ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 298/7

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 August 2013 — France v Commission

(Case T-366/13 R)

(Interim relief - State aid - Aid implemented in favour of companies responsible for the public service of providing maritime transport services between Corsica and Marseille - Compensation paid in respect of additional services provided to cover peak periods during the tourist season - Decision classifying that aid as incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of that aid from the recipients - Application for stay of execution - No urgency)

2013/C 298/11

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: E. Belliard, N. Rouam, G. de Bergues and D. Colas, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for stay of execution of Decision C(2013) 1926 final of the European Commission of 2 May 2013 on State aid No SA.22843 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by France in favour of the Société nationale Corse Méditerranée and the Compagnie méridionale de navigation.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/82

Order of the President of the General Court of 5 June 2013 — Rubinum v Commission

(Case T-201/13 R)

(Interim relief - Authorisation of feed additives - Regulation on the suspension of the authorisations of the preparation of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2013/C 225/183

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Rubinum SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: C. Bittner and P.-C. Scheel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi, G. von Rintelen and B. Schima, agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 288/2013 of 25 March 2013 concerning the suspension of the authorisations of the preparation of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi (NCIMB 40112/CNCM I-1012) as provided for by Regulations (EC) No 256/2002, (EC) No 1453/2004, (EC) No 255/2005, (EC) No 1200/2005, (EC) No 166/2008 and (EC) No 378/2009 (OJ 2013 L 86, p. 15).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.

2. The Order of 15 April 2013 in Case T-201/13 R Rubinum v Commission is cancelled.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 24/21

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 November 2013 — Oikonomopoulos v Commission

(Case T-483/13 R)

(Interim relief - Investigation conducted by OLAF - Action for damages - Financial and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant - Application for interim measures - Inadmissibility - Lack of urgency)

2014/C 24/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Athanassios Oikonomopoulos (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and I. Zarzoura, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures lodged as part of an action for damages seeking compensation for the damage the applicant suffered in the course of his professional activities and regarding his reputation resulting from allegedly unlawful conduct of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) as part of an investigation conducted by its agents.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/15

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 October 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-461/13 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery and the cancellation of any outstanding payments - Application for suspension of operation - Failure to show a prima facie case and urgency)

2013/C 359/28

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, abogado del Estado)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2013) 3204 final of 19 June 2013 on State aid SA.28599 (C 23/2010) (ex NN 36/010, ex CP 163/2009) implemented by the Kingdom of Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less-urbanised areas (other than Castilla-La Mancha).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed;
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/34

Order of the General Court of 7 February 2014 — Pesquerias Riveirenses and Others v Council

(Case T-180/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Fisheries policy - Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 - Amalgamation of the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC - Lack of direct concern - Manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 112/45

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL (Ribeira, Spain); Pesquerias Campo de Marte, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Anpajo, SL (Ribeira); Arrastreros del Barbanza, SA (Ribeira); Martínez Pardavila e Hijos, SL (Ribeira); Lijo Pesca, SL (Ribeira); Frigoríficos Hermanos Vidal, SA (Ribeira); Pesquera Boteira, SL (Ribeira); Francisco Mariño Mos y Otros, CB (Ribeira); Pérez Vidal Juan Antonio y Hno, CB (Ribeira); Marina Nalda, SL (Ribeira); Portillo y Otros, SL (Ribeira); Vidiña Pesca, SL (Ribeira); Pesca Hermo, SL (Ribeira); Pescados Oubiña Pérez, SL (Ribeira); Manuel Pena Graña (Ribeira); Campo Eder, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Laga, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Jalisco, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Jopitos, SL (Ribeira); y Pesca-Julimar, SL (Ribeira) (represented by: J. Tojeiro Sierto, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Westerhof Löfflerová and A. de Gregorio Merino, acting as Agents)

Re:

ACTION for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and, to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international negotiations or agreements (OJ 2013 L 23, p. 54), as amended, in so far as it amalgamates the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC (total allowable catch) for blue whiting set out in Annexes IA and IB of that regulation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. The applicants, Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL, and others, are ordered to bear their own costs as well as those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/45

Order of the General Court of 25 November 2013 — Euromed v OHIM — DC Druck-Chemie (EUROSIL)

(Case T-524/13) (1)

2014/C 45/84

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/53

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — Lesaffre et Compagnie v OHIM — Louis Baking Company (BAKING CENTER BY TECHNOLINE)

(Case T-575/13) (1)

2014/C 175/75

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 31, 1. 2. 2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 151/19

Order of the General Court of 25 March 2014 — Hawe Hydraulik v OHIM — HaWi Energietechnik (HAWI)

(Case T-347/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 151/25

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hawe Hydraulik SE (Munich, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: HaWi Energietechnik AG (Eggenfelden, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 April 2013 (Case R 1690/2012-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Hawe Hydraulik SE and HaWi Energietechnik AG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs, and to pay the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/62

Order of the Court of 24 June 2014 — Léon Van Parys v Commission

(Case T-603/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Customs Union - Request by the Commission for supplementary information from the Belgian authorities - Letter seeking information from the applicant as regards the request - Challengeable act - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/104

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Firma Léon Van Parys (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: P. Vlaemminck, B. Van Vooren and R. Verbeke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros, B.-R. Killmann and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 16 September 2013, requesting supplementary information from the Belgian Administration of Customs and Excise, and the Commission’s letter of the same day informing the applicant of that request and the suspension of the treatment period pursuant to Article 907 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1) and, second; application for declaration that Article 909 of Regulation No 2454/93 has taken effect to the benefit of the applicant as a result of the judgment of 19 March 2013, Van Parys Firma v Commission (T-324/10, not yet published in the ECR).

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2) The applicant Firma Leon Van Parys is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 212/32

Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014 — Sharp v OHIM (BIG PAD)

(Case T-567/13) (1)

((Community trademark - Application for Community figurative mark BIG PAD - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive nature - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

2014/C 212/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sharp KK (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: G. Macias Bonilla, G. Marín Raigal, P. López Ronda and E. Armero, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, Agent)

Re:

Action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 August 2013 (Case R 2131/2012-2) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign BIG PAD as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Sharp KK is ordered to pay to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/13

Order of the General Court of 5 June 2014 — Stanleybet Malta and Stanley International Betting v Commission

(Case T-416/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Competition - Operation of video lottery terminals - Grant by Greece of an exclusive licence - Decision rejecting a complaint - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 329/16

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Stanleybet Malta Ltd (Valetta, Malta) and Stanley International Betting Ltd (Liverpool, United Kingdom) (represented by: R.A. Jacchia, I. Picciano, A. Terranova, F. Ferraro, G. Dellis, P. Kakouris and I. Koimitzoglou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Ronkes Agerbeek and R. Striani, acting as Agents, subsequently by F. Ronkes Agerbeek)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision contained in the letter of the Commission of 10 June 2013 by which it informed the applicants of its decision to reject their complaint and to close the file regarding Case COMP/39.981 — Stanleybet Group 2/OPAP.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications of the Hellenic Republic and of the Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou AE (OPAP) for leave to intervene.

3. Stanleybet Malta Ltd and Stanley International Betting Ltd shall bear their own costs and pay those borne by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/50

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Group’Hygiène v Commission

(Case T-202/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Professional association - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/85

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Group’Hygiène (Paris, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Sphère France SAS and of Schweitzer SAS.

3. Group’Hygiène is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/43

Order of the General Court of 18 September 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-699/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Application at first instance dismissed as manifestly inadmissible - Application lodged by fax and the original subsequently received not the same - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Action lodged out of time - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

2014/C 409/62

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 17 October 2013 in Case F-145/12 Marcuccio v Commission ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:162, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

3. Mr Marcuccio is ordered to refund to the General Court the sum of EUR 2 000 pursuant to Article 90 of its Rules of Procedure.

(1) OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 361/30

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — AbbVie v EMA

(Case T-44/13) (1)

2014/C 361/45

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/46

Order of the General Court of 1 October 2014 — Tui Deutschland v OHIM — Infinity Real Estate & Project Development (Sensimar)

(Case T-706/13) (1)

(2014/C 431/72)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 448/25

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Christodoulou and Stavrinou v Commission and ECB

(Case T-332/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Support programme for stability in Cyprus - Statement by the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus - Incorrect designation of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility))

(2014/C 448/33)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Chrisanthi Christodoulou (Paphos, Cyprus) and Maria Stavrinou (Larnaka, Cyprus) (represented by: E. Efstathiou, K. Efstathiou and K. Liasidou, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P. Keppene, M. Konstantinidis, Agents) and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, Agents, and W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the statement of the Eurogroup of 25 March 2013 concerning, inter alia, the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mrs Chrisanthi Christodoulou and Mrs Maria Stavrinou are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/25

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2015 — NICO v Council

(Case T-6/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Iran - Freezing of funds - Time-limit in which to bring proceedings - Starting point - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 089/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl (Pully, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Grayston, Solicitor, G. Pandey, P. Gjørtler, D. Rovetta, D. Sellers and N. Pilkington, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and I. Rodios, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 58), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 of 15 October 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 16), in so far as the applicant’s name is included in the list of persons and entities to whom those restrictive measures apply.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/29

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2014 — Eleftheriou and Papachirstofi v Commission and ECB

(Case T-291/13) (1)

((Action for annulment and compensation - Stability support programme for Cyprus - Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the ESM - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Causal link - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 026/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Andreas Eleftheriou (Dherynia, Cyprus); Eleni Eleftheriou (Dherynia); and Lilia Papachirstofi (Dherynia) (represented by: C. Paschalides, Solicitor, and A. Paschalides, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders and J.-P. Keppenne, Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

First, application for annulment of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 of the Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) on 26 April 2013, and, second, for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the inclusion of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 in the Memorandum of Understanding and an infringement of the Commission’s supervisory obligation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Andreas Eleftheriou, Ms Eleni Eleftheriou and Ms Lilia Papachristofi shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/25

Order of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission

(Case T-8/13) (1)

(2015/C 228/32)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 138/67

Order of the General Court of 2 March 2015 — Watch TV v Council

(Case T-639/13) (1)

(2015/C 138/86)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 48/87

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2015 — Aer Lingus v Commission

(Case T-101/13) (1)

(2016/C 048/96)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/57

Order of the General Court of 28 August 2015 — Bimbo v OHIM — Kimbo (Caffè KIMBO)

(Case T-637/13) (1)

(2015/C 381/69)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 19 September 2018 — Roeckl Sporthandschuhe v EUIPO — Roeckl Handschuhe & Accessoires (representation of a hand)

(Case T-537/13) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2018/C 427/86)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Roeckl Sporthandschuhe GmbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: O. Baumann, C. Straßberger and F. Römisch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Roeckl Handschuhe & Accessoires GmbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, J. Springer, A. Wagner and S. Brandstätter, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 July 2013 (Case R 1866/2012-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Roeckl Sporthandschuhe and Roeckl Handschuhe & Accessoires.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Roeckl Sporthandschuhe GmbH & Co. KG and Roeckl Handschuhe & Accessoires GmbH & Co. KG are ordered to bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.