ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 179/15

Order of the General Court of 8 April 2011 — Martin v Commission

(Case T-291/10) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Explicit decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 179/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Anne Martin (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: U. O’Dwyer, solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and C. ten Dam, agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: S. Juul Jørgensen, agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's implied decision of 20 April 2010 refusing the applicant access to the documents in the file relating to the State aid N 654/2008, notified by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on 19 December 2008, in favour of Short Brothers plc.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on this action.

2. Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Anne Martin.

3. Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/21

Order of the General Court of 31 August 2011 — IEM v Commission

(Case T-435/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Fourth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration - Application for the reimbursement of sums paid in advance under a research financing contract - Arbitration clause - Letter notifying the issuing of a debit note - Reminder letter - Acts inseparable from the contract - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 319/45

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: IEM — Erga — Erevnes — Meletes perivallontos kai chorotaxias AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Sofokleous, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Sauka, Agents)

Re:

Action, first, for the annulment of the Commission's letter of 7 May 2010 notifying the applicant of the issuing of a debit note for the reimbursement of the sum of EUR 105 416,47, corresponding to the sums paid in advance to the applicant by Parthénon AE Oikodomikon — Technikon — Touristikon — Viomichanikon — Emporikon kai Exagogikon Ergasion pursuant to Contract FAIR-CT98-9544 concluded in the context of the fourth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration and, second, for the annulment of the Commission's letter of 14 July 2010 reminding the applicant of the principal outstanding sum, claimed in debit note No 3241004968.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. IEM — Erga — Erevnes — Meletes perivallontos kai chorotaxias AE is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/49

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2011 — SNCF v OHIM — Infotrafic (infotrafic)

(Case T-491/10) (1)

2011/C 282/91

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/24

Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — Unilever Espãna and Unilever v OHIM — Med Trans G. Poulias-S. Brakatselos (MED FRIGO S.A.)

(Case T-287/10) (1)

2012/C 6/44

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 331/28

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Condé v Council

(Case T-210/10) (1)

2011/C 331/54

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 133/26

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2012 — Ebro Foods v Commission

(Case T-234/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme allowing the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of the aid - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 133/50

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Ebro Foods, SA, formerly Ebro Puleva, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Munõz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ebro Foods, SA shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 80/18

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2012 — Groupe Partouche v Commission

(Case T-315/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Concentrations - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market - Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 80/31

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Groupe Partouche (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-J. Sebag, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan, F. Ronkes Agerbeek and N. von Lingen, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: La Française des Jeux (Boulogne-Billancourt, France); and Groupe Lucien Barrière (Paris, France) (represented by: D. Théophile and P. Mèle, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 3333 of 21 May 2010 declaring the concentration operation for the acquisition by La Française des Jeux and Groupe Lucien Barrière of joint control over the undertaking Newco (Case COMP/M.5786 — Française des Jeux/Groupe Lucien Barrière/JV) to be compatible with the internal market and the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Groupe Partouche shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, La Française des Jeux and Groupe Lucien Barrière.

(1) OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/26

Order of the General Court of 4 December 2012 — Rubinetterie Flero v Commission

(Case T-370/10) (1)

2013/C 32/43

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/23

Order of the General Court of 13 July 2012 — Embraer and Others v Commission

(Case T-75/10) (1)

2012/C 273/39

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/72

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2014 — Seatech International and Others v Council and Commission

(Case T-337/10) (1)

2014/C 315/117

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/51

Order of the General Court of 5 July 2013 — SK Hynix v Commission

(Joined Cases T-148/10 and T-149/10) (1)

2013/C 260/92

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 424/35

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Luxembourg v Commission

(Case T-109/10) (1)

((Action for annulment - EDRF - Reduction in financial aid - Programme Interreg II/C ‘Rhine-Meuse flood’ - Failure to comply with the time limit for adopting a decision - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action manifestly well founded))

(2017/C 424/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented intially by: C. Schiltz, then by: P. Franzen, subsequently by: L. Delvaux and D. Holderer and finally by: D. Holderer, acting as Agents, and P. Kinsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: W. Roels and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented initially by: M. Jacobs and T. Materne, subsequently by: M. Jacobs, and finally by: M. Jacobs and J.-C. Halleux, acting as Agents); French Republic (represented initially by: G. de Bergues and B. Messmer, subsequently by: G. de Bergues and finally by: J. Bousin and D. Colas, acting as Agents) and the Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented initially by: C. Wissels, M. Noort and Y. de Vries and subsequently by: M. Noort, M. Bulterman and B. Koopman, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10712 of 23 December 2009 on the reduction in the financial aid granted to the Rhine-Meuse flood protection programme under Community initiative programme Interreg II/C in the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) pursuant to Commission Decision C(97)3742 of 18 December 1997 — (ERDF No 970010008) insofar as it applies to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

Operative part of the order

1. Commission Decision C(2009) 10712 of 23 December 2009 on the reduction in the financial aid granted to the Rhine-Meuse flood protection programme under Community initiative programme Interreg II/C in the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) pursuant to Commission Decision C(97)3742 of 18 December 1997 — (ERDF No 970010008) is annulled insofar as it applies to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

2. The European Commission shall pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

3. The Kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 127/39

Order of the General Court of 18 February 2015 — Acron and Dorogobuzh v Council

(Case T-582/10) (1)

(2015/C 127/52)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 55, 19.2.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/28

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2011 — Seka Yapo and Others v Council

(Case T-192/11) (1)

2011/C 319/61

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/23

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 July 2011 — Cemex and Others v Commission

(Case T-292/11 R)

(Interim measures - Competition - Request for information Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Application for suspension of application - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 282/48

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Cemex S.A.B. de C.V. (Monterrey, Mexico), New Sunward Holding BV (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Cemex España, SA (Madrid, Spain), CEMEX Deutschland AG (Ratingen, Germany), Cemex UK (Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom), CEMEX Czech Operations s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic), Cemex France Gestion (Rungis, France) and CEMEX Austria AG (Langenzersdorf, Austria) (represented by: J. Folguera Crespo, P. Vidal Martínez, H. González Durántez and B. Martínez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, F. Castilla Contreras and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Rivas, lawyer)

Re:

Application for suspension of application of Commission Decision C(2001) 2360 final of 30 March 2011 in proceedings pursuant to Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39.520 — Cement and related products).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for suspension of application is rejected.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2011 — Leopardi Dittajuti v OHIM — Llopart Vilarós (CONTE LEOPARDI DITTAJUTI)

(Case T-303/11) (1)

(2012/C 25/126)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/33

Order of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Complex v OHIM — Kajometal (KX)

(Case T-206/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Refusal of registration - Withdrawal of application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 347/56

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Complex S.A. (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: R. Rumpel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Kajometal s.r.o. (Dolný Kubín, Slovakia)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 January 2011 (Case R 864/2010-2) in opposition proceedings between Complex S.A. and Kajometal s.r.o.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 80/19

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 January 2012 — Henkel and Henkel France v Commission

(Case T-607/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Commission decision refusing to transmit documents to a national competition authority - Application for interim measures - No interest in bringing proceedings - Disregard of formal requirements - Measures requested not provisional in character - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 80/32

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany); and Henkel France (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: R. Polley, T. Kuhn, F. Brunet and É. Paroche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan and P.J.O. Van Nuffel, Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures in relation to the Commission’s decision of 30 September 2011 (Case COMP/39.579 — Consumer detergents — and Case 09/0007 F) dismissing the request of the French competition authority that the Commission transfer to it, in the context of Case 09/0007 F concerning the French detergents sector, a number of documents produced in Case COMP/39.579.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/14

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2011 — Fellah v Council

(Case T-255/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Withdrawal of the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 39/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Zakaria Fellah (New York, USA) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Defendant(s): Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and G. Étienne, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Decision 2011/221/CFSP of 6 April 2011 amending Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 20) and of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 10).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay the costs.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene made by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/16

Order of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Fortress Participations v OHIM — FIG and Fortress Investment Group (FORTRESS)

(Case T-314/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 200/34

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fortress Participations BV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented, initially, by: L.J. van de Braak, avocat, B. Ladas, Solicitor, and S. Malynicz, Barrister, then, by: L.J. van de Braak, S. Malynicz, R. Black, Solicitor, and V. Baxter, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: FIG LLC (New York, United States); and Fortress Investment Group (UK) Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Gray and R. Mallinson, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 April 2011 (Case R 354/2009-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between FIG LLC and Fortress Investment Group (UK), on the one hand, and Fortress Participations BV, on the other.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The interveners are ordered to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 118/25

Order of the General Court of 17 February 2012 — Dagher v Council

(Case T-218/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted having regard to the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate - Non-contractual liability)

2012/C 118/43

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Habib Roland Dagher (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) (represented by: J.-Y. Dupeux and F. Dressen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and E. Dumitriu-Segnana, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and M. Konstantinides, acting as Agents)

Re:

Firstly, annulment of Council Decision 2011/71/CFSP of 31 January 2011, amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 28, p. 60) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 85/2011 of 31 January 2011, implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 of 12 April 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire (OJ L 28, p. 32), in so far as the applicant's name has been placed on the list of persons and entities to which those restrictive measures apply and, secondly, a claim for damages

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the application for annulment of Council Decision 2011/71/CFSP of 31 January 2011, amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 85/2011 of 31 January 2011, implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 of 12 April 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire.

2. The claim for damages is dismissed.

3. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs relating to the application for annulment.

4. The applicant shall pay the costs relating to the claim for damages.

5. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 179, 18.6.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/23

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Royal Mediterranea (THAI SPA)

(Case T-663/11) (1)

2012/C 273/42

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 227/21

Order of the General Court of 18 June 2012 — Transports Schiocchet — Excursions v Council and Commission

(Case T-203/11) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Coach and bus services between Member States - Regulation (EEC) No 684/92 - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Lack - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2012/C 227/34

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Transports Schiocchet — Excursions (Beuvillers, France) (represented by: É. Deshoulières, lawyer)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Karlsson and E. Dumitriu-Segnana, Agents) and European Commission (represented by: G. Rozet and N. Yerrell, Agents)

Re:

Application for compensation for the damage purportedly suffered by the applicant by reason of the application of the system laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 684/92 of 16 March 1992 on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus (OJ 1992 L 74, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Transports Schiocchet — Excursions shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 186, 25.6.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 399/22

Order of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-442/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Act not subject to review - Act which is confirmatory, in part, and informative, in part - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Failure to identify the alleged conduct or to define the alleged damage - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Absence of proof of damage - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2012/C 399/41

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and D. Calciu, acting as Agents, assisted by P. Wytinck, lawyer)

Re:

Application, first, for the annulment of a letter of the Commission of 27 May 2011, second, for an order for the Commission to pay damages and, third, for an order for the Commission to publish a communiqué.

Operative part of the order

The General Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 355/37

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Western Digital and Western Digital Ireland v Commission

(Case T-452/11) (1)

2012/C 355/79

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 305, 15.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/12

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2012 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-205/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Out of time - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 55/21

Language of the case: Germany

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and J. Möller, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 186, 25.6.2011.