ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 3 November 2021 — ExxonMobil Production Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-731/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Greenhouse gases - Allocation of emission allowances - Request to transfer emission certificates to Germany - Request made in the context of national proceedings for interim relief aimed at guaranteeing the effectiveness of the preliminary ruling procedure in Case C-126/20 - Commission refusal decision - Locus standi - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 2/52)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH (Hanover, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and J. Hoss, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 8 December 2020 refusing the request of the Deutsche Emissionshandelsstelle (German Emissions Trading Authority) to transfer, as a protective measure, to the national holding account of the Federal Republic of Germany or, in the alternative, to the applicant’s operator holding account, by 31 December 2020 at the latest, a number of greenhouse gas emission allowances corresponding to the number of additional allowances covered by the application filed by the applicant with the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Administrative Court, Berlin, Germany) for the free allocation of emission allowances for the third greenhouse gas emission allowance trading period.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH shall pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

(1) OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 June 2022 — Daimler v Commission

(Case T-509/20) (1)

(Environment - Regulation (EU) 2019/631 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153 - Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1035 - Carbon dioxide emissions - Testing methodology - Passenger cars - Amendment of the contested decision as regards the applicant - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 303/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Daimler AG (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: N. Wimmer, C. Arhold and G. Ollinger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Re:

By application lodged at the General Court Registry on 14 August 2020, the applicant brought the present action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1035 of 3 June 2020 confirming or amending the provisional calculation of the average specific emissions of CO2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles for the calendar year 2018 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2020 L 227, p. 37).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Daimler AG.

(1) OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission

(Case T-604/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Act making imports subject to registration - Provisional anti-dumping duty - Suspension of the registration obligation - Definitive anti-dumping duty - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 119/60)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd (Qingyuan, China) and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd (Yuan Tan Town, China) (represented by: M. Maresca, C. Malinconico, D. Maresca, A. Cerruti, A. Malinconico, G. La Malfa Ribolla, D. Guardamagna and M. Guardamagna, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, P. Němečková and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1215 of 21 August 2020 making imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China subject to registration (OJ 2020 L 275, p. 16).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

3. Guangdong Haomei New Materials, Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology, the Commission and Airoldi Metalli SpA shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 390, 16.11.2020.
Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2021 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-95/21 R)

(Interim relief - State aid - State aid scheme implemented by Portugal in favour of the Madeira Free Zone - Application of that aid scheme in breach of Commission Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 320/43)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, L. Borrego, P. Barros da Costa, M. Marques and A. Soares de Freitas, acting as Agents, and by M. Gorjão Henriques and A. Saavedra, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission (represented by: P. Arenas and G. Braga da Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for interim measures seeking, first, suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal in favour of the Madeira Free Zone (MFZ) — Regime III and, second, that the Commission be ordered not to publish that decision in the Official Journal of the European Union until a judgment has been delivered in the main proceedings.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed;
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Kassl (STUDIO KASSL)

(Case T-7/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 163/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J.F. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Kassl Holding BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 October 2020 (Case R 880/2020-4), relation to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés and Kassl.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 1 October 2021 — Alliance française de Bruxelles Europe and Others v Commission

(Case T-285/21) (1)

(2021/C 490/64)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 278, 12.7.2021.
Order of the General Court of 27 July 2021 — Alliance française de Bruxelles-Europe and Others v Commission

(Case T-285/21 R)

(Application for interim relief - Public supply contracts - Provision of language training services - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 391/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Alliance française de Bruxelles-Europe (Brussels, Belgium) and the 7 others applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: E. van Nuffel d’Heynsbroeck, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Araujo Arce and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, suspension of operation of the decision of the Commission of 19 April 2021 to award Lot No 4 (French language training) of the contract relating to framework contracts for language training for the institutions, bodies and agencies of the European Union (HR/2020/OP/0014) in first place to the consortium CLL Centre de Langues — Allingua and in second place to the consortium Alliance Europe Multilingue constituted by the applicants and, second, the grant of any other interim measure that the Court considers appropriate.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2021 — Cepewa v EUIPO — Out of the blue (LIEBLINGSMENSCH)

(Case T-47/21) (1)

(2022/C 73/85)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 October 2021 — Abenante and Others v Parliament and Council

(Case T-527/21 R)

(Interim relief - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - EU Digital COVID Certificate - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2022/C 2/54)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Stefania Abenante (Ferrara, Italy) and the 423 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Sandri, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio, J. Rodrigues and P. López-Carceller, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and S. Scarpa Ferraglio, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of Article 3(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2021 on a framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable COVID-19 vaccination, test and recovery certificates (EU Digital COVID Certificate) to facilitate free movement during the COVID-19 pandemic (OJ 2021 L 211, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — D&A Pharma v EMA

(Case T-381/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus - Non-renewal of a permanent scientific advisory group - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 119/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Debregeas et associés Pharma (D&A Pharma) (Paris, France) (represented by: N. Viguié and D. Krzisch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: C. Bortoluzzi, H. Kerr, S. Marino and S. Drosos, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of EMA not to renew the scientific advisory group on psychiatry within the Committee for Human Medicinal Products, revealed implicitly by the public call for expression of interest for experts to become members of EMA’s scientific advisory groups and the press release of EMA of 5 May 2021.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the European Parliament.

3. Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) shall pay the costs.

4. The Parliament shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.
Order of the General Court of 27 January 2022 — About You v EUIPO — Safe 1 Immobilieninvest (Y/O/U), (Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U) and (/Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U)

(Joined Cases T-23/21, T-50/21 and T-51/21) (1)

(2022/C 119/84)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2022 — the airscreen company v EUIPO — Moviescreens Rental (airscreen)

(Case T-382/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark airscreen - Earlier EU word mark AIRSCREEN - Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 198/73)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Moviescreens Rental GmbH (Damme, Germany) (represented by: D. Schulz and P. Stelzig, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 May 2021 (Case R 1990/2020-4), concerning opposition proceedings between the airscreen company and Moviescreens Rental.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2022 — eSlovensko v Commission

(Case T-295/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Financial provisions - EU programme on promoting safer use of the internet - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 171/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: eSlovensko (Lučenec, Slovakia) (represented by: B. Fridrich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and S. Romoli, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2021) 1955613 of 18 March 2021 concerning a recovery order for project SI 2010 SIC 1231002 (‘Safer Internet SK SIC’).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. eSlovensko shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 March 2022 — Gustopharma Consumer Health v EUIPO — Helixor Heilmittel (HELIXORIGINAL)

(Case T-797/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 237/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gustopharma Consumer Health, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Wachinger and R. Drozdz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Helixor Heilmittel GmbH (Rosenfield, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 October 2021 (Case R 1644/2019-1), in relation to opposition proceedings between Helixor Heilmittel and Gustopharma Consumer Health.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Gustopharma Consumer Health, SL shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 1 April 2022 — Classen Holz Kontor v EUIPO — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer (DRYTILE)

(Case T-307/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/66)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 May 2022 — NJ v Commission

(Case T-693/21) (1)

(2022/C 284/81)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 April 2022 — Daw v EUIPO — Sapa Building Systems (alpina)

(Case T-766/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 276/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Daw SE (Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Sapa Building Systems SpA (Naviglio, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 September 2021 (Case R 2198/2020-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Daw and Sapa Building Systems.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2022 — Agentur für Globale Gesundheitsverantwortung v EMA

(Case T-713/21) (1)

(2022/C 340/78)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 2 May 2022 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission

(Case T-328/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Act imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty - Importer - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 284/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (Molteno, Italy) (represented by: M. Campa, M. Pirovano, D. Rovetta, G. Pandey, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 of 29 March 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2021 L 109, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Airoldi Metalli SpA shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.
Order of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — FC v EUAA

(Case T-697/21) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Disciplinary proceedings - Refusal of request to stay disciplinary proceedings pending judgments of the General Court in related cases - Delivery of judgments of the General Court in the related pending cases - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 463/68)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: FC (represented by: V. Christianos, G. Kelepouri and A. Skoulikis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) (represented by: P. Eyckmans and M. Stamatopoulou, acting as Agents, and T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and L. Burguin, lawyers)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) of 25 July 2021 rejecting her complaint against the decisions of the EUAA of 24 February and 14 March 2021, by which the Chairman of the Disciplinary Board of the EUAA refused her request for staying the disciplinary proceedings initiated against her.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. FC shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Asylum.

(1) OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 September 2022 — Schenk Italia v EUIPO — Consorzio per la tutela dei vini Valpolicella (AMICONE)

(Case T-474/21) (1)

(2022/C 408/58)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 April 2022 — NW v Commission

(Case T-20/22) (1)

(2022/C 276/37)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 September 2022 — Biologische Heilmittel Heel v EUIPO — Esi (TRAUMGEL)

(Case T-130/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL - Earlier EU word mark Traumeel - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 451/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH (Baden-Baden, Germany) (represented by: J. Künzel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Esi Srl (Albisola Superiore, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the partial annulment and partial alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 December 2021 (Case R 813/2021-4).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 171, 25.4.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 July 2022 — PQ v EEAS

(Case T-358/22) (1)

(2022/C 359/120)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 294, 1.8.2022.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 November 2022 — Narzieva v Council

(Case T-238/22) (1)

(2023/C 24/114)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.
Order of the General Court of 7 October 2022 — OG and Others v Commission

(Case T-101/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/503 - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2288 - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - EU Digital COVID Certificate - Freedom of movement for persons - Restrictions - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 463/74)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: OG and Others (represented by: D. Gómez Fernández, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek, in essence, annulment, first, of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2288 of 21 December 2021 amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the acceptance period of vaccination certificates issued in the EU Digital COVID Certificate format indicating the completion of the primary vaccination series (OJ 2021 L 458, p. 459) and, second, of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/503 of 29 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards exempting minors from the acceptance period of vaccination certificates issued in the EU Digital COVID Certificate format (OJ 2022 L 102, p. 8).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. OG and Others shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings before the Court.

(1) OJ C 165, 19.4.2022.