ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 17 July 2020 — Wagenknecht v European Council

(Case T-715/19) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Combating fraud - Meeting of the European Council - Multiannual financial framework - Financial regulation - Alleged conflict of interest of the representative of the Czech Republic at a meeting of the European Council - Alleged lack of action by the European Council - Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure - Interest in bringing proceedings - Locus standi - Definition of the position of the European Council - End of the failure to act - Inadmissibility - Article 15(2) TEU - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 348/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lukáš Wagenknecht (Pardubice, Czech Republic) (represented by: A. Dolejská, lawyer)

Defendant: European Council (represented by: A. Westerhof Löfflerová, A. Jensen and M.J. Bauerschmidt, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the European Council unlawfully failed to act on the applicant’s request to exclude the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Mr Andrej Babiš, from the meeting of the European Council of 20 June 2019 and from future meetings concerning the financial perspective negotiations, due to his alleged conflict of interest with regard to the requirements of Article 325(1) TFEU and Article 61(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013 (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014 and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible and, in any event, manifestly devoid of any foundation in law.

2. Lukáš Wagenknecht shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — PL v Commission

(Case T-728/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a decision to reassign within the Commission in the interests of the service - Partial refusal of access - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis)

(2021/C 28/76)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PL (represented by: J.-N. Louis and J. Van Rossum, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Vernier, I. Melo Sampaio and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decisions of 13 August and 26 September 2019 refusing in part the disclosure of the documents requested by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. PL is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2020 — DV and Others v Commission

(Case T-576/19) (1)

(2021/C 9/50)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2021 — Groupe Canal + v Commission

(Case T-358/19) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Television distribution - Decision making commitments binding - Withdrawal of the contested act - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 252/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Groupe Canal + SA (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) (represented by: P. Wilhelm, P. Gassenbach and O. de Juvigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, C. Urraca Caviedes and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission Decision of 7 March 2019 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40023 — Cross-border access to pay-TV), making legally binding the commitments given by The Walt Disney Company, The Walt Disney Company Limited, Universal Studios International B.V., Universal Studios Limited and Comcast Corporation, CPT Holdings Inc., Colgems Productions Limited, Sony Corporation, Warner Bros. International Television Distribution Inc., Warner Media LLC, Sky UK Limited and Sky Limited.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the French Republic.

3. The European Commission shall pay the costs, including those incurred by Groupe Canal +, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.

4. Groupe Canal +, the Commission and the French Republic shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 January 2021 — Global Steel Wire and Others v Commission

(Case T-545/19) (1)

(2021/C 88/61)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 319, 23.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 October 2021 — Northgate and Northgate Europe v Commission

(Case T-719/19) (1)

(2021/C 502/64)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 September 2021 — Stagecoach Group v Commission

(Case T-754/19) (1)

(2021/C 452/62)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 24 November 2022 — Ultra Electronics Holdings and Others v Commission

(Case T-763/19) (1)

(2023/C 24/112)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Order of the General Court of 4 January 2022 — CR and CT v ECB

(Case T-730/19) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Applicant having ceased to reply to the Court’s requests - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 119/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: CR, CT (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Koupepidou, A. Lefterov and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the ECB’s assessment of 15 August 2019 in which it found that PNB Banka AS was failing or likely to fail within the meaning of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the Republic of Latvia.

3. CR and CT shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB), with the exception of those relating to the application for leave to intervene.

4. CR and CT, the ECB and the Republic of Latvia shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.
Order of the President of the General Court of 8 June 2020 — Industrias Afrasa v Commission

(Case T-77/20 RII)

(Application for interim measures - Plant protection products - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 - Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency - Serious and irreparable harm - None)

(2020/C 255/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Industrias Afrasa, SA (Paterna, Spain) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, P. Sellar, lawyers, and G. McElwee, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, F. Castilla Contreras and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 of 10 January 2020 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2020 L 7, p. 11).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 October 2020 — KN v EESC

(Case T-377/20 R II)

(Application for interim measures - Civil Service - Member of the EESC - Harassment - OLAF investigation - EESC Bureau decision - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - New application - New facts - Lack of urgency)

(2021/C 9/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KN (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and M. Aboudi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, I. Pouli and A. Carvajal García-Valdecasas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of the decision of the EESC of 9 June 2020 by which the applicant was, inter alia, discharged from all supervisory and personnel management activities.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 August 2020 — Tempora v Parliament

(Case T-450/20) (1)

(2020/C 371/37)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Order of the General Court of 17 December 2020 — Wagenknecht v Commission

(Case T-350/20) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Combating fraud - Meetings of the College of European Commissioners and its President with the representative of the Czech Republic - Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 - Financial regulation - Direct payments from the EU budget in favour of farmers - Alleged conflict of interest of the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic - Alleged failure to act by the Commission - Article 130(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Interest in bringing proceedings - Locus standi - Definition of the Commission’s position - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 62/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lukáš Wagenknecht (Pardubice, Czech Republic) (represented by: A. Koller, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and M. Salyková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 265 TFEU for a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to act on the applicant’s request to adopt, by virtue of Article 325(1) and Article 319(3) TFEU and of Article 61(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1), binding and dissuasive measures designed to prevent or deal with the alleged conflict of interests of Mr Andrej Babiš, the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, in particular, first, by preventing the Members of the College of Commissioners, particularly its President, from meeting Mr Babiš and discussing with him questions connected with the Multiannual Financial Framework of the European Union for 2021-2027 and with the EU budget in general and, second, by adopting measures intended to put an end to the direct payments of agricultural aid from the EU budget in favour of certain companies over which Mr Babiš exercises control and of which he is the effective proprietor.

Operative part of the order

1. No regard shall be had to the document produced as Annex A.9 and passages from the application referring to the content of that document.

2. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

3. Mr Lukáš Wagenknecht shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — LE v Commission

(Case T-475/20 R)

(Application for interim measures - Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Recovery of sums paid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2021/C 28/82)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LE (represented by: M. Straus, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Article 299 TFEU for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2020) 3988 final of 9 June 2020 establishing an enforceable financial obligation against the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
Order of the General Court of 11 February 2021 — Fryč v Commission

(Case T-92/20) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - State aid - Block exemption regulations - Aid programme granted by the Czech authorities in favour of certain undertakings - Commission decision approving that programme - Action for annulment dismissed as being out of time - Damage allegedly caused by acts of the Commission and the EU Courts - Limitation period - Action in part manifestly inadmissible - Causal link - Action in part manifestly unfounded in law)

(2021/C 138/43)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Petr Fryč (Pardubice, Czech Republic) (represented by: Š. Oharková, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braga da Cruz, C. Georgieva-Kecsmar and K. Walkerová, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of, first, the adoption of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation) (OJ 2008 L 214, p. 3), second, the adoption by the Commission of the decision of 3 December 2007 and the failure to publish that decision, third, the shortcomings in the Commission’s handling of the complaints lodged by the applicant between 2016 and 2018 and, fourth, the orders of 5 September 2019, Fryč v Commission (C 230/19 P, not published, EU:C:2019:685), and 15 January 2019, Fryč v Commission (T-513/18, not published, EU:T:2019:22).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the Czech Republic.

3. Mr Petr Fryč shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of those relating to the application for leave to intervene.

4. Mr Petr Fryč and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 January 2021 — Aldi Stores v EUIPO — Dualit (Shape of a toaster)

(Case T-199/20) (1)

(2021/C 79/49)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 April 2021 — Target Brands v EUIPO — The a.r.t. company b&s (ART CLASS)

(Case T-202/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision - Disappearance of the subject matter of the proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 242/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Target Brands Inc. (Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: A. Norris, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: The a.r.t. company b&s, SA (Quel, Spain) (represented by: J. Villamor Muguerza, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 January 2020 (Case R 1597/2019-5) relating to opposition proceedings between The a.r.t. company b&s and Target Brands.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Target Brands Inc.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 March 2021 — Techniplan v Commission

(Case T-426/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - EDF - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 182/73)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Techniplan Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: R. Giuffrida and A. Bonavita, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking, seemingly, the annulment of the Commission’s email of 28 May 2020 and accompanying debit note and, second, application seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Techniplan Srl shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 May 2021 — LG and Others v Commission

(Case T-482/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - OLAF investigation - Legal professional privilege - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 278/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: LG and the five other applicants whose names are listed in the annex (represented by: A. Sigal and M. Teder, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Adamopoulos and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision that the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) allegedly adopted tacitly in an email of 26 May 2020, by which OLAF allegedly rejected the claim for protection of the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and their clients regarding communications between the applicants and their lawyers.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. LG and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 348, 19.10.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Ovsyannikov v Council

(Case T-714/20 R)

(Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - Application for the suspension of operation of measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 252/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Dmitry Vladimirovich Ovsyannikov (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: J. Iriarte Ángel and E. Delage González, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: H. Marcos Fraile and P. Mahnič, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of operation of Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 78, p. 16), of Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 78, p. 6), of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2163 of 20 November 2017 amending Decision 2014/145 (OJ 2017 L 304, p. 51), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2153 of 20 November 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (OJ 2017 L 304, p. 3), of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/399 of 13 March 2020 amending Decision 2014/145 (OJ 2020 L 78, p. 44), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/398 of 13 March 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (OJ 2020 L 78, p. 1), of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1269 of 10 September 2020 amending Decision 2014/145 (OJ 2020 L 298, p. 23), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1267 of 10 September 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (OJ 2020 L 298, p. 1), of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1368 of 1 October 2020 amending Decision 2014/145 (OJ 2020 L 318, p. 5), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1367 of 1 October 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (OJ 2020 L 318, p. 1), in so far as those measures concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2021 — Roxtec v EUIPO — Wallmax (Representation of an orange square containing seven concentric black circles)

(Case T-455/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark depicting an orange square containing seven concentric black circles - Absolute ground for refusal - Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result - Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 382/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Roxtec AB (Karlskrona, Sweden) (represented by: J. Olsson and J. Adamsson, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Wallmax Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: A. Bergmann, F. Ferrari and L. Goglia, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2020 (Case R 2385/2018-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Wallmax and Roxtec.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Roxtec AB shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. Wallmax Srl shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 304, 14.9.2020.