ARCHIVESHISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(82)445
Vol.1982/0147

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement(CEE,Euratom)n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernantl'ouvertureaupublicdesarchiveshistoriquesdelaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement(CE,Euratom)n°1700/2003du22septembre2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003,p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation(EEC,Euratom)No354/83of1February1983
concerningtheopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropeanEconomic
Community andtheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983,p.1),as
amendedbyRegulation(EC,Euratom)No1700/2003of22September2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003,p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary,classifieddocuments inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformitywithArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung(EWG,Euratom)Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar1983überdieFreigabederhistorischen ArchivederEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom)Nr.1700/2003vom22.September2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003,S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich.Soweit
erforderlich,wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenanntenVerordnungfreigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COM (82) final
Brussels ,14July 1982
/*>y V
«3
\ ^ »/
V^' REPORT FROM THE
COMMISSION TOTHE COUNCIL
ONTHE VETERINARY INSPECTORATE
4
COM(82 )¥+5 final

RAPORT FROM THE
COMMISSION TOTHE COUNCIL
ONTHEVETERINARY INSPECTORATE
I.BACKGROUND
On6March1978theCommission presented totheCouncil acommunication on
aprogramme ofactivity intheveterinary ,animalhusbandry andanimal
protection sectors,together withrequestsforthestaffrequiredforsuch ,
work.
Inaresolution dated30May1978theCouncilapprovedtheguidelines contai­
nedintheCommunication and,onthequestion ofstaff,notedthat,fromthe
practical pointofview,theaccomplishment ofthetasksentrusted tothe
Commission andtheimplementation ofthemeasures provided forintheCommu­
nication calledforasubstantial increase inthestaffoftherelevant
departments .TheCouncilalsoaskedtheCommission tosubmit,withinthree
yearsoftheeffective implementation oftheinspection work,areportaccom­
panied,asappropriate ,byproposals onthefollowing :
(i)definitive guidelines withregardtoveterinary inspection ;
(ii)otherproblems whichmightariseinconnection withtheworktobecarried
outinthefieldsconcerned .
ItisinresponsetothisrequestthattheCommission submitsthefollowing
reporttotheCouncil.Inthisconnection itconsulted theheadsofthe
veterinary services on26February 1982.
II.STAFFING
Initsbudgetproposals for1979theCommission askedforatotalof9permanent
grade Apostsand12temporary grade Apostsforitsveterinary services .The
12temporary postsweregranted bytheCouncil (andallocated bytheCouncil
totheveterinary inspectorate ).Thesetemporary postsare,atpresent,the
onlypostsavailable totheveterinary inspectorate (discounting 1permanent
A/4,1Band3C).However,1temporary officialisassignedfull-time to
theanimalprotection sectoruntiltheCommission obtains apermanent gradeA
postfromtheCouncilforthissector.
Theheadsofveterinary services,atmeetings heldintheCommission andthe
Council,haveconfirmed thebroadlinesoftheprogramme ofworkreferredto
aboveandhavealsodefinedcertainaspectsingreaterdetail.

-2-
Forinstance,atRotterdam inJuly1981,wheretheCommission presented
awrittenreportexpressing itsawareness oftheproblemsbesetting the
progress ofharmonization ,sonecessary inthesefields,anditsintention
tosubmitanurgentproposaltotheCouncil,underthebudgetprocedure,
forthesecondstageofstaffreinforcement inlinewiththerequirements
setoutinits1978communication whichhasnotyetbeenfulfilled .Italso
declareditsintention toinclude arequestforthestaffrequiredtocarry
outthetasksimposeduponitinthemeantime ;thiswouldinclude agradeA
postforscientific research inconnection withanimalprotection (seeCom­
missionCommunication totheCouncil,14September 1981).
III.DUTIES
Generally speaking,thedutiesoftheveterinary inspectorate aretocarryout
thechebksprovided forin:
-Directive 71/118(freshpoultrymeat ),Article 5a;
-Directives 72/462(thirdcountries),Article 5,and77/96(examination
fortrichinae );
-Directive 77/99(meatproducts),Article 7.
Itisprobablethatthesedutieswillsoonbewidenedtoincludetheinspection
of"redmeat"establishments withintheCommunity (amendment ofDirective
64/433).
Inaddition,inspection workiscarriedoutundertemporary measures (e.g.
programme fortheeradication ofbrucellosis ,tuberculosis andleucosis).
IV.ACTIVITIES
Thesewereexclusively concerned withinspection innon-member countries
(seeAnnex1).Giventhestaffcurrently available,therearenoplansfor
inspecgions withintheCommunity (poultrymeat ,meatproducts );anysuch
extension ofactivities wouldfurtherdelaytheimplementation ofthethird
countryDirective,whichshouldbeavoidedifatallpossible .
../.

-3-
V.ANALYSIS
1.Onthegénérallevel
Fromthebeginning ofitsinspection activities ,theCommission was
confronted withconsiderable differences between oneMemberStateand
another.Thethird-country Directive wasadoptedin1972butin1980,when
theinspections began,itbecameevidentthattherulesapplied byone
MemberStatetotradewithagivennon-member countrycoulddiffergreatly
fromthoseappliedbyanother MemberState(wuiteapartfromthederoga­
tionsforwhichtherewasformalprovision intheCommunity legislation ).
Asaresult,thereisnouniformapplication ofCommunity rulesinthe
various non-member countries andtheproblemfacingtheCommission has
been(andstillis)toachieveequalcompliance withtheCommunity
requirements inallnon-member countries .
<
Thus,somedegreeofflexibility willbenecessary inthegradualesta-'
blishment oftheCommunity system;moreimportantstill,theprogress
ofamending thethirdcountryDirective willhavetobespeeded upifany
genuinely satisfactory solutionistobefoundtosomeoftheproblems
facingtheCommission .
TheCommunity mustalsorespectundertakings givenatinternational level
(GATT),thatis,refrainfromanydiscriminatory orexcessive measures
andfulfiltheobligation toprovideinformation andholdconsultations
beforeadopting anynewdecision .
Sucharetheconsiderations whichhaveinfluenced thedecisions takenby
theCommission sofar;anyfutureactionmustbebasedonthesesame .
considerations .
2.Atpratical level
TheCommission hasbeenfacedwithanumberofdifficulties ,thegreatest
ofwhichhavebeenthefollowing :
a)Theestablishment andimplementation ofaninspection programme .
Whensuchaprogramme isdrawnup,priority mustbegiventothe"cove­
rage"ofthosenon-member countries withwhichtheCommunity doesa
substantial volumeoftrade,accountbeingtakenoftheMemberStates'in­
terestincertainnonrmember countries andthewillingness ofnon-member
countries themselves towelcome amissionfromtheCommunity .

Theimplementation oftheprogramme dependsalmostentirely onthe
non-member countries,whichsometimes requestthatinspections should
bepostponed orthatthearrangements shouldbealteredinsomeres­
pects.Theserequests makeitdifficult tokeeptotheprogramme .
b)Practical organization ofinspections .
Itisarelatively simplemattertoplanamissionforoneortwo
(1)
experts.Itismuchmoredifficult toplanforapartyof12orso.
Theroutetobefollowed byeachoftheteamsbelonging toagivenmis­
sionhastobeplanned sothateachsetsoffandarrivesatthefinal
destination atthesametimeastheothers,ensuring,asfaraspossible,
thatalltheteamsarepresentatthepreliminary andfinalmeetings
whicharealwaysinsisted onbythenon-member countries .Theseroutes,
whichcannotbeworkedoutwithouttheassistance ofthecompetent autho­
ritiesinthenon-member countryconcerned,mustbeknownattheearliest
possible datebeforethemissionleavesbecauseallbookings (e.g.tra­
velreservations )havetobemadefromBrussels .Theroutetobetaken
alsodetermines theadvances tobegrantedtotheexperts bytheCom­
mission andtheMemberStatesandtheyhavetobecalculated asaccurately
aspossible .
Experience hasshownthattheserequirements arenotalwaysfullymet
andsometimes missions arriving innon-member countries havebeen
facedwithunexpected circumstances .
c)Thecomposition ofthemissions .
Inaccordance withitsDecision 80/15/EECof21December 1979,theCom­
missionhasconsistently endeavoured toinvolveexpertsfromthe
MemberStatesintheinspection operations ,whereverpossible ;
(1)ThelastmissiontoSouthAmericacomprised 16experts/inspectors .

-5-
thus,forthepurposes ofeachmeasure,accounthastobetakenof:
-reasonably balancedrepresentation oftheMemberStates;
-mutualcomprehension ofthelanguages tobespoken;
-thebusyschedules ofthenational experts,whosometimes finditdiffi­
culttotakepartinlongmissions atthearranged times;
-thebudgetary constraints :inthe1981budget,120.000 ECUwereset
asidefortheexpenses ofnational experts,butthisallocation was
exceeded (appropriations hadtobetransferred fromelsewhere ).For
1982,thebudgetallocation hasbeenreducedto100.000 ECU,although
theinspection programme isonalargerscalethanin1981.
c)Follow-up ofmissions .
Clearly,thereshouldbenodelayinthefollow-up ofmissions .Under
theexisting procedures ,thismeans:
-theinspectors drawuptheirgeneral andspecific reports (thespecific
reportshouldnotbeconfused,wherepublichealthisconcerned,with
thechecklistforeachslaughterhouse ,cuttingplantorcoldstore),
payingdueattention tothehomogeneity ofthesereports;
-adraftCommission decisionisprepared ;
-thereports anddraftdecision aretranslated ;
-allthesedocuments areforwzrded totheMemberStatesandameeting
isorganized forthoseMemberStateswhichwishtodiscussmattersbe­
forethemeetingoftheStanding Veterinary Committee ;
-thedocuments areforwarded tothenon-member countries concerned for
theircomments (obligation under6ATT);
-talksareheldwithrepresentatives ofthenon-member countries concer­
ned(themorerestrictive theyconsiderthedraftdecisiontobe,the
moreobjections theywillmake);
-theStandingVeterinary Committee meetsandtakesavote; ,
-thewrittenprocedure isfollowed ;
-notification isgivenoftheCommission decision .
Inanorganization suchastheCommunity,someofthesetasksrequirethe
participation oftheinspectors ,particularly whendiscussions arebeing
heldwiththeMemberStates.Thisisafactorwhichmustalsobetaken
intoaccount whentheinspection programme isbeingdrawnup.
Someoftheconstraints mentioned abovecouldbeeased:
-ifthereportsdrawnupaftereachinspection weremadebriefer;inpar­
•ticulor,routinereportscouldbeshortened .
•••9•mm

-6-
-ifdata-processing mediawereusedforthestorage,treatment andreproduction
ofthedatacollectedinthecourseofinspections .
-iftheconditions governingtheuseofnationalexpertswerereviewed.Such
expertscouldbeappointedfromalistdrawnupannuallyfortheCommission by
eachMemberStateandgivingthenames,qualifications ,addresses andtelephone
numbersoftheexpertseligibleforinspection missionsrelatingtoanimalor
publichealth.
Whereslaughterhouse inspections areconcerned,theroleofsuchexpertscould
beorientedtowardsthecoordination ofthevariousteams,incollaboration
withaCommissionrepresentative ,inordertoensurehomogeneityofassessment^.
-IfsomeCommission inspectors wereseconded,particularly toSouthAmerica,
Australia andNewZealand,sothatthesecountries,whichexportlargequantities
totheCommunity andmusttherefore comeinforspecialattention,havethe
benefitofpermanent Communitysupervision ;thisisnotonlyintheinterest
oftheCommunity,whichmustdoitsutmosttoensureitsstandardsareupheld,
butalsointheinterestofthenon-member countries concerned becausethein­
spectionstheyoftenthemselves requestcouldthenbeeffectedextremelypromptly.
Thesecondedinspectors wouldberesponsible forallinspectionvisitsinthe
territoryintheircharge,withtheassistance,whereverpossible,ofMember
States 1experts.
VI.GENERAL ASSESSMENT
1.ByMay1982,afterabouttwoyearsofactivity.CommissionStaff,assistedby
expertsfromtheMemberStateshadvisitedmorethantwentycountries and
carriedoutmorethanathousandinspections inconnectionwithpublichealth.
Thisisnotsufficient .Inthenon-member countries :
-theaveragenumberofinspections carriedoutbyeachCommissioninspector
islowerthanexpected;
-inabsoluteterms,thenumberofinspections carriedoutisnotsufficient
fortheCommunity'sobligations toberegardedasfulfilled;afterthree
yearsofactivityitwouldhavebeennormaltoexpectinspection workto
havespreadthroughoutthenon-member „countriesappearingonthelistadopted
bytheCouncilon21December1976(4Scountries);
1)Ifthisapproachisapproved,theCommmissionDecision80/15willprobably
havetobeamendedaccordingly .

-7-
thisobjective willnotbeattained becausesofaronly24countries have
beeninspected .
Furthermore ,itishighlyunlikely,judgingfrompresentprogress,thatinspec­
tionswillincludeintra-Community tradeinredmeatby1983.
Thereareseveral reasonsforthis:
-therearetoofewinspectors ;
-budgetrestrictions (missionexpenses )preventtheimplementation ofa
sufficiently ambitious inspection programme ;
-thelackofback-up fromotherCommission departments obligestheinspectors
toaccomplish tasksnotnormally incumbent onthem.
Theaverageannualnumberofinspections couldbeincreased considerably ifthe
necessary budgetmeasures weretaken.
Buteventhen,itwouldstillbeimpossible ,whentheCommunity systemwas
fullyestablished ,tocarryouttheroutineinspections asdefinedinCommission
Decision 80/15.
Andevenifthiswerepossible,itwouldstillbeinsufficient because no
inspections haveyetbeencarriedoutinsidetheCommunity inthefreshpoultry-
meatormeatproducts sectors (despitethefactthatinspections areobligatory
undertheinstruments adoptedinthesesectors).
Onlyifthenecessary budgetmeasures aretakenwilltheinspectors beable
todevotethemselves exclusively tothetasksforwhichtheywererecruited,
insteadofexpending theirenergies elsewhere .
Similarly,itisonlyonthiscondition thatthe1983programme fornon-member
countries willberespected .
2.Theestablishment oftheinspectorate shouldinvolvetheprovision ofsufficient
staffandfacilities (inspection staff;administrative andtechnical staff)
topermitthepreparation ,execution andfollow-up ofmissions,according to
requirements ,atarateasnearaspossible to100daysofinspection peryear
perinspector (excluding traveltime).

-8-
Thisstructural reinforcement isessentialinordertobeableto:
-carryoutinspections ofanimalhealthandpublichealthinnon-member countries
inaccordance withtheprovisions ofCommission Decision80/15;
-carryoutinspections inthesectorsoffreshmeat(redmeatandwhitemeat),
meat-based productsandanimalprotection insidetheCommunity,overa
sufficiently representative sampleofestablishments (oftheorderof5%
inthecaseofmeatandmeat-based products).
ThetableinAnnexII,drawnupontheseassumptions,showsthestaff,inabsolute
figures,requiredtomeettheseobjectives .Theuseoftemporaryofficialsis
basically agoodsystemandshouldbemaintained .However,itisabsolutely
essentialfortheinspectorate tobeprovidedwithasufficient numberofA
andBgradepermanentofficialsforthefollowingtasks:
-technicalcoordination (animalandpublichealth);
-administrative ,legalandbudgetmanagement .
ThetransferofpowersfromtheMemberStatestotheCommunityinmattersofin­
spection (ontheunderstanding thatMemberStates'expertsremainassociated with
thisactivity)isaccompanied byatransferoffinancialresponsability,although
proportionally thelatterislessburdensome ;thefinancialburdenwillalsobe
proportionally reducedonceCommunitycontrolsareextendedinnon-member countries
tomeat-based products (whichseveralMemberStateshaverequestedrepeatedly )
andfreshpoultrymeat,inwhichsectorstheMemberStatesstillcarryouttheir
ownindependent inspections .IfCommunityinspection workwasextendedalongthese
lines,thestaffingproblemwouldhavetobereviewed.
Obviously,theconclusions presentedinthisreportentailsignificant repercussions
onthebudget,bothintermsoftherecruitment ofstaffandtheconsequentoperating
expenditure .
However,itmustbeborneinmindthattheCommunityexpenditurewillbeaccompanied
bysavingsfortheMemberStates.BeforetheCommunitysystemwasestablishedit
wastheMemberStatesthemselves whichborethecostofinspection workbyorganizing
specialmissionsorbysecondingveterinaryavertstothevariouslocationson
along-termbasis.

-9-
Thecostofsuchinspections carriedoutindependently foreachMemberState
isproportionally higherthanthecostofmissionscarriedoutonthe
Community'sbehalf.
o
o o
InsendingthisreporttotheCouncil,theCommission wishestorecapitulate the
staffingrequestsithasmadeforlegislative purposes.In1981itsubmitted
numerousproposalstotheCouncilandstatedthatitwouldapplyforthe
additional veterinary personnelrequiredunderthebudgetprocedure.
Inparticular,attentionmustbegiventothemeathygienesectorwhichhasbeen
neglectedhithertoandisnowmarkesbyaproliferation ofbarrierstotradeand
severalproblemswhichpublicopinionissensitive (hormones,residuesofanti­
biotics,pesticides,trichinae).
IntheCommission'sCommunication totheCouncilin1978,arequestwasmade
forfivegradeAofficialsforlegislative work;threeweregranted.Thesethree
officials wereassignedmainlytotheanimalhealthsectorbecauseofthedevelop­
mentoflegislation there(brucellosis,swinefever,etc.).Thepublichealth
sectorhasbeenneglected,inparticular withregardtodecisionstobetakenby
theCommission andproposalstobepreparedfortransmission totheCouncilin
accordance withtheCouncil'sprogramme.
Furthermore,theanimalprotection andanimalhusbandrysectorshavehitherobeen
managedalmostentirelybynationalexperts.Thishascreatedseriousproblems
becauseofthedevelopment oflegislative andParliamentary activityinthesectors.
ThetableinAnnexIIIshowsthestaffrequiredtoremedythissituation.
ItisthereforeproposedthattheCouncilshouldapprovethisreport.

VETERINARY INSPECTION :1980REPORTAnnexI
f I
COUNTRY VISITEDNumberof
missionsTotal
duration (1)Numberof
participantsEstablishments
proposed visited ·approved
Argentini 2 59 14 73 60 47
Australi a 1 49 12 457 291-
Austria 2 22 12 41 41-
Chile 1 4 2 2 2-
PeoplesRepublic ofChina 1 23 8- 6-
Isrtaël 1 10 4- - -
Portugal 1 9 4- - -
Switzerland 2 13 6 27 12-
't
Uruguay 2 23 5 20 13 11
TOTAL 13 212 67 620 425 58
(1)=calendar days
(2)=orrevisited

-2- AnnexI
VETERINARY INSPECTION :1981REPORT
COUNTRY VISITEDNumberof
missionsTotal
duration (1)Numberof
participantsestablishments
proposed visited (2)approved
Argentin a 3 27 6 2 5 9
Austral iva 2 20 12 - 40 -
Austria 1 15 5 - 16 -
Brazil 3 49 12 56 56 26
Bulgaria 1 10 5 12 12 -
CostaRioa 2 18 4 4 4 -
Finland 1 5 2 12 9 -
Hungary 2 19 9 18 18 -
Norway 1 8 6 16 15 -
NewZealand 2 39 16 97 125 -
Paraguay 1 5 2 3 3 -
Rumania 2 26 10 24 24 -
Sweden 1 9 8 46 41 -
Switzerland 2 21 4 46 24 -
Czechoslovakia 1 6 2 14 2 -
Uruguay 3 5 6 1 4 5
Yugoslavia1 21 5 28 28 *
TOTAL 29 303 114 379 426 40
Carriedforwardfromprevious year 13 212 67 620 425 58
-GRANDTOTAL 42 515 181 999 851 98
MJcalendar days
(2)orrevisited

DIVISIONVI/B/5
VETERINARY INSPECTIONAnnexII
Existingposts Newactivities Additional postsrequested
A Β C
1A/4
1Β
12A(temporary )responsible solely
forinspection innon-member
countries (Article 5ofCouncil
Directive 72/462).
Allthisstaffhashithertobeen
assignedtoinspections innon
membercountries .-Responsibility ofthedivision
-Coordination andfollow-upof
inspectionvisits
-1responsible foranimalhealth
-1responsible forpublichealth1A/3
1A/5-4
1A/5-4Ό
<D
>
O
L.
α
Ω.
(0
Η-
Η–
<0
Nil -Inspections atfrontierposts 1A/5-4<Λ
m
Nil
Nil
Nil-Intra-Community inspections offresh
poultrymeat (Article5aofDirective
71/118).
-Intra-Community inspections ofmeat-
basedproducts (Article7ofDirec­
tive77/99).
-Intra-Community inspections ofred
meat.
Alltogether about5.500establishments
tobeinspectedbysampling(approx5%).3A/7-4
(temporary )3Βc
«D
Φ
"D
<TJ
c_
O)
C
o
o>c
•t–
Ό
C
φα
φο
NiI -Animalwelfareinspections . 1A/5-4
(temporary)
TOTAL 4A(perma­
nent)
4A(tempo­
rary)3Β

DIVISIONS VI/B/4and VI/F/4
VETERINARY,ANIMALHUSBANDRY ANDANIMALPROTECTION SECTORSAnnex III
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
Existingposts Legislative work Additional postsrequested
Newactivities ABC
1A/3
1A/6(legalexpert)
2Β(archives-notification of
animaldiseases-planning)
Animalhealth
1A/5
3A/4Assistancetoofficialsresponsible for
inspections anderadication schemescon-
cerningthefollowingdiseases:
-brucellosis,tuberculosis /leucosis;
-classicalswinefever;
-Africanswinefever(Sardinia,Spain,
Portugal);
-Foot-andmouthdisease1σ
Φ
Ό
Φ
D
CL·
D
(O
O3
Publichealth
2A/5(1forveterinarymedicinal
productsandresidues)
IA/7(inparticular microbiology
andmeathygiene)Reinforcement ofactivityinthissector
whichhasbeenseverelyneglected :
-implementation ofDirectives already
adoptedbytheCouncil(freshmeat,
poultrymeat,meatproducts);
-preparation ofproposalstotheCoun-
cilinaccordanceinCouncilprogramme
(inparticular residues,hormones).
Assistancetoofficialsresponsible for
thissector1A/7-6
1-»
ω
Q_
Φ
3»
Q>3
Q.
W
w
r+
Q>
H»
H»
Q>
Ό
Ό
O
ScientificVeterinary Committee
NiI Secretarial work 1A/7-6Φ
Û.
Animalprotection
NilInthefieldoflegislation,someofthe
Commissions's dutiesrequireittopurse
workinconnectionwithlivestockproduc­
tion.Harmonization inconnection with
battery-reared poultryisnotyetfinished
andnewmeasuresmustbeundertaken incon-
nectionwithcalvesandpigs,.Withregardtotransport andstepsmustbetakento
implementtextsalreadyadoptedbythe
Counci.l.Withregard,tostunning,furtherworkisalsoneeded Total...1A/5-4
- *
2A//-
1A/5-42Β

-2- AnnexIII
Existing posts Legislation work1 t
Additional postsrequested
Newactivities A Β C
Report 2A/7-6
1A/5-42Β
O)
"D
rt>
NiL IηthefieldofAgricultural Research,thede-
velopment andapplication oftheexisting
scientific research programme inrelationto
theprotection ofanimals .Thecurrent
1981-1984 plansmustbeintegrated withthe
longertermprogramme for1984-1988 .Scientific
datamustbecollected andanalysed inparti­
cularconcerning thedifferent waysofhousing
layinghens,intensive rearingofpigsand
calves,andproblems ofthetransport ofthe
different speciesofanimals. 1A/5-4D
Q_
3
IQ
O3
(O
Τ
QJ
Q_
ÍD
3>
Û)
D
Q.
CD
(/>
Γ+
QJ
»
Total '2A/7-6
2A/5-42Β Û)
T3
"O
-J
O
<
a>
Q_