ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 52/23

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2013 — Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Jacson of Scandinavia AB

(Case C-159/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Community trade mark JACKSON SHOES - Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national business name Jacson of Scandinavia AB - Declaration of invalidity - Manifest inadmissibility)

2014/C 52/40

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Appellant: Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda (represented by: A.J. Rodrigues, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Guimarães and G. Schneider, Agents), Jacson of Scandinavia AB

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 January 2013 in Case T-474/09 Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda v OHIM, Jacson of Scandinavia AB, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 August 2009 (Case R 1253/2008-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Jacson of Scandinavia AB and Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços Lda is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/17

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 February 2014 — Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission

(Case C-223/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 93/2013 - Referral to the General Court of the European Union))

2014/C 175/20

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman and J. Langer, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Clausen and P. Van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 93/2013 of 1 February 2013 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 concerning harmonised indices of consumer prices, as regards establishing owner-occupied housing price indices (OJ 2013 L 33, p. 14)

Operative part of the order

1. Refer Case C-223/13 back to the General Court of the European Union.

2. Costs are reserved.

(1) OJ C 189, 29.06.2013
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/30

Order of the President of the Court of 21 October 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-321/13) (1)

2014/C 102/48

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/24

Order of the President of Court of 24 February 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Erich Pickert (C-347/13), Jürgen Hein (C-353/13), Hjördis Hein (C-353/13) v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Joined Cases C-347/13 and C-353/13) (1)

2014/C 184/39

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the cases be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/23

Order of the President of the Court of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance de Quimper — France) — CA Consumer Finance v Francine Crouan, née Weber, Tual Crouan

(Case C-77/13) (1)

2014/C 184/35

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/5

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bardejov — Slovakia) — Pohotovosť s. r. o. v Ján Soroka

(Case C-153/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Scope ratione temporis - Events preceding the accession of the Slovak Republic to the European Union - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 261/06

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Okresný súd Bardejov

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pohotovosť s. r. o.

Defendant: Ján Soroka

Intervener: Združenie na ochranu občana spotrebiteľa HOOS

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Okresný súd Bardejov (Slovakia) by decision of 15 February 2013.

(1) OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/5

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 June 2014 — Bimbo SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-285/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8 - Application for Community figurative mark Caffè KIMBO - Opposition proceedings - Earlier national word mark BIMBO - Well-known mark - Partial rejection of the opposition - Appeal manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 261/07

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Bimbo SA (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Café do Brasil SpA (represented by: M. Mostardini and F. Mellucci, avvocati)

Operative part of the order

1) The appeal is dismissed.

2) Bimbo SA shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/8

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Sanco, SA

(Case C-411/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Figurative mark representing a chicken - Opposition of the proprietor of a national figurative mark representing a chicken - Partial rejection of the opposition))

2014/C 261/12

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Sanco, SA (represented by: A. Segura Roda, abogado)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/18

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 13 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Wagenborg Passagiersdiensten BV, Eigen Veerdienst Terschelling BV, MPS Stortemelk BV, MPS Willem Barentsz BV, Ms Spathoek NV, GAF Lakeman trading as Rederij Waddentransport v Minister van Infrastructuur en Milieu, in the presence of: Wagenborg Passagiersdiensten BV, Terschellinger Stoombootmaatschappij BV

(Case C-207/13) (1)

2014/C 261/29

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/23

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — Erich Kastenholz v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Qwatchme A/S

(Case C-435/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Community designs - Articles 4 to 6, 25(1)(b) and (f), and 52 - Registered Community design representing watch dials - Earlier Community design - Invalidity proceedings))

2014/C 409/33

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Erich Kastenholz (represented by: L. Acker, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent), Qwatchme A/S (represented by: M. Zöbisch, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Kastenholz shall bear the costs.

(1) OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/29

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2014 — Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH v ultra air GmbH, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-450/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Word mark ultrafilter international - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Abuse of rights))

2014/C 315/45

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH (represented by: N. Siebertz, M. Teworte-Vey and A. Renvert, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: ultra air GmbH (represented by: C. König, Rechtsanwalt), Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/5

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte — Bulgaria) — ‘Parva Investitsionna Banka’ AD, ‘UniKredit Bulbank’ AD, ‘Siyk Faundeyshan’ LLS v ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD, Sindik na ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD

(Case C-488/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 - Definition of ‘uncontested pecuniary claims’ - Insolvency proceedings - Extra-judicial enforcement order relating to a contested claim - Claim for payment out of the insolvency estate, on the basis of such an enforcement order - Situation falling outside the scope of Regulation No 1896/2006 - Court clearly lacking jurisdiction))

(2014/C 431/09)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants:‘Parva Investitsionna Banka’ AD, ‘UniKredit Bulbank’ AD, ‘Siyk Faundeyshan’ LLS

Defendants:‘Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD, Sindik na ‘Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD

Intervening parties: Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite, ‘Aset Menidzhmant’ EAD, ‘Ol Siyz Balgaria’ OOD, ‘Si Dzhi Ef — aktsionerna obshtnost’ AD, ‘Silvar Biych’ EAD, ‘Rudersdal’ EOOD, ‘Kota Enerdzhi’ EAD, Chavdar Angelov Angelov

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte (Bulgaria).

(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/31

Order of the President of the Court of 18 August 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia supported by: Federal Republic of Germany, Kingdom of Belgium, Kingdom of the Netherlands, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Republic of Poland, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-241/13) (1)

2014/C 409/44

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/10

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Suceava — Romania) — Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Botoşani v Polixeni Guletsou

(Case C-598/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Identical question referred - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 7(2)(c) - Applicability of social security conventions between Member States - Repatriated refugee whose country of origin is a Member State - Completion of periods of employment in the territory of another Member State - Application for grant of an old-age benefit - Refusal))

(2015/C 213/15)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Suceava

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Botoşani

Defendant: Polixeni Guletsou

Operative part of the order

Article 7(2)(c) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, in the version amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1992/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that a bilateral agreement, relating to the social security benefits of nationals of one of the signatory States having had the status of political refugees in the territory of the other signatory State, concluded on a date when one of the two signatory States had not yet acceded to the European Union and not appearing in Annex III to that regulation, does not continue to apply to the situation of political refugees repatriated to their State of origin before the bilateral agreement was concluded and that regulation entered into force.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/8

Order of the Court of 11 February 2015 — Orange v European Commission, French Republic, Département des Hauts-de-Seine, Sequalum SAS

(Case C-621/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - Compensation for public service costs relating to the establishment and operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network))

(2015/C 146/12)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Orange S.A. (represented by: D. Gillet and H. Viane, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromssky and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents), French Republic (represented by: J. Bousin and M.D. Colas, Agents), Departement des Hauts-de-Seine (represented by: G. O’Mahony, avocat), Sequalum SAS (represented by: L. Feldman, avocat)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Orange S.A. is ordered to pay the costs of the European Commission, French Republic, Département des Hauts-de-Seine, Sequalum SAS.

(1) OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti, Sezione Giurisdizionale per la Regione Puglia — Italy) — Vittoria De Bellis, Diana Perrone, Cesaria Antonia Villani v Istituto Nazionale di Previdenza per i Dipendenti dell’Amministrazione Pubblica (INPDAP)

(Case C-246/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - National legislation providing, with retroactive effect, for a reduction in pension entitlements - Purely internal situation - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2015/C 016/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte dei Conti, Sezione Giurisdizionale per la Regione Puglia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Vittoria De Bellis, Diana Perrone, Cesaria Antonia Villani

Defendant: Istituto Nazionale di Previdenza per i Dipendenti dell’Amministrazione Pubblica (INPDAP)

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to reply to the questions referred by the Corte dei conti, sezione giurisdizionale per la Regione Puglia (Italy), by decision of 28 April 2014 (Case C-246/14).

(1) OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/32

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 June 2014 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla — Hungary) — Criminal proceedings against István Balázs, Dániel Papp

(Case C-45/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Fundamental rights - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 47, 50 and 54 - Implementation of EU law - Lack - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 315/52

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Ítélőtábla

Criminal proceedings against

István Balázs, Dániel Papp

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla (Hungary) by order of 21 January 2014.

(1) OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 65/16

Order of the Court of 11 December 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Viseu — Portugal) — Agrocaramulo — Empreendimentos Agro-Pecuários do Caramulo SA v Instituto de Financiamento da Agficultura e Pescas, IP (IFAP)

(Case C-70/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 - Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Export refunds - Poultrymeat - ‘Cull hens’ - Agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds - Classification))

(2015/C 065/23)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Viseu

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agrocaramulo — Empreendimentos Agro-Pecuários do Caramulo SA

Defendant: Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas, IP (IFAP)

Operative part of the order

Annex I to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 of 17 December 1987 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds, as most recently amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2091/2005 of 15 December 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that laying hens put down at the end of their laying period, when their skeleton is completely ossified, known as ‘cull hens’, do not fall within the description ‘others’ under product headings 0207 12 10 9900 and 0207 12 90 9190 set out in that annex.

(1) OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/17

Order of the President of the Court of 12 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Brunhilde Liebler, Helmut Liebler v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-365/14) (1)

(2014/C 431/30)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 329, 22.9.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/20

Order of the President of the Court of 18 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 3 de Ávila — Spain) — Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria, SA v Francisco Javier Rodríguez Barbero, María Ángeles Barbero Gutiérrez

(Case C-75/14) (1)

(2015/C 213/32)

Language of the case: Spain

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/10

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Aosta — Italy) — Equitalia Nord SpA v CLR di Camelliti Serafino & C. Snc

(Case C-68/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 106 TFEU and 107 TFEU - Competition - Concept of ‘State aid’ - National legislation - Use of buildings for institutional purposes - Rent reduction - Factual and regulatory background to the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Need for a reply to the questions referred - Lack of information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2015/C 146/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Aosta

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Equitalia Nord SpA

Defendant: CLR di Camelliti Serafino & C. Snc

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Aosta (Italy), by decision of 12 December 2013, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/10

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — Basic AG Lebensmittelhandel v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Repsol YPF, SA

(Case C-400/14 P) (1)

((Appeals - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Application for registration of a Community figurative mark - Word element ‘basic’ - Earlier Community figurative mark - Word element ‘BASIC’ - Opposition by the proprietor of that mark - Partial refusal of registration - Concepts of ‘distribution services’ and of ‘retail and wholesale services’ - Scope))

(2015/C 320/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Basic AG Lebensmittelhandel (represented by: D. Altenburg and T. Haug, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Repsol YPF, SA (represented by: J.-B. Devaureix, abogado)

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal.

2. Orders Basic AG Lebensmittelhandel to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/21

Order of the President of the Court of 30 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — Provident Financial s. r. o. v Zdeněk Sobotka, in the presence of: Združenie na ochranu občana spotrebiteľa HOOS

(Case C-372/14) (1)

(2015/C 213/37)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 398/7

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2015 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — Manuel Orrego Arias v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real

(Case C-456/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2001/40/EC - Mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third country nationals - Article 3(1)(a) - Concept of ‘offence punishable by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty of at least one year’ - Decision on the expulsion of a third country national owing to a criminal conviction - Situation which is not covered by Directive 2001/40 - Manifest lack of jurisdiction))

(2015/C 398/08)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Manuel Orrego Arias

Defendant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) by decision of 4 September 2014 (Case C-456/14).

(1) OJ C 439, 8.12.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/25

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 17 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — CD Consulting s.r.o. v Anna Pančurová, Róbert Demeter, Kristína Pužová, Katarína Harakľová, Roman Novák, Marcela Grundzová, Milan Pulko, Peter Chomča, Jarmila Lešková, Katarína Malarová, Jana Belajová, Tatiana Kučkovská, Marián Demeter, Helena Chomčová, Marcela Troščáková, Nataša Virágová, Kvetuša Hudáková, Peter Grundza, Dávid Renner, Zdenko Ričalka, Jarmila Kurejová, Mária Maxinová

(Case C-328/14) (1)

(2015/C 320/35)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.