ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Intertranslations (Intertransleïsions) Metafraseis v Parliament

(Case T-20/20 R)

(Interim measures - Public service contracts - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2020/C 175/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Intertranslations (Intertransleïsions) Metafraseis AE (Kallithea, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Toliušis and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures, in the first place, suspending the operation of the decisions of the Parliament of 4 December 2019 which rank the applicant’s tender in the second place for the award of the cascade contract relating to Lot No 5 of the contract for translation services into English in Call for tenders TRA/EU19/2019 and award the first contract arising from that call for tenders to another tenderer, in the second place, suspending the contract concluded with that other tenderer and, in the third place, ordering the Parliament to communicate to the applicant the missing sections of the Evaluation Committee’s statement of reasons.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 6 October 2020 — Sharpston v Council and Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States

(Case T-180/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Declaration by the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on the consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union for the Advocates General of the Court of Justice - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 433/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Eleanor Sharpston (Schoenfels, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Forwood and J. Robb, Barristers, and H. Mercer QC)

Defendants: Council of the European Union and Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and A. Sikora-Kalėda, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFUE seeking partial annulment of the Declaration by the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on the consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union for the Advocates General of the Court of Justice of the European Union, of 29 January 2020.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Eleanor Sharpston shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 18 August 2020 — Net Technologies Finland v REA

(Case T-358/20 R)

(Interim measures - Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Reimbursement of sums paid - Debit notes - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

(2020/C 371/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Net Technologies Finland Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: S. Pappas and N. Kyriazopoulou, lawyers)

Defendant: Research Executive Agency (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou and V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and by M. Le Berre, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the suspension of operation of two debit notes issued by the REA on 7 May 2020 requiring payment by the applicant of the sum of EUR 188 477,27 no later than 22 June 2020.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 18 June 2020, Net Technologies Finland v REA (T-358/20 R) is cancelled.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 December 2020 — Genekam Biotechnology v Commission

(Case T-579/20 R)

(Application for interim measures - Grant agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Recovery of the sums paid - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency)

(2021/C 53/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Genekam Biotechnology AG (Duisburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Hertwig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà, A Katsimerou and R. Pethke, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 299 TFEU to suspend the enforcement of Commission Decision C(2020) 5548 final of 7 August 2020 establishing a pecuniary obligation and forming an enforceable decision against the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 October 2020 — CH and CN v Parliament

(Case T-490/20) (1)

(2021/C 19/81)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 January 2021 — MS v Commission

(Case T-602/20) (1)

(2021/C 98/42)

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 404, 30.11.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2020 — Facegym Ltd v EUIPO (FACEGYM)

(Case T-289/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark FACEGYM - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 62/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Facegym Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2020 (Case R 70/2020-5), relating to an application for registration of the word sign FACEGYM as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Facegym Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 March 2021 — Evropská vodní doprava-sped. and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-576/20) (1)

(2021/C 206/49)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 February 2021 — Ultrasun v EUIPO (ULTRASUN)

(Case T-437/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark ULTRASUN - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 163/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Ultrasun AG (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2020 (Case R 1453/2019-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign ULTRASUN as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ultrasun AG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 May 2021 — Poupart v Commission

(Case T-376/20) (1)

(2021/C 278/95)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission

(Case T-142/20) (1)

(2021/C 252/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Order of the General Court of 8 June 2021 — Silver and Others v Council

(Case T-252/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Area of freedom, security and justice - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom - Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on withdrawal - United Kingdom nationals - Loss of EU citizenship - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 310/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Joshua Silver (Bicester, United Kingdom) and the six other applicants whose names are set out in the annex (represented by: P. Tridimas, Barrister, D. Harrison and A. von Westernhagen, Solicitors)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and J. Ciantar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking partial annulment of Council Decision (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Commission, British in Europe, Plaid Cymru — The Party of Wales, European Democracy Lab, ECIT and European Alternatives Ltd.

3. Mr Joshua Silver and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.

4. Mr Silver and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex, the Council, the Commission, British in Europe, Plaid Cymru — The Party of Wales, European Democracy Lab, ECIT and European Alternatives Ltd shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT3)

(Case T-421/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GT3 - Earlier EU figurative mark GT - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Relevant public - Level of attention - Action manifestly well founded)

(2021/C 310/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1609/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe and Huawei Technologies.

Operative part of the order

1. The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1609/2019-4) is annulled.

2. EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd.

(1) OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 September 2021 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission

(Case T-611/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Registration of imports - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 471/72)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (Molteno, Italy) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, G. Pandey, V. Villante and M. Pirovano, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1215 of 21 August 2020 making imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China subject to registration (OJ 2020 L 275, p. 16), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Airoldi Metalli SpA shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 414, 30.11.2020.
Order of the General Court of 28 July 2021 — NG and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-646/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Road transport - Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 - Driver’s rest periods - Impossibility of taking certain rest periods in the vehicle - Return to the employer’s operational centre or to the place of residence for certain rest periods - Professional association - Standing to bring proceedings - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 412/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: NG and 17 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: R. Martens, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: R. van de Westelaken and A. Tamás, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Norberg, L. Vétillard and S. Emmerechts, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Article 1(6)(c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs (OJ 2020 L 249, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. NG and the other parties whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 November 2021 — Grupa Azoty and Others v Commission

(Case T-726/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021 - Eligible sectors - Exclusion of the fertiliser manufacturing sector - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 73/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Grupa Azoty S.A. (Tarnów, Poland), Azomureș S.A. (Târgu Mureş, Romania), Lipasmata Kavalas LTD Ypokatastima Allodapis (Palaio Fáliro, Greece) (represented by: D. Haverbeke, L. Ruessmann and P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and G. Braga da Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment in part of the Communication from the Commission of 25 September 2020 entitled ‘Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021’ (OJ 2020 C 317, p. 5).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. Grupa Azoty S.A., Azomureș S.A. and Lipasmata Kavalas LTD Ypokatastima Allodapis shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear the costs relating to its application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 72, 1.3.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2021 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendant (jewellery))

(Case T-329/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a pendant (jewellery) - Maintenance of the Community design in an amended form - Article 25(6) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 513/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: 4B Company Srl (Montegiorgio, Italy) (represented by: G. Brogi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Scardocchia and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Deenz Holding Ltd (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: N. Alberti, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2020 (Case R 2449/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between 4B Company and Deenz Holding.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. 4B Company Srl shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Kirimova v EUIPO

(Case T-727/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 198/69)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nigar Kirimova (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Parassina and A. García López, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Predonzani and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Executive Director of EUIPO of 30 September 2020 rejecting the applicant’s request for an exemption from the requirement to be a national of one of the Member States of the European Economic Area (EEA) upon which inclusion on the list of professional representatives authorised by that office depends.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Ms Nigar Kirimova is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 163, 3.5.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Europull (GREEN COAST)

(Case T-361/20) (1)

(2022/C 119/82)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.
Order of the President of the General Court of 26 May 2021 — Darment v Commission

(Case T-92/21 R)

(Application for interim relief - Environment - Fluorinated greenhouse gases - Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 - Placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market - Decision imposing a penalty on an undertaking that exceeded the quota allocated to it - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 278/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Darment Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: C. Ginter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 279 TFEU seeking, first, an order requiring the Commission to cease applying to the applicant, as regards the year 2021 and subsequent allocation periods, a penalty under Article 25(2) of Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 (OJ 2014 L 150, p. 195), and, secondly, an order requiring the Commission to allocate to the applicant a quota for the bulk import of hydrofluorocarbons for the 2021 allocation period and subsequent allocation periods.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 October 2021 — Apex Brands v EUIPO — Sartorius Werkzeuge (SATA)

(Case T-430/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 2/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Apex Brands, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: S. Fröhlich, M. Hartmann and H. Lerchl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Sartorius Werkzeuge GmbH & Co. KG (Ratingen, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 May 2021 (Case R 2322/2020-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sartorius Werkzeuge and Apex Brands.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Apex Brands, Inc. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 357, 6.9.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 August 2021 — PJ v EIT

(Case T-12/21) (1)

(2021/C 431/68)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — IL and Others v Parliament

(Case T-724/21 R)

(Application for interim measures - Civil Service - Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2022/C 95/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: IL and 81 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru and L. Panepinto, lawyers

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha, S. Bukšek Tomac and L. Darie, acting as Agents

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the suspension of operation of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 27 October 2021 on the exceptional health and safety rules governing access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 15 November 2021, IL and Others v Parliament (T-724/21 R) is set aside.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 November 2021 — VP v Cedefop

(Case T-534/21 R)

(Interim relief - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Application for interim measures - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 37/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (represented by: T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU for, first, suspension of the application of the act of Cedefop’s Executive Board to support the conclusion of its Executive Director that he re-establish the post of internal legal adviser and to initiate a selection procedure and for, second, an order to Cedefop that it keep vacant a temporary agent post at grade AD suitable for reinstating the applicant in the post of legal adviser.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.