ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(75)409
Vol.1975/0158

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement (CEE,Euratom) n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernant l'ouverture aupublicdesarchiveshistoriques delaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement (CE,Euratom) n°1700/2003 du22septembre 2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003, p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation (EEC,Euratom) No354/83of1February 1983
concerning theopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropean Economic
Community andtheEuropean AtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983, p.1),as
amended byRegulation (EC,Euratom) No1700/2003 of22September 2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003, p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary, classifieddocuments inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformity withArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung (EWG,Euratom) Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar 1983überdieFreigabe derhistorischen Archive derEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom) Nr.1700/2003 vom22.September 2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003, S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit
erforderlich, wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenannten Verordnung freigegeben.

COMMISSION 0FTHBSUSOTSAKJ GOMMIU^TIES
COM(75)409 final
Brussels .24July 1975
COMMISSION REPORT TCTHE COUNCIL
OilTHEOPERATION OFREGULATION (EEC )No517/72
(REGULAR AND SPECIAL REGULAR SERVICES )IN1973
COMMISSION REPORT TOTHE COUNCIL
ONTHE STATE OPTHE TRANSPORT MARKET ASREGARDS
THE SHUTTLE SERVICES REFERRED TOINARTICLE 11
OFREGULATION (EEC )No516/72
(submitted totheCouncil bytheCommission )
COÏ.K75 )409final

COMMISSION REPORT TOTTIECOUNCIL OHTHEOPERATION OPREGULATION (EEC)No*17/12
CONCERNING REGULAR ANDSPECIAL REGULAR SERVICES IN1973
I.INTRODUCTION
CouncilRegulation (EEC;No517/72of28February 1972ontheintroduc­
tionofcommonrulesforregularandspecialregularservices bycoachand"bus
betweenMemberStates^"hasappliedintheoriginalMemberStatessince
21January1973.Article23(b)oftheRegulation postponed application inthe
newMemberStatesuntil1July1973.
Article15ofRegulation (EEC)No517/72stipulates :"theCommission
shalleachyearsendareportontheoperation ofthisRegulation totheCouncil.
Thisreporthasbeendraftedincompliance withthisprovision .Itcovers
thewholeof1973inthecaseoftheoriginal MemberStatesandthesecondhalf
of1973inthecaseofthenewMemberStates.Interaliaitspurposeisto:
-indicate trendsintransport connections andservices ,
-a,ssesstheefficiency oftheprocedures adopted,
-ascertain ,whereappropriate ,theeconomic impactoftheRegulation ,
-identify thescaleofinfringement .
Inadditionthereportmakesitpossibletoexaminewaysinwhich,in
thelightofexperience ,theRegulation couldbeamended.
Toobtaintheinformation requiredfordraftingthisreporttheCom­
missionsentaquestionnaire toMemberStateson22July1974«
OJNoL67,20March1972,page19
2Article 1ofCouncilRegulation (EEC)No2442/72of21November 1972-
CJNoL265,24November 1972,page7«

II.MEMB3RSTATES/REPLIES AM)TECCOMPASSION 'SVlff-fS
A.Trendsin"trafficservices andconnections
Thestatistics provided byMemberStateshavebeencollated invarious
summarytablesannexedtothisreport.However,theyaretoofragmentary to
permitsufficiently reliable conclusions ontrendsintrafficservices and
connections .Everyeffortwillbemadetoobtainfullerstatistics intine
forthenextreport.
B.Procedures
1.NoMemberStateneededtomakeuseofthenegotiating procedure provided
forbyArticle13(l)oftheRegulation withaviewtoreachingagreement onan
application tointroduce ,changeorwithdraw aregularorspecialregularser­
viceortorenewanauthorization .
Nocasesofdisputehavebeenreferred totheCommission forsettlement
underthesecondsubparagraph ofArticle14(1).Itcantherefore beconcluded
thatasaresultoftheprocedure introduced bytheCommunity Regulation the
MemberStateshavenotencountered anymajordifficulties whentakingdecisions
onapplications bycarriers .
2.However ,Belgiumfeltthatitshouldberecommended thatthecompetent
authorities ofeachState,whenconsulted byaMemberStateaboutanapplica­
tion,shouldreplyassoonaspossible ,byadeadline tobelaiddownat
Community level,sothatthetime-lag betweenthedateoftheapplication and
thedatewhenthedecisiontaJceseffect(onemonthafteritsnotification to
theotherMemberStates-Article13(4))isnottoolong.
Although theCommission considers thattheprocedure forexamining
applications shouldbeasexpeditious aspossible ,itisdoubtful whetherit
wouldbepossible tofixauniform maximumtime-limit inviewofthediffe-y
rencesbetweentheadministrative structures oftherespective MemberStates.
Nonetheless theCommission invitestheMemberStatestospeeduptheprocedure .

3.SomeMeriberStatesconsidered itregrettable that,inviewofthetime
requiredforissuingauthorizations ,theRegulation didnotprovideforthe
issuingof"temporary authorizations "tomeeturgenttransport requirements .
Theytherefore advocate anamendment toprovidefortheissueof"temporary
authorizations "foronemonthormoretocarriersproviding servicesnecessi­
tatedbytheimmediate requirements ofusers,pendingcompletion ofthe
procedural formalities (consultation oftheMemberStates,datesonwhich
decisions takeeffect). .
TheCommission pointsoutthatArticle 19ofitsoriginal proposalfor
aregulationprovidedforthepossibility ofissuingatemporaryauthorization ^
butthatthisproposal wasnotapproved bytheCouncil.Havingalsonotedthat
someMemberStatesstilldidnotfeeltheneedforsuchaprocedure ,orwere
evenopposedto-it,theCommission willexaminetheadvisability ofproposing
an<amendment totheregulation ,wherenecessary ,whichwouldempowerthose
Statesthatsowishedtomakebilateral agreements fortheissuingofsuoh
authorizations .
4.Asregardsinfringements ,Italywastheonlycoimtrytofindthatthe
documents whichhavetobepresent ,onboardvehicles werenotalwaysproperly
kept.Theundertakings concerned wereservednoticetocomplywiththerules.
Kbadministrative orjudicialpenaltywasimposed.
IntheCommission 'sopinionthefactthattherewerehardlyanyinfringe­
mentsischieflytobeattributed totherelative stringency ofthearrangements
introduced ,particularly asregardstheselection ofcarriers andthecondi­
tionsstipulated intheauthorization fortheoperation oftheservice.
OJNoC123,19September 19°9»P&g©1

-5-
C.Econonic imoactoftheRégulation
TheMemberStatesfeltthattheintroduction oftheCommunity Regula­
tionhadhardlyaffectedtheeconomicsituation §however ,eveniftheRegula­
tionhasnotcreatedanynewtrafficithasatleastledtobetterorganization .
TheCommission isoftheopinionthatnotenoughexperience hasyetbeen
gainedandthatfurtherinformation ,particularly concerning themeetingof
needsandtheeffectsoncoordination ,couldprobably besuppliedinfuture
reports .
D.Amendments proposed andothersuggest:ons
1.Article22ofRegulation (EEC)No517/72stipulates interaliathatthe
provisions tobeadoptedbytheMemberStatestoimplement theRegulation shall
alsocoverpenalties applicable intheeventofinfringements ,andinparticular
failuretoprovidethenoticerequiredunderthefirstsubparagraph ofArticle10(
TheUnitedKingdomconsidersthatArticle10(l),whichprovides :"Anauthoriza­
tionshalllapsethreemonthsafterthecompetent authority hasreceived from
itsholdernoticeofhisintention towithdraw theservice",doesnotrequire
thecarriertoinformthecompetent authority ofhisintention and,consequently ,
failuretogivenotification cannotconstitute aninfringement .
TheCommission cannotacceptthisinterpretation sincetheobligation ,
evenifnotspecifically stated,isimplicitintheprovisions referredto.
ItpointsoutthattheotherMemberStateshavehadnodifficulty inprovi­
dingforappropriate penalties inthisconnection .Itistheresponsibility
oftheUnitedKingdomtointroduce thoseimplementing measuresunderArticle22
oftheRegulation whichwouldenableittopenalisefailuretogivenotice.
•••/••o

2. Another problem raised "bytheUnited Kingdom concerns thesecond sub­
paragraph ofArticle 10(l ),which states :"Theholder oftheauthorization
shall notify inanappropriate manner thepublic andthepassengers concerned
ofhisintention ,towithdraw theservice ."As"inanappropriate manner "is
notdefined intheRegulation ,theUnited Kingdom Government suggests -that a
Community definition ofthephrase beadopted .assoon -aspossible . ~■
TheCommission feels that there isnoneed todraw upaCommunity ;
definition .However ,itsuggests that theMenber States inform itofthe
procedure used ,sothat itcanguarantee theexchange ofinformation between
Member States .
3. Article 20ofRegulation (HEC)HO517/72states that inthecase ofa
regular service oraspecial regular service operated intheterritory of
only twoMember States over aroute ofless than 100kmlying within azone
extending toadepth oneach side ofthefrontier notexceeding 50kmasthe
crow flies ,theMember States concerned may ,under their agreement pursuant r
toArticle 13(l),waive certain requirements listed inArticle 20.
TheUnited Kingdom Government hasasked whether ornotthedistance
travelled bysea ,between itscountry andanother Member State should be
included inthese distances .
TheCommission notes that there isalacuna here intheRegulation .
Itconsiders that Article 20should beamended tocover seacrossings byadding
toitthesame provision asthat inserted ,with thesame purpose ,intheFirst
Council Directive onthe establishment ofcommon rules forcertain types of
4carriage ofgoods byroad between Member States i
OJIToL84»28March 1974 »page 8

"Inthecase ofcarriage "between Member States whose territories are
separated solely byanarea ofsea ,noaccount shall betaken ofthedistance
travelled onboard ameans ofseatransport specially constructed andequipped
forthecarriage ofcommercial vehicles andoperated asaregular service ."
TheCommission will therefore present aformal proposal totheCouncil ,
assoon aspossible ,with theobject ofmodifying Regulation (EEC)¥0.517/72
intheabove-© enti oned sense . ,
E.Miscellrjieous
Atameeting ofgovernment experts convened bytheCommission for .
drawing upthis report ,some delegations felt that there waslittle noed to
present areport every year ontheapplication ofRegulation (EEC)NO517/72,
asprovided forinArticle 15ofthat Regulation .They felt that theinforma­
tion relevant tothis report could begathered annually butthat thereport
1
itself should bedrawn uponly every three orfive years .Other delegations
were infavour ofsimplifying theprocedure andsuggested that theCommission
should send thoreport direct totheMember States andnolonger totheCouncil .
TheCommission cannot agree tothelatter suggestion butitcould
accept thesolution ofdrawing upareport every three years .
Atthis meeting some delegations raised thequestion ofwhether itwas
advisable tobegin work ondrawing upauniform model foropdr-.bing rules to
implement theprovisions ofArticle 5(^)ofRegulation (EEC)ifc5–A2.They
stated that -theabsence ofsuch urifcra operating rules hadnotcreated 'aay
!
:difficulties *
TheCommission hastaken note ofthese unofficial opinions andwill
undertake amore detailed examination ofthequestion .

-8-
COMMISSION REPORT TOTHE COUNCIL PITTHE STATE OFTHE TRAITS PORT MARKET AS
REGARDS THESHUTTLE SERVICES REFERRED TOINARTICLE 11OPREGULATION (EEC )NO516fro
I.IÎJTRODUCTION
Article 11(l)ofRegulation Mo516/72states :"Ifcrwayofderogation from
Article 2(3)ofRegulation No117/56/EEC,acarrier may ,inthecase ofpassengers _
coming from non-member countries andformed into groups atanairport onarrival "by
air ,orataport onarrival "bysea ,under acontract concluded before their
arrival inthecountry where they aretobetaken up,apply forauthorization to
make thefirst outward journey andthelast return journey ofaseries unladen ."
Under Article 11(2 )ofRegulation No516/72authorizations mayalso begranted
inother cases .Lastly ,under Article 11(3 )theCommission must ,before theend
ofJune 1975 >present totheCouncil areport onthestate ofthetransport market
inthis partictilar field ,"reverse shuttle services ",ifnecessary together with
aproposal toamend the scope ofArticle 11.
Toobtain theneoessary information fordrawing upthis report ,the
Commission sent aquestionnaire ,dated 22July 1974t "totheMember States .
II.MEMBER STATES 'REPLIES AND THE COMMISSION' SVIEH5 . ;
1. Thereplies received indicate that theshuttle services concerned are
fewandfarbetween .Indeed ,there were noapplications fortheintroduction
ofsuch services inBelgium ,Denmark ,Ireland ,Italy ,Luxembourg ,theNether­
lands ortheUnited Kingdom .Germany hasreported that applications ofthis
kind were turned down because oftheunfavourable effect theoperation of
such services could have onnational carriers .

-9-
For -theperiod running fron theentry into force oftheRegulation ,
France hassupplied thefollowing figures :
-nuriber ofapplications forauthorization to .
operate shuttle services with accommodation 1
-number ofauthorizations issued for the
operation ofshuttle services with accomnodation 1
-number ofapplications forauthorization to
operate shuttle services without accommodation 2
-number ofauthorizations issued for the
operation ofshuttle services without accommodation 2
These three authorizations were issued toanItalian undertaking
which ,incarrying outtheservices concerned ,
made 47journeys ,
carried 3,182 persons and
Covered 18,840 kilometers .
2. Onthesubject ofinfringements ,Belgium reported that in1972 and
1973 Belgian inspection departments discovered that afewunauthorized .
"reverse shuttle services "were being operated bycarriers ofanother Member
State .Belgium wasunable toimpose penalties atthetime "because theentry
into force ofthelegislation required hadbeen delayed .
3. Because ofthis situation ,theCommission considers that there areno
grounds foramending theprovisions setoutinArticle 11ofRegulation (EEC)
Ho516/72.

1.Trendsintransport services andconnections
1.1Periodpreceding implementation oftheRegulation
(&)Servicesintroduced sndkncovered
i REGULARSERVICES , ... SPECIAL REGULARSERVICES
■*'•••■ . ■■
UKj.ELiIj!,.IIRL
iDK0!
!iE!TotalTransport
operationsTotal Β|G
IIDK
IΡIRLiI
I
ILEL;UK
□t
i1X 1Buriber
BELGIUM '
km .
J11Γ*2 6ι
2I
1i
i
mm 583 X3.83 -616'"Ί
•110 324t•
t43'1'1\
134I
[2 1 xi 27ÎJuuber
GERÎOY
km |.57 X 40 i 1116
ILJLJiΓΠ
χ -i■m
IMowajΓ
XΓ■
L~Number
DEHMiRK
kmI xΓΊΠ!III■!Il■
I
Ιμμβμ]L_JLJI– I_Jf
χΓΊη■'■■■■■
i I Xffumber ...
FRANCE
km1 ■1Πχ
I–''i LxJIII
jLΓΊI
U–L-jи–xNumber .
IRELAUD
km !iπΓΊπι■■■■ii i
!ΧLMMJ ΠΠΓΊruπΓΊ!
L-J
1 II"M■l''''LJLJr
I
ι.........ЖггаЪехГ 1
ITALY j
lem iΠΊ
ι
IbuI
ι L–!; ΓΊηI
IL-Sj IJ I,–
L■■■––(
ïïumber i; 1 ■■■■i
!-.t.Ir–
I I\'
"1
iX!î
ILUXEMBOURG
km|j
ι ι II
\
I
IXi
ι
!xi,IlI
I11
Iïïumber
UETHERLAHDS
km|29■i^iini^
I....11"\
i i
II
Iiπr
i
iX
i... 1LJ l!–1
:– i
i I!■!■>>!1 Ii II
I
]■XI'■'■)
UL!J
!Ii
i
it■■■1■–
!
I Mtimber {_Jη
I
II–-–1
■î~\!
i
I
KdMMtiil
i
vwkwwatai !
u.,–!
L..."„,1шптш)кшсбом
fefiL 'i i
i• «МИМММ
I I

0; :o.::r7rcv*;Cvröcnnd-kn -covorod
V/fciai,jBn^un WW<M»>*mim«nu«IW»im–FM ■■> *'"«*f,TTV?V
Regularservices Specialregularservices
UK
I
»im»
iM
11
IIRL
II
1.^DK
IîBTotalTransport j
opérations 1|Total
liBLl_DK ΡIRLjI;
ti^i
ÎUK
ni i
!'L±t iLu:Γ76X...47Uumber
BELGIUM
km302 X17 15L23iJП
832 .1115r1268 X_,7.4031
17.242 ! !81513277rn
LZJi
-4 A.L=_XI-,.8•Uumber !
GEBIÎMÏ |
km jI'.ιι X_7_Γ7r:4π
-XI i
i""■I XΓΓ Π-ΓΗΓΠ
"-m* χ1Huxaber . 1
DENMARK j
km jГГrΓ7Пπ□ XΓ-ΠΓrππ
i
1I
L-ι–
I1
.zjΓΠI-9!11 20lîumber .j
FRANCE '
km |■I
2!L2j X -π_jr –~
X 320i119221
7.332 1I
L_150.150 !•■"1,1"i
xIrГЛ
1
1
1__._.X ! IL i......1!Number .._.j
IRELAKD ;
km !1-
iί■I„JX
Iπ
L-□ χI 160 i1
lL'X■ mt
I',L* 1i 1Ί
_22*Number ,.1
ITALY j
km |I ■
i, „1Γ7ππ
!.i
1...mJL_jd•11– lL_i
L_,!8.694* X1•1
1 I1! !
L«J[
Ir ■■'■'"I
IHumber • !
LUXEMBOURG
kmn ΓΊηΠ
. 1
! 1r 1 ! 1
!■
1...ί !
^ I I•"ΓΙr-1
χ L I"Iι- Number
UETHERLAHDS
kn7'1'"" 1Ί
l
Xi
i1
I■ ■r
i
Xi...i !I
I.-• Ir 1
....,
1!!Ilîumber
UNITED KI1TC3I
I1011"i!■■■
,,„,
•I"Ίχ
UL-j•-1-■»-j-j I!–
I-1"■"■•
--..» ...
I
I1_j IΓ–Γ~1
I
?
I
ITodistinction liasbeenmadebetweenregularservicesandspecialregularservices ,
•••/

-3-
ЛЖЕХ
(c)^uriberauthorizations issuedtooperatenational "transportservices
inthecourseofoperation ofaninternational service
Nil-
(&)Numberofauthorizations withdrawn •
llil
(e)Nuriberofserviceswithdravm
RegularServicesммшааюммйитинаатаммямммммммш )
Spécialremilarservices
F i
II
i
i~ELTotal j
JTransport I
i
operations ii.P I
j1
_JTotai
!
3ι –
11:4I0Ш1Ж • I
I I11 11
Total
Grandtotal=259**
1**
14EETH2RLAM)S *
ITALÏ*
*Hodistinction has"beenmadebetweenregularservices andspecial
regularservices. '
**Nobreakdown bytypeoftransport operation withotherMemberStates
wassupplied.

(a)Servicesintroduced andkmcovered .
Kegularservices Specialregularservices
ЦХ ,UL"
[rr
fiIRLFDK G
1Β ■Total iTransport
opérationsTotal I
»
«IΒG!
iIDKiPi
I !
i ijIRL
i
iIjiL ;ML !
j I
lUK
□ir ■■■■n
i !i
t,
Number
BELGIUM
kmirti30X!i"Ί
iniI111
I1I'■' I
I.13ΓΊ
1I»■|
IM!■■■<»
II !
I_.-.IrIi
I i X 1.703I
X;76I
i0^ 855Юmu.l^GJ 1 7!'4IXj128Nuraber
GERMANY
kmI
5ZJГЛL_4oj□ 116m
ι·iι
ixjrTi!-JIΊΠ- ■1!ΓΊ
I
!. ! ii jxjNumber
DEHMARK
km1-J!ηπ !ΓΊ
1ΧiίΧ]πΓΊΓ––ΗΓΊLJ 18Ir
I
I X 3'23Number
FRANCE
km1I1XΓΊIΓΊm
LJLdIvI
iXIΊ
101!J34m. 39.159ΓΊΓΊΓΊΓΊΗm
LJLjUι
INumber
IRELAND
km'Xi! I
f1|J1■»
t j
!
-Iu 1x
;ι
LΠ χΓΊ
■–ιx!muaber
ITALY
km1
_IΓΊΓΊ
I
-1.....Μί..11■Ud LLΠΓΊIΤΓΓΊ
|«юнммш1uuuMIfumber
LUXEMBOURG
knΓΊi :nΓΊ–
UL_J!XMLJUUr
!n| :
i !i–
II
iX­
X|I jLJI
lJ 2jNumber
|NETHERLANDS |
!km ■ .i| i
i-I1Π
X
!
ι,·.*uiMU– iηi 1ΓΊI=Η
IYu! ![■■«*iiii*4I
ιi
1JιI
;ijNumber
UNITED KINCDC
km I■■■■■4
t• !ПIΓΊ !IT
Ix!! ! i
" 1 11I! I!_J! I
L!ί
I
–.....ii
..■-,iят"
I=_!■■■ ■
ii– iLJ–I
-J–pih '■
!i-Ii
:X
Nodistinction hasbeenmadebetweenregularservicesandspecialregularservices.

(b)Aut-icriaatiousrenewedandkaooverwd •
j Regularservices Specialregularservices j
UK
iNL'L
iI i
•i
iiIRL
IΡDK G
!B
iTotal !Transport Total
Ioperations jΒ!
ιG|DK
5Ρ 1
I 1IRLIL1JLUK
21 i
I_ 1
i~ i12 8 1X22!Number j
'BELGIUM ]
km j!1JXI
Iiб
i
300 1| !
i-JI
l2585_1851I~–
LxuU36j Lp5S.'1
Xi734!
I_
■324 ! -i
L-J--–1,1π
L~I
I
Iχ ■1iNuaber
GERMNY
km'- I1
I 1
!x1
1 !
1I...
I-1■■■1
IV
!
L.."_□I
Iχ1
!- 1□XIπ
L_J1
I
L_. [X1- I INimber
DEHMARK
kraI
XjI
II
I
I■ 1r–1–■r ;■■-■
! !
■ \I
I I
i iΓ '
Lx1 ;□1
11
»
I !
IXI□UuEiber
FRANCE
ka□1LU1■1■*r1
L 1
i!_j■ "1
ί I
ί._ .XI
X ΗΊ
IΊ
Lχ!
iNumber
IRELAND
kmΠLX_I .I
i
I
I.Π xr
I□IXI
I :I
I 21*Number
I'ITALY
IkanX1
tI
XI
8.334 Iπ– i
LxI..j!
1
L_Jr1
L! !
1ι
1
L iίΜIINur.iber
i-LUXEMBOURG
IkmΠ
iΠ χ■■■■
L__j
iX\1Jπt'
1-nΠI
LXI1
ί
!
Xi i
1 i1
iI I1■"H'
iNumber
!NETHERLANDS
'knΠ'1
xJ:
!&.–i
i i
1 1r
1 ! I ■ΠI■ΜΗρΗΜ
' .Ir– 1
!XiI
x! 1ii 1
iI ! !
i 'I
i!Nuiaber ]
■UNITED KINGD
km I./>*» ,–r–1
liI iΊΧί
i r 1
! I iI
jI
ir–1
1|!
I1
■■»11Ii i
t 'i.....1...11.11ii.iΓ
Ixj
*Nodistinction hasbeenmadebetweenregularservicesandspecialregularservices.

-6-
А1ШХ
(c)Numberofauthorizations issuedtooperatenationaltransport ,services
inthecourseofoperation oftui'international service i
Nil
(d)Numberofauthorizations withdrawn pursuanttoArticlel3(l)
Hil ■
(e)Numberofserviceswithdrawn
'■■111·■" '
.,,_,–_._. .. ------------ -ίΡ-I»I
!TOTAL
!
BELGrJM*' !Π
■1•I2 3
ITALY* 2**
ii ».iI GRANDTOTAL |
!11l■ 1..... mi5
'*Nodistinction hasbeenmadebetweenregularservices andspecialregular
services .
**'Nobreakdown .bytypeoftransport operation withothprMenberStateswas
•supplied .. ...