ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/69

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 December 2012 — Arla Foods v OHIM — Artax (Lactofree)

(Case T-364/11) (1)

2013/C 26/136

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 252/31

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2013 — Marcuccio vCommission

(Case T-238/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Invalidity allowance - Payment of arrears - Default interest due - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2013/C 252/50

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italie) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party in the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 15 February 2011 in Case F-81/09 Marcuccio v Commission (not published in the ECR) seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 186, 25.6.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/25

Order of the General Court of 21 February 2013 — Marucccio v Commission

(Case T-85/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Social security - Serious illness - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Commission decision refusing to reimburse medical expenses incurred by the appellant at the rate of 100 % - Obligation to state reasons - Article 72 of the Staff Regulations - Criteria adopted by the medical council - Opinion of the medical officer produced during the proceedings - Competence of the head of the settlements office - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2013/C 108/66

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 23 November 2010 in Case F-65/09 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio is to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/32

Order of the General Court of 12 February 2014 — Cofra v OHIM — O2 (can do)

(Joined Cases T-162/11 and T-163/11) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 112/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Cofra Holding (Zug, Switzerland) (represented initially by: K.-U. Jonas and J. Bogatz, and subsequently by M. Viefhues, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: K. Klüpfel, and subsequently by A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: O2 Holdings Ltd (Slough, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Müller and F. Fottner, lawyers)

Re:

Two actions brought against two decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2011 (Cases R 242/2009-4 and R 246/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between ALDEMA AG and O2 Holdings Ltd, on the one hand, and between C&A Mode KG and O2 Holdings Ltd, on the other.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the actions.

2. The applicant and the intervener are ordered to pay their own costs and each shall pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/12

Order of the General Court of 8 October 2013 — Michail v Commission

(Case T-597/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Appeal clearly unfounded)

2013/C 359/21

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellant: Christos Michail (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Meïdanis, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero, acting as Agents, assisted by E. Bourtzalas and E. Antypas, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 September 2011 in case F-100/09 Michail v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking that that judgment be set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed;

2. Christos Michail will bear his own costs and will pay those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal.

(1) OJ C 39, 11.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/38

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2014 — Kyocera Mita Europe v Commission

(Case T-35/11) (1)

((Actions for annulment - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff and statistical nomenclature - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff subheadings - Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 409/55

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Kyocera Mita Europe BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: P. De Baere and P. Muñiz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and L. Keppenne, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment in part of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 of 5 October 2010 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2010 L 284, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. It is not necessary to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Konica Minolta Business Solutions Europe GmbH and Olivetti SpA.

3. Kyocera Mita Europe BV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 194/37

Order of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Al-Aqsa v Council

(Case T-503/11) (1)

2014/C 194/49

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Biogas Nord v Commission

(Case T-628/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/69)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Biogas Nord AG (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: C. Birkemeyer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Biogas Nord AG;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 42/24

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2017 — Staelen v Ombudsman

(Case T-217/11 REV) (1)

((Non-contractual liability - Application for revision - Consequences of a subsequent judgment of the Court of Justice partially setting aside a judgment of the General Court - No new facts - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 042/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Claire Staelen (Bridel, Luxembourg) (represented by: V. Olona, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Ombudsman (represented by: initially G. Grill, then L. Papadias, acting as Agents, and A. Duron and D. Waelbroeck, lawyers)

Re:

Application for revision of the judgment of 29 April 2015, Staelen v Ombudsman (T-217/11, EU:T:2015:238)

Operative part of the order

1. The application for revision is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Ms Claire Staelen is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/10

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Chico’s Brands Investments v OHIM — Artsana (CHICO’S)

(Case T-83/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 273/17

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chico’s Brands Investments, Inc. (Fort Myers, United States) (represented by: T. Holman, solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Artsana SpA (Grandate, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 October 2011 (Case R 2084/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Artsana SpA and Chico’s Brands Investments, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 373/13

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2012 — Kingdom of Spain v Commission

(Case T-96/12) (1)

2012/C 373/24

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 355/27

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 September 2012 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-52/12 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Compensation payments made in 2008 and 2009 by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation of the decision - Prima facie case - Urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2012/C 355/57

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: I. Khalkias and S. Papaïoannou, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and S. Thomas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision 2012/157/EU of 7 December 2011 concerning compensation payments made by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) for the years 2008 and 2009 (OJ 2012 L 78, p. 21).

Operative part of the order

1. The operation of Commission Decision 2012/157/EU of 7 December 2011 concerning compensation payments made by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) in 2008 and 2009 is suspended in so far as that decision obliges the Hellenic Republic to recover the sums paid from the beneficiaries.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/26

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 — Icelandic Group UK v Commission

(Case T-35/12) (1)

2013/C 32/45

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/48

Order of the General Court of 20 November 2012 — Shahid Beheshti University v Council

(Case T-120/12) (1)

(Annulment action - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation - Freezing funds - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Lateness - Inadmissible)

2013/C 26/97

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Shahid Beheshti University (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: J.-M Thouvenin, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Liudvinaviciute Cordeiro and A. Varnav, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Decision 2011/299/CFSP of 23 May 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 65), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2011 of 23 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 26), Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, 71), Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11), as far as those acts concern the applicant, and the decision contained in the Council’s letter sent to the applicant on 5 December 2011.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Shahid Behesti University is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/27

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 January 2013 — Slovenia v Commission

(Case T-507/12 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery from the recipient - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2013/C 108/70

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: V. Klemenc and A. Grum, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, D. Kukovec and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2012) 6345 final of 19 September 2012 on measures in favour of the undertaking ELAN d.o.o. [SA.26379 (C-13/2010) (ex NN 17/2010)].

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/26

Order of the General Court of 19 February 2013 — Provincie Groningen and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-15/12 and T-16/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Subsidy scheme for the acquisition of natural areas for environmental protection - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 108/67

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Provincie Groningen (Netherlands) and the eleven other applicants whose names are mentioned in the annex to the order (represented by: P. Kuypers and N. van Nuland, lawyers) (Case T-15/12); Stichting Het Groninger Landschap (Haren, Netherlands) and the twelve other applicants whose names are mentioned in the annex to the order (represented by: P. Kuypers and N. van Nuland) (Case T-16/12)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and P.J. Loewenthal, Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicants: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze, K. Petersen and A. Wiedmann, Agents); and the Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, J. Langer and M. Bulterman, Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission decision C(2011) 4945 final of 13 July 2011 concerning the State aid granted by the Netherlands in the form of subsidies applicable to the acquisition of land for environmental protection (N 308/2010 — Netherlands).

Operative part of the order

1. The actions are dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene by Landgoed Den Alerdinck II, Vereniging Gelijkberechtiging Grondbezitters, Landgoed Welna and Heerlijkheid Mariënwaerdt.

3. Provincie Groningen, Provincie Friesland, Provincie Drenthe, Provincie Overijssel, Provincie Gelderland, Provincie Flevoland, Provincie Utrecht, Provincie Noord-Holland, Provincie Zuid-Holland, Provincie Zeeland, Provincie Noord-Brabant, Provincie Limburg, Stichting Het Groninger Landschap, It Fryske Gea, Stichting Het Drentse Landschap, Stichting Landschap Overijssel, Stichting Het Geldersch Landschap, Stichting Flevo-landschap, Stichting Het Utrechts Landschap, Stichting Landschap Noord-Holland, Stichting Het Zuid-Hollands Landschap, Stichting Het Zeeuwse Landschap, Stichting Het Noordbrabants Landschap, Stichting Het Limburgs Landschap and Vereniging tot behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear their own costs.

5. Landgoed Den Alerdinck II, Vereniging Gelijkberechtiging Grondbezitters, Landgoed Welna and Heerlijkheid Mariënwaerdt, applicants for leave to intervene, shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/24

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2013 — Planet v Commission

(Case T-489/12) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration - Contracts relating to Ontogov, FIT and RACWeb projects - Eligible costs - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissible)

2013/C 336/51

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and B. Conte, agents, and by S. Drakakakis, lawyer)

Re:

Action based on Article 272 TFEU and the first paragraph of Article 340 TFEU seeking a declaration that, first, the refusal by the Commission to allow as eligible costs certain sums paid in advance of completion of the contracts ‘Ontology enabled E-Gov Service Configuration (ONTOGOV)’, ‘Fostering self-adaptive e-government service improvement using semantic technologies (FIT)’ and ‘Risk Assessment for Customs in Western Balkans (RACWeb)’, concluded as part of the Sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002-2006), is an infringement by the Commission of its contractual obligations and, secondly, that those sums are eligible costs and ought not to be repaid.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/81

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2013 — Cosma Moden v OHMI — s.Oliver Bernd Freier (COSMA)

(Case T-399/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 225/180

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Cosma Moden GmbH & Co. KG (Emsdetten, Germany) (represented by: J. Meyer, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: s.Oliver Bernd Freier GmbH & Co. KG (Rottendorf, Germany) (represented by: S. Körber and B. Bleifeld, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 July 2012 (Case R 2010/2010-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Cosma Moden GmbH & Co. KG and s.Oliver Bernd Freier & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and each shall pay half of the costs of the defendant.

(1) OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/31

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2013 — Pips v OHIM — s.Oliver Bernd Freier (ISABELLA OLIVER)

(Case T-38/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2014/C 45/51

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pips BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: J. van den Berg, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: s.Oliver Bernd Freier GmbH & Co. KG (Rottendorf, Germany) (represented by: S. Körber and D. Kämper, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 October 2011 (Case R 2420/2010-1), concerning opposition proceedings between s.Oliver Bernd Freier GmbH & Co. KG and Pips BV.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The intervener shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 367/28

Order of the General Court of 24 October 2013 — Stromberg Menswear v OHIM — Leketoy Stormberg Inter (STORMBERG)

(Case T-451/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Earlier Community word mark STORMBERG - Surrender of the disputed mark by the proprietor - Decision to close the revocation proceedings - Request for restitutio in integrum - Obligation to state reasons - Articles 58(1), 76(1) and 81(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 367/50

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Stromberg Menswear Ltd (Leeds, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Tsoutsanis, lawyer, and C. Tulley, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Leketoy Stormberg Inter AS (Kristiansand S, Norway) (represented initially by T. Mølsgaard, and subsequently by J. Løje, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 August 2012 (Case R 389/2012-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Stromberg Menswear Ltd and Leketoy Stormberg Inter AS.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Stromberg Menswear Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 194/38

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2014 — Visa Europe v Commission

(Case T-447/12) (1)

2014/C 194/51

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.