ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/47

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-58/13) (1)

((Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings - Failure to designate a new representative - Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 146/63)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A., lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for compensation for the harm suffered as a result of the infringement alleged of the applicant’s right to confidentiality caused by the defendant’s sending a letter concerning him to a lawyer who did not represent him.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-58/13 Marcuccio v Commission.

2. Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 352, 30.11.2013, p. 26.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 421/57

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 September 2014 — Moriarty v Parliament

(Case F-98/13) (1)

((Civil service - Promotion - 2012 promotion procedure - Non-inclusion in the list of promoted officials - Application manifestly lacking any legal basis))

2014/C 421/81

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Rainer Moriarty (Colmar-Berg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Salerno and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Despotopoulou and E. Taneva, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision adopting the list of officials promoted in respect of the 2012 promotion procedure, in so far as, first, it does not include the applicant’s name among the officials of Grade AST 6, non-attested, promoted to Grade AST 7 and, secondly, it contains the name of another official.

Operative part of the order

1. Mr Moriarty’s action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any legal basis.

2. Mr Moriarty is to bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 367, 14.12.2013, p. 40.
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 1 August 2016 — Mario Animali and Others v European Commission

(Case F-23/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Decision recognising years of pensionable service applying the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 364/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Mario Animali and Others (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by: D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers, and subsequently by: D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, and finally by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: C. Ehrbar and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and finally by: G. Gattinara, acting as Agent)

Re:

Annulment of the decision transmitting the definitive calculation of the annuities for the transfer of the applicants’ pension rights to the European Union pension scheme under the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 156, 1.6.2013, p. 55.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/49

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 February 2016 — McArdle v Commission

(Case F-25/13) (1)

(2016/C 136/70)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 156, 1/6/2013, p. 55.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 421/65

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 May 2014 — Deweerdt and Lebrun v Court of Auditors

(Case F-2/14) (1)

2014/C 421/99

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 61, 1.3.2014, p. 22.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 48/98

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — López Cabeza v Commission

(Case F-76/14) (1)

((Civil Service - Open competition - Competition notice EPSO/AD/248/13 - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Insufficient mark in the assessment centre tests - Action for annulment - Breach of the competition notice - Illegality of a test))

(2016/C 048/113)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Alfonso López Cabeza (Valladolid, Spain) (represented by: G. Suárez de Castro and M. Orman, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and G. Gattinara)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list for Competition EPSO/AD/248/13.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and is ordered to pay all the costs incurred by Mr López Cabeza.

(1) OJ C 388, 3.11.2014, p. 30.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 262/44

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 June 2015 — Chezzi v Commission

(Case F-62/14) (1)

(2015/C 262/60)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 361, 13.10.2014, p. 31.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 20 July 2016 — Belis v Commission

(Case F-108/14) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Proposal concerning additional pensionable years - Act not having an adverse effect - Inadmissibility of the action - Application for a decision not going to the merits of the case - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 364/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Claudio Belis (Ispra, Italy) (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, and subsequently by G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision crediting the applicant’s pension rights in relation to the transfer of those rights to the European Union pension scheme, pursuant to the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Claudio Belis shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 26, 26/1/2015, p. 46.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 May 2016 — Leon-Gonzalez and Vander Velde v Commission

(Case F-47/14) (1)

(2016/C 222/73)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 212, 7/7/2014, p. 47.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/54

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2015 — De Esteban Alonso v Commission

(Case F-35/15) (1)

((Civil service - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Criminal proceedings before a national court - Joinder of Commission in bringing a civil action - Action dismissed as manifestly unfounded))

(2015/C 279/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Fernando De Esteban Alonso (Saint-Martin-de-Seignanx, France) (represented by: C. Huglo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to take further action on the request for assistance made by the applicant where he was under investigation for misappropriation of funds accruing to the Community budget.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2. Mr De Esteban Alonso is to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 146, 4/5/2015, p. 52.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/50

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 March 2016 — FJ v Parliament

(Case F-38/15) (1)

(2016/C 136/73)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 178, 1/6/2015, p. 26.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 48/102

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 December 2015 — Diamantopoulos v EEAS

(Case F-30/15) (1)

(2016/C 048/119)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 146, 4/5/2015, p. 50.
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 July 2016 — Possanzini v Frontex

(Case F-68/15) (1)

((Civil service - Frontex staff - Temporary staff - Non-renewal of contract based on the applicant’s appraisal report relating to 2009 - Proof of notification of the report - Absence - Annulment by the Tribunal - Compliance with the judgment - Notification of the appraisal report - Delay in the production and communication of the report))

(2016/C 364/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Daniele Possanzini (Pisa, Italy) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (represented by: H. Caniard and V. Peres de Almeida, acting as Agents, D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Subject matter of the case

Application for annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report relating to 2009 and the claim for damages for the non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2) Daniele Possanzini is to bear his own cost and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 245, 27.7.2015, p. 49.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 232/37

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 May 2016 — FR v EASA

(Case F-51/15) (1)

(2016/C 232/47)

Language of the case: English

The Judge ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 8/6/2015, p. 37.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/63

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2014 — Mogyi v OHIM (Just crunch it...)

(Case T-9/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 315/106

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Mogyi Kft (Csávoly, Hungary) (represented by: Zs. J. Klauber, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Sipos and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 September 2013 (Case R 1922/2012-1) concerning an application for registration of the figurative mark Just crunch it... as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The defendant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the applicant.

(1) OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/26

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 September 2014 — Erbslöh v Commission

(Case T-296/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - National support for the generation of renewable electricity - Commission decision to open the State aid formal investigation procedure - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case))

(2014/C 431/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Erbslöh AG (Velbert, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz and B. Wißmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened the State aid formal investigation procedure concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 361/9

Order of the General Court of 1 August 2014 — Energy Brands v OHIM — Smart Wines (SMARTWATER)

(Case T-81/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 361/10

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Energy Brands, Inc. (Atlanta, United States) (represented by: D. Stone and R. Allos, Solicitors)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Smart Wines GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: I. Schwarz, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2013 (case R 903/2013-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Energy Brands, Inc. and Smart Wines GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant, the defendant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/21

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — CR v Parliament and Council

(Case T-342/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Recovery of overpayments - Plea of illegality raised in relation to paragraph 2 of Article 85 of the Staff Regulations - Legal certainty - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons - Appeal manifestly unfounded))

(2015/C 056/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: CR (Malling, France) (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: V. Montebello-Demogeot and E. Taneva, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented initially by M. Bauer and A. Bisch, and subsequently by M. Bauer and E. Rebasti, acting as agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 12 March 2014 in CR v Parliament (F-128/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:38), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr CR shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Parliament in the present proceedings.

3. The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/33

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2014 — Gappol Marzena Porczyńska v OHIM — Gap (ITM) (GAPPol)

(Case T-125/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 026/42)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: J. Gwiazdowska, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Gap (ITM), Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Siciarek, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 December 2014 (Case R 686/2013-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Gap (ITM), Inc. and PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska and Gap (ITM), Inc.

(1) OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 138/67

Order of the General Court of 4 March 2015 — Messi Cuccittini v OHIM — Pires Freitas Campos (LEO)

(Case T-459/14) (1)

(2015/C 138/87)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 329, 22.9.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/44

Order of the General Court of 27 January 2015 — Hamas v Council

(Case T-702/14) (1)

(2015/C 089/53)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 395, 10.11.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 205/33

Order of the General Court of 27 April 2015 —Vierling v OHIM — IP Leanware (BRAINCUBE)

(Case T-581/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 205/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Yvonne Vierling (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and D. Kipping, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: IP Leanware (Issoire, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 April 2014 (Case R 1486/2013-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Yvonne Vierling and IP Leanware.

Operative part of the order

1) There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2) Ms Yvonne Vierling shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by OHIM.

(1) OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/38

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products and Others v Commission

(Case T-263/14) (1)

(2015/C 155/47)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 245/27

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Michelin Reifenwerke v Commission

(Case T-301/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 245/32)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Michelin Reifenwerke AG & Co. KGaA (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, M. Ringel, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. Michelin Reifenwerke AG & Co. KGaA shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/13

Order of the General Court of 18 May 2015 — Ackermann Saatzucht and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-559/14) (1)

((‘Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 - Compliance measures for users from the Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization in the Union - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility’))

(2015/C 228/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ackermann Saatzucht (Irlbach, Germany) and the other applicants listed in the annex to the order (represented by: P. de Jong, P. Vlaemminck and B. Van Vooren, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by L. Visaggio, J. Rodrigues and R. Van de Westelaken, acting as Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and M. Simm, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization in the Union (OJ 2014 L 150, p. 59).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to rule on the application of the European Seed Association (ESA) for leave to intervene.

3. Ackermann Saatzucht GmbH & Co. KG and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex are to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 294/63

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Flachglas Torgau and Others v Commission

(Case T-276/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/77)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Flachglas Torgau GmbH (Torgau, Germany); Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany); and Saint-Gobain Oberland AG (Bad Wurzach, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and H. Janssen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. Flachglas Torgau GmbH, Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG and Saint-Gobain Oberland AG shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
Case T-311/14: Order of the General Court of 25 June 2015 — Seca Benelux and Others v Parliament

Order of the General Court of 25 June 2015 — Seca Benelux and Others v Parliament

(Case T-311/14) ( 1 )

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 311/61

Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — PSL v OHIM — Consortium Ménager Parisien (Representation of a watch)

(Case T-212/14) (1)

(2015/C 311/68)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.