ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 17 November 2020 — González Calvet v SRB

(Case T-257/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Decision refusing to grant financial compensation to the shareholders and creditors concerned - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 19/55)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Ramón González Calvet (Barcelona, Spain) and Joan González Calvet (Barcelona) (represented by: P. Molina Bosch, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: S. Branca, J. King, L. Forestier and E. Muratori, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, F. Louis, V. Del Pozo Espinosa De Los Monteros and L. Hesse, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of SRB Decision SRB/EES/2020/52 of 17 March 2020 determining whether compensation needs to be granted to the shareholders and creditors in respect of which the resolution actions concerning Banco Popular Español S.A. have been effected.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by the Kingdom of Spain.

3. Orders Mr Ramón González Calvet and Mr Joan González Calvet to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain.

4. Orders Messrs González Calvet, the SRB and the Kingdom of Spain to each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain.

(1) OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 September 2020 — IMI 2 Joint Undertaking v CHS

(Case T-53/20) (1)

(2020/C 378/57)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 31 December 2020 — ExxonMobil Production Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-731/20 R)

(Interim measures - Directive 2003/87/EC - Decision 2011/278/EU - System for greenhouse gas emissions allowance trading - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 62/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH (Hanover, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and J. Hoss, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 279 TFEU and Article 156 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, seeking that the Commission be ordered to transfer 7 428 258 emission allowances to the account of the installation of the applicant by 31 December 2020 at the latest.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 19 November 2020 — Comune di Stintino v Commission

(Case T-174/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Grant agreement in the framework of the funding instrument for the environment (LIFE+) - Debit Note - Act which is part of a purely contractual framework and from which it is inseparable - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 28/80)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Comune di Stintino (Italy) (represented by: G. Machiavelli, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. De Dominicis, Agent)

Re:

Application brought under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the alleged decision set out in the letter Ares(2020) 734033 of the Commission, of 5 February 2020, on the reduction of the grant awarded to the applicant under the LIFE10 NAT/IT/244 project and on the repayment of the excess sum already paid; of Debit Note No 3242002652 of the Commission, of 24 February 2020, requesting that the applicant pay it EUR 447 078,63; of the alleged decision set out in the letter Ares(2019) 6551262 of the Commission, of 23 October 2019, relating to the proportion of the ineligible costs; and of all preliminary, consequential or connected acts or measures.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Comune di Stintino shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 175, 25.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 February 2021 — Sam McKnight v EUIPO — Carolina Herrera (COOL GIRL)

(Case T-176/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 138/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sam McKnight Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Carolina Herrera Ltd (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: E. Stoyanov Edissonov and I. Robledo McClymont, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 January 2020 (Case R 689/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Carolina Herrera and Sam McKnight.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sam McKnight Ltd and Carolina Herrera Ltd.

(1) OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 January 2021 — Green Power Technologies v Commission and ECSEL Joint Undertaking

(Case T-533/20 R)

(Interim measures - Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Reimbursement of sums paid - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 88/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Green Power Technologies, SL (Bollullos de la Mitación, Spain) (represented by: A. León González and A. Martínez Solís, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents), ECSEL Joint Undertaking (represented by: A. Salaun, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of the operation of debit note No 4440200016 of 17 June 2020 issued by the ECSEL Joint Undertaking for the amount of EUR 200 930,35.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — ZU v Commission

(Case T-462/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Officials - Request for information - Rejection of a complaint - No act adversely affecting the applicant - Action manifestly inadmissible)

(2021/C 242/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio, L. Vernier and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, in the first place, annulment, first, of the Commission’s letter of 5 September 2019 refusing to answer the applicant’s questions and, second, of the Commission’s letter of 6 April 2020 rejecting his complaint and, in the second place, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of those measures.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. ZU shall pay all of the costs.

(1) OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.
Order of the General Court of 12 March 2021 — PNB Banka v ECB

(Case T-50/20) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Insolvency proceedings - Refusal by the ECB to accede to a request from the board of directors of a credit institution that the insolvency administrator of that institution be instructed to grant the lawyer authorised by that board access to the premises, information, staff and resources of that institution - Competence of the author of the act - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 182/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PNB Banka AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta, F. Bonnard and V. Hümpfner, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the ECB’s decision of 19 November 2019 refusing to instruct the applicant’s insolvency administrator to grant the lawyer authorised by the applicant’s board of directors access to its premises, to the information that it holds and to its staff and resources.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to rule on the application to intervene submitted by the Republic of Latvia.

3. PNB Banka AS shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.

4. PNB Banka, the ECB and the Republic of Latvia shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2021 — Novelis v Commission

(Case T-680/20) (1)

(2021/C 289/71)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 May 2021 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Yuneec Europe (Breeze)

(Case T-158/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Breeze - Earlier EU word mark Breeze - Relative ground for refusal - Comparison of the goods - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 263/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch, N. Willich and N. Achilles, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Yuneec Europe GmbH (Kaltenkirchen, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 January 2020 (Case R 470/2020-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Yuneec Europe and TrekStor.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. TrekStor Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 July 2021 — UPTR v Parliament and Council

(Case T-634/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Road transport - Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 - International road haulage market - Cabotage - Trade association - Legal standing - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 412/08)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) (Herstal, Belgium) (represented by: F. Vanden Bogaerde, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: R. van de Westelaken and A. Tamás, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Norberg, L. Vetillard and S. Emmerechts, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Article 2(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 amending Regulations (EC) No 1071/2009, (EC) No 1072/2009 and (EU) No 1024/2012 in order to adapt them to developments in the road transport sector (OJ 2020 L 249, p. 17).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 443, 21.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT9)

(Case T-423/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GT9 - Earlier EU figurative mark GT - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Relevant public - Level of attention - Action manifestly well founded)

(2021/C 310/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1610/2019 4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe and Huawei Technologies.

Operative part of the order

1. The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1610/2019-4) is annulled.

2. EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd.

(1) OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 October 2021 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament

(Case T-613/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Acknowledgement by the Parliament of the election of a Member of the European Parliament as a result of another parliamentary seat becoming vacant - Locus standi - Concept of ‘addressee’ of a decision - Lack of direct concern - No regulatory act of general application - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 502/45)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Oriol Junqueras i Vies (Sant Joan de Vilatorrada, Spain) (represented by: M. Marsal i Ferret, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, T. Lukácsi and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the acknowledgement of the election of Mr Jordi Solé i Ferrando as a Member of the European Parliament replacing the applicant with effect from 3 January 2020, announced by the President of the Parliament in plenary on 23 July 2020.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of Spain.

3. Mr Oriol Junqueras i Vies shall pay the costs.

4. The Kingdom of Spain shall bear the costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 390, 16.11.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 September 2021 — Kühne v Parliament

(Case T-691/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Mobility regime - Request concerning the mobility obligation - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 452/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Verena Kühne (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Schmechel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Darie and B. Schäfer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Parliament’s letter of 17 April 2020, supplemented on 21 April 2020, rejecting the applicant’s request concerning the application of the mobility rules.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Ms. Verena Kühne shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
Order of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Shoe)

(Case T-682/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a shoe - Earlier national and Community designs produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity - Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 - Grounds for invalidity - Lack of novelty - No individual character - Degree of freedom of the designer - No different overall impression - Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 109/29)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH (Feldkirchen bei Graz, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rieker Schuh AG (Thayngen, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Schabenberger, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2020 (Case R 1650/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Legero Schuhfabrik and Rieker Schuh.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 November 2021 — Satabank v ECB

(Case T-494/20) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of less significant credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Specific tasks of the ECB - Refusal to carry out direct prudential supervision - Refusal to give instructions to the Competent Person - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 37/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Satabank plc (St Julians, Malta) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta, F. Bonnard and A. Lefterov, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the ECB’s decision of 15 May 2020 refusing to ensure direct supervision of the applicant and to give instructions to the Competent Person concerning it.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Satabank plc shall pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2022 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-335/20) (1)

(2022/C 463/90)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 February 2022 — OP v Commission

(Case T-736/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 - Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment)

(2022/C 148/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: OP (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 of 5 February 2020 not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list of that competition.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. OP shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2021 — Jalkh v Parliament

(Case T-230/21 R)

(Interim measures - Law governing the institutions - Member of the European Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Waiver of parliamentary immunity - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2021/C 382/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-François Jalkh (Gretz-Armainvilliers, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz and A.-M. Dumbrăvan, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 278 TFEU for suspension of operation of European Parliament decision P9_TA(2021)0092 of 25 March 2021 on the request for waiver of the immunity of the applicant (2020/2110(IMM)).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2021 — Precisis v EUIPO — Easee (EASEE)

(Case T-66/21) (1)

(2021/C 252/67)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Girardi v EUIPO

(Case T-497/21 R)

(Interim relief - EU trade mark - Professional representation - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2021/C 502/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Giovanna Paola Girardi (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: G. Macías Bonilla, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and G. Predonzani, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation, first, of the decision of EUIPO of 14 June 2021 concerning the applicant’s capacity to act as a representative before EUIPO and, secondly, of the part of EUIPO’s Guidelines for examination of European Union trade marks relating to professional representation by Spanish lawyers (Part A, Section 5, Annex 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 July 2021 — ClientEarth v Commission

(Case T-52/21) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Aarhus Convention - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Documents held by the Commission concerning the control system established for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy - Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 412/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ClientEarth AISBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: O.W. Brouwer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Spina and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision of 16 November 2020 rejecting the confirmatory application for access to several documents concerning the control system established for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.