ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/42

Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — British Sugar v Commission

(Case T-86/10) (1)

(Agriculture - Sugar - Production levies - Annulment and declaration of invalidity in part of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after bringing of the action - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 156/79

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: British Sugar plc (London (United Kingdom)) (represented by: initially by K. Lasok QC, G. Facenna, Barrister, W. Robinson, P. Doris and D. Das, Solicitors, then by K. Lasok QC, G. Facenna, W. Robinson and D. Das)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks and P. Rossi, Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicants: Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by F. Díez Moreno, then by A. Rubio González, abogados del Estado); and Republic of Lithuania (represented by: R. Janeckaitė and R. Krasuckaitė, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Drēviņa and K. Krasovska, Agents); and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented: initially by S. Behzadi-Spencer and S. Hathaway, and then by Behzadi-Spencer and A. Robinson, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 of 3 November 2009 correcting Regulations (EC) No 1762/2003, (EC) No 1775/2004, (EC) No 1686/2005, (EC) No 164/2007 and fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for marketing years 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005, 2005/2006 (OJ 2009 L 321, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of British Sugar plc.

3. The Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 392/27

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-104/10) (1)

((Action for annulment - ERDF - Reduction in financial aid - RESIDER II programme - Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action manifestly well founded))

(2017/C 392/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and T. Henze, acting as Agents, and C. von Donat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann, B. Conte and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10561 of 18 December 2009 on the reduction of the contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) granted by Commission Decision C(95) 2529 of 27 November 1995 in respect of the RESIDER II Programme Saarland (1994-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Operative part of the order

1. Commission Decision C(2009) 10561 of 18 December 2009 on the reduction of the contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) granted by Commission Decision C(95) 2529 of 27 November 1995 in respect of the RESIDER II Programme Saarland (1994-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany is annulled.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.
Order of the General Court of 25 November 2014 — Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission

(Joined Cases T-428/10 and T-577/10 and Case T-441/12) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Competition - Cartels - European prestressing steel market - Price fixing, market sharing and exchange of sensitive commercial information - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Decision amending the initial decision without affecting the fines imposed on the applicant - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Partial manifest inadmissibility)

(2015/C 073/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, SL (Santander, Spain) (represented by: in Cases T-428/10 and T-577/10, F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, and, in Case T-441/12, initially F. González Díaz and P. Herrero Prieto, then F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and V. Bottka, and, in Case T-441/12, C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents, and by L. Ortiz Blanco, lawyer)

Re:

Applications for annulment and alteration of Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel), amended by Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 and by Commission Decision C (2011) 2269 final of 4 April 2011, and by the letter COMP/G2/DVE/nvz/79465 from the Commission’s Director-General for Competition of 25 July 2012.

Operative part of the order

1. In Case T-428/10, the form of order seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 amending Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel) is rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

2. In Case T-577/10, the action is rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

3. The remainder of the pleas in law and forms of order sought is reserved.

4. Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, SL is ordered to pay the costs relating to the pleas in law and forms of order directed against Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 amending Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel) made in Case T-428/10 and the costs in Case T-577/10.

(1) OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 305/10

Order of the General Court of 30 August 2011 — PASP and Others v Council

(Case T-177/11) (1)

2011/C 305/12

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/49

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 July 2011 — Petroci v Council

(Case T-160/11 R)

(Interim measures - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Freezing of funds - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No need to adjudicate in the main proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 269/110

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société nationale d’opérations pétrolières de la Côte d’Ivoire Holding (Petroci Holding) (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and A. Vitro, Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, under Article 278 TFEU, suspension of operation of (i) Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36) and (ii) Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/15

Order of the President of the General Court of 18 November 2011 — EMA v Commission

(Case T-116/11 R)

(Application for Interim measures - Research and technological development programme - Decision ending the participation in a project - Debit note - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

2012/C 13/31

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Association médicale européenne (EMA) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A.Franchi, L. Picciano and N. di Castelnuovo)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by S. Delaude and N. Bambara, then S. Delaude and F. Moro, Agents, and D. Gullo, lawyer)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the Commission decision of 5 November 2010 terminating the contracts concluded for two research projects and the debit note of 13 December 2010 informing the applicant of the establishment of debts in the execution of those contracts.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/34

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Eurofer v Commission

(Case T-381/11 R)

(Interim relief - Environment - Allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC - Setting of the product benchmarks the subject of the Commission’s decision - Application for interim measures - Admissibility - Urgency)

2011/C 347/60

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Europäischer Wirtschaftsverband der Eisen- und Stahlindustrie (Eurofer) ASBL (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and C. Dittrich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wilms, K. Mifsud-Bonnici and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 130, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 80/26

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission

(Case T-362/11) (1)

2012/C 80/47

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/21

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Westfälisch-Lippischer Sparkassen- und Giroverband v Commission

(Case T-22/11) (1)

2012/C 39/41

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 133/26

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2012 — Barthel and Others v Court of Justice

(Case T-398/11) (1)

(Appeal - Public Service - Officials - Remuneration - Refusal to grant the appellants an allowance for shiftwork - Time-limit for lodging a complaint - Out of time - Appeal partly manifestly unfounded and partly manifestly inadmissible)

2012/C 133/52

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Yvette Barthel (Arlon, Belgium); Marianne Reiffers (Olm, Luxembourg); and Lieven Massez (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice (represented by: A. Placco, acting as Agent)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 May 2011 in Case F-59/10 Barthel and Others v Court of Justice [2011] II-0000, seeking the annulment of that order.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Ms Yvette Barthel, Ms Marianne Reiffers and Mr Lieven Massez are to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 109/13

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 February 2012 — Dansk Automat Brancheforening v Commission

(Case T-601/11 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Danish law instituting lower duties for providers of online gaming - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2012/C 109/30

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Applicant: Dansk Automat Brancheforening (Fredericia, Denmark) (represented by: K. Dyekjær, T. Høg and J. Flodgaard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso and C. Barslev, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2011) 6499 final of 20 September 2011 on the measure No C 35/2010 (ex N 302/2010) which Denmark is planning to implement in the form of duties for online gaming in the Danish Gaming Duties Act

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/9

Order of the General Court of 9 July 2012 — Pigui v Commission

(Case T-382/11) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Position taken - Application for directions to be issued - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 273/14

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cristina Pigui (Strejnic, Romania) (represented by: M. Alexe, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Enegren and D. Roussanov, Agents)

Re:

Action for failure to act, seeking a declaration that the European Commission unlawfully failed to define its position on the applicant’s request, first, to initiate, pursuant to Articles 4 and 15 of Decision No 1720/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning (OJ 2006 L 327, p. 45), an investigation into the Online Master organised by the European Online Academy (EOA), founded by the Centre international de formation européenne (CIFE), in cooperation with the Jean Monnet Chair at the University of Cologne (Germany), and, second, to take all measures provided for by Article 6 of that decision in order to prevent further illegal conduct, to restore the situation ab initio of those persons affected by such illegal conduct or, at least, in so far as the applicant is concerned, and, lastly, to withdraw the funding for that Master if it fails to comply with key human rights principles, to which reference is made in Article 1(3)(i) of that decision, and relevant principles of European Union law.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Cristina Pigui shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 227/22

Order of the General Court (the judge hearing the application for interim measures) of 13 June 2012 — Morison Menon Chartered Accountants and Others v Council

(Case T-656/11 R II)

(Application for interim measures - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 227/36

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Morison Menon Chartered Accountants and Others (Dubai, United Arab Emirates); Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Dubai Office (Dubai); Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Sharjah Office (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: H. Viaene, T. Ruys and D. Gillet, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-M. Joséphidès and S. Kyriakopoulou, Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for the suspension of operation of, first, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11), and second, Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), to the extent that they add to the list of persons and entities whose funds and economic resources are to be frozen the entity designated as ‘Morison Menon Chartered Accountant’.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 399/22

Order of the General Court of 23 October 2012 — Chivas v OHIM — Glencairn Scotch Whisky (CHIVALRY)

(Case T-530/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Opposition withdrawn - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 399/42

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chivas Holdings (IP) Ltd (Paisley, Renfrewshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Carboni, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Glencairn Scotch Whisky Co. Ltd (Glasgow, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2011 (Case R-2334/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Glencairn Scotch Whisky Co. Ltd and Chivas Holdings (IP) Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 362, 10.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 343/16

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2012 — Diadikasia Symbouloi Epicheiriseon v Commission and Others

(Case T-369/11) (1)

(Action for damages - Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance - Third country - National public procurement - Decentralised management - Inadmissibility - Lack of jurisdiction)

2012/C 343/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Diadikasia Symbouloi Epicheiriseon AE (Chalandri, Greece) (represented by: A. Krystallidis, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and P. van Nuffel, Agents); European Union Delegation to Turkey (Ankara, Turkey); and Central Finance & Contracts Unit (CFCU) (Ankara, Turkey)

Re:

Application for compensation in respect of the damage arising from the CFCU’s decision of 5 April 2011, and any subsequent decision, annulling the award of the contract ‘Enlargement of the European Turkish Business Centres Network to Sivas, Antakya, Batman and Van — EuropeAid/128621/D/SER/TR’ to the consortium Diadikasia Business Consultants SA (GR) — Wyg International Ltd (UK) — Deleeuw International Ltd (TR) — Cyberpark (TR), on the ground of allegedly false declarations

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Diadikasia Symbouloi Epicheiriseon AE shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/23

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Dectane v OHIM — Hella (DAYLINE)

(Case T-463/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 38/41

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dectane GmbH (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: P. Ehrlinger and T. Hagen, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by K. Klüpfel, then by K. Klüpfel and D. Botis, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. (Lippstadt, Germany) (represented by: R. Schnekenbühl, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2011 (Case R 1231/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. and Dectane GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs of the defendant.

(1) OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/45

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2012 — ADEDY and Others v Council

(Case T-215/11) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Decisions addressed to a Member State with a view to remedying a situation of excessive deficit - No direct concern - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 26/89

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Anotati Dioikisi Enoseon Dimosion Ypallilon (ADEDY), (Athens, Greece); Spyridon Papaspyros (Athens); and Ilias Iliopoulos (Athens) (represented by: M.-M. Tsipra, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Maganza, M. Vitsentzatos and A. de Gregorio Merino, acting as Agents)

Intervening party in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J. P. Keppenne and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Council Decision 2011/57/EU of 20 December 2010 amending Decision 2010/320/EU (OJ 2010 L 145, p. 6) addressed to Greece with a view to reinforcing and deepening fiscal surveillance and giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit (OJ 2011 L 26, p. 15)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Anotati Dioikisi Enoseon Dimosion Ypallilon (ADEDY), Mr Spyridon Papaspyros and Mr Ilias Iliopoulos shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 186, 25.6.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/83

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2013 — Barloworld v Commission

(Case T-459/11) (1)

2013/C 225/189

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 305, 15.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/37

Order of the General Court of 20 February 2013 — Luxembourg Patent Co. v OHIM — DETEC (FIREDETEC)

(Case T-527/11) (1)

2013/C 108/88

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 370, 17.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/18

Order of the General Court of 27 January 2014 — Commission v OHIM — European Alliance for Solutions and Innovations (EASI European Alliance Solutions Innovations)

(Case T-659/11) (1)

2014/C 78/36

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 58, 25.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/22

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2013 — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria v Commission

(Case T-429/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme permitting tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and not ordering the recovery of the aid - Act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Lack of status as an actual recipient under the aid scheme - No obligation to repay the aid - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 336/44

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by R. Lyal, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Request for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2011/282/EU of 12 January 2011 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions No C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 135, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.