ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Case C-85/18 PPU: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Oradea — Romania) — CV v DU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Child custody — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Articles 8, 10 and 13 — Concept of ‘habitual residence’ of a child — Judgment delivered by a court of another Member State concerning the place of residence of a child — Wrongful removal or retention — Jurisdiction in cases of child abduction)

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Oradea — Romania) — CV v DU

(Case C-85/18 PPU) ( 1 )

‛(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Child custody — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Articles 8, 10 and 13 — Concept of ‘habitual residence’ of a child — Judgment delivered by a court of another Member State concerning the place of residence of a child — Wrongful removal or retention — Jurisdiction in cases of child abduction)’

Referring court

Judecătoria Oradea

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CV

Respondent: DU

Operative part of the order

Article 10 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, and Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations, must be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which a child who was habitually resident in a Member State was wrongfully removed by one of the parents to another Member State, the courts of that other Member State do not have jurisdiction to rule on an application relating to custody or the determination of a maintenance allowance with respect to that child, in the absence of any indication that the other parent consented to his removal or did not bring an application for the return of that child.

( 1 ) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie v C and J, S v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

(Case C-269/18 PPU) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection - Directive 2013/32/EU - Article 46(6) and (8) - Manifestly unfounded application for international protection - Right to an effective remedy - Authorisation to remain in the territory of a Member State - Directive 2008/115/EC - Articles 2, 3 and 15 - Illegal stay - Detention))

(2018/C 341/03)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, J, S

Respondents: C, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Operative part of the order

Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals and Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection must be interpreted as meaning that a third-country national, whose application for international protection has been rejected at first instance by the competent administrative authority as being manifestly unfounded, cannot be detained with a view to his removal, in the case where, in accordance with Article 46(6) and (8) of Directive 2013/32, he is lawfully authorised to remain on the national territory until a decision has been taken on his action relating to the right to remain on that territory pending the ruling on the appeal brought against the decision which rejected his application for international protection.

(1) OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.
Case C-57/18: Order of the President of the Court of 17 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — AX v BW

Order of the President of the Court of 17 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — AX v BW

(Case C-57/18) ( 1 )

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Almería — Spain) — Banco Popular Español S.A. v María Angeles Díaz Soria, Miguel Ángel Góngora Gómez, José Antonio Sánchez González, Dolores María del Águila Andújar

(Case C-232/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 27 July 2018 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-36/18) (1)

(2018/C 399/40)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Vereniging Gasopslag Nederland, TAQA Onshore BV, TAQA Piek Gas BV v Autoriteit Consument en Markt, other party: Gas Transport Services BV

(Case C-399/18) (1)

(2019/C 172/33)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 11 December 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Austria, supported by: French Republic

(Case C-79/18) (1)

(2019/C 103/23)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 5 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — Bulgarian Air Charter Limited v NE

(Case C-758/18) (1)

(2019/C 280/48)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Farmland Kft. v Földművelésügyi Miniszter

(Case C-489/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Direct support schemes - Single payment scheme - Single area payment application - Criteria - Lawful user of agricultural land)

(2019/C 172/05)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Farmland Kft.

Defendant: Földművelésügyi Miniszter

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Administrative and Labour Court, Budapest, Hungary), by decision of 17 July 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 381, 22.10.2018.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Haskovo — Bulgaria) — SZ v Mitnitsa Burgas

(Case C-652/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union - Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 - Article 3(1) - Infringement of the obligation to declare - Article 9(1) - Penalties provided for by national law - National legislation - Fine and confiscation of the undeclared sum by the State - Proportionality)

(2019/C 423/23)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad — Haskovo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SZ

Defendant: Mitnitsa Burgas

in the presence of: Okrazhna prokuratura — Haskovo

Operative part of the order

Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, for the purpose of penalising an infringement of the obligation to declare provided for in Article 3 of that regulation, provides that, in addition to the imposition of an administrative fine, the undeclared sum is to be confiscated by the State.

(1) OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 17 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias — Spain) — Unión Insular de CC.OO. de Lanzarote v Swissport Spain Aviation Services Lanzarote S.L.

(Case C-167/18) (1)

(2019/C 288/46)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 211, 18.6.2018.
Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 17 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Fédération des fabricants de cigares v Premier ministre, Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé

(Case C-517/18) (1)

(2020/C 68/44)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 16 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Roma — Italy) — Società Italiana degli Autori ed Editori (S.I.A.E.) v Soundreef Ltd

(Case C-781/18) (1)

(2020/C 19/43)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2020 — Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Papouis Dairies Ltd, Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon (POA) Dimosia Ltd, M.J. Dairies EOOD

(Joined Cases C-608/18 P, C-609/18 P and C-767/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Invalidity of the mark cited by the opposing party - Appeals which have become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 287/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, S. Baran, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, H. O’Neill and D. Botis, acting as Agents), Papouis Dairies Ltd (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros), Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon (POA) Dimosia Ltd (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros), M.J. Dairies EOOD (represented by: D. Dimitrova, advocate)

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the appeals.

2. The Republic of Cyprus shall pay the costs of the appeals.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Saint-Brieuc — Chambre détachée de Guingamp — France) — Procureur de la République v Tugdual Carluer, Yann Latouche, Dominique Legeard, Thierry Leleu, Dimitri Pinschof, Brigitte Plunian, Rozenn Marechal

(Case C-115/18) (1)

(2020/C 77/48)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain, supported by: French Republic

(Case C-165/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Order of the President of the Court of 14 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Veneto Latte Scrl and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA), Regione Veneto

(Case C-339/18) (1)

(2020/C 320/26)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 October 2019 — Andrew Clarke v European Commission

(Case C-284/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Action for annulment - Actions for failure to act - Refusal of the European Commission to bring infringement proceedings under Article 258 TFEU against a Member State)

(2019/C 423/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Andrew Clarke (represented by: E. Lock, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2. Mr Andrew Clarke shall pay his own costs.

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — XW v Eurowings GmbH

(Case C-541/19) (1)

(2020/C 137/68)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 13 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Erding — Germany) — E. M., M. S. v Eurowings GmbH

(Case C-414/19) (1)

(2020/C 68/49)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln — Germany) — FZ v DER Touristik GmbH

(Case C-153/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 12 - Package tour - Long delay of a flight - Passengers’ compensation - Additional compensation - Passenger’s right to a reduction in the price of the journey)

(2020/C 287/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: FZ

Defendant: DER Touristik GmbH

Operative part of the order

Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as not precluding a passenger who has already been compensated under Article 7 of that regulation, from being compensated under a right to a reduction in the price of the journey available to him or her against a tour operator, provided for by the law of the Member State concerned, in so far as that compensation is granted for a loss that is specific to that individual passenger arising from one of the situations provided for in Article 1(1) of that regulation, which it is for the national court to determine.

(1) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Raggio di Sole Società Cooperativa Onlus v Comune di Ostuni, Consorzio per L'Inclusione Sociale dell'Ats Fasano — Ostuni — Cisternino, interested party: La Scintilla Soc. Coop. Soc.

(Case C-110/19) (1)

(2020/C 137/64)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 20 January 2020 — Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission, Council of the European Union

(Case C-205/19 P) (1)

(2020/C 313/29)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — PAGE International Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-630/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Deduction of input tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 168 and 176 - Exclusion from the right to deduct - Acquisition of food services - Standstill clause - Accession to the European Union)

(2020/C 304/02)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PAGE International Lda

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the order

Article 168(a) and Article 176 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, after the accession of the Member State concerned to the European Union, reduces the scope of expenditure excluded from the right to deduct value added tax by authorising, under certain conditions, partial deduction of value added tax on such expenses, including inter alia those relating to food, even where the taxable person asserts that those expenses were entirely assigned to the exercise of his or her taxable economic activity.

(1) OJ C 389, 11.11.2019.
Order of the President of the Court of 14 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Latte Villafranca Scrl and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA), Regione Veneto

(Case C-464/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/36)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 12 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — TUIfly GmbH v EUflight.de GmbH

(Case C-792/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/45)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘OC Finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

(Case C-945/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/43)

Language of the case: Latvian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien — Austria) — proceedings brought by S.A.D. Maler und Anstreicher OG

(Case C-256/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU - Effective judicial protection in the areas covered by EU law - Principle of judicial independence - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Jurisdiction of the Court - Article 267 TFEU - Admissibility - National provisions relating to the allocation of cases in a court or tribunal - Remedy - Interpretation necessary to enable the referring court to give judgment - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 329/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

S.A.D. Maler und Anstreicher OG

Intervening parties: Magistrat der Stadt Wien, Bauarbeiter Urlaubs- und Abfertigungskasse

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Vienna Administrative Court, Austria), by decision of 27 February 2019, is inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid — Spain) — ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA

(Case C-716/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Competition - Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restrictive of competition - Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and established - Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 44/14)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET

Defendant: Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid (Commercial Court No 2, Madrid, Spain) by decision of 29 July 2019 is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 423, 16.12.2019.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — FP Passenger Service GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG

(Case C-654/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights - Right to compensation in the event of delay - Length of delay - Time of opening of the aircraft’s doors at destination - Actual arrival time - Scheduled time of arrival - Question on which the Court has already ruled or where the answer to such a question may be clearly deduced from the case-law)

(2020/C 423/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Korneuburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: FP Passenger Service GmbH

Defendant: Austrian Airlines AG

Operative part of the order

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, read in the light of the judgment of 4 September 2014, Germanwings (C-452/13, EU:C:2014:2141), must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of determining the extent of the delay suffered by passengers on a flight on arrival, it is necessary to calculate the time between the scheduled time of arrival and the actual arrival time, that is to say, the moment when at least one of the doors of the aircraft is opened, it being understood that, at that moment, the passengers are permitted to leave it.

(1) OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.
Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 26 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Montreuil — France) — Bank of China Limited v Ministre de l’Action and des Comptes publics

(Case C-737/19) (1)

(2021/C 182/65)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.