(2000/C 27 E/070) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1418/99
by Roberta Angelilli (NI) to the Commission
(1 September 1999)
Subject: Financing to the value of 5000 billion lire provided by the Italian state railway company to certain
trade unions
By means of a notarial deed of 10 May 1995 which was drawn up between the Italian state railway
company (FS) and the FILT-CGIL, FIT-CISL, FISAFS-CISAL and UIL-Transporti trade unions, railway
workers recreational facilities were transferred free of charge to the abovementioned trade union bodies.
These facilities comprise buildings in Rome, Bologna, Verona, Turin, Milan, Naples, Pisa, etc., 60 filmprojection rooms, 84 tennis complexes, 300 games rooms, 160 cafeterias, 400 bars, 160 libraries, luxuryhotels, day nurseries, billiard rooms, allotments, campsites, skating rinks, hockey fields, watersports centres,beach resorts, sports complexes, football fields, volleyball and basketball courts, etc.. They represent aturnover of approximately 800 billion lire and their total value is estimated at approximately 5000 billionlire. An annual 0,12 % levy is deducted from the wages of railway employees and 20 % commission ischarged on all organised stays, on enrolment charges and on the fees paid by approximately 270 railwaystaff who work at the DLF but are paid by the FS.
In view of the above, can the Commission say whether:
1. there are any European directives which prevent trade unions from being financed by employers?
2. such a transfer constitutes a distortion of free competition in the leisure and tourism sector?
3. it considers (in view of the fact that the FS is publicly owned) that the transfer constitutes a serious
loss of public assets which in this instance have been given to private individuals belonging to non-recognised associations?
4. it considers that the transfer interferes with the current privatisation of the FS?
5. it is to express a general view on the matter?
Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission
(6 October 1999)
The Commission has no information about the notarial deed of 10 May 1995 and in particular the details
pertaining to the transfer.
1. There are no European directives on the financing of trade unions by employers. The financing of
trade unions is governed by the rules and customs specific to the national social traditions.
2. As regards the possibility of distorting free competition in the leisure and tourism sector, it seems
quite unlikely that this transfer will have any impact at Community level: the consequences for the marketare much the same irrespective of whether the Dopolavoro ferroviario is managed directly by the Ferroviedello Stato (FS) or by the trade unions.
3. FS is a limited company in the form of a Società per Azione (SpA). Prseumably the FS took the
transfer decision of its own accord. It is not for the Commission to pronounce on the advisability or
impact of this decision. Besides, the legal form under which the trade unions operate, which is governedby the rules and customs particular to the national social traditions, does not a priori rule out theirmanaging the assets of Dopolavoro.
4. Pursuant to Article 295 (ex-Article 222), the EC Treaty in no way prejudices the rules in Member
States governing the system of property ownership and the Commission therefore does not pursue aprivatisation policy. Hence it is not for the Commission to pronounce on the privatisation policies of theMember States.
5. Since management of the assets of Dopolavoro is a national prerogative, the Commission considers
that it is not competent to pronounce on this matter.29.1.2000 EN C 27 E/59 Official Journal of the European Communities