ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/33

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2014 — Sothys Auriac v OHIM — Grand Hotel Primavera (BEAUTY GARDEN)

(Case T-470/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of that application - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 112/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sothys Auriac (Auriac, France) (represented by: A. Berthet, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Grand Hotel Primavera SA (Borgo Maggiore, San Marino)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 July 2012 (Case R 1419/2011-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Grand Hotel Primavera SA and Sothys Auriac.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/20

Order of the General Court of 17 September 2014 — Afepadi and Others v Commission

(Case T-354/12) (1)

((Action for annulment - Health claims made in the labelling and advertising of foods - Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 - Recitals 11, 14 and 17 - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility))

(2014/C 431/34)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Preparados alimenticios especiales, dietéticos y plantas medicinales (Afepadi) (Barcelona, Spain); Elaborados Dietéticos, SA (Palma de Cervelló, Spain); Nova Diet, SA (Burgos, Spain); Laboratorios Vendrell, SA (Barcelona); and Ynsadiet, SA (Leganés, Spain) (represented by: P. Velázquez González, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Grünheid and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and S. Menez, acting as Agents)

Re:

In particular, an action for the annulment of recitals 11, 14 and 17 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 of 16 May 2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health (OJ 2012 L 136, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Preparados alimenticios especiales, dietéticos y plantas medicinales (Afepadi), Elaborados Dietéticos, SA, Nova Diet, SA, Laboratorios Vendrell, SA and Ynsadiet, SA shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/49

Order of the General Court of 25 June 2014 — Accorinti and Others v ECB

(Case T-224/12) (1)

((Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - ECB - National central banks - Restructuring of the Greek Government debt - Eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by Greece for the purposes of Eurosystem monetary policy operations - Sufficient maintenance of the credit quality threshold in order to remain eligible - Collateral enhancement in the form of a buy-back scheme for debt instruments for the benefit of the national central banks - Private creditors - Whether certain legal effects may be attributed to the contested measure - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/83

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Alessandro Accorinti (Nichelino, Italy) and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: S. Sutti and R. Spelta, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: initially A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, S. Bening and P. Papapaschalis, and subsequently S. Bening and P. Papapaschalis, Agents, and E. Castellani, T. Lübbig and B. Kaiser, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Decision 2012/153/EU of the European Central Bank of 5 March 2012 on the eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic in the context of the Hellenic Republic’s debt exchange offer (ECB/2012/3) (OJ 2012 L 77, p. 19).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Mr Alessandro Accorinti and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 314/35

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2016 — Virgin Media v Commission

(Case T-460/12) (1)

(2016/C 314/48)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/24

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2015 — Hautau v Commission

(Case T-256/12) (1)

(2015/C 178/24)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 298/11

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2013 — Sun Capital Partners v OHIM — Sun Capital Partners (SUN CAPITAL)

(Case T-164/13) (1)

2013/C 298/19

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 171/40

Order of the General Court of 23 April 2013 — Zhejiang Heda Solar Technology v Commission

(Case T-143/13) (1)

2013/C 171/83

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/18

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-283/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Action dismissed at first instance as manifestly inadmissible - The application lodged by fax and the original subsequently received not the same - Original application lodged out of time - Action out of time - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2014/C 15/26

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2013 in Case F-131/12 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/13

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2013 — Vicente Gandia Pla, SA v OHIM — Tesco Stores (MARQUES DE CHIVÉ)

(Case T-128/13) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Surrender of national trade mark - Action which becomes devoid of purpose in the course of proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 359/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Vicente Gandia Pla, SA (Chiva, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Tesco Stores Ltd (Cheshunt, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 December 2012 (Case R 854/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Tesco Stores Ltd and Vicente Gandia Pla, SA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 January 2014 — Miettinen v Council

(Case T-303/13) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Opinion of the Council’s Legal Service - Refusal of access - Disclosure after the action was brought - Action becoming devoid of purpose - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2014/C 71/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Samuli Miettinen (Espoo, Finland) (represented by: O. Brouwer, E. Raedts, lawyers, and A. Villette, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Pellinghelli and É. Sitbon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Council’s decision of 25 March 2013 refusing to grant the applicant access to the full text of the opinion of the Council’s Legal Service, reference 15309/12.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of Sweden and the Republic of Finland.

(1) OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/32

Order of the General Court of 19 December 2013 — da Silva Tenreiro v Commission

(Case T-32/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Nomination to post of Director of Directorate A ‘Civil Justice’ in the Commission’s Directorate General ‘Justice’ - Rejection of the applicant’s candidature - Nomination of another candidate - Misuse of powers - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2014/C 45/54

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Mario Paulo da Silva Tenreiro (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2012 in Case F-120/11 da Silva Tenreiro v Commission, seeking annulment of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Mario Paulo da Silva Tenreiro shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/44

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — SACBO v Commission and INEA

(Case T-270/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Community financial aid to projects of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks - Lack of direct concern - Non-actionable measure - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 175/61

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Società per l'aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA) (Grassobbio, Italy) (represented by: M. Muscardini and G. Greco, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and E. Montaguti, Agents) and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) (represented by: I. Ramallo, Agent, and M. Merola, C. Santacroce and L. Armati, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 18 March 2013 of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency (TEN-T EA) relating to certain expenditure incurred in carrying out a feasibility study concerning the intermodal nature of the Bergamo-Orio al Serio airport (Italy) following the grant of financial aid by the Commission to the Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile (ENAC, Italian national civil aviation authority).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application by the Republic of Poland for leave to intervene.

3. The Società per l’aeroporto civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA).

(1) OJ C 207, 20. 7. 2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 142/55

Order of the General Court of 5 February 2014 — Hermann Trollius v ECHA

(Case T-466/13) (1)

2014/C 142/73

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/72

Order of the General Court of 2 June 2014 — Time v OHIM (InStyle)

(Case T-651/13) (1)

2014/C 315/121

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 194/38

Order of the General Court of 11 April 2014 — Serco Belgium and Others v Commission

(Case T-644/13) (1)

2014/C 194/54

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/55

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Gopack v Commission

(Case T-235/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/93

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gopack (Manosque, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Gopack is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/58

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — ICT v Commission

(Case T-243/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/97

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA (ICT) (Borgo a Mozzano, Italy) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Industrie Cartarie Tronchetti SpA (ICT) is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/41

Order of the General Court of 23 September 2014 — Jaczewski v Commission

(Case T-178/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Agriculture - Interest in bringing proceedings - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 409/58

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Grzegorz Jaczewski (Bielany, Poland) (represented by: M. Goss, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and A. Szmytkowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2012) 5049 final of 24 July 2012 approving the grant of complementary national direct payments in Poland for 2012.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Grzegorz Jaczewski is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 339/19

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV)

(Case T-718/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 339/22

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Directv Group, Inc. (El Segundo, United States) (represented by: F. Valentin, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Bolloré (Ergué Gabéric, France) (represented by: S. Legrand, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 October 2013 (Case R 1812/2012-2) concerning cancellation proceedings between Bolloré and The Directv Group, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant shall bear its costs, including those incurred by the defendant and the other party to the proceedings.

(1) OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/21

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2014 — BS v Commission

(Case T-83/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Social security - Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Rules on insurance against the risks of accident and occupational disease - Principle of collegiality - Legal nature of the dispute - Rate of adverse effect on physical or mental integrity - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2014/C 431/36)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: BS (Messina, Italy) (represented by: C. Pollicino, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and V. Joris, and subsequently by J. Currall, acting as Agents, and D. Gullo, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 in Case F-90/11 BS v Commission, ECR-SC, EU:F:2012:188, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. BS shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the course of the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 448/23

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Khatzithoma v Commission and ECB

(Case T-329/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Cyprus stability support programme - Declaration of the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus - Erroneous identification of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility))

(2014/C 448/30)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Petros Khatzithoma (Makedonitissa, Cyprus); and Elenitsa Khatzithoma (Makedonitissa) (represented by: E. Efstathiou, K. Efstathiou and K. Liasidou, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P. Keppenne and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, acting as Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the declaration of the Eurogroup of 25 March 2013 concerning, inter alia, the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Petros Khatzithoma and Elenitsa Khatzithoma are ordered to pay, in addition to their own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 81/19

Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — SolarWorld and Others v Commission

(Case T-507/13) (1)

((Actions for annulment - Dumping - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from China - Acceptance of an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding - Community industry - Absence of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 081/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: SolarWorld AG (Bonn, Germany); Brandoni solare SpA (Castelfidardo, Italy); Global Sun Ltd (Sliema, Malta); Silicio Solar, SAU (Madrid, Spain); Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, SA (Puertollano, Spain) (represented by: L. Ruessmann, lawyer, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, T. Maxian Rusche and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)

Re:

Action for the annulment of Commission Decision 2013/423/EU of 2 August 2013 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2013 L 209, p. 26), and of Commission Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU of 4 December 2013 confirming the acceptance of an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China for the period of application of definitive measures (OJ 2013 L 325, p. 214).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. SolarWorld AG, Brandoni solare SpA, Global Sun Ltd, Silicio Solar, SAU and Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, SA shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/32

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — LemonAid Beverages v OHIM — Pret a Manger (Europe) (LemonAid)

(Case T-298/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 026/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LemonAid Beverages GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Lüken and J. Natzel, lawyers, and P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Pret a Manger (Europe) Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Tsoutsanis, lawyer, and S. Croxon, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 March 2013 (Case R 276/2012-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Pret à Manger (Europe) Ltd and LemonAid Beverages GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 215, 27.2.2013.