ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 194/41

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — A v Commission

(Case F-50/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Social security - Accident or occupational disease - Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Permanent partial invalidity - Application for compensation - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 194/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: A (represented by: B. Cambier and A. Paternostre, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Joris, acting as Agent, and C. Mélotte, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision ruling on the application for additional compensation, made by the applicant on the basis of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations, in order to obtain full reparation for the material and non-material losses which he suffered following his occupational disease and the numerous irregularities which occurred in the examination of his application based on Article 73 of the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 63.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 98/63

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 January 2016 — Goch v Council

(Case F-21/13) (1)

(2016/C 098/83)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 156, 1/6/2013, p. 55.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/48

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-89/13) (1)

((Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings - Failure to designate a new representative - Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 146/66)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A., lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to withhold the sum of EUR 504,67 from the applicant’s invalidity allowance for the each of the three months from January to March 2013.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-89/13 Marcuccio v Commission.

2. Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014, p. 39.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 371/34

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 August 2016 — McMichael v Commission

(Case F-18/13) (1)

(2016/C 371/41)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 114, 20/4/2013, p. 47.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 May 2016 — Jimenez Krause v Commission

(Case F-93/13) (1)

(2016/C 222/68)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 336, 16/11/2013, p. 32.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/32

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 22 April 2015 — ED v ENISA

(Case F-105/14) (1)

((Civil service - Temporary staff member - Selection procedure - Decision rejecting an application, during the pre-selection stage, following examination by a selection board - No complaint lodged within the time-limit laid down in the Staff Regulations against the decision rejecting the application - Request for information - Reply from the authority authorised to conclude employment contracts not including a review of the decision rejecting the application - Complaint lodged against that reply - Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2015/C 190/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ED (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (represented by: A. Ryan, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Action for the annulment of the decision not to retain the applicant’s application for the post of ‘Legal Officer’ in response to Vacancy Notice ENISA-TA-AD-2013-05.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. ED shall bear her own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security.

(1) OJ C 7 of 12.1.2015, p. 53.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 351/31

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 July 2014 — DJ v EASA

(Case F-3/14) (1)

2014/C 351/41

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) ОJ C 85, 22.3.2014, p. 27.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 406/45

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 27 October 2015 — Ameryckx v Commission

(Case F-140/14) (1)

((Civil service - Member of the contract staff - Function group - Grading - Plea of inadmissibility - Concept of an act adversely affecting the applicant - Confirmatory decision - New and substantial fact - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 406/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marianella Ameryckx (Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to ‘reconstruct’ the applicant’s career by re-grading her, from 1 March 2005, in a higher function group, and an application for compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm allegedly incurred.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Ameryckx is to bear her own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 65, 23.2.2015, p. 55.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 254/25

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2015 — van Oudenaarden v Parliament

(Case F-139/14) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Annual leave - Carry over limited to 12 days - Compensation - Pension statement - Failure to contest within the time-limit - Lack of new material facts - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly inadmissible))

(2015/C 254/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Annetje Elisabeth van Oudenaarden (Grevenmacher, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and N. Chemaï, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to carry over to 2013 days of leave not taken by the applicant in 2012 due to illness and a claim for damages in respect of material and non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissble.

2. Ms van Oudenaarden and the European Parliament shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 89, 16.3.2015, p. 46.
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 20 July 2016 — Polizzi v Commission

(Case F-138/14) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Proposal to add years of pensionable service - Act not having an adverse effect - Inadmissibility of the action - Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 364/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Rosalba Polizzi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to calculate the applicant’s pension rights in the context of the transfer of those rights to the European Union pension scheme, which decision applies the new general implementing provisions relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Ms Rosalba Polizzi shall bear her own costs and is ordered to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 34, 2.2.2015, p. 55.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 May 2016 — Chatel v Council

(Case F-91/14) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Pension rights acquired, before entering the service of the European Union, under a national pension scheme - Transfer to the EU’s pension scheme - Proposal concerning additional pensionable years, accepted by the applicant, based on new General Implementing Provisions - Concept of measure adversely affecting a person - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 81 of the Rules of procedure))

(2016/C 222/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Zlata Chatel (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, then D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, and, finally, J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and E. Rebasti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision concerning the transfer of the applicants’ pension rights to the European Union pension scheme applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 421 of 24/11/2014, p. 63.
Case F-29/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 9 July 2015 — Vecchio v Joint undertaking ECSEL

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 9 July 2015 — Vecchio v Joint undertaking ECSEL

(Case F-29/15) ( 1 )

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 146, 4.5.2015, p. 50.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 90/27

Order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 January 2016 — Brouillard v Commission

(Case F-148/15 R)

((Civil Service - Non-admission to the tests in a competition - Interim proceedings - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency))

(2016/C 090/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alain Laurent Brouillard (Forest, Belgium) (represented by: P. Vande Casteele, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the selection board in Competition EPSO/AD/306/15 — French-language lawyer-linguists (AD 7) not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition on the ground that he did not have a level of education corresponding to a completed course of legal training from a Belgian, French or Luxemburgish institution of higher education.

Operative part of the order

1. Mr Brouillard’s application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 429/31

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 November 2015 — FM and FO v CEPOL

(Case F-105/15) (1)

(2015/C 429/44)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 320, 28/9/2015, p. 53.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 1 August 2016 — Simon v Commission

(Case F-28/15) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Decision on recognition of additional pensionable years applying the new general implementing provisions for Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 364/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Anne-Claire Simon (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: G. Gattinara, acting as Agent)

Subject matter of the case

Application for annulment of the final decision on the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights to the European Union pension scheme, which applies the new general implementing provisions (GIPs) of 3 March 2011 for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2) The parties shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 146, 4.5.2015, p. 49.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 3 May 2016 — Pals v Commission

(Case F-95/15) (1)

(2016/C 222/79)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 294, 7/9/2015, p. 84.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/58

Order of the General Court of 25 June 2014 — José Manuel Baena Grupo v OHIM — Neuman (Seated figure)

(Case T-28/14) (1)

2014/C 303/70

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.
Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — Bos and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-23/14) (1)

(Action for annulment - Reform of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Substantial reduction in the number of days of annual leave for officials and other servants serving in a third country - Lack of individual concern - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2015/C 016/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Mark Bos (Ankara, Turkey); Estelle Kadouch (Jerusalem, Israel); Siegfried Krahl (Lago Sul, Brazil); and Eric Lunel (Dakar, Senegal) (represented by: F. Krenc, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and E. Taneva, acting as Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment brought under Article 263 TFEU against point 70 of Article 1 of Regulation (EU, EURATOM) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 15), in so far as it amends Annex X to Regulation No 31 (EEC), 11 (EAEC), laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 1962, 45, p. 1385).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mark Bos, Estelle Kadouch, Siegfried Krahl and Eric Lunel shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

3. There is no need to give a ruling on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/15

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Georgsmarienhütte v Commission

(Case T-176/14 R)

((Interim measures - State aid - National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source - Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Fumus boni juris))

2014/C 329/20

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Gerorgsmarienhütte GmbH (Georgsmarienhütte, Germany) (represented by: H. Hofler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The judgment in Case T-176/14 R Gerorgsmarienhütte v Commission is set aside
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/31

Order of the General Court of 3 December 2014 — ENISA v Psarras

(Case T-689/14 P) (1)

(2015/C 056/45)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Appeal Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/46

Order of the General Court of 2 September 2014 — Petropars and Others v Council

(Case T-370/14) (1)

(2014/C 431/73)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 127/28

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 February 2015 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-826/14 R)

((Interim measures - State aid - Regime of taxation on companies enabling undertakings that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident abroad - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for a stay of execution - Prima facie Case - Lack of urgency))

(2015/C 127/38)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. Sampol Pucurull, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision C (2014) 7280 final of 15 October 2014 on State aid SA.35550 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by Spain and concerning the regime for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 8 January 2015 delivered in Case T-826/14 R is cancelled.
Order of the General Court of 7 January 2015 — Freitas v Parliament and Council

(Case T-185/14) (1)

(Action for annulment - Directive 2013/55/EU - Directive 2005/36/EC - Recognition of professional qualifications - Exclusion of notaries appointed by official act of the public authorities from the scope of application of Directive 2005/36 - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2015/C 073/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: José Freitas (Porto, Portugal) (represented by: J.-P. Hordies, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and A. Tamás, Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: P. Mahnič Bruni and M. Moore, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1(2)(b) of Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 354, p. 132).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications of the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the European Commission, the Ordem dos Notários (Portuguese notarial professional body) and of the Conseil national des barreaux (French National Bar Council) to intervene.

3. Mr Freitas shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 184, 16.6.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/31

Order of the General Court of 14 April 2015 — Sabic Polyolefine v Commission

(Case T-279/14) (1)

(2015/C 190/35)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/40

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — TechnoCompound v Commission

(Case T-307/14) (1)

(2015/C 155/55)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 245/23

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Autoneum Germany v Commission

(Case T-295/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate - Action for annulment - Application to amend the form of order sought - No new information - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 245/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Autoneum Germany GmbH (Roßdorf, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, C. Oehme, M. Ringel and T. Wielsch lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The application seeking that the form of order sought in the present action be amended to cover Commission decision C (2014) 8786 final of 25 November 2014 relating to State Aid SA. 33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users is rejected as inadmissible.

3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

4. Autoneum Germany GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

5. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/17

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2015 — Red Bull v OHIM — Automobili Lamborghini (Representation of two bulls)

(Case T-73/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 221/23)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria) (represented by: initially, A. Renck, V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers, and I. Fowler, Solicitor, then by A. Renck and I. Fowler)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Automobili Lamborghini SpA (Sant'Agata Bolognese, Italy) (represented by: M. Hartmann, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 November 2013 (Case R 1263/2012-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between Automobili Lamborghini SpA and Red Bull GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.