ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES 
DE LA COMMISSION 
 
 
 
COLLECTION RELIEE DES 
DOCUMENTS "COM" 
 
 
 
 
COM (83) 481 
 
 
 
Vol. 1983/0 181 
  
 
Disclaimer  
Conformém ent au règlement (CEE, Euratom) n° 354/83 du Conseil du 1er février 1983 
concernant l'ouverture au public des archives historiques de la Communauté économique 
européenne et de la Communauté européenne de l'énergie atomique (JO L 43 du 15.2.1983, 
p. 1), tel que modifié par le règlement (CE, Euratom) n° 1700/2003 du 22 septembre 2003 
(JO L 243 du 27.9.2003, p. 1), ce dossier est ouvert au public. Le cas échéant, les documents 
classifiés présents dans ce dossier ont été déclassifiés conformément à l'article 5 dudit 
règlem ent. 
In accordance with Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 of 1 February 1983 
concerning the opening to the public of the historical archives of the European Econom ic 
Communit y and the European Atom ic Energy Communit y (OJ L 43, 15.2.1983, p. 1), as 
amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1700/2003 of 22 September 2003 (OJ L 243, 
27.9.2003, p. 1), t his file is open to the public. Where necessary, classified documents in this 
file have been declassified in conformity with Article 5 of the aforementioned regulation.  
In Übereinstimmung mit der Verordnung (EWG, Euratom) Nr. 354/83 des Rates vom  1. 
Februa r 1983 über die Freigabe der historischen Archive der Europäischen  
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und der Europäischen Atomgem einschaft (ABI. L 43 vom  15.2.1983,  
S. 1), geändert durch die Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 1700/2003 vom 22. Septem ber 2003  
(ABI. L 243 v om 27.9.2003, S. 1), ist diese Datei der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit  
erforderlich, wurden die Verschlusssachen in dieser Datei in Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 5  
der genannten Verordnung freigegeben.  
COMMISSION  OF THE  EUROPEAN  COMMUNITIES 
COM(83) 481 final 
Brussels,  25th July 1983 
REPORT 
COMMISSION  EXPERT  GROUP ON METHODOLOGY  IN THE  DISTRIBUTION 
OF THE NORTH SEA  HERRING STOCK 
COM(83) 481 final 

EXPLANATORY  MEMORANDUM 
This  report was produced by the  Commission  expert Group on methodology 
in the distribution of the North Sea herring stock in response to the 
terms of reference agreed at the  Council  of  11-12  July  1983. 

COMMISSION EXPERT  GROUP ON METHODOLOGY  IN THE  DISTRIBUTION  OF 
THE NOTRH SEA HERRING  STOCK 
1. TERMS OF REFERENCE 
To consider, using  the criteria  for distribution  underlying art.  4 of 
Regulation  n° 170/83  of 25 January  1983, a  theoretical  distribution  of 
the North Sea herring stock  for human  consumption. 
To examine  the question  of reaching  such a distribution  in function  of 
the recovery  of the  stock. 
To consider  the factors  affecting  the division  of resultant  quotas  between 
sub-zones  IVa, IVb and IVc. 
2. MEETINGS 
The group met on 15  July 1983 and on 20  July 1983. 
3. PARTICIPANTS 
F. D'ANIELLO 
E. BERLE 
P. de GRAND RY 
F0URNEYR0N 
KAAE 
N. KLEESCHULTE 
A.G. KUYK 
A. LAG IS 
J. L0KKEGAARD 
L. MAERTENS 
K. NORMARK 
H. 00STR0M 
R.J. PACKER 
J. ROWAN 
B. SPANGGAARD(Miss) 
B. WIGOTSKI 15/7 20/7 15/7 20/7 
(I) X X For the Commission  : 
(D) - X M. HOLDEN X X 
(B) X X C. HERBST X X 
(F) X X D. TYSON X -
(DK) - X 
(D) X -
(UK) X X Observers  (Council)  : 
(GR) X X Mr. CONTAGYRIS X X 
(DK) X X Miss MECKMANN X X 
(B) X X 
(DK) X X 
(NL) X X 
(UK) X X 
(IRL) X X 
(DK) X -
(DK) X X 

- 2 -
4. PROCEDURE 
The group  agreed  firstly,  to examine  the manner in which each of the 
criteria  of 30 May 1980  should be used in any  model and secondly  to deter­
mine the model,.  Subsequently,  the model would be used to calculate theo­
retical  distributions  as a function  of the  recovery  of the  stock. The 
factors  affecting  the division  of the  resultant  quotas  between  divisions 
IVa, IVb and  IVc, Vlld would then be examined. 
5. CATCH STATISTICS 
Calculations  should be based on a published  set of  catch statistics. 
Those published  in ICES Cooperative  Research  No. 60  (Appendix  Tables 
4 to 8 and  ICES Documents  CM 1979/H  : 6 (Tables  2.3 - 2.7) and CM  1980/H:  4 
(Tables 3.1 and 3.2) are the  most appropriate  because  : 
1. catch  statistics  are available  for the  four relevant  ICES divisions 
IVa, IVb and  IVc, Vlld; (those  for divisions  IVa and IVb are  available 
separately  : those for IVc and  Vlld are combined  and are not  available 
separately). 
2. The catches  of adult herring  and of  young herring  are shown separately. 
It was noted that, for some Member  States,  the separation  of catches 
between  divisions  was probably  based on estimates  and not on  actual catch 
stat i sti cs. 
The official  statistics  published  by EUROSTAT and in the  ICES Bulletins 
Statistiques  do not  give catches  by ICES divisions  for all Member  States 
and they provide only  total catches, irrespective  of the  type of fishery. 
It was agreed  that catches  of young herring should  not be  included  in 
calculating  traditional  fishing  because  they were caught in a directed 
fishery for reduction  to meal and oil. All catches  of adult herring 
should be included.  There  is no  objective  method of distinguishing adult 
herring  caught  directly  for reduction  to meal and oil from herring  caught 
for human  consumption  and sold for reduction  as a result of lack of market 
demand at the  time of landing. 
Catch statistics  for the  North Sea are  given in Annexes  I to IV. 

- 3 -
6. PERIOD  FOR CALCULATING  TRADITIONAL  FISHING 
There was no  agreement  upon the period  which should be use. The period 
1973-78  was generally considered inappropriate for North Sea herring 
because  the stock was collapsing during  1973-76  and in 1977-78  the fisheries 
were closed. 
A longer period was  thought  more appropriate but there was no  agreement 
as to what it should be. 
Suggestions included : 1960 - 1969 
1950 - 1976 
1950 - 1969 
1967 - 1976 
1973 - 1976 
10 year period for  each Member  State in  which 
its catches  were highest. 
7. HAGUE PREFERENCE 
There was discussion as to  whether  the Hague  Preference should be included 
in the model,  or only allowed to ·  limited  extent,  because  the herring 
fishery  was no longer a coastal fi  hery for whose  benefit  Hague  Preferences 
had been intended.  However,  Annex v.TI of the  Hague Agreement  refers 
to areas where  the local communities  are particularly  dependent  upon 
fishing  and the industries  allied  thereto without specifying the  areas 
in which  these communities  fish. (Council  Document  R/2227/76  (AGRI 644) 
(RELEX 36). 
The Hague  Preference  does not benefit the UK at an EC  share  of the TAC 
greater  than approximately  200.000  t. 
8. JURISDICTIONAL  LOSSES 
Jurisdictional  Losses  should be Limited to  Losses  in the NAFO area because 
it is unlikely  that the  Community  wiLl ever  have catch  possibiLities  for 
herring  in the future and therefore these  Losses  can be  specifically 
quantified. 
Losses should be equalised following  the method  described in document 
SEC (82)930 of 11.6.82, using the  historic  base period for the North Sea. 

- 4 -
The following  method of treating  Jurisdictional  Losses  was decided  : 
1. the maximum  compensation  should be 60 %  similar  to the  level agreed  in 
the settlement  of 25  January  1983 for  other stocks; 
2. the maximum  compensation  should be given at a TAC of  400.000  t (see 
paragraph  11)> 
3. below  this level,  compensation  should be given in proportion  to the 
EC share of the TAC : for  example  50 % when the EC  share was 200.000  t. 
The period  for calculating  Jurisdictional  Losses  is the same as  that used 
for calculating  traditional  fishing,  i.e. 1960-1976. 
9. STOCKS 
There were opposing  views as to  whether  the North Sea herring stock should 
be considered  as a single unit  for the  purposes  of the  model, as stated 
in the terms of reference,  or as  three separate stocks. 
There was a  general  concensus  that the quota allocation  for other stocks 
of herring  had been decided  by the  agreement  of the 25  January  1983 and 
that any model should  refer only to North Sea herring without considering 
any other herring stocks. 
10. THE MODEL 
Calculations  were made on the  basis of the  model described  in document 
SEC(82)930  of 11.06.1982 modified  in the  light of the  discussions  of the 
group. 
Jurisdictional  Losses  were calculated usingthe  method  described  in 
Paragraph  8. 

- 5 -
11. DISTRIB UTION OF QUOTAS  AS A FUNCTION OF THE RECOVERY OF THE STOCK 
The best method  by which to determine  this distribution  would be to 
calculate,  using the model, the allocations  which would  result at various 
levels of TACs. 
Because the historic  market for human  consumption purposes  was 400.000  t, 
it was proposed  that this should  be the maximum TAC for  which allocations 
should be calculated  and that, once this level  of TAC  occured,  a new 
model might be appropriate. 
12. DIVISION  OF RESULTANT  QUOTAS  BETWEEN  ICES DIVISIONS  IVa, IVb and  IVc, Vlld. 
It was agreed  that, if the  resultant  quotas  had to be  divided  between 
divisions,  they should be divided  in the  ratio of the  average  catches  in 
each division  by each Member  State during  the period  selected  for calcu­
lating traditional fishing  within  the limits of the TAC.  Transfers  to 
other divisions  should  be made if  required  toavoid  exceeding  the TAC. 
Some members of the  group thought  it would be better not to  divide the 
quotas by divisions,  even if tie scientific  advice  continued  to be  given 
in this manner. 
13. SUMMARY  RESULTS 
ResuLts are given in Annexes  V to |x. 
They are based on the  following  : 
1. Traditional fishing  : average  of catches  1960-76  : ACFM  statistics 
excluding  young herring. 
2. Hague  Preference  (UK) :  13.170 t. 
3. NAF0 Jurisdictional  Losses  : base period  1960-76. 

/?C- CRONOS.  | ^C/^A/  1 
1 
/%6o 36/2 36^2 /T.76?/ //3 ^oo / y-2 2>6/ /¥83>8S 537.1 /2.S7/2 
3//£ 3//6 /ft? 563 /3B8oo //2 30/^9- 23,0/2. /23<?V-/ /*.!*?/ 
/// ///?- /26000 /o/2*/ 2/2?3 /2 2?/ 8-/S2.I 87V3/ 
^ 1 /8f3 /<?/! //?6oo 53*/5" 2 + V-oO /<fo62- /2.&V-2? /^¥$7 
£/ /Go 7- /¥/6oa 21 223 232S5" //62Z& //6 27.C 
4C /g//S2 /SS7QO <SY?32 77^32 /¥o53 /&/<?o <Po32o cfo32o 
&4> 33/ 33/ /3>S33$ /o S300 ?¥S6  f SI2-i /oT-// 5&6&S ^666,8 
/57c 8f /3Sooo\  3336S 3231 //o/S* //¥?& 372?o 3?2?c 
6 e /3/ /&S8?e Z7-/17 2/2/6 /Z2S2 22Zo6 
63 H8 2oz3o3 /<?o2G>o ¥60 S2 /^73<£ /gesz />3o? 23?£-3 25763 
y^o /loo /<*!•?•/£ /33 V*/ 3<?3o? ?/£o /2>366 //?2z ¥3¥/C 
?/ 6 SI 64/ 23 //5"S" /8S333 3352 3£?0 2o?srr //f*o8 3/3/?-32V^?3 
/3z>2 252 /JT<? 2/3?33 3o^r //33 V1- /2So/ 2^S2^ 
21/X 2/^o 23c?c?^<P / 22 23S" 3/^?o 3/*?o 
?y £<?3> £?£>/3 /2/S\T /37:V /'>5/<? 
7S* 2/S7 //3 oZ2. /o</¥o? Z068/ /£2/S~ 3 1.0 3 3 / 3£oo  ^ 3,; //^ 
?& j //3^ /¥3o 3/<f// ////£ 2o32o Zo//^ 
77- 5Vt <£/23> 22/ 22/ /ST59- -•// & 1 ^0 r /c3 2 
. /<ÒGo-&¥-  /CSS  ActXJU^ - 7? • ^ 
jOrz-M - /3£c-  ?3·- Caro4>Qs^*k*^-  Tilfile  //o o o  / 
^ " /3?v_7?;  /c£S 2>oc.  £.Af./972//Λ:  6 Λ.^.  /cfi ^ 0r C./M . /5^o//V.-  5* 

BUM.  - S -
CA.0NO  5 
¥$3 Wo 
6/ 
331 ?33 
Cri S?33Z ¥/S/ S3 
(øv ΫΖ(ο?38 frem 
VZWo 2£2?-,3 3/?SéZ 2Sé/oo 
el­ 28 &ψ 26 353 2? MS 
èa 23/S<? 2^/2/3 
2<?3/ø 2<??/3 26?32o 
32.^0 3/Stf7 x 3o2t>57- 23o3&£ 
Ψ/ 3ο3σο 232<£>5 32T.390 
?Z 2</·3©6 /?é2/ 32-*5Y3 ^73^32 
?3 /<PJo.S" /82.8ο 2S3S2& 
?r ZoS2) /Ó2/3 /336S3 
ΛΓ32? /53?3 2c?2_/S7 /S?Z<P3 
3??Y5 
3/3/ 23?3é ft N N£'"k  1 
<o -ffl  ff£&tlMG'  /CS S  /V, W/ c£ ' 

- /93νΐΓ  //Sterne- -  /C£S /V z^w* 
— '  flCF/ή  
3 3>/t J> F Λ/Ζ υκ 
9-/So ο ///3? /Ζ*?/3 !| #536σ 7 
C/ &/ SO  ο g ¥355 2 3ο^2 /Ζ5 8¥/ 1 3¥Ζ8// 
éz 65Ό£/ /22?/ 3ψψίο 
éZ J  /8¥3 £"<?3οσ /£ο&Σ. /Ζ&¥8ψ £7332 3 Ϋ?ΗΖ 
/ώα / 5*3 £S¥6o\ 232 35· //éZZG 3JÌS& 23o3V-é 
S/o Ζ 3 /ώ¥8ο <fo32o 32οέ>3 Ζ3Ο3<ΡΖ 
£Co ¥/¥Zc /<??// 2*2/3 /<888&$ 
Cf- i #/o 5*/ Où 3σ¥63 />'¥'/£ • 
Ζί-ζψο 26353 • 
S?/ο ο 2σ363 /Ζ SS '2 223ο£ 2/êoS /3·ΐ36ί> 
WS /5~3ο7- 23765 2&Ή3 /¥& όΨο 
/Ζ ο ο £3223 é?So //¥SZ #62*8 3/58? Ζ&οΗο 
S3 7 / &Σ/ $3232. 5/5 //¥ο8 /Ζ/583 
72 i ——— - • Ζ¥-Ζ nso/ Ζ¥8Ζ5 
Z/bo ¥2/S 3 me 2223S" 3 Υ-οίο /8Ζ8α /2 3 3σσ t 
Τ 
3 5/ο 6 /£;'-  .'3 
75- 2¥5Ι Ϋ33& '2ο33/ 3>2¥Ι(ό /5 3?3 /oê¥S8 
/«ο . 
2o/Vé ζΗη 85IG8 
5? 6/23 2ΖΪ /i (ο/ 2o/Vé 
S5SI 2ο2ο5 
/3 ?-£ Ζ S?6b 

Pi A^/v/c> ILL 
* y/r To-éJL Y* y/r 1 
! 
/3 6o u Y/Sao //3 ¥00 0 22322. /¥838S /5/0 
?73<x> 6/5oo /3S8oo SST,? /é5^3 8L/31S /6,f 
235 7-5" 65o8/ 83oS{> 2C,5 
£~8?oo 585oo //?Uo 60/7 SY758 538/5 
£8Soo 55>/oo /Y/éoo 28/ï.t £l>S8G 3>2,S 
¥37oo /587oo 26**2 5/013 ??o3z 33,«? 
SfSoo 5/ïoo 51,5 /2?37 S¥/SJ- 23,5" 
<?3?oo S/éoO /35000 3oYéZ 323/2 
/ó£ooo 59-/0 0 /êz/oo éS,o <?^7 2o363 2/2/6 ¥,0 
//3 3So /8a 2Go 73oo 9-858 /2?S£ 
7ö Ï33 33/ 52, C é?5o ?fSo 5,(0 
^/ J>~3232 7/3 3cS5 5/5 85,6 
4éi Q7<f S/06S 2/3?33 7£,/ 2823 2Y2 3césr 52,/ 
?3 /2ss<?s </?2in ?yf5 £63>8 53,0 
¥38U 58,S 5"6SS" /2.ÏS5 5y,3 
?r * ?£3*2 27^25" 73,7-/61ÏÏ 72,3 
Z00SÏ /(0/7 
?> é/23 22/ — •" 
7<? 0 — 

Ο 
ileo-  I*ït4 £C  n<mße%  £*υ//Τ/?·<=Γ7  : icgo  <rfl-f<=**t £ 
D F tre ~fo<*\  i_ 
Κ TABLE  * 
1965 0 0 0 262877 
1966 0 0 0 430728 
1967 28171 0 28171 594238 
1968 81201 0 81201 951703 
1969 95629 0 95629 878924 
1970 93896 0 93896 810681 
1971 56505 0 56505 747110 
1972 31333 500 31833 548663 
1973 33846 2794 36640 485437 
1974 26987 4080 31067 433276 
1975 24349 4853 29202 448342 
1976 9551 1196 10747 322533 
1977 0 0 0 282102 
1978 0 0 0 296672 
1979 0 1 1 252970 
1980 0 0 0 260404 
198r 0 
1982 
1983 
1984 

5c tree : 
CrZr.OS 
s-ppler.ented  by 
ICES and NAFO data. . allocations  to  r'/er.ber States b^sed  on iverage catches 
(industrial  catches disallowed) 
showing eTfects of Hague preferences. 
- Tonnes -
Stock 
Herring ./^/ D F NL B UK DK IRL EEC 
TOTAL Hague Preferences Stock 
Herring ./^/ D F NL B UK DK IRL EEC 
TOTAL UK IRL Greenlanc 
1(a) average 
jcatches · · - - · 
jexeluding 
J industrial  catches issa-6I3T-+ /3JC 23?So ¥821+ 0 /SolVt ! 
1975 catches 1(a) average 
jcatches · · - - · 
jexeluding 
J industrial  catches issa-6I3T-+ /3JC 23?So ¥821+ 0 /SolVt /3/7o 
(b) line (a) as % 32/6 O/tZf /5S3 — /oofa 
(c) ^ÇollC average 
c.v.o w.«;>, adjusted  Tor 
|i:ijye preferences '6 m1/- /6S3o ¥82/+ 0 /77é6ï 1975 
catch 1975 
catchx2 TOTAL 
/SoZVf (c) ^ÇollC average 
c.v.o w.«;>, adjusted  Tor 
|i:ijye preferences '6 m1/- /6S3o ¥82/+ 0 /77é6ï 
/2>/?o TOTAL 
/SoZVf 
(d) Line (c) as % /3,'S? o,77 3,33 27,/+ — 100,0 
(e) national 
allocations  based 
on line (d) /332S Lite z</s?z '**8 /33<?3 0 7//30 /2>l7o 1975 
catchx2 
8Y3ao (e) national 
allocations  based 
on line (d) /332S Lite z</s?z '**8 /33<?3 0 7//30 /2>l7o 8Y3ao 
(f) national 
allocations,  inclu­
ding Hague preferences ^3322 2+S72 55/ /38oS /33o3 0 8/300 • 
(g) Line  (f) as % /£,52 7,2$ 25,/A 23, So Z2,So — /oof O 

5c «ree : 
C.-.3.\0S 
suppler.ented by 
ICES and NAFO data. . allocat«-'o/is  to 'ler.ber States  tx3 sed on ;o^c^^ average catches 
(industrial  catches disalloved) 
showing  effects  of Ka^ue preferences. 
- Tonnes -
Stock 1 
D 
Herring ./V | F NL B UK DK IRL EEC 
TOT AL Kague Pref er 
UK | IRL ences 
Greenlanc 
Ca) i9&?/7^>  average 
catches 
excluding 
industrial  catches * /3?6 2S7So O ] 
1975 caiches 
/3/7o| 
(b) line (a) as % 2S"2& — /oo fo 
(c) 19^o/7é  average 
c.-*c. w.*i, adjusted for 
hijje preference3 O ma*/-1975 
catch 1975 
catchx2 TOT AL 
(d) Line (c) as % /s;57 tf,7? 3,33 — 100,0 : 
(e) national 
allocations  based 
on line  (d) 29335 <£>2 £7b3 23S&/ c 
/3/?<J 1975 
catchx2 
/ooooo 
(f) national  4 
allocationst inclu-
ding Ha^ue pref erencea 2.3335" 2/2?3 23S6/ 0 /0000O 
(g) Une Cf) as % 7, Sb 2^2? 23,S& 
\ 

5c 'ree : 
c.-?:::os 
supplemented  by 
ICES and  NAFO  data. . allocst-ohs  to Jfer.ber States b^sed  on jverage catches 
(industrial catches disallowed) 
showing effects  of Hague preferences. 
- Tonnes  -
Stock 
Herring  ./^/ D F NL B UK DK IRL EEC 
TOTAL K=gue  Preferences Stock 
Herring  ./^/ D F NL B UK DK IRL EEC 
TOTAL UK J IRL Greenlanc 
(a) 19^P/7^  average 
|catches 
exeluding 
industrial catches £/3?</ 
• /3?£ 2S?So ¥8ZI+ O 1975  catches (a) 19^P/7^  average 
|catches 
exeluding 
industrial catches £/3?</ 
• /3?£ 2S?So ¥8ZI+ O /3/7o 
(b) line  (a) as  % — A? 0,0 
(c) 19^o/7 £ average 
c.-iVr. u.ei, adjusted  for O 1975 
cata v. 1975 
catchx2 TOTAL 
r.ijue  preferences O TOTAL 
(d) Une  (c) as  % 3,33 — 100,0 * 
(e) national 
allocations based 
on line  (d) 37/33 O /2>/7o 1975 
C2tchx2 (e) national 
allocations based 
on line  (d) 37/33 O /2>/7o 
(f) national 
allocations, inclu­
ding Hague preferences 3?/3B 
.· 
R (g) Une  (f) as  % ?f88 2>f,SI /^2.3 2^?* — .· 
R 

JURISDICTIONAL  LOSSES  IN  EXCLUSIVE  THIRD  COUNTRY  WATERS 
ICES  DIVISION/NAFO  ZONE 
- Tonnes  -
(a) 
iTotal average (b) 
EEC average 
1973/76  catch (c) 
(b) as a  % of 
(a) (d) 
Total  1980  catch 
possibility  with 
no jurisdictio­
nal changes (e) 
Notional share 
of EEC in (d) 
d x b (f) 
Actual EEC 
a I locat ion 
1980 Jurisdictional 
Loss 
406.736 EC 29.112 
D 28.322 
F 790 7,16 
6,96 
0,20 270.000 19.325 
18.801 
524 0 
0 
0 - 19.325  EC 
- 18.801  D 
524 F 
(1) based  on average catches  1977-80 

ANMFY  V'TT 
Jurlsdictfonal  losses 
Stock EC 
TAC EC 
tonnes 1 
i t F 
i t N L 
t i 9 
t I 
% JK 
t I 
I K 
\ 
84.300 
100.000 
150.000 
200.000 
300.000 
400.000 2.443 
2.899 
4.348 
5.799 
8.697 
11.596 
11.595 
11.281 
314 2.377 
2.820 
4.230 
5.641 
8.461 
11.281 
= 60 % of 
= 60 % of 
= 60 % of 19.325 
18.801 
524 66 
79 
118 
158 
236 
314 
1 
1 
1 
i 1 
1 
i 
i 

JUPISniCTIO'-AL  LOSS  - EOUALISATION  TABLE 
Total 0 FCM) j F(SPH) B UK(N) UK(S) DK(M) DKCGL) 
1. 19^0/76  total 
•verage catch 
(exclusive in­
ternat,;  ^olnt 
and 3rd stountiry 
2. JuHsdlctional 
losses O o o 
Equa'.  oereen— 
ta« «. los$ \n 
non-hajjue 
areas?"" - ,2// * 
- -/S * 
-22<P 
'-. Difference * 
transfer to 
equatize jurfs-
dictional  loss • - 5^ -/S ~ 22^ 

JURISDICTIONAL  LOSS  - EQUALISATION!  TABLE 
Total D F(M) F(SPH) NL B UK(N) UK(S) DK(H> DK(GL) 
1. 19^0/76-total 
•verage  catch 
(exclusive  in­
terna^  Joint 
! and 3rd  ^Country X 
3*776 
2. Jurisdictional 
losses - 28$$ -222o - 73 o o o O ' 
i . 
•J. Equal oeJrcen—  • 
! ta« 4.  loss  in 
non-Hague 
areas*"" - 25o • 
- /oo/ -22. • 
- 2?/ -72? 
i». Difference  « 
transfer  to 
equalize  juris­
dictional loss - /oo/ 
• -12 -27/ -?e? 

JURISDICTIONAL  LOSS  - EQUALISATION  TABLE 
Total D F(H) F(SPH) NL B UK(N> UK (S) DK(M> DK(GL) 
1. 19^0/76 total 
vverage catch 
(exclusive  in­
ternat^ ^oint 
and 3rd Country /So 3*7?6 /376 • 
2. JuHsdictional 
losses - m O o o O ' 
Equal  oercen-  " 
tac * los?  in 
non-hague 
areas?'" -251 * 
- /S"o2 • 
-Pol, 
i 1«.. Difference  • 
transfer  to 
equali2e  juris™ 
dictional  loss + 33?i - 2S<? ~ /So2 - 3</ 

JURISDICTIONAL  LOSS  - EQUALISATION  TABLE 
Total D F(M) F(SPH) NL B UK(N> UK(S) DK(M) DK(GL> 
i. 19^0/76 total 
average  catch 
(exclusive  in-
j ternal> Joint 
j and 3rd  ^Country X 
3*7?£ /3?£ /3 /To S6 5&0 • 
2. Jurisdictional 
losses - s-?si O O o o • 
i 
Equal  oercen— -* * 
| ta« *  loss  in 
non-Hague 
areas?' ~//35" - So/ - 2oo3 - ¥B -/57T 4 
j 
Difference  « 
• transfer  to 
equalize  juris­
dictional loss - 3/3 
• -¥S-

JURISDICTI0"AL  LOSS  - EQUALISATION  TABLE 
| Total D F(M) F(SPH) NL B UX(N> UX(5) DKCM) DK(6l 
1. 19^0/76  total 
•verage catch 
(exclusive  in­
ternal;  Joint 
| and  3rd Country 3*77-6 /s /37£ /3 'To X 
2. Jurisdictional 
losses -£¥6/ - 22><o o o a o ' 
Equal  oe>cen— 
! tat  sj. loss  in 
non-Hague 
areas?*" - 75/ * 
- 3oof ~(°7 - 8/2. -23Co 
i«. Difference  • 
transfer  to 
equalize juris­
dictional  loss - 5/5 - 3oof 
• - C? - <*7Z 

JURISDICTIONAL.LOSS - EQUALISATION  TABLE 
I Total D F<M) F(SPH) NL B 'UK(N) UK(S) DK(M) DK(GL) 
1. 19^0/76  total 
average  catch 
(exclusive in­
ternai^  ,)oint 
and 3rd  Country 3?7K /s >W «r/3?7< \ 
?8 2f? • 
?. Jurisdictional 
losses - //28/ - 3/f o o o o ' 
i 
I'J. Equa'.  oercen-
tai «.  loss  in 
non-hague 
areas?*" -22?«? — /ooo • 
- fooé -So • 
- /o&2 -3 
'-. Difference  » 
transfer to 
equalize  juris­
dictional  loss - 6%£> -So - /o82. 
— 

HERRING  MODEL:  FINAL  ALLOCATIONS ANNEX  »X 
(page  1) 
EEC D F NL B UK DK IRL 
Traditional  fishing/Hague 84.300 13.923 6.143 24.572 551 19.808 19.303 
Jurisdictional  Loss  E%. ! 
+1.899 - 145 - 844 - 19 - 228 - 663 
Result 15.822 5.998 23.728 532 19.580 18.640 
Traditional  fishing/Hague 100.000 16.996 7.499 29.995 672 21.273 23.564 
Jurisdictional loss EQ +2.253 - 171 -1.001 - 22 - 271 - 787 
Result - * 
19.249 7.328 28.994 650 21.002 22.777 
Traditional  fishing/Hague 150.000 26.783 11.817 47.268 1.060 25.939 37.133 
Jurisdictional loss EQ. +3.379 - 258 -1.501 - 34 - 406 -1.180 
Result 30.162 11.559 45.767 1.026 25.533 35.953 
Traditional  fishing 200.000 36.446 16.081 64.322 1.442 31.179 50.530 
Jurisdictional loss EQ. +4.506 - 343 -2.003 - 45 - 541 -1.574 
Result 40.952 15.738 62.319 •'•1-397 30.638 48.956 
i 

HERRING  MODEL:  FINAL  ALLOCATIONS ANNEX  IX 
(page  2) 
EEC D F NL B UK DK IRL 
Traditional  fishing 300.000 54.670 24.121 96.483 2.163 46.768 75.795 
Jurisdictional loss EQ +6.758 - 515 -3.004 - 67 - 812 -2.360 
Result 61.428 23.606 93.479 2.096 45.956 73.435 
Traditional  fishing 400.000 72.893 32.162 128.644 2.884 62.358 101.060 
Jurisdictional loss EQ +9.010 - 686 -4.006 - 90 -1.082 -3.147 
Result 81.903 31.476 124.638 2.794 61.276 97.913