ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/30

Order of the General Court of 3 April 2014 — ADEAS v Commission

(Case T-7/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market on certain conditions - Association - Not individually affected - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 184/52

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Association pour la défense de l’épargne et de l’actionnariat des salariés de France Télécom-Orange (ADEAS) (Paris, France) (represented by: A.-L. Lefort des Ylouses and A.-S. Gay, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/540/EU of 20 December 2011 concerning State aid No C 25/2008 (ex NN 23/2008) — Reform of the method of financing the pensions of public-service employees working for France Télécom implemented by the French Republic in favour of France Télécom (OJ 2012 L 279, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of the French Republic.

3. The Association pour la défense de l’épargne et de l’actionnariat des salariés de France Télécom-Orange (ADEAS) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The French Republic shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 159/26

Order of the General Court of 20 March 2014 — Donnici v Parliament

(Case T-43/13) (1)

((Action for damages - Members of the European Parliament - Verification of credentials - European Parliament’s decision declaring invalid a mandate as a MEP - Annulment of the decision of the Parliament by a judgment of the Court - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law))

2014/C 159/35

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Beniamino Donnici (Castrolibero, Italy) (represented by: V. Vallefuoco and J. Van Gyseghem, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz and S. Seyr, Agents)

Re:

Action for damages seeking compensation for the damage which the applicant suffered because of the adoption of Parliament’s decision of 24 May 2007 on the verification of his credentials and which was annulled by the judgment of the Court of 30 April 2009 in Joined Cases C-393/07 and C-9/08 Italy and Donnici v Parliament, ECR I-3679.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Deniamino Donnici is ordered to pay the costs of these proceedings.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/55

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Lucart France v Commission

(Case T-234/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/92

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Lucart France (Torvilliers, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Lucart France is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 253/66

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Othman v Council

(Case T-109/13) (1)

2014/C 253/91

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/25

Order of the General Court of 11 July 2014 — Eltek v OHIM — Eltec Elektronik (ELTEK)

(Case T-139/13) (1)

2014/C 329/39

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/52

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Melitta France v Commission

(Case T-224/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/88

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Melitta France (Chezy-sur-Marne, France) (represented by: H. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Melitta France is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/65

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — AEMN v Parliament

(Case T-678/13) (1)

2014/C 409/87

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 85, 22.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 380/14

Order of the General Court of 2 September 2014 — Verein Natura Havel and Vierhaus v Commission

(Case T-538/13) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Letter of formal notice sent in the context of ongoing infringement proceedings concerning the compliance with EU law of German aviation law - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

2014/C 380/18

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Verein Natura Havel eV (Berlin, Germany), and Hans-Peter Vierhaus (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Austilat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by B. Martenczuk and C. Zadra, and subsequently by B. Martenczuk and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 24 June 2013 rejecting the initial request for access to a letter of formal notice sent to the Federal Republic of Germany under Article 258 TFEU and of the Commission’s decision of 3 September 2013 rejecting the confirmatory application for access to that letter.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Verein Natura Havel eV and Hans-Peter Vierhaus are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/45

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2014 — Ratioparts-Ersatzteile v OHIM — Norwood Industries (NORTHWOOD professional forest equipment)

(Case T-592/13) (1)

(2014/C 431/70)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 448/24

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Khatziioannou v Commission and ECB

(Case T-330/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Cyprus stability support programme - Declaration of the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus - Erroneous identification of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility))

(2014/C 448/31)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Lella Khatziioannou (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: E. Efstathiou, K. Efstathiou and K. Liasidou, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P. Keppenne and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, acting as Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the declaration of the Eurogroup of 25 March 2013 concerning, inter alia, the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Lella Khatziioannou is ordered to pay, in addition to her own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/22

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2015 — Zitro IP v OHIM — Gamepoint (SPIN BINGO)

(Case T-665/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark ‘SPIN BINGO’ - Earlier Community word mark ‘ZITRO SPIN BINGO’ - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 089/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Gamepoint BV (The Hague, Netherlands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 October 2013 (Case R 1388/2012-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Zitro IP Sàrl and Gamepoint BV.

Operative part of the order

1. Dismisses the action of Zitro IP Sàrl.

2. Orders Zitro IP Sàrl to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/18

Order of the General Court of 4 December 2014 — Talanton v Commission

(Case T-165/13) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Pocemon and Perform contracts concluded as part of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (2007-2013) - Eligible costs - Repayment of sums paid - Audit report - No interest in bringing proceedings - Interest in seeking a declaration - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 056/24)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Talanton AE — Symvouleftiki-Ekpaideftiki Etaireia Dianomon, Parochis Ypiresion Marketing kai Dioikisis Epicheiriseon (Palaio Faliro, Greece) (represented by: M. Angelopoulos and K. Damis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and A. Sauka, acting as Agents, and L. Athanassiou and G. Gerapetritis, lawyers)

Re:

ACTION based on Article 272 TFEU and the first paragraph of Article 340 TFEU seeking a declaration by the Court, first, that the refusal by the Commission to allow as eligible costs certain sums paid to the applicant by way of the implementation of the Perform and Pocemon grant agreements constitutes a breach by the Commission of its contractual obligations, and, secondly, that there is no need to refund part of those sums, or the amount of the liquidate allowance specified by the Commission.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Talanton AE — Symvouleftiki-Ekpaideftiki Etaireia Dianomon, Parochis Ypiresion Marketing kai Dioikisis Epicheiriseon is ordered to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/13

Order of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — APRAM v Commission

(Case T-403/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Cohesion Fund - Regulation (EU) No 1164/94 - Reduction of financial assistance - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 228/15)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: APRAM — Administração dos Portos da Região Autónoma da Madeira, SA (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: M. Gorjão-Henriques, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 1870 final, of 27 March 2013, which reduces the contribution from the Cohesion Fund to the project ‘Development of Port infrastructures of the Autonomous Region of Madeira — Port of Caniçal’, Madeira, Portugal.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. APRAM — Administração dos Portos da Região Autónoma da Madeira, SA is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/38

Order of the General Court of 11 March 2015 — Sanctuary Brands v OHIM — Richter International (TAILORBYRD)

(Case T-598/13) (1)

(2015/C 155/45)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 118/31

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2016 — Ezz and Others v Counsel

(Case T-279/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Egypt - Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and against associated persons and entities - Freezing of funds - Inclusion of the applicants on the list of persons targeted - Legal basis - Failure to fulfil the criteria for listing - Error of law - Error of fact - Right to property - Damage to reputation - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Obligation to state reasons - Amendment of the claims and pleas in law - Lis pendens - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 118/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz (Giza, Egypt), Abla Mohammed Fawzi Ali Ahmed Salama (Cairo, Egypt), Khadiga Ahmed Ahmed Kamel Yassin (Giza) and Shahinaz Abdel Azizabdel Wahab Al Naggar (Giza) (represented by: J. Binns, Solicitor, J. Lewis, QC, B. Kennelly, J. Pobjoy, Barristers, S. Rowe and J.-F. Bellis, lawyers)

Defendant: Counsel of the European Union (represented by: I. Gurov and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2011 L 76, p. 63), as amended by Council Decision 2013/144/CFSP of 21 March 2013 (OJ 2013 L 82, p. 54), and, second, of Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 of 21 March 2011‘renewed by decision of the Council notified to the applicants by letter dated 22 March 2013’ concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2011 L 76, p. 4), in so far as those acts concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz, Abla Mohammed Fawzi Ali Ahmed Salama, Khadiga Ahmed Ahmed Kamel Yassin and Shahinaz Abdel Azizabdel Wahab Al Naggar shall bear their own costs and, in addition, pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/27

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2015 — Calestep v ECHA

(Case T-89/13) (1)

((REACH - Fee due for registration of a substance - Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises - Error in the declaration of the size of the undertaking - Decision imposing an administrative charge - Recommendation 2003/361/EC - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law))

(2015/C 381/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Calestep, SL (Estepa, Spain) (represented by: E. Cabezas Mateos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, A. Iber and C. Schultheiss, acting as Agents, and C. Garcia Molyneux, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of ECHA Decision SME (2012) 4028 of 21 December 2012, finding that the applicant does not satisfy the conditions to benefit from the reduced fees for small enterprises and imposing an administrative charge on it.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Calestep, SL shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), including those relating to the interim proceedings.

(1) OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2019 — Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association v Council

(Case T- 276/13 RENV) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Repeal of the contested act - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 19/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Growth Energy (Washington, DC, United States) and Renewable Fuels Association (Washington) (represented by: P. Vander Schueren and M. Peristeraki, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert, acting as Agent, and by N. Tuominen, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and M. França, acting as Agents), ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol (represented by: O. Prost and A. Massot, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for the annulment in part of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 of 18 February 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America (OJ 2013 L 49, p. 10), in so far as it concerns the applicants and their members

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association, the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and ePure, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/33

Order of the General Court of 17 March 2017 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — AATC Trading (ALIA)

(Case T-299/13) (1)

(2017/C 178/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/30

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2015 — Banimmo v Commission

(Case T-293/15) (1)

((Public service contracts - Withdrawal of the contested measure - No need to adjudicate on the action))

(2015/C 320/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Banimmo SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: V. Ost and M. Vanderstraeten, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 9 April 2015 by which the Commission rejected the offer which Banimmo had submitted following a property prospecting notice to meet the office space requirements of the Commission in Brussels (OJ 2014/S 130-231896).

Operative part of the order

1) There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2) There is no longer any need to rule on Banimmo’s application that the present action be adjudicated under an expedited procedure.

3) The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Banimmo, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/21

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 May 2015 — Jaber v Council

(Case T-154/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds and restriction on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 221/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Aiman Jaber (Lattakia, Syria) (represented by: A. Boesch, D. Amaudruz and M. Ponsard, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the measures imposed on the applicant under Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 2), and of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/117 of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 85).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 16/39

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2015 — Compagnia Trasporti Pubblici and Others v Commission

(Case T-188/15) (1)

((State aid - Undertaking operating bus route networks in the Campania Region - Compensation for public service obligations paid by the Italian authorities following a judgment of the Consiglio di Stato - Commission declaring the measure incompatible with the internal market - Action brought by undertakings in a similar situation to that of the aid beneficiary))

(2016/C 016/48)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Compagnia Trasporti Pubblici SpA (Naples, Italy); Atap — Azienda Trasporti Automobilistici Pubblici delle Province di Biella e Vercelli SpA (Biella, Italy); Actv SpA (Venice, Italy); Ferrovie Appulo Lucane Srl (Bari, Italy); Asstra — Associazione Trasporti (Rome, Italy); and Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV) (Rome) (represented by: M. Malena, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, G. Conte and P.J. Loewenthal, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1075 of 19 January 2015 on State aid SA.35843 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Italy — Additional public service compensation for Buonotourist (OJ 2015 L 179, p. 128).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Compagnia Trasporti Pubblici SpA, Atap — Azienda Trasporti Automobilistici Pubblici delle Province di Biella e Vercelli SpA, Actv SpA, Ferrovie Appulo Lucane Srl, Asstra Associazione Trasporti, and Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV), are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.