ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the President of the General Court of 11 November 2019 — Intering and Others v Commission

(Case T-525/19 RII)

(Interim measures - Programme entitled ‘EU Support to clean air in Kosovo’ - Tendering procedure EuropeAid/140043/DH/WKS/XK - Decision rejecting the suspension of operation of the decision to exclude an applicant from the further tendering procedure - New application for interim measures - Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 27/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Intering Sh.p.k (Obiliq, Kosovo), Steinmüller Engineering GmbH (Gummersbach, Germany), Deling d.o.o. za proizvodnju, promet i usluge (Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina), ZM-Vikom d.o.o. za proizvodnju, konstruckcije i montažu (Šibenik, Croatia) (represented by: R. Spielhofen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Bertelmann, J. Estrada de Solà and M. Kellerbauer, Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court seeking the suspension of operation of the decision of the European Commission of 29 June 2019 on the exclusion of the applicant from the further tendering procedure and its non-inclusion on the short list in connection with a procedure for the award of a contract under a programme entitled ‘EU Support to clean air in Kosovo’ to reduce dust and NOx emissions at TPP Kosovo B, Units B1 and B2 (EuropeAid/140043/DH/WKS/XK).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1) Dismisses the application for interim measures.
Order of the General Court of 24 October 2019 — United Kingdom v Commission

(Case T-188/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Research and technological development and space - Seventh framework programme of the Union - Audit - Failure to fill out work timesheets - Personnel costs declared ineligible - Decision of the Commission to adopt the audit report as final - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 432/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Brandon and Z. Lavery, Agents, and by T. Johnston and J. Scott, Barristers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, A. Kyratsou and M. Siekierzyńska, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 272 TFEU seeking a declaration that, in adopting as final the Final Audit Report, bearing reference number 14-BA 226-013 concerning the implementation of the Combine, EUFAR and THOR grant agreements the beneficiary of which is the Met Office, the national meteorological service attached, within the United Kingdom Government, to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the Commission failed correctly to interpret and apply the contractual provisions relating to those projects.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — KF v SatCen

(Case T-619/19 R)

(Decision to launch administrative investigation - Application for suspension of a decision - Application for interim measures - Inadmissibility - No urgency)

(2020/C 87/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KF (represented by: Ms A. Kunst, lawyer, and Mr N. Macaulay, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Satellite Centre (represented by: A. Guillerme, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of the decision of the Director of SatCen of 3 July 2019 to reopen an administrative investigation against KF.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed;
Order of the General Court of 20 December 2019 — Dragomir v Commission

(Case T-297/19) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Rule of law - Independence of the judiciary - Right to a fair trial - Protection of personal data - Failure by the Commission to adopt measures to ensure that Romania fulfils its obligations - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 61/56)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Daniel Dragomir (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: R. Chiriță, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and H. Stancu, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the Commission’s failure to fulfil its obligations to ensure that Romania respects the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the right to a fair trial and of the Commission’s failure to fulfil its obligations relating to the protection of personal data.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Daniel Dragomir shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
Order of the General Court of 12 March 2020 — Le Comité de Douzelage de Houffalize v Commission and EACEA

(Case T-236/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Europe for Citizens Programme (2014-2020) - Call for applications ‘Town Twinning 2017, second deadline’ (EACEA 36/2014) - Decision of the EACEA rejecting the applicant’s application for failure to meet the eligibility criteria - Commission’s decision rejecting the administrative action relating to the EACEA’s decision - Application submitted by a de facto association - Capacity to be party to legal proceedings - No evidence of legal existence - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 175/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Le Comité de Douzelage de Houffalize (Houffalize, Belgium) (represented by: A. Kettels, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission and the ‘Education, Audiovisual and Culture’ Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented by: H. Monet and N. Durand, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU for annulment or variation, first, of the EACEA’s decision of 25 June 2018 rejecting the applicant’s application for a grant in respect of its call for applications ‘Town Twinning 2017, second deadline’ (EACEA 36/2014) and, secondly, of Commission Implementing Decision C (2019) 572 final of 4 February 2019, rejecting the administrative action brought by the applicant under Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (OJ 2003 L 11, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. There is no need to rule on the objection of inadmissibility raised by the ‘Education, Audiovisual and Culture’ Executive Agency (EACEA).

3. There is no need to rule on the EACEA’s application for leave to intervene.

4. Le Comité du Douzelage de Houffalize shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and the EACEA, with the exception of those relating to the application for leave to intervene.

5. The EACEA shall bear its own costs in relation to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 5 March 2020 — HB v Commission

(Case T-796/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public service contracts - Irregularities in the contract award procedure - Recovery of sums already paid - Debit note - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

(2020/C 137/80)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: HB (represented by: M. Vandenbussche and L. Levi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, J. Estrada de Solà and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 7318 final of 15 October 2019 to reduce the amounts due under contract TACIS/2006/101-510 and to recover the amounts unduly paid.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Lucaccioni v Commission

(Case T-308/19) (1)

(Action for annulment and for compensation - Civil service - Non actionable measure - Preparatory measure - No claim - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part inadmissible)

(2020/C 222/27)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Arnaldo Lucaccioni (San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy) (represented by: E. Bonanni, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Commission’s decision of 11 January 2019 on the mandate of a new medical committee in the context of a request made by the applicant for recognition of aggravation of an occupational disease and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1) The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, inadmissible.

2) Mr Arnaldo Lucaccioni shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 9 March 2020 — Republic of Cyprus v EUIPO — Filotas Bellas & Yios (Halloumi Vermion)

(Case T-60/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation of the trade mark on which the application for a declaration of invalidity is based - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 191/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Filotas Bellas & Yios AE (Alexandreia, Greece)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 November 2018 (Case R 2296/2017-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Filotas Bellas & Yios.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Republic of Cyprus shall bear the costs.

(1) OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Perfect Bar v EUIPO (PERFECT BAR)

(Case T-553/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark PERFECT BAR - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision - Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 287/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Perfect Bar LLC (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: F. Miazzetto, J.L. Gracia Albero, R. Seoane Lacayo and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2019 (Case R 371/2019-5), relating to the application for registration of the word sign PERFECT BAR as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. Dismisses the action as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Orders Perfect Bar LLC to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2020 — UPL Europe and Aceto Agricultural Chemicals v Commission

(Case T-612/19) (1)

(2020/C 262/53)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 3 August 2020 — Inova Semiconductors v EUIPO — Venta Servicio LED (ISELED)

(Case T-604/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Renunciation of the EU designation under an international registration - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 371/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Inova Semiconductors GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmidpeter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Venta Servicio LED, SL (Martorell, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 June 2019 (Case R 2149/2018-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Venta Servicio LED and Inova Semiconductors.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.

2. Inova Semiconductors GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Koopman International v EUIPO — Tinnus Enterprises and Mystic Products (fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-840/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Suspension of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 348/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by G. van den Bergh and B. Brouwer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by A. Odle, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the provisional decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 September 2019 (Case R 1008/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mystic Products Import & Export and Koopman International, on the one hand, and Tinnus Enterprises, on the other hand.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Koopman International BV shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Tinnus Enterprises LLC.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Order of the President of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — Leonardo v Frontex

(Case T-849/19 R II)

(Interim measures - Public service contracts - Application for interim measures - New application - New facts - Lack of urgency)

(2021/C 28/79)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Leonardo SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Esposito, F. Caccioppoli and G. Calamo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: H. Caniard, C. Georgiadis, A. Gras and S. Drew, Agents, and by M. Vanderstraeten, F. Biebuyck and V. Ost, lawyers)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures for a stay of execution of the contract notice FRONTEX/OP/888/2019/JL/CG, published on 18 October 2019 by Frontex, entitled ‘Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) for Medium Altitude Long Endurance Maritime Aerial Surveillance’, and the acts included in the annex, the Notices for changes or additional information, the questions and answers published by Frontex under the lex specialis, the minutes of the Informative Meeting held at Frontex’s premises on 28 October 2019, the contract award decision, and any other prior, associated or subsequent act.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 September 2020 — Sky v EUIPO — Safran Electronics & Defense (SKYNAUTE by SAGEM)

(Case T-523/19) (1)

(2020/C 390/70)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 305, 9.9.2019.
Order of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Graanhandel P. van Schelven v Commission

(Case T-306/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Agricultural policy - Organic production - Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 - Production and labelling of organic products - Organic products imported into the European Union - Certification of products by a control body - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 206/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV (Nieuwe-Tonge, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Almeida, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi, A. Dawes and B. Hofstötter, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Article 1(3) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/446 of 19 March 2019 amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries (OJ 2019 L 77, p. 67), in so far as that provision, in conjunction with point 3 of Annex II to that implementing regulation, withdraws the recognition of Control Union Certifications as a competent body for carrying out controls and issuing certificates of inspection authorising the placing on the EU market, as organic products, of products imported from Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. There is no need to rule on the applications for measures of organisation of procedure and for the examination of witnesses submitted by Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV.

3. Graanhandel P. van Schelven shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 280, 19.8.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 December 2020 — IM v EIB

(Case T-872/19) (1)

(Action for damages - Institutional law - Position of Chief Executive of the EIF - Vacancy notice - Rejection of the applicant’s application - Lack of autonomy of remedies - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 62/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: IM (represented by: D. Giabbani, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, G. Faedo and M. Loizou, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following the decisions of 3 and 9 October 2019 by which the EIB rejected his application for the position of Chief Executive of the European Investment Fund (EIF).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

2. Orders IM to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 24 September 2021 — Pilatus Bank v ECB

(Case T-139/19) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Withdrawal of licence - Tasks conferred on the ECB - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 471/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pilatus Bank plc (Ta’Xbiex, Malta) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: A. Karpf, E. Yoo and M. Puidokas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the ECB’s decision of 21 December 2018 declaring to the applicant that it was no longer competent to ensure its direct prudential supervision and to take measures concerning it.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Pilatus Bank plc shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 August 2021 — Imagina Media Audiovisual v Commission

(Case T-269/19) (1)

(2021/C 422/51)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Synthomer v Commission

(Case T-457/19) (1)

(2022/C 432/46)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 December 2021 — HS v Commission

(Case T-848/19) (1)

(2022/C 95/63)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 April 2020 — Intertranslations (Intertransleïsions) Metafraseis v Parliament

(Case T-20/20) (1)

(2020/C 201/73)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.
Order of the General Court of 6 October 2020 — Sharpston v Council and Representatives of the Governments of the Member States

(Case T-550/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union - Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States to appoint an Advocate General to the Court of Justice - Act not open to challenge - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 433/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Eleanor Sharpston (Schoenfels, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Forwood, Barrister, and J. Flynn QC)

Defendants: Council of the European Union and Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and A. Sikora-Kalėda, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Decision (EU) 2020/1251 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 2 September 2020 appointing three Judges and an Advocate General to the Court of Justice (OJ 2020 L 292, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the appointment of Mr Athanasios Rantos to the post of Advocate General at the Court of Justice.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Eleanor Sharpston shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief before the General Court and the Court of Justice in Cases T-550/20 R, C-423/20 P(R) and C-424/20 P(R).

(1) OJ C 348, 10.10.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 August 2020 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-8/20) (1)

(2020/C 371/35)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.