ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2019 — Le Pen v Parliament

(Case T-211/19) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Member of the European Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Decision waiving parliamentary immunity - Expiry of an MEP’s mandate - No further interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 432/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-Marie Le Pen (Saint-Cloud, France) (represented by F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by N. Görlitz and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of European Parliament Decision P8_TA(2019)0136 of 12 March 2019, waiving the applicant’s parliamentary immunity.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.
Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Cham Holding and Bena Properties v Council

(Case T-55/19) (1)

(Action for compensation - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Lack of competence)

(2019/C 399/77)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Cham Holding Co. SA (Damascis, Syria) and Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by A. Jaume and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the adoption of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16) and its subsequent implementing acts, and as a result of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 of 17 May 2019 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2019 L 132, p. 36), in so far as those decisions concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Cham Holding Co. SA and Bena Properties Co. SA shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Order of the General Court of 17 December 2019 — Societá Agricola Tenuta di Rimale and Others v Commission

(Case T-210/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Common agricultural policy - Binding rules relating to the regulation of the supply of cheese benefiting from a protected designation of origin - Refusal of the application for the adoption of implementing acts - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 61/55)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Societá Agricola Tenuta di Rimale (Fidenza, Italy) and the 9 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Libertini, A. Scognamiglio and M. Spolidoro, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 6 February 2019 (Ares(2019) 677860) refusing the applicants’ application for (i) a declaration as to the alleged infringement by the Italian authorities of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671) and of Article 101 TFEU; and (ii) the adoption by the Commission of implementing acts, on the basis of Article 150(8) of that regulation, requiring that the Italian Republic repeal rules relating to the regulation of the supply of Parmigiano Reggiano cheese for the period 2017-2019.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Societá Agricola Tenuta di Rimale and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Order of the General Court of 18 November 2019 — Dickmanns v EUIPO

(Case T-181/19) (1)

(Civil Service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contract with a termination clause - Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition - Purely confirmatory act - Time limit for complaints - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 19/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sigrid Dickmanns (Gran Alacant, Spain) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukosiütè, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the decision of EUIPO of 4 June 2018 rejecting the applicant’s requests to remove the termination clause in Article 5 of her contract, reclassify her contract as a contract of indefinite duration, withdraw, if necessary, the decision of 14 December 2017 and grant a second contract extension beyond 30 September 2018 or, at least, include her in the procedure for a second renewal of temporary agent contracts in accordance with the guidelines for the renewal of temporary agent contracts of 28 January 2016 and, second, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sigrid Dickmanns.

(1) OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.
Order of the President of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Gerber v Parliament and Council

(Case T-326/19 R)

(Interim measures - EU customs territory - Regulation (EU) 2019/474 - Directive (EU) 2019/475 - Inclusion of the municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano - Application for interim measures - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 137/77)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Tibor Gerber (Campione d’Italia, Italy) (represented by: N. Amadei, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and C. Biz, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Lo Monaco and E. Ambrosini, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 278 TFEU seeking suspension of the operation, first, of Regulation (EU) 2019/474 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ 2019 L 83, p. 38), and, secondly, of Council Directive (EU) 2019/475 of 18 February 2019 amending Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC as regards the inclusion of the Italian municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the customs territory of the Union and in the territorial application of Directive 2008/118/EC (OJ 2019 L 83, p. 42).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is refused.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Bartolomé Alvarado and Grupo Preciados Place v EUIPO — Alpargatas (ALPARGATUS PASOS ARTESANALES)

(Case T-606/19) (1)

(2020/C 77/85)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.
Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — ZU v EEAS

(Case T-499/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Sick leave - Negative opinion by the medical service - Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system - Acts not amenable to review - Acts not adversely affecting an official - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Premature challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 191/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: R. Spac and S. Marquardt, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the alleged decisions of the EEAS of 31 August 2018 and 10 January 2019, of the European Commission note of 30 August 2018 providing for a reduction of the applicant’s sick leave and, so far as necessary, of the Commission’s decision of 1 April 2019 rejecting his complaint of 30 November 2018 against that note and against any subsequent decision to deduct his absence from 28 to 31 August 2018 from his annual leave.

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. ZU shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin Bussiliikenne v Commission

(Case T-603/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2020/C 175/36)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by O. Hyvönen and N. Rosenlund, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by M. Huttunen and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: the Republic of Finland (represented by J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFUE seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 3152 final of 28 June 2019 on the State aid SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by the Republic of Finland for the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected;

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB and on the request for confidential treatment by the European Commission;
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2020 — TestBioTech v Commission

(Case T-534/19) (1)

(2020/C 262/52)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 April 2020 — Axactor v EUIPO — Axa (AXACTOR)

(Case T-594/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 209/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Axactor SE (Oslo, Norway) (represented by: D. Stone, A. Dykes, A. Leonelli, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Axa SA (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Martini-Berthon, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 June 2019 (Case R 479/2018-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Axa SA and Axactor SE.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Axactor SE and Axa SA shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2020 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND)

(Case T-616/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark WONDERLAND - Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 348/20)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz and M. Breuer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium BV (Breda, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Tiemann and C. Elkemann, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 July 2019 (Case R 2164/2018-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium and Katjes Fassin.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG shall pay its own costs and those incurred, in connection with the present proceedings, by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium BV.

(1) OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2020 — Luz Saúde v EUIPO — Clínica La Luz (HOSPITAL DA LUZ LEARNING HEALTH)

(Case T-558/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the EU figurative mark HOSPITAL DA LUZ LEARNING HEALTH - Earlier national figurative mark clínica LALUZ - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 271/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Luz Saúde, SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: G. Moreira Rato, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Clínica La Luz, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2019 (Case R 2239/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Clínica La Luz and Luz Saúde.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Luz Saúde, SA is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 319, 23.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 August 2020 — Frank Recruitment Group Services Ltd v EUIPO — Pearson (PEARSON FRANK)

(Case T-735/19) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 378/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Frank Recruitment Group Services Ltd (Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Dennis, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pearson Plc (London, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 August 2019 (Case R 1884/2018-4) regarding opposition proceedings between Pearson Plc and Frank Recruitment Group Services Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Frank Recruitment Group Services Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) are ordered to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 432, 23.12.2019.
Order of the General Court of 14 July 2020 — Shindler and Others v Commission

(Case T-627/19) (1)

(Actions for failure to act and for annulment - Area of freedom, security and justice - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Applications for the adoption of a decision maintaining the European citizenship of certain UK nationals and of a decision on various measures relating to the rights of UK nationals - Adoption of a position by the Commission - No invitation to act - Refusal to adopt a decision maintaining the European citizenship of certain UK nationals - No interest in bringing proceedings - Action manifestly inadmissible)

(2020/C 348/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Harry Shindler (Porto d’Ascoli, Italy) and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex (represented by: J. Fouchet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, C. Giolito and E. Montaguti, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application (i) under Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully refrained from adopting, on the one hand, a decision maintaining, as from the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, the European citizenship of certain UK nationals who did not, at that time, have the nationality of an EU Member State, irrespective of whether or not an agreement setting out the arrangements of that withdrawal was concluded, and, on the other hand, a decision on various measures relating to the rights of those nationals, should such withdrawal take place without such an agreement having been concluded and (ii) seeking annulment, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, of the letter of the Commission of 11 September 2019 refusing to adopt a decision maintaining the European citizenship of those nationals.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Harry Shindler and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

3. The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Universität Bremen v REA

(Case T-660/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Grant proposal - Horizon Europe - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation - Call for proposals H2020-SC6-Governance-2019 - REA decision rejecting a proposal - No representation by a lawyer - Manifest inadmissibility of the action)

(2021/C 53/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Universität Bremen (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: Professor C. Schmid, University Professor)

Defendants: Research Executive Agency (REA) (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou and V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and by R. van der Hout and C. Wagner, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of REA decision Ares(2019) 4590599 of 16 July 2019, rejecting the proposal presented by the applicant within the framework of the call for proposals H2020-SC6-Governance-2019.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Universität Bremen shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the Research Executive Agency (REA).

(1) OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 October 2020 — Gáspár v Commission

(Case T-827/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Transfer of national pension rights - Complaint brought after the expiry of the three-month period laid down in Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - No excusable error - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 19/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Norbert Gáspár (Mensdorf, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Wardyn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 23 May 2018 confirming the transfer to the pension scheme of the EU institutions of pension rights acquired by the applicant prior to his entry into the service of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Norbert Gáspár shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 July 2021 — Coravin v EUIPO — Cora (CORAVIN)

(Case T-500/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Declaration of revocation of the earlier national mark on which the contested decision is based - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 401/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Coravin, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: F. Valentin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cora (Marne-la-Vallée, France) (represented by: M. Georges-Picot, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 April 2019 (affaire R 2385/2016-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Cora and Coravin.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The parties shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Frutas Tono v EUIPO — Agrocazalla (Marién)

(Case T-587/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Response lodged out of time - Refusal to grant leave to intervene under Article 173(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Cancellation of the earlier word mark serving as a basis for the contested decision - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 163/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Frutas Tono, SL (Benifairó de la Valldigna, Spain) (represented by: A. Cañizares Doménech, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Agrocazalla, SL (Lorca, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 June 2019 (Case R 171/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Agrocazalla and Frutas Tono.

Operative part of the order

1. Agrocazalla, SL is not granted leave to participate in the proceedings.

2. Agrocazalla shall bear its own costs.

3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

4. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 November 2021 — Vodafone Group and Others v Commission

(Case T-491/19) (1)

(2022/C 24/64)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 August 2021 — Rentokil Initial and Rentokil Initial 1927 v Commission

(Case T-692/19) (1)

(2021/C 462/75)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 432, 23.12.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 December 2022 — St Schrader Holding Company UK v Commission

(Case T-782/19) (1)

(2023/C 45/61)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — The Weir Group and Others v Commission

(Case T-718/19) (1)

(2022/C 432/48)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.