ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 9 April 2021 — Laroni v Parliament

(Case T-415/19) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Single statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected for Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Resolution No 14/2018, on pensions - Change in the amount of pensions for Members of the Italian national Parliament - Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amount of pensions for certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Death of the applicant - Proceedings not resumed by the successors - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 228/39)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Nereo Laroni (Venice, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the note of 11 April 2019 of the Parliament concerning adjustment of the amount of the pension which the applicant receives following the entry into force on 1 January 2019 of Resolution No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 December 2020 — FF v Commission

(Case T-653/19) (1)

(2021/C 62/62)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 October 2021 — Arris Global v Commission

(Case T-731/19) (1)

(2021/C 502/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 August 2021 — Imagina Media Audiovisual and Others v Commission

(Case T-268/19) (1)

(2021/C 422/50)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 October 2022 — Homoki v Commission

(Case T-517/19 INTP) (1)

(Interpretation of a judgment - Inadmissiblity)

(2022/C 463/61)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Andrea Homoki (Gyál, Hungary) (represented by: T. Hüttl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Béres and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her application under Article 168 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the applicant asks the General Court to interpret the judgment of 1 September 2021, Homoki v Commission (T-517/19, not published, EU:T:2021:529).

Operative part of the order

1. The request for interpretation is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Ms Andrea Homoki is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2021 — CE v Committee of the Regions

(Case T-355/19 INTP) (1)

(Procedure - Interpretation of a judgment - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 95/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions (represented by: M. Esparrago Arzadun and S. Bachotet, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application for interpretation of the judgment of 16 June 2021, CE v Committee of the Regions (T-355/19, EU:T:2021:369).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interpretation is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. CE shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.
Order of the President of the General Court of 4 May 2020 — Csordas and Others v Commission

(Case T-146/20 R)

(Application for interim measures - Civil service - Elections for the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee - Regularity - Supervisory obligation of the institution - Application for interim measures - No prima facie case)

(2020/C 209/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Annamaria Csordas (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Adrian Sorin Cristescu (Luxembourg), Jean Putz (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg), Miguel Vicente Nunez (Luxembourg) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska, T. Lilamand and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and Article 91(4) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union seeking, principally, in the first place, suspension of the operation of (i) the memo of 26 November 2019 from the polling office declaring the results of the elections for the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee, (ii) the Commission’s decision of 28 November 2019 concerning the calculation of the representativeness of representative trade unions and staff associations in the institution, (iii) the mandate of the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee resulting from the elections of November 2019, (iv) the appointment by the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee of its delegates to the Commission’s Central Staff Committee, and (v) any other decision concerning the allocation of additional resources to the Commission’s staff representatives, and, in the second place, an order requiring the Commission to retain the outgoing Staff Committee until the judgment is handed down in the main proceedings, while limiting its mandate to current business, and, in the alternative, an order requiring the Commission, first, to limit to current business the mandate of the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee resulting from the elections of November 2019 and, second, an order requiring that local section to appoint to the Commission’s Central Staff Committee the representatives proposed by Union Syndicale Luxembourg.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24)

(Case T-38/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark LOTTO24 - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 9/32)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Lotto24 AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: O. Brexl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Manea and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 November 2019 (Case R 1216/2019-2), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign LOTTO24 as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Lotto24 AG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 August 2020 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-76/20) (1)

(2020/C 371/36)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 103, 30.3.2020.
Order of the General Court of 14 December 2020 — ClientEarth v Commission

(Case T-255/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Comitology - Technical Committee on Motor Vehicles - Agenda for the 79th meeting of the committee - Right to information applicable in the Member States of the European Union as regards emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 53/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ClientEarth AISBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Logue, Solicitor, and J. Kenny, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude, C. Ehrbar and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission of 26 February 2020 refusing to grant access to certain parts of the minutes of the 79th meeting of the Technical Committee on Motor Vehicles of 12 February 2019.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 October 2020 — CH and CN v Parliament

(Case T-222/20) (1)

(2021/C 19/80)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 February 2021 — Colombani v EEAS

(Case T-507/20) (1)

(2021/C 138/72)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — JD v EIB

(Case T-608/20) (1)

(2021/C 79/50)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 March 2021 — Paravan v EUIPO — paragon (Paragon)

(Case T-11/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 217/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Paravan GmbH (Pfronstetten-Aichelau, Germany) (represented by: I. Jung and L. Delpy, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: paragon GmbH & Co. KGaA (Delbrück, Germany) (represented by: A. Wulff, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 October 2019 (Case R 28/2019-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Paravan GmbH and paragon GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Paravan GmbH and paragon GmbH & Co. KGaA shall bear their own respective costs and each pay half of the costs of the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 March 2021 — NEC OncoImmunity v EASME

(Case T-132/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) - Grant agreement - Termination letter - Act coming within a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable - Inadmissibility - Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 - Loss of SME status)

(2021/C 163/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: NEC OncoImmunity AS (Oslo, Norway) (represented by: T. Nordby, R. Bråthen and O. Brouwer, lawyers)

Defendant: Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (represented by: G. Niddam and A. Galea, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application primarily based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision allegedly contained in EASME's letter No Ares (2019) 7905893 of 23 December 2019 terminating the grant agreement concluded under the ‘Horizon 2020’ framework programme for research and innovation (2014-2020) and, in the alternative, an application based on Article 272 TFEU seeking a declaration that the terms of that agreement were breached.

Operative part of the order

1. The action as dismissed as inadmissible.

2. NEC OncoImmunity AS is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 May 2021 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services)

(Case T-263/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 278/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rochem Group AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rochem Marine Srl (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: R. Gioia and L. Mansi, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2020 (Case R 1545/2019-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Rochem Marine and Rochem Group.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Rochem Group AG and Rochem Marine Srl.

(1) OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission

(Case T-140/20) (1)

(2021/C 252/63)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 2 July 2021 — MD v Commission

(Case T-552/20) (1)

(2021/C 357/52)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.
Order of the General Court of 14 June 2021 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Zagg (Protective cover for computer hardware)

(Case T-564/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a protective cover for computer hardware - Ground for invalidity - Unauthorised use of a work protected under the copyright law of a Member State - Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Request that witnesses be heard - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 310/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor GmbH (Bensheim, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zagg Inc. (Midvale, Utah, United States) (represented by: T. Schmitz and M. Breuer, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 June 2020 (Case R 296/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between TrekStor and Zagg.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. TrekStor GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 378, 9.11.2020.
Order of the General Court of 28 September 2021 — NB v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-648/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Decision not to appoint the applicant to grade AST 10 - Time limit for lodging a complaint - Delay - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 490/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: NB (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: J. Inghelram and A. Ysebaert, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment, first, of the decision not to appoint the applicant to grade AST 10; second, and so far as necessary, of the decision to appoint A to that grade; and, third, purely in the alternative, of all the decisions to appoint other officials to that grade.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. NB shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 443, 21.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 9 August 2021 — Telefónica Germany v EUIPO — Google (LOOP)

(Case T-305/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 422/23)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Google LLC (Mountain View, California, United States) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, C. Schmitt and S. Clotten, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 March 2020 (Case R 281/2019-4), relating to cancellation proceedings between Google and Telefónica Germany.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG and Google LLC are ordered to bear their own costs and each to pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2021 — The Floow v Commission

(Case T-765/20) (1)

(2022/C 95/64)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.
Order of the General Court of 3 November 2021 — Aurubis v Commission

(Case T-729/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Greenhouse gases - Allocation of emission allowances - Request to transfer emission certificates to Germany - Request made in the context of national proceedings for interim relief aimed at guaranteeing the effectiveness of the preliminary ruling procedure in Case C-271/20 - Commission refusal decision - Locus standi - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 2/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Aurubis AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and J. Hoss, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 8 December 2020 refusing the request of the Deutsche Emissionshandelsstelle (German Emissions Trading Authority) to transfer, as a protective measure, to the national holding account of the Federal Republic of Germany or, in the alternative, to the applicant’s operator holding account, by 31 December 2020 at the latest, a number of greenhouse gas emission allowances corresponding to the number of additional allowances covered by the application filed by the applicant with the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Administrative Court, Berlin, Germany) for the free allocation of emission allowances for the third greenhouse gas emission allowance trading period.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Aurubis AG shall pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

(1) OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
Order of the General Court of 16 June 2022 — bonnanwalt v EUIPO — Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others (tagesschau)

(Case T-83/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark tagesschau - Partial revocation - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 303/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: T. Wendt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Bayerischer Rundfunk (Munich, Germany) and the eight other interveners whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: B. Krause, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 December 2019 (Case R 1487/2019-2).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Luna Italia v EUIPO — Luna (LUNA SPLENDIDA)

(Case T-571/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark LUNA SPLENDIDA - Earlier EU figurative mark Luna - Relative ground for refusal - Article 53(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 119/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Luna Italia Srl (Cantù, Italy) (represented by: N. Papakostas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Luna AE (Agios Stefanos, Greece) (represented by: M. Sioufas, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 June 2020 (Case R 1895/2019 5), concerning invalidity proceedings between Luna and Luna Italia.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Luna Italia Srl is ordered to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Luna AE.

(1) OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2021 — Polynt v ECHA

(Case T-207/21 R)

(Application for interim measures - REACH - Hexahydro-4-methylphthalic anhydride substance - Obligation to register - Evaluation of dossiers - Examination of testing proposals - Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 320/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Polynt SpA (Scanzorosciate, Italy) (represented by: C. Mereu, P. Sellar and S. Abdel-Qader, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and N. Knight, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the suspension of the operation of Decision A 015 2019 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 9 February 2021, which requests the applicant to carry out an Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS) of the substance hexahydro-4-methylphthalic anhydride or for the grant of any other interim measures deemed appropriate.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed;
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 3 November 2021 — PBL and WA v Commission

(Case T-538/21 R)

(Interim relief - State aid - Aid granted by France to a professional football club - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2022/C 2/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Penya Barça Lyon: Plus que des supporters (PBL) (Bron, France), WA (represented by: J. Branco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and G. Braga da Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for, first, annulment of the Commission’s letter of 1 September 2021 bearing the reference COMP.C.4/AH/mdr 2021(092342) and responding to a State aid complaint (SA.64489 — State aid to the Paris Saint-Germain football club) and, second, directions to be issued to the Commission.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.