ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/20

Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gliwicach — Poland) — proceedings brought by: Adarco Invest sp. z o.o. w Petrosani w Rumunii Oddział w Polsce w Tarnowskich Górach

(Case C-629/13) (1)

2014/C 261/38

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.
3.

It is for the referring court to determine whether the employer’s obligation to provide the national authority responsible for monitoring working conditions access to the record of working time so as to allow its immediate consultation may be considered necessary for the purposes of the performance by that authority of its monitoring task, by contributing to the more effective application of the legislation relating to working conditions, in particular as regards working time, and, if so, whether the penalties imposed with a view to ensuring the effective application of the requirements laid down by Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003, concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, are consistent with the principle of proportionality.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/28

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture — Italy) — Emmeci Srl v Cotral SpA

(Case C-427/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 315/44

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Emmeci Srl

Defendant: Cotral SpA

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture (Italy), by its decision of 22 May 2013 (Case C-427/13).

(1) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/46

Order of the President of the Court of 4 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Gigaset AG v SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH, SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG

(Case C-451/13) (1)

2014/C 315/78

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Order of the Court of 22 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Elcogás SA v Administración del Estado, Iberdrola SA

(Case C-275/13) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Concept of State intervention or through State resources - Companies which own electricity generating plants - Extraordinary financing)

(2015/C 016/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elcogás SA

Defendant: Administracion del Estado, Iberdrola SA

Operative part of the order

Article 107(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the sums allocated to a private undertaking producing electricity which are financed by all end users of electricity in the national territory and which are distributed to undertakings in the electricity sector by a public body in accordance with predetermined legal criteria constitute aid granted by a Member State or through State resources.

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/21

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Deza a.s., Industrial Química del Nalón SA, Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

(Case C-288/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) - Article 59 and Annex XIII - Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure - Equal treatment))

2014/C 409/29

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Deza a.s., Industrial Química del Nalón SA, Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents, and by J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, advocaten)

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Deza a.s., Industrial Química del Nalón SA and Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/9

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 February 2015 — Iliad SA, Free infrastructure, Free SAS v European Commission, French Republic, Republic of Poland, Département des Hauts-de-Seine

(Case C-624/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - compensation for the costs of providing a public service for the establishment and operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network))

(2015/C 146/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Iliad SA, Free infrastructure SAS, Free SAS (represented by: T. Cabot, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents), French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and J. Bousin, Agents), Republic of Poland, Département des Hauts-de-Seine (represented by: G. O’Mahony, avocat)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Iliad SA, Free Intrastructure SAS and Free SAS are ordered to pay the costs of the European Commission, the French Republic and the Département des Hauts-de-Seine.

(1) OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 127/3

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Mirko Saba

(Case C-652/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Identical questions referred - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Games of chance - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences with a shorter period than that of licences awarded in the past - Restriction - Overriding reasons of general interest - Proportionality))

(2015/C 127/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari

Criminal proceedings against

Mirko Saba

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that in issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders relating to licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past due to a reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates.

(1) OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 November 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapesti XX., XXI. és XXIII. kerületi bíróság — Hungary) — Herrenknecht AG v Hév-Sugár kft

(Case C-366/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Manifest inadmissibility - Absence of sufficient information concerning the factual background and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling)

(2015/C 016/22)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Budapesti XX., XXI. és XXIII. kerületi bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Herrenknecht AG

Defendant: Hév-Sugár kft

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Budapesti XX., XXI. és XXIII. kerületi bíróság (Hungary), by decision of 11 July 2014 (Case C-366/14), is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/21

Order of the President of the Court of 6 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Jürgen Kaiser v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-46/14) (1)

2014/C 261/42

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/17

Order of the President of the Court of 16 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Annette Lorch, Kurt Lorch v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-364/14) (1)

(2014/C 431/29)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 339, 29.9.2014.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 17 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 58 de Madrid — Spain) — Juan Pedro Ludeña Hormigos v Banco de Santander SA

(Case C-188/14) (1)

(2015/C 016/36)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/11

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Satu Mare — Romania) — Sergiu Lucian Băbăşan v Inspectoratul Judtean de Politie Satu Mare

(Case C-305/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - National legislation according to which prior authorisation is required for the organisation of a public meeting - Failure to implement EU law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice))

(2015/C 146/17)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Satu Mare

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sergiu Lucian Băbăşan

Defendant: Inspectoratul Judtean de Politie Satu Mare

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Tribunalul Satu Mare (Romania) by its decision of 7 March 2014.

(1) OJ C 329, 22.9.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 127/5

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Roberto Siddu

(Case C-478/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Identical questions - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Games of chance - National rules - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past - Restriction - Compelling reasons of general interest - Proportionality))

(2015/C 127/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy

Criminal proceedings against

Roberto Siddu

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders concerning licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past on account of a reorganisation of the system through the alignment of licence expiry dates.

(1) OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/6

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 June 2015 — The Sunrider Corporation v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Nannerl GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-142/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of word mark SUN FRESH - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier Community word mark SUNNY FRESH - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods covered by the marks at issue - Right to be heard - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 8(1)(b), 75 and 76))

(2015/C 320/08)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: The Sunrider Corporation (represented by: N. Dontas and E. Markakis, dikigoroi)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent), Nannerl GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: A. Thünken, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The Sunrider Corporation shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/22

Order of the President of the Court of 27 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Stephan Naumann v Austrian Airlines AG

(Case C-612/14) (1)

(2015/C 213/41)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/14

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 May 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Elena Delia Pondiche v Statul român, Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării

(Case C-608/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Grant of dependent child allowances - Determining the applicable law according to the date of birth of the child and not according to the date of conception - No implementation of EU law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2015/C 320/19)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elena Delia Pondiche

Defendant: Statul român, Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Tribunalul Sibiu (Romania), by decision of 20 November 2014.

(1) OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/26

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 17 July 2015 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Unibail Management

(Joined Cases C-512/14 P and C-513/14 P) (1)

(2015/C 320/39)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/22

Order of the President of the Court of 28 January 2016 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-60/14) (1)

(2016/C 136/27)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 93, 29.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 398/23

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 16 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Fadil Cocaj v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal

(Case C-459/14) (1)

(2015/C 398/31)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/2

Order of the Court of 21 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Cartagena, Spain) — Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS, Oslo, branch in Zurich, formerly Aktiv Kapital Portfolio Investment v Angel Luis Egea Torregrosa

(Case C-122/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Order for payment procedure - Enforcement proceedings))

(2016/C 326/02)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Cartagena, Spain

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS, Oslo, branch in Zurich, formerly Aktiv Kapital Portfolio Investment

Defendant: Angel Luis Egea Torregrosa

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which do not allow the court dealing with the enforcement of a payment order to determine of its own motion, even though it has all the elements of law and fact necessary for that purpose, the unfairness of a term in a contract concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer which gave rise to that order, where, in the absence of opposition to the order by the consumer, the court

(1) OJ C 159 of 26.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 270/5

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Mauro Barletta

(Case C-435/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Identical questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Betting and gaming - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences for a shorter term than that of the former licences - Transfer, free of charge, of the rights to use tangible and intangible assets owned constituting the network for the management and collection of bets - Restriction - Overriding reasons in the public interest - Proportionality))

(2016/C 270/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Bari

Criminal proceedings against

Mauro Barletta

Operative part of the order

1. Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation on betting and gaming, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders for the award of licences with a shorter period of validity than that of the licences awarded in the past on account of the reorganisation of the system through the alignment of licence expiry dates.

2. Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a restrictive national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires a licensee of a betting and gambling service to transfer, free of charge, on the cessation of business as a result of the expiry of the final term of the licence, the rights to use tangible and intangible assets which he owns and which constitute his network for the management and collection of bets, in so far as that restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the objective actually pursued by that provision, which is for the referring court to verify.

(1) OJ C 448, 15.12.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 398/25

Order of the President of the Court of 14 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — Korpschef van politie v W.F. de Munk

(Case C-209/15) (1)

(2015/C 398/35)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/23

Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2016 — European Commission v Romania

(Case C-306/15) (1)

(2016/C 136/30)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/11

Order of the President of the Court of 30 November 2015 — European Commission v Romania

(Case C-366/15) (1)

(2016/C 078/17)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 346, 19.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 270/11

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Vito Santoro

(Case C-65/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Identical questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Betting and gaming - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences for a shorter term than that of the former licences - Transfer, free of charge, of the rights to use tangible and intangible assets owned constituting the network for the management and collection of bets - Restriction - Overriding reasons in the public interest - Proportionality))

(2016/C 270/14)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Bari

Criminal proceedings against

Vito Santoro

Operative part of the order

1. Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation on betting and gaming, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders for the award of licences with a shorter period of validity than that of the licences awarded in the past on account of the reorganisation of the system through the alignment of licence expiry dates.

2. Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a restrictive national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires a licensee of a betting and gambling service to transfer, free of charge, on the cessation of business as a result of the expiry of the final term of the licence, the rights to use tangible and intangible assets which he owns and which constitute his network for the management and collection of bets, in so far as that restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the objective actually pursued by that provision, which is for the referring court to verify.

(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/2

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — SolarWorld AG v Brandoni solare SpA, Global Sun Ltd, Silicio Solar SAU, Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente SA, European Commission

(Case C-142/15 P) (1)

((Appeals - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 263 TFEU - Criterion for direct concern - Appeal manifestly unfounded - Dumping - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from China - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 8 - Offer of a price undertaking by Chinese exporting producers - Acceptance by the Commission - Exemption of anti-dumping duties - Action against the acceptance decision - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 200/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: SolarWorld AG (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Brandoni solare SpA, Global Sun Ltd, Silicio Solar SAU, Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente SA (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, and J. Beck, Solicitor), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, T. Maxian Rusche and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. SolarWorld AG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.