ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 205/31

Order of the General Court of 23 April 2015 — Chatzianagnostou v Council and Others

(Case T-383/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Seconded National expert for the EULEX Kosovo mission - Decisions of a Head of Mission on disciplinary sanctions))

(2015/C 205/41)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Antonios Chatzianagnostou (Serres, Greece) (represented by: C. Makris, lawyer)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou, A. Vitro and M. Bauer, acting as Agents) European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, A.-C. Simon and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents); and Eulex Kosovo (Pristina, Kosovo) (represented by: B. Borchardt, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Fouquet, lawyer)

Re

Action for annulment of decisions of 10 May 2013 in disciplinary cases Nos 02/2013 and 06/2013, signed by the Head of the EULEX Kosovo mission.

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2) Mr Antonios Chatzianagnostou is ordered to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and Eulex Kosovo.

(1) OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 138/49

Order of the General Court of 26 February 2015 — Métropole Gestion v OHIM — Metropol (METROPOL)

(Case T-431/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Word mark METROPOL - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Failure to apply for renewal of the registration of the mark - Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 138/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Métropole Gestion (Paris, France) (represented by: M.-A. Roux Steinkühler, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Metropol Investment Financial Company Ltd (Moscow, Russia)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 June 2013 (Cases affaires R 723/2012-2 and R 845/2012-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Métropole Gestion and Metropol Investment Financial Company Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Métropole Gestion and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall each bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 429/29

Order of the General Court of 22 October 2015 — Elan v Commission

(Case T-27/13) (1)

(2015/C 429/37)

Language of the case: Slovene

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 311/44

Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — Frank Bold v Commission

(Case T-19/13) (1)

((Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Decision granting the Czech Republic an option for transitional free allocation for the modernisation of electricity generation - Request for internal review of that decision - Lack of measure of individual scope - Commission decision declaring the request for a review inadmissible - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 311/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Frank Bold Society, formerly Ekologický právní servis (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: P. Černý, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: P. Oliver and L. Pignataro-Nolin, and subsequently by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller and D. Hadroušek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of (i) Commission Decision C(2012) 8382 final of 12 November 2012 rejecting as inadmissible the request for internal review of Commission decision C(2012) 4576 final of 6 July 2012 granting the Czech Republic an option for transitional free allocation for the modernisation of electricity generation, and (ii) the latter decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Frank Bold Society is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Czech Republic shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 104/40

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2018 — Italy and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-125/13, T-152/13 and T-167/13) (1)

((State aid - Groundhandling services - Capital injections provided by SEA in favour of Sea Handling - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Partial removal from the register - Withdrawal - No need to adjudicate in part - Removal from the register of undertakings))

(2018/C 104/52)

Language of the cases: Italian

Parties

Applicant in Case T-125/13: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and S. Fiorentino, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant in Case T-152/13: Sea Handling SpA (Somma Lombardo, Italy) (represented initially by B. Nascimbene, F. Rossi dal Pozzo, M. Merola and L. Cappelletti, and subsequently by B. Nascimbene, F. Rossi dal Pozzo and M. Merola, lawyers)

Applicant in Case T-167/13: Comune di Milano (Italy) (represented initially by S. Grassani and A. Franchi, and subsequently by S. Grassani, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the applicant in Case T-152/13: Società per azioni esercizi aeroportuali (SEA) (Segrate, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, B. Nascimbene, F. Rossi dal Pozzo and M.C. Toniolo, lawyers) and Comune di Milano (Italy) (represented initially by S. Grassani and A. Franchi, and subsequently by S. Grassani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte and D. Grespan, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1225 of 19 December 2012 regarding injections of capital by SEA SpA into Sea Handling SpA (Case SA.21420 (C 14/10) (ex NN 25/10) (ex CP 175/06)) (OJ 2015 L 201, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. Cases T-125/13, T-152/13 and T-167/13 are disjoined for the purposes of the oral part of the procedure and of the decision closing the proceedings.

2. Case T-125/13 is removed from the register of the General Court.

3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action brought by Sea Handling SpA in Case T-152/13.

4. In Case T-125/13, the Italian Republic and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

5. In Case T-152/13, Sea Handling and the Commission shall bear their own costs, including those in relation to the interlocutory proceedings. Società per azioni esercizi aeroportuali (SEA) and the Comune di Milano (Italy) shall bear their own costs in relation to Case T-152/13.

6. In Case T-167/13, the costs are reserved.

(1) OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/32

Order of the General Court of 7 September 2016 — Gemeente Eindhoven v Commission

(Case T-370/13) (1)

(2016/C 410/46)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 302/53

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 June 2015 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament

(Case T-259/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Public works contracts - Tendering procedure - Construction of a central energy unit - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

(2015/C 302/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: SA Close (Harzé-Aywaille, Belgium) and Cegelec (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-M. Rikkers and J.-L. Teheux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Rantala, M. Mraz and F. Poilvache, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of 19 March 2015 by which the Parliament rejected the bid which the applicants had submitted following the call for tenders INLO-D-UPIL-T-14-A04 relating to the public works contract concerning Lot No 73 (central energy unit) of the ‘Project for the extension and modernisation of the Konrad Adenauer Building in Luxembourg’ and of the decision of the same day by which the contract at issue was awarded to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 338/23

Corrigendum to the notice in the Official Journal in Case T-396/15

( Official Journal of the European Union C 283 of 28 August 2017 )

(2017/C 338/26)

The notice in the Official Journal in Case T-396/15, Herm. Sprenger v EUIPO — web2get (Shape of an articulated stirrup), should read as follows:

Order of the General Court of 30 May 2017 — Herm. Sprenger v EUIPO — web2get (Shape of an articulated stirrup) (Case T-396/15) (1) ((EU trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)) (2017/C 283/74) Language of the case: German Parties Applicant: Herm. Sprenger GmbH & Co. KG (Iserlohn, Germany) (represented by: V. Schiller, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and A. Schifko, acting as Agents) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: web2get GmbH & Co. KG (Dülmen, Germany) Re: Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 April 2015 (Case R 520/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between web2get GmbH & Co. KG and Herm. Sprenger GmbH & Co. KG. Operative part of the order 1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. 2. Herm. Sprenger GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 389/65

Order of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — db-Technologies Deutschland v OHIM — MIP Metro (Sigma)

(Case T-267/15) (1)

(2015/C 389/74)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 328/9

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — Opko Ireland Global Holdings v OHIM — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (ALPHAREN)

(Case T-106/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision by OHIM - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 328/07)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Opko Ireland Global Holdings (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and A. Smith, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (Jerusalem, Israel) (represented by: G Farrington, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 November 2014 (Case R 2387/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Opko Ireland Global Holdings Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear all of the costs.

(1) OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 59/51

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2015 — Ahrend Furniture v Commission

(Case T-482/15) (1)

(2016/C 059/59)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/75

Order of the General Court of 23 November 2015 — Necci v Commission

(Case T-211/15 P) (1)

(2016/C 038/101)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/54

Order of the General Court of 14 March 2016 — Fondazione Casamica v Commission and EASME

(Case T-569/15) (1)

(2016/C 156/75)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/35

Order of the General Court of 16 February 2016 — Industrias Químicas del Vallés v Commission

(Case T-296/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Plant protection products - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 - Establishing a list of candidates for substitution - Inclusion of metalaxyl on that list - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 136/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Industrias Químicas del Vallés, SA (Mollet del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: C. Fernández Vicién, I. Moreno-Tapia Rivas and C. Vila Gisbert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Galindo Martín, P. Ondrůšek and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and establishing a list of candidates for substitution (OJ 2015 L 67, p. 18).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. Industrias Químicas del Vallés, SA shall bear the costs.

(1) OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/23

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2016 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-550/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - EAGF and EAFRD - Period within which proceedings must be commenced - Point from which time starts to run - Delay - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 200/33)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, P. Estêvão and J. Saraiva de Almeida, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1119 of 22 June 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD (OJ 2015 L 182, p. 39) in so far as that decision excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Portuguese Republic.

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. The Portuguese Republic shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 389, 23.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 191/46

Order of the General Court of 5 April 2016 — HK Intertrade v Council

(Case T-526/15) (1)

(2016/C 191/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/28

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2016 — Europäischer Tier- und Naturschutz and Giesen v Commission

(Case T-595/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Alleged refusal to submit a legislative proposal for the establishment of a European law association - Act not amenable to review - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 279/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Europäischer Tier- und Naturschutz eV (Much, Germany) and Horst Giesen (Much) (represented by: P. Brockmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer and K.-P. Wojcik, Agents)

Re

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of the Commission’s letter of 17 August 2015 by which it declined to submit a legislative proposal aimed at establishing a European association.

Operative part

1) The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2) Europäischer Tier- und Naturschutz eV and Horst Giesen are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 251/32

Order of the General Court of 13 May 2016 — CEVA v Commission

(Case T-601/15) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Technological research and development project in the area entitled ‘Algae grown from sustainable aquaculture as raw material for biodegradable bioplastics’ - SEABIOPLAS contract - Demand for payment of the financial contribution due - Offsetting - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Delay - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 251/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) (Pleubian, France) (represented by: E. De Boissieu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 272 TFEU seeking an order that the Commission pay the first instalment of the grant due to the applicant under the SEABIOPLAS contract (reference FP7-SME-2013-606032-SEABIOPLAS) concerning a technological research and development project in the area entitled ‘Algae grown from sustainable aquaculture as raw material for biodegradable bioplastics’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 429, 21.12.2015
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/34

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Souruh v Council

(Case T-468/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/54)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 335/46

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2016 — Alcimos Consulting v ECB

(Case T-368/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Action for compensation - Decisions adopted by the Governing Council of the ECB - Provision of emergency liquidity assistance to Greek banks - Ceiling - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility - Infringement of procedural requirements))

(2016/C 335/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Alcimos Consulting SMPC (Athens, Greece) (represented by: F. Rodolaki, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: K. Laurinavičius and M. Szablewska, acting as Agents, assisted by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for annulment of the decision of the Governing Council of the ECB of 28 June 2015 by which it was decided to maintain the ceiling to the provision of emergency liquidity assistance to Greek banks at the level decided on 26 June 2015 and for annulment of the decision of the Governing Council of the ECB of 6 July 2015 by which it was decided to maintain that ceiling at that same level and to adjust the haircuts on collateral accepted by the Bank of Greece in that respect, and application, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU, for compensation for the damage which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Alcimos Consulting SMPC shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 419/46

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2016 — Greenpeace Energy and Others v Commission

(Case T-382/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Nuclear energy - Aid in support of Hinkley Point C nuclear power station - Contract for difference, agreement of the Secretary of State and credit guarantee - Decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market - Absence of any significant effect on a competitive position - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 419/61)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Greenpeace Energy eG (Hamburg, Germany) and the nine other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: D. Fouquet and J. Nysten, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, T. Maxian Rusche and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Decision (EU) 2015/658 of 8 October 2014 on the aid measure SA.34947 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N) which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for support to the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (OJ 2015 L 109, p. 44).

Operative part of the order

The Court orders as follows:

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by NNB Generation Company Limited, the Slovak Republic, Hungary, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the French Republic, the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland.

3. Greenpeace Energy eG and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

4. Greenpeace Energy and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex, the Commission, NNB Generation Company Limited, the Slovak Republic, Hungary, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the French Republic, the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland shall bear their own respective costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/35

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

(Case T-705/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/58)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/61

Order of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — EFB v Commission

(Case T-151/15) (1)

(2017/C 144/89)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/56

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — Commission v CINAR

(Case T-720/15) (1)

(2017/C 006/70)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 5/51

Order of the General Court of 23 October 2017 — 1&1 Telecom v Commission

(Case T-307/15) (1)

(2018/C 005/69)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 231/53

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2017 — Facebook v EUIPO — Brand IP Licensing (lovebook)

(Case T-757/15) (1)

(2017/C 231/69)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.