ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(77)398
Vol.1977/0131

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement (CEE,Euratom) n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernant l'ouverture aupublicdesarchiveshistoriques delaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement (CE,Euratom) n°1700/2003 du22septembre 2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003, p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation (EEC,Euratom) No354/83of1February 1983
concerning theopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropean Economic
Community andtheEuropean AtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983, p.1),as
amended byRegulation (EC,Euratom) No1700/2003 of22September 2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003, p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary, classifieddocuments inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformity withArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung (EWG,Euratom) Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar 1983überdieFreigabe derhistorischen Archive derEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom) Nr.1700/2003 vom22.September 2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003, S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit
erforderlich, wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenannten Verordnung freigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COM(77)398 final.
Brussels,28July1977
FIFTHREPORT OffTHEACTIVITIES
ONTHE
EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND
1977FINANCIAL TEAR
REPORT FRCMTHECCMMISSIOST TOTHECOUNCIL ANDTHEEUROPEAN "
^-PARLIAMENT

TABL3 OFCCMTELTTS
Page
FOREWORD 1
INTRODUCTIOU 2
I.ACTIVITIES BYFIELDSOPINTERVENTION 5
PersonsleavingApiculture 5
PersonsworkingintheTextileand.ClothingSectors 8
MigrantWorkers 10
YoungPeople 15
TheHandicapped 20
Regions 24'
Technical Progress 29
GroupsofUndertakings 31
II.REGIONAL IMPACTOPTHESOCIALFUND 32
III.PILOTEXPERIMENTS ANDPREPARATORY STUDIES .34
IV.EFFECTIVES SOPAID •40
V.IMPROVEMENT INMANAGEMENT OPTHEFUND 42
VI.SOCIAL FUNDADVISORY COMMITTEE 43
VII.FINANCIAL ANDBUDGETARY ASPECTS 44
%
.ANNEXES
I.Budget1976 52
IIEuropeanSocialFund.Summaryofoperations
adoptedfor1976-inm.u.a.Brealcdoun "byMember 53
Statesand"bySectors
III.Summaryofauthorisations forcommitments mthe
1976financial yearformulti-annual operations54

AITIT3X2S(conta.)
r*pον
IV,lireakdoun ofaidfront5irSocialFundpercountryof
originofpromoters (coiairiiiicnta ) 55
V.Pcsynonts fromSuropcnn SocialPund.crec^cdoijn acoording
tocountryoforiginofpronotors
VI.European Conaniuiitioo Budgetfor1977enddraftbudget
for197Gand1979(coivmitinents ) 57
VII.EuropeanSocialFuiid-Trendsin"budgetary allocations 58
VIII.Listofpreparatory studiesandpilotschemesassisted
from1977Budget 59
IX.Listofapplications agreedin197^ 62

1
FOREWORD
ThisistheannualreportoftheSocialFundfortheyearl?7o
submitted "bytheCommission totheEuropeanParliament andthe
Councilinaccordance withArticle 6ofCouncilRegulation (EEC)
Fo858/72(l)whichreadsasfollows :
"EveryyeartheCommission shall,"before1July,submittothe
CouncilandtotheEuropean Parliament areportontheactivities
oftheFundduringthepastfinancial yearandonthedevelopment
foreseeable intheconingthreeyearsinexpenditure relatingto
measures takenpursuanttoArticles 4and5theCouncilDecision
71/66/EEC."
Thereportisbasedonthepresentation usedlastyearwhichwas
welcomed bytheEuropeanParliament (2).Anattempthasbeenmade,
however,towardsgreaterclarityandtoprovideadditional inform­ationinaccordance withtheParliament *srequest(3).
Examples ofextramaterial included forthefirsttimearethe
overallfinancial impactoftheFundontheless-developed regions
oftheCommunity ;thenumbersofpeoplebenefitting fromthe
variousfieldsofinterventions ,andthebreakdown ofpayments
according toMemberState.
Twootherpolicydocuments ,however,thoughnotstrictlyrelevant
tothecontentofthisreportbecausetheypost-date theperiod
covered,f.cmpartofthematerial necessary tocomplete anup-to-
datepioti'.:eofpolicies pursuedthroughtheFund.Theseare:
(a)theCommission'scommunication totheCouncilconcerning
thereviewoftherulesgoverning thetasksandoperations
oftheSocialFund(4)and
(b)theCommission *sguidelines forthemanagement oftheEuropean
SocialFundfortheyear1977(5)*
(1)OJIToL101,28April1972,p3
(2)Resolution of21April1977(paz*»l)
(3)Resolution of21April1977(par.14)
(4)COM(77)90of29March1977
(5)OJNoC141,15JuneI977,p2

IîTTRODUCTÏ OIT
1.Withtheslow-down mtheeconomic recovers' -whichhadstartedinthe
secondhalfof1975andtheconsequent increaseinunemployment from
under5millioninthesummerof1976tothe5«5*millionmark "bythe
endoftheyear,theemployment marketbackground againstwhichthe
SocialFundhadtobeoperatedin1976was,perhajjs,themostcritical
yetexperienced .
2.Thesituation ofacoupleofyearsagowhereincertainfieldsof
intervention applications fellshortofbudgetary allocations isnow
completely reversedwithprogrammes submitted in1976morethan
doublingthebudget(441m.u.a.).
3.Thenumberofpersonsdirectlybenefitting fromprogrammes approvedin
1976forassistance fromtheFundisestimated atabout650,000 ;ofthese
about10,000maybeexpectedtohaveamultiplier effectastheywere
eitherteachers orsocialworkersreceiving furthertraining .
4.TheCommission 1sgeneralpolicyduring1976,asinpreviousyears,was
toensureanactiverolefortheFundincontributing towardsthepromotion
ofCommunity employment policybyfavouring programmes vdthwelldefined
andclearlyvisibleobjectives ,initiatives vathacatalytic orpromotional
effectandsuitable schemesunlikelytohavebeencarriedoutwereitnot
fortheprovision offinancing fromtheFund.
5.Althoughthebudgetre'ached441m.u.a.in1976theamountisnomorethan
asmallfraction ofmanyMemberStates *expenditure onvocational training.
ThisiswhytheCommission favoursincreasing thedegreeofconcentration
intheuseofavailable resources tohelp,forexample,inthecorrection
ofstructural imbalances betweenthevariousregionsoftheCommunity .
TheFundRegulations provideforassistance tooperations carriedoutin
thelessdeveloped regionsoftheCommunity (l).Asaresultofthistype
ofintervention ,justoverhalfofthetotalFundwasexpendedfor
operations intheE.R.D.F. regions(2).Otherfieldsofintervention
11 11 •1 11 '
Art.5CouncilDecision 71/66/EEC
Regionsdesignated byMemberStatesfortheapplication oftheirsystems
ofregionalaid.SeeArticle3ofCouncilRegulation EEC724/75establishing theEuropeanRegionalDevelopment Fund(E.R.D.F. )3

authorised arebasedoncategories ofpersonsratherthangeographic
location (l).Whenoneaddstheproportion ofthi3lattertypeof
actionwhichinfactwascarriedoutintheE.R.D.F. regions,the
totalfinancial impactoftheSocialFundonCommunity RegionalPolicy
in1976isestimated atatleast735"ofitstotalbudget.
6.Althoughthevastmajority oftraining progj/v.-.ninesapprovedforassistance
fromtheFundin1976wererelatedtospecificjobprospects ,therewas
atendencyinthepresentsituation ofhighunemployment tousethe
..Fund,particularly inless-developed regions,tocombatunemployment
byfinancing training whichwasnotalwaysdirectlylinkedtoimmediate
employment . ' f
7.Progress wasalsoachievedduring1976inimproving theefficiency of
theadministration oftheFondandthevolumeofpaymentsattained almost
trebledthatofthepreviousyears.Thereare,however,verydefinite
limitstowhatcanbeachievedinthisregardwithoutchangesinthe
regulations governing theadministration oftheFund.
8.Theforegoing considerations oftheincreasing thedegreeofconcentration
oftheFund011thelessdeveloped regionsandthemostvulnerable categories
ofworkerandimproving efficiency wereamongtheissuestakenupby
theCoraMssion inconnection withthereviewoftherulesgoverning
thetasksandoperations oftheEuropean SocialFund.
9.The-onlychangeinareasofintervention oftheFundduring1976was
theadditionofclothingtothetextilesseotorbythedecisionofthe
Councilon9February 1976(2).
Theotherareasofintervention authorised underArticle4ofCouncil
Decision71/66/EECremainedunchagedduring1976atworkersleaving
6£M.fctflture ;migrantworkers^youngworkers;andthehandicapped
,t.(demonstration projectsandtrainingofinstructors).Unlikeinter­
ventions "underArticledoS.CouncilDecision 71/66/EEC(operationsin
tin&elxl'dVelOped regionsor'regionsindecline jingroupsofundertakings
orconnected withtechnical progress)thefieldsofintervention under
ι "»
^ljArt.4CouncilDecisiónfÍ/66/EF3
(2)Decision76/206/EEC;OJNOL3of14February1976,p39
1

4
Article4aregenerally authorised onatemporary basis(l)requiring
periodic renewalthroughdecision oftheCouncil.
10..Inallcasesexceptworkersleavingagriculture ,theCouncildecisions
expireinmid-1977 *TheCommission hassubmitted aproposaltothe
Council,inthecontextofitsopinion onthereviewoftheFund,to
removethetime–limitsindecisions relatingtoArticle 4»This
proposalisaccompanied byasuggestion thattheCommission should
revieweachyear,intheAnnualReport,theneedforthemaintenance
ofthevariousfieldsofintervention ,makingproposals foramendment
wherenecessary .Asaninterimmeasure,theCommission proposed an
extension ofthevalidity ofthesefieldsofintervention upto
31December 1977*
(l)thesoleexception beingactionsforworkersleavingagriculture .

5
I.ACTIVITIES EfFIELD0?IM'ERVT^TION
PERSONS LEAVIMJ AGRICULTURE
Volumeofapplications
31.TheSocialFundisauthorised "byCouncilDecision 72/428/EEC(l)to
intervene toassistpersonsleavingagriculture totakeupemployment
inothersectors.Thepersistence ofhighlevelsofunemployment in'
theindustrial andservicessectorsduring1976hashadtheeffect
ofstabilising themovement ofworkersfromthelandatalowerlevel
thanwasthecasesomeyearsago.Thisisreflected intheslight
reduction ofprogrammes submitted whichamountedto$1m-u.a.ascomparer!
withabout52.5m.u.a.in1975•Moreover ,therehasbeenatendency ,
asyetofslightproportions ,incertainregionsoftheCommunity ,for
workerstoreturntotheagricultural sector.Althoughthenumberof
personstrainedforex-agricultural activity withassistance fromthe
SocialFundhasslightly diminished thereliasbeenagrowinginterest
onthepartofyoungpeople,usuallybutnotexclusively froman
agricultural background ,totrainforagriculture .
Thisfieldofintervention islinkedtotextiles andclothingforbudgetary
purposeswithanaggregate allocation of66.1m.u.a.in1976.
Generalcharacteristics ofapplications
12.Thebiggestapplications bothintermsoffinancial aidrequested and
numberstrainedwerethosesubmitted bynationaltrainingauthorities ,
representing ,inmostMemberStates,generaltraining programmes not
specifically relatedtoworkersinagriculture .
InFrance,however,theapplications didconcernoperations carriedout
aspartofanational programme 1oonfinedtothetraining ofagricultural
workers.•Thiswasalsothecase,butonlytosomeextent,forItaly,
whoseapplications tendedtorelatetoregional programmes .
•./.
(1)0JfloL291of28December1972,pI58

13.Amongthemoreinteresting programmes ,inqualityifnotinquantity ,
mentionshouldbemadeofthoseaimedatthere-employment inthe
sameareaofagricultural workersforcedtochangejobsortoadd
othermeansoflivelihood tothatofagriculture .Suchprogrammes ,
carriedoutaspartofthedevelopment ofunderdeveloped agricultural
regions ,andinparticular mountain areas,weretypically concerned
withtraining forjobslinkedwithagriculture suchasrural
development ,craft-work andtourismendavoiding workers''havingto
leavehometolearnalivelihood ,
14.Itisestimated thatatleast50/^ofthepersonsincludedinthe
generalprogrammes werebeingretrained forthebuilding andmetal-work
sectors .
Guidelines usedforselection ofapplications
15.TheCommission ,decidedthatthesituation inthisfieldofintervention
didnotcallforanybasicchangeintheguidelines applicable inthe
previous year.Thebasicconcern wastosupporttheobjectives of
Community agricultural policyandofregional development through
assistance foractivities aimedatreducing depopulation throughthe
creation ofstableemployment inruralzones.
16.Firstpriority was,therefore ,accordedtothefollowing applications :
-thosecarriedoutindeclining orbackwardruralareasassupport
measurestoinvestments aimedatcreating employment ;
-thoseformingpartofprogrammes designedtopermitlocalre-employment
offarmworkersinnon-agricultural activities aimedatdevelopment
inless-favoured areas,providedthatsuchprogrammes guaranteed a
reasonable levelofskillandstability intheemployment offered ;
-thosewhichguaranteed suitable employment forless-favoured groups
ofworkers ;theperiodofassistance fromtheFundtobeginwithin
twoyearsafterthecessation ofactivities inagriculture }

–thoseconcerning familyworkers,whichincludes youngpersons
unemployed orunder-employed sinceleavingschoolandwives
ofagricultural workers whowishtohaveajoboutsideagriculture
eveniftheirhusbands oontinuetobeemployedinthissector.
Applications meetingthoserequirement samountedtoabout20.7m.u.a.
foroperations in1976,13»9m.u.a.for1977and7*0m.u.a.for
1978.
Resettlement operations withnotraining contentwereplaoedin
secondpriority ,butduetobudgetary constraints noolaimswere
approvedinthiscategory.
Beneficiaries
Programmes accepted undertheex–agricultural headingin197*5
totalling 41.6m.u.a.andareestimated tobenefitapproximately
42,000persons.

PERSONS WORKING INTHETEXTILE ANDCLOTHING SECTORS
Volumeofapplications
TheCouncilDecision authorising SocialFundintervention forworkers
inthetextileindustry wasextended ontheoccasion ofitsrenewal
on9February 1976(l)tocoveralsotheclothingindustry.Theresult
wasaconsiderable increaseinapplications whichamountedto38m.u.a.
Asmentioned inparagraph 11,thejoint "budgetary provision forthis
fieldofintervention aswellasworkersleavingagriculture was
66f1m.u.a.
Generalcharacteristics ofapplications
Theeffectsofthecrisiswhichhasaffected employment inthetextile
industry forseveralyearscontinued tobemanifestin197°;theannual
lossofjobssincethesignature ofmulti-fibre agreement (2)in
January 1974averages 200,000.Effortsarebeingmadetotransform the
textileindustry ,traditionally characterised byhighlabourcontentat
relatively lowwages,intoacapitalintensive industry usingmodern
technology .Thisrestructuring isconstantly hampered byashortage
ofsuitablyqualified workersandtheintervention oftheFundisaimed
bothathelpingtoremedythisandattraining workersforcedtofind
jobsinothersectors.Theapplications fromthememberstateswere,
consequently ,gearedtothesetwoobjectives ,withthemainemphasis
onpersonsobligedtoleavethissector.Programmes whichweresubmitted
fromallmemberstates,exceptBelgiumaridDenmark ,camefromthepublio
trainingauthorities ,professional organisations andprivatefirms.
Theyconsisted ,inthemain,ofgeneral ,globalprogrammes basedon
budgetary estimates foroneormoreyears?.ndinvolving oneormorecurrent
branches ofactivity ofthenational employment services .Inaccordance
withtherequirements demanded foraidfromtheFund,theseapplications
specifythenumbersoftextileandclothing workersenvisaged forthe
training coursesorbenefitting fromothereligible measures .The
programmes donotmakeitpossible ,however,tojudgethetypeoftraining
(l)OJNoL3,14February 1976,P>39
(2)0JNoL118,30April1974,P

imparted ortheindustrial restructuring towhich itisrelated .As
regards thequality ofthetraining andtheemployment prospectives
offered ,onecanonly refer tothenorms andpractices inoperation in
thevarious promotional organisations .These programmes donot ,therefore ,
lend themselves tooverall assessment ortotheimplementation in
practice ,oftheCommission ^wish ,asexpressed initsguidelines for
themanagement oftheFund ,tofavour industrial restructuring ofa
kind inwhich Community production islikely to "becompetitive with
third countries .Moreover ,theadditionality aspect ofFund aidis
notreadily discernible inthese programmes .
Guidelines used for selection ofapplications
21.The Commission considered that the selection criteria established in
1975 forthis field ofintervention should continue toapply .Selection
was ,therefore ,confined to
(1)retraining andrestructuring promoting thedevelopment ofbranches
which offered thebest possible use ofskilled labour andinwhich
Community production stood thebest chance ofmeeting competition from
third countries ;and
(2)co-ordinated re-deployment operations forming part ofajoint action
between firms laying offworkers andfirms inother branches guaranteeing
their reemployment .
Priority wasaccorded tothose programmes which corresponded closest to
theaims ofregional development .
Forthereasons explained inparagraph 20above ,national global
applications gave rise todifficulties ofassessment andthey were approved
iristages ,asthepromoters submitted further information todemonstrate
conformity with thecriteria .
Beneficiaries
22.Applications totalling 14»8m.u.a .wereapproved forprogrammes beginning
in1976 ,aswell as4.6 m.u.a .for1977 and 2m.u.a .in1978 .
...These areestimated tobenefit almost 34,000 persons .

10
NTGRANTWORKERS
Volumeofapplications
23.During1976i',10position ofmigrantworkersintheCommunity continued tobe
subjecttotheverycritical labourmarketsituation ,withmanyunemployed
workersreturning homeandtherestrictions onfreshimmigration fromthird
countries beingmaintained .Inspiteofthis,however ,thetotalsizeofthe
migrantpopulation didnotdecreasesignificantly ,mainlybecauseofthe
increasing extenttowhichmigrantworkerswerejoinedinthehostcountries
bymembersoftheirfamilies .Therewereindications !alsoreflected in
applications totheSocialPond,ofincreased activitytoassistmigrants-
particularly thoseofthesecondgeneration -toadapttothenewsocialand
workingenvironment .
Againstthisbackground thevolumeofeligibleapplications forassistance from
theFundin1976formigrantworkers(l)increasedto61m.u.a.asagainst
42m.u.a.in1975*
Generalcharacteristics ofapplications
24•Specialised teaching ofchildren ofmigrant workers
Thegreaterpartoftheapplications concerned coursesofspecialised teaching
forthechildren ofmigrants .Thehostcountries arerecognising moreandmore
thateducation forchildren ofmigrantworkerscannotbeeffective simplyby
placingmigrantchildren innormalschoolclassesbutthatspecialreception
andadaptation programmes arenecessary inordertointegrate thesechildren
successfully intotheneweducational system.Thevolumeoftheseapplications
exceeded byfarthetotalbudgetforoperations infavourofmigrants .
./•
(l)Councildecisionof27June1974onactionbytheEuropeanSocialFund
formigrantworkers(74/327/EEC)OjNoLI85,9July1974.P20.

11.
2'scily.XJiiitcd CorsioayandthoNetherlands submitted comprehensive
globalapplications inthisfieldvhoreaalimitedindividual achernesvgre
prosentod byBalgiuaandDenmark.
Irrtepratenpro/TTammea
SeveralItalianapplications ,inoluding thatmentionediathepreceding
paragraph andthesingle"Irishprojeotweresubmittedinthefrcaseworkof
integrated programmes linkingseveralphasesofaotions *Suohintegrated
programmes aredefinedinthe.CounoilDecision(l)asextending to
allthemeasures nece'&sary toensuretheeffectiveness andcontinuity of
actionthroughout successive phasesofmigration frompreparation for*
emigration toreturntothacountryoforigin.
Operations ,whiohformpartofouohintegrated progresses ,dosignedto
facilitate thoemployment endgeographical andprofessional nobility of
workersmovingfromoneMemberStatetoanotherareeligibleforassistance *
Thevolumeofapplications linkedtointegrated programmes phowedamarked
increaseduring197^andamountedtoapproximately 11m.ii.a.Includedweremeasures
aidingresettlement inthecountryoforiginreflecting atendency towardsthe
• ♦
reversal ofthemigratory flowoftraditionally emigrantcountries.
TheCommission favoursintegrated programmes notonlybecaupoofthesooial
advantage inhelpingmigrantsthroughthevariousstagesofmigration from
preparation fordeparture toeventualreturnhemebutalsobecausethisis
themosteffective meansofmootingmanpowerrequirements inthehostcountry
aswellashelpingthoregionaldevelopment requirements ofthecountryof
origin*
(1)Artiolo1ofCounoildecision74/327/EEC

Otherprorrammeo (l)
Therewasasubstantial numberofapplioations forotheroo1;lono
assisting migrants whiohwerenotrelatedtointegrated programmes
inthesenseofthepreceding paragraph )theceoonoerned aotiono
foradaptation ofmigrantstotheirworkingandlivingconditions
inthehostcountry.Theyinoludedassistance tomigrantsfrcathird
countries whereasintegrated programmes arelegallyconfinedin
soope–forsocialFundpurposes–topersonsmovingfromoneCommunity
oountrytoanother.
Programmes underthiqheadingwereconcentrated onemployment pro­
blemsandveryoftencombined withlanguagetraining.Whereasthe
UnitedKingdomandCormanyinoluded theseoperations ingeneral
applications ,&numberofprivatepromoters inFranoeaswella«a
voluntary organisation inGermanysubmitted separatespeoifio pro­
grammes,aimedatpreparing youngmigrantsforworkwhohadjustloft
schoolandwouldotherwise beunlikelytofindajob*
Theseprogrammes usuallyinoludedrevision ofsohoolstudiesinadequately
followed,languagetraining,vocational preparation andguidanoo *
Trainingofteachers andeooialwork^roformlrrantBf9}
Alimitednumberofapplications inthefieldofspecialtraining and
advanoedtraining ofteachersformigrants *ohildren andsocialworkers
responsible forintegration measuresformigrantswassubmitted byGermany
FranceandtheKetherlands *Aparticularly interesting sohemewasJointly
presented byprivateorganisations inGermanyandItalyconcerning the
training ofItalianwelfareworkersworkingmainlyforItalianmigrants
inGermany.Aoompletetraining ooursetailoredtotheepeoialneedsof
ItalianmigrantsinGermanywasdeveloped forthiscpr&s?oftrolf&rovorkor
(1)Article2ofCounoildecision74/327/eBC
(2)Artiole3ofCounoildeoisioa74/^27/EEO

13.'
bringingtheirqualifications iptothelevelofreoognised sooialworkers*
Thfsj"training programmes inoludedalso'notionsoonoorning *«lnteg?atioa
problemsofmigrantsreturning toItaly*
* *
Guidelines usedfortheselection ofapplications
28.TherelevantCounoilDeoision 74/372/EECprovidesforassistaaoefarthree
kindsofaotionoonoerning migrantsvist
–Integrated programmes (asexplainedinpar.25)
–■integration measures(seepar.26) _*'
–basioandadvanoedtraining ofsooialworkersandteaohers *
29.Integrated programmes ,asinthepreoeding year,wereolassified as
firstpriorityin1976*MeasuresnotformingpartofIntegrated programmes ,
tohelpmigrants adapttothenewsooialandworkinglifewereregarded as
firstpriority onlytotheextentthattheyweredesignedtoleadto«nploy*>
ment.Inthiscontextspeoialattention wasgiventoprogrammes forjoaag
migrants under23yearsofageaswellaslanguageoourses.
Oneothereategorywasolassified asfirstpriority,namelytraining
programmes forteachers andsooialworkersassisting migrants andtheir
children.Theseoperations haveanobviousalthoughnotplearlyaeaqgrable
multiplier effeot*
Applications deemedtomeetfirstpriorityrequirements ,amountedtoabout
21m.u.a.foroperations in1976,14m.u.a.for1977and12m.u.a.for1978»
30.Booauseofshortageoffunds,teachingooursesformigrant'schildrenwhloh'
...._wer»e#notpartofintegrated programmes hadtoberelegatedtoseoondpriority.

14
Withinthiscategoryitwasfurthernecessary torestrict assistance
tocaseswhereFundaidoouldheregarded ashavingapromotional
effect,wheretheactionswerecomplementary tomeasuresundertaken
"bytheMinistries concerned orwereinthenatureoffollow-up
activities vitalforthesuccessofschooladaptation measures.
Thisresultedintheadmission underthisheadingofanumberof
specialised teaching coursesrelatingtotheperiodafterthefirst
yearofcompulsory schooling inthehostcountry.
Thetotalfinancial commitment forolaimspassedinsecondpriority
wasabout0.5m.u.a.foroperations in1976;0.1m.u.a.for1977and
0.5m.u.a.for1978*
Beneficiarios
Itisestimated thatapplications approvedin197^willcontribute to
theschooling ofsome125,000childrenintheCommunity ;tolanguage and
training coursesforabout50,000adultmigrants ;andtothetraining of
sane2,5000teachers andsocialworkers.Migrantsbenefitting fromthe
information andguidanceservices approvedforfinancing in1976are
estimated atmorethanonemillion.

15
YOTOTGPEOPLE
Volumeofapplications
32.During1976,measurestotackleyouthunemployment weregiventoppriority by
manpowerauthorities inmostMemberStates,withtheresultthatmanytraining
programmes wereexpanded andnewschemesintroduced duringthecourseofthe
year,particularly inanticipation ofthenewwaveof1976schoolleavers
joiningtheranksofthoseyoungpeoplewhohadalreadybeenunemployed for
severalmonths.Thishighandeverincreasing leveloftrainingactivityin
theMemberStateswasinevitably translated intoaverylargevolumeofapplica­
tionstotheSocialFundin1976.-
The1976financial year,whichwasthefirstfullyearofoperation ofthe
Councildecision onintervention bytheFundforyoungunemployed people(l)
wastherefore markedtryaparticularly difficult budgetary situation inwhich
eligibleapplications forassistance exceededtheoriginal budgetary provisions
bymorethanfivetimes.Thiscameasanabruptchangetotheexceptionally
favourable situation attheendof1975whenithad"beenpossibletoapprove
alleligibleapplications foroperations inthelastquarteroftheyear.(2)
Thebudgetary situation wassomewhatrelieved bythedecision oftheCommission
inMay1976tomakeavailable foryoungpeopletheextraappropriations
originally intended foranewfield"Fundintervention underArticle 4of
CouncilDecision71/66/EECinseotorsaiidregionsaffected trytheeconomic
crisis.(3)ThefailureofthisproposaltoobtainapprovalfromtheCouncil
permitted asubstantial increaseinthebudgetary allocation foryoungpeople
fromsome38to69million -unitsofacoount,butseriousproblemsofselection
stillremained .
Generalcharacteristics ofapplications
Promoters
33*Thevastmajority oftheapplications receivedforyoungunemployed people
cbnoerned thetraining andvocational preparation programmes launched bythe
MemberStatesintheframework ofspecialmeasurestocombatyouthunem­
ployment.Theseprogrammes ,whichweregenerally
(1)Councildecision onactiontrytheEuropeanSocialFundforpersonsaffected
byunemployment difficulties (75/459/EEC)OJHOL1190,30July1975»P36.
(2)Seethe1975anualreportoftheSocialFundCOM(76)338final,pp5and24.
(3)Seep1ofthe1975annualreportoftheSocialFundCOM(76)338final

16
nationalinsoopeandconsequently verysizeable-runningtoasmanyas
40,000youngsters inasingleprogramme -werenormallyundertheresponsi­
bilityofthepublictrainingauthorities .Onlyfouroftheeligible
applications 'camefromprivatelawbodies*Luxembourg wastheonly
KcmberStatenottopresentanyapplications underthe'youngpeople*
heading *
OD.icctives
Thespeoialnational programmes submitted totheFundreflected
twomainpreoccupations ofthetraining andmanpowerauthorities *Ontha
onehand,therewastheimmediate needtoincreasethenumberoftraining
placesavailable foryoungpeople,whetherbymobilising sparetraining
capacityinpubliccentresandinpublioenterprise or,mostoften;by
offeringincentives toprivateemployers toinorease,oratleastmaintain,
tholevelofskilledtraining opportunities andon-»th»-jobtraineeships in
6piteofthegeneralcutbackineoonomioaotivity *Ontheotherhand,thers
wasalsoaooncerntodevelopamoreJ.ongternapproaohtotheunderlying
problems ofthetransition fromsohooltowork,whiohprompted manytraining
andeduoational authorities tointroduce innovatory schemesofbasio
training andpre-enplqyment oourses *
Beneficiaries
Thevariousprogrammes oonoentrated almostexclusively ontheunder-20 age
group,givingparticular attention totheneedsoftheleastqualified
youngsters ,leavingschoolattheminimumageandunlikely evenin
normaleconomiocircumstances tobeinterested in,letalonebeeligiblefor,
thetraditional formsofvocational training *Applications oonoerning both
first-jobseekersandyoungpeoplewhohadalreadyworkedwerelimitedto
Belgium,ConnanyandDenmark *Theestimated numberofgirlsandyoung
womencovered Ijytheapplications submittedduring1976amountedtoonly
about20^ofthetotal,althoughtheirunemployment ratewasatleast
ashighasthatofyoungmeninthesameagegroup*Itmaybeobserved
thatgirlsarestillrarelyinvolvedinapprenticeships andskilled
training coursesbutaregenerally wellrepresented inthevarious
typesofvocational preparation programmes forunemployed youngpeople*
Oftheestimated 110,000youngpersonswhobenefitted during1976fro«
training progammes approvedundertheSocial-Fond *nearly ofthatnumber
werelocated theE*R*D*P «Begions *

17.
Guidelines usedfortheselection ofapplications
35,Asindicatedabove,noprecedents existedfrom1975for
the6eleotion 6fyoungpeopleapplications *Guidelines therefore had
tobedeveloped fromscratohatthebeginning of1976andagainsta
background ofahighlyunfavourable anduncertain budgetary situation *
Thereferenoe intherelevent Counoildeoisiontoapriority oategory
ofyoungpeopleinaearohofafirstjobwasstriotlyappliedwiththe
inevitable resultthatprogrammes involving youngpeoplewhohad
alreadyworked,eveniftheywerewellunder20yeareoldhqdnoohanoe
ofapprovalunderArtiole4CounoilDecision71/66/eHC"bulfc,insofax*as
th«yoccurredinpriorityregions,werei,nsomecasesoonsid<9r*jdforaidwider
Article5ofthesameDecisis(regionalinterventions ).
Nationaldefinitions ofwhatconstitutes afirstjobseekerinthe
variouscountries havebeendooepted onaprovisional basiswhileattempts'
aremadetoestablish acommonly aooeptable Community definition *
3)5.Withintheoategoxyoffirstjobseekers,andtakingaooountofthe
decisiontoinoreasetheappropriations available,afurtherseleotion of
applications wasstillneoessary *Inestablishing guidelines rthebasiq
oonoemoftheCommission afteroonsultation withtheSooialPondCommittee wai
toshowadearpreference tothemorereoentinitiatives totaokleth«
problemsofyouthunemployment ,therebyemphasising thepromotional
vocationofSocialFundaotion,(l)ratherthangivesupporttoongoing
well-established training programmes *
3q,Civenthisbasioorientation ,afurtherdistinotion wasmade,
forbudgetary reasons,betweenthoseoperations whiohofferedamore
longt-tormqualitative interestandthoseprogrammes whiohwereessentially
i
(l)"Suppl«aentazy guidelines fortheadministration oftheEuropean8ooia^Fttnfiapproved bv ««»<onon2)July1Q75(doo«VA242/75)

designedtotaoklethequantitative aspectsofproviding trainingfacilities for
tmcaployedyoungpeople.
Firstpriority wasaooordingly reservedforprogrammes whiohintroduoed
innovatory methodsandstruotures oftrainingsjpeoifioally designedto
easethetransition fromsohooltoworkinglifeandtomeetthespeoial -
needsofthoseunemployed youngpeoplewhoweremostvulnerable ©nthe
labourmarket *
Applications passedinfirstpriorityrepresented atotalfinanoial
commitment ofsooe43au«a«foroperations in1976,13m.u.a.for1977
and4m.u.a.for1978*
Secondpriority wasgiventothoseprogrammes whiohwereprimarily designed
toinfluenoe thovolumeratherthantheoontentoftraining,andwhioh
wcrojustified basioally intermsofanti-oyolioal activities *Intothis
category camethevariousschemestoexpandtrainingoapaotty whetherin
publioorprivateoentresorinorwthe-Job traininginemployer'spremioes *
Inthelattercaseassuranoes wererequiredthatsuchsohemeswouldnot
simplyprovidesubsidies forongoingtraining andreoruitnent andthat
thequalityandoontentofpuohtraining sohemeswouldnotbesubordinated
tootherobjectives suohasaaximislagthenuaberofyoungpeopleinvolvod *

19
Duetobudgetary constraints ,itwaspossibletoapproveforassistance
onlythosesecondpriorityapplications whichrepresented norv-governmental
programmes indangerofnotbeingcarriedoutiftherewasnofirm
financial commitment bytheFundorwhichvrerelocatedintheE.R.D.F.
regions.Thetotalfinancial commitment fortheseapplications wasabout
18m.u.a.foroperations in1976,2m.u.a.for1977and2m.u.a.for
1978.

THE HANDICAPPED
volume ofapplications
42mInterventions aiding theintegration ofthehandioapped into aworking
environment areauthorised both under Artiole 4and 5ofCouncil Decision
74/328EECandaredealt with together inthis seotion oftheReport *
During 1976 ,applications eligible forassistance exoeeded the
aggregate budgetary allooation more than three times .(l)
Rigorous seleotion criteria were therefore neoeso&xy *
General characteristics ofapplications
43. thepromoters
Themajority ofapplications oame from thepublio authorities in
theMember States responsible fortheintegration ofthehandioapped
into employment ;th«projects were ,consequent ly,large-scale pro­
grammes aimed atimproving nationally orregionally theBocio -
profeseional situation ofthehandioapped oovering ,forexample ,
thetraining ofpersons responsible fortheplaoement ofre-trained
handicapped people insuitable employment *
44• Programmes submitted byprivate promoters ,though obviously notof
thesize ofthose ofthepublio authorities were also valuable ,
playing avery important role intherehabilitation ofthehandioapped «
>.*
Itistobeobserved ,moreover ",that despite thegenerally restrioted
financial resources theprivate centres have notbeen slow in
undertaking complex projeots ofademonstrative type inasuccessful
manner .
(1)Art•4andArt.5ofCouncil Seolsioa Hfi6/EEQ .

21
Objectives
45.Theapplications fellintothreebroadcategories corresponding tothe
typesofactionseligibleforFundassistance :
Article4ofCouncilDecision 71/66/EEC
(a)short-term demonstrative projects aimedatimproving thequality
ofvocational rehabilitation facilities tothehandicapped ;
Programmes ofthiskind,whichbecauseoftheirmultiplier effect,
oanpotentially improvethegeneralmethodsofthereintegration
ofthehandicapped intheshort-term ,weresubmitted fromGermany,
Belgium,Italy,Luxembourg andtheUnitedKingdom.Theyconcerned ,
forexample,improvedtraining programmes involving theuseof
computers andaudio-visual techniques andpractical meansofaiding
thesocialandprofessional integration ofpersonssuffering from
braininjuries,
(b)training andadvancedtrainingcoursesforpersonsemployedinthe
medicalrehabilitation ,vocational guidance ,training ,vocational
training orrehabilitation andre-employment ofhandicapped persons
aswellasforthoseresponsible forthetraining ofinstructors .
programmes ofthiskindweresubmitted fromBelgium,Prance,Ireland
andtheUnitedKingdom.
Article 5ofCouncilDecision 71/66/EEC
(o.)Programmes fortheintegration ofthehandicapped intoemployment .
Thisratherbroadprovision opensupconsiderable opportunities for
applications whichweresubmitted inlargenumbersbyoperators in
alltheMemberStates.
A

t?.
Guidelines usedfortheselection ofapplications
46.Theguidelines usedfortheselection ofapplications remainedsubstantially
unchanged in1976ascomparedwiththepreviousyearasfollows–
–Article4CouncilDecision 71/66/SEC
short-term demonstration projects weregivenfirstpriorityprovided
they
–wereclearlydefinedastoscope,lengthandobjectives andconcerned
newmethodsinaccordance withtheinitial Community actionprogramme
forthevocational rehabilitation ofhandicapped persons(l);and
–formedpartofanoverallandcontinuous processofproviding optimum
&conditions forthesocial,medicalandvocational rehabilitation of
thehandicapped asenvisagedintheCouncilDecision.(2)
Wherehowever,aMemberStatesubmitted morethanoneapplication ofthis
type,onlyonewasaccordedfirstpriority ,theremainder beingconsidered
forsecondpriority .
Alsograntedfirstpriority weretraining ooursesinregionswherefacilities
forhandicapped training wererelatively underdeveloped compared withthe
restoftheCommunity .
Measures approvedinfirstpriority amountedtoabout-17m.u.a.for
operations in1^76,1.4'm«u.a .for1977and1.1m.u.a.for1978.
47*Secondpriority wasgrantedtoothertraining ooursesexceptcrashcourses
ofunder100hoursandpermanent training courses.Inpractioe ,however ,
thebudgetary situation enabledonlyaninsignificant numberofapplications
inthiscategorytobeaooepted.
./•
(1)CouncilResolution of27June1974–0JC80of9July1974
(2)CouncilDecision 74A28/EBCof27June1974-0JL185of9July1974

23
Article 5CouncilDecision 71/66/EEG
48.Thegeneralschemesdescribed abovewereacoordedfirstpriority
iftheyformedpartofanoverallandcontinuous prooessofre-
adaptation fortheseriously disabledinspecialised centresvdth
theobjective oftheirreintegration inopenemployment .
49•budgetary situation ,however,madeitimpossible tofinanceall
applications meetingtheforegoing criteria andtheCommission was
obligedtorestrict thechoicetotheapplications ofgreatest
importance withinthiscategory,talcingdueaccountoftheneedsof
regionswhereexistingstructures areinadequate .
Bencficiarie3
50.Applications approvedin197°areestimated todirectlybenefit some
3,500personsindemonstration projects and4»000intraining projeots
-bothofwhichcategories haveamultiplier effect–andtocontribute
directlytowardsthere-integration ofsome25,000disabledpersons
intoworkinglife.

d4#
KtXJÏONâ
vo?;.r .«¿f t.t;,/licatlcnia
cause ofthe eoouctaio bituation midooneequent siowaown latheoreatien of
1.5tf jobs iiitheregions ,there wasnogreat change during 1976i^
•thenumber ofnewapplicati onereceived under this heading .
Thenumber ofoperations dealt with in1976 wasappreciably greater thtin 1973
Lecau &eofthe teignifioaat amount ofcommitment oredits carried forward fropi
1974 aiid 1975 .
B&bpite the p.cueiit difficulties iafinding employment fortrainees atthe ci\\
ocai-eea ,thevolume oftraining wasincreased oocapared toprevious years ,by
theuae oftraining inoertain oases asameasure tocombat unetnplo^ubnt audV
theoarrying outofareasonable volums ofstook training *
TkzI976 L,jj^ota.y provibiou reauined atroughly thebaae leval asthepi*vious
yea:' -inreal tonus –229 fl»*u»a «ascompared vith 206»
General character !bti68ofapplications
Dosing 1976 ,perhaps even more than inprevious years ,there were indicatives of
growing co-operation between authorities responsible forregional develops witana .
the Coiaiui ssion intherealisation oftraining programmes essential fortheir
workers andneoeattary forthedevelopment ofsound employment policies .Hie
role oftheSocial Fund proved somewhat more significant than heretofore ;
thera wasanoticeable increase inthenumber ofprogrammes drawn upvith «view
toaid fruB the Fund wldoh could not have been carried out were itnot for
ruch aid*This development ,moreover ,supported moves towards diveraiiMoati wiia
theregions tosou&tes^acttheeffewi &fbltuativnu *©fdeeliufe in ftotiviti **
crovei^-depeudonoe onasi^gls industry .

Thequalityoftheapplications showeddefinite improvement andpointed
totheexistence ofpositivepolioiesofemployment Inseveralregions *
Manyoftheprogrammes submitted Involved trainingidentifying future
employment patternsorleadingtojobsinnewgrowthareas.These
applications frequentlycontained imaginative experimental aspectsof
importance inthedevelopment ofemployment polioywhichledto
exchanges ofexperience betweenpromoters andprovidedastimulusfor
theidentification ofnewemployment proppeots andtheIntroduction of
newtraining methods *
The1976applications ,moreoverfevidenced onoeagaintheimportant
roleplayedbysmallandmediumsiBedenterprises inthecreation and
safeguarding ofemployment •
rI .
ThePrometers
Agrowingtendency wasshownin197°towardsthegroupingofprogrammes
*
byoperators dealingwithspecifiotrainingprojeots whichwereusually
ofaninnovatory character.Thisgrouping waseffectedinsuohaway
astoreducewastethroughduplieation ordispersal ofeffortwhile
tendingtowardsgreatorovert-allco-ordination oftraining sohemesand
facilitating themanagement oftheSocialFund*
Theregionalisation ofvocational traininginPranceledtothesubmission
ofapplications bytheregionalauthorities *The'numberofprivate
promoters showedamarkedincreaseintheUnitedKingdom,especially la
η
Λ
BorthernIreland *ZnItaly,ontheotherhand,privatepromoters
continuedtobefewduetolaokofsupportfrompublicflnanoewhile
ontheotherhand,beoauseoftheeoonomiosituation,aotlvitybythe
publicauthorities showedlittlelnorease;buttrainingbodieslinked

26.
topublio enterprises oontinued toplay AniKportaat role .
Objectives
During 1976 »thepolicy oftheCommission inmanaging theSocial Fund
wastostimulate andencourage newinitiatives atregional andlocal
level while maintaining assistance totraining organisations operating
nationally .
Member States *applioations correspondingly fell into twobroad categories
reflecting ,respeotlvety ,national training polioies intheoontext of
theoverall labour market andtheBare speoifio complementary regional
needs * TheMember States tended tosupport this complementary training
coinciding with theCommission 'spolicy ofincreasing concentration
ofFund intervention onthese regional programmes .Thus ,the
Commission decided togive particular eophasis toprogrammes emanating
froQ theregions ofabsolute priority asdefined inparagraph 61below .
TheIrish andItalian regional programmes eame within this category .Aa
intheprevious year ,many Italian projeots hadtobeadjusted after
approval because offinanoial difficulties du«toth,eeconomic 'situation .
Adult training programmes inGreenland andtheFrenoh overseas departmentsQ
were maintained andcontinued toplay animportant role ;inCreenland in
1976 ,2000 persons were trained with theaidoftheSooial Fund outofa
total population of50,000 .
Many programmes intheother regions ,partly under theinfluenoe of
theseleotion criteria forFund aidforthese zones ,contained
innovatory features aoregards training methods orskills imparted ,
were geared towards alleviating speoifio employment problems andincluded
guarantees ofjobs ontheoonolusion oftraining .
(1)Guadeloupe ,Majrtiniqus ,Ch^rane ,-Bsonion .

27.
60.Eligibility isconfinedtoprogrammes carriedoutintheregionsand
areaswhiohmaybenefitfromtheEuropeanRegional Development Fund
(underthetermsofArticle3ofCounoilRegulation (EEC)HO724/75
establishing thatFund)(l)Because,however,ofbudgetarylimitations
andtheconsiderable variations betweentheseregions *levelsofemploy­
mentimbalance ,priorities hadtobeestablished withintheRegional
Fundregions.Infactthreelevelsofpriority wereset-'absolute 1,
•first*and'second-inthelightofsuchindicators asunemployment
ratesintheprevious fouryears,GDPperheadoomparedtothenational
average,activityrates,levelsofemigration anddependence on
agricultural employment .
61.Accordingly ,theabsolutepriority category wasdetermined ascomprising
theItalianMezzogiorno ,Ireland,NorthernIreland,theFrenchoverseas
departments andGreenland .Asatisfactory distinction betweenthefirst
andsecondprioritycategories waslesseasytodrawonthebasisofthe
indicators ,especially inviewoftherapidupwardmovement ofoneof
them,unemployment rates;thisledtosomeregionswithundoubted long-term
structural problems (Qualifying onlyassecondpriority.Mainlybeoause
ofthisdifficulty ,theCommission hasdecidedinitsguidelines forthe
1977management oftheSooialFund(fi)to adoptonlytwoprioritylevels;.
theabsolutepriorityregions,andtheremaining Regional Fundregions.
62.Theapplication ofthe1976guidelines resultedintheapprovalofallthe
applications fromtheabsolutepriorityregions.
./•
(1)OJNoL73of21Itarch1975,p2
(2)OJNoC141of15June1977,PP6-7

28
63»Budget restrictions meant that oftheremaining applications ,those
insecond priority hadtoberefused andthose infirst priority could
bemet only partially ,employing asystem oflinear reduotion .Onthe
basis oftheproportion oftotal eligible first priority olaims to
available credits ,areduction wascalculated ineach Member State 's
total claims which was spread over theapplications concerned inthe
last group tobeprooessed attheendoftheyear .
This linear reduction wasapplied only tonational programmes for
which financing wasinanycase assured .
64•Applications passed inabsolute priority andfirst priority
amounted tonearly 230m.u.a.foroperations in1976 ,138m.u.a.for
1977 nearly 36m.u.a.for1978 .
Ofthis ,approximately 5wasforprogrammes infirst priority and44%
forabsolute priority .
Beneficiaries
65.Itisestimated that about 230,000 persons benefitted from programmes
approved under this heading intheyear 1976 ,ofwhom approximately
100,000 were situated intheabsolute priority regions .
•/•

TECHNICAL PROGRESS29
Volumeofapp11oat1ona
Therewasasubstantial increaseinapplications fornasiatencetoop«»jatio.i
rtain»edatfacilitating adaptation totherequirements oftechnical progress
ofthosebranches ofeooncmioactivityinwhichsruehprogr»«s givesrise
substantial changedinmanpower endprofessional knowledge andsHlXe(l)'
Nevertheless *,andnotwithstanding adoubling ofthebudgetary provision
to10m.u.a.aacomparedwith5nuu.a#inthepreviousy«r.rtthis
tonow,arelatively minorfield ,ofintervention .
General__characteriatlosofappllcstl one
Applications underthisheadingwerefrequently oonneated withteohnoglflfl .
advanoere<juiring newskillsingrowthsectorspuohasdeep-«<eaoilar>d
g*n(includingantipollution techniques );theexpl<H.ta1iop.of naturalr»w«
(forexamplemarioulture);and rruoloarenerpy,Biteninpcrtairtcategoryof
application encouraged IrjrtheComraission ,whiohdeveloped toaelgrdfiosajfe
extentduring197$wasconcerned withtechnological iipjovatiow r«o*«Haryt>>
safegwArd employwentintradition *!JM-patries VV« my*
Inordertoavoidnnfaircompetition spplioaHons intKIsf%+}4.**«nv%
aonsidered fromindividual flrmebutiiustbegro^wl mm*amwft
parti«mia*se<rtor*t»«tiox»}orregi«mall^vel#
Applications weresubrrftt**!fromFrar>?«fItaly«ndGemsryo
<'.
–niii>■-...■
(l)Palation(m)Vo2396/71)(Artiolel(l)(h))*

30
Guidelines used forselection ofapplications
P9«Inaddition totherequirements mentioned above concerning theavoidanoe
ofurfadr competition ,thetwoother seleotioq criteria whioh applied in
previous years were oontinued in1976 ,i.e.
–operations should contain innovatory features ,judged notonly
inrelation toteohnical aspects Vatalso bytraining oontent •
This was,moreover ,interpreted inarelative manner according to
thesize andlooation oftheindusty ;jobs ,forexample ,oould he
regarded as'innovatory *insmall andmediunsized industries even
ifthey existed already inlarge industries *
–preferenoe wasgiven toprogrammes contributing tothesolution of
themost serious employment problems particularly those confronting
small and»ediun>-sized industries *
Programmes approved inI976amounted toabout 9.5m.u.a .foroperations
in1976 ;17.4m.u.a .for1977and5.5.m.u.a .for1978 .
• . .
Beneficiarles '
. •••
•Programmes approved under this heading areestimated tobenefit about 25000
workers *

31
GROUPS OFUNDERTAKING3
likethepreoeding category andasthetitleimplies,thisfieldof
intervention oonoernsapplications relatingnottoindividual undertakings
butgroupsoffirms*Eligibleare"groupsofundertakings withsimilar ..
oroonneotedaotivities whioharet-aforoedtooease,reduoeor
transformtheiraotivities permanentlyw*(l)
Thisisanareaofintervention whichthoughpotentially important
forthefuturehasnotyetdevelopped greatlyinvolume,mainlydueto
theeffeotsofthepresenteconomiosituation onfindingfinancefor
reconversion *Onlysevenapplications werereoeivedduring1976amounting
toabout6.5m.u.a.Oneofthemwasrefusedasitoonoerned astate
4
monopoly ;threeotherswereruledoutbeoausetheyrelatedtogroupsoflegally
relatedcompanies andnotseparately-ownedfirms*Thethreeapplications
approved amountedtoatotaloommitment of626*300unitsofaooountand.
wereestimated tobenefit475persons *
(1)Régulation (EEC)Ho2396/71(Artioiel(l)(o)

II.RICIGXAL I!'.lACTCPTH3SOCIAL FVJHD
73.TheComission emphasised ,initocommunication tothoCouncilconcerning the
reviewoftheSocialFund(l)theimportanceitattachestoincreaiin# thedegree
ofconcentration ofrecourceo andtotheroleplayedbytheSocialFundin
aidingthocorrection ofstructural deficits intheless.developed regions The
regional aspectsofoperations financed underArticle4*would boaccentuated 80
thattheoverallregional impactoftheFundwouldnotfallbelowthatattainod
uptothepresent.TheCommission would(thocommunication oontinueo )verify
thoregional impactofinterventions oftheFundeaohyearinitsannualireport
ontheactivities oftheFund.
Asaconsequence oftheCommissions decision .of29March1977inthemattqr,
information necessary forthiscalculation isbeingsoughtforapplication# being
examinedin1977withaviewtoinoluding theresultsinnextyear'sannualreport#*'
relationtonotonlyregional impactasawholebutalsotheabsolutepriorityregions ,
Applications nubaitted during1976werenotroquiredtogivethiskindofinform-,
ation.Tho(forcmission'sservioes have,nevertheless ,attempt^anestimate whioty
suggeststhefollowing break-down offinancial oapmitnenta frijatheSooialFund
approvedin1976.
HTROPfAN 50CIALPJND
•74#Summarystatementofbreakdown ofinterventions approvedin1976(inm.u.i»*s)
Intrrvontion
Cector E.R.D.F. Regions RestofCommunity
Perçonslcaving
Agriculture 25 20.
Personsworkinginthe
tcxtiloandclothing
sectors € 10.
Higrantworkers 2
Youngpeople 4227
TheHandicapped 12.5 32.
Regions(Art.5) 229
TechnioalProgress/Groups
ofUndertakings
TOTAL5 15
321.5 12
Theregionaliopaotfor1976maytherefor*beestimatedinfinancial termsatnotlessthan321nu.a.or734,ofthetotalTund*
(1)CGK(77)90of29Karoh1977
(2)CouncilDeoision71/66/EBO

33
Apart from thereservations ontheaoouracy oftheforegoing estimates
duetoincomplete data ,itmust bestressed that without examining theuse
towhich theresources were putinrelation topolioies ofregional
development ,itisnotpossible toindioate theimpaot oftheSocial Fund
initsrole ofco-ordinator with Coomunity regional polioy .There are,
moreover ,thefollowing twofurther qualifications ontheuseofthe
figures t
(a)asregards migrants thevast majority oftheprogrammes areponduoted
inthehost countries inareas normally outside the&R»D*F limits .
Nevertheless ,while these aotions dofacilitate theemployment market
ofthehost countries thedireot benefioiaries arepeople whporiginate
intheregions .Regional impaot istherefore anambiguous notion in
this oontezt ;
η **
(b)intheoase ofdemonstrative projeots forthehandicapped themajority
ofaotions take plaoe innonE.R.ILF regions butanimportant objeotive
istoraise training standards generally applioable throughout the
Community *Asregards rehabilitation programmes patients often oome
from andreturn toareas other than those inwhioh the oentres are located *
.Finally ,itshould beemphasised that important astheregional impaot is,
there isnoquestion that itisbutoneoftheCommission 'spolicy objeotive *
inthecperation oftheFund )another important aimstressed forexample in
theCommunication referred toabove isthat ofoonoentrating interventions on
sectors requiring restructuring *Moreover ,theCommission isalso ooncerned in
oonoentrating onassisting themost vulnerable categories ofworker especially
young persons . '

III.PILOTEXPERIMENTS ANDPREPARATORY STUDIES
'Onemillionunitsofaocountwereallocated inthe1976budgetforpilot
schemesandpreparatory studiesdesigned bothtoguidetheCounciland
Commission intheirchoiceofareasofintervention oftheFundandtohelp
MemberStatesandpromoters ofprojects tomakethemosteffective useof
SocialFundaids.Thedegreeofinterest inthisareashowedamarked
increase overpreviousyearsandconsequently ,morerigorousselection was
required .Theselection ofprojects forfinancing tookaccountnotonlyof
theintrinsic meritsoftheapplications butthedegreeofinnovation and
theextenttowhichtheycoincided withtheaimsandpolicies oftheFund;
thetendency ,inthepresenteconomicsituation ,wastofavourpilotexperiments
ratherthanstudiesandtogiveprioritytoprojeots whichofferedthebest
prospects ofleadingtoimprovement orexpansion ofemployment inthe
relatively short-term .
78.Alistofstudiesandpilotschemesfinancedin1976appearsinAnnexVIIIofthis
report.Paragraphs 79"to98belowsummarise verybrieflythemainfeaturesof
theprojects completed ,inprogress andinitiated during1976.
Trainme :fornewTechnolo /ry
-79•Apilotschemeforthetraining oftrainers andtechnicians innewusesof
lasersinth«production -oforystalglassisbeingoarriedouttrytheCentrede
Co-operation Technique etPedagogique ,Seraing,Belgium.
TheNational Computing Centre,Manchester ,hasbegunastudyontheeffects on
employees attitudes andworkingskillsoftheintroduction ofcomputer-based
*data-processing systemsinsmallandmedium-sized companies .
Training forEmployment
BO,AstudycarriedoutbytheAssociation pourleDeveloppement delaPromotion
SooialeenBretagne (ADPSB)France,dealswiththesectoralandgeographical
imbalances inemployment duringtheseventhregional(1976-8l)plan inBrittany
andanalyses wherepossibleinterventions mightbemadethroughtraining and
socialintegration withthehelpoftheSocialFund.Itrecommends theneed
forspecialtraining programnes whicharerelatedtolooalandregional problems
adaptable inchanging employment conditions *

35
Acomprehensive studycompleted bytheInstitutpourlaPromotion pour
laFormation Permanente (IPROFOP),Prance,during197^tresultedinthe
compilation ofaCommunity handbook onaidsforadultvocational training
atnational andCommunity level.Itcontainsusefulinformation onaids
available ,conditions andrules,andanalysesresultsandexperience .
Community Training
81.MuintirnaTire,Ireland,beganthethirdstageofaprojectstartedin
1974inruralcommunity development ata'grass-roots' community level.
Thisaimsatthedevelopment ofatraining programme fortrainer-leaders
inthecontextofCommunity development throughjobimprovement andoreation
inruralareastofacilitate economio andsocialdevelopment .
Multidisciplmary Training
82.ClarksLtd.,Minehead ,UnitedKingdom,aredeveloping andcarrying outan
experiment inpolyvalent training throughautonomous workgroupaotivityin
thefootwearsectorwhichaims,apartfromimproving jobsatisfaction ,at
thebroadening ofaworker'srangeoftraditional skillsandtheacquisition
ofsupervisory skills.
8;3iWiththeintroduction ofcompletely newphotocomposition technology intothe
newspaper industry,theMirrorGroupNewspapers ,London,UnitedKingdom,are
oarrying outapilotschemetoinvestigate anddetermine optimumpolyvalent
training methodsindataprocessing forinformatio application innewspapers .
»
vocational Training
841*IstitutoperloSviluppodellaFormazioneprofessionals dellavoratori (ISPOL),
Italy,oompleted anexperimental training oourseforvooational instructors
designedtoaddtotheirexistingteaohingskillsextraqualifications enabling
themtooreateandmanagetraining programmes .

36
85*Asecondprefectentereditsfinaleta^eduring1976-thatofEnteNtzionale AGLX
per1'Istruzdone Frofesaionale (ENAIP)Italy,whiohisooncerned withthe
introduction ofsciencematerial asasubjeotintothevocational training
function intheindustrial sector.Theaimistogiveamulti-disoiplinary
training ,whichwouldimprovestudenta*employment mobility .
Unemployed KiddleKanaremor.t Training
86.ApilotschemewasbegunbyCentred'EtudesSuperieures Industrielles (CESl),
Obernai,France,totrainunemployed middle-mrnagement tomeetthenewdemands
ofundertakings .Itsaimistocombatstructural unemployment bydeveloping
training programmes forfutureproduction conditions particularly insmall
oompanies .
Development oftraining etar-cL^r^a
87.Twopilotprojectsfordivingundertaken inScotland bytheTraining Services
Agency,UnitedKingdom ,uevecompleted in1976.Thefirstwasconcerned with
air-diving atdepthsofleesthan50metres,thesecondwithtraining divers
tooperatesafelyusingmixed-gas techniques anddivingfromasubmersible
compression chamberusingbounceandsaturatiun divingtechniques atdepths
greaterthan50metres.Thesetwoprojects haveledtotheformation of
training standards ,takingintoacoountsafetyrequirements ,forthesupply
ofmanpower forthedevelopment ofoff-shore oilandgas.
Trainm# ofTruin^rs
88.TheTrainingServices Agency,UnitedKingdom,carriedoutapilotschemefor
improving thequalifications ofunemployed training offioers ;nineoftheten
coursemembershadtakenupnewemployment shortlyaftertheendoftheoourse.
89.Ente-Nazionale Indrocarburi (iiil),Italy,completed aprojectdesignedtomake
■useofknowledge andskillsoftechnicians andadultworkerswithlong
professional experience ,bytraining themasinstructors .Theprojeotdefined
themostappropriate methods,teaohing techniques andoccupational versatility
requiredtoachieverapidretraining ofadultworkersattheworkplaoe.

37
90-.TheStiftungRehabilitation ,Heidelberg ,Germany,completed anassessment study
onthedevelopment ofamioro-teachingmodelfortrainingadultvocational
traininginstructors .Thisteaching systemenablesteacherstoacquirespecific
skillsneededfortheircoursesbyimproving conventional formsofteaching .
Asafurtherpartoftheoverallresearch programme beingundertaken atthe
Heidelberg Stiftung ,apilotschemewasalsoinitiated bythesameorganisation
forthedevelopment ,testingandevaluation ofmaterials andtrainingunits
usedinsituational teaoher training .
Migrants ,
91.During197°&pilotschemewasoompleted undertheguidance ofMariaGrimbel
oftheKatholisches SozialInstitut ,KSl\Freising ,Germany,whichconsisted
ofatraining courseforsocialworkersdealingwithmigrantworkers.
Thiswasnotmerelyatheoretical course;theprojecthadaverypractical and
innovative aspectinthatthosetakingpart-whowerethemselves migrants-
receivedadditional training ,helpandadvioeattheirplaceofworkinthe
individual communities fromvisitsbyKSIrepresentatives ,whowereableto
assessindividual capabilities andgiveguidanceinactualsituations ,tonew
groupsofmigrantsarriving andseekingassistance .
Handicapped
92.During1976thesecondstageofapilotschemefortrainingteacherstotrain
handicapped adultswascompleted bytheCentredeReadaptation ,Mulhouse ,
Prance.Itconcernsthesettingupofanintej>-disoiplinary projeotgroupto
associate theseresponsible forevaluating requirements anddetermining
objectives withthoseengagedintheproduction andassessment oftraining
courses .
93.Apilotschemetotrainhandicapped persons whohavelosttheuseoftheirupper
limbs,tousetypewriters operated bylightimpulses,entereditssecondphase
atDeHoogstraat Rehabilitation Centre,Leersum.

Women 1aDeployment
S'4»The "Retravailler "Centre ,Paris ,carried outastudy ofsome 4^0cases of
women wishing toresume working careers after interruption forfamily reasons ,
identifying their sociological characteristics and theobbtucj en,including
psychological andmotivational states ,intheir way .
95.Aprojeot completed atManchester University consisted ofafollow-up study
onwomen ,following their completion ofacourse designed tofitthem for reinte –
igration into working life , baBed onthe extent towhich they obtained jobs
corresponding totheir wishes andaptitudes .Italso examined such questions
asthedegree ofsatisfaction derived from theemployment obtained ,theeffect
ofgoing baok towork onfamily relationships andtheimpact unsociety of
different attitudes onwomen returning towork .
$6,Apilot experiment conducted byCentre deRecherche etd'Etudes pour
l'Adaptabilite desCadres ,Paris ,fortheretraining ofwomen insecretarial
skills involving also socio-psychological support through self–help group
disoussions andprogrammes proved remarkably succesbful inthat 85%°fthe
participants had secured jobs within amonth oftheoonoluaion ofthepro­
gramme .
$7.Further projects atpresent being carried outbut notyet conoluded deal
respectively with thetraining ofwomen forareturn towork innewtypes of
part-time aotivi ties ,some ofwhich replaoe work formerly oarried out ona
voluntary basis ;pre-vocational training ofwomen ofrural origin for
adaptation toapriority development zone andtheproblems ofwomen in
employment inthetextile seotor .
Youth
58•Astudy wasstarted bytheTraining Services Agency ,United Kingdom ,to
investigate theseleotion andtraining practices foryoung entrants to
industry aimed atprcduoing abetter match between eohool-leavers andavailable
occupational andtrailing opportunities andidentifying obstacles tooccupational
mobility forytvL'g people and fchainitial impaot onyoung female workers ofthe

39
newlegislation regarding equality ofopportunity inemployment and
training .
Anotherstudy,initiated duringtheyearwithLaFondation Europeenne dela
Culture,Netherlands ,isoonoerned withpreparing adetailed inventory and
oritioalanalysis ofthemeasures undertaken fcytheMemberStatesinreoent
yearsinthefieldofvooational preparation *

40
IV.EFFECTIVENESS OFAID
100.TheCommission continued todevelopin1976,itsfollow-up workcmthequestion
ofevaluating theeffectiveness ofSocialFundaid.Theoriginal approachto
theproblemin1974involved thestudy,byateamofexperts ,incon­
junction withthenationaladministrations oonoerned ,offourtraining programmes
indifferent memberstateswhiohhadbeengrantedFundaid*Furtherprogramme a
weresimilarly examinedin1973findtheprincipal conclusions reportedinthe
annualreportforthatyear.
101.During1976,thequestion wasapproached fromadifferent angle;theCommission
appointed ateamofexpert8toanalysetraining programmes indifferent
memberstatesbeforethecompletion oftheprooedura forthetakingofdecisions
Ontheapplications *Theteaswereaskedtoprovideanopinion ontheteohnioal
efficiency andeconomic valueoftheprojeots presented inrelationtotheoost
oftheprojeots andaidsrequested *Theexpertswerealsoaskedtoevaluate
thetechnioal andpedagogioal valueofthetraining programme plannedorunder
way,aswellastheirprobableeffectiveness withintheframework ofanemployment
polioy.Thissurveywasstillinprogressatthaendof1976*
102.TheCommission attaohes greatimportance tothequestion ofeffectiveness of
aidandannounced initsoommunioation totheCounoilinconnection withthe
reviewoftheoperations andtasksoftheSooialFondthatitwo^ldbeinitiating a
furtherseriesofmeasureainthinoonneotiojw
103.Thus,ajssubsequently announced intheguidelines forthemanagement oftheFundfor19'
theCommission willseekannualreportsfromthenemberstatesETnthesising the
/resultsofoperations aidedtytheFund*Thesereports,summaries ofwhiohwill

41
beincluded infuture annual reports ofthePond ,areintended tofaoilitats
theevaluation ofthequality oftraining andtheresults oftheprogrammes
aided interms ofsubsequent Johplacement *Itisalso envisaged that
verifications will becarried out.inalimited number ofcarefully selected
I
oases ,bytheCommission 'sservioes with theassistance ofmembers oftheQooial
Fund Advisory Committee *Theresults ofthese verifications will also be
included infuture annual reports *

42
V.IMPROVEMHTT ITTMANAGEMENT OPFOND
104.TheCommission oonslders thatifmarlmuaeffioienqy istobeattainedin
themanagement oftheFund,anumberofbanioohangosinthepresentsystem
requiretobemade*TheseareoutlinedintheCommission'sopiniononthe
ReviewoftheRulesgoverning thetasksandoperations ofthePond*
^105.TheCommission hasfhowever,beencontinuingitseffortstoimprove
efficiency withintheexistingrules*Workbegunonthepreviousyearona
standardised application formwasdeveloped onabroaderbasisin197this
isdesignedtomakeforgreaterolarityanduniformity inthepresentation of
applioations and.consequently ,aooelorate procedures fordealingwiththem*
»•« *
106.Inpursuitofthesameobjectives ofco-ordination andeffioienoy ,experiments
werealsobegunin1976ontheuseofaoomputerintheprooessing ofapplioations *
107.Finally,mentionshouldbemadeofthevolumeofpaymentseffectedin1976which
amountedtothreetimesthatofthepreviousyear*

43
VI.SOCIAL FUEDADVISORY COMMITTEE
lOo.TheCommission ,asinpreviousyears,wasaidedinitstaskof
management oftheFund "byacloseandfruitfulco-operation vdth
theSocialFundAdvisory Committee ,a"bodysetupunderArticlo124
oftheTreatyofRomewhichismadeupofrepresentatives of
Governments ,tradeunionsandemployers .Fourplenarysessions
wereheldduringtheyear.Threeofthesewereconcerned with
applications forassistance fromtheFundandwere,ineaehcase,
immediately preceded "byameetingofitsworkingparty"examination
ofapplications ",aprocedure whichenabledthemainCommittee to
dealrapidlywithalargevolumeofapplications .
109.During1976,theCommittee gaveopinions on:
-threeseriesofapplications foraidfromtheFund;
–thedraftbudgetfortheyear1977*Onthisoccasion ,the
Committee adoptedanopinioninJuly1976 "byamajorityvote,
reoommending anincreaseinthefinancial resources ofthe
Fund.Thisopinionstatedthatdespitetheexisting "budget
austerity ,theneedstobemetbytheFundrequired agreater
increaseinbudgetary resources .Atthepreceding meeting ,
inMarch1976,theCommittee ,ontheproposalofthetrade
unionmembers,adoptedaresolution callingforincreased
resources fortheFund.
110.TheCommittee alsoconsidered ,on2December 1976,thequestionofthe
reviewoftheoperation andtasksoftheFund.
•/.

\
VII.FINANCIAL ANDBUDGETARTASPECTS44
1976BUDGET
Allocation andapportionment ofreoouroes
111.TheSocialFunddiffered fromotherFundsuptotherecentchange
inCommunity budgetary praoticeinthatitwasallocated abudgetof
creditsrelative totheyearinquestion aswellasbeingauthorised
tomakecommitments forthetwosuoceedjlng financial years.Thus,for
1976,theBudgetary Authority allocated 441m.u.a.inChapters 50,^land52of
thegeneralbudgetoftheEurppean Communities for^operations intheyear1976
whileauthorizing commitments for1977and1978of150m.u.a.and75m.u.a..
respectively ,(l)
Asoreditsfortheyear1975tadbeenusedinfulltherewerenosupplementary
resources available in1976bywayofunusedcreditsfromthepreviousyear.
Thebudgetary provision for1976showedaninoreaseof14$inrealterms
overthepreviousyear–assuming anaverageinflation rateof10^.
Thebulkoftheincreased resouroes were,inacoordanoe withpriorities in
Commission policyandthatoftheMemberStatesinoombatting youthunemploy­
ment,allocated tointerventions infavourofyoungpersona(par.32to4l)»
Apportionment ofresources
112.s^ruo'*:ure "the'budgetin1976,bydecisionoftheBudgetaryAuthority ,
differed fromthatofpreviousyears.Whereasformerly ,thebudgetwas
broken-down onlyintwobroaddivisions-interventions authorised byArtiole4
ofDeoision 71/66/eECandthoseauthorised "byArtiole5t"thenewstruoture
deoldedonbytheBudgetAuthority andusedforthefirsttimein1976,
(l)Artiole104oftheFinancialRegulations of25AprilI973
0JNo.L116of1M&v197^.r>PS

45
gives abreakdown for "thevarious fields ofintervention asshown inAnnex I.
113.TheCommission had ,astheyear progressed ,tomake some modifications tothe
original apportionment of "budgetary resouroes asbetween thevarious fields of
intervention inthe light ofapplications received anddevelopments inthe
employment situation .Theurgent need toinorease theallocation foryoung
persons inthelight oftheenormous response 'oftheMember States tothis
field ofintervention wasaoase inpoint ,theoriginal provision under this
heading being doubled to69»9 m.u.a .
Annex Ishows theinitial andfinal appropriations for1976 andthecommitment
appropriations for1977 and1978 .
Use ofResources
114 .The1976 budgetary allocation wasalmost entirely committed aswere thecommitments
authorised for1977 and1978 (seeAnnexes IIandIII)*
115.Asinprevious years however ,anumber ofprogrammes representing 48m.u.a .
inFund aidwhioh hadbeen approved were delayed oroanoelled ,because of
organisational orfinancial difficulties onthepart ofpromoters .Most ofthese
cases ,amounting to38.28 m.u.a.,were regional programmes under Article 5ot
Decision fl/66/EEGandtheresouroes thus released were reallocated almost
exclusively toreduce theextent ofthelinear reduction oafirtrt priority
applications referred toinpara .62*

46
116.Atableisalsoattached (AnnexIV)whichshowsthebreakdown of
allocations ofFundassistance byoountzyororiginofthepromoters
foreaohoftheyears1972to1976#
Payments
117Paymentsduring1976amountedto245*47m.u.a.whichisthelargestsum
everpaid.outinoneyearandrepresented anincrease ofthreetimesthe
amountpaidoutinthepreviousyear.
* PAYMENTS
Opérations
under1974 1975
i1976 Total
ι
Artide 4 19.48 26.54....... •-<)
J
1.61 I47.63
Artiole 5 86.06 105.50 6.28 197.84
TOTAL '105.54 132.04 !7.89 245.47
118.Atableisattached (AnnexV)showingthebreakdown ofpaymentseffeotedup
totheendof1976aooordingtooountiyoforiginofthepromoters .

47
119.At-theendof1976,arrearsofpaymentinrespeotof1974hadbeenreduced
toabout15m.u.a.(l)
120.Difficult legalquestions andmattersaffeoting thefinanoial regulations
areinvolvedinolearingtheoutstanding "balances andtheCommission was
inoontaotwiththeMemberStatesooncerned inthesearchforsolutions .
Someofthesedifficulties arosefromdifferences betweenoperations actually
realised oompared withprogrammes originally approved ;othersderivefrom
certainstructural differences betweenSooialFundaidsandnational aid
systems.
121..About60/bofpaymentsinrespectof1975operations werepayments on
account.Takingintoaccountthefaotthatprogrammes actuallycarried
outsometimes requirereduction ofallocations originally agreed,itseems
likelythatthenetamountofpaymentseffeotedduring1976foroperations
relatingtotheyear1975willbeoftheorderofI65m.u.a.Itshould
benotedthatthevolumeofclaimswhiohhadnotbeensubmitted bythe
Member'Statesbytheendof1976foroperations relatingto1975»came
toabout40m.u.a.
122.Allclaimsfor1976operations reoeived by31October1976,totalling
7.89m.u.a.vrerepaid.Ithadnotbeenpossibletoprocesslateapplicat­
ions,amounting to10.4m.u.a.bytheyearend.Itwillbeobserved
thatonlyaverysmallnumberofapplications relatingto1976werein
factreoeived duringtheyear.
123.Thistardiness inthesubmission ofclaimsandthefrecfuentincompleteness
ofdataaccompanying olaimsoontinuetobemajorobstaoles totheshort­
eningofthetimelagbetweenoperations andpayments.Moreover,applications
arefrequently submitted withoutclearlyirviieatingtheapportionment of
costsasbetweendifferent organisations involved.Whileolearlythere
isroomforimprovement inthesematters,asmentionedearlierinthis
Report,theCommission considers &lsothatcertainchangesarenecessary
inthepresentfinancial .rulesifthemaximumacceleration ofpayments
istobeachieved.
(l)Article1oftheFinancial Regulations of24November 1975provided
.thatinthecaseoftheSocialFund,unliketheFinancial Regulation
asawhole,thetermfortransferring resources forwhiohcommitments
hadbeenundertaken wastobeextended byanotheryeartotheendof
1976.Thuscommitments datingbaoktoI974oouldbesettledwithout
drawingfromtheappropriation forthefinancial year1976.

48
Forecast ofexpenditure
124«Thsforecasting ofSocialFundbudgetshasbeencarriedcutinasituation
whichuptonowhasshownverylittleprogressifanytowardsthereduction
ofunemployment .Moreover ,improved economictrendstowardsrecovery would
notnecessarily solveallproblems ofunemployment .Policies ofrationalisation
areprevalent inallbranches ofindustry andthedegreeofunde]>-utilisation
ofproduction indicateethat employment prospects ,evenwithreooveryin
demandandinvestment arelikelytoremainpoor.Forthisreason,oontinued
highunemployment istobefeared.
125.Thisreduction ofjoboutletsdiffersinitBimpactoncategories ofpersonin
thelabourforce,themostvulnerable beingtheyoung,whohavelittleorno
professional experience ortraining ,women,thedisabled ,migrants andelderly
workers whosequalifications haveveryoftenbecomeobsolete .Workersin
mid–careerwhoareusuallythebestintegrated inthefirmswherethey
areemployed arethosebestplacedtoadapttoproduction changes.Theimpact
onyoungpersons,andparticularly firstjob-seekers hasbeenparticularly
severeanditisgenerally recognised thatyouthunemployment islikelyto
remainaseriousproblematleastfortheperiodooveredbytheforecasts .
0
Focalpointsofintervention
126.TheCommission withthelimitedresources atitsdisposal wishesto
concentrate Fundintervention onthemostvulnerable categories ofworker,
particularly youngpersonsaswellas,inoonjunoticn withotherCommunity
instrument 8,ontheregionsmostinneedofaidbecauseoftheirlong-standing
structural weaknesses .
/•

49
ChangesinBudgetary procedures
127.Thenewbudgetary procedures whichoameintoeffecton1January1977aiarkthe
endofthesystemdescribed inpara«111.Thenewregimeenablesthe
Commission tocommitcreditsforpluriannu&l operations andthecorresponding
paymentstoheeffeoted overseveralbudgetary years,tricingaccountofthe
duration oftheprogrammes andthetimingofpaymentapplications .Italsomeans
thatasthereisnotimelimitonpaymentsinthenewsystem,theformerpractise
ofrequesting authorisation tocarryforwardunused ,commitments isHOlonger
necessary .Theamountsenteredinthabudgetforcommitments andparents asfiy
not,ofcourse,beexceeded .
BudgetForecasts 1977–1979
Commitment resources
128.Inviewofthegeneralausterity budgetary policyandtheneed "toeoricentrate
resources ontheareaswheretheyaremoetneeded,theseforwardbudgetsare
basedonmaintaining thevariousfieldsofintervention atexistinglevelsin
realtermsi.e.adjustedforrisingcosts,andproviding forgrowthonlyin
thecaseofprogrammes toassistyoungpersons.Thebudgetforecasts forthe
years1977»1978and1979arereproduced inAnnexVL.Tfcefiguresfor1977»
itshouldbenoted,areasapproved bytheBudgetary Authority fortha1977
budget,whilethosefor1978and1979areproposed bythe-Commission inits
budgetary proposals for1978.Itshouldaleobenotedthatwhilethepossibility
ofnewtypesofintervention bytheFundisenvisaged forthefuture,correespon&ir
figureshavenotbeenincludedforthemoment,thebudgetary inscription forthe
presentbeing"promemoria".

50
Theamountsconoerned arcexpressed ,inthecaseoffiguresfor197°»
inthenewEuropeanunitofaccountwhichhas"beenproposed bythe
Commission foruseinallCommunity financial instruments fromthe
beginning ofthatyear,(l)
Payment •-appropriati ons
•Ofthesumof600,6m.u.a.providedforinthe1977paymentappropria­
tions,anamountof428,6m.u.a.represents commitments fromthe1976
budgetwhichareautomatically carriedforward.
Paymentallocations foreachyearupto1979cannot "beaccurately
forecastatthisstage,particularly atatimeoftransition between
theoldandnewbudgetary systems.Inthelongerterm,theestablishment
ofmoreaccurateforecasts forpaymentcommitments willobviously depend
ontheextenttowhichitispossibletostandardise procedures for
agreeingthepayments breakdown byyearofpluriannualprogrammes .
Moreover,therevisedarrangements proposedinconnection withthereview
oftheoperation andtasksoftheFundaredesigned ,interalia,to
accelerate paymevrfcs.
\
■ •/•
(1)COM76/513"of4Ootober1976

51
\
Old Social Pund
Thefinal payments funder theoldSooial Fund ,totalling 10*044 u.a.f
were made during 1916 ,Thefollowing table set8outtotal payments in
the framework ofthe old Social Fund t
Period from 20September 1960to31December 1976 (m.u.a .)
I
Member State
iVocational
retraini ng
(Item 5301 )Resettlement
(item 5302 )Total
Chapter 53
ofthe
Budget*
t
f
Belgium 12.7 12.7 3.2
Germany 168.0 4.3 172.3 43.7
Franoe 49.0 2.5 51.5 13.1
Italy 137,4 4.7 142.1 36.0
Luxembourg
Netherlands 15.6 0.1 15-7 4.0
TOTAL 382.7 11.6 394.3 100.0
This Fund ,which wasreplaoed bythepresent Social Fund setupon
1February 1971 |wasoohtinued foratime toenable commitments undertaken
tobefulfilled and isnow defunot .

JT^r;<TI1 iv>r-^-y
n.u.a .
Art•11•HVMnMi.ln I!•!fMl■■■K
Keaàirg–-■■-i»
lOriginal Final
iAppropriations|commitment appropriat ons*
|1977 1573
I
500
cri
,^Λ
502
!
5C3
504
iI
Aidstotheagricultural
andtextile sector
Aidstoyoungpeople
Aidstohandicapped
parsons
Aidstooigrant
workers
Aidstosectors and
regionsaffected bythe
jcrisis
1.66,115 61,638
37,760 69,523
17,001 17,001
20,779 21,433
23,325 0,000
_ :I
)60,000\30,000
\ (
{ )
( (
)l (
I
I|r;;-;/nr'.T-T>corpr4-...1
i
; ,170,000 170,000 60,000 30,000
l
I
'"°
il
î
i
!
i
i
î !
|!
5
i
I
' I
!
i !
ϊ
(
cn£1 ,
j-jidstoi-provethe
employment situation in
certainre.ji.cns ,
|economic sectorsor
jgr5UV3ofcoapames
j
Treasuretohelphandi­
cappedpersonsnot
eligible toreceive
aiduijjj.erArticle 4242,071 240,212
28,929 29,738!!
)90,000 (45,000
P'T'T--TT-QC0
SocialFund–Pilot
sobesnesandprofarap-
tcryetisiii.es
Item5200PilotSchemes
aridpreparatory etudes270,000 270,000
1,00090,000 45,000
1,000
*Cc^iuitruent arpropriety onsadoptedinthe1975'financial yearfor1977amountto75o»u.a'
(of m.u«a.areunrisrChapter50,and45m«u.a»areunderChapter .51)

•i XBHCPHUrsacm.WS» gra11
Annarrofoperations adoptedfor19761ba»u«t*
feeaSalowB tyScatterStatesinAte*sectors
Îtd!I^Tsccro* IIBELGlUft IKWAM IICEWANV FFRANCE IIRELAN»IHALT LUXEMBOURG KCDERLASD3
i[UNITEDKINGDOM TOTIÏ_J
IπΓ^ΊπΓ^ΊπΓΗη^π- ζ ■υ· Ζ
IΖ
I111111I_JLJL-j |Z
5000
5001
9002Agriculture
Textiles 7
Agrle.»Testtles0,13
0,5*0,4
3,24,71
4,41Η,9
26.S13,31
0,70
0,59«,2
*,2
4,53,28
0,13
2,45I0,8
18,75,43
3,23
10,0317,2
19,4
76,80,35
2,301,1
13,84,33
5,3613,8•
32,131,54
16,67
13,07100
100
100
Total 0,67 1,1ΓΊ 9,12 14,9 1*,40 23,8 .5,869,6 18,4»30,5J 2.45 *,3 9,69 15,8 61,28 I103I
5010
5020
1030Youngpeople
Handicapped persons
RlgrantWorkersi,75
0,18
0,062,4
0,30,61
0,08 0,*7,18
11,22
3.8*10,7
66,-
17,915,32
0,71
3,5522,9
*,2
16,61,86
0,15
0,05"2,8
#.9
0,214,04
2,30
10,9921,-
13,5
51,20,03 0,20,56
1,740,8
8,125,67
2,42
1,1338,3
14,2
5,346,99
17,01
21,44100
109
100
Total
Ckjp.SO2,66 1/<0,69 0.431,34 18,8 34.18 20.5 7.924,746,02 27,6 0,03 0,1*.95 3,-38,9t 23,3164,72ICOI
5100
5101
5102Regions
Groupsofundertakings
Technical progress4,21M 5.62
0.362,5.
28.310.65
0.31*,4
3,334,28
2,0315,0
21,419,22
0,01
0,028,4
0,8
0,291,as
0,62
J4,9240,-
48,8
51.83,14
1,471,4
15,560,27
0,28
0,7426,3
22.1
7,3229,24
1,27
9,49100
ICO
100
Tot*l 4,21 1.8 5,98 10,96 4,636,31 15,1 19,2597,39 40,6 4,61 I1,961,29 25,5 ?*0,-I1C0i
5110 [Handicappedpersons I0,98I3-3I3,77 .12'72,10 7.1 6.62I22,24.0013.43H 10,2|'0,04I0,1I3,03I10,26,19|20,8 29,78LoJ
Total
Chap.51 5,19 1.9 9,74Z]13,06 4,942,93 15,9 23,25 8,61
100,44 i37,2 0,04 0,1 7,64 2,867,48 25,-269,77j100I
Total
Chap.
50^517,85 1,810,43 2,444,42 10,2 77,11 17,6I
i
i31,17 7,1146,46 33,6!
i
0,07 ; 12,592,9|106,39 24,4436,49 100

-54- MÏÏEK .III
Summary ofauthorl tations forcommitments inthe1976 financial year i
formulti-annual operations inm.u.a . i
ArticleAuthorisation of
commitment 1976 for 1977Authorisation of
commitment 1976 for 1978
■■ » 1 ir
500
Agriculture
♦
TextilesItem 5000 17,16
Item 5001 4,91
Item 5002 0,94Item 5000 6,52
Item 5001 3,16
Item 5002 0,62
Total 23,01
iTotal 10,30
501
Young PeopleTotal 15,36 Total 5,94
502
Handicapped
Persons Total 1,36 Total 1,12
503
Migrant Workers
jTotal - 14,06 Total 12,03
Total |
Chapter 50 53,79
Item 5100 79,01
Item 5101 0,14
Item 5102 7,4429,39
Item 5100 35,82
Item 5101 0,08
Item 5102 5,47510
Regions
Groups ofundertakings
Technical Progress
Total 86,59 Total 41,37
511
Handicapped Persons' " I
Total 1,75 Total 2,29
Total
Chapter 511,1 ■·' 1–■ 1Τ
89,34 43,66
' U
Total
Chapters 50+51 143,13 73,05
tSCSSMS8SSBt8tSSS8l88S888aS8SBai888S8S88aS8e5SS ;8SCSCSSSSS8S38aaSS883SSaSB8B8aSSS8ISS88Si

.ν.
-55-
ANNEXIV
BREAKDOWN OFAIDFROMTHESOCIAL FUNDPERCOUNTRY OFORIGIN OFTHEPROMOTERS
COMMITMENTS
'Member StateAmountinmillion u.a.'? X
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976
IBELGIUM1,74 7,20 6,54 8,02 7,85 6,2 3,9 2,6 2,2 1,3
IDENMARK5,0511,97 8,9410,43 2,8 4,7 2,4 2,4
GERMANY 10,12 19,94 27,93 .41,73 44,42 36,3 10,9 10,9 11,2 10,2
IFRANCE 8,32 32,19 49,95 73,83 76,60 29,8 17,7 19,6 19,8 17,5
IRELAND 9,7916,87 22,57 31,67 5,4 6,6 6,1 7,2
ITALY !5,77 43,70 72,33 95,53146,46
».20,7 24,0 28,4 25,7 33,5
LUXEMBOURG 0,02 0,04 0,01 0,03 0,07 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1
NETHERLANDS 1,92 6,77 6,71 10,94 12,58 6,93,7 2,6 2,9 2,9
UNITED KINGDOM 57,40«
62,27 110,24 106,39 31,5 .24,5 29,6 24,4
TOTAL 27,89 182,08 254,58 371,83 436,47 100,0 100,0 100,0 .100,0 100,0.
Note:Itshouldbenotedthattheabovefiguresareexpressed inbudgetary unitsofaccountwhichdonotreflect
present-day currency values.

-56-AHÏÏ3XV"
I
PAYMENTS FROMEUROPE-AIT SOCIALKJ1ID
inyears1972-I976
..aocordingtocountryoforiginofpromoters andyearof
realisation ofoperations
(inmillionunitsofaccount)
I
t .Country1972 1973 1974 1975
ι1976 Total
Belgium 4,00 4,50 4,83 13,33
IDenmark4,65 11,73 8.2624,64
IGermany 16,16 23,43 31,47 71,06
IFrance 26.60 32.19 10.01 68,80
iIreland8,68 !
I12,64 10,96 32,28
JItaly 32,48 59,22 42,97 134,68
{Luxembourg0,005 0,005 0,01
INetherlands5,96 5,32 7,61 18.89
IUnitedKingdcc 52,95 57,16 41,20 I151,31
Total
1973-1976 151,49 206,20 157,31 515,00
Breakdown not
available far
1972 24,221
1,23 7,89 33,34
GeneralTotal24,22 151,49 206,20 158,54 7,89 548,34
■°^e-!Itshouldbenotedthattheabovefiguresareexpressedinbudgetaryunitsofaccountwhichdonotreflect present –day currency values .

-57-ANÎTEX VX
BUDGETJFOR1977andDRAgTBUDGETS FOR1978AUD1979
COMtølTMESTT CREDITS
ARTICLES,1977 1978 i 1979
1m«Uta.m.e.u.a* m.u.a.m.e.u.a * .m.u.a.m.e.u.a.*I
'500
5000Agriculture
5001Textiles
5002Mixedi53<(43) 43 35I54I44
I501Youngpersons 172/(Î4P) 220 179 275 224
1502Handicapped 23 (19) 601
I:49 75 61
!503Migrants . 25 I(20) 20!-w-- 25 20
I504Anti-crisia /p.m»/p.m. p.m.
._Lp.m. p.m. p.m.I
TOTALCHAPTER50 273 (222) 343 279111
429 349
510
5100Regions
5101Groupsof
Enterprises
.5102Technical
Progress .|310'(253)1344I28I I382
)
I511Handicapped I33 (27) p*DUip.m. p»nu P«m«
TOTALCHAPTER 51 343-(280) 344 281 382 312
ITOTALCHAPTERS50+51J616 (502) 687 560 811 661
SeeCommission'sproposaltotheCouncil(CCM76/513of4October1976)aboutintroduction ofnewEuropeanUni"
ofAcoountfrom1January1978,attherate1u.a.*0.815e.u.a.inrespectofSocialChaptersofBudget.

650
600
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
όE0R0PEA1T SOCIAL FOND
(CouncilDecisionll/66/EEDof1February1971)
TRMDS HTBUDGETAHT ALLOCATIONS
Unittmilliontua*AMEXVH
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977
i 7
I_. I
. i
55*51 1
ϊ
é
i£222,2. MÛ >Μ*»ο
ij
ι
IΛαΤ.ο-
<|ρKey:
Unittmillion "u.a.
SocialFondBudget
(Totalforoperations
underArt*4+5of
Decisionof1Feb.1971)
SocialFondBudget
(Operations underArt.4
ofDeoision of1Fel>.1971
SocialFondBudget
(Operations underArt.5
ofDeoisionof1FeT>.1971
Ilote:1977figure,unlikepreviousyears,includesforwardcommitments
(Seepara.Ill)

-59-
LISTOFPREPARATORY STUDIES ANDPILOTSCHEMES ASSISTED PROM1976HJDGBT
EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUM)
Article 7ΑΝΪΓΕΧντη
Youth
84/76ET
86/?6ET
73/76EPYoungPeopleattitudes
Vocational preparation intheEuropean
Community
Trainingofyoungworkersforintegration
intoaotiveworkTraining Services Agency
London UK
Fondation Européenne de
laCultureAmsterdam,Holland
LaSouche,Monthléry
Franceinu.a.
15,774
'30,000
59,451
Wotnen
70/76EP
76/76EP
81/76EP
83/76EPExamination oftheproblemofwomenin
management (textileseotor)
Trainingforthere-integration ofwomen
Training ofwomenforareturntoworkina
newtypeofpart-time aotivity
Information campaign andpre-vocational training
ofwomenofruralorigininapriority development
doneCottonTraining Board,
Manchester UK
C«RtS«A«C »
Paris,France
IEFA,
Meta,Franoe
C«Ë»S«'de Boisrohert de
Hérouville ,Calvados,France10,380
20,970
5*8,050
"67,005
Handloapped
50/76EP
65Α5ΕΡTraininghandicapped personsintheuseoftype­
writersoperated hylightpulses
Trainingoftrainersforhandicapped adults,•
ET=Preparatory Study/EP=Pilot SchemeDeHoogstraat Rehabilitation
Leergum,Netherlands
«
CentredeRéadaptation de
Mulhouse France38,392
61,046

Trainin# of
Urainara
74/76EP Trainingoftrainers
72/76 Integrated pedagogictrainingfor
trainare
Tralninp 1of
Social W..:rl<ers
69/76EP Trainingofsocialworkers
Tîn^ploy edm-jc'le
Ma^ageniout <■
88/76S3 TrainingofTmeEployed managers
TK-r^elorientof
Trainiii^r Sxand
75/l&2s Creationandvalidation ofatrainingstandardrelatedtonixedgases(deep)diving
Kultlrlieciolirinry
Traimns
78/76IP Polyvalent trainingforautonomous workgroups
inthesfioeindustry
80/76EP Polyvalent trainingfor«,neutilisation of
infomatic technique ;intheuon'^pauer industry
35/76EP Multidiseiplinaxy traininginthemeatindustry
inBrittanyENIRome,ïtalylinu.a»
40,000
StiftungRehabilitation 112,9->4
Heidel'yerg ,ueriaar<y
IRES3
EmiliaF-utagriOlo ,Italy ^435
CESI 10,000
Obernai France
TralningServicesA^ency 120,000
London UK
Clark8Ltd., \30,C'X)
Mine'head,Somerset UK
MirrorGroupNews-papers 30,000
London UK
Association pourleDévelopoement '?1*1^
delaPromotion SocialeenBretagne
(ADPSB}Rennes

3»
VooaSq.onal Training
38A6EP Introduction ofsciencematerial intothevocational
training functionintheindustrial sectorEnteRazionale ACLIperl'Istruzione Profes­
sionale(ENAIP)Roseinu.a.
48,727
62/76ET Aidforvocational trainingintheEuropean Community IPROFOPParis 10.285
Community Training
27MW ThirdstageoftheCommunity Development Trainingin
theregionsMuintirnaTire,Dublin
Ireland 120,000
Training fornew
Teohnology
64/76EP
79A6ETTrainingofworkersinnewusesoflasersascuttingtools
Effeotofintroducing oomputerbaseddataprocessing
systemsonemployeeattitudes andworkingskillsin
smallandmedium-sized companies(CE.CO*TE.PE) 57,883
ÇentredeCoopération Technique
exPédagogique
(Seraing)Belgique
Rational Computing CentreLtd*,
Manchester UK
22,920
yEuropeanSno-tplvPund
85A6ETSettingupofmaohinerytomeasuretheeffioienoy of
occupational training schemessubmitted bythe
SocialFundIndependent Experts 30,000

AHÎTEXIX
LTSTCPAPPLICATION Tî1976
kategori
Kategorie
Category
Categorie
Categoria
CategorieÀnsvarlig aynaigned
Prager
Responsible bodies
Organismes responsablea
Organismi responsabili
Verantwoordelijke instellingGennemffrelses-Antalper-f
periode aoner j
Eurchfuhrung«-1Anzahl Ar-
zeitrauo beitnehmer
Implement ationNumberof
period vorKers
Période de involved j
rialisation Effectifs ]
Periodo di concernés j
realizzazione NumerodiI
Tijdvak van effettivi
uitvoeringAajatal be-
I
1trokken
personen
* 5Kommissionena tllekua
Zuschuss vonderKoinrr.issiongenehmigt
Assistance oftheCommission
Concours agrééparlaCommission
Contributo concesso dallaCommissione
DoordeComnissie toegekende bijstacd
i/in/en
3Q7Sr.-e./RE/u.a./u.c.
1Q77 1973

-1-
II I 1 6
1 3
* : ...5
19761977 I1978
-Β Article 4
ΛE
β;
•ιAgriculture
/LandbouwOfficeNational del'Emploi
Rijksdienst voorArbeid
O.N.E.H./R.V.A. ./200 127.000 140.000
«
U
£
/.Textile/
Textiel-
industrieOfficeNational del'Emploi
Rijksdienst voorArbeid
O.N.E.H./R.V.A.1.500 543.000 603.000
E-
L
6Migrants/
Nigrerende
werknemersAdministration Communale de
SaintJossetenHoode' 80•_. I
2.267■ I
2.060L
I
EHandicapés/
Gehandicap -
tenPrévoyance Sociale
SocialeVoorzorg 700
i216.000 236.000 260.000
Handicapés /
Gehandicap-
ten
Migrants/
Migrerende
werknemersCentrede,Cardiologie du
Travail,Hôpital,St.Pierre
Stadsbestuur vanGent
/1.4.1976-31.6.1979
1.10.1976-31.6.19771équipe
pour300
handicapés
16524.390
15.82837.060
31.65641.620
Migrants/
Nigrerende
werknemersAssociation pédagogique d'accueil
auxjeunesimmigrés,SaintJosse
tenMoodef2.fT.1976-30.o.Tvri 20 1.628 4.095
Migrants/
Migrerende
werknemersConseilConsultatif desImmigrés
delaVilledeCharleroi Entr'aidc
auxImmigrés delaVillede
Charleroi15.9.1976-31 .12.*78 152 9.011 29.138 32.232

-2-
1 2 3% 51~ 6
1976197?!1978
Jeunes/O.N.E.M./R.V.A. 1.1.76-31.12.76 2.000 1.303.6C0
Jongeren
Jeunes/O.N.E.H./R.V.A. 1.1.76-1.3.77 1.250 450.000 40.000
Jongeren
2
/
ê

-3-
1J__L_5 h 56
1976 1977 1978
Β[Handicapés;jFondsNationaldereclassementdes
εIGehandi-Itravailleurs handicapés (FNRSH)1.1.76-31.12.76 1.027 980.143
L|capten IRijksfonds voorsocialereclas-
G
t|seringvanreclassering
QIRégions/IOfficeNationdel'Emploi *
UIGebieden IRijksdienst .voorArbeit 1.1.76-31.12.76 SOO 260.700
•€1 1\O.K.C.K./R.V.A.) 1/
ΒIRégions/IOfficeNational del'Emploi •
EIGebieden ï1.1.76-31.12.76 5.800 3.165.400 30.400
L I(O.N.E.M./R.V.A.)
6
*iIRégions/FOfficeNational del'Emploi
EGebieden
(O.N.E.M*/R.V.A.)1.1.76-31.12.77
3
> . I380 172.900 15.200
I
• ..I
\*
I*.
••

1 2 3k 56
1976 197? 1978
S' :Artikel 5
AIOrarlder IMinisteriet forGrønland 1.1.76-28 .2.77 230C 1.731,013 15.667
M ErhverTS -ISoeialainisteriet 1.1.76-31.12.76 2*»31 3.766,667
hccraede
n
Onrlder Direktoratet forArbejdsa&rkeds -1.1.76-1.6.77 7000 3.*13,333 93,333r
Auddannelserne *
SOmråder Undervisningsministeriet 20.8.76-31.12.76 260 190.000
ΚOarader Ministeriet forGrønland
« *1.9.76-31.12.76
φ378 203,000».
φ
/
*• •

5
0
A
»
M
A
B.
KUng*
Unge
Dnge
Ung«
Ung*
rt ■■»
l&rbejdtr *Artikel h
Arbejdsministeriet
Undervisningsainisteriet
Undervisningsministeriet
Arbejdsministeriet
Undervisningsministeriet1.1.76-31.7.77
1.10.76-31.7.77
1.10.76-31.12.78
1.10.76-30.6.77
1.1.76-31#7.76
1^8^76»31.-12^76320
130
70
800
2101976
2>»0,000
35.333
33,333
220,000
80,000
«iftCin
• *11977
35,333
73,333
300.0001978
37,333

1 2 3
D1Artikel 4
EIWanderar- beitnehmerIInternationaler BundfürSozial- arbeit1.1.76-
U
TUanderar-
beitnefuaerDiakonisches WerkderEvangelischen
KircheinDeutschland12.4.76
!
iLLandwirt-tfhaft.
r iBundesanstalt fürArbeit
r1.1.76-
f-C
H
lBehinderte
Behindert
Textilin­
dustrieBundesrainisteriun fürArbeitund
Sozialordnung j
Bundesminist -f.ArbeitundSoziald
Bundesanstalt fürArbeit I1.1.76-
.1.1.76-
1.,1.?j-
Behinderte Bundesain ;fürArbeitundSozial«1.1.76-
Ν
Behindert «Bundesmin.fürArbeitundSoz»
Wanderar-
beitnehœeiBayerisches Staatsminister iurafür
ArbeitundSozialordnung1.1.76-
Wanderôr-
beitnehmeMinisterium fürArbeit,Gesundheit
u.Sozialordnung -Baden-Württemberg1.1.76-
Uanderar-j
beitnehmeiOerHessische Sozialminister .Hesseη1.1.76-
f
Wanderar-
beitnehmeRheinland-Pfalz ,Ministerium für
Soziales,Gesundheit undSport
ι1.1.76"
Wanderar-j
beltnehnei
II·
DerMinister fürArbeit,Gesundheit
•u.Soziales desLandesNordrhein-
Westfalen1.1.76-
Uanderar-OerNiedersächsische Sozialministei
Hannover1.1.76-
9δ-
1976 19?? 19?»
31.12.76
-31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.767.557
25
2.400
500
1.370
J
5.000
.35.000
111.860
203.170
54,500
30.000
300.750
35.000299,044
50,996
4.705.601,
16,003
2.695.214
1.747,188
8.511,885
253,757
245,049
196,448
54.098
716,660
47,814

1
D
E
U
T
S
C
H
l
Ν
0Wanderar-
beitnehmer
Landwirt­
schaft
Textilin­
dustrie
Textilin-dustrie
JugendlicF :
Jugendliche
Jugendllche
Jugendliche
Jugendlich
Jugendlich
Behinderte
Uanderar-
beitnehmer
warrotrar ■
beitnehmer
W»nderar-
beitnehraerOerSenatorfürArbeitundSoziales
Berlin
Bundesanstalt fürArbeit
Bundesanst»lt fürArbeit
Bundesanstalt fürArbeit
Bundesanstalt fürArbeit
Bundesanstalt fürArbelt
Bundesanstalt fürArbeit
Bundesminister fürBildungu.
Wissenschaft
SenatorfürArbeitu.Sozialesin
Berlin
Bundesanstalt fürArbeit
Bundesministerium fürArbeitu.
Sozialordnung
Bayerisches St3atsninist»riu »für
Arbeitu.Sozialordnung
=5®inisterium fürArbeitundSozial-
hmerOrdnung,Baden-Uürrtemberg
ar-SenatorfürSchulwesen,Berlin
Wanderar-
beitnehraeiiSenatorfürFamilie,Jugendund
Sport.Berlin1.1.76-31.12.76
1.1.77-31.12.77
1.1.76-31.12.76
4.1.76-31.12.76
1.1.76-31.8.76
1.9.76-31.8.77
1.9.76-31.8.77
15.8.76-31.12.7fi
20.11.76-31.12.76
1.1.76-31.;8,76
1.1.76-31.12.76
1.1.76-'31.12.7&
1.1.76-31.12.76
1.1.76-31.12.76
1.1.76-31.12.76115.800
1.510
418
1.682
5.600
9.480
.25.4
1.480
2.000
906
?
7-74C
13.146
588
20d1976
249,399
2.442,371
541,945
ζ'.τΣΤ,ΐνϊ
2.734,973
2.473,088
25,145
1.536,885
94,87î
313,379
2.695,214
168,538
4
173,497
76,694
14,5081977
168.538
18,9621978
4.946,175
50,290
2.732,240
1.043,6482.732,2*0
169.904

··β·
1C :r– 'Mi 1:irmII IIiIII'J! 111J 1- '• '*4i'.,
«
1t *"1976 1977 1978
»
C
ul!tnder»r
beitnehaerNiedersichsischer Kultusaimster 1.1.76-31.12.76 6030 132,719
■«.
Τ
S
C
ΗWanderar-
beitnehaerMinisterfürArbeit,Gesundheit u.
SozialesdesLandesNordrhein-Uest -
falen1.1.76-31.12.76
/'14122 1.124,518
L
A
IL
■»tlanderar-
beitnehner
Wanderar -
beitnehaerHinisterfürFamilie,Gesundheit u.
Sozialordnung ,Saarland
Arbeiteruohlfahrt ,Bundesverband
•.V.
–•'**
... .*
«••.•1.1.76•31.12.76
é
1.11.76-31.3.77900
2017,350
2,963.
J
m6,390
•-
2

-9-
i ;–: i : 6
1 3 I« 5 I
_J1976 1977 1978
IArtikel5
0
EGeblete Senator ffcrArbeitundSoziales in
Berlin1.1.76-30.6.77 1.230 806,585•241093••
U
TGebiete Bundesanstalt fürArbeit 1.1.76-31.12.78 1.830 1.935,406 751,270 125,219
S
CGebiete Sundesanstalt fürArbeit 1.1.76-31.12.78 460 452,955 169,604 28,229
H[.Gebiete
r ILBundesanstalt furArbeit .j
r iL1.1.76-31.12.78 |
r <L2.240|
r i[2.266,355
ι ιI869,536 |
r i[144,945
i
•A
NGebiete Bundesanstalt fürArbeit 1.1.74-31.12.78 3.120 3.083,698 1.171,489 195,260
0Technische
FortschritBundesanstalt fürArbeit - 1.5.76-31.12.77 400 306,725 166,440
»Behinderte Buhdcsndnistertum fürArbeitund
Soaialwdnyng -
»1.1.76-31.12.76 2,098,924
I
I

)I Γ I r^i 6 •
3«
}>.< /r 1976 -;1977 1978
Article 4
•.F
Κ
AMigrants
MigrantsInstitut deSciences Sociales appli­
quées ,Lyon
Centre Régionat d'Etudes etdePro­
motion duTravail (CREPT )1.2.76 -31.12.78
1.1.76 -31.12.78465
390103,075
«5,911123,330
49,224123,330
75,132
N
IMigrants
.*·.
iAssociât ion'duCentre de/PréformationLMarsaiLle I
i i1.1.76 -31.12.78^1.500
i i^61,215
I I^72,018
r iI 81,020
ί
mAgriculture Minist.del'Agriculture 1.1.76 -31.12.78 5.650 - 7.898,960 4.691,193 1.749,281
%
Agricultun Institut Nat.deFora.Prof,pourl'Animation desCollectivités1.1.76 -31.12.76 152
3144,035
:.
AgricultureCentre dePromotion deCorse (Corse )1.5.76 -n31.12 .77 60 37,775 27,019
Textile
HandicapésHin.del*Industrie etdela
Recherche
Nin.Santé Dir.Action Sociale1.1.76 -31.12.76
1.1.76 -31.12.76,1842
20équipes
pour 4000
handicapés691,064
603,148
Migrants C.A.N.A.-Centre d'Accueil Nord-
Africain1.1.76 -31.12.78 540 78,557 113,263 123,560
Migrane * Urtfort Chrétienne deJeunes Gens
(U.C.J.G. )1.1.76 -31.12.78 540 88,OS fC2,60 ? 117,709
Migrants Centre d'Enseignement technique et
Social delaChambre deCommerce de
Nîmes (C.E.T.S. )1.1.76 -31.12.78 90 4,141 5,401 6,302
Migrants Promotion Sociale destravailleurs
immigrés (P.S.T.I. )1.1.76 -31.12.78 1440163,238 187,737 215,894
[Migrants |
• * iIArada Hommes etMigrations 1.1.76 -31.12.78 I
i180 |
i[23,766 I
i i25,206 [26,106
i
Migrants Accueil etPromotion desEtrangers(A.P.E. )1.1.76 -31.12.78 135 16,564 18,220 20,043

2 3
Migrants
Migrants
0
Migrants
Migrants
Migrants
Migrants
Migrants
Migrants
Agriculture
Agriculture
Agriculture
rz-s-
Agriculture
AgricultureAssociation aideauxtravailleurs
étrangers (A.T.E.)
Association pourl'Accueiletla
Formation desTravailleurs migrants
(AFTAM)
Association Culturelle etamicalede:
familles d'Outre-mer «tmigrants
Association duCentredePréformatiot
deMarseille (ACPM)
Groupement desChambres deCommerce
etd'Industrie Hainaut-Cambrésis
Association Aideauxtravailleurs
d'Outre-mer (ATOM)
ACUCES-Association duCentreUniver­
sitairedeCoopération Economique et
Sociale
OfficeNationald'Immigration
8Centre'sdeFormation Profession­
nelle .privésreprouoéscarlePréfet
delaLoireAtlantique
8CentresdeFormation Profession­
nelleprivésregroupés parlePréfet
delaLoireAtlantique
Centredeformation professionnelle
etdelapromotion agricole
Ste.FemmessurLoire
CentredeFormation professionnelle
etdelapromotion agricole
SteFemmess.Loire
Chambrerégionale deCommerceet
d'Industrie-Provence-Côte d'Azur1976 197? 1978
31.12.78
31.12.78
31.12.78
31.12.78
31.12.76
31.12.78
31.12.76
31.12.77
31.12.76
31.12.76
/
30.5.76
31.5.75
31.12.79360
360
120
2700
100
340
1805
3*600
648
648
28
28
1.21516/042
36,801
10,803
281,594
15/059
88/003
345/064
674/086
173/351
411/966
18/716
9.5585/815
40/474
13,503
332.314
134/939
337/043
140,43512,819
44/525
18/004
390/896
155/179
191/747
1979:
225/055

-12-
1 2 34 56
1976 197? 1978
rTextile "StéMoutinages EmileRey 15.11.76-31.12.77 40 2,578 4,763
RTextile StéHoulinages EmileRey 15.11.76-31.12.7fl 40 1,729 5,735
ATextile BVRSA(EXE,BEN,PRI) 1.10.76-31.12.76 40 4,204
Textile BVRSA(EXE-PRI)-FNE 1.10.76-31.12.76 40 5,079
C<ΠΗ-βΕΝ-Ρυβ)
EJeunes IA.F.P.A. préformation 1.1.76-31.12.76 1.440 889,491
Jeunes [Secrétariat GénéraldelaFormation 1.1.76-31.12.76 22.670 •12.963,186 48,612
Professionnelle I
Jeunes SNCF 1.1.76-31.12.78 6.000 1.432,297 1.575,527 1.733,080
Jeunes Oescours etCabaud 1.1.76-31.12.78 68 30,986 34,394 38,177.
Migrants IAssociation Française pourle 1.10.76-1.10.78 8.200 148,867 654,877 817,739
Développement etl'Enseignement
«Techniques (A.F.D.E.T. )
/
*•••

-13-
Γ~ Γ– : : I I ■-6
1 5>1976 1977 1978
- $!Article 5]
• KIHandicapé *IAssociation Pont-Achard 1.1.76 -31.12.76 62 24.486
AHandicapés Association pour form.soc. aveugles
•tautres handicapés (A.P.S.A.H. ) 1.T.76 -31.12.76 173 847,505
Ν
(•Handicapés ;Association pour emploi parréin*
sert,prof.' <ASSERPR0 >1.1.76 -31.12.76 100 210.202
.L-.» • I
[Handicapés !. • * i
[C.E.T. Sinto »Puaoni • [1.1.76 -3t.12.7S II– I
I"I j7,6568,54r
Régions C.R.C.l .-Bretagne 1.1.76 -31.12.76 525 386,181 442,980 499,367
Régions Ch„d«CopA%rcA etd'Industrie de
l'Ariège1.1.76 -31.12.78 384 253,191 291,169 334,844
Régions CES! pasMotionné dsdc.1220 854.850,1 <1.064.241,59 1.291.097,35
Progrès
techniqueCETRAVM 1.1.76 -31.12.78 soo 579,836 669,129 769,549
Régions Préfet région Poitou-Charentes 1.4.76 -31.12.78 532 522,967216,004,85 120,073,13
Régions A.D.P.S.8 . 1.2.75 -31.12.78 1140 [ 505,942 558,789 633,612
Régions Assoc .Gérance d'écoles d*apprenti s-
L "HciVi "*fcéa,Poitou -Char ente s1.1>76 -31.12.78 : 950 344,241 389,550 461,641
Progrès t
techniqueC.R.C.l .de8«urg«gne (756) 1.11.76 -30.6:78 : 60 6,405 .49,345 34,365
Réglons INrAC pu mentionné 185 39,609
Régions R.CORSE 1.5.76 -30.7.77 .* 158 218,027 95,073
Régions C.E.P.T. pasa«ntfonné 1236 748,310 860,542 989,611
Réglons Secrétariat d'Etat aux Départements
d'Outre-oer
■• • .'•.' *-
* *1.1.74 -30.6.7712500 11.629,553 2.552,217
-^
-y

-14-
I i "T : : l T-~1 r " 6
21976 1977 1978
r Régions SNIA s 4.2.76 -30.6.77 200 413,456 192/743
R
AProgrès
techniqueCITEF (673 )Centre Internat ;Télé­
mécanique d'Enseignement etde
Formation1.1.76 -31.12.78 4700 138/641 155/134 177372
Ν Progrès
hnioueIFCE /SIfOP 15.2.76 -31.12.77 200 131/792 144/936
C
Régions CRCI deBretagne 1.10.76 -31.12.78 1800 360/989 1.985 /438 1.305 /798
C
Progrès
techniqueInstitut deRégulation etAutoma­
tion delaCCI d'Arles1.2.76 -31.12.78 306 . 18/004 21/605 26/1C6
Régions AFPA 1.1.76 -31.12.76 1520 1.633 /902
Régions SGFP 1.1.76 -31.12.76 1520 990/243
Réglons AFPA 1.1.76 -31.12.76 4570 3.328 /584
Régions ISGFP 1.1.76 -31.12.76 ,4570 1.852 /951
Régions CCIMidi-Pyrénées ALBI-CASTRES -
HAZAMET 1.©.76 "1.9.78 270 36/499 85/033 93,905
'JI IIsur» "" II1.À.76 -1.9.78 II270 I 40/889 | 93/319 j 104/811 "
Régions IPréfet Région Limousin CHRV-Limoge 1.10.76 -31.12.78 680 81/918 334,907 208/026
Régions Préfet deRégion Limousin
CHRV-Limoges1.10.76 -31.12.78
t680 113/105 465/992 253/355
Région
.tPréfet Région Limousin Fédération
Compagnonnique duBâtiment1.10.76 -31.12.78 130 36/009 189/046 207,051
Régions !Préfet Région Limousin S.G.F.P. 1.10.76 -31.12.78 130 14/404 74/718 85/521
Régions Préfet Région Limousin S.G.F.P. 1.10.76 -31.12.78 360 18/004 90/022 56/714
Régions Préfet Région Limousin S.G.F.P. 1.10.76 -31.12.78 360 31/508 108/027 108/027

-!S-
• 1r~[~ " ■.I.... · ■ 6
1 2« ?
19761977 !1978
»
RRégion»
RéglonsPréfetRégionAuvergneS.G.r.P.
PréfetRégionAuvergne-Ligier1.11.74-31.12.77
1.11.76-31.12.77438
43818,426
22,37657,979
67,126
A-.
N-
e
-E–Région»
Régions
..RéoJons
Régions
Régions
RégionsPréfetRégionAuvergne~C.C.I.
ÇlermeptFerrandIssoire
PréfetRégionAuvergne-S.G.f.P.
.PréfetdtRégionPoitou-Charentçs"«PECHA ■
S6FP
Préfet'deRégionPoitou-Charentes
S6FF1.11.76-31.n2.78
1.11.76-31.12.78
23.10.76-18.2.77
25.Υ0.76-18.2.77
25.10.76-9.3.77
25.10.76-9.3.77145
145
20
A
20
43
459,110
.16,636
5,905
5,719
12,141
10,522135,033
283,570
4,897
4,003
13,599
11,786135,033
283,570
-•w
»Régions PréfetRégionPoitou-tha rentes
C.C.I»-Angouléme-W6»
212
33,370
•· ν
Régions PréfetdoRégionPoitou-Charente *
tCFP-1976- 12 5,833
Régions
Régions
Régions
.Régions
RégionsPréfetdeRégionLimousin-C.C.I.
Ltaoges*CRCILinog.es
ChambredesMétiersHauteVienne
PréfetdeRégionLimousin S€FP
PréfetdeRégionLimousin
SAVIEM-WESTON-AOLER-S6F
PréfetRégionLimousin SGFP
PréfetRégionLimousin-Chambre
desMétiers15.1.76-1.9.78
'T5.1.76-T.9.78
15.1.76-1.9.78
15.1.76-1.9.78
15.1.76-1.9.78341
J41
390
390
4998,986
T25,22t
260,444
69,197
9,051 •137,428
222,355
152,999 J
i
47,578 |
10,26391,553
142,683
372,256
85,223
7,562
sProgrès
technique
Progrés
technique|CCI-Montpellier (VlMM)
ISGFP-(WIMfO
I >••.•15.9.96-31.12.77
15.9.76-31.12.77
/.544
54436,575
5,43073,151 |
10,861

-16-
I - ■ Ir " : ' : Γ 6
2 y■ *i > i
L 1I 77^ i
[ iv7o ii i
I HLL 1I 1975
F
R
AProgrès
technique
Progrès
techniqueUIMM -Creusot-loire
CUIHM )SGFP
%1.10.76 -31.3.77
1.10.76 -31.3.770
09,848
4,0789,848
4,078
. . I* i
i >
I-
N
C
Handicapés Ministère duTravail' (Centre ADAPT )1.10.76 -31.12.76 * 1172 1.056,203i
EHandicapés ]ONAC 1.1.76 -31.12.76 493 744,200 .
• ■· - I"s
Handi capéa'Ministère delaSanté (Centre de
IMulhouse )1.1.76 -31.12.76 175 288,071
Handicapé :
Handicapés
Handicapé :Ministère delaSanté (Centre de
Metz )
Ministère delaSanté (Centre de
Hérisson -03)
Ministère delaSanté (Centre A
URTP Paris )1.1.76 -31.12.76
1.1.76 -31.12.76
1.1.76 -31.12.7665
80
35103,027
171,042'
54,013
Handicapé :Ministère delaSanté (Centre
Auxilia -92Levallois Perret ) 1.1.76 -31.12.76 30 36,009
Handicapé
Handicapés>
Ministère delaSartté (CRIC ~31
Toulouse )
Ministère delaSanté (Centre Jean
Moulin 91-SteGeneviève desBois )1.1.76 -31.12.76
1.1.76 -31.12.7630
5545,011
105,866
Handicapés Ministère delaSanté (Centre de
Clairvivre ,24Excideuil )'1.1.76 -31.12.76 30 45,011
Handicapés Ministère delaSanté (Centre
"Crillonnais "44verton )1.1.76 -31.12.76 3C 45,011
. \1 '■-»
Handicapés Ministère duTravail -Provence
Côte d'Azur (St.Estève ) 1.1.76 -31.12.78 45 45,695 51,708 58,723
i

-17-
1 Γ !I–
I56
1 25_ J[1
| 1976I 1977 ! 1978
•. .e– 1
Handicapés Ministère duTravail -Provence
Côte d'Azur (Centre deHyères )1.1.76 31.12.78 45 173,410 199;4"2l% *; 229,334t
<■ .RHandicapés Ministère duTravail -Provence
Côte d'Azur (Centre .Chantoi seau ) 1.1.76 31.12.78 50 117,354 134,956 155,200i
t.
:. ; A
MHandicapés Ministère du-Travail -Provence
Côte d'Azur (Centre retour àlaVie .'1.1.7 » 31.T2.7S 120 ya,u»s ".i15*,538 175,284»
I
Ι-
οHandicapés Minisère duTravail -Provence .
Côte d'Azur (Centre "LaRose") 1.1.76 31.12.78 65 272,632 311,240 355,411l
.!
.ΕHandicapes Ministère duTravail -Provence
Côte d'Azur (Centre Richebois )1.1.76 31.12.78 120 358,442 409,528 468,009
ψ Handicapés Ministère duTravail Provence
Côte d'Azur (Centre "LaRoucuière )1.1.76 31.12.78 255 186,777 207,348 234,642
?Handicapés Ministère duTravail -Provence
Côte d'Azur (Centre deBriançon )1.1.76 31.12.78 495 140,354 159,019 180,246
.. ι
t
'• .I
■i'HandicapésIMinistère duTravail .-Direction
Sécurité Sociale (Centres deNancy
etBordeaux )1.1.76 31.12.76 270 731,056- ■■···: - . ι
Handicapés Union des Caisses Centrales dela
Mutualité agricole1.1.76 31.12.76 150 559,721
9Handicapés Union des Caisses Centrales dela
Mutualité agricole1.1.76 31.12.76 30 70,434
t
■II
Handicapés IVivre 1.1.76 31.12.76 30 60,585 62,205 66,976
Handicapés
I .
I
I
j.
I *' ■
iComité deLiaison d'alphabétisation
etdepromotion (CLAP )1.1.76 31.12.78 135 22,750 29,196 32,103.I;
■
• "

ι■
2 3
ARTICLE A
Agriculture Gaeltarra ELroann
Agriculture Paclene Co.
Agriculture Newmarket Cooperative Creameries
Textile Castlcguard Textile Co.
Textile I!IrishRopes
Handicapped
Agriculture
AgricultureI
NationalRiabilitati onBoard
|ShannonKcatLtd#
IDepartment ofEiucatxon
Agriculture ]Ballybqy TanneraLtd.
Young
PeopleAnCOIndustrial TrainingAuthority
Younj
People Department ofEducation
Toung
People Department ofEducation
Young
People Department ofEducation
Toung
People Industrial Development Authority )
ToungPeopl;DepartmentofBiucation )
YoungPeoplJ AnCO
YoungPeopljDepartment ofEduoation
Kigrant
WorkersNational Manpower Service-lu-
1.1.76-31.12.77
1.1.76-31.12.78
15.3.76-30.9.76
1.4.76-31.3.78
3.5.76-31.12.77
1.1.76-31.12.76
1.7.7Ó-31.12.77
1.1.76-31.8.78
1.1.76-31.12.79
15.10.76-30.9.78]
15.10.76-30.9.78)
1.1.76-31.8.77
1.9.76-31.8.78
1.1.76-31.12.77
1.1.76-31.12.78
1.1.76-31.12.76
1.1.76-31.12.77
•
1.1.76-31.12.761,099
82
16
300
70
90
42
328
35
50
50
400
492
50
50'
1,000
529
2001976
674,815
27,965
8,820
101,025
26,956
143,963
12,636
208,464
.11,760
26,640
640,608
312,696
96,636
51,720
600,000
127,212
52,272197?
118,673
26,790
35,676
44,967
11,465
565,632
.20,554
92,940]
54,960)
366,979
"848,448
47,341}
.32,160j
168,252197;
235,612
20,422
40,260
428,419h
21,949
7,292

19-
1 l. l :~H
> 4ΓΤΠ ■ 6 i
•ι,* 2 3I3
I 19761977 1197« I
XRegions–-1.–.II!■■■ 1 >1 }
ARTICLE 5
Kational Manpower Services 1.1.76-31.12.76 3,950-'v*
22,680«*
R
.A |I I
I JIAnCOIndustrialTrainingAuthority j
I i|1.1.76-31*1*76
!■ II5I
I I436,200 I
i• i
L AnCOIndustrial Training Authority
I1.1.76-31.12.76 1,500 184,843
'HButlersEngineering Ltd. 7.6.76-6.6.78 113 67,008 •
*'•100,615 33,629
'jD«I OlenAbbeyLimited 1.9.76-31.12.77 85 .19,546 41,218
M DeLaRue–Saurfit 30.8.7ο-31.12.73 '57f"33,545 29,603 41,661
1
.»
»Ν
» TbooasdeLa.Ruo&Co.Ltd. 6.9.76-31.1.78 200 67,726 159,797 42,809
nme l
JohnA.WoodLtd.
I[2.8.J6-1.11.76
I|105
I32,673 j
1i
I
t»..IrishRubberLtd. 20.9.76-1.7.77 101 17,822 18,204
»AdhesiveTapes(Export)Ltd. 17.9.76-31.12.77 46 20,542 '21,802
IΗIJ).A.(industrial Development
Authority ) 1.10.76-31.12.78 3,079 1,072,079 1,614,428 918,102
ΗI
lDepartment ofEducation-Certain
Vocational Education Committee 4.10.76-31.9.77 856 31,200 76,9201
*•
,1'.ftDublinMeatPaekersLiaitcd 1.11.76-1.11.77 55 14,880 26,472
-'l

t
Ι–πI !rrn 6 ii-i
i2 3*■■I5|
L Ii~r
[lv7o 1977 J?73 t
X
RReglona PharaonTextiles Ltd. 18.10.76-31.3.77 123 10,414 59,009•*.'T.;'
■-
.!
ι IInc.FoodFroducta ,Sligw (1*0^£iit-rI
IAW«44*1V I« II I
I...I9»324 6,216I
!
L
k*n Wyett(Ireland)Ltd# 18.11.76-31.12.7C 70 12,905 38,834 7,435
Κ!
I*'" ArklowÇypsumLimited 6.12.76-1.11.73 66 4,754 57,905 33,603 I
D'
II ■
in'ScriptoIndustries ,ShannonLtd.
*•6.1?.76-1.3.77 13 4,212 13,9
I'
!
II
«\[
!
J'
S

1 I ~I–
i • _____ 6 •'i
1i *- i
I Iiy i
L- I[19VÓ11977 11"7S I
I
\
'ι*»
* 1
Handicapped•••*;■ *
PolidFollowship - 1.1.76-31.12.76 16 7,800
:*Çi. IIHand!cappedf•Réhabilitation Instituts |I..– I
I*.1.1O–Jl.ltr /V-jI... I
I«fV I462,0C0l
1
:l
»j.Handicapped Central Remedial Clinic 1.1.76-31.12.76 60 60.000
ia.Handicapped CherryCroupTraining Workshop 1.1.76-31.12.76 .30 10,120
■:*Bandicapped RetosLtd. 1.1.76-31.12.76 30 35,633
."!»Handicapped CorkPolio&Cenerai Aftcì^-Carc
Association 1.1.76-31.12.76 105
182,972
Kandicappod St.Michael'sRouse•».1_7fi–V!-17. 60 61.425
Hanoicapped R«S«n»Ltd. 1.1.76-31.12.76 8 7,834
ί.Λ.
ιRegions IrishIndustrial Training Authority
AnCO 1.1.76-31.12.77 8,354 9,248,479 2,950,490
Regions•' . I
IrishManagementïnâtitute(IMI)Il
I1.1.76-31-5.Î7 3,645I
720,000 I1
132,000 I1
Regions BallyfreeFormsLtd* 20.4.76-30.9.76 26 18,936 -:•
I-Regions TheIrishTinesLtd* 1.5.76-31.12.7s 126 120,984 256,190 114,329 [
Regions Shannon FreeAirportDevelopment
Co.Ltd. 1.1.76-31.12.76 193 74,144
i:Regions IE.S.B.,Electricity SupplyBoard I1.3.76-30.9.78 100 83,131 19,186 25,058 I
Regions I.TheLeinstor LeaderLtd. 26.7.76-1.8.77 29 21,991 7,644
«•;Regions .
ί■"
i ■IrishCartonPrinters/CartonReport!
Ltd. I-.3.76.-31.12.78 29 38,057 36,718•r
45,048 f
f:
\
i-

Regions
Regions
Regions
Régions
Regions
Regions
Handicapped
Handicapped
Handicapped
Handicapped
Har.dlcappe ::
Handicapped
Handicapped
Handicapped
Handicapped
Handicapped
Handicapped
Handicapped
Handicapped
HandicappedI.D.A.
Î.J.K.
AnCo-Industrial Trainir.g Authorit ,
Department ofBiucation
C.E.R.T.
Department ofEducation
National Rehabilitation 3oard
National Rehabilitation Board
Kati'onal Rehabilitation Beard
National Rehabilitation Board
r«
RetosLimited
Rehabilitation Institute
NorthWestern Health Board
NorthEastern HealthBoard
Eastern HealthEoard
SouthEastern HealthBoani
Southern HealthBoard
Kid-Western HealthBoard
Western KealthEoard
Kidland HealthBoard2>-
31.12.78 4,432
-.7.73 63
31.3.77 650
31.3.77 650
31.3.73 432
31.8.78 43?
31.12.75 430
31.12.76 1.300
3i.i2.76 .500
31.12.76
31.12.76 81
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.76350
?
?
31.12.76 ?
31.12.76 ?
31.12.76 ?
31.12.76 ?■
31.12.76 ?
31.12.76 ?iv/o
1,886,332
34,625
1,728,480
256,740
73,985
71,160
36,000
277,202
118,800 ,
12,000
73,322
462,000
500,760
66,871
276,600
290,434
312,504
170,846
461,352
216,432iv/7
1,008,246
86,561
1,397,680
295,800
262,704
296,8201770
6?9Î8S7
51,933
199,450
3M.112

•i •i».-23-' •
• I
Γ"Τ r* -■: !....... I
• ^I■ I
■ J : i
* . * ίι ■>_J1976 !1 19771 V>78r
■■ Ι·–η
IArticle * -*·'Γ'
I
t
-iur
. ;x
I
"» eHandicapés Ministère duTravail (H.M.C.ï1.1.76 -31.12.78 10 13/153 26,365 26,366I
I
Handicapés Association d'Assurance contre
tesaccidents1.1.76 -31.12.78 90 5,035 20,139 30,139
' •
vv ;!jH' Article 5
I
iB
ν-:. 0Handicapés
ι··,Office deplacement etderééduca­
tion professionnelle destravail­
Leurs handicapés7.3.76 -31.12.78 11 -18,500
«'.19,500 9,000
v •-!u
•iι ...
Hand lapés
IOffice deplacement etderééduca­
tion professionnelle destravailler7.3.76 -31.12.78
s10 17,000 ;19,000 5,800
■ h handicapes
V .!.G
I
.*• -,
*... '
',i* ■Handicapé :
*Office deplacement etderéédu­
cation professionnelle destravail­
leurs handicapés7.3.76 -31.12.78 4 2,500 3,500 2,000
•...
;i-
*
ih-*•.'
i •• •
«
-•" !
• i
\
ê ;j
ii
il
{

–0
Landbouw
Migre rende
werknemerï
Textiel *-
Industrie
Textiel­
industrie
Textiel­
industrie
Jongeren
Jongeren
Jongeren
Migrerend
uerknemerArtikel 4
Ministerie vanSociale Zaken
Ministerie van Onderwijs en
Wetenschappen
»iy»Cordal »7aicen .
Ministerie vanSociale Zaken
Ministerie van Sociale Zaken
Ministerie vanSociale Zaken
Ministerie van Sociale Zaken
Ministerie van Sociale Zaken
Ministerie vanOnderwijs en
Wetenschappen1.76 -31.12.76
.12.76 -31.12.77
,1.76-31,12.76
.1.76 -31.12.76
.1.76 -31.12.76
.1.76 -31.12.76
.1.76 -31.12.76
.1.76 -31.12.76
.12.76 -1.7.77
I5Γ ■ 6
1 II 1977 .II 1075 '
I
340 575.691I . v
I *
1.500 5.928 65.205
/
>
1.100 883.978l
' ft
t
900 621.547ï
i
I
if
3.250 794.199
t
170 46.961
245 101.519.• •• (
1.000 • .414.365
i
120 4.627 27.831
I
l
t
I
ι
*
t

-25-
I–■■■■
I___
6
ι
:I 2l
IΤ .ι
ιi
I* I
• i ii.y"ó |I %Ann I
*7ί/ I1rvn9ari
χ
Article 5».
.)
ΝGebieden Ministerie vanSociale Zaken 1.1.76 31.12.76 1.380 1.214.870
Ε
D
eGebieden Ministerie vanSociale Zaken 1.1.76 31.12.76 2.825 1.926.743
•·Ι
RTechnische Ministerie vansociaieI
taxerr iI*A"»<
II.I.IU 51.12.76 1.800 1.469.614 I.
IVooruit-
Λ.
Ν·gang
DGehandi*'
captenIMinisterie vanSociale Zaken 1.1.76 31.12.76 700 958.322
•%
Gehandi-Ministerie vanSociale Zaken 1.1.76 31.12.76 25 20.028
capten .
Gehandi-Ministerie vanSociale Zaken 1.1.76 31.12.76 ,55 30.725
capten
GehandirMinisterie vanSociale Zaken 1.1.76 31.12.76 950 2.021.374
capten
i
I.'
I
I ••-
I·,
II ■/'
! "
i
i •ιi

I.
it 2r~– 13 I
I56 1
[ : : i
r i'.»/6 1977 [ 1?73 :
Κ ·Articolo 4\
* •.....
IMigranti Associazione Nazionale Addestra * 1.4.76 -31.3.77 450 1.431,199 620.183
mento Professionale (A.N.A.P. )
Migranti Ente Nazionale ACLI "Istruzione 1.1.76 -31.8.77 15.943 2.440.672 1.763,344j
i*I •
II u*«ci\
«twiC^rf iwiiWk «>* %h.•arr«*••mf •ii. i
I ■ Ii i
I Ii i
I Ii • . ■ '
I ,
I
; I. Minorati
I .Provincia di.Trieste 1.3.76 -31.12.78 600 351,924 378/857 425/649 i
ITessili Regione Emilia Romagna 1.2.76 -31.7.76 230 538/388
!«|Agricoltura Regione Lombardia 1.1.76 -30.9.76 5.209 1.055 /380:
Agricoltura Regione Lombardia 1.11.76 -30.9.77 4.927 330/970 992/910
Agricoltura Reaione Emilia Romagna 1.1.76 -31.12.76 17f<I
I107/088.' •i
iAgricolture .IRegione del Veneto 1.1.77 -31.12.78 6.848 2.958 /077 2.958,077
Agricoltura legione Autonona della Valle 1.1.77 -30.11.79 200 219,927 126/104
d'Aosta 119/9:74/316
Agricoltura Istituto Addestramento Lavoratori 1.1.77 -31.12.78 ',020 1.009,597 1.514 /396
Tessili E.H.I. Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi 23.8.76 -23.11.76 6U !i 117/624
SAPEL
!
4iTessili Regione Emilia Romagna 1.1.76 -31.12.76 120 109/551l
i
Tessi li Regione Emilia Romagna 1.1.76 -31.12.76 90 20/000ι
1
i
Tessi li Regione Toscana 1.1.77 -31.12.78 5.568 975/209 I1.778,391 !
Tessili Regione del Veneto 1.1.77 -30.6.77 117 186,120I
Tessili Regione del Veneto 1.1.77 -30.6.77 909 1.378,9951
I
-• !
ITessili . Regione del Veneto i1.1.77 -31.12.79 600I . I
i i 90,346 !108,461 i
11979 :63,058
I
IITessili Regione del Veneto 1.1.77 -31.12.78 360 74,400 74,400
♦• 4

Tessili
Giovani
Giovani
Giovani
Migranti
Migrant1
Migranti
Migranti
MigrantiE.N.I.-EnteNazionale Idrocarburi
I
Ministero delLavoro/Regioni
CentroNord
RegioneToscana
CameradiCommercio industria
artigianato eagricoltura di
Keggiotmilia .
Ministero delLavoroedellaPrevi­
denzaSocialePubblica
Ministero degliAffariEsteri
RegionedelVeneto .
EnteConfederale Addestrasento
Professionale dellaConfederazione
Senerat.*ItaLiana .delLavarn
(S.C.A.P.-C.G.I.L. )
Istituto perlaFormazione e
l'Orientamento deiLavoratori-27-
1.1.77-31.12.7 7
1.1.77-31.12.77
1.1.77-30.6.77
1.10.76-31.12.7S
1.7.76-30.6.77
1.9.76-31.12.7S
1.1.77-31.12.78
15.10.76-30.6.77
1.7.76-31.1.78L * : : : -
•.. Iiv7o |i 1
;ιν/7 Γ'7ο :
'222
36.850 12.336,410405.773
1.470 1.588.152
225 117,600 784,400 .886,000
32.000 311,200 423,200
«1,995,052 7,671,335 .9,222,683
360 210,-600 336,960
490 14,600 43,000
1.740 373,987
* •*
Ç18,157
i
»
i
». «
v
\

-28-
II- i– :– ! :nI .■a I 6
1 2 3 '|51976 1977 1978
Ii .- :
Articolo S31
Τ Minorati E.N.A.I.P. 1.1.76 -31.12.76 100 326,376
A Minorati E.N.A.I.P. 1.1.76 -31.12.76
/200 308.818
Minorati Regione Emilia.Romagna1.1.76 -31.12.77 80 81,556 59,576
I Regioni Α.Ν.Α.Ρ . 1.4.76 - 77 1.290 3.923,780 1.395,302
*L
Regionii_ -i
IE.N.X. Ente Na2ionale Idrocarburi Icorrente lvro,Vffi
1978L- I
[3.912 IL
*.291,141L.. i
I6.784,647 I10.029,0
Regioni Regione Abbruzzo12.5.76 - 696 743,220
Regioni Cassa perilMezzogiorno20.3.76 - 719 1.698,297 252,540
Regioni E.N.E.L. corrente 1976 e
19773
149 876,481 292,157
Regioni
RegioniA.N.A.P.
Regione Basilicatacorrente 1976 e
.1977
.8.76 -150
J
1.255459,033
...458,766162,171
1.007,604
Regioni Regione Puglia .6.76 - 1.950 1.257,127 1.889,430
Regioni Regione Molise 12.5.76 - 600 583,680
Regioni Regione Lazio25.5.76 - 2.T40 2.179,848
Regioni Gestione Partecipazioni Industriali corrente 1976 e
1977 500 883,120 970,306
Regioni I.R.I. 1.1.76 -31.12.77 9.244 a)
b)
c)
d)'4.117,231
2.864,163
1.583,824
985,6961.322,012
1.167,197
1.100,523
124,628
Prog .Tçoh .Unioncamer o
■•..r1.1.77 -31.12.79 120 142.400 342,400 614(400

-29-
l I1I~Ππτπ 6
1 2 5* . 51976 1977 1978
I
TRegioni l.R.I. 1.7.76 -31.12.78 10.414 a)2.064,215
b) 616,249
c)2.568,602
d)658,1426.766,266
646,996
4.555,985
205,6483.647,980
3,510,256
Regioni E.N.I. 1.9.76 -31.12.78 53 25,650 116,879 7,330
i
Regioni E.N.I. 1.10.76 -31.12.78 127 63,374 269,290 191,024
i
A I.Regioni |LE.N.E.L. I
r iL1-10.76 -31.12.77 ]
r iL<8° I
r iL 404,090 |
i iL367,894 |
r i
Regioni Regione Lazio 1.7.76 -31.12.77 145 . 172,080 172,080
Regioni E.F.l.M. 20.9.76 -31.12.78 155 53,078 497,893 46,167
Regioni SACIEN 1.10.76 -31.12.78 190 62,019 548,438 94,307
Regioni IProvincia autonoma diTrento 1.11.76 -31.12.78 153 55,017 283,188 210,173
Minorati Regione Lombardia 1.1.76 -31.12.76 1.359 1.374,527
Minorati Associazione Nazionale Mutilati
Invalidi del Lavoro (A.N.M.I.L. ) 1.1.76 -31.12.76 75 197,880
Minorati Associazione Nazionale Mutilati
Invalidi del Lavoro (A.N.M.I.L. )1.1.76 -31.12.76 180 613,200 399,600
Minorati .Associazione Nazionale Mutilati
Invalidi Lavoro (Centro di
Cagliari1.12.76 -31.7.78 .15 9,320 78,040 46,720
»Minorati Associazione Nazionale Mutilati
Invalidi Lavoro (Centro diLivorno )1.12.76 -31.7.78 15 7,920 61,880 39,120
Minorati Associazione Nazionale Mutilati
Invalidi Lavoro (Centro diMilano )1.12.76 -31.7.78 15 8,160 64,920 38,480 -
Minorât 1 Associazione Nazionale Mutilati
Invalidi Lavoro (Centro diPistoia )1.12.76 -31.7.78 15 7,760 61,960 36,080

1 2 3% 5I 6
19761977 1978
1 #Hnotati Associazione Nazionale Mutilati 1.12.76 -31.7.78 30 16,080 127,040 77,040
Invalidi Lavoro (Centro diRoma )
Minorati Associazione Nazionale Mutilati 1.12.76 -31.7.78 15 7,360 63,160 37,920
* Invalidi Lavoro (Centro di I
Spoltore )
L
Minorati iiAssociazione Nazionale Mutilati 1.12.76 -31.7.78 19 16,400 64,800 38,000
X Invalidi Lavoro (organizzazione
L. L.edamministrazione deicorsi ). |L L. L IL IL
A

Ii ι– I ' ' 'ιn–r-^ 6
1 3«1976 1977 1978
[/1TICL!Î4:Jt.
U[Agriculture [TrainingServioe8Agency 1.1.76-31.12.76 75218.472ê
Handioapped [QueenElizabethFoundation 1.1.76-31.12.78 32159.886 179.870 197,858
ZHandicapped Dept*ofHealthkSocialSecurity 1.1.76-31.12.76 156,000
T.Handicapped Baployment ServiceAgenoy 1.1.76-31.12.76 6.210 223,469
IHandicapped Northern Ireland Deot.ofSooial
Servioes . 1.1.76-31.12.76 127,464
HanitiAfltvnA^J L IL_ IL. L.Y
1rServices 1.1.76-31.12.76 32,023
!*Agriculture NorthernIrelandDept.ofAgricul­
ture 1.1.76-31.12.76 215 197,040
!I
*agriculture NorthernIrelandDepartment of
Agriculture 1.1.76-31.12.76 3499417,609
atextile Horthern IrelandDevelopment of
Manpower Services 1.1.76-31.12.76 415538,840
0
0textile Training Servioes Agency.Enploynent
Services Agendy Ll.76-31.12.76 8502,353,916
XTextile CottonandAlliedTextiles 1.1.76-31.12.76 4,620 727,500 774,756'
.Agriculture Northern IrelandD.M.S. 1.1.76«.31.12.76 250331,829
Agriculture ]Northern IrelandD.M.S. 1.1.76-31.12.76 505 275,200
Agriculture Northern IrelandB.M.S. 1.1.76-31.12.76 160 240,000
Agriculture northern Ireland D.M.S. 1.1.76-31.12.76 1,0652,576,062
Agriculture Department ofManpower Services
Northern Ireland 1.1.77-31.12.78 90 88.152 17,630 •
Agriculture Department ofManpower Servioes
Northern IrelandL.1.77-31.12.78 600 475,200 142,560
Textile ItieTraining Scrviocs Agenoy S..7.76-31.12.76 8502,263,308
foungPeopljRoadTransport IndustryTrainingBoard i25.10.76-18.11.77 100 7.110 40,290
[YoungPeôpll\TrainingServiert«Jgoncy I1.1.76-31.12.76 3.0006,810,029
1(
. i r 1
«>*'■1 ■'.'!■WP"irI.'sip–■■■■M»II.• I.

-32-
ίΊI" ! : ι «
i 2I|5
I1976 1977 1978
υfoungPeopnAylesbury Industrial GroupTraining
Centre 1.9.76-31.8.78 84 6,408 18,792 12,000
H
IyoungPeople }Ihgineering Industrial Training
Board♦Training Service Agency 1.1.76-30.6.76 84 134,400i
Τ
ILjfoungPeople
HouiLePeonieShipbuilding Industry Training Board
I+TrainingServiceAgency |
BcDartment ofEholcxment . !
[(Comaunxty Industry; j1.1.76-30.6.76
1.1.76-31.12.76750j
1,310 |
I840,000
3,064,320
DYoungPeopleNorthern IrelandDepartment orV.ai>-
jpowerServices1.1.76-31.1?.771,485 4,51b,065 1,985,131
ïoungPeoplej
1 1TrainingServicesAgency )I1.1.76-3i.i2.76 )1,740)*.603,896)I
i
X.YoungîteoplejTrainingServicesAgency j1.1.76-31.12.76)4,129j
3,011/j
l )4,201,550jj
I[foungPeople]TrainingServices Agency )1.1.76-31.12.76 )|2,510,897jj
HYoungPeopleTrainingServioesAgency )1.1.76-31.12.76)809)1,977,995 )|
0
τ\Handioapped Department ofHealthandSocial
Security I1.1.76-31.12.76
r2,112
!1,263,400 |
"I
0!.nandicapped SDOttish Homeai.dHealth 1.1.76-31.12.76621 !5*>,376 i
ΚI
Migrant
workersI
1HomeOffice
11.1.76-31.12.761 j
j128,830 j1,045,297
Migrant
WorkersTrainingServices Agency(National
CentreforIndustrial Language
Teaching )1.1.76-31.12.76 200 86,550

V
s
I
?■
κ
s
0
Ο
e
*Régions
Réglons
Begioas
Segions
Regions
Regions
Regions
Regions
Regions'
Regions
Regions
Reglens
Régions
Régions
Régions
RégionsJBTICLE 5
Cowtsulds Ltd*NorthernIreland
SECTartineGenerations Ltd*
Northern Ireland
lairdsPachaging
Betten*Dorward Ltd.
Department ofManpower Services
Department ofKanpower Services
StrelikLtd.NorthernIreland
Davidson &Co.Ltd..
Department ofE&ucKtlon,Northern
Ireland
StaithBros.Ltd.Whitehaven ,
RegionCunhria '
National Federation ofFruitand
PotatoTradesLtd*
AirTransport and'RraVelIndustry .
Training Board
SoottishDevelopment Agency(Sioras
Baplo>oent Services Agency
BritishGasCorport&tioa .-J
Bepartùeat cfAgriculture ,Jfortken ;
ΪΜ1*»4 ·.:1.1.76
11.3.76
2.7.76
1.1.76
1.2.76
1.1.76
1.1.76
1,4.76
1.1,76
1*2.76
1.1*76
1.1.76
1.1.76,
1.1.7*:– 1 6
4 >1976 1977 1978
31.12.78
»1,259 759,487 1.148,650••
812.786
/
31.12.77 126 33,382 65.018
31.12.76 26 18,000
I
IL–.I
t-°IL-^ I|25.20CT |L - I
I·,**>L
31.J2.78 2,945 2,109,967 501,413
107 173,400 22,800 6.000
30.5.77 106 19,200 9,360 * .
31.12.77 15 38.228 38,228
31.12.76 .J1,921 758,4001
31.8.76 50 18,000
31.12.78 161 10,594 8,400 8,400
31.12.76 100 283,675
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.3.781,«07
450
1,124.25,296
175,920
427,200 213,600
3X.lt.7«

1 2 3
υRegione Department ofManpowerServices 1.1.76-
MRegions Department ofManpower Services 1.1.76-
Regions Department ofManpowerServices 1.1.76-
IRegions Department ofManpower Servioes 1.1.76-
τRegions RoylanCaravan Co.Ltd. 1.1.76-
*•iRpHona I
l* ILAbbev.MeatPackersLtd* . I
i- .Ll.1.76-
I
DRegions HotelEverglades 1.1.76-
Regions GilbertTunneyEngineering Ltd.1.6.76-
Regions Training Services Agency 1.8.76-
ΚRegions Training Services Agency 1.8.76-
IRegions Training Servioes Agenoy 1.8.76-
VRegions Training Servioes Agency 1.8.76-
0Regions TrainingServioesAgency |1.8.76-
DRegions BuchanMeatProducers 1.1.76-
0
«Regions ICateringIndustryTraining Board 6.9.76-
κ
[Regions CateringIndustryTraining Board 6.9.76-
Regions C.E.G.B. 7.10.76-
Regions jBerkshireInternational (UK)Ltd.15.10.76
Regions NorthernIrelandTraining Executive 1.11.76-
1Regions _S&PHarrisLtd. 1.8.76-
Regions StsithBrothers(Whitehaven )Ltd.1.8.76--34-
5Γ 6 '
1976 197711978
1,000 540,000
940 1,103,297
250 110.081 35,678
1,750 1,711,954 370,570
30 16,502 2,153
347 !
1L•73*073 I
1L4U314 '!
r 1L
r
60'28,752 15,413
95 20,520 18,180 16,596
8,500 2,983,279 10,238,018
4,100 1,150,231 4,835,808
6,400 2,174,189 9,140,736
4,726 1,578,422 6,636,010
130114,360 |160,104 j
85 35,633 3,960
116 15,331 [39,590[24,895
r
542 138,326 j412,056 306,857
640 254,107 242,333 40,390
126 17.510 23,148 12,607
100 10,358
I• I73,496 13,405
100I79.200 264,000 j|7,200
h
50 6,000

n2
i»Regions|
«Region*I
Regioni I
*Region*I
«
Kegions I
O
Regions I
Regions I
1[Technical 1
Fro6-ress I
II
Tech:'.ical I
1FrotTess I
ΡJroursof!
ï-r.Jcrtaxirvf
Ρ
«Handicapped ]
KinJicarrcd
iiuî.'.icvr 1-
i
i
HanilcarpecTrainingService»Agency
Training Service»Agency
COSIRA(ConncilforsaallIndustrie
Department ofManpowerServioes
'Korthera Ireland
A/epartaenr orr.anpower
Northern Ireland
Department ofKar.poverServices
Northern Ireland
Korthern IrelandElectfricity Ser­
vies
C»E»C#B.(CentralElectricity
Generating Board)
JointStandingCorjiittee forthe
National Sewopaper Industry
AirTransport andTravelIndustry
Training Board
Ibplojcent Services k^tneyana
Training Services Agency
Fi-plovncnt Servicer A<;cr.cyand
Training Services A,;er.oy
D^pirtr.ent ofy.v:powerServices
Northern Ireland
Bcpartccnt ofXar.pcverServices
Northern Ireland1.1.76
1.1.76
:1.1.76
1.1.76
1.1.76
1,1.76
1.9.76
1.9.76
1.9.76
1.1.77
r
1.1.76
1.1.76
1.1.76
1.1.76-y-
1976 1977 1978
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.15.76
31.12.77
31.12.77
31.12.76
31.8.78
1.9.78
31.12.78
31.12.79
31.12.76
31.12.76
31.12.761,575
1,575
35
280
165
300
90
150
7,200
715
730
12,000
200511,200
132,720
32,515
220,613
501,785
540,000
208,140
110,075
612,000
2.973,686
2,9^,000
.155,65248,290
220,570
724,610
620,941
3,000,000
83,700556,186
497,012
3,626,400
83,700
1?79»33,700
31.12.76 22 66,840