4. Considers that the demands made by the US for an indefinite suspension of the EU Regulation are
totally unacceptable and will entail an unsustainable situation in the EU exposing people to noise levelswhich endanger their health and quality of life;
5. Considers that the densely populated areas of the EU pose specific problems, with around 20% of
the Union’s population suffering from noise levels that scientists and health experts consider to be unac-ceptable(
1), with an increasing share represented by air traffic noise;
6. Welcomes the progress being made within CAEP (Committee on Aviation Environment Protection)
in the ICAO, towards a new standard on noise and strategy for phasing out the noisiest aircraft and calls
on the Member States and the US to accelerate the progress towards a successful agreement at the fifthmeeting of CAEP;
7. Will only consider a limited review of Regulation (EC) No 925/1999 concerning the provisions for
aeroplanes registered in third countries before these provisions enter into force in April 2002, on thecondition that the US administration makes a written, binding commitment, including a timetable notexceeding the end of 2001, to attain world-wide standards similar to or more stringent than those laiddown in the said Regulation;
8. Underlines its unwillingness to consider a further postponement of Regulation (EC) No 925/1999
concerning the provisions for aeroplanes registered in a Member State;
9. Asks the US to withdraw its action under Article 84 of the Chicago Convention on International
Civil Aviation pending a global agreement and urges the US not to resort to other retaliatory measures,but instead to take a constructive approach in negotiating high global standards within the ICAO in part-nership with the EU;
10. Calls on the Member States, with the support of the Commission, to coordinate their efforts within
the ICAO in order to get the best possible outcome for EU environmental objectives on aircraft noisestandards;
11. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and the govern-
ments and parliaments of the Member States as well as to the US Administration, Senate and House of
Representatives.
(1) Green Paper on Future Noise Policy (COM(1996) 540).
4. Mediterranean policy
B5-0297, 0298, 0300, 0303 and 0304/2000
European Parliament resolution on Mediterranean policy
The European Parliament,
Odash having regard to Articles 17, 18, 21 and 22 of the EU Treaty,
Odash having regard to its resolution of 11 October 1995on the Mediterranean policy of the European
Union with a view to the Barcelona Conference(1),
Odash having regard to its resolution of 14 December 1995on the Euro-Mediterranean Conference in Bar-
celona(2),
Odash having regard to its resolution of 13 March 1997 on the joint report by the Presidency of the Council
and the Commission on Mediterranean policy(3),
(1) OJ C 287, 30.10.1995, p. 121.
(2) OJ C 17, 22.1.1996, p. 178.
(3) OJ C 115, 14.4.1997, p. 159.29.12.2000 EN C 378/71 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 30 March 2000
Odash having regard to its resolution of 11 March 1999 on the CommissionCommunication entitled ‘the role
of the European Union in the peace process and future assistance to the Middle East’(1) and its recom-
mendation to the Council on the Union’s Mediterranean policy(2),
Odash having regard to the Barcelona Declaration and work programme of 28 November 1995adopted at
the Barcelona Conference,
Odash having regard to the conclusions of the Malta Conference of 15and 16 April 1997,
Odash having regard to the conclusions of the Palermo Conference of 3 and 4 June 1998,Odash having regard to the conclusions of the Stuttgart Conference of 15and 16 April 1999,
Odash having regard to the conclusions of the civic forums held in Malta, Naples and Stuttgart,
A. having regard to the strategic importance of the Mediterranean for the European Union and the con-
sequent need for a genuine Mediterranean policy capable of sustaining peaceful stability and economicand social development,
B. whereas the Barcelona process has been slow to bear fruit, the reasons for this delay being both
technical (cumbersome administrative procedures and mechanisms for giving effect to the programme)and political (difficulties in the Middle East peace process, the Balkans crisis and crisis in the Europeaninstitutions); whereas the building of a Euro-Mediterranean area cannot be based exclusively on thecreation of a free-trade area,
C. whereas the Third Ministerial Conference in Stuttgart consolidated what had been achieved in Palermo
and defined a practical programme of working methods, emphasising among other things the need fora draft Stability Charter, currently in preparation,
D. noting the successes achieved previously with the signing of five association agreements, but con-
cerned at the long delays in ratifying these agreements on the part of the Member States, whichdelay their entry into force, the difficulties which have arisen in the negotiations concerning theother agreements and the lack of flexibility in the negotiating mandate given to the Commission bythe Council,
E. whereas the bilateral approach based on association agreements may mean that the economies of the
Mediterranean Partners are increasingly shaped by their trade with the European Union, while failing
to develop south-south trade, particularly at the sub-regional level,
F. expressing its surprise that the Commission has so far failed to put forward for discussion any model
multilateral agreement,
G. whereas the association agreements recommend the initiation of a political dialogue based on mutual
understanding and respect and aimed at encouraging democracy, respect for human rights, the rule oflaw and good governance,
H. having regard to the importance of Euro-Mediterranean civil society in achieving the objectives set out
in the Barcelona Declaration; welcoming also the constructive stance adopted by the NGOs forumwhich regularly meets on the fringes of the official interministerial meetings,
I. having regard to the role played by the European Union in the Middle East peace process and the
economic programme running in parallel with it, and stressing the political duty to give the greatest
possible visibility to the European contribution to peace and stability in this neighbouring region,
J. recognising the right of all Mediterranean Partners to take part in the Barcelona process, provided they
undertake to respect the principles on which it is based, the United Nations Charter and the UniversalDeclaration of Human Rights, as well as other obligations deriving from international law, and inparticular from the regional and international instruments to which they are parties,
(1) OJ C 175, 21.6.1999, p. 282.
(2) OJ C 175, 21.6.1999, p. 286.C 378/72 EN 29.12.2000 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 30 March 2000
K. pointing out that the human rights aspects of the Barcelona process are still woefully deficient and
that the situation in many countries shows no sign of improvement,
L. whereas, furthermore, the political changes that have taken place in the Maghreb countries offer con-
ditions which are favourable to the Barcelona process,
M. having regard to the need for the European Union to pay attention to the conflicts in the region and
to state its willingness to support any efforts at mediation,
N. having regard to the low level of investment, particularly private investment, in the Mediterranean
despite the fact that it is generally agreed that the region has great potential,
O. having regard to the need for substantial Community support to accompany the efforts being made by
each of the Mediterranean Partners to achieve economic transition and lessen the social impact of theopening of the markets and to foster regional and sub-regional integration in the Mediterranean,
P. whereas, against this background, revenue from the conversion of the foreign debt should be rein-
vested primarily in joint development policies with the Mediterranean Partners,
Q. whereas in the Euro-Mediterranean region the development of the social and economic area must be
accompanied by a planning policy aimed at balanced, sustainable, integrated spatial development ofthe Euro-Mediterranean territory,
R. firmly convinced that the second Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Forum should be held in the next
few months in order to relaunch and develop the Euro-Mediterranean partnership,
1. Calls on the Council and the Commission to relaunch the Euro-Mediterranean partnership agreed in
Barcelona in November 1995and considers that the lack of progress made is a potential crisis factor in theregion and undermines the EU’s political role in leading the efforts aimed at achieving stability in the area;
2. Calls on the parties to speed up the process of negotiation of the Charter for Stability and Security
and believes that cooperation on security matters cannot be separated from economic and trade develop-ments; urges all parties, in this respect, to pay special attention to conflict prevention policies and non-military means of crisis management;
3. Calls on the Council and Commission to provide appropriations for the European Union’s Mediterra-
nean policy such as will restore the correct balance between funding for the Central and Eastern Europeancountries and that for the Mediterranean Partners, as decided by the Cannes European Council (ratio of 5to 3,5);
4. Calls on the Council and the Commission to return to the all-embracing approach defined in Barce-
lona, taking account of certain hitherto neglected priorities, with a view to economic transition and struc-tural adjustment:
Odash support for investment,
Odash support for decentralised cooperation,Odash support for a policy of joint migration management,Odash support for employment;
5. Calls on the Council and Commission to step up political, economic and financial support for the
integration of the sub-regional zones, starting with the Maghreb and the Middle East, by establishing sub-regional association agreements, providing funding the regional programmes implemented in the frame-work of Euro-Mediterranean partnership at a more significant level than that currently assigned under theMEDA programme;
6. Calls on the Council and Commission to set up, in the framework of the Euro-Mediterranean part-
nership, a programme of interregional and transnational cooperation aimed at achieving complementarityand economic and social integration and carried out via effective financial synergies and coordinationbetween the Interreg and MEDA programmes;29.12.2000 EN C 378/73 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 30 March 2000
7. In this respect calls for annual financial reports to be presented by the Commission to Parliament
which should take into account a clear audit line and the value for money achieved by these programmes;calls furthermore for the formulation of appropriate exit strategies at the end of the programme periods;
8. Reiterates its call to the Council, the Member States and the Commission to act promptly within the
relevant international organisations to establish effective measures to reduce/convert the MediterraneanPartners’ foreign debt;
9. Calls on the Council and Commission to create an attractive environment for investors by providing
technical assistance with harmonising Mediterranean investment law similar to that offered to the Centraland Eastern European countries;
10. Calls on the Council and Commission to ensure that decentralised cooperation is established,
enabling the players in civil society on the two shores of the Mediterranean to meet and design projectstogether, by supporting the new programmes, particularly those within MEDA, and strengthening theMEDA Democracy, Euromed Heritage and Euromed Audiovisual programmes, together with the sub-regio-nal training programmes for journalists;
11. Calls on the Commission to ensure that priority is given in the current year to projects involving
women’s rights and equal opportunities in establishing the MEDA-democracy programme;
12. Calls on all the countries participating in the Euro-Mediterranean partnership to promote the con-
clusion of bilateral and multilateral agreements with a view to guaranteeing Mediterranean migrantsrespect for their political, economic, social and cultural rights;
13. Calls on the Council and the Commission to support initiatives which enable immigrants to parti-
cipate in joint development, i.e. support for micro-projects, training and investment in the country of
origin;
14. Deplores the lack of respect of the human rights clause in the Euro-Mediterranean agreements and
calls on the Commission to assume its responsibility as regards invoking respect of the clause and raisingthe issue of respect for human rights in both multilateral and bilateral talks;
15. Calls on the Council and the Commission to issue an annual report on human rights in the coun-
tries participating in the Barcelona process as a basis for the further development of bilateral relations;
16. Calls on the Council and Member States to adapt visa policy for journalists, artists, sportsmen and
Odash women, businesspeople and students so that the question of visas will not be a stumbling block tohuman exchanges between European and Mediterranean civil societies;
17. Calls on the Commission to support the holding of civil forums which bring together non-govern-
mental organisations and the socio-economic partners with a view to promoting active participation in the
Barcelona process by civil society in the countries concerned;
18. Calls on the Council and the Commission to relaunch the Euro-Mediterranean partnership also by
designing a new generation of programmes with a view to avoiding the current fragmentation and disper-sal, and to ensure better political coordination and more effective use of resources;
19. Calls on the Council and Commission to initiate in the framework of the Euro-Mediterranean part-
nership a joint process of reflection aimed at a coordination of Mediterranean agricultural policies bearingin mind the reform of the CAP and the multifunctional dimension of the agricultural industry; favours theconvening of a Euro-Mediterranean conference on agriculture with participation by representatives of theinstitutions, members of the agri-foodstuffs industry and representatives of farmers’ and consumers’ orga-nisations;
20. Calls on the Commission and Council to promote a regional programme on the Euro-Mediterranean
‘social area’ and to foster increased cooperation in the areas of the environment, tourism, sport and health,inter aliaby an optimisation of cultural heritage, local development and dialogue between cultures and
creeds;C 378/74 EN 29.12.2000 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 30 March 2000
21. Welcomes the decision to hold the second meeting of the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Forum
in Lisbon;
22. Welcomes the decision by the French Presidency to hold a new Euro-Mediterranean Conference on
14 November 2000;
23. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Govern-
ments and Parliaments of the Member States and of the Mediterranean Partners which are signatories tothe Barcelona Declaration.
5. Asylum-seekers and migrants
A5-0057/2000
European Parliament resolution on asylum-seekers and migrants 6dash action plans for countries of
origin or transit. High Level Working Group (C5-0159/1999 6dash C5-0160/1999 6dash C5-0161/1999 6dashC5-0162/1999 6dash C5-0163/1999 6dash C5-0164/1999 6dash C5-0165/1999 6dash C4-0133/1999 6dash 1999/
2096(COS))
The European Parliament,
Odash having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, with particular reference to Arti-
cles 3(1)(d), 13 and 14 and Title IV thereof, and the Treaty on European Union, with particular refer-ence to Articles 2 and 6 and Title VI thereof,
Odash having regard to the terms of reference of the High Level Working Group on Asylum and Migration:
preparation of action plans for the most important countries of origin and transit of asylum-seekers
and migrants (C4-0133/1999),
Odash having regard to the action plans for Sri-Lanka (C5-0160/1999), Somalia (C5-0161/1999), Afghani-
stan (C5-0162/1999), Iraq (C5-0163/1999) and Morocco (C5-0164/1999), and the interim report onAlbania (C5-0165/1999),
Odash having regard to the action plan of the Council and the Commission on how best to implement the
provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam on an area of freedom, security and justice(
1),
Odash having regard to the conclusions of the Tampere European Council of 15and 16 October 1999, with
particular reference to conclusions 2, 3, 4 and 8 and 11 to 27,
Odash having regard to its previous resolutions on immigration and asylum, with particular reference to the
resolutions of 21 September 1995(2) and 13 April 1999(3),
Odash having regard to the report of the Committee on Citizens’ Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home
Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security andDefence Policy and the Committee on Budgets (A5-0057/2000),
A. whereas, despite the fact that the Treaty of Amsterdam has required immigration and asylum policies
to be brought within the Community sphere, the Council has continued to show a marked tendencyto use the intergovernmental procedure under the third pillar for these matters, appearing to reflectthe lack of concern for transparency that has been criticised time and again in the past and whereasthis tendency is also reflected in the Council’s decision to set up a High Level Group not subject todemocratic control,
B. whereas the integrated, cross-pillar approach which the Member States have adopted to the issue of
immigration and asylum, particularly in connection with their relations with countries of origin andtransit is not, in itself, contrary to the Treaties and may produce positive results,
(1) OJ C 19, 23.1.1999, p. 1.
(2) OJ C 269, 16.10.1995, p. 156.
(3) OJ C 219. 30.7.1999, p. 73.29.12.2000 EN C 378/75 Official Journal of the European Communities
Thursday 30 March 2000