ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/19

Order of the General Court of 1 September 2011 — Maftah v Commission

(Case T-101/09) (1)

(Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Out of time - No force majeure - No excusable error - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 319/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Elmabruk Maftah (South Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom) (represented by: E. Grieves, Barrister, and A. McMurdie, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Paasivirta and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Intervening party on behalf of the defendant: Council of the European Union, represented by R. Szostak, G. Étienne, M.-M. Josephides and E. Finnegan, Agents

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1330/2008 of 22 December 2008 amending for the 103rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban (OJ 2008 L 345, p. 60), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible;

2. Mr Elmabruk Maftah shall bear his own costs and pay the costs of the European Commission;

3. The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.
Order of the General Court of 6 September 2012 — Bredenkamp and Others v Commission

(Case T-145/09) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted having regard to the situation in Zimbabwe - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

(2012/C 331/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: John Arnold Bredenkamp (Harare, Zimbabwe) and the other applicants whose names appear on the annex to this order (represented by: D. Vaughan QC, P. Moser, Barrister, and R. Khan, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. van Nuffel, T. Scharf and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defandant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by E. Jenkinson, I. Rao and F. Penlington and subsequently by E. Jenkinson, I. Rao and C. Murrell, acting as Agents, and D. Beard QC, and by the Council of the European Union (represented by M. Bishop and R. Szostak, acting as Agents)

Re:

ACTION for the annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 77/2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe (OJ 2009 L 23, p. 5), as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 173/2010 of 25 February 2010 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe (OJ 2010 L 51, p. 13) in so far as it concerns the applicants.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The European Commission shall bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by John Arnold Bredenkamp, Alpha International (PVT) Ltd, Breco (Asia Pacific) Ltd, Breco (Eastern Europe) Ltd, Breco (South Africa) Ltd, Breco (UK) Ltd, Breco Group, Breco International, Breco Nominees Ltd, Breco Services Ltd, Corybantes Ltd, Echo Delta Holdings, Masters International Ltd, Piedmont (UK) Ltd, Raceview Enterprises, Scottlee Holdings (PVT) Ltd, Scottlee Resorts Ltd, Timpani Exports Ltd and Tremalt Ltd.

3. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Council of the European Union shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/19

Order of the General Court of 27 April 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Club de Golf Peralada (WINE SPA)

(Case T-183/09) (1)

2012/C 184/36

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/71

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2014 — BSA v OHIM — Loblaws (PRÉSIDENT)

(Case T-420/09) (1)

2014/C 315/116

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/20

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — France v Commission

(Case T-485/09) (1)

2014/C 15/31

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 195/19

Order of the General Court of 26 May 2010 — Noko Ngele v Commission

(Case T-15/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 195/31

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mariyus Noko Ngele (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Sabakunzi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes, acting as Agent)

Re:

Essentially, an application to have the activity of the ‘Centre pour le développement de l’entreprise (CDE)’ in Belgium declared illegitimate, to prevent the Commission and its agents from entering into financial relations with the CDE or from recognising the legitimacy of the CDE and to order the Commission to pay the applicant a sum of money if the Commission recognises the legitimacy of that body

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 258/30

Corrigendum to the notice in the Official Journal in Case T-527/10

( Official Journal of the European Union C 227 of 28 July 2012, p. 20 )

2012/C 258/55

The OJ notice in Case T-527/10 Google v OHIM — G-mail (GMail) should read as follows:

Order of the General Court of 6 June 2012 — Google v OHIM — G-mail (GMail) (Case T-527/10) (1) (Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate) 2012/C 258/55 Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Google, Inc. (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers) Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: G-mail GmbH (Los Angeles, United States) (represented by: S. Eble, lawyer) Re: Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2010 (Case R 342/2010-4) in relation to opposition proceedings between Giersch Ventures LLC and Google, Inc. Operative part of the order 1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action. 2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 246/36

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2010 — H v Council and Others

(Case T-271/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - National official seconded to the European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Decision to redeploy and downgrade - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Admissibility - Lack of urgency)

2010/C 246/62

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: H (Catania, Italy) (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Velardo, lawyers)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and G. Marhic, acting as Agents) and European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of 7 April 2010 of the Head of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina having the effect of downgrading and redeploying the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The Council of the European Union and the European Commission are considered to be the only defendants.

2. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 195/17

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2010 — CBI and ABISP v Commission

(Case T-128/08 and Case T-241/08) (1)

(State aid - Subsidies granted to public hospitals by the Belgian authorities - Service of general economic interest - Complaint - Alleged decision to take no further action on the complaint - Subsequent adoption of a decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the common market - No need to adjudicate)

2010/C 195/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Coordination bruxelloise d’institutions sociales et de santé (CBI) (Brussels, Belgium); and Association bruxelloise des institutions de soins privées (ABISP) (Brussels) (represented by: D. Waelbroeck, lawyer, and D. Slater, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, J.-P. Keppenne and B. Stromsky, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of an alleged Commission decision, resulting from its letters of 10 January and 10 April 2008, not to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC and to take no further action on the applicants’ complaint concerning alleged State aid granted by the Belgian authorities in connection with the financing of public hospitals of the IRIS network (Interhospitalière régionale des infrastructures de soins) in the Brussels-Capital Region (Belgium).

Operative part of the order

1. Case T-128/08 and Case T-241/08 shall be joined for the purposes of this order.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on these actions.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Commune de Saint-Gilles (Belgium), Commune d’Etterbeek (Belgium), Commune d’Ixelles (Belgium), Commune d’Anderlecht (Belgium), Brussels-Capital Region (Belgium), City of Brussels (Belgium), or the Republic of Finland.

4. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/35

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2010 — De Lucia v OHIM — Galbani (De Lucia La natura pratica del gusto)

(Case T-2/10) (1)

2011/C 55/64

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/58

Order of the General Court of 22 October 2010 — Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten v Commission

(Case T-151/10) (1)

()

2010/C 346/115

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 145/28

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO)

(Case T-175/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 145/47

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 February 2010 (Case R 1116/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign FERTILITYINVIVO as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Milux Holding SA is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 113/20

Order of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — Rautaruukki v OHIM — Vigil Pérez (MONTERREY)

(Case T-217/10) (1)

2011/C 113/42

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 211/24

Order of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — United Kingdom v Commission

(Case T-115/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Decision 2010/45/EU - List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region - Measure not open to challenge - Measure merely confirmatory - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 211/54

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Ossowski, acting as Agent, and by D. Wyatt QC and M. Wood, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Boelaert and D. Recchia, Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2010/45/EU of 22 December 2009 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a third updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2010 L 30, p. 322) to the extent that it lists the site called ‘Estrecho oriental’ (under reference ES6120032) as a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall pay the costs.

3. There is no need to rule on the Kingdom of Spain’s application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/20

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-366/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Non-contractual liability - Reimbursement of recoverable costs - Exception for parallel proceedings - Procedural defects - Rights of the defence - Appeal partly manifestly inadmissible and partly manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 282/39

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Curral and C. Berardis-Kayser, agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 22 June 2010 in Case F-78/09 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking to annul that order.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed;

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio is to bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 238/36

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2011 — Endesa and Endesa Generación v Commission

(Case T-490/10) (1)

2011/C 238/64

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 340/21

Order of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — PPG and SNF v ECHA

(Case T-1/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - REACH - Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 340/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG) (Brussels, Belgium) and SNF SAS (Andrézieux-Bouthéon, France) (represented initially by: K. Van Maldegem, P. Sellar and R. Cana, and subsequently by: K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä and W. Broere, acting as Agents, and J. Stuyck, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, J. Langer, Y. de Vries and M. de Ree, acting as Agents; and European Commission (represented initially by: P. Oliver and G. Wilms, and subsequently by: P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of ECHA of 7 December 2009 identifying acrylamide (EC No 201-173-7) as a substance meeting the criteria set out in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1) in accordance with Article 59 of Regulation 1907/2006

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG) and SNF SAS shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

3. SNF shall bear the costs relating to the interim proceedings.

4. The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 331/20

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission

(Case T-84/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - ERDF - Decision incorporating reduction of financial assistance - Regional entity - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 331/39

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Regione Puglia (Bari, Italy) (represented by: F. Brunelli and A. Aloia, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Cattabriga and A. Steiblytė, agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, incorporating a reduction in the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) assistance granted in application of Commission Decision C(2000) 2349 of 8 August 2000, incorporating approval of the operational programme POR Puglia for the period 2000-2006, on the basis of Objective No 1.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Regione Puglia will bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs related to the interlocutory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 126/16

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2012 — Schneider España de Informática, SA v European Commission

(Case T-153/10) (1)

(Customs union - Importation of colour television sets assembled in Turkey - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Application for waiver of post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties and for remission of those duties - Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Commission decision rejecting that application - Annulment by the national court of decisions taken by national authorities ordering post-clearance entry of import duties in the accounts - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 126/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Schneider España de Informática, SA (Torrejón de Ardoz (Spain)) (represented by: P. De Baere and P. Muñiz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and L. Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 22 final of 18 January 2010 finding that post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties is justified and that remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case (Case REM 02/08),

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/17

Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission

(Case T-449/10) (1)

(Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 6/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom); European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E) (Brussels, Belgium); European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels); and BirdLife International (Brussels) (represented by: S. Hockman QC, and by P. Kirch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and C. ten Dam, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission of 20 July 2010 refusing access to certain documents relating to drafts of a report on the Global Trade and Environmental Impact Study of the Biofuels Mandate of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by ClientEarth, the European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E), the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) and BirdLife International.

(1) OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 355/37

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2012 — Deutsche Telekom v OHIM TeliaSonera Denmark (Nuance de magenta)

(Case T-583/10) (1)

2012/C 355/78

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 55, 19.2.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 151/33

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — X Technology Swiss v OHIM — Brawn (X-Undergear)

(Case T-581/10) (1)

2012/C 151/59

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 26.2.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/10

Order of the General Court of 23 January 2014 — Confederación de Cooperativas Agrarias de España and CEPES v Commission

(Case T-156/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Spanish legislation laying down measures in favour of agricultural cooperatives following the fuel price increase - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Professional associations - Lack of individual concern - No recovery - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 78/20

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Confederación de Cooperativas Agrarias de España (Madrid, Spain), and Confederación Empresarial Española de la Economía Social (CEPES) (Madrid) (represented by: M. Araujo Boyd and M. Muñoz de Juan, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Asociación de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (Aeescam) (represented by: R. Ortega Bueno and M. Delgado Echevarría, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul Commission decision 2010/473/EU of 15 December 2009 relating to measures to support agriculture implemented by Spain following the fuel price increase (OJ 2010 L 235, p.1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Confederación de Cooperativas Agrarias de España and the Confederación Empresarial Española de la Economía Social (CEPES) shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Asociación de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (Aeescam) shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/37

Order of the General Court of 18 February 2013 — Clasado v Commission

(Case T-322/10) (1)

2013/C 108/87

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 389/65

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — Greenwood Houseware (Zhuhai) and Others v Council

(Case T-191/10) (1)

(2015/C 389/73)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.