COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 
COM(93) 521 final 
Brussels, 28 October 1993 
PRIORITY ACTIONS IN THE YOUTH FIELD 
ACTIVITY REPORT 1992 
(presented by the Commission) 
Contents 
Page 
I. Introduction 1 O-
II. General objectives of the Resolution 
III. Operational infrastructure 
IV. Progress and results of activities supported by the Commission in 1992 2 
V. Future perspectives 10 
10L 
Priority Actions in the Youth Field 
Activity Report 1992 
I. Introduction 
1. Ministers responsible for youth matters in the Member States of the European Community 
meeting in Luxembourg on 26 June 1991, recognising a need for further cooperation between 
Member States in the field of youth, adopted a Resolution on Priority Actions in the Youth 
Fielda), largely based on the Memorandum "Young People in the European CommunitynÇZ) 
presented by the Commission in 1990. 
2. The Resolution was designed to provide new scope for Community action in the youth sector, 
and to this effect, the Ministers defined the following areas of priority action : 
Action I: Intensification of cooperation between structures responsible for Youth Work in the 
Member States; 
Action II: Information for Young People; 
Action III: Youth Pilot Projects - Stimulating the Initiative and the Creativity of Young 
People; 
Action IV: Cooperation in the Training of Youth Workers, particularly with regard to the 
European Dimension; 
3. For 1992, the European Parliament created a specific budget line (B3-1012) for the Priority 
Actions in the Youth Field, amounting to 5 MECU, which enabled the Community to accord 
financial support to activities within the framework of the Resolution. In its comments to the 
budget, the European Parliament further extended the scope of the Resolution, by adding that 
the sum available should also serve to support : 
Exchanges of Young People for Cultural Purposes in the European Community; 
Support for Initiatives of Community Interest developed by Youth Organizations; 
Exchanges with Central and Eastern European Countries; 
Exchanges with Latin American Countries; 
Exchanges with Mediterranean Countries. 
This report reflects the most significant results of the first year of operation of the Resolution 
on Priority Actions in the Youth Field, which concerned activities taking place between the 
early summer 1992 and March 1993. Tables 1-4 (in annex) provide an indication of the 
number of projects received and accepted by Action and by Member State, the grants allocated 
by Action and by Member State, the percentage breakdown by Member State of the total grant 
allocation for each Action, and the number of participants by Action and by country. 
W Official Journal n° C 208/91 
<*> Doc. COM(90) 469 final 
II. General objectives of the Resolution 
Activities supported by the Commission within the framework of the Resolution on Priority 
Actions in the Youth Field aim to intensify cooperation between Member States in the field 
of youth, outside formal education and training, taking into account the respective structures 
in the youth sector across the Community and reflecting the diversity of traditions and 
experience in this field. 
6. Activities supported within the framework of the Resolution on Priority Actions in the Youth 
Field provide a range of measures which ensure complementarity and coherence with other 
existing Community programmes and measures, ie. the Youth for Europe Programme, the 
TEMPUS Scheme and the Youth Initiative Projects within the PETRA Programme. 
Activities are designed, in the medium- and long-term, to give rise to the development of a 
European dimension in youth work across the Community. In this context, activities not only 
involve young people, but also multipliers in the Member States who are either persons 
responsible for youth at local and regional level, or who work directly with young people, at 
local, regional and national level, outside the context of school or vocational training. 
III. Operational infrastructure 
8. In accordance with the Council Resolution, activities are implemented by the Commission of 
the European Communities. The Ad-hoc Working Group on Youth meeting within the Council 
follows developments regarding the implementation of the Resolution. 
The Commission is assisted in the implementation of the Resolution on Priority Actions in the 
Youth Field, by an external technical assistance unit, the Petra Youth Bureau. 
IV. Progress and results of activities supported by the Commission in 1992 
Action I : Intensification of cooperation between structures responsible for Youth Work 
In the Member States 
1.0. Action I aims to enable those working in the youth sector in the Member States to identify 
partners, to share their experiences, to become more familiar with the work situation and 
structures in other Member States, to explore possibilities of cooperation in their particular 
areas of work and to better understand the framework provided by the Community in the field 
of youth. To this end, funding is available to support study-experiences, seminars and 
workshops. 
11. Through Action I, the Commission has sought to involve multipliers working in as many 
diverse contexts as possible in the Member States. Action I concerns : officials working in the 
youth sector at national, regional or local level, ie. civil servants working in the youth 
departments of national, regional or local authorities, councillors for youth matters at local and 
regional level; youth association officers and youth workers working in a full-time, part-time 
or voluntary basis, at European, national, regional or local level, who are able to demonstrate 
a certain practical experience in youth work. 
12. In 1992, the majority of projects submitted were from applicants in the three Member States 
with the longest-standing traditions in youth cooperation, France, Germany and the United 
Kingdom. Beneficiaries were varied, representing youth services of local and regional 
authorities, bodies responsible for youth work at regional and national level and affiliated to 
ministries, and voluntary youth organizations working in the social, cultural and, in particular, 
environmental sectors. Participants in Action I activities reflected the vast range of profiles 
existing in youth work structures across the Community : multipliers working in traditional 
youth work settings, such as youth organizations, community centres, youth clubs, youth 
information centres, drop-in centres, and multipliers involved in predominantly detached youth 
work or out-reach work. 
13. The study-experiences supported under Action I in 1992 served primarily to give youth 
workers and other multipliers the opportunity to familiarise themselves with regional and local 
youth work policy in another Member State, to examine youth work practices and prepare 
concrete future cooperation projects. The themes of these study-experiences varied to include 
local youth information and guidance, environmental youth work, artistic expression, gender 
specific youth work, youth work with disadvantaged young people, and issues relating to 
youth mobility. 
14. The seminars and workshops supported under Action I were considered to constitute important 
multilateral platforms providing an opportunity for participants to share youth work methods 
used in working with specific target groups ie. urban youth, young immigrants, the homeless, 
young unemployed; or in dealing with specific themes in youth work ie. European integration, 
cooperation with peripheral countries of the Community, active European citizenship, migrant 
rights, and racism and xenophobic behaviour among young people. 
15. It should be noted that, for most participants in Action I activities, this was their first 
opportunity to compare their youth work reality with that of other Member States and to put 
their experience gained at local, regional or national level into a European perspective. This 
is true as concerns both multipliers working in structures providing full-time youth work 
provision and youth workers working on a voluntary basis. Although themes chosen and 
participant profiles varied greatly, it is to be noted that, for the most part, structures 
responsible for youth work in the Member States tended not to use the opportunities offered 
within the framework of Action I to their best advantage in intensifying cooperation in the 
youth field. Furthermore, few activities concentrated on specific youth work phenomena or 
models particular to, or dominating in, the different Member States, or on the applicability of 
such models to youth work in other Member States. 
Action II : Information for Young People 
16. Given that a decision regarding the implementation of the Commission's Youth Information 
Action Plan had not been taken in 1992, activities relating to the provision of information to 
young people were effectively on hold for this period. Funding was made available, under 
Action II, for the publication and dissemination of the EC Youth Forum's Youth Rights 
Charter in the nine Community languages. 
Action III : Youth Pilot Projects - Stimulating the Initiative and the Creativity of Young 
People 
17. Action III aims to stimulate the initiative and creativity of young people in the European 
Community by providing funding for Youth Pilot Projects set up by young people for young 
people, outside formal education and training, which reflect the social, cultural or economic 
situation of their local community. Youth Pilot Projects are aimed at all young people without 
exception and priority is accorded to projects which mirror the cultural/religious/linguistic 
diversity of the given local community. 
18. Action III addresses young people aged between 15 and 25 years in their immediate local 
environment In line with the Youth for Europe Programme, Action III aims to encourage the 
participation of disadvantaged young people (whether their disadvantage be for socio­
economic, regional or personal reasons) by providing up to 75% funding for projects involving 
this target group. 
19. In 1992, Action III drew an overwhelming response from groups of young people in their 
local communities across the European Community. The largest number of project applications 
submitted came from the United Kingdom, followed by Spain and Denmark. This would tend 
to indicate that information has been more successfully disseminated in these countries than 
in others. Another factor to be taken into consideration is that national funding for this type 
of initiative already exists in some Member States, whereas in others there have been cutbacks 
at national and regional level for young people's projects and activities. Applications were 
mainly submitted by local youth groups, social and cultural associations, local and regional 
youth services, and local and regional branches of national and international associations. It 
was often the case that non-organised young people, rather than existing groups, came together 
to set up Youth Pilot Projects. 
20. Activities supported under Action III in 1992, provide a clear indication of young people's 
different needs, interests and concerns in their local communities, across the European 
Community. Project themes fell, for the most part, into one of the following categories : 
integration of disadvantaged young people (young people from different cultural backgrounds, 
marginalised youth, disabled young people); peer education (drug/alcohol abuse, delinquency, 
health issues); youth information (youth rights, accommodation, employment); general 
activities in the youth field (creation of youth centres/'clubsj'associations); local heritage 
(renovation, traditional handicrafts); media (radio, newspaper, video); cultural activities (art, 
theatre, dance, music); environment. In spite of this diversity in project themes, projects 
dealing with the issue of 'integration' dominated, reflecting the level of concern among young 
Europeans with regard to the increased social and economic exclusion of certain groups. 
Young people living in a multicultural urban setting were particularly concerned with 
examining not only the question of integrating marginalised groups, but also their own 
reactions, as active members of their communities, towards these groups. 
21. Contrary to Community programmes which seek to promote youth mobility, Action III 
addresses young people in their local communities and provides an indication of their local 
concerns. However, a number of Youth Pilot Projects supported in 1992 chose Europe as a 
central theme. Young people involved in these projects considered the place of their local 
community in the wider European Community and concentrated in particular on developing 
projects likely to have a meaningful outcome for young people in other Member States also. 
22. For the first time, Action III provided young people with the opportunity to obtain direct 
funding from the Community, for activities conceived and managed by themselves, thus 
creating a new and tangible link between these young people and the Community. 
Action IV : Cooperation in the Training of Youth Workers, particularly with regard to 
the European Dimension 
23. Under Action IV, support is provided for initiatives which permit an exchange of experience 
and information between those responsible for training youth workers in different Member 
States; and/or which make it easier for youth workers to use their qualifications in other 
Member States; or which lead to the setting-up and development of transnational and European 
links between institutions and organizations involved in the initial or further training of youth 
workers. 
24. Action IV is aimed at authorities of a Member State, organizations/bodies active in the field 
of initial and/or further training for youth workers at local, regional national and European 
levels and youth organizations with experience in youth worker training at European level. It 
should be emphasized that the activities supported under Action IV are not aimed at the 
general public, but rather at bodies with experience in the field of youth worker training, 
suitably qualified to develop innovative transnational activities in this sector. Activities 
foreseen under Action IV offer broader possibilities within the framework of the professional 
development of youth workers and youth worker trainers, than current existing measures. Such 
activities should not be confused with other types of youth worker training activities, as 
foreseen in the context of the Youth for Europe Programme, for example, the latter being 
linked to the preparation, implementation and evaluation of youth exchanges. 
25. Activities supported under Action IV include : study visits for youth worker trainers, designed 
to enable participants to discover, "on the spot", in other Member States, the typical activities 
involved in training youth workers and to launch concrete cooperation measures; study visits 
for youth workers, which aim to provide youth workers with an opportunity to make contacts 
for their professional development; seminars and studies to collect further information on the 
status of youth workers and their training in other Member States; the development and 
implementation of training modules for youth workers, the specific content of which should 
serve to illustrate the "European dimension" and to incorporate it as "added value" into the 
initial or further training programmes for youth workers at national level. 
26. In 1992, beneficiaries were mainly public and semipublic bodies, with experience in European 
level cooperation in the field of youth worker training. The study visits for youth workers and 
youth worker trainers were perceived to be an important measure for strengthening cooperation 
between structures and organizations undertaking youth worker training, and were seen as a 
first step in, for example, the setting up of a network of detached youth workers and trainers. 
27. The seminars and studies provided participants with an opportunity to examine the status and 
profile of youth workers in the Member States, and their position with regard to the labour 
market in general. Seminars and studies also provided a framework within which to explore 
the social and cultural context of youth work, and to determine the extent to which further 
training activities existing at national level in the Member States can incorporate the European 
dimension. 
28. Activities supported in 1992, involving the development and implementation of training 
modules, concentrated on intercultural learning. The resulting modules will serve to introduce 
a real European dimension into youth worker training undertaken by training institutions at 
regional and at national level. 
29. Action IV activities reflected a need and growing interest regarding the development of 
cooperation networks between training bodies in the different Member States to establish 
working conditions suitable for the introduction of training elements fostering the mobility of 
youth workers. Although such cooperation should involve all Member States, the degree of 
active cooperation varied in 1992, given that the status and training of youth workers and 
youth worker trainers differs considerably from one Member State to another. 
Exchanges of Young People for Cultural Purposes 
30. Under this action, support is available for tri- or multilateral exchange projects, with a duration 
of between three days and four weeks, involving young people aged 15 to 25 years, which are 
organised at the initiative of the participants themselves. Such projects are required to have 
a coherent educational structure and, through the means of artistic expression, to provide those 
involved with a culturally enriching European experience. 
31. In 1992, applications were submitted mainly by organizations operating at local and regional 
level, and covered a wide range of cultural activities : theatre, dance, music, plastic arts, video, 
photography, sculpture, debates on European culture and the organization and production of 
shows. 
32. The broad range of cultural exchange projects supported in 1992 is an indication that, not only 
is artistic expression a popular method in youth work practice across the Community, but that 
it is also an important instrument for work with young people in a mobility context, and in 
particular concerning activities with disadvantaged youth. Artistic expression has been proven 
to be a suitable and innovative method for use in both preparation activities prior to the project 
and in facilitating the implementation of the project itself. 
Support for Initiatives of Community Interest developed by Youth Organizations 
33. This action is designed to provide youth organizations with the possibility of intensifying 
cooperation at European level and to maintain appropriate contacts through the creation of 
infrastructures. Financial support is thus available for : cooperation between organizations at 
local, regional or national level, to develop a specific project of Community interest; and the 
creation of an infrastructure, involving organizations in at least four Member States, for the 
development of initiatives by those organizations and extension of the infrastructure to new 
partners. 
34. Most of the applications in 1992 were submitted by organizations working at national or 
European level and concerned the development of their infrastructure in relation to the youth 
work already being carried out and the identification and development of networks with new 
partners. Applicants were mainly European non-governmental organizations (working in the 
environmental, disability and voluntary sectors) and Spanish organizations. Activities supported 
were, for a large part, infrastructure projects, concentrating on improving information 
provisions to the various parties involved. 
35. The considerable demand for funding under this action in 1992 can be partly explained by the 
fact that very few "institutional" grants are available, either at national or at Community level, 
for infrastructure and aid for the setting up of cooperation projects. This prevents new 
organizations, or groups of organizations, from meeting the increasing demand for the setting-
up of convenient infrastructures to deal with new partners and for the setting-up of new types 
of actions to be created in a larger context than the Community. 
Exchanges with Central and Eastern European Countries 
36. With a view to intensifying cooperation with Central and Eastern Europe in the field of youth 
exchange and mobility, funding was made available for activities with those Central and 
Eastern European countries not covered by the TEMPUS Scheme. In 1992, these were 
Armenia, Belorussia, Georgia, Russia and the Ukraine. Financial support was accorded to three 
types of activities : youth exchange projects for groups of young people, preparatory study 
visits and training courses for youth workers. The main objective was to prepare the ground 
for future forms of cooperation, and in this context, priority was given to preparatory study 
visits and training courses involving multipliers from the European Community and the 
eligible countries. 
37. The majority of project applications submitted in 1992 were from national and European non­
governmental organizations with experience in European-level youth exchanges and with well-
established links with the eligible countries. European non-governmental organizations and 
German organizations led in the number of applications submitted and projects supported. 
With regard to the eligible countries, the partners in Russia were in the majority, followed by 
Belorussia, the Ukraine and Armenia. 
38. Support was accorded to bi-, tri- and multilateral youth exchange activities, involving young 
people aged between 15 and 25 years residing in one or more Member States of the European 
Community or in the eligible countries. In 1992, most of these exchanges took place in a 
Member State of the Community. Project themes varied covering economic, social and 
environmental issues, though all were relevant both in a cross-frontier European context and 
with regard to young people's needs, interests and everyday realities. Projects provided the 
young people taking part with the opportunity to gain maximum understanding of their 
countries' social, political and cultural situation and the degree to which this is affecting their 
life and their future, in the East-West framework. 
39. Preparatory study visits supported in 1992 were aimed at youth workers working directly with 
young people, either on a full-time, part-time or voluntary basis, and other multipliers working 
in the youth field. There was an equal number of study visits held in the Community and in 
the eligible countries. Study visits were regarded by all organisers as a complementary activity 
to develop medium-term cooperation with the eligible countries. Areas for cooperation were 
linked to the situation of young people and to youth structures in the respective countries, with 
youth exchanges being one aspect of this cooperation. 
40. Training courses supported in 1992 all involved multipliers with previous experience of youth 
exchange or would-be facilitators of East-West exchanges, and were seen to be essential in 
ensuring the quality of future youth exchange activities with the eligible countries. Some 
training courses were of a general nature, providing assistance for partners from eligible 
countries in the work they wished to conduct in the field of youth exchange and/or in the field 
of youth work with young people at local, regional or national level. Others were more 
specifically centred on the organization of the exchanges themselves : introduction to 
leadership techniques, comparison of experiences with regard to exchange activities, new 
contacts for future cooperation, assessment of current deficits and problems, motivation and 
methods of work and expectations of those involved. 
41. Most activities implemented in 1992, be it youth exchanges, preparatory study visits or 
training courses, reflected excitement and optimism about the potential for new forms of 
cooperatioQ in the youth field. Despite the administrative and financial obstacles encountered 
by the organisers (reliability of partners, difficulties in the issuing of visas in particular for 
participants from the eligible countries, difficulties in obtaining sufficient grants from public 
sources both in the eligible countries and the Member Slates, fluctuation in prices and 
currencies in the eligible countries) and the obvious communication problems (of a technical 
and semantic nature), there was certainly no lack of motivation and determination on behalf 
of the organisers or the participants. 
Exchanges with Latin American Countries 
42. With a view to intensifying cooperation in the field of exchanges and the mobility of young 
people, between the European Community and the eligible countries of Latin America (namely 
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, 
Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela), financial 
support was made available for the following types of activities : conferences/seminars, 
preparatory study visits, training courses and pilot youth exchanges. 
43. The largest number of project applications submitted in 1992 were from Spanish and European 
non-governmental youth organizations, most having experience and a tradition of cooperation 
in the youth field with Latin American countries. Of those activities supported, the majority 
were held in the eligible countries, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay and Mexico being the most frequent 
hosting countries. Most of the projects held in the Member States were in Spain, followed by 
France and Portugal. 
44. The conferences/seminars often dealt with the North-South issue and how to reduce 
discrepancies. In this context, the anniversary of 500 years of the discovery of America was 
debated in relation to the current situation regarding education, culture, youth unemployment, 
immigration, development of youth activities, etc.. Activities concentrated for the most part 
on making contacts with, and contributing to the development of, the youth structures in Latin 
America. 
45. Preparatory study visits constituted one third of all activities supported under this action, and 
were mainly hosted in Latin American Countries. The purpose of the study visits was to 
provide those taking part with an opportunity to become acquainted with the situation of 
young people in Latin America, to make contact with structures responsible for youth work 
there and to look at the potential for developing Euro-Latin American youth exchanges, 
determining how best permanent links could be established between European and Latin 
American youth structures. 
46. For the most part, training courses supported in 1992 were designed to enable youth workers 
from Latin American countries to acquire sufficient expertise in leadership training for general 
youth work, to in turn train counterparts in their respective countries; or to acquire the skills 
needed for the organization and implementation of youth exchange projects. 
47. Pilot youth exchanges all resulted from contacts and cooperation established over a period of 
several years between European and Latin American structures. The main issues dealt with 
through these activities were environmental problems, social injustice, poverty, the situation 
of disabled youth, international solidarity and cooperation and cultural topics. Some youth 
exchanges involved the participants in activities concentrating on the need to improve the 
living conditions, both in rural and urban areas, giving participants a unique insight into the 
situation of the local hosting community. 
48. In identifying potential Latin American partners and determining forms of cooperation, it 
became clear to European partners that, to some youth organizations, the concept of youth 
exchange was a totally new and unfamiliar one. For some organizations, becoming involved 
in Euro-Latin American exchanges in the immediate future would not pose any serious 
problems, whereas for others, it was impossible to envisage such forms of cooperation at 
present, for practical, social and other reasons. Activities were regarded, by both organisers 
and participants, to be a very positive experience, both in professional and personal terms. 
European participants discovered that not only did they have a lot to share, but also to learn 
from their Latin American counterparts. Many found that they were forced to modify their 
preconceptions regarding Latin American countries during the activities, as they realised that, 
in terms of youth participation, the genuine concern for international cooperation, the level of 
creativity and the firm belief that the young people would benefit tremendously from Euro-
Latin American exchanges, the Latin American partner organizations were very different to 
what had originally been expected. 
10 
Exchanges with Mediterranean Countries 
49. In view of the experimental nature of activities with Mediterranean countries and the limited 
funds available, financial support was granted for conferences/seminars and preparatory study 
visits aimed at exploring the possibilities of cooperation with regard to exchanges and mobility 
between the European Community and Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia. Most beneficiaries had 
considerable experience and a tradition of cooperation in the youth field, to varying degrees 
with the Mediterranean countries concerned. With regard to the eligible Mediterranean 
countries, partnerships with Tunisia were dominant, followed by Morocco and Algeria. 
50. Of the seminars supported in 1992, most aimed to consolidate links and experience already 
existing with the Mediterranean countries with a view to developing future, more systematic 
and more permanent action programmes with young people and youth workers. Some seminars 
provided a general platform for the identification of different aspects of the youth situation in 
the participating countries, whereas others focused on very specific themes, such as 
environmental protection, working with young disabled people, social and local development, 
and youth worker training in the European Community and in Mediterranean countries. 
51. Study visits aimed either to strengthen existing contacts or to establish new ones. Such 
activities provided youth workers with an ideal opportunity to witness the practical 
commitment of, and project work carried out by, structures in the Maghreb. Study visits also 
illustrated the motivation, possibilities and priorities driving those working at all levels in the 
youth field, the obstacles which they face, and their diverse needs and wishes in relation to 
cooperation with European Community countries. 
52. Among the exchange activities with third countries, the exchanges with the Mediterranean 
countries were those with the lowest rates not only of grant applications, but also of requests 
for information and advice for future projects. It is too early to draw conclusions as to the 
reason for this lack of response. Among the factors to be taken into consideration are a 
relatively weak exchange and mobility tradition in the youth sector between the European 
Community and the Mediterranean countries and an unclear and little known situation with 
regard to youth work in the countries concerned. There is an evident need for more 
opportunities to be created for activities with the Maghreb and multilateral seminars and study 
visits are important in this respect, in that they provide an ideal partner-finding context for 
multipliers working in the youth sector. 
V. Future perspectives 
53. In 1992, some 350 activities were supported within the framework of the Priority Actions in 
the Youth Field, with approximately 7,800 young people and youth workers benefitting 
directly, providing a solid foundation for the further intensification of cooperation between 
youth work structures in the Member States and future forms of cooperation with eligible third 
countries. 
11 
54. By the end of 1992, there was a growing awareness of the existence of the Priority Actions 
in the Youth Field and of the complementarity and coherence that they provide in relation to 
other Community programmes and measures. The Priority Actions in the Youth Field are seen 
to have combined to lend a new impetus to transnational cooperation in the youth sector across 
the European Community. Of particular interest was the overwhelming response shown by 
young people to the opportunity for direct partnership with the Community, through activities 
at local level, which reflect their active and full participation as community and Community 
citizens. 
55. The framework provided by the European Community for activities under the Resolution on 
Priority Actions in the Youth Field has been maintained in 1993, the European Parliament 
having renewed the budget line for 1993 with an endowment of 5,5 MECU. Furthermore, the 
Parliament has decided that, henceforth, the budget lines for the Youth for Europe Programme 
and for the Priority Actions in the Youth Field be featured in the budget listing under one 
heading B 3-101 : Youth Policy. 
PRIORITY ACTIONS IN THE YOUTH FIELD/ 
ACTIONS PRIORITAIRES DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA JEUNESSE Annex/Annexe 1 
PROJECTS RECEIVED/ACCEPTED BY ACTION AND BY MEMBER STATE IN 1992 
PROJETS RECUS/ACCEPTES PAR ACTION ET PAR ETAT MEMBRE EN 1992 
COUNTRY/ 
PAYS 
B 
DK 
D 
GR 
E 
F 
IRL 
I 
L 
NL 
P 
UK 
NGO's 
TOTAL ACTION 1 
Rec Ace 
4 
2 
14 
1 
4 
27 
3 
1 
1 
10 
15 
7 1 
2 
8 
1 
3 
16 
2 
1 
10 
7 
59 ACTION 2 
Rec Ace ACTION 3 
Rec | Ace 
48 
77 
53 
12 
83 
42 
36 
18 
1 
14 
48 
117 
1 19 
14 
19 
6 
16 
10 
16 
3 
1 
13 
38 
550| 155 ACTION 4 
Rec Ace 
181 15 ICI 
Rec | Ace 
1 
3 
3 
14 
36 1 
11 
16 CULT. EX. 
Rec Ace 
1 
2 
2 
3 
5 
2 
1 
2 
3 
4 
28 14 CEC 
Rec Ace 
6 
2 
14 
1 
3 
2 
6 
7 
15 
61 5 
12 
40 LAT 
Rec Ace 
1 
1 
18 
5 
2 
3 
1 
3 
15 MED 
Rec Ace 
1 
12 
4 
1 
2 
1 
2 
11 
52l 37 22 TOTAL 
Rec Ace 
13 70 
83 
86 
16 
118 
95 
47 
32 
4 
33 
53 
152 
68 
857 27 
19 
40 
10 
36 
38 
25 
12 
2 
13 
14 
60 
54 
350 
^ 
r* 
PRIORITY ACTIONS IN THE YOUTH FIELD/ 
ACTIONS PRIORITAIRES DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA JEUNESSE 
GRANTS ALLOCATED BY ACTION AND BY MEMBER STATE IN 1992 (In ECU) 
SUBVENTIONS ATTRIBUEES PAR ACTION ET PAR ETAT MEMBRE EN 1992 (en ECU) Annex/Annexe 2 
COUNTRY/ 
PAYS 
B 
DK 
D 
GR 
E 
F 
IRL 
I 
L 
NL 
P 
UK 
NGO's 
TOTAL ACTION 1 
20,000 
19,200 
59,164 
12,000 
5,624 
92,124 
29,170 
14,400 
53,474 
115,910 
41,011 ACTION 2 ACTION 3 
60,000 163,686 
181,719 
91,270 
105,794 
149,265 
97,348 
116,113 
29,959 
10,000 
111,353 
261,901 ACTION 4 
13,172 
13,540 
53,131 
41,000 
70,457 
97,909 ICI 
462,077|[ 60,000|| 1,318,40811 289,209|| 282,55511 213,730 25,000 
15,446 
17,077 
19,348 
6,165 
199,519 CULT. EX. CEC LAT 
Meetings of experts, conferences, information and publications/ 
Reunions d'experts, conférences, information et publications 
Technical Assistance/Assistance Technique 40,656 
28,930 
10,000 
44,548 
29,434 
7,162 
53,000 
545,948 31,098 
22,573 
84,488 
3,968 
34,499 
35,247 
51,335 
40,212 
88,417 
154,111 27,145 
35,000 
25,000 
365,392 
90,000 
34,269 
53,317 
20,342 
33,735 
279,904 MED 
964,104 2,850 
4,000 
29,736 
29,235 
16,000 
20,000 
15,000 
49,148 TOTAL 
165,969 257,951 
258,492 
304,578 
171,724 
579,431 
418,371 
283,930 
217,793 
51,000 
115,848 
131,695 
576,585 
934,602 
4,302,000 
198,000 
500,000 
TOTAL 5,000,000! 
X 
^ 
PRIORITY ACTIONS IN THE YOUTH FIELD/ 
ACTIONS PRIORITAIRES DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA JEUNESSE Annex/Annexe 3 
PERCENTAGE RECEIVED PER MEMBER STATE OF THE TOTAL GRANT ALLOCATION 
FOR EACH ACTION IN 1992 
REPARTITION (en %) ENTRE LES ETATS MEMBRES DE LA SUBVENTIONS TOTALE ATTRIBUEE 
A CHAQUE ACTION EN 1992 
COUNTRY/ 
PAYS 
B 
DK 
D 
GR 
E 
F 
IRL 
I 
L 
NL 
P 
UK 
NGO's 
TOTAL ACTION 1 
4.3% 
4.2% 
12.8% 
2.6% 
1.2% 
19.9% 
6.3% 
3.1% 
0.0% 
11.6% 
0.0% 
25.1% 
8.9% 
100.0% ACTION 3 
12.4% 
13.8% 
6.9% 
8.0% 
11.3% 
7.4% 
8.8% 
2.3% 
0.8% 
8.4% 
19.9% 
100.0% ACTION 4 
4.6% 
4.7% 
18.4% 
14.2% 
24.4% 
33.9% 
100.0% ICI 
8.8% 
5.5% 
6.0% 
6.8% 
2.2% 
70.6% 
100.0% CULT. EX, 
19.0% 
13.5% 
4.7% 
20.8% 
13.8% 
3.4% 
24.8% CEC 
5.7% 
4.1% 
15.5% 
0.7% 
6.3% 
6.5% 
9.4% 
7.4% 
16.2% 
28.2% 
100.0% 100.0% LAT 
2.8% 
3.6% 
2.6% 
37.9% 
9.3% 
3.6% 
5.5% 
2.1% 
3.5% 
29.0% 
100.0% MED 
1.7% 
2.4% 
17.9% 
17.6% 
9.6% 
12.1% 
9.0% 
29.6% 
100.0% TOTAL 
6.6% 
6.7% 
7.9% 
3.4% 
14.9% 
8.6% 
7.3% 
5.6% 
1.3% 
3.1% 
2.1% 
11.6% 
20.9% 
100.0% 
^ 
AÇ 
Annex/Annexe 4.1 
PRIORITY ACTIONS IN THE YOUTH FIELD 
ACTIONS PRIORITAIRES DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA JEUNESSE 
NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS BY ACTION AND BY COUNTRY (PROVISIONAL FIGURES) IN 1992 
NOMBRE DE PARTICIPANTS PAR ACTION ET PAR PAYS (CHIFFRES PROVISOIRES) EN 1992 
COUNTRY/PAYS 
Belgique/Belgie 
Danmark 
Deutschland 
Ellas 
Espana 
France 
Ireland 
Italia 
Luxembourg 
Nederland 
Portugal 
United Kingdom 
non-definable EC/ 
non-précisés CE 
participants 
non EC/CE 
TOTAL Action I 
17 
33 
114 
2 
11 
67 
8 
32 
16 
61 
12 
50 
456 
79 
958 Action III 
433 
604 
374 
96 
328 
266 
619 
33 
6 
-
164 
610 
-
-
3,533 Action IV 
12 
8 
38 
6 
7 
13 
18 
6 
2 
7 
3 
23 
-
-
143 Cult. Ex. 
35 
70 
13 
55 
74 
17 
47 
21 
4 
15 
26 
72 
-
-
449 
Ab 
Annex/Annexe 4.2 
PRIORITY ACTIONS IN THE YOUTH FIELD 
ACTIONS PRIORITAIRES DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA JEUNESSE 
EXCHANGES WITH CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 
ECHANGES AVEC LES PAYS D'EUROPE CENTRALE ET ORIENTALE 
NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS BY ACTION AND BY COUNTRY 
(PROVISIONAL FIGURES) IN 1992 
NOMBRE DE PARTICIPANTS PAR ACTION ET PAR PAYS 
(CHIFFRES PROVISOIRES) EN 1992 
COUNTRY/PAYS N° PARTICIPANTS 
Belgique/België 95 
Danmark 3 
Peutschland 151 | ARMENIA/ARMENIE 30 
Elias 15 BELORUSSIA/BIELORUSSIE 77 
Espana 47_ GEORGIA/GEORGIE 25 
FranCe — RUSSIA/RUSSIE 381 
Ireland 55 UKRAINE/UKRAINE 79 Italia 32 
Luxembourg -
Nederland 38 
Portugal __5 
United Kingdom 157 
Total eligible countries 592 
Total pays éligibles 
TOTAL EC/CE 623 T . _ .. . . '"_ 
Total other countries 15 
Total autres pays ] 
Il _^_ | TOTAL PARTICIPANTS 1,230 | 
^ 
Annex/Annexe 4.3 
PRIORITY ACTIONS IN THE YOUTH FIELD 
ACTIONS PRIORITAIRES DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA JEUNESSE 
EXCHANGES WITH LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES 
ECHANGES AVEC LES PAYS D'AMERIQUE LATINE 
NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS BY ACTION AND BY COUNTRY (PROVISIONAL FIGURES) IN 1992 
NOMBRE DE PARTICIPANTS PAR ACTION ET PAR PAYS (CHIFFRES PROVISOIRES) EN 1992 
COUNTRY/PAYS N° PARTICIPANTS J __ | 
Belgique/België y ARGENTINA 42 
BOLIVIA 30 Danmarlc 28 BRAZIL 68 
Deutschland 44 ÏÏ^LT. 5i 
-, _J COLOMBIA 36 
Ellas 13 j COSTA RICA 29 
"7 - 7Z 1 ECUADOR 31 
EsPana 191 EL SALVADOR 20 
France 55 GUATEMALA 16 
' -H2_— HONDURAS 27 
Ireland 25 | MEXICO 37 
- __^J NICARAGUA 24 
Italia il PANAMA 22 
Luxembourg 4 ™RAGUAY « 
Nederland 34 URUGUAY 57 
VENEZUELA 25 Portugal 55 | 
United Kingdom 27 
Total eligible countries 595 
Total pays éligibles 
TOTAL EC/CE 490 : ~ " 
Total other countries 7 
Total autres pays 
| Il 1 TOTAL N° PARTICIPANTS 1.092 
M 
Annex/Annexe 4.4 
PRIORITY ACTIONS IN THE YOUTH FIELD 
ACTIONS PRIORITAIRES DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA JEUNESSE 
EXCHANGES WITH MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES 
ECHANGES AVEC LES PAYS MEDITERRANEENS 
NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS BY ACTION AND BY COUNTRY 
(PROVISIONAL FIGURES) IN 1992 
NOMBRE DE PARTICIPANTS PAR ACTION ET PAR PAYS 
(CHIFFRES PROVISOIRES) EN 1992 
COUNTRY/PAYS N* PARTICIPANTS | 
Belgique/België 27 
Danmark 5 
Deutschland 29 ALGERIA/ALGERIE 43 
Elias 7 M0R0CC0/MAR0C 56 
Espana , 13 TUNISIA/TUNISIE 60 
France 49_ 
Ireland 1 
Italia 41 
Luxembourg -
Nederland 9 
Portugal 26 
United Kingdom 6 
Total eligible countries 159 
Il Total pays éligibles __ 
TOTAL EC/CE 243 
Total other countries 10 
Total autres pays J 
1 || IQTAL N° PARTICIPANTS 412 j 
A') 
ISSN 0254-1475 
COM(93) 521 final 
DOCUMENTS 
EN 16 05 04 
Catalogue number : CB-CO-93-557-EN-C 
ISBN 92-77-60143-4 
Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 
L-2985 Luxembourg