ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 380/12

Order of the Court of 2 September 2014 — Borghezio v Parliament

(Case T-336/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Declaration of the President of the European Parliament, in plenary session, informing the assembly of the exclusion of an MEP from the political group to which he was attached - Act not amenable to review - Action manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 380/16

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mario Borghezio (Turin, Italy) (represented by: H. Laquay, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N. Görlitz and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Parliament, in the form of a declaration of its President on 10 July 2013, in plenary session, according to which the applicant was, since 3 June 2013, sitting as a non-attached MEP, as a result of his exclusion from the political group ‘Europe of Freedom & Democracy’ as from that date.

Operative part

1) The action is dismissed.

2) Mr Mario Borghezio shall bear his own costs, and pay those of the European Parliament, including those incurred in the interim relief proceedings.

(1) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/23

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Shire Pharmaceutical Contracts v Commission

(Case T-583/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Medicinal products for paediatric use - Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 - Article 37 - Extension of the period of market exclusivity of off-patent orphan medicinal products - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility))

(2014/C 431/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Shire Pharmaceutical Contracts Ltd (Hampshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Bacon, Barrister, M. Utges Manley and M. Vickers, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and V. Walsh, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision purportedly contained in the letter which the Commission sent to the applicant on 2 September 2013, as subsequently confirmed by the letter of 18 October 2013, concerning whether the medicinal product Xagrid was eligible for the reward provided for in Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (OJ 2006 L 378, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Shire Pharmaceutical Contracts Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 377, 21.12.2013.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — Meda v OHIM — Takeda (PANTOPREM)

(Case T-647/13) (1)

(2015/C 016/70)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/26

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2015 — GEA Group AG v OHIM (engineering for a better world)

(Case T-488/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Time-limit for instituting proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Notification of the decision of the Board of Appeal by fax - Receipt of the fax - Lateness - No force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 089/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: GEA Group AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J. Schneiders, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially by A. Pohlmann, and subsequently by S. Hanne, Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 March 2013 (Case R 935/2012-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign ‘engineering for a better world’ as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. GEA Group AG shall bear the costs.

(1) OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/18

Order of the General Court of 21 November 2014 — Kinnarps v OHIM (MAKING LIFE BETTER AT WORK)

(Case T-697/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark MAKING LIFE BETTER AT WORK - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action in part manifestly unfounded in law and in part manifestly inadmissible))

(2015/C 056/25)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Kinnarps AB (Kinnarp, Sweden) (represented by: M. Wahlin, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Melander and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 October 2013 (Case R 2272/2012-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign MAKING LIFE BETTER AT WORK as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Kinnarps AB is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 93, 29.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/26

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2015 — PAN Europe and Confédération paysanne v Commission

(Case T-671/13) (1)

(2015/C 228/35)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/12

Order of the General Court of 30 March 2015 — Square v OHIM — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (SQUARE)

(Case T-213/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 178/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Square, Inc. (San Fransisco, United States) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (Tarbes, France) (represented by: A. Lecomte and R. Zeineh, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 January 2013 (Case R 775/2012-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne and Square, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.

2. The applicant shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 145/28

Order of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Colomer Italy v OHIM — Farmaca International (INTERCOSMO ESTRO)

(Case T-681/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 145/35)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Colomer Italy SpA (Sala Bolognese, Italy) (represented by: M. Ricolfi, F. Tarocco and C. Mezzetti, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Farmaca International SpA (Torino, Italy) (represented by: M. Caramelli and S. Fierro, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 October 2013 (Case R 1186/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Farmaca International SpA and Colomer Italy SpA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Colomer Italy SpA and Farmaca International SpA are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, half of the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

(1) OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/57

Order of the General Court of 28 August 2015 — Bimbo v OHIM — Kimbo (KIMBO)

(Case T-568/13) (1)

(2015/C 381/67)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
Order of the General Court of 20 April 2021 — Inclusion Alliance for Europe v Commission

(Case T-539/13 RENV) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - MARE, Senior and ECRN projects - Commission decision to recover sums unduly paid - Applicant which has stopped responding to the Court’s requests - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 242/63)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE (Bucharest, Romania)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Moro, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 4693 final of 17 July 2013 concerning the recovery from the applicant of the total sum of EUR 212 411,89, plus interest, that had been paid to it in the context of the MARE, Senior and ECRN projects, and, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU, seeking compensation for the material and non-material harm which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission and Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE shall bear their own costs relating to the proceedings in Cases T-539/13, C-378/16 P-R, C-378/16 P and T-539/13 RENV.

(1) OJ C 15, 18.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/55

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2017 — Meta Group v Commission

(Joined Cases T-34/13 and T-35/13) (1)

(2017/C 283/86)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/30

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — National Iranian Tanker Company v Council

(Case T-207/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case - Balancing of interests - No urgency))

(2015/C 320/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: National Iranian Tanker Company (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: T. de la Mare QC, M. Lester, J. Pobjoy, Barristers, R. Chandrasekera, S. Ashley and C. Murphy, Solicitors)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: N. Rouam and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/236 of 12 February 2015 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2015 L 39, p. 18) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/230 of 12 February 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2015 L 39, p. 3), in so far as each applies to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/20

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 May 2015 — Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council

(Case T-153/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds and restriction on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 221/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Mohamad Hamcho (Damascus, Syria); and Hamcho International (Damascus) (represented by: A. Boesch, D. Amaudruz and M. Ponsard, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the measures imposed on the applicants under Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 2), and of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/117 of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 85).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 27/57

Order of the General Court of 24 November 2015 — Delta Group agroalimentare v Commission

(Case T-163/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Italian market in poultrymeat - Exceptional support measures to resolve specific problems concerning the poultrymeat sector in Italy - Export refunds for poultrymeat destined for certain African countries - Rejection of the applicant’s request for exceptional measures - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 027/74)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Delta Group agroalimentare Srl (Porto Viro, Italy) (represented by: V. Migliorini, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Schima and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 9 February 2015 (Ref. Ares (2015) 528512), sent in reply to the applicant’s request for the adoption of exceptional support measures for the poultrymeat market on the basis of Article 219(1) or of Article 221 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Delta Group agroalimentare shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 178, 1.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/61

Order of the General Court of 5 August 2015 — Parker Hannifin Manufacturing and Parker-Hannifin v Commission

(Case T-137/15) (1)

(2015/C 381/86)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) C 190, 8.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 98/44

Order of the General Court of 15 January 2016 — TMG Landelijke Media and Willems v Commission

(Case T-189/15) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Correspondence between the Dutch authorities and the Commission concerning the annual adjustment of the Netherlands’ contribution to the EU budget, made on the basis of gross national income - Partial refusal of access - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 098/58)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: TMG Landelijke Media BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) and Menzo Willems (Voorburg, Netherlands) (represented by: R.S. Le Poole and L. Broers, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 17 February 2015 refusing, in part, to grant Mr Willems access to the documents relating to correspondence between the Commission and the Dutch authorities concerning the annual adjustment of the Netherlands’ contribution to the European Union budget.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by TMG Landelijke Media BV and Mr Menzo Willems.

(1) OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 48/51

Order of the President of the General Court of 7 December 2015 — POA v Commission

(Case T-584/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Publication of an application for registration of a protected designation of origin - ‘Halloumi’ or ‘Hellim’ - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2016/C 048/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pagkiprios organismos ageladotrofon Dimosia Ltd (POA) (Latsia, Cyprus) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis and J. Guillem Carrau, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the measure adopted by the Commission dated 28 July 2015 entitled ‘Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs’ (OJ 2015 C 246, p. 9).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 191/32

Order of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — CBM v OHIM — ÏD Group (Fashion ID)

(Case T-535/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 191/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken and J. Bärenfänger, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: ÏD Group (Roubaix, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2015 (Case R 2470/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between ÏD Group and CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

(1) OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/54

Order of the General Court of 8 March 2016 — Hmicho v Council

(Case T-275/15) (1)

(2016/C 156/74)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 April 2016 — DHL Express (France) v EUIPO — Chronopost (WEBSHIPPING)

(Case T-142/15) (1)

(2016/C 222/44)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 171, 26.5.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/25

Order of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — Novartis v OHIM — SK Chemicals (Representation of a patch)

(Case T-592/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 200/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: SK Chemicals GmbH (Eschborn, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 August 2015 (Case R 2342/2014-5), concerning cancellation proceedings between SK Chemicals GmbH and Novartis AG.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Novartis AG and SK Chemicals GmbH.

(1) OJ C 414, 14.12.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 305/35

Order of the General Court of 22 June 2016 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EMA

(Case T-440/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Public service contracts - Processing of online transactions - External service provision for software applications - Multiple framework cascade contract EMA/2012/10/ICT - Request for services sent to the applicants - Insertion of new criteria - Subject matter of the action ceasing to exist - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 305/48)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece), and European Dynamics Belgium SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: I. Ampazis, M. Sfyri, C.-N. Dede and D. Papadopoulou, and subsequently M. Sfyri, C.-N. Dede and D. Papadopoulou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: T. Jablonski, N. Rampal Olmedo, G. Gavriilidou and P.A. Eyckmans, Agents)

Subject matter

Application based on Article 272 TFEU and seeking a declaration concerning the insertion, in EMA’s request S C 002 of 22 May 2015 to provide services, of new criteria which did not feature in the technical specifications for tender EMA/20l1/l7/ICT, Annex I to framework contract EMA/2012/l0/ICT.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and European Dynamics Belgium SA shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 270/67

Order of the General Court of 31 May 2016 — Laboratorios Thea v EUIPO — Sebapharma (Sebacur)

(Case T-84/15) (1)

(2016/C 270/74)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/20

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — Sogepa v Commission

(Case T-761/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Crystal-ware - Aid in the form of a loan - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Obligation to recover the aid granted to an insolvent undertaking - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 410/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société wallonne de gestion et de participations (Sogepa) (Liège, Belgium) (represented by: A. Lepièce and H. Baeyens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, L. Armati and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of Articles 3 to 6 of Commission decision (EU) 2015/1825 of 31 July 2014 on non-notified State aid SA.34791 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Belgium — Rescue aid for Val Saint-Lambert SA (OJ 2015 L 269, p. 47).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. Société wallonne de gestion et de participations (Sogepa) is ordered to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.