ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(80)685
Vol.1980/0218

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement (CEE,Euratom) n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernant l'ouverture aupublicdesarchiveshistoriques delaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement (CE,Euratom) n°1700/2003 du22septembre 2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003, p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation (EEC,Euratom) No354/83of1February 1983
concerning theopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropean Economic
Community andtheEuropean AtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983, p.1),as
amended byRegulation (EC,Euratom) No1700/2003 of22September 2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003, p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary, classifieddocuments inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformity withArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung (EWG,Euratom) Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar 1983überdieFreigabe derhistorischen Archive derEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom) Nr.1700/2003 vom22.September 2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003, S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit
erforderlich, wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenannten Verordnung freigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COM(80)685 final
Brussels ,14th November 1980
• ' !
•? '
- < i .
i:
* \ '
NINTH .FINANCIAL REPORT
onthe
EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL GUIDANCE AND GUARANTEE FUND
YEAR 1979 -
GUARANTEE SECTION
and . • ;
food aid financing
V* ^
■
-iYX^
C0M(80 )685final

IMIBQBUÊIQSÏ-NQII ;
i •
Article 10.ofRegulation (EEC )No.729/70onthe financing ofthe common
agricultural policy requires theCommission tosubmit totheCouncil and
totheEuropean Parliament before 1July each year ,"afinancial report
ontheadministration ofthe Fund during thepreceding financial year and,
ihparticular ,onthestate ofitsresources andthenature ofitsexpendi -*
ture andtheconditions under which Community financing hasbeen effected ".
This report covers the activities ofthe Guarantee Section ofthe EA6GF for
the 1979 financial year ..Theactivities ofthe Guidance Section aredealt
with inaseparate report .
TheGuarantee Section finances expenditure resulting from the common
policy onagricultural markets andprices .Under Articles 2and 3of •
Regulation (EEC )no.729/70,this is (fivided into refunds onexports
tonon-member countries tocover thedifference between Community prices
andworld prices ,andvarious intervention measures designed tostabilize
agricultural markets (storage ,withdrawal from themarket ,price compensation
guidance premiums ).This report covers the activities ofthe
the 1979 financial year ..Theactivities
with inaseparate report .
N.B. This draft oftheReport wascompleted on26September 1980 .

-II-VI/169/8Û-EN
SUMMARY OFTHE NINTH FINANCIAL REPORT
EAGGF ~GUARANTEE SECTION
Title I-Community financing ofmarkets
1 .. . . . '
1.Expenditure totalled 10441 mEUA ,which represents anincrease of
1768 mEUA or204 compared with 1978 .
This sharp increase ismainly the result ofthe surplus inthe milk
and milk products sector and the measures adopted toencourage the
sale ofbutter and skimmed-mi Ikpowder (+513 mEUA);thedecline in
the markets for meat (+211 mEUA);the world situation asregards
cereals ,rice ,oilseeds and sugar (+609 mEUA);and the financial
effects ofthe increased support forMediterranean products implemented
in1978 ,inparticular forfruit andvegetables (+342 mEUA)andolive
oil (+215 mEUA).Forother products the increase isless marked ,and
expenditure onmonetary compensatory amounts actually fell by172 mEUA .
Ί
Asthe initial appropriations were insufficient ,asupplementary budget
of802 mEUAwas required tocover thedeficit ,not counting 203 mEUA
for milk products spent intheMember States ,which will becovered
bythe 1980 budget . ]
2.Expenditure onrefunds increased more markedly than that onintervention
rising to47.7% oftotal expenditure .The value ofproducts ininter­
vention storage amounts to2000 mEUA,but stocks ofmilk powder have
decreased while those ofwheat have increased .
Thegross cost andthe net cost ,i.e. less agricultural levies (8297 mEUA )
increased to0.60 %and0,48 %oftheCommunity 'sgross domestic product
'respectively ,ascompared with 0.56% and 0.41% in1978 .-
1
mEUA =million European units ofaccount .

VI/169/80-EN
■, ! '-III-
TitleII-Cashposition andfinancial administration
3.TheCommission wasnolonqerabletomeetthecostoffinancing the„
payingagencies byNovember 1979,asthesupplementary budgetproposed
.inSeptember wasnotadopteduntilDecember .Thisledtotemporary
difficulties insomedepartments ,.
4.Thisexceptional situation makesitimpossible *togivethecustomary
assessment ofthecashposition intheMemberStatesortransfers
ofappropriations /thesehavinglargelybeenincorporated intothedraft
budget.
TitleIII-Enquiries andirregularities
5.TheCommission pursuedseveralspecific enquiries /andcarriedouta
selective checkrelating tomonetary compensatory amounts.ThisLedto
theconclusion thattherewereshortcomings intheareasofinternal
control/andinthetreatment ofdocumentary evidence.Theseshortcomings /
aswellascertaininstances whereCommunity provisions /werecommunicated
totherelevant MemberStatesforcorrective action.
6.Atotalof116casesofirregularities werereported byMemberStatesin.
1979.Theseinvolved 2.1mEUA,ofwhich1.2mEUAwasrecovered .As-
,in1978/thenumberofcasesdetected waslowerthaninpreviousyears.
Mostcasesconcernintervention expenditure onmilkproducts (37cases)/
belf(34cases)/andmonetarycompensatory amounts(18cases).*
■ ·. ' ',/
.'... '·-- ν
TitleIV-Clearance ofaccounts
7.TheCommission adoptedthedecision onclosureoftheaccountsfor1973
on12October1979.Outofatotalof3635mfiUAdeclaredexpenditure ,
about37mEUAwasnotrecognized bytheCommission becauseitrelatedto
.1 i: .
•expenditure whichdidnotconformtoCommunity ,rtules.
... ; '
TheCommission madeinternalarrangements fortheuseofmoreseLect-ive
controlmethodsandforthegroupingoftheworkoftwoyearstogether
sothatthebacklogintheclearance ofaccounts' canbecleared.

VI/169/80-EN
-IV'
The Legal proceedings resulting from the decisions onthe clearance ofthe
accounts .for 1971 and 1972 ended atthe beginning of1979 .The Court
ofJustice inthemain found infavour ofthe Commission ,both asto
questions ofprinciple and insix ofthe seven contentious cases .
Title V-Financing ofCommunity food aid
V
8.Food aid isfinanced inaccordance with rules similar tothose for the
Guarantee Section .TheCommission made monthly advances amounting to
273.4 mEUA,i.e. anincrease of9.2% compared with 1978 .Atotal of
241.1 mEUA went onaidprogrammes for the supply ofmilk products
<161 mEUA )and cereals (80mEUA). Afurther 17.9 mEUA waspaid
t
directly tovarious agencies responsible for food aidoperations .
!
i
(
i
\
*
* *
Inconclusion ,theCommission considers that theEA6GF isanimportant
financial instrument ,theoperation ofwhich should befurther improved
soastolimit expenditure which assuring theproper management of
public funds .

SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION ■ . " Page
■ ■ t
TITLE IrCOMMUNITY FINANCING OFMARKETS
1.Agricultural prices and adjustments tomarket mechanisms
with financial consequences . _ .
1.1.Agricultural prices 2
1.2.Adjustments incertain sectors having financial consequences 2'
2.Analysis ofthe financing ofmarkets
2.1.Comparison ofinitial appropriations and disbursements 9
,2.2.Breakdown ofexpenditure bytype 16
2.3.Public stocks 17
2.4.Corrections tobemade tothe breakdown ofexpenditure
byMember States onthe basis ofmonetary compensatory
amounts (MCAs ) \ 18
2.5.Assessment ofthetotal cost ofthe Guarantee Section 19
,• • ' ; >
3. •Changes inrules governing' the EAGGF Guarantee Section
3.1.Council legislation 21
3.2.Commission legislation 21
. , TITLE II:CASH POSITION AND FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION
• '
4and 5 General Situation 23
4. The cash position -
4.'1.Advances toMember States ; 25
4.2.Funds available inthe Member States during thefinancial
year ^ •. 27'
4.3.Rate ofutilization ofthe funds available 27
5. -Financial ,administration
5.1.Summary ofavailable appropriations - 29
5.2.Transfer ofappropriations 29
5.3.Expenditure ^ ' -29

-VI-
TITLE III :ENQUIRIES ,IRREGULARITIES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES
6. Enquiries
6.1 .Powers 33
6.2 .Investigations andselective checks undertaken 33
7. Irregular ities .
7.1 .The system ofcooperation andprompt notification 34
7.2 .Irregularities detected 35
7.3 .Recovery ofamounts inconnection with legal
proceedings concerning irregularities .37
7.4 .Training ofofficials managing EAGGF expenditure 37
7.5 .The Special Committee Inquiry (SCI ) 38
7.6 .Audit ofoperators commercial documents 38
8. Audit and clearance ofaccounts I 39
8.1 .1973 accounts ,39
8.2 .Accounts for financial years 1974 to1979 41
8.3 ."Consequences ofthejudgements delivered bythe
Ceurt ofJustice 42
TITLE IV :FINANCING OFCOMMUNITY FOOD AID FOR PRODUCTS
SUBJECT TOCOMMON ORGANIZATIONS
9.
9.1 .Characteristics ofCommunity food aid 43
9.2 .The cash position 45
9.3 .Administration ofpayment appropriations 46
9.4 .Appropriations carried forward to1980 48
9.5 .Closure ofthe accounts 48

-VII-
Guarantee Sect ion Page
1. Receipts from theco-responsibility levy onmilk and
allocation ofproceeds amoung various schemes * 3
2.Comparison between theinitia^l appropriations inthe
1979 budget and expenditure 10
3., MCA levels applied intrade .. - 15
4. Corrections tobemade tothe breakdown ofexpenditure ,
•byMember States 19
5. General development ofexpenditure 19
6.Levies under the common agricultural policy 20
7. Funds available toandexpenditure bythe Member §tates for
the 1979 financial year (Guarantee +milk premiums ,100% ) . 26
8. Average percentage rate ofuse ofCommunity funds at
31October 1979 28
9. Transfer ofcredits *\ ' 30
10. Breakdown of1979 expenditure byMember States and by
type offinancing -31
11. Results ofthe clearance ofthe 1973 accounts \ 39
F00D AID
12. Breakdown andutilization ofmonthly advances in1979 • 45
13.Direct' payments \ i 47

-VIII-VI/169/80-EN
I
!
|NI5QDyQIIQ ^ !
( . •'
Lastyearwasacritical onewithregardtoEAGGFguarantee spending onthe
commonagricultural policy,anddevelopments strengthened awareness 'inthe
Community institutions oftheneedtocurbthisgrowthinexpenditure .While
theincrease inexpenditure wasslightly lessthaninprevious years,itwas
nevertheless moremarkedthanhadbeenoriginally anticipated .Inparticular ,
expenditure inthemilksectorcontinued toincrease tothepointwhereit
accounted forabout25%of.theCommunity 'sownresources .Thelackofcontrol
overthecostofthemilkmarketwasonereasonwhythenewEuropean Parliament
rejected thedraft1980Budgetattheendof,1979.
Withregardtothe1979financial year,theprovision ofadditional appropriations
totheEAGGFGuarantee Section underasupplementary budgetprovedanawkward
arrangement .Thissituation ledtotemporary disruptions intheadministration
oftheappropriations and,forashortperiod,inthepayments bythepaying
agencies .
TheCommission believes thateffortstocurbthegrowthinthisexpediture must
becontinued ,bothbyamendments totheregulation onagriculture bythe
Council,andbytheuseofitsownpowersofmanagement .
Theforecasts shouldalsobefurther improved toobviate,asfaraspossible,
theintroduction ofsupplementary budgets.However,completely accurate
estimates cannotbemade,Expenditure toregulate themarketsissubjectto
changes duenotonlytopolicydecisions ,sometimes ofconsiderable importance ,
withregardtopricesandrelatedmeasures,butalso-andtoatleastthe
sameextent-tonatural supplyanddemanddevelopments inthemarkets
themselves (pricesandquantities ),,
Inaddition thereisatimelagbetween anyparticular measure andthe
paymentrelatedtoit.
Itisinthiscontextthat i:hefunctioning oftheEAGGFmustbefurther
improved,particularly withtheaimofproviding fulleraccounting and
economic data,whichshould.be processed morerapidly.TheCommission
wouldtherefore be.betterandmorequicklyswareofthedangerofanoverall

VI/169/80-EN
-IX- / ''
Ψ
orsectorial insufficiency ofappropriations andwould beable totaeany
necessary measures .
TheMember States ,which make theactual payments ,should participate more
actively byproviding fuller better quality data ,which should then be »
processed bytheCommission using modern techniques ,including EDP .
As inprevious years >theclearance ofaccounts hasbeen hampered ,despite
•-^flagging efforts bytheofficials concerned ,byserious administrative
difiTcutt i theimminent threat that thework might come toahalt
altogether .Thejudgments given bytheCourt ofJustice inearly 1979 which
largely endorsed theCommission 'sviews ,followed bytheintroduction bythe
Commission ofmore selective control methods and the systematic
amalgamation ofdata control work ,allowed thedeadlock tobebroken and
astart tobemade oneliminat ing the .back log
TheCommissiwn isgiving particular attention tothevarious investigations
being carried out ,with aview toanin-depth consideration ofhowthe
concept ofirregularities inthe Member States shouldbe interpreted .In
particular ,theapplication ofthe new directive providing for verification
ofcommercial documents infirms isbeing followed closely ..
Itmust also benoted that the strengthening ofthe control bodies -
the Court ofAuditors and the European Parli-ament -has also entailed a
substantial increase inworkload for the departments concerned .

Expenditure bythe
anincrease of20%
9602.1 mEUA,and
Thus ,allowing for
from the clearance
10440.7 mEUA .
Expenditure bythe Guarantee Section depends onalarcve number offactors ,many
ofwhich arestill notknown when thebudget estimates' areproduced .These
include 5
farm price adjustments and various changes totheoperation ofthe common
market organizations ;which were adopted after thebudget andwhich in­
fluenced expenditure during the financial year inquestion ;
economic factors ofagricultural origin (level ofproduction ;prices on
the internal market andontheworld market )orofnon-agricultural origin
(themonetary situation ,delays between operations andpayments bythe
paying agencies ). ,
1. Agricultural prices andadjustments tomarket mechanisms with financial
consequences
Expenditure bytheGuarantee Section was influenced bytheadjustments toth
agricultural prices for the .1979 /80marketing year andthevarious changes
made inthe common market organizations .These were decided oneither
byreference tothe related measures adopted atthe same time asthe
prices ,orduring the 1979 financial year ,and had adirect influence on
themanagement offinancing bythe EAGGF Guarantee Section .VI/169/80-EN
TITLE I
COMMUNITY FINANCING OFMARKETS
EAGGF Guarantee Section in1979totalled 10440.7 mEUA^,
over 1978 .The initial appropriations amounted to
asupplementary budget of802 mEUA had toberequested ,
acarryover of30.4 mEUAfrom 1978 and 6.2 mEUAavailable
ofaccounts ,the total appropriations available came to
Guarantee Section depends onalarcve number offactors ,many
S
not known when the budget estimates areproduced .These
1
mEUA =million European units ofaccount .

VI/169/80-EN
-2-
1.1.Agricultural prices
On22June1979theCounciladopted aseriesofdecisions underan
overallgeneralagreement relating tothefixingoftheagricultural
pricesforthe1979/80marketing year,together withrelatedmeasures
- andmeasures todowiththemonetary situation .
• 4Asregardstheadjustment ofprices,itwasagreedtoincrease them
by1.5%;withtheexception ofthoseformilkproducts .Therelated .
measures mainlyconcernthedairysector (maintaining theco^responsibi lity
levyat0.5'/.,buttersubsidies ,schoolmilk),beefandveal(renewalof-
1calvingpremiums andpremiums fortheslaughter ofcertainfull-grown -
cattle),cereals (thetransfer of200,000 TofcerealstoItaly), ,.
andfruitaridvegetables (aidsforcertainprocessed fruits).
'Intheagri-monetary sectorsomeprogress hasbeenmadetowardsthe
j abolition ofcompensatory amounts,withareduction of1.percentage
j pointforGermany,and1/2percentage pointfortheBeneluxcountries
; (exceptformilkproducts).Inaddition,thegreenratesfortheItalian
\ ■ lira,thepoundsterlingandtheFrenchfrancweredevalued,whichled
toareduction inthelevelsofMCA.
Thepolicy,whichaimstoreduceMCAs,continued therefore in
1979andexpenditure underthisheadingfell,from880mEUAin1978
to708mEUAin1979. V
Thepriceadjustments andtheadoption oftherelatedmeasures additional
involved theEAGGFGuarantee Sectioninadditional expenditure of
approximately'200 mEUAforthe1979financial year.
1.2;Adjustments incertainsectorshavingfinancial consequences .*
Theseincludeadjustments agreedwhenthepriceswerefixedaswell "as
thoseadoptedduringtheyear. !
1.2.1.Milkandmilkproducts , I
Thesituation inthedairymarketstillpresents amajorproblemfor
theCommunity becauseofthedifficulties indisposing ofproduction
andtheresulting highcostsfortheGuarantee Section. -
Themainsurplusproductsareskimmed-mi Ikpowderandbutter.
OnJanuary 1.1979publicstocksofthesetwoproductsamounted *r
toapproximately 722)00and258000tonnesrespectively .

-3-
Attheendof1979thesestockstotalled about215000VI/169/80-EN
and293000tonnes.
TheCommunity'smainconcern wasthustoestablish anequilibrium inthe
dairymarketbycontinuing theexistingpolicyandbyincreasing measures
toencourage anexpansion inthemarket.
(a)Co-responsibility levyandrelated measures
Thismeasure whichisthefinancial contribution ofthemilkproducers to­
wardsachieving anequilibrium inthemarket,wasintroduced byRegulation
(EEC)No.1079/77witheffectfrom1June1978,attherateof0.5%ofthe
targetpriceformilk(214ECU/t)andwasrenewedatthesamelevelforthe
1979/80marketing year.In1979receipts amounted to94.2mEUA.
Thesefundswereusedtofinancemeasures toexpandthemarketasfollows :
Table1-Receipts fromtheco-responsibility levyonmilkandallocation
ofproceeds amongvariousschemes. " mEUA
Mea,sure 1977
(from16.9)1978 1979 16.9.1977to31.12.1979
A.Receipts from
co-responsibility
levy24.0
L_156.1 94-.2 274.3
3.Expenditure
(a)Schoolmilk
(Reg.1080/77) 10.3 30.0 40.3
(b)Butterforthemanu­
facture ofice-cream
(Reg.262/79) 7.5 28.2.25.9 61.6
(c)Concentrated butter
fordirectconsumption
(Reg.649/78)!
II
I
4.7
i■1.5 ! 6.2
(d)Promotion ,advertising
andmarketresearch in
theCommunity
(Reg.723/78)!
!
jS,
V37.4 37.4
I
(e)Marketresearchoutside *'
theCommunity -
(Reg.1993/78)■
10.152.9V-63.0^
I!
>■10.1
(f)Improvement ofthe
qualityofmilk
(Reg.1271/78and723/78)i5.5 )15.5
Expenditure /revenue (%)31lHZ117.2 62.4
b:sss:ss=sss::s :=====s::
1 !
Excluding appropriations earnedoverfromoneyeartothenext.

VI/169/80-EN
-4-
c
Inaddition ,some ofthe measures designed toenlarge the market were increased
in1979,asfollows :
the measures provided for inRegulation (EEC)No.649/78onthe sale ofin­
tervention butter atreduced prices fordirect consumption inthe form
ofconcentrated butter were extended toinclude cream inprivate storage ;
the promotion andadvertising measures were extended upto31March 1980 .
the measures relating tothe sale ofbutter atreduced prices for the
manufacture ofpastry products ,ice-cream andother food stuffs were re­
inforced byRegulation (EEC)No.262/79of12February 1979,which extended
the scope ofsuch sales and granted aid,with effect from 16July 1979 for
but.ter from private storage intended for the manufacture ofthese products
(Regulation (EEC)No.1468/79).
(b)Measures connected with the 1979/80prices '' *7
Inconnection with thedecision onagricultural prices for the 1979/80 c
marketing year,itwas decided :
for milk :.
';°toincrease Community aid inrespect ofthe school miIkprogramme to
100% ofthetarget price with effect from 1September 1979 (additional
cost in1979 :about 10 mEUA);
0toextend until the endofthe 1979/80marketing year the system of
premiums for thenon-marketing ofmilk -andmilk products andthe
*
conversion ofdairy herds tobeef production (cost during the 1979/80
marketing year tothe Guarantee Section ,*which finances 60%:about
210 mEUA);
~forbutter :the Member States are .required toadopt oneofthe
following measures toreduce theprice ofbutter fordirect consumtion :
0togrant aid;75%oftheaidactually granted inanycase not more
than 50EUA/100 kgwill bethelimit ofCommunity financing (cost ;
.over 12months :about 176 mEUA);
tosell offbutter from public orprivate stocks with aCommunity
aidof90EUA/100 kg(cost over 12months :about 225 mEUA).

VI/169/80-EN
(c)Other measures
Since stocks ofskimmed-mi Ikpowder had been falling ,remarkably since
September ,special sales ofthis product for use inpig andpoultry feed were
suspended with effect from 23October 1979 byRegulation (EEC)No»23Q7 /79of
19October •(saving for 1980 :about 465 mEUA).
Inaddition ,Regulation No.2338/79of24October reduced thespecial aid
forliquid skimmed milk for feed for animals other than young calves (saving
over 12months :about 24 mEUA).
Because ofthe imbalance onthe market incertain cheeses ,especially Italian
cheeses ,theexisting private storage aid was extended toinclude long-
keeping cheese ofthe Pecorino romano type taken into storage between
1January and 31March 1979 (Regulation (EEC)No„2948 /78)andforItalian
Eminent aIand Gruyere taken into stock between 7May and 30September 1979
(Regulation (EEC)No.877/79).The cost ofthese measures isabout 8mEUA.
1»2.2. Beef and veal
Inthe beef and veal sector ,calving premiums and premiums for the
slaughter offull-grown cattle were renewed *The rules for the sale
1ofintervention meat were also revised ,inorder toavoid disruption
inthe market andtoensure equal access toproducts and equal treat­
ment ofpurchases ,particularly inthe case ofsales atstandard pric
fixed inadvance .
With this inmind ,the procedures for the sale ofintervention beef
%
atreduced prices tocertain welfare institutions and bodies were
amended byRegulation (EEC)No.2374 /79of26October 1979 .
However ,despite considerable sales inthis sector ,intervention
stocks ofbeef atthe endof1979 were ataslighty higher level
than atthe end of1978 = ,
11
1
Regulation No.216/69onthis question was repealed 'and replaced by
Regulation No*2173/79,which came into force on 1November 1979c

-6- | VI/169/80-EN ■
l
f . '< S '
] '
f -
k \ .
' . î.I • '. ' .
1.2.3 .Pigmeat '
There were abundant supplies ofpigmeat i;ntheCommunity in1979
,andtemporary measures were adopted toregulate themarket .
Special conditions relating tothegrant ofaidforprivate storage
were applied from 29January 1979 byRegulation (EEC )No.142/79
together with measures toagain protect theCommunity market with
regard to'imports from third countries .
1.2.4 .Oilsand fats -
(a)Olive Oil
Thenew system ofaid forolive oil/introduced when .thebasic
regulation onthecommon organization oftheolive oiImarket was
revised ^entered into force atthebeginning ofthe1979 /80market­
ingyear .For1themembers ofaproducers' organization theaid
toproduction remains based onthequantity actually produced .
Fornon-members ,itisreplaced byastandard aid which is
mainly based ontheproduction potential .Payments tothis
category ofproducer can thus bemade more rapidly than inthe
past . • •
( ' ' - ...
Asregards aid forconsumption ,theadoption ofthe relevant <rules
(Council Regulation (EEC )No.3089 /78andCommission Regulation (EEC )
No.557/79wasdelayed .The system ofaid forconsumption did not
therefore become operational unti I1Apri I1979 . .
On9August 1979 ,theCouncil adopted Regulation (EEC )No.1794 /79
amending Regulation (EEC)No.154/75.This provides for adeduc­
tion of1.47% oftheproduction aidforthe1979 /80marketing yedr ,
inaddition tothedeductions already made forpreceding years for
the ,financing oftheregister ofolive cultivation .Theregulation
also stipulates that ifthese deductions donot cover all the
expenditure involved inestablishing this .register,' other -deductions
will bedecided upon .After atrial period ,therefore ,andfinali -.
zation ofthemethod forestablishing theregister ,work canactually
commence .
1See8thFinancial Report ,paragraph 1.2.A.

VI/169/8Q-EN
-7-
(b)OiIseeds -
Toencourage the development ofcastor seed production andtohelp
growers tocope with thetechnical difficulties inherent inestablishing
this crop inthe Community ,anaidtosupplement theexisting aid was
introduced onatemporary basis byRegulation (EEC)No.1610/79of
24July 1979 .Itisapplicable from the beginning ofthe 1979/80marketing
year until the endofth& 1981/82marketing year *Thetotal cost ofthis
sector inthe 1979/80marketing year isabout 0.2 mEUA.
Asthe Community 'spolicy istodevelop the production ofsoya beans ,
the system ofaid based onanindicative yield provided for in
Regulation (EEC)No.1900/74was replaced byasystem based onthe
actual production ofsoya beans applicable from the 1980/81marketing
year under Regulation (EEC)No.1614/79of24-July 1979 .
2.5. Wine sector , '
(a)The body ofCommunity legislation onthe wine sector ,consi sted of
alarge number oftexts ,too many for easy use.Thelegislation was
therefore consolidated byRegulation (EEC)No.337/79of5February
1979 .
1
(b)Forthe 1978/79marketing year the harvest required thegrant of
eid inrespect ofconcentrated grape must beproduced inthe Community
and used toincrease thealcoholic .strength ofwine (Regulation (EEC)
No.130/79of25January 1979)(cost over twelve months :about
9m EUA).
(c)Inview ofthe amounts ofwine stilt ipstorage bythe
middle of1979,aidforthe re-storage of'table wine was re~<int roduced
on3August 19 ,'9byRegulation -(EEC)No.1714/79for wine for which
astorage contract had been concluded during the 1978/79marketing
year (cost over twelve -months :about 2mEUA).,
(d Thevery substantial crop 'in1979/80"compelled tho Community ,in
September /October ,toallow the .conclusion ofshort-term private storage
contracts fortable wines ,grape must andconcentrated grspe must ,,
..,OnDecember 14,operators were also authorized toconclude similar long-
term contracts .Thetotal cost ofthese measures was' about 23 mEUA
for 1979 .

' VI/169/80-EN
-8-
•6. Other sectors • ■ "
(a) Cereals
■- i
Under Regulation (EEC)No.946/79,carry over payments were granted
forcommon' wheat ,ryeandmaize instock attheendofthe1978 /79
marketing year .Asaresult ofthedifference between theintervention
price when themonthly increases inthis price ended ,andthe
intervention price atthebeginning ofthe1979 /80marketing year ,
action hadtobetaken intheform ofthese payments ,toprevent too
large aquantity ofcereals being presented forintervention instead
ofbeing sold normally onthemarket before thebeginning ofthenew
marketing year . ./
InJune theCouncil also decided totransfer toItaly 200000tonnes of
bread wheat from intervention stocks . •
(b) Fruit and vegetables - •
Thebasic regulation onthis sector was'amended on19February to
permit preventive withdrawals ofapples and pears byproducer organizations
.-i .
Asregards processed fruit andvegetables ,the list ofproducts eligible
forproduction aid wasexpanded toinclude certain other processed
products such asWilliams pears insyrup ,cherries insyrup ,andproducts
processed from tomatoes .Aid for these first twoproducts isrestricted
toaquantity notexceeding 105% ofthequantity produced in1978 (cost
over twelve months :about 35mEUA). -T.
.Cc)Sugar'and isoglucose -
Regulation (EEC )No.1111 /77laying down common provisions foriso- *
glucose wasamended byRegulation (EEC )No.1243 /79totake account
ofajudgment oftheCourt of .Justice .Asystem ofproduction
quotas andexport refunds similar tothat inforce inthe sugar _
sector therefore now applies toisoglucose .

ν
VI/169/80-EN
-9-
2.Analysis ofthe financing ofmarkets
2.1.Comparison ofinitial acoropriat ions and disbursements ■
Table 2compares initial budget appropriations <9602.1 mEUA)with
expenditure effected bythe endofthefinancial year,after adjustment ofthe
funds available byacarryover of30.4 mEUA from 1978 ;asupplementary
budget of802 mEUA,and anadditional 6.1 mEUAavailable following arect­
ification ofdecisions onthe clearance ofthe accounts (see paragraph 5.3.2.(b )).
2.1.1 .TheAgricultural sectors <1)
Thefollowing observations can bemade after detailed examination ofthe'
individual sectors :
(a)CereaLs
The 1979 harvest showed a5.4% decline onthe good production cfth?1978 harvest ,
mainly duetolower yields .The abundant 1978 harvest ledtoanincrease in
expenditure onthis sector in1979 (1563.7 mEUA)compared with 1978 (1112.5 m i
EUA),mainly duetoexports ,which involved heavy expenditure onrefunds
(1184.7 mEUA ascompared with 831.9 mEUA in1978).
Nonetheless ,compared with theinitial appropriations for 1979,this expenditure
onrefunds was 255 mEUA less than the estimate ;world prices infact
increased substantially atthe beginning of1979,leading toadecrease inthe
level ofthe refund .Intervention expenditure (379 mcUA)was 56less than
forecast .This difference isdue mainly tothe fact that expenoiture oncarry­
over payments was considerably less than anticipated ,because ofthe 1.5% price
increase for 1979 /80which was then underlined byincreases atthenational
level following therepresentative rates ,and because special measures
(private storage )were notemployed . {
(b)Milk and milk products sector
Expenditure amounted to4527*5 mEUA,Itexceeded the -estimates by809.9 mEUA
and 1978 expenditure by512.8 mEUA.
This situation isthedirect consequence ofanincrease inproduction
for which there are notsufficient outlets atmarket prices .Costly disposal
measures both within and outside the Community aretherefore necessary .
Asregards skimmed-ni Lkpowder 'for which there isapermanent surplus ,the
continuing existence ofvery large quantities inpublic storage isexpensive
(110 EUA/t/year )instorage andinterest costs and leaves the problem of
final disposal unsolved . •
(1)For acomparison ofexpenditure with previous years ,seeAnnex 2.

V:■ table z -■
'CfMDirUon bftw*' ^th* approor iafion*-Inth*1979 hurfo*t *ndeaoenditure
»EUA
i ; . . .Initial' "
appropria ;îo.iJ
1979i " v" , •Ε·η*rvlitwr *in1979 |Differences between ! ■
Tot»l ,.'efv!hich _ ^ * ,|apprvpsar.deKpînduurt 1979 ..
:'!: •'' ••v !.00 !!Refunds .IFirst Cat.intery .I?n«jcat.interv . mEUA
I r ôtô ■
» ..., 'b~–n .d– « ! 1 J 9 :__JL. J> I\alnoSA '
CEREALS \..excluding durum wheat .*
-durum wheat1.874,2 •
,1.747,8
126,41.563,7
1.448,3
, :15,0
13,9
1,1lil84,7 -
,• 1.184,7
--290,1
.s-,\174,7
115,4''88,9 .
•88,9
<• V-310,5
-299,5
-11,0-16,6
"17,1
-8,7
RICE . . ~ • .■41,4 .V <2,9 V;:M • 1 ! ~1'2 '♦ ,1,5 •- ♦3,6 .::
IMLK AND(1ILKPRODUCTS ., '3.717,6 ■ 4.527,5[2.087,9 : 1.682,0 ''757,6 ♦809,9 I.*21.8 ■.'
OILS AND fATS
-olive oil
-oil »cedj .1 :522,9
321,7
201,2606,0
388,2
217,85,8
3.8
.2,01,2
1,2*581,9
365,6
Λ216,322/9
22,6
0,3♦83,1
♦'66,5
♦16,6♦15,9
♦20,7
♦.8,3
J.SUGAR -1 ■ *v1.004,6 . I«9,a 9,0 885,1" I 254,7 ■é4'8'" .6'5, ■
tBEEf AND VEAL . ..488,3 .'/,, •748,2 V"'.:-"■;270,2 - .,-100,2 " ;1 377,8 ^ ♦259,9 ' '♦53,2 I
f • • ■ ■ ■: •.■-■, •
1PIGMEAT ..,.. .104,9I. - '^' ji'°V'-78,4 1 26,5' .♦.20,0 |w23.6 -i
I « ,' 'I
IEGGS ANO POULTRY . ,' • . j«1.2' !79,5 10,1 ' 79,5 ♦38,3 :,I
Irî1l ''
Ifruit akovegetables *,.. I326,5 .; !<42,9 ' 4.2 ■'*.5/\> : 408,4 ..'... ♦116,4 ; '♦35,7 •■y .
IwlMC ,• •Vr  m'4' - I61,9"• 0,1-■ v k57'3' -48,2
IT08ACC0 262,0 V 225,5 ' 2.2 : *iV ; |'209,3 ••12/5' ■-36,5 -13,9 ;
1jhshéry raoDucTS .20,0 17,0 '''' 8,5 '8'5 '■' -,3,0j"1S'°
IflAX/H£W ' ■ j17,5 ■■'.v v 17,7 - . 17,7 •" ♦0>2 '
seeds .. ., :• . 27,2 V" 30,1 v ■•I Ji ■ ■'î0'1, ♦.v2,9..'; ■■;•♦10,7 •r. 1 v ■'
1
JHOPS . { ■ j11,0 :10,1 -. io,i ',; ;o,® '8'2I
CÉHrer.ATED fODDER \" "
Pitiendtield btanj:,49,3' '
6,3,46,6...
15,Î0,1■ 46.6 •
..15,Î.- 2,7
♦5,0--5,5 ....
"+142,9 '
j«OM-AfiME *HPRODUCTS |176,2 •252,2 ■- '0,2 *I•252,2 * I ♦76.0 , '♦43.1 .'
JKOWETARr COMPENSATORY AH.OlWTS ' 809,2 j708.4 ,0,7 249,6 V <58,8 . -100.8 .r12.5 j
V-
JTOTAL , 9.60^1 ÎO.UO ,? .,
100 4.981.8 ' jI"4.199.2 •' j1.259.7 ♦838,6 ' v8-7 !
\ : ".\ -
'O/O .\100 ',.."•
h.i?'7 ■^'■.40,2 12,1■ 1 ■' ''
't'i5' ''• 1• , ■....... ./ •
Appropriaitons entered inOJNo.I23 .• ,•
of31January 1979, !.y'-••" •.• *....

-11-
VI/169 /8Q-EN
Final disposal cannot beachieved without heavy aidpayments orrefunds .
Inview ofthis ,andsince thesituation ontheworld market enabled large
quantities tobeexported without increasing therefund ,efforts topromote
both disposal ontheinternal market (large amounts ofaidfortheuseof
skimmed -milk powder inpigandpoultry feed )andexports continued until the
level ofpublic stocks reached amore reasonable level (about 200000 t)
towards theendof1979 .Since then these aids have been discontinued .The
sales thus achieved arereflected inexpenditure :commercial refunds totalled
1822.7 roEUA (about 42%forbutter ,19%forskimmed-milk powder and39%for
other milk products ),542mEUAmore than theinitial estimates .Intervention
expenditure onskimmed milk (1671.3 mEUA)also exceeded theestimates ,by
'117 mEUA.Infact these disposal measures meant that expenditure onaids aimed
atpromoting sales exceeded theestimates .Ontheother hand ,thereduction of
public stocks ledtoareduction inthis expenditure .
Forbutter ,intervention expenditure (630.5 mEUA )was 160 mEUAmore than .
thebudget estimate .-Steadily increasing production while consumption
remained stable meant that special disposal measures hadtobeimplemented in
respect oflarger quantities than hadbeen foreseen .Even so,stocks still
rose from 253000tonnes atthebeginning of1979 to293000tonnes bythe
<•end ofthe year . . ' '
Asregards the other measures /incontrast with the situation inprevious
financial years ,expenditure onthe distribution ofschool milk and onthe
Guarantee part ofthepremiums for thenon-marketing ofmilk and forthe
conversion ofdairy herds was close totheestimates .Receipts from the
,co-responsibility levy were also largely asestimated ,although extension
ofthis measure beyond the 1978 /79marketing year could notbeanticipated
when the budget wasprepared ,andreceipts were thus' siight lyhigher than the .
estimates .Themeasures toexpand themarket whichwere introduced in1978 ,
affected expenditure markedly in1979 ,asshown inTable 1.

"VI/169/80-EN
-12-
' ' » • ' -
(c)Intheoils andfats secto rthe changes made intherules onthegrant
ofproduction aidforolive oil/thepossibility ofadvance aidpay­
ments ,andtheintroduction ofconsumption aid,resulted inactual
expenditure (388.2 mEUA)exceeding theinitial appropriations by
-66.5mEUA. ■* ,,,
Expenditure onintervention purchasing and onsubsequent operations totalled
22.9 mEUA,asagainst theestimated 17.2 mEUA.Large quantities of
olive oil held bytheintervention agencies were sold;"whereas stocks
totalled 105 000 tonnes for 1978 ,this figure had dropped to53000 tonnes ,
bythe endof1979 .Expendi ture .onaidfor theproduction ofcolza seed
substantially exceeded theestimates (29 mEUA)because ofthefall in
.world prices ,which ledtoanincrease inaid in1979 . ■>>
(d) Sugar sector .Theoverall ,surplus ,including imports of1.3million tfrom
; the ACP ,countries ,remained unchanged in1979 . 1Expenditure onthis
sector amounted to939.8 mEUAfor 1979 (1978 :878 nTEUA ). ,
This situat ionnecessitated massive exports ,involving expenditure of
635.1 m-EUA,i.e. 73% oftotal expenditure onthis sector .Increases
intheworld price ,particularly during the second half of1979,allowed
refunds tobereduced ,and expenditure onrefunds totalled 65 mEUA less
than estimated .Itshould benoted ,however ,that receipts from production
and storage levies have '.increased inrecent years (133 mEUA in"1976,
<+65 mEUA in1979),asshown inTables No.6onpage 20,asthe quant ities *
produced and storage costs have themselves increased . v\
(e) Beef and "veal .The market situation did not improve ,andtotal expenditure
inthis sector (748.2m EUA)far exceeded both the estimates (488.3 mEUA )
and 1978 expenditure (638.7 mEUA).
Given thelevels ofsupply ,(production plus imports ,themajority at
preferential tariff rates )and consumption ,anactive export policy
,-r<isrequired .Theresulting expenditure onrefunds (270.2 mEUA)t
substantially exceeded theestimates (122.7 mEUA). The massive intervention
buying-in also meant that the expected reduction inpublic stocks did not
materialize and expenditure onthis item (377.8 mEUA)exceeded estimates
by ,119.1 mEUA.Ontheother hand,other intervention expenditure ,i.e. on
orderly marketing premiums and calving premiums ,wasslightly less than
estimated .

-13- VI/169/80-EN
I
Inthe pigmeat sector ,inwhich the market had been relatively stable
inprevious years andexpenditure had been lower than estimated ,the
increase inproduction and thus supply brought prices down ."This
meant that exports had tobestepped upandthat more use was made ofthe
private storage aid measures .Expenditure (104.9 mEUA)thus exceeded
estimates by20 mEUA.Increased expenditure inthis field isalso atleast
partly due tothe fact that asimports ofsubstitute feedstuff products
(manioc ,maize starch residues )have steadily increased ,production
has adapted more slowly tothe demand .
Inthe eggs and poultrymeat sector the increase inexports caused
expenditure toexceed the estimates by38.3 mEUA.
Asregards fruit and vegetables ,expenditure onmarket measures (refunds and
intervention )was asestimated inthe budget .Ontheother hand,expendi­
ture onprocessing premiums (282.3 mEUA)was 122.2 mEUA more than
estimated .This isanew measure ,and thequantities uhich qualified far
exceeded the estimates based onavailable production data .
In,the wine sector ,the recent harvests had been relatively small ;there has
therefore been noneed toapply the measures introduced tocope with sur­
pluses ;Expenditure (61.9 tnEUA)was thus less than the appropriat ions,
which were already considerably less than for theprevious year .
However ,the 1979 harvest wasexceptionally heavy (170million hi,compared
with 140million in1978),andspecial measures hadtobeadopted from the
endof1979..Theeffect oftheresulting expenditure will befelt in1980 .

, -14- 1 VI/169/80-EN
î" * ". • .
CJ) Raw tobacco ;expenditure .onmarketing premiums was asestimated .
Disposal oforiental varieties isstill hampered by :serious difficulties and,
•despite -the improvements resulting from the programme for conversion to
different varieties ,large quantities ofintervention purchases were made .
■Expenditure onthis item was/however ,less than expected .-The -reason for
this isthat thedifference between thebuying-in price andth$selling price
isshown inexpenditure atthe time when the tobacc<j leaves intervention ;
infact,in1979 withdrawls from intervention were less than expected and .
stocks increased from 21600 tatthe end of1978 to28000 tatthe end
.of1979 . • •
(k) For theother sectors expenditure was approximately equivalent to
appropriations .However ,anaid toencourage the useofpeas andfield
- - . \
beans for animal feed was introduced on 1July 1978 ;;expenditure <15.3 mEUA )
therefore exceeded estimates by9mEUA.The estimates hadofcourse
been -based onproduction data obtained before the introduction ofthe aid i
' 'measure . , •'. \ .
As .regards export refunds onprocessed products ofagricultural ,origin
(non-Annex IIproducts ),expenditure for 1979 confirmed thetrend of
-previous years -,i.e. anannual increase . * \
2.1.2 .Monetary compensatory amounts (MCAs ) :
Table 3shows thedifference between the hypotheses used inpreparing
the burlret and the range ofMCAs actually applied .Generally speaking ,-
-- . I
the exchange rates of-the Community currencies were more stable in
1979 than inprevious years .In1979,there was also afaster -
dismantling ofnegative MCAs,while sterling also improved .!Itwas due
•• ' ,
tothese two factors inparticular that expenditure (708.4 mEUA)was
100.8 mEUA less than forecast . -

-15-VI/169/80-EN
Table 3-MCA Levels applied intrade
CURRENCY Rates referred tointhe Budget
(22.5.1978 )Rates recorded in1979
Minimum Maximum
|DM +7.2 + 9.8 +10.8 I
BFR/LFR +1.4 + 1.9 + 3.3
HFL +1.4 . + 1.9 + 3.3
FF . -10.2 0 10.6
LIT -11-2 -'2.3 - 17.7
|UKL -27.9 0 28.2
IRL -2.8 0 - 3.0r0 0°J
2.1.3 . The effect ofthe dual conversion rate
Until 1977 budget appropriations were expressed inu.a.and the
relationships between theunit ofaccount and the national currencies
\ were based ontheparities unchanged since 1971,declared tothe
International Monetary Fund .Agricultural operations ,however ,
» •gradual ty;moved away from this system and nearer tothe market ",rates
• onthe basis ofthe Council Decisions fixing representative rates for
v:/ the conversion into national currencies ofaids,refunds ,etc.
determined inu.a.The dual conversion rate effect therefore became
increasingly important andforthis reason aspecial budget heading
was included tocover this variation in1977 and 1978 .
Since then ,
the EUA has been introduced into the budget ,and
the ECU with adjustments tothe representative rates has been
introduced inagriculture .
Since ,inprinciple ,the ECU and the EUA are atpresent identical ,
the dual rate effect has taken onanentirely different complexion
and cannot becompared with theearlier situation .Itnow
represents only thedifference between the representative rate and
the EUArate used forcalculating budget appropriations where the
two rates are not the same .For some currencies this difference
ispositive ,forothers negative ,butforthe .Community asawhole
theeffect ofthe dual rate isfar less than itwas inthe past .

\diî1v,o
£5insalignm ?,tcfr«pr«ser.ta' ivepates hsialso -continued.# t'ne
dual rate effect noLonger neeo 'stobeentered separately inthe
budget .From the1979 budget onwards ,therefore ,this effect where
itstill occurs isshown under -thebudget headings relating tothe
different measures ,aswasthecase before 1-977 . ;
Thetransition from theu.a .(IMF)tothe EUAandtheseparate entry
ofthedual rate effect ,followed byitscancellation in1979 ,make it
somewhat difficult tokeep track ofchanges inexpenditure .This is
whythetable inAnnex 2onthedevelopment ofexpenditure bytheEAGGF
Guarantee Section gives allthefigures inEUA,thedual rate effect -,
having been recalculated with regard toexpenditure oneach individual
sector andincluded with theagricultural expenditure foreach sector .
2.2 . .Breakdown ofexpenditure bytype . .
Thefollowing conclusions can bedrawn from thetable inAnnex 3:
(a)refunds -
. ••.♦ , ■
Thereinforcement inrecent years ofCommunity policy onagricultural ,
exports led in1979 togreater efforts topromote thedisposal of t
produce inseveral sectors and ther-efore toanincrease inexpenditure -
onrefunds ,particularly forcereals ,rice ,beef andveal ,pigmeat
(period ofabundant supply )andeggs andpoultry .Asin1978 ,dairy
products sector accounts formore than anyother product (44%of
expenditure );however ,efforts todispose ofproduction we'renot in
vain .since skimmed-mi Ikpowder have been reduced considerably while
those ofbutter have remained stable .
This expenditure hasincreased slightly asapercentage oftotal »
agricultural expenditure (48.6% ascompared with 45.5% in1978 ).
(b)intervention measures . ,
Themajor part ofexpenditure consists ofprice support measures forthe
internal market .NAbout 31% in1978 ,these accounted forabout 34%of
agricultural expenditure in1979 astherate ofpayments ofaidfor
theproduction ofolive oil speeded uparid large amounts ofaidwere
granted fortheprocessing ofmilk products and fruit andvegetables
(see Annex 6).-

Asregards expenditure onsecond category intervention ,related to
thepurchase ,storage anddisposal ofintervention products ,
.Annex 4divides this into ^:
-technical costs relating tophysical storage operations ;
-expenditure connected with theinterest costs onfunds required
forbuying-in ;
-expenditure resulting from thedifference between thebuying-in •
price and the receipts from sales .
The high figure forthis last type ofexpenditure can beexplained in
the dairy and beef sectors bythefact that thedifference between
thebuying-in price and the receipts from sales isquite large .In
these sectors ,asaresult ofthe special measures for thedisposal
ofintervention stocks which were designed toincrease the consumption
ofcertain products .
Cc) Expenditure onmonetary compensatory amounts (MCAs )totalled
708.4 million EUA in1979,asignificant decrease over previous
years (14.5% oftotal Guarantee Section expenditure in1977,10.2%
in1978 and 6.8% in1979). This reduction isattributable not only
toefforts made in1979 toadapt to'the monetary situation (seepoint 1.1).
but also tothe introduction ofthe European Monetary System ,which
has helped tostabilize exchange rates between Community currencies .
Public stocks
Asshown inAnnex 5,atthe end of1979 public stocks had decreased
compared with the endof1978 for skimmed-milk powder (214 859tasagainst
721 827t),olive oil (53401tasagainst 104 895t),preserved beef
andbarley .They had increased onthe ,other hand ,for common wheat
(1.9million tascompared with 1.1million t)co-lza seed <10236 as
compared with 820t),butter ,and beef carcases .
Thetotal value ofstocks ,calculated onthe basis ofthecapital
immobilized ,had decreased slightly (2143 mEUA asagainst 2310 mEUA).
7thFinancial Report ,paragraph 3.3,p.22.

VI/169 /dO-EN
-18-
2.4 . Corrections tobemade tothebreakdown ofexpenditure byMemb?r State on
the basis ofmonetary compensatory amounts (MCAs ).
The basic Regulation onMCAs Lays down that aMember State must operate
,MCAs onintra-Commuriity trade ,depending onthestate ofdepreciation
orappreciation ofitscurrency .However ,the Council agreed inApril
1976 ,,onthebasis ofArticle 2aofRegulation (EEC )No*974/71,
that theMCAs payable intrade with theUnited kingdom andItaly would
, bepaid bytheexporting country ,asopposed totheimporting country .
This Agreement has since been renewed .
Article 3ofRegulation (EEC )No.1172 /76of17May 1976 which set
upafinancing faci lity stipulates that for the /purposes ofestablishing
netbalances forMember States ,themonetary compensatory amounts are to
beattributed tothe country which hasmade them necessary through changes
intheexchange rates for itscurrency .
Thefollowing table shows these corrections . -"

'A VI/169/80-EN
-19-
TableNo.4
Corrections tobemade tothe breakdown ofexpenditure byMember States
mEUA
Member State Expenditure
not correctedCorrections Corrected expenditure
Amount %1979 %1978
Belgium 785.9 33.3 752.6 7.2j 6.5
Denmark j 757.4 128.2 629.2 6.0 6.6
Germany 2.490.3 - 143.8 2346.5 22.5 26.7
France 2478.3 197.1 2281.2 21.8 16.7
Ireland 572.9 ■ 116.9 456.0 4.4 3.9
Italy 1320.1 + ■336.4 1656.5 "15.9 13.4
Luxembourg 13,5 - 0.2 13.3 0.1 0.3
Netherlands | 1494.4 117.4 1377.0 13.2 | 12.6
United Kingdom ;
j527.9 + 400.5 928.4 8.9 13.3
t I
TOTAL EEC 10440.7 0 10440.7 100 100
2.5.Assessment ofthetotal cost ofthe Guarantee Section
2.5.1.General develooment ofexoenditure
Table 5
Total expenditure ,Guarantee
Section
mEUA%increase from one year to
the nexti
t
t
1975 4522.5 j
1976 • 5587.1 - 23.5
1977 6830.4 22.3
1978 8672.7 27.0
1979 10440.7 20.4
TOTAL ! 36053.4 Average 23%
i
Theabove table shows theincrease inexpenditure since 1975,averaging 23%peryear .
Inthelight oftheTable inAnnex 2onthedevelopment ofexpenditure bysector ,this
increase isduemainly tothecosts ofthecereals anddairy products sectors (notably
fordisposal ofsurpluses ),totheincrease insupport forMediterranean products
decided onin1978,andtotheheavy expenditure onmonetary compensatory amounts upto
1978 .

VI/169/80-EN
-20-
2.5.2 .Agricultural levies
The common agricultural policy ,aswell asgenerating expenditure ,also
constitutes asource ofrevenue for*the Community budget inthe form
ofagricultural levies and sugar production levies ,which in1979
brought in2143.5 mEUA. _ -
Table 6
Levies under the common agricultural
policy
mEUA
Type ofagricultural
levy 1975 ' 1976 f 1977 1978 1979
Iirport levies "
Sugar Production levy/534.0
06.01040.1
133.21816.9
320.8 "1872.7
410.61678.6
.464.9 -
TOTAL 620.0 1173.3 2137.7 2283.3 2143.5
The increase inagricultural levies in1977and 1978 lost momentum in
1979 because ofthe upward movement inworld prices forcertain products ,
especially wheat ,production ofwhich fell-well short -oftheexceptional
harvests of1978 while demand wasstrengthened byvery heavy purchases
-made bytheSoviet Union after apoor harvest inthat country .
Thequantities ofthe main cereals (common wheat ,maize andbarley ).
imported into the Community have been declining since .1976,andthis is
'especially true for maize andbarley . | -
Asregards the sugar levies .Annex 8shows therelationship between the
levies charged andtherefunds granted forstorage costs for each
sugar marketing year since 1968/69.Itshould beemphasized that the
common organization ofthemarket insugar aims toestablish abalance ,
onmulti-annual basis ,between production levies' andthe reimbursement
ofstorage costs .
<

_21_ - VI/169/80-EN
2.5.3.Costinrelation toGDP
Acomparison onEAGGFGuarantee Sectiontotalexpenditure in1979:
withthemostsignificant indicator ofthegeneralperformance of
theeconomy,theCommunity grossdomestic productatmarketprices
(GDP)showsthatGuarantee Sectionexpenditure increased atafaster
ratethantheeconomies intheMemberStatesgenerally (seeAnnex7).
Grossexpenditure andnetexpenditure ,afterdeduction ofagricultural
levies{8297mEUA),increased in1979to0.60%and0.48%ofGDP
respectively ascompared with0.56%and0.41%in1978.
3. Changes intherulesgoverning theEAGGFGuarantee Section
3.1.Councillegislation
Developments in1979wereconfined to:
-theupdating,byRegulation (EEC)No.1030/79,oftheAnnextoRegulation
1
(EEC)No.1883/78layingdowngeneralrulesforintervention financing ,
whichgivesalistofthosemeasures considered asintervention
measures aimedatregulating themarketandthusqualifying for
intervention financing bytheEAGGFGuarantee Section;
Atthebeginning of1980thislistwasagainupdated,byRegulation
(EEC)No.249/80;
anadjustment ,byRegulation (EEC)No.1735/79,ofthetransport
coststobefinanced onastandard ratebasisbytheEAGGFGuarantee
Sectionforthefreedistribution offruitandvegetables withdrawn
fromthemarketbyproducer organizations orpurchased byintervention .
agencies ;
Thesecostshadbeenfixedin1972andhadtobeadjusted totakeaccount
ofchangesintransport costs.
3.2„Commission legislation
In1979,anumberofchangesweremadetotheregulations onfinancing
procedures mainlybytheadoption ofRegulation (EEC)No.1883/78.
Regulation (EEC)No.230/79relatestotheimplementation of
Article 7ofRegulation (EEC)No.1883,whichlaysdownthatif
andagricultural productstoredbyanintervention agencynecessarily
deteriorates asaresultofstorage,theEAGGFGuarantee Section •
bearsthelossforsuchdepreciation fromthetimeofpurchase bythe
intervention agency.Adepreciation co-efficient of0.80wasfixed
inthiswayforbeef.
See8thFinancial Report,point2.1.

VI/169/80-EN
-22-
Thecharging ofthedepreciation to'theEAGGFenablestheinterest _
chargesfinanced bytheEAGGFonfundsimmobilized inMemberStates
forthepurchase ofproducts tobereduced;Regulation (EEC)No.-241/79
accordingly amendedRegulation (EEC)No.467/77onthe,methodof... .. 1calculation oftheinterest costs.
Article 8ofRegulation (EEC)No.1883/78,inparticular thefirst
sub-paragraph ,stipulates thatintervention stocksat31December are
tobevaluedattheaveragepurchase price.Asattheendof.1978,
therefore ,on7December 1979,theCommission adoptedRegulation .(EEC)
"No.2760/79fixingthepricetobeappliedincalculating thevalue .
ofagricultural products whichwereinintervention storage on31Dec­
ember1979andwhichwouldbecarriedforwardtothe1980finanqial
year. ,
Incontrast withthesituation attheendof1978,therewereno
appropriations available attheendoftheyearandthepossibility -
ofdepreciating thevalueofthecarry-over stocks,provided forin
thesecondparagraph ofArticle 8,wasnottherefore exercised .
See8thFinancial Report,paragraph 2.1.2(a).

-23-VI/169/80-EN
TITLE II
CASH POSITION AND FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION
4and 5General situation
During 1979 theinitial appropriations (9602.1 million EUA)entered in
the Budget (Titles 6and 7and Chapter 88)proved markedly insufficient .
Supplementary appropriations were made available insupplementary and
amending budget No.3(802million EUA).
Including anon-automat iccarryover from 1978 (30.4 million EUA),
total appropriations amounted to10434.5 million EUA.The decisions
with regard tothe clearance ofaccounts made afurther net amount of
6.2million EUAavailable ,thus increasing total available funds to
10440.7 million EUA .
The delay inthe adoption ofthe supplementary and amending budget
(itwas only passed on13December 1979 )ledtoproblems for the
Commission ,since itwas unable tomake available tothe Member States
all the advances needed tocover expenditure inNovember and December .
There were also problems for the paying departments and agencies ,as
aresult ,some ofthem having exhausted the funds placed attheir
disposal bythe Community bythe end ofNovember .
After athorough examination ofthe situation ,the Commission decided
fomake use ofthefacility provided bythe last subparagraph of
Article 7ofthe Financial Regulation of21December 1977,and adopted
on 5,December 1979 decisions onadvances designed tocover the needs
ofpaying departments and agencies until 31January 1980 .Theresulting
provisional commitment (provided for inArticle 96ofthe Financial
Regulation )ofanamount of2126 mEUA was made under the heading of
1980 and the payments tothe Member States were made on10December
1979 .
%
After the adoption ofsupplementary and amending budget No.3,this
commitment was reduced by803.6 mEUA (802 mEUA +appropriations still
available from theinitial budget ). Anoverall provisional commitment
equivalent tothis reduction was made inrespect of1979 .

/ .. -
-24-
«hon tiiedata cent inbytheMember States were evaluated ,theCommission becane
aw .'ireduring theceurna ofFebruary 1980 that total ,expenditure bytheMember
State ;.;in1579 exceeded the total funds available . .
After the .amendments sent bythe Member States tothe Corcmission 'pursuant tothe
second subparagraph ofArticle 6(2)ofRegulation Wo380/78hadbeen accepted and
verified ,theexact amount ofthedifference (203,483,472.63 EUA )wasarrived at
atthebeginning ofMarch .This expenditure ,holonger chargeable to1979
accounts ,hasbeen charged to1980 . - ■VI/169/8O-EN

-25- VI/169/80-EN
4. Thecashposition
TheMemberStatescommunicate totheCommission eachmonthinformation
concerning thecashposition,thepayments madeintheprevious month,
andestimated expenditure forthecurrent andfollowing twomonths
prepared bythedepartments andagencies authorized tomakepayments .
Onthebasisofthisinformation ,theCommission ,afterconsulting the
EAGGFCommittee ,determines andpaysouteachmonthtotheMember
Statestheadvancerequired bythepayingdepartments andagencies
untiltheendofthefollowing month.
Ifthefundsmadeavailable toaMemberStatearelikelytobeexhausted
beforethedateonwhichthenextadvanceisdue,adecision maybe
takenonaspecial advance.
TheMemberStatesallocate thefundsreceived betweenthepaying
departments . "" -•
14.1.Advances toMemberStates
Inaccordance withArticles 4and5ofRegulation (EEC)No.729/70and
Regulation (EEC)No.'380/78,theCommission decided on18advances,
including 6specialones,for1979.Fiveofthesespecialadvances
wereforoneMemberState,andwererequired becauseexpenditure
forthemonths -ofApril,May,JuneandSeptember hadbeen -
underestimated .
Inrespectofexpenditure relating tothepremiums forthenon-
marketing ofmilkandtheconversion ofdairyherds,whichare
financed byboththeGuarantee Section (60%)andtheGuidance
Section (40%),theCommission adopted 11decisions onadvances .
Inthispartofthereportthetotalexpenditure isshownwith-
regardtothecashposition,andonlyat60%whenitconcerns
budgetary aspects. - *
1SeeAnnexes 9and10.
Î

Table 7
Funds available toandexpcnd'it -jrebythe MemberStates for the' 1979 financial year - ■
(Guarantee -1-'"'ilk premiums 1C0% )-
.r t -mi11ion EUA ■-
Member State
;Funds avail­
able on
J31.12.77.'-'jAdvances for
1979 financial ^
year (including
exchange diff­
erences )
/.Iota Iavai l-
able for 1979
financial year
■" - -* :Consequences of
clearance of
accounts 1979
and ,decisions .
bythe Court
jClearance 71/72jExpenditure
from T„1s79
to31.12.79
■ !'Balance en
'31.12.79
L L Li2_ j (b) j(c)~(a)+(b) I Td) ' <e)" (f)=(c)-t(o')-Ce )
BELGIUM • "S.'-6 ■J786.1 " 790.7 |i j* 4 !+ i.- f~™802.4 ' |-1^7 '
DENMARK ' f:10-5- " ■j\763.4.773.9 jI!-;'oa "j 787.1 |-13,6 ;')
GERMANY :"■9.9 ' ,2519.7 .2509.8 ' ,v-io.f : 2542.5
FRANCE . ' ' 46".6 2413.2-2459 ,.8 +8.1 2527.- |I.-59,1 -
IRELAND : ! 4.9 '
i•570.-' j! '574^9 ' . +o„i ':.] 592.8 : ■-17.8
ITALY II-8.-
i|1-314.2 |j 1306.2 ■-0o5' :|
i1321.2 I-15.5
LUXEMBOURG ;', °=1 >13»6' !
■ .'i:13.7 ; ;;-0.1 | 13,8 i " 0.2 -
NETHERLANDS -17,9 *|1554.3 :,1536.4 ' 1' +8.3 ,.j.157305 'i -28.8 ,'j
'UNITED KINGDOML„_J3.- , ■- 529.8 i ••532.8 +0.4 i.; 543.4,' "-.-10.2
TOTAL ' \
|;33.9 '•10464.3
! •1;10498.2 .+6.2 10703.7 ■
'-l«-199^3~~ j
lofwhich :n S!■ : :, ■,, ': !r–
{Guarantee ■' I
. .. «'27.8.10406.7 ,v'.j 10434.5 ■+6.2 10644.2 .]I- '-203.5
Guidance\< -■ 6.1
;i57°Ô | 637ji
. •o ... 59.5
*
-A'" I

-27- VI,/169/80-EN
14.2.Fundsavailable intheMemberStatesduringthefinancial year
Inaddition tothebalanceof33.9mEUAon1January,theMember
Stateshadattheirdisposal during1979advances totalling 10464.3
mEUAplusthefundsavailable afterthedecisions ontheclearance
ofaccounts (6.2mEUA).
f
Totalfundsavailable were10504„4 mEUA,ofwhich10440=7
wasfortheGuarantee Section and63.7fortheGuidance Section .
Ofthisamount10703.7 mEUAwasspent,leaving abalanceof
-203.5 mEUAfortheGuarantee Section arid+4.2mEUAforthe
Guidance Section on31December 1979.
4.3.Rateofutilization ofthefundsavailable
Theunusual circumstances inwhichtheEAGGFGuarantee Section was
operating duringthelasttwomonthsoftheyearmakeitdifficult
todetermine thepercentage utilization offunds.
Certainadjustments' mustbemade ,beforecomparing theserateswith
thoseofprevious years*Thus,ifthesubsequent allocation to
1979ofpart(803.6million EUA)oftheadvancepaidon10December
1979istakenintoaccount,Annex11incolumn DECreducesallthe
balances tozero.TableNo.8usesthefiguresonlyforthefirst
10monthsoftheyear.
Inviewofthisallthefundsmadeavailable totheMemberStates
canbeconsidered ashavingbeenusedupby31December 1979.
However,thecomparison betweentheaverageofthefundsavail­
abletocoverexpenditure ineachofthetenfirstmonthsofthe
financial yearandtheaverageofthebalances available after
deduction ofexpenditure (Table8)indicates anaveragerateof
utilization of77%,whichisthesameasthatfor-1978.
SeeTable No.7.

-28--VI/169 /.80-EN
TABLE No.8
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE RATE OF USE OF COMMUNITY FUNDS
AT 31 OCTOBER 1979
f
(Guarantee +Non Marketing andDairy Herd Conversion Premiums
at 100% )
mEUA <%>
Member State
/Average Community
funds available in
the Member States
for one month 's '\
expenditure (An­
nexes 11and 12,
line C)
#Average balance
available after
one mont h's
expenditure
(Annexes 11and 12,
line E)Average rate of
utilizat ion
(a) - "(b) (c)=Ca)"(b).10Q
(a)
BELGIUM 93.6 23.7 75%
OFWMARK ' i ^69.8 0.9 99%
GERMANY 305.3 97.6 68%
FRANCE • 264.2 49.5 81%
IRELAND ' 57.8 8.7 85%
ITALY 188 .- 76.9 59% .
LUXEMBOURG 2.3 1.1 52%
NETHERLANDS 116.5 -12.4 111%
UNITED KINGDOM 65.9 20.9 68% "
EEC 1163.4 266.9 Λ 77%

VI/169/80-EN
-29-
Financial administration
Summary ofavailable appronr lations
Initial budget
Supplementary and amending budget No.3
Non-automatic carryover from 1978 to1979
(marketing premium )9602 100 000.00 EUA
802 000 000.00 EUA
30430 739.03 EUA
Total appropriations available 10A34530 739.03 EUA
Transfers ofappropriations
The way inwhich expenditure was developing during the year ledthe
Commission topropose transfers ofappropriations with supplementary
and amending budget No.3(see column boftable No.9).
Expenditure
Expenditure entered inthe accounts
Expenditure declared bythe Member States and entered inthe
accounts for 1979 amounts to10440 673 297.94 EUA,ofwhich
6142 558.91 isthe amount offunds made available asaresult
ofdecisions onthe clearance ofaccounts .12.1% ofthe total
amount represents expenditure connected with public storage
and 87.9% expenditure onexport refunds and Other intervention measures .
Adetailed analysis ofexpenditure bysector isgiven inthe first
part ofthis report inTable 2and atAnnex 1.Table 10below gives
thebreakdown ofexpenditure byMember State .
This breakdown should betreated with caution because the time
taken tomake payments canvary considerably from oneMember State
toanother andtheexpenditure made bythepaying agencies inagiven
Member State cannot beconsidered asnatural expenditure since the
Community isasingle economic entity .Afinal series oftransfers ofappropriations was approved bythe
Council on9April 1980 totake account oftotal expenditure in
1979 .

TABLE No.9
iChapterT
t
i
! Sectori
IInitial budget for
I 1Q7QTransfer ofappropriations Non-aut ornat icI
I
»
I
I | \7I7 L_ carryover from ADDroDriat ions
i Supplementary and"
Other1978 available j
\
i■amending budget...
I
i!
–No.3. "·;τ
i
(a)
i –(b) ■■
(c) (d) I (e)
60 Cereals 1874 200 -300 000 ■■- 8593Γ
,1565 607
61 Rice 41400 •+ 1293 42693
62 Milk Products3717600 |+742 000..+31406 ,,■30431 ,4521 437
I63
ij.0iIsandFats
>j'522900+ 70000 +13444 ,606 344
|64
i '-Sugar 1004 600-64780 !939820
j65 jBeef andveal 488 300 +220 000
-4+39456 747.756
66 j
IPigmeat
l84900 + 10000 , + 9431 "" 104 331
!67
iEggs,poultry 41200 +.25000+13286. 79486
68
|Fruit,vegetables '^ 326 500 +'90.000 +24956I
.441 456
69 Wine
j1119 400 ...-- 25000..,. 33098 , 61302
70 Tobacco
■i762 OiDO ."7 -"" 50000+13461 225 461
73 IOther sectors 112 500+ 7711 120 211
74 , Refunds onprocess­ ..... ..• •• !
edproducts 176 200 -+ 60-000 +15967 252 167
75 Accession CAs1200 .'- .80 1120
78 MCAs 809 200 40000 -60872I
708 328 !
88
" 'Fisheries 20000-2988 j'17 012
TOTAL 9602 100.+802 000 0 30431 10434 531

VI/169/80-EN
-31-
TabLe 10
Breakdown of1979 expenditure byMember State_____ - –
and bytype offinancing
Member StateRefunds Intervent ionTotals 1979 1978
mEUA mEUA mEUA % %
BELGIUM 580.9 205.0
I785.9 7.53!6.94
DENMARK ■'421.8 335.6 757.4 7.25 9.30
GERMANY 892.5 1597.8 2490.3 23.85 28.70
FRANCE 1413.0 1065.3 2478.3 23.74 20.06
IRELAND 252.2 320.7 572.9 5.49 6.37
ITALY 177.9 1.142.2 1.320.1 12.64 ;8.61
LUXEMBOURG 5.5 8.0 13.5 0.13 0.27
NETHERLANDS 985.7 508.7 1494.4 14.31 14.69
UNITED KINGDOM 252.3 275.6 527.9 5.06 5.06
EEC TOTAL 4981.8 5458.9 10440.7 100.00 100.00
This takes noaccount ofcorrections tothe breakdown ofexpenditure by
Member States when the exporting Member State pays the MCAs instead of
the importing Member State (seeTable 4)orofthetransfers ofreceipts
between intervention agencies when agricultural products aretrans­
ferred at'nil' prices .
5.3.2 . Budget operations
Thedeclarations ofthe expenditure incurred byMember States
upto31December 1979 gave rise toanumber offinancial
commitments and charges for payment against the budget after
scrutiny bythestaff ofthe EAGGF Guarantee Section .

VI/169/8Q-EN
(a) ,Financi alCommit mentsandcharges for paymen ts . .-
-Periodically two typ'as offinancial commitment are made :overall commit­
ments ,forfunds made available tothe Member States forpayments and
specific commitments bybudget item^-based onpayments bythepaying
departments .-
Amount available toMember States
atthebeginning of1979 27809 218.14 EDA
Advances t®Member States inrespect of
1979 •- . 10406 721 520.89 EUA
Total overall commitments 10^434530739.03 EUA
Specific commitments bybudget item -1$434'530739.03 EUA (1)
Balance 0
In1979 thespecific «g®fnitments were thef^for.e equivalent tothe
amount charged for payment . :
(b) Consequences ofthe decisions onthe clearance:of accounts .
Pursuant toArticle 99ofthe Financial Regulation ^theeffect ofdecisions
inrespect of1971,1972 ,and 1973 wasthat thejfoliowing amounts were
treated aspositive ornegative expenditure : I
Decisions 79/893 to901/EEC of12October 1979
onthe clearance ofaccounts for 1973 +18 *013 053.21 ^EUA
(additions ^amounts available )
Decision 79/886/EECof12October 1979
fottSMiing adecision ofthe Court of
Justice -1971 and 1972 (additional ^'
expenditure ' -11870 494.30 EUA
Additigj^l net funds tocover T979 >
expenditure + 6142 558.91 EUA .
These funds enabled some expenditure over and above the expenditure
covered bytjfcSi appropriations tobeentered inthe 1979 accounts .
1
Ofwhich 30430 739.03 incarryovers .

-33- VI/i69/80-E;aS
Title III
ENQUIRIES ,IRREGULARITIES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES
6. Enqui ries
6.1.Power s
Theadministrations inthe Member States are responsible forgiving effect to
Community rules and thus have theprimary responsibility forensuring the
factual and procedural correctness oftheoperations financed bythe Fund .
1The Commission staff ,fortheir part ,carry ou'c sHide range ofcheeks ,which
are coordinated byaninterdepartmental working group responsible forplanning
the inspection visit toMember States .
Intheverification ofexpenditure financed bythe Guarantee Section ,leaving
aside the checks made inconnection with the -audit and clearance ofthe accounts ,
adistinction ismade between investigations into suspi cious "causes and "selective "
checks .The .checks generally cover all the Member States and are intended to
examine problems encountered inaparticular sector ofsphere .
6.2.Selective checks undertaken
Itshould bepointed out that this type ofcontrol isthe only one toapply
automatically toall Member States involved inthe operation being controlled .
In1979 .checks were carried out with regard tomonetary compensatory amounts
(MCAs).The checks -showed apparent differences inthe way the MCA-system was
applied inthe Member States ,shortcomings' ininternal control ,and inthe
treatment ofdocumentary evidence ,aswell asinstances inwhich Community
provisions were not respected .These shortcomings have been communicated to
the Member States for corrective action .The relevant Commission services will
beinvolved infollowing upandevaluating these aryas .
6.3.Investigations undertaken
In1979 the Commission made use ofits control power in .27cases ,most ofthese
related todairy products and monetary compensatory amounts which can belargely
explained ,aswith MCAs,bythefinancial significance and complexity ofthe
sector .
These investigations related toone ormore Member States ,asfollows :
B DK D. F IRL I L NL UK TOTAL
6 2 5 4 3 3 ì Ì 2 27
J
Enquiries are undertaken asrequired and there isthus no even distribution "
among Member States . 1
The results ofthese enquiries can besummarized asfollows :
In14cases the suspicion ofirregularity proved tobeunfounded .Five other
enquiries will ,hays financial consequences and in2cases anomalies were
detected .Sisenquiries arestill inprogress .
C1iIseal bsses :Regulation (ESC)Nos «'729/70and 2&5/12*

-34- .VI/169/80
Someinvestigations seemtotakerather,a longtimeeCloser
examinatiori shows,however,thatworkoncomplexcasessometimes takes
•-severalmonths,,anda"fileopenedduringtheyearisofcoursenot
alwaysclosedbeforetheendof.thatyear.Elevenenquiries werestill
pendingornearingcompletion attheendof1978.Threehavemean­
whileledtothedetection ofirregularities orhavehadfinancial
consequences inconnection withtheclearance oftheaccounts.
7.Irregularities
\Itisprimarily theresponsibility oftheMemberStatestotakethe
. .necessary actiontoprevent anddealwithirregularities andto
recoveroverpayments .TheCommunity isresponsible forthe
•financial consequences ,however,whentherecoveryprocedure -initiated
- following anirregularity failstoelicitrepayment oftheloss
r •
incurred .Thisjointresponsibility required asystemofnotification
andcoordination ,whichwasintroduced byRegulation(EEC)No.283/72
adopted bytheCouncil on7February .1972.
EAGGFstaffalsoanalyseexisting provisions andareinvolved inthe
drafting ofnewComuunity agricultural regulations'withtheaimof
incorporating intotheinstruments measures tocloseloopholes orprevent
potential irregularities . „
' ■ ■ " * •'
.7.1.Thesystemofcoooeratio'n andpromptnotification -
Twoimportant mechanisms facilitate closecooperation betweenthe
MemberStatesandtheCommission incombating irregularities .The
~' firstisthe"promptexchange ofinformationconcerning irregularities .
liabletohaverapideffects bpyondtheMemberStateconcerned and
■'.irregularities involving anewfraudulent practice;andthesecond
consists ofmeetings ofexpertsfromtheNationalauthorities and.
theCommission -theEAGGFIrregularities Group-atwhichallthe
vinformation exchanged isperiodically reviewed.
Thenotifications undertherapidinformation systemwereas
follows :■
BDK'0FIRLIL:'NL UK.COMMUNITY TOTAL ■
Total1972-1978 6071010 10243 7 86
1979 4 006'3 17
AnnualAverage :,*

-35- VI/169/80-EN
The information exchanged under this system related mainly todairy
products ,the most costly and most complex sector .
7.2. Irregularities detected
7.2.1 . The Member States are required tonotify the Commission quarterly
oftheirregularities detected and the progress made inthe recovery
ofoverpayments .Details for 1979 can befound inAnnex 16.Itis
apparent from this table that the number ofcases ofirregularities ,
reported in1979 andtheamount involved were *roughly the same asin
1978 anddose tothe average forprevious years ,i.e. :
100to120 cases involving atotal of .2to3million u.a.
». :
The amounts for 1973 to1978 were asfollows :!
(mio EUA) 1973 1974 1975 1976 51977 1978 1979
Amounts 1.3 4.4 3.0 5.3 !8.3 2.2 2.1
recovered 0.7 1.0 1.3 2.? ; •2.0 1.0 1.2
7.2.2 . The large figures for 1976 and 1977 are explained bynine cases
t
detected in1976 involving 3.3million EUA and nine others detected in
< •
1977 involving 5.5million EUA.
These large-scale irregularities had,"however ,taken place over a
number ofyears .Closer examination also reveals that discovery of
this type ofirregularity depends onanumber offactors which are
not often all present .There istherefore noreason tothink that the .
inspection and investigation authorities were less vigilant during
1979 .
Asregards the types ofexpenditure ,itisstriking that the percentage
ofirregularities relating tointervention measures ismuch greater
than inthe past .Such cases accounted for 71% ofthetotal number and
thetotal amount ofirregularities notified in1979,ascompared with
less than 50%ofthose notified communications in1976,1977 and 1978 .
These circumstances arecurrently under examination bythe EAGGF ,because
therelationship between intervention expenditure onthe one hand,and
refunds and MCAs ontheother has remained virtually unchanged .

-36- VI/169/80-EN
Asinthepast,alarge number ofcases reported related tobeef and .
todairy products ,which islogical inview oftheimportance of
these sectors .This isnotreflected ,however ,inthe amounts involved ,
which are not 'very large .
.'.2.3 . Thefact that In1979 three Member States together accounted .for 80% ~
ofthe number ofcases reported confirms ,asinprevious years ,an
uneven pattern among the Member States .Apossible explanation ,other
'than thedifferences inadministrative practices ,isthat the Member
States interpret the concept of"irregularity "indifferent ways .The
EAGGF has taken upthis matter inbilateral 'talks with the Member States .
However ,this 'uneven pattern' must ofcourse also beanalysed from
thepoint ofview oftheexpenditure involved andthegeographical
distribution .Amore balanced result emerges when intervention cases
are excluced -and cases orirregularities involving refunds and MCAs
are "Considered (for more detailed figures see Annex 17).
Member State ■ B 0 OK FR IRL I L NL UK
Cases reported f-n1971-1979 15 259*·" 71 77 22 34 - 39 10θ"'
ofwhich :
intervention 11 182 26 33 9 32 - .15 23 '
refunds ,and MCAs 4 77 - 45 44 13 2 - .24 77""
î :–: r : : :–ttyWtiyofreference ,
|intervent jonexpendi -200 1500 .200 '1000' 200 -1200 token 300 400
iture in1979 was as entry
foiiows (million EUA ) .
These figures prompt thefollowing comments : •,'
-Intervention expenditure ishigh inGermany ;this could explain
'thenum&erof cases reported forthis type ofexpenditure .
-Intervention expenditure isalso high inItaly .Therelatively small
number ofcases reported regarding intervention could bedue tothe
' fact that there are over onemillion small olive and durum wheat
producers inthecountry ,whose requests foraid are always subjected
tochecks before payment .
Inaddition ,theirregularities which might occur would probably not
amount toasmuch as 1000 EUA and would not therefore have tobe
-communicated tothe EAGGF under article 11ofRegulation (EEC)No.283/72
-Itshould also bepoinrted -out--that"the"audit of"commercial documents
provided forinCouncil Directive 77/435/EEC (seeparagraph 7.6)
hasalready been customary incertain Member States for some time *
SoAnnex 15.

-37- VI/169/80-EN
Thesubsequent scrutiny ofdocuments ascarried-out bythese
Member States inaddition tothephysical controls prescribed bythe
regulations automatically reveals ahigher number ofcases ofirregula­
rities compared tothecountries rely ;,toagreater extent onaverification
oftheactual operation inquestion before payment .
Detection before payment would appear atfirst sight topresent an
advantage ,butitisbecoming increasingly difficult torelyonphysical
checks astheamount oftrade andthenumber ofcontrol -operat ions
arecontinually increasing compared tothemanpower available .
With effect from 1July 1979 ,theother Member States will
progressively adapt their systems tothemore modern sndrational
techniques laid down inthis Directive ,which tak*a account of
thegrowth oftrade .
Recovery ofamounts inconnection with legal proceedings concerning
i."-regular ities
Thegeneral situation asregards amounts recovered from 1971 to1979
isshown atAnnex 15.Thenational recovery procedures seem tolap*- - '
rather along time .Ifthey appear tobetaking toolong ,
Commission sends regular reminders totheMember State ?.
/
When there isadispute ,which ismore often the case with the largest
irregularities ,overpayments cannot berecovered until the legal
proceedings have been completed ,andthis explains thedelays incertain
cases .
Training ofofficials' managing EAGGF expenditure
Inconncection with the further training ofnational officials
responsible for surveillance ofoperations financed bythe EAGGF ,in
1979 the Commission organised :
-a seminar ontheprevention offraud and false declarations inthe
wine sector ;
-a seminar fornational inspectors from thepaying agencies on
counterfeiting and falsification ofdocuments .
Papers byexperts described thetechniques used andthe means of
detection .
Theconclusions andrecommendations emerging from theexperts'meetings ,
were forwarded totheMember States with arequest that they take the
appropriate action .

VI/169/80-EN
7.5.ThespecialCommittee ofInquiry (SCI)
Afterinvestigating thebeef,andwinesectors,theSpecialCommittee of
Inquiryturneditsattentipn in1978tothecerealssectorproper,i;e.
excluding riceandfoodaid.Workonthissubject wascompleted inthe
middleof197.9andareportwasforwarded bytheCommission tothe
Councilon3December 1979. ,'
- ..V _ t . • ^
TheCommittee maderecommendations forimproving theexisting legislation
(clarification ,simplification ,reviewofcertainintervention measures
' fromthepointofviewoftheircostandtheireconomic significance )
aswellas-onitsimplementation andcontrol.' •
7.6.Auditofoperators' commercial documents
Theanalysis in1976/77ofthecontrol methods whichmostfrequently
ledtothedetection ofirregularities showedthattheauditof
accounts andcommercial documents wasthemosteffective method.
~ ofoperations withintheEAGGFGuarantee Sectionsystemsoffinancing,
Council Directive 77/435/EECtakesaccount of-theresults ofthis
analysis .Itprovides forthesystematic scrutiny byMemberStates
onthebasisofthecommercial documents oftheconcerns receiving
ormakingpayments .Aminimum numberofconcerns havetobeinspected
everyyearbyeachMemberState,selection beingmadeinrelation tothe
amountofGuarantee Sectionexpenditure orreceipts involved .
TheDirective alsodefinesthepowersoftheofficials responsible forthe
controls andprovides formutualassistance between MemberStates.
Information compiled inthiswayistreatedasconfidential .'
SincethisDirective enteredintoforceonlyrecently (1July1979),the
firstresultsofthecontrols willnotbeknownuntil .1980.

-39-\
VI/169/80-EN
Title IV
8.1.
8.1.1 .8.AUDIT AND CLEARANCE OFACCOUNTS
1973 Accounts
1On12October 1979 the Commission adopted itsaudit and clearance
decisions' forthe 1973 accounts and agreed atotal charge tothe
EAGGF Guarantee Section of3598 533 266.52 u.a.
This figure corresponds totheexpenditure declared bythe Member
States of3635 688 028.OAu.a.,subject toadeduction of
37154801.52 u.a.toaccount forthecorrections resulting from
verification bythe EAGGF .
Expenditure declared andaccepted isasfollows ,broken down by
Member State and expressed innational currencies :
Table 11Resultats ofthe 'clearance ofthe 1973 accounts
Innational currencies
jMember State [Expenditure charged ]Expenditure H1Corrections . 1[Expenditure agreed ADO1icarionofArt .99of *<n.r1
|_ |deolared JI '
! .EU*2) !
i
a b c d e»a-d f !
Belgiu« BFR ij9.655.813 .C82,--I I
}9.681 .03?.306,-H[63.952.369 ,-- jI
IV.617.084.437,-- |I-28.728.645 ,--|-957.5-6,i
Oenmark 0KR !2.215.396.901,07 I2.219.815.904,301 | 213.229,61 I2.218.602.674,69 j|3.205.773,621 440.300,20 !
,6er«any ON i2.473.936.239,43 2.480.179.109,21 !9,192.762,41 2.470.986.346,80 ji-2.949.892,63 j-1.1fc7.9iS,15 ;
fr»nee ff 6.080.225.710,98 4.161 .914.284,351 t129.327 .122,10 6.032.587.162,25 I-47.638.548,73 |-8.105.419,33 !
Ireland m I 37.048.429,91 37.028.463,161 806,88 37.027.656,28 j -20.773,63 I-30.918,75 i
Italy LIT 363.490.831 .440,– 365.521.492.146 ,–:1452.206.248 ,-- 364.069.235 .898,– ]578.454.458 ,– || 512.291,951
Luieabourg LfR 11270.831.091 ,-- 273.205.138,90 ] 48.009,90 . 273.157.129 ,– j2.326.038 ,–|. 57.5C-7,73j
Netherlands MfL 1.909.544.794,98 1.910 .956.167,59j24.519.398,66 1,886.436.768,93 j-23.108.026,05 !-8.329.167.57 ,
jUnited Kingdow UKL 63.251 .756,3863.378.448,731
1396.368,33 I 62.952.080,40 i
i |-269.675,93 j|-432.222,92 ]
TOTAL : -18.013.053,21 j
8.1.2 . Asstated above ,corrections resulting from the clearance ofaccounts
meant that Community financing was reduced bysome 37 mu.a.Since
the annual audit and clearance declarations bythe Member States were
21 mu.a.higher than theexpenditure initially entered onthebasis
ofthemonthly declarations ,theaudit and clearance ofaccounts has
therefore ,inaccordance with Article 99oftheFinancial Regulation ,made
anadditional sumofapproximately 16mu.a.available inrespect of1979
(i.e. 18 mEUA). :
1)0JNo.L278 of7.11.1979 .
ntheiTate.o°-,f«2(}-8-1973 (0JN0»c209/79)valid forthemonth ofOctober 1979 .

VI/169/80-EN
-40-
8.1.3 . The correction of37.2 mu.a.made todeclared expenditure inthe net
effect ofnegative adjustments of40.2 mu.a.andpositive adjustments of
3mu.a.;theLatter corresponds toexpenditure declared in1974 but
chargeable against 1973 andtoexchange gains . •
With regard tothereduction inexpenditure ,itshould benoted that,
outofthetotal of40-.2 mu.a.,8.4 mu.a.covered expenditure tobe
carried forward toasubsequent financial year ,and approval was
previously withheld inrespect of2.6 mu.a.until ,further details or .
supporting documents are supplied by'the Member States .
The expenditure deducted for non-compliance with Community rules
therefore amounts to29.2 mu.a.,the breakdown ofwhich isasfollows :
_refunds and MCA's: 19.8 mu.a.
intervention expenditure for milk products : 4.4 mu.a.
sugar : 2.9 mu.a.
wine : 1.0 mu.a.
various : .1.1mu.a.
8.1.4 . Three Member States appealed tothe Court ofJustice for annulment of
the clearance decisions of12October 1979 ..These were asfollows ; '
(a) Federal Republic ofGermany V ■, ;
Action brought on19December 1979 against the Commission decision to
exclude anamount of DM8335 232.61 (2277 385.96 u.a.)fordenaturing
1skimmed-mi Ikpowder (Case No.819/79).
(b) Belgium
Action^brought on19December 1979 against the Commission decision to
exclude anamount ofBFR.29008 562 (580 171.24 u.a.)inrespect of
payment ofdifferentiated export refunds for milk and milk products
(Case No.820/79)1. '
(c) .Italy .
,Action brought on28December 1979 against the Commission decision to
exclude anamount ofLJT 604 863 175 (967 781.08 u.a.)inrespect of
the payment ofaidfor long-term storage contracts for wine
(Case No.1251/79)2.
0J No.C18of24.1.1980 •
20JNo.C37of14.2.1980 ' " .

-41-VI/169/80-EN
Inaddition tocorrections toexpenditure /theverification workunder­
takeninconnection withtheclearance ofthe1973accounts alsoshowed
upsomeweaknesses orshortcomings inrespectof':thepresentation of
data;thetransmission ofreports ;themonitoring andrecording of
expenditure intheaccounts ;therulesofthepayingagencies ;and
theavailability oforiginal supporting documents .
Accounts forfinancial yearsfrom1974to1979
Inordertospeeduptheauditandclarance process,theworkhasbeen
groupedintotwo-year periods :1974and1975;and1976and1977.The
samewillalsobedonefor1978and1979.
Verification preparatory toauditandclearance ofthe1974and1975
accounts wascompleted inSeptember 1979.
Underthedialogue procedure ^theEAGGFstaffreported totheMember
Statestheirreservations prompted bythecontrols carriedout,and
advised themofthecorrections whichitwasproposed tomakeinthe
declared expenditure .
ThetimeneededbytheMemberStatestofurnishtheircomments onthe
EAGGFobservations delayedfurther andcausedsomedelayinthedialogue
thusthepreparation oftheauditandclearance decisions ;theseshould,
however,beadoptedduringthelastquarterof1980.
Verification preparatory toauditandclearance ofthe1976and1977accounts
beganinOctober 1979andshouldbecompleted inSeptember 1980,so
thattheauditandclearance decisions canbetakentowards theendof
thefirstquarterof1981.
Itshouldbenotedthattoenablethebacklogtobereduced,the
Commission hasagreedthatverification forthefinancial years1976
to1979should becarried outonamoreselective basis.Themain
criteria employed inthisselection concerns :thesizeandgrowthof
expenditure ;theresultsofchecksalreadycarriedout,whether acomplex
orrecently introduced measureisinvolved ;theexistence ofparticular
problems . •

-42"VI/169/80-EN "
Consequences ofthe judgments delivered bythe Court ofJustice
The judgments delivered on7February 1979 bythe Court ofJustice ,
inCases Nos.11,15,16,and 18/76were discussed atlength in
the Eighth' Financial Report atparagraph 8.3.2 .,which dealt with the
principles involved aswell asthe implications .Inits judgement
onCase No.18/76,the Court endorsed the Commi ssion 's~posit ion onthe
question ofprinciple infive ofthe six pending cases .Asaresult
ofthe judgement delivered inthesixth case ,decisions 76/141/EEC and
76/147/EEC onthe audit and clearance ofthe accounts submitted bythe
Federal Republic ofGerman /for 1971 and 1972 respectively were
declared void tothe extent that the Commission had not charged tothe
r
EAGGF the amounts paid bythe German authorities asaid for the purchase
o*butter bypersons qualifying for welfare assistance .Inits
Decision No.79/886of12October 1979,the Commission acknowledged that
the expenditure inquestion ,which amounted to DM17930 880.40 for 1971
in-,aDM12051 258.00 for 1972 was chargeable tothe Guarantee Section
orthe EAGGF . -

-43-VI/169/80-EN
Title V
FINANCING OFCOMMUNITY FOODAIDFORPRODUCTS SUBJECT TO
COMMON ORGANIZATIONS
9.1.Characteristics ofCommunity foodaid
9.1.1.Foreword
TheCommunity foodaidprogrammes for1979,adoptedattheendofMay
1979,made150000tonnesofskimmed-mi Ikpowder,45000tonnesof
butteroil and720500tonnesofcerealsavailable tothebeneficiary
countries andorganizations .
Inaddition tothesequantities madeavailable for1979,therewere
residues fromprevious programmes (about300000tonnes)forwhich
appropriations werestillavailable (bycarry-over orre-entry inthe
budget).
ApartfromCommunity foodaidassuch,theannualparticipation for
1979oftheMemberStatesunderthe1971FoodAidConvention totalled
about566500tonnesofcereals (national aidundertheConvention ),plus
acertain amountofmiscellaneous national aidoutside theConvention .
Alltheseaidsqualified totalorpartial Community financing ,depending
onthecircumstances ^andamountscorresponding totherefundswere
chargedtotheEAGGFGuarantee budget.Amountsequivalent totheaids,
expressed inworldprices,werechargedtoChapter 92(Community aid)
ortonational budgets (national aidundertheConvention oraidoutside
theConvention ).
Thissectionisconcerned onlywithexpenditure underChapter 92ofthe
BudgetoftheEuropean Communities .
9.1.2.Mobilization procedure
Products tobeprovided underfoodaidarrangements areusuallymobilized
withinthecommonmarketorganizations ,whethertheyaredrawnfrom
publicintervention stocksorpurchased ontheCommunity market.9.1.
9.1.1.

J, Vi./iCVi OJ ,t;j
However ,because cfexceptional .circumstances in1979,some products -
were purchased for thefirst tirr.e onthe world market for food
donations toNicaragua andtothe refugees from South-East Asia .
9.1.3 . Work carried out /
Food .aidprovided in1979 can besummarized bythefollowing
approximate figures : -
S
product 1979 *
programmePrèvious .
programmesTotal
(tonnes ^
*
Cereals (wheat
equivalent ) 521 000}
143 000 664 000
Butteroi l 15000 36000 51000
Skimmed milk
powder 58000 124 000 ' 182 000
9.1.4. Payments ;
Payments inrespect offood aid are made through the intervention agencies
after the necessary documents have been presented bythe successful
tenderer .However ,inthe case ofthe products purchased onthe world
market forNicaragua ,payments were made directly bythe Commission .
For the purpose ofmaking the necessary funds available tothe Member
r-States under Chapter 92,monthly advances are made inasimilar
fashion tothose under the Guarantee Section .

-45- VI/169 /80-EN
9.2 . The cash position
9,2.1 . Advances
Themonthly advances requested bytheMember States andcovered by
Commission Decisions amounts to273436594,22 EUAforthe1979
financial yeaTo
Abreakdown byMember State ofadvances approved ,*expenditure incurred
andthepercentage utilization ofadvances isgiven inthefollowing
table :
Table 12 :Breakdown andutilization ofmonthly advances in19 ,1'9
iMember State
jBelgium
I
Denmark
Germany
France -
Ire land
11aiy
Luxembourg
Netherlands .
United Kingdom
EEC TOTALAdvances in
EUA
!
-4-"49194
20352
90541
6399?
8546
20268
2117
16990
Ï432157.51
017.66
497 ,,39
684 „87
136.72
961 »91
419„84
562 .,94
155,38Expenditure asat
31.12.1 9792! Rate of
utilization
273 436 594.22JL44529
17703
79317
59204
7694
.12495
2097
16936
1167944.57
.341.57
968„08
518.37
917*62
141 .86
970.83
684 ,43
859.62
241 148 346,9591%
8"'e/
88%
93%
90%
62%
99%
99%
82%
88%
Comparison ofthese figures with those fortheprevious financial year
shows anaverage increase inexpenditure onfood aid.
Therate ofutilization appears tobeconstant atabout 90% .
1Including thebalance availabte 35aiJ°1
Financial Report (1978 financial yea-.,p„V9,
of2340-9328,16EUA (EUArate of20,11.19^3 )31u12 ft1978a?shown intheEighth
Pt(1978 finsocial year ,p.9?,Table 1II,column e>,asum
Monthly expenditure declared bytheMember States ,

VI/169/80-EN
\
Cnanges inthé cash position .
Annex 19shows the cash position at31December 1979 .The funds
available tothe Community before adjustment and broken down by
Member State ,'amounts to32288 247.27 EUA.These advances which
.were not used bythe Member States by31December 1979 were re­
adjusted onthe basis ofthe EUArate applicable tothe January
1980 advances (Annex 19,col e).
>- . -
These accounting operations donotaffect the balance ofthe food
aid accounts kept innational currencies bythe Member States .
Administration ofpayment appropr iations
Total appropriations available in1979 .
Thefollowing appropriations areavailable (see Annex 21)jn l
appropriations carried forward from 1978 because ofdelays in
implementing some food aid programmes : 100 070 567.47
-new appropriations inthe 1979 budget : . 287 336 000
-supplementary appropriations forcarrying out certain special
measures (Malta ,Cambodian refugees ....) :
1) 3700 000
2) . 5000 000
TOTAL :396 106 567.47
Appropriations committed
Alltheappropriations available in1979 were committed ,atotal of
396 106 567.47 EUA. • ^
Payments
(a)Expenditure declared bythe Member States
Table 12and Annexes 19and 20show theexpenditure declared bythe
Member States atotal of241 148 346.95 EUA.The amounts charged t
theBudget during 1979 will notnecessarily bethe same asthose in
thefinal accounts tobe'shown subsequently inthe Commission 'scle
decisions .

-47-VI/169/80-EN
Thedifferences between theapproved advances andactual expenditure
represent thebalances available asat31December 1979 .These
balances areconsidered asadvances for the 1980 financial year and
theMember States mayaccordingly usethem tocover expenditure for
1980 .
(b)Direct Payments
Apart from theadvances made totheMember States *intervention agencies ,
the Commission made anumber ofdirect payments tocertain recipient
countries oragencies asfinancial contributions towards the cost of
freighting anddistributing theproducts supplied asfood aid .Anumber
ofcontracts for thepurchase offoodstuffs onthe world market were
concluded through the Commission and the relevant payments were made by
the EAGGF .
These direct payments totalled 17858 981.11 EUA in1979 (seeAnnex 21).
The following table shows thebreakdown ofthis amount byrecipient :
Table 13
Beneficiaryi
j Direct Payments
Lebanon1 –
I
; 14383.77
JBangladesh | 3280521.93
Guinea-Bissau; 7365.68
UNRWA (various ) | 948441.59
WFP (various )| 3108050.64
NG0 (various )j 3669309.81
India| 2655788.82
Caritas (various ) jj 808083.48
ISomalia j| 501037.61
jUpper Volta || 9686.44
Jamaica j| 120646.27
INicaragua j| 783762.34
CRS (Chile ) \
j 1869537.01
CRS (Haiti ) i
I
!j 82365.72
i
I
I
j; 17858981.11 EUA

VI/169/80-EN
9.4.Appropriations carriedforwardto1980
.Underthe1977financial Regulation ,,the1979budgetappropriations are
committed assoonastheprogrammes areadopted bytheCouncil.
Accordingly ,appropriations committed in1979whichdidnotleadtopay­
mentsareautomatically carriedoverto1980.The,amountinvolved was .
137099239.40EUA. .;!
9.5.Closure oftheaccounts
9.5.1.Vérification
Eachfoodaidmeasureiscovered byadetailed statement ofexpenditure ,
drawnupbytheappropriate intervention agencyaccording totheprocedure
laiddowninthefinancial regulations .Thesedocuments arethoroughly checked
onreceiptagainstinformation inthepossession oftheCommission ,in
particular inrespectofintervention prices,tenderpricesandthe
amounts ofrefunds.
Thisscrutiny isfollowed byverification visitstothepayingagencies .
EAG6Fofficials devoted 54workingdaystosuchvisits.
9.5.2.AuditandClearance ofaccounts
Thestaffexpecttobeabletoclosethe1975and1976accounts during
1980andtodisposeofthebacklogintheauditandclearance ofaccounts
bytheendof1982. •
1SeeAnnex21.

VI/169/SG~EN
ΝΝΕΧΕ5

VI/169/80-EN
-50-
ANN|K|§_I_£Q^I|^I §
• Page
Guarantee Section
1.Expenditure charged forthe 1979 financial year 51
2.EAGGF Guarantee explanations bysector (1975-1979 ) 63
3.Breakdown ofexpenditure byeconomic category 65
4.Breakdown ofintervention inrespect ofstorage costs 67
5.Quantity andvalue ofproducts inpublic storage 68
6.Breakdown ofintervention expenditure inthe form of '69
price compensation aids ,"
7.Overall cost ofthe Guarantee Section inrelation .-70
togross domestic product (GDP )
8.Equalization ofstorage costs for sugar 71
9.Guarantee Section :advances and funds available 72 .
10.Milk premiums :advances and funds available 73
11.Funds available inMember States bymonth :
Guarantee Section . -74
12.Funds available inMember States bymonth : j
milkpremiums j 75
»
13,Exchange rates -1979 76
14.Exchange differences -1979 financial year 77
15.Cases ofirregularity (1971-1979 )andrecovery j
ofoverpayments . ' 78
16.Cases ofirregularity (1979 );recovery ofover - I
payments -'5 79
1 r
17.Irregularities relating tointervention payments 80
Food Aid
18.Summary ofimplementation forthe1979 financial year 81 -
19.Cash position at31December 1979 82
20.Expenditure declared bytheMember States 83
21.Budget appropriations ,1979 84

VI/169/8C~cN
. *
'ANNEX 1 4
Expenditure charged forthe 1979 financial year
mtUA
ITEM jjBelqium|^Denmar!T~[7 "1Germany 1
U« i.– !
France jIreland ]Italy [luxem-h^nfiiNether -jtinited IIIJrtrir 1/J– I«-vn
[TECTotal
CEREAL S ,|l?'7,708 !""refunds }iSo,"051 I|72,'J41 |terarH293,300
TfOSû~633,9341
"57I762T~l5,721
"ZTHn206,701
~R7~mTrv/v-i,i^ t
0,502 j
ttttt : :£3,8.:7 I
~'ζπ~τ·;π – Iy!iiuuu;' ; i
74,160 |
!!1.563 ,734
k i
Refunds *162,200 I–– : ~~4~ 1p3s74?|173,387
–– S558,197i
4,813 |~*■ïvj
78T«rW#A|V
0,176j
T^396~ j2P,/-o
155,716 [ÎTÏ55vôôT
Refunds onfood a^d,1979 j
* e._ ^ !I
I
! H- '– 1I1.789 11,636 |
i !! .
|0,917 |j
i14,342
KeTunab on iuuu aiuunuçi pic j
oce^in *"1program mes J3,851 !
1– 11,5044,7&8 jI -j
i" I: 1
4.373 i
II
I-' !
i "ôvTTi j– i\
S15,269
INTERVENTION . .I
» – -, 1.– jT- ftt/•ûr>a^:e>1n !11,657 |I9,094
I- –1)6,620 59s313 0,908 Ii123,697 ]0,326 |1
38,781 j18.464 379,056
lrlLUspVjICSLJWII W1 Ml j
'animal feed j
1!
iLJi-0.003 i1
.*» j\Z !~ i
!r !
i " i
1 P l1
~~I !
i-0,003
Production refunds forpotatoe I
starch ]
~''I12.999 I
15,770 6,138
!I22,812 S 37,719
Other production returns .
... i8,408 i
s – i.0.071 !– 125,253 j
1' ![28,088 i
i I0,053 j11,250 j
1i 1
!- i™ 1
13,747 i11.1–H
18,712 i105,532
"Aid for durum wheat ji~ 1
1––– iLui |7,286t–- 1rz i
!108,130 j.1
1- ■ !1 |
I115,416
Carryover payments !
=– : !j2S812 !
j_0,759I13,122[9,622 0,827 Ii – I
P,0?5 i2,203 j 29,6-10
Buying-in and subsequent operation ]
' 1-0,2545,265 j72,521 j!6,432 |
11
«
" i14,402
1 iI r–
10,231I
0,001 I
I-0,248I
I88,858 :
Special intervention measures .___2 |I- [-°.139rr- r––1!-0,139
Other intervention measures j
»–i– ■ 1.1 1 ,^.j|0,183 !
' 11 1L: II0,096
L _J1<547l
jo,028
L o,iTTj!0,018r» ■'■■■■ i
j j
i I1,963
I
VI
f

m;UA
Item' Lelqiuw Oenmirk
i !;jer"onyrpûnct .i
J1r18r-wji
.Italy jLuxer-
bourg\ether-
L?nds'Jnitec
Kingdotr |
IEEDT0TAL '"
,
RICE 0,7£5 !0,025 .1,741 0,446 39,360 0,509I0,039 42,908
REFUNDSI,0,CC4.0,025 |1,702 0,196i39,310 I°»459 I0,03° |i<1.755
Refunds|0,004 j
i-j0,025 1,7020,196 34,649 0,459 i0,039 37,074
Refunds onfoodaid,1979
J2,257 2,257
Refunds onfoodaidunder
nrpc«""-*infi T'o^rarrps1 ' ■:
!- !i"2,404» I}
I'2,404
INTERVENTIONS oje4 0,039|0,250!~ I0,050 II
■"!0,050 1,173
KIlKANDMILKPRODUCTS j302,767j.35i,2631418,566 !846,224I291,2001
27,930 |13,039 !|
924,673 ii343,791 IIi.52-2-,453-
REFUNDSI
•>95,802 |[211,487 |331,132 375,090 j183,450 !10,206 i5,194 i) :
|701,967.IS ; j
|73,575.!2.037,903 .
Refunds * '|i
135,757 -[211,487 196,502 !349,723 |169,411 ΐη,ΡΠΛ π,ίκαI
>75,4.I!71,062i|1.322,690
Refunds onfoodaidforskimmed
j>i,lk,1979 7,891," .1
II
I
14,516 0,543 "0,499 0,037
■■1,056
1a
•-24,582 .
Refunds onfood'aidforbutter
oil,1979
iI
5,202'! 5,4099,431 j
1
iI
*
"!
5,674.-I25,716
Refunds onfoodaidforskimmed
miIkunderoreceprlino programmen 26,393
\60,065 1,574 10,512 .--1
i4,694'6,050 0,831 110,124
Refundsonfoodaidforbutter |
oilundernrpcedinn pronrammps j20,554 54,6.10113,814 1
I'3,023
I !'.11,073 1,682 104,791
* '' ,
ν\I
KS>
r\J
î
• »;

mEUA
ITEM Belgium Cen^ark Germany France Ireland |Italy
I'Luxer !-
'Knjpg[.'ether-Ilands !United
Ki°r?de.t"• I–wn
EECTOTAL
INTERVENTION/SKIWMEDMILK |7C,5-9I115,312 709,347375,636|e3,7o:(0,7443,855 174,37ïi135,614 |1.671,307
Aidforfeedforcalves 17,720"I9,753235,663 300,531 15,317 1,931I
0,767 103,511 18,808 707,187
Aidforfeedforanimals
otherthancalves 3,676 6,225 7,859 2,660 0,043 I0,18319,91J52,783 93,342
Aidforliquidskimmed-milk
forcalves 25,649 39.505 50,057 3,0700,26?1,4610,1170,79ll4,265 125,182
Aidforliquidskimmed-milk i
feedforanimalsotherthan45,540 75,863 1,47518,998 1,820 2,633I30,534 I176,888
: CoAidforcasein
. 1Lves
6,678 45,131 67,16534,678 49,232 !4,760I207,644
Privatestorage!
Publicstorage anddisposal
measures 23,468 13,836 292,188-1,264'11,781 -4,471 2»,769-1,707!24,464 361,064 *
Foodafd
»-
Otherinterventions
INTERVENTION /BUTTER AND
CREAM 32,829 j[19,205|310,687 78,790 22,624 5,2413,656 jI 1
!48,93c108,535 !630.407
PrivateStorage12,547 0,46314,18^17,054 4,010 0,1340,340 24,655 I5,560 79,005ruoucstorage
20,282'4,4721
287,58d27,777 1,571 2,941 24,24527,671X396,545
Absorption ofbutterfats.14,270 8,91S33,929 17,043 5,1070,3751
75,304 154,947
rooaMia
OtherIntervent ions! "
1
I

ITEM |i
Belgium 1Denniark "Gerriany .|Francs.Ira'.ar.d
'l'taly Luxe"!- i
co'jrgK'ether-j
lar-csUnited i
KingdonmEUA
EECTOTAL
INTERVENTION /OTHlRMILKPRODUCT;0,356 j0,^66 !
Ij3,e<176,13:i
0,C5CI
I12./Î530,006j0,6968,1S8 I; ' ■'« 1■-,.m
32,338
Storageofcheese
– -- |4,704,| 12,4881 *
17,192
Distribution ofschoolmilk
rh"---■ 10,356 0,566 3,847 !1.427 I!0,c?0j !0,006 0,6968,158'■1 ■■■■».■» m
15,146
OtherInterventions
i~_i 'I
i"■"I-j i1 ,■ ,,....«
Othermeasures inthemilkand
milkproductssector ^2,130 9,2971 -
44,996 15,368 1,631
■C.307 4,05111,478M»–!■ II■■ «
89,2^
Non-marketing andconversion
premiums■2,1309,297 j
j44,996 15.368 1,631 0,307 4,05111,478 8?,2#
Othermeasures •'■I1-- i
jj*
Financial participation by
milkproducers" r- I,. ■■■. 1-3,565-5,352-25,463-20,600 j-4,744 j"I-8,232-0,250-12,271 I-13,687■I■■11 »•
.-94,164
r.*pencmure topromote the
expension ofthemarketinmilk
.gndmilkproducts »4,6963,748 45.-J9S12,430r1–"
4,4487,483 0,270 6,92325,118 110,314
MarketdevelopmentI.2,16^' 2,6538,519 I.6,929 1,995 3,872 0,259 4,027r6,997■ –m
37,416
Distribution ofschoolmilk0,7151,095 j7,694 j2,721 0,181 '0,011 1,397116,22311 ■111. 1 1-■■■■m
30,027
Disposalforbutter.fat
'1,203 2$,058 j
10,036» 1"I0,008 0,113 27,398
■improvement ofmilkquality0,613 I
: I2,947 j2,7442,272 j3,611 j 1,5011,785 15,473
Othermeasures . "|i■■j
"" |
I

mEUA
ITEM
|BelgiunDenmark Germany France Ireland Italyjuxem -
oourgMether-
andsUnited
KingdomEEC TOTAL
OILS AND FATS!2,323
i1.999 8S,:ooj84,7521394,065 I 3,836 30,582 605,966
REFUNDS /OLIVE OIL | 0,006 0.001 I IÔTÔÔTI 0.0!?
INTERVENTION /OLIVE OIL I2,1S1 I I335.923 Irrn ôTïcTi v°.aî?7
AID l1.5P5 i 0loi ^7786
Storage 22,597 22,597
Other interventions
^11■■ -■■■ ■MLTTIMTTl'T -I■Ml )111 ■lllllll "win ■-0,646 j 7,148 I 7J94
r\crui^g / SUN~I
FLOl/ERSEECS0,856 ! 0,314 j-0,^01 j 1,171
INTERVENTION "" " " ||0,242 ||1,991 I87,253 ]!72,437 I 7,805 I 2,037 I30,773 202,565
production aid I|0,228 jj1,763 87,253[72,487 I 7,805 I2,c: |30,734 I 202,307
Storage0,014 0,228 0,039 0,281
Other Intervent ions - i r^–\
Intervention /other seeds|2,081 ||0,008 m
1I10,1013 J j0,336 1,465 14,018
a1oiur cotton seeds i
t . 1- 1^1 I°.»3 I 0,333
Aid tor soya seed |
^ 1'1AJJ""J1J"2I-, r1 1 ■ ^I- i 1,299 0,001 r~– I Î7300 .
seea 1
[2,081 jI0,008 j8,609 1,435 i 12,383
Miatorotner oilseeds j 1 0,0021
0,002
1
ν/1

mEUA
ITEMIsel.g'i'jni jOenmark Germany France Ireland Italy Luxe-i -
Jourg\ether-
laidsr– 1
I.mtea 'jEcCt:t;l
SUGAR !182,310 j
I –37,484 160,66 ! 428,059 I7,176 1[ i
I29.479 .1■' ;
«3,137 I11.US -!<3\q £.-? '
REFUNDS /SUGAR162,108 j27,483 j96,997 j345,124 J,265 !0,00743,122 j|7,013 îr«5,n9
Refunds I|162,10827,483 i96,996 j345,124 3,265 0,007 43,122 »J: 1
7,013 Ii ,
I605,113
Refunds onfood aid,1979 |– ; |_ '!
I
1– ;
Refunds onfood aidunder |
preceding progra mmes j0,001!–
0,001
irue rvenit ion/sugar
Tin iI "20,202 10,001'63,664 |I82,935 3,911 29,472 20,065 24,433 254,653
Denaturing premiums i0,079 1,435 0,611 I0,0091
0,164 Ii0,009 2,307
Refunds for use inchemical
industry ' 0,185 0,199 0,628 0,494 0,580 0,736 3,122
Keimoursement ofstorage costs j19,938 .9,802 I– ; 161,601 *73,757 3,902 29,472 19,021[22,489 I240,012
Public storage j– _n^
Measures for sugar produced in
French overseas departments 8,043 ! 1,199 9,242
Sugar import subsidy | - I
Other interventions ji -- ■ I
/
01
0
1

1
ITEM |fcoIgi
B>î"ikv-irlrk|p^,.ach-|pr.J,ce
l1="••*'IIrelandy.,.TLuj:ba-Italia I,
jKeder-
lar.4Unitci
/Clng"io3mcua
TotalCC3
BEEF.ANDVEAL' -j12,652|49.923|233,678j106,£46138,493 1136,039|-145,807 22,171 743,219
REFUNCS J9,700|5.1O.'Q
4107,164|
_i.42,21140,012|2,533| 35,106 i8,534 270,209
Refunds i9,700|24,949|107,164j42,211J40,012j2,533j 35,106
J!8,534 270,209
Refundsor,foodaid,1979 |
.1
•I– i
Intervention /storage2,952J24,^60J126,560j&4,235|93,48$|;73,190j 13,701 j1 –
}13,046 |417,150
Privatestorage 4|2;9660,803j!9,539J1
9,313i!5,623 j4,819j 0,5635,434i[39,310
"Publicstorage j
|!-0,014JI
24,177j116,971 54,922 |
I–J92,663 68,371 13,1*3|7,612
. .377,840
OtherinterventionsLJ1
j-otooi !
L..~..1.- ..
L-I-0,046 J!L_JI
j60,316-j!0,591 60,860
Aidforsoci.ii.security j
.recipients _____ 1
Premiums fororderly marketvI»
! ._]_ j
l' i
!-.J-0,001 i
"54",1Ô9~1-1.0,046 !
j :S ■!
11* I i0,591 0,544
Premiums forreconstitution0
ftf.ds.
sI.r–
i60,316 60,316
Otherinten/encions. j j!1:r
1-i.
1l!- i"-
PICf-îtiAT S3,478]s,940
i :I.10,906[1,55818,221 0,025 10,848j1,074104,859
REFUNDS [2=509[53,563|3,870j7,519j1,435î1^206 7,758 0,519F73,384
INTERVENTIONS
j5:965j1,241S5î070I3.337 0,123j7^0150,025
.3,090 0,555 26,475
EGOS/POULTR YMEATj2,530j5,691I13,035
ît[36,806
I
Ir-– ■
l-j0,129 [15,127|4,953
179,473
REFUNDS ONEGGSj0,629
!j0,330
ijc4o•0,763 0,111L-7,294 1,113 15,929
REFUNDS ONPOULTRY MEAT<
1,901j6,3611
j^55136,040t
0,018 7,933■>fi'OJI63,544
v-n
-Ni

mEUA
ITEM .|Belgium Denmark Germany FranceIrelandj|ItalyLuxen-|
bourgINether
lands ,■United
<ingdonEÎCTOTAL
FRUIT/VEGETABLES[M59 1,072 6,254 66,837 0,107I
!339,909 .i 19,830 1,970 442,?53
REFUNDS 'I0,085 1,072 0,5.84 6,-1930,05:22,797 ■>fl\° ■1,635 !34,535
Refundsonfreshfruitandweg.i0,0530,573;0,441'5,961 19,6741I.1
j1,524I0,001 28,227
KeTunds onproducts processed
fromfruitandvegetables 0,032 0,499 0,143 0,5320,051 3,123 •0,294 1,634 6,303
INTERVENTION /Freshfruitand |
vegetables |6,774 5,670 9,5160,056 83,045 18,012 ,0,335 123,408
Withdrawl andbuying-in
6,7741
_ 14,360 9,4070,056 45,295 18,012 0,335 84,239
Processing anddistributionr1,310.iO.COi i i0.002
Promotion ofcitrusfruits
0,108 8,024\'8,132
Processing ofcitrusfruits
29,724 29,724-
Otherinterven-t ions II
I-'!
I
INTERVENTION /PROCESSED gRODUCTS50,848 234,067j284,915
Aidtortinnedpineapple
■ L _!'2,586 2,586 ,
Premiums fortheprocessing of
,fruitandvegetables48^262 234,067
i282,329
v-n
00

• -%
mEUA
ITEM Belgium Denmark Germany "France IrelandItaly Luxem­
bourgNether­
landsUnited
KingdomEECTOTAL
WINE 0,001 0,914 35,523 25,493I
I61,921
REFUNDS 0,001 I0,107 1,574 !2,954i4,635
INTERVENTIONS 0,607 25,025 _22,5391
' –
Privatestorage0,195 14,116 8,221I22,532
Aidforre-storage oftable
wines 0,001 I.1,637 I 0,2771.915
Distillation 0,611 I0,105I
13,783II- ! 14.490
Aidforconcentrated wine
musts 9,163 "* !
I- . ,
9,163
Otherintervention -0,010 0,004 0,258– i 0,252
Otherexpenditure JL:U I-8.924 I L...~ 1r~– i!0rto»
Obligatory distillation ofby­
products ofwinemaking 8,924] I!
8,924
.•
TOBACCO 2,987 17,822 79,041 125,593 !0,004 i9PÇ./M7
REFUNDS 0,019 0,373 3,283 0,004 IL '■-»-»'
I3,679
INTERVENTIONS jI2,903 17,82278,668 I I122,310 In~im7«
Premiurns . ||2,968| [17,622178,668 I I109,2591rm !I?OP,.717
Storager–'■•■■-■–
!12,530~T~ 1
I^1„ fIAI f..
12,530 ..
Otherinterventions | 0,521 0,521 •
I
0
1

nËUA
ττε?ι |jlGfr'.jny .|France ]
i,_!Ireland"!Italyi
i , !|Luxer>-
!b'_>urojNether-j'.ends IIijnited
!Kinbc'omJjEECTOTAL
ftL'QHOL ." i-
Ι"-!•'-n
REFUNDS - 'I--|Jl~ ! : j–– 1
INTEPVtNTIOKiS I_
L–. [~-■i!i.r~f...i.m* ilrm
OTHER CO.'if'.ON C>:-A'JI?A-'I0' ;S 'ί_Ζα£11_ί 12,066I
i. :rc-tc-MI7.0*2' !Ic.r:o|)-iI7Q Ir^n !-•
INTERVENTION /FLAXANi>HEMP \
" ■ ■ I,, , ''1-.852.j j0,010|13.6i5 j
i ! 8,92 jr-'11,046 j0,179 ■17,6*3;
,INTERVENTION /,fibrerlax
•1,832 j 0,010 ji10,938 | 0,848 | 1,046'0,179 ]14,905
Intervention /hemp . |
•, i_ j;2,701-i– ..i
j
i10»°44 jI
■!_■■i2,m
;SEEDS . jI1,042 ||■10,205J2,306[6,730 |f0,126 j!0,099 i0,024]f5,2904~i57i 30,101
HOPS .UiWJL_-_JL7»39'10,3:3jI0,024 !rr-^i–r~~i 2,079 i10,145»'
•SlLKiJORMS
I !L-jL•!0,010 jn--10,443 !rmrrn 0./-3}
DEHYDRATED FODDER j
!0r139j
t !«,53l|~1
|2,252[24^964 :0,394 4,908: 1
j3,469..j3*890'.·46,587
POTATOES -
–, l~ ir-iTj
•SH£ETf4EAT , I
■– !j "––j,j
i** II
1"
PEASANDFIELDBEANS
i3,166 II
-0,245 j0,964^–,–«.II».»|IU^.|
I1,448 j jOJOO 0,002 8,374 !0,394H15,313_
OTHERS , -L-J
REFUNDS ONGOODSOBTAINED FROM
-PROCESSING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT :!18,545
r •.
<32,24538,156 22,425
\19,065 11,825 O.OS?67,908 41,900
II252,153
«. ' • •' *
" " '· ■ '' '*' ' ' 1

ITEMj
Belgium j__ p-–r-– j– , ■■– •r'Denmark ''Germany France Ireland iItaly .>_jxem-
_ J L – Lr ? ~*
(Nethei –iunitedlands ÎKinado .?|EEC TOTAL
FISHERIES 0.3H jQ,^8S ji3,321 j
L ii1.862 I
I j}0,496 J3,232j |"'""I
|4,348 j2,249 |17,007
REFUNDS j
■'0,05 ?|
I .I■-n|0^20 j.1,1Si j0,186 j0,036 -j-|_ j4,003*"|!2,705 3,508 .
INTERVENTIONS • ; I0,257 J
1j0,265 |i2,140 iU. _!|1,676 |Of440 |3,232 |!
*** i
l0,345 10,144 1f"8,499
Withdrawals andb'jying-in j0,257 Ι
ίi0,265 ji2,140 ;1s676 ;I0,440 3,232 !
S I __L-J0,345 |A *A iVsa.4 j 8,499
Private storage j
Ii
«. ji- . I
U-–-!–| " !JL" ji ]
!- -!
Other interventions1- L" ■ !– 1 S- 1!
1-
ALLSECTORS [724,8 j>297„463TPTOOT^S['.64,365fnSS^msl 13,6sTTl 276,103!570,996 9.732,048
! I 1~ ! I „l_ I 1. .i 1

mE'JA
ITEM ■ .Belgium
/Denmark' iGermany |lFrance Ireland IItaly j:>ourgNether­
landsr
Jn11edjKingdo ^I\
EEC TOTAL
ACCESSION COMPENSATORY AMOUNTS
*■0,095 0,003 -0,012
.T
'0,006 '0,104 0,15^
"MONETARY COMPENSATION Af"0UN T3j!60,939 1123,167 )192,868 j77,922 1108,S2S-35,06sj -0,143 )218,2^.1-43,12 -j 708,<26
MCAs ON INTRA -COMMUNITY TRADE !37,485 128,167' 71,856 !77,562 L108,333j-35,695] II70.27S j 433,785
MCAs onimports paid byimport­
ing Member States -23,845." I-308,021 ■115,442j
0J31 Ij ■2,741 -0,511-23,63OJ j2,882j[-239,^11
MCAs onimports paid byexport -
Member States ,•33,326 :128,167: ]
143,832 1197,141 !116,880 :0,015I
117,351 j0,214 j736,926
MCAs Onexports paid byexport 1
Member Statesn%8,004I
J236,0.15 -235,021I
-9,2^8 -38,639 0,317 81,557 -101,965' -38,930
MCAs on,EXTRA COMMUNITY TRADE I23,504 j121,012
!0,360 0,142J0,6330,036 48,006|55,743249,641
PORTION OF MCAs OVER AND'ABOVE
LEVY
' N0,382 0,142 - 0,833
î ;\ ,
j55,743! 57,ÎC5
-!-•
MCAs PAID ON EXPORTS
23,504 121,012 -0,022ml'.0,036 48,006 ,j'192,536
x■" 11 – 1 ■ 1 1 :––
" · 1
/GRAND TOTAL (i) f:|7RS,9?n757,viT?i.vO,T!9 IV2,â 961τΐ20,Ώ ?.13,538 U94,3S 7527,375 |10.440,^73
GRAND TOTAL corrected onthe
basis ofArticle 2aofReg.974/71752,6 .629,2
I ■ .:|2i4,5'5'■2281,2j456,01656,5 . 13,3
!
1]1377,0 92S,4 10.440,7
(1)Without taking into account corrections relating -tothebreakdown ofecpenditure byMember State 'under thesystem whereby
theexporting Member State pays MCAs fortheimporting Member State inintra-Community trade .Amounts paid under this
system areentered ontheline "MCAs onimport "under thename oftheMember State making thepayment .Forthese correct ions,
seeTable 4,page 19andcerrected grand total . \ <- - •

ANNEX 2
EAGGf GUARANTEE EXPENO iTURE BYSECTOR 1
SECTOR 19'5
CEREALS
Refunds
Intervent ion$ .ofwhich :
•production refund
aid for durum wheat
-storage
«ICE
Refunds
Intervent ioni
Mil KANO MILK PROOUCTS
Refunrtj
Intervent ioni
aid for skimmed miik
storage ofskimmed milk
storage otbutter
-disposal ofbutter
-finane iatparticipation bymilk producers
expansion ofthemarkets
ORS ANO FATS
Refunds
Intervent ionj ofwhich ;
-aid foroliveoil
-aidforcolza ,rape andsunflower seeds
SUGAR
Refunds
Intervent ioni .ofwhich :
reimbursement ofstorage cos?s
BEEF AND VEAL '
Refunds
Intervent ionj ofuhieh:589,3
3,4
1.195,7
187,8119.9
259,4
2,8
0,4
331,4
862,3
271,290,6
103,1
65,0
923,3606,8
55,9
151,2
38.6
0,5
187,3
15r,7
28,3
27,8
243,4
94,7
145,9
HtA1976
455,9
403,3
252,6
18,4
18,2
0,2
2.277,7
765,6
1.512,1
24/,1
10,i
236,3
-•29,3
62,0
16.',3
15J,6
482,351,2
82,8
118,2
755,5
520,4
215,1
31,0
128,/
92,8
141.A6/9,9
13,5
2.924,1
268,5
598,41977 1978 1979
9 1.112,5 1.563,7
365,6
264,3
76,4
134,8
52,4831,9
280,6
117,0
89,0
72,31.184,7
379,1
143.3
115.4
88,9
5
13,3
0,217,9
16,8
1,142,9
41,7
1,2
1 4.014,6 4.527,5
1.417,4
1.506,7
853,1
310,0
274,3
81,51.565,0
2.449,6
1.131,7
682,1
506,1
112,82.087,9 -
2ASi,S
1.310,2
361,1
475,6
169,3
,5-24,1
324,8156,1
49,9
606,0-94,2
■110,3
1.0
267,5
161,4
84,90,1
324,7
143,6
131,01,2
604,8
357,8
202,3
,4878,0 939,8
409,1
189,3
1//,640,4
237,6
■227,9685,1
254,7
240,0
,7638,7 748,2
15',1
515,6■145,4
493,3270,2
478,0

ANNEX 2'continued (2)
,
1
•public arjprivate storage
calving pi-r.niu»5
PIGMEAT
Refunds
Interventions56,9
40,7
16,2*0?,<
88,1
II
29,0
M,7
4.3347,7
46,6
37,3
?9.)
8,0?VD,5
41,1
*5,0
3?,2
12,8413.C
76,î
104,9
78,*
76.5*17,;
60,;
IEG6S ANOPOULTRY MEAT (Refunds ) 9.* is.i 75.6 38,1 79,5-
FRUIT AND VEGETABLES
Refunds
Intervention ^ofwhich :
-fresh gruit andvegetables
~processed fruit andvegetables72,6
28,6
*4,0
**,C185,1
*3,8
141,3
1*1,3178,?
50,0
128,2
12*,é
3,6100,7
*7,8
52,9
*9,1
3,8«42,9
34,5
*08,*
423,i
284,9
WINE " '
Refunds
Intervention *,ofwhich :
private storage aid
•distillation1*1,3
0,2
1*0,9
36,5
104,4133,8
1.5
129,7\
38,7
88,689,9 "
1.1
«1.3
35,6
*4,5«3.7
1,6
52.3
35,3
10,961.9
4,6
57,3
77.5
14,5
Obligatory distillation ofby-products ofwine-naking
TOBACCO 'a f ■ . '0,2
200,5 185,* 205,27.5
216,1 225,*8,9
Refunds
Intervent ions
' .-♦ ■1.3
199,2,1.7
183,7*.3
200,97,7
213,43,7
221,7
Ifisheries I 10,0 11.0 8.8 15,* 17,0
IOTHER PRODUCTS (Intervention )••Ii– 1–
I •
Intervention },ofwhich :
•flaw and heap
-Seeds ' ^
-hops .
~silk worms V
•dehydrated fodder -58,8
1*,*
24,6
7,8
0,6
11,476,2
20.3
2*,1
16,0
0,*
15.456,6f•
.".5
18,1
9,9
0.3
13,891.2
.15,*
70,3
11.1
0,5
*2,6120,2■·»·\
17,6
30,1
10,1
0,5
*6,6
I"refundsfornon-annexIIprocessedfoods 23,9 67,0 136,3 208,5 • 252,1
|TOTAL AGRICULTURAL EXPENDITURE 3.742,1 4.746,9 ρ.640,0 '.765,2 >.732,0
o>«
•v
OD
τ
m
Z

• ANNEX2-continued (3)
I
Accession compensatory amounts 444,8 402,0 201,1 »,2 1.1
IMonetary compensatory amounts «5,4 433,2
I989,1«80.3 708,« I
TOTAL EXPENDITURE EAGGF GUARANTEE SECTION <..522,5 5.587,1 6.830,4.–
8.472,7 10.440,7
Theexpenditure Istaken from thestatements bytheMember States under thesystem under thesystem ofadvances andcharged toeach financial year inaccordance with
Article 109ofthefinancial Regulation ,

BREAKDOWN OFEXPENDITURE 8Y_ECONOMIC CAFEGORT -1979 FINANCIAL YEAR (a)
SECTOR JTotal
^ipenditure./
R»
' ■- * ]•p«Mown according toeconomic
f " • *'*– ..nEllA
eatpgorv ofooerations *1 \
export
refui«J »
»INTERVENTION
Storage(i ) jWithdrawl
"ifni >tni
coarat ;
'e |Price compensa­
tor/«tcA<uresGuidance
premiumsTOTAL
b ~ C I |• f 9 ]h=d*e*f+9 1
A. Cereals •
Rice
Milk products ,ofwhich :
-skimmed milk
-butter1.565,7
42,9
4.527,5
N/A,
N/A1.18(1,7
4i,7
?.087,9
N/A .
M/aI
\
851,8
361,1
475,6■290,1 (2)
1,2
1.496,5 (3)
1.310,2
154,989,3(4 ).379,0
1.2
2.439,6
1.671,3
630,5
Oils andfats,ofwhich :
•olive oil
-colza ,rape and sunflower seeds
Sugar
Beef and veal
Pigmeat
Eggs andPoultry neat606,0
388,2
217,J
939,8
748,2
•104,9
79,51,2
1,2
685.1
270.2 f
?8,4
79,522,6
0,3
240,0 (5)
417,2581,9
365,6
202,3
14,7
0,5 -
26,5
- /V. -
60,3(6 )604,8
388,2
202,6
254,7
478,0
26,S
Fruit andvegetables
Wine
Tobacco N442,9
61,9
225,534,5
4,6
Î,?22,5
12,584,2
23,7(8 )324.2 (>)
11,1 (9)
209.3408,4
57,3
221,8
Other products (10)ofwhich :
~flax and hemp
-seeds137,2
. 17,Ï
30,'8,5 (10)(10)
8,5V 120,2
17,7
30,1128,7
17,7
30,1
I -•dehydrated fodder 46,1• ~I46,q -«6,6
I Refunds onprocessed non-Annei IIproducts •'252,2 I 252,2 -
TOTAL A
o/o(«>9.732,1
1004.732,2
48,61.657,8
17,0116,4
-'-Z3.076,2
31,6149,6
1,5
0.Accession compensator /amounts 0,2 °'2
'
C«Monetary compensatory amounts s
|"intra-Community trade 458,8 45B,8 458,8
I ~trade withthird countries » •249,6j249,6* ' " '
GRAND TOTAL
o/o(0.440,7
' 1O04.931,8 1.657,8
15,9116,4
1'13.535,2
33,9I
149,6
<«>forfootnotes seene*t page.

FootnotestoAnnex3
**
(1)Privateandpublicstorage.Detailsofexpenditure onstoragearegiveninAnnex4.
(2)Including production refunds (143.3mEUA)&aidfordurumwheat(115.4mEUA).
(3)Thisamounttakesaccountoftheco-responsibility levycharged (94.2mEUA).
(4)Premiumsforthenon-marketing ofmilkandfortheconversion ofdairyherdstobeefandveal
production .
(5)Reimbursement ofprivatestoragecosts.
(6)Calvingpremiumstopromotetherestocking ofherds.
(7)Promotion ofCommunitycitrusfruit(8.1mEUA)+processing ofCommunitycitrusfruit
(29.7mEUA)+intervention inrespectofprocessedproducts (286.4mEUA).'
(8)Includingobligatorydistillation ofthaby-products ofwine-making (8.9mEUA)+ 1
distillation (14.5mEUA). ' &
(9)Aidforthere-storage oftablewines(1.9mEUA)andaidforconcentrated winemusts
(9.2mEYA). ,
(10)Includingfisheries (17mEUA),towhichtheamountsincolumns(c)and(e)refer.
(11)Thepercentages inbracketsarebasedonthetotalagricultural expenditure (totalA).
• ίo
σ­ο\
ΟοΟ
I

ANNEX4
Breakdown ofintervention inrespectofstoragecostsinthe1979financial year
~ /mEUA
» .**
o
Private
storagePubLicStorage
i– •ofwhich m
ISectori i
Technical costs■ ",
,iFinancial costs •
i
1.Difference between\
buying-in and
[sellingprices ,
m% i
»* *–""*m™^*
:Cereals . i
i
• \• *» î
:- ;
► fl» '' .■' \
: 88,8 Ji ;
:37,7 Îî <
!29/6 :► »
!21,5 s
4
5Mi11^andmilkproducts !
m
S .4• 4
:7?,-:
► i:744,9 i
i: s
t62,5 :: ' !
:105,9 :» •
:576,5(1)ï
«
SOilsandfats •
• 4• α
:ρ.η.:
» *» l
:22,8/ ]t «
;11,5 :1 i•" ■ ■
!8,3 :»- •
» •
!3,0 s
«
:Sugar .:240,-!■-v.i» «
*s «
► m a
»' 4» 4
» I
»' *m 4
►- «i «i
I , ©
» o
► •
2Beefandveal ;
•••" c:39,3!
' «i 1
377,9 ]: ■ :
i69,5 :» «
î38,1 ::270,3\•
«'Pigmeat ;
• 'ms26,5!, a
: i
» •• •• '!
l * ; '«Ï .'I 4
* 4
» ' '4I Ο
► ·
» « 4
► V ·
(
"Wine :
« ,• «
:22,5; - .i :» <
► a
» mm' ■■'*
* i► •
* •
I .• 4» '•
» ©
-«
sTabacco «
4: •î .:
;-•12,6 -..sî .i
2,4 s► ', 4
:4,5 :» o
* •
» 57 •» Jyi a
ïTOTAL
4:407,3.S1.247,0 •■j» "*"™ ™*""*"™.J
:183,6 :•■– ■ITHHBPII mMmI
:186,4 :: ;877,0 :
RpomiL''36^!3''onf/^o6S^°rt'16mar'<ft1'n9ofmilkproductsontheinternalmarketunderArticles6and12of
•,*u1C>r°"•(welfarebeneficiaries ,armedforces,non-profit organizations ,Christmasbutter}andout-sidetheCommunity . '

ANNEX 5
(1)Quantity and value ofproducts in .public storaae
i
!
*ProductSituation asat31.12.1978|Situation asat31.12.1979 I
>
Quantity (tonnes )i
!Value (m EUA) iQuantity (tonnes ) •Value"
!(m EUA )
ICommon Wheat II
j1.050.778î
Ii
182,315 ] 1.877.9191
I 322,653
|Barley I
i •... \! 181.895
!I
!
829,338 73.567?12,224
îRye .^ Ij 600.782 109,041 581.956t
2 108,748
jDurum wheat j 150.466I
a27,015 142.727 .I
a 27,783
|Skimmed-mi Ikpowder -. j 721.8278
I 680,090 jI 214,8598
»5
230,774
SButter 258.100?
3
S572,068 | 293.285S
8
I723,325 S
IOlive oil |
.j 104.895 106,225 |!; 53.401 62,46
IColza / *.|! 820I
a0,272 10.236S
!
î
l
.«
83,526
Beef (carcasses )
Boned beef
Preserved beefI 135.917
79.362
37.0900
S
1
»
î226,908 |
190,598 |
67,167203.415
84.469
2.770383,084
206,232
5,714
jTobacco j 21.617?
8
...J42,151 | 28.092
j *I
I
s55,980
|TOTAL <" |J2233,1 8 |i
J 2142,511 j
(1)Thefigures inEUAwere calculated byapplying totheamounts given innational currency the -budgetary
rates which applied iorthepurposes ofconverting into EUAtheexpenditure forDecember

-69- Vi/1o9/30"EN
ANNEX6
breakdown ofintervention exoenditur-s intheforrcofprice
comcensat ionaids
mEUA
ISector (Production–r■ :-aid.{Processing a\aITotal.–,
!
ICereals |290,1>
i
I
Rice 1,2 S !.1,2•^ ?
i
Milkproducts,ofwhich:
-skimmed milk
-butter '488,3
154,91.008,2
1.008,2(I)l»49^t>
1.008,S:
154,9
Oilsandfats,ofwhich":
-oliveoiI
-colza,rapeandsunflower seeds581,9
365,6
202,3••»581,9
365,<5,
202,3'
ISugar i■"»* 3,1(2) 14,7
IBeefandveal !°.5 ~ '!°«5
!Pigmeat i25,5 v i'2^5
IEggsandpoultrymeat ]- - '■
1Fruitandvegetables 8.2 (3) j324,2
.
IWine "|u,i - u,i
I'Τβϋδεοο ^ ]!-■■ I209,3
Otherproducts ofwhich: !
-flaxa.idhemp
-seeds
-dehydrated fodder ''73,6
17,7
30,2•46,6
-46,S
J120,2
17,7
30,2
46,6
TOTAL A 1.702,5 1.373,9I
3.076,4 |
MCAsforintra-Community trade
1458,8I ■
i" 453,8
GrandTotal ' -jj2®l6l,3
■?
1.373,? 3-535,2
Aidinrespectofskimmedmilkpowderforanimalfeed(calvesandotheranimals )
andaidinrespectofskim.ned miIkprocessed -tofarmcasein.
Refundfortheuseofsugarinthechemicalindustry ,.
Processing anddistribution offruitandvegetables withdrawn fromthemarket,
financial compensation fortheprocessing ofcitrusfruit,aid''ortinned .
pineapple aridpremiumsfortheprocessing offruitandvegetables ..

VI/169/80–EN
YearANNEX7
OverallcostoftheGuaranteeSectioninrelationtogrossdomesticproduct(GDP)
EAGGFGuarantee expenditure
(•000mEUA)
Gross Minusagricultural leviesCommunity .grossdomestic
productatmarketprices
('000mEUA)EAGGFGuarantee expenditure
as%ofCommunity GDP
Gross
e=100b/dNet
f=100c/d
1975
1976
1977
1978
19794,523
5,587
6,830
8,673
10,4403,903
4,414
4,692
6,390
8,2971.107,6
1.265,6
1.405,0
1.553,2
1.742,00,41
0,44
0,49
0,56
0,600,35
0,35
C,33
0,41
0,48
-si
O

VI/169/80-EN
l?6ô/69
19£9/70
1970/71
1371/72
1972/73
1973/74
Ï9KA5
197S»/76
1976/77
1977/78
Î973'7?mV^JMWXANNEX8
EQUALIZATION OFSTORAGECOSTSFORSUGAR
A.COMMUNITY SUGAR
SugarYear|Totallevies'
(EUA)Totalrefunds
(EUA)
53-636.855,20
53.952-512,72
57.09ô.210,U
cO.3'v9.608f48
75-327.163,45
£4.163.399,00
86.246.259,30
50.520.439«5.6
166.395.251,26
192.770.057,4?I190.733.254 .?0
U2.l».mvUlJA
•·Β.52.85c.932,20
57.776.026,'il
53.637.434,.je
76.661.531,28
75.062.779,39
76.632.993,96
8l.d05.7S9.55
332.76>5C1 ,04
153.C19.70C.1C
190.733.254 \20Annual balance
otute T~%(a)Situatìon at15Aprii,1980»
Cumulative balance
absolute aosolute%(a)
767.9?3,CO
-3.S23.513.89
3.240.775,66
3.0/3.277,20
2di.334.06
7.535.3*3,04
5.240.479,75
-42.245.063 ,04
♦•13.370.581,18
♦2.036.803,29
1577/78
1978/798.404.171,31
8.279*732,50fi.0c?.069,20
6.142.093.50PREFERENTIAL SUGAR
♦396.102,11I
♦2.137.639.00 I♦1,43
97,09
♦5.68
♦4,60
♦.0.35
♦'8,95
♦6,06
♦46,67
♦8,04
♦1,06
♦3.03–muniraMutΤ
♦
4-
♦►767.S23.00
-3-055.590,89
♦185.184,77
♦3.853.461,97
♦4.147.846,03
♦11.633-245,07
♦16.923.724,82
-25.321.338,22
-11.9-2.757,04
-9.903.933,75-1.8",0.QaT,C1,43
■2,84 .
•C„ll
►1.58.
»1,29
»2,89
♦3.45
«4,36
-1,60
-1,05
-C.ié
♦4,71
♦25,82v;395.102,11
♦2.533.741,11♦4,71
♦15,19Duratv
fstcr
(month"" 1
^or^jraqeI
hs)J
5.63
6,13
5,33
5,93
5,ai
4,&o
4.64
6,23
5,99
5,83
„lvtU
2,26
i,«i
(a)%oflevies

AHHII 9
GUARANTEE SCIHOIT ADVANCES AND FUNDS AVAILABLE INK^BER STATE :,FOR 19/9
Date of
&Ç.ri.5!nft
19.1Z.78
18.01.79
15.02.79
19.01.79
06.0t.79
17.04 .79
O?.05.79
08.05.79
11.05.79
17.05.79
08.06.79
15.04.79
17.07.79
30.07 .ƒ9
11.09.79
14.09.79
17.10.79
05.12.79
Total advancesBELGIUM
BTR
?.800.000 .
2.280.000 ,
2.300.000 .
3.050,000 ,
800.000 .
3.400.000 .
870.000 ,000,-
000 >-
000,-
000,-
000,-
000,-
000,-
fcw*il<jblfe funds
at..1.Jao-lfi Z5^_
Funds «tvaiUbU
asaresult of'
clearance of
1973 accounts an <
judgement ofthe
Court .concerning
Total available
funds
rotai InEUA
(1)3.700.000.000,-
3.500.000.000 ,-
2.100.000.000,-
3.100.000.000 ,-
500.000.000 ,"
1.271.000.000 ,-
1.671.000.000 ,-
31.342.000.000 ,-
169.180.037 ,-
*38.728.645 ,-
cleacance.of acu
11.549.908.682 ,-
788.436.280,47SENNAPK
DM
553.000.000 ,-
345.000.000 ,-
468.000.000 ,-
422.000.000,-
403.000.000 ,-
100.000.000 ,-
465.500.000 ,-
600.000.000,-
424.000.000 ,-
406.500.000 ,-
70.000.000 ,-
530.000.000 ,-
205.400.000 ,-
337.055.514,12
5.329.455.514,12
61.407.678,01
-3.205.773,62
Uftt*for..l2ZJ /ii
5.387,657.418,51
759.188.994,41GERIANY
DM
570.000.000 ,-
542.000.000 ,-
481.000.000 ,-
466 .0001 000,-
563.000.000 ,-
S56.000.000 ,-
670.000.000 ,-
621.000.000 ,-
555.000.000 ,-
463.000.000 ,-
78.100.000 ,-
558.000.000 ,-
6.123.100.000 ,-
-38.024.823,58
-27.032.245,77rhANCf
1.472.000.000 ,-
1.120.000.000 ,-
1.025.000.000 ,-
1.400.000.(100 ,"
1.288.500.000 ,-
1.383.500.000 ,-
840.000.000 ,-
1.282.000.000 ,-
1.180.000.000 ,-
1.550.000.000 ,-
97.700.000 ,-
1.291.000.000 ,-
13.929.700.000 ,-
237.263 .7S5,73
♦47.618.548,73
6.058.042.930,6ί-Μ4 .214.602 .304,46
2.408,841.890,59 2.443.1 70.292,26CLANO
1*1-.
35.000.000 ,-
2V.500.000 ,"
18.000.000 ,-
16.500.000 ,-
34.500.000 ,-
23.000.000 ,-
30.000.000 ,-
35.500.000 ,-
38.000.000 ,-
43.000.000 ,-
11.800.000 ,-
45.500.000 ,-
380.300.000 ,-
3.265.782,56
♦20.773,63
572.421 .510,2*1iTALY
LIT
.70.0*00.000.000 ,-
100.000.000.000 ,-
130.000.000.000 ,-
95.000.000.000 ,-
230.000.000.000 ,-
5o.ooo.ooo.ooo
225.000.000.000 ,-
190.000.000.000 ,-
160.000.000.000 ,-
170.000.000.000 ,-
69.000.000.000 ,"
Π*89.000.000.000,-
-8.895.699.429 ,-
-578.454.458 ,-
385.586.556,1SU.479.525.846.113 ,-
1,305.700.042.33LUXT»T40U3G
UR
36.050.000 ,-
86.000.000 ,-
20.000.000 ,-
134.000.000 ,-
46.000.000 ,-
ioo.ooo.ooo ,-
37.000.000 ,-
23.000.000 ,-
14.000.000 ,-
32.000.000 ,-
528.000.000 ,-
2.435.823 ,-
-2.326.038 ,-
528.109.785 ,-
13.151.298,47NTTHERL /.'OR .
HFL
320.000.000 ,-
350.000.000 ,-
288.000.000 ,-
350.000.000 ,-
120.000.000 ,-
310.000.000 ,-
350.000.000 ,-
90.000.000 ,-
315.000.000 ,-
440.000.000 ,-
485.000.000 ,-
320.000.000 ,-
222.900.000 ,-
285.000.000 ,-
4.245.900.000 ,-united KINGDOM
UKL
-50.380.333,65
♦23.108.026.05
4.218.627.692,40
1.539.258.468,5633.000.000 ,-
24.000.000 ,-
32.000.000 ,-
35.000.000 ,-
15.000.000 ,-
33.500.000 ,-
29.000.000 ,-
12.000.000 ,-
51.000.000 ,-
25.ooo.ooo ,-
21.000.000 ,-
22.700.000 ,-
333.200.000 ,-
906.197,49
♦269.675,98
334.375.873,47
514.930.404,13EE:TOTAL
EUA .
10.345.099 .181,49
Including exhcrtage differences

1Milk premiums (100 o/o>:Advances andfunds available inMember States far1979 f1)
IOat#of | Dacition ^ IBELGIUM
8FRD6NMARK
DKRGERMANT
DMFRANCE
ffiRELAND
IRLITAL,'
LITLUXEMBOURG .
LfRNETHERLANDS
HPLUNiTEO KINGDOM
UXLEEC TOTAL
UCE
I21^12.78 [15.000.000 ,-[6.000.000 ,-[50.000.000 ,-[28.000.000 ,-I - - ■ 6.500,000 ,-.I 900.000 ,-- A
I19.01.79- , . * 47.000,000 ^- 3.000.000 ,- I 218.000 ,- - - 2.700.000 ,- I 1.300.000 ,-- ./
I19.02.79 5.000.000 ,-I1.000.000 ,- 24.000,000 ,- 10.000.000 ,- 228.000 ,-- 1.200.000 ,- 1.400.000 ,- 3.500.000 ,- /
!21.03.79 15.000.000 ,-I9.000.000 ,-- 3.000.000 ,- 170.000 ,-- 500.000 ,- 2.300.000 ,-- /
1/.04.79I10.000.000 ,- 13.500.000 ,- 23.900.000 ,- !11.500.000 ,-I 240.000 ,*- 600.000 ,- 1.600.000 ,- /
|17.05.79 ;i5.ooo.ooo ,- 9.000,000 ;- 12.300.000 ,- I16.500.000 ,- 60.000 ,-- 800.000 ,- 150.000 ,- /
(15.06.79 15.000.000 ,- 7.500.000 ,- 6.800.000 ,- I 165.000 ,-- 2.200.000 ,- 100.000 ,- 1.000.000 ,- /
I17.07.79 10.000.000 ,- 15.000.000 ,- 6.000.000 ,- 7.000.000 ,- 100.000 ,- 700.000 ,- 3.000.000 ,- 1.000.000 ,-/ •
J30.07.79 5.000.000 ,- 10.000.000 ,- 50.000.000 ,- 13.000.000 ,- 400.000 ,- 1.500.000 ,- 2.000.000 ,-/
i14.09.79 5.000.000 ,- 12.000.000 ,- 1- 9.300.000 ,--I1.600.000 ,- 1.500.000 ,-/
,.17.10.79
(20.000.000 ,- '7.000.000 ,- 4.100.000 ,- 1]1.500.000 ,-1.000.000 ,-j1.700.000 ,-/ :
ITotal advances fil5.000.000 ,- 90.000.000 ,-I213.200.000 ,-jl12.200.000 ,-j1.581.000 ^-- 18.200.000 ,- '13.350.000 ,- 10.700.000 ,-
ITotalfundsaval Idble otj15.006.209 ,- 1U744.666,69 Ï3T2I3.321,51!31.419.075,52 j142.919,78 ] 140.062 ,- 1.531.940,10 1.164.919,05
I\Jan.19?'); 1__
ITotai avail.aole
1futttis 130.006.209 ,- 101.744.666,69 226.413.321,51 143.619.0 /5,52 1.723.919,78 18.340.062 ,- 14.881.940,10 11.864,919,05
Total ii.EUA(2 )i.250.833,74 14.309.903,85 90.243.286,98 24.690.501,44 2.569.557,28 459.590,41 5.440.449,40 18.326.070,98 159.290.194,08
Premiums forthenon-marketing ofotitic andfortheconversion ofdairy herds financed 600/0bytheGuarantee Section and400/0bytheGuidance Section .
^Including exchange dif**r»nc*s *

-74-VI/169/80-EN
ANNEX 11
fUNDS AVAILABLE INMEMBER STATES POR 1979 GUARANTEE SECTION
mEUA
Member State '
BELGIUM 4.3 7,4
70,6 57,4
74,9 I64,8
67,5 159,6
7.4 5,2
8,8'20,9
79,4 I49,?
88,2 70,1
67,1 63,-
21,1 i?,1Mar ici ' May ■lune Jut
5,3
58,1
63.4
62.5
0,90,9
97,3
98,2
86,-
12,212,1
107.4
119.5
89,6
29,929,6 26,5
92,1 |86,5
121,7 I113,-
"•,9 i75,1
26,8 :37,9Aug S*ot Oct Average Now vOec
Τ38,-i36,1 |
»'i76,4190,-112,5 |
53,7j53,7 1
36,3i61,8J
1 h62,-
13,3
75.3
56.4
18,9Av^ran «
22.2
71,1
93.3
69.6
23.719,1
31.7
50.8
«1,3
9,59,5 ,
52,-:
61,5 '
61,5 '20,V
U.,i
lit,, 1)
iO,!.
OENMARK 7,2
67,2
74,4
67,8
6,66,6
60,7
67,3
60,5
6,86,8
71,7
78.5
87.6
"9,1 .-9,1 I
66,-|
56,9
70,3 I
-13,4 I"13,2
84,3
71,1
80,8
-9,7-9,51-12,2
58,<|65,6
48,9 53,4
61,1 52,4
-12,21 1,-1,-
72,3
73,3
65,9
7,40,7
67.5
68,2
67.6
0,67,5
28,7
36.2
49.3
-13,1-13,-;
58,8
45,8J
45,8 '0,2
ώ.',7
64,3'
-0,0
IGERMANY TT" 1-15,1 !54,1 I89,1t
!52,1 !34,2 !'0,1 !9,31
!59,-i88,3 135,6 ! "54,6■f~ 1
1132-4 J-24.3 S4-■>
Β )226,2 I216,1 191,9 i185,8 223,8 !219,5 i265,5 246,8 219,3 I172,6 I216,8 31,3 1282,5 :20L.Ä
c (211,1 270,2 281,-237,9 :258,-!259,6 1274,8 305,a307,6 308,2 !271,4 163,7 ;258.2 !:-6 1.i
0 '157,2 i8i;i 228,8 203,7 2T7,7 i250,4 ,215,9 !217,1 !172,2 I177,4 i202,1 187,9 i258,2 dJJ.ft
;€ι'53,9 !89,1 152,2 |34,2 j'0,3 I9,2 !58,9 I88,7 }135,4 -|130,8 I69,3 j–24,2i
flUNCE f* .'1," 86,1 57,7 19,- 49,3 '36,1 !81,2 I 3,9 i48,5 I41,s I80,6 !6,9 4' V '
β I254,6 I195,-177,8 241,8 222,3 237,9 I144,-219,41 200,--?71,8 I216,5 16,6 278,d 20',.-
■ IC ,295,6 281,1 235,5 260,8 I271,6 I274,-;225,2 I211,5 !203,9 vi20,3 !258,- 97,2 ■I285,7 .
» 210,-223,2 216,4 211,' 235,4 .192,5 .I233,1 207,6i' 155,6 i'240,-i212,5 I90,4 i285,7 ' fcl/w.>
I|EI85,6 |57,9 |19,1 |'9,4I36,2
j|81,5I"?,9
ILM '8,3 |80,3|'5,5 |I6,8I"'la f.
IIRELAND r* I1
I 11,4 I27,3 15,-!28,5 10,3ra^sT[2,8 I9,1 I'-2,1 I-18,1 : Î»-V
8 .151,8 '3,4 56,- 2',5 51,9 !34,8 '5,-i 53,2 56,6 I64,1 !48,1 -|17,7 I85,3 4Ï.7
!c .i56,6 ; 67,4 t51,8 I66,9 l63,3 !55,3 '5,5 !51,1 I66,9 !57,2 15,6 |67,/
I» ,52,6 !36,- '0,3 37,- !■38,6 !52,9 1-63,- !51,4 '8,3 |68>9 !'8,9 33,8 67,7 4V.C-
. _JE f11,' |27,1 iU'8 128,3!10,4 1-7,7 1_-515|*'8I-2,-!
L8,3 ;-18,2I 5,
ITALY ' A. :18,4 I25,3 -',7 -5,6 i35,2 |78,3 92,4l153,2 i241>4 ;62,6 1135,3 ;35,-; &6,i
a ;63,1 88,2 11',3 83,5 !246,9 |199,5 I169,-141,-i 149,1 !-0,5 !125,4 I 75,5 1110,6
c 55,1 106,6 139,6 78,8 I2'1,3!234,7 |'247,3 233,4 !302,3 240,9 !188,-135,3 !110,5 ;177,1
10 '36,3 81,2 144,3 84,4 206,3 I156,7 154,1 79,4' 63,3 I104,9 |111,1 99,8 Ii110,5 "0,1
IE'18'8i25,' |-*'7I|-5,6 |35,-| 78,-|93,2 |239,-j136,-! 76,9 I35,5 ; »7,-
ILUXEMBOURG |A 0,1 !0,6 2,2 0,5 I3,1j2,2 IrO,l !0,6 !10,6 i 1,1 i0,1 '-0,3 0,9
!Β ':0,9 ;-2,2- 0,5 3,' 1,1 !2,' 0,9 0,6 0,3 ! 1,2 1 3,9
C ! 1,- 2,8 2,2 .1,2 ■3,9 |',2 :',6 0,» 1,2 !0,9 | 2,3 i0,1 '0,6> m
»»
Ia 0,4 i0,6 1,5 0,7 0,8 2,-1 0,2 )0,6 I0,8 1 1,2 :0,4 :.0,6
• IE r0,6 12>2I0,7 10,5 Î3,1 12,2 ;-0,1 i0,4 0,6 10,1 i 1,1 I-0,3 ;
tNETHERLANDS [A 1-18,4 I-'1,5 I-23,3 j-60,1 !6,8 !-40,9 i-19,3 '-41,3 --26,2 I49,3 ;-21,5 71,3 9,7
iθ !117,-I128,7 106,5 |173,5 •114,2 !160,5 lH4,5 !159,31 174,3 ;123,7 !137,2 3",* ■*1r >*
ic-'98,6 i87,2 83,2 113,4 !121,-|119,6 i95,2 |118,-148,1 !173,-1 115,7 :152,4 "40,i
0 ."9,9 ,110,3 1.43,4 ]106,5 I162,3 1139,- ."■36,7 1144,4 ,98,9 (1o2,3 :123,4 ;i42,7 '40,2 '
. E -41,3 I-23,1 |"60,2 |6,9 i-41,3 !-19,4 !-41,5 I-26,4 !49,2 :70,7 !-12,7 :9,7
IUNITED KlhGDON :Ar
-'.3 110,8 |6,7 I41,6 i77,4 !17,9 !21,?|11,7i•-18,6 |17,9 ,18,8 13,- 2,' f.,7
β 48.9 ;35,3 47,1 I51,9 r.22,5 ;52,1 !45,3 118,9 :83,4 :40,5 '44,6 :32,1 UUfc
c ;50,2 i46,1 53,8 |93,5 99,9 ]70,-! 66,5 I30,61 64,8 !58,4 :63,4 ■45,1 -6,.'
1D '39,4 39,4 12,6 17,1 '82,5 I48,8 :54,8 48,5 :46,6 ,44,9 -43,5 '43,- 46,'
: 1E !10,8 j6>7\'1,2 !76,4 )17,4 |21/2.111,7 )-17,9 !18,2 I13,5 19,9 2,1 '
[EECTOTAL rtA 18,8 ■'160,8 I181,6 I"83,4 i196,5 j140,5 !196,5 !134,6 !219,6 J559,1 i189,1 457,2 7,-:
Β 912,5 815,5 818,9 I919,5 1064,1 1063,5 .956,5 I949,91025,3 |758,1 •928,4 239,2 1009,5
C 931,3 976,3 H1000,5 ,11002,9 11260,6 ,1204,-1153/-·1084,5Π244,9 1317,2 ι1117,5 696,4 017,- '
I» I770,4 ;794,4 917,6 807,3 11120,8 11007,5 1018,2 |863,-!688,6 |861,5 i884,9 688,6 !1017 ,-
IE 160,9 I181,9 j82,9 |195,6 j139,8 |196,5 ,134,8 !221,9 [996,3 j455,7 !232,6 <7,8
«Balance atthebeginning ofthe month atthat Months' rate
*Advances for the month
*Total available for the aonth
'*•Expenditure for the month
*Balance still available
Thebalance still regaining available attheendofthe .Month resoresents thedifference between theamount available atthe
beginning ofeach month andtheexpenditure declared forthat month totheCommission ,without taking into account sums paidafter the20th ofthemonth inrespect ofthefollowing month .This procedure explains whynegative balances are shown
«tthe endofthe month for some ftember States .

-75-
VX/169/80-EN
ANNEX 12
riiwos AVMUOUG ST»T ESROW 19/9,PWTWRUH ro«THE NON^MARKET INC OFMTI*AM0
HILK PEOOUCFS ANO PHGWTUM FQFT THFC CONVERSION OF FT/UT^IT&T7TO6 A/AL
■EUA
MPHBCR 3<ATE'fct > n*r Juril IMay I-June JJul/*;Aug Sept Oct:Averaoc Nov ,due
EETCIUH :0.38
I0,380,25
0,76 0,25
I0,51 0,25
j0,25 iP.M.P.M.
0,12
0,12
0,12
P.M.P.M.
0,38
0,38
0,33
P.M.jP.M.
;0,25
!0,25
I0,25
P.M.P.H.
0,37
0,375,37
P.M.P.H.
0,37
0,37
0,37
P.H;P.H,
0.25
0,2S
0,25
P.K.P.K.
0,12
0,12
0,12
P.M.P.M.
0^13
0,13
0,13
P.M.0,06
0,24
0,30
0,27
0,03P.M.
0,50
0,50 .
0,50
P.M.P.M.
P.K.
0,30
-0;300,05
.,2".
0,:'/
0,it.
I1,6S
!0,86
I2,54
1,18
1,341,36
1,36
0,78
0,580,58
0,14
0,72
1.37-0,65
1,2 »
0,64
0,*9•0•»« |*»r'
-0,65 1-0,35-0,35
1,92
1.57
0,93
0,640.64
3,28
1.W
1,76
t0,160,16
1,05
1,21
1,41-0,20
2,07
1,87
1,61
-0,201 0,260,26
L1,38
I1,64
1,02
I0,620,62
1.65
2,27
1.66
0,610,41
1,16
1,57
1,27
0.300,61
0,98
1,59
1,57
0,02.0,02
0,02
1,21
-1,190,40
1.05
',4B
:30,34 -'25,37 |29,19 |29,36|24 ,- 22,71
I.--i9,50 I4,66 i- I2,38 19,76
i30,34 .134,87 {34,05 I29,36 *26,3842,47
t4,90 .5,47 i4,80 !5.42 13,55 I3,73
I25,44 .29,40 J29,25 123,94 .22,8J38,74CEMANV
.19,85 |18,74
25,10 .|38,36
I5,56 I8,06
'19,54 !30,3030,32
9,57
39,89
9,53
30,36138,81 |25,50 133,11 21,26 ?5,/E
-j' !8,46 .- :- -.',0;.
|38,81 [33,96 |33,1V 121,26<J.',îi
I6,09 ;5,71 111,38 i6,0' ,6,<".
132,72 128,25J21,23 .15,2'.i.-.,-,;
rRANCE ,5,44
•4,84
'10,28
|3.17
!?.H7,16
0,52
7,68
1,52
6,166,14
1,"
7,87
2,50
5,375,35 |3,60
0,52 j1,99
5,87 I'5,59
2,26 |3,24
3,61 J2,353,731-2,82
1,171 1,20
4,90 4,02
2,08 j1,03
2,82 12,992,95
2,20
5,15
1.57
3.583,60
1,58
•5,18
2,71
!2,474,31
1,86
6,17
2,15
4,022,48 j1,74
0,70 ;-
3,18 !1,74
1,44 I2,66
1,74 [-0,V2,Vn
IRELANO
\
ιβ
IΕ0,21
0,21
ι.0,28
<-0,07■0,07
0,32
0,25
0,25
p.n .p.«.
0,34
0,34
0,21
0,1Ï0,14
0,25
0,39
0,09
0,30i0,30
I0,36
0,66
0,17
I0,49|0,50 I0,51 0,71
0,09 j0,25 0,15
0,59 »i0,76 !0,86
0,07 .0,051 0,35
!0,52 0,71 0,510,51
0,59
1,10
0,26
0,84I0,84
I0,84
l0,35
i0,490,37
0,23
0,60
0,21 .
0,390,49 0,7
0,49
0,32
0,17I0,'7
I0,32
1-0,15J'V'J.--U
0,i:
ITALY
-r- -
I.
LUX£FL80U«G *,1.
0,16
0,16
0,16
P.M.P.M.
0,07
0,07
0,070,07
0,03
0,10
0,10
P.M.P.M.;
0,01 i
0,01 !
J
ο,ον !0,01 ,P.M. jP.H.I P,», IP.tt. I0,01 I0,01 .P.M. ,,0,0'
0,02 :0,02 I0,05 !0,C2 |0,04 !'- !3,24 10,^4
0,03 }0,02 0,051 <5*,02{0,04 j0,01 [O,05j0,04 )0,3*
0,03 I0,32 I0,05j 0,02 f0,03 i0,01 .0,04 ■0,03 '0,C6
p.*. jP.». 5P.M.I P..I. j0,01 ip.,i.»0,0.1 ;o,a:
NETHERLANDS ,0,56 |0,59
I0,33 I0.48
'0,89 |1,07
!0,30 J0,78
•0,59 |0,290,29
0,52
0,81
0,53
0,280,28 I0,54 '0,66-1 0,421-0,48 |0,17 '-0,02 .0,30 *0,46 :O,'Z
0,85 0,59 I0,05 J0,04 11,09 |- »0,57 !0,46 iG,ió
1,13 !1,13 I0,71 !0,46 ;'0,61 *!0,17 '0,55 ,0,76 IC,62 3.-;..
0,59f0,46 i0,29 ;0,94 10,44j'0,'9 0,10 i,0,47' 0>7S
0,54 Ι0,67 !0,42 (-0,48 Ί0,*71-0,02 ;0,45 I0,29 0,12
UNITED KINGDOM 1,72 I0,37
1,72 I0,37
1,35 I1,08
0,37 1-0,71-0,71
5,16
4,45
0,14
4,314,34 j-4,23 I1,U
4,34
0,17
4,17!4,23
'!3,'6
I1,07'1,11
:1,45
i-0,34 .1-0,34 -0,45
I1,56l 1,57
I1,22 11,1-2
!1,67 |1,77
[-0,45 i-O,65-0,67
3,27
2,60
1,44
1,162,-1
3,54 -
2,51
1,031,07 ■J,93
1,40 :2,60
2,-7 •3,53
1,-7 .2,43
1,-.;1,15 -O.z-J .
TOTAL EEC * j15,24
e .26,42
C 41,66
041,66
12,51
29,1529,28
20,13
49,41
12,72
36,6936,69
17,61
54,30
14,50
39,8039,80
3,30
43,10
9,38
33,72[33,70
'14,63
;<.A,33
J13,71
34,62.34,44
9,51
f43,95
:io,i9
133,76i^3,84 126,40 .'25,93
4,49 |8,73 27,36
;38,33l3S,13 53,29
|11,99 {9,02 8,36
"26,34 26,11 '44,93,44,99 32,03 33,13 24, -R/>*
j6,34 -13,85 -,5,*3.- *,VC
*51,33 [45,88 '43,31 '24,48 ^#:V
(13,56 H1,59 118,87 '13,V5
!37,77 !34,29 I24,44 .10,>3
A»Balance atthebeginning ofthe ®onth atthat aonth'a ran .
B■Advance forthemonth ,\
C■Total avai table for the month « •
0■Expenditure for the month . .
E■Balance still available
Thebounces remaining available atthe endofthe«onth represent thedifference between the amount available atthe "
beginning ofeach month andthee»oendlture forthat nonth totheCooaission ,without taking into account suns patd
after the20th ofthe«onth inrtsoect ofthefollowing ,aonth .Thi»procedure tuelaini whynegative balances are-
ahown atthe end ofthe aonth for soae Heabar States .
P«H «■tok«n entry

VI/169/80-EN
ANME X 13
EXCHANGE RATES -1979
ê
1)Conversion ofmonthly exp;-cMture into EUA-budgetary rates
IExpôndi tore
-I^ :r-.Rate ;rj : 8FR DKR DM FF IRL LIT LFR HFL UKl 1
rflium.!i–i JANUARY120.11.78-C277/78 |39,6627 j6,9680 2\J>$1951 15,78185 !0,67521 6*1.109.53 [39,6627 I2,73406 !'0,675216 ]
jFEDkIJARY I20.12.78 -C505/78 !j39,6882 I7,01254 jI2,50810 '5,74532 10,679497 '1.134,22 I39,6882 2,71925 *0,679497 j
IMARCH 19.01.79 - C19/79 39,5795 I6,95915 I12,50707 ¡5,76440 ;0,67911 7il.137,13j39,5795 i2,70592 ÍQ,679117 |
IAPRIL I20.02.79 - 47/79 \|39,5702 6,96023 Il2,50814 '5,78905 '0,674019-1.136,75 139.57Q2j 2,70957 -0,67395 1n«. |20.03.79 -C75/79j|39,7647 ||7,01313 jj2,51540 !5,79631 10,665261 'i.134,06 j39,764 ?!2,71431 'o,665261
IJUNE |20.04.79 -r100/79j40,1501 I7,05759 II2,53271 |5,81523 I0,6Å1213 ;1.1?7^99 I40,1501 !2,74066 10,643808
IJiiiy I18.05.79 -C126/79 jj40,4808 |[7,11394 ||2,52333 |[5,83363 0,667416 11.124,38 I40,4808 j2,75037 !p,641057
IAUGIIST I20.06.79 -r.155/79 |140,4135 j[7,25617 j!2,51672 jr , , ,
15,84373 j0,666479 il.134,55 I|40,4135 I2,76231 lo,635429
iSEPTEMBER II20.07.79 .-C183/79 [*„ 1
140,5803 j|7,26784 II2,53040 15,90049 i0,671017 11.140,27 )l40,5803 !2,78221 '0,611684 |
I_OCTOBER 20.08.79 -C209/79 ]j40,4474 1r i : i ;: n17,28088 12,52577 15,87737 I0,671878 11.129,15 !Î ' – 1-- ■
I40,4474-1 2,77435 '0,623928
INOVEMBER I20.09.79 -r.'38/79J!40,0670 |j7,17052 12,49661 <5,86084 i0,665240 il.134,28 i40,C670l 2,74996 '0,653035
IDECEMBER |I19.10.79 -C265/79 i!40,1592 117,26486 [2,49374 [5,85086 I0,668090 |1.149,78 I40,1592 2,76337 'o,644735 |
Total ture innational curren cy , ' -
2)Average rates "Total exf^'-di ture inEUA '
> : iRelouim !(Vnm;irk iiW-TTTnv ITrance lIreland I|Italy !Luxp-b .INetherI.JlUn.Kino .[
Averacje rate inEUAI i
40,0176; ; 1
7,09957 2,51s37 5,81885 ■0,670052 11.133,32I :
40,1514 2,74109 0,649236
ft-

ANNEX ' ■
EXCHANGE DIFFERENCES -1979 FINANCIAL YEAR (3)
EUA
Member State ■ Guarantee Premiums (1) ■ Total ~ I
Belgium -288.367,01 -876,24 -289.243,25
Denmark ■. ♦534.775,87 ♦6.372,86 ♦541.148,7S
Germany • ♦1.454.989,88 ♦300.897,55 ■♦1.755.887,43
France ♦197.724,08 -36.966,78 - ♦160.757,30
Ireland ♦617.404,42 ♦7.712,12 ♦625.116,54 .
Italy , •-427.525,98 -427,525,98
Luxembourg _ ' 43.799,78 ♦102,96 -43.696,82
.Netherlands . .♦1.301.769,83■ -®78,25 •♦1.300.891,58
i United Kingdom ♦416.761,76 ♦64.666 ,- '•. ♦481.427,76
TOTAL '♦3.763.733,0 7 .♦341.030,22 4.104.763,29
*
Premiums forthe non-marketing ofmilk andpremiums fortheconversion ofdairy herds (Regulations (EEC)No.1078/77)
ofwhich :60%financed bytheGuarantee Section =+ EUA
40%financed bytheGuidance Section =+ EUA ' • • . -
Foreach Member State there isadifference between thebalance atthe endofeach month asconverted into EUA
atthat month 'srate andthe same balance asconverted into EUAatthefollowing month 'srate .This table .. •.
shows thetotal exchange differences recorded for each Member State forthe ,whole of1979 . ,

ANNEX 15
tAGGF GUARANTEE SECTION
CASES OFIRREGULARITY
(AMOUNTS INEUA)i960 )ANO RECOVEftV OFOVERPAYNENTS
E.M.r1971 C1972C197J 1974 1975 j 1976 II II I[ 1979 ITOTAL E.B. I
8H ---- - 8 _813B5j....[î\\- -1F-P-k539.95& ] PI l_22.144J_1S]L-1.577.928
LJ U m8.383L M 5.122L4.080 - 55.224-■5 72.809
.M 11.854.191 151.043.365 31 244.689 I1.350.97â 691.838.851 |862.229.511 !|49U.545.90S ISI |'948.337 Ira 562.819 401 22.618 A44I
» " " "t h- 1 H-h - l.:.::;U11.724.751U1.043.365LU242.749UI373.68n60 479.917I"f993.805 |381.166.194 40 767.108 13° 384.204 I343 '17.175.780
«k- K M --7^37 .I.624.661 L2-I_502.842 _|-1L..2.902 ^!4-.352,282 Ih \I.1*2.357 .ra DR[1.705.7721
LU LU 7^1536I310.45uM 502.842 |M I 2.902 " 229.572 9I101.523 H27.829 59 1.182.271
FR51.270.954 7-891.400 ;!2.094.148 7132.34/j4 466.793 8F806.709 9 170.101 3?i
- J230.444Drt6.062.896
L–LU _JLJI 2.386U380.497ilI e-'M11.j60.259LJI 11.125 2 12.966 6 33.343 201 127.971 40 637.493
IftL --- K 1I_.8.743J 1IIJB0.60(J «I_178i234j\M [~519.904 _RR !_204.260 jRR I._1«425_M LIT[1.093.166
LUL U U|8.743 |U180.600LU [178.234M |270.712 ;4 199.693 1 1.425- «f 839.407
"k- K KIJ41.91o |6L_ H I_,48.498 J 1.161UL6A8.091 IHrr.77 N I152.815 HT 1.001.409 I
UU U: LU| ■2.033 |UI 1.992LUI 1.036 I - 5.061 1
LUX !----- -K --- - : --- - □ 7R:::;Gr~r:Mr–UU I: LU 1 LU •--
.
NL"IL.I^21jK K--3^6]L7L UI_56.219 _-i 4-879 1 I.947.5251M[__7.217 _ra -644.013 UL[U787.264UU UJ22.321UL:LU [3.956 1101.134 r 56.219 2 4.879 7 14.751 3 7.217 * 644.013 36I 854.490
- I-- H Μ !.2/5.202J-1-.2,093,730 k61^86.855 ]RII.903,449 !ra _408.160 _244 I4.968.023
LU U LU 577LJ LU44 989.726 4"363.288 2 77.838 1 26.038M 1.457.467
CCE_β_11.876.512 2.314.319 Kll.306.81ll k\_4.360.65 JMO I3.037.-315 J226.5.331.253 M'a.321.583J113:I2.172.8862.093.970 903 40.81S.302l
I IV[11.747.072 1^1|1.045.751 |LU |654.091 |Ν976.809 |I"I|l.283.629 |L2D [2.277.229j LU2.041.688 ]l6U|988.454 ;Hjl~210.055 J549|j22.224^778 1
Number ofcases reported and amount
Number ofcases where over payments were recovered ,with amount recovered
,case .s irregularity ,ofwhich 15were reported in1973,39in *7444In LL•.• 11 ....
(regulation (EEC)No.69/287operated from 5August to1October 1969.' concerned asingle special intervention measure
144Cases ofirregularity ,ofwhich 83were reported in1976 44in*771Ain «4l>Q ,system ,which hassince been improved ' 9concepned non-payments ofMCAs duetoaweakness intheRA RRL^;:- «•- »

SECTOR
Cereals
Mille and «nitk
products
Pigmeat
Egg*
Poultry teat
Beef and Veal
Oili and fats
Fruits ànd
vegetables
Sugar
Non-Anne *XI
products
Other sectors
nCAs
«C
Total
ofwhich :
1.amounts recovered
expenditure JustiNOOf
icases
Ree.
Irr.
Total
Ree.
Irr.
Total
Ree «
Irr.
Total
Ree.
Ree.
Ree.
Irr.
Total
Ree.
Irr.
Total
Ree.
Irr.
Total
Ree.
Irr.
Total
Ree.
Ree.
Irr.
Dee.
Irr.
Total
ör
fied
2.amounts for which the
recovery procedure isin
progressBelgio »Atiltex 14 •
EAG6E 6IMH"t *;c. -10,0
rASES OfIRREGULARITY REPORTED AND AMOUNTS RECOVERED (amounts inEUA)
Oennark
Mo o
22.144
22.144
22.144
22.144NO 0
tase
40.800
2.574Germany
2.217
1.350
1TW
26.634
4.791
42.150
73.575|France
tlooTIreland
2.4!3
11.7.18
3.738
137.?16 _
14Κ054
30.062
253.409
112.183
27-B ?)
45.7463013.753
132.127
430.692
562.519tzrzr
Aniount |« |Amount
£!"{
13.049
14.561
173.683
26 18a.244
1.323
27.828
27.610
175.006
'230.444
384.204
178.61520
12127.971
102.473Italy Lu*em&ourg
°fAmftunt
34.301
18.514
152.815
152.815ftnounlNetnerianos
TôTT
:ase
2.577
J90.0?2 _United
Kinqciom
i0 k
ca~5t
152.81525.72114 52.566
ΤΓΓΠ8.tojm .
EEU
Noo
c««
40
17.4867.588
8.207 8
2.577
633.229
544.013 i25
644.013
24336.868
10.726
52.566
408.iSo
26.038
382.12235
18
15
63
116'2.443
9.305
11.7W
19.3S4
977.7 -:?
997.!'3
13.712
30.062
43.774
24.366
454.163
470.529
18.514
112.183
13.763
lfl.809
32.572
399.537
61
55105,su
1.508.602
2.wwm
1.210.055
883.915

80 VI/169/80-EN
, 1 ANNEX17
IRREGULARITIES RELATING TOINTERVENTION PAYMENTS
f~"^!Cases
3flember 'reported pursuant to-Art.3by~™~1
yearjr~~~
'rotaI
\1979"™jinterven -!Cases i
Mnvolv-
Statej1V71n
1972 |
l_157U1974 |19751
J|ÎS761977fl978
Ii 1
1979tionexpj
enditure
CmEUA)I'ingint-^
erventio<
payment sìalance
4
•6!!-i!li!M41i-1i1!
i15 1!l67iiu 1■4
( !
|D *50|!63iI69!I8649j!48!259(2);1.522 1|182 I77
DK 1!7I26;V i
\1i141nI11j171
I !I208 i26
l !45
1 I
FR 12i[5I■'i4ieIς
!-j4-i77|988 I33'|j44
1HL 11!2!110t5!
1 ■?I1i21I22I222j!5 JiI*
17
IT!3!
i_!.6!
|_j•14!
1
_i!2'
_1'51
1..1?
1j1 \
\ \ '
!'•34 -j1*173
>a32 j
I2
1w
jNLI5!
?I?!i
2iI91i*!1
6;i3911- 1
!338 !
1«'24
L1"i1
I j4!118 !55||40I23}100(3)!i374 !|23LilJ
Lifi-J7?II89 IL130|226r~–-–
|ISOj113!•116j617i4.995 I321|rn6
HCA'sbetween Community countries arenotincluded heresincetheyfallinto
the'trade'category ana,forthepurposes ofthisanalysis ,-havetobe
considered asrefunds .
^ThefiguresgivenforthenumberofcasesinGermany(259and182respectively )
donotincludethe142casesreported from1973to1976,ar.dinparticular
in1974,1975and1976,whichrelatedtoasinglespecialintervention measure
(69/2S7/EEC,cereals -B)operated from5Augusttc1October 1969only.
3........... ......LnthecaseoftheUnitedKingdom,144ofthecasesdeducted concerned thenon-
payments ofMCA'sresulting fr.oma'weakness inthesystem,"whichhasbeen
•improved since1977.
4.... * *Mostorthese .casesconcerned refunds and'MCAs .

VI/169/80-EN
ANNEX 18
-■ Ν
SUMMARY OFIMPLEMENTATION FOR THE 1979' FINANCIAL YEAR
(Chapter 92-Community food aid)
Approp .available * mEUA
A.APPROPRIATIONS FOR "IjHE "FINANCIAL YEAR
1.Initial approp .,ï >287,34
2.Supp .appropriât iorts 8,70
3.-Transfers
TOTAL296,04
B.APPROPRIATION SFORWE PREVIOUS
FINANCIAL YEAR 1
-automatic carryovers
from 1978
-non-automat iccarry-
overs
TOTAL100,07
Í>Í3
ÏÔÔJÔ7 *Implementation
C.COMMITMENTS ■
1.Total .commitments
2.Automatic carryovers to
3.Sumas not committed1980
TOTALa)
b)
(a+b)
D.PAYMENTS ,
1.Application ofcarryovers from 1978
-payments a),from automatic carryovers
b)from non-automatic carry­
overs
-lapsed • ...
.TOTAL CARRYOVERS FROM 1978
2.Application of1979 appropriations
a)payments .
~b)Carryovers "to1980 , . "
-automat ic
-non-automat ic
TOTAL CARRYOVERS FROM 1979 TO1980
3.Appropriations lapsed
;-out of1929 allocation-out or1978 carryovers
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS LAPSEDmEUA
296,04
137,10
pm
""296,04»)
100,07
pu
.~ÏÔÔ,Ô7 "
158,94
137,10
pn
137,10
pm
P«,
pm/iUtilization
100 X»
0%
ïôôT
25,3 X
40,1 X
34,6 X
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS
AVAILABLE CX+y)=z396,11
TOTAL (x♦y)=2 396,11 100 X
A) *
p.m*–toktrt' *ntvy

ANNEX 19
CONtfji£ITYFOOD AID ~CHAPTER 92
CASH 'OSITION AT51DECEWSEK 1979
'MEMBER STATt
2Amount avail - .
able st
1January 1979Advpnces grarueo
for 1979Expenditure from
1January 1979 to
31December 1979Amount available "Adjusted availab-t
at31Dec.1979 "Siity at 1Jan.198Cfi i
BELGIUM BFR
.EUA219,93 /
5.545,311
.192,61,750
<.3.600.000
,648.964,901.783
1,1\,017.678
.529.944,57
ïDENMASK DKR
EUA30 >503
.i«37S.2,40,50
,322,7511?
15,850.000
,973.694,91124
17,176,735,36
,703.341,57d*(a♦b)
187.519.633
4.664.212,94
19.181.505,14
2.648.676,09187.519
4.662.633 J
,510,20 :
19.131 .
2.618 .505,14
163,70
sSERMANY DM
PUA26,696
ï0.59 5,690,21
,935,02200
79,800.000
,945.512,37199
79,433.114,93
317,968,0828.063.575,28
11.223.529,3128.063
11.302.575,28 J
.467,73 1
-FRANC fc
s
!IRELANDfF
EUAÓ.V'5
1,206,269,02
,407,81367
62,297.000
,787.277,0ά346
59,100.069,46
,204.518,3728,172.199,56
4.789.166,5028.172 ,
4.835 ,199,56 :
980,79 S
2
IRL
EUA?62
3>;8 ,!sa'32,460.000
,157.978,40.135.735,40
,694,917,62586.355,31
851.219,10586
872,355,31 î
.904,56 :
5ITALY LIT
ï EUA1,843.693
1.o61,920
.629,1 121.095
18.000.000
.697.272,8014.199
12.466.240
,495.141,868.739.277.680
7.773.820,058.739.227
7.543.680
.050,69
LUXEMBOURG LFR
S EUA10.84 .-?
275,3 684
2.100.000
,117.146,4884
2,092.333
.097.970,8318.509
19.449,0118 .509 î
460,20 J
JiETMERLANDS MFi_
i EUA1.296
4?U.023,99
.029.1047
!1.892.000
.464.592,0446
16.520.085,43
,936.624,4375.890,58
53.878,5175
27.890,58 J
.370,34 :
UNITED KINGDOi "yKL
g " EUA72
107,469,7?
.328,2&£60.000
.524.82 7,10 1.524.82 7,10
250.027.266,061
241763.332,01
.167.659,62169.037,76
264.295,76169
260.087,76 !
.777,33 1
fOTAL EFC/EUA 23.409 ,323,16 148.346,95 32.288.247,27
•_32.123.685,54 :
Based on'El!Arate ,on?CNovember 1979 valid -for'advance payments ofJanuary 1980 .

ANNEX 20
\
EXPENDITURE DECLARED BYTHE MEMBER STATES
Expenditure declared (ifiEUA ) ' :'
Member State:
. Cereals : Milk products
^ ^ ^ a*»» •Sugar andother
expendi ture■•a
aTotals
| um,–•
•Belgiuma
a
9.233.655 :m
m
11X : 35.296.289,5 ?: 22* :a
*» *a
*44.529.944,57 :18,51 :
a
tDenmark.«
«
««» • 17.703.341,57 ': 11% :* a
17.703.341,57 : 7X:
»
» •
lGermany , '«
«a
:-6.740.931,33 : ex : 72.575.912,19 :45,5*: 1.124,56 :;1X :; 79.317.°68,08 :
» •33 X!
•Francea
4> «
: 46.243.269,47 ;:58* .1 12.961 .240,90 ::8*';t a
* * : 59.204.518,37 :
m ' •25x;
a
• Va
:IrelandI► » •
! - i» •
a
I a 7.542.522,08 :: 5X :;-152.395,54 ;:99*: 7.694.917,62 : 3X :
a
sltaly ■ . : 12.495.141,86 !:16Χ ν:» I
► a»
» <» <
: -> ':»
» : 12.495.141,86 ;I5X:
, a
tux'enfcourg
a* 4
S !
• , TtI ».
■ m •• a
• .' a2.097.#0,83 1:IX i■ <
» m*
a»
: 2.097.970,83 ;
a 1! 1X:
» :
a
Netherlands : 5.240.344,11 :» •
: 7X : 11.696.340,32 :\7X■
a m : 16.936.634,43 :7X î
• •
a
United Kingdom ,: 85.818,69a «
: p» : 1.082.040,93 :0,5*a
• 'a»a,
a
a : 1.167.859,62 :0,5X :
:EEC : 80.039.160,46 :100X ; 160.955.666,39
-.wT •v:100* : 153.520,10 :100X :241.148.346,95• •
:100 X :
a • •
_–*■*(> _:66,5* :0,52 :100 X ·
: :: :
a a
a •

«ΝΝΕΧ ?1
euPGET APPROPRIATIONS ,1979 On €UA);CASH POSITION ASAT31D£C£*9£R 1979
92
920
9219200
9201
9210
9211
9212
9213
922
923
924 I9220
9230
I9240ProgrammeAmounts available
1978 approp - -
riations carr- ^ied over into
1979
rood aid
CEREALS
Before 1979
1979
Hilk Products
Skimmed miIk
Skimmed milkpov
before 1979
Butter oilbefor
1979
Butter o1l,19?9
SUCARΦβ
Before 1979
1979
(Other Products
jOther products
lOther expenditur
lother expenditur
TOTALH.439.250,5<
46.826.281,91
der
e38.610.435,6 "
94.599,3i
100.000
100.070.567,4 /Entered In
1979
4.818.000
96.117.000
22.269.000
87.940.000
11.994.000
62.250.000
1.448.000
500.000
287.336.000♦9.629.476,59
-4.803.118,05
♦ 332.392,35
-2.332.392,35
♦11.081.865,65
j-11.081.865,65
173.641,46
♦5.700.000
+8.700.000.TOTAL
28.886.727,09
91.313.881,95
69.427.674,33
85.607.607,65
61.686.301,32
51.168.134,35
268.240,78
1.448.000
S.700.000
600.000
596.106.567,47Appropri ions
for
Committent
28.886.727.0 ;
91.313.881,95
69.427.674,32
85.607.607,65
61.686.301,32
51.168.134,35
268.240,78
1.448.000
5.700.000
600.0001979
expendi ture
dectared by
flr«ber States
25.280.634,95
54.758.475,4<
66.536 .544,9<
21.131.985,8 *
60.083.870,9(
13.203.264,7 :
1.124,5<3
152.395,54
396.106.567,47p41 .148.346,99 17.858.98'!,111979
expend iture
by
Commi ssion
3.606.042,1 ?
4.755.442,97
2.891.129,39
4.181.531,87
1.602.430,42 !
276.999,22
267.116,22
270.923,22
7.365,68Tot aI
expenditure
for
1979
28.886.727,0'
59.513.918,41
69.427.674,3 :
25.313.517,6'
61.686.301,3 ;
13.480.263,9 !
268.240,7 !
270.923,2
159.761.2iUnused
appropr iations
31.799.963,49
0
60.294.089,96
0
37.687.870.40
1.448.000
5.429.076,78
.440.238 ,?8
259.007.328,Od137.099.239,41Aut'va tic
carryovers
Art.6(1)(c>
Financial Reo.Laosed
appropria
31.799.963,49
60.294.089,96
0
37.687.870,40
1.448.00 *)
5.429.076,78
440.238,77
137.099.239,40