ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/14

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2011 — Mioni v Commission

(Case T-274/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Contractual agents - Expatriation allowance - Conditions imposed by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Notion of habitual residence - Distortion of the facts - Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)

2012/C 39/28

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant(s): Gaëtan Barthélémy Maxence Mioni (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by L. Vogel, lawyer)

Other party/parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by D. Martin and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2011 in Case F-28/10 Mioni v Commission [2011] ECR-SC I-A-I-0000 and II-A-1-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Gaëtan Barthélémy Maxence Mioni will bear his own costs and will pay those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal.

(1) OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/20

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2012 — Nycomed v OHIM — Bayer Consumer Care (ALEVIAN DUO)

(Case T-561/11) (1)

2012/C 184/42

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 6, 7.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 109/12

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 February 2012 — Dagher v Council

(Case T-218/11 R)

(Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted having regard to the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Application for interim measures - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 109/28

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Habib Roland Dagher (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) (represented by: J.-Y. Dupeux and F. Dressen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and E. Dumitriu-Segnana, acting as Agents)

Re:

Firstly, application for an order that the Council and the Italian Republic issue a visa to the applicant; secondly, application for suspension of operation of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 85/2011 of 31 January 2011, implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 of 12 April 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2005 L 28, p. 32) and Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2010 L 28, p. 60); and, thirdly, a claim for damages in compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the application for interim measures.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 227/20

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Attey and Others v Council

(Joined Cases T-118/11, T-123/11 and T-124/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted having regard to the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Withdrawal of the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 227/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Philipp Attey (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (Case T-118/11); Thierry Legré (Abidjan) (Case T-123/11); and Stéphane Kipré (Abidjan) (T-124/11) (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Chavrier, Agents)

Parties intervening in support of the defendant: Republic of Côte d’Ivoire (represented by: J.P. Mignard and J.P. Benoit, lawyers); and European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Re:

Applications for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36) and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), in so far as the applicants’ names have been placed on the list of persons and entities to which those restrictive measures apply.

Operative part of the order

1. Cases T-118/11, T-123/11 and T-124/11 are to be joined for the purposes of the order.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the actions.

3. The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by Mr Philipp Attey, Mr Thierry Legré and Mr Stéphane Kipré.

4. The Republic of Côte d’Ivoire and the European Commission are to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 227/21

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Elti v Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro

(Case T-395/11) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Public supply contracts - Tender procedure - Digitalisation of the Montenegrin Public Broadcasting - Decision awarding the contract taken by the Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro - No legal capacity to be a defendant - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 227/35

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Elti d.o.o. (Gornja Radgona, Slovenia) (represented by: N. Zidar Klemenčič, lawyer)

Defendant: Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro (represented by: initially N. Bertolini, acting as Agent, subsequently J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, lawyers)

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment of the decision of the Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro of 21 March 2011 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the public procurement procedure for the supply of equipment for the digitalisation of the Montenegrin Public Broadcasting and, by way of corollary claim, of the decision to award that contract to another undertaking and, in the alternative, for damages

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Elti d.o.o. shall pay the costs, including those of the interim proceedings.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 373/13

Order of the General Court of 19 October 2012 — Meyr-Melnhof Karton v OHIM — Stora Enso (SILVAWHITE)

(Case T-617/11) (1)

2012/C 373/23

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2012 — Rautenbach v Council and Commission

(Case T-222/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted having regard to the situation in Zimbabwe - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

(2012/C 331/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Muller Conrad Rautenbach (Harare, Zimbabwe) (represented by: S. Smith QC, M. Lester, Barrister, and W. Osmond, Solicitor)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and J. Herrmann, acting as Agents) and European Commission (represented by E. Paasivirta, M. Konstantinidis and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)

Re:

ACTION for the annulment of Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP of 15 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe (OJ 2011 L 42, p. 6), and of Commission Regulation (EU) No 174/2011 of 23 February 2011 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe (OJ 2011 L 49, p. 23), in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The Council of the European Union shall bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by Muller Conrad Rautenbach.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 186, 25.6.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/24

Order of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Mische v Commission

(Case T-641/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Appointment - Classification in grade and step - Competition published before the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations of Officials - Recruitment by the Parliament and simultaneous transfer to the Commission - No need to adjudicate in part - Appeal in part clearly unfounded)

2013/C 38/43

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Harald Mische (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Holland, J. Mische and M. Velardo, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, acting as Agent); and Council of the European Union (represented by: A.F. Jensen and J. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case F-70/05 Mische v Commission (2011) ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the appeal to the extent that it is directed against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case F-70/05 Mische v Commission (2011) ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 in so far as that judgment dismisses the claims for annulment of the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 11 November 2004 because that decision determines Mr Harald Mische’s grade to be A*6;

2. The appeal is dismissed as to the remainder;

3. Mr Harald Mische shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings;

4. The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/47

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2012 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Real Seguros (real,- QUALITY)

(Case T-548/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of earlier national trade marks - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 26/93

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Real Seguros, SA (Porto, Portugal)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 August 2011 (Case R 114/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Real Seguros, SA and MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The parties shall bear their own costs incurred before the General Court.

(1) OJ C 6, 7.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/83

Order of the General Court of 27 May 2013 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-45/11) (1)

2013/C 225/186

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 86/16

Order of the President of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Travetanche Injection v Commission

(Case T-368/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Dismissal of the main action - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 86/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Travetanche Injection SPRL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve, Agents, assisted by K. Sawyer, Barrister)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 of 14 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annex XVII (Acrylamide)

Operative part of the order

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/30

Order of the General Court of 19 December 2013 — da Silva Tenreiro v Commission

(Case T-634/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Appointment to post of Director of Directorate E ‘Justice’ in the Commission’s Directorate General ‘Justice, Freedom and Security’ - Rejection of the appellant’s candidature - Appointment of another candidate - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2014/C 45/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Mario Paulo da Silva Tenreiro (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and L. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case F-72/10 da Silva Tenreiro v Commission, seeking annulment of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Mario Paulo da Silva Tenreiro shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/22

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2013 — Telefónica v Commission

(Case T-430/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme permitting tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and not ordering the recovery of the aid - Act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Lack of status as an actual recipient under the aid scheme - No obligation to repay the aid - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 336/45

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant Telefónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by R. Lyal, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Request for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2011/282/EU of 12 January 2011 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions No C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 135, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Telefónica, SA is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 339/17

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2014 — BTL Diffusion v OHIM — dm-drogerie markt (babyTOlove)

(Case T-518/11) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 339/19

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BTL Diffusion (St Cloud, France) (represented by: A. Berendes, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: C. Mellein and B. Beinert, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 July 2011 (Case R 883/2010-2) concerning opposition proceedings between dm-drogerie markt GmbH and BTL Diffusion.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/38

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — Elmaghraby v Council

(Case T-265/11) (1)

2014/C 184/60

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 219, 23. 7. 2011.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Cheverny Investments v Commission

(Case T-585/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Cheverny Investments Ltd (St. Julians, Malta) (represented by: H. Prinz zu Hohenlohe-Langenburg, R. Staab and S. Rasch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R.Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Cheverny Investments Ltd.;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2016 — ETAD v Commission

(Case T-419/11) (1)

((State aid - Annulment of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 222/22)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Etaireia Akiniton Dimosiou AE (ETAD), formerly Ellinika Touristika Akinita AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Frangakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, H. van Vliet and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Elliniko Kazino Kerkyras AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Frangakis, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE (Loutraki, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011 on State aid to certain Greek casinos C 16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by the Hellenic Republic (OJ L 285, p. 25).

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission shall pay its own costs and pay those incurred by Etaireia Akiniton Dimosiou AE (ETAD) and Elliniko Kazino Kerkyras.

3. Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE shall pay their own costs.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 174/24

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 April 2012 — Ternavsky v Council

(Case T-163/12 R)

(Applications for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Belarus - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Disregard of the formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 174/40

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Anatoly Ternavsky (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: C. Rapin and E. Van den Haute, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Re:

Application for suspension of the application of point 2 of Annex II to Council Implementing Decision 2012/171/CFSP of 23 March 2012 implementing Decision 2010/639/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2012 L 87, p. 95) and of point 2 of Annex II to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 265/2012 of 23 March 2012 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2012 L 87, p. 37)

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 366/34

Order of the General Court of 9 October 2012 — Région Poitou-Charentes v Commission

(Case T-31/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Structural Funds - Measure not subject to review - Measure in part informative and in part preparatory - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 366/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Région Poitou-Charentes (France) (represented by: J. Capiaux, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and A. Steiblytė, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 18 November 2011, mentioning as its subject: ‘Closure of the program “Atlantic Area” 2000-2006, Approval of the Final Report, CCI: 2001 RG 16 0PC 006’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Région Poitou-Charentes shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/23

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Gas v OHIM — Grotto (GAS)

(Case T-92/12) (1)

2012/C 273/43

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/27

Order of the General Court of 5 December 2012 — Soltau v Commission

(Case T-333/12) (1)

2013/C 32/50

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 303, 6.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 9/38

Order of the President of the General Court of 14 November 2012 — Intrasoft v Commission

(Case T-403/12 R)

(Interim measures - Public contracts - Procurement procedure - Rejection of a bid - Application for a stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2013/C 9/69

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Intrasoft International SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and E. Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution, first, of the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 10 August 2012 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the tendering procedure EuropeAid/131367/C/SER/RS concerning technical assistance to the customs administration of Serbia to support the modernisation of the customs system (OJ 2011/S 160-262712), and, secondly, of the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 12 September 2012 informing the applicant that the evaluation committee had recommended that the contract be awarded to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.