EN Official Journal of the European Union C 93/10

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 February 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio (Italy)) — Crono Service Scarl and Others (C-419/12) and Anitrav — Associazione Nazionale Imprese Trasporto Viaggiatori (C-420/12) v Roma Capitale and Regione Lazio (C-420/12)

(Joined Cases C-419/12 and C-420/12) (1)

(Requests for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 TFEU, 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU - Car and driver hire services - Purely internal situation - Jurisdiction of the Court - Conditions for admissibility)

2014/C 93/16

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Crono Service Scarl, Carla Silvestri, Nando Cese, Fabrizio Melaragno, Yahia Nafea, Robert Martin, Angelo Minosse, Raimondo Pratico’, Angelo Vincenti, Bruno Pesce, Francesco Fedeli, Roberto Sebastiani, Francesco Nanni, Vincenzo Savino, Andrea Rossi, Filiberto Marinelli, Liberato Puglia, Stefano Sordelli, Carlo Antonini, Andrea Iannilli, Pasquale Iavarone, Roberto Agostinelli, Valerio Giannoni, Fernando Boccadamo, Aristide Salvati, Annalisa Di Grigoli, Antonio Evangelisti, Marco Brecciaroli, Cardoso Wandenberg, Fabrizio Villamaina, Sandro Rossi, Fabrizio Di Somone, Debora Falasca, Elisabetta Serrano, Claudio Bandini, Bruno Piromallo, Maurizio Pesce, Mirko Capogrossi, Giovanni Barilotti, Stefano Petitti, Paolo Ricci, Vincenzo Curto, Luci Di Luzio, Gianfrancesco Argiro’, Magdi Gou Bial, Secondo Uffreduzzi, Fausto Menotti, Maurizio Montini, Danilo Valdambrini, Andrea Orfei, Daniele Silvestrini, Maurizio Borzi, Flavio Piromalli, Carlo Campanari, Volodymyr Lupu, Solution Car scarl, Paolo De Santis, Michele Rienzi, Roberta Rinaldi, Bps Autonoleggio scarl, Sebastiano Favara, Stefano Calabretta, Adriano Carducci, Giuseppa Gabriello, Modestino Capaccio, Mario Paruzza, Massimiliano Casu, Luciano Gulizia, Planet Service scarl, Fabio Belmonte, Fabrizio Romagnoli, Italo Ratta, Fabio Martella, Ilario Fiano, Coop Michelangelo, Michele Falcione, Roberto Natalizia, Claudio Botticelli, Odoardo Palombelli, Mario Rondeoni, Massimiliano Dionisi, Luigi Vitrano, Stefano Iovino, Merella Micheciivo, Daniele Latorre, Walter Luccaferri, Bruno Iannone, Mariannina Tesone, Alessandro Polidoro, Giorgio Scortichini, Fabio Atturi, Coop Leonardo, Coop Sia A Srl, Marco Lucaferri, Roberto Turchetti, Corrado Mortillaro, Gianrico Lanternari, Sandro Baronciani, Ugo Mecchia, Flavio Meroni, Giuseppina Berchicci, Enrico Poddi, Nicola Solipacca, Franco Perazzola, Agostino Di Sciullo, Sergio Angeletti, Patrizio Tesi, Fabio Carrozi, Tommaso Pagani, Marco Stivoli, Roberto Miglio, Professional Car Service Snc, Massimo Mongiovì, Roberto Corona (C-419/12) and Anitrav — Associazione Nazionale Imprese Trasporto Viaggiatori (C-420/12)

Defendants: Roma Capitale and Regione Lazio (C-420/12)

In the presence of: UGL Taxi — Unione Generale del Lavoro Taxi and Others, Codacons — Coordinamento delle associazioni per la tutela dell’ambiente e dei diritti degli utenti e consumatori (C-420/12)

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Interpretation of Articles 26 TFEU, 49 TFEU, 90 TFEU, of Article 3 TEU read in conjunction with Article 4(3) TEU and Articles 3 TFEU, 4 TFEU, 5 TFEU and 6 TFEU, and of Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU — Car and driver hire service — National legislation making the provision of that service conditional upon possession of an authorisation issued by the municipal authorities and requiring anyone holding such an authorisation to have the normal base for their vehicle(s) located in the territory of the municipality which issued the authorisation and to have a registered office within that territory, and to begin and end the hire in that territory

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the requests from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio (Italy) for a preliminary ruling, made by decisions of 20 June 2012 in Joined Cases C-419/12 and C-420/12, to the extent that those requests concern the interpretation of Article 49 TFEU. Those requests are inadmissible to the extent that they concern the interpretation of other provisions of EU law.

(1) OJ C 366, 24.11.2012.