ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 14/33

Order of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Vitra Collections v EUIPO — Consorzio Origini (Shape of a chair)

(Case T-455/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 014/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Vitra Collections AG (Muttenz, Switzerland) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented: initially by P. Bullock, subsequently by D. Hanf and finally by D. Hanf and S. Bonne, acting as agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Consorzio Origini per l’Internazionalizzazione (Florence, Italy) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2015 (Case R 664/2011-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Consorzio Origini and Vitra Collections AG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Vitra Collections AG and Consorzio Origini per l’Internazionalizzazione shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 5/42

Order of the General Court of 26 October 2017 — Federcaccia della Regione Liguria and Others v Commission

(Case T-570/15) (1)

((Environment - Conservation of wild birds - Species which may be hunted - Conditions to be complied with by national laws on hunting - Harmonisation of the criteria for the application of Article 7(4) of Directive 2009/147/EC - Closed period of hunting in Liguria))

(2018/C 005/57)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Federcaccia della Regione Liguria (Genoa, Italy) and the ten other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: A. Bruni, P. Balletti and A. Mozzati, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and C. Hermes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to update certain Italian data in the document on key concepts, established by the ORNIS Committee, which is provided for by Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 2010 L 20, p. 7); application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s letter of 6 October 2014 stating that the extension in Italy of the hunting season for certain species of bird is incompatible with EU law; and application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the Commission’s failure to update the Italian data.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Federcaccia della Regione Liguria and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 277/60

Order of the General Court of 29 June 2017 — It Works v EUIPO — KESA Holdings Luxembourg (IT it WORKS)

(Case T-778/15) (1)

(2017/C 277/86)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 90, 7.3.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Flabeg Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-103/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Flabeg Deutschland GmbH (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented initially by: M. Küper and E.–M. Schwind, and subsequently by: J. Stein and A. Kersten, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, and subsequently by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents, and by H. Wollmann, lawyer)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Flabeg Deutschland GmbH.

(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — BBY Solutions v EUIPO — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY)

(Case T-773/15) (1)

(2018/C 381/37)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 14/55

Order of the General Court of 13 October 2016 — Axium v Parliament

(Case T-392/16) (1)

(2017/C 014/66)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/37

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2016 — NI v CEPD

(Case T-237/16) (1)

(2016/C 410/67)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 86/33

Order of the General Court of 2 February 2017 — Adama Agriculture and Adama France v Commission

(Case T-476/16) (1)

(2017/C 086/43)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/33

Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 16 December 2016 — Casasnovas Bernad v Commission

(Case T-826/16 R)

((Application for interim measures - Civil service - Contract staff - Termination of a contract of indefinite duration - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency))

(2017/C 038/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Luis Javier Casasnovas Bernad (Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU and seeking suspension of operation of the Commission’s decision of 27 September 2016 terminating the applicant’s contract.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/43

Order of the General Court of 14 March 2017 — Karl Conzelmann v EUIPO (LIKE IT)

(Case T-21/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for registration of the word mark LIKE IT - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 144/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Karl Conzelmann GmbH + Co. KG (Albstadt, Germany) (represented by: J. Klink, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Graul and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 November 2015 (Case R 223/2015-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign LIKE IT as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Karl Conzelmann GmbH + Co. KG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/36

Order of the General Court of 10 February 2017 — Acerga v Council

(Case T-153/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Fisheries - Conservation of fisheries resources - Fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters - Association - No individual concern - Act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 112/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Asociación de armadores de cerco de Galicia (Acerga) (Sada, Spain) (represented by: B. Huarte Melgar, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Westerhof Löfflerová and F. Florindo Gijón, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment in part of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/72 of 22 January 2016 fixing for 2016 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2015/104 (OJ 2016 L 22, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.

3. Asociación de armadores de cerco de Galicia (Acerga) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 200, 6.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/21

Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Palos Caravina v CdT

(Case T-725/16) (1)

((Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Officials - Recruitment - Communication of information concerning the appointment of a third party - Third paragraph of Article 25 of the Staff Regulations - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Maria José Palos Caravina (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Salerno and P. Singer, lawyers)

Defendant: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: M. Garnier and J. Rikkert, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of, first, the CdT’s decision of 23 December 2015 refusing to provide the applicant with information concerning the appointment of a third party and, second, the CdT’s decision of 5 July 2016 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant against that refusal.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Maria José Palos Caravina.

(1) OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/46

Order of the General Court of 3 March 2017 — GX v Commission

(Case T-556/16) (1)

((Civil service - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open Competition EPSO/AD/248/13 - Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 144/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GX (represented by: G.-M. Enache, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the selection board in Open Competition EPSO/AD/248/13 of 20 August 2014 not to include the applicant on the reserve list and, secondly, compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicant on account of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. GX shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-89/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 231/24

Order of the General Court of 15 May 2017 — Dominator International v EUIPO (DREAMLINE)

(Case T-285/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark DREAMLINE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Not distinctive - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law - Article 126 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2017/C 231/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dominator International GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: N. Gugerbauer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 March 2016 (Case R 1669/2015-2) concerning the international registration designating the European Union of word mark DREAMLINE.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Dominator International GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/18

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2017 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-75/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - EIB staff - Appraisal - Career evaluation report - Appraisal year 2010 - Errors of law - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2017/C 202/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented initially by: G. Nuvoli and T. Gilliams, and subsequently by: G. Nuvoli and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015, De Nicola v EIB (F-128/11, EU:F:2015:168), seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal.

(1) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/20

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2017 — L'Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot (MASTER DRAMA)

(Case T-183/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MASTER DRAMA - Prior national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly unfounded in law - Article 126 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2017/C 269/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: L'Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Guinot (Paris) (represented by: A. Sion, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 (Case R 2500/2014-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Guinot and L’Oréal.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. L’Oréal shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 256/41

Order of the General Court of 13 June 2017 — Sandvik Intellectual Property v EUIPO — Adveo Group International (ADVEON)

(Case T-115/16) (1)

(2017/C 256/48)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 338/15

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 August 2017 — Malta v Commission

(Case T-653/16 R)

((Interim measures - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Common fisheries policy - Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 - Documents exchanged by Malta and the Commission - Access granted to Greenpeace - Application for suspension of operation - Prima facie case - Balancing of interests))

(2017/C 338/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Malta (represented by: A. Buhagiar, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of the decision of the Commission of 13 July 2016, adopted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, relating to a request for access to documents registered under the reference GestDem2015/5711A-018-2014.

Operative part of the order

1. Operation of the decision of the European Commission of 13 July 2016, adopted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, relating to a request for access to documents registered under the reference GestDem2015/5711, is suspended in so far as that decision grants access to documents originating from the Republic of Malta.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/49

Order of the General Court of 5 July 2017 — EEB v Commission

(Case T-38/16) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents concerning the withdrawal of Proposal COM(2014) 397 final for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council - Partial refusal of access - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 283/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Kloostra, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet, F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and E. Sanfrutos Cano, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2015) 5212500 of 19 November 2015.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB).

(1) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 5/43

Order of the General Court of 23 October 2017 — Karp v Parliament

(Case T-833/16) (1)

((Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Classification - Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Premature complaint - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 005/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Kevin Karp (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by N. Lambers and R. Ben Ammar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by Í. Ní Riagáin Düro and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking, first, annulment of the Parliament’s decisions classifying the applicant in function group I, grade 1, under the contract as an accredited parliamentary assistant concluded on 25 February 2015, and in function group II, grade 4, step 1, under the contract of employment as contract agent concluded on 12 May 2016 and, secondly, seeking compensation for the damages allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of those classifications.

Operative part of the order

1. The request for an expedited procedure is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

3. Mr Kevin Karp is ordered to pay the costs

(1) OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 392/31

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinWärme)

(Case T-719/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark berlinWärme - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly unfounded in law))

(2017/C 392/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Manea and D. Hanf, agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 July 2016 (Case R 618/2016-1), relating to the application for registration of the word sign berlinWärme as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 411, 28.11.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 104/54

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2018 — QE v Eurojust

(Case T-850/16) (1)

(2018/C 104/71)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 52/29

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — PGNiG Supply & Trading v Commission

(Case T-849/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2009/73/EC - Commission decision amending the conditions for exemption from the EU requirements of the rules governing operation of the OPAL pipeline in regard to third-party access and tariff regulation - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 052/41)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Jeżewski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on the review of the conditions for exemption of the OPAL pipeline, granted under Directive 2003/55/EC, from the rules on third-party access and tariff regulation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene.

3. PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

4. The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

5. PGNiG Supply & Trading, the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, Naftogaz Ukrainy SA, OPAL Gastransport GmbH & Co. KG and Gazprom Eksport LLC shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.
Case T-787/16: Order of the General Court of 31 May 2018 — QD v EUIPO

Order of the General Court of 31 May 2018 — QD v EUIPO

(Case T-787/16) ( 1 )

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 166/30

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2018 — KiK Textilien und Non-Food v EUIPO — FF Group Romania (_kix)

(Case T-822/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark _kix - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate - Articles 173(1) and (2) of the Rules of Procedure - Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Response lodged out of time))

(2018/C 166/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KiK Textilien und Non-Food GmbH (Bönen, Germany) (represented by: S. Körber and L. Pechan, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Zajfert and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: FF Group Romania SRL (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: A. Cavescu, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2016 (Case R 2323/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between KiK Textilien und Non-Food and FF Group Romania.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by KiK Textilien und Non-Food GmbH.

3. FF Group Romania shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.