Order of the Court of 30 June 1959. - Société métallurgique de Knutange v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community. - Joined cases 15-59 and 29-59.



European Court reports

French edition Page 00039

Dutch edition Page 00039

German edition Page 00039

Italian edition Page 00037

English special edition Page 00014



Parties

Subject of the case

Grounds

Operative part



Parties

++++

IN THE ACTION BETWEEN

SOCIETE METALLURGIQUE DE KNUTANGE, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY WHOSE REGISTERED OFFICES ARE AT 16 BOULEVARD MALESHERBES, PARIS, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, JEAN LATOURTE, ASSISTED BY JEAN - PIERRE ARON, ADVOCATE AT THE COUR D'APPEL, PARIS, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF THE CHAMBRE SYNDICALE DE LA SIDERURGIE FRANCAISE AT 49 BOULEVARD JOSEPH-II, APPLICANT

HIGH AUTHORITY OF THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER, PROFESSOR GIULIO PASETTI, ACTING AS AGENT, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT ITS OFFICES, 2 PLACE DE METZ, DEFENDANT,

Subject of the case

CONCERNING THE REQUEST MADE UNDER ARTICLE 69 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT OF 4 MARCH 1953, OR UNDER ARTICLE 91 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF 3 MARCH 1959, BY THE HIGH AUTHORITY, THE DEFENDANT, WITH REGARD TO THE APPLICATION BROUGHT AGAINST IT BY THE KNUTANGE UNDERTAKING AND REQUESTING THAT THE SAID APPLICATION BE DISMISSED AS INADMISSIBLE .

Grounds

P . 15

BY APPLICATION LODGED AT THE REGISTRY ON 27 MARCH 1959, THE APPLICANT UNDERTAKING, WHICH IS A PRODUCER OF STEEL, HAS CLAIMED THAT THE COURT SHOULD 'ANNUL, AS BASED ON PROVISIONS OF GENERAL DECISION N . 2/57 OF 26 FEBRUARY 1957, WHICH ARE VOID, THE DECISION OF THE HIGH AUTHORITY NOTIFIED TO THE APPLICANT BY LETTER OF THE HIGH AUTHORITY DATED 27 FEBRUARY 1959 '.

ON 28 APRIL 1959 THE DEFENDANT LODGED A PLEADING DATED 16 APRIL 1959 . IT ARGUES THAT THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE LETTER OF 27 FEBRUARY 1959 WAS 'TO INFORM THE UNDERTAKING CONCERNED OF THE CONCLUSIONS WHICH HAD BEEN REACHED UPON THE PRELIMINARY INQUIRIES INTO THE CASE, WHILE THE HIGH AUTHORITY AS SUCH HAD NOT YET TAKEN A DECISION ON THE REQUEST FOR EXONERATION MADE BY THE APPLICANT UNDERTAKING '.

THE DEFENDANT, TAKING THE VIEW THAT IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE APPLICATION WAS NOT ADMISSIBLE, CLAIMED THAT THE COURT SHOULD : 'IN APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 69 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT OF 4 MARCH 1953 OR OF ARTICLE 91 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF 3 MARCH 1959, DISMISS THE APPLICATION MADE ON 25 MARCH 1959 AS INADMISSIBLE BECAUSE IT IS NOT DIRECTED AGAINST A DECISION OF THE HIGH AUTHORITY '.

IN ADDITION, ON 22 APRIL 1959 THE HIGH AUTHORITY TOOK A DECISION FORMALLY REJECTING THE REQUEST MADE BY THE KNUTANGE UNDERTAKING .

THAT DECISION WAS NOTIFIED TO THE KNUTANGE UNDERTAKING ON 6 MAY 1959 .

AS AGAINST THE SAID DECISION THE SAID UNDERTAKING MADE A NEW APPLICATION WHICH WAS LODGED AT THE REGISTRY ON 27 MAY 1959 . THAT APPLICATION RAISES SUBMISSIONS WHICH ARE PRACTICALLY IDENTICAL TO THE SUBMISSIONS ALREADY RAISED IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION OF 25 MARCH 1959 .

THE COURT WILL, IN ANY EVENT, BE REQUIRED TO PASS JUDGMENT ON THE LEGALITY OF ONE OR THE OTHER OF THE CONTESTED DECISIONS, WHICH HAVE THE SAME CONTENTS .

THEREFORE IT IS NOT NECESSARY, AT THE PRESENT STAGE IN THE PROCEEDINGS, TO DECIDE WHETHER THE WRITTEN COMMUNICATION OF 27 FEBRUARY 1959 DID OR DID NOT CONTAIN A DECISION OF THE HIGH AUTHORITY .

THEREFORE, FOR THE ABOVEMENTIONED REASONS, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO RESERVE A DECISION ON THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTION RAISED BY THE HIGH AUTHORITY FOR THE FINAL JUDGMENT .

Operative part

THE COURT

HEREBY ORDERS :

1 . A DECISION ON THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTION RAISED BY THE HIGH AUTHORITY IS RESERVED FOR THE FINAL JUDGMENT;

2 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .