ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 293/33

Order of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — Pfizer and Pfizer Santé familiale v Commission

(Case T-716/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff and statistical nomenclature - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff subheadings - Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 293/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Pfizer Ltd (Sandwich, United Kingdom) and Pfizer Santé familiale (Paris, France) (represented by: L. Catrain González, lawyer, and E. Wright, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2016/1140 of 8 July 2016 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2016 L 189, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Pfizer Ltd and Pfizer Santé familiale shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/40

Order of the General Court of 22 November 2017 — Digital Rights Ireland v Commission

(Case T-670/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Area of freedom, justice and security - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Transfer of personal data to the United States - Not-for-profit company incorporated under Irish law - No protection of personal data for legal persons - Controller - Action in the name of members and supporters - Action in the public interest - Inadmissible))

(2018/C 022/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (Bennettsbridge, Ireland) (represented by: E. McGarr, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Kranenborg and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250 of 12 July 2016 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequacy of the protection provided by the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield (OJ 2016 L 207, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the French Republic, Business Software Alliance (BSA), Microsoft Corporation, La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network, Fédération des Fournisseurs d’Accès à Internet Associatifs and the Union fédérale des consommateurs — Que choisir (UFC — Que choisir).

3. Digital Rights Ireland Ltd shall pay the costs, with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.

4. The Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the French Republic, BSA, Microsoft Corporation, La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network, Fédération des Fournisseurs d’Accès à Internet Associatifs and UFC — Que choisir shall bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 402/34

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2017 — Guardian Glass España, Central Vidriera v Commission

(Case T-170/16) (1)

((Actions for annulment - State aid - Tax advantages granted by a territorial entity within a Member State - Aid scheme declared to be incompatible with the internal market - Implementation of the decision - Obligation to examine the individual situation of the recipients - Commission’s failure to adopt a position - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 402/44)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Guardian Glass España, Central Vidriera, SLU (Llodio, Spain) (represented by: M. Araujo Boyd, D. Armesto Macías and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of the decision of the Commission contained in a document of 15 July 2015 entitled ‘Tax matters in the Basque Country (Álava) — Informal communication regarding additional submissions in connection to compatibility with the 1998 guidelines on national regional aid’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene lodged by the Kingdom of Spain.

3. Guardian Glass España, Central Vidriera, SLU is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The Kingdom of Spain is to bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 104/41

Order of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — QG v Commission

(Case T-845/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain professional football clubs - Preferential tax rate applied in connection with corporate tax - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market - No interest in bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 104/53)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: QG (represented by: L. Ruiz Ezquerra, R. Oncina Borrego, I. Sobrepera Millet and A. Hernández Pardo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 4046 final of 4 July 2016 on the State aid SA.29769 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by Spain for certain football clubs.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for a decision that there is no need to adjudicate is dismissed.

2. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

3. There is no longer any need to rule on the applications to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona.

4. QG shall pay the costs.

5. QG, the European Commission, the Kingdom of Spain and Fútbol Club Barcelona shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 63/12

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2017 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MONT ORIGINAL Super Slims)

(Case T-292/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Revocation of the earlier EU figurative trade mark GOLD MOUNT - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 063/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Kaane American International Tobacco Co. FZE, formerly Kaane American International Tobacco Co. Ltd (Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez and I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Global Tobacco FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hussey, Solicitor, and B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 (Case R 2492/2014-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Kaane American International Tobacco and Global Tobacco.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Labiri v EESC and Committee of the Regions

(Case T-904/16) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Psychological harassment - Amicable settlement - Implementation of the agreement - [confidential] - Misuse of powers - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2018/C 328/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Vassiliki Labiri (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendants: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka and L. Camarena Januzec, Agents, and M. Troncoso Ferrer and F.-M. Hislaire, lawyers) and Committee of the Regions (represented by S. Bachotet and M. Antonini, Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application, pursuant to Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision dated 11 May 2016 of the Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions, in agreement with the EESC [confidential], in implementation of the amicable settlement in Case F-33/15.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Vassiliki Labiri is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 182/22

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 March 2018 — Hércules Club de Fútbol v Commission

(Case T-766/16 R)

((Interim proceedings - State aid - Aid granted by Spain in favour of certain professional football clubs - Public guarantee granted by a public body - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Application for a stay of proceedings - Lack of urgency))

(2018/C 182/25)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: S. Rating and Y. Martínez Mata, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Gavela Llopis, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking a stay of execution of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/365 of 4 July 2016 on the State aid SA.36387 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (ex 2013/CP) granted by Spain to Valencia Club de Fútbol, Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD and Elche Club de Fútbol, SAD (OJ 2017 L 55, p. 12).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.

2. The order of 11 November 2016, Hércules Club de Fútbol v Commission (T-766/16 R), is set aside.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 1 March 2019 — Baradel and Others v EIF

(Case T-507/16) (1)

(2019/C 148/64)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013 (case initially registered at the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-51/13 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
Order of the General Court of 11 December 2018 — QC v European Council

(Case T-834/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016 - Press release - Notion of ‘international agreement’ - Identification of the author of the act - Scope of the act - Meeting of the European Council - Meeting of the Heads of State or Government of the Member States of the European Union held on the premises of the Council of the European Union - Capacity of the representatives of the Member States of the European Union during a meeting with the representative of a third country - First paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Lack of jurisdiction))

(2019/C 65/42)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: QC (represented by: C. Ladis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Council (represented by: S. Boelaert, M.-M. Joséphidès and J.-P. Hix, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of an alleged agreement concluded between the European Council and the Republic of Turkey dated 18 March 2016 and entitled ‘EU-Turkey Statement, 18 March 2016’ and, secondly, application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the European Council unlawfully failed to take measures.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. QC and the European Council shall bear their own respective costs.

(1) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Timberland Europe v Commission

(Case T-782/16) (1)

(2023/C 35/102)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2021 — Aycinena and Others v Commission

(Case T-537/16) (1)

(2021/C 252/52)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 89, 16.3.2015 (case originally registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-14/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/34

Order of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — TeamLava v EUIPO — King.com (Icônes animées)

(Case T-76/17)

(2017/C 178/56)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/52

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — BASF Grenzach ECHA

(Case T-125/17 R)

((Interim measures - REACH - Substance triclosan - Evaluation procedure - Decision of the Board of Appeal of the ECHA - Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing - Application for interim measures - No urgency))

(2017/C 283/81)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BASF Grenzach GmbH (Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany) (represented by: K. Nordlander and M. Abenhaïm, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: W. Broere, T. Röcke and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures to (i) suspend implementation of Decision A-018-2014 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 19 December 2016, relating to the substance evaluation of triclosan, and (ii) order the extension of the prescribed period to communicate the results of the tests for the duration of the suspension.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 231/54

Order of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Consorzio IB Innovation v Commission

(Case T-84/17) (1)

(2017/C 231/70)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 95, 27.3.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 402/37

Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — Wall Street Systems UK v ECB

(Case T-579/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision of a treasury management system - Rejection of one tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 402/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Wall Street Systems UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Csaki, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: C. Kroppenstedt and I. Köpfer, acting as Agents, and by U. Soltész and A. Neun, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the suspension of operation of the decision rejecting the appeal brought by the applicant in the context of the call for tenders 2016/S 093-165651.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 29 August 2017 made in Case T-579/17 R is cancelled.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 338/22

Order of the General Court of 23 August 2017 — ZGS v EUIPO (Schülerhilfe1)

(Case T-209/17) (1)

(2017/C 338/25)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 168, 29.5.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 104/55

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2018 — Stips v Commission

(Case T-311/17) (1)

(2018/C 104/72)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 42/27

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2017 — Acsen v Parliament and Council

(Case T-381/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Directive 2011/35/EU - Merger of public limited liability companies - Nullity of the merger - No distinction between absolute nullity and relative nullity of the merger - Time-limit for bringing an action - Delay - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 042/40)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Ibram Acsen (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: C. Gagu, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: M. Pencheva and C. Ionescu Dima, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Petrova Cerchia and A. Varnav, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Article 22(1)(c) of Directive 2011/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 concerning mergers of public limited liability companies (OJ 2011, L 110, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Ibram Acsen is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.
Case T-470/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2018 — Sensotek v EUIPO — Senso Tecnologie (senso tek) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark senso tek — Earlier EU figurative mark SENSOTEC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

Order of the General Court of 15 May 2018 — Sensotek v EUIPO — Senso Tecnologie (senso tek)

(Case T-470/17) ( 1 )

‛(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark senso tek — Earlier EU figurative mark SENSOTEC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)’

Parties

Applicant: Sensotek GmbH (Reichenbach an der Fils, Germany) (represented by: J. Klink, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Senso Tecnologie Srl (Rome, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 May 2017 (Case R 1953/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Senso Tecnologie and Sensotek.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1) Dismisses the action;

2) Orders Sensotek GmbH to pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 166/49

Order of the General Court of 13 mars 2018 — Amorepacific v EUIPO — Primavera Life (p primera Pure Sprout Energy)

(Case T-684/17) (1)

(2018/C 166/62)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 412, 4.12.2017.
Order of the General Court of 28 June 2018 — TL v EDPS

(Case T-452/17) (1)

((Actions for annulment - Protection of personal data - Public nature of the case-law of the General Court - Request for anonymisation and removal from the Internet of a judgment of the General Court - Act not open to challenge - Confirmatory act - No new and substantial facts - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 301/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: TL (represented by: T. Léonard and M. Cock, lawyers)

Defendant: European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) (represented by: A. Buchta, M. Pérez Asinari, C. Gayrel and M. Guglielmetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the EDPS of 16 May 2017 rejecting the request seeking, in essence, (i) a new analysis of the question of its jurisdiction in relation to the dissemination on the Internet of the name of a party to proceedings by the Court of Justice of the European Union and (ii) an order that the judgment in [confidential] be anonymised.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. TL and the European Data Protection Supervisor shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Case T-456/17: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 –Lupu v EUIPO — Dzhihangir (Djili soy original DS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark Djili soy original DS — Earlier national word mark DJILI — Relative ground for refusal — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 –Lupu v EUIPO — Dzhihangir (Djili soy original DS)

(Case T-456/17) ( 1 )

‛(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative trade mark Djili soy original DS — Earlier national word mark DJILI — Relative ground for refusal — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)’

Parties

Applicant: Victor Lupu (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: P. Acsinte, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ibryam Dzhihangir (Silistra, Bulgaria) (represented by: C.-R. Romiţan, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 May 2017 (Case R 516/2011-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Lupu and Mr Dzhihangir.

Operative part of the order

1. The plea of inadmissibility is joined to the main proceedings.

2. The action is dismissed.

3. Mr Victor Lupu shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

4. Mr Ibryam Dzhihangir shall bear his own costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.