ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/37

Order of the General Court of 17 September 2014 — ATC and Others v Commission

(Case T-333/10) (1)

((Non-contractual liability - Importation of birds - Agreement on the quantified amounts of the award of compensation for the damages suffered - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 409/53

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Animal Trading Company (ATC) BV (Loon op Zand, Netherlands); Avicentra NV (Malle, Belgium); Borgstein Birds and Zoofood Trading VOF (Wamel, Netherlands); Bird Trading Company Van der Stappen BV (Dongen, Netherlands); New Little Bird’s srl (Anagni, Italy); Vogelhuis Kloeg (Zevenbergen, Netherlands) and Giovanni Pistone (Westerlo, Belgium) (represented by: M. Osse and J. Houdijk, lawyers

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by F. Jimeno Fernández and B. Burggraaf, and subsequently by F. Jimeno Fernández and H. Kranenborg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the adoption first, of Commission Decision 2005/760/EC of 27 October 2005 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain third countries for the import of captive birds (OJ 2005 L 285, p. 60), as extended, and of Commission Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 of 23 March 2007 laying down animal health conditions for imports of certain birds into the Community and the quarantine conditions thereof (OJ 2007 L 84, p. 7).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. Animal Trading Company (ATC) BV, Avicentra NV, Borgstein Birds and Zoofood Trading VOF, Bird Trading Company Van der Stappen BV, New Little Birds Srl, Vogelhuis Kloeg and M. Giovanni Pistone are to bear their own costs.

3. The European Commission is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/19

Order of the General Court of 4 December 2013 — Forgital Italy v Council

(Case T-438/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Common Customs Tariff - Temporary suspension of the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial, agricultural and fishery products - Amendment of the description of certain suspensions - Regulatory act comprising implementing measures - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 39/32

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Forgital Italy SpA (Velo d'Astico, Italy) (represented by: V. Turinetti di Priero and R. Mastroianni, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: M.F. Florindo Gijón and A. Lo Monaco, and subsequently by: M. Florindo Gijón and K. Pellinghelli, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and L. Keppenne, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for the annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 566/2010 of 29 June 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 temporarily suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial, agricultural and fishery products (OJ 2010 L 163, p. 4), in so far as it amends the description of certain goods in respect of which the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties were suspended.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Forgital Italy SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.
1.

Paragraph 174 of the judgment of 11 April 2018, H v Council (T-271/10 RENV, EU:T:2018:180), is amended as follows: ‘Under Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings. Nevertheless, in accordance with Article 133 of the Rules of Procedure, read in conjunction with Article 219 of those rules, a decision as to all the costs relating to the appeal proceedings and the proceedings initiated before the General Court is to be given in the judgment which closes the proceedings. Furthermore, Article 134(3) of those rules provides that the parties are to bear their own costs where each party succeeds on some and fails on other heads. However, if it appears justified in the circumstances of the case, the General Court may order that one party, in addition to bearing his own costs, pay a proportion of the costs of the other party. In the circumstances of the present case, it is appropriate to order the Council to bear the costs incurred by the applicant and itself up to the time of delivery of the judgment on appeal, only in so far as they relate to the question of the admissibility of the action, and to order the applicant to bear all the other costs incurred by the Council and herself both before and after that judgment was delivered.’
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/16

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2015 — Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission

(Case T-203/10 RENV) (1)

((State aid - Social housing - Scheme of aid granted to housing corporations - Existing aid - Decision accepting Member State’s commitments - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 221/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Stichting Woonpunt (Maastricht, Netherlands); Stichting Havensteder, formerly Stichting Com.wonen (Rotterdam, Netherlands); Woningstichting Haag Wonen (The Hague, Netherlands); and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented initially by P. Glazener and E. Henny and subsequently by P. Glazener, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal and S. Noë, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Kingdom of Belgium (represented initially by T. Materne and J.-C. Halleux, and subsequently by J.-C. Halleux, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) (Voorburg, Pays-Bas) (represented by: M. Meulenbelt, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 — Netherlands — Existing and special project aid to housing corporations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Orders Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Havensteder, Woningstichting Haag Wonen and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 120/12

Order of the President of the General Court of 2 March 2011 — Westfälisch-Lippischer Sparkassen -und Giroverband v Commission

(Case T-22/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Manifestly inadmissible)

2011/C 120/31

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Westfälisch-Lippischer Sparkassen -und Giroverband (Münster, Germany) (represented by: A.Rosenfeld and I. Liebach, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, B. Martenczuk and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the Commission’s decision of 21 December 2010 C(2010) 9525 final State aid, MC 8/2009 and C 43/2009 — Germany — WestLB transfers, in so far as it follows that Westdeutsche Immobilien Bank AG’s new operations after 15 February 2011 must be terminated.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for suspension of operation is rejected.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on Westdeutsche Immobilien Bank AG’s application for leave to intervene.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/21

Order of the General Court of 6 July 2011 — SIR v Council

(Case T-142/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Withdrawal of the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 282/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société ivoirienne de raffinage (SIR) (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and A. Vitro, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36) and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), on the ground that those measures establish restrictive measures which cause the applicant harm

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Commission’s application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 130, of 30.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 186/32

Order of the General Court of 4 May 2011 — BIA Separations v Commission

(Case T-88/11) (1)

2011/C 186/59

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/35

Order of the President of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — Computer Resources International (Luxembourg) v Commission

(Case T-422/11 R)

(Interim measures - Public procurement - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tender - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Loss of opportunity - Lack of serious and irreparable damage - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 347/64

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Computer Resources International (Luxembourg) SA (Dommeldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and D. Calciu, Agents, and by E. Petritsi, lawyer)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union of 22 July 2011 which, on the one hand, rejects the tenders submitted by the applicant in tendering procedure AO 10340 concerning the supply of computing services for software development, maintenance, consultancy and assistance for different types of IT applications (OJ 2011/S 66-106099) and, on the other, informs the applicant that the relevant framework contract has been awarded to other tenderers.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 340/24

Order of the General Court of 23 September 2011 — Bro Grébé v Council

(Case T-194/11) (1)

(Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Côte d'Ivoire - Action for annulment - Inaction of the applicant - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 340/50

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Geneviève Bro Grébé (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Chavrier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment, firstly, of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36) and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011, amending Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 of 12 April 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Ms Geneviève Bro Grébé shall pay the costs.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of the European Commission and the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire.

(1) OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 49/25

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2011 — Al-Chihabi v Council

(Case T-593/11 R)

(Interim relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for interim measures - No urgency - No serious and irreparable damage)

2012/C 49/45

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fares Al-Chihabi (Aleppo, Syria) (represented by: L. Ruessmann and W. Berg, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, Agents)

Re:

Application for, in essence, the suspension of operation of Council Decision 2011/522/CFSP of 2 September 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 16), Council Regulation (EU) No 878/2011 of 2 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 1), Council Decision 2011/684/CFSP of 13 October 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 269, p. 33) and Council Regulation (EU) No 1011/2011 of 13 October 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 269, p. 18), to the extent that those measures affect the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Order of the President of the General Court of 24 November 2011 — Éditions Jacob v Commission

(Case T-471/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Concentration of enterprises - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets - Annulment by the General Court of the initial decision on the Commission’s approval of the purchaser of the sold assets - Application for suspension of operation of the decision on the further approval of the same purchaser - No urgency - Weighing of interests)

(2012/C 25/103)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Éditions Odile Jacob SA (Paris, France)) (represented by: O. Fréget, M. Struys and L. Eskenazi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, O. Beynet and S. Noë, agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2011) 3503 of 13 May 2011 on the approval of Wendel Investissement SA as the purchaser of the assets sold in accordance with Commission Decision 2004/422/EC of 7 January 2004 declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2978 — Lagardère/Natexis/VUP)),

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 126/17

Order of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-126/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Social security - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Act adversely affecting an official - Implied refusal - Duty to state reasons - Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)

2012/C 126/35

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Curall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment delivered by the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (single judge) on 14 December 2010 in Case F-1/10 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the annulment in part of that judgment.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly devoid of any basis in law.

2. The cross-appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly devoid of any basis in law.

3. Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal.

4. Each party shall bear its own costs of the cross-appeal.

(1) OJ C 120, 16.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/29

Order of the General Court of 9 February 2012 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-500/11) (1)

2012/C 89/50

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 250/20

Order of the General Court of 28 June 2012 — Morison Menon Chartered Accountants and Others v Council

(Case T-656/11) (1)

2012/C 250/38

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 58, 25.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 217/23

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann and Others v Commission

(Case T-379/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Allocation of free greenhouse gas emission allowances from 2013 - Commission decision determining the product benchmarks to apply for the calculation of the allocation of emission allowances - Article 263, fourth paragraph TFEU - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissible)

2012/C 217/49

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH (Duisberg, Germany); Rogesa — Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH (Dillingen, Germany); Salzgitter Flachstaht Gmbh (Salzgitter, Germany); ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG (Duisberg); and voestalpine Stahl GmbH (Linz, Austria) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and C. Dittrich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wilms, K. Hermann and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 130, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH, Rogesa — Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH, Salzgitter Flachstaht Gmbh, ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG, and voestalpine Stahl GmbH are ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

(1) OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 373/6

Order of the General Court of 17 October 2012 — Régie Networks and NRJ Global v Commission

(Case T-340/11) (1)

(Action for damages - State aid - Limitation - Damage for which compensation may be awarded - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)

2012/C 373/10

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Régie Networks (Lyons, France) and NRJ Global (Paris, France) (represented by: B. Geneste and C. Vannini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for damages brought on the basis of Article 340 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants, first, as a result of the unlawful decision of the Commission of 10 November concerning State aid N 679/97 and, secondly, on account of an alleged infringement of the principle of sound administration stemming from a failure on the part of the Commission to compensate for the harmful effects of that decision

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Régie Networks and NRJ Global shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 4 September 2012 — Mische v Parliament

(Case T-642/11 P) (1)

(Appeals - Civil service - Officials - Appointment - Classification in grade - Competition published before the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations of Officials - Distortion of the facts - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(2012/C 331/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Harald Mische (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Holland, J. Mische and M. Velardo, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Jensen and J. Herrmann, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case F-93/05 Mische v Parliament [2011] ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Harald Mische shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Parliament in the present proceedings.

3. The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/26

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2012 — Kronofrance and Kronoply v Commission

(Case T-560/11) (1)

2013/C 32/44

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/69

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2012 — S & S Szlegiel Szlegiel i Wiśniewski v OHIM — Scotch & Soda (SODA)

(Case T-590/11) (1)

2013/C 26/137

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 189/22

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2013 — BybyOKD v Commission

(Case T-559/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Sale by the Czech Republic of its minority shareholding in the company OKD as part of a privatisation - Decision finding no State aid - Professional association - No individual concern - Concept of party concerned - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 189/46

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Sdružení nájemníků BybyOKD.cz (Ostrava, Czech Republic) (represented by: R. Pelikán, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 4927 final of 13 July 2011 concerning the sale to Karbon Invest a.s. of the minority shareholding of the Czech State in OKD a.s. and declaring that that sale did not constitute State aid (State aid No SA.25076 (2011/NN) (OJ 2011 C 225, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Sdružení nájemníků BybyOKD.cz shall pay the costs.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of RPG Industries Limited.

(1) OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 71/27

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2013 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

(Case T-125/11) (1)

2013/C 71/44

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.