ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 June 2021 — One Voice v ECHA

(Case T-663/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - REACH - Substance homosalate - Exclusive use for the manufacture of cosmetic products - Compliance check of registrations - Article 41(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Time limit for bringing an action - Article 21(5) of Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 - Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 310/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: One Voice (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Ghersi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: W. Broere and L. Bolzonello, acting as Agents, and by S. Raes, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision A-009-2018 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 18 August 2020, relating to the compliance check of a registration dossier for homosalate.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. One Voice is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.
Order of the General Court of 14 October 2021 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament

(Case T-100/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - Member of the Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Request for privileges and immunities to be defended - Decision of the President of the Parliament not to grant that request - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 502/43)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Oriol Junqueras i Vies (Sant Joan de Vilatorrada, Spain) (represented by: M. Marsal i Ferret, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the President of the Parliament of 10 December 2019 not to grant the request, made on behalf of the applicant, for his immunities, as referred to in the first and second paragraphs of Article 9 of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union, to be defended.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of Spain.

3. Mr Oriol Junqueras i Vies shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

4. The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 August 2021 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER)

(Case T-387/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 452/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DK Company A/S (Ikast, Denmark) (represented by: S. Hansen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Hunter Boot Ltd (Edinburgh, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 April 2020 (Case R 849/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Hunter Boot and DK Company.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action;

2. DK Company A/S shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.
Order of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Shoe)

(Case T-684/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a shoe - Earlier national and Community designs produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity - Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 - Grounds for invalidity - Lack of novelty - No individual character - Degree of freedom of the designer - No different overall impression - Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 109/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH (Feldkirchen bei Graz, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rieker Schuh AG (Thayngen, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Schabenberger, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2020 (Case R 1649/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Legero Schuhfabrik and Rieker Schuh.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — Ardex v EUIPO — Chen (ArtiX PAINTS)

(Case T-136/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 24/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ardex GmbH (Witten, Germany) (represented by: C. Becker, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lian Chen (Seseña Nuevo, Spain) (represented by: A. González López-Menchero and V. Valero Piña, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 November 2019 (Case R 2503/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Ardex and Mr Chen.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ardex GmbH and Mr Lian Chen.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Order of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — JP v Commission

(Case T-638/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Open competition - Notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of taxation (AD 7) - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Lis pendens - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 340/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JP (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska and T. Lilamand, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 10 December 2019 by which the selection board for Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 refused, after review, to include her name on the reserve list of successful candidates in that competition, and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. JP shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 19 January 2022 — FC v EASO

(Case T-148/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Refusal to provide a certificate of good character - Refusal to accept a withdrawal of the resignation - Purely confirmatory act - Time limit for complaints - Irregularity in the pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Close link with the claim for annulment - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 119/58)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: FC (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (represented by: P. Eyckmans and M. Stamatopoulou, acting as Agents, and by A. Guillerme and T. Bontinck, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of EASO’s decision of [confidential] refusing to accept the applicant’s withdrawal of her resignation and rejecting the request for a certificate of good character and the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint against it and, second, compensation for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. FC shall bear her own costs.

(1) OJ C 175, 25.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2021 — Mendes de Almeida v Council

(Case T-75/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Appointment of the European Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Portugal - Period for instituting proceedings - Starting point of the period for instituting proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 338/30)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Ana Mendes de Almeida (Sobreda, Portugal) (represented by: R. Leandro Vasconcelos and M. Marques de Carvalho, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Pleśniak, R. Meyer, K. Kouri and J. Gil, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1117 of 27 July 2020 appointing the European Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (OJ 2020 L 244, p. 18), in so far as it appoints Mr Moreira Alves d’Oliveira Guerra as European Prosecutor of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office as temporary agent at grade AD 13 for a non-renewable period of three years from 29 July 2020.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to rule on the request for an expedited procedure.

3. There is no longer any need to rule on the cross-claim made by the Council.

4. Ms Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 12 March 2021 — Ciano Trading & Services CT & S and Others v Commission

(Case T-45/21 R)

(Interim relief - Public procurement - Application for interim measures - Inadmissibility - Lack of urgency)

(2021/C 182/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Ciano Trading & Services CT & S SpA (Fiuminco, Italy), Silvia Brizio (Venaria Reale, Italy), Laurence André (Grivegnée, Belgium), Lidia Pacitti (Neder-over-Heembeek, Belgium) (represented by: D. Gillet and S. Van Beisen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Van Noyen and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, in particular and in essence, the suspension of the operation of the decision of the Commission of 20 November 2020 cancelling the call for tenders OIB/2019/CPN/0039 for a contract to be concluded for the management/operation of a service concession for sustainable group catering, including banqueting services, beverages for meetings and meals for children.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for temporary interim relief is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 October 2021 — Paccor Packaging v Commission

(Case T-148/21 R)

(Interim relief - Environment - Directive (EU) 2019/904 - Reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2151 - Harmonised marking specifications for beverage cups - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2021/C 490/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Paccor Packaging GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: P. Kugel and G. Dávid, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Bourgois and L. Haasbeek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2151 of 17 December 2020 laying down rules on harmonised marking specifications on single-use plastic products listed in Part D of the Annex to Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (OJ 2020 L 428, p. 57).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 28 July 2021 — SN v Parliament

(Case T-249/21 R)

(Interim measures - Member of the European Parliament - Recovery of allowances paid by way of reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Inadmissibility - No urgency)

(2021/C 401/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: SN (represented by: P. Eleftheriadis, Barrister)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of the decision of the Parliament of 21 December 2020 concerning the recovery of the sum of EUR 196 199,84 unduly paid and debit note No 7010000021 of 15 January 2021 issued pursuant to that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2021 — Cepewa v EUIPO — Out of the blue (Lieblingsmensch)

(Case T-48/21) (1)

(2022/C 73/86)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.
Order of the General Court of 9 November 2021 — Amort and Others v Commission

(Case T-267/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen — COVID-19 vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S [recombinant])’ - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Lack of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 24/55)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Heidi Amort (Jenesien, Italy) and the 22 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 1763 (final) of 11 March 2021 granting a conditional marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen — COVID-19 vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S [recombinant])’, a medicinal product for human use, as amended and supplemented.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by TF, TG, TH and TI, by TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II and by VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II.

3. Ms Heidi Amort and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex I shall pay the costs.

4. TF, TG, TH and TI, TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II and VH and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 263, 5.7.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 January 2022 — Alauzun and Others v Commission and EMA

(Case T-418/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Amendment to the conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Comirnaty - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - No interest in bringing proceedings - No direct concern - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 128/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Virginie Alauzun (Saint-Cannat, France) and 774 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: F. Di Vizio, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, L. Haasbeek and K. Mifsud-Bonnicci, acting as Agents), European Medicines Agency (represented by: S. Drosos, C. Schultheiss and S. Marino, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment, first, of Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 4034 final of 31 May 2021 amending the conditional marketing authorisation granted by Implementing Decision C(2020) 9598 final for ‘Comirnaty — COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified)’, a medicinal product for human use, and, second, of the EMA’s opinion of 28 May 2021.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Ms Virginie Alauzun and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 January 2022 — Flybe v Commission

(Case T-380/21) (1)

(2022/C 119/85)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 1 March 2022 — Agreiter and Others v Commission

(Case T-632/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Amendment of the conditional marketing authorisation for Spikevax, a medicinal product for human use - COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified) - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 198/74)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Karin Agreiter (Merano, Italy) and the 33 other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex to the order (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 of the TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 5686 final of 23 July 2021 amending the conditional marketing authorisation for ‘Spikevax’ — COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified), a medicinal product for human use granted by Implementing Decision C(2021) 94 final of 6 January 2021.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Moderna Biotech Spain SL.

3. Ms Karin Agreiter and the other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex shall pay the costs.

4. Moderna Biotech Spain shall bear its own costs related to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2022 — eSlovensko Bratislava v Commission

(Case T-304/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Financial provisions - EU programme on promoting safer use of the internet - Designation of the defendant - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 171/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: eSlovensko Bratislava (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: B. Fridrich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and S. Romoli, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2021) 1953853 of 30 March 2021 to terminate the grant agreement concluded with the applicant concerning project 2015 SK IA 0038 (‘Slovak Safer Internet Centre IV’).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. eSlovensko Bratislava is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Advanced Organic Materials v EUIPO — Swiss Pharma International (ADVASTEROL)

(Case T-6/21) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 237/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Advanced Organic Materials, SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Swiss Pharma International AG (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 October 2020 (Case R 781/2020-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Swiss Pharma International and Advanced Organic Materials.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Advanced Organic Materials, SA and Swiss Pharma International AG shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 1 April 2022 — Classen Holz Kontor v EUIPO — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer (new type tiling DRYTILE)

(Case T-308/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/67)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — NQ v Council and Others

(Case T-803/21) (1)

(2022/C 284/82)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 109, 7.3.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 April 2022 — Paccor Packaging and Others v Commission

(Case T-148/21) (1)

(2022/C 276/35)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 19 July 2022 — Anglofranchise v EUIPO — Bugrey (BOY LONDON)

(Case T-439/21) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 359/91)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Anglofranchise Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, F. Rossi, N. Parrotta and R. Perotti, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Yuliya Bugrey (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Russo, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the EUIPO of 23 April 2021 (Case R 459/2020-5), relating to cancellation proceedings between Yuliya Bugrey and Anglofranchise.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Anglofranchise Ltd and Yuliya Bugrey shall bear their own costs and each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 357, 6.9.2021.