ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 184 , 15 . 7 . 1975 , P . 1 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 316 , 6 . 12 . 1975 , P . 17 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 2 FEBRUARY 1979

ALLOWING ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF THE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' LAB-80 DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING SYSTEM '

( 79/207/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 ON THE IMPORTATION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF EDUCATIONAL , SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL MATERIALS ( 1 ),

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 OF 2 DECEMBER 1975 LAYING DOWN PROVISIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLES 4 AND 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS BY LETTER DATED 4 AUGUST 1978 , THE UNITED KINGDOM GOVERNMENT REQUESTED THE COMMISSION TO INVOKE THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN ARTICLES 4 AND 5 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' LAB-80 DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING SYSTEM ' SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS AND , IF THE REPLY IS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE , WHETHER APPARATUS OF EQUIVALENT SCIENTIFIC VALUE IS CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 4 ( 5 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 , A GROUP OF EXPERTS COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL THE MEMBER STATES MET ON 13 DECEMBER 1978 WITHIN THE COMMITTEE ON DUTY-FREE ARRANGEMENTS TO EXAMINE THIS PARTICULAR CASE ;

WHEREAS THIS EXAMINATION SHOWS THAT THE APPARATUS IN QUESTION IS A MICROCOMPUTER SYSTEM FOR THE ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING OF DATA USED MORE ESPECIALLY FOR FUNDAMENTAL CHEMISTRY PHYSICAL RESEARCH IN QUANTUM RESOLVED DYNAMICS ELECTRONICALLY EXCITED MOLECULAR STATES ;

WHEREAS ITS CHARACTERISTICS AND ITS INTENDED USE RENDER IT PARTICULARLY SUITABLE FOR PURE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ; WHEREAS IT MUST THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED TO BE A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS ;

WHEREAS ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MEMBER STATES , APPARATUS OF EQUIVALENT SCIENTIFIC VALUE CAPABLE OF USE FOR THE SAME PURPOSE IS NOT CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ; WHEREAS , THEREFORE , DUTY-FREE ADMISSION OF THIS APPARATUS IS JUSTIFIED ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

1 . THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' LAB-80 DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING SYSTEM ' MUST BE CONSIDERED TO BE A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS .

2 . THE CONDITIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( B ) OF COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 FOR ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 1 ARE FULFILLED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 2 FEBRUARY 1979 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

ETIENNE DAVIGNON

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
8.3.79 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities NoL57/39
COMMISSION DECISION
of21February1979
authorizingtheFrenchRepublicnottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttoelec­
tricalmeasuring ,checking,analysingorautomatically controllinginstruments
andapparatus,fallingwithinheadingNo90.28oftheCommonCustomsTariff,
originatinginJapanandinfreecirculationintheotherMemberStates
(OnlytheFrenchtextisauthentic)
(79/256/EEC)
Whereas,however,theapplicationforalicencewhich
gaverisetotheapplicationinquestiondoesnotneed
tobecoveredbysuchanauthorization inviewofthe
smallamountinvolved,
HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1
TheFrenchRepublicisauthorizednottoapply
Communitytreatmenttotheproductsindicated
below,wheretheyoriginateinJapanandareinfree
circulationintheotherMemberStates,andinrespect
ofwhichapplicationsforimportlicenceswerelodged
after5February1979:THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,andinparticularthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115thereof,
Havingregardtotheapplicationunderthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115oftheTreaty,madeon8
February1979bytheFrenchGovernment tothe
Commission oftheEuropeanCommunities ,for
authorizationnottoapplyCommunitytreatmentto
electricalmeasuring,checking,analyzingorautomati­
callycontrollinginstrumentsandapparatus,falling
withinheadingNo90.28oftheCommonCustoms
Tariff,originatinginJapanandinfreecirculationin
theotherMemberStates,
WhereasinFrancetheimportationoftheproductsin
questionoriginatinginJapanissubjecttoanannual
quota,whichiscurrentlybeingdistributed ;
Whereasthedisparitieswhichexistinthecommercial
policymeasuresappliedinconnectionwiththese
productsbytheMemberStatesarecausingdeflection
oftrade,therebypreventingtheexecutionofthose
commercialpolicymeasureswhichareinforce
becauseofthedifficulteconomicsituationinthe
sectorconcerned ;
Whereasfurtherindirectimports,inadditiontothose
alreadymadeorproposed,wouldbelikelytoaggra­
vatethesedifficulties ;
Whereasitisnotpossibletosetinmotionrapidlythe
machineryforbringingaboutthenecessarycoopera­
tionfromtheotherMemberStates;
Whereasauthorizationshouldaccordinglybegiven
fortheapplicationofprotectivemeasuresunderthe
firstparagraphofArticle115,subjecttothecondi­
tionslaiddowninCommission Decision71/202/EEC
of12May1971(*),andinparticularArticle1thereof;CCT
heading
NoDescription
90.28 Electricalmeasuring,checking,analyzing
orautomatically controllinginstruments
andapparatus
Article2
ThisDecisionshallapplyuntil30June1979.
Article3
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheFrenchRepublic.
DoneatBrussels,21February 1979.
FortheCommission
WilhelmHAFERKAMP
Vice-President
(')OJNoL121,3.6.1971,p.26.
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 162 , 23 . 6 . 1976 , P . 10 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 223 , 14 . 8 . 1978 , P . 1 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 8 FEBRUARY 1979

AMENDING THE ANNEX TO FIFTH COUNCIL DECISION 76/539/EEC ON THE EQUIVALENCE OF SEED PRODUCED IN THIRD COUNTRIES

( 79/235/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO FIFTH COUNCIL DECISION 76/539/EEC OF 17 MAY 1976 ON THE EQUIVALENCE OF SEED PRODUCED IN THIRD COUNTRIES ( 1 ), AS LAST AMENDED BY DECISION 78/661/EEC ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 2 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS ON 14 JUNE 1977 THE COUNCIL OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ( OECD ) ACCEPTED A SCHEME FOR THE VARIETAL CERTIFICATION OF MAIZE SEED MOVING IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE ;

WHEREAS THIS SYSTEM IS INTENDED TO SERVE IN FUTURE AS A BASIS OF REFERENCE FOR THE EQUIVALENCE OF MAIZE SEED PRODUCED IN THIRD COUNTRIES ;

WHEREAS IT IS THEREFORE NECESSARY , AS A FIRST STEP , TO ESTABLISH , IN ADDITION TO THE EQUIVALENCE OF CERTAIN NATIONAL SYSTEMS , THE EQUIVALENCE ALSO OF THIS OECD SYSTEM FOR MAIZE SEED HARVESTED AFTER 30 JUNE 1979 IN THOSE THIRD COUNTRIES ALREADY ABLE TO APPLY THE OECD SYSTEM ;

WHEREAS THE GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC HAS GIVEN NOTICE THAT THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR THE CERTIFICATION OF SEEDS HAS CHANGED ;

WHEREAS IT IS THEREFORE NECESSARY TO AMEND THE ANNEX TO THE ABOVEMENTIONED DECISION IN RELATION TO CANADA , ROMANIA , SWITZERLAND , HUNGARY , THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON SEEDS AND PROPAGATING MATERIAL FOR AGRICULTURE , HORTICULTURE AND FORESTRY ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE ANNEX TO FIFTH COUNCIL DECISION 76/539/EEC SHALL BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS :

1 . UNDER REFERENCE NOS 6 , 12 , 14 , 19 AND 20 IN THE TABLE , THE PARTICULARS SET OUT IN COLUMNS 5 , 6 AND 7 CONCERNING MAIZE SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE FOLLOWING :

****

2 . UNDER REFERENCE NO 22 IN THE TABLE , THE PARTICULARS SET OUT IN COLUMN 3 SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE FOLLOWING :

' AMT FUER STANDARDISIERUNG ,

MESSWESEN UND WARENPRUEFUNG ,

FACHGEBIET SAAT- UND PFLANZGUT ,

DRESDEN ' .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 8 FEBRUARY 1979 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

FINN GUNDELACH

VICE-PRESIDENT
15.3.79 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities NoL65/31
COMMISSION DECISION
of20February1979
authorizingtheFrenchRepublicnottoapplyCommunitytreatmentto
receivers,whetherornotincorporating soundrecordersorreproducers ,falling
withinsubheading85.15AIIIoftheCommonCustomsTariff,originatingin
HongKongandinfreecirculationintheotherMemberStates
(OnlytheFrenchtextisauthentic)
(79/276/EEC)
firstparagraphofArticle115,subjecttothecondi­
tionslaiddowninCommission Decision71/202/EEC
of12May1971(1),andinparticularArticle1thereof;
Whereas,however,theapplicationforalicencewhich
gaverisetotheapplicationinquestiondoesnotneed
tobecoveredbysuchanauthorizationinviewofthe
smallamountinvolved,
HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1
TheFrenchRepublicisauthorizednottoapply
Communitytreatmenttotheproductsindicated
below,wheretheyoriginateinHongKongandarein
freecirculationintheotherMemberStates,andin
respectofwhichapplicationsforimportlicenceswere
lodgedafter5February1979:THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,andinparticularthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115thereof,
Havingregardtotheapplicationunderthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115oftheTreaty,madeon7
February1979bytheFrenchGovernmenttothe
Commission oftheEuropeanCommunities ,for
authorizationnottoapplyCommunitytreatmentto
receivers,whetherornotincorporating soundrecor­
dersorreproducers,fallingwithinsubheading85.15A
IIIoftheCommonCustomsTariff,originatingin
HongKongandinfreecirculationintheother
MemberStates,
WhereasinFrancetheimportationoftheproductsin
questionoriginatinginHongKongissubjecttoan
annualquotawhichiscurrentlybeingdistributed;
Whereasthedisparitieswhichexistinthecommercial
policymeasuresappliedinconnectionwiththese
producesbytheMemberStatesarecausingdeflection
oftrade,therebypreventingtheexecutionofthose
commercialpolicymeasureswhichareinforce
becauseofthedifficulteconomicsituationinthe
sectorconcerned ;
Whereasitappearsfromtheapplicationsubmitted
thatthereareseriousdifficultiesintheindustrial
sectorconcerned,involvingaconsiderabledropin
productionandemployment ;
Whereasfurtherindirectimports,inadditiontothose
alreadymadeorproposed,wouldbelikelytoaggra­
vatethesedifficulties ;
Whereasitisnotpossibletosetinmotionrapidlythe
machineryforbringingaboutthenecessarycoopera­
tionfromtheotherMemberStates;
Whereasauthorization shouldaccordinglybegiven
fortheapplicationofprotectivemeasuresundertheCCT
heading
NoDescription
85.15AIIIReceivers,whetherornotincorporating
soundrecorderorreproducers
Article2
ThisDecisionshallapplyuntil30June1979.
Article3
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheFrenchRepublic.
DoneatBrussels,20February1979.
FortheCommission
WilhelmHAFERKAMP
Vice-President
(')OJNoL121,3.6.1971,p.26.
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 184 , 15 . 7 . 1975 , P . 1 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 316 , 6 . 12 . 1975 , P . 17 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 8 MARCH 1979

EXCLUDING FROM ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES THE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' PGT INTRINSIC GERMANIUM DETECTOR , MODEL IGC 13 ' WITH PREAMPLIFIER MODEL RG-11AC

( 79/315/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 ON THE IMPORTATION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF EDUCATIONAL , SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL MATERIALS ( 1 ),

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 OF 2 DECEMBER 1975 LAYING DOWN PROVISIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLES 4 AND 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS , BY LETTER DATED 8 SEPTEMBER 1978 , THE DANISH GOVERNMENT REQUESTED THE COMMISSION TO INVOKE THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN ARTICLES 4 AND 5 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' PGT INTRINSIC GERMANIUM DETECTOR , MODEL IGC 13 ' WITH PREAMPLIFIER MODEL RG-11AC , FOR USE IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS RESEARCH , PARTICULARLY IN CONNECTION WITH HIGH-TENSION STATES , SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS AND , WHERE THE REPLY IS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE , WHETHER APPARATUS OF EQUIVALENT SCIENTIFIC VALUE IS CURRENTLY BEING MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS , IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 4 ( 5 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 , A GROUP OF EXPERTS COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL THE MEMBER STATES MET ON 12 JANUARY 1979 WITHIN THE COMMITTEE ON DUTY-FREE ARRANGEMENTS TO EXAMINE THIS PARTICULAR CASE ;

WHEREAS THIS EXAMINATION SHOWED THAT THE APPARATUS IN QUESTION IS AN INTRINSIC GERMANIUM DETECTOR , SUPPLEMENTED BY A PREAMPLIFIER ; WHEREAS ITS SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS RELATIVE EFFICIENCY AND RESOLUTION AND THE USE TO WHICH IT IS PUT MAKE IT SPECIALLY SUITED TO PURE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ; WHEREAS IT MUST THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED TO BE A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS ;

WHEREAS , HOWEVER , ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MEMBER STATES , APPARATUS OF SCIENTIFIC VALUE EQUIVALENT TO THE SAID APPARATUS CAPABLE OF BEING USED FOR THE SAME PURPOSES IS CURRENTLY BEING MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ; WHEREAS THIS APPLIES IN PARTICULAR TO THE APPARATUS EG PC 12H MANUFACTURED BY THE FIRM ENERTEC-SCHLUMBERGER , 1 , RUE NIEUPORT , 78140 VELIZY-VILLACOUBLAY ( FRANCE ),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

1 . THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' PGT INTRINSIC GERMANIUM DETECTOR , MODEL IGC 13 ' WITH PREAMPLIFIER MODEL RG-11AC IS CONSIDERED TO BE A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS .

2 . THE CONDITIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( B ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 FOR ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF THE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 1 ARE NOT FULFILLED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 8 MARCH 1979 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

ETIENNE DAVIGNON

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 169 , 10 . 7 . 1969 , P . 3 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 350 , 14 . 12 . 1978 , P . 27 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 20 MARCH 1979

AUTHORIZING THE FRENCH REPUBLIC TO PERMIT TEMPORARILY THE MARKETING OF SEED NOT COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 69/208/EEC

( 79/356/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 69/208/EEC OF 30 JUNE 1969 ON THE MARKETING OF SEED OF OIL AND FIBRE PLANTS ( 1 ), AS LAST AMENDED BY DIRECTIVE 78/1020/EEC ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 16 THEREOF ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE REQUEST MADE BY THE FRENCH REPUBLIC ,

WHEREAS IN THE FRENCH REPUBLIC THE PRODUCTION OF SUNFLOWER SEED COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SAID DIRECTIVE HAS BEEN INSUFFICIENT IN 1978 AND THEREFORE WILL NOT BE ADEQUATE TO MEET THAT COUNTRY ' S NEEDS ;

WHEREAS IT IS NOT POSSIBLE SUFFICIENTLY TO COVER THIS DEMAND WITH SEED FROM OTHER MEMBER STATES , OR FROM THIRD COUNTRIES , MEETING ALL THE REQUIREMENTS LAID DOWN IN THE SAID DIRECTIVE ;

WHEREAS THE FRENCH REPUBLIC SHOULD THEREFORE BE AUTHORIZED TO PERMIT , FOR A PERIOD EXPIRING ON 31 JULY 1979 , THE MARKETING OF SEED OF THE ABOVEMENTIONED SPECIES OF VARIETIES NOT INCLUDED EITHER IN THE COMMON CATALOGUE OF VARIETIES OF AGRICULTURAL PLANT SPECIES OR IN THE FRENCH NATIONAL CATALOGUES OF VARIETIES ;

WHEREAS , MOREOVER , OTHER MEMBER STATES , WHICH ARE ABLE TO SUPPLY THE FRENCH REPUBLIC WITH SEED NOT COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DIRECTIVE , SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO PERMIT THE MARKETING OF SUCH SEED PROVIDED THAT IT IS INTENDED FOR FRANCE ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON SEED AND PROPAGATING MATERIAL FOR AGRICULTURE , HORTICULTURE AND FORESTRY ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE FRENCH REPUBLIC IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO PERMIT FOR A PERIOD EXPIRING ON 31 JULY 1979 THE MARKETING IN ITS TERRITORY OF A MAXIMUM OF 45 TONNES OF SUNFLOWER SEED ( HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L .) OF THE CATEGORY ' CERTIFIED SEED ' OF HYBRID VARIETIES RESISTANT TO MILDEW INCLUDED NEITHER IN THE COMMON CATALOGUE OF VARIETIES OF AGRICULTURAL PLANT SPECIES NOR IN ITS NATIONAL CATALOGUES OF VARIETIES .

THE OFFICIAL LABEL SHALL STATE ' INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR FRANCE ' .

ARTICLE 2

THE OTHER MEMBER STATES ARE HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO PERMIT , SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 1 , THE MARKETING IN THEIR TERRITORY OF A MAXIMUM OF 45 TONNES OF SUNFLOWER SEED , PROVIDED THAT IT IS INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR FRANCE . THE OFFICIAL LABEL SHALL STATE : ' INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR FRANCE ' .

ARTICLE 3

MEMBER STATES SHALL NOTIFY THE COMMISSION BEFORE 30 NOVEMBER 1979 OF THE QUANTITIES OF SEED MARKETED IN THEIR TERRITORY PURSUANT TO THIS DECISION . THE COMMISSION SHALL INFORM THE OTHER MEMBER STATES THEREOF .

ARTICLE 4

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 20 MARCH 1979 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

FINN GUNDELACH

VICE-PRESIDENT
NoL93/40 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 12.4.79
COUNCILDECISION
of9April1979
undertheTreaties,concerningfisheryactivitiesinwatersunderthesovereignty
orjurisdictionofMemberStates,takenonatemporarybasispendingtheadop­
tionofpermanentCommunitymeasures
(79/383/EEC)
TheCouncilintendstoreachanagreementasearlyaspossiblein1979onCommunity
measuresfortheconservationandmanagementoffisheryresourcesandrelatedmatters.
PendingitsdecisioninthematterandinviewbothofArticle102oftheActofAccession
andoftheneedtoprotectthebiologicalresourcesandtomaintainsuitablerelationswith
thirdcountriesinfisheriesmatters,theCouncil,on19December1978,adoptedinterim
measureswhichwereinforcefrom1Januaryto31March1979.Followingonfromthese
measures,theCouncilhasdecidedonthefollowinginterimmeasureswhichwillapply
from1April1979untiltheCouncilhasreachedadefinitiveagreementoruntil30June
1979,whicheveristheearlier:
1.MemberStatesshallconducttheirfisheriesinsuchawaythatthecatchesoftheir
vesselsduringtheinterimperiodshalltakeintoaccountTACssubmittedbythe
Commission totheCouncilintheircommunications of23November1978and16
February1979andthepartoftheTACsmadeavailabletothirdcountriesunderagree­
mentsorarrangementsmadewiththembytheCommunity .Thecatchestakeninthe
interimperiodwillbeoffsetagainsttheallocationseventuallydecideduponbythe
Councilfor1979.
2.Asregardstechnicalmeasuresfortheconservationandsurveillanceoffishery
resources,MemberStatesshallapplythesamemeasuresastheyappliedon3
November1976,andothermeasurestakeninaccordancewiththeproceduresand
criteriaofAnnexVIoftheCouncilresolutionof3November1976.
DoneatLuxembourg ,9April1979.
FortheCouncil
ThePresident
M.d'ORNANO
COMMISSION DECISION of 23 March 1979 refusing to accept the scientific character of the apparatus described as "MRC - Sputtersphere Type 822" (79/375/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3195/75 of 2 December 1975 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (2), and in particular Articles 4 and 5 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 20 September 1978, the French Government requested the Commission to invoke the procedure laid down in Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 3195/75 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as "MRC - Sputtersphere Type 822" with an air-lock and automatic adjustment, to be used for research in the photolithogravure field, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 3195/75, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 7 February 1979 within the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine this particular case;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a cathodic pulverizer in current use which does not have the requisite objective technical characteristics rendering it specifically suited to pure scientific research ; whereas this apparatus is primarily used in industry ; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus specifically suited to pure scientific research ; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as "MRC - Sputtersphere Type 822" is not considered to be a scientific apparatus.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 1979.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 316, 6.12.1975, p. 17.
26.4.79 NoL104/39 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities
COMMISSION DECISION
of9April1979
authorizingtheKingdomofBelgium,theGrandDuchyofLuxembourgandthe
KingdomoftheNetherlandsnottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttounglazed
setts,flagsandpaving,hearthandwalltiles,fallingwithinheadingNosex69.07
andex69.08oftheCommonCustomsTariff,originatinginJapanandinfree
circulation intheotherMemberStates
\
(OnlytheDutchandFrenchtextsareauthentic)
(79/418/EEC)
THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,andinparticularthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115thereof,Whereasfurtherindirectimports,inadditiontothose
alreadymade,wouldbelikelytoaggravatethesediffi­
cultiesandtojeopardizetheeffectiveness ofthe
commercialmeasuresinquestion;
Whereasitisnotpossibletosetinmotionrapidlythe
machineryforbringingaboutthenecessarycoopera­
tionfromtheotherMemberStates;
Whereasauthorization shouldaccordinglybegiven
fortheapplicationofprotectivemeasuresunderthe
firstparagraphofArticle115,subjecttothecondi­
tionslaiddowninCommission Decision71/202/EEC
of12May1971('),andinparticularArticle1thereof,Havingregardtotheapplicationunderthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115oftheTreaty,madeon4April
1979bytheGovernments oftheBeneluxcountriesto
theCommissionoftheEuropeanCommunities ,for
authorization nottoapplyCommunitytreatmentto
unglazedsetts,flagsandpaving,hearthandwalltiles,
fallingwithinheadingNosex69.07andex69.08of
theCommonCustomsTariff,originatinginJapan
andinfreecirculationintheotherMemberStates,HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1
WhereasintheBeneluxcountriestheimportationof
theproductsinquestionoriginatinginJapanis
subjecttoanannualquotawhichhasalreadybeen
whollytakenup;TheKingdomofBelgium,theGrandDuchyof
LuxembourgandtheKingdomoftheNetherlandsare
authorizednottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttothe
productsindicatedbelow,wheretheyoriginatein
JapanandareinfreecirculationintheotherMember
States,andinrespectofwhichapplicationsforimport
licenceswerelodgedafter22March1979:Whereasthedisparitieswhichexistinthecommercial
policymeasuresappliedinconnectionwiththese
productsbytheMemberStatesarecausingdeflection
oftrade,therebypreventingtheexecutionofthose
commercialpolicymeasureswhichareinforce
becauseofthedifficulteconomicsituationinthe
sectorconcerned ;CCT
heading Description
No
ex69.07andUnglazedsetts,flagsandpaving,hearth
ex69.08 andwalltiles
Whereasitappearsfromtheapplicationsubmitted
thatthereareseriousdifficultiesintheindustrial
sectorconcerned,involvingaconsiderabledropin
productionandemployment ;Article2
ThisDecisionshallapplyuntilnewopportunities
ariseintheBeneluxcountriesfortheimportationof
theseproductsfromJapanoruntil30June1979,
whicheveristheearlier.Whereastheseeconomicdifficultiesarecausedlargely
byunequalconditionsofcompetition ,whichallow
exportstobemadeatpricesappreciablylowerthan
thoseoftheCommunityproductsinquestion; (')OJNoL121,3.6.1971,p.26.

NoL104/40 26.4.79 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities
Article3 DoneatBrussels,9April1979.
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheKingdomof
Belgium,theGrandDuchyofLuxembourgandthe
KingdomoftheNetherlands .FortheCommission
ÉtienneDAVIGNON
MemberoftheCommission