ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 79/2

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 January 2013 — Annunziata Del Prete v Giorgio Armani SpA, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-261/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Reputation - Figurative sign ‘AJ AMICI JUNIOR’ - Opposition by the holder of the earlier national figurative mark AJ ARMANI JEANS and of the earlier national word mark ARMANI JUNIOR)

2013/C 79/03

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Annunziata Del Prete (represented by: R. Bocchini, avvocato)

Other parties to the proceedings: Giorgio Armani SpA (represented by: M. Rapisardi, avvocato), Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock and F. Mattina, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 March 2012 in Case T-420/10 Armani v OHIM, by which the General Court annulled the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 July 2010 concerning opposition proceedings between Giorgio Armani SpA and Annunziata Del Prete (Case R 1360/2009-2) — Likelihood of confusion — Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed;

2. Annunziata Del Prete shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/19

Order of the President of the Court of 5 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Spain) — Miguel Fradera Torredemer, Maria Teresa Torredemer Marcet, Enrique Fradera Ohlsen, Alicia Fradera Torredemer v Corporación Uniland S.A.

(Case C-364/12) (1)

2013/C 108/51

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 303, 6.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/6

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Tivoli — Italy) — Claudio Loreti, Maria Vallerotonda, Attilio Vallerotonda, Virginia Chellini v Comune di Zagarolo

(Case C-555/12) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Implementation of European Union law - None - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2013/C 129/11

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Tivoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Claudio Loreti, Maria Vallerotonda, Attilio Vallerotonda, Virginia Chellini

Defendant: Comune di Zagarolo

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Tivoli — Interpretation of Article 47(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, read in conjunction with Article 6 TEU and Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — National legislation providing for a division of jurisdiction as between civil and administrative courts based on the distinction between individual rights and legitimate interests — Those concepts not clearly distinguished

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Tivoli (Italy).

(1) OJ C 32, 2.2.2013
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/47

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 — Asa sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-354/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Relative ground for refusal - Word mark FEMIFERAL - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier word and figurative mark feminatal)

2013/C 225/82

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Appellant: Asa sp. z o.o. (represented by: M. Chimiak, adwokat)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 May 2012 in Case T-110/11 Asa v OHIM — Merck (FEMIFERAL), by which the General Court dismissed as unfounded the action brought by Asa sp. z o.o., applicant for the word mark ‘FEMIFERAL’, seeking the annulment of Decision R 0182/2010-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM), of 19 November 2010, annulling the decision of the Opposition Division, which rejected the opposition brought by the proprietor of the national word mark ‘Feminatal’ and of the national figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘feminatal’ for goods classified in Class 5 — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Asa sp. z o.o. is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/50

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2013 — Transports Schiocchet — Excursions SARL v Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-397/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Appeal manifestly unfounded and manifestly inadmissible - No failure to state reasons - Imprecise ground of appeal - Ground of appeal seeking reconsideration of the application at first instance)

2013/C 225/88

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Transports Schiocchet — Excursions SARL (represented by: E Deshoulières, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Karlsson and E. Dumitriu-Segnana, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: N. Yerrell and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 June 2012 in Case T-203/11 Schiocchet v Council and Commission, by which the General Court rejected as manifestly unfounded in law an application for compensation of a loss allegedly suffered due to the application of the system laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 684/92 of 16 March 1992 on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus (OJ 1992 L 74, p. 1) — Conditions on which an action for compensation may be brought — Wrongful act of an institution

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Transports Schiocchet — Excursions SARL shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/57

Order of the President of the Court of 25 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — Fernando Casimiro dos Santos Ferreira, Maria do Carmo Ferreira dos Santos, Rosa Fernanda Santos Ferreira v Companhia de Seguros Allianz Portugal S.A.

(Case C-213/12) (1)

2013/C 225/113

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 377/3

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater v European Commission

(Case C-615/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for damages - Grants made for projects financed by the ‘Culture 2000’ programme - Claims for payment of various sums - Content of the application - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2013/C 377/05

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater (represented by: H. Karl, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and D. Roussanov, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 25 October 2012 in Case T-161/06 Arbos v Commission by which the General Court dismissed the action against the Commission, seeking payment of, first, the sum of EUR 38 585,42 together with interest at the rate of 12 % from 1 January 2001 and the sum of EUR 27 618,91 together with interest at the rate of 12 % from 1 March 2003 and, second, of the sum of EUR 26 459,38 excluding VAT in respect of the fees of lawyers instructed during the pre-litigation procedure — Infringement of Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater, is to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/43

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Sheilesh Shah, Akhil Shah v Three-N-Products Private Ltd, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-14/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Application for registration of the Community word mark AYUURI NATURAL - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier Community word and figurative marks AYUR - Appeal manifestly inadmissible and manifestly unfounded)

2013/C 225/73

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Sheilesh Shah, Akhil Shah (represented by: M. Chapple, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings: Three-N-Products Private Ltd (represented by: C. Jäger, Rechtsanwältin), Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2011 in Case T-313/10 THREE-N-PRODUCTS PRIVATE v OHIM — SHAH (AYUURI NATURAL), by which that Court annulled the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 1 June 2010 in Case R 1005/2009-4 annulling the Opposition Division’s decision rejecting the application for registration of the word mark ‘AYUURI NATURAL’ for goods in Classes 3 and 5 in the opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the Community figurative and word marks including the word element ‘AYUR’ in respect of goods in Classes 3 and 5 — Interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Sheilesh Shah and Mr Akhil Shah shall pay the costs.

3. The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/16

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság and the Fővárosi Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary)) — Dutka József (C-614/12) and Csilla Sajtos (C-10/13) v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (C-614/12) and Budapest Főváros VI. Ker. Önkormányzata (C-10/13)

(Joined Cases C-614/12 and C-10/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Implementation of European Union law - Absence - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 112/19

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring courts

Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság and Fővárosi Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Dutka József (C-614/12) and Csilla Sajtos (C-10/13)

Defendants: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (C-614/12) and Budapest Főváros VI. Ker. Önkormányzata (C-10/13)

Re:

Requests for a preliminary ruling — Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság and Fővárosi Munkaügyi Bíróság — Interpretation of Article 6 TEU and Articles 30 and 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Protection of workers in the event of unjustified dismissal — Dismissal without reasons being given — Official of a public administrative body who has been dismissed on the basis of a provision of national legislation governing the terms and conditions of civil servants.

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary), by decision of 6 December 2012, and by the Fővárosi Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary), by decision of 21 September 2012.

(1) OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/28

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2013 — European Commission v Hungary

(Case C-462/12) (1)

2014/C 102/38

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/45

Order of the President of the Court of 5 June 2014 — El Corte Inglés, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Emilio Pucci International BV

(Case C-584/12 P) (1)

2014/C 315/73

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/22

Order of the President of the Court of 19 February 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-500/12) (1)

2014/C 184/30

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/59

Order of the President of the Court of 28 May 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Markus Weiss v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-68/13) (1)

2013/C 225/131

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/30

Order of the President of the Court of 11 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Pontevedra — Spain) — Pablo Acosta Padín v Hijos de J. Barreras SA

(Case C-276/13) (1)

2014/C 102/47

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 304/8

Order of the President of the Court of 15 July 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgique) — Guy Kleynen v Conseil des ministres

(Case C-99/13) (1)

2013/C 304/16

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/18

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 17 de Barcelona — Spain) — France Telecom España, SA v Organismo de Gestión Tributaria de la Diputación de Barcelona

(Case C-25/13) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive 2002/20/EC - Fee for the private use or the special right of use for the area under and on local public land imposed on operators supplying electronic communications services - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Answer able clearly to be deduced from the case-law))

2014/C 112/21

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 17 de Barcelona — Spain

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: France Telecom Espana, SA

Defendant: Organismo de Gestión Tributaria de la Diputación de Barcelona

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Juzgado de lo Contencioso Administrativo de Barcelona — Interpretation of Article 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (‘the Authorisation Directive’) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21) — Fees for rights to use and to install facilities — Municipal public land — Transfer of rights and transfer of management of use.

Operative part of the order

European Union law must be interpreted, in the light of the judgment in Joined Cases C-55/11, C-57/11 and C-58/11 Vodafone España and France Telecom España [2012] ECR, as precluding the application of a fee for the use and operation of resources installed on or under public or private property, within the meaning of Article 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (the Authorisation Directive), to operators supplying electronic communications services which are not the owners of those resources.

(1) OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/29

Order of the President of the Court of 18 December 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Finland, intervention: Kingdom of Sweden, Czech Republic, Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Poland, Kingdom of the Netherlands, French Republic, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Republic of Estonia

(Case C-109/13) (1)

2014/C 102/41

Language of the case: Finnish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/4

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Spain) — Bright Service SA v Repsol Comercial de Produtos Petrolíferos SA

(Case C-142/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 81 EC - Exclusive purchasing agreement - Exemption - Regulation (EEC) No 1984/83 - Agreement to which the exemption applies - Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 - Agreement to which the exemption does not apply - Temporal effects of the exemption))

2014/C 184/05

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Spain

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bright Service SA

Defendant: Repsol Comercial de Produtos Petrolíferos SA

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1984/83 of 22 June 1983 on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to categories of exclusive purchasing agreements (OJ 1983 L 173, p. 5) and Article 3(1) and (5)(a) and Article 12(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 of 22 December 1999 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (OJ 1999 L 336, p. 21) — Temporal effects — Exclusive distribution agreement for motor-vehicle fuels and other fuels between a supplier and a service station operator — Agreement concluded under Regulation No 1984/83 having effect after the entry into force of Regulation No 2790/1999 — Agreement which does not satisfy the requirements of those two regulations

Operative part of the order

Article 12(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 of 22 December 1999 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices must be interpreted as meaning that a contract — containing a non-compete clause — which was already in force on 31 May 2000 and which satisfies the conditions laid down in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1984/83 of 22 June 1983 on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to categories of exclusive purchasing agreements, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1582/97 of 30 July 1997, but which does not satisfy the conditions of Regulation No 2790/1999, is excepted, under Article 12(2), from the scope of Article 81(1) EC only until 31 December 2001.

(1) OJ C 178, 22. 6. 2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/19

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 January 2014 — Simone Gbagbo v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Republic of Côte d'Ivoire

(Case C-397/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Time-limit - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 175/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Simone Gbagbo (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Chavrier, Agents, European Commission, Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (represented by: J.-P. Mignard, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 April 2013, in Case T-119/11 Gbagbo v Council in which the General Court dismissed the action seeking an annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36) and, secondly, of Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), in so far as they relate to the appellant — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Simone Gbagbo is ordered to bear, in addition to her own costs, those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The Republic of Côte d'Ivoire shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 274, 21.09.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/17

Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, interveners: Kingdom of Belgium and Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-8/13) (1)

2014/C 261/25

Language of the case: Slovenian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/23

Order of the President of the Tenth Chamber of the Court of 10 February 2014 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-96/13) (1)

2014/C 184/36

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/9

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2014 — Delphi Technologies, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-448/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b) - Word mark INNOVATION FOR THE REAL WORLD - Advertising slogan - Refusal of registration - No distinctive character))

2014/C 261/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Delphi Technologies, Inc. (represented by: C. Albrecht and J. Heumann, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order

1) The appeal is dismissed.

2) Delphi Technologies, Inc. shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/18

Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 21 May 2014 — Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Impexmetal S.A.

(Case C-292/13 P) (1)

2014/C 261/31

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/46

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 5 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Vietnam Airlines Co. Ltd v Brigitta Voss, Klaus-Jürgen Voss

(Case C-431/13) (1)

2014/C 315/76

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.