ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/16

Order of the General Court of 18 November 2013 — Trabelsi v Council

(Case T-162/12) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia - Extension of asset-freezing - Annulment of initial asset-freezing measures - No need to adjudicate)

2014/C 15/22

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mohamed Trabelsi (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Tekari, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Decision 2012/50/CFSP of 27 January 2012 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2012 L 27, p. 11), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 194/37

Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014 — Adler Mode v OHIM — Cluett, Peabody (Fairfield)

(Case T-139/12) (1)

2014/C 194/50

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/61

Order of the General Court of 20 February 2014 — USFSPEI and Loescher v Council

(Case T-119/12) (1)

2014/C 135/80

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/30

Order of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Alban Giacomo v Commission

(Case T-259/12) (1)

(2015/C 056/41)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/72

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2014 — LVM v Commission

(Case T-419/12) (1)

2014/C 315/119

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 373, 1.12.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 343/38

Order of the General Court of 18 July 2016 — Bank Mellat v Council

(Case T-72/12) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Annulment of the contested acts - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 343/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bank Mellat (Tehran (Iran)) (represented by: S. Zaiwalla, P. Reddy, F. Zaiwalla, Z. Burbeza, Solicitors, M. Brindle QC, and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and I. Rodios, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11), and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1), in so far as the applicant’s name was maintained on the list of persons and entities to whom those restrictive measures apply.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene made by Provincial Investment Companies Association, Saba Tamin Investment Company, Common Investment Fund (Pars Fund), Shirin Asal Food Industrial Group, Sorbon Industrial Production Group and Individual Stock Association.

3. Bank Mellat, the Council of the European Union, Provincial Investment Companies Association, Saba Tamin Investment Company, Common Investment Fund (Pars Fund), Shirin Asal Food Industrial Group, Sorbon Industrial Production Group and Individual Stock Association shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/11

Order of the General Court of 7 May 2015 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Adveo Group International (UNITED OFFICE)

(Case T-391/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 228/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Wolter and S. Paul, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch and S. Hanne, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Adveo Group International, SA, formerly Unipapel Industria, Comercio y Servicios, SL (Tres Cantos, Spain) (represented by: A. Tarí Lázaro, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 June 2012 (Case R 745/2011-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG and Adveo Group International, SA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The intervener shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 298/11

Order of the General Court of 14 August 2013 — Nordex Holding v OHIM — Fontana Food (Taverna)

(Case T-302/13) (1)

2013/C 298/21

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 189/25

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 April 2013 — InterMune UK and Others v EMA

(Case T-73/13 R)

(Application for interim measures - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the EMA containing information submitted by an undertaking as part of its application for authorisation to place a medicinal product on the market - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Prima facie case - Weighing up of interests)

2013/C 189/52

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: UK Ltd (London (United Kingdom)); InterMune, Inc. (Brisbane, California, United States); and InterMune International AG (Muttenz, Switzerland) (represented by: I. Dodds-Smith, A. Williams, Solicitors, T. de la Mare, QC and F. Campbell, Barrister)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: T. Jablonski, N. Rampal Olmedo and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, in essence, for suspension of operation of EMA Decision EMA/24685/2013 of 15 January 2013, granting a third party access to certain documents containing information submitted as part of an application for authorisation to place the medicinal product Esbriet on the market, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), inasmuch as that information is not yet within the public domain

Operative part of the order

1. The operation of EMA Decision EMA/24685/2013 of 15 January 2013, granting a third party access, under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, to the documents ‘2.4 Non-clinical Overview; 2.5 Clinical Overview; 2.6 Non-clinical Summary; and 2.7 Clinical Summary’, submitted as part of an application for authorisation to place the medicinal product Esbriet on the market, is suspended inasmuch as those documents contain information which is not yet publicly available.

2. The EMA is ordered not to disclose the documents referred to in point 1 of the operative part of this order in a version which is more detailed than the edited version of those documents as provided by InterMune UK Ltd, InterMune, Inc., and InterMune International AG to the EMA on 8 October 2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/17

Order of the General Court of 19 November 2013 — 1. garantovaná v Commission

(Case T-42/13) (1)

(Action for annulment - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom - Fines - Late-payment interest - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 15/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: 1. garantovaná a.s. (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented: initially by M. Powell, Solicitor, G. Forwood, Barrister, M. Staroň and P. Hodál, lawyers, and subsequently by K. Lasok QC, J. Holmes, B. Hartnett, Barristers, and O. Geiss, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, F. Dintilhac and N. von Lingen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 21 December 2012 (Case COMP/39.396 — Calcium carbide and magnesium based reagents for the steel and gas industries), whereby the Commission asked the applicant to pay the outstanding amount of the fine imposed by Commission decision C(2009) 5791 final of 22 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement, together with late-payment interest, or to provide the Commission with a bank guarantee covering that amount.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. 1. garantovaná a.s. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/14

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-226/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Action at first instance dismissed as manifestly devoid of any basis in law - Letter concerning compliance with a judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal sent to the appellant’s representative in the appeal brought against that judgment - Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)

2013/C 359/27

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 February 2013 in Case F-67/12 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking that that order be set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed;

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio will bear his own costs and will pay those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal.

3. Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay the General Court the sum of EUR 2 000 pursuant to Article 90 of the Rules of Procedure.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/12

Order of the General Court of 21 January 2014 — EPAW v Commission

(Case T-168/13) (1)

(Action for annulment - Legal person governed by private law - Absence of proof of existence in law - Article 44(5)(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Manifest inadmissibility)

2014/C 78/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Platform Against Windfarms (EPAW) (represented by: C. Kiss, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by K. Herrmann and P. Oliver, and subsequently by L. Pignatoro Nolin, K. Herrmann and J. Tomkin, Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the Communication of 6 June 2012 from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, entitled ‘Renewable Energy: a major player in the European energy market’, and of the Commission’s decision of 21 January 2013 rejecting as inadmissible the request made by the applicant for review by the Commission of that communication.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. In addition to bearing its own costs, the European Platform Against Windfarms (EPAW) shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/44

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2013 — Et Solar Industry and Others v Commission

(Case T-153/13) (1)

2014/C 45/80

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/52

Order of the General Court of 1 April 2014 — Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology v Commission

(Case T-146/13) (1)

2014/C 175/73

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27. 4. 2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 142/54

Order of the General Court of 10 February 2014 — Jinko Solar and Others v Parliament and Others

(Case T-142/13) (1)

2014/C 142/70

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/58

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica v Commission

(Case T-244/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/98

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti Ibérica, SL is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/22

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2014 — Unión de Almacenistas de Hierros de España v Commission

(Case T-419/13) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to two Spanish competition proceedings - Implied refusal of access - Explicit decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 202/28

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Unión de Almacenistas de Hierros de España (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Creus Carreras, A. Valiente Martin and C. Maldonado Márquez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implicit decision refusing to grant the applicant access to certain documents relating to correspondence exchanged between the Commission and the Comisión Nacional de la Competencia (CNC, Spanish national competition authority) with regard to two national proceedings initiated by the CNC.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and those of Unión de Almacenistas of Hierros de España.

4. The Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of Spain shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/62

Order of the General Court of 19 June 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-503/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Article 14 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal - Principle of the lawful judge - Dismissal of the action at first instance as manifestly inadmissible - Application filed by facsimile bearing a non-handwritten signature of the lawyer - Application filed by facsimile and original filed later not identical - Action brought out of time - Application seeking payment of a certain sum for a quarter of the costs incurred in the proceedings in Case F-56/09 - Appeal manifestly unfounded))

2014/C 315/103

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (single Judge) of 12 July 2013 in Case F-32/12 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published, seeking the setting aside of that order.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance.

(1) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/51

Order of the General Court of 5 June 2014 — Saf-Holland v OHIM (INTEGRAL)

(Case T-217/13) (1)

((Community trademark - Refusal of registration - Withdrawal of application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 315/86

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Saf-Holland GmbH (Bessenbach, Germany) (represented by: M.-C. Seiler, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and G. Schneider, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 January 2013 (Case R 2087/2011-1) concerning an application for registration of the word mark INTEGRAL as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/42

Order of the General Court of 10 September 2014 — Lomnici v Parliament

(Case T-650/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Petition addressed to the European Parliament concerning the new law on Slovak citizenship - Petition declared admissible - Decision to close the procedure - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 409/60

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Zoltán Lomnici (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Z. Lomnici, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Pospíšilová Padowska and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament of 17 October 2013 to declare Petition No 1298/2012 closed.

Operative part of the order

1. The European Parliament’s request for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate is rejected.

2. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Slovak Republic and Hungary.

4. Mr Zoltán Lomnici shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Parliament.

5. The Slovak Republic and Hungary shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 339/19

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV)

(Case T-721/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 339/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Directv Group, Inc. (El Segundo, United States) (represented by: F. Valentin, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Bolloré (Ergué Gabéric, France) (represented by: S. Legrand, lawyer)

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2013 (Case R 1961/2912-2) concerning cancellation proceedings between Bolloré and The Directv Group, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant shall bear its costs, including those incurred by the defendant and the other party to the proceedings.

(1) OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/22

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2014 — HTC Sweden v OHIM — Vermop Salmon (TWISTER)

(Case T-230/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of application for declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))

(2014/C 431/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: HTC Sweden AB (Söderköping, Sweden) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and D. Kipping, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Vermop Salmon GmbH (Gilching, Germany) (represented by: M. Ring and W. von der Osten-Sacken, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 January 2013 (joined cases R 1873/2011-1 and R 1881/2011-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Vermop Salmon GmbH and HTC Sweden AB.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 448/22

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Mallis et Malli v Commission and ECB

(Case T-327/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Cyprus stability support programme - Declaration of the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus - Erroneous identification of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility))

(2014/C 448/28)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Constantinos Mallis (Larnaca, Cyprus) and Elli Constantinou Malli (Larnaca, Cyprus) (represented by: E. Efstathiou, K. Efstathiou and K. Liasidou, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P. Keppenne and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, acting as Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the declaration of the Eurogroup of 25 March 2013 concerning, inter alia, the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Constantinos Mallis and Elli Constantinou Malli are ordered to pay, in addition to their own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.