ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 232/19

Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2016 — Market Watch v EUIPO — Glaxo Group (MITOCHRON)

(Case T-312/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MITOCHRON - Earlier national word mark MIVACRON - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 232/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. (Freeport, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Glaxo Group Ltd (Brentford, United Kingdom) (represented by S. Malynicz, Barrister, and A. Smith, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 March 2015 (Case R 507/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Glaxo Group Ltd and Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/25

Judgment of the General Court of 20 July 2016 — Internet Consulting v EUIPO Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige (SUEDTIROL)

(Case T-11/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity - EU word mark SUEDTIROL - Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Absolute ground for refusal - Geographical indication of origin - Descriptive character))

(2016/C 326/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Internet Consulting GmbH (Brunico, Italy) (represented by: L. Miori and A. Bertella, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige (Italy) (represented by: C. Volkmann, lawyer) (Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 October 2014 (Case R 574/2013-G), relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between the Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige and Internet Consulting.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Internet Consulting GmbH to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 305/31

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2016 — Mozzetti v EUIPO — di Lelio (ALFREDO’S GALLERY alla Scrofa Roma)

(Case T-97/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity - Figurative EU trade mark ALFREDO’S GALLERY alla Scrofa Roma - Earlier national word mark L’ORIGINALE ALFREDO - Request for proof of genuine use - Article 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 305/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Mario Mozzetti (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ines di Lelio (Rome) (represented by: D. De Simone, G. Orsoni and R. Fecchio, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2014 (Case R 656/2014-1), relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between Ms di Lelio and Mr Mozzetti.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Mario Mozzetti to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 402/44

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — JT International v EUIPO — Habanos (PUSH)

(Case T-633/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark PUSH - Earlier Benelux and national word and figurative marks PUNCH - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Identity of the goods - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 402/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JT International SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and K.E. Gilbert and J. Gilbert, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Corporación Habanos, SA (Havana, Cuba) (represented by: M. Escudero Pérez, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 August 2015 (Case R 3046/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Corporación Habanos and JT International

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders JT International SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Corporación Habanos, SA.

(1) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 392/39

Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Lotte v EUIPO — Kuchenmeister (KOALA LAND)

(Case T-479/15) (1)

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark KOALA LAND - Prior national word mark KOALA - Rejection in part of the application for registration - Likelihood of confusion - Genuine use - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 392/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Lotte Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: M. Knitter and S. Schicker, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Kuchenmeister GmbH (Soest, Germany) (represented by: P. Blumenthal, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 June 2015 (Case R 815/2014-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Kuchenmeister and Lotte.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Lotte Co. Ltd to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 337, 12.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 419/38

Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2016 — Intesa Sanpaolo v EUIPO (WAVE 2 PAY and WAVE TO PAY)

(Case T-129/15 and T-130/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word marks WAVE 2 PAY and WAVE TO PAY - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 419/48)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Cecchi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: initially P. Bullock and L. Rampini, then L. Rampini, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against two decisions of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 January 2015 (Cases, respectively, R 1857/2014-5 and R 1864/2014-5), concerning two applications for registration of the word signs, respectively, WAVE 2 PAY and WAVE TO PAY as EU trade marks.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the actions;

2. Orders Intesa Sanpaolo SpA to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 155, 2.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/16

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2016 — Satkirit Holdings v EUIPO — Advanced Mailing Solutions (luvo)

(Case T-449/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark luvo - Earlier EU work mark luvo - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 410/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Satkirit Holdings Ltd (Douglas, Isle of Man) (represented by: M. Vanhegan, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Sliwinska and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Advanced Mailing Solutions Ltd (East Kilbride, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 May 2015 (Case R 877/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Advanced Mailing Solutions and Satkirit Holdings

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Satkirit Holdings Ltd to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 462/17

Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2016 — Hamcho and Hamcho International v Council

(Case T-153/15) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds - Annulment of the earlier measures by a judgment of the General Court - New measures including the names of the applicants on the lists - Action for annulment - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Content of the application - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Burden of proof - Right to property - Freedom to conduct business))

(2016/C 462/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Mohamed Hamcho (Damascus, Syria) and Hamcho International (Damascus) (represented by: A. Boesch, D. Amaudruz and M. Ponsard, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as agents)

Re:

Action brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/117/CFSP of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 85) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 2), in that the names of the applicants have been included on the list of persons and bodies subject to restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Mr Mohamed Hamcho and Hamcho International to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union in the proceedings at first instance and in the proceedings for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 428/16

Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2016 — Guccio Gucci v EUIPO — Guess? IP Holder (Representation of four interlocking Gs)

(Case T-753/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Application for an EU figurative mark representing four interlocking Gs - Earlier EU and international figurative marks G - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 428/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Guccio Gucci SpA (Florence, Italy) (represented by: P.L. Roncaglia, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Guess? IP Holder LP (Los Angeles, California, United States) (represented by: D. McFarland, Barrister)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 October 2015 (Case R 1703/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Guccio Gucci and Guess? IP Holder.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Guccio Gucci SpA to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by Guess? IP Holder LP before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/31

Judgment of the General Court of 1 December 2016 — EK/servicegroup v EUIPO (FERLI)

(Case T-775/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark FERLI - Requirement of clarity - Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rights of the defence - Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 022/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: EK/servicegroup eG (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: T. Müller and T. A. Müller, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 October 2015 (Case R 1233/2015-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign FERLI as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders EK/servicegroup eG to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 78, 28.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/36

Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2016 — For Tune v EUIPO — Gastwerk Hotel Hamburg (fortune)

(Case T-579/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark fortune - Earlier German word mark FORTUNE-HOTELS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 006/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: For Tune sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: K. Popławska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gastwerk Hotel Hamburg GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 August 2015 (Case R 2808/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Gastwerk Hotel Hamburg and For Tune.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders For Tune sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/33

Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Gallardo Blanco v EUIPO — Expasa Agricultura y Ganadería (Representation of a branding iron (shape of an H-shaped horse bit))

(Case T-716/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark consisting of the representation of a branding iron (shape of an H-shaped horse bit) - Earlier EU and Spanish figurative marks - Relative grounds for refusal - Genuine use of the earlier marks - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 038/45)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Juan Gallardo Blanco (Los Barrios, Spain) (represented by: E. Estella Garbayo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Expasa Agricultura y Ganadería, SA (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain) (represented by: A. Bosch Döffert, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2015 (Case R 1502/2014-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Expasa Agricultura y Ganadería and Mr Juan Gallardo Blanco.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Juan Gallardo Blanco to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 30/45

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2016 — Guiral Broto v EUIPO — Gastro & Soul (Café del Sol)

(Case T-548/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Café del Sol - Earlier national figurative mark Café del Sol - Failure to submit evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings - Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rules 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Rights of the defence))

(2017/C 030/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ramón Guiral Broto (Marbella, Spain) (represented by: J.L. de Castro Hermida, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gastro & Soul GmbH (Hildesheim, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 July 2015 (Case R 2755/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Guiral Broto and Gastro & Soul.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 July 2015 (Case R 2755/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Ramón Guiral Broto and Gastro & Soul GmbH;

2. Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3. Orders EUIPO and Mr Guiral Broto each to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/28

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2017 — Marcas Costa Brava v EUIPO — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl)

(Case T-689/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl - Earlier EU figurative mark café crem - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 078/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Marcas Costa Brava, SL (Sils, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J. Manresa Medina, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Excellent Brands JMI Ltd (Baar, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Majer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 September 2015 (Case R 2491/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Marcas Costa Brava and Excellent Brands JMI.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Marcas Costa Brava, SL, to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 48, 8.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 70/19

Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2017 — Nausicaa Anadyomène and Banque d’escompte v ECB

(Case T-749/15) (1)

((Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - ECB - National central banks - Restructuring of the Greek public debt - Programme for purchasing securities - Securities exchange agreement for the sole benefit of central banks in the Eurosystem - Private sector involvement - Collective action clauses - Credit enhancement in the form of a buyback programme intended to support the quality of the securities as collateral - Private creditors - Commercial banks - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Legitimate expectations - Equal treatment))

(2017/C 070/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Nausicaa Anadyomène SAS (Paris, France) and Banque d’escompte (Paris) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: O. Heinz, G. Varhelyi and F. von Lindeiner, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the loss allegedly sustained by the applicants following, in particular, the adoption of ECB Decision 2012/153/EU of 5 March 2012 on the eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic in the context of the Hellenic Republic’s debt exchange offer (ECB/2012/3) (OJ 2012 L 77, p. 19) and also of other ECB measures linked to the restructuring of the Greek public debt.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Nausicaa Anadyomène SAS and Banque d’escompte to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 121/28

Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2017 — Labeyrie v EUIPO — Delpeyrat (Representation of a sowing of golden fish on a blue background)

(Case T-766/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark representing a sowing of golden fish on a blue background - Declaration of revocation - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form that differs in elements does not alter the distinctive character))

(2017/C 121/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Labeyrie (Saint-Geours-de-Maremne, France) (represented by: A. Lecomte, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Delpeyrat (Saint-Pierre-du-Mont, France) (represented by: J. Ennochi, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 October 2015 (Case R 2693/2014-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Depeyrat and Labeyrie.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Labeyrie to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by EUIPO;

3. Orders Delpeyrat to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 95/10

Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2017 — Schönberger v Court of Auditors

(Case T-688/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2011 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 - Rejection of the action at first instance, after its referral back by the General Court, as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded - Prospect of promotion))

(2017/C 095/17)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Peter Schönberger (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: O. Mader, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Court of Auditors (represented by: Í. Ní Riagáin Düro and B. Schäfer, Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2015, Schönberger v Court of Auditors (F-14/12 RENV, EU:F:2015:112), and seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Declares that Mr P. Schönberger is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Court of Auditors in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 151/30

Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2017 — J & Joy v EUIPO — Joy-Sportswear (J AND JOY)

(Case T-387/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - EU word mark J AND JOY - Earlier national figurative mark joy SPORTSWEAR - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods - Similarity of the signs - Assessment criteria - Composite mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 151/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: J & Joy SA (Waremme, Belgium) (represented by: A. Maqua, C. Pirenne and C. Smits, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Joy-Sportswear GmbH (Ottensoos, Germany), (represented by: T. Kiphuth, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 April 2015 (Case R 1352/2014-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Joy-Sportswear and J & Joy.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders J & Joy SA to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.