execution of Lots 5 and 7 of Regulation
No 1799/1999 on the transport of beef from the interventionstock in Germany to Russia. Under the terms of that regulation,
the applicant was to provide, at the departure points, servicesPleas in law and principal argumentscomprising handling and loading the means of transport. The
applicant invoiced the intervention agency for those services
in compliance with the quotation which had been given to the The applicant claims that the decision does not observe the
code of sound administrative conduct because it does not applicant by the intervention agency, which had itself received
the quotation from the company managing the store. contain any information concerning the possibilities of chal-