EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 15.12.2020 COM(2020) 824 final 2020/0360(COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure and repealing Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 {SEC(2020) 431 final} - {SWD(2020) 346 final} - {SWD(2020) 347 final}



EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1.CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL •Reasons for and objectives of the proposal In 2013 a new framework for cross-border energy infrastructure planning was established to modernise and expand Europe’s energy infrastructure to address the fragmented interconnections between Member States, end their isolation from the gas and electricity networks, secure and diversify the Union’s energy supplies, sources and routes and increase the integration of renewable energy sources. The TEN-E Regulation allowed the Union to meet its core energy policy objectives by laying down rules for identifying and the timely development of Projects of Common Interest (PCIs), that will ensure interoperability of trans-European energy networks the functioning of the internal energy market, security of supply in the Union and the integration of renewable forms of energy. It also requires Member States to streamline permit granting procedures for Projects of Common Interest (PCIs) and provides for regulatory assistance, rules and guidance for the cross-border allocation of costs and risk-related incentives and the conditions to access financing from the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF). The President of the Commission has made the European Green Deal the top political priority, with the aim of transforming the Union into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. The Climate Target Plan proposed by the Commission sets Europe on a sustainable path to make this a reality and achieve climate neutrality by 2050. The Green Deal further emphasises that unavoidable climate change will create significant impacts in Europe in spite of the mitigation efforts. Hence, strengthening the efforts on climate proofing, resilience building, disaster prevention and preparedness is crucial. Energy infrastructure is a key enabler for the energy transition as reflected in the Commission’s communication on the European Green Deal and A Clean Planet for all. Infrastructure is a long-lived asset and will therefore need to be consistent with the climate neutrality and other environmental objectives, such as the “do no harm” oath in the Green Deal, to enable rapid and cost-effective decarbonisation of the energy system and more broadly the economy. As such, the TEN-E is a central instrument in the development of an internal energy market and necessary to achieve the European Green Deal objectives. The current climate and energy targets are not sufficiently ambitious to deliver a 2030 climate target of at least 55% greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions, as proposed by the Commission in its efforts to gear towards climate neutrality. The pathway to achieving this reduction in GHG emissions requires a profound transformation of the European energy system, both on the supply and the demand side. The Union will have to significantly scale up renewable electricity generation to reach a share of more than 80% of electricity production from renewable energy sources by 2050, increasingly sourced from offshore locations. Offshore wind capacity in Europe should increase to 300 GW and ocean energy to 40 GW by 2050 in order to meet the climate neutrality, or 25 times the current situation triggering a significant need for coordination in long-term planning and development of offshore and onshore electricity grids in line with the EU strategy for offshore renewable energy. The upscale of offshore renewable energy in Europe by 2050 has an estimated cost of EUR 800 billion of which two thirds for the associated grid infrastructure. To reduce the costs as much as possible, a strong focus on rational grid development is key. The target agreed in the conclusions of the March 2002 Barcelona European Council for Member States to have a level of electricity interconnections equivalent to at least 10 % of their installed production capacity has not yet been achieved. In its conclusions of 23 and 24 October 2014, the European Council endorsed an electricity interconnection target of at least 15 %. The communication of the Commission of 23 November 2017 on strengthening Europe's energy networks assesses progress towards achieving the 10 % interconnection target and suggests ways in which to operationalise the 15 % interconnection target for 2030. An estimated annual average investment of EUR 50.5 billion for electricity transmission and distribution grids is required for achieving the 2030 targets alone. The enhanced role of electricity will be complemented by a relative increase of the role of renewable and low carbon gases in the decarbonised energy mix, as indicated in all scenarios modelling pathways to climate-neutrality. From its current low level in production, transport and consumption, hydrogen is expected to account for approximately 46% - 49% of all renewable and low-carbon gases in 2050. By 2030, total investments needs in hydrogen electrolysers are estimated between EUR 24-42 billion. About EUR 65 billion will be needed for hydrogen transport, distribution and storage 47 . While the objectives of the current Regulation remain largely valid, the current TEN-E framework does not yet fully reflect the expected changes to the energy system that will result from the new political context and in particular the upgraded 2030 targets as well as the 2050 climate neutrality objective under the European Green Deal. In particular, the type and scale of cross-border infrastructure developments brought about by the current TEN-E is insufficient in that it does not cover all infrastructure categories relevant for the energy transition nor does it sufficiently reflect technological developments. The TEN-E in its current form therefore is not fit to support the achievement of the climate neutrality objective. Smart grid solutions, including demand response, have developed considerably over the past years because of the acceleration of the digital transformation of the electricity sector. Smart system integration between the power and gas systems, as well as with other sectors such as transport and industry, offers additional opportunities to decarbonise the gas grid and manage the power system more efficiently, for instance through the production of hydrogen and synthetic gases from renewable energy sources. The current system network planning is too much based on a sectoral approach and hence does not match the need for smart system integration as investment needs are assessed for the gas and electricity sectors in different processes. Also, the expected expansion of the offshore grid needs to be adequately reflected in future grid planning. In addition, the distribution system level will play a more important role in energy infrastructure planning also because a substantial part of renewable energy generation capacity is connected to the low and medium voltage grid. Moreover, the evaluation of the current TEN-E framework has shown delays in the implementation of PCIs that have been identified as necessary to achieve the Union climate and energy policy objectives. In 2020, 27% of electricity PCIs were delayed by on average 17 months against their initially planned commissioning date. For this, the revised TEN-E will particularly aim at: ·Enabling the identification of the cross-border projects and investments across the Union and with its neighbouring countries that are necessary for the energy transition and achievement of the climate targets ·Improving infrastructure planning for energy system integration and offshore grids ·Shortening permitting procedures for PCIs to avoid delays in projects that facilitate the energy transition ·Ensuring the appropriate use of cost sharing tools and regulatory incentives This initiative assessed and identified a set of measures to simplify and improve the efficiency of the TEN-E Regulation and reduce compliance and regulatory costs where possible. The initiative will allow for i) streamlining of reporting and monitoring obligations, ii) opting out of pre-consultation requirements if already covered by the national rules under the same or higher standards as in the TEN-E Regulation and iii) simplification for the inclusion of PCIs in the TYNDP. The simplification measures will generate direct benefits through reduced recurrent direct costs related to administrative burden as a result of reduced monitoring and reporting obligations. These direct benefits are mainly private benefits for certain stakeholders such as project promoters. •Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area

The evaluation of the TEN-E Regulation the Commission carried out to assess its performance to date concluded that the current framework has not been able to demonstrate sufficient flexibility to adapt to changing Union policy objectives over time. This is particularly relevant in the light of the developments in the Union energy and climate policy – particularly the increased emphasis and ambition placed on decarbonisation objectives. The Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal require a significant transformation of the current energy infrastructures to enable a fully integrated carbon-neutral energy system by 2050. While the initial objectives of the TEN-E Regulation -security of supply, market integration, competition and sustainability- are still relevant, the revised TEN-E Regulation introduces changes that ensure consistency with the decarbonisation targets and alignment with the climate-neutrality objective and the “do no significant harm” principle as defined by the Taxonomy Regulation. The overall principles of the revised TEN-E Regulation respond to the need of consistency with various targets and objectives set out in the Clean Energy Package, notably the Electricity Market Directive and Regulation, the Governance Regulation and the Renewable Energy Directive, notably by enabling a large scale deployment and integration of renewable energy sources and supporting an increase in the role of distribution system operators. The Green Deal, and the relevant emission reduction objectives, put the transport sector on a more dynamic decarbonisation pathway than earlier targets. Thus, oil demand is expected to drastically reduce and all unabated oil consumption is expected to be phased out. Therefore, in line with the Green Deal objectives oil supply infrastructure are not included in this Regulation. Although the evaluation did not indicate any direct incoherence between the current TEN-E Regulation and the specific measures contained within the Energy Efficiency Directive, revised provisions reinforce the energy efficiency first principle in the future cross-sectoral infrastructure planning. The Connecting Europe Facility is complementary to the TEN-E Regulation by addressing the financing gap for PCIs with a high socioeconomic and societal value but which lack commercial viability. The eligibility for financial assistance under CEF is linked to the scope of the infrastructure categories covered under the revised TEN-E considering that enjoying the PCI status under TEN-E is a precondition for financing from CEF for cross-border infrastructure projects. •Consistency with other Union policies By strengthening the existing sustainability assessment of PCIs in the revised TEN-E, the Commission also aims to enhance the coherence of the initiative with the relevant aspects of the Union taxonomy for sustainable investments framework. The Taxonomy Regulation establishes the framework for defining criteria that determine whether an economic activity qualifies as environmentally sustainable, thus imposing disclosure obligations for financial and non-financial undertakings of the private sector gearing capital towards (more) sustainable economic activities defined along the consideration of six environmental objectives. Projects of common interest will follow the ‘do no significant harm’ principle as expressed in the Green Deal and in line with the Article 17 of the Taxonomy Regulation. To limit the impact on the environment, infrastructure planning and the infrastructure gaps identification will follow the energy efficiency first principle and consider with priority all relevant non-infrastructure related solutions to address the identified gaps based on an extensive stakeholder process. In addition, during project implementation, project promoters should report on the compliance with environmental legislation to ensure that projects do no significant harm to the environment. This reporting is an important element of the monitoring process and for applications for subsequent Union lists. Moreover, the Regulation introduces a requirement for projects of common interest to integrate climate adaptation measures. Article 171(3) TFEU provides for the possibility that the Union may decide to cooperate with third countries to promote projects of mutual interest (PMI) and to ensure the interoperability of networks in the Union’s neighbourhood. Such cooperation can help reduce GHG emissions in the Union and in third countries, thus contributing to achieving the Green Deal objectives. The inclusion of PMIs in the revised TEN-E Regulation would take account of the increasing role of interconnections with third countries and allow extending the scope of benefits accruing from the implementation of the Union’s regulatory framework beyond its borders. Due account will be taken of the Communication from the Commission on An Economic and Investment Plan for the Western Balkans. The revised TEN-E Regulation aims to address some of the persistent problems such as delays in project implementation and access to financing for cross-border infrastructure projects reinforced by the sanitary crisis showing consistency with aims of the Recovery and Resilience Facility. Depending on Member States’ objectives, financing cross-border smart and sustainable energy interconnections will only be done to a small extent under the RRF. Specific support measures which Member States could chose to grant to PCIs could qualify as State aid. Such measures would require a specific assessment under State aid rules. The PCI status is relevant under State aid rules, both under the 2014 General Block Exemption Regulation and the 2014-2020 Energy and Environmental Aid Guidelines. It is important to recall that national measures taken to support PCIs beyond the cross-border cross allocation and the investment incentives referred to in the TEN-E Regulation could amount to State aid and may be subject to an assessment under State aid rules. This is particularly relevant for electrolysers and storage projects, which may have a more direct impact on energy generation markets. 2.LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY •Legal basis Article 170 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union foresees that the Union shall contribute to the establishment and development of trans-European networks, including in the area of energy infrastructure. The Union will need to promote interconnection of national networks. The TEN-E Regulation is based on Article 172 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union which provides for the legal base to adopt guidelines covering the objectives, priorities and broad lines of measures envisaged in the sphere of trans-European networks as set out in Article 171. The guidelines are to identify projects of common interest that are necessary for achieving the policy goals of the TEN-E. The guidelines also set the conditions under which the Union may financially support the PCIs. •Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence) Energy transmission infrastructure (including an interconnected offshore grid and smart grid infrastructure) has a European added value due to its cross-border impacts and is essential to achieve a climate neutral energy system. The TEN-E Regulation has provided value and has contributed to achieving results regarding the Union energy market integration, competition and security of supply. A framework for regional cooperation across Member States is necessary to develop cross-border energy infrastructure. Individual Member State regulations and actions are insufficient to deliver these infrastructure projects as a whole. The internal energy market require cross-border infrastructure, the development of which requires cooperation of two or more Member States, all with their own regulatory framework. The TEN-E Regulation has provided additional value compared to what could have been achieved at national or regional level alone. The implementation of over 40 key energy infrastructure projects since its entry into force helped most Member States reach the 10% interconnection target for 2020 and achieve a well-interconnected and shock-resilient gas grid. The Union energy market is more integrated and competitive than it was in 2013 and the Union’s energy security has improved. Access to targeted financing under CEF enabled the implementation of 95 PCIs which have had otherwise difficulties in accessing financing under market rules. The above progress could not have been achieved with Member State action alone. Various stakeholders confirmed the added value of the TEN-E Regulation, pointing to the importance of regional cooperation in implementing cross-border projects, transparency regulatory certainty and access to financing. •Proportionality The initiative complies with the proportionality principle. It falls within the scope for action in the field of the trans-European energy networks, as defined in Article 170 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The policy intervention is proportional to the dimension and nature of the problems defined and the achievement of the set objectives. The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the general objective pursued to facilitate the timely development of sufficient energy infrastructures across the Union and in its neighbourhood to enable delivering on the Union’s energy and climate objectives in line with the European Green Deal, in particular on the 2030/50 targets including the climate-neutrality objective, compliance with the “do no significant harm” principle, as well as market integration competitiveness, and security of supply.

Building on the results of the evaluation, the Commission assessed several policy options belonging to four impact areas of the current TEN-E framework, such as scope, governance/infrastructure planning, permitting and public participation, and regulatory treatment. The assessment and the comparison of the options (see in particular sections 7 and 8 of the accompanying Impact Assessment) shows that no single option is sufficient to meet the identified objectives. The identification of package of policy options best suited to achieve the specific objectives is based on an assessment that includes the proportionality principle. The package aims to “future proof” the TEN-E Regulation. The options on the future scope of the Regulation cover all technologies necessary for the energy transition and climate targets. The definitions are at the same time specific and sufficiently broad to accommodate technological developments to the extent possible. The PCI selection framework and the new approach to cross-sectoral infrastructure planning sets the key elements in terms of objectives and criteria. The future framework will maintain the role of the regional groups in the selection process to further specify and adjust these elements against new policy priorities and technological developments also considering the regional context. •Choice of the instrument Building on the overall positive evaluation of the current Regulation, the instrument chosen is a Regulation, an effective instrument which has direct application and is binding in its entirety, ensuring uniform implementation and legal certainty.



3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS •Ex-post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation In March 2019, as part of the partial political agreement between the European Parliament and the Council on the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2021-2027, the co-legislators agreed on the need to evaluate the effectiveness and policy coherence of the Regulation 347/2013 on the guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure (TEN-E Regulation) by 31 December 2020. In December 2019 the Communication of the Commission on the European Green Deal explicitly referred to the need for a review of the TEN-E Regulation to ensure consistency with climate neutrality objectives. In view of the timeline for the evaluation and revision of the TEN-E Regulation, the Commission opted for a “back-to-back evaluation and impact assessment”. The evaluation of the TEN-E Regulation was carried out between January 2019 and September 2020. The evaluation assessed the extent to which the TEN-E Regulation has performed so far in achieving its stated objectives, identifying factors that helped or hindered their achievement. Specifically, it assessed the effectiveness of the Regulation compared to a baseline (i.e. the situation without the Regulation), to appraise whether or not it has had a significant impact and added value. In short, the evaluation looked at: • How and why the current TEN-E Regulation has worked well or not so well, and which factors have helped or hampered the achievement of its objectives; • The impact of the Regulation, particularly in terms of progress towards achieving its objectives. The “back to back” approach ensured that formative elements are drawn from the outcomes of the evaluation to conclude on the extent to which the Regulation will remain fit-for-purpose and relevant in the future in view of the adopted or planned policy initiatives which will accelerate the mid- and long-term decarbonisation. The forward-looking elements looked into how to ensure that enabling energy infrastructure is in place to match the increased decarbonisation and renewable energy deployment ambitions and indicate areas of intervention. In line with the scope and applicability of the TEN-E Regulation, the evaluation covered all Member States. In accordance with the Better Regulation guidelines, five criteria were applied to evaluate the performance of the TEN-E Regulation: effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence, and Union added value. The evaluation has shown that since 2013, energy interconnections have increased across the Union as a result of the implementation of the TEN-E Regulation and PCIs in all regions. Increased interconnection effectively improved the integration of Member States’ networks, which in turned made the Union energy market more integrated and competitive than it was before the implementation of the TEN-E Regulation. Wholesale prices for electricity converged in almost all Member States. Gas prices also converged. An increase in security of gas supply has been achieved substantially since 2013 through new interconnections and LNG terminals. PCIs have helped fulfilling the current objectives of the TEN-E Regulation as it was conceived in 2013. However, infrastructure categories in the current TEN-E Regulation do not reflect the new climate ambitions and the climate neutrality objective nor the latest technological developments. This progress should be taken into account in the infrastructure categories covered by the Regulation, the PCI selection criteria as well as the priority corridors and thematic areas. The PCI identification and selection process within the Regional Groups has been found effective in improving cooperation and enabling decisions on cross-border projects on the basis of a regional and European approach. The TYNDP process has proven effective as a first step for the identification of PCIs. However, while the ENTSOs and TSOs have an important role to play in the process, there is a need for more inclusiveness and scrutiny of the main inputs and assumptions to enhance trust in the process. The cross-border cost allocation mechanism is an important enabler for project implementation. However, in many cases the cross-border cost allocation did not result reducing the financing gap of the project, as intended. While permitting procedures have been shortened, long permitting procedures persist in some cases. However, the underlying reasons are mainly related to national implementation and outside the scope of the TEN-E Regulation. CEF financial assistance granted to 95 projects were an effective enabler of their implementation. Grants for studies helped projects to reduce risks in the early stages of development while grants for works supported projects addressing key bottlenecks that market-based finance could not sufficiently address. The evaluation found that the benefits of the Regulation outweigh the costs proving its efficiency. TEN-E Regulation brought socio-economic benefits through an increase in security of supply and more integrated and competitive energy markets. The Regulation also contributed to improved information availability, coordination and transparency.

The initial objectives of the TEN-E Regulation -security of supply, market integration, competition and sustainability- remain relevant. However, the increased climate ambitions under the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal call for a rebalancing of the objectives in order to fulfil the decarbonisation targets and contribute to climate-neutrality. The evaluation showed limited evidence as to concerns around the internal coherence of the TEN-E Regulation, other than potential mechanistic changes and a lack of flexibility in adapting to rapidly evolving policy areas. The TEN-E Regulation delivered results which could have not otherwise been achieved by action at Member State level, proving Union added value. •Stakeholder consultations In general, stakeholders largely believe that the PCI process enables the selection of the most relevant PCIs for the fulfilment of the TEN-E objectives by means of regional cooperation within the Regional Groups. Whilst in principle the selection criteria are considered appropriate, stakeholders called for consistency with climate targets through a thorough sustainability check. Equally, the criteria are considered too restrictive for smart grids projects by some NGOs and stakeholders from the sector. Stakeholders expressed the view that the TEN-E Regulation is not fully addressing key issues such as the deeper integration of renewable energy, improving energy efficiency and climate change mitigation. The input pointed towards some inconsistencies between the TEN-E Regulation and other policies or initiatives at Union level such as the European Green Deal / Long Term Strategy for Decarbonisation. In response to these challenges, the following infrastructure categories were seen as relevant for further inclusion in the TEN-E framework: hydrogen infrastructures and smart gas distribution grids, power-to-gas, energy network to support electric charging / hydrogen refuelling infrastructures and energy network in hybrid offshore wind projects. However, dedicated hydrogen infrastructure, smart gas grids and power-to-gas technologies received mixed support, notably from NGOs. Rather low support from stakeholders, notably civil society, NGOs and electricity industry associations, has been indicated towards CO2 networks and in particular CO2 storage. However, further analysis of the input received on the inclusion of CO2 networks as an infrastructure category, indicated that there was limited evidence to remove CO2 networks from the TEN-E Regulation. As regards governance and role of different actors, stakeholders called for weakening the role of the ENTSOs, whilst strengthening the role of DSOs and other stakeholders, such as NGOs. Whilst permit granting procedures have shortened since the entry into force of the TEN-E Regulation, their effectiveness strongly depends on national implementation as indicated by various stakeholders. While continuously complex national procedures are one cause for this, environmental issues of PCIs and public opposition causing lengthy court cases against the projects are other reasons for extended permitting times. The public consultation requirements under TEN-E seem to have increased awareness of PCI projects, improved public participation and trust in the process. However, provisions seem to have a limited impact on increasing public acceptance mostly due to the perceived lack of (up to date) information on the infrastructure needs and the lack of feedback on the design of the projects. The approach introduced in the TEN-E to share costs between Member States in order to enable projects with benefits across borders, the cross-border cost allocation (CBCA) mechanism, was largely appraised as having addressed the pre-existing asymmetries between costs and benefits. CBCAs prove to be effective in some cases, although the valuation of the mechanism and the complexity of obtaining data, the additional time until an investment decision can be made and the lack of unambiguous results to base the decision on are factors reducing the satisfaction of stakeholders with the process. There is widespread agreement among stakeholders that the TEN-E Regulation has Union added value and its results could not have been achieved individually by Member States. An equal majority indicated that the issues addressed by the TEN-E Regulation continue to require action at Union level. Moreover, the majority of respondents believe that the benefits of the TEN-E Regulation outweigh its costs. •Collection and use of expertise The proposal and its underpinning impact assessment draws on evidence from the evaluation of the Regulation 347/2013 on guidelines for the trans-European energy networks, from the stakeholder input to the extensive consultations carried out in this respect, as well as literature review, PCI portfolio analysis and modelling. Literature review included the results of a series of topical studies on key elements of the TEN-E Regulation, the outcomes of a mid-term evaluation of the TEN-E Regulation, as well as evaluations and assessments carried out in the framework of other relevant Commission initiatives. Formal conclusions adopted in the framework of stakeholder fora on energy infrastructure and related policy were also considered in the analysis. ACER’s annual consolidated monitoring reports on the progress of electricity and gas PCIs, incremental capacity projects and virtual interconnection points as well other updates on the cross-border cost allocation decisions, project-specific risk-based incentives were equally considered. •Impact assessment

Following the Better Regulation guidelines the Commission carried out an Impact Assessment of several policy options. This work was supported by structured consultation within the Commission via an Inter-Service Steering Group. The impact assessment was presented to and discussed with the Regulatory Scrutiny Board (RSB). Recommendations made by the RSB in its first (negative) opinion of 25 September 2020 were notably addressed by: (i) further clarifying the background and key elements of the current TEN-E Regulation, ii) highlighting key conclusions of the evaluation on the successes and shortcomings of the current TEN-E Regulation and linking them systematically to the problem definition, iii) further clarifying the problem definition to better explain how the TEN-E framework fits into the new policy context of the Green Deal and how the objectives and options relate to the problems and underlying drivers, iv) better explaining why the package of preferred options is considered best suited to address the identified problems (and highlighting possible alternatives), and v) specifying success indicators. The second opinion from the Regulatory Scrutiny Board on 1 December was positive opinion with reservations which were notably addressed by: (i) further clarifying the different scope and purpose of the TEN-E Regulation and the Taxonomy Regulation, ii) explaining that the combined impacts of the proposed changes will align the PCI selection with EU policy objectives including the Green Deal, iii) further clarifying why the package of preferred options is considered “future proof”, and iv) better explaining that national implementation and enforcement is a key issue to address permitting delays and how the preferred option can contribute to timely implementation of PCIs. Throughout the impact assessment work, a range of measures were considered across all areas to address the identified problems and problem drivers in order to reach the objectives of the initiative. Following an assessment of their effectiveness, efficiency, coherence and proportionality, a package of preferred options has been found best suited to contribute to the set objectives. The package of preferred options includes the following main provisions: ·Update of eligibility criteria for smart electricity grids ·Exclude natural gas infrastructure but include hydrogen, P2G and smart gas grids ·Inclusion of projects of mutual interest (PMIs) ·Integrated offshore development plans ·Strengthened governance and sustainability ·Accelerating the project implementation ·One-stop shop per sea basin for offshore renewable projects ·Inclusion full investment costs Concerning the future scope of TEN-E, a key question is whether to keep natural gas infrastructure as eligible infrastructure category or not. Based on the analysis in sections 6 and 7 of the impact assessment, the exclusion of methane gas infrastructure appears as the most effective and coherent approach. At the same time, the inclusion of hydrogen infrastructure in the scope of the TEN-E framework appeared justified given its expected increasing role for the decarbonisation of certain sectors and potential for cross-border exchanges. Taken together, these changes would ensure that the future TEN-E would include all those infrastructure categories that are needed to deliver on the Union’s energy and climate objectives in line with the European Green Deal, in particular on the 2030/50 targets. As regards the future approach to infrastructure planning, a radical change to infrastructure planning seems unjustified in view of the limited additional benefits and the significant increase in transaction costs which reduce efficiency and may make the instrument less effective compared to strengthening the current approach. However, given the specificities both in terms of the current situation and expected contribution to the long-term climate and energy objectives, a more radical change appears justified for offshore grids. The options pertaining to “offshore grids” and “cross-sectoral infrastructure planning” improve the governance and the infrastructure planning framework to enable the identification of projects necessary for the energy transition and climate targets in line with the offshore renewable potential of each sea basin, environmental protection and other uses of the sea. There are two main improvements: first, the introduction of an integrated network development plan for offshore infrastructure on the basis of Member States’ joint commitments to the amount of the offshore renewable deployment for each sea basin (top down approach for offshore planning); second, adjustments to the roles of the key actors involved in the development of the TYNDP with strengthened oversight from the Commission and ACER on the ENTSOs. Policy options concerning “permitting” and “regulatory treatment” will complement these improvements to facilitate the timely development of the identified PCIs: a) the introduction of a one stop shop for offshore infrastructure per sea basin, b) the access to urgent court procedures, where available, and c) the inclusion of full investment costs in the cross-border cost allocation. Apart from the changes that are specific to offshore grids, the changes will apply to the scope of the revised TEN-E Regulation and all eligible infrastructure categories. Finally, the above benefits will be extended to projects connecting the Union with third countries (PMIs) given their expected increasing role in achieving the climate objectives. In addition, several technical options (see Annex 9 of the impact assessment) are part of the policy package: accelerating the permitting process, increasing the transparency of PCIs, possibility for smart grids projects to obtain a CBCA, clarifying CBCA provisions, and updating investment incentives. Moreover, oil pipelines and electricity highways will be removed as infrastructure categories and thematic areas. The assessment of the impacts relies to a large extent on a qualitative approach. It was not possible to quantify the impacts for all options due to the lack of project specific data in particular for new infrastructure categories. Moreover, the proposed changes are mainly gradual improvements to the current framework, which has been deemed to work relatively well. Adapting the scope of the instrument by ensuring the consistency of infrastructure categories with the climate-neutrality objective will lower greenhouse gas emissions supported by optimal and efficient integrated infrastructure planning which also minimizes potential environmental impacts. An accelerated permitting process will also allow for a faster implementation of key projects therefore bringing forward the environmental and socio-economic benefits. The impact assessment identified the following key target groups who would be affected by this initiative: European citizens and consumers, non-governmental organisations, European Union Regulators, National Regulatory Authorities, National Competent Authorities and their local and regional representatives, European Network of Transmission System Operators (ENTSO-E and ENTSO-G), DSO branch organisations, project promoters, including Transmission System Operators, energy producers / industry, academics and thematic experts. The direct benefits of the package of preferred policy options are mainly related to greenhouse gas emission savings and efficiency improvements at large scale through a more coordinated approach to infrastructure planning at European level and streamlined permitting for offshore developments. These direct benefits encompass both social benefits, e.g. society at large benefits from reduced greenhouse gas emissions and the achievement of the climate neutrality objective, and private benefits, e.g. reduced administrative costs related to shorter permitting procedures. The simplification measures will generate direct benefits through reduced existing recurrent direct costs related to administrative burden as a result of reduced monitoring and reporting obligations. These direct benefits are mainly private benefits for certain stakeholders such as project promoters. Indirect benefits include sectoral benefits by stimulating market demand for certain innovative technologies and in turn contributing to potentially higher employment rates.

The assessment of the preferred options showed positive impacts in social welfare and economic terms for different categories of stakeholders. However, such impact for the package of preferred policy options could not be fully quantified or monetised as this would have required information regarding the deployment rate for future PCIs or market upscale for new or emerging infrastructure categories, which is not available and cannot be estimated with sufficient degree of robustness. It is important to underline that one general selection criterion for each project of common interest is that its potential overall benefits outweigh its costs, including in the longer term. The TEN-E Regulation does not introduce any regulatory charges, such as fees, levies, taxes, etc. The package of preferred policy options results in direct costs in terms of compliance costs and administrative burden for businesses (mainly project promoters) and administrations (national competent authorities, national regulatory authorities, the Commission, and ACER) in order to comply with substantive obligations or requirements contained therein. The application of the package of preferred options results in indirect costs for citizens/consumers, businesses and administrations through an increase in network tariffs to finance investments in the regulatory asset base (RAB). However, CEF financial assistance can alleviate the impact on network tariffs in case a PCI shows significant externalities in terms of security of supply, solidarity, or innovation. It was not possible to estimate these costs for all actions at this stage but they are considered as non-significant. The additional costs would be marginal compared to the current costs. Additional enforcement costs at national and Union level will depend on the implementation. •Regulatory fitness and simplification The revised TEN-E Regulation will aim at reducing reporting obligations by finding synergies between the competent authorities and the project promoters’ reporting. To safeguard the transparency and access of the Regional Groups to the most updated project implementation status whilst achieving recurrent cost savings, the annual report of the competent authorities could be integrated into the report of the project promoters. Second, ACER monitoring obligations will be reduced to biennial reporting in time for the assessment of the new PCI candidates generating efficiency gains of approximately 20% of ACER’s workload on reporting, equivalent to annual savings of EUR 60 000 (or 0.4 FTE per year). Third, the revised TEN-E Regulation will allow the pre-consultation ahead of the launch of permitting procedure for PCIs to become optional, if already covered by national rules under the same or higher standards as in the TEN-E Regulation. Public participation and engagement with local communities and stakeholders affected by the construction of a PCI will be safeguarded whilst avoiding obligations that add to existing national procedures. Fourth and last, the new provisions recommend a simplified inclusion of existing PCIs in the Ten-Year Network Development Plans (TYNDPs), where projects on the Union list of PCIs having already provided necessary administrative and technical data to the TYNDP process can benefit from automatic inclusion in the subsequent plans provided the data remained unchanged. No direct impacts in terms of compliance or administrative costs for SMEs are identified. SMEs could benefit from increased competitiveness in those technology areas that are included or strengthened in the future TEN-E framework (e.g. offshore renewable energy industry, digital services, or hydrogen). The initiative is coherent with the Digital Single Market and coherent with the Union strategy for data. •Fundamental rights The initiative is not expected to have an impact on fundamental rights. 4.BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS The budgetary impact associated to the proposal concern the resources of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER). ACER will take on additional responsibilities in the oversight of the Ten-Year Network Development Plan. This requires a limited number of additional resources (1 additional FTE, see Legislative Financial Statement). 5.OTHER ELEMENTS •Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements Building on the existing processes for monitoring data from regular reports prepared by project promoters and national regulators, several indicators have been developed to measure the achievement of each of the specific objective of the revised TEN-E Regulation. The actual impacts of the legislation will be monitored and evaluated against a set of indicators tailored to the specific policy objectives to be achieved with the legislation. In addition, four operational objectives related to the package of policy options will be measured against a set of indicators. All data will be monitored on the basis of regular reports from project promoters and national regulators. A review of the effectiveness of the new legislation should take place in 2026, when the second PCI selection process under the new framework should have been completed. •Explanatory documents (for directives) The Regulation will be directly and uniformly implemented in the Member States, and hence not requiring an Explanatory Document.

•Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal Chapter I of the revised Regulation outlines the general provisions, notably the subject matter and scope of the new infrastructure categories which have been revised to reflect the general objective to facilitate the timely development of adequate energy infrastructures across the Union and in its neighbourhood to enable delivering on the Union’s energy and climate objectives in line with the European Green Deal, in particular on the 2030/50 targets including the climate-neutrality objective, as well as market integration, competitiveness, and security of supply at least cost for consumers and businesses. Current Articles 2(7), 4(2)(c), 4(4) and Annexes I, II, IV defining the criteria for smart electricity grids have been updated to reflect technological change and include elements regarding innovation and digital aspects that could be considered among the equipment or installations for smart grids. The broadened scope of the smart electricity grids has been reflected in the adjustment of the selection criteria. Furthermore, the role of project promoters has been further clarified. Smart grid technologies should also help to improve energy network related support for high capacity recharging to support the decarbonisation of the transport sector. Provisions regarding the inclusion of natural gas elements in the scope of the TEN-E, notably Article 4, and Annexes I, II, IV now reflect the significant improvements in the security of supply thanks to the implementation of the TEN-E policy to date. By the early 2020s, when the gas projects of common interest currently under construction will be in operation, Europe should achieve a well-interconnected and shock-resilient gas grid and all Member States will have access to at least three gas sources. Considering that the future natural gas demand is estimated to significantly decrease in line with the Green Deal objectives, natural gas infrastructure no longer needs support through the TEN-E policy. On the other hand, the revised TEN-E is reflecting the changing gas landscape with an increased role for renewable and low carbon gases in Articles 2, 4 and Annexes I, II, IV by creating a new category of infrastructure for smart gas grids. This would support investments at distribution and/or transmission level to integrate green gases (typically biogas and biomethane but also hydrogen) in the network and help manage a resulting more complex system, building on innovative technologies. The candidate projects would consist of a range of investments directed at "smartening" and decarbonising a given gas network. To support the decarbonisation needs of the hard to abate sectors, TEN-E will include dedicated new and repurposed hydrogen networks with cross border relevance (including hydrogen transmission pipelines and related equipment such as compressors, storage facilities, and facilities for liquefied hydrogen) and power-to-gas facilities above a certain threshold with cross-border relevance (i.e. aiming to supply at least two Member States). Hydrogen networks will be appropriately reflected in the Union-wide ten-year network development plans (TYNDPs) prepared by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas. New general selection criteria are added in Article 4(2) to reflect the inclusion of projects of mutual interest in the scope of the Regulation if they are able to demonstrate significant net socio-economic benefits for at least two Union Member States and at least one third country. Such projects would be eligible for inclusion in the Union list upon conditions of approximation of the regulatory framework of the third country with the Union and upon demonstrating a contribution to the Union’s overall energy and climate objectives in terms of security of supply and decarbonisation. For their lack of alignment with the long-term decarbonisation objectives and the Green Deal, cross-border oil pipelines will no longer be included in the Regulation. Chapter II outlines the provisions as regards the process of preparing the Union lists of projects of common interest within the Regional Groups, the criteria for selection and monitoring of project implementation. The criteria for selection of projects now cover a mandatory sustainability criterion for all infrastructure categories with at least one other criterion (market integration, security of supply, competition) at the stage of project selection to ensure coherence with the evolution of the infrastructure needs of the Union and the decarbonisation goals. Additionally, the implementation progress made by the project, together with proof of transparency and reporting obligations will now be considered by the regional group in the PCI selection process. The new provisions under Chapter II and IV aim to improve infrastructure planning for energy system integration. To this end, the revised TEN-E strengthens the governance of the Union-wide ten-year network development plan, which is a basis for the identification of projects of common interest in the categories of electricity and gas. While the ENTSOs and transmission system operators have an important role to play in the process, there is a need for more scrutiny to enhance trust in the process, in particular as regards defining the scenarios for the future, identifying long-term infrastructure gaps and bottlenecks and assessing individual projects. Therefore, due to the need for independent validation, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (‘the Agency’) and the Commission will have an increased role in the process. Provisions under Chapter III aim at shortening permitting procedures for PCIs to avoid delays in projects that facilitate the energy transition. As such, the revised TEN-E institutes the need for competent authorities to coordinate and find synergies with neighbouring countries in developing their manual of procedures, avoid additional requirements or legislative amendments during the permit granting process and show flexibility in applying the permitting stages depending on the infrastructure category so as to accelerate or shorten the overall permitting duration. The revised TEN-E introduces an “offshore one-stop shop” to simplify and expedite the permitting process for offshore grids for renewable energy that shall act as a repository of existing sea basin studies and plans, aiming at facilitating the permitting process of individual projects of common interest and issue the comprehensive decisions for such projects. In order to avoid that several consultations are required at an early stage the pre-consultation should be optional, if it is already covered by national rules under the same or higher standards as in the current TEN-E Regulation. Under the revised TEN-E, Member States would have to ensure that accelerated litigation procedures are applicable to PCIs under national legislations (where existing). The new provisions equally strengthen the transparency obligation on the project promoters, as the owner of the information regarding the implementation of the PCIs to publish and update dedicated webpages in all languages of the Member States crossed or impacted by the PCIs. Moreover, the project promoter is obliged to take into account the opinions expressed in the public consultations and demonstrate how this has been done. The project promoter shall publish on its website a report showing how the opinions expressed in the public consultations were taken into account by showing what amendments were done in the location, trajectory and design of the project or by justifying why such opinions have not been taken into account. The provisions under Chapter V support the need for the development of the grid needed for the significant expected scale-up of electricity generation from offshore grids for renewable energy sources. TEN-E will ensure a coordinated long-term planning and development of offshore and onshore electricity grids thus moving away from project-by-project approach while minimising the environmental and climate impact. In order to ensure the appropriate use of the cost sharing tools and regulatory incentives, chapter VI revises existing provisions to increase the clarity and transparency for cost allocation across borders and accelerate investment in cross-border infrastructure. As such, the TEN-E foresees the obligation of full inclusion of investments costs into tariffs followed by an affordability assessment on consumers. For specific projects likely to incur higher risks such as innovative transmission technologies for electricity allowing for large-scale integration of renewable energy, distributed energy resources or demand response in interconnected networks, and energy technology and digitalisation projects, or projects with high operational expenditure, regulatory frameworks should provide proportional and appropriate incentives for investment. The new provisions under Chapter VII update the eligibility of projects for Union financial assistance for the new infrastructure categories. While projects of mutual interest will be eligible for Union financial assistance, only the investments located on the territory of the Union will be eligible for Union financial assistance from the Connecting Europe Facility in the form of grants for works under specific conditions.



2020/0360 (COD) Proposal for a

REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure and repealing Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 172 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments, Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee, Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions, Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, Whereas: (1)The Commission has set out, in its Communication of 11 December 2019 entitled ‘The European Green Deal’, a new growth strategy that aims to transform the Union into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy, where there are no net emissions of greenhouse gases in 2050 and where economic growth is decoupled from resource use. The Commission’s communication on the Climate Target Plan proposing to increase the greenhouse gas emissions’ reduction level to at least 55% by 2030 - an ambition that was endorsed by the European Council on 11 December 2020 - and its underlying impact assessment confirms that the energy mix of the future will be very different from the one of today and underpins the necessity to review and if necessary to revise the energy legislation. The current energy infrastructure investments are clearly insufficient to transform and build the energy infrastructure of the future. That also means infrastructure needs to be in place to support the European energy transition, including rapid electrification, scaling up of renewable electricity generation, the increased use of renewable and low-carbon gases, energy system integration and a higher uptake of innovative solutions. (2)Following the Commission’s proposals as part of the Clean Energy for All Europeans package, an agreement was reached on a binding Union level target for renewable energy for 2030 of at least 32% of final energy consumption and a headline Union level target for energy efficiency of at least 32,5%. (3)The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change following the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the ‘Paris Agreement’) sets out a long-term goal to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, and stresses the importance of adapting to the adverse impacts of climate change and making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development. On 12 December 2019, the European Council endorsed the objective of achieving a climate-neutral European Union by 2050, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. (4)Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the current TEN-E Regulation, lays down rules for the timely development and interoperability of trans-European energy networks in order to achieve the energy policy objectives of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to ensure the functioning of the internal energy market, security of supply and competitive energy markets in the Union, to promote energy efficiency and energy saving and the development of new and renewable forms of energy, and to promote the interconnection of energy networks. Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 puts in place a framework for Member States and relevant stakeholders to work together in a regional setting to develop better-connected energy networks with the aim to connect regions currently isolated from European energy markets, strengthen existing cross-border interconnections, and help integrate renewable energy. By pursuing those objectives, Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 contributes to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and brings benefits to the entire Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion. (5)The evaluation of Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 has clearly shown that the framework has effectively improved the integration of Member States’ networks, stimulated energy trade and hence contributed to the competitiveness of the Union. Projects of common interest in electricity and gas have strongly contributed to security of supply. For gas, the infrastructure is now well connected and supply resilience has improved substantially since 2013. Regional cooperation in Regional Groups and through cross-border cost allocation is an important enabler for project implementation. However, in many cases the cross-border cost allocation did not result in reducing the financing gap of the project, as intended. While the majority of permitting procedures have been shortened, in some cases the process is still long. The financial assistance from the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) has been an important factor as grants for studies have helped projects to reduce risks in the early stages of development, while grants for works have supported projects addressing key bottlenecks that market finance could not sufficiently address. (6)The TEN-E policy is a central instrument in the development of an internal energy market and necessary to achieve the European Green Deal objectives. To achieve climate neutrality by 2050 and higher levels of greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030, Europe will need a more integrated energy system, relying on higher levels of electrification based on renewable sources and the decarbonisation of the gas sector. The TEN-E policy can ensure that the Union energy infrastructure development supports the required energy transition to climate neutrality in line with the energy efficiency first principle. (7)While the objectives of Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 remain largely valid, the current TEN-E framework does not yet fully reflect the expected changes to the energy system that will result from the new political context and in particular the upgraded 2030 targets and the 2050 climate neutrality objective under the European Green Deal. Besides the new political context and objectives, technological development has been rapid in the past decade. That development should be taken into account in the infrastructure categories covered by this Regulation, the projects of common interest selection criteria as well as the priority corridors and thematic areas. (8)Directives (EU) 2019/944 and 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council provide for an energy internal market. While there has been very significant progress in the completion of the internal energy market, there is still room for improvement by a better utilisation of existing energy infrastructure, the integration of the increasing amounts of renewable energy and system integration. (9)The Union’s energy infrastructure should be upgraded in order to prevent technical failure and to increase its resilience against such failure, natural or man-made disasters, adverse effects of climate change and threats to its security, in particular as regards European critical infrastructures pursuant to Council Directive 2008/114/EC. (10)The Union’s energy infrastructure should be resilient to the unavoidable impacts that climate change is estimated to create in Europe in spite of the mitigation efforts. Hence, strengthening the efforts on climate adaptation, resilience building, disaster prevention and preparedness is crucial.

(11)Security of supply, as one main driver behind Regulation (EU) No 347/2013, has been significantly improved through projects of common interest. Moreover, the Commission’s climate target impact assessment expects the consumption of natural gas to be reduced significantly because its non-abated use is not compatible with carbon-neutrality. On the other hand, the consumption of biogas, renewable and low-carbon hydrogen and synthetic gaseous fuels will increase significantly towards 2050. Therefore, the natural gas infrastructure no longer needs support through the TEN-E policy. The planning of energy infrastructure should reflect this changing gas landscape. (12)The importance of smart electricity grids in achieving the Union’s energy and climate policy objectives has been acknowledged in the communication from the Commission on energy system integration. The criteria for the category should include technological developments regarding innovation and digital aspects. Furthermore, the role of projects promoters should be clarified. Given the expected significant increase in power demand from the transport sector, in particular for electric vehicles along highways and in urban areas, smart grid technologies should also help to improve energy network related support for cross border high capacity recharging to support the decarbonisation of the transport sector. (13)The Commission’s communication on energy system integration underlines the need for integrated energy infrastructure planning across energy carriers, infrastructures, and consumption sectors. Such system integration starts from the point of departure of applying the energy efficiency first principle and taking a holistic approach beyond individual sectors. It also addresses the decarbonisation needs of the hard to abate sectors, such as parts of industry or certain modes of transport, where direct electrification is, currently, technically or economically challenging. Such investments include hydrogen and electrolysers, which are progressing towards commercial large-scale deployment. The Commission’s Hydrogen Strategy gives priority to hydrogen production from renewable electricity, which is the cleanest solution and is most compatible with the EU climate neutrality objective. In a transitional phase however, other forms of low-carbon hydrogen are needed to more rapidly replace existing hydrogen and kick-start an economy of scale. (14)Moreover, the Commission’s Hydrogen Strategy concluded that for the required deployment of hydrogen a large-scale infrastructure network is an important element that only the Union and the single market can offer. There is currently very limited dedicated infrastructure in place to transport and trade hydrogen across borders. Such should consist of a significant extent of assets converted from natural gas, complemented by new assets dedicated to hydrogen. Furthermore, the Hydrogen Strategy sets a strategic goal to increase installed electrolyser capacity to 40 GW by 2030 in order to scale up the production of renewable hydrogen and facilitate the decarbonisation of fossil-fuel dependent sectors, such as industry or transport. Therefore, the TEN-E policy should include new and repurposed hydrogen transmission infrastructure and storage as well as electrolyser facilities. Hydrogen transmission and storage infrastructure should also be included in the Union-wide ten-year network development plan so as to allow a comprehensive and consistent assessment of their costs and benefits for the energy system, including their contribution to sector integration and decarbonisation, with the aim of creating a hydrogen backbone for the Union. (15)Moreover, a new infrastructure category should be created for smart gas grids to support investments which integrate renewable and low carbon gases such as biogas, biomethane, and hydrogen, in the network and help manage a resulting more complex system, building on innovative digital technologies. (16)Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 requires a candidate project of common interest to prove a significant contribution to at least one criterion from a set of criteria in the process for the elaboration of the Union list, which may, but does not need to, include sustainability. That requirement, in line with the specific needs of the internal energy market at the time, enabled development of projects of common interest which addressed only security of supply risks even if they did not demonstrate benefits in terms of sustainability. However, given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which “Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives and the "do no harm" principle of the European Green Deal, sustainability in terms of the integration of renewable energy sources into the grid or the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, as relevant, should be assessed in order to ensure that TEN-E policy is coherent with energy and climate policy objectives of the Union. The sustainability of CO2 transport networks is addressed by their purpose to transport carbon dioxide. (17)The Union should facilitate infrastructure projects linking the Union’s energy networks with third-country networks that are mutually beneficial and necessary for the energy transition and the achievement of the climate targets, and which also meet the specific criteria of the relevant infrastructure categories pursuant to this Regulation, in particular with neighbouring countries and with countries with which the Union has established specific energy cooperation. Therefore, this Regulation should include in its scope projects of mutual interest where they are sustainable and able to demonstrate significant net socio-economic benefits for at least two Member States and at least one third country. Such projects would be eligible for inclusion in the Union list upon conditions of regulatory approximation with the Union and upon demonstrating a contribution to the Union’s overall energy and climate objectives in terms of security of supply and decarbonisation. Such regulatory alignment or convergence should be presumed for the European Economic Area or Energy Community Contracting Parties. In addition, the third country with which the Union cooperates in the development of projects of mutual interest should facilitate a similar timeline for accelerated implementation and other policy support measures, as stipulated in this Regulation. Therefore, in this Regulation, projects of mutual interest should be considered in the same manner as projects of common interest with all provisions relative to projects of common interest applying also to projects of mutual interest, unless otherwise specified. (18)Furthermore, to achieve the Union’s 2030 and 2050 climate and energy targets and climate neutrality objective, Europe needs to significantly scale up renewable electricity generation. The existing infrastructure categories for electricity transmission and storage are crucial for the integration of the significant increase in renewable electricity generation in the power grid. In addition, that requires stepping up investment in offshore renewable energy. Coordinating long-term planning and development of offshore and onshore electricity grids should also be addressed. In particular, offshore infrastructure planning should move away from the project-by-project approach towards a coordinated comprehensive approach ensuring the sustainable development of integrated offshore grids in line with the offshore renewable potential of each sea basin, environmental protection and other uses of the sea. (19)Relevant Member States should be able to assess the benefits and costs of the afferent sea basin offshore grids for renewable energy and carry out a preliminary cost sharing analysis at sea basin level to underpin joint political commitments for offshore renewable energy development at sea-basis level. Therefore, the Commission should develop uniform principles for a cost-benefit and cost-sharing methodology for the deployment of the integrated offshore network development plans which should enable Member States to carry out an adequate assessment. (20)The Union-wide ten-year network development plan process as basis for the identification of projects of common interest in the categories of electricity and gas has proven to be effective. However, while the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity and for Gas (ENTSOs) and transmission system operators have an important role to play in the process, more scrutiny is required, in particular as regards defining the scenarios for the future, identifying long-term infrastructure gaps and bottlenecks and assessing individual projects, to enhance trust in the process. Therefore, due to the need for independent validation, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (‘the Agency’) and the Commission should have an increased role in the process, including in the process for drawing up the Union-wide ten-year network development plan pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council . (21)It is important to ensure that only infrastructure projects for which no reasonable alternative solutions exist may receive the status of project of common interest. For that purpose, the infrastructure gaps identification will follow the energy efficiency first principle and consider with priority all relevant non-infrastructure related solutions to address the identified gaps. In addition, during project implementation, project promoters should report on the compliance with environmental legislation and demonstrate that projects do no significant harm to the environment in accordance with Article 17 of Regulation (EC) 2020/852. For existing projects of common interest having reached sufficient maturity, this will be taken into account during project selection for subsequent Union list by the regional groups. (22)To ensure voltage and frequency stability, particular attention should be given to the stability of the European electricity network under the changing conditions, especially in view of the growing share of renewable electricity. (23)Following close consultations with all Member States and stakeholders, the Commission has identified 13 strategic trans-European energy infrastructure priorities, the implementation of which is essential for the achievement of the Union’s 2030 and 2050 energy and climate policy targets. Those priorities cover different geographic regions or thematic areas in the field of electricity transmission and storage, offshore grids for renewable energy, hydrogen transmission and storage, electrolysers, smart gas grids, smart electricity grids, and carbon dioxide transport. (24)Projects of common interest should comply with common, transparent and objective criteria in view of their contribution to the energy policy objectives. In order to be eligible for inclusion in the Union lists, electricity, and hydrogen projects should be part of the latest available Union-wide ten-year network development plan. As hydrogen infrastructure is not currently included in the Union-wide ten-year network development plan, this requirement for hydrogen projects should only apply as of 1 January 2024 for the purposes of the second Union list drawn pursuant to this Regulation. (25)Regional groups should be established for the purpose of proposing and reviewing projects of common interest, leading to the establishment of regional lists of projects of common interest. In order to ensure broad consensus, those regional groups should ensure close cooperation between Member States, national regulatory authorities, project promoters and relevant stakeholders. In the context of that cooperation, national regulatory authorities should, where necessary, advise the regional groups, inter alia on the feasibility of the regulatory aspects of proposed projects and on the feasibility of the proposed timetable for regulatory approval. (26)A new Union list of project of common interest (‘Union list’) should be established every two years. Projects of common interest that are completed or that no longer fulfil the relevant criteria and requirements as set out in this Regulation should not appear on the next Union list. For that reason, existing projects of common interest that are to be included in the next Union list should be subject to the same selection process for the establishment of regional lists and for the establishment of the Union list applied to proposed projects. However the resulting administrative burden should be reduced as much as possible, for example by using to the extent possible information submitted previously, and by taking account of the annual reports of the project promoters. To that end, existing projects of common interest that have made significant progress should benefit from a streamlined inclusion process in the Union-wide ten-year network development plan. (27)Projects of common interest should be implemented as quickly as possible and should be closely monitored and evaluated, while keeping the administrative burden for project promoters to a minimum. The Commission should nominate European coordinators for projects facing particular difficulties. The progress in the implementation of the specific projects as well as the fulfilment of the obligations pertaining to this Regulation should be taken into account in the selection process for subsequent Union lists for the respective projects. (28)The process of permit granting should neither lead to administrative burdens which are disproportionate to the size or complexity of a project, nor create barriers to the development of the trans-European networks and market access. (29)The planning and implementation of Union projects of common interest in the areas of energy, transport and telecommunication infrastructure should be coordinated to generate synergies whenever it is feasible from an overall economic, technical, environmental, climate or spatial planning point of view and with due regard to the relevant safety aspects. Thus, during the planning of the the various European networks, it should be possible to give preference to integrating transport, communication and energy networks in order to ensure that as little land as possible is taken up, whilst ensuring, where possible, that existing or disused routes are reused, in order to reduce to a minimum any negative social, economic, environmental, climate and financial impact. (30)Projects of common interest should be given ‘priority status’ at national level to ensure rapid administrative treatment and should be considered by competent authorities as being in the public interest. For reasons of overriding public interest, projects which have an adverse impact on the environment should be authorised where all the conditions set out in Council Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council are met.

(31)Projects of common interest should also be given ‘priority status’ at national level to ensure urgent treatment in all judicial and dispute resolution procedures relating to them. (32)In order to reduce complexity, increase efficiency and transparency and help enhance cooperation among Member States there should be a competent authority or authorities integrating or coordinating all permit granting processes (‘one-stop shop’). (33)In order to simplify and expedite the permitting process for offshore grids for renewable energy, the Member States around a particular sea basin should create unique points of contact, referred to as an ‘offshore one-stop shop’, in view of regional specificities and geography, for the for facilitating and coordinating the process of granting of permits to such projects. Moreover, the establishment of a one-stop shop per sea basin for offshore grids for renewable energy should reduce complexity, increase efficiency and speed up the permitting process of offshore transmission assets often crossing many jurisdictions. (34)Despite the existence of established standards ensuring the participation of the public in environmental decision-making procedures, which apply fully to projects of common interest, additional measures are still required under this Regulation to ensure the highest possible standards of transparency and public participation in all relevant issues in the permit granting process for projects of common interest. Where already covered by national rules under the same or higher standards as in this Regulation, the pre-consultation ahead of the permitting procedure should become optional and avoid duplication of legal requirements. (35)The correct and coordinated implementation of Directives 2011/92/EU and 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and where applicable, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters, signed in Aarhus on 25 June 1998 (the ‘Aarhus Convention’), and of the Espoo Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context (the ‘Espoo Convention’) should ensure the harmonisation of the main principles for the assessment of environmental and climate effects, including in a cross-border context. The Commission has issued guidance to support Member States in defining adequate legislative and non-legislative measures to streamline the environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure and to ensure the coherent application of environmental assessment procedures required under Union law for projects of common interest. Member States should coordinate their assessments for projects of common interest, and provide for joint assessments, where possible. Member States should be encouraged to exchange best practice and administrative capacity-building in the permit granting processes. (36)It is important to streamline and improve the process of permit granting, while respecting to the extent possible with due regard to the principle of subsidiarity, national competences and procedures for the construction of new infrastructure. Given the urgency of developing energy infrastructures, the simplification of the process of permit granting should set out a clear time limit for the decision of the respective authorities regarding the construction of the project. That time limit should stimulate a more efficient definition and handling of procedures, and should under no circumstances compromise the high standards for the protection of the environment in line with environmental legislation and public participation. This Regulation should establish maximum time limits, however Member States can strive to achieve shorter time limits where feasible and, in particular, as regards projects like smart grids, which may not require a complex permitting processes as that for transmission infrastructure. The competent authorities should be responsible for ensuring compliance with the time limits. (37)Member States can include in comprehensive decisions, where appropriate, decisions taken in the context of negotiations with individual landowners to grant access to, ownership of, or a right to occupy property, spatial planning which determines the general land use of a defined region, including other developments such as highways, railways, buildings and nature protection areas, which is not undertaken for the specific purpose of the planned project and granting of operational permits. In the context of the permit granting process, a project of common interest can include related infrastructure to the extent that it is essential for the construction or functioning of the project. This Regulation, in particular the provisions on permit granting, public participation and the implementation of projects of common interest, should apply without prejudice to international and Union law, including provisions to protect the environment and human health, and provisions adopted under the Common Fisheries and Maritime Policy, in particular Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. (38)The costs for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of projects of common interest should in general be fully borne by the users of the infrastructure. Projects of common interest should be eligible for cross-border cost allocation where an assessment of market demand or of the expected effects on the tariffs indicate that costs cannot be expected to be recovered by the tariffs paid by the infrastructure users. (39)The discussion on the appropriate allocation of costs should be based on the analysis of the costs and benefits of an infrastructure project carried out on the basis of a harmonised methodology for energy-system-wide analysis, using the same scenario used at the time when the project was included in the Union list of projects of common interest, in the framework of the Union-wide ten-year network development plans prepared by the European Networks of Transmission System Operators pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and (EC) No 715/2009, and reviewed by the Agency. That analysis can take into consideration indicators and corresponding reference values for the comparison of unit investment costs. (40)In an increasingly integrated internal energy market, clear and transparent rules for cost allocation across borders are necessary in order to accelerate investment in cross-border infrastructure. It is essential to ensure a stable financing framework for the development of projects of common interest while minimising the need for financial support. In deciding on cross-border cost allocation, national regulatory authorities should allocate investment costs across borders in their entirety and include them in the national tariffs, and, afterwards determine whether their impact on national tariffs could represent a disproportionate burden for consumers. The national regulatory authorities should avoid the risks of double support for projects by taking into account actual or estimated charges and revenues. Those charges and revenues should be taken into account only insofar as they relate to the projects and designed to cover the costs concerned. (41)The internal energy market legislation requires that tariffs for access to networks provide appropriate incentives for investment. However, several types of projects of common interest are likely to bring externalities that can possibly not be fully captured in and recovered through the regular tariff system. In applying the internal energy market legislation, national regulatory authorities should ensure a stable and predictable regulatory and financial framework with incentives for projects of common interest, including long-term incentives, that are commensurate with the level of specific risk of the project. That should apply in particular to cross-border projects, innovative transmission technologies for electricity allowing for large scale integration of renewable energy, of distributed energy resources or of demand response in interconnected networks, and energy technology and digitalisation projects which are likely to incur higher risks than similar projects located within one Member State, or, promise higher benefits for the Union. Moreover, projects with high operational expenditure should also have access to appropriate incentives for investment. In particular, offshore grids for renewable energy which serve the dual functionality of electricity interconnectors and connecting renewable offshore generation projects, are likely to incur higher risks than comparable onshore infrastructure projects, due to their intrinsic connection to generation assets which brings regulatory risks, financing risks such as the need for anticipatory investments, market risks and risks pertaining to the use of new innovative technologies. (42)This Regulation should apply only to the granting of permits for projects of common interest, public participation therein and their regulatory treatment. Member States can nevertheless adopt national provisions to apply the same or similar rules to other projects that do not have the status of projects of common interest within the scope of this Regulation. As regards the regulatory incentives, Member States can adopt national provision to apply the same or similar rules to projects of common interest falling under the category of electricity storage. (43)Member States that currently do not attribute the highest national significance possible to energy infrastructure projects as regards the process of permit granting, should be encouraged to consider introducing such a high national significance, in particular by evaluating whether that would lead to a quicker permit granting process. (44)Member States that do not currently have in place accelerated or urgent judicial procedures applicable to energy infrastructure projects should be encouraged to consider introducing such procedures, in particular by evaluating whether that would lead to a quicker implementation of such projects. (45)Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 has demonstrated the added value of leveraging private funding through significant Union financial assistance to allow the implementation of projects of European significance. In the light of the economic and financial situation, and budgetary constraints, targeted support, through grants and financial instruments, should continue under the multiannual financial framework, in order to attract new investors into the energy infrastructure priority corridors and areas, while keeping the budgetary contribution of the Union to a minimum. (46)Projects of common interest should be eligible to receive Union financial assistance for studies and, under certain conditions, for works pursuant to Regulation (EU)… [on a Connecting Europe Facility as proposed by COM(2018)438] in the form of grants or in the form of innovative financial instruments to ensure that tailor-made support can be provided to those projects of common interest which are not viable under the existing regulatory framework and market conditions. It is important to avoid any distortion of competition, in particular between projects contributing to the achievement of the same Union priority corridor. Such financial assistance should ensure the necessary synergies with the Structural Funds, in order to finance smart energy distribution networks and with the Union renewable energy financing mechanism pursuant to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1294. A three-step logic should apply to investments in projects of common interest. First, the market should have the priority to invest. Second, if investments are not made by the market, regulatory solutions should be explored, if necessary the relevant regulatory framework should be adjusted, and the correct application of the relevant regulatory framework should be ensured. Third, where the first two steps are not sufficient to deliver the necessary investments in projects of common interest, it should be possible to grant Union financial assistance where the project of common interest fulfils the applicable eligibility criteria. Projects of common interest may also be eligible under the InvestEU programme, which is complementary to grant financing. (47)Grants for works related to projects of mutual interest should be available only for the investments located on the territory of the Union and only in case where at least two Member States contribute financially in a significant manner to the investment costs of the project in view of its benefits. (48)Regulations (EC) No 715/2009, (EU) 2019/942, and (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directives 2009/73/EC and (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council should therefore be amended accordingly. (49)Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 should therefore be repealed. (50)In order to ensure that the composition of the priority corridors and thematic areas reflects in the best manner the development of energy infrastructure and that the number of candidate projects in each group remains appropriate and reasonable as to allow a comprehensive thorough assessment, and to ensure that the Union list of projects of common interest is limited to projects which contribute the most to the implementation of the strategic energy infrastructure priority corridors and thematic areas, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission:

- to supplement this Regulation by reviewing the scope and composition of the priority corridors and thematic areas and adopting new lists of priority corridors and thematic areas; - to amend annexes to this Regulation so as to adopt and review the Union list of projects of common interest, while respecting the right of the Member States and third countries to approve projects of common interest or projects of mutual interest related to their territory. Taking into account the need to ensure the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation, in view of the number of project on Union lists so far, the total number of projects of common interest should remain manageable, and therefore should not significantly exceed 220. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure the simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council. Where they consider this necessary, the European Parliament and the Council may each send experts to meetings of the Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts to which Member States' experts are invited. The discussions in the regional groups are instrumental for the Commission to adopt the delegated acts establishing the lists of projects of common interest. Therefore, it is appropriate, to the extent possible and compatible with the framework of this Regulation, that the European Parliament and Council are informed about and may send experts to the meetings of regional groups in line with the 2016 Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law Making. (51)In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation as regards cross-border cost allocation procedures and enable Member States to assess benefits and costs of the afferent sea basin offshore grids for renewable energy, in view also of the market and financial arrangements for the generation sites, such as support already granted, and carry out a preliminary cost sharing analysis at sea basin level, implementing powers in accordance with Article 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The advisory procedure should be used for the adoption of those implementing acts. (52)Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the development and interoperability of trans-European energy networks and connection to such networks, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives. HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Subject matter 1. This Regulation lays down guidelines for the timely development and interoperability of the priority corridors and areas of trans-European energy infrastructure set out in Annex I (‘energy infrastructure priority corridors and areas’) that contribute to the Union’s 2030 climate and energy targets and the climate neutrality objective by 2050. 2. In particular, this Regulation: (a) addresses the identification of projects of common interest necessary to implement priority corridors and areas falling under the energy infrastructure categories in electricity, smart gas grids, hydrogen, electrolysers, and carbon dioxide set out in Annex II (‘energy infrastructure categories’); (b) facilitates the timely implementation of projects of common interest by streamlining, coordinating more closely, and accelerating permit granting processes and by enhancing public participation; (c) provides rules and guidance for the cross-border allocation of costs and risk-related incentives for projects of common interest; (d) determines the conditions for eligibility of projects of common interest for Union financial assistance; (e) addresses the identification of projects of mutual interest. Article 2 Definitions In addition to the definitions in Directives 2009/73/EC, (EU) 2018/2001 and (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council and in Regulations (EC) No 715/2009, (EU) 2019/942, and (EU) 2019/943, the following definitions shall apply for the purposes of this Regulation:

(1)‘energy infrastructure’ means any physical equipment or facility falling under the energy infrastructure categories which is located within the Union, or linking the Union and one or more third countries; (2)‘comprehensive decision’ means the final decision or set of decisions taken by a Member State authority or authorities, not including courts or tribunals, that determines whether or not a project promoter is authorised to build the energy infrastructure to realise a project of common interest by having the possibility to start, or procure and start, the necessary construction works (‘ready-to-build status’) without prejudice to any decision taken in the context of an administrative appeal procedure; (3)‘project’ means one or several lines, pipelines, facilities, equipment or installations falling under the energy infrastructure categories; (4)‘project of common interest’ means a project necessary to implement the energy infrastructure priority corridors and areas set out in Annex I and which is part of the Union list of projects of common interest referred to in Article 3; (5)‘project of mutual interest’ means a project promoted by the Union in cooperation with third countries; (6)‘energy infrastructure bottleneck’ means limitation of physical flows in an energy system due to insufficient transmission capacity, which includes inter alia the absence of infrastructure; (7)‘project promoter’ means one of the following: (a)a transmission system operator (TSO), distribution system operator or other operator or investor developing a project of common interest; (b)where there are several TSOs, distribution system operators, other operators, investors, or any group thereof, the entity with legal personality under the applicable national law, which has been designated by contractual arrangement between them and which has the capacity to undertake legal obligations and assume financial liability on behalf of the parties to the contractual arrangement; (8)‘smart electricity grid’ means an electricity network where the grid operator can digitally monitor the actions of the users connected to it, and information and communication technologies (ICT) for communicating with related grid operators, generators, consumers and/or prosumers, with a view to transmitting electricity in a sustainable, cost-efficient and secure way; (9)‘smart gas grid’ means a gas network that makes use of innovative digital solutions to integrate in a cost efficient manner a plurality of low-carbon and renewable gas sources in accordance with consumers’ needs and gas quality requirements in order to reduce the carbon footprint of the related gas consumption, enable an increased share of renewable and low-carbon gases, and create links with other energy carriers and sectors; (10)‘authorities concerned’ means authorities that, under national law, are competent to issue different permits and authorisations related to the planning, design and construction of immovable assets, including energy infrastructure; (11)‘works’ means the purchase, supply and deployment of components, systems and services including software, the carrying out of development and construction and installation activities relating to a project, the acceptance of installations and the launching of a project; (12)‘studies’ means activities needed to prepare project implementation, such as preparatory, feasibility, evaluation, testing and validation studies, including software, and any other technical support measure including prior action to define and develop a project and decide on its financing, such as reconnaissance of the sites concerned and preparation of the financial package; (13) ‘national regulatory authority’ means a national regulatory authority designated in accordance with Article 39(1) of Directive 2009/73/EC or Article 57(1) of Directive (EU) 2019/944 or; (14) ‘commissioning’ means the process of bringing a project into operation once it has been constructed; (15)‘relevant national regulatory authorities’ means the national regulatory authorities in the Member States to which the project provides a significant positive impact; (16) ‘climate adaptation’ is a process that ensures that the resilience to the potential adverse impacts of climate change of energy infrastructure is ensured through a climate vulnerability and risk assessment, including through relevant adaptation measures. CHAPTER II

PROJECTS OF COMMON INTEREST AND PROJECTS OF MUTUAL INTEREST Article 3 Union list of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest 1. Regional groups shall be established (‘Groups’) as set out in Section 1 of Annex III. The membership of each Group shall be based on each priority corridor and