ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Case C-481/17: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo — Bulgaria) — Nikolay Yanchev v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Aid scheme authorised by the European Commission — Investment aid in the agricultural sector — Tax exemption — Tax relief on corporation tax — Conditions — Refusal to grant individual aid under that aid scheme)

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo — Bulgaria) — Nikolay Yanchev v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

(Case C-481/17) ( 1 )

‛(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Aid scheme authorised by the European Commission — Investment aid in the agricultural sector — Tax exemption — Tax relief on corporation tax — Conditions — Refusal to grant individual aid under that aid scheme)’

Referring court

Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nikolay Yanchev

Defendant: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

Operative part of the order

Decision C(2011) 863 final of the Commission of 11 February 2011, concerning the award of State aid pursuant to Articles 107 TFEU and 108 TFEU and authorising State aid No 546/2010 of the Republic of Bulgaria for investment in agricultural holdings in the form of corporation tax relief, must be interpreted as not precluding that Member State from refusing the award of State aid under that scheme on the ground that the applicant does not meet a condition, laid down in national law, according to which no aid can be awarded to a taxpayer who has debts towards the State, notwithstanding the fact that that decision does not expressly lay down such a condition.

( 1 ) OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/2

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 2 de Cádiz — Spain) — Moisés Vadillo González v Alestis Aerospace SL

(Case C-252/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insufficient information regarding the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying why an answer to the questions referred is necessary - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 190/02)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 2 de Cádiz

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Moisés Vadillo González

Defendant: Alestis Aerospace SL

Intervener: Ministerio Fiscal

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Juzgado de lo Social No 2 de Cádiz (Social Court No 2, Cádiz, Spain), by decision of 8 May 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Proceedings brought by Gmalieva s.r.o. and Others

(Case C-79/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to provide services - Gambling services - Gambling monopoly in a Member State - National legislation prohibiting the operation of slot machines without prior authorisation from the administrative authorities)

(2018/C 399/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Gmalieva s.r.o., Celik KG, PBW GmbH, Antoaneta Claudia Gruber, Play For Me GmbH, Haydar Demir

Intervener: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich

Operative part of the order

It is for the referring court to determine, in the light of the guidance given by the Court of Justice inter alia in the judgment of 30 April 2014, Pfleger and Others (C-390/12, EU:C:2014:281), whether a national statutory monopoly scheme in respect of games of chance, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, is to be regarded as coherent, in the light of Article 56 TFEU et seq., where national judicial proceedings have established that:

— gambling addiction does not represent a societal problem justifying State intervention;

— the playing of prohibited games gives rise to police involvement in an administrative context and not to criminal offences;

— annual State income from games of chance exceeds EUR 500 million, being 0,4 % of the annual budget; and

— the advertising measures undertaken by licensees also seek principally to entice persons who have not previously played games of chance to do so.

(1) OJ C 178, 6.6.2017.
Case C-141/17: Order of the President of the Court of 1 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco — Spain) — José Luis Cabana Carballo v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS)

Order of the President of the Court of 1 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco — Spain) — José Luis Cabana Carballo v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS)

(Case C-141/17) ( 1 )

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.
Order of the President of the Court of 4 February 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium, supported by: Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Estonia, Ireland, Kingdom of Spain, French Republic, Italian Republic, Republic of Latvia, Republic of Lithuania, Hungary

(Case C-564/17) (1)

(2019/C 172/28)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 328, 13.11.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 16 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover

(Case C-593/17) (1)

(2019/C 54/22)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 14 June 2018 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, intervener: French Republic

(Case C-20/18) (1)

(2018/C 341/18)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.
Case C-88/18: Order of the President of the Court of 29 May 2018 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Order of the President of the Court of 29 May 2018 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-88/18) ( 1 )

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 26 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — KAMU Passenger & IT Services GmbH v Türk Hava Yollari A.O. — T.H.Y. Turkish Airlines

(Case C-289/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/30)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.
Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — FR v Ministero dell’interno — Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale presso la Prefettura U.T.G. di Milano

(Case C-422/18 PPU) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Area of freedom, security and justice - Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection - Directive 2013/32/EU - Article 46 - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 18, Article 19(2) and Article 47 - Right to an effective remedy - Decision rejecting an application for international protection - National legislation providing for a second level of jurisdiction - Automatic suspensory effect limited to the action at first instance))

(2018/C 455/27)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Milano

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: FR

Defendant: Ministero dell’interno — Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale presso la Prefettura U.T.G. di Milano

Intervening party: Pubblico Ministero

Operative part of the order

European Union law, in particular the provisions of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for an appeal procedure against a first-instance judgment confirming a decision of the competent administrative authority which rejects an application for international protection, without granting it automatic suspensory effect, but which allows the court which has handed down that judgment to order, upon application by the person concerned, the suspension of its enforcement, after having assessed whether or not the grounds raised in the appeal brought against that judgment are well founded but not whether or not there is a risk of serious and irreparable damage for that applicant as a result of the enforcement of that judgment.

(1) OJ C 311, 3.9.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — ZW v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-498/18) (1)

(2019/C 172/34)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 16 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Albacete — Spain) — The borrowers v Globalcaja, S.A.

(Case C-617/18) (1)

(2019/C 112/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Gerona — Spain) — OD v Ryanair

(C-646/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Determination of the court having jurisdiction to hear an application for compensation in respect of a delayed flight - Article 26 - Implied prorogation - Requirement that the defendant enter an appearance)

(2019/C 280/14)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Gerona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: OD

Defendant: Ryanair D.A.C.

Operative part of the order

Article 26(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply in a case, such as that in the main proceedings, where the defendant has not submitted observations and has not appeared.

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 — Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament

(Case C-330/18) (1)

(Appeal - European Parliament - Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid)

(2019/C 220/18)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

2. Bruno Gollnisch is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 24 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pesti Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — PannonHitel Pénzügyi Zrt. v WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft.

(Case C-476/18) (1)

(2020/C 10/36)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Kamenz — Germany) — MC v ND

(Case C-827/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Area of freedom, security and justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Lugano II Convention - Article 22(1) - Proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property - Restitution of the proceeds from the rental of a property before the transfer of ownership)

(2019/C 288/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Kamenz

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MC

Defendant: ND

Operative part of the order

Article 22(1), first subparagraph, of the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, signed on 30 October 2007, the conclusion of which was approved on behalf of the European Community by Council Decision 2009/430/EC of 27 November 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that proceedings brought by the purchaser of immovable property, seeking the payment of a sum received by the vendor in respect of rent paid by a third party, where that purchaser, although he had taken possession of that property at the time of the payment of that sum, was not yet the owner in law of that property, in accordance with the applicable national legislation, do not constitute proceedings ‘which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property’ within the meaning of that provision.

(1) OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.
Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 1 October 2019 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against YX

(Case C-495/18) (1)

(2020/C 68/43)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance d’Aulnay-sous-Bois — France) — LC, MD v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd

(Case C-756/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 99 - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Long delay of a flight - Passengers’ right to compensation - Proof of the passenger’s presence for check-in - Reservation confirmed by the air carrier)

(2020/C 45/07)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal d’instance d’Aulnay-sous-Bois

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LC, MD

Defendants: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd

Operative part of the order

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of du 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 and, in particular, Article 3(2)(a) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that passengers on a flight with a delay of 3 hours or more on arrival who have a confirmed reservation on that flight cannot be denied compensation under that regulation solely on the ground that, upon claiming compensation, they failed to prove that they were present for check-in for that flight, in particular by means of a boarding card, unless it can be established that those passengers were not transported on the delayed flight at issue, which is matter for the national court to determine.

(1) OJ C 54, 11.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 3 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Proceedings brought by YV, interested party Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa

(Case C-537/18) (1)

(2020/C 313/24)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 January 2020 — European Parliament v Erik Josefsson

(Case C-506/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Temporary staff - European Parliament - Termination of the contract - Agreement intended to resolve the dispute between the parties - Appeal which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 77/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Parliament (represented by: I. Ní Riagáin Düro and V. Montebello-Demogeot and by J. Steele, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Erik Josefsson (represented by: T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and M. Forgeois, avocats)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal.

2. The European Parliament and Mr Erik Josefsson shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Crocs Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Gifi Diffusion

(Case C-320/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Declaration of invalidity - Appeal which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate - Costs)

(2020/C 414/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Crocs Inc. (represented by: J. Guise and D. Knight, Solicitors, and H. Haouideg, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents), Gifi Diffusion (represented by: C. de Chassey, avocate)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal.

2. Crocs Inc. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the present appeal proceedings.

3. Gifi Diffusion shall bear its own costs incurred in these proceedings.

(1) OJ C 319, 10.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 28 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Toscana — Italy) — FW, GY v U.T.G. — Prefettura di Lucca

(Case C-726/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/30)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the l’Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — flightright GmbH/Eurowings GmbH

(C-180/19) (1)

(2020/C 19/44)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2019 (request for preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Modena — Italy) — Azienda USL di Modena v Comune di Sassuolo

(Case C-26/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - State aid - National health service - Exemption from property tax - Immovable property leased to a commercial company constituted with blended capital active in the health sector in competition with other healthcare establishments exclusively constituted with private capital)

(2019/C 288/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Modena

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Azienda USL di Modena

Defendant: Comune di Sassuolo

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Modena (Provincial Tax Court, Modena, Italy), by decision of 25 October 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DY

(Case C-139/19) (1)

(2020/C 77/53)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 19 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo no2 de Ourense — Spain) — FA v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS)

(Case C-240/19) (1)

(2020/C 68/47)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.
Order of the Court of 6 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureş — Romania) — MF v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA Paris Sucursala Bucureşti, Secapital Sàrl

(Case C-75/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Directive 93/13/EEC - Consumer contracts - Consumer credit - Enforcement proceedings - Time limit of 15 days from service of enforcement proceedings to raise the unfairness of a term)

(2020/C 161/18)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Specializat Mureş

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MF

Defendant: BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA Paris Sucursala Bucureşti, Secapital Sàrl

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as precluding a rule of national law by which a consumer who concluded a loan agreement with a credit institution and against whom that supplier initiated enforcement proceedings is time-barred, beyond a period of 15 days from service of the first documents in those proceedings, from relying on the existence unfair terms to defend those proceedings, even if under national law the consumer may bring an action for a finding of unfair terms which is not subject to any time limit, but the outcome of which has no bearing on the outcome of the enforcement proceedings, which may be binding on the consumer before the conclusion of the action for a finding of unfair terms.

(1) OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 15 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi — Spain) — Confederación Sindical Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi v Ayuntamiento de Arrigorriaga

(Case C-635/19) (1)

(2020/C 137/69)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.