ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 329/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8616 — Partners Group/Civica)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 329/04)

On 20 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8616. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 315/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8493 — Deere & Company/Wirtgen)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 315/02)

On 3 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8493. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 337/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8356 — Wietersdorfer/Amiantit/Hobas JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 337/06)

On 3 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8356. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 331/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8576 — Balder/Varma/Serena)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 331/03)

On 19 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8576. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 346/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8620 — KKR/WBA/PharMerica)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 346/02)

On 4 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8620. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 341/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8585 — Axis/Novae)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 341/02)

On 5 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8585. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 356/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8453 — Nestlé/BPW)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 356/03)

On 13 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8453. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 350/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8645 — Advent/Williams Lea)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 350/01)

On 9 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8645. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
On 20 October 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Mitsui & Co., Ltd (‘Mitsui’, Japan)

— Sime Darby Property (Sungai Kapar) Sdn Bhd (‘Sime Darby’, Malaysia), belonging to the Sime Darby group.

Mitsui and Sime Darby acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over a newly created joint venture (the ‘JV’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 358/1

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8547 — Celanese/Blackstone/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 358/02)

On 17 October 2017, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8547 — Celanese/Blackstone/JV, to the following address:

European Commission Directorate-General for Competition Merger Registry 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel BELGIQUE/BELGIË

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
On 13 November 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany),

— Carl Zeiss AG (Germany), controlled by Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung,

— Deutsche Telekom AG (Germany),

— Carl Zeiss Smart Optics, Inc. (USA), controlled by Carl Zeiss AG and Deutsche Telekom AG.

Carl Zeiss AG and Deutsche Telekom AG acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Carl Zeiss Smart Optics, Inc.

The concentration is accomplished by way of acquisition of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 385/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8586 — TPC/JSR/UMG/UBE/MR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 385/02)

On 10 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8586. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
On 17 November 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Hutchison Ports Netherlands BV (‘HPN’, Netherlands),

— TMA Holding BV (‘TMA Holding’, Netherlands),

— TMA Logistics BV (‘TMA Logistics’, Netherlands).

HPN and TMA Holding acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over TMA Logistics, currently solely controlled by TMA Holding.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
On 16 November 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Sogecap SA (‘Sogecap’, France) belonging to the Société Générale group (France)

— Cardif Assurance Vie SA (‘Cardif Assurance’, France) belonging to the BNP Paribas group (France)

— BNP Paribas Diversipierre OPCI (‘Diversipierre, France), belonging to the BNP Paribas group (France)

— Powerhouse France SAS (‘Powerhouse France’, France)

Sogecap, Cardif Assurance and Diversipierre acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Powerhouse France.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
On 23 November 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Kyocera Corporation (Japan) (‘Kyocera’),

— Ryobi Limited (Japan) (‘Ryobi’),

— Ryobi Dalian Machinery Co., Ltd (China) (‘RDM’),

— Ryobi Sales Co. (Japan) (‘Ryobi Sales’),

— Kyocera Industrial Tools Co., Ltd (Japan) (‘KIT’).

Kyocera acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of KIT and Ryobi Sales. Kyocera and Ryobi acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of RDM.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture and by way of purchase of shares.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 406/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8668 — DER Touristik/EXIM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 406/01)

On 24 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8668. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 429/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8562 — Cargill/Faccenda Investments/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 429/03)

On 15 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8562. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 428/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8711 — Macquarie/Oiltanking/Oiltanking Odfjell Terminal Singapore)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 428/06)

On 5 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8711. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 441/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8705 — BC Partners/Ceramtec)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 441/03)

On 15 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8705. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
On 20 December 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— SA Industrias Celulosa Aragonesa, belonging to the group Saica (‘Saica’, Spain),

— Emin Leydier SA (‘Emin Leydier’, France), controlled by First Eagle Funds, through Financière Rouge LLC and Financière Bleu LLC, and belonging to the group Emin Leydier.

Saica acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Emin Leydier.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
On 8 January 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Toohil Telecom Holdings Limited (‘Toohil Telecom’, Ireland), ultimately controlled by Mr Xavier Niel (France), and

— Eircom Holdco S.A. (‘Eircom’, Luxembourg).

Toohil Telecom acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Eircom.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 7/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8664 — WME IMG/Perform/PIMGSA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 7/01)

On 15 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8664. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 31/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8740 — Schmolz+Bickenbach/Assets of Asco Industries)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 31/01)

On 22 January 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8740. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
On 16 January 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Macquarie Super Core Infrastructure Fund SCSP (‘MSCIF’, United Kingdom), belonging to the Macquarie Group,

— Allianz Infrastructure Luxembourg I S.à.r.l. (‘AIL’, Luxembourg), controlled by Allianz SE and belonging to the Allianz Group,

— Lakeside Network Investments S.à.r.l. (‘Elenia Group’, Finland), currently owned by 3i Networks Finland LP, GS International Infrastructure Partners II, LP., G.S. Global Infrastructure Partners II, L.P. and Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company.

MSCIF and AIL acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of the Elenia Group.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.