ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 380/13

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Kėdainių rajono Okainių and Others v Council and Commission

(Case T-386/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common Agricultural Policy - Direct support schemes for farmers - Authorisation for granting complementary national direct payments in Lithuania for 2012 - Time limit for bringing an action - Point from which time runs - Inadmissibility - Plea of illegality))

2014/C 380/17

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties

Applicant: Kėdainių rajono Okainių ŽŪB (Okainiai, Lithuania) and the 134 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the order (represented by: I. Vėgėlė, lawyer)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Vaičiukaitė and E. Karlsson, acting as Agents); and European Commission (represented by: H. Kranenborg and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas, K. Vainienė, A. Karbauskas, R. Makelis and K. Anužis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application seeking, first, the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2012) 4391 final of 2 July 2012 authorising the making of complementary national direct payments in Lithuania for 2012 and, secondly, a declaration of the partial illegality of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ 2009 L 30, p. 16).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Kėdainių rajono Okainių ŽŪB and the 134 other applicants appearing in the annex shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.

3. The Republic of Lithuania shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/26

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — ASPA v OHIM — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (ARGENTARIA)

(Case T-502/13) (1)

2014/C 329/41

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.
Order of the General Court of 6 November 2014 — ANKO v Commission

(Case T-64/13) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Sixth Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) - Contract concerning the Doc@Hand project - Repayment of the sums advanced - Letter giving notice of the issue of a debit note - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2015/C 016/59)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and A. Cordewener, acting as Agents, assisted by S. Drakakakis, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought under Article 272 TFEU, seeking a declaration by the General Court first, that the applicant is not obliged to repay the whole sum paid to it by the Commission in relation to the Doc@Hand project, concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006), secondly, that the applicant is not required to pay flat-rate compensation in relation to that project and, thirdly, that the Commission is not entitled to set off the sums it owes the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 421/43

Order of the General Court of 30 September 2014 — Bitiqi and Others v Commission and Others

(Case T-410/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - ‘Rule of law’ mission conducted by the European Union in Kosovo (Eurlex Kosovo) - Decisions of the head of the mission not to renew the employment contracts - Manifest lack of jurisdiction))

2014/C 421/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Burim Bitiqi (London, United Kingdom); Arlinda Gjebrea (Pristina, Kosovo); Anna Gorska (Warsaw, Poland); Agim Hajdini (London); Josefa Martínez Estéve (Valencia, Spain); Denis Vasile Miron (Bucharest, Romania); James Nicholls (Swindon, United Kingdom); Zornitsa Popova Glodzhani (Varna, Bulgaria); Andrei Mihai Popovici (Bucharest); and Amaia San José Ortiz (Llodio, Spain) (represented: initially by A. Coolen, D. de Abreu Caldas, É. Marchal and J. N. Louis, then by D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J. N. Louis, avocats)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and A. C. Simon, acting as Agents); European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt, É. Chaboureau and M. Silva, acting as Agents); AND Eulex Kosovo (represented by: B. Borchardt, acting as Agent, and by A. Fouquet Dörte, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decisions of the head of the mission ‘Rule of law’ conducted by the European Union in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) of 27 May and 2 July 2013 not to renew the applicants’ employment contracts.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Burim Bitiqi, Arlinda Gjebrea, Anna Gorska, Agim Hajdini, Josefa Martínez Estéve, Denis Vasile Miron, James Nicholls, Zornitsa Popova Glodzhani, Andrei Mihai Popovici, Amaia San José Ortiz are ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo.

3. The Council of the European Union is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/31

Order of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-442/13) (1)

(2015/C 056/43)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/33

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2014 — DelSolar (Wujiang) v Commission

(Case T-320/13) (1)

((Dumping - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating from China - Provisional anti-dumping duty - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 026/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DelSolar (Wujiang) Ltd (Wujiang City, China) (represented by: initially L. Catrain González, lawyer, E. Wright and H. Zhu, Barristers, then L. Catrain González and E. Wright)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 of 4 June 2013 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China and amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2013 making these imports originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China subject to registration (OJ 2013 L 152, p. 5)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 198/38

Order of the General Court of 21 April 2015 — Real Express v OHIM — MIP Metro (real)

(Case T-580/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark real - Earlier national figurative marks Real and Real mark - Rejection of the opposition - Rule 19(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Rule 20(1) of Regulation No 2868/95))

(2015/C 198/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Real Express Srl (Romania) (represented by: C. Anitoae, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Rajh and J. Crespo Carrillo, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 September 2013 (Case R 1519/2012-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Real Express SRL and MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Real Express SRL is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 96/20

Order of the General Court of 26 January 2015 — Dosen v OHIM — Gramm (Nano-Pad)

(Case T-396/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 096/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Franko Dosen (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H. Losert, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially A. Pohlmann and subsequently M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Thomas Gramm (Wesel, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 May 2013 (Case R 1981/2011-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Thomas Gramm and Franko Dosen.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/57

Order of the General Court of 28 August 2015 — Bimbo v OHIM — Kimbo (Caffé KIMBO Espresso Napoletano)

(Case T-569/13) (1)

(2015/C 381/68)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
Case T-51/13: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EIB

Order of the General Court of 29 June 2015 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EIB

(Case T-51/13) ( 1 )

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 283/55

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2017 — Meta Group v Commission

(Case T-696/13) (1)

(2017/C 283/87)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/54

Order of the General Court of 2 March 2016 — SACBO v INEA

(Case T-692/13) (1)

(2016/C 156/73)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/21

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 May 2015 — Kaddour v Council

(Case T-155/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds and restriction on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 221/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Khaled Kaddour (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: A. Boesch, D. Amaudruz and M. Ponsard, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the measures imposed on the applicant under Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 2), and of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/117 of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015 L 20, p. 85).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/60

Order of the General Court of 20 November 2015 — Zitro IP v OHIM (WORLD OF BINGO)

(Case T-203/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark WORLD OF BINGO - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 038/80)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 February 2015 (Case R 1900/2014-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign WORLD OF BINGO as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Zitro IP Sàrl shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/43

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — Consorzio Vivaisti viticoli pugliesi and Negro v Commission

(Case T-436/15 R)

((Interim measures - Agriculture - Protective measures against pests of plants - Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the European Union of Xylella fastidiosa - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 381/52)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Consorzio Vivaisti viticoli pugliesi (Otrante, Italy) and Negro Daniele (Otrante) (represented by: V. Pellegrino and A. Micolani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 of 18 May 2015 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) (OJ 2015 L 125, p. 36) in so far as that decision encompasses grapevine varieties grown in the province of Lecce.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 106/35

Order of the General Court of 26 January 2016 — Permapore v OHIM — José Joaquim Oliveira II — Jardins & Afins (Terraway)

(Case T-277/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Terraway - Earlier national and international word marks TERRAWAY - Partial rejection of the opposition - Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed - Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed - Action manifestly lacking any basis in law))

(2016/C 106/40)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Permapore Ltd (Nenagh, Ireland) (represented by: J. Sales, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: José Joaquim Oliveira II — Jardins & Afins Lda (Grijó, Portugal) (represented by: M. Oehen Mendes, R. Duarte Morais, M. Ribeiro da Fonseca and S. Luís Dias, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2015 (Case R 2496/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between José Joaquim Oliveira II — Jardins & Afins Lda and Permapore Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Permapore Ltd is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (OHIM).

3. José Joaquim Oliveira II — Jardins & Afins Lda is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 59/19

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 December 2015 — Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA

(Case T-543/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - REACH - Making available on the market and use of biocidal products - Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

(2016/C 059/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann GmbH (Berlin, Germany); Ecolab Deutschland GmbH (Monheim am Rhein, Germany); Schülke & Mayr GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany); and Diversey Europe Operations BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, M. Grunchard, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Advocate)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: C. Buchanan and W. Broere, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of ECHA of 17 June 2015 to include company O. as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ 2012 L 167, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 191/46

Order of the General Court of 5 April 2016 — Petro Suisse Intertrade v Council

(Case T-525/15) (1)

(2016/C 191/64)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/44

Order of the General Court of 11 March 2016 — Binca Seafoods v Commission

(Case T-94/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1358/2014 - No prorogation of the transitory measure concerning aquaculture animals laid down in Article 95(11) of Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 - Lack of locus standi - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 156/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Binca Seafoods GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H. Schmidt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Walkerová, H. Kranenborg and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1358/2014 of 18 December 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the origin of organic aquaculture animals, aquaculture husbandry practices, feed for organic aquaculture animals and products and substances allowed for use in organic aquaculture (OJ 2014 L 365, p. 97).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Binca Seafoods GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2016 — Lions Gate Entertainment v EUIPO (DIRTY DANCING)

(Case T-179/15) (1)

(2016/C 222/45)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 200/21

Order of the General Court of 15 April 2016 — Impresa Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro v Commission

(Case T-320/15) (1)

((Public procurement - Withdrawal of the contested act - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 200/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Impresa Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro SpA (Vicenza, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, C. Santacroce and C. Toniolo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and F. Dintilhac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 7 April 2015 of the Director General of the European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC.B6/RL/Ares(2015)) excluding the applicant from participation in all procedures for the award of contracts and grants financed by the general budget of the European Union for a period of two years and 10 months.

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 314/35

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2016 — Golparvar v Council

(Case T-176/15) (1)

(2016/C 314/49)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 221, 6.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/27

Order of the General Court of 7 June 2016 — Beele Engineering v EUIPO (WE CARE)

(Case T-220/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark WE CARE - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 279/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Beele Engineering BV (Aalten, the Netherlands) (represented by: M. Ring, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 January 2015 (Case R 1424/2014-5), relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign WE CARE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Beele Engineering BV shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/20

Order of the General Court of 22 September 2016 — Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft and Others v Commission

(Case T-750/15) (1)

((Actions for annulment - State aid - Renewable energy - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German Law concerning renewable energy sources (EEG 2014) - Aid supporting electricity from renewable sources and reduced EEG surcharge for energy-intensive users - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 410/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH (Zeitz, Germany), RWE Power AG (Essen, Germany) and Vattenfall Europe Mining AG (Cottbus, Germany) (represented by: U. Karpenstein, K. Dingemann and M. Kottmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Hermann and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 5081 final of 23 July 2014 concerning State aid scheme SA. 38632 (2014/N) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany (EEG 2014 — Reform of the Renewable Energy Law).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH, RWE Power AG and Vattenfall Europe Mining AG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 410/35

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2016 — Cham et Bena Properties v Council

(Case T-708/15) (1)

(2016/C 410/61)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.