ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/40

Order of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-10/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - EIB staff - Psychological harassment - Inquiry procedure - Report of the Committee of Inquiry - Incorrect definition of psychological harassment - Decision of the President of the EIB not to follow up the complaint))

(2015/C 381/48)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: G. Nuvoli and E. Raimond, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 11 November in De Nicola v EIB (F-52/11, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:243), and seeking that that judgment be set aside.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal.

2. Orders Mr Carlo De Nicola to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 98/45

Order of the General Court of 11 January 2016 — Oase v OHIM — Compo France (AlGo)

(Case T-300/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 098/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Oase GmbH (Hörstel, Germany) (represented by: T. Weeg, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Compo France SAS (Roche-Lez-Beaupré, France) (represented by: J. Meyer, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 February 2015 (Case R 1409/2013-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Compo France SAS and Oase GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.

2. Oase GmbH shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). Compo France SAS shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 48/51

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 December 2015 — E-Control v ACER

(Case T-671/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Opinion on the compliance of national regulatory authorities’ decisions approving the methods of cross-border electricity transmission capacity - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Infringement of the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 048/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control) (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: F. Schuhmacher, lawyer)

Defendant: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Opinion of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators No 09/2015 of 23 September 2015 on the compliance of national regulatory authorities’ decisions approving the methods of allocation of cross-border transmission capacity in the Central-East Europe region with Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 (OJ 2009 L 211, p. 15), and the guidelines on the management and allocation of available transfer capacity of interconnections between national systems contained in Annex I thereto.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 191/45

Order of the General Court of 5 April 2016 — NICO v Council

(Case T-24/15) (1)

(2016/C 191/61)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/47

Order of the General Court of 9 March 2016 — SGP Rechtsanwälte v OHIM — StoryDOCKS (tolino)

(Case T-490/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 156/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: SGP Rechtsanwälte Hero, Langbein, Zwecker PartGmbB (Munich, Germany) (represented by: K. Köklü, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: StoryDOCKS GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: R. Graef and C. Rauda, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2015 (Case R 2042/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Verlag Friedrich Oetinger GmbH, now StoryDOCKS GmbH, and PF&P Rechtsanwälte, now SGP Rechtsanwälte Hero, Langbein, Zwecker PartGmbB.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by SGP Rechtsanwälte Hero, Langbein, Zwecker PartGmbB and StoryDOCKS GmbH.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 April 2016 — Dima v EUIPO (Shape of a box consisting of two open cubes)

(Case T-326/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Form of a box consisting of two open cubes - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 222/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dima Verwaltungs GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Kerkhoff, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: initially A. Graul and A. Schikfo, then A. Graul and M. Fischer acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2015 (Case R 2567/2014-5) concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a box composed of two open cubes as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Dima Verwaltungs GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/21

Order of the General Court of 18 April 2016 — Zhang v EUIPO — K & L Ruppert Stiftung (Anna Smith)

(Case T-295/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Anna Smith - Earlier EU word mark SMITH - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 200/29)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Yongyu Zhang (Manchester, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Steinert, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: K & L Ruppert Stiftung & Co. Handels-KG (Weilheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Kockläuner and O. Nilgen, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2015 (Case R 1559/2014-5) concerning opposition proceedings between K & L Ruppert Stiftung & Co. Handels-KG et M. Yongyu Zhang.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Mr Yongyu Zhang to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 305/35

Order of the General Court of 13 June 2016 — GABO:mi v Commission

(Case T-588/15) (1)

((Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Grant agreements - Suspension of payments - Lifting of the suspension - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 305/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG (Munich (Germany)) (represented by: M. Ahlhaus and C. Mayer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and M. Siekierzyńska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU for annulment, first, of Commission Decisions of 29 July and 19 August 2015 to suspend all payments that might be made to the applicant by Directorates E ‘Health’ and F ‘Bio-economy’ of its Directorate-General (DG) for Research and Innovation, secondly, Commission Decision of 25 August 2015 instructing the coordinator of project Biofector not to transfer any amount to the applicant in the context of that project, thirdly, Commission Decision of 28 August 2015 maintaining the suspension of payments by Directorate E of its DG for Research and Innovation, fourthly, Commission Decision of 15 September 2015 instructing the coordinators of projects ‘The hip trial’ and EU-CERT-ICD not to transfer any amount to the applicant in the context of those projects, fifthly, Commission Decision of 5 October 2015, addressed to the coordinator of project NEMO, to consider the applicant’s costs ineligible and to adjust as a result the payments due to the applicant, sixthly, Commission Decision of 14 October 2015, addressed to the coordinator of project Procardio, to suspend payments to the applicant by Directorate G ‘Energy’ of its DG for Research and Innovation, seventhly, Commission Decisions of 23 October and 6 November 2015 taken in execution of that decision of 28 August 2015 and addressed to the coordinators of projects LENA and Re-liver and, eighthly, Commission Decision of 11 November 2015, addressed to the coordinator of project ENS@T-Cancer, to consider the applicant’s costs ineligible and to adjust as a result the payments due to it.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 270/45

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2016 — Kohrener Landmolkerei and DHG v Commission

(Case T-178/15) (1)

((System of traditional specialities guaranteed - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Letter from the Commission informing the competent national authorities of their late lodging of their opposition measure - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 270/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH (Penig, Germany) and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH (Frohburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Guillem Carrau and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of the decision contained in the letter of 9 February 2015 from the Director of Directorate B ‘Multilateral relations and quality policy’ of the Commission’s ‘Agriculture and rural development’ Directorate General, with the reference Ares (2015)529719, informing the competent German authorities that their opposition measure under Article 51(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1), which was lodged on 5 January 2015, was submitted after the deadline.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/36

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council

(Case T-709/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/62)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 402/46

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — Terna v Commission

(Case T-544/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Union list of projects of common interest - EU financial aid in two projects in the area of trans-European energy networks - Reduction of the financial aid initially granted following an audit - Preparatory measure - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 402/54)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Terna — Rete elettrica nazionale SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Police, L. Di Via, F. Covone and D. Carria, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, L. Di Paolo and A. Tokár, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision which contained the Commission’s letter, of 6 July 2015, reducing the financial aid initially granted in the context of two projects (projects 2009-E255/09-ENER/09/TEN-E-S12.564583 and 2007-E 221/07/2007-TREN/07TEN-E-S07.91403) in the area of trans-European energy networks.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Terna — Rete elettrica nazionale SpA shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 October 2017 — Orthema Service v EUIPO (Gehen wie auf Wolken)

(Case T-620/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Gehen wie auf Wolken - Mark consisting of an advertising slogan - Absolute ground for refusal - Absence of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 454/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Orthema Service GmbH (Rotkreuz, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 September 2015 (Case R 404/2015-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Gehen wie auf Wolken as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Orthema Service GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 7, 11.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/33

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2015 — Othman v Council

(Case T-464/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/50)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/18

Order of the General Court of 28 March 2017 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (Viewty GT)

(Case T-534/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Wulff and U. Hildebrandt, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2015 (Joined Cases R 1937/2014-2 and R 1564/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH and LG Electronics, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. LG Electronics, Inc., is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH.

(1) OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 70/21

Order of the General Court of 12 January 2017 — ACDA and Others v Commission

(Case T-242/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Extension of concession contracts - Motorway investment plan in France - Decision not to raise any objections - Association - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 070/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Automobile club des avocats (ACDA) (Paris, France), Organisation des transporteurs routiers européens (OTRE) (Bordeaux, France), Fédération française des motards en colère (FFMC) (Paris), Fédération française de motocyclisme (Paris), Union nationale des automobile clubs (Paris) (represented by: M. Lesage, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 7850 final of 28 October 2014 on State aid SA.2014/N 38271 — France — Motorway investment plan.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the French Republic.

3. The Automobile club des avocats (ACDA), the Organisation des transporteurs routiers européens (OTRE), the Fédération française des motards en colère (FFMC), the Fédération française de motocyclisme and the Union nationale des automobile clubs shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The French Republic shall bear its own costs in relation to the application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 52/44

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — Airdata v Commission

(Case T-305/15) (1)

(2018/C 052/58)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 293/40

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2017 — Aston Martin Lagonda v EUIPO (Representation of a grille positioned on the front of a motor vehicle)

(Case T-86/15) (1)

(2017/C 293/50)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Bundesverband Glasindustrie and Others v Commission

(Case T-108/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Bundesverband Glasindustrie (Düsseldorf, Germany) and the other 11 applicants whose names are annexed to the order (represented by: U. Soltész and C. von Köckritz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, and subsequently by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents, and by H. Wollmann, lawyer)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH, successor in title to ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH, and of P-D Glasseiden GmbH Oschatz.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Bundesverband Glasindustrie and those of the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex.

4. ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH, successor in title to ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH, and P-D Glasseiden GmbH Oschatz shall bear their own costs of the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2019 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission

(Case T-764/15) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Measures implemented by Germany in favour of Frankfurt Hahn airport - Decision declaring the aid compatible in part with the internal market - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Indirect aid - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 246/20)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Martin-Ehlers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche, K. Herrmann and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Land Rheinland-Pfalz (Germany) (represented by: Professor C. Koenig)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/788 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.32833 (11/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Germany concerning the financing arrangements for Frankfurt Hahn airport put into place in 2009 to 2011 (OJ 2016, L 134, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Deutsche Lufthansa AG shall bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission and of the Land Rheinland-Pfalz.

(1) OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/36

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2016 — Matratzen Concord v EUIPO

(Case T-225/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Ganz schön ausgeschlafen - Mark consisting of an advertising slogan - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly unfounded in law))

(2017/C 022/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Matratzen Concord GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: I. Selting, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and A. Graul, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2016 (Case R 1234/2015-1) concerning an application for registration of the word mark Ganz schön ausgeschlafen as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Matratzen Concord GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 475/25

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2016 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-50/16) (1)

(2016/C 475/38)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/51

Order of the General Court of 7 February 2017 — Starbucks (HK) v EUIPO — Now Wireless (nowwireless)

(Case T-908/16) (1)

(2017/C 112/72)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 53/47

Order of the General Court of 21 December 2016 — fleur ami v EUIPO — 8 seasons design (Lamps)

(Case T-67/16) (1)

(2017/C 053/57)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.