ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
To adequately address the objectives of the ITS revision, three policy options (POs) have been assessed for their economic, social and environmental impacts. All options include: (i) strengthening the coordination and deployment principles; and (ii) expanding the ITS Directive operation in new and emerging ITS service areas (the basis of PO1). Additionally, stakeholder cooperation is institutionalised in all POs through measures to improve coordination and ensure the coherence of the Directive’s provisions with those of other existing legal instruments. PO2 also aims at mandating the availability and accessibility of crucial data. This represents a step change to improve data quality, data access, data exchange, and data use for the operation of ITS services. PO3 goes further by: (i) aiming to mandate the provision of essential ITS services, capitalising on the increased availability, quality, exchange and use of data in PO2, while (ii) aiming to further support the deployment of interoperable and continuous services, particularly those focused on road safety. PO3 is the preferred policy option, as it is the most ambitious and most effective option, best achieves the specific objectives of the ITS Directive, and best ensures the swift and coherent deployment of ITS services.
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— for Bayer: publicly-traded management holding company of the Bayer Group. The Bayer Group is a diversified international organisation active in four core business areas: pharmaceuticals, consumer health, agriculture and animal health,

— for Monsanto: publicly-traded US multinational agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology corporation.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 220/53

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8465 — Vivendi/Telecom Italia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 220/05)

On 30 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8465. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 232/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8487 — Lone Star/Nani Holdings/Novo Banco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 232/04)

On 7 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8487. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8422 — ChemChina/AKC/JVs, to the following address:
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— for Brookfield: global asset manager whose portfolio is focused on property, renewable power, infrastructure and private equity,

— for Engie: global player active across the entire energy value chain in the fields of gas, electricity and energy services,

— for FHHGL: owns and operates two pumped storage electricity assets in Wales (United Kingdom) and is active in the wholesale supply of electricity. It is currently jointly controlled by Engie and Mitsui Power Ventures Limited.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 238/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8354 — Fox/Sky)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 238/01)

On 7 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8354. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 253/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8537 — Moody’s/Bureau Van Dijk Electronic Publishing)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 253/01)

On 28 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8537. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— for APG: is the asset management business unit of APG GROEP N.V., a collective pensions scheme provider. APG carries out the executive consultancy, asset management, pension administration and communication for pension funds in the field of collective pensions, for around 4,5 million Dutch citizens,

— for the Portfolio: consisting of DIF’s interest in forty eight companies/projects active in the infrastructure sector in Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, and the UK.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 271/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8582 — Letterone/Holland & Barrett)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 271/02)

On 10 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8582. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— For Advent International Corporation: private equity investment, focused on the acquisition of equity stakes and the management of investment funds in various sectors, including business and financial services; industrial goods and services; retail operations, branded consumer goods, and leisure services; media, telecommunications, and information technology; and healthcare services and pharmaceuticals.

— For Industrial Parts Holding: distribution of industrial parts by providing a logistic link between suppliers and customers in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain and Switzerland through ten autonomous commercial networks.
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8513 — Infineon Technologies/SAIC Motor/JV, to the following address:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 278/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8512 — A.P. Moller Maersk/Danske Bank/Gatetu)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 278/02)

On 16 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8512. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 292/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8587 — Bridgepoint/Groupe Primonial)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 292/05)

On 30 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8587. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— for Balder: listed real estate company which owns, manages and develops residential and commercial properties and hotels in Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland,

— for Varma: mutual pension insurance company, owned by its client companies and self-employed persons, insured employees and owners of the guarantee capital. Varma notably invests in Finnish real estate companies,

— for Serena: a real estate company active in the Finnish real estate market for commercial use and specialising in retail properties such as grocery stores and discounters.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 301/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8408 — Cinven/CPPIB/Travel Holdings Parent Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 301/02)

On 22 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8408. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8523 — BD/Bard, to the following address:
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8624 — Michael Kors/Jimmy Choo, to the following address:
On 7 September 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Unibail-Rodamco SE (‘Unibail-Rodamco’, France), belonging to the group Unibail Rodamco

— Commerz Real Investmentgesellschaft mbH (‘Commerz Real Investmentgesellschaft mbH’, Germany),

— CGI Metropole, s.r.o. (‘CGI Metropole’, Czech Republic).

Unibail-Rodamco and Commerz Real Investmentgesellschaft acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of CGI Metropole.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 331/1

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.8580 — Mirova/Comsa/PGGM/Mas d’Enric Prison/Terrassa and la Bisbal Courts/Albali)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 331/01)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 8 September 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between Mirova, Comsa, PGGM, Mas d’Enric Prison, Terrassa and la Bisbal Courts and Albali. On 27 September 2017, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.
On 18 September 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Borealis Smart Holdings BV (the Netherlands), belonging to Borealis European Holdings BV and controlled by Omers Administration Corporation (Canada),

— Ontario Limited (Canada), belonging to the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (Canada),

— SSE Maple Limited (United Kingdom), belonging to SSE plc (United Kingdom),

— Maple TopCo Limited (United Kingdom).

SSE Plc (‘SSE’), the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (‘OTPP’) and Borealis European Holdings BV (‘Borealis’) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Maple Topco Limited (‘Maple’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of contract of management or any other means.
On 4 October 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Robert Bosch GmbH (‘Bosch’, Germany),

— HUAYU Automotive Systems Company Ltd (‘HASCO’, China), controlled through SAIC Motor Corporation by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of Shanghai Municipal Government,

— Bosch Automobile Steering (Nanjing) Co., Ltd (‘ASCN’, China), controlled by Bosch.

Bosch and HASCO — through their joint venture Bosch HUAYU Steering Systems Co., Ltd — acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of ASCN.

The concentration is accomplished by way of a purchase of shares.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 337/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8309 — Volvo Car Corporation/First Rent A Car)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 337/04)

On 26 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8309. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
On 10 October 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Arbejdsmarkedets Tillaegspension (ATP, Denmark),

— Ontario Teacher’s Pension Plan Board (OTPP, Canada),

— Copenhagen Airports A/S (CPH, Denmark).

ATP and OTPP acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of CPH.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8631 — IFM/PSA/Mersin)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 346/06)

On 29 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8631. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 358/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8608 — ENGIE/La Caisse des dépôts et consignations/CEOLFALRAM76)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 358/03)

On 18 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8608. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
On 13 October 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Athene Holding Ltd (‘Athene Holding’, US), belonging to the group Apollo Management LP (‘Apollo’, US)

— Aegon Ireland plc (‘Aegon Ireland’, Ireland),

Athene Holding acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Aegon Ireland.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 377/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7764 — EDF/Areva reactor business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 377/05)

On 29 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M7764. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
On 20 October 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Continental Automotive Holding Netherlands BV (‘Continental’, The Netherlands), a subsidiary of Continental AG, Germany,

— Alstom Holdings (‘Alstom’, France),

— EasyMile (‘EasyMile’, France).

Continental and Alstom acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of EasyMile.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 398/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8518 — MDP/HPS/Nevada/Towergate)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 398/02)

On 15 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8518. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.