EN Official Journal of the European Union CE 78/936

(2004/C 78 E/0990)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0157/04

by Catherine Guy-Quint (PSE) to the Commission

(22 January 2004)

Subject: Twinnings with Bulgaria and Romania

I would like to draw your attention to the arrangements for 2004 as regards the future of twinnings between EU countries and candidate countries. I note that twinnings with Bulgaria and Romania have been excluded from the selection procedures described in Call for proposals No 64/03 published by the Directorate-General for Education and Culture, when no mention of such a restriction is to be found in any of the documents deriving from the interinstitutional work that preceded the publication of that call for proposals. My question therefore relates both to the legal validity of that interpretation and to the political appropriateness of these countries not being eligible to receive Community grants for twinnings.

With the aim of providing the Community action programme to promote active European citizenship (civic participation) with the formal legal basis which the new 2002 Financial Regulation requires for Community grants, and following the forwarding of the European Commission's basic proposal (1) and the European Parliament's report (A5-0368/2003), Parliament issued an opinion on the proposal for a Council decision on 20 November 2003. The report made no reference to the possible restriction of twinnings with candidate countries whose accession had been confirmed for 2004. Quite the contrary, it stated that ‘As part of the enlargement of the European Union, it is essential that there should be a significant increase over 2003 in the volume of appropriations made available to town twinning schemes.’

Furthermore, from a political perspective, it seems relevant to point to the usefulness of supporting town twinning activities fostering active European citizenship. In the current context of extending the scope of European citizenship to future Member States, all states should be able to benefit from these measures, without distinction. The very large numbers of twinnings in those countries supports this view. Romania, for example, has, since 1990, participated in over 231 twinning projects funded by the European Commission, making for an average markedly higher than many Member States (source: Directorate-General for Education and Culture). Why, in that case, break the continuity of something that has been pursued for many years in terms of know-how, experience exchanges and therefore of creating a requisite sense of European citizenship in those countries which are to accede to the Union?

As Mrs Reding stated at the ‘Golden stars of town-twinning’ awards ceremony on 14 May 2003, European integration (at local level) would not be where it is today without the efforts and goodwill of people who devote their time to creating partnerships with citizens and organisations from other towns and cities across Europe. Three of the ten prizes awarded at that ceremony went to projects initiated by candidate countries. I would therefore like to know why and on what legal bases the Commission is creating a distinction between the candidate countries as regards eligibility for a measure that is of benefit to them all, and whose success is widely acknowledged.

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(13 February 2004)

The Commission entirely shares the Honourable Member's opinion regarding the importance of town-twinning activities involving candidate countries and in no way seeks to make a distinction between candidate countries, nor to exclude Romania and Bulgaria, nor Turkey for that matter, from the possibilities offered in this field by the recently adopted Community action programme to promote active European citizenship (civic participation).

The proposal for a Council decision presented by the Commission (2) and adopted by the Council on 26 January 2004 provides for this programme to be open to the candidate countries, and the call for proposals EAC No 64/03 also mentions these countries as being eligible, subject to the conclusion of agreements establishing the arrangements for their participation.

In accordance with the decisions of the Association Councils, which lay down the principles, conditions and general arrangements for the participation of candidate countries in all Community programmes as part of the pre-accession strategy, the specific arrangements for participation in each programme must be the subject of a Memorandum of Understanding to be concluded between the Commission and the country expressing an interest. Just as Community grants are subject to the adoption of the decision establishing the programme, which alone provides the formal legal basis required by the new Financial Regulation for Community grants, so the grants intended for candidate countries are subject to these Memoranda of Understanding.

The same approach is followed for all candidate countries, i.e. Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey. In accordance with the provisions of the Accession Treaty, the countries acceding in 2004 participate in the Community programmes as Member States.

Aware of the importance of the twinning movement for the three candidate countries, even before the adoption of the programme at Community level, the Commission has already contacted the Missions of these countries to give them the relevant information concerning the procedures to be followed.

(1) COM(2003)276.

(2) COM(2003) 276 final.