ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 May 2016 — Abeloos v Commission

(Case F-60/14) (1)

(2016/C 222/74)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 421, 24/11/2014, p. 60.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/38

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 September 2015 — Verhelst v EMA

(Case F-9/15) (1)

(2015/C 346/43)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 118, 13.4.2015, p. 46.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 145/37

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — Kozak v Commission

(Case F-152/15)

((Civil service - Open Competition EPSO/AD/293/14 - Decision of the selection board not to admit a candidate to sit tests at the assessment centre - Request for review - New decision of the selection board confirming its initial decision - Communication by EPSO of a reasoned reply - Purely confirmatory act - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 145/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Małgorzata Kozak (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: J. Łojkowska-Paprocka, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of EPSO not to admit the applicant to the assessment stage of Competition EPSO/AD/293/14.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 48/102

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 December 2015 — Morin v Commission

(Case F-129/15) (1)

(2016/C 048/121)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 414, 14/12/2015, p. 44.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 July 2016 — HE v Commission

(Case F-93/15)

(2016/C 364/77)

Language of the case: French

The Single Judge has ordered that the case be removed from the register.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/52

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 8 June 2016 — Massoulié v Parliament

(Case F-146/15) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Parliament - Inter-institutional transfer - 2014 promotion exercise - Request seeking the conversion of staff reports into merit points - Reclassification of a complaint as a request - Article 90 of the Staff Regulations - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 260/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: François Massoulié (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: V. Montebello-Demogeot and M. Dean, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision rejecting the applicant’s request for the staff reports drawn up since his promotion to grade AD 12 to be converted into merit points.

Operative part of the order

1. Mr François Massoulié’s action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Massoulié is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 68, 22.2.2016, p. 45.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/64

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 June 2014 — Wilders v Parliament and Council

(Case T-410/14 R)

((Interim measures - European Parliament - Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage - Incompatibility of the office of Member of the European Parliament with that of member of a national parliament (ban on holding a dual mandate) - Application for interim measures - Disregard of formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/107

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Geert Wilders (represented by: G. Knoops and C. Hamburger, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament and Council of the European Union

Re:

Application for interim measures, essentially to permit the applicant to be officially sworn in as a member of the European Parliament, while continuing to hold the office of Member of the Netherlands Parliament

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/26

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 September 2014 — Walter Klein v Commission

(Case T-297/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - National support for the generation of renewable electricity - Commission decision to open the State aid formal investigation procedure - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case))

(2014/C 431/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Walter Klein GmbH & Co. KG (Wuppertal, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz and B. Wißmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened the State aid formal investigation procedure concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 361/10

Order of the General Court of 20 August 2014 — Alsharghawi v Council

(Case T-532/14 R)

((Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya - List of persons and entities to which those measures apply - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency - Weighing of interests))

2014/C 361/13

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bashir Saley Bashir Alsharghawi (Johannesburg, South Africa) (represented by: E. Moutet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and V. Piessevaux, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (OJ 2011 L 58, p. 53) and Council Decision 2011/178/CFSP of 23 March 2011 amending Decision 2011/137/CFSP (OJ 2011 L 78, p. 24) in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/23

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2014 — STC v Commission

(Case T-355/14 R)

((Interim measures - Public services contracts - Tendering procedure - Construction and maintenance of a tri-generation plant - Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer - Application for interim measures - Prima facie case not made out))

(2015/C 056/32)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: STC SpA (Forlì, Italy) (represented by: A. Marelli and G. Delucca, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Cappelletti, L. Di Paolo and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

In essence (i) an application to suspend the operation of the Commission’s decision of 3 April 2014 in which the Commission rejected the tender submitted by STC in tendering procedure JRC IPR 2013 C04 0031 OC for the construction and maintenance of a tri-generation plant with a gas turbine on the Ispra (Italy) site of its Joint Research Centre (JRC) (OJ 2013/S 137-237146), the decision in which the Commission awarded the contract to CPL Concordia and consequently all other subsequent decisions; and (ii) an application to suspend the operation of the Commission’s decision to refuse the request for access to the documents and an interim measure to allow the full exercise of the right of access to the tender documents.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/34

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 November 2014 — SEA v Commission

(Case T-674/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - Obligation to recover aid granted by the public operator of an airport to a subsidiary management company - Liquidation of the company - Creation of a new management company - Commission decision to initiate a formal State aid investigation procedure in order to assess the existence of any economic continuity between the two companies - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Manifest inadmissibility of the main application - Inadmissibility - Lack of urgency))

(2015/C 026/43)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Società per azioni esercizi aeroportuali (SEA) (Segrate, Italy) (represented by: F. Gatti, J.-F. Bellis, F. Di Gianni and A. Scalini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and G. Conte, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, in essence, the suspension of European Commission Decision C(2014) 4537 final of 9 July 2014 to initiate a formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU concerning the establishment of the company Airport Handling [SA.21420 (2014/NN) — Italy — Establishment of Airport Handling].

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/39

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Buderus Guss v Commission

(Case T-302/14) (1)

(2015/C 155/51)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/26

Order of the General Court of 5 January 2015 — La Perla v OHIM — Alva Management (LA PERLA)

(Case T-492/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 089/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: La Perla sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Siciarek, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Alva Management GmbH (Icking, Germany) (represented by: B. Hanika, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 April 2014 (Case R 626/2013-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Alva Management GmbH and La Perla sp. z o.o.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 205/42

Order of the General Court of 13 April 2015 — noon Copenhagen v OHIM — Wurster Diamonds (noon)

(Case T-637/14) (1)

(2015/C 205/58)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/40

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Neue Halberg-Guss v Commission

(Case T-308/14) (1)

(2015/C 155/56)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 245/21

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — H-O-T Servicecenter Nürnberg and Others v Commission

(Case T-289/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate - Action for annulment - Application to amend the form of order sought - No new information - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 245/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: H-O-T Servicecenter Nürnberg GmbH (Nuremberg, Germany); H-O-T Servicecenter Schmölln GmbH & Co. KG (Schmölln, Germany); H-O-T Servicecenter Allgäu GmbH & Co. KG (Memmingerberg, Germany); and EB Härtetechnik GmbH & Co. KG (Nuremberg) (represented by: initially A. Reuter, C. Arhold, N. Wimmer, F.-A. Wesche, K. Kindereit, R. Busch, A. Hohler and T. Woltering, then A. Reuter, C. Bürger, T. Christner and G. Müllejans, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The application seeking that the form of order sought in the present action be amended to cover Commission decision C (2014) 8786 final of 25 November 2014 relating to State Aid SA. 33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users is rejected as inadmissible.

3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

4. H-O-T Servicecenter Nürnberg GmbH, H-O-T Servicecenter Schmölln GmbH & Co. KG, H-O-T Servicecenter Allgäu GmbH & Co. KG and EB Härtetechnik GmbH & Co. KG shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

5. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/14

Order of the General Court of 18 May 2015 — ABZ Aardbeien Uit Zaad Holding and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-560/14) (1)

((Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 - Measures concerning compliance by users in the Union with the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 228/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ABZ Aardbeien Uit Zaad Holding BV (Hoorn NH, Netherlands) and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: P. de Jong, P. Vlaemminck and B. Van Vooren, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio, J. Rodrigues and R. Van de Westelaken, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and M. Simm, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation in the Union (OJ 2014 L 150, p. 59).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to rule on the application for leave to intervene lodged by the European Seed Association (ESA) and the Association internationale des producteurs de l’horticulture (AIPH).

3. ABZ Aardbeien Uit Zaad Holding BV and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 294/57

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Schmiedag v Commission

(Case T-183/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate - Action for annulment - Application to amend the form of order sought - No new information - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 294/68)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Schmiedag GmbH (Hagen, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: EFTA Surveillance Authority (represented by: initially X. Lewis, M. Schneider and C. Howdle, then X. Lewis, M. Schneider, M. Moustakali and C. Perrin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The application seeking that the form of order sought in the present action be amended to cover Commission decision C (2014) 8786 final of 25 November 2014 relating to State Aid SA. 33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users is rejected as inadmissible.

3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for intervention submitted by Flachglas Torgau GmbH and Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG, by Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG and Kronoply GmbH, by Bayer MaterialScience AG, by Sabic Polyolefine GmbH, by Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH, Ineos Phenol GmbH and Ineos Vinyls Deutschland GmbH, and by Advansa GmbH, Akzo Nobel Industrial Chemicals GmbH, Aurubis AG, CBW Chemie GmbH, CFB Chemische Fabrik Brunsbüttel GmbH & Co. KG, Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH, Dralon GmbH, Hahl Filaments GmbH, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Siegen, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Salzgitter, Nabaltec AG, Siltronic AG and Wacker Chemie AG.

4. Schmiedag GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

5. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
Case T-821/14: Order of the General Court of 19 June 2015 — Pollo Delta di Scabin Giancarlo e C. v Commission

Order of the General Court of 19 June 2015 — Pollo Delta di Scabin Giancarlo e C. v Commission

(Case T-821/14) ( 1 )

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 311/47

Order of the General Court of 24 June 2015 — Wm. Wrigley Jr. v OHIM (Representation of a sphere)

(Case T-625/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark representing a sphere - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 311/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter and C. Schmitt, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 June 2014 (Case R 168/2014-5) relating to an application for registration of a figurative sign representing a sphere as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 294/58

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — ArcelorMittal Hamburg and Others v Commission

(Case T-235/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/70)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH (Hamburg, Germany); ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH, successor in law to Bregal Bremer Galvanisierungs GmbH (Bremen, Germany); ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH (Duisburg, Germany); and ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH (Duisburg) (represented by: H. Janssen and G.-R. Engel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH, ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH, ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH and ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/38

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2015 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-784/14) (1)

((Action for annulment - European Union’s own resources - Financial liability of the Member States - Obligation to pay the Commission the amount corresponding to a loss of own resources - Amount of default interest - Letter from the Commission - Act not subject to appeal - Inadmissible))

(2015/C 381/44)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented by: R. Radu, I. Haţieganu, and A. Buzoianu, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and A. Stefanuc, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision allegedly made by the Commission’s Directorate-General for Budget contained in the letter BUDG/B/03MV D(2014) 3079038 of 19 September 2014, by which the Commission ordered Romania to provide it with the gross amount of EUR 14 883,79 (from which 25 % should be deducted for collection costs corresponding to a loss of traditional own resources, at the latest on the first working day following the nineteenth day of the second month following the dispatch of that letter.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene by the Slovak Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany.

3. Romania shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

4. Romania, the Commission, the Slovak Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 65, 23.3.2015.