18. Considers that there should be consultation at European level as soon as possible on how to use the
digital dividend in order to secure the most favourable conditions for the development of new audiovisualand telecommunications services (HDTV, mobile television and fixed and mobile high-speed services);
19. Stresses that the redistribution of spectrum resources must not be left to the free play of competition
and that appropriate measures must be envisaged to ensure that the frequencies released are used primarilyfor innovatory services offering high quality and diversity of content;
20. Considers that for the purposes of regulation, it is important to ensure that control of electronic
gateways such as electronic programme guides, interactive software or content protection technologies (i.e.
systems for managing digital rights) does not prevent service providers maintaining fair access for their
audiences;
21. Points out that public-service broadcasting has an obligation to ensure access for all; notes that this
remit will become increasingly difficult owing to the fragmentation of distribution networks and methods ofaccess; considers that the provisions on preferential access to distribution networks for services which have auniversal access obligation and, in particular, the ‘must carry ’rules must therefore continue to play an
important role after the transition, and contribute to media pluralism;
Public audiovisual services
22. Stresses that, without appropriate funding, public service broadcasters competing with large groups
—particularly telecommunications groups —entering the audiovisual market will not be able to remain
strong and independent and continue to attract audiences, or generate sufficient resources to fulfil theirremit;
23. Draws attention to the fact that placing a strong and independent public service broadcasting system
in jeopardy involves risks to pluralism, freedom of expression, cultural diversity, access to audiovisual ser-vices and democracy itself;
*
**
24. Instructs it President to forward this resolution to the Council and to the Commission.
P6_TA(2006)0155
A stronger partnership between the European Union and Latin America
European Parliament resolution on a stronger partnership between the European Union and Latin
America (2005/2241(INI))
The European Parliament ,
— having regard to the declarations issued by the three summits of Latin American and Caribbean and
European Union Heads of State or Government held to date in Rio de Janeiro (28 and 29 June 1999),
Madrid (17 and 18 May 2002), and Guadalajara (28 and 29 May 2004),
— having regard to the Luxembourg Declaration adopted at the EU —Rio Group 12th Interministerial
Meeting, held in Luxembourg on 27 May 2005,
— having regard to the Commission's strategy communication to the Council and the European Parliament
entitled ‘A stronger partnership between the European Union and Latin America ’, submitted in
anticipation of the Fourth EU-LAC Summit, which will take place in Vienna on 12 and 13 May 2006(COM(2005)0636),6.12.2006 EN C 296 E/123 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
— having regard to the Final Act of the 17th European Union —Latin America Interparliamentary Con-
ference, held in Lima from 14 to 16 June 2005,
— having regard to its resolution of 15 November 2001 on a global partnership and a common strategy
for relations between the European Union and Latin America (1),
— having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on
Development (A6-0047/2006),
A. whereas at the three above-mentioned summits the Heads of State or Government of the European
Union, Latin America and the Caribbean decided that their ultimate strategic goal was to establish anEU-LAC bi-regional strategic partnership,
B. whereas current relations still fall short of the expectations implicit in a genuine strategic partnership,
whether as regards the political and security aspects or as regards trade, social and budgetary aspects,
C. whereas Latin America, with which it shares a common commitment to human rights, democracy and
multilateralism, is an especially close partner of the Union, which is seeking to consolidate its positionas a global player and has become the main foreign investor in Latin America, the principal donorto the region and the leading trading partner of many countries, in particular those belonging toMercosur,
D. whereas the EU is the biggest development cooperation and humanitarian aid donor in Latin America,
E. whereas according to figures compiled by ECLA (the UN Economic Commission for Latin America), the
economies of the Latin American countries have recorded growth for three years running, grossdomestic product (GDP) having increased by 4,3 % in 2005,
F. whereas per capita GDP in Latin America varies in the region of EUR 2 800, in other words treble that
of China; whereas because of its growing ties with Asia, especially China, and its abundant humanresources and raw material stocks, Latin America is a highly important market for the Union; whereas,despite the currently uneven trading patterns, the Union is emerging as a partner with a key role toplay in Latin America's economic, industrial, scientific, and technological development, since it is help-ing to promote diversification in the region, which also has very close ties with the United States,
G. whereas at present some 45 % of Latin America's population are still living in poverty and are afflicted
by blatant social inequality, discrimination and neglect, the main victims being indigenous populations,women and children, a situation which could obviously undermine democracy and cause societies tofragment, as well as jeopardising economic growth and fuelling social unrest and political instability,
H. acknowledging the substantial efforts made by certain Latin American countries within whose societies
significant progress has been made towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals,
I. greatly welcoming the activities of those countries under South-South solidarity and cooperation
programmes, which are having significant effects in the fields of healthcare, education and action tocombat disability,
J. whereas a number of reports on truth and reconciliation have been produced in different Latin Ameri-
can countries in the aftermath of dictatorial regimes with recommendations which still need to beimplemented in order to establish justice as a basis for the development of democratic societies,
(1) OJ C 140 E, 13.6.2002, p. 569.C 296 E/124 EN 6.12.2006 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
K. whereas a world economic system which is more sensitive to the needs of the least-developed countries
is required if governance and social cohesion are to be improved,
L. whereas the strategic relationship consequently needs to be reactivated, especially within the bedrock of
core areas such as the moves to make relations between the partners truly multilateral, support forregional integration processes and social cohesion in Latin America, migration and improvements tothe institutional machinery of the partnership,
M. whereas the Fourth EU-LAC Summit, to be held in Vienna in May 2006, will afford an excellent oppor-
tunity to revitalise relations and, as far as the Union is concerned, a new opportunity to draw up a self-contained, coherent and comprehensive strategic framework to impart ongoing orderly momentum tothe Union's relations with Latin America and constitute the mainstay of its external action aimed at thatregion,
N. having regard to the additional institutional and development-cooperation support to be derived from
the setting-up of the Ibero-American General Secretariat (SEGIB) at the 15th Ibero-American Summit
(held in Salamanca in October 2005) —a body with its own legal personality which is designed to
support the Ibero-American Conference,
O. whereas it is likewise essential to revitalise the parliamentary dimension of the strategic partnership; and
whereas the best way to do so would be to take a decision without further delay, in Vienna, to set up aEuro-Latin American Transatlantic Assembly to strengthen and rationalise the parliamentary dialogue,
P. whereas it is vital to provide budgetary resources commensurate with the priorities deriving from a
revitalised bi-regional strategic partnership,
1. Congratulates the Commission because, ten years on and on the eve of the Vienna EU-LAC Summit of
Heads of State or Government, it has submitted a new strategy communication that serves to identify andassess the challenges and extraordinary opportunities likely to arise as a genuine bi-regional strategic part-nership is translated into reality;
2. Expresses its satisfaction at the constructive interinstitutional climate which the present Commission,
showing the political awareness, sense of expediency and leadership so vitally needed at this time, has thushelped to bring about; particularly applauds the quality and conscientiousness of the excellent technicalgroundwork evidenced by the above-mentioned Commission communication;
3. Endorses the Austrian Presidency's resolute commitment to strengthening EU-LAC relations, as
reflected in the fact that the Presidency has made the Fourth Summit a high point of its programme;
4. Reaffirms its intention of playing a constructive role in support of the Commission and the current
Presidency and to do its utmost to help make the forthcoming Vienna Summit a real success for all thepartners;
5. Supports the role of the SEGIB as the organiser of the Ibero-American summits and recommends that
a flexible mechanism be established to prepare and monitor EU-LA summits, including the participation ofthe Council Presidency, the Commission, the Senior Officials' Group and the SEGIB, so as to utilise andcoordinate the synergies created by the various partners involved and prevent duplication of resources;
A comprehensive approach to the bi-regional strategic partnership
6. Repeats that it is absolutely essential to have an overall strategic vision of the partnership, which,
ranging beyond isolated proposals or measures, should pursue the ultimate goal of establishing a genuine
political, social, cultural, environmental and security partnership, bringing a Euro-Latin American area of
global interregional partnership into being in the medium term, and launching a real partnership in thesocial field and in the spheres of knowledge and joint action to bring about sustainable development;
7. Endorses the Commission's aims and the reasons it sets out for strengthening relations, although it
would have preferred the ultimate objectives of the Commission's proposals and recommendations to bespelt out more explicitly along the lines of the preceding paragraph;6.12.2006 EN C 296 E/125 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
8. Supports the Commission's proposals for stepping up and focusing political dialogue, but repeats that
a stronger political and security partnership must be built in addition on a Euro-Latin American Charter forPeace and Security, to enable practical expression to be given, under the terms of the United NationsCharter, to policy, strategy, and security proposals of interest to the two regions, on the work of a bi-regional conflict prevention centre and on new institutional machinery, including
(a) a Euro-Latin American Transatlantic Assembly, whose membership should be drawn in equal numbers
from Members of the European Parliament on the one hand and, on the other, from the Latin Ameri-can Parliament (Parlatino), the Central American Parliament (Parlacen), the Andean Parliament (Parland-ino) and the EU-Mexico and EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committees;
(b) a Euro-Latin American Permanent Secretariat to encourage partnership activities between summits;
(c) updating of the ministerial-level political dialogue, including frequent meetings of the Defence, Justice
and Internal Affairs, Social Affairs, Environment and Development Ministers, etc.;
(d) systematic attempts to seek a Euro-Latin American consensus in the various international organisations
and negotiations, first and foremost in the United Nations and the World Trade Organization;
(e) a regular bi-regional dialogue between local and regional governments under the auspices of the Com-
mittee of the Regions;
(f) a regular bi-regional entrepreneurial dialogue established on an official footing and appropriate involve-
ment of trade-union organisations and civil society in monitoring the agreements;
9. Supports the Commission's recommendation that the political dialogue be adjusted in line with the
needs of the different partners at bi-regional, subregional, or bilateral level and that it be confined to alimited number of topics, including reform of the United Nations and peacekeeping; also considers that
the dialogue needs to be broadened to cover other subjects of mutual interest such as respect for human
rights, democratic governance and the fight against poverty, terrorism and drug trafficking, and that specificdialogues on social cohesion, the environmental aspect of sustainable development, social justice and wor-kers' rights and migration and human interaction are also essential;
10. Supports the Commission's proposal that a political dialogue on conflict prevention and crisis man-
agement be placed on the new political agenda, but suggests that the dialogue should also encompass
European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) matters as a whole and be organised around the Euro-Latin
American Charter for Peace and Security and the work of a bi-regional conflict prevention centre to be setup in Latin America, since this would be the best way to exchange shared experiences and bolster andcoordinate efforts involving the countries and regional bodies concerned, including in particular the Organ-ization of American States (OAS) and the Rio Group;
11. Considers that, if there is a delay in reaching agreement on the abovementioned Euro-Latin American
Charter for Peace and Security —as occurred with similar ventures in other geographical areas —efforts
should be made to ensure that the other measures and objectives under the strengthened partnership arenot held up by the failure to reach agreement;
12. Considers that the purpose of the bi-regional conflict prevention centre should be the early detection
of causes of potential violence and armed conflicts, with a view to preventing such conflicts or theirpossible escalation at an early stage;
13. Reiterates its belief that dialogue between the two regions paves the way for tackling a common
challenge, strengthens and bolsters multilateralism in global politics and at the same time increases LatinAmerica's political weight in international fora and organisations;
14. Reaffirms its belief that the internal stability of many Latin American partner countries continues
nonetheless to depend on reform of state structures and specifically on modernisation of representativemachinery, institutions, and political parties, on the integration of groups such as indigenous peoples intodecision-making procedures and on greater democratic governance;C 296 E/126 EN 6.12.2006 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
15. Applauds the Commission for coming out in favour of setting up the Euro-Latin American Trans-
atlantic Assembly at the Vienna Summit, since this will help to consolidate democratic governance andstrengthen the parliamentary dimension of the partnership; calls on the Fourth Summit to provide expresslyin the Final Act or ‘Vienna undertaking ’for the setting-up of the Assembly as proposed by the Euro-Latin
American joint parliamentary bodies, with the membership being drawn in equal numbers from theMembers of the European Parliament on the one hand and, on the other, from the Parlatino, the Parlacen,the Parlandino, the Mercosur Joint Parliamentary Committee and the EU-Mexico and EU-Chile Joint Parlia-mentary Committees;
16. Proposes that the Euro-Latin American Transatlantic Assembly (Eurolat) be made the parliamentary
body of the strategic partnership and be provided with the following advisory and review powers:
(a) a parliamentary forum to debate and scrutinise matters related to the strategic partnership, which the
Assembly should support in order to consolidate and develop it;
(b) supervision and parliamentary control to be brought to bear on association agreements already in force
or being negotiated or revised, allowing the joint parliamentary committees provided for in the agree-ments to be involved wherever appropriate;
(c) adoption of resolutions, recommendations and acts addressed to EU-LAC summits and the various joint
ministerial bodies, including the Rio Group and the San José process;
17. Calls on Latin American partner countries specifically to enter into explicit commitments designed to
strengthen the direct legitimacy of all joint regional parliamentary assemblies by seeking as quickly as poss-ible to enable their members to be elected by direct universal suffrage;
18. Proposes enhancing the role of local and regional governments in promoting public decentralised
cooperation initiatives which are aimed at people at grassroots level and designed to improve their welfare;also proposes strengthening instruments intended to build on experience acquired through bi-regional linksand exchanges undertaken to date;
19. Renews its call for a proper role for civil society (NGOs, business, associations, universities, trade
unions, etc.), since this will enable society as a whole to be more fully involved in monitoring the activitiesand benefits resulting from a stronger partnership;
20. Considers it essential, if the partnership is to run smoothly, that a Euro-Latin American entrepre-
neurial forum, consisting of representatives of employers' organisations and of European and Latin Ameri-can small, medium-sized and large enterprises, should work to promote trade and encourage investment ofevery kind in the two regions;
21. Repeats its proposal for a Euro-Latin American area of global interregional partnership to be set up
in the medium term, proceeding in two stages:
(a) the negotiations on the EU-Mercosur association agreement should be concluded in Vienna; negoti-
ations on individual association agreements with the Andean Community (CAN) and Central Americashould begin; the new Generalised System of Preferences (GSP ‘plus’) should be applied to all parties
concerned and utmost benefit should be derived from its advantages, until such time as the aboveagreements have entered into force, and existing EU-Mexico and EU-Chile agreements should be streng-thened to enable their potential to be tapped to the full;
(b) a comprehensive interregional association agreement should be secured by 2010 in order to provide a
legal basis and full geographical scope for the different aspects of the bi-regional partnership and topursue the ultimate goal of gradual reciprocal liberalisation, on a bilateral preferential basis, of trade inevery category of goods and services (subject to the restrictions appropriate to economic services of
general interest) within the bi-regional bloc, in accordance with WTO rules;
22. Endorses the Commission's recommendations aimed at creating a favourable climate for trade and
investment flows between the two regions by consolidating the WTO multilateral trading system, streng-thening the existing agreements with Mexico and Chile, negotiating association and free-trade agreementswith Mercosur, the Andean Community (CAN), Central America and the Caribbean countries, and facilitat-ing access to the European market for Latin American exports by applying tariff preferences and exemptionsfrom duty under the GSP ‘plus’system;6.12.2006 EN C 296 E/127 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
23. Believes that the conclusion of the European Union-Mercosur agreements and the opening of negoti-
ations with CAN and Central America at the forthcoming Vienna Summit will help make the summit moresuccessful and give a significant boost to relations between the European Union and Latin America;
24. Points out that, in view of the disappointing outcome of the Hong Kong Ministerial Conference,
‘WTO conditionality ’has become irrelevant for the purposes of the present brief to negotiate with Mercosur
and even more so for the purposes of the future briefs for the negotiations with CAN and Central America;
maintains that in the current circumstances it is instead more feasible to finalise an agreement with Mer-cosur containing an agricultural chapter compatible with the timetable and the 2013 cut-off date agreed inHong Kong, which allow transitional periods to be laid down by mutual agreement;
25. Calls for the briefs to negotiate the new association agreements with the Andean and Central Ameri-
can communities to omit any clause whereby conclusion of the agreements would depend on completion ofthe WTO round negotiations, notwithstanding the guarantee that the future free trade area would in the endbe fully compatible with WTO provisions; calls on the Commission and the Council to consult Parliamenton the negotiating directives before they are finally approved by the Council;
26. Recommends that the bilateral and interregional agreements currently in force or in the process
of negotiation be placed within an overarching multilateral context with a view to promoting regionalintegration and internal trade so as to enable their provisions to be incorporated in due course into theproposed comprehensive bi-regional association agreement;
27. Restates its belief that, as well as on the economic and trade aspects of the future agreements,
emphasis should likewise be laid on the qualitative importance of their political, social, and cultural com-ponents, and those linked to migration and sustainable development; considers it essential to take the stepsrequired to establish a suitable relationship between free trade and social cohesion;
28. Advises the Summit to ensure that the strengthening of relations between the two regions in the
transnational business sphere takes into account the sensitivities which certain practices may awaken ingiven areas and sectors, and to favour ethically-based investment;
29. Supports the Commission's proposal that the stronger EU-LAC strategic partnership should be
deemed to encompass the entire body of relations by which the Caribbean countries are linked to theUnion and to their Central and South American partners under the series of Lomé Conventions and thesuccessor Cotonou Agreement, and in particular through Cariforum (the Forum of Caribbean States) and byvirtue both of the fact that Caricom (the Caribbean Common Market) belongs to the Rio Group and of theirattendance at the EU-LAC summits; urges the Commission to explore this avenue further in its forthcomingcommunication;
30. Considers that the Commission has produced particularly apt proposals to promote the role of
European high-tech sectors in the development of Latin America and the Caribbean under the researchand technological development framework programmes, including the expanded ‘@LIS ’information-society
programme and the ‘Galileo ’navigation system, which will have a particular impact on maritime and air
safety;
31. Repeats its proposals intended to achieve a genuine partnership in the social field and in the spheres
of knowledge and joint action to bring about sustainable development, employing various measures and
resources, for example:
— launching a resolute, generous development cooperation policy focusing on the common objective of
attaining the Millennium Development Goals by 2015;
— purposefully opening up EU markets step by step, in keeping with the aims laid down in the association
agreements;
— setting up a bi-regional solidarity fund and a ‘Latin America facility ’;
— adopting a specific legislative framework to regulate the Union's cooperation with Latin America
according to a differentiated approach;C 296 E/128 EN 6.12.2006 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
— widening the scope of EU vocational training, education, cultural, health and migration-related pro-
grammes, so as to enable Latin American countries to benefit therefrom;
— promoting scientific and technical cooperation programmes and exchange programmes for scientists,
engineers and students;
— supporting institutional and fiscal reform programmes;
— allocating financial support for the launch of the Andean Bio-Diversity Institute called for at the 17th
EU-LA Interparliamentary Conference;
— promoting regional markets and fair trade projects;
— allocating budget resources commensurate with stated ambitions;
considers it vital, as regards the last point, that in its future budget proposals the Commission should put
forward ambitious options that will not invariably oblige Parliament to battle with the Council in order toraise the initial draft budget;
32. Considers it essential to give a generous new boost to the Union's development cooperation policy
towards Latin America, in which poverty eradication and measures to combat social inequality shouldbecome a key element; stresses the importance of placing the emphasis on developing fiscal policies andpromoting social cohesion alongside determined action to promote basic education and health (which arekey elements in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals), especially where vulnerable groupssuch as women and children, ethnic minorities and indigenous groups are concerned;
33. Stresses that the cooperation and development aid policy should have a targeted approach taking
into account the various economic and social conditions and level of development of the countries ofLatin America; considers it vital, however, to support middle-income countries in the region in combatingpoverty, promoting social cohesion and achieving the Millennium Development Goals, through all meansavailable, including economic cooperation in areas of mutual interest;
34. Agrees that aid should be tailored to the needs of the countries concerned; notes, however, that
certain proposed cooperation sectors, such as the fields of migration, counter-terrorism and combating illicitdrugs, constitute areas of more urgent priority to donors than to beneficiaries; insists that cooperation insuch areas must not be to the detriment of poverty-focused measures;
35. Points out that poverty and hunger are complex and multidimensional problems and that all coun-
tries share a responsibility for combating them; also urges governments to adopt direct measures to elimin-
ate them by stepping up employment and income generation programmes, thereby supporting sustainableeconomic growth which allows for more efficient social security systems offering secure and higherpensions;
36. Emphasises the need for greater cooperation with Latin American countries which have not only
succeeded within their own societies in progressing towards achievement of the Millennium DevelopmentGoals but are also playing a leading role in generating extensive South-South cooperation and mutualsupport;
37. Points out that budget support is most effective when targeted at specific sectors; insists that
minimum conditions of public finance management be a prerequisite for all budget support and thataccompanying measures be invariably included;
38. Applauds the Commission's proposal that an ‘EU-LAC common area of higher education ’be estab-
lished as a matter of priority, but regards as insufficiently ambitious the aim of welcoming no more thanabout 4 000 Latin American students and teachers to European universities in the period from 2007 to2013; maintains that, to produce a real impact on the cultural and political mores of such a vast region,the above figure should be at least trebled; stresses that special attention must also be paid to basic edu-cation, in order to meet the needs of the poorest sectors of Latin American society;6.12.2006 EN C 296 E/129 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
39. Strongly supports the Commission's proposals to intensify the transfer of knowledge and good prac-
tice regarding cultural cooperation between all the partners involved, and to organise a ‘Europe Week ’
centring on 9 May in all the Latin American countries, aided by the work of the Commission delegationsand in close collaboration with the embassies of the Member States;
40. Considers it essential to take additional steps to foster much more exhaustive mutual understanding,
for instance by improving the information on the Commission web page and disseminating it in Spanishand Portuguese, including newsgroups and electronic bulletins on the page, and by providing more activesupport to centres and institutes which are involved in the study of EU-LA relations (OREAL, Celare, theEU-LA Observatory on Decentralised Cooperation, the Institute of Ibero-American and Portuguese Studies,etc.) or which could play an important role in raising awareness of the true picture in the two regions (theBiarritz Forum, the Goethe-Institut, the Instituto Cervantes, the Carolina Foundation, the British Council, theAlliance Française, etc.);
41. Proposes that a Euro-Latin American foundation be set up to foster dialogue between the partners
across the public-private divide, modelled on those existing for other geographical areas —Asia and the
Mediterranean, for example —and calls on the Commission to draw up a specific proposal to enable this
idea to be translated into practice;
42. Considers it essential to substantially improve the information capacities of the network of Commis-
sion delegations, undoubtedly one of the most effective and best informed external services in the world,with a view to deepening the above-mentioned mutual understanding; undertakes to ensure that parliament-ary diplomacy will play a more important role as an additional tool, using its network of standing parlia-
mentary delegations and ad hoc delegations to interparliamentary conferences; proposes that parliamentary
liaison units staffed by European Parliament officials be set up within the main Commission delegations inthe region;
43. Points out that the growing rise in the production, trafficking and use of drugs —and especially
cocaine —all over the world and in Europe itself, with its familiar consequence (namely the spread of
organised crime, illegal arms trafficking, corruption and money-laundering) is severely damaging all theEuro-Latin American partners and demands a resolute strategy to tackle its pernicious effects throughencouragement for alternative crops, although without penalising small-scale farmers manipulated by drugtraffickers;
44. Endorses the Commission's aim of continuing to help Latin America fight drugs and seeking to
strengthen security and stability on both sides by pursuing an approach based on shared responsibility inall areas and bodies where drug enforcement is concerned;
45. Supports the work done by the Co-Presidencies of Costa Rica and Austria under the EU-LAC Coor-
dination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs, in a joint effort to strengthen its role as a catalyst forinitiatives, programmes and projects to prevent and reduce the consumption, production and illegal traffick-ing of drugs, on the basis of the principle of shared responsibility between the two regions;
46. Reiterates the need for the action plan designed to ensure cooperation with specific projects under
the mechanism in relation to the priorities of the Panama Plan and its main elements to be as efficient aspossible;
47. Supports the Commission's proposal to promote good financial, fiscal, and judicial governance by
means of financial incentives to be laid down under specific agreements with the Latin American countries;calls on the partner countries to adopt sound, effective policies on democratic governance, social issues,public finances and taxation, with a view to increasing social cohesion and reducing poverty, inequalityand marginalisation;C 296 E/130 EN 6.12.2006 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
48. Repeats its proposals to complement the action mentioned above with specific practical measures to
combat drug trafficking, organised crime and small-arms trafficking through new training and exchangeprogrammes for members of judicial and law enforcement authorities (EuroLatinFor), and programmes toencourage the approximation of laws, so as to ensure that the offences in question are actually prosecuted,without in any way encroaching on the sovereignty of the countries concerned (EuroLatinLex);
49. Calls on the Commission, to that end, to include the European Code of Conduct on Arms Exports in
the‘political dialogue ’chapter of the bi-regional agenda;
50. Strongly supports the Commission's proposals to promote sustainable development in both regions,
including a specific dialogue on the environmental aspects thereof, preparatory meetings of EnvironmentMinisters to be held before summits, and in-depth consultations in the different international forums, focus-ing in particular on climate change and sound management of water resources;
51. Invites the parties to rigorously apply the international conventions on the environment, climate
change and biodiversity;
52. Calls on the Commission to vigorously enforce its instruments for preventing the plundering of
natural resources in the case of Latin America, including the FLEGT programme (Forest Law Enforcement,
Governance and Trade), in order to prevent in particular the importation of illegal timber;
53. Calls on the Summit to draw up joint strategies and emergency, warning, and preparedness measures
to reduce the vulnerability of all the partners to the natural disasters caused by climate change and thevarious related phenomena, including volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and floods, which in 2005 in LatinAmerica alone claimed a toll of thousands of lives and over six billion dollars' worth of damage, according
to ECLA figures;
54. Urges the Commission to ensure that the social-issues agenda includes discussions designed to bring
about an improvement in working conditions, especially for farm workers, in keeping with the internationallabour standards disseminated by the International Labour Organization, and to treat this as part and parcelof sustainable development in Latin America;
The Vienna Summit: revitalising the bi-regional strategic partnership
55. Recommends that the Vienna Summit make a limited number of verifiable clear-cut commitments
serving to lend new impetus to the strategic partnership in four main areas: joint action to bring about
effective multilateralism; a decisive boost to regional integration processes in Latin America; and specificcommitments regarding social cohesion and migration and human interaction;
(A) Joint action to bring about effective multilateralism
56. Maintains that a genuine strategic partnership must be based on realistic aims and common agendas
shaped by the shared advocacy of multilateralism which informs the external action of the Euro-LatinAmerican partners (the Kyoto Protocol, the International Criminal Court, the fight against the death penaltyand against terrorism, the central role of the United Nations system, etc.);
57. Points to the excellent opportunities for joint action afforded in multilateral forums regarding matters
such as reform of the United Nations, monitoring of the agreements reached at the ‘Millennium +5 Summit ’
held in New York in September 2005, the proceedings of the new Peacebuilding Commission and theHuman Rights Council, disarmament and the non-proliferation of weapons, the information society andInternet governance, the new configuration of the international financial system ,including reform of the
IMF, the WTO Doha Development Agenda, or strengthening the UN's humanitarian response capacity;6.12.2006 EN C 296 E/131 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
58. Points out that effective multilateralism requires continental-scale players speaking with one voice to
determinedly assert their values and interests in a globalised world and that at present the role of the tworegions on the international stage is not commensurate with their political and economic weight; looks,therefore, to all the partners to make a much more purposeful effort to harmonise their positions amongthemselves and in relation to the outside world;
59. Reaffirms the commitment made at Guadalajara (consistent, moreover, with European security stra-
tegy) to strengthening regional organisations, this being an essential means of achieving the true multilat-
eralism which lies at the heart of Union external action and of its inception and raison d'être ;
60. Considers that the relationship must continue to be viewed as a unified whole so as not to under-
mine the intrinsic nature of the strategic partnership or destroy or slow the momentum of the regionalintegration processes; advocates variable dialogue arrangements to allow for the circumstances in the dif-ferent partner countries without impairing the overall vision implied in regional integration;
61. Points out that the association agreements in force or about to be concluded offer exceptional oppor-
tunities for intensifying relations of every kind between the Union as such and its Latin American partners;recognises that Member States can give priority to their relations with certain Latin American partners,provided that this is done on a purely bilateral basis without in any way infringing or breaking faith withUnion policy and powers;
62. Considers it essential for the two regions to play an active part in the collective international security
system organised within the United Nations;
(B) A decisive boost to regional integration processes in Latin America
63. Welcomes the fact that the Commission is continuing to view regional integration as a priority area
for development assistance to Latin America, and supports its proposals aimed at strengthening regionalintegration processes whereby the negotiations on the association agreement with Mercosur are to be con-cluded without further delay, at the Vienna Summit, and negotiations are to open immediately on individualagreements of the same type with CAN and Central America;
64. Notes that the prospect of an association agreement with the Union has in itself already been instru-
mental in inducing the Andean and Central American countries to press ahead with the various aspects ofeconomic integration, especially where the customs union and customs procedures are concerned; believesthat these advances will gather pace when the future agreements are being negotiated and that the agree-ments will thus constitute tangible and decisive support for regional integration in Latin America;
65. Calls on the Commission to keep a close watch on the possible accession of new members and
changes in the make-up, or convergence, of the distinct subregional integration systems in Latin America;maintains that any changes in the shape of subregional machinery must be aimed in every case at fosteringcloser regional integration as opposed to undermining the existing arrangements;
66. Proposes that the Vienna Summit move forward with a longer-term strategy aimed at achieving a
comprehensive interregional association agreement and establishing a Euro-Latin American area of globalinterregional partnership in the medium term; recommends accordingly that a feasibility study on bothinitiatives be put in hand at Vienna;
67. Points out that the European experience shows that regional integration contributes decisively to
economic growth and modernisation of production systems, trade expansion, international market pen-
etration, social cohesion and, in the final analysis, political stability;
68. Backs the Commission's proposals intended to support territorial integration in Latin America and
interconnection of its various infrastructure networks, especially where energy, water, transport, telecom-munications, and research are concerned; urges the European Investment Bank (EIB) to provide substantialaid under the heading of the ‘Latin America facility ’referred to below;C 296 E/132 EN 6.12.2006 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
69. Calls on the Commission to draw up a broader strategy to promote integration above and beyond
trade commitments, laying emphasis also on non-trading aspects such as regional security and democraticgovernance, movements of persons and workers, joint management of ecosystems and river basins, andphysical integration and infrastructure;
70. Considers cross-border cooperation to be a clear necessity where regional integration processes are
concerned, as has been shown in the EU, and consequently recommends that means be put in place tosupport this type of practice;
71. Calls on the Commission to launch a multi-annual programme for cooperation with the SEGIB,
funded by the necessary budget, in order to tap the full potential to be gained from mutual cooperationby pursuing institutional cooperation, technical assistance, exchange and training programmes relating to
regional integration, and policies concerning development cooperation, preparations for summits and per-
manent local follow-up thereto;
(C) Specific commitments regarding social cohesion
72. Unreservedly endorses the Commission proposal to encompass the aim of social cohesion in an
ongoing, coherent and practical fashion within all the initiatives undertaken in partnership with LatinAmerica; maintains that the Euro-Latin American partners are engaged in a common project in which amarket economy and social cohesion should not be opposing forces but should complement each other;insists that relevant action be focused on the reduction of social inequalities and the inclusion of groups thatare currently marginalised from mainstream society and excluded from opportunities, with particular atten-tion being paid to the needs (of whatever kind) of indigenous peoples;
73. Points out that, in Latin America, democratic governance and social cohesion are closely linked, as
can be inferred from the report on democracy in Latin America compiled by the United Nations Devel-opment Programme in 2004 and from that year's annual report of the OAS Inter-American Commission onHuman Rights;
74. Supports, therefore, the Commission's recommendations for a specific dialogue to be established on
social cohesion; for social cohesion to be treated as a priority in development cooperation; for cooperationwith international institutions to be intensified; for the different stakeholders involved to be encouraged toparticipate; and, in particular, for a forum for social cohesion to be held every two years and attended bygovernment authorities, civil society, the private sector, and international organisations, with a view toaddressing, among other things, the high degree of urban sprawl and the related social and security prob-lems;
75. Calls on the partners to pursue joint initiatives and to hold more frequent social forums bringing
together the business world, workers, consumers and civil society, on the one hand at the level of the EUand Latin America as such and on the other within the different countries; calls on the European Economicand Social Committee to intensify its activities in this area and to pass on its experience to the Latin
American partners; in this connection, welcomes the positive contributions made by the Civil Society
Forums meeting alongside the Summits;
76. Recommends that the growing revenue from oil and other resources should, as a matter of priority,
be channelled into sustainable long-term training and infrastructure programmes with a view to improvingcompetitiveness and the employment situation;
77. Repeats its proposal for the setting-up of a bi-regional solidarity fund for the purpose of managing
and financing sector-based programmes relating initially to the eradication of social exclusion and extremepoverty and to health, education and infrastructures in the countries and regions where per capita income islower and social inequalities are greater, and subsequently covering the Latin American countries as a whole;6.12.2006 EN C 296 E/133 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
78. Is of the opinion that a modest injection of funds for Latin America, to be contributed from, or
reallocated from within, the Union budget and not constituting an additional allocation, could act as acatalyst which, if combined with the budgetary resources earmarked by other bodies (the EIB, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Andean Development Corporation, the Central American Bank for Econ-omic Iintegration, the World Bank, etc.) and the countries concerned, could provide the budgetary supportneeded to create sufficient critical mass to help alleviate the problems;
79. Recommends that the above-mentioned fund be coordinated by the Commission (or, where appro-
priate, the SEGIB) in collaboration with donor bodies and countries and that it also include a ‘Latin America
facility ’based on exclusively financial contributions from the EIB and other institutions concerned; calls on
Latin American financial institutions to support territorial integration and infrastructure interconnection inLatin America in sectors such as energy, water, transport, telecommunications and research;
80. Renews its call on the Commission and the Council to encourage the bodies mentioned above to act
to set up the solidarity fund; calls on the Vienna Summit to support the project and to launch the necessaryfeasibility study without delay;
81. Recommends that the Latin American countries concert their planning with a view to interconnect-
ing the above infrastructure and set up ‘energy rings ’, drawing whenever necessary on European experience
with the trans-European networks;
82. Reaffirms the Guadalajara commitment to strengthening the decentralised approach forming the
basis of the European development cooperation programmes (URB-AL, AL-INVEST, @LIS, ALFA, ALBAN);also urges that local and regional governments be encouraged to take part in the EUROsociAL initiative, aregional programme for social cohesion in Latin America;
83. Recommends that the Commission support the introduction of mechanisms to correct disparities in
social and territorial cohesion (to be incorporated into Latin America's regional integration agreements) andthat it promote action to combat corruption and to encourage tax and fiscal discipline;
84. Points out that the dialogue and the social cohesion programmes must pay heed to the gender
inequalities clearly apparent as regards access to employment, access to education and women's participationin decision-making;
85. Calls upon the Vienna Summit to condemn trafficking in human beings and the murder of and
violence against women, and to promote and uphold all relevant national and international law; proposesa comprehensive priority-action programme for children and teenagers in Latin America, modelled onUNICEF activities;
86. Proposes that the partner countries and the various bilateral and multilateral creditors devise gener-
ous, imaginative ways of dealing with the debt issue; in this connection, draws attention to the initiativesconcerned with converting debt by means of social and educational investment which have been aired atIbero-American Summits;
(D) Verifiable clear-cut commitments regarding migration and human interaction
87. Points again to the need, as regards relations between the partners, to pursue innovative migration
policies, respecting fundamental rights, in accordance with the international agreements in force, and humandignity, and fighting discrimination, racism and xenophobia, without encroaching on the sovereignty of thecountries concerned;
88. Considers migration and human interaction to be a key area of the Union's relations with its Latin
American partners; maintains that the approach to be adopted should be balanced, comprehensive andcoherent, encompassing policies to combat illegal migration and at the same time, in collaboration withthe countries concerned, emphasising the advantages of legal migration, and that it should arise fromdialogue and fair-minded cooperation suited to the circumstances of each country involved and be backedby sufficient budgetary resources, in keeping with the conclusions reached at the Brussels European Councilof 15 and 16 December 2005;C 296 E/134 EN 6.12.2006 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006
89. Deplores the Commission's failure to produce specific proposals for the Summit; proposes that,
proceeding from the Commission Communication of 30 November 2005 entitled ‘Priority actions for
responding to the challenges of migration: First follow-up to Hampton Court ’(COM(2005)0621) and as
part of the long-term process initiated by the Hague programme to respond to the opportunities andchallenges arising from migration and of the decisions taken at the informal Hampton Court meeting, theCouncil should, as soon as possible, adopt specific priority measures for Latin America along the lines ofthe conclusions reached at the above-mentioned Brussels European Council as regards Africa and the Medi-terranean;
90. Reaffirms that the above measures should cover a range of matters, for example regulation of
migration, by strengthening bilateral agreements and including the fight against illegal migration and themafias that exploit it and against people-trafficking, especially where vulnerable groups are concerned, inparticular women and children, joint migration management, temporary immigration policies, the introduc-tion of a special short-stay travel visa for entrepreneurs, university teachers, researchers, students, journalistsand trade unionists involved in the partnership, the use of immigration to foster development in countriesof origin (assistance for immigrants' projects in their countries of origin etc.), integration policies to belaunched in host countries for the benefit of legal immigrants, and, lastly, funding and monitoring of themeasures undertaken;
91. Proposes that the partner countries take suitable action in order to reduce the current excessive costs
incurred by emigrants in transferring remittances;
*
**
92. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments
and parliaments of the European Union Member States and of all the countries of Latin America and theCaribbean, and to the Latin American Parliament, the Central American Parliament, the Andean Parliamentand the Mercosur Joint Parliamentary Committee.
P6_TA(2006)0156
EC-Mauritania Sea Fisheries Agreement *
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclu-sion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters concerning the amendments to theProtocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in theAgreement on cooperation in the sea fisheries sector between the European Community and theIslamic Republic of Mauritania for the period 1 August 2001 to 31 July 2006 (COM(2005)0591 —
C6-0433/2005 —2005/0229(CNS))
(Consultation procedure)
The European Parliament ,
— having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation (COM(2005)0591) (
1),
— having regard to Articles 37 and 300(2) of the EC Treaty,
— having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council
consulted Parliament (C6-0433/2005),
— having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A6-0066/2006),
(1) Not yet published in OJ.6.12.2006 EN C 296 E/135 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 27 April 2006