ARCHIVESHISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(76)724
Vol.1976/0219

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement(CEE,Euratom)n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernantl'ouvertureaupublicdesarchiveshistoriquesdelaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement(CE,Euratom)n°1700/2003du22septembre2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003,p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation(EEC,Euratom)No354/83of1February1983
concerningtheopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropeanEconomic
Community andtheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983,p.1),as
amendedbyRegulation(EC,Euratom)No1700/2003of22September2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003,p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary,classifieddocuments inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformitywithArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung(EWG,Euratom)Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar1983überdieFreigabederhistorischen ArchivederEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom)Nr.1700/2003vom22.September2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003,S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich.Soweit
erforderlich,wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenanntenVerordnungfreigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COM(76)724final.
Brussels.6January1977*
ReportbytheCommissiontotheCouncilconcerning
thequantitiesofrawtobaccofromthe1973croptaken
overbytheintervention agencies
PROPOSALFORCOUNCILREGULATION (EEC)
layingdownspecialmeasuresinrespectofthe
Beneventanovarietyoftobacco
(submittedtotheCouncilbytheCommission)
COM(76)724final.

ReportbytheCommissiontotheCouncilconcerning
thequantitiesofrawtobaccofromthe1973croptaken
overbytheintervention agencies
UnderArticle13(l)ofCouncilRegulation (EEC)No727/70of21April1970
onthecommonorganization ofthemarketinrawtobacco(l),itisestablish­
edthat:
"Where,foravarietyoragroupofvarieties ,thequantitiestakenoverby
theintervention agenciesexceed,foraparticularcrop,astatedpercentage
ofproduction ,andinanycaseastatedquantity,theCouncilshallexamine
thesituationonthebasisofareportwhichtheCommissionshallsubmitto
itattheendofthemarketingyearandnotlaterthan30Aprilofthecal­
endaryearfollowingthatofthecrop".
Thepercentages andquantitiesinquestionwerefixedbytheCouncilin
CouncilRegulation (EEC)NoI469/7Oof20July1970(2).
Experienceintheoperationofthemarketorganization hasshownonceagain
thatitwasnotpossiblefortheCommissiontosubmitthisreportbeforethe
finaldate,i.e.30Apriloftheyearfollowingthatoftheharvestinques­
tion.Itshould,however,bementionedthatafterthe1974harvest,dueto
thespeeding-up ofbuying–inoperationsbytheintervention agency,theCom­
missionreceivedthefinaldatamorequickly.
Forthe1973crop,intervention figuresshowthatfortheBeneventanovariety
thequantitiesboughtinamountedto1469tofbaledtobacco.Thisfigure
mustbeconvertedtoquantitiesofleaftobaccoonthebasisoftheloss-of-
weightcoefficients usedforfixingpremiums,i.e.to1632t.Consequently ,
theupperlimitof20$ofproductionandthemaximumpermittedquantity
(l200t)wouldseemtobe"exceededforthatvariety.
Underthesecircumstances ,thesituationasregardsproductionanddisposal
oftheBeneventanovarietyshouldbeexaminedonthebasisoftheinformation
atpresentavailable.
a)OJNoL94of28.4.1970
(2)OJNoLI64of27.7.1970

-2-
1.Trends inarea under cultivation andinproduction (seeAnnex I)
The area onwhich theBeneventano variety isgrown ,which covered about
5500habetween 1966 and1969 »wassuddenly reduced in1970 (3900ha)
and then remained ataround 3000 ha "between 1971 and 1973 «In1974 it
increased to3900haandreached4700hain1975 *
Production trends ,ontheother hand ,tend tofluctuate ,because yields
vary soconsiderably (IO.5to18.1 q/ha):during thelast tenyears ,the
highest production (1968)was8000 tandthelowest (1971 )was 3700t.
Production amounted to4903 tin1973 ,and to5100 tthefollowing year ,
but65OO tareforecast for1975*
2.Structure ofproduction (seeAnnexes IIIandIV)
TheBeneventano variety ,which iscultivated exclusively intheMezzogiorno
(Provinces ofBenevento (88%)andAvellino )ischaracterized by:
-avery lowyield (average over 1970 -74=about 13q/ha),
-cultivation onland ofless than average fertility where other
crops cannot begrown with economically worthwhile results ;
however ,theattempt toreplace theBeneventano variety by
other varieties (Kentucky ,Badischer Geudertheimer ,Paraguay
andBright )proved tobedifficult although very encouraging
from thepoint ofview ofquality ;
-"coltivatori diretti "(small growers )(about 8000)onsmall plots ,
58%ofwhom arelinked with theMonopoly Agencies and42$with the
cooperatives ;
-high labour intensiveness (71%ofproduction costs )compared -with
other varieties oftobacco .
./•

-2a-
3.Disposalofproduce(seeAnnexII)
1973crop
Foraproducrionof4903"tofleaf"tobaccointervention buyingamounted
to1469tofbaledtobacco,corresponding to1632tofleaftobacco
(33-3$ofproduction).Salestonon-Italianprocessorsamountedto
about600t.TheItalianMonopolyconsequently boughtinquantities
corresponding to2668tofleaftobacco(54-4%ofproduction).
1974crop
Themarketingofthiscropledtototalintervention buyingof3055"t»
ofwhichabout1351toftheBeneventano variety.
ThequantitiesoftheBeneventanovarietyboughtintointervention from
the1974cropmustalsoexceedthetwolimitsreferredtoinArticle13
ofthebasicRegulation.
Furthermore ,estimatesofintervention buyingfromthe1975cropshowasubstantialincrease(about2200t).
Itisinteresting tonotethatallthequantitiessentintointervention
derivefromassociations ofproducers(cooperatives ).Theproceedsfrom
salesbytendereffectedin1974and.1976wereonlysufficienttocover
storagecosts(average2years),whichmeansthatexpenditure onbuying-in
oftobaccoattheinterventionpriceplusotherinterventioncosts(placing
instorage,removal,financing)representanetlossfortheEAGGF.
II.Itshouldbenotedthatthisisthethirdconsecutive reportontheposition
oftheBeneventanovarietypresentedbytheCommissiontotheCouncilandthat
-thepolicypursuedinrecentyearstorestorethebalanceofsupplyand
demandandimprovethesaleofthisvarietybymeansofpremiums,prices
anarefundshasnothadtheanticipatedresult;
-stocksheldbytheintervention agencyhavereachedacriticallevel(l351"tfromthe1974cropandabout2200tfromthe1975crop);
producerorganizations inItalyarestronglyopposedtothesaleof
thesequantitiesbytenderarguingthatthiswouldcreateadditional
difficulties indisposingofthisvarietyontheworldmarket;
-thedisposaldifficultiesaffectonlytheassociations ofproducerswhich
wasinfactencouragedbythecreationofEAGGFwhichprovidedassistance
towardsthenecessaryinvestmentinprocessingequipment),t\hichinthese
less-favoured areasoftheMezzogiomopermitthebestreturnfromagri­
culturalactivity.Furthermore ,atthepresenttimethisregionhasnovalidalternatives :

-3-
–itisparticularly worthyofnotethatafterthe1974harvestthese
associations ofproducersmadeaconsiderable efforttocarryouta
programmeofchangetoothervarieties.However,theimpactofthis
effortwaslimitedduetothepsychological resistanceoftheproducers
(traditionally attachedtotheBeneventanovariety)andalsoduetothe
extentofthetechnical,economicandorganizational problemsinvolved.
Thesituationdescribedabovecallsfortheapplication ofthespecialmeasureslaiddowninArticle13(5)ofRegulation (EEC)No727/70inordertorestorea
lastingequilibrium betweensupplyanddemandinrespectoftheBeneventano
variety.
TheCommissionholdstheviewthatallthemeasuresenvisagedshouldresult
inaprogrammecoveringthreeharvestsinordertoreduceproductionofthe
Beneventanovarietybyatleast50%and.therebyrestorethebalanceof
supplyanddemand.
III.TheCommissionproposesthattheCounciladoptthefollowingprovisionsin
respectofthreesuccessivecropsstartingwiththe1977crop,namely:
–applicationofthespecialmeasuresprovidedforinArticle13(4)
(a)loweringoftheinterventionpricelevel;
(b)restrictionofthequantitiessentintointervention ;
-the/rrantin.?ofspecialaidforeachhectarewhichiswithdrawn fromthe
productionoftheBeneventano varietyandreplantedwithanothervariety,
(cf.draftregulationannexedhereto).
1.Inordertodiscourageproductionsufficiently torestorethebalance
betweensupplyanddemand,theCommissionproposes:
-aconsiderable dropintheinterventionpriceforleaftobacco(10c/o)
resultinginadropofabout8.5%inthederivedinterventionprice;
secondlyagradualreductioninthequantitative disposalguarantees
(buyingintointervention )forallqualitiesofthevarietyinquestion;
fromthe1977harvestonwardsandonthebasisofthequantities fromthe
1975cropplacedinintervention (anestimated2200t),itisproposed
tolimitsuchquantities (75iafor"the1977crop,50$forthe197ocrop
and25forthe1979crop,soastoreachamaximumlimitonintervention
buyingfromthe1979cropofabout500t.Thisreductionmustapplytoeach
cooperativeinproportiontothequantitiesplacedinintervention fromthe
referencecrop.
Allthesemeasurescombined,resultinginalossinrevenueofabout300u.a./ha
\,cf.(a)below),providesufficientdiscouragement andshouldresultinproducers
GraduallyabandoningtheBeneventanovariety.Inaddition,thequantitative
limitationofrecoursetointervention buyingrepresentsaguaranteethatwhen
oneormoreassociations ofproducersreducetheareasonwhichtheBeneventaho
varietyisgrown,theeffectwillnotbejeopardizedorevencancelledoutbya
contradictory policycarriedoutbyothers.
1•/

-4-
With regard ,totheassessment ofthe "foreseeable consequence onemployment
and .thestandard ofliving oftheproducers concerned "(Article 13(6)fol­
lowing theapplication ofthe special measures proposed ,theCommission con­
siders that they must "beexamined from the point ofview of:
(a)losses inincome perhaasaresult ofthereduction inthederived
intervention price and .theceiling onthequantities accepted for
intervention .
Derived intervention price u.a .1725x14q/ha=2415u.a./ha
u.a .2415-8.5 JS=2 210u.a./ha
Loss inrevenue u.a .2415-2210u.a.= 205u.a./ha.
Account must also hetaken ofthefact that certain quantities (about 57°)i
due inparticular toyield variations ,will nolonger benefit from thegua­
rantee ofintervention buying .This will result inadrop ofabout 100u.a .
inrevenue per hectare .
Total loss inrevenue ;205u.a .+100u.a .=305u.a ./ha.
(b)Consequences foremployment
Theapplication ofthe special measures will affect theprocessing
activity oftheproducer associations ,wit]jL consequences onthelevel
ofemployment which itisdifficult toassess .Bythegranting of
special aid forchanging toother varieties theCommission isensuring
that the processing activity ofthese tobacco associations will be
maintained ,thus safeguarding the level ofemployment .
TheCommission proposes granting special aid paid once only for each hectare
which isfinally withdrawn from thecultivation oftheBeneventano variety
andreplanted with other tobacco varieties .Itisenvisaged that atthe
rate ofabout 500/600hareplanted with different varieties every year ,
attheendofthree years 1500/1800hawill have been withdrawn from the
Beneventano variety ,representing almost half theproduction ofrecent years .
(a)Theamount ofthespecial aidtotals 500u.a ./ha,made upasfollows :
-compensation of300u.a ./hatocover loss ofrevenue (seeIII-1-a,p.5)
-flat-rate contribution of200u.a ./hatowa.rds theinitial cost ofchanging
varieties (technical assistance ,plants ,sales promotion ,etc.);
0)Thespecial aidisgranted from the1977 harvest onwards ,toproducers
ofBeneventano tobacco whoagree toreplant all orpart ofthearea devoted
tothis variety atthe1976 harvest .However ,inview ofthefact that
that portion ofproduction sent into intervention comes from producers
associated incooperatives ,consortiums ofcooperatives orother associa­
tedbodies operating asproducers andprocessors ,itisproposed that the
special aidshould bepaid direct tothese associations .Inaddition ,so
that theproposed measure canguarantee effective compensation forthe
loss ofincome due totheapplication ofthe "special measures ",part of
thespecial aid (60fo)should bepaid toproducers inproportion totheir
cultivated area .

-5-
(o)Inordertoensureeffectivecontroloftheproposedprogrammeof
varietalchangeover,theareassownforthe1976crop"byeachpro­
ducers'association asregisteredwiththeItalianIntervention Agency
(AIMA)should "betakenasa"basis.Theaidwouldbegrantedonlyafter
verification "bytheAIMAthattherewasanactualreductioninthearea
sownwiththeBeneventanovariety,forthefirstyearinrelationtothe
areasownin1976andforsubsequentyearsinrelationtotheareaofthe
precedingyear.
(d)TheCommissionalsoinformstheCouncilofitsintention:
-torefuseallfinancing "bytheEAGGFGuidanceSectionofanyproject
bearingontheproductionorprocessingofBeneventano tobacco;
–toproposeattheendofthethree–yearchangeover programme,thatthe
quantitative ceilingonthequantitiesoftobaccotakenoverbytheinterventionagencies(CouncilRegulation (EEC)No1469/70)shouldbe
revisedonthebasisofproductionin1979-
(e)Estimatedexpenditure onfinancingtheprogrammecouldbeintheorder
of250/300000u.a.peryear(5/6OOhareplantedannually)makingatotal
of0.75/0«90mu.a.forthethreeyears.
However,theproposedprogrammeimpliesaveryconsiderable reductioninthe
quantitiessentintointervention (from2200ttoabout500t)sincethese*
alwaysresultinveryhighnetlossespertonnefortheEAGGF(estimatednet
lossesontobaccofromthe1974crop:about3112u.a./t).
Itisthuspossibletoestimatethattheproposedprogramme,whileration­
alizingtheBeneventano market,couldeveninvolvesavingsfortheEAGGP.
♦

i-rea(ha)
Yi«ld(çt/ha)
Production(t)I
f
«B27EV2ÏTAN0
I
»
*'19641965196619671968
3.2??4.7225.42*I
5.8635.6?6
f14,413,212,2
11•
12,414,3
4.655
I6.302£.641«7.2768.060
ηAnnexI
1969
5.^90
10,5
5.679■1970
3.894
13,7
5.3381971
2.868
12,9
3.7031972
3.075
12,5
3.8461973
2.802
17,5
4.9031974
3.879
13,2
5.133197V.
4.734
13,7
6.472

TOBACCO
A)ionnndsale
(asatOctober1976)AnnexII
metrictons
1Salesto
Iother
MemberStatesSalestonon-
membercountries IBuying-inPurchase'by
theItalian
Monopoly
baled|leaf(1):|"baled|leaf(1)IbaledIleaf(1)leaf
2I3L–é 5217 iI2
24 2?I
ioηi
6o$!674.i
A.626
103 114 20 23553)614-2.952"|
281'*12 102i»841,934:.2.487
583 648- -|'1.469 .1.632i2.623
139|I154|ITS||83|!1.351;||1.501-j3.395Crop
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974Ho
14
n
m
η
«ιVariety
«i
Beneventano
«t
ηProduction
(leaftobacco)
5".338s
3.703,
3.846_
4.90S
5.133
B)Buvinr-inofthe1972crop
VarietyBuvinp^-in Maximumquantitiesfixed
byReg.(EEC)No1469/70j1973production
(leaftobacco)Ratio
buying-'in/
productionbaledtobaccoequivalentofleaftobacco(l)
Beneventano 1.469 1.-632 1.200 ^4^.903 33,3
(l)onthebasisofweightlosscoefficentsusedforfixingthepremiumsandderivedinterventionprices
Source:InformationsuppliedbyMemberStates

t
AnnexIII
à)Struot-areofproduotlon(sltuatlon1974)
'Monopolya^enoioangn'iu bvna
S*Giorgio626
Benevento 2354
2980
Cooperatives
CondorzioAgr.SA/VA/AV 768
CECA3(EnteSviluppo) 39}
Coop.Sxuaita(Casaî«uzzo&.) 800
Copp.Eurot&baoco 192
2153
Total 5133
B)Holdin/ragrowingBenevantano«
Provinces 1970 1971 1972 1973
Eenovento 6.0005-9856.1006.150
Avo11ino 1.900 2.000 2.000 2.100
\
Total7.9007.9856.1008.250
Source!Information•appliedbytradeorganizations42*

AnnexXv
"<tnpowerelementinthegrowingofBenoventano comparedwithother
varietiesgrownInthesamearea
Variety Averareprloehours/hahours/at
qt/hahours/hahours/at
1900• 54,2
1900 61,2
1100 55,0
1200 85,7Burley 35
Mary1and 32
Kentuoky 20
Beneventano 14
B'R<>rro"nationoflabourandotherfaotoraofproductionasapercenter*of
totalcostofproductionofBeneventanoandothervnrlet5as({situation1973)
■Varlet^labourfflotherfaotoraofproduction(4)
<
Burl®y 52,5 47,5'
Mary1and 58,5 '-^
Kentucky 41,5^
Beneventano 10,Q 292
Source1Informationsupplied "bytrad®organisations

PROPOSALFORCOUNCILREGULATION (EEC)NO
of
layingdownspecialmeasuresinrespectof
theBeneventano varietyoftobacco
THECOUNCILOPTHEEUROPEANCOMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishing theEuropeanEconomicCommunity
andinparticularArticle43thereof,
HavingregardtoCouncilRegulation No727/70of21April1970onthe
commonorganization ofthemarketinrawtobacco(l),aslastamended
bytheActofAccession(2),andinparticularArticle13(3)and(8)
thereof,
HavingregardtotheproposalfromtheCommission (3)»
HavingregardtotheOpinionoftheEuropeanParliament (4)»
(1)OJNoL34,28.4.1970,p.1
(2)OJNoL74,27.3.1972,p.14
O)OJNo
(4)OJNo
•A

Whereas theCommission report provided forinArticle 13(l)of
Regulation (EEC)No727/70shows that there hasbeen aconsiderable
increase inthequantities oftheBeneventano variety taken over by
theintervention agencies ;whereas these quantities greatly exceed
thequantities andthepercentage ofproduction fixed by
Council Regulation (EEC)NoI469/7Oof20July 1970 (l) above
which theprocedure laid down inArticle 13ofRegulation (EEC)
No727/70applies ;
Whereas ,despite avery careful price policy whereby thenorm price was
frozen forthree years andthepremium considerably increased ,themark­
eting situation hasworsened ;whereas thespecific measures provided for
should therefore beapplied ,that is,theintervention price level should
belowered andallquantities ofthis variety should bepartially excluded
from intervention buying ;whereas ,inorder torestore abalance onthe
market ,itisnecessary toapply these measures toseveral successive harvests ;
Whereas these measures will bring about aconsiderable reduction intobacco
growers *income andadrop inthelevel ofemployment ;whereas these dif­
ficulties should bealleviated bythe granting ofaid ;
Whereas this aid should befixed atalevel which offsets the loss inin­
come andhelps maintain tobacco –processing activities byencouraging the
growers tochange tovarieties more indemand onthemarket ;
Whereas ,since growers ofthis variety either belong toassociations or
cutlivate tobacco under contract forprocessors ,theMember States should beal­
lowed toapply the provisions ofthis Regulation directly toboth ofthese
categories ,with aview tofacilitating thechangeover programme and ad­
ministrative controls ;
Whereas ,since part ofthis aidisintended tooffset theloss inincome ,
thebeneficiaries should berequired topay part ofthe aiddirectly tothe
growers inproportion totheareas which they replant with other varieties ,
MAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION :
(1)OJNoLI64 , '27.7.1970 .p.35

Article1
AprogrammeofmeasuresapplicabletotheBeneventanovarietyoftobacco
shallbeadoptedforthe1977»197^and1979harvests.
Article2
Theintervention pricefortheBeneventano varietyoftobaccoshallberedu­
cedfrom90iato80%ofthecorresponding normprice.
Article 3
ThequantitiesofallqualitiesoftobaccooftheBeneventanovariety
harvestedin1977»197^and1979whichmaybethesubjectofintervention
buyingshallbelimitedto75/">50A>a^d25%respectively ofthecorrespond­
ingquantitiesofthe1975harvesttakenoverbytheintervention agency.
Article4
Specialaidperhectaresnailbegrantedattheirrequesttogrowerswho
plantwithothervarietiesallorpartoftheareawhichwasunderthe
Beneventano varietyoftobaccoforthepreviousyear'sharvestandsubject
tosupervision bytheintervention agency.
Article5
MemberStatesmayapplytheprovisions ofthisRegulationdirectly
bothtoorganizations ofgrowersfunctioning asproducersandproces­
sors,andtoprocessors whomakecontractswithgrowersfortobacco
cultivation ,onconditionthatthelatterreceivethebenefitsderiving
fromtheplantationofothervarieties.
Article6
1.TheleveloftheaidprovidedforinArticle4isfixedforthe1977
harvestat$00unitsofaccountperhectareplantedwithothervarieties.
2.Thisaidisintendedtocoverthelossofincomesufferedbythegrower
followingtheapplication ofthemeasureslaiddoxvninArticles2and3and
tocovertheinitialexpenditure entailedbythechangeover .
3-".TneretheoptionprovidedforinArticle5isexercised,thegrowershall
receive 60%oftheaidcalculatedinproportiontotheareaswhich
.vjbeenplantedwithothervarieties,inordertooffsetthelossinincome.
Article7
Thedetailedrulesfortheapplication ofthisRegulationshallbeadopted
inaccordancewiththeprocedurelaiddowninArticle17Regulation
(EEC)No727/70.

-4-
Article 8
The special aidreferred ,tomArticle 4shall "beconsidered ,forthe
purpose ofthefinancing ofthe common agricultural policy ,asaninter­
vention measure intended tostabilize theagricultural market .
Article 9
TheCouncil ,acting byaqualified majority onaproposal from theCommission ,
shall ifnecessary adjust theamount oftheaid forthe1978 and1979 harvests .
Article 10
This Regulation shall enter into force on1Karch .1977 *
This Regulation shall bebinding inits entirety anddirectly applicable
inall Member States .
Done atBrussels For the Council

FINANCIAL STATEMENT1 :!
jjdatoi17-12.1976
|i.BiiDsi.TunscoîicLU'isp>item7010
-– u–' ■ 1 1■■
a.actioniSpecialmeasureforthe"Beneventano"varietytobacco
3.ukalHAMS,ArU13ofRegulation727/70 . I
4.OBJECTIVESt(pQestablisha"betterbalancebetweenofferanddemandandto
reducestocks.
5.FINANCIAL CC.'JSEQULNCE
5.0EXPENDITURE
–CHARGEDTOTHEECBUDGET
(RKi-ii:)us/ihtcrvamo;;s)FORTHEKARKKTIf.'GYEAHcurruntpi;jaj:ciàlyear
(JD) .I
iFOLLOWING FINANCIAL YEAR
L(77)
0,3niu-a. !0,3mu.a.
–CHARGEDTONATIONALADNINISTR.
-CHARGEDTOOTHERNATIONAL CROUPS
5.1RECEIPTS
-0aNR'jsotinc:^ofTHEEC
(levies/custom;i>jtifs)
-NATIONAL
1
10YEAR79YEARboypm
5.0.1PLURIA.VNUALPATTERNOFEXPENDITURE
5.1.1PLURIANNUALPATTERNOFRECEIPTS0 -0,2 -1,3
5.2KETiiODOFCALCULATION
seeannex
6.0FINANCINCPOHSIBLEKITHCREDITSINSCRIBEDINRELEVANTCHAPTEROFCURRiINTBUDGET?YES/SOC
:
'■-'M'-'-k^:i'fe^?^X^k20b2)c-
ïïïS^cx:
.i'L>ji.t ti.j',..;xiiTOKu'iX'rtiJBUDGirrS?
YES7BOI
-*
'viiesoamounts.!onotincludetheeffectofa
v.'hichhastendencytoincreasethoseamountsdoublerate
byalmost50ofconversion,|
I

Annex tofinancial statement
Method ofcalculation ofthe financial incidence ofthe
proposal foraregulation onaspecial aid for thenon-
replantation of"Beneventano "variety tobacco (art .13Reg.727 /70)
l)Outlay forthespecial aidproposed
mu.a .
Element ofcalculation (year ) 77 70 !1Ό 1
*_bO Total
600haat500u.a./ha 3
10,3 0,3 0,9
2)Economy atthelevel ofoutlay onpurchase –ntoclcing resulting from the
reduction ofauantities supplied for intervention :takinc account ofa
mean net loss totalling 3 2Γ
Imu.a *
Element ofcalculation (year ) 77 76 79 όοiTotal
1
5^0tx3112 u.a./t^ 1,7 1,7
1100 tx3112 u.a./t= 3,4 3,4
I63O tx3112u.a./t= 5,6 I5,1
Totals
SSSS=SSSSSSS==S==S2=SB ===SSS=:33S3SS :1,7 3,4 5^6 I10,2
3)Outlay Provided forthepremium ;taking account ofareplantation of
areas "Beneventano "that hasbeen removed andreplaced byother varieties
having amean yield of20q/haandanaverage premium of1.200 u.a./h.
■ IT1XI•Q,•
Element ofcalculation (year )
|777579 j60 Total
600hax2=1200 tx1200 u.a./t= 1,4 1,4
1?00 hax2=2400 tx1200 u.a./t= 2,9 2,9
lbOOhax2=36OO tx1200u.a./t=| 4,34,3
Y'";'cls1,4_2,94,3
sssssssasaasa8,6