Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Arbos v Commission

(Case C‑615/12 P)

‛Appeal — Action for damages — Grants made for projects financed by the ‘Culture 2000’ programme — Claims for payment of various sums — Content of the application — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded’

1. Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — No such summary — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 120(c); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 24, 27, 32-34, 37, 38)

2. Judicial proceedings — Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings — Conditions — Not applicable to appeals — Inadmissibility — Exceptions (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 127(1); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 48(2)) (see para. 35)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 25 October 2012 in Case T‑161/06 Arbos v Commission by which the General Court dismissed the action against the Commission, seeking payment of, first, the sum of EUR 38 585.42 together with interest at the rate of 12% from 1 January 2001 and the sum of EUR 27 618.91 together with interest at the rate of 12% from 1 March 2003 and, second, of the sum of EUR 26 459.38 excluding VAT in respect of the fees of lawyers instructed during the pre-litigation procedure — Infringement of Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Operative part

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater is ordered to pay the costs.

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Arbos v Commission

(Case C‑615/12 P)

‛Appeal — Action for damages — Grants made for projects financed by the ‘Culture 2000’ programme — Claims for payment of various sums — Content of the application — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded’

1. Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — No such summary — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 120(c); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 24, 27, 32-34, 37, 38)

2. Judicial proceedings — Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings — Conditions — Not applicable to appeals — Inadmissibility — Exceptions (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 127(1); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 48(2)) (see para. 35)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 25 October 2012 in Case T‑161/06 Arbos v Commission by which the General Court dismissed the action against the Commission, seeking payment of, first, the sum of EUR 38 585.42 together with interest at the rate of 12% from 1 January 2001 and the sum of EUR 27 618.91 together with interest at the rate of 12% from 1 March 2003 and, second, of the sum of EUR 26 459.38 excluding VAT in respect of the fees of lawyers instructed during the pre-litigation procedure — Infringement of Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Operative part

1. The appeal is dismissed.