16. Welcomes the recent creation, by the Commission, of an out-of court complaints network for
financial services, FIN- NET, and urges the Commission to monitor its operation as an effective mechanismfor facilitating the out-of-court resolution of cross-border complaints; believes that such cross-border coop-eration between relevant authorities will have an essential role in promoting consumer confidence andstrengthening practical safeguards both before and after a move to the country of origin approach;
17. Notes the link between the issues set out in this Communication and the final report of the Com-
mittee of Wise Men on the regulation of European securities markets; in view of the difficulties of inter-pretation of the current Investment Services Directive, ensuring consistent implementation of an upgradedInvestment Directive Services at the national level will be one of the critical success factors;
18. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and FESCO.
8. Environmental issues of PVC
A5-0092/2001
European Parliament resolution on the Commission Green Paper on environmental issues of PVC
(COM(2000) 469  C5-0633/2000  2000/2297(COS))
The European Parliament,
 having regard to the Commission Green Paper (COM(2000) 469  C5-0633/2000),
 having regard to Articles 174 and 95 of the EC Treaty,
 having regard to its resolution of 14 November 1996 on the communication from the Commission
on the review of the Community strategy for waste management and the draft Council resolution onwaste policy (COM(95) 399  C4-0453/96) (
1),
 having regard to its resolution of 17 July 1997 on the Commission communication to the Council
and the European Parliament on environmental agreements (COM(96) 561  C4-0013/97) (2),
 having regard to the responsibilities assumed by the Commission under European Parliament and
Council Directive 2000/53/EC of 18 September 2000 on end of life vehicles (3),
 having regard to the Community legislation in force on waste (4), the landfill of waste (5) and the
incineration of waste (6),
 having regard to the Community legislation in force on restrictions on the marketing and use of
certain dangerous substances and preparations (7) and on the classification, packaging and labelling of
dangerous substances (8),
 having regard to the forthcoming revision of the Communitys chemicals policy,
(1) OJ C 362, 2.12.1996, p. 241.
(2) OJ C 286, 22.9.1997, p. 254.
(3) OJ L 269, 21.10.2000, p. 34.
(4) Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991, amending Directive 75/442/EEC on waste, OJ L 78, 26.3.1991,
p. 32.
(5) Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, OJ L 182, 16.7.1999, p. 1.
(6) European Parliament and Council Directive 2000/76/EC on the incineration of waste of 4 December 2000, OJ L 332,
28.12.2000, p. 91.
(7) Council Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976, OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 201.
(8) Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967, OJ 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1.C 21 E/112 EN 24.1.2002 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 3 April 2001
 having regard to the forthcoming EU strategy on sustainable development,
 having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy
and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (A5-0092/2001),
A. whereas the Commission is asking Parliament to contribute to the debate on the environmental issues
of PVC and in particular to the public consultation exercise with a view to the adoption of a compre-hensive Community strategy on the environmental problems linked to PVC,
B. whereas, as co-legislator in environmental protection and public health matters, the European Parlia-
ment has a moral obligation to participate in a constructive and ambitious way in the debate aimed atdefining such a strategy,
C. whereas Article 174(1) of the EC Treaty says that Community policy on the environment must con-
tribute to pursuit, among other things, of the objectives of preserving, protecting and improving thequality of the environment and protecting human health; whereas paragraph 2 of that Article alsostipulates that this policy is based on the precautionary principle and on the principles that preventiveaction should be taken, that environmental damage should, as a priority, be rectified at source andthat the polluter should pay; whereas, however, consideration must be given to the social, employ-ment, financial and economic implications of any proposed policy,
D. whereas in its abovementioned resolution of 14 November 1996 the European Parliament called for a
reduction of PVC, chlorine and heavy metals in waste,
E. whereas the Council resolution of 24 February 1997 on waste policy (
1) called for increased efforts to
reduce the presence of dangerous substances in waste where less dangerous alternatives are available,
F. whereas the management of PVC waste requires special attention on account of the specific character-
istics of this material and in particular on account of its high chlorine content, but whereas in order totackle this problem effectively, measures relating to PVC must not preclude the formulation of a moregeneral strategy for dealing with all plastics,
G. whereas the Commissions Green Paper focuses mainly on an analysis of the environmental impact of
PVC in terms of waste management, without analysing all aspects of PVC products throughout theirlife cycle and without considering the economic advantages and disadvantages of this material;whereas the Green Paper also raises questions about waste collection and management which relate
to all materials and not specifically to PVC and whereas the Green Paper does not compare PVC with
alternative materials,
H. having regard to the specific nature of the European PVC processing industry, which is essentially
made up of small and medium-sized enterprises, and therefore that SME impact studies are an essen-
tial prerequisite of implementing any new legislation,
I. whereas the use of stabilisers such as lead, cadmium or organotins in PVC products poses potential
risks of dispersion into the environment during production, processing and disposal of PVC and,consequently, risks to human health,
J. noting the recent widespread public fears about the use of phthalates in products intended for children
and at the same time the need to await the findings of the current risk evaluation,
(1) OJ C 76, 11.3.1997, p. 1.24.1.2002 EN C 21 E/113 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 3 April 2001
K. whereas the results of the current risk assessments are important but must not preclude immediate
measures for particularly exposed groups; whereas there is also a lacuna in the programme for existingsubstances, where total exposure to phthalates is not assessed,
L. having regard to the voluntary commitment given by the European PVC industry in March 2000 to
contribute to the reduction of the environmental impact of PVC throughout its lifecycle,
M. whereas it is necessary to tackle the problems relating to management of waste PVC within the more
general framework of an enhanced European strategy for waste disposal,
N. whereas in the case of all methods of processing PVC, the aims pursued should be not only to keep
emissions of pollutants to a minimum but also to minimise quantities of residues,
O. whereas in the past insufficient emphasis has been placed on developing recycling of PVC, including
melting for reuse, although technical solutions are at the development stage,
P. whereas the percentage of pre-consumer PVC waste currently recycled is about 80 %, while that of
post-consumer PVC is only around 3 % of annual sales and this method of waste treatment is alsobasically limited to sectoral applications such as pipe systems, sections for use in building, and roofingmembranes, and a few schemes for cable, packaging and floor-covering waste,
Q. whereas the proportion of PVC recycled must therefore be increased,R. whereas recycling of PVC must not perpetuate the problem of heavy metals,S. whereas the first step should be to recycle bulk PVC waste (such as pipe systems, tubes, sections for
use in building, window frames, roofing membranes and other PVC waste from the building trade), aslarge quantities are involved and they can be collected more readily,
T. whereas the incineration of PVC products gives rise to the emission of hazardous substances such as
hydrogen chloride (HCl), which then have to be neutralised to comply with the limits imposed by
existing legislation and thus gives rise to waste classified as hazardous in quantities which can exceed
the quantities that went into incincineration and the emission of heavy metals such as cadmium,which is very difficult to combat because of the volatility of the metal,
U. whereas the gradual commissioning of new generation incinerators will make it possible to reduce the
quantity of emissions from hazardous waste, but the quantity of residues should be kept to a mini-
mum,
V. whereas landfill is currently the most common method of disposing of PVC waste,
W. whereas the environment should be free from man-made or extracted substances and metals that
represent a threat to health or biological diversity,
X. whereas it is well known that PVC softeners will be released from PVC waste during landfill,
1. Welcomes the Commissions initiative of launching a large-scale public consultation exercise on the
environmental impact of PVC in order to identify practical solutions to the problems posed by the use ofsuch materials for the environment and human health;
2. Regrets, however, that the Commission has not performed any lifecycle analysis of PVC products to
compare them with alternative materials and calls on the Commission to ensure that the lifecycle impacton health and the environment of alternative products which are substitutes for PVC is assessed with atleast the same degree of precision and openness as that of PVC;C 21 E/114 EN 24.1.2002 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 3 April 2001
3. Considers that scientific research into the industrial, economic and environmental implications of
PVC and of any potential reformulations or substitutes (PET, aluminium, wood, etc.) could be valid itemsfor the Sixth Framework Research Programme;
4. Calls on the Commission to bring forward as soon as possible a draft long-term horizontal strategy
which would allow substitution policies, based on a comparative analysis of alternative products through-out their lifecycle, to be introduced for various categories of products including, in particular, productsdirectly linked to human health, disposable products and products that are difficult to separate;
5. Calls on the Commission to introduce rapidly a policy on the replacement of soft PVC, in so far as
the current risk analysis of phthalates indicates that it is desirable to reduce the exposure of people and theenvironment;
6. Calls on the Commission to issue a recommendation to the Member States calling on them not to
use PVC as a building material in buildings with a high fire risk;
7. Calls on the Commission to back up its forthcoming proposals on the future of the PVC industry
with a proper evaluation of the socio-economic impact, which examines in particular the effects onemployment in quantitative and qualitative terms, especially with regard to SMEs;
8. Calls on the Commission, in the discussions concerning the future of the PVC industry, to arrange for
appropriate participation by European works councils, other bodies representing employees from the PVCindustry and health, consumer and environmental NGOs, particularly where health, safety and environ-mental interests are at stake;
9. Calls on the Commission to include the applicant countries in the strategy and ensure that European
Union standards are introduced and applied there;
Waste collection
10. Draws attention to the importance of more effective differentiated waste collection which allows
different waste streams to be sent to the most appropriate disposal sites;
11. Calls on the Commisison in addition to propose appropriate measures to ensure separate collection
of PVC products, due to the problems they create in each waste disposal option, in particular incineration;
12. Considers that, in order to meet significant quantitative objectives in terms of waste collection, it is
necessary to establish a specific legal framework that encourages the drawing up of agreements involvingall interested parties;
13. Calls on the Commission therefore to examine existing good practices at Community and Member
State level with regard to voluntary commitments by the industry and environmental agreements andsubsequently to propose, on the basis of that analysis, legislation to encourage the attainment of ambitiousobjectives;
Additives
14. Considers that the commitments given by the PVC industry, although interesting and commendable,
are not sufficient to prevent the dispersion of hazardous substances, such as cadmium and lead, into the
environment, and particularly at the work place; considers that more thorough studies should therefore be
carried out with the aim of ensuring full protection of public health and assessing precisely the impact ofthe dispersion of these substances;
15. Considers, consequently, that it is necessary to adopt Community legislation designed to phase out
cadmium and lead-based stabilisers and to ban imports from non-member countries of PVC productscontaining these substances;24.1.2002 EN C 21 E/115 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 3 April 2001
16. Calls on the Commission to propose amendments to Directive 76/769/EEC with the aim of banning
all use of lead and cadmium as a stabiliser in the PVC industry;
17. Calls on the Commission to perform a risk assessment of possible substitutes for stabilisers and
additives;
18. Calls on the Commission to examine alternatives to the use of phthalates as plasticisers, which
present less risk to human health;
19. Suggests that the Commission and the PVC industry, taking also into account the current studies,
should look into the possibility of setting targets for reducing the use of phthalates, particularly in medicalequipment;
Management of PVC waste
Recycling
20. Considers that it is necessary to continue to develop technological research, primarily in the area of
chemical recycling that can separate chlorine from heavy metals, provided that strict emission standards
are applied, to reduce the costs of the process and improve its effectiveness, with a view to increasing thepercentage of PVC waste recycled and to reducing the percentage of waste for incineration or dumping;
21. Suggests that, on the model of the end-of-life vehicles Directive, the proportion of recycled waste be
increased, giving priority to the sectors where recycling does not perpetuate the problem of heavy metals,and that of waste for incineration or dumping consequently reduced, by making the producers at leastpartially responsible for the product life cycle through the introduction, starting with long-life products, of
closed cycles recovery systems;
22. Proposes the introduction of compulsory marking of all plastics to facilitate collection and sorting
of PVC applications and asks the Commission to support the development of existing technologies whichidentify and mechanically separate the different kinds of plastic;
23. Calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of providing incentives for the use of recycled
material giving priority to bulk PVC waste (such as pipe systems, tubes, sections for use in building,window frames, roofing membranes and other PVC waste from the building trade);
24. Considers that the task of defining precise objectives at Community level is a matter for the legis-
lator, which cannot therefore be left to the goodwill of the industry within the framework of the voluntarycommitment;
25. Calls on the Commission to present as soon as possible a proposal for framework legislation on
environmental agreements, which lays down the relevant criteria with regard to conditions, monitoring
arrangements and penalties;
26. Considers that, pending the adoption of such framework legislation, an alternative solution would
be the adoption, in accordance with the procedures laid down by the Treaties, of legislation definingprecise objectives for the recovery of waste, established in agreement with producers, monitoring arrange-ments and implementing rules and which would enter into force only if operators in the sector are unableto meet the stipulated objectives through voluntary commitments;
Incineration
27. Considers it essential to support research and the development of new technologies allowing the
recovery of hydrogen chloride and thereby improving the impact of incineration on the environment andhuman health, as well as reducing to a minimum other emissions and the quantity of residues;C 21 E/116 EN 24.1.2002 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 3 April 2001
28. Stresses that there is a substantial difference between soft and hard PVC and it is therefore import-
ant to separate their waste as early as possible, with a view to directing hard PVC waste as a prioritytowards recycling or landfill and soft PVC waste towards incineration, which, due to the lower chlorinecontent in soft PVC, is potentially less dangerous than landfill where there are risks of losses of plasticisers,especially phatalates;
29. Supports, in accordance with the hierarchy of principles established by the European waste manage-
ment strategy, the option of incineration with energy recovery;
30. Proposes that the polluter pays principle be applied in full, thereby charging producers for part of
the additional costs incurred because of the presence of PVC in incinerated waste, and proposes that thisapproach be extended to the processing of other types of waste which entail extra costs;
Landfill
31. Notes that neither incineration nor landfill is a sustainable option for management of waste PVC;
only separate storage of hard PVC can be regarded as a temporary solution in this connection, pendingincreases in recycling capacity;
32. Calls on the Commission to evaluate all available studies of the long-term behaviour of PVC at
dumps in order to be able to judge whether it is safe;
*
**
33. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission.
9. 2002 budget guidelines: Section III
A5-0102/2001
European Parliament resolution on the guidelines for the 2002 budget procedure  Section III 
Commission (2000/2324(BUD))
The European Parliament,
 having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty, Article 177 of the Euratom Treaty and Article 78 of the
ECSC Treaty,
 having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament,
the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary pro-cedure (
1),
 having regard to the report of the Committee on Budget and the opinions of the Committee on
Development and Cooperation, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee onthe Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy, the Committee on Citizens Freedoms and
Rights, Justice and Home Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security
and Defence Policy, the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism, the Committee onAgriculture and Rural Development, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Com-mittee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (A5-0102/2001),
A. whereas European citizens must be more closely involved in the Unions activities,
B. whereas there is a need to reinforce the efficiency and the transparency of the Unions programmes,
C. whereas it is indispensable to aim for a continual balance between the response to the major institu-
tional, macro-economic and geo-political questions and the answers to daily challenges encounteredon an individual level such as environment, employment, equality of opportunity between women andmen, education, the information and knowledge-based society, drugs, social exclusion and food safety,
(1) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.24.1.2002 EN C 21 E/117 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 3 April 2001