ARCHIVESHISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(81)343
Vol.1981/0109

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement(CEE,Euratom)n°354/83duConseildu1erfévrier1983
concernantl'ouvertureaupublicdesarchiveshistoriquesdelaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergieatomique(JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifiéparlerèglement(CE,Euratom)n°1700/2003du22septembre2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003,p.1),cedossierestouvertaupublic.Lecaséchéant,lesdocuments
classifiésprésentsdanscedossierontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance withCouncilRegulation(EEC,Euratom)No354/83of1February1983
concerningtheopeningtothepublicofthehistoricalarchivesoftheEuropeanEconomic
Community andtheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunity (OJL43,15.2.1983,p.1),as
amendedbyRegulation(EC,Euratom)No1700/2003of22September2003(OJL243,
27.9.2003,p.1),thisfileisopentothepublic.Wherenecessary,classifieddocuments inthis
filehavebeendeclassified inconformitywithArticle5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung(EWG,Euratom)Nr.354/83desRatesvom1.
Februar1983überdieFreigabederhistorischen ArchivederEuropäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI.L43vom15.2.1983,
S.1),geändertdurchdieVerordnung (EG,Euratom)Nr.1700/2003vom22.September2003
(ABI.L243vom27.9.2003,S.1),istdieseDateiderÖffentlichkeit zugänglich.Soweit
erforderlich,wurdendieVerschlusssachen indieserDateiinÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel5
dergenanntenVerordnungfreigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COM(81)343 final
1
'■'N.
Brussels,1stJuly1981
9THREPORT ONTHEACTIVITIES
OFTHEEUROPEAN SOCIALFUND
FINANCIAL YEAR1980
COM(81)343final

/
'agi
1
2
4
6
8
18
18
21
23
27
31
35
40
43
45
48
52TABLE OFCONTENTS
FOREWORD
INTRODUCTION
THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION INTHE COMMUNITY IN1980
NEW ,MEASURES RELATING TOTHE MANAGEMENT OFTHE
SOCIAL FUND
FINANCE AND BUDGET
ACTIVITIES BYFIELD OFINTERVENTION
1.Persons leaving agriculture
2.Persons working inthetextile andclothing
sectors
3.Migrants
4.Young People
5.Women
6.Regions
#
7.Technical Progress andGroups ofFirms
8.TheHandicapped
PILOT PROJECTS AND PREPARATORY STUDIES
REGIONAL IMPACT OFTHE SOCIAL FUND
COMMITTEE OFTHE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND

ANNEXES
Paqe
I. DEVELOPMENT OFTHE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION IN1980
1.Major economic variables 1974-1980 54
2.Youth unemployment rate -1980 55
3.Unemployment rates intheMember States 56
II.BUDGETARY RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR 1980
1.Appropriations for coinmitment available 57
2.Appropriations forpayment available 58
III .DESCRIPTION OFTHE UTILISATION OFBUDGETARY RESOURCES FOR 1980
1.Utilisation ofappropriations forcommitment 59
2.Utilisation ofappropriations forpayment 60
3.Utilisation ofappropriations forpayment (breakdown by
appropriations forpayment fortheyear andappropriations
carried over ) 61
4.Progress with regard tocommitments made 62
IV .RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE APPROPRIATIONS FOR COMMITMENT
AND REQUESTS FOR AID FOR 1980 63
V. AMOUNTS REQUESTED AND AMOUNTS REFUSED IN1980
1.Breakdown bybudget item 64
2.Breakdown byMember State 65
VT .BREAKDOWN OFREQUESTS FOR AID IN1980 66
VII. AMOUNTS APPROVED IN1980
Breakdown byMember State andbybudget item 67
VIII .BREAKDOWN OFAPPROPRIATIONS APPROVED IN1980 BY
ABSOLUTE PRIORITY REGIONS 68
IX .COMMITMENTS 1973-1980
Breakdown ofaidbycountry oforigin ofpromoters 69
X. PAYMENTS MADE IN1973-1980 ACCORDING TOTHE COUNTRY
OFORIGIN' OFPROMOTERS AND THE YEAR OFCOMMITMENT 70
XI .SITUATION OFAMOUNTS PAID IN1980 BYCOUNTRY AND
YEAR OFCOMMITMENT 71
XII .AMOUNTS RELEASED IN1980 FOR RE-USE (RELEASED FROM
COMMITMENTS IN1979 ) 72
XIII .ADVANCES PAID IN1980 AGAINST COMMITMENTS MADE FROM 1977 TO
1980 AND SUCH PAYMENTS ASAPERCENTAGE OFTOTAL PAYMENTS 73
XIV .ESTIMATED NUMBER OFBENEFICIARIES BYINTERVENTION SECTOR
FOR 1979 AT© 1980 74
XV .LIST OFPREPARATORY STUDIES AND PILOT SCHEMES ASSISTED
FROM THE 1980BUDGET 75
XVI .LIST OFREQUESTS FORAIDAPPROVED IN1980 81

-1-
FOREWORD
This istheannual report oftheEuropean Social Fund for1980
submitted bytheCommission totheEuropean Parliament andthe
Council inaccordance with Article 6ofCouncil Regulation (EEC )
No858/72"'"which reads asfollows ;
"Every year theCommission shall ,before 1July ,submit tothe
European Parliament andtothe Council ,areport ontheactivities
oftheFund carried outduring thepast financial year giving
inter alia abreakdown oftheappropriations committed foroperations
during that financial year .Thereport shall also cover the
foreseeable developments inthecoming three years regarding
expenditure relating toactions undertaken pursuant toArticles 4
and 5ofDecision 71/66/EEC ".
Soasnot todelay thesubmission ofthis report theCommission 's
position regarding Fund expenditure inthecoming years -still
under consideration atthetime ofwriting -isnotincluded butwill be
given inthepreliminary Draft Budget for1982 .(SeeAnnex toVolume 7-
Triennial Financial estimates 1982-85 ).
2Under Article 5ofCommission Decision 78/706/EEC ,Member States
were reguired tofurnish by31March 1981 national reports on
operations assisted bythe Fund .Only oneMember State met
this deadline andbymid-May ,three other reports were still
outstanding .When allthereports areavailable ,they will be
forwarded asaseparate annex tothis report .
OJNoL337of27.12.1977 ,P.5.
2OJNoL238of30.8.1978 .

-2-
INTRODUCTION
The labour market situation in1980 ,theyear under review in
thepresent report ,continued todeteriorate with registered
unemployment rising from anaverage of6.04 million in1979
(5.6% oftheactive population )to6.8million (6.2% )in1980 .
TheSocial Fundcommitments budget in1980was909.5 mECU^and
acarry-over of112.4 mECUfrom theprevious year brought total
resources available in1980 upto1,022 mECU .Fund grants
approved in1980 totalled 1,014.9 mECU ,31%greater than in
theprevious year ,benefitting anestimated 1.5million people
intheCommunity .Thevolume ofapplications reached
1,625 mECU ,theequivalent ofabout 159% oftotal appropriations .
Theselection ofapplications tobefinanced wasdecided bythe
Commission intwoseries -inJune andOctober respectively -after
consultation with the Social Fund Committee and inaccordance
with criteria setout intheGuidelines fortheManagement ofthe
2European Social Fund fortheperiod 1980-82 . While taking
account ofthesocial andeconomic situation intheCommunity
theGuidelines recognised theneed togive priority totraining
operations most closely linked toemployment ,aswell as
recognising theneed toproduce askilled workforce inareas of
theCommunity suffering decline inorder toattract investment .
Approximately 88%ofaidwas forthetraditional activities of
training ,retraining andresettlement ofworkers with the
balance ofaround 12%devoted tojobcreation schemes foryoung
people and ,toalesser extent ,employment programmes forworkers ,
regardless ofage ,intheregions qualifying foraidfrom the
European Regional Development Fund .
Once again thefields ofregions (42% )andyoung people (39% )
accounted for more than four-fifths ofSocial Fund aid .
The special priority accorded intheselection criteria tothe
absolute priority regions -Greenland ,French Overseas Departments ,
Ireland ,Northern Ireland and theMezzogiorno -wascontinued in
"'"TheEuropean Currency Unit ,introduced inDecember 1980inplace ofthe
former unit ofaccount ,isused inthis report .
OJNoC159of26.6.1979 ,page 2

-3-
1980 .Aidapproved forthese regions ,helped also bythefact
that they benefit from grants 10%higher than therest ofthe
Community ,amounted to334mECU ,14%upontheprevious year
andequivalent toone-third oftotal commitments approved .
Further progress wasachieved onpayments in1980 andbytheendof
November allavailable payment appropriations hadbeen used .
Theprovision ofasupplementary budget on23December 1980
made itpossible toincrease total payments to735mECU ,
23.4% more than intheprevious year .

-4-
I. THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION INTHE COMMUNITY IN1980
Employment
Despite thehigh number outofwork ,employment intheCommunity
increased slightly over theprevious year toreach anall-time
high above itsprevious peak of1974 .Thetrend during 1980 ,
however ,taking into account thedevelopment ofGDPand
industrial activity pointed toanendofthefour-year period
ofgrowth inemployment .The United Kingdom was thefirst
Member State toshow falls inemployment indicators ,butby
autumn ,Germany was theonly Member State maintaining joblevels .
Anet 2million jobs have been created intheCommunity since 1976 ,
about 90%ofwhich were filled bywomen whose employment
continues tobeconcentrated largely intraditional branches and
sectors ).Two-thirds were employed intheservices -commerce ,hotels
andrestaurants ,bank andinsurance -bringing thefemale share
ofemployment inthesector toaround 45% .Aquarter ofjobs in
theindustrial sector were filled bywomen ;over half ofthese
were intextiles ,leather goods ,footwear andclothing and
electronic andinstrument engineering .
Employment intheagricultural sector continued todecline in1980 to
7.5% oftotal Community employment ccnpared with 7.6% theprevious year
and8.6% in1975 .Industry ,accounting for39%oftotal jobs ,also
declined ,with joblosses in1980 exceeding thetotal fortheprevious
four years .Theworst hitbranches -mining ,steel ,shipbuilding ,textiles
andclothing ,footwear andmechanical engineering -suffered an
aggregate loss of700,000 jobs since 1976 .Employment growth
inindustry wasmainly confined toparts oftheenergy sector
and ,until mid-1980 ,theautomobile industry .
Expansion ofemployment intheservices sector ,which hasseen
thecreation ofanet 2.9million new jobs since 1976 ,bringing
this sector 'sshare oftotal employment to54% ,hasbeen most
marked inbanking ,insurance ,finance andthepublic services .
There was ,however ,aslight down -turn inservice sector employment
intheUnited Kingdom in1980 attributable mainly toareduction
ofposts inthepublic services butalso inbanking andinsurance .

Unemployment
Unemployment intheCommunity rose frcia 5.7% attheendof1979
to7.3% byDecember 1980 ,theaverage rate fortheyear being
6.2% .Thebiggest increases were intheUnited Kingdom (66%),
Denmark (56% )andtheNetherlands (49%).
Thehighest average unemployment rates fortheyear 1980 were ,
however ,those ofBelgium 9.4% ,Ireland 8.4% andItaly 8.1% .
Theincrease inunemployment isdueboth tothecontinued growth
oftheactive population atanannual rate ofabout 700,000 and
thereduction ofthesupply ofemployment which evolved into a
significant net loss ofjobs astheyear progressed .Unlike the
twopreceding years ,male unemployment increased more than the
female rate butwomen still accounted for45%oftheunemployed
andtheir unemployment rate at7.5% wassignificantly higher
than that ofmen (5.5% ).
Youth unemployment ataround 40%ofthetotal remained atthesame
proportion astheprevious year ,an^theunemployment rate ofyoung
women wassomewhat higher than among adults .Youth unemployment rates
ineach Member States aregiven inAnnex 1(2).
Registered jobvacancies attheendoftheyear were attheir
lowest ever intheCommunity ,410,000 ;over half ofthese were
inGermany .
Commission documents
Asacontribution towards themaximisation ofrecovery chances
andimproving theemployment situation ,theCommission presented
anumber ofcommunications during 1980 totheCouncil and the
Standing Committee onEmployment .Thesubjects covered included
theadaptation ofthelabour force tonewmicro-electronic
1_ .... - .. ..,.2technology ;Community guidelines foralabour market policy ;
3 ... .4 ..... . .5temporary work ;part-time work ;andflexible retirement .
OJNoC/247of24.9.1980 ,p.2.
20JNoC/168of8.7.1980 ,p.1.
3CCM (80)351PINAL of27.6.1980
4CQM(80)405 FINAL of17.7.1980
"CQM(80)393 FINAL Of14.7.1980

-6-
II .NEW MEASURES RELATING TOTHE MANAGEMENT OFTHE SOCIAL FUND
Amendments ofDecisions regarding fields oftextiles and
clothing ,migrants ,young persons ,women
TheCouncil ,ontheproposal oftheCommission andhaving regard
totheopinions oftheEuropean Parliament and theEconomic and
Social Committee ,extended 1upto31December 1982thecurrency
ofthe above-mentioned decisions which would otherwise have
expired on31December 1980 .
Shipbuilding
2TheCommission submitted on31May1980 aproposal for the
creation ofanew Social Fund aid for the income maintenance
ofworkers intheshipbuilding industry .Favourable opinions
onthisproposal wereformulated bytheEuropean Parliament ^
4and theEconomic and Social Committee .The proposal was
considered ,butnotadopted ,attheCouncil meeting of
Employment andSocial Affairs on27November 1980 .
Higher intervention rate for Greece
TheCommission submitted aproposal on17November 1980^
toapply the10%higher intervention rate provided for in
Regulation (EEC )2895/77^toallofGreece except Athens
and Salonica .This matter had notbeen decided bythe
end oftheyear .
Unit costs
Commission officials and the national administrations
carried outatrial operation in1980 ontheuseofunit
costs asenvisaged inRegulation (EEC )No2396/71.
"'"Decision 80/117/EEC ; OJNol332of10.12.1980 ,p.17.
OJNo C218of 26.8.1980 ,p.16.
3 ___OJNoC300of31.12.1980 ,page 105
^Doc .NoESC1222/80of19.11.1980 .
COM (80)742FINAL of17.11.1980
6OJNo337of27.12.1977 .
7OJNoL349of10.11.1971 ,p.54.

-7-
Itbecame clear from this trial that afurther andmore
extended experiment wasneeded before itwould bepossible
toformulate legislative proposals inthis matter .
Grouped applications
1980 was thefirst year ofoperation ofthenewsystem of
grouped applications provided for intheabove Regulation .
Although theextent ofgrouping achieved varied indegree ,
adefinite contribution toefficiency wasnoted inthe
reduction ofthenumber ofindividual administrative operations
inconnection both with commitments andpayments .
Guidelines
Inaccordance with Article 3(a )ofCouncil Regulation (EEC )
No2396/71theCommission adopted Guidelines fortheManagement
oftheFundfortheperiod 1981-83."' "These include thecriteria
tobeapplied toeach field ofintervention inthe
selection ofapplications forapproval atthevarious
levels ofpriority .Thenecessity forthem arises from
thefact that thevolume ofapplications substantially
exceeds available appropriations .Theguidelines for
1981-83 ,which continues themain lines ofthebasis
forselection forthepreceding period inmost fields of
intervention ,constituted ,nevertheless ,aconsiderable
simplification inform ascompared with those previously in
force .Themain substantive charges occurred intheyoung
persons field where theimportance accorded tovocational
preparation wasextended also tovocational training ,and a
greater degree ofpriority wasgiven tooperations inthe
absolute priority regions ,zones ofindustrial reconversion
andcertain kinds ofprogrammes ,like those catering forneeds
notsupplied byexisting systems andprogrammes linking work
and training .
■^OJNoC119of14.5.1980 ,p.2.

-8-
III .FINANCE AND BUDGET
A. COMMITMENTS
1.Available appropriations
The Budgetary Authority allocated appropriations of909.5 mECU
tothecommitments budget oftheSocial Fund fortheyear 1980
made upofChapters 50,51and 52ofthegeneral budget ofthe
European Communities forthat year .With theaddition of
appropriations of112.4 mECUcarried forward consisting mainly
ofrefunds available too late in1979 for recommitment within
thesame year,"' "thetotal amount available forcommitment in
1980 was 1,021.92 mECU ,or19.4% more than in1979 .
Thevolume ofavailable refunds ,over double that oftheprevious
year ,reflects agreater degree ofobservance intheMember
States oftheobligation tonotify over-estimations tothe
Commission before theendoftheyear following that inwhich
theprogrammes towhich they relate were approved .This prevented
what would have been losses ofappropriations totheFund .
Some cases persist ,however ,offailure tonotify refunds
before theexpiry ofthedeadline .This led theCommission
tointroduce intheGuidelines for theManagement oftheFund
for theperiod 1981-83 measures todiscourage such omissions
onthepart ofpromoters .
The Commission considers that the end of1981 will bean
appropriate stage atwhich toexanine indetail theresults
ofthenewrefunds system .Thenext annual report will contain ,
therefore ,precise figures onappropriations lost totheSocial
Fund through failure tonotify theCommission intime .All the
indications are ,however ,that thenewsystem hadled to
considerable improvements ontheold interms ofover-estimations
being made available forreallocation and ,consequently ,ina
reduction inappropriations lost totheFund .
^"Includes alsocarry-over of5mECUforindustrial reconversion
(heading 5120 )forwhich newappropriations were notprovided in
the1980 budget intheabsence ofafavourable decision bytheCouncil
ontheCommission 'sproposal forthecreation ofaSocial Fund aidfor
theincome maintenance ofredundant workers inshipbuilding .

-9-
Annex 11(1 )gives adetailed breakdown of1980 commitment
appropriations asbetween actions carried outunder Articles 4
and5ofDecision 71/66/EEC"' "andArticle 7ofCouncil Regulation
2
(EEC )No2893/77andthevarious fields ofintervention
authorised under these Articles .Itwill benoted that 99%of
available appropriations were committed ;,total commitments were
up23.6% ontheprevious year .
Applications forassistance were considered bytheCommission in
twobatches ,after consultation with theSocial Fund Committee and
commitments were decided inMay (42%oftotal )andOctober (58%).
2.Volume ofapplications
Thevolume ofapplications forassistance from theFund amounted
to1,625.55 mECU ,anincrease of23%over 1979 andexceeded
total appropriations by59% . Theexcess ofapplications over
resources wastherefore inthesame proportion astheprevious
year .Therelative stability oftheguidelines inrecent
years ,thepractice ofpublishing them intheyear preceding their
coming into operation ,andthegreater knowledge among promoters
oftheselection criteria seems tohave ledtoacertain degree of
voluntary restraint inthesubmission ofapplications which would
notqualify forahigh degree ofpriority .
Inabsolute terms ,thefields ,ofregions 696.46 mECU )andyoung
persons (598.14 mECU )attracted thegreatest volume of
applications ,butinrelation toavailable appropriations ,
migrants atmore than three times thebudget andwomen atmore
than twice ,were thefields inwhich theshortage offunds
was most acute .
Classification ofapplications
Ofthetotal applications submitted totheSocial Fund ,
14.95 mECU (0.9% )were classified aseither inadmissible
orineligible .Theremainder were examined forpriority
3according totheGuidelines fortheManagement oftheFund
relative tothevarious fields ofintervention ,described
inChapter IV.This resulted intheclassification by
1OJNoL28of4.2.1971 ,p.15;OJNoL337of27.12.1977 ,p.8.
2OJNoL337of27.12.1977 ,p.1.
OJNo C116 of19.5.1978 .

-10-
priority level indicated inthefollowing table .
(Itwill benoted that thenumber ofpriority levels isnot
constant for allfields -there wasonly oneforagriculture and
textiles ,forexample ,butfive forregions .)
mECU
Field of
Intervention1st
priority2nd
priority3rd
priority4th
priority5th
priorityNon-
priority
AGRICULTURE 15.71 0.55
TEXTILES 18.90 3.71
YOUNG PEOPLE -
Training aids 218.65 70.84 2.93 173.20
YOUNG PEOPLE -
Employment aids 18.03 16.48 75.50 18.21
MIGRANTS 85.66 77.10
WOMEN 13.86 54.90 1.03
REGIONS 228.28 7.49 100.36 33.04 202.27 25.02
TECHNICAL PROGRESS 15.28 3.18 3.14 1.64 0.23
GROUPS OFFIRMS 2.65 -
HANDICAPPED 33.72 43.93 40.65
TOTAL 650.74 196.82 181.93 34.68 202.27 339.70

-11-
Itwill benoted that applications accorded priority classification ,
1,266.44 mECU ,exceeded total available resources bysome 244mECU ,
i.e. about 24% .Theuseoftheweighted reduction method was ,
therefore ,necessary inseveral fields ofintervention .
Asprovided forintheGuidelines fortheManagement oftheRind
weighted reduction isapplied where ,atthelowest priority level
forwhich appropriations arestill available ,thevolume of
applications exceeds that ofsuch appropriations .Aweighted
reduction coefficient iscalculated for each Member State onthe
basis oftheaverage unemployment rate andthegross domestic
product percapita atcurrent exchange rates .This takes account
oftheunemployment situation invarious parts oftheCommunity and
therelative economic capacity oftheMember States todeal with it.
Thetotal amount tobededucted isobtained byapplying the
appropriate coefficient tothevolume ofapplications from each
Member State classified atthepriority level subject tothe
weighted reduction .Theamount thus arrived atisapportioned
bytheCommission between theindividual applications after
consultation with thenatipnal authorities .Excluded ,asfaras
possible ,from thereduction areoperations intheabsolute priority
regions andprogrammes byprivate organisations heavily dependent on
Fund aid .
Thefollowing table shows theresults oftheapplication ofthemethod
in1980 inthose fields ofintervention where itproved necessary .mECu
Field of
InterventionTotal
committed
ICarimi tted
without
weighted
reduction
IIAmount
subjected
toweighted
reduction
IIIAmount of
IIIagreed
IVWeighted
reduction
V
YOUNG PEOPLE -
Training aids 283.66 273.28 14.62 10.38 4.24
MIGRANTS 37.66 0.15 85.65 37.51 48.14
WOMEN 20.95 13.86 54.90 7.09 47.81
REGIONS 423.78 355.72 202.01 68.06 133.95
TOTAL 766.05 643.01 357.18 123.04 234.14

-12-
Apart from migrants ,forwhich there was acritical shortage
offunds ,described inmore detail inChapter IV(iii ),first
priority applications ,itwill benoted ,were metwithout
reduction .Thegreatest volume ofreduction was inthe
regions field but theproportion ofapplications subjected
toreduction washighest inmigrants ,followed bywomen 's;
inboth cases the volume reduced exceeded the volume committed .
Theoverall volume oftheweighted reduction in1980 at
234mECU ,theequivalent of13.8% oftotal priority applications ,
isaconsiderable improvement over the30-32% level ofprevious
years .Indeciding onselection criteria ,theCommission is
conscious oftheneed toavoid toogreat aproportion ofthe
Fund being distributed through theweighted reduction .But
unpredictability ofapplications andbudgetary shortages make
this difficult .TheCommission will continue tokeep the
system under examination ,especially inconnection with the
forthcoming review oftheFund .
mECU
CountryApplications
subject to
reductionWeighted
reduction
indicatorAmounts
allocated *Amounts allocated
as%ofapplication
subject toreduction *
Belgium 11.00 1.25 5.16 46.90
Denmark 7.16 0.64 1.73 24.16
Germany 176.44 0.43 29.09 16.68
France 70.02 0.95 28.92 41.30
Ireland 0.14 - 0.14 100.00
Italy 24.23 2.24 22.01 90.84
Luxembourg- 0.09 - -
Netherlands 3.33 0.61 0.59 17.72
United Kingdom 66.86 1.38 35.40 52.95
Total 357.18 - 123.04 34.45
*Theamounts allocated donotdepend ontheweighted reduction indicator
alone butalso onthedegree ofmismatch between applications and
available appropriations ineach field ofintervention andthevolume
ofapplications perMember State .

-13-
Article 9(2 )ofCouncil Decision 71/66/EEC
This provision requires that atleast 50%ofthebudget ofthe
fund bereserved each year foroperations carried outunder
Article 5oftheabove Decision intheEuropean Regional
Development Fund regions .
The effect ofthis provision in1980 was asfollows :
mECU
I Budget 909 .50
II Tobecommited tooperations under Article 5
inERDF Regions (50%oftotal ) 454.75
III Budget foroperations under Article 5of
Decision EEC/71/66 469.50
IV Appropriations available forcommitment under
Article 5outside ERDF Régions (III-II ) 14.75
This calculation results inasumofonly 14.75 mECUfor
commitment tooperations outside theERDF regions inthefields
oftechnical progress ,groups offirms andthehandicapped ,but
asmentioned inChapter IVusewasmade oftheextra appropriations
available asrefunds toease the situation .

-14-
B. PAYMENTS
1.Volume ofappropriations
Social Fund payment appropriations amounted to933.86 mECU in
1980 .13%higher than theprevious year andwere made upasfollows :
inECI.JProvided bytheBudgetary Authority ■–-
atthebeginning oftheyear : 374.30
Carried forward from 1979 : 233.16
Provided bytheBudgetary Authority ina
supplementary budget (No2)attheendoftheyedi :326.4
933.86
2.Payments effected
The improvement inthevolume ofpayments noted in1979 showed
afurther advance in1980 amounting tosome 735mECU ,23.4%
more than theprevious year .With payments reaching 607.46 mECU
bytheendofNovember theoriginal budgetary allocation and the
carry-over from 1979 were fully utilised ;this was thereason
for theCommission 'srequest for asupplementary budget of100mECU .
The Budgetary Authority infact allocated asupplementary budget of
326.40 mECUfrom which itproved possible tomake payments
amounting to127.72 mECUbytheendoftheyear .
Payments effected thus amounted to100% ofappropriations
available atthebeginning oftheyear andalmost 80%oftotal
credits for theyear ;theproportion ofavailable commitments
used in1979 was 71.8% .Despite thefact that thesupplementary
budget became available only on23December ,thebalance ofunused
payment commitments attheend of1980 was less than 200mECU
asconpared with 233mECUtwelve months earlier .
3.Payments procedures
Theimproved payments situation wasdue tothemore efficient
usebytheCommission andMember States ofthenewpayment
procedures which came into operation in1978 .In1980 the total

-15-
number ofpayment orders anddecommitments 1numbered 3,017 ,almost
50%higher than theprevious year .About 41%ofpayments
(300mECU )in1980 related tocommitments made inthesame year
compared with 20%in1979 andonly 5%in1978 .This reflects
theincreasing extent towhich promoters andMember States are
making useoftheadvance payments system .Indeed two-thirds
ofalladvance payments in1980 related tocommitments entered
into inthesame year ;about 29%ofcommitments made in1980
were paid within theyear .While this isaconsiderable
improvement onthepast ,theCommission considers 33%tobea
reasonable target inthis regard .This would have increased
payments in1980 byabout 40mECU .
Thefollowing table shows thebreakdown ofpayments made in1980
byMember State andyear ofexecution oftheoperations towhich
they related .
mECU
Country 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Total
Belgium– – 0.01 0.09 0.56 7.97 0.26 8.89
Denmark 0.64 3.69 2.21 8.02 14.56
Germany– – 0.04 3.34 21.90 18.76 30.76 74.80
France 0.01 0.77 2.59 39.01 51.81 39.44 59.38 193.01
Ireland – – 0.01 4.67 10.46 14.58 41.77 71.49
Italy 0.03 2.08 6.96 17.01 16.56 88.20 68.85 199.69
Luxembourg 0.18 – – 0.18
Netherlands – – – 0.79 2.67 0.77 0.22 4.45
United Kingdom– 0.07 0.01 12.18 42.57 19.30 88.70 162.83
TOTAL 0.04 2.92 9.62 77.73 150.40 191.23 297.96 729.90
Commission Decision 78/706/EECwhich prescribes aneighteen-month
deadline from theenddate oftheoperations forthesubmission
ofthefinal payment claim hashad abeneficial effect onthe
clearing ofarrears . Between 1978 and1979 ,forexample ,before
this provision applied ,thevolume ofnewcommitment appropriations
made available totheFund was8%lower than thebudget forthe
"'"Forexample amounts notclaimed orrefused following the
examination offinal payment claims aredecommitted .

-16-
preceding year andthebalance ofcommitments forwhich payment
claims hadnotbeen made rose by28% (seetable below ).In
1979 ,thefirst year ofthenewrule ,newcommitments were up
more than 36%ontheprevious year ,buttheunclaimed balance
rose byless than 10% .1980 showed afurther improvement with
theaddition ofnewcommitments 31%greater than theprevious
year butanincrease ofjust over 4%intheunclaimed balance .
YearCommitment
appropriations%
variationBalance ofpayment
commitments at
year end%
variation
1977 616.63 – 953.37 –
1978 568.08 -7.87 1,221.15 +28.09
1979 774.45 +36.32 1,341.00 +9.81
1980 1,014.93 +31.05 1,399.88 +4.24
Thefollowing analysis oftheunclaimed commitments situation shows
that the balance which could have been claimed atthe end of1980
isestimated at472 mECU .
mECU
Total outstanding commitments on31.12.1980 1,400
Deduct :
Likely volume ofcancellations 120
Commitments made prior to1.1.1980
relating toyears 1981/82 (estimate ) 250
Commitments made in1980 onwhich
payments could nothave been claimed
inthesame year (estimate ) 500
Payment applications being processed
bytheCommission 58
928
Unclaimed balance 472
Thefollowing table shows that theincreased volume ofpayments

-17-
in1980 wasduetoanincrease incomplementary andfinal
payments rather than advances .
mECU
Year Advance payments ^Complementary and
final paymentsTotal
1979
1980441.79 (74.3% )
479.08 (65.6% )152.81 (25.7% )
250.82 (34.4% )594.60
729.90
Includes (a)payments onaccount in1979 under theformer
payments system amounting to10.94% oftotal ;and
(b)in1979 and 1980 both first andsecond advances .
Astheinitial advances (30%payable atthebeginning of
programmes )areheavily availed of,scope forfurther
improvement inthepayments situation lies inthesecond
advances (30%payable atthehalf-way stage )which seem to
beunder-used and ,indeed ,insome cases notapplied for
atall .

-18-
IV .ACTIVITIES BYFTELD OFINTERVENTION
1.Persons leaving agriculture
Volume ofapplications andbudgetary allocation (commitments )
Theincrease noted inthevolume ofprogrammes submitted under
Council Decision 72/428/EEC"^toassist persons leaving
agriculture wasnotsustained in1980 ,thetotal amountirxg to
16.3mECUascompared with 15.5 oiECUintheprevious year .
This relative weakness ofdemand wasanticipated inthe
O
conbined budgetary provision of29mECUforagriculture ,
textiles andclothing down over 17%onthe1979 figure .Refunds
from operations approved inprevious years ,however ,amounted
to12mECUandenabled allpriority applications -amounting
to15.8 mECU inthecase ofagriculture -tobemet .A
balance of6mECUremained fortransfer toease thesevere
budgetary shortage inmigrant workers described in (iii )below .
Selection guidelines andgeneral characteristics ofapplications
Priority wasaccorded toprogrammes either relating exclusively
topersons leaving agriculture orcarried outinthehill-fanning
anddisadvantaged areas ^orinzones withanagricultural income
below the Community average .
Thebulk oftheapplications fell within thefirst category and
indeed frequently their location would have also made then
eligible under thesecond .Asinprevious years ,French
applications accounted formost oftheaidrequested (two-thirds
in1980 ).These included alarge national programme byapublic
body ,CMASEA ,setuptocater fortheneeds ofthefarming
Community .Another French application grouped together programmes
bythree different ministries for farmers inzones with an
agricultural income percapita below theCommunity average .In
these cases ,thenewjobs envisaged were inbuilding andpublic
OJNoL291of28.12.1972 ,p.58;OJNoL337of27.12.1977 ,p.10.
2Separate provision ismade inthe1981 budget forthese fields .
3Council Directive 75/286/EEC ;OJNoL128of19.5.1975 ,p.1.

-19-
works ,metallurgy ,electromechanics andagricultural related
industries aswell asadministrative ,public health andthe
trade sector .
Smaller French programmes were related tothedevelopment needs
ofsmall areas with serious depopulation problems .These
included training fornewfood-processing industries in
Brittany which originated from apilot experiment carried out
with Fund aid\
2Apilot experiment formed thebasis ofanother interesting
French programme which provided thenecessary training
back-up toaninnovatory programme for thesetting upof
local initiatives topromote employment in17different mountain
3zones remote from normal training facilities .These programmes
which -tojudge bySocial Fund applications invarious fields -
seem tobeagrowing phenomenon ,provided training forover
2,000persons .Theskills covered included both thesetting
upandmanagement ofthenew forms ofeconomic activity and
services aswell asbroadly based training intourism ,the
crafts ,environmental protection andprocessing andmarketing
ofgoods produced locally .Paramedical ,cultural ,social and
educational training wasalso available inanendeavour to
:
prevent adrain ofresources frcm these regions .
Italian applications ,which showed aconsiderable increase over
theprevious year ,also concentrated mainly ontraining for
persons leaving agriculture inmountain orless-developed
zones .Programmes carried outbytheregional authorities
ofLombardy andVeneto andajoint social institution envisaged
thetraining ofmore than 3,800 people invarious sectors such
asbuilding ,precision equipment ,office work andhealth and
social services .Other Italian applications were aimed at
E.P. NÔ35/77.
2E.P.NO93/77.
IntheAlpine region ofProvence -theRiviera (intheUpper
Alps ,theAlps ofUpper Provence ,theMaritime Alps )andin
theAlpine region oftheRhone (intheDrone ,Isere and
Savoie ).

-20-
lrtparting complementary skills toabout 1,380 farm workers in
theMezzogiorno ,theAosta Valley andthenorth-central regions
tohelp them tosupplement their agricultural incomes .
Asinprevious years anapplication from Germany benefitted
nearly 800trainees inhill farming areas and those with an
income below theCommunity average .Twotraining programmes
were submitted from Ireland ,thefirst inresponse totheneeds
ofsmall andmedium-sized firms (930 trainees )and the second
exclusively forthose whohave left agriculture fortraining
asnurses (206trainees ). Asmaller Dutch programme concerned
theretraining of25farmers intheclothing ,administrative
and service sectors .
Beneficiaries
Programmes approved in1980 areestimated tocover about
16,700 persons .

-21-
2.PERSONS WORKING INTHE TEXTILE AND CLOTHING SECTORS
Volume ofapplications andbudgetary allocation
Thevolume ofapplications forassistance forworkers inthetextile
andclothing sectors provided forunder Council Decision 76/206/EEC ^"
was ,at22.6 mECU ,40%upontheprevious year .This reversal of
thediminishing trend ofrecent years reflected theneed ofsomany
firms inthis sector torestructure orreconvert tosurvive the
present crisis .
Thecombined budgetary provision foragriculture andtextiles was
29mECU ,over 17% less than in1979 ,butthe
availability ofrefunds brought thefigure upto41mECU .
Ofthis <18.9 mECUwasallocated totextiles andclothing ,an
amount which corresponded tothevolume ofpriority applications .
Selection guidelines andgeneral characteristics ofapplications
Asin1979 ,priority wasawarded totwocategories ofoperations :
(1)forpersons intextile-producing areas ofhigh unemployment
having toleave thesector tofind other kinds ofjobs ;
(2)forretraining within thesector intypes ofproduction with
prospects ofviability atCommunity level .
Most applications were submitted bypublic training authorities
but there wasanincrease ofprogrammes concerning firms ,
especially from theUnited Kingdom andItaly .
Themajority ofapplications (80% )-asin .1979 -were inthesecond category
mentioned above andrelated toretraining within thesector linked
toincreasing productivity ,adapting production tochanging market
OJNoL39of14.2.1976 ,p.39;OJNoL337of27.12.1977 ,p.10.

-22-
needs ,andplant organisation including new tasks andthe
reorganisation ofwork .Thequestion ofviability frequently
necessitated detailed examination .Asinprevious years ,some
programmes -especially those relating togroups offirms -were
accepted onthebasis ofguarantees onviability bytheMember
States subject toverification during implementation .Examples
ofapplications notaccorded priority ontheissue ofviability
were those relating tonylon tights ,cotton-spinning and
synthetic fibres .
Theremaining 20%ofeligible priority applications came within
the first category andconcerned thetraining ofworkers leaving
textiles andclothing for awide variety ofother sectors .They
included ,typically ,construction ,metal work ,electronics ,chemical
manufacture andtextile machinery aswell asadministrative employment .
Beneficiaries
Programmes approved in1980 ,which amounted to18.9 mECUare
estimated tobenefit around 17.300 workers .

-23-
3.MIGRANTS
Volume ofapplications andbudgetary allocation
Thevolume ofapplications forSocial Fund aidformigrant workers
andtheir families ,inaccordance with Council Decision 77/803/EEC(l )
rose from 101mECU in1979 to163mECUin1980 ,with theincrease
heavily concentrated infirst priority programmes .
Thebudgetary allocation of30mECUwasaugmented bytransfers
from agriculture andtextiles andrefunds but thetotal appropriations
of38mECUproved sufficient tomeet little more than half the
volume ofprogrammes submitted infirst priority .
Although statistics ofmigration flows intheMember States for
1980 arenotyetavailable itseems unlikely that thetotal of
12million migrants intheCommunity changed significantly in1980 .
There areindications ofabalancing outbetween return flows
(returning migrants )andnewarrivals ,mainly duetomigrants being
joined inthehost country bymembers oftheir families anda
certain influx ofrefugees from third countries .There hasalso
been afurther increase inthesecond generation migrant population .
Selection criteria andgeneral characteristics ofapplications
Three types ofaction areeligible under Council Decision 77/803/EEC :
-integrated programmes ,defined asmeasures necessary toensure
theeffectiveness andcontinuity ofaction throughout successive
phases ofmigration ,andlimited tomigrants moving from one
Community country toanother ;
-integration measures i.e. programmes toassist theintegration into
thesocial andworking environment which ,although notpart ofan
integrated programme /,facilitate thesocial andvocational
integration ofmigrant workers andtheir families ,andarenot
limited tomigration within theCommunity ;
(1)OJNoL 337of17.12.1977 ,p.12.

-24-
and
-thetraining ofteachers andwelfare workers .
TheGuidelines awarded priority tothefirst andthird ofthese ,
provided that inthecase ofintegrated prograinmes they covered
atleast twophases ofthemigrating process .
Under theheading ofintegration measures ,first priority was
given tolanguage training ortuition with alinguistic bias
foradults anddemonstration projects designed toimprove the
guality ofteaching adapted tothespecial needs ofthe
children ofmigrant workers .
Integrated programmes
Integrated programmes were submitted mostly byItaly andGermany
but asinprevious years there was asmall Irish programme to
assist thereturn ofemigrants totake upemployment inkey
skills athome . This kind ofaction was also featured insome
Italian programmes butmost oftheactivity concerned social and
vocational integration into 'the newcountry .TheGerman
programmes were tofacilitate theintegration ofmigrants from
Italy .Educational assistance forchildren -freguently combining
themaintenance ofmother tongue with theacguisition ofthenew
language -accounted for asubstantial part oftheGerman and
Italian integrated programmes ;other actions included adult
language tuition ,vocational training ,andinformation and
counselling services .
Aid was ,forexample ,approved for abicultural project inthe
Cologne area ,enabling students toobtain both theGerman
Hauptschule certificate andtheItalian licenza media .Another
approved project included special boarding school courses setup
byaprivate Italian body tofacilitate there-integration of
returning children into theItalian school system .
Integrated programmes amounted to21mECUin1980 or 33%
oftotal first priority applications .

-25-
Most programmes submitted asfirst priority integration measures
were either language courses inthetraditional sense or
vocational training courses with astrong linguistic bias and
aimed particularly attheyounger migrants ofthesecond and
sometimes third generation .
Forexample ,aproject run inaBrussels school ,based ona
pilot scheme aided bytheFund ,combined schooling andvocational
preparation with language training formaladjusted young migrants
togive them thenecessary qualifications andpsychological
stability foraccess tonormal training courses and jobs .
Inorder tohelp promoters inlearning from each other ,the
Commission organized ameeting inOctober 1980 inMarseilles
between theorganisers ofthis project and aFrench
promoter tocompare similar problems andmethods ofsurmounting
them .
Integration measures classified asfirst priority in1980 amounted
to63mECU .
First priority was also accorded tothebasic andadvanced
training ofteachers andwelfare workers whether connected with
integrated programmes orintegration measures .Special
complementary teacher training programmes were submitted from
anumber ofMember States ,allofwhich concerned teachers from
themigrants' country oforigin .Similarly ,alarge number of
thesocial workers intheschemes which qualified forapproval
were from thecountry oforigin .
Programmes approved inthis category amounted to1mECU .
Applications consisting ofdemonstration projects designed to
improve theadaptation ofchildren totheeducational system
ofthehost country were few ,amounting to0.2mECU .

-26-
Aninteresting French project provided special schooling and
integration formigrants ofdifferent origin especially
refugees from south-east Asia ,stressing importance ofcontact
with French children and families .
Beneficiaries
Itisestimated that operations approved in1980 will contribute
totheeducation ofsome 90,000 children ofmigrant workers ,to
courses adapted tothelinguistic andprofessional needs ofover
175,000 adults andyoung people and tothetraining ofmore than
2.500 teachers and welfare workers .

-27-
4.YOUNG PEOPLE
Volume ofapplications andbudgetary allocation
Thevolume ofapplications under Council Decision EEC/75/495"' "
forSocial Fund assistance foryoung persons reached 598mECU
in1980 ,a18%increase over theprevious year .Ofthis ,
466mECUwasfortraining programmes and132mECUfor
employment promotion under Council Regulation EEC/3039/78^.
Thebudgetary allocation of358mECU (250mECUfortraining
and108mECUforemployment aids )wasaugmented byrefunds of
34.8 mECUtobring total available appropriations inthis field
toalevel of19%above theprevious year .Funds available to
assist employment programmes designed tocounteract theserious
youth unemployment situation increased byover 50%over the
^previous year while appropriations fortraining aids were 15%
upon1979 .
General characteristics ofapplications and selection criteria
Programmes qualified forpriority only where they related to
first-job seekers andwere carried outeither inthefive absolute
priority regions orinother parts oftheCommunity shown by
Community labour force statistics tohave youth unemployment rates
above national orCommunity average -^. Thefollowing were exempt
from some orall ofthese conditions :
(a)theprogrammes forthetraining ofyoung women forjobs inwhich
women areunder -represented orjobs innewfields ofemployment
open toboth sexes ;
(b)special employment aids programmes forfirst -jobseekers in
urban zones with high rates ofyouth unemployment .
Allcourses accepted forapriority hadtofittheindividual needs
oftheunemployed young people concerned ,andhadtobebacked upby
active liaison with therelevant manpower services .
^XJNo199of30.7.1975 ,p.36;&JNo337of27.12.1977 ,p.10.
OJNbL361of23.12.1978 ,p.3.
Seelist published inOJNoC159of26.6.1979 ,page 7.

-28-
Traming programmes
First priority wasaccorded to:
-vocational preparation (general work preparation including
vocational guidance ,orinitial training forsemi-skilled
occupations )forthose under 20years ofage ;
-skilled training orretraining intheabsolute priority regions ;
-retraining programmes foryoung people (excluding graduates )
unemployed formore than sixmonths ;
-equality courses foryoung women asmentioned at (a)onthe
preceding page .
Thetypes ofprogramme submitted didnotdiffer greatly from those
ofprevious years ,thus marking adegree ofcontinuity inthe
approach tocombatting youth unemployment especially among those
without training whoaccount formost ofthelong-term unemployed .
This continuity ofapproach isalso influenced bytheCommission 's
selection criteria .There was ,however ,amarked increase inthe
youth opportunities programme submitted by -theUnited Kingdom which
covered 75%more people than intheprevious year .Applications
from Ireland also increased andwere geared towards theshortage
ofskilled workers intheconstruction ,civil engineering ,and
electrical andmechanical engineering sectors .
Themost striking development concerned applications forthetraining
ofyoung women for jobs inwhich they have been under-represented
which increased enormously in1980 extending to11,000 trainees ,11tines
greater than theprevious year .AsinSection (v)(Women )this
increase wasmade uplargely ofGerman programmes andthejobs
envisaged included thetraining ofwomen asturners ,blacksmiths ,
mechanics and electricians .
Programmes classifed asfirst priority amounted to215.3 mECU .
Second priority wasaccorded toskilled training following
*
vocational preparation approved asfirst priority and ,to
skilled training foryoung people under contract toemployers .
Inboth cases ,subsequent placement hadtobeassured .

-29-
Applications classified assecond priority in1980 amounted to
71 mECUwhich slightly exceeded remaining appropriations and
required ,therefore ,aweighted reduction of4.24 mECU .
Employment aids
Theregulations ^provided fortwotypes ofaid :forjob
creation onprojects meeting public needs which accounted for
one-fifth oftheapplications (measured according tothenumber
ofpersons covered bytheschemes );andfortherecruitment
ofadditional young people byemployers which concerned the
remaining four-fifths .Thelargest volume ofapplications forboth
types ofaidwas presented byItaly .Most applications from
France andIreland concerned recruitment aids while Denmark ,
Germany ,Italy ,theNetherlands and theU.K. concentrated onaids
topromote thecreation ofemployment through projects meeting
public needs .
First priority wasprescribed forrecruitment aids toemployment
with askill content andleading topermanent jobs inthefive
absolute priority regions .Programmes qualifying forthis
classification amounted to18mECUor16%ofthetotal
resources foremployment aids .
Second priority were accorded tospecific programmes ofthesame
type intheregions ofhigh youth unemployment published bythe
Commission orinurban areas with apopulation ofover 150,000
with ayouth unemployment rate ofatleast 15% .
Programmes classified assecond priority amounted to16.5 mECU .
^NoL361of23.12.1978 ,p.3.
Seelist published inOJNoC159of26.9.1979 .

-30-
Third priority wasgiven togeneral programmes intheregions
ofhigh youth unemployment .Special provision wasalso made
foraidonaone-off basis tohelp newprogrammes aimed at
filling gaps inexisting training structures .
Inpractice most programmes submitted under this priority
level were ofthefirst-mentioned type ,butunder thesecond
two U.K. programmes involving 37,000 young people inWales
received allocations totalling 14mECU .The total volume
ofprogrammes classified asthird priority came tojust over
75.5 mECU ,andsufficient appropriations remained toapprove
them without reduction .
Commission' sreport
TheCommission hasmade aseparate report ontheimpact of
Social Fund employment aids foryoung persons . This report
states that definitive conclusions cannot bedrawn atthis
relatively early stage ofimplementation ofthenewaids but
remarks that thehigher rates ofunemployment experienced by
young women arenotreflected inthedistribution ofbeneficiaries
asbetween thesexes inprogrammes submitted totheSocial Fund .
Thereport stresses theneed for asuitable training content
and thefact that thereal test ofthis iswhether employment
ismaintained after theexpiry oftheperiod ofaid .The
Commission draws attention ,moreover ,totheneed toincrease
theupper limit of30mECU totake account ofinflation and
expresses itsintention tomake aproposal inthis regard .
Beneficiaries
Itisestimated that applications approved in1980 will help to
train 389,000 young persons andcreate jobs forsome 266,000 .
Doc .COM (81)1Final of15January 1981 .

-31-
5.WOMEN
Volume ofapplications andbudgetary allocation
Thevolume ofapplications in1980 ,thethird year ofoperation of
thenewfield ofintervention forwomen provided forbyCouncil
Decision 77/804/EEc\reached 71mECU (compared to31mECUinl979 )
amounting to about three and ahalf times the total available
appropriations made upofabudget of20mECUandrefunds of
1.14 mECU .This increased volume ofapplications ispartly
attributable totheCommission 'spromotional work andinformation
activity tostimulate applications andcontrasts sharply with the
situation attheendofthefirst guarter of1979 when thedemand
was falling well short ofthebudgetary allocation .
Butalthough theoverall volume ofapplications isobviously no
longer acause forconcern ,theCommission must again express
disappointment attheunevenness oftheresponse asbetween
Member States .Once again Germany provided over 60%ofapplications
with projects ofsignificant volume coming only from France and
Italy among theother Member States .Theresult was that German
programmes made uptwo-thirds ofaidapproved andwith the
other twoMember States mentioned ,accounted forjust over 95%of
total appropriations .
Selection criteria andgeneral characteristics ofapplications
First priority wasaccorded tooperations designed towiden the
range ofjobs available toworren andpromote amore even mix ofjob
opportunities onthelabour market ,through training programmes
toimprove theintegration ofwomen into newoccupations filled by
both sexes orjobs where women areunder-represented .Theobjective
istoprovide practical support andincentive towards theCommunity
objective ofachieving eguality forwomen intraining andemployment .
Despite thedifficult economic situation there hasbeen asignificant
rise inthevolume ofprogrammes ofthis kind from 0.5mECUin1978 to
6.6mECUin1979 and14mECUin19802.
OJNoL337of27.12.1977 ,p.14.
? .. . , .The1981 figure isestimated tocontinue this trend .

-32-
Thelargest German application ,submitted bytheBundesanstalt fur
Arbeit ,covered arange ofprogrammes organised through their
local offices inseveral Lander inconjunction with training centres .
Ofthese about 12% came within thefirst priority category .
Atypical example ^runinconjunction with atraining centre in
Stuttgart ^trained women forcabinet-making andengineering .The
organisers overcame initial resistance totheemployment of
female cabinet-makers tothe extent that this has now come tobe
regarded asnormal inthearea ;thecentre isnowworking onthe
same approach inregard tocarservicing andrepair .
French applications infirst priority ,which showed asubstantial
increase over theprevious year ,concerned programmes smaller inscale
runmainly byChambers ofCommerce andprivate training bodies .One
interesting programme ,byaprivate body ,which hasbeen extended to
several French regions andhasinfluenced programmes inanother Member State ,
starts with aphase ofconfidence-building andisfollowed byin-firm
training"' ". Thepromoters maintain close contact with local
firms and training organisations toovercome traditional prejudices .
The Italian programmes ,also upontheprevious year ,concerned
projects runbytheregional authorities ,semi-state bodies and
private organisations .Programmes intheMezzogiorno ,which were
more numerous than inprevious years ,tended tobebased onlocal
newemployment initiatives such asthecreation ofcooperatives -a
growing tendency inmany sections oftheFund .
Theconditions ofeligibility require ,inaddition tothe
training content ,aninitial phase providing preparation
forworking life ormotivation fornew jobchoices and
measures tofacilitate entry into occupations offering good
jobprospects .

-33-
Craft trades like cabinet-making ,carpentry ,painting and
decorating ,tiling andupholstery frequently figure inthe
applications submitted generally under first priority .Other
skills provided forwere maintenance mechanic ,electrician ,welding ,
turning andprinting .Administrative andmanagement were
also included .Thenew jobs were mostly intheelectronics
sector andincomputer programming .
Applications classified infirst priority amounted to13.86 mECU .
Second priority wasaccorded toprogrammes preparing forjobs
traditionally occupied bywomen provided they either concerned
women victims ofmass dismissals orprovided training holding out
employment prospects atahigher level than thejobs previously
held .
TOdate noapplication hasbeen received under thefirst ofthese
headings ,while applications coming within thesecond category
amounted to54.9 mECU .With funds remaining after first priority
applications amounting toonly 7.09 mECU ,aweighted reduction of
about 87%hadtobeapplied tosecond priority applications .
Beneficiaries
Applications approved in1980 areestimated tobenefit about 11,300
women ofwhom about two-thirds were trained for jobs inwhich
women areunder -represented .
Asnoted inSection (iv)above ,programmes approved under .Youna
Persons forthetraining ofwomen under 25forjobs inwhich

-34-
they areunder -represented ormnewoccupations open toboth sexes
amounted to26.24 mECU .
Women are ,ofcourse ,eligible onanequal basis with men
for the other fields ofintervention ofthe Social Fund and
figures supplied byMember States suggest that just over 30%
ofall Social Fund beneficiaries are women .

-35-
6REGIONS
Volume ofapplications andbudgetary allocations
Thevolume ofapplications submitted for Social Fund aid for
programmes concerning workers inless-developed ordeclining
regions under Article 5ofCouncil Decision 71/66/EEc' "
amounted tonearly 600mECU in1980 ,a12%increase on1979 .
Theaggregate provision for thefields ofregions ,technical
2progress andgroups offirms combined forbudgetary purposes
was 395mECUcompared with 326mECU in1979 ,anincrease of
more than 21% .Asinprevious years ,90%ofthecombined
budgetary provision (i.e. 355.50 mECU )wasdevoted toprogrammes under
Article 5(la)(Region ^oftheabove Decision .When account istaken ofrefunds
from 1979 .considerably higher than intheprevious year ,thetotal volume of
appropriations available forcommitment under Article 5(Régions )
in1980 was 455mECUcompared to354mECU in1979 ,showing a
28.5% increase .Therelative shortage offunds tomeet eligible
applications was ,therefore ,less severe than intheprevious
year .Programmes classified inthefirst four priority levels
were ,asin1979 ,fully financed while theremaining balance for
fifth priority applications amounted to34%ofeligible
applications ascompared with 22%intheprevious year .
Ingeneral terms ,thenature ofapplications didnotvary
significantly from 1979 .
Thestability resulting from thecontinuation ofthemain criteria
ofselection foranumber ofyears facilitated themanagement of
this section oftheFund particularly .Newprogrammes submitted
usually conformed totheselection criteria andaspromoters have
Decome more familiar with thecontent ofthecriteria ,they were ina
better position topredict thelikely outcome oftheir applications .
Selection criteria and characteristics ofapplicants
Five levels ofpriority applied ,described indetail intheGuidelines
OJNoL28of4.2.1971 ,p.15;OJNoL337of27.12.1971 ,p.8.
2In1981 separate budgetary allocations were introduced .

-36-
fortheManagement ofthe Fund fortheperiod 1980-82 .
First level priority was accorded toschemes inthefive absolute
priority regions (Greenland ,French Overseas Departments ,Ireland ,
Northern Ireland andtheMezzogiorno )forjobcreation ;
resettlement with guaranteed employment ;basic andvocational
training forpersons suffering orthreatened with unemployment or
under-employment ;andtraining forhigher skills .
There was agrowth inthevolume ofprogrammes submitted for the
absolute priority areas largely due toincreased applications from
Ireland ,up40%over theprevious year ,where there wasanincrease
inapplications coming from theIrish Industrial Training
Authority (AnCo )andtheIndustrial Development Authority (IDA).
Training programmes were runbyAnCo foranumber
oftrades inspecialised training centres (woodworking ,metalworking ,
tailoring ,etc .)andbytheIDAtoprepare unemployed persons for
jobs innewindustries (manufacturing andservices ).
Programmes classified asfirst priority increased to228mECU ,
ascompared with 207mECUintheprevious year .Because ,
however ,theavailability ofamuch greater volume ofrefunds
increased total resources inthis field ofintervention tothe
benefit offifth priority applications ,grants totheabsolute
priority regions accounted ,at54% ,foraslightly smaller
proportion ofthetotal than intheprevious year (62% ).
Social Fund aidinthese regions assists ahigh proportion of
training activity bypublic authorities .Because jobguarantees
arenot ageneral requirement atthis level ofpriority ,the
extent towhich training leads tojobs isnotalways evident .
There has ,however ,been agrowth inprogrammes relating to
enterprises reflected especially inapplications from Ireland ,
Northern Ireland andtheMezzogiorno inwhich cases jobplacement and
improvement intraining standards areusually more evident .The

-37-
setting upofthe "Fondo diRotazione "inItaly under theframework
law ,1980 ,hasfacilitated thefinancing ofjoint state /private
programmes attherequest ofenterprises and i§inmany cases ,carried
out incooperation with public training centres .This new
development isanexample where resources have successfully contributed
towards both employment creation andraising training levels .
Aconsiderable volume ofaid has been allocated tothe absolute
priority regions inrecent years andhascontributed toalarge
proportion oftotal public expenditure ontraining inthose regions .
TheCommission attaches agreat deal ofimportance tothehigh
concentration ofaid inthese regions inrecent years and is
carrying out astudy ontheimpact ofFund aid inthose regions .
Second priority operations related toother areas eligible forERDF
aidwith serious restructuring problems covered byCommunity policies."' "
Operations included were thetraining andresettlement ofunemployed
workers orthose threatened with unemployment where jobguarantees
exist .
Second priority operations accounted for 7.49 mECUandoperations
relating tosteel reconversion were approved foroperations inFrance
andthe UK.Anumber ofnewandsuccessful programmes leading
directly toemployment were carried out .Forexample ,aFrench
programme provided retraining forheavy work workers insmall andmedium -
sized sub-contracting firms inthesteel sector ,foremployment in
micro-chip technology intheaeronautical industry .Another
programme runbyasubsidiary ofBritish Steel ,looked into alternative
employment andinvestment outlets inareas affected bytheclosure of
steel plants ,andprovided training forunemployed workers inpriority
regions ,especially inWales and N.England .
Third priority programmes ,providing fortraining with guaranteed
employment intheremaining ERDF regions accounted for100.36 mECU .
Incertain regions Fund aid for small andmedium-sized firms often
contributed towards theevolution ofregional employment policy
objectives andthediversification oftheeconomic and industrial base .
Special mention wasnade oftheserious restructuration problems
faced bythesteel industry .

-38-
Inother Member States ,especially theU.K. ,aidforprogrammes
under this heading wasgiven foroperations forming part ofnational
programmes forpriority regions .
Fourth priority programmes ,covered basic preparatory training
courses forpersons with insufficient knowledge tofollow regular
courses and jobcreation forpersons either unemployed forlonger
than sixmonths orinfirms employing less than 25people .
These programmes ,accounting for33.04 mECU ,showed asignificant
development in1980 ,rising from 27mECUin1979 .This ismainly
attributable tothebasic preparatory training courses provided
forcandidates who lacked theessential minimum entry reguirements
forregular training courses because they never possessed or
have nothadtheopportunity tomaintain basic knowledge and
skills .TheCommission will continue toencourage these
courses which experience hasshown areincreasingly necessary
with rising unemployment .Significant operations were carried
outinboth declining areas atLiege andCharleroi inBelgium ,
andinMerseyside intheUK,aswell asrural regions of
Normandy ,Brittany andtheregions oftheLoire inFrance ,which
hadcorresponding courses .Applications forbasic preparatory
courses in1980 amounted to31.4 mECU .
Thevolume ofapplications foraidtopromote employment for
thelong-term unemployed orthose recruited bysmall enterprises -
commonly known asaidE^"wassignificantly downon1979 ,falling
from 26mECUin1979 to15.3mECU2in1980 .U.K. applications were
reduced to9.5mECUascompared with 14mECUin1979 following the
withdrawal oftheSmall Firms' Employment Subsidy (SFES )scheme .
Applications were also received from Italy andGermany .
Exceptional cases
Special provision wasmade inthe1980 Guidelines ,inexceptional
circumstances under aspecial United category ,forassistance
fortheinitial stages ofprogrammes foradaptation tolabour
market needs oflocal training structures faced with training
"^AidEprovides foraids toemployers based on30%ofthegross
wage costs ofnewly recruited workers foraninitial period not
exceeding sixmonths .
2i.e. total forAidEatallpriority levels .

-39-
demands beyond their capacities .Grants totalling 620,929 ECU
were provided forprogrammes carried outinboth rural and
industrial areas ,asfound intheArdechois plateau and
StEtienne respectively .
These programmes ,together with other activities financed by
theSocial Fund ,especially inthepilot projects field ,point
tothepotential for further development ofwork inthis area .
Fifth priority programmes were applied toother operations in
theERDF regions forthetraining oftheunemployed andjob
creation .Eligible applications amounted to203mECU
against remaining appropriations of68.80 mECU .These
applications were again subject totheweighted reduction
procedure ,which inconsultation with Member States ,was
mainly applied tolarge programmes ofanational character .
Alimited number ofprogrammes ofamodest size that didnot
fully satisfy requirements ofguaranteed employment ,butwhich
seemed tobewell integrated inregional plans ,were fully
financed .
TheCommission wasglad tobeable tofinance notonly all
applications inthesecond ,third andfourth priorities ,but
also ahigher proportion oftraditional public authority
training schemes infifth priority .
Beneficiaries
Itisestimated that 488,000 persons benefitted from
programmes agreed in1980 .

-40-
7.TECHNICAL PROGRESS ANDGROUPS OFFIRMS
Volume ofapplications andbudgetary allocations
These fields ofintervention provided forunder Article 5(lb)and5(lc )
ofCouncil Decision 71/66/EEC ,aredesigned to:
-Safeguard andpromote employment insectors undergoing technical
progress resulting insubstantial changes inmanpower and
vocational knowledge andskills ;and
-retrain persons employed ingroups offirms forced tocease ,
reduce ortransform their activities permanently asaresult
ofsubstantial changes inproduction ordistribution .
Anotional budgetary allocation of39.55 mECU ,equivalent to10%
ofthetotal provision forregions ,technical progress andgroups
offirms wasplanned forthese twofields ofintervention .The
volume ofapplications ,however ,though double that oftheprevious
year ,reached only 26.72 mECU .Theincrease inapplications is
areflection notonly ofthedifficulties faced byfirms inthe
present economic situation ,butalso ofthegreater degree of
adaptability intheMember States inmounting programmes eligible
forthishitherto under -used section oftheFund ^".Themajority
ofapplications under Technical Progress were submitted -from Italy ,
Germany andFrance .
Selection guidelines andgeneral characteristics ofapplicants
Technical progress
First priority wasaccorded toprogrammes providing training in
sectors threatened with unemployment duetotechnical developments .
Anumber ofprogrammes were submitted from Germany fortraining inthedata
processing industry ,andfrom France andtheNetherlands intheprinting industry .
Other programmes concerned quartz clockmaking andaquaculture inFrance
andshipbuilding andsteel andenergy production inGermany .
1
The1981 volume ofapplications isexpected toshow another
substantial increase .

-41-
Second priority was accorded toprogrammes formodernisation of
production methods andmanagement insmall andmedium-sized firms .
Most applications came within this priority level .Training was
orientated towards management ,marketing andnewproduction
techniques ,andwasundertaken both intraining centres and
within enterprises .Interesting Italian programmes were
carried outinthenewenergy ,electronic (musical instruments ),
thewoodworking andshoe sectors .Anovel French application
provided training forthecreation ofsmall businesses in
France . ABritish application concerned thewoodworking
sector .
Third priority wasaccorded tooperations involving ,forthefirst
time inaMember State ,theintroduction ofnew technology capable of
being ofbenefit tothewhole ofasector .Twoprogrammes were
submitted from Italy .The first introduced theuseofacentral
computer system andtheuseofrobots intheproduction ofmotor
cars ,benefiting 314people .Thesecond programme ,involved the
training of900persons fortheintroduction ofelectronics inthe
central telephone system .
Fourth priority was forprogrammes involving training innew
skills orthose inshort supply for thedevelopment ofnew
technology .Programmes were submitted fortheimprovement ofskills
inthenuclear energy sector inGermany andsolar energy inItaly
along with aFrench application involving thetraining of
specialists forthegeophysical exploration ofoilandminerals .
There wasconsiderable doubt during theyear astotheextent to
which approval could bemade forapplications outside theERDF
regions because oftheapplication ofArticle 9(2 )ofCouncil
Decision 71/66/EEC^.Sufficient appropriations became available ,
however ,asaresult ofrefunds ,tomeet infull allapplications ,
amounting to24.5 mECU ,fulfilling priority conditions .The
inevitable delay inestablishing this situation does ,however ,
seem tohave ledtothepostponement ofsane programmes .
Fordetailed explanation seepage 13.

-42-
Beneficiaries
The total number ofbeneficiaries under technical progress is
estimated at16,586 persons .
Groups offirms
Priority wasaccorded tooperations concerned with training redundant
workers insectors affected bystructural change for jobs inother
sectors .Such apolications numbered four ,andamounted to2.65 mECU ,
double thevolume oftheprevious year ,benefiting about 2,800
persons .Thenewapplications concerned aBritish programme
fortheretraining offishermen inthelight ofchanges
innational fishing zones andanItalian programme providing
retraining of340persons inscattered small andmedium-sized
enterprises insectors experiencing difficulty (e.g. shoes ,
food ,electro-mechanical )inLombardy .

-43-
8.THE HANDICAPPED
Volume ofapplications andbudgetary allocation
The total volume ofapplications concerning thereintegration ofthe
disabled into working life under Art .5(Id)ofCouncil Decision 71/66/EEC
amounted to127mECU ascompared with abudgetary allocation
of74mECU .Refunds amounted to4mECUbringing to 78mECU
thetotal appropriations available forcommitment in1980 .
Selection criteria andgeneral characteristics ofapplications
Asinprevious years thelargest applications were submitted by
public authorities responsible forpreparing thedisabled for
re-entry into employment but these were complemented bytheprivate
bodies ,often private organisations whose programmes though small
inscale showed much originality ofapproach and ahigh sense of
dedication .
First priority wasaccorded torehabilitation andtraining inthe
five absolute priority regions aswell asdemonstration projects ,
regardless oflocation ,designed toexperiment newapproaches and
techniques .
Most oftheapplications came within theformer category andmany
ranged over thewhole integration process from functional rehabilitation
tovocational training andincluded thetraining ofinstructors .
Nine newdemonstration projects ,representing 13.5 mECUwere
approved in1980 .AGerman application grouped under the Ministry of
Labour andSocial Affairs five experiments indifferent centres each
dealing with aseparate aspect oftraining andemployment ofthe
disabled .AFrench application featured thedevelopment ofa
modular approach totraining while Italian projects concerned
theupgrading ofdisabled workers atpresent employed below their
capacities .

-44-
Total first priority applications amounted to34mECUandwere
approved without reduction .Asexplained onpage 13,the
application ofArticle 9(2 )ofCouncil Decision 71/66/EECmeant that
only 4mECUofthehandicapped budget could becommitted outside
theterritory oftheEuropean Regional Development Fund (ERDF ).
Because ,however ,availability ofrefunds from previous years
referred toabove ,itproved possible toapprove infull all the
demonstration projects submitted .
Second priority wasaccorded tovocational training ,jobadaptation ,
(premises andequipment )andaids topromote employment intherest
oftheCommunity ,butbecause ofthebudgetary regulation referred to
above ,only programmes within theterritory oftheERDF could be
approved .Most ofthese programmes consisted ofvocational training
with aids toemployment and jobadjustment accounting fornotmore
than 10% .
Thevolume ofprogrammes approved insecond priority was 44mECU ,with
theremaining balance of0.8m ECUbeing transferred totheregions field .
Beneficiaries
Approximately 57,500 persons benefitted from training approved under
this heading in1980 .

-45-
V.PILOT SCHEMES AND PREPARATORY STUDIES
1.Interest instudies andpilot schemes wasmaintained in
1980 -46applications were approved foratotal of2.96 mECU .
2.Asmall proportion ofthebudget of3mECUwasallocated
toprojects concerned with thepreparation oranalysis oftheFund 's
interventions .Oneconcerned training measures coming within the
scope ofassistance from theFund inthevarious fields of
intervention inthefive absolute priority regions (French
Overseas Departments ,Greenland ,Ireland ,Northern Ireland ,
Mezzogiorno ).
Theaimoftheother istoevaluate twostudies andeight pilot
schemes carried out with financial assistance from the Fund in
the sector ofsmall and medium-sized firms .
Aspart ofthis process ,theCommission organized atwo-day
meeting ofpromoters ofsuch studies andschemes inGrenoble
(France )inDecember 1980 .Thediscussions ,which ranged over
theorigins ,aims ,methods andmeans used andresults obtained
enabled progress tobemade intackling problems concerned with
management training andjobcreation insmall andmedium-sized
firms .
3.Annex XVgives alist ofstudies andschemes approved in
1980 ,broken down byfield ofintervention andindicating
thenature ofthestudy orscheme ,thename ofthepromoter
and theamount approved .
Thebasic aspects ofthestudies andpilot schemes approved
in1980 maybesummarised asfollows :

-46-
(a)Asfarasmigrant workers were concerned ,theschemes
andstudies involved vocational andlanguage training
with aview toeventual return tothecountry oforigin ,
and theintroduction ofteachers toanewpattern of
inter -cultural teaching .
(b)Thetwomain aims ofschemes foryoung people were concerned
with guidance forspecially disadvantaged young people and
their integration injobs and insociety ingeneral and
thespecialized training oftechnicians intrades where
jobprospects were good .
(c)Asregards women ,tworelated pilot schemes were aimed
atimproving theemployment situation ofwomen whohave
ajobbut noprospect ofcareer advancement within their
firm .Oneofthese ,carried outbytheBureau desTemps
Elementaires ,isbeing conducted jointly inLyon (France )
andMilan (Italy ). Theother ,organised bytheCommission
duTravail desFemmes intheBelgian Ministry ofLabour
andEmployment ,isbeing conducted inafirm and inan
insurance company .
Theother pilot schemes aimed toprovide training forthe
creation offirms and jobs inacooperative oronbehalf of
theCommunity .
(d)Asregards handicapped persons ,onestudy wasconcerned with
thedevelopment ofvocational guidance services
(Germany )andanother with asearch forthebest
ways ofreintegrating handicapped persons into jobs and
society bearing inmind changes inattitudes andintheeconomic
and social situation inFrance .
Theaimofanother pilot scheme was todevelop anappropriate
modular training programme forcraftsmen inthesurgical
footwear industry intheUnited Kingdom .

-47-
(e)Asregards regions ,theaimoftheschemes approved was
toprovide training forthecreation ofemployment
opportunities tomeet special needs such asthose ofpoor
inner city areas andless-favoured rural areas (United Kingdom ).
(f)Finally ,programmes were implemented inthefield oftechnical
progress with theaimofpromoting theuseofnewtechnologies
inteaching .
4.TheCommission regularly organises seminars for thepurpose of
assessing andpromoting wider information andpossible follow-up
ongroups ofprojects onrelated subjects assisted bytheFund .
Themeeting referred toabove (page 45)wasconcerned with studies
andpilot schemes relating tosmall andmedium-sized firms .The
main points resulting from themeeting aresummarised below :
(a)Those inthefirst category concerned young people looking for
employment .Insome cases ,itwas aquestion ofhow to
integrate them into experimental production units taking into
account technological innovation andsocial change .In
another ,assistance wasgiven topeople conducting individual
projects relating tothecreation ofjobs .
Theresults ofstudies were evaluated inthelight oftheir
degree ofacceptance byinstitutions ,firms andpublic
authorities while pilot schemes were assessed onthebasis
oftheactual number ofjobs created and thepossibilities
oftransferability ofthemethods used .
(b)Thestudies andschemes inthesecond category were for
young people and adults with aminimum ofemployment
experience .Theresults ofthese studies andpilot schemes
were examined inthelight ofthesubsequent situation of
firms whose managers orsupervisory staff were trained and ,
again ,thepossibilities oftransferring themethods
implemented .
Anexpert wasappointed bytheCommission todraw upareport
ontheresults ofthejoint evaluation ofstudies andpilot
schemes relating tothecreation ofjobs insmall and
medium-sized firms .

-48-
REGIONAL IMPACT OFTHE SOCIAL FUND
Asindicated inChapter IV(vi ),Social Fund grants approved
in1980 specifically forprogrammes intheregions eligible
forassistance from theEuropean Regional Development Fund
amounted to423mECU .With theaddition ofgrants approved
inother areas ofintervention ,thetotal Social Fund
assistance destined in1980 forthese regions was 825mECU ,
25%above thecorresponding figure intheprevious year .Of
this amount 334mECU ,nearly 14%upon1979 ,were allocated
tooperations inthefive absolute priority regions :Greenland ,
theFrench Overseas Departments ,Ireland ,Northern Ireland and
theMezzogiorno .
Inaccordance with the Commission 'sview that the Fund should
beused asaninstrument toaid the correction ofstructural
deficits ,these regions ,especially those ofabsolute priority ,
have been maintained ataconsistently high level ofFund aid
inrecent years .This hasbeen achieved inthecase ofthe
absolute priority regions partly through thehigher rate of
intervention^and partly through theprominence given tothese
regions intheselection criteria .The31%increase inthe
total volume ofcommitments made in1980 ascompared with the
previous year helped toreduce theimpact oftheweighted
reduction tothebenefit ofprogrammes atlower priority
levels .Therefore ,although aid totheERDF regions increased
inabsolute terms in1980 itdeclined asaproportion oftotal
appropriations (Table I).
Theaverage aidpercapita inthefive absolute priority
regions increased from 33.96 ECUin1979 to42ECUin1980
(Table II). This compares with anaverage of10.2 ECUfor
theCommunity asawhole in1980 (7.16 ECUin1979 ).
Abreakdown byfield ofintervention foreach ofthefive
regions ofabsolute priority isgiven inAnnex vll .
Authorised byCouncil Regulation EECNo2895/77
OJNoL337of27.12.1977 ,p.7

-49-
Detailed information onother regions
Thepresent structure oftheFund does notfacilitate the
collection ofdetailed information regarding itsimpact on
individual regions apart from those ofabsolute priority .
This islargely because ahigh proportion ofaidisallocated
toprogrammes which arevery broad inscale (frequently
national orextending over several regions )andsoabreakdown
bybeneficiary regions isnotavailable .
TheCommission hasdecided tointroduce ,instages ,a
computerised system ofregionalised information inconnection
with allCommunity financial instruments intheframework
oftheCIRCE (European Communities Information and
Documentary Research Centre )system .Preliminary work on
this has started .

-50-
Table I
SUMMARY STATEMENT OFINTERVENTION APPROVED IN1980
(figures arebased oninformation provided bymember states )
Field of
interventionRegions ofabsolute
priorityOther ERDF
RegionsOther Community
RegionsTotal
mECU* % mECU*% mECU*% mECU
Persons leaving
AGRICULTURE 1.2 7.8 6.3 39.8 8.2 52.4 15.70
Persons working
inthe TEXTILE
and CLOTHING
INDUSTRY 1.8 9.9 8.1 43.6 8.6 46.5 18.50
MIGRANT
WORKERS 1.74 4.6 7.3 19.4 28.5 76 37.5
YOUNG PEOPLE 77.2 19.6 206.3 52.7 108.7 27.7 392.2
WOMEN 1.0 4.8 8.7 41.6 11.2 53.6 20.90
HANDICAPPED 21.4 27.6 49.4 63.6 6.9 8.8 77.7
REGIONS 228.2 53.8 L95.6 46.2 - - 423.8
TECHNICAL
PROGRESS 1.5 6.4 8.7 37.9 12.7 55.6 22.9
GROUPS OF
FIRMS- - 1.1 43.0 1.5 57.0 2.6
TOTAL 334.04 33.0 491.50 48.6 186.30 18.4 1,011.80
*ECUs based onDecember 1980 exchange rate .

-51-
Table II
COMMITMENTS 1980
Aid perregion perhead ofactive population
Region Active population ^"
('000 )Commitments
(mECU )Aidpercapita
(ECU )
NORTHERN
IRELAND 587 45.0 76.6
IRELAND 1,208 82.50 68.29
MEZZOGIORNO 5,875 172.79 29.41
ÍTKKKPJÍ .AND approx .25 5.7 228.0
FRENCH OVERSEAS
DEPARTMENTS 291 29.16 100.2
TOTAL 7,986 335.15 42.0
Source :ForNorthern Ireland ,Ireland andMezzogiorno :
Eurostat :"Labour Force Sample Survey -1979 "
(notyetpublished ).
Labour force byRegion (persons with amain
occupation +unemployed persons ).Figures for1979 .
ForGreenland :"Programmes -TheRegional development
programmes 17".Figures for1978 .
ForFrench Overseas Departments :"Statistical Yearbook
ofFrance -1978 ".Figures for1967 .

-52-
VII .COMMITTEE OFTHE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND
TheCommittee oftheEuropean Social Fund ,anadvisory body
made upofrepresentatives ofgovernments ,trade unions and
employers andsetupbytheTreaty ,continued togive
valuable assistance tothe Commission inits task of
management oftheFund .
TheCommittee met inplenary session three times during the
year toconsider
-twoseries ofapplications foraidfrom theFund ;
-thedraft guidelines established bytheCommission for the
management oftheEuropean Social Fund fortheperiod 1981-83 ;
-thedraft budget for 1981 ;
-proposal onassistance from theEuropean Social Fund to
provide income support forworkers intheshipbuilding
industry ;
-renewal ofdecisions under Council Decision 71/66/EEC (Textile /
Clothing ,Migrants ,Young People andWomen );
-proposal toextend thesystem ofhigher rate ofintervention
from theEuropean Social Fund toGreece (amendment of
Council Regulation (EEC )No2895/77).

-53-
ANNEXES

ANNEX I DEVELOPMENT OFTHE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION IN1980
1.Major economic variables 1974-1980
Average figures foreach year (thousands )andpercentage changes between years (1)
1974 " X '1975 X 19^6%
% 1077 % I973VI979 IX 1'K-O (1)
I.Civilian Erployment 103 .00«;
.... .-1.36 101 .607 ♦0.05 101.655 ♦0.35 102.007 ♦0.23 102.245 >0.70)02.960Lo.2103.166
II.Unemploynent 3.067 ♦50.3 4.612 +13.6 5.239 ♦9.3? 5.736♦4.17 5.973 ♦1.506.obo].12.1 6.805
III .C\νιIianworΚιog
populat ion (î♦II)106.074 ♦0.14 106.221 +0.64 106 .S96♦0.79 10".740 ♦0.44 108.217 ♦0.7210ÄOCCj»0.6109.972
IV.Inactive and others
(note 2)151.673 ♦0.31 152.137 -0.20 151.839 -0.26 151 .443 -α001 151/42 -0.14 151 .277-0.2 150.925
V.To:JLρ~P'j .<j:ion
(ín *¿57.747 +0.24 - 255.358 +0.15 258.735 ♦0.1 7259.1 S3 ♦0.13 25?.é59 •3.22 260.237 •0.2 263.897
VI.Cross Do ιcPro-
duct Cinde *)103-1.6 98.4 +5.0 103.3 ♦2.3 105.7 +3.1 '.09.0 ♦3.1 112.4 +1.3 113.9
VII .Ρrcduc t.ν11/per
worker (inde *)100 ♦1.3 101 +5.1 106.1 +1.9 10S .2 +2.7 111.1 ♦2.4 113.3 ♦1.1 115".1
VIII .Unemployment Rate
(11:1:1)2.9S 4.3* 4.9Z-· 5.3% j.5X 5.5% 6.2%
IX.Activity
Rate Overall
iir:V >
Vo^en41.27
54.4X
28.67 .41.U
54.12
28.87 .41.3%
54.1X
29.2".41.6 :
54.0X
29.«Χ;1.7X
53.9X
30.IX41.9%
>otavailable
lot ava ilable42.2%
η.a.
η.a.
I-
Notes :1.Source :Annual Economic Review 1980-81 (Commission oftheEuropean Communities )
2.Line IV:'Inactive andothers' includes thearmed services ,housewives ,students ,among other categories .
(1)1980 provisional figures .

-55-
ANNEX I
2.PROPORTION OFYOUNG PEOPLE UNDER 25AMONG TOTAL
REGISTERED UNEMPLOYED {%)
Situation atend ofOctober 1980
COUNTRY FEMALE MALE TOTAL
Belgium 41.8 40.6 41.4
Denmark 39.4 26.8 32.6
Germany (1) 29.9 24.1 27.3
France 52.9 38.4 46.4 .
Ireland 36.0 21.8 25.2
Italy 58.9 44.7 51.4
Luxembourg 62.8 41.7 53.3
Netherlands 64.5 37.2 47.2
United Kingdom 55.8 34.9 41.4
Community (EUR-9 ) 50.5 36.5 46.5
(1)Situation atendofSeptember .
Source :Eurostat "Bnployment andunemployment :rapid information "

-56-
ANNEX I
3.UNEMPLOYMENT RATES INTHE MEMBER STATES 1980
(in%)
1979 1980
W M Τ W M Τ
Belgium 14.5 5.2 8.7 15.7 5.7 9.4
Denmark 5.9 4.8 5.3 6.4 6.1 6.2
Germany 4.6 2.6 3.4 4.6 2.7 3.4
France 8.1 4.6 6.0 8.9 4.8 6.4
Ireland 6.1 8.0 7.4 7.1 8.8 8.3
Italy 9.8 6.3 7.5 10.8 6.5 8.0
Luxembourg 1.1 0.5 0.7 1.2 0.5 0.7
Netherlands 5.0 3.7 4.1 5.5 4.5 4.8
United Kingdom 4.2 6.1 5.3 5.5 7.8 6.9
Communi ty (EUR-9) 6.6 4.9 5.5 7.3 5.4 6.2
Source :Eurostat -Unemployment Monthly Bulletin .

ANNEXII'BUDGETARY RESOURCES ftWRTTAHT.FFOR1980
1.Appropriations forcommitmentavailablemECU
BudgetNomenclatureJApprops.entered
Iinthe1980budgetApprops.carried
overfrom1979Transferof
appropriations
(+or-)TOTAL
5000
5001Agriculture
TextilesI29,00 12,06 6,00 35,06
5010Youngpeople-training 250,00 30,04 ♦1,08 281,12
5011Youngpeople-employment 108,00 4,73 1,08 111,65
5020Handicapped persons- 0,08- 0,08
5030Migrantworkers 30,00 2,03 +6,00 38,03
5050 Women 20,00 1,14- 21,14
50• 437,00 50,08 0,00 487,08
5100Regions
5101Groupsoffirms 395,50 58,31 V0,80 454,61
5102Technicalprogress
5110Handicapped persons 74,00 3,98 0,80 77,18
5120Industrialconversion tokenentry - - tokenentry*
51 469,50 62,29 0,00 531,79
5200Pilotschemes 3,00 0,0543,05
50-52 TOTAL 909,50 112,42 0,00 1.021,92

ANNEX II
2.Appropriations forpayment available
mECU
Budget NomenclatureApprops .
entered inthe
1980 budgetAutomatic
carry-oversTransfer of
approps .
(+or-)Suppl emen tary
budget TOTAL
5000
5001Agriculture »)
Textiles ;15,00 38,00 -14,00 4,00 43,00
5010
5011
5020
5030
5050Young people -training
Young people -employment
Handicapped persons
Migrant workers
Women100,00
35,70
3,00
22,10
5,0034,06
23,64
0,17
11,26
10,00+·35,75
-21,00
- 0,7552,80
28,40
6,00222,61
66,74
2,42
33,36
21,00
5Û 180,80 117,13 0,00 91,20 389,13
51ÛQ
5101
5102
5'.10
5120Regions
Groups offirms ■
Technical progress
Handicapped persons
Industrial conversion167^50 .
25,009&,85
12,35
2,50-14,00
+16,50
- 2,50217,00
17,20469,35
71,05
51 192,50 113,70 0,00 234,20 540,40
5200 Pilot schemes 1,00 2/33- 1,00 4,33
50-52 TOTAL 374,30 233,16 0,00 326,40 933,86

ANNEX III
DESCRIPTION OFTHE UTTT.TSATTON OFBUDGETARY RESOURCES FOR 1980
1.Utilisation ofappropriations forcommitment
/
Budget NomenclatureTOTAL AVAILABLE ;
FOR 1980COMMITMENTS MADE
IN1980UTILISAT­
IONRATE
(*)APPROPS .FOR
COMMITMENT AVAILABL
ON31.12.1980
5C00
5C01Agriculture
Textiles35,06 34,22 97/6 0/84
501G Young people -training 281/12 281/09 99/9 0/03
5011 Young people -employment 111/65 111/64
•99/9 0/01
5C20 Handicapped persons 0/08- - 0/08
5030 Migrant workers 38/03 37/51 98,6 0/52
5050Women 21/14 20/96 99/1 0/18
50 487/08 485/42 99/6 1/66
5100 Regions ' ;
5101 Groups offirms !454,61 449,39 98/85,22
5102 Technical progress ;
5110 Handicapped persons 77/18 77/16 99/9 0/02
5120 Industrial conversion- - -
51 531/79 526/55 99/0 5/24
5200 Pilot schsnes 3/05 2/96 .96/9 0/09
50-52 TOTAL1.021/92 1.014/93<*1)99/3 6/99
(*1)Amount based onbudgetary situation on31.12.1980 .Inthefollowing tables ,theamounts
committed differ slightly from this figure because theconversion rate on31.12.1980 was
used inorder tomake thenecessary comparisons easier .

ANNEX III2.Utilisation ofappropriations forpayment
mECU
Approps .available Amounts paid 7. Appropriations Approps .avaifable
Budget Nomenclature for 1980 in1980 cancelled on31.12.1980
5C30 Agriculture | 43,00 41,29 96,02- 1,71
5C01 Textiles '
5010 Young people -Training222,61 200,23 89,95- 22,38
5011 Young people -Employment 66,74 45,16 67,67 21,58
5C20 Handicapped persons 2,42 2,42 99,96"■
0,11
5030 Migrant workers 33,36 33,25 99,68–
5C5Ü Women21,00 17,06 81,24 . 3,94
50 389,13 339,41 87,22- 49,72
5100 Regions144,42
5101 Groups offirms ·469,35 324,93 69,23
5102 Technical progress2,59
5110 Handicapped persons71,05 68,46 96,35'
5120 Industrial conversion–
51' ,
540,40 393,39 72,80- 147,01
5z:u Pilot schemes 4,33 2,38 54,97- 1,95
-SiD-52 TOTAL 933,86 735,18 (*1) 78,72- 198,68
(*1)Amount based onbudgetary situation on31.12.1980 .Inthefollowing tables ,theamounts
committed differ slightly from this figure because theconversion rate on31.12.1980
wasused inorder tomake necessary comparisons easier .

3.Utilisation ofappropriations forpayment
Breakdown byappropriations forpayment fortheyear andappropriations carried over
mECU
Budget NomenclatureApprops for
payment
provided for
LntheBudgetApprops for
payment avail -
able for 1980
(*)PaymentsUtilisation ofappropriations carried
over from 1979
made carried over cancelled Original
amountFinal
amount (*)Paid Cancelled
ibsolute %absolute·/
/· absolut !X ibsolute %absolute X
5000
5001
5010
5011
5020
5030
5030Agriculture j
Textiles
Young people -Trainine
Young people -Employmer
Handicapped persons
Migrant workers
Women15,00
100,00
t35,70
3,00
22,10
5,005,00
188,55
«3,10
2,25
22,10
11,003,29
166,17
21,52
2,25
21,09
7,06f
88.1
49,9
100,0
95,4
64.21-71
22,38
21,58
0,11
3,9411,9
50,1
4,6
35,8-
-18,0Q
34,06
23,64
0,17
11,26
10,0038,00
34,06
23,64
0,17
11,26
10,0038,00
34,06
23,64
0,17
11,26
10,00100
100
100
100
100
iob-
-
50 180,80 272,00 222,28 81,7 49,72 18,3- -117,13 117,13 117,13 100- -
•100
5101
5102
5110
5120Regions
Groups offirms
Technical progress
Handicapped persons
Industrial conversion167,50
25,00370,50
56,20226,08
53,6161,0
95,4144,42
2,59 ^39,0
- -98,85
12,35
2,5098,85
14,8598,85
14,85100
100- -
51 192,50 426,70 279,69 65,6 147,01 34,4- -113,70 113,70 113,70 100- -
5230 Pilot schemes 1,00 2,00 0,05 2,5 1,95 97,5- - 2,33 2,33 2/33 100- -
50-52 TOTAL 374,30 700,70 502,02 71,7 198,68 28,3- -233,16 233,16 233,16 100- -
(*)Changes because oftransfers andsupplementary budget .

Art.HeadingCcrtnitinent |
financialyearAmountsoutstand­
ingtobepaidat
theendof
financialyear
1979Payment*
madeAdjustmentof
balancesof
ccm;tmentsdueto
cancellations and
ECUfluctuations
1500CH^PTTR50-SOCIALFUND
EXFDvDITURZ ITQERARTICLE4
OfCOUNCILDECISIONOf
1FEBRUARY1971
Measurestoagriculturean]
textilessectors197»
1975
1976
«ut.1V7?
1977
•ut.1976
1976
1979
501
5010
5011
5C2TotalArt.500
Measuresforyoungpeople
Measuresforvocationaltraining
anageographical mobility
Total5010
Measurestocarenoteenplovment
Total5011^
TbtalArt.501
Measuresforhandicappedpersons1975
1976
■ut.1977
1977
«ut.1978
1978
YS79
1979
1970
1975
1976
•u'..1977
1977
«ut.1976
503TotalArt.>02
Measuresformigrants197»
1975
1976
•ut.1977
1977
•ut.1978
1976
1979
505TbtalArt.503
Me*.citresforvonea
TtotalArt.505
TOTALCHAPTER501976
1979
197*
1975
1976
•ut.1977
1977
apt*1970
1978
19791.560.068,57
6.1111.1151,77
20.37».303.7b
12.326.767.72
£7.5e5.366,55
<•.£33.129,12
15."3.503.31
16.625.327,077.653.59
<•79.O-0.65
050.605,26
<i12.062,3-.
122.fc59.57
730.350,55
726.3fc3.90
1:15.059,<«520.350,»3
80.266,37
263.605,69
236.602,58
•379.832,68
79.979.18
.80.996,06
107.921.19
107.1C6.C76.29 25.72»1*.239,53 1.107.S08.06
5.575.310.76
11.276.333.32
5.022.668,10
70.030.151,35
6.305.026,00
95-615.<>51,67
25
372.975-C5C.03<•96.592.31.♦
825.392,09
36.051.06c,76.♦
5.069.266,27
36.35^627.75
<:.C24.B0C.59 Ii*
120.252.173,77I•"67.028,13
12.750,32
61.610,62
•300.060,79
1fcO.OSO.88
660.156,19
0.909.200,12
4.418.795,67
69.200.545,02 .29.071-^57,©9
65.200.5^5,02f-1.7*1.459.48
29.071.&37,tÇ|1.741.459,48
442.1?5.b35.05 153.32*.011,-c>2.677.35b,19
151».152,09
966.7'«"».51
860.l37.7o
355.007.70
3.621.623.00
<•37.113.7129.5o1.67
22b.3V9.65
250.626,3e
206.177,**5
1.362.621,-.3
323.023,<.7
6.639.216,79 2.<119.010,13
165.
1.620.
<•.663.
6.615.
11.378.
12.313.
10.359.
28.077.620,53
221,01
267.39
'•63,79
259.61
635.8''
651.58
f.9.661l<t.6J3.76
716.300,Cl
1.109.656.56
<•.176.776,
3.521.760,cC
5.221.015.57
10.775*105,09
75.038.229.61 25.639.912.;?
6.886.33Î.89
17.131.563,93
20.017.917,62
1.899.
10.6b7.
37-190.
20.926.
116.755-
23.8S9.
126.219 *
307.7©5«661,19
766.05
102,27
567,35
<•00,71
105-<Ί
020,0;,
250.03
I655.377.071,561.603.327,65
6.106.309.-0
5.909.037,05
37-615.2t>
620.27b.30
1.91b.3»3,5^
3.553.3^6.ce
51.135.92b,7*
11.660.000.53
50.105.730,C7
57.603.Ht,20
217.036.611,1 »689,00
6.631,11
3.755,00
1.216,15
70.075,13
857,06
81.513.81
3.258,71
18.008,09
30.880,62
120.059.33
110.603,00
166.305,56
65.056,03
372.655,71
911.351,85
137.271,17
322.691,69
<•59-962,66
20.302,58
3e.27V,oO
309.655,05
015.52s.€6
029,56
805.56^,33
2.»00.076,05
116.15??,61

-62-
ANNEXIII
SECTIONCOMMISSION
AOCCWTTcrTH*AEtfTNJnSATIGNOFOttfidnMEMTS IN1900
ANNEX-EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUNDAPPROPRIATIONS
4.TCAIOOKN BYCa-MITMENT YEAROFAMOUNTS REMAININGTOBEPAIDAT31DECEMBER1980
ECU
Commitments .cancellations
givingriseto
cancellation of
appropriations
8rendering
appropriations
re-usableAmounts
outstandingto
bepaidforyeas
previousto
31.12.1980
(5-6to9)
10Appropriations FinancialYear1980
Commitments for
thefinancialyearPayments
made
12Sunsoutstanding
tobepaidin
financialyear
13Tbtalofsuns
outstandingto
bepaid«tthe
closeoffinanciil
year1980
(10*lit
1k
1.552.080,55
4.391.994,32
16.192.127,78
4.887.227,32
8.742.266,41
658.36c,61
1.192.2^6,31
3.891.ISO.1.530.184,23
3.447.565.05
5.792.655.48
11.320.407,49
1.364.438,74
7.275.929.16
8.015.168,44
37.616.303,30 3.69Ι.Ι58ΛΙ 38.746.568,59 34.215.186,48 15.544.946,45 18.670.239,83 57.416.808,42
3.843.328,79
9.945.732.35
4.237.315.17
17.050.209,97
676.369,92
8.338.993.07
20.595-716,211.799.010,10
846.798,98
298.550,26
'18.828.533,41
-354.689.37
50.461.634,66
115.864.629,67
44.091.949,27 20.595.716,21 188.454.046,45 281.093.993,99 75.976.496,57 205.117.497,42 393.571.543,87
1-548.317,62 36.638.930 ,23111.635.779,09 16.088.398,06 95.547.381,03 132.366.311,26
1.548.317,62 36.838.930,23 111.635.779,09 16.066.398,06 95.547.361,03132.306.311,26
44.091.949,27 22.144.033,63 225.292.976,o6 392.729.773,06 92.Oo*.894,63300.664.876,45 525.957.655,13
123.500,98
520.706,15
625.756,36
152.054,06
788.014,23
107.732,79233.007,56
1.580.708,21
7.214,51
2.317.764,57 1.820.930,28 1.820.930,28
162.321,82
1.174.799.23
2.577.451,55
484.602,30
2.003.265,32
876.850,30
150.164,89
1.110.265,06316.179.53
1.332.651,21
5.101.105,20
5.085.614,51
7.746.655.38
4-943.Oi5.c9
15.619.823.60
7.429.455,41 1.110.265,06 40-347.2*4,72 37.515.260,23 7.615-678,77 29.899.601,46 70.2*6.846,18
198.049,40
616.151.344.747.665.67
8.084.431,50
190.0*5,40 616.151.3412.832.117,17 20.956.756,34 7.151.653,68 13.605.102,46 26.637.219,63
1.8J7.903,35
29.3*1.066,0 *
9.761.19s.651
2.319.313.6c !
9-679.*53.e7
27.763.608,643.878.361,*2
5.627.015,2 *
11.152.510.9*'
ib.C ,Cfcl,
S%75.3S*etcc
bt\
1*2.377.173.93 •63.039.Β2.2.20 es2.07S.o3Ç,6 *

1i >• 5 i 7 t 9 10 11 12 13 1*
CHARTE«51-SOCIALÍINO
t*pívoιτc*·cυ·<:?β 5or
ÍOj'.ClLDECISION0'
inô*u"Y 1V71
>10Interventions toImprovethe
«ploientsituation <rcrti'fi
regions1ncert«<n»coro«iCsectors
orcertaingroup*ofundertaking »
9100 197*· 2.**2.67*,207.053,05 .46.263,3β2.367.557,77«ploientsituation 19751*.C39.lfc7,<.1 2.169.532.32 «1.116,50 5.596.*76,*6 6.*32.060,131976J7.fcl?.«n»J,,C7 7.tfcc.109,52 608.077,76 6.257.26*.*1
•»t.157737.25'/.92c-.be 5.52^.505·,91-531.2*9,26 É.9**·.COO,76 22.256.172,95I97776.*33.396,30 15»VC9.9 1,Î.92 132.99*«.7*26.657.169.71 33.799.257,*1•ut.197t22.OJ.753,117.71t.C5¿,72 «26.552,7*2.6β5·ΐβ6.77 11.636.266,36197c1^3.351-911.165c.3«i5.093,97 ιδ*.295,333.667.310,26 81.523:602,26
1979¿óc.3Ia*.9^0,7660.67*.16?.*3♦«>60.936,06 32.102.51*,291*5.999-223,70
TotalArt.510 5V6.67U*bs,fc9 17fc.220.27b,6* «•23.929,*356.991.966,1 *32.102.51*,29326.932.776,19 **9.390.*76,531*6.706.963,98 302.661.*92,55629.61*.268.7*
511 197* 9-995,59 127,72 9.867,67
persons i*?5 63t.o».·.,7530.066,12 *.2*6,3*60ΐ.5?',,62
15762.6b¿.20b,9339.212,9··-A6.379.9b 662.016,2b•ut.1977 5ic.ooc.2fc 159.^3t,5l-7.C17.75 293.93*.36 *6.617,6619773·*59.217.2 *2.302.27«·,56«56.662,53 1.100.679,30•ut.1<r7t 2.0«.7.697,261.772.926,53-20.639.65 171.136,«tl 83.19*.*7197*32.279.659.16 21.073.763,*»1♦230.1"»3,66 *.2C9.t20,75 7.226.*18,661979**-525.7*5,Cfc15.550.53t,51♦552.226,90 3.85*.035.6E 25.673-397.79
TottiArt.J11 66.152.976,33 *C.926.2*2,60 ♦759.6*0,057.2*9.029.59 3.65*.035.6c3*.861.500,5177.158-956,60 27.527.695.52 *9.631.261,26e*.512-769,79
TOTALCHARTE«}1 197».2.*52.86«,?© 7.053,05 W.391,10 2.397.*25,6*
197515.277.232,20 2.199.62c,«·»· •*5.366,8*6.596.051,08 6.*3*.193,8*1976*0.*<·«.65*,00 7.905.322.*6-í5*-*57,i*9.119.260,69
•Ut.197737.767.937,16 5.6&6.*·*,14 •539-067,01 9.23*.935.12 22.30Η.990,61197779.692.613,5 ».1t.2l2.2ifc.50 «189.677,27 27.957.669.01•ut.197I2*.*61.650,37 $.*91.779.25 •5.912,69 3.056.323.18
197$175.631.770.32 79.-íe.657,36**1*.*36,99 7.e77.i3l.0l
1979>06.6*0.733,6«.96.22s.725,5*♦1.013.163,56 35.956.5*9,97 175.672.621,*9
682.62«..*61,222i9.ni.52i >«»*335.910,62 66.2*1.015,73 35.956.5*9.97 361.fcl*.26*,70526.5*9.*33,3317*.236.679.50352.312.753,53 71*.127.036,53
CHAPTER52-SOCIALFUÑO 1976
PILOTSCHEMESΑ*0**ΕΡΑ#ΑΤΟ*Τ 1977 >76.729.55 250.621,-15 «*.*20,03 *6.813,62iïuous 1976 *52·99*,*1 252.512,63 «6.096,3* 1*.320,07
19792.319.769,09 1.0*2.***,J*♦3.028,03 12.9*5,0*1.26?.*27,5*
fOTAtINAPTE*92 3.151.513,05 1.5*5.576,52 13.5**,*061.133,69 12.9*5,0*1.5*5.*00,202.961.*50,27¿36.¿«8,052.12*.©02,223.670.002,*2
6RANDTOTAL 1·3*1.353.053,83*37.730.911,10 »*66.15*,63157.955.671,37 63.733.103.65 682.399.522,3 *1.01*.927.879,73297.*50.701.*8717.*77.178,251.399.676.700,59

Rrt .aTTriM .qHTP BETWEEN THEAPPROP RIATIONS FOR COMMITMENT
AND REQUESTS FORAID FOR 1980
ιAPPROPRIATIONS AMOUNT PERCENTAGE
Budget NomenclatureAVAILABLE REQUESTED SURPLUS
5000 Agriculture <35,(J6 38.87 10-9
5001 Textiles - •
$010 Young people -Training 281,12 465,71 65,7
5011 Young people -Employment 111,65 132,43. 18,6
5Q2Q Handicapped persons 0,08–
5G3Q' Migrant worknrs 38,03. 163,00 328,6
5Q5Q Wcmen 21,14 70,83 235,1
50 487,08 870,84 78,8
51Ö0 Regions '
5101 Groups offirms 1454,61 623,84 37,2
5102 Technical progress -
5110 Handicapped persons 77,18 127,04 64,6
512C .Industrial conversion token entry– ""
51 531,79 750,88 41,2
%
■5.200 Pilot schemes 3,05 3,83 25,6
50-52 TOTAL1.021,92 1.625,55 59,!

ANNEX V AMOUNTS REQUESTED ANDAMOUNTS REFUSED IN1980
1.Breakdown bybudget item
mECU
Amounts refused
Budget NomenclatureAmounts
requestedAmounts
agreed (*1)non-
acceptablenon-
eligiblenon-
priorityWeighted
reductionTOTAL
5000
5001Agriculture
Textiles16,26
22,6115,71
18,45
»–0,55
3,710,55
3,71
5010
5011
5020
5030
5050Young people -Training
Young people -Employment
Handicapped persons
Migrant workers
Women465,71
132,A3
163,00
70..83283,66
108,54
37,66(*2
20,950,05
0,220,01
4,21
0,24
0,82173,20
18,21
77,10
1,034,-4
48,14
47,S1177,50
22,42
125,48
49,88
50 870,84 484,97 0,27 5,28273,80 100,19 379,54
5100
5101
5102
5110
5120Regions
Groups offirms
Technical Progress
Handicapped persons
Industrial conversion597,12
2,65
24,07
127,04423,78
2,65
22,84
77,020,19
0,460,47
8,2825,02
0,83
40,65133,95 159,6-3
0,83
49,39
51 750,88 526,29 0,65 8,7566,50133,95 209,85
5200 Pilot schemes 3,83 2,96C*3-I
- - -
50-52TOTAL1.625,55 1.014,22<*40,92 14,03 340,30 234,14 589,39
(*1)Amounts after refunds ofcommitments under thefirst Decision C(80)509 of13.5.80
(*2)Including theLand Bayern commitment made in1980 against 1981 appropriations
(*3)Committed against 1981 appropriations
(*4)Taking into account amounts released from 1980 appropriations andrecommitted
against 1981 appropriations through lack ofappropriations15,36 mECU
0,15 mECU
0,87 mECU
5,86 mECU

AMOUNTS REQUESTED ANDAMOUNTS REFUSED IN1980
2.Breakdown byMember StatemECU
MEMBER STATEAmounts
requestedAmounts
agreedAmount·refused
non-acceptable non-eligible non-priorityWeighted
reductionTotal
Belgium 43/14 29,30- 0,05 7,94 5,84 13,83
Denmark 35,46 19,43- - 10>54 5,43 15,97
Germany 371/25 107,96- u,zz 113,76 145,35 263,33
France 263,83 194,96 0,23 0,27 27/27 41,10 68,87
Ireland 82,07 79,69- 0,81 0/03- 0,84
Italy 350,82 327/15 0,69 0,55 8/43 2,22 11,89
Luxembourg 0,94 0,93- - 0,01 - 0,01
Netherlands 55,52 18,30- - 33,69 2/74 36,43
United Kingdom 422,53 236,50•- 8,13 138/63 31,46 178,22
TOTAL 1.625,55 1.014,22 0,92 14,03 340,30 234/14 589,39

ANNEX VI BREAKDOWN OFREQUESTS FORAID IN1980mECU
Prioritiesnon- non-ι
non- Total
Budget Nomenclature1 2 3 4 5priority acceptabJe eligible requested
5000 Agriculture 15,71- - - - 0,55- - 16,26
5301 Textiles 18,90- - - - 3,71 22,61
5010 Young people -Training 218,68 70,84 2,93- - 173,20 0,05 0,01 465,71
5011 Young people -Employment 18,03 16,48 75,50- – 18,21 4,21 132,43
5C2C Handicapped persons- - - -
5G30 Migrant workers 85,66- - - - 77,10– 0,24 163,00
5C50Women 13,80 54,96- - - 1,03 0,22 0,82 70,83
5ΰ 370,78 142,28 78,43- - 273,80 0,27 5,28 870,84
5100 Regions 228,28 7.49100.3633.04 202,27 25,02 0,19 0,47 597,12
5101 Groups offirms 2,65- - - - – • ' 2,65
5102 Technical Progress 15,28 3,18 3,14 1,64- 0,83• 2407
5110 Handicapped persons 33,72 43,93- - - 40,65 0,46 8,28 127,04
5120 Industrial conversion- - - – –
51 279,93 54.60103.50 34.68 202,27 66,50 0,65 8,75 750,88
5200 Pilot schemes3,83_ - - - - - - 3,83
50-52TOTAL 654,54 196.88181.9334.68 ?02,27340,30 0,92 14,03 1625,55
Χ 78,15 20,93 0,92 100,00

AMOUNTSAPPROVEDIN1980
ANNEXVII
BreakdownbyMemberStateandbybudgetitem mECU
>'Belgium Denmark Germany France IrelandItalyLuxem­
bourgNethei
landsUnited
KinqdcmTOTALS
mECUXmECUXmECUXmECUXmECUXmECUXmECUXmECUXmECUXmECUX
ri000Agriculture
5001Textiles
5010Vbungpeople-Trairira
5011people-Employ -0,84
4,04
11,444,6
1/4
10,56,782/41,68
1,81
26,40
2,9910,7
9,8
9,3
2,810,03
3,16
53.23
31.2463,9
17,1
18,8
28,80,80
0,34
24,44
4,515,1
1/8
8,6
4/23,18
9,45
80,16
19,6320.2
51/2
28.3
18,10,32
0,270,1
0,20,02
0,73
2,34
0,770,1
4/0
0,8
0,72/12
85,95
37,6911/5
30,3
34,715,71
18,45
283,66
108,5410C
10G
10C
10C
5020Handicappedpersons
5030Migrantworkers
5050Women1,14
0,473,0
2,20,340,910,99
13,8529,2
66,18,63
3,6322,9
17,30,14
0,220/4
1/113,85
2,5036>8
11,9-
•0,43
0,161/1
0,82/14
0,125/7
0,637,66
20,95100
100
50 17,933/77,121/557,7211,9109,9222,730,456,3128,7726,50,590,14,450,9128,0226,4484,97100
5100Regions
5101Groupsoffirms
5102TechnicalProgress
5110Handicapped persons6,93
0,45
3,491,6
2/0
4/57,79
1,16
3,301,8
43,8
4,336,45
2,87
10,708,6
12,6
13,966,18
5,22
12,9515,6
22,8
16,837,48
11,728/9
15,2169,91
0,52
11,80
15,4640,1
19.6
52.7
20,10,340,510,02
1,26
2/422,4
5/5
3/189,02
0,97
1/24
16,6421,0
26,6
5/4
21,6423,78
2,65
22,84
77,02100
100
100
100
5120Industrial conver­
sion"
•
51 10,872/112,252/350,029,584,3516,049,209,3197,6937,6C,340,113,702/6107,8720,5526,29100
5^00Pilotschemes 0,5016,90,062/00,227/40,6923,30,041/40,6923,3--0,155,10,6120,62,9£>100
50-52 TOTAL29,302,919,431/9107,9610,6194,9619,279,697/9327,1532,30,930,118,301,8236,5023,31014,22100

ANNEX VIII-68-
BREAKDCMN OFAPPROPRIATIONS APPROVED IN1980 BY
ABSOLUTE PRIORITY REGIONS
mECU )
REGION SECTORAMOUNT Total amount
APPROVED approved per
region )
GREENLAND Regions 5.7 5.7
FRENCH Young People 0.46
OVERSEAS Handicapped 2.0
DEPARTMENTS Regions 26.7 29.16
IRELAND Agriculture 0.80
Textiles andclothing 0.34
Migrants 1.4
Young People 30.3
Women 0.22
Handicapped 12.04
Regions 37.4 82.50
MEZZOGIORNO Agriculture 0.44
Textiles andclothing 1.43
Migrants 1.6
Young People 21.4
Women 0.84
Handicapped 5.31
Regions 140.3
Technical Progress 1.47 172.79
NORTHERN IRELAND Textiles andclothing 0.06
Young People 25.03
Handicapped 2.01
45.00Regions 17.9
TOTAL 335.15 335.15

ANNEX IXCOMMITMENTS 1973-1980
Breakdown ofaidbycountry oforigin ofpromoters
MEMBER
STATEmillion u.a. million ECU
Amounts committed upto1976 for
oners tions tobecarried out inAmounts committed inPerceni tages
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 /
19781977 1978
(mECU )1977
(mECU )1980
(mECU ) 73 74 75 76 77/78 77 78 7980,i
Belgium 7,20 6,54 8,02 7,85 1,85 9,33 11,08 15,94 29,30 3,9 2,6 2,2 1,8 0,7 1,5 2,0 2,1 2a
Denmark 5,05 11,97 8,94 10,43 0,59 11,78 14,24 14,70 19,43 2,8 4,7 2,4 2,4 0,2 2,3 2,5 1,9 L.9
Germany 19,94 27,93 41,73 44,42 15,88 59,29 57,26 52,88 107,96 10,9 10,9 11,2 10,2 5,9 9,6 10,1 6,8 LQ6
France 32,19 49,95 73,83 76,60 49,80 125,74 86,20 134,82 194,96 17,7 19,6 19,8 17,5 18,6 20,4 15,2 17,4 19,2
Ireland 9,79 16,87 22,57 31,67 19,63 46,97 44,41 58,13 79,69 5,4 6,6 6,1 7,2 7,3 7,6 7,8 7,5 '.9
Italy 43,70 72,33 95,53 146,46 154,16 120,00 233,10 281,23 327,15 24,0 28,4 27,7 33,3 57,5 19,5 41,0 36,3 12,3
Luxembourg 0,04 0,01 0,03 0,07 i>,25 α,Μ - 0^23 1,00 0,93 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1- - 0,1 0.1
Netherland ;»6,77 6,71 10,94 12,58 0,09 12,26 9,81 19,32 18,30 3,7 2,6 2,9 2,9 2,0 1,7 2,5 1,8
United
Kingdom57,40 62,27 110,24 106,39 26,14 228,25 111,75
«196,43 236,50 31/5 24,5 29,6 24,4 9,7 37,1 19,7 25,4 !*3
TOTAL 182,08 254,58 371 ,83436,47 268,37 616,63 568,08 774,45 1014,22 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100 .
NB.Thefollowing twoqualifications apply tocomparisons ofthefigures inthis table :
(1)Uptoandincluding 1976 theamounts committed arethose foroperations tobecarried out
intheyear concerned .Because oftheintroduction ofthenewbudgetary system ,figures
from 1977 aretheamounts committed intheyear .
(2)Amounts uptoandincluding 1977 arecalculated intheoldunit ofaccount .Fran 1978
thenewEuropean unit ofaccount applies .Itistherefore impossible tocompare the
percentages from 1973 to1977 with those from 1978 to1980 .

ANNEX X PAYMENTS MADE IN1973-1980 ACCORDING TOTHE COUNTRY
OFORIGIN OFPROMOTERS AND THE YEAR OFCOMMITMENT
million u.a . million ECU
Member State 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979
(1) ν(2) (3)
Belgium 4,23 4,70 5,23 5,93 8,83 6,18 8,19 0,26
Denmark 4,66 11,79 8,49 9,71 12,05 12,08 10,63 8,02
Germany 16,16 25,08 39,32 30,75 52,35 46,88 29,68 30,76
France 26,60 43,33 56,87 59,52 101,61 60,77 45,00 59,38
Ireland 8,68 13,04 16,56' 25,91 42,45 29,19 39,77 41,77
Italy 32,48 60,10 72,58 114,62 136,22 117,00 107,64 68,85
Luxembourg-0,01 0,04 0,04 0,07 0,19- -
Netherlands 5,96 5,51 7,74 9,36 10,22 6,29 8,07 0,22
United Kingdom 52,95 58,49 93,90 99,25 202,05 93,33 101,68 88,70
TOTAL 151,72 222,05 300,73 355,09 565,85 371,91 350,66 297,96
O)attheDecember 1978 rate .
(?)attheDecember 1979 rate .
(3)attheDecember 1980 rate .
(4)notincluding Item 5200 Pilot Schemes andStudies .

ANNEX XISITUATION OFAMOUNTS PAID IN1980 BYCOUNTRY ANDYEAR OFCOMMITMENT
mECU
1
MEMBER STATE ' 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 TOTALS
Belgium- - 0,01 0,09 0,56 7,97 0,26 8,89
Denmark - - - 0,64 3,69 2,21 8,02 14,56
Germany - - 0,04 3,34'·21,90 18,76 30,76 74,80
France 0,01 0,77 2,59 39,01 51,81 39,44 59,38 193,01
Ireland- - 0,01 4,67 10,46 14,58 41,77 71,49
Italy 0,03 2,08 6,96 17,01 16,56 88,20 68,85 199,69
Luxembourg- - - - 0,18- - 0,18
Netherlands- - - 0,79 2,67 0,77 0,22 4,45
United Kingdom- 0,07 0,01 12,18 42,57 19,30 88,70 162,83
TOTALS 0/04 2,92 9,62 77,73 150,40 191,23 297,96 729,90*
Unit :December 1980 ECU rate .
Notincluding pilot schemes .

ANNEX XII
AMOUNTS RELEASED IN1980 FOR RE-USE
(Released from commitments in1979 )Rate :million ECU December 1979
Itan5000 5001500250105011503050505100510151025110TOTAL'%oftotal
:cinmitted
by
Countrycountry
Belgium-0,72-1,81-0,48- - -0,570,494,0725,5
Denmark- - - - - - -0,160,03-0,590,785,3
Germany- - -0,460,010,08-0,30- - -0,851,6
France 0,520,32-0,05-0,530,042,54- - -4,003,0
Ireland- - -1,611,23-0,050,85- - -3,746/4
Italy 0,110,63-2,010,310,030,1216,510,051,321,1422,237,9
Luxembourg- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Netherlands-1,08-2,36- - -1,74- -0,255,^328,1
United Kingdom-0,50-11,180,02-0,377,97- -1,4121,4610,9
TOTAL 0,633,25-19,491,571,120,5830,070,081,893,8862,56
%oftotal
committed
bybudget item |5,323,0-8,42,23,53,19,37,318,96,5 8,1
■
Netherlands 0.18
United Kingdom 11.09Thetotal amount released in1979 forre-use from commitments in1978 was 38.48 million ECU (December 1978 rate )broken
down into :Belgium 2.42 Netherlands 0.18
Denmark 1.38 United Kingdom 11.09
Germany 4.20
France 0.10
Italy 8.36
Ireland 10.752.42
1.38
4.20
0.10
8.36
10.75

ANNEX XIII
ADVANCES PAID IN1980 AGAINST COMMITMENTS MADE FROM 1977 TO1980
AND SUCH PAYMENTS ASAPERCENTAGE OFTOTAL PAYMENTS
mECU
MEMBER STATE 1977 1978 1979 1980 TOTAL ADVANCES%OFTOTAL
PAYMENTS
Belgium 0,01»
0,01 0,05 0,26 0,33 3,7
Denmark- - 0,26 8,02 8,28 56,9
Germany- - 18,76 30,76 49,52 66,2
France 4,74 7,05 37,55 59,38 108,72 56,3
Ireland 0,74 0,66 1,90 40,70 44,00 61,5
Italy 2/19 7,78 «6,22 67,14 163,33 81,8
Luxembourg - - - - - -
Netherlands - - 0,77 0,22 0,99 22/2
United Kingdom 1,76 5,12 15,97 81,06 103,91 63,8
TOTALS 9,44 20,62 161,48 287,54 479,08 65,6

ANNEX XIV ESTIMATED NUMBER OFBENEFICIARIES BYINTERVENTION
SECTOR FOR 1979 AND 1980
SECTOR BENEFICIARIES
1980 1979
Agriculture 16,700 12,000
Textiles andClothing 17,300 15,000
Migrants 267,500 285,000
Young People 655,000 450,000
Women 11,300 16,000
Regions 488,000 466,000
Technical Progress 16,586 7,430
Groups ofFirms 2,800850
Handicapped 57,500 103,930
TOTAL 1,532,686 1,356,210

ANNEX XVLIST OFAPPLICATIONS FOR ASSISTANCE FROM THE EUROPEAN
SOCIAL FUND CONCERNING "PILOT SCHEMES AND PREPARATORY
STUDIES "APPROVED BYTHECOMMISSION UNDER THE 1980 BUDGET
WOMEN
170/80ETUK
182/80EPF/I
183A/80EPB
183B/80EPB
186/80EPF
187/80EPI
191/80EPF
192/80EPF
207/80EPIRLStudy oftherequirements andproblems ofwomen andgirls
seeking toenter orre-enter employment ininner city areas .
Assisting women 'scareer advancement infirms inLyon (France )
andMilan (Italy ).
Training andpromotion ofwomen aged over 25formore
responsible jobs .
Training ofwomen forhigher grade jobs within firms in
thesecondary sector .
Training women fornewtypes ofjobcreated bytheteletext
information system inthree departments oftheAquitaine
region
Toreview andanalyse labour market requirements intwo
districts ofRome andtostudy thecreation ofnewstable
cooperative-style jobs which would enable aninitial group
ofwomen aged over 25,entrusted with organisational and
management tasks ,tobereintegrated into theworking world .
Toinduce 25women tocreate their ownjobs ,with simple
structures such asassociations andcooperatives .
Todraw upandimplement atraining programme toenable
women tosetupasshoemakers .
Improvement ofhome management skills andofjobopportunities
tohelp women wishing toreturn towork ,through the
establishment oftwosmall cooperatives bywomen with family
responsibilities .Employment Project
BTEBureau des Temps
ElémentairesUKL 35.000
FF123,591
Commission duTravail des BF1,675,554
Femmes (Ministère de
1'Emploi etduTravail )
" BF2,201,095
OREP (Office Régionale FF274,200
del'Education Permanente )
ANAPIA-CROI (Associazione LIT249,185,500
Nazionale dell' Addest­
ramento Professionale
Industria eAgricoltura )
CEPPIC (Centre de FF170000
Perfectionnement pour
1'Industrie etle
Commerce )
Institut deRecherches FF122,400
Sociales Appliquées -
Castres
Centre forAdult and IRL30,000
Community Education ,
StPatrick 'sCollège ,
Maynooth ,Ireland .Ul

194/80EPF Creation andmanagement offarms bycouples
inthe rural areas oftheMediterranean belt ofthe Midi .
YOUNG PEOPLE
181/80EPDK
190/80EPF
185A/80EPUK
1S5B /80EPUK
189/80EPNL
203/80EPI
213/80EPFScheme forestablishing aguarantee ofvocational training
oremployment foryoung unemployed persons inHobro Kommune ,
Theprogramme isaimed atyoung people with notraining .
Tolaunch ajobcreation scheme forproduction specialists
aimed atsmall undertakings ;toprovide young jobseekers
with thenecessary training toenable them totake up
these posts .
Establishment ofanexperimental handcraft training unit
inNewry toexplore ways andmeans bywhich manual skills
andideas canbeconverted into permanent jobs .
Todevelop thecapacity ofDerry Youth andCommunity
Workshop tocreate permanent newemployment opportunities
andeven toencourage theestablishment ofsmall business
concerns bytheyoung participants .
Training ofyoung people ,including thephysically
disabled ,intherestoration ofarchives andtextile
materials ofhistorical value .
Totrain young skilled workers wishing tospecialise in
building firms working abroad bymeans ofpractical
courses .Those passing thecourse arecertain tofind
employment .
Orientation andintegration into working life of
particularly disadvantaged young people .Institut deRecherches FF167,500
Sociales Appliquées -
Castres
Hobro Kommune DKR450,000
ACEREP FF317.400
Newry andMourne Cooperative UKL130,000
Society
North West Centre for UKL 65,000
Training andDevelopment ,
incorporating Derry Youth
andCommunity Workshop .
Borough ofTilburg . HFL130,000
Società italiana per LIT58,550,000
11organizzazione
internaz ional e
Association duCentre FF240,800
d'Etudes etdeRéalisations
pour 1'Education Permanente
(ACEREP )

REGIONS
206/80EPF Toprovide theoretical andpractical training inbusiness
management forunemployed managerial staff inBrittany
with aview tore-employment inmarketing andother
sectors .
212/80EPI Training ofateam todesign ,draw upandrun an
integrated national andCommunity funds scheme .
216/80EPI Techniques andskills insmall andmedium-sized firms
intheMezzogiorno .
198/80EPB Application ofsocial ,economic andtechnological
innovation through training ofworkers .
SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED UNDERTAKINGS
79/80EPUK Training forsetting upofsmall business and
entrepreneurial activity indeprived inner city areas .
214/80EPF Study forapilot scheme tohelp Livret d'Epargne
Manuelle (LEM )holders tosetupcraft under takings .
EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND
173/80ETESF Preparation ofanevaluation report ontwostudies
andeight pilot schemes financed andcarried outwith
assistance from theESFon "Training formanagement
and jobcreation insmall andmedium-sized firms ".
174/80ETESF Analysis oftraining organisations which might bethe
subject ofanapplication forESFassistance inoneof
thevarious fields ofintervention inthefive regions
ofabsolute priority .
211/80ETESF Preparation ofanewform forapplications for
assistance andforpayment ofaidgranted from theESF .Gestion -Animation
-Développement (GANIDE )FF175,320
Comunità Montana delCatria LIT 65,000,000
edel Nerone
Organizzazione per la LIT 85,000,000
Cooperazione elaSviluppo
Association pour le BF6,250,000
Développement Général dela
Région des 3Vallées (ASBL )
Greater London Council UKL 5.000
Association duCentre d'Etudes FF281,500
etdeRéalisation pour
11Education Permanente (ACEREP )
Dott .C.POLITI 13,000 ECU
1)Centre pour l'Etude des 124276ECU
problèmes del'emploi etdu
chômage (Bruxelles )
2)Kohnstamm Instituut (Amsterdam )
3)Landesinstitut Sozial forschungstelle (Dortmund )
4)MrMichael Faulkner -13QOOECU
Mrs M.ELLISON

TRAINING OFINSTRUCTORS
172/80EPI Scheme involving astudy todetermine themodifications
totraining programmes necessary inview ofthe
introduction ofdata processing into various sectors of
activity (e.g. mechanical engineering ,electrical
engineering ,electronics andprinting ).
178/80EPUK Training agroup ofnine persons toassist newly formed
work groups indeveloping viable common ownership
enterprises .These persons will themselves become
instructors located around thecountry onaregional
basis .
193/80EPF Updating ofinstructors' knowledge intheseafishing
sector .Creation andtesting ofteaching aids .
197/80EPB Introduction ofmicro-processors into teaching andthe
training ofinstructor /teachers touse thenew
techniques concerned .
208/80EPF Training of"senior "management andtechnical staff as
independent counsellors forcontinuing education
andtraining .
NEWTECHNIQl'ES (Technical Progress )
196/80EPUK Training programme forinstructors andtrainee craftsmen
inthesurgical footwear industry utilising amodular
technique innovatory tothis industry .
201/80EPF Joint training ofteam leaders andmulti-job workers
inthebuilding industry .
202/80EPF Training inaquaculture .
210/80EPFCorrespondence course ofscientific training for
senior technicians .Centro Nazionale Opere LIT119,500,000
Salesiane (CNOS )
Beechwood College UKL28,000
Centre d'Etudes et FF99,500
d'Actions sociales
Maritimes (CEASM )
Centre deCoopération BF5,995,386
technique et
pédagogique (CE.CO .
TE.PE .
Chambre deCommerce FF152,310
etd'Industrie de
Lyon
Footwear ,Leather and UKL27,750
Fur Skin Industry
Training Board
Centre d'Etudes etde FF300,383
Formation duSud-Est
Grenoble
AQUAFORM FF130,000
Université Louis
Pasteur deStrasbourg
-ESTSIT350,000
./.

HANDICAPPED PERSONS
169/80ETUK Possible improvements intheemployment andsocial progress
ofphysically handicapped young persons .
176/80EPUK Employment rehabilitation ofchronic unemployed (criminal
offenders ,alcoholics ,drug addicts ).
188/80EPNL Socio-occupational integration ofagroup ofgypsies .
195/80ETD Development andtesting ofamedical history procedure for
use asareliable and valid instrument for thepurposes of
identifying occupational areas forhandicapped persons via
rehabilitation centres .
200/80EPD Literary courses andvocational training foradult and
young Sinti (German gypsies )toenable them tolive
independently ofsocial assistance butwithout destroying
ethnic characteristics .
205/80ETF Search for thebest ways ofreintegrating certain categories
ofhandicapped persons insociety ,bearing inmind changes
inattitudes and the economic and social situation inFrance .
MIGRANT WORKERS
171/79ETF Action -research onthefull-time pre-training ofmigrant
workers .
175/80ETF Behavioural study ofmigrant workers undergoing vocational
preparation ;measures necessary toreduce thefailure rate
invocational preparation formigrant workers .
177/80EPUK Toevaluate theeffectiveness ofcurrent methods ofteaching
English tomigrants and toproduce andvalidate anewpilot
video programme .StLoves Collège UKL 8,000
National Association
for the Care and
Resettlement of
Offenders
Forschungzentrum DM98,580
für Rehabilitation
und Prävention der
Stiftung Rehabilitation
Heidelberg
Freie Hansestadt Bremen ,DM454,750
Senator für Wissenschaft
und Kunst
Fondation pour la FF208,740
recherche sociale
Agence Nationale pour le FF269,000
Développement de
1'Education Permanente
(ADEP )
Centre Régional d'Etudes FF86,787
etdeFormation du
Travail -Toulouse
British Broadcasting UKL 42,250
CorporationUKL 140,320
HFL141,700
98,580

180/80EPF Training ofteachers andsocial workers within the
context ofanaction research programme forthe
children ofmigrant workers .
184/80EPF Encouraging migrant workers toreturn totheir
countries oforigin byproviding them with a
good technical training .Institut international FF244000
deRecherche etde
Formation (IRFED )
Association pour FF60825
11Entraide etla
formation des
travailleurs africains
00o

BILAG /ANLAGE /ANNEX /ANNEXE /ALLEGATO /BIJLAGE XVi
LISTE OVER ANSØGNINGERNE GODKENT I1980
LISTE DER 1980 GENEHMIGTEN ZUSCHUS SANTRÅGE
LIST OFAPPLICATIONS FOR AID APPROVED IN1980LISTE DES DEMANDES DECONCOURS AGREEES EN1980
ELENCO DELLE RICHIESTE DlCONTRIBUTO NEL 1980
LIJST VAN DEIN1980 GOEDGEKEURDE AANVRAGEN
Land Kategori Ansvarlig myndighed gennemførelses -Antal Kommissionens tilskud
periode personer
Land Kategorie Träger DorchfOhrungs -Anzahl der Zuschuss von der Kommission
zeitraus Arbeitneh -genehmigt
mer
Country Category Responsible bodies Implementation Number of Assistance ofthe Commission
period workers
Pays Catégorie Organismes responsables Période de Effectifs Concours agréé par la
réalisation concernés Commission
Paese Categoria Organismi responsabili , Periodo di Numero di Contributo concesso dalla
realizzazione effectivi Commissione
Land Categorie Verantwoordelijke instelling Tijdvak van Aantal -η Door deCommissie toegekende
uitvoering betrokken bijstand
personen
η.v.
n.W.
η.c.
m.η.
m.η.
•η.m.
1 2 3 4 5 6
1980 1981 1982

6
1 2 3 4
1980 1981 1982
Β
ETextile
TextielOffice National del'Emploi
(ONEM )01.01.80 -31.12.80 400 34.500.000 ,-
L
6Miqrants
Migrerende werknemersFoyer des jeunes 01.11.79 -30.06.80 260 2.118.000 ,-
I
QMigrants
Migrerende werknemersOffice ίtional del'Emploi
(ONEM )01.01.80 -31.12.80 100 15.405.007 f
υ
EMigrants
Migrerende werknemersMinistère delaCulture fran­
çaise pour lecompte depromo·
teurs divers01.01.80 –31.12.80 1.300.5.466.500 ,-
Migrants
Migrerende wer !nemersService des Migrants –
Vilvorde01.01.80 -31.12.80 125 700.000 ,-
Migrants
Migrerende werknemersCommune deSt-Josse -ten-Noode 10.09.79 31.08.80 50 1.237.538 ,-
Migrants
Migrerende werknemersService social pour les
étrangers01.07.80 -30.06.83 90 2.076.641 ,- 6.480.909 ,- 5.047.677 ,-
Migrants
Migrerende werknemersLePiment 01.07.80 -31.12.80 100 844.092 ,-
Migrants
Migrerende werknemersFoyer des jeunes 01.09.80 -30.06.81 260 2.475.000 ,-
Migrants
Migrerende werknemersConseil des Immigrés de
St–Josse-ten –Noode01.09.80 -31.08.81 55 1.567.000 ,-
Migrants
Migrerende werknemersConseil desImmigrés de
Charleroi01.07.80 -30.06.81 42 607.000 ,-
Migrants
Migrerende werknemers Institut St-Laurent –Liège01.09.80 -31.08.83 100 1.141.779 ,- 566.186 ,- 528.529 ,-
Migrants
Migrerende
Jeunes
JongerenwerknemersConseil Consultatif des Bruxel­
lois n'ayant pas lanationalité
belge
Office National de1»Emploi
(ONEM )01.09.80
01.01.80 -30.06.81
31.12.80345
2.750575.000 ,-
146.250.000 ,-
Jeunes
JongerenF.N.R.S.H. 01.01.80 -31.12.80 30 9.483.909 ,-
Jeunes
JongerenOffice National del,Emploi
(ONEM )01.07.79 -30.06.80 6.879 212.853.608 ,-
Jeunes
JongerenOffice National del'Emploi
(ONEM )01.07.79 -30.06.80 4.68070.200 .Ö00,-•

2 4 56
1980 1981 1982
Β
E
h
G
τ
QJeunes
JongerenInstitut St-Laurent ,Liège 01.09.80 -30.06.83 100 3.424.138 ,- 3o424 .138 ,- 3.424.138 ,-
υ
EJeunes
JongerenOffice National del'Emploi
(ONEM )01.07.80 -31.12.80 13.650 186.651*455 ,-
Femmes
VrouwenOffice National del'Emploi
(ONEM )01.04o80 -31.12.80 150 19.200.000 ,-
ΒFemmes
VrouwenCentre REPARTIR 07.01.80 -15.12.80 15 210.000 ,-
-
L
GRéqions
Gebieden
I
ERégions
GebiedenFormation pour l'université
ouverte deCharleroi
(F.U.N.O.C. )01.01.80 -31.12.80 100 8.000.000 ,-
Régions
GebiedenFoyer Culturel duSart-Tilman 01.01.80 -31.12.80 300 8.500.000 ,-
Régions
GebiedenOffice National del'Emploi
(ONEM )01.01.80 -31.12.804.477 267.985.309,-
Proqrès technique Office National del'Emploi
(ONEM )01.01.80 -31.12.80 240 18.500.000 ,-
Handicapés
GehandicaptenFonds National deReclasse­
ment Social desHandicapés01.01.80 -31.12.80 901 73.021.575,-
Handicapés
GehandicaptenPrévoyance Sociale 01o01 e80-3lo12o82 200 20.535.000 ,- 23.334,000 ,- 26.535.000 ,-

4 56
1 2
1980 1981 1982
D Unge ^Arbejdsministeriet 01.01.80 -31.12.80 13.625 44.259.000 ,–
A
Ν
MUnge-
Unge Undervisningsministeriet 01.01.80 -21.12.80 3.800 8.957.652 ,-
A
R
ΚVandrende arbejdstagere Undervisningsministeriet og
socialministeriet -påfælgene
kommuners initiativ :Københav
Ishøj ,Høje Tåstrup ,Albert -
slund ogÅrhus01.01.80 -
s
n31.12.80 3.421 2.131.760 ,-
Vandrende arbejdstagere Undervisningsministeriet ,
Direktoratet forFolkeskolen ,
folkeoplysning ,seminarier
πι·ν· påKøbenhavns kommunes
initiativ01.01.80 -30.09.81 79 503-519 .-
Reqioner Ministeriet for Grønland 01.01.80 -31.12.80 3.343 39.609.544 ,-
Regioner Underviningsministeriet 01.01.80 -31.12.80 421 5.056.835 ,-
Regioner Arbejdsministeriet 01.01.80 -31.12.80 8.715 16.860.560,–
Regioner Ministeriet for Grønland
(Grønlands hjemmestyre )24.11.80 -17.12.80 25 93.547 ,–
Grupper afvirksomheder Arbejdsministeriet ,Direkto -
ratet forArbejdsmarkedsudda -
nnelserne01.01.80 -31.12.80 855 9.110.000 ,–
Erhvervshaemmede
Erhverνshaemmede Socialministeriet 01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.722 21.646.575 ,-
Erhvervshaemmede Socialministeriet 01.07.80 -31.12.80 837 4,286 .250,-
<-

1/} 56
1980 1981 1982
D
EJuqendliche Bundesministerium für Arbeit
und Sozialordnung01.01.80 -31.12.82 14.732 10.834.030 ,- 843.450 ,- 568.207 ,-
υ
ΤJugendliche Bundesminister für Arbeit und
Sozial Ordnung01.07.80 -30.09.83 11.851 49.482.373 ,- 452.955 455.886
S
C
ΗJugendliche Bundesministerium fürBildung
and Wessenschaft01.09.80 31.08.83 1.660 3,478.110 ,- 4.541.950 ,- 4.445.500 ,-
L
A Frauen Bundesanstalt für Arbeit 01.01.80 -31.12.82 1.905 13.104.216 ,- 4.422.469 ,- 367.072 ,-
Ν
DFrauen Der Bundesminister für Arbeit
und Sozialordnung für den
Minister fürArbeit ,Gesund -
heit une Soziales Nordhrein -
Westf alen01.03.80 30.06.82 25 75.000 ,- 100.000 ,- 100.000 ,-
Frauen Der Bundesminister für Arbeit
und Sozialordnung für den
Niedersächsischen Sozialmi -
nister01.01.80 31.12.82 310 200.000 ,- 17.500 ,- 70.000 ,-
Frauen Der Bundesminister für Arbeit
andSozialordnung für den
Ministerium fürSoziales ,
Gesundheit and Umwelt
Rheinland-Pfalz01.04.80 31.03.81 100 200.000 ,-
Frauen
FrauenDer Bundesminister für Arbeit
und Sozialordnung für den
Bundesminister fürJugend ,Fami-
lieundGesundheit (Beruf sforbi l
desdeutschen Gewerkschaftsbunde
Der Bundesminister für Arbeit
une Sozialordnung für den
Bundesminister fürJugend ,
Familie und Gesundheit
(Deutsche Angestellten
Akademie )01.01.80
J.
;>
01.01.80 -31.12.80
31.12.8050
5069.398 ,-
24.591 ,-
Frauen3undesanstalt furArbeit 01.07.80 30.06.83 2.008 4.058.311 ,- 2.807.540 ,- 394.565 ,-

6
1 2 3
<4 5
1980 1981 1982
D
E
υf
Gebiete Land Berlin (Senator für
Arbeit und Soziales )15.06.80 -31.12.80 270 305.000 ,-
Τ
sGebiete Bundesministerium für Arbeit
undSozialordnung (Bonn ) 01.01.80 -31.12.80 8.4071P.?55.750,-
c
Η
L
*Gebiete Bundesanstalt für Arbeit 01.01.80 -31.12.82 12.450 43.300.500 ,- 7.621.500 ,- 4.307.750 ,-
Gebiete Bundesministerium für Arbeit
und Sozialordnung01.09.80 -31.08.81 6-161 19·338-713,-
A
ΝTechnischer Fortschritt Kernforschungszentrum
Karlsruhe GmbH01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.400 1.193.500 ,-
Technischer Fortschritt Bildungszentrum für informa -
tionsverarbeitende Berufe01.01.80 -31.12.80 875 1.250.700 ,-
Technischer Fortschritt Bundesanstalt für Arbeit 01.01.80 -31.12.82 730 3.850.42Ó ,- 699.720 ,- 349.860 ,-
Behinderte
Behinderte Bundesminister für Arbeit für
verschiedene Einrichtungen01.07.80 -30.06.83 924 3.129.950 ,– 3.411.125 ,- 3.411.125 ,-
Behinderte Bundesminister fur Arbeit 01.04.80 -31.03.81 2.989 14.000.000 ,-
Behinderte Bundesanstalt für Arbeit 01.09.80 -31.08.82 200 1.704.000 ,- 1.704.000 ,-
Landwirtschaft Bundesanstalt für Arbeit 01.01.80 -"31.12.80 795 4.300.000 ,-
Textil Bundesanstalt für Arbeit 01.01.80 -31.12.80 2.130 4.633.250 ,-
Wander arbeit nehmer Bundesministerium für Arbeit
und Sozialordnung01.01.80 -31.12.80 376.134 24.571.060,-
Wanderarbeitnehmer Erzbistum Köln 01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.470 1.428.599 ,-
Wanderarbeitnehmer Münchener Volkhochschule 01.01.80 -31.12.80 460 160.440 ,-
Wanderarbeitnehmer Internationaler Bund für
Sozialarbeit01.01.80 -31.12.80 8.000 1.148.342 ,-
Wanderarbeitnehmer Mannheimer Abendakademie und
Volkshochschule GmbH01.09.80 30.06.81 300 19.200 ,-

4 56
1 2 3
1980 1981 1982
FAqriculture Ministère duTravail pour un
organisme public –Cellule
F.S.E.01.01.80 -31.12.80 156 518.084 ,-
A
Ν
C
εAgriculture Ministère duTravail pour deu
organismes publics etunorga
nisme privé -cellule F.S.E.c01*01*80 -31.12.80 606 4.635.492 ,-
Agriculture Ministère de1Agriculture ,
pour lui-même etd*autres
Ministères ouorganismes
publics·01.01.80 -31.12.80 6.600 50.608.800 ,-
Agriculture Ministère duTravail pour un
organisme public01.10.80 -30.09.81 120 117.000 ,-
Agriculture Ministère duTravail pour le
compte de1*Association pour
lacoordination des Formation
enEspace Rural Dévitalisé
(ACFERD )–organisme privé et
leS.G.F.P. –organisme publi01.10.80 -30.09.83 2.175 1.200.000 ,- 1.200.000 ,- 1.200.000 ,-
Textile LeMinistère duTravail ,cel­
lule F.S.E. ,pour unensemble
d'entreprises etorganismes
privés etunorganisme public01.01.80 -31.12.80 2.849 18.709.208 ,-
Jeunes Ministère duTravail (aides a
laformation )01.01.80 -31.12.80 105 1.285.165 ,-
Jeunes Ministère duTravail .Déléga­
tion àl'emploi (contrat
emploi-formation saides àla
formation )01.01.80 -31.12.80 8.750 81.886.875 ,-
Jeunes Ministère duTravail -Cellui
duFonds Social (S.N.C.F. );01.07.80 -31.12.80 180 637.249 ,-
Jeunes Association pour laformation
professionnelle des adultes
(AFPA )01.01.80 -31.12.80 7800 43.388.800 ,-
Jeuneß Ministère duTravail (aides à
l'emploi -F3)01.01.80 -31.12.80 74.000 185.250.000 ,-
Jeunes Secrétariat général àlaFor­
mation professionnelle
(S.G.F.P.)01.01.80 -30.06.80 12.700 62.720.702 ,-

- ν46
1 2 3
1980 1981 1982
Ρ
RJeune β * Ministère duTravail -Cellule
duFonds Social (Organismes
Publics etOrganismes Privés )01.01.80 -31.12.80 14.292 40.274.569 ,-
λ Jeunes Ministère duTravail (aides à
l'emploi –F3)01.01.80 -31.1 2.80 75.000 185.250.000 ,-
Ν
CJeunes Secrétariat Général ÀlaFor­
mation professionnelle
(S.G.F.P.)01.09.80 -30.06.81 11.407 51.600.000 ,-
E
Jeunes
FemmesMinistère duTravail (organis·
mesprivés )25.09.80 -31.05.81 514 2.607.827 ,-
Femmes Ministère duTravail -Cellui «
FSE pour unensemble d'orga­
nismes publics etprivés01.01.80 -31.05.81 1.338 5.691.873 ,- 2.122.546 ,-
Femmes Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation -Cellule duFS101.07.80 -30.10.81 2.19512.509.760 ,- 1.198.294 ,-
Miqrants Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation01.07.80 -30.06.81 5841.475.944 ,-
Migrants Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation -Cellule F.S.E
pour unensemble d'organismes
publics etprivés01.01.80 -31.12.80 29.12449.694.829 ,-
Réqions Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation –Cellule F.S.E.
pour unensemble d'organismes
publics etprivés01.01.80 -31.12.80 2.536 16.488.837 ,-
Régions Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation -Cellule F.S.E.
pour unensemble d'organismes
publics etprivés01.01.80 -31.12.80131 1.976.870 ,-
Régions Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation -Cellule F.S.E.
pour unensemble d'organismes
publics etprivés01.01.80 -31.12.80 6.305 86.869.590 ,-
Régions Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation -Cellule F.S.E.01.01.80 -31.12.80 24.237 158.491.746 ,-

ι 2 3 4 56
1980 1981 1982
FRegions Association pour laFormation
Permanente des Adultes -AFPAOI0OI08O -31.12.80 13.12088.060.029 ,-
R
ARegions Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation -celluleF.S.E.01.07.80 -31.08.81 1.491 29.268.742 ,-
ΝRegions Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation –CelluleF.S.E·01.07.80 -30.06.81 1.539 6.155.420 ,-
C
ERegions Association pour laFormation
professionnelle des adultes
(AFPA )01.07.80 ~31.12.80 440 4.425.000 ,-
Regions Ministère duTravail pour
A.C.F.E.R.D.01.10.80 -31.05.81 480 655.808,-
Proqrès Technique Ministère del'Industrie pour
lecompte des organismes priv
privés etpublics01.01.80
is~31.12.80 165 938.500,-
Progrès Technique Ministère duTravail pour un
ensemble d'organismes publics
etprivés -CelluleF.S.E.01.01.80 -31.12.80 2.500 25.224.945 ,-
Progrès Technique Ministère duTravail pour un
ensemble d'organismes publics
etprivés01.07.80 30.06.81 380 4.797.399 ,-
Handicapés Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation –celluleF.S.E.
pour divers organismes public
etprivés01.01.80 31.12.80 60512.057.788,-
Handicapés Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation -CelluleF.S.E.
pour divers organismes publics
etprivés01.01.80 31.12.80 3.479 50.214.218
,Handicapés Ministère duTravail etdela
Participation (CelluleF.S.E.
pour unorganisme public et
divers organismes privés01.07.80 31.08.83 745 7.932.331 ,- 4.060.498 ,- 2.499.052 ,-

6
1 2 3 4 5
1980 1981 1982
I Aqriculture Department ofLabour 01-01.80 -31.12.80 1.136 543.314 ,-
R Younq People Department ofLabour 01.01.80 -31.12.80 17.550 13.281.540 ,-
E
LYoung People National Manpower Service of
the Department ofLabour01.01.80 -31*12.80 7.460 2.301.904 ,-
A
ΝYoung People Department ofEducation on
behalf ofthe National Man­
power Service and the Depart­
ment ofEducation01.09.80 -31.08.81 6.702 5.119.447 ,-
DYoung People Department ofLabour onbehalf
oftheNational Manpower Ser­
vice ,the Department ofEdu­
cation and the Industrial
Training Authority (ANCO )01,07.80 -31.12.80 75 64.807 ,-
Women ANCO -Industrial Training
Authority01.01.80 -31.12.80 281 152.328 ,-
Reqions Kilkenny Design Workshops Ltd »01.01.80 -31.12.80 12 44.653 ,-
Regions Irish Management Institute
(IMI )01.01.80 -31.12.80 641 374.000 ,-
Regions Department ofLabour 01.01.80 -31.12.80 422 463.726 ,-
Regions Department ofLabour 01.01.80 -31.12.80 16.800 9.954.160 ,-
Regions Department ofLabour 01.01.80 -31.12.80 5.370 495.110 ,-
Regions National Manpower Services 01.01.80 -31.12.80 225 47.850 ,-
Regions Department ofLabour 01.01.80 -31.12.80 20.350 12.400.531 ,-
Regions Department ofEducation 01.09.80 -31.08.81 1.000 98.505 ,-
Regions Department ofLabour 01.09.80 -31.08.81 2.381 1.880.991 ,-
Handicapped Persons National Rehabilitation Board 01.01.80 -31.12.80 13.915 8.085.680 ,-
Textiles and Clothinq ANCO -Industrial Training
Authority01.01.80 -'31.12.80 500 230.120 ,-
k ·Migrant Workers National Manpower Service 01.01.80 - ,31.12.80 250 99.000 ,-

6
1 2 3 4
1980 1981 1982
I Aqricoltura Ente Nazionale ACLI Istrurione
Professionale (ENAIP )01.09.80 -31.08.81 1.300 799.596.000 ,-
τAgricoltura Ministero del Lavoro 01.09.80 -30.09.81 100 197.500.000 ,-
A Agricoltura Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.12.80 3.533 2.863.958.002 ,-
LTessile /Abbiqliamento Regione Lombardia 01.07.80 -30.06.81 540 1.036.200.000 ,-
Tessile /Abbigliamento Ministero del Lavoro 01.07.80 -30.06.81 2.500 4.280.448.000 ,-
ITessile /Abbigliamento Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.050 706.260.000 ,-
A Téssile /Abbigliamento Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.12.80 2.545 5.443.108.980 ,-
Lavoratori Miqranti Regione Veneto 01.01.80 _31.12.80 270 324.040.000 ,-
Lavoratori Migranti Ministero del Lavoroedella
Previdenza Sociale01.01.80 -31.12.80 40.000 555.991.500,-
Lavoratori Migranti Ministero degli Affari Esteri 01.09.80 -31.08.81 99.047 (·)
Lavoratori Migranti Regione Marche 01.09.80 -31.08.81 100 60.000.000 ,-
Lavoratori Migranti Ente Nazionale ACLI Istrudone
Professionale (ENAIP )01.08.80 -31.08.81 4.550 (··>
Lavoratori Migranti E.F.A.L. 01.10.80 -30.09.81 1.200 1.269.424.006 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 01.09.80 -30.09.81 2.326 3.608.712.500 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 01.07.80 -01.07.81 3.828 6.443.910.300 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 01.09.80 -30.06.81 187 660.898.000 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 01.09.80 -31.08.81 68.860 61.594.653.600 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 01.07.80 30.06.81 14.936 14.155.727.000 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 12.06.80 -31.12.80 10.000 9.581.537.160 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.291 1.877.313.425 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.12.80 3.273 5.666.848.750 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.07.82 1.470 2.041.444.236 ,- 393.500.000 ,- 228.000.000 ,-
Giovani E.F.I.M. (Ente finanziamento
industria manufatturiera )01.01.80 -31.12.80 105 104.442.240 ,-
Giovani Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.12.80 39.570 14.101.674.974 ,-
Giovani Regione Lazio 01.09.79 -30.07.80 600 609.545.000 ,-
Donne
Donne Regione Lombardia 01.07.80 _30.06.81 218543.714.819,-
Donne Provincia Autonoma diBolzano 01.10.80 -30.06.81 100 105.000.000 ,-
DonneI.R.I. –Istituto per la
Ricostruzione Industriale01.07.80 -30.06.81 60 360.000.000 ,-
(•)FB89.438.384 -DM12.265.000 -Lit 1.245.611.750 -FP8.234.930 -UKL757.507 -HFL562.390
(••) FB 1.425.960 -DM 1.632.000 -Lit 230.067.000 -FF 459.959 -UKL 49.381 -HFL166.968

6
1 2 3 4 5
1980 1981 1982
IDonne ENAIP (Ente Nazionale ACLI
Istruzione Professionale )01.09.80 -31.08.81 360 450.677.500 ,-
τDonne M1n .Lavoro ed.Prev .Sociale per
conto del01.10.80 -31.05.81 80 167.143.000 ,-
A
L
I
ADonne
DonneMinistero del Lavoro edella
Lombari ?"V^TÏe^^Aosfi j?'Marc '
Ministero del Lavoro edella
Previdenza Sociale ,per conto
del BTE Italia-SPO (Istituti di
Formazione )01.01.80
e,
15.01.80 -30.07.81
15.12.80830
330
)799.700.000 ,-
534.000.000 ,-62.000.000 ,–
Reqioni Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.12.80 206 319.000.000 ,-
Regioni Regione Lombardia 01.07.80 -31.12.80 140 262.500.000 ,-
Regioni Regione Campania 01.01.80 -30.06.80 4.000 5.895.648.000 ,-
Regioni Ministero del Lavoro 01.07.80 -30.06.81 2.705 7.270.380.000 ,-
Regioni Regione Piemonte 01.07.80 -30.06.81 450 504.000.000 ,-
Regioni Regione Puglia 01.07.80 -31.12.80 64 180.121.205 ,-
Regioni Ministero del Lavoro 01.09.80 -31.08.81 105.599 88.116.381.827 ,-
Regioni Ministero del Lavoro 01.07.80 -30.09.81 5.235 7.796.313.581 ,-
Regioni Regione Liguria 01.07.80 -30.06.81 495 2.646.000.000 ,-
Regioni Regione Toscana 01.10.80 -30.09.81 175 289.882.500 ,-
Regioni Regione Umbria 01.10.80 -30.09.81 895 1.123.226.200 ,-
Regioni Regione Sardegna 01.10.80 -30.09.81 3.352 6.399.112.912 ,-
Regioni Regione Basilicata 01.07.80 -'31.12.80 400 554.400.000 ,-
Regioni : Regione Friuli -Venezia -Giulia 01.09.80 -31.08.83 420 833.925.000 ,- 795.825.000 ,– 841.650.000 ,-
Regioni Regione Marche 01.10.80 -30.09.81 190 112.350.000 ,-
Regioni Regione Lombardia 01.07.80 -30.06.81 579 1.192.192.250 ,-
Regioni Regione Calabria 01.09.80 -30.09.81 2.065 5.807.776.380 ,-
Regioni Provincia Autonoma diTrento 01.10.80 -30.09.81 165 225.690.000 ,-
Regioni Provincia Autonoma diBolzano 01.10.80 -30.09.81 495 391.297.500 ,-
Regioni I.A. R.O.S. (Istituto Addestra -
mento eRicerche per l'Orga-
nizzazione dei Sistemi )01.07.80 *"30.06.81 360 1.520.641.382 ,-
Regioni Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.12.80 14.533 43.093.557.895 ,-
Regioni Regione Campania 01.01.80 -31.12.80 580 2.046.000.000 ,-
Regioni
Regioni Regione Marche 01.01.80 -31.12.81 1.340 2.838.000.000 ,- 2.130.000.000 ,-

6
1 2 3
1980 1981 1982
Regioni Regione Puglia 01.01,80 -3I0I2.8O 2.486 4.709.757.580 ,-
IRegioni Regione Umbria 01.01.80 -30.10.82 500 798.132.200 ,- 113.302.200 ,- 84.760.100 ,-
τ Regioni Regione Basilicata 01.01-80 -31.12.80 1.120 1.496.880.000 ,-
ARegioni Regione Liguria 01.01.80 -30.06.82 800 873.600.000 ,- 873.600.000 ,- 436 .8OO.000 ,-
Regioni Regione Lombardia 01.01.80 -31.12.80 379 1.261.000.000 ,-
LRegioni Regione Sardegna 01.01.80 -31.12.80 935 1.897.578.000 ,-
I Regioni Regione Valle d*Aosta 01.01.80 -31.12.80 707 1.770.920.000 ,-
ARegioni Regione Sicilia 01.01.80 -31.03.81 100 211.392.500 ,-
Regioni Regione Calabria 01.01.80 -31.12.80 440 686.868.730 ,-
Regioni Ministero del Lavoro 01.01.80 -31.12.80 9.695 14.333.399.000 ,-
Regioni SEVEL 01.01.80 -31.12.82 3.000 1.404.720.799 ,- 3.804.451.907 ,- 1.732.489.196 ,-
Proqresso Technico Ministero del Lavoro 01.07.80 30.06.83 3.972 4.229.953.900 ,- 550.000.000 ,- 600.000.000 ,-
Progresso Technico Camera diCommercio di 01.10.80 _30.09.81 170 379.500.000 ,-
Progresso TechnicoCagliari
Progresso Technico Ministero del Lavoro 01.07.80 -30.06.81 2.350 3.472.000.000 ,-
Progresso Technico Ministero del Lavoro e
Previdenza socialedella 01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.703 2.749.397.500 ,-
Progresso Technico Ministero del Lavoro e
Previdenza socialedella 01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.100 2.326.308.000 ,-
Gruppo diimprese Regione Liguria 01.04.80 -30.06.80 60 69.450.000 ,-
Gruppo diimprese Ministero del Lavoro e
Previdenza socialedella 01.01.80 -31.12.80 340 561.000.000 ,-
Minorati Ministero del Lavoro e
Previdenza socialedella 01.01.80 -31.12.81 7183.138.091.750,--
Minorati Istituto per laRicostruzione 01.07.80 M30.06.81 100 862.524.300 ,-
Industriale (IRI )
Minorati Ministero del Lavoro e
Previdenza socialedella 01.07.80 ■30.09.83 4.4227.696.104 .360** 1*929*600.000 500.000.000 ,-
Minorati Opera Juventutis 01.01.80 »31.12.80 110 173.640.830 ,-
Minorati Ministero del Lavoro e
Previdenza socialedella 01.01.80 31.12.812.628 4.977.855.835,- 139.600.000,-

1 2 3 4 56
1980 1981 1982
L/
Jeunes
υ Jeunes Ministère d'Education 01.01.80 -31.12.80 300 13.063.000 ,-
Nationale
Χ
Jeunes Administration del'Emploi 01.01.80 -31.12.80 860 10.987.389 ,-
E
M Handicapés Ministère duTravail 01.01.80 -31.12.82 42 2.937.278 ,- 2.937.278 ,- - 1.229.000 ,-
Β Handicapés Association d'assurance contre 01.01.80 -31.12.80 2 500.000 ,-
les accidents -Section indus·
0 trielle
υ Handicapés Office deplacement etderéé -01.01.80 -31.12.80 133 6.310.000 ,-
ducation professionnelle des
R travailleurs handicapés
G
– ––
•-

6
1 2 3
1980 1981 1982
Ν
ELandbouw Stichting Ontwikkelings -en
Saneringsfonds voor deLand-
bouw01.01.80 -31.12.80 25 50.000 ,-
DTextiel Ministerie van Sociale Zaken 01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.000 3.200.000 ,-
εJonqeren Ministerie van Sociale Zaken 01.01.80 -31.12.80 3.775 6.393.750 ,-
RJongeren Ministerie van Sociale Zaken 01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.000 2.145.000 ,-
L
A
ΝJongeren Ministerie van Cultuur ,
Recreatie enMaatschappelijk
Werk (C.R.M. )01.01.80 -31.12.80 10 96.875 ,-
D
E Vrouwen Ministerie van SociaLe Zaken 01.01.80 -31.12.80741 453.725 ,-
ΝTechnische Vooruitqanq Ministerie van Sociale Zaken 01.01.80 -31.1 .80 1.250 4*500.000 ,-
Gehandicapten
Gehandicapten Ministerie van Sociale Zaken 01.01*80 -31.12.82 200 690.000 ,- 1.730.000 ,- 880.000 ,-
Gehandicapten Ministerie van Sociale Zaken 01.01*80 -31.12.80 895 3.405.125 ,-
Gebieden Ministerie van Sociale Zaken 01.01.80 -31.12.80 2.625 15.000.000 ,-
Gebieden Ministerie van Sociale Zaken 01.01.80 -31.12.80 2.650 12.755.000 ,-
Miqrerende werknemers Ministerie van Sociale Zaken 01.01.80 -31.12.80 55 195 .522 .,-
Migrerende werknemers Ministerie vanCultuur ,
recreatie enmaatschappelijk
werk01.01.80 -31.12.80 22.400 744.181 ,-
Migrerende werknemers Ministerie vanOnderwijs en
Wetenschappen01.01.80 -31.12.80 200 237.500 ,-

15.
6
1 2 3 4 5
1980 1981 1982
υ/
Textiles and Clothinq Department ofEmployment 01.01.80 31.03.80 750 100.000 ,-
Ν Textiles andClothing Cotton and Allied Textiles
Industry Training Board01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.680 216.500 ,-•
Textiles andClothing Department ofEmployment 01.01.80 -31.12.80 600 813.632 ,-
τ
ΕTextiles andClothing Department ofEmployment 01.01.80 -31.12.80 544 33.319 ,-
Textiles andClothing Lyle and Scott Ltd 01.07.80 -30.06.81 55 2.016 ,-
Textiles andClothing Northern Ireland Training
Executive01.09.80 -31.08.81 88 36.002 ,-
Κ Younq People Department ofEmployment for01.01.80 -31.12.80 3.738 207.806 ,-
τManpower Services Commission
J.
ΝYoung People Northern Ireland Training Exe­
cutive for Industrial Trainine
Boards01.01.80 –30.04.81 390 528.425 ,-
•
6
DYoung People Department ofManpower Servie *
(Northern Ireland )s01.04.80 -31.03.81 12.804 11.251.392 ,-
0
ΜYoung People Department ofManpower Servi­
ces (Northern Ireland )01.05.80 -31.03.81 680 275.468 ,-
Young People Manpower Services Commission 01.01.80 -31.12.80 65.142 17.804.543 ,-
Young People Department ofEmployment 01.01.80 - -30.04.81 195 32.906 ,- 2.250 ,-
Young People Department ofEmployment for
Manpower Services Commission01.01.80 -31.12.80 7.1793.268.368 ,-
Young People Department ofEmployment for
Manpower Services Commission01.01.80 -31.12.80 3.738 1.249.566 ,-
Young People Manpower Services Commission 01.01.80 -31.12.80 65.14210.391.700 ,-
Young People Department ofEmployment for
Manpower Services Commission01.01.80 -31.12.80 1.446 362.992 ,-
Young People Department ofEducation for
Northern Ireland01.09.80 -31.08.81 1.926 1.347.408 ,-
Young People Northern Ireland Training
Executive01.09.80 -31.08.81 914 635.827 ,-
Young People Department ofEmployment for
Manpower Services Commission01.07.80 -30.06.81 4.368 4.489.294 ,-

A2 3 4 56
1980 1981 1982
υ
Ν
IYoung People Department ofEmployment for
Manpower Services Commission01.07.80 -31.08.81 615690.400,-
Young People Department ofEmployment for
two local authoritiesOI.IO08O -30.09.81 150 36.463,-
Τ
£Young People Department ofEmployment for
Manpower Services Commission01.01.80 -3I0I2.8O 19.750 7.572.080 ,-
DYoung People Department ofEmployment for
Manpower Services Commission01.07o80 -31.12.80 30.11011.827.291 ,-
ΚWomen Department ofEmployment for
Public and Privates Bodies01.01.80 –31.12.82 168 4S.583 7.247,- 8.671,-
I
Ν Reqions Department ofEmployment 01o01o80 _31.12.81 3.8005.000.000 ,- 2.500.000 ,-
G Regions Construction I.T.B o 01o04„80 -3I0O3.8I 339 37.350,-
D Regions Department ofEmployment 01.04.80 -31.03.81 4.8401.275.000 ,-
0
MRegions Department ofManpower Servi­
ces (NI)01*01.80 -31.12.80 4.3762.200.000 ,-
Regions Department ofManpower Servi­
ces (Northern Ireland )01.04.80 -31.03.81 12o9187.438.831,-
Regions Road Transport I.T.B.
(Northern Ireland )01o01o80 -31.12.80 115 38.387,-
Regions Department ofEmployment 01.01.80 -31.03.81 5.188 661.223,-
Regions Department ofEmployment 01.04.80 -31.03.80 2.910 2.017.385 ,-
Regions Department ofEmployment 01.01.80 -31.12.80 37.581 5β082.947,-
Regions Department ofEmployment 01.01.80 -30.09.80 300 60.000,-
Regions Department ofEmployment 01.01.80 -31.03.82 2.458 401.225,- 136.061,- 88o185,-
Regions Durham University Business
School01.01.80 -31.12,82 340 16.222,- 19.497,- 23.406,-
RegionsDistributive Industry Trainine
Board (Northern Ireland )01.04.80 31.03.81 45 11.832,-

46
1 2 3
1980 1981 1982
υ Regions , Department ofEmployment01.04.80 -31.03.81 1.500 1.400.000 ,-
Ν Regions Department ofEmployment01.04.80 -31.03.81 27.902 16.108.725,-
I Regions Department ofEmployment 01.04.80 -31.03.81 1.554 2.136.672 ,-
τ Regions Merthyr Tydfil Borough Cound.1 01.09.80 -31.08.81 16 21.057 ,-
Ε Regions Department ofEmployment 01.07.80 -31.03.81 6.000 4.000.000 f-
D Regions Department ofEducation for
Northern Ireland01*09.80 -31.08.81 608 246.965 ,-
ΚRegions Northern Ireland Training
Executive (N.I.T.E. )01.09.80 -31.08.81 286 133.188 ,-
I Regions Department ofEmployment 01.09.80 -31.03.81 70 19.000 ,-
Ν Regions Department ofEmployment 01.07.80 -30.09.83 1.606 22.425 ,- 60.728 ,- 60.116 ,-
G Technical Progress Department ofEmployment / 01.01.80 -31.09.81 16 6.550 ,- 5.300 ,-
Manpower Services Commission
D
0Technical Progress Department ofEmployment /
Manpower Services Commission01.01.80 -31.12.82 300 198.976 ,- 218.874 ,- 240.761 ,-
M Technical Progress Wand JLinnçy Ltd 01.07.80 -30.06.83 85 14.020 ,- 17.600 ,- 18.248 ,-
Groups ofEnterprises British Fishing Federation 01.01.80 -31.12.82 1.533 157.626 ,- 185.636 ,- 201.140 ,-
Handicapped persons Department ofHealth and
Social Services ,Northern
Ireland01.04.80 -31.03.81 8.225 848.761 ,-
Handicapped persons Department ofManpower Servit »
ces (Northern Ireland )01.04.80 -31.03.81 642 462.083 ,-
Handicapped persons
Handicapped persons
Handicapped persons Department ofEmployment for
the Manpower Services Commis­
sion (ESD +TSD )01.01.80 -31.03.81 13.889 8.020.652,-
Migrant workers Home Office ,Scottish Offfice
and local authorities01.01.80 -31.12.80 14-849 698.452,-

18.
U
N
I
T
E
D
K
I
N
G
D
0
MMigrant workers
Migrant workersDepartment ofEmployment ,
Manpower Services Division ,
Training Services Division
Home Office ,Scottish Office
and local authoritiesOI.OI08O -31.12.80 2.323
01.07.80 -31.12.80 1.9851980
172.969,-
331.115,-1981 1982