ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/23

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Melkveebedrijf Overenk and Others v Commission

(Case T-540/11) (1)

(Action for damages - Levy in the milk and milk products sector - Regulation (EC) No 1468/2006 - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 336/47

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Melkveebedrijf Overenk BV (Sint Anthonis, Netherlands); Maatschap Veehouderij Kwakernaak (Oosterwolde, Netherlands); Mulders Agro vof (Heerle, Netherlands); Melkveebedrijf Engelen vof (Grashoek, Netherlands); Melkveebedrijf De Peel BV (Heusden, Netherlands); and Mathijs Moonen (Nederweert, Netherlands) (represented by P. Mazel and A. van Beelen, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by Z. Malůšková and B. Burggraaf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Claim for damages for the loss allegedly caused to the applicants by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1468/2006 of 4 October 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector (JO 2006 L 274, p. 6).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Melkveebedrijf Overenk BV, Maatschap Veehouderij Kwakernaak, Mulders Agro vof, Melkveebedrijf Engelen vof, Melkveebedrijf De Peel BV and Mr Mathijs Moonen are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/24

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — Smart Technologies v OHIM (SMART NOTEBOOK)

(Case T-648/11) (1)

2014/C 329/35

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 58, 25.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/38

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — El Gazaerly v Council

(Case T-266/11) (1)

2014/C 184/61

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 219, 23. 7. 2011.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — SiNN v Commission

(Case T-621/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: SiNN GmbH, formerly SinnLeffers GmbH (Hagen, Germany) (represented by: initially, C. Rupp and H. Wunderlich, then, H. Wunderlich and T. Engelmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by SiNN GmbH;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 39, 11.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 27/75

Order of the General Court of 25 November 2015 — Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v Commission

(Case T-494/11) (1)

(2016/C 027/94)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) C 331, 12.11.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/69

Order of the General Court of 12 November 2012 — Shannon Free Airport Development v Commission

(Case T-200/12) (1)

2013/C 26/139

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 258, 25.8.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 366/35

Order of the General Court of 8 October 2012 — ClientEarth v Council

(Case T-62/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Opinion issued by the legal service of the Council concerning a draft regulation of the Parliament and of the Council related to public access to the documents of the Parliament, of the Council and of the Commission - Confirmation of a refusal to grant full access - Inadmissibility - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Notion of measure open to challenge for the purposes of Article 263 TFEU - Confirmatory measure)

2012/C 366/70

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: O. Brouwer and P. van den Berg, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and C. Fekete, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Council’s decision of 1 December 2011 confirming the decision to refuse the applicant full access to an opinion issued by the legal service of the Council (Document No 6865/09) concerning a draft regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden.

3. ClientEarth is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/27

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Elegant Target Development and Others v Council

(Case T-90/12) (1)

2013/C 38/50

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/69

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 December 2012 — Wahl v OHIM — Tenacta Group (bellissima)

(Case T-77/12) (1)

2013/C 26/138

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 189/24

Order of the General Court of 7 May 2013 — Cat Media Pty Ltd v OHIM — Avon Products (RETANEW)

(Case T-246/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to rule)

2013/C 189/49

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cat Media Pty Ltd (Warriewood, Australia) (represented by: I. De Freitas, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Avon Products, Inc. (New York, United States) (represented by: U. Stelzenmüller, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 March 2012 (Case R 740/2011-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Avon Products, Inc. and Cat Media Pty Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to rule on the appeal

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.
2.

Operation of Commission Decision C(2012) 5718 final of 6 August 2012 on the rejection of a request for confidential treatment submitted by Pilkington Group Ltd pursuant to Article 8 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (Case COMP/39.125 — Car glass) is suspended in relation to two categories of information, as referred to in point 6 of Decision C(2012) 5718 final, concerning, first, customer names, product names or descriptions of products, as well as any other information which might identify individual customers and, second, the number of parts supplied by Pilkington Group, the share of the business of a particular car manufacturer, pricing calculations, price changes etc.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 344/68

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2013 — RiskMetrics Solutions v OHIM — (RISKMANAGER)

(Case T-557/12) (1)

2013/C 344/125

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 370, 17.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/80

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2013 — Elitaliana v Eulex Kosovo

(Case T-213/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public service contracts - Public procurement procedure - Helicopter support to the EULEX Kosovo mission - Rejection of the bid of a tenderer - No legal capacity to be a defendant - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 225/178

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Elitaliana SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: R. Colagrande, lawyer)

Defendant: Eulex Kosovo (Pristina, Kosovo) (represented by: G. Brosadola Pontotti, Solicitor)

Re:

Firstly, application for annulment of the decision by Eulex Kosovo to award the contract to a tenderer other than the applicant in tendering procedure ‘EuropeAid/131516/D/SER/XK’ concerning helicopter support to the EULEX Mission in Kosovo (PROC/272/11) and, secondly, a claim for compensation against Eulex Kosovo for the loss purportedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.

Operative part

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Elitaliana SpA is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

(1) OJ C 200, 7.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/11

Order of the General Court of 23 January 2014 — Pro-Duo v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (GO!)

(Case T-141/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2014/C 78/22

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pro-Duo NV (Ghent, Belgium) (represented initially by T.G. Alkin, subsequently by T.G. Alkin and C. Hall, Barristers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, E. Seijo Veiguela and I. Munilla Muñoz, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 January 2012 (Case R 1373/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés, SA and Pro-Duo NV.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs borne by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/44

Order of the General Court of 2 December 2013 — Indesit Company v OHIM — ILVE (quadrio)

(Case T-214/12) (1)

2014/C 45/76

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 292/59

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2014 — Württembergische Gemeinde-Versicherung v Commission

(Case T-421/12) (1)

2014/C 292/76

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 373, 1.12.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 142/34

Order of the General Court of 5 March 2013 — Chrysamed Vertrieb v OHIM — Chrysal International (Chrysamed)

(Case T-46/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 142/44

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH (Salzburg, Austria) (represented by: initially T. Schneider, subsequently M. Koch and finally I. Rungg, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Chrysal International BV (Naarden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Killan, M. Marell and M. Senftleben, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 November 2011 (Case R 64/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Chrysal International BV and Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 81/18

Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — Bolívar Cerezo v OHIM — Renovalia Energy (RENOVALIA)

(Case T-166/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark RENOVALIA - Earlier national word marks RENOVA ENERGY and RENOVAENERGY - Partial refusal to register - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 081/23)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Juan Bolívar Cerezo (Granada, Spain) (represented by: I. Barroso Sánchez-Lafuente, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Renovalia Energy, SA (Villarobledo, Spain) (represented by: A. Velázquez Ibáñez, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 January 2012 (Case R 663/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Renovalia Energy, SA and Mr Juan Bolívar Cerezo.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed;

2. Mr Juan Bolívar Cerezo is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/25

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Khwanda v Council

(Case T-178/12) (1)

2014/C 329/36

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/55

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2017 — Meta Group v Commission

(Case T-471/12) (1)

(2017/C 283/85)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/52

Order of the General Court of 1 December 2015 — REWE-Zentral v OHIM — Planet GDZ (PRO PLANET)

(Case T-373/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 038/68)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: REWE-Zentral AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented initially by M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, and subsequently by M. Kinkeldey and C. Schmitt, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Planet GDZ AG (Tagelswangen, Switzerland) (represented initially by M. Nentwig and G.M. Becker, and subsequently by M. Nentwig, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 June 2012 (Case R 1350/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Planet GDZ AG and REWE-Zentral AG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. REWE-Zentral and Planet GDZ AG are ordered to bear their own costs and are each ordered to pay half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

(1) OJ C 319, 20.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/25

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Bouillez v Council

(Case T-31/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2007 promotion year - Decision not to promote the appellant to Grade AST 7 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 266 TFEU - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Contradictory reasons - Comparative examination of the merits - Appeal in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

2013/C 336/53

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Vincent Bouillez (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Other party: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the decision of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2012 in Case F-75/11 Bouillez v Council (not yet published in the ECR), and seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is rejected.

2. Mr Vincent Bouillez is to bear his own costs and those incurred by the Council of the European Union in these proceedings.

(1) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/83

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2013 — MasterCard International v OHIM — Nehra (surfpin)

(Case T-13/13) (1)

2013/C 225/191

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/33

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-204/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Action at first instance dismissed as manifestly inadmissible - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for brining proceedings and signed by a seal reproducing the lawyer’s signature - Original application lodged out of time - Action out of time - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2014/C 45/56

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2013 in Case F-95/12 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/15

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 October 2013 — Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Itelazpi v Commission

(Case T-462/13 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery and the cancellation of any outstanding payments - Application for suspension of operation - Failure to show urgency)

2013/C 359/29

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco, and Itelazpi, SA (Zamudio, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, A. Lamadrid de Pablo, M. Muñoz de Juan and N. Ruiz García, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, B. Stromsky et P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Articles 3 and 4 of Commission Decision C(2013) 3204 final of 19 June 2013 on State aid SA.28599 (C 23/2010) (ex NN 36/010, ex CP 163/2009) implemented by the Kingdom of Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less-urbanised areas (other than Castilla-La Mancha).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed;
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/38

Order of the General Court of 20 February 2014 — Jannatian v Council

(Case T-187/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran - List of persons and entities to which those restrictive measures apply - Period within which an action must be brought - Action brought out of time - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 135/49

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mahmoud Jannatian (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: E. Rosenfeld and S. Monnerville, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment, in so far as they concern the applicant, of: (i) Council Common Position 2008/479/CFSP of 23 June 2008 amending Common Position 2007/140/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2008 L 163, p. 43); (ii) Council Decision 2008/475/EC of 23 June 2008 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2008 L 163, p. 29); (iii) Council Common Position 2008/652/CFSP of 7 August 2008 amending Common Position 2007/140/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2008 L 213, p. 58); (iv) Council Decision 2009/840/CFSP of 17 November 2009 implementing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2009 L 303, p. 64); (v) Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2009 of 17 November 2009 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Decision 2008/475/EC (OJ 2009 L 303, p. 31); (vi) Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39); (vii) Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 81); (viii) Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1); and (ix) Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. Mr Mahmoud Jannatian shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/45

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2013 — European Space Imaging v Commission

(Case T-357/13) (1)

2014/C 45/82

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.