ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 318 , 18 . 12 . 1969 , P . 1 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 142 , 30 . 5 . 1978 , P . 13 .

( 3 ) OJ NO L 213 , 11 . 8 . 1975 , P . 53 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 20 DECEMBER 1979

ON THE REIMBURSEMENT BY THE GUIDANCE SECTION OF THE EAGGF TO THE FRENCH REPUBLIC OF AIDS GRANTED DURING 1978 FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF COMMUNITY CITRUS FRUIT

( ONLY THE FRENCH TEXT IS AUTHENTIC )

( 80/113/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2511/69 OF 9 DECEMBER 1969 LAYING DOWN SPECIAL MEASURES FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF COMMUNITY CITRUS FRUIT ( 1 ), AS LAST AMENDED BY REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1122/78 ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 5 ( 2 ) THEREOF ,

WHEREAS THE PLAN PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2511/69 HAS BEEN FORWARDED BY THE FRENCH REPUBLIC AND WAS THE SUBJECT OF A FAVOURABLE COMMISSION DECISION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 2 OF THE SAID REGULATION ;

WHEREAS THE FRENCH REPUBLIC HAS MADE AN APPLICATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ALL ITS EXPENDITURE INCURRED DURING 1978 IN RESPECT OF AIDS GRANTED UNDER ARTICLE 1 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2511/69 ;

WHEREAS THIS APPLICATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2051/75 OF 25 JULY 1975 CONCERNING APPLICATIONS FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT OF AIDS GRANTED BY MEMBER STATES FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF COMMUNITY CITRUS FRUIT ( 3 );

WHEREAS AN EXAMINATION OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED SHOWS THAT ELIGIBLE AIDS FOR 1978 AMOUNTING TO FF 609 290 BROKEN DOWN AS FOLLOWS :

- UNDER ARTICLE 1 ( 1 ) ( A):FF 609 290 - UNDER ARTICLE 1 ( 1 ) ( B ): - - UNDER ARTICLE 1 ( 2 ): - OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2511/69 WERE PAID UNDER THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 1 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2511/69 AND ITS DETAILED RULES OF APPLICATION ; WHEREAS THE GUIDANCE SECTION OF THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL GUIDANCE AND GUARANTEE FUND SHOULD THEREFORE REIMBURSE 50 % THEREOF , I.E . FF 304 645 .

WHEREAS THE EAGGF COMMITTEE HAS BEEN CONSULTED ON THE FINANCIAL ASPECTS AND IN PARTICULAR AS TO THE FUNDS AVAILABLE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE CONTRIBUTION BY THE GUIDANCE SECTION OF THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL GUIDANCE AND GUARANTEE FUND TOWARDS THE EXPENDITURE INCURRED BY THE FRENCH REPUBLIC DURING 1978 IN RESPECT OF AIDS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF COMMUNITY CITRUS FRUIT SHALL BE FF 304 645 .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE FRENCH REPUBLIC .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 20 DECEMBER 1979 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

FINN GUNDELACH

VICE-PRESIDENT
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 121 , 3 . 6 . 1971 , P . 26 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 18 JANUARY 1980

AUTHORIZING THE FRENCH REPUBLIC NOT TO APPLY COMMUNITY TREATMENT TO RECEIVERS FOR TELEVISION , FALLING WITHIN SUBHEADING 85.15 A EX III OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF , ORIGINATING IN TAIWAN AND IN FREE CIRCULATION IN THE OTHER MEMBER STATES

( ONLY THE FRENCH TEXT IS AUTHENTIC )

( 80/149/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY , AND IN PARTICULAR THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 115 THEREOF ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE APPLICATION UNDER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 115 OF THE TREATY , MADE ON 11 JANUARY 1980 BY THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT TO THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , FOR AUTHORIZATION NOT TO APPLY COMMUNITY TREATMENT TO RECEIVERS FOR TELEVISION , FALLING WITHIN SUBHEADING 85.15 A EX III OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF , ORIGINATING IN TAIWAN AND IN FREE CIRCULATION IN THE OTHER MEMBER STATES ,

WHEREAS IN FRANCE THE IMPORTATION OF THE PRODUCTS IN QUESTION ORIGINATING IN TAIWAN IS PROHIBITED ;

WHEREAS THE DISPARITIES WHICH EXIST IN THE COMMERCIAL POLICY MEASURES APPLIED IN CONNECTION WITH THESE PRODUCTS BY THE MEMBER STATES ARE CAUSING DEFLECTION OF TRADE , THEREBY PREVENTING THE EXECUTION OF THOSE COMMERCIAL POLICY MEASURES WHICH ARE IN FORCE BECAUSE OF THE DIFFICULT ECONOMIC SITUATION IN THE SECTOR CONCERNED ;

WHEREAS IT APPEARS FROM THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED THAT THERE ARE SERIOUS DIFFICULTIES IN THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONCERNED , INVOLVING A CONSIDERABLE DROP IN PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT ;

WHEREAS FURTHER INDIRECT IMPORTS , IN ADDITION TO THOSE PROPOSED , WOULD BE LIKELY TO AGGRAVATE THESE DIFFICULTIES ;

WHEREAS IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SET IN MOTION RAPIDLY THE MACHINERY FOR BRINGING ABOUT THE NECESSARY COOPERATION FROM THE OTHER MEMBER STATES ;

WHEREAS AUTHORIZATION SHOULD ACCORDINGLY BE GIVEN FOR THE APPLICATION OF PROTECTIVE MEASURES UNDER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 115 , SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN COMMISSION DECISION 71/202/EEC OF 12 MAY 1971 ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 1 THEREOF ;

WHEREAS , THE APPLICATION FOR A LICENCE WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE APPLICATION IN QUESTION DOES NOT NEED TO BE COVERED BY SUCH AN AUTHORIZATION ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE FRENCH REPUBLIC IS AUTHORIZED NOT TO APPLY COMMUNITY TREATMENT TO THE PRODUCTS INDICATED BELOW , WHERE THEY ORIGINATE IN TAIWAN AND ARE IN FREE CIRCULATION IN THE OTHER MEMBER STATES , AND IN RESPECT OF WHICH APPLICATIONS FOR IMPORT LICENCES WERE LODGED AFTER 10 JANUARY 1980 :

//

CCT HEADING NO // DESCRIPTION //

//

85.15 A EX III // RECEIVERS FOR TELEVISION //

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION SHALL APPLY UNTIL NEW OPPORTUNITIES ARISE IN FRANCE FOR THE IMPORTATION OF THESE PRODUCTS FROM TAIWAN OR UNTIL 30 SEPTEMBER 1980 , WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER .

ARTICLE 3

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE FRENCH REPUBLIC .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 18 JANUARY 1980 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

WILHELM HAFERKAMP

VICE-PRESIDENT
COMMISSION DECISION of 11 January 1980 refusing to accept the scientific character of the apparatus described as "Hewlett-Packard computing calculator, model HP 9825A" (80/139/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 3 July 1979, the Italian Government requested the Commission to invoke the procedure laid down in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as "Hewlett-Packard computing calculator, model HP 9825A" used for research in the electron-spin resonance sector and, in particular, for the study of the structure and reactivity of free radicals and of ion-pairs in solution, in the context of the study of the influence of these pairs on the mechanisms of chemical reactions, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 15 November 1979 within the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine this particular case;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a computer used for the collection, the conversion and the analysis of data;

Whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research ; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind is principally used for non-scientific activities ; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus ; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as "Hewlett-Packard computing calculator, model HP 9825A" is not considered to be a scientific apparatus.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 January 1980.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 134, 31.5.1979, p. 1. (3)OJ No L 318, 13.12.1979, p. 32.
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 51 , 23 . 2 . 1977 , P . 1 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 21 JANUARY 1980

APPROVING A PROGRAMME FOR THE FRUIT AND VEGETABLE SECTOR IN THE RHINELAND PALATINATE PURSUANT TO REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77

( ONLY THE GERMAN TEXT IS AUTHENTIC )

( 80/169/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 OF 15 FEBRUARY 1977 ON COMMON MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ARE PROCESSED AND MARKETED ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY COMMUNICATED ON 24 JULY 1979 A PROGRAMME FOR THE FRUIT AND VEGETABLE SECTOR IN THE RHINELAND PALATINATE ;

WHEREAS THE SAID PROGRAMME CONCERNS THE REORGANIZATION , RATIONALIZATION AND MODERNIZATION OF THE MARKETING OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES AND THE RATIONALIZATION OF THE FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROCESSING INDUSTRY , WITH THE AIM OF STABILIZING THE MARKET IN FRUIT AND VEGETABLES IN THE RHINELAND PALATINATE SO AS TO MAINTAIN AN APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF INCOME FOR FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRODUCERS ; WHEREAS IT THEREFORE CONSTITUTES A PROGRAMME WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 ;

WHEREAS THE PROGRAMME CONTAINS SUFFICIENT DETAILS , AS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 , WHICH INDICATE THAT THE OBJECTIVES LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 1 OF THE SAID REGULATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN RESPECT OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRODUCTION IN THE RHINELAND PALATINATE ; WHEREAS THE SCHEDULED PERIOD FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME DOES NOT EXCEED THE LIMIT LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( G ) OF THE REGULATION ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE PROGRAMME FOR THE FRUIT AND VEGETABLE SECTOR IN THE RHINELAND PALATINATE , COMMUNICATED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY ON 24 JULY 1979 PURSUANT TO REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 , IS HEREBY APPROVED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 21 JANUARY 1980 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

FINN GUNDELACH

VICE-PRESIDENT
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 249 , 10 . 11 . 1971 , P . 54 .

( 2 ) OJ NO 56 , 31 . 8 . 1960 , P . 1201/60 .

( 3 ) OJ NO L 91 , 12 . 4 . 1968 , P . 25 .

COUNCIL DECISION

OF 18 FEBRUARY 1980

REPLACING AN ALTERNATE MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND

( 80/220/EEC )

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2396/71 ( 1 ) CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE RULES OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND ( 2 ), AS AMENDED BY THE COUNCIL DECISION OF 9 APRIL 1968 ( 3 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 7 THEREOF ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE COUNCIL DECISION OF 17 APRIL 1978 APPOINTING THE MEMBERS AND ALTERNATE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 16 APRIL 1980 ,

WHEREAS ONE SEAT AS ALTERNATE MEMBER OF THE AFORESAID COMMITTEE IN THE EMPLOYERS ' REPRESENTATIVE CATEGORY HAS FALLEN VACANT FOLLOWING THE RESIGNATION OF DR PAGGI , NOTIFIED TO THE COUNCIL ON 30 JANUARY 1980 ;

HAVING REGARD TO THE NOMINATION SUBMITTED ON 30 JANUARY 1980 ,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS :

SOLE ARTICLE

DR MARIA IDA JACONE IS HEREBY APPOINTED ALTERNATE MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND IN PLACE OF DR PAGGI FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE LATTER ' S TERM OF OFFICE , WHICH RUNS UNTIL 16 APRIL 1980 .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 18 FEBRUARY 1980 .

FOR THE COUNCIL

THE PRESIDENT

G . MARCORA
COMMISSION DECISION of 25 January 1980 refusing to accept the scientific character of the apparatus described as "Microdyne-Telemetry Receiver, model 1100 AR" (80/208/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 14 June 1979, the Government of Italy requested the Commission to invoke the procedure at present laid down in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as "Microdyne-Telemetry Receiver, model 1100 AR", to be used for the reception of time signals, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 15 November 1979 within the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine this particular case;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a radio-receiver for wavelengths measuring several metres and adapted for the reception of signals transmitted by satellites ; whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research ; whereas apparatus of the same kind are principally used for the realization of non-scientific activities ; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus ; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as "Microdyne-Telemetry Receiver, model 1100 AR", is not considered to be a scientific apparatus.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 January 1980.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 134, 31.5.1979, p. 1. (3)OJ No L 318, 13.12.1979, p. 32.
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 55 , 28 . 2 . 1980 , P . 4 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 56 , 29 . 2 . 1980 , P . 22 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 28 FEBRUARY 1980

ON THE LODGING OF APPLICATIONS FOR IMPORT LICENCES IN RESPECT OF BEEF AND VEAL PRODUCTS ORIGINATING IN BOTSWANA , KENYA , MADAGASCAR AND SWAZILAND

( 80/322/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 435/80 OF 18 FEBRUARY 1980 ON THE ARRANGEMENTS APPLICABLE TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS AND CERTAIN GOODS RESULTING FROM THE PROCESSING OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ORIGINATING IN THE AFRICAN , CARIBBEAN AND PACIFIC STATES OR IN THE OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 23 THEREOF ,

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 486/80 OF 28 FEBRUARY 1980 LAYING DOWN DETAILED RULES FOR THE APPLICATION IN THE BEEF AND VEAL SECTOR OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 435/80 ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 2 ( 3 ) THEREOF ,

WHEREAS IT IS APPROPRIATE TO FIX THE QUANTITIES IN RESPECT OF WHICH IT WILL BE POSSIBLE TO APPLY FOR IMPORT LICENCES FROM 1 TO 10 MARCH 1980 ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

APPLICATIONS FOR LICENCES MAY BE SUBMITTED DURING THE FIRST 10 DAYS OF MARCH 1980 , IN RESPECT OF THE FOLLOWING QUANTITIES OF BONED BEEF AND VEAL :

- BOTSWANA:15 763 TONNES , - KENYA:118 TONNES , - MADAGASCAR:6 316 TONNES , - SWAZILAND:2 803 TONNES . ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 28 FEBRUARY 1980 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

FINN GUNDELACH

VICE-PRESIDENT
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 61 , 5 . 3 . 1977 , P . 23 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 228 , 16 . 8 . 1973 , P . 2 .

( 3 ) OJ NO L 30 , 6 . 2 . 1979 , P . 19 .

( 4 ) OJ NO L 29 , 6 . 2 . 1980 , P . 29 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 31 MARCH 1980

EXTENDING THE PERIOD OF APPLICATION OF THE SYSTEM OF AUTHORIZATION FOR TRADE IN CRUDE OIL AND/OR PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BETWEEN FRANCE AND OTHER MEMBER STATES PROVIDED FOR BY DECISION 79/126/EEC

( ONLY THE FRENCH TEXT IS AUTHENTIC )

( 80/374/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL DECISION 77/186/EEC OF 14 FEBRUARY 1977 ON THE EXPORTING OF CRUDE OIL AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FROM ONE MEMBER STATE TO ANOTHER IN THE EVENT OF SUPPLY DIFFICULTIES ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 1 THEREOF ,

AFTER CONSULTING THE GROUP OF DELEGATES FROM MEMBER STATES AS PROVIDED FOR IN DIRECTIVE 73/238/EEC ( 2 ),

WHEREAS THE PRESENT REDUCTION OF PRODUCTION AFFECTS THE EXPORTS OF CRUDE OIL TO THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS THIS DEVELOPMENT COULD BRING ABOUT DISTURBANCES IN TRADITIONAL TRADE FLOWS OF CRUDE OIL AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BETWEEN MEMBER STATES ;

WHEREAS , THEREFORE , IN ORDER TO PREVENT SUCH A SITUATION , IT IS NECESSARY TO CONTINUE TO MONITOR THESE TRADE FLOWS REGULARLY BY MEANS OF A COMMUNITY SYSTEM ;

WHEREAS , IN PARTICULAR , IN VIEW OF THE SUPPLY SITUATION IN FRANCE , PROVISION SHOULD BE MADE IN RESPECT OF TRADE INVOLVING THAT MEMBER STATE FOR A FURTHER EXTENSION OF THE SYSTEM PROVIDED FOR BY DECISION 79/126/EEC ( 3 ), AS LAST AMENDED BY DECISION 80/124/EEC ( 4 ); WHEREAS THE MEMBER STATE IN QUESTION HAS MADE A REQUEST TO THIS EFFECT ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

IN ARTICLE 2 OF DECISION 79/126/EEC AND ARTICLE 2 OF DECISION 79/135/EEC THE DATE ' 31 MARCH 1979 ' SHALL BE REPLACED BY ' 30 JUNE 1980 ' , UNLESS A CONTRARY DECISION IS TAKEN ON THE BASIS OF ARTICLE 5 OF DECISION 77/186/EEC .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE FRENCH REPUBLIC .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 3 MARCH 1980 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

GUIDO BRUNNER

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
COMMISSION DECISION of 20 March 1980 on the implementation pursuant to Directive 72/159/EEC of the reform of agricultural structures in the Kingdom of the Netherlands (Only the Dutch text is authentic) (80/394/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/159/EEC of 17 April 1972 on the modernization of farms (1), and in particular Article 18 (3) thereof,

Whereas on 22 January 1980 the Government of the Netherlands notified, pursuant to Article 17 (4) of the abovementioned Directive, its redetermination of the comparable income for 1980 within the meaning of Article 4 thereof;

Whereas Article 18 (3) of the Directive requires the Commission to determine whether, having regard to the abovementioned communication, the existing provisions in the Netherlands for the implementation of the Directive continue to satisfy the conditions for financial contribution by the Community towards common measures within the meaning of Article 15 thereof;

Whereas the determination of the comparable income for 1980 meets the requirements of the Directive, and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Structure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Having regard to the fixing of the comparable income for 1980, the provisions for the implementation of Directive 72/159/EEC in the Netherlands continue to satisfy the conditions for a Community financial contribution towards common measures within the meaning of Article 15 thereof.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 1980.

For the Commission

Finn GUNDELACH

Vice-President (1)OJ No L 96, 23.4.1972, p. 1.
COMMISSION DECISION of 14 April 1980 refusing to accept the scientific character of the apparatus described as "Collins General Purpose HF Receiver, model 651S-1" and "Collins Transmitter, model HF 8130A" (80/469/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 9 October 1979, the Italian Government requested the Commission to invoke the procedure at present laid down in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as "Collins General Purpose HF Receiver, model 651S-1", and "Collins Transmitter, model HF 8130A", intended for use in connection with stratosperic experiments in telemetry stations, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 26 February 1980 within the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine this particular case;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question consists of a high-frequency receiver and a high-frequency transmitter ; whereas it does not possess the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research ; whereas apparatus of the same kind is principally used for the realization of non-scientific activities ; whereas the use of the said apparatus in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of scientific apparatus ; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as scientific apparatus,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as "Collins General Purpose HF Receiver, model 651S-1", and "Collins Transmitter, model HF 8130A", is not considered to be a scientific apparatus.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 April 1980.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 134, 31.5.1979, p. 1. (3)OJ No L 318, 13.12.1979, p. 32.