ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 2 September 2020 — DTE Systems v EUIPO Speed-Buster (PedalBox +)

(Case T-801/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark PedalBox + - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Misuse of rights - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly unfounded in law)

(2020/C 371/16)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: DTE Systems GmbH (Recklinghausen, Germany) (represented by: U. Vietmeyer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Speed-Buster GmbH & Co. KG (Sinzig, Germany) (represented by: C. Gries, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2019 (Case R 1934/2018-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Speed-Buster and DTE Systems.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. DTE Systems GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Koopman International v EUIPO — Tinnus Enterprises and Mystic Products (Fluid Distribution Equipment)

(Case T-841/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Suspension of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 348/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by G. van den Bergh and B. Brouwer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by A. Odle, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the provisional decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 September 2019 (Case R 1009/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mystic Products Import & Export and Koopman International, on the one hand, and Tinnus Enterprises, on the other hand.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Koopman International BV shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Tinnus Enterprises LLC.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Order of the General Court of 24 November 2020 — Camerin v Commission

(Case T-367/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Deductions from a retirement pension - Enforcement of a decision of a national court - No need to adjudicate - Liability - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 28/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Laure Camerin (Bastia, France) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment in part of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the Commission of 17 April 2019 regarding the enforcement of a garnishee order issued by a Belgian court, in so far as the PMO reserves the right to deduct from pension payments that the applicant is yet to receive additional amounts within the limits set by Belgian law and, second, compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment in part of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the European Commission of 17 April 2019 regarding the enforcement of a garnishee order.

2. The claim for damages is dismissed as inadmissible.

3. Ms Laure Camerin shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-13/19) (1)

(2020/C 390/69)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 April 2021 — Compass Overseas Holdings and Others v Commission

(Case T-702/19) (1)

(2021/C 252/61)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2021 — ECSEL Joint Undertaking v Personal Health Institute International

(Case T-64/19) (1)

(2021/C 88/60)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 October 2021 — Smiths Group and Siti 1 v Commission

(Case T-714/19) (1)

(2021/C 502/63)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 September 2021 — Bunzl and Others v Commission

(Case T-475/19) (1)

(2021/C 452/60)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 24 November 2022 — Keller Holdings v Commission

(Case T-764/19) (1)

(2023/C 24/113)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 December 2021 — Première Vision v EUIPO — Vente Privee.com (PV)

(Case T-836/19) (1)

(2022/C 109/46)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Order of the President of the General Court of 25 May 2020 — Isopix v Parliament

(Case T-163/20 R and T-163/20 R II)

(Application for interim relief - Public supply contracts - Provision of photography services - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Partial manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility - Urgency - Prima facie case - Balancing of competing interests)

(2020/C 247/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Isopix SA (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented by: P. Van den Bulck and J. Fahner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Wójcik and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Applications under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU requesting, in Case T-163/20 R, suspension of the operation of the Parliament’s decision of 24 March 2020 informing the applicant that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had not been accepted and that the contract had been awarded to another tenderer; and that the General Court order the Parliament to produce the tender analysis report and, in Case T-163/20 R II, suspension of the operation of the Parliament’s decision of 17 April 2020 informing the applicant that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had been rejected on the ground that it did not fulfil the selection criteria relating to financial and economic standing.

Operative part of the order

1. Operation of the European Parliament’s decision of 24 March 2020 informing Isopix SA that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had not been accepted and that the contract had been awarded to another tenderer is suspended.

2. The Parliament shall provide Isopix with a copy of the non-confidential version of the tender analysis report.

3. The application for interim relief in Case T-163/20 R II is dismissed as inadmissible.

4. The orders of 3 April 2020, Isopix v Parliament (T-163/20 R), and of 22 April 2020, Isopix v Parliament (T-163/20 R II) are rescinded.
Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — Tratkowski v Commission

(Case T-14/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Internal Competition COM/2/AD 12/18 (AD 12) - Submission of the application using the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations - Request to be admitted to the competition, lodged at the same time and on a separate sheet of paper, to the Appointing Authority - Eligibility conditions - Decision of the selection board to reject the applicant’s application - Rejection by the selection board of the candidate’s request for re-examination due to it being out of time - Decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to grant the applicant’s request to set aside one of the conditions provided for in the notice of competition in order to admit him to the competition - Challenge to the decision of the Appointing Authority and not to that of the selection board - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 9/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Michal Tratkowski (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Wardyn, Radca Prawny)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 14 March 2019 by which the Appointing Authority of that institution rejected the applicant’s request to be admitted to Internal Competition COM/2/AD 12/18 (AD 12) on the ground that he did not fulfil the condition, laid down in the relevant notice of competition, relating to him holding grade AD 10.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Michal Tratkowski shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 August 2020 — Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v EFSA

(Case T-162/20 R)

(Interim relief - Plant protection products - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Publication of the conclusion on the review conducted by EFSA regarding the reconsideration of the approval of the active substance mancozeb - Request for certain passages to be treated as confidential - Refusal to grant confidential treatment - Application for interim measures - No prima facie case)

(2020/C 371/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Mereu and S. Englebert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (represented by: D. Detken and S. Gabbi, acting as Agents, and by G. Rusconi and O. Cesana, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of EFSA Decision EFSA/LA/DEC/22911258/2020 of 28 January 2020 concerning the request for internal review of the decision relating to the applicant’s requests for confidential treatment of the conclusion on the peer review of the risk assessment of the active substance mancozeb.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.

2. The order of 7 April 2020 made in Case T-162/20 R is cancelled.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 January 2021 — CP v Parliament

(Case T-5/20) (1)

(2021/C 62/63)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 February 2021 — PNB Banka v ECB

(Case T-230/20 R)

(Interim relief - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Application for suspension of operation of an act - No urgency)

(2021/C 138/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PNB Banka AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. Bonnard, V. Hümpfner and C. Hernández Saseta, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere, V. Soņeca and E. Bārdiņš, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of operation of the decision of the ECB of 17 February 2020 withdrawing the applicant’s authorisation.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 January 2021 — Chiquita Brands v EUIPO — Fyffes International (HOYA)

(Case T-189/20) (1)

(2021/C 79/48)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.
Order of the General Court of 8 April 2021 — CRII-GEN and Others v Commission

(Case T-496/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Plant protection products - Active substance glyphosate - Request for review for the purpose of withdrawing or amending the approval - Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Rejection - Act not open to challenge)

(2021/C 228/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Comité de recherche et d’information indépendantes sur le génie génétique (CRII-GEN) (Paris, France), and the 6 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: C. Lepage, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis, G. Gattinara, I. Nagalis and G. Koleva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 17 June 2020 rejecting the applicants’ request, made under Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ 2009 L 309, p. 1), to withdraw or amend the approval of active substance glyphosate.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Bayer Agriculture BV.

3. The Comité de recherche et d’information indépendantes sur le génie génétique (CRII-GEN) and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by Bayer Agriculture relating to its application for leave to intervene.

4. Bayer Agriculture shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Symrise v ECHA

(Case T-655/20 R)

(Application for interim relief - REACH - Substance 2-ethylhexyl salicylate - Compliance check of registrations - Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 163/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Symrise AG (Holzminden, Germany) (represented by: R. Cana, E. Mullier and H. Widemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: W. Broere, N. Knight and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures, first, to suspend implementation of Decision A 010 2018 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 18 August 2020, relating to the applicant’s registration dossier for 2-ethylhexyl salicylate and, second, to order the extension of the prescribed period to communicate the results of the tests for the duration of the suspension.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2021 — Electrodomésticos Taurus v EUIPO — Shenzhen Aukey E-Business (AICOOK)

(Case T-328/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application of a declaratory nature - Application for directions to be issued - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 278/65)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Electrodomésticos Taurus, SL (Oliana, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Shenzhen Aukey E-Business Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2020 (Case R 2212/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Electrodomésticos Taurus and Shenzhen Aukey E-Business.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Electrodomésticos Taurus, SL shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 240, 20.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission

(Case T-139/20) (1)

(2021/C 252/62)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 9 July 2021 — Kozhuvchanka uvoz-izvoz Kavadarci v EUIPO (NASHE MAKEDONSKO PILSNER BEER MACEDONIAN PREMIUM BEER)

(Case T-357/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark NASHE MAKEDONSKO PILSNER BEER MACEDONIAN PREMIUM BEER - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Geographical origin - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 357/39)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: Drushtvo za proizvodvsto, trgovija i uslugi Kozhuvchanka d.o.o. uvoz-izvoz Kavadarci (Kavadarci, North Macedonia) (represented by: A. Ivanova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and P. Angelova Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2020 (Case R 1729/2019-1), relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign NASHE MAKEDONSKO PILSNER BEER MACEDONIAN PREMIUM BEER as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Drushtvo za proizvodvsto, trgovija i uslugi Kozhuvchanka d.o.o. uvoz-izvoz Kavadarci shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2021 — One Voice v ECHA

(Case T-664/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - REACH - Substance 2-ethylhexyl salicylate - Exclusive use for the manufacture of cosmetic products - Compliance check of registrations - Article 41(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Time limit for bringing an action - Article 21(5) of Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 - Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 310/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: One Voice (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Ghersi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: W. Broere and L. Bolzonello, acting as Agents, and by S. Raes, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision A-010-2018 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 18 August 2020, relating to the compliance check of a registration dossier for 2-ethylhexyl salicylate.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. One Voice is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.
Order of the General Court of 27 September 2021 — CNMSE and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-633/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public health - Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 - Conduct of clinical trials with medicinal products for human use containing GMOs - Treatment or prevention of the coronavirus disease SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) - Concept of legislative act - Concept of regulatory act - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 490/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Coordination nationale médicale santé — environnement (CNMSE) (Paris, France) and the five other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: G. Tumerelle, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: J. Etienne and W. Kuzmienko, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Jaume and M. Moore, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 on the conduct of clinical trials with and supply of medicinal products for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms intended to treat or prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) (OJ 2020 L 231, p. 12).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Commission and the non-profit-making association ‘Groupe de Réflexion et d’Action Pour une Politique Ecologique’.

3. The Coordination nationale médicale santé — environnement (CNMSE) and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

4. The Commission and the non-profit-making association ‘Groupe de Réflexion et d’Action Pour une Politique Ecologique’ shall bear the costs relating to their respective applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2021 — SMCK Hair Care Products v EUIPO — Carolina Herrera (COOL GIRL)

(Case T-670/20) (1)

(2021/C 431/67)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Alessio and Others v ECB

(Case T-620/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Recovery and resolution of credit institutions - Early intervention measures - Decision of the ECB to place Banca Carige under temporary administration - Subsequent extension decisions - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Delay - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 95/50)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Roberto Alessio (Turin, Italy) and the 56 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Condinanzi, L. Boggio, M. Cataldo and A. Califano, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta and A. Pizzolla, Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment, first, of the ECB’s decision of 1 January 2019 placing Banca Carige SpA under temporary administration and, secondly, of its decision of 29 March 2019, extending the period of the temporary administration, and of the subsequent extension decisions.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Commission’s application for leave to intervene.

3. Mr Roberto Alessio and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).

4. The Commission shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 390, 16.11.2020.