EN Official Journal of the European Union C 82/7

Corrigendum to the Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain tube and pipe fittings originating in Turkey, Russia, Korea and Malaysia

( Official Journal of the European Union C 31 of 27 January 2018 )

(2018/C 82/06)

On the cover page and on page 16, in the title:

for:

‘Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain tube and pipe fittings originating in Turkey, Russia, Korea and Malaysia’,

read:

‘Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain tube and pipe fittings originating in the Republic of Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia’.

On page 16, footnote 1:

for:

read:

On page 16, first paragraph:

for:

‘Following the publication of a Notice of impending expiry (1) of the anti-dumping measures in force on the imports of certain tube and pipe fittings originating in Turkey, Russia, Korea and Malaysia, the European Commission (“the Commission”) has received a request for review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (2) (“the basic Regulation”).’,

read:

‘Following the publication of two Notices of impending expiry (1) of the anti-dumping measures in force on the imports of certain tube and pipe fittings originating in the Republic of Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia, the European Commission (“the Commission”) has received a request for review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (2) (“the basic Regulation”).’.

On page 16, point 2:

for:

‘The product subject to this review is tube or pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings), of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, currently falling within CN codes ex 7307 93 11, ex 7307 93 19 and ex 7307 99 80 (TARIC codes 7307931191, 7307931193, 7307931194, 7307931195, 7307931199, 7307931991, 7307931993, 7307931994, 7307931995, 7307931999, 7307998092, 7307998093, 7307998094, 7307998095 and 7307998098) (“the product under review”), and originating in Turkey, Russia, Korea and Malaysia.’,

read:

‘The product subject to this review is tube or pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings), of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, currently falling within CN codes ex 7307 93 11, ex 7307 93 19 and ex 7307 99 80 (TARIC codes 7307931191, 7307931193, 7307931194, 7307931195, 7307931199, 7307931991, 7307931993, 7307931994, 7307931995, 7307931999, 7307998092, 7307998093, 7307998094, 7307998095 and 7307998098) (“the product under review”), and originating in the Republic of Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia.’.

On page 16, point 3, first paragraph:

for:

‘The measures currently in force are a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1283/2014 (3), as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/306 (4), against imports from Korea and Malaysia and a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Implementation Regulation (EU) No 78/2013 (5) against imports from Russia and Turkey.’,

read:

‘The measures currently in force are a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1283/2014 (3), as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/306 (4), against imports from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia and a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Implementation Regulation (EU) No 78/2013 (5) against imports from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Turkey.’.

On page 16, point 3, second paragraph:

for:

‘There are also measures in place against the product under review originating in China, which were extended to Taiwan, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and the Philippines (6).’,

read:

‘There are also measures in place against the product under review originating in the People’s Republic of China, which were extended to Taiwan, the Republic of Indonesia, the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, and the Republic of the Philippines (6).’.

On page 17, point 4.1, third paragraph:

for:

‘The allegation of likelihood of recurrence of dumping for Korea is based on a comparison of domestic price with the export price (at ex-works level) of the product under review when sold for export to the US, in view of the absence of significant import volumes from Korea to the Union.’,

read:

‘The allegation of likelihood of recurrence of dumping for the Republic of Korea is based on a comparison of domestic price with the export price (at ex-works level) of the product under review when sold for export to the United States of America, in view of the absence of significant import volumes from the Republic of Korea to the Union.’.

On page 17, point 4.1, fourth paragraph:

for:

‘In the absence of reliable data on domestic prices for Malaysia the allegation of likelihood of recurrence of dumping is based on a comparison of a constructed value (manufacturing costs, selling, general and administrative costs (SG&A) and profit) in Malaysia with the export price (at ex-works level) of the product under review when sold for export to the US, in view of the absence of significant import volumes from Malaysia to the Union.’,

read:

‘In the absence of reliable data on domestic prices for Malaysia the allegation of likelihood of recurrence of dumping is based on a comparison of a constructed value (manufacturing costs, selling, general and administrative costs (SG&A) and profit) in Malaysia with the export price (at ex-works level) of the product under review when sold for export to the United States of America, in view of the absence of significant import volumes from Malaysia to the Union.’.

On page 17, point 4.1, fifth paragraph:

for:

‘On the basis of the above comparisons, which show dumping for the four countries concerned as alleged by the applicant, the Commission considers that there is a likelihood of continuation of dumping from Turkey and Russia and a likelihood of recurrence of dumping from Korea and Malaysia.’,

read:

‘On the basis of the above comparisons, which show dumping for the four countries concerned as alleged by the applicant, the Commission considers that there is a likelihood of continuation of dumping from the Republic of Turkey and the Russian Federation and a likelihood of recurrence of dumping from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia.’.

On page 17, point 4.2, second paragraph:

for:

‘In this respect, the applicant showed that, even after restructuring, the Union industry is still in a fragile situation A revocation of the anti-dumping measures on imports from Turkey, Russia, Korea and Malaysia would lead to a further deterioration of an already difficult situation.’,

read:

‘In this respect, the applicant showed that, even after restructuring, the Union industry is still in a fragile situation. A revocation of the anti-dumping measures on imports from the Republic of Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia would lead to a further deterioration of an already difficult situation.’.

On page 17, point 5.1, second sentence:

for:

‘The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury will cover the period from 1 January 2014 to the end of the investigation period (“the period considered”).’,

read:

‘The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury will cover the period from 1 January 2014 to the end of the review investigation period (“the period considered”).’.

On page 18, point 5.2.1, first paragraph:

for:

‘Procedure for selecting exporting producers to be investigated in Turkey, Russia, Korea and Malaysia’,

read:

‘Procedure for selecting exporting producers to be investigated in the Republic of Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia.’.

On page 18, point 5.2.2, first paragraph:

for:

‘Unrelated importers of the product under review from Russia, Turkey, Korea and Malaysia to the Union, including those that did not cooperate in the investigation leading to the measures in force are invited to participate in this investigation.’,

read:

‘Unrelated importers of the product under review from the Russian Federation, the Republic of Turkey, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia to the Union, including those that did not cooperate in the investigation leading to the measures in force are invited to participate in this investigation.’.

On page 22, in Annex I, first title:

for:

‘ANTI-DUMPING PROCEEDING CONCERNING IMPORTS OF TUBE AND PIPE FITTINGS ORIGINATING IN TURKEY, RUSSIA, KOREA AND MALAYSIA’,

read:

‘ANTI-DUMPING PROCEEDING CONCERNING IMPORTS OF CERTAIN TUBE AND PIPE FITTINGS ORIGINATING IN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY, THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA AND MALAYSIA’.

On page 22, in Annex I, second title:

for:

‘INFORMATION FOR THE SELECTION OF THE SAMPLE OF EXPORTING PRODUCERS IN TURKEY, RUSSIA, KOREA AND MALAYSIA’,

read:

‘INFORMATION FOR THE SELECTION OF THE SAMPLE OF EXPORTING PRODUCERS IN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY, THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA AND MALAYSIA’.

On page 22, in Annex I, first paragraph:

for:

‘This form is designed to assist exporting producers in Turkey, Russia, Korea and Malaysia in responding to the request for sampling information made in point 5.2.1 of the Notice of initiation.’,

read:

‘This form is designed to assist exporting producers in the Republic of Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia in responding to the request for sampling information made in point 5.2.1 of the Notice of initiation.’.

On page 24, in Annex II, first title:

for:

‘ANTI-DUMPING PROCEEDING CONCERNING IMPORTS OF TUBE AND PIPE FITTINGS ORIGINATING IN TURKEY, RUSSIA, KOREA AND MALAYSIA’,

read:

‘ANTI-DUMPING PROCEEDING CONCERNING IMPORTS OF CERTAIN TUBE AND PIPE FITTINGS ORIGINATING IN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY, THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA AND MALAYSIA’.

On page 24, in Annex II, point 2, first sentence:

for:

‘For the review investigation period as defined in Section 5.1 of the Notice of initiation, indicate the total turnover in euros (EUR) of the company, and the turnover and volume for imports into the Union (2) and resales on the Union market after importation from Turkey, Russia, Korea and Malaysia and the corresponding volume of the product under review as defined in the Notice of initiation and originating in the country concerned.’,

read:

‘For the review investigation period as defined in Section 5.1 of the Notice of initiation, indicate the total turnover in euros (EUR) of the company, and the turnover and volume for imports into the Union (2) and resales on the Union market after importation from the Republic of Turkey, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia and the corresponding volume of the product under review as defined in the Notice of initiation and originating in the country concerned.’.

On page 24, in Annex II, point 2, in the table, first column, third row:

for:

‘Resales on the Union market after importation from Turkey, Russia, Korea and Malaysia of the product under review’,

read: