ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission

(Case T-419/18 R)

((Interim proceedings - Competition - Euro Interbank Offered Rates (Euribor) - Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD) - Rejection of the request for confidential treatment of certain information contained in a decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Principle of the presumption of innocence - Application for interim measures - No prima facie case))

(2019/C 44/96)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Crédit agricole (Montrouge, France), Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (Montrouge) (represented by: J.-P. Tran Thiet, J. Jourdan, J.-J. Lemonnier, lawyers, and M. Powell, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin, M. Farley and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking, first, a suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2018) 2743 final of 27 April 2018 concerning objections submitted by Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to the disclosure of information by way of publication, in accordance with Article 8 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (Case AT.39914 — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD)) and, secondly, an order that the Commission refrain from publishing a version of its Decision C(2016) 8530 final of 7 December 2016 relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement [on the European Economic Area (EEA)] (Case AT.39914 — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD)) containing elements which are allegedly confidential.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 September 2018 — Rewe-Beteiligungs-Holding International v EUIPO — Wessanen Benelux (BonNatura)

(Case T-194/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2018/C 427/104)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rewe-Beteiligungs-Holding International GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: S. Brandstätter, M. Kinkeldey and J. Rosenhäger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Sesma Merino and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Wessanen Benelux BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 January 2013 (Case R 949/2017-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Wessanen Benelux and Rewe-Beteiligungs-Holding International.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Rewe-Beteiligungs-Holding International GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (AUREL BGC)

(Case T-522/18) (1)

(2019/C 65/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 392, 29.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 November 2018 — Husky CZ v EUIPO — Husky of Tostock (HUSKY)

(Case T-82/18) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark HUSKY - Earlier EU word and figurative marks HUSKY - Relative ground for refusal - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2019/C 44/91)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Husky CZ s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Husky of Tostock Ltd (Woodbridge, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2018 (Case R 812/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Husky of Tostock and Husky CZ.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Husky CZ s.r.o. shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Associazione Granosalus v Commission

(Case T-125/18) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Plant-protection products - Substance active ‘glyphosate’ - Renewal of inclusion in the annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 131/55)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Associazione Nazionale Granosalus — Liberi Cerealicoltori & Consumatori (Associazione GranoSalus) (Foggia, Italy) (represented by: G. Dalfino, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, D. Bianchi, G. Koleva and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2324 of 12 December 2017 renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2017 L 333, p. 10).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is to be dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to give a ruling on the applications for leave to intervene by Helm AG, Monsanto Europe NV/SA, Monsanto Company, Nufarm GmbH & Co., Nufarm, Albaugh Europe Sàrl, Albaugh UK Ltd, Albaugh TKI d.o.o. and Barclay Chemicals Manfuacturing Ltd.

3. Associazione Nazionale GranoSalus — Liberi Cerealicoltori & Consumatori (Associazione GranoSalus) is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. Helm, Monsanto Europe, Monsanto, Nufarm GmbH & Co. KG, Nufarm, Albaugh Europe, Albaugh UK, Albaugh TKI and Barclay Chemicals Manufacturing are each to bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — PO v EEAS

(Case T-494/18) (1)

(2019/C 103/79)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 381, 22.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 April 2019 — Electroquimica Onubense v ECHA

(Case T-481/18) (1)

(REACH - Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 206/45)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Electroquimica Onubense (Palos de la Frontera, Spain) (represented by D.González Blanco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by J.-P Trnka, C.-M. Bergerat and M. Heikkila, acting as Agents, and C. García Molyneux, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against ECHA Decision SME D(2018)2931-DC of 31 May 2018, finding that the applicant does not fulfil the requirements for the fee reduction provided for in respect of small enterprises and imposing an administrative charge on it.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Electroquimica Onubense, SL is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 March 2019 — SKS Import Export v Commission

(Case T-239/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Free movement of capital - Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (AML/CTF) - Directive (EU) 2015/849 - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/212 - Inclusion of Tunisia on the list of high-risk third countries - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 164/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société Kammama Saber (SKS) Import Export (Sousse Jaouhara, Tunisia) (represented by: H. Chelly, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, A. Bouquet and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/212 of 13 December 2017, amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards adding Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago, and Tunisia to the table in point I of the Annex (OJ 2018 L 41, p. 4).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Société Kammama Saber (SKS) Import Export shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2019 — ITSA v Commission

(Case T-396/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Approximation of laws - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related product - Establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products - Delegated Regulation and implementing acts - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 230/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) (Sunbury-on-Thames, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Scanvic, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene and C. Valero, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/573 of 15 December 2017 on key elements of data storage contracts to be concluded as part of a traceability system for tobacco products (OJ 2018 L 96, p.1), Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/574 of 15 December 2017 on technical standards for the establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products (OJ 2018 L 96, p.7), and Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/576 of 15 December 2017 on technical standards for security features applied to tobacco products (OJ 2018 L 96, p 57).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of the Council of the European Union.

3. International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

4. The Council shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — YS v Commission

(Case T-572/18) (1)

(2019/C 213/84)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 July 2019 — romwell v EUIPO (twistpac)

(Case T-662/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark twistpac - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty of care - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 328/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: romwell GmbH & Co. KG (Breitscheidt, Germany) (represented by: C. Spintig, S. Pietzcker and M. Prasse, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 August 2018 (Case R 336/2018-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign twistpac as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. romwell GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2019 — Bizbike and Hartmobile v Commission

(Case T-426/18) (1)

(2019/C 246/50)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition, has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 9 October 2019 — Esim Chemicals v EUIPO — Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite (ESIM Chemicals)

(Case T-713/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark ESIM Chemicals - Earlier national word mark ESKIM - Relative ground for refusal - Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed - Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 423/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Esim Chemicals GmbH (Linz, Austria) (represented by: I. Rungg and I. Innerhofer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite SpA (Rome, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 October 2018 (Case R 1267/2018-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite and Esim Chemicals.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Esim Chemicals GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 44, 4.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — ruwido austria v EUIPO (transparent pairing)

(Case T-649/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark transparent pairing - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 399/75)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ruwido austria GmbH (Neumarkt am Wallersee, Austria) (represented by: A. Ginzburg, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 August 2018 (Case R 2487/2017-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign transparent pairing as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. ruwido austria GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 February 2020 — Bernis and Others v ECB

(Case T-564/18) (1)

(2020/C 137/86)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi v Commission

(Case T-763/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Allegedly unlawful aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers - Alleged Commission decisions declaring the aid measure compatible with the internal market - Time limit for bringing an action - Point from which time starts to run - Knowledge acquired - Proof - Duty of diligence - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 61/49)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. (Lazarus Kft.) (Békés, Hungary) (represented by: L. Szabó, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions allegedly adopted by the Commission concerning, first, complaint SA.29432 — CP 290/2009 — Hungary — Aid for the employment of disabled workers alleged to be unlawful due to the discriminatory nature of the legislation and, second, complaint SA.45498 (FC/2016) — Complaint by OPS Újpest-lift Kft. concerning the State aid granted between 2006 and 2012 to undertakings employing disabled workers.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. (Lazarus Kft.) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 March 2021 — Brand IP Licensing v EUIPO — Facebook (lovebook)

(Case T-728/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 163/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Brand IP Licensing (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: J. MacKenzie, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Facebook, Inc. (Menlo Park, California, United States) (represented by: Y. Zhou, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 October 2018 (Case R 2279/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Facebook and Brand IP Licensing.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Brand IP Licensing Ltd and Facebook, Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 54, 11.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — Banco Comercial Português and Others v Commission

(Case T-298/18) (1)

(2020/C 433/84)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Wendel and Others v Commission

(Case T-124/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/49)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Order of the General Court of 28 October 2021 — Diusa Rendering and Assograssi v Commission

(Case T-201/18) (1)

(Public health - Rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies - Ban on exporting organic fertilisers and soil improvers derived from Category 2 material - Failure by the Commission to initiate the procedure for re-examining the ban - Action for failure to act - Proposal of draft measures putting an end to the failure to act - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 513/39)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Diusa Rendering Srl (Piacenza, Italy) and Assograssi — Associazione Nazionale Produttori Grassi e Proteine Animali (Buccinasco, Italy) (represented by: M. Moretto, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi, W. Farrell and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 265 TFEU seeking a finding that the Commission unlawfully failed to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 5a of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ 1999 L 184, p. 23) so as to re-examine the ban on exporting organic fertilisers and soil improvers derived from Category 2 material laid down by Article 43(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation) (OJ 2009 L 300, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Diusa Rendering Srl and Assograssi — Associazione Nazionale Produttori Grassi e Proteine Animali.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 September 2019 — Café Camelo v EUIPO — Camel Brand (CAMEL BRAND FOOD PRODUCTS)

(Case T-244/19) (1)

(2019/C 363/47)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.
Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — CJ v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-1/19) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Documents available to the public on the internet relating to closed General Court and Civil Service Tribunal cases - Request for anonymity ex post - Failure of the Court of Justice of the European Union to respond to the request - Action for failure to act - Position adopted in the course of the proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 295/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: CJ (represented by V. Kolias, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by J. Inghelram, Á. Almendros Manzano and V. Hanley-Emilsson, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Court of Justice of the European Union unlawfully failed to grant the applicant anonymity, ex post, as regards publicly available documents relating to closed General Court and Civil Service Tribunal cases or, in the alternative, to ensure that versions bearing his name (‘nominal versions’) are not accessible to internet search engine providers.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 October 2019 — Garriga Polledo and Others v Parliament

(Case T-102/19 and T-132/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament - Amendment of the additional voluntary pension scheme - Regulatory act - Implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 423/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants in Case T-102/19: Salvador Garriga Polledo (Madrid, Spain) and the 43 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: A. Schmitt and A. Waisse, lawyers)

Applicant in Case T-132/19: Richard Ashworth (Lingfield, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Schmitt and A. Waisse, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, M. Ecker and Z. Nagy, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the Parliament of 10 December 2018 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (OJ 2018 C 466, p.8).

Operative part of the order

1. Cases T-102/19 and T-132/19 are joined for the purpose of the present order.

2. The actions are dismissed as inadmissible.

3. Mr Salvador Garriga Polledo and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex and Mr Richard Ashworth shall bear their own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.