RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
of 24 April 2007
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on the discharge for the implementation of
the budget of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the financial year 2005
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
— having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the
financial year 2005 (1),
— having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the European Agency for Safety
and Health at Work for the financial year 2005, together with the Agency's replies (2),
— having regard to the Council's Recommendation of 27 February 2007 (5711/2007 —C6-0080/2007),
— having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,
— having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial
Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (3), and in particular
Article 185 thereof,
— having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18 July 1994 establishing a European Agency
for Safety and Health at Work (4), and in particular Article 14 thereof,
— having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the
framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC,Euratom) No 1605/2002 (
5), and in particular Article 94 thereof,
— having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee
on Employment and Social Affairs (A6-0105/2007),
A. whereas the Court of Auditors stated that it obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts for
the financial year ended 31 December 2005 were reliable and that the underlying transactions, taken as a
whole, were legal and regular,
B. whereas on 27 April 2006 Parliament gave discharge to the director in respect of the implementation of
the Agency's budget for the 2004 financial year (6) and in the resolution accompanying the discharge
decision Parliament, inter alia,
— welcomed the reduction in carry-overs achieved,
— urged the Agency to put in place detailed rules for the implementation of its new financial
regulation and internal control procedures based on risk analysis as soon as possible,15.7.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 187/115
(1) OJ C 266, 31.10.2006, p. 19.
(2) OJ C 312, 19.12.2006, p. 24.
(3) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006,
p. 1).
(4) OJ L 216, 20.8.1994, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1112/2005 (OJ L 184, 15.7.2005, p. 5).
(5) OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.
(6) OJ L 340, 6.12.2006, p. 96.
— insisted that the Agency respects the rules concerning the duration of framework contracts,
— expected the Agency, in future, to include negative balances at year and in amending budgets for the
following financial year;
General points concerning the majority of EU Agencies requiring individual discharge
1. Considers that the ever-growing number of Community Agencies and the activities of certain of them do
not seem to form part of an overall policy framework, and that the remits of some Agencies do not
always reflect the real needs of the Union or the expectations of its citizens, and notes that in generalterms the Agencies do not always have a good image or a good press;
2. Invites the Commission therefore to define an overall policy framework for the setting up of new
Community Agencies and to present a cost-benefit study before the setting up of any new Agency, whilebeing careful to avoid any overlap of activities between Agencies or with the remits of other Europeanorganisations;
3. Calls on the Court of Auditors to give its opinion on the cost-benefit study before Parliament takes its
decision;
4. Invites the Commission to present every five years a study on the added value of every existing Agency;
invites all relevant institutions in the case of a negative evaluation of the added value of an Agency to takethe necessary steps by reformulating the mandate of that Agency or by closing it;
5. Considers it regrettable, given the growing number of regulatory Agencies, that the negotiations on the
draft interinstitutional agreement on the operating framework for the European regulatory Agencies havenot yet been concluded, and calls on the relevant departments of the Commission, in consultation withthe Court of Auditors, to do their utmost to ensure that the agreement is brought to a rapid conclusion;
6. Notes that the Commission's budgetary responsibility calls for closer linking of the Agencies to the
Commission; calls on the Commission and the Council to take all necessary steps to give theCommission a blocking minority in the supervisory bodies of the regulatory Agencies by 31 December2007 and to provide for such a minority from the outset when new Agencies are set up;
7. Invites the Court of Auditors to create an additional chapter in its Annual Report, devoted to all Agencies
to be discharged under the Commission's accounts in order to have a much clearer picture of the use ofEU funds by Agencies;
8. Recalls the principle according to which all Community Agencies, whether subsidised or not, are subject
to discharge by the Parliament, even where a discharge authority exists by virtue of their constitutivetexts;
9. Calls on the Court of Auditors to perform performance audits for all Agencies and to report back to the
relevant committees of Parliament, including the Committee on Budgetary Control;
10. Notes that the number of Agencies is constantly increasing and that, in accordance with the
Commission's political responsibility for the operation of the Agencies, which goes far beyond merelogistical support, there is an even higher need for the Directorates-General of the Commission chargedwith the setting up and monitoring of Agencies to develop a common approach to the Agencies;considers that a structure similar to the one created by the Agencies for coordination among the DGsconcerned would be a pragmatic way forward towards a common approach by the Commission on allmatters relating to the Agencies;L 187/116 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.7.2008
11. Invites the Commission to improve administrative and technical support to the Agencies, taking into
account the growing complexity of the Community's administrative rules and technical problems;
12. Notes the lack of a disciplinary body in any of the Community Agencies, and calls on the Commission to
take the necessary steps to ensure that such a mechanism is rapidly put in place;
13. Welcomes the considerable improvements in the coordination among the Agencies, which allows them
to tackle recurring problems and makes cooperation with the Commission and Parliament moreefficient;
14. Takes the view that the establishment by a number of Agencies of a shared support service aimed at
making their computerised financial management systems consistent with those of the Commission is ameasure that should be taken further and extended;
15. Calls upon the Agencies to improve their cooperation and benchmarking with actors in the field; urges
the Commission to adopt any measures it considers necessary to help the Agencies enhance their imageand raise the profile of their activities;
16. Calls upon the Commission to come up with a proposal to harmonise the format of the annual reporting
by the Agencies and to develop performance indicators which would allow a comparison of theirefficiency;
17. Invites the Agencies to present at the beginning of every year performance indicators against which they
could be measured;
18. Invites all Agencies to increasingly use SMART objectives which should lead to more realistic planning
and implementation of goals;
19. Agrees with the Court of Auditors that the Commission also bears responsibility for the (financial)
management of the Agencies; therefore, urges the Commission to monitor and where necessary directand help the management of the different Agencies, especially in relation to the proper application oftender procedures, transparency of recruitment procedures, sound financial management (underspendingand overbudgeting) and most importantly the proper application of the rules concerning the internalcontrol framework;
20. Considers that the Agencies' work programmes should express their contributions in operational and
measurable terms and that due consideration should be given to the Commission's Internal ControlStandards;
Specific points
21. Notes that the commitment rate for appropriations entered in the budget for the financial year 2005 was
over 90 % and that the carry-over rate remained high for operating expenditure (Title III), at 30 %,whereas the cancellation rate for appropriations carried over was close to 15 %; invites the Agency toimprove its programming and adhere to it more strictly; notes that the management of the budget showsa high number of transfers of appropriations between budget lines and considers that the supportingdocumentation for these transfers is inadequate; invites the Agency to guarantee that the rules and limitsapplicable to transfers are observed;
22. Considers the Agency to be a source of important information for all EU institutions, for political
decision-making, for the business world and for the general public;
23. Notes that the implementation of the internal control system was not yet complete in 2005 and that the
Governing Board had not adopted any internal control standards; deplores the fact that there is no riskanalysis and no checklists to meet the needs of authorising officers and staff who perform operationalchecks; invites the Agency to tackle these issues in the interests of transparency and efficiency;15.7.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 187/117
24. Notes that the general implementing provisions concerning the recruitment of staff to the Agency do not
specify the criteria and formalities to be observed at the various stages of the selection of candidates;insists that decisions taken in this regard must be rigorously documented in order to ensure thetransparency and impartiality of decisions made;
25. Considers it regrettable that in public procurement procedures often no supporting evidence was given
for the tender evaluation committee's assessments of the quality of the bids; considers it regrettablefurther that the evaluation reports were signed only by the authorising officer responsible and not by allthe members of the tender evaluation committee; invites the Agency to put even more effort into thecorrect documentation of procurement procedures;
26. Welcomes the fact that the Agency has improved its methods of communication and that greater use is
being made of its specialist know-how by small and medium-sized enterprises in particular.L 187/118 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.7.2008