ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Telecom Italia SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Vodafone Italia SpA, Lindam Srl v Roma Capitale, Regione Lazio, Vodafone Italia SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Wind Telecomunicazioni SpA

(Case C-368/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Approximation of laws - Electronic communications networks and services - Restrictions on the installation of mobile phone base transceiver stations established by local authorities - Insufficient details concerning the reasons why an answer to the question referred is necessary for the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 313/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Telecom Italia SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Vodafone Italia SpA, Lindam Srl

Respondents: Roma Capitale, Regione Lazio, Vodafone Italia SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Wind Telecomunicazioni SpA

Interveners: Regione Lazio, Wind Tre SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Ente Suore Francescane Missionarie del Cuore Immacolato di Maria and Others, Agenzia Regionale Protezione Ambiente (ARPA), Congregazione delle Religiose di Gesù e Maria

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy), by decision of 2 February 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Order of the Court of (Ninth Chamber) 2 April 2020 — International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) v European Commission

(Case C-553/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Approximation of laws - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products - Establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products - Delegated Regulation and implementing acts - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - Lack of direct concern - Article 256(1), second subparagraph, TFEU - Article 58, first paragraph, of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - No precise identification of the contested points in the grounds of the judgment under appeal or specific legal arguments in support of the appeal - Arguments seeking to obtain from the Court a mere re-examination of the arguments presented at first instance - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

(2020/C 287/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) (represented by: F. Scanvic, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene and C. Valero, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2. International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 2 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg — Austria) — CT v VINI GmbH

(Case C-805/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/47)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 24 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Frontline Digital GmbH

(Case C-438/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/35)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 8 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt — Germany) — EP v Kreis Groß-Gerau

(Case C-905/19) (1)

(2020/C 329/23)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 12 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta — Spain) — DC v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA

(Case C-522/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/37)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers — Belgium) — X v État belge

(Case C-671/19) (1)

(2020/C 443/21)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — AS ‘4finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

(Case C-944/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/42)

Language of the case: Latvian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 4 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 17 de Barcelona — Spain) — UD v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona

(Case C-746/19) (1)

(2021/C 79/34)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court of Justice has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
3.

Articles 3 and 8 of Directive 93/13, read in conjunction with Articles 6 and 7 of that Directive, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the context of an examination of its own motion of the potentially unfair nature of terms in a contract concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer, carried out by the national court in order to determine whether there is a significant imbalance between the obligations of the parties under that contract, that court may also take into account national provisions ensuring a higher level of protection for consumers than that provided for by that directive.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 1 September 2021 — European Commission v HSBC Holdings plc, HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Continental Europe, formerly HSBC France

(Case C-806/19 P) (1)

(2021/C 471/39)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 432, 23.12.2019.
Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 11 February 2021 — Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, Hafize Darya Shipping Lines (HDSL), Safiran Payam Darya Shipping Lines (SAPID), Khazar Sea Shipping Lines Co., Rahbaran Omid Darya Ship Management Co., Irinvestship Ltd, IRISL Europe GmbH v Council of the European Union

(Case C-506/19 P) (1)

(2021/C 182/64)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 319, 23.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Schwechat — Austria) — JU v Air France Direktion für Österreich

(Case C-93/20) (1)

(2020/C 329/26)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 December 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège — Belgium) — Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil) v Mr M. (C-67/20), Ms C. (C-68/20), Ms C. (C-69/20)

(Joined Cases C-67/20 to C-69/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 79/19)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil)

Defendants: Mr M. (C-67/20), Ms C. (C-68/20), Ms C. (C-69/20)

Operative part of the order

There is no need to adjudicate on the requests for a preliminary ruling made by the cour du travail de Liège (Belgium) by decisions of 10 February 2020.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 14 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Eurowings GmbH v GDVI Verbraucherhilfe GmbH

(Case C-365/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/62)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 390, 16.11.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 27 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg — Germany) — QY v Bank 11 für Privatkunden und Handel GmbH

(Case C-336/20) (1)

(2021/C 289/45)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 5 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — PR, BV v Germanwings GmbH

(Case C-558/20) (1)

(2021/C 182/66)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2021 — Crédit agricole SA (C-456/20 P), Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (C-457/20 P), CA Consumer Finance (C-458/20 P) v European Central Bank

(Joined Cases C-456/20 P to C-458/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Economic and monetary policy - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Article 18(1) - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Conferral of specific tasks on the European Central Bank (ECB) - Infliction of an administrative financial penalty for breach of prudential requirements - Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Article 26(3) - Own funds requirements - Capital instruments - Issuance of ordinary shares - Classification as Common Equity Tier 1 (CET 1) - No prior authorisation by the competent authority - Negligent breach)

(2021/C 357/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Crédit agricole SA (C-456/20 P), Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (C-457/20 P), CA Consumer Finance (C-458/20 P) (represented by: A. Champsaur and A. Delors, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta, A. Pizzolla and D. Segoin, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeals are dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

2. Crédit agricole SA, Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and CA Consumer Finance shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux — France) — Criminal proceedings against ENR Grenelle Habitat SARL, EP, FQ

(Case C-88/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Fundamental rights - Ne bis in idem principle - Joint imposition of administrative and criminal penalties for identical facts - Cold calling - Misleading commercial practice - Insufficient justification for a reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 320/11)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux

Criminal proceedings against

ENR Grenelle Habitat SARL, EP, FQ

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux (Criminal Court, Bordeaux, France), by decision of 12 December 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 1 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovakia) — Generálna prokuratura Slovenskej republiky v M.B.

(Case C-78/20) (1)

(2021/C 471/41)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — IO, SP, DR v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-526/20) (1)

(2021/C 368/16)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2022 — (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Parma — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against ZI, TQ

(Case C-437/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Games of chance - Licences for the activity of collecting bets - Extension of existing licences - Regularisation of data transmission centres (DTC) engaged in collecting bets without the necessary licence and police authorisation - Short deadline - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

(2022/C 165/26)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Parma

Parties in the main criminal proceedings

ZI, TQ

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunale di Parma (Parma District Court, Italy), by decision of 8 November 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) Date lodged: 17/09/2020.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Sofia — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against VD

(Case C-654/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Transport - Directive 2006/126/EC - Driving licences - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 49 - Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties - Driving a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence - Penalties - Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Absence of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 368/03)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Apelativen sad — Sofia

Party to the main criminal proceedings

VD

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Apelativen sad Sofia (Court of Appeal, Sofia, Bulgaria), by decision of 9 November 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège — Belgium) — VW v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil)

(Case C-92/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Border controls, asylum and immigration - Asylum policy - Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection - Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) - Article 27 - Remedies against a transfer decision - Suspensive effect of the remedy - Article 29 - Modalities and time limits for transfers - Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection - Directive 2013/33/EU - Article 18 - National measure allocating to an applicant in respect of whom a transfer decision has been made a place in a specific reception facility where those accommodated receive support in preparing to be transferred)

(2021/C 289/28)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VW

Defendant: Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil)

Operative part of the order

Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person, is to be interpreted as not precluding a Member State from adopting, in relation to an applicant who has brought an appeal against a decision to transfer him to another Member State as referred to in Article 26(1) of that regulation, measures preparatory to such a transfer, such as the allocation of a place in a specific reception facility where those accommodated receive support in preparing for their transfer.

(1) OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 20 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — L GmbH v F GmbH, BW, SW

(Case C-336/21) (1)

(2021/C 513/37)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 349, 30.8.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v ZR

(Case C-107/21) (1)

(2021/C 368/30)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 182, 10.05.2021.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM) v BF

(Case C-151/21) (1)

(Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Principle of non-discrimination - Field of public health - Calculation of length-of-service increments - National legislation refusing to take into account, as regards permanent staff regulated under administrative law, for the purpose of calculating length-of-service increments, periods corresponding to activities temporarily exercised in a higher professional category)

(2022/C 119/18)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM)

Respondent: BF

Operative part of the order

Clause 4 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is set out in the annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which provides that, for a permanent worker who temporarily performs duties in a professional category that is higher than the one to which he or she belongs, the three-yearly length-of-service increments to which he or she is entitled are those corresponding to that latter category, even though, for a fixed-term worker placed in the same situation, the three-yearly length-of-service increments correspond to those of the professional category in which his or her duties were actually performed.

(1) Date lodged: 9 March 2021.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Arad — Romania) — Asociaţia Naţională de Terapii Complementare din România (ANATECOR)

(Case C-400/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Interpretation of national law - National insolvency proceedings - Possibility for the insolvency judge to determine his or her substantive jurisdiction and the claim - Purely internal dispute - Lack of connection with EU law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2022/C 84/26)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Arad

Parties to the main proceedings

Insolvency debtor: Asociaţia Naţională de Terapii Complementare din România (ANATECOR)

Intervening parties: Primăria Municipiului Arad — Direcția Venituri, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Timișoara — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Arad

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Tribunalul Arad (Regional Court, Arad, Romania) by decision of 31 May 2021.

(1) Date lodged: 28.6.2021.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — Criminal proceedings against K.M.

(Case C-493/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Common fisheries policy - Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 - Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy - Article 89 - Measures to ensure compliance - Article 90 - Criminal sanctions - Principle of proportionality - Interpretation of the judgment of 11 February 2021, K. M. (Sanctions imposed on the master of a vessel) (C-77/20, EU:C:2021:112))

(2022/C 222/07)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: K.M.

Other party: Director of Public Prosecutions

Operative part of the order

Articles 89 and 90 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006, read in the light of the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as meaning that it is for the national courts to assess, in accordance with the assessment criteria provided by the Court in the judgment of 11 February 2021, K. M. (Sanctions imposed on the master of a vessel) (C-77/20, EU:C:2021:112), whether, in relation to the infringement committed, including its seriousness, the mandatory forfeiture of all catch and all fishing gear found on board the vessel concerned is proportionate to the attainment of the objective legitimately pursued by the prohibition, laid down in Article 32(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 227/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2013, relating to grading equipment, and to examine, if necessary, the need to adjust, modulate or mitigate the extent of the forfeiture order in respect of the catch and the fishing gear.

(1) OJ C 401, 4.10.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Stade — Germany) — Applicant 1, Applicant 2, Antragsteller 3, Applicant 4, Applicant 5 v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-504/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/39)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.