Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:  
TofuTown.com GmbH (Wiesbaum, Germany) (represented by: 
B. Krause and F. Cordt, lawyers)  
Re: 
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of 
Appeal of OHIM of 7 January 2010 (Case R 63/2009-4) 
concerning opposition proceedings between Meica Ammer ­
ländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co KG 
and TofuTown.com GmbH.  
Operative part of the judgment:  
The Court:  
1. Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office 
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and 
Designs) (OHIM) of 7 January 2010 (Case R 63/2009-4);  
2. Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by 
Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH 
& Co KG;  
3. Orders TofuTown.com GmbH to bear its own costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.  
Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — 
ara v OHIM — Allrounder (A with two rectangular motifs)  
(Case T-174/10)  ( 1 ) 
(Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Inter ­
national registration covering the European Community — 
Figurative mark A with two triangular motifs — Earlier 
national word mark A — Relative ground for refusal — No 
likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 
No 207/2009)  
(2011/C 319/36)  
Language of the case: French  
Parties  
Applicant:  ara AG (Langenfeld, Germany) (represented initially by 
M. Gial, then by M. Gial and H. Pernez, lawyers)  
Defendant:  Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market 
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard- 
Monguiral, agent)  
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, 
intervener before the General Court:  Allrounder SARL (Sarrebourg, 
France) (represented by: N. Boespflug, lawyer)  
Re: 
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal 
of OHIM of 26 January 2010 (Case R 481/2009-1) concerning 
opposition proceedings between ara AG and Allrounder SARL.  
Operative part of the judgment  
The Court:  
1. Dismisses the action;  2. Orders ara AG to pay the costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.  
Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2011 — 
Couture Tech v OHIM (Representation of the Soviet coat 
of arms)  
(Case T-232/10)  ( 1 ) 
(Community trade mark — Application for a Community 
figurative mark representing the Soviet coat of arms — 
Absolute ground for refusal — Whether contrary to public 
policy or accepted principles of morality — Article 7(1)(f) of 
Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)  
(2011/C 319/37)  
Language of the case: English  
Parties  
Applicant:  Couture Tech Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) 
(represented by: B. Whyatt, Barrister)  
Defendant:  Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market 
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)  
Re: 
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of 
Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2010 (Case R 1509/2008-2) 
concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign 
representing the Soviet coat of arms as a Community trade 
mark.  
Operative part of the judgment  
The Court:  
1. Dismisses the action;  
2. Orders Couture Tech Ltd to pay the costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.  
Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — 
Nike International v OHIM (DYNAMIC SUPPORT)  
(Case T-512/10)  ( 1 ) 
(Community trade mark — Application for Community word 
mark DYNAMIC SUPPORT — Absolute ground for refusal 
— Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) 
No 207/2009)  
(2011/C 319/38)  
Language of the case: English  
Parties  
Applicant:  Nike International Ltd (Beaverton, Oregon, United 
States of America) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)  
Defendant:  Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market 
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)EN C 319/18 Official Journal of the European Union 29.10.2011
Re: 
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of 
Appeal of OHIM of 25 August 2010 (case R 640/2010-4), 
concerning an application for registration of the word sign 
DYNAMIC SUPPORT as a Community trade mark  
Operative part of the judgment  
The Court:  
1. Dismisses the action;  
2. Orders Nike International Ltd to pay the costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.  
Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2011 — 
Kadio Morokro v Council  
(Case T-316/11)  ( 1 ) 
(Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures 
taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire — Freezing of 
funds — Obligation to state reasons)  
(2011/C 319/39)  
Language of the case: French  
Parties  
Applicant:  Mathieu Kadio Morokro (Cocody, Ivory Coast) (repre ­
sented by: S. Le Damany, lawyer)  
Defendant:  Council of the European Union (represented by: B. 
Driessen and G. Étienne, Agents)  
Re: 
Application for annulment, first, of Council Decision 
2011/221/CFSP of 6 April 2011 amending Decision 
2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte 
d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 20), and, second, Council Regulation 
(EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) 
No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures 
directed against certain persons and entities in view of the 
situation in Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 10), in so far as 
they concern the applicant.  
Operative part of the judgment  
The Court:  
1. Annuls Council Decision 2011/221/CFSP of 6 April 2011 
amending Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive 
measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 20), and, 
second, Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 
2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing 
certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain 
persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire, in 
so far as they concern Mr Mathieu Kadio Morokro.  2. Maintains the effects of Decision 2011/221 as far as concerns 
Mr Kadio Morokro until the annulment of Regulation No 
330/2011 takes effect.  
3. Orders the Council of the European Union to pay, in addition to 
its own costs, the costs incurred by Mr Kadio Morokro.  
( 1 ) OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.  
Order of the General Court of 1 September 2011 — 
Maftah v Commission  
(Case T-101/09)  ( 1 ) 
(Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing 
proceedings — Out of time — No force majeure — No 
excusable error — Inadmissibility)  
(2011/C 319/40)  
Language of the case: English  
Parties  
Applicant:  Elmabruk Maftah (South Harrow, Middlesex, United 
Kingdom) (represented by: E. Grieves, Barrister, and A. 
McMurdie, Solicitor)  
Defendant:  European Commission (represented by: E. Paasivirta 
and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)  
Intervening party on behalf of the defendant:  Council of the 
European Union, represented by R. Szostak, G. Étienne, M.-M. 
Josephides and E. Finnegan, Agents  
Re: 
APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) 
No 1330/2008 of 22 December 2008 amending for the 103rd 
time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain 
specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and 
entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network 
and the Taliban (OJ 2008 L 345, p. 60), in so far as it concerns 
the applicant.  
Operative part of the order  
1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible;  
2. Mr Elmabruk Maftah shall bear his own costs and pay the costs 
of the European Commission;  
3. The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.EN 29.10.2011 Official Journal of the European Union C 319/19