ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/23

Order of the General Court of 10 September 2013 — Symbio Gruppe v OHIM — Ada Cosmetic (SYMBIOTIC CARE)

(Case T-562/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Cancellation of international registration - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 336/48

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Symbio Gruppe GmbH & Co. KG (Herborn, Germany) (represented by: A. Schulz and C. Onken, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke and D. Botis, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Ada Cosmetic GmbH (Kehl, Germany) (represented: initially by H. Börjes-Pestalozza, then by R. Douglas Morton and E. Kessler, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 August 2011 (Case R 2121/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Symbio Gruppe GmbH & Co. KG and Ada Cosmetic GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 13, 14.1.2012
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 292/58

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2014 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-359/11) (1)

2014/C 292/72

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/36

Order of the General Court of 10 March 2014 — Hemofarm v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (HEMOFARM)

(Case T-411/11) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 135/45

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Hemofarm AD farmaceutsko-hemijska industrija Vršac (Vršac, Serbia) (represented by: D. Cañadas Arcas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Laboratorios Diafarm, SA (Barberà del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 May 2011 (Case R 298/2010-4), concerning an opposition procedure between Laboratorios Diafarm, SA and Hemofarm AD farmaceutsko-hemijska industrija Vršac.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. All the parties are ordered to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Biogas Nord Anlagenbau v Commission

(Case T-629/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/70)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Biogas Nord Anlagenbau GmbH (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: C. Birkenmeyer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Biogas Nord Anlagenbau GmbH;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/11

Order of the General Court of 20 May 2015 — Vinci Energies Schweiz AG v OHIM — Accentro Real Estate (ESTAVIS 1993)

(Case T-327/11) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 228/12)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Vinci Energies Schweiz AG (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by G. Schneider and subsequently by G. Schneider and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Accentro Real Estate AG, previously Estavis AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented initially by T. Weiland and subsequently by T. Weiland and S. Müller, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 March 2011 (case R 231/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Vinci Energies Schweiz AG and Estavis AG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.

2. The applicant shall pay its own costs and those incurred by the defendant.

3. The intervener shall pay its own costs.

(1) OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 9/37

Order of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Saobraćajni institut CIP v Commission

(Case T-227/12) (1)

(Action for annulment and damages - Public service contracts - Exclusion of the applicant from the tendering procedure - Annulment of the tendering procedure after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 9/67

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Saobraćajni institut CIP d.o.o. (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: A. Lojpur, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and E. Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for, first, annulment of a contract notice published on 3 April 2012 concerning the preparation of technical documentation for a rail modernisation project, excluding the applicant from participating in the tender procedure, and, second, damages.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the applicant in these proceedings.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 355/38

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Tioxide Europe and Others v Council

(Case T-116/12) (1)

2012/C 355/82

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/26

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 — Lilleborg v OHIM — Hardford Sweden (Pierre Robert)

(Case T-85/12) (1)

2013/C 32/46

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/69

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2012 — Axa Belgium v Commission

(Case T-230/12) (1)

2013/C 26/140

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 164/25

Order of the General Court of 17 April 2013 — Grupo Bimbo v OHIM (SANISSIMO)

(Case T-485/12) (1)

2013/C 164/43

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 141/18

Order of the General Court of 20 February 2013 — Kappa Filter Systems v OHIM

(Case T-422/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Period allowed for bringing proceedings - Out of time - No unforeseeable circumstances - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 141/31

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Kappa Filter Systems GmbH (Steyr-Gleink, Austria) (represented by: C. Hadeyer, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 July 2012 (Case R 817/2012-4), relating to registration of the word mark THE FUTURE HAS ZERO EMISSIONS.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The applicant shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/30

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2013 — Nemeco v OHIM — Coca-Cola (NU)

(Case T-549/12) (1)

2013/C 336/65

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/81

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2013 — Cosma Moden v OHMI — s.Oliver Bernd Freier (COSMA)

(Case T-398/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 225/179

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Cosma Moden GmbH & Co. KG (Emsdetten, Germany) (represented by: J. Meyer, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: s.Oliver Bernd Freier GmbH & Co. KG (Rottendorf, Germany) (represented by: S. Körber and B. Bleifeld, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 July 2012 (Case R 2011/2010-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Cosma Moden GmbH & Co. KG and s.Oliver Bernd Freier & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and each shall pay half of the costs of the defendant.

(1) OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 52/52

Order of the General Court of 7 January 2014 — Lifted Research and LRG Europe v OHIM — Fei Liangchen (Lr geans)

(Case T-390/12) (1)

2014/C 52/101

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 355, 17.11.12.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/16

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — Mory and Others v Commission

(Case T-545/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Traditional and express couriers - Decision not to extend the obligation of repayment to the potential purchasers of the beneficiary in composition with creditors - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 15/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mory SA (Pantin, France); Mory Team (Pantin); Superga Invest, formerly Compagnie française superga d’investissement dans le service (CFSIS) (Miraumont, France) (represented by: B. Vatiert and F. Loubières, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 2401 final of 4 April 2012, concerning the takeover of assets of the Sernam group as part of its composition with creditors.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications of the French Republic and Calberson to intervene.

3. Mory SA, Mory Team and Superga Invest shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The French Republic and Calberson, applicants for leave to intervene, shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 194/25

Order of the General Court of 14 April 2014 — Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft v Council

(Case T-263/12) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Res judicata - Obligation to state reasons - Obligation of individual communication - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Right to property - Proportionality - Competence of the Council - Misuse of powers - Error of law - Definition of support given to nuclear proliferation - Error of assessment - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

2014/C 194/32

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: F. Esclatine and S. Perrotet, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Cujo and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. In addition to bearing its own costs, Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran shall pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Commission is ordered to pay its costs.

(1) OJ C 258, 25. 8. 2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/38

Order of the General Court of 10 March 2014 — Spirlea v Commission

(Case T-518/12) (1)

((Action for annulment - Public health - Decision to bring an end to an EU pilot procedure - Closure of the file on a complaint - Failure to bring an action for failure to fulfil obligations - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 135/48

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Darius Nicolai Spirlea (Capezzano Pianore, Italy); and Mihaela Spirlea (Capezzano Pianore) (represented by: V. Foerster and T. Pahl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and G. Wilms, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by S. Centeno Huerta, and subsequently by J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, lawyers)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of the Commission decision to bring an end to EU pilot procedure No 2070/11/SNCO, as referred to in the letter of 27 September 2012, sent to the applicants under reference SANCO/A2/AM/kva (2012) 1245353.

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Darius Nicolai Spirlea and Mihaela Spirlea are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/30

Order of the General Court of 5 December 2014 — Teva Pharma and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe v EMA

(Case T-547/12) (1)

(2015/C 056/42)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 46, 16.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/12

Order of the General Court of 4 July 2014 — Uspaskich v Parliament

(Case T-84/12) (1)

((Action for annulment and compensation - Privileges and immunities - Member of the European Parliament - Decision to waive immunity - Re-examination - Decision not to defend immunity - Inadmissibility - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 329/15

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties

Applicant: Viktor Uspaskich (Kėdainiai, Lithuania) (represented by: A. Raišutis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, M. Windisch and L. Mašalaitė-Chouteau, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and V. Balčiūnaitė, acting as Agents)

Re:

Firstly, an application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 1 December 2011 not to defend the applicant’s parliamentary immunity and to reject his application for re-examination of the decision to waive immunity and, secondly, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part inadmissible.

2. Mr Viktor Uspaskich shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

3. The Republic of Lithuania shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/60

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2017 — T&L Sugars and Sidul Açúcares v Commission

(Case T-335/12) (1)

(2017/C 144/81)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/25

Order of the General Court of 8 May 2015 — United Kingdom v ECB

(Case T-45/12) (1)

(2015/C 228/31)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 298/6

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2013 — Exakt Advanced Technologies v OHIM — Exakt Precision Tools (EXAKT)

(Case T-37/13) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 298/09

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Exakt Advanced Technologies GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany) (represented by: A. von Bismarck, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Exakt Precision Tools Ltd (Aberdeen, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2012 (Case R 1764/2011-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Exakt Advanced Technologies GmbH and Exakt Precision Tools Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to pay its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 189/24

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 April 2013 — AbbVie v EMA

(Case T-44/13 R)

(Application for interim measures - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the EMA containing information submitted by an undertaking as part of its application for authorisation to place a medicinal product on the market - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Prima facie case - Weighing up of interests)

2013/C 189/51

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: AbbVie, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States); and AbbVie Ltd (Maidenhead, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Bogaert and G. Berrisch, lawyers, B. Kelly, G. Castle, Solicitors, D. Anderson QC and D. Scannell, Barrister)

Defendant(s): European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: T. Jablonski, N. Rampal Olmedo and A. Spina, Agents)

Re:

Application, in essence, for suspension of operation of EMA Decision EMA/748792/2012 of 14 January 2013, granting a third party access to certain documents containing information submitted as part of an application for authorisation to place the medicinal product Humira, used to treat Crohn’s Disease, on the market, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the order

1. The operation of EMA Decision EMA/748792/2012 of 14 January 2013 of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), granting a third party access to Clinical Study Reports M02-404, M04-691 and M05-769, submitted as part of an application for authorisation to place the medicinal product Humira, used to treat Crohn’s Disease, on the market, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, is suspended.

2. The EMA is ordered not to disclose the documents referred to in point 1 of the operative part of this order.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/18

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-284/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Action dismissed at first instance as manifestly inadmissible - The application lodged by fax and the original subsequently received not the same - Original application lodged out of time - Action out of time - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2014/C 15/27

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2013 in Case F-17/12 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/13

Order of the General Court of 15 October 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-148/13) (1)

(Action for annulment - Time-limit for instituting proceedings - Starting point - Publication in the Official Journal - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 359/25

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by S. Centeno Huerta, then by M. J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, abogados del Estado)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, J. Baquero Cruz and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of notice of open competition EPSO/AST/125/12, for the drawing up of a reserve list for assistants (AST 3), in the fields ‘Audit’, ‘Finance/Accounting’ and ‘Economics/Statistics’ (OJ 2012 C 394 A, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 93/23

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 January 2014 — Romonta v Commission

(Case T-614/13 R)

(Interim measures - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - System of exchange of greenhouse gas emission allowances - Free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances from 2013 - Application for recognition of hardship - Lack of urgency)

2014/C 93/40

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Romonta GmbH (Amsdorf, Seebebiet Mansfelder Land, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke, M. Vollmer, C. Telschow and A. Schultze, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. White, C. Hermes and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2013/448/EU of 5 September 2013 concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2013 L 240, p. 27), in so far as the allocation of emission allowances to the applicant for hardship is refused.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.