ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/20

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2013 — Carbunión v Council

(Case T-176/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Decision on aid intended to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines - Partial annulment - Non-severability - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 39/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) (Madrid (Spain)) (represented by: K. Desai, Solicitor, S. Cisnal de Ugarte and M. Peristeraki, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: F. Florindo Gijón and A. Lo Monaco, and subsequently by: F. Florindo Gijón and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by É. Gippini Fournier, L. Flynn and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for partial suspension of operation of Council Decision 2010/787/EU of 10 December 2010 on State aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines (OJ 2010 L 336, p. 24)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. The Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) shall, in addition to bearing its own costs, pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/29

Order of the General Court of 10 September 2013 — Aerooria Aigaiou Aeroporiki and Marfin Investment Group Symmetochon v Commission

(Case T-202/11) (1)

2013/C 336/63

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 160, 28.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/57

Order of the General Court of 12 June 2014 — Makhlouf and Others v Council

(Joined Cases T-432/11, T-490/11, T-649/11, T-651/11, T-97/12, T-99/12 to T-102/12 and T-446/12) (1)

2014/C 303/68

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 159/37

Order of the General Court of 24 March 2014 — High Tech v OHIM — Vitra Collections (Shape of a chair)

(Case T-161/11) (1)

2014/C 159/50

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — ATMvision v Commission

(Case T-627/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/68)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ATMvision AG (Salem, Germany) (represented by: initially, A. Cordewener, F. Kutt and C. Jehke, then, F. Kutt and C. Jehke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche, M. Adam and M. Noll0Ehlers, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Noll-Ehlers and finally, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by ATMvision AG;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/25

Order of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission

(Case T-232/11) (1)

(2015/C 228/30)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 399/23

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Saobraćajni institut CIP v Commission

(Case T-227/12 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public service contracts - Call for tenders concerning the preparation of technical documentation for a rail modernisation project - Exclusion of the applicant from participation in the tender procedure - Annulment of the tender procedure after the action had been brought - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 399/45

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Saobraćajni institut CIP d.o.o. (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: A. Lojpur, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and E. Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for, essentially, interim measures ordering the suspension of the tender procedure in the context of the contract notice published on 3 April 2012 concerning the preparation of technical documentation for a rail modernisation project and excluding the applicant from participating in the tender procedure.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 355/38

Order of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ålands Industrihus v Commission

(Case T-212/12) (1)

2012/C 355/83

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/14

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Al Toun and Al Toun Group v Council

(Case T-326/12) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Removal from the list of persons concerned - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 55/25

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicants: Salim Georges Al Toun (Al Ghassaneya-Lattakia, Syria) and Al Toun Group (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: S. Koev, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou and I. Gurov, Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria and repealing Decision 2011/273/CFSP (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 56), Council Implementing Decision 2012/256/CFSP of 14 May 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782 (OJ 2012 L 126, p. 9), Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and repealing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 (OJ 2012 L 16, p. 1), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 410/2012 of 14 May 2012 implementing Article 32(1) of Regulation No 36/2012 (OJ 2012 L 126, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/49

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 November 2012 — Alstom v Commission

(Case T-164/12 R)

(Interim relief - Competition - Commission decision to transmit documents to a national court - Confidentiality - Right to effective judicial protection - Application for interim measures - Prima facie case - Urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2013/C 26/99

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Alstom (Levallois-Perret, France) (represented by: J. Derenne, lawyer, N. Heaton, P. Chaplin and M. Farley, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Antoniadis, N. Khan and P. Van Nuffel, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: National Grid Electricity Transmission plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Magnus, C. Bryant and E. Coulson, Solicitors, J. Turner QC and D. Beard QC)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the Commission’s decision of 26 January 2012 contained in letters No D/2012/006840 and No D/2012/006863 from the Director General of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition, concerning the transmission of certain documents to the High Court of England and Wales for use in evidence in proceedings brought against the applicant, and an application for confidential treatment to be ordered in the present proceedings in respect of the professional secrets contained in the applicant’s reply of 30 June 2006 to the statement of objections in Case COMP/F/38.899 — Gas insulated switchgear.

Operative part of the order

1. Operation of the Commission’s decision of 26 January 2012 is suspended in so far as that decision concerns the transmission to the High Court of England and Wales of the confidential version of Alstom’s reply of 30 June 2006 to the statement of objections in Case COMP/F/38.899 — Gas insulated switchgear.

2. The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/43

Order of the General Court of 11 April 2013 — Tridium v OHIM — q-bus Mediatektur (SEDONA FRAMEWORK)

(Case T-467/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 156/81

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tridium, Inc. (Richmond, Virginia, United States) (represented by: M. Nentwig, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: q-bus Mediatektur GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M.-T. Schott, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 August 2012 (Case R 1943/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between q-bus Mediatektur GmbH and Tridium, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate in the action.

2. The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/20

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — Henkel and Henkel France v Commission

(Case T-64/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Request seeking to obtain the transmission to the French competition authority of certain documents contained in the Commission’s file relating to competition proceedings concerning the European market for consumer detergents - Use in the context of national proceedings concerning the French detergents sector - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 129/41

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany) and Henkel France (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: R. Polley, T. Kuhn, F. Brunet and É. Paroche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan and P. Van Nuffel, Agents)

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 7 December 2011 (Case COMP/39.579 — Consumer detergents — and Case 09/0007 F) whereby the Commission refused to act on the applicants’ request seeking the transmission to the French competition authority, in the context of Case 09/0007 F concerning the French detergents sector, of several documents produced in Case COMP/39.579, and, secondly, for an order by the General Court requiring the Commission to authorise the applicants to rely on the documents at issue in the proceedings before the French competition authority or before the competent French court in the context of an appeal against the decision of the French competition authority, and for any other measure that the Court deems appropriate.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Unilever PLC and Unilever NV.

3. Henkel AG & Co. KGaA and Henkel France shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/30

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — National Trust for Scotland v OHIM — Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (ST KILDA)

(Case T-222/12) (1)

2013/C 336/64

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/80

Order of the General Court of 17 June 2013 — Meskarian v Council

(Case T-71/12) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Removal of the persons concerned from the list - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 225/177

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mohammed Reza Meskarian (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Zaiwalla, P. Reddy and F. Zaiwalla, Solicitors, D. Wyatt QC, and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and I. Rodios, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for (i) annulment of point 13 of Table A in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), point 13 of Table A in the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11), and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1), in so far as those measures concern the applicant, and (ii) a declaration that Article 20(1)(b) of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39) and Article 16(2) of Council Regulation No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1) are not to apply to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
Order of the General Court of 13 January 2014 — Investigación y Desarollo en Soluciones y Servicios IT v Commission

(Case T-134/12) (1)

(Action for annulment and damages - Contracts concerning financial assistance from the European Union for research and development projects - Plea of inadmissibility - Failure to reclassify forms of order sought - In admissible)

(2014/C 71/38)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Investigación y Desarollo en Soluciones y Servicios IT S.A. (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: M. Jiménez Perona, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and B. Conte, Agents, and J. Rivas Andrés and X. García García, lawyers)

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the decision in the Commission’s letter of 13 January 2012 concerning the reimbursement of the sums mentioned in the debit notes corresponding to the financial audit to which the applicant was subject and, second, a claim for non-contractual liability seeking an order for the Commission to pay damages and interest of EUR 732 768.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Investigación y Desarollo en Soluciones y Servicios IT S.A. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 157, 2.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/20

Order of the General Court of 3 December 2013 — Pri v OHIM — Belgravia Investment Group (PRONOKAL)

(Case T-159/12) (1)

(Removal from the register - Pleading submitted at the time of discontinuance - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 39/34

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Pri SA (Clémency, Luxembourg) (represented by: C. Marí Aguilar and F. Márquez Martín, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Belgravia Investment Group Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: J. Bouyssou, lawyer)

Re:

Firstly, action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 December 2011 (Case R 311/2011-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Pri SA and Belgravia Investment Group Ltd, and, secondly, application for rejection of the application for registration of the mark applied for in respect of all the goods covered by the opposition proceedings.

Operative part of the order

1. Case T-159/12 shall be removed from the register of the General Court.

2. The pleading lodged by Pri SA, contained in the letter filed at the Registry of the General Court on 13 September 2013, requesting, firstly, that the General Court state that the opposition was withdrawn; secondly, that it rescind the decision of the Opposition Division of 7 December 2010 in so far as it rejects in part the opposition; and, thirdly, that it order that the ‘release in full’ of the mark PRONOKAL be registered are rejected as inadmissible.

3. Pri SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by OHIM.

4. Belgravia Investment Group Ltd shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 212/30

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-207/12 P P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Act following a request to place a document on the file compiled for the purposes of examining the application for recognition of an incident suffered by the appellant - Absence of act having adverse effect - preparatory act - Informative measure - Article 94(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal - Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part))

2014/C 212/38

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party/parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser, J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 February 2012 in Case F-3/11 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal.

(1) OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/36

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2014 — Eni v Commission

(Joined Cases T-240/12 and T-211/13) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Partial annulment and alteration by the General Court of the Commission’s decision - Reopening of the procedure - New statement of objections - Closure of the procedure - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 135/46

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Eni SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G.M. Roberti and I. Perego, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, G. Conte, R. Striani and T. Vecchi, Agents)

Re:

In Case T-240/12, application for annulment of the Commission’s decision contained in a letter of 23 April 2012, informing the applicant of the Commission’s intention to reopen the procedure and to adopt a new statement of objections and, in Case T-211/13, application for annulment of Commission decisions C(2013) 1200 final of 26 February 2013 and C(2013) 1199 final of 27 February 2013 to reopen the procedure and to send the applicant a new statement of objections in Case AT. 40032–BR/ESBR — Recidivism, following the partial annulment by the General Court of Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final of 29 November 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene Rubber and Emulsion Styrene Butadiene Rubber).

Operative part of the order

1. Cases T-240/12 and T-211/13 are joined for the purposes of the order.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present actions.

3. Eni SpA and the European Commission shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 217, 21.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/17

Order of the General Court of 4 December 2014 — Alstom v Commission

(Case T-164/12) (1)

((Competition - Action for damages brought before a national court - Request for cooperation - Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Decision of the Commission to transmit information to a national court - Withdrawal of the request - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 056/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Alstom (Levallois-Perret, France) (represented: initially by J. Derenne, lawyer, N. Heaton, P. Chaplin and M. Farley, Solicitors, and subsequently by J Derenne, N Heaton and P Chaplin)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Antoniadis, N. Khan and P. Van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: National Grid Electricity Transmission plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Magnus, C. Bryant, E. Coulson, Solicitors, J. Turner QC, D. Beard QC and L. John, Barrister)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision, communicated to the applicant by letter of 26 January 2012 of the Director General of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition under reference D/2012/006840, to accede to the request for cooperation from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, in so far as it involves the disclosure of information allegedly covered by the obligation of professional secrecy in the applicant’s reply to the statement of objections in Case COMP/F/38.899 — Gas insulated switchgear.

Operative part of the order

1) There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2) The parties shall bear their own costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/25

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2014 — Virgin Atlantic Airways v Commission

(Case T-344/12) (1)

2014/C 329/37

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/60

Order of the General Court of 8 March 2017 — DeMaCo Holland v Commission

(Case T-527/12) (1)

(2017/C 144/82)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 311/60

Order of the General Court of 12 June 2015 — Matrix Energetics International v OHIM (MATRIX ENERGETICS)

(Case T-573/12) (1)

(2015/C 311/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.