ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 113/46

Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE)

(Case T-414/09) (1)

(Community trade marks - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)

2010/C 113/75

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: C. Milbradt, subsequently by C. Milbradt and H. Van Volxem, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: JLO Holding Company LLC (Santa Monica, United States) (represented by: A. Klett, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 July 2009 (Case R 609/2008-1) relating to an application for revocation involving Henkel AG & Co. KGaA and JLO Holding Company, LLC.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The parties shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 37/49

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2009 — Complejo Agrícola v Commission

(Case T-174/09) (1)

2010/C 37/76

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 234/54

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2010 — Centraal bureau voor de statistiek v Commission

(Case T-361/09) (1)

()

2010/C 234/97

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 148/51

Order of the General Court of 12 April 2010 — Aecops v Commission

(Case T-257/09) (1)

2010/C 148/89

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 30/57

Order of the General Court of 29 November 2010 — Eurotel v OHIM — DVB Project (DVB)

(Case T-21/09) (1)

()

2011/C 30/101

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Schemaventotto v Commission

(Case T-58/09) (1)

(Action for annulment - Concentrations - Abandonment of an intended concentration - Decision to close the procedure opened under Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)

(2010/C 288/78)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Schemaventotto SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. Scassellati Sforzolini, G. Rizza and M. Piergiovanni, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and É. Gippini Fournier, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Abertis Infraestructuras, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: M. Roca Junyent and P. Callol García, lawyers)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision or decisions allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 13 August 2008 concerning the proceeding opened under Article 21(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1) in relation to the concentration between the intervener and Autostrade SpA (Case COMP/M.4388 Abertis v Autostrade)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Schemaventotto SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. Abertis Infraestructuras, SA shall bear its own costs..

(1) OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 211/24

Order of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Government of Gibraltar v Commission

(Case T-176/09) (1)

(Action for annulment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Decision 2009/95/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region - Inclusion in the site of Community importance called ‘Estrecho oriental’ of an area of the territorial waters of Gibraltar and of an area of the high seas - Partial annulment - Non-severability - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 211/52

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Government of Gibraltar (represented by: D. Vaughan and M. Llamas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Boelaert and D. Recchia, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by E. Jenkinson and S. Ossowski, Agents, and by D. Wyatt QC and M. Wood, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by N. Díaz Abad and M. Muñoz Pérez, Agents

Re:

APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2009/95/EC of 12 December 2008 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a second updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2009 L 43, p. 393), to the extent that it extends the site called ‘Estrecho oriental’ (ES6120032) to the territorial waters of Gibraltar (both within and outside Site UKGIB0002) and to an area of the high seas

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Government of Gibraltar shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 63/26

Order of the General Court of 12 January 2011 — Terezakis v Commission

(Case T-411/09) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Partial refusal of access - Contested act replaced in the course of the proceedings - Refusal to amend the claims - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 63/51

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ioannis Terezakis (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially B. Lombart, then P. Synoikis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and C. ten Dam, Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 3 August 2009 refusing the applicant access to some parts of, and the annexes to, certain letters exchanged between the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and the Greek Ministry of Finance regarding tax irregularities in connection with the construction of Spata airport at Athens (Greece)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The parties shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/32

Order of the General Court of 3 October 2011 — Meridiana and Meridiana fly v Commission

(Case T-128/09) (1)

(State aid - Action for annulment - Applicants’ failure to act - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 347/53

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Meridiana SpA (Olbia, Italy) and Meridiana fly SpA, formerly Eurofly SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: N. Green QC, K. Bacon, Barrister, C. Osti and A. Prastaro, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and E. Righini, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Italian Republic (represented by G. Palmieri and P. Gentili, lawyers) and Alitalia — Compagnia Aerea Italiana SpA (Fiumicino, Italy) (represented by G.M. Roberti, G. Bellitti and I. Perego, lawyers)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6745 final of 12 November 2008 (State Aid No 510/2008 — Italy — Sale of assets of Alitalia)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Meridiana SpA and Meridiana fly SpA shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and by Alitalia — Compagnia Aerea Italiana SpA.

3. The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/17

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Tecnoprocess v Commission and EU Delegation to the Kingdom of Morocco

(Case T-264/09) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Invitation to act - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Causal link - Loss - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2011/C 282/30

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Technoprocess Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Majoli, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and L. Prete, Agents); and EU Delegation to the Kingdom of Morocco

Re:

APPLICATION firstly, for a declaration that the European Commission and the EU Delegation to the Kingdom of Morocco have failed to act and secondly, for damages to compensate for the loss allegedly suffered as a result of, inter alia, that failure to act.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as in part inadmissible and in part manifestly without foundation in law.

2. Technoprocess Srl is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 151/28

Order of the General Court of 26 March 2012 — Cañas v Commission

(Case T-508/09) (1)

(Competition - Anti-doping rules - Decision rejecting a complaint - Discontinuance of a professional activity - Disappearance of the interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 151/45

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Guillermo Cañas (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented initially by F. Laboulfie and C. Aguet, then by Y. Bonnard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Van Nuffel and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents, and J. Derenne, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: World Anti-Doping Agency (Lausanne, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Berrisch, lawyer, D. Cooper, Soliciitor, and N. Chesaites, Barrister); and ATP Tour, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: B. van de Walle de Ghelcke and J. Marchandise, lawyers)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 7809 of 12 October 2009 in Case COMP/39471 rejecting a complaint, for insufficient Community interest, concerning an infringement of Articles 81 EC and 82 EC allegedly committed by the World Anti-Doping Agency, by ATP Tour, Inc. and by the International Council of Arbitration for Sport (ICAS).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Guillermo Cañas is ordered to pay his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The World Anti-Doping Agency and ATP Tour, Inc. are ordered to pay their own costs.

4. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by European Elite Athletes Association.

(1) OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/22

Order of the General Court of 26 January 2012 — Mojo Concerts and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie v Commission

(Case T-90/09) (1)

(State aid - Action for annulment - Investment of the Gemeente Rotterdam in the Ahoy’ complex - Decision finding that there was no State aid - Applicants not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 89/36

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Mojo Concerts BV (Delft, Netherlands) and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie BV (Delft, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Beeston, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and K. Gross, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Noort, C. Wissels, M. de Grave, Y. de Vries and J. Langer, agents); Gemeente Rotterdam (Netherlands) (represented by: J. Feenstra and J. Fanoy, lawyers); and Ahoy’ Rotterdam NV (Rotterdam) (represented initially by M. van der Woude and E. Offers, and subsequently by M. Maas-Cooymans, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6018 final of 21 October 2008 on the investment made by the Gemeente Rotterdam in the Ahoy’ complex (State aid C 4/2008 (ex N 97/2007, ex CP 91/2007)).

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

2. Orders Mojo Concerts BV and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie BV to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, the Gemeente Rotterdam and Ahoy’ Rotterdam NV;

3. Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/41

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — CNIEL v Commission

(Case T-293/09) (1)

((State aid - Framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented - Financing by voluntary levies made compulsory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 175/56

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Centre national interprofessionnel de l’économie laitière (CNIEL) (Paris, France) (represented initially by: A. Cabanes and V. Kostrzewski-Pugnat, subsequently by: A. Cabanes, A.-C. Jeux and L. Sersiron, and finally by: A. Cabanes, L. Sersiron and M. Spy, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, subsequently by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, and finally by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008 concerning State aid No 561/2008, on the framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 141/26

Order of the General Court of 18 March 2013 — Mitteldeutsche Flughafen and Flughafen Dresden v Commission

(Case T-217/09) (1)

2013/C 141/48

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 April 2010 — Parliament v U

(Case T-103/10 P (R)) (1)

(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Dismissal decision - Order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union in an application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

(2010/C 161/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and K. Zejdovà, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: U (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal against the Order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 18 December 2009 in Case F-92/09 R U v Parliament, not yet reported in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The Order of the President the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 18 December 2009 in Case F-92/09 R U v Parliament, not yet reported in the ECR, is set aside;

2. The application for interim measures brought by U is dismissed;

3. Costs are reserved.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/31

Order of the President of the General Court of 31 August 2010 — Babcock Noell v The European joint undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy

(Case T-299/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public contracts - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tender - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case - Urgency - Balance of interests)

2010/C 301/53

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Babcock Noell GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Werner and C. Elbrecht, lawyers)

Defendant: The European joint undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (represented by: A. Verpont, Agent, assisted by C. Kennedy-Loest, K. Wilson and C. Thomas, Solicitors, and N. Pourbaix, lawyer)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of decisions taken by the defendant, in the context of a tendering procedure, to reject the applicant’s tenders and to award to another tenderer Lot D of the contract for the supply of ITER toroidal field coils winding packs

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 234/38

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 June 2010 — Regione Puglia v Commission

(Cases T-84/10 R and T-223/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Decision to reduce Community financial assistance - Debit note - Application to suspend the operation of a measure - No urgency)

2010/C 234/68

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Regione Puglia (represented by: F. Brunelli and A. Aloia, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Cattabriga and A. Steiblytè, Agents)

Re:

Action to suspend the operation, first, of Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, concerning the cancellation of part of the contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), allocated to Italy for the operational programme POR Puglia, within Objective 1 (2000-2006) and, second, of the payment order contained in the debit note of 26 February 2010 issued following that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. Cases T-84/10 R and T-223/10 R are joined for the purposes of this order.

2. The applications for interim measures are dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 72/18

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 January 2011 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission

(Case T-370/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Decision of the Commission to impose a fine - Bank guarantee - Application for suspension of application - Financial harm - Lack of exceptional circumstances - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 72/30

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Rubinetterie Teorema SpA (Flero, Italy) (represented by: R. Cavani, M. di Muro and P. Preda, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Antoniadis, F. Castillo de la Torre and L. Malferrari, agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of application of Commission Decision C(2010) 3 4185 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.092 — Bathroom fittings and fixtures).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for suspension of application is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 30/57

Order of the General Court of 18 November 2010 — Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori v Commission

(Case T-193/10) (1)

()

2011/C 30/106

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 152/21

Order of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission

(Case T-36/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the LIEN 97-2011 contract - Response to an initial request - Period allowed for bringing proceedings - Manifestly inadmissible - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Explicit decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 152/38

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV (Rosbach, Germany) (represented by: initially, H. Kaltenecker, subsequently R. Bôhm, and lastly H. Kaltenecker, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and T. Scharf, agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: initally B. Weis Fogh and V. Pasternak Jørgensen and, subsequently, V. Pasternak Jørgensen, C. Yang and S. Juul Jørgensen, agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the Commission’s decisions of 9 October 2009 and 1 December 2009 refusing Internationaler Hilfsfonds full access to the file relating to the LIEN 97-2011 contract.

Operative part of the order

1. In so far as it is directed against the Commission’s decision of 9 October 2009, the action for annulment is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the heads of claim in the action brought by Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV for annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission rejecting its request of 15 October 2009 for access to documents relating to the LIEN 97-2011 contract.

3. Internationaler Hilfsfonds shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission relating to the heads of claim for annulment, in so far as they are directed against the Commission’s decision of 9 October 2009.

4. The Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Internationaler Hilfsfonds relating to the heads of claim for annulment, in so far as they are directed against the Commission’s decision of 1 December 2009.

5. The Kingdom of Denmark shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 120/12

Order of the President of the General Court of 9 March 2011 — Castiglioni v Commission

(Case T-591/10 R)

(Interim proceedings - Public contracts - Public procurement procedure - Rejection of a bid - Application for stay of execution - Failure to have regard to the formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 120/30

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Castiglioni Srl (Busto Arsizio, Italy) (represented by: G. Turri, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and N. Bambara, acting as Agents, and by D. Gullo, lawyer)

Re:

Application for interim measures made in the tendering procedure concerning a multiple framework agreement for works to construct, restructure and maintain buildings and infrastructure at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre’s Ispra (Italy) site.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 238/17

Order of the General Court of 21 June 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-12/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Reimbursement of expenses - Note of the Commission informing the applicant of its intention to make a deduction from his invalidity allowance - Lack of any measure adversely affecting the appellant - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 238/28

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 October 2009 in Case F-94/08 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the annulment of that order.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance.

(1) OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.