ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 July 2018 — Apple Distribution International v Commission

(Case T-101/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Aid planned by Germany to fund film production and distribution - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - No individual concern - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 381/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Apple Distribution International (Cork, Ireland) (represented by: S. Schwiddessen, H. Lutz, N. Niejahr and A. Patsa, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Samnadda, G. Braun and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2042 of 1 September 2016 on the aid scheme SA.38418 — 2014/C (ex 2014/N) which Germany is planning to implement for the funding of film production and distribution (OJ 2016 L 314, p. 63).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications to intervene lodged by the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic and the Filmförderungsanstalt.

3. Apple Distribution International shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the applications to intervene.

4. Apple Distribution International, the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic and the Filmförderungsanstalt shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 June 2018 — Strabag Belgium v Parliament

(Case T-784/17 RII)

((Application for interim measures - Public works contracts - Order granting suspension of operation of the decision of the European Parliament rejecting the applicant’s tender and awarding five tenderers a framework contract involving general contractor works for Parliament buildings in Brussels - Application for variation - Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 301/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Strabag Belgium (Anvers, Belgium) (represented by: M. Schoups, K. Lemmens and M. Lahbib, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z. Nagy and B. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court for variation of the order of 18 January 2018, Strabag Belgium v Parliament (T-784/17 R, not published, under appeal, EU:T:2018:17).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for variation of the order of 18 January 2018, Strabag Belgium v Parliament (T-784/17 R, not published, under appeal, EU:T:2018:17) is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — RE v Commission

(Case T-257/17) (1)

(Action for annulment and damages - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - No need to adjudicate - Explicit refusal of access - Modification of the form of order - Article 86(4)(a) and (b) of the Rules of Procedure - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/90)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: RE (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of an implied decision of the European Commission rejecting the confirmatory application of the applicant of 20 January 2017 for access to documents and decision C(2017) 3718 final of the Secretary General of the Commission of 24 May 2017, in so far as it refuses access to a note concerning the applicant’s recruitment, and, second, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered as a result of the refusal of access to those documents and of the delay in examining the application for access to the said documents.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claim for annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission rejecting the confirmatory application of RE of 20 January 2017 for access to documents.

2. The action is dismissed for the remainder.

3. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.
Order of the General Court of 28 September 2018 — Motex v Commission

(Case T-713/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - State Aid - Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings which have employed persons with disabilities - Preliminary review procedure - Decisions allegedly taken by the Commission declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market - Concept of party concerned - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/98)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Motex Ipari és Szolgáltató Rehabilitációs Kft. (Motex Kft.) (Esztergom-Kertváros, Hungary) (represented by: L. Szabó, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions allegedly adopted by the Commission concerning the complaints SA.29432 — CP 290/2009 — Hungary — Aid for the employment of disabled workers that is alleged to be illegal due to the discriminatory nature of the legislation, and SA.45498 (FC/2016) — Complaint by OPS Újpest-lift Kft concerning State aid provided to undertakings which employed disabled workers between 2006 and 2012.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dimissed.

2. Motex Ipari és Szolgáltató Rehabilitációs Kft. (Motex Kft.) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 437, 18.12.2017.
Order of the General Court of 6 November 2018 — Fortischem v Parliament and Council

(Case T-560/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Environment - Regulation (EU) 2017/852 - Protection of human health and the environment - Prohibition on chlor-alkali production using mercury as an electrode - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 44/81)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fortischem a.s. (Nováky, Slovakia) (represented by: C. Arhold, P. Hodál and M. Staroň, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. McDowell, L. Darie and A. Tamás, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and J. Kneale, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of letter (d) in Annex III, Part I to Regulation (EU) 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on mercury, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008 (OJ 2017 L 137, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene made by the European Commission and the Kingdom of Sweden.

3. Fortischem a.s. is to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

4. Fortischem, the Council, the Parliament, the Commission and the Kingdom of Sweden are each to bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.
Order of the General Court of 6 November 2018 — Chioreanu v ERCEA

(Case T-717/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - ERCEA - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (Horizon 2020) - Decision rejecting an application for revision of an evaluation of the research proposal - Administrative action before the Commission - Dismissal of the administrative action - Mistaken designation of the defendant - Application for directions to be issued - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2019/C 44/84)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Nicolae Chioreanu (Oradea, Romania) (represented by: D.-C. Rusu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Research Council Executive Agency (represented by: F. Sgritta and M.E. Chacón Mohedano, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of (i) the decision of ERCEA of 23 March 2017 rejecting the application for revision of an evaluation of research proposal No 741797–NIP, ERC-2016–ADG ‘New and Innovative Powertrain — NIP’ and (ii) Commission Decision C(2017) 5190 final of 27 July 2017 dismissing the administrative action brought by the applicant under Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (OJ 2003 L 11, p. 1), and, second, application requesting the General Court to require ERCEA to revise the evaluation of the research proposal referred to above.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Mr Nicolae Chioreanu to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 February 2019 — Schokker v EASA

(Case T-817/17) (1)

(Civil service - Contract staff - AESA - Recruitment - Selection procedure - Inclusion of the applicant on the reserve list - Withdrawal of the offer of employment made to the applicant - Liability - No unlawful conduct by the EASA - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 131/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Boudewijn Schokker (Hoofddorp, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency (represented by: S. Rostren and F. Pavesi, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFUE for compensation for damage which the applicant claims to have suffered by reason of the blameworthy conduct of the EASA during the selection procedure for the recruitment of a member of the contract agent.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Boudewijn Schokker is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2018 — Kampete v Council

(Case T-140/17) (1)

(2019/C 54/50)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.
Order of the General Court of 13 November 2020 — UG v Commission

(Case T-571/17) (1)

(Civil service - Contract staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Termination with notice - Agreement on the quantified amount of compensation for damages - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 19/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: UG (represented by: M. Richard and P. Junqueira de Oliveira, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Radu Bouyon and B. Mongin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 17 October 2016 by which the Commission’s Office for ‘Infrastructures and Logistics in Luxembourg’ (OIL) terminated the applicant’s contract of employment on the basis of Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union with effect from 20 August 2017 and, second, to obtain compensation for the material damage that the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of that decision as well as for the non-material damage that she allegedly suffered as a result of the degrading treatment to which she was subjected as a result of her trade union activity and the taking of her parental leave

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the monetary compensation resulting from the decision of 17 October 2016 by which the European Commission’s Office for ‘Infrastructures and Logistics in Luxembourg’ (OIL) terminated UG’s employment contract.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay one-half of the costs of UG. UG shall bear one-half of her own costs.

(1) OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Beats Electronics (i.Beat jump)

(Case T-746/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate - Article 137 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Avoidable costs - Article 139(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court)

(2019/C 413/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: O. Spieker, M. Alber and A. Schönfleisch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by E. Markakis and D. Walicka, and subsequently by E. Markakis, A. Söder and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Beats Electronics LLC (Culver City, California, United States) (represented by: M. Petersenn, lawyer, and I. Fowler, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 September 2017 (Case R 2236/2016-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Beats Electronics and TrekStor.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action and the cross-claim.

2. TrekStor Ltd and Beats Electronics LLC shall bear their own respective costs and each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. TrekStor and Beats Electronics shall each pay to the Court the sum of EUR 2 500 under Article 139(a) of its Rules of Procedure.

(1) OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.
Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — PV v Commission

(Case T-224/18 R)

((Interim measures - Civil Service - Psychological harassment - Decisions taken by the Commission following dismissal - Disciplinary proceedings - Reassignment - Setting the salary at ‘zero’ - Application for interim measures - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Partial inadmissibility - No prima facie case - No urgency))

(2018/C 328/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PV (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, B. Mongin and R. Striani, acting as agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, on the one hand, the suspension of the operation of, first, disciplinary procedure CMS 13/087, second, disciplinary procedure CMS 17/025, third, the decision to reinstate the applicant, fourth, the decision to set the applicant’s salary at zero and, on the other hand, the adoption of an interim measure assigning the applicant to the staff association ‘Generation 2004’ or to another Directorate General of the Commission.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to give a ruling on the application to suspend the operation of disciplinary procedure CMS 13/087.

2. The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder.
Case T-228/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 17 May 2018 — Transtec v Commission (Interim measures — Public procurement — Framework contract for the provision of services to third countries benefiting from external aid — Application for interim measures — No urgency)

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 May 2018 — Transtec v Commission

(Case T-228/18 R)

‛(Interim measures — Public procurement — Framework contract for the provision of services to third countries benefiting from external aid — Application for interim measures — No urgency)’

Parties

Applicant: Transtec (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking, on the one hand, a suspension of the application of the decision of the European Commission of 26 March 2018 rejecting the tender of the applicant and awarding ten tenderers the contract relating to Lot No 3 of the ‘Framework contract for the implementation of external aid 2018 (FWC SIEA 2018) 2017/S 128-260026’, with reference EuropeAid/138778/DH/SER/Multi and, on the other, an order that the Commission provisionally include the applicant among the selected tenderers.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2018 — European Anglers Alliance v Council

(Case T-252/18) (1)

(2019/C 44/115)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 September 2018 — XG v Commission

(Case T-504/18 R)

((Interim measures - Refusal to grant access to the Commission’s premises - Application for interim measures - No interest in obtaining the interim measures sought))

(2018/C 399/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: XG (represented by: S. Kaisergruber and A. Burghelle-Vernet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Van Nuffel and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, suspension of the operation of the Commission’s decision of 2 July 2018 confirming its refusal to allow access to its premises and, secondly, an order that the Commission provisionally grant access to its premises.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGCPRO)

(Case T-523/18) (1)

(2019/C 65/66)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 392, 29.10.2018.
Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — JPMorgan Chase and Others v Commission

(Case T-420/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Competition - Euro Interbank Offered Rates (Euribor) - Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD) - Rejection of the request for confidential treatment of a decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Principle of the presumption of innocence - Application for interim measures - No prima facie case))

(2019/C 44/97)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: JPMorgan Chase & Co (New York, New York, United States), JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (Columbus, Ohio, United States), J. P. Morgan Services LLP (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Lester QC, D. Piccinin, D. Heaton, Barristers, B. Tormey, N. French, N. Frey and D. Das, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Farley, B. Mongin and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, a stay on the operation of Commission Decision C(2018) 2745 final of 27 April 2018, on objections to the disclosure of information by their publication raised by JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and J.P. Morgan Services, in accordance with Article 8 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (Case AT.39914 — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD)), and, second, an order requiring the Commission to refrain from publishing Commission Decision C(2016) 8530 final of 7 December 2016 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Case AT.39914 — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD)).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 11 July 2018, JPMorgan Chase and Others v Commission (T-420/18 R), is cancelled.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Hangzhou Lezoo traveling equipment v EUIPO — Promotional Traders

(GREEN HERMIT)

(Case T-60/18) (1)

(2019/C 131/68)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 January 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB

(Case T-687/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency))

(2019/C 103/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pilatus Bank plc (Ta’Xbiex, Malta) (represented by: O.H. Behrends, M. Kirchner and L. Feddern, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, M. Puidokas and A. Karpf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the operation of an act of the European Central Bank contained in an email of 10 September 2018 by which the ECB required that any communication to it by the applicant be made either through the person appointed by the Malta Financial Services Authority or with the approval of that person.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2019 — Intercontinental Exchange Holdings v EUIPO — New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX BRENT)

(Case T-760/18) (1)

(2019/C 148/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 March 2019 — Buck v EUIPO — Unger Holding (BUCK)

(Case T-311/18) (1)

(2019/C 155/68)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Order of the General Court of 6 May 2019 — Bernis and Others v ECB

(Case T-283/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Parent company and subsidiary - Declaration by the ECB that an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Preparatory measures - Acts not open to judicial review - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 230/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ernests Bernis (Jurmala, Latvia), Oļegs Fiļs (Jurmala), OF Holding SIA (Riga, Latvia), Cassandra Holding Company SIA (Jurmala) (represented by: O. Behrends, M. Kirchner and L. Feddern, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: G. Marafioti and E. Koupepidou, acting as Agents, and J. Rodríguez Cárcamo, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the European Central Bank’s decisions of 23 February 2018 by which the latter declared that ABLV Bank AS and its subsidiary, ABLV Bank Luxembourg SA, were failing or were likely to fail within the meaning of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Ernests Bernis, Mr Oļegs Fiļs, OF Holding SIA and Cassandra Holding Company SIA shall bear their own costs and pay those of the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — XK v Commission

(Case T-543/18) (1)

(2019/C 213/80)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.