ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 145/39

Action brought on 5 February 2016 — ZZ v EMA

(Case F-8/16)

(2016/C 145/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s staff report for 2014 and the decision of 1 April 2015 of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff and claim for damages for the non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

— Annul the applicant’s staff report covering the period from 16 February 2014 to 31 December 2014, as finalised on 31 March 2015 by the Assessor and countersigned by the applicant on 14 April 2015;

— Annul the decision of the AECCE of 1 April 2015 not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff;

— Annul both decisions of the AECCE of 26 October 2015 rejecting the two claims made by the applicant of 30 June 2015 against the two abovementioned decisions;

— Award the applicant damages in the sum of EUR 10 000;
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 371/33

Action brought on 26 August 2016 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-47/16)

(2016/C 371/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The application to annul the decision not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted in the context of the 2015 annul promotion exercise.

Form of order sought

— annul AIPN’s decision not to promote the applicant in the 2015 promotion exercise;
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 296/47

Action brought on 22 June 2016 — ZZ v CEDEFOP

(Case F-31/16)

(2016/C 296/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the appointing authority’s decision not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted under the 2015 annual promotion procedure at the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) and an application for damages in respect of the non-material and material harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— annul the appointing authority’s decision of non-promotion dated 4 November 2015 in so far as it concerns the applicant;

— order the CEDEFOP agency to pay compensation in respect of the harm suffered;
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/52

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 December 2007 — Wandschneider v Commission

(Case F-65/05) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Appraisal - Career development report - Appraisal for the year 2003 - Action for annulment - Reasons - Manifest error of assessment)

(2008/C 22/97)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Paolo Sequeira Wandschneider (Brussels, Belgium) (represented originally by G. Vandersanden and C. Ronzi, lawyers, and then by G. Vandersanden, C. Ronzi and L. Levi, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the applicant's career development report for the appraisal year 2003 and also a claim for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action.

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 229 of 17.9.2005, p. 32 (Case originally registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-282/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/59

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Sørensen v Commission

(Case F-85/05) (1)

(Staff cases - Officials - Appointment - Officials advancing to a higher function group by open competition - Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment - Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules - Article 5(2) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

2010/C 346/117

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Susanne Sørensen (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Arpio Santacruz and M. Simm, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision classifying the applicant, who was placed on a reserve list B prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations, pursuant to the less favourable provisions of those regulations (Article 12 of Annex XIII to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials), and annulment of the decision to cancel the promotion points acquired by the applicant as a category C official

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses Ms Sørensen’s action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 296, 26.11.05, p. 26 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under the number T-335/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/19

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Full Court) of 24 June 2008 — Carlos Andres and Others v European Central Bank

(Case F-15/05) (1)

(Staff case - ECB staff - Remuneration - Consultation of the ECB staff committee - Method of calculation of annual salary adjustment - Enforcement of a judgment of a Community judicature - Retroactivity)

(2008/C 260/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Carlos Andrés and Others (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Zilioli and K. Sugar, Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the applicants' salary slips for the month of July 2004, in so far as they contain an salary increase set in accordance with an allegedly unlawful method of annual salary adjustment and that increase does not have retroactive effect with regard to the years 2001, 2002 and 2003, and, secondly, an application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 132, 28.5.2005, p. 32 (Case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-131/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 209/69

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 6 March 2008 — Skareby v Commission

(Case F-46/06) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Appraisal - Career development report - 2004 appraisal procedure - Objectives - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment)

(2008/C 209/125)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Carina Skareby (Bichkek, Kirghizistan) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and Y. Minatchy, lawyers, then by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and M.Velardo, agents)

Re:

First, annulment of the applicant's career development report for 2004 and, secondly, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. dismisses the action;

2. orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 143 of 17.6.2006, p. 39.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 22/54

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2007 — Van Neyghem v Commission

(Case F-73/06) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Open competition - Assessment of the written test - Time-limit for lodging a complaint - Admissibility - Duty to state reasons)

(2008/C 22/102)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Kris Van Neyghem (Vissenaken, Belgium) (represented: initially by S. Rodrigues, A. Jaume and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers, then by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and M. Velardo)

Re:

Annulment of the EPSO decision of 1 June 2005 not to admit the applicant to the oral test of Competition EPSO/A/19/04 by reason of the insufficient result of his written test, and, secondly, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 190 of 12.8.2006, p. 37.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 340/35

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — Saintraint v Commission

(Case F-103/06 REV)

(Staff case - Procedure - Application for revision - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal - Decision of the Tribunal - Application for revision of an order removing a case from the register following discontinuance - No binding effect - Inadmissibility raised by the Tribunal of its own motion)

2011/C 340/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Antoine Saintraint (La Paz, Bolivia) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for revision by the applicant against the Order of the First Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 September 2010, in Case F-103/06.

Operative part of the judgment

1. The application for revision is dimissed as inadmissible.

2. The applicant for revision is ordered to pay the costs of the Commission.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/49

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2008 — Schell v Commission

(Case F-83/06) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - Priority points - General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations)

(2009/C 32/95)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Arno Schell (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and M. Velardo, Agents)

Re:

Staff case — Annulment, primarily, of the lists of officials promoted in the 2004 and 2005 promotion years, in so far as those lists do not contain the applicant's name and, in the alternative, of the allocation of promotion points in those years in so far as the applicant is concerned

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 18.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 260/20

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 24 June 2008 — Agim Islamaj v Commission

(Case F-84/07) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Former members of the temporary staff paid from research appropriations - Promotion - Cancellation of points from the ‘rucksack’ - Transfer of an official from the research part to the administration part of the general budget)

(2008/C 260/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Agim Islamaj (Grimbergen, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and L. Lozano Palacios, then by C. Berardis-Kayser and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision to cancel the 38,5 points from the applicant's ‘rucksack’ which he accumulated as a member of the temporary staff — Application for a declaration that Article 2 of the Commission Decision on detailed rules governing the promotion procedure for officials paid from research appropriations in the general budget is unlawful.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Mr Islamaj to bear two thirds of his own costs;

3. Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay, in addition to its own costs, one third of Mr Islamaj's costs.

(1) OJ C 235, 6.10.2007, p. 33.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 193/34

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2009 — Campos Valls v Council

(Case F-39/07) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Recruitment - Appointment - Post of Head of Unit - Rejection of the applicant’s candidature - Conditions required for the notice of vacancy - Manifest error of assessment)

2009/C 193/55

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Manuel Campos Valls (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Arpio Santacruz and I. Šulce, Agents)

Re:

First, annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority to reject the applicant’s candidature for the post of head of the Spanish Language Unit of DG A, Directorate 3 — Translation and Document Production — Language Service, referred to in Staff Note CP46/06 and, second, of the decision to appoint another candidate to that post.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 129, 9.6.2007, p. 28.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 44/70

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 December 2008 — Collotte v Commission

(Case F-58/07) (1)

(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2006 promotion procedure - Ability to work in a third language)

(2009/C 44/122)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Pascal Collotte (Abstraat, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, initially, and É. Boigelot and L. Defalque, subsequently, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, initially, and C. Berardis-Kayser and L. Lozano Palacios, subsequently, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: I. Šulce and M. Simm, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade A*12 in the 2006 promotion procedure for failure to demonstrate the ability to work in a third language — Claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities not to include Mr Collotte's name on the list of officials promoted to grade A*12 for the 2006 promotion procedure;

2. Dismisses the remainder of the forms of order sought;

3. Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the applicant;

4. Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 199, 25.8.2007, p. 50.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 340/35

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Angé Serrano v Parliament

(Case F-9/07) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Change of category under the old Staff Regulations - Transitional rules for grading as at 1 May 2004 - Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 13 February 2006 - Reclassification on the basis of the salary of officials receiving a compensatory payment - Applicable multiplier - Loss of promotion points - Claim for compensation)

2011/C 340/70

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Pilar Angé Serrano (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented: initially by C. Burgos and K. Zejdová, Agents, and subsequently by L.G. Knudsen and K. Zejdová, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented: initially by M. Simm and I. Šulce, and subsequently by K. Zieleśkiewicz, M. Bauer and J. Monteiro, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the European Parliament’s decision regrading the applicant at grade B*6, step 8; she had been included on the reserve list following an internal competition for change of category, before the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations, under the latter’s less favourable provisions — Claim for compensation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs;

3. Orders the Council of the European Union, the intervener, to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 69 of 24.03.07, p. 31.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 24/71

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2009 — Rebizant, Vlandas and Vocino v Commission

(Case F-94/07) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - 2006 procedure - Multiplier rate - Article 6(2) of the Staff Regulations - Article 9 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Promotion threshold)

2010/C 24/129

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Jean Rebizant (Karlsruhe, Germany), Georges Vlandas (Brussels, Belgium) and Vinceno Vocino (Varese, Italy) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

First, annulment of the decision not to promote the applicants to grade AD13 under the 2006 promotion procedure and, second, declaration that the decision setting the promotion thresholds applicable to officials under the “Research” and “Joint Research Centre” budgets is illegal.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 283, 24.11.2007, p. 45.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 19/37

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 4 December 2008 — Blias v ECB

(Case F-6/08) (1)

(Staff case - ECB staff - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Conditions set out in Article 17 of the ECB conditions of employment - Applicant ordered to pay the costs - Requirements of fairness - Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure)

(2009/C 19/73)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Jessica Blias (Frankfurt on Main, Germany) (represented by: B. Karthaus, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. Malfrère and F. Feyerbacher, Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Staff cases — Annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank of 15 August 2007 refusing to grant the applicant entitlement to the expatriation allowance on the ground that she does not fulfil the conditions set out in Article 17 of the Conditions of Employment of the ECB.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Ms Blias to pay, in addition to her own costs, half the costs of the European Central Bank;

3. Orders the European Central Bank to pay half of its own costs.

(1) OJ C 142, 7.6.2008, p. 39.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 297/35

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 7 October 2009 — Y v Commission

(Case F-29/08) (1)

(Contract staff - Dismissal for obviously inadequate work - Conduct in the service inadequate)

2009/C 297/53

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Y (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment of 24 May 2007 to dismiss the applicant as a member of the contract staff on account of the applicant’s allegedly inadequate conduct in the service and compensation for the material and non-material damage suffered

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. orders Y to pay all the costs.

(1) OJ C 116, of 09.05.2008 p. 35.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/51

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 January 2009 — Klein v Commission

(Case F-32/08) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Pensions - Invalidity pension - Death - Definition of dependent child - Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Death allowance - Death grant - Orphans' pension)

(2009/C 55/93)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marie-Claude Klein (Grasse, France) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Appointing Authority's decision of 4 May 2007 refusing to grant the applicant entitlement to a death grant, a death allowance and an orphans' pension.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Ms Klein to pay all the costs.

(1) OJ C 116, 9.5.2008, p. 36.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/37

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Cerafogli v European Central Bank

(Case F-96/08) (1)

(Civil service - ECB Staff - Pay - Additional increase in salary - Ad personam promotion - Consultation with staff committee to determine the criteria for granting additional increases in salary)

2011/C 13/70

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Maria Concetta Cerafogli (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. Alfrère and N. Urban, Agents and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Annulment of the ECB Decision not to award the applicant the benefit of an ad personam promotion and an order that the defendant pay compensation for the applicant’s pain and suffering.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Annuls the decision by which the European Central Back refused to grant Mrs Cerafogli an additional increase in salary for 2008;

2. Orders the European Central Bank to pay Mrs Cerafogli the sum of EUR 3 000;

3. Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

4. Order the European Central Bank to pay all of the costs.

(1) OJ C 44, 21.02.2009, p. 75.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 24/74

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 19 November 2009 — N v Parliament

(Case F-71/08) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Appraisal - Staff report - Setting of objectives - Manifest error of assessment - Admissibility - Act which does not adversely affect an official)

2010/C 24/137

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: N (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Zejdová, R. Ignătescu and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the applicant’s staff report for the period from 16/8/2006 to 31/12/2006.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Annuls the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 12 September 2007 adopting N’s definitive staff report for the period from 16 August 2006 to 31 December 2006;

2. Rejects the remainder of the application;

3. Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 272, 25.10.2008, p. 51.