ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 March 2020 — Aceto Agricultural Chemicals v Commission

(Case T-612/19 R)

(Application for interim relief - Plant protection products - Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpropham - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2020/C 175/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp. Ltd (Chester, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Mereu and P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, A. Dawes and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/989 of 17 June 2019 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpropham, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2019 L 160, p. 11).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Lípidos Santiga v Commission

(Case T-561/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Energy - Directive (EU) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources - Limit on biofuels and biomass fuels produced from food and feed crops - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807 - Definition of raw materials presenting a high indirect land-use change (ILUC) risk - Palm oil - Standing to bring proceedings - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 255/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lípidos Santiga, SA (Santa Perpètua de Mogoda, Spain) (represented by: P. Muñiz Fernández, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and Y. Marinova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807 of 13 March 2019 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the determination of high indirect land-use change-risk feedstock for which a significant expansion of the production area into land with high carbon stock is observed and the certification of low indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels (OJ 2019 L 133, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Lípidos Santiga, SA, is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 April 2020 — Leonardo v Frontex

(Case T-849/19 R)

(Interim measures - Public service contracts - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

(2020/C 201/34)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Leonardo SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Parrella, lawyer)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: S. Drew, H. Caniard, C. Georgiadis and A. Gras, acting as Agents, and by M. Vanderstraeten, F. Biebuyck and V. Ost, lawyers)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures as regards a stay of execution of the call for tender published on 18 October 2019 by Frontex, entitled ‘Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) for Medium Altitude Long Endurance Maritime Aerial Surveillance’.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Koopman International v EUIPO — Tinnus Enterprises and Mystic Products (fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-839/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Suspension of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 348/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by G. van den Bergh and B. Brouwer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by A. Odle, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the provisional decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 September 2019 (Case R 1006/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mystic Products Import & Export and Koopman International, on the one hand, and Tinnus Enterprises, on the other hand.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Koopman International BV shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Tinnus Enterprises LLC.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court 17 June 2020 — Sánchez Cano v EUIPO — Grupo Osborne (EL TORO BALLS Fini)

(Case T-527/19) (1)

(2020/C 271/70)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Order of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Noguer Enríquez and Others v Commission

(Case T-22/19) (1)

(Action for damages - Monetary agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra - Alleged negligence on the part of the Commission regarding the content of the agreement - Alleged negligence on the part of the Commission in monitoring the implementation of the agreement - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 371/10)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Roser Noguer Enríquez (Andorra-la-Vella, Andorra), TB, Successors d’Higini Cierco García, SA (Andorra la Vella), Cierco Martínez 2 2003, SL (Andorra la Vella) (represented by: J. Álvarez González and S. San Felipe Menéndez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of, first, negligence on the part of the Commission in monitoring the implementation of the Monetary Agreement concluded on 30 June 2011 between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra and, second, the Commission’s negligence regarding the content of that agreement.

Operative part of the judgment

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Roser Noguer Enríquez, TB, Successors d’Higini Cierco García, SA and Cierco Martínez 2 2003, SL, are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.
Order of the General Court of 10 July 2020 — KF v SatCen

(Case T-619/19) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Staff of SatCen - Members of the contract staff - Jurisdiction of the EU Courts - Common foreign and security policy - Decision to launch administrative investigations in respect of the applicant pursuant to a judgment of the General Court - Acts adversely affecting an official - Claim for interest on a sum awarded by the General Court as compensation for the harm suffered - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly inadmissible)

(2020/C 348/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KF (represented by: N. Macaulay, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Satellite Centre (represented by: A. Guillerme, lawyer)

Re:

Application, first, based on Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the decision of the Director of SatCen of 3 July 2019 to launch investigations concerning the applicant and, second, based on Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant, in particular as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. KF shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union.

4. Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2020 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-241/19) (1)

(2021/C 53/86)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2020 — DS and Others v Commission and EEAS

(Case T-573/19) (1)

(2021/C 9/49)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 2 July 2021 — Bourel and Others v Commission

(Case T-777/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Construction of wind farms - Individual aid measures granted by France to several marine wind farms - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Start of work - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 338/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: David Bourel (Pléneuf-Val-André, France) and five other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Le Berre, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and A. Bouchagiar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, inter alia, suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 5498 final of 26 July 2019 by which the Commission decided not to raise objections to aid granted to several marine wind farms which was notified by the French Republic.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 16 February 2021 — Ungureanu v Commission

(Case T-753/19) (1)

(Action for damages - Law governing the institutions - Alleged unlawfulness stemming from the failure to bring an action for a declaration of a failure to fulfil obligations under Article 258 TFEU - Discretionary power of the Commission - Action manifestly inadmissible)

(2021/C 148/23)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Simeda Ungureanu (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) (represented by: R. Chiriţă, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and M. Carpus Carcea, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the infringement by the Commission of its obligation to ensure that Romania complies with the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Simeda Ungureanu shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 October 2021 — Teva v Commission and EMA

(Case T-628/19) (1)

(2021/C 513/53)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 August 2021 — Essentra and Others v Commission

(Case T-470/19) (1)

(2021/C 462/73)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2022 — Rigid Plastic Containers Finance and RPC Pisces Holdings v Commission

(Case T-781/19) (1)

(2023/C 45/60)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2022 — FV v Council

(Case T-542/19) (1)

(2022/C 340/77)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2020 — Tartu Agro v Commission

(Case T-150/20 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

(2020/C 329/33)

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Applicant: Tartu Agro AS (Tartu, Estonia) (represented by: T. Järviste, T. Kaurov, M. Valberg and M. Peetsalu, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and E. Randvere, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking to suspend the operation of Commission Decision C(2020) 252 final of 24 January 2020 on State aid SA.39182 (2017/C) (ex 2017/NN) (ex 2014/CP) granted by the Republic of Estonia to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.

2. The order of 30 March 2020, Tartu Agro v Commission (T-150/20 R), is set aside.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 November 2020 — Moloko Beverage v EUIPO — Nexus Liquids (moloko)

(Case T-383/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 19/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Moloko Beverage GmbH (Göppingen, Germany) (represented by: D. Wieland, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nexus Liquids GmbH (Bad Salzuflen, Germany) (represented by: F. Schembecker, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2020 (Case R 1485/2019-5), relating to cancellation proceedings between Nexus Liquids and Moloko Beverage.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.

2. Moloko Beverage GmbH and Nexus Liquids GmbH shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 September 2020 — Kahimbi Kasagwe v Council

(Case T-108/20) (1)

(2020/C 378/58)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 December 2020 — Ighoga Region 10 v Commission

(Case T-161/20) (1)

(State aid - Construction of a convention centre and hotel in Ingolstadt - Complaint - Action for failure to act - Adoption of a position putting an end to the failure to act - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 62/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Interessengemeinschaft der Hoteliers und Gastronomen Region 10 eV (Ighoga Region 10) (Ingolstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. Bartosch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 265 TFEU for a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to adopt a final decision closing the preliminary examination procedure concerning the alleged State aid scheme SA.48582 (2017/FC) implemented by Germany in favour of the Maritim Group and KHI Immobilien GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Interessengemeinschaft der Hoteliers und Gastronomen Region 10 eV (Ighoga Region 10).

(1) OJ C 175, 25.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 1 December 2020 — Tikal Marine Systems v EUIPO — Ultra Safety Systems (Tikal Tef-Gel)

(Case T-185/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 35/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tikal Marine Systems GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany) (represented by: M. Mahnkopf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ultra Safety Systems Inc. (Magonia Park, Florida, United States) (represented by: C. Eckhartt, A. von Mühlendahl and P. Böhner, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2020 (Case R 2500/2018-4), relating to cancellation proceedings between Ultra Safety Systems and Tikal Marine Systems.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Tikal Marine Systems GmbH and Ultra Safety Systems Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Symrise v ECHA

(Case T-656/20 R)

(Application for interim relief - REACH - Homosalate substance - Compliance check of registrations - Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 148/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Symrise AG (Holzminden, Germany) (represented by: R. Cana, E. Mullier and H. Widemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: W. Broere, N. Knight and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures seeking, first, suspension of the implementation of Decision A-009-2018 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 18 August 2020, relating to the applicant’s registration dossier for homosalate and, second, extension of the prescribed period to communicate the results of the tests for the duration of the suspension.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — JD v EIB

(Case T-166/20) (1)

(2021/C 88/63)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 April 2021 — Kühne v Parliament

(Case T-486/20 R)

(Application for interim relief - Civil service - Officials - Reassignment - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Application for interim measures - No prima facie case)

(2021/C 242/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Verena Kühne (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Schmechel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Darie and B. Schäfer, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures (i) suspending the operation of the decision of the Parliament of 2 July 2020 reassigning the applicant to the European Parliament’s liaison office in Luxembourg (Luxembourg) with effect from 1 September 2020 and (ii) maintaining the applicant’s employment in her current post at the European Parliament’s liaison office in Berlin or other measures appropriate for maintaining the status quo in the interim pending the decision on the substance.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.

2. The order of 4 September 2020, Kühne v Parliament (T-468/20 R), is revoked.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 March 2021 — UPL Europe and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v EFSA

(Case T-162/20) (1)

(2021/C 182/91)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Order of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Birkenstock Sales v EUIPO (Wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe)

(Case T-365/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for an EU trade mark consisting in wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 297/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Birkenstock Sales GmbH (Linz am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: C. Menebröcker and K. Middelhoff, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2020 (Case R 1706/2019-1), concerning an application for registration of a sign consisting in wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Birkenstock Sales GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 May 2021 — MP v Commission

(Case T-588/20) (1)

(2021/C 263/49)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 414, 30.11.2020.
Order of the General Court of 10 August 2021 — Jakeliūnas v ESMA

(Case T-760/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for failure to act - Request to launch an inquiry - Refusal of the President of ESMA - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility - Application for an injunction - Lack of jurisdiction)

(2021/C 412/11)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties

Applicant: Stasys Jakeliūnas (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: R. Paukštė, lawyer)

Defendant: European Securities and Markets Authority (represented by: G. Filippa, F. Barzanti and E. Siracusa, acting as Agents)

Re:

In essence, application, first, under Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that ESMA unlawfully refrained from launching an inquiry in respect of the infringement of Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) (OJ 2003 L 96, p. 16) and, second, under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the letter of the President of ESMA of 20 October 2020 refusing to launch that inquiry.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr. Stasys Jakeliūnas shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 72, 1.3.2021.