ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-59/19) (1)

(Action for compensation - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Lack of competence)

(2019/C 399/81)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Ehab Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by A. Jaume and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the adoption of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16) and its subsequent implementing acts, and as a result of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/806 of 17 May 2019 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2019 L 132, p. 36), in so far as those decisions concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Ehab Makhlouf shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Nowhere v EUIPO — Junguo Ye (APE TEES)

(Case T-12/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2020/C 61/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nowhere Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japon) (represented by: A. Norris, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Junguo Ye (Elche, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 October 2018 (Case R 2474/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Nowhere and Mr Ye.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 18 November 2019 — Lantmännen and Lantmännen Agroetanol v Commission

(Case T-79/19) (1)

(2020/C 19/70)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 131, 8.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — WV v EEAS

(Case T-43/19) (1)

(Action for compensation - Civil service - Civil servants - Out of time - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 103/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: WV (represented by É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the EEAS’s decision of 28 March 2018 rejecting the applicant’s application for compensation and, in so far as necessary, the EEAS’s decision of 26 October 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 26 June 2018; and second, compensation in respect of the harm that the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of the EEAS’s conduct towards her.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. WV is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.
Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Parliament and Council

(Case T-162/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Internal market for electronic communications - Retail price charged to consumers for regulated intra-EU communications - Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 - Legislative act - Applicants not individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 77/73)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Telefónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) and Telefónica de España, SAU (Madrid) (represented by: F. González Díaz, B. Langeheine and J. Blanco Carol, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: R. van de Westelaken, M. Peternel and C. Biz, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: O. Segnana and I. Gurov, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU for the partial annulment of Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Agency for Support for BEREC (BEREC Office), amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 (OJ 2018 L 321, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission.

3. Telefónica, SA and Telefónica de España, SAU shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.

4. Telefónica, Telefónica de España, the Parliament, the Council, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Commission shall each bear their own respective costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(1) OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — Merly v Parliament

(Case T-505/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistant - Special leave for the birth of children born via surrogacy - Answer to a request for information - No act adversely affecting an official - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 191/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Grégory Merly (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: T. Oeyen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Windisch and C. González Argüelles, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the alleged decision of the Parliament of 30 October 2018 refusing to grant the applicant special leave, equivalent to maternity leave or to the special leave to which adopted parents are entitled.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Mr Grégory Merly shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 305, 9.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 March 2020 — Necci v Commission

(Case T-129/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Civil service - Contract staff - Social security - JSIS - Rejection of the application for membership - Out of time - Substantial new fact - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 175/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Claudio Necci (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Van Pottelberge and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Meyer and M. Alver, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 18 April 2018 implicitly rejecting the application for membership of the sickness insurance scheme common to the institutions of the European Communities (JSIS), made by the applicant on 18 December 2017.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Claudio Necci shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 April 2020 — Anglo Austrian AAB and Belegging-Maatschappij ‘Far-East’ v ECB

(Case T-797/19 R-II)

(Interim measures - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Decision to withdraw authorisation as a credit institution - Further application - Article 160 of the Rules of Procedure)

(2020/C 247/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Anglo Austrian AAB AG, formerly Anglo Austrian AAB Bank AG (Vienna, Austria), Belegging-Maatschappij ‘Far-East’ BV (Velp, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Fischer, J. Willheim, M. Ketzer and O. H. Behrends, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta, E. Yoo and V. Hümpfner, agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the implementation of the decision of 14 November 2019, ref: ECB-SSM-2019-AT-8, WHD-2019-0009, by which the European Central Bank withdrew the authorisation of Anglo Austrian AAB Bank AG as a credit institution from the date of notification of the decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the application.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 April 2020 — Aquind and Others v Commission

(Case T-885/19 R)

(Application for interim relief - Energy - Trans-European energy infrastructure - Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 - Commission Delegated Regulation amending Regulation No 347/2013 - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

(2020/C 201/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Aquind Ltd. (Wallsend, United Kingdom), Aquind Energy Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Aquind SAS (Rouen, France) (represented by: S. Goldberg, C. Davis and J. Bille, Solicitors, and by E. White, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, Y. Marinova and B. De Meester, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of the Commission Delegated Regulation of 31 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of projects of common interest of the Union.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Koopman International v EUIPO — Tinnus Enterprises and Mystic Products (fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-842/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Suspension of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 348/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by G. van den Bergh and B. Brouwer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by A. Odle, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the provisional decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 September 2019 (Case R 1010/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mystic Products Import & Export and Koopman International, on the one hand, and Tinnus Enterprises, on the other hand.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Koopman International BV shall pay its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Tinnus Enterprises LLC.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Perfect Bar v EUIPO (PERFECT Bar)

(Case T-563/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark PERFECT Bar - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptive character– Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision - Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2020/C 262/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Perfect Bar LLC (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: F. Miazzetto, J.L. Gracia Albero, R. Seoane Lacayo and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2019 (Case R 372/2019-5), relating to the application for registration of the figurative sign PERFECT Bar as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. Orders Perfect Bar LLC to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 17 August 2020 — BF v Commission

(Case T-190/19) (1)

(Action for failure to act - State aid - Operation of water supply and sanitation facilities - Preliminary examination of alleged State aid granted by the German authorities - Second invitation to act - Commission’s position - Second subparagraph of Article 12(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Article 24(2) of Regulation 2015/1589 - Time limit for bringing an action - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 371/11)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: BF (represented by: S. Gesterkamp, lawyer, and C. Koenig, Professor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková and K.-P. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to adopt a decision closing the preliminary examination procedure regarding alleged State aid granted by the German authorities to both company A and company B.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. BF shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2020 — Solar Ileias Bompaina v Commission

(Case T-143/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Hellenic Republic — Operators on the market in electricity produced from renewable energy sources - Power purchase agreements - Legislative amendments with retroactive effect limiting tariff advantages - Complaint to the Commission alleging aid in favour of energy suppliers - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Status as an interested party - Safeguarding of procedural rights - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 348/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Solar Ileias Bompaina AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: A. Metaxas and A. Bartosch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K.-Ph. Wojcik and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking, in essence, the annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2018) 6777 final of 10 October 2018 concerning State aid SA.38967 (2014/NN-2) — Greece — National operating aid scheme in favour of installations using renewable energy sources and highly efficient combined power and heat installations.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Solar Ileias Bompaina AE is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2020 — Militos Symvouleftiki v Commission

(Case T-536/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of services in the field of the organisation of communication activities on behalf of the Commission’s Representation in Greece - Annulment of the call for tenders - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 35/65)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Militos Symvouleftiki AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: K. Farmakidis-Markou, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 29 May 2019 to annul call for tenders PR/2018-16/ATH concerning the provision of services in the field of the organisation of communication activities on behalf of its Representation in Greece.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Militos Symvouleftiki AE shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.
Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — L. Oliva Torras v EUIPO — Mecánica del Frío (Vehicle couplings)

(Case T-629/19) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a coupling to hitch refrigeration or air conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle - Ground for invalidity - Failure to comply with the requirements for protection - Articles 4 to 9 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal - Pleas in law referring to the grounds of another decision - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2021/C 9/29)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: L. Oliva Torras, SA (Manresa, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Mecánica del Frío, SL (Cornellá de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: J. Torras Toll, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 July 2019 (Case R 1399/2017-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between L. Oliva Torras and Mecánica del Frío.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. L. Oliva Torras, SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by EUIPO and by Mecánica del Frío, SL.

(1) OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 April 2021 — Target Ventures Group v EUIPO — Target Partners (TARGET VENTURES)

(Case T-274/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Declaration of surrender of the contested trade mark - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 252/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Target Ventures Group Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: T. Dolde and P. Homann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Target Partners GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Klett and C. Mikyska, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 (Case R 1685/2017-2), relating to cancellation proceedings between Target Ventures Group and Target Partners.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Target Ventures Group Ltd and Target Partners GmbH shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 12 February 2021 — Staciwa v Commission

(Case T-511/19) (1)

(2021/C 138/70)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Diageo and Others v Commission

(Case T-473/19) (1)

(2021/C 513/51)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2021 — GABO:mi v Commission

(Case T-881/19) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Sixth and Seventh Framework Programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006 and 2007-2013) - ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) - Grant agreements - Set-off of claims - Identification of the defendant - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 452/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Mayer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André, M. Ilkova, L. Mantl, and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 272 TFEU seeking an order that the Commission reimburse the eligible costs incurred by the applicant, first, between August 2015 and April 2016 and, secondly, during the period of the preliminary insolvency proceedings, namely EUR 1 680 681,82, plus interest of EUR 76 552,60, in respect of the grant agreements awarded under the sixth and seventh framework programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities and the ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 5 December 2022 — Eland Oil & Gas v Commission

(Case T-471/19) (1)

(2023/C 45/57)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 21 June 2022 — BAE Systems v Commission

(Case T-773/19) (1)

(2022/C 303/74)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Order of the President of the General Court of 24 June 2020 — Price v Council

(Case T-231/20 R)

(Interim measures - Area of freedom, security and justice - Decision (EU) 2020/135 - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom - Loss of EU citizenship - Application for suspension of operation - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility - Referral to the Court of Justice - Not competent)

(2020/C 313/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: David Price (Dorat, France) (represented by: J. Fouchet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking partial suspension of the operation of Council Decision (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 1), and of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 7), in so far as those acts do not permit the applicant to retain his EU citizenship, or, at the very least, partial suspension of the operation of Article 127(1)(b) of that agreement, and, second, application based on the second subparagraph of Article 256(3) TFEU seeking a stay of the proceedings and a referral to the Court of Justice in order to put questions to it for a preliminary ruling.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.