ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 — SFIE-PE v Parliament

(Case T-401/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Interpreters’ strike - Measures requisitioning interpreters adopted by the European Parliament - Measure not open to challenge - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 139/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et européens — Section du Parlement européen (SFIE-PE) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 263 and 268 TFEU seeking, first, the annulment of the decision of 2 July 2018 of the Director General of Personnel of the Parliament requisitioning interpreters and conference interpreters for 3 July 2018 and the subsequent decisions of the Director General of Personnel of the Parliament requisitioning interpreters and conference interpreters for 4, 5,10 and 11 July 2018 and, second, an order that the Parliament make good the non-pecuniary harm caused by those decisions assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 10 000.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union.

3. The Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et européens — Section du Parlement européen (SFIE-PE) shall pay the costs, including the costs of the interim proceedings, with the exception of those related to the application for leave to intervene made by the Council.

4. The SFPI-PE, the European Parliament and the Council shall each bear their own costs of the application for leave to intervene made by the Council.

(1) OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — VJ v EEAS

(Case T-180/18) (1)

(2019/C 103/78)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 April 2019 — Bruel v Commission

(Case T-202/18) (1)

(2019/C 206/87)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2019 — Haba Trading v EUIPO — Vida (vidaXL)

(Case T-503/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 164/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Haba Trading BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Schneiders and A. Brittner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Vida AB (Alvesta, Sweden)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2018 (Case R 190/2016-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Vida AB and Haba Trading BV.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Haba Trading BV is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2019 — Martini-Sportswear v EUIPO — Olympique de Marseille (M)

(Case T-237/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark M - Withdrawal of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 230/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Martini-Sportswear GmbH (Annaberg, Austria) (represented by: W. Lang, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Olympique de Marseille SASP (Marseille, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2018 (Case R 1755/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Olympique de Marseille and Martini-Sportswear.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Martini-Sportswear GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 221, 25.6.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — YR v Commission

(Case T-571/18) (1)

(2019/C 213/83)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Scaloni and Figini v Commission

(Case T-158/18) (1)

(Action for damages - Resolution of credit institutions and investment firms - Directive 2014/59/EU and Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - State Aid - Disregard of the procedural requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 328/59)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Mario Scaloni (Ancona, Italy) and Ennio Figini (Chiaravalle, Italy) (represented by: P. Putti, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia, A. Steiblytė and K.-P. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and M. Sammut, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Rebasti and J. Bauerschmidt, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for material loss alleged to have been suffered as a result of the Commission’s refusal to allow the Italian state to establish a state aid in favour of the Banca delle Marche.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mario Scaloni and Ennio Figini shall bear their own costs and the costs incurred by the Commission.

3. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 May 2019 — Apple v EUIPO — Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT)

(Case T-685/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 246/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States) (represented by: J. Olsen and P. Andreottola, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication SCRL (La Hulpe, Belgium) (represented by: G. Glas, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 August 2018 (Case R 476/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication SCRL and Apple Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Apple Inc. and Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication SCRL shall each bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — YP v Commission

(Case T-563/18) (1)

(2019/C 423/87)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-306/18) (1)

(2019/C 399/124)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.
Order of the General Court of 6 February 2020 — FT v ESMA

(Case T-625/18) (1)

(Civil service - Withdrawal of debit note issued by ESMA - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 137/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: FT (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Securities and Markets Authority (represented by: G. Filippa and F. Barzanti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of ESMA’s letter of 9 August 2018, which was notified to the applicant on 10 August 2018 and by which the ESMA requested reimbursement of EUR 12 000 in relation to costs in the case that gave rise to the judgment of 8 October 2015, FT v ESMA (F-39/14, EU:F:2015:117), and, secondly, of debit note No 4440180170, which was issued by ESMA on 10 August 2018, seeking the reimbursement of that sum.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — O'Flynn and Others v Commission

(Case T-270/18) (1)

(2020/C 61/78)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — JV Voscf and Others v Council and Others

(Case T-197/18) (1)

(2021/C 252/59)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — DEI v Commission

(Case T-694/18) (1)

(2020/C 433/85)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 35, 28.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Deichmann-Shoes UK v Commission

(Case T-141/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/54)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Order of the General Court of 21 July 2022 — Fersher Developments and Lisin v Commission and ECB

(Case T-200/18) (1)

(Action for damages - Economic and monetary policy - Stability support programme for Cyprus - Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Equal treatment - Principle of proportionality - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 359/88)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Fersher Developments LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus), Vladimir Lisin (Lipetsk, Russia) (represented by: R. Nowinski, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, T. Materne and S. Delaude, acting as Agents), European Central Bank (represented by: O. Heinz, P. Papapaschalis, G. Várhelyi and M. Szablewska, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Re:

By their action under Article 268 TFEU, the applicants seek compensation for the damage they claim to have suffered as a result of the decision of the Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) to make the grant of a financial assistance facility to the Republic of Cyprus subject to certain conditions.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Fersher Developments LTD and Mr Vladimir Lisin shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 211, 18.6.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 August 2019 — BASF v Commission

(Case T-472/19 R R)

(Interim measures - Medicinal product - Marketing authorisation - Omega-3 acid ethyl esters - No urgency)

(2019/C 383/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BASF AS (Oslo, Norway) (represented by: E. Wright, A. Rusanov and H. Boland, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek and A. Sipos, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures to suspend the operation of the Commission Implementing Decision of 6 June 2019 concerning, in the framework of Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC, the marketing authorisations of medicinal products for human use containing ‘Omega-3 acid ethyl esters’ for oral use in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction (C(2019) 4336 final).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Highgate Capital Management v Commission

(Case T-280/19 R)

(Interim relief - State aid - Application for interim measures - No need to adopt the interim measures requested - Lack of jurisdiction - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 328/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Highgate Capital Management LLP (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Struys and I. Van Damme, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck, A. Bouchagiar and K.-P. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for, first, suspension of the operation of a Commission decision rejecting a complaint relating to allegedly unlawful State aid granted to Eurobank Ergasias SA through the sale of Piraeus Bank Bulgaria (SA.53105) and, secondly, the grant of other interim measures.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the President of the General Court of 13 September 2019 — Intering and Others v Commission

(Case T-525/19 R)

(Interim measures - Procedure for the award of a contract - Application for suspension of operation - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

(2019/C 423/74)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Intering Sh.p.k (Republic of Kosovo), Steinmüller Engineering GmbH (Gummersbach, Germany), Deling d.o.o. za proizvodnju, promet i usluge (Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina), ZM-Vikom d.o.o. za proizvodnju, konstruckcije i montažu (Šibenik, Croatia) (represented by: R. Spielhofen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu, J. Estrada de Solà and B. Bertelmann, Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of operation of the decision of the European Commission, communicated by letter of 30 July 2019 (AresD[2019] Na/vk), not to allow the applicants to submit a detailed offer in the procedure for the award of the contract EuropeAid/140043/DH/WKS/XK and the temporary suspension of the procedure for the award of the contract.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the application for interim measures;
Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Othman v Council

(Case T-58/19) (1)

(Action for compensation - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Lack of competence)

(2019/C 399/80)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Razan Othman (Damascus, Syria) (represented by E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by A. Jaume and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the adoption of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16) and its subsequent implementing acts, and as a result of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 of 17 May 2019 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2019 L 132, p. 36), in so far as those decisions concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Razan Othman shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 December 2019 — ZU v EEAS

(Case T-154/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Mission expenses - Act not open to challenge - Act not adversely affecting an official - Irregular nature of the pre-litigation procedure - Premature action - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 61/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the part of the decision of 30 November 2018 by which the EEAS Appointing Authority rejected the applicant’s complaint of 27 July 2018, inasmuch as it implicitly refused the request concerning mission expenses submitted by the applicant on 26 February 2018.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. ZU shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Sipcam Oxon v Commission

(Case T-518/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - Plant protection products - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Active substance chlorothalonil - Conditions of approval for placing on the market - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency)

(2020/C 19/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sipcam Oxon SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Mereu and P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Naglis and A. Dawes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/677 of 29 April 2019 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance chlorothalonil, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2019 L 114, p. 15).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 February 2020 — Fleximed v EUIPO — docPrice (Fleximed)

(Case T-214/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Fleximed - Earlier EU word mark mediFLEX - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 114/08)

Language of the proceedings: German

Parties

Applicant: Fleximed AG (Triesen, Liechtenstein) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: docPrice GmbH (Koblenz, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2019 (case R 1121/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between docPrice and Fleximed.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Fleximed AG is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Clem & Jo Optique v EUIPO — C&A (C&J)

(Case T-125/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 77/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Clem & Jo Optique SARL (Cormicy, France) (represented by: N. Hausmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervener before the General Court: C&A AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Aznar Alonso, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2018 (Case R 1252/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between C&A and Clem & Jo Optique.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Clem & Jo Optique SARL shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. C&A AG shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.
Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — Gerber v Parliament and Council

(Case T-326/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Customs territory of the European Union - Regulation (EU) 2019/474 - Directive (EU) 2019/475 - Inclusion of the municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano - Not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 191/20)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Tibor Gerber (Campione d’Italia, Italy) (represented by: N. Amadei, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and C. Biz, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Lo Monaco and E. Ambrosini, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Regulation (EU) 2019/474 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ 2019 L 83, p. 38), in so far as concerns the part relating to the inclusion of the Italian municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the customs territory of the Union; second, application under Article 264 TFEU seeking a declaration that Council Directive (EU) 2019/475 of 18 February 2019 amending Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC as regards the inclusion of the Italian municipality of Campione d'Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the customs territory of the Union and in the territorial application of Directive 2008/118/EC (OJ 2019 L 83, p. 42) has no effect; and, third, application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures suspending the application of Regulation 2019/474, Directive 2019/475 and of any other implementing measure relating thereto.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene made by the European Commission and the Italian Republic.

3. Mr Tibor Gerber shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interim proceedings.

4. The Commission and the Italian Republic shall bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.