ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 305/36

Order of the General Court of 24 June 2016 — Onix Asigurări v EIOPA

(Case T-590/15) (1)

((Action for failure to act, for annulment and for damages - Application for an inquiry to be opened into the alleged infringement of EU law - Decision of the Chair of EIOPA not to open an inquiry - Decision of the Appeals Committee to dismiss as inadmissible the complaint - Time-limits for bringing proceedings - Act not open to challenge - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis))

(2016/C 305/50)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Onix Asigurări SA (Bucarest, Romania) (represented by: M. Vladu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (represented by: C. Coucke and S. Dispiter, Agents, and H.-G. Kamman, lawyer)

Re:

First, primarily, an application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that EIOPA illegally failed to take a decision against the incorrect application, by the Istituto per la Vigilanza sulle Assicurazioni (IVASS, the Italian supervisory authority for the insurance sector), of Article 40(6) of Council Directive 92/49/EEC of 18 June 1992 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and amending Directives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (third non-life insurance Directive) (OJ 1992 L 228, p. 1) and, in the alternative, an application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision EIOPA-14-267 of the Chair of EIOPA dated 6 June 2014 on the opening of an inquiry under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/79/EC (OJ 2010 L 331, p. 48), and of Decision BOA 2015 001 of the Appeals Committee dated 3 August 2015, rejecting as inadmissible an appeal brought by Onix Asigurări under Article 60 of Regulation No 1094/2010 and, secondly, an application based on Article 268 TFEU and seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant on account of the abovementioned omission and the adoption of those decisions.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Onix Asigurări SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA).

(1) OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/39

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 May 2016 — Pari Pharma v EMA

(Case T-235/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the EMA concerning information submitted by an undertaking as part of its application for authorisation to place a medicinal product on the market - Order granting suspension of operation of the decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Application for cancellation - No change in circumstances - Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court))

(2016/C 260/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pari Pharma GmbH (Starnberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Epping and W. Rehmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: T. Jabłoński, N. Rampal Olmedo, A. Spina, A. Rusanov and S. Marino, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Novartis Europharm Ltd (Camberley, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court seeking the cancellation of the order of 1 September 2015 in Pari Pharma v EMA (T-235/15 R, EU:T:2015:587), by which it granted the suspension of operation of Decision EMA/271043/2015 of the EMA of 24 April 2015, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to certain documents containing information submitted in the context of an application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Vantobra.

Operative part of the order

1. The request seeking the cancellation of the order of 1 September 2015 in Pari Pharma v EMA (T-235/15 R, EU:T:2015:587) is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/33

Order of the General Court of 19 September 2016 — Indecopi v EUIPO — Synergy Group (PISCO SOUR)

(Case T-447/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 402/44

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — EDF Luminus v Parliament

(Case T-384/15) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Electricity supply contract CNT (2009) No 137 - Payment by the Parliament of the regional contribution made by the applicant to the Brussels-Capital Region and calculated on the basis of the power made available to the Parliament - No contractual obligation - No obligation under national law))

(2016/C 402/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: EDF Luminus (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Verhoeven and O. Vanden Berghe, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Darie and P. Biström, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and I. Martínez del Peral, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 272 TFEU seeking an order for the Parliament to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 439 672,95, plus interest, being the amount of the regional contribution paid by the applicant to the Brussels-Capital Region and calculated on the basis of the power made available to the Parliament.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The Parliament’s claim for a declaratory judgment is dismissed.

3. EDF Luminus shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Parliament.

4. The European Commission shall bear its own costs

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 19 September 2016 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v Frontex

(Case T-613/15) (1)

(2016/C 454/56)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 7, 11.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/36

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-714/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/65)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/16

Order of the General Court of 28 March 2017 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (VIEWTY SNAP)

(Case T-489/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Wulff and U. Hildebrandt, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2015 (Case R 1938/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH and LG Electronics, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. LG Electronics, Inc., is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/34

Order of the General Court of 25 November 2016 — Stichting Accolade v Commission

(Case T-598/15) (1)

((State aid - Sale of land at prices allegedly below market price - Complaint made by a third party to the Commission - Decision declaring that the contested measure does not constitute aid - Procedure governing the preliminary examination stage under Article 108(2) TFEU and under Article 10(1), Article 13(1) and Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 concerning allegedly unlawful individual aid - Action for annulment brought by a third party - Admissibility - Locus standi - Action designed to safeguard procedural rights - Action challenging the merits of the contested measure - No substantial effect on the competitive position - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 022/46)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Stichting Accolade (Drachten, the Netherlands) (represented by: H. de Boer and J. Abma, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal and S. Noë, acting as agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 4411 final of 30 June 2015 on State aid SA.34676 (2015/NN) — The Netherlands (alleged sale of land below market price by the municipality of Harlingen), by which the Commission decided that the sale of that land to Ludinga Vastgoed BV did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. Stichting Accolade shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 42/25

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 November 2017 — Ferrovial and Others v Commission

(Case T-252/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Aid scheme provided for under Spanish tax legislation - Corporate tax provision which enables Spanish undertakings to write off the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of a shareholding in foreign undertakings - New administrative interpretation - Inclusion in the register of direct acquisitions of shareholdings in foreign companies - Application for a stay of execution - No urgency))

(2018/C 042/36)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Ferrovial, SA (Madrid, Spain), Ferrovial Servicios, SA (Madrid) and Amey UK plc (Oxford, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Muñoz Pérez and M. Linares Gil, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Re:

Application under Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/314 of 15 October 2014 on the State aid SA.35550 (13/C) (ex 13/NN) (ex 12/CP) implemented by Spain Scheme for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions (OJ 2015 L 56, p. 38).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 293/40

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2017 — Aston Martin Lagonda v EUIPO (Representation of a radiator grille)

(Case T-88/15) (1)

(2017/C 293/51)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Saint-Gobain Isover G+H and Others v Commission

(Case T-109/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany), Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland GmbH (Stolberg, Germany), Verallia Deutschland AG, formerly Saint-Gobain Oberland AG (Bad Wurzach, Germany) and Saint-Gobain Sekurit Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG (Herzogenrath, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt et H. Janssen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: R. Sauer, and subsequently by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG, Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland GmbH, Verallia Deutschland AG, formerly Saint-Gobain Oberland AG, and Saint-Gobain Sekurit Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG.

(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 February 2019 — British Aggregates and Others v Commission

(Case T-741/15) (1)

(2019/C 122/36)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/60

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2016 — Dulière v Commission

(Case T-503/16) (1)

(2017/C 022/83)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 4.5.2013 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-15/13 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 475/25

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2016 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-32/16) (1)

(2016/C 475/37)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/38

Order of the General Court of 13 February 2017 — Pipiliagkas v Commission

(Case T-598/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Assignment - Transfer in the interest of the service - Reassignment of the applicant - Implementation of a judgment - Pre-litigation procedure - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 112/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Nikolaos Pipiliagkas (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 266 TFEU and 270 TFEU for annulment, first, of the Commission’s decision not to adopt the measures for compliance with the judgment of 15 April 2015, Pipiliagkas v Commission (F-96/13, EU:F:2015:29), and, secondly, of the Commission’s decision of 22 December 2015 reassigning the applicant from the European Union delegation to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, to the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. Mr Nikolaos Pipiliagkas shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 296, 16.8.2016 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-28/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 53/47

Order of the General Court of 20 December 2016 — Amira and Others v Commission and ECB

(Case T-736/16) (1)

(2017/C 053/58)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 475, 19.12.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/62

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2017 — Wöhlke v EUIPO — Danielle Roches (ALIQUA)

(Case T-173/16) (1)

(2017/C 144/93)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 121/33

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Gollnisch v Parliament

(Case T-624/16 R)

((Interim measures - Member of the European Parliament - Recovery, by way of compensation, of allowances paid as reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 121/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch (Villiers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: N. Fakiroff, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: G. Corstens and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 1 July 2016, relating to recovery from the applicant of a sum of EUR 275 984,23, and of debit note No 2016-916 of 5 July 2016 adopted pursuant to that decision and to the notification of those measures by the Director-General for Finance of 6 July 2016.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/33

Order of the General Court of 3 April 2017 — Corsini Santolaria v EUIPO — Molins Tura (biombo 13)

(Case T-145/16) (1)

(2017/C 178/50)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/44

Order of the General Court of 9 March 2017 — Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções and Gomes de Azevedo v ECB

(Case T-22/16) (1)

((Action for failure to act, for annulment and for damages - Economic and monetary policy - Supervision of credit institutions - Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering - Corrective measures - No invitation to act - Lack of precision in the application - Act not open to challenge - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 144/60)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicants: Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda (Lisbon, Portugal), Julião Maria Gomes de Azevedo (Lisbon), Paulo Eduardo Matos Gomes de Azevedo (Lisbon), Isabel Maria Matos Gomes de Azevedo (Lisbon) (represented by: M. Ribeiro, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: A. Karpf, P. Ferreira Jorge and K. Kaiser, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, an application based on Article 265 TFEU and seeking a declaration that the ECB illegally failed to take action against Portuguese credit institutions within the context of the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering, secondly, an application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the act by which the ECB returned to the applicants the invitation to act which they had sent to it, and, thirdly, an application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicants as a result of that failure to act.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Comprojecto — Projectos e Construções, Lda, Julião Maria Gomes de Azevedo, Paulo Eduardo Matos Gomes de Azevedo and Isabel Maria Matos Gomes de Azevedo shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 239/72

Order of the General Court of 24 April 2017 — Ipuri v EUIPO — van Graaf (IPURI)

(Case T-226/16) (1)

(2017/C 239/84)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/27

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2017 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-60/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - EIB staff - Appraisal - Career evaluation report - Appraisal year 2011 - Errors of law - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2017/C 221/38)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: initially by: G. Nuvoli and F. Martin, and subsequently by: G. Nuvoli and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015, De Nicola v EIB (F-55/13, EU:F:2015:165) seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal.

(1) OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/19

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2017 — L'Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot (MASTER PRECISE)

(Case T-181/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MASTER PRECISE - Prior national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly unfounded in law - Article 126 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2017/C 269/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: L'Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Guinot (Paris) (represented by: A. Sion, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 (Case R 2911/2014-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Guinot and L’Oréal.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. L’Oréal shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/21

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2017 — CSL Behring v EUIPO — Vivatrex (Vivatrex)

(Case T-346/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Vivatrex - Revocation of the earlier EU trade mark - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 269/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CSL Behring AG (Berne, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Best, U. Pfleghar and S. Schäffner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Vivatrex GmbH (Aachen, Germany) (represented by: F. Stangl, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2016 (Joined Cases R 1263/2015-4 and R 1221/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between CSL Behring and Vivatrex.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 357/32

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2017 — Papathanasiou v EUIPO

(Case T-549/16) (1)

(2017/C 357/42)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 221, 6.7.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-64/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).