ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/16

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2014 — Productos Derivados del Acero v Commission

(Case T-388/10) (1)

((Action for annulment - Representation of the parties - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 056/21)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Productos Derivados del Acero, SA (Catarroja, Spain) (represented initially by M. Escuder Tella, F. Palau-Ramírez and J. Viciano Pastor, lawyers, subsequently by M. Escuder Tella and J. Viciano Pastor, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, F. Castilla Contreras and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel), amended by Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 and Commission Decision C (2011) 2269 final of 4 April 2011.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Productos Derivados del Acero, SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

(1) OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/22

Order of the General Court of 6 July 2011 — Petroci v Council

(Case T-160/11) (1)

(Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Removal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 282/45

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société nationale d'opérations pétrolières de la Cote d’Ivoire Holding (Petroci Holding) (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and A. Vitro, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36), and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), in so far as those acts introduce restrictive measures which adversely affect the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate.

2. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the application of the European Commission for leave to intervene

(1) OJ C 139 of 7.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 219/17

Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2011 — GRP Security v Court of Auditors

(Case T-87/11 R)

(Interim measures - Public service contracts - Finding that there were irregularities in certain documents provided by the successful tenderer - Decisions imposing administrative sanctions on the successful tenderer and unilateral termination of the contract - Application for suspension of the operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 219/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: GRP Security (Bretrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Osch, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Steiner and J. Vermer, lawyers)

Re:

Suspension of the operation of the decisions of the Court of Auditors of 14 January 2011 by which, first, the Court of Auditors claimed payment from the applicant of damages in the amount of EUR 16 000 and reserved the right to claim further amounts by way of damages and, secondly, imposed on the applicant the administrative penalty of exclusion from contracts and subsidies financed by the budget of the European Union for a provisional period of three months.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/35

Order of the judge of the General Court hearing applications for interim measures of 3 October 2011 — Qualitest FZE v Council

(Case T-421/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 347/63

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Qualitest FZE (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: M. Catrain González, lawyer, E. Wright and H. Zhu, Barristers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Marhic and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2011 of 23 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 26) and of Council Decision 2011/299/CFSP of 23 May 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 65), in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/34

Order of the President of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Safa Nicu Sepahan v Council

(Case T-384/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 347/61

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. (Isfahan, Iran) (represented by: A. Bahrami, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: A. Vitro and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, and subsequently by: R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro and I. Gurov, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures, including suspension of operation of point 19 of Table B of Annex I to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2011 of 23 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 26), in so far as the list of persons and entities whose funds and economic resources are frozen includes an entity designated under the name of ‘Safa Nicu’.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 58/10

Order of the General Court of 11 January 2012 — Ben Ali v Council

(Case T-301/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in the light of the situation in Tunisia - Action for annulment - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Out of time - No force majeure - No excusable error - Application for alteration of the contested measure - Claim for compensation - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 58/18

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali (Tunis, Tunisia) (represented by: A. de Saint Remy, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by A. Vitro and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, and subsequently by R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro and M. Bishop, Agents)

Re:

First, action for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 of 4 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2011 L 31, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicant and, second, an application seeking an order for the Council to adopt certain derogations to the freezing of funds imposed by the regulation and a claim for damages for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The order is dismissed.

2. Mr Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. There is no need to give a ruling on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/15

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Preparados Alimenticios del Sur v Commission

(Case T-402/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Claim for remission of import duties of some food products - Decision to refer the documents in the case to the national authorities - Applications for interim measures - Inadmissibility - No urgency)

2012/C 39/30

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant(s): Preparados Alimenticios del Sur, SL (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: I. Acero Campos, lawyer)

Defendant(s): European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and L. Bouyon, Agents)

Re:

Applications for interim measures, including suspension of operation of the letter of the Commission of 29 June 2011 informing the applicant of the reference to the Spanish authorities of the documents in the case relating to its claim for remission of import duties, so that those authorities can rule on that claim.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/20

Order of the General Court of 2 May 2012 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-339/11) (1)

2012/C 184/40

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/24

Order of the General Court of 25 January 2012 — MasterCard and Others v European Commission

(Case T-330/11) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a study of the costs and benefits to merchants of accepting different payment methods - Documents drawn up by a third party - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Express decision adopted after the bringing of the action - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 89/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: MasterCard Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States), MasterCard International, Inc. (Wilmington), MasterCard Europe (Waterloo, Belgium) (represented by: B. Amory, V. Brophy and S. McInnes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission to refuse the applicants access to certain documents drawn up by a third party relating to a study of the ‘costs and benefits to merchants of accepting different payment methods’

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/9

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2012 — Ghreiwati v Council

(Case T-543/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 273/15

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Emad Ghreiwati (Al Maliki, Syria) (represented by: P.-F. Gaborit, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-M. Joséphidès and B. Driessen, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by S. Bartelt and E. Cujo, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of Council Regulation (EU) No 878/2011 of 2 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 1), and of Council Decision 2011/522/CFSP of 2 September 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 16) and, second, of Council Regulation (EU) No 950/2011 of 23 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 247, p. 3), and of Council Decision 2011/628/CFSP of 23 September 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 247, p. 17), in so far as the applicant is named in the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay the costs;

3. The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 217/24

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Eurofer v Commission

(Case T-381/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Free allocation of greenhouse gas emission quotas from 2013 - Commission decision determining the product benchmark to be applied for the calculation of the allocation of emission quotas - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 of the TFEU - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory instrument containing implementation measures - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 217/50

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Europäischer Wirtschaftsverband der Eisen- und Stahlindustrie (Eurofer) ASBL (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and C. Dittrich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wilms, K. Herrmann and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 130, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to rule on the application for leave to intervene of Euroalliages.

3. Europäischer Wirtschaftsverband der Eisen- und Stahlindustrie (Eurofer) ASBL is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

(1) OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/46

Order of the General Court of 19 October 2012 — Ellinika Nafpigeia and Hoern v Commission

(Case T-466/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Shipbuilding - Aid granted by the Greek authorities to a shipyard - Measures implementing the Commission’s decision finding that the aid is incompatible with the common market and ordering that it be repaid - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 26/91

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Ellinika Nafpigeia AE (Skaramagka, Greece), and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH (Kiel, Germany) (represented by: K Chrysogonos and A. Mitsis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission letter C(2010) 8274 final of 1 December 2010 relating to ‘State aid case CR 16/2004 — Implementation of the negative Decision with recovery concerning State aid in favour of [the company Ellinika Nafpigeia AE] — Invocation by Greece of Article 346 paragraph 1 (b) TFEU and proceedings under Article 348 paragraph 1 TFEU’, as supplemented by the documents and other material on the file of which the applicants became partially aware in June 2011.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application by Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas for leave to intervene.

3. Ellinika Nafpigeia AE and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The applicant for leave to intervene, Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas, shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/10

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2012 — Technion and Technion Research & Development Foundation v Commission

(Case T-657/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities - Letter notifying the applicant of the Commission’s intention to recover the adjusted sums pursuant to a research financing contract - Acts inseparable from the contract - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 319/18

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Technion — Israel Institute of Technology (Haifa, Israel) and Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd (Haifa) (represented by: D. Grisay and D. Piccininno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Calciu and F. Moro, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 19 October 2011 notifying the applicant of the issuing of a debit note for the reimbursement of the sum of EUR 97 106,72, corresponding to the amount of the adjusted sums for contract No 034984 (Mosaica), following the conclusions of the financial audit concerning, inter alia, that contract, concluded under the sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European research area and to innovation (2002 — 2006)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Technion — Israel Institute of Technology and Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/17

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 — Evonik Industries v OHIM Bornemann (EVONIK)

(Case T-390/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 32/27

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Evonik Industries (Essen, Germany) (represented by: J. Albrecht, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann and R. Pethke, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Johann Heinrich Bornemann GmbH — Geschäftsbereich Kunststofftechnik Obernkirchen (Obernkirchen, Germany) (represented by: A. Oldekop, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 April 2011 (Case R 1802/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Johann Heinrich Bornemann GmbH — Geschäftsbereich Kunststofftechnik Obernkirchen and Evonik Industries AG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/47

Order of the General Court of 20 November 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-491/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Duration of the procedure for recognising partial permanent invalidity - Harm allegedly suffered by the appellant - Reimbursement of avoidable costs - Action at first instance dismissed as manifestly devoid of any basis in law - Article 94(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal)

2013/C 26/92

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. Del Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 30 June 2011 in Case F-14/10 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 189/23

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Ethniko kai Kapodistriako Panepistimio Athinon v ECDC

(Case T-577/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision to the ECDC of systematic review and expert guidance services on the public health effectiveness of molecular typing of viral pathogens - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 189/47

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Ethniko kai Kapodistriako Panepistimio Athinon (Athens, Greece) (represented by: S. Garipis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by: R. Trott, Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and E. Bourtzalas)

Re:

Application for annulment of the ECDC’s decision of 25 August 2011 rejecting the bid submitted by the applicant in the tendering procedure PROC/2001/041 concerning the provision of systematic review and expert guidance services on the public health effectiveness of molecular typing of viral pathogens (OJ 2011/S 109-179084).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed;

2. Ethniko kai Kapodistriako Panepistimio Athinon shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 86/29

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2013 — Dimension Data Belgium v Parliament

(Case T-650/11) (1)

2013/C 86/49

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/30

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2013 — Government of Aragón and Others v Council

(Case T-150/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Decision concerning aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines - Partial annulment - Non-severability - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 45/48

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Government of Aragón (Spain); Principado de Asturias (Spain); and Junta de Castilla y León (represented by: C. Fernández Vicién, I. Moreno-Tapia Rivas, E. Echeverría Álvarez and M. López Garrido, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Lo Monaco and F. Florindo Gijón, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, L. Flynn and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Council Decision 2010/787/EU of 10 December 2010 on State aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines (OJ 2010 L 336, p. 24).

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Government of Aragón (Spain), the Principado de Asturias (Spain) and the Junta de Castilla y León (Spain) are ordered to bear their own costs and, in addition, to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.