25. Takes note of the concerns expressed by the Assembly about the threat hanging over certain pro-
duction areas such as cocoa, rum, sugar and bananas, whose importance to the economies of someACPcountries is considerable, and undertakes to take these legitimate concerns into consideration and topromote the protection of the systems of preferences from which the ACPcountries benefit in their traderelations with the Union;
26. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the ACP-EU Council, the ACP-EU Joint Assembly
and the Commission.
10. Stabilisation and association agreement with the Former Yugoslav Republic
of Macedonia
A5-0031/2000
European Parliament resolution on the Commission recommendation for a Council Decision
authorising the Commission to negotiate a Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the for-
mer Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (SEC(1999) 1279 ydash C5-0166/1999 ydash 1999/2121(COS))
The European Parliament,
/dash having regard to the Commission recommendation (SEC(1999) 1279 /dash C5-0166/1999),/dash having regard to the report by the Commission on the feasibility of negotiating a Stabilisation and
Association Agreement with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (COM(1999) 300 /dashC5-0118/1999),
/dash having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure,/dash having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security
and Defence Policy and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research andEnergy and the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (A5-0031/2000),
A. whereas the Commission is proposing to place relations between the EU and the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia on an entirely new contractual basis and to afford that country the prospectof full integration in the structures of the EU,
B. whereas this is the first specific implementation of the concept of a stabilisation and association pro-
cess for the countries of South-Eastern Europe through which the EU seeks to make its contribution tothe Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe,
C. whereas in its feasibility report of 16 June 1999 (COM(1999) 235) the Commission concludes that in
the light of the political and economic reforms that have already been implemented under the coop-eration agreement, and provided there are transitional periods in certain areas, the former YugoslavRepublic of Macedonia could satisfy the conditions for a stabilisation and association agreement,
D. Pointing out the constructive and responsible conduct of Macedonia during the war that ravaged the
countries of former Yugoslavia and stressing that its delayed approach march to the EU was due toproblems with a Member State rather than to any lack of will to join the Union,
E. acknowledging the stabilising role which the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia has played in
the region during the Yugoslav wars, in particular with regard to integrating the Albanian minorityinto the political and social life of the country and the willingness to engage in regional cooperation,
F. Underlining the important role that the Albanian minority could play in this country and the positive
repercussions that this model of coexistence could have in the neighbouring countries, with regard inparticular to Albania and Kosovo,
G. Whereas the development and consolidation of a strong interethnic civil society is a key factor that
could contribute to the internal stabilisation of this country,C 339/266 EN 29.11.2000 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 17 February 2000
H. having regard to the economic disadvantages under which the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedo-
nia has been suffering for many years as a result of the sanctions against the Federal Republic ofYugoslavia,
I. Whereas regional cooperation concerning FYROM can only develop positively if the population and
the economy of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia are included in this cooperation and whereas
therefore the existing sanctions against this country have to be concentrated on its regime and the
negative impact of these sanctions on the people and the economy should be reduced,
J. acknowledging the role in support of peace which the country played during the Kosovo crisis by
accepting the stationing of NATO troops and an influx of refugees from Kosovo,
K. acknowledging the evident willingness of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to engage in
regional cooperation as demonstrated by its bilateral agreements with Slovenia, the Federal Republicof Yugoslavia and Bulgaria and through active participation in the Stability Pact with multilateral pro-ject proposals jointly with Greece, Bulgaria and Albania,
L. supporting the fundamental approach that the principle of ‘integration instead of disintegration’
should apply to the future political and economic shape of South-Eastern Europe, and therefore thatfurther development of the Regional Approach which the EC took in 1996 towards five countries inthe region (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, FYROM and Albania)is not only a key feature of the regional concept of the Stability Pact but also reflects the overall
philosophy of EU integration,
M. whereas, however, given the major differences in the pace and variety of development in the individ-
ual countries of the region, in the first instance the principle should be that no country should behindered in its efforts to draw closer to the EU by the behaviour of other countries,
N. whereas the recent problems which occurred during the presidential elections show that improve-
ments have still to be made in the field of democracy, political participation and transparency,
1. Welcomes the negotiating mandate for a stabilisation and association agreement with the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and calls for a speedy start to negotiations;
2. Recommends that the Stabilisation and Association Agreement should take the form of a joint agree-
ment based on Article 310 of the EC Treaty;
3. Recommends, in view of the fact that the question of the legal personality of the EU has not yet been
clarified, that the use of Articles 24 and 38 of the EU Treaty be ruled out as a legal basis for the Stabilisa-tion and Association Agreement in conjunction with any other provision of the Treaty establishing theEuropean Communities;
4. Regards the opening of stabilisation and association negotiations with the former Yugoslav Republic
of Macedonia as an important contribution to the political consolidation and economic development of thecountry, as an important signal for stability and as an important contribution to the establishment of a justinternational order in the region;
5. Stresses the exemplary character which the agreement with the former Yugoslav Republic of Mace-
donia has for the other countries of the region and supports the agreement’s approach towards regionalcooperation;
6. Is opposed, however, to the creation of a multilateral cooperation structure as the prerequisite for the
conclusion of a bilateral stabilisation and association agreement or as an additional accession criterion overand above the Copenhagen criteria, as referred to by the Commission in the general document on theprogress report on enlargement;29.11.2000 EN C 339/267 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 17 February 2000
7. Stresses that in view of the unequal development and specific features of the countries in question
(Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, FYROM and Albania) each countryneeds to be considered on its own merits and no country must become the hostage of its neighbourswhere the process of approximation to EU structures is concerned;
8. Takes the view that the Regional Approach proposed by the EU for the countries of South-Eastern
Europe should become a commitment on both sides and that there should not be a one-way street towards
satisfying the acquisby the countries in question, but that the EU itself should provide material support
through specific regional aid measures; this mutual obligation should therefore be expressed in the stabili-sation and association agreement;
9. Advocates therefore active EU regional aid under the Stability Pact to support, for example, regional
infrastructure projects such as the expansion of European corridors eight and ten, cross-border energy,environment and water projects, joint improvement of the management of borders and customs or jointmultilateral police training;
10. Takes the view that the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia should participate, as an equal
partner, in the process of rebuilding Kosovo;
11. Is opposed to separating the countries of South-Eastern Europe, even in a symbolic way, from the
general enlargement process;
12. Takes the view that a future stabilisation and association agreement should contain an evolutionary
clause opening up the prospect of EU membership for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia;
13. Suggests that the parallel enlargement that the countries in the region are offered through a step-by-
step integration into EU structures should include institutional arrangements, such as the possibility forcountries to send junior lawyers and civil servants to the European Court of Justice and to the EuropeanCommission;
14. Advocates continuation of the multi-beneficiary, cross-border programmes under PHARE beyond
the year 2000 so that the process of regional cooperation can actually be implemented;
15. Takes the view that the stabilisation and association process should also receive appropriate finan-
cial support from the EU in the form of appropriate aid programmes, and therefore proposes for the five
countries of the Western Balkans a uniform stabilisation and partnership programme which would retain
the name ‘PHARE’ (PHARE-SAP: Stabilisation and Association Programme, or PHARE South-Eastern);
16. Insists that the aid and assistance the world gives to the region must have as its overriding priority
to benefit the recipients, and therefore that the aid given must not be dependent on reciprocal orders fromthe donor country;
17. Takes the view that the stabilisation and association programme should ensure that contacts and
cooperation with associated countries can continue and be further developed;
18. Takes the view that the continuity of cross-border cooperation projects and multi-country pro-
grammes must be duly ensured;
19. Proposes to include FYROM in a number of cultural and educational programmes /dash for example,
Leonardo, Socrates, Youth for Europe;
20. Regards the development of civil society and assistance to democracy and media projects as an area
requiring strong attention;C 339/268 EN 29.11.2000 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 17 February 2000
21. Takes the view that implementation of the stabilisation and association agreement should be
accompanied by a White Paper to serve as a precise guide for the country in its efforts to approximateto the acquis communautaire and to assess progress in implementation not merely after a period of five years
in a Commission report, but continuously on a biennial basis;
22. Takes the view that implementation of the programmes should be decentralised and shifted from
Brussels to Skopje, with due attention being paid to enhanced coordination between programming, man-agement, implementation and follow-up, with as short-term priorities improving the civil service, customsand frontier management and promoting small and medium-sized enterprises;
23. Is of the opinion that in order to enhance and strengthen coexistence a specific programme should
be directed to the development of interethnic initiatives and projects both in civil society and the eco-
nomic field;
24. Repeats its call for the Commission representation in Skopje to be upgraded to delegation status;25. Hopes that the dialogue now being conducted between Greece and the FYROM within the UN will
result as soon as possible in a name which is acceptable to both sides;
26. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and the Council.
11. Agreement on comitology
A5-0021/2000
European Parliament resolution on the agreement between the European Parliament and the Com-
mission on procedures for implementing Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying
down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission
The European Parliament,
/dash having regard to Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999(1),
/dash having regard to its opinion of 6 May 1999 on the proposal for a Council Decision laying down the
procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(2),
/dash having regard to the agreement concluded with the Commission,/dash having regard to Rule 54 of its Rules of Procedure,
/dash having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A5-0021/2000),
A. whereas Article 8 of the Council Decision of 28 June 1999 confers on the European Parliament a
power of intervention if it considers that implementing powers will be exceeded and whereas insuch cases the Commission is required to re-examine the draft implementing measure, taking accountof Parliament’s resolution, and whereas the Commission must furthermore provide information on theaction it intends to take on the resolution and the reasons for doing so,
B. whereas Article 7(3) of the Decision provides for the European Parliament to be fully informed about
agendas, draft implementing measures arising from legislative acts adopted under codecision whichhave been submitted to committees, the results of voting, provisional summary records of meetings,lists of participants in committees and drafts of implementing measures forwarded to the Council,
(1) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
(2) OJ C 279, 1.10.1999, p. 404.29.11.2000 EN C 339/269 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 17 February 2000