ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 147/18

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 March 2013 — Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction v Council

(Case T-110/12 R)

(Interim relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for interim measures - No urgency - Weighing up of the interests involved)

2013/C 147/33

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction Co. (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: J. Viñals Camallonga, L. Barriola Urruticoechea and J. Iriarte Ángel, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: P. Plaza García and V. Piessevaux, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of (i) Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71) in so far as the applicant’s name was listed in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39) and (ii) in so far as they concern the applicant, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11) and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/13

Order of the General Court of 7 January 2013 — Alfastar Benelux v Council

(Case T-274/12) (1)

(Actions for failure to act - Action devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate - Actions for damages - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 55/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Alfastar Benelux SA (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented by: N. Keramidas and N. Korogiannakis, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Vitsentzatos and E. Chatziioakeimidou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a declaration that the Council has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 266 TFEU in failing to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 20 October 2011 in Case T-57/09 Alfastar Benelux v Council, not published in the ECR, and, in addition, a claim for damages under Article 340 TFEU

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for a declaration of failure to act, brought by Alfastar Benelux SA.

2. The claim for damages brought by Alfastar Benelux is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

3. Alfastar Benelux shall bear 50 % of its own costs and pay 50 % of the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union. The Council shall bear 50 % of its own costs and pay 50 % of the costs incurred by Alfastar Benelux.

(1) OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 233/10

Order of the General Court of 2 July 2013 — Mederer v OHIM — Katjes Fassin (SOCCER GUMS)

(Case T-258/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 233/17

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mederer GmbH (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: O. Ruhl and C. Sachs, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and R. Pethke, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz and C. Osterrieth, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 April 2012 (Case R 225/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mederer GmbH and Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 217, 21.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 189/24

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2013 — FH v Commission

(Case T-405/12) (1)

(Action for annulment and damages - Decision of the Commission to withdraw from the applicant the documents giving him access to the Commission buildings - Action for annulment - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Causal link - Harm - Action manifestly unfounded in law)

2013/C 189/50

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: FH (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot and R. Murru, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Firstly, annulment of the Commission decision of 10 July 2012 withdrawing from the applicant the documents giving him access to the Commission buildings and, secondly, an action seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following the adoption of the contested decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. FH shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/44

Order of the General Court of 13 December 2013 — Automobile Association v OHIM — Duncan Petersen Publishing (Classeurs)

(Case T-508/12) (1)

2014/C 45/78

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 344/55

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Microsoft v OHIM — Sky IP International (SKYDRIVE)

(Case T-153/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 344/99

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Microsoft Corp. (Redmond, Washington, United States) (represented by: A. Carboni and J. Colbourn, Solicitors)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Panayotis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Sky IP International Ltd (Isleworth, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. Baxter and D. Rose, Solicitors, and P. Roberts, Barrister)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 January 2012 (case R 2293/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Sky IP International Ltd and Microsoft Corp.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 142/54

Order of the General Court of 14 February 2014 — Alfa-Beta Vassilopoulos v OHIM — Henkel (AB terra Leaf)

(Case T-522/12) (1)

2014/C 142/69

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/11

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2014 — Faktor, B. i W. Gęsina v Commission

(Case T-468/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Lateness - No force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances - Manifest inadmissibility)

2014/C 78/23

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Firma Handlowa Faktor B. i W. Gęsina, Gęsina Wojciech (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: H. Mackiewicz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Keppenne and M. Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 554/2012 of 19 June 2012 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2012 L 166, p. 20).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Firma Handlowa Faktor B. i W. Gęsina, Gęsina Wojciech is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 380/12

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon v Commission

(Case T-261/12) (1)

((Actions for damages - Public service contract - Tender procedure - Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Commission for protection of competition in Serbia - Rejection of a tender - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

2014/C 380/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE (Chalandri, Greece) (represented by: A. Krystallidis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and P. van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for damages seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the decision of the Delegation of the European Union in the Republic of Serbia to annul the decision to award the contract to the applicant in tender procedure EuropeAid/131427/C/SER/RS, concerning the strengthening of the institutional capacity of the Commission for protection of competition in Serbia (OJ 2011/S 147-243259).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 292/58

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2014 — HUK-Coburg v Commission

(Case T-185/12) (1)

2014/C 292/73

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 232/22

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2016 — Athens Resort Casino v Commission

(Case T-36/12) (1)

((State aid - Annulment of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 232/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Athens Resort Casino AE Symmetochon (Maroussi, Greece) (represented by: N. Niejahr, lawyer, F. Carlin, Barrister, Q. Azau, F. Spyropoulos, I. Dryllerakis, K. Spyropoulos, A. Komninos, K. Struckmann, lawyers, and M. Powell, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, H. van Vliet and P. J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE (Loutraki, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011 on State aid C 16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by Greece in favour of certain Greek casinos (OJ 2011 L 285, p. 25).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Athens Resort Casino AE Symmetochon

3. Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 80, 17.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 96/24

Order of the General Court of 6 February 2015 — Fuhr v Commission

(Case T-248/12) (1)

(2015/C 096/30)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/42

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 July 2013 — Borghezio v Parliament

(Case T-336/13 R)

(Interim relief - European Parliament - Measure excluding a Member of Parliament from his political group - Application to suspend enforcement - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility of the application - Lack of urgency)

2013/C 260/75

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mario Borghezio (Turin, Italy) (represented by: H. Laquay, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N. Görlitz and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the enforcement of the measure of the European Parliament taken in the form of a declaration of its President at the plenary session of 10 June 2013, according to which, as from 3 June 2013, the applicant is to be regarded as a non-attached member and is thus excluded from the political group ‘Europe of Freedom and Democracy’ as from that date.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/34

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 January 2014 — Stichting Sona and Nao v Commission

(Case T-505/13 R)

(Interim measures - Arrangements for the association of overseas countries and territories - 10th European Development Fund - Implementing rules - Netherlands Antilles - Application for suspension of implementation - Application for interim measures - Whether admissible)

2014/C 45/59

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Stichting Sona (Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles) and Nao NV (Curaçao) (represented by: R. Martens, K. Beirnaert and A. Van Vaerenbergh, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. van Beek, G. Wils and S. Pardo Quintillán, Agents)

Re:

Application (i) for suspension of the implementation of the Commission’s decision to designate International Management Group as the body to which powers are delegated in the context of the indirect centralised management of resources required to implement the single programming document for the Netherlands Antilles under the 10th European Development Fund and (ii) requesting the General Court provisionally to order the Commission to enter into negotiations with the applicants in good faith with a view to concluding a delegation agreement entrusting Stichting Sona with the tasks for the implementation of the 10th European Development Fund concerning the Netherlands Antilles, pending publication of the final report of the European Anti-Fraud Office following the investigation of the drainage project on the island of Bonaire.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/14

Order of the General Court of 15 October 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-149/13) (1)

(Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Publication in the Official Journal - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 359/26

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by S. Centeno Huerta, and subsequently by J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, abogados del Estado)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, J. Baquero Cruz and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Notice of Open Competition No EPSO/AST/126/12, to constitute a reserve list of assistants (AST 3), ‘Research’ sector, in the fields of ‘Biology, Life and Health Sciences’, ‘Chemistry’, ‘Physics and Materials Science’, ‘Nuclear Research’, ‘Civil and Mechanical Engineering’ and ‘Electrical Engineering and Electronics’ (OJ 2012, C 394 A, p.11)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/61

Order of the General Court of 24 February 2014 — Bimbo v OHIM (FIBRA PROTEÍNAS NUTRIENTES)

(Case T-600/13) (1)

2014/C 135/81

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 52/37

Order of the General Court of 19 December 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-385/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Action dismissed at first instance as manifestly inadmissible - Application lodged by fax and original subsequently received not the same - Original application lodged out of time - Action out of time - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2014/C 52/70

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 14 May 2013 in Case F-17/12 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 284, 28.9.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/38

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — Energa Power Trading v Commission

(Case T-338/13) (1)

2014/C 184/62

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 252, 31. 8. 2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 159/27

Order of the General Court of 26 March 2014 — Adorisio and Others v Commission

(Case T-321/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Aid granted to banks during the crisis - Recapitalisation of SNS Reaal and SNS Bank - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Expropriation of holders of subordinated bonds - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - No standing to bring proceedings - Manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 159/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Stefania Adorisio (Rome, Italy) and the 363 other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex to the order (represented by: F. Sciaudone, L. Dezzani, R. Sciaudone, S. Frazzani and D. Contini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 1053 final of 22 February 2013 relating to State aid SA.35382 (2013/N) — Kingdom of the Netherlands — Rescue SNS Reaal 2013

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Ms Stefania Adorisio and the 363 other applicants listed in the Annex hereto shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 233, 10.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/53

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Wepa Lille v Commission

(Case T-231/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/89

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Wepa Lille (Bousbecque, France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Wepa Lille is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 253/30

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Gruppo Norton v OHIM — Marín Nicolás (Gruppo Norton S.r.l.)

(Case T-427/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition Proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Gruppo Norton S.r.l. - Earlier national figurative mark NORTON HISPAŃO - Rule 49(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

2014/C 253/43

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Gruppo Norton Srl (Carini, Italy) (represented by: M. García Lirola, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Victoriano Marín Nicolás (Alcantarilla, Spain) (represented by: M. Ruiz Vázquez, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 31 May 2013 (Case R 341/2013-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Mr Victoriano Marín Nicolás and Gruppo Norton Srl.

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed.

2) Gruppo Norton Srl is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/25

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2014 — Elmaghraby and El Gazaerly v Council

(Case T-319/13) (1)

2014/C 329/40

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 245, 24.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/59

Order of the General Court of 26 May 2014 — AK v Commission

(Case T-288/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Reports procedure - Career development report - Appraisal for the years 2001/2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2008 - Delay in drawing up career development reports - Non-material damage - Loss of opportunity for promotion - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

2014/C 315/99

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: AK (Esbo, Finland) (represented by: originally by D. de Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, then by D. de Abreu and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C.Berardis-Kayser, Agents and B. Wägenbauer, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 13 March 2013 in Case F-91/10 AK v Commission [2013] ECR II-0000 seeking the annulment of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. AK is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 233, 10.8.2013.
1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the second head of claim of Ronja s.r.o. in so far as it concerns the annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 8 November 2012 refusing to grant full access to the letters from the Republic of Austria of 19 February and 8 May 2009 sent to the Commission and exchanged between them in relation to complaint No 2008/4340 made by Ronja relating to the transposition of Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products (OJ 2001 L 194, p. 26).