ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/29

Order of the General Court of 9 December 2013 — El Corte Inglés v Commission

(Case T-38/09) (1)

(Customs Union - Import of textiles declared to have originated in Jamaica - Recovery ‘a posteriori’ of import duties - Application for remission of duties - Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Commission decision rejecting that application - Annulment by the national court of the decision of the national authorities to enter in the accounts duties a posteriori - No need to adjudicate)

2014/C 45/47

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Baz and P. Muñiz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Valero Jordana and L. Keppenne, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Axstores AB, formerly Åhléns AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented initially by P. Fohlin and U. Käll, subsequently by U. Käll and T. Wetterlundh, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6317 final of 3 November 2008, finding, first, that it is justified to proceed to recovery a posteriori of those import duties not demanded from the applicant and, second, that the remission of those duties is not justified by the existence of a special situation, regarding the import of textiles declared to have originated in Jamaica (Case REM 03/07).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 195/18

Order of the General Court of 21 May 2010 — ICO Services v Parliament and Council

(Case T-441/08) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Decision No 626/2008/EC - Common framework for the selection and authorisation of operators of systems providing mobile satellite services - Absence of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 195/28

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ICO Services Ltd (Slough, Berkshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Tupper, Solicitor)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: J. Rodrigues and R. Kaškina, Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Kimberley and F. Florindo Gijón, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin and A. Nijenhuis, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Decision No 626/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2008 on the selection and authorisation of systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2008 L 172, p. 15)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. ICO Services Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 134/37

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Alisei v Commission

(Case T-16/10 R)

(Interim measures - Programme establishing a ‘food facility’ intended for developing countries - Call for proposals for the grant of funding - Refusal of funding - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 134/64

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Alisei (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Sciaudone, R. Sciaudone and A. Neri, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and P. van Nuffel, Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures relating to the selection of applications for funding submitted under the ‘Facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries’ (EuropeAid/128608/C/ACT/Multi).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/14

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 July 2010 — Cross Czech v Commission

(Case T-252/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Sixth Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities - Letter confirming the findings of a financial audit - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 260/19

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cross Czech a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Schollaert, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and W. Roels, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the Commission’s letter of 12 March 2010 confirming the findings of the audit of financial statements submitted by the applicant for the period from 1 February 2005 to 30 April 2008 in respect of the eMapps.com, CEEC IST NET and Transfer-East projects

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 195/32

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2010 — France v Commission

(Case T-74/09) (1)

2010/C 195/52

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 102, 1.05.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/24

Order of the President of the General Court of 7 December 2010 — ArcelorMittal Wire France and Others v Commission

(Case T-385/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Financial loss - Absence of exceptional circumstances - No urgency)

2011/C 55/43

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: ArcelorMittal Wire France (Bourg-en-Bresse, France); ArcelorMittal Fontaine (Fontaine-l’Évêque, Belgium); and ArcelorMittal Verderio Srl (Verderio Inferiore, Italy) (represented by: H. Calvet, O. Billard and M. Pittie, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, L. Parpala and V. Bottka, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final, of 30 June 2010, relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing steel), as amended by Commission Decision C(2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed;
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/58

Order of the General Court of 28 October 2010 — Babcock Noell v Entreprise commune Fusion for Energy

(Case T-299/10) (1)

()

2010/C 346/116

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 152/22

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — Iberdrola v Commission

(Case T-486/10 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Compensation for the additional production costs of certain power plants arising from the public service obligation to produce certain volumes of electricity out of indigenous coal and implementation of a ‘preferential dispatch mechanism’ in their favour - Decision not to raise objections - Application for suspension of operation - Prima facie case - Lack of urgency - Weighing of the interests)

2011/C 152/41

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Iberdrola, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado and É. Barbier de la Serre, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J.M. Rodríguez Cárcamo, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, in essence, an order for the suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2010) 4499 of 29 September 2010 relating to State aid No N 178/2010 notified by the Kingdom of Spain in the form of a public service compensation linked to a preferential dispatch mechanism in favour of electricity power plants which use indigenous coal

Operative part of the order

1. E.ON Generación, SL, Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico SA and the Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón are granted leave to intervene in support of the form of order sought by the European Commission.

2. The order of the President of the General Court of 3 November 2010 in Case T-486/10 R Iberdrola v Commission, not published in the ECR, is cancelled.

3. A period shall be fixed for Iberdrola, the Commission and the Kingdom of Spain to request that certain confidential information in the file and in the present order be excluded from communication to the parties referred to in point 1 of this operative part and to provide, for the purposes of that communication, a non-confidential version of the documents in the file and of the present order.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 113/20

Order of the General Court of 16 February 2011 — Commission v Earthscan

(Case T-5/10) (1)

2011/C 113/41

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 219/16

Order of the General Court of 27 May 2011 — Danzeisen v Commission

(Case T-242/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Regulation No 271/2010 - Action rendered devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 219/24

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Werner Danzeisen (Eichstetten, Germany) (represented by: H. Schmidt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen, F.W. Bulst and M. Vollkommer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment in part of Commission Regulation (EU) No 271/2010 of 24 March 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, as regards the organic production logo of the European Union (OJ 2010 L 84, p. 19)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/20

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Westfälische Drahtindustrie and Others v Commission

(Case T-393/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Decision of the Commission imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application to suspend operation)

2011/C 282/40

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH (Hamm, Germany); Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG (Hamm); and Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co KG (Iserlohn, Germany) (represented by: C. Stadler and N. Tkatchenko, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, R. Sauer and C. Hödlmayr, agents, assisted by R. van der Hout, lawyer)

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Pre-stressing steel), as amended by Commission Decision C(2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010, in so far as a fine was thereby imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the order

1. The obligation of Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG to provide the Commission with a bank guarantee in order to avoid immediate collection of the fines imposed on them under Article 2(1) of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 in a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Pre-stressing steel) as amended by Commission Decision C(2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010, is suspended under the following conditions (a) by 30 June 2011, Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the Commission the sum of EUR [confidential] million; (b) from 15 July 2011 until further notice they shall pay to the Commission monthly instalments of EUR 300 000 (on the 15th of each month), but not beyond delivery of judgment in the main proceedings.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 238/17

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-256/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Removal of personal effects - Implied and express rejection of the appellant’s requests - Duty to state reasons - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 238/30

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 March 2010 in Case F-102/08 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the annulment of that order.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance.

(1) OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 340/22

Order of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — PPG and SNF v ECHA

(Case T-268/10) (1)

(Actions for annulment - REACH - Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern - Time-limit for bringing an action - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 340/46

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG) (Brussels, Belgium); and SNF SAS (Andrézieux-Bouthéon, France) (represented: initially by K. Van Maldegem, R. Cana, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Solicitor, and subsequently by K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkila and W. Broere, Agents);

Interveners in support of the defendant: the Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Noort et J. Langer, Agents); and the European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the ECHA identifying acrylamide (EC No 201-173-7) as a substance meeting the criteria set out in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1) and including acrylamide in the candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to the Regulation, taken pursuant to Article 59 thereof.

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG) and SNF SAS shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

3. The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 331/21

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission

(Case T-223/10) (1)

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Withdrawal of the contested debit note - Cessation of existence of the dispute - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 331/40

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Regione Puglia (Bari, Italy) (represented by: F. Brunelli and A. Aloia, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and A. Steiblytė, agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of debit note No 3241001630 of 26 February 2010 concerning Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, incorporating a reduction in the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) assistance granted in application of Commission Decision C(2000) 2349 of 8 August 2000, incorporating approval of the operational programme POR Puglia for the period 2000-2006, on the basis of Objective No 1.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the present proceedings and the Regione Puglia shall bear the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 126/17

Order of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Octapharma Pharmazeutika v EMA

(Case T-573/10) (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Changes to a plasma master file (PMF) - Fees payable to the EMA - Act with adverse effects - Measure merely confirmatory - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 126/34

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsgesellschaft mbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: I. Brinker and T. Holzmüller, lawyers, and J. Schwarze, Professor)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: V. Salvatore, acting as Agent, and H.-G. Kamann and P. Gey, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the letter of 21 October 2010 (EMA/643425/2010) by which the European Medicines Agency (EMA) refused to repay to the applicant the sum of EUR 180 700 corresponding to the difference between, on the one hand, the sum the applicant paid to it in respect of fees for the examination of variations to the terms of a marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products and, on the other hand, the sum which the applicant maintains it should have paid.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsgesellschaft mbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 55, 19.2.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/14

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2011 — Apple v OHIM — Iphone Media (IPH IPHONE)

(Case T-448/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Partial refusal of registration - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 13/30

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Apple Inc. (California, United States) (represented by: M. Engelman, Barrister and J. Olsen, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Iphone Media SA (Seville, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 July 2010 (Case R 1084/2009-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Apple Inc and Iphone Media SA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 366/34

Order of the General Court of 3 October 2012 — Tecnimed v OHIM — Ecobrands (ZAPPER-CLICK)

(Case T-360/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Period allowed for bringing proceedings - Out of time - No unforeseeable circumstances - No force majeure - Right of access to a court - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 366/66

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tecnimed Srl (Vedano Olona, Italy) (represented by: M. Franzosi and V. Piccarreta, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ecobrands Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 June 2010 (Case R 1795/2008-4), concerning invalidity proceedings between Tecnimed Srl and Ecobrands Ltd.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Tecnimed Srl to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 55, 19.2.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 151/28

Order of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Asociación Española de Banca v European Commission

(Case T-236/10) (1)

(Actions for annulment - State aid - Aid schemes allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of aid - Association - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 151/46

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Asociación Española de Banca (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1(1) and, alternatively, Article 4 of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Asociación Española de Banca is to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/17

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2014 — Gap granen & producten v Commission

(Case T-437/10) (1)

2014/C 78/34

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 164/25

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia v Commission

(Case T-520/10) (1)

2013/C 164/42

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 429/23

Order of the General Court of 26 October 2015 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Vinotasia (VITASIA)

(Case T-124/10) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 429/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: A. Marx and M. Schaeffer, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Vinotasia GmbH (Coblenz, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 January 2010 (Case R 1054/2008-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Vinotasia GmbH and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to rule on the action.

2. Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG and Vinotasia GmbH shall bear their own costs and each pay half of those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

(1) OJ C 134, 22.5.2015.