24. Underlines the need for an effective EU communication strategy on climate change, covering proper
publicity for the latest scientific evidence on the effects of climate change, the costs of inaction, the provi-
sion of detailed information about the carbon content of all products and services, the policy proposals putforward by the EU, the current status of international negotiations, and the specific steps that will have tobe taken at the levels of the EU, the Member States and the individual citizen;
25. Calls for all of its relevant committees and delegations to work together closely on climate change,
so that its industrial policy, energy policy, transport, agriculture, research and development and other
initiatives are better coordinated with climate change targets, and so that climate change is regularly raisedat interparliamentary delegation level and in the context of the Transatlantic Legislative Dialogue;
26. Reiterates its continued dissatisfaction at the exclusion of its Members who are participating in EU
delegations from attendance at the EU coordination meetings, and calls for this to be resolved rapidly, if
possible before COP 12 in November 2006;
27. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments
and parliaments of the Member States, and the Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Conventionon Climate Change, with the request that it be circulated to all non-EU Contracting Parties.
P6_TA(2006)0020
Sustainable development strategy
European Parliament resolution on the environmental aspects of sustainable development
(2005/2051(INI))
The European Parliament,
— having regard to its resolution of 31 May 2001 on environment policy and sustainable development:
preparing for the Gothenburg European Council (1),
— having regard to its resolution of 28 February 2002 on the sustainable development strategy for the
Barcelona Summit (2),
— having regard to its resolutions of 16 May 2002 in preparation for the world summit on sustainable
development in 2002 (3),
— having regard to the Commission working document entitled ‘Integrating environmental considerations
into other policy areas — a stocktaking of the Cardiff process’ (COM(2004)0394),
— having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘The 2005 Review of the EU Sustainable
Development Strategy: Initial Stocktaking and Future Orientations’ (COM(2005)0037),
— having regard to the conclusions of the Gothenburg (15-16 June 2001), Barcelona (15-16 March 2002)
and Brussels (16-17 June 2005) European Councils,
— having regard to the revised Lisbon strategy adopted by the European Council of 22-23 March 2005,24.11.2006 C 287 E/185 Official Journal of the European Union
Wednesday, 18 January 2006EN
(1) OJ C 47 E, 21.2.2002, p. 223.
(2) OJ C 293 E, 28.11.2002, p. 84.
(3) OJ C 180 E, 31.7.2003, pp. 507 and 517.
— having regard to the Commission's strategic objectives for the period 2005-2009 ‘Prosperity, solidarity
and security’ (COM(2005)0012),
— having regard to Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July
2002 establishing the sixth Community action programme for the environment (1) and its thematic
strategies,
— having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and
the opinion of the Committee on Social Affairs and Employment (A6-0383/2005),
A. whereas the Johannesburg summit in September 2002 identified five essential areas where concrete
results are needed: health, energy, agriculture and biodiversity, ecosystem management, water and sani-tation,
B. whereas, despite the undertakings made at the Rio and Johannesburg summits in 1992 and 2002
respectively, the signatory States have not taken the measures required to reverse the current tendencyto overexploit resources and pollute the environment, or the dwindling of natural resources and theclimate change which are the most visible results of this failure,
C. whereas the number of natural climatic disasters has more than doubled in Europe since the 1990s and
global warming is set to continue, with ever more numerous and tangible events demonstrating its
impact on the viability of economies, ecosystems and human health,
D. whereas a new definition of growth is needed, based on responsible, efficient use of natural resources
and a change in patterns of production and consumption,
E. whereas sustainable development is a question of solidarity between the generations, and between the
countries of the North and the South, and whereas the European Union is therefore faced with a devel-
opment policy choice whereby the people of the developing countries can gain access to a better life,while at the same time protecting the earth's environment,
1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission is taking stock of the sustainable development strategy in
accordance with its undertaking; welcomes the sustainable development guidelines adopted by the Euro-
pean Council in June 2005; calls on the Commission to do everything it can to ensure that the strategy is
revised as soon as possible on the basis of those guidelines, and on the Austrian Council Presidency to takethe necessary steps to ensure that this revision can be adopted during the first half of 2006;
2. Considers it regrettable that the revision of the sustainable development policy was not carried out in
combination with the mid-term review of the Lisbon strategy; wishes to see the revised sustainable devel-opment strategy become the long-term strategy for Europe, defining the best political project capable of
achieving its goals for a sustainable world fifty years from now, and believes that the Union's other political
processes for the medium term, such as the Lisbon strategy, should be compatible with that long-termstrategy;
3. Stresses — in the light of limited financial resources — the need for an identical, efficient and
systematic monitoring and review procedure for the two strategies;
4. Considers it regrettable that most of the orientations contained in the second part of the Commission
communication fail to respond to the magnitude of the challenges noted in the first part of the communi-cation; stresses the inadequacy of some of the orientations, particularly as regards the fight against non-sustainable tendencies;24.11.2006 C 287 E/186 Official Journal of the European Union
Wednesday, 18 January 2006EN
(1) OJ L 242, 10.9.2002, p. 1.
Worsening of non-sustainable tendencies
5. Concurs with the Commission's observation that tendencies running counter to sustainable develop-
ment have become worse, whether they consist in overexploitation and pollution of natural resources, lossof biodiversity, aggravation of climate change, inequality and poverty, or the accumulation of public debt,both in the European Union and in third countries;
6. Supports the Commission's call for the setting of objectives to combat these negative trends; one
priority medium-term objective should be to achieve the call as formulated in the Treaty establishing aConstitution for Europe for the ‘sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth[…], a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and ahigh level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment’, an overarching objectivefrom which concrete intermediate objectives may be derived;
7. Believes that a strategy for sustainable development needs to permit the application of measures that
are adapted to local development requirements and to the limitations and conditions of the region;
Climate change, transport, clean energy sources and control of energy consumption
8. Notes that, despite the legislation adopted and the technical progress achieved by the EU in reducing
atmospheric pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, there is a risk that the Union will not attain the
Kyoto protocol objectives for 2012, due to the absence of suitable measures to curb the rise in road trans-port;
9. Is also concerned at the large and rapid increase in air transport and polluting emissions in that
sector; stresses that unless swift action is taken, the greenhouse gas reduction objectives will be jeopardised;
urges the Commission to take prompt action to reduce the climate impact from aviation by creating a
pilot emission trading scheme for the aviation sector for the period 2008-2012, covering all flights to andfrom any EU airport, and to ensure that instruments to tackle the full climate impact of aviation are intro-duced in parallel;
10. Calls on the Commission and the Council to step up their efforts to bring existing legislation into
line with the latest scientific knowledge and to put forward solutions designed to achieve a substantial
reduction in atmospheric pollution and greenhouse gas emissions in the EU by 30 % of 1990 levels by2020 and 80 % by 2050, recent reports having confirmed that countering climate change requires a largerreduction in emissions in Europe and the rest of the world;
11. Supports the Commission's proposal to transfer a large proportion of road transport to more envir-
onmentally friendly modes of transport; calls on the Commission, the various constellations within the
Council, and the European Council to take rapid measures to stabilise distribution among modes of trans-port at the 1998 level by 2010 at the latest; believes, in more general terms, that a more environmentallyfriendly mobility policy calls for a profound change of policy;
12. Deplores the fact that, according to studies, Europe's current use of natural resources is exceeding
biological capacity by more than double, which means that Europe is making disproportionate demands
on existing terrestrial and marine natural resources;24.11.2006 C 287 E/187 Official Journal of the European Union
Wednesday, 18 January 2006EN
13. Regrets the fact that most of the Member States continue to depend heavily on fossil fuels and
nuclear energy for their energy supplies; supports the medium- and long-term objectives as regards the
market share of renewable and clean energy sources; regrets the Commission's withdrawal of the proposalfor a Council directive which would have permitted lower taxes on certain mineral oils containing biofuelsand on biofuels themselves, although this measure was supported by Parliament;
14. Welcomes the Commission's intention to submit an action plan for biomass with a view to
promoting the use of biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuels; urges the Commission to propose measures
enabling solutions for developing organic energy crops in the EU;
Management of natural resources
15. Recognises that the benefits of the European Union's water protection and management policy are
becoming only slowly and patchily evident and will be more visible in the medium and long term; calls onthe Member States, especially those in the west and south of Europe, and the sectors concerned, in particu-lar the agricultural and tourism sectors, to undertake measures to reduce water abstraction and guarantee
water supplies for the various areas of human activity; calls on the Council and the Commission to
continue to take the necessary measures in the areas of water and pollution (nitrates, pesticides, hazardousand bioaccumulative substances, and substances that disrupt endocrine function);
16. Encourages the European Union to achieve the ambitious objective of reversing by 2010 the loss of
biodiversity in Europe and the world; deplores the fact that the decisions and measures adopted, at bothEuropean and international level, will not enable this objective to be achieved by the scheduled date, and
that many species of fauna and flora are threatened with extinction; calls on the Commission in conse-
quence to present an ambitious, coherent new European action plan, endowed with the necessary budgetto fulfil the objectives of protecting and restoring ecosystems and biological diversity in the EuropeanUnion and third countries; believes that further action is necessary to fully integrate biodiversity protectioninto all relevant EU policies, particularly agriculture, regional development, fisheries and developmentpolicy; calls on the Council and Commission to ensure that sufficient funds are allocated to the Natura
2000 network; furthermore, calls on the Commission to propose a system for the aquatic environment
along the lines of Natura 2000;
17. Calls on the EU and the Member States, in line with the Johannesburg criteria and other Union poli-
cies, to include, under the concept of sustainable development, the conservation of the environment and oflandscape, urban and historical resources which form a familiar environment and are in many cases asource of wealth;
18. Deplores the increase in the overall volume of waste, particularly packaging; calls on the Commission
to ensure that the thematic strategy on waste includes new provisions aimed at reducing at source theproduction of waste in the medium to long term;
Land use
19. Calls for the expansion of urban areas and the improvement of infrastructures (roads, railways, ports,
airports, canals, gas and oil pipelines, etc) to be undertaken on a basis of respect for cultivable land, forestsand protected areas; calls on the Commission, should it find it necessary, to build on the existing legislation
with a view to ensuring the optimisation of environmental impact assessments, the sustainability of the
trans-European networks, and the achievement of the objective of maintaining biodiversity up to 2010;24.11.2006 C 287 E/188 Official Journal of the European Union
Wednesday, 18 January 2006EN
20. Calls on the Commission to integrate soil protection into the Community's environmental measures;
once again draws attention to the final outcome of any soil degradation, namely desertification, which is
affecting large parts of the Union and has obvious effects in terms of poverty, loss of biodiversity, waterquality and climate change; recalls the vital role of forests in soil fixation, avoidance of erosion, CO
2
absorption and flood prevention;
21. Supports the Commission's proposal to present a thematic strategy on the urban environment, the
objective of which must be to improve the quality of urban areas in order to give European town-dwellers
a healthy living environment, particularly as regards air quality; takes the view that three areas take
priority: development of public transport that uses clean or less polluting technologies; promotion ofsustainable construction of an environmentally high quality (EHQ); and sustainable town planning thataims, inter alia, to prevent economic and social segregation and a reduction in green urban areas;
22. Notes that despite its undertakings, the European Union has still not succeeded in uncoupling
growth from the exploitation of natural resources; calls on the Commission to present proposals for
measures and regulations aimed at multiplying by 4 by 2010, and by 10 by 2025, resource and energy
efficiency in production and consumption;
23. Stresses that rarification, pollution and increasingly difficult access to natural resources and raw
materials constitute a threat to the maintenance of biodiversity, and will result in a rise in prices, themagnitude of which will destabilise more or less profoundly the economic and social systems of the Euro-pean Union and third countries, and in a risk of conflict; notes with regret, therefore, the lack of any
adequate response to this situation by the Commission and the European Union;
Public health
24. Deplores the gap between the assessment of the consequences of environmental degradation on
health, on the one hand, and the insufficiently bold measures proposed by the Commission in its European
Environment & Health Action Plan 2004-2010 (COM(2004)0416), on the other; takes the view that this
orientation is not consistent with a genuine sustainable development policy aimed a reducing health risksand guaranteeing the viability of our social welfare and health systems;
25. Greets with satisfaction the REACH proposal, the aim of which is to improve protection of human
health and the environment while maintaining competitiveness and promoting innovation in the Europeanchemicals industry; hopes that legislation will be adopted which is close to the Commission's initial
proposal; hopes that the date of entry into force of the new system envisaged for 1 January 2007 will not
be postponed;
International
26. Calls on the Member States to extend debt cancellation to more developing countries; takes the view
that environmental protection measures and mechanisms for the transfer of environmentally friendly tech-nologies should accompany this debt cancellation programme;
27. Calls on the EU to honour its commitments under the various international conventions and to take
the necessary initiatives to ensure that individual countries and the international community abide by the
commitments and obligations arising from the recent global negotiations having a direct or indirect rela-
tion to the sustainable development strategy (Kyoto, Monterrey, Doha, Johannesburg);24.11.2006 C 287 E/189 Official Journal of the European Union
Wednesday, 18 January 2006EN
28. Stresses that the revised strategy must clearly state that its objective is reform of the World Trade
Organisation (WTO) such as will make trade subordinate to sustainable development objectives and inter-
national commitments to environmental preservation and respect for the international conventions in thesocial field, including the standards laid down by the International Labour Organisation; calls on the Euro-pean Union to work towards recognition and transparent application of the precautionary principle withinthe WTO;
29. Welcomes the outcome achieved at the Montreal Conference, where all parties — including the
United States — endorsed the fight against climate change; stresses, however, that a great deal of progressremains to be made in this area; calls on those states that have not yet done so —in particular the UnitedStates — to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, which now has the force of law;
30. Calls for political recognition of the European Union's impact on consumption of global resources
— its ‘ecological footprint’ — which, according to independent studies, generates 17 % of humanity's totalresource demands from just 7 % of the world's population;
31. Calls for the external dimension of the EU sustainable development strategy to be the overarching
framework for ensuring the coherence of all EU policies which impact on the environmental resources and
sustainability policies of EU partner countries; further calls for the strategy to include specific assessment ofhow EU policies can assist developing countries in attaining the Millennium Development Goals by 2015;
32. Supports the Commission's proposal for the forthcoming ‘EU thematic Program for environment and
natural resources’ which should cover all EU partner countries (European Neighbourhood and Partnership
Instrument and Development Cooperation and Economic Cooperation Instrument) in order that initiatives
within the external dimensions of the Sustainable Development Strategy can be included in the next Finan-cial Perspectives for 2007-2013;
33. Stresses the strong links between poverty and the environment and the fact that the poorest are
often the principal victims of environmental degradation; notes that efforts to reduce poverty, primarily
through economic growth, often ignore the need to integrate environmental considerations into policiesfor combating poverty; recommends therefore that specific initiatives are taken to address these povertyand environment linkages within policies and programmes, and also that economic growth needs to be de-coupled from environmental degradation by promoting sustainable consumption and production, toaddress both the supply and the demand in developing countries;
34. Calls on the Member States and the European Union to promote within international bodies, and
above all the UN, a recognition of resources, particularly water, as global public goods;
Equipping ourselves with the tools for action
35. Welcomes the announcement by the British Presidency of the European Union that the Cardiff
process is to be relaunched; calls on the Council, with the help of the Commission, to adopt genuinemeasures to incorporate environmental protection in other policies;
36. Stresses the importance of incorporating the concept of sustainable development in all public policies
at national, regional and local level, and at the private level within businesses, associations and NGOs;
37. Stresses that the Aalborg Charter identifies cities as key agents in sustainable development; in order
to improve the EU's environmental performance, it is therefore essential to encourage sustainable and
coherent urban administration and to generalise best practice at local level, notably by means of exchange
networks among cities;24.11.2006 C 287 E/190 Official Journal of the European Union
Wednesday, 18 January 2006EN
38. Welcomes the Commission's introduction of impact assessments for all its decisions and legislative
proposals; calls on the Commission to ensure that the environmental and social aspects of this tool are
reinforced and taken into greater account from now on; recalls that this tool is an aid to political decisionmaking, but can and must never replace it;
39. Welcomes the adoption by the Commission and Eurostat of some 150 indicators, and their subdivi-
sion into three levels, as a means of evaluating implementation of the sustainable development strategyand gradual realisation of the objectives set; calls on the Commission and Eurostat to assess the indicatorsregularly with a view, if necessary, to bringing them into line with the way that issues and the environmentdevelop; calls on the Commission to ensure that greater account is taken of the environment in the list of
14 indicators for the assessment of progress on the Lisbon strategy; believes this list should also include a
biodiversity indicator;
Market instruments as incentives
40. Notes the Commission's proposal to supplement the traditional regulatory instruments with market
instruments such as cost internalisation, ecotaxes, subsidies and the emission quota trading system;
41. Supports the Commission's call for market prices to reflect the true cost of any given economic
activity, particularly in environmental terms, in order to change production and consumption patterns;
takes the view that measures to this effect must be rapidly taken and applied in the road transport sector
with a view to encouraging the use of collective transport;
42. Stresses that such a measure must take account of incomes, and balance needs and fundamental
rights and freedoms against the quality of the environment;
43. Insists that the Commission should, in its future proposals, take full account of Parliament's resolu-
tion of 8 September 2005 on new prospects and challenges for sustainable tourism in Europe (
1);
44. Stresses that the conditions for granting European subsidies and aid, particularly under the CAP,
must contribute to the implementation of the sustainable development policy; urges that all subsidies for
non-sustainable activities, including those in the areas of energy and agriculture, be discontinued as soonas possible;
45. Notes that increasing erosion and impoverishment of the soil and cultivated land are creating a long-
term threat to our capacity to ensure food supplies for our fellow citizens; advocates, therefore, that afuture reform of the CAP should propose moving towards a new balance of modes of cultivation, takingaccount of relevant experiments in other countries; believes that genetically modified plants and organismsdo not, under present circumstances, offer a satisfactory response to the problems arising from the use of
chemical substances in agriculture;
46. Supports the introduction of ecotaxes by the Member States; stresses that, like the other market
instruments, they are an essential tool for an effective pollution reduction policy;
47. Stresses that market instruments can still release considerable potential in the area of environmental
protection; emphasises, however, that such instruments, although necessary, are not in themselves suffi-
cient in order to pursue a policy of reducing pollution and protecting the environment; calls on theCommission to develop targeted proposals;
48. Calls on the Commission to recognise, encourage and support, in the Union, in third countries and
within international organisations, the development of new and more sustainable economic models such asthe social and solidarity-based economy and fair trade;24.11.2006 C 287 E/191 Official Journal of the European Union
Wednesday, 18 January 2006EN
(1) Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0335.
Innovations
49. Endorses the Commission's proposal to invest in innovation in the area of more environmentally
friendly technologies, with scientific and technical research being required to take account of environ-mental and social issues; finds it regrettable, however, that the Commission does not mention the share inGDP of the investment to be made in supporting the development of new environmental technologies;
50. Calls for the seventh framework programme for research to be implemented in such a way as to
ensure sustainable development in as many sectors as possible and to create high-quality jobs;
51. Stresses that innovation in the area of environmental technology is an essential motor of sustainable
development in the environmental sphere; points out, however, their limitations and the need to take
measures to change production, traffic and consumption patterns in order to meet the environmental chal-lenges faced;
52. Calls on the EU to step up its efforts and take the necessary decisions so that it can become the
world's foremost resource- and energy-saving economy; stresses that achieving those objectives wouldbring about greater autonomy and security in terms of resources and energy supplies, while also uncou-
pling economic growth from the exploitation of natural resources;
Application of the principles of sustainable development
53. Recalls that the ‘polluter pays’ and precautionary principles must be affirmed as the regulatory princi-
ples underpinning public policy on public health, food safety and consumer and environmental protection;
54. Calls on the Commission and the Council to give greater thought to the substitution principle, which
can be a powerful vector in stimulating research and development of new technologies that are more
mindful of health and the environment;
Informing and mobilising citizens and businesses
55. Takes the view that protecting the environment calls at the same time for information, awareness-
raising and education; takes the view that the strategy must be the result of a transparent process involvingthe citizens of Europe and that, in order for this to happen, the Aarhus Convention on access to informa-
tion, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters (
1) must be
fully implemented;
56. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to continue to develop environmental education
and to give it a full place on primary school curricula, and to put in place information and awareness-raising programmes directed at adults;
57. Calls for expectations to be fulfilled with regard to bringing the whole workforce into work, regard-
less of age and sex, in particular by making use of the opportunities for lifelong learning, in order to rein-
force the actions under the sustainable development strategy;
58. Calls for lifelong learning to be developed, taking greater account in vocational training of develop-
ment prospects for techniques and modes of production; stresses that this step constitutes a significant wayfor all workers, particularly salaried employees, to make new technologies their own, and thus adapt to achanging job market;24.11.2006 C 287 E/192 Official Journal of the European Union
Wednesday, 18 January 2006EN
(1) OJ L 124, 17.5.2005, p. 4.
59. Stresses that the sustainable funding of social security systems can only be achieved by enhanced soli-
darity between the generations; points up the particular importance of educating citizens in a responsible
manner as regards social and environmental issues; calls for the burden of labour costs to be reduced inMember States' tax systems; calls for greater coordination within Member States in order to reduce socialexclusion, more effectively guarantee social security for all European citizens, and achieve the same highecological standards everywhere;
Thematic strategies
60. Is delighted that the first thematic strategies have finally been presented; calls on the Commission to
ensure that all the thematic strategies announced are adopted as rapidly as possible and, at the latest, bythe summer of 2006;
61. Notes with satisfaction the adoption and revision of various Community laws, including those on
environmental protection; takes the view that a good number of them, particularly the reform of the CAPand fisheries policy, do not take enough account of sustainable development objectives and continue tofavour intensive production methods;
62. Calls on the Commission, in the context of its proposal for the revision of the sustainable develop-
ment strategy, to put forward more ambitious proposals for the monitoring of that strategy; stresses thatthe revised strategy must be subject to an annual assessment, as decided at the Gothenburg EuropeanCouncil in 2001; calls for the assessment to be complemented, halfway through and in case of need, bymeasures and proposals to ensure achievement of the goals originally set; welcomes the participation ofParliament in this assessment;
Conclusions
63. Welcomes the Commission's willingness to take measures to promote sustainable development; notes
with regret, however, the gap between declared intentions and proposed policies; takes the view that, given
the worsening state of the environment, the priorities for revision of the sustainable development strategy
must not consist mainly in coordination and knowledge-enhancement measures, but in proposals for clearmedium-and long-term measures and objectives, in instruments and in a regular control, monitoring andevaluation system;
64. Is firmly convinced that sustainable development represents a fundamental, crucial instrument for
the European Union, which will promote economic and social progress, improve the quality of life and
standard of living of its citizens and engender a new concept of politics in the service of liberating human
beings;
65. Calls for the financial perspective for 2007-2013 to make sufficient provision for appropriate action
to be taken at every level to combat unsustainable trends such as poverty, social exclusion and the conse-quences of the ageing of society; stresses that sustainable development must thus be a guiding principle forEU policies in all areas; recommends that the financial perspective provide for adequate funds to promotefull employment, social inclusion and the eradication of poverty and to strengthen social, territorial and
economic cohesion;
66. Stresses that the revised strategy implies above all a real change in our modes of production and
consumption, and involves reconsidering the aims of our economic activity;
67. Points out that failure to act will come at an increasingly high price, will have ever more considerable
direct consequences, and will make it even more difficult to implement the European Union's objectives asregards social progress, health and environmental protection, generating an intolerable burden for futuregenerations;
68. Asks to be formally consulted on the Commission's proposal for a review of the Sustainable Develop-
ment Strategy when it is published;
*
**
69. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.24.11.2006 C 287 E/193 Official Journal of the European Union
Wednesday, 18 January 2006EN