14

Article 32 of that law, which concerns the principles governing the liability of public authorities, provides: ‘1. Individuals shall be entitled to compensation from the relevant public authorities for any damage to their property or infringement of their rights where that damage or infringement is the result of the normal or abnormal operation of public services, except in cases of force majeure or of loss or harm which, by law, the individual is legally required to bear. The annulment, by administrative means or by the contentious-administrative courts, of administrative acts or provisions shall not, in itself, give rise to a right to compensation. 2. In any event, the loss or harm claimed must be genuine, economically assessable and particular to a person or to a group of people. 3. Similarly, individuals shall also be entitled to compensation from public authorities for any damage to their property or infringement of their rights arising from the application of legislative acts that are not acts ordering the expropriation of rights which they are not required by law to bear, where the legislative acts in question so provide and subject to the conditions laid down therein. The State legislature may also be made liable in the following situations, provided that the conditions laid down in the preceding paragraphs are satisfied: (a) where the loss or harm stems from the application of a legislative provision declared unconstitutional, provided that the requirements referred to in paragraph 4 are met; (b) where the loss or harm stems from the application of a provision that is contrary to [EU] law, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5. 4. If the loss or harm is the result of a legislative provision declared to be unconstitutional, the individual may be awarded compensation if he or she has obtained, before any court, a final decision dismissing an action brought against the administrative act that caused the loss or harm, provided that the individual invoked the unconstitutionality that was subsequently recognised. 5. If the loss or harm is the result of the application of a provision declared to be contrary to [EU] law, the individual may be awarded compensation if he or she has obtained, before any court, a final decision dismissing an action brought against the administrative act that caused the loss or harm, provided that the individual relied on the breach of [EU] law that was subsequently recognised. In addition, all the following conditions must be met: (a) the rule of law must be intended to confer rights on individuals; (b) the breach must be sufficiently serious; and (c) there must be a direct causal link between the non-compliance with the obligation imposed on the responsible authority by [EU] law and the loss or harm suffered by the individuals. 6. The decision finding the legislative provision to be unconstitutional or declaring it contrary to [EU] law shall produce effects from its publication in the “Boletín Oficial del Estado” or in the “Official Journal of the European Union”, as appropriate, unless otherwise provided for in that decision. 7. The responsibility of the state for the proper functioning of the Judiciary shall be governed by [Ley Orgánica 6/1985 del Poder Judicial (Organic Law 6/1985 on the judiciary) of 1 July 1985]. …’