ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(81)288
Vol.1981/0094

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement (CEE,Euratom) n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernant l'ouverture aupublicdesarchiveshistoriques delaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique (JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement (CE,Euratom) n°1700/2003 du22septembre 2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003, p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiés présentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation (EEC,Euratom) No354/83of1February 1983
concerning theopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropean Economic
Community andtheEuropean AtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983, p.1),as
amended byRegulation (EC,Euratom) No1700/2003 of22September 2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003, p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary, classified documents inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformity withArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung (EWG,Euratom) Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar 1983überdieFreigabe derhistorischen Archive derEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom) Nr.1700/2003 vom22.September 2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003, S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit
erforderlich, wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenannten Verordnung freigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COM(81)288 final
Brussels .5June1981
Proposal fora
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC)
layingdowngeneralrulesforapplying thedifferential levyonraw
preferential sugar
•.Proposal fora
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC)
layingdowngeneralrulesconcerning thesystemofminimumstocksin
thesugarsector
Proposal fora
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC)
layingdownmeasures forthemarketing ofsugarproduced inthe
Frenchoverseas departments
(submitted totheCouncil bytheCommission )sion)«T>^V"■PV
Γ
C0M(81)288final

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1fInthenewbasicsugarregulation ,whichwiltapplyfrom1July1981,provision
ismadeforadegressive ,differential chargetobemadeduringthemarketing
years1981/82to1983/84onrawpreferential sugarwhenitisrefinedina
production unitotherthanarefinery .
2.Differential charges Werefirstintroduced inNovember 1975.Sincethatdate
theCouncil hasannually agreedthatthesechargesshallnotapplytoaquantity
.ofrawpreferential sugarrefinedinIreland uptoamaximumquantity of
30000tonnes(whitevalue)ineachyear.
3.Initscompromise proposals submitted totheCouncilduringitssession on30/31March
1981theCommission saidthatfor1981/82.andsubsequent yearsitwas.
prepared toproposethataquantity ofupto150000tonnesshouldbeexempt
fromthesecharges.Accordingly ,itisproposedthatinth'ecaseofIreland,
andforthesamereasons asinthepast,theexemption shouldcontinue during
thethreemarketing yearsmentioned aboveuptoamaximumquantity ineachyear
of30000tonnes (whitevalue).
/ , -
4.Inthecase'ofItaly,itisreasonable tosupposethatinanormalcropyear
t
therewillbeasmallsugardeficitinItalyoftheorderof40000to
50000tonnes.Itistherefore proposed thatexemption fromthedifferential
chargeshouldapplytoItalyduringthesamethreemarketing yearsuptoa
maximumquantity ineachyearof50000tonnes(whitevalue).
Financial implications
Theseproposals havenofinancial implications otherthanthosetakeninto
accpuntintheformulation oftheproposalsfora'newsugarregimeapplicable
from1July1981(docCOM(80)53finalof30September 1980)
\

Proposal for a
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC )
Laying down general hules forapplying thedifferential levy
onrawpreferential sugar
THE COUNCIL OFTHE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,
Having regard totheTreaty establishing theEuropean Economic Community ,
Having regard toCouncil Regulation (EEC)No.../ 81of 1981
onthecommon organization ofthemarket insugar (1),and inparticular
Article 37 (1)thereof ,
Having regard totheproposal 'from theCommission ,
Whereas Article 36 (1)ofRegulation (EEC)No.... /81provides that inthe
marketing years 1981 /82to1983 /84adifferential levy shall' beimposed on
rawpreferential sugar when itisput into free circulation inthe
Community ;
Whereas Article 36 (2)(b)ofthe said Regulation makes provision forthe
non-application ofthewhole ofthedifferential levy ,orpart ofthe
levy ,toany rawpreferential sugar which isimported into regions of
the Community tobedetermined and which isrefined inaunit other than
arefinery asdefined inArticle 36 (3)ofthat Regulation ;
Whereas ,having regard tothetraditional patterns ofsupplies ofthe
said sugar toIreland ,amaximum quantity of30000tonnes ofthat sugar
expressed aswhite sugar and refined inthat region inthe1980 /81marketing
year wasexempted from thedifferential levy ;whereas ,forthesame
-reasons ,that exemption should becontinued inrespect ofIreland ;
Whereas ,having regard totheLikely ,relationship between production and
consumption inItaly ,itisappropriate toprovide asimilar exemption from
thedifferential levy inrespect ofamaximum quantity of50000tonnes
expressed aswhite sugar which will berefined inItaly ;
Whereas such exemptions should apply during themarketing years 1981 /82to
1983 /84inwhich thedifferential levy applies ,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION :
(1)0JNoL

Article 1 ,
For the purpose ofapplying thedifferential levy referred to
inArticle 36(1)ofRegulation (EEC)No, theyield ofthe
rawpreferential sugar inquestion shall becalculated bydoubling
the degree ofpolarization ofthat sugar and deducting 100 therefrom .
Article 2
During the marketing years 1981/82to1983 /84thedifferential levy
referred toinArticle 1shall not apply topreferential sugar refined
t - *inIreland uptoamaximum annual quantity of30000 tonnes ofsugar-
expressed aswhite sugar orinItaly uptoamaximum annual quantity of
50000 tonnes ofsugar expressed aswhite sugar .
. ( Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on 1July 1981 .
This Regulation shall bebinding initsentirety anddirectly applicable
inall Member States . •
Done at • ,For the Council

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
Article 12ofthe new basic sugar Regulation (EEC)No.../ 81 provides
that the Council ,,acting onaproposal from the Commission ,shall adopt
general rules governing minimum stocks inthis sector and shall fix the
percentage toapply tothis stock from 1July 1981 .
The minimum stock system wasfirst established byRegulation (EEC)No1488 /76.
Following the new basic Regulation ,theattached proposal recasts Regulation
(EEC)No1488 /76while retaining most ofitsexisting provisions with the
following adaptations :
(a)the percentage for the stocks tobeheld bymanufacturers of
beet sugar may fluctuate between 8%and 5%oftheir production
within their Aquotas ;
(b)the permanent percentage applicable torefiners ofraw cane sugar
will be 5%ofthe quantity ofsugar they have refined .
The raw cane sugar produced inthe FOD will beassimilated with
preferential sugar ;
(c)for the raw sugar produced inthe FOD the minimum stock obligation
will betransferred tothe refiners ofthis sugar .
.Forthe manufacturers ofbeet sygar and for the refiners ofraw cane
sugar the percentage applicable from 1July 1981 will be8%.This
percentage has applied since August 1980 .
.This proposal has nofinancial implications .

A.Propoeal for a
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC )
laying down general rules concerning thesystem ofminimum stocks'
inthe sugar sector
THE COUNCIL OFTHE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,
Having regard totheTreaty establishing theEuropean Economic Community ,
Having regard toCouncil Regulation (EEC)No.../81of 1981 onthe
common organisation ofthemarket insugar (1),
Having regard totheproposal from theCommission , .
Whereas inview oftheaims ofthecommon agricultural policy ,inparticular the
stabilisation ofmarkets ,themaintenance ofreasonable prices ofsupplies to
consumers ,and thesafeguarding ofnormal supplies fortheentire Community and
each ofitsregions ,Article 12ofRegulation (EEC)No ,/81provides for
theestablishment ofasystem ofminimum stocks ;whereas the said Article lays
down that theminimum stock tobeheld bymanufacturers ofbeet sugar shall be'
equal toapercentage oftheir production within the limit oftheir Aquota ;
whereas asregards cane sugar thesaid article lays down that theminimum stock
shall beequal toapercentage ofthequantity ofsugar refined over afixed
period ;whereas thepercentages tobeadopted must allow theabove-mentioned
aims tobeachieved whilst taking into account theconditions under which the ^
sugar inquestion ismanufactured orrefined ; "
Whereas these stocks must beheld under certain conditions bythemanufacturers
and refiners ofthe sugar inquestion ;whereas itisnecessary toapply this
system in-such away astotake account oftheexisting structures inthe
sugar sector ;whereas thecriteria necessary fortheproper utilisation ofthe
minimum stocks should belaid down ;
Whereas Council Regulation (EEC)No1488 /76of22June 1976 laying down pro­
visions fortheintroduction ofasystem ofminimum stocks inthesugar sector(2 ),
asamended byRegulation (EEC )No2153 /80 (3),should berepealed ,- -
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION : '- ■
(1)OJNoL
(2)OJNoL167,26.6.1976 ,p.11
(3)OJNoL211,14.8.1980 ,p.1

Article 1
Without prejudice tothe other provisions ofthis Regulation and inso
far a§the products concerned are those towhich Article 8ofRegulation
(EEC )No..„/ 81applies :
(a)each manufacturer ofbeet sugar shall ,throughout each month of
the calendar year ,,hold instock aquantity ofsugar equal toa
fixed percentage ofits actual production ,within the limit of
the Aquota ofthe undertaking ,during the 12months immediately
preceding the month inquestion ,,This percentage shall be 8%from
1February ineach marketing year .For the following months itmay
bereduced with effect from the first ofamonth insofar asthe
reduction isnot such astoimpede the aims ofArticle 12of
Regulation (EEC)No..../ 81.The percentage may not bereduced
below 5%.
(b)each refiner ofraw cane sugar produced inthe French overseas
departments orof preferential sugar shall ,throughout each
month ofthe calendar year,hold instock aquantity ofsugar equal
to5%ofthe sugar inquestion refined byits undertaking during
the 12months immediately preceding the month inquestion .
Article 2
Without prejudice toArticle 3and tosuch derogations as may be
decided upon inthe detailed rules ,the minimum stock must bethe
property ofthe manufacturer orrefiner inquestion and must beun­
encumbered byany commitments which might impede the aims ofArticle 12
ofRegulation (EEC)No.../ 81.
Article 3
Raw beet sugar orsyrups produced prior tothe crystallizing stage
which are manufactured byanundertaking having an Aquota ,which
form part ofits minimum stock and which are intended for processing
into white sugar byanother undertaking :
(a)may besold tothe processor oncondition that the latter undertakes ,
with respect tothe quantity ofthe product inquestion ,tomeet
the obligations referred tounder (a)ofArticle 1and inArticle 2;

-3-
or
\
(b)atthe request ofthe manufacturer who produced them,shall not be
subject tothe obligation referred tounder (a)ofArticle 1in
return for the reimbursement bythe manufacturer ofaflat-rate
amount representing the pecuniary advantage resulting from the ,
release from the said obligation .
Artide 4
;Where the supply ofsugar tothe Community can nolonger be
ensured under normal conditions provision may bemade for the owner ,of
aminimum stock tobereleased ,inwhole orinpart,from the obligation
■*,tohold the sugar inquestion instock . .-./
Article 5
Where the market situation sorequires orwhere action torelease sugar
taken inaccordance with Article 4isineffective ,the Council ,acting
byaqualified majority onaproposal from the Commission ,shall adopt
appropriate measures toensure that the necessary quantities are taken
out ofstock tosupply the Community orone ormore Community zones
under normal conditions . '
Article 6
Where sugar from minimum stocks ismarketed under conditions other than
those provided for bythe rules ofthe system ofminimum stocks a
charge shall belevied inrespect ofthe sugar somarketed . •
%
,The amount ofthe charge shall becalculated onthe basis of:-
i(a)afixed amount representing the pecuniary advantage referred to
under (b)ofArticle 3,
.and
s *
(b)the difference between the threshold price and the intervention
price fixed for white sugar forthemarketing year inquestion
. plus afixed amount oftwo ECU per 100 kilograms .
Article 7
Asatransitional measure during the period 1July 1981 to31January 1982,
the percentage referred tounder (a)and <b)ofArticle 1shall be 8%.
This percentage may bereduced atauniform rate for the sugars referred
tointhe said Article .The percentage may not bereduced below 5%.

Article 8
1„This Regulation shall enter into force onthe day ofits publication in
the Official Journal ofthe European Communities .
Itshall apply with effect from 1July 1981 .
2=Regulation (EEC)No1488 /76ishereby repealed and the references in
Article 7thereof shall beunderstood asreferences toArticle 12 (3)
ofRegulation (EEC )No /81.
This Regulation shall bebinding initsentirety anddirectly applicable in
all Member States .
Done at For the Counci I

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.Thenewbasicsugarregulation applicable from1July1981provides that
derived (i.e.regionalised )priceswillhenceforth befixedonlyforthe
deficit zonesoftheCommunity .Thus,sincetheFrenchoverseas departments
(FOD)arenon-def1dt zones,theintervention priceforwhitesugarandthat
forrawsugarwillapplyintheFODattheex-factory stagetounpacked sugar
loadedontoameansoftransport choseqbythepurchaser .
TheCouncil hasrecognised thatinthesecircumstances thetraditional
marketing ofFODsugarintheEuropean regionsoftheCommunity couldbe
rendered impossible .Ithastherefore provided inthenewbasicregulation
(Article 9(4))thatappropriate measures mustbetakeninordertopermit
thismarketing totakeplace.
2.Duringdiscussions onthisquestion inthedifferent bodiesoftheCouncil,
theCommission indicated itsclearintention toproposetotheCouncil
measures whichwouldconsistpartlyofCommunity aidsgrantedinthecontext
oftheinvervention system(1)andpartlyofanauthorisation toFranceto
grantanational aidundercertainconditions .
.1■ . - ">
TheCommission considers thatthisapproach responds exactlytotheobligations
stemming fromsuccessive Councildeclarations onthetreatment tobe
accorded toFODsugar,inparticular theresolution adopted bytheCouncil
atitssession on29/30September 1975,paragraph 4ofwhichsays,interalia:
"Fortheperiodfrom1July1976theCouncil:
agreesthatthegeneralponditions applicable tothemarketing ofun­
refined canesugarfromtheFrenchoverseas departments mustensurethat
thissugarisactually marketed intheCommunity andcomplies withthe
principle ofCommunity preference ,withoutdiscrimination betweenthe
,■■undertakings concerned ."(DocR/3035/75).. 1
Additionally theCouncil,duringitssession on1x9December 1974tooknote ,
ofthefollowing declaration bytheCommission : ."
"Particularly asfaraspriceguarantees areconcerned ,FODproducers .
willneverreceivelessfavourable treatment thanproducers intheACP
states.TheCommission willsubmitappropriate proposals shouldthe
needarise."(DocR/3588/74).
(1)seeDoc.10.611/80AGRIORG 639,27.10.1980 ,p.7

Data covering the Last' three campaigns inthe FODshow that the
average total production was about 350 000tonnes (i.e. 100 000tonnes
intheAntilles and250000tonnes inReunion )with anaverage total
consumption oftheorder of33000tonnes .This leaves onaverage a
disposable surplus ofaround 317 000tonnes .
Now asignificant part ofthesugar refined inthepure refineries in
metropolitan France consists ofrawpreferential sugar .This means
that about 200000tonnes ofraw F0Dsugar canbedisposed ofthrough
these refineries ,with thebalance ofthe F0Dsurplus beings exported
tel quel .
Theproposed Community aidwould comprise :
(a)aflat-rate amount of12.62 ECUpertonne ofsugar ,expressed as
white sugar ,forthe 1981 /82marketing year .This amount isintended
torepresent inthat year thetransport costs between theex-factory
stage andthe FOBandstowed stage .Itisbased ontheactual costs
in1980 /81forthethree F0D (Reunion ,Guadeloupe andMartinique ),
expressed inwhite value andadjusted totake account ofthe increases
inprices forthe 1981 /82marketing year .
This flat-rate amount would beadjusted ineach subsequent marketing
year bythe increase intheintervention price for white sugar .
(b)asingle flat-rate amount equal to0.8 %oftheintervention price
forwhite sugar which isintended torepresent themaritime transport
insurance costs forthe sugar inquestion .Forthe 1981 /82marketing
year this flat-rate amount would be4.04 ECUpertonne ofsugar
expressed aswhite sugar ; ,
(c)asingle flat-rate amount representing thetransport costs from the
FOBstage tothe CIFfree out stage ,European ports oftheCommunity .
This amount would beequal tothe Caribbean -UKfreight element as
established bythe Freight Committee ofthe United Terminal Sugar'
Market Association ofLondon and incorporated intheLondon Daily
Price for rawsugar .This element would bethat valid ontheday on
which thebill ofLading wascompleted forthe sugar cargo inquestion
/
,0nthis basis the flat-rate amount would becurrently equivalent to
31.90 ECUpertonne ofsugar expressed aswhite sugar .

-3-
Thus,takingintoaccountcurrentdata,theunitary amountofthis
Community aidforthe1981/82marketing yearwouldbe48.56ECUpertonne
ofsugarexpressed aswhitesugar.
5.Theauthorisation ofaFrenchnational aidisintended abovealltoallow
equality oftreatment attherefining stagebetween rawsugarandraw
preferential sugar,andthisaidelementshouldtherefore represent the
difference betweenthestorageleviesapplicable tothesetwosugars.
Forthe1981/82marketing yearthisdifference willbe24.40ECUpertonne
ofsugarexpressed aswhitesugar.Itgoeswithoutsayingthatwheresuch
aidisgranteditmustbeappliedwithoutdistinction astotheCommunity
zoneinwhichtherefining takesplaceandtothesugarwhichhasbene-
fittedfromtheCommunity aidreferred toinpoint4andwhichwillbe
refinedinarefinery (asdefinedinthe'basicsugarregulation
(Article 36(3))situated intheCommunity .
f

Proposal for a ■
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC )
Laying down measures for themarketing ofsugar produced in
the French overseas departments
THE COUNCIL OFTHE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,
Having regard totheTreaty establishing theEuropean Economic Community ,
Having regard toCouncil Regulation (EEC )No /81of 1931 onthe
common organisation ofthemarket insugar (1),and inparticular
Articles 9(5)and 39thereof ,
Having regard totheproposal from theCommission ,
Whereas since the system ofprices applicable trom 1July 1981 provides for
thefixing ofregionalized derived prices only forthedeficit zones ,themarket ingin
theEuropean regions oftheCommunity ofsugar 'sproduced inthe French over­
seas departments ,which arenon-deficit zones ,cannot beaccomplished
without theadoption ofappropriate measures .
Whereas tothis endArticle 9(4)ofRegulation (EEC )No /81lays down
that appropriate measures shall betaken inorder topermit the sugars pro­
duced inthe French overseas departments tobemarketed in .the European
regions ofthe Community ;
Whereas the most appropriate measure consists inthegranting ofaflat-rate
Community aid within the framework ofthe intervention system ,which would
permit themarketing ofthe sugars inquestion inthe European regions of
the Community ,that isatthe CIFship 'shold stage ,European port ;whereas ,more­
.over ,this first measure should be "supplemented byauthorizing theFrench
Republic togrant anational aidtothese sugars w'nen they arerefined ina
refinery asdefined inArticle 36 (3)ofRegulation (EEC )No /81,
irrespective ofits location inthe Community ,inorder totake account
for thepurpose ofsecuring equality oftreatment ofthedifferences bet­
ween the storage levies onthe sugars produced inthe French overseas
departments and those onthepreferential sugars imported for thepurpose
ofrefining ,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION :
(1)OJNo L
%

-2-
Article 1
1.During the marketing years 1981 /82to1985 /86there shall begranted
asanintervention measure aflat-rate Community aid forthe marketing
inthe European regions ofthe Community ofsugars produced inthe
French overseas departments .
This aid shall beadministered bythe French Republic .
2.The aid referred toinparagraph 1per tonne ofsugar expressed as
white sugar shall consist of:
(a)aflat-rate amount of12.62 ECU for the 1981 /82marketing year ;
for each ofthe following marketing years this amount shall be
adjusted byacoefficient representing the percentage increase
inthe intervention price for white sugar byreference tothat in
force during the immediately preceding marketing year ;
, <b>asingle flat-rate amount equal to0.8 %ofthe intervention price
! for white sugar tocover the costs ofinsurance forthe sea -
j transport ofthe sugar inquestion ;
Ν
(c)asingle flat-rate amount tocover the sea transport costs from
the FOBstage inthe French overseas departments tothe CIFship's
hold stage ,European ports ofthe Community ;this amount shall be
equal tothe Caribbean-United Kingdom freight element asestablished
bythe Freight Committee ofthe United Terminal Sugar Market Asso­
ciation ofLondon and incorporated inthe London Daily .Price for
raw sugar , valid onthe day onwhich thebill oflading is
completed for the sugar inquestion .
3.Thetotal amount ofaid calculated inaccordance with paragraph 2shall ,
onrequest "submitted tothe competent authorities ofthe French Republic ,
;begranted totheproducer ofthesugars referred toinparagraph 1.
0 ■'

Article 2
4*
1.For the marketing years 1981 /82to1985 /86,and inrespect of
the sugars referred toinArticle 1which have benefited from the aid
referred tointhat Article and which ha^e been refined inarefinery
asdefined iaArticle 36 (3)ofRegulation (EEC )No /81and situated
inthe Communi ty,the French Republic shall beauthorised togrant a
national aid .The amount ofthis aid shall beequal tothe difference
between the levy referred tounder (a)ofthe third subparagraph of
Article 8(2)ofthe said Regulation and those referred tounder (b)
and (c)ofthe third subparagraph ofthe said Article which are appli­
cable atthe end ofthe month during which the sugar inquestion was
refined .
2.When the French Republic utilises the authorisation referred toin
paragraph 1the aid shall not beconditional onthe Community zone in
which the sugar inquestion isrefined .
Article 3
The French Republic shall inform the Commission each month ,within the
two months following the month inquestion ,ofthe amounts ofthe aid
referred toinArticle 1which have been granted and ofthe corresponding
quantities ofsugar concerned .
Article 4
This Regulation shall enter into force onthe third day following its
publication inthe Official Journal ofthe European Communities .
Itshall apply from 1July 1981 .
This Regulation shall bebinding initsentirety anddirectly applicable
inall Member States .
Done at For the Counci I

\^ - ·. ·
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
|0ate:;22.5.1981
1.BU0GETHEADING Ï6.4.14APPROPRIATIONS :10>78MECMI
2.TITLE:Proposed CouncilRegulation (EEC)No.layingdownmeasures forthe
marketing ofsugarsproduced intheFrenchoverseas departments (FOD)
3.LEGALBASIS:Article 9(4)and(5)ofthenewbasicsugarregulation applicable
from1July1981
4.AIMSofPROJECT:Measures aimedatensuring themarketing ofFODsugarintheEuro­
peanregionsoftheCommunity andtheequality oftreatment asbetween Community
.refineries whichrefine .FODsugarandimportedpreferential sugar
5.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
5.0EXPENDITURE
-CHARGED TOTHEECBUDGET
.((©(iMCXXINTERVENTIONS )
-NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION
-OTHER
5.1RECEIPTS
-OWNRESOURCES OFTHEEC
(LEVIES/CUSTOMS DUTIES)
-NATIONAL .VPERIOD OF12MONTHS
9.7MECU
4.8MECU'CURRENT FINANCIAL YEAR
£ai_j
3.2MECUFOLLOWING FINANCIAL YEAR
(82-2
6.5MECU
5.0.1ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE
5.1.1ESTIMATED RECEIPTS
5.2METHOD OFCALCULATION . ,.'
(a)Community aid;12.62ECU+4.04+31.90=48.56ECU/t
48.56χ200000=9.712ΜΕΰυ
Cb)National aid:Thisaidcoversthedifference betweentheCommurfity storage
levy(35.5ECU/t)andthatonpreferential sugar<11.1ECU/t)
6.0CANTHEPROJECT BEFINANCEQ FROMAPPROPRIATIONSENTERED INTHERELEVANT CHAPTER OFTHECURRENT BUDGET ?
~ YES/tML-
s. LCVT9U *.
6.3WILLFUTURE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BENECESSARY ?
YES/f*
OBSERVATIONj,:jf,eSyStemofCommunity aidsapplicable uptonowtothemarketing of
FODsugariscoveredintheCommunity budgetforaglobalamountof10.78MECU
(differential amount22.50ECU/TplussubsidyunderArticle 9ofthebasicregu­
lationof15ECU/Tforatotalquantity of300000tonnes).Thenewsystemwill >
opplyonlyto200000tofsugarbecause <©fchangesinCommunity refining capacity .
Thebalanceof100000tisthusdestined tobeexported .Thefinancial implication
of,theseexportsareneutralsincetheCommunity 'ssugarbalanceremainsunchanged .