ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/40

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 6 June 2016 — Matzke v Commission

(Case F-87/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/72)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 262, 10/8/2015, p. 43.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/36

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 June 2016 — FF v EASA

(Case F-6/15) (1)

(2016/C 326/62)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 21 July 2016 — Stanley v Commission

(Case F-5/16) (1)

((Civil service - Member of the contract staff - Request under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Request for reclassification of a contract - Reasonable period - None - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 364/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: John Stanley (Apia, Samoa) (represented by: O. Mader, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision not to reclassify the applicant’s contract as a temporary staff contract or, in the alternative, compensation for the material damage alleged to have been suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr John Stanley shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 145, 25/4/2016, p. 37.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/23

Order of the President of the General Court of 6 May 2014 — Frucona Košice v Commission

(Case T-103/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - Alcohol and spirits - Cancellation of a tax debt in a collective bankruptcy procedure - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of any urgency - Prima facie case not made out))

2014/C 202/29

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Frucona Košice a.s. (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: K. Lasok QC, B. Hartnett and J. Holmes, Barristers, and O. Geiss, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Walkerová and L. Armati, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2013) 6261 final of 16 October 2013 on State aid SA.18211 (C 25/2005) (ex NN 21/2005), implemented by the Slovak Republic for Frucona Košice a.s., in so far as it orders the Slovak Republic to recover the aid.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 439/27

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 October 2014 — Holistic Innovation Institute v REA

(Case T-706/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - Projects funded by the European Union in the field of research and technological development - Decision refusing participation in certain projects - Application for suspension of operation - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2014/C 439/37)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU (Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain) (represented by: R. Muñiz García, lawyer)

Defendant: Research Executive Agency (represented by: G. Gascard, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of the Research Executive Agency (REA) decision ARES (2014) 2461172 of 24 July 2014 excluding the applicant from participation in the ZONeSEC and Inachus projects.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/16

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Schmiedewerke Gröditz v Commission

(Case T-179/14 R)

((Interim measures - State aid - National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source - Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Fumus boni juris))

2014/C 329/22

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Schmiedewerke Gröditz (Gröditz, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The judgment of 7 April 2014 in Case T-179/14 R Schmidewerke Gröditz is set aside.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/19

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2014 — Léon Van Parys v Commission

(Case T-171/14) (1)

((Action for annulment - Customs union - Commission letter informing about the continuation of the suspension of the time-limit for dealing with an application for remission of customs duties - Application for a ruling - Lack of competence of the General Court - No interest in bringing proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 056/26)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Firma Léon Van Parys (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: P. Vlaemminck, B. Van Vooren and R. Verbeke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros, B.-R. Killmann and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the letter of the European Commission of 24 January 2014 informing the applicant about the continuation of the suspension of the time-limit for dealing with an application for remission of customs duties under Article 907 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1) and, secondly, application for a ruling that Article 909 of Regulation No 2454/93 had effect with regard to the applicant after the judgment of 19 March 2013 in Firma Van Parys v Commission (T-324/10, ECR, EU:T:2013:136).

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed;

2. Firma Léon Van Parys is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/24

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 September 2014 — Energiewerke Nord v Commission

(Case T-288/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - National support for the generation of renewable electricity - Commission decision to open the State aid formal investigation procedure - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case))

(2014/C 431/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Energiewerke Nord GmbH (Rubenow, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz and B. Wißmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened the State aid formal investigation procedure concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 127/27

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 February 2015 — BPC Lux 2 and Others v Commission

(Case T-812/14 R)

((Interim measures - State aid - Financial sector - Aid granted in the context of the resolution of a bank - Decision not to raise objections - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2015/C 127/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: BPC Lux 2 Sàrl (Senningerberg, Luxembourg); BPC UKI LP (George Town, Cayman Islands, United Kingdom); Bennett Offshore Restructuring Fund, Inc. (George Town); Bennett Restructuring Fund LP (Wilmington, Delaware, United States); Queen Street Fund Ltd (George Town); BTG Pactual Global Emerging Markets and Macro Master Fund LP (George Town); BTG Pactual Absolute Return II Master Fund LP (George Town); CSS LLC (Chicago, Illinois, United States); Beltway Strategic Opportunities Fund LP (George Town); EJF Debt Opportunities Master Fund LP (George Town); EJF DO Fund (Cayman) LP (George Town); TP Lux HoldCo (Luxembourg, Luxembourg); VR Global Partners LP (George Town); Absalon II Ltd (Dublin, Ireland); CenturyLink, Inc. Defined Benefit Master Trust (Denver, Colorado, United States); City of New York Group Trust (New York, New York, United States); Dignity Health (San Francisco, California, United States); GoldenTree Asset Management Lux Sàrl (Luxembourg); GoldenTree High Yield Value Fund Offshore 110 Two Ltd (Dublin); and San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Association (San Bernardino, California, United States) (represented by: J. Webber, M. Steenson, Solicitors, and P. Fajardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and P.J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the suspension of operation of Commission Decision C (2014) 5682 final of 3 August 2014 not to raise objections to State aid SA.39250 (2014/N), notified by Portugal, for the resolution of Banco Espírito Santo SA.

Operative part of the order

1) The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/31

Order of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Pfizer v Commission and EMA

(Case T-48/14) (1)

(2015/C 056/44)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/39

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — egeplast international v Commission

(Case T-291/14) (1)

(2015/C 155/50)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/40

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Fritz Winter Eisengießerei v Commission

(Case T-310/14) (1)

(2015/C 155/58)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/26

Order of the General Court of 8 May 2015 — Hoteles Catalonia v OHIM — Fundació Catalunya-La Pedrera, fundació especial (HOTEL CATALONIA LA PEDRERA)

(Case T-358/14) (1)

(2015/C 228/36)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/36

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2015 — EEB v Commission

(Case T-250/14) (1)

((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Correspondence between the Commission and two Member States regarding the implementation of a Transitional National Plan (TNP) under Directive 2010/75/EU - Implied refusal of access - No need to adjudicate - New claims - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 213/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Stothers, Solicitor, M. Van Kerckhove and C. Simphal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission of 13 February 2014 refusing access to documents from the Republic of Bulgaria and the Czech Republic.

Operative part of the order

1) There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claims of the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) for the annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission of 13 February 2014 refusing access to documents from the Republic of Bulgaria and the Czech Republic.

2) The claims for damages presented by the EEB are dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

3) The Commission is ordered to pay, in addition to its own costs, those of the EEB.

(1) OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 294/52

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Walter Hundhausen v Commission

(Case T-175/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/63)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Walter Hundhausen GmbH (Schwerte, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. Renner, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: EFTA Surveillance Authority (represented by: initially X. Lewis, M. Schneider and G. Mathisen, then X. Lewis, M. Schneider, M. Moustakali and C. Perrin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for intervention submitted by Flachglas Torgau GmbH and Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG, by Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG and Kronoply GmbH, by Bayer MaterialScience AG, by Sabic Polyolefine GmbH, by Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH, Ineos Phenol GmbH and Ineos Vinyls Deutschland GmbH, and by Advansa GmbH, Akzo Nobel Industrial Chemicals GmbH, Aurubis AG, CBW Chemie GmbH, CFB Chemische Fabrik Brunsbüttel GmbH & Co. KG, Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH, Dralon GmbH, Hahl Filaments GmbH, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Siegen, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Salzgitter, Nabaltec AG, Siltronic AG and Wacker Chemie AG.

3. Walter Hundhausen GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 245/20

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Energiewerke Nord v Commission

(Case T-288/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 245/24)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Energiewerke Nord GmbH (Rubenow, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, M. Ringel, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C(2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. Energiewerke Nord GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 294/62

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — P-D Glasseiden and Others v Commission

(Case T-272/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/75)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: P-D Glasseiden GmbH Oschatz (Oschatz, Germany); P-D Interglas Technologies GmbH (Erbach, Germany); P-D Industriegesellschaft mbH (Wilsdruff, Germany); and Glashütte Freital GmbH (Freital, Germany) (represented by: H. Janssen and G.-R. Engel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. P-D Glasseiden GmbH Oschatz, P-D Interglas Technologies GmbH, P-D Industriegesellschaft mbH and Glashütte Freital GmbH shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 294/66

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Bayer MaterialScience v Commission

(Case T-282/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/80)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Bayer MaterialScience AG (Leverkusen, Germany) (represented by: C. Arhold, L. Petersen, F.-A. Wesche, N. Wimmer and T. Woltering, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. Bayer MaterialScience AG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/36

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2015 — EEB v Commission

(Case T-685/14) (1)

((Environment - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Commission decision concerning the notification by Bulgaria of a transitional national plan as referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions - Refusal of internal review - Measure of individual scope - Aarhus Convention - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Lateness - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any foundation in law))

(2015/C 381/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Podskalská, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin, S. Petrova and G. Wilms, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2002 final of 31 March 2014 on the notification by the Republic of Bulgaria of a transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU, on industrial emissions, and, secondly, for annulment of the Commission Decision of 11 July 2014 (Ares (2014) 2317513) declaring inadmissible the applicant’s request that the Commission review its decision of 31 March 2014.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

3. European Environmental Bureau (EEB) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. EEB, the Commission, the Parliament and the Council shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 311/61

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2015 — Aalto-korkeakoulusäätiö v OHIM (APPCAMPUS)

(Case T-255/14) (1)

(2015/C 311/69)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/35

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-676/14) (1)

((Action for annulment - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1173/2011 - Effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area - Manipulation of statistics - Commission decision to initiate an investigation - Act not amenable to review - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 381/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, Abogado del Estado)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne, J. Baquero Cruz and M. Clausen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 4856 final of 11 July 2014 on launching of an investigation related to the manipulation of statistics in Spain as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1173/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The Kingdom of Spain shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/40

Order of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-849/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - EIB staff - Annual assessment - Internal rules - Appeals procedure - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2015/C 381/47)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: G. Nuvoli and E. Raimond, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 18 November 2014 in De Nicola v EIB (F-59/09 RENV, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:248), and seeking that that judgment be set aside.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal.

2. Orders Mr Carlo De Nicola to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.