RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
with comments forming an integral part of the decision on the discharge for the implementation
of the budget of the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial year 2004
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
— having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial
year 2004 (1),
— having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the European Maritime Safety
Agency for the financial year 2004, together with the Agency's replies (2),
— having regard to the Council's recommendation of 14 March 2006 (5972/2006 — C6-0093/2006),— having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,
— having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial
Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (
3), and in particular
Article 185 thereof,
— having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (4), and in particular Article 19 thereof,
— having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the
framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC,Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European
Communities (
5), and in particular Article 94 thereof,
— having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee
on Transport and Tourism (A6-0103/2006),
A. whereas the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual
accounts for the financial year ended 31 December 2004 were reliable and that the underlyingtransactions, taken as a whole, were legal and regular,
B. whereas the Court of Auditors states that it has obtained reasonable assurance from all the agencies,
excepting the express reservations in respect of the 2004 financial year concerning the EuropeanAgency for Reconstruction, the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, theEuropean Training Foundation, the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia andthe European Food Safety Authority,
1. Recalls that, under Article 185 of the Financial Regulation, Parliament shall give discharge for the
implementation of the budgets of the bodies set up by the Communities and having legal personalitywhich actually receive grants charged to the budget; points out, however, that not all of these bodies
are fully, or even partially, funded via grants charged to the budget; emphasises that the discharge
decision therefore covers both the budget and the non-budget funding of these bodies; considers itunacceptable that some of the bodies set up by the Union are accountable for the expenditure ofincome received from sources other than the budget whilst others, which do not receive a subsidyfrom the budget, are not; affirms the principle that all Community agencies, whether or not they are
subsidised, are subject to discharge by Parliament, even when another discharge authority intervenes
in accordance with their basic texts; takes the view that there is a need to review all texts that goagainst this principle;6.12.2006 L 340/126 Official Journal of the European Union EN
(1) OJ C 269, 28.10.2005, p. 9.
(2) OJ C 332, 28.12.2005, p. 30.
(3) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.
(4) OJ L 208, 5.8.2002, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 724/2004 (OJ L 129, 29.4.2004, p. 1).
(5) OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1261/2005 (OJ L 201,
2.8.2005, p. 3).
2. Finds table 1 of the Court of Auditors' report, introduced for the first time during the 2003
discharge exercise, which summarises the Agency's powers and responsibilities, governance,resources, activities and services provided, of great value; notes that the information contained intable 1 is supplied by the Agency; asks the Court of Auditors to verify the contents of table 1;
3. Insists that as well as spending money properly, agencies should also strive to spend money as effi-
ciently and effectively as possible; invites the Court of Auditors to consider the possibility ofextending its specific annual reports on the agencies to include an examination of performance andachievement of objectives; in this context and in line with its resolutions on the 2003 discharge,insists that the following aspects be taken into account: that duplication of work among the agencies
must be avoided as much as possible and that measures designed to improve transparency and
communication with the public must be clarified, along with Community affirmative actionmeasures at all levels of recruitment, training and the assignment of responsibilities;
4. Notes that Community agencies do not always have a good image or good press and that many of
them do not deserve such a negative image; points out that EU citizens should be made aware of
this, with appropriate means being used to explain as often as is necessary the raisons d'être andachievements of the agencies; calls on the Commission to act accordingly, using whatever means itconsiders necessary;
5. Notes that the enlargement of the European Union in 2004 has affected the structures and operating
arrangements of the Community agencies in many ways, and that several of the agencies draw atten-
tion to these effects in their activity reports, focusing in particular on the increase in the number ofadministrators; calls on the Commission to assess the real or supposed problems encountered and torecommend the regulatory changes required;
6. Notes that the Commission has made a commitment to harmonising the way in which activity
reports concerning its directorates-general are presented; calls for a similar approach to be taken inrespect of the activity reports of the Communities' agencies, which differ significantly in terms ofcontent; calls on the Commission to point out to the Communities' agencies the information andactivity indicators that they must provide;
7. Welcomes the fact that the Court of Auditors found the Agency's accounts for 2004 to be reliable
and the underlying transactions, taken as a whole, to be legal and regular;
8. Stress that the Agency must make a clear distinction between commitment and payment appropria-
tions in its budget; is pleased to note that the Agency is in contact with the Commission with a
view to drawing up appropriate presentation models for its budget data, and expects future budgetsto be presented in the appropriate form;
9. Notes the low level of implementation of the 2004 budget and the high level of carry-overs; notes
the Agency's explanation that this was due to late launching of calls for tender due to a lack of
operational managerial staff; hopes that staffing problems have been resolved;
10. Notes the Court of Auditors' finding of a number of failures in the internal control system; is
pleased to note the steps taken by the Agency to strengthen its internal control system and to avoidsuch problems in the future;
11. Regrets the little use made of appropriations for maritime anti-pollution measures, namely that only
EUR 200 000 of the EUR 700 000 available in both commitment and payment appropriations wasused, representing a rate of 28 %; recalls that anti-pollution measures are a key aspect of the Agen-cy's activities and insists that funds made available be effectively deployed in the future;
12. Notes that the Community subsidy for the Agency rose from EUR 2 630 000 in 2003 to EUR
12 800 000 in 2004 and that in 2004 the Agency implemented less then 60 % of such subsidy inexpenditure;
13. Calls on the Commission to help the agencies follow as closely as possible the work plan agreed for
the year ahead, allowing activities to be properly planned and implemented, and particularly toavoid major, last-minute changes to the work load;
14. Asks the Commission to improve synergies between agencies by making cooperation more effective,
avoiding duplication of work and addressing shortcomings, in particular as regards common areas
such as training, the implementation of Community policies across the board, the use of the latest
management systems and solving problems relating to sound management of the budget.6.12.2006 L 340/127 Official Journal of the European Union EN