COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 
Brussels, 06.11.1996 
COM(96) 559 final 
Communication from the Commission 
to the Council and the European Parliament 
The SLIM Initiative 
Report of the Commission on 
the SLIM Pilot Project 
Simpler Legislation for the Internal Market 

Communication from the Commission 
to the Council and the European Parliament 
The SLIM Initiative 
1. The SLIM initiative (Simpler Legislation for the Internal Market) was launched in 
May 1996. With strong encouragement from Internal Market Ministers, it was targeted 
to identify ways in which Single Market legisiation.could be simplified It forms part of 
the Commission's Confidence Pact for Employment. Simplifying legislation can 
contribute to the Pact's objectives of enhancing the competitivenes and employment-
creating potential of business. It can also help to make the workings of the Union more 
transparent and effective, without endangering necessary protection for the citizen. 
The "Better Law-Making" report to the European Council at its Dublin meeting in 
December 1996 will provide an overview of Community action on simplification. 
In small SLIM Teams, four or five experts from Member State administrations worked 
together with the same number of representatives of users of the legislation. Each 
Team was chaired by a Chairman personally nominated by the Commissioner respon­
sible for the legislation in each of the four sectors that had been chosen for the first 
phase of the exercise: Intrastat (the system for collecting intra-Community trade statis­
tics); construction products; the recognition of diplomas; and the ornamental plants 
sector. Member States were invited to submit their views in writing. The Commission's 
report oh the first phase is annexed to this communication. 
Recommendations of the SLIM Teams 
2. The nature of the SLIM Teams' recommendations and the degree of simplifica­
tion or improvement that might result varies from sector to sector. In the case of Intra­
stat, specific simplifications have been recommended that can be implemented in the 
short term with more radical options as the basis for future consultation and action. 
The other Teams have put forward recommendations or options that will be of great 
help to the Commission in coming to a view on the way forward. In the case of 
construction products, the options considered could contribute to opening up a vitally 
important sector where the proper functioning of the Single Market has so far remained 
blocked. 
3. Each SLIM Team identified a number of avenues towards simplifying or improv­
ing the legislation. Their reports are available on request. 
(i) The outcome of the Intrastat exercise reflects the in-depth studies that had 
already been undertaken. The recommendations include simplifying, or no longer 
collecting, certain data from 1 January 1998; a substantial reduction in the number of 
subheadings in the nomenclature from 10,500 at present to approximately 6.500-
7000; and adjusting the collection system or introducing a new one to reduce the 
burdens on business. This could involve more use of sampling, a two-tier system 
reducing the frequency of detailed returns and/or use by a group of Member States of 
the single flow system, based only on export data. 
The Commission's response - Steps are already being taken to implement some of the 
recommendations on reduced data requirements. The Commission supports the idea 
of using a simplified nomenclature which still reflects the majority of user needs without 
increasing the burden on enterprises also involved in external trade transactions. This 
simplified nomenclature should not exceed 7.000 positions and should be operational 
on 1 January 1998. It also agrees with the SLIM Team that the different frameworks for 
the collection of statistics should be examined. In particular, the Commission has to be 
prepared to adapt legislation to allow Member States who wish to introduce the single-
flow system for intra-Community trade statistics to do so. The Commission will initiate 
studies of the two-tier approach and possible application of sampling for completion by 
1999. 
(ii) The construction products team put forward three options, with its views on the 
pros and cons of each. These ranged from improving the working procedures of the 
Commission and the European staodardisation bodies to the radical option of abolish­
ing the compulsory link between the application of the Construction Products Directive 
and the availability of harmonised standards. A third option, in two stages, was also 
considered. 
The Commission's response - The Commission will come forward with proposals along 
the lines of the report of the team. It intends to pursue the suggestion consisting of a 
combination of short term measures which are likely to accelerate the implementation 
of the Construction Products Directive and longer term measures, providing a new 
basis for future achievements with regard to a complete and coherent system for the 
construction sector as a whole. 
(iii) The diplomas Team favoured the retention of sectoral directives for individual 
professions where they already exist; however, a majority proposed that the Commis­
sion re-examine the question of a transfer of the professions covered by these direc­
tives to the General System for the recognition of diplomas following the 1999 review. 
The Team also suggested streamlining aspects of the legislation, particularly in relation 
to the operation of the advisory committees concerned and the criteria governing 
education and training. 
The Commission's response - The Commission will come forward with proposals in 
1997 to streamline the working of the Advisory Committees and to simplify the updat­
ing of lists of diplomas eligible for automatic recognition. It intends to pursue the 
suggestion that a more output-oriented approach to the definition of education and 
training requirements should be introduced in the context of a review of the education 
and training requirements of the nurses' directive. The Commission will also undertake 
an examination of the possible transfer of the professions concerned to the general 
system following the 1999 review of that system. 
(iv) The ornamental plants Team was sharply divided on the question of whether 
there should even be any Community legislation in this field. If retained, that legislation 
should be clarified and simplified. For example, there should be differing forms and 
degrees of control at different stages of the production/distribution process and the list 
of species covered should be determined at least by reference to their economic 
importance, the regime governing imports from third countries should be reviewed and 
further efforts made to achieve better coincidence with Community plant quarantine 
controls. 
The Commission's response - The Commission will come forward with proposals by 
May 1997. These proposals will be based on a thorough examination of the different 
options put forward by the SLIM Team. 
A^ 
-3 
Evaluation of the SLM working method 
4. The overall assessment of the SLIM approach is that it can work and has already 
borne fruit so far. The Commission has demonstrated its commitment to simplification 
in this first phase of SLIM. Therefore, the Commission intends to pursue the project 
and to come forward with an extension of SLIM into a second phase involving other 
sectors. However, for this to be feasible, the Council must show equal resolve by 
assuming its political responsibilities. It must, in particular, endorse the working method 
and it must commit itself to taking the necessary actions to achieve concrete results. 
This implies not only being ready to accept the proposals the Commission will present 
concerning Community legislation, but also that Member States devote equal attention 
to simplifying national legislation where necessary. 
Drawing on the lessons of the first phase and the advice of Member States through the 
Internal Market Advisory Committee in conjunction with other appropriate fora, the 
Commission will identify the sectors for the next phase. The Commission will formulate 
the remit of each SLIM Team as clearly as possible, allow adequate time for the prepa­
ration of reports and ensure the fullest possible transparency vis-à-vis all Member 
States. During this second phase it will report to the Council on the follow-up to the 
initial group of sectors as well as progress on the second group. Further extension will 
depend on concrete results being obtained. 
The role of the Member States 
5. The Commission emphasises that Member States must demonstrate their own 
commitment to the challenge of simplifying legislation. The Commission's review of the 
Impact and Effectiveness of the Single Market concluded that the successful abolition 
of the "first line" of market-fragmenting measures has increased the importance of 
removing remaining national regulatory obstacles to cross-border transactions and that 
there is little sign yet that Member States are ready to observe the self-discipline in 
rule-making that they advocate so firmly for the Union. Only Member States can 
respond to this challenge and the Commission calls upon the Council to commit itself 
to that task to the fullest extent. 
Report of the Commission on 
the SLIM Pilot Project 
Simpler Legislation for the Internal Market 
A ui 
-2 
1. I The Initiative 
1.1. Simpler legislation can improve the competitiveness of business and enhance 
its employment creating potential1 and can also contribute to the transparency and 
effectiveness of Community action, while continuing to ensure a high level of protection 
for the citizen. The SLIM initiative responded to the growing call from business and 
professional circles for legislation that achieves its objectives while avoiding imposing 
unnecessary burdens. The Council formally endorsed the initiative in its resolution of 
8 July on legislative and administrative simplification in the Internal Market and the 
European Council called on the Commission to report to the Council on the SLIM pilot 
project by the end of 1996. The initiative is to be viewed in the context of the Commu­
nity's efforts to improve the competitiveness of business and its employment-generat­
ing potential, as indicated by its inclusion among the measures designed to promote 
competitiveness in the Commission's Confidence Pact for Employment. 
1.2. The SLIM pilot project is a new phase in the efforts of the Commission to 
simplify and improve legislation so as to lighten the burden of regulation on business 
and the professions in the single market while still achieving Community objectives2. It 
is based on a new working method, bringing together, in small Teams, four or five 
experts from national administrations and an equal number of representatives of the 
users of the legislation. Each team is chaired by a nominee of the Commissioner 
responsible for the sector concerned. Working against very tight deadlines, these 
Teams were asked to come forward with suggestions for simplifying legislation. Four 
areas were scrutinised: the Intrastat system of statistics for intra-Community trade, 
construction products, the recognition of diplomas and ornamental plants. The conclu­
sions drawn by each Team would permit the Commission to decide what further action 
is called for. The Teams consulted the Member States which did not have an expert on 
the Team and received written submissions from interested parties. 
1.3. The pilot project has yielded positive results. The Commission considers that, 
given the time constraints (only three to five working days were available) and the 
complexity of the issues confronting the SLIM Teams, the results validate the working 
method used and justify considering its extension to other areas of legislation under 
certain conditions, particularly with a view to encouraging innovation in Europe. For its 
part, the Commission intends to take action in each of the four areas. However, the 
Commission emphasises that the success of the initiative can ultimately be judged only 
in the light of the ability of Council and Parliament to accept legislative change in the 
interests of simplification. 
2. | The working methods of the SLIM Teams | 
2.1. Between June and early October 1996, each SLIM Team met for a total of 
between three and five days. In general, the limited number of participants and their 
familiarity with the sectors concerned facilitated an informal working atmosphere and a 
frank exchange of views. This enabled ideas to be discussed in a more open way than 
would have been possible in a more formal setting. The Teams displayed a willingness 
in many cases to include options for simplification or improvement in their reports 
See Commission Communication of 8 May 1996 on the SLIM pilot project (Simpler Legislation for the 
Internal Market) - COM(96) 204 final. 
2 
The Commission's work on simplification and related matters has been the subject of reports to the 
end-of-year meetings of the European Council in 1993, 1994, 1995 and June 1996. The report entitled 
"Better Law-Making"will be presented to the European Council at its Dublin meeting in December 1996. 
which were not favoured by all members. This has been reflected in the reports, in 
some cases with an indication of the positions of individuals. The meetings were 
supplemented by written exchanges, particularly with regard to the finalisation of the 
reports. The secretariat was provided in each case by the Commission department 
responsible for the sector. 
2.2. The Teams consulted all Member States: the INTRASTAT Team on the basis 
of some 30 individual "proposal sheets", the diplomas Team on the basis of a short 
consultative document, the ornamental plants Team and the construction products 
Team by a simple written invitation. Many representative organisations also made 
written submissions3. The written submissions were of considerable assistance to the 
Teams and were taken into account in drawing up their reports. 
3. | Summary of results of the pilot project4 
3.1. INTRASTAT 
3.1.1. Background - The Intrastat system was introduced in 1993 to allow the compi­
lation of statistics on intra-Community trade in the absence of data formerly collected 
at borders. The information is collected from about 430,000 firms (some two thirds of 
firms are exempt). 
3.1.2. Problems - The system is costly both to enterprises and to administrations. The 
statistics produced at EU level are not of sufficient quality and become available too 
late. Efforts have been made to overcome these problems, but all proposals for simpli­
fication are confronted with a conflict between the desire of firms to be relieved of 
reporting burdens and the demands of users of the statistics for detailed information. 
3.1.3. Key points of the SLIM Team report - The proposals for simplification aim at: 
• reducing the data requirements to the minimum needed to produce intra-
Community trade statistics; 
• using a simplified goods nomenclature, which covers the majority of users 
needs; 
• adjusting the collection system or introducing a new one to reduce the bur­
dens on business; 
• support measures to ease the introduction of the revised system. 
The SLIM team recommends that from 1 January 1998, a number of data elements 
should either be simplified or should no longer be collected, especially those of limited 
interest. These should be announced to business as a single package in order to 
minimise the costs of adaptation. 
The SLIM Team also recommends a substantial reduction in the number of subhead­
ings in the nomenclature. Using the Harmonised System 6-digit level as a basis, a 
number of subheadings from the existing Combined Nomenclature (CN) could be 
added. This would bring the number of commodity codes down from 10.500 to 
approximately 6.500 - 7.000. A joint committee should be established to consider the 
justifications for these additional subheadings. The new nomenclature, HS6+, will be 
Lists of the contributions received have been appended to the individual reports of the Teams. 
4 
These summaries of the issues confronting each SLIM Team and the recommendations or options put 
forward by them has been prepared by the Commission. More details are provided in Annex 1. However, 
reference to the individual reports, which are available from the Commission, is essential to a full 
appreciation of the work of the Teams and in particular to an understanding of the underlying arguments 
and of the varying degrees of support from Team members for the recommendations and options 
-4-
optional for the declarants, who may continue to use the CN. The detailed results on 
intra-Community trade will, however, be made available according to the HS6+ 
detailed level. 
Regarding collection systems, the SLIM team supports the idea of introducing systems 
in the future that will involve fewer enterprises or otherwise substantially reduce the 
overall declaration burden on business, while being acceptable from the point of view 
of the quality of statistics. Four frameworks for the collection of statistics have been 
considered, some of which could be combined. However, these suggestions require 
further study before any proposals can be made. 
The introduction of the simplification initiatives should be accompanied by continuing 
actions on the modernisation of collection and compilation systems and the return of 
statistical results to data providers. The EDICOM project, which promotes the use of 
electronic data interchange for statistics and computerised tools, will contribute to 
these activities and its continuation should be approved without further delay. 
3.1.4. Commission Response - The Commission is already taking steps to implement 
some of the recommendations regarding reduced data requirements. It supports the 
idea of using a simplified nomenclature which still reflects the majority of user needs 
without increasing the burden on enterprises also involved in external trade transac­
tions. This simplified nomenclature should not exceed 7.000 positions and should be 
operational on January 1, 1998. It also agrees with the SLIM Team that the different 
frameworks for the collection of statistics should be examined. In particular, it has to be 
prepared to adapt legislation making it possible for Member States who wish to intro­
duce the single-flow system for intra-Community trade statistics to do so, and will initi­
ate studies of the two-tier approach and the possible applications of sampling to be 
completed by 1999. 
3.2. CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS 
3.2.1. Background - The construction sector represents 9% of GDP within the Union 
and involves 2 million enterprises. Construction products legislation at Union level is 
unique in the sense that all construction products are regulated through a single Direc­
tive (the CPD), Directive 89/106 of 21.12.1988 on the approximations of laws, regula­
tions and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction 
products5. 
3.2.2. Problems - Regulating such a large sector of the economy through a single 
Directive was known from the beginning to be quite ambitious and its implementation 
to date has been unsatisfactory. The functioning of the Single Market through this 
Directive requires adoption of Technical Specifications, either Harmonised Standards 
or European Technical Approvals or recognised National Technical Specifications. 
Eight years after the adoption of the CPD, none of these are available, so that the 
Single Market in this sector has yet to become a reality. 
3.2.3. Key points of the SLIM Team report - The SLIM Team put forward three 
options: 
• Improvement of working procedures of the Commission and the European 
standardisation bodies for delivering Technical Specifications in particular 
with regard to Harmonised Standards: this option, which would not require 
any modification of the Directive, aims in a short time perspective to improve 
the procedures for its implementation. 
5 OJL40, 11.2.1989, p.12 
-5-
• Abolish the compulsory link between the application of the Directive and the 
availability of Technical Specifications. This would allow industry to be able 
to start to put their products on the market with the CE marking on the basis 
of independent certification without reference to Harmonised Standards, as 
in other "New Approach" Directives. 
• A two-stage option: improve working procedures as at the first point starting 
immediately and, in parallel, developing an action to bring closer together 
national regulations on construction works. (A comprehensive system of 
common standards for products would be more easily supported by common 
rules on construction works.) In the light of the progress made, the situation 
could be re-examined with a view to aligning the CPD with the principles of 
the "New Approach" or repealing it. 
The SLIM Team points out that the first option would have the advantage of being able 
to be applied without delay. The second option would have the advantage of re-instat­
ing, for standards, the role of independent support to regulations, as conceived in the 
"New Approach". They comment, however, that there is little confidence in construction 
circles in a system built on direct compliance to essential requirements. The opening of 
a procedure for formal amendment of the Directive could also run the risk of reopening 
discussion of the text beyond the initial intentions and result in a period of juridica! 
uncertainty. Finally they point out that the third option provides a solution of short term 
measures which are likely to accelerate the implementation of the CPD while at the 
same time providing a new basis for future achievements with regard to a complete 
and coherent system for the construction sector as whole. 
The Team comments that simplification of procedures, as envisaged under SLIM, and 
the thereby reduced burden on manufacturers, is probably more evident in the second 
and third options. 
3.2.4. Commission Response - The Commission will come forward with proposals 
along the lines of the report of the team. It intends to pursue the suggestion consisting 
of a combination of short term measures which are likely to accelerate the implemen­
tation of the Construction Products Directive and longer term measures, providing a 
new basis for future achievements with regard to a complete and coherent system for 
the construction sector as a whole. 
3.3. RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS 
3.3.1. Background - Seven sectoral Directives governing doctors, nurses responsible 
for general care, veterinary surgeons, dental practitioners, midwives, architects and 
pharmacists, were adopted between 1975 and 1985. With the exception of the Direc­
tive governing architects, these Directives lay down minimum common standards of 
education and training for the profession concerned and contain lists of national diplo­
mas which meet these common standards and as a consequence benefit from auto­
matic mutual recognition. For architects, the Directive lays down certain criteria which 
must be met in order for a diploma to benefit from mutual recognition; however, 
Member States may continue to award diplomas in the field of architecture which do 
not meet these criteria and, as a result, fail outside the scope of the recognition 
provided for in the Directive. 
3.3.2. Problems - The sectoral approach, which creates a certain European profile for 
education and training, obliged many Member States to amend national legislation 
governing access to the professions concerned and in some cases (for example, 
dentists in Italy and Austria) it required the creation of a profession which had not 
previously existed. The sectoral Directives may also impede reform at national level 
when the changes envisaged would render national rules incompatible with the rale-
.•-..•.£•;..:• - -6-
vant Directive. This was one of the reasons which led the Community to adopt a new 
approach to recognition of diplomas - the general system - which leaves to Member 
States the decisions as to the appropriate level and structure of education and training 
and the need for regulation. However, the general system, unlike the sectoral Direc­
tives, does not offer the migrant a guarantee of automatic recognition. 
In addition, the need to keep the agreed common rules on education and training 
under review resulted in the creation, for each sectoral Directive, of an Advisory 
Committee. These committees, which are currently composed of 45 members, place a 
considerable administrative burden on the Commission. They issue recommendations 
and opinions addressed to the Member States and also advise the Commission as to 
whether amendments to the Directives are necessary; in practice, few of their recom­
mendations for changes to the Directives have met with the approval of the Member 
States. 
3.3.3. Key points from the SLIM Team report - The SLIM Team favoured the retention 
of sectoral directives for individual professions where they already exist; however, a 
majority of the Team proposed that it would be appropriate for the Commission to re­
examine the question of a transfer to the general system following, the 1999 review. 
They considered that the formulation of the education and training provisions of the 
sectoral directives should be re-examined with a view to moving to competency based 
criteria which place more emphasis on the outcome of the education and training than 
on rigid rules governing contents. The Team also put forward options for reducing the 
administrative burden and costs of running the system, currently 1.5 Mecu annually, 
through a streamlining of the Advisory committees concerned. 
3.3.4. Commission Response - The Commission will come forward with proposals in 
1997 to streamline the working of the Advisory Committees and to simplify the updat­
ing of lists of diplomas eligible for automatic recognition. It intends to pursue the 
suggestion that a more output-oriented approach to the definition of education and 
training requirements should be introduced in the context of a review of the education 
and training requirements of the nurses' directive. It will also undertake an examination 
of the possible transfer of the professions concerned to the general system following 
the 1999 review. 
3.4. ORNAMENTAL PLANTS 
3.4.1. Background - The Community rules on the marketing of ornamental plant 
propagating material and ornamental plants are contained in Directive 91/682/EEC and 
implementing measures made thereunder. This Directive set out minimum quality 
standards and conditions at Community level with supporting accreditation procedures 
and documentary evidence. 
3.4.2. Problems - Due to its hurried adoption at the end of 1991, there are various 
inconsistencies in the text which have given rise to problems of interpretation for 
Member States when transposing and implementing the legislation. Furthermore, 
several Member States had asked the Commission to review the Directive in certain 
areas as its scope was not clear, nor the extent of some of the exemptions. In an 
attempt to overcome these problems, the Commission issued an Interpretative Note to 
Member States in 1994 on those provisions which had caused most difficulty. 
However, this was not sufficient to ensure rapid and uniform implementation by 
Member States. Finally, due to the difficulties outlined above, the Commission has not 
been able to develop further implementing measures required by the Directive. 
3.4.3. Key points from the SUM Team report - While some members of the SLIM 
Team - those who were commercial growers -severely doubted the need for Commu-
nity measures in this sector, there was general agreement that the Directive could be 
amended to clarify it and to lighten the administrative burden on both suppliers and 
Member State authorities. The Team recommended that the scope of application of the 
Directive - in terms of who should be regulated by it - should be clarified and that there 
should be differing forms and degrees of control at different stages of the produc­
tion/distribution process. The list of species covered should be determined by refer­
ence to their economic importance, with a possibility for Member States to be released 
from having to set up an infrastructure for species they do not normally produce or 
market. The rules regarding the denominations of varieties under which material is 
marketed should be redrafted and clarified and the implementing Directive 93/78/EEC 
should be abolished. Efforts should be made to ensure more coherence between the 
Ornamental Plants Directive and the Plant Health Directive, and the concept of 
equivalence as applied to third countries should be reviewed. 
3.4.4. Commission Response - The Commission will come forward with proposals by 
May 1997. These proposals will be based on a thorough examination of the different 
options put forward by the SUM Team. 
4. I The need for national initiatives on simplification and improvement 
The SLIM Teams in the pilot project found that, by and large, they were unable, in the 
time available, to focus on the needs for simplification at national level (although the 
national Intrastat systems had previously been evaluated on the basis of a detailed 
questionnaire). However, they were conscious of the importance of this dimension of 
the problem: the diplomas Team, for example, recommended that "the administrative 
and legal formalities with which some Member States surround the recognition proce­
dure should be further investigated with a view to their removal or simplification and 
clarification". This serves to underline the view that has frequently been expressed by 
representatives of business in the Community, that the burden of legislation is felt to be 
greater at the national rather than at the Community level. While the Commission 
continues to strive for simpler Community legislation, action is needed in the Member 
States too. In keeping with the Council resolution of 8 July on legislative and adminis­
trative in the internal market, the Commission will be promoting exchanges of views 
within the Internal Market Advisory Committee on such national actions. 
.' -8-
ANNEX 1A - INTRASTAT -
Summary of SLIM Team recommendations 
REDUCED OR SIMPLIFIED DATA REQUIREMENTS 
The removal of the requirement to report certain information, such as net mass for 
selected products, mode of transport and certain data which at present is collected at the 
option of the Member States (e.g., port of loading/unloading, region of origin and destina­
tion etc); a change to more business-friendly ways of declaring some information; 
and an extension of the deadline for the INTRASTAT declaration. 
NOMENCLATURE 
Introducing the idea of Harmonized System-6+ as commodity nomenclature in Intrastat the 
SLIM team emphasises the need for a substantial reduction in the present commodity 
nomenclature allowing a limited number of subheadings to be introduced to cover specific 
user needs. This will bring the number of subheadings down from the present 10.500 
to approximately 6.500 - 7000. The selection of these additional subheadings should be 
the responsibility of a joint committee with representatives of sectoral federations, Member 
States and Commission services. The use of HS6+ will be optional to the declarants, who 
may continue to use the CN. The detailed results on intra-Community trade will, however, 
only be made available according to HS6+. The HS6+ nomenclature would also allow 
comparisons to be made with the extra trade statistics and will cover international trade 
statistics recommendations. The SLIM Team also recommends reducing the number of 
updates to ensure stability. 
COLLECTION SYSTEM FRAMEWORKS 
The SLIM Team did not see much advantage in introducing sector or branch defined 
thresholds, and pointed out that a single EU threshold would cause problems because of 
the different economic conditions and business structures in Member States. Some refine­
ment might be envisaged, however, for example, by allowing firms just over the threshold 
to report less frequently. 
A two-tier system could be envisaged under which only aggregated data needed for bal­
ance of payments and key indicators on trade balance would be collected on a monthly 
basis, while more detailed data would be collected only quarterly or even less frequently. 
The SLIM Team recommends studying the implications of such a system for alleviating 
burdens on firms and its technical feasibility. 
Sampling could be used as a basis for collecting aggregated trade figures and could be 
used in conjunction with the other frameworks described. 
A one flow system, based only on export data, could reduce the number of firms having to 
report from the present 430.000 to between 200.000 and 300.000. This radical solution 
would result in a significant reduction in burdens while making it possible to retain the pre­
sent data elements, an advantage for users of the statistics. The one flow system could be 
combined e.g., with the two-tier system, and limited to the detailed figures, the aggregated 
figures still being collected in a two-flow environment. It could be envisaged, if confirmed 
by studies, that EU legislation should be adapted to offer the possibility of such a system 
being applied by only a group of Member States. 
SUPPORT MEASURES 
The increased use of electronic declarations systems should be actively promoted 
(adoption of the proposal to continue the EDICOM proposal would be a major contribution). 
Administration should provide as much help and guidance as possible for declarants. 
Statistical information based on their declarations should be returned to declarants to 
strengthen their interest in the exercise and improve the motivation of enterprises regarding 
compliance with statistical requirements. 
-9 
ANNEX 1B - CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS -
Summary of SLIM Team recommendations 
IMPROVEMENT OF WORKING PROCEDURES 
The improvements envisaged include the simplification of standardisation mandates 
issued by the Commission to the standardisation bodies. One solution could consist in 
structuring the mandates in such a way that detailed technical elements which are at the 
moment contained in some mandates could be provided by standardisation experts. Such 
simplification is only possible if the capacity of CEN to coordinate its work and technical 
issues is reinforced. Acceleration of procedures for producing mandates and stan­
dards would result from the simplification of mandates, by making for quicker consultation 
of the relevant Committees. High priority should also be given to the completion of Euro­
pean test method standards. The interim publication for information of European stan­
dards on test methods adopted and part of future Harmonised Standards on the one hand 
gives greater visibility of progress made in European standardisation and, on the other 
hand, gives industry the possibility to start to use the results of the efforts they have made 
in participating in the work of standardisation. 
ALIGNMENT OF THE CPD WITH THE CRITERIA OF "NEW APPROACH" DIRECTIVES 
To achieve this objective the Directive would need two specific modifications in its main 
requirements: one changing the status of Technical Specifications, which would lose 
their role as the unique means of fixing the CE marking and another giving the Interpre­
tative Documents, and possibly other technical elements retained in mandate which cover 
some characteristics given in standardisation mandates, the equivalent status of essen­
tial requirements. Under this option, industry would have the possibility of putting their 
products on the market with the CE marking, declaring conformity to standards or to parts 
of standards already published and, for characteristics not yet covered by standardisation, 
directly to the essential requirements. 
This option would entail the eventual necessity to add new elements with regard to some 
aspects of the Interpretative Documents: a global decision on attestation of conformity 
covering the intended use of all the 40 families of products covered by the CPD and adop­
tion and publication as Harmonised Standards of the parts of standards requested by 
mandates available from CEN. Such publication permits manufacture tc make use of CE 
marking, combining conformity to European standards and direct compliance with essential 
requirements for characteristics not yet covered by standards. 
Finally, the adoption of this option would allow, at the same time, a re-examination of the 
field of application of the CPD, to see whether it was possible to exclude certain products 
already mainly covered by other Directives 
AN OPTION IN TWO STAGES 
Through the development of Eurocodes and common regulations on fire issues, there is a 
good chance that in the future the legal framework for construction works could, to a 
certain extent, be harmonised for Member States. This would rely on the possibility of 
transforming the Eurocodes which are experimental standards (ENV) into European stan­
dards (EN). It also relies on the possibility of using, in practice, the Eurocodes as they are 
now, for construction works and civil engineering works. The adoption of the European 
systems of classification of products vis-à-vis the risks of reaction to fire and resistance to 
fire could also serve as the basis for common rules for buildings and support for common 
standards for products. However, these developments will both need time and the elabora­
tion of test standards to support them. There is, therefore, the possibility that the basic 
rules for buildings could have a common basis between Member, which could permit the 
two-stage option described at the third bullet point in para. 3.2.3. 
-10 
ANNEX 1C - RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS -
Summary of SLIM Team recommendations 
GENERAL 
The sectoral directives examined by the Team should be retained but the operation of 
the Advisory Committees linked to the Directives should be improved and simplified. 
RECOGNITION ISSUES 
The sectoral directives offer greater legal security to migrants than the general system and 
are easier for Member State administrations to operate. However, the general system, 
although implying more work for national administrations on individual cases, operates 
effectively once administrations have built up some experience in dealing with requests for 
recognition. A majority of the Team considered that the Commission should re-examine 
the question of a transfer of the professions into the general system following the 
review in 1999 of Directive 92/51. 
The team emphasised its concern that the simple procedures for recognition provided for in 
the sectoral directives are frequently complicated by additional administrative and legal 
requirements at national level, which are time-consuming, expensive and confusing for the 
migrant. These should be reviewed with a view to their removal or simplification and clarifi­
cation. 
EDUCATION AND TRAINING 
While the directives have made a positive contribution to education and training, the 
approach of setting out minimum requirements in the form of detailed lists of subjects was 
considered outdated by some members of the Team. The Team considered that the formu­
lation of the education and training provisions of the sectoral directives should be re-exam­
ined with a view to moving to competency based criteria which place more emphasis on 
the outcome of the education and training than on rigid rules governing contents. 
THE WORKING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEES 
The method of appointing Advisory Committees should be simplified: instead of the 
appointments being made by the Council, they should be made by each Member State 
notifying their choice to the Commission. The current three year term of office should 
be extended to improve continuity. The composition of the Advisory Committees (45 
members at present, which could become 75 after the next accession) should be re-exam­
ined. Finally, the Team puts forwards suggestions for,improving the working methods of 
the Committees. 
-11 
ANNEX 1D - ORNAMENTAL PLANTS -
Summary of SLIM Team recommendations 
THE NEED FOR THE DIRECTIVE 
The views of the Team were sharply divided on the need for the directive. Some Mem­
bers of the Team felt that there was a need for the directive to secure free movement and 
ensure minimum quality standards throughout the Union. Others felt strongly that market 
forces and general consumer protection or private contract law were sufficient. At most 
these Members would favour an optional regime which would give producers choosing to 
subject themselves to it the right to use an EC quality label on their material. However, 
there was general agreement that, assuming retention of the Directive, the administrative 
burden should be reduced on the lines indicated below. 
WHO SHOULD BE CONTROLLED BY THE LEGISLATION? 
There should be differing forms and degrees of control at different stages of the pro­
duction/distribution process, depending on the likely potential of the supplier to influence 
the quality of the material. If this approach were followed, the definition of "supplier" would 
have to be amended. 
LIST OF SPECIES 
The list of species should be determined by reference to their economic importance 
with the possibility for Member States to be released by way of a Community procedure 
from setting up a control infrastructure for species not normally produced on their territory. 
For seeds, the schedule under Article 4 of the directive should be reconsidered to take 
account of the declaration in the Council minutes at the time of its adoption that seeds 
would only be included if there was a meaningful connection between their quality 
and that of the other propagating materials deriving from them. 
VARIETAL AUTHENTICITY 
Article 9 of Directive 91/682/EEC envisaged material being marketed with a reference to 
either the variety or group of plants to which it belonged. The team was divided as to 
whether Article 9 should be retained. Some were strongly in favour of keeping Article 9 
(redrafted to be made more clear) and regarded it as essential in order to protect the con­
sumer and to be used as a basis for labelling. Others were not in favour of retaining it but 
felt that if it were kept it should be simplified only to oblige the supplier to provide varieties 
which were true to name and true to type. So far as Directive 93/78/EEC (the implementing 
measure under Article 9) was concerned, there was a clear majority in favour of repealing it 
altogether. It was too prescriptive and the reference in Article 9 to "accepted internationai 
guidelines" was regarded as sufficient. 
INTERRELATIONSHIP WITH DIRECTIVE 77/93/EEC (PLANT HEALTH) 
Although there was no incompatibility between similar provisions in both directives and. 
indeed, considerable similarity, further efforts should be made to ensure coincidence 
whilst recognising that the aims of the two directives were different. 
THIRD COUNTRY EQUIVALENCE 
The provisions of the directive on the concept of equivalence as applied to third country 
imports should be reviewed. 
Financial Statement 
1. TITLE OF OPERATION 
Simpler Legislation for the Internal Market (SLIM) Pilot Project (implemented by the 
establishment of working groups known as "SLIM Teams"). 
2. BUDGET HEADING CONCERNED 
A 250: Meetings and convocations 
3. IEQAI BASIS 
Articles 3c, 7A, 100A of the Treaty 
4. DESCRIPTION OF THE OPERATION 
4.1. Objectives 
The Pilot Project carried out from June to November 1996, resulted in concrete sug­
gestions about ways in which legislation in four areas could be simplified. These are 
INTRASTAT, construction products, mutual recognition of diplomas, and ornamental 
plants. It is now proposed to continue the exercise in further sectors. The purpose of 
this simplification is to improve the competitiveness of business and its employment-
creating potential by ensuring that over-complicated regulation at Community or 
national level does not impede its effective participation in the Single Market. 
4.2. Duration 
The next phase will be carried out in 1997, with the possibility of further phases in later 
years. 
5. CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURE/REVENUE 
5.1. Non-compulsory expenditure 
5.2. Differentiated appropriations 
5.3. Nature of revenues: Not applicable 
6. NATURE EXPENDITURE/REVENUE 
6.1. Nature of expenditure 
Meeting expenses for the +/- 40 members of the SLIM teams (10 per team): 6 one-day 
meetings per team in Brussels. 
6.2. Revenues 
The pilot project is financed 100% by the Community budget. 
7. FINANCIAL IMPACT ON THE OPERATIONAL APPROPRIATIONS 
None. 
Al 
-2-
8. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES 
Not applicable (apart from the verification of the expenses claimed for attendance at 
meetings). 
9. ELEMENTS OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS 
9.1. Specific quantifiable objectives, target population 
• The pilot project aimed at making concrete suggestions about ways in which 
legislation in four areas could be simplified. The recommendations for sim­
plification made by the SLIM Teams leads to a positive evaluation of the 
pilot project at this stage. Future SLIM reports will cover not only the sectors 
included in each successive phase but will evaluate progress in simplifying 
legislation which has been the subject of earlier exercises. 
• Target population - The pilot project is targeted on the needs of businesses 
and professional people throughout the Community for clear, simple and 
proportionate regulation that allows them to exercise their Single Market 
rights without unnecessary restrictions or excessive expense. Small and 
medium-sized enterprises are particularly affected by compliance costs. 
9.2. Grounds for the operation 
9.2.1. Need for the budgetary intervention of the Community 
• SLIM is designed to improve the operation of the single market by simplify­
ing and improving some of the rules which govern it. The economic benefits 
to be expected from such simplification more than justify the intervention 
proposed. 
• This action is to be seen in the light of the Commission's other activities with 
regard to the simplification and codification of legislation (see the report to 
the European Council of December 1995, "Better Law-Making"). 
9.2.2. Choice of the method of intervention 
• The choice of the "SLIM team" approach, which brings together the Com­
mission, a small number of Member States and representatives of those 
affected by the legislation in small working groups is dictated by the need to 
bring together the different perspectives of those involved with enforcing the 
legislation and those affected by it. The teams are deliberately small in order 
to facilitate a genuine exchange of views which may be more difficult in 
larger and more formal groups to facilitate rapid progress. 
9.2.3. Main factors of uncertainty which could affect the specific results of the opera­
tion 
• The size of the groups, the choice of members, the sectors chosen and the 
deadline imposed are all factors that may influence the outcome. 
9.3. Monitoring and evaluation of the operation 
9.3.1 Performance indicators 
• See 9.3.2. 
9.3.2. Methods and frequency of the evaluation foreseen 
• For the pilot project, progress was reported periodically to a Group of 
Commissioners and the Commission may decide to continue this arrange­
ment. 
à -
• Progress will also be reported to the Internal Market Advisory Committee 
and to the sectoral committees concerned. 
• Within the Commission, the services responsible for the different SLIM 
teams and other interested services concerned will meet to review progress 
and compare experiences in the operation of the exercise. 
• Reports will be submitted to the Internal Market Council and the European 
Council will also be informed of the results obtained. 
9.3.3. Assessment of the results obtained 
• The results obtained are the subject of reports to the Council, as mentioned 
above. The key element in the evaluation of the exercise is the degree to 
which it is possible to arrive at concrete recommendations and subsequent 
action on simplification by the Community institutions on the basis of these 
recommendations. 
9.4. Coherence with financial programming 
SLIM has not been specifically included in the Draft Budget for 1997 as it was not 
possible to pre-judge the results of the pilot project. It has proved possible in the case 
of the pilot project to finance the exercise from the envelope provided for the sectors in 
question. A specific provision for SLIM will be proposed for 1998. 
10. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE (SECTION III. PART A OF THE BUDGET) 
The provision of the required administrative resources is dependant upon the annual 
decision of the Commission concerning the allocation of resources, taking particular 
account of the extra personnel and financial resources made available by the budget 
authority. 
10.1. Effect on the number of posts 
Type of post 
Officials or tem­
porary staff A 
B 
C 
Other resources 
Total Staff to be assigned to 
managing the operation 
Permanent 
posts 
1 
1 Temporary 
posts Source 
Existing resources in 
the DG or depart­
ment concerned 
1 
1 Additional 
resources Duration 
1997 
10.2. Overall financial impact of additional human resources 
Amounts Method of calculation 
(ecus) 
Officials 
Temporary staff 
Other resources (indicate budget heading) 
Total | | 
The expenses related to human resources required for the completion of this action will 
be made available upon mobilisation of existing resources: 
Officials (titles A1, A2, A4, A5): 100.000 ecus 
4-
10.3. Increase in other administrative expenditure as a result of the operaf:on 
Budget heading Amounts Method of calculation 
(ecus) 
Total I | 
The number of SLIM Teams in any given year will depend on future decisions of the 
Commission. The following calculations assume 4 Teams per year. 
The total expenses for 4 SLIM teams come to 180.000 ecus. 
All expenses relate to A 250 - Meetings and convocations and will be met by the mobi­
lisation of existing resources. They will be shared by the responsible services, each 
service covering the expenses of the SLIM Team for its area of responsibility. 
The annual cost may be estimated as follows: 
4 SLIM Teams x 6 one-day meetings = 24 meetings 
• 24 x 5 government experts = 24x5x695 ecus (average cost) = 83,400 ecus 
• 24 x 5 private experts = 24x5x804 ecus (average cost) = 96,480 ecus 
TOTAL: 179,880 ecus, 
say 180,000 ecus 

ISSN02S4-I47> 
COM(96) 559 final 
DOCUMENTS 
EN 06 10 01 
Catalogue number : CB-CO-96-568-EN-C 
ISBN 92-78-11413-8 
Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 
L-2985 Luxembourg