COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 
COM(94) 637 final 
Brussels, 14.12.1994 
Proposal for a 
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) 
amending for the seventh time Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 
establishing a support system 
for producers of certain arable crops 
(presented by the Commission) 

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 
The agreements reached under the GATT between the Community and certain non-
member countries in the oilseeds sector provide that, in the event of 
enlargement, the Community's oilseeds maximum guaranteed areas must be 
adjusted accordingly. 
As a result of the accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the Union, 
the necessary adjustments must be made. 
Proposal for 
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No /95 
Of 
amending for the seventh time Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 
establishing a support system 
for producers of certain arable crops 
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, 
Having regard to the Act of Accession of Norway, Austria, Finland and 
Sweden^), and in particular Article 169(2) thereof, 
Whereas, within the framework of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 
(GATT), the European Community has concluded agreements with certain third 
countries on certain oilseeds; whereas those agreements were approved in 
Council Decisions 93/355/EEc(2) and 94/87/EC<3); whereas those agreements 
have been applied within the framework of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92^), 
as last amended by Regulation (EC) No . ,./94^); 
Whereas the aforementioned agreements provide that in the event of an 
enlargement of the Community the area used to calculate the oilseeds 
maximum guaranteed area is to be increased by an area not greater than the 
average area harvested in each new Member State in the three years 
immediately preceding accession; 
Whereas it is necessary to allocate to the new Member States national 
reference areas for oilseeds; 
(1) OJ NO C 241, 29.8.1994, p. 21. 
(2) OJ No L 147, 18.6.1993, p. 25. 
(3) OJ No L 47, 18.2.1994, p. 1. 
(4) OJ No L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 12. 
(5) OJ No L , 94, p. 
Whereas, pursuant to Article 2(3) of the Treaty of Accession^6), the 
institutions of the Union may adopt before accession the measures referred 
to in Article 169 of the Act, those measures entering into force subject to 
and on the date of entry into force of the Treaty, 
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: 
Article 1 
Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 is hereby amended as follows: 
1. In Annex IV "5 128 000" is replaced by "5 484 000". 
2. The following is added to Annex V: 
(in '000 ha) 
Member State 1994/95 1995/96 
and subsequent 
years 
Austria 
Finland 
Sweden 149 
70 
137 
Article 2 
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day.of entry into force of the 
Treaty of Accession. 
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in 
all Member States. 
Done at Brussels, For the Council 
The President 
(6) OJ No L. 
^ 
Financial Statement 
1. BUDGET HEADING : B 1 - 1052 APPROPRIATIONS: ECU 2 177 million 
2. TITLE : Proposal for a Regulation amending for the seventh time Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 
establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops 
3. LEGAL BASIS : Article 169 of the Treaty of Accession (Sweden, Finland, Austria) 
4. AIMS : To fix the national reference areas for oilseeds for the new Member States 
5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
5.0 EXPENDITURE 
- CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET 
(INTERVENTIONS) PERIOD OF 12 MONTHS 
(ECUm) 
133.6 CURRENT FINANCIAL YEAR 
(1995) 
(ECUm) 
62.8 FOLLOWING FINANCIAL YEAR 
(1996) 
(ECUm) 
127.3 
1997 
5.0.1 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE 
5.1.1 ESTIMATED REVENUE 129.0 1998 
129.0 1999 
129.0 2000 
129.0 
5.2 METHOD OF CALCULATION 
Austria 
Finland 
Sweden 149 000 ha 
70 000 ha 
137 000 ha 88% 
88% 
88% ECU 417/ha 
ECU 240/ha 
ECU 342/ha 1.207 (DR) 
1.207 (DR) 
1.207 (DR) 
TOTAL ECU 66.0 million 
ECU 17.8 million 
ECU 49.8 million 
ECU 133.6 mi I Iion 
The above calculation is for the 1995/96 marketing year. Half the expenditure is against the 1995 budget 
and half against the 1996 budget. 
For subsequent marketing years, the calculation is identical, but allows for a rotational set-aside rate of 
15% instead of 12%. 
6.6 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM APPROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? 
NO 
6.1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF THE CURRENT BUDGET ? 
NO 
6.2 WILL A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET BE NECESSARY ? 
YES 
6.3 WILL FUTURE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE NECESSARY ? 
YES 
COMMENTS : 
A letter of amendment or an SAB will be proposed by the Commission to take account of the costs linked to 
the enlargement of the Union 

ISSN 0254-1475 
COM(94) 637 final 
DOCUMENTS 
EN 1103 
Catalogue number : CB-CO-94-662-EN-C 
ISBN 92-77-83871-X 
Office for Official Pablicatioiis of the European Communities 
L-2985 Luxembourg