ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov — Romania) — NL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București

(Case C-679/19) (1)

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union - Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 - Scope - Articles 63 and 65 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Transport of large amounts of cash entering or leaving the territory of a Member State - Obligation to declare - Sanctions - Fine and confiscation for the benefit of the State of an undeclared sum in excess of 10 000 euros - Proportionality)

(2020/C 137/36)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Ilfov

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: NL

Defendant: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București

Operative part of the order

Articles 63 and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding the rules of a Member State which, for the purpose of sanctioning the failure of the obligation to declare large sums of cash entering or leaving the territory of that State provides, in addition to the imposition of an administrative fine, for the confiscation for the benefit of the State an undeclared sum in excess of 10 000 euros.

(1) OJ C 423, 17.12.2019
Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 20 January 2020 — Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-202/19 P) (1)

(2020/C 313/26)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Kehl — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against FU

(Cases C-554/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Regulation (EU) 2016/399 - Schengen borders code - Articles 22 and 23 - Abolition of internal border controls in the Schengen area - Checks within the territory of a Member State - Measures having an effect equivalent to border checks - Identity checks in the vicinity of an internal border of the Schengen area - Possibilities of checks irrespective of the behaviour of the person concerned or of the existence of specific circumstances - National framework concerning the intensity, frequency and selectivity of the checks)

(2020/C 287/29)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Kehl

Criminal proceedings against

FU

Intervening party: Staatsanwaltschaft Offenburg

Operative part of the order

Article 67(2) TFEU and Articles 22 and 23 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) must be interpreted as not precluding a national legislative provision which confers on the police authorities of the Member State in question the power to check the identity of any person, within an area of 30 kilometres from that Member State’s land border with other Schengen States, with a view to preventing or terminating unlawful entry into or residence in the territory of that Member State or preventing certain criminal offences which undermine the security of the border, irrespective of the conduct of the person concerned or the existence of specific circumstances, provided that that power is framed by sufficiently detailed specifications and limitations on the intensity, frequency and selectivity of the checks carried out, thereby guaranteeing that the practical exercise of that power cannot have an effect equivalent to border checks, which is, however, a matter for the referring court to verify.

(1) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 5 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (formerly Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság) — Hungary) — EY v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság, anciennement Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal

(Case C-40/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/32)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 8 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — flightright GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG

(Case C-661/19) (1)

(2020/C 313/31)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 29 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — PO v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real

(Case C-531/19) (1)

(2020/C 329/15)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 13 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 2 de Nules — Spain) — Investcapital Ltd v FE

(Case C-524/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/38)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 5 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln — Germany) — Interseroh Dienstleistungs GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

(Case C-353/19) (1)

(2020/C 423/48)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 25 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt — Sweden) — Novartis AG v Patent-och registreringsverket

(Case C-354/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/36)

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 13 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) — United Kingdom) — Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company v PMS International Group

(Case C-728/19) (1)

(2021/C 62/26)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 423, 16.12.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 29 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta — Spain) — JF, KG v Bankia SA

(Case C-482/19) (1)

(2021/C 44/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2021 — Scandlines Danmark ApS, Scandlines Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-173/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Action for annulment - State aid - Public financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link - Individual aid - Act not open to challenge - Purely confirmatory measure - Preparatory measure)

(2021/C 471/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Scandlines Danmark ApS, Scandlines Deutschland GmbH (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë, V. Bottka and L. Armati, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Nymann-Lindegren, acting as Agent, and by R. Holdgaard, advokat)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded.

2. Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH shall pay, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Kingdom of Denmark shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 February 2021 — Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank

(Case C-701/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Appeal manifestly unfounded - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority - Appointment of a contact person - Conditional communication with the European Central Bank (ECB) - Withdrawal of licence prior to the commencement of proceedings - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Absence of a sufficiently clear and precise summary of the pleas in law relied on before the General Court - Failure to demonstrate a legal interest in bringing proceedings - Incorrect classification as a preparatory act - Substitution of grounds)

(2021/C 182/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Pilatus Bank plc (represented initially by O.H. Behrends and M. Kirchner, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by O.H. Behrends)

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, M. Anastasiou and A. Karpf, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Pilatus Bank plc is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di appello di Napoli — Italy) — TJ v Balga Srl

(Case C-32/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Protection in the event of unjustified dismissal - Articles 20, 21, 34 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Directive 98/59/EC - Collective dismissal - National legislation on the protection to be afforded to a worker who has been the subject of unjustified collective dismissal on account of a violation of the criteria for selecting the workers to be dismissed - Absence of a situation regarding the implementation of EU law within the meaning of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Inapplicability of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)

(2020/C 320/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte di appello di Napoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TJ

Defendant: Balga Srl

Operative part of the order

The Court manifestly lacks jurisdiction to reply to the questions referred by the Corte d’appello di Napoli (Court of Appeal, Naples, Italy) by decision of 18 September 2019.

(1) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 14 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — BC v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-467/20) (1)

(2021/C 79/36)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court of Justice has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 19 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Laudamotion GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation

(Case C-189/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/60)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus — Finland) — Kuluttaja-asiamies v MiGame Oy

(Case C-594/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 2011/83/EU - Consumer contracts - Article 21 - ‘Communication by telephone’ - Telephone line operated by a trader so that consumers may contact it for matters relating to a previously concluded contract - Provision by a company, as part of the after-sales service for previously concluded contracts, of two telephone lines, namely a premium-rate landline and a mobile telephone line that is free of charge - Media content targeted at customers - Acceptability of a helpline which charges customers at a rate exceeding the basic rate - Concept of ‘basic rate’)

(2021/C 289/27)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Markkinaoikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kuluttaja-asiamies

Defendant: MiGame Oy

Operative part of the order

The first subparagraph of Article 21 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as precluding a trader from providing customers with, in addition to a telephone number charged at no more than the basic rate, a telephone number charged at a rate exceeding that rate which may be used by consumers who concluded a contract with that trader.

(1) OJ C 35, 1.2.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 22 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail du Brabant wallon — Belgium) — PR v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil)

(Case C-335/20) (1)

(2021/C 138/37)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court of Justice has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 313, 21.9.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — JT, NQ v Ryanair DAC

(Case C-516/20) (1)

(2021/C 357/22)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Potenza — Italy) — OM v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Conservatorio di Musica ‘E.R. Duni’ di Matera

(Case C-571/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of procedure of the Court of Justice - Reference for a preliminary ruling on the validity of a provision of the FEU Treaty - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court - Free movement of workers - Equal treatment - Article 45 TFEU - Difference in status and salary between university teachers and teachers working in the art and music higher education national system - Purely internal situation - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 320/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Potenza

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: OM

Defendants: Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Conservatorio di Musica ‘E.R. Duni’ di Matera

Operative part of the order

1. The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the first and second questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Potenza (District Court, Potenza, Italy).

2. The third question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Potenza (District Court, Potenza, Italy) is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 July 2021 — Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova v European Commission

(Case C-717/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Spouse of a Greek diplomat who resided in Brussels prior to the recruitment - Definition of the place of recruitment and the centre of interests - Refusal to grant the appellant the expatriation allowance and related benefits - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(2021/C 391/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova (represented by: S. Pappas, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2. Ms Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova shall bear her own costs.

(1) OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v CS

(Case C-630/20) (1)

(2021/C 368/24)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 72, 1.3.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘AKZ — Burgas’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Burgas

(Case C-602/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security contributions - Repayment of contributions wrongly paid - Limitation of interest on repayment - National procedural autonomy - Principle of equivalence - Principle of effectiveness - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 95/03)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘AKZ — Burgas’ EOOD

Defendant: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Burgas

Intervener: Varhovna administrativna prokuratura na Republika Bulgaria

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Varhoven administrativen sad (Supreme Administrative Court, Bulgaria) by decision of 30 September 2020 is manifestly inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Proximité d’Aulnay-sous-Bois — France) — YE and Others v Vueling Airlines SA

(Case C-686/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights - Article 3(3) - Scope - Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public - Young child travelling free of charge - Article 2(f) - Definition of ‘ticket’)

(2022/C 24/12)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de Proximité d’Aulnay-sous-Bois

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: YE, LP, AN, legally represented by her parents YE and LP, OL, legally represented by her parents YE and LP, VX, legally represented by his parents YE and LP, CE, legally represented by her parents YE and LP

Defendant: Vueling Airlines SA

Operative part of the order

1. The first sentence of Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that the condition of direct or indirect availability to the public, contained in that provision, does not refer to passengers travelling free of charge.

2. The second sentence of Article 3(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 must be interpreted as meaning that a passenger who travels free of charge on account of his or her young age, but who does not have an allocated seat or a boarding pass and whose name does not appear on the reservations booked by his or her parents, is excluded from the scope of that regulation.

(1) Date lodged: 18 December 2020
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava I — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against AM

(Case C-710/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Field of application - Article 51 - Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty - Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution - Failure to implement EU law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2022/C 368/04)

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Okresný súd Bratislava I

Party in the main proceedings

AM,

Intervening party: Krajská prokuratúra v Bratislave

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Okresný súd Bratislava I (District Court, Bratislava I, Slovakia) by decision of 12 December 2018.

(1) OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.
Order of the President of the Second of the Court of 1 February 2022 — ViaSat, Inc. v European Commission, Inmarsat Ventures SE, formerly Inmarsat Ventures Ltd

(Case C-235/20 P) (1)

(2022/C 222/36)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Belgium) — Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent

(Case C-316/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 2014/24/EU - Conduct of the procedure - Choice of participants and award of contracts - Article 63 - Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority - Failure to meet the requirements relating to the technical and professional ability of the tenderer by the entity on whose capacities the tenderer intends to rely - Obligation to allow that tenderer to replace that entity - Principle of proportionality)

(2022/C 64/06)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Monument Vandekerckhove NV

Defendant: Stad Gent

Other parties: Denys NV, Aelterman BVBA

Operative part of the order

The second subparagraph of Article 63(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, read in conjunction with the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and proportionality as set out in Article 18(1) of that directive, must be interpreted as meaning that, where it ascertains that an entity on whose capacity an economic operator intends to rely does not fulfil the selection criteria, the contracting authority is obliged to request that the economic operator replace that entity, if it does not wish to be excluded from the public procurement procedure concerned.

(1) OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the Court of 18 August 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov — Romania) — S.C. Techno-Gaz K.F.T. PAKS v U.A.T. Comuna Dalnic

(Case C-298/21) (1)

(2021/C 471/45)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.