ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 152/23

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — Endesa and Endesa Generación v Commission

(Case T-490/10 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Compensation for the additional production costs of certain power plants arising from the public service obligation to produce certain volumes of electricity out of indigenous coal and implementation of a ‘preferential dispatch mechanism’ in their favour - Decision not to raise objections - Application for suspension of operation - Prima facie case - Lack of urgency - Weighing of the interests)

2011/C 152/42

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Endesa, SA (Madrid, Spain) and Endesa Generación, SA (Seville, Spain) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J.M. Rodríguez Cárcamo, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, in essence, an order for the suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2010) 4499 of 29 September 2010 relating to State aid No N 178/2010 notified by the Kingdom of Spain in the form of a public service compensation linked to a preferential dispatch mechanism in favour of electricity power plants which use indigenous coal

Operative part of the order

1. E.ON Generación, SL, Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico SA and the Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón are granted leave to intervene in support of the form of order sought by the European Commission.

2. The order of the President of the General Court of 3 November 2010 in Case T-490/10 R Endesa and Endesa Generación v Commission, not published in the ECR, is cancelled.

3. A period shall be fixed for Endesa, SA, Endesa Generación, SA, the Commission and the Kingdom of Spain to request that certain confidential information in the file and in the present order be excluded from communication to the parties referred to in point 1 of this operative part and to provide, for the purposes of that communication, a non-confidential version of the documents in the file and of the present order.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 113/14

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia v Commission

(Case T-520/10 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Compensation for additional production costs of certain electricity power plants arising from a public service obligation to produce certain volumes of electricity from indigenous coal implemented by a ‘preferential dispatch mechanism’ in their favour - Decision not to raise objections - Application for suspension of operation - Prima facie case - No urgency - Balance of interests)

2011/C 113/28

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia (Santiago de Compostela, Spain) (represented by: S. Martínez Lage, H. Brokelmann and A. Rincón García Loygorri, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, in essence, an order that the operation of Commission Decision C(2010) 4499 of 29 September 2010 concerning State aid N 178/2010 notified by the Kingdom of Spain in the form of a public service compensation linked to a preferential dispatch mechanism for indigenous coal power plants be suspended

Operative part of the order

1. Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, SA, and the Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón are granted leave to intervene in support of the form of order sought by the European Commission.

2. Copies of all the procedural documents shall be served by the Registrar on the parties referred to in paragraph 1 above.

3. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 219/17

Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2011 — DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital v Commission

(Case T-533/10 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Alteration of the funding scheme of the Spanish radio and television broadcasting organisation (RTVE) - Commission decision declaring the new funding scheme compatible with the internal market - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

2011/C 219/26

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: H. Brokelmann and M. Ganino, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Valero Jordana and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Parties intervening in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J. Rodríguez Cárcamo, abogado del Estado) and Corporación de Radio y Televisión Española, SA (RTVE) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by A. Martínez Sánchez, A. Vázquez-Guillén Fernández de la Riva and J. Rodríguez Ordóñez, lawyers)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision 2011/1/EU of 20 July 2010 on the State aid scheme C 38/09 (ex NN 58/09) which Spain is planning to implement for RTVE (OJ 2011 L 1, p. 9)

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/21

Order of the General Court of 21 July 2011 — Fuchshuber Agrarhandel v Commission

(Case T-451/10) (1)

(Action for damages - Common agricultural policy - Standing invitations to tender for the purchase of cereals on the Community market - Commission’s supervisory power - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Action obviously lacking any basis in law)

2011/C 282/43

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Fuchshuber Agrarhandel GmbH (Hörsching, Germany) (represented by: G. Lehner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen and D. Triantafyllou, Agents)

Re:

Action seeking compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant because of the lack of supervision, by the Commission, of the conditions for implementing standing invitations to tender for the purchase of cereals on the Community market, in this case maize held by the Hungarian intervention agency

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as obviously lacking any basis in law.

2. Fuchshuber Agrarhandel GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/49

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2011 — Emme v Commission

(Case T-422/10 R)

(Interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application to suspend the operation of a measure - Financial loss - No exceptional circumstances - No urgency)

2011/C 269/108

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Emme Holding SpA (Pescara, Italy) (represented by: G. Visconti, E. Vassallo di Castiglione, M. Siragusa, M. Beretta and P. Ferrari, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Gencarelli, V. Bottka and P. Manzini, Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing steel) and to dispense the applicant from the obligation to provide a bank guarantee so as to avoid immediate recovery of the fine imposed under Article 2 of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 340/22

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2011 — Land Wien v Commission

(Case T-267/10) (1)

(Nuclear power - Application initiating proceedings - Action for annulment - Decision of the Commission not to take any further action in respect of a complaint concerning the project for extension of blocks of a nuclear power plant - Action for a declaration of failure to act - Failure by the Commission to send all documents requested relevant to that project - Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 340/45

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Land Wien (Austria) (represented by: W.-G. Schärf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver, M. Patakia and G. Wilms, acting as Agents)

Re:

Firstly, in essence, annulment of the Commission decision of 25 March 2010 not to take any further action in respect of the applicant’s complaint concerning the project for extension of blocks 3 and 4 of the Mochovce nuclear power plant in Slovakia and, secondly, an action in respect of failure to act, within the meaning of Article 265 TFEU, since the Commission failed to grant the applicant full access to the documents requested relevant to that project, in breach of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The Land Wien is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 331/28

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Camara v Council

(Case T-295/10) (1)

2011/C 331/55

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/19

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2012 — Consorzio del vino nobile di Montepulciano and Others v Commission

(Case T-318/10) (1)

2012/C 184/38

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/21

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Truvo Belgium v OHIM — AOL (TRUVO and Truvo)

(Joined Cases T-528/10, T-69/11 and T-77/11) (1)

2012/C 39/40

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 30, 29.1.2011, OJ C 89, 19.3.2011 and OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/45

Order of the General Court of 23 November 2012 — Crocs v OHIM — Holey Soles Holdings and PHI (Representation of footwear )

(Case T-302/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Invalidity action - Withdrawal of the invalidity action - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 26/87

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Crocs, Inc. (Niwot, United States of America) (represented by: I.R. Craig, solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne, agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Holey Soles Holdings Ltd (Vancouver, Canada; and Partenaire Hospitalier International (La Haie Foissière, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2010 (Case R 9/2008-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Holey Shoes Holdings Ltd and Partenaire Hospitalier International and Crocs, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant shall bear it own costs and those incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 227/20

Order of the General Court of 12 June 2012 — Vesteda Groep v Commission

(Case T-206/10) (1)

(State aid - Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to social housing corporations - Existing aid - Decision accepting the commitments made by the Member State - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 227/31

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Vesteda Groep BV (Maastricht, Netherlands) (represented by: G. van der Wal and T. Boesman, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, S. Noë and S. Thomas, acting as Agents, assisted by H. Gilliams, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 — (Netherlands) — Existing and special project aid to housing corporations

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Vesteda Groep BV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/34

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2014 — FESI v Council

(Case T-134/10) (1)

((Action for annulment - Dumping - Extension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather coming from Macao - Association representing independent importers - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 135/42

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fédération européenne de l’industrie du sport (FESI) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Vermulst and Y. van Gerven, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, Agents, assisted by G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, Barrister, and subsequently by J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and M. França, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and the People’s Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (OJ 1996 L 352, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Fédération européenne de l’industrie du sport (FESI) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 114/34

Order of the General Court of 26 February 2013 — Castiglioni v Commission

(Case T-591/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Action for damages - Public works contracts - Tender procedure - Construction, restructuring and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure at the Joint Research Centre’s Ispra site - Selection criteria - Rejection of the tender submitted by one tenderer and a decision to award the contract to another tenderer - New pleas in law - Action in part manifestly unfounded in law and in part manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 114/56

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Castiglioni Srl (Busto Arsizio, Italy) (represented by: G. Turri, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by S. Delaude and N. Bambara, and subsequently by S. Delaude and F. Moro, Agents, and by D. Gullo, lawyer)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 29 October 2010 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in tendering procedure ISM/2010/C05/004/0C concerning a multiple framework agreement for works to construct, restructure and maintain buildings and infrastructure at the Commission’s Joint Research Centre’s Ispra site, of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer and of the contract notice and, second, an application for damages.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Castiglioni Srl is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 55, 19.2.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 369/18

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-116/10) (1)

((Action for annulment - ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - North Rhine-Westphalia Programme - Failure to comply with the time-limit for adopting a decision - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action manifestly well founded))

(2017/C 369/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by J. Möller, subsequently by J. Möller and T. Henze, acting as Agents, and U. Karpenstein, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann, B. Conte and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10675 of 23 December 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Objective 2 North Rhine-Westphalia Programme (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1120 of 7 May 1997.

Operative part of the order

1. Commission Decision C(2009) 10675 of 23 December 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Objective 2 North Rhine-Westphalia Programme (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1120 of 7 May 1997 is annulled.

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.
Order of the General Court of 25 November 2014 — Global Steel Wire v Commission

(Joined Cases T-429/10 and T-578/10 and Case T-438/12) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Competition - Cartels - European prestressing steel market - Price fixing, market sharing and exchange of sensitive commercial information - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Decision amending the initial decision without affecting the fines imposed on the applicant - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Partial manifest inadmissibility)

(2015/C 073/43)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Global Steel Wire, SA (Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain) (represented by: in Cases T-429/10 and T-578/10, F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, and, in Case T-438/12, initially F. González Díaz and P. Herrero Prieto, then F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and V. Bottka, and, in Case T-438/12, C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents, and by L. Ortiz Blanco, lawyer)

Re:

Applications for annulment and alteration of Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel), amended by Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 and by Commission Decision C (2011) 2269 final of 4 April 2011, and by the letter COMP/G2/DVE/nvz/79465 from the Commission’s Director-General for Competition of 25 July 2012.

Operative part of the order

1. In Case T-429/10, the form of order seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 amending Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel) is rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

2. In Case T-578/10, the action is rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

3. The remainder of the pleas in law and forms of order sought is reserved.

4. Global Steel Wire, SA is ordered to pay the costs relating to the pleas in law and forms of order directed against Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 amending Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel) made in Case T-429/10 and the costs in Case T-578/10.

(1) OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/24

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 July 2011 — Cementos Portland Valderrivas v Commission

(Case T-296/11 R)

(Interim relief - Competition - Request for information - Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 282/50

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Cementos Portland Valderrivas, SA (Pamplona, Spain) (represented by: L. Ortiz Blanco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, C. Urraca Caviedes and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents, and J. Rivas, lawyer)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2011) 2363 final of 30 March 2011 concerning a proceeding pursuant to Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39.520 — Cement and related products)

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 238/36

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2011 — Timab Industries and CFPR v Commission

(Case T-14/11) (1)

2011/C 238/65

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 355/19

Order of the President of the General Court of 14 October 2011 — Rousse Industry v European Commission

(Case T-489/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring aid to be incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation - Failure to have regard to formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 355/35

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: Rousse Industry (Rousse, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Angelov and S. Panov, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Urraca Caviedes and D. Stefanov, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2011) 4903 final of 13 July 2011 declaring incompatible with the internal market the aid granted by Bulgaria in favour of Rousse Industry in the form of rescheduling of debts owed to the State (State aid C 12/2010 and N 389/2009) in so far as that decision orders the recovery of that aid from the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/32

Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — GS v Parliament and Council

(Case T-149/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 - Right of the Member States to refuse the reimbursement of euro coins unfit for circulation - No direct concern - Inadmissible)

2011/C 347/55

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: GS Gesellschaft für Umwelt- und Energie-Serviceleistungen mbH (Eigeltingen, Germany) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: U. Rësslein and A. Neergaard, Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Monteiro and M. Simm, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the second sentence of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2010 concerning authentication of euro coins and handling of euro coins unfit for circulation (OJ 2010 L 339, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. GS Gesellschaft für Umwelt- und Energie-Serviceleistungen mbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and by the Council of the European Union.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the Kingdom of Spain’s application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 80/26

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Otto v OHIM — Nalsani (TOTTO)

(Case T-300/11) (1)

2012/C 80/46

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.