ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/48

Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 September 2009 — Ivanov v Commission

(Case T-166/08) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Local administrative and technical staff - Rejection of application - Jurisdiction of the Tribunal - Annulment action time-barred - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Act of the European Ombudsman - Action partially inadmissible and partially manifestly devoid of any legal basis)

2009/C 282/92

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Vladimir Ivanov (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Curall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

The applicant claims to have suffered as a result of the Commission's decision refusing to recruit him as a

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Vladimir Ivanov is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 183, 19.7.2008.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 179/57

Order of the General Court of 11 May 2010 — Shetland Islands Council v Commission

(Case T-43/08) (1)

2010/C 179/97

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 134/50

Order of the General Court of 18 March 2010 — Papierfabrik Hamburger-Spremberg v Commission

(Case T-350/08) (1)

2010/C 134/82

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 272, 25.10.2008.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/34

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — FIFA v OHIM — Ferrero (WORLD CUP 2006 and Others)

(Joined Cases T-444/08 to T-448/08) (1)

2011/C 55/62

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 313, 6.12.2008.
Order of the General Court of 29 July 2010 — Duta v Court of Justice

(Case T-475/08 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Temporary staff - Recruitment - Post as Legal Secretary - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

(2010/C 288/77)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Radu Duta (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Krieg, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: initially by M. Schauss, then by A. Placco, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 4 September 2008 in Case F-103/07 Duta v Court of Justice, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Radu Dutashall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 164/24

Order of the General Court of 17 April 2013 — vwd Vereinigte Wirtschaftsdienste v Commission

(Case T-353/08) (1)

2013/C 164/41

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 109/11

Order of the General Court of 14 February 2012 — AJD Tuna v Commission

(Case T-329/08) (1)

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 - Recovery plan for bluefin tuna - Setting of TACs for 2008 - Act of general application - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissible)

2012/C 109/25

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: AJD Tuna Ltd (St Paul's Bay, Malta) (represented by: J. Refalo, R. Mastroianni and M. Annoni, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008 establishing emergency measures as regards purse seiners fishing for bluefin tuna in the Atlantic Ocean, east of longitude 45° W, and in the Mediterranean Sea (OJ 2008 L 155, p. 9).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. AJD Tuna Ltd is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 272, 25.10.2008.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 233/18

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 10 July 2009 — TerreStar Europe v Commission

(Case T-196/09 R)

(Application for interim measures - Decision on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services - Application for suspension of operation of the measure and interim relief - No urgency)

2009/C 233/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TerreStar Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Olofsson, lawyer and J. Killick, Barrister)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Braun, A. Nijenhuis, K. Platteau and D. Van Liedekerke, lawyers)

Re:

In essence, application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2009 L 149, p. 65).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 141/42

Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 April 2009 — Cachuera v OHIM — Gelkaps (Ayanda)

(Case T-43/09) (1)

(Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 141/90

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: La Cachuera, SA (Misiones, Argentina) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Gelkaps GmbH (Pritzwalk, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2008 (Case RE 87/2008-2), relating to opposition proceedings between La Cachuera, SA and Gelkaps GmbH

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action.

2. Orders La Cachuera, SA to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 51/48

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2009 — Balfe and Others v Parliament

(Case T-219/09) (1)

2010/C 51/86

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed in part from the register.

(1) OJ C 205, 29.8.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 24/54

Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 November 2009 — Andersen v Commission

(Case T-87/09) (1)

(State aid - Measures in favour of Danske Statsbaner - Public service obligations - Decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 24/96

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Jørgen Andersen (Ballerup, Denmark) (represented by: M. Nissen, J. Rivas de Andrés and J. Gutiérrez Gisbert, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Martenczuk and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 4776 final of 10 September 2008 to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC in respect of State aid C 41/2008 (ex NN 35/2008), implemented by the Kingdom of Denmark in favour of Danske Statsbaner.

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Jørgen Andersen is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 209/38

Order of the General Court of 3 June 2010 — Z v Commission

(Case T-173/09) (1)

(Access to documents - Inadmissibility - Injunction)

2010/C 209/59

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Z (Hannoversch Münden, Germany) (represented by: C. Grau and N. Jäger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, V. Bottka and R. Sauer, agents)

Re:

Require the Commission, first, to indicate to the applicant, by granting it access the file of the procedure in Case COMP/39.406 (Tuyaux marins) and in particular by making available a copy of Commission's decision of 28 January 2009 imposing a fine, if the applicant is mentioned by name in that decision and, if so, to state the context in which its name is mentioned, second, to remove, in a manner to be specified after the granting of access to the file, the mention of its name in the Commission's decision of 28 January 2009 and, third, not to mention it by name and refrain from making any reference to its name in the non-confidential version of the decision of 28 January 2009.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismissed the action as inadmissible.

2. Orders Z to pay the costs, including those of the application for interim measures

(1) OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 134/50

Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Berenschot Groep v Commission

(Case T-428/09) (1)

2010/C 134/83

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/58

Order of the General Court of 28 October 2010 — Agriconsulting Europe v Commission

(Case T-443/09) (1)

()

2010/C 346/113

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 274/30

Order of the General Court of 24 August 2010 — Pineapple Trademarks v OHIM — Dalmau Salmons (KUSTOM)

(Case T-272/09) (1)

()

2010/C 274/45

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.
2.

The obligation on the applicant, 1. garantovaná a.s., to provide the European Commission with a bank guarantee in order to avoid immediate recovery of the fine imposed on it by Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2009) 5791 final of 22 July 2009, relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.396 — Calcium carbide and magnesium based reagents for the steel and gas industries) is suspended until the earlier of the following two events occurs: — maturing of the long-term loans on 11 July 2012, — delivery of the judgment bringing the main proceedings to an end, provided that: — from notification of this order, the applicant does not transfer, either directly or indirectly, its shares in its subsidiary G1 Investments Ltd without the Commission’s prior authorisation; — within a period of one month from notification of this order, the applicant provides to the President of the General Court a written agreement pursuant to which neither its subsidiary G1 Investments nor G1 Investments’ subsidiary, Bounty Commodities Ltd, may transfer their assets to a third party without the Commission’s prior authorisation; — upon notification of this order, the applicant pays to the Commission the sum of EUR 2.1 million; — within a period of one month from notification of this order, then every three months until delivery of judgment in the main action, and upon every event which might have an effect on its future ability to pay the fine imposed, the applicant provides the Commission with a written report on the development of its assets, and more specifically its long-term investments.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/22

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2010 — General Bearing v OHIM (GENERAL BEARING CORPORATION)

(Case T-394/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark GENERAL BEARING CORPORATION - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 55/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: General Bearing Corp. (West Nyack, New York, United States) (represented by: A. Dellmeier-Beschorner, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Manea, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 July 2009 (Case R 73/2009-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign GENERAL BEARING CORPORATION as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

2. General Bearing Corp. is to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/20

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2011 — Mugraby v Council and Commission

(Case T-292/09) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Failure of the Council and the Commission to adopt measures against the Republic of Lebanon - Alleged violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights and the Association Agreement between the Community and the Republic of Lebanon - Manifest inadmissibility - Actions for damages - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2011/C 319/42

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Muhamad Mugraby (Beirut, Lebanon) (represented by: J. Regouw and L. Spigt, lawyers)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro, B. Driessen and E. Finnegan, Agents) and European Commission (represented by: C. Tufvesson and S. Boelaert, Agents)

Re:

Action for failure to act seeking a declaration that the Council and the Commission unlawfully omitted to take a decision on the applicant’s request concerning the adoption of measures against the Republic of Lebanon on account of the alleged violation by the latter of the applicant’s fundamental rights and the Association Agreement concluded between European Community and its Member States of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon of the other part, and an action for damages seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result those institutions’ failure to act.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed;

2. Mr Muhamad Mugraby is to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 238/35

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2011 — Gemmi Furs v OHIM — Lemmi-Fashion (GEMMI)

(Case T-522/09) (1)

2011/C 238/61

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 209/7

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2012 — La City v OHIM — Bücheler and Ewert (citydogs)

(Case T-444/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Appointment of a new representative - Applicant’s failure to act - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 209/11

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: La City (La Courneuve, France) (represented initially by: S. Bénoliel-Claux, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: S. Schäffner and R. Pethke, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Andreas Bücheler and Konstanze Ewert (Engelskirchen, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 August 2009 (Case R 233/2008-1) relating to opposition proceedings between (1) La City and (2) Mr Andreas Bücheler and Ms Konstanze Ewert.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. La City, the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Mr Andreas Bücheler and Ms Konstanze Ewert shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/42

Order of the General Court of 2 December 2011 — Bard v OHIM — Braun Melsungen (PERFIX)

(Case T-342/09) (1)

2012/C 32/83

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/31

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2014 — France v Commission

(Case T-79/09) (1)

((State aid - Framework system of activities carried out by agricultural inter-trade organisations recognised in France in favour of the members of the represented agricultural industries - Financing by compulsory voluntary contributions - Decision classifying the aid scheme as compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 112/41

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented initially by: E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and A.-L. Vendrolini, subsequently by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and J. Gstalter, and lastly by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, and subsequently by B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008 in respect of State aid No 561/2008 relating to the framework system of activities carried out by agricultural inter-trade organisations recognised in France in favour of the members of the represented agricultural industries.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 71/27

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2013 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

(Joined Cases T-445/09 and T-448/09) (1)

2013/C 71/42

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 134/36

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — SNF v ECHA

(Case T-1/10 R)

(Proceedings for interim measures - REACH - Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern - Application for suspension of operation of the measure and for interim relief - No urgency)

2010/C 134/62

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: SNF SAS (Andrézieux-Bouthéon, France) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkila and W. Broere, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision identifying acrylamide as a substance of very high concern stated to have been adopted by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) on 7 December 2009 pursuant to Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/15

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2010 — IDIAP Foundation v Commission

(Case T-286/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration actions - Letter confirming the findings of a financial audit - Application for suspension of operation and for interim measures - No urgency)

2010/C 260/20

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: IDIAP Research Institute Foundation (Martigny, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Chapus-Rapin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and A. Sauka, Agents)

Re:

Essentially, application for suspension of operation of the Commission’s letter of 11 May 2010 confirming the findings of the audit concerning the breakdowns of costs submitted by the applicant, in respect of the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007 as regards the Amida project and in respect of the period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2007 as regards the Bacs and Dirac projects.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 209/39

Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — COLT Télécommunications France v Commission

(Case T-79/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network - Compensation for public service costs - Decision finding that the notified measure does not constitute aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

2010/C 209/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: COLT Télécommunications France SAS (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Debroux, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission (represented by B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2009) 7426 final of 30 September 2009 on a plan to grant compensation for public service costs of EUR 59 million for the establishment and operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network in the department of Hauts-de-Seine (France).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/23

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Meister v OHIM

(Case T-48/10 P) (1)

(Appeals - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2008 promotion procedure - Decision awarding points in the promotion procedure - Mention of points accumulated in previous promotion procedures - Distortion of the facts - Burden of costs - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 55/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Herbert Meister (Muchamiel, Spain) (represented by: H.-J. Zimmermann, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and E. Winter, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 November 2009 in Case F-17/09 Meister v OHIM ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and I-A-2-0000, seeking for that order to be set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Herbert Meister is ordered to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/43

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2010 — Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro v Commission

(Case T-353/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Financial assistance - Debit note for recovery of financial assistance - Application for suspension of execution - Failure to have regard to formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 346/86

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: E. Tzannini, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Sauka, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of execution of a debit note issued by the Commission on 22 July 2010 for the recovery of the sum of EUR 109 415,20 paid in the context of financial assistance in support of a medical research project.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed;