P6_TA(2005)0525
Human rights and press freedom in Tunisia
European Parliament resolution on human rights and freedom of the press in Tunisia and evaluation
of the World Summit on the Information Society held in Tunisia
The European Parliament ,
— having regard to Article 2 of the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement between the European
Union and Tunisia (1),
— having regard to its previous resolutions on the human rights situation in Tunisia, and in particular its
resolution of 29 September 2005 (2),
— having regard to the Commission Communication of 21 May 2003, entitled ‘Reinvigorating EU actions
on human rights and democratisation with Mediterranean partners ’(COM(2003)0294),
— having regard to the Commission Communication of 11 March 2003, entitled ‘Wider Europe —Neigh-
bourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours ’(COM(2003)
0104),
— having regard to the Commission Communication of 12 April 2005, entitled the ‘Tenth Anniversary of
the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: A work programme to meet the challenges of the next five years ’
(COM(2005)0139),
— having regard to the EU guidelines on human rights defenders, adopted by the Council in June 2004,
— having regard to the resolutions of the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly adopted in Cairo
on 15 March 2005 and Rabat on 21 November 2005,
— having regard to the Barcelona Summit of 27 and 28 November 2005, which brought together the
Heads of State of the European Union and of the Mediterranean partner countries,
— having regard to the statement of 13 September 2005 by the Presidency of the European Union on the
obstacles placed in the path of the activities of the Tunisian Human Rights League (LTDH), and thesteps taken following the prohibition of the Congress of the LTDH,
— having regard to the statements made by the Council and the Commission at Parliament's sitting on
13 December 2005,
— having regard to its resolution of 23 June 2005 on the information society (
3),
— having regard to the conclusions of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) held in Tunis
from 16 to 18 November 2005,
— having regard to Rule 103(4) of its Rules of Procedure,
A. whereas Tunisia was the first Mediterranean country to sign an association agreement with the Euro-
pean Union, and whereas Article 2 of that agreement states that the domestic and international policiesof the parties must be guided by respect for human rights and democratic principles,
B. whereas the EU's neighbourhood policy is based on a mutually recognised commitment to what are
regarded as shared values, such as democracy, the rule of law, good governance and respect for humanrights,
C. pointing out, in that connection, that Tunisia and the EU have jointly drawn up an action plan which
sets priority actions, including the strengthening of reforms to safeguard democracy and the rule of lawand, in particular, the promotion of freedom of expression, freedom of opinion, freedom of associationand freedom of assembly,
(1) OJ L 97, 30.3.1998, p. 2.
(2) Texts Adopted of that date, P6_TA(2005)0368.
(3) Texts Adopted of that date, P6_TA(2005)0260.23.11.2006 EN C 286 E/495 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 15 December 2005
D. whereas there is an inconsistency between the aim of the summit and certain incidents which took
place at the summit, in particular the conduct of the Tunisian security services vis-à-vis a EuropeanCommissioner and Members of the European Parliament and the disruption of the ‘human rights ’
workshop organised by the European Commission, in the presence of the European Parliament del-egation; welcoming, in this connection, the steps taken by the Council to draw to Tunisia's attentionits undertakings with regard to respect for human rights and democratic principles,
E. whereas there were many incidents during and in the weeks leading up to the WSIS, including cancel-
lation of the citizens' summit, attacks on journalists and human rights activists, the failure by theTunisian authorities to respond to representations made concerning hunger strikers and imprisonments
linked to the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs), the verbal attacks to which
European parliamentarians were subject during the Summit and the deliberate sabotage of interventionsby persons accredited by the United Nations —incidents which hampered freedom of expression and
seriously damaged the country's image,
F. whereas the WSIS process is continuing after the Tunis Summit, which has produced positive results
and opened a new stage, building on the conclusions of the second phase,
G. whereas the principles and main objectives of the WSIS remain the following:
— building the information society on the basis of human rights and fundamental freedoms;
— combating the digital divide and seeking resources for action plans to foster development;
— developing Internet governance arrangements which are more balanced, pluralist and representative
of the States involved, and meeting the new technological challenges (spamming, data protection,etc.),
H. noting the importance it attaches to the concrete implementation of the action plan, the allocation of
the relevant funds and the participation of civil society, including local communities, business and non-governmental organisations, in the information society,
1. Notes that Tunisia and the EU have been linked since 1998 by an association agreement, Article 2 of
which contains a human rights clause that constitutes an essential element of that agreement;
2. Welcomes the significant economic and social progress made in Tunisia, not least in the areas of
education and training, health and social security, and hopes that this progress will be accompanied byprogress in the areas of the strengthening of democracy, the rule of law and human rights, and in particular
freedom of expression and association and judicial independence, which form part of the Barcelona Process
acquis;
3. Calls on the Tunisian Government to abide by the undertakings on fundamental freedoms, including
freedom of expression and association, guaranteed in the international instruments ratified by Tunisia;
4. Points out the clear contradiction between the final Summit declaration, in which the States taking
part recognise that full and absolute respect for human rights and democracy constitutes the cornerstone ofthe information society, and the disregard of this undertaking by the host country;
5. Calls on the Tunisian authorities to allow the LTDH and the Union of Tunisian Journalists (SJT) to hold
their congresses and to release the European funds allocated to the LTDH, the Association of TunisianWomen for Research and Development (AFTURD) and Santé Sud; also calls on the Tunisian authorities to
cooperate fully with the Commission with a view to implementing promptly the ‘Modernisation of justice ’
project financed under the MEDA programme 2004-2006 which, as a matter of priority, should strengthensafeguards concerning judicial independence;
6. Calls, consequently, on the Council and the Commission to take, in cooperation with Parliament, the
tangible initiatives and appropriate measures provided for in this respect, at the imminent meeting of theEU-Tunisia Association Council, in order to discuss the human rights situation; points, in this connection, tothe initiative on the setting up of an EU-Tunisia Subcommittee on Human Rights within the framework ofthe Association Agreement;C 286 E/496 EN 23.11.2006 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 15 December 2005
7. Calls on the Council and the Commission to fully inform Parliament of the steps taken and the
decisions adopted at the forthcoming EU-Tunisia Association Council meeting; urges, in this context, theCouncil and the Commission to inform the public of the steps taken, in particular as far as human rightsdefenders are concerned;
8. Welcomes the fact that the European Union, speaking with a single voice, was able to adopt a firm
standpoint in the discussions in Tunis, at the same time acting as a driving force by means of its proposals,in particular as regards improved Internet governance and the implementation of the action plan; welcomesthe fact that it has been involved throughout this process and hopes that this method will continue to beemployed in the future;
9. Notes with satisfaction the decision to continue the process following the agreement reached on Inter-
net governance and the confirmation of the independence of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Namesand Numbers; welcomes the decision to opt for closer cooperation between governments with regard to theprinciple of equal treatment between States and the establishment of a Forum on Internet governance;emphasises that these advances reflect its call to develop balanced Internet governance arrangements;
10. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments
and parliaments of the Member States, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, the governmentof the Republic of Tunisia, the International Telecommunication Union, and the High-Level Summit Organ-izing Committee and Executive Secretariat of the WSIS.
P6_TA(2005)0526
Promoting and protecting consumers' interests in the new Member States
European Parliament resolution on the promotion and protection of consumers' interests in the
new Member States (2004/2157(INI))
The European Parliament ,
— having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
(A6-0378/2005),
A. whereas a high level of consumer protection and consumer confidence is a precondition for a well
functioning internal market,
B. whereas the internal market has delivered tangible benefits for consumers in the EU, through lowering
prices and widening choice,
C. whereas the EU has ten new Member States, in most of which consumer protection is a relatively new
concern,
1. Notes with satisfaction that, overall, consumer protection in the ten new Member States has developed
in a positive way, raising standards, although much remains to be done;
2. Insists that the internal market will not function properly if consumers are less well protected in some
Member States than they are in others; recalls therefore that a high common level of consumer protection
across the Member States will promote cross-border transactions and will ensure that consumers takeadvantage of the internal market;
3. Recalls also the importance of Article 153 of the EC Treaty, which allows Member States to maintain
or introduce more stringent protective measures;
4. Calls on the Commission to conduct a screening exercise to look in detail at the structures of con-
sumer organisations and consumer policy in the new Member States;23.11.2006 EN C 286 E/497 Official Journal of the European Union
Thursday 15 December 2005