ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 104/23

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 January 2017 — Carsten René Beul v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-53/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Action for annulment - Functioning of the financial markets - Requirements for the carrying out of the statutory audit of annual and consolidated financial statements of public-interest entities - Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 - Rules on the organisation and selection of statutory auditors and audit firms by public-interest entities - No individual concern - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2017/C 104/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Carsten René Beul (represented by: H.-M. Pott and T. Eckhold, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: D. Warin and P. Schonard, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Balta and R. Wiemann, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Carsten René Beul is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 63/12

Order of the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) of 10 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dublin District Court — Ireland) — Criminal proceedings against Owen Pardue

(Case C-321/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Preamble and Articles 6, 20, 41, 47 and 48 - Powers of the national criminal prosecution authorities - Failure to implement EU law - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2017/C 063/17)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Dublin District Court

Criminal proceedings against

Owen Pardue

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Dublin District Court (Ireland) by decision of 27 May 2016.

(1) OJ C 279, 1.6.2016
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 161/18

Order of the President of the Court of 6 March 2017 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, intervener: French Republic

(Case C-511/16) (1)

(2017/C 161/25)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/2

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 February 2017 — Ante Šumelj and Others v European Commission

(Case C-239/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Action for damages - Act of accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union - Commitments relating to a strategy for judicial reform - Creation followed by the abolition of the position of public bailiff - Damage suffered by persons appointed as public bailiffs - Monitoring of the Republic of Croatia’s commitments by the European Commission - Appeal dismissed - Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part))

(2017/C 129/02)

Language of the case: Croatian

Parties

Appellants: Ante Šumelj, Dubravka Bašljan, Đurđica Crnčević, Miroslav Lovreković, Drago Burazer, Nikolina Nežić, Blaženka Bošnjak, Bosiljka Grbašić, Tea Tončić, Milica Bjelić, Marijana Kruhoberec, Davor Škugor, Ivan Gerometa, Kristina Samardžić, Sandra Cindrić, Sunčica Gložinić, Tomislav Polić, Vlatka Pižeta (represented by: M. Krmek, odvjetnik)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Ječmenica and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Ante Šumelj, Ms Dubravka Bašljan, Ms Đurđica Crnčević, Mr Miroslav Lovreković, Mr Drago Burazer, Ms Nikolina Nežić, Ms Blaženka Bošnjak, Ms Bosiljka Grbašić, Ms Tea Tončić, Ms Milica Bjelić, Ms Marijana Kruhoberec, Mr Davor Škugor, Mr Ivan Gerometa, Ms Kristina Samardžić, Ms Sandra Cindrić, Ms Sunčica Gložinić, Mr Tomislav Polić and Ms Vlatka Pižeta are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/28

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 19 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — Belgium) — État belge v Max-Manuel Nianga

(Case C-199/16) (1)

(2017/C 283/40)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/8

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 April 2017 — Sharif University of Technology v Council of the European Union

(Case C-385/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran - List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Criterion relating to the material, logistical or financial support to the Government of Iran - Cooperation in research and technological development in military or military-related fields))

(2017/C 202/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Sharif University of Technology (represented by: M. Happold, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Sharif University of Technology shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/7

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Giovanna Judith Kerr v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-615/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 15(2) and Article 135(1)(f) - Rights to use immovable property - Exemptions - Scope - Concept of ‘negotiation’))

(2018/C 032/09)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Giovanna Judith Kerr

Defendant: Fazenda Pública

Operative part of the order

Article 15(2) and Article 135(1)(f) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘negotiation’, within the meaning of the latter provision, may relate to an activity, such as that developed by the applicant in the main proceedings, provided that that activity is that of an intermediary paid to provide a service to one of the parties to a contract concerning financial transactions in respect of title to property, that service consisting of taking the necessary steps to ensure that the vendor and buyer sign that contract, without the intermediary himself signing the contract and, in any event, without that intermediary having any interest in the content of that contract. It is for the referring court to determine whether those conditions are fulfilled in the case before it.

(1) OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 402/20

Order of the President of the Court of 14 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons — Belgium) — Cabinet d’Orthopédie Stainier SPRL v Belgium State

(Case C-592/16) (1)

(2017/C 402/25)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.
Case C-589/16: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Mario Alexander Filippi and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Mario Alexander Filippi and Others

(Case C-589/16) ( 1 )

‛(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)’

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Mario Alexander Filippi, Martin Manigatterer, Play For Me GmbH, ATG GmbH, Christian Vöcklinger, Gmalieva s.r.o., PBW GmbH, Felicitas GmbH, Celik KG, Christian Guzy, Martin Klein, Shopping Center Wels Einkaufszentrum GmbH, Game Zone Entertainment AG, Fortuna Advisory Kft., Finanzamt Linz, Klara Matyiko

Other parties to the proceedings: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich, Bezirkshauptmann von Eferding, Bezirkshauptmann von Ried im Innkreis, Bezirkshauptmann von Linz-Land

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Regional Administrative Court, Upper Austria, Austria), by decision of 16 November 2016, is manifestly inadmissible.

( 1 ) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/18

Order of the President of the Court of 16 February 2018 — Council of the European Union v PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas), European Commission, European Biodiesel Board (EBB)

(Case C-606/16 P) (1)

(2018/C 190/27)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/8

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — VE v WD

(Case C-232/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Credit agreement denominated in a foreign currency - Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 032/11)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VE

Defendant: WD

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság (Central District Court, Buda, Hungary), by decision of 10 April 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 5/16

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga — Portugal) — Caixa Económica Montepio Geral v Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho and Others

(Case C-333/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 21 and 38 - Non-discrimination - Consumer protection - Contract for a bank loan - Question which does not concern a rule of EU law other than those contained in the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2018/C 005/22)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Caixa Económica Montepio Geral

Defendants: Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho, Maria de Lurdes Coelho Pimenta Marinho, Daniel Pimenta Marinho, Vera da Conceição Pimenta Marinho

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga (District Court, Braga, Portugal) by decision of 29 March 2017.

(1) OJ C 256, 07.08.2017
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/20

Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Anja Oehlke, Wolfgang Oehlke v TUIfly GmbH

(Case C-533/17) (1)

(2018/C 190/36)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 142/18

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 February 2018 — GX v European Commission

(Case C-233/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure - Civil service - Open Competition EPSO/AD/248/13 - Decision not to include the appellant on the reserve list))

(2018/C 142/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: GX (represented by: G.-M. Enache, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and P. Mihaylova, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. GX shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.
Case C-402/17 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 May 2018 — JYSK sp. z o.o. v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Refusal to grant a financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the major project ‘European Shared Services Centre’ — Action for annulment — Undertaking responsible for project implementation — Conditions of admissibility — Lack of direct concern)

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 May 2018 — JYSK sp. z o.o. v European Commission

(Case C-402/17 P) ( 1 )

‛(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Refusal to grant a financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the major project ‘European Shared Services Centre’ — Action for annulment — Undertaking responsible for project implementation — Conditions of admissibility — Lack of direct concern)’

Parties

Appellant: JYSK sp. z o.o. (represented by: H. Sønderby Christensen, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. JYSK sp. z o.o. shall pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.
Case C-102/17: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 April 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Contas — Portugal) — Secretaria Regional de Saúde dos Açores v Ministério Público (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of a ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Proceedings intended to lead to a decision of a judicial nature — National court of auditors — Prior review of the legality and budgetary justification of public expenditure — Manifest inadmissibility)

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 April 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Contas — Portugal) — Secretaria Regional de Saúde dos Açores v Ministério Público

(Case C-102/17) ( 1 )

‛(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of a ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Proceedings intended to lead to a decision of a judicial nature — National court of auditors — Prior review of the legality and budgetary justification of public expenditure — Manifest inadmissibility)’

Referring court

Tribunal de Contas

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Secretaria Regional de Saúde dos Açores

Interested party: Ministério Público

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Tribunal de Contas (Court of Auditors, Portugal), by decision of 17 January 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.

( 1 ) OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 September 2018 — Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU v Research Executive Agency

(Case C-241/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Projects financed by the European Union in the area of research - Seventh Framework programme for research and technological development (2007-2013) - Inachus and ZONeSEC projects - Decision not to allow the appellant to take part - Action for annulment and declaration of liability))

(2018/C 408/44)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU (represented by: J.J. Marín López, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: Research Executive Agency (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou, V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and J. Rivas Andrés, abogado)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

2. Holistic Innovation Institute SLU shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 2 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Rotterdam — Netherlands) — Sandd B.V. v Autoriteit Consument en Markt, intervener: Koninklijke PostNL BV

(Case C-256/17) (1)

(2018/C 341/15)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 29 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Gmalieva s.r.o., Manfred Naderhirn, in the presence of: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich, Bezirkshauptmann von Linz-Land

(Case C-633/17) (1)

(2019/C 288/45)

Language of the case: German

The President has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 12 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — X v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, other parties: Nederlandse Orde van Belastingadviseurs, Loyens Loeff NV

(Case C-157/17) (1)

(2019/C 103/20)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 168, 29.5.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 9 August 2018 (request for a preliminary decision from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Equitalia centro SpA v Poste Italiane SpA

(Case C-284/18) (1)

(2018/C 399/42)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Almería — Spain) — Banco Mare Nostrum S.A. v Ignacio Jesús Berenguel Nieto, Carmen Sonia Salinas López

(Case C-147/18) (1)

(2018/C 341/21)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 December 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Poland, supported by: Kingdom of Belgium, French Republic

(Case C-206/18) (1)

(2019/C 103/24)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 182, 28.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 23 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Göteborg — Sweden) — AA v Migrationsverket

(Case C-526/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/32)

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 381, 22.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 8 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin — Germany) — Sundair GmbH v WV, XU, YT, ZS

(Case C-660/18) (1)

(2019/C 172/36)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2019 — Verein Deutsche Sprache eV v European Commission

(Case C-440/18 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a Commission decision concerning the alteration of the appearance of the press room in the Berlaymont Building to display only the French and English languages - Refusal to grant full access))

(2019/C 112/13)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Verein Deutsche Sprache eV (represented by: W. Ehrhardt, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Verein Deutsche Sprache eV is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.
Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — María Teresa Aragón Carrasco and Others v Administración del Estado

(Case C-367/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Principle of non-discrimination - Comparability of situations - Justification - Clause 5 - Compensation in the event of termination for an objective reason of an employment contract for an indefinite period - No compensation upon the termination of the post of workers employed as auxiliary staff)

(2019/C 288/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: María Teresa Aragón Carrasco, María Eugenia Cotano Montero, María Gloria Ferratges Castellanos, Raquel García Ferratges, Elena Muñoz Mora, Ángela Navas Chillón, Mercedes Noriega Bosch, Susana Rizo Santaella, Desamparados Sánchez Ramos, Lucía Santana Ruiz, Luis Salas Fernández (heir of Lucía Sánchez de la Peña)

Defendant: Administración del Estado

Operative part of the order

1. Clause 4, point 1, of the Framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is included in the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which does not provide for the payment of any compensation to workers employed as members of auxiliary staff performing duties consisting in positions of trust or involving the performance of special advisory functions, such as the workers at issue in the main proceedings, upon the termination at the employer’s discretion of their post, whereas compensation is allocated to staff employed under a contract for an indefinite period upon the termination of their employment contract for an objective reason.

2. The second and third questions referred by the Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court, Spain) are manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Ninth of the Court of 8 April 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Croatia

(Case C-391/18) (1)

(2019/C 280/46)

Language of the case: Croatian

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.