ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Microsemi Europe and Microsemi v Commission

(Case T-227/18) (1)

(2019/C 328/87)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.
Order of the General Court of 20 May 2019 — Phreneos and Others v Commission

(Case T-715/18) (1)

(Public supply contracts - Tender procedure - Planning, preparation, promotion and implementation of the event ‘European Development Days’ - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer - Annulment of the procurement procedure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 246/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Phrenos SPRL (Mont-sur-Marchienne, Belgium), Akkanto, (Watermael-Boitsfort, Belgium), Operational Management Solutions (Chaumont Gistoux, Belgium) (represented by: R. Jafferali and R. van Melsen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu, J. Estrada de Solà and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 27 November 2018 rejecting the tender submitted by the consortium formed by the applicants in the call for tenders EuropeAid/139729/DH/SER/BE relating to the planning, preparation, promotion and implementation of the ‘European Development Days’ event for its Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development, and awarding that contract to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings, with the exception of those relating to the application by Pomilio Blumm Srl for leave to intervene in the interlocutory proceedings.

3. Phrenos SPRL, Akkanto, Operational Management Solutions, the Commission and Pomilio Blumm shall bear their own costs relating to the application by Pomilio Blumm Srl for leave to intervene in the interlocutory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — VL and Others v Parliament

(Case T-183/18) (1)

(2019/C 423/85)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber, Extended Composition, has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2019 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-703/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - European Social Fund - Operational programme ‘Knowledge Education Development’ - Letter notifying a final audit report - Act not amenable to review - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 399/76)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Arenas and M. Siekierzyńska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFUE for the annulment of the decision of the Commission allegedly contained in its letter of 17 September 2018 notifying the Republic of Poland the final audit report relating to the operational programme ‘Knowledge Education Development’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. It is not necessary to adjudicate on the Czech Republic’s application to intervene.

3. The Republic of Poland and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

4. The Czech Republic shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 54, 11.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — WV v EEAS

(Case T-471/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Civil servants - Salary deductions - Unauthorised absences - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)

(2020/C 103/42)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: WV (represented by É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the EEAS’s decision of 27 November 2017 imposing a salary deduction amounting to 72 calendar days and, second, in so far as necessary, the EEAS’s decision of 2 May 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 3 January 2018.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded in law.

2. WV is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.
1.

The action is dismissed for having been brought before a court that has no jurisdiction to hear it.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Hexal v EMA

(Case C-549/18) (1)

(2021/C 138/69)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
Order of the General Court of 20 August 2020 — FL Brüterei M-V and Others v Commission

(Case T-755/18) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Organic farming - Livestock production - Exceptional production rules applicable in case of non-availability of organic farm inputs - Use of non-organic animals - Extension of the period of application of the exceptional production rules - Lack of direct concern - No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 371/09)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: FL Brüterei M-V GmbH (Finkenthal, Germany), Erdegut GmbH (Finkenthal), Ökofarm Groß Markow GmbH (Lelkendorf, Germany) (represented by: H. Schmidt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, B. Eggers and B. Hofstötter, acting as Agents)

Re:

In the first place, application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Article 1(4) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1584 of 22 October 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control (OJ 2018 L 264, p. 1), and, in the second place, application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for, first, the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the adoption of that article and, second, the harm allegedly suffered by FL Brüterei M-V as a result of the Commission’s failure to ensure compliance by the Dutch authorities with Article 42 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control (OJ 2008 L 250, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. FL Brüterei M-V GmbH, Erdegut GmbH and Ökofarm Groß Markow GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Deichmann v Commission

(Case T-131/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/53)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 May 2021 — Makhlouf v Commission and ECB

(Case T-260/18) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - Stability support programme for Cyprus - Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism - Applicant having ceased to reply to the Court’s requests - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 289/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Rami Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, T. Materne and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents), European Central Bank (represented by: O. Heinz, G. Várhelyi and P. Papapaschalis, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Mr Rami Makhlouf shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 1 July 2019 — Puigdemont i Casamajó and Comín i Oliveres v Parliament

(Case T-388/19 R)

(Application for interim measures - European Parliament - Verification of the credentials - No prima facie case)

(2019/C 363/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Puigdemont i Casamajó (Waterloo, Belgium) and Comín i Oliveres (Waterlo) (represented by: B. Bekaert, B. Emmerson, G. Boye and S. Bekaert, avocats)

Defendant: European Parliament

Re:

Application submitted under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, to suspend the implementation of various decisions of the European Parliament ordered to prevent the applicants from sitting in Parliament as elected members and, second, to direct Parliament to take all necessary measures, including a declaration of the applicants’ privileges and immunities, to enable them to sit in Parliament as from 2 July 2019

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 June 2019 — Hebberecht v EEAS

(Case T-171/19) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Suspension - Amounts withheld from remuneration - Failure to comply with the procedural requirements - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 255/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Chantal Hebberecht (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: K. Bicard, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the EEAS’s decision communicated to the applicant on 20 September 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint directed against the EEAS’s decision to suspend her from her duties and to withhold amounts from her monthly salary and, secondly, payment of compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Ms Chantal Hebberecht shall pay her own costs.

(1) OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.
Order of the President of the General Court of 2 October 2019 — FV v Council

(Case T-542/19 R)

(Interim relief - Civil service - Officials - Placing on leave and retirement in the interests of the service - Article 42c of the Staff Regulations - Application for a suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2019/C 423/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: FV (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the operation of the Council’s decision dated 3 May 2019 to place the applicant on leave in the interests of the service in accordance with Article 42c of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and having effect as of 31 December 2015.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim relief is dismissed.
Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-57/19) (1)

(Action for compensation - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Lack of competence)

(2019/C 399/79)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Rami Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by A. Jaume and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the adoption of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16) and its subsequent implementing acts, and as a result of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 of 17 May 2019 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2019 L 132, p. 36), in so far as those decisions concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Rami Makhlouf shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Jalkh v Parliament

(Case T-360/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - European Parliament legislative resolution - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 61/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-François Jalkh (Gretz-Armainvilliers, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z. Nagy and S. Lucente, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the European Parliament’s legislative resolution of 16 April 2019 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) as regards cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of OLAF investigations (COM(2018)0338 C8-0214/2018 2018J0170(COD).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Jean-François Jalkh shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 November 2019 — DK v GSA

(Case T-537/19) (1)

(2020/C 19/71)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2020 — Irish Wind Farmers’ Association and Others v Commission

(Case T-6/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Tax advantages granted by Ireland to fossil fuel producers - Letter from the Commission - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 103/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Irish Wind Farmers’ Association Clg (Kilkenny, Ireland), Carrons Windfarm Ltd (Shanagolden, Ireland), Foyle Windfarm Ltd (Dublin, Ireland), Greenoge Windfarm Ltd (Bunclody, Ireland) (represented by: M. Segura Catalán and M. Clayton, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Grønfeldt, K. Herrmann and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the Commission’s letter of 25 October 2018 concerning State aid allegedly granted by Ireland to fossil fuel producers.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 23 December 2019 — Mersinis v ESMA

(Case T-163/19) (1)

(2020/C 68/80)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 6 March 2020 — Nutravita v EUIPO — Pegaso (nutravita Healthy Mind, Body & Soul.)

(Case T-814/19) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 191/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nutravita Ltd (Maidenhead, United Kingdom) (represented by: H. Dhondt and J. Cassiman, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pegaso Srl (Negrar, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 September 2019 (Case R 80/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Pegaso Srl and Nutravita Ltd

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Nutravita Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 2 March 2020 — Datenlotsen Informationssysteme v Commission

(Case T-368/19) (1)

(State aid - Tax advantages and public financing - Complaint - Decision to open the formal investigation procedure - Action for failure to act - Adoption of a position by the Commission putting an end to the failure to act - Decision to close the formal investigation procedure - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 137/78)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Lübbig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 265 TFEU seeking a finding that the Commission, following the complaint lodged on 15 March 2012, unlawfully failed, within a reasonable time, to close the formal investigation procedure by adopting a decision under Article 108(2) TFEU or Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 [TFEU] (OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH.

(1) OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
Order of the General Court of 20 May 2020 — Nord Stream v Parliament and Council

(Case T-530/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Energy - Internal market in natural gas - Directive (EU) 2019/692 - Addition of Article 49a to Directive 2009/73/EC concerning the adoption of decisions derogating from certain provisions of that directive - Application of Directive 2009/73 to gas lines to or from third countries - Objection to the deadline of 24 May 2020 for granting derogations from the obligations laid down by Directive 2009/73 - No direct concern - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 247/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nord Stream AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Raible, C. von Köckritz and J. von Andreae, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by L. Visaggio, J. Etienne and I. McDowell, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Lo Monaco and S. Boelaert, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Directive (EU) 2019/692 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 amending Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas (OJ 2019 L 117, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Republic of Estonia, by the Republic of Latvia, by the Republic of Lithuania, by the Republic of Poland and by the European Commission.

3. Nord Stream AG is ordered to pay the costs of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union, except for those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

4. Nord Stream, the Parliament and the Council, as well as the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Poland and the Commission, are to bear their own costs in relation to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — SQlab v EUIPO (Innerbarend)

(Case T-307/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Innerbarend - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 201/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: SQlab GmbH (Taufkirchen, Germany) (represented by: A. Koelle, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2019 (Case R 2180/2018-4) relating to an application for registration of the word sign Innerbarend as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. SQlab GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.
Order of the General Court of 3 July 2020 — Tognoli and Others v Parliament

(Joined cases T-395/19, T-396/19, T-405/19, T-408/19, T-419/19, T-423/19, T-424/19, T-428/19, T-433/19, T-437/19, T-443/19, T-455/19, T-458/19 to T-462/19, T-464/19, T-469/19 and T-477/19) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Institutional law - Single statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions - Change in the amount of pensions - Manifestly inadmissible actions)

(2020/C 339/28)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Carlo Tognoli (Milan, Italy), and the 19 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented in cases T-395/19, T-396/19, T-419/19, T-423/19, T-424/19, T-428/19, T-433/19, T-437/19, T-455/19, T-458/19 to T-462/19, T-464/19, T-469/19 and T-477/19 by M. Merola, lawyer, and in cases T-405/19, T-408/19 and T-443/19 by M. Merola and L. Florio, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the letters of 11 April 2019 drawn up, in the case of each applicant, by the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements’ Unit of the Parliament’s Directorate General for Finance concerning the adjustment of the pensions they receive following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019 of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy).

Operative part of the order

1. The actions are rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Mr Tognoli and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 280, 19.8.2019.