ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — VIK v Commission

(Case T-576/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: VIK Verband der Industriellen Energie- und Kraftwirtschaft eV (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Kahle, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by VIK Verband der Industriellen Energie- und Kraftwirtschaft eV.

(1) OJ C 7, 11.1.2016
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2018 — Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych v Commission

(Case T-514/15) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Request for access to detailed opinions issued in the course of a notification procedure under Directive 98/34/EC - Documents relating to an infringement procedure - Refusal to grant access - Disclosure after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 328/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by P. Hoffman, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Falk, U. Persson, N. Otte Widgren, E. Karlsson and L. Swedenborg, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by B. Majczyna, M. Kamejsza-Kozłowska and B. Paziewska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission Decisions GESTDEM 2015/1291 of 12 June 2015 and of 17 July 2015 refusing to grant the applicant access to the detailed opinions delivered, respectively, by the Commission and the Republic of Malta in the course of notification procedure 2014/537/PL.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

3. The Kingdom of Sweden and the Republic of Poland shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 14/55

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2016 — Maubert v Council

(Case T-565/16) (1)

(2017/C 014/67)

Language of the case: French

The President of the General Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 27 of 25 January 2016 (Case originally registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-137/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/21

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Niculae and Others v Romania and Others

(Case T-256/16 R)

((Application for interim measures - Dismissal of the main action - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 410/30)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicants: Ioan Niculae (Bucharest, Romania) and the five other applicants, whose names are included in the Annex to the order (represented by: M. Vassii, lawyer)

Defendants: Romania, European Commission, Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) and Autoritatea naţională de reglementare în domeniul energiei (ANRE) (Romania).

Re:

Application for interim measures in the context of an action against Romania, the European Commission, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) and the Autoritatea naţională de reglementare în domeniul energiei (ANRE) (Romania).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/32

Order of the General Court of 26 January 2017 — European Social Enterprise Law Association v EUIPO (EUROPEAN SOCIAL ENTERPRISE LAW ASSOCIATION)

(Case T-353/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 078/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Social Enterprise Law Association (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Fletcher, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 April 2016 (Case R 2208/2015-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign EUROPEAN SOCIAL ENTERPRISE LAW ASSOCIATION as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The European Social Enterprise Law Association shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/60

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2016 — Trost Auto Service Technik v EUIPO (AUTOSERVICE.COM)

(Case T-259/16) (1)

(2017/C 022/80)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 121/31

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2017 — NG v European Council

(Case T-193/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - EU-Turkey statement of 18 March 2016 - Press release - Concept of ‘international agreement’ - Identification of the author of the act - Scope of the act - Meeting of the European Council - Meeting of the Heads of State or Government of the Member States of the European Union held on the premises of the Council of the European Union - Capacity of the representatives of the Member States of the European Union during a meeting with the representative of a third country - First paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Lack of jurisdiction))

(2017/C 121/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: NG (represented by: B. Burns, Solicitor, P. O’Shea and I. Whelan, Barristers)

Defendant: European Council (represented by: K. Pleśniak, Á. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado and S. Boelaert, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of an alleged agreement concluded between the European Council and the Republic of Turkey dated 18 March 2016 and entitled ‘EU-Turkey statement, 18 March 2016’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed on the ground of the Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear and determine it.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by NQ, NR, NS, NT, NU and NV, Amnesty International, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Hellenic Republic and the European Commission.

3. NG and the European Council shall bear their own costs.

4. NQ, NR, NS, NT, NU and NV, Amnesty International, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Hellenic Republic and the Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/50

Order of the General Court of 14 February 2017 — HP v Commission and eu-LISA

(Case T-596/16) (1)

(2017/C 112/70)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 296, 16.8.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-26/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/21

Order of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Brancheforeningen for Regulerkraft i Danmark v Commission

(Case T-203/16) (1)

((State aid - Complaint - Action for failure to act - Definition of Commission’s position terminating the failure to act - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/28)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Applicant: Brancheforeningen for Regulerkraft i Danmark (Ikast, Denmark) (represented by: N. Gade, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and S. Maaløe, acting as agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to comply with the time-limits relating to the duration of the preliminary examination procedure for State aid and, after the opening of the formal procedure, unlawfully failed to take a decision on the complaint, introduced by the applicant, relating to State aid.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Brancheforeningen for Regulerkraft i Danmark and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/62

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2017 — Cleversafe v EUIPO (Storage Beyond Scale)

(Case T-253/16) (1)

(2017/C 144/95)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 287, 8.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 231/23

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 May 2017 — Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v Commission

(Case T-207/16 R)

((Interim measures - Public contracts - Disclaimer notice - Screening opinion - Application for a stay of execution - Lack of urgency))

(2017/C 231/29)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TEFU seeking a stay of execution of the general exclusion decision concerning the applicant in the Early Warning System or in the Early Detection and Exclusion System.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/28

Order of the General Court of 2 May 2017 — Bermejo Garde v EESC

(Case T-511/16) (1)

(2017/C 202/45)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 184, 16.6.2014 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-23/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/35

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2017 — Casasnovas Bernad v Commission

(Case T-826/16) (1)

(2017/C 269/48)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 256/28

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2017 — Elevolution — Engenharia v Commission

(Case T-691/16) (1)

((EDF - Support programme for development in Mauritania - Contract for services entered into with Mauritania in the context of the implementation of that programme - Withdrawal of contested debit notes - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 256/34)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Elevolution — Engenharia SA (Amadora, Portugal) (represented by: A. Pinto Cardoso and L. Fuzeta da Ponte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and M. França, Agents)

Subject matter

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of the ‘decisions’ allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter and the three debit notes of 26 July 2016 concerning the repayment of various amounts with regard to a contract for services between the applicant and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the present case.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Elevolution — Engenharia SA.

(1) OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 338/14

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 August 2017 — Sigma Orionis v Commission

(Case T-48/16 R)

((Application for interim measures - Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community (2007-2013) and Horizon 2020 Framework Program for Research and Innovation - Decision to suspend payments and terminate grant contracts following a financial audit - Amounts allegedly due by the Commission in the context of the implementation of the grant contracts - Claim for damages - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency - Balancing of interests))

(2017/C 338/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sigma Orionis SA (Valbonne, France) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis and M. Siekierzyńska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU and asking for immediate payment by the Commission of various sums under several grant agreements and asking for suspension of the operation of the decision to terminate those agreements.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/50

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2017 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-666/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - EIB staff - Appraisal - Career development report - 2013 staff report - Application for annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee and of the decision not to promote the applicant - Psychological harassment - Claim for damages))

(2017/C 283/77)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 21 July 2016, De Nicola v EIB (F-100/15, EU:F:2016:167), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal.

(1) OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 5/52

Order of the General Court of 7 November 2017 — HO v EEAS

(Case T-595/16) (1)

(2018/C 005/70)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) C 251, 11.7.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-25/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 392/40

Order of the General Court of 19 September 2017 — Oil Pension Fund Investment Company v Council

(Case T-56/16) (1)

(2017/C 392/50)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 94/26

Order of the General Court of 15 January 2018 — ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe v ECHA

(Case T-762/16) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the ECHA - Request relating to documents and to the identity of an initial requestor of access to information of a registrant of substances under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Partial refusal of access - Withdrawal of the decision refusing access - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 094/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange SA (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg) and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG (Duisburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Scheidmann and M. Kottmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented: initially by M. Heikkilä, C. Buchanan and E. Maurage, and subsequently by M. Heikkilä, C. Buchanan and W. Broere, acting as Agents, and by G. Gilmore, Barrister)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Decision ATD/52/2016 of the ECHA of 26 September 2016, notified to the applicants on 28 September 2016, which granted partial access to the requested documents regarding an earlier application for access to documents held by the ECHA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

3. The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) shall, in addition to bearing its own costs, pay those incurred by ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange SA and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG.

4. The EMA shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 52/44

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — Meissen Keramik v EUIPO — Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen (Meissen)

(Case T-234/16) (1)

(2018/C 052/59)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.
Case T-230/16: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2018 — C & J Clark International v Commission

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2018 — C & J Clark International v Commission

(Case T-230/16) ( 1 )

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 161/51

Order of the General Court of 9 March 2018 — Aurora Group Danmark v EUIPO — Retail Distribution (PANZER)

(Case T-246/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 161/57)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Applicant: Aurora Group Danmark A/S (Ballerup, Denmark) (represented by: L. Elmgaard Sørensen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: initially, D. Gaja and, subsequently, T. Frydendahl and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Retail Distribution ApS (Hinnerup, Denmark) (represented by: E.A. Skovbo, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2016 (Case R 447/2015-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Retail Distribution and Aurora Group Danmark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Aurora Group Danmark A/S and Retail Distribution ApS shall bear their own respective costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 — Government of Gibraltar v Commission

(Case T-783/16) (1)

(2019/C 139/112)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.
Order of the General Court of 16 November 2018 — OT v Commission

(Case T-552/16) (1)

((Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Candidature submitted for the post of Director of the EMCDDA - Rejection of the candidature - Opinion of the CCA - Non-challengeable act - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2019/C 44/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: OT (represented by: D. Sobor, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Simonetti and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of ‘the [d]ecision of 26 September 2014 of [the Commission] refusing to accept the [a]pplicant’s candidature for the post of Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction’ (EMCDDA) and, secondly, compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm the applicant has allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. OT shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 383, 17.10.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-75/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 November 2021 — Bergallou v Council

(Case T-521/16) (1)

(Civil service - Contract staff - 2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations - Reimbursement of annual travel expenses and grant of travelling time - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 73/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Amal Bergallou (Lot, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Tavena and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, in substance, first, annulment of the decisions no longer to grant the applicant, as of 1 January 2014, travelling time and reimbursement of annual travel costs so that she may maintain a connection with her place of origin and, second, an order that the defendant pay damages in respect of the material and non-material harm that the applicant allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Amal Bergallou shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Parliament shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 431, 1.12.2014 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-98/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Director-General of OLAF v Commission

(Case T-251/16) (1)

(2020/C 390/68)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/23

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 March 2017 — Kibelisa v Council

(Case T-139/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures - Democratic Republic of the Congo - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 178/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Roger Kibelisa (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: O. Okito and A. Ouannès, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 of 12 December 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2016 L 336 I, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.