34. Asks that the Commission, within the framework of cooperation with countries with which the
Community has signed international fisheries agreements, should consider aid to improve the safety ofboats and life-saving equipment, as well as vocational training and should devise a policy for internationalcooperation in this respect;
35. Urges the Commission to include the social aspects, in particular those relating to safety and work-
ing conditions, in the regulation on the reform of the common fisheries policy for 2002;
36. Calls for greater coordination between maritime communications centres and services, with the
strengthening and modernising of their existing technical and human resources and between Europeanradio-medical centres in order to facilitate the permanent exchange of information in real time regardingmedical treatment, as provided for by Directive 92/29/EEC, so as to improve techniques for radio diagnosisand telemedicine as well as sea rescue. This should be carried out through specific pilot plans;
37. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments
of the Member States, the International Maritime Organisation, the International Labour Organisation andthe FAO.
25. Professional fees
B5-0247/2001
European Parliament resolution on scale fees and compulsory tariffs for certain liberal professions,
in particular lawyers, and on the particular role and position of the liberal professions in modern
society
The European Parliament,
 having regard to Articles 6, 52, 81 and 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
 having regard to Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February
1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State otherthan that in which the qualification was obtained (
1),
 having regard to Directive 77/249/EEC of 22 March 1977 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers
of freedom to provide services (2),
 having regard to Council Directive 85/384/EEC of 10 June 1985 on the mutual recognition of diplo-
mas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, including measures tofacilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services (
3),
 having regard to the Eighth Council Directive of 10 April 1984 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty
on the approval of persons responsible for carrying out the statutory audits of accounting documents
(84/253/EEC) (4),
 having regard to Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition
of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at leastthree years duration (
5),
(1) OJ L 77, 14.3.1998, p. 36.
(2) OJ L 78, 26.3.1977, p. 17.
(3) OJ L 223, 21.8.1985, p. 15; last amended by Directive 90/658/EEC and the Act of Accession (A/F/S) of 1994.
(4) OJ L 126, 12.5.1984, p. 20.
(5) OJ L 19, 24.1.1989, p. 16.C 21 E/364 EN 24.1.2002 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 5 April 2001
 having regard to the Commission Decision of 30 June 1993 relating to a proceeding pursuant to
Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/33.407  CNSD) (1),
 having regard to the Commission Decision of 30 January 1995 relating to a proceeding under Arti-
cle 85 of the EC Treaty (IV/33.686  Coapi) (2),
 having regard to the Commission decision of 7 April 1999 in Case No IV/36.147  EPI code of
conduct (3),
 having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of 18 June 1998 in Case C-35/96 (4), Commis-
sion of the European Communities/Italian Republic,
 having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of 30 January 1985 in Case C-123/83, BNIC/
Clair (5),
 having regard to the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 28 March 2001 in Case T-144/99,
Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office v Commission of the Euro-pean Communities,
 having regard to the Commission interpretative communication of 9 December 1993 concerning the
free movement of services across frontiers (93/C/334/03),
 having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament of
29 December 2000 on an Internal Market Strategy for Services (COM(2000) 888),
A. whereas the liberal professions are one of the pillars of pluralism and independence in society and
fulfil roles in the public interest, and the legal profession in particular is one of the pillars of theprotection of the fundamental right to defence and the putting into effect of the principle of the ruleof law,
B. whereas in some Member States there are compulsory tariffs which lay down the minimum and/or
maximum amounts to be paid by clients for services provided by liberal professions,
C. whereas, according to the case-law of the Court of Justice, lawyers, and pari passu members of other
liberal professions, are undertakings which are subject to competition rules,
D. whereas the case-law of the Court of Justice does not prevent Member States from establishing com-
pulsory tariffs (
6) because Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty apply only to anti-competitive conduct
engaged in by undertakings on their own initiative. If anti-competitive conduct is required of under-takings by national legislation or if the latter creates a legal framework which itself eliminates anypossibility of competitive activity on their part, Articles 81 and 82 do not apply. In such a situation,the restriction of competition is not attributable, as those provisions implicitly require, to the auton-omous conduct of the undertakings (
7), whereas Articles 81 and 82 may apply, however, if it is found
that the national legislation does not preclude undertakings from engaging in autonomous conductwhich prevents, restricts or distorts competition,
1. Considers that liberal professions are the expression of a democratic fundamental order based on law
and, more particularly, an essential element of European societies and communities in their various forms;
(1) OJ L 203, 13.8.1993, p. 27.
(2) OJ L 122, 2.6.1995, p. 37.
(3) OJ L 106, 23.4.1999, p. 14.
(4) European Court Reports 1998, p. I-3851.
(5) European Court Reports 1995, p. 391.
(6) See Case C-185/91 Reiff [1993] ECR I-5801, paragraphs 17 and 19; Case C-153/93 Delta Schiffahrts- und Spedi-
tionsgesellschaft [1994] ECR I-2517, paragraphs 16 and 18; and Joined Cases C-140/94 to C-142/94 DIP andOthers [1995] ECR I-3257, paragraphs 18 and 19).
(
7) Judgment of the Court of 11 November 1997. Joined cases C-359/95 P and C-379/95 P. European Court Reports
1997, p. I-6265.24.1.2002 EN C 21 E/365 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 5 April 2001
2. Considers the importance of regulations, satisfying the requirements of Articles 81 and 82 of the
Treaty establishing the European Community, that are established under their own responsibility by pro-fessional groups to guarantee the quality of services, to fix special standards of value, to observe thoseregulations in a professional manner and to include professional ethics;
3. Notes the high qualifications required for liberal professions, the need to protect those that distin-
guish liberal professions to the benefit of European citizens and the need to establish a specific relationshipbased on trust between liberal professions and their clients;
4. Considers that diversities rooted in culture, legal history, sociology and ethnology of the various
professional groups in the Member States need to be respected by application of the principle of subsidiar-ity;
5. Recognises that the manifestation of traditional values of the liberal professions must adapt to the
changing business world and the needs of the modern consumer;
6. Calls on the Commission to keep a close eye on the rules adopted and the decisions taken by
associations of members of liberal professions which make it difficult for nationals of other Member Statesto provide services freely;
7. Recognises the importance attached in some Member States to compulsory tariffs with a view to
providing high-quality services to citizens and to creating a trustful relationship between liberal professionsand their clients;
8. Calls upon the European Commission to follow strictly the interpretation of the Court of Justice in
the application of competition rules to the compulsory tariffs of liberal professions;
9. Considers that only compulsory tariffs established by professional bodies or associations of all
members of a given profession may, according to the circumstances, be regarded as decisions adopted byassociations of undertakings subject to competition rules;
10. Considers that Member States are authorised to establish compulsory tariffs taking into account the
general interest (and not only the interest of the profession), and to protect the high moral, ethical andquality standards that lawyers, tax consultants, accountants, doctors, psychotherapists, architects andmembers of other liberal professions represent and their clients trust in;
11. Considers that the goal of promoting competition in the professions must, in each individual case,
be reconciled with the objective of maintaining purely ethical rules specific to each profession;
12. Points out that rules which are necessary, in the specific context of each profession, in order to
ensure the impartiality, competence, integrity and responsibility of the members of that profession or toprevent conflicts of interest and misleading advertising, and which, in addition, do not represent barriers tothe free movement of services, are not considered to be restrictions of competition within the meaning ofArticle 81(1) of the Treaty;
13. Calls upon the Commission, within the scope of the new Internal Market Strategy for Services, to
analyse rapidly, and to dismantle, persistent barriers to the cross-border provision of services;
14. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission.C 21 E/366 EN 24.1.2002 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 5 April 2001