ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/25

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2013 –Van Neyghem v Council

(Case T-113/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2007 promotion year - Decision to not promote the appellant to Grade AST 7 - Dismissal of action at first instance - Obligation to state reasons - Article 266 TFEU - Appeal in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

2013/C 336/54

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Kris Van Neyghem (Tienen, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the decision of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 in Case F-77/11 Van Neyghem v Council, (not yet published in the ECR), and seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is rejected.

2. Mr Kris Van Neyghem is to bear his own costs and those incurred by the Council of the European Union in these proceedings.

(1) OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
Order of the General Court of 13 January 2014 — Lebedef v Commission

(Joined Cases T-116/13 P and T-117/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Reports - Career development report - 2008 and 2009 evaluation period - Half -time secondment for the purposes of union representation - Staff evaluation reports covering the tasks carried out in the service to which he was assigned - Designation for union purpose - Actions dismissed at first instance as manifestly unfounded - Appeal dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly unfounded)

(2014/C 71/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Two appeals brought against the orders of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012, in Case F 70/11 Lebedef v Commission and in Case F 109/11 Lebedef v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking an order that those orders be set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeals are dismissed.

2. Mr Giorgio Lebedef will bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal.

(1) OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/45

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2013 — Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology v Commission

(Case T-154/13) (1)

2014/C 45/81

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/52

Order of the General Court of 1 April 2014 — Hangzhou Zhejiang University Sunny Energy Science and Technology v Commission

(Case T-144/13) (1)

2014/C 175/71

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27. 4. 2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 142/35

Order of the General Court of 3 February 2014 — Imax v OHIM — Himax Technologies (IMAX)

(Case T-198/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 142/45

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Imax Corporation (Mississauga, Canada) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, lawyer, and K. Hughes, solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Himax Technologies, Inc. (Hsinhua, Taiwan)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 January 2013 (Case R 740/2012-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Himax Technologies, Inc. and Imax Corporation.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The parties shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.13.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 253/29

Order of the General Court of 5 June 2014 — Atmeh v OHIM — Fretier (MONTALE MTL MONTALE Dezign)

(Case T-239/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 253/42

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Ammar Atmeh (Diera-Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: A. Berthet, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Sylvie Fretier (Paris, France) (represented by: T. Cuche, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 14 February 2013 (Joined Cases R 1482/2011-4 and R 1571/2011-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Ammar Atmeh and Sylvie Fretier.

Operative part of the order

1) There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2) The applicant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 194/38

Order of the General Court of 28 April 2014 — Deweerdt and Others v Court of Auditors

(Case T-132/13) (1)

2014/C 194/52

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/56

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — CMC France v Commission

(Case T-236/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/94

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CMC France (Châtenois, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. CMC France is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/72

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2014 — Pell Amar Cosmetics v OHIM — Alva Management (Pell amar dr. Ionescu — Calinesti)

(Case T-621/13) (1)

2014/C 315/120

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/65

Order of the General Court of 1 October 2014 — Ratioparts-Ersatzteile v OHIM — IIC (NORTHWOOD)

(Case T-509/13) (1)

2014/C 409/86

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 339/18

Order of the General Court of 18 June 2014 — NumberFour v OHIM — Inaer Helicópteros (ENFORE)

(Case T-478/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 339/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: NumberFour AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Götz, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Inaer Helicópteros, SA (Mutxamel, Spain) (represented by: C. Giner Mas and R. Rodriguez Zaragoza, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2013 (Case R 1000/2012-5), relating to opposition proceedings between NumberFour AG and Inaer Helicópteros, SA

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs borne by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Order of the General Court of 6 November 2014 — ANKO v Commission

(Case T-17/13) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Contract concerning the Pocemon project - Repayment of the sums advanced - Letter giving notice of the issue of a debit note - Reminder letter - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2015/C 016/58)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and A. Cordewener, acting as Agents, assisted by S. Drakakakis, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought under Article 272 TFEU, seeking a declaration by the General Court first, that the applicant is not obliged to repay the whole sum paid to it by the Commission in relation to the Pocemon project, concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013), secondly, that the applicant is not required to pay flat-rate compensation in relation to that project and, thirdly, that the Commission is not entitled to set off the amounts that it owes to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 421/43

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2014 — Marcuccio v Commisison

(Case T-447/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Reimbursement of recoverable costs - Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal - Availability of a parallel remedy - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

2014/C 421/61

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: initially, C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Banquero Cruz, and subsequently C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (single judge) of 18 June 2013 in Case F-143/11 Marcuccio v Commission, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:81, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the present case.

(1) OJ C 291, 5.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 65/31

Order of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató (CAMEA)

(Case T-195/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark CAMEA - Earlier international word mark BALEA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 065/43)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: B. Beinert, O. Bludovsky and T. Strack, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Németh, P. Geroulakos and V. Melgar, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft (Szada, Hungary) (represented by: A. Krajnyák, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 January 2013 (Case R 452/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG and V-Contact Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. dismisses the action.

2. orders dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/28

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2014 — Ledra Advertising v Commission and ECB

(Case T-289/13) (1)

((Action for annulment and compensation - Stability support programme for Cyprus - Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the ESM - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Causal link - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 026/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ledra Advertising Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Paschalides, Solicitor, and A. Paschalides, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders and J.-P. Keppenne, Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

First, application for annulment of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 of the Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) on 26 April 2013, and, second, for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the inclusion of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 in the Memorandum of Understanding and an infringement of the Commission’s supervisory obligation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ledra Advertising Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 205/32

Order of the General Court of 14 April 2015 — SolarWorld and Solsonica v Commission

(Case T-393/13) (1)

((Dumping - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from China - Provisional anti-dumping duty))

(2015/C 205/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: SolarWorld AG (Bonn, Germany) and Solsonica SpA (Cittaducale, Italy), (represented by: L. Ruessmann, lawyer, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 of 4 June 2013 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China and amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2013 making these imports originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China subject to registration (OJ 2013 L 152, p. 5), to the extent that the rate of those provisional duties was established, for the period from 6 June to 5 August 2013, at a level which eliminates neither the dumping nor the loss, secondly, an application for an order that the customs authorities of the Member States be directed to apply the full anti-dumping duty rates as from 6 June 2013 and, thirdly, an action in non-contractual liability against the Commission for the loss that the applicants allegedly suffered due to the application, for the period from 6 June to 5 August 2013, of the provisional anti-dumping duties at the rate introduced by Regulation No 513/2013.

Operative part of the order

1) The second head of claim of SolarWorld AG and Solsonica SpA, seeking an order that the customs authorities of the Member States be directed to apply the anti-dumping duty rates set out in Article 1(2)(ii) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 of 4 June 2013 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China and amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2013 making these imports originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China subject to registration, as from 6 June 2013, is manifestly inadmissible.

2) There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action for annulment of Regulation No 513/2013, nor on the action for damages.

3) SolarWorld and Solsonica shall bear their own costs, as well as one-third of the costs of the European Commission. The latter shall bear the remainder of its own costs.

(1) OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 January 2015 — Kicks Kosmetikkedjan v OHIM — Kik Textilien (KICKS)

(Case T-532/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 107/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Kicks Kosmetikkedjan AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: K. Strömholm, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Kik Textilien und Non-Food GmbH (Bönen, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 July 2013 (Case R 991/2012-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Kik Textilien und Non-Food GmbH et Kicks Kosmetikkedjan AB.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 359, 7.12.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/27

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — Philip Morris Benelux v Commission

(Case T-520/13) (1)

((Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Draft impact assessment report prepared in the context of the proposal for a revision of the directive on tobacco products - Refusal to grant access - Disclosure after commencement of the action - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 381/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Philip Morris Benelux (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: K. Nordlander, lawyer, and P. Harrison, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 15 July 2013 refusing the request for access to preliminary drafts of the impact assessment report attached to the Commission’s proposal for a revised directive on tobacco products.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by Philip Morris Benelux.

(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 311/45

Order of the General Court of 22 June 2015 — In vivo v Commission

(Case T-690/13) (1)

((Action for failure to act - Refusal of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) to open an external investigation - Position defined - Application for directions to be issued - No direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 311/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: In vivo OOO (Abinsk, Russia) (represented by: T. Huopalainen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action seeking a declaration by the General Court that the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) failed to act in refusing to open an external investigation and an order that it remedy the situation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. In vivo OOO shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 357/31

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2017 — Systran v Commission

(Joined Cases T-481/13 and T-421/15) (1)

(2017/C 357/40)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 336, 16.11.2013.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 April 2016 — Inclusion Alliance for Europe v Commission

(Case T-539/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Seventh framework programme for research and technological development including demonstration activities (2007-2013) - MARE, Senior and ECRN projects - Recovery of a share of the financial contribution paid - Enforcement decision - Nature of the pleas relied on - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 211/65)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: S. Famiani, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Di Paolo and F. Moro, acting as Agents, assisted by D. Gullo, lawyer)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 4693 final of 17 July 2013 concerning the recovery of a sum of EUR 212 411,89, plus interest, owed by the applicant in the context of the MARE, Senior and ECRN projects.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 15, 18.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 245/28

Order of the President of the General Court of 2 June 2015 — Buga v Parliament and Others

(Case T-241/15 R)

((Application - Directive on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing - Application for interim measures - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 245/34)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Aurel Buga (Bacău, Romania) (represented by: M.Vasii, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament, Council of the European Union and European Commission

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking to order the Romanian authorities to suspend the criminal proceedings opened against the applicant before a national court.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/59

Order of the General Court of 20 November 2015 — Zitro IP v OHIM (WORLD OF BINGO)

(Case T-202/15) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for the Community figurative mark WORLD OF BINGO - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 038/79)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 February 2015 (Case R 1899/2014-4) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign WORLD OF BINGO as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Zitro IP Sàrl shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 198, 15.6.2015.