ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/4

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 May 2016 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Appello di Bari — Italy) — Leonmobili Srl, Gennaro Leone v Homag Holzbearbeitungssysteme GmbH and Others

(Case C-353/15) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 - Article 3(1) and (2) - Insolvency proceedings - International jurisdiction - Centre of a debtor’s main interests - Transfer of a company’s registered office to another Member State - No establishment in the Member State of origin - Presumption that the centre of main interests is the place of the new registered office - Proof to the contrary))

(2016/C 326/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte di Appello di Bari

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Leonmobili Srl, Gennaro Leone

Defendants: Homag Holzbearbeitungssysteme GmbH, Curatela del Fallimento Leonmobili Srl, ICO Srl, Arturo Salice SpA, Grafiche Ricciarelli di Ricciarelli Bernardino, Deutsche Bank SpA, Fida Srl, Elica SpA

Operative part of the order

Article 3(1) of Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that, where a company’s registered office has been transferred from one Member State to another Member State, the court seised, subsequent to that transfer, of an application to open insolvency proceedings in the Member State of origin may disregard the presumption that that company’s centre of main interests is situated at the place of the new registered office and find that the centre of those interests remained, as at the date on which that application was brought before it, in that Member State of origin, although the company no longer had an establishment there, only if it is apparent from other objective evidence, ascertainable by third parties, that, nonetheless, the company’s actual centre of management and supervision and of the management of its interests was still located there at that date.

(1) OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/25

Order of the President of the Court of 12 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — France) — Association nationale des opérateurs détaillants en énergie (ANODE) v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l'Énergie

(Case C-543/15) (1)

(2016/C 279/36)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 343/15

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 July 2016 — Ana Pérez Gutiérrez v European Commission

(Case C-604/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 181 - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Public health - Photographs proposed by the European Commission for the health warnings to be shown on packaging for tobacco products - Unauthorised use of the image of a deceased person))

(2016/C 343/23)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Ana Pérez Gutiérrez (represented by: J. Soler Puebla, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and J. Tomkin, Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mrs Ana Pérez Gutiérrez shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 38, 1.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 343/10

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — H.M. v Agentsia za darzhavna finansova inspektsia (ADFI)

(Case C-129/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public supply contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 1(9) - Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ - Hospital set up to make a profit, whose capital is entirely private - Over 50 % or 30 % of income coming from payments by the public sickness insurance scheme in exchange for the provision of medical services - Article 7(b) - Estimated value of the contract - Threshold not met - Certain cross-border interest - Lack of information - Article 53(2) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 343/13)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad Sofia-grad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: H.M.

Defendant: Agentsia za darzhavna finansova inspektsia (ADFI)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Administrative Court of the City of Sofia, Bulgaria) by decision of 4 March 2015 is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 171, 26.5.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 475/8

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Prekršajni sud u Bjelovaru — Croatia) — Renata Horžić (C-511/15), Siniša Pušić (C-512/15) v Privredna banka Zagreb d.d., Božo Prka

(Joined Cases C-511/15 and C-512/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Agreements concerning credit for consumers - Directive 2008/48/EC - Credit agreement for immovable property - Variable interest rates - Obligations on the creditor - National legislation applicable to agreements existing at the date on which that legislation comes into force - Inapplicability of Directive 2008/48))

(2016/C 475/11)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Prekršajni sud u Bjelovaru

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Renata Horžić (C-511/15), Siniša Pušić (C-512/15)

Defendants: Privredna banka Zagreb d.d., Božo Prka

Operative part of the order

Articles 23 and 30(1) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which require the creditor, on pain of criminal penalties, to comply with obligations concerning variable interest rates in respect of credit agreements existing at the date on which those provisions came into force, since those credit agreements fall outside the material scope of that directive and, furthermore, those obligations do not constitute an implementation of that directive.

(1) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 22 September 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Austria, supported by: Federal Republic of Germany, Czech Republic

(Case C-1/15) (1)

(2016/C 454/35)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 374/23

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 14 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Umweltverband WWF Österreich v Landeshauptmann von Tirol

(Case C-663/15) (1)

(2017/C 374/33)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/31

Order of the President of the Court of 23 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Zamora — Spain) — Javier Ángel Rodríguez Sánchez v Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria SAU (Banco CEISS)

(Case C-381/15) (1)

(2017/C 112/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale di Milano — Italy) — Stanleybet Malta Ltd, Mario Stoppani v Agenzia delle dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio dei Monopoli per la Lombardia

(Case C-141/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services - Single tax on betting and pools - Tax liability of national intermediaries transmitting gambling data on behalf of operators established in another Member State - Insufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory background to the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 454/28)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Regionale di Milano

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Stanleybet Malta Ltd, Mario Stoppani

Defendant: Agenzia delle dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio dei Monopoli per la Lombardia

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria regionale di Milano (Milan Regional Tax Court, Italy), by decision of 29 September 2015, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 191 of 30.5.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/5

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Cagliari — Italy) — Salumificio Murru SpA v Autotrasporti di Marongiu Remigio

(Case C-121/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 101 TFEU - Road transport - Price of road haulage services for hire or reward which may not be lower than the minimum operating costs - Competition - Fixing of costs by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport))

(2016/C 326/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Cagliari

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Salumificio Murru SpA

Defendant: Autotrasporti di Marongiu Remigio

Operative part of the order

Article 101 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 4(3) TEU, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, pursuant to which the price of road haulage services for hire or reward may not be lower than minimum operating costs fixed by a national administration.

(1) OJ C 200, 6.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 104/23

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 January 2017 — d.d. Synergy Hellas Anonymi Emporiki Etaireia Parochis Ypiresion Pliroforikis v Commission

(Case C-45/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - ‘Multi-level patient-specific artery and artherogenesis model for outcome prediction, decision support treatment, and virtual hand-on training (ARTreat) contract’, concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Termination of that contract due to irregularities committed in the performance of another contract concluded with the European Commission - Good faith - Legitimate expectation the contract would not be terminated))

(2017/C 104/33)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellant: d.d. Synergy Hellas Anonymi Emporiki Etaireia Parochis Ypiresion Pliroforikis (represented by: K. Damis, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. d.d. Synergy Hellas Anonymi Emporiki Etaireia Parochis Ypiresion Pliroforikis is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 98, 14.03.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 86/22

Order of the President of the Court of 21 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — FMS Wertmanagement AöR v Heta Asset Resolution AG

(Case C-394/16) (1)

(2017/C 086/29)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.
1.

The combined provisions of Article 161(5) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code and of Article 788 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 430/2010 of 20 May 2010, must be interpreted as meaning that a seller established in the customs territory of the European Union is considered to be an exporter, within the meaning of the former provision, in the event that, following the conclusion of a contract for the sale of the goods in question, the ownership of those goods is transferred to a purchaser established outside that customs territory.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/14

Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — Kärntner Ausgleichszahlungs-Fonds v Österreichische Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA)

(Case C-309/16) (1)

(2017/C 129/21)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/28

Order of the President of the Court of 26 April 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo no 1 — Santa Cruz de Tenerife — Spain) — Dragados SA v Cabildo Insular de Tenerife

(Case C-324/16) (1)

(2017/C 283/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/7

Order of the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 — Proforec Srl v European Commission

(Case C-176/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Registration of the name ‘Focaccia di Recco col formaggio (IPG)’ - Lack of legal interest in bringing proceedings))

(2017/C 202/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Proforec Srl (represented by: G. Durazzo, M. Mencoboni and G. Pescatore, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by: F. Moro and J. Guillem Carrau, Agents, and subsequently by: F. Moro, Agent)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Proforec Srl shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 191, 30.5.2016
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/5

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ministarstvo pomorstva, prometa i infrastrukture — Uprava zračnog prometa, elektroničkih komunikacija i pošte — Croatia) — Hrvatska agencija za civilno zrakoplovstvo v Air Serbia A.D. Beograd, Dane Kondić

(Case C-476/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Whether the body making a reference is a ‘court or tribunal’ - Independence - Manifest Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling))

(2018/C 032/06)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Ministarstvo pomorstva, prometa i infrastrukture — Uprava zračnog prometa, elektroničkih komunikacija i pošte

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hrvatska agencija za civilno zrakoplovstvo

Defendant: Air Serbia A.D. Beograd, Dane Kondić

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Ministarstvo pomorstva, prometa i infrastrukture — Uprava zračnog prometa, elektroničkih komunikacija i pošte (Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport and Infrastructure — Directorate for Air Transport, Electronic Communications and Postal Services, Croatia), by decision of 26 August 2016, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 424/14

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Stephen Fisher, Anne Fisher, Peter Fisher v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

(Case C-192/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 355(3) TFEU - Status of Gibraltar - Article 49 TFEU - Article 63 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Free movement of capital - Purely internal situation))

(2017/C 424/20)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Stephen Fisher, Anne Fisher, Peter Fisher

Defendants: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Intervening parties: Her Majesty’s Government of Gibraltar

Operative part of the order

Article 355(3) TFEU, in conjunction with Article 49 TFEU or Article 63 TFEU, is to be interpreted as meaning that the exercise of the freedom of establishment or of free movement of capital by British nationals between the United Kingdom and Gibraltar constitutes, as a matter of EU law, a situation confined in all respects within a single Member State.

(1) OJ C 200, 6.6.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 7 June 2018 — Guccio Gucci SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Guess? IP Holder LP

(Case C-675/16 P) (1)

(2018/C 341/13)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/17

Order of the President of the Court of 16 February 2018 — Council of the European Union v PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia, PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia, European Commission, European Biodiesel Board (EBB)

(Case C-603/16 P) (1)

(2018/C 190/24)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 30, 31.1.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/10

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Basilicata — Italy) — Olympus Italia Srl v Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico — Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (CROB) di Rionero in Vulture

(Case C-486/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 4 - Threshold amount for public contracts - Contracts which may have some cross-border interest - Request manifestly inadmissible))

(2018/C 032/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Basilicata

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Olympus Italia Srl

Defendant: Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico — Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (CROB) di Rionero in Vulture

Other party: Crimo Italia Srl

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Basilicata (Administrative Court for the Basilicata Region, Italy) by decision of 22 July 2017, received at the Court on 10 August 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/11

Order of the President of the Court of 22 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Michael Siegberg v TUIfly GmbH

(Case C-276/17) (1)

(2018/C 013/17)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/20

Order of the President of the Court of 7 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — British American Tobacco (Germany) GmbH v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg

(Case C-439/17) (1)

(2018/C 190/34)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 142/19

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2018 — HB and Others v European Commission

(Case C-336/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Law governing the institutions - European citizens’ initiative ‘Ethics for Animals and Kids’ - Protection of stray animals - Psychological effects on adults and children - Refusal to register the initiative for manifest lack of powers on the part of the European Commission - Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - Article 4(2)(b) - Article 4(3)))

(2018/C 142/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellants: HB, Robert Coates Smith, Hans Joachim Richter, Carmen Arsene, Magdalena Anna Kuropatwinska, Christos Yiapanis, Nathalie Louise Klinge (represented by: P. Brockmann, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. HB, Robert Coates Smith, Hans Joachim Richter, Carmen Arsene, Magdalena Anna Kuropatwinska, Christos Yiapanis and Nathalie Louise Klinge, on the one hand, and the European Commission, on the other hand, shall bear their own respective costs.

(1) OJ C 283, 28.8.2017.
Case C-71/17: Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 22 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — David Vicente Fernandes v Gabinete Português de Carta Verde

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 22 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — David Vicente Fernandes v Gabinete Português de Carta Verde

(Case C-71/17) ( 1 )

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.
Case C-327/17 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 April 2018 — Cryo-Save AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG (Appeal — European Union trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 April 2018 — Cryo-Save AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG

(Case C-327/17 P) ( 1 )

‛(Appeal — European Union trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)’

Parties

Appellant: Cryo-Save AG (represented by: C. Onken, Rechtsanwältin)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Hanf, Agent), MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG (represented by: A. Thünken, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the present appeal.

2. Cryo-Save AG shall pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the present proceedings.

3. Cryo-Save AG and MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG shall bear their own costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 330, 2.10.2017.