ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 58/9

Order of the General Court of 9 January 2012 — Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft v Commission

(Case T-407/09) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Contracts for the sale of apartments as part of the privatisation of publicly-owned apartments in Neubrandenburg - Complaint - Act not subject to review - Inadmissibility - Action for failure to act)

2012/C 58/16

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft mbH (Neubrandenburg, Germany) (represented by M. Núñez-Müller and J. Dammann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by B. Martenczuk and K. Gross, agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Bavaria Immobilien Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. Objekte Neubrandenburg KG (Berlin, Germany); and Bavaria Immobilien Trading GmbH & Co. Immobilien Leasing Objekt Neubrandenburg KG (Berlin) (represented by C. von Donat, lawyer)

Re:

Action, first, for annulment of the Commission decision claimed to be contained in the letter of 29 July 2009 declaring that some contracts concluded by the applicant regarding the sale of apartments as part of the privatisation of publicly-owned apartments in Neubrandenburg did not fall within the scope of Article 87(1) EC and, second, for a declaration of the Commission’s failure to act, under Article 232 EC, since the Commission did not define its position on those contracts on the basis of Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article (88 EC) (OJ 1999 L 83, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2. Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft mbH shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Commission and by Bavaria Immobilien Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. Objekte Neubrandenburg KG and Bavaria Immobilien Trading GmbH & Co. Immobilien Leasing Objekt Neubrandenburg KG.

(1) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/42

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — CNIPT v Commission

(Case T-302/09) (1)

((State aid - Framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented - Financing by voluntary levies made compulsory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 175/57

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Comité national interprofessionnel de la pomme de terre (CNIPT) (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Ledoux and B. Néouze, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, subsequently by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, and finally by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008 concerning State aid No 561/2008, on the framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 129/19

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — UOP v Commission

(Case T-198/09) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 129/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: UOP Ltd (Guildford, United Kingdom)) (represented by: B. Hartnett and O. Geiss, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Talabér-Ritz and T. Scharf, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: IFP (Rueil Malmaison, France) (represented by: E. Morgan de Rivery and A. Noël Baron, lawyers)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2009/157/EC of 16 July 2008 on the aid measure implemented by France for the IFP Group (C 51/05 (ex NN 84/05)) (OJ 2009 L 53, p. 13).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. UOP Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and IFP.

(1) OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 148/51

Order of the General Court of 15 April 2010 — Alibaba Group v OHIM — allpay.net (ALIPAY)

(Case T-26/10) (1)

2010/C 148/90

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.
Order of the President of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Noko Ngele v Commission

(Case T-15/10 R II R)

(Interim Relief - Application for Interim Measures - New Application - Inadmissibility)

(2010/C 288/79)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mariyus Noko Ngele (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Sabakunzi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes, Agent)

Re:

Application for, in essence, a declaration that the Commission minutes of 27 May 2009 ((2009) 1874 final) are unlawful, in so far as it appears therein that the Commission decided to grant legal assistance to one of its former members and to a number of its agents.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed;
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 234/54

Order of the General Court of 5 July 2010 — Prionics v Commission and EFSA

(Case T-112/10) (1)

()

2010/C 234/98

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 55/23

Order of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-38/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Non-contractual liability - Reimbursement of recoverable expenses - Availability of a parallel remedy - Procedural defects - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 55/41

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and L. Currall, agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) delivered on 10 November 2009 in Case F-70/07 Marcuccio v Commission seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Luigi Marcuccio is to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/58

Order of the General Court of 18 October 2010 — Alisei v Commission

(Case T-16/10) (1)

()

2010/C 346/114

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 152/20

Order of the General Court of 25 March 2011 — Noko Ngele v Commission and Others

(Case T-15/10) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Action brought in part before a court which has no jurisdiction - Action inadmissible in part - Absence of causal link - Action in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law - Articles 111 and 114 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court)

2011/C 152/37

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mariyus Noko Ngele (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Sabakunzi, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes, agent), AT (Brussels, Belgium) AU (Brussels), AV (Brussels) and AW (Brussels)

Re:

Action for damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the impossibility of pursuing recovery of a debt owed to him and the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of criminal proceedings instigated against him in Belgium

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed on the basis that it has been brought before a court that has no jurisdiction to hear it, in so far as it is directed against AT, AU, AV and AW.

2. Mr Mariyus Noko Ngele’s head of claim seeking from the Court a declaration that the Centre pour le développement des entreprises (CDE) never replaced the Centre pour le développement industriel (CDI) and that the CDE does not exist in law or have legal personality in Belgium is dismissed on the basis that it is made before a court that has no jurisdiction to hear it.

3. Mr Noko Ngele’s claim that the Court should order that the judgment to be delivered is enforceable is rejected as inadmissible.

4. The action is dismissed as to the remainder as manifestly devoid of any basis in law.

5. Mr Noko Ngele is ordered to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those of the proceedings for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 113/21

Order of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — HIM v Commission

(Case T-316/10) (1)

2011/C 113/44

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 219/17

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2011 — Companhia Previdente v Commission

(Case T-414/10 R)

(Interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application to suspend the operation of a measure - Financial loss - Lack of exceptional circumstances - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 219/25

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Companhia Previdente — Sociedade de Controle de Participações Financeiras S.A. (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: D. Proença de Carvalho and J. Caimoto Duarte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre. V. Bottka and P. Costa de Olivera, Agents, assisted by M. J. Marques Mendes, lawyer)

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Pre-stressing steel) and to dispense the applicant from the obligation to establish a bank guarantee so as to avoid immediate recovery of the fine imposed under Article 2 of that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 173/10

Order of the General Court of 12 April 2011 — Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory v Commission

(Case T-395/10) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 173/22

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Crosby, Solicitor, and S. Santoro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and C. ten Dam, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision refusing to grant the applicant access to certain documents concerning the relations between the European Union and India.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Commission shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/21

Order of the General Court of 1 September 2011 — Communauté de communes de Lacq v Commission

(Case T-132/10) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Concentration - Commission decision declaring compatible the concentration operation for the acquisition of control of Acetex Corp by Celanese Corp. - No undertaking by Celanese to continue the operation of the factory in Pardies (France) - No breach of a rule of law by the Commission - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2011/C 319/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Communauté de communes de Lacq (Mourenx, France) (represented by: J. Daniel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Van Nuffel and N. von Lingen, Agents)

Re:

Claim for compensation for various kinds of harm allegedly suffered by the Communauté de communes de Lacq by reason of unlawfulness and deficiency of the Commission’s behaviour following the concentration operation involving the acquisition of control of Acetex Corp. situated in Pardies (France) by Celanese Corp.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as partially devoid of any foundation in law and as partially manifestly inadmissible.

2. The Communauté de communes de Lacq is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/19

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Cross Czech v Commission

(Case T-252/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities - Letter confirming the findings of an audit report and informing the applicant of the next steps in the procedure - Contractual and non-decision-making character of the letter - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 282/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cross Czech a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Schollaert, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and W. Roels, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission letter of 12 March 2010, reference number INFSO-O2/FD/GVC/Isc D (2010) 208676, confirming the findings of financial audit report 09-BA74-006 concerning the financial statements declared by the applicant over the period 1 February 2005 to 30 April 2008 for three contracts concluded between the applicant and the Commission under the sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European research area and to innovation (2002-06), and informing the applicant of the next steps in the procedure

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Cross Czech a.s. is to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs incurred in the proceedings for interim relief.

(1) OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 355/19

Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro v Commission

(Case T-353/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Debit note - Objection of inadmissibility - Contractual nature of the dispute - Nature of the action - Act open to challenge)

2011/C 355/34

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro (Athens, Greece) (represented by: E. Tzannini, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Sauka, Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of a debit note issued by the Commission on 22 July 2010 for recovery of the sum of EUR 109 415,20 paid to the applicant in the context of financial assistance in support of a medical research project

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE.

(1) OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 331/21

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-239/10) (1)

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Withdrawal of the contested debit note - Cessation of existence of the dispute - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 331/41

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and A. Steiblytė, agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of debit note No 3241001630 of 26 February 2010 concerning Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, incorporating a reduction in the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) assistance granted in application of Commission Decision C(2000) 2349 of 8 August 2000, incorporating approval of the operational programme POR Puglia for the period 2000-2006, on the basis of Objective No 1.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 133/28

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2012 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-101/10) (1)

2012/C 133/55

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) C 113, 1.5.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 49/24

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2011 — Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission

(Case T-203/10) (1)

(State aid - Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations - Existing aid - Decision accepting Member State’s commitments - Decision declaring new aid compatible - Action for annulment - Not individually concerned - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 49/43

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Stichting Woonpunt (Beek, Netherlands); Stichting Com.wonen (Rotterdam, Netherlands); Woningstichting Haag Wonen (The Hague, Netherlands); and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Glazener, E. Henny and T. Ottervanger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, S. Noë and S. Thomas, Agents, and by H. Gilliams, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 (Netherlands) — Existing and special project aid to housing corporations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of Vesteda Groep BV and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed;

3. Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Com.wonen, Woningstichting Haag Wonen and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission;

4. Vesteda Groep and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, applicants for leave to intervene, are ordered to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/44

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2012 — Steinberg v Commission

(Case T-17/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights - Partial refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 26/86

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gerald Steinberg (Jerusalem, Israel) (represented by: T. Asserson, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Tufvesson and C. ten Dam, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision SG.E.3/MV/psi D(2009) 3914 of 15 May 2009, partially refusing the applicant access to certain documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law;

2. Mr Gerald Steinberg shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/23

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2012 — Prima TV v Commission

(Case T-504/10) (1)

2012/C 273/40

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/48

Order of the General Court of 24 June 2014 — PPG and SNF v ECHA

(Case T-1/10 RENV) (1)

((Action for annulment - REACH - Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/81

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG) (Brussels, Belgium), and SNF SAS (Andrézieux-Bouthéon, France) (represented initially by: K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana, and subsequently by R. Cana, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: B. Koopman, acting as Agent); and European Commission (represented by: E. Manhaeve and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of ECHA identifying acrylamide (EC No 201-173-7) as a substance fulfilling the criteria referred to in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1), pursuant to Article 59 of that regulation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG) and SNF SAS shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

3. SNF shall pay the costs relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

4. The Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.