ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(75)416
Vol.1975/0160

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement (CEE,Euratom) n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernant l'ouverture aupublicdesarchiveshistoriques delaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement (CE,Euratom) n°1700/2003 du22septembre 2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003, p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation (EEC,Euratom) No354/83of1February 1983
concerning theopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropean Economic
Community andtheEuropean AtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983, p.1),as
amended byRegulation (EC,Euratom) No1700/2003 of22September 2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003, p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary, classifieddocuments inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformity withArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung (EWG,Euratom) Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar 1983überdieFreigabe derhistorischen Archive derEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom) Nr.1700/2003 vom22.September 2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003, S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit
erforderlich, wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenannten Verordnung freigegeben.

COMMISSION JDF.THI EDSOPEAN .r/i^iMUNTTIBS
COM(75)416 final
Brussels ,18July 1975
COMMISSION REPORT TOTHE COUNCIL
ontheforeseeable developments intheplanting
andreplanting ofvineyards intheCommunity and
ontheratio between production andutilization
inthe wine sector
COM(75 )416final

SUKMARY OFCONTENTS
Page
I.INTRODUCTION ......... 1
II.DEVELOPMENTS INTHEAREAUNDERVINESINTHECOJJMBNITT .1
1.Development oftheareaundervinesinindividual
producer MemberStates 2
(a)Germany................................... 2
(b)France 2
(c)Italy 3
(d)Luxembourg 4
2.Development oftheareaundervinesintheCommunity
asawhole 5
III.INCREASE INTHEQUANTITY OFWINEPRODUCED INTHE
COMMUNITY 6
1.Influence ofchangesintheestimated areaunder
vinesin1974/75°nfutureproduction 6
2.Development ofproduction since1964/65.••••••••♦•• 6
IV.COMMUNITY ENDEAVOURS TOIMPROVE WINEPRODUCTION AND
PROCESSING -STRUCTURES 8
V.MARKETSITUATION 9
1.DemandforwineintheCommunity 9
2.Development ofpricesandCommunity intervention
measures 10
3.Trade 12
(a)Intracommunity trade 12
(b)Importsfromnon-member countries 13
(c)Exportstonon-member countries 14
VI.CONCLUSIONS TOBEDRAMFROMDEVELOPMENTS INWINE .
PRODUCTION ANDTHEMARKETINWINE 14
Annexes :Tables 1-
Graphs1-19
6

I.INTRODUCTION
TheCommission isrequired "byArticle 17(4 )"ofRegulation (EEC)
No8I6/7Otosubmit totheCouncil ,before theendofeach year ,areport
which ,inparticular ,records tue .ratio "between production andutilization
andestimates foreseeable changes inthat ratio onthe "basis ,inparticu­
lar ,oftheforecasts provided forinparagraph 3ofArticle 17.Thepur­
pose ofthis report istoprovide theCouncil with theinformation neces­
sary toenable ittodecide upon future Community wine policy ,with parti­
cular references toanynecessary measures which may "betoprevent the
formation ofstructural surpluses ,inparticular "bytaking account ofqua­
lity considerations .
Thepreparation ofthis report hasbeen delayed bytheserious
difficulties encountered onthewine market since thebeginning of1975 *
This delay has ,however ,hadtheadvantage ofenabling more reliable fi­
gures tobeused forthetwoprevious wine growing years .
II.DEVELOPMENTS INTHEAREA UNDERVINE SINTHE COMMUNITY
Theincrease intheareas producing wine grape intheCommunity
issetoutintables 1,2,3,and4*Only theareas under vines inthefour
main producer Member States areincluded .Theareas under vines intheother
Member States arenotincluded ,since ,inaccordance with Article 1,first
2paragraph ,ofRegulation No143 ,aslast modified bytheAct c.fAoo. -ssir -ja
together withAKticle 1ofRegulation (EEC)No1135/70^thatwine
growers intheMember States inwhich thetotal outdoors area under vines
does notexceed 100heotares areexempt from theobligation tonotify their
intentions astotheplanting ,replanting orgrubbing ofvineyards .
_ ./•
(1)OJNoL99of5Kay1970 ,page 1-
(2)OJNoL127/2789 of1December 1^62 ,page 2789/62
(3)0JNo1134of19June 1970 ,page 2

-2-
1.Foreseeable charges in "thearea undor vines inthe individual Member
Status
(a)GERTANY :slight increase andonly forquality wines p.s.r .
Anincrease of0.7fcompared with thearea under vines in1973/74
naybeexpected forGermany during thecurrent wine growing year ,
whereas theincrease fortheprevious wine-growing year was2.5^.
Germany has ,therefore ,considerably slowed down expansion ofthe
area under vines .Itshould bepointed outthat newplantings have
greatly diminished andthat therate ofreplantings isincreasing
(table l).Thehigh percentage ofvines notyetinproduction can
beexplained bytherelatively short life ofvines inthenorthern
areas .Inview oftheincrease inthearea under vines inGermany
uptothepresent andthedirection taken bythewine policy of
that Member State ,itisnotsurprising that theplanned expansion
only covers areas which were delimited for theproduction ofquality
wines p.s.r .(table2).Ifthevarious wine-growing areas ofGermany
aretaken into consideration ,itmaybenoted that theincrease in
German wine-growing areas particularly affects theSMbaden region .
Since Rheinhessen-Pfalz made substantial increases inthe area under
vines during thepreceding wine-growing year ,ithasnotplanned
further extensions (table 3).
(b)FRANCE :increase inProvence andforquality wines p.s.r .inthe
Lansniedoc
The area under vines inFrance remains atmore orless the same level
throughout thecountry .During thecurrent wine-growing year ,itis
planned toincrease theareabyonly O.tyl compared with 1973/74*
Compared with data from thepreceding wine-growing year ,thedata
forthe .newplantings arelower whereas those forreplantings and
grubbings aredistinctly higher (table l).Newplantings affect the
region ofCognac andareas intended fortheproduction ofquality
wines p.s.r .Thearea affected byreplantings during thecurrent
wine-growing year shows anincrease intherate ofrenewal ofthe
area under vines oompared with thetwopreceding wine-growing years .

-3–
Thefact that "thearea tobereplanted fortable vrines exceeds almost
"byhalf that forquality wines p.s.r .should notconceal thefact that
thorenewal ofFrench vineyards concerns first ofallquality wines
p.s.r .since 26fcofFrench vineyards produce table wines (table 2).
Ifthedevelopment ofwine-growing inthevarious regions ofFrance
isstudied ,rather large differences arefound (tr.ble 3).Inthesphere
oftable wines acontinuation ofthedecline inthearea producing
table wines maybeejected .uring thecurrent wine-growing year inall
thewine-growing regions ofFrance .This decrease isparticularly
large intheregions ofAquitaine ,Jlidi-Pyrenees andPays delaLoire .
Even intheLanguedoc ,which isaparticularly important region for
theproduction oftable wines ,thearea devoted totable wines is
decreasing although itvrasstill expanding during theprevious wine~
growing year .Thesituation inthesector ofquality wines p.s.r .is
quite different .Except fortheregions ofCentre ,Pays delaLoire ,
Poitou-Charentes andAuvergne ,anincrease inthearea producing qua­
lity wines p.s.r .isexpected during thecurrent wine-growing year .
Thie increase should reach quite large proportions intheregions of
Aquitaine ,Champagne ,Provence-CSte d'Azur ,andespecially theLangue -
doc.Theregion ofCognae continues toexpand itsproduction .New
plantings accounted for 20000hectares from 1970 to1974«Newautho­
rizations toplant were granted in1975 for 7500hectares ,tobe
set-off against atotal quota of30000hectares ,thebalance ofwhich
will subsequently bemade available according toneeds .
(c)ITALY :increase intable wines inthesouth andquality wines p.s,r .
inthe north
Anincrease of0.7/^compared with theareaunder vines in1973/74?
that istosay0*1% more than theplanned increase forthe previous
wine-growing year ,maybeexpected forItalian vineyards during the
current wine-growing year .Following thetrends already observed in
theprevious report ,thearea intended fornewplantings in1974/75
greatly exceeds that envisaged during thethree preceding wine-growing
; ; ./.
This percentage wascalculated onthebasis ofinformation from theSOEC
forthe1973/74wine-growing year

-4-
years ,whereas thearea intended forreplanting in1973/1974 wa3
slightly smaller than thecorresponding area fortheprevious wine-
growing year (table l).Inthesector ofquality wines p.s.r .in
Italy thearea intended for n.-Q-;plantings in1974/75isslightly smal­
lerthan during thetwoprevious wine*-grcwing years ,whereas that for
replanting during the sane year ismuch smaller .With regard tota­
blewines ,theareas ofnewplantings andreplantings planned for
1974/75aremuch larger than during thetwopreceding marketing years
(table 2).
Ifthedevelopment invine-growing inthevarious regions ofItaly
arestudied ,aforeseeable increase intheproduction oftable wines
inthemajority ofthewine-growing regions ofItaly and ofquality
wines p.s.r .inallofthem maybeexpected (table 3)^Theextension
ofareas producing table .wines isparticularly marked inApulia and
Sicily andthat ofareas producing quality wines p.s.r .isespecially
noticeable inPiedmont ,Tuscany andApulia .Itisnottherefore the
same regions asduring theprevious wine-growing year which arein­
creasing theproduction ofquality wines p.s.r .Theproduction of
table wines inPiedmont andTuscany isdeclining ,that istosaythese
tweregions areincreasing their production ofquality wines p.s.r .
(d)mXS-iBOUPiG :increase mainly incmality wines p.s.r .
Thearea under vines inLuxembourg isexpected toincrease by0.7 /';
during thecurrent wine-growing year"' ".Hewplantings andreplantings
during thesame period will ,asinthepreceding winc-growing year ,
particularly affect areas producing quality wines p.s.r .(tables 1
and2).
./•
Asaresult ofamisinterpretation oftheconcepts of"grubbing "and
"replanting "theincrease inthe -area under vines inLuxembourg hadbeen
fixed at3«3/-forthe1973/74wine-growing year whereas -itwasonly 0.4%
(of.Doc.S/II83/74&&<!•of28November 1974/•

\
2.Foreseeable developments in -theareas under vines inthe Community as
awhole
According tothedata intable 1andincrease of14288hectares
inthearea under vines intheComiaunity ,which represents anincrease of
0.6$ compared with theexisting areaunder vines in1973/74»may "beexpec­
tedforthecurrent wine-growing year ,against 0.5^' forthepreceding year .
This figure takes into account newplantings ,replantings andgrubbings .
Thearea ofnewplantings isabout thesame asthat which v:asplanned during
thepreceding wine-growing year .Thearea forwhich replanting isplanned
isconsiderably larger than inthetwopreceding wine-growing years (table l)
Inthesector ofquality wines p.s.r .thenewplantings planned for1974/75
areless than forthetwopreceding wine-growing years ,whereas replantings
planned for1974/1975 exceed those planned for1972/1973 and1973/l974 «
With regard totable wines newplantings andreplantings planned for1974/75
areupon thetwopreceding wine-growing years ,"butadecrease inthearea
under vines should nonetheless "beexpected ase,result ofgrubbings (table 2)
Itisinteresting tonote that plantings ,replantings and'grubbings carried
outduring thewine-growing year donottally with theforecasts provided
"bytheMember States forthat wine-growing year .
Tabic 4shows that thedecline inthearea producing' wine grapes
intheCommunity since 1967/68seems tohave ended with the1971/72wine-
growing year andthat there isnowaslight tendency forthearea toin­
crease .
Since anotinconsiderable part oftheproduction oftable-grape
vines isused for iri.no making ,thedevelopments in.»this sector should be
taken into consideration .Table 5shows that theoutdoor ?areas producing
table-grapes intheCommunity ,particularly inItaly ,areincreasing
slightly (cf.table 18).

III.INCREASE IN'THE"QUANTITY OFWIK3PRODUCED INTHE!COM-miTY ~
1.Influonco ofchangesintheestimated wine-crowing ares,ini974/75
onfutureproduction
Theeffectofnewplantings ,replantings andgrubbings inthe
currentvrine-growing yearonfutureproduction istoincrease annu­
alproduction (table6)intheCommunity asawholeandineachof
theMemberStates,exceptfor"otherwines"inFranceand"tablewine"
inLuxembourg .Thisincreaseissubstantial inthesectorofquality
-winesp.s.r.sinceitamountsto2.9/a.ortheCommunity asawhole,
hutitisnonetheless lowerthanthe4»40recordedforthepreceding
wine-growing year.Theexpectedincreaseof0.9/iintheproduction
oftablewinesintheCommunity isaboutthesamea3duringthepre­
cedingwine-growing yearwith0.7/£.
Asforthepreceding wine–growingyear,theforeseeable increase
intheproduction ofqualitywinesp.s.r.duringthecurrentwine-
growingyearinItalyisat6»"jfomuch .greaterthantheincreasein
;theotherMemberStates.Prance'sincreaseinqualityvine,p.s.r.
production isonly1.1$£,Germany2,0>andLuxembourg 2.9^»The
ejectedincreasefortrJblewinesinItalyof1.3$ismuchgreater
thanthatexpectedinPrance(0.3';').Despiteanexpecteddecrease
*•'■■\ '*' '•'intheareaproducing tablewinesinFranco(seetable2),aslight
increaseintheproduction ofthesewinesmaybeexpected during
thecurrentwine-growing year.Thisfactoanonlybeexplained by
theincreaseproductivity ofnewplantings andreplantings compared
withtheoldvineswhichhavebeengrubbed.
2.Production trendssince1964/65
Wineproduction intheCommunity andineachoftheMember
Statessince1964/65isgivenintable1andiingraphs1and2.It
isontheincrease.Thistrendwasparticularly accentuated bythe
largeharvestin1973andbythe1974harvestwhiohwasalsoabove
theaverageoftheperiodconsidered .Aswasalreadypointedoutfor
thetwopreceding wine-growing years,wineproduction isincreasing

-7-
more quickly inGermany than inthethree other producer Member States .
But ifthevolume ofproduction inFrance andItaly istaken into conside­
ration ,itisobvious that themarked upward trend inthese twoMember
States constitutes awarning signal forfuture crises inthewine market .
Theyields from areas under vines listed intable 8also show an
upward tendency for alltheMember States *These trends seem toreflect
both technical progress inwine --growing ,particularly with regard tothe
selection ofplants andtherationalization ofcultivation processes •
.•andadifferent attitude onthepart ofproducers inassessing thefu­
ture market fortheir production .
Thegrowth inproduction (table j)should becompared with the
growth ininternal uses (table S)intheCommunity ,Graph 1wascompiled
onthebasis ofthese figures .Itemerges from this information that the
internal uses intheCommunity continue toincrease butwith amuch smal­
lergrowth than that ofproduction .Theaverage annual growth rate ofin­
ternal uses ,excluding exceptional distillations ,isonly0.23^",whereas
thatofproduction amounts tol.lj/^".TheCommunity harvest in1974although
considerably less than that oftheprevious year has notchanged this trand .
•/.
These figures arenowobtained onthebasis ofinternal uses excluding
exceptional distillation carried outsince 1970 * so-called "least
squares "statistical method isapplied .Amoro accurate annual average
growth value isthus obtained during agiven period .Calculated according
tothis method ,theaverage annual growth andproduction is0.96^forthe
1972/73wine-growing year and1.50$ forthe1973/74wine-growing year .
Calculated inthesame waytheaverage annual growth ininternal uses is
0.43 c/ofor1972/73and0*38 ?*for1973/74.

Ingraph 1,theline showing theproduction trends corsses theone
showing trends ininternal uses .This fact isagood reflection ofthe
surplus situation which hr.s existed ontheCommunity market since the
"beginning ofthe1973/74wine-growing year andvrtiich can .only beregarded
asthebeginning ofasituation ofstructural surpluses .
This impression scarcely changes ifCommunity ,imports andexports
aretaken into consideration ,since they are ,apart from exceptional years ,
both about the same size andhave only aslight influence onthegeneral
trends ofdevelopments inproduction anduses asawhole .
IV.GOIC ■UNITY EKD3AV0URS 'iX?IMPROVE TOSC PRODUCTION AND PROCESSING STRUCTURES
Steps taken byKenbsr States toimprove structures inthewine sec­
torinclude provision for subsidies forreplanting andforthe est ?,-
blishment orenlargement ofcollars .Replanting isnormally associated
with modernization ofavineyard ,particularly bytheplanting ofva­
rieties which provide good quality wines .InGermany ,replanting pro­
jects areoften combined with reparcelling andimprovements inroad­
works andwater supplies ..InItaly ,special attention ispaid tothe
substitution ofvines inspecialized cultivation forvines inmixed
cultivation .
Many ofthese structural improvement projects inthewine sector
have ".Teen thesubject ofapplications forinvestment aidfrom the
EAGGF tosupplement national endeavours .Table 10gives some informa­
tion ontheprojects submitted between 19^5 -74which have received
aidfrom theEAGGP .All theproducer Member States have received
Community subsidies toimprove their wine structures ,butinvarying
degrees .Tlrr.3Italy ,andabove allGermany ,have benefited from this
aid toaconsiderable extent inrelation totheir areas under vine .

-9-
Prance |after along period ofdirecting :itsapplications toother
agricultural sectors ,nowseems to "bepaying attention tothevalue which
these aidmeasures could have forthedevelopment ofproduction struc­
tures inthewine sector andFrench projects inthewine sector because
more numerous since 1973 *
V. THE KARXET SITUATION
1.Demand for wine inthe Community
Table 9describing the internal uses ofwines intheCommunity shovrs
that thedemand forwine continues toincrease .However ,some caution is
necessary ,since thequantities ofwine distilled inthecontext of
Community ornational intervention measures must bededucted from the
internal uses (graphs 1,3,4 5)»
Ifexceptional distillations aredisregarded ,internal uses inItaly
andFrance areindeed stagnant .This isinfact duetoastandstill in
the consumption ofwines inFranco andItaly .There arenoprecise sta­
tistics butunofficial information points ,inFrance especially ,toa
decrease intheconsumption oftable wines ,slightly compensated forby
anincrease inthat ofquality wines p.s.r .
Conversely ,intheother Member States ,consumption isincreasing
but itshould notbehoped that itwill compensate forthedecline ob­
served inFrance ,since thelevel ofconsumption inFrance andItaly is
incomparably higher than that oftheconsumption intheother Member
States .
Taken overall ,therefore ,arelative standstill inconsumption may
behoped for,unless fiscal harmonization measures covering allbevera­
gesmakes foranincrease intheconsumption ofwines intheMember
States with alowlevel ofconsumption .
Iftheinterval uses aretaken toinclude special distillations ,aslight
increase isobserved .However ,it"isdoubtful whether this increase can
infuture besuch astoabsorb theadvance inproduction .
•/

-10-
2.Dcve-opr:.ant ofprices an-1Community intervention measure s
Prices fortable wines atthefirst stage ofmarketing during the
1973/74marketing year showed adecrease which still continued atthe
beginning ofthis marketing year .Graph 6shows ,"bywayofexample ,the
development ofaverage Community producer prices fortable wines ofthe
RItype .Thereason forthis decrease istheextraordinarily large har­
vest of1973 )which also explains thevery large stocks atthebeginning
ofthecurrent marketing year which still weigh heavily onthemarkets
inalltheproducer Kembtr States .
Price trends fortable wines oftheRI,RIIandAItype arees­
pecially disturbing inItaly where thedecrease continued atthebegin­
ning of1975* Prance ,thesituation isnotmuch bettor .Theprices
fortable wines oftheAIIandRIIItype which setthetrend onthe
German market seem tohave been improving slowly since December 1974»but
they were still below theactivating price .Prices fortable wines of
theAIIItype aremore stable butfarfrom satisfactory .
This crisis onthe wine market has led the Council and the Commis­
sion tohave recourse tointervention measures provided for inRegula­
tion (EEC)NO816/70inorder toimprove themarket invane .Table11
sets outtheexpenditure oftheEAGGF inthewine sactor ,actually in­
curred orcommitted .Itshows that theconclusion ofstorage contracts
and the various distillation measures toease the market intable wines
involve touch greater financial aidbytheCommunity for1974 and1975
than fortheprevious years .50millions u.a .more arerequired from
the1975 budget tocover expenditure onthedistillation measures deci­
dedinApril1975*
Itiscertain that toofrequent and '.too intensive recourse to
distillation operations inthewine sector would deprive them ofthe
exceptional character which hadoriginally been intended .Moreover ,if
itistrue that thesurpluses areofastructural nature ,itshould be
realized that recourse todistillation maymitigate theeffects ofa
surplus situation butdoes noteffectively combat theroot cause ofthe
trouble .
•/•

-11-
Thedistillations decided in1975 »atatine ofmajor crisis ,occur
at price levels vary close totheactivating prices ,sometimes even above
themarket price .Inthese circumstances ,itcannot "besaid that they do
notassist thesale ofmediocre wines .And atthese price levels ,thedis­
tillation operations were noincentive fortheproducer toimprove thequa­
lity ofhiswines .
Moreover ,,stocks ofwine distillated arebecoming large andalready
represent more than thenormal quantities marketed during three oreven four
marketing years .Although there hasnotbeen ,strictly speaking ,anydis­
turbance ofthemarket inalcohol itmay "bestated that there has "been al­
ready adistinct disturbance ofthemarket inwine brandies .
Inthesector ofquality wines p.s.r .,price movements arevery
varied .Thequality nines p.s.r .which arewell established onthemarket
because oftheir undisputed quality andtheir reputation ,andwhich are
available inrather limited quantities ,are ,despite thestrained situation
onthemarket ,asintheprevious marketing year ,rather expensive .Incon­
trast ,thelittle known quality wines p.s.r .which arenotyetestablished <
onthemarket andthose which areavailable inlarge quantities because of
thelees stringent quality requirements arequoted atprices approaching
those oftable wines ,that istosayatprices which donotsatisfy the
producers .Certain quality requirements ofRegulation (ESC)No8I7/7O
should therefore bere-examined with aview toencouraging theMember
States tomake theconditions ofproduction forpart oftheir quality •
wines p.s.r .more stringent .Inthis way ,thequality level ofquality
wines p.s.r .andthat oftable wines would simultaneously beincreased ,
which would undoubtedly influence price formation attheproducer level .
Moreover ,theruinous competition will beended between quality wines p«s»r «
which meet thehigh quality standards andthose with theright tothesame
designation butwhich maybeoffered atvery lowprice because oftheenor­
mous yields ofgrapes requiring considerable enrichment .
le

-*12»
3.Trade
Verylittlenewstatistical dataontradehasreachedtheCommission
sincethepublication ofthereportforthe1973/74marketing year,which
waspublished on17September 1974»Reference can,therefore ,onlybemade
tothedatainthatreport.However,tables12-17,whichtosomeextent
supplement tables10-16ofthepreviousreport,areanannextothis
report.
(a)Intracornnnnit.y trade
Intracomnunity tradeforthe1973/74marketing yeari3setoutin
table12,whereastable10ofthepreviousreportreferredtocalendar
years.Although comparison betweenthesetwotablesisthussubjectto
reservations ,itshowsthatFrenchandItalianexportstootherMember
Statesareexpected todecreasein1974compared withtheprevious years.
ItshouldbenotedthatItalyprovided59$of"theCommunity'simports
fromotherliemberStatesduringthe1973/74marketingyear,whereasFrance
providedonly36$*Thisfactissurprising seeingthatFrenchandIta­
lianproductionsaremoreorlessthesanesize.Itisinteresting to
notethatFranceimportsincreasing quantities ofItalia?!wines,despite
itsconsiderable difficulty indisposing ofpartofitsovmproduction .
SomeItalianwines;are,infact,usedforcoupagowithFrenchvines
withalowalcoholcontent andthemoreFrenchv;inesthereareifitha
lowalcoholcontentthegreaterwillbethedemandforsuchItalian
wines.
•Inaddition,thepriceofItalianwinesisgenerally lowerthanthat
ofFrenchwines,eveniftransport costistakenintoconsiderrtion .
--TheFrenchmarkethas,therefore ,becomeattractive forItalianwines
andthetradefromwhichdeveloped andincreased atthebeginning of
1975ledtothedistillation measures ofApril1975&n&tothestoxtage
measuresfor1500000hiofwineintroduced intoFrance.
•/.

-13-
b)Imports from non-member countries
Table 13onimports oftheCommunity ofNine replaces table 11ofthe
report fs>rthe1973/74marketing year which only covered theCommunity of
Six.This table brings outthat Community imports from non-member countries ,
after having decreased considerably in197^»arenowmaking acome-back .
In1973 they reached 75%oftheir level for1970 *Spain ,Portugal ,YJugos-
lavia andMorocco feature notably amongst thesupplier countries .
Imports from theMa^reb took aleap forward in1973 »which istobe
explained bythehi^i prices operating intheCommunity in1973 (seegraph 6).
This increase inimports wasstimulated when theprices operating intheCom­
munity became higher than thereference price .Itcontinued during thefourth
quarter of1973 »despite thefact that Community prices hadreturned tobelow '
thereference price (seetable 19).During theautumn of1973 these imports 1
were added tothevery abundant supplies which were then available due to
anexceptional harvest ,andtherefore greatly contributed toweakening the
Community market .
Thedivision oftotal imports oftheCommunity ofNine between intra -
andextras community imports isgiven inthelast three lines oftable 13.
Itshows that theintracommunity share oftotal imports ofthenine Member
States passed ,in1973 ,to6lfcafter haying been 84$in1972 and75$in1971 *
Acomparison between theCommunity 'simports bytype ofwine in1973 and
in1972 (tables 14and15)shows that itwastheimports ofwine ofanactual
alcooholic strength exceeding 13° ,anddelivered inbulk which increased
above allbecause ofmassive imports byPrance .

-14-
Asimilar tendency should benoted for bull ;imports ofxdnes of "between
13and15°andforwines without designation ofbetween 15and 18°and
those ofbetween 18and22° .Imports ofliqueur wine such asport or
sherry ontheother hand ,tend todecline .Thedecline inimports of
wine fortified fordistillation isconsiderable ;itcanbeexplained
bytheattitude ofGerman distillers whoprefer tobuywine phlegma
(Rohbrand )instead ofdistillation wine forthemanufacture ofquality
wine-brandy ("Weinbrand ").
c)Exports tonon-member countries
Anidea ofthetrend ofCommunity exports tonon-member countries
between 1972 and1973 isgiven bytables 16and17.Prom them itcan
beseen that thefavourable trend which hadalready been observed in
thelast report continued ,but ataslower rate .Thequantity ofwines
exported in1973 increased by15,Sfocompared with 1972 (the1972 in­
crease compared \;ith197^was29.6£).AlltheKember States contributed
towards this increase ,Germany (+29«4 /=)toamuch greater extent than
Prance (16.3^)andItaly (+8.9/^)-Exports ofdistillation wine from
theNetherlands ,Italy andPrance areworthy ofspecial attention .
VI.CONCLUSIONS
A.First series ofconclusions
1.Asintheprevious marketing year ,only aslight increase inthe
area under vines intheCommunity canbeexpected forthe1974/75
marketing year ,that istosc.y0,6$ofthearea under vines in
1973/74*Theincrease inthePrenoh area under vines isslightly
less than that oftheareas intheother llember States .Theregional
differences within theproducer Member States inthedevelopment of
thearea under vines arevery perceptible .
■/•

-15-
2.Thearea producing "table wines in "theCommunity hasdecreased slightly ,
vjhereas thearea producing quality wines p.s.r .hasincreased .Thetrend
anditsmagnitude arethesame asduring theprevious marketing year .
Thoarea producing quality wine p.s.r .hasincreased everywhere except
inafewFrench regions ;this increase reached substantial proportion
inthefollowing regions :Baden ,Aquitaine ,Champagne ,Languedoc ,
Provence-C3te d'Azur ,Piedmont ,Tuscany andApulia .ForBaden and
Campagne ,itwasthecontinuation ofatrend already reported inthe
last report .Thearea producing table wines increased greatly inApulia
andSicily ;itdecreased considerably inMidi-Pyrene esandAquitaine .
3.Production istending upward forthewhole oftheCommunity ,asduring
theprevious marketing year .Following theincrease andrenewal ofthe
area voider vines anincrease inannual production of2.9% isexpected
forquality wine p.s.r .and0,9% fortable wines .Thefuture increase in
thequantities ofquality wine p.s.r .available inItaly ismuch greater
than that fortheother Member States (+6.7% )*
4.Thecontinuing growth intheavailability ofquality wines p.s.r .isouch
astoprejudice theformation offair prices forthese vrines .TheCommis­
sion hasalready expressed doubts astowhether thequality requirements
forcertain quality wines p.s.r .arereally such astosteer production
intheright direction .TheCommission reiterates itsdisquiet .Exports
should beincreased inthevineyard andthecellar tomaintain anaccep­
table quality level andproduction aimed athigh yields perhectare should
berejected .Thestability ofthemarket inquality wines p.s.r .oanonly
maintained inthelong runifthequality requirements ofquality wines
p.s.r .,which do :iotsecure remunerative prices ,aremade more stringend .
This istrue particularly inrespect ofalcoholic strengths andyields
perhectare .TheCommission has tosome extent taken this need into
account inaproposal totheCouncil toamend Regulation (i2EC)No8lf/j0,
/.

-16-
5.Atthetime ofcompletion ofthis report price trends fortable wines at
thefirst stage ofmarketing were netsatisfactory intheCommunity .
Large-scale intervention measures proved necessary .Theconvergent trend
ofproduction andoftheinternal uses ofwine diminished thehope of
re-establishing thebalance ofthemarket bymeans ofCommunity inter­
vention measures .The :-market inwine intheCommunity already seems to
besuffering from structural surpluses . , -
6.Some ofthetable wines offered inthemajor production regions donot
atallcorrespond torequirements ofbuyers andtheir quality level is
inadequate .Itwould hot ,therefore ,beatalljustified tooffset dis­
posal problems forthese wines bymeans ofCommunity distillation opera­
tions .
Community intervention measures trust ,first ofall ,besuch asnot
togive encouragement totheproduction oflarge quantities ofwine of
mediocre quality .Secondly ,production must besteered sofar aspossible
tocorrespond with thedemand .
B.Second sériés ofconclusions
;Thesituation requires measures pftwosorts ,onequalitative andone
.quantitative .
.1.Asregards quality ,inorder toreduce theunsuitability ofpart ofthe
production ,endeavours ,should bemade tocease encouraging theproduc­
tion ofwines with alowalcoholic content ,disposal ofwhich isuncer­
tain .Inorder todothis itshould beenough toraise certain quality
characteristics such as s
-theminimum natural alcoholic strength and
-theactual alcoholic strength oftable wine .

-17-
2.Astoquantity ,inview ofthegradual appearance ofastate ofstructu­
ralsurplus ,andincrease inthearea under vines should nolonger he
allowed andreplantings should hesubject tostrict rules varying if
necessary according toregions andaimed exclusively atimproving quality .
Thesystem ofaidtoreplantings should therefore bemodified .
3.Lastly ,certain intervention measures could include both quantitative
andqualitative elements .Inorder todiscourage theproduction ofwines
ofinadequate quality duetoexcessive yields inrelation tothepoten­
tial oftheland ,distillation operations ,when they areabsolutely ne­
cessary ,should bedirected atthewines obtained beyond acertain yield
perhectare andprovision should bemade fortruly dissuasive withdrawal
prices for these products .
4.None ofthese measures mayinitself beenough .toimprove thesituation ,
especially inthevery short tern ,but itmaybehoped that incombina­
tion they will besufficiently effective inthemore orless long term .
Ifthis were not so,another series ofmeasures would have tobeenvi­
saged which would include thegrubbing ofcertain vines .Itmust beho­
pedthat itwill notbenecessary toresort tothis extreme solution .
5.Inanycase ,itnaybehoped that thedata contained inthis report
will besuch asnotonly toassist discussion ontheproblems ofthe
wine sector which theCouncil hasagreed tocomplete before 1August 1975 1
butalso theadoption ofthereasonable andadequate /SSftJBiJf 8bythemar­
ketsituation andwhich will give newhope totheCommunity wine produ­
cer .

Table1:Newplantings ,repl&ntings andgrubbings ofwinegre,pedplannedforthe1974/75
wine-growing yearcomparedwithforecasts forprevious wine-growingyears
T" .r
I I
j2::istmg areaun&erviLe *i..
New
plantings
ha.Replantings j
•i
.i
aa |
I
Ii
i
]Grubbings
ha.j–
jChants
I
I
iinproduc­
tion
|ha
I ■'''notyetm
production
hail ■ ■
|
haas7ofthe
existing area
intheprevious
year
Goriany
Ï97ÏT72
1972/73
1973/74
1574/75r
75.514
78.000
.80.60016.550
16.000
15.000-y-–– –
(1.118
776
!2.367
i6723.685
4.510
2.533
_.3.8Λ3. !
2,583 j3.815J1
+2.367
+700j
+2,5 i
+0,7
France
Ï97Ï/72
1972/73
1973/74
1974/751-193.000 !
1.185.000
1.196.000
1.196.00074.000
81.000
07.00018.500
11.900
13.490
10.423I r :
35.000
19.370
'18.5A5
26.30827.620
31.123I 1j
I
■- j
+4.415
+5.613+0,3 jt....P.i.4 I
JJ&tø(1)
1971/72
1972/73
1973/74
1974/75!1.070.000
j1.083,000
;1.091.00059.000
61.000
61.0005.097
5.660
6.206
10,808I
13.792
17.731
17.257
l'6.8?9I ' T
16.827
19.471 _r ]
+6.636
+8.166+0,6
+0,4
1+0,7Luxembourg
1971/72
1972/73
1973/74
1214/75■ I
1.133
1.102
1.06285'
124
1665
8
10
I5__39
■41
36.
"3941_45+ 5
+3_J
SEC(2)
1971/72
1972/73
1973/74
WâL7J__.2.339.652
2.347.107 >
2.368.667149.636
158.124
166.16824.720
10.344
22.073
21,923;52.516 .
41.652
;38.421
!A7.C19
•1•',,1■47.071_l
•...r»/i_j *_1_J1+13.423 !
i+14.488 1
l-L'~*«+0,5
+0,6
U\
■ ^JitLU 1. ,1 ,'I^'7*2 -rr-r-ih
(Source:EUR0STAT-Commission oftheEC-DaforAgriculture onthebasisofdataprovided bytheMemberStates
"Pura"area,"mistaprevalente "and"secondaria "changedinto"culturapura".
2Including Belgium.

Table2Breakdown ofnewplantings andreplantings ofwinegrapesaccording to:
whethertheyproducequality ,wipespfs.r«-ftable,vinesor'.riussitt^ndad
fordistillation .
Newplantings|Replantings Gru.bbin.gs !-Changes
ha ha ha' !
: !ihaJ
(a)Tablewins»I
1972/73 4 I 2!
1973/74 I
1974/75 I
(t))Quality winep.s.rJ
1972/73 772 4.508
1973/74 I2.367 2.583 2.583 +2.367
1974/75 ''612
: 1•3.843 '" '3.815 '+700J
France 1
7a.;Tablewine!
I
1972/73 5.000 11.8701 I
I1973/74 3.300 10.495 !17.025 -3.230
1974/75 340 15.078I20,161 . Iί-4.743
(b;Qu:uit/winep.o.r.1
1972/73 5.600 5.500I
1973/74 8.690 I5.950 8.815 !+5.8?-5
1974/75 4.318 10.225 8.9-2 +5.561
(c)Cogn .:.3,etc.
I
1972/73 1.300 2.000
1973/74 1.500 2.i00 '1.780 +1.820
11314/21 5.770 I1.OC5 1-980 j!+4.725 'I
1 ■. 1r : 1
I iI
I !
(a)Tablewine
1972/73 2.737 9.8581
1 1
1973/74 i2.734 9.S'6 12.162 il+558
1974/75 7.514 12.146 I16.834 I+2.826
ibyQuality winep.s.iv I '!
1972/73 2.923 I7.843 . II
1973/74 3.472 7.?71 I4.665 1I+60O78
1974/15 3.2£4__ !I4.-'3 L^637 I+5.?/o
Luxembourg<––
II .-
valL'ab^e wineI
1972/73 1 3 - '
1973/74 2 2 +4
1974/75 A Jr4
(b)Quality winep.s.r.!
É I
1972/73 7 35I
1I.
I
1973/74 8 34 41 +1
1974/75 Î5 35 L___45 i-5
Ττ.-!,η.η.I vo t– r■- ■.......
7a)lablewinei
1I
Iι
1
1972/73 7.742 21.7*3I
i "" I
1973/74 6.036 20,.'^ 29.137 -2.668
..1974/75 7.354 !27.226 36.995 ~1.913
^b)Quality winep.s.r.1
I
1972/73 9.302 !17.889 i
1973/74 14.537 15.8>,8 16.104 i+14.271
■.1974/75':"•'8.299'18.785 " Γ"15.479 '"+11.606
(c)Cognac.etc."I
ι
1972/73 1.300 '2.000l
1973/74 1.500 !2.100 11,780 t+1.820
L_J2Z4/I§_ 5.770 11.005 '+4.795
Soiirce:Commission oftheEC–DGfor
theMemberStates.Agriculture onthe"basisofdaxaprovided by
Ν

Table3:Provisional planfornewplantings ,replantings andgrubbingsforthe1574/75
T-rine~groviir:g yearsetoutaccording toregioninhectares .
'Τ ΊΓ
IINewplantings Replantings Grubbings Changes
» !TableQuality Table jQuality TauleQualityΓTable■ IliaiQualit ;-
■wine IwinetSsr wine winepsrwine 1wirepsrwine Ivaner-
Germany !^ 11
;_heinland-?falz I 45 2.17512.220
''.oblenz 5 210 215
"'rier /*
IVI10 505 i 515f-I
•:r:1vri.irttc:.'ib^i'g1 157 292 367 -I+L
"ordoaden 1 28 -I
1126 126 +r1
C
..;Udbaclen 387 258 258I-I+3f
V;armstadt 15 175 t12 +Ί
•i.
Jnterfraxiîcen 23 100 100 +
Saarland 2 2! L_2L-I+
Total 672 !T
~_13.843Ί 3.815 +7'J
.'rance i
1entre 160 130 270 555 !455μ425 2i
aysdelaLoirqI 275 90 540 930 860μ840 ù
,oitou-Charented 30 50 240I100I-190r ■
Aquitaine 690 2.010 3.070 3.070 3.020Γ­Ι.060+7-
•ridi-Pyrénées 50 1.590 1702.840 70h1.250 ι+1S
\;nampagne 700 210 i 350_1
t+561
Alsace 350 220 15 305 15I+25;
anelie~Comto 20 70 15 70 !32r50+E,j,
bourgogne 510 135 275 190 440h55+
r.uvergne 10 35 120 I.40h110
ïiione-Alpes 1 760 520 .340 690 620 170+4tf
Languedoc i320 200 7.450 3.300 18.210 1.280 440+2.2':f
rrovence~C .Azur 420 2.993 I.64O 3.100 1.270 110+V:
uorse I50 100 120 I120 120 20+ HJ-
vAvh©r3 1
L -53L2011
I208
Total 340 4.318 15.07S .10.225-20.161 8.9824.743 +5.5-
I
ί83T
II
i i1
1
696η
'ieraontii 54 350 7211.100 300 +50'.
i'olL'Aosta si"" 2 +2
;'Ombardia 1i112 40 13ô 78 296 3048+8
.(.cantino A.Adige 9 16 37 97 80 26 34+ .8;
veneto 202 i135 377 426 599 260ι20+30
FTiuliV.Giulia 149 107 86 124 148 60;+87+171
.vicariaI20 7 147 40 I80 15i13+3^
;ai.LiaP.cmagna !3--6 219 662 358 874 216+104+36;
roscana I6C0 816 150 298 I1.210 210I46O+■90:
Uxoria 68 74 153 67,211 281+10+11
barene !48 52 !485 415 837 113 304+35
..iiZlO 54 41 325 147 331 1101+..48+-7-
V/oruzao i69 30 246 150 426 120 111+
;liso i135 I70 593 102 655 45+73-r12
-mpania 321 130 115 62 349 54+87+13;
'-iglia 2.425 975 3.400 4603.680 I310+2.145 +1.12":
^Silicate 3 1 340 60 250 50+93+*>1.
.Jabria !30 13 234I46 290 I40 2o+ x'.
'•icilia p'-1,0£«.•-•J 400 3.468 4124.430 380+1.8271+4-
Sardegna L..no._ 85 940 620 988 I270!+621±_
•'!:otal :7.>.-r3.294 :12.140 ί4.683 1067834 :2.637 i+2.826L+5■-3'.
r;yce:Commission oftheEC~EGforAgriculture onthebasisofdateprovided bythe
MemberStates.
;<•)includitig areasundervineforSüdwttrttemberg

Table*:Development oftheareaurdepwine-grapevinesIntheCoraunltvsince1967/58
Inha
κ, 1«7/I9fi8|1X8/39
Il
I1969/701S70/7Î 1371/721972/73 !11£73/7*
.
&>rn.¥iy
ijtai
.Inprodjctlai
.notyatInprodictionI
63.7G3|
69.460 j
14.30084.«2
70.2H
14.2288?.422
71.335
14.08588.587
73.?3
14.83792.064
7ri»S14
16.55094.aD
78.000
16-000(65,6^
mji
:Jelglue
!uital
.Inprediction
.notyetInprodiction0
0
0j'4
! *
04
4
05
5
0e
5
î 0*1i
5
%
France
total
.Inproduction
•notyethipredictionr i
1.324.000 j
1.237.030 |
87.000 |1.314.000
1.232.000
82.0001.280.030
1.20UCC0
75.001,201.000
1.2(X3o000
72.0001.267.000
1.193.0C9
74.0QD1,256.000
1.165.0.C
81.0001.28W
1.1&i,u
ίΤ.Ο^
1»
fWgc'
total •
.!.iproduction '
!•notyetInproduction:!
1.54F..OOO j
1.517.000 I
.28.000i.ravso
1.497.300
33.0U01.441,000
1.4CG.OOO
35.0001.110.000
995.000
115.0001.129.000
1.070.000
r9.C001.144.000
1.G83.Q00
61.0001.15?e^:
I.Oïi.J,
M-:-.
:lo*HjCtfrç
.Inproduction
•notyetInproduction1.222
1.157
c51.227
1,164
33i
1.223
1.153
701J04
1.136
681,218
1.133
851.226
1.1C2
1241.U/
vr--
to'dl
•Inproduction
•notyet»nproduction0
0
0!
0
0
'0|I 0
1 0
I00
0i
0II
0
0Io!o
0
c!r
S
C*
?
P;R6'•
ίο£ϊ
-Inprodictloi
-notyetInproductionIJ.Q33.982
|2.Si4,627
129.3K
i2«529.673
''.800,382
12S.291
L_: i2.007.643
2.683.493
124.156
l!
2.400.796
2.278„84|
20I.9552.489.238
2,339.552
14^6382.505.231 |
2.347.107
158.124 l2.5?V°'*">
2.3W.6.;
(lA?ai'-v'■
[MtedKfrvadca ; |
total | ]
•Inprxjbetla » j • J
•notyetInproductIan j
Jr
i
i!3
ι
«1
3
:, Ί
0 !
0!
I0i0i0
oI
I
Ie
r
ν.
I C
I
i
fnmmiw
♦otaf
-wprodietloa
•notyetInproductiraS
0
0
00
0
0i
0
o
0
i0
0
05?
c
c
"maartc
bia'l-
•kiprodbctlar
notyetInproduct!®I
' l0
O
00
u
00
0
00
G
0a
o
3
fi'Rg2
iaUl
•Inprediction
-notyetInprediction
(– 1–" ■!"■'1
i
(3)2.807.659 j'3)2,480.796
(3*2.683.493 j{3)2.27&.34|
(3)124.1F6f3)201.6552.48S.288
2.339.552
149.0361
I
2.505,231 !
2o347.107j
158,124 i?.5χε:Ί
166.1^
«wi-fîe:tostat
jtaty!untilthe196S//wlnagrowingyear,t<*IngIntcaccounttheconversioncoefficientof42601forvinesInnixedcu!tl**t!«n
j't®l*!*"■*10h95'*froBV*1970/71«lnegrowingyear,followingtheestabHshsenioftheItallenvlt{culturalJwdregister
uceptfortheUnitedKingdomforwtilchthislte«Isprobablynegligible

A'.':5.■w repiaating :.and.^vaboiiuj,^ofopen-air _vixxic-^rji :.rvinesp.Ujhwifor.
the197s/75winegrowingyearand.areaundervinesin73/74and72/73
{Existingareaundervines(ha)Plantings/tReplanting Grut'binrs "Changes
linproduction jlotvetm
production
France !
:1972/73'
{1973/74
p-974/75(estimated )40o798
40.053
EL972/73
p.973/74 !
P-974/75(estimatod )j__|tmmi .__r_^^ T-~
40.798 1.734
40o053 '1.372 - 770 720 +50
id) - ;820 340 -20
I
64.000 4-000
63.920 4.142 91 864 223 +732
id) • 90 1230 1212 +108
Γ*
«
I
Î10A.798 5.734
5·:·14 91 !-1634 ·■943 I,+782
|90 j2050 2052 j+8811972/73 ΙΐΟΛ.798
1973/74 -103.973
;1974/75(estimated )
Sources ;Eurostat
Commission oftheECDGforAgriculture onthebasisofdataprovided bytheMemberStates ,

Table6,+.i\.ctofnev/plsntingr treplantingsandgrubtings plannedin101y75onfutureproduction
MemberState
TypeofwineProduction m
1974/75(1)(2)
hlFutureannualproduction expected Foreseeable decrease
inannualproduction
asaresultofgrub-
bings1974/751,3
hlForeseeable chancein
Iannnn.l irrorilir.+in>i
IIIewplantings
1974/75
I
hlReplanting ^
191A/15'
hl!hl3
tin$ofpro­
ductionin197^/7!!
Germany
Tablewine
Quality winepar544.000
6.261.000
49.4i7.OOO
14.404.000
11.661,000 11
I
!
.57.230 '
340 !
4*218
.„__5'139 !1
j
357.511 .. 267.000j
+147,741 !±2*4
France
Tablewine
Quality winepsr
OtherwinesI
1.050.000
.510,000
85.000906.000
355-000
99.000+144.340
+159.218
8.P30I
+0,3
!+1,1
-0,1
Italy...■a.Tablewine
Qualitywinepsr
Otherwines ^
Luxembourg
Tablewine
Quality winepsr63.782.000
7.356.000
3./50.OC0 :555.150
238.450
..notavailable
1.200861,380
343.300
notjivailab1e
430
2.800555,800
69.850 j
notavailable+860.730
+491-900+1,3
+6,7
»«fllllf-«.^B«»
69.000
69.000! !
I2.468
1,9701.988
+2.030-2,9
L+-~£»2__
EX*
Tablewine -
Qualitywineper
Otherwines ___113.817.000 (4)
26.090.000
i3.Hl.OOO555.490
301.098
notavailable1.911.860
1.213,611
notavailableI :
jI./64.268 j
713.820 !
ii'iotavailjOole+1.003.08 ?
+8OO.889
notavailan]I+0S9
!+2,9
Le-,1
Source:Wine.estimate1974/75
2 •including thequantities ofmustsintendedfortheproduction ofgrapejuice
3SourcesCommission oftheEC-DGforAgriculture onthebasisofdataprovidedbytheMemberStates
^includingBelgium

Table7iDevelopment inwineproduction intheCommunitysince1964/65v1(in1000hi)
liemberStates1964/651965/661966/67S1967/6811968/69!
s1969/70!1970/711971/72i1972/73r1973/74
» '
1 rôtal!1974/75(estimTT"
1
I i ofwh.ich
i
I 'iIiITable jQualityOther I
iJ!
: Il
Iwine w.n.s.rwines
FKGermany 1771651~T2Ô0l* 1~5.235]6.30016.289]6.146 ;10.1101I6.356 |
[I7.933 j10.7516.799!5386.261 0
IFrance 60.767 I66.707
i 161.16661.07265.445 j,49.83174.470 I61.816
;59.049 ii82.987 i!75.082 :4901714.404 l11.661
Italy :66.945 68.20664.70674.725 j,65.32371.65868.87064.212 '60.174 i76.716 I74.288 I63432 ΐ
ι ι7.356 !i3.450
i
INetherlands 6!..10!9)i11i .1010jI12I12!; '21
I0 00 0'0
IBelgium 3 3 4 5 13 10 10!'10;■■5 5I.'5ιI5 ■·,ο·!0!
ILuxembourg |163 I112 129 i ■123!
,!116
L122 ;242i104|140!■186
( !|138L691S.69 .
I !.■I-°l
EUR6 135.069 140.238 131.24-9142.236'137.196
ί127-777153.7141132.5101127.303 {170.645 ]
i : J[156*312|113111 ii28.090 115.111!
UnitedKingdom
IrelandΓ
I«•
1•
ί0■s
0Soi1!
0!·1!
i°iI0
I0!0
I00
I0I,O
i0
Denmark I
>!
II
Ii0L:^° i■-°!
J -0!
j!'■0!
[ i!0!0
i I0!__^J
KUR91-–
t
1i
1*
ί
!!M,,■1I«■■■■
i
♦
!
î
* 11!127.777
2)
Lmmiwmm] ! j
!153.714i132.511
I2)!!
127.304 j
.••i! !
[170.646 {156*312 (113111
• •i ii
j18.090
f
!,-;15.111ί
? >
1,m' I
(ljProduction intendedexclusively forwinemakingandnotincludingquantities ofmustsintendedfortheproduction ofgrape
juice*
(2)WithouttheUnitedKingdopforwhichproduction istoberegardedaspractically nil.
Source:Until1973/74:EUH0STAT
1974/751Commission oftheEC-DGforAgriculture ,wineestimate.
#

TabjQ.-o:Development ofyielusoftheareaplantsdwithwinegrapesintheCommunitysinceI964/65inhiperhaofwine-
grapevinesinproduction
r –––tinr'i'Hf
MemberStates1964/65 !1965/661966/671967/68 j1968/691969/701970/711971/72I1972/73
i1973/74
PRGermany 104,7 j75,5 175,7 90,7 189,7 86,3 137,3–!
84,2 ;!102.4 132,8
feelgiun :. ■« 1: |: : : I:
France 48,5 53,8 49,3 49,5 53,3 41,5 61,7 51,9 49,9 69,4
Italy 42,5(1)43,8(1)!I42.2(1)49,3(1)43,8 51,2 69,5(2 60.3 55,9 70,6
1
(Luxembourg 141,6 97,0 111,4 106,3 100,5 105,8 213,0 91,8 127,0 175,1
NetherlandsI: II•
I■ I:
!■I
:
EUR-6 II46,6 49,0 46,2 50,A I49,2 I47,3 67,7(2)56,8 I54,4 I72,2
UnitedKingdom ! I
I 1( I
, !
I!
I'.
* 0 i0 !!0
Ireland !I
I' It
I1
i0 0 0 I0 0
fcenmark 1|
iI |
i\
ii 1
t !0I0 iο ί!0 i0
ta-9 I .!
!! I
I iI !
> 147,867,7(2);
I56,8
■54,4 ji72,2
i
t
Source:ËUROSTAT
(1)Calculated according "tothe"production intendedforwinemaking",
(2)Changeofbasisfromtheipfo/flmarketingyearfollowingthesettingupoftheItalienviticultural land
register

Table9.iDors'elopment ofillternal uses ofwine since 1968/69(in1000hi)
1968/691969/701970/711971/721972/731973/74
['^ί.ΟΡΓΏοην
Total indige v.uao ,ofwhich
-direct human consumption
~processing
-ofwhich distillery11.173
9.620
1.553
1-45911.656
9.792
I.864
I.64612.286
10.650
1.636
1.51213.441
11.965
1.476
1.36614.623
13.388
1.235
1.11413.448
12.363
I.O85
953
113.75 -
12.71e
1.04 .:
9CC
Franc q
Total indige .use ofwhich
-direct human consumption
~processing
«=ofwhich distillery66.788
56.126
9.844
9.627
161.922
54.582
6.493
6.21366.833
54.820
11.281
11.02166.763
55.211
10.763
IO.48865.934
1)55.834
9.371
9.087I
73.797 176.100
54.475 !53.700
18,642 ;21.500
18.342 120.700
Total indxge .U3e ,ofwhich
-dirocc human consumption
-processmg
oofwhich distillery64.352
59.048
2.492
1.89263.804
59.547
3.082
2.58266.346
59.596
5.750
5.30057.515
55.305
1.750
I.40057"013
55.099
1.474
I1.124!
56.164 !66.06 ")
52.279 55.865
3.450 !9.750
3.100 j7.300
INetherlands j
jTotal indige .use ,ofwhich
|-direct human consumption ;
•-processing
=ofwhich distillery674
664
0
0700
690
0
.■0 !
L762
752
0
0867
853
0
01.187
1.175
0
01.213
1.200
0 j
0 !1.259
1.247
0
c
!Belgium
;Total indigo ,use ,ofwhich
I-direct human consumption
j-processing
I=ofwhich distillery1.022
l.olO
2
01.167
1.155
2
0'- –.1*1
1.288
1.262
14
121.286
1.275
1
0- ν
1.417
1.401
2
0r-1"-"' – :
i
1.343
1.329
2
01.550
1.39c
144
0
:Total indige .use ,ofwhich
j-direot human consumption
j-processing
I =»ofwhich distillery
k -- ■^– -118
111
0+
01
127
125
0+
0142
139
0-:
0144
142
0+
0142
139
1
0!
174
171
1
0136
133
-1
J.
0
:EUR 6
;Total mdig .use ,ofwhich
j-direct human consumption
-processing
=ofwhich distillery144.127
126.579
13.891
12.973139.376
125.891
II.44I
10.44-I147.657
127.219
18.681
17.845I4O.OI6
124.751
13.990
13.2541"Λ,νΐ6
127.036
12.033
11.325146.139
121.817
23.180
22.395
J150.868
125.053
32.435
28,900

Table9(contd.)
I|1968/69
1I1969/70
11970/711971/721972/731973/7I1?
EUR6
Totalindige.use.ofwhich144.127 139.376 147.657 I4O.OI6 i140.316 146.139lr>
-directhumanconsumption 126.579 125.891 127.219 124.(751 127.036 121.817l;
-processing 13.391 11.441 18.681 13.990 12.083 23.180
=ofwhichdistillery I12.97S 10.441 I17.845 I13.254 11.325
122.3951r
I^
UnitedKingdom
11
IITotalindige.use,ofwhich 1.479 1.700 2.142 2.837 2.257
~directhumanconsumption 1.479 1.700 2.142 2.8370Oc.7
~processmg 0 0 c
«cfwhichdistillery 0 0 C
Ireland ΓΊ
Totalindigo,use.ofwhich 48 52 52 65 671
l-directhumanconsumption 45 52 51 65 67
-processing1
I0 0 0 0 0
<=ofwhichdistillery 0 0!
101 0
Eenmark–'
I
j Γ
Totalindige,use,ofwhich 240 267 295 483488
-directhumanconsumption 240 267 295 483483
-processing ! 0• 0 0 0 0
=ofwhichdistillery 0 0°°\
EUR9 I Γ^^
1 Γ
Totalmclige.use,ofv;hich 141.143 149.676 142.505 143.701 145.951 1:
–directhumanconsumption 127.655 129.238 127.239 130,421 124.629i:.
-processing i 12)li.4412)18.681 13.990 I12.083 23.I0O
<=ofwhichdistillery 12)IO.44I !12)17.345 j13.254 |11.32522.395jC-
Source:Prom1968/69to1973/74fEUROSTAT-wine--growing year1974/75Commission oftho
EC-DC-forAgriculture -wineestimate
L)including "concentrated musts' 1
l)withouttheUnitedKingdomforwhichthisitemisprobablynegligible
ff.B.:Forthewine-growing yearsbelow,thefiguresfor"totalindigenous use"and!,ofv;h!
distillery "includeexceptional distillations asfollows :
Iwine-growing years Prance Italy Gernany EUR6
1970/71 |
1971/72 j1973/74
1974/75(prw.)500.000hl
3.000.000 hl
2.895.000 hl
9.281.000 hlI2.900.000hl
500,000hl
3.122.000 hl
5.050.000hl11.000hl3.400.000 hl
3.500.000 hl
6.017.000 hl
14.342.000 hl«

Table20:2ACGFaidforprojectsaimedatimprovingstructures in.thewinesector
A-pW' :'• «'P't-r's3 . '... ... *lux*.u-i..~,r--*»v• *.
Y-JOT MemberState ïïumberofprojects
finanoed .■.Areareplanted
' (ha).IM– 1Iurn.P««in >«tmm*<,.JJ
1965-lm _J
^~Ι'οΐΧϋΟύ&.ΐί£3ϊ1Ε ]
I':·1\-'|Gsi-:r<.?ny :
|Lu~enbourg
-italy
E2C19
3
•'12
: .138
:172 :.11.821.60.00
130.00.00
11.257*00:00 •
:-69»9?7o^0*r "
r93.(4^*'(2.0020.643«471
';-6-w.uoo
•<3 -.vi
_-.7.-,.y/< I^,*3 I
B.FRO«T3C'?3»r-^-r.T'-rrrrn0*0^r.'rp\t-t-rcirrnyr o?ctilars •
ïe&r îlemberSûace Nur.berofprojects
financed :Storagecapacity
created(hi)I'Aid >-=d.J.ks^
– : >,
1966-1/:'<>'; !
(1974fxrtsvpart) inù7M«-r;v
Luxembourg
France
Tn-:-33
23''
133
189 '1.483.805
687.607
5.837*543 :
8.008,9559*37ο.-ν>ί;ϋ
O'-*." •"
C'i<-«A~-j»/-J .
Cl'v,;-,o

2'akleJ-i .•EAGGF(GuaranteeSection)expenditure inthewinesectoraccordingtotypeofexpenditure andye£
, Community inU.J1
Typeofexpenditure
690(refunds
(monetary amounts
691Intervention measures
6910(privatestorageaid
(rehousing ,transportaid
6911Otherintervention measures
(distillation ofwines)
692Otherexpenditure
6920Compulsory distillation of
by-products
TOTALExpenditure
1&:iu11971
71.452
23.737.109
19.510.050
52.762
4.174.277
4.442.249
4.442.2491972
407.565
55.441.078
28.214.425
1.398.487
.25<.-328»166
1.065«557
1.065.5571973
267.518
148.176nayear
inU.A.
.Bulget
1974
3.800.000
8.703.297 |65.300.000
6.594.359 37.300.000
2.108.938 28.000.000
I
2,641.511 1.000,000
2.641.5111.000.000
r
I28.250.810 j56.914.200 I11.760.502 j70.100,0001975
1.000.000
94.900.000
52.400.000
42.500.000
3.300.000
3.300.000
99.200.0001

:Intracommunity tradeinwineonthebasisofimportseffectedduringthe1973/74marketingvearHeading22.05BrusselsNomenclature svrineoffreshgrapes
exporter liember
States
France
E.L.E.U ;
Netherlands
FRGermany
Itily
UnitedKingdom
Ireland
Denmark
EUR9France
5.958
214
5.050
3.042*247
33
0
0
hlB.053.502
30.8B«L*E»Uê
833.259
2.631
42.786
113.276
143
0
0
I992.145
I
j10,0Ttembor G"t3,*fcoo
^wtlicri;.2ids jPRGermany
208.453
59.158
34.950
147.661
11.237
0
56
461.515
4,7IÔO8.526
328
26.711
2.254.664
11
0
6
3.590.246
36.3
E2H2®iCommunications fromtheimporter MemberStatesItaly
363.979
5.299
1
5.276
0
0
0IUni
kingdom
374.555
3,0761.434
3.C80
4.333
191.601
271.351
2.823
747
235.3^9
12.5Ireland
23.821
0
0
4.865
5.473
2.181
30
36.370
0,41.
BenmarkEJ39
hl
98.935
472
0
31.565
14.568
12
03.593.407 !
74.295
33.940 i
316.093 ,
5.849.240
13.617
•2.823
839
145.552
1,59.889.254
100,0

fable13:EUR9
Development ofimportsofvanefromnon-member countries (outside EUR9)
according tomaincountries oforigineffected duringthecalendar years
1971to1973.
Headii]g22.05 Brussels Nomenclature :wineoffreshgrapes Unit:hi
-Importseffected inτ
1970indices =IOC
Countryoforigin •{1
i
1971 1972 1973 197119721973 !
Sv;itzerlr.net I5.157 I;6.190]10.050 107129209 1
Austria 208.379 I265.136 !231.6211 119151132 :
Portugal 611.482 643.064 795.101 104109135
Spam 1.511.543 ι1.605.214 2.137.850 109 122154
Malta 89I 8050.7362 2952 i
Yugoslavia 228.443 I257»0O61328.374 135152193
Greece l652,365 669.731 535.757 55 15745
Turkey 4.194 !I4.390 5.986:202429
USSR I6.841 I8.421 115.201 150I85334 !
Hungary ' !69,813 77.457 101.736 !!677598
RumaniaI57.021 62.0801 I59.010 85 9288
Bulgaria I46.515 I67.1631 76.059 608697
Lorocco 36.392 II94.954' 901.434r 1o15146 i
Algeria 210.462 376.788 2.67O.0O9 3639 i
Tunisia !104.795 142.909 ι872.379 1419116 1
Repuolic ofSouthAfrica !87.133 72.494 86.724 117 97116 i
UnitedStates 428 662 83587138169
Chile 4.930 I2.399 2,779 331618 i
Argentma 3.800 2.249 13.309 279I65976
Cyprus 209.5U 223.831 I295.624 110118155
Israël 5.100 I5.946 4.890 728469
Australia 30.385 22.012 11.643 16311863 !
Othercountries 37.544 !18.474j17.4504623!22 i
L i
0uiî3ide SUR9 f4.132.330 Γ4.709.770I9.225.357 3875 :
Inside EUR9 12.122.613 16.709.681 14.216.047 I
1
Totalimports j16.254.=948 !21.419*451 i23.441.4041
\
.i i'
lourco:Kecanojraphic listings fromEUROSTAT andconrminicationsfromtheMemberStates *

xa
lio
Nu
22
11
15
21
25
31
35
41
42
44
45
47
51
56
57
59
61
69
'.vot
Sou.External tradeinwine
Heading22,05Brussels Nomenclature :wineoffreshgrapes
Importsfromnon-member countries (outside-MJR 6)effectedduring1972
Quantitiesinhectolitres valuein1000dollars
EUR6
LPrance '!ILCU
14.169
808
63.491
1.C08.192
8.293
114.806
57.147
272,403
39-062
4.521
90.960
72.366
330.666
■125
,36.033
1
114.457
3.027.500 ;Importing MemberStates
;276
0
5-477
566.973
'2.352
44.052
581
11.572
39.062
-125
16.365
25.206
153.012 .
7
27
L
6
865.600561
0
9-032
367.253
^576
6.429
2.136
.5-556
0
,308
2,197
3.550
22,570
32
335
0
20
420.555Netherlands
154
'7.416
105.016
553
32-715
47.789
220.673
0
397
22.635
17.179
113.705
0
27.583
0
25.970
621.912PP.Germany I
<5.295
636
24.390
743.95^
3,219
30.268
4.275
34.600
0
3.610
49-243
11,466
41.226
0
8.077
0
88.461
I.O51.718
iUROSTAT-mécanographie listingsItaly
5-030
13
17.176
24.993
1.487
1.342
2.366
2
C
31
0
14.965
153
86
11
0
0
67.715EUSç
1.765
131
4.528
35.948
1541
2.611
4.877
12.299
667
305
2.022
.7-426
18.433
6
682
1
1.819
94.061Importing MemberStates
Franc0
2o
0
510
8.341
.125
•825
4
549
657
6
402
2.163
9.068
0+
1
1
0-1-
22.732BLEU IîTetlierlands
71
0
542
6.455
49
•140
203
297
0
-25
35
458
1.464
2
9
0
1
9.7511
15
576
1,612
40
712
3.774
9.202
0
31
517
1.411
5.401
0
412
0
274
23.984FRGermany -Italy
1.465
115
1.904
19.096 .
219
906
550
2.250
0
237
1.068
1.614
2.484
0
259
0
1.544
33.711202,
1
996'
444
102
28'
302j
li
i
!
0
1.780
16
4
1
0
0
3.883!

Tabla15internal tradeinwines
Heading22.0Brussels Nomenclature :wine
Importsfromnon-neniber countries (outside-iGUR 6)offreshgrapes
effectedduring1973
¥.ocode
ilime;:.e
22.05Quantities inhectolitres
Importing MemberStates
6.<
F.EUR6
Ii
!
I..
ijyranoe BLEUI
iLetherlands .?IlGsrmany .Italy
13.9GS 2A2 905 88 11.492 I1.13?
464I26?!0 132 3 !60
107-073 15.502 16.635 14.254 37-556 23.131
i.601.2224-062.751 347.934 124.094 807.474 253.959
fî-91^1.671 723 2.962 1.776 τ.7ΗA•I
307.986132.903 I6.432 78.664 6/.C0125.086
68.845 9664.123 54.973 5-939 !2,844
218,821 ]12.04.6 6.215 :170.142 II30,418 i0
I8.511I
iI13.263
f13 235 0 0
56.173 ,46.659 446 |2.410 6.540 118
1083221*ê£6.459 42.152 I64.164 31
103.248 39.569 7.771 17.013 16.54122.349
507.563 155^34423.363 84.831 43.251 27A
84
I0 60 0 0 2A
12.989 !3.239 347 I745 8.423 !235
0 0 0 0 3
15.319 I0
I10i
I1I15.288 20
949-53314.490.900!416.016 I
L__ .i592.701 !1.112.866!
i337.050
r.osi'JjT •-m^cano/p?et)hic-7Valuein1000dollars
Importing MemberStat
EUR6
2.439
22
7.973
102.493
672
7.224
7.105
13.445
377
1.593
2.959
12.522
22.195
11
516
1
396France
19
.4
I.I09
64.384
79
2,726
69
623
363
937
62.
3,634
II.430
0
53
0
0
131.953 -105.,682BLEU
76
0
932
7.327
67
159
419
386
1
36
27
1.091 .
1.944
7
10
0
4
12.486Netherlands

Table16 Externaltradeinwines
Heading22.05Brussels Nomenclature :wineoffreshgrapes
Exportsfromnon-member countries (outside-EUR 6)effectedduring1972
i
iN°coae
Nimexe
22.05 EUR6Quantities inhectolitres ! .
i
EUR6Valuein1000dollars
Exporting MemberStates Exporting MemberStates_______ _____
France IBLEUfNetherlands FRGermany Italy FranceBLEUjNetherlands i
I
ι ι ιIFRGermany Italy
-i
11650.151 552.500120I
t220.443 77.086 i78.441 67.990 14 12.908 7.528 .
152.115 213142 1 471 1.38Ssvi22 6 0+ 32 93
212.586.259 I.779.O86 723 193332.885 473.372J:196.253 ~126.585 68 8336.760 32.760
252.151-339 893.858 7 9102*819 1.154.64$ 76.268 47.288 j1 14.633 24.345
31114.133 107.429 35 27 30 6.612)'|11.691!11.079 |7j. 28 595
i351102.681 91.836 ί0 I8 1510.822 9.457 I9.078 |0 0+ 2' 377
41 ί4.351 jί3.327 7 0 4 ,1.01J363 303 ,1 0 1 I78
42 48 ιI ■024 24I■00 5 0
l4 1 0 0
344.677 jI131 10 I 0 04.496 153!110!I 0
i0 142
4520.383 19.909 4 ! 6 462 717 671 1 0+ 1 44
47 4.833 1.241 0 93 103.489 154 38 0 1 '112
512.986 !I.2688
127 12.682 !
i269 31 1 3 0+ 234
56 214 I 0214 0 0 Oi 033i"°.0 0
572.563 I 40 0i02.559 71i-10 0 70
59I
I1.064 6160 0 0 448 30 16 0 0 0 14
61: 6I30 0 0 3 1 1...0 0 0 0+
6911.426 11.357 9 0 0 60803 800 1 0 0 2
JTota.1^659.229 û.461.828
I111931386456.684 1.739.138 374.885|263.914
''1-–~1–•137! 94
i44.346 66.394
Source:EUROSTAT –mecanographio listings

Table17 External -tradeinwines
Heading22.05Brusselsnomenclature :Wineoffreshgrapes
Exportsfromnon-member countries (outBideEUR$)effectedduring1973
]Jocode
ITimexe
22.05Quantities inhectolitres Valuein1000dollars .
Exporting MemuerStates
EUR6Ezportinp -:MemberStates
EUR6
l–_.AFrance |BLEU!
.Netherlands jPRGermany !Italy Prance tBLEUjFetherlands FRGermany |Italy
11 743-733(
625.677 I,
214 ! 2 24.795 92.956 107.968 94.845 22 0+3.476 9-615
h-5 19-153I 15-027 10I0I815 i3-306 1.384 I1.068 0+ 0 70 246
213.064.815 ^1^948.293 1.236
: l.471 465.600 i649.215290.650 184.847 I84 11157.104 48.404
25 2,376.22.4 1,165.296 !19 119 99.3161.111.574 104.326 66.368 9 0+5.632 32.317
31 !114-6551 107.851 2 10;466.746 i14.955 14.104 1 3 7 760
35 106.131
197.328 149 56 i78;!8.520I
I13.457 :12.964 12 I8 2 471
41 4.0891
12.932 0
1001.157 I415 289 0 0 0 126
t.(d. 1 0 25 3 4 0I L. 0 4 0+ 0+ 0
44 3ΓΛΤ•<-7I 300 0 0 02.997 129 18;0ι0 I0 i111
45 9,328 8.088 0;
I1 251.2141
1379 242I0I0+ 7 130
47 126.532 24.262 0 2. 72.261
I-844 757 0 0+ 1 86
Ρ1 3.155 1.074 126 0 -211.9341
I343 122 24 I0 6 191
56 168 ! 0I33 0 4!
It I1310 0 0 0+ 7
57 628;41!0; 0 0i587iI31 i5 0 0 0 26
59 .2.707 1.475 0 0 01.232I146 111 0 0 0 35
61 858 857 0 0 0τ!' I1! 1\ 53 53 0 0 0 0-
69 68.112 27.449 I31.298
t!0|9.3651
|2.236|1.448 1
10584 0 204
!Total I
t '6.543.622 !4.026.039 !1.814l31.862 .i590.711
: t;l.893.196i1537.323 '377.321 i262!70666.3o592.729
Source:EURQSTAT-■■.ecc-.nographic listings

Table18:ITALY-Development ofaresundervinesandoutputoftablegrapes
Are(Ha)r~~–7Productie ::i(100ks) .!
Purocultivation mixsdcultivación total I^ ■ 1–■
tQcli–––
prooafcsed inbowine I
1963 68.659« ––1
I"10.741
I7.256*000M" ' irmmmmit ■m».i ■ '
2.459*000
1964 71-91i2 8.324 7.966.000 2•5î0•OU)
1965(c.^..^O |
I7.959 8.352.000 1.473*000
1966 73.831 i7.157 8.352,000 1.192,000
1967 76,785 !6.548I
10.786.000 2.357«000
1968 I77.720 I5.723 9.227.000 2.158.000
1969 '(8.433 5.165 11.162.000 3.116,000 .
1970 73.4^3 2.761 12.117.000 4.197*000
1971 70.914 2.421 . 11.386.000 4.058»000
1972 72.010 * l2.460*
II10.570.000 4.733,000
1973 72.744 * 2.381* 12.353.000 * 5.384.000 *
!1974
L l ;|I
I
1i :
i
Sourcesannuariodistatistica agraria
*provisionai data

Table19:Month-by–nionth quantities ofwineforwhichimportlicences were
issuedbetweenFebruary 1973and.April1975« >
WinesfromtheMaghreb,
Morocco Algeria Tunisia
1973:February
March
April
Mcy
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
1974:January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
IH1January
February
March
April
May37.208
61.151
50.644
93.758
71.500
102.908
78.I84
29.126
133.815
164.586
58.045
4.122
II.84O
24.876
34.826
52.250
••44.579
41.634
13.437
1.154
26.708
79.740
47.6I6
302
3.632
2.522
1.816
18.904132.767
129.261
128.317
■231.894
322.953
398.636
402.818
372.964
252.152
254.806
244.577
97.235
34.790
51.896
47.474
78.420
68.889
84.813
6O.562
37.139
55.465
154.230
131.859
22.437
7.363
7.228
17.964
30.620î
(1)
&
N
3
2
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
s
(2
(2)
2)
5.237(2)
957(2)
19.126(2)
29(2
18.372(2)39.586
124.686
71.603
136.673
142.522
65.711
46.970
5.858
117.085
127.411
65.306
I8.56I
40.638
61.118
43.244
42.046
49.142
66.531
13.941
25.076
27.886
148.349
117.045
p1(1)Community of6
(2;Community of9

>de
-11
-15
-21
-25
-31
-35
-41
-42
-44
-45
-47
-51
-55
-57
-59
~61
-69NBIEXENOMENCLATURE 1972/73
Description
Sparkling wines
Wineinbottleswith"mushroom "stoppersheldinplace "bytiesorfastenir ^■,
andwineotherwiese putupwithanexcesspressure ofnotlessthanoneat-'>
mospherebutlessthanthreeatmospheres ,measuredatatemperature of20c,
Otherwinesandgrapemustsofanactualalcoholic strengthnotexceeding
13°>incontainers holding twolitresorless.
Otherwinesandgrapemustsofanactualalcoholic strength notexceeding
13°,andincontainers holding morethantwolitres.
Otherwinesandgrapemustsofanactualalcoholic strength exceeding 13°
butnotexceeding 15°,incontainers holding 2litresorless.
Otherwinesandgrapemustsofanactualalcoholic strength exceeding 13°
notexceedin -15°,incontainers holdingmorethan2litres.
Otherwines,ofdesignated origin,ofanactualalcoholic strength exceeding
15°butnotexceeding 18°incontainers holding 2litresorless.
Port,Madeira,SherryandSetubalmuscatel ofdesignated originofanactual
alcoholic strength ofmorethan15°andnotexceeding 18°andincontainer-
holding morethan2litres.
Otherwines,ofdesignated origin,exceptPort,Madeira,SherryandSebutal
muscatel ofanactualalcoholic strength exceeding 15°butnotexceeding 1/
andincontainers holding morethan2litres.
Otherwines,withoutdesignated originandgrapemustsofanactualalcoho­
licstrength ,exceeding 15°butnotexceeding 18°andincontainers holding
2litresorless.
Otherwines,withoutdesignated originandgrapemustsofanactualalcoho­
licstrength exceeding 15°butnotexceeding 18°andincontainers holding
morethan2litres.
Otherwinesofdesignated originofanactualalcoholic strength exceeding
18°butnotexceeding 22°andincontainers holding 2litresorless.
Port,Madeira,SherryandSetubalmuscatel ofdesignated originofanac­
tualalcoholic strength exceeding 18°andnotexceeding 22°andincontai­
nersholding morethan2litres.
Otherwinesofdesignated origin,exceptPort,Madeira,SherryandSetubal
muscatelofdesignated originofanactualalcoholic strengthexceeding 18°
andnotexceeding 22°andincontainers holdingmorethan2litres.
Otherwineswithoutdesignated origin,andgrapemusts,ofanactualalco­
holicstrength exceeding 18°butnotexceeding 22°.
Otherwinesandgrapemustsofanactualalcoholic strength exceeding 22°
andincontainers holding 2litresorless.
Otherwinesandgrapemustsofanactualalcoholic strengthexceeding 22c
andincontainers holding morethan2litres.

Evolution delaproduction etdesutilisations internes devin
delaCommunauté aSix
(enmillionsd'hectolitres )
175 "S
170_ 1_170
I65_ /\165
16°_ /\160
155– /_155
150L A .J150
x45L\_ /.\ .–145
140 \ ~\v" 140
130_ ^\\/–130
125–1-7 –125
120 \/ 120
115– Production –115
110 .... . Utilisations 110
0^ IIIIIIII IIIIUtilisations
internes
52/6363/6464/6565/5666/6767/6868/6969/7070/7171/7272/7373/7474/75_115
110
_rf.0
CE-DG.VI-D-2
I;»B«–Lechiffredesutilisations internes netientpascomptedesdistillations
exceptionnelles :pourl'Allemagne (campagne1974/75)»T>ourlaFranceetl'Italie(àpartirdelacampagne1970/71)*(Voirtableaun°9)
Graphique n°1

Evolution delaproduction devindanslespaysdelaCommunauté
(enmilliers d,hectolitres )
13.000 13.000
11.000–DEUTSCHLAND BR - 11.000
9.000 /\/\9,000
7.000– ^ ~~7,000
5.000 5.000
.3.000| ; 3.000
.90.000 90.000
80.000 FRANCE 80.000
70.000–\ J\/-70.000
60.000––Xr– 60.000
\/
50.000 V 50.000
40.000 [40.000
90.000 ITALIA .90.000
80.000 –80.000
70.000 . . - –70.000
60.000 ~\ –60.000
50,000L 50.000
300 300
250 LUXEMBOURG –250
200 /\ 200
150 –~~–"–/\ –150
100 100
o> 0"
62/6363/6464/6565/6666/6767/6868/6969/7070/7171/7272/7373/7474/75
Graphiquen°2 ICS-SG.VI-D-2

Evolution desutilisations internes devindanslespaysdelaCEE
(enmilliersd'hectolitres ).
15.000 . .15.000
lj.000 DEUTSCHLAND BR
11.000
9.000
7.000
5.000
II.3.-Lechiffredesutilisations internes ,pourlacampagne
1974/75»r.etientpascomptedesdistillations exceptionnelles­
(voirtableaun°9)*–13.000
11.000
9.000
–7.000
5.000
80.000 FRANCE .... 80.000
70.000 7°'000
60.000^ 60.000
50.000– –50.000
40.000 40.00050.000
40.000
ïï.B.–Lechiffredesutilisations internes ,apartirdelacampagne1970/71,netientpascomptedesdistillations exceptionnelles
(voirtableaun°9;*
80.000
70.000
60.000
50.000
40,000ITALIE
70.000
60.000
50.000
40.000
N.B.-Lechiffredesutilisations internes ,apartirdelacampagne1970/71,netientpascomptedesdistillations exceptionnelles
(voirtableaun°9/»
200 LUXEMBOURG 200
150 ^ 150
100 ^~ 100
50_ _50
0> ^0
62/6363/6464/6565/6666/6767/6868/6969/7070/7171/7272/7373/7474/75
Graphique n03 ICE-DlCE-DG.VI-D-2

Evolution desutilisations internes devindanslespaysdelaCEE
(enmilliersd'hectolitres )
1.400
1.200
1.000
800
600
400
200NEDERLAND1.400
tJEDERLAND 1.200
–1.000
_800
600
... _400
200
1.600 1.600 1.600...
1.400–BELGIQUE/BELGIË 1.400 -
1.200_ _1.200
1.000 1.000
800_ 800
600_ _600
o>: ; 0
62/6363/6464/6565/6666/6767/6868/6969/7070/7171/7272/7373/7474/75
Graphique n°ACE-DG.VI–D–2

Evolution desutilisations internes de-vindansles-pays-delaCEE–
- (enmilliersd'hectolitres ) ..
3.500 , 3.500
3.000 TTMTTETi KTNGDOM ..}.000 UNITED KINGDOM Lit000
2.500 / 2.500
2.000– - 2.000
I.500I 1.500
90 90
80IRELAND 80
70 ^._70
60 60
50_ .. -_50
40! ; .4.0
600
500 DANMARK
400
300
200
S600-,
/500
_400
300
200
<0
62/6363/6464/6565/6666/6767/6868/6969/7070/7171/7272/7373/7474/75
Graphique n°5 CE-DG.VI-D-2

1 : ' i : ' I '! i ' ' i i '■ i■ i aVo/ If i i •ii–i–i_ ,|_jjL_;j–juL iiL_L; iiil_Lj ■i_nÆlfaJ ;1_j :!I:i4ce;-dqv|r-li-2 i|L_.iL...j;|J|[i:1;j._..Ii..i4iU-j 1-----i ■
!__ ;I:iL_OTQLurioioiLPijixMompoxi.iùiiA'JTAiiœ .j}iss..:vms|sTA3iiélàprodix:tïoh1)I}l|L_j_| II'
–Ill:IJI]!TD !–L.!T"!–-Type_-S„Ì-JVinAronferà1:0-àJ2l°I![!L_ji I!i[I]Iì![–!-l'–
.I:T i l i1 ! i r1 •1:r i ■1.i , , :r ,; , ; :-r,1: ;r , ,
-';c/(AiII1I–;1: i ii'I'!'i'■– i!:1i:I11:1h 1 :i:li;■1–Vi'I--
-I I i-f–4■-Veroha:.. ........ j:j...... ........... ...J j.I| j j: i i
.-iUUQCL I_LJ___J iiBfeiirs, IMI ■ :I^---'--1-4IiM i 1 Li__L __! .
.1 i|!–J–:– ;Coir,nriùnau't4 ■;–,t.1.......... ,;L\i...L; : i ,_?j.2ooi_i j!!|'|jj :|;,L___L; !I;yaII\ilLLi_ ;'–i
!.i.I_iprixdedôcleachou :eat..;.....J..j..i–..._..i/''\\.: ...■ ji...!...
.μ_-ϋτ~γ , ^ν ιί–ί..ιμ -Χΐν,VI _.I,υτ. I ί ■ 1 Γ1Α.ΥτΓ–τ~γ ^1; ■Γ ι ί
I:.|-i---1*9réfères*.11. ;....,j,;|;i...i..U.;iU ; ;•■!! i_2.,'oca }j'I SiiiiI.,[4––1– ! ;ji •':{,i'lp U
i i in... 1 i :!/■ti .r\ :i : •1;!' .i- ! I■ ! i- i-:-!--i........... -L.:-i-Iiil'v.-L-i,4 !! !• ■ :
l^coI.j!.._Lij_ ;i!i;:l!,;[Li.\jiLi-i-j^^r"7~~;n'ni.;;i•i
! |i;|; I■'Ii L 1\\ i i|l"'t:a0°II~II-"'~\~~~ I-- :r7:f]'H"u Iiar
•-' ;i■■(| ■i- ■■i!-- /■ \I .- i---i–J.»jZQ-Q....–i I–:i_i|– 1i-k-i=:il/j/; :\\^–■\IN 1'i--- i–li-
■ \ i i isIT i i ii. :r.iy i. :Ti, a .ti:i ;r~:' V l:\/I ! iM ir--■-/'H''-1T"i-,Yv1n\i^. 1-H ■} .1 fYî^v.I yf '"---rîT i
I!! :I:4 ί: !.ΓίΙ.-44Λ-4-- ■··:-I,Γ4-4:.. ,!.ί:!
|,sco„1^...|_i_^VL~ '^"'' ^ :|■
r,.iOQ |•j-{••••]-»|j "i~'i:'"'''r; '~h
!»I '|MI i,1 i;,I-I-I■■ i---:|-r----y;■■, ,
: JjA.$Oft2j|PKAl|J)AfOjfDk?ilAMJJA$O?IDJP«A.iJJA$O.if.D4PtjA11JJijOJf.BJFilA\\
i.4I■119"rJi1I1IW|i"|I[:"197?:!(!;19|3 !'4":197;4:'[1197-5;i
ji)Kcçyenn^ariihnét|ique -juBqùTaujnoisjd'Août19^2-tioyêiinëpondéréeà{partirdu|mois]de «lepteiibreI972.I';||' i:i!."!'!
f ■"""i""!"i'i~i"t ■1ii":1"r;i.r^ir:r■rr\~i~r-r' -r:~r:"iii™:"1:t~"
■ ■-4 II II.■i|-: |-1:■i-, 4■■, i-■;i4i.Li-i-IL__.1'_.i !i.....i. ... i_ji_..;..„.J...... '.i! _ I!...i....