ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/15

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2015 — Stichting Woonlinie and Others v Commission

(Case T-202/10 RENV) (1)

((State aid - Social housing - Scheme of aid granted to housing corporations - Existing aid - Decision accepting Member State’s commitments - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 221/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Stichting Woonlinie (Woudrichem, Netherlands); Stichting Allee Wonen (Roosendaal, Netherlands); Woningstichting Volksbelang (Wijk bij Duurstede, Netherlands); Stichting WoonInvest (Leidschendam-Voorburg, Netherlands); Stichting Woonstede (Ede, Netherlands) (represented initially by P. Glazener and E. Henny and subsequently by P. Glazener, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal and S. Noë, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Kingdom of Belgium (represented initially by T. Materne and J.-C. Halleux and subsequently by J.-C. Halleux, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) (Voorburg, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Meulenbelt, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 — Netherlands — Existing and special project aid to housing corporations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Orders Stichting Woonlinie, Stichting Allee Wonen, Woningstichting Volksbelang, Stichting WoonInvest and Stichting Woonstede to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 120/13

Order of the President of the General Court of 2 March 2011 — Rheinischer Sparkassen- und Giroverband v Commission

(Case T-27/11 R)

(Interim proceedings - Application for interim measures - Manifest inadmissibility)

2011/C 120/32

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Rheinischer Sparkassen- und Giroverband (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Rosenfeld and I. Liebach, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, B. Martenczuk and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2010) 9525 final of 21 December 2010 concerning State aid No MC 8/2009 and C 43/2009 — Germany — WestLB transfers, in so far as it follows therefrom that there must be no new transactions involving Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG after 15 February 2011.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/24

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 July 2011 — HeidelbergCement v Commission

(Case T-302/11 R)

(Interim relief - Competition - Request for information - Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 282/51

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: HeidelbergCement AG (Heidelberg, Germany) (represented by: U. Denzel, T. Holzmüller and P. Pichler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Kellerbauer, R. Sauer and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2011) 2363 final of 30 March 2011 concerning a proceeding pursuant to Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39.520 — Cement and related products)

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/17

Order of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Fortress Participations v OHIM — FIG and Fortress Investment Group (FORTRESS)

(Case T-315/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 200/35

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fortress Participations BV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented, initially, by: L.J. van de Braak, avocat, B. Ladas, Solicitor, and S. Malynicz, Barrister, then, by: L.J. van de Braak, S. Malynicz, R. Black, Solicitor, and V. Baxter, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: FIG LLC (New York, United States); and Fortress Investment Group (UK) Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Gray and R. Mallinson, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 March 2011 (Case R 355/2009-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between FIG LLC and Fortress Investment Group (UK), on the one hand, and Fortress Participations BV, on the other.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The interveners are ordered to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/33

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann and Others v Commission

(Case T-379/11 R)

(Interim relief - Environment - Allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC - Setting of the product benchmarks the subject of the Commission’s decision - Application for interim measures - Admissibility - Urgency)

2011/C 347/59

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH (Duisburg, Germany); Rogesa — Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH (Dillingen, Germany); Salzgitter Flachstahl GmbH (Salzgitter, Allemagne); ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG (Duisburg); and voestalpine Stahl GmbH (Linz, Austria) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and C. Dittrich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wilms, K. Mifsud-Bonnici and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 130, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/28

Order of the General Court of 2 September 2011 — Versus Bank v Council

(Case T-121/11) (1)

2011/C 319/59

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 49/33

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Maxima Grupė v OHIM — Bodegas Maximo (MAXIMA PREMIUM)

(Case T-523/11) (1)

2012/C 49/60

Language of the case: English

The President of the General Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 2 December 2011 — Carbunión v Council

(Case T-176/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision on aid intended to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of standing to bring proceedings - Lack of concordance with the main action - Non-severability - Inadmissibility - Balance of interests)

(2012/C 25/101)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: K. Desai, Solicitor, S. Cisnal de Ugarte and M. Peristeraki, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by F. Florindo Gijón and A. Lo Monaco, and subsequently by F. Florindo Gijón and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for partial suspension of operation of Council Decision 2010/787/EU of 10 December 2010 on State aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines (OJ 2010 L 336, p. 24) and, in the alternative, application for full suspension of operation of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 126/18

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2012 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Jacinto (My Little Bear)

(Case T-183/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Expiry of the earlier national mark - Action devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 126/36

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Manuel Jacinto, Lda (S. Paio de Oleiros, Portugal)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 January 2011 (Case R 494/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Manuel Jacinto, Lda, and MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/24

Order of the General Court of 10 February 2012 — AG v Parliament

(Case T-98/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Time-limit for bringing action - Lateness - Appeal clearly unfounded)

2012/C 89/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: AG (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and V. Montebello-Demogeot, agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 16 December 2010 in Case F-25/10 AG v Parliament, not yet reported in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal as dismissed as clearly unfounded.

2. AG is ordered to pay, apart from its own costs, the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 120, 16.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 250/14

Order of the General Court of 21 June 2012 — Hamas v Council

(Case T-531/11) (1)

(Annulment action - Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism - Lis pendens)

2012/C 250/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Hamas (Damascus, Syria and Gaza, Gaza Strip) (represented by: L. Glock, lawyer)

Defendant: Council (represented: initially by T. Szostak and G. Marhic, and subsequently by B. Driessen and G.Étienne, Agents)

Re:

Initially, action for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 687/2011 of 18 July 2011 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulations No 610/2010 and (EU) No 83/2011 (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 2), and Council Decision 2011/430/CFSP of 18 July 2011 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 47), in so far as the applicant organisation’s name is maintained on the list of persons, groups and entities to which the freezing of funds and economic resources laid down with a view to combating terrorism.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. There is no need to give a ruling on the European Commission’s application for leave to intervene.

3. Hamas is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 151/29

Order of the General Court of 23 March 2012 — Ecologistas en Acción v Commission

(Case T-341/11) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Express decision adopted after the bringing of the action - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 151/48

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Ecologistas en Acción-CODA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Doreste Hernández, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Martínez del Peral and P. Costa de Oliveira, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by: M. Muñoz Pérez and J.M. Rodriguez Cârcamo, lawyers, thereafter by S. Centeno Huerta, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision refusing the applicant access to certain documents concerning the approval of the project for the construction of a port in Granadilla (Tenerife, Spain) supplied by the Spanish authorities to the Commission pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs and those incurred by Ecologistas en Acción-CODA.

3. The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 366/34

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2012 — Cervelli v Commission

(Case T-622/11 P) (1)

(Appeals - Civil service - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Request for review - New facts - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2012/C 366/67

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Francesca Cervelli (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2011 in Case F-98/10 Cervelli v Commission, and seeking that that order be set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Ms Francesca Cervelli shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 287/31

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2012 — L’Oréal v OHIM — United Global Media Group (MyBeauty TV)

(Case T-240/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Costs recoverable before OHIM - Costs of being represented by an employee - Article 85(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2012/C 287/57

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and S. Abel, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: United Global Media Group, Inc. (El Segundo, California, United States)

Re:

Action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2011 (Case R 898/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between United Global Media Group, Inc. and L’Oréal.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. L’Oréal SA is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/18

Order of the General Court of 6 December 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Royal Mediterranea (THAI SPA)

(Case T-664/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Limitation of services covered by the Community trade mark application - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 32/28

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: L. de Brouwer, E. Cornu and É. De Gryse, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Royal Mediterranea, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 October 2011 (Case R 1976/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV and Royal Mediterranea, SA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/46

Order of the General Court of 13 November 2012 — ClientEarth and Others v European Commission

(Case T-278/11) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Delay - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 26/90

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom); Friends of the Earth Europe (Amsterdam, Netherlands); Stichting FERN (Leiden, Netherlands); and Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory (Amsterdam) (represented by: P. Kirch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and C. ten Dam, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision of 22 April 2011 refusing access to certain documents relating to the voluntary certification schemes for seeking recognition from the Commission under Article 18 of Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ 2009 L 140, p. 16).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay three quarters of the costs of ClientEarth, Friends of the Earth Europe, Stichting FERN and Corporate Europe Observatory, which shall bear one quarter of their own costs.

(1) OJ C 219, 23.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 189/22

Order of the General Court of 14 May 2013 — Régie Networks and NRJ Global v Commission

(Case T-273/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - State aid scheme implemented by France in favour of radio broadcasting - Decision not to raise objections - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 189/45

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Régie Networks (Lyon, France) and NRJ Global (Paris, France) (represented by: B. Geneste and C. Vannini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 6483 final of 29 September 2010 concerning the State aid scheme No C-4/2009 (ex N 679/97) implemented by the [French Republic] to promote radio broadcasting and declaring that scheme compatible with the internal market, subject to compliance with certain conditions.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Régie Networks and NRJ Global shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 71/21

Order of the General Court of 11 January 2013 — Charron Inox and Almet v Council and Commission

(Joined Cases T-445/11 and T-88/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Action for damages - Dumping - Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in China - Provisional antidumping duty - No need to adjudicate - Definitive antidumping duty - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2013/C 71/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Charron Inox (Marseille, France), and Almet (Satolas-et Bonce, France) (represented by: P.-O. Koubi-Flotte, lawyer)

Defendants: Council of the Eurpoean Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, and G. Berrisch and A. Polcyn, lawyers (Case T-88/12) and European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, acting as Agents) (Case T-445/11)

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, acting as Agents) (Case T-88/12)

Re:

In Case T-445/11, principally, annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 627/2011 of 27 June 2011 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2011 L 169, p. 1) and, in the alternative, an application for damages for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following the immediate entry into force of the contested regulation and, in Case T-88/12, principally, annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2011 of 14 December 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2011 L 336, p. 6) and, in the alternative, a claim for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicants in consequence of the definitive collection of the provisional duty ordered in that regulation.

Operative part of the order

1. Cases T-445/11 and T-88/12 are joined for the purposes of the order

2. The objections as to admissibility raised in Cases T-445/11 and T-88/12 are joined to the main actions.

3. There is no further need to adjudicate in Case T-445/11.

4. The action in Case T-88/12 is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law.

5. Charron Inox and Almet shall pay all the costs of Case T-445/11.

6. Charron Inox and Almet shall pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in Case T-88/12 and shall bear their own costs thereof.

7. The European Commission shall bear its own costs in Case T-88/12.

(1) OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 359/11

Order of the General Court of 9 October 2013 — Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs v Commission

(Case T-259/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Phare programme - Project concerning the development of a centre for innovation and testing of construction products - Commission decision to undertake recovery of part of the sums paid - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 359/19

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Applicant: Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs (Jelgava, Latvia) (represented by: E. Darapoļskis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. van Nuffel and A. Sauka, Agents)

Re:

Action brought by the association Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs in accordance with Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision notified to the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Latvia by letter dated 16 November 2010.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The application for access to Commission documents is also dismissed.

3. Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs shall pay the costs.

4. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene from the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania.

(1) OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.