ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — ArcelorMittal Bremen v Commission

(Case T-623/19) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Decision 2011/278/EU - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances - Amendment of Germany’s national allocation table for 2013-2020 - Significant increase in capacity - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 209/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and L. Buschmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and A. Becker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 265 TFEU for a declaration that the Commission unlawfully refrained from taking a decision concerning the total annual quantity of emissions quotas that must be granted free of charge in response to a significant increase in capacity by a sub-installation of the applicant with a product benchmark for hot metal and, in the alternative, an application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision allegedly adopted by the Commission on 19 July 2019 concerning the giving of notice to the applicant on 1 July 2019.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each part shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Koopman International v EUIPO — Tinnus Enterprises and Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-838/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Suspension of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 348/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: G. van den Bergh and B. Brouwer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervener before the General Court: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: A. Odle, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the provisional decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 September 2019 (Case R 1005/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mystic Products Import & Export and Koopman International, on the one hand, and Tinnus Enterprises, on the other hand.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Koopman International BV shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Tinnus Enterprises LLC.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Order of the General Court of 16 June 2020 — Walker and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-383/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Area of freedom, security and justice - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union - Regulation (EU) 2019/592 amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 - Short-stay visa waiver on the basis of reciprocity - Alleged loss of EU citizenship - Not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 271/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Hilary Elizabeth Walker (Cadiz, Spain), Jennifer Ann Cording (Valdagno, Italy), Douglas Edward Watson (Beaumont, France), Christopher David Randolph (Ballinlassa Belcarra Castlebar, Ireland), Michael Charles Strawson (Serralongue, France) (represented by J. Fouchet, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by D. Warin and R. van de Westelaken, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by S. Cholakova and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Regulation (EU) 2019/592 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 April 2019 amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, as regards the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union (OJ 2019 L 103 I, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of Spain and the European Commission.

3. Ms Hilary Elizabeth Walker, Ms Jennifer Ann Cording, Mr Douglas Edward Watson, Mr Christopher David Randolph and Mr Michael Charles Strawson shall bear their own costs, and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the application for interim measures before the General Court, except those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

4. Ms Walker, Ms Cording, Mr Watson, Mr Randolph and Mr Strawson, the Parliament, the Council, the Kingdom of Spain and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
Order of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — IMG v Commission

(Case T-645/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Development cooperation - Implementing the EU budget in indirect management - Execution of a judgment of the Court of Justice - Commission letter requesting that certain documents be provided - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory measure - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Close link with the claim for annulment - Lis pendens - Inadmissibility - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 378/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: International Management Group (IMG) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and J.-Y. de Cara, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and J. Norris, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the letter of the Commission of 18 July 2019 by which the Commission, in execution of the judgment of 31 January 2019, International Management Group v Commission (C-183/17 P and C-184/17 P, EU:C:2019:78), requests the applicant to provide certain documents and, second, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that letter and of the Commission decisions annulled by that judgment.

Operative part of the judgment

1) The action is dismissed.

2) International Management Group (IMG) is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2020 — Kahimbi Kasagwe v Council

(Case T-117/19) (1)

(2020/C 348/38)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2020 — Broadcom v Commission

(Case T-876/19) (1)

(2021/C 53/87)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 October 2020 — Coppo Gavazzi and Others v Parliament

(Joined Cases T-389/19 to T-394/19, T-397/19, T-398/19, T-403/19, T-404/19, T-406/19, T-407/19, T-409/19 to T-418/19, T-420/19 to T-422/19, T-425/19 to T-427/19, T-429/29 to T-432/19, T-435/19, T-436/19, T-438/19 to T-442/19, T-444/19 to T-446/19, T-448/19 to T-454/19, T-463/19 and T-465/19) (1)

(2021/C 9/48)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2021 — Ryanair and Laudamotion v Commission

(Case T-866/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 - Rules on the distribution of air traffic between Schiphol and Lelystad Airports - Priority for the allocation of slots to Lelystad Airport - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 382/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland), Laudamotion GmbH (Schwechat, Austria) (represented by: E. Vahida and I.G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and W. Mölls, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1585 of 24 September 2019 on the establishment of traffic distribution rules pursuant to Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the airports Amsterdam Schiphol and Amsterdam Lelystad (OJ 2019 L 246, p. 24).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

3. Ryanair DAC and Laudamotion GmbH shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

4. The Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 March 2021 — Aquind and Others v Commission

(Case T-885/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Energy - Trans-European energy infrastructure - Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 - Delegation of power to the Commission - Article 290 TFEU - Delegated act amending the list of projects of common interest of the Union - Nature of the act during the period within which the Parliament and the Council may express objections - Act not open to challenge - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 163/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Aquind Ltd (Wallsend, United Kingdom), Aquind Energy Sàrl, (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Aquind SAS (Rouen, France) (represented by: S. Goldberg, C. Davis, J. Bille, Solicitors, and E. White, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, Y. Marinova and B. De Meester, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller, D. Klebs, S. Heimerl and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. J. Ruiz Sánchez, acting as Agent), French Republic (represented by: A.-L. Desjonquères, C. Mosser and A. Daniel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/389 of 31 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union list of projects of common interest (OJ 2020 L 74, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2. Aquind Ltd, Aquind Energy Sàrl and Aquind SAS shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

3. The Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain and the French Republic shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 November 2021 — Proodeftiki v Commission

(Case T-271/19) (1)

(State aid - Applicant having ceased to reply to the Court’s requests - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 24/46)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Proodeftiki ATE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: M. Panagopoulou, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and L. Haasbeek, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: K. Boskovits), Aftokinitodromos Kentrikis Elladas AE Parachorisis (Odos Kentrikis Elladas AE) (Lamia, Greece) (represented by: E. Bourtzalas and A. Kedikoglou, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 6717 final of 19 October 2018 on State Aid SA.50233 (2018/N) — Greece, declaring the State aid granted by the Hellenic Republic to Aftokinitodromos Kentrikis Elladas AE Parachorisis (Odos Kentrikis Elladas AE) for the construction of the Lamia-Xiniada section of the E65 motorway compatible with the internal market.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Proodeftiki ATE is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Aftokinitodromos Kentrikis Elladas AE Parachorisis (Odos Kentrikis Elladas AE).

3. The Hellenic Republic is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 220, 1.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 September 2021 — Daily Mail and General Trust plc and Others v Commission

(Case T-690/19) (1)

(2021/C 462/74)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 432, 23.12.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 December 2022 — Experian Finance 2012 v Commission

(Case T-771/19) (1)

(2023/C 45/59)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 August 2022 — Silgan International and Silgan Closures v Commission

(Case T-808/19) (1)

(2022/C 389/28)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2020 — IV v Commission

(Case T-145/20) (1)

(2020/C 348/41)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2020 — Buxadé Villalba and Others v Parliament

(Case T-32/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - Member of the Parliament - Acknowledgement by the Parliament of the election as Members of the European Parliament of two Spanish elected representatives - Locus standi of three other Members of the European Parliament - Lack of individual concern - Application for a declaratory judgment - Action partly inadmissible and partly brought before a court that is manifestly incompetent to hear it)

(2021/C 19/53)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Jorge Buxadé Villalba (Madrid, Spain) María Esperanza Araceli Aguilar Pinar (Madrid), Hermann Tertsch Del Valle-Lersundi (Madrid) (represented by: M. Castro Fuertes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the Parliament’s acknowledgment of the election as Members of the European Parliament of Mr Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Antoni Comín i Oliveres, announced by the President of the Parliament at the plenary sitting of 13 January 2020.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action as partly inadmissible and as partly brought before a court that is manifestly incompetent to hear it;

2. Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain and of Mr Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Antoni Comín i Oliveres;

3. Orders Mr Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Mr Hermann Tertsch Del Valle-Lersundi and Ms María Esperanza Araceli Aguilar Pinar to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament;

4. Orders the Kingdom of Spain, Mr Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Comín i Oliveres to bear the costs relating to their respective applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 September 2020 — Datax v REA

(Case T-381/20 R)

(Interim measures - Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Reimbursement of sums paid - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2020/C 399/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Datax sp. z o.o. (Wroclaw, Poland) (represented by: J. Bober, lawyer)

Defendant: Research Executive Agency (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou and V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and by M. Le Berre, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of REA measure Ares(2019) 7018535 of 13 November 2019 concerning project 261659 (HELP) and project 286822 (GreenNets), concerning rejection and recovery of eligible costs and debit notes issued on the basis of that measure.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 31 December 2020 — Aurubis v Commission

(Case T-729/20 R)

(Interim measures - Directive 2003/87/EC - Decision 2011/278/EU - System for greenhouse gas emissions allowance trading - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 62/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Aurubis AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and J. Hoss, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 279 TFEU and Article 156 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, seeking that the Commission be ordered to transfer 1 154 794 emission allowances to the account of the installation of the applicant by 31 December 2020 at the latest.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 1 December 2020 — Tikal Marine Systems v EUIPO — Ultra Safety Systems (Ultra Tef-Gel)

(Case T-192/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 35/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tikal Marine Systems GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany) (represented by: M. Mahnkopf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ultra Safety Systems Inc. (Magonia Park, Florida, United States) (represented by: C. Eckhartt, A. von Mühlendahl and P. Böhner, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2020 (Case R 2499/2018-4), relating to cancellation proceedings between Ultra Safety Systems and Tikal Marine Systems.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Tikal Marine Systems GmbH and Ultra Safety Systems Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.
Order of the General Court of 17 February 2021 — ML v Commission

(Case T-567/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Public procurement - Call for tenders - Sustainable catering services for the Commission in Brussels and its surrounding areas - Rejection of the tender of a tenderer - Annulment of the call for tenders - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 148/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ML (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 30 June 2020 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the context of the call for tenders OIB/2019/CPN/039 concerning sustainable catering services for the Commission in the Brussels-Capital Region and surrounding areas and, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the losses allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

1. There is no longer any need to rule on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay half of the costs incurred by ML.

3. ML shall bear half of its costs.

(1) OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — KC v Commission

(Case T-580/20) (1)

(Action for damages - State aid - Complaint - Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 88/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KC (represented by: L. Frölich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant owing to the Commission’s failure to initiate, in a timely manner, the formal investigation procedure following the applicant’s State aid complaint (SA.46963).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1) Dismisses the action;

2) Orders KC to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 414, 30.11.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 May 2021 — Da Silva Carreira v Commission

(Case T-260/20) (1)

(2021/C 252/66)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.
Order of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — 3M Belgium v ECHA

(Case T-160/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - REACH - Identification of perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) and of its salts as a substance of very high concern - Inclusion in the list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Time limit for bringing an action - Article 59(10) of Regulation No 1907/2006 - Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 182/72)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: 3M Belgium (Diegem, Belgium) (represented by: J.-P. Montfort and T. Delille, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Decision ECHA/01/2020 of ECHA of 16 January 2020 concerning the inclusion of perfluorobutanesulfonic acid and its salts in the list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1, corrigendum OJ 2007 L 136, p. 3).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC).

3. 3M Belgium shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.

4. 3M Belgium, ECHA and CEFIC shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.