3. Asks to be consulted again if the Council intends to amend the Kingdom of Sweden initiative sub-
stantially;
4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the government of
the Kingdom of Sweden.
11. Chernobyl
B5-0321, 0322, 0323, 0324 and 0325/2001
European Parliament resolution on the problem of nuclear safety fifteen years after the Chernobyl
accident, and its health consequences
The European Parliament,
 having regard to its resolution of 18 September 1997 on the closure of the Chernobyl nuclear power
plant by 2000 and completion of Khmelnitsky-2 and Rovno-4 nuclear reactors in Ukraine (1),
 having regard to Euratom Directive 96/29 on basic radiation standards, having regard to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) concerning the closure of Chernobyl
between the G7 countries and the Ukraine, signed in Ottawa on 20 December 1995,
A. whereas Chernobyl closed on 15 December 2000, 14 years after the explosion at the reactor resulting
in the worlds worst civil nuclear disaster,
B. whereas the Ukraine has complied with the MOU and closed Chernobyl, and the G7 and EU have
agreed to fund the completion of two further nuclear reactors at Khmelnitsky and Rovno, known asK2R4,
C. whereas the accident in unit four of the Chernobyl nuclear power station on 26 April 1986 caused
the immediate deaths of workers, heavily contaminated the whole region in todays Russia, Ukraineand Belarus and spread nuclear isotopes throughout Europe,
D. noting that, although one of the most radioactive areas in the world, this region is still inhabited, and
that cancers, particularly thyroid cancer, leukaemias and other serious and often fatal illnesses are stilloccurring there 15 years after the accident,
E. whereas the accepted model of radiation risk was unable to predict the emergence of the illnesses now
arising as a result of radiation,
F. whereas Belarus alone is thought to have absorbed over 80 % of the radioactive dust,
G. having regard to the 5 years of negotiations between the Ukrainian Government and the G7 Group of
industrialised countries and whereas the G7 and EU have agreed to a loan for reform of the Ukrainesenergy sector, stabilisation of the Chernobyl sarcophagus and completion of the half-built nuclearreactors Khmelnitsky-2 and Rovno-4, known as K2R4, as part of a package of energy options forreplacing power from Chernobyl,
H. whereas the commitment of € 1 billion by the EU and its Member States will constitute the largest
single contribution towards compensating the Ukraine for decommissioning the Chernobyl plant,
(1) OJ C 304, 6.10.1997, p. 113.C 27 E/78 EN 31.1.2002 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 3 May 2001
I. whereas the Chernobyl nuclear accident has already caused a considerable number of casualties and
will still have disastrous effects on health for years to come, both for those exposed to radiation at thetime of the accident and for future generations, and concerned by the fact that the workforce ismigrating from contaminated areas to clean ones, creating labour and professional shortages andthat the social and economic status of people living and working in the contaminated territories isheavily dependent on state subsidies,
J. drawing attention to the dependence of the Ukraine on oil and gas supplies from Russia and Central
Asia and to the plans to diversify sources of supply, in particular the construction of gas and oilpipelines from Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan,
K. whereas strong public concern in the European Union remains with respect to the safety of other
nuclear power plants in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, and the lessons of Chernobylshould serve as a constant warning in this regard,
1. Welcomes unreservedly the closure of Chernobyl;
2. Stresses once more the absolute need for the Ukraine to have a long-term coherent and sustainable
energy policy, in which efficiency and saving measures with tough targets, elimination of losses in energytransmission and distribution and the implementation of proper market mechanisms should be of funda-mental importance; considers that the EU, in particular through the TACIS programme, can help theUkraine to achieve its much-needed objectives in the energy field, namely by making more use of renew-able energy sources;
3. Asks the Commission to ensure that support is given to the construction of oil and gas pipelines
from Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan;
4. Believes that the sarcophagus must be turned into an ecologically safe system; notes the Commis-
sions pledge of € 100 million in July 2000 to the Shelter Fund to help rehabilitate the sarcophagus, butfurther notes that the EBRD-managed project still requires much work to make the damaged unit safe;
5. Calls on the EU, in close cooperation with the national authorities of the candidate countries, as well
as with the other countries concerned, to learn all the lessons from this disaster and give its full support tothe precautionary principle, which dictates that it is essential to close and dismantle nuclear power stationsat risk in these countries; notes that Commission funding has been used to finance a Business Devel-opment Agency, the aim of which is to cushion the social impact of Chernobyls closure on the localpopulation;
6. Demands continuous measurement of radioactivity to enable the effects of radiation on soil, air,
water, flora and fauna to be assessed scientifically, and hopes that the consumption of food from thisregion will be strictly prohibited;
7. Supports all efforts to research the long-term health and environmental impact of the Chernobyl
disaster and projects to study, assess and mitigate the consequences of the Chernobyl accident; thereforecalls for financial help to be made available to the Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, to enable them to cope
with the enormous social and health consequences of the Chernobyl disaster, and stresses that mortality in
the region will depend very much on the quality and intensity of the treatment given to the personsaffected;
8. Appreciates, given that the health aspect of Chernobyl is now the crucial question, the fact that the
WHO is holding its own conference in June 2001, and that it is not participating with the IAEA in theChernobyl 15th Anniversary Conference;
9. Expresses its concern about the massive increase in thyroid cancers, especially in children, in the
three countries most affected and about the significant increases in many types of health disorders;31.1.2002 EN C 27 E/79 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 3 May 2001
10. Calls for continued and increased efforts to restore the environment in the most contaminated
regions, utilising the information and expertise of the IAEA and other bodies, and urges the G7 and theEU to give more consideration to management of the whole contaminated environment, especially forestsand bodies of water, because of the interaction between them and agricultural land;
11. Based on new scientific evidence suggesting doubts about aspects of the radiation risk model, par-
ticularly as regards the effects of the Chernobyl fall-out, requests the Commission to arrange an epidemi-ological study of the effects of Chernobyl throughout Europe as a whole; also calls on the IAEA andUnscear, as well as the ICRP and Euratom, to re-examine the risk model;
12. Believes that closer cooperation and dialogue between the Ukrainian Parliament and the European
Parliament on energy-related matters is essential;
13. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Presidents and
Parliaments of the Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, the Secretary-General of the UN, the IAEA, the WHO, the
Unscear and the ICRP.
12. Veterinary medicinal products
A5-0119/2001
European Parliament resolution on the Commission communication to the Council and the Euro-
pean Parliament on availability of veterinary medicinal products (COM(2000) 806  C5-0105/2001
 2001/2054(COS))
The European Parliament,
 having regard to the communication from the Commission (COM(2000) 806  C5-0105/2001), having regard to Council Directive 81/851/EEC of 28 September 1981 on the approximation of the
laws of the Member States relating to veterinary medicinal products (
1),
 having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 of 26 June 1990 laying down a Community
procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in food-stuffs of animal origin (
2),
 having regard to Commission Decision 2000/68/EC of 22 December 1999 amending Commission
Decision 93/623/EEC and establishing the identification of equidae for breeding and production (3),
 having regard to the Note for Guidance of the Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products (CVMP)
of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products on the risk analysis approach forresidues of veterinary medicinal products in food of animal origin (EMEA/CVMP/187/00-FINAL),
 having regard to the formal noting by the Commission at a meeting of the Council on 14 December
1999 (Council ref. 14171/99) that Member States need not withdraw certain drugs pending the adop-tion of legislative proposals,
 having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure, having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy
(A5-0119/2001),
(1) OJ L 317, 6.11.1981, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 23, 28.1.2000, p. 72.C 27 E/80 EN 31.1.2002 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 3 May 2001