ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/21

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Albergo Quattro Fontane Snc, (C-227/13 P), Hotel Gabrielli Srl, formerly Hotel Gabrielli Sandwirth SpA, (C-228/13 P), GE.AL.VE. Srl, (C-229/13 P), Metropolitan SpA, formerly Metropolitan Srl, (C-230/13 P), Hotel Concordia Srl, formerly Hotel Concordia Snc, (C-231/13 P), Società per l’industria alberghiera (SPLIA), (C-232/13 P), Principessa Srl, in liquidation, (C-233/13 P), Albergo Saturnia Internazionale SpA, (C-234/13 P), Savoia e Jolanda Srl, (C-235/13 P), Biasutti Hotels Srl, formerly Hotels Biasutti Snc, (C-236/13 P), Ge.A.P. Srl, (C-237/13 P), Rialto Inn Srl, (C-238/13 P), Bonvecchiati Srl, (C-239/13 P); other parties: Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’, Manutencoop Società Cooperativa, formerly Manutencoop Soc. coop. arl and Astrocoop Universale Pulizie, Manutenzioni e Trasporti Soc. coop. arl, Albergo ristorante ‘All’Angelo’ Snc, European Commission

(Joined Cases C-227/13 P to C-239/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - State aid - Aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice))

2014/C 409/28

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellants: Albergo Quattro Fontane Snc, (C-227/13 P), Hotel Gabrielli Srl, formerly Hotel Gabrielli Sandwirth SpA, (C-228/13 P), GE.AL.VE. Srl, (C-229/13 P), Metropolitan SpA, formerly Metropolitan Srl, (C-230/13 P), Hotel Concordia Srl, formerly Hotel Concordia Snc, (C-231/13 P), Società per l’industria alberghiera (SPLIA), (C-232/13 P), Principessa Srl, in liquidation, (C-233/13 P), Albergo Saturnia Internazionale SpA, (C-234/13 P), Savoia e Jolanda Srl, (C-235/13 P), Biasutti Hotels Srl, formerly Hotels Biasutti Snc, (C-236/13 P), Ge.A.P. Srl, (C-237/13 P), Rialto Inn Srl, (C-238/13 P), Bonvecchiati Srl, (C-239/13 P) (represented by: A. Bianchini and F. Busetto, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’, Manutencoop Società Cooperativa, formerly Manutencoop Soc. coop. arl and Astrocoop Universale Pulizie, Manutenzioni e Trasporti Soc. coop. arl, Albergo ristorante ‘All’Angelo’ Snc, European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeals are dismissed.

2. Albergo Quattro Fontane Snc, Hotel Gabrielli Srl, GE.AL.VE. Srl, Metropolitan SpA, Hotel Concordia Srl, Società per l’industria alberghiera (SPLIA), Principessa Srl, Albergo Saturnia Internazionale SpA, Savoia e Jolanda Srl, Biasutti Hotels Srl, Ge.A.P. Srl, Rialto Inn Srl and Bonvecchiati Srl shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 207 of 20.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/45

Order of the President of the Court of 10 July 2014 — European Commission v Council of the European Union: interveners: European Parliament, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-248/13) (1)

2014/C 315/75

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/16

Order of the President of the Court of 24 September 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Cyprus

(Case C-386/13) (1)

(2014/C 431/23)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/25

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-509/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Application for registration of a figurative mark with the word element ‘Metro’ in blue and yellow - Opposition by the proprietor of the coloured Community figurative mark containing the word ‘GRUPOMETROPOLIS’ - Rejection of the opposition))

2014/C 409/36

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: J.-C. Plate, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones SL is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 336, of 16.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/12

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Suceava — Romania) — Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Botoşani v Evangeli Paraskevopoulou

(Case C-668/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Identical question referred - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 7(2)(c) - Applicability of social security conventions between Member States - Repatriated refugee whose country of origin is a Member State - Completion of periods of employment in the territory of another Member State - Application for grant of an old-age benefit - Refusal))

(2015/C 213/17)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Suceava

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Botoşani

Defendant: Evangeli Paraskevopoulou

Operative part of the order

Article 7(2)(c) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, in the version amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1992/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that a bilateral agreement, relating to the social security benefits of nationals of one of the signatory States having had the status of political refugees in the territory of the other signatory State, concluded on a date when one of the two signatory States had not yet acceded to the European Union and not appearing in Annex III to that regulation, does not continue to apply to the situation of political refugees repatriated to their State of origin before the bilateral agreement was concluded and that regulation entered into force.

(1) OJ C 85, 22.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/7

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2015 — GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Villiger Söhne GmbH

(Case C-495/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Figurative mark in colour, consisting of the verbal components ‘LIBERTE american blend’ on a red background - Opposition by the holder of the Community trade mark ‘La LIBERTAD’ - Refusal of registration))

(2015/C 146/09)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (represented by: I. Memmler and S. Schultz, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent), Villiger Söhne GmbH (represented by: B. Pikolin, Rechtsanwätin)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 November 2014 (Općinski sud u Velikoj Gorici, Croatia) — VG Vodoopskrba d.o.o. za vodoopskrbu i odvodnju v Đuro Vladika

(Case C-254/14) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2), of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Community action in the field of water policy - Directive 2000/60/EC - Price to the consumer - Whether fixed costs can be invoiced - Facts preceding the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2015/C 016/20)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Općinski sud u Velikoj Gorici

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VG Vodoopskrba d.o.o. za vodoopskrbu i odvodnju

Defendant: Đuro Vladika

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to reply to the question referred by the (Croatia).

(1) OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/47

Order of the President of the Court of 19 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover — Germany) — TUIfly GmbH v Harald Walter

(Case C-79/14) (1)

2014/C 315/80

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/11

Order of the President of the Court of 17 November 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Juergen Schneider, Erika Schneider v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-382/14) (1)

(2015/C 056/15)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 439, 8.12.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/17

Order of the President of the Court of 25 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Marc Hußock, Ute Hußock, Michelle Hußock, Florian Hußock v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-316/14) (1)

(2014/C 431/27)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/22

Order of the President of the Court of 12 March 2015 — Zweckverband Tierkörperbeseitigung in Rheinland-Pfalz, im Saarland, im Rheingau-Taunus-Kreis und im Landkreis Limburg-Weilburg, in liquidation v European Commission, Saria Bio-Industries AG & Co. KG, SecAnim GmbH, Knochen-und Fett-Union GmbH (KFU)

(Case C-447/14 P) (1)

(2015/C 213/39)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 421, 24.11.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 146/31

Order of the President of the Court of 27 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Turnhout — Belgium) — Openbaar Ministerie v Marc Emiel Melanie De Beuckeleer, Michiel Martinus Zeeuws, Staalbeton NV/SA

(Case C-56/14) (1)

(2015/C 146/39)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/5

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 1 de Miranda de Ebro — Spain) — Banco Grupo Cajatres SA v María Mercedes Manjón Pinilla, Comunidad Hereditaria formada al fallecimiento de D. M. A. Viana Gordejuela

(Case C-90/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Contract entered into between a seller or a supplier and a consumer - Mortgage contract - Default interest clause - Early repayment clause - Mortgage enforcement proceedings - Moderation of the amount of interest - Powers of the national court))

(2015/C 320/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 1 de Miranda de Ebro

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Banco Grupo Cajatres SA

Defendants: María Mercedes Manjón Pinilla, Comunidad Hereditaria formada al fallecimiento de D. M. A. Viana Gordejuela

Operative part of the order

1) Articles 3(1), 4(1), 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that the assessment by the national court of the unfairness of contractual clauses coming under that Directive requires it to take into account the nature of the goods and services which form the subject of the contract concerned by referring, in relation to the date of the conclusion of the contract, to all the circumstances surrounding it.

2) Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Directive 93/13 must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude national provisions for moderating default interest under a mortgage contract, provided that those national provisions: — do not prejudice to the assessment by the national court hearing mortgage enforcement proceedings relating to that contract on the ‘unfairness’ of the default interest clause, and — do not prevent that court setting aside that clause should it conclude that the latter clause is ‘unfair’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 93/13.

(1) OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 213/21

Order of the President of the Court of 23 March 2015 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-162/14) (1)

(2015/C 213/34)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 202, 30.6.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 398/22

Order of the President of the Court of 2 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Aachen — Germany) — Horst Hoeck v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-196/14) (1)

(2015/C 398/28)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/3

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 April 2015 — Sven A. von Storch v European Central Bank (ECB)

(Case C-64/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Person directly concerned - Decisions adopted by the European Central Bank - Guideline 2012/641/EU of the European Central Bank - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court))

(2015/C 320/03)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Sven A. von Storch (represented by: M. Kerber, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: C. Kroppenstedt and G. Gruber, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Sven A. von Storch and the 5 216 other appellants, whose names are listed in the annex to this order, shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 243/14

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 44 de Barcelona — Spain) — Alta Realitat S.L. v Erlock Film ApS, Ulrich Thomsen

(Case C-384/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Cooperation in civil and commercial matters - Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents - Regulation (CE) No 1393/2007 - Article 8 - Failure to provide a translation of the document - Refusal to accept a document - Linguistic knowledge of the addressee of the document - Review by the judge hearing the matter in the Member State of origin))

(2016/C 243/14)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 44 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Alta Realitat S.L.

Defendants: Erlock Film ApS, Ulrich Thomsen

Operative part of the order

Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000, must be interpreted to the effect that, when serving a document on its addressee residing in the territory of another Member State, in a situation where the document has not been drafted in or accompanied by a translation in either a language which the person concerned understands, or the official language of the Member State addressed, or, if there are a number of official languages in that Member State, the official language or one of the official languages of the place where service is to be effected:

— the court seised in the transmitting Member State must ensure that the addressee has been properly informed, by means of the standard form in Annex II to that regulation, of his right to refuse to accept that document;

— where that procedural requirement has not been complied with, it falls to that court to return the proceedings to a lawful footing in accordance with the provisions of that regulation;

— it is not for the court seised to prevent the addressee from exercising his right to refuse to accept that document;

— it is only after the addressee has effectively exercised his right to refuse to accept the document that the court seised may verify whether that refusal was well founded; for that purpose, that court must take into account all the relevant information on the court file in order to determine whether or not the party concerned understands the language in which the document was drafted; and

— where that court finds that the refusal by the addressee of the document was not justified, it may in principle apply the consequences under its national law in such a case, provided that the effectiveness of Regulation No 1393/2007 is preserved.

(1) OJ C 338, 3.11.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/14

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 October 2015 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse e.V. v European Commission, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie

(Case C-517/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Agriculture - Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 - Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications - Registration of the designation ‘Edam Holland’ - Producers using the name ‘Edam’ - Absence of a legal interest in bringing proceedings))

(2016/C 038/19)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse e.V. (represented by: M. Loschelder and V. Schoene, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Schima, J. Guillem Carrau and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: B. Koopman and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents), Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie (represented by: P. van Ginneken and G. Béquet, advocaten)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse e.V. shall pay the costs.

3. The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie shall bear their own respective costs.

(1) OJ C 26 of 26.1.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2016 — Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-237/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 454/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (represented by: M. Wolter, M. Kefferpütz and A.K. Marx, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 270/4

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Raffaele Mignone

(Case C-434/14) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Identical questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Betting and gaming - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences for a shorter term than that of the former licences - Transfer, free of charge, of the rights to use tangible and intangible assets owned constituting the network for the management and collection of bets - Restriction - Overriding reasons in the public interest - Proportionality))

(2016/C 270/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Bari

Criminal proceedings against

Raffaele Mignone

Operative part of the order

1. Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation on betting and gaming, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders for the award of licences with a shorter period of validity than that of the licences awarded in the past on account of the reorganisation of the system through the alignment of licence expiry dates.

2. Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a restrictive national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires a licensee of a betting and gambling service to transfer, free of charge, on the cessation of business as a result of the expiry of the final term of the licence, the rights to use tangible and intangible assets which he owns and which constitute his network for the management and collection of bets, in so far as that restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the objective actually pursued by that provision, which is for the referring court to verify.

(1) OJ C 448, 15.12.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 429/7

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015 — Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação, Massa Insolvente do Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação v European Commission

(Case C-93/15 P) (1)

((Appeal - Aid granted by the Republic of Portugal in favour of a financial institution in the form of a State guarantee underwriting a loan - Decision declaring the State aid to be incompatible with the internal market - Article 107(1) TFEU - Article 107(3)(b) TFEU - Appeal manifestly inadmissible and manifestly unfounded))

(2015/C 429/09)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Appellants: Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação, Massa Insolvente do Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação (represented by: M. Ferreira Santos and R Leandro Vasconcelos, advogadas)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. França and L. Flynn, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Banco Privado Português SA and Massa Insolvente do Banco Privado Português SA are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.