ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/13

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Tivoli — Italy) — Antonella Pedone v N

(Case C-498/12) (1)

(Preliminary references - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Requirement of link with European Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2013/C 108/26

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Tivoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Antonella Pedone

Defendant: N

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Tivoli — Interpretation of Article 47(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, read in conjunction with Article 6 TEU and Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Legal aid — National legislation providing that consultancy fees are to be reduced by half where the client has been granted legal aid

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Tivoli (Italy).

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/57

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 27 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — JS v Česká správa sociálního zabezpečení (The Czech social security administration)

(Case C-253/12) (1)

2013/C 225/115

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/59

Order of the President of the Court of 22 May 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Cyprus

(Case C-545/12) (1)

2013/C 225/127

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 304/3

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2013 — Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE v European Commission, EU Delegation to Turkey, Central Finance & Contracts Unit (CFCU)

(Case C-520/12 P) (1)

(Appeals - Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance - Public procurement - Project for the enlargement of the European Turkish Business Centres Network - Decision not to award the project - Application for damages for the alleged losses - National decision - No involvement by European Union bodies)

2013/C 304/05

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE (represented by: A. Krystallidis, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and F. Erlbacher, acting as Agents), EU Delegation to Turkey, Central Finance & Contracts Unit (CFCU)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 September 2012 in Case T-369/11 Diadikasia Symbouloi Epicheiriseon AE v European Commission, Central Finance & Contracts Unit (CFCU) and Delegation of the European Union to Turkey, by which the General Court dismissed an application for damages seeking compensation for harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following a decision by the Delegation of the European Union to Turkey not to award the applicant the contract to carry out the project ‘Enlargement of the European Turkish Business Centers Network to Sivas, Antakya, Batman and Van’ (EuropeAid/128621/D/SER/TR) — Inadmissibility — Lack of jurisdiction

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/48

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Harald Wohlfahrt v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Ferrero SpA

(Case C-357/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Articles 8(1)(b) and 43(2) - Word sign ‘Kindertraum’ - Opposition of the proprietor of the earlier national word mark Kinder)

2013/C 225/83

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Harald Wohlfahrt (represented by: M. Loschelder and V. Schoene, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent), Ferrero SpA (represented by: F. Jacobacci and L. Ghedina, avvocati)

Re:

Appeal lodged against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 May 2012 in Case T-580/10 Wohlfahrt v OHIM — Ferrero (Kindertraum) by which that court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 October 2010 (Case R 815/2009-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Ferrero SpA and Mr Harald Wohlfahrt — Registration of the word sign ‘Kindertraum’ for goods in Classes 16 and 28 — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier word mark ‘Kinder’ — Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 42(2), and 75, first sentence, of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Harald Wohlfahrt shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 287, 22.9.2012
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/28

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland, interveners: Kingdom of the Netherlands, Federal Republic of Germany, Czech Republic, Republic of Finland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Republic of Estonia

(Case C-598/12) (1)

2014/C 102/39

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 377/9

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 26 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Vâlcea — Romania) — SC Volksbank România SA v Ionuț-Florin Zglimbea, Liana-Ramona Zglimbea

(Case C-108/12) (1)

2013/C 377/19

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 151, 26.5.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/2

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Bloomsbury NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-510/12) (1)

((Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Fourth Directive 78/660/EEC - Article 2(3) - Principle of a true and fair view - Article 2(4) - Obligation to inform - Article 2(5) - Obligation to depart from the principle of a true and fair view - Article 32 - Valuation method based on historical cost - Acquisition by a company of an asset free of charge))

2014/C 184/03

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van Beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bloomsbury NV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) — Interpretation of Article 2(3), (4) and (5) of Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies (OJ 1978 L 222, p. 11) — Principle of a true and fair view — Acquisition by a company of an important asset free of charge — Not possible for the company to enter the value of that acquisition in its accounts as a distorted impression would thereby be given of its assets, financial situation and results

Operative part of the order

Paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of Article 2 of Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article [44(2)(g) EC] on the annual accounts of certain types of companies must be interpreted as meaning that, where a company acquires an important asset free of charge, it is under no obligation to enter that asset in the accounts at its true value.

(1) OJ C 46, 16.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/23

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 18 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Pia Braun v Region Hannover

(Case C-603/12) (1)

2014/C 184/33

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 101, 6. 4. 2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/8

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad průmyslového vlastnictví — Czech Republic) — MF 7 a.s. v MAFRA a.s.

(Case C-49/13) (1)

((Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ - Proceedings intended to lead to a decision of a judicial nature - Independence - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 102/10

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Úřad průmyslového vlastnictví

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MF 7 a.s.

Defendant: MAFRA a.s.

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Úřad průmyslového vlastnictví — Interpretation of Article 3(2)(d) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 2008 L 299, p. 25) — Criteria for the assessment of bad faith — Influence of circumstances which occurred after the application for registration was filed on the assessment of the good faith of the applicant — Consent by the proprietor of the trade mark to conduct which might limit its exclusive rights — Contracts concluded between the proprietor of the earlier trade mark and the applicant for the later trade mark not governing intellectual property rights — Tolerance of the contested trade mark by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark for a prolonged period.

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Úřad průmyslového vlastnictví (Czech Republic) in its decision of 22 January 2013.

(1) OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 377/10

Order of the President of the Court of 12 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

(Case C-203/13) (1)

2013/C 377/22

Language of the case: Bulgarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 164, 8.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/33

Order of the President of the Court of 31 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance d’Orléans — France) — Facet SA, BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v Saïda Bouchelaghem, Nathalie Cousin, Clémentine Benoni, Hili Aziz, Mohamed Zouhir, Jean Morel, Jalid Anissa, Marine Bourreau, Anthony Cartier, Patrick Rousselière, Karine Lenfant

(Case C-298/13) (1)

2014/C 175/43

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 215, 27. 7. 2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/10

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 November 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) — United Kingdom) — Glaxosmithkline Biologicals SA, Glaxosmithkline Biologicals, Niederlassung der Smithkline Beecham Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks

(Case C-210/13) (1)

((Medicinal products for human use - Supplementary protection certificate - Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 - Concepts of ‘active ingredient’ and ‘combination of active ingredients’ - Adjuvant))

2014/C 102/13

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Glaxosmithkline Biologicals SA, Glaxosmithkline Biologicals, Niederlassung der Smithkline Beecham Pharma GmbH & Co. KG

Defendants: Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) — Interpretation of Article 1(b) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (OJ 2009 L 152, p. 1) — Concept of ‘active ingredient’ and ‘combination of active ingredients’ — Adjuvant which does not have a therapeutic effect of its own but enhances the therapeutic effect in an antigen.

Operative part of the order

Article 1(b) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products must be interpreted as meaning that, just as an adjuvant does not fall within the definition of ‘active ingredient’ within the meaning of that provision, so a combination of two substances, namely an active ingredient having therapeutic effects on its own, and an adjuvant which, while enhancing those therapeutic effects, has no therapeutic effect on its own, does not fall within the definition of ‘combination of active ingredients’ within the meaning of that provision.

(1) OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/7

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 January 2014 — Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-324/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Word mark PATRICIA ROCHA - Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROCHAS - Refusal to register by the Opposition Division of OHIM - Inadmissibility of the action brought before the Board of Appeal of OHIM))

2014/C 184/10

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Appellant: Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda (represented by: A. J. Rodrigues, advogado)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 April 2013 in Case T-360/11 Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços v OHIM — Parfums Rochas (PATRIZIA ROCHA) by which the General Court dismissed an action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 April 2011 (Case R 2355/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Parfums Rochas SAS and Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda. is ordered to pay the costs

(1) OJ C 260, 07.09.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/25

Order of the President of the Court of 13 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción de Marchena — Spain) — Caixabank SA v Antonio Galán Rodríguez

(Case C-486/13) (1)

2014/C 184/41

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/10

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Gmina Międzyzdroje v Minister Finansów

(Case C-500/13) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Deduction of input tax - Capital goods - Immovable property - Adjustment of deductions - National legislation providing for an adjustment period of 10 years))

2014/C 261/16

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gmina Międzyzdroje

Defendant: Minister Finansów

Operative part of the order

Articles 167, 187 and 189 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax together with the principle of neutrality of value added tax must be interpreted as not precluding provisions of national law, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which, in a case where there is a change in the purpose of immovable property acquired as capital goods from an initial use in activities not conferring entitlement to deduct input tax to a subsequent use in activities which do confer such entitlement, provide for an adjustment period of 10 years starting from the time at which the goods are first used and, therefore, do not permit a one-off adjustment during a single tax year.

(1) OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 253/23

Order of the President of the Court of 3 April 2014 — Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Henkel France v European Commission, Denmark

(Case C-283/13 P) (1)

2014/C 253/32

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/17

Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, interveners: Kingdom of Belgium and Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-9/13) (1)

2014/C 261/26

Language of the case: Slovenian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/4

Order of the Court of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli (Italy)) — Luigi D'Aniello and Others v Poste Italiane SpA

(Case C-89/13) (1)

((Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Principle of non-discrimination - National legislation providing for a compensation scheme in cases of the unlawful setting of an expiry date for an employment contract different from that in cases where an employment contract of unlimited duration is unlawfully terminated - Economic consequences - Comparability of the claims))

2014/C 261/05

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Napoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Luigi D'Aniello, Ester Di Vaio, Anna Di Benedetto, Antonella Camelio, Angela Leva, Alessia Romano, Emilia Aloia, Cira Oligo, Ottavio Russo, Guiseppe D’Ambra, Stefano Caputo, Ilaria Pappagallo, Maurizio De Rosa, Gianluca Liguori, Dario Puzone, Vincenzo De Luca, Guido Gorbari, Raffaella D’Ambrosio

Defendant: Poste Italiane SpA

Operative part of the order

Subject to the possibility available to the Member States by virtue of clause 8 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, clause 4(1) of that framework agreement must be interpreted as meaning that it does not require identical treatment of the economic consequences granted in cases of the unlawful setting of an expiry date for an employment contract and those paid in cases of the unlawful termination of an employment contract of unlimited duration.

(1) OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/31

Order of the President of the Court of 18 August 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia supported by: Federal Republic of Germany, Kingdom of Belgium, Kingdom of the Netherlands, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Republic of Poland, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-240/13) (1)

2014/C 409/43

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/45

Order of the President of the Court of 10 July 2014 — European Commission v Council of the European Union: interveners: European Parliament, Federal Republic of Germany and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-86/13) (1)

2014/C 315/74

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal do Trabalho de Lisboa — Portugal) — Sindicato Nacional dos Profissionais de Seguros e Afins v Via Directa — Companhia de Seguros SA

(Case C-665/13) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination - National legislation establishing salary reductions for certain public sector employees - No implementation of EU law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2015/C 016/16)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal do Trabalho de Lisboa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sindicato Nacional dos Profissionais de Seguros e Afins

Defendant: Via Directa — Companhia de Seguros SA

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to take cognisance of the present request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal do Trabalho de Lisboa (Portugal), by order of 28 October 2013 (Case C-665/13).

(1) OJ C 85, 22.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/24

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna (Bulgaria)) — Levent Redzheb Yumer v Direktor na Teritoriyalna direktsia na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite — Varna

(Case C-505/13) (1)

((Income tax - Article 2 TEU - Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principles of legal certainty, effectiveness and proportionality - Farmers’ right to a reduction of income tax - Exclusion of natural persons carrying out agricultural activity - Implementation of EU law - No implementation - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 409/35

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad — Varna

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Levent Redzheb Yumer

Defendant: Direktor na Teritoriyalna direktsia na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite — Varna

Operative part of the order

1. The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria), by decision of 5 September 2013.

2. The first and second questions referred are manifestly inadmissible in so far as they relate to the interpretation of Article 2 TEU.

(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/20

Order of the President of the Court of 16 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 2 de Marchena — Spain) — Caixabank SA v Francisco Javier Brenes Jiménez, Andrea Jiménez Jiménez

(Case C-548/13) (1)

(2015/C 213/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/7

Order of the Court of 22 January 2015 — GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Villiger Söhne GmbH

(Case C-496/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Figurative mark in colour, consisting of the verbal components ‘LIBERTE american blend’ on a red background - Opposition by the holder of the Community trade mark ‘La LIBERTAD’ - Refusal of registration))

(2015/C 146/10)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (represented by: I. Memmler and Schulz, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent), Villiger Söhne GmbH (represented by: H. MacKenzie, Rechtsanwältin)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.