ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 23 January 2019 — MLPS v Commission

(Case T-304/18) (1)

((Action for annulment and for failure to act - Decision to take no further action on a complaint - Refusal by the Commission to institute proceedings under Article 7 TEU - Act not open to challenge - No direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 93/80)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mouvement pour la liberté de la protection sociale (MLPS) (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Gibaud, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa–Lacombe and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 7 March 2018 refusing to take any further action on a complaint requesting that proceedings be brought on the basis of Article 7 TEU against the French Republic and, secondly, action based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully refrained from dealing with that complaint.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The Mouvement pour la liberté de la protection sociale shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — Herholz v EUIPO (#)

(Case T-631/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark # - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Claim for alteration - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 172/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Herholz Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG (Ahaus, Germany) (represented by: D. Sprenger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Sesma Merino and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 August 2018 (Case R 445/2018-2), regarding an application for registration of the word sign # as an EU trade mark

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Herholz Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 — PAN Europe v Commission

(Case T-25/18) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Documents relating to endocrine-disrupting substances - Withdrawal of the decision refusing access - Disclosure after the action had been brought - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 139/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Kloostra, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet, I. Naglis and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 7604 final of 9 November 2017, in so far as it refuses access to documents relating to endocrine-disrupting substances.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission

(Case T-419/18) (1)

(2019/C 230/78)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 319, 10.9.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — YQ v Commission

(Case T-570/18) (1)

(2019/C 213/82)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB

(Case T-687/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority - Appointment of a contact person - Limited communication with the ECB - Procedural defects - Intermediary or preparatory measures - Rights of defence - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 328/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pilatus Bank plc (Ta’Xbiex, Malta) (represented by: O. Behrends, M. Kirchner and L. Feddern, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Yoo, M. Puidokas and A. Karpf, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the ECB’s email of 10 September 2018 in so far as, by that email, the ECB requested the applicant to direct its communications via the Competent Person appointed under Maltese law or with the Competent Person’s approval.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible;

2. Pilatus Bank plc shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — JPMorgan Chase and Others v Commission

(Case T-420/18) (1)

(2019/C 246/49)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 October 2019 — Aeris Invest v SRB

(Case T-599/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms - Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - No ex-post definitive valuation of Banco Popular Español - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 423/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Aeris Invest Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset, P. Medina Sánchez and A. Sellés Marco, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: A. Valavanidou, I. Georgiopoulos and E. Muratori, acting as Agents, and B. Meyring, S. Schelo, F. Málaga Diéguez, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch, M. Bettermann, S. Ianc and M. Rickert, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the ‘decision of the SRB, notified to the applicant by letter of 14 September 2018, not to carry out an ex-post definitive valuation of Banco Popular Español, SA’.

Operative part of the order

The Court orders:

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Aeris Invest Sàrl shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — Carrefour (Representation of crossed lines)

(Case T-424/18) (1)

(2019/C 363/46)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.
Order of the General Court of 30 January 2020 –Latvia v Commission

(Case T-293/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Common fisheries policy - Treaty of Paris on the archipelago of Spitsbergen (Norway) - Fishing opportunities for snow crab around the area of Svalbard (Norway) - Regulation (EU) 2017/127 - EU registered vessels authorised to fish - Detention of a Latvian vessel - Article 265 TFEU - Invitation to act - Adoption of a position by the Commission - Measure not producing binding legal effects - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 95/40)

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: V. Soņeca, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, E. Paasivirta, I. Naglis and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Commission’s letter of 12 March 2018 by which that institution adopted its position on the invitation to act which the Republic of Latvia had addressed to it, pursuant to Article 265 TFEU, by letter of 22 December 2017 and which was intended, in essence, to require the Commission to adopt measures relating to the defence of the fishing rights and European Union interests in the Svalbard fishing area (Norway) and, second, to order the Commission to adopt a position in that regard which is not the source of legal effects unfavourable to the Republic of Latvia.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain;

3. The Republic of Latvia shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of those relating to the application for leave to intervene;

4. The Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Latvia and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 November 2019 – Lipitalia 2000 and Assograssi v Commission

(Case T-189/18) (1)

(2020/C 27/73)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Order of the General Court of 19 January 2021 — Umweltinstitut München v Commission

(Case T-712/18) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a meeting of the Joint Management Committee for Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures established by the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, on the one hand, and the European Union and its Member States, on the other hand (CETA) - Refusal of partial access - Disclosure of the requested document after the appeal has been lodged - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 79/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Umweltinstitut München-Verein zur Erforschung und Verminderung der Umweltbelastung eV (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. John, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar, F. Erlbacher and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 6539 final of 2 October 2018 refusing access to certain documents relating to the meeting of the Joint Management Committee for Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures established by the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, on the one hand, and the European Union and its Member States, on the other hand, (CETA) signed in Brussels on 30 October 2016, held on 26 and 27 March 2018 in Ottawa (Canada).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to rule on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 44, 4.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — ZE v Parlement

(Case T-603/18) (1)

(2020/C 240/48)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2022 — Van Haren Schoenen v Commission

(Case T-126/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/50)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.
Order of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Chrysses Demetriades & Co. and Provident Fund of the Employees of Chrysses Demetriades & Co. v Council and Others

(Case T-198/18) (1)

(2021/C 263/47)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 182, 28.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 September 2019 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Big Bang (LTC latiendaencasa.es BIG BANG DAY)

(Case T-376/19) (1)

(2019/C 363/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Bacardi v EUIPO — La Fée (ANGEL’S ENVY)

(Case T-115/19) (1)

(2019/C 230/80)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Order of the General Court of 25 September 2019 — Magnan v Commission

(Case T-99/19) (1)

(Action for failure to act, for damages and for annulment - Free movement of workers - Freedom to choose an occupation - Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons - Alleged infringement of that agreement by Swiss laws and regulations governing the exercise of the profession of medical practitioner - Application for the adoption of measures against Switzerland and application for compensation for harm suffered - Reply of EEAS - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 423/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Nathaniel Magnan (Aix-en-Provence, France) (represented by: J. Fayolle, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Støvlbæk, J. Hottiaux and M. Šimerdová, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application (i) under Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to take measures against the Swiss Confederation following an alleged infringement of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons (OJ 2002 L 114, p. 6), signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999, (ii) under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission refusing to adopt measures against the Swiss Confederation, contained in the letter of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 20 December 2018 and (iii) under Articles 268 and 340 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm that the applicant has allegedly suffered since 2013 due to an infringement of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, as well as a penalty payment.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Nathaniel Magnan shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.
Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Souruh v Council

(Case T-137/19) (1)

(Action for damages - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds - Lack of jurisdiction)

(2019/C 399/85)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Souruh SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Jaume and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following the adoption of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018, amending Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018, L 131, p. 16), and its subsequent implementing acts, and following Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 of 17 May 2019, amending Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2019 L 132, p. 36), in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Souruh SA is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2019 — Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-566/19) (1)

(2020/C 36/48)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 November 2019 — CF v Parliament

(Case T-361/19) (1)

(2020/C 10/68)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Shindler and Others v Council

(Case T-541/19) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Law governing the institutions - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - UK citizens residing in another EU Member State - 2019 European elections - Application for postponement of the European elections - Lack of standing to bring proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 95/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Harry Shindler (Porto d'Ascoli, Italy) and the five other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: J. Fouchet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Council acted unlawfully by failing to adopt a decision postponing the 2019 European elections with a view to allowing the applicants to play a part in the ballot.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Harry Shindler and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2019 — Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaamse Gewest v Parliament and Council

(Case T-66/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Internal market - Fundamental freedoms - Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 - Establishment of a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services - Sub-national authority - Standing to bring proceedings - Individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 61/51)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Vlaamse Gemeenschap (Belgium) and Vlaamse Gewest (Belgium) (represented by: T. Eyskens, N. Bonbled and P. Geysens, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. McDowell, R. van de Westelaken and M. Peternel, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Michoel and O. Segnana, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 October 2018 establishing a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.

3. Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaamse Gewest shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the European Parliament and by the Council of the European Union.

4. The Commission shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.
Order of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — AF v FRA

(Case T-31/19) (1)

(Action for annulment and damages - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 - Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ - 2014 Staff Regulations - No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above - 2017 reclassification exercise - Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 191/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: AF (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (represented by: M. O’Flaherty, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the FRA decision of 9 May 2018 not to include the applicant’s name in the list of temporary staff eligible for reclassification to grade AD 13 in the 2017 reclassification exercise and, secondly, compensation for the loss he has allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) shall bear its own costs and pay one quarter of the costs incurred by AF.

3. AF shall bear three quarters of his own costs.

(1) OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 February 2020 — Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management v EUIPO — Lacoste (LOVE PINK)

(Case T-582/19) (1)

(2020/C 137/87)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Aurora v CPVO — SESVanderhave (M 02205)

(Case T-278/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Plant varieties - Nullity proceedings - Sugar beet variety M 02205 - Decision to remit the case to the competent body of the CPVO for further action - Article 72 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 - No interest in bringing proceedings - Power to alter decisions - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 222/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aurora Srl (Padua, Italy) (represented by: L.B. Buchman, lawyer)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (represented by: M. Ekvad, F. Mattina, M. Garcia Monco-Fuente and A. Weitz, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO, intervener before the General Court: SESVanderhave NV (Tienen, Belgium) (represented by: P. de Jong, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 27 February 2019 (Case A 10/2013 RENV), concerning nullity proceedings between Aurora and SESVanderhave.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Aurora Srl, the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) and SESVanderhave NV shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — Thai World Import & Export v EUIPO — Elvir (Yaco)

(Case T-3/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 201/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Thai World Import & Export Co. Ltd (Bangkok, Thailand) (represented by: S. Bénoliel-Claux, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Elvir (Condé-sur-Vire, France) (represented by: M. Lhotel, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 October 2018 (Case R 319/2018-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Elvir and Thai World Import & Export Co.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Thai World Import & Export Co. Ltd and Elvir shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Einkaufsbüro Deutscher Eisenhändler v EUIPO — Tigges (TOOLINEO)

(Case T-877/19) (1)

(2020/C 313/49)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2020 — Limango v EUIPO — Consolidated Artists (limango)

(Case T-23/19) (1)

(2020/C 262/51)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.