ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/34

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008 — Goris v Commission

(Case T-126/04) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Interlocutory judgment - No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 301/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Willem Goris (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 5 May 2003 altering the applicant's classification in grade, in so far as it fixes his classification in step on recruitment in step 2 of Grade B4, fixes 5 October 1995 as the date on which the decision was to have pecuniary effect and did not re-establish the applicant's career grade, and an application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant's complaint and, second, an application for compensation for the damage allegedly caused by that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The Commission shall pay all the costs.

(1) OJ C 118, 30.4.2004.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 8/15

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2007 — Investire Partecipazioni v Commission

(Case T-418/05) (1)

(Action for annulment - ERDF - Measure that cannot be the subject of an action - Preparatory measure - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 8/28)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Investire Partecipazioni SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G.M. Roberti and A. Franchi, Lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Flynn and M. Velardo, Agents, assisted by G. Faedo, Lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of decisions allegedly contained in two letters from the Commission's Directorate General for Regional Policy of 11 and 23 August 2005, addressed to the Permanent Representation of the Italian Republic to the European Union, concerning the ineligibility, for assistance from the European Regional Development Fund, of a measure provided for in the Objective 2 Single Programming Document for the period 1997-1999 concerning the Region of Piedmont (Italy).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Investire Partecipazioni SpA shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 22, 28.1.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/43

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 November 2008 — Abruzzo v Commission

(Case T-384/05) (1)

(2009/C 6/84)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 330, 24.12.2005.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 197/36

Order of the Court of First Instance of 17 June 2008 — Rossi v OHIM — K & L Ruppert Stiftung (Rossi)

(Case T-31/05) (1)

(2008/C 197/66)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 128/36

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 April 2008 — Elektrociepłownia (Zielona Góra) v Commission

(Case T-142/06) (1)

(2008/C 128/77)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 178, 29.7.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 51/60

Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2007 — Estancia Piedra v OHIM — Franciscan Vineyards (ESTANCIA PIEDRA)

(Case T-159/06) (1)

(2008/C 51/109)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 12.8.2006
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 223/41

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 July 2008 — Complejo Agrícola v Commission

(Case T-345/06) (1)

(Action for annulment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Decision 2006/613/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region - Challengeable act - Lack of direct effect - Inadmissible)

(2008/C 223/70)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Complejo Agrícola S.A. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Menéndez Menéndez and G. Yanguas Montero, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and D. Recchia, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, abogado del Estado)

Re:

Partial annulment of Article 1 of, and Annex 1 to, Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2006 L 259, p. 1), in so far as it declares the site designated as ‘Acebuchales de la Campiña sur de Cádiz’, which includes a farm belonging to the applicant, to be a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Complejo Agrícola S.A. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission;

3. The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 183/30

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 May 2008 — Rath v OHIM — Sanorell Pharma (Immunocel)

(Case T-368/06) (1)

(2008/C 183/57)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 327/24

Order of the Court of First Instance of 29 September 2008 — Powderject Research v OHIM (POWDERMED)

(Case T-166/06) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark POWDERMED - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 327/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Powderject Research Ltd (Oxford, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Bryson, Barrister, and P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 April 2006 (Case R 1189/2005-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign POWDERMED as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Powderject Research Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/62

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-38/06) (1)

(2008/C 301/110)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 74, 25.3.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 11/26

Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 October 2009 — Lebard v Commission

(Case T-89/06) (1)

(Action for annulment - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 11/52

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Daniel Lebard (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. de Guillenchmidt, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and F. Amato and, subsequently, M. Gippini Fournier, agents)

Re:

Inter alia, an application for annulment of the decisions of the Commission rejecting, first, the request for a review as to whether the company Aventis had complied with the commitments entered into in connection with the Commission’s decision of 9 August 1999 in Case IV/M.1378 — Hoechst/Rhône-Poulenc, and, second, the application for withdrawal of the Commission’s decision of 13 July 1999 in Case IV/M.1517 — Rhodia/Donau Chemie/Albright & Wilson.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Daniel Lebard shall bear his own costs as well as the costs incurred by the Commission of the European Communities.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Valauret SA.

(1) OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/50

Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 December 2008 — Fédération nationale du Crédit agricole v Commission

(Case T-98/06) (1)

(2009/C 55/91)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 107/43

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 March 2008 — National Association of Licensed Opencast Operators v Commission

(Case T-318/07) (1)

(2008/C 107/75)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 247, 20.10.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 51/43

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 17 December 2007 — Dow AgroSciences and Others v Commission

(Case T-367/07 R)

(Application for interim relief - Directive 91/414/EEC - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Admissibility - No urgency)

(2008/C 51/81)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Dow AgroSciences Ltd (Hitchin, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom); Dow AgroSciences BV (Hoek, Netherlands); Dow AgroSciences Danmark A/S (Kongens Lyngby, Denmark); Dow AgroSciences GmbH, (Munich, Germany); Dow AgroSciences (Mougins, France); Dow AgroSciences Export (Mougins); Dow AgroSciences Hungary kft (Budapest, Hungary); Dow AgroSciences Italia Srl (Milan, Italy); Dow AgroSciences Polska sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland); Dow AgroSciences Distribution (Mougins); Dow AgroSciences Iberica, SA (Madrid, Spain); Dow AgroSciences s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic); Dow AgroSciences LLC (Indianapolis, Indiana, United States) (represented by C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Doherty and L. Parpala, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision 2007/437/EC of 19 June 2007 concerning the non-inclusion of haloxyfop-R in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance (OJ 2007 L 163, p. 22) pending the full resolution of the dispute in the main proceedings.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 183/21

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 May 2008 — Transports Schiocchet — Excursions v Commission

(Case T-220/07) (1)

(Action for damages - Limitation period - Article 46 of the Statute of the Court - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 183/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Transports Schiocchet — Excursions SARL (Beuvillers, France) (represented by: D. Schönberger, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.-F. Pasquier and N. Yerrell, Agents)

Re:

Application for damages for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of various alleged illegal acts complained of against the Community institutions.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Transports Schiocchet — Excursions SARL shall bear the costs.

(1) OJ C 199 of 25.8.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 171/49

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2008 — Slovak Republic v Commission

(Case T-32/07) (1)

(2008/C 171/95)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/39

Order of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2008 — Cemex Polska v Commission

(Case T-203/07) (1)

(Action for annulment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - National allocation plan in respect of emission allowances for Poland for the period from 2008 to 2012 - Decision by the Commission not to raise objections subject to certain conditions - Competence of Member States in the individual allocation of emission allowances - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 301/66)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Cemex Polska sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: F. Puel and M. Szpunar, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U.Wölker and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 1295 final of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by the Republic of Poland for the period from 2008 to 2012 in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Cemex Polska sp. z o.o. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

(1) OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 223/43

Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 July 2008 — Polimeri Europa v Commission

(Case T-12/07) (1)

(No need to give a decision)

(2008/C 223/73)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Polimeri Europa SpA (Brindisi, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, F. Moretti and L. Nascimbene, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci, F. amato and V Bottka, agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Manufacture Française des Pneumatiques Michelin (represented by: S. Kon and L. Farell, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the Commission's decision COMP/F/2/1095 of 6 November 2006, taken in the context of a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC (Case COMP/F//38.638 BR/ESBR) to forward to Manufacture Française des Pneumatiques Michelin, admitted to the administrative procedure as an interested third party, the non-confidential version of the statement of objections of 6 April 2006 addressed to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to give a decision in this action;

2. Polimeri Europa SpA is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission and by Manufacture Française des Pneumatiques Michelin in these proceedings, and to pay those incurred by the Commission in the interlocutory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 56, of 10.3.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 327/42

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-494/07) (1)

(2008/C 327/79)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/65

Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 September 2008 — Dow Agrosciences and Others v Commission

(Case T-470/07) (1)

(2008/C 301/127)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 82/24

Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 February 2009 — Vitro Corporativo v OHIM — Vallon (√)

(Case T-229/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2009/C 82/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Vitro Corporativo, SA de C.V. (Nuevo Leon, Mexico) (represented by: J. Botella Reyna, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. López Fernández de Corres, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Vallon GmbH (Horb, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 November 2006 (Case R 1363/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Vitro Corporativo, SA de C.V. and Vallon GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 199, 25.8.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/35

Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 November 2008 — Fastweb v Commission

(Case T-188/07) (1)

(State aid - Subsidised purchase of digital decoders - Telecommunications - Commission decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market - Decision adopted in the course of the present proceedings by the Member State not to effect recovery of the aid from the company which contested the Commission's decision in annulment proceedings - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2009/C 32/66)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Fastweb SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola and T. Ubaldi, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Martenczuk, G. Conte and E. Righini, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Sky Italia Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. González Díaz and D. Gerard, lawyers); and Centro Europa 7 Srl (Rome) (represented by: R. Mastroianni, F. Ferraro and M. Condinanzi, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/374/EC of 24 January 2007 on State aid C 52/2005 (ex NN 88/2005, ex CP 101/2004) implemented by the Italian Republic for the subsidised purchase of digital decoders (OJ 2007 L 147, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 170 of 21.7.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 24/69

Order of the Court of First Instance of 23 November 2009 — Brilliant Hotelsoftware v OHIM (BRILLIANT)

(Case T-337/07) (1)

2010/C 24/124

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) C 269, 10.11.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 167/10

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2009 — US Steel Košice v Commission

(Case T-22/07) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Act of Accession - Condition imposed on the beneficiary to limit its sales of flat products in the ‘enlarged EU’ - Commission letter interpreting the condition as applying to the Bulgarian and Romanian markets from the date of their accession - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 167/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: US Steel Košice s.r.o. (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: E. Vermulst and S. Van Cutsem, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Gross and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Slovak Republic (represented by: J. Čorba, Agent)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 22 November 2006, inasmuch as it interprets the condition imposed on the applicant to limit its sales of flat products in the ‘enlarged EU’ as applying also, from 1 January 2007, to the Bulgarian and Romanian markets.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. US Steel Košice s.r.o. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

3. The Slovak Republic shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 328/57

Order of the General Court of 7 October 2010 — Sepracor v OHIM — Laboratorios Ern (LEVENIA)

(Case T-280/07) (1)

()

2010/C 328/88

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 148/50

Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — France v Commission

(Case T-279/07) (1)

2010/C 148/81

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 171/40

Order of the General Court of 23 April 2013 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-221/07) (1)

2013/C 171/82

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 199, 25.8.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/13

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Traxdata France v OHIM — Ritrax (TRAXDATA, TEAM TRAXDATA)

(Case T-365/07) (1)

(Trade mark - Action for annulment - Applicant’s failure to proceed - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 39/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Traxdata France SARL (Paris, France) (represented initially by F. Valentin, B. Amaudric du Chaffaut and G. Courtois, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Ritrax Corporation Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M.H. Blair, M.J. Gilbert, S.S. Malynicz and C.A.N. Balme, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2007 (Joined Cases R 1337/2005-1, R 1338/2005-1, R 1339/2005-1 and R 1340/2005-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between Ritrax Corporation Ltd and Traxdata France SARL.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on this action.

2. Traxdata France SARL is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 197/25

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 25 April 2008 — Vakakis v Commission

(Case T-41/08 R)

(Community tendering procedure - Interim proceedings - Loss of an opportunity - Locus standi - Admissibility of the main application - Urgency - Measures of inquiry)

(2008/C 197/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Vakakis International — Symvouli gia Agrotiki Anaptixi AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: B. O'Connor, Solicitor)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Wilderspin and G. Boudot, Agents)

Re:

Application for an order granting interim measures in the context of the service tender procedure EuropeAid/125241/C/SER/CY for the supply of ‘Technical Assistance to Support Rural Development Policy’ in the Northern Part of Cyprus.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The application for measures of inquiry or organisation of procedure is dismissed.

3. There is no need for a decision on the application for leave to intervene.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 92/29

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 13 February 2008 — Buczek Automotive v Commission

(Case T-1/08 R)

(Interim measures - Application for suspension of operation - Article 105(2) of the Rules of Procedure)

(2008/C 92/60)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Buczek Automotive sp, z o.o. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: T. Gackowski, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2007) 5087 final of 23 October 2007 concerning State aid No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Suspends, until the adoption of the order concluding the present application for interim measures, the operation of Commission Decision C(2007) 5087 final of 23 October 2007 concerning State aid No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek, insofar as that decision concerns Buczek Automotive sp, z o.o.