ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES 
DE LA COMMISSION 
 
 
 
COLLECTION RELIEE DES 
DOCUMENTS "COM" 
 
 
 
 
COM (84) 773 
 
 
 
Vol. 1984/0 273 
  
 
Disclaimer  
Conformém ent au règlement (CEE, Euratom) n° 354/83 du Conseil du 1er février 1983 
concernant l'ouverture au public des archives historiques de la Communauté économique 
européenne et de la Communauté européenne de l'énergie atomique (JO L 43 du 15.2.1983, 
p. 1), tel que modifié par le règlement (CE, Euratom) n° 1700/2003 du 22 septembre 2003 
(JO L 243 du 27.9.2003, p. 1), ce dossier est ouvert au public. Le cas échéant, les documents 
classifiés présents dans ce dossier ont été déclassifiés conformément à l'article 5 dudit 
règlem ent. 
In accordance with Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 of 1 February 1983 
concerning the open ing to the public of the historical archives of the European Econom ic 
Communit y and the European Atom ic Energy Communit y (OJ L 43, 15.2.1983, p. 1), as 
amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1700/2003 of 22 September 2003 (OJ L 243, 
27.9.2003, p. 1), this file is open to the public. Where necessary, classified documents in this 
file have been declassified in conformity with Article 5 of the aforementioned regulation.  
In Übereinstimmung mit der Verordnung (EWG, Euratom) Nr. 354/83 des Rates vom  1. 
Februar 19 83 über die Freigabe der historischen Archive der Europäischen  
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und der Europäischen Atomgem einschaft (ABI. L 43 vom  15.2.1983,  
S. 1), geändert durch die Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 1700/2003 vom 22. Septem ber 2003  
(ABI. L 243 vom 2 7.9.2003, S. 1), ist diese Datei der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit  
erforderlich, wurden die Verschlusssachen in dieser Datei in Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 5  
der genannten Verordnung freigegeben.  
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
C O M(84) 773 fin al
B russels, 16 January 1985
TWELFTH REPORT BY THE COMMISSION TO THE COUMCIL
on t h e  i m p l e m e n t a t i o n  o f  C o u n c i l  R e g u l a t i o n  (FIX ) Uo . 54 3 / 69
o f  25  N a r c h  196D on t h e  
h a r m o n i z a t i o n  o f  c e r t a i n  s o c i a l  l e g i s l a t i o n  
r e l a t i n g  t o  r o a d t r a n s p o r t
(1 J a n u a r y  1 9 8 2 t o  31 D ecem b er 1 9 8 2)
C O M(84) 773 fin al

-  1 -
CONTENTS
PAGE
Introduction t
Comparative analysis of information
supplied by the Member States 3
I. Organization of control 3
1. Administrative organization of 3
inspection
2. Authorized inspecting officers and 3
their powers
3. Methods of inspection (place and 3
frequency)
II. Infringements and penalties 5
1. The number of infringements 5
of the Regulation
2. Penalties imposed 5
III.  Multilateral mutual assistance between G
Member States and notification of infringements
IV. Suggestions and comments by the Member States 8
Final conclusions by the Commission 9
ANNEXES 10

-  2 -
INTRODUCTION
Article 17 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 543/69 lays down that 
each year the Commission shall present to the Council a general 
report on^the implementation of this regulation by Member States" 
and that "...Member States shall communicate to the Commission 
the necessary information using a standard form of report.'..".
This report covers 1982 and gives an overall view of the 
implementation of Regulations (EEC) Nos. 543/69 and 1463/70 in 
nine Member States. In spite of the fact that Regulation (EEC)
No. 543/69 became applicable to Greece for international 
transport with effect from 1 January 1982, the Commission has 
received no information on this subject.

- 3 -
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF 
INFORMATION SUPPLIED EY THE MEMBER STATES
Ï)  ORGANIZATION OF CONTROL
1) Administrative organization of inspection
Administrative measures have been taken in Ireland to improve 
the aj^plication of the Regulations. Other measures are being 
prepared and are expected to yield results in 1983.
Denmark has stepped up training for police officers and 
factory inspectors who carry out the controls. This has led to 
an immediate increase in the number of vehicles checked.
2 )  /Authorized inspecting officers and their powers
Apart from the increase in the number of police officers in 
Denmark from 300 to 500, and in factory inspectors in France 
from 49 to 78, there have been no major changes in the figures 
given in the previous report.
3) Methods of inspection (place and frequency)
The United Kingdom is in the process of equipping its offices 
with a computerized tachograph tape reader for 1983.

- 4 -
NUMBER OF CHECKS CARRIED OUT IN 1982 (l)
Member State Roadside Undertaking
BELGIUM 8.037 (2) 790
DENMARK 42.950 420 (3)
GERMANY 297.000 (4) 18.980
FRANCE 679.320 42.214
IRELAND 4.631 2.991
ITALY no information no information
LUXEMBOURG (5) 795 632
NETHERLANDS 220.000 500 in-depths  
checks
UNITED KINGDOM 235.924
+47.187 silent checksnot
registered
(1) For the extent of comparability of the checks in the  
different Member States see also Annexes 1, 2 and 3.
(2) This figure does not include the 8 000 checks carried out by  
officials of the Ministry of Transport, the Gendarmerie,  
Customs and other departments. It is not clear whether the  
number refers to the number of crews checked or the number  
of checks.
(3) This figure refers to the number of checks carried out.
(4) This is an estimate based on the number of fines imposed,  
warnings given, and infringements noted.
(5) These figures refer to the checks carried out by the  
Inspectorate for Factories and Mines and include  
approximately 580 checks carried out by Ministry of  
Transport officials.
The figures for the numbers of checks carried out cannot really  
be compared, particularly since in some cases it is not clear  
whether they refer to the number of checks or the number of  
6rews checked.

- 5 -
II) INFRINGEMENTS AND PENALTIES
1) Number of infringements of the Regulation
To make the figures more comparable, they have been brought  
together, in the same form, where possible, in Annexes 1, 2 and  
3, leaving blanks where no information was supplied, or the  
information received was inadequate or could not be used.
Commertts made in previous years concerning this chapter still  
apply.
A disproportionately high number of infringements of Article 5  
(age of drivers) was noted in Italy (see Annex 6).
2) Penalties imposed
TABLE OF INFRINGEMENTS - 1982
(the figures relate to both goods and passenger transport operations)
COUNTRY Infringe­
ments
detectedNumber of  
prosecutions% of in­
fringements  
detectedpenalties
imposed% of in­
fringements  
detected
BELGIUM 1.014 444 44 12 1
DENMARK * - - - - -
GERMANY 91.957 74.190 82 38.286 42
FRANCE 442.758 151.658 34 14.621*** 3***
IRELAND ** 2.835 701 28 184 6
ITALY 131.568 - - - -
LUXEMBOURG** 270 35 13 - -
NETHERLANDS 34.421 8.913 26 890 2
UNITED
KINGDOM 12.684 8.550 67 2.808 22
* Denmark: 2 577 official reports and 315 people prosecuted.
** Ireland and Luxembourg provide no figures on the prosecution of  
infringements.
*** France: for the correct interpretation of these figures, see footnote in  
annex 7.4.

—  6
I11·  MULTILATERAL MUTUAL ASSISTANCE BETWEEN MEMBER STATES AND 
NOT I FI CATION OF INFRINGEMENTS
To explain the disproportion between the number of 
infringements and the number of prosecutions in Belgium, the 
Belgian Government points out that the social services 
inspectors have the right to give warnings and are under no 
obligation to systematically notify the authorities of every 
infringement observed.
The Belgian Transport Authorities have been informed of 794 
infringements reported by German, Dutch, Luxembourg and 
French inspectors, involving Belgian vehicles. Belgium has 
itself transmitted lists of infringements involving drivers 
of vehicles registered in the other Member States to the 
authorities of those countries, and has declared that it has 
no information regarding the sanctions applied in the other 
Member States.

7
Denmark lias received three reports of infringements committed by 
Danish nationals in the Netherlands and an unspecified number of 
reported fines paid by Danish drivers in Germany.
The Federal German Government maintains regular bilateral 
contacts with representatives of governments of neighbouring 
countries in order to ensure that the provisions of Regulations 
(EEC) No. 543/69 and 1463/70 and the AETR are observed. It has 
also received reports of infringements committed by German 
nationals in Belgium and France.
France states that it has communicated to the other Member States 
lists of their nationals who were involved in infringements of 
the Community Regulations concerned on French territory.
On the other hand, France has declared that it has received 
similar information about its nationals in other Member States 
only from Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands.
Ireland reports that it has a system of mutual exchange of 
information on this subject with the United Kingdom and France.
Italy still has difficulties in informing the other Member States 
about infringements committed by their nationals.
Luxembourg was informed of 27 reports drawn up by German,
Belgian, Dutch and French inspectors regarding infringements 
comitted by Luxembourg drivers, and reports that it has 
transmitted lists of reported infringements involving foreign 
drivers to the authorities of their respective countries.
The Netherlands reports that it has transmitted reports 
concerning 178 infringements to Belgium, one each to Denmark and 
Italy, 19 to Germany and 12 to France. It has received 170 such 
reports from Belgium, approximately 4 000 from Germany and 7 from 
France.
The United Kingdom reports every three months to the authorities 
of other Member States on infringements committed by their 
nationals. It reports that it occasionally receives similar 
reports about British drivers from other Member States.
As in the past, there are certain obvious contradictions in these 
reports which the Commission is unable to clarify.

-  8 -
IV. SUGGESTIONS AMD COMMENTS BY THE MEMBER STATER
Belgium again observed how hard it is for firms to meet the 
demands set out in contracts concluded with clients who totally 
disregard Regulations (EEC) No. 543/69 and 1463/70 with respect 
to transporters, and stated that it would like to see these firms 
placed under the same obligations as the transporters and 
drivers.
Denmark repeated its request for the standard report to be 
modified; this should also cover infringements of Regulation 
(EEC) No. 1463/70 and the AETR.
The Federal Republic of Germany noted an increase in fraud by 
tarapering with tachographs, false records or record sheets; 
pressure from foreign competitors being the usual pretext. It was 
also noted that in 1982 infringements committed by foreign 
drivers on the whole concerned driving time and rest periods; 
assuming that this is due to some extent to a lack of knowledge, 
it has been suggested that more and better information should be 
provided.
A third point which was again raised by Germany was the 
difficulty in observing the required rest time after continuous 
hours of driving on roads with heavy traffic due to the lack of 
space on parking areas, particularly during holiday periods. It 
was suggested that Regulation (EEC) No. 543/69 should include the 
provision set out in Article 8(1)(a) of the AETR. The Federal 
Government attaches great importance to the contacts which the 
Commission has made with other Member States and supports all 
measures which may contribute to making the rules clearer and 
more flexible, without, however, changing them in substance.
With a view to improving inspection at operators' premises, Italy 
is in favour of a system for the authentification and numbering 
of the tachograph record sheets, and an extension of the x^eriod 
during which they should be preserved by firms. Italy also 
suggests that more up-to-date technology should be used, e.g. 
discs rather than paper, to avoid (sometimes deliberate) damage.
The Netherlands has sent the Commission 1 proposal for a new, 
simplified, standard report. It also calls for a review of social 
legislation in the field of transport, the principle rules of 
which should be simplified in order to improve both application 
and supervision.

- 9 -
FINAL CONCLUSIONS BY THE COMMISSION
In the spring of 1984 the Commission submitted a proposal 
amending Regulations Nos. 543/69 and 1463/70. In the explanatory 
memorandum it gave an account of the experience with these 
Regulations so far. In the Commission's view the present report 
confirms the statements and judgements contained in the 
explanatory memorandum. It does therefore not consider it 
appropriate to discuss this document here in detail.
One aspect of the proposed amendment is that the report should in 
future appear once every two years. It would also place the 
information required from the Member States on a new footing to 
improve the speed with which it is provided as well as the 
quality. Further activities will show whether the Member States 
are prepared to make the necessary joint effort with the 
Commission to turn the present routine into a real attempt to 
develop a system of documentation that is of practical use for 
the development of a social policy in the field of transport.

~  10  -
Al .T NX E S
5 . 2  
G  .
7.1
7.2
7.4
0.1
p.  2
3.3Goods transport (infringements detected)
Regular passenger transport (.infringements detected) 
Occasional passenger transport (infringements detected) 
Germany. Infringements detected, broken down by article
(nationals and foreigners).
Infringements detected, broken dovm by article' 
and nationality.
Amounts of penalties recorded by nationality. 
Infringements detected.
Roadside checks. Infringements detected and 
prosecuted, by nationality.
Checks at operators' premises. Overall figures 
and infringements of Regulation No. 543/69. 
Checks at operators' premises (conto.), by 
infringements of Regulation No. 1463/70. 
Penalties imposed.
United Kingdom Vehicles inspected (goods and passengers), by 
nationality.
United Kingdom Infringements detected (goods and passengers), 
article and by nationality.
United Kingdom Penalties (goods and passengers).1 . 
2 .
3 .  
A .
5.1 Netherlands
Netherlands 
Italy. 
France.
France.
7.3 France
1 ranee
by

ANNEX 1
GOODS TRANSPORT (infringements)1982
B.EK(*) D F.(**) IRL. I. L. N.L. U.K.
Nat.For.Nat.For.Nat.For.Nat. For.Nat.For.Nat.For.Nat.For.Nat.For.Nat.For.
a) Art. 6 2 16751 947452 821
b) Art. 7.1
(Art. 6) 8.425 934
Art. 7.2
(Art. 6) 15.4691.398
Art. 7.4 89 19.564 972.771 307458102
(Art. 6) 122 39 3108125.332 11.9262.011 474.503 440674126
Art. 7.1 44 3.441 18 1231241
(not Art. 6) 4.329 178
Art. 7.2
(not Art. 6) 4.985 183
Art. 7.4.
(not Art. 6) 32653
c) Art. 8 47 4.637 654 84 69013
d) Art. 11.1 89 19 8.834 79247.958 2.716 413164.411 519494114
e) Art. 12 12 6 21267 2 2 3689
f) Art. 14.1 1 171123799
Art. 14.2 64561256
Art. Mothers 2 94.2624.300 42133
g) Art. 15.1 5 9746 16117
Art. 15.2 2734
h) Others and
Reg. 1463/70 4361912212630.2592.355336.331 10.1322766296.3281.705 618.6531.169 79113
TOTAL 8 4 91 91 8 61 2 678.0506.792432.626 10.1322.766 29 116.179 8.9412234730.3692.44510.334688
Total Nat.+ For. 868 312 84.842 442.758 2.795 125.120 270 32.814 11.112
Prosecutions 329 312 74.190 151.658 35 8.699 5.327
Penalties 12 38.286 14.621 890 2.494
(*) Denmark: infringements prosecuted (**) France :  includes passenger transport. See Annexes 7.2 and 7.3 for details of
(***) Includes passenger transport infringements detected.

ANNEX 2
REGULAR PASSENGER TRANSPORT (infringements)1982
B*)EK**) D
Nat.For.Nat.For.Nat.For.
a) Art. 6 1
b) Art. 7.1
(Art. 6) 175
Art. 7.2
(Art. 6) 188
Art. 7.4
(Art. 6) 9
Art. 7.1
(not Art.6) 297
Art. 7.2
(not Art.6) 314
Art. 7.4
(not Art.6) 16
c) Art. 8 1369
d) Art. 11.2 3 13945
e) Art. 12
f) Art. 14.1
Art. 14.2
Art. 14 (others)
g) Art. 15.1 56
Art. 15.2
h) others
(Reg. 1463/70) 106551
TOTAL 3 2396105
Total Nat. + Fear.
Prosecutions
Penalties3
32501F IRL I L NL UK
Nat. For. Nat. For. Nat. Bor.Nat.For.Nat.For.Nat.For.
8431
132193
2
3911 21
8
74965 16
15
18
5 5220 98 181
6224 224
6448264
264
(*) Belgium (see Annex 3) (**) Denmark : infringements prosecuted

ANNEX 3
OCCASIONAL PASSENGER TRANSPORT (  infringements)1982
a) Art. 6
b) Art. 7.1
(Art. 6) 
Art. 7.2 
(Art. 6) 
Art. 7.4 
(Art. 6) 
Art. 7.1 
(not Art.6)  
Art. 7.2 
(not Art.6)  
Art. 7.4 
(not Art.6)
c) Art. 8
d) Art. 11.2
e) Art.
f) Art.
Art.
Art.
g) Art.
Art.
h)12
14.1
14.2
14 (others)
15.1
15.2 
others
(Reg. 1463/70)
— ,p"n v'tv i............To
tal Nat.  + For.
Prosecutions
Penalties“ K e " 3*
115jyU^6i4/U83 5 "UK (*)
1^343 iJ ibl?572  
214 415
314
(*) Belgium and United Kingdom: includes regular passenger transport.B ( *) DK D F IRL ][ I NL lJK (*)
Nat.
5
6 
7
92For.
1
1
1
33Nat.For.Nat.
232
319
15
374
435
51
212
762
85
15
1406For.
26
23 
14 
69 
79
24 
45 
85 
29
314N a t .For. N a t .
35For. N a t .For. N a t .For.Nat.
24
65
128
10
1103For.
1
3
3 
2
4Nat.
40 
124
7
31
284
296
294
341
13
22
26
41For.
6
10
10
1
13
12
1

ANNEX 4
GERMANY  
Infringements in 1982
Goods Passengers
Article Regular Occasional
Nat.For.Nat.For.Nat. For .
Reg.(EEC) 543/69
6 167 51 1---
(Art. 7.1 8.465 934175 —23226
6) 7.2 15.469 1.398 188 -31923
7.4 310 81 9 1514
(  not 7.1 4.329 178297 —37469
Art. 7.3 4.985 183314 -435 79
6) 7.4 326 5316 5124
8 4.637 654136 921245
11.1 8.834 792 ----
11.2 --13945 76285
12 212 67--8529
15.1 974656- 15-
15.5 147 516213 ——
Reg.(EEC) 1463/70
15 5.137 564_ 15546
16 738 23--86-
17 23.665 1.648 992221.088 223
18 572 691116 7745
TOTAL 78.050 6.7922.396 1053.906 708

ANNEX 5.1
N E T H E R L A N D S
Infringements in 1982
Non-
J^yf _ BDK D FIRL ILNL UKMember TOTAL
Countri^ iS
7.1 168 24 62 29 2 30 2.775 610 3.106
7.2/3
7.4
11.1212
2
23837
38108
12248
1
632
231
301
14.548
12
4.4075
721
225.013
15
4.930
11.2
11.3
11.4 
12.1 
12.3 
14.143
2
24• “
-7-149
5
214
20
2
33- 7
1
6152
7
256
20
2
34
614.2
15.1
15.5
16 968 36188 33-
62-15
18
19.527 33015
18
20.847
infr. to  
Reg.  1463/7( )
TOTAL 1.588 139 509 174 6 160 231.725 21 9734.421

ANNEX 5.2 I
NETHERLANDS
1982
Total number of official reports drawn up and amount of penalties for  
goods and passenger transport operations, by nationality:
COUNTRYOfficia.
reportInfringe­
mentsPenalties
HFL. Including :
NETHERLANDS 8.173 31.725 1.732.075451 cases in which no  
action taken
BELGIUM 278 1.588 13.475 14 cases in which no  
action taken  
178 cases transferred
DENMARK 36 139 35 cases in which no  
action taken  
1 case transferred
GERMANY 122 509 7.510 76 cases in which no  
action taken  
19 cases transferred
UNITED
KINGDOM6 21 — 6 cases in which no  
action taken
FRANCE 50 174 2.275 26 cases in which no  
action taken  
12 cases transferred
IRELAND 2 6 250 1 case in which no  
action taken
ITALY 34 160 70028 cases in which no  
no action taken  
1 case transferred
LUXEMBOURG 1 2 — 1 case in which no  
action taken
Other
countries34 97 2.075 25 cases in which no 
action taken
TOTAL 8.736 34.421 1.758.360 663 cases in which no  
action taken
211 cases transferred to  
the foreign authori­
ties responsible
(*) To this should be added 177 official reports of infringements  
committed by Dutch drivers abroad (Belgium and France); in 16 of these  
cases no action was taken. The total value of penalties imposed as a  
result of these 177 official reports amounts to HFL 21 280.

Annex 6
ITALY
Infringements detected in 1982
Regulation (EEC) No. 543/69
InfringementGoods
transportPassenger
transport
TOTAL
Nationals Foreigners Nationals Foreigners
Article 5 6.328 1.765 5.220 98 13.411
Article 6 947 452 84 31 1.514
Articles 7-8 11.926 2.011 132 19 14.088
Articles 11-12 2.716 413 39 11 3.179
Articles 14-15 94.262 4.300 749 65 99.376
TOTAL 116.179 8.941 6.224 224 131.568

AMNFH 7.1
F R  A  if C  F 
1 9  0  2
A) Roadside checks :
Humber of crews checked 679.320
Humber of discs analysed 2.327.030
number of infringements detected 144.771
Humber of infringements prosecuted 109.062
nationalityHumber of infringe­
ments detectedNumber of infringe­
ments followed up 
with official reports
France 134.639 103.453
Germany 1.825 1.117
Pelyium 2.230 1.320
T'enmark 64 36
United Kingdom 952 293
Netherlands 982 506
Luxembourg 156 64
Italy 2.319 1.186
Ireland 95 35
Greece 15 11
Non-member countries 1.494 1.041
TOTAL 144.771 109.062

ANNEX 7.2
1' P. A N C E 
1902
B) Checks at operators' premises
D  Overall indicators
Number of crews checked42.214
Number of discs analysed (1)437.906
Number of infringements detected (2)297.907
Number of infringements on which 
action taken42.596
(D Total of all discs analysed by hand or otherwise by appropriate
f mistry of Transport department (Transport Inspectors and Factory 
Inspectors (Transport)). '  1
(2) Including selector switching errors.
^ ^ Breakdown of infringements of Regulation (EEC) No.543/69
Exceeding maximum 
driving periodcontinuous 19.564
daily25.332
weekly2.359
over 14 days1.002
Inadequate or no daily rest period47.950
T 0 T A L96.295

FRANCE
] 982
Checks at operators' premises (continued)
3 ) Breakdown of infringements of Regulation (EF,C) No. 1463/70
Failure to keep discs 1.993
Use of unsuitable or non-approved discs 664
Incomplete data on record sheets / 
centre of discs not filled in 2.606
Selector switching error 196.444
TOTAL 201.692

ANNEX 7.4
F R A M C E 
19C2
c ) Penalties imposed by the Courts in 19G2 (1)
Fines
Amount (FF) Number O ,t j
Less than FF SO 19 13.1
FF SO to FF 159 3.703 25.4
FF 160 to FF 299 3.090 21.1
FF 300 to FF 599 3.903 26.7
FF 600 to FF 799 1.407 9.6
FF S00 to FF 999325 4. ·  w
FF 1.000 or more279 1.9
TOTAL 14.621 100 2
(1) Action taken on official reports drawn up by the factory inspectors 
(trans£j°rt) and road traffic controllers. The action taken on 
official reports drawn up by other inspectors (police/gendarinerie)  
is not known.

AM HEX f l .  1
UNITED KINGDOM
VEHICLE? INSPECTED - 1902 
GOODS
UK Br>isDICFGPIIRL LML(*)TOTAL
199.746 9411.747 4454.64 5 757563.065 343.2111.953216.620
p ? \ n e, yop^ypp c
UK BDDKFGPIIRL LML(*)TOTAL
10.795 19109151272322800872719.304
(*) Mon-member countries

i
UHITEP KINGDOM - Infringements 1982 3·?-
goods
UKPDEKFGRIIRLLNL(*)TOTAL
AFT 6 
ART 7.1 
APT 7.2 
AFT 7.4 
ART a 
AFT 11 
ART 12 
ART 14.1 
ART 14.2 
ART 14.7 
AFT 15 
1463/7082
458
674
124
690
494
368
1.237
4.561
421
434
79111
3
1
5
4 
2 
37 
9
8 
2 
4 
9 
2 
11
1
4
1464
50
3 
49
4 
17 
25
8
7
215
12
7
1
2
4
1
2
21
6
33
1
7
27
57
151
12
6
93
1 .
15
14
Π
1
2
28
44
4
1
3
1
.11
22
ο
583 
560 
GOO 
125 
703 
608 
377 
1.336 
4.817
454
455 
804
TOTALS 10.334 2942202291363105625211.112
(*) = Non-member countries
PASSENGERS
ART 6
AIT1  7.1 
ART 7.2 
ART 7.440
124
71
24
2
105 1146
134
17
32
297
296
306
342
13
40
41ART 8 
ART 11 
AFT 12 
ART 14.1 
ART 14.2 
AFT 14.731
204
296
294
341
131
14112
24
11
AFT 15 
1463/7048
41
TOTALS 1.519 253309-2--21.572

AMTTER 0.3.
UMITEP KITTGPOF - Penalties - 1982 
GOODE
Oral Viritten Prohibitions Offences TOTAL
learnings Darnings on Movanent Prosecuted Fines £
APT 6 2 3 6 19 764
APT 7.1 213 7 7 64 1.. 683
7.2 223 10 55 373 10.089
7 .A 35 2 7 60 1.375
ART 0 333 2 2 5 115
ART 11 118 15 32 223 4.858
APT 12 53 1o 83 2.512
ART 14.1 540 134 .10 190 5.260
14.22.434 278 33 1.186 30.047
14.7 15 10 1 85 2.631
ART 15 46 17 327
1463/70 483 114 18 189 12.100
TOTALS 4.555 507 185 2.494 71.766
r.^rci
ART 6 14 165
ART 7.1 23 35 1.168
7.2 19 3 2 12 868
7.4 11 £ 65
A^T 8 27
ART 11 23r7 46 3.021
ART 12 15 1 3 50 3.961
ART 14.1 57 6 1 24 2.097
14.2 159 21 102 4.234
14.7 6 645
ART 15 8 9 500
1463/70 19 14 320
TOTALS 363 39 13 314 16.079