ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES
DELACOMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEEDES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM(80)540
Vol.1980/0175

Disclaimer
Conformément aurèglement (CEE, Euratom) n°354/83 duConseil du1erfévrier 1983
concernant l'ouverture aupublic desarchives historiques delaCommunauté économique
européenne etdelaCommunauté européenne del'énergie atomique (JOL43du15.2.1983,
p.1),telquemodifié par lerèglement (CE, Euratom) n°1700/2003 du22septembre 2003
(JOL243du27.9.2003, p.1),cedossier estouvert aupublic. Lecaséchéant, lesdocuments
classifiés présents dans cedossier ontétédéclassifiés conformément àl'article 5dudit
règlement.
Inaccordance with Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No354/83 of1February 1983
concerning theopening tothepublic ofthehistorical archives oftheEuropean Economic
Community andtheEuropean Atomic Energy Community (OJL43,15.2.1983, p.1),as
amended byRegulation (EC, Euratom) No1700/2003 of22September 2003 (OJL243,
27.9.2003, p.1),this fileisopen tothepublic. Where necessary, classified documents inthis
filehave been declassified inconformity with Article 5oftheaforementioned regulation.
InÜbereinstimmung mitderVerordnung (EWG, Euratom) Nr.354/83 desRates vom 1.
Februar 1983 über die Freigabe der historischen Archive der Europäischen
Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft undderEuropäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI. L43vom 15.2.1983,
S.1),geändert durch dieVerordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr.1700/2003 vom 22.September 2003
(ABI. L243vom 27.9.2003, S.1),istdiese Datei derÖffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit
erforderlich, wurden dieVerschlusssachen indieser Datei inÜbereinstimmung mitArtikel 5
dergenannten Verordnung freigegeben.

COMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEÀN COMMUNITIES
COM(80)540 final
Brussels ,26th September 1980
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TOTHE COUNCIL
GUIDELINES FOR THE REVIEW OFTHE COMMON ORGANIZATION
OFTHE MARKET INFISHERY PRODUCTIONS
(REGULATION (EEC )N°100/76OF16JANUARY 1976 )
r tr .VA/ ïa " v-'H
I o?-
a [~v'l^5sty% g J
•« s5 , - tzn
iD- ' 1-SJI
C0M(80 )540 final
n

S*£t*ffleèr 196Q
• /
'Communication fromtheCommission totheCouncil
Guidelines forthereviewofthecommonorganization ofthe
marketinfisheryproducts (Regulation (EEC)N°100/76of
16January 1976(1))
I.Introduction
! .It!II.'Mainchangessince1970inthemarketing offisheryproducts
,
III.Theobjectives ofthecommonorganization ofthemarket
» -
IV.Amendments tobemadetothemachinery ofthecommonorganization ofthe
market '* '?• •.
' – " "" - -V!'i' -
1.General '/i'f ,
2.Producers' organizations ...
3.Thesystemofpricesandintervention
4.Importarrangements r
(a)reference prices *
(b)customsduties •;;r
c•..
': ' 'I
V.Budgetary implications ;it!i,
./.
i1r
(1)O.J.N°L20of28January 1976.Regulation (EEC)N°100/76consolidate
Regulation (EEC)N°2142/70of20October1970.

Introduction
Thefishingindustry especially high-sea fishing,iscurrently facing
seriousfinancial difficulties .Theproblems resultmainlyfromthedwindling
ofstocks,changesinfishingconditions following t'hegeneralintroduction
of200-mile fishingzonesandtheconsiderable increase inthepriceoffuel,
whilethemarketforfisheryproducts hasbeenshowingdefinite signsof
weakness sincemid-1979 .
Apropersolution tothesector'sproblems cannotbeprovided byaidssuppor­
tingtheoperating sideoffishingorbyincreases intheofficial prices
forfisheryproducts,.Measures ofthiskindmerelyservetoputoffthetime
wherethefishingindustry willhavetoadapttocurrentandfutureconditions .
Onlyasetofmeasures including theestablishment ofastrictpolicyon
theconservation ofresources andady'namicstructural policy,whilstensuring
adequate operation ofthecommonorganisation ofthemarket,canbringa
solution . ";i■ ":
TheCommission hasalreadyputforwardproposals concerning policyon
resources andstructures .Initscommunication totheCouncil (doc.COM(80)
338finalof12June1980)theCommission stateditsintention toforward
proposals foradaptingtheorganization' ofthemarketinfisheryproducts
tothechangeswhichhadoccurred infishingconditions inrecentyears.
:|l;■ ■ -,•
Thiscommunication setsoutgeneralguidelines fortherequisite review.
TheCommission intendstosubmitformalproposals onthematterassoon
aspossible sothattheycanbeconsidered 'inconnection withthedecisions
,whichtheCouncilistoadoptinthefisheries sectorbeforetheendof
theyearinaccordance withitsdecision'bf30May1980.

Thecommonorganization ofthemarketintroduced in1970wasdesigned at
atimewhensalesoffreshproducts predominated .Since1970theshareof
totalproduction accounted forbyprocessed .andfrozenproducts has
increases sharply,reaching 35to40%in1979,andthistrendislikelyto
continue .Asaresult,Community fishermen havelostmuchofthenatural
advantage whichtheirfre^iproducts enjoyedontheCommunity marketsover
imported .fish.
Moreover,theprogressive dismantling ofcustomsdutieswhichwerean
obstacLe .to.theCommunity'smainsuppliers (Scandinavian andMediterranean
countries )has.reducedthepreference enjoyed byCommunity producers on
theCommunity market.Atpresentabout50%ofimportsoffisheryproducts
arechargeable ,inoneformoranother,atatarifflowerthantheCCT.
w.\Thegeneralintroduction ofthe200-milei.fishingzoneshasradically changed
theCommunity'ssupplysituation,which'currently showsanimportrequirement
'•h:' '•<ofabout1milliontCmainly whitefish)andanexportable syrplusofabout
600000t(mainlypelagicspecies),compared withproduction forhuman
'*-1.J
consumption ofabout3milliont. '(
Inrecentyearsintervention inthemarketshasincreased considerably and
maywellreachaquantity ofabout90.000tin1980.Thisintervention
buyingcoversspeciesofwhichtheCommunity hasasurplus as'wellasthose
forwhichithasneedofimports.Therrlodestfinancial compensation for
withdrawal meansthatfishermen getfarfromfullcompensation fortheir
work,thecostsofwhichcontinue torise.>
^ Ii'''ir ' ',.Thefutureapplication ofageneralized systemofcatchquotaswill
v'■'."increase theneedtoadjustmarketmechanisms soastobalancesupply
i it-' "anddemandasfaraspossible. ' '

Asaresultoftheincrease inimportstheformation oftheinternalprice,
particularly forwhite[fish,dependslargelyonthetradingpractices ■
ofnon-member countries . ,
Someofthem,nowhavinglargewell-stocked fishingzones,aremakinga
strongefforttogainafoothold inCommunity markets,oftenwiththe
helpofdirectorindirect subsidies . !, -
!i
Insodoingtheyareliabletoundermine theattempts oftheCommunity
producers' organizations tostabilize marketswithpricesfixedbythe
Community atalevelwhichisfairtobothproducers andconsumers inthe
Community .
III.Theobjectives ofthecommonorganization ofthemarket
, . iIS
Since1970theprincipal objectives ofth?commonorganisation ofthemarket
infisheryproducts havebeentoencourage rational marketing ofproduction ,
"toensuremarketstability "andthereby"assureproducers,asfaras
!i» ■"
possible,ofafairincome". !V
Themeasures implemented tothoseendswere"selected inthelightoflong
established commercial !practice inthisindustry andtakeaccountofthe
specialcharacteristics ofthemarketinfisheryproducts,e.g.dispersed
''!1H ■andwidelydiversesupply,markedfluctuations inproduction ,theperishable
natureoftheproducts andtherelativeinelasticity ofdemand.
Boththeobjectives andthemachinery ofthecommonorganization ofthemarket
arestillingeneral linewithneeds!!:„giventhecharacteristics of
themarketinfisheryproducts,itisnotpossible toenvisage aformof
marketorganisation fundamentally different fromthatchosenin1970.
! ' *'r! 'H
Theprovisions ofRegulation (EEC)N°100/76needtoberevised,however,
toensurethatunderpresentandfuture ,conditions asregardsfishing
andmarketing offisheryproducts,the6bjectives ofthecommonorganisation
ofthemarketcanbeachieved withthe^instruments available !
• r-.M
■ "• ■.'■ Il',,/ ■'
• •Ji'n A.
i. "»/*.- »♦
• 'n•
τ
,'t\. 'T.*
I

Infutureyearsthescopeforincreases inofficial priceswillremain
Limitedbecauseofcompetition fromotherprotein foods(pigmeat andpoultry-
meat)/thepricesofwhichhaveincreased Lessinrelative termsthanks
,'I-•tostrongerproductivity gains.Therewilltherefore beanevengreater
needthaninthepasttodoeverything possible tooptimize marketrevenue
bygreaterrationalization ofmarketing .Therationalization ofmarketing
willbeparticularly important inthenextfewyearsinviewofthe
generalproblemofavailability offisheries resources .
Theactiontobetakenunderthecommonorganization ofthemarketmustbe
./V
accompanied bygreaterdiscipline anddynamism inproducers "organizations
inthefieldofproduction andmarketing .■'
Iftheactiontakenbytheseorganizations isnottobecancelled outby
disturbance fromtheactivities ofotherproducers withinoroutside
theCommunity /.theprovisions governing thecommonorganization ofthe
marketwillhavetoprovidesufficient protection against suchdisturbance .
Amendments tobemadetothemachinery pfthecommonorganization ofthe
market . ,,
1.General H
Thereviewofthecommonorganization ofthemarketmustrelateinparticula
totheprovisions governing theinterventioiVsystem ,importarrangements
::':*s
andproducers 'sorganizations . i'
Theseprovisions areallcloselylinked,andanamendment tooneorthe
otheroftheminevitably entails changing theothers.
'!•>/ '•'Apartfromthesebasicinstruments ofthecommonorganization ofthe
market,otherprovisions shouldbeadapted,againinthelightofexperience
* '
gainedoverthetenyearsofimplementation ofthecommonorganization .
Theseincludethelistofproductseligible forintervention and
marketing standards . . fl'i

Thecommonorganization ofthemarketassigns 1acentralroletoproducers'
.1r ■
organizations intheday-to-dayrunningofthemarkets.
However,theproducers' organizations set'upunderRegulation (EEC)N°100/76
havenotalwaysbeenabletoplaythisroleproperly,eitherbecauseof
alevelofmembership whichistooloworbecausetheprovisions governing
theirintervention inthemarketweretopr;igid.
Inregionswherefewfishermen belongtoproducers' organizations ,the
:rI i'Ioperation oftheseorganizations isoftenseriously impeded .byoutsiders
- I
whotakeadvantage ofthemeasures takenby,,theorganizations toregulate
. :•:•>
themarketbuarenotobligedtoobservetherulesonproduction and
marketing laiddownforthosewhoaremembers.Similarproblems mayarise
whereafishermen landshiscatchinaportotherthanhishomeportand
inthecaseofdirectlanding byafisherman fromanon-member country.
Itisnotpossible toenvisage compulsory membership ofprdducers' organiza­
tions,butthesituation canbeimprovedL 'Farone'thing,thefinancial
! Jincentive tojoincanbeimproved byincreasing aidfortheformation of
organizations andthefinancial compensat\q>npaidtoorganizations in
respectofintervention onthemarket(seealsopointIV.3.below).
Secondly,thereisscope(provided for'in.Article 7ofRegulation (EEC);
η. - 11ι1
N°100/76)toallowaproducers' organization whichisconsidered tobe
''Π 1representative inagivenareaorporttoextenditspriceandproduction
■.'i!,•rulestootherfishermen landingwithinthesameareaorport.Adequate
^1measures wouldhavetobeadpptedtopreventthecreation ofdominant
positions contrary tothegeneralinterest.
» ■
1hnLastly,theproducers' organizations must .b^permitted tomodulatetheir
intervention inthemarketinthelight ;©f;themarketsituation prevailing
atthetime.ThiswillenablethemtoS^ryp-theirmembers 1^interests
betterthaninthepastandinducemoreproducers tojoin.

7.-
r
3-I!ie_s^stem_of_grices_and_intervention (
Guidepricesforfisheryproducts arebasednotonproduction costsbut
onaverages ofpricesrecorded duringthethreepreceding years.
Theythusreflectmarkettrendsandensure^omedegreeofmarketstability .
Sincetheguidepricesareessentially targetfigures,thereseemsnopoint
s•
inrevising themethodofcalculating themortheprocedure forfixingthem.
• ïI:»' . :--;
"''-'' il
Ontheotherhand,thesystemofwithdrawal priceshasprovedtoorigid
andrequires certainadjustments .Atpresentproducers' organizations are
Λrequired toobservethewithdrawal pricevalidforthewholeCommunity
JIi• r 1
throughout theyearorforgotheirentitlement tofinancial compensation
fromtheEAGGF. ^'- V
Thisprevents themfromreacting inthe.eyent offluctuation ofthemarket
(e.g.seasonal)thusavoidingundesirable withdrawals ..Theuniformwith­
drawalpricesalsofailtotakeaccount ..of(differences inconsumerattitudes
andconsequently inpricelevelsonthe;different marketsin,theCommunity .
Inordertoovercomethesedifficulties ;,aiid,createsomedegreeofflexibility
intheapplication oftheintervention :machinery/intervention pricescould
befixedintheformofabracketwithinvihichtheproducers' organizations
couldwithdraw fisheryproducts fromthemarketascircumstances ontheir
particular marketatthetimedictated .. •? ,
•'- /ι. '■' '■
1.1
Thelowleveloffinancial compensation graftedtoproducers' *organizations
inrespectofwithdrawals (about60%ofthewithdrawal price)isnotconsi­
deredanadequate incentive tofishermen ,,tojoinproducers 1organizations and
tocomplywiththeirproduction andmarketing rules. ;i
Asubstantial increase infinancial compensation ,however,wouldentailthe:
riskoffishermen "fishingfortheEAGGF".'
Asolution tothisdilemmacouldbesoughtintheintroduction ofratesof
financial compensation ,varyingaccording to;thequantities )withdrawn from
themarket.-. *–. !f'|.'i.■! ;
■•*•••'':■
π·,:II.
rm

Toreduceundesirable withdrawals further andavoidthedestruction of
fishofahighcommercial value,provision shouldbemadeforgranting
privatestorageaid.Thistypeofaid,whichalreadyexistsforcertain
frozenMediterranean fisheryproducts,shouldbeextendedtoallfishery
products forwhichtheamountofaidwouldbelessthanthatofthefinan­
cialcompensation payableintheeventofwithdrawal oftheproducts in
!l.■ *iquestion fromthemarket.
•. ιSimilarly,consideration couldbegiventothepossibility ofgranting
aidtothecanningindustry ihordertoimproveitslong-term ,
competitiveness .Thipcouldbeparticularly important fortheCommunity
sardineandanchovycannTngindustry,whichisexperiencing seriousdif­
ficulties,andwouldenableittoimproveitscompetitive position .
4.Importsarrangements '.1: 1 .
a)Reference prices ij
Importarrangements arenolongersatisfactory inthecurrentandfore­
seeablemarketsupplysituation .Regulation (EEC)No100/76provides for
reference pricesforimportsbelowwhichimports maybesuspended to
preventdisturbances . 1;
Thereference pricelevelshouldbethesameastheCommunity withdrawal
price.Thesuspension ofimports whe^ereference pricesareundercut is
r.tooabruptanddoesnottakesufficient accountoftheneedofthemarket
/>/ ?forregularsupplies,particularly ofproducts fortheprocessing industry .
Atthesametimetheconditions forsuspension aresuchthatsuspension
cannotbeimplemented inpracticeuntilthemarkethasalreadybeen
disturbed .
Moreover,wherethesuspension ofimportsisnotappliedorisapplied
late,importsfromnon-member countries ^regivenpreference asregards
salesonCommunity market's,tothe.disadvantage ofCommunity producers,
swhocannotselltheirproductsatlessthanthereference price
»
(=withdrawal price).
Moreflexible importarrangements featuring severalstagesofprotection
shouldtherefore beprovided for,toibe,implemented inaccordance with
pre-established criteria andbeforemarketdisturbance occurs.

Experience hasalso shown that better monitoring ofimport pric«is
f •i
needed -the List ofrepresentative markets andports should beamplified
and anumber ofproducts which have appeared ontheCommunity market in
recent years andwhich areexerting anincreasing influence onprices in
theCommunity should bebrought into thereference price system .
Inthepast fewyears reference prices andwithdrawal prices have started
todiverge /particularly forfrozen products .Ifthewithdrawal system
*. '' '
isrevised ,thereference prices will ,have tobeupdated andfixed ata
level corresponding asclosely aspossible tothelevel ofthewithdrawal
price ,having regard also totheneed tbensure that third country products
arenot sold atabnormal prices ontheCommunity market .
Theabovementioned adjustments will lead togreater harmony between the
import arrangements and theother instruments ofthe system and thus
strengther .the internal consistency ofthe common organization ofthe
market .
J ' ''»
b)Customs duties
i I
Thetariff concessions conceded inthepast bythe Community forfisheries
products either multi laterally orunder pi"efe£^n|ial agreements have
reduced Community preference tosuch al^evel /infuture extreme caution
will berequired .Further concessions £apnot becontemplated except in
exceptional cases oronly insofar as,adequate compensation canbe
obtained fortheCommunity 'sfishing industry .
Asregards theautonomous tariff reductions frequently made inyears of
inadequate supply andhghmarket prices ,jthese should infuture be
conceded only infully justified cases andprovided that nodisadvantage
results forCommunity producers .

Budgetary implications
EAGGFexpenditure onintervention inthefisheryproducts sectoris
relatively low(20million EUAin1979)foranindustry whichaccounts
forabout4%ofagricultural production .
Thesetofadjustments envisaged forthecommonorganization ofthe
. , 1
marketinfisheryproducts neednotnecessarily entailanincrease in
expenditure .
Theproposed higherratesoffinancial compensation forthewithdrawal of
products fromthemarketwillbegrantedonlywheretheproducers'
organizations improvetheirmanagement ofwithdrawals fromthemarket '
andwillthusapplytosmallerquantities .
Similarly,somespecialaidmeasures
willreplaceexpenditure whichwouldotherwise havebeennecessary to
compensate producers forthewithdrawal_of theproducts covered bythese
newaidmeasures. ;'
Itisnotpossibletoestimateatthisstagewithasufficient degreeof
accuracy howmuchanyadditional expenditure mightcometo.
AtalleventstheCommission willtakeaccountofbudgetary constraints
whendrawingupthedetailedprovision^ofitsformalproposals .

ListofTables r
I.Supplyoffisheryproducts intheEEC
\ r.■
II.EECexternal trade !,
■ii■' -
III.Maincountries exporting totheEEC
IV.Average'eECpricesin1976-79andpricemovementsin1980
V.Intervention intheEEC.r
•,t

s
SUPPLY OFFISHERY PRODUCTS INTHEEEC
i intonnes (production =weightLanded; '_
imports/exports =weightofproducts ) -t *· .
• '*' *
•· Í• 2 ·
*·* '
* v•*
••j*''·* *
';i
i
•t
1977 1978 1979Cten^e .in!
1977-79 i
Production 2.760.437
J.2.866.463
;2.818.446 *ΖΧ
i
Imports from
outside EEC862.084 939.549
t ·1.039.250
"ã·,>· ;'*9
♦21Χ
ê ^
Exportsto-,
non-EEC countries277.239 '
incl.51-565 mackerel511.629
.incl.-284.580mackerel ·668.612
incl.431.192mackerel"+4ΪΧ
t
Supply 3.345.282 . 3.294.383 3'.189.084«
i
-SΧί·
I.
SourcA^j OECD,Eurostat.- ·
f .'• ·
• Ν
•
•.·
X ·*,.♦
»·' φ
■»»
•
■.1- · V
*
9
!
I
?
I
i
•• «
Kv :i
•
•·
»»
•
.. !
•

EECexternal tradeandintra-Community trade 1 ANNEXII
byproduct group
,■■■·li
■ ι■j- . '" '–rrImportsfrom |Exportsto jNetimports |Intra-Community *
outsideEEC^jnonEECcountries|. *jtrade–I– ' ·- !
1C00tmioEUAj,1000tmioEUA.j1000t|mioEuA¡1000tjmioEUA
'Fish,fresh,chilledorv..
frozen
•
~ · *1977
1978
'¿/S507,7
550,5
teì*.'540
6151
180,7
4C8,0208
242 ,zn327,0
U2,5
>2,2332
.373490,0
530,6526
6C6
Fish,salted,dried,smoked
'orinbrine1977
197863,4
69,1
.■f*/H7.
12823,0
2.0,8
J9>-ν42
3935,4
43,3
Sh>75
;*89
-i*i44,9 f
47,6
f%3'65
74*
"\á*3*
c
•Crustaceans andjmolluscs,
freshorpreserved simply
•- ' ·' ·. "*·1977
1978
Ihn92,7
128,7
<(<?/,)>»177
259
Z$ï.
32,4
44,0s\O-
48
'·'·.51·:60,3
84,7129
2C3
¿3/106,2
111,5124
151'Jïr
Prepared orpreserved fish,.
caviar __-1■,\'TTrr..■·..*
•*·-"'·1977
1978160.4
151.5
■ití,i288
283
uc29,0
31,457
65
'Ά :131,4 '
120,1231
,223
-.¿S?60,2
57,7109
114
/33
'Molluscs ,prepared or
preserved1977
1978
'S7X37,9
39,7
M147
164
2017,1
7,4
¿á19
21
Z€>30,8
32,3
33,3123
■-14316,3
16,6
K',659
66
T?
Total * :·.
• ·
■··
» *
«■»··· .1977
1973
'SÌ5862,1
939,5
*¿>35,31.269
1.454277,2
511,6
ó374
418
m584,8
427*9
J79.-C895
,1.036
HXr718,1
?64,03S2
1.011
-¡m
Source:EUROSTAT,External trade,
micorfiches.-------'

ANW€X--î-îi~–
jav-o-l
EECimports1977-79bymainexportingcountries
Fish,fresh,ish,salted .
Chilledorcried,smokec
.frozen crinbriñe
Year 1coot:mEUA 1XO't liltUA
îetol 197707,75'.0'3,4-17
■Non-EEC 78 >50,5«15f9,1 2â
79'•07,1734 ,7<v*.145.
ofwhich:
•Japan''577if,5 18
0,0-
70 >'•,9Γ30
7911.5 10 0,00'
:Norway 1977ÍC.095 22.4.56·
7»βι,β 1831.¡S74
•7980,135.31,P76
•.
Spaia 2977 30.7 31 7,714
.1323,0 22 5,79
.·79
t28,230 6,2
•10
!MorocCO1977'4.6 4 --;
78*4.45 0,2•0
19 .8,29 0.30
líanadâ197761.9•
52 3.)5,
7»75.197 5.3 5
7966,4100 6,6 9
i··■
:USA 1977zr.,1il 0,?0
7830,373 0.1 0
7937,6101 0,10
IcelandW7 17,518 8,915
7841,7«,10,0 18
.79'5,ï54 13.9 Î4
»«
Swedeni?77Cl.fi,«
>1 0.1 0
7870,9.¡2 0.1 0
7987.9;3'0,1 0
■S.Africå?7711.4 8Κ0
781?,0 10h,o0
79?1.020 'Ίο,ο0*
Faroe1.1977 55.325 13.9 20
'7346.0Î4 10,6 15
7949,0 33 9.013
Argen-»19773M :·9 1.51
tina 7040,J30 0,40
7937,530 0,10Crust.
moll,fresho
orpres.simply
ko.-,tlmEUAFish,prep
o,r,près.,
vcaviar,1*101luses,.i
prepared * ,'
or'pres.simvlycaviarorprès. :
_icô7t|"m"eÛÂ-"ïwotmEUAlocotmEUA1000tmEUA
9?,7117160p4î8337,9^ .
1?S,7?59151,5»»32,71«4.939,51.15-'.
1-11,31?97M-3,63?645,9Hn10J9'3
2,9í»5,7350,i831,41
"<,J13 ;IM89K1137,7
4.»h.o :».**5o,ix!y.95«
3/6-5,9»\>.9I»>«•«
•1,35«.5«:M13^227
1,1>•J8,717'-.7 ««.*
13,95«,1114,2'662-5*7
19,0124,5103,975f,959
16/,9'3,69 S57>î C"'
'1,4 16.5«--i?'631
2,0517.4Î7"'0,0&24,0î7
0,04•11-9.1J1 073'545
1,87"I15.7402,314S-'.,51,r
4.412S«,5393.01310ril171
5,«1916,3393.9*5'S3t>-1?1•
2.554,91Cl',?«■3fi'456
j,668,324?,41744.7l?l
5,79U.9-39 1,7lû57,01*5
0,101,010,04j?3,339
0,511,7»M7>'"<>70
0,41'Γί,Ρ41-«0Γ'2102
0,20'•<S,5ic.1.1«M 33
■0,51';0,61,.0.21.7?,346
0,410,9?O.î1û?.553
1,03-14,019 -0,1.036,4
1,7!53,63•°,?1l9'J
2,3« I?,52°»32,7C'3y>
8,312M1°«3 ,l70,5^
'12,0221,210,00,f'-9°
JJ.3U30,200,1070.C70
0,3o'0,0,0•0,0o40.510
1,110.100,0041,9
2,7I2lo,Olojo,0O-40,3j>2
.to,x£4. ExternaiTrade,microflches .

zr_
HERRING ••
"SARDINES Médit.
Atlont.
REDFISH
COO
COALFISH
HADDOCK
-■* ,
■WHITING
rtACKEREL
|ANCHOVIES..
!PLAICE
-
HAKE '
-.ftSHRIMPS
TUNNYANNEXIV
,Average EECpricesforcertain
speciesoffryshfish(namedin
AnnexesIandIIItoRegulation
j (EEC)No100/76)''
Prirponfirstsalp...a/tnnnp ' .■
>IΛθ7Α I1977 ΙΊ978 I1979ISPECIES >W6 .wr– (fUtt.ix .
iI•'*'I' I months)
Source:Memberstates.265
258
596
458
607
336
483
441
169.
345
554
1.993
824
643'I411
224:.
532
483
751
441
666
561
181
297
575
2.196
1.411
877447
243;
386
525
702
492
770
517
172
205
666
2.204
1.191
643376•
222:■
410
523
722
456
774
494
175
175
651"
2.664
1.633
637

ANNEXIV
t• • Average EECpricesforcertain 1
frozenproducts (namedinAnnexIIto
1 Regulation (EEC)No100/76)'
»
' .■'■·
•r■·■.ι.»
!»Priceonfirst
«.saleinu.a./tonne
••
•
:\SPECIES · 1976 1977 1978 1979
(firstsix
months)
SARDINES '
A «01976 ·
61977
««
1978=247
1979■243
.i
*
jSEA-BREAM
•ofthespecies
iOENTEXandPAGELLUS
OCTOPUS•1.109
1.167.879
939833
1.068963
1.300
H.CUTTLEFISH ofthe
species SEPIA:
1.199 1.160 1.213
SQUID
.(OMNASTREPHES )
SQUID(LOLIGO) «302
•1.262686
2.233
'· '953
2.166
Source:MemberStates.

Intervention intheCommunityANNEX V
:■ .....1977
•t.1978
t.19791980.·..–:–r
1.1.80-30.6:33
Germany 5.435 7.5104.816,5
'Belgium 1.145 1.200 1.111 1.223
Netherlands 3.036 1.412 . 1.829 1.430
France · 6.244 6.659 10.3536.COO(provis.)
Ireland 4.813 11.185 8.636 . 2.204
Jtaly 2.032* •24.176 33.26010.000(provis.)
UnitedKingdom *32.508 .-8.119 2.452 «4.891 "··;-:·.>."
Denmark - 1.006 1.452 "3.558 *;2.407 -–––
TOTAL 50.788
•59.688 68.70932.000 ,(provis.)
*from1October.~
»
f
f
ii
-I
•' ,'* ... _•• • ■a «

Movementofproducerpricesforcertain
keyspeciesinthefirstsixmonthsof1980
againstaveragepricesin1979ANNEX IV
UnitedKingdom -5%'
■·«··
Belgium~2% "•
Germany
Ireland
Netherlands
France
Denmark-1%(5%increase forredfish
0„'andcoalfish )""OA
+1-2%
+8,5%
+9%«
Italy
––Pricefallforsardines,anchovies andsquid'"
Source :MemberStates.