ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 81/19

Order of the General Court of 13 January 2015 — Vakoma v OHIM — VACOM (VAKOMA)

(Case T-535/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark VAKOMA - Earlier Community word mark VACOM - Application instituting proceedings - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 081/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Vakoma GmbH (Magdeburg, Germany) (represented by: P. Kazzer, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: VACOM Vakuum Komponenten & Messtechnik GmbH (Jena, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 August 2013 (Case R 908/2012-1), relating to opposition proceedings between VACOM Vakuum Komponenten & Messtechnik GmbH and Vakoma GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

2. Vakoma GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/31

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2014 — Fialtor v Commission and ECB

(Case T-294/13) (1)

((Action for annulment and compensation - Stability support programme for Cyprus - Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the ESM - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Causal link - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 026/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fialtor Ltd (Berlize City, Berlize) (represented by: C. Paschalides, Solicitor, and A. Paschalides, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders and J.-P. Keppenne, Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

First, application for annulment of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 of the Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) on 26 April 2013, and, second, for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the inclusion of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 in the Memorandum of Understanding and an infringement of the Commission’s supervisory obligation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Fialtor Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/25

Order of the General Court of 18 May 2015 — GRE v OHIM — Villiger Söhne (LIBERTE american blend)

(Case T-30/13) (1)

(2015/C 228/33)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 138/49

Order of the General Court of 3 March 2015 — Gemeente Nijmegen v Commission

(Case T-251/13) (1)

((Actions for annulment - State aid - Aid granted by a Netherlands municipality in favour of a professional football club - Decision to open the formal examination procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU - Aid measure completely implemented on the date of the decision - Admissibility - Challengeable act))

(2015/C 138/64)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Gemeente Nijmegen (Netherlands) (represented by: H. Janssen and S. van der Heul, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 1152 final of 6 March 2013 concerning the aid granted to Netherlands professional football clubs Vitesse, NEC, Willem II, MVV, PSV and FC Den Bosch between 2008 and 2011 (State aid SA.33584 (2013/C) (ex 2011/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2) Gemeente Nijmegen is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 429/29

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2015 — ECC Couture v OHIM — Ball Wholesale (Culture)

(Case T-28/13) (1)

(2015/C 429/38)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/51

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — Adler Modemärkte v OHIM — Blufin (MARINE BLEU)

(Case T-296/13) (1)

(2015/C 320/68)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 152/34

Order of the General Court of 21 February 2018 — MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack v EUIPO — Cryo-Save (CryoDafe)

(Case T-482/13) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 152/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG (Billerbeck, Germany) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cryo-Save AG (Freienbach, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 July 2013 (Case R 1759/2012 4), relating to opposition proceedings between Cryo-Save AG and MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action;

2. MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG and Cryo-Save AG are ordered to jointly and severally to bear the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

3. MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG et Cryo-Save AG are ordered to bear their own costs in accordance with the terms of their agreement.

(1) OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/60

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2017 — T&L Sugars and Sidul Açúcares v Commission

(Case T-225/13) (1)

(2017/C 144/83)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 311/62

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2015 — Navitar v OHIM — Elukuva (NaviTar)

(Case T-93/15) (1)

(2015/C 311/72)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 205/34

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 April 2015 — CRM v Commission

(Case T-43/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Registration of a protected geographical indication - ‘Piadina Romagnola/Piada Romagnola’ - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2015/C 205/45)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: CRM Srl (Modena, Italy) (represented by: G. Forte, C. Marinuzzi and A. Franchi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and J. Guillem Carrau, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1174/2014 of 24 October 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Piadina Romagnola/Piada Romagnola (PGI)) (OJ 2014 L 316, p. 3).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 398/56

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the General Court of 15 October 2015 — Ahrend Furniture v Commission

(Case T-482/15 R)

((Interim measures - Public procurement - Call for tenders - Provision of furniture - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer - Application for interim measures - Prima facie case not made out))

(2015/C 398/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Ahrend Furniture (Zaventem, Belgium) (represented by: initially, A. Lepièce, V. Dor and S. Engelen, then A. Lepièce, V. Dor, S. Engelen and F. Caillol, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and J. Estrada de Solà, agents)

Re:

Primarily, an application for a suspension of operation of the Commission’s decision by which that institution awarded Lot No 1 of the call for tenders OIB.DR.2/PO/2014/055/622 — ‘Provision of furniture’ to another tenderer and, in the alternative, an application seeking an order for the production of documents concerning the financial analysis of the tenders and for suspension of operation of that decision until the expiry of a new standstill period of ten days from the date on which those documents are sent.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 26 August 2015 delivered in Case T-482/15 R is set aside.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 337/12

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — NK Rosneft and Others v Council

(Case T-69/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Lis pendens - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 337/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: NK Rosneft OAO (Moscow, Russia); RN-Shelf-Arctic OOO (Moscow); RN-Shelf-Dalniy Vostok ZAO (Yuzhniy-Sakhalin, Russia); RN-Exploration OOO (Moscow); and Tagulskoe OOO (Krasnoyarsk, Russia) (represented by: T. Beazley QC)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Council Decision 2014/872/CFSP of 4 December 2014 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, and Decision 2014/659/CFSP amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP (OJ 2014 L 349, p. 58), and Council Regulation (EU) No 1290/2014 of 4 December 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, and amending Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (OJ 2014 L 349, p. 20), in so far as those acts concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2) NK Rosneft OAO, RN-Shelf-Arctic OOO, RN-Shelf-Dalniy Vostok ZAO, RN-Exploration OOO and Tagulskoe OOO shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 68/28

Order of the General Court of 17 December 2015 — Garcia Minguez v Commission

(Case T-357/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Recruitment - Commission internal competition open to the institution’s temporary staff - Non-admission to a member of the temporary staff of an executive agency - Article 29(1)(b) of the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment - Appeal manifestly devoid of any basis in law))

(2016/C 068/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Maria Luisa Garcia Minguez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Ortiz Blanco and Á. Givaja Sanz, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall, G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, and subsquently by: G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2015 in Garcia Minguez v Commission (F-72/14, ECR-SC, EU:F:2015:40), seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Ms Maria Luisa Garcia Minguez shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2015
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/61

Order of the General Court of 17 November 2015 — Certuss Dampfautomaten v OHIM — Universal for Engineering Industries (Universal 1800 TC)

(Case T-329/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceeding - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 038/82)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: J. Sroka, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Universal for Engineering Industries SAE (Giza, Egypt)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 April 2015 (Case R 1303/2014-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Universal for Engineering Industries SAE and Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal.

2. Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 165/21

Order of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — Eurorail v Commission and INEA

(Case T-589/15) (1)

(2016/C 165/28)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/45

Order of the General Court of 16 February 2016 — Ludwig Bertram v OHIM — Seni Vita (Sanivita)

(Case T-58/15) (1)

(2016/C 136/63)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/24

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2016 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-551/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - EAGF and EAFRD - Period within which proceedings must be commenced - Point from which time starts to run - Delay - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 200/34)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, P. Estêvão and J. Saraiva de Almeida, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and J. Guillem Carrau, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1119 of 22 June 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2015 L 182, p. 39) in so far as that decision excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Portuguese Republic.

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. The Portuguese Republic shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 389, 23.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 191/31

Order of the President of the General Court of 7 April 2016 — ADR Center v Commission

(Case T-364/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Arbitration clause - Agreements concluded for the purpose of carrying out projects subsidised by the European Union within the framework of the ‘Civil Justice’ programme - Enforceable decision of the Commission to recover the sums paid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency))

(2016/C 191/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ADR Center Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: L. Tantalo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Cappelletti and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the enforcement of Commission Decision C(2015) 3117 final of 4 May 2015 concerning the recovery of a sum of EUR 432 637,97, plus interest, owed by ADR Center Srl with reference to debit notes Nos 3241408192 and 3241409206 relating to EUR 155 507,97 and EUR 277 130 respectively.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 22 January 2016 is cancelled in so far as it relates to Case T-364/15 R.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/28

Order of the General Court of 7 June 2016 — Beele Engineering v EUIPO (WE CARE)

(Case T-222/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark WE CARE - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 279/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Beele Engineering BV (Aalten, the Netherlands) (represented by: M. Ring, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 February 2015 (Case R 1933/2014-1), relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign WE CARE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Beele Engineering BV shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 251/31

Order of the General Court of 11 May 2016 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-168/15) (1)

((EAFRD - Withdrawal of the contested measure - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 251/36)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: G. Kanellopoulos, E. Leftheriotou and A. Vasilopoulou, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Aquilina and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 252 final of 26 January 2015 concerning the reduction of the interim payments relating to Greece’s rural development programme CCI 2007 GR 06 RPO 001 for the 2007-13 programming period and to the expenditure in respect of the periods from 1 January 2014 to 31 March 2014 and from 1 April 2014 to 30 June 2014.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/34

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Bena Properties v Council

(Case T-469/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/55)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 335/47

Order of the General Court of 19 July 2016 — Panzeri v Parliament and Commission

(Case T-677/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of undue payments - Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings - No need to adjudicate - Preparatory measure - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 335/62)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Pier Antonio Panzeri (Calusco d’Adda, Italy) (represented by: C. Cerami, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and G. Corstens, acting as Agents) and European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment (i) of the letter from the Director of Directorate B ‘Members’ Financial and Social Entitlements’ of the European Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finance dated 21 September 2015 concerning recovery from the applicant of a sum of EUR 83 764,34 and enclosing the related debit note of 18 September 2015 and (ii) of the letter from the Secretary General of the Parliament of 27 July 2012 informing the applicant of the findings of an investigation into the use of his parliamentary allowances.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it is directed against the letter from the Director of Directorate B ‘Members’ Financial and Social Entitlements’ of the European Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finance dated 21 September 2015 and against Debit Note No 2015-1320 of 18 September 2015.

2. For the rest, the action is dismissed as inadmissible.

3. Mr Pier Antonio Panzeri shall pay, in addition to his own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission.

4. The Parliament shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 428/16

Order of the General Court of 28 September 2016 — PAN Europe and Others v European Commission

(Case T-600/15) (1)

((Actions for annulment - Plant-protection products - Active substance sulfoxaflor - Inclusion in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 428/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (Brussels, Belgium), Bee Life European Beekeeping Coordination (Bee Life) (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium), Unione nazionale associazioni apicoltori italiani (Unaapi) (Castel San Pietro Terme, Italy) (represented by: B. Kloostra and A. van den Biesen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin, G. von Rintelen and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1295 of 27 July 2015, approving the active substance sulfoxaflor, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2015 L 199, p. 8).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene from the European Crop Protection Association (ECPA), Dow AgroSciences Ltd and Dow AgroSciences Iberica SA.

3. Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe), Bee Life European Beekeeping Coordination (Bee Life) and Unione nazionale associazioni apicoltori italiani (Unaapi) shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. PAN Europe, Bee Life, Unaapi, the Commission, ECPA, Dow AgroSciences and Dow AgroSciences Iberica shall each bear their own costs in relation to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/35

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

(Case T-471/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/57)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/61

Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission

(Case T-150/15) (1)

(2017/C 144/88)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.