ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/41

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Alsharghawi v Council

(Case T-66/15) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya - Action for failure to act - Council’s position - Subject-matter of the action ceasing to exist - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 381/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bashir Saleh Bashir Alsharghawi (Johannesburg (South Africa) (represented by: E. Moutet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Declare, on the basis of Article 265 TFEU, that the Council unlawfully refrained from re-examining its decision to include the applicant’s name on the list of persons and entities covered by the restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 146, 4.5.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 111/25

Order of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Hispasat v Commission

(Case T-36/15) (1)

((State aid - Digital television - Aid for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less-urbanised areas of Castilla-La Mancha - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Correction of that decision after the action had been brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 111/30)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Hispasat, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: initially J. Buendía Sierra, A. Lamadrid de Pablo and A. Balcells Cartagena, and, subsequently, J. Buendía Sierra and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, P. Němečková and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C (2014) 6846 final of 1 October 2014 concerning State aid SA.27408 (C 24/2010) (ex NN 37/2010, ex CP 19/2009) granted by the authorities of Castilla-La Mancha for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas of Castilla-La Mancha.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on SES Astra’s application for leave to intervene.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Hispasat, SA.

(1) OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 59/20

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 December 2015 — Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA

(Case T-669/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - REACH - Making available on the market and use of biocidal products - Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

(2016/C 059/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH (Berlin, Germany); Ecolab Deutschland GmbH (Monheim am Rhein, Germany); Schülke & Mayr GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany); and Diversey Europe Operations BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, M. Grunchard, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Advocate)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: C. Buchanan and W. Broere, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of ECHA of 16 July 2015 to include company B. as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ 2012 L 167, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 191/45

Order of the General Court of 5 April 2016 — Syria Steel and Al Buroj Trading v Council

(Case T-285/15) (1)

(2016/C 191/62)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/46

Order of the General Court of 9 March 2016 — Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest and Others v Commission

(Case T-438/15) (1)

((State aid - Corporation tax - Aid in favour of Belgian ports granted by Belgium - Commission letter informing the Member State of its preliminary assessment of that aid as being incompatible with the internal market and of the likely adoption of appropriate measures - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 156/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest SCRL (La Louvière, Belgium), Port autonome de Namur (Namur, Belgium), Port autonome de Charleroi (Charleroi, Belgium), and Région wallonne (Belgium) (represented by: J. Vanden Eynde, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision, ostensibly contained in the Commission’s letter of 1 June 2015, finding that the corporation tax exemption for Belgian ports constitutes existing State aid that is incompatible with the internal market (State aid SA.38393 (2014/CP)).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest SCRL, the Port autonome de Namur, the Port autonome de Charleroi and the Région wallonne shall bear their own respective costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Port autonome de Liège and the Société régionale du port de Bruxelles shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ 2015 C 337, 12.10.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 April 2016 — Filip Mikulik v Council

(Case T-520/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 222/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Filip Mikulik (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (sitting as a single judge) of 25 June 2015 in Mikulik v Council (F 67/14, EU:F:2015:65), and seeking the annulment of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. dismisses the appeal;

2. orders Mr Filip Mikulik to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/22

Order of the General Court of 4 April 2016 — L'Oréal v EUIPO — LR Health & Beauty Systems (LR)

(Case T-475/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the mark - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 200/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: L’Oréal SA (Paris, France) (represented by: R. Dissman, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Kusturovic, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH (Ahlen, Germany) (represented by: N. Weber and L. Thiel, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 May 2015 (Case R 1143/2014-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH and L’Oréal SA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. L’Oréal SA is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH.

(1) OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 314/24

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 June 2016 — ICA Laboratories and Others v Commission

(Case T-732/15 R II)

((Application for interim measures - Environment - Consumer protection - Regulation fixing maximum residue levels for guazatine - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - New application - No new facts - No urgency))

(2016/C 314/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ICA Laboratories Close Corp. (Century City, South Africa); ICA International Chemicals (Proprietary) Ltd (Century City); ICA Developments (Proprietary) Ltd (Century City) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, R. Crespi and P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, pursuant to Article 160 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, for suspension of the operation of Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1910 of 21 October 2015 amending Annexes III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for guazatine in or on certain products (OJ 2015 L 280, p. 2).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/40

Order of the General Court of 26 May 2016 — SLE Schuh v EUIPO — Vigoss Tekstil Konfeksiyon (VIOS)

(Case T-191/15) (1)

(2016/C 279/56)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/33

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council

(Case T-463/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/49)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/34

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Cham v Council

(Case T-470/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/56)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/37

Order of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Biofa v Commission

(Case T-746/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Plant protection products - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 - Approval of the basic substance sodium hydrogen carbonate - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 006/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Biofa AG (Münsingen, Germany) (represented by: C. Stallberg and S. Knoblich, and subsequently by C. Stallberg, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Ondrůšek, G. von Rintelen and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 of 17 November 2015 approving the basic substance sodium hydrogen carbonate in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2015 L 301, p. 42).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene of the Kingdom of Denmark.

3. Biofa AG shall pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

4. The Kingdom of Denmark shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 419/45

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — Aston Martin Lagonda v EUIPO (Representation of a grille on the front of a car)

(Case T-87/15) (1)

((European Union trade mark - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 419/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd (Gaydon, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 December 2014 (Case R 1797/2014-2) relating to the applicant’s Community trade mark application

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/16

Order of the General Court of 28 March 2017 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (VIEWTY SMART)

(Case T-488/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Wulff and U. Hildebrandt, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 June 2015 (Case R 1734/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH and LG Electronics, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. LG Electronics, Inc., is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/42

Order of the General Court of 25 January 2017 — Amitié v EACEA

(Case T-59/15) (1)

(2017/C 078/59)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Order of the General Court of 28 June 2018 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-478/15) (1)

((Actions for annulment - European Union’s own resources - Financial responsibility of the Member States - Obligation to pay the Commission the amount corresponding to a loss of own resources - Letter from the Commission - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 301/42)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented initially by R.-H. Radu, A. Buzoianu and E. Gane, subsequently by R.-H. Radu, E. Gane, A. Wellman and M. Chicu, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Caeiros and A. Ştefănuc, subsequently by A. Caeiros and G.-D. Balan, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Directorate-General for Budget of the Commission which is contained in the letter with reference Ares (2015) 2453089 of 11 June 2015 by which the latter ordered Romania to provide it with the gross amount of EUR 1 079 513,09, from which 25 % should be deducted for collection costs, corresponding to a loss of traditional own resources, at the latest on the first working day following the nineteenth day of the second month following the dispatch of that letter, at the risk of having to pay default interest pursuant to Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 implementing Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom on the system of the Communities’ own resources (OJ 2000 L 130, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to rule on the Slovak Republic’s application to intervene.

3. Romania is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those by the European Commission.

4. Romania, the Commission and the Slovak Republic shall each bear their own costs relating to the latter’s application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 346, 19.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 392/29

Order of the General Court of 25 September 2017 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-542/15) (1)

((ERDF - Operational Programme ‘Transport’ and Regional Operational Programmes for Central Hungary, West Pannon, South Great Plain, Central Transdanubia, North Hungary, North Great Plain and South Transdanubia - Decision to suspend the interim payments - Repeal of the contested act - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 392/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: J. Bonhage and F. Quast, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and A. Tokár, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 4979 final of 14 July 2015 on the suspension of part of the interim payments from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund for the expenditure paid for the Operational Programme ‘Transport’ for the regions of Central Hungary, West Pannon, South Great Plain, Central Transdanubia, North Hungary, North Great Plain and South Transdanubia

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Hungary is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Haswani v Council

(Case T-231/15 RENV) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds - Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Modification of the application - Admissibility - Need to modify pleas in law and arguments - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any foundation in law)

(2019/C 399/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: George Haswani (Yabroud, Syria) (represented by: G. Karouni, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Sikora-Kaleda and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the form or order sought by the defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Havas, R. Tricot and A. Bouquet, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/383 of 6 March 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015 L 64, p. 41), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/375 of 6 March 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015 L 64, p. 10), of Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015 L 132, p. 82), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/828 of 28 May 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015 L 132, p. 3), of Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 125), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/840 of 27 May 2016 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 30), in so far as those acts concern the applicant, and, second, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicant alleges that he suffered as a result of those acts.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr George Haswani shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union in Cases C-313/17 P and T-231/15 RENV.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs in Cases C-313/17 P and T-231/15 RENV.

(1) OJ C 213, 29.6.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products v Commission

(Case T-737/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products GmbH (Grevenbroich, Germany) (represented by: U. Karpenstein and K. Dingemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products GmbH.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 191/33

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2016 — Cyprus Turkish Chamber of Industry and Others v Commission

(Case T-41/16 R)

((Application for interim measures - Procedure for registration of a protected designation of origin - ‘Halloumi’ or ‘Hellim’ - Rejection of opposition - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2016/C 191/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Cyprus Turkish Chamber of Industry (Nicosia, Cyprus), Animal Breeders Association (Nicosia), Milk and Oil Products Production and Marketing Cooperative Ltd (Nicosia), Süt Ürünleri İmalatçulari Birliği Milk Processors Association (Nicosia), and Fatma Garanti (Güzelyurt, Cyprus) (represented by: B. O’Connor, solicitor, S. Gubel and E. Bertolotto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis, J. Guillem Carrau and P. Aalto, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU and seeking the grant of interim measures relating to the procedure for registration of the cheese referred to as ‘halloumi/hellim’ as a protected designation of origin under Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 14/35

Order of the General Court of 27 October 2016 — Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest and Others v Commission

(Case T-116/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Corporate tax - Aid in favour of Belgian ports granted by Belgium - Commission letter proposing the adoption of appropriate measures - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 014/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest SCRL (La Louvière, Belgium), Port autonome de Namur (Namur, Belgiun), Port autonome de Charleroi (Charleroi, Belgium), Port autonome de Liège (Liège, Belgium), Région wallonne (Belgium) (represented by: J. Vanden Eynde, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU, requesting annulment of the alleged decision concerning State aid SA.38393 (2015/E) — Taxation of ports in Belgium, annexed to the Commission’s letter of 22 January 2016 seeking to propose appropriate measures to the Kingdom of Belgium.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest SCRL, the Port autonome de Namur, the Port autonome de Charleroi, the Port autonome de Liège and the Région wallonne shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.