ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES 
DE LA COMMISSION 
 
 
 
COLLECTION RELIEE DES 
DOCUMENTS "COM" 
 
 
 
 
COM (83) 484 
 
 
 
Vol. 1983/0 183 
  
 
Disclaimer  
Conformém ent au règlement (CEE, Euratom) n° 354/83 du Conseil du 1er février 1983 
concernant l'ouverture au public des archives historiques de la Communauté économique 
européenne et de la Communauté européenne de l'énergie atomique (JO L 43 du 15.2.1983, 
p. 1), tel que modifié par le règlement (CE, Euratom) n° 1700/2003 du 22 septembre 2003 
(JO L 243 du 27.9.2003, p. 1), ce dossier est ouvert au public. Le cas échéant, les documents 
classifiés présents dans ce dossier ont été déclassifiés conformément à l'article 5 dudit 
règlem ent. 
In accordance with Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 of 1 February 1983 
concerning the openi ng to the public of the historical archives of the European Econom ic 
Community and the European Atomic Energy Communit y (OJ L 43, 15.2.1983, p. 1), as 
amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1700/2003 of 22 September 2003 (OJ L 243, 
27.9.2003, p. 1), this f ile is open to the public. Where necessary, classified documents in this 
file have been declassified in conformity with Article 5 of the aforementioned regulation.  
In Übereinstimmung mit der Verordnung (EWG, Euratom) Nr. 354/83 des Rates vom  1. 
Februar 198 3 über die Freigabe der historischen Archive der Europäischen  
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und der Europäischen Atomgem einschaft (ABI. L 43 vom  15.2.1983,  
S. 1), geändert durch die Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 1700/2003 vom 22. Septem ber 2003  
(ABI. L 243 vom 27 .9.2003, S. 1), ist diese Datei der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit  
erforderlich, wurden die Verschlusssachen in dieser Datei in Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 5  
der genannten Verordnung freigegeben.  
COMMISSION  OF THE  EUROPEAN  COMMUNITIES 
COM (83)  484  final 
Brussels,  7 September  1983 
TENTH  REPORT  BY THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL 
on the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No  543/69 
of 25 March 1969 on the harmonization of certain social 
legislation relating to road transport 
(1 January to  31 December  1980) 
COM (83) 484  final 

- 2 -
CONTENTS 
Page 
Introduction 
PART  ONE '3 
Comparative  analysis  of information  supplied  by the  Member States 4 
I. Organization  of control 4 
1. Administrative organization  of inspection 4 
2. Authorized inspecting officers  and  their powers 5 
3. Methods  of inspection (place  and  frequency) 6 
II. Infringements  and  penalties 10 
1. Number  of infringements  of the  Regulation 10 
2. Infringements  by nationals  and  foreigners respectively  : 
comparative figures 12 
3. Penalties imposed 13 
III. Multilateral  mutual assistance between Member States  and 
notification  of infringements 15 
IV. Suggestions  and  comments  by the  Member States 16 
V. Comments  by the  Commission  on the  information supplied  by the 
Member States 18 
1. Member States' contributions  to the  annual report 18 
2. Number  and  powers  of the  inspectors 18 
3. Inspection methods 18 
4. Infringements  by nationals  and  foreigners 19 
5. Penalties 20 
6. Mutual assistance 21 
PART  TWO 
A. Conclusions  drawn  by the  Commission  from visits  to Member States 22 
I. Inspections 23 
II. Infringements 25 
III.Problems  concerning penalties 26 
IV. Problems concerning tachographs 29 
V. Ban  on certain types  of payment (Article  12(a)) 31 
B. Final  conclusions  by the  Commission 32 
ANNEXES 

- 3 -
INTRODUCTION 
Article  17 of Council Regulation (EEC) No  543/69  lays down  that 
"each  year the Commission shall present to the Council a general report on 
the implementation of this Regulation by Member States" and  that  "... Member 
States shall communicate to the Commission the necessary information using 
a standard form of report...". 
This  report covers 1980 and, as in the past, gives an overall view 
of the implementation of Regulations (EEC) Nos  543/69  and  1463/70  in nine of 
the Member States (Greece was not yet a member of the European Community in 
1980). 
In order to simplify matters, an  attempt  has been made to  limit 
the number of tables by grouping the information provided by the Member States 
wherever possible. However, greater emphasis has been placed on the views and 
comments  of the Commission  with  regard to the situation and its development. 
Nevertheless,  the document follows the structure of the standard 
form of report on the basis of which the Member States are required to submit 
their contributions. However, the Commission plans to examine  with  the Member 
States whether changes can be made to the standard form of report to achieve 
greater comparability of national data. 

- 4 -
PART  ONE 
COMPARATIVE  ANALYSIS  OF INFORMATION  SUPPLIED  BY THE  MEMBER  STATES 
I) ORGANIZATION OF  CONTROL 
1) Administrative organization of inspection 
The implementation of Regulations (EEC) Nos 543/69 and 1463/70 
is controlled by means of checks at the roadside and at operators' premises. 
a) at the roadside  : 
Under  national highway codes, the police have the power to stop 
and inspect vehicles at the roadside and,  within  the broader framework of 
normal roadside checks, can also check  that  social legislation is being 
properly observed. In some  cases,  these checks are carried out in collabora­
tion  with  national authorities  with  special responsibilities in the sector 
in question. 
b) at operators' premises 
This  type of inspection is generally the responsibility of officials 
of the factory inspectorate who carry out general checks in the broader area 
of the application of national labour laws. 
More  specifically, up to 1979 France had limited inspections to firms 
carrying out transport operations on behalf of others; in 1980, these checks 
were extended on a limited  trial  basis to firms carrying out transport opera­
tions on their own behalf; as the results were conclusive, it was decided to 
extend checks to the whole of the country  from  1 January 1981. 

- 5 -
2) Authorized inspecting  officers  and their powers 
The Commission  received figures  from only the following 
Member States : 
BELGIUM 199 inspectors  and assistant inspectors 
47 Transport Department  personnel 
(traffic examiners  and inspectors) 
DENMARK 300 police officers 
241 factory inspectors,  around 30 of whom 
deal specifically  with Regulation 
543/69 
GERMANY 2.500 (*) 
250+300C*) police, BAG, factory inspectors 
public services of the Factory 
Inspectorate 
NETHERLANDS 173 Officials of the Ministry of 
Transport and Water Control 
UNITED 
KINGDOM 217 traffic examiners 
FRANCE 320 traffic examiners  and deputy 
examiners 
49 factory inspectors 
(*) as part of wider powers. 

- 6 -
More specifically, the use of four semi-automatic disc reading 
machines in France (known as  SABINE)  enabled 327 150 tachograph discs to be 
analysed in 1980, compared  with  187 906 in 1979, i.e. an increase of 75 %. 
The powers of officials responsible for verifying the implementation of 
Regulation (EEC) No 543/69 vary  from  one State to another. In some Member 
States,  officials may give warnings, impose fines, draw up official reports 
or temporarily immobilize vehicles. 
In other States, however, those responsible for carrying out checks 
do not have powers to impose fines, or to immobilize the vehicle. 
3) Methods of inspection (place and frequency) 
a) Roadside checks : 
In some  cases,  roadside checks are carried out in the course of 
general  traffic  survei11 lance. 
These  checks are intensified through collaboration  with  other 
specialized  bodies, such as officials of the BAG and factory inspectors 
in the Federal Republic of Germany. Some "Lander" in the Federal Republic 
have drawn up census sheets for roadside and  frontier  checks: these sheets 
enable the data to be processed by computer. 
In the United Kingdom, each  traffic  examiner carries out two checks 
per week on average.  Checks  are carried out on 10-15% of vehicles entering the 
country through the ports. The United Kingdom authorities have also set up a 
system of "silent checks" carried out by  traffic  examiners, which consist of 
observing the movement of vehicles and checking these movements subsequently 
at the operator's premises. In 1980, around 80 000 such checks were carried 
out. 

- ( -
b) Checks at operators' premises : 
This  type of check is carried out as  part  of a wider monitoring 
procedure  going beyond the implementation of the Regulations to which this 
Report relates. The checks are normally carried out on a random sampling 
basis;  in special or exceptional  cases,  inspections are decided on as a result 
of roadside  checks,  a complaint or a piece of information. The periods for 
which the checks are carried out "a posteriori" vary greatly according to the 
case.  The Commission has no detailed information on the length of these periods. 
It must be concluded  that  the degree of intensity of this type of check varies 
greatly from one country to another. 
c) Quantitative analysis of checks : 
To assess  the  scope  of checks carried out in the Member States, 
an attempt  has been made to draw up a comparative  table  reflecting the 
situation on the basis of the information supplied. 

- 8 -
NUMBER  OF  CHECKS CARRIED  OUT IN 1980 (1 ) 
Member State Roadside Operators' premises Comparison between 
1979 and 1980 
BELGIUM 8.331 (2) 2.404 more checks 
in 1980 
DENMARK 12.327 421 more checks 
in 1980 
GERMANY 211.185 (3) 31.657 more checks 
in 1980 
FRANCE 639.846 41.645 more checks 
in 1980 
IRELAND no information no information -
ITALY idem idem 
LUXEMBOURG idem '": idem -
NETHERLANDS 200.000 485 in-depth checks more checks 
in 1980 
UNITED 
KINGDOM 80.000 (4) no information fewer checks 
in 1980 
(1) To judge the extent to which checks are comparable, cf. annexes 1, 2 and 3. 
(2) This figure includes 8 100 checks carried out by Transport Department 
officials and checks made by the gendarmerie, customs and other departments, 
figures for which have not been supplied. 
(3) The figure given is an estimate based on the number of fines imposed, 
warnings issued and infringements detected. 
(4) "Silent checks". 

-i!9 -
As for 1979, it is difficult to compare the figures for the number of 
checks  carried out, mainly because in most cases it is not specified  whether  the 
figures  relate  to "inspection operations" or the "number of crews checked". 

- 10 -
II) INFRINGEMENTS  AND  PENALTIES 
1) Number of infringements of the Regulation 
On this point, the standard form of report requires detailed 
figures on infringements detected in relation to goods transport, 
regular passenger transport and occasional passenger transport operations, 
committed on the  territory  of each Member State by nationals and foreigners 
(with  an indication of their country of origin). 
Each  Member State supplied the information at its disposal on 
this point. To make the figures more comparable, they have been grouped, 
as far as possible, in the same form, in the tables in annexes 1, 2 and 3, 
leaving blanks where no information was supplied, or the information received 
was inadequate. 
Contributions which, because of their presentation, cannot be 
included in the tables, but nevertheless have a certain value, are given 
separately. 
The table on goods transport (annex 1) shows the lack of figures 
concerning Regulation (EEC) No 543/69 in the  Irish  report and the lack of 
information on infringements committed by foreigners in Luxembourg and 
Denmark. 
The contributions which are the most detailed and most in line 
with  the standard form of report are those supplied by the Federal Republic 
of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (annexes 5, 6 and 10). 
It should however be stressed  that  the United Kingdom recorded no infringe­
ment of Article 6 (450 km); the Netherlands made no mention of this Article 
in its report (nor, moreover, did Denmark). 

- n -
Some  Member States (Denmark, France,  Italy)  gave overall 
figures for each article, making no distinction between goods transport 
and passenger transport operations, etc. As regards France, the tables 
supplied  do not show infringements of Article 8 (breaks). Most of the 
Member States did not give details on infringements of Article 7. 
Although  some aspects of the German and Dutch contributions 
were  still not perfect, they could form a basis for a method of collecting 
and presenting data on the practical application of social legislation in 
the field of road transport in each Member State and, consequently, through­
out the European Community. 
As regards regular and occasional passenger transport operations 
(annexes 2 and 3), the differences of assessment between the Member States  were 
even greater. Almost all of them did not give a full or satisfactory answer 
to the questions set out in the standard form of report. 
By way of example, the main shortcomings are as follows : 
- no distinction between occasional and regular services; 
- no distinction as to nationality; 
- unusable, vague and in some  cases  useless information, or information which 
does  not specify the Article, nationality or type of transport. 
- although in some  cases  the information provided was fairly complete, it 
was presented in a way which did not  take  account of the standard form 
of report and prevents the information from being arranged in a way which 
allows comparison  with  the other States. 

- 12 -
To sum up this section very briefly, the shortcomings in the 
information supplied by the Member States can be grouped  into  three main 
categories  : 
- lack of precise figures, 
- overall data  with  no breakdown by Article, 
- data broken down by Article, but  with  no distinction between 
passenger  and goods transport operations; 
even  contributions which were  fairly  detailed as regards the information 
supplied  were  often  presented in such a way  that  they cannot easily be  used. 
2. Infringements by nationals and foreigners respectively :  
comparative figures 
As has already been stated above, only some of the Member States 
made  a distinction between infringements committed by nationals and those 
committed by foreigners. 
The information supplied on this  point  is given in Annexes 
4, 5.1, 6.1, 6.2, and 7 and gives rise to the following comments : 
1) not all Member States supplied data; 
2) some Member States made no distinction between nationals and foreigners; 
3) the proportions of national and foreign vehicles varied according to the 
country and the  time  of the year. 
The number of infringements involving vehicles registered in 
other countries represented between 0.8 and 3.8 % of the  total  number of 
recorded infringements. 

- 13 -
3. Penalties  imposed 
As regards  penalties,  there was a  significant  difference  between  the number 
of infringements detected and the  number  of prosecutions; the  number  of 
penalties  imposed  was relatively  small. 
Of 1585 infringements detected in Belgium in connection with  goods transport 
operations,  13 (or 0.8%) involved foreigners, 478 (30%)  gave rise to official 
reports  and penalties  were imposed  in 26 cases (1.6%). In the case of regular 
passenger  transport, 97  checks  carried  out at operators' premises revealed 
18 infringements (19%) but no penalties  were imposed;  as regards occasional 
passenger  transport operations, 14 infringements (32%)  were detected  from 
43 checks  at operators' premises; the  number  ;of penalties  imposed  was not 
supplied;  there were around  1 000 roadside  checks  and they  gave rise to 
227 official  reports (134 nationals and 93  foreigners).  No penalties  were 
imposed  by the courts. 
As a result  of 151 infringements detected in  Denmark  (see tables,  annexes 
11.1 and 11.2), 109 persons  were prosecuted (72%). 
In the Federal Republic of  Germany , the BAG,  which  is the only  body with 
powers to impose  administrative  fines for infringements  committed  on the 
road by foreign  crew members  and operators, issued in 1980 a  total of 
16 655 administrative orders imposing  fines  on foreign operators and  drivers 
transporting  goods  or passengers by road. In addition the  authorities  issued 
1 742 written notices, 474  warnings  without  fines  and 16 726  warnings  with 
cautionary  fines.  Annexes  5.2.1 to 5.8.2 contain tables of the procedures 
instituted,  making  a distinction  between  infringements  committed  in goods , 
transport  operations and in  passenger  transport operations by operators 
(those in  charge  of the firm) and by  crew members  where  liable. 

- 14 -
In the year covered by the report, the Factories Inspectorate imposed a 
total  of 24 636 administrative fines, including 4 659 on operators and 
19 977 on crew members based or resident in the Federal Republic of Germany. 
In addition, the authorities issued 15 979 warnings  with  fines and 9 715 
warnings  without  fines. 
Of 363 432 infringements detected in France  in 1980, 91 710 (25%) led to 
prosecutions;  the courts imposed penalties in 26 481  cases  (7.3% of infringe­
ments detected). These figures are given in Annexes 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3. 
The amounts of fines for infringements committed after 23 July 1980 were 
raised  as follows : 
Previous  amount New amount 
FF 160 to FF 600 FF 600 to FF 1 200 
The Irish  Government's report was restricted to the number of infringements 
detected (5 869) and to oral warnings (cf. Annex 4), while  Italy  provided 
some  figures (cf. Annex 8). The relatively high number of infringements of 
Article  5 (age of drivers) committed by both Italians and foreigners driving 
in Italy  is worthy of note. 
In the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, a  total  of 2 719 infringements were recorded 
in respect of goods transport and 64 in respect of passenger transport. 
Oral  and  written  notices were issued and, in the most serious  cases,  official 
reports were sent to the judicial authorities  with  a view to prosecution. 

- 15 -
As regards the  scope  of penalties applied in the Netherlands , it should be 
noted  that  of a  total  of 41 735  infringements detected,  11 314  official reports 
(27%)  were  drawn up and  that  of 11 101  official reports concerning Dutch 
nationals,  10 715 (*) (97%)  led to further action, whereas of  213  official 
reports concerning foreign drivers only  42 (20%)  were  followed up and sent to 
the ' relevant authorities of the countries in question. The  total  amount  οϊ 
fines was HFL  2 339 555  (Annex  6.2). 
Of 10 734  infringements in the United Kingdom , 5 472 (53%)  resulted in fines 
totalling UKL.218  066  (Annex  11.3). 
'•X •  r ' '  "  y 
III.MULTILATERAL  MUTUAL  ASSISTANCE  BETWEEN  MEMBER  STATES  AND NOTIFICATION OF  
INFRINGEMENTS 
In Belgium , the Transport Department took note of  593  official reports on 
Belgian  crew members by German and French inspecting officers.  Lists  of 
official reports on crew members of vehicles registered in other Member 
States  were  sent to the relevant authorities for information  purposes. 
Denmark received notification of nine infringements committed by Danish 
nationals in the Netherlands and an unspecified number of fines paid by Danish 
drivers in the Federal Republic of Germany. 
The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany  held regular bilateral talks 
with  representatives of the Austrian, Dutch, Danish and French Governments  with 
a view to ensuring compliance  with  Regulations (EEC)  Nos  543/69  and  1463/70  and 
the AETR. 
France  reported  that  it had sent its partners a list of their nationals who had 
committed infringements of Community Regulations  543/69  and  1463/70  on French 
territory.  : 
•Vi. • • 
, On the other hand, the French Government stated  that  it had not received 
(*) 11 101 - 386 = 10 715  (cf.  table  Annex  6.2). 

- 16 -
notification of any infringements committed by French drivers on the  territory 
of the other Member States,  with  the exception of Belgium and the Federal 
Republic  of Germany. 
Ireland reported  that  it sent a list of foreign vehicles found to have committed 
infringements on its  territory  to the other Member States every three months 
and also  that  it received similar lists concerning  Irish  vehicles found to be 
in breach of the rules in the United Kingdom and  France. 
Italy  is still waiting to finalize a system of recording the information in 
the form of statistics. 
Luxembourg  merely reported  that  it notified "several serious infringements" 
to the other Member States. 
The Dutch authorities reported  that  they notified 61 infringements to the 
Federal  Republic of Germany and received notification of 3 122 infringements 
from Germany and 107 from Belgium. In addition, action was taken against Dutch 
drivers in 184  cases  of infringement notified by Belgium and 39 reported by 
France. 
The United Kingdom reported infringements committed by foreign crews to the 
authorities of the Member States in question every three months and stated 
that it received occasional reports concerning UK crews in other Member States. 
There  are certain obvious contradictions in these reports, e.g. where a Member 
State  reported  that  it sent the list of infringements committed by foreigners to 
all the Member States in question while at the same time the other Member States 
or at least some of them maintained  that  they received nothing. 
IV. SUGGESTIONS  AND  COMMENTS  BY THE  MEMBER  STATES 
Belgium  reported a change in the nature of infringements of Regulation (EEC) 
No. 543/69 in 1980; more than half of them related to the limits on distance 
and driving time, while those concerning the possession of an individual control 
book were on the decline. 

- 17 -
Denmark wanted to extend the  scope  of the standard form of report to cover 
the application of Regulation (EEC) No  1463/70  and the  AETR  and would like 
its format to be simplified so  that  the Member could send uniform information 
to the  Commission.  The Danish Factories Inspectorate is considering establishing 
a file  on infringements committed by operators which could be used for the 
purposes  of issuing international transport permits. 
Ireland  has set up a special observation committee  within  the Employment 
Department which meets once a month for the purpose of examining the situation 
and issuing guidelines for solving difficulties encountered. The  Irish  authorities 
feel that  greater efforts should be made, either through the press or through 
individual contacts, to convince those subject to the social legislation  that 
it is both necessary and beneficial. 
-' . »· .  "'.V ' •· 
The United Kingdom considers  that  the application of Regulation (EEC) No  543/69 
could  be greatly facilitated by minor changes and requests the Commission to 
start a  discussion  of such  changes. 

- 18 -
V. COMMENTS BY THE COMMISSION ON THE INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE  MEMBER  STATES 
1. Member States'contributions to the annual report 
The Commission notes  that  the differences in the presentation of the information 
supplied  by the Member States have scarcely changed. 
The standard form of report was often not completed properly. The Commission is 
aware  of the problems posed by the standard form of report and is ready to  dis­
cuss  with  national governments changes which  will  adapt the report to present 
requirements  while  taking account of the national administrative procedures 
involved  in sending contributions to the  Commission. 
2. Number and powers of the Inspectorate 
The Commission notes  that  in most Member States the number of inspectors  fell 
compared  with  1979.  Only Belgium and France slightly increased the number of 
inspectors,  which resulted in a significant increase inthenumber of checks and 
penalties. 
3. Inspection methods 
There was a tendency towards greater uniformity of checks as compared  with 
previous  years,  such  checks being carried out both at the roadside (generally 
by the police and the gendarmerie) and at operators' premises (by officials 
from the Factories Inspectorate and the Ministry of Transport). However, it is 
difficult, if not impossible, to compare the situation  with  regard to the 
organization of checks in all the Member States. 
It is interesting to note  that  some Member States took measures to improve the 
results  of inspections through computerization. In the Federal Republic of 
Germany,  some LSnder planned to process the data resulting from checks by 
computer  and France stepped up the use of equipment especially designed for 
thesemi-automatic reading of tachograph  discs. 

- 19 -
The introduction in the United Kingdom of the ^'silent check" system, 
which was extended in 1980 to around 80 000  checks,  could also prove 
to be very interesting at Community level. 
Apart from these  three  positive aspects, the main finding is  that  : 
- the figures supplied concerning staff employed to carry out checks 
were, in some  cases,  rather vague ; 
- the figures concerning the number of checks revealed considerable 
differences  between the national administrative systems. 
4. Inf£ingements_by__nationa!§_and_non-;nationals 
The Commission received no detailed figures on the numbers of foreign 
vehicles  in the Member States. In general, the figures  were  low compared 
with  the  total  number of vehicles on the road and varied greatly from 
one Member State to another.  Different  degrees of application and legal, 
judicial and linguistic problems made it difficult to  take  action on 
infringements committed by foreigners. 
Moreover, the fact  that  some Member States did not supply complete 
information makes it impossible to collate meaningful figures. More 
accurate conclusions could be drawn if the relationship between the 
number of  checks,  the number of infringements detected and the penalties 
applied  in respect of both nationals and non-nationals was known for 
all Member States. -':· 
The method of collecting information and presenting figures should 
therefore be standardized further to enable the Commission to make 
a more clear-cut assessment of the progress achieved. 

-  20  -
5. PenaLtjes
There is some difficulty in analyzing this point, firstly because  
the penalties were sometimes imposed some considerable time after  
the infringement was detected, and, secondly because the method used  
in each Member State and the fines imposed for the same infringement  
varied greatly from one country to another. Furthermore, the inform­
ation supplied does not give a satisfactory overall view of the  
situation in the Community. One can therefore make only a very rough  
assessment.
Although some Member States supplied detailed information on the fines  
imposed, others gave no details at all. The information was so hetero­
geneous that it is difficult to make positive comparisons. It is clear,  
however, that there were still differences between the Member States  
with regard to penalties and the rigour with which they were applied.
The general impression is that in too many cases an infringement was  
simply recorded or a mere warning given, particularly where foreigners  
were involved(and that the penalties imposed were not in keeping with  
the nature of the infringements committed or the public interest.
Clearly, the section "Checks and Penalties" is the one in which the  
differences in applying Regulations (EEC) Nos 543/69 and 1463/70 are  
the most obvious.

-21  -
6. Mutual assistance
Although some Member States claimed that they notified infringements  
committed by foreign nationals/ and that there was an exchange of  
information on the ways in which Regulation (EEC) No. 543/69 was applied,  
an effective system of mutual assistance between all Member States, as  
stipulated in the Regulation (Article 18(2)), was still a long way off.  
The need to intensify and improve these contacts therefore remains a  
common task for all Member States.

-  22  -
PART TWO
A. CONCLUSIONS DRAWN BY THE COMMISSION FROM VISITS TO MEMBER STATES HADE BY  
OFFICIALS FROM DG VII
The Commission is using the publication of the tenth report to summarize  
below a number of impressions and findings which emerged from visits to  
Member States made during 1981 and 1982.
The programme for these visits included :
- Discussions with the Government, employers1  organizations and trade unions  
The subjects for discussion were :
a) Problems concerning inspections and penalties, especially the following :
- staff assigned to inspections ;
- inspection methods and frequency of checks ;
- technical difficulties encountered during checks ;
- application of the Regulation to nationals and foreigners ;
- monitoring of AETR ;
- multilateral assistance between Member States (government level);
- legal liability in the event of infringement.
b) Improvement of the standard form of report (Article 17 of Regulation  
(EEC) No. 543/69)to be supplied by the Member States.
c) Application of the ban on certain types of payment (Article 12 a of 
Regulation (EEC) No. 543/69).
- Taking part in inspections
a) At operators' premises.
b) At the roadside :
- on a motorway with a considerable amount of international traffic
- on a road carrying national traffic.

- 23 -
These visits enabled the Commission to form a fairly detailed and relatively  
complete picture of the situation in the Member States.
The conclusions drawn may be summarized as follows :
I. CONTROL
A. Organization of inspection
1. The Commission cannot escape the ffeling that in some Member States  
more people should be emplyed to carry out checks both at the road-
.. side and at operators' premises, but it concedes that there are  
budgetary obstacles to increasing the number of staff in the present
Zi. t , ;
economic situation.
2. Expressed as a percentage, the number of crews and vehicles checked,  
both at the roadside and at operators' premises, varies greatly from  
one country to another. Some degree of alignment upwards is called  
for ; this is especially true for checks at operators' premises.
3. Only in France has a degree of semi-automation been achieved in  
carrying out checks at operators' premises through the use of a machine  
(Sabine). The Commission feels that automation in the other Member  
States is very desirable, indeed essential in the larger countries.
4. In Ireland, an adequate inspection system has now been introduced  
and infringements are now being penalized.
5. It has become apparent that checks have been carried out in Italy for  
some years. The fact that the Italian Government has not supplied  
adequate information to the Commission appears to have been the  
result of a lack of coordination between various government  
departments. Measures have been taken to improve this situation.

- 24 -
6. The Commission has the impression that the organization of inspections  
in Luxembourg is still inadequate and that there is a tendency to leave  
checks to the neighbouring countries. However, Luxembourg reports that  
it has taken measures to remedy these shortcomings.
7. In some Member States, the roadside checks concentrate on the daily driving  
period and disregard the length of periods of continuous driving. The Com­
mission considers that such a practice is incompatible with the proper  
application of the Community Regulation.
8. In the Federal Republic of Germany, a film which gives an excellent  
picture of the organization and aims of checks, and the objectives of  
Regulation (EEC) No. 543/69 is making a significant contribution to the  
proper understanding and application of the Regulation.
B. Technical problems associated with checks
1. Some Member States (Belgium and Luxembourg claim that they come up  
against a number of technical difficulties in carrying out inspections :
- stopping vehicles is dangerous ;
- number of places where the checks can be carried out is very limited.
Luxembourg added the following points :
- its small area ;
- shortage of policemen.
2. The Commission notes that in some cases language difficulties preclude  
effective checks. However, some Member States,such as the United Kingdom  
and the Federal Republic of Germany have overcome the problem by means  
of a multilingual book of questions and instructions. The Commission  
requests the other Member States to follow this example.
Furthermore, the Commission notes a regrettable tendency in some Member  
States to neglect checks on non-nationals, because of language difficult­
ies, translation costs and the difficulties of imposing penalties. This  
shortcoming will have to be remedied if the Community Regulation is to  
be applied effectively.

- 25 -
II.INFRINGEMENTS
1. The Commission notes the usual infringements, such as :
- exceeding the daily, weekly and two-weekly driving periods ;
- failing to observe the daily rest period ;
- failing to keep 7 discs ;
- leaving a disc in the equipment for a number of days.
2. In addition, the following infringements have been noted :
- In a’case of transport operations carried out by own account
.  operators, the Commission observed certain methods of arranging  
i .  work and rest periods which, although not exactly correct from the  
point of view of the Community Regulation, may be considered very  
favourable from a social point of view. In the case of transport  
operations for third parties, however, the situation is much less  
ideal ;
- The failure of some drivers to switch the selector to "rest", so  
that the equipment continues to record "work" ;
- The failure of some two-man crews to share continuous driving  
equally, thus enabling the Regulation to be observed ;
- Infringements of driving time even in light vehicles carrying out  
transport operations over a short distance.
3. Employers in Italy claimed that the lack of security in that country
was the reason for infringements of the daily driving period. The
Commission feels that this question should be examined by the
Italian Government in order to improve security for vehicles and
their.crews in that country.

26
III. PROBLEMS CONCERNING PENALTIES
A. Level of penalties
The Commission is aware of the fact that the level of penalties is  
determined by national laws, the administrative and judicial pro­
cedures of each country andy ultimately^ the decision of the persons  
or bodies imposing fines. _
The Commission feels that an attempt should nevertheless be made to  
establish a reasonable relationship between penalties on the one  
hand and the economic gain resulting from the infringement on the  
other.
B. Powers of the inspection authorities-
1. The Commission found that these powers vary greatly from one Member  
State to another. In some States, for example, the authorities have  
the power to :
- refuse entry to crews who have contravened the rules ;
- immobilize a crew for 8 hours ;
- return a crew to its base ;
- suspend or withdraw the transport operator's permit.
2. Some other Member States do not have such powers, or not all of  
them. The Luxembourg authorities state that they do not even have  
the power to seize a crew'sdiscs in the event of an infringement.
C. Imposition of penalties on non-nationals
1. In the Commission's view, this is an important problem in the  
area of penalties,which are essential to the proper application  
of the Community Regulation.

-27
2. In some Member States such as the Federal Republic of Germany,
France the authorities have the power
to require non-nationals to pay a deposit on the spot. Italy  
has a similar system, but is not able to force foreigners to  
pay.
3. The Commission feels that the establishment of a system of  
deposits is an effective means of ensuring that the Regulation  
is properly applied.
D. Problem of liability of drivers and operators
1. In some Member States, both drivers and operators are liable in  
the event of an infringement. In the Netherlands, only the employer  
is liable, which means that, in conjunction with the principle of  
operating under a flag, few, if any, penalties are imposed on non­
nationals.
2. The Commission noted that in Belgium, Luxembourg Ireland and in  
Italy also few, if any, penalties are imposed on nationals of  
another country.
3. A similar problem arises through the exclusive application of the  
principle of territoriality (e.g. in the Federal Republic of  
Germany), as a result of which only infringements committed on  
the territory of the Member State in question are penalized.
E. Technical problems relating to penalties
According to the  
cards could make  
non-nationals.Danish authorities, the increasing use  
it more difficult to obtain payment ofof credit 
fines from

28
F.Cooperation between competent authorities
1. The Commission observed a Lack of cooperation in several Member  
States between the authorities responsible for carrying out  
inspections and the judicial authorities.
2. The Commission notes that this cooperation still leaves a  
great deal to be desired. In this connection, the Italian  
Government has announced its intention to apply directly to  
the Commission in the absence of a response to its approaches  
to the other Member States.

29
IV. PROBLEMS CONCERNING TACHOGRAPHS
A. INSTALLATION
In most Member States, tachographs are installed in all vehicles  
covered by the Regulations. In three Member States the situation  
in this respect is still not satisfactory.
B. FRAUDS
The Commission detected the following frauds :
- inserting a human hair or rubber band to falsify the speed recording
- concealing discs showing infringements ;
- unnecessarily using several discs consecutively in a relatively  
short period in order to conceal excess driving hours.
C. IMPROVING THE TACHOGRAPH SYSTEM
1. The following means of countering such faults have been suggested  
to the Commission :
- introducing a system whereby producers number all discs and  
operators register all the discs they purchase ;
- developing an electronic tachograph ;
- providing crews with a waybill estimating the timing for the  
trip.

30
D.2. The Commission is favourably disposed towards the first two  
recommendations. It plans to convene the Committee referred  
to in Article 22 of Regulation (EEC) No 1463/70 with a view  
to promoting the development of an electronic tachograph.
Secondary technical problems associated with the tachograph
The Commission has found that the use of discs which are not  
approved for a particular tachograph sometimes gives rise to  
problems.

- 31 -
V. BAN ON CERTAIN TYPES OF PAYMENT (ARTICLE 12A OF REGULATION  
(EEC) No 543/69)
The Commission notes that such payments are still being made  
in several States.
It is currently examining points concerning the satisfactory  
application of Article 12 a).

- 32 -
B. FINAL CONCLUSIONS BY THE COMMISSION*
The following general conclusions may be drawn from the information received  
and impressions gained during visits to the Member States :
1. As regards control arrangements, all governments are making serious efforts  
to carry out their duties with regard to the proper application of Community  
law. These efforts are all the more laudable as the always require close  
coordination between various authorities at national, regional and local  
levels, which implies a great deal of cooperation and good will on the  
part of all the officials involved. One must also bear in mind the fact  
that all these administrative units are not only responsible for the  
Community rules in question but also have much wider tasks usually con­
cerning a very broad range of provisions relating to public order.
Of course, there are differences with regard to the quantity and - it  
must be admitted - quality of inspection measures from one Member State  
to another and even from one part of a country to another. There are a  
number of reasons which are so obvious that they do not need to be listed  
or explained in detail. Traditions, political priorities, the view of the  
relationship between the State and the individual citizen and last but  
not least financial resources (to mention only a few basic factors) are  
not identical in all Member States of the Community.
♦These conclusions do not cover the situation in Greece, which has  
not yet been visited.

- 33 -
However, the need to Live with these situations is not incompatible with  
the principle of compliance with Community Law in this field as well, a  
requirement which cannot be renounced. Efforts to achieve a harmonization  
of measures and results which are as equivalent as possible must therefore  
be continued.
2. Even more marked differences are apparent as regards penalties for infringe­
ments of the two Regulations. Here, too, differences between the national  
legal systems, differences of opinion as regards the distinction between  
criminal and civil infringements, and actual constitutional principles,  
such as the independence of the courts, prevent a harmonization of the  
actual penalties imposed in the Member States.
Even in this area, however, progress is possible in an attempt to achieve  
a gradual approximation of penalties imposed in the case of similar in­
fringements by at least avoiding the most blatant differences between  
national practices.
This is a process which should be based not on binding legislation but  
on the voluntary cooperation of the national authorities in question, in  
accordance with common principles and guidelines set out (e.g. in the form  
of a recommendation) by the Community Institutions.
This process has already been set in motion by the Commission.
3. All those who could and should consider themselves as "addressees" of  
the rules in question therefore have the important task of improving the  
situation. However, the main responsibility for this task naturally lies  
with the national authorities.
Measures to improve the situation are applicable in all areas and at all  
levels of increased cooperation between the competent authorities. Parti­
cularly important in this respect is the permanent exchange of interesting  
and useful information. Another aspect deserving more attention than in the  
past is the use of modern techniques for checks and penalties ; the opportuni­
ties and prospects which already exist or which will open up in the future 
in this field have not been fully exploited or even realized yet.

- 34 -
4. In these circumstances, the fact that the number of infringements of  
Regulations (EEC) 543/69 and 1463/70 has remained at a relatively  
high level for some years and that there is not the slightest sign  
of a fall (indeed, at the present time one has the impression that  
the opposite is true given the economic situation) is a disturbing  
one.
This situation raises the question of whether the social provisions  
adopted in the field of road transport are properly adapted to the  
economic and social realities of our time and whether, rather than  
through checks and penalties, a reduction in the number of infringe­
ments should be achieved through a better balance between, on the one  
hand, the required harmonization of competiton conditions, road safety  
and social progress and, on the other, the needs associated with the  
rational and economically efficient organization of road transport.
5. It is with this in view that the Commission has undertaken the  
revision of Regulations (EEC) Nos. 543/69 and 1463/70. This action  
does not signify resignation in the face of the illegal practices  
which some say could never be eliminated. What it is intended to do
is :
- draw the appropriate lessons from what is now more than 20 years'  
experience
- concentrate on the fundamental provisions, giving them the necessary  
flexibility to take account of special situations
- establish a stable system which does not continually give rise to  
heated discussion, which is geared to the aims laid down in the  
framework of the common transport policy and which is capable
of promoting road safety and social progress.
( 3 )

- 35 -
ANNEXES
1. Goods transport (infringements detected)
2. Regular passenger transport (infringements detected)
3. Occasional passenger transport (infringements detected)
4. Ireland. Infringements detected, broken down by Article and nationality
5.1. Federal Republic of Germany. Infringements detected, broken down by  
Article (nationals and foreigners)
5.2.1 to 5.8.2 Federal Republic of Germany. Proceedings initiated (by way  
of example)
6.1 Netherlands. Infringements detected, broken down by Article and nationality
6.2. Netherlands. Amounts of penalties recorded by nationality
7. France. Infringements detected and prosecuted, broken down by nationality
8. Italy. Infringements detected
9.1 France. Checks at operators' premises. Overall figures
9.2 France. Roadside checks. Overall figures Regulation (EEC) No. 1463/70
9.3 France. Penalties imposed
10. United Kingdom. Vehicles inspected and infringements detected
11.1 Denmark. Infringements and penalties (employers)
11.2 Denmark. Infringements and penalties (drivers)
11.3 United Kingdom. Penalties

Annex 1
1DK
Nat. For. Nat. F <
Art. 6 450 k m . Lim . 321
Art.7 . 1  driving period -4h.k,
•  Cart. 6) )
Art. 7 2 daily driv. period
8 h. (art. 6)
‘Art.74 weekly driv. period
48 h. (art. 6) 192T3A rt.7 .1  driving p etrited 267 1
( not art. 6)
A rt. 7'2 daily driv. period16
8 h. (not art. 6)1\
Art.74 w eek driving period
48 h. (not art. 6) i
Art. 8 breaks 22
Art.11.1 daily rest period 95 1 30
Art.12 weekly rest period 9
Art.1 4 .1  and annexes 37
Indiv. control book3 1
Art.142 -Control book not 113 j
in order
Art.14 - others 151
Art. 15.1 Regular services 8
Regular serv.timetabl« \3
Art.152 Regular services 15
operator
Others 326 1 1 84
T O T A L  1572 13 151
"  Nat. ♦  For. 1585 151
Official reports478 109
Prosecutions 26 1091980
GOODS TRANSPORT
D F I R L I L N L UK
Nat. For. fiat. For. Nat. For. Nat. For. Nat. For. Nat. For. Nat. For.
41 8 2730 168 807
5750 652" \
12666 792 1 1 2 3
730 19 97 1851
2878 7 1I - 2 2 2 S 0
I  . . .466! 100 310
4471 0 10262 \ 283
7091 (2 4
2572 133 165 1381 35
82 - J J0
JJ
2841 385 473 102 10
6284 491 72 i99 >5449 492 219 9320 171 89 30
593 4 / > 7 28 39
0 129 2 2834 1891 52 5 5099 114
35631 >  9260I2402! 258 159
3 4 I1
2
51506 2672 330! 15 5 1
66676 5231 473034 5011 107464 10799 2778 40098 696 9994 380
71907 478.045 118263 40794 10374
42006(Av) 183109 3624 2196 11056 3881
24M6 183109 3624 402 5472

A nnex 2
N at8 D K
For. N at For.
Art. .  6 450 k m  Lim .
Art. ,7J drivi ng per iod - 4 h
(art. 6)
Art. .7 .2 dai ly driv. period
8 h. (art. 6)
Art. .7.4 weekly driv . period
48 h. (art. 6)
Art. .7.1 drivi ng per iod
(not a rt. 6)
Art. ,72daily drivi period
8 h. (not a rt. 6)
Art.74 weekly driv. period  
48 h. (not art. 6)
Art. 8 breaks
Art.1\2 daily rest period  
Art.12 weekly rest period
Art.1V and annexes
Indiv.control book  
Art.142 -  control book  
not in order  
Art.14 - others
Art.1 5 .1  regular services  
Regualr'services timetable  
Art.152 regular services  
operator
others
TOTAL
"  Nat. +  For.
Official reports
ProsecutionsR E G U L A R  P A S S E N G E R  T R A N S P O R T 1980
D f IR L ' L
Nat.
12
169
144
203
107
16
104
106
16
69
96For.
3
12
3
3
10
2
4
12Nat. For. Nat. For- Nat. For. Nat. For. N at
V
y
)N L
For. Nat
37
79
JU K
For.
1042 49 131
1091

Annex 3 OCCASIONAL PASSENGER TRANSPORT 1980
Art. 6 450 k m . L im .
Art.7 . 1  driv ing period - 4h.  
(art. 6)
Art.7 .2  daily driving perio  
8 h. (art. 6)
Art.7 .4  weekly driv.period  
48 h. (art. 6)
Art.7 . 1  driving period 4h.
( not art. 6)
Art. 7 ,2  daily driving period  
8 h. (not art. 6)  
Art.7 ,4  weekly driv. period  
48 h. ( not art. 6)
Art. 8 breaks
Art.112 daily rest period
Art.12 weekly rest period
Art.1 4 ,1  and annexes  
Ind. control book  
Art. 14,2 - control book not  
in order  
Art.14 - others
Art.1 5 .1  regular services  
regular services timetable  
Art.152 regular services  
operator
others
TOTAL
"  Nat. +  For.
Official reports  
Prosecutions227
227
164495 5
3B D K D (*) I R L ;  (**) L N L
1
Nat. For. Nat. For. Nat. For. flat. For. Nat. For. Nat. For. Nat. For. Nat. 1  For.
0 4
263 6A
90 23
> 14
f  ^ /524 83 1
1
593 64 J
)2 1
0 244 58
2 1164 30 294
0 92 4 4
17
2 (  630
128 93 1472 206 10
134 93 4471 474 10 5 1013U K
Nat. For.
{*)•For France and Italy cf. tables in the following annexes.

Annex 4
IRELAND - Infringements detected:
Goods transport
Art i c leRegular Services Occasional services
Nationals Foreigners (UK) Nationals Foreianors (UK)
14/1 18 - 2363 33 ;
14/2 - 53 10 !
15/1 165 3— _
* (a) 37 - 1696 40
(b) 15 - 1159 90
(c)- - 103 11
TOTAL 235 3 5374 184
Regulation 1463/70 (a) No tachograph
<b) Tachograph installed but not used
<c) Tachograph not calibrated
Passenger transport
'Artie leRegular services Occasional services !
Nationals Foreigners (UK) Nationalsi
Foreigners (UK)
14/1 1 - 25i
14/2 - - -i
II
15/1 13- - ii
*  (a) 3 19
(b) 1 - 11 -
(c) - - -
TOTAL 18 - 55
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __J
Ré
gulâtion 1463/70 (a) No tachograph
(b) Tachograph installed but not used
(c) Tachograph not calibrated
TOTAL: 5869

ANNEX 5.1.
GERMANY
Infringements in 1980
GOOC>S PASSENGERS
ARTICLE
Nat. For.Regular Occasional
Nat. For. Nat.For.
Reg.(EEC) No 543/69
6 41 8 12- 4-
1 - >07.1 5.750 652 169 3 263 6
0) • *0 «HC L.7.2 12.666 792 14412 90 23
O <D7.4 730 19 -- 4-
l_0)■oc oD7.1
7.32.878
2.5727 1
133203
1073 524
59383'
64Not 
art.
7.
4 82 - 16 - 21 -
8 .2.841 385 104 3 244 58
11.1 6.284 491 -- - -
11.2 - - 10610 1.164 30
12 593 4 162 92 4
15.1 3 4 6 94 - -
15.5 22 8 9 612 — -
Reg.(EEC) No 1463/70
15 3.310 308 - - 349 10-
16 61 - - - - -
17 27.968 2.356 - - 1.084 93
18 145 39103

OrdnunKSvldrlgkaltan-Vcrfahren nach den FahrperaonalgeBetB gcgen Auawartlga
1m Jahre 1980
OCtar- a. ParaonankraftTarkahr Inageaaat
?erv*raur.gen ohae 
?e r«#arr.ur. r  z ~ tl £Verweraungea a l t  
Verwerr.uaBaBc.ldbM Ch.14. S 0 ■  ■  •
L an dr.nG-I»!l>
e .aV c .le t
Z}n;r«
M itteXi:«  3«
:• £  k- 
* « it* -lac
*i-ke-
z e lt.iag*a
T o h rf
s t r i b
ke» .» K «
-«aJ o a tr .
X itto lx ;e  Be
Lenk-
s e lti t ; n u
Buke-ages
FeLr»
• tr e k
keM«3-
aaksea
A&Sa/CMV vrlet
K or.tr.
M lttels : t  Be*
Leak-
a e lttia x ja
3 u te-
t t l t5#a
F a k rt-
• tre k -
k in ib se s
k X L t . / l *V .rlc t
K o atr.
H t t o ls t*  B.
U h k -
x * lt■elm s
iu h .-
n l t-age*
F akrt*
• tr e k -
keRaB-
aakaeeV .rl
C o a tr.
M itta l• t z t .
L.C1-1
n i tBeattfl
Boat*M ltm ag es
F a k rt-
a tre k -
ke
k ! I3V H I >3 17 6 3w i
6*20 2012 791 268* 3919
1059612 2379 1V75 555 1a7V35V V 76 2 2 » <29 131
KTQ1
2D rz
300 2 3 3
AL2
V O 22
300 2‘ -V V•
And1
150 1 1 1
i
* v i  u ? 33 10 6 V 21958
39153 vod 660 2W1378
325138 9V9 7V0 198 3 3506 2170 1V35 V26 3
1  1  
BG I 7 3•9V
1880 91 327
5V3J H 15 2 u » * 5 * 1
■ ■'■■■< - - - - - - —1
l _
 j M;CH 5* V VI 5■ a 23 6 3 f t389
7700 2 * 1V6 9333
v s m*25V 73 (V 797 & vvv TW TV
---------1  
1  
i c s  : 53V
(80 29 3 22 t
2370 ( 1 60 V 31
j 11  !1
250 11 <
1— r ~
r n a  j v V 1 110V
2080 90 K38
5610 33 7 1V71321
l a1I
132 j 71 63 3 5V V9 5•*32
12630 395 179 581190
29056; 789 V77 208 2 2008 130V 72V 277 5
!
|*15 J  * 5! 1 2 6 6139
2780 130 920C
39590 171 9 12 9 368 317 3V 13 H
tJ b e r-
i t r a g
Iw-i «-aa!I
7131  zzfij
n<iassn*M .----- f ~
H2
j 27
siaaaaaaca15
tsasa*a * 151
saa*aa27
aeaat29
-.-..J J .6V2V
128V50 V0V6[ 1805■B fiaatasisai573T ia
*35731k a  a «>■>■V38O299V *V9* B B B «206
ia«a«aa<I  1V V 61
a aaaa as* a >8803» ai> a» a<V968*aa-aa1669 22V
anaaai
IC -Anlage 2/1Annexe 5.2.1

OrdnungewldriKkelten-Verfahren nach de« Fahrperaonalgeaett gegen Auavartlrce
l a  J a h re  1980
O liter- a . P e re o n e a k ra ftv c rk e h r in ag e a a n t
Be\ehrii?4tVarvarrunjaa oka* VcrvaniuncecaldVervaraungea alt VarwarcucirsKaZdBufifcldbaachaldt s • ■ ■ •
Land>Ui-aah-seaVerla t j
Soctr.Mittalit* £•
Lack-saltB'ika-L«iting*a
Tairt strafe kt •MaA-oah-□anVerlat
Kontr.Mittalit* Bai
Int­uititiaau:
Soha-saltsge&
TakrtatrakkaMa£~cahaaaAax./EMVarlat
Koctr.Mittalst« B01 
Lask- saltitlnui
Buka-*«lt•!«
Fahrt-atrak-kaKaB- aakcea lac./CMVarla
Koatr*Mittalttta B 
Lank- *«lttatiaa
Buh#-ang«&
Fahrt-atrak-kaM«£-aakaaaSoutr.K<tt*ll«tata
Lask-itltBaatl
Baka-a«ltaaaagaa
Takrt-atrak-k«
tlbar-
trag715226*27152*151272D5tat
1286606066180557371201835730638029*1069 2061666188036968*69226
T5001*17995213«251t1208
2)62006605911371669
81015563613S252 23327*26 m6515
Fh 311117
123 a22
665059T662 a V 7
OB*171 11 3280*551s*5
2*76•9*8128821216*•1
QB35 !9675
99003915529’ 680 
9298739582* 99979313773
H1•a
63)«37
C50r 21a3-
I17?-332763*0
696001?a12876133K1
769650«66C50667 687133992363952<
IB 15
CO3217
3530*2 23t6
IBL53 '■ 11 
22065a
60s22 9 6231 *
IRQ -1
201 11
JOR■  •3
60214
3902 1661 1
KTj
30<2 22
3a c rc - ?jo Aalage 2 / 'llber-
tr a g
.155.% i 5 2 382 IffW286 5 1 27 6*809
2562006792 5805 12*126*
j s sW71* 5680 1827 222 25955 *651 9666 5m r a

Ordnunft6vldrigkei>n-Vcrrahren nach dem rahrpersonalgesett gegen Au^art iga
ia Jahre 1980
Ofltcr- n. Personenkraftverkehr inagegaat
*»#rv«raur.£eo ohna  
Vervarcua«rs*a14V*rvarfiung»£ a it  
V#rvarmiar*<el4BuBgaldbtachat<· i a i l t
L a n diUA·
ech-
saaV crli;
Scat.·.
S it t e ls : · 2 ; i U t s
leik-}Suc«-  
s a it c e i tjn£*a
r tbr*.-
jtrafc-
kaaafc-
rcaVe.- le t
Kontr.
K itt*:Kt« Bt
Ler_k-
s a itItiWrUI
Buha-
« • ltsgaa
Fahrt*
•trek*
k ·Ma3-
a*k*aaVerlat
Eontr.
K itt*:t u  B«8
Leak-
s a lttiaaoa
Rah«*·
s a ltf« a
r» h rt-
strek -
kan»a-
cahaaa
A c . / t aVarlat
Koatr.
M ittals ta  B«
Leak-
s a ltatlaar
Buha-
*»Itaga a
Fahrt-
atrak-
kaK*2-
aahaaaV.r]
Kcatr·
M ittal•ta t*
Laak-
M lt•<at<a
tuba-
s a ltutuasas
fa h r t-
atrak -
» ·
0 b « r -  
t r a g i  1 5 3 361 323 « 18 377 28V 58 27 VT5809
236200
(7% 3837 - J 2 Ä12V9V
352B0V67HV5V80 * 2 7 222 29933 1V631 966V 3150 2V V
------------i—
L  ! 15 ** 11 V V 1 1(8
1360 33 23fi85
3V380 55 53 6 1 179 « 2 8V 19 2
L i b a i1
15» 1 1 1
t T i2
V » 1 1 2 1 1
iH A1
a11 1
!—  
1  MC•1
200111
1—  
Nt> 5 5 2 1 2138
9 ( 099 31 8212
ttX * 1V1 76 « 7 362 297 H i a 7
N LV « a t 1 « 53 1 56 53 S“ T M l
72829
1859 1V67 323“ W T
978770« t o 133V V35 Vi 7115 3821 29* • n 52
P3 3 2 1 1 » 9 5H
V V 5D «
___L53 V2 11 2
P L2*J 2------- I T
3 » *"  12  
« 0 9 V V 35 3116
s ,II
ia
IMaa
5 « * 22 V to V2 1
RSM j- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 —
I
I2
to 1 1I
13a V 1 1 1 5 2 1
U b e F f --------
tr
ag!
» „ . . . A m— t—  
. . . s » L w . „ B i . . . A . l . . » .15»
,2*a u
A & V ···5333
ic p « * a<1557
•■■« •a15873
V9968V2
lltUlll9086 6956
«••»a2289
a · · · ·276 33739
b······»«* 9 5
[«««•as1280V
iaseaiV013 305
• •••Ml
3i5 IS - 2JO An lag* <3/’ .?

Ordmmgawidrigkeiten-Verft ren nach dem Fahrparcoaalgeeetz nurva. '-lgt
la Jahre 1980
GUter- n. PeraonenkraftTcrkehr insgesaat
£ te s t* llc s ^ Varvaroungtn oho* 
Vervarnurtsi'tldTarvaraunjts s it 
VarvarcuataraldB»Sf»ldb«sch»id. S a •  % a
ri-,-,i • *  — 1  ;
! aaa
L a n d  |v*r l , t‘ '© sir.
MittaX3«
=«itiit-4
S -ia-Irthri- 
sa lt I strafe 
!ktash-
aaaVarlet
Koatr.
K ittal*te B «
Lank-
sa lt9?i=a».
Saha-
*#itngen
Tahrt
strike
k*Xtfl-
cahua
Au./2MVeriat
Eontr-
.Hittalzxt Be
Ltak- 
st It•tisaui
Sana-
sa ltIftB
Takrt-
atrak-
icaKiS-
nahata
iam./WV trlt
lo a tr.
K ltttltz tt B
Lank-
sa ltcat lac
2uht-
M ltoagta
T airt-
strak-
k«Xnfl-
naittanVar
Koatr.
K ittalla ta tt
Lack*
sa ltB»at<
ISuha- 
!  aaltaauBftn
Pahrt-
a trtk -
kt
O b e r-! 
t r a g  | 1691 649 449 1 y 24449 346 66 a 515726
314540 8844 5333 155715873
4598342 9086 6956 2289 276 33739 18925 12804 4013 305
1!sn92 1 1194
3880 164 22 8105
20146 72 331 1 311 246 57 14 1
i
!s f! 4 1 3 1 1 185
1700 68* 1;48
8520 J t 17 5 2 138 V I 36 7 l
h  ! 2 2a
480 22 217
675 « 1 2 43 a 3 2
I-----
|ST
H2 23
60 34
650 4'. 9 1I1;t n1a 1- ■  ■
1 1
Tfla 5 5281
5620 250 a 7379
63560 357 a 7 695 612 aa
TO*14■B412
8240 >15 62 35.  229 
45765176 53 33 663 501 115 68
1*
1 ----------
i1«•
1!
r i-
I
e
'S um ne•1742 659 454] 140 24 474 367 66a 5
lasaaai*726
j m . , . 2 2 . m*08■  SMIt ia»M a16655
4738158
■ m a n9742
aaaaaai7084
aa«aai2342
BMaa279 35597 20435 13063
»••••4TB
Anlige 2 /k

Prdnuagawldrlgkelt»a-V«rfahr«n aach dew FaJirpersonelgeeetz g.gea AuB.nrtjge
!■ Jahr* I98O
Outer- u. Peraonenkraftverkehr Unternebaer
lic.»tellung/B^lehrcEC?*rvarnuagtn ohna /«rw»rnuagsg«ldVervsraungea alt VervaraunfrageldBafigeldbeechelde S • a ■ •
Landash-••DICoatr.Mittaltie
Lenk-zeltst ima 
Suhe- seltungen 
j x  ahror Beif...Rj-nah-Verlet
ICoatr.Mttelzta Be 
Lank- saltetlaau
Rvhe-saltogea
fkhrajBall.f t a f i -nahaaaAn* ./DMVarlet
Kcatr.Mittalate Be.
L«nk-B.ltitisauii
Buh«-llitgea
Tahrerlair.Mad-r.ahaaalns*/IMB.rl.l
Kontr.Mltt.l-st. Ba 
L.nk-**n•tin
••itangea
rahrerBair*rua-aekneaV.rl
Xa.tr.«m.ietste
tank-saltBeetle
ffahe-seltlauagea
rejertrBair.
A50 13r7 1679
3259629037788689625•3868869
B35»5 211i
20i193
839159112016 233131ft16
CB66639191161aiBiTrTn2967171087953ft
DDR«
6260Xa10
DK67as*72s625
1005212
89696tx1062?282131156367
E5222- -.  . . .  57 
111802669260768j6
F7<2668613626931
601609
67039067993831722ia6«921
FLI1117
3560292a6 3
GB11a
9660%2 19172
OR1 •---15
6nc88 «88
I15 321275
19796733S371229135236712
IR 1
660 1 11T)ber
trag2958*1615633920317
7m
1233239603166529072
.  ®2533%aJZS,307*
Aalege 3/1

OnlnunKawldrlftkciten-Verfahren nach dem Fah-rparaonalgesetagggen Aur-»artige
! ■  J a h re  1980
QUter- u. PcraonenkraftYerKehr TJnternehmer ___________
BU
 IC - 230Anlage 3/2Iinet«r.aBg/
BelehruacV ervirauofC B oboe VervarnuoraeeldYervzrnungea alt VervernunffsfteldBeBgeldbeechelde s ■  ■  ■  •
>&ndaen•erletx
f'ottr. Kit telte B e
L en k -zeitlU O D U
*uhe-jzeitngen
P & h rerSeif.*0-nah-
aetVerlet:
Kontr.Kittel.te B e x
Leak-zeittleaur
B uhe-zeltigen
Fahre:Belt.«o0- p.ehaen | A as./D HVerlet
Kontr.Kitteltte B e *
Leak-zelttlaaungea 
Suha- f «kr«r 
*alt p»i^«M .6-
neB aeaAaz./WVerlet
Keatr.Kittelzte B o
Loak-
»«it•tlaa
B tth e-
*«Itsngen
FahrerBelf,K aB -■■kaeaV « r
loatr.KittelL enk-a«ltB cet<
B uhe-seitta6iagea
FehrerSelf.
Ib er-
tra g 2 9 5 u« 166
1 56 3 » 2 D*
3c
" 17
160 7-/s:1909
1 2 3 9 2 3 96 0 3 1 6 6 5 2 9 0 72 2 2 7 6 5 3 3.  1 6 2 8 3 0 7 n
[fiL 2 23
txx 3 5 5
uH 1 1 5 1 2 13 7
2 0 9 6 C 2 5 2 5 1 1 53 3 6 a 1
i 7 3 6 13 *
1 2 5 6 51 5 2 3 6 3 6 3 a a 5■
N L 70 U K 6 1 6 66
80 2 273'
6 5 5 6 0 5 1 9 5 6 3 9 1 6 6 a 8 1 1 251 6 5 9 152 t
P1 1 1 1 16
1 7 0 0J 1 i 6 1 1
PL ■2
702 1 2*
a1
7®1 1 1
H SM1
6601 ‘
83 2 1.U
6 8 7 3 9 6 a a 7
s r 3 3 1• 2
1 0 0 0 1 1 1 5. 1 6 2
au6
«0 3 1 6 3 1
Uber-
tr a g 3 9 2 1 6 7 1 7 1 2 1 75 6 7 2 2 3 2t1
2 6 0 9 22 7 6 5
1 7 3 2 6 1 26 5 91 9 6 3 6 6 6 9 6 3 2 2 3 8 6 22 1 5 8 6 6 8 116

Ord"ungavidrlgkcitcn-Verfahren Bach den FahrpereoB&lgcsetz gegen Auswartige
la Jahre 1980
Q liter- a .  P erB o n en k raftv erk eh r D ntern eh aer
. r .:~.stallang/
SclehrueirV ervarnungen otna VervarnanitaeaidVtrw«rnun(«n alt VervarnQngsjtaldBu& galdbeechelda •  •  ■  ■  •
E»andM *  i- ari­sen•trial
Xontr..M ittalI 'f  Ee
L enk-r..itJt*aa
R uhe-i.ltjngeo
FahrerSelf.:ua-nah-seaVarlci
Koatr.Mittal:t« B e
L ank-saltStiM U
B uhe-
s«ltngea
I'ahrez
fid f.M a d -nahaan
A a  * ./ »Verlet
Kontr.Mittalsta B e
Leak-salttlaaun
R uhe-
Mltigea
FahrerBeif,M a^ -r.akaaa
A|t«/!MParlet
Eoatv•  Mittalsta B e
Leak-Saltattaa
fiu h a-j
saltingaa
P& hrer
Balf.Hefl-aak aer*»*rl
loatr.Klfct.latsta
Leak-saltBaatia
Puhe-saltw n^gea
Fahrer3elf.
TR59! i «m 21 % 73 67 22 j 2+l
260 9 22765
1732612 659 1963 666 96 3223 862 .2158 668 116
TO
111
5680 7 ‘ 6 1 12 7 6 1
8
67302____26 8 2 7 6
■  —
•
.
Sumoe
39317121 16 75 672?3 2n
260•WBtALWVI9 22766
1762822 668 1976 66! 96 3263 871 2169 673 116
BAO 1C - 270 Anlege 3/3

Ordnnng8widrlgkeiten-Verfahren nach dem Fahrperscnalgesetg gegcn A\^ -'Krtlgc
i n  J a h re  1980
OuterkraftTerkekr Pnternehner
5 *  r.st«ilur.g/ 
Bclehrun*’ /er^oroungen ohnt VervarnunpsgeldVcrw araungtn sit VervarnungareldBuBgeldbaachctda * •  a ■  •
L a n di-
cah-
■•aV*rl*t
*<ontr. MittalB e
L eck-taltat<aa
luhe-angen
FahrerSelf.:;*2-nah-oeoVerlet
Kontr•  Mittalzt* B e
Unk-aaitnti»ai
R ube-
witngen
> ‘ ahr*iBell.K afi- nabaca tcz./EKVerlet
Kontr.Mittalate B e
Lank-teltitlo*u
.R ube-aaitigen 
F ab  rar 
fetif.r.*a-
nabaeoA nt./C MVtrla
Kontr.Mittaltat* £
Leak-K it **ituagaa 
|Faarer 3*1 f.k*a-
oabatah r
Kontr.M tt.llllLtl
L «ak-»*it3eat<
3uba-salta»ui.g«o
Fabrar
B«.r.
A 69 13 5 7 1672
322962 68 373 86 67 536 53..380 86 68
B 35 30 5 21 11
20 1195
83915 91 135 16 233 123 126 H
CH 66 6 39 1 9 1161
35659 2 56 2 17 t » 7 95 3 26
DDR«
6260 10 t> 10
DK 67 20 60 7 2 7 5 26
8061 *
87596 96 T6 27 276 12: 156 36 2
E3 2 2 235
10780 23 6 6 29 2 58 6 6
F 7 < 26 68 6 136 26 9 31
60 1606
669670 67 952 83 1721 1* 609 92 2
FL11 117
3560 2 5 2 101. 6 3
GB T1V
5660 16 219 1i 2
GR 11 5
6 8 1 C8 8 «• :8
I133 2 1• " 7 7 1  
196607 33 232 71 2 290 35 233 71 2
IR»1
6* 1 1 1
tJber-
trag 29686163V 15 62*20 3 16
1606W9:
12258? 396 1659 287 71 2256 522 1622 30687
B A" IC - 2JOAnlage k/^

Ordnungsvidrigkei ten-Verfahre:: aach dcm Fabrparaoaalgcsat? ge.;ea Augv.  rtlge
in Jahre 19SO
Quterkraftvorkehr Pntcrnehaer
Zirstellung/
Belehrur.gV ervarnungen © h n *  VervamunraiteldV erw arnungen alt 1  BaageldbeeehM d* Verwarnunesgeld I8 (i ■  • •
Landrfaft-o»h-•en•tfrlet
Koatr. M U  telste B «
L e n k ~s*ltftt'ec
R tth * -s*ltungen
tahrer3«if.^afl-nah-
aenVeriet
Kontr.zte pc 
icttatleeu
R u fc e -Mltn g en
FahreiSelf.«*a-* \ahsen^f./XWVerlet
Kontr.Mittelate Be
I.enk-:eitt tau iu n
iuhe-ttltg< a 
rehrer iaaX  .*a3- nsheen■\nxjt*Verl.t
Kontr.hlttrlcte B «
Lenk-»*itet tee 
K u ie * J *«ltiegen
fehrerSelf.HeB-
•ahemVcrlttsie
Kontr.) L enC 'l Mittt-lj sett IRuh»-i^l k ,'r*p
1
Uber-
trag 2 9 6 8 61 6 3 16 1562 38 20 3 16
160 61 8 9 2
1 2 2 5 8 7 9 3 9 6 1 6 5 9 2 8 7 V 2 2 5 6 522 1 6 2 2 3 0 6 8 7
IRL2 23
1 0 0 0 3 5 5
L1 1 8 1 5 1 2 13 6
1 9 6 8 0 2 6 231 15033 2 612
M73V136
1256515236363n2753
NL70tt 1 8V1666
8022731
655605 195 6 3 9 1 6 320«n251 6 5 915?21
P111116
170031 6V21
PL2
702 22 .
R1
7201 11
RSM1
660 1 11
S321.15
687396 18117
SF531• 2
«0111 5. 162
SU6
18031 631
Uber
trag391 167 171? 11 6 7 6 6 6 22521 0rg) 822 7 2 5
1 7 2 3 7 7 2 669 1 9 5 566195 3 2 D O 8 3 02 1 5 0665 913
s*n ic -2JOAnlage k/H

Ordungswidrigkeaen-Vcrfahren n&ch dcm Fahrr ei sonalgecots gegsa rt i jzo
in Jahre 1980
Giiterkraftverkehr Unternehmer
Ilr.«tellur.g/ B.'etrjnr_Ve
rvamungea ohna VervarounKSReldVtrvarnungen sit Yervar&nnffs?eldBu3gc1dbaachei da S a • ■ • l
Landr.zi-tah-aer»cr.e:
Kontr.Mttal;te Be
lack-teltS t  <  f f . O l
Suhe- tel tir.gen
Fahret9aif.MaB-aah-r.enVerlct
Kcntr.Mittalzte Be
Leak-teltstltou
Rufce-£«ltr.gea
FahreiBpIX.MaO-nahscnAnx*/EMVerlct
lontr.Mittalzle Be
Lenk-saltitioovu
Ruhe-*©it\geo
FehrerBeif.HaB- |  Verla 
i«tr.
1txte B 
Lenic-estisa
jRuhe- |**< tu&geo 
iFahrer BaiX.KaO-eahseav«r
lootr.M'tteliatata
Leek-reitBeat*
Ruha-x*ttoaupctr
fahrerBaif.
Uber-
trag---1---i
3 9
1:  H 717121 1 6 7 3 3 6 2 2 3 21 0
m 822 7 2 5
1 7 2 3 7 2 2 6 3 91955 3 3 1 9 5 3 2 0 0 8 5 9 • 2 1 5 0 3 6 5 1 1 3
TH111
* 8 0 74 1 1 27 3 1
YU8
3 7 3 0 274 8 2 7 3
— -——
•.
*
SummeI
} i!!  1V7j nY 7* < 6 22 310
2 2D 8 22 7 3 3
1 7 3 3 9 8: 6 5 8 1 9 6 6 3 4 6 9 5 3 2 2 9859 2161 3 7 0H3
Anlage 4/5

O rdnttPgBvidrigkeiteD -V erffchren r.ach de>a i'ah; re rg o n a lg eset*  gegen Auswartig*
l a  J n h r . 19&0
P a r a o n c a k r a ftv rk e h r Dn ta rn a h aar
Elsatellang/
ftalehrurjtV ervarnungen ohna V arw arn u n rM T « l< JV erw aroungen sit Ververnunas**IdBafigeldbeachelde Su b. *
LandHa).
B ib*•#L» crlat
Kcntr.Mittalxte B
I  au k  
x«i*rst'BC
p ' :.ia- 
ecltungeo
f/ahreiBaif.Sa3-nah-■atoYerlet
K or.trMittalzte B e
L er.k -saitstlaav
R u h e-iaitogtt
'lakreBaif.M a & -r.ahaenAil./CHVerlet
KontrMjttalzte B e
Leak-
saltikluu
R uh«-xaitageo 
Fan re r fctii.r t aQ -rahaaaAnt./WVtrla
Kontr.Mittaltxta B
L eok-« itestlu
B uht-Mituefan 
iFairer Baif.K a & *
aahaeaV.r
Kontr.Hlttelletxta
L eak *xeitB «*t<
B uh«.x«ltuuagea
i'ibrarBaif.
A17
2 9 6 0 2 K 2 1 6 2•  V 2 1
D K 1 11a1
.1 9 0 $ 6 8 8
E2
too 1■1 2 1 1
ri
729 1•1 1
i1
1 3 6 01 1 1
L"W O1 2 3 1 2
»
%
.
-
Sujia^ ^j 1 1___1
n 12 D
68V ) 83 1 7 3 12 > 3 1
t*3 It - 2JO Aniage 5

Ordnongsvi dri Rkeiten-V grf aV.rfrr.  nach der, 1 ai.i ?•?rsci  aigeawtE r.« -  ^
im Jahre *1930
OUtar- n. Peraoneakraftyerkehr Tahrparaonal
=.'i- e l i t n s / /ervarnurg*
Verv^rru r.rrn cfcr.e 
re liVerwarnungen t l t  
Vervarnur.rGRe’ d7.uCgeldoer.che * dt 6 U  9C  <
LandKft.V
rch-
z t z .r;cr. * .  .* • 
M ittelL.**v 
ü l  * .C T .
M -:?-.t-r.^en
F .- *  -rt -  
str?A- 
ke •*.cc-
-®h*r.tnVc/iet
Xortr.
K ittelt e Z »  
:e itsti=ru
S r..-
i t i t•*«> *
Falr.rt*
s tre i­
keM fc3 -
rahse^
* ü ./W->räet 
Xvntr. 
K itteli ‘  J St
Ler.'<-
xeitie'.C- 
I* t•J*.
Fahrt-
•trek-
keneheen
Ans./i*’j  V * r1«
Xoatr.
Mitteltat» 2
Lenk-
t» lt« itla .
Ruht-
«1»^.i£ec
i  Fairt- 
ctrek- 
k el K,.i-
ftt^aesVcr
lontr«
K ittellW:.a-.1*i *uhe* 
‘  te lt
iC *U 9fc!L
j'"*" -| a t t »i> 
{k.
«
Z8A  j 96 80 » 6 23071
61620 2012 791 2683660
753650 2529 »98 667 80 6893 6621•  1
«99j 761I
t r
AFG1
29 12
300 2 3 3!
i
iA L  j  !2
V O 22
3002•6 6
,
:  A nd~r.1
150 1- 1 1I
I
B129 W7 2B 10 6 5 11957
59130 1079 660 2181183
261723 858 620 186 3 3273 206? 1« 612 J
BG7............
~ T _ “96
16» 91 327
5650 16 15 2 131 « 5 18 2
j CH
u i - lT T► •  — ■ — .  
122 5 5 •389
77»r ~
216 166 27272
70232 23 198 71 67 .  639 266 >19
—V o 6»
; c s
5■'  r36
6» 29j , .21
2570 U 6 1 60 63 9 3
i- •  -
(C T—r —
“ ........ r1
250 1 1 1
r “ ‘
!  d o t 6--------- 1-
*i------- 1--------
ii
iT--------
-
11 1106
2080 90 1621
1370 23 7 137 T » 21
|dk 65— i—  
511  15r -
1,
*.627
125201590 179 539 »
201073 68? 573 181 2 1726 m 579 263 3
12—
•— i------- 1
1—-
6 “r 139
7780 1309171
286» 167 16 7 7 328 291 2 6 • 7
J  U b e r j 
!  t r a g '  512 170
1?°.« i . 2180J *2!) 2661« 
128 > V j
•- »60t'’ s?r
r • •  . 1613&
1285678 6103 2331 913 139
»«l i t t :13266 8651 63011 155|
••••■* •*a>ai163J

Ordnungawidrigkelten-Verf'--~rT. nach dca Fahrp»rs~t;:alge8eta gegt^
la Jahre 19&3
Guter- u. Pefaonenkraftverkehr Fahrparaocal
?el*hru»KVervaraungen ohne Versarr.unrseeldVervarnungen ait VervernungsgeldBu&geldbeechelle S  u a a e
LandM ci-aah-aeaV  drict
Kcctr.Mittelcte E t
letk-:eits;icai
?-u h e-teituagea
Fahrt-strefekeX a & -zafc-aenVerl«i
Kor.tr.Kltt.ltte B e
L erjc-
tftitstlasu
Sube­d itn g en
F*hrt-•trekIreX afl-oahaeaA aa./B KVerlet
Kontr.Mittelr.e bei
Unk-telttisX U A
a-ihe-teitK * n
Fahrt-
•trek-kiM * 3 -
nahstsAn»./«Veriet
Koatr.Mittelate B e
Leak-*«ltatlaai
B uha-aajtiageo
Fahrt-atrek*f c eH eJ-aabaeaV eri
loctr.MittelItltl
Leak-•elta-jbe-selteuagea
Babrt-fttrek-ke
tJber-
trag5121709819218013817 a26918
128590909C18055736136
1285978 9*323319131391329689519201155193
rzz9881319919972*911207
2916097?5911371080
339795367757*9 12605100919953593
k17
390123215
3090?9793215719
GBi?*1 11«9
3280tJ551187
160597322a126919579161
SR39 99975
95003915529965
881773857999 9837851873
[1 .21
9201837
10507 8Z3|--------
i
!i
.166 302553980
69600172B12879652796
551685181181739696922356921098 19
IB1510032■ 16 
2890161 8 83
|IRL11fl
2206525
50*199 37 a19
i
!jor
IKTI
I9
83311
3502 1751 t
1
1i
30C2 22
—
**1 .5 632168
TfcO332312u
139a30 a . 1266856 a
Uber-
tragn -4
960!  zn1856!5520^ a a« 9296aoaii9025a  n**31 > A >11**3
.. z r w6816t a£38261226■tstaa 8 8 8 8 8 * 1*631
25072Z 88888 8 8 :681890931592150237801915980922861156
tao : Anlaga G/2

Ordnungawidriftkeiten-Ver fahren n&ch dea FaV., >.ersor slgcsetz gey>a Adorer*!ge
la Jahre 19&0
G u t e r -  o .  P e r B o n e n k r a f t v e r k e h r  P a h r p « r B o n « l
Ii rts 
Be !« •t.liu a g / |ver* 
ar*jn* i»*ervaroungen otae 
arnunRageldVervarnur.gen a lt 
VervarnunrajteldBuafeldbeschtiM I * u a a •
-L a n d  
1______aa
h-
reaKentr. Le^;-.? - e -
i•agea
Fahrt 
si reta­
kepao-
jnah-
laeaverlet
Kcntr.
Kitteaate s«
Lenk-
ra ltitlz r .
S-he-
xeltJig* a 
4  Fehrt 
strek 
ktM aB -
aahcenln t./V HVerletzte Be
KoatrJ Leck- 
Mittelj sa ltstlaau
Hube-
xeltagea
Fahrt-
atrek-
keHafl-
nabaenVarle
Soatr.
B fttelt*t» E
Ltnk-
u l t• ttlai
Sub*tungea
■ F airt- 
•trek- 
keK*a-
cabaec— sr,
Koxtr
KttteJii:> t
task
H itScat 
Bah«- 
Ml taauagea 
•  Fahrt- 
atrak-
U b e r
t r a g 9 6 C 277 W3 66 3520 268 60 s 31 1 3 7 1
2376006816 3826 122610630
23072276818 6O65156? 150 23780 16159 8097 2861 156
L ib  ai [1
9 1 1 1
M1
20 12
600 1 1 3 2 1
MC1
200 1 1 1"
N
3 2 1 1 2130
2760 99 31 a.176
3& 661 126 53 12 6 V f 229 85 2 1 6
lfL555 2211  ■ 1  ■96 69 550 67 63637
72760 1*57 1665 523228f
523*5 1665 895 287 26 6306 3570 2660 659 31
P I
A  ia
360 23 517
2750 15J 67 38 9 1
PL* * 2 219
380 % 3a
380 7 6 6 33 29 7 6
B
___5‘ 20 
600 2023
6950 22 3«62 3
BSM
J•2
60 1 .15
680 6 1 1 5 1 1
S8____ I 1 1156
3880 166 22 890
15273 63 2! 612 9 1 235 50 16 1
i
SF1 1 1 185
1700 68 15 166
7660 30 t 6 2 W 100 32 5 2
U b e r
t r a g i'1516 5 12! 253! fW 8376 301 25 315996
311080 9065 5369 1566113285
2895076 1533 5061 1856 183 3 0 9 6 <-------- 1--------
18
6ll]10760 3566 196
Anl«g* 6/J

OrdnungswldriRkelten-Vcrfah; ea nach dfia Fahrperscr.algesetz s*g*
Is Jahre 1 9 8 0
Oliter- a. Personenkraftvarkehr Fahrpersonal
S ln o tflictg /
3elehrunrVervaraungea ohoi 1  Yervaraungea a lt 
tf*rv*rr.on*sreld 1  VervantuagageldBaftgeldbtfehtU* & u m a •
LandKaA-
a»a-
reolVeriet 
JKc«tr .
tr : t 2
Lec<-
zei:u tirn a
feu'ae-
zelt•-aj«a
Tttirt- 
l t r i >  
ke •>.a2-
aeaVcrlet
Kcatr.
Mitielzte B «
L«nb-
zeltStlKS'J
ficke-
*#itngea
Fahrt-
•trek
keM aA -
aakcea
ilas ./CMVerlet
Koetr.
M ittalste Be
I«tk-
• • ltgtiaau
P.uhe*
se lt6|81
Pokrt-
•trak-
keH*A -
BihMB
Aaa./SKV .ri.
lo n tr.
M ltt.ltst« 1
teak-
»*ltKstlsa
2uh«-
SOltuagea
Tatrt-
atrek-
k*jua*
aakaeaV«r
itoatr.
MittalLekste
teak-
seltf eatii
Cuke*
sa ltwuagaa
la k rt-
atrek-
k#
tf b e r
t r a g 13* 512mTO 8376 3»1 u5 315996
519883 9065 5369 156613285
2895076 8533 5366 1856 « 3 33969 18611 10760 3566 196
8  IB l 2 23
60 39
650 6 9 9
SU 2 2' 26 
680 22 213
695 13 2 a 37 2 2
TH ■1
a 1 1 1 .
TB27 5 5281
56S 250 8 V368
580803D a 6681 605 66 U
i  to • 16 «612
8260 315 62 35221
61035 176 66 a 655 69! DS 66
I
i
11•
t
1
tn399l«(S(3 2 D»
.J  - I16715
9656Si. r2lm ,so e13891
9076
•aaaasi5H0 1893 ■  ■  - ■ ■« 3 32356
2«at*a*aai19562SS«B»SI1089• • • ■•196S u m » * W | 512 j TO TO! »ix;ii.xn;r • •as: *2M«aaac»ia(J595336isasca:
3A0 IC - 230
Anlage 6/k

OrdnunKswidrigkeiten-Verfahrfei. each gem Fahrrcrsoaa'.^t.--:i setter .  ^ ■  <  ■
ia Jahre 19&Q
OUterkraftverK*hr Fahrpersonal
T.ir.ittllvzg/  Bel eh T xr.xVervaro’ -;:gar, o fc r.a  Vervamun dYarvarnungen Bit Vcrvarnuttgs^aldBnfif'ildotichf 1  d« 3 <1 ■ ■ •
Landn*i-Scatr.UntilX 3
L anksaltect'ic
-nuht- saltr*hrt•tn*k«KO-nah-saaVarlai
XoatrHitt*]ZX« £
L ank-salt.atlxe
saltAges
*  Fahrt •trak kn.h a A -
sahaaa
AuVl«Vtrla
KontrHitt#txte 5a
. Lank- 
l salea t isav.
2-iha-salt& fea
Fahrt-atrak-kaK att-cahsrnAns./»V « ri<
XoatrNitta]tm
Link-
saltaal if 
R u h a  
talljungaa
•  Fahrt- atrtk- kaK a£-aahaaiv«
KcntrHlttarlatxt
L an ksalta Bast
- inha ta|timcdagta
- Fafcrt- 
•trak*
A 2 8 6 9 6 78 1 0 6 2— 5(02 
727515 2293 10?6W» 3782 2371 1105 672 82
APSi2
300 2 2 2
AL1t2
3002 2 2
i  And
—'
—.  -1
■  150 111
B129 m 28« 1 3 11
a1TB3
261723 «5? 6a«6 3 1317 9 6 9 669 196 3
B6-
7 *2 7
5650K15 2 37H“5 2
CR
( 2 12 1 6’162 7 1
70132 22 198 71 67 2 98a203 > 9 66
CS i  16*
2 2 7 C12 6 1 2311 1
1
CY !t1
n111
DOS6 6 1 1a
13a23 7 33 a 7
DK 65 5 1 15616663J69
1380 6261973
199073 676 373181 2 1153 830 397 186 3
£
_ _ _ L12
i■i5 1 6 6162
27160 138 16 7 7 -no 152 178 7
0ber4
trag i  511 1701 68
: i c : t  t : m . :19 2
a  » : t :177'i a a a a a a A17a
i i a j i. . . iTO
1600
la M a B a i63 6 1.1275693 6060 23289 U 139 6829 6608 2399
• ■ • ■ s  1952
. « 2
Tc - 2J3 ‘  Anlage 7/1

Ordnungswidrigkgiten- Yfrff'~.’‘ea naeh deni Fahri-crc-ora 1 jrer=c t z g-'/;^n Au«-«
in Jahre 1980
Qttterkraftverkehr FahrperBonsl
~in]t*lluaE/ jvervarnungea ofcaa B»l»hrur.» Ivtr varr.ur.irjircliVtrvarnungtn *lt V#rvsrnur#r7#ldBa&gcl4b##ch«14# t u a a • v
1
Landn*5-n%h-a*nj»er.#
Z f i f i t r .Ni:t*2it# 9
)2-±a*sellsmUzz  
-Ssh#-Z#ltjr.hrt strek- k# •[ilj*ja&h-J.C2;erle; 
Kc-tr.Hitt*]St# i > «
|  Lenk- I  reltaiixaj 
•  Sa.- ><ltui£#&
Ftfart*•trekk#aahcts Anr./LMVcrle
£oatrMjtt#]Zt# 3* 
L*nk-til;r.; .iaw 
2uh#- :«itrjen
Fahrt-itr*k-k#M*3-rthaeaAx>z«/EttVarla
Kaatr.HittcXtit# B
U»k-icit••tlai
*oi»-s»ltk tt*C#D
Fi&rt-•tr#k-k#K*Q-B*ka#aV«r
lontr.Jtitt.llcit« B#*t<
l#ek-l 2uh«- *#it 1  i#ittauofta
Tahrt-str#k-k*tlber-
trag5tlw481?217713517a270
•w o o6361607T
127569340402328912139(8294401239995?143
Tm879
1_32__2116t12
6
021076
339145364757«1*945249042213
FL15
3090347415?474
OBV«i 1187
*0347322 81*59023 81
OBy > 99456
869273767444 4993857444
H1 •7
*507 87
iI166 30552733
549003*0081539642929*25sa3964
IB1«
2890161 17«i
i
XBLi1125
50*199 26 a9
JOB •3
3902 132 .1
!kt1 _ . !2
3002 22
162jI 6 52144
1241029255 ?4?4 y6
Uber-j 
trag !  958j276■B366J
3i 516 244i
V)| 25 372
14606561~~W !T
2919026731403515401501188173*42641634156
kao ic - jjc A alage 7 /2

O rd r.'iK K s v io i V. !. u - u - \ :€ r :‘ ^ * ~ g ^J ' -  '■'- :.~  '  jr_ ^ __f _'A.' r_ J
ia
 Jahre "\9bd
GiiterkraCtverkehr Fahrpersonal
1 -. .  / 1 l it.s' •  i*”  * J\ 3c'. * } ; •Vtrwarr.-r.fea okra V p  rvr rv.'irsre*4Y arvarr.ungen ait Varvari:.ir.?s*eidB??.Stlcbasca«ld« S u a e *
11
;-Landsah-seaj er* it
: <  =  Ltr. • l it telzte 3t
|Usk-:eit& U Z 2 .
!*■*•-Z 4 itucgea
FahristrainV .a* - i  j- nis-j’ .erlc'
jxistr.sic ©sstian^ngea
3-jka-j F a art* seit |salt | atrtk l  I  k»M a 3 -
s& kr.eaAss ./IKV erle*
KoatrHittelste B e
Usk-zclte -t In^u
R uha-u ltagen
Fahrt-
sirak-kaKsS-
r.tkaos•/ ^Verie
Koatr.Mittaltzte £
Lank-salt*stlu
3 u a # <
witsur.gea
Fa& rt*alrak-keJU3-tAiaanV .l
KostrHitt.)■latsta Beat!
Leak*!  R uhe- s«it saltasjegn
I  Fahrt- atraic- ka
Uber-
trag 9 5 8 2 7 5 1 8 3 68 33 1 6 2 4 4 4 0 2 5 372
1460 65 6 110535
22919026731 4o?5 1540 150 11881 7316 42 6 1 1634 156
Liboi1
1 5 01 1 1
M2
4 0 01•  1 2 1 1•
N3 3 1 1 2 24
8 0 4175
32311125 53 1 3 4 184 133 54 13 4
KL
1 m 22C96 69549 46 4*
3380 93 7592277
522215 1441 892 287 26 2827 1800 1067 345 31
!  pi2 2 116
260014 2 « 14 4 1
PL 2 4 . 2 210
380 7 4 4 14 13 4 4
R5«
4950 2 2 3 9 22 3
RSK>
680 4 1 5 4
J_ _ _ _ _ _% 1
8 1  8 7 1 1 14
80486
14723___a 27 6 1 9
9•  719 6t
W  j  1 1 1 141
6690 26 15 4 2 432t 15 4 2
'
SIR 2 24
6504 6 C
Ober-
trag
-12111
28.-!T  '  
11? L  .8 .372 44 524?
_J66 8113175
2877651
Aiiaits8435
tit»?*i5032 1854 15108 9 4 0 < 5440 2 D 0 3
.....194
b a g ic - .  . . •  Anlage 7/3

Ordnur.gswidriKkeiten-Verfahren r.ach deai FahrpersonalgPset 2 gegen Auswärtig*
ia Jahre 1960
Güterkraftverkehr Fahrperaonal
I
|X ir.sz sll jr.z/
Selchrur.g _  _ _  _V'erwzrruRgc.n oh.-.e 
V erviraur.rA celd^•rvam ungen s i t 
Verv3rnttarf.-*Mld3uig*idheachei i » S a a s «
·! -  -  i f
j LandKai-4A £-
• e au ; l * t
X ontr. 
K i t t · !zKt 3
LdrJt-
z e iteztJ e r .r.jen 
n i t  je trth ·Ifc·'*·£.»-
n.vi-
renY erlat
K c -tr·
K i t t · !zte ie  
1  Ler.k- 
z « lta t l a s .
Ruh··
z e itT ihrt-
6trcz-
k«X*3- · 
naJisen 
Aaz,/£S</e r l e t  
K ontr. 
K itt« !zzt 3e
Lenk­
z e itBti&TUI
Ruhe­
z e i t4gca
F * trt-
• tr e k -
ke.* ? z ü -
L«b««nAa*./»Verle
K oatr·
K itte ltz te  B  
L«nk- 
« i t( U te s
Sak·-
M «tungen
r ü h rt- 
s tre k - 
keKeJU
oahaeaVor
K oatr.
X ltto lLetzte
Lenk­
z e itBest«!
Buhe-
M ittsuagca
f u h rt-
e tr e k -
ke
über
tra g 1511t-------
; » 2
8 31H 8573 298 4 4 25 5»9
5000166 81 101JT 7 5
»77651 84J5 5032 1854 163 15t» 9409 5440 2008 194
SD 2 213
495 1J 2 15 15 2
TB27 5 5368
58080 350 20 6 400 355 2 06
YD• 14220
40835 174 45 2! 242 «4 4 5 29
.
s
I
.
I
I1—I
------------1 --------
1
Su
mmet 1 3 ^ )6
i.·»  i c u a L s t t c :510 285 119! 8394 3 1 5
««•IST4 4. . . S . . . . j ___sJ10a«b.e>13776
2737961 „ m .5M7 . m . „ . Ä 3 . . J 8 Ö.5555 . ? « d a a a lf ti
IC - Anlage 7/4Annexe 5.7.4

Ordnungs-wi drigkei ten-Ver f ahr er. each dem Fahrptraonalgesf ta: gegen >iiii>jrtite
i a  J a h r e  1 9 8 0
Peraonenkraftverkehr Fahrpersonal
r ·  ■
"iüatel'ur.S/'
3el.-hr-.rirVervarrungea ohne
V  o r V  a  rr. u  r . *r. sei dYerver&Lngea Alt 
Yeruerr.unn^eldBungel dheechelde S u a·«
!1
LandEäl-
sca(»er.et
l-cr.tr.
Mut«:xte ΰ-
iLtrk-
zeitN e ­
teltΛ
Fahrt
strak­
ke:'.c£-
iah-
:e iKor.tr·
Kittel::e ìjC
Lenk­
zeitsticau
Ruhe­
zeitngea
j Fahrt-  
strek  
keK*3-
aehzen
.'JI./ÏÏI  Perlet  
r.
Mittelite i 3
LenJi-  
tei tst lc:.i
»ihe-
xeitigen
Fzhrt-
•trek-
ke*a3-
-thoer.
Aax·/Verl«
Koutr.
Kitteltzte B
Leuk-
**iteetlet
R uhe
« i ttuagec
Fahrt-
strak­
keKeû-
s&haeaVerletzt«
Xeatr·!Leak·  
Kittelt zeitt Seatiaauagea
•  Kube-I Fährt-  
zeit letrek·
I  Va
U
!2 238
6135 3 6 3 1 60 3t .3 1
CR1 11
100 1 2
c s'2
5“2 5 2
DK 1
1V
10 2 215
20001Î19 17 2
i
E i5
1250 !« 9
i *11 1 1 1\
600 141 617 1
GR. . <
1250 9 9
I13
268t 11 2 l ì11 2
L6
WC 1 3 61 3
NC •1
200 1 1 1
N1
15t 1 1 1
NL 1 1 1 11
20 1Ì
9 5 0 6 3 « 6 6
tib e r -j  
t r a g  ^  3 2
. J55
100 2
X a^ ■ ·.310t
*62! 93 11 2 117 102
. J !2
e a d :c - ?}0
Aùiege 3/1

Ordnunftewldrigitei te n - Verfah. tec Fa: r persor.* l^ e s e tz so; - · >r_'*£e
i c  J a h re  19&0
Peraonenkr& ftvtrkehr Fahi pertiiaal
! · '. -ZL-r.  :er. oh;:»
___________K - r ^ r ^ - a l d  _ Ί_  ** i- 
aur.ta
A as./»»roråg·»
... JSues·
!  Land  
î-j. ■  —»  · ».
U p :
!
J! ?: ·: ·'-  
u t;
—s .r .,  
1 - .·;  ·■  1 
~F.or.tr.
Mitt*:i t ·  ;v  
X ·. * t/.iS U
3ck ·-  
s ,ltr*hr:-
k*Koner.  
Hitt·'.: irx.r
?!>·-  
i t It<*-
Fohrt-
•trtk'
k·A=;./a.Varl«?
lù z tr .
KUtolt : · 3«  
1 ank-
=  *itotls»*
3uh·-
« i t■Bl*:
atro/.·
k#y.ti-
au«t:Vari
Kofctr.l
Hittal«  late  
Lark*  
»•It2*1' < c
Λ " ι ί  Î X  # ·
»«it»ungati  
F  »trt-  
«tr*k-  
k«r ilb e r  
j t r a g 1
—5 55
K» 2 3K A
16425 93 11 2 117 102 i4 21
1  p 1  
1 _1
1 5 D 11 1
u4
550 44 4
1
SF5
750 4 15 4 1
i
TO
L  —1
200 1 1 1
-
i
1
.1
j
•
!  i
!
i1— — ——'1 1 5
18275-
•Suirm*-
.....1 . .5.
' 5
no 2 3 102 13 128 16 2
’ tc - < 7 - ■ - --·
Ani «3e ε.

Annex 6 .1 .
N E T H E R L A N D  Infringements by country of origin
Art. B D K D U K F IR L I LNon-member
countries
7.1 32 7 17 - 12- 30- 2
7.2/3 40 15 57 1 16 1 28 6 7
7.4. - - - - - - - - -
11.1 54 16 54 1 18 1 2 1 - 6
11.2 - - - - - - - - -
11.4 - - - - - - - - -
1 2 - - - - - - - - -
14.1 2 - - - - - - - -
14.2 - - - - - - - - -
14.4/16 68 10 93 10 4 8 54 2 9
15.1 - - - - - - - - -
15.5 — • — — —
Tota L 196 48 221 12 50 10 133 8 2 4

Annex 6.2
N E T H E R L A N D S  Total number of official reports drawn up and amount of penalties
for goods and passenger transport operations, broken down by nationality:
C O U N T R Y Offical report Infringements Penalties Inc ludi ng:
N E T H E R L A N D S 11.101 41039 2.336.205 386 cases in which no actio 
taken
B E L G IU M77 196 1.75037 cases in which no action taken
3 1  cases transferred
D E N M A R K20 48—19 cases in which no actior 
taken
1  case transferred
F E D E R A L  R E P U B L IC  
O F  G E R M A N Y6 1 221 9005 1  cases in which no actior 
taken
3 cases transferred
U N IT E D  K I N G D O M 4 12 500 3 cases in which no action 
taken
F R A N C E23 50—17 cases in which no actior taken
6 cases transferred
IR E L A N D 3 10—3 cases in which no action 
taken
IT A L Y 16 133—15 cases in which no actior taken
1  case transferred
L U X E M B O U R G 1 2—1  case in which no action 
taken _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __j
N O
N - M E M B E R
C O U N T R IE S8 24 200iI
7  cases transferred
T O T A L11.314 · 41.735 2.339.555539 cases in which no actior taken
42 cases transferred to the 
foreign authorities 
responsible

Annex 7
FR A N C E Roadside check
1  N a tio n a lity  1  Number of infringements  
l I detected
!  !l
j Number of infringement  
• f o r  which o ff ic ia l  
j report made out
1  France j 
!  I109.602 j 91.399 
!
•  Federal Republic · 466 | 346
. of Germany .
!
I I
!  !
J Belgium | 888i
!
! 731 
t
:  Denmark , 20! 18
J  United Kingdom j 
1  1492 [ 204
•  Netherlands i 
I  t368 ! 209 
!
1  1
'  Luxembourg J 55 I 28 
!
l 1
I Ita ly  | 1.505I
I 1.188 
l
1  1
!  Ireland ! 
!  !49"  lJ .  29
i I
j Non-member countries 1.138 | 871
j T O T A L  | 114.613 J 95.023 
!

Annex 8
ITALY
In frin g e m e n ts  d e te c te d  in  1980:
R e g u latio n (EEC) No 5 43 /69
In frin g e m en t Goods tra n s p o rt Passenger tra n s p o rt TOTAL
n a tio n a lsf o r e i ­
gnersn a tio n a l, f o r e i ­
g n e rsre q u la r o c c a s io n al
A rt 5 3.2 9 2 596 5 .1 1 8 46 410 1 .2 6 3 10.725
Ar t 6 2.7 3 0 168 79 36 4 - 3.017
A rt 7 - 8 10.362 283 224 101 23 11 11.004
A rt 11 - 12 5 .4 4 9 492 201 31 6 - 6.179
A rt 14 - 15 85.631 9 .2 6 0 862 53 284 57 96.147
107.464 10.799 6 .4 8 4 267 727 1.331 127.072
======= ======== :=== =========== ========= ========J ======== =  === = = = =
IIItIIIIIIIIIIII»

Annex 9.1.
FRANCE
A) Checks a t o p e ra to rs ' p re m is e s :  
1) O v e ra ll in d ic a to r s :
Number o f crews checked 41.045
Number o f d is c s  an alyzed  (1 )
= No o f days o f tra n s p o rt o p e ra tio n s 492 .546
Number o f in frin g e m e n ts  d e te c te d  (2 ) 363 .432
Number o f in frin g e m e n ts  on which  
a c tio n  taken 91.710
(1 ) T o ta l number o f d is c s  an alyzed  m anually by th e F acto ry In s p ec to rs  
(T ra n s p o rt) and th e two a n a ly s is  cen ters (SABINE)
(2 ) In c lu d in g  s e le c to r s w itc h in g  e rro rs
2) Breakdown o f in frin g e m e n ts  o f R e g u latio n  (EEC) No 5 43 /69
Exceeding maximum d r iv in g  
p e rio dContinuous 22.290
D a ily 4 4.7 10
Weekly 4.9 3 5
Over 14 days 2 .6 9 6
t
In ad eq u ate o r no d a ily  re s t p e rio d72.8 99
TOTAL 147.530

Annex 9 .2 .
FRANCE
3 . Breakdown o f in frin g e m e n ts  o f R e g u latio n  (EEC) No 1 46 3 /7 0
F a ilu re  to  keep d iscs 4061
Use o f u n s u ita b le  o r non-approved d is cs 2155
'' ·  -  T V  ·
Incom plete d ata on record sheets -c e n tr e  o f  
d iscs not f i l l e d  in5850
S e le c to r s w itch in g  e r r o r  ■203836
TOTAL 215902
B) Roadside checks:
Number o f crews checked :639 846
Number o f d iscs an alyzed  = number o f days o f  
tra n s p o rt o p e ra tio n s  checked :2 .1 4 0  653
Number o f in frin g e m e n ts  d e te c te d  : 114 613
Number o f in frin g e m e n ts  on which a c tio n  taken  : 95 023 ,

Annex 9.3
P e n a ltie s  imposed by th e  co u rts  in  1980
Fines
Amount (FF) Number %
Less than FF 40 4 .2 8 0 16,1 %
FF 41 to  FF 100 8.8 7 2 3 3 ,5  %
FF 101 to  FF 160 4 .9 6 9 1 8,7  %
FF 161 to  FF 220 4 .4 9 2 17 V.
more than FF 220 3 .8 9 8 1 4,7  V.
26.481 100 %
(1 ) A c tio n  taken  on o f f i c i a l  re p o rts  drawn up by th e F actory  
In s p e c to rs  (T ra n s p o rt) and Road T r a f f ic  C o n tr o lle r s . The  
a c tio n  taken  on o f f i c i a l  re p o rts  drawn up by o th e r in s p ec to rs  
(p o lic e /g e n d a rm e rie s ) is  not known.

Annex 10
UNITED KINGDOM
V e h ic le s  in sp ected  (goods and p a s s e n g e r), broken down by n a t io n a lit y :
UK B D DK•
F I IR L L
"199.775 169 506 308 913 113 1365 .
U ^ -NL ImemGer  icount r
13T8T75ATOTAL
2 0 5 .2 9 2
In frin g e m en ts  d e te c te d :
Articles UK BDDKFIIRLL•
NLnon-membecount;_total
Art 6 U $ 0 kn- - --- - - --- -
Art 7»1 310 ------ - -■  - 310
Art 7*2/4
1381 1 —•  -■ 7 h19-31H16
Art 8 102 - -23-u--1 112
Art 11 8911 11212- 21119
Art 12 39------- --.  39
Art 11+1
2811+ 2 12216713113003
Art.14.25099 1119172»2275Z13
Art.14.3159 -- --- - -159
Art 15.1
1 - - - - ' —1
Art.15.2- -- ' -  - - - - - 2 2
TOTAL9 9 9 4 52h32 927411043 10374

A nnex 11.1
Denmark Infringements and penalties imposed on employer 
in connection with Regulation (EEC) N o  543/69 in 1980
~  -- - - - - - -«.^Nature of in fri-
Pe
nalty ' :Article
7Article
111Article
14Article
151- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ar
ticles 
7  and^1- )Tota l
Employers
Written warning0 1 0 0 0 1
Fine of D K R  200 0 0 0 1 0 .  1
300 0 0 1 0 0 1  .
500 0 1 0 0 0 1
600 1 3 2 1 1 0 2 6
750 0 0 1 0 0 1
800 0 1 0 0 0 1
1000 0 ■  4 0 0 4 8
1200 0 1 0 0 2 3
1500
■1 3 0 0 0I
4  i
i
2000 0 2 0 0 8 1 0  j  
I
3000.0 0 0 0 0 1 1  !
1i
. T O T A L  N U M B E R  O F  
O P E R A T O R S2 16 23 2 15----------------- 1
j
5 8
■
 1 -.1

Annex 11.2.
D E N M A R K  Infringements and penalties imposed on drivers in connection
with Regulation (EEC) No 543/69 in 1980
^  -Nature of in fri- 
Penalty ' ~  ngementArticle
7Article 
111Article
14Article
15Art i cles 
7 and 11^.  Total
Drivers·...
Written.warning 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fine of D K R  200 0 3 5 1 4 13
t:- 250 0 0 1 0 0 1
‘  300 0 4 > 1 0 ■  7  ■ 12
400 0 0 ’l 0 3 4
500 0 2 , 0 0 7 9
600 1 0 0 6 10
1000 0 0 0 0 2
·:< * .; .  
T O T A L  N U M B E R  O F  
D R IV E R S 1 14 8 1  ’ 2 5 1
. „ s .
T O T A L  N U M B E R  O F  
D R IV E R S  A N D  O P E R A T O R 3  330; U ; ·31 3 42: . v r  _  .
109 :'l

Annex 11.3.
U N IT E D  K I N G D O M  Penalties
ArticleOral
warningsWritten
warnings ImmobilizationCases
prosecutedTotal
fines
A rt. 6 - - -
A rt. 7.1 13 209 - 741
j
7 .2 /3  
A rt. 840 762 
1132
7566
90i
!
>33.528
A rt. 11 3 4 23 77
A rt. 12 — 19 “ 2 1
J
A rt. 14.6 428 223 193 1374
14.8 715 1025 80 3226. 1  84.538
14.7 2 92
J44
T O T A L 1201 J 2345I
335 t5472!218.066