ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/24

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 June 2017 — Jalkh v Parliament

(Case T-27/17 R)

((Interim measures - Institutional law - Member of the European Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Waiver of the parliamentary immunity of a Member of the European Parliament - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency))

(2017/C 269/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-François Jalkh (Gretz-Armainvillers, France) (represented initially by J.-P. Le Moigne, and subsequently by M. Ceccaldi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by M. Dean and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of the decision of the Parliament of 22 November 2016 concerning the waiver of Mr Jalkh’s immunity in view of the judicial investigation (No 14142000183) open before the tribunal de grande instance de Nanterre (Court of First Instance, Nanterre, France).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 195/30

Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 21 April 2017 — Post Telecom v EIB

(Case T-158/17 R)

((Interim measures - Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision of communication services via a metropolitan area network for the buildings and offices of the European Investment Bank Group in Luxembourg - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency))

(2017/C 195/42)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Post Telecom SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Thewes, C. Saettel and T. Chevrier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: T. Gilliams, P. Kiiver and C. Solazzo, acting as Agents, assisted by M. Belmessieri and B. Schutyser, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of the decision of the EIB of 6 January 2017 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant for lot No 1 of call for tenders OP-1305, entitled ‘Metropolitan area network and wide area network communication services for the European Investment Bank Group’, and of the decision to award that lot to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 15 March 2017 in Case T-158/17 R is revoked.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 392/31

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO (Here Global (h)

(Case T-40/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 392/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Habermaaß GmbH AG (Bad Rodach, Germany) (represented by: U. Blumenröder, H. Gauß and E. Bertram, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J.F. Crespo Carrillo and M. Tóhatí, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Here Global BV (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented by: J. Erkkilä, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 October 2016 (Case R 53/2016-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Here Global BV and Habermaaß GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Habermaaß GmbH and Here Global BV shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 86, 20.3.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 293/40

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2017 — DQ and Others v Parliament

(Case T-38/17) (1)

(2017/C 293/52)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 104, 3.4.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 94/26

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2018 — Cristalfarma v EUIPO – Novartis (ILLUMINA)

(Case T-157/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark ILLUMINA - Revocation of the contested decision - Action rendered devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 094/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cristalfarma Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. King and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Novartis AG (Basle, Switzerland)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2017 (Case R 1187/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Novartis and Cristalfarma.

Operative part of the order

1. The request made by Cristalfarma Srl for a stay of the proceedings is rejected;

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action;

3. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Cristalfarma;

4. Novartis AG shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/41

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 November 2017 — Nexans France and Nexans v Commission

(Case T-423/17 R)

((Interim relief - Competition - Power cables - Rejection of the request for confidential treatment of certain information contained in a decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency))

(2018/C 022/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Nexans France (Courbevoie, France), Nexans (Courbevoie) (represented by: G. Forwood, A. Rogers, A. Oh and M. Powell, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking, first, a suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2017) 3051 final of 2 May 2017 relating to a request for confidential treatment (Case COMP/AT.39610 — Power Cables) in so far as that request is refused in respect of the material seized from the applicants and another economic operator and, second, an order requiring the Commission to refrain from publishing a version of its Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 (Case COMP/AT.39610 — Power Cables), which contains that material.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.

2. The order of 12 July 2017, Nexans France and Nexans v Commission (T-423/17 R) is set aside.
Case T-676/17: Order of the General Court of 16 April 2018 — UN v Commission

Order of the General Court of 16 April 2018 — UN v Commission

(Case T-676/17) ( 1 )

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 152/59

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2018 — Ferri v ECB

(Case T-641/17) (1)

(2018/C 152/72)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.
Case T-487/17: Order of the General Court of 19 June 2018 — UE v Commission

Order of the General Court of 19 June 2018 — UE v Commission

(Case T-487/17) ( 1 )

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.
Case T-465/17: Order of the General Court of 18 May 2018 — VKR Holding v EUIPO (VELUX) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark VELUX — Claiming the seniority of the earlier national word mark VELUX — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

Order of the General Court of 18 May 2018 — VKR Holding v EUIPO (VELUX)

(Case T-465/17) ( 1 )

‛(EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark VELUX — Claiming the seniority of the earlier national word mark VELUX — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)’

Parties

Applicant: VKR Holding A/S (Søborg, Denmark) (represented by: J. Heebøll, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 May 2017 (Case R 1927/2016-2) relating to an application claiming seniority of the identical national (Estonian) trade mark for the word mark VELUX, registered as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — TE v Commission

(Case T-392/17 R)

((Interim measures - Dismissal of the action in the main proceedings - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 399/47)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: TE (represented by J. Bartončík, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by J. Baquero Cruz and Z. Malůšková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of the decision to open an external investigation, carried out by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), [confidential], (1) concerning the applicant as a person concerned and relating to [confidential]

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.

2. TE shall pay the costs.

(1) Confidential information omitted.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — The Scotch Whisky Association v EUIPO — José Estévez (JOHN COR)

(Case T-469/17) (1)

(2018/C 319/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-506/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2018/C 436/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Rami Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/917 of 29 May 2017, amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2017 L 139, p. 62), and its subsequent implementing acts, insofar as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Rami Makhlouf is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Nexans France and Nexans v Commission

(Case T-423/17) (1)

(2018/C 427/136)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.
Order of the General Court of 14 November 2018 — Bruel v Commission and Others

(Case T-793/17) (1)

((Action for annulment and damages - Measure adopted by the Head of Section of the EU Delegation to Algeria in the context of a public procurement procedure for the provision of services - Decision requesting the replacement of the applicant as an expert - Termination of the agreement between the successful tendering company and the applicant following that decision - No capacity as defendant - Act not open to challenge - No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Causal link - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2019/C 44/87)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Damien Bruel (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Hansen, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu, acting as Agent), European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents), European Union Delegation to Algeria

Re:

First, application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the letter of 25 September 2017 requesting the replacement of the applicant as an expert in the context of an agreement for the provision of services concluded between the successful tendering company and the applicant and, secondly, application pursuant to Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Damien Bruel shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2018 — Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft v EUIPO — C & C IP (T)

(Case T-401/17) (1)

(2019/C 44/111)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 April 2019 — Boehringer Ingelheim International v Commission

(Case T-191/17) (1)

(2019/C 206/86)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 178, 6.6.2017.
Order of the General Court of 11 December 2018 — CheapFlights International v EUIPO — Momondo Group (Cheapflights)

(Case T-565/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Cheapflights - Referral of the trade mark application to the examiner for examination of the absolute grounds for refusal - Challenge by the proprietor of the earlier mark - Grounds of the contested decision containing an assessment of the validity of the earlier mark - Challenge by the proprietor of the earlier mark - Partial inadmissibility - Incidental submissions made on the basis on Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 - Withdrawal of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - No need to adjudicate in part))

(2019/C 65/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CheapFlights International Ltd (Speenoge, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Momondo Group Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 June 2017 (R 1893/2011-G) relating to opposition proceedings between CheapFlights International and Momondo Group.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it is directed against the closure of the appeal proceedings by the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 June 2017 (Case R 1893/2011-G) with regard to the goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35 and 42 in respect of which the Opposition Division had rejected the opposition of CheapFlights International Ltd.

2. The action is dismissed as inadmissible as to the remainder.

3. CheapFlights International shall pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by EUIPO.

4. EUIPO shall bear half of its own costs.

(1) OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2022 — Van Haren Schoenen v Commission

(Case T-155/17) (1)

(2023/C 45/44)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — CX v Commission

(Case T-605/17) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Decision of the Commission to recover salaries paid to the applicant - Debit note ordering recovery of the sums at issue - Replacement of the contested measures in the course of the proceedings - Abandonment of any measure seeking the recovery of the sums at issue - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 423/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the measures seeking recovery of the salaries paid for the months of November 2013 to October 2016.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.
Order of the President of the General Court of 20 July 2018 — CdT v EUIPO

(Case T-417/18 R)

((Interim measures - Law governing the institutions - Translation services required for the functioning of EUIPO - Use of external contractors - Application for interim measures - No urgency))

(2018/C 381/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Translation Centre for the bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: J. Rikkert and M. M. Garnier, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: N. Bambara and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, first, for the suspension of operation of EUIPO’s decisions relating to measures intended to make it possible to use service providers other than the CdT for the translation services required for its functioning and, secondly, for an order requiring EUIPO to publish in the Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union a notice suspending its call for tenders concerning the provision of translation services and not to sign contracts relating to that call for tenders.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 July 2018 — Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v REA

(Case T-104/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Grant agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Recovery of the sums paid - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

(2018/C 301/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation (San Sebastián, Spain) (represented by: P. Palacios Pesquera and M. Rius Coma, lawyers)

Defendant: Research Executive Agency (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou and V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and by J. Rivas Andrés, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of operation of the REA’s decision to seek full repayment of the grant awarded for the Food-Watch project.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 November 2018 — Aliança — Vinhos de Portugal v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (ALIANÇA VINHOS DE PORTUGAL)

(Case T-222/18) (1)

(2019/C 44/114)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2018 — Enterprise Holdings v EUIPO (E PLUS)

(Case T-339/18) (1)

(2018/C 427/140)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 6 November 2018 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinGas)

(Case T-595/18) (1)

(2019/C 72/61)

Language of the case: German

The President of the General Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
Order of the General Court of 28 November 2018 — Euronet Consulting v Commission

(Case T-350/18) (1)

((Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Partial annulment of the contested measure - Amending decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 54/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Euronet Consulting EEIG (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Peeters and R. van Cleemput, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà, T. Ramopoulos and A. Aresu, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission decision, notified to the applicant by letter of 26 March 2018, to reject the tender for Lot 2, submitted by the consortium of which the applicant is the leader, in the call for tenders EuropeAid/138778/DH/SER/MULTI, entitled ‘Framework contract for the implementation of external aid 2018 (FWC SIEA 2018) 2017/S 128-260026’ and to award the contract to ten other tenderers.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 — ND (*1) and OE (*1) v Commission

(Case T-581/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Discrimination alleged against European officials and other national residents concerning the method of calculating the net remuneration determining the tariff of certain social benefits - Coordination of social security systems - Decision to take no further action on a complaint - Failure to bring infringement proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 139/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: ND (*1) and OE (*1) (represented by: A. Bove, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision contained in the Commission letter of 27 July 2018, notified to the applicants on 30 July 2018, by which the Commission decided to take no further action on their complaint against the City of Luxembourg, the State of Luxembourg and the Administrative Court of Luxembourg.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. ND (*1) and OE (*1) are ordered to pay the costs.

(*1) Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1) OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — Lillelam v EUIPO — Pfaff (LITTLE LAMB)

(Case T-18/18) (1)

(2019/C 122/38)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.