P6_TA(2006)0136
Situation with refugee camps in Malta
European Parliament resolution on the situation with refugee camps in Malta
The European Parliament ,
— having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in particular Article 14 thereof,
— having regard to the Geneva Convention of 1951 on the status of refugees, in particular Article 31
thereof,
— having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Free-
doms, in particular Article 5 thereof,
— having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (1), in particular Articles 1
and 18 thereof,
— having regard to Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for
the reception of asylum seekers (2) and Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum
standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees oras persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (
3),
— having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria
and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application
lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national (4), which is known as Dublin II,
— having regard to Article 6 of the EU Treaty and Article 63 of the EC Treaty,
— having regard to Rule 103(4) of its Rules of Procedure,
A. whereas visits by delegations from its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs to deten-
tion centres in the EU, most recently in Malta, have shown that asylum seekers are detained in con-ditions that fall far below internationally recognised standards, and where particular concerns includephysical conditions, as well as inadequate or non-existent access to basic services, such as medical careor social and legal assistance,
B. whereas a delegation from its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs went to Malta on
24 March 2006 in order to visit administrative detention centres, in particular the centres of Ħal Safi,
Ħal Far and Lyster Barracks, and to meet the Maltese authorities and the NGOs dealing with immi-
gration,
C. having regard to the facts ascertained on the spot by the delegation members,
D. whereas asylum seekers in Malta are held in administrative detention centres,E. whereas the island of Malta is situated on the southern border of the European Union, it is a small
island covering 316 km
2and has a population of 400 000, with a population density of 1 200 people/
km2, and it obviously has a very limited capacity for receiving and accommodating migrants and
asylum seekers, who regularly arrive on its shores in great numbers,
F. whereas the average number of people arriving in Malta each year is equivalent to 45 % of the birth rate
in Malta and, in relative terms, one arrival in Malta corresponds to 140 in Italy, 150 in France and 205in Germany; whereas in 2005, 1800 people arrived in Malta, which is equivalent to 252 000 in Italy,270 000 in France and 369 000 in Germany,
(1) OJ C 364, 18.12.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 31, 6.2.2003, p. 18.
(3) OJ L 304, 30.9.2004, p. 12.
(4) OJ L 50, 25.2.2003, p. 1.2.12.2006 EN C 293 E/301 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 6 April 2006
G. whereas Malta spends 1 % of its national budget on tackling the current situation, which is bound to
worsen in the coming months and years; whereas Malta deploys a considerable proportion of its armyand police force —more than 10 % of the personnel —to deal with the humanitarian emergency and
manage the detention and reception centres,
H. whereas Malta is not the final destination of the people arriving on the island, who state that they want
to enter other Member States,
I. whereas the Maltese authorities do not have sufficient staff to deal with asylum applications in a rea-
sonable period of time,
J. whereas some of the people arriving in Malta come from war-stricken countries, in particular in the
Horn of Africa and Darfur, and it would be difficult to return them to their countries of origin,
K. whereas living in ‘open accommodation ’is always preferable to staying in actual detention centres, as
experience in Ceuta and Melilla has shown,
L. whereas Malta's administrative practice sets eighteen months as the maximum period for holding
migrants and twelve months for asylum seekers awaiting a decision on their applications,
M. whereas the Maltese population looks to the European Union for an expression of solidarity and sup-
port, which, to date, has not been forthcoming,
N. whereas the European Union should intervene as a matter of urgency and make every endeavour to
support Malta in its effort to manage migratory flows, which the Maltese authorities would also like to
see,
O. whereas the European Union should do everything possible to help Malta and the other countries on
the borders of the EU experiencing similar difficulties,
P. whereas accession to the European Union has meant, for Malta and other small countries, difficulties in
applying Regulation (EC) No 343/2003,
1. Firmly believes that Malta and other Member States must respect their obligations under international
law as regards asylum seekers;
2. Recognises the difficulties encountered by Malta in managing the migration emergency of the last few
years;
3. Expresses its solidarity with the Maltese population, the asylum seekers and immigrants held in deten-
tion, the Maltese authorities and the police and armed forces, who are confronted with a considerableproblem, in view of the size of Malta and its population and the fact that Malta is not the final destinationof migrants and asylum seekers;
4. Commends the transparency of the Maltese authorities, who allowed the delegation from its Commit-
tee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the press free access to Malta's administrative detentioncentres;
5. Deplores, nevertheless, the unacceptable living conditions of the migrants and asylum seekers in Mal-
ta's administrative detention centres;
6. Calls on the Maltese authorities to reduce substantially the length of time migrants are held;
7. Calls for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and NGOs to be given total access to the closed
holding centres; calls on the competent NGOs to ensure a permanent presence in these centres in order toensure access to medical and legal assistance;C 293 E/302 EN 2.12.2006 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 6 April 2006
8. Insists that the Member States establish access to the asylum application procedure and apply the
provisions of Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on proceduresin Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status (
1) in a consistent and rigorous manner and
ensure that asylum applications are processed swiftly and efficiently;
9. Calls on the Maltese authorities to apply Directive 2003/9/EC, especially as regards conditions in the
detention centres;
10. Calls for a greater role for the European Union in the management of humanitarian emergencies
linked to migratory flows and asylum seekers;
11. Calls on the Council to hold an extraordinary meeting of Justice and Home Affairs Ministers in Malta
as soon as possible to take account of the need to take urgent and immediate measures to address theanticipated upsurge in numbers of irregular migrants arriving in Malta over the summer months, whilst atthe same time finding a suitable solution to the current difficulties;
12. Considers that the Member States should show greater solidarity towards the Member States that
suffer most from the EU-bound migratory flows and calls on the Member States to receive on their territoryasylum seekers from Malta and other small countries, using technical assistance and the funding provided
under the ARGO programme, the European Refugee Fund, the European External Borders Fund, the Euro-
pean Integration Fund and the European Return Fund for the period 2007-2013;
13. Calls on the Council and the Member States to supply practical aid for Malta:
— by sending groups of experts, including independent experts, to provide assistance in granting asylum-
seeker status, and
— by sending groups of experts, including independent experts, to provide advice on compliance with
Directive 2003/9/EC;
14. Calls on the Commission to propose, as soon as possible, the creation of an emergency fund to
tackle humanitarian crises in the Member States and to incorporate in the new funds for the period 2007-2013 an emergency mechanism allowing financial assistance to be provided in emergency situations;
15. Urges the Commission to take the initiative as soon as possible with a view to revising Regulation
(EC) No 343/2003, ‘Dublin II ’, by calling into question its very principle, namely that the Member State
responsible for dealing with an asylum application is the first country that applicants reach, which puts anintolerable burden on the countries situated in the south and east of the EU, and by introducing a fairmechanism for sharing responsibilities among the Member States;
16. Reiterates the need for a Community immigration and asylum policy based on the opening-up of
legal immigration channels and on the definition of common standards for the protection of the fundamen-tal rights of immigrants and asylum seekers throughout the Union, as established by the Tampere EuropeanCouncil in 1999 and confirmed by the Hague programme;
17. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments
and parliaments of the Member States and to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner forRefugees.
(1) OJ L 326, 13.12.2005, p. 13.2.12.2006 EN C 293 E/303 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 6 April 2006