Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)

Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)

–◻ The proposal/initiative requires application of the flexibility instrument or revision of the multiannual financial framework.

–◻ The proposal/initiative will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the multiannual financial framework.

The human resources required will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.

Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)

–☑ The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as explained below:

–◻ The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources.

The appropriations required for human resources and other expenditure of an administrative nature will be met by appropriations from the DG that are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.

Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)

–☑ The proposal/initiative requires the use of appropriations of an administrative nature, as explained below:

–◻ The proposal/initiative does not require the use of appropriations of an administrative nature

Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)

–☑ The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational appropriations, as explained below:

–◻ The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations

Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)

Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)

If more than one heading is affected by the proposal / initiative:

Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)

within the meaning of Article 21(2)(b) of the Financial Regulation

within the meaning of Article 21(2)(b) of the Financial Regulation

As per the provisions of the framework agreement concluded with the organisation concerned. In addition, DG Trade’s anti-fraud strategy, which contains a dedicated chapter on financial management, will apply.

Given the estimated financial impact, no substantive quantifiable costs or benefits can be identified. The contribution will be part of DG Trade’s overall control system.

2.2.3.Estimate of the costs and benefits of the controls and assessment of the expected level of risk of error

As per the provisions of the framework agreement concluded with the organisation concerned. In particular, the applicable verification rules.

As per the provisions of the framework agreement concluded with the organisation concerned.

As per the provisions of the framework agreement concluded with the organisation concerned.

As regards the financial handling of the ICS in the EU-Singapore IPA, a contribution will be given to an “existing structure” (namely, the ICSID) so that it channels the retainer fees to be paid to the judges composing the ICS. It is only in case that a dispute arises that the fees for case management could materialize, the services of ICSID as secretariat being otherwise free of charge.

–If more than one management mode is indicated, please provide details in the ‘Comments’ section.

–◻ persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions in the CFSP pursuant to Title V of the TEU, and identified in the relevant basic act.

–◻ bodies governed by the private law of a Member State that are entrusted with the implementation of a public-private partnership and that provide adequate financial guarantees;

–◻ bodies governed by private law with a public service mission to the extent that they provide adequate financial guarantees;

–◻ bodies referred to in Articles 208 and 209 of the Financial Regulation;

–◻ by its departments, including by its staff in the Union delegations;

–Implementation with a start-up period from 2018 (subject to ratification in the Council and the European Parliament).

As close investment partners, the EU and Singapore will benefit from the enhanced investment climate that the IPA will provide for. The agreement further contains all the innovations of the EU’s new approach to investment protection and its enforcement mechanisms that are not present in the 12 existing bilateral investment treaties between Singapore and EU Member States that the IPA will be replacing.

In 2016, total EU FDI in Singapore amounted to € 168 billion, which constitutes more than one-fifth of the total FDI stock in Singapore, making the EU Singapore’s largest foreign investor. Conversely, Singapore is the EU’s third largest Asian investor and seventh largest external investor, holding investments stocks amounting to about € 88 billion in 2016.

Maintain or improve the level of investment flows between the EU and Singapore.

The IPA brings legal certainty and predictability that is expected to help the EU and Singapore attract and maintain investment to underpin their economy.

The agreement establishes an Investment Court System (ICS) designed to meet the high expectations of citizens and industry for a fairer, more transparent and institutionalised system of settling investment disputes. The provisions in the EU-Singapore IPA having an impact on the EU budget relate precisely to the setting up and running costs of the ICS.

The objective of the EU-Singapore Investment Protection Agreement (IPA) is to enhance the investment climate between the EU and Singapore. The agreement will bring benefits to European investors by ensuring a high level protection of their investments in Singapore, while at the same time safeguarding the EU’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment.

Specify the effects which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted.

The proposal can be framed in the first of the ten Juncker priorities – Jobs, Growth and Investment.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

The President of the Council shall designate the person empowered to proceed, on behalf of the European Union, to send the notification provided for in Article 4.15(2) of the Agreement, in order to express the consent of the European Union to be bound by the Agreement.

The Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore of the other part is hereby concluded.

(3)In accordance with Article 4.11 (No Direct Effect) of the Agreement, it should not confer rights or impose obligations on persons, other than those created between the Parties under public international law,

(1)In accordance with Council Decision No [XX], the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore of the other part (hereinafter “the Agreement”) was signed on [XX XXX 2018].

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) thereof,

on the conclusion of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore of the other part

The Commission is mindful of the balance to be struck between moving forward with the reformed EU investment policy and the sensitivities of the Member States as regards the possible exercise of shared competence on these matters. The Commission has not, therefore made a proposal to provisionally apply the investment protection agreement. Nonetheless, should Member States wish to see a proposal for provisional application of the investment protection agreement, the Commission stands ready to make such a proposal.

Also in line with the negotiating directives, the IPA negotiated by the Commission will offer investors the option of a modern and reformed investment dispute resolution mechanism. This system ensures that investment protection rules are adhered to and seeks to strike a balance between protecting investors in a transparent manner and safeguarding the right of a State to regulate in order to pursue public policy objectives. The agreement sets up a standing international and fully independent dispute resolution system, consisting of permanent First Instance and Appeal Tribunals that will conduct dispute settlement proceedings in a transparent and impartial manner.

In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission ensured that EU investors and their investments in Singapore will be granted fair and equitable treatment and not be discriminated against compared to Singaporean investments that are in like situations. At the same time, the IPA protects EU investors and their investments in Singapore from expropriation, unless it is for public purposes, in accordance with due process, on a non-discriminatory basis and against payment of prompt, adequate, and effective compensation according to fair market value of the expropriated investment.

The agreement contains all the innovations of the EU’s new approach to investment protection and its enforcement mechanisms that are not present in the 12 existing bilateral investment treaties between Singapore and EU Member States. It is a very important feature of the IPA that it replaces and hence improves the 12 existing bilateral investment treaties.

The EU-Singapore IPA will ensure a high level of investment protection, while safeguarding the EU’s and Singapore’s rights to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives such as the protection of public health, safety and the environment.

(10)a comprehensive and novel chapter to promote new opportunities in the “green growth sector”, in line with the EUs 2020 strategy.

(9)a swift dispute resolution mechanisms through either panel arbitration or with the help of a mediator; and

(8)a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how social partners and civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring;

(7)a TRIPs-plus level of protection to EU GIs following their registration in Singapore once Singapore has established a GI register (which it has committed to do following the European Parliament’s consent to the FTA);

(6)a high level protection of intellectual property rights, including with regard to the enforcement of these rights, including at the border;

(5)Singapore’s commitment not to raise its tariffs (which are currently mostly not applied on a voluntary basis) on imports from the EU, as well as cheaper access of European businesses and consumers to products made in Singapore;

(4)based on international standards, a more trade-facilitative regime for the approval of European meat exports to Singapore;

(3)the removal of technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade in goods, such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards familiar in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies;

(2)new tendering opportunities for EU bidders, and especially in the utilities market where there are many leading EU suppliers;

(1)the comprehensive liberalisation of services and investment markets, including cross-cutting rules on licensing and for the mutual recognition of diplomas, and sector-specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses;

In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission secured:

The agreement satisfies the criteria of Article XXIV GATT (to eliminate duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce with respect to substantially all trade in goods between the parties) as well as of Article V GATS, which provides for a similar test with respect to services.

Both of these objectives have been fully met: the agreement goes beyond existing WTO commitments in many areas, such as services, procurement, non-tariff barriers and the protection of intellectual property including geographical indications (GI). In all of these areas Singapore also agreed to new commitments which go significantly above what Singapore has so far been willing to accept, including in its FTA with the United States.

In negotiating this agreement, the Commission pursued two principal objectives: first, to provide the best possible terms of access for EU operators to Singapore’s market; and, second, to set a valuable point of reference for the EU’s other negotiations in the region.

The EU-Singapore FTA establishes the conditions for EU economic operators to take full advantage of the opportunities created in Singapore as the business and transport hub of Southeast Asia.

As emphasised in the “Trade for All” Communication, the Commission is dedicating increasing resources to the effective implementation and enforcement of trade and investment agreements. In 2017, the Commission published the first annual FTA Implementation Report. The main purpose of the report is to convey an objective picture on the implementation of EU FTAs, highlighting the progress made and the shortcomings that need to be addressed. The objective is for the report to serve as the basis for open debate and engagement with Member States, the European Parliament and the civil society at large on the functioning of the FTAs and their implementation. As an annual exercise, the publication of the report will allow regular monitoring of developments, registering also how identified priority issues have been addressed. The report will cover the EU-Singapore FTA as of its entry into force.

The institutional chapter of the IPA establishes a Committee with the main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the agreement. Among other tasks, the Committee may, subject to the completion of each side’s respective legal requirements and procedures, decide to appoint the Members of the ICS Tribunals, fix their monthly retainer and fees, and adopt binding interpretations of the agreement.

The Trade Committee has also the task to communicate with all interested parties, including private sector and civil society, in relation to the functioning and implementation of the agreement. In the agreement, both sides recognise the importance of transparency and openness and commit to consider the views of members of the public in order to draw on a broad range of perspectives in the implementation of the agreement.

The institutional chapter of the FTA establishes a Trade Committee that has as its main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the agreement. The Trade Committee is comprised of representatives of the EU and of Singapore who will meet every two years or at the request of either side. The Trade Committee will be in charge of supervising the work of all specialised committees established under the agreement (Committee on Trade in Goods; Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures; Committee on Customs; and Committee on Trade in Services, Investment and Government Procurement).

The EU-Singapore FTA and IPA include institutional provisions that lay down an implementing bodies’ structure to continuously monitor the implementation, operation and impact of the agreements. The agreements being an integral part of the overall bilateral relation between the EU and Singapore as governed by the PCA, the mentioned structures will form part of a common institutional framework with the PCA.

The EU-Singapore IPA is expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures. The agreement will be the EU’s second (after the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) to incorporate the Investment Court System (ICS) for the resolution of disputes between investors and states. An amount of € 200,000 of additional yearly expenditure is foreseen from 2018 onwards (subject to the entry into force of the agreement) to finance the permanent structure comprising a First Instance and an Appeal Tribunal. At the same time, the agreement entails the use of administrative resources under budget line XX 01 01 01 (Expenditure related to officials and temporary staff working with the Institution), considering that it is estimated that one Administrator will be dedicated as full-time equivalent to the tasks inherent to this agreement. This is indicated in the Legislative Financial Statement and is subject to the conditions mentioned in it.

The EU-Singapore FTA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues. It is estimated that foregone duties could reach an amount of € 248.8 million upon full implementation of the agreement. The estimate is based on average imports projected for 2025 in the absence of an agreement and represents the annual loss in revenues resulting from the elimination of EU tariffs on imports from Singapore.

The proposal does not affect the protection of fundamental rights in the Union.

The EU-Singapore FTA and IPA are not subject to REFIT procedures. They nevertheless contain a number of provisions that will simplify trade and investment procedures, reduce export and investment related costs and will therefore enable more small firms to do business in both markets. Among the expected benefits are: less burdensome technical rules, compliance requirements, customs procedures and rules of origin, the protection of intellectual property rights, or the reduction in cost of litigation under the Investment Court System for claimants that are SMEs.

The TSIA, conducted by an external contractor and finalised in 2009, concluded that an ambitious EU-ASEAN FTA would deliver important positive impacts (in terms of GDP, income, trade and employment) for both the EU and Singapore. National income effects on the EU side were estimated at € 13 billion and for Singapore at € 7.5 billion. These figures could underestimate the impact, as they were based on trade patterns in 2007, and trade has grown substantially since (+32%).

A Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment of the FTA between the EU and ASEAN was carried out by the external contractor “Ecorys”.

Also, prior and during negotiations, the EU Member States were regularly informed and consulted orally and in writing on the different aspects of the negotiation via the Council’s Trade Policy Committee. The European Parliament was also regularly informed and consulted via its Committee on International Trade (INTA), and notably its EU-Singapore FTA Monitoring Group. The texts progressively resulting from the negotiations were circulated throughout the process to both institutions.

In addition, prior to the launch of bilateral negotiations with Singapore, the Commission conducted a public consultation on the future agreement that included a questionnaire prepared to obtain information from stakeholders that later helped the Commission in establishing priorities and taking decisions throughout the negotiating process. A summary of the results of the consultation was made public.

Both, the TSIA report and the consultations held in the context of its preparation, provided the Commission with input that has been of great value in all bilateral trade and investment negotiations launched since with individual ASEAN Member States.

In the framework of the preparation of the TSIA, the contractor consulted internal and external experts, organised public consultations in Brussels and in Bangkok, and held bilateral meetings and interviews with civil society in the EU and in ASEAN. Consultations in the framework of the TSIA provided a platform for the involvement of key stakeholders and the civil society in a dialogue on trade policy in relation to Southeast Asia.

Prior to the launch of bilateral negotiations with Singapore, a Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment (TSIA) of the FTA between the EU and the ASEAN was conducted by an external contractor to study the potential economic, social and environmental impact of a closer economic partnership between both regions.

Moreover, estimates based on economic modelling cannot account for the strategic value of the EU-Singapore FTA and IPA for the EU as crucial agreements for the EU’s wider agenda in the ASEAN region, and in Asia as a whole. Following the EU-Korea FTA, the EU-Singapore FTA will be the EU’s second high calibre trade agreement with a key Asian partner, while the EU-Singapore IPA will be in its turn the first investment protection agreement the EU enters into with an Asian partner.

In view of Singapore’s role as the hub for trade in goods and services between Europe and Southeast Asia, it is also likely that the gains from the agreement would grow further if and when the EU concludes agreements with other ASEAN Member States.

These estimates on the possible economic impact are deemed conservative given the difficulty to precisely quantify the effects of the removal of non-tariff barriers, which is a key component of the agreement.

Given the large difference in size of the two economies, as well as the relative openness of Singapore’s economy, it is inevitable that the benefits of the agreement for the partners differ. The analysis predicts that EU real GDP could grow by around € 550 million over a 10-year period, whilst Singapore’s economy could grow by € 2.7 billion over the same period.

After negotiations with Singapore were for its most part completed, an in-house team led by DG Trade’s Chief Economist carried out a study of the economic benefits to be expected from the agreement. The analysis predicts that EU exports to Singapore could rise by some € 1.4 billion over a 10-year period, while Singapore’s exports to the EU could grow by € 3.5 billion – a figure which includes shipments from the many EU subsidiaries in Singapore back to the EU.

This proposal is in accordance with Article 218 TFEU, which envisages the adoption by the Council of decisions on international agreements. There exists no other legal instrument that could be used in order to achieve the objective expressed in this proposal.

This proposal is in line with the vision of the Europe 2020 strategy and contributes to the EUs trade and development objectives.

With regard to the IPA, the Court confirmed that, pursuant to Article 207 TFEU, the EU has exclusive competence with regard to all substantive provisions on investment protection, to the extent that these apply to foreign direct investment. The Court further confirmed the EUs exclusive competence with regard to the state-to-state dispute settlement mechanism in relation to investment protection. Finally, the Court stated that the EU has shared competence with regard to non-direct investment and investor-to-state dispute settlement (replaced later on by the Investment Court System in the IPA), where the Member States act as defendants. These elements cannot be separated in any coherent way from the substantive provisions or the state-to-state dispute settlement and hence should be included in EU-level agreements.

As confirmed by Opinion 2/15, the EU-Singapore FTA as presented to Council does not cover any matters that fall outside of the EU’s exclusive competence.

The EU-Singapore IPA is to be signed by the Union pursuant to a decision of the Council based on Article 218(5) TFEU and concluded by the Union pursuant to a decision of the Council based on Article 218(6) TFEU, following the European Parliament’s consent and ratification by the Member States in accordance with their respective internal procedures.

The EU-Singapore FTA is to be signed by the Union pursuant to a decision of the Council based on Article 218(5) TFEU and concluded by the Union pursuant to a decision of the Council based on Article 218(6) TFEU, following the European Parliament’s consent.

According to the Opinion 2/15, all the areas covered by the EU-Singapore FTA fall within the competence of the EU and, more particularly, within the scope of Articles 91, 100(2) and 207 TFEU. All substantive provisions on investment protection under the IPA, to the extent that these apply to foreign direct investment, are covered under Article 207 TFEU.

In view of the Court Opinion, and in light of the wide-ranging discussions on the architecture with the Council and the European Parliament following the Opinion, the initially negotiated text has been adjusted to create two self-standing agreements: an FTA and an IPA.

In its Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017, the Court confirmed the EU’s exclusive competence with regard to all matters covered by the agreement that had been negotiated with Singapore, except for non-direct investment and investor-to-state dispute settlement where the Member States are defendants that the Court considered to be of shared competence of the EU and the Member States. The text on investor-to-state dispute settlement was subsequently replaced by the Investment Court System in the IPA. The Court drew the EU exclusive competence from the scope of the Common Commercial Policy under Article 207(1) TFEU and from Article 3(2) TFEU (based on the affectation of existing common rules contained in secondary legislation).

In July 2015, the Commission seized the Court of Justice of the EU for an Opinion under Article 218(11) TFEU on whether the Union had the necessary competence to sign and conclude alone the agreement that had been negotiated with Singapore, or whether the participation of the EU Member States would be necessary, or at least possible, in respect of certain matters.

Furthermore, like all other trade and investment agreements the Commission has negotiated, the EU-Singapore FTA and IPA fully safeguard public services and ensure that governments’ right to regulate in the public interest is fully preserved by the agreements and constitutes a basic underlying principle to them.

The EU-Singapore FTA and IPA are fully consistent with Union policies and will not require the EU to amend its rules, regulations or standards in any regulated area (e.g. technical rules and product standards, sanitary or phytosanitary rules, regulations on food and safety, health and safety standards, rules on GMO’s, environmental protection, consumer protection, etc.).

From the date of its entry into force, the EU-Singapore IPA will replace and supersede the bilateral investment treaties between the Republic of Singapore and EU Member States that are listed in Annex 5 (Agreements Referred to in Article 4.12) to the IPA.

The EU and Singapore’s longstanding trade and economic relationship has until now developed in the absence of a specific legal framework. The FTA and IPA that have been negotiated will constitute specific agreements giving effect to the trade and investment provisions of the PCA and will be an integral part of the overall bilateral relations between the EU and Singapore.

The negotiation of the FTA and the IPA was accompanied by the negotiation in parallel, by the European External Action Service, of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Singapore, which was initialled in October 2013. Once in force, the PCA will provide the legal framework to further develop the already longstanding and strong partnership between the EU and Singapore, in a broad range of areas, including political dialogue, trade, energy, transport, human rights, education, science and technology, justice asylum and migration.

The attached proposal for a Council Decision constitutes the legal instrument for the conclusion of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore of the other part.

In parallel to these proposals, the Commission will put forward a proposal for a horizontal safeguard regulation that will cover the EU-Singapore FTA among other agreements.

–Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore of the other part.

–Proposal for a Council Decision on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore of the other part;

–Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore;

–Proposal for a Council Decision on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore;

On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2007, and supplemented in 2011 to include investment protection, the Commission has negotiated with the Republic of Singapore an ambitious and comprehensive FTA and an Investment Protection Agreement (IPA), with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners to develop. The legally reviewed texts of the agreements have been made public and can be found on the following link:

On 12 September 2011 the Council authorised the Commission to extend the on-going negotiations with Singapore to cover also investment protection, based on a new EU competence under the Lisbon Treaty.

On 22 December 2009, the Council agreed on the principle of launching bilateral negotiations with individual ASEAN Member States, based on the authorisation and negotiating directives of 2007, whilst preserving the strategic objective of a region-to-region agreement. The Council also authorised the Commission to start bilateral negotiations on a free trade agreement with Singapore, which would serve as a first step towards the objective of the timely launch of such negotiations with other relevant ASEAN Member States. Bilateral negotiations with Singapore commenced in March 2010 and the EU has since opened bilateral FTA negotiations with other ASEAN Member States: Malaysia (2010), Vietnam (2012), Thailand (2013), the Philippines (2015) and Indonesia (2016).

On 23 April 2007, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a region-to-region Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Member States of the ASEAN. It being understood that the objective was to negotiate a region-to-region FTA, the authorisation provided however for the possibility of bilateral negotiations in the event that it was not possible to reach an agreement to negotiate jointly with a grouping of Member States of the ASEAN. In light of difficulties encountered in the region-to-region negotiations, both sides acknowledged that an impasse had been reached and agreed to pause these.

Within the ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest partner, accounting for slightly under one-third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services, and roughly two-thirds of investments between the two regions. Over 10,000 EU companies are established in Singapore and use it as a hub to serve the whole Pacific Rim.

The dynamically growing Southeast Asian economies, with their over 600 million consumers and a rapidly rising middle class, are key markets for European Union exporters and investors. With a total € 208 billion of trade in goods and € 77 billion of trade in services (2016), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) taken as a whole is the EU’s third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China. At the same time, a total € 263 billion foreign direct investment stock (2016) in the ASEAN makes the EU the first foreign direct investor in the ASEAN, while the ASEAN as a whole is in its turn the second largest Asian foreign direct investor in the EU – with a total foreign direct investment stock of € 116 billion (2016).

on the conclusion of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore of the other part

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.4.2018 COM(2018) 194 final ANNEX

to the Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part





INVESTMENT PROTECTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES, OF THE ONE PART, AND THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE, OF THE OTHER PART THE EUROPEAN UNION (hereinafter referred to as the "Union"), THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, IRELAND,

THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS,



THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBURG,

HUNGARY, THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA, THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA, THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC, ROMANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA, THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND,





THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN, and THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, of the one part, and THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE (hereinafter referred to as "Singapore"), of the other part, hereinafter jointly referred to as "the Parties", RECOGNISING their longstanding and strong partnership based on the common principles and values reflected in the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part (hereinafter referred to as "EUSPCA"), and their important economic, trade and investment relationship including as reflected in the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore (hereinafter referred to as "EUSFTA"); DESIRING to further strengthen their relationship as part of and in a manner coherent with their overall relations, and convinced that this Agreement will create a new climate for further development of investment between the Parties; RECOGNISING that this Agreement will complement and promote regional economic integration efforts;





DETERMINED to strengthen their economic, trade, and investment relations in accordance with the objective of sustainable development, in its economic, social and environmental dimensions, and to promote investment in a manner mindful of high levels of environmental and labour protection and relevant internationally-recognised standards and agreements to which they are parties; REAFFIRMING their commitment to the principles of sustainable development and transparency as reflected in the EUSFTA; REAFFIRMING each Party's right to adopt and enforce measures necessary to pursue legitimate policy objectives such as social, environmental, security, public health and safety, promotion and protection of cultural diversity; REAFFIRMING their commitment to the Charter of the United Nations signed in San Francisco on 26 June 1945 and having regard to the principles articulated in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10 December 1948; RECOGNISING the importance of transparency in international trade and investment to the benefit of all stakeholders; BUILDING on their respective rights and obligations under the WTO Agreement and other multilateral, regional and bilateral agreements and arrangements to which they are party, in particular, the EUSFTA, HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:



CHAPTER ONE OBJECTIVE AND GENERAL DEFINITIONS

ARTICLE 1.1 Objective The objective of this Agreement is to enhance the investment climate between the Parties in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. ARTICLE 1.2 Definitions For the purposes of this Agreement: 1. "covered investment" means an investment which is owned, directly or indirectly, or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a covered investor of one Party in the territory of the other Party.



"investment" means every kind of asset which has the characteristics of an investment, including such characteristics as the commitment of capital or other resources, the expectation of gain or profit, the assumption of risk or a certain duration. Forms that an investment may take include: (a) tangible or intangible, movable or immovable property as well as any other property rights, such as leases, mortgages, liens, and pledges;

(b) an enterprise including a branch, shares, stocks and other forms of equity participation in an enterprise, including rights derived therefrom; (c) bonds, debentures, and loans and other debt instruments, including rights derived therefrom; (d) other financial assets, including derivatives, futures and options; (e) turnkey, construction, management, production, concession, revenue-sharing, and other similar contracts; (f) claims to money or to other assets, or to any contractual performance having an economic value;



(g) intellectual property rights and goodwill; and (h) licenses, authorisations, permits, and similar rights conferred pursuant to domestic law, including any concessions to search for, cultivate, extract or exploit natural resources. Returns that are invested shall be treated as investments and any alteration of the form in which assets are invested or reinvested shall not affect their qualification as investments. 2. "covered investor" means a natural person or a juridical person of one Party that has made an investment in the territory of the other Party.





3. "natural person of a Party" means a national of Singapore, or of one of the Member States of the Union, according to their respective legislation. 4. "juridical person" means any legal entity duly constituted or otherwise organised under applicable law, whether or not for profit and whether privately-owned or governmentallyowned, including any corporation, trust, partnership, joint venture, sole proprietorship or association. 5. "Union juridical person" or "Singapore juridical person" means a juridical person set up in accordance with the law of the Union or a Member State of the Union or Singapore, respectively, and having its registered office, central administration or principal place of business in the territory of the Union or Singapore, respectively. Should the juridical person have only its registered office or central administration in the territory of the Union or of Singapore, respectively, it shall not be considered as a Union juridical person or a Singapore juridical person, respectively, unless it engages in substantive business operations in the territory of the Union or of Singapore, respectively.



6. "measure" means any law, regulation, procedure, requirement or practice. 7. "treatment" or "measure" adopted or maintained by a Party includes those taken by: (a) central, regional or local governments and authorities; and (b) non-governmental bodies in the exercise of powers delegated by central, regional or local governments or authorities. 8. "returns" means all amounts yielded by or derived from an investment or reinvestment, including profits, dividends, capital gains, royalties, interests, payments in connection with intellectual property rights, payments in kind and all other lawful income. 9. "freely convertible currency" means a currency which is widely traded in international foreign exchange markets and widely used in international transactions.

10. "establishment" means: (a) the constitution, acquisition or maintenance of a juridical person; or (b) the creation or maintenance of a branch or representative office, with a view to establishing or maintaining lasting economic links within the territory of a Party for the purpose of performing an economic activity.



11. "economic activity" includes any activities of an economic nature except activities carried out in the exercise of governmental authority, i.e., activities not carried out on a commercial basis or in competition with one or more economic operators. 12. "EU Party" means the Union or its Member States, or the Union and its Member States, within their respective areas of competence as derived from the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. CHAPTER TWO INVESTMENT PROTECTION ARTICLE 2.1

Scope 1. This Chapter shall apply to covered investors and covered investments made in accordance with the applicable law, whether such investments were made before or after the entry into force of this Agreement. 2. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, Article 2.3 (National Treatment) shall not apply to subsidies or grants provided by a Party, including government-supported loans, guarantees and insurance.



3. Article 2.3 (National Treatment) shall not apply to: (a) the procurement by governmental agencies of goods and services purchased for governmental purposes and not with a view to commercial resale or with a view to use in the supply of goods or the supply of services for commercial sale; or (b) audio-visual services; (c) activities performed in the exercise of governmental authority within the respective territories of the Parties. For the purposes of this Agreement, an activity performed in the exercise of governmental authority means any activity, except an activity which is supplied on a commercial basis or in competition with one or more suppliers. ARTICLE 2.2 Investment and Regulatory Measures

1. The Parties reaffirm their right to regulate within their territories to achieve legitimate policy objectives, such as the protection of public health, social services, public education, safety, environment or public morals, social or consumer protection privacy and data protection and the promotion and protection of cultural diversity.



2. For greater certainty, the mere fact that a Party regulates, including through a modification to its laws, in a manner which negatively affects an investment or interferes with an investor's expectations, including its expectations of profits, does not amount to a breach of an obligation under this Chapter. 3. For greater certainty, a Party's decision not to issue, renew or maintain a subsidy or grant: (a) in the absence of any specific commitment under domestic law or contract to issue, renew, or maintain that subsidy or grant; or (b) if the decision is made in accordance with the terms or conditions attached to the issuance, renewal or maintenance of the subsidy or grant, if any, does not constitute a breach of the provisions of this Chapter. 4. For greater certainty, nothing in this Chapter shall be construed as preventing a Party from discontinuing the granting of a subsidy or requesting its reimbursement where such action has been ordered by a competent court, administrative tribunal or other competent authority, or requiring that Party to compensate the investor therefor.



ARTICLE 2.3

National Treatment 1. Each Party shall accord to covered investors of the other Party and to their covered investments, treatment in its territory no less favourable than the treatment it accords, in like situations, to its own investors and their investments with respect to the operation, management, conduct, maintenance, use, enjoyment and sale or other disposal of their investments. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, each Party may adopt or maintain any measure with respect to the operation, management, conduct, maintenance, use, enjoyment and sale or other disposal of an establishment that is not inconsistent with commitments inscribed in its Schedule of Specific Commitments in Annex 8-A and 8-B of Chapter 8 (Services, Establishment and Electronic Commerce) of the EUSFTA respectively, where such measure is: (a) a measure that is adopted on or before the entry into force of this Agreement;



(b) a measure referred to in subparagraph (a) that is being continued, replaced or amended after the entry into force of this Agreement, provided the measure is no less consistent with paragraph 1 after being continued, replaced or amended than the measure as it existed prior to its continuation, replacement or amendment; or (c) a measure not falling within subparagraphs (a) or (b), provided it is not applied in respect of, or in a way that causes loss or damage to, covered investments made in the territory of the Party before the entry into force of such measure. 3. Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, a Party may adopt or enforce measures that accord to covered investors and investments of the other Party less favourable treatment than that accorded to its own investors and their investments, in like situations, subject to the requirement that such measures are not applied in a manner which would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination against the covered investors or investments of the other Party in the territory of a Party, or is a disguised restriction on covered investments, where the measures are:



(a) necessary to protect public security, public morals or to maintain public order; (b) necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or health;

(c) relating to the conservation of exhaustible natural resources if such measures are applied in conjunction with restrictions on domestic investors or investments; (d) necessary for the protection of national treasures of artistic, historic or archaeological value; (e) necessary to secure compliance with laws or regulations which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Chapter including those relating to: (i) the prevention of deceptive or fraudulent practices or to deal with the effects of a default on a contract; (ii) the protection of the privacy of individuals in relation to the processing and dissemination of personal data and the protection of confidential of individual records and accounts; (iii) safety;



(f) aimed at ensuring the effective or equitable imposition or collection of direct taxes in respect of investors or investments of the other Party.



ARTICLE 2.4 Standard of Treatment

1. Each Party shall accord in its territory to covered investments of the other Party fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 6. 2. A Party breaches the obligation of fair and equitable treatment referenced in paragraph 1 if its measure or series of measures constitute: (a) denial of justice in criminal, civil and administrative proceedings; (b) a fundamental breach of due process; (c) manifestly arbitrary conduct; (d) harassment, coercion, abuse of power or similar bad faith conduct.



3. In determining whether the fair and equitable treatment obligation, as set out in paragraph 2, has been breached, a Tribunal may take into account, where applicable, whether a Party made specific or unambiguous representations to an investor so as to induce the investment, that created legitimate expectations of a covered investor and which were reasonably relied upon by the covered investor, but that the Party subsequently frustrated. 4. The Parties shall, upon request of a Party or recommendations by the Committee, review the content of the obligation to provide fair and equitable treatment, pursuant to the procedure for amendments set out in Article 4.3 (Amendments), in particular, whether treatment other than those listed in paragraph 2 can also constitute a breach of fair and equitable treatment. 5. For greater certainty, "full protection and security" only refers to a Party's obligation relating to physical security of covered investors and investments.





6. Where a Party, itself or through any entity mentioned in paragraph 7 of Article 1.2 (Definitions), had given a specific and clearly spelt out commitment in a contractual written obligation towards a covered investor of the other Party with respect to the covered investor's investment or towards such covered investment, that Party shall not frustrate or undermine the said commitment through the exercise of its governmental authority either: (a) deliberately; or (b) in a way which substantially alters the balance of rights and obligation in the contractual written obligation unless the Party provides reasonable compensation to restore the covered investor or investment to a position which it would have been in had the frustration or undermining not occurred. 7. A breach of another provision of this Agreement, or of a separate international agreement, does not establish that there has been a breach of this Article.



ARTICLE 2.5 Compensation for Losses 1. Covered investors of one Party whose covered investments suffer losses owing to war or other armed conflict, revolution, a state of national emergency, revolt, insurrection or riot in the territory of the other Party shall be accorded by that Party, as regards restitution, indemnification, compensation or other settlement, treatment no less favourable than that accorded by that Party to its own investors or to the investors of any third country, whichever is more favourable to the covered investor concerned. 2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, covered investors of a Party who, in any of the situations referred to in paragraph 1, suffer losses in the territory of the other Party resulting from: (a) requisitioning of its covered investment or a part thereof by the other Party's armed forces or authorities; or

(b) destruction of its covered investment or a part thereof by the other Party's armed forces or authorities, which was not required by the necessity of the situation, shall be accorded by the other Party restitution or compensation.



ARTICLE 2.6 Expropriation 1. Neither Party shall directly or indirectly nationalise, expropriate or subject to measures having effect equivalent to nationalisation or expropriation (hereinafter referred to as "expropriation") the covered investments of covered investors of the other Party except: (a) for a public purpose; (b) in accordance with due process of law; (c) on a non-discriminatory basis; and (d) against payment of prompt, adequate and effective compensation in accordance with paragraph 2.

2. Compensation shall amount to the fair market value of the covered investment immediately before its expropriation or impending expropriation became public knowledge plus interest at a commercially reasonable rate, established on a market basis taking into account the length of time from the time of expropriation until the time of payment. Such compensation shall be effectively realisable, freely transferable in accordance with Article 2.7 (Transfer) and made without delay.



Valuation criteria used to determine fair market value may include going concern value, asset value including the declared tax value of tangible property, and other criteria, as appropriate. 3. This Article does not apply to the issuance of compulsory licences granted in relation to intellectual property rights, to the extent that such issuance is consistent with the TRIPS Agreement. 4. Any measure of expropriation or valuation shall, at the request of the covered investors affected, be reviewed by a judicial or other independent authority of the Party taking the measure. ARTICLE 2.7 Transfer 1. Each Party shall permit all transfers relating to a covered investment to be made in a freely convertible currency without restriction or delay. Such transfers include: (a) contributions to capital such as principal and additional funds to maintain, develop or increase the covered investment; (b) profits, dividends, capital gains and other returns, proceeds from the sale of all or any part of the covered investment or from the partial or complete liquidation of the covered investment;

(c) interest, royalty payments, management fees, and technical assistance and other fees;



(d) payments made under a contract entered into by the covered investor, or its covered investment, including payments made pursuant to a loan agreement; (e) earnings and other remuneration of personnel engaged from abroad and working in connection with a covered investment; (f) payments made pursuant to Article 2.6 (Expropriation) and Article 2.5 (Compensation for Losses); (g) payments arising under Article 3.18 (Award). 2. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to prevent a Party from applying in an equitable and non-discriminatory manner its law relating to: (a) bankruptcy, insolvency, or the protection of the rights of creditors; (b) issuing, trading, or dealing in securities, futures, options, or derivatives; (c) financial reporting or record keeping of transfers when necessary to assist law enforcement or financial regulatory authorities;

(d) criminal or penal offences; (e) ensuring compliance with orders or judgments in judicial or administrative proceedings;



(f) social security, public retirement or compulsory savings schemes; or (g) taxation. 3. When in exceptional circumstances of serious difficulties, or threat thereof, for the operation of the economic and monetary policy or exchange rate policy in either Party, safeguard measures with regard to transfers may temporarily be taken by the Party concerned. Such measures shall be strictly necessary, shall not exceed in any case a period of six months, and shall not constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustified discrimination between a Party and a non-Party in like situations. The Party adopting the safeguard measures shall inform the other Party forthwith and present, as soon as possible, a time schedule for their removal. 4. Where a Party is in serious balance-of-payments and external financial difficulties, or under threat thereof, it may adopt or maintain restrictive measures with regard to transfers related to investments.



5. The Parties shall endeavour to avoid the application of the restrictive measures referred to in paragraph 4. Any restrictive measures adopted or maintained under paragraph 4 shall be nondiscriminatory, of a limited duration, and not go beyond what is necessary to remedy the balanceofpayments and external financial situation. They shall be in accordance with the conditions established in the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization done at Marrakesh on 15 April 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "WTO Agreement") and consistent with the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, as applicable. 6. Any Party maintaining or having adopted restrictive measures under paragraph 4, or any changes thereto, shall promptly notify the other Party of them.

7. Where restrictions are adopted or maintained under paragraph 4, consultations shall be held promptly in the Committee. Such consultations shall assess the balanceofpayments situation of the Party concerned and the restrictions adopted or maintained under paragraph 4, taking into account, inter alia, such factors as: (a) the nature and extent of the balance-of-payments and the external financial difficulties; (b) the external economic and trading environment; or (c) alternative corrective measures which may be available.



The consultations shall address the compliance of any restrictive measures with paragraphs 4 and 5. All findings of statistical and other facts presented by the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as "IMF") relating to foreign exchange, monetary reserves and balanceofpayments shall be accepted and conclusions shall be based on the assessment by the IMF of the balanceofpayments and the external financial situation of the Party concerned. ARTICLE 2.8 Subrogation If a Party, or an agency acting on behalf of the Party, makes a payment in favour of any of its investors under a guarantee, a contract of insurance or other form of indemnity it has entered into or granted in respect of an investment, the other Party shall recognise the subrogation or transfer of any right or title or the assignment of any claim in respect of such investment. The Party or the agency shall have the right to exercise the subrogated or assigned right or claim to the same extent as the original right or claim of the investor. Such subrogated rights may be exercised by the Party or an agency or by the investor if the Party or the agency so authorises.





CHAPTER THREE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SECTION A RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES BETWEEN INVESTORS AND PARTIES ARTICLE 3.1 Scope and Definitions 1. This Section shall apply to a dispute between a claimant of one Party and the other Party concerning treatment alleged to breach the provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection) which breach allegedly causes loss or damage to the claimant or its locally established company. 2. For the purposes of this Section, unless otherwise specified: (a) "disputing parties" means the claimant and the respondent;





(b) "claimant" means an investor of a Party which seeks to submit or has submitted a claim pursuant to this Section, either: (i) acting on its own behalf; or (ii) acting on behalf of a locally established company, as defined in subparagraph (c), which it owns or controls; (c) "locally established company" means a juridical person owned or controlled by an investor of one Party, established in the territory of the other Party; (d) "non-disputing Party" means either Singapore, in the case where the Union or a Member State of the Union is the respondent; or the Union, in the case where Singapore is the respondent; (e) "respondent" means either Singapore; or in the case of the EU Party, either the Union or the Member State of the Union as notified pursuant to Article 3.5 (Notice of Intent); and



(f) "third party funding" means any funding provided by a natural or juridical person who is not a party to the dispute but who enters into an agreement with a disputing party in order to finance part or all of the cost of the proceedings in return for a share or other interest in the proceeds or potential proceeds of the proceedings to which the disputing party may become entitled, or in the form of a donation or grant. ARTICLE 3.2 Amicable Resolution

Any dispute should as far as possible be resolved amicably through negotiations and, where possible, before the submission of a request for consultations pursuant to Article 3.3 (Consultations). An amicable resolution may be agreed at any time, including after dispute settlement proceedings under this Section have been commenced. ARTICLE 3.3 Consultations 1. Where a dispute cannot be resolved as provided for under Article 3.2 (Amicable Resolution), a claimant of a Party alleging a breach of the provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection) may submit a request for consultations to the other Party.



2. The request for consultations shall contain the following information: (a) the name and address of the claimant and, where such request is submitted on behalf of a locally established company, the name, address, and place of incorporation of the locally established company; (b) the provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection) alleged to have been breached; (c) the legal and factual basis for the dispute, including the treatment alleged to breach the provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection); and (d) the relief sought and the estimated loss or damage allegedly caused to the claimant or its locally established company by reason of that breach.

3. The request for consultations shall be submitted: (a) within 30 months of the date on which the claimant or, as applicable, the locally established company, first acquired, or should have first acquired, knowledge of the treatment alleged to breach the provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection); or



(b) in the event that local remedies are being pursued when the time period referred to in subparagraph (a) elapses, within one year of the date on which the claimant or, as applicable, the locally established company, ceases to pursue those local remedies; and, in any event, no later than 10 years after the date on which the claimant or, as applicable, its locally established company, first acquired, or should have first acquired, knowledge of the treatment alleged to breach the provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection). 4. In the event that the claimant has not submitted a claim pursuant to Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal) within eighteen months of submitting the request for consultations, the claimant shall be deemed to have withdrawn its request for consultations, any notice of intent and to have waived its rights to bring such a claim. This period may be extended by agreement between the parties involved in the consultations. 5. The time periods referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 shall not render a claim inadmissible where the claimant can demonstrate that the failure to request consultations or submit a claim, as the case may be, is due to the claimant's inability to act as a result of actions deliberately taken by the other Party, provided that the claimant acts as soon as it is reasonably able to act. 6. In the event that the request for consultations concerns an alleged breach of this Agreement by the Union, or by any Member State of the Union, it shall be sent to the Union. 7. The disputing parties may hold the consultations through videoconference or other means where appropriate, such as in the case where the investor is a small or medium-sized enterprise.



ARTICLE 3.4

Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution 1. The disputing parties may at any time, including prior to the delivery of a notice of intent, agree to have recourse to mediation. 2. Recourse to mediation is voluntary and without prejudice to the legal position of either disputing party. 3. Recourse to mediation may be governed by the rules set out in Annex 6 (Mediation Mechanism for Disputes between Investors and Parties) or such other rules as the disputing parties may agree. Any time limit mentioned in Annex 6 (Mediation Mechanism for Disputes between Investors and Parties) may be modified by mutual agreement between the disputing parties. 4. The mediator shall be appointed by agreement of the disputing parties or in accordance with Article 3 (Selection of the Mediator) of Annex 6 (Mediation Mechanism for Disputes between Investors and Parties). Mediators shall comply with Annex 7 (Code of Conduct for Members of the Tribunal, the Appeal Tribunal and Mediators). 5. The disputing parties shall endeavour to reach a mutually agreed solution within sixty days from the appointment of the mediator.



6. Once the disputing parties agree to have recourse to mediation, paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 3.3 (Consultations) shall not apply between the date on which it was agreed to have recourse to mediation, and thirty days after the date on which either party to the dispute decides to put an end to the mediation, by way of a letter to the mediator and the other disputing party. 7. Nothing in this Article shall preclude the disputing parties from having recourse to other forms of alternative dispute resolution. ARTICLE 3.5

Notice of Intent 1. If the dispute cannot be settled within three months of the submission of the request for consultations, the claimant may deliver a notice of intent which shall specify in writing the claimant's intention to submit the claim to dispute settlement, and contain the following information: (a) the name and address of the claimant and, where such request is submitted on behalf of a locally established company, the name, address, and place of incorporation of the locally established company; (b) the provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection) alleged to have been breached; (c) the legal and factual basis for the dispute, including the treatment alleged to breach the provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection); and



(d) the relief sought and the estimated loss or damage allegedly caused to the claimant or its locally established company by reason of that breach. The notice of intent shall be sent to the Union or to Singapore, as the case may be. 2. Where a notice of intent has been sent to the Union, the Union shall make a determination of the respondent within two months from the date of receipt of the notice. The Union shall inform the claimant of this determination immediately, on the basis of which the claimant may submit a claim pursuant to Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal). 3. Where no determination of the respondent has been made pursuant to paragraph 2, the following shall apply: (a) in the event that the notice of intent exclusively identifies treatment by a Member State of the Union, that Member State shall act as respondent;

(b) in the event that the notice of intent identifies any treatment by an institution, body or agency of the Union, the Union shall act as respondent. 4. Where either the Union or a Member State acts as respondent, neither the Union nor the Member State concerned shall assert the inadmissibility of a claim, or otherwise assert that a claim or award is unfounded or invalid, on the ground that the proper respondent should be or should have been the Union rather than the Member State or vice versa.



5. For greater certainty, nothing in this Agreement or the applicable dispute settlement rules shall prevent the exchange, between the Union and the Member State concerned, of all information relating to a dispute. ARTICLE 3.6 Submission of Claim to Tribunal 1. No earlier than three months from the date of the notice of intent delivered pursuant to Article 3.5 (Notice of Intent), the claimant may submit the claim to the Tribunal under one of the following dispute settlement rules: (a) the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States of 18 March 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the "ICSID Convention") provided that both the respondent and the State of the claimant are parties to the ICSID Convention;



(b) the ICSID Convention in accordance with the Rules on the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (hereinafter referred to as "ICSID Additional Facility Rules"), provided that either the respondent or the State of the claimant is a party to the ICSID Convention;

(c) the arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL); or (d) any other rules if the disputing parties so agree. 2. Paragraph 1 of this Article shall constitute the consent of the respondent to the submission of a claim under this Section. The consent under paragraph 1 and the submission of a claim under this Section shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of: (a) Chapter II of the ICSID Convention, and the ICSID Additional Facility Rules, for written consent of the disputing parties; and (b) Article II of the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, done at New York on 10 June 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "New York Convention") for an "agreement in writing".



ARTICLE 3.7 Conditions to the Submission of Claim 1. A claim may be submitted under this Section only if: (a) the submission of the claim is accompanied by the claimant's consent in writing to dispute settlement in accordance with the procedures set out in this Section and the claimant's designation of one of the fora rules referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal) as the rules for dispute settlement;

(b) at least six months have elapsed since the submission of the request for consultations under Article 3.3 (Consultations) and at least three months have elapsed from the submission of the notice of intent under Article 3.5 (Notice of Intent); (c) the request for consultations and the notice of intent submitted by the claimant fulfilled the requirements set out in paragraph 2 of Article 3.3 (Consultations) and paragraph 1 of Article 3.5 (Notice of Intent) respectively; (d) the legal and factual basis of the dispute was subject to prior consultation pursuant to Article 3.3 (Consultations); (e) all the claims identified in the submission of the claim made pursuant to Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal) are based on treatment identified in the notice of intent made pursuant to Article 3.5 (Notice of Intent);



(f) the claimant: (i) withdraws any pending claim submitted to the Tribunal, or to any other domestic or international court or tribunal under domestic or international law, concerning the same treatment as alleged to breach the provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection); (ii) declares that it will not submit such a claim in the future; and (iii) declares that it will not enforce any award rendered pursuant to this Section before such award has become final, and will not seek to appeal, review, set aside, annul, revise or initiate any other similar procedure before an international or domestic court or tribunal, as regards an award pursuant to this Section. 2. For the purposes of subparagraph 1(f), the term "claimant" refers to the investor and, where applicable, to the locally established company. In addition, for the purposes of subparagraph 1(f)(i) the term "claimant" includes all persons who directly or indirectly have an ownership interest in, or who are controlled by the investor or, where applicable, the locally established company. 3. Upon request of the respondent, the Tribunal shall decline jurisdiction where the claimant fails to respect any of the requirements or declarations referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.





4. Subparagraph 1(f) shall not prevent the claimant from seeking interim measures of protection before the courts or administrative tribunals of the respondent prior to the institution or during the pendency of proceedings before any of the dispute settlement fora referred to in Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal). For the purposes of this Article, interim measures of protection shall be for the sole purpose of preservation of the claimant's rights and interests and shall not involve the payment of damages or the resolution of the substance of the matter in dispute. 5. For greater certainty, the Tribunal shall decline jurisdiction where the dispute had arisen, or was very likely to arise, at the time when the claimant acquired ownership or control of the investment subject to the dispute, and the Tribunal determines based on the facts that the claimant has acquired ownership or control of the investment for the main purpose of submitting the claim under this Section. This is without prejudice to other jurisdictional objections which could be entertained by the Tribunal. ARTICLE 3.8 Third Party Funding 1. Any disputing party benefiting from third party funding shall notify the other disputing party and the Tribunal of the name and address of the third party funder. 2. Such notification shall be made at the time of submission of a claim, or without delay as soon as the third party funding is agreed, donated or granted, as applicable.



ARTICLE 3.9 Tribunal of First Instance

1. A Tribunal of First Instance ("Tribunal") is hereby established to hear claims submitted pursuant to Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal). 2. The Committee shall, upon the entry into force of this Agreement, appoint six Members to the Tribunal. For the purposes of this appointment: (a) The EU Party shall nominate two Members; (b) Singapore shall nominate two Members; and (c) The EU Party and Singapore shall jointly nominate two Members, who shall not be nationals of any Member State of the Union or of Singapore. 3. The Committee may decide to increase or to decrease the number of the Members by multiples of three. Additional appointments shall be made on the same basis as provided for in paragraph 2. 4. The Members shall possess the qualifications required in their respective countries for appointment to judicial office, or be jurists of recognised competence. They shall have specialised knowledge of, or experience in, public international law. It is desirable that they have expertise, in particular, in international investment law, international trade law, or the resolution of disputes arising under international investment or international trade agreements.



5. The Members shall be appointed for an eight-year term. However, the inaugural terms of three of the six persons appointed immediately after the entry into force of this Agreement, to be determined by lot, shall extend to twelve years. A Member's term of appointment may be renewed by decision of the Committee upon expiry. Vacancies shall be filled as they arise. A person appointed to replace a person whose term of office has not expired shall hold office for the remainder of the predecessor's term. A person who is serving on a division of the Tribunal when his or her term expires may, with the authorisation of the President of the Tribunal, continue to serve on the division until the closure of the proceedings of that division and shall, for that purpose only, be deemed to continue to be a Member of the Tribunal. 6. There shall be a President and Vice-President of the Tribunal who shall be responsible for organisational issues. They will be appointed for a fouryear term and shall be drawn by lot from among the Members who have been appointed pursuant to paragraph 2(c). They shall serve on the basis of a rotation drawn by lot by the Chair of the Committee. The VicePresident shall replace the President when the President is unavailable.

7. The Tribunal shall hear cases in divisions consisting of three Members, of whom one each shall have been appointed pursuant to paragraphs 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c), respectively. The division shall be chaired by the Member who had been appointed pursuant to paragraph 2(c). 8. Within 90 days of the submission of a claim pursuant to Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal), the President of the Tribunal shall appoint the Members composing the division of the Tribunal hearing the case on a rotation basis, ensuring that the composition of each division is random and unpredictable, while giving equal opportunity to all Members to serve.



9. Notwithstanding paragraph 7, the disputing parties may agree that a case be heard by a sole Member. This Member shall be selected by the President of the Tribunal from amongst those Members who had been appointed pursuant to paragraph 2(c). The respondent shall give sympathetic consideration to such a request from the claimant, in particular where the claimant is a small or medium-sized enterprise or the compensation or damages claimed are relatively low. Such a request should be made at the same time as the filing of the claim pursuant to Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal). 10. The Tribunal shall draw up its own working procedures. 11. The Members of the Tribunal shall ensure that they are available and able to perform the functions set out in this Section. 12. In order to ensure their availability, the Members shall be paid a monthly retainer fee to be fixed by decision of the Committee. The President of the Tribunal and, where applicable, the VicePresident, shall receive a fee equivalent to the fee determined pursuant to Article 3.10(11) (Appeal Tribunal) for each day worked in fulfilling the functions of President of the Tribunal pursuant to this Section. 13. The retainer fee and the daily fees for the President or Vice-President of the Tribunal when working in fulfilling the functions of President of the Tribunal pursuant to this Section shall be paid equally by both Parties into an account managed by the Secretariat of ICSID. In the event that one Party fails to pay the retainer fee or the daily fees, the other Party may elect to pay. Any such arrears will remain payable, with appropriate interest.



14. Unless the Committee adopts a decision pursuant to paragraph 15, the amount of the other fees and expenses of the Members on a division of the Tribunal shall be those determined pursuant to Regulation 14(1) of the Administrative and Financial Regulations of the ICSID Convention in force on the date of the submission of the claim and allocated by the Tribunal among the disputing parties in accordance with Article 3.21 (Costs). 15. Upon a decision by the Committee, the retainer fee and other fees and expenses may be permanently transformed into a regular salary. In such an event, the Members shall serve on a full-time basis and the Committee shall fix their remuneration and related organisational matters. In that event, the Members shall not be permitted to engage in any occupation, whether gainful or not, unless exemption is exceptionally granted by the President of the Tribunal.

16. The Secretariat of ICSID shall act as Secretariat for the Tribunal and provide it with appropriate support. The expenses for such support shall be allocated by the Tribunal among the disputing parties in accordance with Article 3.21 (Costs). ARTICLE 3.10 Appeal Tribunal 1. A permanent Appeal Tribunal is hereby established to hear appeals from provisional awards issued by the Tribunal.



2. The Committee shall, upon the entry into force of this Agreement, appoint six Members to the Appeal Tribunal. For the purposes of this appointment: (a) The EU Party shall nominate two Members; (b) Singapore shall nominate two Members; and (c) The EU Party and Singapore shall jointly nominate two Members, who shall not be nationals of any Member State of the Union or of Singapore. 3. The Committee may decide to increase or to decrease the number of the Members of the Appeal Tribunal by multiples of three. Additional appointments shall be made on the same basis as provided for in paragraph 2.

4. The Appeal Tribunal Members shall possess the qualifications required in their respective countries for appointment to the highest judicial offices, or be jurists of recognised competence. They shall have specialised knowledge of, or expertise in, public international law. It is desirable that they have expertise, in particular, in international investment law, international trade law, or the resolution of disputes arising under international investment or international trade agreements.



5. The Appeal Tribunal Members shall be appointed for an eightyear term. However, the inaugural terms of three of the six persons appointed immediately after the entry into force of this Agreement, to be determined by lot, shall extend to twelve years. A Member's term of appointment may be renewed by decision of the Committee upon expiry. Vacancies shall be filled as they arise. A person appointed to replace a person whose term of office has not expired shall hold office for the remainder of the predecessor's term. A person who is serving on a division of the Appeal Tribunal when his or her term expires may, with the authorisation of the President of the Appeal Tribunal, continue to serve on the division until the closure of the proceedings of that division and shall, for that purpose only, be deemed to continue to be a Member of the Appeal Tribunal. 6. There shall be a President and Vice-President of the Appeal Tribunal who shall be responsible for organisational issues. They will be appointed for a four-year term and shall be drawn by a lot from among the Appeal Tribunal Members who have been appointed pursuant to paragraph 2(c). They shall serve on the basis of a rotation drawn by lot by the Chair of the Committee. The VicePresident shall replace the President when the President is unavailable. 7. The Appeal Tribunal shall hear cases in divisions consisting of three Members, of whom one each shall have been appointed pursuant to paragraphs 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c), respectively. The division shall be chaired by the Member who had been appointed pursuant to paragraph 2(c). 8. The President of the Appeal Tribunal shall appoint the Members composing the division of the Appeal Tribunal hearing the appeal on a rotation basis, ensuring that the composition of each division is random and unpredictable, while giving equal opportunity to all Members to serve. 9. The Appeal Tribunal shall draw up its own working procedures.



10. The Appeal Tribunal Members shall ensure that they are available and able to perform the functions set out in this Section. 11. In order to ensure their availability, the Members shall be paid a monthly retainer fee and receive a fee for each day worked as a Member, to be determined by decision of the Committee. The President of the Appeal Tribunal and, where applicable, the Vice-President, shall receive a fee for each day worked in fulfilling the functions of President of the Appeal Tribunal pursuant to this Section. 12. The retainer fee and the daily fees for the President or Vice-President of the Appeal Tribunal when working in fulfilling the functions of President of the Appeal Tribunal pursuant to this Section shall be paid equally by both Parties into an account managed by the Secretariat of ICSID. In the event that one Party fails to pay the retainer fee or the daily fees, the other Party may elect to pay. Any such arrears will remain payable, with appropriate interest.

13. Upon a decision by the Committee, the retainer fee and the daily fees may be permanently transformed into a regular salary. In such an event, the Appeal Tribunal Members shall serve on a full-time basis and the Committee shall fix their remuneration and related organisational matters. In that event, the Appeal Tribunal Members shall not be permitted to engage in any occupation, whether gainful or not, unless exemption is exceptionally granted by the President of the Appeal Tribunal. 14. The Secretariat of ICSID shall act as Secretariat for the Appeal Tribunal and provide it with appropriate support. The expenses for such support shall be allocated by the Tribunal among the disputing parties in accordance with Article 3.21 (Costs).



ARTICLE 3.11 Ethics 1. The Members of the Tribunal and of the Appeal Tribunal shall be chosen from amongst persons whose independence is beyond doubt. They shall not be affiliated with any government, and in particular, shall not take instructions from any government or organisation with regard to matters related to the dispute. They shall not participate in the consideration of any disputes that would create a direct or indirect conflict of interest. In so doing they shall comply with Annex 7 (Code of Conduct for Members of the Tribunal, the Appeal Tribunal and Mediators). In addition, upon appointment, they shall refrain from acting as counsel, party-appointed expert or partyappointed witness in any pending or new investment protection dispute under this or any other agreement or domestic law. 2. If a disputing party considers that a Member has conflict of interest, it shall send a notice of challenge of that Member's appointment to the President of the Tribunal or to the President of the Appeal Tribunal, respectively. The notice of challenge shall be sent within 15 days of the date on which the composition of the division of the Tribunal or of the Appeal Tribunal has been communicated to the disputing party, or within 15 days of the date on which the relevant facts came to its knowledge, if they could not have reasonably been known at the time of composition of the division. The notice of challenge shall state the grounds for the challenge.



3. If, within 15 days from the date of the notice of challenge, the challenged Member has elected not to resign from that division, the President of the Tribunal or the President of the Appeal Tribunal, respectively, shall, after hearing the disputing parties and after providing the Member an opportunity to submit any observations, issue a decision within 45 days of receipt of the notice of challenge and forthwith notify the disputing parties and other Members of the division. 4. Challenges against the appointment to a division of the President of the Tribunal shall be decided by the President of the Appeal Tribunal and vice versa. 5. Upon a reasoned recommendation from the President of the Appeal Tribunal, the Parties, by decision of the Committee, may decide to remove a Member from the Tribunal or from the Appeal Tribunal where his or her behaviour is inconsistent with the obligations set out in paragraph 1 and incompatible with his continued membership of the Tribunal or Appeal Tribunal. If the behaviour in question is alleged to be that of the President of the Appeal Tribunal then the President of the Tribunal of First Instance shall submit the reasoned recommendation. Articles 3.9(5) (Tribunal of First Instance) and 3.10(4) (Appeal Tribunal) shall apply mutatis mutandis for filling vacancies that may arise pursuant to this paragraph.





ARTICLE 3.12 Multilateral Dispute Settlement Mechanism The Parties shall pursue with each other and other interested trading partners, the establishment of a multilateral investment tribunal and appellate mechanism for the resolution of international investment disputes. Upon establishment of such a multilateral mechanism, the Committee shall consider adopting a decision to provide that investment disputes under this Section will be resolved pursuant to that multilateral mechanism, and to make appropriate transitional arrangements. ARTICLE 3.13 Applicable Law and Rules of Interpretation 1. The Tribunal shall decide whether the treatment that is the subject of the claim is in breach of an obligation under Chapter Two (Investment Protection).



2. Subject to paragraph 3, the Tribunal shall apply this Agreement interpreted in accordance with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other rules and principles of international law applicable between the Parties. 3. Where serious concerns arise as regards issues of interpretation which may affect matters relating to this Agreement, the Committee, pursuant to subparagraph 4(f) of Article 4.1 (Committee), may adopt interpretations of provisions of this Agreement. An interpretation adopted by the Committee shall be binding on the Tribunal and the Appeal Tribunal and any award shall be consistent with that decision. The Committee may decide that an interpretation shall have binding effect from a specific date.

ARTICLE 3.14 Claims Manifestly Without Legal Merit 1. The respondent may, no later than thirty days after the constitution of a division of the Tribunal pursuant to Article 3.9 (Tribunal of First Instance) and in any event before the first session of the division of the Tribunal, file an objection that a claim is manifestly without legal merit.



2. The respondent shall specify as precisely as possible the basis for the objection. 3. The Tribunal, after giving the disputing parties an opportunity to present their observations on the objection, shall, at the first session of the division of the Tribunal or promptly thereafter, issue a decision or provisional award on the objection. 4. This procedure and any decision of the Tribunal shall be without prejudice to the right of a respondent to object, pursuant to Article 3.15 (Claims Unfounded as a Matter of Law) or in the course of the proceedings, to the legal merits of a claim and without prejudice to the Tribunal's authority to address other objections as a preliminary question. ARTICLE 3.15 Claims Unfounded as a Matter of Law

1. Without prejudice to the Tribunal's authority to address other objections as a preliminary question or to a respondent's right to raise any such objections at any appropriate time, the Tribunal shall address and decide as a preliminary question any objection by the respondent that, as a matter of law, a claim, or any part thereof, submitted under this Section is not a claim for which an award in favour of the claimant may be made under Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal), even if the facts alleged were assumed to be true. The Tribunal may also consider any other relevant facts not in dispute.



2. An objection under paragraph 1 shall be submitted to the Tribunal as soon as possible after the division of the Tribunal is constituted, and in no event later than the date the Tribunal fixes for the respondent to submit its counter-memorial or statement of defence or, in the case of an amendment to the claim, the date the Tribunal fixes for the respondent to submit its response to the amendment. An objection may not be submitted under paragraph 1 as long as proceedings under Article 3.14 (Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit) are pending, unless the Tribunal grants leave to file an objection under this Article, after having taken due account of the circumstances of the case. 3. Upon receipt of an objection under paragraph 1, and unless it considers the objection manifestly unfounded, the Tribunal shall suspend any proceedings on the merits, establish a schedule for considering the objection consistent with any schedule it has established for considering any other preliminary question, and issue a decision or provisional award on the objection, stating the grounds therefor. ARTICLE 3.16 Transparency of Proceedings Annex 8 (Rules on Public Access to Documents, Hearings and the Possibility of Third Persons to Make Submissions) shall apply to disputes under this Section.



ARTICLE 3.17 The Non-disputing Party to the Agreement

1. The Tribunal shall accept or, after consultation with the disputing parties, may invite oral or written submissions on issues of treaty interpretation from the non-disputing Party to the Agreement. 2. The Tribunal shall not draw any inference from the absence of any submission or response to any invitation pursuant to paragraph 1. 3. The Tribunal shall ensure that any submission does not disrupt or unduly burden the proceedings, or unfairly prejudice any disputing party. 4. The Tribunal shall also ensure that the disputing parties are given a reasonable opportunity to present their observations on any submission by the non-disputing Party to the Agreement. ARTICLE 3.18 Award 1. Where the Tribunal decides that the treatment in dispute is in breach of an obligation under Chapter Two (Investment Protection), the Tribunal may award, separately or in combination, only:



(a) monetary damages and any applicable interest; and (b) restitution of property, provided that the respondent may pay monetary damages and any applicable interest, as determined by the Tribunal in accordance with Chapter Two (Investment Protection), in lieu of restitution.

2. Monetary damages shall not be greater than the loss suffered by the claimant or, as applicable, its locally established company, as a result of the breach of the relevant provisions of Chapter Two (Investment Protection), reduced by any prior damages or compensation already provided by the Party concerned. The Tribunal shall not award punitive damages. 3. Where a claim is submitted on behalf of a locally established company, the award shall be made to the locally established company. 4. As a general rule, the Tribunal shall issue a provisional award within 18 months of the date of submission of the claim. When the Tribunal considers that it cannot issue its provisional award within 18 months, it shall inform the disputing parties in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will issue its provisional award. A provisional award shall become final if 90 days have elapsed after it has been issued and neither disputing party has appealed the award to the Appeal Tribunal.



ARTICLE 3.19 Appeal Procedure 1. Either disputing party may appeal before the Appeal Tribunal a provisional award, within 90 days of its issuance. The grounds for appeal are: (a) that the Tribunal has erred in the interpretation or application of the applicable law; (b) that the Tribunal has manifestly erred in the appreciation of the facts, including the appreciation of relevant domestic law; or, (c) those provided for in Article 52 of the ICSID Convention, in so far as they are not covered by (a) and (b).

2. If the Appeal Tribunal dismisses the appeal, the provisional award shall become final. The Appeal Tribunal may also dismiss the appeal on an expedited basis where it is clear that the appeal is manifestly unfounded, in which case the provisional award shall become final. 3 If the appeal is well founded, the Appeal Tribunal shall modify or reverse the legal findings and conclusions in the provisional award in whole or in part. The Appeal Tribunal shall refer the matter back to the Tribunal, specifying precisely how it has modified or reversed the relevant findings and conclusions of the Tribunal. The Tribunal shall be bound by the findings and conclusions of the Appeal Tribunal and shall, after hearing the disputing parties if appropriate, revise its provisional award accordingly. The Tribunal shall seek to issue its revised award within 90 days after the referral of the matter back to it.



4. As a general rule, the appeal proceedings shall not exceed 180 days from the date a party to the dispute formally notifies its decision to appeal to the date the Appeal Tribunal issues its decision. When the Appeal Tribunal considers that it cannot issue its decision within 180 days, it shall inform the disputing parties in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will issue its decision. In no case should the proceedings exceed 270 days. 5. A disputing party lodging an appeal shall provide security for the costs of appeal. The disputing party shall also provide any other security as may be ordered by the Appeal Tribunal. 6. The provisions of Articles 3.8 (Third-Party Funding), Annex 8 (Rules on Public Access to Documents, Hearings and the Possibility of Third Persons to Make Submissions), 3.17 (The Nondisputing Party to the Agreement) and Article 3.21 (Costs) shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the appeal procedure. ARTICLE 3.20 Indemnification or Other Compensation The respondent may not assert, and the Tribunal shall not accept, as a defence, counterclaim, right of setoff, or for any other reason, that the claimant has received or will receive indemnification or other compensation, pursuant to an insurance or guarantee contract, for all or part of the damages sought in a dispute initiated under this Section.





ARTICLE 3.21 Costs 1. The Tribunal shall order that the costs of the proceedings shall be borne by the unsuccessful disputing party. In exceptional circumstances the Tribunal may apportion costs between the disputing parties if it determines that apportionment is appropriate in the circumstances of the case. 2. Other reasonable costs, including costs of legal representation and assistance, shall be borne by the unsuccessful party, unless the Tribunal determines that such apportionment of costs is not appropriate in the circumstances of the case. 3. Where only some parts of the claims have been successful, the costs awarded shall be adjusted, proportionately, to the number or extent of the successful parts of the claims. 4. Where a claim or parts of a claim are dismissed on application of Article 3.14 (Claims Manifestly without Legal Merits) or Article 3.15 (Claims Unfounded as a Matter of Law), the Tribunal shall order that all costs relating to such a claim or parts thereof, including the costs of the proceedings and other reasonable costs, including costs of legal representation and assistance, shall be borne by the unsuccessful disputing party.



5. The Committee shall consider adopting supplemental rules on fees for the purpose of determining the maximum amount of costs of legal representation and assistance that may be borne by specific categories of unsuccessful disputing parties. Such supplemental rules shall take into account the financial resources of a claimant which is a natural person or a small or mediumsized enterprise. The Committee shall endeavour to adopt such supplemental rules no later one year after the entry into force of this Agreement. ARTICLE 3.22 Enforcement of Awards

1. An award rendered pursuant to this section shall not be enforceable until it has become final pursuant to Articles 3.18(4) (Award), 3.19(2) (Appeal Procedure), or 3.19(3) (Appeal Procedure). Final awards issued pursuant to this Section by the Tribunal shall be binding between the disputing parties and shall not be subject to appeal, review, set aside, annulment or any other remedy. 2. Each Party shall recognise an award rendered pursuant to this Agreement as binding and enforce the pecuniary obligation within its territory as if it were a final judgement of a court in that Party.



3. Execution of the award shall be governed by the laws concerning the execution of judgments or awards in force where such execution is sought. 4. For greater certainty, Article 4.11 (No Direct Effect) of Chapter Four (Institutional, General and Final Provisions) shall not prevent the recognition, execution and enforcement of awards rendered pursuant to this Section. 5. For the purposes of Article I of the New York Convention, final awards issued pursuant to this Section are arbitral awards relating to claims that are considered to arise out of a commercial relationship or transaction. 6. For greater certainty and subject to paragraph 1, where a claim has been submitted to dispute settlement pursuant to Article 3.6(1)(a) (Submission of Claim to Tribunal), a final award issued pursuant to this Section shall qualify as an award under Section 6 of Chapter IV of the ICSID Convention. ARTICLE 3.23 Role of the Parties to the Agreement 1. Neither Party shall give diplomatic protection, or bring an international claim, in respect of a dispute which one of its investors and the other Party shall have consented to submit or have submitted to dispute settlement under this Section, unless such other Party has failed to abide by and comply with the award rendered in such dispute. Diplomatic protection, for the purposes of this paragraph, shall not include informal diplomatic exchanges for the sole purpose of facilitating a settlement of the dispute.





2. For greater certainty, paragraph 1 shall not exclude the possibility of a Party having recourse to dispute settlement procedures under Chapter Three (Dispute Settlement) Section B (Resolution of Disputes between Parties) in respect of a measure of general application even if that measure is alleged to have breached the Agreement as regards a specific investment in respect of which a claim has been submitted pursuant to Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal) and is without prejudice to Article 3.17 (The Non-disputing Party to the Agreement). ARTICLE 3.24 Consolidation 1. Where two or more claims that have been submitted separately under Article 3.6 (Submission of Claim to Tribunal) have a question of law or fact in common and arise out of the same events or circumstances, a disputing party may seek the establishment of a separate division of the Tribunal ("consolidating division") and request that such division issue a consolidation order in accordance with: (a) the agreement of all the disputing parties sought to be covered by the order, in which case the disputing parties shall submit a joint request in accordance with paragraph 3; or (b) paragraphs 2 through 12, provided that only one respondent