ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 January 2019 — Agrochem-Maks v Commission

(Case T-574/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Plant-protection products - Active substance oxasulfuron - Non-renewal of approval for placing on the market - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency - Balancing of interests))

(2019/C 93/84)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by A. Lewis, I. Naglis and G. Koleva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1019 of 18 July 2018 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance oxasulfuron, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2018 L 183, p. 14).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 December 2018 — Hamburg Beer Company v EUIPO (Hamburg BEER COMPANY)

(Case T-5/18) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark Hamburg BEER COMPANY - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2019/C 65/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hamburg Beer Company GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2017 (Case R 436/2017-5) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign Hamburg BEER COMPANY as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Hamburg Beer Company GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 72, 26.2.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 5 February 2019 — Trifolio-M and Others v EFSA

(Case T-675/18 R)

(Application for interim measures - Plant protection products - Procedure for reviewing the approval of the active substance azadirachtin - Rejection of the request for confidential treatment - No prima facie case)

(2019/C 139/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Trifolio-M GmbH (Lahnau, Germany), Oxon Italia SpA (Milan, Italy), Mitsui AgriScience International SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mereu and S. Englebert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Food Safety Authority (represented by: D. Detken and S. Gabbi, acting as Agents, assisted by S. Raes, lawyer)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of the decision of the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority on the requests for confidentiality made in relation to the conclusions on the Peer Review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Azadirachtin of 11 September 2018 (EFSA/LA/DEC/19777743/2018).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 20 November 2018, Trifolio-M and Others v EFSA, (T-675/18 R) is cancelled.
Order of the General Court of 8 February 2019 — Front Polisario v Council

(Case T-376/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - International agreements - Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco - Decision authorising the opening of negotiations between the European Union and Morocco for the purpose of amending the partnership agreement - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 131/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) (represented by: G. Devers, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado and F. Naert, Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 for annulment of the Council’s decision of 16 April 2018, authorising the opening of negotiations with the Kingdom of Morocco for the purpose of amending the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco and concluding a protocol implementing that agreement.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the French Republic and the European Commission.

3. The Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia-el-Hamra et du Rio de Oro (Front Polisario) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

4. The Commission and the French Republic shall bear their own respective costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 319, 10.9.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 April 2019 — Dermatest v EUIPO (DERMATEST)

(Case T-495/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark DERMATEST - Refusal of registration - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 213/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek, D. Hanf and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2018 (Case R 426/2018-4), relating to an application for registration of the word sign DERMATEST as an EU trade mark

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2019 — Telenet v Commission

(Case T-470/18) (1)

(2019/C 164/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — RATP v Commission

(Case T-422/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a procedure initiated by the Commission against a Member State - Documents originating from the applicant - Third party access request - Initial decision to grant partial access - Lack of purpose - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 230/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Régie autonome des transports parisiens (RATP) (Paris, France) (represented initially by: E. Morgan de Rivery, P. Delelis and C. Lavin, and subsequently by P. Delelis and C. Lavin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet, W. Mölls and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport of 5 March 2018 on a request for access to documents originating from the RATP in so far as it grants partial access to those documents.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Régie autonome des transports parisiens (RATP) is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 May 2019 — Zott v EUIPO — TSC Food Products (Ready-to-eat rectangular cake)

(Case T-517/18) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Community design representing a ready-to-eat rectangular cake - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - No different overall impression - Designer’s degree of freedom - Informed user - Article 4(1), Article 6(1)(b) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 230/65)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Zott SE & Co. KG (Mertingen, Germany) (represented by: E. Schalast, R. Lange and C. Böhler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: TSC Food Products GmbH (Wels, Austria) (represented by: M. Gaderer, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 June 2018 (Case R 1341/2017-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between TSC Food Products and Zott.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Zott SE & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.
Order of the General Court of 6 September 2019 — Romańska v Frontex

(Case T-212/18) (1)

(Civil Service - Contract Staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Termination - Grounds for termination - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Discrimination and psychological harassment - Compensation claim - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 363/20)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Karolina Romańska (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: A. Tetkowska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: H. Caniard and S. Drew, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Currall and G. Ostaszewski, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 14 June 2017 by which the Executive Director of Frontex, acting as the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment, terminated the applicant’s employment contract with effect at the end of an eight-month notice period and, secondly, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered on account of discrimination and psychological harassment by Frontex which culminated in the decision to terminate her contract.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Karolina Romańska shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 200, 11.6.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 June 2019 — Fugro v Commission

(Case T-317/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Galileo satellite navigation programme - Technical and operational specifications - Lack of individual concern - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 295/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fugro NV (Leidschendam, Netherlands) (represented by: initially, T. Snoep and V. van Weperen and, subsequently, V. van Weperen, H. Gornall and J. de Pree, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, L. Armati and B. Sasinowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/321 of 2 March 2018 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/224 setting out the technical and operational specifications allowing the commercial service offered by the system established under the Galileo programme to fulfil the function referred to in Article 2(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2018 L 62, p. 34), and, in the alternative, for annulment of Article 1(2) of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Fugro NV is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2019 –Briois v Parliament

(Case T-750/18) (1)

(Institutional law - Member of the European Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Decision to waive parliamentary immunity - Expiry of the electoral mandate - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 432/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Steeve Briois (Hénin-Beaumont, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alonso de Léon and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Decision P8_TA(2018)0401 of the Parliament of 24 October 2018 to waive the applicant’s parliamentary immunity.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present case.

2. The parties shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Trifolio-M and Others v EFSA

(Case T-675/18) (1)

(2019/C 413/78)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Order of the General Court of 14 May 2020 –Bernis and Others v SRB

(Case T-282/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and Monetary Union - Banking Union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Parent company and subsidiary - Declaration by the ECB that an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme - Lack of public interest - Winding up in accordance with national law - Shareholders - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 222/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ernests Bernis (Jurmala, Latvia), Oļegs Fiļs (Jurmala), OF Holding SIA (Riga, Latvia), Cassandra Holding Company SIA (Jurmala) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. De Carpentier, M. Meijer Timmerman Thijssen, A. Valavanidou, H. Ehlers and E. Muratori, acting as Agents, and by A. Rivas, lawyer, and B. Heenan, Solicitor)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: G. Marafioti, E. Koupepidou and J. Rodríguez Cárcamo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions of the SRB of 23 February 2018, by which it decided not to adopt resolution schemes in respect of ABLV Bank AS and its subsidiary, ABLV Bank Luxembourg SA, under Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Messrs Ernests Bernis and Oļegs Fiļs, OF Holding SIA and Cassandra Holding Company SIA shall bear their own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 January 2020 — Avio v Commission

(Case T-139/18) (1)

(2020/C 77/84)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — APG Intercon and Others v Council and Others

(Case T-147/18) (1)

(2021/C 252/55)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Order of the General Court of 1 December 2020 — Danske Slagtermestre v Commission

(Case T-486/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Contributions scheme for the collection of waste water - Preliminary examination stage - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Trade association - Locus standi - Status as an interested party - Objective of protecting the procedural rights guaranteed by Article 108(2) TFEU - Lack of individual concern - No substantial effect on the competitive position - Regulatory act - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 28/74)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Danske Slagtermestre (Odense, Denmark) (represented by: H. Sønderby Christensen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Nymann-Lindegren and M. Wolff, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 2259 final of 19 April 2018 relating to State aid SA.37433 (2017/FC) –Denmark, declaring, after the preliminary examination stage, that the contribution introduced by the lov nr. 902/2013 om ændring af lov om betalingsregler for spildevandsforsyningsselskaber m.v. (Betalingsstruktur for vandafledningsbidrag, bemyndigelse til opgørelse af særbidrag for behandling af særlig forurenet spildevand m.v.) (Law No 902/2013, amending the law establishing the rules relating to contributions owed to waste water treatment operators (structure of the contributions for the drainage of waste water, authorising special contributions for the treatment of particularly polluted waste water)) does not confer an advantage on specific undertakings and does not therefore constitute State Aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Danske Slagtermestre shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Kingdom of Denmark shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 381, 22.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Buffalo — Boots v Commission

(Case T-142/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/55)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Order of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Dragnea v Commission

(Case T-738/18 RENV) (1)

(External investigations conducted by OLAF - Refusal of access to the OLAF investigation file - Withdrawal and replacement of the contested measure - Action now devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 463/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Liviu Dragnea (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: C. Toby, O. Riffaud and B. Entringer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar, J. Baquero Cruz and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant is seeking, in essence, the annulment of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) letter of 1 October 2018 by which OLAF refused, first, to open an investigation into the manner in which it had conducted two investigations and, secondly, to grant him access to several documents.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Mr Liviu Dragnea and the European Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the proceedings at first instance and to the proceedings following the referral back to the General Court.

(1) OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.
Order of the General Court of 13 March 2019 — Comune di Milano v Parliament and Council

(Case T-75/19) (1)

(Declining of jurisdiction)

(2019/C 164/55)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Comune di Milano (represented by: F. Sciaudone, M. Condinanzi and A. Neri, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio, I. Anagnostopoulou and A. Tamás, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, F. Florindo Gijón and E. Rebasti, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, claim under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 as regards the location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (OJ 2018 L 291, p. 3), and, second, claim for a decision allegedly adopted by the Council on 20 November 2017 to be declared ineffective.

Operative part of the order

1. The General Court declines jurisdiction in Case T-75/19 in order to enable the Court of Justice to rule on the action.

2. The decision on the Comune di Milano’s request that the present action be determined under an expedited procedure is reserved.

3. The costs are reserved.

(1) OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
Order of the President of the General Court of 15 July 2019 — Camerin v Commission

(Case T-367/19 R)

(Interim measures - Civil Service - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2019/C 328/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Laure Camerin (Bastia, France) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, T. S. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking, first, suspension of the operation of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements of 17 April 2019 regarding the execution of the attachment order on the applicant’s pension and, second, the adoption of provisional measures to ensure that the amounts subject to attachment do not exceed the monthly sum corresponding to the basic salary of an official at the first step of grade AST 1.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 2 April 2019 — Lantmännen and Lantmännen Agroetanol v Commission

(Case T-79/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Settlement procedure - Access to documents - No urgency)

(2019/C 206/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Lantmännen ek för (Stockholm, Sweden), Lantmännen Agroetanol AB (Norrköping, Sweden) (represented by: S. Perván Lindeborg, A. Johansson, lawyers, and R. Bachour, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández, G. Conte and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of the decision of the European Commission C(2019) 743 final of 28 January 2019 on an objection to disclosure submitted by Lantmännen ek för and Lantmännen Agroetanol AB pursuant to Article 8 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the functioning and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (Case AT.40054 — Ethanol Benchmarks).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 14 February 2019, Lantmännen and Lantmännen Agroetanol v Commission (T-79/19 R), is cancelled.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 September 2019 — Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-566/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Extension of time limit - No interest)

(2019/C 413/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Scandlines Danmark ApS (Copenhagen, Denmark), Scandlines Deutschland GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Georgieva-Kecsmar and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the formal investigation procedure in State aid case SA.39078 (2019/C) (ex 2014/N) — Denmark — Financing of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link project (OJ 2019 C 226, p. 5).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.