ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 326/35

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 13 July 2016 — Siragusa v Council

(Case F-124/15) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Leaving the service - Official’s application to be granted retirement - Amendment of the provisions of the Staff Regulations after the application - Alleged withdrawal of an earlier decision))

(2016/C 326/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant Sergio Siragusa (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants: European Parliament (represented by: M. Dean and D. Nessaf, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to grant the applicant’s application for early retirement, in so far as it was adopted after the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations, thereby withdrawing the earlier favourable decision, and an application for damages in respect of the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Sergio Siragusa shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Parliament shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 414, 14/12/2015, p. 42.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 191/54

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 April 2016 — Glowacz-De-Chevilly v Commission

(Case F-72/15) (1)

(2016/C 191/80)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 279, 24/8/2015, p. 55.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/18

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 May 2014 — SolarWorld and Others v Council

(Case T-141/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - Dumping - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells) originating or consigned from China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

2014/C 235/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: SolarWorld AG (Bonn, Germany); Brandoni solare SpA, (Castelfidardo, Italy); and Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: L. Ruessmann, lawyer, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, Agent)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Article 3 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 of 2 December 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2013 L 325, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — Bergallou v Parliament and Council

(Case T-22/14) (1)

(Action for annulment - Reform of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Less favourable scheme for lump sum payment of travel expenses and increase of annual leave by additional days off for traveling time - No individual concern - Non-contractual liability - Causal link - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part unfounded in law)

(2015/C 016/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Amal Bergallou (Lot, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and E. Taneva, agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, agents)

Re:

First, application for annulment brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Article 1(65)(b) and Article 1(67)(d) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 15), in so far as those provisions link the entitlement to reimbursement of travel expenses and travelling time for that travel to receipt of the expatriation or foreign-residence allowance, and, second, application for damages based on Article 340 TFEU, seeking compensation for material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Amal Bergallou shall bear her own costs and the costs incurred by the European Parliament and by the Council of the European Union.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene made by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/14

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — WeserWind v Commission

(Case T-173/14 R)

((Interim measures - State aid - National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source - Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Fumus boni juris))

2014/C 329/18

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: WeserWind GmbH Offshore Construction Georgsmarienhütte (Bremerhaven, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, lawyers)

Re:

Application for suspension of the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. The judgment in Case T-173/14 R WeserWind v Commission is set aside
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/23

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — Alsharghawi v Council

(Case T-532/14) (1)

((Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 056/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bashir Saleh Bashir Alsharghawi (Johannesburg, South Africa) (represented by: E. Moutet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (OJ 2011 L 58, p. 53), and, secondly, Council Decision 2011/178/CFSP of 23 March 2011 amending Decision 2011/137 (OJ 2011 L 78, p. 24), in so far as they apply to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Bashir Saleh Bashir Alsharghawi is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/27

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 September 2014 — Erbslöh Aluminium v Commission

(Case T-298/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - National support for the generation of renewable electricity - Commission decision to open the State aid formal investigation procedure - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case))

(2014/C 431/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Erbslöh Aluminium GmbH (Velbert, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz and B. Wißmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Re:

Application to suspend the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened the State aid formal investigation procedure concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 127/39

Order of the General Court of 27 January 2015 — Aluwerk Hettstedt v ECHA

(Case T-207/14) (1)

(2015/C 127/53)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 202, 30.6.2014.
Order of the General Court of 6 January 2015 — St'art and Others v Commission

(Case T-93/14) (1)

(Action for annulment - ‘European Creative Industries Alliance’ programme - ‘C-I Factor’ project aimed at establishing new instruments to encourage the funding of the cultural and creative industries - Debit note - Measure which is part of a purely contractual context from which it is inseparable - Inadmissibility)

(2015/C 073/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: St’art — Fonds d’investissement dans les entreprises culturelles (Mons, Belgium); Stichting Cultuur — Ondernemen (Amsterdam, Netherlands), and Angel Capital Innovations Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Dehin and C. Brüls, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude, J. Estrada de Solà and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the ‘decision of an unknown date, formalised on 29 November 2013 by the European Commission’, seeking to recover the sum of EUR 140 500,01 in the context of the ‘C-I Factor SI2.609157-2/G/ENT/CIP/11/C/N03C011’ project, issuing a debit note to that end and insisting, if necessary, on the joint and several liability of the other members of the consortium.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. St’art — Fonds d’investissement dans les entreprises culturelles, Stichting Cultuur — Ondernemen and Angel Capital Innovations Ltd shall bear their own respective costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/28

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 March 2015 — Europower v Commission

(Case T-383/14 R)

((Interim measures - Public works contracts - Tendering procedure - Construction and maintenance of a tri-generation plant - Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case - Lack of urgency))

(2015/C 155/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Europower SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: G. Cocco and L. Salomoni, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Cappelletti, L. Di Paolo and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, in essence, for suspension of operation of the decision of 3 April 2014 in which the Commission rejected the tender submitted by Europower in tendering procedure JRC IPR 2013 C04 0031 OC for the construction and maintenance of a tri-generation plant with a gas turbine on the Ispra (Italy) site of its Joint Research Centre (JRC) (OJ 2013/S 137-237146) and awarded the contract to CPL Concordia, and consequently all other subsequent decisions.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/39

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Polyblend v Commission

(Case T-303/14) (1)

(2015/C 155/52)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 245/22

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Klemme v Commission

(Case T-294/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate - Action for annulment - Application to amend the form of order sought - No new information - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 245/26)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Klemme AG (Lutherstadt Eisleben, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, M. Ringel, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The application seeking that the form of order sought in the present action be amended to cover Commission decision C (2014) 8786 final of 25 November 2014 relating to State Aid SA. 33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users is rejected as inadmissible.

3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

4. Klemme AG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

5. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/18

Order of the General Court of 16 April 2015 — Yoworld v OHIM — Nestlé (yogorino)

(Case T-246/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 221/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Yoworld SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Tornato and D. Hazan, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 December 2013 (Case R 115/2013-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Société des produits Nestlé SA and Yoworld SA.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.

2. The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 294/64

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland and Others v Commission

(Case T-280/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/78)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH (Cologne, Germany); Ineos Phenol GmbH (Gladbeck, Germany); and Ineos Vinyls Deutschland GmbH (Wilhelmshaven, Germany) (represented by: C. Arhold, L. Petersen, F.-A. Wesche, N. Wimmer and T. Woltering, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH, Ineos Phenol GmbH and Ineos Vinyls Deutschland GmbH shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 245/18

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Wirschaftsvereinigung Stahl and Others v Commission

(Case T-285/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity produced from renewable energy sources and energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after bringing the action - No need to adjudicate - Action for annulment - Application to amend the form of order sought - No new factors - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 245/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Wirschaftsvereinigung Stahl (Düsseldorf, Germany) and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the order (represented initially by: A. Reuter, C. Arhold, N. Wimmer, F.-A. Wesche, K. Kindereit, R. Busch, A. Hohler and T. Woltering, and subsequently by: A. Reuter, C. Bürger, T. Christner and G. Müllejans, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU concerning measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of electricity from renewable sources and energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the present action.

2. The application to amend the form of order sought to refer to Commission Decision C(2014) 8786 final of 25 November 2014 concerning State aid SA. 33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of electricity from renewable sources and energy-intensive users is rejected as inadmissible.

3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

4. Wirschaftsvereinigung Stahl and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the order shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

5. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 294/55

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Friedrich Wilhelms-Hütte Eisenguss v Commission

(Case T-178/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Friedrich Wilhelms-Hütte Eisenguss GmbH (Mülheim-an-der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. Renner, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: EFTA Surveillance Authority (represented by: initially X. Lewis, M. Schneider and J. Kaasin, then X. Lewis, M. Schneider, M. Moustakali and C. Perrin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for intervention submitted by Flachglas Torgau GmbH and Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG, by Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG and Kronoply GmbH, by Bayer MaterialScience AG, by Sabic Polyolefine GmbH, by Ineos Manufacturing Deutschland GmbH, Ineos Phenol GmbH and Ineos Vinyls Deutschland GmbH, and by Advansa GmbH, Akzo Nobel Industrial Chemicals GmbH, Aurubis AG, CBW Chemie GmbH, CFB Chemische Fabrik Brunsbüttel GmbH & Co. KG, Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH, Dralon GmbH, Hahl Filaments GmbH, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Siegen, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Salzgitter, Nabaltec AG, Siltronic AG and Wacker Chemie AG.

3. Friedrich Wilhelms-Hütte Eisenguss GmbH shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 294/66

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Advansa and Others v Commission

(Case T-283/14) (1)

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/81)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Advansa GmbH (Hamm, Germany); Akzo Nobel Industrial Chemicals GmbH (Ibbenbüren, Germany); Aurubis AG (Hamburg, Germany); Cabb GmbH (Gersthofen, Germany); CBW Chemie GmbH Bitterfeld-Wolfen (Bitterfeld-Wolfen, Germany); CFB Chemische Fabrik Brunsbüttel GmbH & Co. KG (Brunsbüttel, Germany); Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH (Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany); Dow Olefinverbund GmbH (Schkopau, Germany); Dow Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH (Stade, Germany); Dralon GmbH (Dormagen, Germany); Ems-Chemie (Neumünster) GmbH & Co. KG (Neumünster, Germany); Hahl Filaments GmbH (Munderkingen, Germany); ISP Marl GmbH (Marl, Germany); Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Siegen (Sulzbach, Germany); Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Salzgitter (Sulzbach); Nabaltec AG (Schwandorf, Germany); Siltronic AG (Munich, Germany); Trevira GmbH (Bobingen, Germany); Wacker Chemie AG (Munich); and Westfalen Industriegase GmbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: C. Arhold, L. Petersen, F.-A. Wesche, N. Wimmer and T. Woltering, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers)

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

3. Advansa GmbH, Akzo Nobel Industrial Chemicals GmbH, Aurubis AG, Cabb GmbH, CBW Chemie GmbH Bitterfeld-Wolfen, CFB Chemische Fabrik Brunsbüttel GmbH & Co. KG, Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH, Dow Olefinverbund GmbH, Dow Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH, Dralon GmbH, Ems-Chemie (Neumünster) GmbH & Co. KG, Hahl Filaments GmbH, ISP Marl GmbH, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Siegen, Messer Produktionsgesellschaft mbH Salzgitter, Nabaltec AG, Siltronic AG, Trevira GmbH, Wacker Chemie AG and Westfalen Industriegase GmbH shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

4. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/60

Order of the General Court of 24 September 2015 — Primo Valore v Commission

(Case T-630/14) (1)

(2015/C 381/83)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.