JOINT STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy Statistical Annex Accompanying the document JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF REGIONS Neighourhood at the Crossroads: Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2013 /* SWD/2014/098 final */





Contents Section I: Democracy, Good Governance and Human rights.............................5 1. State of ratification/signature of selected human rights conventions...….............…....5 2. Deep Democracy Indicators................................................................................................8 2.1 Transparency International Corruption Perception Index (2012-2013)................................8 2.2 Freedom House: Freedom in the World (2013-2014)............................................................9 2.3 The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy (2012)........................................10 2.4 World Press Freedom Index (2011-2013)...........................................................................11 2.5 Freedom House: Freedom on the Net 2013........................................................................12 3. Other Human Rights indicators........................................................................................13 3.1 Death Penalty (as of 30 June 2013)....................................................................................13 3.2 LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) rights (2013)........................................14 3.3 Ratification of core labour standards (2013).......................................................................15 3.4 Gender Inequality Index (2013)..........................................................................................16 3.5 Global Gender Gap Index 2010-2013.................................................................................17 4. Other indicators..................................................................................................................18 4.1 UNDP Human Development Index (2012).........................................................................18 4.2 Global Peace Index Ranking (2012-2013)..........................................................................19 4.3 Ranking of Happiness (2010-2012)....................................................................................20 4.4 World Bank’s “Doing Business 2014” Ranking (2012-2013)............................................21 4.5 Global Competitiveness Index 2012–2014 ........................................................................22 Section II: Macroeconomic Indicators.......................................................................23 1. Basic data............................................................................................................................23 2. Real GDP Growth rate.......................................................................................................24 3. Inflation rate, average (%).................................................................................................25 4. GDP per capita (in EUR)...................................................................................................26 5. Unemployment rate (% of labour force).........................................................................27 6. Employment rate................................................................................................................28 7. Government debt and Current account balance (% of GDP)........................................29 8. Trade balance......................................................................................................................30 Section III: The EU and the Partners.........................................................................31 1. Main agreements in force with partners..........................................................................31 2. Trade flows..........................................................................................................................33 2.1 EU Trade with Partners (million EUR)...............................................................................33 2.2. Share of EU in ENP trade..................................................................................................34 2.3 EU trade with the world (2012-Oct 2013)..........................................................................35 2.4 Breakdown of Southern ENP Partners' trade with the EU (2012-Oct 2013)......................36 2.5 Breakdown of Eastern ENP Partners' trade with the EU (2012- Oct 2013).......................37 3. Participation of Neighbourhood countries in FP7..........................................................38 4. Schengen visas issued by partner in 2012.......................................................................39 5. European Integration Index for Eastern Partnership countries Open Societies Foundations / Renaissance Foundation................................................40 Section IV: EU financial support to Partners................................................................41 1. Commitments amounts under ENPI................................................................................41 2. ENPI – Cross Border Cooperation (allocations 2007 – 2013).....................................42 3. Fiches covering EU financial support by partner (2007 – 2013) ................................43 ALGERIA.......................................................................................................................43 ARMENIA......................................................................................................................45 AZERBAIJAN................................................................................................................47 BELARUS......................................................................................................................49 EGYPT...........................................................................................................................51 GEORGIA......................................................................................................................53 ISRAEL..........................................................................................................................55 JORDAN........................................................................................................................56 LEBANON.....................................................................................................................58 LIBYA...........................................................................................................................60 REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA............................................................................................62 MOROCCO....................................................................................................................64 PALESTINE...................................................................................................................66 SYRIA............................................................................................................................68 TUNISIA........................................................................................................................70 UKRAINE......................................................................................................................72 4. ENPI Regional East allocations 2007 – 2013.................................................................74 5. ENPI Regional South allocations 2007 – 2013..............................................................75 6. ENPI Interregional allocations 2007 – 2013...................................................................77 7. Mobility of students and researchers...............................................................................78 7.1 Participation of Partners in FP7 Marie Curie Actions 2007-2013......................................78 7.2 Youth in Action Mobility Figures 2012 – 2013..................................................................79 7.3 Mobility under Erasmus Mundus, Action 1 and Action 2, 2013........................................80 7.4 Tempus IV –projects per Partner accepted in 2013............................................................81 8. TAIEX Events, SIGMA Operations and Twinning projects with ENP Partners.......82 8.1 Breakdown of TAIEX requests from ENP Partner countries and Russia...........................82 8.2 Single ENP Partner Events 2007-2013...............................................................................83 8.3 Number of Participants (Single and Multi-ENP partner Events 2006-2013).....................84 8.4 TAIEX ENPI Sector coverage (2006-2013).......................................................................85 8.5 Type of assistance provided (2009-2013) ..........................................................................86 8.6 SIGMA 2008-2013.............................................................................................................87 8.7 Twinning projects...............................................................................................................89 8.8 Twinning projects ENP 2005 – 2013 (per sector) .............................................................90 8.9 Twinning projects by sector................................................................................................91 8.10 Number of twinning proposals by Member States (2005 – 2013)....................................92 8.11 Member States selected in twinning projects (2005 – 2013)............................................93 9. Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF) Projects in 2013........................................94 9.1 Projects approved for a contribution in 2013......................................................................94 9.2 Distribution of NIF contribution by sector in 2013............................................................96 9.3 NIF contributions pledged by Member States 2008 – 2013...............................................97 9.4 NIF contributions pledged by Partner country....................................................................98 Section I: Democracy, Good Governance and Human rights 1. State of ratification/signature of selected human rights conventions * OP: Optional Protocol * Date of signature in bold; date of ratification in standard. Also in bold where an instrument has been neither signed nor ratified (“NO”). * R: text adopted with reservations State of ratification/ signature of major HR conventions * || ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights OP1* OP2 || ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights OP || CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women OP || CAT Convention against Torture OP Right to Individual Complaint (Art.22) || CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child OP AC OP SC ALGERIA || 12/09/1989 || 12/09/1989 || 22/05/1996 - R || 12/09/1989 || 16/04/1993 OP1 - 12/09/1989 || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP-AC – 06/05/2009 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 11/05/1994 || OP-SC - 27/12/2006 ARMENIA || 23/06/1993 || 13/09/1993 || 13/09/1993 || 13/09/1993 || 23/06/1993 OP1 - 23/06/1993 || OP – 29/09/2009 || OP - 14/09/2006 || OP 14/09/2006 || OP-AC - 30/09/2005 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 - NO || OP-SC - 30/06/2005 AZERBAIJAN || 13/08/1992 || 13/08/1992 || 10/07/1995 || 16/08/1996 || 13/08/1992 OP1 - 27/11/2001 || OP-25/09/2009 || OP - 01/06/2001 || OP 28/01/2009 || OP-AC - 03/07/2002 OP2 - 22/01/1999 || || || Art. 22 4/02/2002 || OP-SC - 03/07/2002 BELARUS || 12/11/1973 || 12/11/1973 || 04/02/1981 || 13/03/1987 || 01/10/1990 OP1 - 30/09/1992 || OP - NO || OP - 03/02/2004 || OP – NO || OP-AC - 25/01/2006 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 - NO || OP-SC - 23/01/2002 EGYPT || 14/01/1982 || 14/01/1982 || 18/09/1981 R || 25/06/1986 || 06/07/1990 R OP1 - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP-AC - 06/02/2007 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 - NO || OP-SC - 12/07/2002 * OP: Optional Protocol * Date of signature in bold; date of ratification in standard. Also in bold where an instrument has been neither signed nor ratified (“NO”). * R: text adopted with reservations GEORGIA || 01/05/1994 || 3/05/1994 || 26/10/1994 || 26/10/1994 || 02/06/1994 OP1 - 03/05/1994 || OP – NO || OP – 01/08/2002 || OP - 09/08/2005 || OP-AC – 03/08/2010 OP2 - 22/03/1999 || || || Art. 22 30/06/2005 || OP-SC - 28/06/2005 ISRAEL || 03/10/1991 || 03/10/1991 || 03/10/1991 R || 03/10/1991 R || 03/10/1991 OP1 - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP-AC - 18/07/2005 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 - NO || OP-SC - 23/07/2008 JORDAN || 28/05/1975 || 28/05/1975 || 01/07/1992 R || 13/11/1991 || 24/05/1991 R OP1 - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP – NO || OP-AC - 23/05/2007 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 - NO || OP-SC - 04/12/2006 LEBANON || 3/11/1972 || 03/11/1972 || 16/04/1997 R || 05/10/2000 || 14/05/1991 OP1 - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP – 22/12//2008 || OP-AC - 11/02/2002 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 - NO || OP-SC - 08/11/2004 LIBYA || 15/05/1970 || 15/05/1970 || 16/05/1989 – R || 16/05/1989 || 15/04/1993 OP1 - 16/05/1989 || OP - NO || OP - 18/06/2004 || OP – NO || OP-AC - 29/10/2004 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 - NO || OP-SC - 18/06/2004 MOROCCO || 03/05/1979 || 03/05/1979 || 21/06/1993 R || 21/06/1993 R || 21/06/1993 R OP1 - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP-AC - 22/05/2002 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 19/10/2006 || OP-SC - 02/10/2001 REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA || 26/01/1993 || 26/01/1993 || 01/07/1994 || 28/11/1995 || 26/01/1993 OP1 - 23/01/2008 || OP - NO || OP - 28/02/2006 || OP 24/07/2006 || OP-AC - 7/04/2004 OP2 - 20/09/2006 || || || Art. 22 - NO || OP-SC - 12/04/2007 * OP: Optional Protocol * Date of signature in bold; date of ratification in standard. Also in bold where an instrument has been neither signed nor ratified (“NO”). * R: text adopted with reservations SYRIA || 21/04/1969 || 21/04/1969 || 28/03/2003 || 19/08/2004 || 15/07/1993 OP1 - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP - NO || OP-AC - 17/10/2003 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 - NO || OP-SC - 15/05/2003 TUNISIA || 18/03/1969 || 18/03/1969 || 20/09/1985 R || 23/09/1988 R || 30/01/1992 OP1 – 29/06/11 || OP - NO || OP - 23/09/2008 || OP – 29/06/2011 || OP-AC - 02/01/2003 OP2 - NO || || || Art. 22 22/09/1988 || OP-SC - 13/09/2002 UKRAINE || 12/11/1973 || 12/11/1973 || 12/03/1981 || 24/02/1987 || 28/08/1991 OP1 - 25/07/1991 || OP – 24/09/09 || OP - 26/09/2003 || OP - 19/09/2006 || OP-AC - 11/07/2005 OP2 - 25/07/2007 || || || Art. 22 12/09/2003 || OP-SC - 03/07/2003 Source: http://treaties.un.org Art. 22 CAT: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/HRIndicators/Ratification//Status_CAT.pdf 2. Deep Democracy Indicators 2.1 Transparency International Corruption Perception Index (2012-2013) The Corruption Perceptions Index ranks countries/territories based on how corrupt their public sector is perceived to be. A country/territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 – 100, where 0 means that a country is perceived as highly corrupt and 100 means that a country is perceived as very clean. A country's rank indicates its position relative to the other countries/territories included in the index. 2012 2013 Rank (1-174) Score Rank (1-177) Score Algeria || 105 || 34 || 94 || 36 Armenia || 105 || 34 || 94 || 36 Azerbaijan || 139 || 27 || 127 || 28 Belarus || 123 || 31 || 123 || 29 Egypt || 118 || 32 || 114 || 32 Georgia || 51 || 52 || 55 || 49 Israel || 39 || 60 || 36 || 61 Jordan || 58 || 48 || 66 || 45 Lebanon || 128 || 30 || 127 || 28 Libya || 160 || 21 || 172 || 15 Republic of Moldova || 94 || 36 || 102 || 35 Morocco || 88 || 37 || 91 || 37 Palestine || N/A || N/A || N/A || N/A Syria || 144 || 26 || 168 || 17 Tunisia || 75 || 41 || 77 || 41 Ukraine || 144 || 26 || 144 || 25 Source: 2012 report: http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2012/results/ 2013 report: http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/ 2.2 Freedom house: Freedom in the World (2013 - 2014) Freedom in the world report assesses the real-world human rights and fundamental freedoms enjoyed by individuals. Freedom house assessment 2014 is based on data from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. Freedom score is graded using a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 represents the maximum freedom. The 2014 edition covers developments in 195 countries and 14 territories. || 2013 || 2014 || Freedom rating || Freedom Status || Freedom rating || Freedom Status Algeria || 5.5 || Not Free || 5.5 || Not Free Armenia || 4.5 || Partly Free || 4.5 || Partly Free Azerbaijan || 5.5 || Not Free || 6 ▼ || Not Free Belarus || 6.5 || Not Free || 6.5 || Not Free Egypt || 5 || Partly Free || 5.5 ▼ || Not Free Georgia || 3 || Partly Free || 3 || Partly Free Israel || 1.5 || Free || 1.5 || Free Jordan || 5.5 || Not Free || 5.5 || Not Free Lebanon || 4.5 || Partly Free || 4.5 || Partly Free Libya || 4.5 || Partly Free || 4.5 || Partly Free Republic of Moldova || 3 || Partly Free || 3 || Partly Free Morocco || 4.5 || Partly Free || 4.5 || Partly Free Palestine || 5.5 West Bank 6 Gaza Strip || Not Free || 5.5 West Bank 6.5 Gaza Strip ▼ || Not Free Syria || 7 || Not Free || 7 || Not Free Tunisia || 3.5 || Partly Free || 3▲ || Partly Free Ukraine || 3.5 || Partly Free || 3.5 || Partly Free Source: Freedom in the World 2013: http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2013#.UuIySnevmUk Freedom in the World 2014: http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2014#.UuIyCXevmUm 2.3 The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy (2012) The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy provides a snapshot of the state of democracy worldwide for 165 independent states and two territories - this covers almost the entire population of the world and the vast majority of the world’s states (micro states are excluded). The Democracy index is based on five categories: electoral process and pluralism; civil liberties; the functioning of government; political participation; and political culture. Countries are placed within one of four types of regimes: 1) full democracies; 2) flawed democracies; 3) hybrid regimes; and 4) authoritarian regimes. || Rank 2012 || Type of regime Algeria || 118 || Authoritarian Armenia || 114 || Hybrid Azerbaijan || 139 || Authoritarian Belarus || 141 || Authoritarian Egypt || 109 || Hybrid Georgia || 93 || Hybrid Israel || 37 || Flawed Jordan || 121 || Authoritarian Lebanon || 99 || Hybrid Libya || 95 || Hybrid Republic of Moldova || 67 || Flawed Morocco || 115 || Hybrid Palestine || 103 || Hybrid Syria || 164 || Authoritarian Tunisia || 90 || Hybrid Ukraine || 80 || Hybrid Source: Report 2012: http://www.eiu.com/public/thankyou_download.aspx?activity=download&campaignid=DemocracyIndex12 Report 2013: data not available at the time of writing 2.4 World Press Freedom Index (2011-2013) The index is a reflection of the attitudes and intentions of governments towards media freedom, ranking from 1-179. Many criteria are considered, ranging from legislation to violence against journalists. Rank 2011-2012 Rank 2013 Change in rating Algeria || 122 || 125 || -3 Armenia || 77 || 74 || +3 Azerbaijan || 162 || 156 || +6 Belarus || 168 || 157 || +11 Egypt || 166 || 158 || +8 Georgia || 104 || 100 || +4 Israel || 92 || 112 || -20 Jordan || 128 || 134 || -6 Lebanon || 93 || 101 || -8 Libya || 154 || 131 || +23 Republic of Moldova || 53 || 55 || -2 Morocco || 138 || 136 || +2 Palestine || 153 || 146 || +7 Syria || 176 || 176 || 0 Tunisia || 134 || 138 || -4 Ukraine || 116 || 126 || -10 Source http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2013,1054.html 2.5 Freedom House: Freedom on the Net 2013 Country || Freedom on the Net 2013 Status || Freedom on the Net 2013 Total 0-100 Points || A. Subtotal: Obstacles to Access 0-25 Points || B. Subtotal: Limits on Content 0-35 Points || C. Subtotal: Violations of User Rights 0-40 Points Armenia || Free || 29 || 8 || 9 || 12 Azerbaijan || Partly Free || 52 || 13 || 17 || 22 Belarus || Not Free || 67 || 16 || 22 || 29 Egypt || Partly Free || 60 || 15 || 12 || 33 Georgia || Free || 26 || 8 || 7 || 11 Jordan || Partly Free || 46 || 13 || 13 || 20 Lebanon || Partly Free || 45 || 14 || 10 || 21 Libya || Partly Free || 45 || 17 || 9 || 19 Morocco || Partly Free || 42 || 11 || 7 || 24 Syria || Not Free || 85 || 24 || 25 || 36 Tunisia || Partly Free || 41 || 12 || 8 || 21 Ukraine || Free || 28 || 7 || 7 || 14 Source: Freedom House, 2013 Global Scores, http://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net-2013-global-scores 3. Other Human Rights indicators 3.1 Death Penalty (as of 30 June 2013) Is death Penalty applied? Death Penalty || UN resolution in favour of a universal moratorium on the Death Penalty (adopted on 20 December 2012) Algeria || De facto moratorium since 1993 || In favour Armenia || Abolished by Constitution || In favour Azerbaijan || Abolished by Constitution || In favour Belarus || Applied || Abstained Egypt || Applied || Against Georgia || Abolished by Constitution || In favour Israel || Abolished for ordinary crimes by Constitution || In favour Jordan || De facto moratorium since 2006 || Abstained Lebanon || Applied || Abstained Libya || De facto moratorium since 2011 || Against Republic of Moldova || Abolished by Constitution || In favour Morocco || De facto moratorium since 1993 || Abstained Palestine || De facto moratorium in West Bank since 2005 Applied in Gaza Strip || Non UN member State Syria || Applied || Against Tunisia || De facto moratorium since 1991 || In favour Ukraine || Abolished by Constitution || In favour Source: http://www.handsoffcain.info/bancadati/index.php?tipotema=arg&idtema=17000605 3.2 LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) rights (2013) Is homosexuality legal / illegal? Algeria || Illegal Armenia || Legal Azerbaijan || Legal Belarus || Legal Egypt || Illegal for male to male relationships / Unclear for female to female relationships Georgia || Legal Israel || Legal Jordan || Legal Lebanon || Illegal Libya || Illegal Republic of Moldova || Legal Morocco || Illegal Palestine || Illegal for male to male relationships / Legal for female to female relationships Syria || Illegal Tunisia || Illegal Ukraine || Legal Source: http://ilga.org 3.3 Ratification of core labour standards (2013) The core labour standards are fundamental principles that protect basic human rights in the workforce. As stated in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (1998) the core labour standards aim to: (1) eliminate all forms of forced or compulsory labour; (2) effectively abolish child labour; (3) eliminate discrimination in respect of employment and occupation; and (4) ensure the freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining. || Elimination of forced and compulsory labour || Abolition of child labour || Elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation || Freedom of association and collective bargaining Convention || C29 || C105 || C138 || C182 || C100 || C111 || C87 || C98 Algeria || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Armenia || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Azerbaijan || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Belarus || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Egypt || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Georgia || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Israel || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Jordan || X || X || X || X || X || X || Not ratified || X Lebanon || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Libya || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Republic of Moldova || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Morocco || X || X || X || X || X || X || Not ratified || X Palestine || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || - Syria || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Tunisia || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Ukraine || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X Source: ILOLEX, http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/newratframeE.htm 3.4 Gender Inequality Index (2013) The Gender Inequality Index (GII) reflects women’s disadvantage in three dimensions: reproductive health, empowerment and the labour market. The index shows the loss in human development due to inequality between female and male achievements in these dimensions. It ranges from 0, which indicates that women and men fare equally, to 1, which indicates that women fare as poorly as possible in all measured dimensions. Ranking (1-187) GII Human development category Algeria || 74 || 0.391 || High Armenia || 59 || 0.340 || High Azerbaijan || 54 || 0.323 || High Belarus || N/A || N/A || High Egypt || 126 || 0.590 || Medium Georgia || 81 || 0.438 || High Israel || 25 || 0.144 || Very high Jordan || 99 || 0.482 || Medium Lebanon || 78 || 0.433 || High Libya || 36 || 0.216 || High Republic of Moldova || 49 || 0.303 || Medium Morocco || 84 || 0.444 || Medium Palestine || N/A || N/A || Medium Syria || 118 || 0.551 || Medium Tunisia || 46 || 0.261 || High Ukraine || 57 || 0.338 || High Source: UNDP, http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/ 3.5 Global Gender Gap Index 2010 - 2013 Rankings The Global Gender Gap Report, introduced by the World Economic Forum in 2006, provides a framework for capturing the magnitude and scope of gender-based disparities around the world. The index benchmarks national gender gaps on economic, political, education- and health-based criteria and provides country rankings that allow for effective comparison across regions and income groups and over time. The Global Gender Gap Report 2013 benchmarks national gender gaps of 136 countries. || Rank 2010 || Rank 2011 || Rank 2012 || Rank 2013 Algeria || 119 || 121 || 120 || 124 Armenia || 84 || 84 || 92 || 94 Azerbaijan || 100 || 91 || 99 || 99 Belarus || N/A || N/A || N/A || N/A Egypt || 125 || 123 || 126 || 125 Georgia || 88 || 86 || 85 || 86 Israel || 52 || 55 || 56 || 53 Jordan || 120 || 117 || 121 || 119 Lebanon || 116 || 118 || 122 || 123 Libya || N/A || N/A || N/A || N/A Republic of Moldova || 34 || 39 || 45 || 52 Morocco || 127 || 129 || 129 || 129 Palestine || N/A || N/A || N/A || N/A Syria || 124 || 124 || 132 || 133 Tunisia || N/A || N/A || N/A || N/A Ukraine || 63 || 64 || 64 || 64 Source: Gender Gap Report 2012, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2012.pdf Gender Gap Report 2013, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2013.pdf 4. Other indicators 4.1 UNDP Human Development Index (2012) The Human Development Index is a summary measure for assessing long-term progress in three basic dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge and a decent standard of living. It ranges from 0 to 1, with the higher-scoring countries being "developed" and the lower ones being "developing" or "undeveloped". Ranking (1-187) HDI Human development category Algeria || 93 || 0.713 || High || Armenia || 87 || 0.729 || High || Azerbaijan || 82 || 0.734 || High || Belarus || 50 || 0.793 || High || Egypt || 112 || 0.662 || Medium || Georgia || 72 || 0.745 || High || Israel || 16 || 0.900 || Very high || Jordan || 100 || 0.700 || Medium || Lebanon || 72 || 0.745 || High || Libya || 64 || 0.769 || High || Republic of Moldova || 113 || 0.660 || Medium || Morocco || 130 || 0.591 || Medium || Palestine || 110 || 0.670 || Medium || Syria || 116 || 0.648 || Medium || Tunisia || 94 || 0.712 || High || Ukraine || 78 || 0.740 || High || Source: UNDP, "Human Development Report 2013", http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/ 4.2 Global Peace Index Ranking (2012-2013) The Global Peace Index (GPI) comprises more than 20 indicators of the existence or absence violence or fear of violence (measures on on-going domestic and international conflict, safety and security in society, militarisation). The indicators were originally selected with the assistance of an international panel of independent experts in 2007 and have been reviewed by the expert panel on an annual basis. 2012 2013 Rank (1-158) Score Rank (1-162) Score Algeria || 121 || 2.255 || 119 || 2.284 Armenia || 115 || 2.238 || 98 || 2.123 Azerbaijan || 132 || 2.360 || 126 || 2.350 Belarus || 109 || 2.208 || 96 || 2.117 Egypt || 111 || 2.220 || 113 || 2.258 Georgia || 141 || 2.541 || 139 || 2.511 Israel || 150 || 2.842 || 150 || 2.730 Jordan || 62 || 1.905 || 52 || 1.858 Lebanon || 136 || 2.459 || 142 || 2.575 Libya || 147 || 2.830 || 145 || 2.604 Republic of Moldova || 68 || 1.927 || 74 || 1.984 Morocco || 54 || 1.867 || 57 || 1.897 Palestine || N/A || N/A || N/A || N/A Syria || 147 || 2.830 || 160 || 3.393 Tunisia || 72 || 1.955 || 77 || 2.005 Ukraine || 71 || 1.953 || 111 || 2.238 Source: 2012 report: / http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/2012-Global-Peace-Index-Report.pdf 2013 report: http://www.visionofhumanity.org/pdf/gpi/2013_Global_Peace_Index_Report.pdf 4.3 Ranking of Happiness (2010-2012) It assembles the available international happiness data on how people rate both their emotions and their lives as a whole, so it aims to measure subjective well-being. The ranking is based on each country’s average answers to Gallup World Poll question WP16, where respondents are asked to evaluate the current state of their lives, using the image of a ladder, with the best possible life for them as a 10 and the worst possible life as a zero. 2010 - 2012 || || Rank (1-156) || Algeria || || 73 (5.422) || Armenia || || 128 (4.316) || Azerbaijan || || 116 (4.604) || Belarus || || 66 (5.504) || Egypt || || 130 (4.273) || Georgia || || 134 (4.187) || Israel || || 11 (7.301) || Jordan || || 74 (5.414) || Lebanon || || 97 (4.931) || Libya || || 78 (5.340) || Republic of Moldova || || 53 (5.791) || Morocco || || 99 (4.885) || Palestine || || 113 (4.700) || Syria || || 148 (3.892) || Tunisia || || 104 (4.826) || Ukraine || || 87 (5.057) || Source: World Happiness Report 2013, http://unsdsn.org/files/2013/09/WorldHappinessReport2013_online.pdf 4.4 World Bank’s “Doing Business 2014” Ranking Economies are ranked on their ease of doing business, from 1-189 (2013). A high ranking on the ease of doing business index means the regulatory environment is more conducive to the starting and operation of a local firm. This index averages the country's percentile rankings on 10 topics, made up of a variety of indicators, giving equal weight to each topic. The 2014 rankings for all economies are benchmarked to June 2013. Rank 2012 (2013)* Rank 2013 (2014) Change in rating Algeria || 151 || 153 || -2 || Armenia || 40 || 37 || +3 || Azerbaijan || 71 || 70 || +1 || Belarus || 64 || 63 || +1 || Egypt || 127 || 128 || -1 || Georgia || 9 || 8 || +1 || Israel || 33 || 35 || -2 || Jordan || 119 || 119 || 0 || Lebanon || 105 || 111 || -6 || Libya || 188 || 187 || +1 || Republic of Moldova || 86 || 78 || +8 || Morocco || 95 || 87 || +8 || Palestine || 145 || 138 || +7 || Syria || 147 || 165 || -18 || Tunisia || 49 || 51 || -2 || Ukraine || 140 || 112 || +28 || *Last year's rankings are adjusted: they are based on 10 topics and reflect data corrections. Source: http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings 4.5 Global Competitiveness Index (2012 – 2014) The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014 assesses the competitiveness landscape of 148 economies, providing insight into the drivers of their productivity and prosperity. || Rank 2012-2013 || Rank 2013-2014 || Change in rating Algeria || 110 || 100 || +10 Armenia || 82 || 79 || +3 Azerbaijan || 46 || 39 || +7 Belarus || N/A || N/A || N/A Egypt || 107 || 118 || -11 Georgia || 77 || 72 || +5 Israel || 26 || 27 || -1 Jordan || 64 || 68 || -4 Lebanon || 91 || 103 || -12 Libya || 113 || 108 || +5 Republic of Moldova || 87 || 89 || -2 Morocco || 70 || 77 || -7 Palestine || N/A || N/A || N/A Syria || N/A || N/A || N/A Tunisia || N/A || 83 || N/A Ukraine || 73 || 84 || +11 Source: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2013-14/GCR_Rankings_2013-14.pdf Section II: Macroeconomic indicators 1. Basic data || Population (1000) || Population under 15 (% of total population) || Population over 65 % of total population) || Population, annual average growth rates || || || 2000 (1) || 2013 (2) || 2000 (1) || 2013 (2) || 2000 (1) || 2013 (2) || 2000 (1) to 2013 (2) (%) || || Algeria || 30 415 || 37 495 || 33.7 || 27.8 || 4.6 || 5.5 || 1.8 || || Armenia || 3 227 || 3 027 || 24.7 || 18.8 || 9.0 || 10.6 || -0.5 || || Azerbaijan || 8 033 || 9 357 || 31.7 || 22.3 || 5.2 || 5.8 || 1.2 || || Belarus || 10 003 || 9 464 || 19.0 || 15.4 || 13.3 || 13.8 || -0.4 || || Egypt || 63 255 || 84 629 || 35.4 || 30.9 || 3.6 || 4.5 || 2.3 || || Georgia || 4 435e || 4 484 || 21.3 || 17.0 || 12.4 || 13.9 || 0.1 || || Israel || 6 289 || 7 911 || 28.6 || 28.2 || 9.8 || 10.3 || 1.9 || || Jordan || 4 738 || 6 388 || 41.4 || 37.3 || 2.6 || 3.2 || 2.5 || || Lebanon || 3 755 || 3 780 || 27.2 || 23.0 || 7.5 || 10.4 || 0.1 || || Libya || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || || Republic of Moldova || 3 644 || 3 559 || 23.8 || 16.1 || 9.4 || 9.9 || -0.2 || || Morocco || 28 466e || 32 950 || 30.7 || 26.2 || 5.5 || 6.0 || 1.1 || || Palestine || 3 053 || 4 421 || 47 || 40.1 || 3.5 || 3.0 || 2.9 || || Syria || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || || Tunisia || 9 564 || 10 871 || 29.9 || 23.5 || 6.3 || 7.1 || 1.0 || || Ukraine || 49 115 || 45 453 || 17.9 || 14.4 || 13.9 || 15.2 || -0.6 || || Source: Eurostat, based on data supplied by the national statistical offices of the countries 1) Lebanon, 2004. 2) Algeria, Israel, Jordan, Ukraine, 2012; Lebanon, 2011. || || n/a = not available / e = estimated value || 2. Real GDP Growth Rate (%) || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Algeria || 2.4 || 1.6 || 3.6 || 2.8 || 3.3 || 2.7f Armenia || 6.9 || -14.1 || 2.2 || 4.7 || 7.2 || 3.2e* Azerbaijan || 10.8 || 9.3 || 5.0 || 0.1 || 2.2 || 5.8e Belarus || 10.2 || 0.2 || 7.7 || 5.5 || 1.5p || 0.9e Egypt || 7.2 || 4.7 || 5.1 || 1.8 || 2.2* || 2.1e Georgia || 2.3 || -3.8 || 6.3 || 7.2 || 6.1p || 3.1e Israel || 4.5 || 1.2 || 5.7 || 4.6 || 3.4 || 3.4e Jordan || 7.2 || 2.3 || 3.1 || 2.6 || 2.7p || 3.3e Lebanon || 8.6 || 9.0 || 7.0 || 2.0 || 2.5f || 1.5f Libya || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a Republic of Moldova || 7.8 || -6.0 || 7.1 || 6.8 || -0.8p || 5.5f Morocco || 5.6 || 4.9 || 3.6 || 5.0p || 2.7 || 4.5e Palestine || 7.1 || 7.4 || 9.3 || 12.2e || 5.9 || 14.5e Syria || 4.5 || 5.9 || 3.4 || n/a || n/a || n/a Tunisia || 4.5 || 3.1 || 3.2 || -1.9 || 3.6 || 2.7e Ukraine || 2.3 || -14.8 || 4.1 || 5.2 || 0.2 || -0.0e Source: Eurostat, based on data supplied by the national statistical offices of the countries; IMF; national authorities; * indicates European Commission staff estimates Note: Egypt’s fiscal year runs from July to June p=provisional / f=forecast / e=estimate / n/a = not available 3. Inflation rate, average (%) || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Algeria || 4.9 || 5.7 || 3.9 || 4.5 || 8.9 || 5.0f Armenia || 9.0 || 3.4 || 8.2 || 7.7 || 2.5 || 5.8* Azerbaijan || 20.8 || 1.5 || 5.7 || 7.9 || 1.1 || 2.4 Belarus || 14.8 || 13.0 || 7.8 || 53.2 || 59.2 || 18.3 Egypt || 18.3 || 11.8 || 11.1 || 10.1 || 7.1 || 9.5 Georgia || 10.0 || 1.7 || 7.1 || 8.5 || -0.9 || -0.5 Israel || 3.8 || 3.9 || 2.7 || 2.2 || 1.6 || 1.8f Jordan || 13.9 || -0.7 || 5.0 || 4.4 || 4.8 || 5.5f Lebanon || 5.5 || 3.4 || 4.6 || 3.1 || 10.1 || 6.3f Libya || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a Republic of Moldova || 12.7 || 0.0 || 7.4 || 7.6 || 4.6 || 5.2 Morocco || 3.9 || 1.0 || 0.9 || 0.9 || 1.3 || 1.9 Palestine || 9.9 || 2.8 || 3.7 || 2.9 || 2.8 || 1.7 Syria || 15.1 || 2.8 || 4.4 || n/a || n/a || n/a Tunisia || 4.9 || 3.5 || 4.4 || 3.5 || 5.6 || 6.1 Ukraine || 25.2 || 15.9 || 9.4 || 8.0 || 0.6 || -0.3 Source: Eurostat, based on data supplied by the national statistical authorities; IMF; national authorities; *indicates European Commission staff estimates f= forecast / n/a = not available 4. GDP per capita (in EUR) || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2013** Algeria || 3,366 || 2,793 || 3,359 || 3,859 || 4,136 || 4,360* Armenia1 || 2,451 || 1,909 || 2,142 || 2,415 || 2,560 || 2,444 Azerbaijan || 3,805 || 3,596 || 4,472 || 5,233 || 5,824 || 6,148 Belarus || 4,472 || 3,629 || 4,325 || 4,455 || 5.170p || 5,582 Egypt || 1,497 || 1,802 || 2,087 || 2,060 || 1,940 || 1,841 Georgia || 1,989 || 1,760 || 1,978 || 2,321 || 2,737p || 2,679 Israel || 19,807 || 19,807 || 23,073 || 23,910 || 25,366 || 26,251 Jordan || 2,551 || 3,019 || 3,396 || 3,318 || 3,805p || 3,982 Lebanon || 5,300 || 6,643 || 7,166 || 7,080 || 8,025 || 8,063 Republic of Moldova2 || 1,152 || 1,091 || 1,230 || 1,415 || 1,586 || 1,667 Morocco || 1,947 || 2,066 || 2,151 || 2,217p || 2,297 || 2,375* Palestine || 1,181 || 1,301 || 1,649 || 1,788e || 1,972 || 1,980 Syria || 1,739 || 1,833 || 2,117 || n/a || n/a || n/a Tunisia || 2,966 || 2,983 || 3,171 || 3,097 || 3,295 || 2,947 Ukraine || 2,663 || 1,828 || 2,245 || 2,574 || 3,018 || 2,908 Source: Eurostat, based on data supplied by the national statistical authorities; IMF; national authorities *indicates European Commission staff estimates; ECB for exchange rates **figures for 2013 are projections p=provisional / e=estimate / n/a = not available 1) [2000 - 2010] - Estimated using the GDP in euro and average annual population data. [2011 - 2012] - Calculated on the basis of 2011 population census results (average annual data). 2) Estimated using the GDP in euro and the average population without Transnistria. [2006] - GDP per capita in euro is 756.9 (the annual average number of population without Transnistria is 3585.2 ths.pers.) 5. Unemployment rate (% of labour force) || Unemployment rate || Unemployment rate – 2012 (5) 2008 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2013** || Male || Female || youth Algeria || 11.3 || 10.2 || 10.0 || 10.0 || 9.9 || 9.8 || 8.4 || 17.2 || 22.4 Armenia1 || 16.4b || 18.7 || 19.0 || 18.4 || 17.3 || 16.2 || 16.5 || 18.2 || 35.4 Azerbaijan || 5.9 || 5.7 || 5.6 || 5.4 || 5.2 || 6.0 || 4.3 || 6.1 || 14.2 Belarus2 || 0.9 || 0.9 || 0.8 || 0.7 || 0.6 || 0.5a || 0.6 || 0.6 || n/a Egypt || 8.7 || 9.2 || 9.0 || 12.0 || 12.3 || 13.4 || 8.9 || 22.7 || 29.7 Georgia || 16.5 || 16.9 || 16.3 || 15.1 || 15.0 || 16.7 || 16.1 || 13.8 || 33.3 Israel3 || 6.2 || 7.7 || 6.8 || 5.7 || 6.9 || 6.4 || 6.9 || 7.1 || n/a Jordan || 13.1 || 12.9 || 12.5 || 12.9 || 12.2 || 12.7 || 10.4 || 19.9 || n/a Lebanon || n/a || 6.4 || n/a || 10.0 || n/a || 20.0* || 7.8 || 14.9 || 18.7 Libya || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a Republic of Moldova || 4.0 || 6.4 || 7.4 || 6.7 || 5.6 || 6.2 || 6.8 || 4.3 || 13.1 Morocco || 9.6 || 9.1 || 9.1 || 8.9 || 9.0 || 8.9 || 8.7 || 9.9 || 18.6 Palestine || 26.9 || 24.7 || 23.9 || 21.1 || 23.2 || 24.5a || 20.7 || 33.3 || 38.8 Syria || 10.9 || 8.1 || 8.6 || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a Tunisia || 14.2 || 13.3 || 13.0 || 18.3 || 17.6 || 15.9º || 14.6 || 25.6 || 37.6 Ukraine4 || 6.4 || 8.8 || 8.1 || 7.9 || 7.5 || 8.0 || 8.5 || 6.4 || 17.3 Source: Eurostat, based on data supplied by the national statistical authorities; IMF; national authorities; *World Bank; ºILO; **figures for 2013 are projections / b = break in series / a = actual 1) Break in series due to methodological changes. The ILO standard definition of unemployment is used from 2008.[2008 - 2012] - Data are related to the persons aged 15-75.[2009, 2010] - As of whole year. Survey results have been weighted. 2) Belstat does not calculate the unemployment figures in accordance with the ILO standards. It takes into account only the share of unemployed registered in employment institutions compared to the general number of economically active population and not the total number of unemployed which includes the persons who are also job seekers. Gallup survey estimates the unemployment figure to be 40 times higher – around 24% (data for 2012, source: ILO). 3) As of 2012, the data refer to the entire labour force (including those who are in compulsory or permanent military service); see explanation in the introduction: http://www.cbs.gov.il/publications13/saka0313q/pdf/intro_e_e.pdf 4) Unemployment rates of the population aged 15-70. 5) Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, 2011 6. Employment rate || || || || || || || Note || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 || Algeria || || 39.4 || 40.1 || 40.4 || 39.1 || n/a || n/a || Armenia || || 51.7 || 49.6 || 51.4 || 53.3 || 53.7 || n/a || Azerbaijan || || 66.2 || 66 || 65.6 || 65.1 || 65.6 || n/a || Belarus1 || || 78.2 || 79.2 || 80.1 || 80.6 || 80.0 || n/a || Egypt || || 46.0 || 45.5 || 46.2 || 50.3 || n/a || n/a || Georgia || || 55.3 || 56.2 || 57.4 || 59.3 || 60.4 || n/a || Israel || || 59.8 || 59.2 || 60.1 || 60.8 || 66.3 || n/a || Jordan || || n/a || 87.1 || 87.5 || 87.1 || 87.8 || n/a || Lebanon || || n/a || 47.6 || n/a || 49.2 || n/a || n/a || Libya || || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || Republic of Moldova || || 47.0 || 44.6 || 43.0 || 43.8 || 42.7 || n/a || Morocco || || 47.4 || 47.0 || 46.8 || 46.9 || 46.1 || n/a || Palestine || || 31.4 || 32.6 || 32.6 || 35.2 || 34.8 || n/a || Syria || || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || Tunisia || || 43.1 || 43.1 || 43.7 || 41.4 || 42.5 || 43.3 || Ukraine || || 63.4 || 61.0 || 61.5 || 61.9 || 62.4 || n/a || Source: Eurostat, based on data supplied by the national statistical authorities 1) Share of employed population of all ages in the total population of working-age (men aged 16-59, women aged 16-54). Since 2005 population employed in the economy includes individuals who perform work under civil law contracts for whom this work was the only work. n/a = not available 7. Government debt and current account balance (% of GDP) || General government debt relative to GDP (%) || Current account balance relative to GDP (%) || || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2013** || Algeria || n/a || n/a || n/a || 20.1 || 0.3 || 7.5 || 8.9 || 6.3 || 1.1 || Armenia || 40.0 || 42.2 || 44.1 || -11.8 || -15.8 || -14.8 || -10.9 || -11.2 || -8.5* || Azerbaijan || 7.3 || 7.6 || 8.8 || 33.7 || 22.9 || 28.5 || 26.5 || 21.7 || 15.9 || Belarus || 36.9 || 23.3 || 23.1 || -8.7 || -13.0 || -15.2 || -7.2 || -3.0p || -9.4 || Egypt || n/a || n/a || n/a || 0.5 || -2.3 || -2.0 || -2.6 || -3.9 || -1.9a || Georgia || 33.8 || 32.4 || 31.7p || -21.9 || -10.5 || -10.2 || -12.7 || -11.5p || -6.5 || Israel || 70.0 || 68.5 || 66.9 || 1.4 || 3.8 || 3.1 || 1.3 || 0.3 || 0.6 || Jordan || 61.1 || 65.5 || 75.5 || -9.3 || -3.3 || -7.1 || -12.0 || -17.3 || -11.1 || Lebanon || 121.3 || n/a || n/a || -7.7 || -9.7 || -9.9 || -12.4 || -16.2 || -16.7 || Libya || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || Republic of Moldova || 26.8 || 23.6p || 24.4 || -16.1 || -8.2 || -7.7 || -11.3 || -7.0p || -7.6 || Morocco || 12.1 || 12.3 || 4.8 || -5.2 || -5.0 || -4.5 || -8.0 || -9.9 || -7.2a || Palestine1 || n/a || n/a || n/a || -13.4 || -11.9 || -10.3 || -23.5 || -28.0 || -22.4 || Syria || n/a || n/a || n/a || -1.3 || -2.9 || -2.8 || n/a || n/a || n/a || Tunisia || 40.2 || 44.3 || n/a || -3.8 || -2.8 || -4.7 || -7.3 || -8.2 || -8.2a || Ukraine || 39.9 || 36.3 || 36.6 || -7.0 || -1.5 || -2.2 || -6.3 || -8.1 || -8.9a || Source: Eurostat based on data supplied by the national statistical authorities; IMF; national authorities; *indicates European Commission staff estimates ** figures for 2013 are projections Note that Egypt’s fiscal year runs from July to June p = provisional / n/a = not available / a = actual 1) Including official transfers 8. Trade balance || (% of GDP) || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 Algeria || 22.2 || 19.3 || -0.6 || 7.0 || 10.0 || 9.5 Armenia || -20.9 || -26.1 || -28.8 || -30.0 || -27.5 || -28.5 Azerbaijan || 1.0 || 83.2 || 19.4 || 27.7 || 25.4 || 20.7 Belarus || -9.7 || -11.2 || -14.7 || -17.4 || -6.7 || -0.5 Egypt || -4.6 || -5.6 || -6.6 || -5.2 || -4.2p || n/a Georgia || -39.1 || -35.6 || -30.0 || -30.2 || -33.7 || -34.5 Israel || -0.9 || -0.7 || 2.8 || 1.7 || -0.5 || 0.2 Jordan || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a Lebanon || -24.8 || -30.2 || -23.5 || -25.6 || -28.0 || n/a Libya || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a Republic of Moldova || -53.2 || -54.6 || -36.7 || -39.8 || -42.4 || -42.1 Morocco || -9.2 || -13.4 || -11.0 || -9.9 || -13.1 || -14.2p Palestine || -58.1 || -50.0 || -51.8 || -41.7 || -43.6e || -46.8e Syria || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a Tunisia || -1.9 || -3.0 || -2.9 || -5.1 || -7.4 || -9.4p Ukraine || -7.9 || -10.2 || -4.9 || -6.8 || -8.7 || -9.1 Source: Eurostat based on data supplied by the national statistical authorities p = provisional n/a = not available e = estimated || || || || || || || Section III: The EU and the Partners 1. Main agreements in force with partners Main Agreeements || Association Agreements || Partnership and Co-operation Agreements || Action Plans or equivalent documents Algeria || 2005 || - || Under negotiation Armenia || Discussions to start on new legal basis to replace the current PCA || 1999 || Adoption date: 2006 Expiry date: The ENP Action Plan was rolled over in 2011. Azerbaijan || Negotiations began in 2010 || 1999 || Adoption date: 2006 Expiry date: no date Egypt || 2004 || - || Adoption date: 2007 Expiry date: 06.03.2012 (extended until 06.03.2015) Georgia || Initialled in 2013, signature expected summer 2014 || 1999 || Adoption date: 2006 Expiry date: to be replaced by Association Agenda (currently being negotiated) Israel || 2000 || - || Adoption date: 2005 Expiry date: 2008 (extended until 31 December 2013) Jordan || 2002 || - || Adoption date: 2012 Expiry date: 2017 Lebanon || 2006 || - || Adoption date: 01.01.2013 Expiry date: 31.12.2015 Libya || Negotiations of the EU – Libya Framework Agreement (equivalent of an Association Agreement) were suspended in February 2011. Currently exploratory talks are being held between the EU and the Libyan authorities in view of a possible re-launch of negotiations. || - || - Republic of Moldova || Initialled in 2013 || Signed in 1994 Entry into force: 1998 || Adoption date: 2005 Expiry date: upon entry into force of Association Agenda (Action Plan prolonged tacitly since 2008) Morocco || 2000 || - || Adoption date: 2013 Expiry date: 2017 Palestine || 1997: Interim Association Agreement (IAA) on trade and cooperation; 2005: Agreement on reciprocal liberalisation measures and the replacement of Protocols 1 and 2 to the IAA; 2012: Agreement providing further liberalisation of agricultural products, processed agricultural products and fish and fishery products and amending the IAA on trade and cooperation || - || Action Plans adopted in 2005 and 2013. Expiry date: in 3 – 5 years Syria || - || - || - Tunisia || 1998 || - || Adoption date: a political agreement has been reached on the text of the new Action Plan in November 2012 Expiry date: Ukraine || Initialled in 2012. In November 2013, the government of Ukraine decided on suspending preparations for signature of the Agreement || 1998 || Adoption date: EU-Ukraine Association Agenda, which is supposed to prepare for and to facilitate the entry into force of the Association Agreement, was endorsed in November 2009. Latest updated in June 2013. Expiry date: no date. Source: European External Action Service For a detailed list of the agreements between the UE and the partners on sector policies consult the agreements database of the European Council: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/policies/agreements/search-the-agreements-database?command=party&letter=U&doclang=EN&lang=en 2. Trade flows 2.1. EU trade with partners (million EUR) || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 (Jan-Aug) || 2013 (Jan-Aug) || EU Imports || EU Exports || EU Imports || EU Exports || EU Imports || EU Exports || EU Imports || EU Exports || Trade balance Algeria || 21,075.3 || 15,595.2 || 27,849.6 || 17,311.7 || 32,764.3 || 21,124.0 || 24,024.5 || 16,594.9 || -7,429.6 Armenia || 259.9 || 556.5 || 322.1 || 644.5 || 274.2 || 682.1 || 189.1 || 521.6 || 332.5 Azerbaijan || 10,045.3 || 2,348.3 || 15,461.5 || 2,882.7 || 14,283.5 || 2,988.5 || 10,697.6 || 2,766.2 || -7,931.4 Belarus || 2,672.0 || 6,631.2 || 4,337.2 || 7,229.2 || 4,591.7 || 7,838.2 || 2,643.0 || 5,619.0 || 2,976.0 Egypt || 7,244.4 || 15,056.1 || 9,602.8 || 14,126.6 || 8,510.8 || 15,536.5 || 5,846.0 || 10,847.1 || 5,001.1 Georgia || 567.4 || 1,227.5 || 614.5 || 1,609.3 || 583.7 || 2,068.8 || 474.2 || 1,527.2 || 1,053.0 Israel || 11,142.7 || 14,526.4 || 12,769.7 || 16,893.0 || 12,708.0 || 17,052.2 || 9,147.7 || 12,435.2 || 3,287.5 Jordan || 249.3 || 2,790.2 || 314.3 || 3,265.9 || 334.7 || 3,448.8 || 284.8 || 2,827.9 || 2,543.1 Lebanon || 330.2 || 4,964.3 || 411.6 || 5,294.0 || 375.5 || 6,737.1 || 229.3 || 5,029.4 || 4,800.1 Libya || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a Republic of Moldova || 585.4 || 1,562.7 || 847.1 || 1,862.2 || 943.8 || 2,036.6 || 661.7 || 1,638.2 || 976.5 Morocco || 7,775.3 || 13,776.5 || 8,873.4 || 15,407.0 || 9,325.3 || 16,943.5 || 7,460.1 || 13,036.6 || 5,576.5 Palestine || 34.7 || 79.8 || 12.4 || 87.6 || 15.8 || 103.0 || 8.7 || 76.3 || 67.6 Syria || 3,599.8 || 3,730.9 || 3,215.7 || 3,039.1 || 274.0 || 1,183.6 || 100.6 || 488.5 || 387.9 Tunisia || 9,553.8 || 11,135.5 || 9,910.2 || 11,109.8 || 9,528.1 || 11,208.3 || 7,013.3 || 8,514.1 || 1,500.8 Ukraine || 11,520.8 || 17,412.5 || 15,152.3 || 21,283.1 || 14,642.4 || 23,858.6 || 10,171.5 || 17,580.4 || 7,408.9 EU trade with ENP countries || 86,656.3 || 111,393.6 || 109,694.4 || 122,045.7 || 109,155.8 || 132,809.8 || 78,952.1 || 99,502.6 || 20,550.5 || || || || || || || || || Source: Eurostat, (COMEXT database). || || || || || || || || Based on data reported by EU 28 countries. Trade balance = Exports minus Imports n/a = not available || || || || || || || || || || || || || || 2.2. Share of EU in ENP trade || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || EU share of total Partner Country imports (%) || EU share of total Partner Country exports (%) || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 Algeria || 53.0 || 51.2 || 52.2 || 52.3 || 51.7 || 49.1 || 50.8 || 55.2 Armenia || 26.4 || 25.6 || 26.0 || 23.8 || 45.3 || 49.6 || 46.0 || 39.3 Azerbaijan || 26.7 || 25.4 || 32.4 || 27.7 || 45.0 || 51.2 || 60.9 || 48.4 Belarus || 23.0 || 21.7 || 18.9 || 20.0 || 43.7 || 30.2 || 37.9 || 38.0 Egypt || 33.0 || 32.4 || 29.3 || 29.5 || 28.2 || 29.9 || 30.7 || 27.9 Georgia || 28.4 || 28.2 || 29.1 || 31.0 || 20.6 || 18.5 || 19.4 || 14.9 Israel || 32.4 || 48.6 || 34.6 || 30.3 || 26.0 || 30.5 || 27.7 || 27.1 Jordan || 21.1 || 20.0 || 20.6 || 17.5 || 3.0 || 3.7 || 4.7 || n/a Lebanon || 38.5 || 36.1 || 36.3 || 39.1 || 13.0 || 18.1 || 11.9 || 9.9 Libya || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a Republic of Moldova || 43.4 || 44.3 || 43.5 || 44.5 || 52.0 || 47.3 || 48.9 || 46.9 Morocco || 52.4 || 49.2 || 48.3 || 46.4 || 66.2 || 59.9 || 57.6 || 57.4 Palestine || 9.7 || 9.3 || 10.5 || 10.0 || 0.9 || 1.3 || 1.5 || 1.8 Syria || 17.9 || 25.3 || n/a || n/a || 32.9 || 40.5 || n/a || n/a Tunisia || 62.8 || 61.2 || 57.7 || 53.5 || 73.8 || 73.3 || 76.4 || 71.4 Ukraine || 34.0 || 31.5 || 31.2 || 31.0 || 24.0 || 25.5 || 26.3 || 24.9 || || || || || || || || Source: Eurostat n/a = not available 2.3. EU trade with the world (2012 – Oct 2013) EU-28 trade with the world, 2012 || Southern ENP countries || Eastern ENP countries || China || US || Russia || Rest of the world Trade weight (EUR million) (1) || 167,173.5 || 74,792.1 || 435,490.6 || 498,934.4 || 337,867.2 || 1,963,575.7 % of total EU trade || 4.8 || 2.2 || 12.5 || 14.3 || 9.7 || 56.5 EU-28 trade with the world (Jan – Oct 2013) || Southern ENP countries || Eastern ENP countries || China || US || Russia || Rest of the world Trade weight (EUR million) (1) || 167,173.5 || 74,792.1 || 435,490.6 || 498,934.4 || 337,867.2 || 1,963,575.7 % of total EU trade || 4.8 || 2.2 || 12.5 || 14.3 || 9.7 || 56.5 (1) Trade weight is the sum of import and exports 2.4. Breakdown of Southern ENP Partners' trade with the EU (2012-Oct 2013) Southern ENP partners' trade with the EU, 2012 || Algeria || Egypt || Israel || Libya || Jordan || Lebanon || Morocco || Palestine || Syria || Tunisia Trade weight (EUR million) || 53,888.3 || 24,047.3 || 29,760.2 || || 3,783.5 || 7,112.6 || 26,268.8 || 118.8 || 1,457.6 || 20,736.4 ENP-South trade with EU as % of total trade || 32.2 || 14.4 || 17.8 || || 2.3 || 4.3 || 15.7 || 0.1 || 0.9 || 12.4 Southern ENP partners' trade with the EU (Jan-Oct 2013) || Algeria || Egypt || Israel || Libya || Jordan || Lebanon || Morocco || Palestine || Syria || Tunisia Trade weight (EUR million) || 45 045 || 18 611 || 24 046 || 28 452 || 3 487 || 5 868 || 22 808 || 105 || 663 || 17 217 ENP-South trade with EU as % of total trade || 27.1 || 11.2 || 14.5 || 17.1 || 2.1 || 3.5 || 13.7 || 0.1 || 0.4 || 10.4 || || || || || 2.5. Breakdown of Eastern ENP Partners' trade with the EU (2012-Oct 2013) Eastern ENP partners' trade with the EU 2012 || Armenia || Azerbaijan || Belarus || Georgia || Republic of Moldova || Ukraine Trade weight (EUR million) || 956.3 || 17,272.0 || 12,429.9 || 2,652.5 || 2,980.4 || 38,501.0 ENP-East trade with EU as % of total trade || 1.3 || 23.1 || 16.6 || 3.5 || 4.0 || 51.5 Eastern ENP partners' trade with the EU (Jan-Oct 2013) || Armenia || Azerbaijan || Belarus || Georgia || Republic of Moldova || Ukraine Trade weight (EUR million) || 825 || 15 005 || 10 032 || 2 277 || 2 637 || 31 222 ENP-East trade with EU as % of total trade || 1.3 || 24.2 || 16.2 || 3.7 || 4.3 || 50.4 Source: Eurostat (COMEXT database) 3. Participation of Neighbourhood countries in FP7 (2007 – January 2014) FP7 Specific Programme || COOPERATION || CAPACITIES || Signed agreements* || Proposals || Main listed || Proposals || Main listed Algeria || 138 || 25 || 53 || 13 || 29 Armenia || 100 || 15 || 52 || 17 || 32 Azerbaijan || 66 || 10 || 46 || 10 || 21 Belarus || 153 || 20 || 71 || 13 || 37 Egypt || 498 || 67 || 127 || 30 || 95 Georgia || 139 || 25 || 82 || 20 || 45 Israel || - || - || - || - || - Jordan || 143 || 15 || 73 || 26 || 36 Lebanon || 129 || 13 || 45 || 11 || 19 Libya || 20 || 3 || 20 || 2 || 2 Republic of Moldova || 129 || 16 || 57 || 16 || 33 Morocco || 386 || 76 || 104 || 25 || 95 Palestine || 59 || 8 || 29 || 10 || 20 Syria || 53 || 12 || 24 || 5 || 14 Tunisia || 341 || 65 || 101 || 28 || 84 Ukraine || 619 || 101 || 162 || 28 || 131 TOTAL || 1206 || 187 || 470 || 104 || 693 FP7 is the short name for the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. This is the EU's main instrument for funding research in Europe for the period from 2007 to 2013. FP7 is also designed to respond to Europe’s employment needs and competitiveness. FP7 supports research in selected priority areas - the aim being to make, or keep, the EU as a world leader in those sectors. FP7 is made up of 4 main blocks of activities forming 4 specific programmes plus a fifth specific programme on nuclear research: cooperation (collaborative research); ideas (European Research Council); people (human potential, Marie Curie actions); capacities (research capacities); nuclear research and training. Some of these programmes count significant cooperation with Neighbourhood partners. *Number of signed grant agreements in FP7 with participants from Neighbourhood countries by partner country Source: European Commission 4. Schengen visas issued by partner in 2012* || Short -stay visas (C) issued || Of which multiple entry Visas (MEV C) Algeria || 280,416 || 96,131 Armenia || 35,780 || 6,276 Azerbaijan || 49,867 || 9,432 Belarus || 693,425 || 326,482 Egypt || 120,896 || 40,819 Georgia || 59,363 || 18,362 Israel || 11,335 || 2,252 Jordan || 34,616 || 9,440 Lebanon || 85,501 || 35,070 Libya || 45,022 || 23,465 Republic of Moldova || 48,615 || 12,984 Morocco || 322,094 || 133,837 Palestine || 2,516 || 423 Syria || 3,343 || 1,612 Tunisia || 110,085 || 41,180 Ukraine || 1,283,014 || 494,749 NB: Citizens of all the ENP partners (except Israel) are required to hold a visa to enter the Schengen area. The data for Israel may include visas issued to Palestinians, as most Schengen consulates dealing with Palestinian applications are located in Israel. *No figures available for 2013 at the time of writing Source: European Commission 5. European Integration Index for Eastern Partnership countries, Open Societies Foundations / Renaissance Foundation European integration is assessed through three dimensions: Ø Linkage: growing political, economic and social ties between each of the six Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries and the EU; Ø Approximation: structures and institutions in EaP countries converging towards EU standards and in line with EU requirements; Ø Management: evolving management structures for European integration in EaP countries. Benchmarks were defined by assigning 1 to the best and 0 to the worst possible performance. || Linkage || Approximation || Management || 2012 || 2013 || 2012 || 2013 || 2012 || 2013 Armenia || 0.48 || 0.49 || 0.56 || 0.59 || 0.43 || 0.51 Azerbaijan || 0.38 || 0.41 || 0.42 || 0.42 || 0.34 || 0.33▼ Belarus || 0.31 || 0.31 || 0.31 || 0.33 || 0.19 || 0.24 Georgia || 0.54 || 0.57 || 0.58 || 0.63 || 0.58 || 0.58 Republic of Moldova || 0.70 || 0.70 || 0.65 || 0.67 || 0.57 || 0.59 Ukraine || 0.67 || 0.65▼ || 0.55 || 0.58 || 0.52 || 0.52 *The Index does not cover the situation in the break-away territories of Transnistria, Nagorno-Karabakh, Southern Ossetia and Abkhazia Source: http://www.eap-index.eu/sites/default/files/EaP_Index_2013_0.pdf Section IV: EU financial support to Partners 1. Commitments amounts under ENPI || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 || Total || Average Algeria || 57 || 32.5 || 35.6 || 59 || 58 || 74 || 50 || 366.1 || 52.3 Armenia || 21 || 24 || 24.7 || 27.7 || 43.1 || 35 || 66 || 241.5 || 34.5 Azerbaijan || 19 || 22 || 20 || 7 || 31 || 19.5 || 25 || 143.5 || 20.5 Belarus || 6 || 5 || 10 || 10 || 17.1 || 22.3 || 23.8 || 94.2 || 13.5 Egypt || 137 || 149 || 140 || 192 || 92 || 250 || 47 || 1007 || 143.9 Georgia || 24 || 90.3 || 70.9 || 37.2 || 50.7 || 82 || 97 || 452.1 || 64.6 Israel || 2 || 2 || 1.5 || 2 || 2 || 2 || 2 || 13.5 || 1.9 Jordan || 62 || 65 || 68 || 70 || 116 || 1201 || 881 || 589 || 84.1 Lebanon || 50 || 50 || 43 || 44 || 33 || 922 || 762 || 388 || 55.4 Libya || 2 || 4 || 0 || 12 || 10 || 25 || 30 || 83 || 11.9 Republic of Moldova || 40 || 62.3 || 57 || 66 || 78.6 || 122 || 135 || 560.9 || 80.1 Morocco || 190 || 228.7 || 145 || 158.9 || 166.6 || 207 || 334.9 || 1431.1 || 204.4 Palestine || 447.7 || 382 || 352.6 || 367.9 || 413.7 || 224 || 313.7 || 2501.6 || 357.4 Syria || 20 || 20 || 40 || 50 || 10 || 48.4 || 170 || 358.4 || 51.2 Tunisia || 103 || 73 || 77 || 77 || 180 || 130 || 135 || 775 || 110.7 Ukraine || 142 || 138.6 || 116 || 126 || 65 || 149 || 199 || 935.6 || 133.7 Total || 1322.7 || 1348.4 || 1201.3 || 1306.7 || 1366.8 || 1602.2 || 1792.4 || 9940.5 || 1420 Regional || Regional/interregional cooperation East || 62 || 38 || 40 || 84.25 || 99.14 || 90.64 || 122.87 || 536.9 || 76.7 Regional/interregional cooperation South || 97.4 || 89 || 99* || 99.4 || 104.6 || 114.2* || 118.2 || 721.8 || 103.1 Total || 159.4 || 127 || 139 || 183.65 || 203.64 || 204.84 || 241.07 || 1258.7 || 179.8 || || || || || || || || || Cross Border Cooperation ENPI || || || || || || || || 947.2 || || || || || || || || || || Grand Total || || || || || || || || 12146.4 (EUR Million) ( 1 ) Not including special measures to support Syrian refugees in Jordan: EUR 20.85M committed in 2012 and EUR 51.6M in 2013; those commitments are included in the figures for Syria ( 2 ) Not including measures to support Syrian refugees in Lebanon: EUR 15M committed in 2012 and EUR 67M in 2013; those are included in the figures for Syria *Excluding amounts for EP preparatory actions (EUR 2 M in 2009 and EUR 1.5 M in 2012). Source: European Commission 2. ENPI – Cross Border Cooperation (allocations 2007 – 2013) The ENPI Cross Border Cooperation (CBC) programmes have four key objectives: - promoting economic and social development in regions on both sides of common borders; - working together to address common challenges, in fields such as the environment, public health and the prevention of and the fight against organised crime; - ensuring efficient and secure borders; - promoting local cross border 'people-to-people' actions. CBC programmes are co-funded from the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) and from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). The CBC Indicative Programme 2007-2010 allocated EUR 583 million (EUR 275 million from the ENPI and EUR 308 million from the ERDF). Following the mid-term review, a second CBC Indicative Programme allocated further EUR 538 million for the period 2011-2013 (EUR 260 million from the ENPI and EUR 278 million from the ERDF). CBC programmes || Commitments (2007-2013) || Disbursements (end 2013) Land Border Programmes || || Kolarctic/Russia (Finland, Sweden, Russia, Norway) || 30,471,018 || 20,121,835 Karelia/Russia (Finland, Russia) || 23,202,507 || 18,071,149 SE Finland/Russia (Finland, Russia) || 36,185,361 || 23,324,933 Estonia/Latvia/Russia || 47,774,729 || 30,169,542 Latvia/Lithuania/Belarus || 41,736,666 || 21,631,189 Lithuania/ Poland /Russia || 124,212,272 || 78,213,772 Poland/Belarus/Ukraine || 186,201,367 || 109,335,338 Hungary/Slovakia/Romania/Ukraine || 68,638,283 || 49,455,275 Romania/ Ukraine/Rep. of Moldova || 126,718,066 || 77,563,018 Sea-Crossing Programmes || || Italy/Tunisia || 25,191,423 || 18,065,500 Sea-Basin Programmes || || Black Sea (Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Ukraine, Rep. of Moldova, Georgia, Armenia) || 28,118,954 || 19,771,382 Baltic Sea Region (Belarus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Sweden) || 8,800,000 || 8,800,000 Mediterranean (Cyprus Egypt, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Palestinian Authority, Portugal, Spain, Syria, Tunisia || 200,000,000 || 92,147,421 TOTAL || 947,250,646 || 566,670,354 Source: European Commission The figure for the 'Baltic Sea Region' CBC programme is adjusted to de-commitment following Russia's non signature of the Financing Agreement 3. Fiches covering EU financial support by partner (2007 – 2013) ALGERIA 1) ENPI allocations Under the National Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Algeria, EUR 220 million was programmed for the following priorities of which EUR 184.1 million was committed. Priority || Planned || Actual Reform of Justice || 7.7% || 9.2% Economic growth and employment || 51.4% || 54.6% Reinforcement of basic public services || 40.9% || 36.2% Algeria || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 57 || 55 || 54 || 54 Committed || 57 || 32.5 || 35.6 || 59 Disbursed || 51.3 || 46.1 || 47.9 || 28.1 (EUR Million) Under the National Indicative Programme 2011-2013 for Algeria, EUR 172 million was programmed for the following priorities. Priority || Planned || Actual* Sustainable development and culture || +/-43% || 52.6% Economic growth and development || +/-57% || 47.4% *This does not take into account the amount allocated through the SPRING programme Algeria || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 54 || 58 || 60 Committed || 58 || 74 || 50 Disbursed || 42.9 || 30.3 || 37.3 (EUR Million) Additional EUR 10 million was allocated to Algeria from the SPRING programme to support governance. 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments Other instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || 400,000 || 600,000 || 400,000 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 600,000 || 900,000 || 700,000 Neighbourhood Investment Facility || n/a || n/a || n/a Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || 400,000 || 500,000 || 400,000 Migration and asylum[1] || n/a || 1,875,000 || n/a (EUR) n/a = not available Source: European Commission ARMENIA 1) ENPI allocations A total of EUR 97.40 million of ENPI funding was committed for Armenia under the National Indicative Programme (NIP) 2007-2010 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Support for strengthening of democratic structures and good governance || 30% || 30% Support for regulatory reform and administrative capacity building || 30% || 34% Support for poverty reduction efforts || 40 % || 36% Armenia || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 21 || 24 || 24.7 || 28.7 Committed || 21 || 24 || 24.7 || 27.7 Disbursed || 10.90 || 7 || 17.5 || 15.8 (EUR Million) A total of EUR 114.10 million of ENPI funding was committed during the period 2011-2013. Out of this total, EUR 104.10 million was provided under the NIP 2011-2013 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Democratic structures and good governance || 30-35% || 47% Trade and investment regulatory alignment and reform || 20-25% || 19% Socio-economic reform and sustainable development || 40-45 % || 34% *The NIP 2011-2013 integrates funding for the Eastern Partnership bilateral programmes on Comprehensive Institution Building (CIB) and regional development (PRDP). *Actual percentages adjusted to commitments. Additional allocations of EUR 40 million were granted to Armenia under the EaPIC programme (Eastern Partnership Integration and Cooperation) in 2012 and 2013. EaPIC funds were allocated to continue support for the justice system reform; civil service modernisation and the fight against corruption; better mobility and border management; and vocational education and training. During the period 2008-2013, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF) contributed a total of EUR 67.1 million for nine projects in Armenia. Armenia || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 43.1 || 60 || 54 Committed AAPs || 43.1 || 20 || 41 EaPIC || n/a || 15 || 25 Disbursed || 27.2 || 25.5 || 25.7 *Figures adjusted to the de-commitment of EUR 40 million following non-signature of two Financing Agreements linked to support for DCFTA implementation *Disbursements include country-specific payments for regional and inter-regional programmes (such as NIF) 2) Allocations under other instruments In addition to ENPI funding, support is provided also under other instruments such as the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), the thematic programme 'Non-state actors and local authorities' (NSA/LA) of the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), and the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC). Other instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || 1.9 || 1 || 1 European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 0.9 || 0.9 || 0.9 Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) - Development Cooperation Instrument || 0.65 || 0.6 || 0.7 (EUR Million) Source: European Commission AZERBAIJAN 1) ENPI allocations A total of EUR 68 million of ENPI funding was committed for Azerbaijan under the National Indicative Programme (NIP) 2007-2010 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Support for democratic development and good governance || 33% || 43% Support for socio-economic reform, fight against poverty and administrative capacity building || 34% || 29% Support for legislative and economic reforms in the transport, energy and environment sectors || 33% || 28% Azerbaijan || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 19 || 22 || 24 || 27 Committed || 19 || 22 || 20 || 7 Disbursed || 3.7 || 6.5 || 5.1 || 11.3 (EUR Million) A total of EUR 75.5 million of ENPI funding was committed for Azerbaijan under the NIP 2011-2013 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Democratic structures and good governance || 25-30% || 9% Socio-economic reform and sustainable development, trade and investment, regulatory approximation and reform || 35-40% || 57% PCA and ENP AP implementation, including energy security, mobility and security || 30-35% || 34% *The NIP 2011-2013 integrates funding for the Eastern Partnership bilateral programmes on Comprehensive Institution Building (CIB) and regional development (PRDP) *Actual percentages adjusted to commitments. Azerbaijan did not benefit from the EaPIC programme (Eastern Partnership Integration and Cooperation). During the period 2008-2013, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF) contributed a total of EUR 3.4 million for one project in Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 28 || 42 || 25 Committed || 31 || 19.5 || 25 Disbursed || 15.2 || 18.7 || 8.6 [*]Figures are adjusted to the reduction of the NIP 2011-2013 from the initially planned amount of EUR 122.5 million [*]Disbursements include country-specific payments for regional and inter-regional programmes (such as NIF) 2) Allocations under other instruments In addition to ENPI funding, support is provided also under other instruments such as the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), the thematic programme 'Non-state actors and local authorities' (NSA/LA) of the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), and the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC). Other instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || n/a || 0.9 || 0.9 Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) - Development Cooperation Instrument || n/a || 0.7 || n/a (EUR Million) Source: European Commission BELARUS 1) ENPI allocations A total of EUR 48.10 million of ENPI funding was committed for Belarus during the period 2007-2011. Out of this total, EUR 44.10 million was provided under the National Indicative Programme (NIP) 2007-2011 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Support for social and economic development || 70% || 78% Democratic development and good governance || 30% || 22% An additional allocation of EUR 4 million was granted under a 'Special Measure' in support of civil society in 2011. Belarus || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 || 2011 Programmed || 5 || 5 || 10 || 10 || 16.07 Committed AAPs || 6 || 5 || 10 || 10 || 13.10 Special Measure || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || 4 Disbursed || 0.6 || 3 || 2.7 || 5.1 || 1.1 (EUR Million) The initial NIP 2007-2010 was extended by one year (2007-2011) A total of EUR 46.10 million of ENPI funding was committed for Belarus during the period 2012-2013. Out of this total, EUR 28.60 million was provided under the NIP 2012-2013 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Good governance and people-to-people contacts || 50% || 17% Economic modernisation || 50% || 83% While the reduced NIP allocation was mainly devoted to economic modernisation, additional allocations of EUR 17.5 million were granted under two 'Special Measures' in support of civil society and people-to-people contacts in 2012 and 2013. This means that 49% of the total ENPI funding for Belarus over the period 2012-2013 was specifically devoted to activities in support of civil society. Belarus did not benefit from the EaPIC programme (Eastern Partnership Integration and Cooperation). During the period 2008-2013, there was no Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF) project in Belarus. Belarus || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 17 || 11.5 Committed AAPs || 17 || 11.6 Special Measures || 5.3 || 12.2 Disbursed || 9.3 || 15.7 (EUR Million) 2) Allocations under other instruments In addition to ENPI funding, support is provided also under other instruments such as the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), the thematic programme 'Non-state actors and local authorities' (NSA/LA) of the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), and the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC). Other instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || 4.5 European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.56 Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) - Development Cooperation Instrument || 2.4 || 0.2 || 1.4 (EUR Million) Source: European Commission EGYPT 1) ENPI allocations Under the National Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Egypt, EUR 558 million was programmed but EUR 618 million was committed for the following priorities. Priority || Planned || Actual Support for reform in democracy, human rights and justice || 7% || 6.7% Developing competitiveness and productivity of the Egyptian economy || 40% || 44.8% Ensuring sustainability of the development process with better management of human and natural resources || 53% || 48.9% Egypt || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 137 || 139 || 140 || 142 Committed || 137 || 149 || 140 || 192 Disbursed* || 170.3 || 148.1 || 151 || 106.2 (EUR Million) *including country specific interregional NIF payments Under the National Indicative Programme 2011-2013 for Egypt, EUR 449.3 million was programmed for the following priorities. Priority || Planned || Actual Support for reform in democracy, human rights and justice || 11.1% || 0% Competitiveness and productivity of the Egyptian economy || 42.2% || 43.1% Support for socio economic reform and sustainable development || 46.7% || 56.9% Egypt || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 144 || 150 || 155.3 Committed || 92 || 250 || 47 Disbursed* || 39.1 || 93.2 || 28.2 (EUR million) *including country specific interregional NIF payments Additional EUR 90 million was allocated to Egypt from the SPRING programme to support socio-economic development and civil society. 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments: Other instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || 600,000 || 900,000 || 1,200,000 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 2,000,000 || 1,780,000 || 1,000,000 Neighbourhood Investment Facility || 23,500,000 || 50,000,000 || 15,000,000 Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || 1,000,000 || 760,000 || 1,000,000 Instrument for Stability (IfS) || 4,000,000 || 260,000 || n/a Migration and asylum[2] || n/a || 2,000,000 || n/a (EUR) Source: European Commission GEORGIA 1) ENPI allocations A total of EUR 222.4 million of ENPI funding was committed for Georgia during the period 2007-2010. Out of this total, EUR 117.4 million was provided under the National Indicative Programme (NIP) 2007-2010 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Support for democratic development, rule of law and governance || 26% || 37% Support for economic development and ENP Action Plan implementation || 26% || 26% Poverty reduction and social reforms || 32% || 29% Support for peaceful settlement of Georgia's internal conflicts || 16% || 8% In the aftermath of the 2008 crisis, additional allocations of EUR 105 million were granted to Georgia under two 'Special Measures' in 2008 and 2009 to support the implementation of national action plans on Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs). Georgia || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 24 || 28.8 || 30.4 || 37.2 Committed || 24 || 28.8 || 27.4 || 37.2 Special Measures || n/a || 61.5 || 43.5 || n/a Disbursed* || 14.7 || 32.7 || 69 || 41.7 (EUR Million) A total of EUR 229.7 million of ENPI funding was committed for Georgia during the period 2011-2013. Out of this total, EUR 180.7 million was provided under the NIP 2011-2013 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Support for democratic development, rule of law, good governance || 25-35% || 22% Support for trade and investment, regulatory alignment and reform || 15-25% || 27% Support for regional development, sustainable economic and social development, poverty reduction || 35-45% || 49% Support for peaceful settlement of conflicts || 5-10% || 2% *The NIP 2011-2013 integrates funding for the Eastern Partnership bilateral programmes on Comprehensive Institution Building (CIB) and regional development (PRDP) Additional allocations of EUR 49 million were granted to Georgia under the EaPIC programme (Eastern Partnership Integration and Cooperation) in 2012 and 2013. EaPIC funds were allocated to continued support for reforms of the criminal justice system and human rights protection; better mobility and border management; modernisation of employment policies and the vocational education and training system. During the period 2008-2013, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF) contributed a total of EUR 63.9 million for nine projects in Georgia. Georgia || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 50.7 || 61.8 || 67.7 Committed AAPs || 50.7 || 60 || 70 EaPIC || n/a || 22 || 27 Disbursed* || 66.3 || 61.2 || 47.6 (EUR million) *Disbursements include country-specific payments for regional and inter-regional programmes (such as NIF) *The 2013 EaPIC allocation is partly funded with 2012 commitments 2) Allocations under other instruments In addition to ENPI funding, support is provided also under other instruments such as the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), the thematic programme 'Non-state actors and local authorities' (NSA/LA) of the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), and the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC). Other instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 1.2 || 1.2 || 1 Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) - Development Cooperation Instrument || 0.4 || 0.7 || 0.4 (EUR Million) Source: European Commission ISRAEL I) ENPI allocations Under the National Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Israel, EUR 8 million was programmed for the following priorities of which EUR 7.5 million was committed. Priority || Planned || Actual Support for implementation of the joint priorities in the EU-Israel Action Plan || 100% || 100% Israel || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 2 || 2 || 2 || 2 Committed || 2 || 2 || 1.5 || 2 Disbursed* || 2.8 || 2.7 || 2.5 || 3.5 Under the National Indicative Programme 2011-2013 for Israel, EUR 6 million was programmed for the following priority. Priority || Planned || Actual Support for implementation of the joint priorities in the EU-Israel Action Plan || 100% || 100% Israel || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 2 || 2 || 2 Committed || 2 || 2 || 2 Disbursed* || 4.5 || 3.5 || 3.6 (EUR million) 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments: Other Instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || 500,000 || 500,000 || 500,000 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 1,200,000 || 1,200,000 || 1,200,000 Neighbourhood Investment Facility || n/a || n/a || n/a Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || n/a || 300,000 || n/a Investing In People / Gender || 248,000 || n/a || n/a (EUR) Source: European Commission JORDAN 1) ENPI allocations Under the National Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Jordan, EUR 265 million was programmed for the following priorities. Priority || Planned || Actual Political reform, human rights, justice and cooperation on security and fight against extremism || 6.5% || 6.4% Trade and investment development || 29.5% || 23.8% Sustainability of the growth process || 24.0% || 20.8% Institution building, finance and public administration reform || 40.0% || 49.1% Jordan || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 62 || 65 || 68 || 70 Committed || 62 || 65 || 68 || 70 Disbursed || 46.1 || 63.6 || 49 || 92 (EUR Million) Under the National Indicative Programme 2011-2013 for Jordan, EUR 223 million was programmed for the following priorities. Priority || Planned || Actual* Supporting Jordan's reform in democracy, human rights, media, justice || 20.2% || 34.1% Trade enterprise and investment development || 17.9% || 9% Sustainability of the growth process || 41.7% || 45.7% Support in the implementation of the Action Plan || 20.2% || 11.2% *This does not take into account the amount allocated through the SPRING programme Jordan || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 71 || 75 || 77 Committed || 116 || 120* || 88* Disbursed || 76.3 || 91.6 || 96 (EUR Million) *not including special measures to support Syrian refugees in Jordan: EUR 20.848M committed in 2012, and EUR 51.6 M committed in 2013; those commitments are included in the fiche for Syria Additional EUR 101 million was allocated to Jordan from the SPRING programme: Priority || Amount Education reform || 10 Support to electoral system || 7 Justice preparatory project || 3 Support to enterprise and export development || 10 Good governance and development contract || 55 Support to host communities || 16 (EUR Million) 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments: Other Instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || 300,000 || n/a || 500,000 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 900,000 || 900,000 || 900,000 Neighbourhood Investment Facility || n/a || n/a || n/a Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || 200,000 || 450,000 || n/a Instrument for Stability (IfS)* || n/a || 2,900,000 || 20,000,000 (EUR) *In the context of the response to the Syria crisis Source: European Commission LEBANON 1) ENPI allocations Under the National Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Lebanon, EUR 187 million was programmed for the following priorities. Priority || Planned || Actual Support to political reform || 11.76% || 11.76% Support to social and economic reform || 45.99% || 45.99% Support to reconstruction and recovery || 42.25% || 42.25% Lebanon || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 50 || 50 || 43 || 44 Committed || 50 || 50 || 43 || 44 Disbursed || 32.6 || 43.5 || 24.6 || 26.1 (EUR Million) Under the National Indicative Programme 2011-2013, EUR 150 million was programmed for the following priorities. Priority || Planned || Actual* Support to political reform || 16.7% || 11.76% Support to socio-economic reforms || 60.7% || 45.99% Recovery and re-invigoration of the economy || 22.6% || 42.25% *This does not take into account the amount allocated through the SPRING programme Lebanon || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 45 || 50 || 55 Committed || 33 || 92* || 76* Disbursed || 14.1 || 29.3 || 79,3 (EUR Million) *not including measures to support Syrian refugees in Lebanon: EUR 15M committed in 2012 and EUR 67M in 2013; those commitments are included in the fiche for Syria Additional EUR 51 million was allocated to Lebanon from the SPRING programme: Priority || Amount Reinforcing Human Rights and Democracy || 10 Top-up support Security and Rule of Law || 4 Top-up support to Reform of the Judiciary || 4 Support to Electoral Reform || 6 Infrastructure for Palestine Refugees || 6 Solid Waste Management Capacities (SWAM) || 14 Recovery of Local Economies (crisis affected communities) || 7 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments: Other Instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || n/a || 500,000 || 500,000 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 600,000 || 600,000 || 600,000 Neighbourhood Investment Facility || n/a || 10,000,000 || n/a Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || 350,000 || 350,000 || 300,000 Instrument for Stability (IfS)* || n/a || 15,000,000 || 32,000,000 (EUR) *EUR 27.6 M of the total amounts is in the context of the response to the Syria crisis Source: European Commission LIBYA 1) ENPI allocations There was no NIP for the period 2007-2010 in Libya. A total of EUR 8 million under ENPI was earmarked for the Benghazi Action Plan (BAP) on HIV/AIDS and funds were committed as special measures. An additional EUR 10 million was committed in 2010 as a special measure in the field of migration. Special measure || Planned || Actual BAP : HIV/Aids || n/a || 44.4% Migration || n/a || 55.6% Libya || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed: BAP || 2 || 2 || 2 || 2 Programmed: Migration || 2 || 4 || 0 || 12 Committed: overall || 0 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 0.6 (EUR Million) The NIP 2011-2013 with an overall budget of EUR 60 million was signed with the Libyan government in June 2010 including two focal areas: (i) Improving the quality of human capital; (ii) Sustainability of economic and social development. A revised version of the NIP 2011-2013 was signed on 30 August 2012. The country allocations were reoriented towards the most urgent needs caused by the armed conflict and the subsequent transitional period in the following areas: Priority || Planned || Actual* Support to the transition process || 37.6% || 37.6% Improving the quality of human capital || 29% || 29% Increasing the sustainability of economic and social development || 16.7% || 16.7% Addressing jointly the challenge of managing migration || 16.7% || 16.7% *This does not take into account the amount allocated through the SPRING programme Libya || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 10 || 25 || 25 Committed || 10 || 25 || 30 Disbursed || 8 || 2.9 || 7.7 (EUR Million) Additional EUR 5 million was allocated to Libya from the SPRING programme. Priority || Amount Support to Civil society and Media || 3 Support to the Constitutional Process || 2 (EUR Million) 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments: Other Instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || n/a || 600,000 || 600,000 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a Instrument for Stability (IfS) || 3,700,000 || 13,400,000 || 1,700,000 Humanitarian Aid || 80,500,000 || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 3,000,000 || 1,000,000 || 1,000,000 Neighbourhood Investment Facility || n/a || n/a || n/a Migration and asylum || 1,630,000 || 5,940,000* || n/a Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || 3,000,000 || 2,000,000 || 2,000,000 (EUR) *including EUR 4.5M regional programme covering Algeria, Egypt, Libya and Tunisia Source: European Commission REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 1) ENPI allocations A total of EUR 225.3 million of ENPI funding was committed for Moldova during the period 2007-2010. Out of this total, EUR 208.70 million was provided under the National Indicative Programme (NIP) 2007-2010 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Support for democratic development and good governance || 25-35% || 25% Support for regulatory reform and administrative capacity building || 15-20% || 19% Support for poverty reduction and economic growth || 40-60% || 56% An additional allocation of EUR 16.6 million was granted to Moldova under the Governance Facility in 2008. Moldova || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 40 || 45.7 || 57 || 67 Committed AAPs || 40 || 45.7 || 57 || 66 Governance Facility || n/a || 16.6 || n/a || n/a Disbursed || 8 || 23.7 || 66.1 || 56.6 (EUR Million) A total of EUR 335.6 million of ENPI funding was committed for Moldova during the period 2011-2013. Out of this total, EUR 272.6 million was provided under the NIP 2011-2013 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Good governance, rule of law and fundamental freedoms || 35-40% || 40% Social and human development || 25-30% || 17% Trade and sustainable development || 35-40% || 44% *The NIP 2011-2013 integrates funding for the Eastern Partnership bilateral programmes on Comprehensive Institution Building (CIB) and regional development (PRDP) Additional allocations of EUR 63 million were granted to Moldova under the EaPIC programme (Eastern Partnership Integration and Cooperation) in 2012 and 2013. EaPIC funds were allocated to continued support for the economic development of rural areas; promotion of energy efficiency; justice system reform, protection of human rights and fight against corruption; modernisation of the health system. During the period 2008-2013, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF) contributed a total of EUR 103.47 million for 15 projects in Moldova. Moldova || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 78.6 || 94 || 100.5 Committed AAPs || 78.6 || 94 || 100 EaPIC || n/a || 28 || 35 Disbursed || 79.3 || 53.1 || 65 (EUR million) *Disbursements include country-specific payments for regional and inter-regional programmes (such as NIF) 2) Allocations under other instruments In addition to ENPI funding, support is provided also under other instruments such as the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), the thematic programme 'Non-state actors and local authorities' (NSA/LA) of the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), and the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC). Other instruments || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 1.2 || 1 || 1 Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) - Development Cooperation Instrument || 0.45 || 0.45 || n/a (EUR Million) Source: European Commission MOROCCO 1) ENPI allocations Under the National Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Morocco, EUR 654 million was programmed for the following priorities. Priority || Planned || Actual Social Sector || 45.3% || 44.6% Governance, human rights || 4.3% || 1.1% Institutional Support || 6.1% || 12.5% Economic sector || 36.7% || 35.1% Environmental sector || 7.6% || 6.7% Morocco || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 162 || 163 || 164 || 165 Committed || 190 || 228.7 || 145 || 158.9 Disbursed* || 227.5 || 224.9 || 200.7 || 170.1 (EUR Million) * included country specific interregional NIF payments Under the National Indicative Programme 2011-2013 for Morocco, an amount EUR 580.5 million was programmed in the following: Sector || Planned || Actual* Social || 20% || 31.9% Economic || 10% || 10.3% Institutional Support || 40% || 43.6% Governance human rights || 15% || 7.8% Environmental || 15% || 6.4% *This does not take into account the amount allocated through the SPRING programme Morocco || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 178.5 || 193.5 || 208.5 Committed || 166.6 || 207 || 334.9 Disbursed* || 151.5 || 110.1 || 84.1 (EUR Million) *including country specific interregional NIF payments Additional EUR 128 million was allocated to Morocco from the SPRING programme. This amount was allocated as follows: Programme || Amount Support to National Council and Inter-Ministerial Delegation of Human Rights || 2.9 Support to SMEs and job creation || 40 Agricultural Strategy Council || 16.1 Literacy programme || 35 Top up of Support to Health sector reform programme || 12 Top-up Hakama || 9 Support to the Moroccan Parliament || 3 Support to the implementation of the Mobility Partnership || 10 (EUR Million) 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments: || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || 1,400,000 || 200,000 || 200,000 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 1,200,000 || 1,000,000 || 1,200,000 Neighbourhood Investment Facility || 37,000,000 || 15,000,000 || 15,000,000 Migration and asylum || 873,300 || 1,594,264 || 5,000,000 Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || 750,000 || 750,000 || 0 (EUR) Source: European Commission PALESTINE 1) Financial allocations (BL 19.080.102) There is no NIP for the Occupied Palestinian Territory and each year ad hoc measures were adopted to respond to the needs of this country. Under the period 2007-2010, EUR 1,550.2 million was committed for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Direct & Indirect Financial Support for PA || n/a || 61.0% Institution-building || n/a || 3.5% Infrastructure Development || n/a || 4.5% Private Sector Development || n/a || 2% Support to UNRWA || n/a || 29% East Jerusalem initiatives || n/a || 0.9% Palestine || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 158 || 158 || 158 || 158 Committed || 447.7 || 382 || 352.6 || 367.9 Disbursed || 381.4 || 425.9 || 327.8 || 325.5 (EUR Million) Under the period 2011-2013, EUR 951.4 million was committed for the following priorities. Priority || Planned || Actual Direct & Indirect Financial Support to PA || n/a || 51.8% Support to UNRWA || n/a || 28.6% Institution Building || n/a || 7.1% Infrastructure Development || n/a || 5.6% East Jerusalem initiatives || n/a || 2.5% Private Sector Development || n/a || 4.4% Palestine || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 158 || 168 || 178 Committed || 413.7 || 224 || 313.7 Disbursed* || 322.3 || 264.7 || 305.5 (EUR Million) *Of which EUR 100 million have been committed on 2011 credits 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments: || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || 400,000 || 500,000 || 900,000 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 1,500,000 || 1,500,000 || 1,500,000 Neighbourhood Investment Facility || n/a || n/a || n/a Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || 2,400,000 || 2,400,000 || 2,400,000 Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) (regional South Programme) || 5,000,000 || 5,000,000 || 5,000,000 Investing in people / Gender || 380,000 || 3,190,000 || n/a Instrument for Stability (IfS) || 8,890,000 || 4,110,000 || n/a (EUR) Source: European Commission SYRIA - SUSPENDED - 1) ENPI allocations Under the National Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Syria, EUR 130 million was programmed for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Support to political and administrative reform || 23% || 23% Support for economic reform || 46% || 38.5% Support for social reform || 23% || 30.8% Environment / sustainable energy || 8% || 7,7% Syria || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 20 || 20 || 40 || 50 Committed || 20 || 20 || 40 || 50 Disbursed || 34.1 || 26.5 || 31.2 || 18.4 (EUR Million) Under the National Indicative Programme 2011-2013 for Syria, EUR 129 million was programmed for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Support for political and administrative reform || 19% || n/a Support for economic reform || 44% || n/a Support for social reforms || 37% || n/a However, due to the ongoing repression in Syria, the bilateral cooperation under ENPI and NIP 2011-2013 was suspended on 25th May 2011. A special measure for 2011 (EUR 10 million) was adopted to support two UNRWA projects targeting both Palestinian refugees and the Syrian population. Two special measures were adopted in 2012 (EUR 48.4 million in total) to support the population in Syria as well as Syrian refugees in Jordan and Lebanon and various special measures were adopted in 2013 (EUR 170M) for the same purpose[3]. Syria || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 41.67 || 42.67 || 44.67 Committed || 10 || 48.4* || 170** Disbursed* || 18.8 || 1.8[4] || 29.6[5] (EUR Million) *including measures to support Syrian refugees in Jordan (EUR 20.848M) and Lebanon (EUR 15M) and Syrian population affected by the crisis (EUR 12.6 M). **including measures to support Syrian refugees and host communities in Jordan (EUR 51.56M), Lebanon (EUR 67M) and Syrian population affected by the crisis (EUR 51M). 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments: || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || n/a || n/a || n/a Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || n/a || 2,000,000 || 6,000,000[6] Neighbourhood Investment Facility || n/a || n/a || n/a Investing In People / Gender || 408.000 || n/a || n/a Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || 250,000 || 0 || 0 Instrument for Stability (IfS) || n/a || 14,770,000 || 12,400,000 (EUR) Source: European Commission TUNISIA 1) ENPI allocations Under the National Indicative Programme 2007-2010 for Tunisia, EUR 300 million was programmed for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Economic governance, competitiveness and convergence with the EU || 60% || 41% Improvement of graduate employability, support to the employment system, support to less favoured areas || 21.7% || 21.7% Sustainable development || 18.3% || 37.3% Tunisia || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 73 || 73 || 77 || 77 Committed || 103 || 73 || 77 || 77 Disbursed || 97.9 || 56 || 74.4 || 68.5 (EUR Million) Under the National Indicative Programme 2011-2013 for Tunisia EUR 240 million were initially programmed. However, in the immediate aftermath of the revolution, the NIP 2011 – 2013 was reviewed and additional amount of EUR 50 million was allocated to Tunisia. The priorities in the NIP were the following: Priorities || Planned || Actual* Employment and social protection || 20-27% || 17.5% Integration support programme II || 35-38% || 0% Governance and justice || 6-8% || 0% Business competitiveness (industry and services) || 32-35% || 85.5% *This includes the additional EUR 50 M allocated after the NIP review but does not take into account the amount allocated through the SPRING programme. Tunisia || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 80 || 80 || 80 Committed || 180 || 130 || 135 Disbursed || 114.3 || 145.2 || 80.3 (EUR Million) Additional EUR 155 M was allocated to Tunisia from the SPRING programme. This amount was allocated as follows: Programme || Amount Top-up programmes of Economic Recovery (PAR 1 and 3) || 55 Support to the Association Agreement ant to the Transition (parts 1 and 2) || 25 Civil society capacity building programme || 7 Programme of support to the justice sector (PARJ) || 25 Programme of support to the integration of popular neighbourhoods (PPIQP) || 33 ENPARD || 10 (EUR Million) 2) Support to civil society / NIF / Support under thematic instruments: || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Civil Society Facility || 1,400,000 || 1,000,000 || n/a Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation || n/a || n/a || n/a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights || 5,200,000 || 1,000,000 || 1,000,000 Neighbourhood Investment Facility || 800,000 || n/a || 15,000,000 Non-state Actors and Local Authorities (NSA/LA) || 1,200,000 || 300,000 || n/a Instrument for Stability || 2,000,000 || 305,000 || n/a Migration and Asylum[7] || n/a || 1,445,293 || n/a (EUR) Source: European Commission UKRAINE 1) ENPI allocations A total of EUR 522.6 million of ENPI funding was committed for Ukraine under the National Indicative Programme (NIP) 2007-2010 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Support for democratic development and good governance || 30% || 7% Support for regulatory reform and administrative capacity building || 30% || 42% Support for infrastructure development || 40% || 51% Ukraine || 2007 || 2008 || 2009 || 2010 Programmed || 120 || 122 || 124 || 128 Committed || 142 || 138.6 || 116 || 126 Disbursed || 52.1 || 123.3 || 100.9 || 121.3 (EUR Million) A total of EUR 413 million of ENPI funding was committed for Ukraine under the NIP 2011-2013 for the following priorities: Priority || Planned || Actual Good governance and the rule of law || 20-30% || 7% Facilitation of the entry into force of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement (including a DCFTA) || 25-35% || 32% Sustainable development || 45-55% || 61% *The NIP 2011-2013 integrates funding for the Eastern Partnership bilateral programmes on Comprehensive Institution Building (CIB) and regional development (PRDP) *Actual percentages adjusted to commitments Ukraine did not benefit from the EaPIC programme (Eastern Partnership Integration and Cooperation). During the period 2008-2013, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility contributed a total of EUR 23.7 million for six projects in Ukraine. Georgia || 2011 || 2012 || 2013 Programmed || 135 || 152.5 || 180.2 Committed || 65 || 149 || 199 Disbursed || 103.7 || 79.9 || 152.8 *Figures adjusted to the de-commitment of EUR 70 million following non-signature of a Financing Agreement linked to public administration reform *Disbursements include country-specific p