European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation creating the
Rapid Reaction Facility (COM(2000) 119Wdash C5-0272/2000 Wdash 2000/0081(CNS))
(Consultation procedure)
The European Parliament,
Ddash having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2000) 119)(1),
Ddash having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Article 308 of the EC Treaty (C5-0272/2000),Ddash having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
Ddash having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security
and Defence Policy and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A5-0392/2000),
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the
EC Treaty;
3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parlia-
ment;
4. Calls for the conciliation procedure to be initiated should the Council intend to depart from the text
approved by Parliament;
5. Asks to be consulted again if the Council intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;
6. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
(1) OJ C 311E, 31.10.2000, p. 213.
8. Frontier workers
A5-0338/2000
European Parliament resolution on the situation of frontier workers (2000/2010(INI))
The European Parliament,
Ddash having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Articles 2, 10, 39, 40, 41, 42, 136, 137, 158 and
159 thereof,
Ddash having regard to the many petitions that it has received on the problems of frontier workers, former
frontier workers and those of their dependent partners and families,
Ddash having regard to the recommendations of 18 March 1997 by the High-Level Panel on free movement
of workers and the subsequent action plan (COM(1997) 586),
Ddash having regard to its resolutions of 16 December 1988 on the problems of frontier workers in the
Community(1), 9 February 1993on living and working conditions in frontier regions(2) and 28 May
1998 on the situation of frontier workers in the European Union(3), and the recommendations con-
tained therein,
Ddash having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation on coordination of social security systems(4),
and a fundamental simplification and review of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71),
(1) OJ C 12, 16.1.1989, p. 378.
(2) OJ C 72, 15.3.1993, p. 43.
(3) OJ C 195, 22.6.1998, p. 49.
(4) OJ C 38, 12.2.1999, p. 10.C 262/148 EN 18.9.2001 Official Journal of the European Communities
Wednesday 17 January 2001
Ddash having regard to the proposals for a European Parliament and Council regulation amending Regula-
tion (EEC) No 1612/68 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community(1), a European
Parliament and Council directive amending Directive 68/360/EEC on the abolition of restrictions onmovement and residence within the Community for workers of Member States and their families(
2),
a European Parliament and Council decision establishing an Advisory Committee on freedom ofmovement and social security for Community workers and amending Council Regulations (EEC)No 1612/68 and (EEC) No 1408/71(
3), and a Council regulation amending Regulation (EEC) 1408/
71 as regards its extension to nationals of third-countries(4);
Ddash having regard to Rule 163of its Rules of Procedure,
Ddash having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A5-0338/2000),
A. whereas there must be a social counterpart to monetary Union; whereas this has been acknowledged
at the European Councils in Lisbon and Feira,
B. whereas a coordinated European approach towards protecting persons making use of freedom of
movement is of key importance for the proper functioning of the internal labour market,
C. whereas the single market cannot be said to be complete unless free movement of goods, services and
capital is accompanied by free movement of persons,
D. whereas, in frontier regions in particular, the labour market benefits from the removal of obstacles to
frontier work, thereby effectively promoting acceptance of a job in another Member State,
E. having regard to the fundamental principles based on the outlawing of discrimination on grounds of
nationality and on equal treatment with national citizens,
F. whereas adequate rules on frontier work are of essential importance for healthy labour conditions and
for preventing unfair competition,
G. whereas with the accession of new States to the European Union the number of frontier workers will
increase,
H. whereas the existing European coordinating regulation, 1408/71, is no longer adequate because:
Ddash it coordinates social security in accordance with the principle of the country of employment.
Fiscal aspects are not subject to European coordination and are regulated on a bilateral basis.More and more elements of national social security systems are becoming sourced from publicfunding, which results in greater uncertainty at the workplace and the creation of parafiscalcharges whose status is not clear,
Ddash it always coordinates changes in national social security systems retrospectively. At the time when
national legislation changes, the impact on the group is usually unknown; the legal implicationsand possible infringements of fundamental European principles are tested afterwards and solu-tions/compensation for the victims come when the damage has already been done;
Ddash there is no longer a clear distinction in Member States between social assistance and social secur-
ity,
I. whereas the existing European coordination rules for health care and medical costs are inadequate:
Ddash because of differences between public and private systems,Ddash because after an active working life, benefits and options are restricted in accordance with the
principle of the country of residence,
(1) OJ C 344, 12.11.1998, p. 9.
(2) OJ C 344, 12.11.1998, p. 12.
(3) OJ C 344, 12.11.1998, p. 16.
(4) OJ C 6, 10.1.1998, p. 15.18.9.2001 EN C 262/149 Official Journal of the European Communities
Wednesday 17 January 2001
Ddash because dependent partners and/or family members are excluded from provisions and benefits in
the country of employment,
J. whereas the coordination rules are also inadequate with regard to social security and whereas they
cause difficulties, for example:
Ddash in the area of child benefit, care allowances and study grants for dependent family members;
Ddash with regard to the problems in relation to incapacity for work and unemployment, and in par-
ticular suitability for a labour market other than that in the country of residence;
Ddash with regard to day care for the elderly because of differences in the way systems are designed and
contributions and differences in pensionable age;
Ddash because of the problems arising from inadequate coordination under Regulation 1408/71 of
social security, social assistance and supplementary schemes;
K. whereas the European Parliament has repeatedly stressed the need for a solution to these problems at
Community level,
L. whereas the Commission has made proposals for amending Regulations 1408/71 and 1612/68 and
Directive 68/360/EEC, with the aim of simplification, modernisation, streamlining and adequate provi-
sion to cater for the needs of workers from third countries,
M. whereas there has been no progress in the Council with regard to these proposals, which is very
regrettable given the extent of the labour market problems occurring in frontier regions,
N. whereas the consultants in the Member States operating within the EURES system have made an
excellent contribution towards elucidating, and reporting on, the problems of cross-border working,and whereas thanks to their unremitting efforts they have contributed towards both general and indi-vidual solutions,
O. whereas the European Parliament has delivered a clear opinion on a number of proposals and expects
an adequate response from the Council;
P. whereas the European Court of Justice has all too often had to reprimand Member States in respect of
inconsistencies between national legislation and the European principle of free movement,
1. Regrets that the Commission, Council and Member States did not accept the recommendations made
by the European Parliament in its abovementioned resolution of 28 May 1998;
2. Calls on the Commission to draft a directive providing for the introduction of ‘frontier-effect’ reports.
Such reports would oblige Member States, when changing their legislation on social security, taxation,employment, systems of provisions and benefits for health care, unemployment and incapacity to work,child allowances, study grants, pension systems and other social schemes, to study the impact on frontierworkers, while taking care that this does not lead to legal uncertainty; considers that this directive shouldalso create a framework for a compensation scheme based on the principle that if, after carrying out sucha frontier-effect report, a Member State amends social or fiscal legislation which is unfairly detrimental tofrontier workers, it must compensate them for the loss of income incurred;
3. Calls on the Council to take positive action with all possible expedition to adopt a position on the
modernisation and simplification of Regulation 1408/71. Adequate coordination will be possible with theproposed extension of the scope and application of the target group, which received a positive responsefrom Parliament at first reading. Solutions to many problems can be found through: (i) proposals to extendaccess by dependent family members of frontier workers, retired frontier workers and dependent membersof their families to health care provisions and benefits in the country of residence and country of employ-ment; (ii) proposals for compensating and streamlining of agreements on early retirement and pensionschemes; (iii) proposals to improve the cross-border provision of labour and facilities for job applicationsfor the unemployed;C 262/150 EN 18.9.2001 Official Journal of the European Communities
Wednesday 17 January 2001
4. Calls on the Commission, before the end of 2001, to organise an international conference for the
Member States and applicant countries concerning the position of frontier workers and the consequencesof the relevant present and future European legislation for them;
5. Calls for a study and an assessment with a view to inserting in Regulation 1408/71 the payment by a
single State of pensions covered by agreements, with direct reimbursement of the appropriate percentagesbetween the States concerned;
6. Calls on the Commission to recommend to Member States that in their bilateral practices they have
regard to the complications generated by the mismatches between taxation and social security systems inthe case of frontier workers, and ensure that tax arrangements comply with Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71(country of employment principle);
7. Calls on the Commission to recommend to Member States that in their bilateral practices they have
regard to the complications generated by the mismatches between taxation and social security systems inthe case of posted workers;
8. Calls on the Council and the Commission, pursuant to the Luxembourg process, to give thought to
the extent and nature of frontier work;
9. Welcomes the new initiatives by social security agencies, which in the health sector, for example,
have established cross-frontier services for frontier workers; calls on the Commission to support suchinitiatives and promote exchanges of experience and best practices;
10. Calls on the Council and the Commission to propose measures to remove obstacles to the mobility
of stagiaires, students, volunteers and researchers;
11. Calls on the Commission to set up a system to monitor the implementation of measures to protect
frontier workers, with special reference to areas where bilateral agreements with EFTA countries are inforce;
12. Calls on the Commission to adopt a position as soon as possible on the consequences of the deci-
sions of the European Court of Justice in the Kohll and Decker cases(
1) and related cases, now that it
appears that residents of the Member States, including frontier workers, can under certain circumstancesbenefit from health provisions in other Member States;
13. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission.
(1) Cases C-158/96 and C-120/95 respectively.
9. Environmental directives
B5-0038/2001
European Parliament resolution on the satisfactory implementation of environment directives
The European Parliament,
Ddash having regard to Oral Question B5-0556/2000 by its Committee on the Environment, Public Health
and Consumer Policy and having regard to the answer by the Commission,
Ddash having regard to its resolutions of 17 January 2001 on the implementation of Directive 96/59/EC on
the disposal of PCBs and PCTs (2000/2112(INI))(1), on the implementation of Directive 92/43/EEC on
habitats (2000/2111(INI))(2) and on the implementation of Directive 91/676/EEC on nitrates (2000/
2110(INI))(3),
(1) ‘Texts Adopted’, Item 4.
(2) ‘Texts Adopted’, Item 3.
(3) ‘Texts Adopted’, Item 2.18.9.2001 EN C 262/151 Official Journal of the European Communities
Wednesday 17 January 2001