ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 366/35

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2012 — EDF v Commission

(Case T-389/12 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Concentrations - Electricity market - Decision authorising a concentration operation subject to compliance with certain commitments - Refusal to grant the postponement of the deadline set for fulfilling those commitments - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

2012/C 366/71

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Électricité de France (EDF) (Paris (France)) (represented by: A. Creus Carreras and A. Valiente Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and S. Noë, Agents)

Re:

Application for interim measures in relation to Commission Decision C(2012) 4617 final of 28 June 2012 refusing to grant the applicant the postponement of the deadline fixed for fulfilling some of its commitments set out in Decision C(2009) 9059 of 12 November 2009, which authorises the concentration operation whereby Électricité de France was to acquire exclusive control of the assets of Segebel (Case COMP/M.5549 — EDF/Segebel).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 399/23

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2012 — Bäßler v OHIM (MAX)

(Case T-187/12)

(Application - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 399/43

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Uwe Bäßler (Gmunden, Austria) (represented by: L. Müller, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 February 2012 (Case R 0909/2011-1), concerning an application for registration of the word mark MAX as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action as inadmissible.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 46/18

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 — Vakili v Council

(Case T-255/12) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Iran in order to prevent nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 46/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bahman Vakili (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: J.-M. Thouvenin, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and I. Rodios, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2001 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11) and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1),, insofar as those acts concern the applicant, and of the decision contained in the Council’s letter of 23 March 2012.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application.

2. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs incurred by Mr Bahman Vakili and bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 258, 25.8.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/49

Order of the General Court of 20 November 2012 — Geipel v OHIM — Reeh (BEST BODY NUTRITION)

(Case T-138/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 26/98

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Yves Geipel (Auerbach, Germany) (represented by: J. Sachs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and R. Pethke, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Jörg Reeh (Buxtehude, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2012 (Case R 2433/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Jörg Reeh and Yves Geipel.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 157, 2.6.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 164/17

Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals and Others v Council

(Case T-28/12) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Adoption of a new regulation - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 164/32

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals (Kabil-Batam, Indonesia); Ecogreen Oleochemials (Singapore) Pte Ltd, (Singapore, Singapore); and Ecogreen Oleochemicals GmbH (Dessau-Roβlau, Germany) (represented by: F. Graafsma and J. Cornelis, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, Agent, and by G. Berrisch and N. Chesaites, lawyers)

Re:

Application for the annulment in part of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 of 8 November 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia (OJ 2011 L 293, p. 1), in so far as it imposes an anti-dumping duty on PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH and Sasol Germany GmbH.

3. The Council of the European Union shall bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals, Ecogreen Oleochemials (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Ecogreen Oleochemicals GmbH.

4. Sasol Olefins & Surfactants and Sasol Germany shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 101/18

Order of the General Court of 7 February 2013 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (Ubee Interactive)

(Case T-407/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Opposition withdrawn - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 101/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ubee Interactive Corp. (Jhubei City, Taiwan) (represented by: M. Nentwig, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Augere Holdings (Netherlands) BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 July 2012 (Case R 1849/2011-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Augere Holdings (Netherlands) BV and Ubee Interactive Corp.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/24

Order of the General Court of 12 September 2013 — Yaqub v OHIM — Turkey (ATATURK)

(Case T-580/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Appointment of a new representative - Applicant’s failure to act - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 336/52

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: J. Yaqub (Nottingham, United Kingdom)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court, being: Republic of Turkey

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 September 2012 (Case R 2613/2011-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between the Republic of Turkey, and J. Yaqub and G. Yaqub.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the application.

2. J. Yaqub shall bear his own costs.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/83

Order of the General Court of 3 June 2013 — bachmaier v OHIM — (oto-soft)

(Case T-550/12) (1)

2013/C 225/190

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/44

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2013 — Refrigue-confecções para o frio v OHIM — Sixty International (Refrigue for cold)

(Case T-511/12) (1)

2014/C 45/79

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 38, 9.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 367/28

Order of the General Court of 24 October 2013 — Stromberg Menswear v OHIM — Leketoy Stormberg Inter (STORMBERG)

(Case T-457/12) (1)

(Community trade mark - Community word mark STORMBERG - Appeal against the request for conversion of a Community trade mark into national trade mark applications - Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 367/51

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Stromberg Menswear Ltd (Leeds, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Tsoutsanis, lawyer, and C. Tulley, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Leketoy Stormberg Inter AS (Kristiansand S, Norway) (represented initially by T. Mølsgaard, and subsequently by J. Løje, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 August 2012 (Case R 428/2012-4), relating to the request for conversion of a Community trade mark into national trade mark applications submitted by Leketoy Stormberg Inter AS.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Stromberg Menswear Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/29

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — Wedi v OHIM — Mehlhose Bauelemente für Dachrand + Fassade (BALCO)

(Case T-541/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 184/50

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Wedi GmbH (Emsdetten, Germany) (represented by: O. Bischof, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially A. Pohlmann, then A. Schifko, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Mehlhose Bauelemente für Dachrand + Fassade GmbH & Co. KG (Herford, Germany) (represented by: M. Wirtz, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 September 2012 (Case R 2255/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Mehlhose Bauelemente für Dachrand + Fassade GmbH & Co. KG and Wedi GmbH.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the defendant shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 46, 16.2.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/33

Order of the General Court of 6 February 2014 — Duff Beer v OHIM — Twentieth Century Fox Film (Duff)

(Case T-87/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 112/43

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Duff Beer UG (haftungsbeschränkt) (Eschwege, Germany) (represented by: N. Schindler, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: S. Böttger and M. Koch, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 December 2011 (Case R 456/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Duff Beer UG (haftungsbeschränkt).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 462/32

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2014 — Siegenia-Aubi and Noraa v Commission

(Case T-257/12) (1)

(2014/C 462/45)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/50

Order of the General Court of 19 June 2014 — Suwaid v Council

(Case T-268/12) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Syria - Lack of representation - Applicant’s failure to act - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 315/84

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Joseph Suwaid (Damascus, Syria) (represented: initially by L. Defalque and T. Bontinck, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and V. Piessevaux, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of point A 7 of Annex I to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 266/2012 of 23 March 2012 implementing Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2012 L 87, p. 45), and of point A 7 of Annex I to Council Implementing Decision 2012/172/CFSP of 23 March 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2012 L 87, p. 103), in so far as those acts included the applicant on the list of persons subject to restrictive measures.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Mr Joseph Suwaid shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 314/35

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2016 — British Telecommunications v Commission

(Case T-456/12) (1)

(2016/C 314/47)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/42

Order of the General Court of 5 March 2015 — Générations futures v Commission

(Case T-458/12) (1)

(2015/C 146/56)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 389, 15.12.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 298/11

Order of the General Court of 14 August 2013 — Nordex Holding v OHIM — Fontana Food (Taverna MEDITERRANEAN WHITE CHEESE)

(Case T-301/13) (1)

2013/C 298/20

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 141/19

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 March 2013 — Communicaid Group v Commission

(Case T-4/13 R)

(Interim measures - Public services contracts - Tendering procedure - Language training services - Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer - Application for suspension of operation and interim measures - Loss of opportunity - Lack of serious and irreparable damage - Lack of urgency)

2013/C 141/34

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Communicaid Group Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Brennan, Solicitor, F. Randolph QC and M. Gray, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and S. Lejeune, Agents, and by P. Wytinck, lawyer)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of decisions of the Commission rejecting the tenders submitted by the applicant in respect of several lots in a call for tenders relating to framework contracts for the provision of language training to staff of the institutions, bodies and agencies of the European Union in Brussels (Belgium) and, further, for an order prohibiting the Commission from entering into contracts for the lots at issue with the successful tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/17

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-229/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Action dismissed at first instance as manifestly inadmissible - The application lodged by fax and the original subsequently received not the same - Original application lodged out of time - Action out of time - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2014/C 15/25

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 21 February 2013 in Case F-113/11 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 344/56

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 September 2013 — Tilly-Sabco v Commission

(Case T-397/13 R)

(Interim measures - Agriculture - Export refunds - Poultrymeat - Regulation fixing the refunds at zero - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2013/C 344/100

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Tilly-Sabco (Guerlesquin, France) (represented by: R. Milchior and F. Le Roquais, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. de Bergues, D. Colas and C. Candat, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for stay of execution of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 of 18 July 2013 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat (OJ 2013 L 196, p. 13).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 January 2014 — MHCS v OHIM — Compañía Vinícola del Norte de España (ICE IMPERIAL)

(Case T-555/13) (1)

(2014/C 71/53)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 377, 21.12.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/45

Order of the General Court of 25 November 2013 — Euromed v OHIM — DC Druck-Chemie (EUROSIL)

(Case T-523/13) (1)

2014/C 45/83

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/52

Order of the General Court of 1 April 2014 — Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance v Commission

(Case T-145/13) (1)

2014/C 175/72

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27. 4. 2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 142/55

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — Fard and Sarkandi v Council

(Case T-439/13) (1)

2014/C 142/72

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/58

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2014 — Gemeente Bergen op Zoom v Commission

(Case T-641/13) (1)

2014/C 303/69

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 194/38

Order of the General Court of 28 April 2014 — Omega v OHIM — Omega Engineering (Ω OMEGA)

(Case T-175/13) (1)

2014/C 194/53

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/53

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — SCA Hygiène Products v Commission

(Case T-232/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/90

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: SCA Hygiène Products (Tremblay-en-France) (represented by: J.-M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid-Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. SCA Hygiène Products is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/52

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte v Commission

(Case T-223/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/87

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG (Minden, Germany) (represented by: H. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.