ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 402/46

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — POA v Commission

(Case T-584/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Application for registration of a protected designation of origin (‘Halloumi’ or ‘Hellim’) - Decision to publish in the Official Journal, C series, an application for registration of a protected designation of origin pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Preparatory measure - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 402/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon Dimosia Ltd (POA) (Latsia, Cyprus) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis and J. Guillem Carrau, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decision to publish in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2015 C 246, p. 9) application for registration No CY/PDO/0005/01243, introduced by the Republic of Cyprus, inasmuch as it found that that application met the conditions laid down by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1), as referred to in Article 50(1) of that regulation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon Dimosia Ltd (POA) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 406, 7.12.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2016 — Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v Commission

(Case T-564/15) (1)

((Actions for annulment - Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 454/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Glazener, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and J. Samnadda, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the email of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) of 17 July 2015, relating to the proposal submitted by the applicant in response to the call for proposals launched under the Connecting Europe Facility on the basis of the Multi-Annual Work Programme adopted in 2014 pursuant to Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921 of 26 March 2014 establishing the 2014 Multi-Annual Work Programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/36

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Othman v Council

(Case T-711/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/64)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/17

Order of the General Court of 28 March 2017 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (Viewty)

(Case T-498/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Wulff and U. Hildebrandt, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 June 2015 (Joined Cases R 1935/2014-2 and R 1563/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH and LG Electronics, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. LG Electronics, Inc., is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/43

Order of the General Court of 19 January 2017 — Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft v EUIPO — Fédération Internationale des Logis (T)

(Case T-756/15) (1)

(2017/C 078/60)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 134/21

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 February 2018 — Iberdrola v Commission

(Case T-260/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - Aid scheme provided for under Spanish tax legislation - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2018/C 134/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Iberdrola, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/314 of 15 October 2014 on State aid SA.35550 (13/C) (ex 13/NN) (ex 12/CP) implemented by Spain — Scheme for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions (OJ 2015 L 56, p. 38).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.

2. The order of 24 November 2017, Iberdrola v Commission (T-260/15 R), is revoked.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 300/29

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — myToys.de v EUIPO — Laboratorios Indas (myBaby)

(Case T-519/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark myBaby - Earlier EU word, and EU figurative and national word marks MAYBABY, May BaBy and MAY BABY - Ancillary appeal - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 - Merely confirmatory decision - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 300/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: myToys.de GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Hauss-Löhde and M. Mette, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Laboratorios Indas, SA (Pozuelo de Alarcon, Spain) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 June 2015 (Case R 1002/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Indas and myToys.de.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. The action is dismissed;

2. myToys.de GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Laboratorios Indas, SA;

3. European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl and Others v Commission

(Case T-605/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl (Düsseldorf, Germany) and the other 17 applicants whose names are annexed to the order (represented by: H. Janssen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl and the other 17 applicants whose names are annexed to the order.

(1) OJ C 27, 26.1.2016
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 May 2019 — Novartis Europharm v Commission

(Case T-269/15) (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Vantobra - tobramycine - Withdrawal of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 246/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Novartis Europharm Ltd (Camberley, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Šimerdová, A. Sipos and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Pari Pharma GmbH (Starnberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Epping and W. Rehmann, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 1977 final of 18 March 2015 granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Vantobra — tobramycine, in accordance with Regulation No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council,

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Novartis Europharm Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. Pari Pharma GmbH shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/48

Order of the President of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — Eurofast v Commission

(Case T-87/16 R)

((Application for interim measures - Subsidies - Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Letters requesting reimbursement of part of the subsidies granted - Debit note - Set-off - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2016/C 156/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Eurofast SARL (Paris, France) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude, J. Estrada de Solà and L. Cappelletti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, essentially, for suspension of operation of the set-off decision contained in the Commission’s letter of 17 December 2015 addressed to the applicant and seeking recovery of EUR 69 923,68owed under a subsidy contract.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/38

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 November 2016 — Solelec and Others v Parliament

(Case T-281/16 R)

((Interim measures - Public works contracts - Tendering procedure - Electrical work (high-voltage current) as part of the project for the extension and refurbishment of the Parliament’s Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg - Rejection of the bid submitted by a tenderer and decision to award the contract to another tenderer - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency))

(2017/C 006/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Solelec SA (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg), Mannelli & Associés SA (Bertrange), Paul Wagner et fils SA (Luxembourg), Socom SA (Foetz) (represented by: S. Marx, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Mraz and L. Chrétien, agents)

Re:

Action on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the operation, first, of the decision of the Parliament of 27 May 2016 to reject the tender submitted by the applicants for lot No 75 in connection with a call for tenders with reference INLO-D-UPIL-T-15-AO6, concerning the project for the extension and refurbishment of the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg and, secondly, of the decision awarding that lot to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 9 June 2016 delivered in Case T-281/16 R is set aside.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 305/38

Order of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — Rabbit v EUIPO — DMG Media (rabbit)

(Case T-4/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 305/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rabbit, Inc. (Redwood City, California, United States) (represented by: M. Engelman, Barrister, and J. Stephenson, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O'Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: DMG Media Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 October 2015 (Case R 2133/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between DMG Media Ltd and Rabbit, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Rabbit, Inc. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 156, 2.5.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 70/31

Order of the General Court of 12 January 2017 — Belis v Commission

(Case T-557/16) (1)

(2017/C 070/41)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 294, 7.9.2005 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-97/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/60

Order of the General Court of 29 November 2016 — Gulli v EUIPO — Laverana (Lybera)

(Case T-284/16) (1)

(2017/C 022/81)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 121/32

Order of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Walton v Commission

(Case T-594/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Civil service - Temporary agents - Severance grant - Revision of the calculation - Res judicata - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 121/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Robert Walton (Oxford, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A.-C. Simon and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, seeking the annulment of the decision of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment notified by the Commission’s letter of 15 March 2016 rejecting as inadmissible the applicant’s request for revision of the calculation of the severance grant following his resignation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Robert Walton is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 251, 11.7.2016 (Case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-24/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/37

Order of the General Court of 7 February 2017 — Stips v Commission

(Case T-593/16) (1)

((Action for damages - Civil service - Temporary staff - No request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2017/C 112/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Adolf Stips (Besozzo, Italy) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant due to the delay in the organisation of the 2013 reclassification procedure.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2. Adolf Stips shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 251, 11.7.2016 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-23/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 161/30

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2017 — Banco Popular Español v EUIPO — Pledgeling (p)

(Case T-407/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 161/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Banco Popular Español, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pledgeling LLC (Houston, Texas, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2016 (Case R 1693/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Banco Popular Español, SA and Pledgeling LLC.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Banco Popular Español, SA shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 343, 19.9.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/62

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2017 — Isdin v EUIPO — Spirig Pharma (ERYFOTONA ACTINICA)

(Case T-117/16) (1)

(2017/C 144/92)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/28

Order of the General Court of 4 May 2017 — De Masi v Commission

(Case T-341/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Request for access on the basis of the inter-institutional cooperation by virtue of Article 230 TFEU - Documents concerning the work of the ‘Code of conduct (Business Taxation)’ group instituted by the Council - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 221/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Fabio De Masi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Fischer-Lescano, professor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision contained in the Commission’s letter of 8 June 2016, responding to the request of the President of the European Parliament’s Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect (TAXE2) for full access to the documents of the ‘Code of conduct (Business Taxation)’ group.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Fabio De Masi shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 287, 8.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/28

Order of the General Court of 2 March 2017 — Oberösterreichische Landesbank v CRU

(Case T-376/16) (1)

(2017/C 202/44)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 343, 19.9.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/19

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2017 — L'Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot (MASTER DUO)

(Case T-182/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MASTER DUO - Prior national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly unfounded in law - Article 126 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2017/C 269/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: L'Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Guinot (Paris) (represented by: A. Sion, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 (Case R 2916/2014-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Guinot and L’Oréal.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. L’Oréal shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 249/28

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 May 2017 — Enrico Colombo and Corinti Giacomo v Commission

(Case T-690/16 R)

((Interim measures - Public procurement - Application for interim measures - No urgency))

(2017/C 249/43)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Enrico Colombo SpA (Sesto Calende, Italy) and Corinti Giacomo (Ispra, Italy) (represented by: R. Colombo and G. Turri, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: P. Rosa Plaza, S. Delaude and L. Di Paolo, acting as Agents) and Carmet Sas di Fietta Graziella & C.

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures ordering, first, suspension of implementation of the Commission measures leading to the rejection of the applicants’ tender in the context of the call for tenders JRC/IPR/2016/C.4/0002/OC and, secondly, in essence, suspension of the contract concluded between the Commission and the successful tenderer in respect of that call for tenders.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures insofar as it is directed against Carmet Sas di Fietta Graziella & C.

2. The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 300/30

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v ERCEA

(Case T-348/16 OP-R)

((Interim measures - Arbitration clause - Judgment by default - Application for a stay of execution of the judgment - Lack of jurisdiction))

(2017/C 300/37)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant in the main proceedings: Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis (Thessalonica, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant in the main proceedings: European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) (represented by: M. Pesquera Alonso and F. Sgritta, acting as Agents, and by E. Kourakis, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 123(4) and Article 156 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court seeking a stay of execution of the judgment of 6 April 2017, Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v ERCEA (T-348/16, not published, EU:T:2017:268).

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/35

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2017 — Fair deal for expats and Others v Commission

(Case T-713/16) (1)

(2017/C 269/47)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 428, 21.11.2016.