ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Bonicelli v Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking

(Case T-520/20) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - 2019 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote - Replacement of the contested act in the course of the proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 53/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Tullio Bonicelli (Badalona, Spain) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (represented by: G. T. Poszler, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment, first, of the decision of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy of 24 October 2019 not to include the name of the applicant on the final list of officials promoted within the framework of the 2019 promotion exercise and, secondly, of its decision of 8 May 2020 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by Mr Tullio Bonicelli.

(1) OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 February 2021 — sprd.net v EUIPO — Shirtlabor (I love)

(Case T-19/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark I love - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Inapplicability of Article 16(1)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Admissibility of evidence - Article 97(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Impartiality - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 138/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: sprd.net AG (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: J. Hellenbrand, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Shirtlabor GmbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: O. Wallscheid, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 October 2019 (Case R 5/2019-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Shirtlabor and sprd.net.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. sprd.net AG shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. Shirtlabor GmbH shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2021 — Datenlotsen Informationssysteme v Commission

(Case T-34/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Software solutions for universities - Tax advantages and public funding - Formal investigation procedure - Decision classifying the implemented measures as existing aid - Lack of individual concern - No regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 79/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Lübbig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/391 of 20 September 2019 on the measure SA.34402 — 2015/C (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Germany for Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH (OJ 2020 L 74, p. 22).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The application by the Federal Republic of Germany for leave to intervene in support of the European Commission has become devoid of purpose.

3. Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — The Floow v Commission

(Case T-765/20 R)

(Application for interim relief - Grant agreement entered into as part of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) - Recovery of sums paid - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 206/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Floow Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Howard, Barrister, and J. Berry, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and L. André, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures, first, suspending the operation of Commission Decision C(2020) 8138 final of 17 November 2020 on the recovery of EUR 161 990,80 plus interest due from the applicant and, second, prohibiting the Commission from enforcing the contested decision or recovering money, or extending and extrapolating its findings to the non-audited period of the project or to other projects.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 February 2021 — Vulkano Research and Development v EUIPO — Ega (EGA Master)

(Case T-135/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 163/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Vulkano Research and Development, SL (Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain) (represented by: V. Wellens and C. Schellekens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Ega sp. z o.o. sp.k (Starogard Gdański, Poland) (represented by: K. Błach Morysińska and K. Dobrowolski, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 December 2019 (Case R 1038/2018-1) relating to cancellation proceedings between Ega and Vulkano Research and Development.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Vulkano Research and Development, SL and Ega sp. z o.o. sp.k. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 May 2021 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM)

(Case T-261/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 278/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rochem Group AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rochem Marine Srl (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: R. Gioia and L. Mansi, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2020 (Case R 1547/2019-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Rochem Marine and Rochem Group.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Rochem Group AG and Rochem Marine Srl.

(1) OJ C 222, 6.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission

(Case T-141/20) (1)

(2021/C 252/64)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 June 2021 — OM v Commission

(Case T-728/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Social security - JSIS - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Rejection of the application - Rejection of the complaint - Substitution of grounds - Lodging of a second complaint - Time limit for bringing an action - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 338/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: OM (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment, first, of the decisions of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the Commission of 9 and 17 September 2019 refusing to reimburse the costs of medical analyses incurred by the applicant and, secondly, of the decision of 23 March 2020 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against those decisions.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. OM shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.
Order of the General Court of 14 June 2021 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective cover for computer hardware)

(Case T-565/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a protective cover for computer hardware - Ground for invalidity - Unauthorised use of a work protected under the copyright law of a Member State - Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Request that witnesses be heard - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 310/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor GmbH (Bensheim, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zagg Inc. (Midvale, Utah, United States) (represented by: T. Schmitz and M. Breuer, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 June 2020 (Case R 297/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between TrekStor and Zagg.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. TrekStor GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 378, 9.11.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 September 2021 — Stena Line Scandinavia v Commission

(Case T-391/20) (1)

(2021/C 490/63)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 August 2021 — GitLab v EUIPO — Gitlab (GitLab)

(Case T-418/20) (1)

(2021/C 422/53)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2021 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission

(Case T-744/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Act imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility - Definitive anti-dumping duty - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 73/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (Molteno, Italy) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, G. Pandey and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1428 of 12 October 2020 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2020 L 336, p. 8).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Airoldi Metalli SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The European Parliament, Airoldi Metalli and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.
Order of the General Court of 22 October 2021 — Fachverband Spielhallen and LM v Commission

(Case T-510/20) (1)

(State aid - Tax treatment of operators of public casinos in Germany - Complaint - Preliminary examination stage - Commission decision finding that there is no State aid - Conditions for initiating a formal investigation procedure - Serious difficulties - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Levy on the profits - Advantage - Selectivity - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 513/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Fachverband Spielhallen eV (Berlin, Germany) and LM (represented by: A. Bartosch and R. Schmidt, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: R Kanitz and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 8819 final of 9 December 2019 on State aid SA.44944 (2019/C ex 2019/FC) — Tax treatment of public casinos operators in Germany and SA.53552 (2019/C ex 2019/FC) — Alleged guarantee for public casinos operators in Germany (Wirtschaftlichkeitsgarantie), inasmuch as it rejects the complaint lodged by the applicants against the fact that the sums paid by operators of public casinos to the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) as a levy on the profits were deductible from the tax bases for the trade tax and the income or corporation tax.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Fachverband Spielhallen eV and LM shall pay, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 April 2022 — Satabank v ECB

(Case T-563/20) (1)

(2022/C 276/34)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission

(Case T-725/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Act imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility - Definitive anti-dumping duty - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 119/61)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd (Qingyuan, China) and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd (Yuan Tan Town, China) (represented by: M. Maresca, C. Malinconico, D. Guardamagna, M. Guardamagna, D. Maresca, A. Cerruti, A. Malinconico and G. La Malfa Ribolla, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, P. Němečková and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for, primarily, annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1428 of 12 October 2020 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2020 L 336, p. 8), and, in the alternative, annulment of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 May 2021 — Suez v Commission

(Case T-121/21) (1)

(2021/C 278/97)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 October 2021 — LF v Commission

(Case T-178/21) (1)

(2022/C 2/73)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 September 2021 — Firearms United Network and Others v Commission

(Case T-187/21 R)

(Application for interim relief - REACH - Amendment of Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Restriction on lead and lead compounds - Use of lead shot - Protection of wetlands - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2021/C 452/51)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicants: Firearms United Network (Warsaw, Poland), Tomasz Walter Stępień (Żelechów, Poland), Michał Budzyński (Cegłów, Poland), Andrzej Marcjanik (Złotokłos, Poland) (represented by: E. Woźniak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/57 of 25 January 2021 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), as regards lead in gunshot in or around wetlands (OJ 2021 L 24, p. 19).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Rooken and Others v Parliament

(Case T-723/21 R)

(Application for interim measures - Members of Parliament - Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2022/C 95/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Robert Jan Rooken (Muiderberg, Netherlands) an 8 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru and L. Panepinto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves and A.-M. Dumbrăvan, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the suspension of operation of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 27 October 2021 on the exceptional health and safety rules governing access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 15 November 2021, Rooken and Others v Parliament (T-723/21 R), is set aside.
Order of the General Court of 18 November 2021 — RG v Council

(Case T-157/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Area of freedom, security and justice - Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Euratom, on the one hand, and the United Kingdom, on the other - Council decision on the signing and on provisional application of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement - Mechanism of surrender pursuant to an arrest warrant - Person arrested and detained in Ireland after the end of the transition period for the purpose of the execution of a European Arrest Warrant issued by the United Kingdom during the transition period - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 37/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: RG (represented by: R. Purcell, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Antoniadis, J. Ciantar and A. Stefanuc, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the partial annulment of Council Decision (EU) 2020/2252 of 29 December 2020 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and on provisional application of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, and of the Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland concerning security procedures for exchanging and protecting classified information (OJ 2020 L 444, p. 2).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Ireland and the European Commission.

3. RG is ordered to pay, in addition to his own costs, those incurred by the Council of the European Union, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

4. RG, the Council, Ireland and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 288, 14.6.2021.
Order of the General Court of 10 February 2022 — TO v EEA

(Case T-434/21) (1)

(Civil service - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Decision which was not contested in time - Res judicata - Conditional undertaking given by the AECC in the context of a favourable out-of-court settlement - Settlement offer not accepted by the applicant - No act adversely affecting the applicant - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 165/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Environment Agency (represented by: O. Cornu, acting as Agent, supported by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, in the first place, annulment of the decision of 21 September 2020 by which the EEA, (i) refused to comply with the judgment of the Court of 11 June 2019, TO v EEA (T-462/17, not published, EU:T:2019:397) and (ii) rejected the requests made by the applicant on 16 September 2020 and, in the second place, an order requiring the EEA to pay the applicant, (i) the sum corresponding to the compensation in lieu of notice and the installation allowance, together with interest as from 22 September 2016, (ii) the sum of EUR 20 000 in compensation for the alleged non-material damage suffered on account of the disclosure of her personal data to third parties and (iii) the sum of EUR 20 000 in compensation for the alleged non-material damage suffered on account of the refusal to disclose to her the correspondence exchanged with her previous counsel both before and after the delivery of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Orders TO to pay, in addition to her own costs, those incurred by the European Environment Agency (EEA).

(1) OJ C 349 of 30.8.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2022 — Tralux and Others v Parliament

(Case T-488/21) (1)

(2022/C 119/86)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.