ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Electronic displays are among the heaviest consumers of electricity in households (after refrigeration appliances) and are subject to minimum energy efficiency requirements and labelling in most parts of the world.

Current EU ecodesign requirements for televisions and television monitors no longer ensure cost-effective energy savings. The current energy label no longer enables consumers to differentiate effectively between the appliances on the market and the information it provides no longer reflects real patterns of use.

Moreover, the scope of existing ecodesign and energy labelling regulations is unclear and there is some uncertainty as to whether some products are covered. An increasing proportion of devices on the market are not covered. A better level playing field for industry is needed and it is sometimes difficult for market surveillance authorities to assess the scope of the regulations for proper market surveillance.

Finally, electronic displays have a significant environmental impact beyond energy consumption and use materials that require specific attention at end of life: displays make up 75% of the weight of electric and electronic waste in the category of consumer electronics.

This revision will enable the EU to:

·achieve further cost-effective energy savings

·continue with effective ecodesign and energy labelling measures

·further pursue Circular Economy objectives.
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Council of Members of the International Olive Council (IOC), concerning the elimination of the category ordinary virgin olive oil from Annex B of the International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives, 2015

Draft Decision No. DEC-III. 3/115-VI/2022 concerning the elimination of the category ordinary virgin olive oil from Annex B of the International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives, 2015





DECISION No. DEC-III. 3/115-VI/2022

CONCERNING THE ELIMINATION OF THE CATEGORY ORDINARY VIRGIN OLIVE OIL FROM ANNEX B OF THE INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT ON OLIVE OIL AND TABLE OLIVES

THE COUNCIL OF MEMBERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL OLIVE COUNCIL,

Having regard to the International Agreement on Olive Oil and Table Olives 2015, in particular article 1 ‘Objectives of the Agreement’ concerning standardisation and research, with regard to the standardisation of national and international legislation and the harmonisation of physico-chemical and organoleptic analyses, the improvement of knowledge of the compositional and quality characteristics of olive products with a view to consolidating international standards that allow for the control of product quality, international trade and its development, the protection of consumer rights and the prevention of fraudulent and misleading practices and adulteration, and Chapter VI ‘Provisions concerning standardisation’;

Having regard to article 32.1 of the International Agreement, the International Olive Council may, through the Council of Members, amend the Agreement by consensus;

Having regard to article 32.2 of the International Agreement, the Council of Members shall set the deadline for Members to notify the depositary of their acceptance of the amendment in question;

Having regard to article 32.3 of the International Agreement, the amendment shall enter into force 90 days after the depositary has received notification of its acceptance by all Members;

Having regard to the ongoing revision of the Codex Alimentarius standard CODEX STAN 33/81;

Having regard to the need for harmonisation between international standards to facilitate international trade and prevent confusion;

Considering the unanimous proposal made by the Quality Strategy Expert Group at its meetings in April 2021 and in May 2022;

Considering the recommendations made at the 10th meeting of the Committee on Chemistry and Standardisation during the 115th session of the Council of Members;





DECIDES
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 214/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8525 — Apax Partners/Safety-Kleen)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 214/01)

On 28 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8525. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 222/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8507 — GENUI/Summit/Sycamore/Market Logic Software)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 222/03)

On 3 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8507. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 218/15

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8504 — EDF Energy Services/ESSCI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 218/03)

On 29 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8504. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8563 — Intervias/Esso Italiana business, to the following address:
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8553 — Banco Santander/Banco Popular Group, to the following address:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 253/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8538 — IFM/OHL/OHL Mexico)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 253/02)

On 11 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8538. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 250/21

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8498 — Toray/Mitsui/Soda)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 250/04)

On 24 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8498. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 268/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8443 — TPG/Oaktree/Iona Energy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 268/01)

On 17 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document 32017M8443. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 255/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8563 — Intervias/Esso Italiana Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 255/01)

On 28 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8563. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8449 — Peugeot/Opel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 282/03)

On 5 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8449. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— for CVC: The CVC Group provides advice to and manages investment funds and platforms,

— for PAI: PAI is a private equity company that manages and advises a number of funds that own companies in various business sectors, such as business services, food and consumer, general industries, healthcare, and retail and distribution,

— for Cortefiel: Cortefiel is active in the production and retail distribution of clothing and, to a limited extent, retail distribution of footwear and accessories.
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8559 — AUNDE/Bader/JV, to the following address:
On 31 August 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— IFM Investors Pty Ltd (Australia)

— PSA International Pte Ltd B (Singapore), controlled by Temasek Holdings (Singapore)

— Mersin Uluslararası Liman İşletmeciliği A.Ş. (Turkey)

IFM Investors Pty Ltd (‘IFM’) and PSA International Pte Ltd (‘PSA’) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Mersin Uluslararası Liman İşletmeciliği A.Ş. (‘MIP’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8632 — TSR Recycling/Remondis, to the following address:
On 13 September 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Axis Capital Holdings Limited (Bermuda) (‘Axis’),

— Novae Group PLC (United Kingdom) (‘Novae’).

Axis acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Novae.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
On 8 September 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Shell Midstream Partners (Shell Midstream, United States), controlled by Royal Dutch Shell plc (Shell, United Kingdom),

— Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings (United States) controlled by First Reserve Management LP (First Reserve, Cayman Islands) and Crestwood Equity Partners LP (Crestwood, United States),

— Crestwood Permian Basin LLC (United States) controlled by Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings.

Shell Midstream acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control over Crestwood Permian Basin. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8601 — Greenergy/Inver, to the following address:
On 19 September 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Platinum Equity Group (United States),

— Pattonair Holdings Limited (United Kingdom).

Platinum Equity Group (‘Platinum’) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation the whole control of Pattonair Holdings Limited (‘Pattonair’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
On 3 October 2017 the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— GETEC Wärme und Effizienz AG (‘GETEC’, Germany), controlled by EQT Fund Management SARL (Luxembourg) and GETEC Energy Holding GmbH (Germany),

— Briva Group B.V. (‘Briva’, the Netherlands), controlled by the Ten Brinke Group B.V. (the Netherlands),

— Joint Venture (‘JV’, Germany).

GETEC and Briva acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over JV.

The concentration is accomplished by way of a purchase of shares and by way of contract of management or any other means in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 337/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8468 — NorgesGruppen/Axfood/Eurocash)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 337/02)

On 16 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8468. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 348/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8520 — Cinven/CPPIB/GTA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 348/05)

On 11 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8520. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8628 — Eneco/Renault/Jedlix)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 346/03)

On 10 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8628. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
On 6 October 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Ruhrpark SAS (France), belonging to the group AXA SA (‘AXA’, France),

— Agiform SAS (France), belonging to the group AXA,

— ACEF Holding SCA (Luxembourg), belonging to the group AXA,

— Unibail-Rodamco Beteiligungs GmbH, controlled by Unibail-Rodamco Germany GmbH (both of Germany), belonging to the group Unibail-Rodamco (France),

— Paunsdorf Centre Luxco Sàrl (Germany).

AXA and Unibail-Rodamco acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Paunsdorf Centre Luxco Sàrl.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
On 11 October 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Avantor, INC. (USA), controlled by Mew Mountain Capital LLC (USA),

— VWR Corporation (USA).

Avantor acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of VWR.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares. The same concentration was already notified to the Commission on 15 September 2017, but the notification was subsequently withdrawn on 9 October 2017.
On 26 October 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— DIF Management Holding B.V (DIF, Netherlands)

— Caisse des dépôts et consignations (CDC, France)

— ADTIM SAS (ADTIM, France)

DIF and CDC acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of ADTIM.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 364/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8650 — LGP/CPA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 364/01)

On 20 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8650. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.