ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 236/21

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Argenta Spaarbank NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-578/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Corporation taxes - Directive 90/435/EEC - Article 1(2) and Article 4(2) - Parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States - Common system of taxation - Deduction of taxable profits of the parent company - Factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Insufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 236/30)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Argenta Spaarbank NV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (Belgium), by Decision of 28 November 2014, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 81, 9.3.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 398/8

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2015 — Arnoldo Mondadori Editore SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Grazia Equity GmbH

(Case C-548/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Application for registration of the word mark GRAZIA - Opposition by the proprietor of the international, Community and national word and figurative marks including the word element ‘GRAZIA’ - Rejection of the opposition - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(5) - Reputation))

(2015/C 398/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore SpA (represented by: G. Dragotti, R. Valenti, S. Balice and E. Varese, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent) and Grazia Equity GmbH (represented by: M. Müller, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Arnoldo Mondadori Editore SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

3. Grazia Equity GmbH shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/8

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 May 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Slovenská autobusová doprava Trnava a.s. v Krajský úřad Olomouckého kraje

(Case C-318/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Articles 49 TFEU and 52 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 - Public transport by rail and by road - Bus transport on urban public transport lines - Carrier established in another Member State and operating through a branch - Requirement to obtain special authorisation - Discretionary power of the competent authority - Public service contract))

(2015/C 320/11)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Slovenská autobusová doprava Trnava a.s.

Defendant: Krajský úřad Olomouckého kraje

Operative part of the order

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State requiring only foreign carriers which have a branch office in that Member State to obtain special authorisation issued on a discretionary basis by the competent authorities in order to operate an urban public transport service by road in the territory of that Member State alone.

(1) OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 270/10

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Andrea Gaiti, Sidi Amidou Billa, Joseph Arasomwan, Giuseppe Carissimi, Sahabou Songne

(Case C-534/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Identical questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Betting and gaming - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences for a shorter term than that of the former licences - Transfer, free of charge, of the rights to use tangible and intangible assets owned constituting the network for the management and collection of bets - Restriction - Overriding reasons in the public interest - Proportionality))

(2016/C 270/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Bergamo

Criminal proceedings against

Andrea Gaiti, Sidi Amidou Billa, Joseph Arasomwan, Giuseppe Carissimi, Sahabou Songne

Operative part of the order

1. Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation on betting and gaming, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders for the award of licences with a shorter period of validity than that of the licences awarded in the past on account of the reorganisation of the system through the alignment of licence expiry dates.

2. Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a restrictive national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires a licensee of a betting and gambling service to transfer, free of charge, on the cessation of business as a result of the expiry of the final term of the licence, the rights to use tangible and intangible assets which he owns and which constitute his network for the management and collection of bets, in so far as that restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the objective actually pursued by that provision, which is for the referring court to verify.

(1) OJ C 34, 2.2.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/12

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Tamoil Italia SpA v Ministero dell'Ambiente e delle Tutela del Territorio e del Mare

(Case C-156/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 191(2) TFEU - Directive 2004/35/EC - Environmental liability - National legislation under which no provision is made for the administrative authorities to require owners of polluted land who have not contributed to that pollution to carry out preventive and remedial measures, and the sole obligation imposed concerns the reimbursement of the measures undertaken by those authorities - Whether compatible with the ‘polluter pays’ principle, the precautionary principle and the principles that preventive action should be taken and that environmental damage should be rectified at source as a matter of priority)

(2016/C 038/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tamoil Italia SpA

Defendant: Ministero dell'Ambiente e delle Tutela del Territorio e del Mare

Intervening party: Provincia di Venezia, Comune di Venezia, Regione Veneto

Operative part of the order

Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings which, where it is impossible to identify the polluter of a plot of land or to have that person adopt remedial measures, does not permit the competent authority to require the owner of the land (who is not responsible for the pollution) to adopt preventive and remedial measures, that person being required merely to reimburse the costs relating to the measures undertaken by the competent authority within the limit of the market value of the site, determined after those measures have been carried out.

(1) OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2016 — Romonta GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-565/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Article 10a - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 - Decision 2011/278/EU - National implementation measures submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany - Rejection of the registration of certain installations on the lists of installations receiving free allocations of emission allowances - Provision relating to cases of ‘undue hardship’ - Implementing powers of the Commission))

(2016/C 454/15)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Romonta GmbH (represented by: I. Zenke and M.-Y. Vollmer, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. White, C. Hermes and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Romonta GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/3

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 April 2016 — Dansk Automat Brancheforening v European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark, Betfair Group plc, Betfair International Ltd, European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA)

(Case C-563/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Action for annulment - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - Right to bring an action - Locus standi - Natural or legal persons - State aid - Decision declaring an aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Act of individual concern to the appellant - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures))

(2016/C 279/03)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Appellant: Dansk Automat Brancheforening (represented by: K. Dyekjær, T. Høg and J. Flodgaard, advokater)

Other parties to the proceedings:

European Commission (represented by: L. Grønfeldt and M. P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: C. Thorning, acting as Agent and R. Holdgaard, advokat), Betfair Group plc, Betfair International Ltd (represented by: A. Pliego Selie, O. Brouwer and M. Groothuismink, advocaten), European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) (represented by: J. Heithecker, C.-D. Ehlermann and J. Ylinen, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Dansk Automat Brancheforening is ordered to pay the costs.

3. The Kingdom of Denmark is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/17

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2015 — ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias v European Commission

(Case C-2/15 SA) (1)

((Application for authorisation to serve an attachment order on the Commission))

(2016/C 038/24)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (represented by: S. Paliou, dikigoros)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1) The application is rejected.

2) ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/11

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Vivium SA v Belgische Staat

(Case C-250/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Insufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 381/13)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vivium SA

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (Belgium) by decision of 13 May 2015 (Case C-250/15) is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/4

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2016 — Skype Ultd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Sky plc, formerly British Sky Broadcasting Group plc, Sky IP International Ltd

(Case C-382/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 136/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Skype Ultd (represented by: A. Carboni and M. Browne, Solicitors)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent), Sky plc, formerly British Sky Broadcasting Group plc, Sky IP International Ltd (represented by: D. Rose and J. Curry, Solicitors)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to rule on the appeal.

2. Skype Ultd shall pay the costs of the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/12

Order of the President of the Court of 15 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Lufthansa Cargo AG v Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu

(Case C-470/15) (1)

(2016/C 078/18)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/36

Order of the President of the Court of 16 March 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-545/15) (1)

(2016/C 260/44)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/4

Order of the Court of 17 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Alcobendas — Spain) — Ibercaja Banco SAU v José Cortés González

(Case C-613/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Mortgage loans - Term relating to default interest - Early repayment term - Power of the national court - Time limit))

(2016/C 200/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Alcobendas (Spain)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ibercaja Banco SAU

Defendant: José Cortés González

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 2003 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that:

— Article 3(1) and Article 4(1) thereof do not permit the law of a Member State to restrict the discretion of a national court in respect of a finding of unfair terms in a mortgage contract concluded between a consumer and a professional, and

— Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) thereof require that national law may not prevent that court from setting aside such a term if it were found to be ‘unfair’, within the meaning of Article 3(1) of that directive.

(1) OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/4

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 April 2016 — Makro autoservicio mayorista SA, Vestel Iberia SL v European Commission, Kingdom of Spain

(Joined Cases C-264/15 P and C-265/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 181 - Article 263 TFEU - Situation of a person not directly affected by the decision under appeal - Customs union - Subsequent entry in the accounts and remission of import duties - Reception apparatus for colour television sets from Turkey))

(2016/C 279/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Makro autoservicio mayorista SA, Vestel Iberia SL (represented by: P. De Baere and P. Muñiz, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and A. Caeiros, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Makro autoservicio mayorista SA and Vestel Iberia SL shall pay the costs.

3. The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/24

Order of the President of the Eighth of the Court of 11 May 2016 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-481/15) (1)

(2016/C 279/33)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 343/10

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Município de Vila Pouca de Aguiar v Sá Machado & Filhos SA

(Case C-214/15) (1)

((Preliminary ruling - Public works contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 55 - Contract notice - Tender not accompanied by justification for abnormally low prices - Determination criteria - Article 7(c) - Value of the contract - Threshold not reached - Certain cross-border interest - Lack of information - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 343/14)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Município de Vila Pouca de Aguiar

Defendant: Sá Machado & Filhos SA

In the presence of: Norcep Construções e Empreendimentos Lda

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Supreme Administrative Court, Portugal), by decision of 9 April 2015, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 343/12

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2016 — Matratzen Concord GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), KBT & Co. Ernst Kruchen agenzia commercial sociétá in accomandita

(Case C-295/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - EU trade mark - EU word mark ARKTIS - Application for revocation - Genuine use of the mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 51(1)(a) - Form of use of the mark - Proof of use of the mark - Consent of the proprietor - Partial rejection of the application for revocation))

(2016/C 343/17)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Matratzen Concord GmbH (represented by: I. Selting, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Schifko, Agent), KBT & Co. Ernst Kruchen agenzia commercial sociétá in accomandita (represented by: K. Schulze Horn, Rechtsanwältin)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Matratzen Concord GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 475/8

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2016 — Diputación Foral de Bizkaia v European Commission

(Case C-426/15 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - State aid - Article 108(3) TFEU - Commission decision declaring aid to be unlawful - No prior notification - Determination of the date of award of the aid - Agreements granting aid - Unconditional commitment to award aid - Taking into account of national legislation - Formal investigation procedure - Principle of sound administration - Rights of the defence)

(2016/C 475/10)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Diputación Foral de Bizkaia (represented by: I. Sáenz-Cortabarría Fernández, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková and É. Gippini Fournier, acting as agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Diputación Foral de Bizkaia shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 July 2016 — Claire Staelen v European Ombudsman

(Case C-338/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Non-contractual liability - Handling by the European Ombudsman of a complaint concerning the management of a list of suitable candidates following an open competition - Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 181))

(2016/C 454/19)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Claire Staelen (represented by: V. Olona, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Ombudsman (represented: initially by G. Grill, and subsequently by L. Papadias, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

1. The appeal is rejected.

2. Claire Staelen is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 300/27

Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 19 June 2017 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-606/15) (1)

(2017/C 300/31)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/31

Order of the President of the Court of 23 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Castellón — Spain) — Banco Popular Español SA v Elena Lucaciu, Cristian Laurentiu Lucaciu

(Case C-349/15) (1)

(2017/C 112/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 302, 4.9.2015.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 September 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 60 de Madrid — Spain) — Caixabank SA v Héctor Benlliure Santiago (C-91/16), Abanca Corporación Bancaria SA v Juan José González Rey, María Consuelo González Rey, Francisco Rodríguez Alonso (C-120/16)

(Joined Cases C-91/16 and C-120/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms - Default interest rate - Application of the remunerative interest rate - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 454/27)

Language of the cases: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 60 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Caixabank SA (C-91/16), Abanca Corporación Bancaria SA (C-120/16)

Defendants: Héctor Benlliure Santiago (C-91/16), Juan José González Rey, María Consuelo González Rey, Francisco Rodríguez Alonso (C-120/16)

Operative part of the order

The requests for a preliminary ruling made by the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 60 de Madrid (Court of First Instance No 60, Madrid, Spain), by decisions of 8 February 2016 (Case C-91/16) and of 18 February 2016 (Case C-120/16), are manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/20

Order of the President of the Court of 20 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Irene Uhden v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines N.V.

(Case C-40/16) (1)

(2016/C 326/36)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.