ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/14

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Coimbra — Portugal) — Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL v Ministério Público, Carlos Manuel Prata Pereira Sá Meneses, Sandra Carla Ferreira Cardoso, Douros Bar Lda

(Case C-151/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Copyright and related rights in the information society - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 3(1) - Concept of ‘communication to the public’ - Broadcasting of works in a café-restaurant by means of a radio apparatus connected to loudspeakers))

(2015/C 320/20)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação de Coimbra

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores CRL

Defendants: Ministério Público, Carlos Manuel Prata Pereira Sá Meneses, Sandra Carla Ferreira Cardoso, Douros Bar Lda

Operative part of the order

The concept of ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that it covers the transmission, by operators of a café-restaurant, of musico-literary works broadcast by a radio broadcasting station, by means of a radio apparatus connected to loudspeakers and/or amplifiers, to the customers present in that establishment.

(1) OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/3

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA (C-53/15 P), Trefilerías Quijano SA, (C-54/15 P), Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC SL, (C-55/15 P), Global Steel Wire SA (C-56/15 P) v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-53/15 P to C-56/15 P) (1)

((Appeals - Competition - European prestressing steel market - Commission decision adjusting the amount of the fines imposed on certain undertakings and fixing a new period for the payment of those fines - Other undertakings whose fines remained unchanged having no interest in bringing proceedings - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Appeal manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 078/03)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellants: Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA (C-53/15 P), Trefilerías Quijano SA, (C-54/15 P), Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC SL, (C-55/15 P), Global Steel Wire SA (C-56/15 P) (represented by: F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Urraca Caviedes and F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

1. The appeals are dismissed.

2. Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías SA, Trefilerías Quijano SA, Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC SL and Global Steel Wire SA shall pay the costs of the proceedings in cases C-53/15 P, C-54/15 P, C-55/15 P and C-56/15 P respectively.

(1) OJ C 118, 13.4.2015
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/20

Order of the Court of 25 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Openbaar Ministerie v A.

(Case C-463/15 PPU) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary-ruling procedure - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - European arrest warrant - Article 2(4) and Article 4.1 - Conditions of execution - National criminal law making the execution of a European arrest warrant subject to, in addition to double criminality, the condition that the criminal act is punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least 12 months under the law of the executing Member State))

(2016/C 038/29)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie

Defendant: A.

Operative part of the order

Article 2(4) and Article 4.1 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as precluding a situation in which surrender pursuant to a European arrest warrant is subject, in the executing Member State, not only to the condition that the act for which the arrest warrant was issued constitutes an offence under the law of that Member State, but also to the condition that it is, under that same law, punishable by a custodial sentence of a maximum of at least twelve months.

(1) OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/4

Order of the Court of 23 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de les Illes Balears (Spain)) — Francisca Garzón Ramos, José Javier Ramos Martín v Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria SA, Intercotrans SL

(Case C-380/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to effective judicial protection - Mortgage enforcement proceedings - Powers of the national court hearing the case - Failure to implement EU law - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2016/C 200/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de les Illes Balears (Spain)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Francisca Garzón Ramos, José Javier Ramos Martín

Defendants: Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria SA, Intercotrans SL

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to reply to the questions submitted by the Audiencia Provincial de les Illes Balears (Provincial Court of the Balearic Islands, Spain) by decision of 1 July 2015.

(1) OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/3

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino — Italy) — Véronique Baudinet and Others v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino

(Case C-194/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Direct taxation - Imposition of dividends - Bilateral agreement on double taxation - Judicial double taxation))

(2016/C 136/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Véronique Baudinet, Adrien Boyer, Pauline Boyer, Edouard Boyer

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU, 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State, such as the legislation at issue in the main proceedings, under which, when a resident of that Member State, a shareholder in a company established in another Member State, receives from that company dividends taxed in both States, that double taxation is not remedied by the grant in the shareholder’s State of residence of a tax credit at least equal to the amount of tax paid in the State of the source of those dividends.

(1) OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/4

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 April 2016 — ultra air GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office, Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH

(Case C-232/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - EU trade mark - EU word mark ultra.air ultrafilter - Invalidity proceedings - Absolute ground for refusal or for invalidity - Descriptive character - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 52(1)(a) - Declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 279/05)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: ultra air GmbH (represented by: C. König, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent), Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH (represented by: N. Siebertz and M. Teworte-Vey, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. ultra air GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2015
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/8

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Leiria- Portugal) — Bernard Jean Marie Gabarel v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-555/15) (1)

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Exemptions - Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions - Physiotherapy - Osteopathy)

(2016/C 279/12)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Leiria

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bernard Jean Marie Gabarel

Defendant: Fazenda Pública

Operative part of the order

Article 132(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a physiotherapist who, in the context of his professional health activity, uses, either indistinctly or complementarily, both therapies characteristic of physiotherapy and therapies characteristic of osteopathy must be exempt from value added tax not only with regard to the former therapies, but also with regard to the latter, where the exclusion of the therapies characteristic of osteopathy from the exercise of paramedical professions for the purposes of an exemption from value added tax exceeds the scope of the discretion granted to Member States by that provision.

(1) OJ C 16, 18.1.2016
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 343/15

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission

(Case C-523/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European prestressing steel market - Fines - Appraisal of the ability to pay - The 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Unlimited jurisdiction - Taking into account facts subsequent to the contested decision - Principles of proportionality and equal treatment - Right to effective judicial protection))

(2016/C 343/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellants: Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: C. Stadler, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, H. Leupold and G. Meessen, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 389, 23.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/3

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2016 — Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK), Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Euroalliages

(Case C-345/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure - Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 60/2012 - Import of ferro-silicon originating, inter alia, in Russia - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 11(3) and (9) - Partial interim review))

(2016/C 326/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK), Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) (represented by: B. Evtimov, lawyer, and D. O’Keefe, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, S. Boelaert and E. McGovern, acting as Agents), European Commission, (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and M. França, acting as Agents), Euroalliages

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) are to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Commission is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 475/14

Order of the President of the Court of 23 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Oradea — Romania) — SC Vicdantrans SRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj Napoca prin Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bihor, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

(Case C-73/15) (1)

(2016/C 475/21)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.
Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Google Ireland Limited, Google Italy Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni

(Case C-322/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the question referred - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 454/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Google Ireland Limited, Google Italy Srl

Defendant: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni

Intervening parties: Filandolarete Srl, Associazione Confindustria Radio Televisioni, Federazione Italiana Editori Giornali (FIEG)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio (Regional Administrative Court for Lazio, Italy), by decision of 22 April 2015, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/28

Order of the President of the Court of 2 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Letrado de la Administración de Justicia del Juzgado de Violencia sobre la Mujer Único de Terrassa — Spain) — María Assumpció Martínez Roges v José Antonio García Sánchez

(Case C-609/15) (1)

(2017/C 283/39)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 63/6

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 — Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-575/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Word mark ZARA - Transport services - Genuine use - Revocation proceedings - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 51(1)(a) - Distortion of evidence - Rights of the defence))

(2017/C 063/09)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) (represented by: C. Duch Fonoll, abogada)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 8 July 2016 — European Commission v Romania

(Case C-62/16) (1)

(2016/C 454/36)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/4

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 8 de Madrid — Spain) — Francisco Rodrigo Sanz v Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

(Case C-443/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Successive fixed-term contracts in the public sector - Restructuring the organisation of universities - National rules - Integration of college lecturers into the body of university lecturers - Condition - Attainment of a doctorate degree - Changing full-time posts into part-time posts - Applied only to teachers employed as interim civil servants - Principle of non-discrimination))

(2017/C 129/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 8 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Francisco Rodrigo Sanz

Defendant: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Operative part of the order

Clause 4(1) of the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded on 18 March 1999, which is set out in the annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, in the context of measures restructuring the organisation of universities, authorises the competent authorities of the Member State concerned to reduce by half the working hours of college lecturers employed as interim civil servants on account of them not having a doctorate degree, whereas university lecturers employed as permanent civil servants who also do not have a doctorate degree are not subject to the same measure.

(1) OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 86/21

Order of the President of the Court of 30 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of: Prospector Offshore Drilling SA and Others v Her Majesty’s Treasury, Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

(Case C-72/16) (1)

(2017/C 086/25)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/12

Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 16 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vergabekammer Südbayern — Germany) — DUK Versorgungswerk e. V., Gothaer Pensionskasse AG v BG Klinik für Berufskrankheiten Bad Reichenhall gGmbH, in the presence of: Versorgungsanstalt des Bundes und der Länder, VBG Verwaltungs-Berufsgenossenschaft

(Case C-212/16) (1)

(2017/C 202/19)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/13

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 14 February 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — José Rui Garrett Pontes Pedroso v Netjets Management Limited

(Case C-242/16) (1)

(2017/C 129/20)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 300/27

Order of the President of the Court of 30 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Richard Rodriguez Serin v HOP!-Regional

(Case C-539/16) (1)

(2017/C 300/33)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 249/13

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 June 2017 — Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU v European Commission

(Case C-411/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Research projects financed by the European Union - Seventh Framework programme for research and technological development (2007-2013) - Project eDIGIREGION - Decision of the European Commission to refuse the applicant’s participation - Action for annulment and a declaration of liability))

(2017/C 249/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU (represented by: J.J. Marín López, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, acting as Agent, and J. Rivas Andrés, avocat)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 83/8

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 January 2018 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Amber Capital Italia Sgr SpA (C-654/16), Amber Capital Uk Llp (C-654/16), Bluebell Partners Limited (C-657/16), Elliot International LP (C-658/16), The Liverpool Limited Partnership (C-658/16), Elliot Associates LP (C-658/16) v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

(Joined Cases C-654/16, C-657/16 and C-658/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Company law - Directive 2004/25/EC - Takeover bids - Second subparagraph of Article 5(4) - Possibility of altering the price of the bid in specific circumstances and in line with clearly determined criteria - National legislation providing for the fixing of the price of the bid at the price ascertained in the event of collusion between the offeror or persons acting in concert with it and one or more sellers - Concept of ‘clearly determined criterion’))

(2018/C 083/10)

Language of the cases: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Amber Capital Italia Sgr SpA (C-654/16), Amber Capital Uk Llp (C-654/16), Bluebell Partners Limited (C-657/16), Elliot International LP (C-658/16), The Liverpool Limited Partnership (C-658/16), Elliot Associates LP (C-658/16)

Defendant: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

Interveners: Hitachi Rail Italy Investments Srl, Hitachi Rail Italy SpA, Ansaldo Sts SpA (C-654/16), Finmeccanica SpA

Operative part of the order

The second subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which allows the national supervisory authority to adjust upwards the price of a takeover bid in the event of collusion between the offeror or persons acting in concert with it and one or more sellers, by merely providing that, with regard to the price to which that takeover bid may thus be increased, that price is to correspond to the price ascertained by that authority, on condition that that price can be deduced in a sufficiently clear, precise and foreseeable manner from the body of national legislation, using methods of interpretation recognised by domestic law.

(1) OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/10

Order of the President of the Court of 17 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Stuttgart — Germany) — Staatsanwaltschaft Stuttgart v J. S. R

(Case C-2/16) (1)

(2018/C 013/12)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.