ARCHIVESHISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(78)75
Vol.1978/0027

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement(CEE,Euratom)n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernantl'ouvertureaupublicdesarchiveshistoriquesdelaCommunauté économique
européenneetdelaCommunautéeuropéennedel'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement(CE,Euratom)n°1700/2003du22septembre2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003,p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiésconformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
InaccordancewithCouncilRegulation(EEC,Euratom)No354/83of1February1983
concerningtheopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropeanEconomic
CommunityandtheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunity(OJL43,15.2.1983,p.1),as
amendedbyRegulation(EC,Euratom)No1700/2003of22September2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003,p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary,classifieddocumentsinthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformitywithArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung(EWG,Euratom)Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar1983überdieFreigabederhistorischen ArchivederEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung(EG,Euratom)Nr.1700/2003vom22.September2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003,S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeitzugänglich.Soweit
erforderlich,wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenanntenVerordnungfreigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROFEANCOMMUNITIES
COM(78)75final.
Brussels,3March1978
REPORTONRELATIONSWITHNON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS(NGOs)
ACTIVEINTHEFIELDOPDEVELOPMENT,WITHSPECIALREFERENCE
TOTHECOFINANCING OPPROJECTS(1977)
(CommunicationfromtheCommissiontotheCouncil)
COK(78)75final.

CONTENTS
Pa:?e
I.INTRODUCTION 1
II.COFINANCING OFNGOPROJECTSINTHEDEVELOPING
COUNTRIES 2
1.Generalconditionsforcofinancing contracts
2.Cofinancing withNGOsunderthe1977budget
3.Administration of1976cofinancingoperations
III.DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONINTHECOMMUNITY 6
IV.COORDINATION OFRELATIONS WITHTHENGOsANDTHE
FUNCTIONING OFTHENGOLIAISONCOMMITTEE 7
V.CONCLUSION 8
ANNEX I
Summaryreportonthemeetingsfortheexchangeofinformation between
Commissionstaffand(i)therepresentatives ofMemberStateGovernments
responsibleforrelationswithNGOsindevelopmentmatters;(ii)the
aboveandrepresentatives oftheNGOs.
TABLEI:BreakdownbyMemberStateofNGOprojectscofinanced
in1977.
TABLEII
TABLEIII
TABLEIV:NGOprojectscofinancedin1977•
:BreakdownbyrecipientcountryofNGOprojectscof:
in1977-
:Classification ofNGOprojectscofinancedm1977*
TABLEV:BreakdownbyNGOofprojectscofinancedin1977

REPORT ONRELATIONS WITH NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
(NGOs )ACTIVE INTHEFIELD OPDEVELOPMENT ,WITH SPECIAL
REFERENCE TOTHE COFINANCING OFPROJECTS
Commission Communication "tothe Council
I.Introduction
1.This Communication deals chiefly with theusemade oftheappropriation
of4million u.a.entered tinder item 945of "the1977Community budget ^".
Itisbeing presented persuant totheprocedure forutilization ofthe
appropriation ,which theCouncil (Development )approved atitsmeeting
2on28November 1977 •
2.Italso deals with other important aspects oftheCommunity 'scooperation
with theNGOs ,notably theadministration ofcofinancing contracts
concluded in1976 ,"theprospects forcooperation ineducating European
public opinion indevelopment matters andthecoordination ofNGO-
Community relations .
3.Lastly ,theCommission would like todraw attention totheinteresting
conclusions reached atthe second meeting between theMember States *
departments responsible forrelations with the NGOs and theCommission
departments ,held on22November 1977 *Th®purpose ofthemeeting was
tocontinue theuseful exchange ofviews that hadstarted in1976 on '
anumber ofquestions connected with cooperation with the NGOs .
This meeting was followed forthe first time byatripartite meeting
between representatives oftheGovernments ,theNGOs andtheCommission
departments .
Annex Icontains abrief report onthese meetings .
Asimilar report waspresented forthe1976 financial year :seeCommission
communication COM (77)83final of18March 1977 *
SeeCouncil document T/997/77(GCD)of6December 1977 *

-2-
II.Cofinancing ofNGOprojectsmthedevelopingcountries
1.Generalconditionsforcofinancing contracts
Onthebasisofthegeneralcriteriaandrulesfortheutilization of
Communityappropriations forNGOdevelopment schemes-approvedby
theCouncil(Development)atitsmeetingon28November1977^"-
GeneralConditionsforcofinancingcontractswerelaiddown,and
1976and1977cofinancing schemesweracarriedoutinaccordance
withthem.
TheGeneralConditionsenabledNGOsofverydifferenttendenciesand
sizes-fromallnineMemberStatesoftheCommunity-tocofinance
withtheCommunitygoodprojectsinalargenumberofdeveloping
countriesinallpartsoftheworld.
TheConditionshavethereforeprovedsatisfactory intheinitialstages,
,takingintoaccountimprovements madeinthemeantimetotwoimportant
points:
.i)theCommunitycontribution hasbeenraisedfrom50i°"to75ofthe
totalcostofprojectsinvolvingexceptional circumstances ;
ii)asfrom1978itwillbepossibletocofinanceprojectsthattake
severalyearstocompletesincenon-differentiated appropriations
havebeenearmarkedforthatpurposeinthe1978budget.
Therecouldnevertheless beoneproblemin1978whenthetransitionis
madefromtheu.a.totheEUAastheaccountingunit,particularly as
regardstheupperlimitperprojectperyear,whichhassofarbeen
fixedat100000u.a.;asimpletranscription toread100000EUAcould
penalizeinparticular NGOsfromcertainMemberStatesthatarein
the"snake".Thismatterwillthereforeneedtobereconsidered .
SeeAnnexVtoT/997/77(GCD)of6December1977.

-3-
2.Cofinancing with NGOs tinder the 1977 "budget
2.1 Présent situation
Themain area where cooperation with NGOs hasbeen stepped upis
thecofinancing ofoperational projects inthedeveloping countries
carried outontheinitiative andresponsibility ofNGOs from the
Member States oftheCommunity .
Theappropriation earmarked forthis purpose bythebudget authority
inthe1977 Community budget (4million u.a.)wasupbynearly 60%
onthe1976 budget appropriation (2.5million u.a.)butwasstill
below thelevel theCommission had first proposed back in1975
(5million u.a.).
TheNGOs took very great advantage ofthenew scope forcofinancing
offered tothem in1977 *They submitted 206projects involving a
total cofinancing reouirement of7million u.a.,which was farmore
than the amount available .
Outofthe139projects registered ,113projects presented by43
NGOs from thenine Member States were approved foratotal of
4million u.a.,thusabsorbing thetotal appropriation .^
Ofthe113projects approved ,88hadbeen paid forinwhole orin
part (total cost :1882422u.a.)bytheendof1977 *Thepayment
procedures will carry onnormally during 1978 .
Since therequests forfinancing farexceeded theamount available ,
anumber ofprojects have been carried over to1978 .
Lastly ,itshould benoted that among the67projects notregistered
there were some that were notadmissible since they didnotmeet
thecofinancing criteria ,some that were withdrawn bytheNGOand
others that were incomplete and inabeyance .
The139registered projects break down asfollows :
113projects approved
2withdrawn bytheNGO
24carried over to1978

-4-
2.2Analysisoftheprojects
Adetailed analysis oftheprojects approved forfinancing from 1977
appropriations istobefound inthetables attached tothis Communication .
The tables call for thefollowing remarks :
Ofthe43NGOs presenting projects ,18were doing soforthefirst time .
This isasatisfactory development andproves that thecofinancing
system isopen toallqualified NGOs ,thebasis criterion remaining
thequality oftheproject .
Itshould benoted here that local authorities orinternational NGOs
areincreasingly tending topresent projects tothe Commission directly .
This procedure cannot beencouraged because atpresent European NGOs
areanswerable totheCommunity fortheprojects that arecofinanced ,
andindeed they cover asarule 50 ofthe cost oftheprojects .
The content oftheprojects continues tobevery varied andthe
financial backing requested -between 1,300 u.a .and100,000 u.a .
perproject -isintended foroperations ranging from thepurchase
ofsmall items ofequipment torural development forming part of
integrated projects comprising production ,training ,social
infrastructure and equipment .Thediversity oftheprojects isa
faithful reflection ofthe diversity oflocal requirements and confirms
thecomplementary nature oftheNG0 schemes .
Thebalance among recipient countries hasbeen maintained .They are
situated inallparts ofthedeveloping world with Africa predominating .
Among the44countries concerned bytheprojects ,there are 14new
ones compared with 1976 .Thebeneficiaries aremostly disadvantaged
rural communities and moxe rarely theneglected urban areas within
andaround large towns .The people concerned actively participate in
designing ,implementing andadministering theprojects .
Lastly ,itshould benoted that theCommunity contribution exceeded
50$ofthetotal cost oftheprojects inonly sixcases forwhich
there wasproper justification ..

2.3Involvementoftheauthoritiesoftherecipientcountries
ItshouldberememberedthatbeforeaEuropean NGOcanpresenta
projectforcofinancingitmustfirstobtaintheapprovalofthe
relevantauthorityonthespot.
Furthermore ,theCommissionintends,asitdidlastyear,totransmit
acopyofthisreportforinformation purposestothemissionsof
therecipientcountriesinBrusselsandalsototheACPSecretariat .
ItshouldalsobementionedthatduringcontactswithNGOrepresenta­
tivesonthespotorwiththeCommunityauthorities ,anumberof
GovernmentsexplicitlyconfirmedthattheywereinterestedinNGO
operationintheircountries.
2.4Executionandmonitoringofprojectscofinancedfrom1977budget
appropriations
TheCommunitystartedpayingcontributions formostofthe1977
projectsonlyinthesecondhalfoftheyearandpaymentswillgo
oninto1978.NGOsarerequiredtosubmittheirimplementation
reports,dealinginparticularwiththeaccounts,sixmonthsafter
thelastpayment.Themonitoringof1977projectswillthereforebe
abletobeginin197&*
Administration of1976cofinancinff
Theadministration ofNGOprojectscofinancedfrom197"budgetappro­
priationscontinuedthroughout 1977•
Paymentsforalloperationsweremadewithinthetimelimitssetby
thecofinancingcontractsconcludedwiththeNGOs.
ThismeansthatwhereCommunitycontributions exceeded30000u.a.and
werepayableinseveralinstalments theNGOswereabletosubmit
satisfactory interimreportsingoodtime.
Significantdelaysintheworksschedulehaveoccurredinonlytwoof
the76projectscofinancedin1976.

-6-
Astart hasbeen made onthe examination ofthe implementation reports
submitted bytheNGOs forprojects cofinanced from 1976budget
appropriations .
Since thelast payments were notmade until theendof1977 ?however ,
there arestill anumber ofreports tocome .Besides _fcertain NGO
reports have been delayed ,and itwould seem that theperiod ofsix
months which theNGOs have tocarry outtheprojects andpresent the
reports inquestion istoo short inmany cases and should bere­
considered .
The examination oftheimplementation reports will therefore continue
in1978 anditistooearly toform anoverall opinion ofthem atpresent .
III .Development education inthe Community
The NGOs involved ineducating public opinion indevelopment matters are
pressing forCommunity assistance inthis area .Some ofthem are ,moreover ,
already collaborating with theCommission departments inthefield of
information .
The Commission organized a"ways andmeans "seminar with theNGOs concerned
attheir request inJune 1977 *Theaimwastoexamine thegrounds *"01*
NGO-Community cooperation ineducating public opinion intheCommunity and
theways inwhich such cooperation could take place .This first NGO
seminar ondevelopment education confirmed that interest isbeing shown
inNGO-Community cooperation inthat field .
Unlike other sectors ofCommunity interest (social ,agricultural etc.)
\ there isnoreally Community size NGOtopromote development education .
Itisintheinterests ofboth theCommunity and theNGOs concerned with
development ,therefore ,togive each other mutual support inencouraging
inpublic opinion anawareness ofandaresponsible attitude towards the
development ofrelations between thedeveloping countries andtheindustri­
alized countries ingeneral andtheCommunity inparticular .
Tothis end ,precise guidelines forcooperation emerged from theseminar ,
thetopics tobedealt with ,thetypes ofaudience tobereached (target
groups )andtheways andmeans ofachieving that aimwithout having
necessarily tocall upon additional financial resources .

Also ,general criteria could beworked out ,onthebasis oftheguidelines
adopted ,forcofinancing operations paid foroutofNGOappropriations to
bestarted upprobably during 1978 ,which would bedesigned toeducate
public opinion andwould bring theEuropean dimension into matters concerning
relations with the developing countries .
XV.Coordination ofrelations with the NGOs and the functioning ofthe
NGO Liaison Committee
1.TheCommission organized theannual meeting oftheNGOAssembly in
January 1977 •About fifty NGOrepresentatives were invited tothis
Assembly onthebasis oftheir personal experience todiscuss in
particular thefirst impressions ofcofinancing cooperation in1976 and
theprospects invarious fields (cofinancing ,development education ,
voluntary workers ,food aid).
The results ofthe discussions were circulated toall the NGOs inthe
Member States .
2.TheAssembly also held elections torenew theNGOLiaison Committee ,
which hadbeen setupbytheorganizations in1976 .TheCommittee
consists ofnine NGO representatives –oneperMember State –and is
responsible forfacilitating contacts with the Commission andamong
the NGOs themselves .
During 1977 "theCommittee met five times inBrussels ,both with the
Commission and onitsown .Ithas accomplished aconsiderable amount
ofcoordination benefiting both theNGOs concerned andtheCommunity .
TheCommission hasalready raised thequestion ofcovering thecosts
arising fromthesecretarial andcoordination workoftheCommittee .^-
Nowthat thebudget authority hastaken adecision onthematter ,
these costs canbepartially subsidized asfrom 1978 *
Commission communication totheCouncil ,COM (77)83final of18March 1977 »
Chapter IV,2.

-8-
V.Concluaion
The Community 'scooperation with the NGOs inthe field ofdevelopment ,
which started in1976 ,wasconsolidated considerably onvarious planes
during 1977 •
1.The size and range ofNGO requests forthe cofinancing ofoperational
projects onthe spot reflect theneeds that exist inthedevloping
countries .The Community was able tosatisfy only some ofthese needs .
Theincreased appropriation for1978 should enable amore generous
response tothese needs tobemade infuture within theframework of
theflexible application ofprocedures ,general criteria andmethods
ofutilizing thefunds ,towhich theCouncil (Development )agreed at
itsmeeting of22November 1977 *Nevertheless theannual ceiling for
the Community contribution will have tobereviewed asmentioned earlier .
Asin1976 ,onebiggapintheCommunity 'scofinancing system wasthat
itwasnotpossible toenter into any commitment formultiannual projects .
Following thebudget authority 'sdecision toprovide separate amounts ,
this drawback canbeeliminated in1978 -
Theredoes not seem atpresent tobeanymajor problem connected with
thefurther management ofthe1976a-nd1977 appropriations ,added to
which will bethenew1978 appropriation ,except that itdoes notlook as
though itwill bepossible forthe small number ofCommission staff to
cope with thegreatly increased volume ofwork .
2.There arenewpractical opportunities fortheeducation ofpublic opinion
inthe .Community .Asitwill bepossible infuture toconsider cofinancing
NGOeducation projects ,theCommission will bepreparing specific
criteria incollaboration with therelevant Community bodies andthe
NGOs .
3.Uptonow ,thecoordination ofNGO relations hasbeen onatrial and
error basis .Now that the secretarial and coordination work ofthe NGO
Liaison Committee istoreceive financial backing ,these tasks canbe
carried out infuture inafairer manner .

Given this consolidated base ,cooperation with non-governmental
circles aspart oftheCommunity 'sdevelopment policy islikely
totake onanewdimension andbranch outinto other spheres ,notably
that offood aid .

ANNÎÎXI
Summaryreporton"themeetingsfortheexchangeof
information betweenCommissionstaffand:
i)therepresentatives ofMemberStateGovernments
responsibleforrelationswithNGOsindevlopment
matters;
ii)theaboveandrepresentatives oftheNGOs
Brussels.22November1977
ThesecondmeetingbetweentheGovernmentrepresentatives responsiblefor
relationswiththeNGOsandCommissionstaffwasorganizedinresponseto
themutuallyexpresseddesiretocontinuetheusefulexchangesofinformation
-startedinNovember1976^-ontheirrespectiveideasandexperiencein
thefieldofdevelopment cooperation withtheNGOs.
Thismeetingwasfollowedforthefirsttimebyatripartitie meetingof
Governmentrepresentatives ,NGOrepresentatives ontheNGOLiaisonCommittee
andCommissionstaff.
Discussionatthetwomeetingscentredessentially onthecofinancing of
NGOprojectsindevelopingcountries,educatingpublicopinioninEurope
tobeawareofdevelopment problemsandonvoluntaryworkers.
Themainpointswereasfollows:
I.Cofinancin ,?ofNGOpro.jectsindevelopingoountries
1.EightMemberStatesandtheCommunityassuchhavenowestablished
asystemofcofinancing withtheNGOs:GermanyandtheNetherlands
havehadsucha^rstemforovertenyears.Italyforfiveyearsnow,
Belgium,theUnitedKingdomandtheCommunityfortwoyears,Prance
foroneyearandIrelandsincesixmonths.
Seereportofthefirstmeeting:AnnexItotheCommission Communication
totheCouncil-COM(77)83finalof18March1977

Besides these ,theLuxembourg Government occasionally subsidizes NGO
projects .
Consequently regular exchanges ofinformation areessential inorder
toprofit from theexperience gained andtoavoid duplication ofeffort .
2.Coordinating andinformation links with theNGOs areorganized to
different degrees bythepublic authorities atnational level inGermany ,
Belgium ,Prance andtheNetherlands ,andalso atCommunity level .It
should bestressed that ,intheNetherlands ,the cofinancing system is
organized essentially viafour intermediary NGOs andmost projects
cofinanced bytheGovernment gothrough these intermediary NGOs .In
Germany there isasystem ofintermediaries forsome NGOs and such a
system isbeing setupinBelgium too .
Onthe NGO side aninformation chain has been established via the inter­
national NGOs ,within which abroad cross-section ofCommunity NGOs is
represented (e.g. CIDSE ,EURO ACTION-AC ORD).
Ofcourse ,these information and coordination processes donotaffect
thediversity ortheindependanceof theNGOs .
3.Itisfelt that although harmonization ofthedifferent systems of
cofinancing isdesirable per se,itwould notberealistic atthepresent
stage totrytoundertake such harmonization atCommunity level .The
basic criteria ofthedifferent systems arebroadly comparable ,but
inpractice their application andrelevant experience differ inmany ways >
Thesystem will ,therefore ,bealigned gradually through exchanges of
information andanyensuing practical adaptations .
4.Anexamination ofthepossibility oftriangular cofinancing ,involving
NGOs ,Member States andtheEEC ,ledmost oftheGovernment representatives
toconclude that such cofinancing isworthwhile forlarge-scale projects ,
because oftherestrictions imposed bytheCommunity 'srules (limit of
50$ofthecost oftheproject ,ceiling of100000u.a .perproject per
annum ).The .-German Government ,however ,hasnotyettaken astance on
this question .

-3-
5.The NGOs' particular concern regarding cofinanced projects arethe
operating costs ,maintenance costs andpayforthestaff working on
the spot .TheNGOs consider that the local population does notgenerally
have suitable structures tooperate the larger projects and that those
structures and connected expenses should form part ofthose projects ,
foraprolonged period ifnecessary .
Certain Government representatives have expressed reservations about
this ,fortheprojects .should beself-supporting after aninitial launching
period ;besides ,ifthese costs were tobeborne systematically this
would place anincreasing burden onthecofinancing budgets asthe
years went by,tothe detriment ofpossible financing 6fnewprojects .
Nevertheless ,thequestion should bediscussed further .
II.Educating :European public opinion about development matters
1.Asystem ofcofinancing development education projects -aimed atusing
...more .than the traditional information media toarouse public opinion –
exists infive Member States (Germany ,Denmark ,Italy ,Netherlands and
United Kingdom ).InBelgium thesystem isattheexperimental stage .
There arealso occasional cofinancings forthis purpose inPrance ,
Ireland and Luxembourg .
Abrief exchange ofviews washeld onthedifferent systems inuse .
Attention was drawn totwo fundamental aspects :
i)There islittle coordination among NGOs onthis question ;itis
desirable ,therefore ,that theGovernments draw upprogrammes in
concert with them and try toavoid problems being raised intoospecific
amanner byminority groups .
Tothis end ,development education projects inDenmark ,theNetherlands
and theUnited Kingdom arechosen via joint Government-NGO advisory
committees ,with which labour andbusiness areassociated ;in
Germany anannual overall programme isprepared jointly bythe
Government andtheNGOs ;

-4-
ii)Some development education projects tend tobeprotracted ,
involving high staff andmanagement costs ;thesituation should be
avoided where such projects become virtually permanent burden on
thebudget tothedetriment ofnewprojects .
2.TheCommunity isthinking oflaunching cofinancings ofthis nature as
from 1978 .TheGovernment andNGOrepresentatives think this isboth
possible anddesirable .Thefollowing nrust ,however ,betaken into
account :
i)TheGovernment representatives oftheMember States that have joint
Government-NGO advisory committees consider that these committees
should bekept informed oftheNGOprojects the Community intends
tocofinance intheir territory ;
ii)NGOdevelopment education projects cofinanced bytheCommunity should
inject aEuropean dimension into questions concerning relations with
thedevloping countries .
The NGOrepresentatives mentioned ,asanexample ,thepossibility of
awakening public opinion tothe renegotiation ofthe Lome Convention
between the ACP and the EEC .
Onthewhole these considerations confirmed theconclusions ofthe "ways
andmeans "seminar ondevelopment education arranged bytheCommission in
June 1977 with the NGOs concerned .
III .Volunteers
1.There arelaws governing volunteers inGermany ,Belgium ,Denmark ,Prance
andItaly .There isalso asystem ofsubsidies forvolunteers inIreland ,
theNetherlands and theUnited Kingdom .
Inview ofthedifferences between these systems andtheaspects of
national policy attached tothem (recruitment ,expatriation ,social
security ,personal safety ,contractual commitments ),theGovernment
representatives feel that itisnotdesirable atpresent toharmonize
these systems atCommunity level .

-5-
2.Uptonow,theCommunityhasmadenocontribution totheexpenses
connectedwithvolunteersunlesstheyarelinkeddirectlywiththe
NGOs'operationalprojectsinthefield.
ThesuggestionhasbeenmadethattheCommunitycouldlookintothe
possibility ofsettingupacomplementary Europeanvolunteerservice,
comparabletotheUNsystem:qualifiedEuropeans,paidbytheCommunity,
wouldbeplacedtemporarilyatthedisposaloftheNGOs-oreven
otherbodies-attheirrequest,tocarryouttasksinthedevioping
countires.Itisfelt,however,thataccountshouldbetakenofthe
ongoingdebateonthereformofthevolunteerserviceingeneraland
alsoofthechangingpatternofsupplyanddemandinthisfield.It
-isfoundthatcertainvolunteers fromindustrialized countriesare
notsuitablyqualifiedforworkindevelopingocuntriesj ontheother
.hand,therearemanyqualifiednationalsofdevelopingcountrieswho
arewaitingforajob,ifnecessaryinanothercountry.
CONCLUSION
Thesecondmeetingwiththerepresentatives oftheGovernments ofthe
MemberStatesandthefirsttripartitemeetingbetweentherepresentatives
ofGovernments ,NGOsandtheCommission seemtohavesatisfiedtheneed
forexchangeofinformation ondevlopmentcooperation withtheNGOs.
TheCommissionwillarrangesimilarmeetingsatregularintervalstokeep
upthisusefulexchange.
Amoredetailedworkingpaperonallthequestionsreferredtoisbeing
preparedincollaboration withtheGovernmentrepresentatives .

TABLE I SUMMARY OPPROJECTS BYMEMBER STATE
MEMBER STATE Number of
NGOsProjects registered (i) Projects notadopted .(2]Projects approved
Number Contributions
requested inu.a .Number Contributions
requested inu.a .Number
ofNGOsNumber I
Projectbf Community
s commitment
I
BELGIUM 7 15 597.546,25 ,
(29.877.309 FB)4 227.601,26
(11.380.063 PB)7I
11 369.944,92
(18.497.246 F3)
DENMARK 3 5 65.113,67
(488.353 DKr)1 2.511
(18.833 .DKr)2 4 62.602.67
(469.520 Mr)
FEDERAL REPUBLIC
OFGERMANY9 17 1.013.351,64
(3.708.867 DM)1 8.196,72
(30.000 ,-DM)8 16 1.005.154,92
(3.678.867 ,-DM)
FRANCE 8 17 808.136,02
(4.488.541 FF)3 121.799,94
(676.5OO ,-FF)7 14 686.336,08
(3.812.041 FF)
IRELAND 3 18 190.616,70
(£79.423.83 )3 18 190.616,70
(£79.423.83 )
ITALY 5 17754.847
(467.279.375 Lit)3 161.949
(t01.l2l.l25 Lit)5 14 585.698
(366.061.250 lit)
LUXEMBOURG 1 1 30.000
(1.500.000 FLux )1
V1 30.000
(1.500.000 Flux )
NETHERLANDS '3 11 446.452
(1.616.155 Fl)1 9&«802
(357.662 Fl)3 ' 10 347.650
.(1.258.493 FO
[UNITED KINGDOM 7 38 963.630,62
(£.401.512,76 )13 241.634.40
(£100.681 )7
______25 v721.996,22
(£300.831,76 )
OVL 46 139 4.862.494 26 862.494 43I113 I4.000.000 m.a.|
1)Including 8projects originally registered in1976 andcarried over to1977
')Including 2projects subsecruently withdrawn bytheNGOand24projects carried over to1978

TABLEII
SummaryofProjectsapprovedduringtheBudgetyear±977«

Project no. %NCO Brief description oftho projectType of
projcctContri.but LOO .
corail ittod (u.a .)
jKG/41/76/77/lRl-
JONCERN
YSupply ofanengine forariver boat
inorder tofacilitate access tothe
market atKalabo forvillage producers
ZAMBIA
Total coat :£5.428 ,30Economic 6.513,90
£ 2.714,15
ONG/42/76/77/IRL
CONCERNEstablishment ofpoultry cooperative .
Instructing trainees inbreeding tech­
niques ,Livingstone .ZAMBIA
Total co3t :£1.107,36Economic 1.328,80
£ 553,68
ONG/62/76/77/IT
L.V.I.A.Construction ofarural training cen­
treincluding rural advisory services ,
acooperative and fa-nily education ,
Ituracsa ,BURUNDI .
Total cost :Lit .93.674.000Rural 74.320
Lit46.450.000
ONG/64/76/77/IT
Carried over to1978 .
ONG/65/76/77/IT
L.V.I.A.Rural advisory services ,promotion of
improvenents insocial hygiene ,im­
provement ofhousing and craft educat­
ion ,Hendida ,ETHIOPIA
Total cost :Lit .112.000.000Rural89.600
Lit .56.000.000
ONG/83/75/77/lT
GRUPPO ABELEConstruction ofachildren *shome and
ofavocational training centre near
HoChiMinh City ,VIETNAM .
Total cost :Lit .724.000.500Social 100.000
Lit .62.500.000
ONG/88/76/77/D
KATHOLISCHE ZENTRAL­
STELLE FÜRENTWICK­
LUNGSHILFEPurchase ofabuilding for the vocatio­
nal training ofpersons involved inth«
running ofcooperatives ,and for the
administration ofthegroup ofcoope­
ratives ,Bangkok ,THAILAND .
Total cost :DM282.000 ,-Sconomic 38.524,5 ?
"DM 141.000 ,–
ONG/94/76/77/D
DEUTSCHE VJELTHUNGER -
HILFEMechanization ofsmall farming coope­
ratives inthe Daule –Balzar-Vinces
area .ECUADOR .
Total cost :DM802.000 ,–Economic 100.000
DM 366.000
ONG/l/77/lRL
G0RTAIrrigation atAswara .NIGERIA
Total cost j£5.58OEconomic 2.472
£ 1.030
ONG/2/77/IRL
G0RTAVegetable growing ,Galapo ,TANZANIA .
Total cost :£1.750Economic 1.680
£ 700
0NG/3/77/IRL .
C0NCERHConstruction of25subsidized houses
atShillong .INDIA .
Total cost :£9«437Social 11.323,2 .
£ 4.718

2.
a;>.ii;'JO-|
|Brief doscripticn aft'.:nprojaetType of
projectCor.tr
co-.->:'1l/VV1'..'1
.t-.oi ')
ONG/4/77/IKL
CONCERNRepair oftheroad atShillong .INDIA
;Total cost :£2.311|Economic
1
!,£2.311,18
963
ONG/5/77/UX
AMRF•Purchase ofequipment fortheFlying
iDoctor Service .TANZANIA .
;Total cost :£129.8361 !
jSocial
11
£100.000
41.667
.ONC/6/77/UK
OXFAMIEstablishment ofahospital at
;Maejarin ,THAILAND . j
.Total cost :£46.896 )
_J ; : ISocial
£
I56.274,76
23.448
ONG/7/77/P
C.C.F.D.!Reissue ofbooklet onfirst year of
agricultural training forINADES .
|IVORY COAST
Total cost :FF389.928Social
I
1
iFF
i34.952,71 *
194.134
ONO/8/77/NL Technical assistance forana/rricultur -
CE3EK0 alcollege atMakale .INDONESIA .
Total cost :fl.II7.285jSocial | 15.294,20
jfl.55-365
i
I
■ONG/9/77/NL Construction ofasocial centre at
CEBEtfO 'Kanado ,INDONESIA
[Total cost :fl.148.979
L ;Social1
1 20.511,05
fl.74.250
ONG/10/77/D "Improvement ofpasture bysoil–treat-
BROT PyRDIEWELT rncnt ,sowing cereals andvegetables
'suited totheSahelian climate ,UPPER VO
'Total cost :DM500.250
iEconomic
,TA.<
j 61.738,25
i DM225.962
I
ONG/ll/77/F |Contribut iontoatraining course for
C.C.F.D. 1instructor /motivators andhealth visi-
'tors .Region ofMechraf ,LEBANON ,
jTotal cost :FF288.000
! ■pooial 16.203,98
j |FF90.000
!
ONG/12/77/DX
Mellemfolkeligt ;Withdrawn byNGO
Saaienvirke _ 1i :
I
I
I
t
CIMADE^77^ 'Withdrawn byNGO .I
I
I
ONG/I4/77/F .Raising thequality andquantity of
CIKADE ;cattle herds byprovision ofspecially
bred cattle ,creation ofsupervisory
;service .Podor .SENEGAL
.Total cost sFF300.000
t 8Economie • j 27.006,64
ÌFF 150.000
I
|
\
ONG/15/77/DK 'Purchase andinstallation ofradio equip
Afrikanse Laegefond ;ment forthemobile medical service , '
Lamu district ,KENYA
!Tptal cost :DKr .535.627
.i
i
» •j
Social
<
9I ■
23.254,40
Ken 174.408

Projectno.iNGOjBriofdescriptionoftheprojectTypeof
ProjectContribut i-jn
cor.wi.tted (u.a.)
O:IG/I6/77/D
Zentralstelle für
EntwicklungshilfeI
|Improvementofhospitalequipment^no­
tablys•
–installation ofmedicalequipment }
-buildingaccomodation forstaff}
-purchaseofequipment
Aligarh,INDIA.
Totalcost:DM222.000Social 16.771,31
.DM61.383
'ONG/17/77/B
LesamisdeGatagara
IContribution totheconstruction of
jhousingestates-accomodationforhan­dicappedworkers,Cikondo,RWANDA.
,TotalcostjBfr.5*008.000Social 68.000
Bfr.3.400.000
ONC/18/77/UX
SavetheChildren
FundI
Provisionofmedicalandeducational
serviceforchildreninKatmandu,NEPAL.
jTotalcostt£2^.000 ■■Social 30.000
£12.500
ONG/19/77/IT
ComunitàLaici
Missionari Cattolioi
iI
Construction ofavocationaltraining
centreforthefarmersofthesouth-
easternregionoftheIVORYCOAST.Totalcost:Lit.129.024.360
iSocial 100.000
Lit.62.500.000
0NG/20/77/IT
ManiTeseRuraldevelopmentprojectinvolvingim­
provementofirrigationandcrops,at
Kutupur,BANGLADESH .
jTotalcosttLit.22.058.000
t 1 !RuralI
17.600
Lit.11.000.000
ONG/21/77/IT
ManiTesePurchaseandinstallation ofpumpsin
variousregionsinUPPER-VOLTA .
Totalcost:Lit.39*980.000
'Economic 31.984
Lit.19.990.000
0UG/22/77/IT
ManiTeseConstruction oftrainingcentreforcar­
pentersatSesheke,ZAMBIA.
Totalcost:Lit.39.038.800Social 27.475,20
Lit.17.172.000
ONG/23/77/IT I
ManiTese !Agricultural trainingatKoindu,SIERRA
!LEONE
Totalcost:Lit.7*040.000Social 5.632
Lit.3.520.000
ONG/24/77/IRL
CONCERNRuraldevelopment projectincludingir­
rigation,roadbuilding,etc.at
jGumanmardan,BANGLADESH.
Totalcost:£45-502Rural 46.727,62
£19.470
OÎÎG/25/77/B
ENTfi'AIDEetFRATER­
NITEContributiontoconstruction andequip­
mentofahealthcentreafcKitabi,
RWANDA
Totalcost:Bfr.1.958.000Social 19.580
Bfr.979.000
.
I
i
I
I

■4.
Project no. tÎ.'GOI
jBrief description oftheproject .Typo of
ProjectContribut .xi
co.aTnttci (u.a.)
ONG/26/77/lHL
G0RTAAgricultural training atSt.Joseph 's
Boys' Village atPeriyakulum ,INDIA .
Total cost :£2.330Social
£2.796
1.165
ONG/27/77/iRL
G0RTAIrrigation system formarshland inthe
Boregion ,SIERRA LEONE .
Total cost t£5.100Economic
£3.840
1.600
0NG/28/77/IRL
G0RTASupply ofpalm-tree seeds toDamtala -
Kandu ,SIERRA LSONE .
Total cost 1£I.56OEconomic
£1.872
780
0:10/29/77/1RL I
GORTA jImprovement ofcatt le-farming atSan
Pedro deValdiva ,ECUADOR .
Total cost :£16.530Economic
I£12.000
5.000
ONG/^O/77/lRL
C0NC2RNI –
Construction ofaroad atMohanganj ,
BANGLADESH
jTotalcost ;£49.568,50Economic
!£60.000
25.000
ONG/31/77/UK
CAP0DConstruction ofarural training centre
atAmadi ,SUDAN
Total cost >£107.457Social
£8.759,94
3.650
ONG/32/77/UK
Save the Children
IPurchase ofequipment forarural medi­
cal post atJumla ,NEPAL .
Total cost t£92.750Social
j£28.200
11.750
ONG/33/77/NL
NOVIBIrrigation atTanga ,TANZANIA .
Total cost :fi.138 .416Economic
'fl.19.118,24
69.208
ONG/34/77/P
FONDATION DELTA 7[Contribution toequipment ofababy-
minding /kindergarten centre atCa;a-Pha ,
VIET NAM .
Total cost :FF140.000Social
FF10.802,66
60.000
ONG/35/77/UK
0XFAMReconct ruction ofhouses destroyed dur­
inganearthquake ,Bali ,IND0N-&SIA .
Total cost :£60.046,51Social
£72.055,22
30.023,25
ONG/36/77/P
C.I.D.R.
j
ir :
Development project fortheGofa region ,
particularly contribution toconstruc­
tion andequipment ofclassrooms for
training and tothetraining ofdirec­
tors for farmers' associations ,
ETHIOPIA .
Total cost 1FF 1.984.000Rural
FF56.470,88
313.650

–"1 –-
Projectno.iKGOjBriofdescriptionoftheprojectTypeof I
projoct jContribution
co.amitted(u.a.)
DKG/37/77A'
3.C.F.D.Contribution totheequipmentof3bore
holeswithsolarpumpsoperatingon
photovoltaic cells,MALI.
Totalcost:FF520.260Economic 57.660,97
FF320.260
ONG/38/77/B
1.3.0.Development of2villagesintheKef
region,particularly contribution to
constructionofaccoianodat ionand
agricultural reformintheregion,
TUNISIA.
TotalcostsBfr.5«550.000Rural 32.000
FF1.600.000
DNG/^9/77/irl
30RTAIAgriculturaltraining,purchaseof
jequiornont ,etc.intheYengema,region,
ISIERRALEONE.
Totalcost:£5*245Social 3.792
£1.580
ONC/40/77/IRL
CORTAIrrigat'ion andsoilimprovernentat
Palane,SRILANKA.
Totalcost:£10.705Economic
512.000
£5.000
0KG/41/77/IRI'
CORTAPurchaseofamotorforamaizesix11at
Kaijado,KENYA.
Totalcost:£2.000Economio 2.220 .
£925
DHG/42/77/IKI' i
CORTA. jIrrigationatKitale,KENYA..
Totalcost:£7.000.Economic 8.400
£3.500
!
ONG/43/77/lRL
CORTAAidindevelopment ofpoultryproduc­
tionatItenandRnali,KENYA.
|Totalcost:£.2.600
!Economic 1.440
£600
DNC/44/77/UK
OXFAMSowingolive-treeseedsintheMafrak
district,JORDAN
Totalcost:£14.578Economic •5.635,16
£2.348
ONG/45/77/UK
QXFAMAcquisition andestablishment ofa
mobileophtalmologicalunit,GUATEMALA
Totalcost:£8.664,24Social 10.396,8
£4.332
0NG/4S/77/3
SNTR'AIDEetFRATER­
NITEConstruction andequipmentofaschool
forchildren'snurses,PortLouis,
MAURITIUS .
Totalcost:BF1.620.000.SocialI16.200
£810.000
DMG/47/77/NL
I0VIBConstruction andequipmentofawork­
shopforthetrainingofblacksmiths
at'I-ledan,INDONESIA.
-Totalcost:fl.96.000Social 11.524,3fl.47.718

j
Projectno.fcKCO|BriefdescriptionoftheprojectTypoof
projectContribution
cor.rnitted(u.a.)
ONG/48/77/NL
NOVIBImprovement ofcattle-farming conditions
atPekanbaru,INDONESIA.
Totalcost:fl.105.960Economic 14.585,64
fl.52.800
ONG/49/77/D
DEUTSCHE WELTHUNGER-
HILFEConstruction ofschoolbuildings,.
Madras,INDIA.
Totalcost:DM446.535.Social 59-846,18
DM219.037
0NG/50/77/D
DEUTSCHE WELTIIUNGER-
HILFESupplyofworkshoDequipmentforappren
ticemechanics,Deorukh,Maharastra
State,INDIA.TotalcostjDM48O.97I.Social 65.706,28
DM240.485
ONG/51/77/D
ROTARYCLUBof
CERMANYIContribution toconstruction of,and
'equipmentfor,aresearchlaboratory
intheAlbert-Schweitzer Hospital,
GABON.
TotalcostDM300.000Social 40.983,61
DM150.000
ONG/52/77/lT
ManiTeseSupplyofequipmentfortrtechnical
schoolinPortoVelho,BRAZIL
Totalcost:Lit.7.630.000Social 5.440
Lit.3.400.000
ONG/53/77/D:< I
ABBEPIERRE'S
B^RNHJAELP'sinkingof100wellsinthevillages
|aroundthetownofManamadurai ,INDIA.
|Totalcost:DICr.244.020.
.■Economio 24.402
DKr.183.015 ■
ONG/54/77/DX
AB3EPIERRE'S
B0RNHJAELPSupplyingandinstallingakitchenand
amechanical cowattheMercyHospital,
Madras,INDIA.
TotalcostiDKr.112.011.Social 12.201,07
DKr.91.508
ONG/55/77/DK
ABBEPIERRE'S
B0RNHJAELPSupplyingandinstalling 3mechanical
cowsforvariousinstitutions inMadras,
INDIA.
TotalcosttDKr.27-452.Social 2.745,2
DKr.20.589
ONG/56/77/F
FONDATION DELTA7Purchaseofaudioequipmentfordeaf
children,Hanoi,VIErNAM
Totalcost:FF376.000Social 31.507,75
FF175.000 ...
ONG/57/77/F
■C.ï«D(R#Contribution tothetrainingprogramme
ofassistants andanimators,especially
bypurchasingagricultural training ,
material-Gorom-Gorom ,UPPERVOLTA.
TotalcosttFFI.O68.56OSocial
i
1
1
1
1
1 1
190.678,93
FF503.648

7.
: 1
Projectr.o.£Î.'GO jI
!Briefdescriptionoftheproject ■Typeof
ProjectContnbut ;o::
co.7L-m.tted(u.a.)
ONG/38/77A'
SecoursCatholique
■4Construction andfittingoutofawork­
shopforrepairingagricultural trac­
tors,inparticularconstruction ofa
buildingcomprisinganindoorandout­
doorworkshopfittingoutthi3workshop
andconstruction ofahostelfortrai­
neemechanics,Chikowa,ZAMBIA.
Totalcost:FF326.400.Economic 29.383,22
FF163.200
OI.'G/59/77/ttJX
ACTIONFORMATION DE
CADRES |Contribution totheinstallation of
recentlytrainedfannersbypurchasing
agricultural material,Adja-Ouere ,
BENIN.
Totalcost:KLux.2.500.000Economic1
30.000
F.Luxl.500.000
0N9/60/77/IT
ManiTese
j
\Construction andequipmentofanInte­
gratedRuraltrainingCentretopromote
agricultural expertiseamonglocal
youngpeopleinTonkoliliDistrict,
SIERRALEONE.
Totalcost:Lit.13.300.000Rural 9.600
Lit.6.000.000
:ONO/61/77/ITCarriedovertoBudgetyear1978.
ONG/62/77/B
fDELTA7BELGIQUEConstruction andequipmentof'asocio–
medicalcentre,crecheandclothes
workshopinTripoli,LEBANON.
Totalcost:PB3.470.400Social 34.704
Bfr.1.735.200
'ONG/63/77/FCarriedovertoBudgetyear1978.
ONG/64/77/B
ENTR'AIDS ETFRATER­
NITESettinguptheadministration ofthe
'Uniondesassociationsvoltaîqued'
épargneetdecrédit"in23villagesof
UPPERVOLTA
Totalcost:FBI.094.769.Economic 10.947,6
PB547.380
ONG/65/77/IT
MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO
SPACE
IIEstablishmentofacentrefortheedu-j
cationofwomenbythewomen'sUnion
forSocialActionatKyaragana-Embu ,
KENYA.
Totaloost>Lit.60.000.000
I
ISocial 48.000
Lit.30.000.000
1
1
•

'8.
Project no. 4NGO Brief description ofthe projectType of
ProjectContribution
co-^mittcd (u.a .)
ONO/65/77/inL
TR0CAIR3Establishment of-acooperative produc­
tion farm atOhingola inZAMBIA .
Total cost :t29.448Economic 9.900 .
£ 4.125
OKG/67/77/NL
CEBMOConstruction and equipment ofaschool
toteach handicapped children self-
reliance through aprogramme ofadapted
vocational teaching inPort ofSpain ,
TRINIDAD .'
Total cost :fl.242.552
• ■ ISocial 33.125,70
fl.119.915
ONG/68/77/NL .
ICCO1
iToprovide piped water including laundry
Iwashing andsanitary facilities ,
jSWAZILAND .
jTotal costtfl.5.867.434Economic 84.577,62 '
fl.306.171
ONG/63/77/UK
Institute for cul­
tural affairs
!
I
1Human development projects tohelp vil­
lagers becoine self-reliant ,self-confi -
dent and self–sustaining .Maharashtra
State ,INDIA .
Total cost :£94-235Rural 98.793,84
£ 41.164.10
ONG/70/77/lT Carried over toBudget year 1978 .
ONG/71/77/P
A.F.D.I.Education ,irrigation andhelp v;ith
production intheregion ofXantchari ,
UPPER VOIm\.
Total cosk :FF929.460Rural 83.671,97
FF 464.730
ONG/72/77/UK
CONCERN UNIVERSALBuilding and equipment ofapork factcry
atMalcoto ,'TANZANIA .
Total cost t£33.404,36Economic 33.059,61
£ 13.774,85
ONC/n/77/D
^ZENTRALSTELLE FÜR
ENTW ICKLUNGSHI LFE
4Supply ofequipment fortechnical train­
ingattheHymyong Comprehensive High
School inSuwan ,SOUTH KOREA .
Total cost :500.000 DMSocial 68.306.01
DM 250.000
ONG/74/77/D
ZENTRALSTELLE FÜR
ENTW ICKLUNGSHI LFEEquipment and fitting out ofthe machine
shop ofthe Don Bosco Youth Centre in .
Seoul ,SOUTH KOREA .
Total cost :DM1.380.000 .Social 50.000
DM 183.000
0NG/75/77/D
ZENTRALSTELLE FÜR
ENTW ICKLUNGSHI LFESupply ofequipment foratechnical
school inSemarang ,INDONESIA .
Total cost :DM 1.300 .000Social84.972,68
DM 311.000

9.
1
Projectno.iNGOjBriefdescriptionoftheprojectTypeof
projectContra ,cut;or.
committed (u.a.)
OXG/76/77/B
I.B.O.distribution inZaireoftrainingmate­
rialtoincreaseawarenessofdevelop­
mentmatters,ZAIRE.
Totalcost:FB2.158.723-Social 21.467,36
PB1.073.368
ONG/77/77/UK
CAFODProvisionofpipingfordrinkingwater
supplyinGuayara-narin ,BOLIVIA.
Totalcost:£7.283.
|Social 8.739,6
£3.641,5
ONC/75/?7/UK jProductionofradioprogrammeson
POPULATION'CONCERN'familyplanningforBANGLADESH.
jTotalcost:£5-095Social 6.114
£2.547,5
o::c/79/77/UK
POPULATION CONCERNTodeveloptheskillofvillageleaders
inspreadingfamilyplanningmotivations
INDONESIA.
Totalcost:£8.210
1Social 9.852.
£4.105
O:;G/8O/77/UX i
POPULATIONCONCERN J|Tobringfamilyplanninginformationto
itheThaiHilltribes,THAILAND.
Totalcost:£J.080Social I
i
I
l8.49'J
£3.540
ONG/61/77/ux•
POPULATION CONCERN
I
iEstablishment ofinformation cumLiter­
acyCentrestopromotefamilyplanning
1inPAKISTAN..
Totalcost:£3.850Social 4.620
£1.925
0NG/82/77/UK
POPULATION CONCERNEstablishment ofawoman'sdevelopment
programmetopromotefamilyplanning
inGuaryaquil.ECUADOR.
Totalcost:£IO.790Social 12.948
£5.395
0NG/83/77A'
C.F.C.M.C.F.Infrastructure ,stocketc.for3model
farmstoencouragecommunityworkamong
theruralgeople.Bubaruka,RWANDA.
Totalcost:FF539-335Rural 45.011,06
FF250.000
0NG/34/77/F
C«C.F*DtConstruction andfittingoffacilities
tostoreandpreservericeinCan-tho,
VIETNAM
Totalcost:FF1.101.572Economic 100.000
FF555.419
ONG/83/77/D j
DEUTSCHS WELTHUNGER –.
HILFE IConstruction andfittingoutofasys­
temfordryingandstockingagricultural
productsintheregionsofAsuayand
iiapo,ECUADOR.
Totalcost:DM261.600Economic31.912,56
DM116.800

10.
Projectno.SeKGO!Briefdescriptionoftheproject
|Typeof
ProjectContribution
co-jnitlei(u.a.)
ONC/80/77/O
DEUTSCHER CARITAS-
VERBANDConstruction of300housesforearth­
quakevictimsinNICARAGUA.
Totalco3t:DM916.000Social 100.000
DM366.000
0NG/87/77/D
VffiLTFRISDK-ÎDIKNSTIntegratedlanddeveloppement project
inMaioIsland,CAPEVERDE.
Totalcost:1)M2.632.56ORural 99.234,97
DM363.200
ONG/83/77/UK
OXFAMImprovementofwatersupplyforvil-
!lagesintheKabeitaareabydeepening
thewells.Kabeita,YEMENARABREPUBUC
Totalcostt£14.443.Economic 17.160
!c7.150
I
0NG/89/77/UK%
CarriedovertoBudgetyear1978.I
i
ONG/90/77/UK
0XFAMClassroomblockfortheTanzanianSoci
etyforthedeaf.Dar-es-Salam,TANZANI
Totalcost:£42.402Social
V30.960
£12.900
ONG/91/77/uXCarriedovertobudgetyour1978.
ONG/92/77/U-X
0XFAMEquipmenttrainingand-buildingofarts
andcraftcentreintheRedCross
SchoolfortheblindatBerhaoipur,
Orissa,INDIA.
Totalcost:£5.323,71Social 6.384
£2.660
r
ONG/93/77/UK
S *CarriedovertoBudgetyewar1978.
\i
0NG/94/77/UKCarriedovertoBudgetyear1978■
i
ONC/95/77/UKCarriedovertoBudgetyear1978i
I _
ONG/96/77/UK
0XPAMConstruction ofWeavingHallandadmi­
nistrativebuildingstoencouragethe
carpetweavingtradeamongTibetansin
Dharamsala ,INDIA.
Totalcost!£13.050I
EconomicI
9.600
£4.000
ONG/97/77/UK I
OXI-'AMReconstruction and/orrepairtohouses
damagedordestroyedduringthecivil
warinNabaa/BourdjHammond,Beirut,
LEBANON.
Totalcost:£8.000
'j
iSocial 9.600
£4.000 .

11.
–■ 1 I
Projectno.AXGOi 1
!BriefdescriptionoftheprojectTypeof
projectContribuíion
co.T2itted(u.a.)
»
ONG/98/77/UK !CarriedovertoBudgetyear1978.
I
! : :
ONG/99/77/UK
0XFAM
IExtensionofaschoolfortheDeafto
providemoreclassroomsandhostelac­
commodationatRotmalana,MountLavinia
Colombo,SRILANKA
Totalcost:£5.78?,32
1 :Social 6.384
£2.660
ONG/IOO/77/IT
MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO .
EPACE!Develop;nentof150acre3oflandat
!VadugapattiVillane,ErodeTaluk,Com-
batoreDistrict,TamilNadu,INDIA.
Totalcost:Lit.61.585.303Rural I49.263,24
Lit.30.792.650
(WG/lOl/77/lT
MaiiiTeseTofurnishBoyraTechnicalSchoolwith
furtherequipmentandmachinerytoin­
creasethenumberofpupils,Boyra
lChulna,BANGLADESH .
TotalcostsLit.29.773.500Social 23.818,80
Lit.14.886.750
ONC/102/77/lT
ManiTese jConstruction ofthericemillat
Nungombe,Kivu,ZAIRE.
TotalcostsLit.3.800.000Economic 2.960
Lit.1.850.000
0NG/1O3/77/B
I.B.O.Printinganddistribution ofagricultu­
raltextbooksinthelanguagesCiluba£
Lingala,ZAIRE.
Totalcost:FB2.552.560
I: 'Social 25-521,4
FB1.276.070
OKG/l04/77/3
OXFAM-BELG IQUEConstruction andequipmentofanexten­
siontoaTrainingCentreforyoung
farmersinMonloundaye ,CAMEROON.
Totalcost:FB7.250.000Economic 72.500
FB'3.625.000
ONG/IO5/77/NL
CEBEM0SettingupatravellingBnbroidery
teachertotrainwomeninruralareas,
Kingston,JAMAICA.
Totalcost:fl.161.240Economic22.270,72
fl.80.620
ONG/IO6/77/B
iMissi-eprokuur 0.L.
VrouwVisitatieElectrification ofaschoolandsocial
complexinthecommuneofBulinga
RWANDA.
Totalcost:FB7.392.540Economic52.683,74
FB2.634.187
0NC/107/77/B
I.M.O.Construction andequipmentofacentre
fordevelopmentincludingfacilitiesfor
education,hygieneandmarketing,Kouy,
UPPERVOLTA
TotalcosttBF3.835.500Rural-
I16.340,82
FB817.041

12.
1
Projestno.&KGO jBrief description oftheprojectType of
project|Contribuí ion
|co:.raLttcd (u.a .)
ONG/lOS/77/D
Gemeinschaft zur ■
Förderung sozial -
medizinischer
StiftungenConstruction ofasocio-medical centre
inRoro-Sorosogan ,PHILLIPINES .
Total cost :DM 730.000Social 99-726,78
DM 365.000
■ONG/IO9/77/BI
Carried over toBudget year 1978 *i
oNG/no/77/uK
CAF0D
j
IEstablishment ofavocational training
centre topromote local handicrafts
andcreate jobs foryoung people *in
Quatre Bornes ,MAURITIUS .
Total cost :£83.334Economic 100.000
£ 41.667
!
j
ONG/lll/77/P
C.F.C.M. P.Equipment andsetting upofaproject
toimprove methods offarming and lo­
calconditions inthe province of
Kinynya ,BURUNDI
Total cost sFF562.364I
Economie j 46.991,55
JFF 261.000
I
i
I
I
OÎJG/H2/77/NL
CEBEM0Construction oftwofishing vessels to
promote thefishing industry .Monte­
video ,URUGUAY .
Total cost 1fl.5.657.106Economic j 100.000
1
|fl.362.000
!
I
ONG/113/77/NL
CEBEM0i
Toencourage community development by
bybringi jinformation and vocational
training topoorer groups insociety
inSantiago ,CHILE
Total cost'tfl.219.926I
Social
«r
26.642 ,54
fi. 96.446
0NG/114/77/B Carried over toBudget year 1978I ––
j
J
ONG/II5/77/D I
DEUTSCHE WELTHUNGER -1
HILFE !|
I
Construction ofabuilding for food j
education courses inMadras ,INDIA .
Total cost tDM561.000Socialr
77.049,18
DM •282.000
I
I
.ONG/II6/77/D (Equipping acentre fortechnical educa–
Sozial und Entwick -tion inPedro II,State ofPiaui ,
lungshilfe des •BRAZIL .
Kolpingswerkes jTotal cost :DM76.000
i
1
• _________Social 10.382,51
DM 38.000
ONG/117/77/F
Secours Catholique!Construction and setting upofasocio -
-medical centre atSolur ,Kornataka ,,
INDIA .
Total cost tFF617.800Social 55-993,76
FF 311.000
«

13.
Projectno.£XGOiBriefdescription oftheprojectTyp®of
projectContribution
co^nittcd(u.a.)
ONG/l18/77A'K
SAVETHECHILDREN
-FUliDTobuildaschoolbuildingforhandi­
cappedchildreninMah£,SEYCHELLES.
Totalcost:£12.800Social 15.360.
£.6.4OO
ONG/119/77/B
ONG/120/77/UK
0IJC/l2l/77/uK
O;.tG/I22/77/U;C
oxG/123/77/uK
oNG/124/77/uxCarriedovertoBudgetyear1978.
|
ONG/125/77/UiC
OXFAH
I:Aneducationprogrammetoteachpeople
howtobuildcheapearthquakeresistant
housesusinglocalmaterials,GUATE-IAIA.
Totalcost1£29.713,66
iSocialj32.603,38
£13.584,74
0«G/126/77/UK
ONG/127/77/UK
ONG/128/77/UK.
ONG/129/77/UK
0NG/l30/77/UK
ONG/I31/77/UK
: ICarriedovertoBudgetyear1978.
1♦
1

TABLE III
Breakdown by "beneficiary country

s
7
i
i
î.•
■i.
♦
ι"oor-r-o,i"ctn IRofor"ncg !^Χ<·^η»τ!·, <rTT.jy-
'BAKGUL2SH
f
i5oiic/20/77/iT
OMG/24/77/IRL.
cwc/30/77/iRL
ong/78/77/UK
oNc/ioi/77/iT17.600
46.727,62
60.000
6.114
23.818)80
154.260,42
BENIN il;ONC/59/77/LUX 30.000
BOLIVIA 1
jONG/77/77/UK 8.739,60
;BFAZIL 2.ONC/52/77/lT
ONC/II6/77/D5.440
10.382,51
15.822,51
I
BUIïUNDII
2ONG/62/76/77/lT
ONG/lll/77/P74.320
46.991,55
121,311,55
;CAM2R00N 1OÎJG/IO4/77/B 72.500
CAPSV2RD3 . 1ONG/87/77/D 99.234,97
CKII3 1I
ONG/II3/77/NL 26.642,54
ÎOTSD'IVOIRii 2ONG/7/77/?
ONG/19/77/IT34.952,71
100.000
134.952,71
ECUADOR
I4ONC/94/76/77/D I
ONG/29/77/IHL
OIJG/82/77/UK j
ONG/85/77/D
I100.000
12.000
12.948
31.912,56
156.860,56
3THI0PIA
|I
2
IONG/65/76/77/IT
ONG/36/77/P89.600
56.470,88
146.070,88
;abon ■10NG/51/77/DV»i40.983,61
;UATE.ÎAIA 2ONC/45/77/UK
ONG/125/77/UK
I10.396,80
32.603,38
t
l43.000,18
<1·

'J
oj*••y1'*"irnt+j ^ΓΊ;.'"Ν11·!·.'>" Η*·-■'vlA":r!\\r
HAIM;VOLTA 6;
i
»OMC/10/77/D
ONG/21/77/IT
IONG/v/n/p
OIJC/64/77/3
ONG/71/77/P
ONC/107/77/B
161.738,26
31.984
90.678,94
10.947,60
83.671,97
16.340,82
.295-361,59
INDIA 15 ONG/3/77/IRL *
ONC/4/77/IHL,
0NG/16/77/D
ONG/26/77/IHL
OXG/49/77/D
0NG/30/77/D
OMG/",3/77/DK:
O.NG/S4/77/DK
O::G/55/('7/D:<
O:.TG/69/77/UK
oiiG/92/77/uK
0NG/96/77/UK
CWG/IOO/77/IT
0NG/113/77/D
ONG/117/77/P11.323,20
2.311,18
16.771,31
2.7?6
59.846,18
65.705,28
24.402
12.231,07
2.745,20
98.793,84
6.384
9.600
49.263,24
77.04?,18
55.993,76 ■
49:.01,24
WDORESIA 7
«0NG/8/77/NI,
ONC/9/77/NL
ONG/35/77/UK
0KG/47/77/NL
ONG/48/77/NL
0NG/75/77/D
ONG/79/77/UK15.294,20
20.511,05
72.055,22
11.524,30
14.585,64
84.972,68
9.852
223.?--5,10
AXAICA 1ONG/IO5/77/NL 22.2-0,72
ORDAIi 1ONC/44/77/UK•<■ 5.53^,16
ARRA 5'
1ONG/15/77/DX
ONG/41/77/IRL
ONG/42/77/iRL
ONG/43/77/IRL
ONG/65/77/IT•23.254,40
.2.220
8.400
1.440
48.000
63.3:-:,40
SBANON 3
ΙONG/ll/77/P
OHG/62/77/B
ONG/97/77/UK
.I
I
!16.203,98
34.704
9.600
60.507,98

't. 1 Onr :vv/v:lt,y cont."j.Vuii:r.ir.U-'.s
MALI 1 ·ONG/37/77/F I
('>7.660,97
MAURITIUS 2 ONG/46/77/B
ONG/IIO/77/UK
*•16.200
100.000
116.200
NEPAL 2 ONG/18/77/UK
ONG/32/77/UK30.000
28.200
.■>8.200
NICARAGUA 1 ONG/86/77/D 100 .000
KICERIA
I '1I
jOiïC/l/77/lRI* 2.472
PAKISTAN 1 OMG/81/77/UK J 4.620
PHILLIPINES 1 ΟΝσ/108/77/ϋ 99.726,78
RWANDA 4 0N0/17/77/3
0NG/25/77/B
O.VG/33/77/?
ONG/IO0/77/D68.000
19.580 .
45.011,06
52.683,74
185.274,80
SENEGAL 1 ONG/14/77/P 27.006,64
SETCHELLES•>
-r ONG/H8/77/UK 15-360
SIERTtA LEONE 5 ong/23/77/it
ONG/27/77/IRL
ong/28/77/ihl
onc/39/77/irl
ONG/60/77/iT5.632
3.840
1.872
3.792
9.600
24.736
SRI LANKA
«2 ONG/4O/77/IRL
ONG/99/77/UK12.000
"6.384
18.384
SOUTH KOREA 2 ONG/73/77/D
ONG/74/77/D68.306,01
50.000
118 .106,01
SUBAN 1 ONG/31/77/UK 8.7">9 ,94
SWAZILAND1 j
jONG/68/77/NL 84.5.'.' ,62

,.-> 7.-»O L
TANZAXIA
THAILAND
TR1NIDAD
TUNISLA
URUGUAY
VIETNAM
iSXENARA3SEP.
ZAIR2
ΖΑ.<3ΙΑ5 ONG/2/77/IRL
ONO/5/77/UK
ONG/3V77/NL
ONG/72/77/UK
ONG/90/77/UK
3
îONO/88/76/77/D
ONG/6/77/UK
ONG/8O/77/UK•
1ONG/67/77/NL
1ONG/38/77/B
1ONC/H2/77/NL
4;ONC/85/76/77/IT
IoiJc/M/77/?'
0:^/^,6/77/F
0NG/84/77/P
1ONG/88/77/UK
10NG/76/77/B
0NG/102/77/B
0NG/103/77/B
5
'ONG/41/76/77/iRL
ONG/42/75/77/lRL
ONG/22/77/iT
ONG/58/77/F
ONG/65/77/IRLCo-i-nv'.itycor-'-
1.680
100.000
19.113,24
33.059,61
30.950
38.524,59
56.274,76
8.496?iV.itionir.UA3
100.000
10.602,65
31-507,75
100.000
21.467,36
2.960
25.521,40
6.513,90
1.328,80
27.475,20
29.383,22
9.900,00184.817,85
103.295,35
33.125,70
32.000
100.000
242.310,41
17.160
49.948,76
74.601.12
Breahdo-.mby-iron,ofapprovedrro/joct3in1977(uAs)
Africa 1.855.145,41
Asia •1.523.099,31
Centraland
LatinAmerica *451*065»39
KiddleEast "115.303,14
Caribbean . ':55.396.42

TABLEIV
Classification ofprojectsapprovedin1977
Noof
projectBAmountin
u.a.*
I.EconomicDevelopment
1.AgricultureandFisheries I14 508.881.12,7
2.SmallenterprisesandCommerce j12 358.674 9,0
3.Infrastructure (irrieationeto).14 383.123 9,6
II.SocialDevelopment
4.EducationandTraining 27- 874-546 21,9
5.Health22 646.543 16,2
6.Habitat,communitycentres,crechcs
etc.509.599 12,7
I •
III.IntegratedRuralDevelopment 13 718.638 18,0
113 4.000.000 100,ο

TABLE V
Breakdown byNGQ ofprojects
approved in1Q77

.•
■■ i
îiC-0 !
'an?.1Cd-r?HY |ccr:7?.:i?{cc:rr?.i~?;c ::.i->.ua^
LeaA^îi3deCata^ara IOKG/17/77/BIRwanda I όα.ΟΟΟ
Avo«*elaHivelauie35 IF33.400.000
1410Waterloo I
a-.iraideetFraternité IOKG/25/77/BRwanda I19.580
–-eiuConraerce72 IOHG/45/77/BXauntiua I16.200
.1040Smxelles IOîiG/a/n/BHauteVolta I10.947,50
46.727.60
PB2.336.330
T-0. IOÎÎG/33/77/3Tunesia 22.000
;:m-sesteer.veg 573 I0KG/76/77/3Zaïre 21.467,36
i030-Keverlee ICKiG/103/77/3Zaire 25.521,40
- "- 73.733,75
F33-949.438
;elta7Bel^i-cps® 0NC/62/77/B 1Lebanon 34.704
.-uoduKoyer302FB1.735.200
1040Bruxelles
,'xfa'aBelgique 0NG/104/77/BICameroon 72.500
O.rueceCornell FB3.625.000
1050Bruxelles*
Missieprokuur0.L.Vrouw CWG/106/77/BIRwanda 52.633,74
Visitatie F32.634.187
Jentssstr.3
3-9110-St.Aaar.-isber^
Γ.Χ.Ο. .œiG/107/77/BIHauteYolta 16.340,82
'osstr.15 ΡΒ617.041
î-3ol>Brustea
369.944,92
FB18.497.245
a
I/•
» ! ■.!1 il

2.
NGO REP . COUKTRX COKKUKITY COî;T,tIBUTIO ::inUAa
Afr:kanse Lae.---jf6nd
11Sfrtoftevej
">K2550 Vedbae !:
■;>V>ePierre' s/rnnjaeld
'r^Tiodtave jli
K-2700 Helle ."-oONG/I5/77/DK
ONG/53/77/DK
ONG/54/77/DK
ONC/55/77/DKKenya
India
India
India23.234,40
DKr.174.403
24.402
12.201,07
2.745,20
39.343,27
ΓΚτ .295 .112
62.602,67 .
DKr .469.520
»
;
r-

NGO REP. coir.mtY CCI"JINITY COfTTIilBUTICU ir.UAs
Zentralstelle fürEntwick-
lun.'tshilfe
Mozartstr.19
D-SlOOAachen
DeutscheV.'elthingerhilfe
ûder.auerallee ^9
0-5300Bonn
irotfurdieWo.t
jtaJ'fleticergs *•.('.î6
J-7Stuttgart
RotaryInternational
D63Mannhe_n1.A2.4
DeutscherCar.:asVerband
-.'iTitererstr.i~-i9-7SOOrVeiburr
■'e11friedendier.st
'ebenstr.1
>-Berlin
'e.T.einschaft .-.-r-?5rderung
uozialr.eäizinissher
otiftunken
ObereAnferstr.7
D-84?0A-berg-AiT.ersricht
Sozial-undEhtw.cklungs-
hilfedesKolpm^swerkes e.V,
Kolpmgsplatz 5–11
D-5000Köln1ONG/88/76/77/D
0Κ0/ΐό/77/Ί>
0NG/73/77/D
0KG/74/77/D
ΟΝα/75/77/Β
OMC/94/76/77/D
0NG/49/77/D
ONG/50/77/D
0NG/85/77/D
ONG/II5/77/D
ONG/IO/77/D
ONG/5I/77/D
ONO/86/77/D
ONC/87/77/D
0NG/108/77/D
ONG/II6/77/DThailand 1
India j
SouthKorea
SouthKorea
Indonesia
Ecuador
.India
India
Ecuador
India
Haute-Volta
Gabon
Nicaragua
CapeVerde
Philippines
Brazil38.524,59
16.771,31
68.306,01
50.000
84.9/2,63
100.000
59.846,18
65.706,29
31.912,55
77.049,13258.574,5?
M946.333
334.514,20
DM1.224.221 ,U
61.733,25
DM225.952
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM40.92sol
150.C00
100.000
355.000
99.234,9/
363.199,99
99.726,78
365.OOO
10.382,51
37.999,99
1.005.154,92
DM3.678,867

•Y
FRANCE
J7G0 CûtrjTîîY C0IKW7I:?TC0Ï;T?.I2OTTC!TinUA.S
ColiteCatholiquecontrela
FaimetpourleDéveloppe­
ment(CO'D)
47IquaidesGrands
Augustins
P-7S006Paris
CIÎ'JVDS
17oruedeGrenelle
P-75007
FondationDelta7
3ruedeRichelieu
t'-ïr>001Parm
CentreInternat •ona.1de
Développement etdeRech*rch «
SPIAutrêches
,?–60350CUJse-la-Motte
recoursCatho*.que
".OorueduBa-î-
•1-7>341ParisCedex07
..F.D.I.
saròdeVeràur.j.ì
-6>236Lyon'JlZLX
>!.P.C.K.C.F.
;hjeCa.T.bronne!2
F-75015ParisONG/7/77/P
ONG/ll/77/P
OHC/37/77/P
OKC/34/77/F
ONG/I4/77/F
ONG/34/77/P
ONG/56/77/P
ONC/3Ô/77/P
ONG/57/77/F
01ÎG/58/77/P
ONG/I17/77/F
ONG/71/77/P
ONG/83/77/P
ONG/I11/77/pCoted'Ivoire
Lebanon
Mali
Vietnam
Sénégal
Vietnam
Vietnaa
Ethiopia
Haute-Volta
Za.Tibia
India
Haute-Volta
[Rwanda
Burundi34.952,71
16,203,93
57.660,97
100.000
FF
PP
10.802,66
31.'>07,75
FP
56.470,53
90.673,93
FP
29.383,22
55.993,76
PP
PP
45.011,05
46.991,55
PF208.817,0ό
1.159.812,96
27.00o,54
150.000
42.310,/.:
235.000,0 -;
147.149,3:
817.292
85-375,^3
474.199,97
83.671,97
454.730,02
92.002,61
510.999,98
686.336,08
PP3.812.041

\
'trfland •^■ [
NGO*
REF . COU1ÎTRY COTEOJKITY CO.VTaiBUTj
10"inTJAs 1
•CONCESN
1,Upper Ca.-3den St.
Dublin 2ONG/41/76/77/lRL
Oi:c/n2/76/77/lRIi
ONC/3/77/IHL
ONG/4/77/IRL
ONG/24/77/lRL
0NG/30/77/IRLZambia
Zambia
India
India
Bangladesh
Bangladesh6.513,90
1.328,80
11.323,20
2.311,18
46.727,62
60.000
I
123.204,70 !
£ 53.419
Ciorta
;.stc.n Kouso
Asten Place
Dublin 2
IOUG/l/77/lRL
0:;G/2/77/I8L
OUG/26/77/IRL
O:;G/?7/77/IRL
O::G/23/77/IHL
O:JG/29/77/1RL
OHG/39/77/IaL
ONTG/40/77/lRL
ONG/41/77/IRL
ONG/42/77/lRI'
0NG/43/77/IRLNigeria
Tanzania
India
Sierra Lcone
Sierra Lcone '
Scuador
Sierra Lcone
Sri Lanka
Xcnya
Kenya
Konya ;2.472
1.630
2.796
3.540
1.872
12.000
3.792
12.000
2.220
8.400
1.440
£52.5I?
21.3iO
Trocaire I
I69Booterstown Ave
BlaSkrock
CoDublinONG/66/77/IRL Zaabia
£'3.9-0
4.1?5
£
«190.616,70
79.424
«
«ι
* !Ν«

ITALY
Î'CO ΉΕ7.i
CCUJTRY co::::ji:iyycci;thip.utic :;inuas
IaYVoluntcercInternational
Community(L.V.I.A.)
ViaStoppini31
1-12100CuneoONC/62/76/77/IT
ONG/65/76/77/ITBurundi
Ethiopia74.320
89.600
163.520
Lit102.450.000
OruppoAnele
ViaSantaTeresa23.
10121-Torino0NG/85/76/77/ITVietnam 100.000
Lit62.500.000
ComunitàLiaioi
MiaaionariCattolici
ViaB.3uo3211)A/i
1-1612-5CenavaONG/19/77/IT
ICôted'Ivoire 100.000
Lit62.500.COO
.'■'aniTese
ViaCavenachi4
MilanoONG/20/77/IT
O:;G/2I/77/IT
0;vG/?2/77/lT
O::G/23/77/IT
ONG/S2/77/IT
ONC/60/77/IT
o:jg/ioi/77/it
ONG/102/77/ITBan^laáosh
Haute-Volta
Zambia
SierraLeone
Bras;1
SierraLeone
Bariijladeah
Zai're
I17.600
31.^34
27.475,20
5.632
5.440
9.600
23.818,8
2.960
124.510
Lit.77.818.750
"ov-M.entoSviluppoePace
ViaV-a^enta12bis
I-10128TorinoONC/65/77/lT
ONC/lOO/77/lT•Kenya
India'43.000
4?.?~'3,24 97.263,24
£it.60.792.650
585.698
"Lit.365.061.400
\
\
Ii.
(
%V
•«
I
\
«
I
«*

I
VI
' *
I.
KGOl
rsf/»
CCUflTRY commpjiïy CCÎITHIBUTIC ::inUAB
Action Formation deCadres ONG/c_j9/7?/UJX Bénin 30.000
2}Ave Gaston Diderich
.
1rLuxembourg -Ville F.Lux .1.500.000
t)
»•
t'
j
!
1
1
!
j«
i»
1
t
!
i'i

ξ
KLTJ13r.\rD3
KGO :RBF
I•COUNTilY CCMÎX'KITÏ CONTHIFUTIC.' !inUAs
CE3?i.::)
VanAl!:eTa3elaan 1
I)eniiaaf7ONG/8/7//NL
QV.G/^/RI/^H
ONG/('>Y/77/.VL
OiVG/lO;/N/:<L
OI*G/II2/7J/:;L,
OKG/113/77/NLIndonesia
Indonesia
Trinidad
Janaica
Uruguay
Chile15.294,20
20.511,05
33.125,70
22.?70,72
100.WO
26.54?,54
*•
I 217.844,23
T.783.11
NOVIB
Axaliastr..5–7
DenHaagONG/33/77/NL
ONG/47/77/NL
0;MG/43/77/«L,Tanzania
Indonesia
Indonesia
J
i19.118,24
n.524,30
14.535,64
45.223,13
fi.163.725.C-1
ICCO
Stadhouàorslaan 43
Utre'ht
1ONG/63/77/î.'LSwaziland 84.577,62
r:.306.171
1347.>yj
"r:.1258.493
t
?
■
à
fi
il
Ij 1■.
i
F
♦1I
-■r
i

rorr.,DKxrnr-oi.:
IIGO REF. COUHTIîY COÎ'JTEITY .CONTRIBUTION inUAo
AfricantfedicalandResearch
Foundation(iLMHF)
A?7DoverSt.
Lo.idonWIX3PA
Oxfü-a
274JJanburrRoad
Oxford0X27D2
'Save"theChildrenFund
1)7Clapna:3Road
ILondonSW-JOPT
CATOD
PIASohoSq
LondonWIV6NR
InstituteforCultural
Affairs
BridgeHouse
Pre3tonRd
l3leofDogs
London£14
ConcernUniversal
6Esplanade
Liverpool L22SPT
PapulationConcern
KarparetPyl<eHouse
27~MortimerSt
LondonWIN7RJONC/5/77/UK
ONG/6/77/UK
ONG/25/77/UK
0:.'G/44/77/U<C
ONG/45/77/UK
ON'G/33/77/^
οΝσ/90/77/υκ
ONG/92/77/UK
ONG/96/77/UK
ONG/57/77/UK
o:.G/j)/77/UK
o;;G/I?VV7/^K
ONC/18/77/UK
0.VG/32/77/UX
O.NG/113/77/UK
ONG/31/77/UK
ONG/77/77/UK
ong/i10/77/inc
ONG/69/77/UK
ONG/72/77/UK
ONG/78/77/UK
ONG/79/77/UK
o:.TC/80/77/UK
ONG/81/77/UX
ONG/82/77/UKTanzania
Thailand
Indonesia
Jordan
Guatemala
Ye:nenArabRep.
Tanzania
India
Indiaj
Lebanon .'
SriLanka
Guatemala
Népal
Népal ■
Seychelles
Sudan
Bolivia
Mauritius
India
Tanzania
Bangladesh
Indonesia
Thailand
Pakistan
Ecuador55.?74,75
72.055,22
5.635,16
10.396,80
17.160
30.Ç-5O
6.384
9.600
9.600
6.384
32.603,38
30.000
23.J'OO
15.;;60
8.759,94
8.739,60
100.000
6.114
9.852
8.496
4.620
12.948100.000
£41.667
257.053,32
£107.106
73.5^0
30.650
117.499,54
£48.958,5c
93.793,8/.
£41.164,1
33.059,61
13.774,85
42.030
£17.5J2
721.V.')j,20
£300.632

FINANCIAL RECORD
ThisCommunication doesnotinvolveanyadditionalexpenditurefrom
theCommunitybudgetsinceitisessentiallyareportontheusemade
ofappropriations tinderthe1977budget. *