ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/61

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2014 — Lebedef v Commission

(Case T-356/13 P) (1)

((Appeals - Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary measure - Downgrading - Appeal manifestly inadmissible and manifestly unfounded))

2014/C 315/102

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 24 April 2013 in Lebedef v Commission (F 56/11, RecFP, EU:F:2013:49), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. M. Giorgio Lebedef is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

(1) OJ C 298, 12.10.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/33

Order of the General Court of 14 May 2014 — Seatech International and Others v Commission

(Case T-500/13) (1)

2014/C 235/44

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 377, 21.12.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/26

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — Zehnder v OHIM — UAB ‘Amalva’ (komfovent)

(Case T-577/13) (1)

2014/C 329/42

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/56

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2014 — SCA Tissue France v Commission

(Case T-237/13) (1)

((Application for annulment - Environment - Directive 94/62/EC - Packaging and packaging waste - Directive 2013/2/EU - Rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 315/95

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: SCA Tissue France (Bois-Columbes, France) (represented by: J. M. Leprêtre and N. Chahid Nouraï, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J. F. Brakeland, acting as Agents

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2013/2/EU of 7 February 2013 amending Annex I to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste (OJ 2013 L 37, p. 10), in so far as the Commission adds rolls, tubes and cylinders around which flexible material is wound, with the exception of those intended as parts of production machinery and not used to present a product as a sales unit, to the list of examples of products illustrating the application of criteria that define the concept of ‘packaging’.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible..

2. SCA Tissue France is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 409/65

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — AEMN v Parliament

(Case T-679/13) (1)

2014/C 409/88

Language of the case: French

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 85, 22.3.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 361/29

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — AbbVie v EMA

(Case T-29/13) (1)

2014/C 361/44

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 431/45

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2014 — Ratioparts-Ersatzteile v OHIM — Norwood Promotional Products Europe (NORTHWOOD professional forest equipment)

(Case T-622/13) (1)

(2014/C 431/71)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 448/21

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2014 — Ben Ali v Council

(Case T-166/13) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia - Freezing of funds - Extension - Consequences of an annulment of earlier freezing of funds measures - No need to adjudicate - Non-contractual liability - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2014/C 448/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali (Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, France) (represented by: A. de Saint Rémy, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and A. De Elera, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, an application for annulment of Council Decision 2013/72/CFSP of 31 January 2013 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2011 L 32, p. 20), in so far as that decision concerns the applicant and, secondly, an application for the payment of damages

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the pleas seeking annulment of Council Decision 2013/72/CFSP of 31 January 2013 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia, in so far as that decision concerns Mr Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali.

2. The remainder of the action is dismissed.

3. Mr Ben Ali and the Council of the European Union are each ordered to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/25

Order of the General Court of 21 January 2015 — Richter + Frenzel v OHIM — Ferdinand Richter (Richter + Frenzel)

(Case T-418/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 089/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Richter + Frenzel GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Altenburg, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: A. Pohlmann, and subsequently by: D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Ferdinand Richter GmbH (Pasching, Austria) (represented by: M. Grötschl, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2013 (Case R 2001/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Ferdinand Richter GmbH and Richter + Frenzel GmbH + Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs of the defendant.

(1) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 26/31

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2014 — Theophilou v Commission and ECB

(Case T-293/13) (1)

((Action for annulment and compensation - Stability support programme for Cyprus - Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the ESM - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Causal link - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 026/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Christos Theophilou (Nicosia, Cyprus); and Eleni Theophilou (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Paschalides, Solicitor, and A. Paschalides, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders and J.-P. Keppenne, Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Re:

First, application for annulment of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 of the Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) on 26 April 2013, and, second, for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the inclusion of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 in the Memorandum of Understanding and an infringement of the Commission’s supervisory obligation.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Mr Christos Theophilou and Ms Eleni Theophilou shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

(1) OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 228/12

Order of the General Court of 18 May 2015 — Out of the blue v OHIM — Mombauer (REFLEXX)

(Case T-48/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 228/14)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Out of the blue KG (Lilienthal, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and I. George, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially A. Poch and subsequently S. Hanne, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Meinhard Mombauer (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Vohwinkel, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2012 (Case R 1656/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Out of the blue KG and Meinhard Mombauer

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each of them shall pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 155/37

Order of the General Court of 11 March 2015 — Sanctuary Brands v OHIM — Richter International (TAILORBYRD)

(Case T-594/13) (1)

(2015/C 155/44)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 78/35

Order of the General Court of 9 December 2015 — BT Limited Belgian Branch v Commission

(Case T-335/13) (1)

(2016/C 078/48)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 245, 24.8.2013.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/58

Order of the General Court of 28 August 2015 — Bimbo v OHIM — Kimbo (Caffè KIMBO GOLD MEDAL)

(Case T-638/13) (1)

(2015/C 381/70)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 8 October 2018 — alfavet Tierarzneimittel v EUIPO — Millet Innovation (Epibac)

(Case T-613/13) (1)

(2018/C 436/89)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 144/60

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2017 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-554/13) (1)

(2017/C 144/85)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 320/31

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 July 2015 — GSA and SGI v Parliament

(Case T-321/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Fire security, assistance to persons and external surveillance at the European Parliament’s site in Brussels - Rejection of the bid made by a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency))

(2015/C 320/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Gruppo Servizi Associati SpA (GSA) (Rome, Italy) and Security Guardian’s Institute (SGI) (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) (represented by: E. van Nuffel d’Heynsbroeck, avocat)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: P. López-Carceller and B. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, in essence, for suspension of operation, first, of the decision of 12 June 2015 in which the Parliament declared non-compliant the tender submitted by the applicants in respect of the tendering procedure for service contract EP/DGSAFE/UIB/SER/2014-014 for the provision of fire security, assistance to persons and external surveillance at the European Parliament’s site in Brussels, and, secondly, the decision by which that contract was awarded to the company Securitas.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is rejected.

2. The order of 25 June 2015 in Case T-321/15 R is cancelled.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 221/22

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 May 2015 — Costa v Parliament

(Case T-197/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Former Member of the European Parliament - Person in receipt of a Members’ retirement pension - Recipient of an allowance as a President of a port authority - Rule against cumulation - Recovery of the pension received - Debit note - Application for a stay of enforcement - Infringement of the formal requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 221/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Paolo Costa (Venice, Italy) (represented by: G. Orsoni and M. Romeo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and G. Corstens, Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay of enforcement of debit note No 2015-239 (Reference 303074) of the European Parliament of 23 February 2015, ordering the applicant to pay the sum of EUR 49 770,42 by 31 March 2015 at the latest.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 16/38

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2015 — Compagnia Trasporti Pubblici and Others v Commission

(Case T-187/15) (1)

((State aid - Undertaking operating a network of bus connections in the Region of Campania - Compensation for the public service obligations paid by the Italian authorities following a judgment of the Consiglio di Stato - Commission decision declaring the measure incompatible with the internal market - Action brought by undertakings in a situation analogous to that of the aid recipient))

(2016/C 016/47)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Compagnia Trasporti Pubblici (Naples, Italy); Atap — Azienda Trasporti Automobilistici Pubblici delle Province di Biella e Vercelli SpA (Biella, Italy); Ferrovie Appulo Lucane Srl (Bari, Italy); Asstra — Associazione Trasporti (Rome, Italy) and Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV) (Rome) (represented by: M. Malena, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, G. Conte and P.J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1074 of 19 January 2015 on State aid SA.35842 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Italy — Additional public service compensation for CSTP (OJ 2015 L 179, p. 112).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2. Compagnia Trasporti Pubblici; Atap — Azienda Trasporti Automobilistici Pubblici delle Province di Biella e Vercelli SpA; Ferrovie Appulo Lucane Srl; Asstra — Associazione Trasporti and Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV) shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 190, 8.6.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 381/43

Order of the President of the General Court of 1 September 2015 — Alcimos Consulting v ECB

(Case T-368/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Economic and monetary policy - Decisions adopted by the Governing Council of the ECB - Provision of emergency liquidity assistance to Greek banks - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Breach of procedural requirements - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 381/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Alcimos Consulting SMPC (Athens, Greece) (represented by: F. Rodolaki, avocat)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decisions of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank of 28 June and 6 July 2015 concerning the level of emergency liquidity assistance provided to Greek banks.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
3.

Proforec Srl shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission other than those relating to the applications for leave to intervene.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 38/58

Order of the General Court of 23 November 2015 — Slovenia v Commission

(Case T-118/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Time-limit for bringing an action - Starting point - Out of time - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 038/78)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: L. Bembič, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Rous Demiri and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2014/950/EU of 19 December 2014 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2014 L 369, p. 71), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Republic of Slovenia.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action as inadmissible.

2. Holds that there is no need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Italian Republic, the French Republic and Hungary.

3. Orders the Republic of Slovenia to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4. Orders the Republic of Slovenia, the Commission, the Italian Republic, the French Republic and Hungary to bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C 146, 4.5.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 175/16

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 February 2016 — ICA Laboratories and Others v Commission

(Case T-732/15 R)

((Application for interim measures - Environment - Consumer protection - Regulation fixing maximum residue levels for guazatine - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2016/C 175/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ICA Laboratories Close Corp. (Century City, South Africa); ICA International Chemicals (Proprietary) Ltd (Century City); and ICA Developments (Proprietary) Ltd (Century City) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, R. Crespi, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1910 of 21 October 2015 amending Annexes III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for guazatine in or on certain products (OJ 2015 L 280, p. 2).

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 156/47

Order of the General Court of 11 March 2016 — Amrita and Others v Commission

(Case T-439/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Agriculture - Protective measures against pests of plants - Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 156/63)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Amrita Sarl (Scorrano, Italy) and the 28 other applicants whose names are included in the Annex to the order (represented by: L. Paccione and V. Stamerra, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 of 18 May 2015 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) (OJ 15 L 125, p. 3), where appropriate after having declined to apply Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (OJ 2000 L 169, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Amrita Sarl and the 28 other applicants whose names are included in the Annex are ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 20 April 2016 — Dima v EUIPO (Shape of an open cubic box)

(Case T-383/15) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Form of an open cubic box - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 222/26)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dima Verwaltungs GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Kerkhoff, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Schikfo, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2015 (Case R 2568/2014-5) concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of an open cubic box as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Dima Verwaltungs GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 191/30

Order of the General Court of 14 March 2016 — Sopra Steria Group v Parliament

(Case T-181/15) (1)

((Public service contracts - Decision of the Parliament to launch a negotiated procedure without publication of a contract notice for the provision of IT services - Withdrawal of the act - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 191/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sopra Steria Group SA (Annecy-le-Vieux, France) (represented by: A. Verlinden, R. Martens and J. Joossen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Tapper Brandberg and B. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision to use the negotiated procedure PE/ITEC-NPE-15.8 without prior publication of a contract notice for the provision of IT services to the Parliament and to other institutions and agencies of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Parliament is to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.