ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEE DES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM (81)220
Vol.1981/0080

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement (CEE, Euratom) n°354/83 duConseil du1erfévrier 1983
concernant l'ouverture aupublic des archives historiques delaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergie atomique (JO L43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telque modifié parlerèglement (CE, Euratom) n°1700/2003 du22septembre 2003
(JO L243du27.9.2003, p.1),cedossier estouvert aupublic. Lecaséchéant, lesdocuments
classifiés présents dans cedossier ontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article 5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance with Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No354/83 of 1February 1983
concerning theopening tothepublic ofthehistorical archives oftheEuropean Economic
Community and theEuropean Atomic Energy Community (OJ L43, 15.2.1983, p.1),as
amended byRegulation (EC, Euratom) No1700/2003 of22September 2003 (OJ L243,
27.9.2003, p.1),this fileisopen tothepublic. Where necessary, classified documents inthis
filehave been declassified inconformity with Article 5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung (EWG, Euratom) Nr.354/83 des Rates vom 1.
Februar 1983 über die Freigabe der historischen Archive der Europäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI. L43vom 15.2.1983,
S.1),geändert durch dieVerordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr.1700/2003 vom 22.September 2003
(ABI. L243 vom 27.9.2003, S.1),istdiese Datei derÖffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit
erforderlich, wurden dieVerschlusssachen indieser Datei inÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel 5
dergenannten Verordnung freigegeben.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COM(81)220 final
Brussels ,6th May 1981
A\~ ./N
.1
α:\··λ <τ> Α
<< γ-ΑIΓ"«- Λ.ι V-.1
b~ ; f k S
: v»y ?-Cr.IVr ^ . *---»W\p|_" f fc/
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL
onrelations with non-governmental organizations (NGO's)active
inthe field ofdevelopment ,with special reference tothe co-
financing ofprojects (1980 budget )
COM <81)220 final

Cer^i c-'Lo- 1-
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.Atitsmeeting on28November 1977 theCouncil ofMinisters
(Development )approved theprocedure to "befollowed fortheuse
oftheappropriations forthe cofinancing ofprojects with '•
îTGOs .
That procedure includes astipulation that the Commission will
present anannual report tothe Council onthe use ofthe credits
allocated during thepreceding year .
Inaccordance with that procedure the Commission presents this
Report ,which deals with the usemade ofthe Budget of14MEUA
2entered under Article 945 ofthe 1980 Community Budget .
2.Although relations with the WGOs aremainly inthe field ofproject
cofinancing indeveloping countries ,other important areas for co­
operation with theNGOs arealso covered ,such asFood andEmergency
Aid ,Development Education intheCommunity and coordination among
.WGOs . , ' '*
SeeCouncil Document R/207/78(GCD )of26January -1978 .
2Increased to14,352,974 EUA when one adds theunused balance
from Article 945carried ever froit 1^79 .

CONTENTS
I.INTRODUCTION
II.RETROSPECTIVE 1976-1980
III .COFINANCING 0?NGO PROJECTS INDEVELOPING COUNTRIES .
.1.1980 operations' - • '
2.Management ofcofinancing operations from previous years
3.Evaluation and revision ofgeneral conditions
IV.COFINANCING 0?DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION PROJECTS IN1980
V. OTT-TET ?NGO ACTIVITIES
VI.PERSPECTIVES FOR 1981
VII .COORDINATION AMONG NGOs
VIII .CONCLUSIONS
TABLES
TABLE I »Breakdown byMember State ofNGOprojects cofinanced
inI98O . 1
TABLE IIA :List ofNGOprojects cofinanced inI98O
TABLE IIB :List ofBlock-Grant allocations inI98O
TABLE III :Breakdown ofprojects cofinanced inI98O
A.bybeneficiary country and B.bycontinent
TABLE IV :Classification ofprojects cofinanced inI98O
TABLE V :List ofNGODevelopment Education Projects cofinanced
inI98O
TABLE VI sSummary ofNGOcofinancing operations from 1976 to
I98O inclusive
A-OVerall ~
B-Bycontinent
C-Bynon-ACP Beneficiary State
D-ByACPBeneficiary State
E-ByMember State •

-5-
REPORT ONRELATIONS WITH NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
(HGOs )ACTIVE INTHEFIELD OFDEVELOPMENT ,WITH SPECIAL
REFERENCE TOTHECOFINANCING OFPROJECTS (198O BUDGET )
I.INTRODUCTION . .
Since 197° ,theEuropean Community hasoffered toEuropean _
Non-Governtoerital Organizations help andassistance with the
financing oftheir micro-projects indeveloping countries andmore recently
with their public education work inEurope onThird World issues . • ■
Such cooperation isamply justified "bythe efficient and flexible
way inwhich NCOs support the development ofthe most needy in-
developing countries and inthe expression thus given tothe
(solidarity ofthe'"unofficial "Europe with poverty andinjustice
experienced bythose indeprived situations . >
I98O marked ,therefore ,thefifth consecutive operational year of
Community /NGOcooperation and ,assuch ,wastobecome ayear for
retrospection and evaluation asmuch asfor action .
Itisthus appropriate that thefirst part ofthis report
bedevoted togeneral comments onthe experiences ofthis period .
More complete information onprevious years' activities maybeobtained
byreferring totherelevant annual reports ^".
II.RETROSPECTIVE 1976-1980
<
When governmental andnon-governmental organizations decide towork
together ,essential elements forpositive cooperation are mutual
comprehension andtrust with each side recognising •theother 'sview­
point andavoiding the unilateral imposition ofconditions.' The
acceptance ofthis fundamental point byboth the Commission and the
1976 Reference »G0M(77 )83final
1977 " COM(78)75 final
1978 " C0M(79)112 final
1979 " 'COM (80)98 final

NGOs has oeen the Key tothesuccess ofthe cofinancing
scheme .Prom the beginning adialogue took place onall matters of
mutual interest ,with the Commission recognising the collective
plurality and individual autonomy oftheNGOs while they accepted its
public responsibility .
1.Cofir.ar.cin ;*cfprojects indeveloping countries
Itisobviously inthe NGO response tothe funds allocated for micro -
projects indeveloping countries that the best evidence ofthis positive
spirit ofcooperation can befound .Each year requests have greatly sur­
passed available funds ,thus ensuring not only the commitment infull
ofeach year 'sbudget allocation but also aconsiderable carry over of
projects tosuccessive years .For example ,in1976 only 76out ofthe
121 projects submitted could eventually becofinanced from the then
budget of2.5KEUA ;in1978 thegreatly augmented budget of12KEUA ,
would only permit 176 out ofover 200projects tobecofinanced ,
culminating inthesituation inI98O when only 181projects from a
total of367could besupported (leaving acarry over of119projects
foratotal request of10,8 KEUA ),Inaparallel manner ,theaverage
Community contribution has increased greatly from 31,000 EUA per
project in197o to81,000 EUA inI98O (leaving aside contributions to
Block grants ),which isareflection both ofNGO willingness tounder­
take larger projects than before and also unfortunately ,inflation ,in
particular inthe developing world .
Thus bytheendofthis first five year period ,atotal of693projects
had been cofinanced with 124 NC-Os ,absorbing aCommunity contribution
of43,5 KEUA towards anoverall joint investment ofover 125MEUA
(showing amultiplier effect of288$ ).This last high figure effectively
demonstrates NGO ability toattract private and public donations and
indeed must beseen asaconsiderable vote ofconfidence bythe man of
the street intheir work and integrity .
The financial interest toNGOs ofaccess topublic funds isevident but ,
atthe same time ,they had toaccept responsibility for the control and
accountability ofthe funds granted tothem .Finding a"modus vivendi "
which respected their independence and yet satisfied theneeds of
public accountability was amost important task during the first years .

-7-
Ingeneral terms theCommission isvery satisfied with theworking of *
this programme .Agreat number ofpoor communities has •been assisted
and themultiplier effect ofthework isenormous .The UGOs have proven
theadvantages oftheir flexibility andefficiency at"grass roots "
level and the speed atwhich they can react toeconomic orpolitical
changes and adapt their working methods tosuit . . ■
2The NGOs
The large number ofNGOs ,124 attheendof1980 ,whohave participated
incofinancing operations confirms the openness ofthe scheme .Ofthese
\many areregular partners returning each year with newprojects but at
the same time newcontacts arecontinuously established .Overall the
Commission appreciates thecooperation ithasreceived from all the
NGOs and for theunderstanding they have shown for the inevitable
procedures and administrative requisites .Itwould emphasise that it •
seeks inits partners not just agenuine commitment todevelopment
assistance but equally a"bona-fide "European identity .
» .
Each JTGO has anindividual style ofworking ,some have organised them­
selves with afull structure offield representatives andcoordinators while
others relate directly tolocal communities and organisations .These
communities are often thevoiceless and most helpless ones ,those least
likely tobeable tocommunicate their needs and achieve anofficial
response .Inthese cases ,the ITGOrole isasa"catalyst forchange to
aidpeople tofree themselves from astate ofpoverty andoppression "
This hasbeen recognised bythegovernments ofmany developing countries
whohave entrusted' toNGOs implementation ofmany small scale projects .
Indeed thecomplementarity of"official "and "unofficial "aidprogrammes
isvery evident and isoneofthe justifications for continued assistance
toNGOs .
3The Projects .
Over thepast 5years theCommission hasassisted avast range ofdiverse
operations .Acursory analysis shows anemphasis onintegrated rural
development (31^)and .Education andTraining (31$),withHealth (17^)
following .Butwithin these arbitrary classifications lies avast range
ofapproaches andphilosophies .

-a- ,
Priority isgiven to .those projects which aidtheauto-development of
poor rural communities inthe least developed countries and stress is
placed upon the full participation bythelocal community inallstages
ofthe project from conception toeventual management .
4Beneficiary countries
à
TheCommission ishappy tonote that 68$ofthefunds forcofinancing
were used forprojects incountries having aper capita GNP ofless than
$500 .Inprinciple ,projects can "becofinanced inall developing countries
whether' associated tothe Community ornot .Inpractice ,projects sub­
mitted bythe ITGOs andapproved bythe Commission have resulted inan
almost even balance between AC?and non ACP countries .
Itshould beremembered that itisthe ITGOs who take the initiative
inpresenting projects totheCommission andthe list ofbeneficiary
countries very much reflects traditional andhistorical links between
Europe and theThird World .This means ineffect that Africa benefited
greatly from thescheme with 52$oftotal funds allocated ,followed by
Asia with 25$andLatin America with 23$ .
Theprincipal beneficiary country wasIndia with 68projects involving
aCommunity contribution of3,94 METJA ,Senegal andUpper Volta follow
with 2,29 MEUA and 1.92 METJA respectively .
5Development Education
Prom the outset ofCommunity cooperation with ITGOs ,the latter have
stressed the importance of'their role asopinion formers inEurope
\
onThird World issues .The Commission recognises this role andbelieves
that public opinion must bemade aware ofthe interdependence of 'our
economies with those ofdeveloping countries .
Λ
Asaconsequence theCommission assisted the ITGOs in1978 with two Development
Education projects atEuropean level ;these were anexhibition ofeduca­
tional materials assembled byITGOs from all theMember States and a
conference onissues related totherenegotiation ofthe Lome Convention .
In1979 >17projects were ,cofinanced mostly onthethemes ofIndustrial
andAgricultural cooperation between Europe andtheThird World .Afurther
14projects were assisted in198O .

experience inthis field ofwork demonstrates the need togooutside the
habitual grouping ofdevelopment NGOs tothe specific interest groups .
Tothis effect ,-contact has -been established with the Trade Union Movemanl
Farming Organisations ,Youth Groups ,the Consumer Associations and
Womens 'Organisations .This isanecessary step aseducation /information
programmes ,initiated and developed byorganisations for the benefit of
their ownmembers ,have arcuch greater credibility andtherefore chance
ofsuccess .Itisencouraging tonote that .there isagrowing awareness ,
among groups not normally associated with development issues ,ofthe need
toinclude aThird World dimension intheir work .
\
6Coordination amonp:the ÎTGOs
Todate ,over 300 European NGOs have contacted the Commission inthe.'
context ofthe cofinancing programme .This large number ofpotential
partners hasmeant that,' although theCommission maintains aone to
onerelationship with each NGOfor^ll matters todowith their projects ,
ithas facilitated their coming together attheEuropean level to
investigate thepossibilities ofworking together .Each year therefore ,
aGeneral Assembly ofNGO representatives has been held inBrussels ,
theobject being both toallow forCommission /NGOdialogue andto
establish aforum for contact between NGOs from the different Member
States .These Assemblies have inturn elected aLiaison -Committee which
meets regularly with the Commission 'sservices ,and therefore provides
apermanent contact point for consultation onall NGO affairs .
' -V
In1980 ,thewhole character ofthese twobodies changed fundamentally .
For the first time national assemblies ofNGOs were organised bythe
NGOs ineach Member State anddelegates were democratically elected both
tothe General Assembly inBrussels and tothe Liaison Committee .This
obviously increased theauthority and status ofthese bodies andenhanced
their interest and attraction toall NGOs .
Itisinteresting tonote ,andtheCommunity may feel proud' ofthefact ,
that ithas played acatalytic role inbringing together NC-Os asmuch
onthe national asontheEuropean levels .This ,inturn ,isleading
togreater cooperation and liaison which can only betothe benefit of
their partners indeveloping countries and topublic awareness inEurope
onThird World issues . -

-10-
7Learning process ■ '
These first 5years canberegarded as'alearning process asmuch for
the NGOs asfor the Community .Acontinued ,programme ofdiscussion on
experience acquired ledtotheproposal that ajoint CEC/NGOpilot
comparative evaluation beundertaken oftheEDF^"andNGOmicro-project
systems .Theresults ofthis preliminary analysis will beimportant and
must lead toanimproved understanding ofthe impact ofprojects and
ofpossible improvements inoperation andapproach .
III COFINANCING OFNGO PROJECTS IK "DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1.19&0 operations
Global statistics .
I98O began with theCommunity budget notyetadopted bytheEuropean
Parliament .This meant that the Commission ,inorder tocontinue'
operations ,had until the final budget was adopted inJuly toresort
toa"provisional twelfths "procedure based onthe 1979 budget .A
brake was thus put onwork atatime when aconstantly increasing
number ofapplications wasbeing made .Inall367projects were sub­
mitted (52^more than last year )representing atotal request for
33.7 MEUA (22,6% ofthebudget ).181ofthese projects were cofinanced
bytheCommission from the14MEUA available forthis purpose ,with
69NGOs (ofwhich 23forthefirst time )benefiting .This includes a
total of689,781 EUAwhich wasma.de available to17NGOs asblock grants .
Afurther 119projects foratotal request of10.8 MEUA were carried
over to1981 ,duetothelack offunds .Theremaining 67projects for
9MEUA were either subsequently withdrawn bytheNGOs orcould not
beaccepted for cofinancing .
Payments -forprojects approved inI98O amounted to4*6MEUA .The out­
standing balance (9«4MEUA )will bepaid over thecoming years .
Total payments inI98O including those inrespec /tofcommitments made in
previous years ,amounted to10.3 MEUA .
Adetailed analysis ofthe projects cofinanced can befound inthe
tables .I-IV annexed tothis report .
1)European Development Fund

Theaverage Community contribution perproject excepting block grants was
81.000 E'JA in1980 .Itisworth noting that although 'acontribution ofup
to300.000 EUAispossible foraproject ,inonly 7»4^ofcases didthe
Community contribute more than 200.000 EUAandthat iri35•&$<>ofcases the
contribution 'was less than 50.000 EUA . " • '
17 -block grants were made to17NGOs (5more than in1979 )towards
micro-projects involving aCommunity contribution ofless than 10.000 EUA
22NCOs were eligible toapply forthis scheme asagainst 16in1979 .
Thetotal Community contribution was 689 .781EUAandtheaverage
contribution was40.$75EUAperNG0 . •' ,
Thevariety ofprojects cofinanced inI98O demonstrated once again
that >TC0s are capable ofresponding inavery positive way tothe needs
oflocal communities inthe developing countries and ofadapting ;to
their initiatives .Types ofproject ranged from the supply ofequip­
ment toprogrammes ofintegrated rural development ,covering production ,
training ,social infrastructure .
Rural development ,education andtraining head the list ofprojects
supported butother important areas ofwork include social welfare and
health . ; ■ v
Like last year ,solar ,aeoliah andbiogas sources ofenergy were
used with sUcess inagood number ofprojects .Alternative sources
ofenergy offer great potential' todeveloping countries where conditions -are
particularly suitable ,eglong periods ofsunshine ,strong winds ,and 'will .
assist ,.sh'eir development process inboth themedium andlong terms' byleadin
toahigher degree 'ofenergy auto-sufficiency . .
;'3en_af ipiarycountries -andcommunities ' :J - "'
•,-66 :,countrien' ofwhich' 6'for .••••the' .-first ,"time 'benefited ...".from cofinacing
operations ift -1980 ^108projects will becarried outin35ACPstates
for a'total ".ofoKEUA while 8MEUA will gtowards 12$projects tobe ;
ca?ried voutin31 -iion-ACP states . 'Itcanbenoted that 52$offunds •v
"aliooai.ei vent toAfrica ,.27$toCentral andLatin America -Vand 16^to ■-"•
:jinco .:5.0mcNGOs introduced projects covering several countries ,these
<i.-.uret ,-dor.otcorrespond tothenumber ,ofprojects cofinanced .

-12-
Agreat number ofrequests was submitted ,forprojects inZimbabwe .
Ofthese theCommission cofinanced 17foratotal ofnearly 1.4M2UA
These projects dealt ,inparticular with theresettlement ofthemany -
thousands whohadfled thecountry ,andassistance tothenewgovernment
inthedevelopment ofanintegrated economy forthebenefit ofthe
whole population . .
The' multiplier effect ofCommunity contributions
TheCommunity contribution cannot inprinciple exceed 50foofthetotal
costs ofaproject except induly justified cases where itmayrise
to75$ .This occured inonly 32of .the164projects cofinanced .On
theother hand in68other projects theCommunity contribution was
less than 50$ *
The multiplier effect ofCommunity funds isimportant since the total
investment -inI98O through NGOs came tonearly 37MEUA ofwhich the
Community part represented 38$ .
Role ofthea\rthorities_in _thebeneficiary_c£untries_
Asinprevious years ,the Commission will send this report forinformatio
totheMissions ofbeneficiary countries inBrussels and tothe ACP
secretariat . _
The interest taken bydeveloping country governments inITGOactivities
continues togrow *-andisindeed confirmed bytheincreasing support they
give totheprojects .
Implementation andcontrol ofprojects cofinanced inI98O
Since thepayment ofthe Community contribution forprojects can be
spread over several years ,the implementation and control will also be
spread out .Inprinciple STGOs must submit aninterim report 9months
after the payment ofthe first and ofthe second tranche and an
implementation report' 9months after the last payment .The first
reports forI98O projects should therefore arrive inthebeginning of
19Sl .Control procedures onthese reports will then becarried out .

-.13-
2.Management ofcofinancing opera tions from previous years
.Themanagement (including control )ofprojects cofinanced in1979 ("152 ■projects ,
■12block grant 's)in1978 (172projects ),in1977 (113projects )and ■i'
in1976 (75projects )continued normally in1980.
».
3.Evaluation and Revision ofthe General Conditions .
Evaluation ■ • ... •
Thefinal report ofthe joint Commission /NGOcomparative -evaluation ,,<?£
NCOandEDPmicro projects infour West African countries and (forNGO
projects only )Bangladesh isexpected to "bepublished inthenear future ..
Given thegeographio limitations the report cannot beanything other than
"apreliminary review oftheNGOprojects .Itdoes ,however ,highlight a
number ofpoints towhich the Commission and theNGOs will begiving close
attention . ....
While noting that ,without exception ,the .NGOprojects were implemented •
' . . .Λ
asplanned ,itdraws attention ,inanumber ofcases ,totheunderachieves ent
'ofthe full NGOpotential forassisting local groups toimprove their self ,
development capacity .TheVei>ort also notes theneed foragreater coherence .
andcoordination among NGOs ,particularly where different NGOs aresupporting
similar projects inthe same region.,' '. ' ..
•General Conditions ofCofinancing 1
TheGeneral .Conditions ofproject cofinancing which setdown the guidelines
tobefollowed in .this matter are based onthe "Procedure for the use ofthe
appropriation for cofinancing with the NGOs "finalised inNovember 1977 *
TheCommission feels that itisonly normal after thefirst five years of ~
cofinancing that the "General Conditions "should bereviewed toseewhether
ornot .they need tobeamended totake account ofdevelopments since 1976 .
Itshould bestated that thebasic elements ofthe scheme -financial
participation bytheNGOs ,andtheautonomy oftheNGOs -will not "be
changed butthat theexamination will centre ontheprocedures involved
toensure that thebest value int'erms ofefficiency andviability isachieved .

14-
undertaking .this review the Commission ,isezcamir.ing anumber ofinputs
including "thereport oft-he evaluation described inthe previous paragraph .
Itisai:.,o drawing onthe experience ofits own servioea and onoomr.cnts
xc.ce bythe relevant officials inMember State administrations during the
regular consultations which take place with Commission services ,and of
representation made "bythe ITGOs either collectively through the ITGO Liaison
Committee orindividually . _
IV CC?TK.A *TCr?:0 07DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION PROJECTS 1171980
The budget allocation forthis purpose stayed ,atthe same ,level inI98O
asin1979 >notwithstanding the substantial increase infunds requested
bythe Commission .This meant that only 14 -'projects for atotal value
of253,914 EUAs could becofinanced .The Commission reaffirms its
commitment tosupporting NGO activities inDevelopment Education and
recognises that this will continue tabeagrowth area initsrelations
with !\TGOs inthe coming years .
Alist ofthe .projects cofinanced .inI9B0 is'annexed asTable V. ,Prom this
itcan beseen that asinprevious' years aprincipal theme was relations
between Europe and the Third World with emphasis onthe Lome Convention
and aspects ofindustrial and agricultural cooperation .Alarge number of
valid requests could not besatisfied due tothe shortage offunds and
have therefore been carried over toI98I .Indeed itshould benoted that
asmany projects again aswere cofinanced in1980iiave been carried over
toI98I .
ν,
The Commission isencouraged by -the current debate organised bythe 5TG0
Liaison Committee onfuture directions for development education .It
has become very obvious that increased cooperation andpooling ofresources
among NGOs isnecessary toavoid duplication andwaste .The establishment
ofEuropean networks' ofgroups working onsimilar subjects orwith the
same target groups isanatural consequence -The Commission -isalso pleased
tonote agrowing tendency among themore active ITGOs torelate more at
grass-root level inour communities .

-15-
Y0TH3T ??~10 ACTIVITIES
Emergency Aid " "
33agreement swere made with .TTGOs in1930 foremergency aidoperations .
These were carried out asmuch innon-associated countries asinthose
linked through the Lome Convention .The total amount involved vas in
the region of J-0'MEUA .
This aidwas used ,inageneral rule ,for the supply ofmedecines ,
food ,clothes ,shelter ,,andconstruction materials to'populations
affected "bydisasters for example ,inCambodia orafter the earthquake
atElAsnam .
Food Aid ,
Under the terms oftheCommunity 's1930 food aidprogrammes ,theNGOs
were granted 25,000 tonnes ofskimmed-milk powder and 1,000 tonnes of
butteroil .This aidwas shipped todifferent developing countries
through .Europe-based NGOs ,mostly affiliated toChristian churches . .
Furthermore ,some European NGOs were actively involved intheemergency
food aid oftheEuropean Community tothe "benefit ofAfrican countries
affected bydrought andfordisplaced people (Djibouti ,"Ethiopia ,.Kenya
Somalia ,Sudan andUganda ).Inthis respect thefollowing quantities
were channelled through NGOsi 1,000 tonnes ofsugar ,1,250 tonnes of
butteroil and 5>450 .tonnes ofskimmed-milk powder .

VIPERSPECTIVES FOR 1961 . ■ j
°£future budget requirements - f
. ' !
A;;,t:-e1980appropriation forNGOsproved tobeinadequate toservice the !
1
~reut number ofprojects submitted ,aplea must beentered formore re- I
!
sources forthefuture .Thelack offunds meant that many projects have '
(
naatobedelayed orpostponed thus directly affecting thepotential bene -*
ficiarioii andendangering theeventual success oftheproject . i
•; : I
•■ i
Asubstantial increase infunds forthese purposes should therefore be }
provided infuture budgets . -,
ï
-. ■ . • I
t
• " ' ' !
.Communities t (
1 ' \
■ 'A:v°fJanuary I98I ,Greek .HGOs maysubmit projects forconsideration undeii
thecofinancing scheme .TheCommission hastaken thenecessary steps to 1
inform theGreek authorities ofthis andlooks forward towelcoming the
first contact .
3.International Year ofthe_Eandicapped . , |
/
I
[
TheCommission will payparticular attention toprojects submitted j
during thecourse ofI98I which help toimprove the situation of • '
handicapped people inthedeveloping countries .Indeed sixsuch j
!
projects have already been cofinanced inI98O foratotal contribu - |
.tion of470 j893EUAs# j
i\ j
4.1981-1990 International Drinking Water Sugplg andSanitation Decade {
Many projects inthis field have already been assisted inprevious
years .TheCommission will continue toexamine attentively all
requests which deal with ensuring better access for communities in
developing countries toclean water and amore hygienic environment .
5.TJJrConference ontheLeast Develoged_Countries ,_September 1981
Itisexpected that JTGOs will take akeen interest inthis conference j
andthat some measure ofcoordination will "take place toensure that j
their viewpoint isheard .TheCommission will follow this through it's
discussions with the Liaison Committee .

-17-
vu COORDINATION :AMO?:O MOOS
The Sixth Annual NGO Assembly took place inMaroh I98O and was
^attended bydelegations and observers drawn from all the Member
States .Discussion centred onthe main aspects ofComnunity /lTGO
cooperation and o,nperspectives for the future .Areport ofthe
meeting .was circulated within -the Community institutions and to
all interested NGOs . *
1
The Liaison Committee was also elected during this Assembly .
This Committee met 6times inI98O andits specialist ad-hoc groups
for Development Education ,Food and Emergency Aid ,and General
Conditions have also held meetings . ' .. "
Itshould benoted that during the year the Liaison Committee was
granted the status ofaninternational non-profit making organisation
under Belgian law.
InJune 1980 >theLiaison Committee had ahearing with the Develop­
ment Committee ofthe European Parliament .Awide-ranging discussion
took place onallaspects ofCommunity /lTGOrelations .Both sides
expressed themselves satisfied with the outcome ofthe meeting and
itwas agreed tocontinue the dialogue infuture years .
NG0 representatives also participated inthe debate on "Hunger in
the World "organised bythe European Parliament .
VIII CONCLUSIONS ''. ' ,
Community cooperation with NGOs isnow ,after five years inoperation ,a
firmly established part ofitsoverall development policy .
Many worthwhile projects have been assisted forthebenefit ofthe poorest
populations indeveloping countries ,thus expressing thesolidarity ofthe
i.
people ofEurope with those inthe Third World .
/' ' " ^. .
The Commission therefore looks forward with confidence tocontinued cooperation
with the NGOs .Itissatisfied with the operational contacts ithas had with
individual NGOs andnotes with keen interest the efforts they "are making to
unite more onthe European level ,through ..their General Assembly and
Liaison Committee .

-19~
TABLE I
BREAKDOWN BYMEMBER STATE OFNGO PROJECTS COFINANC2D IN19oO
PROJECTS APPROVED
NUMBER
OF NGOsNUMBER
OF PROJECTSOF
BLOCKWHICH -
GRANTSCOMMUNITY GRANTS
IN EUA
BELCIUÏÎ 16 35 3 . 2.69O.4IO
DENMARK 3 3- - 210.493
FEDERAL REFUBLIC
OF CERMANY8 24 1 ,2.314.970 "
FRANCE s16 34 4 2.5O7.I53
IRELAND ■. 3 21
-\3 · 56I.73I
ITALY ■ 7 14 - I.505.429
LUXEMBOURG ,1 ■ 1'
- IOI.5O8
NETHERLANDS :3, ;x4 3 I.505.429
UNITED KINGDOM ■12 ;34. 3 2.498.479 "
DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 13 . :14
. ·\"· 253.914 '
82 195 ■ 17 14.243.332 ,
LIAISON COMMITTEE .<■' - – – – '65.201
TO BE CARRIED FORWARD
TOTHE I98I FINANCIAL
YEAR (l)'/
- ■-(·44.44I .
TOTAL*
14352^.974
(l)This isaseparate appropriation which iscarried ,forward tothefollowing
Financial Year .

TABLE II
LIST 0?NCO PROJECTS COFINANCED ITf1930
–
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUACommission grant
inSUAandas%.ι
oftotal cost
ONG/3/80/B
BROEDERLIJK DELENι
Construction oftwo dams inthe
Bandiágara region .
MALI. ·"V24.028 12.014
50£
OÏ.'C/5/30/IT
ASSOCIAZIONE ITA­
LIANA SOCI COS-
TRUTTORI IBO
(C.I.D.Α.Ξ.C.Α.)Setting upáhdequipping ofa
cooperative ,fitting out ofa
dispensary ,improving the status
ofwomen ,with aview tocommu -
nity development andraising the
level ofsocio-economic develop -
ment inAngochagua .
ECUADOR203.033 87.304
43£
ON'C/Í/SO/F
TER&3 D33HOMMES -
FRANCSMultidisciplinary "Nomadep "pro­
ject intheAwash region ,
Kassem-Kabana area :stock-farm -
ing ,equipment ,construction of
adispensary and purchase of
means oftransport .
ETHIOPIA226.271 95.034
42% .
ONc/9/So/3
0XFAM-33LGIQU2Improvements toaclinic for
handicapped refugees inft>rt
Sudan .
SUDAN238.800y *
119.400 ·
50%
ON'O/9/So/lT
MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO
EPACE
(M.S.P. )Supply ofpotable water forthe
3ank-3afang hospital ,department
ofHaut-Nkam .
CAMEROON126.446 , 63.223
50%
0NG/12/30/F
CENTRE D*ECHANGES
ETPROMOTION DES
ARTISANS ENZONES
.AEQUIPER .
(C.E.P.A.Ζ.E.)Setting upofshea butter work -
shops inDaban .
MALI125.160 62.580
50%
ONG/13/80/B
SOS FAIMConstruction ofsubsidized
bousing intheBroocklyn shanty -
towns atPort-au-Prince.
HAITI315.874 97.921
31%

-22-
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUACommission grant
inSUA andis %
oftotal cost
O:JC/I4/SO/D
ADVENT -WOHLFAiiRTS -
WERXConstruction ofstorage facili -
ties and purchase ofagenerator
for ahospital inMokolo .
CAMEROON40.908
V»-20.454
50%
o:;C/I3/3O/D
AD'.'Ξ:ΓΓ -WOH LFAHHT3 -
W2HKElectrification ofthe Andapa
hospital .
MADAGASCAR4O.788 20.394
50%
o::c/iS/3C/D
LAΤΞI.V AMER IKA,.
ZrJTÍTRÜMSquip-ent for asewing coopera -
tive atSao Vicente ,Minas
Garais state .
3RA2IL20.013 12.80 8
64%
OÎ;3/I3/SO/? *
ASSOCIATICI FRAN­
ÇAISE DES VOIÆ.V -
TAIRES DU PROCRES
(A.F.V . ?.)Integrated development of 17
villages inthe Belabo region .
Setting upofawarehouse and
woodworking shops inBelabo .,
CA.YEROON399.27 6 135.754
34%
Ofíu/19/30/3*
CSÍTR3 D'AIDS AU
DEVELOPPEES ?DA5S
LA LIBERTE ET LS
PROGRES
(DELI PRO)Construction and equipping ofa
literacy centre inTansobtinga .
UPPER VOLTA167.332 83.606
50%
0NrG/20/S0/?»
ASSOCIATION FIAN­
CAISS DES '/OLOM-
TAIRES DU PROGRIS
(A.F.V .P. ) .Installation ofyoung pioneers
onland tobecolonized inCalim .
CA:EHOOÎÎ241.843 67.716
s
28%
0\TG/2I/80/R*
CENTRE INTERNATIO­
NAL LS ROCHETONDevelopment education training
programme inrural areas combin­
ing 3projects inPeycouhk ,
Lehar and Bamba .
SENEGAL74.2451
36.380
49%
ONC/22/SO/?*
OPERATION 2000•Equipping ofwater pomû3 ana .mo­
tivation inthe rural communities
ofGandiaye ,5ya and Ndiebel .
c·–» t»67.464 33.732
50%
*Pre ^e"13~^.rrieo over froTi 1^7^toa^O

Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUA -Commission grant
inEUA and as %
oftotal cost
ONC/23/CO/F*
AI.IMENTATION ΞΤ
DEVELOPPEMENT DS
L'ΚίΙ-Ά'ΓΓ
(Α.D.Ξ.)Setting· upand equipping ofa
dispensary and anutrition
centre andtraining ofalocal
team intheJongley region .
SUDAN .285.489 102.776
36%
OuC,/?/./ ôo/y«
COMITE CATHOLIQUE
CONTRE LAFAIM ET
POUR LE3Γ/ΞLOPPS -
Í'EÍJT
(C.C.P.D. )Construction and equipping ofa
brick-works inRosso .
(Seeproject ONC/7I/78/?)
MAURITANIA "*228.965 98.455
43%
0:íC/25/SO/?»
COMITÉ CATHOLIQUE
CONTRE LA FAIM ET
POUR LE DEVELOPPE­
»frn rrr>,À
(C.C.F.D. )Small-scale water engineering
for animals inthe Oudalan subì -
prefecture (Gorom-Gorom ).
Construction ofseveral wells
and ponds . . ..
UPPER VOLTA\
217.549 84.844
49%
OÏ'G/27/30/?*
unions DES AMIS ET
COMPAGNONS
D'DSIA'JSInte.7r3.ted rural development of
the Aley district inthe south
east ofBeirut .
LEBANONI75.52O , 100.046
■57 JÉ
OÎ.O/23/SO/3*
ΤΚΞ INSTITUTE 0Γ
CULTURAL AFFAIRS
(I.C. Α.)Hirnan and' socio-economic develop -
ment inthevillage ofKapini ,
•Central Province .
ZAMBIAI38.902 58.339
42%
OTO/29/30/D*
DEUTSCHE WELTHUN -
GERHILFE
(D.W. H.H. )Setting upofacentre for educ-
ation and agricultural and'
artisanal rehabilitation in
Gatangi ,Machakos district .'
KENYA ■ ''135.634
>67.817
50£
0NG/30/30/B
COMIDEFitting out ofatraining centre
for the human ,economic and
social advancement ofhomeless
adolescents inBelo Horizonte .
BRAZIL
J41.840 20.920
50£ ,
Projects carried over from 1979 to1980

-24
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
.EUACommission grant
inEUA and as %
oftotal cost
OÍ.'G/32/30/D*
AXTION PATENSCHAFTConstruction ofanagricultural
school inFiladefia tothe north
ofAsunqion .
PARAGUAY463.869 120.606
26 %
oNc/33/oo/D»
ZENTRALSTELLE FÜR
ENTWICKLUNGSHILFEEquipping ofworkshops iha
technical school inCampo Gallo ,
Santiago del Estero state .
ARGENTINA295.I3O 59.02 6
20%
o.,:c/3'S/8o/?*
UN'IO "DES AMIS ET
CO*·' ΡΛG
D'HC-'AÜS
IConstruction ofavocational
school inthe north-eastern .
area ofBeirut .
LEBANON196.820 98.410
50%
ONG/37/SO/F*
CENTRE INTERNATIO - .
NAL DE DEVELOPPE­
MENT ET DE RECHZR -
OHE
(C.I.D.R. )Agricultural and cooperative
development programme inthe
Say arrondissement ,canton of
Torodi .
NIGER166.284 83.142
> ;50i
«ν
DNG/23/SO/F*
ASSOCIATION FRAN­
ÇAISE DES VOLON­
TAIRES DU HîOCRES
(A.P.V .P.)Construction and equipping of
anartisanal centre inDamien ,
inthe outskirts ofPort-au -
Prince . -
Creation ofworkshops inthe
Saint-Raphaël region .
HAITI -194.778 - ■97.389
50%
ONG/4O/8O/?*
TERRE DES HOJGÍES -
FRANCEConstruction ofdwellings ,a
kindergarten and water supply
for the Kebelles inAddis Ababa
and Debre Zeit .φ
ETHIOPIA .38.353 18.793
49%
ONG/4l/So/S
CO.'ÍIDETechnical equipment for sections
ofthe Cité des Jeunes in
Lubu.nbashi .
ZAIRE243.320 97-328
40%
ONG/43/30/B*
COOPIBOInstallation ofasaw mill in
the "cercle "ofKasumba ,pro­
vince ofKasaï .
ZAIRE ',192.747 94.44 6\
49
*Projects carried over ,frcn 1979 to19c0

Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUACommission grant
inEUAand .is%
oftotal cost
ONG/44/80/B*
CENTRE D'AIDS AU
DEVELO ΡΡΞ-lSiT DAMS
LALIBERTE ETLE
PROGRES
(DELIPRO)Purchase ofequipment and set­
tingupofamobile aedical
station inthe south ofthe
country ,,
SOMALIA
( .133.619 64.137
48%
3NG/45/8O/B«
3R0EDERLIJK DELEM
\Integrated rural development in
thedistrict ofMusoaa (Mara
region ).
Construction ofcattle sheds ,
irrigation andtraining of
farmers .
TANZANIA '198.624 97.32 6
49%
\
':N'G/4Ó/3O/3*
DXFAM -BELGIQUESetting upofmobile medical
units inthenorth west regions .
NICARAGUA . ,I98.67O 99.335
50%
3NG/47/Ò0/L *
BRIDD2RLICH DELEN .
rCons tract ionana equipping ofan
agricultural andstock breeding
training centre atNarunyu .
TANZANIA298.553 _ IOI.50 8
34%
OÎ:G/4?/8O/D
ZENTRALSTELLE FÜR
EMTWICKLUNGSHI LTEEquipment foratechnical school
inSan Fernando .
PHILIPPINES614.541 .301.125
"49%
ONG/50/ñO/D
ZENTRALSTELLE FÜR
ENTWICKLUNGSHILFEEquipping andreorganizing of
theworkshops ofatechnical
school inAlexandria .
EGYPT387.160 'I93.58O
50%
ONG/51/SO/F
ASSOCIATION JEUNES -
SSD'ACTION POUR
LACOOPERATION Sc.
LASOLIDARITE
(A.J.A.C. S.)Construction ofadam inTougsie -
ten<ra ,sub-prefecture ofKoupela .
UPPER VOLTA 70.514 52.180
.74%
■ONC/53/SO/IT»
MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO
EPACE
(U.S.?.)Soil and water conservation and
motivation ofrural population .
inthe Santa Cruz river basin anc
adjacent valleys .
Santiago Island .
(Seeprojects ONG/91/76/IT,
O:TG/Ì77/7"/)/IT,0NG/54/20/IT)
CAPE VERDE378.037 283.528
75%
*Projects carried over from 1979 toI$o0

-26-
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUACommission grant
inEUA andis %
oftotal cost
0NG/;4/80/IT*
MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO
EPACE
(M.S.P.)Soil and water conservation ,and
motivation ofthe rural popul­
ation inthe Ribeira river basin
and adjacent valleys .
Santiago Island .
(Seeprojects ONG/9I/76/IT,
ONC/I77/78/3/IT,OUC/53/80/IT).
CAPE VERDE378.037 283.528
75%
ONG/57/30/3
COMIDEEquipping ofasocial centre in
Xusoshi-Sodimiza ,Shaba
province .
ZAIRE27-054 13.527
50%
0NG/S3/30/±T
TERRA NUOV AEconomic and socio-cultural
advancement ofthe inhabitants
ofthe ElAlto area in LaPaz :
vocational and health training ,
creation ofacultural centre
and setting upofmobile
medical teams .
BOLIVIA488.557 I3I.9IO
27%
0NG,/";?/C0/LT
TERRA NUOV AEconomic and socio–cultural
advancement ofthe suburbs of
Guayaquil :vocational and
health training and setting up
ofnobile medical teams .
ECUADOR176.430 88.215
50%
ONG/ÓO/SO/IR:,*
CONCERNEquipment for the technical
school ,Nangwa (Arusha region ).
TANZANIA13.455 IO.O9I
75%
ONG./ói/30/NL*
ICCOIntegrated rural development for
the Indian population inthe
Salta region :agricultural and
health training ,supply of
means ofsubsistence and setting
upofcommercial units .
(Seeproject ONG/17I/78/NL)
ARGENTINA1.431.886 100.232
7%
0N0/Í2/80/NL*
CEBSXOSupport for local artisanat and
small-scale industries in
Quatre 3ornes and in10villages
onthe island .
MAURITIUS274.620 68.655
25%
Projects carried over from 1979 "to1980 .

-27-
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project iri
EUACommission grar.t
inSUA andas %
oftotal cost
ONG/Ó3/80/NL
NOVIBDevelopment ofalocal pharaia –!
ceutical industry ;purchase of
certain basic materials needed
manufacturing these goods in
Dacca .
(Seeproject ONG/2I7/80/UK)
BANGLADESH1.128.413 -I8O.546
16%
OÏÎC/05/80/F* .
COMITE CATHOLIQUE
CONTRE IAFAIM 2Γ
POUR LS DEVE LOPPΞ-
Ϊ'ΞΓΐΤ
(C.C.P.D. )Last phase ofasilo construction
programme ;Tra Noe Can Thosilo .
(SeeDrojects ONG/33/76/F,
0:;G/S4/77/F,02ÌG/79/73/F)
VIST NAM -350.035 I68.OI7 .
48%
ONC/65/So/lT
MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO .
EPACE
(M.S.P. )Fitting out ofacentre forhandi -
capped children inTuuru ,inthe
J'eru district .
KENYA227.77O
J113.885
50Jt .
0i.TC/ó7/S0/3
3R0EDERLIJK DELENImprovement ofcollective live-
stock rearing land for small and
nedium-scale niIkproducers in
San Jose andvilla Rodriguez ,
department ofFlores .
URUGUAY200.894 100.447
50%
ONG/7I/ÔO/3
COMIDE -Improvements toanagricultural
training centre inMontevideo .
URUGUAY -100.606
SP50.303 '
50%
ΟλΤ,/72/3θ/3
COMIDSConstruction ofabridge over the
river Kafubu atKasungani .
ZAIRE -100.336 50.168
50% ■
ONG/74/80/3
AMIS DU PERE
DAMIENCampaign against leprosy in
Anjouan and Moheli .
COMORES \-178.037 129.967
.73%■
ONC/75/80/3
WITHUIS VOLO ΝΤΑ-
ΗIAATCommunity development (health ,
nutrition andagriculture ),
Ubol province .
THAILAND132.292 66.146
50ss
*Project carried over from 1979 toI98O

-28-
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUACommission grant
inSUAandas%
oftotal cost
0rø/77/80/lT
ΚΑΝΙ TESEImprovement ofthehealth serwoe
onthe island ofCanhabaque .
GUINEA-BISSAU66.229 49.672
75a
ONG/73/80/F
SECOURS CATHOLIQUEEquipment forthe construction
ofreservoirs inOuagadougou .
UPPER VOLTA263.703 , 100.207
38%
ONG/3O/3O/F
UNION DSS AMIS ET
COMPAGNONS D'SMMA 'JSSetting upofaworkshop tomanu-
facture building materials fora
housing cooperative onthe out-
skirts ofMendoza .
ARGENTINA146.446 7-3.223
50%
ONG/8I/SO/UX
ACTION INDISTRESS
(Α.I.D.)Integrated development ,incon-
nection with the Sarva Seva Farms
ofthevillajes of .Sethur and
Sirangattupatti ,Madurai district
state Tamil Nadu .
(Seeprojects CNO/24/76/lT
ONC/IOO/77/IT,ΟΝσ/37/78/lT,
ONG/IO8/78/3/IT,OMG/II7/79/F,
ONG/I63/79/ITand0NC/32/30/IT)
INDIA703.II2 . 175.778
25%
ONG/32/30/1?
MOVIMENTO SVILUPPO
EPACE
(M.S.P.)Setting upofaSarva Seva Farms
demonstration centre toimprove
agricultural production and
facilitate thetraining ofperson­
nel inWarda ,Maharashtra state .
(SeeDrojec-fëONG/24/7Ó/IT,
OMG/lOO/77/lT,ONG/37/78/IT,
ONG/I08/78/3/1T,0NG/117/79/F
ONG/I63/79/IT,ONG/81/30/uK)
INDIA96.180 48.090
50%
ONG/33/S0/1T
MANI TESEPurchase and distribution of
ploughs andhoes forAcholi
district .
UGANDA,122.116 67.I64 .
55%
ONO/3J/3O/? .
COMITÉ FRANCAIS
POUR LACAMPAGNE
MONDIALE CONTRE LA
FAIM
(W ·"* '*rη \\ν·»♦^ »U·À1«^Rural development support pro­
-~r3.-j .-einthe province of
Chumbivilcas ;training offarmers
andorganising themarketing of
products .
PÎ?'JIO4.865 50.335
48%

-29-
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUA%
Commission grant
inEUA and as %
oftotal cost
OKG/27/S0/D
DIJJTSCKE VÍELTKUN -
CERHILFE
(D.W. H.H. )Microregional development :stock
farming and promotion ofaco-,
operative for the production of
seat and sale ofwood inthe
region ofValle Sagrado deLos
Incas near Cuzco .
PERU -255.329 97.025
38io
0NS/S3/80/UX
WAR ON WANT
(W.O.-.I. )'·Setting upofahealth service
inthe Umtali region .
ZIMBABWE246.220 113.261
46%
O:;G/33/6O/IRL
TROCAIREContribution tothe general
training programme ofthe
"Silveira House Training Centre "
Salisbury .^
ZIMBABWE102.755 72.95 6
71%
ONG/90/30/IRL '
TROCAIREContribution toraicroprojects
andthe'agricultural training
programme organised for the
whole ofthe country .
ZIMBABWE102.755 72.956
71%
m
ONG/91/SO/D
DEUTSCHE WELTHUN -
CSRHILFE
(D.W.H.H.)'Construction -ofwells invarious
villages inthe Thana district ,
Maharashtra state .
INDIAII4.355 ' .54.391
48%
0Ï.'G/92/30/D
KINDERDORP RIOEnlargement ofacoaraunity centre
dealing with vocational training
inNova Friburgo ,Rio deJaneiro
state .
BRAZIL653.218 297.214
45,5 %
ONG/93/3O/U:<*
THE INSTITUTS OP
CULTURAL APPAI RS
(J.C.Α.)Construction ofacommunity
centre ,school and housing in
Wofcumlawn .
JAMAICA83.359 37.558
44%
ON'G/9¿/3O/IRL
CONCERNConstruction ofhousing in
Singida .
TANZANIA29.617 22.213
75%
0.'~ 'Ό,I.iL
'CONCERN '
.. _Training inpoultry raising teciv
niques in10villages inthe
Irin.-;a rerion .'I3.928 I0.44 ¿
75 F°
Project carried over from 1979 1019S0 .

-30-
Project Reference -Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUA .Co.-nmission grant
inSUA and ?„s %
oftotal cost
O.VO/96/SO/lSL
CONCERNHealth education progranrae in
Xalapur Union ,Sriniangal
Thana,Sylhet district .
SANG ALDESH44.469 33.352
75£
O::G/,7/30/IRL
CONCERNHealth education progra-nnie in
Boyra Union ,Daulatpur Thana.~
3ANQLADS3H33.728 25.296
75%
}J!"j\Jjú
concernAgricultural development of
Guraanmardan Union ,Halthazani
Thana ,Chittagong district .
BANGLADESH•13.780 10.335
75!
0i»c/y9/30/3
S.O.S. /P.G.Construction ofarural and
artisanal educational centre foi
young people inKa-nonyi ,prefec -
ture ofGitaraJia .
RWANDA34.661 25.996 -
75%
o:."g/íoo/¿o/:rl
tsccairsSetting upofcooperatives for
small-scale coffee producers in
the province ofColon and Cocle .
PANAMA01.2161
15.304
25%
ON'G/102/äO/lHL
TROCAIREParticipation inaprogra.-n.Tie to
promote coopeatives inthe
Managua region .
NICARAGUA1.671.600 16.716
1%
GXG/ÍO3/30/B
CENTRE UNI VERS ITAI-
R3 FC'JR LA COOPS -
RATION ET LE DEVE­
LOPPEMENT
(C.U.C.D. )Increasing therural popul-
ation's awareness ofagricultujv -
aleconomic ,politicaj .and
social matters .
CAPS VERDE95.008 47.504
50%
ONG/IO4/8O/3
SOS FAIMParchase of 3grain aills for 3
villages inthe Dodoraa region
and setting upofabrick-works
and two joiner's shops inthe
Singida region .
TANZANIA29.617 I7.77O
60%
0::G/lG5/rC/3
sos ?Αΐ:·ίSupport for asait-~ining
cooperative inMatipwiri
village .
TANZANIA57.485 23.509
4Ifa

-31-
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUACommission grant
inSUA and as %
oftotal cost
oso/ioyao /?
CENTRE internatio­
nal DE L'EVE LC??E-
f-S .TΤET DE RECKER –
CHS
(C;1.5.8 .)Training andrehabilitation -of
juvenile delinquents inthe
Nianing centre .
SEAGAL53.534 26.817
50%
ONC/107/30/? .·
CENTRE INTERNATIO - .
NAL 22 DEVELOPPE­
MENT ET DS HECMER-
CHE
(C.I.D.H. )Improvement ofincome andtrain­
ing for families inbetter mana­
ge.-ent ofthe households-budget
inten villages inthe Kan
region . »
IVORY COAST
454.044 .1
'27.322 j
-,50lo
!
ONG/iOì/SC/F
centre γγγε^γιολ Η.
DE DEVELOPPEMENT ET
DS RECHERCHE
(C.1.3.3 .)Assistance for migrants inthe
Eyiney-Girao agricultural
colony .
"RA"!TL .53-970 26.985
' -50i
ONC/III/3O/-J:·; -
OXFAX
i
\Agricultural mechanization pro­
gramme ,puchase ofatractor for
afew villages inthe province
ofChimborazo .
ECUADOR -33.086 s. -16.543 *
50%
0N2 (/ii2/3o/TJfC
0XFA2ÍSupply ofpotable water tosmall
villages inthe Chimaltenango
and Solola regions .
GUATEMALA■56.872 28.436
50$
0NC/ll3/30/UX
0X?A_MParticipation inthe national
campaign against illiteracy .
NICARAGUA>143.344 71.672
50% -
QUO/ii-S/S0/NI-
NOVT3
■'i \
■VThree-year plan ofthe Coopera­
tive Movement for the sixth
(Timbuktu )and seventh (Gao)
regions toconsolidate the nu-
tritional self-sufficiency of
the recipient populations and
maintain the ecological balance .
(Seeproject ONC/213/So/UK)
KALI■> 4
2.708.200 ' 297.902
'11 %

Project Reference Brief description ofproject . Total cost of
project in
EUA'Commission grar.t '
inSUA and .is fu ■
oftotal cost
CÌIC/u3/50/D
ZSNTRA LST2LLS FuR
ENTWICK LUNGSHI LPSAgricultural irrigation in
Kunnanalai ,Seerapally and
'•Íelsatha-Tibur ,Sale.Ti district .
INDIA '23.64O
J,11.823
^50% '
O:;G/II9/SO/IT
CENTRO ORIENTAMHN -
TO EDUCATIVOCatting .-bwa thedrift tothe
tjv/nsbyimproving agricultural
techniques ,the health system
and social motivation inNdonko ,
jural coadune ofJfoalisayo .
CAMEROON143.398 -. 74.-I99
50%
o:;c/122/3o/o
DEUTSCHS W3LTHUN -
ÇSRHILF3
(D.W. Η.Η.)Agricultural irrigation inthe
co.'nuune ofCeladas ,canton of
Gua.Tiote ,province ofChiraborazo .
ECUADOR434.523\
175-932 '
40,5 °/°
ΟΊ.'Α/122/30/D
D3JTSCH3 W3LTKUN -
G2HHI LPS
(D.W. Η.Η.)Supply cfpotable wa^er to ■
"acete division ofKikuyu ,-
Xiarabu district .
:-:Ξ:.ΤΑ . ,162.534 ·i
40.646
25%
0"Ζ/'124/2θ/?
ORGANISATION FRAN­
ÇAISE POUR LAPRÄ -
VENTION D2 LA
CECITS
(O.F.F'.C. )"Yeleen "operation .Specialized
medical assistance .inophthaLno -
1oç-f ,care ,prevention ,educa -
tion and training ofthe popula­
tion inthe Barbara region .
"ALI -431.083 - 99.149
23^
ο:ία/;29/Ξΰ/?
CI/AD3Urbar .a_id rural -notivation
through educational and social
centres in3i'xfaya ,Jouar el
Bouache '.v,SinelFil,.Abey and
Hosta .
LEBANON ' .425.275·
 r-204.132 ,.
48%
ONG/I}O/5C/?
FEDERATION MOLIA -
LE DES VILLES
JUMELEES -CITES
UNIES
\..Drilling ofwells (equipped with
solar pu-Tips )forwatering school
vegetable gardens and improves®
ofvegetable gardens inDjibo ,
3ani and Sebba .
UPPER VOLTA
-127.107
,87.704
69£
'\ 1/A -·/"?V .'sJ ,-J--1·/ -
COV .ITE CATHOLIQUE
ΟΟΝΤΛΞ LA -'AIM 3Γ
PCUTì LE DLT.'LLÛ ?-
PEKENT
•(C.C.*.!>.) .Technical andartisanal ievelop -
r.er.·;ofahearing and sneech
instituts inAin-Aar .
LEBANON240.111 86.440
2¿.*

33
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in ,
' EUACommission grant
inEUA andas%
oftotal cost -
ONG/I32/8O/D
DEUTSCHE WELTHUN -
GERHILFE
(D.W. H.H. )Encouragement ofbeekeeping in
Nadhour .
TUNISIA ,114.798 57.399
50%
o:¡g/i34/3o/it
ISTITUTO PER LA
«¡OPERAZIONE UNI-
VERSITARIA
(I.C.U. )Setting upofarural health
centre inPacaran ,department of
Liaa ,Yauyos province .
PERU 'I24.O78 62.039
50%
OMC/135/30/D
DEUTSCHE WELTHUN -
GERHILFE
(D.W. H.H. )Irrigation and land improvement
inseveral villages inthe Sangli
district Maharashtra state .
INDIA .I48.878 74.439
'50%
0NG/136/30/D
GOSSNER MISSIONReconstruction ofadam at
Gwerabetal ,South province .
ZAKBIA61.006 29.893
49%
ONG/138/80/B
ASSOCIATION INTER -
NATIONALS DE DEVE -
10ΡΡΞΜΕΝΤ RURAL
(A.I.D.R. )Production ofmethane gas from
organic waste inanumber of
localities .
RWANDA467.489 289.843
62%
ONG/I39/8O/B
ASSOCIATION INTER­
NATIONALE DE DEVE­
LOPPEMENT RURAL
(A.I.D.R. )Production ofmethane gas from
organic waste inCibitke ,Ki :-
bumbu and Kiriri .
BURUNDI264.792 172.115
65%
ONG/I4O/8O/P
CENTRE INTERNATIO­
NAL DE DEVELOPPE­
MENT ET DS RECHER­
CHE
(C.I.D.R. )Setting upofacomposting unit
in E~^bey.
SENEGAL46.281 17.124
37%
ι
ONG/141/80/F
CENTRE INTERNATIO­
NAL DE DEVELOPPE -
ΜΞΝΤ ET DE RECHER­
CHE
(C.I.D.R. )Development ofpig farm inthe
Kan region .
(Seeprojet 0NC/12/79/F)
IVORY COAST28I.92O
ν138.141
49%

-34-
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUACommission grant
inEUA and as %
oftotal cost
ONG/142/8O/F
CENTRE INTERNATIO­
NAL DE DEVELOPPE­
MENT ET DE RECHER­
CHE
(C.I.D.R. )Assistance for market gardening
(experimental garden )inGrand
Douda .
DJIBOUTI68.198 31.030
45,5 %
ONG/I43/80/NL
ICCOIntegrated rural development for
the benefit ofthe Indian popu­
lation intheAsuncion region .
PARAGUAYI.323.9I3 198.587
15%
ONG/144/80/NL
ICCOContribution toatechnical and
vocational training programme in
Sao Päulo .
BRAZIL397.172 99.293
25%
ONG/I4Ó/80/NL
ICCOPotable water and sanitary faci-
lities for the members ofa
cooperative inCordoba .
ARGENTINA23O.9I4 99.293
42%
ONa/147/θο/υκ
WAR ON WANT
(w.o.w .)Improvement ofthe techniques
and economic bases for agricul­
tural production inthe Guidi­
maka region „
MAURITANIA585.338 245 =842
42%
ONG/I4S/80/UK jRehabilitation andtraining pro-
INTERNATIONAL DE-1gramme forformer politital
FENCE AND AID FUNDI prisoners inSalisbury .
FOR SOUTHERN j"ZIMBABWE
AFRICA j"204.360 102.180
50%
ONG/149/30/3
SOS FAIM ■
i
!Resettlement ofrefugees and
equipping ofartisanal workshops
inKakoni district ,Manicaland
province .
ZIMBABWEI62.OI9 II9.894
74%
ONG/150/30/3 jConstruction ofroads linking
WITHUIS VOLONTÀ - j8villages inOaxaca state to
λIAAT jfacilitate thetransport of
i Jagricultural products .
MEXICO
; 1 :141.632 70.81 6
50%
__– .–– –– 1

-35-
Project Reference!
Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
SUACommission grant
inEUAand r.s%
oftotal cost
CWC/155/30/3
FRERES DHSKOIKESDevelopment oftheNyakizu com­
mune :agricultural ,veterinary ,
artisanal andmedico-social pro­
gramme and further education ,
(seeproject ONC/47/79/3).
RWANDA .138.955 83.373
60%
0>ÍG/13Ó/30/D
TERRS DES HO.'CÎSS -
DEUTSCH LAMDIntegrated village development
programme fora"block "often
villages inTaluka Kholapur ,
Kolaba district ,Maharashtra
state .
INDIA24.981 15.488 ■
62%
ONG/L57/SO/0K
YOLUNTARY SERVICE
OVERSEAS
(V.S.O. )Setting upofamobile team for
themaintenance of ,equipment in
technical schools inthe north
ofthecountry .
SUDAN 'I3O.863
V12.432
9,5%
oxc/133/So/NL
CEBEXOConstruction andequipping ofa
cooperative forfishermem from -
Eravipuran -Quilon ,Kerala state .
INDIA161 .424 72.541
.45%
ONC/159/80/3
ASSOCIATION INTER­
NATIONALE DEDEVE -
LOPPEMENT RURAL
(Α.I.D.H. )Reduction intheconsumption of
firewood bytheproduction of
methane gas-organic 'fertilizer -
intheneighbouring rural areas
ofOuagadougou ,Kaya ,Kongoussi
and Goundy .
UPPER VOLTA203.951
*144.805
71%
1
ONG/IÓO/SO/SL
CE3EM0Construction andequipping ofa
social education centre for
young girls inKoidu .
SIERRA' LEONS .133.807 58.875
44%
OKC/152/SO/.VL
CI-■r'i.'l 1-LOConstruction ofacentre for
child care students inJakarta
Penjaringan district .
INDONESIA526.373 194.758
■37%

-36-
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUACommission grant
inSUA and as %
oftotal cost
ON'C/I^/SO/D:·:
U-LA.NDSKJAELP FRA
POLK TIL FOLK
(U.F.F. )Construction and equipping of
technical centres iasix
districts .
ζι:·3α.,'3195.658 97.834
50£
ONG/165/30/DK
DSN REJS3fD3
HØJSKOLESetting upofcombined workshops
(pumps andforges )troughout the
country .
ZIMBABWEI87.090 93.545
50%
OXG/I?O/SO/B
ILSS D3 PAIXInstallation ofsolar generators
used for micro-industrial deve-
lopment andirrigation inthe
Sahel area inthe arrondissement
ofBoure.Ti-Inali ,"cercle "of
Timbuktu .
¡•'ALII86.503 54.086 .
29% ■
OKG/I71/30/B
WITHUIS VOLO ΝΤΑ-
ΗIAATConstruction ofahorse for handi -
capped children inConcepción .
CHILE48.516 24.308
50%
ON'G/'17I/ZO/D
DEUTSCHS U3LTKUÏ ."-
CERHILFS
(D.W. H.H.)Setting upofacereals bank in
thedistrict ofUpper River and
McCarthy Island .
(Seeproject ONG/72/78/IRL)V
GAMBIA'161.122 80.561
50 ΊΟ
ONG/174/30/D
DEUTSCHE WELTHUN -
•CERKILFE
(D.W.H.H.)Construction ofaworkshop for
the production ofspecial agricul­
tural machines for Valley San
Lorenzo and Las Lomas ,province
ofPiura ,Bellavista ,province
ofSullana ,and Souyu ,province
ofAyabaca ,department ofPiura .
PERUI36.I48 . 68.074
.50%
DNG/175/80/D
DEUTSCHE WELTHUST -
GERHILF3
(D.W. H.H.)Construction and equipping ofan
artisanal centre in3arrio de
Toctiuco ,Quito .
ECUADORIOO.7OO 50.350
50£
3!:0/175/30/0
DEUTSCHE W3LTKUN :-
G3RHILF3
(D.W. H.H.)Construction ofatechnical
school fortraining agricultural
.-nechnnics inthe department of
Chin.aníega .
:FICA3A ~I\771.853 293.304
381»
1

-37
•- I
Próject Reference I3rief description ofproject
ιTotal cost of
project in
EUAI
Commission grant 1
inSUA and .is%
oftotal cost
•o::g/it3/80/3
VÌITHUIS VOLONTA­
RIATConst rue -ì.onofhousing in
KoIowa .- .
PAKISTAN231.222 140.611
50%
OKG/179/30/F
CENTRE DE RELATIONS
internationales
ENTRE AGRICULTEURS ·
POUR LSdevelopps -
:íe:it
(c.R.I. A.D.)Setting upofacereals bank in
the Ouar'coye arrondissement .
U°FER VOLTA.13.610 6.805
50%...
0NG/I33/30/UX
THE SA VE TMS
CHILDS Sí FUND
(3.C.F. )Improvement oftne health service
bypurchasing vehicles and equip­
ment .
UGANDA .063.594 v 112.811
17%'
ONG/Í34/ÕO/:JK
OXFAMSctension -ofapotable water .
system inRiîcira ,prefecture of
Kibur.go .
RWANDA25.154 --
13.077
50%
• "
C.NtG/13=./-0/3
PO"IDS POUR LACOOPE­
RATION AU DEVELOP -
PEME-NT
(P.C. D.)Reso't lenent òfrefugees inthe
Salisbury area .
ΖΙΤ'ΒΑΕ'ίΞ -208.759 · 96.029
46%
o;;α/137/ζO/lRL
TROCAIREYouth education programme :tech-
nical training ,award ofscholar -
ships inFort Victoria .
7TY"35 O'-r ?¿jJ.*' . ·,,> <_»142.313 22.850 .
.l6-?5
ong/î33/3o/ux ·.-
OX?A:· ; ''Land d«velorner ,tbyanirrigation
system centred onthe Cuvette άβ
Tegueye andthe Mare deNamga ...,
NIGER32.200 16,100
50%'
CNG/109/30/IRL
CORTA Purchase oftractors and ploughs
for the Alebubu district .
GHANA14.590 .7.660
52,5 %
O::C/i^:/3O/:?. L
Λ"™\TI'ΛA.V Agricultural training foryoung
people inTa.-3bur.an,· Sabah state .
*** r »ï*» ·*– «
--1.–A -O _L."Llb.O52 8.347
52f.

-38-
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
SUACommission grant
inSUA andis %
oftotal cost
o::c/i>2/3o/iiîL
CORTAAssistance forrural development
inthe Moya ."lfca,Kono ,3uxpe and
Kpawula regions .
SIFRRA L^ONS . , -30.542 I5.32I
50% ■.
O::C/I93/ÖO/IHL
CORTARural development ofPucara ,
province ofVallé Grande .
301,1TIA65.132 30.612
47 %
\
ο.νο/ι?</3ο/ϋ:<
NATIONAL CHILDREN'S
;··;ο:·2
(N.C.K. )Construction and equipping ofa
scr.ooi for the handicapped in
rCingston .
JAMAICA218.986 IO9.493
50* .
O.VG/LJ'î/SC/'UK
NATIONAL CHILDREN'S
Hc:s
(N.C.H.)Building alterations soaato
provide care for handicapped
children inKingston .
τ«»«» TO *'34-734 17.367 .
50£
οκα/Γ;ό/3ο/υχ
CHRISTIAN AIDEconomic training and promotion
ofcooperatives ,assistance with
legal ,agricultural and bookkeep -
ing matters inGuayaquil ,depart­
ment ofGuayas .
ECUADOR '82.5Ó8 41.284
50i
OÎÏG/I93/3C./3
S.O.S./?.s.
.Equipping ofartisanal units in
Natal ,Rio Grande doKorte state .
BRAZIL16.415 · 12.311
75%
CNG/2GO/3C/D
2ΞΓ??ΛΙ3·:^ΙΙΪ :-:<*R
ttWíicKUj;rcsHiL?3- .
Ι¿QUIPPMG ofaworkshop for re-
tiring agricultural machinery
IT'·Sao Paulo .
3RA::L199.446 99-723
50
CNC/202/80/iRL ,
TROCAIRSAc.ult LX••eracy ^jndeducation
programe ,health training ,youtl
training and organisation of
cooperatives inthe Tarkana
district .
ΚΕΓΥ Α 'Λ 226.414-
65-660
29ϊ>

-39-
Project Reference Brief description ,ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUA ·Co.iwiiesion grant
inSUA and as %
oftotal cost
0MC/205/30/D:C .
DANMARKS SFAÍíS -
KASSSPORS .'INOOrganization oftwotraining
courses for savings bank exe-
cutive staff ;one course for .
East Africa inAbidjan ,
IVORY COAST ,and one for Viest
Africa inJar-es-Salaaa,
TANZANIA7Q.793 I9.II4
27%
0:.*G/207/'3C/3
3.O.S./P.G.Extension tothe maternity unit
inNyundo .
RUANDA5O.725 24.348
48%
ONG/2ΙΟ/3Ο/ΙΤ
CIT.TIO I:XJH ::AZIO-
NAL3CROCEVIASetting upofatomat o-r.ar'<:eting
centre inLimatasbo ,Cuzco .
PERU52.O39 ' 21-336'
41%'
ΟΝ'3/2Π/2θ/:Τ
C2.TH0 ΙΠΏΝΑΖΙΟ -
NALE CROCEVIALand irrigation inthe Bajo
Piura region . ,
PERU -273.6I7 131.336
48% .
c:.;a/2i2/5o/.vL
CΞSEXOContribution tothe assistance
progranne for the "Depart eaento
Zonas "ofthe Vicaria deIa
Solidaridad inSantiago .
(Seeproject 0NG/175/79/NL)
CHILIS 'I.64I.I67 98.470
6%
ONG/213/30/UX
ZUGAS'ÍS FR0J3CTRepairing and equipping ofa
secondary school inInyanga .
ΖΙΜ3Λ3-ΓΞ156.757 . •II7.568
75%
0Ì;G/2I4/30/-JÌC
ZIK3ASWS FSOJSC?Repairing and equipping ofthe
Plumtree maternity unit and
dispensary .'I67.264 125.448
75%
OÍÍG/215/30/UK
ΖΙΊ3Α3'. /ΞFR0J3CTRepairing and re-ec[uipping of
the Lupane clinic . .
ZIM3.1~.V377.755 58.166
-75%
ONG/2LÓ/SO/UK
ZIM3A3W3 PR0J3CTRepairing and re-equiDping of
the Seaokwe clinic ,Kesi dis­
trict .
ZIJ-THA^ /FS' !.9I.O44 ' ■68.283
75%

ί–40^
Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
EUACommission grant
in3UA and r.s %
oftotal cost
ΟΚΣ/217/30/UK
OXFAMGeneral contribution tothe set-
ting upofapharmaceutical '
industry inDacca .
(Seeproject 0:ZG/Ó3/80/NL)
BANGLADESHI.I28.4I3 I2O.558
11%
OMG/213/30/UX
OXFAMThree-year plan oftheCooperative
Movement forthe Si:cth (Timbuktu )
and Seventh (Gao)regions ,to
consolidate the nutritional self -
sufficiency ofthe recipient
populations and maintain the
ecological balance .
(Seeproject 0:zc/ll6/8o/i.TL)
:'ALII.34S.ÔI4 188.306
14FI
i
0.\:0/220/30/'J>:
POFJLATIO :/CO.VCERNFamily planning association :
-equipping various clinics in
Dacca ;
-improving· the position ofwomei
inthe Chandpur region and in
Raribar Kallayan iCendra .
BANGLADESH50.262 25.131
50%
'
01/0/22l/30/UX
POFJLATIO :/CO;;CZRNFamily planning association :
-equipping ofpediatric units ;
-advancement of wo.men ;
-family planning information for
adults and teachers ;
inthe regions ofWest Java ,
Lampung ,Wesx Kali Mantan and
Central Java .
INDONESIA53.772 34.386
50%
O:/G/222/5O/UX
POFULATIÓ :/CC.VCSRÍÍFamily planning association :
-training ofleaders inthe
3angkok region ;
-encouragement for each coooer -
ative toset upits own fa-mily
planning centre intheprovince
ofSatun;
-improving the position ofwomen
inthe province ofUbol ;
information for teachers .
r"*"η37.05O 18.825
50 IO

Project Reference Brief description ofproject Total cost of
project in
SUACommission grant
inEUA and as %
oftotal cost
ONC/223/80/UK
OXFAMV
Health programme inMaejarim
for the native population and
refugees .
(Seeprojects ONG/6/77/UKand
ONG/82/78/UK)
THAILAND.55.580
I27.79O
50%
ONG/224/80/UK
THE SA VE THE
CHILDREN FUND '
(S.C.F. )Family planning association :
improvement ofchild care units
infour regions of.the country .
PAKISTAN205.480 102.740
50%-
ΟΝσ/225/30/UK
WAR ON WANT
(W.O.W. )Seating upofarural credit
system for Savar farmers ,Dacca
district . ·
BANGLADESH247-810 123.905
'50%
ONG/226/SO/IRL
TROCA IREPromotion ofyoung farmers'
groups inthe region ofLinares .
CHILE43.091 13.739
32%
OXG/227/8O/'JX
OXFAMImprovement ofhealth education
inthe region ofRaynah .
YEMEN (A.R. )179.146 S9.573
'50$
ONG/223/âO/UK
THE SA VE THE
CHILDREN FUND
(S.C.F. )Setting upofamedical and
health education centre in
Orissa state .
INDIA21.528 ,- 10.764
50i
ONG/229/ÔO/IRL
CORTAAgricultural training inPuerto
Perez ,including veterinary and
■biological aspects ,andagricul­
tural extension services .
BOLIVIA ·.53.031 27.57 6
52%
ONG/230/30/UK
VELLORE RURAL -
COMMUNITIES TRUSTSetting upand equipping ofa
centre for the health and
advancement women inK.V .
Kuppam Block ,Tamil Nadu state .
INDIA .90.642 ,45.321
50%
ONG/232/30/υχ
ZIMBABWE PROJECTTraining programme forcivil ,
servants inthe legal and
judicial field .
ZI?hBA3VTE .139.100 IO4.325
75%

-42-
TA31.3 II 3
LIS?0?BLOCK-GRANT ALLOCATION 'SIN1930
PROJECT REFERENCE
AND NGO3ENEFICIARY COUNTRYCOMMUNITY CRANT
INEUA
ONG/BG/I/SO/NL
ICC0Implementation ofmicro projects in
Tanzania .28.887
ONG/3C/2/fîO/F
SECOURS CATHOLIQUEImplementation of5micro projects in
India ,
Central African Republic ,
Upper Volta ,
Lesotho ,
Mali.38.792
O::G/BG/2/?O/?
CENTRE INTERNATIONAL
DEDEVELOPPAIENT ET
T)V
(C.I.D.R. )Implementation of7micro projects in
Bolivia ,
Ecuador ,
Brazil ,
Nepal ,
Mali ,
Comores ,
Djibout i.50.599
ONG/30/4/3O/P
CIVADEImplementation ofmicro projects in
Nicaragua ,
Mali .33.732
O.VG/BO/;/SO/D
DEUTSCHE WELTKUNGER -
HILEE (D.W.H.H. )Implementation of10micro projects in
Beni η,
Botswana ,
Kenya ,
Lesotho ,
Peru ,
Yemen (A.R. ),
Zimbabwe ,
Ehtiopia ,
India ,
Colombia .72.348
0NG/3C/7/30/IRL
TROCAIREImplementation of5micro projects in
Paraguay ,
Peru ,
Tanzania ,
India ,
Bolivia .21.887

-42-
PROJECT REFERENCE "·
AÎ>D NGOBENEFICIARY COUNTRYCOMMUNITY GRANT
INEUA ... ·
0NrG/BC/3/80/ü"<
"OXPAM ■
• " i . )Implementation ofnicro projects ia
Colombia ,
Ecypt . 'v- "■·
'Peru , '-
:Cuatera la?. ·.■·"'
Grenada .: " ".·...56.136
O>JC/3C/9/8O/:.'L
NOVIB ·'VImplementation ofmicro projects .in
■Mali , ·■1>J-■ ·-
Pakistan ," '
Rwanda , : ·'''
Kenya ,:
Sri .Lanka ,
Philippines . .' -·.■·28.8S7 ·
OÎ.'S/BG/IO/SO/B ·* ..
.BROEDERLIJK DELEN ..,'Implementation' ofmicro projects in ·
Rwanda.' ' .; - · ·' '''24.337
OÏ:C/3G/:I/SO/3~ .-
ENTRAIDE ETFRATERNITE'" " · ·-^'?
Implementation ofmicro' projects in
Zimbabwe .1 _ · S24.348 ■
CNG/SG/I2/?O/UK ' ■
:ΤΗΞ SAVE THE CHILDREN
PUND (S.C.?.)Implementation of7aioro -projects -in ··
Kenya , -.. '·' ■ν '■·._j
Botswana » '■ ■■·," .;''·.· ■■■\'
Lebanon , . ...7, '■"·,>
Dominica ,
India , -
Fäpua New Cuinea * : - ·■> ■■,,: :'40.16δ
ONG/3G/13/3O/IRL
CONCERN ,Implementation of3micro projects -in
Yemen (A.R. ),.; ■ .ν
Bangladesh , .'·. ■_
Tanzania . -'''29.182
CNG/BC/14/2O/UK
POPULATION CONCERNImplementation ofmicro projects in·
Hòng-Kong . .·26.754
ONG/3G/15/SO/ÑL
CEDEVOImplementation ofmicro projects ,in ·
Zimbabwe .;,'72.219
-ONC/SG/IS/SO/? ■
COiriTE CATHOLIQUE ' ,
CONTRE LAFAIM ET
(C.C.F.D. )
•Í
T; 1 ' /
Implementation of8nicro projects in
Peru ,'
Guatemala ,'
Conjo ,
Esuador , . ·
India , .
Cisjordan andGaza strip , '
•LVOTJ·' W1 ·
Uganda .73.368 ;
y . , .
X
î •..•••
• . . !

ZJ?17/20/i> :;.T.pIs-c-:;ta.►ionof4micro prDjeSvS ir: 1 26.957
! L/O-i-O... A.vJ.J t !
!iiira , j j
' ! ;
C*0/2C-/15/2D/I3L ,jirnpie-ervvvsion' ofrr.icro projects in | 2J..132
CC^'i'A i/Con/a, * ;
! !
I
!
i

-45-
TA3LE III­
A. BREAKDOWN OFPROJECTS COFINANCED INI98O BYBENEFICIARY COUNTRY .
3.BREAKDOWN OFPROJECTS COFINANCED INI98O BYCONTINENT .
«

-46-
A. BRFAKTXMN OPPROJECTS COFINANCED IN1930 BYBENEFICIARY COUNTRY
COUNTRYNUMBER OP
PROJECTSPROJECT REP . COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION IN EUA
ARGENTINA
t4 ONG/33/80/D
CNG/61/8O/NL
ONG/80/80/F
ONG/146/8O/NL59.026
100.232 . ,
73.223
99.293
331.774
BANGLADESH 8 ONG/63/8O/NL
ONG/96/80/IRL
ONG/97/80/IRL
ONG/98/80/IRL
ONG/217/80/UK
ONG/220/80/UK
ONG/225/80/UK
CNG/BG/13/80/IRI180.546
33.352
25.296
10.335
120.558
25.131
123.905
14.591 ,
533.714
•BENIN 1 ONG/BG/5/80/D 5.788
BOLIVIA 5 ONG/58/80/IT
ONG/193/80/IRL
ONG/229/80/IRL
ONG/BG/3/8O/F
ONG/BG/7/80/IRL131.910
30.612
27.576
8.602
2.408
201.108
BOTSWANA 2 ONG/BG/5/80/D
ONG/BG/12/80/UK9.405
803 K ;
10.208
BRASIL 8 ONG/16/80/D
CNG/30/80/B
ONG/92/80/D
ONG/109/80/ϊ·
ONG/144/80AL
ONG/198/80/B
ONG/200/80/D
ONG/BG/3/80/F12.808
20.920
297.214
26.985 '
99.293
12.311
99.723
6.072
575.326
BURUNDI 1 ONG/139/80/B 172.115
CAMEROUN 5
.ONG/9/80/IT
ONG/14/80/D
ONG/18/80/F
CNG/20/80/F
ONG/119/80/IT63.223
20.454
135.754
67.716
■74.199
361.346
CAPE VERDE · 3
,
'0NG/53/80/IT
3NG/54/80/IT
0NG/103/80/B283.528
283.528
47.504
. 614.560
i

-47-
COu:.THrnu:I~:R oi-"
paojzcTSPHOJSCT R3P . COMMIMITY CONTRIBOTIO "IM KJA
CENTRAFRIQUE
CriILE
CISJORDANIE ET GAZA
CCL0M3IA
COMORES ,
CON'GO
COTE D'IVOIRE
DJIBOUTI
DCMIMCA
ECUADOR
EGYPT
ETHIOPIACNG/3G/2/30/F
ON'G/171/8O/B
ONG/212/80AL
ONG/226/80/IRL
ON'G/BG/16/80/F
CN'G/BG/5/80/D
ONG/BG/8/0O/UK
ONG/BG/17/3O/B
ONG/74/80/3
ON'G/BG/3/80/F
ONG/BG/16/80/F
CKG/107/80/F
ONG/141/80/F
ON'G/205/8O/DK
ONG/BG/16/8O/F
CKG/142/80/F
ONG/BG/3/80/F
ONG/BG/12/80/UK
ONG/5/80/IT
CNG/59/80/IT
ONG/H1/80/UK
CNG/122/80/D
CNG/175/80/D
CNG/196/80/UK
ONG/BG/3/80/F
ONG/BG/16/80/F
CNG/BG/17/80/B
ONG/50/80/D
ONG/BG/8/80/UK
ONG/6/80/F
ONG/4C/80/F
CNG/3G/5/80/D24.308
98.470
13.789
9.405
10.105
9.739
129.967
7.083
27.322
138.141
9.557
8.070
31.030
6.072
87.304
88.215
16.543
175.982
50.350
41.284
6.072
11.739
9.739
193.580
19.086
95.034
18.793
8.6824.267
136.567
11.005
29.249
137.050
6.603
183.090
37.102
10.845
487.228
212.666
122.509

-48-
COUNTRYNUÎÎ32R 0?
PROJECTSPROJECT R2F . COMMUNITY C0NTR1BUT1ONINEUA
GA.M3IA 1
* y*
ONG/173/80/D 80.561
C-HANA 1 ONG/189/80/IRL 7.660
GUATEMALA 3 ONG/112/80/UK 28.436
ONG/BG/8/80/UK 4.491 '
Λ"ONG/BG/l6/80/F 11.739
S -44.666
GRENADA '1 CNG/BG/8/80/UK 5.052
> ! -'GUINEE-BISSAU -■1 ONG/77/80/IT 49.672
:HAITI 2 ONG/13/80/B 97.921
'ONG/38/80/F 97.389 ·
' 195.310 .
HAUTE-VOLTA - 8 ONG/19/80/B '83.666 . ''
ONG/25/80/F 84.844
ONG/51/80/F 52.180
'ONG/78/80/F •100.207 -
ONG/130/80/F 87.704
ONG/159/80/B 144.805
ONG/179/80/F 6.805
* ONG/BG/2/80/F . 2.715
562.926 ''
,. KONG-KONG 1 ' ONG/BG/14/80/UK 26.754
INDIA ' 14 ONG/81/80/UK 175.778· '~
ONG/82/80/IT 48.090
ONG/91/80/D 54.891
ONG/118/80/D 11.823
ONG/135/80/D-> 7^.439
• .-ÕNG/156/80/D 15.488
CNG/158/80/NL 72.641
·· ' ONG/228/80/UK 10.764
CNG/230/80/UK 45.321 ,
ONG/BG/2/80/F .15.517
CNG/BG/5/80/D 13.746
ONG/BG/7/80/IRL 1.313 '
CNG/BG/12/80/UK 12.452
'·? · CNG/BG/16/80/F; 6.603 .: .
- 558.866
INDONESIA 2 ONG/Ì62/80/NL -194.758
• ONG/221/80/UK 34.386
229.144
¿VvvAICA 4 ONG/93/80/UK " 37.558 '·
ONG/194/80/UK ,'109.493
'ONG/195/80/UK 17.367
0NG/3G/12/30/UK 7.230
' /- , .171.648 -

-49-
COUNTRY NIÏDER 0?
1PROJECTSPROJECT RE?. COÎCX'NITY CO >TRIBUTION IN SUA
ΚΕΝΥ Α 8 ONG/29/80/D
ONG/66/80/IT
ONG/123/30/D
GNG/202/80/IRL
ONG/BG/5/80/D
CKG/BG/9/80AÍL
ONG/3G/12/80/UK
ONG/BG/18/80/IRL67.817
113.885
40.646
65.560
3.617
4.622
1.606
29.182
327.035
LESOTHO 2 ONG/SG/2/80/F
ONG/BG/5/8C/D6.583
5.788
12.771
LIBAN 5 ONG/27/80/F
CNG/36/80/F
ONG/129/80/F
ONG/131/80/F
ONG/BG/12/80/UK"100.046
98.410
204.132
86.440
5.222
494.250
MADAGASCAR 1 ONG/15/80/D 20.394
MALAISIA 1 ONG/191/80/IRL 8.347
MALI 10 ONG/3/SO/B
ONG/12/80/F
ONG/116/80A"L
ONG/124/3G/F
ONG/170/80/B
ONG/218/80/UK
ONG/BG/2/80/F
ONG/BG/3/80/F
ONG/SG/4/80/F
CNG/BG/9/80/NL12.014
62.580
297.902
99.149
54.086
188.806
9.310
12.650
23.275
4.622
764.394
ILE MAURICE /MAURITIUS 1 ONG/62/80/NL 68.655
MAURITANIE 2 ONG/24/80/F
ONG/147/80/UK98.455
245.842
344.297
MEXICO 1 ONG/150/80/3 70.816
NEPAL 1 CNG/BG/3/S0/F 4.048
NICARAGUA 5 ONG/46/80/B
ONG/102/80/IRL
ON'G/113/30/UK
ONG/176/80/D
CNG/BG/4/8C/F99.335
16.716
71.672
253 .304
10.457
491 .484,
!
j
il
Ü
0
ÎJ

-50-•
COUNTRYNUM32R OF *
PROJECTSPROJECT RE5\ COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION IN EUA .
NICER 2 ONG/37/80/F
ONG/188/80/UK83.142
16.100
99.242
PAKISTAN 3 ONG/178/80/B
ONG/224/80/UK
ONG/BG/9/80/NL
 '1140.611
102.740
4.622
247.973
"PANAMA '1 ONG/100/80/IRL 15.304 .
. ·PAPUA NEW GUINEA 1 ONG/BG/12/80/UK 2.008
PARAGUAY,3 ONG/32/80/D
ONG/143/80/NL .
ONG/BG/7/80/IRL120.606 ' ·
..198.587
'5.909 · ,·'
325.102
PERU
ï ■ -
i ■ ■10 . ONG/86/80/F
ONG/87/80/D
ONG/134/80/IT
ONG/174/80/D
ONG/210/80/IT
ON'G/211/80/IT
ONG/BG/5/80/D
ONG/BG/7/80/IRL
ONG/BG/8/80/UK
ONG/BG/Í6/80/F50.335
97.025
62.039 ,
68.074
21.336 -
131.336
3.617
7.004
17.402
,11.006 ; ■-
469.174
PHILIPPINES . 2 ONG/49/80/D
ONG/BG/9/80/NL301.125 .-
•4.044
305.169
RWANDA 8 ONG/99/80/B
ONG/138/80/B
ONG/155/80/B
CNG/184/80/UK
ONG/207/80/B
ONG/BG/9/80/NL
ONG/BG/10/8O/B
ONG/BG/17/80/B25.996
289.843
83.373
13.077
24.348
•3.466
. 24.337
9.739
. 474.179
SENEGAL V 4 ONG/21/80/F
ONG/22/80/F
ONG/106/80/F
ONG/140/80/F36.380
33.732
26.817
•17.124 ■
-114.053
-'

-51-
CGC ":,THYl»«*321CP
IPROJECTSPROJECT· RE?. COKUNITY CONTRIBUÌ ION IXSUA
SIERRA LEONE 2 ONG/160/8O/NL
ONG/192/8O/IRL58.875
15.321
74.196
SOMALIA 1 ONG/44/8O/B 64.137
SUDAN 3 ONG/8/8O/B
ONG/23/80/F
ONG/157/8O/UK119.400
102.776
12.432
234.608
SRI LANKA 1 ONG/BG/S/8O/NL 7.511
TANZANIA II ONG/45/8O/B
ONG/47/80/LUX
ONG/60/80/1RL
ONG/94/8O/IRL
ONG/95/80/IRL
ONG/104/8O/B
ONG/105/80/3
ONG/205/8O/DK
ONG/BG/1/8O/NL
CNG/BG/7/8O/IRL
ONG/BG/13/80/IRI97.326
101.508
10.091
22.213
10.446
17.770
23.569
9.557
28.887
5.253
7.295
333.915
THAILAND 3 ONG/75/8O/B
ONG/222/30/UK
ONG/223/80/UK66.146
18.825
27.790
112.761
TUNISIE 1' ONG/132/80/D 57.399
UGANDA 3 ONG/83/8O/IT
ONG/183/80/UK
ONG/BG/16/80/F67.164
112.811
6.603
186.578
URUGUAY 2 ONG/67/8O/B
ONG/71/80/B100.447
50.303
150.750
VIETNAM 1 ONG/65/80/F 168.017
YEMEN (A.Rj 3 CNG/227/80/UK
ONG/BG/5/80/D
ONG/BG/13/8O/IK89.573
2.170
7.296
99.039

COUNTRY'NUMBER OP
PROJECTSPROJECT REP . 'COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION IN "EUA
ZAIRE 5 ONG/41/8Ο/Β 97~328
ONG/43/8Ο/Β 94.446
ONG/57/80/B 13.527
ONG/72/8Ο/Β 50.168
ONG/BG/17/80/B 9.740
265.209
ZAMBIA 2 ONG/28/80/B .58.339
ONG/136/80/D 29.893
88.232 ·
ZIMBABWE 17 ONG/88/8O/UK 113.261
ONG/89/80/IRL 72.956 -
ONG/90/80/IRL 72.956
ONG/148/80/UK 102.180
■ ONG/149/80/B •119.894
, ONG/163/80/DK 97.834
ONG/165/80/DK -93.545
ONG/185/80/B . 96.029
ONG/187/80/IRL 22.850
CNG/213/8O/UK •117.568 " .
ONG/214/8O/UK •125.448 , '-
ONG/215/80/UK 58.166
ONG/216/80/UK 68.283 .· . ·,
.' -ONG/232/80/UK 104.325
ONG/BG/5/80/D 10.130
ONG/BG/11/80/B .24.348
ONG/BG/15/80/NL 72.219
\1.371 .092
B.BREAKDOWN OFPROJECTS INI98O BYCONTINENT INEUA
AFRICA ,
ASIA
CENTRAL AND IATIN AMERICA
MEDITERRANEEN7.256.743
2.204.312
3.711.403
816.960

-53-
TABLE IV
CLASSIFICATION OFPROJECTS COFINANCED IN1930 (l)
- · *.NUMBER OF
PROJECTSAMOUNT IN ,
EUA'1°
1.FIELDS COVERED '-
Agriculture 50 3.987.O95 30
Education - 49 3.O92.519 23.
.Health 37 *1.866.401 14
Economy . 34 2.314.649 17
'.Communications -v
(means oftransport )"6 I99.559 1,5
Migrants and refugees 3 ■242.908 2
Social - 19 I.4O2.212 11
Miscellaneous 4 I94.294 1»5
'
- i3.299.637 100
2.SPECIFICATIONS
Construction –property 63 3.135.644 24
Equipment , 120 5.703.287 43
Transport 25 357.897 .3
Personnel –local labour 48 -839.183 β
–foreign labour 27 ; 574.209 4
Training ofleaders '34 519.654 4
Oiher specifications (starting-up
expenses ,planning ,services ,etc. ) 81 2.169.753 -, 16
\
-
'13.299.637 100
(l)These figures donotinclude block grants ;they -will beclassified when
the implementation reports are presented .

-55-
TABLE V
LIST OPNGO DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION PROJECTS COFINANCED INI98O
1
Project reference
and NCO SubjectTotal costs
ofprojects
in EUACEC contribution
in EUA and asa
percentage of
total cost
ONG/ED/I/8O/UK
OXFAMTeacher training programme tobring
aThird World Dimension into school
curricula .24.422 -12.211
50%
ONG/ED/2/SC/F iCatalogue offilms andother audiovi
CENTRE INTEïtNATIO -Jsual materials onThird World issues
NAL LEROCH3T0 Ν ¡- 11.244 -
•5.060
-45%
/
ONG/ED/3"/3θ/IT
NUOVI ORI SVITA-
MENTISeminars ,conferences and brochures
toinform teacher's andthegeneral
public onrelations between Europe
and ACP States .86.258 20.702
24i
ONG/ED/4/S0/UK
LATIN AM3RICA
BUREAUReports and seminars onrelations
between Europe and Latin America .
* _23.126 li.563
50%
ONG/ED/3/SO/F
AGRICULTEURS
FRANÇAIS ET
DEVELOPPERAIT
INTERNATIONA L
(A.F.D.I. )Programme ofwork with farming
groups tobring Third World Issues
into the debate onagricultural
policy . Λ91.965 34.027
37%
ONG/ED/5/3O/D - !Women intheThird Worl'd .A,pro–
WELTFRISD3Í3DIEN3T grame toinform women inGermany
(W.F.D. ) _ jonThird World ,issues .
' \6.264 ■3.132
■ :50%
ONG/ED/7/3O/UK
RUSKIN COLLECS
OXFORD
TRADE UNION
INTERNATIONAL
RESEARCH Aí,D -
EDUCATION GROUPDevelopment education programme to
stimulate discussion ofdevelop –
raent problems among trade unionista53.993 23.757
44$>
ONC/ED/9/8O/F
INSTITUT INTERNA­
TIONAL POUR LS
DIALOGUE DES
CIVILISATIONSSeminars with opinion formers in
business and Government topromote
cross-cultural understanding .79.135 17.014
21,5%

~56-
Project reference
and NGOSubjectTotal costs
ofprojects
inEUACECcontribution ;
inEUA and asa 1
percentage of '
total cost '
O?:G/ED/IO/8O/NL
CARRARA VOOR EURO -
PESE VORGING IN
ΚΞΤ NEDERLANDSE
ONDERWIJS
(C.E.V.K.O. )Programme ofwork inschools and
with teachers onLoné and relations
between Europe and theThird World ,14.665 29.83.3 !
26G 1
: I
. i
OWG/ED/H/30/UX
SCOTTISH EDUCATION
AÍJDACTION ?OR
DETELO Κ-ΓΞΝΤ
(S.E.A.B.)Education prograu-arae onnsw patterns
ofemployment arid investment ir.
Scotland ,Europe andthe Third World ,33-888 16.944
50$
,
.
ONG/ED/12/S0,/UX
OXFAMWoiien and develon:nent :publication
and distribution ofreport onNGO
activities andproposed follow-up
totheCopenhagen Conference on
Women ,58.135 27.905
45fa
O:;G/ED/Ì3/5O/DK
DANISH Υ,Ν.
ASSOCIATIONPaoiication anddistribution of ¡
booklets onLone II,andthe Lav/ ¡
oftheSea . !
Í'
I12,783
4~J%
ONC/ED/I¿/SO/U;<
THIRD WORLD PIRSTHi~her Education and Action for
Development inThird Level
Education .-44.274
:
122.137
50%
ONG/SD/I7/3O/P
MCUVSÍEIT Ïi>
TIERS HONDESchools andtheThird World . |
Analysis ofschool textbooks to j
promote Third World understanding . ¡
116.866
50%
I™ :

TABLE VI
SUMMARY OFPROJECTS COFINANCED FROM 1976 TOI98O INCLUSIVE
A. OVERALL SUMMARY ■
B. SUMMARY BY CONTINENT '■ ,
C. SUMMARY BY.NON-AC PBENEFICIARY STATE -
D. SUMMARY BYACP BENEFICIARY STATE
E. SUMMARY BY MEMBER STATE

AOVERALL SUXKA.RY INEUA -OFPROJECTS COFINANCSD FROM 1976 TO1930 (l)
TS1K
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
Stotal .DEVELOFMENT PROJECT .}
Num­
ber
of
pro­
jects
75
113
172
152
181
693Number of
NGOs
33
43
60
61
69of
whioh
new
NGOs
(2)
\
33
21
28
19
23
124Number of
benef iciary .
countries
of
which
new
coun­
tries
46
44
61
63
66U1
46
14
17
8
6
91Community
subsidy
2.468.555
3.940.400
11.019.593
11.909.840
13.989.418
43.327.806DEVEL0FKÏ EDUCATION
Nurn-
ber
of
pro­
jects
2
17
14
33Number of
Ï.GOs
15
13of
which
new
NGOs
(2)
15
8
23Community
subsidy
73.121
194.416
253.914
521.451COMMUNITY
SUBSIDY TO
THE LLAISON
C0MMITTSE
37.323
49.935
65.201
152.459TOTAL
2.468.555
3.940.400
11.130.037
12.154.191
14.308.533
44.001.716BALANCE
CARRIED OYER
TO FOLLOWING
FINANCIAL
YE&R
27.817
303.291
44.441
(1)Fibres up-dated asof31.12.1980 taking intoaccount thenon-implementation ofcertain projects .
(2)Compared with theprevious years .

B. ■SUMMARY IN EUA BY CONTINENT OP PROJECTS COFINA1ICED
FROM 1976 TO1980 (L) .
■TOTAL OF4YEARS
(1976 to1979 )/1980 'TOTAL
AFRICA 14.378.433 7.256.743 21.635.176
ASIA _ 7.764.131 2.204.312 .9.968.443
CENTRAL AND LATIN
AMERICA6.382.320 3.711.403 10.093.723
MIDDLE EAST 780.998 816.960 1.597.958
;MISCELLANEOUS 32.506 ' – 32.506
29.338.388 13.989.418 ' 43.327.806
(1)Figures up-^dated asof31.12.1980 taking into account the
.non–implementation ofcertain projects .

-60-
C.SUMMARY BYNON-AC PBENEFICIARY STATE (L)
TOTAL OP4YS3JS
(1976-1977-1978-1979 )I98O TOTAL
NUMBER
OFrao-
JECTSAMOUNT '
IN EUANUMBER
OF PRO-
JECTSAMOUNT
IN EUANUMBER
OF PRO-
JECTSAMOUNT
IN EUA
AFGHANISTAN 1 21.597 1 21.597
ALGERIE 1 86.844 - - 1 86.844
ARGENTINA 3 146.443 4 331.774 7 478.217
BANGLADESH 17 578.346 8 533.714 25 1.112.060
BOLIVIA 7 211.564 5 201.108 12 412.672
BRASIL 12 732.582 8 575.326 20 1.307.908
KAMPUCHEA 1 98.179 - - 1 '98.179
CHILE 8 767.033 3 136.567 11 903.600
CISJORDAN IE ET GAZA- - 1 11.005 1 11.005
COLOMBIA 5 447.965 3 '29.249 8 477.214
COSTA RICA 1 15.000 - - 1 15.000
CYPRUS 1 43.200 - - 1 43.200
DOMINICAN REP . 3 352.993 - 3 352.993 !
I
ECUADOR 13 643.291 9 487.228 22 1.130.519 !
1
EGYPT 4 203.079 2 212.666 6 415.745 !
EL SALV ADOR 2 180.232 - - 2 180.232
GUATEMALA 6 223.237 3 44.666 9 267.903
HAÏTI 6 495.080 2 195.310 8 690.390
HOM )URAS 3 82.319 - - 3 82.319
HONG-KQNG - - 1 26.754 1 26.754
INDIA 54 3.380.393 14 558.866 68 3.939.259
INDONESIA 17 606.353 2 229.144 19 835.497
JORDAN 3 21.314 - - 3 21.314
LIBAN 10 422.264 5 494.250 15 916.514
MALAIS IA - - 1 8.347 1 8.347
MAROC 2 14.232 - - 2 14.232
MEXICO 2 60.080 1 70.816 3 130.896
MOZAMBIQUE 1 4.472 - - 1 4.472
NEPAL 5 117.566 1 4.048 6 121.614
NICARAGUA 3 122.141 5 491.484 8 613.625
PAKISTAN 7 82.203 3 247.973 10 330.176
PANAMA 4 43.595 2 15.304 5 58.899
)Figures up-daied asof31«12«1980 takin a:into accour.t the non–implementat ionofcertain
projects .

PARAGUAY 4 201.059 3 325.102 7 526.161
PERU 10 591.915 10 . 469.174 20 1.061.089
PHILIPPICS 7 873.846 2 305.169 . 9 1.179.015
SOUTH KOREA 4 " 457.037 -.- 4 457.037
SRI LANKA 3 22.976 1 7.511 '4 30.487
THAILAND 9 371.975 *3 112.761 12 484.736 .
TUNISIE 2 40.200 1 57.399 '3 97.599
URUGUAY -4 150.390 2 150.750 6 301.140
VENEZUELA 1 25.000 *· 1 ,25.000
VIETNAM 11 ' 1.125.364 1 168.017 12 1.293.381
YEMEN (A.Ä.) 8 201.281 3 99.039 12 . 300.320
ZIMBABWE - – 17 , 1.371.992 17
I1.371.992
-
265 14.264.640 .125-" 7.972.513 ,390 22.237.153
(1)Figures up–dated asof31»12.1980 taking into account thenon–implementation
ofcertain projects . .

-62-
d.s^ca-jc :sracp32.'s?icx<i3Y stats (i)
TOTAL 01-'4TSARS
(1976–1577 –1976 –1979 )1980 TOTAL
p.U.:323 C?
;PS0J2CT3A?.ou:rr NU"B2 CP!
FH0J2CT3 F30JDCT3A.VOUNT
i:-r 3JA
2
4
4
17
'5
1
2
1
10
J.
5
3
1
28
4
16
5
1
2
8
17
544.000
76.289
272.525
754.153
767 .704
138.002
34.193
334.533
187.061
214.675
194.914
303.523
332.734
44.559
4.363
238.725
63.731
1.358.397
165.892
S26.435
181.542
38.714
14.855
501.255
919.983
501.252
363.929
37.701
7.729
29.4751
2
1
5
3
1
Λ.
2
1
4
2
i
10
1
2
25.788
10.203
172.115
361.345
614.560
4.257
137.050
6.603
183.090
37.102
'10.845
122.509
80.561
7.660
5.052
49.672
562.526
171.648
327.035
12.771
20.394
764.394
68.655
344.297
99.242
2,0083
6
5
22
8
2
2
2
12
4
2
13
1
5
4
2
7
1
36
8
24
7
1
3
8
27
6
5
5
3
449 .
86 ,
444 .
1.115 .
1.382 ,
142 .
137 .
'40.
517 .
224 .
225 .
317 .
303 .
332 .
125 .
12,
5.
288 .
63.
1.921 .
337 .
1.153 .
194 .
38.
35.
501 .
1.684 .
569 .
708 ,
186 .
7.
■31.788
.497
.640
.499
.264
.269
.050
,796 !
.628
.163 !
I
.520 j
.423 I
.523 i
.734 j
.120 j
.023 j
.052
,397
.731
323
540
470
313
714
249
255
.377
SQ7
226
,943
.729
.487

-63-
Γ–~~"–"
!RV.70.-DA 24 1.254 .693 8 474.179'32 1.728.872
S£NTG /\L » 22 . 2-.179 .137 '' 4 114.053 26 .'2.293 .ISO
»
SEYCHELLES -- 2 25.020 - -*>4. 25.020
SIERRA LECNE 11 208.169 2 74.196 13 232.365
SOMALIA 1 172.777 . .1 64.137 2 236.914 ¡
SUDAN 6' 156.754 3 - 234.608 91391.362 í
SWAZ ILAND 3 S3.398 - - '3 . 93.3S8
TANZANIA 30 916.662 11 333.915 .41 1.250.577
TCHAD 2 19.559 - 2 19.559
TOGO 3 110.908 3 110 .9C8 '
-TONGA
\1' . -91.795 - 1 91.7S5
TRINIDAD ¿cTOBAGO 1 33.114 - - 1· 33.114
UGANDA 2 '"119.208 3 186.578 5 305.786
ZAIRE ■14 ' ' 560.224 5 ,265.209 19 ■ 825.433
ZA>3IA 7 96.972 2 88.232 9 •185.204
•299 15.041.242 108 6.016.905 407 21.058 .147 ί
1
ACΡ 299 15.041.242 108 6.016.905χ
407 . '21.058.147
'XO.V ACΡ 266
1.14.264.640 125 7.972.513 391 - 22.237.153
GRAJTO TOTAL'
(Tables C+D) 565 '29.305.-882 233 13.989.418 "798 43.295.300
- (2) (2) (2)
(1)Figures updated asof31.12.1980taking intoaccount thenon-implementation of
certain projects . ' .. •
(2)Assorso JTCOs introduce projects forimplementation inariu-nber ofcountries ,this
iigure ist*ius different iro.-a that forthenuaber ofapproved projects .

Ε. ΒΙΛΟΙ'ΙΗΥ ".IΝΕ^Α .'ΛΎ '.~:~:~ΓΤ· {Γ,·%·,?:■: Ο·71:)··.·;;·:!ΓΡν^ΥΤ 1Ρ30.7]·^Τ3 Γ.θνΤί;ΛΚΓ::-ΤΓ )Γ3ΛΜ.->u.--vin:, i:/iJ.i ,iil jV .-s iV.U:" t-rfvJJii /JTa l/J.-'J.r.Ai.UrJJ iRUM
197-5 1-01930 (1).
•
TOTAL OF4YEARS }0]ζ TO1979 19S0 TOTAL OF 5YEARS 1975 TO1930
MEMBER STATESNUMBER
OF
NGOsMUÍ· !BEH
OF
PROJECTSCOMMUNITY
SUBSIDYÎPJMESR
OF
NGOsNUMBER
OF
FR0JECT3COMMUNITY
SUBSIDYNUMBER
OF
NGOsNUiiBER
OF
FROJSOTSCOL'MJiVITY
SUBSIDY
BELGIUM 20 72 5.368.672 16 36 2.690.410 24 108 8.059 »082
DFÆ'ARX 6 10 ■ 579.560 3 3 210.493 8 13 790.053
F·ίΙ)·· :;·:·Μ,REFJBLIC
OF GERÎ-IANY 16 ' 86 7.810.226 8' 24 2.314.970 20 110 10.125.196
FRANCK 19 89 5.722.417 16 34 2.507.153 25 123 8.229.570
iiiïïiAiro 5 62 1.130.973 3 21 561.731 5 83 1.692.704
ITALY 12 42 2.392.460 7 14 1.505.429 13 56 3.897.889 -
LUXEMBOURG 2 5 123.499 1 1 101.508 2 '6 225.007
NBTHE31AM)3 3 47 2.624.863 3 14 1.599.245 3 61 4.224.10 8
UNITS !)KINGDOM
i
i17 99 3.585.718 12 3^ 2.498.479 24 133 6.084.197
í
!
j TOTAL 100 512 29.338.388 69 181 13.989.418 124 693 43 ..327 .806
V-π–––––––r;~..r =___ _____ ,
·–===-===. -
(]) Pi/jaren up-dated-Sof 3Κ12.193ο ta''inj into accoi -ntthe non-implementation ofcertain projecto