ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 121/33

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Troszczynski v Parliament

(Case T-626/16 R)

((Interim measures - Member of the European Parliament - Recovery by offsetting of allowances paid in the context of the reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

(2017/C 121/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mylène Troszczynski (Noyon, France) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: G. Corstens and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of operation of the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 23 June 2016 concerning the recovery from the applicant of EUR 56 554 and of debit note No 2016-888 issued pursuant to that decision

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/20

Order of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Klausner Holz Niedersachsen v Commission

(Case T-101/16) (1)

((Action for failure to act - State aid - Supply of timber - Preliminary examination of an alleged State aid granted by the German authorities in the form of contracts for the supply of timber - Commission’s failure to adopt a position within a reasonable period of time - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2017/C 178/26)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Klausner Holz Niedersachsen GmbH (Saalburg-Ebersdorf, Germany) (represented by: D. Reich, C. Hipp and T. Ilgner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to take a decision, within a reasonable period of time, in the context of the preliminary examination of an alleged State aid granted to the applicant by the German authorities in the form of contracts for the supply of timber.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Klausner Holz Niedersachsen GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/63

Order of the General Court of 9 March 2017 — Puma v EUIPO — Senator (TRINOMIC)

(Case T-896/16) (1)

(2017/C 144/99)

Language of the case: German

The President of the General Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 231/25

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — BSH Electrodomesticos España v EUIPO — DKSH International (Ufesa)

(Case T-785/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Ufesa - Amicable settlement - Acquisition by the applicant of the mark applied for - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 231/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BSH Electrodomesticos España, SA (Huarte-Pamplona, Spain) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Duarte Guimarães and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: DKSH International Ltd. (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Johansson and J. Stock, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 July 2016 (Case R 1691/2015-1) concerning opposition proceedings between BSH Electrodomesticos España and DKSH International.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate in the action.

2. BSH Electrodomesticos España, SA shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office.

3. DKSH International Ltd. shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/30

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2017 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-73/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - EIB staff - Psychological harassment - Non-contractual liability - Errors of law - Appeal manifestly unfounded))

(2017/C 213/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented initially by G. Nuvoli and T. Gilliams, and subsequently by G. Nuvoli and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (sitting as a single judge) of 18 December 2015, De Nicola v EIB (F-37/12, EU:F:2015:162), seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/22

Order of the General Court of 21 June 2017 — Inox Mare v Commission

(Case T-347/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Customs Union - Commission decision finding that the repayment of import duties is not justified in a particular case - Action brought by a separate operator - No direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 269/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Inox Mare Srl (Rimini, Italy) (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros, J. Baquero Cruz and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 9672 final of 6 January 2016 finding that the repayment of import duties is not justified in a particular case (REM 02/14).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Inox Mare Srl shall bear its own costs and also pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/17

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2017 — Megasol Energie v Commission

(Case T-152/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Dumping - Subsidies - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells) consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan - Extension to those imports of the definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive countervailing duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells) originating in or consigned from China - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 269/23)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Megasol Energie AG (Wangen an der Aare, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Wegner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche, A. Demeneix and K. Blanck-Putz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 of 11 February 2016 extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China to imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not (OJ 2016 L 37, p. 56), and of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185 of 11 February 2016 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China to imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not (OJ 2016 L 37, p. 76), in so far as they apply to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Megasol Energie AG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 357/32

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2017 — Clarke v EUIPO

(Case T-548/16) (1)

(2017/C 357/41)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 221, 6.7.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-63/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 293/34

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 July 2017 — PGNiG Supply & Trading v Commission

(Case T-849/16 R)

((Application for interim measures - Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2009/73/EC - Application by the Bundesnetzagentur for review of the exemption of the OPAL pipeline from the EU requirements for its operation - Commission decision amending the exemption from the EU requirements - Application for a stay of execution of a measure - Lack of any urgency))

(2017/C 293/40)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Jeżewski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Request on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on review of the exemption of the OPAL pipeline from the requirements on third party access and tariff regulation granted under Directive 2003/55/EC.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The order of 23 December 2016, PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH v Commission (T-849/16 R) is revoked.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/18

Order of the General Court of 15 November 2017 — Pilla v Commission and EACEA

(Case T-784/16) (1)

((Action for annulment and damages - Provisional measures - Application for legal aid submitted after an action had been brought - Creative Europe Programme (2014-2020) - Call for proposals on support for a preparatory action - Decision rejecting candidature due to failure to respect an eligibility criterion - Grants available only to legal persons - Disregard of the formal requirements - Acts not attributable to EACEA - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2018/C 013/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Rinaldo Pilla (Venafro, Italy) (represented by: A. Silvestri, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and C. Gheorghiu, acting as Agents) and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented by: H. Monet and V. Sansonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission decision of 2 September 2016 rejecting the candidature submitted by the applicant in the call for proposals ‘EAC/S05/2016 — Support for a preparatory action to create an EU Festival Award and an EU Festival Label in the field of Culture: EFFE (Europe for Festivals — Festivals for Europe)’ of 26 April 2016, secondly, application seeking, principally, a declaration by the Court that the applicant’s candidature is admissible or, in the alternative, annulment of the ‘selection procedure itself’, thirdly, application seeking suspension of the selection procedure and, fourthly, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant by reason of the rejection of his candidature.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible in so far as it is directed against the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA).

2. The action is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law in so far as it is directed against the European Commission.

3. The application for legal aid is rejected.

4. Mr Rinaldo Pilla la shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 392/29

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — Gyarmathy v EMCDDA

(Case T-297/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Temporary staff - EMCDDA staff - Decision not to renew a contract of employment - Termination of the contract - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Administrative inquiry - Impartiality of the inquiry))

(2017/C 392/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Valéria Anna Gyarmathy (Győr, Hungary) (represented by: A. Véghely, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (represented by: D. Storti and F. Pereyra, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015, Gyarmathy v EMCDDA (F-79/13, EU:F:2015:49), seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Ms Valéria Anna Gyarmathy is to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 104/54

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2018 — Stips v Commission

(Case T-740/16) (1)

(2018/C 104/70)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 475, 19.12.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 52/30

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2017 — Techniplan v Commission

(Case T-853/16) (1)

((Action for failure to act - Defined position of the Commission - Action for damages - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Application for an injunction - Manifest inadmissibility - Manifest lack of jurisdiction))

(2018/C 052/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Techniplan Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: R. Giuffrida and A. Bonavita, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu, acting as Agent)

Re:

First, application based on Article 265 TFEU and seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to act vis-à-vis the applicant and, secondly, application seeking imposition of the obligation to act provided for in Article 266 TFEU and the payment of a sum by way of compensation for the damage suffered ‘for each day of delay in compliance’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Techniplan Srl shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.
Case T-474/16: Order of the General Court of 29 May 2018 — Sowaer v Commission

Order of the General Court of 29 May 2018 — Sowaer v Commission

(Case T-474/16) ( 1 )

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 166/29

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2018 –Pio de Bragança v EUIPO — Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (QUIS UT DEUS)

(Case T-229/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS - Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark - Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 166/38)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Duarte Pio de Bragança (Sintra, Portugal) (represented by: J. Sardinha, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J. Motta Veiga, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2016 (Case R 621/2015-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Duarte Pio De Bragança and Ordem de São Miguel da Ala.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 — Bowles v BCE

(Case T-677/16) (1)

(2019/C 139/111)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-890/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Public financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link - Individual aid - Act not open to challenge - Purely confirmatory measure - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 65/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Scandlines Danmark ApS (Copenhagen, Denmark) and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and by S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented initially by: C. Thorning, and subsequently by J. Nymann-Lindegren, acting as Agents, and by R. Holdgaard, lawyer)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 30 September 2016 concerning State aid implemented by Denmark for the financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH are to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

3. The Kingdom of Denmark is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 November 2021 — Aresu v Commission

(Case T-524/16) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - 2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations - Travelling time - Home leave - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 73/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Antonio Aresu (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and F. Blanc, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Tavena and M. Ecker, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision no longer to grant the applicant, as of 1 January 2014, travelling time of five days which he enjoyed previously on the basis of Article 7 of Annex V to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, as amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 October 2013 (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 15).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Antonio Aresu shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those of the interlocutory proceedings.

3. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-106/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
Order of the General Court of 18 December 2020 — Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland and Others v Commission

(Case T-146/16) (1)

(State aid - Annulment of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 62/37)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland (‘s-Graveland, Netherlands) and the 12 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: P. Kuypers and M. de Wit, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman, J. Langer and M. Noort, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 5929 final of 2 September 2015 on State aid SA.27301 (2015/NN) — Netherlands, relating to the subsidised acquisition or free granting of nature land, a summary of which has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2016 C 9, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene lodged by Vereniging Gelijkberechtiging Grondbezitters and the other applicants for leave to intervene whose names are set out in Annex II.

3. Each party shall bear its own costs.

4. Vereniging Gelijkberechtiging Grondbezitters and the other applicants for leave to intervene whose names are set out in Annex II shall bear the costs relating to their application to intervene.

(1) OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/25

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 March 2017 — Numbi v Council

(Case T-144/17 R)

((Application for interim measures - Restrictive measures - Democratic Republic of the Congo - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 178/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: John Numbi (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: O. Okito and A. Ouannès, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 of 12 December 2016 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2016 L 336 I, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 277/61

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2017 — Austrian Power Grid v ACER

(Case T-53/17) (1)

(2017/C 277/87)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 95, 27.3.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/37

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2017 — King.com v EUIPO — TeamLava (Animated icons)

(Case T-96/17) (1)

(2017/C 221/52)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 402/55

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2017 — Danjaq v EUIPO (Shaken, not stirred)

(Case T-74/17) (1)

(2017/C 402/73)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 309/41

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2017 — Bank of New York Mellon v EUIPO — Nixen Partners (NEXEN PULSE)

(Case T-260/17) (1)

(2017/C 309/56)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.