RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
of 24 April 2007
with observations forming an integral part of the Decision on the discharge for the implementation
of the budget of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2005
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
— having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year
2005 (1),
— having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Environment
Agency for the financial year 2005, together with the Agency's replies (2),
— having regard to the Council's Recommendation of 27 February 2007 (5711/2007 —C6-0080/2007),
— having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,
— having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial
Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (3), and in particular
Article 185 thereof,
— having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1210/90 of 7 May 1990 on the establishment of the
European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observationnetwork (
4), and in particular Article 13 thereof,
— having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the
framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC,Euratom) No 1605/2002 (
5), and in particular Article 94 thereof,
— having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee
on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0103/2007),
A. whereas the Court of Auditors stated that it obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts for
the financial year ended 31 December 2005 were reliable and that the underlying transactions, taken as a
whole, were legal and regular;
B. whereas on 27 April 2006 Parliament gave discharge to the director in respect of the implementation of
the Agency's budget for the 2004 financial year (6) and in the resolution accompanying the discharge
decision Parliament, inter alia,
— noted that surplus appropriations in 2004 had been committed for operations to be carried out in
2005, and that appropriations relating to staff expenditure were carried over; insisted that theAgency respect the principle of budget annuality as defined in the Financial Regulation and the ruleprohibiting carry over of appropriations relating to staff expenditure, in order to allow a correct andtransparent implementation of the budgets as set by the Budgetary Authority,15.7.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 187/107
(1) OJ C 266, 31.10.2006, p. 1.
(2) OJ C 312, 19.12.2006, p. 36.
(3) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006,
p. 1).
(4) OJ L 120, 11.5.1990, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1641/2003 (OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 1).
(5) OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.
(6) OJ L 340, 6.12.2006, p. 90.
— noted the weaknesses in checking and omissions found by the Court of Auditors in its audit of the
inventory;
General points concerning the majority of EU Agencies requiring individual discharge
1. Considers that the ever-growing number of Community Agencies and the activities of certain of them do
not seem to form part of an overall policy framework, and that the remits of some Agencies do notalways reflect the real needs of the Union or the expectations of its citizens, and notes that in generalterms the Agencies do not always have a good image or a good press;
2. Invites the Commission therefore to define an overall policy framework for the setting up of new
Community Agencies and to present a cost-benefit study before the setting up of any new agency, whilebeing careful to avoid any overlap of activities between Agencies or with the remits of other Europeanorganisations;
3. Calls on the Court of Auditors to give its opinion on the cost-benefit study before Parliament takes its
decision;
4. Invites the Commission to present every five years a study on the added value of every existing Agency;
invites all relevant institutions in the case of a negative evaluation of the added value of an Agency to takethe necessary steps by reformulating the mandate of that Agency or by closing it;
5. Considers it regrettable, given the growing number of regulatory Agencies, that the negotiations on the
draft interinstitutional agreement on the operating framework for the European regulatory Agencies havenot yet been concluded, and calls on the relevant departments of the Commission, in consultation with
the Court of Auditors, to do their utmost to ensure that the agreement is brought to a rapid conclusion;
6. Notes that the Commission's budgetary responsibility calls for closer linking of the Agencies to the
Commission; calls on the Commission and the Council to take all necessary steps to give theCommission a blocking minority in the supervisory bodies of the regulatory Agencies by 31 December2007 and to provide for such a minority from the outset when new Agencies are set up;
7. Invites the Court of Auditors to create an additional chapter in its Annual Report, devoted to all Agencies
to be discharged under the Commission's accounts in order to have a much clearer picture of the use ofEU funds by Agencies;
8. Recalls the principle according to which all Community Agencies, whether subsidised or not, are subject
to discharge by the Parliament, even where a discharge authority exists by virtue of their constitutivetexts;
9. Calls on the Court of Auditors to perform performance audits for all Agencies and to report back to the
relevant committees of Parliament, including the Committee on Budgetary Control;
10. Notes that the number of Agencies is constantly increasing and that, in accordance with the
Commission's political responsibility for the operation of the Agencies, which goes far beyond merelogistical support, there is an even higher need for the Directorates-General of the Commission chargedwith the setting up and monitoring of Agencies to develop a common approach to the Agencies;considers that a structure similar to the one created by the Agencies for coordination among the DGsconcerned would be a pragmatic way forward towards a common approach by the Commission on allmatters relating to the Agencies;
11. Invites the Commission to improve administrative and technical support to the Agencies, taking into
account the growing complexity of the Community's administrative rules and technical problems;L 187/108 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.7.2008
12. Notes the lack of a disciplinary body in any of the Community Agencies, and calls on the Commission to
take the necessary steps to ensure that such a mechanism is rapidly put in place;
13. Welcomes the considerable improvements in the coordination among the Agencies, which allows them
to tackle recurring problems and makes cooperation with the Commission and Parliament moreefficient;
14. Takes the view that the establishment by a number of Agencies of a shared support service aimed at
making their computerised financial management systems consistent with those of the Commission is ameasure that should be taken further and extended;
15. Calls upon the Agencies to improve their cooperation and benchmarking with actors in the field; urges
the Commission to adopt any measures it considers necessary to help the Agencies enhance their imageand raise the profile of their activities;
16. Calls upon the Commission to come up with a proposal to harmonise the format of the annual reporting
by the Agencies and to develop performance indicators which would allow a comparison of theirefficiency;
17. Invites the Agencies to present at the beginning of every year performance indicators against which they
could be measured;
18. Invites all Agencies to increasingly use SMART objectives which should lead to more realistic planning
and implementation of goals;
19. Agrees with the Court of Auditors that the Commission also bears responsibility for the (financial)
management of the Agencies; therefore, urges the Commission to monitor and where necessary directand help the management of the different Agencies, especially in relation to the proper application oftender procedures, transparency of recruitment procedures, sound financial management (underspendingand overbudgeting) and most importantly the proper application of the rules concerning the internalcontrol framework;
20. Considers that the Agencies' work programmes should express their contributions in operational and
measurable terms and that due consideration should be given to the Commission's Internal ControlStandards;
Specific points
21. Notes that the Agency committed nearly all the appropriations in its budget for the financial year 2005;
notes nevertheless that the carry-over rate (over 30 %) for commitments for its operating activities(Title III) is high; invites the Agency to ensure a reduction in carry-overs, whose volume hampers themanagement of the following year's appropriations, which subsequently creates delays in implementationor even increases them;
22. Notes that there is no description of the internal control systems and that the authorising officers have
not provided a formal description of the systems that they use for supplying and substantiating accountsinformation and the accounting officer has therefore still not been able to validate them; invites theAgency to remedy this;
23. Notes that there are still shortcomings in the authorising officer's annual activity report which does not
supply adequate information on the results of the year's activities in relation to the objectives established,the associated risks, the use of resources and the functioning of the internal control systems; asks theAgency to solve this problem;15.7.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 187/109
24. Notes that during the audit of the procedures for the recruitment of temporary staff, it was observed that
certain internal provisions concerning the joint nature of the selection committees and the inalterabilityof the selection criteria adopted beforehand did not comply with the provisions of the conditions ofemployment of other servants of the Communities; demands that in future the procedures forrecruitment should be fully respected;
25. Invites the Agency to respect evaluation criteria in procurement procedures;26. Considers the Agency to be a source of important environmental information for all EU institutions and
policy-making; notes with satisfaction that the Agency has been able to transform some complicated datainto clear conclusions and to communicate them to the public; acknowledges, in particular, theimportance of the report The European environment —State and outlook 2005 in providing user-friendly
information on the environment and pinpointing the key challenges facing the EU and Member States;
27. Encourages the Agency to continue its efforts to further develop its communication methods in order to
attract more media coverage for its findings and thus feed public debate on important environmentalissues, such as climate change, biodiversity and the management of natural resources;
28. Points out that the impact of environmental programmes is often hampered by the lack of assessment of
environmental impacts of other Community policies; invites the Agency to further develop its work inthe field of environmental impact assessment;
29. Requests that, before 1 January 2010 and every five years thereafter, the Agency commission an
independent external evaluation of its achievements on the basis of its founding Regulation and the workprogrammes decided by the Management Board; requests that the evaluation assess the working practicesand the impact of the Agency and take into account the views of the stakeholders, at both Communityand national level; requests further that the Management Board of the Agency examine the conclusions
of the evaluation and draft such recommendations to the Commission and Parliament as may be
necessary regarding changes in the Agency, its working practices and programmes, that the evaluationand the recommendations to the Commission and Parliament be made public, for example on theirwebsites, and that the funds needed to carry out the external evaluation shall be allocated through thebudget of the corresponding DG;
30. Emphasises the role of the Agency in the evaluation of the implementation of EU environmental
legislation.L 187/110 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.7.2008