ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/4

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 — Emsibeth SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-251/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Community trade mark - Application for registration of the figurative mark Nael - Opposition by the proprietor of prior Community word mark Mc Neal - Refusal of registration - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Determination of the relevant public - Assessment of the comparison of the goods, the similarity of the signs and the likelihood of confusion))

(2016/C 136/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Emsibeth SpA (represented by: A. Arpaia, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Emsibeth SpA shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/24

Order of the President of the Court of 15 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Der Bundesbeauftragte für Asylangelegenheiten beim Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge v N, in the presence of: Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-150/15) (1)

(2016/C 279/32)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Grand Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/24

Order of the President of the Court of 2 May 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Feliks Frisman v Finnair Oyj

(Case C-533/15) (1)

(2016/C 279/35)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 343/13

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Italsempione — Spedizioni Internazionali SpA

(Case C-450/15) (1)

((Preliminary reference - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2)(a) - Interpretation in the light of the principle of proportionality - Determination of the amount of the fine - Criteria - Guidelines for the calculation of fines - National practice - Adjustment of the basic amount of the fine - Account to be taken of aggravating or extenuating circumstances - Application of the maximum limit of 10 % of total turnover - Absence of jurisdiction of the Court - Manifest lack of jurisdiction))

(2016/C 343/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato

Defendant: Italsempione — Spedizioni Internazionali SpA

Operative part of the order

The Court manifestly lacks jurisdiction to reply to the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy) by decision of 16 June 2015.

(1) OJ C 381, 16.11.2015
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 343/11

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2016 — Slovenská pošta a.s. v European Commission, Slovak Republic, Cromwell a.s, Slovak Mail Services a.s., Prvá Doručovacia a.s., ID Marketing Slovensko s.r.o. (formerly TNT Post Slovensko s.r.o.)

(Case C-293/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public undertakings - Amendment of Slovakian legislation on postal services - Exclusive rights granted to incumbent operator Slovenská pošta a.s. to provide ‘hybrid’ mail services - Decision declaring those provisions incompatible with Articles 86 EC and 82 EC))

(2016/C 343/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Slovenská pošta a.s. (represented by: O. Brouwer and A. Pliego Selie, advocaten)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou, R. Sauer and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents), Slovak Republic, (represented by: B. Ricziová, acting as Agent), Cromwell a.s., Slovak Mail Services a.s., Prvá Doručovacia a.s., ID Marketing Slovensko s.r.o. (formerly TNT Post Slovensko s.r.o.)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Slovenská pošta a.s. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Slovak Republic shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 475/15

Order of the President of the Court of 13 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Regione autonoma della Sardegna v Comune di Portoscuso, interveners: Saromar Gestioni Srl, Giulio Pistis

(Case C-449/15) (1)

(2016/C 475/24)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 July 2016 — Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office, Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH für Geschenkartikel & Co. KG

(Joined Cases C-363/15 P and C-364/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - European Union trade mark - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 454/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Louis Vuitton Malletier SA (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Bullock and D. Hanf, acting as Agents), Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH für Geschenkartikel & Co. KG (represented by: T. Boddien and A. Nordemann, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the appeals.

2. Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH für Geschenkartikel & Co. KG shall pay its own costs in Case C-363/15 P and Case C-364/15 P.

3. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in Case C-363/15 P and Case C-364/15 P.

(1) OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 300/27

Order of the President of the Court of 27 June 2017 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-683/15) (1)

(2017/C 300/32)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 63/7

Order of the Court of 10 November 2016 — Alain Laurent Brouillard v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case C-590/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public service contracts - Negotiated tender procedure for the conclusion of framework contracts for the translation of legal texts - Exclusion of a proposed subcontractor - Professional competence - Requirement of full legal training - Recognition of diplomas))

(2017/C 063/10)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Alain Laurent Brouillard (represented by: P. Vande Casteele, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Union (J. Inghelram and S. Chantre, agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Alain Laurent Brouillard is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 18 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln — Germany) — Elke Roch, Jürgen Roch v Germanwings GmbH

(Case C-257/16) (1)

(2016/C 454/39)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/20

Order of the President of the Court of 21 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Damien Zöldség, Gyümölcs Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

(Case C-114/16) (1)

(2016/C 326/37)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 86/3

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz v Belgian State

(Case C-345/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Legislative and factual background to the case in the main proceedings - Insufficient information - Manifestly inadmissible - Article 53(2) - Article 94 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure))

(2017/C 086/03)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz

Defendant: Belgian State

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgique) (Court of First Instance, Liège, Belgium) by decision of 9 June 2016 is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 63/9

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova, Italy) — Ignazio Messina & C. SpA v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti — Capitaneria di porto di Genova (C-10/16), Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio di Genova (C-11/16), Autorità portuale di Genova (C-12/16)

(Joined Cases C-10/16 to C-12/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Decision to refer - Insufficient information regarding the legal and factual context - Insufficient information regarding the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving a dispute in the main proceedings - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2017/C 063/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ignazio Messina & C. SpA

Defendants: Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti — Capitaneria di porto di Genova (C-10/16), Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio di Genova (C-11/16), Autorità portuale di Genova (C-12/16)

Operative part of the order

The requests for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova (Provincial Tax Court, Genoa, Italy), by decisions of 11 December 2015, are manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 161/17

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 10 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — Sociedade Metropolitana de Desenvolvimento SA v Banco Santander Totta SA

(Case C-136/16) (1)

(2017/C 161/23)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/13

Order of the President of the Court of 10 January 2017 — European Commission v Republic of Finland

(Case C-42/16) (1)

(2017/C 129/18)

Language of the case: Finnish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 249/13

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — SC Exmitiani SRL v Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice Cluj

(Case C-286/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Activity of passenger road transport services - Tax - Facts prior to the accession of Romania to the European Union - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2017/C 249/18)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Exmitiani SRL

Defendant: Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice Cluj

Re:

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Court of Appeal, Cluj, Romania).

(1) OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/13

Order of the President of the Court of 16 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Peter Roßnagel, Alexandre Schröter v TUIfly GmbH

(Case C-562/16) (1)

(2017/C 202/23)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.
1.

Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed, read in conjunction with Article 53 of Regulation No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety, must be interpreted as meaning that the European Commission is not required to adopt emergency measures within the meaning of Article 53 of Regulation No 178/2002 when a Member State officially informs the Commission, in accordance with Article 54(1) of that regulation, of the need to take such measures, as long as it is not evident that products authorised by Regulation No 1829/2003 or in accordance with that regulation are likely to constitute a serious risk to human health, animal health or the environment.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 374/24

Order of the President of the Court of 17 August 2017 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Protodikeio Rethymnis — Greece) — Criminal proceedings against K.

(Case C-475/16) (1)

(2017/C 374/35)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 428, 22.11.2016.
Case C-686/16 P: Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 8 May 2018 — Meissen Keramik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 8 May 2018 — Meissen Keramik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-686/16 P) ( 1 )

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 83/8

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2018 — Monster Energy Company v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-678/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Rules of Procedure - Article 181 - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘HotoGo self-heating can technology’ - Composite mark - Application for registration - Opposition - Rejection - Appeal manifestly inadmissible))

(2018/C 083/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Monster Energy Company (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Monster Energy Company shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/10

Order of the Court of 23 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Geocycle Bulgaria’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

(Case C-314/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Principles of fiscal neutrality and effectiveness - Reverse charge regime - Refusal to allow the recipient of an invoice to deduct input VAT - Decision of the tax authorities establishing a tax payable by the recipient of goods))

(2018/C 032/14)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘Geocycle Bulgaria’ EOOD

Defendant: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

Operative part of the order

The principles of fiscal neutrality and effectiveness of the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from refusing to allow the recipient of a supply to deduct input value added tax, where, with respect to the same transaction, value added tax is collected a first time from the provider of the goods or service, since he included it on the invoice he issued, then a second time from the purchaser, in situations in which national legislation does not provide for the possibility of adjusting the value added tax where there is a tax adjustment notice.

(1) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 424/16

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — Sportingbet PLC, Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd v Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa

(Case C-166/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Operation of games of chance via websites - National legislation providing for a State monopoly - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Question identical to a question on which the Court has already ruled or where the reply to such a question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law - Article 102 TFEU and Article 106(1) TFEU - Abuse of a dominant position - National legislation prohibiting advertising of games of chance except for those organised by a single operator subject to strict public-authority control which has been granted the exclusive right to organise such games - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Question manifestly inadmissible))

(2017/C 424/23)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal de Justiça

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Sportingbet PLC, Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd

Defendant: Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa

Operative part of the order

1. Article 56 TFEU does not preclude legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which prohibits operators established in other Member States from offering games of chance via a website, where it confers the exclusive right to operate such games on a single operator subject to strict public-authority control.

2. Article 56 TFEU does not preclude legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which prohibits advertising of games of chance except for games organised by a single operator which has been granted the exclusive right to organise those games.

3. The first, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth and tenth questions referred by the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Supreme Court, Portugal) are manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 202, 26.6.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/19

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 7 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Heinrich Denker v Gemeinde Thedinghausen, intervening party: Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

(Case C-206/17) (1)

(2018/C 190/30)

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 83/9

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 December 2017 — Verus Eood v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Maquet GmbH

(Case C-101/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark LUCEO - Declaration of invalidity))

(2018/C 083/12)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Verus Eood (represented by: C. Pfitzer, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent), Maquet GmbH (represented by: N. Hebeis, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the order

1) The appeal is dismissed.

2) Verus Eood shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.
Case C-371/17: Order of the President of the Court of 12 April 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Uber BV v Richard Leipold

Order of the President of the Court of 12 April 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Uber BV v Richard Leipold

(Case C-371/17) ( 1 )

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.
Case C-640/17: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 April 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Coimbra — Portugal) — Luís Manuel dos Santos v Fazenda Pública (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Internal taxation — Prohibition of discriminatory taxation — Article 110 TFEU — Uniform road tax for motor vehicles — Setting of tax rate according to the date of first registration of the vehicle in the taxing Member State — Second-hand motor vehicles imported from other Member States — No account taken of the date of first registration in another Member State)

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 April 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Coimbra — Portugal) — Luís Manuel dos Santos v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-640/17) ( 1 )

‛(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Internal taxation — Prohibition of discriminatory taxation — Article 110 TFEU — Uniform road tax for motor vehicles — Setting of tax rate according to the date of first registration of the vehicle in the taxing Member State — Second-hand motor vehicles imported from other Member States — No account taken of the date of first registration in another Member State)’

Referring court

Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Coimbra

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Luís Manuel dos Santos

Defendant: Fazenda Pública

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State pursuant to which the uniform road tax established by that legislation is levied on light passenger motor vehicles registered or listed in that Member State without taking into account the date of first registration of the vehicle where registration took place in another Member State, which results in higher taxation of vehicles imported from another Member State compared with similar non-imported vehicles.

( 1 ) OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 September 2018 — NF (C-208/17 P), NG (C-209/17 P), NM (C-210/17 P) v European Council

(Joined Cases C-208/17 P to C-210/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - EU-Turkey statement of the European Council of 18 March 2016 - Application for annulment))

(2018/C 399/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: NF (C-208/17 P), NG (C-209/17 P), NM (C-210/17 P) (represented by: P. O’Shea, Barrister-at-Law, I. Whelan, Barrister-at-Law, and B. Burns, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings: European Council (represented by: S. Boelaert, M. Chavrier and J.-P. Hix, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: M. Michelogiannaki and G. Karipsiadis, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeals are dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2. NF, NG and NM shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.