ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 402/35

Order of the General Court of 27 September 2017 — Gaki v Europol

(Case T-366/16) (1)

((Action for annulment and damages - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Applications seeking an injunction - Manifest inadmissibility - Manifest lack of jurisdiction - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 402/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Anastasia-Soultana Gaki (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: initially by A. Heinen, and subsequently by G. Keisers, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann and S. Ryder, acting as Agents, and by R. van der Hout and P. Lux, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU requesting that, in essence, Europol be ordered to undertake certain actions, and seeking annulment of the decision of the Joint Supervisory Body of Europol of 4 May 2016 concerning a complaint filed by the applicant, and application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Ms Anastasia-Soultana Gaki is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 382/61

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Omnicom International Holdings v EUIPO — eBay (dA/tA/bA/y)

(Case T-393/16) (1)

(2017/C 382/75)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eight Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 83/23

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — fritz-kulturgüter v EUIPO — Sumol + Compal Marcas (fritz-wasser)

(Case T-862/16) (1)

(2018/C 083/35)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 32/32

Order of the General Court of 23 November 2017 — Nf Nails In Vogue v EUIPO — Nails & Beauty Factory (NAILS FACTORY)

(Case T-886/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 032/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nf Nails In Vogue, SL (Arganda del Rey, Spain) (represented by: L. Jáudenes Sánchez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and E. Scheffer, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Nails & Beauty Factory GmbH, formerly Nails & Beauty Vertriebs GmbH (Kiel, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2016 (Case R 202/2016-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nf Nails In Vogue and Nails & Beauty Vertriebs.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Nf Nails In Vogue, SL.

(1) OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 190/29

Order of the General Court of 11 April 2018 — ABES v Commission

(Case T-813/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Grants from the Portuguese authorities to an entity providing social services for the elderly - Preliminary examination procedure - Decision finding no State aid - Action challenging the merits of the contested measure - No substantial effect on the competitive position - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 190/51)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: ABES (São Pedro de Tomar, Portugal) (represented by: N. Mimoso Ruiz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. França and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo and M. J. Castanheira Neves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 5054 final of 9 August 2016 on State Aid SA.38920 (2014/NN), declaring, after the preliminary examination stage, that the grant awarded to Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Tomar does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Abes — companhia de assistência, bem-estar e serviços para seniores, Lda is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3. The Portuguese Republic is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 123/21

Order of the General Court of 1 February 2018 — Collins v Parliament

(Case T-919/16) (1)

((Privileges and immunities - Member of the European Parliament - Decision not to defend the privileges and immunities - Action manifestly inadmissible - Manifest lack of jurisdiction - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2018/C 123/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Jane Maria Collins (Hotham, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Anderson, solicitor)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alonso de León and M. Dean, Agents)

Re:

Concerning, first, an action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 25 October 2016 not to defend the immunity and privileges of the applicant, secondly, an action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly incurred as a result of that decision and, thirdly, a request that the General Court should rule on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of the applicant

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. Jane Maria Collins is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those of the European Parliament.

(1) OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — L’Huillier v Gollnisch and Parliament

(Case T-624/16 TO) (1)

((Third-party proceedings - Rejection of the third-party applicant’s application to intervene - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 103/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Third-party applicant: Guillaume L’Huillier (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: A. Varaut, lawyer)

Applicant in the main proceedings: Bruno Gollnisch (Villiers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer)

Defendant in the main proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and L. Vétillard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Third-party application against the judgment of 7 March 2018, Gollnisch v Parliament (T-624/16, not published, under appeal, EU:T:2018:121).

Operative part of the order

1. The third-party application is dismissed.

2. Mr Guillaume L’Huillier shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

3. Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs.

(1) OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 30 May 2018 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi)

(Case T-664/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant - Replacement of a party to the proceedings - Transfer of the rights of the EU trade mark applicant - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant for replacement - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 392/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: PJ (represented by: S., lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, and subsequently by A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2016 (Case R 1670/2015-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Erdmann & Rossi and PJ.

Operative part of the order

1. The action shall be dismissed as inadmissible.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the application for replacement.

3. PJ is to pay the costs.

4. [Y]-GmbH, and each party, is to bear its own costs relating to the application for replacement.

(1) OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Tsilikas v Commission

(Case T-514/16) (1)

(2021/C 252/50)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 388, 3.11.2014 (case originally registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-74/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — CMS (CMS Italy)

(Case T-161/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark CMS Italy - Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding to the left - Relative grounds for refusal - Reputation of the earlier marks - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Evidence of reputation - Previous decisions of EUIPO recognising the reputation of the earlier marks - Taking account of those decisions - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of sound administration)

(2019/C 246/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Costruzione Macchine Speciali Srl (CMS) (Alonte, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2016 (Case R 229/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Puma and Costruzione Macchine Speciali (CMS).

Operative part of the order

1. The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 January 2016 (Case R 229/2015-2) is annulled.

2. EUIPO shall pay the costs, including those incurred by Puma SE.

(1) OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/35

Order of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — TeamLava v EUIPO — King.com (Icônes animées)

(Case T-77/17)

(2017/C 178/57)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 231/54

Order of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Consorzio IB Innovation v Commission

(Case T-126/17) (1)

(2017/C 231/72)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/22

Order of the President of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Le Pen v Parliament

(Case T-86/17 R)

((Interim measures - Member of the European Parliament - Recovery by offsetting of allowances paid as reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 178/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marion Anne Perrine Le Pen (Saint-Cloud, France) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi and J.-P. Le Moigne, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: G. Corstens and S. Seyr, acting as agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of the operation of the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 5 December 2016 declaring that the sum of EUR 298 497,87 had been unduly paid to the applicant and had to be recovered from her as well as debit note No 2016-1560 of 6 December 2016 adopted pursuant to that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 369/19

Order of the General Court of 12 September 2017 — Gelinova Group v EUIPO — Cloetta Italia (galatea…è naturale)

(Case T-90/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 369/28)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Gelinova Group Srl (Tezze di Vazzola, Italy) (represented by: A. Tornato and D. Hazan, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Cloetta Italia Srl (Cremona, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 December 2016 (Case R 207/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Cloetta Italia Srl and Gelinova Group Srl, formerly Milk & Fruit Srl.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2. Gelinova Group Srl is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1) OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 293/36

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 July 2017 — António Conde & Companhía v Commission

(Case T-244/17 R)

((Interim measures - Fishing vessel - Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization - Admissibility - Application for interim measures - Lack of interest))

(2017/C 293/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: António Conde & Companhía, SA (Gafanha de Nazaré, Portugal) (represented by: J.R. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, A. Lewis and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures ordering the European Commission to abstain from exerting pressure on the Republic of Portugal to exclude the fishing vessel Calvão from the list of Portuguese-flagged vessels authorised to fish in the NAFO regulatory area.

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 52/30

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2017 — Le Pen v Parliament

(Case T-284/17) (1)

((Action for annulment and compensation - Institutional law - Member of the European Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Decision to withdraw parliamentary immunity - No longer any locus standi - No need, in part, to adjudicate - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law))

(2018/C 052/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marion Anne Perrine Le Pen (Saint-Cloud, France) (represented initially by: M. Ceccaldi, and subsequently by: R. Bosselut, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Dean and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Firstly, application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision P8_TA(2017)0056 of the Parliament of 2 March 2017 to withdraw the applicant’s parliamentary immunity and, secondly, application on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment of Decision P8_TA(2017)0056 of the Parliament of 2 March 2017 to withdraw the parliamentary immunity of Ms Marion Anne Perrine Le Pen.

2. The remainder of the action is dismissed.

3. Ms Le Pen shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Parliament.

(1) OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 424/59

Order of the General Court of 18 October 2017 — Ecolab Deutschland and Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann v ECHA

(Case T-243/17) (1)

(2017/C 424/83)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 182/23

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2018 — UD v Commission

(Case T-574/17) (1)

((Civil Service - Recipient of a survivor’s pension - Social security - Rejection of a request for prior authorisation with a view to obtaining reimbursement of certain medical expenses - New request - Purely confirmatory document - Time limit for bringing an action - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 182/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: UD (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and M. Mensi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of the Commission refusing to grant the applicant prior authorisation to obtain reimbursement of certain medical expenses.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. UD shall bear her own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 112/32

Order of the General Court of 1 February 2018 — ExpressVPN v EUIPO (EXPRESSVPN)

(Case T-265/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark EXPRESSVPN - Absolute ground for refusal - Application for alteration - Single head of claim - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 112/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ExpressVPN Ltd (Glen Vine, Isle of Man) (represented by: A. Muir Wood, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 February 2017 (Case R 1352/2016-5), concerning the international registration designating the European Union No 1 265 562 of the figurative mark EXPRESSVPN.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. ExpressVPN Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 202, 26.6.2017.
Case T-425/17: Order of the General Court of 12 June 2018 — Capo d’Anzio v Commission

Order of the General Court of 12 June 2018 — Capo d’Anzio v Commission

(Case T-425/17) ( 1 )

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

( 1 ) OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.
Case T-666/17: Order of the General Court of 17 April 2018 — NeoCell v EUIPO (BIOACTIVE NEOCELL COLLAGEN) (EU trade mark — Legal person governed by private law — No evidence of legal existence — Article 177(4) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)

Order of the General Court of 17 April 2018 — NeoCell v EUIPO (BIOACTIVE NEOCELL COLLAGEN)

(Case T-666/17) ( 1 )

‛(EU trade mark — Legal person governed by private law — No evidence of legal existence — Article 177(4) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)’

Parties

Applicant: NeoCell Corporation (represented by: M. Edenborough QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2017 (Case R 147/2017-2), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark BIOACTIVE NEOCELL COLLAGEN.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed.

2. NeoCell Corporation shall pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — Sky v EUIPO — Parrot Drones (Parrot SKYCONTROLLER)

(Case T-288/17) (1)

(2018/C 381/39)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2018 — Kim and Others v Council

(Case T-742/17) (1)

(2018/C 301/62)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.
Order of the General Court of 20 September 2018 — Leino-Sandberg v Parliament

(Case T-421/17) (1)

(Access to documents - Document relating to a decision refusing a third party full access to trilogue tables relating to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Europol and repealing Decisions 2009/371/JHA and 2005/681/JHA - Refusal to grant access - Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Exception for the protection of court proceedings - Disclosure after the action had been brought - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2018/C 427/91)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Päivi Leino-Sandberg (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: O. Brouwer and S. Schubert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos, S. Alves and L. Anagnostopoulou)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Decision A(2016) 15112 of the European Parliament of 3 April 2017 refusing to grant the applicant access to Decision A(2015) 4931 of the Parliament of 8 July 2015 addressed to Mr Emilio De Capitani.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action brought by Ms Päivi Leino-Sandberg.

2. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene lodged by the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden.

3. Each party shall bear its own costs, including those incurred in respect of the applications to intervene.

4. The Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden shall each bear their own costs. A copy of this order shall be transmitted to them.

(1) OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Gratis iç ve Dis Ticaret v EUIPO (gratis)

(Joined Cases T-495/17 and T-496/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Applications for EU figurative marks gratis - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2018/C 427/92)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Gratis iç ve Dis Ticaret AȘ (Istanbul, Turkey) authorised to replace Sedes Holding AȘ (represented by: K. Ongena and C. Du Jardin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Vuijst and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Re:

Actions brought against the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 May 2017 (Cases R 506/2017-2 and R 507/2017-2) concerning the applications for registration of the figurative signs gratis as EU trade marks.

Operative part of the order

1. The actions are dismissed.

2. Gratis iç ve Dis Ticaret AȘ shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.
Official Journal of the European Union

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2018 — Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft v EUIPO — C & C IP (T)

(Case T-379/17) (1)

(2019/C 44/110)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.