ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/30

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v Commission

(Case T-120/09) (1)

(State aid - Subsidy provided for by German law for insolvent companies - Complaint for alleged breach of Community law - Rejection of the complaint - Adoption of a later decision - No need to adjudicate)

2010/C 301/51

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Phoenix-Reisen GmbH (Bonn, Germany) and Deutscher Reiseverband eV (DRV) (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: R. Gerharz and A. Funke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and B. Martenczuk, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by J. Möller and B. Klein, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 13 February 2009 in which it states its intention not to take action against the Federal Republic of Germany for alleged State aid paid by means of insolvency benefit payments.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for joinder of the present case with case T-58/10 lodged by the applicants.

3. Each party is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 211/24

Order of the General Court of 23 May 2011 — Y v Commission

(Case T-493/09 P) (1)

(Appeal - Staff case - Contract agents - Dismissal - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 211/53

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Y (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by J. Van Rossum, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented originally by J.-P. Keppenne and L. Lozano Palacios, and then by J.-P. Keppenne and D. Martin, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 7 October 2009 in Case F-29/08 Y v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Y is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in these proceedings.

(1) OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 72/33

Order of the General Court of 10 January 2011 — Labate v Commission

(Case T-389/09) (1)

2011/C 72/51

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/44

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — Inovis v OHIM — Sonaecom (INOVIS)

(Case T-502/09) (1)

2011/C 347/81

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) C 51, 27.2.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/17

Order of the General Court of 4 July 2011 — Sepracor Pharmaceuticals v Commission

(Case T-275/09) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Active substance eszopiclone - Marketing authorisation - Refusal of recognition as a new active substance - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 282/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: I. Dodds-Smith, Solicitor, D. Anderson QC, and J. Stratford, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos, and subsequently by M. Wilderspin and M. Šimerdová, Agents)

Re:

ACTION for annulment of the decision in the letter of the Commission addressed to the applicant on 6 May 2009 in the context of the procedure for authorising the placing on the market of Lunivia, inasmuch as it concerns classification of the active substance eszopiclone

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 151/27

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2012 — Associazione ‘Giùlemanidallajuve’ v European Commission

(Case T-273/09) (1)

(Competition - Restrictive practices - Abuse of dominant position - Rejection of a complaint - Legitimate interest - Community interest - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2012/C 151/43

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Associazione ‘Giùlemanidallajuve’ (Cerignola, Italy) (represented by: L. Misson, G. Ernes and A. Pel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and V. Di Bucci, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Derenne, lawyer)

supported by

Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA), (Zurich, Switzerland), (represented by: A. Barav and D. Reymond, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission decision C(2009) 3916 of 12 May 2009, taken pursuant to Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 and rejecting, for lack of legitimate interest and lack of Community interest, the complaint submitted by the applicant concerning the infringement of Articles 81 EC and 82 EC allegedly committed by the Federazione italiana giuoco calcio, the Comitato olimpico nazionale italiano, the Union of European Football Associations and the Fédération Internationale de football association, in the context of the sanctions imposed on Juventus Football Club SpA de Turin (Italy) (Case COMP/39.464 — Supporters Juventus Turin v FIGC-CONI-UEFA-FIFA)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The Associazione ‘Giùlemanidallajuve’ shall pay its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) shall pay its own costs.

(1) OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/23

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2012 — Ayadi v Commission

(Case T-527/09) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban - Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 - Removal of the interested party from the list of persons and entities concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 89/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chafiq Ayadi (Dublin (Ireland)) (represented by: initially B. Emmerson QC, S. Cox, Barrister, and H. Miller, Solicitor, and subsequently by E. Grieves, Barrister, and H. Miller)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Paasivirta, T. Scharf and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Finnegan and R. Szostak, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 954/2009 of 13 October 2009 amending for the 114th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban (OJ 2009 L 269, p. 20), in so far as that act concerns the applicant

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, shall pay those incurred by Mr Chafiq Ayadi and shall be required to refund to the cashier of the General Court the sums advanced by way of legal aid.

3. The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/44

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — Intercéréales and Grossi v Commission

(Case T-314/09) (1)

((State aid - Framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented - Financing by voluntary levies made compulsory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 175/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Intercéréales (Paris, France); and Alain Grossi (Nimes, France) (represented initially by: B. Le Bret and L. Olza Moreno, and subsequently by: B. Le Bret and C. Renner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, subsequently by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, and finally by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008 concerning State aid No 561/2008, on the framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/78

Order of the General Court of 15 May 2013 — Al-Faqih and MIRA v Council and Commission

(Case T-322/09) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban - Freezing of funds - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 225/174

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Saad Al-Faqih (London, United Kingdom) and Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia (MIRA) (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Jones, Barrister, and A. Raja, solicitor)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented initially by R. Szostak and E. Finnegan, then by E. Finnegan and J.-P. Hix, agents); and European Commission (represented by T. Scharf and M. Konstantinidis, agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freeze of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (OJ 2002 L 139, p. 9), as amended for the 42nd time by Commission Regulation (EC) No 14/2005 of 5 January 2005 (OJ 2005 L 5, p. 10), for the 48th time by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1190/2005 of 20 July 2005 (OJ 2005 L 193, p. 27), for the 75th time by Commission Regulation (EC) No 492/2007 of 3 May 2007 (OJ 2007 L 116, p. 5) and for the 116th time by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1102/2009 of 16 November 2009 (OJ 2009 L 303, p. 39), and/or an application for annulment of Regulations Nos 14/2005, 1190/2005, 492/2007 and 1102/2009, in so far as they concern the applicants

Operative part of the order

The General Court orders:

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union and the European Commission shall jointly and severally pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 179/39

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 May 2010 — Reagens v Commission

(Case T-30/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application for suspension of operation of the decision - Financial loss - Absence of exceptional circumstances - No urgency)

2010/C 179/69

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Reagens SpA (San Giorgio di Piano, Italy) (represented by: B. O’Connor, Solicitor, and L. Toffoletti, D. Gullo and E. De Giorgi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Bourke and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for suspension of operation of the Commission decision of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/38.589 — heat stabilisers)

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 328/30

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 October 2010 — Nencini v Parliament

(Case T-431/10 R)

(Interim measures - Member of the European Parliament - Recovery of allowances paid in reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses and of travel costs - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2010/C 328/52

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Riccardo Nencini (Barberino di Mugello, Italy) (represented by: F. Bertini, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorens, A. Caiola and D. Moore, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for stay of execution of a number of acts of the Parliament relating to the recovery of parliamentary allowances wrongly received

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 234/38

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Strålfors v OHIM (ID SOLUTIONS)

(Case T-211/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility)

2010/C 234/70

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Strålfors AB (Malmö, Sweden) (represented by: M.S. Nielsen, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Re:

Action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2010 (Case R 1111/2009-2), concerning an application for registration of word sign ID SOLUTIONS as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Strålfors AB shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/17

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2011 — M v EMA

(Case T-136/10) (1)

(Action for damages - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court - Referral back to the Civil Service Tribunal)

2011/C 89/39

Language of the case: English.

Parties

Applicant: M (Broxbourne, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Thomann, Barrister, and I. Khawaja, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: V. Salvatore and N. Rampal Olmedo, agents)

Re:

Action for damages, under Articles 268 TFEU and 340 TFEU, for loss allegedly sustained as a result of an accident at work.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is referred back to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal.

2. The costs are reserved.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 30/57

Order of the General Court of 18 November 2010 — Ferracci v Commission

(Case T-192/10) (1)

()

2011/C 30/105

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 120/19

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2011 — USFSPEI and Others v Council

(Case T-122/10) (1)

2011/C 120/41

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 238/17

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2011 — Amecke Fruchtsaft v OHIM — Uhse (69 Sex up)

(Case T-125/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 238/29

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Amecke Fruchtsaft GmbH & Co. KG (Menden, Germany) (represented by: R. Kaase and J.-C. Plate, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner and subsequently S. Schäffner and B. Schmidt, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Beate Uhse Einzelhandels GmbH (Flensburg, Germany) (represented by: W. Berlit, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2010 (Case R 612/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Beate Uhse Einzelhandels GmbH and Amecke Fruchtsaft GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate.

2. The applicant shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 186/32

Order of the General Court of 13 May 2011 — Commission v Tornasol Films

(Case T-338/10) (1)

2011/C 186/58

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/20

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2011 — Inuit Tapiritt Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-18/10) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 - Trade in seal products - Ban on import and sale - Exception in favour of Inuit communities - Application of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Meaning of ‘regulatory act’ - Absence of direct or individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 319/43

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Inuit Tapiritt Kanatami (Ottawa, Canada); Nattivak Hunters and Trappers Association (Qikiqtarjuaq, Canada); Pangnirtung Hunters’ and Trappers’ Association (Pangnirtung, Canada); Jaypootie Moesesie (Qikiqtarjuaq); Allen Kooneeliusie (Qikiqtarjuaq); Toomasie Newkingnak (Qikiqtarjuaq); David Kuptana (Ulukhaktok, Canada); Karliin Aariak (Iqaluit, Canada); Efstathios Andreas Agathos (Athens, Greece); Canadian Seal Marketing Group (Quebec, Canada); Ta Ma Su Seal Products, Inc. (Cap-aux-Meules, Canada); Fur Institute of Canada (Ottawa); NuTan Furs, Inc. (Catalina, Canada); GC Rieber Skinn AS (Bergen, Norway); Inuit Circumpolar Conference Greenland (ICC) (Nuuk, Greenland, Denmark); Johannes Egede (Nuuk); Kalaallit Nunaanni Aalisartut Piniartullu Kattuffiat (KNAPK) (Nuuk); represented initially by J. Bouckaert, M. van der Woude and H. Viaene, and subsequently by J. Bouckaert and H. Viaene, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. Anagnostopoulou and L. Visaggio, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendants: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by C. Wissels, Y. de Vries, J. Langer and M. Noort, acting as Agents) and European Commission (represented initially by É. White, P. Oliver and J.-B. Laignelot, and subsequently by É. White, P. Oliver and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on trade in seal products (OJ 2009 L 286, p. 36)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, Nattivak Hunters and Trappers Association, Pangnirtung Hunters’ and Trappers’ Association, Jaypootie Moesesie, Allen Kooneeliusie, Toomasie Newkingnak, David Kuptana, Karliin Aariak, Efstathios Andreas Agathos, the Canadian Seal Marketing Group, Ta Ma Su Seal Products, the Fur Institute of Canada, NuTan Furs, Inc., GC Rieber Skinn AS, Inuit Circumpolar Conference Greenland (ICC), Johannes Egede and Kalaallit Nunaanni Aalisartut Piniartullu Kattuffiat (KNAPK) shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

3. The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/19

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Al Saadi v Commission

(Case T-4/10) (1)

(Death of the applicant - Proceedings not resumed by the successors - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 282/36

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Faraj Faraj Hassan Al Saadi (Leicester, United Kingdom) (represented by J. Jones, Barrister and M. Arani, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by M. Konstantinidis, T. Scharf and E. Paasivirta, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by R. Szostak and E. Finnegan, Agents); Italian Republic (represented initially by G. Palmieri, and subsequently by G. Albenzio, lawyers); and French Republic (represented by G. de Bergues, E. Belliard and L. Butel, Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for the annulment in part of Commission Regulation (EC) No 954/2009 of 13 October 2009 amending for the 114th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002, imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, in so far as the applicant appears on the list of persons, groups and entities covered by those provisions (OJ 2009 L 269, p. 20).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on this action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/16

Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — BASF Schweiz and BASF Lampertheim v Commission

(Case T-25/10) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for tin stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Withdrawal of the decision - Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 6/28

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: BASF Schweiz AG, formerly BASF Speciality Chemicals Holding GmbH (Basel, Switzerland), and BASF Lampertheim GmbH (Lampertheim, Germany) (represented by: F. Montag and T. Wilson, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Ronkes Agerbeek and R. Sauer, Agents, and W. Berg, lawyer)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Articles 1 and 2 of Commission Decision final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.589 — Heat Stabilisers) in so far as those provisions concern the applicants and, in the alternative, an application for a reduction of the fines imposed on the applicants in Article 2 of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 331/22

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul Internacional (LINEASUL)

(Case T-598/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal - Cessation of existence of dispute - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 331/44

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Biodes SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Manasul Internacional, SL (Ponferrada, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2010 (Case R 1520/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Manasul Internacional, SL and Biodes, SL.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.