ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 366/34

Order of the General Court of 28 September 2012 — Heads! v OHIM (HEADS)

(Case T-639/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Refusal to register - Withdrawal of the application to register - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 366/68

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Heads! GmbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz and T. Bösling, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Walicka, agent)

Re:

Action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 October 2011 (Case R 2348/2010-1) relating to an application for registration of the word mark ‘HEADS’ as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/13

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2012 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-320/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Out of time - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 55/23

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, K. Szíjjártó and K. Veres, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/192/EU of 28 March 2011 excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by Hungary under the programme for the support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development (Sapard) in 2004 (OJ 2011 L 81, p. 14).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Hungary is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/17

Order of the General Court of 4 December 2012 — Lenz v Commission

(Case T-78/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Public service - Officials - Social security - Reimbursement of the costs of treatment provided by a ‘Heilpraktiker’ - Obligation to state reasons - Distortion of the facts)

2013/C 32/26

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Erika Lenz (Osnabrück, Germany) (represented by: V. Lenz and J. Römer, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 14 December 2010 in Case F-80/09 Lenz v Commission [2010] ECR II-A-1-0000, and seeking that that judgment be set aside

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Ms Erika Lenz is to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/41

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2013 — Nutrichem Diät + Pharma v OHIM — Gervais Danone (Active)

(Case T-414/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 260/73

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Nutrichem Diät + Pharma GmbH (Roth, Germany) (represented by: D. Jochim and R. Egerer, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by K. Klüpfel and subsequently by D. Walicka, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Compagnie Gervais Danone (Levallois Perret, France) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 May 2011 (Case R 683/2010-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Nutrichem Diät + Pharma GmbH and Compagnie Gervais Danone.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener are ordered to bear their own costs and each pay half the costs of the defendant.

(1) OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 164/17

Order of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Oster Weinkellerei v OHIM — Viñedos Emiliana (Igama)

(Case T-474/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Annulment of the opposing trade mark - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 164/31

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Andreas Oster Weinkellerei KG (Cochem, Germany) (represented by: N. Schindler, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Viñedos Emiliana, SA (Las Condes, Santiago, Chili)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 June 2011 (Case R 637/2010-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Andreas Oster Weinkellerei KG and Viñedos Emiliana, SA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and OHIM shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 319, 29.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/35

Order of the General Court of 10 March 2014 — Magnesitas de Rubián and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-158/11) (1)

((Environment - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Individual decision contained in Article 13(7) of Directive 2010/75/EU - Application for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate - Dismissal - Discontinuance - Removal from the register))

2014/C 135/44

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Magnesitas de Rubián, SA (Incio, Spain); Magnesitas Navarras, SA (Zubiri, Spain); and Ellinikoi Lefkolithoi Anonymos Metalleftiki, Viomichaniki, Naftiliaki kai Emporiki Etaireia (Athens, Greece) (represented by: H. Brokelmann and P. Martínez-Lage Sobredo, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: initially M. Gómez-Leal, I. Anagnostopoulou and L. Visaggio, and subsequently M. Gómez-Leal and M. Visaggio, Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Florindo Gijón and K. Michoel, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially A. Alcover San Pedro and L. Banciella Rodríguez-Miñón, and subsequently by S. Petrova and E. Sanfrutos Cano, Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the individual decision contained in Article 13(7) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (OJ 2010 L 334, p. 17), insofar as it imposes an obligation on the Member States to respect the conclusions on best available techniques contained in section 3.5 of the Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide Manufacturing Industries (OJ 2010 C 166, p. 5), as regards the conditions of the permits which the competent authorities grant to manufacturing facilities for magnesium subject to permits under that directive.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate is dismissed.

2. Case T-158/11 is removed from the Register of the General Court.

3. Magnesitas de Rubián, SA, Magnesitas Navarras, SA and Ellinikoi Lefkolithoi Anonymos Metalleftiki, Viomichaniki, Naftiliaki kai Emporiki Etaireia shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

4. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/11

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2013 — Lyder Enterprises v CPVO — Liner Plants (1993) (SOUTHERN SPLENDOUR)

(Case T-367/11) (1)

(Plant varieties - Application for a Community plant variety right for the plant variety SOUTHERN SPLENDOUR - Objections - Rejection of the application by the Board of Appeal of the CPVO - Competence of the CPVO - Taking of evidence - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 359/20

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lyder Enterprises Ltd (Auckland, New Zealand) (represented by: G.J. Pickering, Solicitor)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO, intervener before the General Court: Liner Plants (1993) Ltd (Waitakere, New Zealand) (represented by: P.S. Jonker, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 4 May 2011 (Case A 7/2010), concerning the grant of a Community plant variety right for the plant variety SOUTHERN SPLENDOUR

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Lyder Enterprises Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/16

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2014 — AQ v Parliament

(Case T-168/11) (1)

((Action for compensation - Compensation for damage suffered by the applicant following the decision of the Parliament to take no further action on his petition - Request to initiate an inquiry into the alleged irregularities in the proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 056/22)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: AQ (Żary, Poland) (represented by: P. K. Rosiak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Zejdová, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action for compensation for the damage suffered by the applicant following the decision of the Parliament to take no further action on his petition requesting the opening of an inquiry into the alleged irregularities in the proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr AQ is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those of the European Parliament.

3. The amount of the legal aid to be paid by the cashier of the General Court is fixed at EUR 1 653,36.

(1) OJ C 250, 18.8.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 253/66

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Makhlouf v Council

(Cases T-433/11 and T-98/12) (1)

2014/C 253/90

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.
Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Sky Deutschland and Sky Deutschland Fernsehen v Commission

(Case T-626/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Sky Deutschland GmbH, formerly Sky Deutschland AG, (Unterföhring, Germany), and Sky Deutschland Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG (Unterföhring) (represented by: initially, A. Cordewener, F. Kutt and C. Jehke, then, F. Kutt and C. Jehke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche, M. Adam and M. Noll-Ehlers, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Noll-Ehlers and finally, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Sky Deutschland GmbH and Sky Deutschland Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Wagon Automotive Nagold v Commission

(Case T-610/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH (Nagold, Germany) (represented by: initially, T. Hackemann and H. Horstkotte, then, T. Hackemann and F. von Bredow, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/23

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Gas v OHIM — Grotto (BLUE JEAN GAS)

(Case T-93/12) (1)

2012/C 273/44

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 399/23

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Saobraćajni institut CIP v Commission

(Case T-219/12 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public service contracts - Call for tenders concerning the preparation of technical documentation for a railway modernisation project - Exclusion of the applicant from participating in that tendering procedure - Annulment of the tendering procedure after the action had been brought - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 399/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Saobraćajni institut CIP d.o.o. (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: A. Lojpur, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and E. Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application seeking, in essence, interim measures ordering suspension of the tendering procedure in the context of the contract notice published on 27 March 2012 concerning the preparation of technical documentation for a railway modernisation project and excluding the applicant from participating in the tendering procedure.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 355/38

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Western Digital and Western Digital Ireland v Commission

(Case T-60/12) (1)

2012/C 355/81

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/27

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 — Robert Group v OHIM — Hardford Sweden (Pierre Robert)

(Case T-86/12) (1)

2013/C 32/47

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/50

Order of the General Court of 21 November 2012 — Grupo T Diffusión v OHIM — ABR Producción Contemporánea (Lampe)

(Case T-343/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of that application - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 26/101

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Grupo T Diffusión, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Lasala Grimalt, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: ABR Producción Contemporánea, SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 June 2012 (Case R 1622/2010-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between ABR Producción Contemporánea, SL and Grupo T Diffusión, SA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/26

Order of the General Court of 18 February 2013 — Klizli v Council

(Case T-336/12) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Syria - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 108/68

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Yousef Klizli (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: Z. Garkova-Lyutskanova, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2012/256/CFSP of 14 May 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2012 L 126, p. 9) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 410/2012 of 14 May 2012 implementing Article 32(1) of Regulation No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2012 L 126, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/27

Order of the General Court of 19 February 2013 — Beninca v Commission

(Case T-418/12) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Express decision adopted after the action had been brought - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 108/69

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Jürgen Beninca (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: C. Zschocke, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision of 27 July 2012 refusing access to a document.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Jürgen Beninca.

(1) OJ C 366, 24.11.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/23

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Hübner v OHIM — Silesia Gerhard Hanke (Original silecia Kieselsäure-Gel)

(Case T-211/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 336/49

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Anton Hübner GmBH & Co KG (Ehrenkirchen, Germany) (represented: initially by A. Kirchgäßner and subsequently by R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Silesia Gerhard Hanke GmBH & Co KG (Norf, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Krieger, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 March 2012 (Case R 351/2011-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Silesia Gerhard Hanke GmBH & Co KG and Anton Hübner GmBH & Co KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, to bear half of the defendant’s costs.

(1) OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/81

Order of the General Court of 15 May 2013 — Post Invest Europe Sàrl v European Commission

(Case T-413/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid granted by the Belgian authorities to De Post-La Poste (now bpost) - Compensation for public service costs - Decision declaring the aid in part incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility - Offers of further evidence)

2013/C 225/181

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Post Invest Europe Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: B. van de Walle de Ghelcke and T. Franchoo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and D. Grespan, Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Articles 2 and 5 to 7 of Commission Decision 2012/321/EU of 25 January 2012 on the measure SA.14588 (C-20/09) implemented by Belgium in favour of De Post-La Poste (now bpost) (OJ 2012 L 170, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of Belgium.

3. Post Invest Europe Sàrl shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 343, 10.11.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/32

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2013 — von Storch and Others v ECB

(Case T-492/12) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Decisions adopted by the ECB - Technical characteristics relating to Eurosystem Outright Monetary Transactions - Measures seeking to maintain the availability of collateral - Temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral - Not directly affected - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 45/53

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Sven A. von Storch and Others (Berlin, Germany) and the 5 216 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Kerber and B. von Storch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: C. Kroppenstedt and G. Gruber, Agents, assisted by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment, primarily, of the ECB’s decision of 6 September 2012 concerning a certain number of technical characteristics relating to Eurosystem Outright Monetary Transactions on the secondary sovereign debt markets, secondly, of the decision of the ECB of 6 September 2012 adopting additional measures intended to maintain the availability of collateral for counterparties in order to maintain their access to Eurosystem transactions to provide liquidity and, in the alternative, of Guideline 2012/641/EU of the ECB of 10 October 2012 amending Guideline ECB/2012/18 on additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral (ECB/2012/23) (OJ L 284, p. 14).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Mr Sven von Storch and the 5 216 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the present order shall bear their own costs and are ordered to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.