ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 362/25

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Hecq v Commission

(Case F-12/11) (1)

(Civil service - Occupational disease - Invalidity procedure - Application to resume professional activity - Application for damages and interest)

2011/C 362/43

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Hecq (Chaumont-Gistoux, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the implied decision rejecting the applicant’s request to resume his professional activities and for full payment of his remuneration as an official, calculated from 1 August 2003, and for damages, plus default interest calculated at a rate of 7 % per annum from 1 August 2003.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Hecq shall pay the entirety of the costs.

(1) OJ C 113, 9.4.11, p. 22.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 46/31

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 23 October 2012 — Possanzini v Frontex

(Case F-61/11) (1)

(Civil service - Temporary staff - Procedure relating to the renewal of a temporary staff contract - Communication to the staff member of the negative opinion of the reporting officer as regards renewal - Act adversely affecting an official - None - Application for annulment of unfavourable comments on performance in annual appraisal reports - Action manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 46/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Daniele Possanzini (Warsaw, Poland)) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) (represented by: S. Vuorensola and H. Caniard, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Civil Service — Application for annulment of the decision to revoke the decision to renew the applicant’s contract of employment as a member of the temporary staff and for annulment of some parts of his assessment reports for the period from August 2006 to December 2009

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Possanzini shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 226, 30.7.2011, p. 32.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 138/40

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 November 2011 — AC v Council

(Case F-26/11) (1)

2012/C 138/103

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 179, 18.6.2011, p. 21.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/44

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 25 February 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-118/11) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Decision by the appointing authority to retire an official and to grant an invalidity allowance - Decision not addressing the occupational origin of the disease which justified retirement - Obligation on the appointing authority to recognise the occupational origin of the disease - Article 78, fifth paragraph, of the Staff Regulations - Need to convene a new invalidity committee - Relevance of an earlier decision adopted under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Article 76 of the Rules of Procedure - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

2014/C 102/65

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision refusing to adopt a decision concerning the occupational origin of the disease suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

2. Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012. p. 70.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 252/48

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2013 — Z v Court of Justice

(Case F-71/11) (1)

(Civil Service - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 252/84

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Z (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J.-M. Bauler, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice (represented by: A.V. Placco, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of the staff report for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 and an order that the defendant pay compensation for non-material damage.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-71/11 Z v Court of Justice.

2. The applicant shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 355, 3.12.2011, p. 30.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/86

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 14 May 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-4/12) (1)

(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the period prescribed for bringing proceedings - Lawyer’s hand-written signature different from that on the original application received by post - Application lodged out of time - Manifest inadmissibility - None)

2013/C 225/199

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: C. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision refusing the applicant’s request to forward to him all the access codes to the Internet sites accessible to all Commission officials following the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 November 2008 in Case F 41/06, annulling the Commission’s decision to retire him on grounds of invalidity.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 28.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 147/35

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 January 2013 — Brus v Commission

(Case F-79/12) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Application instituting proceedings - Formal requirements - Statement of the grounds on which the application is based - Action manifestly inadmissble)

2013/C 147/67

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Karel Brus (Zaventem, Belgium) (represented by: J. Duvekot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, J. Baquero Cruz and W. Roels, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the Commission’s decisions to dismiss the applicant from his functions and to reduce the amount of his pension following disciplinary proceedings brought finding an infringement of Article 11 of the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Brus shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 319, 20.10.2012, p. 18.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 27 January 2014 — Loescher v Council

(Case F-134/12) (1)

(2014/C 71/73)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013, p. 74.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 9/29

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 October 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-57/12) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disability allowance - Deduction of the amount of the debt owed to an institution - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any basis in law)

2014/C 9/48

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decisions to reduce the amount of the applicant’s disability allowance for the months June to September 2011, for payment of interest at the rate of 15 % and payment of the sum of EUR 500.

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed on the basis that it is in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any basis in law.

2. Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the interim proceedings in Cases F-57/12 R and T-464/12 P(R).

3. Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay to the General Court the sum of EUR 2 000.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012, p. 37.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/39

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 June 2016 — Poniskaitis v Commission

(Case F-152/12) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Proposals concerning additional pensionable years - Act not having an adverse effect - Inadmissibility of the action - Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 410/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jonas Poniskaitis (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, then D. de Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, subsequently J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and, lastly, J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially D. Martin and G. Gattinara, Agents, then J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, subsequently G. Gattinara, Agent, and, lastly, G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to calculate on the basis of the new GIP the amounts to be credited of the applicant’s pension rights acquired before he entered the service of the Commission.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Jonas Poniskaitis shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 71, 9/3/2013, p. 30.
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 may 2016 — Bandier i v Commission
(Case F-91/12) (1)
(2016/C 222/58)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register . 
(1) OJ C 331, 27/10/2012, p. 33.
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 Apr il 2016 — Peders en v Commission
(Case F-144/12) (1)
(2016/C 222/59)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be remove d from the register . 
(1) OJ C 26, 26/1/2013, p. 77.
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 Apr il 2016 — Sommier v Commission
(Case F-147/12) (1)
(2016/C 222/60)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be remove d from the register . 
(1) OJ C 55, 23/2/2013, p. 26.
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 Apr il 2016 — UB (*) v Commission
(Case F-35/13) (1)
(2016/C 222/61)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be remove d from the register . 
(1) OJ C 207, 20/7/2013, p. 58.20.6.2016 EN Official Jour nal of the European Union C 222/45
___________
(*) Information erased or replaced within the framework of protec tion of personal data and/or confide ntiality .
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 313/35

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-31/13)

(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the period for bringing proceedings, extended on account of distance by a period of ten days - Application received by post within the following ten days - Applications not the same - Action out of time)

2013/C 313/66

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Re:

Action to annul the dismissal of the applicant’s application requesting payment of compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered following his reassignment from the Commission delegation in Luanda to the Commission headquarters in Brussels.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 22 September 2014 — Loescher v Council

(Case F-108/13) (1)

(2014/C 395/85)

Language of the case: French

The President of the 3rd Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25/1/2014, p. 41.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 December 2013 — JJ (*1) v Council

(Case F-47/13) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2012 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant - Interinstitutional transfer in the course of the promotion procedure preceding that during which a promotion decision would have taken effect - Institution which is competent to take a decision on promotion of the transferred official)

(2014/C 71/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: JJ (*1) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials in function group AD proposed for promotion in 2012.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being manifestly devoid of any basis in law.

2. JJ (*1) shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(*1) Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 63.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/49

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-90/13) (1)

((Exclusion of the representative of a party from the proceedings - Failure to designate a new representative - Applicant no longer responding to communications from the Tribunal - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 146/67)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A., lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s requests for compensation for the harm suffered as a result of the infringement alleged of the applicant’s right to confidentiality caused by the defendant’s sending a letter concerning him to a lawyer who did not represent him.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case F-90/13 Marcuccio v Commission.

2. Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014, p. 40.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 421/56

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 February 2014 — Probst v Commission

(Case F-75/13) (1)

((Staff cases - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Request for re-examination - Material new facts - Action manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 421/80

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Norbert Probst (Genval, Belgium) (represented by: initially, D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and subsequently by D. Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to grant the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Probst shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 274 of 21/09/2013, p. 34.
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 1 August 2016 — Sajewicz-Świackiewcz v Commission

(Case F-39/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Decision on recognition of additional pensionable years applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 364/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jolanta Sajewicz-Świackiewcz (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by: D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, subsequently by D. de Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, then by J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and lastly by J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: C. Ehrbar and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, subsequently by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, then by G. Gattinara, acting as Agent, and lastly by G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision fixing the credit for the pension rights acquired prior to entry into service at the Commission pursuant to the new GIP and the decision rejecting the complaint.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 60.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 May 2016 — Schmidt v Commission

(Case F-69/13) (1)

(2016/C 222/64)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 274, 21/9/2013, p. 31.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 34/49

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — Iliopoulou v Europol

(Case F-21/14) (1)

((Civil service - Europol staff - Europol Convention - Europol Staff Regulations - Decision 2009/371/JHA - Application of the Conditions of Employment to Europol staff - Non-renewal of a temporary fixed-term contract - Refusal to grant a temporary contract for an indefinite term))

(2015/C 034/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Hariklia Iliopoulou (Wassenaar, Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Police Office (represented by: J. Arnould and D. Neumann, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision to not renew, for an indefinite duration, the applicant’s fixed-term contract and to order Europol to pay her the difference between the amount of remuneration to which she would have been entitled had she continued to carry out her duties and the unemployment benefits or any other allowance in lieu which she has received.

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed.

2. The European Police Office shall bear its own costs and is ordered to cover half of the costs incurred by Ms Iliopoulou.

3. Ms Iliopoulou shall bear half of her own costs.

(1) OJ C 184 of 16/6/2014, p. 42.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 48/100

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 7 December 2015 — Probst v Commission

(Case F-136/14) (1)

((Civil service - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Former parliamentary assistant - Commission’s decision to grant the expatriation allowance to former parliamentary assistants as of the date of publication of the information given to staff - Judgments annulling a measure - Substantial new facts - Limited temporal effect - Res judicata - Administrative decisions which have become final - Equal treatment))

(2016/C 048/115)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Norbert Probst (Genval, Belgium) (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Currall and T.S. Bohr, Agents, and subsequently T.S. Bohr, Agent)

Re:

Application by the applicant for annulment of the Commission’s decision granting him, with retrospective effect, the expatriation allowance, in so far as the retrospective effect extends merely to 1 September 2013, and the applicant claims that the Commission should grant him that allowance as of his recruitment by the Commission on 1 July 1999.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2. Mr Probst shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 34, 2.2.2015, p. 54.
Case F-142/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 July 2015 — De Almeida Pereira v Eurojust (Civil service — Eurojust staff — Member of the temporary staff — Vacancy notice — Candidate selection procedure — Examination of applications by a selection board — Admission to the next stage of the selection procedure — Conditions — Scoring of selection criteria — Required points threshold — Rejection of application — Action manifestly lacking any basis in law — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 July 2015 — De Almeida Pereira v Eurojust

(Case F-142/14) ( 1 )

‛(Civil service — Eurojust staff — Member of the temporary staff — Vacancy notice — Candidate selection procedure — Examination of applications by a selection board — Admission to the next stage of the selection procedure — Conditions — Scoring of selection criteria — Required points threshold — Rejection of application — Action manifestly lacking any basis in law — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)’

Parties

Applicant: Manuel Antonio De Almeida Pereira (Voorburg, Netherlands) (represented by: E.H. Schulze, lawyer)

Defendant: Eurojust (represented by: C. Deboyser and J. Carmona-Bermejo, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Annulment of the decision not to admit the applicant to the second phase of the selection procedure, in the context of his candidature for the post of Advisor to the Office of the President of Eurojust.

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2) Mr De Almeida Pereira is to bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by Eurojust.

( 1 ) OJ C 81, 9/3/2015, p. 30.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 1 August 2016 — Poniskaitis v Commission

(Case F-133/14) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Decision on recognition of additional pensionable years applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 364/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jonas Poniskaitis (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis, R. Metz and D. Verbeke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by G. Gattinara, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights to the EU Pension scheme which applies the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 16, 19.1.2015, p. 50.