ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 324/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5283 — Sappi/M-real)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 324/03)

On 31 October 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 37/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5443 — Otsuka Pharmaceutica/Nardobel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 37/03)

On 5 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 66/24

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5253 — Sanofi-Aventis/Zentiva)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 66/08)

On 4 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 107/10

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5347 — Mapfre/Salvador Caetano/JV'S)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 107/02

On 20 April 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 147/9

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5484 — SGL Carbon/Brembo/BCBS/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 147/06

On 27 May 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 165/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5513 — KMG/CNPC/MMG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 165/02

On 9 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/9

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5548 — Barclays/RBS/Hillary)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 178/04

On 6 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 284/16

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5663 — AVIO/SECI-E/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 284/04

On 18 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only Italian language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 321/9

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5719 — Oaktree/SGD)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 321/03

On 17 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 28/12

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5759 — Macquarie Funds/Antin IP/Pisto Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 28/04

On 1 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels, 25.3.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/4270 D/4271

PUBLIC VERSION C(2010) 2093

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5801 – KKR/ HANS-PETER WILD/ WILD GROUP Notification of 23.02.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 53, 03.03.2010, p.11

1. On 23.02.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the EC Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co, L.P. ("KKR", USA) and Dr. Hans-Peter Wild ("Hans-Peter Wild", Germany), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the of the food flavourings business of the Wild Group by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

– for KKR : asset management and private equity investment,

– for Dr. Hans-Peter Wild: shareholder of the Wild Group businesses,

– for the Wild Group: production of natural ingredients for the food and beverage industry (including food flavourings), production and sale of specific beverages, and supply of industrial technologies to the food and beverage industry.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 (c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32 ("Notice on a simplified procedure").
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 135/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5816 — Oaktree/Aleris)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 135/01

On 18 May 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5781 — Total Holdings Europe SAS/ERG SPA/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 178/02

On 21 May 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 20.07.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/11237/11238

C(2010)5150

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5924 – TRIDENT / HELLMAN & FRIEDMAN / SEDGWICK Notification of 18.06.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 168, 26.06.2010, p. 8

1. On 18/06/2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertakings, Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VI, L.P. (“HFCP VI”, UK), one of the private equity funds controlled by Hellman & Friedman LLC (such funds, collectively with Hellman & Friedman LLC, “H&F”, USA) and Trident IV, L.P. (“Trident IV”, USA), one of the private equity funds controlled by Stone Point Capital LLC (such funds, collectively with Stone Point Capital LLC, “Trident”, USA), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Sedgwick, Inc., including the various companies it directly or indirectly controls (“Sedgwick”, USA), by way of contract of management or any other means.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- H&F : private equity fund : long-term equity capital in businesses in growing markets;

- Trident : private equity fund, investing in the insurance, employee benefits and financial services industries;

- Sedgwick : operates in the field of third party administration services primarily in the workers' compensation, disability, liability and related markets, only in the U.S. and Canada.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraphs 5(a) & 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission,

(signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 23.09.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/14440/14441

PUBLIC VERSION C(2010) 6690

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5956 – EADS/ OPIP/ JV Notification of 26.08.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 237, 02.09.2010, p.20

1. On 26.08.2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertakings EADS Deutschland GmbH ("EADS DS", Germany), belonging to the EADS group (The Netherlands), and Odebrecht Plantas Industriais e Participaçoes S.A. ("OPIP", Brazil), controlled by Odebrecht S.A. (Brazil), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a newly created company constituting a joint venture ("JV"), by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

­ EADS DS: integrated defence and security solutions. EADS group is active in aircrafts, telecommunications equipment, defence and security systems and satellites,

­ OPIP: engineering, civil construction and industrial assembly services. Odebrecht S.A. is a business conglomerate active in several areas (engineering, construction, chemical, petrochemical industries, oil and gas, environmental engineering, real-estate developments, infrastructure investments, and bio energy),

­ JV: market electronic defence and security systems and products.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 29.10.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/17251

C(2010) 7663

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6008 – IK/ GHD Notification of 29/09/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 273, 09/10/2010, p.4

1. On 29/09/2010 the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the IK Investment Partners ("IK", the Netherlands) acquire(s) within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation control of the whole of GHD GesundHeits GmbH Deutschland (GHD, Germany) by way of purchase of shares.The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- IK: a European private equity investment firm;

- GHD: active in the provision of medical devices and certain pharmaceutical products to non-hospitalized patients, wholesale of medical devices and pharmaceuticals, provision of logistic services in Germany, as well as production of compounded pharmaceuticals and ostomy products.

2. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (Signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 6.12.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/19525/19526

C(2010) 8958

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5753 - DSB/ FIRST/ DSBFIRST VAST Notification of 03.11.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 304, 10.11.2010, p.14

1. On 3 November 2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings DSB ("DSB", Denmark) and FIRSTGroup plc ("First", United Kingdom) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of DSBFirst Väst Aps ("DSBFirst Väst"), an extension of the existing joint venture DSBFirst Aps ("DSBFirst", Sweden), by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for DSB: regional and interregional railway transport in Denmark and Sweden;

- for FIRST: operation of rail passenger franchises mainly in the United Kingdom;

- for DSBFirst Väst: operation of a rail passenger franchise as of December 2010 until December 2018 in western Sweden, franchise awarded on basis of a public tender.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.