ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 26 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘BOSOLAR’ EOOD v ‘CHEZ ELEKTRO BULGARIA’ AD, intervening party: ‘NATSIONALNA ELEKTRICHESKA KOMPANIA’ EAD

(Case C-366/19) (1)

(2022/C 64/39)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Fluctus s.r.o., Fluentum s.r.o., KI v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark

(Case C-920/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Gambling - Dual system of organisation of the market - Monopoly on lottery products and casino games - Prior authorisation for the use of automatic gaming machines - Advertising practices of the monopolist - Criteria for assessment - Constitutional case-law finding the national legislation to be compatible with EU law)

(2021/C 320/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Fluctus s.r.o., Fluentum s.r.o., KI

Respondent: Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark

Other party: Finanzpolizei Team 96

Operative part of the order

1. Article 56 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding a dual system of organisation of the market for games of chance on the sole ground that the advertising practices of the holder of the monopoly on lottery products and casino games aim at encouraging active participation in gambling, for example by trivialising gambling, by conferring on it a positive image because revenues derived from it are used for activities in the public interest or by increasing its attractiveness by means of enticing advertising messages holding out the tantalising prospect of major winnings.

2. The principle of primacy of EU law must be interpreted as requiring a national court of a Member State to disapply a provision of national law which is contrary to Article 56 TFEU, including where a higher court of that Member State has held that that provision was consistent with EU law.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 8 — Czech Republic) — mBank S.A. v PA

(Case C-98/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Jurisdiction in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which the consumer is domiciled - Article 18(2) - Proceedings brought against the consumer by the seller or supplier - Concept of ‘consumer’s domicile’ - Relevant time for determining the consumer’s domicile - Transfer of the consumer’s domicile after the conclusion of the contract and before the action is brought)

(2020/C 414/24)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Obvodní soud pro Prahu 8

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: mBank S.A.

Defendant: PA

Operative part of the order

The concept of ‘consumer’s domicile’ referred to in Article 18(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as designating the consumer’s domicile at the date on which the court action is brought.

(1) OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 22 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland — Netherlands) — P v Swiss International Air Lines AG

(Case C-512/20) (1)

(2021/C 138/39)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court of Justice has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 443, 21.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 9 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Badajoz — Spain) — Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas y Seguros de España (Adicae Consumidores Críticos y Responsables) v Caja Almendralejo Sociedad Cooperativa de Credito

(Case C-15/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/57)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège — Belgium) — VT v Centre public d'action sociale de Liège (CPAS)

(Case C-641/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2008/115/EC - Return of illegally staying third-country nationals - Return decision - Judicial remedy - Provisional right of residence and social assistance during the period in which the appeal is pending)

(2021/C 310/09)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VT

Defendant: Centre public d'action sociale de Liège (CPAS)

Operative part of the order

Articles 5 and 13 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, read in the light of Article 19(2) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as Article 14(1)(b) of that directive, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which does not confer automatic suspensory effect on an action brought by a third-country national against a return decision, within the meaning of Article 3(4) of that directive, concerning him, after the withdrawal by the competent authority of his refugee status pursuant to Article 11 of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, and, correlatively, does not confer on that third-country national a provisional right to reside and to have his basic needs taken care of until a decision on that action is taken, in the exceptional case where that national, who is affected by a serious illness, may, as a result of that decision being enforced, be exposed to a serious risk of grave and irreversible deterioration in his state of health. In this context, the national court, hearing a dispute the outcome of which is linked to the possible suspension of the effects of the return decision, must hold that the action brought against that decision has automatic suspensory effect, where that action contains arguments, that do not appear to be manifestly unfounded, seeking to establish that the enforcement of that decision would expose the third-country national to a serious risk of grave and irreversible deterioration in his state of health.

(1) OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék — Hungary) — FGSZ Földgázszállító Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-507/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 90 - Reduction of the taxable amount - Total or partial non-payment of the price - Debt which has become definitively irrecoverable - Limitation period regarding applications for a subsequent reduction in the taxable amount of VAT - Date on which time starts to run)

(2021/C 228/13)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Pécsi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: FGSZ Földgázszállító Zrt.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the order

Article 90 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, read in conjunction with the principles of fiscal neutrality and effectiveness, must be interpreted as meaning that, where a Member State lays down a limitation period after which a taxable person, who has a debt which has become definitively irrecoverable, can no longer assert his right to obtain a reduction in the taxable amount, that limitation period must begin to run not from the date of performance of the payment obligation initially provided for, but from the date on which the debt became definitively irrecoverable.

(1) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — PJ v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-527/20) (1)

(2021/C 368/17)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
Order of the President of the Court of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Nivelles — Belgium) — SD v Habitations sociales du Roman Païs SCRL, TE, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Régie des Quartiers de Tubize ASBL

(Case C-104/20) (1)

(2021/C 357/20)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 24 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 1 de Barcelona — Spain) — HV v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)

(Case C-258/20) (1)

(2021/C 513/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Tolnatext Bt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-636/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Union Customs Code - Article 22(6) - Article 29 - Right to be heard - Procedures initiated ex officio - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

(2021/C 382/07)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Pécsi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tolnatext Bt.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék (Pécs Court, Hungary), made by decision of 30 October 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-57/20) (1)

(2022/C 222/34)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale del Lazio — Italy) — Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio delle dogane di Gaeta v Punto Nautica Srl

(Case C-255/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Taxation - Harmonisation of legislation - Excise duty - Directive 92/12/EEC - Article 3(2) - Directive 2008/118/EC - Article 1(2) - Other indirect taxes on excise goods - Regional tax on the sale of fuel for motor vehicles - Specific purposes - Absence)

(2022/C 84/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Regionale del Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio delle dogane di Gaeta

Respondent: Punto Nautica Srl

Operative part of the order

Article 1(2) of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which introduces a regional tax on the sale of petrol for motor vehicles, given that, since the proceeds of that tax are intended solely as a general contribution to the budget of the local authorities, it cannot be regarded as pursuing a ‘specific purpose’ within the meaning of that provision.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie — Poland) — R1, R2 (C-650/20) v O1, O2 (C-650/20) and C (C-651/20) v T, O (C-651/20)

(Joined Cases C-650/20 and C-651/20) (1)

(Removal from the register)

(2023/C 24/20)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: R1, R2 (C-650/20), C (C-651/20)

Defendants: O1, O2 (C-650/20), T, O (C-651/20)

Operative part of the order

Joined Cases C-650/20 and C-651/20 are removed from the register of the Court.

(1) Date lodged: 30.11.20.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 31 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Avis Autovermietung Gesellschaft mbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation

(Case C-701/20) (1)

(2022/C 368/31)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v TZ

(Case C-10/21) (1)

(2021/C 368/27)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 88, 15.03.2021.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei conti — Sezione regionale di controllo per la Campania — Italy) — Comune di Camerota

(Case C-161/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Directive 2011/85/EU - Directive 2011/7/EU - Economic and monetary policy - Local authority in financial difficulty - Financial rebalancing plan - National legislation suspending the investigative powers of the Court of Auditors due to the health crisis related to the COVID-19 pandemic - Article 267 TFEU - Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ - No dispute before the referring body - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 51/17)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte dei conti — Sezione regionale di controllo per la Campania

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Comune di Camerota

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei conti — Sezione regionale di controllo per la Campania (Court of Auditors — Regional Audit Division for Campania, Italy), made by decision of 9 March 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.
Order of the President of the Court of 24 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Nokia Technologies Oy v Daimler AG, in the presence of: Continental Automotive GmbH and Others

(Case C-182/21) (1)

(2021/C 382/34)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 252, 28.6.2021.
Order of the President of the Court of 8 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt — Sweden) — Republiken Italien v Athena Investments A/S (formerly Greentech Energy Systems A/S) and Others

(Case C-155/21) (1)

(2022/C 198/40)

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék — Hungary) — WD v Agrárminiszter

(Case C-273/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Agriculture - Common Agricultural Policy - Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 - Direct support schemes - Article 4(1)(c) and (e) - Article 32(2) - Single area payment application - Concept of ‘eligible hectare’ - Land classified as an aerodrome according to the land register - Actual use for agricultural purposes)

(2022/C 95/07)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Budapest Környéki Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: WD

Defendant: Agrárminiszter

Operative part of the order

Article 4(1)(c) and (e) and Article 32(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 must be interpreted as meaning that an area classified, under national law, as an aerodrome, but on which no activity relating to an aerodrome is carried out, must be classified as an agricultural area used for agricultural purposes since it is in fact used as permanent pasture for livestock

(1) OJ C 252, 28.6.2021.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — WY v Steiermärkische Landesregierung

(Case C-85/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Citizenship of the Union - Articles 20 and 21 TFEU - Scope - Automatic loss of nationality of a Member State before the accession of that State to the European Union - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2022/C 266/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: WY

Respondent: Steiermärkische Landesregierung

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Regional Administrative Court, Styria, Austria) by decision of 3 February 2021.

(1) OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons — Belgium) — Ryanair DAC v Happy Flights Srl, formerly Happy Flights Sprl

(Case C-386/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/38)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2022 — Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-603/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Transport - Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 - Access to the international road haulage market - Cabotage - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - Condition that the measure must be of individual concern to the applicant - Professional association - Effective judicial protection - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

(2022/C 368/13)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Appellant: Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) (represented by: F. Vanden Bogaerde, advocaat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: I. Anagnostopoulou and R. van de Westelaken, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Emmerechts, A. Norberg and L. Vétillard, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

2. Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 513, 20.12.2021.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Efeteio Athinon — Greece) — VP, CX, RG, TR and Others v Elliniko Dimosio

(Case C-133/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social Policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Principle of non-discrimination - Successive fixed-term contracts in the public sector - National legislation establishing a difference in treatment as regards remuneration between workers employed under fixed-term contracts for the supply of services and those employed under contracts of indefinite duration - No justification - Concept of ‘objective reasons’)

(2022/C 359/17)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Efeteio Athinon

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: VP, CX, RG, TR and Others

Respondent: Elliniko Dimosio

Operative part of the order

Clause 4(1) of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which a fixed-term worker, whose contracts is classified as a contract for the supply of services, is not entitled to receive remuneration equivalent to that paid to a permanent worker on the ground that that worker carried out his or her work under a fixed-term contract in the knowledge that that contract sought to meet permanent and long-lasting needs of his or her employer.

(1) OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli — Italy) — VB v Comune di Portici

(Case C-777/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - Road traffic - Registration and taxation of motor vehicles - Vehicle registered in a Member State - Driver residing in the Member State where the vehicle is registered and in another Member State - Legislation of a Member State prohibiting persons who have resided in that Member State for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a vehicle registered in another country)

(2023/C 24/23)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Napoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: VB

Respondent: Comune di Portici

Operative part of the order

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which prohibits a self-employed worker who has resided in that Member State for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a vehicle registered in another Member State where the vehicle is neither intended to be used essentially in the first Member State on a permanent basis nor is, in fact, used in that manner.

(1) OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.