Operative part of the judgment  
The Court:  
1. Dismisses the action;  
2. Orders Mr Marcel Gossio to bear his own costs and those incurred 
by the Council of the European Union;  
3. Orders the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire and the European Commission 
to bear their own costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.  
Judgment of the General Court of 25 April 2013 — 
Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones v OHIM — 
MIP Metro (METROINVEST)  
(Case T-284/11)  ( 1 ) 
(Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Appli ­
cation for Community word mark METROINVEST — Earlier 
national figurative mark METRO — Relative ground for 
refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regu ­
lation (EC) No 207/2009 — Principle of non-discrimination 
— Right to a fair hearing)  
(2013/C 164/28)  
Language of the case: English  
Parties  
Applicant:  Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL 
(Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, P. 
Craddock and B. Vanbrabant, lawyers)  
Defendant:  Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market 
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, 
acting as Agent)  
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:  
MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düs ­
seldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Berger, R. Kaase and J. C. 
Plate, lawyers)  
Re: 
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal 
of OHIM of 17 March 2011 (Case R 954/2010-1), relating to 
opposition proceedings between MIP Metro Group Intellectual 
Property GmbH & Co. KG and Metropolis Inmobiliarias y 
Restauraciones, SL  
Operative part of the judgment  
The Court:  
1. Dismisses the action;  
2. Orders Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL, to pay the 
costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.  Judgment of the General Court of 25 April 2013 — Chen v 
OHIM — AM Denmark (Cleaning device)  
(Case T-55/12)  ( 1 ) 
(Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered 
Community design representing a cleaning device — 
Community three-dimensional mark representing a cleaning 
device fitted with a spraying device and a sponge — 
Declaration of invalidity)  
(2013/C 164/29)  
Language of the case: English  
Parties  
Applicant:  Su-Shan Chen (Sanchong, Taiwan) (represented by: C. 
Onken, lawyer)  
Defendant:  Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market 
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard- 
Monguiral, Agent)  
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, 
intervener before the General Court:  AM Denmark A/S (Kokkedal, 
Denmark) (represented by: C. Type Jardorf, lawyer)  
Re: 
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of 
Appeal of OHIM of 26 October 2011 (Case R 2179/2010-3), 
relating to invalidity proceedings between AM Denmark A/S 
and Su-Shan Chen  
Operative part of the judgment  
The Court:  
1. Dismisses the action;  
2. Orders Su-Shan Chen to pay the costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 133, 5.5.2012.  
Judgment of the General Court of 25 April 2013 — 
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v OHIM (ECO PRO)  
(Case T-145/12)  ( 1 ) 
(Community trade mark — International registration desig ­
nating the European Community — Word mark ECO PRO — 
Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character 
— Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)  
(2013/C 164/30)  
Language of the case: English  
Parties  
Applicant:  Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (Munich, Germany) 
(represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)EN C 164/16 Official Journal of the European Union 8.6.2013
Defendant:  Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market 
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting 
as Agent)  
Re: 
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of 
Appeal of OHIM of 18 January 2012 (Case R 1418/2011-4), 
concerning the international registration designating the 
European Community of the word sign ECO PRO  
Operative part of the judgment  
The Court:  
1. Dismisses the action;  
2. Orders Bayerische Motoren Werke AG to pay the costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.  
Order of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Oster 
Weinkellerei v OHIM — Viñedos Emiliana (Igama)  
(Case T-474/11)  ( 1 ) 
(Community trade mark — Annulment of the opposing trade 
mark — No need to adjudicate)  
(2013/C 164/31)  
Language of the case: German  
Parties  
Applicant:  Andreas Oster Weinkellerei KG (Cochem, Germany) 
(represented by: N. Schindler, lawyer)  
Defendant:  Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market 
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, 
Agent)  
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:  
Viñedos Emiliana, SA (Las Condes, Santiago, Chili)  
Re: 
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of 
Appeal of OHIM of 22 June 2011 (Case R 637/2010-2) 
relating to opposition proceedings between Andreas Oster 
Weinkellerei KG and Viñedos Emiliana, SA.  
Operative part of the order  
1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.  
2. The applicant and OHIM shall bear their own costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 319, 29.10.2011.  Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — PT 
Ecogreen Oleochemicals and Others v Council  
(Case T-28/12)  ( 1 ) 
(Dumping — Imports of certain fatty alcohols and their 
blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia — 
Definitive anti-dumping duty — Adoption of a new regu ­
lation — No longer any interest in bringing proceedings — 
No need to adjudicate)  
(2013/C 164/32)  
Language of the case: English  
Parties  
Applicants:  PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals (Kabil-Batam, Indonesia); 
Ecogreen Oleochemials (Singapore) Pte Ltd, (Singapore, 
Singapore); and Ecogreen Oleochemicals GmbH (Dessau- 
Ro βlau, Germany) (represented by: F. Graafsma and J. 
Cornelis, lawyers)  
Defendant:  Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. 
Hix, Agent, and by G. Berrisch and N. Chesaites, lawyers)  
Re: 
Application for the annulment in part of Council Implementing 
Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 of 8 November 2011 imposing 
a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the 
provisional duty imposed on imports of certain fatty alcohols 
and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia (OJ 
2011 L 293, p. 1), in so far as it imposes an anti-dumping duty 
on PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals.  
Operative part of the order  
1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.  
2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for 
leave to intervene of Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH and Sasol 
Germany GmbH.  
3. The Council of the European Union shall bear, in addition to its 
own costs, those incurred by PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals, Ecogreen 
Oleochemials (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Ecogreen Oleochemicals 
GmbH.  
4. Sasol Olefins & Surfactants and Sasol Germany shall bear their 
own costs.  
( 1 ) OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.EN 8.6.2013 Official Journal of the European Union C 164/17