39. Considers that the financial involvement of regional and local players or greater participation by
local associations and the private sector is essential;
40. Calls on the Commission and Member States to involve their local and regional authorities, the
European Parliament and the Committee of the Regions in the drafting of a working programme for theObservatory;
41. Regrets that the Commission document contains no recommendations to the Member States
designed to simplify procedures and national legal provisions concerning the submission and examination
of projects by the national authorities or financing implementation and control;
42. Calls on the national and local authorities to make payments to final beneficiaries as speedily as
possible;
43. Calls on the Commission to inform Parliament regularly about the implementation of Interreg; a
requirement more justified than ever given the incomplete nature of its proposal;
44. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and the governments of the
Member States.
5. Rural development (Leader+)
A5-0024/2000
European Parliament resolution on the draft communication from the Commission to the Member
States laying down guidelines for the Community initiative for rural development (Leader+)
(COM(1999) 475 Fdash C5-0259/1999 Fdash 1999/2185(COS))
The European Parliament,
5dash having regard to the draft communication from the Commission (COM(1999) 475 5dash C5-0259/1999),5dash having regard to its resolution of 5 May 1994(
1) on the future of Community initiatives under the
Structural Funds (Leader II programme),
5dash having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provi-
sions on the Structural Funds(2) from 2000,
5dash having regard to its resolution of 19 November 1998(3) and its decision of 6 May 1999(4) on the
general provisions on the Structural Funds,
5dash having regard to the Code of Conduct(5) on the implementation of structural policies by the Commi-
ssion,
5dash having regard to the conclusions of the Berlin European Council of 24 and 25 March 1999,
5dash having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and
improvement of the budgetary procedure(6) and the financial perspective which forms an integral
part thereof,
5dash having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure,5dash having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion
of the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (A5-0024/2000),
(1) OJ C 205, 25.7.1994, p. 412.
(2) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 1.
(3) OJ C 379, 7.12.1998, p. 164.
(4) OJ C 279, 1.10.1999, p. 292.
(5) OJ C 279, 1.10.1999, p. 488.
(6) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.C 339/52 EN 29.11.2000 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 15 February 2000
A. whereas it has a highly favourable opinion of the implementation of the Leader initiative, which pro-
duced positive results in stages I and II,
B. whereas the Leader programme, in its phases Leader I and Leader II, has aroused a great deal of inter-
est and has contributed to increasing the rural world’s sense of identity,
C. whereas the symbol ‘+’ after the title of the Leader programme is intended to give an explicit indica-
tion of its increased degree of innovation in comparison with previous Leader programmes,
D. whereas any new rural development strategy must be based on the encouragement of agricultural
activity, since the countryside cannot exist without farming or farmers,
E. whereas all Leader projects should take full account of environmental issues and the economic and
social cohesion of the rural world, from an extremely innovative strategic viewpoint,
F. whereas it is advisable to continue the Leader experiment as a means of supporting rural areas’ capa-
city to respond to the challenge of changes brought about by the reform of the CAP, the resultingincreased importance of product quality, a greater awareness of environmental protection, the globa-lisation of the economy, and the spread of new technology,
G. whereas the fundamental objective of Leader+ is to encourage original strategies for integrated eco-
nomic and sustainable development, based on new ways of enhancing the natural and cultural heri-tage, for increasing employment rates, and for improving the organisational capacities of local com-munities,
H. whereas cooperation should be considered to be an essential part of the programme,I. whereas in contrast to Leader I and Leader II, under which the programme was exclusively aimed at
zones eligible under Objectives 1/6 and 5b, all areas in the Union will be able to join Leader+,although Member States will have the power to restrict the programme’s application to certain ruralareas,
J. whereas in contrast to Leader I and Leader II, which made provision for public and private rural sector
collective bodies to be included among the beneficiaries, under Leader+ the only beneficiaries will belocal action groups (LAGs),
K. whereas the LAGs will have to consist of a balanced and representative selection of partners drawn
from the different socio-economic sectors in the area concerned,
L. whereas at the decision-making level the economic and social partners, and the associations, will have
to make up at least 50% of a local partnership,
M. whereas the Leader+ initiative is divided into three sections at the operational level:
(a) support for integrated territorial rural development strategies of a pilot nature based on the bot-
tom-up approach and horizontal partnerships,
(b) support for inter-territorial and transnational cooperation,(c) the networking of all rural areas in the European Union, whether or not beneficiaries under
Leader+, and all rural development actors,
N. having regard to the overall context of the common agricultural policy in which Leader+ will have to
find a place, following the conclusion of Agenda 2000 with its creation of the two-pillar model foragricultural subsidy, with the forthcoming agreements on agriculture and rural areas in connectionwith the new world trade round, and with the planned enlargement of the EU,
1. Approves of the reworking of the Leader programme in the innovative shape of Leader+, and regards
it as essential, in the light of the experiences gained with the earlier Leader I and II projects, that theparticipation of the widest possible spread of organisations should also be guaranteed for Leader+;29.11.2000 EN C 339/53 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 15 February 2000
2. Considers it vital that a dynamic strategy for rural development, benefiting from the support of the
Community’s Leader+ initiative, is based on the development of agricultural activity in all regions of theEU, in the context of its direct effects on economic activity both upstream and downstream and onemployment levels and the preservation of essential public services, the aim being to combat the desertifi-cation of the countryside;
3. Welcomes the fact that the Commission, without prejudice to the distinctive features of particular
regions, identifies priority areas for action; notes, however, that 5dash alongside the use of information tech-nology in rural areas, the improvement of quality of life in the countryside, the promotion of local pro-
ducts, strategies to optimise the use of natural and cultural resources, create equal opportunities for
women and men and improve young people’s chances of getting a job in rural areas 5dash particular stressshould be placed on general social and job-creating measures in structurally disadvantaged areas; calls inthis connection for the programmes to aid development in regions with a mainly rural structure, in orderto launch economic development in innovative and job-creating sectors and thus to halt and reverse thegrowing shortage of local workers in these areas in particular;
4. Considers it useful, for the purposes of avoiding overlapping of the various initiatives and duplication
of financing, that the Leader+ initiative applies to areas which traditional rural development programmesdo not cover; this complementarity is also true of the new Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 on rural devel-opment and the Interreg and EQUAL initiatives;
5. Considers it useful that the Community initiative should complement the other Structural Fund initia-
tives in the context of programmes for the Objective 1 and Objective 2 areas, and should remain applic-able to all rural areas; it is therefore essential that the programmes for implementation under Communityinitiatives should be coordinated with the Member States’ planning documents and with the operationalprogrammes;
6. Notes with approval the specific provisions on the creation of a network to achieve the exchange of
experience, information and know-how and believes that participation by Leader+ in a European networkof rural regions is necessary also for regions not participating in the Leader+ programme;
7. Emphasises that inter-territorial and transnational cooperation together with the bottom-up
approach, which requires the local population to continue to play an important part in defining and
implementing programmes within the framework of an approach reaching from the bottom to the top,have overall worked well despite regional divergences and welcomes the continuation and enhancement ofthis process;
8. Welcomes in particular the fact that, although the Member States have a free choice in the approval
of measures, the Commission favours the use of global grants in accordance with Articles 9 (i) and 27 ofthe General Regulation;
9. Has doubts about the adequacy of the planned financing, in view of the extension of the programme
to the whole of the European Union, with a programming period increased from six to seven years, and is
concerned that the financial framework of € 2,02 billion for Leader+ for the period 2000-2006 may prove
too tight;
10. Welcomes the fact that the Leader+ programme can be applied selectively in the Member States, so
that financing is not too broadly, and hence too thinly, spread;
11. Stresses that an action plan must cover a large number of initiatives and proposals, so as to deal
with local problems and meet local expectations, to achieve results in the areas in question and thus tocontribute to strengthening a dynamic local development process;
12. Calls upon the Commission and national and regional authorities to make their own accounting
requirements known, to simplify financial management of Leader+;
13. Believes that the Commission should establish more detailed timetables, deadlines and procedures,
to be binding on all parties, in order to discourage the defaults and delays caused in large part by lack ofefficiency at the level of the institutional intermediaries, which have often penalised certain rural areas, andshould at the same time ensure that the introduction of innovative and demanding projects for immediateimplementation does not lead to a disproportionately high level of administrative effort on the ground;C 339/54 EN 29.11.2000 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 15 February 2000
assumes that the Commission, in allocating funds for the three main eligible types of measures, will stress
consistency, and not inordinately favour or disadvantage anyone; calls in this connection for the selectioncriteria for individual pilot projects to be drafted clearly and without ambiguity;
14. Recommends maintaining the flexibility and adaptability brought in by Leader II and permitting
changes to the Leader+ action plans during their implementation;
15. Calls on the Commission to submit to Parliament as soon as possible an evaluation report on Lea-
der II and also to inform it of any conclusions and implications relevant to the Leader+ programme, whichwill also be useful for special Community programmes, particularly in order to take advantage in thefuture of the experience obtained and to help projects which have been concluded successfully underLeader as a whole develop into specialised EU programmes;
16. Notes that, since the conclusion of Agenda 2000, the common agricultural policy has been playing
an ever greater part in the sustainable development of the countryside in a broader context, and that ittherefore seems essential for the Community to commit itself to stepping up its financial contribution toinitiatives and networks seeking to promote this new concept; considers, therefore, that the application ofrural development strategies and the use of local resources must be further expanded 5dash sustainably andwith minimum environmental impact 5dash within the EU, and stresses the need for Leader+ to contribute tothe diversification of economic activities in the countryside and adopt a multi-sectorial approach;
17. Recommends that the LAGs should be eligible to receive technical assistance for the devising of
projects and that they should be informed of the best practices and innovative measures achieved throughLeader I and Leader II;
18. Considers that the Commission should assume the tasks intended for the Observatory of Rural
Areas as part of its duties and ensure that the progress of Leader+ is monitored;
19. Suggests that the Commission should compile a Compendium or Guide of successful measures
carried out under Leader I and Leader II;
20. Hopes, within the range of Leader+ executive projects, that there will be positive monitoring of
structural changes in agriculture, that particular attention will be paid to those affected by unemploymentand that commitments will be made to provide job opportunities for young people, while also observingthe principle of equal opportunities for men and women;
21. Calls on the Commission to take into consideration the following proposals for amendments to be
made to its communication:
(a) item 12, third paragraph: ‘Local action groups must consist of a balanced and representative selection
of partners drawn from the different socio-economic sectors in the territory concerned. At the deci-sion-making level not more than 50% of a local partnership may be made up of government officialsof the Member State concerned’,
(b) item 14.1, fourth paragraph: ‘To ensure the local and rural nature of the territories selected, the popu-
lation must not, as a general rule, be more than 100000 in the most densely populated areas (around120 inhabitants/km
2) and in general should not be less than about 10000. However, in densely popu-
lated rural areas or rural areas with low population densities, such as some areas in northern Europe,properly justified exceptions may be provided for’,
(c) item 18: add the words ‘coordination must be enhanced between Leader+ and Community cooper-
ation and partnership programmes such as Interreg (including with the countries of the EuropeanEconomic Area and Switzerland) PHARE, SAPARD or MEDA’,
(d) item 20: ‘The networking of all rural areas, whether or not beneficiaries under the Initiative, and of all
organisations and administrations involved in territorial development, such as the Carrefours (informa-tion centres) will receive support with a view not only to the exchange and transfer of experiences(rest unchanged)’,
(e) item 24, paragraph 3a (new): ‘The Member States may choose operational plans or global grants for
the implementation of these programmes’.29.11.2000 EN C 339/55 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 15 February 2000
(f) item 35:
5dash title: ‘Approval of measures’
5dash first paragraph: ‘The Commission will approve the Leader+ Community Initiative programmes as
quickly as possible, and at any rate within no more than five months of receipt of the applicationfor assistance and will decide on the Community contribution in accordance with Article 28 ofthe General Regulation’,
5dash paragraph 2: ‘Only in the case where the Member State chooses the operational plan procedure,
three months after (remainder unchanged)’;
22. Stresses that the guidelines in Leader+ must now be adopted as quickly as possible, so that local
action groups in the Member States can draw up their projects and submit them in good time for approvalto the Commission, to ensure that there is a sufficient take-up of the funds made available in the budgetbefore the end of 2000;
23. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission and the parlia-
ments of the Member States.C 339/56 EN 29.11.2000 Official Journal of the European Communities
Tuesday 15 February 2000