ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 25 November 2014 — Trefilerías Quijano v Commission

(Joined Cases T-427/10 and T-576/10 and Case T-439/12) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Competition - Cartels - European prestressing steel market - Price fixing, market sharing and exchange of sensitive commercial information - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Decision amending the initial decision without affecting the fines imposed on the applicant - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Partial manifest inadmissibility)

(2015/C 073/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Trefilerías Quijano, SA (Los Corrales de Buelna, Spain) (represented by: in Cases T-427/10 and T-576/10, F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, and, in Case T-439/12, initially F. González Díaz and P. Herrero Prieto, then F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and V. Bottka, and, in Case T-439/12, C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents, and by L. Ortiz Blanco, lawyer)

Re:

Applications for annulment and alteration of Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel), amended by Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 and by Commission Decision C (2011) 2269 final of 4 April 2011, and by the letter COMP/G2/DVE/nvz/79465 from the Commission’s Director-General for Competition of 25 July 2012.

Operative part of the order

1. In Case T-427/10, the form of order seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 amending Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel) is rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

2. In Case T-576/10, the action is rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

3. The remainder of the pleas in law and forms of order sought is reserved.

4. Trefilerías Quijano, SA is ordered to pay the costs relating to the pleas in law and forms of order directed against Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 amending Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel) made in Case T-427/10 and the costs in Case T-576/10.

(1) OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/28

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2011 — Yao N'Dré v Council

(Case T-122/11) (1)

2011/C 319/60

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/49

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 July 2011 — SIR v Council

(Case T-142/11 R)

(Applications for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Freezing of funds - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No need to adjudicate in the main proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 269/109

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société ivoirienne de raffinage (SIR) (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, in accordance with Article 278 TFEU, suspension of the operation, first, of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36) and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to rule on the application for interim measures.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/20

Order of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — Pieno žvaigždės v OHIM — Fattoria Scaldasole (Iogurt.)

(Case T-135/10) (1)

2012/C 13/42

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/44

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — BA&SH (ba&sh)

(Case T-23/11) (1)

2011/C 347/82

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) C 80, 12.3.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 80/26

Order of the General Court of 26 January 2012 — Symfiliosi v FRA

(Case T-397/11) (1)

2012/C 80/48

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/21

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Rheinischer Sparkassen- und Giroverband v Commission

(Case T-27/11) (1)

2012/C 39/42

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/20

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Timab Industries and CFPR v Commission

(Case T-211/11) (1)

2012/C 200/42

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 179, 18.6.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 109/13

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 February 2012 — Hassan v Council

(Case T-572/11 R)

(Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2012/C 109/29

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Samir Hassan (Damas, Syria) (represented by: É. Morgan de Rivery and E. Lagathu, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou and M. Vitsentzatos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures, in particular, application for suspension of operation of Council Implementing Decision 2011/515/CFSP of 23 August 2011 implementing Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 218, p. 20) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2011 of 23 August 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 218, p. 1) insofar as those texts refer to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 287/39

Order of the General Court of 11 July 2012 — Formica v OHIM — Silicalia (CompacTop)

(Case T-82/11) (1)

2012/C 287/71

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 113, 9.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 250/15

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2012 — Technion and Technion Research & Development Foundation v Commission

(Case T-546/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities - Letter confirming the findings of an audit report and informing the applicant of the next steps in the procedure - Acts inseparable from the contract - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 250/28

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Technion — Israel Institute of Technology (Haifa, Israel) and Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd (Haifa) (represented by: D. Grisay and D. Piccininno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and B. Conte, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the letter of the Commission of 2 August 2011 confirming the conclusions of the financial audit concerning the financial statements declared by Technion — Israel Institute of Technology, concerning four contracts concluded under the sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European research area and to innovation (2002-06), and informing Technion of the next steps in the procedure.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Technion — Israel Institute of Technology and Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 399/22

Order of the General Court of 23 October 2012 — Chivas v OHIM — Glencairn Scotch Whisky (LIVE WITH CHIVALRY)

(Case T-181/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Opposition withdrawn - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 399/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chivas Holdings (IP) Ltd (Paisley, Renfrewshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Carboni, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Glencairn Scotch Whisky Co. Ltd (Glasgow, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Lumsdaine, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Frist Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2011 (Case R-1263/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Glencairn Scotch Whisky Co. Ltd and Chivas Holdings (IP) Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener are each ordered to bear their own costs and to pay half the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 355/38

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2012 — Skyhawke Technologies v OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting and Sky IP International (SKYCADDIE)

(Case T-484/11) (1)

2012/C 355/80

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 319, 29.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/12

Order of the General Court of 17 December 2012 — Barbin v Parliament

(Case T-228/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Death of the applicant - Non-resumption of proceedings by the successors - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 55/22

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Florence Barbin (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and E. Despotopoulou, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 15 February 2011 in Case F-68/09 Barbin v Parliament ECR I-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present appeal.

2. Each party is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/48

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2012 — H-Holding AG v Parliament

(Case T-672/11) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Action for damages - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2013/C 26/96

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: H-Holding AG (Cham, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Závodný, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: U. Rösslein and P. Schonard, Agents)

Re:

Application for a declaration that the Parliament unlawfully failed to commence infringement proceedings against the Czech Republic and to call upon OLAF to open an investigation relating to a Czech political party, following its petition of 24 August 2011, and, secondly, action for compensation for damage suffered as a result of the Parliament’s alleged failure to act.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. H-Holding AG is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 235, 4.8.2012
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/83

Order of the General Court of 13 June 2013 — AU Optronics v Commission

(Case T-94/11) (1)

2013/C 225/187

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 120, 16.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/20

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — Henkel and Henkel France v Commission

(Case T-607/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Request from the French competition authority seeking to obtain the transmission of certain documents contained in the Commission’s file relating to competition proceedings concerning the European market for consumer detergents - Use in the context of national proceedings concerning the French detergents sector - Disappearance of the legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 129/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany) and Henkel France (Boulogne Billancourt, France) (represented by: R. Polley, T. Kuhn, F. Brunet and É. Paroche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan and P. J. Van Nuffel, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: C. Vang, Agent)

Re:

Application for: (1) annulment of the decision allegedly contained in a Commission letter of 30 September 2011 (Case COMP/39.579 — Consumer detergents — and Case 09/0007 F) whereby the latter refused a request by the French competition authority to send it, for the purposes of Case 09/0007 F concerning the French detergents sector, certain documents produced in Case COMP/39.579; and (2) an order that the Commission authorise the applicants to rely on the documents in question in proceedings before the French competition authority and any other appropriate measure.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the first head of claim of the action, seeking the annulment of the decision of the European Commission allegedly contained in its letter of 30 September 2011 to the French competition authority.

2. The action is dismissed as to the remainder.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of Unilever PLC and Unilever NV.

4. The applicants, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA and Henkel France, are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Commission, including those incurred in the application for interim measures in Case T-607/11 R. The Kingdom of Denmark is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/11

Order of the General Court of 21 January 2014 — Bricmate v Council

(Case T-596/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of ceramic tiles originating in China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Absence of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 78/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bricmate AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: C. Dackö, A. Willems and S. De Knop, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, acting as Agents, assisted initially by G. Berrisch and A. Polcyn, and subsequently by A. Polcyn, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents); Cerame-Unie AISBL (Brussels, Belgium); Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Azulejos y Pavimentos Cerámicos (ASCER) (Castellón de la Plana, Spain); Confindustria Ceramica (Sassuolo, Italy); Casalgrande Padana SpA (Casalgrande, Italy); Etruria Design Srl (Modena, Italy) (represented by: V. Akritidis and Y. Melin, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 of 12 September 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2011 L 238, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. Bricmate AB shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

4. Cerame-Unie AISBL, Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Azulejos y Pavimentos Cerámicos (ASCER), Confindustria Ceramica, Casalgrande Padana SpA and Etruria Design Srl shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 344/55

Order of the General Court of 1 October 2013 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-554/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Financing by the European Union of certain projects in Tunisia, in the framework of the EuropeAid programme - Development of an integrated IT system for the Tunisian judiciary - Recovery by the Commission of debts payable to Tunisia by a third party - Debit note - Acts inseparable from the contract - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissible)

2013/C 344/98

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, M. Dermitzakis, and N. Theologou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and S. Bartelt, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to settle sums allegedly payable and requiring repayment of the sum of EUR 281 270,00 paid in the framework of the implementation of the contract EuropeAid/124378/D/SER/TN (No 2007/145-464), communicated to the applicant by letter dated 8 August 2011 (C&F/2011/D/001101), and also of debit note 3241108036, received by the applicant on 17 August 2011, and of all the Commission’s related decisions

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE, in addition to bearing its own costs, shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 370, 17.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/38

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2014 — Canon Europa v Commission

(Case T-34/11) (1)

((Action for annulment - Customs Union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff subheadings - Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those subheadings - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissible))

2014/C 409/54

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Canon Europa NV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: P. De Baere and P. Muñiz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and L. Keppenne, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul in part the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 of 5 October 2010 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2010 L 284, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene made by Konica Minolta Business Solutions Europe GmbH and Olivetti SpA.

3. Canon Europa NV shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/28

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — Inaporc v Commission

(Case T-575/11) (1)

((State aid - Actions undertaken by a national interprofessional committee for pork - Financing by voluntary levies made compulsory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 184/48

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Interprofession nationale porcine (Inaporc) (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Calvet, Y. Trifounovitch and C. Rexha, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, and subsequently by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 4376 final of 29 June 2011 concerning State aid NN 10/2010 — France — Levy intended to finance a national interprofessional committee for pork.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the present action.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Treofan Holdings and Treofan Germany v Commission

(Case T-612/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/63)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Treofan Holdings GmbH (Raunheim, Germany), Treofan Germany GmbH & Co. KG (Neunkirchen, Germany) (represented by: J de Weerth, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Treofan Holdings GmbH and Treofan Germany GmbH & Co. KG;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 383/29

Order of the General Court of 25 July 2016 — Moravia Gas Storage v Commission

(Case T-465/11 RENV) (1)

(2016/C 383/38)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 305, 15.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 227/22

Order of the General Court of 12 June 2012 — Strack v Commission

(Case T-65/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Order of referral - Decision which cannot be the object of an appeal - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

2012/C 227/37

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Guido Strack (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 7 December 2011 in Case F-44/05 RENV Strack v Commission (not published in the ECR), and seeking that that order be quashed.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Guido Strack is to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present case.

(1) OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.