ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEE DES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM (81)555
V ol.1981/9013

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement (CEE, Euratom) n°354/83 duConseil du1erfévrier 1983
concernant l'ouverture aupublic des archives historiques delaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergie atomique (JO L43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telque modifié parlerèglement (CE, Euratom) n°1700/2003 du22septembre 2003
(JO L243du27.9.2003, p.1),cedossier estouvert aupublic. Lecaséchéant, lesdocuments
classifiés présents dans cedossier ontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article 5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance with Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No354/83 of 1February 1983
concerning theopening tothepublic ofthehistorical archives oftheEuropean Economic
Community and theEuropean Atomic Energy Community (OJ L43, 15.2.1983, p.1),as
amended byRegulation (EC, Euratom) No1700/2003 of22September 2003 (OJ L243,
27.9.2003, p.1),this fileisopen tothepublic. Where necessary, classified documents inthis
filehave been declassified inconformity with Article 5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung (EWG, Euratom) Nr.354/83 des Rates vom 1.
Februar 1983 über die Freigabe der historischen Archive der Europäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI. L43vom 15.2.1983,
S.1),geändert durch dieVerordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr.1700/2003 vom 22.September 2003
(ABI. L243 vom 27.9.2003, S.1),istdiese Datei derÖffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit
erforderlich, wurden dieVerschlusssachen indieser Datei inÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel 5
dergenannten Verordnung freigegeben.

COM(81)555 final
Bruxelles ,le30th September 1981
COMMISSION
DES
COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES
Secrétariat général
COMMISSION REPORT OFTHE COUNCILβ»
ontheresults ofthecommercial policy decisions
takenin1977inthetextile sector
COM (81)555final

REPORT ONTHE RESULTS OPTHE COMMERCIAL POLICY DECISIONS TAKEN IN1977
IN THE TEXTILE SECTOR
CONTENTS
Introduction
I. 1.Summary ofcommercial policy objectives for textiLefflsnd clothing
products drawn upin1977
II.Trend oftrade intextile products
1.Trend ofimports into the Community^S ^"MFAproducts originating in
low-cost supplier countries
(a)Imports into the Community ofGroup Iproducts
(b)Other groups ofproducts
2.Trend ofimports country oforigin
3.Assessment irf^terms ofattainment ofobjectives
4.Use ofthe quotas by MFA suppliers
5.Trend ofthe European Community ^textile trade balance
6<£$Trend ofimports byMember State andassessment ofthefunctioning
ofburden-sharing
III.Functioning ofthebilateral agreements and arrangements
?
1.Analysis bygroup ofcountries covered by MFA agreements

(a)ASEAUcountries
(b)Indian Subcontinent (India ,Pakistan ,Sri Lanka andBangladesh )
(c)Latin America (Brazil ,Argentina ,Mexico ,Colombia ,Guatemala ,
Peru ,Haiti ,Uruguay )
<<
(d)State-trading countries (Romania ,Hungary ,Poland ,Bulgaria
andChina )
(e)Yugoslavia
(f)Korea ,Macao ,Hong Kong
£
 

III.2.Administration ofthe agreements
(a
0>
(c
(d
(e
(f
(gIntroduction ofnew limits -"basket extractor "mechanism
Allocation ofthe Community limits among the Member States
Origin frauds
Traditional and hand-made products
Outward processing traffic •
Inward processing traffic
Classification  8*
IV.3.Arrangements with preferential countries
Sensitivity trend oftheCommunis textile andclothing sector
between 1976 and 1980
1.Current situation ^
2.Product sensitivity
Conclusion 

ANNEXES
ANNEX I Statistical record ofimports in1980
for the eight categories ofGroup Iand
use ofthe global ceilings
ANNEX II
ANNEX III
ANNEX IV
ANNEX V
ANNEX VITrend ofimports into the Community (1976-1980 )
originating inthe main supplier countri&SV
inorder ofimportance in1980
Breakdown ofimports between textile and
clothing products forall third countries
Use ofthe 1980 quota&cwii der the bilateral
textile agreements ^?*
Problems involved inadministering the
agreements
Repoty ontheapplication ofArticle 6ofthe
fW^agreements (basket extractor )

REPORT ONTHE RESULTS OPTHE COMMERCIAL
POLICY DECISIONS TAKEN IN1977 INTHE
TEXTILE SECTOR
Introduction
On13July 1981 theCouncil adopted itstimetable ofwork fortherenewaT
oftheMFA .Itagreed tospell outingood time ,onthebasis ofaproposal
from theCommission -prior toanybilateral negotiations andimpossible by
theendofOctober -detailed commercial policy objectives ^giotably inthe
light ofcertain economic objectives andfollowing anejraluation ofthe
results ofthecommercial policy decisions taken in1977 *
C#
This report from theCommission totheCoun<%£ 18being presented with a
view tothat evaluation .TheCommissioBf^rould point outthat ithasalready
sent theCouncil areport -July 1980 ,subsequently updated -ontwoyears *
operation oftheMultifibre Arrangement (COM(8O)438 final ).
Thepresent report covej^three years 1operation oftheMFA .Itcontains a
summary oftheobjectives laid down bytheCouncil in1977 »adetailed
examination oftextile trade trends bysupplier country andbyproduct ,an
assessment of^ihe operation ofthebilateral agreements andanumber of
observations onthetrend ofthesituation inthetextile sector since 1976 ,
notably with regard tothelevel ofsensitivity ofthevarious products .
^Inorder toensure theorderly growth oftrade andtogive Community industry
anadequate period ofadjustment ,theCommunity 'spolicy ,onimports oftextile
products with ahigh rate ofmarket penetration consisted insetting interned
global import ceilings foralllow-cost countries atlevels designed tomake
sure that themarket wasnotdisrupted under thecumulative weight ofimports .

These global ceilings ,which were determined ,foreach category ofproduct ,were
based onfactors such astheestimated trend ofconsumption andacceptable
growth oftherate ofimport penetration .
Forimports ofproducts inother groups
-though regarded asless sensitive -theCommunity setmaximum annual growkK ^
rates ranging from4$to8$.These rates were calculated toallow the ^XjjHmunity
tooffer anoverall growth rate forallimports ofaround 6f0.Theapproach thus
adopted bytheCommunity provided third countries withtheopportunity to
increase their exports oflesssensitive products inGroups^^toVordiversify
into those products .
Λ
Trend oftrade intextile products
Thecommercial policy decisions taken i$$L977 wereconcerned exclusively with
imports originating inlow-cost countries .Inorder toallow the fullest
possible comparative analysis ,data forimports from allnon-member countries
aregiveninthestatistic^jj^nnexes tothisreport .
1.Trend ofimports into the Community ofMFA products originating inlov;-cost
supplier countries
Totalimj^i&s ofMFAproducts originating inlow-cost supplier countries grew
byanannual average of2.7% (involume terms )between 1976 ,thereference
year fordetermining quantitative targets ,andI98O .Under thefirst MFA
^5^(1974 to1977)i theaverage annual increase wasaround 25$.Theresult of
thetextile policy implemented in1977 wasnotonly tochange thetendency ofimport
growth recorded under the first MFAbut also tokeep thetrend forallimports
(1)from low-cost countries within the set levels .
(1)When assessing theeconomic impact ofthedevelopment ofimports compared with
the1976 Level ,itshould beborn inmind that thebase levels were relatively high
ascompared totheaverage trend ,mainly because ofshort-term economic factors
(theyear 1976 was apeak year inthetextile cycle ).Some statistics have since
been identified more precisely .

Total imports from outside the Community (including imports from the
industrialized countries )increased "byanaverage annual 4*5$ involume
terms from 1976 to1980 .
Trend ofimports from 1976 to1980 forall MFA products
Imports into the EEC 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
Reference Year
EXTRA EEC 1-448 925 1332784 1425722 lj&97 247 1739848
S^SxS^OLICY 1092 817 1001437 1072^6 1224923 1214756
/ 
II.1.(a)Imports into the Community ofGroup Iproducts
Total imports ofGroup I^moducts originating inlow-cost supplier countries
grew "byanannual average of0.25$ from 1976 to1980 .Asthe Community 's
^ objective wastolimit growth inimports ofthese products toanannual average
of1-2$,it^tdear that sofarthetarget has "been reached .Inthesame
period ,q«^all imports fromoutside theCommunity rosebyanannual average
of1.1$oï>y volume .
t<Sv'The Community 'sobjectives with regard tothese products were determinedr
originating inlow-cost supplier countries have moved (more detailed statistics
aregiven inAnnex I).category bycategory .The following analysis shows bycategory how imports

t
Howtargets andperformance compare forthe1976-80 period :
Group Icategories
CategoryAverage annual growth rate
for low-cost importsLow-cost penetration raJtoe
0^
Projected
Growth 1977Actual growth
1976 -19801976
1:Cotton yarn
2:Cotton fabrics
3:Synthetic fabrics
4:T-shirts
5:Jerseys
6:Trousers
7:Blouses
8jShirts+0.6$ -0.35$ 23-1# - 26.lio
+0.5$
+3.6$-2.8$
-2.6$ <$L7.4$30.7$
14.8$
+.3.8$ +3.5/0 25.6$ 34.8$
+4.1# -2.25Uy24.5 /0 15.6$
+3.4/0
+1.5$26Ai
48.2$32.1$
47.9/0
+I.5/0 +3.2$ 59.2/0 57.5/0
é
S
Imports oftextile products (categories 1to3)were down inI98O bycomparison
with 1976 .Forthese categories ,theobjective ofstabilizing growth was
attained .Itshould benoted that theglobal ceilings laid down for1978 ,1979
and1980 were insome cases substantially underused .Notwithstanding the
stabilization ofimport growth ,penetration rates rose forcategories 1and2
onaccount oftheshrinking oftheCommunity market .Forclothing (categories
4to8),thesituation varies according totheproduct .
••/••

Inthecase ofT-shirts (category 4)andjerseys (category 5),growth was
stabilized .Theglobal ceilings laid down for1978 ,1979 and1980 were
under-used .Therate ofpenetration forcategory 5declined appreciably .
Inthecaseoftrousers (category 6),blouses (category 7)andshirts (c^Sgory
8),thesituation issomewhat different .Insome cases thegrowth rates' for
these articles substantially exceeded the 1977 forecasts .However ,the
Λ
Community global ceilings laiddownfor1978,1979and1980^«$te notbreached
andpenetration rates wereheldat1976levels ,except in^S^e caseoftrousers .
Il.l.(b ) Other croups ofproducts ^
Overall 1import growth forproducts in^jjpups IItoVdidnotexceed the
rates forecast in1977 .Thefollowing table gives thedetails bygroup .
Targets andperformance comj^Sfced byproduce groupforthe1976-80 period
Low-cost imports
'000 tonnes
Group I 645*5
Group ]jt 195*9
Group III
4^"Group IV
vCx Group V195.9
146.4
63.8
41.3Growth rate
1980Projected
1977Actual
I976-8O
653.2 1-2 % +0.25$
230.2 4-5$ +4.2$
204.7 6-8/0 +8.8$
80.1 6-8/o +6»ofo
46.4 nospecific
target set+2.9$

Although the trend forallthe groups taken together iswithin the 1977
forecasts ,thesituation varies according tothe category ofproduct .
There isamore detailed analysis ofthis trend insection II.4.ofthis
report .
Trend ofimports bycountry oforigin
Forty supplier countries account forover SCffoofextra^JJC imports (Annex II),
Forall MFA products taken together ,the USA was the 'EEC'slargest supplier
in1976 .This has remained so,andthe USA'srelative share infact went
onincreasing into 1980 .
The second largest supplier isHong Kong ,butitsrelative share fell inI98O
compared with 1976 •Even inabsolute quantity terms ,imports from Hong Kong
fell byanaverage 3.2%p.a^s^ver that period .Imports from anumber of
other third countries recorded adownward trend ,notably India ,Turkey ,
Yugoslavia ,Romanía ,Singapore ,Malaysia ,Colombia and México .
Theimports^&iginating inother supplier countries haveincreased .Among the
Communities major suppliers ,Korea hasincreased itsrelative share and
Portugal has also stepped upits exports considerably despite adrop in1980 .
The countries which have recorded the largest percentage increases intheir
V exports tothe Community aregenerally the medium-sized orsmall suppliers ,
such asChina ,Tunisia ,Egypt ,the Philippines ,Indonesia ,Sri Lanka and
Cyprus .

For Group I,the USAisstill the largest supplier ,followed very closely
byHong Kong .Forthese highly sensitive products ,thefall recorded by
Hong Kong wasparticularly pronounced between 1976 and 1980 ,the same being
true ofTurkey ,India ,Yugoslavia andTaiwan .Imports from Korea stabilize ^
while those from Brazil ,Pakistan and Spain recorded thegreatest incraa&ss .
Adistinction has tobedrawn between exporters oftextile products and
exporters ofclothing .In1980,thetenlargest suppliers i^Cfeach case were
asfollows s
Textiles Clothing
1.USA
2.Greece
3.Austria
4.Switzerland
5.Turkey
6.India
7•Brazil
8.Port
9.Spain
10.China
νsTonnes Tonnes
219.979 ^1.Hong Kong 101.378
75.852 2.Korea 47.800
6^09
v<&8.3783.
4.Greece
Taiwan29.744
24.434
Λ
60.729 5.USA 22.672
56.954 6.Romania 20.994
56.858 7.Yugoslavia 19.813
54.772 8.Tunisia I9.707
53.789 9.Portugal 18.687
46.594 10.India I7.493
The USAtherefore remains ourlargest supplier oftextile products .Our
imports ofclothing come mainly from Hong Kong andtoalesser extent from
South Korea .The breakdown ofimports between textiles andclothing forall
third countries isgiven inAnnex III.

Assessment interms ofattainment ofobjectives
Overall ,theresults obtained areinline with the objectives setin1977'
Asregards the growth trend ofimports from all low-cost supplier countries ,
theobjective ofdifferentiating between supplier countries hasalso beer*^
achieved ,for imports from the major suppliers have been stabilized .
Imports from Hong Kong andTaiwan ofGroup Iproducts infac"W$tell .Imports
from Korea remained atthe 1976 levels .
ι
Incontrast ,alarge number ofnew orsmall-scale suppliers were able to
increase their exports tothe Community ,inscfoe cases substantially .The
main countries involved here areTunisia ,ojgypt ,the Philippines ,Bulgaria ,
Indonesia and Cyprus .
Use ofthe quotas by MFA grEppliers
Thetables inAnnex IVgive details ofimports bysupplier country for 197o »
1979 a*1'*1980 for each category forwhich quotas were set.The amounts of
thequotas agreed with thepartner countries areindicated for 1980 .A
precise <gOTiparison between access possibilities andtheir use bythesupplier
countries has been drawn uponthebasis ofthe import licenses issued for 1980 .
'Ananalysis ofthese tables shows that asageneral rule the quotas arrived at
with the supplier countries were kept tobythem .-Where the quotas were
exceeded ,this isduetoimplementation oftheflexibility provisions orto
individual increases granted bythe Community .

II.5. Trend ofthe European Community 'stextile trade balance
Fortextiles /clothing taken together ,the Community 'strade balance with
third countries istraditionally indeficit .This derives essentially from
the trade with the low-cost countries .With the industrialized countries , *
«£#the Community has always had asurplus ,even ifthis surplus has fallenrSyOm
year toyear .In1979 thebalance with the USA became negative ,asdidthe
balance with Japan in1980 .Forthese two countries ,thedeficit comes from
thetextile sector proper ,thetrade inclothing still show^js ^surplus in
favour ofthe Community .
For clothing ,the Community balance with allthird countries has been negative
since the1960,s,fortextiles /clothing tog^^r theCommunity balance has
been negative since 1975 »while fortext^Ses the balance wasstill positive in
1980 .
Trend ofthe EC'strade balafl&g inproducts#
1977 1980
Extrar-ECTextiles
Clothing
Total+1099 158
-2227 797
-1128 639+ 351 881
-4027 052
-3675 171
Low-Cost
^CountriesTextiles
Clothing
Total+ .199 155
-3004 718
-2805 563- 181 121
-4673 155
-4492 034
Indus trialized
CountriesTextiles
Clothing
Total+ 900 003
+ 776 921
+1676 924+ 533 002
+ 646 103
+1179 105

11.6 . Trend ofimports byMember State and assessment ofthe functioning ;of
burden-sharing
Imports oftextile andclothing products aredivided upamong the Member'
States onadifferentiated basis depending onthesize ofthe market ,the
importance ofthis trade ,consumption habits andthecompetitiveness oftheX&
textile and clothing sector . .
In1974 the Community developed aburden-sharing formula that wasintended
toleadprogressively toanequitable allocation amongtheMg^er States of
k imports fromlow-cost supplier countries .This harmoni z^^on ofimport levels
Wisnecessary toachieve acommon market .Thesituation inthe Community
continues ,however ,todiffer from region toregion asregards import flows
andproduction levels fortextile andclothinrf^products . 
V,Thetable below gives anidea ofhow^heburden-sharing formula works by
comparing actual andtheoretical *import shares .
Trade ofimports byMembey<^tate 1976-80
Year V D Ρ I ML UK IRL DK
Low-Cost I976 376 265 132 091 136 896 161 I84 235 906 8810 41665
Countries A 1977 361 787 119 998 118 815 I53 820 203 890 8817 34310
I978 386 012 121 461 123 516 159 431 237 741 8695 35390
I979 524 730 151 971 159 501 171 402 263 606 10411 42302
I98O 443 023 163 246 153 113l8l 768 222 84O 8519 42247
Theoretical
Share28.5 18.5 15 10.5 23.5 1 3
Actual
ShareI976 34.4 12.1 12.5 12.5 I4.7 0.8 3.8
I98O 36.5 13.4 12.6 I5.0 18.3 0.7 3.5
*The'-theoretical share "ofeach Member State isone aspect ofthe burden -
sharing formula ,andiscalculated onthebasis ofobjective data (GENP,
external trade ,population ).

The analysis shows that theresults are not generally speaking inline with
the objectives .
The Member States 1approach totheir theoretical import shares has not always
been asanticipated .Certain Member States continue toimport more than their
&theoretical shares while others import less .
Functioning ofthebilateral agreements and ,arrangements ^
1.Analysis bygroup ofcountries covered by MPA agreements'
(a)ASSAÏÏ countries
In1976 "theshare ofthe ASEAN countries inthe Community 'sextra-EC imports
was 3.5/o*In1980 ,that share was more orles^the same (3.6^).
Itisinrespect ofthese countries thsi^the Community has set the largest Itisinrespect ofthese countries t^>"the Community hassetthelargest
number ofnewlimits ;37»ofwhich 8areatCommunity level .These requests
were mainly aimed atthe Philippines and Thailand .The application ofthe
agreement with Indonesia haiK'given rise todifficulties ,notably asregards
theapplication oftheu^pasket-extractor "mechanism .Limits have hadtobe
introduced bythe Community inrespect ofIndonesia without that country 's
agreement .Indonesia also requested the amendment ofcertain provisions of
the agreemee*' .
Use ofthe export possibilities agreed onvaries greatly from one category
and from one country toanother .Forthe Philippines and Thailand ,the levelV 
ofuseisgenerally high andthe two countries have been able toincrease
their exports steadily compared with 1976 ,thereference year fortheestablish­
ment ofthe limits .Imports originating inSingapore and Malaysia have fallen
compared with 1976 (4«5/&and -9%respectively ).These twocountries only use
their export possibilities tocertain regions ofthe Community .Inorder to

ensure ahigher percentage rate ofuseoftheCommunity quotas ,they have
requested ,transfers between regional quota shares onanumber ofoccasions .
Indonesia hasincreased itsexports considerably since 1976 .This has
created problems fortheCommunity since these exports have been concentra -
onGroup Icategories ,namely trousers ,blouses andshirts .
Asregards thecampaign against the fraudulent diversion oftrade ,the
ASEAN countries haveproved cooperative andhaveaccepted tl^y-'extension
ofthedouble-checking system tocategories notcovered^^^any limits .
(b)Indian Subcontinent (India ,Pakistan ,SriLanka andBangladesh )
#
AtCommunity level ,allthequotas agreed ,^&th these countries have been
respected ;there havebeensomeindiv^^al cases ofquotas being exceeded
atregional level due inpart toadministrative andmonitoring difficulties
however ,this also shows that the allocation oftheCommunity limits among
the Member States bears litftae relation tothe structure ofdemand .
Anumber ofnew limits have been introduced via the basket-extractor
mechanism (India 11regional limits ,Pakistan 7regional limits ,SriLanka
1regional if&it ).
India retained itsposition astheCommunity 'sthird highest MFAsupplier
during theperiod ofvalidity ofitsbilateral agreement .AtCommunity
V
level ,however ,India hasused itsquotas very unevenly anditsrate ofuse
ofitsquota forcotton yarn hasnever reached 25$ .

Certain cases ofexport /import accounting differences have proved difficult
toresolve .Theinterpretation ofthelist ofIndian items (folklore products
free from quotas )hasalso given rise todifficulties incertain cases .
Pakistan isoneofthe Community 'ssuppliers making the "best useoftheir^ -
quotas jthese were fixed onthebasis ofimports for 1976 ,which was a
particularly poor year for Pakistan 'sindustry because ofpolitical and
social crises inthecountry .Because ofitsvery high rate <sS>use ,Pakistan
hasinsisted onamorepositive Community response toits^saequests fortransfers
between thequota shares oftheMember States andhasSteady called for
marked increases in1982 incertain Community limits .
SriLanka'suseofthefive Community quo^*& agreed hasbeenvery uneven ,
varying in1980 from 17%forT-shirts forshirts .Sri Lanka hasnot
increased its exports ofother products toany extent .
Theagreement with Bangladeshi (aflexible onewithout quotas )hasnot
given risetotheintrxflf^ction ofanyquantitative limit .
(c)Latin America (Brazil ,Argentina ,Mexico ,Colombia ,Guatemala ,Perù ,
Haiti Xftfaguay )
The overall share ofthe above countries inextra-EC imports declined slightly
between 1976 and 1980 (from 6.1$ to5*9f°)*Only Brazil counts asoneofthe
^^'Community 'smajor suppliers -with 60000tin1980.
The Latin-American countries mainly export textile products ,yarns andfabrics
and woollen products ,inparticular worsteds .

Ingeneral ,administration ofthe agreements has not given rise toany
problems .Thelevel ofuse ofthe agreed limits isgenerally high and double
checking has generally been effective .The only source ofdifficulties has
been the rigid allocation ofthe Community limits between the Member States and
the application ofthe basket-extractor clause .
Ten new limits have been negotiated ,two atCommunity level .Ithas proved
impossible toresolve twocases byconsultations ,thefirst (with Brazil )
resulted inaunilateral measure being adopted bytheCommu^t^asprovided
for inthe agreements with that country .
(d)State-trading countries (Romania ,Hungary ,Poland ,Bulgaria andChina )
Thestate-trading countries' share ofextrtfpEC imports has remained stable .
In1980thatshare amounted to11.7/5^jjJipared with11.4$ in1976.
Under these agreements ,the Community hasset 36regional limits pursuant
tothebasket-extractor pr^Jj^sions .Thebreakdown oftheselimits isas
follows :Bulgaria 3,fs^wigary 5»Romania 9tPoland 3andChina 16.To
explain the larger number oflimits set for China ,itshould bestressed that
the provisions applying toChina arestricter .
Thepeigehtage rate ofuseoftheagreed quotas isgenerally high ,particularly
for Hungary ,Romania and above all China .Togive anindication ,average
rates ofusewithin Group Iare asfollows :Bulgaria 47$ »Poland 50fo,
Hungary 5&%,Romania 70/5,andChina approximately 80%.Thespectacular
entrance ofChina onto the Community market since the implementation ofthe
agreement in1979 should bestressedj this has given rise toanincrease in
Chinese exports from 40*7 "tin1979 "to58.9 "tin1980 .

(e)Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia 'srelative share ofextra-EC imports fell from 2,1% in1976 to
2.1/Sin1980 .For Group I,therate ofuseofthequantitative limits is
approximately 50tfo.Ithasproved possible toestablish certain export limits ^
without theCommunity having formal recourse tothebasket-extractor cl^jk&e
inthe agreement .
Importations under outward processing arrangements (OPT )
Attention should bedrawn tothe OPTaspect with regartfpto thestate-trading
countries .Under the agreements with these countries ,OPT imports are not
subject tothequantitative limits oftheagreements provided they are
declared assuch under theadministrative ^bjiitoring systems inforce tothis
end inthe Community regions .
Consequently ,certain Member States inwhich such systems donot exist count
these imports against the crfiSkktitative limits ,while inother Member States
they are excluded from ijiose limits but aresubject tothe autonomous import
arrangements established from year toyear .
(f)Korea ,.yfccao ,Hong ;Kon/?
In19o&lCorea wasthe Community 'snumber two low-cost supplier with 84000t,
representing 4«8$ ofextra-EC imports .Korean imports amount totwo-thirds
vofthelevel ofimports from Hong Kong (127 000t).
Since 1976 ,Korea hasincreased itsexports byanaverage of6.4% peryear .
This high average isduetotheincrease between 1976 and 1977 »which wasof
theorder of2Cffo »

The percentage rate ofuse ofthe Group Iquotas isfairly high .Itvaries
forthe products inthe other groups .The major problem that has arisen in
thelast three years isthat offraud .Certain partial solutions have been
found but they arestill not sufficient .
Macao occupies twentieth place among the Community 'slowcost suppliers with&
18000tin1980 ,representing 1%ofextrar-EC imports .This share ,ofes^«ar -
ECimports isvery slightly down onthe 1976 level .1980 isthefirst year in
which Macao waspermitted toexport inexcess ofits 1976 level (+1000t).
Macao does notexport textiles (cat.1,2and 3)butmak^l^very good useof
the other Group Iquotas .Therate ofuse ofthe quotas forthe other groups
ishigh with particular pressure onthe French and United Kingdom markets .
Theagreement comprises 25limits ofwhich 15^itre Community ones.
Administration ofthese limits hasbeen s'^isfactory .
Hong Kong isbyfar the largest ofthe Community 'slow-cost suppliers with
127000tin1980representi ^,7*3^ofextra-EC imports .
Although Hong Kong re&ptded aregular increase inits exports between 1977
and 1979 "the 1980 level isdown by17000tonthe 1976 level .
Theperc^ffcage rate ofuseofthequotas hasbeenfairly high overthe
lasttl^ree years ,except inI98Oforcertain non-Group Iproducts .
xXItshould benoted that Hong Kong makes full use ofthe scope forflexibility
offered bythe agreement inthe management ofthe quotas .
There were certain fraud problems in1980 butthese were resolved satisfactorily .
The most recent problems tohave arisen relate totheclassification ofproducts
asaresult ofthe production byHong Kong ofnew articles .

III.2. Administration ofthe agreements
Generally speaking ,thesupplier countries have managed the quotas correctly
inaccordance with the double-checking rules .Where the arrangements
allowing flexibility intheuseofquotas (carryover ,advance usecarry forward ,
transfers between categories )havebeenapplied ,thishasbeen ,notified t<*$
Community inadvance andapplication has been inaccordance with theb^&tteral
agreements .
Anumber ofproblems arose ,however ,with regard toexport Jjjfcences and
certificates oforigin (see Annex V).
(a)Introduction ofnewlimits -"basket extractor "mechanism
c#
Under the "basket extractor "mechanism arjjSigements inthebilateral agreements ,<#
between 1January 1978 and31August^tcl151newlimits were introduced ,
including 21atCommunity level (see Annex VI).Thegreat majority of
thecategories concerned are^outside Group I(mostsensitive products ).
Thethirdcountries conce^^.include China (l6),Philippines (15)»India (ll),
Macao (10)andThailaxS^9 )«Generally speaking ,thelimits weredetermined
inagreement with the partner country .Efforts toreach agreement inrespect
1 ofcertain categories failed following consultations withBrazil ,Mexico ,
India and^(lonesia .
Anumber ofthird countries complained ofthe high number ofnew limits
requested bythe Community .They also considered that where the requests
were accompanied bycalls for immediate suspension ofexports ,this was
likely todisturb trade .
(b)Allocation ofthe Comnrunit.y limits anions the Member States
Under thebilateral agreements ,the Community negotiated Community quotas for
the most part .Inorder toensure balanced burden-sharing andalso for
••/••

for administrative reasons ,the Community shared outthe Community limits
among the Member States .Details ofthe share-out were given tothe
supplier countries which are able ,under thebilateral agreements ,to
request transfers between the Member States *shares .
Many requests were made fortransfers ,but the Community was unable to
agree all ofthem .Anumber ofsupplier countries expressed concern about
this ,pointing outthattheallocation oftheCommunity lim^jy among the
Member States prevented them from making fulluseoftha^iantities setfor
the Community ,added towhich there was adanger that the Community market
would becompartmentized . 
(c)Origin frauds
Although the agreements contain specific provisions onorigin checks -which
have generally proved effective -frauds inconnection with theorigin of
exported goods persist and^fcSure even become aworrying phenomenon .With a
view tocombating it,tale Community has taken measures tostrengthen internal
customs cooperation between the Member States .
With regard^%to external action ,agreement wasreached following talks with
Hong K^g andSouth Korea ,forexample ,oncertain arrangements forcharging
against their quotas quantities originating inthose countries and imported
fraudulently into the Community via theASEAU countries .Inaddition ,the
Community reached agreement with the ASEAN countries onextending the double -
checking system tocertain categories ofproducts notsubject tolimits in
order toprevent fraud .This cooperation with the ASEAN countries 1authorities
has produced satisfactory results .

(d)Traditional andhand-made products
Article 12(3 )and (4)oftheMFAprovides forcottage industry andhand-made
products tobeexcluded from quantitative limitation ,provided such products
arecovered bycertificates issued under arrangements established between
theimporting andexporting countries .TheCommunity concluded protocol^^
tothiseffect tothebilateral agreements . ^
Identification ofsuchproducts hasgivenrise ,however ,tod^NpS'iculties and
disagreements between theCommunity andthethird countriiS^concerned (see
Annex VJ.
Itisdifficult msome cases toasses the ovgqtall impact ofthese protocols
andtoquantify thetrend ofimports ofppooUcts excluded from thescope of
thequantitative limits .Only four Mgsyer States regularly return data
concerning these products .
(e)Outward processing :t^a^fic (OPT)
Certain agreements (Eastern trading area andYugoslavia )provide forgoods
exported under outward processing arrangements tobeexcluded from the agreed
limits .MosV&f theagreements ,however ,make nospecific reference tosuch
arrangem^wfe andgoods exported under them arenormally covered bythelimits ,
providea that theprocessing inthethird country confers third country origin
onthere-imported products .
V
 
ForEastern trading area countries ,goods imported under theoutward processing
arrangement areadministered autonomously onthebasis ofthenational
arrangements .With regard toGroup Iproducts ,since 1980 there hasbeen a
Community regulation laying down quantitative limits bycategory andby
Member State .There arealso limits expressed invalue terms forother products
grouped incategories different from those oftheMFA .
•■/••

Because ofthe lack ofcommon arrangements ,the Community has been unable to
make amethodical distinction between outward processing flows and other imports .
(f)Inward processing traffic (TPT )
Thebilateral agreements stipulate that goods re-exported from the Comirarity
shall not becharged against the agreed limits andthat the Community shall
provide thepartner countries with regular information onthe^iantities of
products re-exported .Thisinformation hasbeenunavailab^&5wing toaccounting
difficulties inoneMember State (United Kingdom ). .^3^
(g)Classification
Thesystem established bytheCommunit^ferovides forproducts tobe
classified onthe basis ofthe Common Customs Tariff and the Nimexe .Each
Nimexe heading isallocated toacategory andthe quantitative limits are
negotiated bycategory .
The experience gained onthe Community side after three years ofoperation ,
atboth theofficial andbusiness levels ,has shown that although thetariff
classification system setuphasproved satisfactory onthewhole ,ithasnot
resolv^sall theproblems andhasfailed toavoid delays -which canbe
substantial -onimportation .
Some third countries have been surprised toencounter discrepancies in
classification between Member States .Efforts toharmonize customs practices
inthe Member States should bestepped upintheNomenclature Committee (see
Annex V).

The Council decisions ofDecember 1977 were adjusted inDecember 1978 "toembrace
the Mediterranean countries linked with the Community bypreferential
agreements .^"Thepreferential countries' share oftotal imports originating
inthird countries wasmaintained ataround 1yjobetween 1976 and 1980 .
Thetwocountries which haveapplied foraccession totheCommunity (Po^agal
andSpain )account forover 5Ofoofimports from thepreferential countries
group .They actually increased their share between 1976 and 1980 .
&
Asaresult oftheinformal voluntary restraint arrangei^pts concluded with
allthe countries concerned except Turkey ,imports originating inthis group
ofcountries were kept ,generally speaking ,within the quota shares ofthe
internal global ceilings allocated tothese<^tuitries ,atboththeCommunity
andtheregional levels .Inthecase o&Jpktegory 1(cotton yarn),however ,
the quota shares forcertain regions wfere exceeded in1979 *
Although total imports from^Qsuese countries were kept within thelevels set
bytheCouncil ,anumbeE^f adjustments affecting specific suppliers were<#
made inorder tomeetXhe requirements offlexible management .The adjustments
were made ,with the Council 'sagreement ,without calling into question the
levels setijf^December 1978.
The arrangements with some countries (Spain ,Tunisia ,Cyprus )expired atthe
endof1980 andthenegotiations required toprolong them until the endof
1981 proved arduous .Thenegotiations entailed anumber oflimited increases
for 1981 inthelevels proposed bythe Council in1978 andtheabolition of
limits forcertain other categories ,notably with regard toSpain ,which
recorded avery lowrate ofuse ofthe voluntary restraint levels .
1.Portugal ,Spain ,Greece ,Turkey ,Malta ,Egypt (forcertain products ),
Morocco ,Tunisia ,Cyprus .

Under allthe voluntary restraint arrangements there asmachinery for
administrative cooperation andconsultation .This machinery made itpossible to
overcome specific difficulties affecting given products orCommunity regions
without resorting inevery case tomore formal voluntary restraint measures .
Noagreement was reached with Turkey ,with theresult that in1978 and 1979
safeguard measures weretaken torestrict exports ofcotton yam fromTuri^y'
tooneregion oftheCommunity .TheCommission iscontinuing itseffo£ §^
toreach anamicable solution with this country .
Itshould benoted thatallthearrangements expire atth^$nd of1981.As
renewing themisexpected toprove difficult ,theComn^^ion hasalready
made proposals for anew approach with regard toimports from the countries
concerned (COM(8l)53 final ). .
SENSITIVITY TREND OF THE COTMUNTTY TEXTILE AND CLOTHING SECTOR BETWEEN
1976 AND 1980
1.Current Situation <^<5^
InJuly 1981 the Commission sent the Council acommunication onthesituation
andprospects ofthetextile andclothing industries inthe Community (COM(8l)388
final ).Soa^bf thepoints made inthat document mayusefully bereproduced
here .
Thetextile and clothing industries still occupy animportant place inthe
yindustrial life ofthe Community .In1980 they employed over 2300 000people ,
i.e. nearly lOfoofthemanufacturing work force .They accounted for 6foof
value added inmanufacturing andprovided 5$ofCommunity exports of
manufactures .

Since 1973 thetextile and .clothing industry has experienced economic
difficulties and has been forced torestructure .Inthe period since then it
has shed over 800 000 jobs attherate of115 000 ayear onaverage . .Between
1973 and 1979 ,15*1 i°oftextile firms and14.8$ ofclothing firms were obliged
toclose down .
../
Community production went through three very marked cycles between 1973^nd
I98O ,which makes itdifficult toextrapolate atrend from recent years .
Examination ofproduction figures fortheperiod since 19^£Bhows ,however ,
that production inthetextile and clothing industry whole has atbest
been stagnant .
Leaving aside theimpact oftrade flows ,t^Sfcey factors foremployment are
thetrend ofconsumption ontheinterna^^arket andmodernization of
production .The Community 'sstrategy ofgiving the industry arespite by
limiting the growth ofimports was atleast partly nullified byasharp
recession onthe Community jtf^rket ,which forced asubstantial number of
less competitive firms wr ofbusiness .
Joblosses were highest in1974 and .1975 »"but 1980 wastheworst year since
then.Thii^jsost beduetothefactthattheeffects ofthegeneral recession
were hejfc£$^ened inthatyear.
ν'2.Product sensitivity
Atcategory level ,the current economic difficulties have brought certain
changes inthesensitivity ofproducts .These changes have been magnified
bythe trend oflow-cost imports ofcertain products .

Themost significant changes since 1977 areshown mthe following table ,
which gives thetrend ,ofpenetration rates forallthemost sensitive products
from 1977 to1980 .
AlloriginsLow–cost EECproduc –
Imports *tion ('000 t)
1977 1978 1979 1979 197950
1.Cotton yarn
2.Cotton fabrics
3.Synthetic fabrics
4.T-shirts
5.Jerseys
6.Trousers
7.Blouses
8.Shirts
9«Terry fabrics
12.Socks
13*Briefs
14.Men'scoats
15.Women 'scoats
16.Men'ssuits
17.Men'sjackets
19.Handkerchiefs
20.Bed linen
21.Anoraks
22.Synthetic yarn
ex22.Acrylic yarn
24*Men'sknitted orcrochetA^jrpy jamas
25.WomQjj^knitted orcroj&ieted pyjamas
26.Dresses
27.Skirts
29.Women 'ssuits20
35
25
33
19
38
36
59
26
17
24
29
20
NA
35
^4°
k18
59
6
NA
29
26
21
14
NA
36
34
20
1
17
2630.A&BWomen 's
woven pyjamas
31.Brassieres
ex32.Woven pile fabrics
68.Babies' knitted or
crocheted undergarments
73oTrack suits
76.Industrial and
occupational clothing
*excluding imports originating in24
37
26.
33
15
38
53
57
28
17
^3
25
33
42
17
66
6
NA
30
16
18
15
19
33
•35
33
2
25
27
Greece .29
40
25
35
17
40
49
60
29
25
29
27
30
35
47
18
65
6
17
40
19
23
16
27
41
39
37
5
31
3056
23
24
20
24
23
27
28
27
12
61
3
14
39
16
19
13
25
38
30
12
4
29
2621 653
30 453
14 270
32S*3913xV 235653#453x
113
23
29
54
41
42
13
54
26
14
3
133
8
799
85
8
15
77
43
13
7
6
86
19
14
48

«
Inmost cases thepenetration rates increased between 1977 and -1979 *However ,
this increase was progressive andingeneral wasfairly modest .Inthe
absence ofproduction data ,itisnot possible forthe moment toassess the
trend in1980.Overall ,thefigures confirm thepresent composition ofthes^
groups ,established onthebasis ofthe low-cost penetration rates *. {W*

For anumber ofproduct categories ,there isamore pronounced increase
inthepenetration rates .This applies tocategories 12,15,1.6,19,21,
24,29and 73.
cSForcertain ofthese categories ,theincrease inlow-cost imports was
particularly pronounced intheperiod 1977 to1980 .
 Category Unit 1976 1977 1978 1979 v<>> 1980
■<3v –
12 1000 pairs 190697 160412 170979 2W$188 197309
15 1000 pieces 17169 14918 17056 18651 16795
16 n .. 8103 6767 6496 7692 6952
19 " " n.d.238793Æ 410 207781 224743
21 » " n.d.308],^ 38940 40674 42150
24 " " 6286 8234 9561 14526 17O65
29 " " 3078 2780 2449 3965 4120
73 " " 3^fe 4428 5767 8277 11511I «/AX*-' - « « . IwI ~–Il ––# –
If,mo^Iver ,thesituation oftheindustry andinparticular thetrend of
production istaken into consideration ,itcanheconcluded that categories
12,21and 73are nowjust assensitive astheproducts inGroup I.
Thedegree ofsensitivity ofcertain other categories hasdiminished since
1976 .This isthecase forcategories 3and 5,where there has "been areduction
intherate ofpenetration and afall inlovj-cost imports .

Category Ufoit 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
3 tonnes 39975 41732 42571 44367 37947
5 1000 pieces 174 836 156 119 12786l 140 823 161 923
Conclusion
After three years ofapplication ofthe policy decided onin1977 the
essential commercial policy objectives canTM^onsidered tohave "been
achieved .Also ,the provisions adopted the implementation ofthat
policy canheregarded ashaving provS^effective .Certain administrative
difficulties within the Community andwith the supplier countries have "been
noted .These could beremed^d without thegeneral structure oftheCommunity 's
import arrangements bein^j^und anientallychanged inthefuture .
Although theresults obtained inthe sphere ofcommercial policy areinline
with the objectives pursued ,the need for adjustment inthe Community textile
and clotbOTg industry onthebasis ofacommon industrial policy must again
beatAted .
xN*Asitpointed outin1977 1the Commission considers that theresults that
V
k
could beachieved onthe external policy level would fail tomeet the
objective ofmaintaining aviable textile andclothing industry inthe Community
unless they formed part ofanindustrial policy that enabled the Community
industry torecover its competitiveness .

ATÏÏTrX I
I
1in1^80 Statistical record ofImports In19o0
for the eifrht cate /^ories £>f Group I
and use ofthe ceilings
<s?c#
Only imports under statistical regimes 1and 3arecounted ;temporary
imports aretherefore excluded .

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie :i Unité :Tonnes
Régime contractuel AMF
Argentine
Bangladesh
Brésil
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombie
Corée duSud
Egypte
Guatemala
Haiti
Hong Kong
Hongrie
Inde
Indonésie
Macao
Malaisie
Mexique
Pakistan
Pérou
Philippines
Pologne
Roumanie
Singapour
Sri Lanka
Thaïlande
Uruguay
Yougoslavie
Total :
Régime coritractugy frpays préférentxHre
Espagne
Grèce
Malte
Maroc
PaMugalJtënisie
r
▼-.i.–I mTotal :1295
13271
911
3279
195
4401
68
1
1
55
•538
40
187
2031
1272
Régime desurveillance
ACP
Autres pays classe 2
Autres pays méditerr ,
Turquie
Total :99
60
ç<524^
2557
30285
8210
221.01
234
132
457
19
31153
1075
1137
15
21960
24187191
3412
603
660
45
1205
47
139
85
92
419
1195
147
58
8318
2822
6026
13
1071
56
29
0017
488
32
57
2183
2760517
2624
130
811
24
414
247
140
3C4^
2005
974
14
23
3772
11999BNL
571
5745
130
994
149
3211
245
48
"M
273
6660
305
201
165
7604
706
70
170
20134
21080'1380
1369
338
115
28
28
14979
1534
8374
_547
210
10
10675
512
23
99
7424
8058UK
100
614
41
398
538
383
*1391
93
557
58
47
4220
3282
2247
171
4539
9339
572
13
|2140
2725IRL
1028 |
82<
<$7
11
1862
177
131
124
432
87
87DK GR
56
m»
488 .
?8
217
6
731
I_
20 !-
362 ;224
116 i382
48
2162
1863
3846
2222
7931
5
52730
27182
1905
6425
419
10677
360
188
384
641
2548
40
2403
7743
3287
14
119
198
52
6510
73825
17261
49385
US
7773
58
77151
3353
1262
354
53933
58902

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie :1
(suite )Unité :Tonnes
4.Pégimes autonomes
Albanie
R#0aA•
Taiwan
Tchécoslovaquie
U.R.S.S.
Total ï
5.Régime TPP
Albanie
Bulgarie
Chine
Espagne
Grèce
Hongrie
Malte
Maroc
Pologne
Portugal
Roumanie
Tchécoslovaquie
.Tunisie '
Yougoslavie
Total :
6.Total "basprix
■ .11 /4 >
+3+4.♦5)«j®
7.Plafonds qWgbaux
internes :
CB
%d'utilisation :
8.-<yfrimes pays autres
/OTue "basprix de
5^revient "D F I BNL ÜK IRL 0K GR
22;.22
260 88 13 48-^Pi ·* 410
- 1 83 36 - - ■•M 120
- 15 63 14 - - - 92
260 104 181
<50
¿ï
F48
»1mm 644 '
•<t
t
-•
•
85885 21199 40864 33762 16332 2381 0099 >10522
87768 22812 55160 39299 24199 5236 0336t
>46569 .
96,3 92,2 72,5 83,4 67,7 43,3 94,1 . 84,3
14279 2443 1371 1266 4347 181 1434 25321
(1)quantités non-imputées :
Pérou
(qualité Tanguis 1168 143 558
etJ?ima )
Malte 234 13 305337 57 115 372
547 -2751

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie : Umté :Tonnes
I.
SudRégime contractuel AMF
Argentine "
Bangladesh
Brésil
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombie
Corée duSud
'Egypte
Guatemala
Haiti
Hong Kong
Hongrie
Inde
Indonésie
Macao -
Malaisie
Mexique
Pakistan
Pérou
Philippines
Pologne
Roumanie
Singapour
Sri Lanka
Thaïlande
Uruguay
Yougoslavie
Total :
Régime contractug^y
pays préfèrent û&S
Cena /inû ^#
Espagne ^
Grèce
Malte
Maroc
Pugal sie
Total :
Régime desurveillance
ACP
Autres pays classe 2
Autres pays méditerr .
Turquie
Total :•4628
142
3353
578
1154
306
91
654
323
5397
79
839
387
2840
462
1
582
1179
723
3131^
10
568
27427
135
5.94
500
2
i
1231
1116
1
182
1299- 37
τ 296
1751 3617
49 261
4144 1827
285 1974
535 537
669 1737
324
244
4520
30
85
41
1772
211
jt
273
348
6725 i
259
1326
1174
609
3138
6506
5112
14
222
5348759
81
2589
82
462
151
2670
719
23
191
262
291
1665
34
3400
23665
58
532
62
204
317
1173
754
245
196
1062
2257BNL
935
3253
198
806
822
1
369
29
1956dUK
?206
1507
198
10
94
413
145
631
124
Il1984
269
1738
107
28
397
2426
4965
266
290
55647
1267
1369
466
948
723
14
6982
S274d$3010*300
452
44
7995
92
77
10
407
833
199
35509
67
394
4
2301
128
2894
1120
44
115
1279IRL
101
189
4
216
2
248
19
71
26
2
878
33
2
109
144
12DK GR
111
12ri4
1832
139
8
298
623
124
!111
;352
50
29
224
22
595
94
5684
5
163
605
773i-84
296
12410
.452
15193
3515
5812
4397
109
9312
1251
28343
503
2237
940
17155
1732
34
1495
*2925
1772
7128
44
4733
121872
826
4749
173
1202
4725
6011
17636
8387
303
197
1871
10757

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie ;2 Unité :Tonnes
(suite )
4.Qégimes autonomes
(Corée duNord )
Albanie
R.D.A.
Taiwan
Tchécoslovaquie
U.R.S.S.
Total :
5.Régime TPP
Albanie
Bulgarie
Chine
Espagne
Grèce
Hongrie
Malte
Maroc
Pologne r
Portugal
Roumanie
Tchécoslovaquie
Tunisie '
Yougoslavie
Total :
6.Total "basprtx
derevient "(1+
+3+4+5)¿
7.Plafonds g^Faux
internes :
Xd'utilisation :
8.J^imes paysautres^frque "basprix"dë
revient "
»––––1158
2212
■298
3668
33625
44131
75/2
1280132
287
106 56 7
298 959 1678
960 264 158
61 563 418
1457 2129 2261
30036 29224
39193
76-134422
88,1
9012 24125BNL
&
19766
24307
80,3
4278UK
10
434
197
2
643
40324
71207
56/5
9534IRL
42*338
341
1375
4540
30/3
372DK
521
356
1355
7819
0343
75/1
1313GR
&#C£E
#°42
287
260
4957
4610
1698
11854
162169
228581
70/3
61435
(1)quantités non-imputées :
Pérou
(qualité Tanguis 426 203 583 134 67
et3Hma )
Halte - 62 10648 1445

REALISATIONS 1980
Catégorie : 3 ,Unité iTonnes
I.Régime contractuel AMF
Argentine
Bangladesh
Brésil
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombie
Corée duSud
Egypte
Guatemala
Haiti
Hong Kong
Hongrie
Inde
Indonésie
Macao
Malaisie
Mexique
Pakistan
Pérou
Philippines
Pologne
Roumanie
Singapour
Sri Lanka
Thai lande
Uruguay
Yougoslavie
Total :
Régime contractuel ^
payspréférentiel ^^ i–î : qVEspagne
Grèce
Malte
Maroc
Portugal
/SSfotal ïr
Régime desurveillance16
198
353
12
208
22
831
ACP
Autres pays classe 2
Autres pays méditerr ,
Turquie
Total :51
103
12
903 <
11
2.720
97
593
435
.3
1.133
1
12
1
61
7547
217
509
mm
857
114
69
290
2
31
497 ,t
9
.112
379
756
7
367
.509
13
1
14"83
10
159
1.818
76
13
189
1.120
95
31
21
2.966
37
6.618BNL UK
12
66
747458
11
189
1
713 14469
3 1105
1k541J^94
147
87
94
328
13
9
48
22
1025
35
8
416
14
12.157
160
54
383
6
603493
7
47
8
48
503
6.447
72
1
2.131
2.204
21
48
12
81IRL
30
27"DK GR
à,
10
1
49
82
5
26
251
281
28829
14
176
135
33
452
.7!1!
238
256CEE
630
26
678
3.696
1
12
6.362
■272
6
393
3.055
106
-
38
216
670
123
5.369
•104
21.757
880
1.496
7
3.929
9
6.321
27
42
100
95
274

REALISATIONS 1980
Catégorie :3
(suite )Unité :Tonnes
4.Régimes autonomes
Albanie
'R.D.A.
Taiwan
Tchécoslovaquie
U.R.S.S.
Total :
S»Régime TPP
Albanie
Bulgarie
Chine
Espagne
Grèce
Hongrie
Malte
Maroc
Pologne
'Portugal
Roumanie
Tchécoslovaquie
^,Tunisie 'Yougoslavie
Total :
6.Total "basprix
derevient "C1
♦3♦4♦5)^
7.Plafonds glopaux
internes :
.Xd'utilisation : i? ~
8,<ffggimes pays autres^VQue "basprix de
W ■ TT!revient "1.154
574
1.728
5.656
0.238
55.2
3.92333
767
139
939T3
22
1.705
1.740
.574 8.788
.269 9.284
67,4 93,6
.783 10.550BNL
20
1.782
55
1.857
619
584
60,9
.619UK IRL
13
314
8
2
r*
14
.069 553
4.183 1.345
63,9 41,1
1-
0.750 440DK#"
6
1
66
774
.093
37,0
529GR xsK >CEE
13
135
5.745
785
3
6.681
35.033
53.479
65,5
131.594

Réalisation 1980
Catégorie :* Unité :1000pièces
1.Régime contractuel AMFArgentine "
Bangladesh
Brési l
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombie
Corée duSud
Egypte
Guatemala
Haiti
Hong Kong
Hongrie
„Inde
Indonésie
Macao
Malaisie
Mexique
Pakistan
•Pérou
Philippines
.Pologne
Roumanie
«Singapour
Sri Lanka
Thai lande
Uruguay
Yougoslavie
Total :
Régime contractuej^y 'payspréférentiels
WEspagne
Grèce
Malte
Maroc
Portugal
T^isie^Total :
Régime desurveillance
ACP
Autres pays classe 2
Autres pays méditerr
Turquie
Total :0 F I BNL UK
12
3248 195 -• 483 628
168 79 14 1-
1118 1260 491 56 341
30 -
2504 4791 612 761 1621
3941 295 - 466 597
- 40 -
10255 551 250 2063 9743
305 435 ' 47 106 2
2260 1610 680 566^1918
11 104 25 13
2180 3730 50 5^ 1861
997 682 82 ,<5^55 570
24- -^ 11863 2274 6^ 981 2275
131 10 - 144
2533 1265 77 400 835
4405 2057 - 75 613
7337 44M^ 5 1142 2423
3451 2SV 85 781 1414
128 - - 132
132^*681 136 242 1667
582 42 1 29 2
48669 25042 2583 9296 26800
1407 592 - 1983 19
28657 3069 73 3791 1260
25 42 - 5 151
56 3054 - 239 10
6129 4806 224 .4463 21747
2418 941 1 640 -
38692 12504 298 11121 23187
2121 403 14 63 465
164 1 20 '3 9
483 6 1 82 85
6009 449 7 1117 275
8777 861 42 1265 834IRL
64
15
69
3
14
335
4
4
167
175
19
19DK
63.
&
198
8
-
135 506
am 7
10 315
- 1
18 83 .
3 82 .
– 355GR
161
130
256
381
'260
13
2902
34
131
36
1689
1890
49
24
29
10212
4617
262
3349
30
10551
5309
40
*23503
902
7367
156
8469
2971
25
7754
'285
15286
7280
11658
8539
263
6329
•671
115627
4039
36985
259
3360
39225
4000
87867
3115
197
700
7886
11900

Réalisations 1980»
»
Catégorie s4
(suite ) *.Unité1000 Pièces
4.Pégrmes autonomes
Mongolie
Albanie
R.D.A.
Taiwan
Tchécoslovaquie
U.R.S.S.
Total :
5.Régime TPP
Albanie
Bulgarie
Chine
Espagne
Grèce
Hongrie
Malte
Maroc
Pologne
Portugal
Roumanie
Tchécoslovaquie
Tunisie '•
Yougoslavie
Total ;
6.Total "basprix^
derevient "(1
+3+4+5)^
7.Plafonds globauxr
internes :
... CDsation :
a^yègimes paysnue "bas nri >autres
J»S que"basprix de
revientD*
2003
557
«•
2560
442
55
1
871
1375
00073
75148
t
95/0
11208 .111
228
74614
46
44
1085 104
9
948
961
40453
55371
71/8
85883027
7734
39/2
131906NL
11
1892
165
2068
206
1
23
230
23979
31675
75/7
3577UK 'IRL
49
746
795
s>
51616 532
59991 1061
86/0 50/0
7515 331DK GR CEE
11
220
274 I-
5168
7522
68/2,
63014
111
103
4928
1733
6889
648
9
55
4
950
.893
2566
224848
267962
83/7
45039
(1)quantités non-imputées :
Malte 25 42
Grèce 28657
TPP Tunisie - 62636
626

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie : Unité1000 Pièces
BNL
I.Régime contractuel AMF
Argentine
Bangladesh
Brési l
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombie
Corée duSud
Egypte
Guatemala
Haiti
Hong Kong
Hongrie
Inde
Indonésie
Macao
Malaisie
Mexique
Pakistan
Pérou
Philippines
Pologne
Roumanie
Singapour
Sri Lanka
Thai lande
Uruguay
Yougoslavie
Total :
Régime contractuel ^
pays préfèrent iejy *
FcnannoEspagne
Grèce
M^lte
Maroc
Portugal
Whsie
^Total :
Régime desurveillance542
356
1509
2
5756
4210 1Q· 1
171 I- 50
375 436 86
1392 1032 5668
21 I- -UK
328
6
678
10304
14 - - -, J
12799 440 460 2503 110442
542 590 219 74 M72
558 373 504 55 j5869
1 - 2 -^4
4808 2424 317 80^^ 1637
218 503 73 à&T 212
126 3 - 10
768 53 12 53 120
85 30 11 8 148
1193 197 107 127 624
313 507 ν- 61 452
3854 10*$^233 400 1157
1731 À§5r 161 210 984
85 ç^ - 9 71
2151 V'210 181 285 1490
36 - 11 1
495 66 1 10 75
37984 8850 3770 110702 2918'
ACP
Autres pays classe 2
Autres pays méditerr .
Turquie
Total :37984
67
14β44
1
42
1752
355372
1397
876
4386
6896
1
5
19
17061 7720 35
1509 1768 1196
120 25 12
121 1 9
487 90 -
2237 1884 121810702
354
12857
3
•55
919
146
4334
1566
f!724
19
162629186
1330
59
11
4489
5901
256?
•31
96
23
2717XRL
1
21
S
27
3
8
2
1
28
«•
10
32
3
45
3
1
376*DK GR
737
77
120
426
20
•41
16
326
34
62
62
380
1
7.
2698
34
1
165
200
20
3
23194
mm
363
566
55
1
4
62L«5^
■τ
320
Γ892
590
3145
2
24683
63
3
15
27408
1675
1882
7
10423
1267
194
1049
!299
2603
1367
6730
3645
172
4741
52 .
654
93563
811
20662
65
989
12093
1197
35817
8681
214
232
619
9765

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie !
(suite )Unité s1000 Pièces
4.Pégtmes autonomes
Corée dunord
Albanie
R.D.A.
Taiwan
Tchécoslovaquie
U.R.S.S.
Total Î
5.Régime TPP
Albanie
Bulgarie
Chine
Espagne
Grèce
Hongrie
«alte
Maroc
Pologne
Portugal
Roumanie
Tchécoslovaquie
Tunisie '
Yougoslavie
Total ;
6.Total "basprix
derevient "(1+
+3+4+5)
7.Plafonds glfffcuxinternes :
Xd'utilisation ^:
8.ffinines pays autres"basprix de^revient "14885
1647
5532
10
«m
2
101
6
72
67
<
1175
1433
64247
61$05
103/9
8021BNL UK IRL
63
1
14
48
168
294495
20
51546
4621
41
4708100
6433
55
6588F
15<f
'124
139
18887
22121
79/1
3168 !34
34
5569
7851
70/9
21362137
24133
76/7
484244392
5054é
87/8
7257608
1010
60/2
86DK GR
14
95
3421
4167
82/2
1442&EE
163
186
16546
945
17741
10
7
101 -
6
73
15
67
124
•1É11
1614
158 503
182 013
87/1
26952
(1)quantités non-imputees :
Malte 7 - 13* -
Grèce - 1397 6 2862 -

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie :6 Unité ï1QOOp.
1.Régime contractuel -AMF
.
5.Argentine
Bangladesh
Brési l
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombie
Corée duSud
Egypte
Guatemala
Haiti
Hong Kong
Hongrie
Inde
Indonésie
Macao
Malaisie
Mexique
Pakistan
Pérou
Philippines
Pologne
Roumanie
Singapour
Sri Lanka
Thai lande
Uruguay
Yougoslavie
Total :
contractueLy Régime contract
pays préférenti
Espagne Hr
Grèce
Malte
Maroc
Portugal
TjsjfHsie
otal:^-
Régime desurveillance570
8
2829
18
1470
1
2
2
19318
48
567
346
4333
574
286
34
2169
151
25
202î
82j
545
12
13Sw
ACP
Autres pays classe 2
Autres pays méditerr
Turquie
Total :3630a
968
5720
2669
192
773
2303
12625
756
53
93
944
184615
10
1115
79
587
3'
197
112
622
310
43
6
173
T62
73
100
1
7514 3
1713
233
270
3426
182
3561
9385
741
2
63
11
817I IBNL IUK
•.20 110 152
7
84 897 231
41 3
171 1093 1245
8
399 2418 18956
4 111I-
274 117i& 195
941 973^1575
421 1^71 247-^574 99
15^ 249 280- 6 48
1C- 55: 53
25 58 48
1805 142 149
147 1650 705
179 44 353
15 228 111
27] 119 23
833!1056424473IRL "DK
13 78
•Vf*293
1
55
1082
1
334
1473
165
1
15
1811056439 2154
4 37
63
9 39
144
15
1
124105
8
3
258
89
185
3850
1451 306 5 12
233 88 - 30
"1240 489 1 6
517 1- -
78D 2099 10 332
2941 571 - 53
7162 3554 16 433
300 228mm
30 55 2-
24.3 364 6 •47
262 103«· 57
835 750 8 .104GRr
958
25
5531
69
4387
10
2
2
43871
166
1391
3161
8842
1701
1024
95
;
3
5
13068
299
3021
5956
1575
1188
13
•311
86666
4455
6360
5756
4136
4178
9763
34648
2190
143
816
1392
4541

i
i9
!
1<
Réalisations 1980
Catégorie :
(suite )Unité :1000 Pièces
4.Pégimes autonomes
Corée duNord
Albanie
R.D.A.
Taiwan
Tchécoslovaquie
U.R.S.S.
Total :
5.Régime TPP
Albanie
Bulgarie
Chine
Espagne
Grèce
Hongrie '
Malte
Maroc
Pologne
Portugal
Roumanie
Tchécoslovaquie
Tunisie '
Yougoslavie
Total :
6.Total "basprix
derevient "(1
♦3♦♦♦5).# -
7.Plafonds aux
internes
Xd'utilisation "^
jL&teqimes pays autres
que "basprix de^ ;revient14
6
1931
256
2201
3 1
19 1
3
24 1
1363 2
617
5 7
352 «
126 1
50 £237 S
143>2
2125 -
5067 3
58047
48428
92.3
585317 I-.. -
264 45' . -
24 8 73
45 22 844
10 I- 25
360 75
11
16
15
316
793
47
2597
3915
21991 5562
16817 7074
113.4 60.6
102 1178BNL
942
"^f.
206
•»
202
63
2
542
193
1532
21035
17700
105.7
2897UK
27
306
333
29110
31943
87.0
6619IRL DK GR
157
383
39.9
35817
25
2
11
4423 -
4998 -
84.4 -
103917
324
139
3158
307
3945
14
35
322
45
1885
624
798
601
246
113
239
3282
2320
10525
140325
14309'
91.7|
19044
(1)quantités non-imputées :
Hong-Kong 4203 50 138 487 1233 3 158 6272
Malte 3286 270 1082 1240 - 1 13
Grèce 5744 248 55 238 88 - 32 –
TPP Marocmm 523 - - - - - 523
TPP Tunisie - 1714 - 358 - - 2072
TPP Portugal '126 120 - - - «m M mm•246

Reatisations,1980
Catégorie : Unité î <1000 Pièces
Régime contractuel AMF
Argentine
Bangladesh
Brési l
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombie
Corée duSud
Egypte
Guatemala
Haiti
Hong Kong
Hongrie
Inde
Indonésie
Macao
Malaisie
Mexique
Pakistan
Pérou
Philippines
Pologne
Roumanie
Singapour
Sri Lanka
Thai lande
Uruguay
Yougoslavie
Total :
Régime contractuel ^^
payspréférenti<^|3s#
Espagne
Gr6ce
Malte
Maroc
PortugalI^isie
Total :
Régime desurveillance7
128
144
316
2
2643
234
7
258
18780
112
9501
480
752
132
7
288
582
542
44
2676
1105 ,
868*3
ACP
Autres pays classe 2
Autres pays méditerr .
Turquie
Total :1
159
39768
18
615
501
1577
1329
4141
8181
8
90
164
425
68710
17
156
382
424
49
2650
98
1891
1020
1
224
164
27"L#W
83
9176
454
308
316
290
1373
269
2
29
151
45131
58
256
287
89
1237
76
165
2
4
64
10
56
86
93
2515
10
13
23BNL UK
35
19496
95
125
2871
16
2
2767 6039
2 [42158 ±$066
212^2266039
Jt4066
31# ■
316
79
9
568
237
213
44
8915
25
88
53
129
705
115
1115
95
44
110
266
515 •709
84
3
120
373
75
7
977
526
211
27
16560
1
338
34
421
239
1033
410
26
926
1362IRL
«V
14
98s
6
3-DK GR
30
5
1
168
25
29.£
234
1
446
46
480
233
137
35
» .
56
59
22
16
317
89
144
2
2396
15
9
1
433
13
471
115
84
116
86
40113
238
192
764
2
8339
250
8
260
28757
302
20190
1331
3968
1282
15
1015
1321
675
319
5892
2411
1717
1 .
236 .
79498
67
1051
1053
2883
2350
4798
12202
925
252
1350
929
3456

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie î 7
(suite )Unité :1000 Pièces
4.Pégitnes autonomes
Albanie
R.D.A.
■Taiwan
Tchécoslovaquie
U.R.S.S.
Total ï
5*Régime TPP
Albanie
Bulgarie
Chine
Espagne
Grèce
Hongrie
Malte
Maroc
Pologne
Portugal
Roumanie
Tchécoslovaquie
Tunisie '
Yougoslavie
Total :
6.Total "basprix
derevient "(1+2
+3+4+5 )^ +3+4+5 )
?.Plafortds ql(^5ljx
internes
y,d'utilisation ™
8.Régimes pays autress&Êïe "basprix "de^revient "2301
.2301
1153
82
92
1001
2930
153
19
1463
184
329
13
27<1955
9401
60338
45564
118.8
4439BNL UK IRL
41
14
mm
565
9
71 698 278
85 698
3
30
yt
185
11241
12731
84.9
762634
5758
45.7
71?
177
393
9
45
224
845
•12088
13222
90.7
750278
29
29
19262
31181
61.8
6731
204
333
61.9
85DK GR
22
1
39
1
45
3335
2972
110.7
394
(1)quantités non-imputées :
TPP Portugal 184 130
TPP Espagne- 92
Grèce 5142 290
Malte 747 4314
92
88 48

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie :8 Unité ï1000 Pièces
I.Régime contractuel AMF
Argentine
Bangladesh
Brésil
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombie
Corée duSud
Egypte
Guatemala
Haiti
Hong Kong
Hongrie
Inde
Indonésie
Macao
Malaisie
Mexique
Pakistan
Pérou
Philippines
Pologne
Roumanie
Singapour
Sri Lanka -
Thai lande
Uruguay '
Yougoslavie
Total :
Λ
Régime contractuel
pays préférentiels ^
Espagne
Grèce
Malte
Maroc
PortugalS?
T^sié
y^Total :*
Régime desurveillance
ACP
Autres pays classe 2
Autres pays méditerr
Turquie
Total :DIF I IBNL IUK IIRL I-DKIGR ICEE
-• " " " -<# "
37 154 21 - 108 - - - 320
304 1 - 5 6 - 2 - 318
2101 293 93 95 • - 47 2629
2772 834 332 406 859 1 5706
21265 434 876 6878 2393 26^140 I- 32012
191 134 - 348 96 -.<^1 - - 769IfI Im/T JTU /V ISJ7
1 - - - -^ - 1
13 - - - - - - 13
19231 683 1321 2882 18011 45 1366 - 43539
142 88 '33 18 125 9 415
3846 793 4079 1855 »3158 35 535 - 14300
671 734 407 197^^476 33 244 - 3762
538 2417 653 191^ 1171 2 617 •- 5589
1075 2222 38 24fl^ 193 - 382 .- 4150
2 3 * - " 5
170 48 I85 ^fZ00 1084 25 :38 I- !1650
38 - - 38
1612 158 422 468 163 71 296 3190
155 102 - 17 228 5 13 - 520
3371 643^612 238 519 - 164 - 5547
1209 129^y 267 287 1075 57 413 - 4606
2250 2Sfr' 285 537 669 21 58 - 4051
213 -Λ8Ό 340 242 189 14 Ι591 I- 11669
2 >>- I- - - - - 2
1055 239 48 529 15 - 2 - 1889
62226 11588 9913 15633 31576 335 5419 - 136690
9 15 27 36 20 3 3 - 113
1 ; - 1. 68 - 18 - 88
134 2550 3 527 12 - - - 3226
1616 2022 61 1548 1703 48 324 - *7322
2526 -527 159 - - - 3211
326 98 1 1199 10 - 2 - 1636 ,
'4612 5212 92 3470 1813 '51 347 - 1559?
•• '
46 1058 22 109 475 2 10 1722
33 2 40 3 153 2 233
.35 13 - 117 341 10 .109 - 625
143 549 16 6 26 - 1 - 741
257 1622 78 235 995 12 122 - 3321 I

Réalisations 1980
Catégorie : 8
(suite )Unité1000 Pièces
w
4.Qégimes autonomes
Corée dunord
Albanie
R.
Taiwan
Tchécoslovaquie
U.R.S.S.
Total ï
5.Régime TPP
Albanie
Bulgarie -
Chine
Espagne
Grèce
Hongrie
Malte
Maroc
Pologne
Portugal
Roumanie
Tchécoslovaquie
Tunisie
Yougoslavie
Total :
6.Total "
derevi6.Total "basprix
derevient "<1
*3♦*♦5^
7.Plafonds globaux
internes :
Y,^'utilisationCD
*8igiSreqimes pays autres
que"basprix de
revient- 39
88 61
584 172
– 9
5919 106 184
389 113 70.
6980
244
106
1356
12
1
2640
25
52
831
5060
10327
84402
87401
95.9
7885BNL UK IRL
1374 674
491 263
2
8
V-:t
705
899
19812 10346
17880 11504
107.4 89.91374 674
770 1794r
45
112
48
159
2434
2798
.23510
20964
111.9
59635058
m
45838
76.5
197825
402
730
55.2
202DKgraT cee
27
5915
6513
90.8
14139
149
756
9
8285
575
9813
244
108
8
1401
12
139
2752
119
52
1695
7.494 .
14Ô24
179445 .
191727
93.0
13366
(1)quantités non-imputées :
TPP Portugal 25 46
TPP Maroc - 91
TPP Tunisie 548 46548 119
91
1013

ΑΤΓΓΠΧ ΤΤ
Trend ofimports into "theCommunity (l97&$jw )
oririnatin£ inthe main supplier countries ,
inorder ofimport ancffom 1980
(MFAproduota -Groupa ItoV) 

TREND OPIMPORTS INTO THEEEC (1976-80 )FROM THEPRINCIPAL SUPPLIER COUNTRIES ,INORDER OP
(MFAproducts -Groups ItoV) Unit :
»vis 0.11
»1976 1980 AVERAGE
ANNUAL
COUNTRIESQuantityX
Extra1977 1978 1979QuantityX
ExtraCHANGE
1980-76
as %
USA 150,7 10,4 127,3 128/1 211/5 242,7 13,9 +12/6
HONG KONG 144,6 10,0 114,8 125,7 134,9 126,9 7/3 -3/2
GREECE 82,9 5/7 79,0 92,2 100,8 105,6 6/1 +5/9
SOUT KOREA 65,2 4,5 81,7 83,1 80,0 83,9 4/8 W/4^,1
>-0/6AUSTRIA
INDIA62,0
76,54/3
5/361.8
70.971,6
53,978,5
74,578,8
74,44/5*4/3^
PORTUGAL 54,8 3/8 47,7 65,6 81,0 73,5 4/2 +7/8
SWITZERLAND 53,7 3/7 56,6 65,4 71,1 71,9
<F!**4/1
'3,7+7/8
TURKEY 84,8 5/9 60,8 80,4 91,6 -6/6
TAIWAN 56,8 3/9 56,1 57,6 60,8 3,6 +2/6
SPAIN 47,1 3/3 49,1 60,6 58,0 3/5 +6/3
BRAZIL 48,4 3/3 50,9 47,6 58,0 59,9 3/4 +5/5
CHINA 36,5 2/5 27,8 30,9 40,7 58,7 3/4 +12/6
PAKISTAN 31/7 2/2 23,3 28,3
^29,842,5 2/4 +7/79
JAPAN 25,4 1/8 30,927'2^
^439,2 2/6 +11/4
YUGOSLAVIA 42,1 2/9 30,6 38,8 35,9 2/1 -3/6
ROMANIA 39,8 2/7 27,8 36,0 30,2 1/7 -5/53
CSSR 24,7 27/5 28,2 27,7· 1/6
TUNISIA 14,1 1/0 16,3 16,4 22,3 26,9- 1/5 +17/41
HUNGARY
THAILAND22,6
19,11/6
1/34#19,9
19,021,0
22,224,2
24,023,5-
23,21/3
1/3+0,99
+4,88
POLAND 19,8 17,6 20,8 21/5- 1/2 +2,18
MOROCCO 15,6 1/1 14,9 16,6 20,9 21,1 - 1/2 +7,79
EGYPT 11,1 0,8 11,6 11,0 20,6 19,1 1/1 +14,52
MACAO16#
<3^3,51/2 13,6 12,1 15,8 18,0 1/0 +1,5
SWEDEN- 14,1 15,0 15,8 17,6 1/0
SINGAPORE 0,9 13,5 11,0 13,8 12,8 0/7 -5,19
MALAYSIA *13,4 0,9 15,6 14,0 13,8 12'5 0/7' 1'72
URUGUAY 8,9 0,6 10,1 9/6 10,4 11,7 0/7 +6,98
MALT
CÇI^felA,^ILIPPINES8,5
12,80,6
0/98/1
8/110/7
8/311,4
9/611,1
10,60/6
0/6+6,98
-4
4,8 0/3 5/8 5'3 9/8 9/5 0/5 +18,62
'VERU2/1 0/1 4/4 8/4 11,8 8,6 0/5 +2,41
BULGARIA 4,3 0/3 4/2 3/8 6/2 6,7 0/4 +11,76
ARGENTINA 6,0 0/4 12/5 11/0 5/9 6,5 0/4 +1,94
MEXICO 10,0 0/7 6,5 4/1 6,8 6/1 0/4 -8,58
INDONESIA 0,3 0,02 0/8 2/0 3/2 4/3 0/2 +97
URSS•6/1 6/8 6/7 4/2 0/2
SRI LANKA 0,2 0,01 0/4 1/0 2/2 3/2 0/2. +130
CYPRUS 0/2 0,01 0/7 1/5. 2/2 2/2 0/Ί +18,92

KK1T5X III
SBreakdown ofImports
between textile and clothinr.«roduet8£
forailthird coajji&ries
·&>/

s
-Répartition des importations dans laCommunauté desproduits des secteurs Textile /Habillement -<Groupes IàV)•^ .
a)Textile
b)Habillementy j
c)%des importations dJsecteur textile surletotal
Unité :1000 tonnes
Pays
Extra-CEt
Pays indus­
trialisés
Pays couverts
par lapoliti­
quetextile
Pays préféren­
tiels méditer­
ranéens
Pays Accord
Clasoe II
Classe III
ra/jj
7.6 .8119 77
Text .
952,4
299/0
653,4
241.4
347,3
352.5
93,4Habi l.
380,4
32,3
348.1
42,3
250,9
229.2
51/171
90
65
85
58
61
65%
Text .
1.028,0
318.7
709,3
277,3
342.8
341,3
101,6397.8
34,8
363,0
72,4
255,3
236.9
52,772
V
66
79
57
59t
ι
66 ι19 79
Text .
1.221,5
423,0
'<%,5
307,8
401,2
392,1
111,7Habi l.
475,7
49,3
426,4
%
296,^;
430,6
64,172
90
65
77
58
48
6419 80
Text
1.228,9
466,7
762.2
264,0
385.3
.402,7
114.4
ηV--%%Habi l.
510,9
58,4
452,5
101,3
326,5
275,7
68,971
89
63
72
54
59
62

"Répartition desvtp^grtations dans taCommunauté dcr.produits dessecteurs Textile/Habil Icmcnt -(Groupes IàV)-*»/" »
a)Texti le
b)Habillement
c)Xdesimportations dusecteur t&feile surletotal\
:ï^_unité :Tonne
Pays 19 77
a).Text . ^Habil .c)χ
117.757 9.506 93
27.491 3.456 89
55.588 6.247 90
54.025 2.578 95
12.244 212 98
315 9 97
48.140 2.752 95
1.035 3.173 25
24.281 3.562 87
8.652 416 95
36.992 44.725 45
11.575 34 100
78 7 92
285 6 98
26.832 87.928 -23
10.996 11€694 4819 78 19 79
a)Tf?xt .b)Hob il.c), a)Text .b)Habi l.c)
%19 80
a)Text .b)Habi l.
U.S. A.
Japon
Autriche
Suisse119 .
22.73A8.474
4.507
64.143
62.250Ύ7.481
3.14193
83
90
95193.463
25.115
69.189
67.74918.085
4.663
9.308
3.32791
84
88
95219.743
32.437
68.956
68.25622.908
6.733
9.817
3.626
Argent me
Bongla-Desh
Brésil
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombie
Corée
Egypte
Guatemala
Haït\
Hong-Kong
Hongrie10.959
378
45.272
1.003
•27.701
8.022
37.831
10.908
108
27
29.174
9.25589
17
2.280
2.804
3.213
279
45.237
52
5
9
96.521
11.789fer%
26
90
97
46
100
96
75
23
44%5.847
219
54.789
*2.583
35.283
9.477
33.656
19.766
385
221
30.206 .
10.884h3
16
3.165
3.603
5.456
137
>46.359%86%
37
104.712
13.310100
93
95
42
87
99
42
98
99
86 .
22
45^?
%%6.489
520
56.708
3.Q45
46.079
10.512
36.039
17.957
502
207
24.823
9.9462
77
3.180
3.666
12.641
64
C47.876
1.149
9
128
102.088
13.539

%>%-Répartition desiwfiWtat ions dans taCommtjn.iutft do1;produits dessecteurs Textile /Habillement -(Groupes IàV)*/" »
a)Textile
b)Habillement
c)Xdesimportations dusecteur tew&ie surletotal
%Unité sTonne
Pays 19 77
a).Text . b)Habil .c)χ
117.757 9.506 93
27.491 3.456 89
55.588 6.247 90
54.025 2.578 95
12.244 212 98
315 9 97
48.140 2.752 95
1.035 3.173 25
24.281 3.562 87
8.652 416 95
36.992 44.725 45
11.575 34 100
78 7 92
285 6 98
26.832 87.928 -23
10.996 11.694 4819 78 19 79
a)Text .b)Habi I.c), a)Text .b)Habi I.c)
%19 80
a)Text .b)Habi I.le),
U.S. A.
Japon
Autriche
Suisse8.474
4.507
64.143
62.250m 4.507l%7.481
3.14193
83
90
95193.463
25.115
69.189
67.74918.085
4.663
9.308
3.32791
84
88
95219.743
32.437
68.956
68.25622.908
6.733
9.817
3.62691
83
88
95
Argent ine
Bangla-Desh
Brési l
Bulgarie
Chine
Colombi e
Corée
Egypte
Guatemala
Haïti
Hong-Kong
Hongrie10.959
378
45.272
1.003
27.701
8.022
37.831
10.908
108
27
29.174
9.25589
17
2.280
2.804
3.213
279
45.237
52
5
9
96.521
11.789M%5.847
219
95
26
90
97
46
100
96
75
23
44tø^54.789^2.583
35.283
9.477
33.656
19.766
385
221
30.206 .
10.8843
16
3.165
3.603
5.456
137
^.3593^86
37
104.712
13.310100
.93
95
42
87
99
42
98
99
86
22
456.489
520
56.708
3.04$
46.079
10.512
36.039
17.957
•'502
207
24.823
\2
77
3.180
3.666
12.641
64
o47.876
1.149
9
128
102.088
13.539100
87
95
45
78
99
43
94
98
62
20
42

2.-
Pays%
a)%977
TPXti
56.139
359
374
12.536
4.924
•
21.332
4.216
592
10.268
13.735
5.104
104
16.795
10.107
9.227b)Habi I.fc>\19 78
a)Text .b)Habi I.c)X1979
a)Text .b)Habi I,c)y.a)19 80
Text ,b)Habi I,
Inde
Indonési e
Macao
Malaisie
Mexi que
Paki stan
Pérou
Phitippin-ij
Pologne
Roumani e
Singapour
Sri-Lanka
Thai lande
Uruguay
Yougoslavie14.770
%
13.2ÔZÇ
3.053
1.591
1.954
168
5.168
8.696
14.063
8.409
340
3.106
85
21.44879
61
%
92
96
10
54
49
38
23
84
99
3040.725
355
284
10.799
3.372
26.710
9.702^5v>
17.729
4.550
137
18.545
9.485
10.98813.135
1.609
11.819
3.180
744
1.544
79
4.928
>7,927^17.674
6.471
898
3.650
119
19.18476
18
2
77
,82
95
99
8
55
50
41
36Ύ/Λ58.561
1.063
708
9.151
6.176
32.757
11.628
515
10.840
13.333
4.596
309
19.089
10.151
^19.52615.968
2.125
15.051
4.619
635
2.390
139
9.280
9.946
22.619
9.161
1.928
4.921
294
19.29679
33
4
66
91
93
99
5
52
37
33
14
80
97
5056.809
1.336
553
8.281
5.124
38.859
8.368
638
10.891
9.210
3.965
87
16.946
11.389
15.87317.638
2.962
17.470
4.214
1.009
3.674
185
8.843
10.637
21.003
8.821
3.120
6.259
275
20.035
Tai wan 35.346 20.759 63 35.985 21.579 63 37.088 23.700 61 38.037 24.812
Portugal
Espagne
Malte
Grèce
Turquie
Miroc
Tumî sie
Chypre
P/ii
n/.si38.085
42^309
1.763
58.905
57.148
10.415
5.434
869.577
6.746
6.335
20.116
3.163
4.527
10.856
57880
86
22
75
94
70
33
1352.755
53.005
2.899
69.518
77.145
11.921
4.276
17912.865
7.628
7.794
22.661
3.225
4.719
12.160
1.33680
87
27
75
96
72
26
1263.046
49.563
2.743
72.532
87.740
14.133
6.692
303,17.972 -
>Sä>
<%>8.429%?
5«THi .
3.869
6.814
15.601
1.92378
85
24
72
96
67
30'
1453.834
53.173
2.966
72.469
60.476
13.351
7.290r.cvur%,.<2519.625
6.923
8.144
33.127
4.387
7.761
19.640
1.744

Will bedistributed separatelyA-VTrTÇ IV
USE OPTHE 1950 QUOTAS
TJTDER THE BILATERAL TEXTILE ACREEKENT3
ARCENTINA
BRAZIL
BULGARIA
CHINA
COLOMBIA
KOREA
EGYPT
HONG KONO
HUNGARYINDIA
INDONESIA
MACAO
MALAYSIA
MEXICO
PAKISTAN
PERU
POLAND ^
PHILIPPE ^ ROMANIA
SINCAPO^S
SRIJ$&A
AN1
THAILAND
URUGUAI
TUGOSLA VXA
Por ENLcertain ofthestatistical data ar«derived froa provisional
figures «
Forth^£tate-trading countries outward processing traffio isidentified
separately *
ft

ATvrTÇ V
Problems Involved inadninisterinpr the azreenerrffr'
double checking
Λtariff classification
artisanal andhand-mat^çlroducts

ANNEX
PROBLEMS INTARIFF CLASSIFICATION ,THE SYSTEM OFDOUBLE
CHECKING AND HAND-MADE OR FOLKLORE PRODUCTS .
Problems intariff classification oftextile products with rqqard tothe
present cat?oorv syst?~ .used inthetextile agreements
®t_» ▲• vV'Itwould continue ^
tobenecessary tohave asystem which allows rapid classi.f icatroF'
decisions tobetaken .The special accelerated procedure for
textile classification has not given rise tomajor problems .
However ,fuller information icneeded inthedescription ofgoods ,
thejustification ofdecisions and inthe form of CCT explanatory
notes .
2.Classification decisions represented aninterpre^^lon ofexisting
Community lawandshould therefore take effect.<q^mediately afterthe Member States hadbeen notified .However ;5^
this could produce prejudicial effects onthe trade ofexporting
countries incertain circumstances ,for instance ,where aclassifi­
cation decision produced asignificant change inpractice within the
Community .
3.Itwasessential that third counjfcjMes should begiven full informationregarding' decisions atthe saraS *imeasthe Member States were
informed . v
4. itwas highly desirable that the Commission should
publish acompendium^of textile classification decisions andrules asquickly aspossibletfSir
5. There was atendency for exporters totry tocircumvent lifats (andregulations )byfraudulent declarations orby
exploiting loopholes inCommunity definitions .
There had been particular problems inthis area with suits ,industrial
anddfccupational clothing andfolklore goods .
Problems concerned with the system ofdouble checking within thetextile
agreements
1.Itwas necessary toestablish arule concerning thevalidity ofexport
licences .

2.Member States needed tobeable tocancel animport authorization
where they were notified that the export licence had been cancelled .
Provision should also bemade tocover thesituation where alicence *
wascancelled buttheMember State wasnotinformed bytheexporting *^
country until after the goods had arrived .
3.There appeared tobeacertain tendency for thesterilisation of
licences byimporters whoobtained licences without theintention
ofimporting the goods .
4.Despite thedifficulties sometimes encountered byce^ain authoritiesitdidnotseemfeasible tochange the5-day limit^br theissuing
ofimport licences . «y
5.Astandardisation oflicence numbering would bebeneficial toboth
Member States and exporting countries .
Anindividual expo#ticeoce should only cover onc
category . Xs?
7.Aprocedure forthe checking djpthe authenticity ofexport licences
seem^ .-Jesiracle
8.Each copy ofthe export licence ought tohave itsstatus marked on
it <i.e. original . copy ,,etc.).
9.Anofficial li^jJof bodies authorized toissue licences andcertifi­cates oforigifc should perhaps bepublished .
10.Certain specific problems were encountered which are currently
being ^studied bythe Commission 'sservices :
-JJsjPpresent certain Member States were unsure ifthey were.^empowered byRegulation 3059/78orother Community instruments
'V'torefuse ordelay the entry ofgoods where the Community
classified the goods inacategory subject tolimits which have
already been reached and the export licence showed the goods as
being classified inacategory for which there were nolimits
orthere wasstill apossibility ofexportation .
-Aprocedure was needed tocover the situation where anexport
licence ,originally issued toan.exporter ,waspresented for
animport authorization inthe name ofadifferent exporter .
-Similarity ,itwas necessary toknow whether thevalidity of
animport licence could beextended and,ifso,.for how long .
-There was need ofclarification inthe event ofgoods which were
exported under avalid export licence during one quota year being
left inawarehouse orfree port and imported inalater quota
year .

Handmade and folklore products * <A>
1.Handloom goods
Itwas technically impossible todetermine incertain cases whether
goods were hand-made ormachine-made .Perhaps theonljQ&ay tocontrol authenticity Was byenquiries inThird countrjayT
2.Folklore
Thelists offolklore products needed tobeimproved :they must
have greater clarity and beeasier toapply .Member States must
receive asquickly aspossible comprehensive information concerning
such products .
3.Itwas recognised that there was a^wfed toformalise the agreements
reached for both handloom andfol*Jore products onalegal basis .Publication ofthelists would tften bepossible .
4.Intheopinion ofcertain Member States adefinition of"cottage
industry units "inthecontext oftheabovs-^entioned products would
prove useful . 

  
Report ontheapplication ofArticle 6
oftheWka<fTreeinents (basl^S extractor )
byggfcegory
ij^supplier cotmtryr
Docuqgnt covering theperiod 1.1.197® to31»8.198lJ?

Lif
goi
1
1
3
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7%VRAPPORT SURLAPPLICATION DEL'ARTICLE 6
DES ACCORDS AMF (SORTIE DUPANIER )
ons envigueur
•tat (s)
nembre(s ),
:oncerné(s )\
Pays tiers vis&f >Unité
Hongrie
Hongrie
Brésil
Egypte
Philippines
Inde
Inde
Philippines -
Indonésie
Indonésie
Inde
Indonésie
Indonésie
Indonésie
Indonésie
Brésil
Indonésie
Philippines
Indonésietonne
I
tonne
tonne
1000p .
M
M
•I
••
••
••
II
•I%Seui lde
sortie
77
Si
103% ,
67
67
30
286
80
36
51
57
57
354
92Niveau de
limitation
250
235
364
575
172
110
"L
315 .
700
300
330
160
17
80
105
150
2800
171Taux de
croissance
6X
6X
4X
4%
6X
6X
6X
4X
mm
4X
6X
4X
4XRéférences
Règlement
JOL294 du21.11.79
JOL207DU9.3.80
JOLÏ49DU18.6.79
JOL13DU18.1.80
JOL182 DU16.7.80
JOL292 DU7.11.80
%
JOL294 DU21.11.79
JOL496^3.2.80
JOL13DUi^l.80
JOL182DU1&.80
.t

-/
/
r/RAPPORT SUR L'APPLICATION DEL'ARTICLE 6
DESACCORDS AMF (SORTIE DUPANIER )
1.Limitations envigueur ."
•Catégorie Etat (s) Pays tiers visé Unité Seuil de Niveau de Taux devit
croissar ^pRéférences
menbre(s ) sortie limitation Règlement
concerné(s )
8 F Indonésie 1000p . 72 475 limitée provisoires pour 1981 uniquement
8 I Indonésie .IL59 475 ,II IL II II M
8
9IRL β
UKM
*
•
Egypte··
tonnes4
75€>
19
61IL 1» 1» »·
JOL207 DU9.8.80
10 F Macao 1000p . 78 5X JOL149 DU18.6.79
10 ΥΚ Thaïlande··-128 500 6X JOL212 DU15.8.80
•
11 F•
MalaisieII185 1300 6X JOL149 DU18.6.79
-11
11*F
ΥΚ
•Pakistan
PakistanII
HL#
?235800
15006X
6XJOL304 DU30.11.79 .
JOL·304 DU30.11.79
11« .UK... . MacaoM^4500 6X " JOL185 DU18.7.80
11 ..F MacaoV
•I 1300 6XM
t
»
»
11 F Hongrieη101 462 6X»·
12 BNLPhilippines ^Philippines ^
Corée^
PhilippinesII314 1.100 6X*
•13
13 *3NL
BNL"··
H248
228650
750uniquement
1980
6XJOL49DU23.2.80
• T«« ··«··
13 CEE192603 6400 6X
«
.14B .. UK ·. HongrieH12 47 4X .10L347DU31.12.79
Taiwan 41 42 " 6/5X–*JOL322DU18.12.79 **·15B
15B
16BNL^
ΤBNLTaiwan
Philippines··
M20
160
Β*6X
6X•
»
17
cInde ·H17 175
•6X JOL149DU18.6.79 .
* *·.
.0 ·% 'm'*'
% *v ,

RAPPORT SUR L'APPLICATION DELARTICLE 6
DES ACCORDS AMF (SORTIE DUPANIER )
1.Limitations envigueur
•Catégorie Etat(s )
»embre(s )
concerné (sjPays tiers visé Unité Seuil de
sortieNiveau de
liaitation3W'
Tauxcrois^ceRéférences
Règlement
17 UK Pologne 1000p . 31 120 4X JOL215 DU23.8.79
17 UK Philippinesit31 6X JOL35 DU12.2.80
17
17UK #
FInde
Indelì
ρ
H39
30 ^106X
6X
18 BNL Rouoanie tonnes 7 98 2X JOL229 DU11.9.79
18 I ChineII14 150 4X •'
20 UK CoréeH
^w-
78 -100 " 4X JOL325 DU21.12.79
X 20
20
20---UK
.BNL
·-·!··Egypte
Egypte
PakistanM
I^210
280
4206X
6X
6Xm
21
%BNL Inde ■1OOOp· 52 560 6X JOL149 DU18.6.79 ~
21
21 .CEE
UKPhilippines
Thaïlande
Thailand· ^·»
M494
1162350
5005X
6XJQL13 DU18.1.80
JOL343 DU31.12.79
21 DK··
-100 6XH
>···»·· .
·· · «·
21UK#Sri Lanka 'H79 370 "" 6X
21
21Chine
ChineM
.M155185
2506X
.6X•
• · ·
*"
.... ·.·.^ Γ·.5*. ··*

RAPPORT SUR LAPPLICATION OEL'ARTICLE 6
DES ACCORDS AMF (SORTIE DUPANIER ) 
1.Limitations envigueur
~ ! ιI ~Niveau de ITaui^pe IRéférenceslimitation |croiaS&nce |RèglementCatégorie Etat (s)
membre (s)
concerné(s )Pays tiers visé !linîtê Seuil de
sortie
21
21
21
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
2*
25
25
25
26
26
26
26F
F
X
F
BNL
BNL
F
-F-■
BNL
BNL
F
BNL
F
BNL
«S#Thaïlande
Inde
Chine
Roumanie
Roumanie
Malaisie
Chine
Philippines
Philippines
Chine
Pakistanais
Thailad& .
Chine
Thaïlande
Thaïlande
Thaïlande
Corée1000p . 78
120
97
22
12
12
■.#1 41
33
19
97
43
20
43
47
72
*14
50
42680*¥
980
160
200
250 -
140
335
222
180
278
100
150
170
370
300 .6X
6X
6X
5X
2X
6X
6X
6X
6X
6X
6X
6X
6X
6X
6/5X•JOL60LU6.3.81
JOL149 DU18.6.79
JOL229 DU11.9.79
JOL117 DU8.5.80
JOL238 DU11.9.80
6X JOL281 DU10.11.79
4X JOL281 DU10.11.79
4X JOL325 OU21.12.79 ,

RAf^RT SURL'APPLICATION DEL'ARTICLE 6
DES ACCORDS AHF (SORTIE DUPANIER )
■#
1.Limitations envigueur
26
26
27
27
27
25
29
29*
29
29
30A
30A
30A
31Catégorie Etat (s)
membre Cs)
concerné(s )
26 DK
26 BNL
26 *f
I ·
26Λ
F
26 I BNL
26 BNL
UK
CEE
DK -
UK
UK
UK
X
F
UK
1RL
~bnl "
FPays tiers visé IUnité Seuil de
sortie
Corée
Malaisie
Paki stan
Singapour
Brésil
Hongrie
Thailande
Thai lande
Thailande
Thailande
Pakistan
Singapour ^
Roumanie
Macao
Philippines
"Roumanie
Inde
Chine
Taiwan1000p . 12
50
111
89
.63
50
kr558Niveau de
liaitationTaux de."55*
>Références
croissarcgrl Règlementcroissa^^ I
8
71
89
16
5,4
7
10
0/5
26
57
47
137140
145 o
300v#'
-è5
170
230
1850
83 ■
.252
325
312
.50
198
50
10
175
220
100
25041
6X
6X
6X
5X
5X
6X
6X
6X-
6X
6X
4X
4X
4X
4X
6X
5X
6X
6X
6XJOL325 DU21.12.79
JOL17 DU23.1.80
JOL6DU10.1.80
JO L24 DU31.1.80
JOL22 DU29.1.80
JOL76 DU22.3.80
JOL279 DU23.10.80
JOL 132 LU19.5.81 ,
-401 281 DU10.11.79
JOL279 DU23.10.80
JOL281 DU.25.10.80
JOL149 DU18.6.79
JOL149 DU18.6.79 .
JOL110 DU2V .4.80
JOL249 DU20.9;80
V*–JOL233 OU4.9.80 - ,
/ . .•*» '\VV . •*' V».f%

/RAPPORT SUR LAPPLICATION DEL'ARTICLE 6
DES ACCORDS AMF (SORTIE OUPANIER )
r1«Limitations envigueur
1'
•
ι ;Catégorie Etat (s)
nembre(s )
concernées )Pays tiers visé Unité Seuil de
sortieNiveau da
.imitationTaux^croi*$ïhceRéférences
Règlement
1
! 31 CEE Macao * 1000p . 8 83 61 JOL281 OU10.11.79
1 31 UK Chine ··tf206
^60°V 1806X JO L267 DU10.10.80
32
•35CEE.
IHong Kong
Taiwantomes
·· "·1095
566X
4XJO L212 DU20.8.79
JOL306 DU15.11.80
36 F Chineη58 6X
37 I Thai landem•203 · 2200 4X JO4.169 DU7.7.79
, 37 I Bulgarie99#205
230
284450 5X< ■
iJ
¡
\39
.-« ··...
41
MF
.I
f -Roumanie .
Taiwan
Taiwan --■·99"J90
550
480–5X
6X
Ï_ 6%–JOL149 DU18.6.79
JOL229 DU11.9.79
JOL85 DU29.3.80 -
!
» 46
•CEE Argentine991502 7834 8X JOL212 _DU20.8.79 .
ï* 46 ' CEE Brésil .991877 7613 SX JO L225 DU5.9.79
i
ï46 UKUruguay^99353 580 .17,5X•
1
1
î
'}46
50_I
UKUruguad^
Ar^^ine
l/^bguay ... .M
M225
434452
2306X
~8X~"JOL249 DU3.10.79
JOL149 DU18.6.79 ~
1 50 Utf9943 165 7X JOL93 OU10.4.80
·;50-· --
•BNL · Uruguay .·-·99 19 140 · 7%-·-JO L93-DIM 0.4.80
i 62 CoréeH'32 530 ~ 6X •
64 Pologne9920 48 uniqueirent 1981
·.*·
68 Inde
• .M*/5 .30 6/5X JOL149 DU18.6.79 :V .*-*· ·
. "·--.1.·*·■-.
".· ··-*>' '

RAPPORT SURL'APPLICATION DEL'ARTICLE 6
DES ACCORDS AMF (SORTIE DUPANIER )
1.Limitations envigueur
•Catégorie Etat(s )
eenbreCs )
concernées .)Pays tiers visé Unité Seuil de
sortieNiveau de
limitationTaux^^p
croi^jnceRéférences
Règlement
63 CEE Hong Kong ; tonne 18 554 6X JOL24DU31.1.80
68 F MacaoH14 80v^
4^506X
6» BNL * Roumanie 1'000p. 19 JOL272 DU30.10.79 - ■--
69 F CoréeM41 6X •
71 υκ Philippines tonnes 11 36 6X JOL17DU23.1.80
71 IRL PhilippinesM• 1 3 6X JOL17DU23.1.80
73 CEE Taiwan 1000p .J*
ÊT 25
851049 · 4X JOL40 DU15.2.79
-73
73BNL·
.UK *Roumanie
Thaïlande "120
2602X
6XJOL 229 DU11.9.79
JOL279 DU23.10.80 *
73 -.....Du:.... Macao ■ •11 95 --– ·6X –
73 BNL Thailand «•I38 265 6X
•# '
73 *' DK Thaïlande
Macao^
Chine^^
Sic^sfcour«11 150 6X
73
73
74'CEE
UK
IRL*»·
η
M361
106
1785
190
176X
6X
~6X JOL298 DU7.11.80
78 CEE Taïwan · · tonnes 222 2334 4X * JOL85DU29.3.80 :■·
73l81 CEE · Hong KongM
H*550 6634 . 6X-·–JO-L -204 DU6.8.80 -··
78 «CS~ Hong Kong 300 3554' * 6X JOL204 DU6.8.80
#78
78 ^BNLMacao
MacaoH
H
474
42130
806X
6X*
»
• I

RAPPORT SUR L*APPLICATION DEL'ARTICLE 6
DES ACCORDS ANF (SORTIE DUPANIER )
1»Limitations envigueur
#
Catégorie Etat(s ) Pays tiers visé
membre (s)
concerné(s )
79 BNL Hong Kong'
79 BNL· Taiwan
80 UK Philippines
80 IRL Philippines
80 UK Pakistan
81 CEE Corée
81 CEE Macao
* 82 CEE Hong Kong ·
83 .CEE Taiwan
83 - BNL -- Roumanie ··
89
91 T
100
109_F
BNL
UK
FMalaisie
Pologn^^
Cor^
Kong
- ««W Λ
•»Λ·*
/■•
•Unité Seuil de
sortieNiveau de
limitationTaux de
croissanceRéférences
Règlement
tonnes 0,5
0,42
12
5.
16
&0
1000p .
tonnes35
191
27-
229
30
120
9110
13
115
2343
788
963
892
•– 9*
2700
190
1000
1266%
6X
6X .
6X
6X
6X
,6X
6X
6X*
6X-–
5,5X
5X
.6X
6XJOL110 DU29*4.80
JOL16 DU21.1.80
JOL16DU21.1.80
JOL24 DU31.1.80
JOL330 DU6.12.80
JOL99DU27.4.80
JOL.203 DU5.8.80
JOL325 DU21.12.79
Ο'

PAYS PARTENAIRES VISES PAR LES SORTIES DEPANIER
«
PAYS CATEGORIES ETATS MEMBRE CONCERNE
W Argentine 46 CEE
5.0 UK
Brésil 3'■ UK
Vt 7 UK
%
"%Bulgarie ^26
46
37•ML
CEE
I
Chine
ff18 . 'I
ft
It
ft
ff\ 21
%21UK
ENL
tf 21 I
tf
tf
tf
tf24
24%
%F
ENL
« 25 BNL
tf 3OA I
tt
tf
ff31
36
73%%
UKφ·BNL ~Corée 13
1» 20 UK
II
»
«26
26BNL
DK\
II
tt62
69Ρ
Ρ%
tt 81 CEE
II 100 UK

-2-
PAYS PARTENAIRES VISES PAR LES SORTIES DEPANIER
\PAYS CATEGORIES ETATS MEMBRE CONCERNE
Egypt
Hon
Hon
Indegrie^J .
SKong
Indonésie4
'9;
20
20
1
1
11
14B
26\ 32% 68
y?8 +8132
68
\o%%(sous plafond 78)
79
82
109 <
6
6
6
17
17
17
21
21
25
30A
68
6ïfeUK
UK
UK
ML
I
ML
F
UK
ML
CEE
CEE
CEE
CEE
ML
CEE
F
UK
ML
I
aML
ML^
F
F
F
I
CEE%

PAYS PARTENAIRES VISES PAR LES SORTIES DEPANIER
PAYS CATEGORIES ETATS MEMBRE CONCERNE
Indonésie
MaCcSfc
If
l»
t»
tf%Χ%
ft
If
tf
Malasie
Pakistan
tt
tf
h
ii
tf
Philippines
ff
tf
If
It
tf
It
tf
tt8
8
8
8
10
11
11
29
V"
78
78
79
11
24
26
89
11
11
20
25
26
27
80
6
8
12
13
16
17
21%
%UK
F
I
IRL
F
UK
F
F
CEE
F
CEE
F
ML
CEE
F
BNL
ML
F
F
%7:
F
UK
UK
CEE
CEE
ML
CEE
IRL
UK
CEE\X

PAYS PARTENAIRES VISES PARLESSORTIES DEPAHTER
PAYS CATEGORIES ETATS MEMBRE CONCERNE
Philippines
ti
Pologne
Roumanie
ff
ff
n
tt
fi
ti
M
ff
Singapour
ff
if
Sri Lanka\%24
24 .
29
71
71
80
80
17
64
91
21
24
24
29
30A
39
69
73
83
26
28
74
21%
1%F
ML
IRL
UK
IRL
UK
IRL
UK
UK
ML
ML
I
F
BNL
I
BNL
F
BNL
ML
%%
UKUKm /yf
UK
%%

PAYS PARTENAIRES VISES PAR LES SORTIES ESPANIER
PAYS CATECORIES ETATS MEMBRE CONCETÙJjS
Thaïlande 10
21UK
CEE
25 CEE
tt
ft
Vf
tt
Uruguay
tt
tt%> 26% 27^27
37
73
73
46
46
50
50CEE
DK
UK
I
ML
DK
UK
I
UK
ML
ML
UK
UK
I
I
F
CEE
CEE
ML
CEE1
Taiwan
tf
«t
tt
tt
tt
ft15B
15B
29
31
35
41
41
73
78
79
83%>X

Will bedistributed separately
SUPPLEMENTARY ANNEX\to
the Commission Report tothe -Council onthe results
ofthe commercial policy decisions taken in1977
inthetextile sector
%
Statistician Community trade intextile and^ /Othing products
1977 -1978 -1979 -1980
% >%\
%X
%%%