ARCHIVESHISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(76)286
Vol.1976/0089

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement (CEE,Euratom) n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernant l'ouverture aupublicdesarchiveshistoriques delaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement (CE,Euratom) n°1700/2003 du22septembre 2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003, p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation (EEC,Euratom) No354/83of1February 1983
concerning theopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropean Economic
Community andtheEuropean AtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983, p.1),as
amended byRegulation (EC,Euratom) No1700/2003 of22September 2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003, p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary, classifieddocuments inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformity withArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung (EWG,Euratom) Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar 1983überdieFreigabe derhistorischen Archive derEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom) Nr.1700/2003 vom22.September 2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003, S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit
erforderlich, wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenannten Verordnung freigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COM(76)286 final.
Brussels ,9June1976
> 1 .
\
Proposal fora
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC)
fixing,forthe1976/77sugarmarketingyear,thedifferential charge
onrawpreferential sugarandthedifferential amounttobegranted
forrawcanesugarfromtheFrenchoverseasdepartments
(submittedtotheCouncilbytheCommission )
COM(76)286final

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
ThebasiosugarRegulation requiresthatwherethemargin
necessary fortherefiningofrawpreferential sugarexoeeds
therawbeetrefining margintakenintoacoountinthe
determination oftherelevant Community pricesaohargeshall
beleviedonrawpreferential sugarwhenitisrefinedin
a"mixed"refinery#Itisproposedthattheohargefixedfor
1975/76shouldberetainedin1976/77*
ThebasioRegulation alsoprovidesthatanamountequalto
theabovechargeshallbegrantedforDOMrawsugarrefined
ina"pure"refinery#

Proposalfora
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC)
fixing,forthe1976/77sugarmarketing year,thedifferential
chargeonrawpreferential sugarandthedifferential
amounttobegrantedforrawcanesugarfromtheFrench _■
overseas departments
THECOUNCIL OPTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,
Havingregardto-theTreatyestablishing theEuropean Economic Community ^~
HavingregardtoCouncilRegulation (EEC)No3330/74of19December1974onthecommon'
organization ofthemarketinsugar(l),aslastamendedbyRegulation (ESC)NO832/76(2),
andinparticular Articles 9(5)and.47(l)thereof,
Havingregardtotheproposal fromtheCommission ,
WhereasArticle46(l)ofRegulation (EEC)No3330/74providesthatwherethereisa
difference between,ontheonehand,therawsugarrefining margintakenintoaccount
inthedetermination oftheintervention andthreshold pricesforrawsugarand,on
theotherhand,themarginnecessary fortherefining ofrawpreferential sugar,a
differential chargetobemadeonthelattersugarshallbefixedforthesugar
marketing yearinquestion ;
'Whereasthebulkoftherawpreferential sugarcannotberefinedunlessuseismadeof
therefineries asdefinedinArticle9(7)ofthesaidRegulation ?whereas
themarginrequired fortherefining ofthesaidsusrarinsuchrefineries isgreater
ontheinformation at'presenttohandthanthattakenintoaccountwhendetermining
theintervention andthreshold pricesforrawsugarforthe1976/77sugarmarketing
yearjwhereasadifferential chargeshouldtherefore befixedforthatyear;
whereastheamountthereofmaybefixedataflatrateof1,20unitsofaccount
per100kilogrammes ofsugarexpressed aswhitesugar,takingintoaccountthe'
differences incertainofthecomponents oftherefiningcostsforthesaidraw;
WhereasArticle46(2)(b)ofthe"saidRegulation grondesforthe
non-application ofthewholeofthecharge,orpartofthecharge,toanyrawpreferential
sugarwhichisimportedintoregionsoftheCommunity andrefinedthereinaproduction
unitotherthanarefineryasdefinedinArticle9(7)thereofjwhereas, __
havingregardtothetraditional patternsoftradeinthesugartoIreland,atotalquantity of30000metrictonsofthatsugarexpressed aswhitesugarimported ana
refinedinthatregionbetween 1November 1975and30June1976wasexempted fromthe
differential charge;whereas,forthesamereasons,thatexemption ,shouldbecontinuedinrespectofIrelandforthe1976/77sugarmarketingyeari
1)0JNoL359,31.12.1974 ,p.l
2)0JNoL100,14.4.1976 ,p.l

-2-
Whereasthesecondsubparagraph ofArticle9(3)ofthesaid
Regulation provides ,inparticular ,thatwhereadifferential chargehas
beenfixed,adifferential amountequaltothatchargeshallbegranted
fortherawsugarproducedintheFrenchoverseasdepartments andrefined
inarefinery asdefinedinparagraph 7ofthatArticleandwhichis
situated intheCommunity ;whereasthatamountshouldtherefore befixed
at1.20unitsofaccountper100kilogrammes ofwhitesugar»
HASADOPTED THISREGULATION :
Article 1
ThisRegulation shallapplyforthe1976/77sugarmarketing year.
Article 2
Thedifferential charge 1referredtoinArticle46(l)ofRegulation (EEC.)
No3330/74shallbefixedat1.20unitsofaccountper100kilogrammes of
sugarexpressed aswhitesugarbyreference toarawsugaryieldcalculated
bydoubling thedegreeofpolarization ofthatsugaranddeducting 100
therefrom .
Nevertheless ,thischargeshallnotapplytorawpreferential sugarrefinedduringthe1976/77sugarmarketingyearinIrelanduptoamaximumquantity
of30000metrictonsofsugarexpressed aswhitesugar*
»
Article 3
Thedifferential amountreferredtointhesecondsubparagraph ofArticle9(3)ofRegulation (EEC)No3330/74shallbefixedat1.20
unitsofaccountper100kilogrammes ofwhitesugar.
ThisRegulation shallbebindinginitsentirety anddirectlyapplicable
inallMemberStates.
DoneatBrussels , FortheCouncil

ΕrJE11 DATE(1/6/76
î.LionsBUDGÉTAIRE CONCEHNEE »Art,110(recettessucre)etposte6414(mesuressucreDOM)
2.INTITULE DEL'ACTIONIPropoâfcion deRèglement duConseilfixantpourlacampagne
sucrière1976/77lacotisation différentielle àpercevoir surlesucrepréféren­tielbrutetlemontantdifférentiel àaccorder ausucrebrutdecannedesDOM
français.
3.BASEJURIDIQUE,ARTICLES 9ET47DUR.3330/74duConseil
4.OBJECTIFS DEL'ACTION Tpercevoir unecotisation surlesucrepreferentiel brut
etoctroyer cemêmemontantausucrebrutdesDOMpouréviterdesdistorsions
deconcurrence entrelesraffineries concernées »
5.INCIDENTES FIHANCIERES J5.0DEPENSES IPENDANTLACAKPACTEjEXERCICE ENCOURS(76)EXERCICESUIVANT(77|
I-AUCHARCEDUBUDGETDELACE [
(REÏDODIRMIS/LNTEHVENTIONS) I4,02mioucI1,7miouc I2,32miouc1
-AUCHARGEADMINISTR.NATIONALES [
-AUCHARGED'AUTRESSECTEURSVATIERAUXJ I
5.1RECETTES N |-RESSOURCES PROPRESCE(SUCRE)Inégligeable I - -
-SURLEPLANNATIONAL J|L I
5.0.1ECHEANCIER PLURIANNUEL DEPENSES
5.1.1ECHEANCIER PLURIANNUELRECETTESAUHE&•••••••••••• AKKKE«# ANNIE
mesurelimitéeàlacampagne 1976/77
5.2KODEDECALOJL300.000tX12Uc/t=3,6fflÍOUC
Incidence doubletaux=0,42mióuc
4,02Mioucdont1,7miouc
àfinancerdansl'exercice 1976et2,32mioucdansl'exercice 1977*
6.0FINANCEXEUT POSSIBLE PARCREDITSINSCRITS AUCHAPITRE CONCERNE DANSLEBUDGETEJCOURSD'EXECUTION OUI
6.2NECESSITE D'UNBUDGETSUPPLEMENTAIRE «B/NON
6.3CREDITS AINSCRIRE DANSLESBUDGETS FUTURSXAÎYNON
OBSERVATIONS F