ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 222/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5467 — RWE/Essent)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 222/01

On 23 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 199/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5550 — BP/Dupont/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 199/02

On 8 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
|COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels , 25.9.2009

SG-Greffe(2009) D/5653

C(2009) 7519

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam/Sir,

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5619 - BIDVEST/ NOWACO GROUP Notification of 28.08.2009 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C209, 04.09.2009 p.10.

1. On 28.08.2009 the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 ("EC Merger Regulation") by which by which the undertaking Bidvest Group Limited ('Bidvest', South Africa) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation control of Nowaco Czech Republic s.r.o. and Farutex Sp.zo.o (together, 'Nowaco Group', Czech Republic/Poland) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Bidvest: international services, trading and distribution and wholesale distribution of foodservice products.

- Nowaco Group: wholesale and independent retail distribution of foodservice products.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Philip LOWE Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 224/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5568 — Volkswagen/Fleet Investments/Leaseplan Corporation JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 224/03

On 19 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 263/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5649 — RREEF FUND/ENDESA/UFG/SAGGAS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 263/01

On 21 October 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 270/9

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5589 — SONY/SEIKO EPSON)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 270/02

On 22 September 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 291/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5647 — Advent/GFKL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 291/02

On 23 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 279/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5665 — CD&R/CMH/JDHI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 279/02

On 12 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 1/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5693 — Hal Holding/Safilo Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 1/02

On 11 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 308/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5686 — Vitol Holding/Petroplus Refining Antwerp/Petroplus Refining Antwerp Bitumen)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 308/03

On 9 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 25/17

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5685 — Louis Dreyfus/Fin Lov/SBM/Mangas Gaming)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 25/07

On 27 January 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 16.3.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/3219/3220

C(2010) 1869

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties: | |

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5554 - HAVI/ KEYLUX/ STI FREIGHT JV Notification of 17/02/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 47, 25/02/2010 p. 27

1. On 17 February 2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the EC Merger Regulation by which the undertakings HAVI Global Logistics GmbH ("HAVI", Germany), belonging to HAVI Group LP (USA), and McKey Luxembourg S.à.r.l ("KeyLux", Luxembourg), belonging to Keystone Group (USA), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking STI Freight Management GmbH ("STI Freight", Germany) by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for HAVI: food and non-food logistics and distribution, food processing, packaging and administrative services and promotional marketing,

- for KeyLux: freight forwarding, logistics and distribution in the food sector,

- for STI Freight: taking over of the activities of the "STI Global Network" companies in the food/non-food freight forwarding sector.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (Signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32 ("Notice on a simplified procedure").
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 60/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5579 — TLP/Ermewa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 60/01

On 22 January 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 101/11

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5697 — Alstom Holdings/Alstom Hydro Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 101/04

On 13 January 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 150/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5856 — OCI/Certain fertilizer and related businesses of DSM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 150/03

On 25 May 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 182/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5878 — CVC/Caixanova/R Cable)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 182/02

On 28 May 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 150/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5873 — Advent/DFS Furniture Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 150/01

On 2 June 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 03.08.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/11955 / 11956

C(2010)5498

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5858 – CARREFOUR/ MARINOPOULOS/ BALKAN JV Notification of 05/07/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C188, 13/07/2010, p.11.

1. On 05/07/2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Carrefour S.A. ("Carrefour", France), and Marinopoulos Holding S.à r.l. ("Marinopoulos", Luxembourg), belonging to the Marinopoulos group, acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking CM Balkans B.V. ("Balkan JV", the Netherlands) by way of contract and purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture, respectively.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Carrefour: food and non-food retailing in own-operated or franchised grocery stores (hypermarkets, supermarkets, discount and convenience stores) in Europe, Latin America and Asia.

- for the Marinopoulos group: food and non-food retailing, manufacture of cosmetics and pharmaceutical products, retailing of clothes, cosmetics, optical products and specialty coffee in a number of countries in Europe, including Greece and Cyprus.

- for the Balkan JV: operation of 4 supermarkets in Bulgaria and the development of hypermarkets and supermarkets under the Carrefour brand in the Balkans, namely Bulgaria, Slovenia, Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a) and (b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 16.09.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/13925, 13924

C(2010) 6431

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5784 – MAGNA/ SEMIKRON/ JV Notification of 13.08.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 226, 21.08.2010, p.15

1. On 13.08.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Magna International Inc ("Magna", Canada) and Semikron Elektronik GmbH & Co. KG ("Semikron", Germany) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking Vepoint GmbH & Co. KG ("Vepoint", Germany) by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Magna is a diversified global automotive supplier. It designs, develops and manufactures automotive systems, assemblies, modules and components, and engineers and assembles complete vehicles. Its products and services are sold primarily to OEMs of cars and light trucks world-wide.

- Semikron is a global power electronic producer. It designs, develops, manufactures and sells power modules for energy conversion in power electronics applications such as motor control, power supply, renewable energy, and welding equipment.

- Vepoint will develop, manufacture and supply inverters, DC/DC converters and battery chargers for the use in hybrid and electric cars.

2. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.