ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the President of the General Court of 30 April 2010 — Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-18/10 R)

(Applications for interim measures - Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 - Trade in seal products - Ban on import and sale - Exception in favour of Inuit communities - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Admissibility - Prima facie case - No urgency)

(2010/C 161/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (Ottawa, Canada); Nattivak Hunters and Trappers Association (Qikiqtarjuaq, Canada); Pangnirtung Hunters’ and Trappers’ Association (Pangnirtung, Canada); Jaypootie Moesesie (Qikiqtarjuaq); Allen Kooneeliusie (Qikiqtarjuaq); Toomasie Newkingnak (Qikiqtarjuaq); David Kuptana (Ulukhaktok, Canada); Karliin Aariak (Iqaluit, Canada); Efstathios Andreas Agathos (Athens, Greece); Canadian Seal Marketing Group (Quebec, Canada); Ta Ma Su Seal Products (Cap-aux-Meules, Canada); Fur Institute of Canada (Ottawa); NuTan Furs, Inc (Catalina, Canada); GC Rieber Skinn AS (Bergen, Norway); Inuit Circumpolar Conference Greenland (ICC) (Nuuk, Greenland, Denmark); Johannes Egede (Nuuk); and Kalaallit Numaanni Aalisartut Piniartullu Kattuffiat (KNAPK) (Nuuk) (represented by: J. Bouckaert, M. van der Woude and H. Viaene, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by I. Anagnostopoulou and L. Visaggio, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on trade in seal products (OJ 2009 L 286, p. 36)

Operative part of the order

1. The opinion of the Legal Service of the Council of the European Union of 18 February 2009 on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning trade in seal products, submitted by the Commission of the European Communities (COM(2008) 469 final of 23 July 2008), set out in Annex A-4 to the application for interim measures, and the extract from that opinion contained in paragraph 16 of that application are removed from the file in Case T-18/10 R.

2. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 August 2010 — Footwear v OHIM — Reno Schuhcentrum (swiss cross FOOTWEAR)

(Case T-49/10) (1)

()

(2010/C 288/123)

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 234/38

Order of the President of the General Court of 9 July 2010 — Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission

(Case T-177/10 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Preferential electricity tariffs - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

2010/C 234/69

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl (Portoscuso, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, T. Müller-Ibold and F. Salerno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Gippini Fournier, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission decision C(2009) 8112 final of 19 November 2009 on the State aid C 38/A/2004 (ex NN 58/2004) and C 36/B/2006 (ex NN 38/2006) implemented by the Italian Republic in favour of Alcoa Trasformazioni.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 72/33

Order of the General Court of 12 January 2011 — Maximuscle v OHIM — Foreign Supplement Trademark (GAKIC)

(Case T-198/10) (1)

2011/C 72/52

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/25

Order of the General Court of 17 November 2010 — Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission

(Case T-61/10) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Failure to adopt measures - Application for directions to be issued - Request for protective measures - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2011/C 13/50

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez (Seville, Spain) (represented by: initially, N. Domínguez Varela and, subsequently, P. Suarez Plácido, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N Görlitz, P. López-Carceller, agents) and European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and I. Martinez del Peral, agents)

Re:

Application for a declaration of failure to act on the part of the European Parliament and the European Commission in that those institutions unlawfully failed to respond to the applicant’s letter of 6 October 2009, an application for directions to be issued and a request for protective measures.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez is ordered to pay the costs.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Mr. Ignacio Ruipérez Aguirre and the ACT Petition Association.

(1) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010, p. 58.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 152/21

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 April 2011 — Xeda International v Commission

(Case T-71/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Directive 91/414/EEC - Decision concerning the non-inclusion of diphenylamine in Annex I to Directive 91/414 - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 152/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Xeda International SA (Saint-Andiol, France) (represented by: C. Mereu, K. Van Maldegem, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and L. Parpala, Agents, assisted by J. Stuyck, lawyer)

Re:

Application, essentially, for suspension of operation of Commission Decision 2009/859/EC of 30 November 2009 concerning the non-inclusion of diphenylamine in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance (OJ 2009 L 314, p. 79) pending judgment in the main proceedings.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 113/14

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 16 February 2011 — Nencini v Parliament

(Case T-560/10 R)

(Interim measures - Member of the European Parliament - Recovery of allowances for parliamentary assistance and travel - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

2011/C 113/29

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Riccardo Nencini (Barberino di Mugello, Italy) (represented by: F. Bertini, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, A. Caiola and D. Moore, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of various decisions of the European Parliament ordering the recovery of parliamentary allowances allegedly unduly paid

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 232/29

Order of the General Court of 15 June 2011 — Ax v Council

(Case T-259/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - European Union financial assistance to a Member State experiencing serious economic or financial disruption - Regulation establishing the conditions and procedures under which European Union financial assistance may be granted - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - No direct concern - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 232/53

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Ax (Neckargemünd, Germany) (represented by: J. Baumann, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: T. Middleton, M. Bauer and D. Gregorio Merino, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P Keppenne, H. Krämer, Agents) and Republic of Latvia (represented by: M. Borkoveca and A. Nikolajeva, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism (OJ 2010 L 118, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Thomas Ax is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The Republic of Latvia and the European Commission are ordered to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 179/16

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Socitrel v Commission

(Case T-413/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application for suspension of operation - Pecuniary damage - No exceptional circumstances - No urgency)

2011/C 179/28

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Socitrel — Sociedade Industrial de Trefilaria, SA (Trofa, Portugal) (represented by: F. Proença de Carvalho and T. Luísa de Faria, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, V. Bottka and P. Costa de Oliveira, Agents, and M. Marques Mendes, lawyer)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a procedure pursuant to Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressed steel) and for waiver of the obligation to establish a bank guarantee in order to prevent the immediate recovery of the fine imposed under Article 2 of that decision.

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed;
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/22

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 September 2011 — Fulmen v Council

(Case T-439/10 R)

(Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 319/46

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Fulmen (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: A. Kronshagen, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, Agents)

Party intervening in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis, T. Scharf and E. Cujo, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the following contested measures in so far as they concern the applicant:

— Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39);

— Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25);

— Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 81);

— Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/19

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — Goutier v OHIM — Rauch (ARANTAX)

(Case T-13/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to give judgment)

2011/C 282/37

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Klaus Goutier (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: E.E. Happe, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by B. Schmidt and then by B. Schmidt and R. Pethke, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Norbert Rauch (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 November 2009 (Case R 1796/2008-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Norbert Rauch and Klaus Goutier.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to give judgment in the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to bear his own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The intervener will bear his own costs.

(1) OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 362/21

Order of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — Confortel Gestión v OHIM — Homargrup (CONFORTEL AQUA 4)

(Case T-521/10) (1)

2011/C 362/33

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 331/21

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — ara v OHIM

(Case T-397/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Failure to submit the statement of grounds of appeal to the Board of Appeal within the prescribed time-limit Decision of the Board of Appeal rejecting an application of the full re-establishment of the applicant's rights - Action manifestly lacking a legal basis)

2011/C 331/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ara AG (Langenfeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Allrounder SARL (Sarrebourg, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 June 2010 (Case R 1543/2009-1) concerning the applicant's application for full re-establishment of the its rights

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed as manifestly lacking a legal basis.

2. ara AG is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 133/25

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2012 — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria v Commission

(Case T-225/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme allowing the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of the aid - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 133/48

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Munõz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 58/9

Order of the General Court of 11 January 2012 — Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v Commission

(Case T-58/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - German system of allowances paid to employees of insolvent undertakings and the financing thereof - Decision finding no State aid - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 58/17

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Phoenix-Reisen GmbH (Bonn, Germany); and Deutscher Reiseverband eV (DRV) (Berlin, Germany) (represented by R. Gerharz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by L. Flynn and B. Martenczuk, agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by T. Henze, J. Möller and B. Klein, agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 8707 final of 19 November 2009 declaring that the system of allowances paid to employees of insolvent undertakings and the financing thereof under German legislation does not constitute State aid (State aid NN 55/2009) (OJ 2009 C 323, p. 5).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. Phoenix-Reisen GmbH and Deutscher Reiseverband eV (DRV) shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/69

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 November 2012 — Nordzucker v Commission

(Case T-100/10) (1)

2013/C 26/135

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/23

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2012 — RTI and Elettronica Industriale v Commission

(Case T-506/10) (1)

2012/C 273/41

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/48

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2014 — H v Council and Others

(Case T-271/10) (1)

((Application for annulment - Application for damages - Common foreign and security policy - National expert seconded to the EUPM in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Decision to redeploy - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/82

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: H (Catania, Italy) (represented initially by: C. Mereu and M. Velardo, and subsequently by M. Velardo, lawyers)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro, G. Marhic and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents); European Commission (represented by F. Erlbacher and B. Eggers, acting as Agents); and European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina))

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the decision of 7 April 2010, signed by the Chief of Personnel of the EUPM, by which the applicant was redeployed to the post of ‘Criminal Justice Adviser — Prosecutor’ in the regional office of Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and, if needed, of the decision of 30 April 2010, signed by the Head of Mission referred to in Article 6 of Council Decision 2009/906/CFSP of 8 December 2009 on the EUPM in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) (OJ 2009 L 322, p. 22), confirming the decision of 7 April 2010, and second, for damages,

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Ms H shall bear her own costs and those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/42

Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — Zuckerfabrik Jülich v Commission

(Case T-66/10) (1)

(Agriculture - Sugar - Production levies - Partial annulment and declaration of nullity of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 156/78

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Zuckerfabrik Jülich GmbH (formerly Zuckerfabrik Jülich AG) (Jülich, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Prieß and B. Sachs, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by: F. Diez Moreno and subsequently by: A. Rubio Gonzâlez, abogados del Estado), and Republic of Lithuania (represented initially by: R. Janeckaitè and R. Krasuckaitè, and subseqeuntly by: R. Krasuckaitè and R. Makevičienè, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 of 3 November 2009 correcting Regulations (EC) No 1762/2003, (EC) No 1775/2004, (EC) No 1686/2005, (EC) No 164/2007 and fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for marketing years 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005, 2005/2006 (OJ 2009 L 321, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the present action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those of Zuckerfabrik Jülich GmbH.

3. The Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Lithuania shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 392/28

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-114/10) (1)

((Action for annulment - ERDF - Reduction in financial aid - Programme Interreg II/C programme ‘Rhine-Meuse flood’ - Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action manifestly well founded))

(2017/C 392/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by: J. Möller and C. Blaschke, and subsequently by: J. Möller and T. Henze, acting as Agents, and U. Karpenstein, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann, B. Conte and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the form of order sought by the applicant: French Republic (represented initially by: G. de Bergues and B. Messmer, and subsequently by: D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents), and Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented initially by: C. Wissels and M. Noort, and subsequently by: M. Bulterman and B. Koopman, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10712 of 23 December 2009 on the reduction in the financial aid granted to the Rhine-Meuse flood protection programme under Community initiative programme Interreg II/C in the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) pursuant to Commission Decision C(97)3742 of 18 December 1997 (ERDF No 970010008).

Operative part of the order

1. Commission Decision C(2009) 10712 of 23 December 2009 on the reduction in the financial aid granted to the Rhine-Meuse flood protection programme under Community initiative programme Interreg II/C in the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) pursuant to Commission Decision C(97)3742 of 18 December 1997 (ERDF No 970010008) is annulled insofar as it concerns the Federal Republic of Germany.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Federal Republic of Germany.

3. The French Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.