COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Brussels, 10.11.2000
COM(2000) 725 final
Proposalfora
COUNCIL DECISION
concerning the Community position withintheAssociation Councilonthe participation
of[country] in Community programmes
Recommendation for a
COUNCIL DECISION
authorising the Commission to negotiatea frameworkagreement with Cyprus, Malta
and Turkey concerning theirparticipation inCommunity programmes
(presented bythe Commission)
2EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1. I NTRODUCTION
The European Council held in Helsinki in December 1999 confirmed the enlargement process
launched at its meeting of December 1997 in Luxembourg. The enhanced Pre-Accession
Strategy defined in 1997 was reiterated, which includes the participation of the 13 candidate
StatesinCommunityprogrammesasanimportant partofsuchstrategy.
The term " Community programmes " designates here an integrated set of actions adopted by
the Community, over a period ofyears, inorderto promote co-operation between its Member
States in different specific fields related to Community policies. They have been conceived, in
principle exclusively, for EU Member States, on the basis of a specific allocation from the
General Budget of the European Union. Consequently those programmes whose beneficiaries
are not Member States of the Union but non-EU countries (i.e. the Phare,TacisandMeda
programmes) are not covered bythis definition.
As regards the ten candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEECs)1,
participation in Community programmes is provided in their respective Europe Agreements.
Pursuant to the Europe Agreements, the conditions and modalities of these countries’
participation are defined by the respective Association Councils on the basis of specific
Decisions.
Nevertheless, following the European Council's conclusions in Luxembourg and Helsinki, the
Commission, in its Communication of 20 December 1999 on "Participation of candidate
countries in the Community programmes, agencies and committees" [COM(1999) 710 final],
proposed to the Council to streamline the Community procedures required to adopt these
AssociationCouncilDecisions.
2. C URRENT SITUATION
In fact, actual participation of the CEECsplusCyprusin the Community programmes
currently open to them has been actively encouraged since the Luxembourg European
Council. Following the entry into force in 1997 and 1998 of a series of decisions by the
Association Councils, nationals of the ten CEECshave been participating part in Community
programmes in several fields. Cyprus, for its part, is involved in programmes relating to the
audiovisual industry, education, vocational training and young people, as provided for in the
agreements concluded in 1997 (more recently, in the field of scientific research and in the
SMEsprogramme). Maltahas startedto participate in the programmes dealing with education
(Socrates) and vocational training ( Leonardo da Vinci ) since September 2000; its
participation in the Youthprogramme willbeginas of1 January2001.
Turkeyhas notyet participatedfullyinCommunityprogrammes.
1Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and
Slovenia.
3Experience has shown that legal preparations for the participation of the ten CEECsrequired
more than 100 individual (i.e. one by country and programme) decisions by the Association
Councils between 1997 and 1999. The adoption of such decisions took between six and ninemonths, for which reason some of the decisions came into force when the period covered by
theprogrammeswasalreadywellunder way.
In the light of this experience, the Commission proposed in the above-mentioned
Communication that a new approach should be adopted to the participation of the candidate
countries in the new generation of Community programmes, taking advantage of the fact that
most ofthese programmes are being replaced by new programmes either at the end of 1999 or
in2000.
At anyrate, as a consequence of the Community renewal of programmes (in which candidate
countries' participation is foreseen), on the one hand, and the renewed application for
participation by these countries, on the other, bilateral legal instruments setting up the terms
of participation will have to be concluded, in the shape of decisions by the Association
Councils in the case of the CEECsand agreements or additional protocols to the association
agreements inthe case of Cyprus,MaltaandTurkey.
Following the applications made by the candidate countries to participate in the present and
future programmes, on the basis of the current Community procedures in this field more than
150 new international instruments would be necessary, within the next few months, in order
to formalise this kind ofparticipation.
In the case of Cyprus,MaltaandTurkey, a double Commission-Council procedure would
be needed since for each individual Agreement a negotiating mandate should be
recommended previously by the Commission to the Council. In addition, the EuropeanParliament would have to be consulted on each Commission proposal regarding the draft
individualAgreements.
This scenario would overload both the usual EU inter-institutional relations and the requiredadministrative tasks bythe Commission. Among candidate countries, it would aggravate their
current disappointment as regards the protracted Community procedures to formalise their
participation in programmes. It should be recalled that authorities from these countries
unanimously welcomed the streamlined procedures the Commission proposed for this matter
in its above-mentioned Communicationto the Councilof20 December 1999.
3. N
EW APPROACH
To simplifytherefore the procedures to adopt such international instruments, the Commission
proposesnowtotheCouncil:
a) to adopt a series of 10 Decisions concerning the Community position within the
respective Association Councils regarding framework Association Council Decisions on
theparticipationof CEECsin the Communityprogrammes opened up to them;
b) to authorise the Commission to negotiate 3 framework agreements with Cyprus,Malta
andTurkeyontheir participation inCommunityprogrammes.
4In both cases, these international instruments should establish the general principles for the
participation inCommunityprogrammes ofanycountryapplying to do so and leave decisions
on specific participation procedures to the Commission. These procedures, especially the
financial conditions, would subsequently be laid down either in Financing Memoranda (in
case of support by Community external assistance such as Phare) or in ordinary Memoranda
of Understanding between the Commission and the Government of the candidate country
concerned.
3.1. Regarding candidate countriesfromCentraland Eastern Europe (CEECs)
The main issues addressed in the proposed draft framework Decisions of the
AssociationCouncilsarethe following:
a) the programmes concerned will be those whose Community Decisions or
Regulations establishing them (adopted by either the EU Council or the European
Parliament and the EU Council) provide for CEEC participation;
b) the CEECs will pay each year a contribution to the programmes, to be established
in the Financing Memoranda or Memoranda of Understanding mentioned above.
This contributionwill not be reimbursed to the CEEC if, at the end of the year, the
results fallshortofthecontributionpaid;
c) representatives from the CEECs will be invited to attend meetings of the
Programme Committees as observers, for the points whichconcernthem;
d) projects and initiatives submitted by participants from the CEECs shall be subject
to the same conditions, rules and procedures pertaining to the programmes
concerned as are applied to Member States, regarding in particular the
submission, assessment and selectionofapplications and projects;
e) the framework decisions will apply for an unspecified period, subject to a
classical clause of denunciation. Specific duration of participation in programmes
will be determined in the subsequent Memoranda to be concluded between the
Commission and the Government concerned.
3.2. Regarding Cyprus, Malta andTurkey
In order to formalise with these three candidate countries the same kind of
participation in programmes as that proposed for the CEECs, a different type of
international instrument is needed. This is due to the fact that the legal scope of the
respective Association Agreements in force with Cyprus,MaltaandTurkeysince
1973, 1971 and 1964 respectively ("old generation") do not provide for participation
in Community programmes, contrary to the "Europe Agreements" concluded with
the 10CEECs("last generation" of Association Agreements which came into force
between1994 and 1999).
Instead of "framework Decisions of the Association Councils" applicable to the
CEECs, equivalent framework agreements should be negotiated bilaterally between
the Commission and Cyprus,MaltaandTurkey, on the basis of relevant
negotiating mandates bythe EU Council.
5The main issues addressed in the framework agreements would be the same as those
envisaged forthe CEECs(see 3.1 above), except itema.
In fact, virtually all legal acts establishing Community programmes and allowing
CEECparticipationenvisage participation of Cyprusas well. However participation
ofMaltais less commonly foreseen and that of Turkey is almost unusual.
Nevertheless, the conclusions of the Helsinki European Council put on an equal
footing the 13 candidate countries as far as the Pre-Accession Strategy is concerned,
including "participation in programmes".
For this reason, the future framework agreements should allow participation of
Cyprus,MaltaandTurkeyin all Community programmes which are opened to the
CEECs.
In the light ofthe above, the Council is invited to:
•adopt the annexed proposals for 10 Decisions concerning the Community position within
the respective Association Councils set up in the Europe Agreements concluded with the
ten candidate countriesofCentraland Eastern Europe (CEECs) ;
•decide that the Commission shall be authorised to negotiate with Cyprus,Maltaand
Turkey, in accordance with the attached negotiating directives, three bilateral Framework
Agreements laying down the general terms and conditions for the participation of these
three candidate countries inallCommunityprogrammes whichare opened tothe CEECs.
6Proposalfora
COUNCIL DECISION
concerning the Community position withintheAssociation Councilonthe participation
of[country] inCommunity programmes
THE COUNCIL OFTHE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular
Articles 300(2) and 308 thereof,
Having regard tothe proposalfromthe Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The Additional Protocolto the Europe Agreement establishing an association between
the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and [country]♦♦♦♦,
of the other part, has been concluded by decision of the Council and the Commission
of4 December 1995 ;
(2) According to Article 1 of the Additional Protocol, [country]♦,m a yp a r t i c i p a t ei n
Community framework programmes, specific programmes, projects or other actions
and, pursuant to Article 2, the terms and conditions for the participation of [country]
in these activities shall be decided by the Association Council ;
(3) Community legal acts establishing the different Community programmes provide that
these programmes shall be open to the participation of candidate countries of Central
and Eastern Europe in accordance with the conditions set out in the Europe
Agreements, in their additional protocols and in the decisions of the respective
AssociationCouncils,
♦♦♦♦[This wording is applicable only to 6 CEECs: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania
and Slovakia. Aslightly differentwording(no reference to Additional Protocol) will be used for the 4
remainingCEECs].
7HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
The position to be taken bythe Communitywithin the Association Council established by the
Europe Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one
part, and [country] , ofthe other part, concerning the participation of [country] in Community
programmes, is the attached draft decisionofthe AssociationCouncil.
Done at Brussels,
For the Council
The President
8Proposalfora
FRAMEWORK DECISION N° …/…. OF THE ASSOCIATION COUNCIL
between the European CommunitiesandtheirMemberStates, ofthe onepart, and
[country] , ofthe otherpart
of...….…
adoptingthe generalterms and conditions forthe participation of [country] in
Community programmes
THE ASSOCIATION COUNCIL
Having regard to the Additional Protocol to the Europe Agreement between the European
Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and [country]♦♦♦♦,o ft h eo t h e rp a r t ,
concerning [country] ’s participation in Community programmes, and in particular Articles 1
a n d2th e r e of1;
Whereas :
(1) According to Article 1 of the Additional Protocol, [country]♦♦♦♦,m a yp a r t i c i p a t ei n
Community framework programmes, specific programmes, projects or other actions
dealing with a wide range of areas; whereas it also provides for addition of other
Communityareas;
(2) According to Article 2 of the Additional Protocol, the terms and conditions for the
participation of [country]♦♦♦♦, in these activities shall be decided by the Association
Council ;
(3) the specific participating conditions, including financial implications, in each
Community programme shall be determined on the basis of Memoranda of
Understanding to be negotiated and concluded between the European Commission and
theGovernmentof [country] ,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
♦♦♦♦[This wording is applicable only to 6 CEECs: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania
and Slovakia. Aslightly differentwording(no reference to Additional Protocol) will be used for the 4
remainingCEECs].
1OJ L…, 00.00.199.., p. …
9Article 1
[country] may participate in all Community programmes opened to participation of candidate
countriesofCentralandEasternEurope.
Article 2
[country] shall contribute financially to the European Union's budget corresponding to the
specific programmes in which [country] participate.
Article 3
[country]' s representatives shall be allowed to take part, as observers and for the points which
concern [country] , in the management committees responsible for monitoring the
programmes to which [country] will contribute financially.
Article 4
Projects and initiatives submitted by participants from [country] s h a l lb es u b j e c tt ot h es a m e
conditions, rules and procedures pertaining to the programmes concerned, as far as possible,
as are applied to Member States.
Article 5
Thespecifictermsandconditions, including financialcontribution, regarding the participation
of[country] in each particular programme will be determined between the European
Commission and the Government of [country] , on the basis of a Memorandum of
Understanding. Should [country] apply for Community external assistance pursuant to
Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 on economic aid to certain countries of Central and Eastern
Europe, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1266of21 June 1999, the specific terms and
conditions mentioned above may be determined on the basis ofa Financing Memorandum.
Article 6
This Framework Decision shall apply for an undetermined period. It may be denounced by
anyPartyinwriting withina 6-month notice.
10Article 7
This Framework Decision shall enter into force on the first day of the month following its
adoptionbythe AssociationCouncil.
Done at Brussels,
For the Association Council
The President
11Recommendation for a
COUNCIL DECISION
authorising the Commission to negotiatea frameworkagreement with Cyprus, Malta
and Turkey concerning theirparticipation inCommunity programmes
The Commission is authorised to negotiate with Cyprus,MaltaandTurkey, in accordance
with the attached negotiating directives, three bilateral framework agreements laying down
thegeneralprinciples fortheirparticipationinCommunityprogrammes.
The Commission shall conduct the negotiations on behalf of the Community in consultation
with a special committee appointed by the Council to assist it in this task, in accordance with
Article 300(1)ofthe Treatyofthe EuropeanCommunity.
12ANNEX
NEGOTIATING DIRECTIVES
1. General
The negotiations are for a framework agreement between the Community and,
respectively, Cyprus,MaltaandTurkeylaying down the general principles for their
participation inthe Communityprogrammes for whichthese countries apply.
Following the entry into force of each framework agreement and an application for
participation in a Community programme by one of these three countries, specific
participating conditions will subsequently be laid down in either Financing Memoranda (in
case of support by the relevant Community pre-accession funds) or ordinary Memoranda
of Understanding between the Commission and the Government of the candidate country
concerned.
2. Extent ofparticipation
Cyprus,MaltaandTurkeymust be able to participate in all Community programmes
which are opened to the ten candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe
(CEECs)2, the 13 candidates countries being treated on an equal footing as far as this kind
ofparticipation is concerned.
Conditions for submission, assessment and selection of applications from Cyprus,Malta
andTurkeywill be, as far as possible, subject (as for the CEECs) to the same conditions,
rules and procedures pertaining to the programmes concerned as are applied to Member
Statesofthe EuropeanUnion.
3. Financialprovisions
Cyprus,MaltaandTurkeywill pay each year a contribution to the programmes. This
contribution will be established in the Financing Memoranda or Memoranda of
Understanding mentioned above and will not be reimbursed to these candidate countries if,
at the end ofthe year, the results fall short ofthe contribution paid.
4. Involvement inthe Communitydecision-shaping
Representatives from Cyprus,MaltaandTurkeywill be invited to attend meetings of the
Programme Committees as observers, for the points whichconcernthem.
5. Duration
These three framework agreements will apply for an unspecified period, subject to a
classical clause of denunciation. Specific duration of participation in programmes will be
determined in the above-mentioned Memoranda.
2Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and
Slovenia.