ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 July 2018 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Svilengrad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against Daniela Pinzaru, Robert-Andrei Cirstinoiu

(Case C-707/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Control of cash entering or leaving the European Union - Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 - Failure to comply with the obligation to declare - Penalties laid down by national law - Confiscation by the State of the undeclared sum - Custodial sentence - Fine in the amount of twice the undeclared sum - Proportionality))

(2018/C 341/02)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Rayonen sad Svilengrad

Parties to the criminal proceedings in the main proceedings

Daniela Pinzaru, Robert-Andrei Cirstinoiu

Operative part of the order

Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, as a penalty for failure to comply with the obligation to declare laid down in Article 3 of that regulation, imposes, first, confiscation by the State of the undeclared sum and, second, a custodial sentence of up to six years or a fine in the amount of twice the undeclared sum.

(1) OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 8 November 2018 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-678/17) (1)

(2019/C 54/23)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.
Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Pauline Stiernon and Others v Etat belge, SPF Santé publique, Communauté française de Belgique

(Case C-237/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom of movement for workers - Freedom to choose an occupation - Articles 20, 21 and 45 TFEU - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 15 - Profession of psychomotor therapist not included in the national list of allied health professions))

(2018/C 399/23)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Pauline Stiernon, Marion Goraguer, Muriel Buccarello, Clémentine Vasseur, Manon Pirotton, Anissa Quotb

Defendants: Etat belge, SPF Santé publique, Communauté française de Belgique

Operative part of the order

Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding, in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, legislation of a Member State establishing a list of allied health professions that does not include the profession of psychomotor therapist in that list, even though an undergraduate degree in psychomotor therapy has been established in that Member State.

(1) OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Napoli — Italy) — easyJet Airline Co. Ltd v Regione Campania

(Case C-241/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insufficient information regarding the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying why an answer to the questions referred is necessary - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 328/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Napoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd

Defendant: Regione Campania

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Napoli (Provincial Tax Court, Naples, Italy), by decision of 5 March 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2018 — Électricité de France (EDF) v European Commission, French Republic

(Case C-221/18 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - First decision of the European Commission - State aid measure incompatible with the internal market - Annulment by the General Court of the European Union - Confirmation by the Court of Justice of the European Union - Second decision of the Commission - State aid measure incompatible with the internal market - Dismissal of the application for annulment - Article 266 TFEU - Infringement of the principle of res judicata attaching to the first judgment of the General Court - Distortion of evidence - Failure of the General Court to have regard for the Commission’s obligations of diligent and impartial investigation - Failure to state reasons - Classification of the measure - New or existing aid))

(2019/C 103/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Électricité de France (EDF) (represented by: M. Debroux, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, B. Stromsky and D. Recchia, acting as Agents), French Republic

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Électricité de France (EDF) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 182, 28.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 26 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Logistik XXL GmbH v CMR Transport & Logistik, intervener: Rudolph Spedition und Logistik GmbH

(Case C-135/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/25)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.
1.

Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014, and in particular Articles 1 and 2c thereof, read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that actions against the decisions of contracting authorities to allow or exclude tenderers from participation in public procurement award procedures must be brought within 30 days from their communication to the parties concerned, failing which they will be time-barred, provided that decisions communicated contain a summary of the relevant reasons, ensuring that the persons concerned knew or ought to have known of the infringement of EU law alleged.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Austrian Airlines AG v MG, NF

(Case C-566/18) (1)

(2019/C 112/47)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 10 May 2019 — Apple Distribution International v European Commission, supported by: French Republic

(Case C-633/18 P) (1)

(2019/C 288/49)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
Order of the President of the Court of 11 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gliwicach, VIII Wydział Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych — Poland) — Lebopoll Logistics Sp. z o.o.w Sośnicowicach v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Zabrzu, in the presence of: NJ.

(C-437/18) (1)

(2019/C 280/47)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 21 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — JA v Skarb Państwa — Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Senat Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Prezes Rady Ministrów, Minister Sprawiedliwości and Minister Finansów

(Case C-745/18) (1)

(2020/C 10/37)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Pólus Vegas Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-665/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Games of chance - National taxes on the operation of slot machines in amusement arcades - National legislation increasing the amount of a tax five-fold and introducing an additional tax)

(2019/C 288/08)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pólus Vegas Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the order

Article 56 TFEU, read in the light of the judgment of 11 June 2015, Berlington Hungary and Others (C-98/14, EU:C:2015:386), must be interpreted as meaning, in so far as concerns the operation of slot machines in a Member State, a cross-border situation cannot be presumed to exist on the sole ground that EU citizens from other Member States may avail themselves of such gaming opportunities.

(1) OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.
Order of the Court of 19 December 2019 — OPS Újpesti Csökkentmunkaképességűek Ipari és Kereskemeldi Ktf. (OPS Újpest Kft.) v European Commission

(Case C-741/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State Aid - Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers - Action for annulment - Alleged decisions not to raise objections - Deadline for lodging an appeal - Starting point - Awareness of the existence of the contested measure - Request for translation of the contested measure - Reasonable time - Out of time - Inadmissibility of the action at first instance - Assessment of the facts - Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)

(2020/C 68/21)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Appellant: OPS Újpesti Csökkentmunkaképességűek Ipari és Kereskemeldi Ktf. (OPS Újpest Kft.) (represented by: L. Szabó, űgyvéd)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

2. OPS Újpesti Csökkentmunkaképességűek Ipari és Kereskemeldi Ktf. (OPS Újpest Kft.) is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 2 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Justice de paix du troisième canton de Charleroi — Belgium) — Giovanni Martina v Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd

(Case C-369/18) (1)

(2020/C 68/42)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Dresden — Germany) — hapeg dresden gmbh v Bayrische Straße 6-8 GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-137/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to provide services - Directive 2006/123/EC - Legislation of a Member State providing for a minimum tariff for the fees of engineers and architects)

(2020/C 313/02)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Dresden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: hapeg dresden gmbh

Defendant: Bayrische Straße 6-8 GmbH & Co. KG

Operative part of the order

Article 15(1)(2)(g) and (3) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which it is prohibited to agree, in contracts concluded with architects or engineers, tariffs lower than the minimum amounts determined in accordance with the rules on fees for architects and engineers laid down in that legislation.

(1) OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 21 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Sicilville Srl v Comune di Brescia, intervening party: Consorzio Stabile A.L.P.I. s.c.a.r.l.

(Case C-324/18) (1)

(2020/C 137/59)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.
Order of the President of the Court of 14 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Healthspan Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

(Case C-703/18) (1)

(2021/C 44/44)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 27 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance Epinal — France) — Cofidis v YP

(Case C-782/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/31)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 54, 11.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance de Nice — France) — VT, WU v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd

(Case C-395/19) (1)

(2020/C 45/34)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 12 June 2019 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava V — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against R.B.

(Case C-149/19) (1)

(2019/C 288/51)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 18 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart — Germany) — Eurowings GmbH v GD, HE, IF

(Case C-334/19) (1)

(2020/C 77/56)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — EX EX (C-140/19 and C-141/19), OK (C-492/19), PL (C-493/19), QM (C-494/19) v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld

(Joined Cases C-140/19, C-141/19 and C-492/19 to C-494/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to provide services - Posting of workers - Article 56 TFEU - Directive 2014/67/EU - Articles 9 and 20 - Reporting of workers - Retention of records of wages - Penalties - Proportionality - Fines of a predefined minimum amount - Cumulative - No upper limit - Court fees - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 68/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: EX EX (C-140/19 and C-141/19), OK (C-492/19), PL (C-493/19), QM (C-494/19)

Defendant: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld

Intervener: Finanzpolizei

Operative part of the order

Article 20 of Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which lays down, in the event of non-compliance with labour law obligations relating to the reporting of workers and the retention of records of wages, the imposition of high fines:

— which may not be lower than a predefined amount;

— which are imposed cumulatively in respect of each worker concerned and without an upper limit, and

— to which is added a contribution to court costs of 20 % of the amount of the fines if the appeal against the decision imposing those fines is dismissed.

(1) OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — Italian Republic v European Commission, French Republic, Hungary

(Case C-390/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) - European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) - Sugar sector - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic - Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)

(2020/C 287/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by C. Colelli and M.F. Severi, avvocatti dello Stato)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and B. Hofstötter, acting as Agents), French Republic, Hungary

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

2. The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě — Czech Republic) — Armostav Místek s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství

(Case C-520/19) (1)

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the question referred - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 137/35)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Krajský soud v Ostravě

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Armostav Místek s.r.o.

Defendant: Odvolací finanční ředitelství

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě (Ostrava Regional Court Czech Republic), by decision of 18 June 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 328 of 30.9.2019.
Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 20 January 2020 — Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission, Council of the European Union

(Case C-204/19 P) (1)

(2020/C 313/28)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Order of the Court of 10 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores — Portugal) — QE, RD v SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA

(Case C-766/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Manifest inadmissibility - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(3) - Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights - Scope - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ - Generalised malfunction in an airport’s refuelling system)

(2020/C 287/36)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: QE, RD

Defendant: SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA

Other party: ANA — Aeroportos de Portugal SA

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (District Court, Azores, Portugal), by decision of 8 July 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 14 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — B-GmbH v Finanzamt D

(Case C-797/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/46)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — GDVI Verbraucherhilfe GmbH v Swiss International Air Lines AG

(Case C-918/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/52)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 26 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (formerly Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság) — Hungary) — NJ v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság

(Case C-740/19) (1)

(2020/C 329/21)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 24 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — RQ v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real

(Case C-533/19) (1)

(2020/C 329/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 29 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta — Spain) — LL, MK v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA

(Case C-732/19) (1)

(2021/C 44/54)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Grand Chamber of the Court of 4 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra — Spain) — D.A.T.A., L.F.A., A.M.A.G., L.F.A., J.G.C., S.C.C., A.C.V., A.A.G., A.C.A., L.C.A., N.P.B., P.C.A. v Ryanair D.A.C.

(Case C-827/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/39)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Grand Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.