Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2014 — Italy v Commission

(Case C‑385/13 P) ( 1 )

‛Appeal — European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Campania Regional Operational Programme (ROP) 2000‑2006 — Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Article 32(3)(f) — Infringement procedure in respect of the Italian Republic concerning waste management in the Campania region — Decision not to make interim payments in connection with the ROP measure concerning waste management and disposal’

1. Appeals — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 169(2)) (see paras 59, 60, 101)

2. Appeals — Grounds — Plea seeking to call into question a situation of fact or of law previously recognised by the applicant — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 67)

3. Appeals — Grounds — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 82)

4. Appeals — Grounds — Inadequate statement of reasons — Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning — Lawfulness — Conditions (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 81) (see para. 87)

5. Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Assessment of the duty to state reasons in accordance with the circumstances of the case (Art. 253 EC) (see paras 113, 114)

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2014 — Italy v Commission

(Case C‑385/13 P) ( 1 )

‛Appeal — European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Campania Regional Operational Programme (ROP) 2000‑2006 — Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Article 32(3)(f) — Infringement procedure in respect of the Italian Republic concerning waste management in the Campania region — Decision not to make interim payments in connection with the ROP measure concerning waste management and disposal’

1. Appeals — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 169(2)) (see paras 59, 60, 101)

2. Appeals — Grounds — Plea seeking to call into question a situation of fact or of law previously recognised by the applicant — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 67)

3. Appeals — Grounds — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 82)

4. Appeals — Grounds — Inadequate statement of reasons — Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning — Lawfulness — Conditions (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 81) (see para. 87)

5. Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Assessment of the duty to state reasons in accordance with the circumstances of the case (Art. 253 EC) (see paras 113, 114)

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.