EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.11.2016 SWD(2016) 354 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT STATISTICAL ANNEX Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE Alert Mechanism Report 2017



(prepared in accordance with Articles 3 and 4 of Regulation

(EU) No 1176/2011 on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances) {COM(2016) 728 final}



Background information Statistical methodology improvements Improving the quality framework and ongoing work Chapter 1: Tables by year - Headline indicators Table 1.1: MIP Scoreboard 2015 Table 1.2: MIP Scoreboard 2014 Table 1.3: MIP Scoreboard 2013 Table 1.4: MIP Scoreboard 2012 Table 1.5: MIP Scoreboard 2011 Table 1.6: MIP Scoreboard 2010 Table 1.7: MIP Scoreboard 2009 Table 1.8: MIP Scoreboard 2008 Table 1.9: MIP Scoreboard 2007 Table 1.10: MIP Scoreboard 2006 Chapter 2: Tables by year - Auxiliary indicators used in the economic reading of the MIP scoreboard Table 2.1: Auxiliary indicators, 2015 Table 2.1 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2015 Table 2.2: Auxiliary indicators, 2014 Table 2.2 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2014

Table 2.3: Auxiliary indicators, 2013 Table 2.3 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2013 Table 2.4: Auxiliary indicators, 2012 Table 2.4 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2012 Table 2.5: Auxiliary indicators, 2011 Table 2.5 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2011 Table 2.6: Auxiliary indicators, 2010 Table 2.6 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2010 Table 2.7: Auxiliary indicators, 2009 Table 2.7 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2009 Table 2.8: Auxiliary indicators, 2008 Table 2.8 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2008 Table 2.9: Auxiliary indicators, 2007 Table 2.9 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2007 Table 2.10: Auxiliary indicators, 2006 Table 2.10 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2006 Chapter 3: Tables by indicator Table 3.1: Current account balance, % of GDP (3 year average) Table 3.2: Current account balance (% of GDP) Table 3.3: Net international investment position (% of GDP)

Table 3.4: Real effective exchange rate - 42 trading partners, HICP deflator (3 years % change) Table 3.5: Real effective exchange rate - 42 trading partners, HICP deflator (1 year % change) Table 3.6: Export market share - % of world exports (5 years % change) Table 3.7: Export market share - % of world exports (1 year % change) Table 3.8: Nominal unit labour cost index, 2010=100 (3 years % change) Table 3.9: Nominal unit labour cost index, 2010=100 (1 year % change) Table 3.10: House price index (2010=100), deflated (1 year % change) Table 3.11: Private sector credit flow, consolidated (% of GDP) Table 3.12: Private sector debt, consolidated (% of GDP) Table 3.13: General government gross debt (% of GDP) Table 3.14: Unemployment rate (3 year average) Table 3.15: Unemployment rate (%) Table 3.16: Total financial sector liabilities, non-consolidated (1 year % change) Table 3.17: Total financial sector liabilities, non-consolidated (Millions NC) Table 3.18: Activity rate - % of total population aged 15-64 (3 years change in p.p.) Table 3.19: Activity rate - % of total population aged 15-64 Table 3.20: Long-term unemployment rate - % of active population aged 15-74 (3 years change in p.p.) Table 3.21: Long-term unemployment rate - % of active population aged 15-74 Table 3.22: Youth unemployment rate - % of active population aged 15-24 (3 years change in p.p.) Table 3.23: Youth unemployment rate - % of active population aged 15-24

Table 3.24: Real GDP (1 year % change) Table 3.25: Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP) Table 3.26: Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (% of GDP) Table 3.27: Current plus capital account - Net lending-borrowing (% of GDP) Table 3.28: Net external debt (% of GDP) Table 3.29: Foreign direct investment in the reporting economy - flows (% of GDP) Table 3.30: Foreign direct investment in the reporting economy - stocks (% of GDP) Table 3.31: Net trade balance of energy products (% of GDP) Table 3.32: Real effective exchange rate - Euro Area trading partners (3 years % change) Table 3.33: Export performance against advanced economies (5 years % change) Table 3.34: Terms of trade (5 years % change) Table 3.35: Export market share, volume (1 year % change) Table 3.36: Real labour productivity (1 year % change) Table 3.37: Nominal unit labour cost index, 2010=100 (10 years % change) Table 3.38: Unit labour cost performance relative to EA (10 years % change) Table 3.39: House price index (2010=100) - nominal (3 years % change) Table 3.40: Residential construction (% of GDP) Table 3.41: Private sector debt, non-consolidated (% of GDP) Table 3.42: Financial sector leverage (debt-to-equity), non-consolidated (%) Table 3.43: Employment rate (1 year % change)

Table 3.44: Young people neither in employment nor in education and training - % of total population aged 15-24 Table 3.45: People at risk of poverty or social exclusion - % of total population Table 3.46: People at risk of poverty after social transfers - % of total population Table 3.47: Severely materially deprived people - % of total population Table 3.48: People living in households with very low work intensity - % of total population aged 0-59 Chapter 4: Tables by Member States - Headline indicators Table 4.1: The MIP scoreboard for Belgium Table 4.2: The MIP scoreboard for Bulgaria Table 4.3: The MIP scoreboard for Czech Republic Table 4.4: The MIP scoreboard for Denmark Table 4.5: The MIP scoreboard for Germany Table 4.6: The MIP scoreboard for Estonia Table 4.7: The MIP scoreboard for Ireland Table 4.8: The MIP scoreboard for Greece Table 4.9: The MIP scoreboard for Spain Table 4.10: The MIP scoreboard for France Table 4.11: The MIP scoreboard for Croatia Table 4.12: The MIP scoreboard for Italy Table 4.13: The MIP scoreboard for Cyprus Table 4.14: The MIP scoreboard for Latvia

Table 4.15: The MIP scoreboard for Lithuania Table 4.16: The MIP scoreboard for Luxembourg Table 4.17: The MIP scoreboard for Hungary Table 4.18: The MIP scoreboard for Malta Table 4.19: The MIP scoreboard for Netherlands Table 4.20: The MIP scoreboard for Austria Table 4.21: The MIP scoreboard for Poland Table 4.22: The MIP scoreboard for Portugal Table 4.23: The MIP scoreboard for Romania Table 4.24: The MIP scoreboard for Slovenia Table 4.25: The MIP scoreboard for Slovakia Table 4.26: The MIP scoreboard for Finland Table 4.27: The MIP scoreboard for Sweden Table 4.28: The MIP scoreboard for United Kingdom Chapter 5: Tables by Member States - Auxiliary indicators used in the economic reading of the MIP scoreboard Table 5.1: Auxiliary indicators for Belgium Table 5.1 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Belgium Table 5.2: Auxiliary indicators for Bulgaria Table 5.2 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Bulgaria Table 5.3: Auxiliary indicators for Czech Republic

Table 5.3 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Czech Republic Table 5.4: Auxiliary indicators for Denmark Table 5.4 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Denmark Table 5.5: Auxiliary indicators for Germany Table 5.5 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Germany Table 5.6: Auxiliary indicators for Estonia Table 5.6 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Estonia Table 5.7: Auxiliary indicators for Ireland Table 5.7 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Ireland Table 5.8: Auxiliary indicators for Greece Table 5.8 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Greece Table 5.9: Auxiliary indicators for Spain Table 5.9 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Spain Table 5.10: Auxiliary indicators for France Table 5.10 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for France Table 5.11: Auxiliary indicators for Croatia Table 5.11 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Croatia Table 5.12: Auxiliary indicators for Italy Table 5.12 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Italy Table 5.13: Auxiliary indicators for Cyprus

Table 5.13 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Cyprus Table 5.14: Auxiliary indicators for Latvia Table 5.14 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Latvia Table 5.15: Auxiliary indicators for Lithuania Table 5.15 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Lithuania Table 5.16: Auxiliary indicators for Luxembourg Table 5.16 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Luxembourg Table 5.17: Auxiliary indicators for Hungary Table 5.17 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Hungary Table 5.18: Auxiliary indicators for Malta Table 5.18 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Malta Table 5.19: Auxiliary indicators for Netherlands Table 5.19 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Netherlands Table 5.20: Auxiliary indicators for Austria Table 5.20 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Austria Table 5.21: Auxiliary indicators for Poland Table 5.21 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Poland Table 5.22: Auxiliary indicators for Portugal Table 5.22 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Portugal Table 5.23: Auxiliary indicators for Romania

Table 5.23 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Romania Table 5.24: Auxiliary indicators for Slovenia Table 5.24 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Slovenia Table 5.25: Auxiliary indicators for Slovakia Table 5.25 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Slovakia Table 5.26: Auxiliary indicators for Finland Table 5.26 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Finland Table 5.27: Auxiliary indicators for Sweden Table 5.27 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Sweden Table 5.28: Auxiliary indicators for United Kingdom Table 5.28 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for United Kingdom Chapter 6: Tables by year - MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) Table 6.1: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2015 Table 6.2: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2014 Table 6.3: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2013 Table 6.4: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2012 Table 6.5: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2011 Table 6.6: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2010 Table 6.7: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2009 Table 6.8: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2008

Table 6.9: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2007 Table 6.10: MIP Scoreboard (base indicators) 2006



Background information This Statistical Annex to the 2017 Alert Mechanism Report (AMR 2017) presents the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP) scoreboard indicators and auxiliary indicators used in the economic reading of the MIP scoreboard. The MIP scoreboard and auxiliary indicators are mainly compiled by Eurostat, from the data transmitted by Member States, following European legislation. The MIP scoreboard indicators are presented with their indicative thresholds (used in the AMR) while no thresholds are applied to the auxiliary indicators. The policy framework of the MIP relies on timely and high quality socio-economic and financial statistics. Since the publication of the first Statistical Annex in 2012, significant progress has been achieved towards enhancing the standards and methods used for the compilation of underlying data as well as strengthening the statistical quality assurance framework. The MIP Scoreboard consists of fourteen scoreboard indicators measuring internal and external imbalances as well as social and labour market developments. The 10-year time series of the MIP scoreboard indicators are displayed in this statistical annex in Chapter 1 (by year) and Chapter 4 (by country). Table 1 lists the MIP scoreboard indicators together with detailed information on their data sources. The cut-off date for the data, that is the date on which the data were extracted from the Eurostat database for the preparation of this document, was the 24th October 2016. For additional information about the data, please contact ESTAT-MIP@ec.europa.eu . Table 1. MIP scoreboard indicators (AMR 2017) Indicator Unit Data source Statistical domain Current account balance (% of GDP) 3 year average Eurostat BOP/NA Net international investment position % of GDP Eurostat BOP/NA Real effective exchange rate (42 trading partners, HICP deflator) 3 years % change DG ECFIN Export market share (% of world exports) 5 years % change Eurostat, IMF BOP Nominal unit labour cost index (2010=100) 3 years % change Eurostat NA House price index (2010=100), deflated 1 year % change Eurostat Price statistics / NA Private sector credit flow, consolidated % of GDP Eurostat NA (FA) Private sector debt, consolidated % of GDP Eurostat NA (FA) General government gross debt % of GDP Eurostat GFS Unemployment rate 3 year average Eurostat EU-LFS Total financial sector liabilities, non-consolidated 1 year % change Eurostat NA (FA) Activity rate (% of total population aged 15-64) 3 years change in p.p. Eurostat EU-LFS Long-term unemployment rate (% of active population aged 15-74) 3 years change in p.p. Eurostat EU-LFS Youth unemployment rate (% of active population aged 15-24) 3 years change in p.p. Eurostat EU-LFS Note: NA – National Accounts; BOP – Balance of Payments; FA – Financial Accounts; GFS – Government Finance Statistics; and LFS – Labour Force Survey/Labour Market Statistics; p.p. – percentage points Supplementing the MIP scoreboard indicators, a list of 25 auxiliary indicators (see Table 2) provides additional information on aspects linked to the general macroeconomic situation, nominal and real convergence inside and outside the European Union and the euro area, detailed data on external liabilities, including foreign direct investment and net external debt, and social statistics. The auxiliary indicators enhance the information base for understanding potential imbalances, as well as the adjustment capacity of the economy. The auxiliary indicators are also presented in this Statistical Annex by year (in Chapter 2) and by country (in Chapter 5). Table 2. MIP auxiliary indicators (AMR 2017) Indicator Unit Data source Statistical domain Real GDP 1 year % change Eurostat NA Gross fixed capital formation % of GDP Eurostat NA Gross domestic expenditure on R&D % of GDP Eurostat Business Statistics/ NA Current plus capital account (Net lending-borrowing) % of GDP Eurostat BOP/NA Net external debt % of GDP Eurostat BOP/ NA Foreign direct investment in the reporting economy – net inward flows % of GDP Eurostat BOP/NA Foreign direct investment in the reporting economy - stocks % of GDP Eurostat BOP/NA Net trade balance of energy products % of GDP Eurostat International Trade/ NA Real effective exchange rates – euro area trading partners 3 years % change DG ECFIN Export performance against advanced economies 5 years % change Eurostat/OECD BOP Terms of trade 5 years % change Eurostat NA Export market share - in volume 1 year % change Eurostat /IMF Labour productivity 1 year % change Eurostat NA Nominal unit labour cost index (2010=100) 10 years % change Eurostat NA Unit labour cost performance relative to euro area 10 years % change DG ECFIN House price index (2010=100) - nominal 3 years % change Eurostat Price statistics / NA Residential construction % of GDP Eurostat NA Private sector debt, non-consolidated % of GDP Eurostat NA (FA) Financial sector leverage, non-consolidated % debt to equity Eurostat NA (FA) Employment rate 1 year % change Eurostat NA Young people neither in employment nor in education and training % of total population aged 15-24 Eurostat EU-LFS People at risk of poverty or social exclusion % of total population Eurostat SILC People at risk of poverty after social transfers % of total population Eurostat SILC Severely materially deprived people % of total population Eurostat SILC People living in households with very low work intensity % of total population aged 0-59 Eurostat SILC Note: NA – National Accounts; BOP – Balance of Payments; FA – Financial Accounts; LFS – Labour Force Survey/Labour Market Statistics; SILC – Statistics on Income and Living Conditions; p.p. – percentage points In Chapter 3, the data is displayed for each MIP indicator separately to allow easy comparisons of Member States for the 10-year time series. In addition, in the same chapter short descriptions of the indicators as well as detailed information on data sources and methods employed for their compilation are provided. Statistical methodology improvements In 2014 the new statistical standards (the European System of Accounts, ESA 2010 and the Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition, BPM6) and improvements in the statistical production process in the Member States entered into force. The successful implementation improved the quality of the MIP underlying data. Detailed information on ESA 2010 is made available on the Eurostat website – ESA2010 web section . BOP/IIP underlying MIP indicators The revision of international standards and changeover to the 6th edition of the Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual (BPM6) was translated into new data requirements via the adoption of Commission Regulation (EU) No 555/2012 and ECB Guideline (ECB/2011/23). According to the new legislation, Member States shall submit to the Commission (Eurostat) data following the BPM6 requirements from 2014 onwards only. The length of time series available for the computation of MIP indicators based on the BPM6 is thus limited.

However, in order to maintain comparability over time, the majority of countries has back-calculated the main BOP time series according to the new standards. As the transmission of back data by Member States is voluntary, some data gaps remained for a minority of countries. In order to enlarge data coverage and support policy analysis, Eurostat has taken measures in close cooperation with Member States to improve the situation with regard to the availability of BOP/IIP back data. As a result, data coverage for the ten years timespan needed for this year's Statistical Annex (2006-2015), improved considerably. Moreover, Eurostat has complemented Member States efforts by producing some estimates which were then approved by the concerned Member State. Thanks to those efforts, coverage has substantially increased, reaching full coverage for the Net international investment position and only one value missing for the three years average of the Current account balance. The only indicator where some past values are missing for years before 2010 is the Export market shares, mainly due to its definition which requires five years longer time series. Table 3 below summarise the improvement in coverage of the three Balance of Payments indicators. Table 3. Data coverage of the three BOP headline indicators for ten annual values (in %) Indicator BPM6 data coverage 2015 2016 Current account balance (% of GDP) – 3 years backward moving average 90.0 99.6 Net international investment position – % of GDP 91.1 100.0 Export market shares (% of world exports) – 5 years % change 78.9 96.8 Following the adoption of the new statistical standards and according to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 555/2012 , which entered into force on January 2014, some BOP series have been discontinued. Therefore, values for the MIP auxiliary indicator on Net external debt could not be made available for some countries (see Chapter 3, Table 3.28) neither according the BPM5 nor the BPM6 methodology. Additional changes in 2016 Ireland’s Central Statistics Office (CSO) released on 12 July 2016 the new national accounts for 2015 with a large upward level shift of GDP by 26.3%. This was primarily due to the relocation to Ireland of a limited number of big economic operators and can be seen as an effect of increasing globalisation. This resulted not only in substantial changes to the indicators expressed as GDP ratios for 2015, but also affected other indicators, such as unit labour costs.

The level shift of GDP was consistent with the revision of BOP data largely on the back of higher net exports. Reflecting the large revision of net exports, the current account surplus was revised upward to 10.2% of GDP from 4.4% of GDP. The recording of new large direct and portfolio investments led to a significant deterioration of Ireland’s negative net international investment position (NIIP) to -208.0% of GDP from 69.6% of GDP. In the context of ESA 2010 implementation, Hungary is refining its method of consolidating the data for non-financial corporations, specifically for holding-like units inside large resident corporation groups. This has a significant downward impact on the values for private debt and private credit flow. In the domain of Financial Accounts Germany has revised its compilation of the monetary financial institutions, with an impact on the total financial sector liabilities indicator. Bulgaria has reclassified various enterprises between the institutional sectors of the economy, with an impact on private sector debt and credit flow, and total financial sector liabilities. For Estonia, some methodological improvements have been made to the data for 2011-2015 but not for earlier years. The United Kingdom published in June 2016 a new House Price Index (HPI) which is calculated using new administrative data sources and methodology. The new HPI offers now full coverage of the UK housing market, improving on the previous ONS HPI which was calculated using only mortgage transactions. The new HPI also introduces improved methodology to address limitations with the previous house price indices published by Land Registry and ONS. Ireland's house price index was revised in September 2016 principally because the data source has changed. Previously, the house price index was based on mortgage transaction data. Now the house price index is based on Stamp Duty returns matched with Building Energy Rating data, a national database of buildings and census small area population statistics. These new data sources extend the coverage of the house price index to cover all transactions in the state, mortgage-based and cash-based. From 2014 France started extending the Labour Force Survey (LFS) to the new regions of Guadeloupe, Martinique, Guyane, La Réunion, and Mayotte. Due to the different situation of the labour market in these regions, breaks in the time series of the MIP indicators calculated on the LFS data may occur. The transition is not yet complete and not all indicators are available for the last 12 years according to the new geographical definitions. Therefore the dissemination policy will differ among indicators depending on the availability of data according to the new definitions and the availability of back calculated series. Unemployment (by age groups) is available only for France including the additional regions, and back calculations are made available. As a consequence, and in line with last year's edition, the only option is to use the definition including DROM for both MIP indicators unemployment rate and youth unemployment rate. However, for active population and long-term unemployment back calculated data are not available. Here the only option is to publish MIP activity rate and long term unemployment rate according to the old geographical definition. The activity rate for metropolitan France in 2015 was 71.5%, the same indicator for France including the additional regions was 71.3%. General Government Gross Debt data notified for the years 2012 to 2015 have been released on the 21st October 2016 within the EDP notification; Eurostat expressed reservations on reported data of Cyprus, Belgium and Hungary. For more information on reservations and main revisions between the April 2016 and the October 2016 notifications please see the latest EDP news release . Improving the quality framework and ongoing work The credibility of the MIP and its smooth implementation depends critically on the availability and quality of the MIP relevant statistics. The statistics used in the procedure have to be fit for the purpose, reliable and comparable among Member States and in time. For that reason, the scoreboard indicators are regularly reviewed; the underlying statistical methodology and the statistical production processes are constantly improved. On several occasions since 2011 the ECOFIN Council invited the Commission (Eurostat) to take all necessary initiatives to assure a reliable procedure for the compilation of these indicators as well as a continuous improvement of the underlying statistical information. At the same time, the Council invited the European Statistical System (ESS) and the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) to work together on improving underlying statistics and to ensure their comparability.

The statistics underlying the MIP indicators are based on EU legislation but compiled by the European Statistical System (ESS) and the European System of Central Banks (ESCB).

Following the three-level approach providing the frame for the work on quality assurance of the MIP indicators, in 2016 the following actions were performed: Level 1: Preparation of an annual ESS-ESCB quality assessment report on MIP statistics by Eurostat and the ECB aimed at policy makers and the public at large addressing the reliability and comparability of the MIP related statistics and actions to address most relevant quality issues (second report prepared in 2016) Level 2: Outline of the harmonization of the existing Quality Reports on Balance of Payments/International Investment Position produced by the ESS and the ESCB taking into account MIP requirements. In the area of National Accounts, a draft Commission Implementing Regulation on the modalities, structure, periodicity and assessment indicators of the quality reports on data transmitted under Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 is under consultation with a view of its adoption by the end of 2016. In addition the Commission (DG ECFIN), in its capacity as the compiler of the Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) indicator, publishes quality information on real effective exchange rate indicators on its website and a level 2 quality report on the Labour Force Survey is available on the Eurostat website. Level 3: Development of condensed country specific self-assessment reports on the quality and statistical processes for statistics underlying the MIP indicators which are easily understandable by users. They should provide the basis for assuring the quality of the statistics and their comparability between countries. Member States are encouraged to publish such reports. In 2016 information for the statistical domains Balance of Payments, Financial Accounts, Housing Price statistics and the Labour Force Survey have been prepared for at least 27 countries. Technical work has been undertaken to facilitate the implementation of the ESA 2010 country quality reports in 2017. Chapter 1: Tables by year - Headline indicators Table 1.1: MIP Scoreboard 2015



Table 1.2: MIP Scoreboard 2014



Table 1.3: MIP Scoreboard 2013



Table 1.4: MIP Scoreboard 2012



Table 1.5: MIP Scoreboard 2011



Table 1.6: MIP Scoreboard 2010



Table 1.7: MIP Scoreboard 2009





Table 1.8: MIP Scoreboard 2008



Table 1.9: MIP Scoreboard 2007



Table 1.10: MIP Scoreboard 2006



Chapter 2: Tables by year - Auxiliary indicators used in the economic reading of the MIP scoreboard Table 2.1: Auxiliary indicators, 2015 Table 2.1 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2015



Table 2.2: Auxiliary indicators, 2014



Table 2.2 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2014



Table 2.3: Auxiliary indicators, 2013



Table 2.3 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2013





Table 2.4: Auxiliary indicators, 2012



Table 2.4 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2012



Table 2.5: Auxiliary indicators, 2011



Table 2.5 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2011



Table 2.6: Auxiliary indicators, 2010



Table 2.6 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2010



Table 2.7: Auxiliary indicators, 2009



Table 2.7 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2009



Table 2.8: Auxiliary indicators, 2008



Table 2.8 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2008





Table 2.9: Auxiliary indicators, 2007



Table 2.9 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2007



Table 2.10: Auxiliary indicators, 2006



Table 2.10 (continued): Auxiliary indicators, 2006



Chapter 3: Tables by indicator Table 3.1: Current account balance, % of GDP (3 year average)



Table 3.2: Current account balance (% of GDP)



Table 3.3: Net international investment position (% of GDP)



Table 3.4: Real effective exchange rate - 42 trading partners, HICP deflator (3 years % change)



Table 3.5: Real effective exchange rate - 42 trading partners, HICP deflator (1 year % change)





Table 3.6: Export market share - % of world exports (5 years % change)



Table 3.7: Export market share - % of world exports (1 year % change)



Table 3.8: Nominal unit labour cost index, 2010=100 (3 years % change)



Table 3.9: Nominal unit labour cost index, 2010=100 (1 year % change)



Table 3.10: House price index (2010=100), deflated (1 year % change)



Table 3.11: Private sector credit flow, consolidated (% of GDP)



Table 3.12: Private sector debt, consolidated (% of GDP)



Table 3.13: General government gross debt (% of GDP)



Table 3.14: Unemployment rate (3 year average)



Table 3.15: Unemployment rate (%)





Table 3.16: Total financial sector liabilities, non-consolidated (1 year % change)



Table 3.17: Total financial sector liabilities, non-consolidated (Millions NC)



Table 3.18: Activity rate - % of total population aged 15-64 (3 years change in p.p.)



Table 3.19: Activity rate - % of total population aged 15-64



Table 3.20: Long-term unemployment rate - % of active population aged 15-74 (3 years change in p.p.)



Table 3.21: Long-term unemployment rate - % of active population aged 15-74



Table 3.22: Youth unemployment rate - % of active population aged 15-24 (3 years change in p.p.)



Table 3.23: Youth unemployment rate - % of active population aged 15-24



Table 3.24: Real GDP (1 year % change)



Table 3.25: Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP)





Table 3.26: Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (% of GDP)



Table 3.27: Current plus capital account - Net lending-borrowing (% of GDP)



Table 3.28: Net external debt (% of GDP)



Table 3.29: Foreign direct investment in the reporting economy - flows (% of GDP)



Table 3.30: Foreign direct investment in the reporting economy - stocks (% of GDP)



Table 3.31: Net trade balance of energy products (% of GDP)



Table 3.32: Real effective exchange rate - Euro Area trading partners (3 years % change)



Table 3.33: Export performance against advanced economies (5 years % change)



Table 3.34: Terms of trade (5 years % change)



Table 3.35: Export market share, volume (1 year % change)





Table 3.36: Real labour productivity (1 year % change)



Table 3.37: Nominal unit labour cost index, 2010=100 (10 years % change)



Table 3.38: Unit labour cost performance relative to EA (10 years % change)



Table 3.39: House price index (2010=100) - nominal (3 years % change)



Table 3.40: Residential construction (% of GDP)



Table 3.41: Private sector debt, non-consolidated (% of GDP)



Table 3.42: Financial sector leverage (debt-to-equity), non-consolidated (%)



Table 3.43: Employment rate (1 year % change)



Table 3.44: Young people neither in employment nor in education and training - % of total population aged 15-24



Table 3.45: People at risk of poverty or social exclusion - % of total population





Table 3.46: People at risk of poverty after social transfers - % of total population



Table 3.47: Severely materially deprived people - % of total population



Table 3.48: People living in households with very low work intensity - % of total population aged 0-59



Chapter 4: Tables by Member States - Headline indicators Table 4.1: The MIP scoreboard for Belgium



Table 4.2: The MIP scoreboard for Bulgaria



Table 4.3: The MIP scoreboard for Czech Republic



Table 4.4: The MIP scoreboard for Denmark



Table 4.5: The MIP scoreboard for Germany



Table 4.6: The MIP scoreboard for Estonia





Table 4.7: The MIP scoreboard for Ireland



Table 4.8: The MIP scoreboard for Greece



Table 4.9: The MIP scoreboard for Spain



Table 4.10: The MIP scoreboard for France



Table 4.11: The MIP scoreboard for Croatia



Table 4.12: The MIP scoreboard for Italy



Table 4.13: The MIP scoreboard for Cyprus



Table 4.14: The MIP scoreboard for Latvia



Table 4.15: The MIP scoreboard for Lithuania



Table 4.16: The MIP scoreboard for Luxembourg





Table 4.17: The MIP scoreboard for Hungary



Table 4.18: The MIP scoreboard for Malta



Table 4.19: The MIP scoreboard for Netherlands



Table 4.20: The MIP scoreboard for Austria



Table 4.21: The MIP scoreboard for Poland



Table 4.22: The MIP scoreboard for Portugal



Table 4.23: The MIP scoreboard for Romania



Table 4.24: The MIP scoreboard for Slovenia



Table 4.25: The MIP scoreboard for Slovakia



Table 4.26: The MIP scoreboard for Finland





Table 4.27: The MIP scoreboard for Sweden



Table 4.28: The MIP scoreboard for United Kingdom



Chapter 5: Tables by Member States - Auxiliary indicators used in the economic reading of the MIP scoreboard Table 5.1: Auxiliary indicators for Belgium



Table 5.1 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Belgium



Table 5.2: Auxiliary indicators for Bulgaria



Table 5.2 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Bulgaria



Table 5.3: Auxiliary indicators for Czech Republic



Table 5.3 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Czech Republic



Table 5.4: Auxiliary indicators for Denmark





Table 5.4 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Denmark



Table 5.5: Auxiliary indicators for Germany



Table 5.5 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Germany



Table 5.6: Auxiliary indicators for Estonia



Table 5.6 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Estonia



Table 5.7: Auxiliary indicators for Ireland



Table 5.7 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Ireland



Table 5.8: Auxiliary indicators for Greece



Table 5.8 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Greece



Table 5.9: Auxiliary indicators for Spain





Table 5.9 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Spain



Table 5.10: Auxiliary indicators for France



Table 5.10 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for France



Table 5.11: Auxiliary indicators for Croatia



Table 5.11 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Croatia



Table 5.12: Auxiliary indicators for Italy



Table 5.12 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Italy



Table 5.13: Auxiliary indicators for Cyprus



Table 5.13 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Cyprus



Table 5.14: Auxiliary indicators for Latvia





Table 5.14 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Latvia



Table 5.15: Auxiliary indicators for Lithuania



Table 5.15 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Lithuania



Table 5.16: Auxiliary indicators for Luxembourg



Table 5.16 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Luxembourg



Table 5.17: Auxiliary indicators for Hungary



Table 5.17 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Hungary



Table 5.18: Auxiliary indicators for Malta



Table 5.18 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Malta



Table 5.19: Auxiliary indicators for Netherlands





Table 5.19 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Netherlands



Table 5.20: Auxiliary indicators for Austria



Table 5.20 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Austria



Table 5.21: Auxiliary indicators for Poland



Table 5.21 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Poland



Table 5.22: Auxiliary indicators for Portugal



Table 5.22 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Portugal



Table 5.23: Auxiliary indicators for Romania



Table 5.23 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Romania



Table 5.24: Auxiliary indicators for Slovenia





Table 5.24 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Slovenia



Table 5.25: Auxiliary indicators for Slovakia



Table 5.25 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Slovakia



Table 5.26: Auxiliary indicators for Finland



Table 5.26 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Finland



Table 5.27: Auxiliary indicators for Sweden



Table 5.27 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for Sweden



Table 5.28: Auxiliary indicators for United Kingdom



Table 5.28 (continued): Auxiliary indicators for United Kingdom



Chapter 6: Tables by year - MIP Scoreboard (base indicators)