ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 9 October 2019 — Essity Hygiene and Health v EUIPO (Representation of a leaf)

(Case T-607/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a leaf - Absolute ground for refusal - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 423/68)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Essity Hygiene and Health AB (Gothenburg, Sweden) (represented by: U. Wennermark, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 July 2018 (Case R 2196/2017-5) concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing a leaf as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 September 2019 — VV v Commission

(Case T-242/18) (1)

(2019/C 363/45)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — La Marchesiana v EUIPO — Marchesi 1824 (MARCHESI)

(Case T-35/18) (1)

(2020/C 77/83)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Taminco v Commission

(Case T-740/18 R)

(Application for interim measures - Plant protection products - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Active substance thiram - Conditions of approval for placing on the market - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency)

(2020/C 19/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Taminco BVBA (Ghent, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mereu and S. Englebert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Koleva, A. Lewis and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1500 of 9 October 2018 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance thiram, and prohibiting the use and sale of seeds treated with plant protection products containing thiram, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2018 L 254, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2020 — Mellifera v Commission

(Case T-393/18) (1)

(2021/C 53/84)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — Antonakopoulos v Parliament

(Case T-590/18) (1)

(2020/C 240/46)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2022 — Caprice Schuhproduktion v Commission

(Case T-157/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/56)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Scordis, Papapetrou & Co and Others v Council and Others

(Case T-179/18) (1)

(2021/C 252/56)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Order of the President of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Sophia Group v Parliament

(Case T-578/19 R)

(Interim measures - Public service contracts - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

(2019/C 363/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sophia Group (Saint-Josse-ten-Noode, Belgium) (represented by: Y. Schneider and C.-H. de la Vallée Poussin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Tapper Brandberg and S. Toliušis, Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures seeking, first, the suspension of operation of the Parliament’s decision dated 30 July 2019 to award Lot No 1 of the tender for the ‘Provision of Buildings HelpDesk services’ (Call for tenders 06A0010/2019/M011) to another tenderer, and, secondly, the suspension of the contract concluded with that other tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 2 May 2019 — Jap Energéticas y Medioambientales v Commission

(Case T-145/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - Environment - Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE) - Project LIFE 11 ENV/ES/000593-H2AL RECYCLING - Recovery of sums paid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2019/C 213/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Jap Energéticas y Medioambientales, SL (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: G. Alabau Zabal, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and S. Izquierdo Pérez, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Decision BUDG/DGA 1/C4/CB/3241812545 of 14 January 2019 regarding the recovery from the applicant of the sum of EUR 82 750.96 plus default interest.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — CupoNation v EUIPO (Cyber Monday)

(Case T-494/19) (1)

(2019/C 413/80)

Language of the case: German

The President of the General Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.
Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Drex Technologies v Council

(Case T-61/19) (1)

(Action for compensation - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Lack of competence)

(2019/C 399/82)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Drex Technologies SA (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by A. Jaume and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the adoption of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16) and its subsequent implementing acts, and as a result of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 of 17 May 2019 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2019 L 132, p. 36), in so far as those decisions concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Drex Technologies SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2019 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO (Representation of two curved red lines arranged one above the other)

(Case T-290/19) (1)

(2020/C 27/74)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 October 2019 — Taghani v Commission

(Case T-313/19) (1)

(2019/C 432/83)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Silgan International and Silgan Closures v Commission

(Case T-808/19 R)

(Interim measures - Competition - Request for information - Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

(2020/C 95/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Silgan International Holdings BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) and Silgan Closures GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: D. Seeliger, H. Wollmann, R. Grafunder, B. Meyrind and E. Venot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Ernst, L. Wildpanner, A. Keidel and G. Meessen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 8501 final of 20 November 2019 relating to proceedings under Article 18(3) and Article 24(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case AT.40522 — Metal packaging).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER)

(Case T-74/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark DENIM HUNTER - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 61/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DK Company A/S (Ikast, Denmark) (represented by: S. Hansen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Hunter Boot (Edinburgh, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2018 (Case R 849/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Hunter Boot and DK Company.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 March 2020 — Lucaccioni v Commission

(Case T-507/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Preparatory act - Action for compensation - Action closely related to the action for annulment - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 175/35)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Arnaldo Lucaccioni (San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy) (represented by: E. Bonanni, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking (i) annulment of the decision of the Commission of 13 September 2018 rejecting the application for the recusal of doctor A, a medical practitioner appointed by the Commission to a medical committee established in the context of a request on the part of the applicant seeking recognition of the aggravation of an occupational disease and (ii) compensation for the harm that the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Arnaldo Lucaccioni is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 March 2020 — Bibita Group v EUIPO — Benkomers (Beverage bottles)

(Case T-180/19) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a beverage bottle - Earlier international design - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 137/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bibita Group SHPK (Tirana, Albania) (represented by: C. Seyfert, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Benkomers OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 January 2019 (Case R 1070/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Bibita Group and Benkomers.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by Bibita Group SHPK.

(1) OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Order of the General Court of 6 May 2020 — Sabo and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-141/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Environment - Energy - Directive (EU) 2018/2001 - Inclusion of forest biomass among the sources of renewable energy - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 222/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Peter Sabo (Tulčik, Slovakia) and the 9 other applicants whose names appear in the Annex to the order (represented by: R. Smith, A. Dews and C. Day, Solicitors, D. Wolfe QC and P. Lockley and B. Mitchell, Barristers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. McDowell, C. Ionescu Dima and A. Tamás, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Lo Monaco and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment in part of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ 2018 L 328, p. 82), in so far as it includes forest biomass among the sources of renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene made by the Commission, U.S. Industrial Pellet Association, Stichting Dutch Biomass Certification and Stichting RBCN (Rotterdam Biomass Commodities Network).

3. Mr Peter Sabo and the other applicants whose names appear in the Annex shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

4. The Commission, U.S. Industrial Pellet Association, Stichting Dutch Biomass Certification and Stichting RBCN (Rotterdam Biomass Commodities Network) shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — BV v Commission

(Case T-320/19) (1)

(2020/C 201/72)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 June 2020 — Sherpa Europe v EUIPO — Núcleo de comunicaciones y control (SHERPA NEXT)

(Case T-170/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 313/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Sherpa Europe, SL (Erandio, Spain) (represented by: M. Esteve Sanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. García Murillo and M. J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Núcleo de comunicaciones y control, SL (Tres Cantos, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 December 2018 (Case R 523/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Núcleo de comunicaciones y control and Sherpa Europe.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Sherpa Europe, SL, is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. Núcleo de comunicaciones y control, SL, shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.
Order of the General Court of 16 June 2020 — etc-gaming and Casino-Equipment v Commission

(Case T-803/19) (1)

(Action for damages - Failure by the European Union to introduce an effective remedy offering suitable redress for a failure on the part of the national courts to submit a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 262/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: etc-gaming GmbH (Vienna, Austria) and Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH (Vienna) (represented by A. Schuster, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by L. Armati, G. Braun and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicants claim to have suffered as a result of the failure by the European Union to introduce an effective remedy offering suitable redress for a failure on the part of the national courts to submit a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice.

Operative part

1. The action is dismissed.

2. etc-gaming GmbH and Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Order of the General Court of 31 July 2020 –TO v EEAS

(Case T-272/19) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Refusal to employ on the ground that the candidate is unfit to perform duties - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Public policy - Delay - Calculation of the time limit - Determination of the date from which the person concerned could have become aware of the content of the decision - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 371/12)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, on the one hand, annulment, first, of the EEAS decision of 15 June 2018 informing the applicant that she did not fulfil all of the conditions of employment laid down in Article 82 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union and that she could not be recruited as a member of the contract staff of the EEAS and, second, of the decision of the EEAS of 14 January 2019 rejecting her complaint of 14 September 2018, and, on the other hand, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2. TO shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Order of the General Court of 14 July 2020 — Sasol Germany and Others v ECHA

(Case T-640/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - REACH - Substances of very high concern - Establishment of a candidate list of substances for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Decision identifying 4-tert-butylphenol as a substance meeting the criteria for inclusion in the list - Objection of inadmissibility - Act not open to challenge - Act merely implementing the decision - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 348/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Sasol Germany GmbH (Hamburg, Germany), SI Group — Béthune (Béthune, France), BASF SE (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: C. Mereu, P. Sellar and S. Saez Moreno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä and W. Broere, acting as Agents, and by S. Raes, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the partial annulment of Decision ED/71/2019 of ECHA in so far as it includes 4-tert-butyphenol as a substance of very high concern in the list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1, corrigendum OJ 2007 L 136, p. 3).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Sweden and the European Commission.

3. Sasol Germany GmbH, SI Group — Béthune and BASF SE shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.

4. Sasol Germany GmbH, SI Group — Béthune, BASF SE, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 October 2020 — Grammer v EUIPO (Representation of a geometric figure)

(Case T-833/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a geometric figure - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 28/78)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Grammer AG (Ursensollen, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2019 (Case R 1478/2019-2), relating to the application for registration of a figurative sign representing a geometric figure as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2) Grammer AG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — CrossFit v EUIPO — Hochwarter (CROSSBOX)

(Case T-835/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 390/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CrossFit Inc. (Scotts Valley, California, United States) (represented by: D. Mărginean, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Marlis Hochwarter (Vienna, Austria)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2019 (Case R 1832/2018-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between CrossFit and Marlis Hochwarter.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by CrossFit Inc.

(1) OJ C 36, 3.2.2020.