ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/29

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2017 — Oy Karl Fazer v EUIPO — Kraft Foods Belgium Intellectual Property (MIGNON)

(Case T-437/17) (1)

(2018/C 013/45)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/42

Order of the General Court of 10 April 2018 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaïki Dynamiki v EIF

(Case T-320/17) (1)

(2018/C 190/67)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 152/36

Order of the General Court of 9 March 2018 — Naftogaz of Ukraine v Commission

(Case T-196/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2009/73/EC - Commission Decision on review of the exemption of the OPAL pipeline from the requirements on third-party access and tariff regulation - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 152/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: D. Mjaaland, A. Haga, M. Krakowiak and P. Grzejszczak, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: Y. G. Marinova, O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on the review of the conditions for exemption of the OPAL pipeline, granted under Directive 2003/55/EC, from the rules on third-party access and tariff regulation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene.

3. NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine shall bear its own costs and the costs of the European Commission.

4. Naftogaz of Ukraine, the Commission, OPAL Gastransport GmbH & Co. KG, Gazprom Eksport LLC and Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.
Case T-156/17: Order of the General Court of 20 June 2018 — L v Parliament (Civil Service — Accredited Parliamentary assistant — Termination of contract — Litispendence — Inadmissibility)

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2018 — L v Parliament

(Case T-156/17) ( 1 )

‛(Civil Service — Accredited Parliamentary assistant — Termination of contract — Litispendence — Inadmissibility)’

Parties

Applicant: L (represented by: I. Coutant Peyre, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Í. Ní Riagáin Düro and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 24 June 2016 to terminate the applicant’s contract of employment as an accredited Parliamentary assistant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.
Case T-357/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2018 — Aide et Action France v Commission

Order of the General Court of 15 May 2018 — Aide et Action France v Commission

(Case T-357/17) ( 1 )

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2018 — Medora Therapeutics v EUIPO — Biohealth Italia (LITHOREN)

(Case T-776/17) (1)

(2018/C 399/74)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2018 — So v Council and Commission

(Case T-564/17) (1)

(2018/C 311/22)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 338, 9.10.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2018 — Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D)

(Case T-413/17 INTP) (1)

((Procedure - Interpretation of a judgment - EU trade mark - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 436/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG (Tuttlingen, Germany) (represented by: S. Gruber and N. Siebertz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for interpretation of the judgment of 19 June 2018, Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D) (T-413/17, not published, EU:T:2018:356).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interpretation.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 24 September 2018 — Activa Minoristas del Popular v ECB and SRB

(Case T-618/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - Action for annulment - Association set up after the adoption of the contested measure - Lack of direct concern - Manifestly inadmissible)

(2018/C 427/93)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Activa Minoristas del Popular Asociación para la tutela de los inversores minoristas afectados por la resolución, supervisión y gestión del Banco Popular (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: C. Arredondo Díaz, lawyer)

Defendants: European Central Bank (represented by: R. Ugena Torrejon and A. Lefterov, acting as Agents), Single Resolution Board (represented initially by: B. Meyring, S. Schelo, F. Málaga Diéguez, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch, M. Bettermann, L. Baudenbacher and S. Ianc, and subsequently by: B. Meyring, S. Schelo, F. Málaga Diéguez, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch, M. Bettermann, S. Ianc and M. Rickert, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the SRB of 7 June 2017, concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, SA.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of Banco Santander, SA, Banco Popular Español, SA, the Kingdom of Spain, the European Commission and Chavela Inmuebles, SL.

3. Activa Minoristas del Popular Asociación para la tutela de los inversores minoristas afectados por la resolución, supervisión y gestión del Banco Popular shall pay the costs with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.

4. Banco Santander, Banco Popular Español, the Kingdom of Spain, the Commission and Chavela Inmuebles shall bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 3 December 2018 — Classic Media v EUIPO — Pirelli Tyre (CLASSIC DRIVER)

(Case T-811/17) (1)

((EU Trade Mark - Opposition Proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark CLASSIC DRIVER - Earlier EU word mark DRIVER - Relative Ground for Refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2019/C 44/89)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Classic Media AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Masberg, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Pirelli Tyre SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: T. M. Müller and F. Togo, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 October 2017 (Case R 59/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Pirelli Tyre and Classic Media.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Classic Media AG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2018 — CMS Hasche Sigle v EUIPO (WORLD LAW GROUP)

(Case T-756/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark WORLD LAW GROUP - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2019/C 44/86)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CMS Hasche Sigle Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten und Steuerberatern mbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: P.-C. Thielen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 August 2017 (Case R 329/2017-5), concerning an application for registration of the word sign WORLD LAW GROUP as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. CMS Hasche Sigle Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten und Steuerberatern mbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.
Order of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Strabag Belgium v Parliament

(Case T-784/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public works contracts - Tender procedure - General contractor works for European Parliament buildings in Brussels - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers - Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 155/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Strabag Belgium (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: initially by M. Schoups, K. Lemmens and M. Lahbib, and subsequently by M. Schoups and K. Lemmens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z. Nagy and B. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 24 November 2017 rejecting the applicant’s tender and awarding to five tenderers a framework contract involving general contractor works for Parliament buildings in Brussels (Belgium) (call for tenders 06D20/2017/M036) and, second, an order for the Parliament to produce various documents.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Parliament is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures;

3. The head of claim requesting that the Parliament be ordered to pay ‘procedural compensation’ is rejected as inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Euracoal and Others v Commission

(Case T-739/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Environment - Directive 2010/75/EU - Best available techniques conclusions - Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 65/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Association européenne du charbon et du lignite (Euracoal) (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium), Deutscher Braunkohlen-Industrie-Verein eV (Cologne, Germany), Lausitz Energie Kraftwerke AG (Cottbus, Germany), Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH (Zeitz, Germany), eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG (Chemnitz, Germany) (represented by: W. Spieth and N. Hellermann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Becker and K. Petersen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 of 31 July 2017 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants (OJ 2017 L 212, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Polska Grupa Energetyczna S.A. (PGE), the French Republic, Elektrárny Opatovice, a.s., and Saale Energie GmbH, Sev.en EC, a.s., Freistaat Sachsen, Elektrárna Počerady, a.s., the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) and Client Earth.

3. The Association européenne du charbon et du lignite (Euracoal), Deutscher Braunkohlen-Industrie-Verein eV, Lausitz Energie Kraftwerke AG, Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH and eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

4. Euracoal, Deutscher Braunkohlen-Industrie-Verein, Lausitz Energie Kraftwerke, Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft, eins energie in sachsen, the Commission, PGE, the French Republic, Elektrárny Opatovice and Saale Energie, Sev.en EC, Freistaat Sachsen, Elektrárna Počerady, the EEB and Client Earth shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.
Order of the General Court of 20 December 2021 — Niemelä and Others v ECB

(Case T-321/17) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - Loss of interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 109/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Heikki Niemelä (Ohain, Belgium), Mika Lehto (Espoo, Finland), Nemea plc (St Julians, Malta), Nevestor SA (Ohain), Nemea Bank plc (St Julians) (represented by: A. Meriläinen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta and A. Witte, acting as Agents, and by B. Schneider, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and A. Nijenhuis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank of 23 March 2017, ECB/SSM/2017 — 213800JENPXTUY75VSO/1 WHD-2017-0003, withdrawing Nemea Bank plc’s authorisation to operate as a credit institution and, second, under Article 268 TFEU, seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment.

2. The claim for compensation is dismissed as inadmissible.

3. Heikki Niemelä, Mika Lehto, Nemea plc, Nevestor SA and Nemea Bank plc and the European Central Bank (ECB) are ordered each to bear their own costs in relation to the application for annulment.

4. Heikki Niemelä, Mika Lehto, Nemea, Nevestor and Nemea Bank are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the ECB in relation to the claim for compensation.

5. The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 283, 28.8.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Beats Electronics (i.Beat jess)

(Case T-749/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate - Article 137 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Avoidable costs - Article 139(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court)

(2019/C 413/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: O. Spieker, M. Alber and A. Schönfleisch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by E. Markakis and D. Walicka, and subsequently by E. Markakis, A. Söder and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Beats Electronics LLC (Culver City, California, United States) (represented by: by M. Petersenn, lawyer, and I. Fowler, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 September 2017 (Case R 2236/2016-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Beats Electronics and TrekStor.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action and the cross-claim.

2. TrekStor Ltd and Beats Electronics LLC shall bear their own respective costs and each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. TrekStor and Beats Electronics shall each pay to the Court the sum of EUR 2 500 under Article 139(a) of its Rules of Procedure.

(1) OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 August 2018 — IFSUA v Council

(Case T-251/18 R)

((Interim measures - Fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks - Measures on European seabass fisheries - Ban on catches in recreational fisheries - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2018/C 381/30)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: International Forum for Sustainable Underwater Activities (IFSUA) (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: T. Gui Mori, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and P. Plaza García, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Morales Puerta, F. Moro and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 for the suspension of operation of Article 2(2) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Council Regulation (EU) 2018/120 of 23 January 2018 fixing for 2018 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/127 (OJ 2018, L.27, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 July 2018 — Synergy Hellas v Commission

(Case T-244/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Grant agreement concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) - Recovery of the sums paid - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

(2018/C 301/51)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: d.d. Synergy Hellas Anonymi Empokiri Etaireia Parochis Ypiresion Pliroforikis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: K. Damis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Katsimerou and A. Kyratsou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2018) 1115 final of 19 February 2018 relating the recovery from the applicant of the sum of EUR 76 282,08 plus default interest.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 30 November 2018 — Front Polisario v Council

(Case T-275/18) (1)

((Action for annulment - Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part - Act concluding the agreement - Lack of applicability of the agreement to the territory of Western Sahara - Lack of standing to bring proceedings - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 44/92)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) (represented by: G. Devers, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Council Decision (EU) 2018/146 of 22 January 2018 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part (OJ 2018 L 26, p. 4).

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic or the European Commission.

3. The Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia-el-Hamra et du Rio de Oro (Front Polisario) shall pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

4. The Front Polisario, the Council, the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain and the French Republic shall each bear their own costs relating to their applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2018 — HMV (Brands) v EUIPO — Our Price Records (OUR PRICE)

(Case T-129/18) (1)

(2018/C 427/139)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Sonova Holding v EUIPO (HEAR THE WORLD)

(Case T-70/18) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark HEAR THE WORLD - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 65/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sonova Holding AG (Stäfa, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Pansch and A. Sabellek, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, D. Hanf and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2017 (Case R 1645/2017-5) concerning an application for registration of the word sign HEAR THE WORLD as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Sonova Holding AG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 28 November 2018 — ZU v Commission

(Case T-671/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Civil service - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency))

(2019/C 54/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and R. Striani, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking a suspension of the operation of the Decision of the Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security of the European Commission of 12 October 2018 (Ares(2018)5241886 — 12/10/2018) relating to the transfer of the applicant, and of the Decision of the Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security of the European Commission of 29 October 2018 (Ares(2018)5529220 — 29/10/2018) relating to his return to headquarters.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.