ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 20 September 2018 — Správa železniční dopravní cesty v Commission and INEA

(Case T-815/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - Financial assistance - Project of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks - Preliminary planning services for the new Dresden-Prague high-speed rail line - Decision on eligible costs - Incorrect identification of the defendant - Not directly affected - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/102)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: F. Korbel, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and Z.Malůšková, acting as Agents), Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (represented by: I. Ramallo and I. Barcew, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of INEA’s letter of 11 October 2017 relating to the final financial statement of the eligibility of the sums claimed from the EU financial assistance granted to the project of common interest ‘Services relating to the preliminary planning of a new Dresden-Prague high-speed rail line’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene made by the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland.

3. Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace, shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA).

4. Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace, the Commission, INEA, the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland shall each bear their own costs connected with the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Labiri v EESC

(Case T-256/17) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Psychological harassment - Amicable settlement - Performance of the agreement - Error in law - Error in assessment - Misuse of powers - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2018/C 328/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Vassiliki Labiri (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and M. Troncoso Ferrer and F.-M. Hislaire, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment of EESC’s decision of 23 June 2016‘not to perform one paragraph of the amicable settlement reached by the parties before the Civil Service Tribunal’ in Case F-33/15 and the payment of EUR 250 000 in respect of material and non-material damage.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Vassiliki Labiri shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.
Order of the General Court of 12 November 2018 — Stichting Against Child Trafficking v Commission

(Case T-658/17) (1)

((Action for annulment and for failure to act - Legal person informing OLAF of potentially reprehensible conduct - OLAF’s decision not to open an investigation - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility - Costs - Equity - Article 135(1) of the Rules of Procedure))

(2019/C 44/82)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Stichting Against Child Trafficking (Nijmegen, Netherlands) (represented by: E. Agstner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and C. Tritz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Request on the basis of Articles 263 and 265 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 3 August 2017 not to open an administrative investigation in Case OC/2017/0451 and, second, an order requiring OLAF to open an administrative investigation and, depending on the findings of that investigation, to refer the case to the national law enforcement authorities for the purpose of criminal proceedings, and/or to the institutions of the European Union for the purpose of an administrative procedure.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Stichting Against Child Trafficking shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.
Order of the General Court of 28 September 2018 — Lux-Rehab Non-Profit v Commission
(Case T-710/17) (1)
(Action for annulment — State aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of companies employing 
disabled workers — Preliminary examination procedure — Alleged Commission decisions declaring the aid 
measure compatible with the internal market — Concept of ‘party concerned’ — No individual concern — 
Inadmissibility)
(2018/C 427/97)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: Lux-Rehab Foglalkoztató Non-Profit Kft. (Lux-Rehab Non-Profit Kft.) (Szombathely, Hungary) (represented by: 
L. Szabó, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions that the Commission allegedly adopted 
concerning the complaints SA.29432 — CP 290/2009 — Hungary — Aid for the employment of disabled workers alleged 
to be unlawful due to the discriminatory nature of the legislation and SA. 45498 (FC/2016) — Complaint made by OPS 
Újpest-lift Kft. concerning the State aid granted between 2006 and 2012 to companies employing disabled workers.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Lux-Rehab Foglalkoztató Non-Profit Kft. (Lux-Rehab Non-Profit Kft.) shall pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 437, 18.12.2017.
Order of the General Court of 28 September 2018 — Motex v Commission
(Case T-713/17) (1)
(Action for annulment — State Aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings which 
have employed persons with disabilities — Preliminary review procedure — Decisions allegedly taken by 
the Commission declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market — Concept of party 
concerned — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
(2018/C 427/98)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: Motex Ipari és Szolgáltató Rehabilitációs Kft. (Motex Kft.) (Esztergom-Kertváros, Hungary) (represented by: 
L. Szabó, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)26.11.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 427/73
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2018 — Kanyama v Council

(Case T-145/17) (1)

(2019/C 54/55)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2018 — Danpower Baltic v Commission

(Case T-295/17) (1)

(2019/C 44/109)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 July 2019 — Taminco and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain v EFSA

(Case T-621/17) (1)

(2019/C 357/52)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — PP and Others v EEAS

(Case T-727/17) (1)

(2019/C 103/77)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Nike European Operations Netherlands and Others v Commission

(Case T-351/17) (1)

(2023/C 45/46)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2019 — TestBioTech v Commission

(Case T-173/17) (1)

(2020/C 10/67)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.
Case T-230/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 May 2018 — Czarnecki v Parliament (Interim measures — Law governing the institutions — Vice-President of the European Parliament — Decision of the Parliament to end a Vice-President’s term of office — Application for interim measures — Injunction — Inadmissibility)

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 May 2018 — Czarnecki v Parliament

(Case T-230/18 R)

‛(Interim measures — Law governing the institutions — Vice-President of the European Parliament — Decision of the Parliament to end a Vice-President’s term of office — Application for interim measures — Injunction — Inadmissibility)’

Parties

Applicant: Ryszard Czarnecki (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking, first, a suspension of operation of the decision of the European Parliament of 7 February 2018 approving the early cessation of the applicant’s role as Vice-President of the Parliament and, secondly, an order requiring the Parliament to allow the applicant to remain in office as Vice-President of the Parliament.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — Monster Energy v EUIPO — Nordbrand Nordhausen (BALLER’S PUNCH)

(Case T-134/18) (1)

(2018/C 319/35)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.
Case T-52/18: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2018 — Teollisuuden Voima v Commission

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2018 — Teollisuuden Voima v Commission

(Case T-52/18) ( 1 )

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Labiri v EESC

(Case T-374/18) (1)

(2019/C 44/116)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.
Order of the President of the General Court of 27 August 2018 — Boyer v Wallis and Futuna

(Case T-475/18 R)

((Interim measures - Public contracts - Application for interim measures - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 399/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Boyer (Papeete, France) (represented by T. Dal Farra, lawyer)

Defendant: Territory of the Wallis and Futuna Islands (France)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking, first, suspension of the operation of the decision of the Territory of the Wallis and Futuna Islands by which it rejected the applicant’s tender and awarded the works contract for construction of a commercial marine dock in Leava (France) to another tenderer, and, second, to suspend the signature of the relevant contract.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Shimano Europe (PRO)

(Case T-122/18) (1)

(2019/C 65/62)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.
Order of the President of the General Court of 28 November 2018 — Klyuyev v Council

(Case T-305/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case - No urgency))

(2019/C 44/93)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Andriy Klyuyev (Donetsk, Ukraine) (represented by: B. Kennelly QC, J. Pobjoy, Barrister, R. Gherson and T. Garner, Solicitors)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: P. Mahnič and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the suspension of operation of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 48) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 5), in so far as they apply to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2019 — Intercontinental Exchange Holdings v EUIPO (BRENT)

(Case T-725/18) (1)

(2019/C 131/69)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 January 2019 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Beko (BECON)

(Case T-557/18) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 93/83)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Beko plc (Watford, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2018 (Case R 41/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Beko plc and LG Electronics, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. LG Electronics, Inc. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 March 2019 — Solwindet las Lomas v Commission

(Case T-190/18) (1)

(Actions for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme for renewable energies - Preliminary examination procedure - Decision finding the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Action brought by a recipient - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 172/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Solwindet las Lomas, SL (Girona, Spain) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche, P. Němečková and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 7384 final of 10 November 2017 relating to State aid SA.40348 (2015/NN) implemented by the Kingdom of Spain (Support for electricity generation from renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain or EDP España.

3. Solwindet las Lomas, SL shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the applications to intervene.

4. Solwindet las Lomas, the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain and EDP España shall bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Commission

(Case T-178/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Plant-protection products - Active substance glyphosate - Renewal of inclusion in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 139/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (represented by: A. Bailleux and B. Magarinos Rey, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, A. Lewis, I. Naglis and G. Koleva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2324 of 12 December 2017 renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011(OJ 2017 L 333, p.10).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of Justice Pesticides, the Walloon Region, Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe), Health & Environment Alliance (HEAL), Nature & Progrès Belgique (Nature & Progrès), SomeOfUs, WeMove Europe (WeMove.EU), Monsanto Europe NV/SA, Monsanto Company, Helm AG, Barclay Chemicals Manufacturing Ltd, Albaugh Europe Sàrl, Albaugh TKI D.O.O. and Albaugh UK Ltd.

3. The Région de Bruxelles-Capitale shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

4. The Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, the Commission, Justice Pesticides, the Walloon Region, PAN Europe, HEAL, Nature & Progrès, SomeOfUs, WeMove.EU, Monsanto Europe, Monsanto Company, Helm, Barclay Chemicals Manufacturing, Albaugh Europe, Albaugh TKI D.O.O. and Albaugh UK shall each bear their own costs in relation to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commission

(Case T-734/18 R)

(Interim measures - Biocidal products - Active substance empenthrin - Non-approval - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2019/C 230/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Sumitomo Chemical (UK) plc (London, United Kingdom), Tenka Best, SL (Aiguafreda, Spain) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, lawyer, and V. McElwee, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek and R. Lindenthal, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: L. Van den Broeck and P. Cottin, acting as Agents, and by A. Poppe and E. Jacubowitz, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1251 of 18 September 2018 not approving empenthrin as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 18 (OJ 2018 L 235, p. 24).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 April 2019 — Engel v EUIPO — F. Engel (ENGEL)

(Case T-381/18) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 213/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Engel GmbH (Pfullingen, Germany) (represented by: C. Pfitzer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: F. Engel K/S (Haderslev, Denmark) (represented by: L. Elmgaard Sørensen, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2018 (Case R 1423/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between F. Engel and Engel.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Engel GmbH and F. Engel K/S shall bear their own costs and Engel GmbH shall pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.
Order of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — VodafoneZiggo Group v Commission

(Case T-660/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Electronic communications - Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC - Wholesale provision of fixed access - Joint significant market power - Specific regulatory obligations imposed on operators - Draft measure made accessible by the national regulatory authority - Comments of the Commission - Second phase of the procedure not opened - Act not open to challenge - Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 328/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VodafoneZiggo Group BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: W. Knibbeler and A. Pliego Selie, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and L. Nicolae, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the letter of 30 August 2018 sent by the Commission to the Autoriteit Consument en Markt (Consumers and Markets Authority, Netherlands), the Dutch regulatory authority, containing its comments made pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33), on a draft measure made accessible by that authority (Cases NL/2018/2099 and NL/2018/2100).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of the Netherlands or by T-Mobile Netherlands Holding BV, T-Mobile Netherlands BV, T-Mobile Thuis BV and Tele2 Nederland BV.

3. VodafoneZiggo Group BV shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

4. VodafoneZiggo Group, the Commission, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, T-Mobile Netherlands Holding, T-Mobile Netherlands, T-Mobile Thuis and Tele2 Nederland shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Czarnecki v Parliament

(Case T-230/18) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Member of the European Parliament - Statements made against another Member of Parliament - Early termination of the term of office and duties of the Vice-President of the Parliament - Rights of the defence - Misuse of powers - Equal treatment)

(2019/C 246/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Ryszard Czarnecki (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, S. Seyr and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 7 February 2018 prematurely bringing to an end the applicant’s term of office as Vice-President of the Parliament.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ryszard Czarnecki is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.