3dash having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,
3dash having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and sport and
the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Researchand Energy (A5-0024/1999);
1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
2. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC
Treaty;
3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parlia-
ment;
4. Calls for the conciliation procedure to be initiated should the Council intend to depart from the text
approved by Parliament;
5. Asks to be consulted again if the Council intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;6. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
8. Restructuring of firms
B5-0185, 0186, 0196 and 0199/1999
European Parliament resolution on the restructuring of firms in the face of globalisation
The European Parliament,
3dash having regard to the 1998-2000 social action programme,3dash having regard to the interim report by the high-level group of experts on the economic and social
implications of industrial changes (Gyllenhammar Group),
3dash having regard to the ILO and UN codes of conduct,3dash having regard to its resolution of 13 November 1996 on industrial restructuring and relocation in the
European Union(
1),
3dash having regard to its resolution of 14 December 1995 on a communication from the Commission
entitled: ‘A level playing field for direct investment world-wide’(2);
A. whereas, in the past, a number of companies were closed down without prior consultation of the
employees concerned, constituting an infringement of the Social Charter, the Social Protocol, Directive75/0129/EEC, amended by Directive 92/0056/EEC, and subsequently Directive 98/0059/EC, on theapproximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies, Directive 94/0045/EC concerning the creation of a European Works Council and the OECD and UN Codes ofConduct,
B. whereas, if the European Union is to enhance its competitiveness and hence rise to the challenge of
global competition and gain an edge over its rivals, it must exploit the wide range of talents, thevaried fund of expertise and the competitive advantage existing in the Member States,
(1) OJ C 362, 2.12.1996, p. 147.
(2) OJ C 17, 22.1.1996, p. 175.5.6.2000 EN C 154/139 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 28 October 1999
C. whereas, although industrial relocation and restructuring are not new developments, their scale and
the bases on which they are occurring have undergone a decisive change in the wake of economicglobalisation,
D. whereas the factors that motivate firms to relocate are manifold, for example, seeking access to emer-
ging markets, circumvention of local content clauses, wage and subsidy competition, ‘free’ infrastruc-ture opportunities and taxavoidance,
E. whereas company relocation can be associated with a range of socio-economic problems in the
regions, for example, increasing levels of long-term unemployment, skills mismatch, decline in pur-chasing power and the loss of key markets for local producers,
F. whereas it is necessary to bring national taxation policies into line with a view to discouraging the
transfer of capital and company relocations on the basis of taxincentives alone;
1. Considers it urgent to shift the basis for international measures in the field of trade and investment
from a relatively narrow focus on growth and the preservation of free trade and investment to the morecomplexgoal of sustainable development, which means taking into account economic efficiency, macro-economic stability, social justice and environmental sustainability;
2. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to eliminate factors preventing all workers
and citizens from taking full advantage of the redistribution of internal market benefits, including theprovisions to be adopted concerning the taxation of border workers and fiscal harmonisation in general;
3. Draws attention to the importance of creating European Works Councils to guarantee the transpar-
ency of relocation and restructuring decisions;
4. Calls on the Commission to seek the incorporation of social clauses in international agreements on
the basis of the five ILO conventions classified as having priority;
5. Takes the view that public policy should seek to enhance the benefits of relocation and mitigate its
potential drawbacks, taking due account of the complexity of industrial relocation;
6. Is of the opinion that any regulatory measures initiated at national or European level should enhance
economic dynamism and not add misplaced social or economic requirements which could have the unin-tended effect of increasing, rather than reducing, unemployment;
7. Takes the view, therefore, that public policy concerning industrial relocation should seek to achieve
the following objectives: a high level of employment, social and economic cohesion, competitiveness ofCommunity industry, sustainable development and fairer distribution of the benefits of free trade;
8. States that, left unattended, certain restructuring processes will not succeed in reconciling the Union’s
three strategic policy objectives: (i) structural adjustment (to raise the overall competitiveness of Europeanfirms in global markets), (ii) social cohesion (to ensure a fair distribution of the costs and benefits ofrelocation of economic activity) and (iii) protection of the environment and non-renewable resources(as a prerequisite for sustainable development throughout the Union);
9. Calls on the Commission to introduce strict monitoring procedures with regard to the relocation of
European Union industry and consider establishing a permanent observatory on these issues;
10. Urges the Commission to take energetic measures to promote investment in training and specialist
skills so as to ensure the necessary adaptability in response to relocations;C 154/140 EN 5.6.2000 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 28 October 1999
11. Is of the opinion that large companies which seek to limit employment for specific reasons should
do so within the framework of a medium- or long-term corporate industrial strategy that justifies thedecision and provides for appropriate social measures;
12. Calls for worker representatives to be included in consultations concerning restructuring and in the
preparation and, where appropriate, the organisation thereof;
13. Points out that, at European level, consultation with worker representatives is provided for only in
the case of collective redundancies and therefore calls on the Council to adopt the directive concerning theinformation and consultation of workers;
14. Calls on the Commission to draw up urgently an evaluation of the application of the directive on
collective redundancies and company closures and to make proposals for effective sanctions, in the eventof non-observance, and to propose improvements to the directive to make it more effective in protectingjobs and defending employees; also calls on the Commission so to reform Community legislation and itsdirectives that the issues referred to in this resolution are taken into consideration;
15. Recalls that Council Directive 98/0059/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the approximation of the
laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies and Council Directive 94/0045/EC of 22 Sep-tember 1994 concerning the creation of works councils or procedures for informing and consulting work-ers in Community-scale undertakings or groups of undertakings must be respected;
16. Insists that the Commission should expedite its review of Directive 94/0045/EC, in particular to
strengthen information and consultation so that it takes place before decision-making, during the planningstage, so as to ensure that information and consultation are effective and that influence can be exercised;calls, furthermore, for the directive to be completed in order to speed up the rate of installation of theseWorks Councils and to give them the capacity to operate autonomously;
17. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the governments
and parliaments of the Member States and the representatives of the two sides of industry.
9. Nuclear test ban treaty
B5-0198, 0200, 0202 and 0203/1999
European Parliament resolution on the US Senate’s rejection of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test
Ban Treaty (CTBT)
The European Parliament,
3dash having regard to the final declaration unanimously adopted at the CTB Conference in Vienna on
8 October 1999,
3dash having regard to the decision of the US Senate on 13 October 1999 to reject the CTBT,3dash having regard to the declarations made by the UN Secretary-General, by the Tampere European Coun-
cil and by various heads of state and government, including the US President, concerning this decisionof the US Senate,
3dash having regard to its earlier resolutions on nuclear disarmament, nuclear proliferation and nuclear test-
ing, including its resolution of 19 November 1998 on the New Agenda Coalition on Nuclear Disarma-ment(
1),
(1) OJ C 379, 7.12.1998, p. 2615.6.2000 EN C 154/141 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 28 October 1999