ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 71/19

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2013 — La Navale v Commission

(Case T-263/00) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 71/30

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: La Navale Soc. coop. rl (Venice, Italy) (represented by: A. Vianello, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (initially represented by: U. Leanza, then by I. Braguglia, then by R. Adam, and finally by I. Bruni, Agents, assisted by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50).

Operative part of the order

1. The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance;

2. The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law;

3. La Navale Soc. coop. rl shall bear the Commission’s costs in addition to its own costs;

4. The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/44

Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Codess Sociale and Others v Commission

(Case T-235/00) (1)

2011/C 347/78

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 4, 6.1.2001.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 327/23

Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 September 2008 — Regione Siciliana v Commission

(Case T-363/03) (1)

(Action for annulment - ERDF - Cancellation of a financial contribution - Recovery of the sums already paid - Regional or local entity - Lack of direct effect - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 327/43)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Regione Siciliana (Italy) (represented by: A. Cingolo, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. de March and L. Flynn, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

First, application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2003) 2890 final of 13 August 2003 concerning cancellation of the contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) granted to the applicant by Commission Decision C(90) 2363 025 of 14 December 1990 in respect of an infrastructure project in Sicily and the recovery of the sums already paid by the Commission in connection with that contribution; secondly, application for annulment of Commission debit note No 3240504102 of 26 September 2003; and, thirdly, annulment of any other connected or prior measure

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Regione Siciliana is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 304, 13.12.2003.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 37/22

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 December 2007 — Schering-Plough Ltd v Commission and EMEA

(Case T-133/03) (1)

(Action for annulment - Partial inadmissibility - Interest in bringing proceedings - Application devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 37/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Schering-Plough Ltd (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: G. Berrisch and P. Bogaert, lawyers)

Defendants: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and M. Shotter, acting as Agents) European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA), (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: initially by N. Khan, acting as Agent, and C. Sherliker, solicitor, and subsequently by C. Sherliker, solicitor, and T. Eicke, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the applicant: European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), established in Geneva (Switzerland), (represented by: N. Rampal, U. Zinsmeister and D. Waelbroeck, lawyers)

Re:

Action for the annulment of the EMEA measure of 14 February 2003 refusing a ‘Type 1’ variation of the name of the pharmaceutical form ‘oral lyophilisat’ from ‘Allex 5 mg oral lyophilisate’ to ‘Allex Reditabs 5 mg oral lyophilisate’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible in so far as it is directed against the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA).

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it is directed against the Commission.

3. The EMEA shall bear its own costs.

4. Schering-Plough Ltd shall pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 19.7.2003.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 92/45

Order of the Court of First Instance of 1 February 2008 — Nomura Principal Investment and Nomura v Commission

(Case T-430/04) (1)

(2008/C 92/89)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 31, 5.2.2005.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 11/38

Order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2009 — Nestlé v OHIM — Quick (QUICKY)

(Case T-74/04) (1)

2010/C 11/70

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/35

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008 — Tachelet v Commission

(Case T-293/04) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Interlocutory judgment - No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 301/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Guy Tachelet (Rijmenam, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 2 September 2003 altering the applicant's classification in grade, in so far as it fixes his classification in step on recruitment in step 2 of Grade B4 and did not re-establish the applicant's career grade, and an application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant's complaint and, second, an application for compensation for the damage allegedly caused by that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The Commission shall pay all the costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 71/20

Order of the General Court of 10 January 2013 — MyTravel v Commission

(Case T-403/05 RENV) (1)

(Access to institutions’ documents - Documents concerning a merger decision annulled by the General Court - Refusal to grant access - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 71/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: MyTravel Group plc (Rochdale, Lancashire, United Kingdom) (represented initially by: S. Cardell, B. Louveaux, P. Walter and P. Horan, Solicitors, and subsequently by: B. Louveaux, P. Walter and P. Horan, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: C. O’Reilly and P. Costa de Oliveira, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: P. Costa de Oliveira, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented initially by: A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz, C. Stege and U. Persson, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: A. Falk and U. Persson, acting as Agents); Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: C.H. Vang and V. Pasternak Jørgensen, acting as Agents); Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels and J. Langer, acting as Agents); and the Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and B. Klein, acting as Agents); French Republic (represented by: E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and A. Adam, acting as Agents); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: E. Jenkinson and S. Ossowski, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission Decisions of 5 September (D(2005) 8461) and 12 October 2005 (D(2005) 9763) rejecting an application brought by the applicant to obtain access to certain documents preparatory to Commission Decision 2000/276/EC of 22 September 1999 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case IV/M.1524 — Airtours/First Choice) (OJ 2000 L 93, p. 1), and to documents drafted by the Commission’s services as a consequence of the annulment of that decision by the judgment of the General Court in Case T 342/99 Airtours v Commission (2002) ECR II-2585

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. MyTravel Group plc shall bear half of its own costs in Cases T-403/05 and T-403/05 RENV and pay half of the costs incurred by the European Commission in Cases T-403/05 and T-403/05 RENV.

3. The European Commission shall bear half of its own costs in Cases T-403/05 and T-403/05 RENV and pay half of the costs incurred by MyTravel Group plc in Cases T-403/05 and T-403/05 RENV.

4. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Kingdom of Sweden in Case C-506/08 P.

5. The Kingdom of Sweden shall bear its own costs in Case T-403/05 RENV.

6. The Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall bear their own costs in Cases C-508/06 P and T-403/05 RENV.

(1) OJ C 10, 14.1.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 313/33

Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Gippini Fournier v Commission

(Case T-23/05) (1)

(Action for annulment - Action for damages - Staff case - Promotion - Award of priority points - Act not capable of being appealed - Preparatory acts - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 313/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Éric Gippini Fournier (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Theissen and, subsequently, by F. Ruggeri Laderchi, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, Agents, and D. Waelbroek, lawyer)

Re:

First, annulment of the Commission decisions not to award the applicant any priority points under the 2003 promotion procedure; to reject his appeal to the Promotions Committee seeking the award of priority points of any description; and to refuse to award priority points for work in the interest of the institution and, second, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 8/15

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2007 — Investire Partecipazioni v Commission

(Case T-102/06) (1)

(Action for annulment - ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 8/29)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Investire Partecipazioni SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G.M. Roberti and A. Franchi, Lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Velardo and L. Flynn, Agents, assisted by G. Faedo, Lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 4683 of 25 November 2005, concerning a reduction of the assistance granted by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) pursuant to Decision C(97) 2199, of 27 July 1997, approving assistance from the ERDF for measures provided for in the Objective 2 Single Programming Document for the period 1997-1999 concerning the region of Piedmont (Italy).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Investire Partecipazioni is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 107/26

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 February 2008 — Apple Computer International v Commission

(Case T-82/06) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Common Customs Tariff - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Person not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 107/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Apple Computer International (Cork, Ireland) (represented by: G. Breen, Solicitor, P. Sreenan SC, and B. Quigley, Barrister)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis and J. Hottiaux, Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2171/2005 of 23 December 2005 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2005 L 346, p. 7)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Apple Computer International shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 51/60

Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2007 — Estancia Piedra v OHIM — Franciscan Vineyards (ESTANCIA PIEDRA)

(Case T-160/06) (1)

(2008/C 51/110)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 223/42

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 July 2008 — Calebus v Commission

(Case T-366/06) (1)

(Action for annulment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Decision 2006/613/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region - Challengeable act - Lack of direct effect - Inadmissible)

(2008/C 223/72)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Calebus S.A. (Almería, Spain) (represented by: R. Bocanegra Sierra, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and D. Recchia, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, abogado del Estado)

Re:

Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2006 L 259, p. 1), in so far as it declares the site designated as ‘Ramblas de Jergal, Tabernas y Sur de Sierra Alhamilla’, which includes land belonging to the applicant, to be a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Calebus S.A. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission;

3. The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 171/48

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 May 2008 — Fränkischer Weinbauverband v OHIM (three-dimensional mark ‘Bocksbeutel’)

(Case T-180/06) (1)

(2008/C 171/93)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 327/41

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 November 2008 — Xinhui Alida Polythene v Council

(Case T-364/06) (1)

(2008/C 327/76)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/63

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italian Republic v Commission

(Case T-157/06) (1)

(2008/C 301/113)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 267/82

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 September 2009 — Fjord Seafood Norway and Others v Council

(Case T-113/06) (1)

2009/C 267/146

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be in part removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 44/46

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 December 2008 — RSA Security Ireland v Commission

(Case T-227/06) (1)

(Action for annulment - Common Customs Tariff - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Person not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2009/C 44/80)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: RSA Security Ireland Ltd (Shannon, Ireland) (represented by: B. Conway, Barrister, and S. Daly, Solicitor)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis and J. Hottiaux, Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 888/2006 of 16 June 2006 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2006 L 165, p. 6).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. RSA Security Ireland Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 249, 14.10.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 107/43

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 February 2008 — Air One SpA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-266/07) (1)

(2008/C 107/73)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.
1.

The Court of First Instance disclaims jurisdiction in Case T-215/07 in favour of the Court of Justice so that the latter may rule on the application for annulment.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 183/30

Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 June 2008 — Malheiro v Commission

(Case T-228/07) (1)

(2008/C 183/59)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 8.9.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 171/35

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2008 — Lactalis Gestion Lait and Lactalis Investissements v Council

(Case T-29/07) (1)

(Action for annulment - Directive 2006/112/EC - Repeal of the First VAT Directive - Partial annulment - Not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 171/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Lactalis Gestion Lait SNC and Lactalis Investissements SNC (Laval, France) (represented by: A. Philippart, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A.-M. Colaert and M. Iosifidou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) to the extent that it repeals the fourth and eighth recitals in the preamble to and the first and third paragraphs of Article 1 of Council Directive 67/227/EEC on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes of 11 April 1967 (OJ, English Special Edition 1967, p. 14).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene made by the Commission and the Kingdom of Spain.

3. Lactalis Gestion Lait SNC and Lactalis Investissements SNC are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 285/41

Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 — Serviço Intermunicipalizado de Gestão de Resíduos do Grande Porto (Lipor) v Commission

(Case T-26/07) (1)

(Action for annulment - Cohesion Fund - Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 - Reduction of financial assistance - No direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 285/76)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Serviço Intermunicipalizado de Gestão de Resíduos do Grande Porto (Lipor) (Baguim do Monte, Portugal) (represented by: P. Moura Pinheiro, M. Gorjão Henriques and F. Quintela, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and A. Weimar, Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of decision C(2006) 5008 of the Commission of 17 October 2006 concerning the reduction of the Cohesion Fund as regards certain projects relating to the factory for the incineration of solid urban waste of household origin in the Region of Porto.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Serviço Intermunicipalizado de Gestão de Resíduos do Grande Porto (Lipor) shall pay its own costs and those incurred by the Commission.

(1) OJ C 82 of 17.4.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 223/58

Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2008 — CityLine Hungary v Commission

(Case T-237/07) (1)

(2008/C 223/104)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 327/26

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 30 October 2008 — France v Commission

(Case T-257/07 R II)

(Application for interim measures - Health measures - Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 - Eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies - Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 - Application for suspension of operation - Prima facie case - Urgency - Balancing of interests)

(2008/C 327/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: E. Belliard, R. Loosli-Surrans, A.-L. During and G. de Bergues, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Nolin and A. Bordes, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by: C. Gibbs and I. Rao, later by I. Rao, acting as Agents, assisted by T. Ward, barrister)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 of 17 June 2008 amending Annexe VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (OJ 2008 L 202, p. 11), in so far as it introduces, into Chapter A of Annex VII point 2.3(b)(iii), point 2.3(d) and point 4

Operative part of the order

1. The Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 of 17 June 2008 amending Annexe VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies is suspended until judgment has been given in the main action in so far as it introduces, into Chapter A of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of 22 May 2001 point 2.3(b)(iii), point 2.3(d) and point 4;
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/64

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italian Republic v Commission

(Case T-61/07) (1)

(2008/C 301/120)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 69/53

Order of the Court of First Instance of 15 January 2009 — Commission v Banca di Roma

(Case T-261/07) (1)

(2009/C 69/117)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 19/36

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 November 2008 — Kuiburi Fruit Canning v Council

(Case T-330/07) (1)

(2009/C 19/70)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.