ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 9/37

Order of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Saobraćajni institut CIP v Commission

(Case T-219/12) (1)

(Action for annulment and damages - Public service contracts - Exclusion of the applicant from the tendering procedure - Annulment of the tendering procedure after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 9/66

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Saobraćajni institut CIP d.o.o. (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: A. Lojpur, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and E. Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for, first, annulment of a contract notice published on 27 March 2012 concerning the preparation of technical documentation for a rail modernisation project, excluding the applicant from participating in the tendering procedure, and, second, damages.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the applicant in these proceedings.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 366/40

Order of the General Court of 3 October 2012 — 3M Pumps v OHIM — 3M (3M Pumps)

(Case T-25/12) (1)

2012/C 366/81

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/27

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Vardar v OHIM — Joker (pingulina)

(Case T-32/12) (1)

2013/C 38/49

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/25

Order of the General Court of 3 December 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-464/12 P (R)) (1)

(Appeal - Order made at first instance in interim proceedings rejecting an application for suspension of operation of the contested decision - Commission’s refusal to reimburse the appellant in respect of sums which he claims were unjustly deducted from his allowance)

2013/C 38/44

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Re:

Appeal seeking the setting aside of the order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 3 August 2012 in Case F-57/12 R Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs are reserved.

(1) OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 189/29

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou v Commission

(Case T-498/12) (1)

2013/C 189/61

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 141/19

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 March 2013 — North Drilling v Council

(Case T-552/12 R)

(Interim relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2013/C 141/33

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: North Drilling Co. (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: J. Viñals Camallonga, L. Barriola Urruticoechea and J. Iriarte Ángel, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and A. De Elera, Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay in the enforcement, first, of Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 58), in so far as the applicant’s name was entered in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39), and, secondly, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 of 15 October 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 16), in so far as that regulation concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/24

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2013 — Conticchio v Commission

(Case T-358/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Decision concerning the calculation of pension rights - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2013/C 336/50

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Rosella Conticchio (Rome, Italy) (represented by: R. Giuffrida and A. Tortora, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 July 2012 in Case F-22/11 Conticchio v Commission ECR-SC I-A-0000 and II-0000, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/79

Order of the General Court of 17 June 2013 — Zavvar v Council

(Case T-69/12) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Removal of the persons concerned from the list - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 225/175

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Seyed Hadi Zavvar (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: S. Zaiwalla, P. Reddy and F. Zaiwalla, Solicitors, D. Wyatt QC, and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and I. Rodios, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for (i) annulment of point 22 of Table A in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), point 22 of Table A in the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11), and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1), in so far as those measures concern the applicant, and (ii) a declaration that Article 20(1)(b) of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39) and Article 16(2) of Council Regulation No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1) are not to apply to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/18

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2014 — EDF v Commission

(Case T-389/12) (1)

2014/C 78/37

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/44

Order of the General Court of 25 November 2013 — Shark v OHIM — Monster Energy (UNLEASH THE BEAST!)

(Case T-217/12) (1)

2014/C 45/77

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 217, 21.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 253/29

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2014 — Axa Versicherung v Commission

(Case T-526/12) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 253/41

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Axa Versicherung AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Bahr, S. Dethof and A. Malec, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission to refuse the applicants access to documents from the case-file in Case COMP/39.125 (Car glass).

Operative part of the order

1) There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2) There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of AGC Glass Europe SA, AGC Automotive Europe SA and AGC Glass Germany GmbH.

3) The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by AXA Versicherung AG.

4) AGC Glass Europe, AGC Automotive Europe and AGC Glass Germany are ordered to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/37

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2014 — Versalis v Commission

(Joined Cases T-241/12 and T-210/13) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Partial annulment and alteration by the General Court of the Commission’s decision - Reopening of the procedure - New statement of objections - Closure of the procedure - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 135/47

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Versalis SpA (San Donato Milanese, Italy) (represented by: F. Moretti, L. Nascimbene and M. Siragusa, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, G. Conte, R. Striani and T. Vecchi, Agents)

Re:

In Case T-241/12, application for annulment of the Commission’s decision contained in a letter of 23 April 2012, informing the applicant of the Commission’s intention to reopen the procedure and to adopt a new statement of objections and, in Case T-210/13, application for annulment of Commission decisions C(2013) 1200 final of 26 February 2013 and C(2013) 1199 final of 27 February 2013 to reopen the procedure and to send the applicant a new statement of objections in Case AT. 40032–BR/ESBR — Recidivism, following the partial annulment by the General Court of Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final of 29 November 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene Rubber and Emulsion Styrene Butadiene Rubber).

Operative part of the order

1. Cases T-241/12 and T-210/13 are joined for the purposes of the order.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present actions.

3. Versalis SpA and the European Commission shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
Order of the General Court of 9 January 2015 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission

(Case T-482/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Application initiating proceedings - Disregard of formal requirements - Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2015/C 073/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV (Rosbach, Germany) (represented by: H.-H. Heyland, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and T. Scharf, acting as Agents, assisted initially by R. Van der Hout and A. Krämer, and subsequently by R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission refusing to grant the applicant full access to the documents in the file relating to the contract LIEN 97-2011 and, in the alternative, application for partial annulment of the Commission’s decision of 28 August 2012 in response to the applicant’s letter of 27 July 2012 requesting that the Commission comply with the judgment of 22 May 2012 in Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission, T-300/10, EU:T:2012:247.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/25

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — Marouf v Council

(Case T-569/12) (1)

2014/C 329/38

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/15

Order of the General Court of 17 March 2017 — Deutsche Post v Commission

(Case T-152/12) (1)

((State aid - Postal sector - Aid granted to Deutsche Post by the German authorities - Increase in the cost of stamps combined with subsidies paid in order to cover the pension costs of employees engaged as officials - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: J. Sedemund, T. Lübbig and M. Klasse, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Grespan, T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: UPS Europe NV/SA (Brussels, Belgium) and United Parcel Service Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG (Neuss, Germany) (represented by: initially by E. Henny and T. Ottervanger, lawyers, and subsequently by T. Ottervanger, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Articles 1 to 4 and 6 of Commission Decision 2012/636/EU of 25 January 2012 concerning Measure C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07) implemented by Germany for Deutsche Post AG (OJ 2012 L 289, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Deutsche Post AG.

3. UPS Europe and United Parcel Service Deutschland are ordered to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/27

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — PAN Europe and Stichting Natuur en Milieu v Commission

(Case T-574/12) (1)

((Environment - Regulation (EC) No 149/2008 - Maximum residue levels for pesticides - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Request for internal review - No further interest in bringing an action - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 320/42)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (Brussels, Belgium) and Stichting Natuur en Milieu (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: F. Martens, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, B. Burggraaf, P. Ondrůšek and G. von Rintelen, subsequently, B. Burggraaf, G. von Rintelen and P. Oliver, and, lastly, G. von Rintelen, H. Kranenborg and L. Pignataro-Nolin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of 16 October 2012 whereby the Commission dismissed as unfounded the applicants’ requests for internal review of Commission Regulation (EC) No 149/2008 of 29 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing Annexes II, III and IV setting maximum residue levels for products covered by Annex I thereto (OJ 2008 L 58, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) and Stichting Natuur en Milieu shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/30

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2013 — Seal Trademarks v OHIM — Exel Composites (XCEL)

(Case T-14/13) (1)

2013/C 336/66

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/82

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 May 2013 — Talanton v Commission

(Case T-165/13 R)

(Interim relief - Arbitration clause - Contracts entered into under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Eligible costs - Repayment of sums paid - Application for stay of execution - No urgency)

2013/C 225/182

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Talanton AE — Simvouleftiki-Ekpaideftiki Etairia Dianomon, Parochis Ipiresion Marketigk kai Dioikisis Epicheiriseon (Talanton SA Business Consulting and Marketing Services) (Athens, Greece) (represented by M. Angelopoulos and K. Damis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Cordewener and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for stay of execution of a number of acts concerning the repayment of sums paid to the applicant under contracts entered into under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/21

Order of the President of the General Court of 18 December 2013 — Istituto Di Vigilanza Dell’Urbe SpA v European Commission

(Case T-579/13 R)

(Interim measures - Public services contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision of security guard and reception services at the ‘European Union Houses’ in Rome and Milan - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Application for suspension of operation - Disregard of the formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 39/35

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Istituto Di Vigilanza Dell’Urbe SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: D. Dodaro and S. Cianciullo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Moro and L. Cappelletti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application seeking the suspension of the operation of the award decision, adopted on 27 August 2013 by the Commission, relating to a public service contract concerning security guard and reception services at the ‘European Union Houses’ in Rome and Milan (Italy).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/20

Order of the General Court of 17 October 2013 — Transworld Oil Computer Centrum and Others v Eurojust

(Case T-192/13) (1)

2013/C 359/37

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/39

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 February 2014 — Luxembourg Pamol (Cyprus) and Luxembourg Industries v Commission

(Case T-578/13 R)

((Application for interim measures - Procedure for placing plant protection products on the market - Publication of documents relating to the inclusion of an active substance - Rejection of the request for confidential treatment of certain information - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Admissibility - Urgency - Prima facie case - Weighing up of the interests involved))

2014/C 135/50

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Luxembourg Pamol (Cyprus) Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus); and Luxembourg Industries Ltd (Tel-Aviv, Israel) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen and P. Ondrůšek, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the Commission’s decision communicated to the applicants by letter of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) of 8 October 2013 rejecting the request for confidential treatment of certain information contained in the peer review report and final addendum thereto concerning the inclusion of the active substance potassium phosphonates submitted by the applicants pursuant to Article 14 of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ 1991 L 230, p. 1) and Commission Regulation (EU) No 188/2011 of 25 February 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Directive 91/414 as regards the procedure for the assessment of active substances which were not on the market 2 years after the date of notification of that Directive (OJ 2011 L 53, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1) Operation of the Commission’s decision communicated to Luxembourg Pamol (Cyprus) Ltd and Luxembourg Industries Ltd by letter of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) of 8 October 2013 rejecting their request for confidential treatment of certain information contained in the peer review report and final addendum thereto concerning the inclusion of the active substance potassium phosphonates is suspended.

2) The European Commission shall ensure that EFSA does not publish a version of the peer review report and final addendum thereto concerning the inclusion of the active substance potassium phosphonates that is more detailed than the redacted version included in the letter of Luxembourg Pamol (Cyprus) Ltd and Luxembourg Industries of 25 February 2013, as set out in Annex A3 to the application in the main proceedings.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/34

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2013 — Castell Macía v OHIM — PJ Hungary (PEPE CASTELL)

(Case T-242/13) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2014/C 45/58

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: José Castell Macía (Elche, Spain) (represented by: G. Marín Raigal, P. López Ronda, G. Macias Bonilla and H. Mosback, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) (Budapest, Hungary)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 February 2013 (Case R 1401/2012-1), relating to opposition proceedings between PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) and M. José Castell Macía.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/45

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 February 2014 — Serco Belgium and Others v Commission

(Case T-644/13 R)

((Interim proceedings - Public procurement - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tender - Application for suspension of operation - Prima facie case))

2014/C 175/62

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Serco Belgium SA (Brussels, Belgium); SA Bull NV (Brussels); and Unisys Belgium SA (Brussels) (represented by: V. Ost and M. Vanderstraeten, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude, L. Cappelletti and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for, first, suspension of operation of the decision of the Commission of 30 October 2013 rejecting the tender submitted by the consortium formed by the applicants in the public tendering procedure DIGIT/R2/PO/2012/026 — ITIC-SM (IT service management for the integrated and consolidated IT desktop environment of the European Commission) (OJ 2012/S 69 — 112095) and awarding the contract to another consortium, secondly, an order that the Commission refrain from concluding the framework contract at issue and from concluding specific contracts under that framework contract and, thirdly, the grant of any other appropriate interim measures.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 151/35

Order of the General Court of 25 March 2014 — Netherlands v Commission

(Case T-542/13) (1)

2014/C 151/45

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.13.