ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2020 — KN v EESC

(Case T-377/20 R)

(Application for interim relief - Civil service - Member of the EESC - Harassment - OLAF investigation - EESC Bureau decision - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

(2020/C 348/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KN (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and M. Aboud, lawyers)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, I. Pouli and A. Carvajal García-Valdecasas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, suspension of enforcement of the decision of the EESC of 9 June 2020 by which the applicant was discharged from all supervisory and personnel management activities and, second, provisional suspension of the delivery of that decision to the institutions of the European Union and certain bodies of the Member States.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 3 March 2020 — Junqueras i Vies v European Parliament

(Case T-24/20 R)

(Interim measures - Institutional law - Members of the Parliament - Expiry of mandate - Parliamentary immunity - Application for interim measures - Partial inadmissibility - No prima facie case)

(2020/C 137/82)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Oriol Junqueras i Vies (Sant Joan de Vilatorrada, Spain) (represented by A. Van den Eynde, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by N. Lorenz and C. Burgos, agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, inter alia, suspension of enforcement of the decision of the European Parliament of 13 January 2020, declaring the seat of the applicant to be vacant as from 3 January 2020 and rejecting the application submitted on 20 December 2019 for urgent measures to protect his parliamentary immunity.

Operative part

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 6 October 2020 — Sharpston v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-184/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Letter from the President of the Court of Justice inviting the Member States to provide for the appointment of an Advocate General - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 433/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Eleanor Sharpston (Schoenfels, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Forwood, Barrister)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: J. Inghelram and Á. Almendros Manzano, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision contained in the letter of the President of the Court of Justice of 31 January 2020 addressed to the President of the Council of the European Union inviting the Member States to provide for the appointment of an Advocate General to the post currently held by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Eleanor Sharpston shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2020 — IF v Parliament

(Case T-36/20) (1)

(2020/C 348/40)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.
Order of the General Court of 15 December 2020 — Junqueras i Vies v Parliament

(Case T-24/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Member of European Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Announcement by the President of the European Parliament of the establishment of the vacancy of a Member of the European Parliament’s seat - Request to take urgently an initiative to assert the privileges and immunities of a Member of the European Parliament - Acts not open to judicial review - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 53/55)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Oriol Junqueras i Vies (Sant Joan de Vilatorrada, Spain) (represented by: A. Van den Eynde Adroer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: F. Drexler, N. Görlitz and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment, first, of the establishment of a vacancy of the applicant’s seat as from 3 January 2020, announced by the President of the Parliament at the plenary session of 13 January 2020 and, second, of the alleged rejection by the latter of the request to take urgently an initiative seeking to assert the immunity of the applicant, submitted on 20 December 2019 in his name by Ms Riba I Giner, Member of the European Parliament, on the basis of Article 8 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to rule on the application to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain.

3. Mr Oriol Junqueras I Vies shall pay the costs, including those incurred in Case T-24/20 R.

4. The Kingdom of Spain shall bear the costs relating to its application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Order of the General Court of 29 October 2020 — Isopix v Parliament

(Case T-163/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for compensation - Public supply contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of photography services - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer - Cancellation of the procurement procedure - Action which has become, in part, devoid of purpose - No need, in part, to adjudicate - Order - Appeal in part brought before a court manifestly lacking in jurisdiction to hear it)

(2021/C 19/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Isopix SA (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented by: P. Van den Bulck and J. Fahner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Wójcik and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 24 March 2020 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the context of the call for tenders COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854, entitled ‘Provision of Photography Services — Photographic Coverage of the Current Affairs and Institutional Activities of the European Parliament’, and informing the applicant that the contract had been awarded to another tenderer, and of the letter of the Parliament of 17 April 2020 informing the applicant of the rejection of its tender submitted in the context of the call for tenders COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 on the grounds that it did not meet the selection criteria relating to financial and economic standing and, secondly, application based, primarily, on Article 266 TFEU seeking an order that the Parliament re-examine the tenders and, in the alternative, on Article 268 TFEU, seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it seeks the annulment of the European Parliament’s decision of 24 March 2020 rejecting the tender submitted by Isopix SA in the context of the call for tenders COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854, entitled ‘Provision of Photography Services — Photographic Coverage of the Current Affairs and Institutional Activities of the European Parliament’, and informing it that the contract had been awarded to another tenderer, and of the letter of the Parliament of 17 April 2020 informing Isopix SA of the rejection of its tender submitted in the context of the call for tenders COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 on the grounds that it did not meet the selection criteria relating to financial and economic standing.

2. The action is dismissed as to the remainder for having been brought before a court manifestly lacking in jurisdiction to hear it.

3. The Parliament shall bear the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Hub Culture v EUIPO — PayPal (VEN)

(Case T-16/20) (1)

(2021/C 88/62)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 December 2020 — IM v EIB and EIF

(Case T-80/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Post of Director-General of the EIF - Rejection of the applicant’s candidature - Appointment of another candidate - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 62/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: IM (represented by: D. Giabbani, lawyer)

Defendants: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, G. Faedo and M. Loizou, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers), European Investment Fund (represented by: N. Panayotopoulos and F. Dascalescu, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the EIF of 11 December 2019 appointing a new Director-General of the EIF.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. IM shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 103, 30.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 March 2021 — SATSE v Commission

(Case T-484/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public health - Annex III to Directive 2000/54/EC - List of biological agents known to infect humans - Directive (EU) 2020/739 - Inclusion of SARS-CoV-2 - Inclusion in risk group 3 of biological agents known to infect humans - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 206/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Sindicato de Enfermería (SATSE) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Sesmero González, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Valero and N. Ruiz García, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Directive (EU) 2020/739 of 3 June 2020 amending Annex III to Directive 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the inclusion of SARS-CoV-2 in the list of biological agents known to infect humans and amending Commission Directive (EU) 2019/1833 (OJ 2020 L 175, p. 11).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany.

3. Sindicato de Enfermería (SATSE) shall pay the costs of the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

4. SATSE, the Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany shall bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 304, 14.9.2020.
Order of the General Court of 8 March 2021 — KG v Parliament

(Case T-251/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Pension - Entitlement to the correction coefficient in the determination of pension rights - Refusal to adopt a position on the applicant’s request - No act adversely affecting an official - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 163/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KG (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: T. Lazian and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment of the Parliament’s letter of 30 August 2019 by which it refused to adopt a decision concerning the application of the correction coefficient in the future determination of the applicant’s pension rights and of the decision rejecting the complaint lodged against that letter and, secondly, compensation for the non-material harm which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. KG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 May 2021 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM)

(Case T-262/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 278/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rochem Group AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rochem Marine Srl (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: R. Gioia and L. Mansi, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2020 (Case R 1546/2019-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Rochem Marine and Rochem Group.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Rochem Group AG and Rochem Marine Srl.

(1) OJ C 222, 6.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 April 2021 — Jouvin v Commission

(Case T-472/20 and T-472/20 AJ II) (1)

(Action for annulment - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for the collection, tracking and distribution of parcels - Decision rejecting a complaint - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law - Application for legal aid submitted after an action had been brought)

(2021/C 252/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Frédéric Jouvin (Clichy, France) (represented by: L. Bôle-Richard, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Ernst, A. Keidel and A. Boitos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 3503 final of 28 May 2020 rejecting the complaint submitted by the applicant concerning alleged infringements of Article 101 TFEU.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. The application for legal aid is rejected.

3. Mr Frédéric Jouvin shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.
Order of the General Court of 8 June 2021 — Shindler and Others v Council

(Case T-198/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Area of freedom, security and justice - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom - Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on withdrawal - United Kingdom nationals - Loss of EU citizenship - Act not of individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 310/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Harry Shindler (Porto d’Ascoli, Italy) and the nine other applicants, whose names are included in the annex to the order (represented by: J. Fouchet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and J. Ciantar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment, in whole or in part, of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 7) and of Council Decision (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the European Commission and by British in Europe.

3. Mr Harry Shindler and the other applicants whose names are included in the annex are ordered to pay, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the Council of the European Union, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

4. Mr Shindler and the other applicants whose names are included in the annex, the Council, the Commission and British in Europe shall bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT5)

(Case T-422/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GT5 - Earlier EU figurative mark GT - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Relevant public - Level of attention - Action manifestly well founded)

(2021/C 310/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1600/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe and Huawei Technologies.

Operative part of the order

1. The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1600/2019-4) is annulled.

2. EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd.

(1) OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 September 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Unión Detallistas Españoles (unit)

(Case T-344/20) (1)

(2021/C 471/92)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Order of the General Court of 28 July 2021 — Csordas and Others v Commission

(Case T-146/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Regularity of the elections for the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee - Presentation of a joint list of six trade unions or professional organisations - Supervisory obligation of the institution - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 412/07)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Annamaria Csordas (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Adrian Sorin Cristescu (Luxembourg), Jean Putz (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg), Miguel Vicente-Nunez (Luxembourg) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr, T. Lilamand and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment or a declaration that the Commission’s failure to prevent or censure a number of acts or omissions relating to the November 2019 elections to the Luxembourg local section of the Commission's Staff Committee is unlawful; second, annulment of the Commission’s memorandum of 28 November 2019 concerning the calculation of the representativeness of representative trade unions and professional organisations in the institution; and third, the annulment of any decision concerning the allocation of additional resources to the trade unions or professional organisations signatories to the representativeness agreement of 14 October 2019 in relation to those available to them on the basis of the representativeness that had been conferred on them following the 2016 elections of the Luxembourg local section of the Staff Committee.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The applicants shall pay the costs, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 November 2021 — Advansa Manufacturing and Others v Commission

(Case T-741/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021 - Eligible sectors - Exclusion of the man-made fibres manufacturing sector - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 73/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Advansa Manufacturing GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) and the 14 other applicants whose names are set out in an annex to the order (represented by: D. Haverbeke, L. Ruessmann and P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and G. Braga da Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment in part of the Communication from the Commission of 25 September 2020 entitled ‘Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021’ (OJ 2020 C 317, p. 5).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. Advansa Manufacturing GmbH and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear the costs relating to its application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 October 2021 — TrekStor v EUIPO (e.Gear)

(Case T-708/20) (1)

(2021/C 513/55)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
Order of the General Court of 4 March 2022 — KI v eu-LISA

(Case T-338/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Internal reorganisation of the services of eu-LISA - Filling posts by reassignment - Interests of the service - Correspondence between the grade and the post - No act adversely affecting the applicant - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 198/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KI (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) (represented by: K. Czekalowski and M. Chiodi, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of eu-LISA of 15 July 2019 to reassign the applicant following the internal reorganisation of the services of that agency, and second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. KI shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Senseon Tech v EUIPO — Accuride International (SENSEON)

(Case T-724/20) (1)

(2022/C 119/83)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.