ARCHIVESHISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(77)83
Vol.1977/0032

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement(CEE,Euratom)n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernantl'ouvertureaupublicdesarchiveshistoriquesdelaCommunauté économique
européenneetdelaCommunautéeuropéennedel'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement(CE,Euratom)n°1700/2003du22septembre2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003,p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiésconformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
InaccordancewithCouncilRegulation(EEC,Euratom)No354/83of1February1983
concerningtheopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropeanEconomic
CommunityandtheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunity(OJL43,15.2.1983,p.1),as
amendedbyRegulation(EC,Euratom)No1700/2003of22September2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003,p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary,classifieddocumentsinthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformitywithArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung(EWG,Euratom)Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar1983überdieFreigabederhistorischen ArchivederEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung(EG,Euratom)Nr.1700/2003vom22.September2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003,S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeitzugänglich.Soweit
erforderlich,wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenanntenVerordnungfreigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
r
COM(77)83final. *
Brussels.18March1977.
REPORTONRELATIONS WITHNON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (NGOs)
ACTIVEINTHEFIELDOFDEVELOPMENT ,WITHSPECIALREFERENCE TO
THECOFINANCING OFPROJECTS.
Commission communication totheCouncil
LJ.av.\w__Ji1 r_!■■tum#/sVA /•>/
CCM(77)83final

CONTENTS
Page
I.INTRODUCTION 1
II.COFINANCING PROJECTSWITHNGOs 2
1.Cofinancing procedures 2
2.Analysisoftheprojects 2
3.ImprovementoftheGeneralConditions 4
4»Otherprospect*forimprovingthecofinancing
system 4
5.Involvementoftheauthoritiesofthe 5
recipientcourfries
6.Supervision andevaluationofcofinanced
projects 6
III.DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 6
IV.COORDINATION OFRELATIONSWITHNGOsANDTHE*'6
FUNCTIONING OFTHELIAISONCOMMITTEE
V.CONCLUSION 7

AWEXI
Reportof"theinformation meetingbetweenrepresentatives ofthe
governmentsoftheMemberStatesresponsibleforrelationswith
NC03workingindevelopment andCommissionstaff.
Brussels-26November1976
TableI:SummaryofprojectsbyMemberState
TableII:SummaryofNGOprojectsat31December1976
TableIII:Breakdownofcofinancedprojectsbyrecipientcountry
TableIVsClassification ofprojectsapprovedin1976
TableV:Breakdown(byHTGO)ofprojectsapprovedin1976

REPORTONRELATIONSWITHNON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (NGOs)ACTIVE
INTHEFIELDOPDEVELOPMENT ,WITHSPECIALREFERENCE TOTHECOFINANCING
OFPROJECTS
(CommissionCommunication totheCouncil)
I.INTRODUCTION
1.In1976forthefirsttimetheCommunitybudgetincludedanappropriation
(item938)forthecofinancingofoperationalprojectsinthedeveloping
countriescarriedout"bynon-governmental organizations oftheMemberStates
oftheCommunity.
Itismainlyonthislevelthattherehasbeenrealand collaboration
overthelastfewmonthsbetweenNGOsandtheCommission.Atthesametime,
contactshavecontinuedinotherfieldsofinteresttoNGOs,particularly the
awakeningofpublicopinion,intermsofthetrendinrelationsbetweenthe
developingcountriesandtheindustrialized countries.Thedevelopmentof
relationswithNGOsfitsintothistrend,whichmakesitdesirablethatnon­
governmentalcirclesbecomemoreinvolvedindevelopmentpolicy.
2.Theconsultations betweentheCouncilandtheCommissiononthecofinancing
ofprojectsandtheutilizationofthisappropriation werecontinuedin1?76.
ItshouldbenotedherethatthePresidentoftheCouncil,atthemeetingon
8April1976,notedtheCommission'sCommunication onthebasicguidelines
forrelationsbetweentheCommunityandtheNGOsinthefieldofdevelopment .
TheCouncilbodiesexaminedtheproceduresandGeneralConditionsforcofinancingcontractswithNGOs.TheCommissionalsopresentedtheCouncilwithannterim
ftsportonthecofinancingofprojects.withNGOs asatJuly1976:
thisreportwasupdatedinOctober1976.Lastly,abriefingsessionwasheld
on26November1976fortheMemberStates'nationaldepartmentsresponsible
forrelationswithNGOsandtheCommissionduringwhichtherewasafruitful,
exchangeofviewsonanumberofquestionsconcerningcooperationwithNGOs.
3»Followinguptheabovetasksandcontacts,thisCommunication concernsthe
utilizationofthebudgetappropriationforcofinancingcontractswithNGOs
and,inamoregeneralvein,thetrendofrelationswiththeNGOsinother
importantspheres,notablyDevelopmentEducation,andthecoordinationofthoserelations.
COM504finalof6October1975(CouncilDocumentS/l373/75)
CommissionworkingpaperSEC/76/H63of19MarchI976(CouncilDocumentS/573/76of1AugustI976) '
CommissionworkingpaperSEC(76)287oof19July1976(s/l252of28July1976)
SeeAnnexIattached

-2-
II.COPINANCTNG PROJECTS WITH NC-Os
C°^nanc ^-ngprocedures
1.1Cofinancing actually started after theCouncil (Development )meeting on
8April 1976 referred toabove .
Theprocedures followed arebased ontheGeneral Conditions forcofinanc -
ingcontracts ,which ,itshould heremabered ,had "been prepared in
cooperation with representatives ofNGOs andofthegovernment "bodies
oftheMember States that hadexperience inthematter ,before being
examined bytheCouncil .
Extensive information onthese procedures wasthen Bent toNGOs ofthenine
Member States .
TheGeneral Conditions determine thecriteria forselecting theNGOs and
theprojects ,andlaydown that ,asaninitial experiment ,theCommunity 's
financial contribution mayamount to50%ofthecost oftheprojects
presented bytheNGOs .Itmaynot exceed loo000u.a .perproject .
1.2TheNGOs reacted very positively tothecofinancing opportunities offered
tothem .Inless than eight months ,they submitted atotal of121projects ,
94ofwhich were admissible andregistered onthebasis oftheGeneral
Conditions under the1976 budget .Ofthe94projects registered ,
76projects presented by33NGOs from eight Member States were approved ,
foratotaj amount of25°°000u.a.,i.e. ,fortheentire appropriationallocated .
Since theapplications submitted bytheNGOs exceed theavailable appro­
priations ,certain projects will betaken into consideration under the
1977 budget 5these include theDanish applications which were submitted
late andintheform ofdraft projects .
1.3Cofinancing contracts have been drawn upfor46ofthe76projects approved ,
andthese 46have been wholly orpartially paid for ,thetotal sumbeing
785805u.a .Thepayment procedures will becarried outinthenormal way
during 1977 *
1.4Among the121projects submitted bytheNGOs ,only twelve were inadmissible
owing totheir falure toconform totheGeneral Conditions .Some were
amended accordingly orwithdrawn bytheNGOs ,which have shown aclear
grasp ofthespirit andletter oftheGeneral Conditions .
Another fifteen projects ,which were notregistered in1976 owing tolack
ofappropriations ,were carried over to1977 •
2.Analysisoftheprojects
Adetailed analysis oftheprojects istobefound inthefive tables
attached tothis Communication .This analysis confirms thetrends described
intheabovementioned Interim Report andcalls forthefollowing comments :
The94projects canbebroken
-76projects approved
-3withdrawn bytheNGO
-5withdrawn after appraisal
-2inabeyance
-8carried over to1977 .down asfollows :
•L*

-3-
2.1Thecontentoftheprojectsreflectsthediversityof"boththeneedsof
thedevelopingcountriesandtheEuropeanNGOs.
Thefinancialassistancerequestedvariesfrom"j8otolooooou.a.and
isintendedforprojectsrangingfromthepurchaseofsmallitemsof
auxiliaryequipmenttointegratedruraldevelopmentprojectscomprising
production,trainingandsocialinfrastructure inthecontextofagri­
culturalcooperatives .
Therecipientsareoftentheleastfavouredruralcommunitiesandmore
rarelytheneglectedurbanareaswithinandaroundlargetowns.These
peopleactivelyparticipateintheimplementation andadministration of
theprojectsinvolvingthem,ifnotintheiractualconception.
2.2Therecipientcountriesaresituatedinallthedevelopingregionsofthe
world.Experiencehasshownthatanydevelopingcountrymayhaveaccess
tocofinancingundertheconditionsatpresentlaiddown,andthisex­
periencemay"bereinforcedwithregardtopotentialrecipentsinthefuture.
2.3TheEuropeanNGOswhichparticipatedincofinancingin1976represent
differentphilosophical ,politicalorsocialtendencies ;theyalsovary
widelyinsize,asregardstheiroperating "budget,thegeographical area
whichtheycoverorthediversityoftheiractions.
Thismeansthattheprimeimportanceattachedtothequalityoftheprojects
undertheapprovalproceduresmakesitpossibletogiveaccesstoNGOsand
toselectprojectsonaperfectlyobjectivebasisjtheGeneralConditions
arethereforesatisfactory fromthatpointofview.
2.4Theanalysisofthisfirstyear'sexperiencealsoconfirmscertain
omissionsandshortcomings intheGeneralConditionsalreadyreferredto
intheabovementioned InterimReport:themainsuchfailingsmaybe
describedasfollows:
-thelimitationinprincipleoftheCommunitycontributionto5°%
totalcostoftheprojectisoneofthemainreasonsforwhichalarge
numberoftheJSapprovedprojectsareonasmallscale,thefinancial
contribution requestedfromtheCommunitybeinglessthan3oooou.a.
Theneedforarelativelyhighcontribution fromtheirownfundspresents
theEuropeanNGOswithaproblemandthishasoftenmadeitimpossible
forthemtosubmitlarger-scaleprojects,whichareoftenthemost
worthwhile .
-thepresentbudgetaryrulespreventtheCommunityfromenteringinto
commitmentsregardingNGOmulti-annualprojects.
-theCommunitycontributestowardsthefinancingof"volunteers"only
forcarryingoutprojectsinsituintherecipientcountries.Thismeans,forexample,thatthecostsrelatingtovolunteershavetobeborne
entirelybytheNGOwhereitisamatteroftrainingtheminEurope,etc.
Thesematterswillbedealtwithinsection3. '

-4-
ImprovementoftheGeneralConditionsin1977
TheCommissionservicesdiscussedtheabovementioned shortcomings andomissions
onseveraloccasionswiththeCouncil expertsfromtheMemberStates1
GovernmentsresponsibleforrelationswiththeNGOs,andtheNGOsthemselves.
Itwasseenthattherewasnodivergenceofopinionastotheadvisatilityof
improvingtherulesinforcein1977,inparticularwithregardtothefollow­
ingpoints:
3.1TheCommunitycontribution maycoverupto75$thetotalcostofthe
projectsundercertainconditions,namely:
-projectsofundeniablemerit,whichtheNGOshowstobeimpossibleto
implementwithoutaCommunitycontributionof75$>
-projectswhichmustbeimplementedunderparticularlydifficultconditions;
-projectsforwhichthepossibilities ofalocalcontribution areminimal,
inparticularinthepoorestcountries.
Inexceptionalcases,theCommunitycanalsomakeuseofthepossibilityof
cofinancingwiththeGovernmentofaMemberStateorwithaninternational
organization orofCommunityfinancinginordertocoveralmostallthe
costofaprojectforwhichtheresponsible NGOwouldnothaveown
resources .
3.2Acontribution towardsthecostsrelatingtovolunteers mayalsobe
decidedupon,onacasebycasebasisandaspartofoperationalprojects.
Thesecostscouldcoverforexample,thepostingofvolunteersand
theirtraininginEuropeorelsewhere,inconjunctionwithprojects.The
trainingofvolunteersisbecomingincreasingly importantinthecontextof
theimplementation ofprojectsotherthancharityprojects.Itisunderstood
moreover,thatthisisnotanothermethodoffinancingtraineesorscholar-
ship-holdersoutsidetheexistingoperatingframework.However,itshould
benotedinthisrespectthattheCommissionwillnotbeableinthe
immediatefuturetoprovideassistanceforvolunteerprogrammesassuch,
relatingtotheselectionandassignmentofvolunteersandthetermsof
theircontracts.InmostoftheMemberStates,theseprogrammesarethe
subjectofspeciallegalprovisionstouchingonemployment,socialsecurity
endexpatriation .Apreliminaryexamination mustbemadeofthepossibility
ofcoordinating theseprovisionsatCommunitylevel.
Theimprovements describedabovearesimplytheextension,atCommunitylevel,
ofprovisionswhich,atnationallevel,theMemberStates'Governments-as
inmostotherindustrialized countries-arealreadysuccessfully applying.
4*Otherprospectsforimprovingthecofinancingsystem
4.1Forthereasonsdescribedabove,itisdesirablefortheCommunitytotake
partinthemulti-annual projectsandprogrammesorganizedbytheNGOs
whichareamongthemostworthwhilefromthepointofviewofprofitability .
However,undertheCommunity'spresentbudgetaryrules,itcannotcommit
itselfotherthanonanannualbasis.Forthatreason,theCommissionhad
proposed,inthe1977draftbudget,thatadistinctionshouldbedrawn
betweenappropriations forcommitmentandappropriations forpaymentso
thatagivenbudgetarycommitmentcouldbehonouredoveraperiodoftwo
ofthreeyears.

-5-
AsatisfactorysolutionmaybefoundtotheproblemiftheCounciltakes
adecisiontothateffectunderthe1978"budget.
4.2TheCommissionservicesarealerttothepossibilities whichmayarisein
thefutureforlinkingcertainNGOmeasuresforwhichtheCommunityprovidesassistancewithotherCommunitymeasures(foodaid-EDF-otherspecific
orspecialmeasures).
Suchpossibilities mayarisefromthecomplementary natureofmeasures
takenbytheNGOswithregardtomeasurestakenbygovernmentauthorities.
Inthisrespectitmayberecalledthat,forthefirsttimein1976,
theCommunityfoodaidprogrammereserved,underspecialconditions,a
quotaof12oootofskimmedmilkpowderforNGOsofthenineMemberStates
whichdistributesuchaid.TheChairmanoftheNGOLiaisonCommitteeacts
asintermediary betweentheCommissionandtheNGOsconcernedinoperations
relatingtothisaid.
4.3Furthermore ,thiscomplementary aspectisalreadyseenincertainNGO
projectscofinancedbytheCommunity,withregardtowhichtheinterest-
eventheinitiative-ofthegovernmentsoftherecipientcountriesis
obvious.Inthiscontextitmaythereforebeconfirmedthaithereare
increasingprospectsfortriangularcollaboration betweenNGOs,
Governments andtheCommunity.
4.4Atthepresentstage,theCommunityundertakescofinancingonlythrough
NGOswhichareconcernedwithdevelopmentcooperation andareofEuropean
origin,i.e.,establishedintheMemberStates;thisprocedurewouldseemto
providethebestguaranteesofeffectiveness forthisnewformofcontrib­
utiontowardsdevelopment.Anexaminationshould,however,bemadeinthe
futureoftheextenttowhichotherspecificEuropeanNGOs,suchastrade
oryouthorganizations ,couldbeinvolvedintheseoperations.
Furthermore ,ithasemergedthatEuropeanNGOsthemselveshaveworkinglinks
witheitherthelargeinternational NGOsorwiththenationalNGOsinthe
developingcountriesinwhichtheyoperate,orwithNGOsinother
industrialized countries.Theseoverlapscannotbutcontributetowardsthe
growingeffectiveness ofthemeasuresundertakenbytheNGOs,without
makingthemlosetheirEuropeancharacter.
Itshouldbenoted,however,thatthenon–CommunityNGOsareseekingmore
andmoretoestablishdirectcontactswiththeCommunitywithregardto
cofinancing .
5*Involvementoftheauthoritiesoftherecipientcountries
5.1TheNGOshaveobservedtheprovisioncontainedintheGeneralConditions
whichstatesthattheprojectssubmittedforcofinancingmustbeapproved
bytherelevantauthoritiesintherecipientcountries.Thisdoesnotmean
thattheprojectsinquestionareautomatically putbeforetheGovernments
ofthecountriesconcernedortheirdiplomaticmissionsaccreditedtothe
Community,particularlyiftheyarefairlyminorprojects.
Forthisreason,theCommissionintendstotransmitacopyofthisreport
forinformationpurposestothemissionsoftherecipientcountriesin
Brussels,andtotheACPSecretariat.

-6-
6.Supervisionandevaluationofthecofinancedprojects
ThefirstpaymentsoftheCommunitycontributions weremadeinAugust1976*
TheNGOsconcernedarerequiredtosubmittheirimplementation report,
coveringtheaccountssixmonthsafterthepayments,i.e.,fromFebruary1977.
Theproceduresforsupervising andevaluatingtheprojectscanthus"be
initiatedatthattime.
III.DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION
InthecontextoftheCommunity'srelationswiththeNGOs,theCommissionhas
alreadydiscoveredaparticularproblema^regardscollaborationwiththeNGOs
whichspecializeinDevelopnent Education.Inadditiontocarryingoutprojects
indevelopingcountries,anumberofmajorNGOsplayanactivepartinawakening
publicopinionwithregardtodevelopment.
TheNGOsurgethattheCommunityshouldcontributetowardssuchefforts.Someof
themalreadycollaborate withtheCommissionintheinformationfield.
Educationactivitiesassumeanimportantdimensioninthecontextofthedevelop­
mentofrelationsbetweenindustrialized countriesanddevelopingcountries,and
theincreasingeffortsbeingmadeasairesultwithintheCommunity,involving
alleconomicandsocialcircles.
Consequently ,theCommissionintendstopursuethedialoguewiththeNGOson
thismatter,andtoholdaspecialseminaronitinthenextfewmonths,takingintoaccounttheCouncil's(Development )concernwiththepossibilities of
goingbeyondandsupplementing theusualmethodsofinformingthepublicand
alsothefavourableattituderecentlyindicatedbytheCouncilandatthe
abovementioned meetingwiththerepresentatives oftheMemberStates'Govern­
mentsresponsibleforrelationswiththeNGOs.
TheCommission'sobjectivewillthereforebetofindmethodsofcollaboration
basedoncompromisebetween,ontheonehand,theautonomyandthediversity
oftheNGOsand,ontheotherhand,theEuropeanp&iticaltrend,andtostudyin
depththepossibilities forcofinancinginthissphere.
IV.COORDINATION OFRELATIONS WITHTHENGOsANDTHEFUNCTIONING OFTHELIAISON
COMMITTEE
1.InordertomaintaincloserelationswiththeNGOs,toreviewatregular
intervalstheobjectivesandmethodsofcollaboration andtoenabletheNGOsto
expresstheirviewsdirectlyontheguidelinesadopted,theCommissionorganizes
anannualNGOAssembly.
AboutfiftyNGOrepresentatives areinvitedtothisAssemblyonthebasisof
theirpersonalexperience,andhavingregardtothebalancerequiredbetween
varioustendenciesandnationalities .Theworkofthemeetingrelatestoall
themattersconcerningtheNGOs:cofinancing ,education,volunteers,foodaid;
theresultsoftheworkbeingcirculatedtotheNGOsintheMemberStates.
oeetheabovementioned InterimReportbytheCommission
of19July1976(S/1252A6)-WorkingpaperSEC2870

-7-
2.AttheAssemblyheldinJanuary197°»"theNGOssetupanad'hocLiaisonCommittee
madeupoftwelvepeopleandresponsibleforfacilitating contactswiththe
Commissionandamongthemselves.ThisCommitteemetseveraltimesandhas
provedausefulinnovation.TheCommissionshouldthereforesupportthis
Committeeinitsdiverseandintricatecoordination work.
TheCommitteewasrenewedattheAssemblyof19-21January1977•TheSecretariat
ofthisCommitteepresentsaparticularproblem.SincetheCommitteeismade
uponavoluntarybasis,thecostsarisingfromtheworkandthesecretarial
dutiesdevolveupontheNGOswhichdelegatetheirrepresentatives tothe
Committee }asaresult,theseNGOsbearexpenditure fromwhichalltheNGOa
concernedandtheCommunitybenefitandcertainsecretarialdutiesandsome
oftheworkofcoordination amongNGOscannotbecarriedoutatpresentowing
totheextracostandworkinvolvedforthosedelegates.Thiscoordination is
oftheutmostimportanceforalltheNGOsandfortheCommunity.
Inordertosolvethisproblem,theCommissionisatpresentexaminingthe
mostsuitablemeansofcoveringthesecostsandenablingalltheNGOsto
benefitfromcollaboration withtheCommunitythroughacommonsecretariat ,*
thissecretariatwillcontributetowardstheorganizedandsustainedcoordina-
'tionoftheNGOsofthenineMemberStatesandoftheprojectswhichare
cofinanced .
V.CONCLUSION
1.TheCommunity'scollaboration withtheNGOs,whichhasbeenoperativeinthe
sphereofdevelopmentforoneyear,isdevelopinginaverypositiveway.
Furthermore ,asnon-governmental circlesbecomemoreandmoreinvolvedinthe
Community'sdevelopmentpolicy,thecollaboration withtheNGOswillbe
requiredtoassumenewdimensions.
2.Uptonow,thiscollaboration istakingshapemainly-andsuccessfully-in
thesphereofthecofinancingofprojectsforwhichtheNGOsareresponsible
inthedevelopingcountries.TherapidandeffectivereactionoftheNGOsto
thisnewformofcollaboration reflectsthewelcomewhichitreceivedfromthe
non–governmental circlesconcernedintheMemberStatesandtheextentofthe
needsofthedevelopingcountries.
Inthiscontext,theproposedamendmentstotheGeneralConditionsfor
cofinancingprojectsshouldprovesatisfactoryintheimmediatefutureand
thereforeshouldnolongerraiseanyproblem(seeSectionII,par.3)jthese
amendmentscomprise :
-theraisingoftheCommunitycontributionto75%ofthecostofthe
projectincertaincases;
-themakingofaCommunitycontributiontowardscertaincostsrelatingto
volunteersinvolvedinoperationalprojects.
Inthissamecontext,thetakingoverbytheCommunitybudgetofthesecretarial
costsoftheLiaisonCommitteeisunderexaminationbutshouldnotcreateany
problem,sincethesecostsareminimalcomparedwiththeadvantagestobe'
derivedfrompropercoordinationofthecofinancedprojectsandoftheNGOsthemselves (SectionIV,par.2).

-8-
Theapplicationofcofinancingprocedurestomulti-annual projectsand
programmeswill,however,necessitatetheCouncil's(Budget)intervention :to-
that$nd,theCommissionrecallsitsproposaltotheCouncilfortheintro­
ductionofadistinction "betweenappropriations forpaymentandappropriations
forcommitmentintherelevant "budgetaryitem(SectionII,par.4*1•)•
3.Aspaitoftheextensionofcollaboration withtheNGOstootherfields,
developmenteducation (SectionIII)isconsidered "bytheCommissionto
"beamatterforpriority,anditwilldulyinformtheCouncilofthei-.'ogress
oftheworkonthismatter.
4.Otherimprovements may"beintroducedinthelightoftheworkwhichthe
Commissionintendstoundertake,inparticularinthefollowingfields:
-linkingofNGOacitivieswithotherCommunityactivitiesrelatingto
development ,orwithotherinternational ,bilateralornationalactivities(SectionII,par.4*2*).
-coordination of,andparticipation in,actualNGOvolunteerprogrammes
(selection,contractualobligations ,assignment,etc.)(SectionII,
par.3*^*)*
5*Finally,innotingthepositivedevelopmentofCommunityrelationswiththe
IfGOs,theCommissionwishestostressthatthisdevelopment washelpedby
thepragmaticapproachandthesupportoftheCouncil,theEuropeanParliament
andtheirservices.
ItisconvincedthatcontinuedclosecontactbetweentheCommissionservices
withthoseinstitutions andwiththedepartmentsdirectlyconcernedinthe
MemberStatesisthemostsuitablemeansofmakingprogressinthismatter
inthefuture;italsotakesfullaccountofthepragmaticworkingprocedures
oftheNGOsthemselves .

FINANCIAL ANNEX
Thiscommunication doesnotinvolveanyextra
expenditure ontheCommunityBudget.

ANNEX 1.
/*>
Report oftheinformation meeting between representatives
ofthegovernments oftheMember States responsible
forrelations with NGOs working indevelopment and Commission staff
Brussels .26November 1976
INTRODUCTION
1. Thepurpose ofthis meeting wasthat both theMember States depart­
ments and the services ofthe Commission concerned would benefit from the
sharing ofeach other 'sexperience inthematter ofcooperation with NGOs in
thearea ofdevelopment policy .Inparticular ,themeeting would provide the
opportunity toreview thebasic problems ,both inthedeveloping countries
asintheCommunity^of cooperation with NGOs .
Inthis framework itwasrecalled that ftodate ,Commission contacts
inNGOmatters hadbeen largely with theCouncil 'sinstitutions ,particularly
with theCouncil 'sworking party ondevelopment .
2. Thedelegates andtheCommission representatives gave short exposes
ontheir relationships with NGOs under thefollowing headings :-general
contacts ,cofinancing ,development education ,food aid ,volunteers andTrade
unions .Themost salient elements under some ofthese headings areresumed
below .
COFINANCING OFNGO PROJECTS OVERSEAS
1. While theexperiences oftheMember ?tat^s varied from those ,like Ger
many andHolland ,whohadbeen operating schemes formore than 10years tothose
including theCommission ,whohad just begun ,there wasaremarkable similarity
inapproach (type ofproject cofinanced ,financial participation ,controls ,etc)
2. Ingeneral terms theMember States could goalong with theenvisaged
improvements intheCommission 'sGeneral Conditions particu^rly theincreasing
ofitscontribution to75$ofcosts incertain cases andthemove into mul^i-
anaual programming especially asmost ofthem operated onthese bases already .
•••/*••

-2-
3.SomedelegatesraisedthequestionastowhethertheCommission
maintainedalistofaccredited NGOsandsuggestedthatitonlysupport
thoseNGOswhichwererecogiised "bytheirownGovernmentsforsuchpurposes.
Inreplytherepresentative oftheCommissionstated,thatwhilenosuchlistwas
kept,eaohNGOsubmittinganapplication wascarefullyvettedinconformity
withtheoriterialaiddownintheGeneralConditionswhichstatethatthe
NGOhastobeanon-profitmakingorganisation asdefinedbylegislationin
aSfemberstateoftheCommunity.Aregularexchangeofinformation between
theMemberStatesservicesconcernedandtheCommission wouldhelptoavoid
anyprobleminthisregard.
III.DEV3L0PMENT EDUCATION
\
1.Again,whiletheirexperiences,operationsandemphasisdiffered,
thedelegationsagreedthatdevelopmenteducationwasbecomingmoreandmore
necessaryandthattheNG0*swereoftenwellplacedtoinfluencepublicopinion.
2.WelcomingtheCommission'sintentiontoorganiseaDevelopment
EducationseminarintheSpringof1977»theMemberStatesaskedtheCommission
toexercisecareinseleotingparticipants .Inparticulart/eywarnedofthe
dangersofhavingtheconvertedtalkingtotheconverted–theseminarwould
besuccesfulonlyifitproducedadialoguebetweenopposingideasandinterest
to,facegroupsandifitbroughttheN30*sface/withtherealitiesofthesituation.
Therepresentative oftheCommunitystatedthathewouldtakeintoconsideration
anyparticipants proposedbytheMemberStates.Needlesstosaythereportof
theseminarwouldalsobesenttothemforinformation .
IV.VOLUNTEERS .; ,
1.Therepresentative oftheCommissionexplainedthat,whilevolunteers
arealreadybeingsupportedwithintheframeworkofconcreteoperit.,U>.iJ.
projects,nodirectcofinancingofvolunteerprogrammesassuchhadyettaken
place.ReferringtotherecentCouncilofEuropeseminaronvolunteers,the
Commissionwasverymuchawareofhowcomplicatedthisareacouldbe.
t
/.../«..

-3-
TheCommissionservicesarenowexaminingthepossibleextension
ofitscofinancing schemeint'.isfield,andtheywould "beinterestedto
hearwhattheMemberStates,havingexperienceinthisarea,hadtosay*
2.Itappearsthat,inmostoftheMemberStates,volunteerstatus
andprogrammeshavealegalbasis.Whiletherewasgeneralencouragement for
theCommissiontocautiouslyextendtheschemetoincludevolunteers,a
numberofwarningsweresounded;adebateonthewholecfuestionofvolunteers
wascurrentlytalkingplacebothwithinandwithoutEurope,obviouslyany
resultofthisdebateshouldbereflectedinanyextensionoftheCommission
scheme.
V.FOODAID
TheCommissionsservicespointedoutthatforthefirsttimein
theCommunityfoodaidprogrammefor1976,aquotaof12.000tonsofskimmed
milkpowderhadbeenreservedforNGOsfromMemberStates.Nevertheless a
problemofcoordination existedimongNGO'sinterestedinthismatter.
VI.FOLLOWUP
Daringthecourseofthisfirstinformation meetingreferencewas
madebysomedelegationstotheneedforbettercoordination and/orharmoni­
sationinallaspeotsofNGOcooperation betweentheCommissionandthe
Memberspates.Whiledifferentdelegationsstresseddifferentaspectsofthe
matteritwasagreed,forthemoment,tomaintainthiscollaboration atthe
sameinformallevelasthecurrentmeeting.Whatwasmostmanifestwasthe
lackofinformationaboutoneanother'soperations.andtheCommission.
ItwasthereforesuggestedthattheCommissionservicescouldactasthe
centralagentsbetweenthemselvesandtheIfemberStatesdepartmentsfor:
a)exchangesofbasioinformation;and
b)periodioexchangesofinformationonoperationssuchascofinancingand
development education.
Asitwasfeltthatthemeetingitselfwasvexyuseful,theCommission
undertooktoorganiseasimilaroneinthenottoodistantfuturesothat
thecontactsestablishedasthinmeetingoouldbefurtherstrengthened and.
developed.

TABLESUMMARYOPPROJECTSBYKESffiERSTATE
li/y
memberstateNuraberofr
NGOsProject
Number
83registered 2
Contributions
requestedinu.a.Projectsn
Numberfotadopted3
Contributions
requestedinu.a.Pro,
Numberofi
NGOs~lectsapprc
Numberofj
projects>ved _;
l
Community |
commitment i
BELGIUM5 227.114,45
(ll.355.723FB)244.180,58 '
(2.209.029FB)56182.933,88 I
(9.146.694FB)i
!
1
DENMARK
η1^ ΛΟ Ι
FEDERALREFUBLIC
npr.RRMANY519949.192,36
(3.474.044 DM)2138.5?4,59
(507.000DM)5 17. tU.oy' :
(2.905.661
FRANCE616 463.963,07
(2.576.939F?)594.397,20
(524.300FF)6 11
I■ ■■309.50^,0° ;
!(2.052.628FF) !
I •%«/*^v-s1AO
IRELAND321 250.873,25
(£104.531,36)4104.842,17
(£43.684,59)3' 17 140♦UJX,UO ;
(£60.846,77/
__* –Λ
ITALY I4 9599.122,85 "
(374.451.781Lit)4'358.920 -
(224.325.000Lit)3.!5 228.755,oj
(142.972.394Lit) ;
1/ΑιΛΛ
LUXEMBOURG1 ? 48.6OO
(2.430.000Flux)1 34.600
(1.730.000Flux]1 i
r>l •vwv
j(700.000Flug)
F01Rc;c.c;77
–
NETHERLANDS38218.555,72
(Hfl791.171,70) L-Lo c«.JJJfIJ
(Hfl791.171,70 j
UNITEDKINGDOM711546.261,94
(l227.610,96)7U546.261,94 " ;
(£227.510,96)
TOTALS 34943.303.683,5518 775.464,543375
f 1'-j2.500,000 i
J-–– ;
SixprojectsfromtwoDanishNGOsweresubmittedlatein1976andwillbeconsideredm977.
Inaddition,12projectsfrom9M00bwerenotregisteredbecausetheydidnotconformtotheGensra.Condi..on
IncludingprojectswithdrawbytheHOC.,thoserejectedafterappraisalbytheCo^ssion-sdepartmentsa.dthoseheldoWto*7,

/1
TABLE II :
SUMMARY OPNGO PROJECTS REGISTERED BYTHECOMMISSION AT31DECEMBER 1976

SUMMARY OPNGOPROJECTS y^S
Project no. andNQOå ' 1 1■ 11 1 1
Brief description oftheprojectContribution requested
inu.a . !Contribution commitfced inu.a .I Remarks
OiVG/1/75(IRL)
CONCERNIrrigation system forthe fields ofthe
Babati agricultural college ,Tanzania .
Total cost s£12522.50£ 6.015 .-
14.436 !14.436 paid
,0NG/2/76(D)
DEUTSCHE WELT'HUNGER
?HILFE
t
*
î
4Various aspects ofrural development ,
inparticular training ,health andhelp
ingthepeople toruntheir ownaffair ^
bymeans oftheconstruction ofatrain­
ingcentre ,irrigation measures ,etc.,
Thailand .Total cost :DM253464 •126.732 DM
34.626.23 34.626,23First instalment of
13851u.a .paid
0NG/3/76(D) "
•DEUTSCHE WELTHUNGER
{HILFE
I
!Extension ofaState agricultural col­
lege bysetting upastock farming
centre (construction andequipment ),
Thailand
Total cost :DK320206160 .103 DM
43.74443.744
i
IFirst instalment of
17498u.a .paid .
jONG/4/76(D)
•DEUTSCHE WELTHUNGER
1HILFE
I
*Extension ofacooperative farme viath
construction ofwells ,land improvement
purchase oflive-stock ,etc.,India
Total cost jDMI84950sconst^c^n gM
i
! 25.266,391
! 25.266 ,39 paid
.ONG/5/76(D)
'DEUTSCHE WELTHUNGER
!HILPEPurchase ofagricultural equipment for :
:theNational Federation ofYoung Farme
Farmers' Clubs (Rural promotion centre )
Mauritius
;Total cost :M280350140.175 DM
38.299,1838.299,18paid
ONG/6/7S(D)
DEUTSCHE WELTHUNGER
HILFE|Purchase ofirrigation equipment (pumps
|etc,..)forthefarmers intheBarahona
province ,Dominican Republic
Total cost :DM807$46316.516 DM
I 86.479,7886.479,78First instelraent of
34592u.a .paid
I
!!
ι!

SUMMARYOFNGOPFjûJECT3
.i–c
Projectno.andNGO
-ONG/7/76(LUX)
ACTIONFORMATION DE
CADRESBriefdescriptionoftheproject Contribution requestedinu.a.Contribution comitted
._in_u.a.Remarks
Trainingofandequipmentof20farmer
groupleaders,Benin
iTotalcost!L.rr'b'r"jf4500001.730.000FLux
(34.600)•A Projectwithdrat:nbyIiGO
:ONG/8/76(?)
'SECOURSCATHOLIQUE
!Settingupofacooperativeforwashing !
andmarketingcoffee,inparticularthe
acquisitionofacoffeewashingplant
andahouseinwhichtoestablisha
branchoffice,andthepurchaseoftwo
lorriesfortransporting coffee,Haiti
Totalcost:FF330000165.000FF
(29.707,30 )29.707,30 •Paid
0Ν0/9/76(Β)
CENTREAIDEAUDÉVE­
LOPPEMENT DANSLA
LIBERTEETLEEÎOGREOConstruction ofananti-illiteracycentrenearOuagadougou ,Upper-Volta
Totalcost:Bfrs.1500000750.000FB
(15.000)- 11 1–
15.000
tPaid
ONG/lO/76(NL)
liNOVIB
i
γExtensionofanexistingprogrammefor
theelementaryeducationoforphans
(extensionofworkshops,etc*),Colom­
bia .
Totalcost:fl.64552Hfl22.549
(6.229-)6.229Paid
ONO/LL/76(IRL)
TR0CAIREAgriculturalinstructionmanualsapprop­
riatetotherequirements oftheregion
Swaziland
Totalcost:£3860£1.
(3.'00,-
003.600Paid
ONG/12/76(IRL)
TROCAIREBiucationofpeasantinstructorsinagr
culturaltechniquesandsocialdynamics
toimprovethesocialsituationin60
villages,Bolivia
Totalcosts£20000£5.000
(.12.000)12.000Paid
1
I ■■■ ""

SUMMARYOPNOOPROJECTS/Sp-
EROJECTno.andNGOi
IBriefdescriptionoftheproject !Contribution recruested
Iinu.a. [Contributioncommittemu.a.\Remarks
ONG/13/76(IRL)
CORTAProgrammetoassistandeducateafarm­
ers1associationinagricultural tech-
nitjues,Ethiopia
Totalcost:£1550£775
(1.859,99-.)1.859,99 paid
jONG/14/76(IRL)
iGORTAi
1Purchaseofamechanicalgrainmillto
avoidtheneedforthewomenofafarm­ingareatodothisworkbyhand,Nigeria
Totalcost:£1400£700
(1.680 \1.680paid
ONG/I5/76(IRL)
CORTA
1 îEquipmentandagriculturalstudycosts
for12studentsatalocaleducational
institution ,Pakistan
Totalcost:£650
1£325
(780,)780
9t
paid
•jONG/16/76(IRL)
jGORTA
•
h
11Soilanalysisandencouragement ofthe
useoffertilizersbythefarmers,Pakistan
jTotalcostî£159II4.42
1
1c7.500
(17.999,8.)Additionalinformationrequ*
edfromtheNGO
ÍONG/I7/76(IRL)
CORTASettingupofapoultrycooperativein
afarmingareatoincreasethevolume
andvalueofoutput,Swaziland
Totalcost:£8700£2.175,-
(5.220.)5.220I m11111 1
paid
ONG/I8/76(IRL)
G0RTAPurchaseofamechanicalgrainmillto
avoidtheneedforthewomentodothis
workbyhand,Tanzania
Totalcost:£2660£1.330
(3.192 }3.192paid

SUMMARYOFHGOPROJECTS
1
I
ProjectnoandN30JBriefdescriptionoftheproject 1Contributionrequested {inu.a. * {Contribution commitcax
inu.a,
18.216
t
iRemarks
paid
tONG/19/76(IRL)
GORTAImprovementoflocalfishingtechniques
andequipment,Yemen
Totalcost:£58320;£7.590
(18.216.)
0NG/?0/76(F)
iCENTREFRANÇAISDE
1LAPROTECTION DE
L'ENFANCEJParticipation intheequipmentofanew
Imulti-purpose centretoimprovethe
livingconditionsofwomenandchildren
including s
thesinkingof4wells,
thecommissioning ofamilletmill,
traimng,installation of2workshops,etc
Sénégal
TotalcostîfF935660250.000FF
(45-011,06 )
I
iA5.011,06
?Firstinstalment of
18004.43u.a.paid
ONG/21/76(F)
SECOURSCATHOLIQUE
r
I
»
i
*Construction andfittingoutofawork­
shopforrepairingagricultural tractors
inparticularconstruction ofabuilding
comprising anindoorandoutdoorwork­
shop,fittingoutthisworkshopandthe
construction ofahostelfortrainee
mechanics,Zambia
Totalcost:FF272600136.600FF
(24.594 )Tnisprojectissuspended,
sincetheNG0isunableforthe
momenttosupplyalltheneces­
saryinformation .
0NG/2?/76(UK)
HELPTKEAGEDConstructionofacraftworkshoptopro-l
videworkfortheelderly,India
Totalcost:£1260£64O
(1-536)1.536paid
ONG/23/76(LUX)
ACTIONFORMATION DE
CADRESEstablishment ofaworkshopforthepro­
ductionbywomenoflocalcraftarticles
andestablishment ofappropriate channel
Benin
TotalcosttLfrs.2542000*foo.oooFLux
.3
(l4.ooo ■.5
ii14*oooContractforwardedtothe
NGO.

SUMMARY OPNGO PROJECTS /I 6*
Project no.andNGO
ONG/?4/76(IT)
MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO
EPACEBrief description oftheproject
Land improvement ,inparticular byirri
gationandthesettling offarmers and
their families (50haand64families )
inaspecific region ,India
Total cost :Lit .52611559
;ONG/25/76(IRL)
IC0NCERN
ONG/26/76(UK)'
FAMILY PLANNING
ASSOCIATION OFGREAT
BRITAINSupply ofbasic equipment forahospital
Zambia \
Total cost î£2442
Various family planning education pro­
grammes inparticular viatheestablish
ment ofclinics andthetraining of
staff ,Pakistan ,Costa Rica .Guatemala ,
Honduras ,India
Total cost s£42900
;ONG/27/76(F)
!C.F.C.M.C.F.
ONG/28/76(F)
C.F.C.M.C.F.Arural community development scheme
involving agriculture ,stockf arming ,
small-scale craft work ,hygiene and
nutrition aimed atmaking aspecific
region self-sufficient infood ,Brazil
Total cost :FF124000Contribution requested
inu.a .
27£178.896 Lit
(43.326,23 .)
£1.221
(2.930,31
£21.450
(51.479,60
60.000 FF
(10.802,66 .)•
Improvements tofive rural school can­
teens ,each comprising kitchens and
canteen facilities ,akitchen garden anc
thekeeping ofsome animals ,"sotnat eath
cansupply itsownneeds orcome as •'
close tothis aspossible ,Upper-Volta .
Total cost :FF 323 000150.000 F?
(27.007 -Contribution coramitted |
1^-^Ti-nF 1M111inn–ONM ■■■MI.»nl
43.326,23
2.930,31
51.479.60
10.802,66Remarks
Contract forwarded toNGO
paid
Costa Rica )Contracts for-
Pakistan )warded toNGO
India )
Guatemala )
Honduras 9»H9»93 u.a.paid
paid
Notaccepted after appraisal

SUMMARY OFNGO PROJECTS&Ô
Projoctno. andNGO
0NG/29/76CF )
C.F.C.M.C.F.
0NG/30/76(F)
C.F.C.M.C.F.
ONG/31/76CF)
C.F.C.M.C.F.
ONG/32/76CF)
C.F.C.M.C.F.
•ONG/33/76C F)
|C.F.C.M.C. F.
ONG /34/76C F)
C.F.C.M.C.F.
ONG/35/76C F)
C.F.C.M.C.F.Brief description oftheproject
Construction ofthefacilities necessary
fortheoperation oftheSoroba rural
promotion centre .This centre istotrail
rural advisers ,male andfemale ,who wil3
then move into thevillages toimprove
anddiversify agricultural production ,
Mali .
Total cost :FF242 255
Drinking water supply fortheSaint-Jo -
seph Hospital andtheTuticorin leprosy
hospital ,India
Total cost :FF70000
Rebuilding ofadamaged farm school ,
Madagascar
Total cost :FF60000
Rural advisory operations ,inparticular !
covering thecost oftechnical assistants
andtheir accomodation ,andlocal train­
ingcourses ,Benin
Total cost sFF165000Contribution requested
inu.a .
Measures forthesettlement ofdisplaceds
rural population ,inparticular the I
establishment ofacooperative ,measures !
todevelop crops ,purchase ofanimal-drawn
equipment ,demonstration growing areas ,i
Niger Total cost :FF55000 -|
Help with thesettlement ofpeasants on
newagricultural land ,inparticular
through thepurchase offarm equipment ,
agricultural advisora services ,purchase
ofaudio-visual training equipment ,Peru
;Total cost sFF 280 000
Measures fortheresettlement ofrural
population affected bynatural disaster ,involving health ,nutritional andadmini
strative operations andthepurchase of
small items ofequipment ,Upper-Volta
Total cost « 130000115.000 FF.
(20.705 .09
28.000 FF.
(5.041 )
80.000 FF.
(14.404 )
25.000 FF.
4.501.11 ,
130.000 FF.
(23.406 >
60.000 FF.
<10.802,66 )32.000 FF.
(5.761,42 ,)Contribution coaimitteft
2o.7o5,o9Remarks
Contract forwarded toNGG
5.761,42
4.501 ,11
10.802,66Paid
Project withdrawn byNGO
Notaccepted after appraisal
Paid
Notaccepted after appraisal
Contract forwarded toK0

1/s-
SUMMARYOFNGOPROJECTS
«–«– :: j! 1x.ta.i l-jXProjectno.andNGO|Briefdescriptionoftheproject rec^ues^e(^|Contribution committeo .mu.a. TRemarks j
____ i
0NG/35/76(NL)
CEBEMODevelopmentoftheconstruction oflow-
sostpopularhousingbymutualbenefit
associations inruralareas;comraencemer ;
afothercommunityprogrammesparticular
lyinconnectionwithsubsidizedhousing
toimprovethemedicalandhealthsitua­tionandthestandardoflivingofthe
ruralpopulation,DominicanRepublic
Totalcost:fl.*459108224.424Hfl
(61.995,5861.995,53Firstinstalmentof |
24798.34u.a.paid >
I
!
I
I
■i
j
>
I
i
i 1
ONG/37/76(NL)
CEBEMOEducationoffarmersinagricultural
techniques.Establishment ofanewadapt
ededucationsystemtomeettheneedsof
kroungpeoplewhoareunabletobenefit
feromanormaleducation,Philippines
potalcost:F1360300!■168.61οΗΓ1
(46.577,34 )46.577,34Contractforwardedtothe
NQ0 1
I
!
jONG/38/75(IRL)
•CONCERN3upplyofanambulanceforahospital
jinaremote.region,GhanaTotalcosts£3636£1.818 ;
(4.363,36.)4.363.16: j
i
paid >
ONG/39/75(IRL)
CONCERNEquipmentforthecoordinatorofthe
TikonkoAgricultural ExtensionCentre,
SierraLeone
Totalcost:£7646£1.232
J(3.175,20 ■)3.175,20 .Paid :
i
i
ONG/40/75(IRL)
CONCERNConstructionofaCheshire-Home (purpos
builthouse)forhandicappedpersons
Dacca.Bangladeshj£33-ooo
j(79-l??»37~>
\
\
1
-ιProjectwithdrawnbytheNGO;
jTotal;ost:Ét66000

! SUMMARY OPNGOPROJECTS - >?
\ » % i
1"1
Project no,and NGO Brief description oftheproject|Contribution requestedinu.a .Contribution committe
inu.a .r Remarks
•ONG/41/76(IRL)
ICONCERN
I
i
1Supply ofamotor forariver boat in
oder tofacilitate access tothe marketi
forvillage producers ,Zambia
Total cost :£5428.302.714,15 I».Stg .
(6.514 )Held over to1977
1977
;ONG/42/76(IRL)
CONCERNEstablishment ofpoultry cooperative . |
Instructing trainees inbreeeding
techniques .Zambia553.68 fc.Stg .
(1.329 " )Held over to1977
1977
*
JONG/43/76(P)
JFONDATION DELTA 7Construction ofdaynurseries anda
community centre ,Vietnam
Total cost :FP35000005oo.ooo FF
(9o.o22,13 .)9o.o22 13First instalment of
36008,85 u.a .paid
IONG/44/76(D)
!ZENTRALSTELLE FÜR
|ENTWICKLUNGSHILFEEstablishment ofanironmongery trainin .
Workshop ,Tanzania
Total cost :Mi284000142.ooo DM
(38.797,82 ) 38.797,82 ....First instalment of15519u
paid
.!ONG/45/76(D)
•ZENTRALSTELLE FÜR
ENTWICKLUNGSHILFE
!Programme ofrural andsocial advisory
services involving theT'boli inorder
toencourage their economic development
Philippines
Total cost :DM682 000341.ooo DM
(93.169 /40 )93.169,4ο · First instalment of
37268u.a .paid
ONG/46/76(D)
ZENTRALSTELLE FÖR
ENTWICKLUNGSHILFEEstablishment ofapoultry production
andbreeding centre ,Tanzania
Total cost :DM 14300071.5oo DM
(19-535,52 .)19.535,52 ■ Paid
ONG/47/75 (FJ
Foînxvrio :;DELTA 7Settling 1000farming families onnew
agricultural land ,Cameroon
Total cost îFP300 000 .I50.000 FF
(27.oo6,64 )27.006,64 -Paid
»-

SUMMARYOPKOOPROJECTS
■■'■ ■ 11I,
Projectno.andNGO"Briefdescription oftheproject Contribution requested
inu.a.Contribution committe <
inu.a.Remarks
ONG/48/76(B)
FRERESDESHOMMESDevelopmentofnewagricultural land
andsocialadvisoryservicesforthe
forthepopulationconcerned,Ecuador
Totalcost:Bfrs.13924125736.694FB
(14.733,88)14.733,88 paid
ONG/49/76(B)
BUREAUD'ETUDEPOUR
UNDEVELOPPEMENT
HARMONISEEstablishment ofalive-stockcoopera­tive.Provisionoffacilitiesforrui»a!
stock-farming .
Ruraladvisoryandtrainingservices,
Zaire
Totalcost:Bfrs.30000001.500.000 FB
(30.000)30.000 paid
1
ONG/50/76(UK)
0XFAMConstruction ofhomesforthepoor
nearDacca,Bangladesh
Totalcostit6684633.423fc.Stg.
(80.215)80.215 Firstinstalmentof
32088u.a.paid

SUMMARY OFNGO PROJECTS11.
Project no.aïid NGOjBrief description oftheproject KJontribution requested
.nn.a.Contribution committee ! Remarks
•>" - ' _ ,
mm
i
>
>
90NG /51/76(UK )
CAFOO .Construction ofwindmills toimprove
theirrigation oflsuud ,Peru •
Total cost :£7526.72£3763,36
(9.032,06 )9.032,06 Paid
0NG/52/76(UK )
CAFODRural development project ,Cameroon
Total cost :£11.566,32£5833,38
(14.000 )14.000 Paid
0NG/53/76CIT )
MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO
EPACEPromotion ofcraft andagricultural
work inrural areas ,Rwanda
Total cost :Lit ,50000000
i__.25.000.000 Lit .
(40.000 )32.320 Contract forwarded to
NGO
i
0NG/54/76(IRL )
[CONCERNProvision ofamobile clinic equipment
for same ,etc , Botswana
Total cost :£ 5926£2963
(7.111,14 )7.111,14 Contract signed byHSO .
>1
tONG /55/76(IRL )
^CONCERN
3; ; ? * " 1
Provision of .amobile clinic equipment
for same .etc .India
Total cost :£ 43651
£2182,50
(5.238 )5.238 Paid
ι
ι
0NG/56/76CIT )
A.E.S.
iL/
Infrastructure andequipment fora
workshop fortherepais andmainte­
nance ofagricultural machinery ,Brazf
Total cost sLit 5°30000024.600.000 L?t .
(39.360 )39.360 Contract signed byNGO
loNG/57/76(NL )
N0VIB
ι_Establishment ofapigproduction coop
erative ,Colombia
Total cost :PI.1009 920101.601 N.Fl .
(28.066,57 )28.o66,57Contract forwarded to
NGO

SUMMARYOFHGOPROJECTS
m
(~jHf.nIBriefdescriptionoftheproject|(Projectno.andNGOIContributionrequested J
Lnu.a. IContribution committefl
inu.a. IRemarks
)NG/58/76(NL)
ICCOConstruction ofanapprovedschool,
Malawi
Total'cost:PI13484787.643N.Fl.
(24.210,77 )24.210,77 jCContractsignedbyNGO
»•
»
»
i
1«
)NG/59/76(B)
[LESdePAIX-
BELGIQUEEstablishment ofanirrigatedareafor
growingriceandwheat,andhelpfor
growersthroughthesupplyofseed,
fertilisers andequipment,Mali
TotalcosttBfrs.124OCX)0004.500.000 FB.
(90.000 )90.000 Firstinstalmentof
36000u.a.paid
1
3NG/60/76(D)
rfELTFRIEDENSDIENST
CWFD)ALLEMAGNEι ιι I' 1
SchemeforWFDvolunteerstoorganize
ruraladvisoryservicesinaspecific
region}trainingoflocaladvisors,trainingofsupervisorystaff,literacy
campaign,etc.IvoryCoast
'TotalcosttDM740000179.790 DM.I
(49.122,95 )I49.122,95Firstinstalmentof
19649.18u.a.paid I
I0NG/61/76URL)
ICONCERN[Provisionofamobileclinictoserve
[watersidevillages,SierraLeone
Totalcosts£1858£929
(2.229,58 )2.229,58ContractforwardedtoNGO
I
0NG/62/76UT)
L.V.I.A.Construction ofaruraltrainingcentre
includingruraladvisoryservices,a
cooperativeandfamilyeducation,
'Burundi
ITotalcost:Lit.93674000
146.450.000 Lit.
(74.320 )Heldoverto1977
1
0NG/63/76UT)
L.V.I.A.
1Trainingofagroupofyoungpeopleani
introducingthemtoagricultural and
horticultural productionandtopoultr
.rearing,Senegal
Totalcost:Lit.17I87000il8.593.000Lit.
I(13.749,60 )
y»Ii3.749r6oIContractforwardedtoNGO
–: S-y..1...■ 11 1''–»
I. 1

SUMMARY OPNGOPROJECTS t/
T – ■ :
Project no.andHGOiBrief description oftheprojectContribution requestedmu.a . (Contribution committecm 11.a.I Remarks
0NG/64/76(IT )
iL.V.I. A.
I
l
»
«
•Promotion ofrural development andim­
provements insocial hygiene .Upper -Vo
Volt a
ITotal Cost :Lit.125000000
r •-1–– ï62.500.000 Lit .
<100.000 )
IIJHe_ld cyer to1977
fONG /65/76CIT )
L.V.I.A.Project forrural advisoiy services ,
promotion ofimprovements insocial
hygiene ,improvement ofhousing and
craft education ,Ethiopia
Total cost :Lit.11200000056.000.000 Lit .
(84.600 )Held over to1977
0NG/66/76(8 )
INTERNATIONALE
BOUWORDE (IB0 )-
BELGIQUEConstruction ofhousing ,improvement of
infrastructure andvocational training
inforest villages ,Tunisia
Total cost :Bfrs .2500000410.000 FB.
(8.200 ) 8.200 U.c .^ _______
paid
JONG/67/76(UK)
jOXFAM
h-Construction ofacommunity centre for
refugees .Cyprus
Total cost :£36000£18.000
<43.199,65 )43.199,65 U.c . First instalment of
17279*86 u.a .paid
0NG/68/76(NL )
ICEBEM0
I
IProgramme forfamily education ,Fkpua -
New Guinea
.Total cost :PI9339442.394 N.Fl .
(11.711,05 ) 11.711,05 U.c .Contract forwarded toNC-0
0NG/69/76CNL )
CEBEM0Construction ofasecondary education
establishment ,Indonesia
Total cost :PI.151562
' I ■ * 175.781 N.Fl .
(20.933 ,98 )
!20.933,98 U.c .Contract forwarded toKG0
»
)0NG/70/76(NL )
JCEBEM0
« -■«– iat -.* » * ■■■
Programme oftechnical education ,
Tanzania >
Total cost :PI.17167968.270 N.Fl .
(18.831,48 .)1"."31,48 u.c . Contract forwarded toKGJ

SUMMARY OPHGO PROJECTS14
Project no.andKGO Brief description oft&eproject |(Contribution requeBted
Lnu.a.Contribution coramittea
inu.a . " IRemarks
0NG/71/76CF) j
CENTRE INTERNATIONA ,
deDEVELOPPEMENT ]
(CIDR ) FRANCE IIEstablishment ofatraining centre for
agricultural advisors and improvement
oftheroad network intheGofa region
Ethiopia
Total cost iFP 1667150140 .220 FF.
(25.245,81 .)25.245,81 Contract forwarded toSCO
0NG /72/76(B )
INTERNATIONALE
BOUWORDE (IB0 )-
BELGIQUEOrganisation ofbasic education course
atatraining centre formanagers of
cooperatives ,
-adult literacy campaign
-practical training forwomen
Venezuela
Total cost :Bfrs .2500 000
/1.250.000 FB.
(25.000 )
j
k ...25.000
i
i
i
!paid
I0NG/73/76(UK )
^CHRISTIAN AID
»
\
\r* -
Sinking ofwells toprovide therural
population with anadequate supply of
drinking water .Mali
Total cost îC.83591£41.667
(100.000 )loo .OOO Contract forwarded toSG0
|oNG/74/76QRL > J
:TR0CAIRE |i I
tEquxpTatu /.forao~heme forprimary
education radio ,Kondar y.
Total i-ost :e"j32 -1^9
I" I '■ - I(£20.000
(47.999,62 )
J47.999,62Contract forwarded to
NGO
•0NG/75/76CD )
WELT FRIEDENS DIENST
(WFD )- ALLEMAGNEtTraining -ofleaders for "human -
!development "schemes ,inparticular
inthe fields of :
-literacy
-rural advisory services
-vocational training , S*i>:gal
Total ccst :t)V621.'co94.900 DM.
(25.92 8,96 )1
125.92R96 psid

SUMMARY OPNGO PROJECTS1c
??
Project no. andEXBriefdescription ofthe"project jContribution requested ]
!inu.a. JContributi oncorami ttedi
inu.a.1 Remarks
0NG/76/76(D )
DEUTSCHE
.WELTHUNGERHILFE
|(OWHH)ALLEMAGNE
I
»
ISupport forawool–producing coopera­
tive ,inparticular :
-purchase ofproduction machinery
-purchase oflivestock ,
-construction ofashed ,
Polivi a
Total cost :DM426 3o5213.152 DM.
(58.238,53 ) 53.238,53Contract forwarded to
NGO -
0NG/77/76(UK )
JOSPICE INTERNATICNM ., , – – -
IEstablishment ofasmall clinic ,
;Honduras
ITotal cost :£21000£10.500
(25.199,80 ) 25.199.80paid
0NG/78/76(UK )
JOSPICE INTERNATIONA !Supply ofabarge andmedical
equipment toserve asamobile
clinic .Peru
Total cost :£18000£9.000
<21.599,83 ) 21.599,83 paid
1
j|0NG /79/76(B )
4FRERES des HOMMES
.1 BELGIQUEtConstruction ofaculvert ,
Upper Volta
Total cost :Bfrs .3^8^7851.889.029 FB.
(37.780 .)Project not accepted
after appraisal
t
0NG/80/76CB )
FRERES des HOMMES
BELGIQUE
Itquipnent forahcspital
Upper Volta
.Total post :Bfrs .640000320.000 FB.
(6.400 )Project not accepted
after appraisal
■0NG/81/76CUK )
0XFAM Programme forthereconstruction of
housing following theearthquake
•Guatemala
Total ccst :£285714£41.677
(100.000 .)100.000
IFirst insta.ment of
40000u.a .paid

16.
Project no. and NGC Brief description oftheprojectContribution requested I
inu.a . I-Contribution committei
inu.a. IRemarks
)NG/82/76(D )
ICNTRALSTELLE für
ENTWICKLUNGSHILFE
ALLEMAGNEEquipment for adult education ina I
spscific area(audio-visual equipment ,I
etc.) I
Tanzania
Total cost :DM142ooo71.000 DM.
<19.398,91 .,)■19.398,91 ■Contract forwarded toHCQ
>NG/83/76(f ) «
iOMJTE CATHOLIQUE j
contre laFAIM et |
lour leDEVELOPPEMEN'
FRANCE !1Construction ofari_ce_silo of
[looootonnes capacity .
:Vietnam
|Totalcost:FF5546ooo2.500.000 FF.
<450.110 Jloo .ooo
I.
!Contract forwarded to
JTG0 "
I0 . ■■
ÏNG'84/76(00
tN«f!Establishment ofaclinic ,
Kenya
Total cost :r141382t41,667
(100.000 )100.000 Contract forwarded to
NGO
m
)NG/85/76(IT ) ~ !
iRUPPO A8ELE
1-- • * -«y■•m : 3
1Construction ofachildren 'shome and
:ofavocational training centre ,
Vietnam
Total .,cost .:Lit .(24000 5oo62.500.000 Lit .
(100.000 )Held over to1977
0NG /86/76(D )
LCA- ■ v »
Rural development projects ,including
sanitation works ,village electricity
supply andelementary education ,Egypt
Total cost :DM49°I60
4204.200 DK.
<55.792,35 )55-792,35Contract forwarded to
N30
ING/87/76(0 )
'CNTRALSTELLE für
iNTWICKLUNGSHlL FE
1 ALLEtfAGNtImprovement offacilities atahospital ,
inparticular :
-construction ofsar.itation facilities ,
-construction ofstaff accommodation ,
-purchase ofequipment ,Indl a
T^tal cost :DM222 000111.000 DM.
(30.328 )13.556,561
Contract forwarded to
NGO

17.
SUMMARY OFNGO PROJECTS
* * ■I
Project no.andNGtj Brief description oftheprojectContribution™requestecf
inu.a .ConTrTbuîTôn commitTë
i.nu.a .I Remarks
0i\G/88/76(D )
ZENTRALSTELLE für
.ENTWICKLUNGSHILFE
i ALLEMAGNE
■ 4
!- iPurchase ofabuilding forthe
vocational training ofpersons
involved intherunning ofcoopera­
tives ,andfortheadministration of
thegroup ofcooperatives ,Thailand
Total cost :DM282 ooo141.000 DM.
(38.525 )Held over to1977
0NG/89/76(D )
ZENTRALSTELLE für
ENTWICKLUNGSHILFE
ALLEMAGNEImprovement oftheequipment ata
vocational training school ,
Paraguay
Total cost :DM665000
i–– : – :302.500 ΰΜ.
(82.650,27 )82.65o,27
1Contract forwarded to
NGO
3NG/90/76(D )
ZENTRALSTELLE für
ENTWICKLUNGSHILFE
ALLEMAGNE'
Improvement ofdrinking water supply
anddevelopment ofirrigated crops
in3ovillages ,Senegal
Total cost :DM600000300.000 DM.
<81.967,21 )81.967,21contract forwarded to
Ν00
|0NG/91/76(IT )MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO
î£PACE
I -Execution ofsoil andwater protection
works ,plus rural advisory services ,
Cape Verde Islands
Total cost :Lit .1265456o962.500.000 Lit .
(100.000 )loo .000 Contract forwarded to
I7G0
IONG/92/76CD )
1EVANGELISCHE
{ZENTRALSTELLE für
•ENTWICKLUNGSHILFE
i ALLEMAGNE
I.Establishment ofaCommunity Develop­
ment Centre ,including :
-purchase ofland
-construction ofthe Centre
-fitting-out oftheCentre
Mexi co
Total cost :DM2oo 000100.000 DM.
(27.322,40 )27.322,4oContract forwarded to
NGO

SUMMARY OPNGO PROJECTSIO.
14
Project no. andNGO Brief description oftheprojectContribution requested
inu.a .-I
Contribution committed
mu.a .Remarks
ONG/93/T6(lP.L )
CONCERNConstruction ofaccommodation for
homeless people ,Yemen
Total cost :64000L.Stg . 5•000
(12.000 )12.000 Contract forwarded to
"NGO
0NG/94/76(D )
_VJelthungerhilfe
XPWHH )Mechanization ofsmall farming
cooperatives ,Ecuador
Total cost :•DM8o2 000DM 366 .000
(loo.ooo )Held over to
1977
I
I
I
I
!
I

TABLEIII-BREAKDOWN BYRECIPIENT .COUNTRY.
N°ofProjects ReT.n°ofProject Communitycontribution
BANGLADESH 1
IONG/50/76(UK) 80,215U.a.
BENIN 1 0NG/23/76CLUX) 14,000 U.a.
SOLIVIA 2 0NG/12/76(IRL)
0NG/76/76(D)12,000U.a.
58,238.53 U.a.
Total:70,238.53 U.a.
BOTSWANA 1 0NG/54/76(IRL) 7,111.14U.a.
BRAZIL 2 0NG/27/76(F)
0NG/56/76CIT)10,802.66 U.a.
39,360 U.a.
Total:50,162.66 U.a.
CAMEROON
I2
i
iONG/47/76(F)
0NG/52/76CUK)27,006.64 U.a.
14,000 U.a.
Total:41,006.64 U.a.
CAPEVERDE 1 0NG/91/76(IT)
I100,000 U.a.
COLOMBIA 2 ONG/10/76(NL)
0NG/57/76(NL)6,229U.a.
28,066.57 U.a.
Total:34,295.57 U.a.
COSTARICA 1 0NG/26/76(UK) 14,999.88U.a.
CYPRUS 1 ONG/67/76(UK) 43,199.65 U.a.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 2 ONG/6/76(D)
ONG/36/76(NL)86,479.78U.a.
61,995.58 U.a.
Total:148,475.36 U.a.
EGYPT 1 0NG/86/76CD) 55,792.35U.a.
IEQUADOR1 0NG/48/76(B) 14,733.88U.a.

^ι
ETHIOPIA 2 0NG/13/76CIRL) 1-860U.a.
ONG/71/76CP) 25,245.81 U.a.
Total:27,105.81 U.a.
GHANA 1 0NG/38/76(IRL) 4,363.16U.a.
GUATEMALA 2 ONG/26/76(UK) 9,119.93U.a.
0NG/81/76(UK) 100,000 U.a.
Total:109,119.93 U.a.
HAITI 1 ONG/8/76CF) 29,707.30 U.a.
HONDURAS 3 ONG/26/76CUK) 9,119.93U.Ô.
0NG/74/76(IRL) 47,999.62U.a.
ONG/77/76(UK) 25,199.8 U.a.
Total:82,319.35U.a. |
_i
INDIA ONG/4/76(D) 25,266.39u.d.I
ONG/22/76(UK) 1,536U.a. !
ONG/24/76(IT) 43,326.23 U.a.
0NG/26/76(UK) 9,119.93 U.a.
ONG/30/76(F) 5,761.42U.a. !
0NG/55/76(IRL) 5,238U.a.
0NG/87/76(D) 13,556.56 U.a.
|Total:103,805.53u.a.j
. _ .. ..
INDONESIAI
1. ONG/69/76(NL) 20,933.98 U.a.
IV0RYC0AST 1 0NG/60/76CD) 49,122.95 U.a.
I
KENYA 1 0NG/84/76CUK) 100,000U.a.
MALAWI 1 0NG/58/76(NL) 24,210.77 U.a.
MALI 30NG/29/76(F)[ 20,705.09 U.a.
0NG/59/76CB) ■.90,000U.a. I
0NG/73/76(UK) 100,000U.a. !
i
Total:210,705.09 U.a. :
MAURITIUS 1 ONG/5/76(D)^–m-mmmm–.1■ii ■1
38,299.18U.a.'I
MEXICO 1 0NG/92/76(D>– j
27,322.4U.a. I
NIGER1 0NG/33/76(F)!
4,501.11U.a.i
NIGERIA 1 0NG/14/76(IRL) 1,680U.a.

I
PAKISTAN 2 ONG/15/76CIRL) 780U.a.
ONG/26/76(UK) 9,119.93U.a.
Total:9,899.93U.a.
PAPUANEWGUINEA 1 0NG/68/76(NL) 11,711.05U.a.|
I
PARAGUAY 1 0NG/89/76CD) 82,650.27 U.a.
PERU 2j0NG/51/76(UK) 9,032.06U.a.
0NG/78/76(UK) 21,599.83 U.a.
Total:30,631.89U.a.
PHILIPPINES 2 0NG/37/76CNL)I 46,577.34U.a.
0NG/45/76CD) 93,169.4 U.a.
Total:139,746.74 U.a.
RWANDA 1 0NG/53/76(IT) 32,320 U.a.
SENEGAL 4 0NG/20/76(F) 45,011.06 U.a.
ONG/63/76(IT) 13,749.6U.a.
0NG/75/76<D) 25,928.96 U.a.
0NG/90/76(D) 81,967.21U.a.
Total:166,656.83 U.a.
SIERRALEONE 2 0NG/39/76(IRL) 3,175.2U.a.
0NG/61/76CIRL) 2,229.58U.a.
'
iTotal:5,404.78U.a.
SWAZILAND 2 0NG/11/76CIRL) 3,600U.a.
I
0NG/17/76(IRL) 5,220 U.a.>
Total:8,820U.a.
TANZANIAI
!6 ONG/1/76CIRL) 14,436U.a.
0NG/18/76(IRL) 3,1,92U.a.
0NG/44/76CD) 38;797.82U.a.
ONG/46/76CD) 19,535.52 U.a.
I0NG/70/76CNL) 18,831.48 U.a.
0NG/82/76CD) 19,398.91 U.a.
Total:114,191.73 U.a.
THAILAND 2 ONG/2/76CD) 34,626.23U.a.
ONG/3/76(D) 43,744 U.a.
Total:78,370.23 U.a.

TUNISIA 1 ONG/66/76(B ) 8.200 U.a .
UPPER VOLTA 2
!
iONG /9/76CB )
ONG /35/76(F)15,000 U.a .
10,802.66 U.a .
Total :25.802.66 U.a .
VENEZUELA
I1 0NG/72/76(B ) 25,000 U.a .
VIETNAM 2 ONG /43/76(F)
ONG/83/76(F)90,022.13 U.a .
100,000 U.a .
Total :190,022.13 U.a .
YEMEN ARAB REPUBLIC 2 0NG/19/76CIRL )
0NG /93/76(IRL )18,216 U.a .
12,000 U.a .
Total :30,216 U.a .
ZAIRE 1 0NG/49/76(B > 30,000 U.a . I
i
ZAMBIA 1 0NG/25/76CIRL ) 2,930.31 U.a .
TABLE Illb -BREAKDOWN BYCONTINENT
Africa
Asia
Central and
Latin America1.145.740 U.a .
634.704 U.a .
719.557 U.a .

TABLE IV
Classification ofprojects approved in1976u
Economic Development
1.Agriculture andFisheries
2.Small enterprises andCommerce
3.Infrastructure (irrigation eto.V
Social Development
4«Education andTraining
5«Health
Habitat ,community centres ,creches etc.
III .Integ-rated Rura
TotalNo.of
Project s
9
8
11
22
10
8
76Amount in
u.a .
321,253.20
242,026 .?2
436,728.92
565,758.43
267,026.70
345,670.07
320,537.2 3
B,500,00012.85
9.68
17.47
2?.67
10.68
13.83
12.82
100

TABLE V
BreakdownbyNGOofprojects
approvedin1976

ss
BELGIUM
NGO Ref.no.of
Project[RécipientCountryCoitaïunity
Contribution
Bureaud'Etudepour
unDéveloppement
Harmonisé
av.Jeanne44
lo5oBruxelles
Sub-totalONG/49/76(B)Zairelu.a.
30,000
i
1
30,000u.a.
1,500,000 FB
CentreAideauDéve­
loppement *dansla
LibertéetleProgrès
ruedeNaples39
I050Bruxelles
Sub-totalONG/9/76(B)UpperVolta
I
i
i
i_J15.000
15,000U.a.
750,000PB
f
FreresdesHommes
PlacedeLondres6
Bte.6
lo5oBruxelles
\
Sub-total ;_____ __1
ONG/48/76(B)I
I
1I
I
I
Equador
1
i
i<
14,733,88
14i73488u.a.
736,694PB
Internationale
Bouworde(lBO)•
Naamsesteenweg 573
3o3oHeverlee
Sub-totalONG/66/76(B)
ONG/72/76(B)Tunisia
Venezuela8,200
25,000
33,200u.a.
1,660,000PB
LesIlesdePaix
rueduMarché35
52ooHuy
Sub-totalONG/59/76(B)Mali
I90,000
%90,000u.a.
4,500,000PB
Total1I82,933.88u.a .
9,146,694PB

FEDERAL REPUB\1nfKRMAWY
NGO–:–R.Ref.no.ofjRecipient ]Project 1Country jCoiwimnity
Contribution
DeutscheWelthungeiiiilf e
Adenauerallee 49
D-53ooBonn
.ub-Total
I0NG/2/76(D)
ONG/3/76(D)
ONG/4/76(D)
ONG/5/76(D)
0NG/6/76(D)
ONG/76/76(D)Thailand
Thailand
India
Mauritius
Domimcan
Republic
Boliviau.a.
34,626.23
43,744
25,266.39
38,299-18
86,479.78
58,238.53
Y
286,654*11u.a.
l,o49f154.04DM
Evangelische Zentrais »llefür
Entwicklungshilfe Alivimagne
Mittelstraße 37
D-53ooBonn
Sub--PotalONG/92/76(D)Mexico 27,322.40
27,322.4ou.a.
99.999.98DM
!
InstituteofCulturalAff^.rsWrangelstraBe 83
D-loooBerlin34
Sub-TotalONG/86/76(D)Egypt55,792.35
55,792.35u.a.
2o4,2oo.ooDM
WeVtfriedensdienst
Jelynstraße 1
D-IGYJBerlin
Sub-TotalONG/6o/76(D)
ONG/75/76(D)IvoryCoast
Sénégal49.122.95
25.928.96
75,051.91«•»'
274,689.99 DM
Zentralstelle fürEntwicklungs­hilfe
MozartstraBei9
D-5100Aichen
Sub-Total
T
V.'ONG'44/76(0)
ONG/45/76(D)
ONG/46/76(D)
ONG/82/76(D)
ONG/87/76(D)
ONG/89/76(D)
ONG/9o/76(D)Tanzania
Philippin® *
»
Tanzania
Tanzania
India
Paraguay
Sénégal38.797.82
.93.l69.4o
%19.535.52
19.398.91
13.556.56
82.65o.27.
81.967.67
349,075.69u.a.
1,277>617-03DM
1 TOTAL
y
s793,896.42U.£•
2,9o5|66LDM
U
\

NGO Ref.no .of
ProjectHecioient
OountryCommunity
Contribution
Centre Français deProtection
del'Enfance
97Bd.Berthier
P-75ol7 Paris
Sub-TotalONG/2O/76(F ) Sénégalu.a .
45,oll.o6
45.0ll .06u.a
249,999-98 FP
ICentre International deDéveloppe­
ment etdeReoherche
B.P.l Autrêches
Ft6o35o Cuise –la-Motte
Sub-Total0NG/71/76(F ) Ethiopia 25,245.^1
25,245.81 u.ai .
14o,22o.o25 FF
|Comité Catholique contre laFaim
etpour leDéveloppement (CCFD )
47,quai desGrands Augustins
P-75oo6 Paria
Sub-Total ]ONG/83/76(F) VietnamJloo,ooo
loo .000
555,419 FF
Comité Français delaCampagne
Mondiale contre iaFaim
rue Cambronne 42
F-75ol5 Paris
Sub-TotalONG/27/76(F )
ONG/29/76(F )
,ONG/3o/76(F )
ONG/33/76(P )
ONG/35/76(F )Brazil j
Mali
India
Niger
Upper Volta10.802.65
2o,7o5 .09
5,761.42
4,5ol.ll
10.802.66
~2,572.9ou.a
291,999-86 FF
t
Fondation Delta 7
8rue deRichelieu
F-75°ol Paris
Sub-TotalONG/43/76(F)
ONG/47/76(F )Vietnam
Cameroon
t1 9°*o22«13
27,006.64
117,028.77 u.1
.650.000 .o2FP
Secours Catholique
I06 rue duBac
F-75341 Paris Sub-Total
% .0NG/8/76(F ) Haiti 29,7o7.3o
29,7o7.3o u.a
164,999-98 FF
TOTAL369,563.88 uJa
2,052,628 FF

IRELAHD
NC0 Ref.no .of JRecipient
Project j Country
»■-
Coinniunity
Contribution
CONCERN
1Upper Camden St.
Dublin 2
Sub-TotalONG/I/76(IRL )
ONG/25/76(LRL )
ONG/38/76(LRL )
ONG/39/76(IRL)
ONG/54/76(LRL )
ONG/55/76(IRL )
ONG/6L/76(LRL )
ONG/93/76(IRL)Tanzania
Zambia
Ghana
Sierra Leone
Botswana
India
Sierra Leone
Yeraenu.a .
14,436
2,93o.31
4,363.16
3,175·7ο
7,111.14
5,738
2,229.5
12,ooo
51f483.8o u.a .
21,451.75h.Sit
GORTA
Aston HouBe
Aston Place
Dublin 2
Sub-Total0NG/13/76(IRL )
0NG/14/76(IRL )
ONG/l5/76(IRL)
0NG/17/76(IRL )
ONG/l8/76(IRL)
0NG/19/76(IRL )IEthiopia
Nigeria
Pakistan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Yemen Arab
Republic1,859.99
l,68o
780
5,22o
3,192
18,216
3o.947.99 u.al
12.895.09 fc.Stg .
TROCAIRE
I69Booterstown Av.
Blckrock
Co.Dublin
Sub–Total0NG/11/76(IRL )
0NG/12/76(IRL )
ONG/74/76(lRL )Swaziland
Bolivia
Honduras3,600
12,ooo
47,999-62
63,599.62 U.î .
26,5oo.o5 o.Stg .
TOTAL
*146,o31>o8 u.i.
60,846.77 fc.Stg

vv
ITALY
NGO Ref.no.of
ProjectRécipient
Country[ComrfùnityContribution
Associazione degliAmicidello
StatoBrezilianoEspiritoSanto
(ASS)
ViaCavour13
1-351ooPadova
Sub-Total0NG/56/76(IT)Brazilu.a.
39,36o
39>36ou.a.
24,600,000Lit.
LayVolunteersInternational
Community(LVIA)
ViaStoppani31
I-121ooCuneo
Sub-Total0NG/63/76(IT)
I
I
ISénégal 13,749-6o
13,749*60U.E
8,593,5OOLit.
MovimentoSviluppoePace
ViaMagenta12
I-lol28Torino
Sub-Total0NG/24/76(IT)
ONO/53/76(lT)
0NG/91/76(IT)India
Rwanda
CapeVerde43,376.13
32,32o
lOOjOOO
175,646.23U..
109,778,893.75 L
TOTALI
AI
I
1«
i
228,755.83u.
142,972.394-75 LiJ

yS
LUXEMBOURG
NGO Rer.no.ofProjectRecipientCountry Community
Contribution u.a.
ActionFormation
deCadres
23,Av.Gaston
Diderich
Luxembourg-vilieONG/23/76(LUX) Bénin 14>ooo
Total 14rooou.a.
700,000P.Lux.

yy
NETHERLANDS
NC0 Ref.no.ofIRecipient .
Project ICountryCommunity
Contribution
CentralevoorBemiddelingbij
Medefinanciering vanOntwikkelinge
programma's(CEBEMO)
VanAlkemadelaan 1
DenHaag
Sub-TotalONG/36/76(NL
IONG/37/76(KL
ONG/68/76(NL'
ONG/69/76(NL;
ONG/7o/76(NL])Doriiinican
Republic
)Philippines
)lPapua-New
!Guinea
)Indonesia
)Tanzaniau.a.
61,995.58
46,577.34
11,711.05
20,933.98
18.831.48
l6o,o49«43u.a
579,378.93 PL
Interkerkelijke Coördinatie
CommissieOntwikkelingspro jekten
(iCCO)
IMaritskade63
IAmsterdam
Sub-Total
i
■■ I0NG/58/76(NL;
1Malawi 24,210.77
24,21o.77u.aL
87,642.98PL
Nederlandse Organisatie voor
Internationale Ontwikkelings­
samenwerking (NOVIB)
VanBankenburgstr .6
DenHaag
Sub-TotalONG/lo/76(NL)
ONß/57/76(NL)j
i1.––––––
Colombia
Colombia6,229
28,o66.52
34,295.52u.a.
124,149.78 FL
111"
TOTAL 218,555-77U.K.
791,171.70 PL

'/J
UNITED KINGDOM
NGORef.no.of
ProjectRécipient
CountryComraunity
Contribution
AfricanMedicalandResearch
Foundation(AMRF)
27DoverSt.
London
Sub-Total0NG/84/76(UK)Kenyau.a.loo,000
loo,000u.a.
fe.Stg.41»667
CatholicFundforOverseas
Development (CAFOD)
21ASohoSq.
LondonWIV6NR
Sub-TotalONG/5l/76(UK)
ONG/52/76(UK)
IPeru
Cameroon9,o32.06
14,000
23,o32.o6U.i
ï.Stg.9»596.77
ChristianAid
P.O.Bexno1
LondonSW?8BH.
Sub-Total0NG/73/76(UKMali100.000
100,000u.a.
fe,St«.41,667
FamilyPlanningAssociationof
GreatBritain
MargaretPykeHouse
27-35MortimerSt.
LondonWIA4QW
Sub-TotalONG/26/76(UK)Co6taRica
|Honduras
jGuatemala
'Pakistan
.India51,479.60
I
51,479.60U
b.Stg.21,45°
HelptheAged
8DenmanSt.
LondonWIA2AP
Sub-Total0NG/22/76(UK\India 1,536
-1,536u.a.
h.Stg.64o

UNITED KINGDOM .Continued
I NCO Ref.no .of
ProjectReoipient
CountryCo.tmunity
Contribution
Jospice International ,
Ince Road
Thornton
Liverpool 23
Sub-TotalCNG/77/76(UK )
ONG/78/76(UK )Honduras
Peru25,199.8o
21,599.83
"46,799.63 u.aL
fe.Stg .19,5oo J
OXPAM 1
274Banbury Road ;
Oxford 0X2 7D2
Sub-TotalONG/5O/76(UK )
ONG/67/76(UK )
ONG/8l/76(UK )Bangladesh
Cyprus
Guatemala8o,215
43,199.65
loo.ooo
223,414.65 U.J
fc.stg .93,090.18 ;
I
!
ι
»
i
TOTAL1
1■IM 11 I'FCMMNI 1«"■ 1546,261.94 v
fe.Stg .227 ,610 .9^