ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 380/11

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee v Commission

(Case T-113/11) (1)

((Action for annulment - Registration of a protected geographical indication - ‘Gouda Holland’ - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 380/14

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Loschelder and V. Schoene, lawyers)

Defendant: The Commission (represented by: initially, G. von Rintelen and M. Vollkommer, then G. von Rintelen and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: The Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, J. Langer, M. Noort, B. Koopman and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents); and Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie (Zoetermeer, the Netherlands) (represented by: P. van Ginneken, F. Gerritzen and C. van Veen, lawyers)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1122/2010 of 2 December 2010 entering a designation in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Gouda Holland (PGI)] (OJ 2010 L 317, p. 22).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisee eV shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/27

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — France v Commission

(Case T-478/11) (1)

((State aid - Measures taken by a national inter-professional pig and pork producers council - Financing by voluntary contributions made mandatory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 184/46

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: initially E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, J. Gstalter and J. Rossi, then E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, D. Colas and J. Bousin, Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially B. Stromsky, C. Urraca Caviedes and S. Thomas, then B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2011) 4376 final of 29 June 2011 relating to State aid No NN 10/2010 — France — Tax to finance a national inter-professional pig and pork producers council

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — CB v Commission

(Case T-619/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/65)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: CB (represented by: initially, T. Hackemann and H. Horstkotte, then, T. Hackemann and F. von Bredow, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by CB;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 39, 11.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 232/20

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2016 — Regency Entertainment Psychagogiki kai Touristiki v Commission

(Case T-635/11) (1)

((State aid - Annulment of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 232/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Regency Entertainment Psychagogiki kai Touristiki AE (Maroussi Attikis, Greece) (represented by: N. Niejahr, lawyer, F. Carlin, Barrister, Q. Azau, F. Spyropoulos, I. Dryllerakis, K. Spyropoulos, A. Komninos, K. Struckmann, lawyers, and M. Powell, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal, D. Triantafyllou and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE (Loutraki, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011 on State aid C 16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by Greece in favour of certain Greek casinos (OJ 2011 L 285, p. 25).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Regency Entertainment Psychagogiki kai Touristiki AE.

3. Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 209/13

Order of the General Court of 25 May 2012 — Planet v European Commission

(Case T-59/12) (1)

2012/C 209/23

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 118, 21.4.2012
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 373/13

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2012 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-105/12) (1)

2012/C 373/25

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 133, 5.5.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/10

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 September 2012 — Elitaliana v Eulex Kosovo

(Case T-213/12 R)

(Interim measures - Public contracts - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tender - Application for interim measures - Disregard of the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 319/19

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Elitaliana SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: R. Colagrande, lawyer)

Defendant: Eulex Kosovo (Pristina, Republic of Kosovo) (represented by: G. Brosadola Pontotti, solicitor)

Re:

Action brought, in essence, to suspend the execution of the Eulex Kosovo decision rejecting the tender that the applicant had submitted in the public contract award procedure ‘EuropeAid/131516/D/SER/XK — Helicopter Support to the EULEX Mission in Kosovo (PROC/272/11)’ and awarding that contract to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/27

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2012 — Viasat Broadcasting UK v Commission

(Case T-210/12) (1)

2013/C 32/48

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/49

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 November 2012 — Evonik Degussa v Commission

(Case T-341/12 R)

(Interim measures - Competition - Publication of a decision by which the Commission finds an infringement of provisions which prohibit cartels - Refusal of the request for confidential treatment of information provided to the Commission pursuant to its Leniency Notice - Weighing up of interests - Urgency - Prima facie case)

2013/C 26/100

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Evonik Degussa GmbH (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Steinle, M. Holm-Hadulla and C. von Köckritz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, M. Kellerbauer and G. Meessen, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2012) 3534 final of 24 May 2012 rejecting a request for confidential treatment made by the applicant (Case COMP/38.620 — Hydrogen peroxide and perborate) and an application for interim measures seeking to maintain the confidential treatment granted to certain information concerning the applicant on the publication of a more detailed version of Commission Decision 2006/903/EC of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/C.38.620 — Hydrogen peroxide and perborate) (OJ 2006 L 353, p. 54).

Operative part of the order

1. The operation of Commission Decision C(2012) 3534 final of 24 May 2012 rejecting a request for confidential treatment brought by Evonik Degussa GmbH, pursuant to Article 8 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings is suspended.

2. The Commission is ordered to refrain from publishing on its website or any other place or to make available to third parties a version of its Decision 2006/903/EC of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement against Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals Holding AB, Eka Chemicals AB, Degussa AG, Edison SpA, FMC Corporation, FMC Foret S.A., Kemira OYJ, L’Air Liquide SA, Chemoxal SA, Snia SpA, Caffaro Srl, Solvay SA/NV, Solvay Solexis SpA, Total SA, Elf Aquitaine SA and Arkema SA (Case COMP/F/C.38.620 — Hydrogen Peroxide and perborate), which is more complete, in relation to the applicant, than that published in September 2007 on the Commission’s Competition Directorate General website.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 141/26

Order of the General Court of 27 March 2013 — Advance Magazine Publishers v OHIM — Bauer Consumer Media (GOLF WORLD)

(Case T-194/12) (1)

2013/C 141/50

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 101/18

Order of the General Court of 7 February 2013 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (ubee)

(Case T-408/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Opposition withdrawn - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 101/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ubee Interactive Corp. (Jhubei City, Taiwan) (represented by: M. Nentwig, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Augere Holdings (Netherlands) BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 July 2012 (Case R 1848/2011-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Augere Holdings (Netherlands) BV and Ubee Interactive Corp.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 298/11

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2013 — bpost v Commission

(Case T-412/12) (1)

2013/C 298/18

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 343, 10.11.2012.
3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it seeks the annulment of Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation No 961/2010, and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation No 961/2010, in so far as those measures concern the applicant.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/31

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2013 — Wirtgen v OHIM (Shape of a chisel holder)

(Case T-179/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Refusal of registration - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

2014/C 45/52

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH (Windhagen, Germany) (represented by: S. Jackermeier, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 February 2012 (Case R 1923/2011-4), concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional mark in the form of a chisel holder as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/13

Order of the General Court of 7 October 2013 — Roland v OHIM — Textiles Well (wellness inspired by nature)

(Case T-191/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 359/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Roland SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: O. Rauscher and C. Onken, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Textiles Well (Le Vigan, France) (represented by: E. Cornu and É. De Gryse, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 February 2012 (Case R 2552/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Textiles Well SA and Roland SE, formerly Roland-Schuhe GmbH & Co. Handels KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs borne by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/28

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — Interbev v Commission

(Case T-18/12) (1)

((State aid - Measures taken by Interbev - Financing by voluntary contributions made mandatory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 184/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Association nationale interprofessionnelle du bétail et des viandes (Interbev) (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Morrier and A. Bouviala, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, then B. Stromsky, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/131/EU of 13 July 2011 on levies for Interbev (OJ 2012 L 59, p. 14).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 80, 17.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/34

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Lídl Music (LIDL)

(Case T-226/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark LIDL - Earlier national figurative mark LÍDL MUSIC - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 15(1) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2014/C 102/54

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: initially by M. Schaeffer, M. Wolter and A. Marx, and subsequently by M. Wolter, A. Marx and M. Kefferpütz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Lídl Music spol. s r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 March 2012 (Case R 2380/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Lídl Music spol. s r.o. and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action.

2. Orders Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 421/42

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2014 — MPM-Quality and Eutech v OHIM — Elton Hodinářská (MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949)

(Case T-215/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949 - Earlier international and national marks PRIM - Bad faith - Article 165(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 41 and 56 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

2014/C 421/59

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicants: MPM-Quality v.o.s. (Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic); and Eutech a.s. (Šternberk, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Gája and D. Botis, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Elton Hodinářská a.s. (Nové Mesto nad Metují, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Matoušek, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2012 (Case R 826/2010-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between (i) MPM-Quality v.o.s. and Eutech a.s. and (ii) Elton Hodinářská a.s.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders MPM-Quality v.o.s. and Eutech a.s to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 292/59

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2014 — Torrefacção Camelo v OHIM — Lorenzo Pato Hermanos (Decoration for packaging)

(Case T-302/12) (1)

2014/C 292/74

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 270/67

Order of the General Court of 6 June 2016 — Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA

(Case T-560/12) (1)

(2016/C 270/72)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 138/48

Order of the General Court of 26 February 2015 — Lavazza v OHIM — Commercialunione prima (LAVAZZA A MODO MIO)

(Case T-392/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 138/63)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Lavazza SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: A. Vanzetti, M. Ricolfi, G. Sironi and C. Mezzetti, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by F. Mattina, subsequently by F. Mattina and N. Bambara, and finally by N. Bambara and P. Bullock, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Commercialunione Prima Srl (Bresso, Italy) (represented by: G. Celona and B. Dosi, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 June 2012 (Case R 124/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Commercialunione Prima Srl and Luigi Lavazza SpA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs borne by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 298/6

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2013 — ClientEarth and Stichting BirdLife Europe v European Commission

(Case T-56/13) (1)

(Access to documents of the institutions - Document held by the Commission concerning European Union energy policy - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 298/10

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom); and Stichting BirdLife Europe (Zeist, Netherlands) (represented by: O. Brouwer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the Commission’s implied decision to refuse the applicants access to a document concerning European Union energy policy.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by ClientEarth and Stitching BirdLife Europe.

(1) OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/21

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 March 2013 — Elan v Commission

(Case T-27/13 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery from the beneficiary - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2013/C 129/42

Language of the case: Slovene

Parties

Applicant: Elan, proizvodnja športnih izdelkov, d.o.o. (Begunje na Gorenjskem, Slovenia) (represented by: P. Pensa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Kocjan, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2012) 6345 final of 19 September 2012 on the measures taken in favour of the group Elan d.o.o. (SA.26379 (C 13/2010) (ex NN 17/2010))

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/19

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — CSF v Commission

(Case T-337/13 R)

(Interim measures - Public health, safety, consumers and workers protection in order to address the risks resulting from the use of machinery - Measure taken by the Danish authorities prohibiting a type of multi-purpose earthmoving machinery without an appropriate protective structure - Commission decision declaring the measure to be justified - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2014/C 15/28

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: CSF Srl (Grumolo delle Abbadesse, Italy) (represented by: R. Santoro, S. Armellini and R. Bugaro, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Zavvos, acting as Agent, and by M. Pappalardo, lawyer)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision 2013/173/EU of 8 April 2013 on a measure taken by Denmark under Article 11 of Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council prohibiting a type of multi-purpose earthmoving machinery (OJ 2013 L 101, p. 29).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.