ARCHIVESHISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(77)698
Vol.1977/0220

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement(CEE,Euratom)n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernantl'ouvertureaupublicdesarchiveshistoriquesdelaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement(CE,Euratom)n°1700/2003du22septembre2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003,p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation(EEC,Euratom)No354/83of1February1983
concerningtheopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropeanEconomic
Community andtheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983,p.1),as
amendedbyRegulation(EC,Euratom)No1700/2003of22September2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003,p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary,classifieddocuments inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformitywithArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung(EWG,Euratom)Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar1983überdieFreigabederhistorischen ArchivederEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom)Nr.1700/2003vom22.September2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003,S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich.Soweit
erforderlich,wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenanntenVerordnungfreigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COM(77)698final.
Brussels,22December1977
I
ReportontheRadiationProtection Programme
Thisreporthas"beenestablished inapplicationofArticle4of
theCouncilDecisionof15March1976adoptingaresearchand
trainingprogramme(1976to1980)fortheEuropeanAtomicEnergy
Communityinthefieldofbiology–healthprotection(radiation
protectionprogramme).
COM(77)698final

REPORTONTHERADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAMME
1.Introduction
OnMarch15,1976,theCounciladoptedaresearchandtrainingprogramme
fortheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunityinthefieldofbiology--health
protection (Radiationprotection programme 1976-80).
Article4ofthedecisionreadsasfollows:"TheCommission shallbe
responsible forthe.continuous supervision oftheimplementation ofthe
programmeinordertoensurethatrealcoordination hasbeenachieved
andtodecidewhetherdevelopments inthesituationorunforeseen research
resultsnecessitate changestotheprogramme .-Tothisenditwillreport
totheCouncilandtotheEuropeanParliament attheendofthesecond
yearoftheprogramme andwillpropose,whereappropriate,anyamendments
necessary".
Thepresentreportisintendedtocomplywiththisarticle.
2.TheRadiationProtection programmeofEuratom
2.1.Objectives
Thepreparation ofbasicsafetystandardsforprotection against
ionizingradiationsisoneofthetasksincumbent ontheCommission
pursuanttotheEuratomTreaty.Theforeseeable increaseintheuse
ofenergyofnuclearorigin,includingtheprobableuseofthermo­
nuclearfusioninamoredistantfuture,thehandlingofwaste,
effluentandfuelsthroughouttheircyclesandthevarioususesof
ionizingradiation andradioisotopes ,areallfactorscallingfor
adequateprevention andcontrolmeasures.
Theroleofthisscientific researchprogrammeistosupplysufficient
information tocontributetotheshapingofappropriate decisions on
issuesaboutwhichpublicopinionhasbecomeverysensitive.
Therefore,theradiationprotection programmeoftheCommunityis
designedtogainadequateunderstanding andcontrolofthepossible
radiationhazardsencountered,withtwomainobjectives :
-improvement ofscientific andtechnicalknowledgewithaviewto

Layingdownradiationprotection standards andguaranteeing
adequateprotectionforworkersandthegeneralpublic;
-evaluation ofthebiological andecological consequences of
nuclearactivities andoftheuseofnuclearenergyandionizing
radiation,inordertoensureanadequateprotection ofmanand
thevariouscomponents oftheenvironment .
2.2.Problems andresults
2.2.1.Historically radiationprotection researchhasstartedto
occupytheattentionofexpertswhenthree-quarters ofa
centuf.yago,thepioneersofionizingradiations,medical
doctorsandscientists withoutasufficient knowledgeof
radiationhazards,encountered seriousandunforeseen
consequences .Itwasthenowingtoasteadybuild-upof
radiobiological researchresultsthatthefirstprocedures
forradiationprotection wereadoptedhalfacenturyago.
Amongthosewhobenefitted fromthisnewlyacquiredknowledge
werethepatientswhohadtoundergomedicalradiationdiagnosis
andtreatment.Duringthelasttwentyfiveyears,legislation
onradiationprotection hasbeencontinuously amendedaccordingto
theimprovedknowledgeoftheeffectsofionizingradiations
andradioisotopes .

-3-
TheRadiation Protection programme ofthe Community
endeavours ,throuqh aco-operative European effort ,
toincrease our ..knowledge while taking into account
Darticular Droblems andcompetences existing in
EuroDe ,aswell asresearch carried outelsewhere in
the world .
Theprogramme isdivided into sixsectors which arbitrarily -
butconveniently -serve toindicate itsoverall structure .
They are :
-theradioactive contamination oftheenvironment ,
-thehereditary effects ofionizing radiation ,
-the short-term somatic effects ofionizing radiation ,
-the long-term somatic effects ofionizing radiation ,
-radiation measurement and itsinterpretation ,personnel
dosimetry ,
-assessment ofradiation hazards .
2.2.2 .Itisimpossible togive inthepresent report acomprehensive
review oftheresults obtained intheprogramme .Nevertheless ,
afew recent achievements with anevident practical importance
can beoutlined asexamples :
-Theimportance ofplutonium behaviour andradiotoxi city is
well known and hasbeen given much attention .The "resuspension "
and "inhalation "pathways still require further study .If
released into theenvironment ,plutonium does notseem topass
upeasily through thevarious stages offood chains ,and is
notreadily taken upfrom them byhumans .Americium ,curium
andother transuranic elements could well behave differently
inthis respect however andbeimportant asfarasingestion
isconcerned .
t
-The importance of .tritium isemphasised byitsincreased use
inindustries ,itsconsiderable production insome fission
reactors ,andbythepossible future operation offusion
machines ,which will contain avery large inventory ofthis
isotope .
–- - –" . ./.

-4-
Thewaytritium distributes intheenvironment andits
biological effects have been studied inorder tokeep dose
commitments andeffects under control .Nevertheless ,there
arestill certain problems ofdose commitment related to
particular pathways andoflong-term effects oftritium as
well asother radionuclides incorporated inliving matter
which deserve tobestudied .
-There are some experimental clues about apossible synergist
between radiation andchemicals which 'are notusually carcinogenic
These combined effects seem tobehigher than those ofradiation
alone ,dependent onthedose level ofradiation and the
concentration ofthechemicals .This finding isimportant
enough tostimulate further research .
-Afast neutron dose aslowas0,1 radinduces astatistically
significant increase inthedevelopment ofmammary tumours in
rats .This was shown byarefined statistical analysis of
experimental data .The relative biological effectiveness
(RBE )ofthese neutrons seems tobemuch higher atlowdoses
than assumed hitherto .Athigher doses ,the RBEdecreases
tothevalues already known asisconsistent with atheory
ofdual radiation action .
-Themolecular basis ofsensitivity and repair ofthegenetic
material has been determined onlower forms oflife .
Through theisolation andcharacterization ofseveral human
cell mutants ,afuller understanding oftheways inwhich the
human cell deals with radio-induced heritable damage hasbpen
achieved .
-Techniques have been developed which allow thelocalization .
ofDNArepair genes inmanthrough thetransfer ofhuman
chromosomes inChinese hamster cells and inhuman -Chinese
hamster hybrid cells .
-Thedamage induced inhuman ovaries have been evaluated in
individuals whoreceived therapeutical irradiation for
abdominal tumours .

Theroleofseveralfactors,includingtypeofradiation and
environmental circumstances duringirradiation,ontherateof
inductionofgeneticdamagehasbeenstudied.Theoccurence
ofanadditional chromosome inhumansleadstodisordersspeci­
fictotheidentityoftheadditional chromosome present,which
maybetheoriginofconsiderable socialhardship.Themanner
throughwhichirradiation inducessuchaphenomenonisbeing
exploredinexperimental animalsandthedose-response rela­
tionshipafterX-irradiation hasbeenestablishedforanomalies
inthedistribution ofthesex-chromosome inmammaliangermcells.
Co-operative researchinradiationprotection dependslargelyonthe
successofstandardization ofexperimental methodsandmaterials.
Thereforedosimetric intercompari sonshavebeencarriedoutin
variouswayse.g.onpersonneldosimeters aswellasonX-ray
dosimeters andrecentlywithneutrons.Alloftheseinter-
comparisons haverevealedquiteanumberofimperfections in
experimental arrangements andtheirexecution hasinduceda
considerable improvement inresearchprocedures,andincreased
thereliability ofthemeasurements . •
Asimilareffortbutadaptedspeciallytolateeffectsresearch
hasbeenpromotedwithinEULEP(EuropeanLateEffectsProject
Group)firstfordosimetry,thenforthehandlingoflaboratory ■
animals,andfinallyfor.theinterpretation ofpathological
observations .Fordifferentobservers,themicroscopic
examination ofthesametissuemay,incertaincases,yielddifferent
conclusions .However,whenthequestionisraisedtoknow,
forexample,ifagivendoseofradiationproducesinanimalsa
certainpercentage ofmammarytumours,itisessentialthatin
Munich,inLondon,inParisorinBrussels,oneisdealingwith
thesamedoseofradiation,giventosimilaranimals,treatedin
thesamewayandobservedaccordingtothesamecriteria.
Aftertotalbodyirradiation atrelatively highdose,thestem
cellsofthehemapoietic systemarethefirsttoshowsevere
damage.Thesecellsaretheprecursors oftheredbloodcells,the
platelets andthewhitebloodcellswhichareresponsible respectively
forthetransportofoxygen,thecoagulation ofthebloodandthe
.

defenceagainstinfection.Inman,thestemcellsarepresentG
inthebonemarow.Inprinciple,thetransplantation ofa
certainamountofmarrowfromahealthydonorshouldcure
theheavilyirradiatedindividual.Inpracticehowever,this
I
procedurepresentsmanydifficulties whichareprogressively
beingovercomebyacontinuous researcheffort.Forexample,
thedonorandtheacceptorneedtobegenetically ascloseas
possible;otherwise,thetransplanted marrowreactsagainst
therecipient andmightevenkillhiiti.Noticeable progresshas
nowbeenachievedinselectingthedonorandinmitigating the
"graftversushost"reaction.
TheCommunityresearchprogrammeissufficiently flexibletobeadapted "
continuously tonewdevelopments andresultssuchasthoselistedabove.
Whenevernecessary,theycanbetakenupthroughreorientation ofongoing
researchorinclusionintheprogramme.
Implementation
Radiationprotection researchpresents agreatnumberofdifferentscientific
aspects.Throughout thememberstatesthereareresearchgroupswhichhave
particular andspecificcompetences inthatarea.Ontheotherhand,as
resourcesareindeedlimited,co-operative actionandanorganizeddistribution
oftasksareimperative .Therefore,sincetheverybeginningoftheprogramme,
theCommission hasendeavoured toinitiateco-operation withtheappropriate
nationalinstitutes onworkconcerning thevariousfocalpointsoftheprogramme.
Theresultsoftheseeffortsareevidenced bythefactthataboutall(18)
nationalresearchinstitutions activeinthisfieldand50universityinstitutes
aretobefoundamongtheCommission'scontractpartners.
About500scientists arecurrentlyparticipating intheworkonover230
projects/obtaining acoherentpictureofproblemsinradiationprotection.The
appropriate meansforitsexecutionarethecost-shared contracts,whichthe
Commission hasconcludedwithuniversities CA9contracts),nationalresearch
institutions andradiobiological institutesofnuclearcenters(57contracts)and
(*)500full-time andpart-timescientists,corresponding to270scientists/year.

-7-
withotherscientificorganisations ,includingalsogroupcontractswith
severalinstitutes (16contracts).Furthermore theCommission'sBiology
groupatIspraisdirectlyinvolvedintheprogramme.(Appendix 1).
Theoverallcostofthisworkin1977is16millionu.a.inwhichtheCommis­
sionparticipates withashareofabout35%.Whencomparedwiththetotal
expenditures ofthememberstatesinradiationprotection researchestimated
for1977at60to70millionu.a.,these16millionu.a.spentonresearch
coveredbytheCommission'sprogrammerepresent asignificant andimportant
part.
4.Coordination '
Duringtheprecedingprogrammesscientific co-operation betweenthecontractual
partnershasbeenestablished,whichhassubstantially improvedthepotential
ofeachofthem.Coherence andcoordination oftheiractivities havebeen
pursuedthroughseveralmeans:-theAdvisoryCommittee onProgramme Manage­
ment"RadiationProtection"(ACPM),-regularmeetingsofstudygroupsand
expertsonallmajorsubjects,-theorganization ofseminarsandtheactivity
oftheCommission'sservices.
TheACPM,withits4meetingsin1976/77hasadvisedontheconductofthe
programme,andensuredacloseliai<sonwiththecorresponding researchand
development workcarriedoutinthememberstates.Thebestpossibleimplemen­
tationisamainconcernoftheACPMwhenitevaluatesresearchproposals and
advisesabouttheirintegration intotheprogramme andtheselectionoflabora­
toriestowhichtheworkistobeentrusted .Resultsachievedareexamined
annuallywhentheCommission presentstheAnnualProgressReporton"Radiation
Protection"summarising theresultsofallcontracts andoftheBiologygroup
<
atIspra.Futureguidelines or.reorientations ofcontractsareproposedwhen
discussing theworkprogrammeofeachcomingyear.Evidently,owingtothe
nationalstatusofitsmembers,theACPMexercisesdirectlyitsinfluence on
theexecutionoftheCommission'sRadiationProtection programme andindirectly
onthoseofthememberstates.
i
Thebasisforthepreparation ofdecisionsaretheresultsofstudygroups
andexpertsopinion.About40studygroups,steeringcommittees andother
meetings,withmorethan1000participants ,takeplaceeveryyear.

Therelations andcontactswith.scientistsandinstitutes involvedin
radiationnrotection research havealsnachievpH aH<?fartncoordination .
.....· ι
ofmuchpf•theresearchinwhichtheCommunity doesnotparticipate financially .
ι1 .
5.Utilisation anddissemination ofresults
Thescientific researchresultsoftheEuropeanCommunities' Radiation
Protection programmeareavailabletoallparticipants ,memberstatesand
.it' 1. I ••
scientists.TheyareusedbytheCommissioninestablishing "basicsafety
standardsforthehealthprotectionofthegeneralpublicandworkersagainst
,.....,.,-..*)dangersofionisingradiationfortheCommunity,onwhicharebasedthecor­
responding lawsofthememberstates.Ontheinternational level,theyplay
theirroleintheformulation ofrecommendations byICRP,ortheyareused
inthecompilation andevaluationofthelatestdatawhich ,provideaworld­
wideinformation basisforradiationprotection (UNSCEAR).
•1•i1'1,'
Theresultsthemselves arepresentedinarticlespublishedinscientific
journals,!inEuratomreports,inmonographsissuedbytheCommission,andin
theproceedings ofsymposiaandseminars.Morethan400suchpublications
havebeenproducedin'1976.Suchahighnumberofpublications initself
stimulates d'continuous coordinativeeffect.1" '
•I 111H1I(
6.Budgetarysituation
Two.factorst ,couldstronglyinfluencethebudgetary .situationoftheprogramme :
thefutureintroduction oftheEuropeanunitofaccountiand theapplication
ofestimates ,ofgrossstaffexpenditure . i; i...
II ..1..1IIIIι-IιI,.·,I■I'. ι ·.ι!II■ 1'
Bothareprocedures whichcouldnotbetakenintoaccountwhentheprogramme
i••.i.jIi.I.ili■ i :1'!)•
waspresentedin1975.Theychangethecalculation basisofseveralbudgetary
itemsoftheprogrammewithoutbeinglinkedtotheprogrammeitselforwithout
1Ilì' ..MI,'li!'t "■ .1 •I
beingopentoinfluencebyappropriate actionsofcontractors andCommission's
I|| I'Mill [IIii>. . > *
services.TheCommissionwillthereforeevaluatetheirinfluence onthebudget
■i.}.11 i•-i• »1'»'.i**'• ..
ofthe(programmeandpropose,ifnecessary,adaptationsoftheestimated
expenditures withthepresentation ofthe1979budget.ii, i,lIii»III;.1i.■,i;l.; IIi iii|•Ii 1'1
i.•• ;itli-iiimi'iii-
i,i'iIi1i11''j'I■}1•;•I••i4. ;•Ilu'i■"':IIt'.1i
0Jn°,L187,.12/7/1976,p.1-44 ,;,,i ■,
**)International Commission onRadiological Protection***)UhitedNdtlohesScientific Committee ontheEffectsofAtomicRadiation

-9-
nclusions
Thescientific contentoftheprogrammeiswellbalancedasbetweenits
differentcomponents (listedunder2.2.1.5.'Contractual relationshave
beenestablished withmoreorlessallinstitutesactivelyworkingin
radiationprotection research.Thusaconsiderable directandindirect
coordinative influence ontheoverallactivities inradiationprotection
intheCommunityisensured.
-TheACPMadvisestheCommissioneffectively intheimplementation ofthe
programme,supervisestheprogressbeingmade,supportscoordination
effortsandproposes-whereappropriate-adaptations toscientific progress
andchangingsituations .
-ThecontinuedexecutionoftheprogrammeaccordingtotheCouncildecision
willprovidescientific knowledgeenablingthe"SafetyStandards"tobe
adaptedtoprogressandexperience,andprovidingauthorities empoweredto
takedecisionswithup-to-datescientific information onradiationprotection
problems,whichareonesonwhichpublicopinionisparticularly sensitive.
-Noamendmentofthegeneralscientific scopeoftheprogrammeistherefore
necessary .
-Thepossibleinfluenceofadministrative andotherprocedures onthebudget
willbeevaluated.Itmightnecessitate adaptations tobeproposedinthe
197yDuugettoeliminatetheirinfluence ontheexecutionofthecontractual
programme .

-10-
APPENDIX 3
Listofresearchcontractsclassified asregards
-thesectorsoftheprogramme
-aridthedetailedresearchsubjects.

.Dosimetne
Dosimetry
Dosimétrie
TNO ,Rijswijk (Barendsen /Broerse )
Univ .Toulouse (Blanc )
GSF ,Neuherberg (Jacobi /Burger )
Univ .Strasbourg (Rechenmann )
Univ .Homburg (Muth/Grillmaier )
NRPB ,Harwell (Dolphin )
CEGB ,Berkeley .(Wheatley )
NPL ,Teddington (Lewis )
CEA ,CENFontenay -aux-Roses (Parmentier )
KFA ,Jiilich (Feinendegen )
CNEN ,CSNCasaccia (Silini )
Univ .Wûrzburg (Kellerer )
PTB ,Braunschweig (Reich )
Univ .Dundee (Watt )
CEA ,CENGrenoble (DeChoudens )
Univ .Aberdeen (Mallard )
CENDOS (Broerse etal.)
ICRU (Wyckoff )
ITAL ,Wageningen (Sybenga )
AERE ,Harwell (Peirson )
EULEP (Duplan etal.)
CNEN ,Bologna (Busuoli )
GSF ,Neuherberg (Jacobi /Burger )
Univ .Toulouse (Blanc )
AERE ,Harwell (Peirson )
CEGB ,Berkeley (Wheatley )
CEA ,CENFontenay -aux-Roses (Portai )
PTB ,Braunschweig (Wagner )
KFA ,Jiilich (Heinzelmann )«
§>,
■p
--H
>> i-tua
*»3
t>c
•H«
wo
o-H
•a
o<o
h-H
O"O
•H «tShU
+*
o
B
•H
<0
o
*0
C
oU
4->
3
Oz(0
0)
o
ft
>
0)
-p
c
s
4>
3
10
ri
0)S(5
a
'O
>»
•P
0)
s
•H
(0
O
♦O
o
0)
<tf
CQ-oec
oo
•Hw
-p.H
td
(9a
ft
TJsuo
o
T3U
ca>
aj-P
•P CiW-H>>
U
4->
0)
E
•HbO
«C
o-H
rsu
oh4->
0)-H
ca«o
os
U>
^tJ
û>S3a.ajΓΠ XI
I Γ7
X X
X X - IX
"~ IX
X XI
I
X * iX
X ~ I
X X
X"" IX
X- X X
X
X
X
I- X
X X X X
X X X X x • X
X X
X X X
X
X
X
X
X
m» X
X
mm X
-

Radioaktive Kontammation der Umwelt
fiadioactive contamination ofthe environment
Contamination radioactive dumilieu
CNEN ,Fiascherino (Brondi )
MAFF ,Lowestoft (Mitchell )
Univ .Nantes /CEALaHague (Pieri )
ITAL ,Wageningen (Sybenga )
Inst .d'Hygiene etD'Epidémiologie
Bruxelles (Cantillon )
CEA,CEN Fontenay -aux-Roses (Bovardj
CEN ,Mol (Kirchmann )
Landbouw Hogeschool ,Wageningen
(van denHoek )
AERE ,Harwell (Chamberlain )
Bundesgesundheitsamt ,Berlin (Stieve )
CEA ,CENCadarache (Grauby )
GSF ,Hannover (Kühn )
AERE ,Harwell (Chamberlain )
Univ .Louvain (Myttenaere )Marine
EnvironmentTerrestrial Environment
(d
<DTemperate
EcosystemsTerrestrial Ecosystems
naa
(hd
^+»
«m
■p s>>
•H (Ouo
(DOSWCO
V
(0
A
CO
•H
h
t–10
•H
cd
h
b0
as
o>>H alMmwm
<os
+> 0)
as+>sm
^5
mta
a>o
ho
PhW+
8
p»rt
•HO
+> .TJ
•H fn
U aiHOE3
•rla
o
■p
3H
CM2
■H !
ti )
o iM
imo
l-o
hO -rl
®-HH
j*-oO
+»(S3O«S
X
mm
m*
m*X
X
X
X
X
VX X
mm
X
ΜΒX
X
X
X
«a Μ X
XΛ
χ χ

.Genetische Wirkungen ionisierender Strahlen
Hereditary effects ofionizing radiations
Effets hereditaires desrayonnements ionisants
Univ .Aarhus (Marcker )
TNO/RULeiden (Rorsch )
TNO/RULeiden (Sobels )
TNO/RULeiden (van derEb)
TNO/RULeiden (van derEb)
Univ .Bruxelles (Brachet )
Univ .Dublin (Winder )
Univ .Galway (Houghton )
Univ .Galway (Houghton )
Univ .Rotterdam (Bootsma )
Univ .Leiden (Simons )
TNO ,Rijswijk (Lohman )
MRC ,Brighton (Bridges /Arlett )
Univ .Swansea (Parry )
Univ .Pisa (Loprieno )
Univ .Milano (Magni )
Fond .Curie ,Paris (Latarjet )
NRPB ,Harwell (Dolphin )
AERE ,Harwell (Peirson )
Univ .Pavia (Fraccaro )
INRA ,Dijon (Dalebroux )* I I I ■
>> 10c
fnO CO>>
-P-H •P 'O C <0
10-P •Η n«Η Ή 0)
•Η 0)♦Η> ο -Ρ
en cd*H 1 O C0 (D
0)ΦΛ-Ρ 0)Π·ΗΟ )>9Λ60 <υ·Η Μ•η+>ωιΗ oa> (0
ΟU (0 360α;ώώ +>> BOtJ S -p•haG •H Mo
■H fl«H <U asUa»ro ;3 (0-P C-Hm taota Oton 41 ΦΟ (0 •Η«Ρ
boPO •Pm
i E «rffH iv 1Μ ι 1 Ikuri v I I
EO 0)0)
(0 cri "MM
0) ■SPiS «H
3 οα> ωω
m d (hm ■dh p
CQ O C XJ CQO
m •Η (0 •Η oo <0dB hd> n 1S TJ-Pa -Ρ •π <0as 0)Vl
CQ4)- O o •-Ρ (0 +>«Η <0
I-riU' •H* ri -P ffi •Hrl <D (1)Φ οo fi IP 00 •Ρ ρ O Sh (Q Cd3 S I Ό 1
Jh <0 -PH CC !'n 3M OS CQ Π5 <!>Obû rHrH -Ρ nn 4) •HS (Q ^(0 S
•HU 3 <D 3 Ο·Η ■Ρ£> I0)Cd-H <0o oSoIoo jL*_J »<d |CQa jsa-p ICMXl *
x -
.X X X
!X X I X
X X
X X
X X X X X
X -, I
IΛ
... i
.IX Xte -
X
X
X
X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X X
X X
XLU

Univ.Toulouse(Delpoux)
CEN,Mol(Leonard)
CEN,Mol(Maisin)
CarlsbergLab»,Copenhagen(vonWettstein)
FinsenInstitute,Copenhagen (Faber)
Univ.Roma(Fasella/Whitehead)
PCL,London(Holt)-
Techno.Dublin(Taaffe/Malone)
Univ.Bruxelles (Radman)
Univ.Pavia(Falaschi)
CNRS,Gif-sur-Yvette(Devoret)
CNRS,Gif-sur-Yvette(Anagnostopoulos )
Univ.Roma(Olivieri)
Univ.Göttingen (Hansraann)
GSF,Frankfurt (Pohlit)
Univ.Louvain(Goffeau)
ITAL,Wageningen (Sybenga)
MRC,Harwell(Vennart)
CEA,Fontenay-aux-Roses(Lacourly)
ENEL,Roma(Farulla)
BiologyGroupIspra(Devreux)T3 I
>30}a
o«s
-Ρ·Η■Ρ T3d(0
m«pM'H β«Η·Ηο
•ΗΑ)■Η> <0Ο >Ρ
EAOS-h omο
0)θ)PN-P α>n-H0)>> φ COΛ60Φ-Η M•Η-Ρ60(Η Ο>υΜο 3o0O03cd ■Ρ·Η60Ο
ΟΌa •ρ•HC0.y ■ρC-H
•Ηβ«Η0) ΟUfl)tí3non •Η-ρmaotusO60tJ ωπο-pffi
60ΌΟι–)
Itr!QLi<u11] 1
Ito] IEM«HU
toftEΉ3 Ό0)Φcdraυ Ohcoh +> I
(0 o-esaTJUtao l
(0•Η 10 •ΗΟΟcas (4<υ miεΌ4->c -Ρ •Ηo«saiω«Ηνοα>ο ο•-Ρ •Η-Ρ«Η -O
I-H -•Η C-Pas CDHlu0)α>οoc3m .-Ρ 3OU•HC03ΒI*σhas-PH« ln3hmsoffi1)'
O601–1ι–Ι•ΡataΜ4)OEMbmS
•H(hΡΑ>3Ο·Η■ρΧ>•H<8-H<0OOISoΟΟSSTJw(d<υε+>Ο)ΌHPIL:J■L?_J
X
X
X XX
X X
X
X X X
X X
XX
X
X
X
X X
XX X
X
X
X X X
X X
χ.I-4
Χ I_ .IX
1X X ■ILU

k.Kurzzeitwirkungen ionisierender Strahlen
Short-term effects ofionizing radiations
Effets acourt terme desrayonneraents ionisants
Cl.Bernard ,Paris (Mathé )
M.Negri ,Milano (Garattini /Spreafico )
Univ .Ulm (Fliedner )
TNO ,Rijswijck (vanBekkum )
Univ .Bruxelles (Tagnon /Stryckmans )
GSF ,München (Thierfelder )
Univ .Dublin (Mullins /Greally )
CNEN ,CSNCasaccia (Doria )
Univ .Bruxelles (Dumont )
Univ .Louvain (Bazin )
Univ .Firenze (Becciolini )
Univ .Regensburg (Hüttermann )
Univ .Giessen (Lohmann )
MPI ,Mülheim (Schulte-Frohlinde /vonSonntag )
Univ .Newcastle (Scholes /Garner )
CEA ,CENGrenoble (Téoule )
Primary effects (Cramp etal.)
Univ .Homburg (Muth/Grillmaier )
KFA ,Jïilich (Feinendegen )
Univ .Bruxelles (Brachet )
GSF ,Neuherberg (Gossner /Hug)
Univ .London (Lindop )
MRC ,Harwell (Vennart )
Univ .Copenhagen (Dan?0>>H
k
ai
4)C0
-P
<HO
O0)
«M
D«H
οφ
•Η
•ΡΟ
(o'H
Ρ-ΡΗ (ΰ
aiS
>oWm
χ
χ
χ
χ
χ
χ
χC
0)
S
-Ρ
η)
φ
h<h ni
EHO(hΟ
•Η
-Ρ
α5
•Η
Τ*u
s
•n
αΉ
o
•Η
•P
*aJ
ο+>
UMkai
aiH
SP<
m
t)c
aai
oh
cq+>
X
X
X
Xh
φΛ
■ΡΟ
χ
χm
■ρ
υ
β>
Ρη
10
α
1–1
ai
o
•ri
bû
OH
O
a
s
Η
ε
χ
χ
χ
χ
χ
χ
χV/)
I

Langzeitwirkungen ionisierender Strahlen
Long-term effects ofionizing radiations
Effets along terme desrayonnements ionisants
EULEP (Duplan etal.)
CEN ,Mol (Maisin )
GSF ,Neuherberg (Gossner /Hug)
DKFZ ,Heidelberg (Scheer )
NRPB ,Harwell (Dolphin )
NRPB ,Harwell (Dolphin j
AERE ,Harwell (Chamberlain )
CNEN ,CSNCasaccia (Clemente )
AERE .Harwell (Morgan )
CNEN ,Bologna (Prodi )
Univ .London (Lindop )
PCL ,London (Simmons )
MHC ,Harwell (Vennart )
ENEL ,Borna (Farulla )
Fond .Bergonié ,Bordeaux (Duplan )
CEN ,Mol (Maisin )
Univ .Copenhagen (Danp )
Univ .Copenhagen (Ebbesen )
TNO ,Bijswijk (Broerse /Barendsen )
GSF ,Neuherberg (Kriegel )
CEN ,Mol (Vanderborght )
MRC ,London (Jones )
Univ .Pisa (Donato )
Univ .Erlangen (Pauly )
GSF fNeuherberg (Drexler )
AERE .Harwell (Peirson )
TNO ,Rijswijk (Barendsen /Broerse )
KFA ,Jïilich (Feinendegen )
Univ .Wiirzburg (Kellerer )
Univ .Leiden (van derEb)
Finsen Institute ,Copenhagen (Faber )
Techno .Dublin (Taafe /Malone )
CEA-CEN Fontenay -aux-Boses (Lacourly )I II iom I
α α·Ηα» ι
OOO4->Jh I
•Hm*H (fl3
© «P3T}ΟΌ
4-» O C3«0)C<D I
I Q O Ό •ηοεωυ ι
•Η Ο O •cero 'dft cdo
<o ■Ρ «Μ C (fioo ft axc-HO o «Μ Ο ·ΗΌ •Ρ·Η « Q)<Htftα « 0) •Η5-Ρ·Η ΟΛ
■ ΑΙ iJJ Mmi I IMm L ---. «
■ » I ι w «u■ –– -r ■ - iΤ5 3-Ht,O <HC (0
O © α> •OHo3 «ΗΟ 4>
d 6 •HoftC Ift 0}
I *H (4 •H bJ3 LiO I«P ΟΟ
ι ο 4) .ο •P ldO*H φα .Η 4-> CS
I u Λ 6 03-POTJ (0H T3O
I d -P O •HDO CS Oo (0 (0 Io |° ■o|ûET3hOh «-H *
n^n Xπ r^n
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X X X
X
«• X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
* X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X 'XL- 1

.Abschatzung desStrahlenrisikos
Evaluation ofradiation risks
Evaluation desrisques d'irradiation
CEA ,CENFontenaj -aux-Roses (Lacourly )
ICRP (Sowby )
GSF ,Neuherberg (Gossner /Hug)
DKFZ ,Heidelberg (Scheer )
ENEL ,Roma (Farulla )I o C
1 Ή Ο
I -P -H
I <tf -P (0 i
1 3 cdm o>
1 H -Hx •ri
i <d "ara Ό
>«H Cd -ri 3
I WO*<_h +>
(0
I.
β)
Iri Ο 1
I» •Η
i+>a a α ω
iao ο. οΙοί
1 0)·ΓΙ •Η I ιΗ
ia-p IΗ-Μ ¬Η-Μ οβ <0 aJaJ aJas •Η
IΟ·Η R-H O -ri 6U-a S-t-o fnXS a>
1-H at <o ti <u tí ■o
1>u +>u -P •H
I CIU 1Xu au p<«•H m -h Η·Η WΠΓ χ X
X X
X X X
X X
* X_υ

.-18-
APPENDIX 2
OpinionoftheAdvisoryCommitteeonProgramme
Management-RadiationProtection
HavingregardtotheCouncilDecisionof15March1976adoptinga
researchandtrainingprogrammeonRadiationProtection (OJNoL74
of20March1976,p.32),andinparticularArticle4concerning
amendmentstoit,jtheAdvisoryCommitteeonProgrammeManagement
(ACPM):
1.examinedindetailatitsmeetingon16-18Mayand14November1977
theprogressandexecutionofthework,
2.considersthattheprogrammehasbeencarriedoutsatisfactorily
andinfullagreementwiththeACPM,
3.considersthattheprojectsdefinedinAnnexIoftheprogramme
approvedbytheCouncilshouldbecontinuedandthat,withinthe
limitsoftheavailableresources,theyadequatelycoverthefield
ofresearchnecessaryforanobjectiveevaluationoftheeffects
andhazardsofionizingradiationwithregardtomanandhis
environment,
4.expressesitsunanimousagreementwiththeconclusions ofthis.
report.
DoneatBrussels,14November1977
M.Faber
ChairmanoftheACPM
RadiationProtection