RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT  
of 10 May 2011  
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the 
implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2009  
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,  
— having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 
2009,  
— having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Food Safety 
Authority for the financial year 2009, together with the Authority’s replies (  1 ), 
— having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 15 February 2011 (05892/2011 — C7-0052/2011),  
— having regard to Article 276 of the EC Treaty and Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the 
European Union,  
— having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial 
Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (  2 ), and in particular 
Article 185 thereof,  
— having regard to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council (  3 ) 
establishing a European Food Safety Authority, and in particular Article 44 thereof,  
— having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the 
framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation 
(EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the 
European Communities (  4 ), and in particular Article 94 thereof,  
— having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,  
— having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee 
on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0146/2011),  
A. whereas the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts 
for the financial year 2009 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular,  
B. whereas on 5 May 2010 Parliament granted the Executive Director of the European Food Safety 
Authority discharge for implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2008 (  5 ), and 
in its resolution accompanying the discharge decision, inter alia:  
— observed that for the third successive year the Court of Auditors has flagged up carry-overs of 
appropriations to the following year (23 % of the 2008 budget was carried over to 2009, 16 % 
of the 2007 budget was carried over to 2008, 20 % of the 2006 budget was carried over to 2007),  
— noted that 20 out of the 25 recommendations (80 %) made by the Internal Audit Service (IAS) and 
the Internal Audit Capability (IAC) have been implemented,  
— noted that the second staff survey was launched in October 2008 with a view to assessing the 
Authority’s working environment,EN 27.9.2011 Official Journal of the European Union L 250/163  
( 1 ) OJ C 338, 14.12.2010, p. 108.  
( 2 ) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.  
( 3 ) OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1.  
( 4 ) OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.  
( 5 ) OJ L 252, 25.9.2010, p. 155.
C. whereas the budget of the Authority for 2009 was EUR 71 400 000, which is an increase of 7,5 % on 
the financial year 2008,  
Performance  
1. Takes note that the Authority’s 2009 budget amounted to EUR 71 400 000 compared to 
EUR 66 400 000 in the previous year;  
2. Underlines that, in the course of the budgetary procedure 2009, an overall reserve of EUR 4 546 000 
was introduced by the budgetary authority to the Authority’s budget; welcomes the fact that 
EUR 2 000 000 of the reserve was released in November 2009 to implement the IT development 
and infrastructure projects of the Authority, as it provided the respective committee with the results 
of the staff opinion survey, which was the condition for lifting the reserve;  
3. Notes, further, that the other part of the reserve has been allocated to the same policy area in order to 
contribute to effective response measures against the H1N1 pandemic; is aware that the Authority has 
not requested these funds for recruitment procedures as they were postponed to 2010;  
4. Congratulates the Authority for having set out, in the table annexed to the Court of Auditors’ 2009 
report, a comparison of the operations that were carried out during 2008 and 2009 so as to enable the 
discharge authority to assess more effectively its performance from one year to the next; welcomes the 
fact that the Authority has increased its number of thematic papers and policy briefings;  
5. Observes that the Authority introduced differentiated appropriations for science grants and scientific 
cooperation projects in 2009 which led to the cancellation of EUR 6 000 000 in payment appro ­
priations; advises the Authority to strengthen the planning and monitoring of budget processes 
related to differentiated appropriations;  
6. Underlines the need for the Authority to ensure its advice is of a high quality and is independent, in 
order to guarantee compliance with Union safety standards, scientific excellence and independence on 
all matters with a direct or indirect impact on food and feed safety, and plant protection; recommends, 
particularly in the interests of transparency, measures to further foster and monitor internal rules on 
declarations of interest of staff of the Authority and of experts working for the Authority;  
7. Requests that the Court of Auditors undertake performance audits on the Authority;  
Budgetary and financial management  
8. Calls on the Authority to strengthen the budget processes related to its differentiated appropriations 
and the planning and monitoring of its multiannual implementation; notes, in fact, that the Court of 
Auditors reported that EUR 6 000 000 (75 %) of the differentiated appropriations for science grants and 
scientific cooperation projects had to be cancelled, of which EUR 3 100 000 were funds allocated in 
excess of the needs identified by the Authority; welcomes, nevertheless, the Authority’s intention to take 
measures based on its experience for the year 2009, the first year in which the concept of differentiated 
appropriations for scientific cooperation projects was introduced;  
9. Urges, in addition, the Authority to improve its budget management in order to reduce its high carry- 
over amounts; stresses, in fact, that for the fourth successive year the Court of Auditors has flagged up 
carry-overs of appropriations to the following year (13 % of the 2009 budget was carried over to 2010, 
23 % of the 2008 budget was carried over to 2009, 16 % of the 2007 budget was carried over to 2008 
and 20 % of the 2006 budget was carried over to 2007); notes, in particular, that this situation 
demonstrates weaknesses in the Authority’s contract management and monitoring of the remittance 
of reports and cost statements;  
10. Regrets that, for the third successive year, the Court of Auditors pointed out that commitments for 
operational activities carried over from the previous year had to be cancelled (19 % of commitments for 
operational activities carried over from 2008, 37 % of commitments for operational activities carried 
over from 2007 and 26 % of commitments for operational activities carried over from 2006); urges the 
Authority to change this situation and to notify the Court of Auditors of the measures taken;EN L 250/164 Official Journal of the European Union 27.9.2011
11. Notes, in addition, that the Court of Auditors reported difficulties in the implementation of the 2009 
work programme; calls, accordingly, on the Authority to take the necessary measures to remedy these 
deficiencies;  
Internal audit  
12. Acknowledges that the Authority has sent to the authority responsible for discharge a report drawn up 
by its Executive Director summarising the content of the IAS recommendation as provided for in 
Article 72(5) of the framework Financial Regulation; nevertheless is concerned, in particular, that out of 
the 48 recommendations, one is considered ‘critical’ (on grant management), 27 ‘very important’ and 
20 ‘important’ but no information has been given to the discharge authority on the content of these 
recommendations; urges, accordingly, the Executive Director of the Authority to provide this 
information;  
13. Acknowledges from the Authority that the IAS conducted an in-depth audit risk assessment in the last 
quarter of 2009 to determine the audit priorities and the IAS audit plan for the next 3 years, an audit 
on declarations of interest and an audit on recruitment in 2009;  
14. Considers that the audit committee, created by the Authority in 2006, plays an important role in 
assisting the Management Board by ensuring that the work of the IAS and the IAC is properly carried 
out and duly taken into consideration by the Management Board and the Executive Director; believes, 
therefore, that this audit committee within the Authority might serve as an example to other agencies;  
15. Reiterates its demand on the Authority to take appropriate measures in case of conflicts of interest; 
invites the Authority to initiate a survey on potential conflicts of interest of its leading scientists, board 
and panel members, so that possible omissions in the declarations of interest can be detected and 
followed by action in a timely manner;  
16. Refers, in respect of the other observations accompanying its Decision on discharge, which are of a 
horizontal nature, to its resolution of 10 May 2011 (  1 ) on the performance, financial management and 
control of the agencies.EN 27.9.2011 Official Journal of the European Union L 250/165  
( 1 ) Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0163 (See page 269 of this Official Journal).