ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/17

Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — Glaxo Group v OHIM — Farmodiética (ADVANCE)

(Case T-243/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 6/32

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Glaxo Group Ltd (Greenford, United Kingdom) (represented by: O. Benito and C. Mansell, Solicitors)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Farmodiética — Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, Lda (Estarda de S. Marcos, Portugal)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2011 (Case R 665/2010-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Farmodiética — Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, Lda and Glaxo Group Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Glaxo Group Ltd shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 347/33

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 September 2011 — Gollnisch v Parliament

(Case T-346/11 R)

(Interim measures - Waiving of the immunity of a member of the European Parliament - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 347/57

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch (Limonest, France) (represented by: G. Dubois, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Passos, D. Moore and K. Zejdová, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of the European Parliament of 10 May 2011 waiving the applicant’s immunity.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 80/26

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Ghost Brand v OHIM — Procter & Gamble International Operations (GHOST)

(Case T-298/11) (1)

2012/C 80/45

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 39/13

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2011 — Ahouma v Council

(Case T-138/11) (1)

(Death of the applicant - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 39/26

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Brouha Nathanaël Ahouma (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and C. Fekete, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36), and of Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate.

2. The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

3. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene made by the European Commission and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire.

(1) OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 133/26

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2012 — Modelo Continente Hipermercados v Commission

(Case T-174/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid schemes allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of aid - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 133/51

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Modelo Continente Hipermercados, SA, sucursal en España (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed;

2. Modelo Continente Hipermercados, SA, sucursal en España, is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 109/13

Order of the Judge of the General Court hearing applications for interim measures of 16 February 2012 — Morison Menon Chartered Accountants and Others v Council

(Case T-656/11 R)

(Interim relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

2012/C 109/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Morison Menon Chartered Accountants (Dubai, United Arab Emirates); Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Dubai Office (Dubai); and Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Sharjah Office (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: H. Viaene, T. Ruys and D. Gillet, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-M. Joséphidès and S. Kyriakopoulou, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of, first, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2001 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11) and, second, Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), in so far as they add to the list of persons and entities whose funds and economic resources are to be frozen the entity known as ‘Morison Menon Chartered Accountants’.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 273/8

Order of the General Court of 4 July 2012 — TME v Commission

(Case T-329/11) (1)

(Public service contracts - Call for tenders in relation to the rehabilitation of the Bucharest wastewater treatment plant, jointly financed by the ISPA structural funds - Allegedly unlawful decision of the Romanian authorities to reject the tender submitted by the applicant - Refusal of the Commission to open a financial adjustment procedure with respect to Romania - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 273/13

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: TME SpA — Termomeccanica Ecologia (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Malinconico, S. Fidanzia and A. Gigliola, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and P. van Nuffel, Agents)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 20 April 2011 concerning the complaint of TME SpA in respect of infringements of European Union law by Romania in the context of the project ‘Bucharest Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation: Stage I ISPA 2004/RO/16/P/PE/003-03’, inherent in the restructuring of the Bucharest wastewater treatment plant [D(2011)REGIO.B3/MAD] and, second, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2. TME SpA — Termomeccanica Ecologia shall bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 217/29

Order of the General Court of 5 June 2012 — Iberdrola v Commission

(Case T-431/11) (1)

2012/C 217/61

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 399/21

Order of the General Court of 23 October 2012 — Chivas v OHIM — Glencairn Scotch Whisky (CHIVAS LIVE WITH CHIVALRY)

(Case T-180/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Opposition withdrawn - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 399/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chivas Holdings (IP) Ltd (Paisley, Renfrewshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Carboni, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Glencairn Scotch Whisky Co. Ltd (Glasgow, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Lumsdaine, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2011 (Case R 1262/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Glencairn Scotch Whisky Co. Ltd and Chivas Holdings (IP) Ltd.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener are each ordered to bear their own costs and to pay half the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 319/10

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2012 — Gozi v Commission

(Case T-519/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Request for assistance - Commission decision not to reimburse to the applicant the costs incurred in proceedings before a national criminal court - Appeal partly clearly inadmissible and partly clearly unfounded)

2012/C 319/17

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Sandro Gozi (Soglianó Al Rubicone, Italy) (represented by: G. Passalacqua and G. Calcerano, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, agents)

Re:

Appeal against judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 20 July 2011 in Case F-116/10 Gozi v Commission, not yet reported, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Sandro Gozi is ordered to bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

(1) OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/26

Order of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Cementos Molins v Commission

(Case T-424/11) (1)

2013/C 38/48

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/47

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2012 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Real Seguros (real,- BIO)

(Case T-549/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of earlier national trade marks - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 26/94

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Real Seguros, SA (Porto, Portugal)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 August 2011 (Case R 115/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Real Seguros, SA and MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The parties shall bear their own costs incurred before the General Court.

(1) OJ C 6, 7.1.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 225/83

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2013 — SRF v Council

(Case T-407/11) (1)

2013/C 225/188

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 86/17

Order of the General Court of 5 February 2013 — BSI v Council

(Case T-551/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Extension of anti-dumping duty imposed on the imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia - Independent importer - Article 263, fourth paragraph of TFEU - Lack of individual concern - Legislative measure containing implementing measure - Inadmissible)

2013/C 86/27

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Brugola Service International Srl (BSI) (Cassano Magnago, Italy) (represented by: S. Bariatti and M. Farneti, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and P. Mahnič Bruni, Agents, assisted initially by G. Berrisch and M. de Morpurgo, then by G. Berrisch, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. França and D. Grespan, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 of 18 July 2011 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not (OJ 2011 L 194, p. 6).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Brugola Service International Srl (BSI) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3. The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 370, 17.12.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/18

Order of the General Court of 27 January 2014 — Commission v OHIM — Ten ewiv (TEN)

(Case T-658/11) (1)

2014/C 78/35

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 336/21

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2013 — Altadis v Commission

(Case T-400/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of the aid - Act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - No obligation to recover - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 336/43

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Altadis, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2011/282/EU of 12 January 2011 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions No C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 135, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed;

2. Altadis, SA is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 380/10

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2014 — Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse eV v Commission

(Case T-112/11) (1)

((Action for annulment - Registration of a protected geographical indication - ‘Edam Holland’ - No interest in bringing proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 380/13

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Loschelder and V.Schoene, lawyers)

Defendant: The European Commission (represented by: initially, G. von Rintelen and M. Vollkommer, then G. von Rintelen and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: The Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, J. Langer, M. Noort, B. Koopman and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents); and Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie (Zoetermeer, the Netherlands) (represented by: P. van Ginneken, F. Gerritzen and C. van Veen, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1121/2010 of 2 December 2010 entering a designation in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Edam Holland (PGI)] (OJ 2010 L 317, p. 14).

Operative part of the order

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Schutzgemeinschaft Milch und Milcherzeugnisse eV shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Kingdom of the Netherlands and Nederlandse Zuivelorganisatie shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/27

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — France v Commission

(Case T-511/11) (1)

((State aid - Measures taken by Interbev - Financing by voluntary contributions made mandatory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 184/47

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: initially E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, J. Rossi and J. Gstalter, then E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, D. Colas and J. Bousin, Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, C. Urraca Caviedes and S. Thomas, then B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/131/EU of 13 July 2011 on levies for Interbev (OJ 2012 L 59, p. 14).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 – Oppenheim v Commission

(Case T-586/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/61)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sal. Oppenheim jr. & Cie AG & Co. KGaA (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: initially, W. Deselaers, J. Brückner and M. Haisch, then, T. Bernard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche, M. Adam and M. Noll-Ehlers, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Noll Ehlers and finally, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Sal. Oppenheim jr. & Cie AG & Co. KGaA;

3. The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 27 April 2016 — GDC Engineering v Commission

(Case T-614/11) (1)

(2016/C 222/43)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 39, 11.2.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 184/13

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Investigación y Desarrollo en Soluciones y Servicios IT v Commission

(Case T-134/12 R)

(Application for interim measures - Financial assistance - Research and development - Recovery of advance payments made - Application for suspension of operation - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 184/24

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Investigación y Desarrollo en Soluciones y Servicios IT, SA (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: M. Jiménez Perona, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the Commission’s measure, notified by letter of 13 January 2012, revoking several subsidies granted to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 373/13

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2012 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-260/12) (1)

2012/C 373/26

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 250, 18.8.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 295/32

Order of the General Court of 6 August 2012 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-82/12) (1)

2012/C 295/56

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/27

Order of the General Court of 6 December 2012 — Netherlands and ING Groep v Commission

(Joined Cases T-325/12 and T-332/12) (1)

2013/C 32/49

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 141/26

Order of the General Court of 12 March 2013 — Lafarge v Commission

(Case T-49/12) (1)

2013/C 141/49

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber (extended composition) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 71/22

Order of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Alfacam and Others v Parliament

(Case T-21/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public service contracts - Procurement procedure - Supply of audiovisual services to the Parliament - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Articles 94 and 103 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) no 1605/2002 - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2013/C 71/34

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Alfacam (Lint, Belgium); Via Storia (Schiltigheim, France); DB Video Productions (Aartselaar, Belgium); IEC (Rennes, France) and European Broadcast Partners (Eubropa) (Aartselaar) (represented by: B. Pierart, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: P. López-Carceller and C. Braunstein, and subsequently by: P. López-Carceller and G. Hellinckx, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 18 November 2011 to award lot No 1 in the call for tenders EP/DGCOMM/AV/11/11 relating to the provision of audiovisual services within the Parliament in Brussels (Belgium) to watch tv and of the Parliament’s decision of 18 November 2011 rejecting Eubropa’s bid for that lot.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.