ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 September 2018 — Talanton AE — Simvouleftiki-Ekapideftiki Etaireia Dianomon, Parochis Ipiresion Marketing kai Dioikisis Epicheiriseon v European Commission

(Case C-539/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration 2007-2013 - Grant agreement - Non-eligible costs - European Commission decision on recovery - Action brought by the recipient before the General Court of the European Union on the basis of Article 272 TFEU - Appeal manifestly unfounded))

(2018/C 408/45)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellant: Talanton AE — Simvouleftiki-Ekapideftiki Etaireia Dianomon, Parochis Ipiresion Marketing kai Dioikisis Epicheiriseon (represented by: K. Damis, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Kyratsou and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2. Talanton AE — Simvouleftiki-Ekapideftiki Etaireia Dianomon, Parochis Ipiresion Marketing kai Dioikisis Epicheiriseon shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance de Limoges — France) — BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v Roger Ducloux, Marie Josée Ducloux

(Case C-618/17) (1)

(2018/C 341/17)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 10 July 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain, intervener: French Republic

(Case C-569/17) (1)

(2020/C 19/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 392, 20.11.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Roma — Italy) — Pina Cipollone v Ministero della Giustizia

(Case C-600/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Social policy - Fixed-term work - Magistrates - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2019/C 112/09)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pina Cipollone

Defendant: Ministero della Giustizia

Other party to the proceedings: Unione Nazionale Giudici di Pace (Unagipa)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Giudice di pace di Roma (Justice of the Peace, Rome, Italy) by decision of 25 August 2017 is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 437, 18.12.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/21

Order of the President of the Court of 1 March 2018 — Confédération européenne des associations d’horlogers-réparateurs (CEAHR) v European Commission, LVMH Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton SA, Rolex, SA, The Swatch Group SA

(Case C-3/18 P) (1)

(2018/C 190/39)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 21 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Pitești — Romania) — Maria-Cristina Dospinescu, Filofteia-Camelia Ganea, Petre Sinca, Luminița-Maria Ioniță, Maria Burduv, Raluca-Marinela Trașcă v Spitalul Județean de Urgență Vâlcea

(Case C-205/18) (1)

(2018/C 341/23)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 18.6.2018.
Case C-190/18: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the juge de paix du premier canton de Schaerbeek — Belgium) — Société nationale des chemins de fer belges (SNCB) v Gherasim Sorin Rusu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information as to the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the juge de paix du premier canton de Schaerbeek — Belgium) — Société nationale des chemins de fer belges (SNCB) v Gherasim Sorin Rusu

(Case C-190/18) ( 1 )

‛(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information as to the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)’

Referring court

Juge de paix du premier canton de Schaerbeek

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Société nationale des chemins de fer belges (SNCB)

Defendant: Gherasim Sorin Rusu

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the juge de paix du premier canton de Schaerbeek (Belgium), by decision of 20 February 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

( 1 ) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Linz — Austria) — DS v Porsche Inter Auto GmbH & Co KG

(Case C-466/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/31)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki upravni sud — Croatia) — Hrvatska banka za obnovu i razvitak (HBOR) v Povjerenik za informiranje Republike Hrvatske

(Case C-90/18) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2018/C 399/21)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Visoki upravni sud

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hrvatska banka za obnovu i razvitak (HBOR)

Defendant: Povjerenik za informiranje Republike Hrvatske

Intervener: Hrvoje Šimić

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki upravni sud (Administrative Court of Appeal, Croatia), by decision of 1 February 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 134, 16.4.2018
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 8 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — A, B v C

(Case C-750/18) (1)

(2019/C 172/38)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 17 December 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-487/18) (1)

(2019/C 103/25)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 328, 17.9.2018.
Order of the President of the Court of 3 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Mijo Meštrović v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Murtal, in the presence of: Finanzpolizei

(Case C-50/18) (1)

(2019/C 280/44)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 February 2019 — European Commission v Slovak Republic

(Case C-614/18) (1)

(2019/C 172/35)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.
3.

Article 15 of Regulation No 2201/2003 must be interpreted to the effect that the existence of differences between the rules of law, in particular the rules of procedure, of a Member State having jurisdiction as to the substance of a case and those of another Member State with which the child concerned has a particular connection, such as the examination of cases in camera by specialist judges, does not constitute, in a general and abstract way, a relevant criterion, in light of the best interests of the child, when assessing whether the courts of that Member State are better placed to hear that case. The court having jurisdiction may take those differences into consideration only if they are such as to provide genuine and specific added value with respect to the decision to be taken in relation to that child, as compared with the possibility of the case remaining before that court.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 12 April 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, supported by: Kingdom of Belgium, French Republic

(Case C-188/18) (1)

(2019/C 288/47)

Language of the case: Slovenian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di L’Aquila (Italy) — Gabriele Di Girolamo v Ministero della Giustizia

(Case C-618/18) (1)

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Fixed-term employment - ETUC-UNICE-CEEP - Definition of a ‘fixed-term worker’ - Giudice di Pace - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 68/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di L’Aquila

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gabriele Di Girolamo

Defendant: Ministero della Giustizia

intervening party: Unione Nazionale Giudici di Pace (Unagipa)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di L’Aquila (Magistrates Court, L’Aquila, Italy), made by decision of 19 September 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 14 August 2019 — Nestlé Unternehmungen Deutschland GmbH v Lotte Co. Ltd, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIP)

(C-580/18 P) (1)

(2020/C 19/41)

Language of the case: German.

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — H. Solak v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv)

(Case C-258/18) (1)

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Article 59 of the Additional Protocol - Decision No 3/80 - Social security for Turkish migrant workers - Waiver of residence clauses - Article 6 - Supplementary benefits - Suspension - Renunciation of the nationality of the host Member State - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Special non-contributory cash benefits - Residence requirement)

(2020/C 137/33)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: H. Solak

Defendant: Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv)

Operative part of the order

Article 6(1), first paragraph, of Decision No 3/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the application of the social security schemes of the Member States of the European Communities to Turkish workers and members of their families, read together with Article 59 of the Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 at Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the European Economic Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 of 19 December 1972, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation pursuant to which the payment of a benefit intended to supplement an invalidity pension in order to ensure a minimum income, granted in accordance with that legislation, is suspended with regard to a Turkish national, duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State who, after renouncing the citizenship of a Member State which he had acquired during his residence in that State, has returned to his country of origin.

(1) OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 December 2019 — Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH v European Commission

(Case C-568/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Article 4(2), first indent - Exceptions to the right of access - Protection of commercial interests of a natural or legal person - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Article 6(1) - Application of the exceptions concerning requests for access to environmental information - Documents drawn up by the European Commission under the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Refusal of access - Subsequent transmission of the documents requested - Article 149 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - No further interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 68/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and D. Jacob, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs incurred in the present appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central — Spain) — Ente Público Radio Televisión Madrid (C-694/18), Agencia Pública Empresarial de la Radio y Televisión de Andalucía (RTVA) (C-695/18), Radiotelevisión del Principado de Asturias S.A.U. (C-696/18), Ente Público de Radiotelevisión de Castilla La Mancha (C-697/18) v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (AEAT)

(Joined Cases C-694/18 to C-697/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/29)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain, supported by: French Republic

(Case C-164/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/18)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2019 — (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against QR

(Case C-467/19 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive (EU) 2016/343 - Article 7(4) - Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings - Right to remain silent and right not to incriminate oneself - Agreement between the prosecutor and the offender - Approval of such an agreement by the court - Condition - Consent of the other accused persons - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Not applicable)

(2019/C 423/25)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Criminal proceedings against

QR

interveners: Spetsializirana prokuratura, YM, ZK, HD

Operative part of the order

Article 7(4) of Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that it does not govern the issue of whether or not the approval, by a court, of an agreement on the imposition of a negotiated sentence, such as the agreement at issue in the main proceedings, concluded between a person accused, on the basis of his alleged membership of a criminal group, and the prosecutor, may be rendered subject to the condition that the other persons accused, on the basis of their membership of that criminal group, must give their consent to the conclusion of that agreement.

(1) OJ C 280, 19.8.2019.
1.

The concept of ‘school and university education’ for the purpose of Article 132(1)(i) and (j) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as not including surfing and sailing tuition provided by surf and sailing schools, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, for schools or universities in which that tuition may, respectively, form part of the sporting activities programme or the training for physical education teachers and count towards the grade given to such pupils or students.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 26 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Zadru — Croatia) — R. D., A. D. v Raiffeisenbank St. Stefan-Jagerberg-Wolfsberg eGen

(Case C-277/19) (1)

(2020/C 68/48)

Language of the case: Croatian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.
1.

Articles 8 and 9 of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as meaning that the classification of a commercial practice as aggressive, within the meaning of those provisions, requires a concrete and specific assessment, in the light of the criteria set out in those provisions, of all the circumstances characterising that practice. Where a contract has been concluded by an elderly person suffering from a serious disability and having a limited income which does not enable that person to repay the debts that he or she has accumulated, the fact that the contract thus concluded had the effect of enabling a national consumer protection provision to be circumvented is an indication that the trader concerned intended to knowingly take advantage of the particular gravity of the situation of that person, in order to influence his or her decision, this being a matter for the referring court to assess.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Industria Italiana Autobus SpA v Comune di Palermo, interested party: Irisbus Italia SpA

(Case C-111/19) (1)

(2020/C 137/65)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Rieco SpA v Comune di Lanciano, Ecolan SpA (C-89/19), Comune di Ortona, Ecolan SpA (C-90/19), Comune di San Vito Chietino, Ecolan SpA (C-91/19)

(Joined Cases C-89/19 to C-91/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure - Public procurement - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 12(3) - National legislation favouring public procurement procedures to the detriment of in-house contracts - Freedom of the Member States as to the choice of how services are to be provided - Limits - National legislation excluding the possibility for a contracting authority to acquire, in a body owned by contracting authorities, a shareholding which cannot guarantee control of that body or a power of veto)

(2020/C 313/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rieco SpA

Defendants: Comune di Lanciano, Ecolan SpA (C-89/19), Comune di Ortona, Ecolan SpA (C-90/19), Comune di San Vito Chietino, Ecolan SpA (C-91/19)

Interveners: Comune di Ortona (C-89/19), Comune di Treglio (C-89/19), Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC).

Operative part of the order

1. Article 12(3) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC must be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law which makes the conclusion of an in-house transaction, also referred to as an ‘in-house contract’, conditional on it not being possible to use a public procurement procedure and, in any event, on the demonstration by the contracting authority of the benefits specifically arising, for society at large, from recourse to an in-house transaction.

2. Article 12(3) of Directive 2014/24 must be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law which prevents a contracting authority from acquiring a shareholding in an entity whose shareholders are other contracting authorities where that shareholding cannot guarantee control or a power of veto and where that contracting authority intends to later acquire joint control and, consequently, the possibility of directly awarding contracts to that entity whose share capital is owned by a number of contracting authorities.

(1) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 July 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën, Openbaar Ministerie v Metalen Galler NV (C–632/19 and C–633/19), LW–Idee GmbH (C–632/19 and C–633/19), KGH Belgium NV (C–632/19), Vollers Belgium NV (C–633/19)

(Joined Cases C-632/19 and C-633/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Dumping - Importation of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China - Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 - Validity and interpretation - Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual background of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 304/03)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën, Openbaar Ministerie

Defendants: Metalen Galler NV (C–632/19 and C–633/19), LW–Idee GmbH (C–632/19 and C–633/19), KGH Belgium NV (C–632/19), Vollers Belgium NV (C–633/19)

Operative part of the order

The references for a preliminary ruling made by the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (District Court of Antwerp, Belgium) by decisions of 27 March 2019 are manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 23 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — VZ v Eurowings GmbH

(Case C-880/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/51)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.