ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 15 May 2019 — Metrans v Commission and INEA

(Case T-262/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - Commission decision granting financing for the ‘Multimodal Container Terminal Paskov, Phase III’ and ‘Intermodal Terminal Mělník, Phases 2 and 3’ transport project proposals under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Delay - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 246/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Metrans a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: A. Schwarz, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and J. Samnadda, acting as Agents), Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (represented by: I. Ramallo and D. Silhol, acting as Agents, and A. Duron, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for (i) annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 5047 final of 5 August 2016 establishing the list of proposals selected for receiving EU financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector following the calls for proposals launched on 5 November 2015 based on the Multi-Annual Work Programme, in so far as it concerns two proposals entitled ‘Multimodal Container Terminal Paskov, Phase III’ and ‘Intermodal Terminal Mělník, Phases 2 and 3’, and (ii) annulment of the two grant agreements relating to those two proposals signed by the INEA.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Metrans a.s. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA).

(1) OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.
Order of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Bowles v ECB

(Case T-447/17) (1)

((Civil Service - ECB Staff - Appointment decision concerning the post of Adviser to the President and Coordinator of the Counsel to the Executive Board - No act adversely affecting the applicant - No interest in bringing proceedings - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2019/C 65/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Carlos Bowles (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: B. Ehlers and F. Malfrère, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, the annulment (i) of the decision of the Executive Board of the ECB of 31 January 2017 to appoint M.S. to the post of Adviser to the President and Coordinator of the Counsel to the Executive Board (ii) of the decision not to appoint the applicant to that post and (iii) of the decision not to allow the applicant to apply for that post and, secondly, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Mr Carlos Bowles shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2022 — Deichmann v Commission

(Case T-154/17) (1)

(2023/C 45/43)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.
Order of the General Court of 18 September 2019 — ClientEarth v Commission

(Case T-677/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - Internal market - Environment - Regulation (EU) 2017/1154 - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 423/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Jones, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Becker, G. Gattinara and M. Huttunen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment in part of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1154 of 7 June 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 1230/2012 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards real-driving emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) (OJ 2017 L 175, p. 708).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 392, 20.11.2017.
Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2018 — Aquino and Others v Parliament

(Case T-402/18 R)

((Interim measures - Law governing the institutions - Interpreters’ strike action - Measures of requisition of interpreters adopted by the European Parliament - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Application for interim measures - Inadmissible in part - Balance of interests))

(2018/C 392/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Roberto Aquino (Brussels, Belgium) and the 30 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking, first, the suspension of the application of the decisions of the European Parliament of 2 and 3 July 2018 requisitioning interpreters and future decisions requisitioning interpreters on 5, 10 and 11 July 2018 and, second, an order that the Parliament limit the requisitions of interpreters in future.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 June 2018 — Strabag Belgium v Parliament

(Case T-299/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Public works contracts - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Waiting period - Abnormally low tender - Prima facie case - No urgency))

(2018/C 301/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Strabag Belgium (Anvers, Belgium) (represented by: M. Schoups, K. Lemmens and M. Lahbib, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: P. López-Carceller, Z. Nagy and B. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of the decision of the Parliament of 19 April 2018 to maintain in force its decision of 24 November 2017 rejecting the applicant’s tender and awarding to five tenderers a framework contract involving general contractor works for Parliament buildings in Brussels (Belgium) (call for tenders 06/D 20/2017/M036).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Wirecard v EUIPO — AXA Banque (boon.)

(Case T-2/18) (1)

(2019/C 44/113)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Delfant-Hoylaerts v Commission

(Case T-17/18) (1)

(2018/C 427/138)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.
Order of the General Court of 23 January 2019 — Prigent v Commission

(Case T-436/18) (1)

((Action for annulment - Decision to take no further action on a complaint - Refusal of the Commission to bring infringement proceedings - Act not open to challenge - No direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 93/82)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Claude Prigent (Caudan, France) (represented by: A. Bove, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 23 May 2018 not to take any further action on the applicant’s complaint seeking a declaration that the French authorities infringed Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (OJ 2009 L 335, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Claude Prigent shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2018 — Darmanin v EASO

(Case T-116/18) (1)

(2019/C 65/61)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — eSlovensko Bratislava v Commission

(Case T-460/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public procurement - Set-off of claims - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 139/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: eSlovensko Bratislava (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: B. Fridrich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Verheecke, J. Estrada de Solà and F. van den Berghe, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision contained in the Commission’s letter of 22 June 2018 seeking to recover the sum of EUR 229 711.16 by way of set-off of the payment to be made by the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) to the applicant against a claim of the Commission in respect of eSlovensko.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 328, 17.9.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Chrome Hearts v EUIPO — Shenzhen Van St. Lonh Jewelry (Representation of a cross)

(Case T-137/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a cross - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 131/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chrome Hearts LLC (Hollywood, California, United States) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Shenzhen Van St. Lonh Jewelry Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2017 (Case R 766/2017-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Chrome Hearts and Shenzhen Van St. Lonh Jewelry Co.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — OLX v EUIPO — Stra (STRADIA)

(Case T-508/18) (1)

(2019/C 213/79)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 March 2019 — Silgan Closures and Silgan Holdings v Commission

(Case T-410/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in metal packaging - Decision to open an investigation - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 164/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Silgan Closures GmbH (Munich, Germany), Silgan Holdings, Inc. (Stamford, Connecticut, United States) (represented by: H. Wollmann, D. Seeliger, R. Grafunder and V. Weiss, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou, B. Ernst, G. Meessen, C. Vollrath and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 2466 final of 19 April 2018, by which the Commission initiated a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU in case AT.40522 — Pandora.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany and the Council of the European Union.

3. Silgan Closures GmbH and Silgan Holdings, Inc., shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

4. The Federal Republic of Germany and the Council shall bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.
Order of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Carvalho and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-330/18) (1)

(Action for annulment and damages - Environment - Greenhouse gas emissions - 2030 climate and energy package - Directive (EU) 2018/410 - Regulation (EU) 2018/842 - Regulation (EU) 2018/841 - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 230/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Armando Carvalho (Santa Comba Dão, Portugal) and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: G. Winter, Professor, R. Verheyen, lawyer, and H. Leith, Barrister)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Darie and A. Tamás, acting as Agents), and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and M. Simm, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking, first, annulment in part of Directive (EU) 2018/410 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2018 amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 (OJ 2018 L 76, p. 3), in particular Article 1 thereof, Regulation (EU) 2018/842 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 contributing to climate action to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 (OJ 2018 L 156, p. 26), in particular Article 4(2) thereof and Annex I thereto, and Regulation (EU) 2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry in the 2030 climate and energy framework, and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 and Decision No 529/2013/EU (OJ 2018 L 156, p. 1), in particular Article 4 thereof, and, second, compensation under Articles 268 and 340 TFEU in the form of an injunction for the damage that the applicants claim to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Climate Action Network Europe, WeMove Europe SCE mbH, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bäuerliche Landwirtschaft and the European Commission.

3. Mr Armando Carvalho and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex are to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

4. Climate Action Network Europe, WeMove Europe, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bäuerliche Landwirtschaft and the Commission are to bear their own costs in relation to their applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2019 — Apera Capital Master v EUIPO — Altera Capital (APERA CAPITAL)

(Case T-699/18) (1)

(2019/C 230/79)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 44, 4.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 September 2019 — Athanasiadou and Soulantikas v Commission

(Case T-762/18 R)

(Application for interim relief - Financial provisions (budget, financial framework, own resources, combating fraud) - Enforcement - Application for suspension - Admissibility - No urgency)

(2019/C 363/22)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Sofia Athanasiadou (Athens, Greece), Konstantinos Soulantikas (Athens) (represented by: M. Lappa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Katsimerou and A. Kyratsou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 299 TFEU for suspension of enforcement of Commission Decision C(2017) 5883 final of 22 August 2017, of the order to pay of 30 October 2018, affixed to the copy of the enforcement order issued on the basis of Commission Decision C(2017) 5883 final of 22 August 2017, and of any other related enforcement measure.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 12 June 2019 — Durand and Others v Parliament

(Case T-702/18) (1)

(Actions for failure to act and for annulment - Agricultural policy - Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 - Animal welfare - Request by Members of the European Parliament to set up an inquiry committee - Defined position of the Parliament - Act not open to challenge - Informative act - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 255/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Pascal Durand (Paris, France) and the seven other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: O. Brouwer and E. Raedts, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action, principally, pursuant to Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Parliament, by decision taken by the Conference of Presidents of the Parliament, unlawfully failed to act on a request of 17 July 2018 seeking the setting up of an inquiry committee and, in the alternative, seeking the annulment, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, of the decision contained in the letter of the President of the Parliament of 21 September 2018.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Pascal Durand and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — ZW v EIB

(Case T-727/18 R)

(Interim measures - Civil service - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 432/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZW (represented by: T. Petsas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures to suspend or to extend certain time limits and to order the production of documents.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — RATP v Commission

(Case T-250/18) (1)

(2019/C 399/123)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — Sensient Colors Europe v Commission

(Case T-556/18) (1)

(2020/C 201/70)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commission

(Case T-734/18) (1)

(2020/C 68/79)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Nessim Daoud and Others v Council and Others

(Case T-208/18) (1)

(2021/C 252/60)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 18.6.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Grange Backup Power v Commission

(Case T-110/18) (1)

(2021/C 19/78)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — adidas International Trading and Others v Commission

(Case T-130/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/52)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 August 2022 — Batchelor v Commission

(Case T-85/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party independent of the applicant - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 398/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Edward William Batchelor (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Hoorelbeke, lawyer and M. Healy, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Mr Edward William Batchelor, seeks the annulment of European Commission Decision C(2017) 8430 final of 5 December 2017 in so far as it refused him access to the ethics declaration of a director of the institution and indicated that it did not hold any other document falling within the scope of his application for access to documents (‘the contested decision’).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Edward William Batchelor is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 September 2019 — Nosio v EUIPO — Passi (PASSIATA)

(Case T-142/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 399/86)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nosio SpA (Mezzocorona, Italy) (represented by: J. Graffer and A. Ottolini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. L. Capostagno and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Passi AG (Rothrist, Switzerland)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 November 2018 (Case R 927/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Passi and Nosio.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Nosio SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.
Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — CE v Committee of the Regions

(Case T-355/19 R)

(Interim relief - Civil service - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

(2019/C 328/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions (represented by: J.C. Cañoto Argüelles, M. Esparrago Arzadun and S. Bachotet, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, suspension of the operation of, primarily, the decision of the Committee of the Regions of 17 April 2019 terminating the applicant’s contract, and, in the alternative, the letter of the Committee of the Regions of 16 May 2019 concerning the conditions relating to the notice period, and, secondly, the adoption of interim measures relating to the terms of the notice period.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.