ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/51

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2017 — No Limits v EUIPO — Morellato (NO LIMITS)

(Case T-43/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark NO LIMITS - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 283/79)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: No Limits International Investments SA (Bissone, Switzerland) (represented by: F. Canu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Scardocchia and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Morellato SpA (Fratte di Santa Giustina in Colle, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2016 (Case R 2007/2015-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between Morellato and No Limits Investments.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by No Limits International Investments SA.

(1) OJ C 95, 27.3.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 52/44

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2017 — Verband der Deutschen Biokraftstoffindustrie v Commission

(Case T-451/17) (1)

(2018/C 052/60)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.
Case T-227/17: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2017 — Falmouth University v Commission

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2017 — Falmouth University v Commission

(Case T-227/17) ( 1 )

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 166/31

Order of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo v Commission

(Case T-130/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2009/73/EC - Commission decision amending the conditions for exemption from the EU requirements of the rules governing operation of the OPAL pipeline in regard to third-party access and tariff regulation - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 166/40)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Jeżewski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on the review of the conditions for exemption of the OPAL pipeline, granted under Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 57), from the rules on third-party access and tariff regulation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene.

3. Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

4. The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

5. Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo, the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, OPAL Gastransport GmbH & Co. KG and Gazprom Eksport LLC shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 104/42

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — Seco Belgium and Vinçotte v Parliament

(Case T-812/17 R)

((Interim measures - Public procurement - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Withdrawal of the contested act - No need to adjudicate in part - Application for an injunction - No urgency))

(2018/C 104/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Seco Belgium (Brussels, Belgium) Vinçotte (Vilvoorde, Belgium) (represented by: A. Delvaux and R. Simar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: P. López-Carceller and Z. Nagy, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, first, for a suspension of the operation of the decision of the Parliament of 1 December 2017 to reject the applicants’ tender in the tender procedure 06D 20/2017/M005 entitled ‘Assignments to perform inspections and provide technical opinions in the context of construction works, projects and purchases at the European Parliament in Brussels’ and to award the contract to another tenderer, and secondly, for an injunction against the Parliament.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for a suspension of the operation of the decision of the Parliament of 1 December 2017 to reject the tender of Seco Belgium and Vinçotte in the tender procedure 06D 20/2017/M005 entitled ‘Assignments to perform inspections and provide technical opinions in the context of construction works, projects and purchases at the European Parliament in Brussels’ and to award the contract to another tenderer.

2. The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder.

3. The order of 21 December 2017, Seco Belgium and Vinçotte v Parliament (T-812/17 R), is set aside.
Case T-608/17: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2018 — Grupo Bimbo v EUIPO — DF World of Spices (TAKIS FUEGO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)

Order of the General Court of 6 June 2018 — Grupo Bimbo v EUIPO — DF World of Spices (TAKIS FUEGO)

(Case T-608/17) ( 1 )

‛(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)’

Parties

Applicant: Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV (Mexico City, Mexico) (represented by: N.A. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: DF World of Spices GmbH (Dissen, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 July 2017 (Case R 2300/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between DF World of Spices GmbH and Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV shall pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.
Case T-206/17: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2018 — Argus Security Projects v Commission and EUBAM Libya (Action for annulment — Public service contracts — Competitive negotiated procedure — Supply of security services as part of the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya — Rejection of one tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer — Circumstances subsequent to the award of the tender — Substantial change in the original terms of the contract — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2018 — Argus Security Projects v Commission and EUBAM Libya

(Case T-206/17) ( 1 )

‛(Action for annulment — Public service contracts — Competitive negotiated procedure — Supply of security services as part of the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya — Rejection of one tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer — Circumstances subsequent to the award of the tender — Substantial change in the original terms of the contract — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)’

Parties

Applicant: Argus Security Projects Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, P. Aalto and L. Baumgart, acting as Agents), European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya) (represented by: E. Raoult, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the EUBAM Libya of 24 January 2017 not to accept the tender submitted by the applicant for the award, by means of a competitive negotiated procedure, of the contract relating to security services as part of the EUBAM Libya for an integrated management of the borders in Libya (EUBAM-13-020 contract) and to award the contract to Garda World Ltd.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1) Dismisses the application;

2) Orders Argus Security Projects Ltd to pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — GE Healthcare v Commission

(Case T-783/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Medicinal products for human use - Directive 2001/83/EC - Suspension of the marketing authorisation for contrast agents containing gadolinium for human use - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency))

(2018/C 328/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GE Healthcare A/S (Oslo, Norway) (represented by: D. Scannell, Barrister, G. Castle and S. Oryszczuk, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Mifsud-Bonnici and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the suspension of operation of Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 7941 final of 23 November 2017, concerning, in the framework of Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the Parliament and of the Council, the marketing authorisations for gadolinimum-containing contrast agents for human use which contain one or more of the active substances ‘gadobenic acid, gadobutrol, gadodiamide, gadopentetic acid, gadoteric acid, gadoteridol, gadoversetamide and gadoxetic acid’.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 2 July 2018 — thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo v Commission

(Case T-577/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Customs union - Authorisation for inward processing - Risk of adverse effect on the essential interests of EU producers - Article 211(6) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Examination of the economic conditions - Scope of the Commission’s conclusions - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 301/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH (Gelsenkirchen, Germany) and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo (Isbergues, France) (represented by: M. Günes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and F. Clotuche Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the Commission’s alleged decision ostensibly contained in the minutes of the sixth meeting of the Customs Expert Group Section ‘Special Procedures other than transit’ of 2 May 2017 concluding that the essential interests of EU producers would not be adversely affected by an authorisation for inward processing of certain grain-oriented electrical steel products requested by Euro-Mit Staal BV.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on Euro-Mit Staal BV’s application to intervene.

3. In addition to bearing its own costs, the European Commission shall pay the costs incurred by thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo.

4. Euro-Mit Staal BV shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 September 2018 — Wall Street Systems UK v ECB

(Case T-579/17) (1)

(2018/C 427/137)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — WH v EUIPO

(Case T-819/17) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - 2016 appraisal - Deletion of certain comments from the appraisal report - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/103)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: WH (represented by: E. Fontes Vila, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and K. Tóth, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU requesting that the General Court order EUIPO to delete from the applicant’s appraisal report for the year 2016 all criticism concerning the applicant’s communication style, inasmuch as it constitutes a misrepresentation and infringes the applicant’s fundamental right to express ideas and opinions freely.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. WH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 72, 26.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 October 2018 — Fakro v Commission

(Case T-293/17) (1)

((Appeal - Abuse of a dominant position in the roof windows market - Action for a declaration of failure to act - Rejection decision terminating the failure to act - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/77)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Fakro sp z o.o (Nowy Sącz, Poland) (represented by: A. Radkowiak-Macuda, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I.V. Rogalski and J. Szczodrowski, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for a declaration that the Commission failed to act in that it illegally refrained from adopting a position on the complaint brought before it by the applicant on 12 July 2012 concerning abuse of a dominant position in the roof windows market.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Fakro sp. z. o. o. shall bear its own costs as well as the costs incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Republic of Poland shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.
Order of the General Court of 19 November 2018 — Iccrea Banca v Commission and SRB

(Case T-494/17) (1)

((Action for annulment and damages - Economic and Monetary Union - Banking Union - Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Determination of the ex ante contribution for 2016 - Incorrect designation of the defendant - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Delay - Hypothetical measures - Claim for damages - Closely connected with the claim for annulment - Plea of illegality - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2019/C 44/80)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo (Rome, Italy) (represented by: P. Messina, F. Isgrò and A. Dentoni Litta, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, A. Steiblytė and M. K.-Ph. Wojcik, acting as Agents) and Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: G. Rumi, S. Raes, M. Merola and T. Van Dyck, lawyers)

Re:

Principally, first, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Decision of the Executive Session of the Single Resolution Board of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and of all further decisions of the Single Resolution Board on the basis of which the Banca d’Italia adopted national decisions No 1249264/15 of 24 November 2015, No 1262091/15 of 26 November 2015, No 1547337/16 of 29 December 2016, No 0333162/17 of 14 March 2017, and No 0334520/17 of 14 March 2017, in so far as they concern the applicant, and, secondly, application for damages based on Article 268 TFEU, or, in the alternative, application based on Article 277 TFEU.

Operative part of the judgment

1. The action is dismissed;

2. Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board and the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 February 2019 — Argus Security Projects v EEAS

(Case T-131/17) (1)

(2019/C 122/37)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2018 — Amisi Kumba v Council

(Case T-141/17) (1)

(2019/C 54/51)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 3 December 2019 — Eutelsat v GSA

(Case T-99/17) (1)

(2020/C 36/47)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 July 2019 — Younique v EUIPO — Jafer Enterprises R&D (younique products)

(Case T-434/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 357/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Younique LLC (Alpine, Utah, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. García Murillo and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Jafer Enterprises R&D, SLU (Granollers, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2017 (Case R 1564/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Jafer Enterprises R&D and Younique.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Younique LLC shall bear its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. Jafer Enterprises R&D, SLU shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 July 2018 — S & V Technologies v EUIPO — Smoothline (Smoothline)

(Case T-103/18) (1)

(2018/C 319/34)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.
Case T-1/18: Order of the General Court of 4 May 2018 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission

Order of the General Court of 4 May 2018 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission

(Case T-1/18) ( 1 )

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — ZD v Parliament

(Case T-591/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Civil service - Officials - Suspension of an official from duties without withholding remuneration - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Damage to reputation - No urgency))

(2019/C 44/99)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZD (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Steele and V. Montebello-Demogeot, Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of the decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 25 September 2018 suspending the applicant from duties for a fixed period without withholding remuneration.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 August 2018 — Laboratoire Pareva and Biotech3D v Commission

(Case T-337/18 R and T-347/18 R)

((Interim relief - Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Biocidal products - Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) - Approval refused - Application for interim measures - Prima facie case - Weighing up of competing interests))

(2018/C 399/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant in case T-337/18 R: Laboratoire Pareva (Saint-Martin-de-Crau, France) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and S. Englebert, lawyers)

Applicants in case T-347/18 R: Laboratoire Pareva (Saint-Martin-de-Crau, France) and Biotech3D Ltd & Co. KG (Gampern, Austria) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and S. Englebert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lindenthal and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/619 of 20 April 2018 not approving PHMB (1415; 4.7) as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 (OJ 2018 L 102, p. 21) and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/613 of 20 April 2018 approving PHMB (1415; 4.7) as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 (OJ 2018 L 102, p. 1), and the adoption of any other appropriate interim measures.

Operative part of the order

1. Cases T-337/18 R and T-347/18 R are joined for the purpose of the present order.

2. The applications for interim measures are dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGC BROKERAGE)

(Case T-521/18) (1)

(2019/C 65/64)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 392, 29.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Antonakopoulos v Parliament

(Case T-590/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Civil service - Officials - Suspension of an official from duties without withholding remuneration - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Damage to reputation - No urgency))

(2019/C 44/98)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Leonidas Antonakopoulos (Athens, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Steele and V. Montebello-Demogeot, Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of the decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 25 September 2018 suspending the applicant from duties for an indefinite duration without withholding remuneration.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — PV v Commission

(Case T-224/18 RII)

(Interim measures - Civil Service - Disciplinary proceedings - Setting the salary at ‘zero’ - Change of circumstances - Inadmissibility - No new facts)

(2019/C 131/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: PV (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, B. Mongin and R. Striani, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation, first, of the disciplinary proceedings CMS 17/025 and, secondly, of the decision to set the applicant’s salary at zero.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.