ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/19

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2014 — Justice & Environment v Commission

(Case T-405/10) (1)

((Approximation of laws - Deliberate release into the environment of GMOs - Marketing authorisation procedure - Request for internal review - Annulment of the contested decisions or the decisions concerned - Action devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2014/C 431/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Association/Vereniging Justice & Environment (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Černý, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by P. Olivier and D. Bianchi, and subsequently by D. Bianchi)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/135/EU of 2 March 2010 concerning the placing on the market, in accordance with Directive 200l/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a potato product (Solanum tuberosum L. line EH92-527-1) genetically modified for enhanced content of the amylopectin component of starch (OJ 2010 L 53, p. 11) and of Commission Decision 2010/136/EU of 2 March 2010 authorising the placing on the market of feed produced from the genetically modified potato EH92-527-1 (BPS-25271-9) and the adventitious or technically unavoidable presence of the potato in food and other feed products under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2010 L 53, p. 15), and of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 6 July 2010 rejecting the request for an internal review of those decisions.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Association/Vereniging Justice & Environment.

(1) OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/22

Order of the President of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — Trabelsi and Others v Council

(Case T-187/11 R)

(Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia - Freezing of funds - Application for suspension of operation and for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 282/46

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Mohamed Trabelsi (Paris, France); Ines Lejri (Paris); Moncef Trabelsi (Paris); Selima Trabelsi (Paris); and Tarek Trabelsi (Paris) (represented initially by A. Metzker, and subsequently by A. Tekari, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and G. Étienne, Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures and for suspension of operation of Council Implementing Decision 2011/79/CFSP of 4 February 2011 implementing Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2011 L 31, p. 40).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 186/26

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 May 2011 — Cahier and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission

(Case T-195/11 R)

(Interim proceedings - Non-contractual liability - Application for interim measures - Inadmissible in part - Want of urgency)

2011/C 186/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Cahier and Others (Montchaude, France) (represented by: C.-E. Gudin, lawyer)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by E. Sitbon Bercain and P. Mahnič Bruni, Agents) and European Commission (represented by D. Bianchi, B. Schima and M. Vollkommer, Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures and suspension of operation of Article 28 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (OJ 1999 L 179, p. 1), as maintained in force by Article 128(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 of 29 April 2008 on the common organisation of the market in wine, amending Regulations (EC) No 1493/1999, (EC) No 1782/2003, (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 3/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2392/86 and (EC) No 1493/1999.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/34

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 September 2011 — Elti v Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro

(Case T-395/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public procurement - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tender - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Disregard of the formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 347/62

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Elti d.o.o. (Gornja Radgona, Slovenia) (represented by: N. Zidar Klemenčič, lawyer)

Defendant: Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro (represented by: initially N. Bertolini, agent, then J. Stuyck and A. M. Vandromme, lawyers)

Re:

APPLICATION for the suspension of operation of the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro of 21 March 2011 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the public procurement procedure EuropeAid/129435/C/SUP/ME-NP and containing the information that that contract had been awarded to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 340/23

Order of the General Court of 23 September 2011 — Ahoua-N’Guetta and Others v Council

(Case T-193/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in the light of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire - Actions for annulment - Inaction by the applicant - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 340/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Timothée Ahoua-N’Guetta (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire), Jacques André Monoko Daligou (Abidjan), Bruno Walé Ekpo (Abidjan), Félix Tano Kouakou (Abidjan), Hortense Sess (Abidjan) and Joséphine Suzanne Ebah (Abidjan) (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Chavrier, Agents)

Re:

Partial annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36), and, second, of Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), in so far as they concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Timothée Ahoua-N’Guetta, Jacques André Monoko Daligou, Bruno Walé Ekpo, Félix Tano Kouakou, Hortense Sess and Joséphine Suzanne Ebah are ordered to pay the costs.

3. There is no need to rule on the applications made by the European Commission and the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 49/24

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Gooré v Council

(Case T-285/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Withdrawal of the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Action manifestly unfounded)

2012/C 49/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Charles Kader Gooré (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) (represented by: F. Meynot, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, G. Étienne and M. Chavrier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Firstly, annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 10), as regards the applicant’s name and, secondly, an application for damages.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the application for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire.

2. The application for damages is dismissed.

3. Each party shall bear its own costs.

4. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/15

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Akhras v Council

(Case T-579/11 R)

(Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation and provisional measures - Lack of urgency - Lack of serious and irreparable harm)

2012/C 39/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tarif Akhras (Homs, Syria) (represented by: S. Ashley and S. Millar, Solicitors, D. Wyatt QC and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents)

Re:

In essence, application for provisional measures and suspension of operation of Council Decision 2011/522/CFSP of 2 September 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 16), Council Regulation (EU) No 878/2011 of 2 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 1), Council Decision 2011/628/CFSP of 23 September 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 247, p. 17), and Council Regulation (EU) No 1011/2011 of 13 October 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 (OJ 2011 L 269, p. 18), in so far as those texts refer to the applicant

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/20

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2012 — Igcar Chemicals v ECHA

(Case T-526/11) (1)

2012/C 184/41

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/24

Order of the General Court of 17 January 2012 — Afriqiyah Airways v Council

(Case T-436/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya - Removal from the list of persons and entities concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 89/41

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Afriqiyah Airways (Tripoli, Libya) (represented by: B. Sarfati, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-M. Joséphidès and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2011/300/CFSP of 23 May 2011 implementing Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 85) in so far as it concerns the applicant

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/10

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2012 — Woodman Labs v OHIM — 2 Mas 2 Publicidad Integral (HERO)

(Case T-606/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 273/16

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Woodman Labs, Inc. (Sausalito, United States) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: 2 Mas 2 Publicidad Integral, SL (Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2011 (Case R 876/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between 2 Mas 2 Publicidad Integral, SL and Woodman Labs, Inc.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 373/13

Order of the General Court of 18 October 2012 — Preparados Alimenticios del Sur v Commission

(Case T-402/11) (1)

2012/C 373/22

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
Order of the General Court of 5 September 2012 — Farage v Parliament and Buzek

(Case T-564/11) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Decision of the President of the Parliament imposing on a Member of the Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days - Decision of the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Parliament declaring inadmissible the Member’s request for defence of his Parliamentary immunity - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2012/C 331/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nigel Paul Farage (Brussels (Belgium)) (represented by: P. Bennett, solicitor)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz and D. Moore, acting as Agents) and Jerzy Buzek (Brussels (Belgium))

Re:

ACTION for annulment, first, of the decision of the President of the Parliament of 2 March 2010 imposing on the applicant the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days, secondly, of the decision of the Bureau of the Parliament of 24 March 2010 confirming the above decision of the President of the Parliament, thirdly, of the decision of the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Parliament declaring inadmissible the applicant’s request for defence of immunity and, fourthly, of an unspecified decision of the Parliament.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Nigel Paul Farage is to bear his own costs and to pay those of the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/24

Order of the General Court of 11 December 2012 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Hartmann (ATLAS TRANSPORT)

(Case T-584/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 38/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Atlas Transport GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, K. Schmidt-Hern and B. Weichhaus, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Alfred Hartmann (Leer, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 September 2011 (Case R 2262/2010-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Mr Alfred Hartmann and Atlas Transport GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The parties are to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 9/36

Order of the General Court of 15 November 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-286/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Non-contractual liability - Compensation for the damage resulting from the fact that a letter concerning the costs in a case was sent to the lawyer who represented the appellant in that case - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2013/C 9/65

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2011 in Case F-21/10 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 189/29

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Sigla v OHIM (VIPS CLUB)

(Case T-673/11) (1)

2013/C 189/60

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 71/27

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2013 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

(Case T-167/11) (1)

2013/C 71/45

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/44

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2013 — Unipol Banca v OHIM — Union Investment Privatfonds (unicard)

(Case T-574/11) (1)

2014/C 45/75

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 6, 7.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/22

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-475/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Reimbursement of recoverable expenses - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 336/46

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2011 in Case F-67/10 Marcuccio v Commission ECR-SC I-A-0000 and II-0000, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/72

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2014 — Elsid and Others v Commission

(Case T-557/11) (1)

2014/C 315/118

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 370, 17.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 159/24

Order of the General Court of 27 March 2014 — Ecologistas en Acción v Commission

(Case T-603/11) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the carrying out of an industrial project on a site protected under Directive 92/43/EEC - Documents originating from a Member State - Opposition by the Member State - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings - Environmental information - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

2014/C 159/33

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Ecologistas en Acción-CODA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Doreste Hernández, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and I. Martínez del Peral, acting as Agents)

Intervening party in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by S. Centeno Huerta, then by M. J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, abogados del Estado)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 23 September 2011 refusing to grant the applicant access to certain documents concerning approval of the project to construct a port in Granadilla (Tenerife, Spain), sent by the Spanish authorities to the Commission pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ecologistas en Acción-CODA is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — VMS Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-613/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: VMS Deutschland Holdings GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany) (represented by: initially, D. Pohl, G. Burwitz, M. Maier and P. Werner, then, D. Pohl and G. Burwitz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by VMS Deutschland Holdings GmbH;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
Case T-355/11: Order of the General Court of 1 June 2015 — Segovia Bonet v OHIM — IES (IES) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)

Order of the General Court of 1 June 2015 — Segovia Bonet v OHIM — IES (IES)

(Case T-355/11) ( 1 )

‛(Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)’

Parties

Applicant: Jorge Segovia Bonet (Madrid, Spain) (represented initially by M. López Camba and J.L. Rivas Zurdo, subsequently by J.L. Rivas Zurdo, E. Seijo Veiguela and I. Munilla Muñoz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: IES Insurance Engineering Services Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Caneva, G. Locurto and M. Lucchini, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 March 2011 (Case R 749/2010-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Jorge Segovia Bonet and IES Insurance Engineering Services Srl.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener are ordered to bear their own costs and each to pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

( 1 ) OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.