ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 251/32

Order of the General Court of 27 April 2016 — European Union Copper Task Force v Commission

(Case T-310/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Plant-protection products - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 - Establishment of a list of candidates for substitution - Inclusion of copper compounds on that list - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory measure comprising implementing measures - Inadmissible))

(2016/C 251/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Union Copper Task Force (Essex, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Fernández Vicién and I. Moreno-Tapia Rivas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and establishing a list of candidates for substitution (OJ 2015 L 67, p. 18).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Parliament and the Council.

3. European Union Copper Task Force is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/22

Order of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — CBM v OHIM — ÏD Group (Fashion ID)

(Case T-536/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 200/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken and J. Bärenfänger, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: ÏD Group (Roubaix, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2015 (Case R 2472/2014-4), concerning opposition proceedings between ÏD Group and CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

(1) OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/27

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 July 2016 — PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v EMA

(Case T-718/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the EMA concerning information submitted by an undertaking as part of its application for authorisation to place a medicinal product on the market - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Prima facie case - Weighing up of interests))

(2016/C 326/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PTC Therapeutics International Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: G. Castle, B. Kelly, H. Billson, Solicitors, M. Demetriou, QC, and C. Thomas, Barrister)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: T. Jabłoński, A. Spina, A. Rusanov, S. Marino and N. Rampal Olmedo, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: European Confederation of Pharmaceutical Entrepreneurs (Eucope) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Cowlishaw, Solicitor, and D. Scannell, Barrister)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU for, in essence, the suspension of operation of Decision EMA/722323/2015 of the EMA of 25 November 2015, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to certain documents containing information submitted in the context of an application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Translarna.

Operative part of the order

1. The operation of Decision EMA/722323/2015 of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) of 25 November 2015, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, access to Clinical Study Report ‘Ataluren (PTC124) PTC124-GD-007-DMD’ on a Phase 2B efficacy and safety study of Ataluren in subjects with nonsense-mutation-mediated Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy, is suspended.

2. The EMA shall not disclose the report referred to in point 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/41

Order of the General Court of 25 May 2016 — Bergbräu v EUIPO — Vilser Privatbrauerei (VILSER BERGBRÄU)

(Case T-697/15) (1)

(2016/C 279/57)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/36

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Drex Technologies v Council

(Case T-710/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/63)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/34

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Drex Technologies v Council

(Case T-467/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/53)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/56

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — ICA Laboratories and Others v Commission

(Case T-732/15) (1)

(2017/C 006/71)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 419/45

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — Aston Martin Lagonda v EUIPO (Representation of a grille on the front of a car)

(Case T-73/15) (1)

((European Union trade mark - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 419/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd (Gaydon, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 December 2014 (Case R 1796/2014-2) relating to the applicant’s Community trade mark application

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/19

Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Frank v Commission

(Case T-603/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation - Calls for proposals and related activities under the ERC Work Programme 2015 - Decision of the ERCEA declaring the proposal submitted by the applicant ineligible - Implied decision of the Commission rejecting the administrative appeal relating to the decision of the ERCEA - Incorrect designation of the defendant - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 178/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Regine Frank (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: initially W. Trautner, subsequently by E. Niitväli and M. Reysen, then by E. Niitväli, M. Reysen and S. Wachs, and finally S. Conrad, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and B. Conte, acting as agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) of 5 June 2015 relating, in the context of the ‘ERC starting grant’ programme, to proposal No 680151 of the applicant — which was not given a positive evaluation during step 1 and was not admitted to step 2 of the evaluation — and the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s administrative appeal pursuant to Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (OJ 2003 L 11, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Ms Regine Frank and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/61

Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission

(Case T-174/15) (1)

(2017/C 144/90)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.
Order of the General Court of 28 June 2018 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-147/15) (1)

((Actions for annulment - European Union’s own resources - Financial responsibility of the Member States - Application to be exempted from making available own resources - Letter from the Commission - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 301/41)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller, J. Vláčil and J. Očková, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and Z. Malůšková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision allegedly made by the director of the directorate ‘Own resources and financial programming’ of the Directorate-General for Budget of the Commission contained in the letter with reference Ares (2015) 217973 of 20 January 2015 by which the latter dismissed the application to be exempted from making available own resources in an amount of CZK 53 976 340 submitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 implementing Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom on the system of the Communities’ own resources (OJ 2000 L 130, p. 1), and requested the Czech authorities to take the necessary measures to credit the Commission’s account with the amount of CZK 53 976 340, at the latest on the first working day following the nineteenth day of the second month following the dispatch of the letter concerned, at the risk of having to pay default interest pursuant to Article 11 of that regulation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to rule on the Slovak Republic’s application to intervene.

3. The Czech Republic shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 213, 29.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 392/40

Order of the General Court of 18 September 2017 — Volfas Engelman v EUIPO — Rauch Fruchstäfte (BRAVORO PINTA)

(Case T-700/15) (1)

(2017/C 392/49)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.
Order of the General Court of 22 February 2022 — Brinkmann (Steel Trading) and Others v Commission and ECB

(Case T-161/15) (1)

(Action for damages - Economic and monetary policy - Stability support programme for Cyprus - Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Equal treatment - Principle of proportionality - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 171/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Brinkmann (Steel Trading) Ltd (London, United Kingdom) and the 18 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the order (represented by: R. Nowinski, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne, M. Konstantinidis and S. Delaude, acting as Agents), European Central Bank (represented by: K. Laurinavičius and M. Szablewska, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the decision of the Commission and the ECB to subject to certain conditions the grant of a financial assistance facility to the Republic of Cyprus.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Brinkmann (Steel Trading) Ltd and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.
Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Aurubis and Others v Commission

(Case T-738/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Aurubis AG (Hamburg, Germany) and the other 7 applicants whose names are annexed to the order (represented by: C. Arhold and N. Wimmer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Aurubis AG and those of the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/26

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 April 2016 — Le Pen v Parliament

(Case T-140/16 R)

((Interim measures - Member of the European Parliament - Recovery of allowances paid by way of reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2016/C 200/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-Marie Le Pen (Saint-Cloud, France) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi and J.-P. Le Moigne, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: G. Corstens and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking the suspension of the operation of the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 29 January 2016 ordering the recovery from the applicant of a sum of 320 026,23 euros, and of debit note No 2016-195 of 4 February 2016 adopted pursuant to that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 14/34

Order of the General Court of 12 October 2016 — Cyprus Turkish Chamber of Industry and Others v Commission

(Case T-41/16) (1)

((Actions for annulment - Application for registration of a protected designation of origin ‘Halloumi’ or ‘Hellim’ - Commission letters concerning the applicants’ involvement in the opposition proceedings relating to the registration procedure - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 014/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Cyprus Turkish Chamber of Industry (Nicosia, Cyprus), Animal Breeders and Producers Association (Nicosia), Milk and Oil Products Production and Marketing Cooperative Ltd (Nicosia), Süt Urünleri İmalatçulari Birliği Milk Processors Association (Nicosia), Fatma Garanti (Güzelyurt)) (represented by: B. O’Connor, Solicitor, S. Gubel and E. Bertolotto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis, P. Aalto and J. Guillem Carrau, Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of two letters from the European Commission of 18 November 2015 (Ref.Ares (2015) 5171539) and of 15 January 2016 (Ref.Ares (2016) 220922) concerning the applicants’ involvement in the opposition procedure relating to the procedure for registering the cheese called ‘Halloumi/Hellim’ as a protected designation of origin

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union, the European Parliament and the Republic of Cyprus.

3. Cyprus Turkish Chamber of Industry, Animal Breeders and Producers Association, Milk and Oil Products Production and Marketing Cooperative Ltd, Süt Urünleri İmalatçulari Birliği Milk Processors Association and Mrs Fatma Garanti shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

4. Cyprus Turkish Chamber of Industry, Animal Breeders and Producers Association, Milk and Oil Products Production and Marketing Cooperative Ltd, Süt Urünleri İmalatçulari Birliği Milk Processors Association, Mrs Fatma Garanti, the Commission, the Council, the Parliament and the Republic of Cyprus shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/36

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2016 — Skechers USA France v EUIPO — IM Production (Shoes)

(Case T-9/16) (1)

(2016/C 410/66)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/43

Order of the General Court of 19 January 2017 — Grupo Riberebro Integral and Riberebro Integral v Commission

(Case T-313/16) (1)

(2017/C 078/61)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 287, 8.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/60

Order of the General Court of 21 November 2016 — TBWA\London v EUIPO (MEDIA ARTS LAB)

(Case T-361/16) (1)

(2017/C 022/82)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 121/32

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2017 — NM v European Council

(Case T-257/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - EU-Turkey statement of 18 March 2016 - Press release - Concept of ‘international agreement’ - Identification of the author of the act - Scope of the act - Meeting of the European Council - Meeting of the Heads of State or Government of the Member States of the European Union held on the premises of the Council of the European Union - Capacity of the representatives of the Member States of the European Union during a meeting with the representative of a third country - First paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Lack of jurisdiction))

(2017/C 121/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: NM (represented by: B. Burns, Solicitor, P. O’Shea and I. Whelan, Barristers)

Defendant: European Council (represented by: K. Pleśniak, Á. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado and S. Boelaert, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of an alleged agreement concluded between the European Council and the Republic of Turkey dated 18 March 2016 and entitled ‘EU-Turkey statement, 18 March 2016’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed on the ground of the Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear and determine it.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of Belgium, the Hellenic Republic and the European Commission.

3. NM and the European Council shall bear their own costs.

4. The Kingdom of Belgium, the Hellenic Republic and the Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/50

Order of the General Court of 3 February 2017 — Bank Saderat Iran v Council

(Case T-349/16) (1)

(2017/C 112/69)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/20

Order of the General Court of 20 March 2017 — Kohrener Landmolkerei and DHG v Commission

(Case T-199/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - System of traditional specialities guaranteed - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/304 - Time-limit for the forwarding of the notice of opposition to the Commission by the competent authorities - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 178/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH (Penig, Germany) and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH (Frohburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially D. Triantafyllou, J. Guillem Carrau and J. Herkommer, and subsequently D. Triantafyllou and J. Herkommer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/304 of 2 March 2016 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Heumilch/Haymilk/Latte fieno/Lait de foin/Leche de heno (TSG)) (OJ 2016 L 58, p. 28).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/46

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 March 2017 — Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA

(Case T-625/16 R)

((Interim measures - European Chemicals Agency - REACH - Fee payable for registration of a substance - Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises - Decision imposing an administrative charge and an additional fee - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 144/64)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej sp. z o.o. (Grajewo, Poland) (represented by: T. Dobrzyński, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: E. Maurage, J. Trnka and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the granting of interim measures (i) suspending implementation of Decision No SME (2016) 2851 of 23 June 2016 which found that the applicant was not entitled to the fee reductions applicable to medium-sized enterprises and (ii) ordering the defendant to cancel the invoices issued on the basis of that decision, namely ECHA invoices No 10058238 and No 10058239 of 23 June 2016.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.