Action brought on 20 December 2017 — Weber -Stephen Products v EUIPO (iGr ill)
(Case T-822/17)
(2018/C 063/22)
Language of the case: Engl ish
Parties
Applicant: Weber -Stephen Products LLC (Palatine, Illinois, Unit ed States) (represented by: R. Niebel and A. Jauch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Proper ty Office (EUIPO)
Detail s of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘iGrill’ — Application for registration No 15 456 726
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 September 2017 in Case R 579/2017-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Cour t should:
—annul the cont ested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Misint erpretation of the lega l requirements of articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation no. 2017/1001.
Action brought on 22 December 2017 — H2O Plus v EUIPO (H 2 O+)
(Case T-824/17)
(2018/C 063/23)
Language of the case: Engl ish
Parties
Applicant: H2O Plus LLC (San Francisco, Calif ornia, United States) (represente d by: R. Niebel and F. Kerl, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Proper ty Office (EUIPO)
Detail s of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurat ive mark containing 
the word elements ‘H 2 O+’ — Inter national registration No W 1 313 244
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 Octob er 2017 in Case R 499/2017-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Cour t should:
—annul the cont ested decision;19.2.2018 EN Official Jour nal of the European Union C 63/17
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Erroneous application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 2017/1001.
Action brought on 27 December 2017 — Aeris Invest v ECB
(Case T-827/17)
(2018/C 063/24)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Aeris Invest Sàrl (Luxem bourg, Luxembourg) (represente d by: R. Vallina Hoset, A. Sellés Marco, C. Iglesias Megías 
and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninc k, lawyers)
Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Cour t should:
—Annul the Decisions of the ECB LS/MD/17/405, LS/PT/17/406 and LS/MD/17/419 of 7 November 2017; and
—Order the ECB to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 8(3) of the Decision of the European Central Bank of 4 March 2004 on 
public access to European Central Bank documents (ECB/2004/3), this action seek s annulment of the Decisions of the 
European Central Bank LS/MD/17/405, LS/PT/17/406 and LS/MD/17/419 of 7 November 2017 relating to conf irmat ory 
requests for access to ECB documents.
In suppor t of the action, the applicant relies upon four pleas in law:
1.First plea in law: Decisions LS/MD/17/405, LS/PT/17/406 and LS/MD/17/419 infringe Article 4(1)(c) of the Access 
Decision inasmuc h as they deny the applicant access to information on the grounds that the documents are claimed to 
be, fully or in part, prot ected by a general presump tion of non-accessibility because they are conf idential documents 
covered by the principle of prof essional secrecy applicable to the institutions.
2.Second plea in law: Decision LS/PT/17/406 infringes the second and sixth indents of Article 4(1)(a) of the Access 
Decision inasmuch as it states that disclosure of Banco Popular ’s use of ELA (emerge ncy liquidity assistance) in the days 
preceding its resolution and of information regard ing its liquidity situation and capital ratios could in fact specif ically sap 
the efficiency of the monetar y policy and financ ial stability of the Union or of a Member State.
3.Third plea in law: Decision LS/PT/17/406 and Decision LS/MD/17/419 infringe the first indent of Article 4(2) of the 
Access Decision by stating that the documents and information request ed are commercially sensitive materi al that could 
affect the commercial interests of the Banco Popular and Banco Santander .C 63/18 EN Official Jour nal of the European Union 19.2.2018