ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2021 — MKB Multifunds v Commission

(Case T-277/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Private equity fund - Complaint - Measures allegedly constituting State aid related to Dutch Venture Initiative - Decision adopted at the end of the preliminary procedure for reviewing aid - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Status as an interested party - Safeguarding of procedural rights - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 452/48)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: MKB Multifunds BV (Zierikzee, Netherlands) (represented by: J. van de Hel and R. Rampersad, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman and C. Schillemans, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking, in essence, annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 1109 final of 27 February 2020 concerning State aid SA.55704 (2019/FC) — the Netherlands, relating to alleged State aid granted to Dutch Venture Initiative.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. MKB Multifunds BV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Boquoi Handels v EUIPO (Representation of an ice crystal on a blue circular background)

(Case T-734/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for registration of a figurative sign representing an ice crystal on a blue circular background - Partial rejection of the application - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 109/32)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Boquoi Handels OHG (Grünwald, Germany) (represented by: S. Lorenz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Graul and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2020 (Case R 522/2020-2), concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing an ice crystal on a blue circular background as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Boquoi Handels OHG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.
Order of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — KS and KD v Council and Others

(Case T-771/20) (1)

(Action for damages - Common foreign and security policy - Eulex Kosovo mission - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)

(2022/C 24/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: KS, KD (represented by: F. Randolph QC and J. Stojsavljevic-Savic, Solicitor)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro, P. Mahnič and K. Kouri, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: Y. Marinova and J. Roberti di Sarsina, acting as Agents), European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt, S. Rodríguez Sánchez-Tabernero and E. Orgován, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of various acts and omissions by the Council, the Commission and the EEAS in the implementation of Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO (OJ 2008 L 42, p. 92), and, in particular, during the investigations that were carried out, during that mission, into the disappearance and killing of the applicants’ family members in 1999 in Pristina (Kosovo).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed since the Court manifestly lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine it.

2. KS and KD shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.

3. The European External Action Service (EEAS) shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 October 2022 — Interfloat and GMB v Commission

(Case T-530/20) (1)

(2022/C 451/31)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 February 2022 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Ou (-Vpro)

(Case T-491/20) (1)

(2022/C 148/65)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 313, 21.9.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 July 2021– PZ v Commission.

(Case T-49/21) (1)

(2021/C 382/50)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) C 128, 12.4.2021.
Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2021 — PJ v EIT

(Case T-12/21 R)

(Application for interim relief - Civil service - Measures for the organisation of work during the health crisis - Prohibition of teleworking outside the country of employment - Application for an exemption - Refusal decision - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Application for interim measures - Urgency - Prima facie case - Balancing of interests)

(2021/C 242/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PJ (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (represented by: P. Juanes Burgos, acting as Agent, and by A. Duron, lawyer)

Re:

APPLICATION under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for (i) the suspension of operation of the decision of the EIT of 17 December 2020 to refuse the applicant’s request to telework from her place of origin and (ii) an order that EIT should authorise her to telework from her place of origin until restrictions relating to the health crisis imposed by the German and Hungarian national authorities are lifted.

Operative part of the order

1. The operation of the decision of the Director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) of 17 December 2020, refusing PJ’s request to telework from her place of origin, is suspended.

2. The EIT shall authorise PJ to telework from the place of residence of her children subject to this being justified by the circumstances relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and without prejudice to the requirement that PJ travel to her place of employment on an ad hoc basis for reasons relating to the interests of the service.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 September 2021 — Mariani and Others v Parliament

(Case T-124/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223 - Cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of OLAF investigations - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 490/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Thierry Mariani (Paris, France) and the 22 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and L. Tapper Brandberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Article 1 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 December 2020 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of the European Anti-Fraud Office investigations (OJ 2020 L 437, p. 49).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union.

3. Mr Thierry Mariani and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

4. The Council shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 July 2021 — Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v Parliament

(Case T-272/21 R)

(Interim relief - Institutional law - Member of Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Waiver of the parliamentary immunity of a Member of the Parliament - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2021/C 412/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó (Waterloo, Belgium), Antoni Comín i Oliveres (Leuven, Belgium), Clara Ponsatí i Obiols (Leuven) (represented by: P. Bekaert, G. Boye, J. Costa i Rosselló and S. Bekaert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N. Görlitz and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the suspension of operation of decisions P9_TA(2021)0059, P9_TA(2021)0060 and P9_TA(2021)0061 of the Parliament of 9 March 2021 on the request for waiver of the applicants’ immunity.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 2 June 2021, Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v Parliament (T-272/21 R) is set aside.

3. The costs of the main parties are reserved.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 November 2021 — ID and Others v Parliament

(Case T-711/21 R)

(Application for interim measures - Civil service - Conditions of access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work related to the health crisis - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2022/C 73/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: ID and the six other applicants whose name appear in the annex to the order (represented by: P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru and L. Panepinto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha, S. Bukšek Tomac and L. Darie, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of the decision of the Bureau of the Parliament of 27 October 2021 on exceptional health and safety rules governing access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.

2. The order of 5 November 2021, ID and Others v Parliament (T-711/21 R) is cancelled.
Order of the General Court of 9 November 2021 — Amort and Others v Commission

(Case T-165/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca — COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S [recombinant])’ - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - No direct concern - No individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 24/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Heidi Amort (Jenesien, Italy) and the 31 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and A. Sipos, as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 698 (final) of 29 January 2021, granting a conditional marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca — COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S [recombinant])’, a medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer a need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by TN, by TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, by VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, by Stefano Del Gaudio and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, and by Dieter Achtschin and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II.

3. Ms Heidi Amort and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex I are ordered to pay the costs.

4. TN, TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, Stefano Del Gaudio and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, and Dieter Achtschin and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 189, 17.5.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 February 2022 — Hoteles Olivencia v EUIPO — Corporacion H10 Hotels (HOTELES HO)

(Case T-707/21) (1)

(2022/C 148/67)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 17.1.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 January 2022 — Santos v EUIPO (Shape of a citrus press)

(Case T-574/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 119/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Santos (Vaulx-en-Velin, France) (represented by: C. Bey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 July 2021 (Case R 281/2020-1), relating to an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a citrus press as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Santos.

(1) OJ C 462, 15.11.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 March 2022 — Miquel y Costas & Miquel v EUIPO (Pure Hemp)

(Case T-17/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 207/54)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Miquel y Costas & Miquel, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Mora Cortés, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 October 2020 (Case R 853/2020-1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign Pure Hemp as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Miquel y Costas & Miquel, SA.

(1) OJ C 72, 1.3.2021.
Order of the General Court of 14 February 2022 — Lagardére, unité médico-sociale v Commission

(Case T-503/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - EU Digital Covid-19 Certificate - Freedom of movement for persons - Restrictions - Incorrect designation of the defendant - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 171/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Lagardère, unité médico-sociale (Ghlin, Belgium) (represented by: P. Vanlangendonck, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti, agent)

Re:

By its action, expressly directed against the European Commission and based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2021 on a framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable COVID-19 vaccination, test and recovery certificates (EU Digital COVID Certificate) to facilitate free movement during the COVID-19 pandemic (OJ 2021 L 211, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

3. Lagardère, unité médico-sociale, shall pay the costs.

4. The Parliament and the Council are to bear their own costs relating to their application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 March 2022 — Gustopharma Consumer Health v EUIPO — Helixor Heilmittel (HELIXFORTE)

(Case T-798/21) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 237/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gustopharma Consumer Health, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Wachinger and R. Drozdz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Helixor Heilmittel GmbH (Rosenfeld, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 October 2021 (Case R 1645/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Helixor Heilmittel and Gustopharma Consumer Health.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Gustopharma Consumer Health, SL shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Scania CV v EUIPO (V8)

(Case T-327/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 222/48)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Scania CV AB (Södertälje, Sweden) (represented by: C. Langenius, P. Sundin and S. Falkner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Bosse and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2021 (Case R 1868/2020-1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign V8 as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Scania CV AB.

(1) OJ C 297, 26.7.2021.
Order of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Zásilkovna v Commission

(Case T-585/21) (1)

(State aid - Compensation granted for the provision of the universal service obligation in the postal sector - Complaint - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 284/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Zásilkovna s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: R. Kubáč, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Carpi Badía and L. Nicolae, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment, first, of the Commission’s letter of 9 July 2021 concerning the compensation granted to Česká pošta for the provision of a universal service obligation for the period from 2018 to 2022 and the decision of 23 June 2020 initiating the formal investigation procedure (SA.55208 (2020/C), SA.55497 (2019/FC) and SA.55686 (2019/FC)) and, second, of the Commission’s letter of 31 August 2021 concerning the compensation granted to Česká pošta for the provision of a universal service obligation for the period from 2018 to 2022 (SA.55208 (2020/C)).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications to intervene of the Czech Republic and Česká pošta.

3. Zásilkovna s. r. o. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.

4. Zásilkovna, the Czech Republic and Česká pošta shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 481, 29.11.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 April 2022 — EurO3zon v ECHA

(Case T-199/21) (1)

(2022/C 276/36)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2022 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Brito & Pereira (TINTAS BRICOR)

(Case T-317/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 359/90)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Brito & Pereira (Vizela, Portugal)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 March 2021 (Case R 882/2020-1).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by El Corte Inglés, SA.

(1) OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2022 — FJ and Others v EEAS

(Case T-246/21) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - EEAS staff posted to a third country - Interim update of correction coefficients - Manifest error of assessment - Retroactive effect - Legal certainty - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 303/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: FJ and the 6 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. Maes, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of their pay slips for the month of July 2020 drawn up by the European External Action Service (EEAS), by which it was decided to apply, for the first time, the correction coefficients fixed with retroactive effect from 1 October 2019 and 1 January 2020.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. FJ and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 242, 21.6.2021.