ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-530/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - EAGF and EAFRD - Commission Implementing Decision - Notification to the addressee - Publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union - Time limit for bringing an action - Point from which time starts to run - Delay - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 213/39)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented by: C.-R Canțăr, E. Gane, C.-M. Florescu and O.-C Ichim, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J Aquilina and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/873 of 13 June 2018 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2018 L 152, p. 29) in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by Romania.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Romania shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2019 — Eagle IP v EUIPO — Consolidated Artists (LILLY e VIOLETTA)

(Case T-336/18) (1)

(2019/C 164/64)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Getsmarter Online v EUIPO (getsmarter)

(Case T-473/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark getsmarter - Mark consisting of an advertising slogan - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 230/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Getsmarter Online Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Silcock, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Schneider, A. Folliard-Monguiral and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2018 (Case R 2632/2017-1), relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign getsmarter as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Getsmarter Online Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — Bronckers v Commission

(Case T-746/18) (1)

(2019/C 213/85)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 July 2019 — AMVAC Netherlands v EFSA

(Case T-720/18) (1)

(2019/C 357/53)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 June 2019 — Dickmanns v EUIPO

(Case T-538/18) (1)

(Civil service - Temporary staff - Fixed-term contract with a termination clause - Clause terminating the contract in the event that the name of the agent is not included on the reserve list of a competition - Purely confirmatory measure - Period within which an action must be brought - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 255/55)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sigrid Dickmanns (Gran Alacant, Spain) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 14 December 2017, and ‘if need be’ the decisions of 28 November 2013 and 4 June 2014 of EUIPO terminating the applicant’s employment contract as of 30 June 2018, and, second, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Ms Sigrid Dickmanns shall bear her own costs and pay the costs incurred by EUIPO.

(1) OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.
Order of the General Court of 25 September 2019 — Triantafyllopoulos and Others v ECB

(Case T-451/18) (1)

(Action for damages - Harm allegedly caused to the applicants due to the absence of supervision of the Achaiki Cooperative Bank by the National Bank of Greece and the ECB - Limitation period - Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Causal link - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)

(2019/C 423/66)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Panagiotis Triantafyllopoulos (Patras, Greece) and the 487 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: N. Ioannou, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernandez Saseta and M. Anastasiou, Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking reparation for harm which was allegedly caused to the applicants due to the inadequate supervision by the ECB of Trapeza tis Ellados (National Bank of Greece) which, for its part, inadequately supervised Αchaiki Syneteristiki Τrapeza Syn. PE (the Achaiki Cooperative Bank, Greece), in which the applicants hold shares.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Mr Panagiotis Triantafyllopoulos and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.
Order of the General Court of 17 June 2019 — BS v Parliament

(Case T-593/18) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Notice of modification of pension entitlements - Dependent child allowance - Education allowance - Child suffering from an infirmity preventing him from earning a livelihood - Actual maintenance of the child - Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Recovery of overpayments - Right to good administration - Action for annulment)

(2019/C 399/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: BS (represented by: M. Maes and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: D. Boytha and T. Lazian, and subsequently by T. Lazian and C. González Argüelles, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment, first, of the notice of modification of the Applicant’s pension entitlements of 10 August 2017 issued by the Parliament and, secondly, ‘so far as necessary’ of the decision to recover the purported overpayment of EUR 1 589,16 in respect of the months of September, October and November 2017 and of EUR 4 815,16, as shown on the pension slip for December 2017.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. BS shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 April 2020 — Twitter v EUIPO — 123billets and Hachette Filipacchi Presse (PERISCOPE)

(Case T-682/18) (1)

(2020/C 201/71)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 December 2019 — AG v Europol

(Case T-756/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Decision (EU) 2015/1889 on the dissolution of the Europol pension fund - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 61/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: AG (represented by: C. Abrar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (represented by: J. Teal and A. Ketels, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of Europol’s implied decision refusing the applicant’s complaint of 2 July 2018 against Europol’s implied refusal to adopt a reasoned decision concerning his entitlements in the provisional independent pension fund created by Article 37 of Annex 6 to the Europol Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union.

3. AC and the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) shall each bear their own costs.

4. The Council shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Papaconstantinou and Others v Council and Others

(Case T-188/18) (1)

(2021/C 252/57)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 October 2020 — ZZ v ECB

(Case T-741/18) (1)

(2021/C 19/79)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber (extended composition) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2022 — Cortina and FLA Europe v Commission

(Case T-127/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/51)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 August 2022 — Silgan Closures and Silgan Holdings v Commission

(Case T-415/18) (1)

(2022/C 389/27)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Fastweb v Commission

(Case T-19/19) (1)

(2019/C 399/125)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.
Order of the President of the General Court of 15 July 2019 — 3V Sigma v ECHA

(Case T-176/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - REACH - UVASORB HEB - Evaluation procedure - Decision of the Board of Appeal of ECHA - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2019/C 328/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: 3V Sigma SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented, initially, by C. Bryant and S. Hainsworth, Solicitors, and C. Krampitz, lawyer, and, subsequently, by C. Bryant, S. Hainsworth and D. Anderson, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented, initially, by M. Heikkilä and W. Broere and, subsequently, by W. Broere, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the application of Decision A-004-2017 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 15 January 2019 regarding the substance evaluation of the chemical substance UVASORB HEB and, consequently, the extension, for the duration of the suspension, of the prescribed period for submission of the results of the tests, or an order for any other or additional measure which the President of the Court may consider necessary or appropriate.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the President of the General Court of 23 October 2019 — Walker and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-383/19 R)

(Interlocutory proceedings - Area of freedom, security and justice - Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 - Loss of EU citizenship - Application for interim measures - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 432/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Hilary Elizabeth Walker (Cadix, Spain), Jennifer Ann Cording (Valdagno, Italy), Douglas Edward Watson (Beaumont-du-Périgord, France), Christopher David Randolph (Ballinlassa Belcarra Castlebar, Ireland), Michael Charles Strawson (Serralongue, France) (represented by: J. Fouchet, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: D. Warin and R. van de Westelaken, acting as Agents), and Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Cholakova, R. Meyer and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking, first, suspension of the operation of Regulation (EU) 2019/592 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 April 2019 amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, as regards the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union (JO 2019 L 103 I, p.1), and second, the adoption of certain interim measures.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

(Case T-56/19) (1)

(Action for compensation - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Lack of competence)

(2019/C 399/78)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) (Damascus, Syria) (represented by E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by A. Jaume and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the adoption of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16) and its subsequent implementing acts, and as a result of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 of 17 May 2019 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2019 L 132, p. 36), in so far as those decisions concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Ceramica Flaminia v EUIPO — Ceramica Cielo (goclean)

(Case T-192/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark goclean - Revocation of the contested decision - Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 61/54)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Ceramica Flaminia (Civita Castellana, Italy) (represented by: A. Improda and R. Arista, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ceramica Cielo SpA (Fabrica di Roma, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 January 2019 (Case R 991/2018-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Ceramica Cielo and Ceramica Flaminia.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Micreos Food Safety v Commission

(Case T-568/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - Bacteriophage - Listeria - ListexTM P100 - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 19/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Micreos Food Safety BV (Wageningen, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers, W. Farrell and I. Galindo Martín, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the alleged decision by the European Commission of 17 June 2019 by which it allegedly prohibited the placing on the market of ListexTM P100 for use as a processing aid on animal derived Ready-To-Eat-Food.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 February 2020 — Apple v EUIPO (Stylets)

(Case T-212/19) (1)

(Community design - Division of the application for registration remedying the irregularity which had led to the refusal of registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 114/07)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States) (represented by: H. Hartwig and A. von Mühlendahl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 January 2019 (Case R 2533/2017-3), relating to an application for registration of a Community design representing a stylus.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action;

2. Apple Inc. shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2020 — Hemp Foods Australia v EUIPO — Cabrejos (Sativa)

(Case T-128/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - No recording of the change in ownership in the international register - No locus standi - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 77/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hemp Foods Australia Pty Ltd (Sydney, Australia) (represented by: M. Holah and P. Brownlow, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: César Raúl Dávila Cabrejos (Lima, Peru) (represented by: L. Estropá Navarro, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2018 (Case R 1041/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Cabrejos and Raw With Life Pty Ltd as Trustee for Benhaim Trading Trust.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Hemp Foods Australia Pty Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — AP v EIF

(Case T-155/19) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - EIF Staff - Tendering by the member of staff of her resignation for personal reasons - Leave due to serious illness starting before the end date of the employment contract chosen by the member of staff - Application for withdrawal of the resignation after the end date of the employment contract chosen by the member of staff - EIF’s refusal to accept the retroactive withdrawal of the resignation - End date of the contract delayed on account of sick leave - Whether Article 33 of the EIF Staff Regulations is applicable - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 191/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: AP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Fund (represented by: M. Leander, N. Panayotopoulos and F. Dascalescu, acting as Agents, and by P-E. Partsch and T. Evans, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the EIF’s letters of 30 August and 3 October 2018 rejecting the applicant’s request of 20 June 2018, secondly, that the EIF be ordered to pay the applicant the benefits under Article 33 of the EIF Staff Regulations and, thirdly, compensation for the non-material harm that the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. AP shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Jalkh v Parliament

(Case T-183/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Amendments to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure - Major interpellations - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Locus standi - Lack of direct concern - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act - Implementing measures - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 175/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-François Jalkh (Gretz-Armainvilliers, France) (represented by F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by S. Alonso de León and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought under Article 263 TFUE seeking annulment of Parliament Decision P8_TA(2019)0046 of 31 January 2019 on amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure affecting Chapters 1 and 4 of Title I; Chapter 3 of Title V; Chapters 4 and 5 of Title VII; Chapter 1 of Title VIII; Title XII; Title XIV and Annex II (2018/2170(REG)).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Jean-François Jalkh shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Elevolution — Engenharia v Commission

(Case T-652/19 R)

(Interim measures - Public works contracts - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

(2020/C 255/23)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Elevolution — Engenharia, S.A. (Amadora, Portugal) (represented by: M. Marques Mendes, R. Campos, A. Dias Henriques, M. Troncoso Ferrer and C. García Fernández, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of the Commission’s decision of 12 July 2019 excluding the applicant for a period of three years from procurement and grant award procedures financed by the European Development Fund (EDF) in the context of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/323 of 2 March 2015 on the financial regulation applicable to the 11th European Development Fund (OJ 2015 L 58, p. 17) and ordering the publication of the notification of exclusion on the Commission’s website.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the application for interim measures.