Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 1997. - Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic. - Failure to fulfil obligations - Failure to transpose Directive 92/43/EEC. - Case C-329/96.



European Court reports 1997 Page I-03749



Parties

Grounds

Decision on costs

Operative part



Keywords

Member States - Obligations - Implementation of directives - Failure to fulfil obligations not contested

(EC Treaty, Art. 169)

Parties

In Case C-329/96,

Commission of the European Communities, represented by Maria Condou Durande, of its Legal Service, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg,

applicant,

v

Hellenic Republic, represented by Evi Skandalou, Legal Assistant, First Class, in the Special European Community Legal Service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, assisted by Nana Daphniou, Legal Assistant, Second Class, in the same Service, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Greek Embassy, 117 Val Sainte-Croix,

defendant,

APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing, within the prescribed period, to adopt and/or notify to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and that directive,

THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber),

composed of: J.C. Moitinho de Almeida, President of the Chamber, L. Sevón, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), D.A.O. Edward and P. Jann, Judges,

Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs,

Registrar: R. Grass,

having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,

after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 24 April 1997,

gives the following

Judgment

Grounds

1 By application lodged at the Court Registry on 8 October 1996, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC Treaty for a declaration that, by failing, within the prescribed period, to adopt and/or notify to it the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7, hereinafter `the Directive'), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and that directive.

2 Member States were required under Article 23 of the Directive to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with it within two years of its notification and forthwith to inform the Commission thereof. Since the Directive was notified to the Greek authorities on 5 June 1992, the period laid down for its implementation expired on 5 June 1994.

3 Noting that this period had expired, and not having been informed of the measures for transposing the Directive into Greek law, the Commission initiated proceedings for a declaration of failure to fulfil obligations under Article 169 of the Treaty. By letter of 9 August 1994 it put the Greek Government on formal notice to submit to it its observations within two months.

4 Since the Greek Government did not reply to that letter, the Commission sent to it, on 21 June 1995, a reasoned opinion requesting it to adopt the measures necessary for compliance within two months of notification.

5 In the absence of any notification of transposition measures by the Hellenic Republic, the Commission brought the present action.

6 In its defence the Greek Government does not deny that the Directive was not transposed within the prescribed period. It merely points out that the delay in transposing the Directive has been attributable to technical legislative problems.

7 Since the Directive was not transposed within the period which it prescribed, the action brought by the Commission must be held to be well founded.

8 It must accordingly be held that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 23 thereof.

Decision on costs

Costs

9 Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs. Since the Hellenic Republic has been unsuccessful, it must be ordered to pay the costs.

Operative part

On those grounds,

THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

hereby:

1. Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 23 thereof;

2. Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.