P8_TA(2019)0096

Common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those ***I

Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 13 February 2019 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (COM(2018)0375 — C8-0230/2018 — 2018/0196(COD)) (1)

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

(2020/C 449/50)

Amendment 1

Proposal for a regulation

Title

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Proposal for a Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument

Amendment 2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) provides that, in order to strengthen its economic, social and territorial cohesion, the Union is to aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions or islands, and that particular attention is to be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps. Article 175 of the TFEU requires that the Union is to support the achievement of these objectives by the action it takes through the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section, the European Social Fund, the European Regional Development Fund, the European Investment Bank and other instruments. Article 322 of the TFEU provides the basis for adopting financial rules determining the procedure to be adopted for establishing and implementing the budget and for presenting and auditing accounts, as well as for checks on the responsibility of financial actors. (1) Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) provides that, in order to strengthen its economic, social and territorial cohesion, the Union is to aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions or islands, and that particular attention is to be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps . These regions particularly benefit from cohesion policy . Article 175 of the TFEU requires that the Union is to support the achievement of these objectives by the action it takes through the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section, the European Social Fund, the European Regional Development Fund, the European Investment Bank and other instruments. Article 322 of the TFEU provides the basis for adopting financial rules determining the procedure to be adopted for establishing and implementing the budget and for presenting and auditing accounts, as well as for checks on the responsibility of financial actors.

Amendment 3

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1 a) It is important for the future of the European Union and its citizens that cohesion policy remains the main investment policy of the Union, keeping its funding in the 2021-2027 period at least at the level of the 2014-2020 programming period. New funding for other areas of activity or programmes of the Union should not be to the detriment of the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus or the Cohesion Fund.

Amendment 430

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) In order to further develop a coordinated and harmonised implementation of Union Funds implemented under shared management namely the European Regional Development Fund (‘ERDF’), the European Social Fund Plus (‘ESF+’), the Cohesion Fund, measures financed under shared management in the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (‘EMFF’), the Asylum and Migration Fund (‘AMIF’), Internal Security Fund (‘ISF’) and Integrated Border Management Fund (‘BMVI’), financial rules based on Article 322 of the TFEU should be established for all these Funds (‘the Funds’), clearly specifying the scope of application of the relevant provisions. In addition, common provisions based on Article 177 of the TFEU should be established to cover policy specific rules for the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the EMFF. (2) In order to further develop a coordinated and harmonised implementation of Union Funds implemented under shared management namely the European Regional Development Fund (‘ERDF’), the European Social Fund Plus (‘ESF+’), the Cohesion Fund, measures financed under shared management in the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (‘EMFF’), the Asylum and Migration Fund (‘AMIF’), Internal Security Fund (‘ISF’) and Integrated Border Management Fund (‘BMVI’), financial rules based on Article 322 of the TFEU should be established for all these Funds (‘the Funds’), clearly specifying the scope of application of the relevant provisions. In addition, common provisions based on Article 177 of the TFEU should be established to cover policy specific rules for the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund, the EMFF and to a specific extent the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) .

Amendment 5

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (4) The outermost regions and the northern sparsely populated regions should benefit from specific measures and from additional funding pursuant to Article 349 of the TFEU and Article 2 of Protocol No 6 to the 1994 Act of Accession. (4) The outermost regions and the northern sparsely populated regions should benefit from specific measures and from additional funding pursuant to Article 349 of the TFEU and Article 2 of Protocol No 6 to the 1994 Act of Accession in order to address their specific disadvantages related to their geographic location .

Amendment 6

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (5) Horizontal principles as set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on the European Union (‘TEU’) and in Article 10 of the TFEU, including principles of subsidiarity and proportionality as set out in Article 5 of the TEU should be respected in the implementation of the Funds, taking into account the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Member States should also respect the obligations of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and ensure accessibility in line with its article 9 and in accordance with the Union law harmonising accessibility requirements for products and services. Member States and the Commission should aim at eliminating inequalities and at promoting equality between men and women and integrating the gender perspective, as well as at combating discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. The Funds should not support actions that contribute to any form of segregation. The objectives of the Funds should be pursued in the framework of sustainable development and the Union's promotion of the aim of preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment as set out in Article 11 and Article 191(1) of the TFEU, taking into account the polluter pays principle. In order to protect the integrity of the internal market, operations benefitting undertakings shall comply with Union State aid rules as set out in Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU. (5) Horizontal principles as set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on the European Union (‘TEU’) and in Article 10 of the TFEU, including principles of subsidiarity and proportionality as set out in Article 5 of the TEU should be respected in the implementation of the Funds, taking into account the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Member States should also respect the obligations of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and ensure accessibility in line with its article 9 and in accordance with the Union law harmonising accessibility requirements for products and services . In that context, the Funds should be implemented in a way which promotes deinstitutionalisation and community-based care . Member States and the Commission should aim at eliminating inequalities and at promoting equality between men and women and integrating the gender perspective, as well as at combating discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. The Funds should not support actions that contribute to any form of segregation or exclusion, or support infrastructure which is inaccessible to persons with a disability . The objectives of the Funds should be pursued in the framework of sustainable development and the Union's promotion of the aim of preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment as set out in Article 11 and Article191(1) of the TFEU, taking into account the polluter pays principle and taking into account the commitments agreed under the Paris Agreement . In order to protect the integrity of the internal market, operations benefitting undertakings shall comply with Union State aid rules as set out in Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU. Poverty is one of the greatest challenges of the EU. The Funds should therefore contribute to the elimination of poverty. They should also contribute to fulfilling the commitment of the Union and its Member States to achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.

Amendment 7

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (9) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the Funds will contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 25 % of the EU budget expenditure supporting climate objectives. (9) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the Funds will contribute to mainstreaming climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 30 % of the EU budget expenditure supporting climate objectives. Climate proofing mechanisms should be an integral part of programming and implementation.

Amendment 8

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 9 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (9a) Given the impact of migration flows from third countries, cohesion policy should contribute to integration processes, in particular by providing infrastructure support to towns and cities and local and regional authorities on the front line, which are more involved in implementing integration policies.

Amendment 9

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 10

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (10) Part of the budget of the Union allocated to the Funds should be implemented by the Commission under shared management with Member States within the meaning of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [number of the new Financial Regulation] of the European Parliament and of the Council (12) (the ‘Financial Regulation’). Therefore, when implementing the Funds under shared management, the Commission and the Member States should respect the principles referred to in the Financial Regulation, such as sound financial management, transparency and non-discrimination. (10) Part of the budget of the Union allocated to the Funds should be implemented by the Commission under shared management with Member States within the meaning of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [number of the new Financial Regulation] of the European Parliament and of the Council (12) (the ‘Financial Regulation’). Therefore, when implementing the Funds under shared management, the Commission and the Member States should respect the principles referred to in the Financial Regulation, such as sound financial management, transparency and non-discrimination. Member States should be responsible for preparing and implementing programmes. This should take place at the appropriate territorial level, in accordance with their institutional, legal and financial framework, and by the bodies designated by them for that purpose. Member States should refrain from adding rules that complicate the use of the funds for beneficiaries.

Amendment 10

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 11

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (11) The principle of partnership is a key feature in the implementation of the Funds, building on the multi-level governance approach and ensuring the involvement of civil society and social partners. In order to provide continuity in the organisation of partnership, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014 should continue to apply (13). (11) The principle of partnership is a key feature in the implementation of the Funds, building on the multi-level governance approach and ensuring the involvement of regional, local, and other public authorities, civil society and social partners. In order to provide continuity in the organisation of partnership, the Commission should be empowered to amend and adapt Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014 (13).

Amendment 11

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 12

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (12) At Union level, the European Semester of economic policy coordination is the framework to identify national reform priorities and monitor their implementation. Member States develop their own national multiannual investment strategies in support of these reform priorities. These strategies should be presented alongside the yearly National Reform Programmes as a way to outline and coordinate priority investment projects to be supported by national and Union funding. They should also serve to use Union funding in a coherent manner and to maximise the added value of the financial support to be received notably from the Funds, the European Investment Stabilisation Function and InvestEU. deleted

Amendment 12

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 13

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (13) Member States should determine how relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) of the TFEU and relevant Council recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 148(4) of the TFEU (‘CSR’s) are taken into account in the preparation of programming documents. During the 2021–2027 programming period (‘programming period’), Member States should regularly present to the monitoring committee and to the Commission the progress in implementing the programmes in support of the CSRs. During a mid-term review, Member States should, among other elements, consider the need for programme modifications to accommodate relevant CSRs adopted or modified since the start of the programming period. (13) Member States should take into account relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) of the TFEU and relevant Council recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 148(4) of the TFEU (‘CSR’s) in the preparation of programming documents, where they are consistent with the programme’s objectives. During the 2021–2027 programming period (‘programming period’), Member States should regularly present to the monitoring committee and to the Commission the progress in implementing the programmes in support of the CSRs , as well as of the European Pillar of Social Rights . During a mid-term review, Member States should, among other elements, consider the need for programme modifications to accommodate relevant CSRs adopted or modified since the start of the programming period.

Amendment 13

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 14

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (14) Member States should take account of the contents of their draft National Energy and Climate Plan, to be developed under the Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union (14) , and the outcome of the process resulting in Union recommendations regarding these plans, for their programmes, as well as for the financial needs allocated for low-carbon investments. (14) Member States should take account of the contents of their draft National Energy and Climate Plan, to be developed under the Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union (14) , and the outcome of the process resulting in Union recommendations regarding these plans, for their programmes, including during the mid-term review, as well as for the financial needs allocated for low-carbon investments.

Amendment 14

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (15) The Partnership Agreement, prepared by each Member State, should be a strategic document guiding the negotiations between the Commission and the Member State concerned on the design of programmes. In order to reduce the administrative burden, it should not be necessary to amend Partnership Agreements during the programming period. To facilitate the programming and avoid overlapping content in programming documents, Partnership Agreements can be included as part of a programme. (15) The Partnership Agreement, prepared by each Member State, should be a strategic document guiding the negotiations between the Commission and the Member State concerned on the design of programmes. In order to reduce the administrative burden, it should not be necessary to amend Partnership Agreements during the programming period. To facilitate the programming and avoid overlapping content in programming documents, it should be possible for Partnership Agreements to be included as part of a programme.

Amendment 15

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 16

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (16) Each Member State should have the flexibility to contribute to InvestEU for the provision of budgetary guarantees for investments in that Member State. (16) Each Member State could have the flexibility to contribute to InvestEU for the provision of budgetary guarantees for investments in that Member State , under certain conditions specified in Article 10 of this Regulation .

Amendment 16

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 17

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (17) To ensure the necessary prerequisites for the effective and efficient use of Union support granted by the Funds, a limited list of enabling conditions as well as a concise and exhaustive set of objective criteria for their assessment should be established. Each enabling condition should be linked to a specific objective and should be automatically applicable where the specific objective is selected for support. Where those conditions are not fulfilled, expenditure related to operations under the related specific objectives should not be included in payment applications.. In order to maintain a favourable investment framework, the continued fulfilment of the enabling conditions should be monitored regularly. It is also important to ensure that operations selected for support are implemented consistently with the strategies and planning documents in place underlying the fulfilled enabling conditions, thus ensuring that all co-financed operations are in line with the Union policy framework. (17) To ensure the necessary prerequisites for the inclusive, non-discriminatory, effective and efficient use of Union support granted by the Funds, a limited list of enabling conditions as well as a concise and exhaustive set of objective criteria for their assessment should be established. Each enabling condition should be linked to a specific objective and should be automatically applicable where the specific objective is selected for support. Where those conditions are not fulfilled, expenditure related to operations under the related specific objectives should not be included in payment applications.. In order to maintain a favourable investment framework, the continued fulfilment of the enabling conditions should be monitored regularly. It is also important to ensure that operations selected for support are implemented consistently with the strategies and planning documents in place underlying the fulfilled enabling conditions, thus ensuring that all co-financed operations are in line with the Union policy framework.

Amendment 17

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 18

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (18) Member States should establish a performance framework for each programme covering all indicators, milestones and targets to monitor, report on and evaluate programme performance. (18) Member States should establish a performance framework for each programme covering all indicators, milestones and targets to monitor, report on and evaluate programme performance. This should allow project selection and evaluation to be result-driven.

Amendment 18

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (19) The Member State should carry out a mid-term review of each programme supported by the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund. That review should provide a fully-fledged adjustment of programmes based on programme performance, while also providing an opportunity to take account of new challenges and relevant CSRs issued in 2024. In parallel, in 2024 the Commission should, together with the technical adjustment for the year 2025, review all Member States’ total allocations under the Investment for jobs and growth goal of cohesion policy for the years 2025, 2026 and 2027, applying the allocation method set out in the relevant basic act. That review together with the outcome of the mid-term review should result in programme amendments modifying the financial allocations for the years 2025, 2026 and 2027. (19) The Member State should carry out a mid-term review of each programme supported by the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund. That review should provide a fully-fledged adjustment of programmes based on programme performance, while also providing an opportunity to take account of new challenges and relevant CSRs issued in 2024 , as well as progress with the National Energy and Climate Plans and the European Pillar of Social Rights. Demographic challenges should also be taken into account . In parallel, in 2024 the Commission should, together with the technical adjustment for the year 2025, review all Member States’ total allocations under the Investment for jobs and growth goal of cohesion policy for the years 2025, 2026 and 2027, applying the allocation method set out in the relevant basic act. That review together with the outcome of the mid-term review should result in programme amendments modifying the financial allocations for the years 2025, 2026 and 2027.

Amendments 425/rev, 444/rev, 448 and 469

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 20

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (20) Mechanisms to ensure a link between Union funding policies and the economic governance of the Union should be further refined, allowing the Commission to make a proposal to the Council to suspend all or part of the commitments for one or more of the programmes of the Member State concerned where that Member State fails to take effective action in the context of the economic governance process. In order to ensure uniform implementation and in view of the importance of the financial effects of measures being imposed, implementing powers should be conferred on the Council which should act on the basis of a Commission proposal. To facilitate the adoption of decisions which are required to ensure effective action in the context of the economic governance process, reversed qualified majority voting should be used. deleted

Amendment 20

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 20 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (20 a) Member States could make in duly justified cases a request for flexibility within the current framework of the Stability and Growth Pact for the public or equivalent structural expenditure, supported by the public administration by way of co-financing of investments activated as part of European Structural and Investment Funds (‘ESI Funds’). The Commission should carefully assess the respective request, when defining the fiscal adjustment under either the preventive or the corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact.

Amendment 21

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 22 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (22 a) Major projects represent a substantial share of Union spending and are frequently of strategic importance with respect to the achievement of the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. It is therefore justified that operations above certain thresholds continue to be subject to specific approval procedures under this Regulation. The threshold should be established in relation to total eligible cost after taking account of expected net revenues. To ensure clarity, it is appropriate to define the content of a major project application for such a purpose. The application should contain the necessary information to provide assurance that the financial contribution from the Funds does not result in a substantial loss of jobs in existing locations within the Union. The Member State should submit all required information and the Commission should appraise the major project to determine whether the requested financial contribution is justified.

Amendment 22

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 23

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (23) To strengthen the integrated territorial development approach, investments in the form of territorial tools such as integrated territorial investments (‘ITI’), community-led local development (‘CLLD’) or any other territorial tool under policy objective ‘a Europe closer to citizens’ supporting initiatives designed by the Member State for investments programmed for the ERDF should be based on territorial and local development strategies. For the purposes of ITIs and territorial tools designed by Member States, minimum requirements should be set out for the content of territorial strategies. Those territorial strategies should be developed and endorsed under the responsibility of relevant authorities or bodies. To ensure the involvement of relevant authorities or bodies in implementing territorial strategies, those authorities or bodies should be responsible for the selection of operations to be supported, or involved in that selection. (23) To strengthen the integrated territorial development approach, investments in the form of territorial tools such as integrated territorial investments (‘ITI’), community-led local development (‘CLLD’ , known as ‘ LEADER ’ under the EAFRD), or any other territorial tool under policy objective ‘a Europe closer to citizens’ supporting initiatives designed by the Member State for investments programmed for the ERDF should be based on territorial and local development strategies . The same should apply to related initiatives such as the Smart Villages . For the purposes of ITIs and territorial tools designed by Member States, minimum requirements should be set out for the content of territorial strategies. Those territorial strategies should be developed and endorsed under the responsibility of relevant authorities or bodies. To ensure the involvement of relevant authorities or bodies in implementing territorial strategies, those authorities or bodies should be responsible for the selection of operations to be supported, or involved in that selection.

Amendment 23

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 24

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (24) To better mobilise potential at the local level, it is necessary to strengthen and facilitate CLLD. It should take into account local needs and potential, as well as relevant socio-cultural characteristics, and should provide for structural changes, build community capacity and stimulate innovation. The close cooperation and integrated use of the Funds to deliver local development strategies should be strengthened. Local action groups, representing the interests of the community, should be, as an essential principle responsible for the design and implementation of CLLD strategies. In order to facilitate coordinated support from different Funds to CLLD strategies and to facilitate their implementation, the use of a ‘Lead Fund’ approach should be facilitated. (24) To better mobilise potential at the local level, it is necessary to strengthen and facilitate CLLD. It should take into account local needs and potential, as well as relevant socio-cultural characteristics, and should provide for structural changes, build community and administrative capacity and stimulate innovation. The close cooperation and integrated use of the Funds to deliver local development strategies should be strengthened. Local action groups, representing the interests of the community, should be, as an essential principle responsible for the design and implementation of CLLD strategies. In order to facilitate coordinated support from different Funds to CLLD strategies and to facilitate their implementation, the use of a ‘Lead Fund’ approach should be facilitated.

Amendment 24

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 25

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (25) In order to reduce the administrative burden, technical assistance at the initiative of the Member State should be implemented through a flat rate based on progress in programme implementation. That technical assistance may be complemented with targeted administrative capacity building measures using reimbursement methods that are not linked to costs. Actions and deliverables as well as corresponding Union payments can be agreed in a roadmap and can lead to payments for results on the ground. (25) In order to reduce the administrative burden, technical assistance at the initiative of the Member State should be implemented through a flat rate based on progress in programme implementation. That technical assistance may be complemented with targeted administrative capacity building measures , such as the evaluation of the skills set of human resources, using reimbursement methods that are not linked to costs. Actions and deliverables as well as corresponding Union payments can be agreed in a roadmap and can lead to payments for results on the ground.

Amendment 25

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 27

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (27) In order to examine the performance of the programmes, the Member State should set up monitoring committees. For the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund, annual implementation reports should be replaced by an annual structured policy dialogue based on the latest information and data on programme implementation made available by the Member State. (27) In order to examine the performance of the programmes, the Member State should set up monitoring committees , consisting also of representatives of civil society and social partners . For the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund, annual implementation reports should be replaced by an annual structured policy dialogue based on the latest information and data on programme implementation made available by the Member State.

Amendment 26

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 28

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (28) Pursuant to paragraphs 22 and 23 of the Inter-institutional agreement for Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 (16), there is a need to evaluate the Funds on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring requirements, while avoiding overregulation and administrative burden, in particular on Member States. These requirements, where appropriate, can include measurable indicators, as a basis for evaluating the effects of the Funds on the ground. (28) Pursuant to paragraphs 22 and 23 of the Inter-institutional agreement for Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 (16), there is a need to evaluate the Funds on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring requirements, while avoiding overregulation and administrative burden, in particular on Member States. These requirements, where appropriate, can include measurable indicators, as a basis for evaluating the effects of the Funds on the ground. Indicators should be developed in a gender sensitive manner when possible.

Amendment 27

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 29

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (29) To ensure availability of comprehensive up-to-date information on programme implementation, more frequent electronic reporting on quantitative data should be required. (29) To ensure availability of comprehensive up-to-date information on programme implementation, effective and timely electronic reporting on quantitative data should be required.

Amendment 28

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 30

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (30) In order to support the preparation of related programmes and activities of the next programming period, the Commission should carry out a mid-term assessment of the Funds. At the end of the programming period, the Commission should carry out retrospective evaluations of the Funds, which should focus on the impact of the Funds. (30) In order to support the preparation of related programmes and activities of the next programming period, the Commission should carry out a mid-term assessment of the Funds. At the end of the programming period, the Commission should carry out retrospective evaluations of the Funds, which should focus on the impact of the Funds. The results of these evaluations should be made public.

Amendment 29

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 34

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (34) As regards grants provided to beneficiaries, Member States should increasingly make use of simplified cost options. The threshold linked to the obligatory use of simplified cost options should be linked to the total costs of the operation in order to ensure the same treatment of all operations below the threshold, regardless of whether the support is public or private. (34) As regards grants provided to beneficiaries, Member States should increasingly make use of simplified cost options. The threshold linked to the obligatory use of simplified cost options should be linked to the total costs of the operation in order to ensure the same treatment of all operations below the threshold, regardless of whether the support is public or private. Where a Member State intends to propose the use of a simplified cost option, it could consult the monitoring committee.

Amendment 30

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 36

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (36) In order to optimise the uptake of co-financed environmental investments, synergies should be ensured with the LIFE programme for Environmental and Climate Action, in particular through LIFE strategic integrated projects and strategic nature projects. (36) In order to optimise the uptake of co-financed environmental investments, synergies should be ensured with the LIFE programme for Environmental and Climate Action, in particular through LIFE strategic integrated projects and strategic nature projects , as well as with projects funded under Horizon Europe and other Union programmes .

Amendment 31

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 38

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (38) To ensure the effectiveness, fairness and sustainable impact of the Funds, there should be provisions guaranteeing that investments in infrastructure or productive investment are long-lasting and prevent the Funds from being used to undue advantage. Managing authorities should pay particular attention not to support relocation when selecting operations and to treat sums unduly paid to operations not complying with the requirement of durability as irregularities. (38) To ensure the inclusiveness, effectiveness, fairness and sustainable impact of the Funds, there should be provisions guaranteeing that investments in infrastructure or productive investment are non-discriminatory and long-lasting and prevent the Funds from being used to undue advantage. Managing authorities should pay particular attention not to support relocation when selecting operations and to treat sums unduly paid to operations not complying with the requirement of durability as irregularities.

Amendment 32

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 40

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (40) In order to optimise the added value from investments funded wholly or in part through the budget of the Union, synergies should be sought in particular between the Funds and directly managed instruments, including the Reform Delivery Tool. Those synergies should be achieved through key mechanisms, namely the recognition of flat rates for eligible costs from Horizon Europe for a similar operation and the possibility of combining funding from different Union instruments in the same operation as long as double financing is avoided. This Regulation should therefore set out rules for complementary financing from the Funds. (40) In order to optimise the added value from investments funded wholly or in part through the budget of the Union, synergies should be sought in particular between the Funds and directly managed instruments, including the Reform Delivery Tool . This policy coordination should promote easy-to-use mechanisms and multi-level governance . Those synergies should be achieved through key mechanisms, namely the recognition of flat rates for eligible costs from Horizon Europe for a similar operation and the possibility of combining funding from different Union instruments in the same operation as long as double financing is avoided. This Regulation should therefore set out rules for complementary financing from the Funds.

Amendment 33

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 42 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (42a) Managing authorities should have the possibility to implement financial instruments through a direct award of a contract to the EIB Group, national promotional banks and to international financial institutions (IFIs).

Amendment 34

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 44

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (44) In full respect of the applicable State aid and public procurement rules already clarified during the 2014-2020 programming period, the managing authorities should have the possibility to decide on the most appropriate implementation options for financial instruments in order to address the specific needs of target regions. (44) In full respect of the applicable State aid and public procurement rules already clarified during the 2014-2020 programming period, the managing authorities should have the possibility to decide on the most appropriate implementation options for financial instruments in order to address the specific needs of target regions. In this framework, the Commission should, in cooperation with the European Court of Auditors, give guidance to auditors, managing authorities and beneficiaries for assessing compliance with state aid and developing state aid schemes.

Amendment 35

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 45 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (45a) In order to increase accountability and transparency, the Commission should provide for a complaints-handling system accessible to all citizens and stakeholders at all stages of preparation and implementation of programmes including monitoring and evaluation.

Amendment 36

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 46

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (46) In order to hasten the start of programme implementation, the roll-over of implementation arrangements from the previous programming period should be facilitated. The use of the computerised system already established for the previous programming period, adapted as required, should be maintained, unless a new technology is necessary. (46) In order to hasten the start of programme implementation, the roll-over of implementation arrangements , including administrative and IT systems, from the previous programming period should be facilitated where possible . The use of the computerised system already established for the previous programming period, adapted as required, should be maintained, unless a new technology is necessary.

Amendment 37

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 48 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (48 a) To support the effective use of the Funds, the EIB support should be available to all Member States at their request. This could cover capacity building, support for project identification, preparation and implementation, as well as advice on financial instruments and investment platforms.

Amendment 38

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 50

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (50) To ensure an appropriate balance between the effective and efficient implementation of the Funds and the related administrative costs and burdens, the frequency, scope and coverage of management verifications should be based on a risk assessment that takes account of factors such as the type of operations implemented, the beneficiaries as well as the level of risk identified by previous management verifications and audits. (50) To ensure an appropriate balance between the effective and efficient implementation of the Funds and the related administrative costs and burdens, the frequency, scope and coverage of management verifications should be based on a risk assessment that takes account of factors such as the type of operations implemented, the complexity and number of operations, the beneficiaries as well as the level of risk identified by previous management verifications and audits. Management and control measures for the Funds should be proportionate to the level of risk to the Union budget.

Amendment 39

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 58

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (58) Member States should also prevent, detect and deal effectively with any irregularities including fraud committed by beneficiaries. Moreover, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 (18), and Regulations (Euratom, EC) No 2988/95 (19) and No 2185/96 (20) the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out administrative investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections, with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 (21), the European Public Prosecutor's Office may investigate and prosecute fraud and other criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union as provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/1371 (22) on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law. Member States should take the necessary measures so that any person or entity receiving Union funds fully cooperates in the protection of the Union’s financial interests, grants the necessary rights and access to the Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) and the European Court of Auditors (ECA) and ensures that any third parties involved in the implementation of Union funds grant equivalent rights. Member States should report to the Commission on detected irregularities including fraud, and on their follow-up as well as on the follow-up of OLAF investigations. (58) Member States should also prevent, detect and deal effectively with any irregularities including fraud committed by beneficiaries. Moreover, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 (18), and Regulations (Euratom, EC) No 2988/95 (19) and No 2185/96 (20) the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out administrative investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections, with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 (21), the European Public Prosecutor's Office may investigate and prosecute fraud and other criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union as provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/1371 (22) on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law. Member States should take the necessary measures so that any person or entity receiving Union funds fully cooperates in the protection of the Union’s financial interests, grants the necessary rights and access to the Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) and the European Court of Auditors (ECA) and ensures that any third parties involved in the implementation of Union funds grant equivalent rights. Member States should provide a detailed report to the Commission on detected irregularities including fraud, and on their follow-up as well as on the follow-up of OLAF investigations. Member States that do not participate in the enhanced cooperation with the EPPO should report to the Commission on decisions taken by national prosecution authorities in relation to cases of irregularities affecting the Union budget.

Amendment 40

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 61

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (61) Objective criteria should be established for designating eligible regions and areas for support from the Funds. To this end, the identification of the regions and areas at Union level should be based on the common system of classification of the regions established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council (23), as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 868/2014 (24). (61) Objective criteria should be established for designating eligible regions and areas for support from the Funds. To this end, the identification of the regions and areas at Union level should be based on the common system of classification of the regions established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council (23), as most recently amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/2066 (24).

Amendment 41

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 62

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (62) In order to set out an appropriate financial framework for the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund, the Commission should set out the annual breakdown of available allocations per Member State under the Investment for jobs and growth goal together with the list of eligible regions, as well as the allocations for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg). Taking into account that the national allocations of Member States should be established on the basis of the statistical data and forecasts available in 2018 and given the forecasting uncertainties, the Commission should review the total allocations of all Member States in 2024 on the basis of the most recent statistics available at the time and, where there is a cumulative divergence of more than +/- 5 %, it should adjust those allocations for the years 2025 to 2027 in order for the outcomes of the mid-term review and the technical adjustment exercise to be reflected in programme amendments at the same time. (62) In order to set out an appropriate financial framework for the ERDF, the ESF+ , the EMFF and the Cohesion Fund, the Commission should set out the annual breakdown of available allocations per Member State under the Investment for jobs and growth goal together with the list of eligible regions, as well as the allocations for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg). Taking into account that the national allocations of Member States should be established on the basis of the statistical data and forecasts available in 2018 and given the forecasting uncertainties, the Commission should review the total allocations of all Member States in 2024 on the basis of the most recent statistics available at the time and, where there is a cumulative divergence of more than +/- 5 %, it should adjust those allocations for the years 2025 to 2027 in order for the outcomes of the mid-term review and the technical adjustment exercise to be reflected in programme amendments at the same time.

Amendment 42

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 63

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (63) Trans-European transport networks projects in accordance with Regulation (EU) No [new CEF Regulation] (25) will continue to be financed from the Cohesion Fund via both shared management and the direct implementation mode under the Connecting Europe Facility (‘CEF’). Building on the successful approach of the 2014-2020 programming period, EUR 10 000 000 000 of the Cohesion Fund should be transferred to the CEF for this purpose. (63) Trans-European transport networks projects in accordance with Regulation (EU) No [new CEF Regulation] (25) will continue to be financed from the Cohesion Fund via both shared management and the direct implementation mode under the Connecting Europe Facility (‘CEF’). Building on the successful approach of the 2014-2020 programming period, EUR 4 000 000 000 of the Cohesion Fund should be transferred to the CEF for this purpose.

Amendment 43

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 64

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (64) A certain amount of the resources from ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund should be allocated to the European Urban Initiative which should be implemented through direct or indirect management by the Commission. (64) A certain amount of the resources from ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund should be allocated to the European Urban Initiative which should be implemented through direct or indirect management by the Commission. Further reflection should be carried out in future on the specific support which is provided for disadvantaged regions and communities.

Amendment 44

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 65 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (65a) With a view to tackling the challenges faced by middle income regions, as described in the 7th cohesion report (low (1a) growth compared to more developed regions but also compared to less developed regions, this issue being faced especially by regions with a GDP per capita between 90 % and 100 % of the average GDP of the EU-27), ‘transition regions’ should receive adequate support and be defined as regions whose GDP per capita is between 75 % and 100 % of the average GDP of the EU-27.

Amendment 45

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 66 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (66 a) Within the context of the UK's withdrawal from the Union, several regions and Member States will be more exposed to the consequences of this withdrawal than the others, due to their geography, nature and / or the extent of their trading links. It is therefore important to identify practical solutions for support also within the framework of cohesion policy to address the challenges for the concerned regions and Member States once the UK's withdrawal has taken place. Furthermore, a continuous cooperation, involving exchanges of information and good practices at the level of the most impacted local and regional authorities and Member States will need to be established.

Amendment 46

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 67

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (67) It is necessary to establish the maximum rates of co-financing in the area of cohesion policy by category of region in order to ensure that the principle of co-financing is respected through an appropriate level of public or private national support. Those rates should reflect the level of economic development of regions in terms of GDP per capita in relation to the EU-27 average. (67) It is necessary to establish the maximum rates of co-financing in the area of cohesion policy by category of region in order to ensure that the principle of co-financing is respected through an appropriate level of public or private national support. Those rates should reflect the level of economic development of regions in terms of GDP per capita in relation to the EU-27 average , while safeguarding no less favourable treatment due to shifts in their categorisation .

Amendment 47

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 69

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (69) In addition the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the establishment of the criteria for determining the cases of irregularities to be reported, the definition of unit costs, lump sums, flat rates and financing not linked to costs applicable to all Member States as well as the establishment of standardised off-the-shelf sampling methodologies. (69) In addition the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the amendment of the European code of conduct on partnership in order to adapt the code to this Regulation, the establishment of the criteria for determining the cases of irregularities to be reported, the definition of unit costs, lump sums, flat rates and financing not linked to costs applicable to all Member States as well as the establishment of standardised off-the-shelf sampling methodologies.

Amendment 48

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 70

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (70) It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. (70) It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate , transparent consultations with all interested parties during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.

Amendment 49

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 73

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (73) The objectives of this Regulation, namely to strengthen economic, social and territorial cohesion and to lay down common financial rules for part of the budget of the Union implemented under shared management, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States by reason on the one hand due to the extent of the disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions, as well as the limit on the financial resources of the Member States and regions and on the other hand due to the need for a coherent implementation framework covering several Union funds under shared management. Since those objectives can therefore rather be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives. (73) The objectives of this Regulation, namely to strengthen economic, social and territorial cohesion and to lay down common financial rules for part of the budget of the Union implemented under shared management, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States by reason on the one hand due to the extent of the disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the specific challenges faced by the least favoured regions, as well as the limit on the financial resources of the Member States and regions and on the other hand due to the need for a coherent implementation framework covering several Union funds under shared management. Since those objectives can therefore rather be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.

Amendment 50

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 — paragraph 1 — point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (a) financial rules for the European Regional Development Fund (‘ERDF’), the European Social Fund Plus (‘ESF+’), the Cohesion Fund,, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (‘EMFF’), the Asylum and Migration Fund (‘AMIF’), the Internal Security Fund (‘ISF’) and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (‘BMVI’) (‘the Funds’); (a) financial rules for the European Regional Development Fund (‘ERDF’), the European Social Fund Plus (‘ESF+’), the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (‘EAFRD’) , the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (‘EMFF’), the Asylum and Migration Fund (‘AMIF’), the Internal Security Fund (‘ISF’) and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (‘BMVI’) (‘the Funds’);

Amendment 431

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 — paragraph 1 — point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (b) common provisions applicable to the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the EMFF. (b) common provisions applicable to the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the EMFF , and to the EAFRD as prescribed in paragraph 1a of this Article .

Amendment 432

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 — paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1a. Title I, Chapter I — Article 2- paragraph 4 a, Chapter II — Article 5, Title III, Chapter II — Articles 22 to 28 and Title IV — Chapter III — Section I- Articles 41 to 43 shall apply to aid measures financed by the EAFRD and Title I- Chapter 1 — Article 2- paragraphs 15 to 25 , as well as Title V- Chapter II — Section II — Articles 52 to 56 shall apply to financial instruments provided for in Article 74 of Regulation (EU) …/… [CAP Strategic Plans Regulation] and supported under the EAFRD.

Amendment 54

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 — paragraph 1 — point 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) ‘relevant country specific recommendations’ mean Council recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) and Article 148(4) of the TFEU relating to structural challenges which it is appropriate to address through multiannual investments that fall within the scope of the Funds as set out in Fund-specific Regulations, and relevant recommendations adopted in accordance with Article [XX] of Regulation (EU) [number of the new Energy Union Governance Regulation] of the European Parliament and of the Council; (1) ‘relevant country specific recommendations’ mean Council recommendations adopted in accordance with Articles 121(2) and (4) and Article 148(4) of the TFEU relating to structural challenges which it is appropriate to address through multiannual investments that fall within the scope of the Funds as set out in Fund-specific Regulations, and relevant recommendations adopted in accordance with Article [XX] of Regulation (EU) [number of the new Energy Union Governance Regulation] of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Amendment 55

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 — paragraph 1 — point 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1 a) ‘enabling condition’ means a concrete and precisely defined condition which has a genuine link to a direct impact on the effective and efficient achievement of a specific objective of the programme;

Amendment 56

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 — paragraph 1 — point 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (4 a) ‘programme’ in the context of the EAFRD means the CAP Strategic Plans as referred to in Regulation (EU) […] (the ‘CAP Strategic Plans Regulation’);

Amendment 57

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 — paragraph 1 — point 8 — point c

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (c) in the context of State aid schemes, the undertaking which receives the aid; (c) in the context of State aid schemes, the body or the undertaking , as appropriate, which receives the aid , except where the aid per undertaking is less than EUR 200 000 , in which case the Member State concerned may decide that the beneficiary is the body granting the aid, without prejudice to Commission Regulations (EU) No 1407/2013 (1a) , (EU) No 1408/2013 (1b) and (EU) No 717/2014 (1c);

Amendment 58

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 — paragraph 1 — point 9

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (9) ‘small project fund’ means an operation in an Interreg programme aimed at the selection and implementation of projects of limited financial volume; (9) ‘small project fund’ means an operation in an Interreg programme aimed at the selection and implementation of projects, including people-to-people projects of limited financial volume;

Amendment 59

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 — paragraph 1 — point 21

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (21) ‘specific fund’ means a fund , set-up by a managing authority or a holding fund , to provide financial products to final recipients; (21) ‘specific fund’ means a fund set up by a managing authority or a holding fund through which they provide financial products to final recipients;

Amendment 60

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 — paragraph 1 — point 36 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (36a) ‘energy efficiency first principle’ means the prioritisation, in energy planning, policy and investment decisions, of measures that make the demand and supply of energy more efficient;

Amendment 61

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 — paragraph 1 — point 37

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (37) ‘climate proofing’ means a process to ensure that infrastructure is resilient to the adverse impacts of the climate in accordance with national rules and guidance, where available, or internationally recognised standards. (37) ‘climate proofing’ means a process to ensure that infrastructure is resilient to the adverse impacts of the climate in accordance with internationally recognised standards or national rules and guidance, where available, that the energy efficiency first principle is respected and that specific emission reduction and decarbonisation pathways are chosen;

Amendment 62

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 — paragraph 1 — point 37 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (37a) ‘EIB’ means the European Investment Bank, the European Investment Fund or any subsidiary of the European Investment Bank.

Amendment 63

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 — paragraph 1 — point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (a) a smarter Europe by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation; (a) a more competitive and smarter Europe by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation and strengthening small and medium-sized enterprises ;

Amendment 64

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 — paragraph 1 — point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (b) a greener, low-carbon Europe by promoting clean and fair energy transition, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate adaptation and risk prevention and management; (b) a greener, low-carbon transitioning towards a net zero carbon economy and resilient Europe by promoting clean and fair energy transition, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate change mitigation and adaptation and risk prevention and management;

Amendment 65

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 — paragraph 1 — point c

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (c) a more connected Europe by enhancing mobility and regional ICT connectivity; (c) a more connected Europe by enhancing mobility , including smart and sustainable mobility, and regional ICT connectivity;

Amendment 66

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 — paragraph 1 — point d

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (d) a more social Europe implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights; (d) a more social and inclusive Europe implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights;

Amendment 67

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 — paragraph 1 — point e

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (e) a Europe closer to citizens by fostering the sustainable and integrated development of urban, rural and coastal areas and local initiatives. (e) a Europe closer to citizens by fostering the sustainable and integrated development of all regions, areas and local initiatives.

Amendment 68

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 — paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 3. Member States shall provide information on the support for environment and climate objectives using a methodology based on types of intervention for each of the Funds. That methodology shall consist of assigning a specific weighting to the support provided at a level which reflects the extent to which such support makes a contribution to environmental objectives and to climate objectives. In the case of the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund weightings shall be attached to dimensions and codes for the types of intervention established in Annex I. 3. Member States shall ensure climate proofing for relevant operations through the entire planning and implementation process and shall provide information on the support for environment and climate objectives using a methodology based on types of intervention for each of the Funds. That methodology shall consist of assigning a specific weighting to the support provided at a level which reflects the extent to which such support makes a contribution to environmental objectives and to climate objectives. In the case of the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund weightings shall be attached to dimensions and codes for the types of intervention established in Annex I.

Amendment 69

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 — paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 4. Member States and the Commission shall ensure the coordination, complementarity and coherence between the Funds and other Union instruments such as the Reform Support Programme, including the Reform Delivery Tool and the Technical Support Instrument. They shall optimise mechanisms for coordination between those responsible to avoid duplication during planning and implementation. 4. In accordance with their respective responsibilities and in line with the principles of subsidiarity and multilevel governance, Member States and the Commission shall ensure the coordination, complementarity and coherence between the Funds and other Union instruments such as the Reform Support Programme, including the Reform Delivery Tool and the Technical Support Instrument. They shall optimise mechanisms for coordination between those responsible in order to avoid duplication during planning and implementation.

Amendment 70

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 — paragraph 4 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 4 a. Member States and the Commission shall ensure compliance with relevant State aid rules.

Amendment 71

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 — paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1. The Member States and the Commission shall implement the budget of the Union allocated to the Funds under shared management in accordance with Article [63] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [number of the new financial regulation] (the ‘Financial Regulation’). 1. The Member States , in accordance with their institutional and legal framework, and the Commission shall implement the budget of the Union allocated to the Funds under shared management in accordance with Article [63] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [number of the new financial regulation] (the ‘Financial Regulation’).

Amendment 72

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 — paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 2. However , the Commission shall implement the amount of support from the Cohesion Fund transferred to the Connecting Europe Facility (‘CEF’), the European Urban Initiative, Interregional Innovative Investments, the amount of support transferred from the ESF+ to transnational cooperation, the amounts contributed to InvestEU (37) and technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission under direct or indirect management in accordance with [points (a) and (c) of Article 62(1)] of the Financial Regulation. 2. Without prejudice to Article 1(2) , the Commission shall implement the amount of support from the Cohesion Fund transferred to the Connecting Europe Facility (‘CEF’), the European Urban Initiative, Interregional Innovative Investments, the amount of support transferred from the ESF+ to transnational cooperation, the amounts contributed to InvestEU (37) and technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission under direct or indirect management in accordance with [points (a) and (c) of Article 62(1)] of the Financial Regulation.

Amendment 73

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 — paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 3. The Commission may implement outermost regions' cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) under indirect management. 3. The Commission may , with the agreement of the Member State and the region concerned, implement outermost regions' cooperation under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) under indirect management.

Amendment 74

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 — paragraph 1 — introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1. Each Member State shall organise a partnership with the competent regional and local authorities . That partnership shall include at least the following partners: 1. For the Partnership Agreement and each programme, each Member State shall , in accordance with its institutional and legal framework, organise a fully -fledged, effective partnership. That partnership shall include at least the following partners:

Amendment 75

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 — paragraph 1 — point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (a) urban and other public authorities; (a) regional, local, urban and other public authorities;

Amendment 76

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 — paragraph 1 — point c

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (c) relevant bodies representing civil society, environmental partners, and bodies responsible for promoting social inclusion, fundamental rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality and non-discrimination. (c) relevant bodies representing civil society, such as environmental partners , non-governmental organisations , and bodies responsible for promoting social inclusion, fundamental rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality and non-discrimination.

Amendment 77

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 — paragraph 1 — point c a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (c a) research institutions and universities, where appropriate.

Amendments 78 and 459

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 — paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 2. In accordance with the multi-level governance principle, the Member State shall involve those partners in the preparation of Partnership Agreements and throughout the preparation and implementation of programmes including through participation in monitoring committees in accordance with Article 34. 2. In accordance with the multi-level governance principle and following a bottom-up approach , the Member State shall involve those partners in the preparation of Partnership Agreements and throughout the preparation, implementation and evaluation of programmes including through participation in monitoring committees in accordance with Article 34. In that context, Member States shall allocate an appropriate percentage of the resources coming from the Funds for the administrative capacity building of social partners and civil society organisations. For cross-border programmes, the Member States concerned shall include partners from all participating Member States.

Amendment 79

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 — paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 3. The organisation and implementation of partnership shall be carried out in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014 (38). 3. The organisation and implementation of partnership shall be carried out in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014 (38). The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 107, concerning amendments to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014 in order to adapt that Delegated Regulation to this Regulation.

Amendment 80

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 — paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 4. At least once a year, the Commission shall consult the organisations which represent the partners at Union level on the implementation of programmes. 4. At least once a year, the Commission shall consult the organisations which represent the partners at Union level on the implementation of programmes , and shall report to the European Parliament and Council on the outcome .

Amendment 81

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Article 6 a Horizontal Principles 1. Member States and the Commission shall ensure respect for fundamental rights and compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the implementation of the Funds. 2. Member States and the Commission shall ensure that equality between men and women, gender mainstreaming and the integration of gender perspective are taken into account and promoted throughout the preparation and implementation of programmes, including in relation to monitoring, reporting and evaluation. 3. Member States and the Commission shall take appropriate steps to prevent any discrimination based on gender, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation during the preparation, implementation, monitoring, reporting and evaluation of programmes. In particular, accessibility for persons with disabilities shall be taken into account throughout the preparation and implementation of programmes. 4. The objectives of the Funds shall be pursued in line with the principle of sustainable development, taking into account the UN Sustainable Development Goals and with the Union’s promotion of the aim of preserving, protecting and improving the quality of environment and combating climate change, taking into account the polluter pays principle, as set out in Article 191(1) and (2) TFEU. Member States and the Commission shall ensure that environmental protection requirements, resource efficiency, energy efficiency first-principle, socially just energy transition, climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, disaster resilience, and risk prevention and management are promoted in the preparation and implementation of programmes. They shall aim at avoiding investments related to production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels.

Amendment 82

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 — paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1. Each Member State shall prepare a Partnership Agreement which sets out arrangements for using the Funds in an effective and efficient way for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2027. 1. Each Member State shall prepare a Partnership Agreement which sets out arrangements for using the Funds in an effective and efficient way for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2027. Such Partnership Agreement shall be prepared in accordance with the code of conduct established by the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014.

Amendment 83

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 — paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 2. The Member State shall submit the Partnership Agreement to the Commission before or at the same time as the submission of the first programme. 2. The Member State shall submit the Partnership Agreement to the Commission before or at the same time as the submission of the first programme , but not later than 30 April 2021 .

Amendment 84

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 — paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 3. The Partnership Agreement may be submitted together with the relevant annual National Reform Programme. 3. The Partnership Agreement may be submitted together with the relevant annual National Reform Programme and the National Energy and Climate Plan .

Amendment 85

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (a) the selected policy objectives indicating by which of the Funds and programmes they will be pursued and a justification thereto, and where relevant, a justification for using the delivery mode of the InvestEU, taking into account relevant country-specific recommendations; (a) the selected policy objectives indicating by which of the Funds and programmes they will be pursued and a justification thereto, taking into account and listing relevant country-specific recommendations , as well as regional challenges ;

Amendment 86

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point b — point i

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (i) a summary of the policy choices and the main results expected for each of the Funds , including where relevant, through the use of InvestEU ; (i) a summary of the policy choices and the main results expected for each of the Funds;

Amendment 87

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point b — point ii

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (ii) coordination, demarcation and complementarities between the Funds and, where appropriate, coordination between national and regional programmes; (ii) coordination, demarcation and complementarities between the Funds and, where appropriate, coordination between national and regional programmes , in particular with regard to CAP Strategic Plans referred to in Regulation (EU) […] (the ‘CAP Strategic Plans Regulation’) ;

Amendment 88

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point b — point iii

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (iii) complementarities between the Funds and other Union instruments, including LIFE strategic integrated projects and strategic nature projects; (iii) complementarities and synergies between the Funds and other Union instruments, including LIFE strategic integrated projects and strategic nature projects , and, where appropriate, projects funded under Horizon Europe ;

Amendment 89

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point b — point iii a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (iii a) delivery on targets, policies and measures under the National Energy and Climate Plans;

Amendment 90

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point c

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (c) the preliminary financial allocation from each of the Funds by policy objective at national level, respecting Fund-specific rules on thematic concentration; (c) the preliminary financial allocation from each of the Funds by policy objective at national and where appropriate at regional level, respecting Fund-specific rules on thematic concentration;

Amendment 91

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point d

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (d) where relevant, the breakdown of financial resources by category of regions drawn up in accordance with Article 102(2) and the amounts of allocations proposed to be transferred between categories of regions pursuant to Article 105; (d) the breakdown of financial resources by category of regions drawn up in accordance with Article 102(2) and the amounts of allocations proposed to be transferred between categories of regions pursuant to Article 105;

Amendment 92

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point e

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (e) the amounts to be contributed to InvestEU by Fund and by category of regions; deleted

Amendment 93

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point g

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (g) a summary of the actions which the Member State concerned shall take to reinforce its administrative capacity of the implementation of the Funds. (g) a summary of the actions which the Member State concerned shall take to reinforce its administrative capacity of the implementation of the Funds and its management and control system .

Amendment 94

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point g a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (ga) where appropriate, an integrated approach to address the demographic challenges and/ or specific needs of regions and areas;

Amendment 95

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 — point g b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (g b) a communication and visibility strategy.

Amendment 96

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment The EIB may, at the request of Member States, participate in the preparation of the Partnership Agreement, as well as in activities relating to the preparation of operations, financial instruments and PPPs.

Amendment 97

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 — paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment With regard to the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg), the Partnership Agreement shall only contain the list of planned programmes. With regard to the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg), the Partnership Agreement shall only contain the list of planned programmes and the cross-border investment needs in the concerned Member State .

Amendment 98

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 — paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1. The Commission shall assess the Partnership Agreement and its compliance with this Regulation and with the Fund-specific rules. In its assessment, the Commission shall, in particular, take into account relevant country-specific recommendations. 1. The Commission shall assess the Partnership Agreement and its compliance with this Regulation and with the Fund-specific rules. In its assessment, the Commission shall, take into account the provisions of Article 4 and 6, the relevant country-specific recommendations , as well as the measures linked to integrated national energy and climate plans and the way they are addressed .

Amendment 99

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 — paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 2. The Commission may make observations within three months of the date of submission by the Member State of the Partnership Agreement. 2. The Commission may make observations within two months of the date of submission by the Member State of the Partnership Agreement.

Amendment 100

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 — paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 3. The Member State shall review the Partnership Agreement taking into account the observations made by the Commission. 3. The Member State shall review the Partnership Agreement taking into account the observations made by the Commission within one month of the date of their submission .

Amendment 101

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 — paragraph 4

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 4. The Commission shall adopt a decision by means of an implementing act approving the Partnership Agreement no later than four months after the date of submission of that Partnership Agreement by the Member State concerned. The Partnership Agreement shall not be amended. 4. The Commission shall adopt a decision by means of an implementing act approving the Partnership Agreement no later than four months after the date of the first submission of that Partnership Agreement by the Member State concerned. The Partnership Agreement shall not be amended.

Amendment 428

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 — paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1. Member States may allocate, in the Partnership Agreement or in the request for an amendment of a programme, the amount of ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the EMFF to be contributed to InvestEU and delivered through budgetary guarantees. The amount to be contributed to InvestEU shall not exceed 5 % of the total allocation of each Fund , except in duly justified cases . Such contributions shall not constitute transfers of resources under Article 21 . 1. As of 1 January 2023, Member States , with the agreement of the managing authorities concerned, may allocate, in the request for an amendment of a programme, up to 2 % of ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the EMFF to be contributed to InvestEU and delivered through budgetary guarantees. Up to 3 % of the total allocation of each Fund may be further allocated to InvestEU under the mid-term review . Such contributions shall be available for investments in line with cohesion policy objectives and in the same category of regions targeted by the Funds of origin. Whenever an amount of ERDF, ESF+, Cohesion Fund is contributed to Invest EU, the enabling conditions as described in Article 11 and in Annexes III and IV to this Regulation shall apply. Only resources of future calendar years may be allocated .

Amendment 103

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 — paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 2. For the Partnership Agreement, resources of the current and future calendar years may be allocated. For the request for an amendment of a programme, only resources of future calendar years may be allocated. deleted

Amendment 104

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 — paragraph 3

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 3. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be used for the provisioning of the part of the EU guarantee under the Member State compartment. 3. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be used for the provisioning of the part of the EU guarantee under the respective Member State compartment.

Amendment 105

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 — paragraph 4 — subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Where a contribution agreement, as set out in Article [9] of the [InvestEU Regulation], has not been concluded by 31 December 2021 for an amount referred to in paragraph 1 allocated in the Partnership Agreement , the Member State shall submit a request for amendment of a programme or programmes to use the corresponding amount. Where a contribution agreement, as set out in Article [9] of the [InvestEU Regulation], has not been concluded by 31 December 2023 for an amount referred to in paragraph 1, the Member State shall submit a request for amendment of a programme or programmes to use the corresponding amount.

Amendment 106

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 — paragraph 4 — subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment The contribution agreement for an amount referred to in paragraph 1 allocated in the request of the amendment of a programme shall be concluded simultaneously with the adoption of the decision amending the programme. The contribution agreement for an amount referred to in paragraph 1 allocated in the request of the amendment of a programme shall be concluded , or amended as the case may be, simultaneously with the adoption of the decision amending the programme.

Amendment 107

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 — paragraph 5

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 5. Where a guarantee agreement, as set out in Article [9] of the [InvestEU Regulation], has not been concluded within nine months from the approval of the contribution agreement, the respective amounts paid into the common provisioning fund as a provisioning shall be transferred back to a programme or programmes and the Member State shall submit a corresponding request for a programme amendment. 5. Where a guarantee agreement, as set out in Article [9] of the [InvestEU Regulation], has not been concluded within nine months from the approval of the contribution agreement, the respective amounts paid into the common provisioning fund as a provisioning shall be transferred back to the original programme or programmes and the Member State shall submit a corresponding request for a programme amendment. In this particular case, resources of past calendar years may be modified, as long as the commitments are not yet implemented.

Amendment 108

Proposal for a regulation

Article 10 — paragraph 7

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 7. Resources generated by or attributable to the amounts contributed to InvestEU and delivered through budgetary guarantees shall be made available to the Member State and shall be used for support under the same objective or objectives in the form of financial instruments. 7. Resources generated by or attributable to the amounts contributed to InvestEU and delivered through budgetary guarantees shall be made available to the Member State and the local or regional authority concerned by the contribution and shall be used for support under the same objective or objectives in the form of financial instruments.

Amendment 109

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 — paragraph 1 — subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment For each specific objective, prerequisite conditions for its effective and efficient implementation (‘enabling conditions’) are laid down in this Regulation. For each specific objective, prerequisite conditions for its effective and efficient implementation (‘enabling conditions’) are laid down in this Regulation. Enabling conditions shall apply to the extent to which they contribute to the achievement of the specific objectives of the programme.

Amendment 110

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 — paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 2. When preparing a programme or introducing a new specific objective as part of a programme amendment, the Member State shall assess whether the enabling conditions linked to the selected specific objective are fulfilled. An enabling condition is fulfilled where all the related criteria are met. The Member State shall identify in each programme or in the programme amendment the fulfilled and non-fulfilled enabling conditions and where it considers that an enabling condition is fulfilled, it shall provide justification. 2. When preparing a programme or introducing a new specific objective as part of a programme amendment, the Member State shall assess whether the enabling conditions linked to the selected specific objective are fulfilled. An enabling condition is fulfilled where all the related criteria are met. The Member State shall identify in each programme or in the programme amendment the fulfilled and non-fulfilled enabling conditions and where it considers that an enabling condition is fulfilled, it shall provide justification. On the request of a Member State, the EIB may contribute to the assessments of actions needed to fulfil the relevant enabling conditions.

Amendment 111

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 — paragraph 4 — subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment The Commission shall, within three months of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 3, perform an assessment and inform the Member State where it agrees with the fulfilment. The Commission shall, within two months of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 3, perform an assessment and inform the Member State where it agrees with the fulfilment.

Amendment 112

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 — paragraph 4 — subparagraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Where the Commission disagrees with the assessment of the Member State, it shall inform the Member State accordingly and give it the opportunity to present its observations within one month . Where the Commission disagrees with the assessment of the Member State, it shall inform the Member State accordingly and give it the opportunity to present its observations within maximum two months .

Amendment 113

Proposal for a regulation

Article 11 — paragraph 5 — subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Expenditure related to operations linked to the specific objective cannot be included in payment applications until the Commission has informed the Member State of the fulfilment of the enabling condition pursuant to paragraph 4. Expenditure related to operations linked to the specific objective may be included in payment applications before the Commission has informed the Member State of the fulfilment of the enabling condition pursuant to paragraph 4 , without prejudice to the suspension of the reimbursement itself until such time as the condition is fulfilled .

Amendment 115

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 — paragraph 1 — subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment The Member State shall establish a performance framework which shall allow monitoring, reporting on and evaluating programme performance during its implementation, and contribute to measuring the overall performance of the Funds. The Member State , where appropriate, in cooperation with local and regional authorities, shall establish a performance framework which shall allow monitoring, reporting on and evaluating programme performance during its implementation, and contribute to measuring the overall performance of the Funds.

Amendment 116

Proposal for a regulation

Article 12 — paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 2. Milestones and targets shall be established in relation to each specific objective within a programme, with the exception of technical assistance and of the specific objective addressing material deprivation set out in Article [ 4(c) ( vii )] of the ESF+ Regulation. 2. Milestones and targets shall be established in relation to each specific objective within a programme, with the exception of technical assistance and of the specific objective addressing material deprivation set out in Article [ 4(1) ( xi )] of the ESF+ Regulation.

Amendment 117

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 — paragraph 1 — introductory part

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1. For programmes supported by the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund, the Member State shall review each programme, taking into account the following elements: 1. For programmes supported by the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund, the Member State and relevant managing authorities shall review each programme, taking into account the following elements:

Amendment 118

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 — paragraph 1 — point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (a) the challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in 2024; (a) new challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in 2024 and the targets identified in the implementation of the integrated national climate and energy plans, if relevant ;

Amendment 119

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 — paragraph 1 — point b

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (b) the socio-economic situation of the Member State or region concerned; (b) the socio-economic situation of the Member State or region concerned , including the state of implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights and territorial needs with a view to reducing disparities, as well as economic and social inequalities ;

Amendment 120

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 — paragraph 1 — point d a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (d a) any major negative financial, economic or social developments which require an adjustment of the programmes, including as a consequence of symmetric or asymmetric shocks in the Member States and their regions.

Amendment 121

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 — paragraph 2 — subparagraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment The Member State shall submit to the Commission by 31 March 2025 a request for the amendment of each programme in accordance with Article 19(1). The Member State shall justify the amendment on the basis of the elements set out in paragraph 1. In accordance with the outcome of the review, the Member State shall submit to the Commission by 31 March 2025 a request for the amendment of each programme in accordance with Article 19(1) or state that no amendment is requested . The Member State shall justify the amendment on the basis of the elements set out in paragraph 1 or, as appropriate, give reasons for not requesting the amendment of a programme .

Amendment 122

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 — paragraph 2 — subparagraph 2 — point a

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (a) the allocations of the financial resources by priority including the amounts for the years 2026 and 2027; (a) the revised initial allocations of the financial resources by priority including the amounts for the years 2026 and 2027;

Amendment 123

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 — paragraph 2 — subparagraph 2 — point b a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (b a) the amounts to be contributed to InvestEU per Fund and per category of region, where appropriate;

Amendment 124

Proposal for a regulation

Article 14 — paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 3 a. The Commission shall, by 31 March 2026, adopt a report summarising the results of the review referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2. The Commission shall communicate the report to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

Amendments 425/rev, 444/rev, 448 and 469

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment […] deleted

Amendment 140

Proposal for a regulation

Article 16 — paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission Amendment 1. Member States shall prepare programmes to implement the Funds for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2027. 1. Member States in cooperation with the partners referred to in Article 6 shall prepare programmes to implement the Funds for