ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Case T-203/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 3 May 2018 — VQ v ECB (Application for interim measures — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Tasks conferred on the ECB by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Powers of the ECB — Specific supervision powers — Administrative penalties — Publication — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency)

Order of the President of the General Court of 3 May 2018 — VQ v ECB

(Case T-203/18 R)

‛(Application for interim measures — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Tasks conferred on the ECB by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Powers of the ECB — Specific supervision powers — Administrative penalties — Publication — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency)’

Parties

Applicant: VQ (represented by: G. Cahill, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Koupepidou, E. Yoo and M. Puidokas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking a suspension of operation of Decision ECB-SSM-2018-ESSAB-4, SNC 2016-0026 of the Governing Council of the ECB of 14 March 2018 relating to a pecuniary penalty and the publication thereof on the ECB’s website.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected;
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2018 — Cabell v EUIPO — Zorro Productions (ZORRO)

(Case T-96/18) (1)

(2018/C 436/91)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 7 September 2018 — Robert v Conseil national de l’ordre des pharmaciens

(Case T-362/18 R)

((Interim measures - Dismissal of the main action - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 399/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alain Robert (Le Mans, France) (represented by: J.-M. Viala, lawyer)

Defendant: Conseil national de l’ordre des pharmaciens

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of the decision of the French Conseil national de l’ordre des pharmaciens of 3 October 2017, upheld by the French Conseil d’État by judgment of 7 February 2018, prohibiting the applicant from practicing as a pharmacist for one year.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGC PARTNERS)

(Case T-520/18) (1)

(2019/C 65/63)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 392, 29.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Novenco Building & Industry v EUIPO — Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) (NOVENCO)

(Case T-45/18) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark NOVENCO - Earlier EU word mark Novenco - Cancellation of the international registration - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/90)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Novenco Building & Industry A/S (Næstved, Denmark) (represented by: A. Rasmussen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) Co. Ltd (Beijing, China) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Re:

First, an action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2017 (Case R 2354/2016-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Novenco Building & Industry and Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) and, second, a cross-claim made against that same decision.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the main action or on the cross-claim.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.
Order of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Brunke v Commission

(Case T-258/18) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Deadline for bringing an action - Starting point - No invitation to act - Second invitation to act - Manifest inadmissibility - Application of a declaratory nature - Application for interim measures - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)

(2019/C 131/58)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Lothar Brunke (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Schniebel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and H. Støvlbæk, acting as Agents)

Re:

Principally, an application for a declaration establishing ‘the discriminatory effect’ of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22) and, in the alternative, first, an application, in essence, for an interim measure to be directed against the Commission and, secondly, an application under Article 265 TFEU for a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to follow up on the applicant’s letters of 6 June and 27 December 2017.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed in part due to the Court’s manifest lack of jurisdiction to hear the action and in part because it is manifestly inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament.

3. Mr Lothar Brunke shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The Council shall bear its own costs relating to its application to intervene.

5. The Parliament shall bear its own costs relating to its application to intervene.

(1) OJ CC 276, 6.8.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2019 — Szécsi and Somossy v Commission

(Case T-331/18) (1)

((Action for damages - Law governing the institutions - Failure by the Commission to adopt appropriate measures to ensure compliance, by Hungarian courts, with Article 13 of Directive 2005/29/EC and the relevant national transposition measure - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 93/81)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: István Szécsi (Szeged, Hungary) and Nóra Somossy (Szeged) (represented by: D. Lazar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Bertelmann and N. Ruiz García, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the breach by the Commission of its supervisory obligation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr István Szécsi and Ms Nóra Somossy shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.
Order of the General Court of 25 March 2019 — Abaco Energy and Others v Commission

(Case T-186/18) (1)

(Actions for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme for renewable energies - Preliminary examination procedure - Decision finding the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Action brought by recipients - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 172/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Abaco Energy, SA (Madrid, Spain) and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex (represented by: initially P. Holtrop, P. Kuypers and M. de Wit, and subsequently P. Holtrop, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche, P. Němečková and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 7384 final of 10 November 2017 relating to State aid SA.40348 (2015/NN) implemented by the Kingdom of Spain (Support for electricity generation from renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain or EDP España.

3. Abaco Energy, SA, and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex, shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the applications to intervene.

4. Abaco Energy and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex, the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain and EDP España shall bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 221, 25.6.2018.
Order of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Gollnisch v Parliament

(Case T-375/18) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Institutional law - European Parliament - Work of a delegation outside the European Union - Decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan - List of the persons authorised to participate in an interparliamentary meeting in Japan which did not include the name of the applicant - Period within which an action must be brought - Late submission - Measure not open to challenge - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 139/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch (Villiers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for, primarily, the annulment of the decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan of 20 March 2018, listing the persons who were authorised to participate in an interparliamentary meeting in Japan and, in the alternative, the annulment of two decisions of implied refusal, and, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU, for repair of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that measure.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs as well as those incurred by the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Ayuntamiento de Enguera v Commission

(Case T-602/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Grant agreement concluded under the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) - Reduction of the amount of the grant - Reclassification of the action - Refusal of the applicant - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 230/66)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Ayuntamiento de Enguera (Enguera, Spain) (represented by: J. Palau Navarro, J. Ortiz Ballester and V. Soriano i Piqueras, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s letter of 26 July 2018 confirming its position on the reduction of the amount of the grant awarded under grant agreement LIFE10 ENV/ES/000458 and giving notice of the issue of a recovery order for the sum of EUR 113 408,05.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Ayuntamiento de Enguera shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — Promeco v EUIPO — Aerts (dishes)

(Case T-353/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 213/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Promeco NV (Kortrijk, Belgium) (represented by: H. Hartwig and A. von Mühlendahl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and H. O'Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Aerts NV (Geel, Belgium) (represented by: G. Glas and T. Carmeliet, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 February 2018 (Case R 459/2016–G) relating to invalidity proceedings between Promeco NV and Aerts NV.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Promeco NV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. Aerts NV shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.
Order of the General Court of (Ninth Chamber) of 5 July 2019 — ArcelorMittal Bremen v Commission

(Case T-544/18) (1)

(Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances - Notification of a change in the national allocation table for Germany for the period from 2013 to 2020 - Request to change the national allocation table recorded in the European Union Transaction Log - Action for failure to act - Instruction given during the proceedings by the Commission to the central administration - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 328/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and D. Jacob, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and A. Becker, acting as Agents.)

Re:

Application, principally, pursuant to Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to instruct the central administrator to record in the national allocation table in the European Union Transaction Log (EUTL) the change notified on 8 February 2018 by the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of the applicant’s installation and, in the alternative, an application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the alleged decision adopted by the Commission on 31 August 2018 following the applicant’s letter of formal notice of 14 May 2018.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The claim seeking to ‘reprimand’ the Commission representatives for having produced inaccurate material before the General Court and for having failed to comply with their procedural obligation to present a factually accurate statement is rejected.

3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application by the Federal Republic of Germany for permission to intervene.

4. The Commission shall bear its own costs and those incurred by ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH.

5. The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Fujifilm Recording Media v EUIPO — iTernity (d:ternity)

(Case T-609/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Application for the EU word mark d:ternity - Earlier word mark iTernity - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity before the action was brought - Invalidation of the contested decision - No interest in bringing proceedings - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 246/24)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Fujifilm Recording Media (Kleve, Germany) (represented by: R.-D. Härer, C. Schultze, C. Weber, H. Ranzinger and C. Gehweiler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: iTernity GmbH (Freiburg, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 July 2018 (Case R 2324/2017-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between iTernity and Fujifilm Recording Media.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Nissin Foods Holdings v EUIPO — The GB Foods (Soba JAPANESE FRIED NOODLES)

(Case T-663/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Soba JAPANESE FRIED NOODLES - Absolute ground for invalidity - Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 423/69)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nissin Foods Holdings Co. Ltd (Osaka, Japan) (represented by S. Malynicz QC, G. Messenger, Barrister, K. Gilbert and G. Lodge, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by G. Sakalaitė-Orlovskienė and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: The GB Foods, SA (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by E. Torner Lasalle, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 August 2018 (Case R 111/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between The GB Foods and Nissin Foods Holdings.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Nissin Foods Holdings Co. Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. The GB Foods, SA shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2019 — Shore Capital International v EUIPO — Circle Imperium (The Inner Circle)

(Case T-575/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark The Inner Circle - Earlier EU word mark InnerCircle - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 363/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Shore Capital International Ltd (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and H. O’Neill, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Circle Imperium BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 June 2018 (Case R 1402/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Shore Capital International and Circle Imperium.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Shore Capital International Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — Daimler v Commission

(Case T-751/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Withdrawal of certified CO2 savings - Eco-innovations scheme - Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011 - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory measure - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 77/69)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Daimler AG (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: N. Wimmer, C. Arhold and G. Ollinger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and A. Becker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission letter Ares(2018) 5413709 of 22 October 2018 notifying the withdrawal of CO2 savings achieved by eco-innovations attributed to Daimler AG vehicles fitted with Bosch HED EL 7-150 and 175 plus high efficient alternators.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Daimler AG is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 November 2019 — ZI v Commission

(Case T-618/18) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Cover by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme - Affiliation of the official’s spouse - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 19/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZI (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by J. Van Pottelberge and J. Steele, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by R. Meyer and M. Alver, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of 4 December 2017 of the Commission’s ‘Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements’ (PMO) refusing to grant the applicant’s husband affiliation to the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. ZI shall bear the costs.

(1) OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — PT v EIB

(Case T-418/18) (1)

(2021/C 53/85)

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — ZD v Parliament

(Case T-591/18) (1)

(2020/C 240/47)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2022 — Iccrea Banca v Commission and SRB

(Joined Case T-386/18 and T-400/19) (1)

(2022/C 472/59)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Vital Capital Investments and Others v Council and Others

(Case T-196/18) (1)

(2021/C 252/58)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 August 2019 — Cantieri del Mediterraneo v Commission

(Case T-335/19) (1)

(2019/C 357/54)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 April 2019 — Hankintatukku Arno Latvus v EUIPO — Triaz Group (VIVANIA)

(Case T-4/19) (1)

(2019/C 206/88)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — BigBen Interactive v EUIPO — natcon7 (nacon)

(Case T-287/19) (1)

(2019/C 413/79)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 220, 1.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — Puma v EUIPO (SOFTFOAM)

(Case T-182/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark SOFTFOAM - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 399/87)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 January 2019 (Case R 1399/2018-2), relating to the application for registration of the figurative sign SOFTFOAM as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Puma SE shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.