ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4485 — MEIF II/Techem)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/01)

On 19 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
Brussels, 25-VIII-2006

SG-Greffe(2006)204783

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: COMP/M.4343 – Kraft Foods/United Biscuits

Notification of 25.07.2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1];

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 180 p. 98.

1. On 25/07/2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which Kraft Foods International Inc. („Kraft Foods“, USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking United Biscuits Iberia S.L. („UB Iberia“, Spain) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Kraft Foods: Manufacture and sale of packaged food and beverages,

- UB Iberia: manufacture and sale of biscuits, desserts, fruit juice and other food stuff.

3. Due to board representation and veto rights, already prior to this transaction Kraft Foods has (negative) control over the United Biscuits group (and hence UB Iberia) [2]. With the notified transaction, Kraft Foods intends to acquire full sole control over UB Iberia and consequently, Kraft Foods will be able to unilaterally impose strategic decisions and to determine UB Iberia’s commercial policies. As a result, the notified transaction leads to a change in the quality of control of Kraft Foods and therefore constitutes a concentration in the meaning of Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004. [3]

4. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and the scope of paragraph 5, subparagraph c of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [4].

5. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip Lowe

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] Case No. COMP/M.1920 Nabisco/United Biscuits; Case No. COMP/M.2072 Phillip Morris/Nabisco.

[3] Para. 40 of the Commission Notice on the concept of concentration.

[4] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
|COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels , 22.03.2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/201208 / 201209

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties :

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.4142 – Time Warner/CBS/JV. Notification of 24.02.2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 55 of 07.03.2006 page 56 — Candidate case for simplified procedure

1. On 24.02.2006, the Commission received the notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004, by which the undertakings Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., ultimately controlled by Time Warner Inc. (“Time Warner“ USA), and CBS Corporation (“CBS“, USA), controlled by Mr. Sumner Redstone acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of a newly created company constituting a joint venture, The CW (“CW“, USA), by way of contribution of assets.

The business activities of the undertakings and the individual concerned are:

- for Time Warner: primarily world-wide provision of online services, filmed entertainment, operation of cable systems and television networks, and publishing;

- for CBS: production and delivery of television, radio and print publishing content in the US;

- for Mr. Sumner Redstone: ownership of not only CBS but also Viacom, a company active in cable television, motion pictures and digital media platforms;

- for CW: ownership and operation of a free-to-air broadcast network in the US.

2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2] .

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32
|COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels , 31.03.2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/201437/8/9/40

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION IFIED PROCEDURE

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties::

Dear Sirs,

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4163 – Wiener Städtische / TBIH Notification of 03/03/2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C59, 11/03/2006, page 10

1. On 03/03/2006, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertaking Wiener Städtische Allgemeine Versicherung AG (“Wiener Städtische”, Austria) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertaking TBIH Financial Services Group N.V. (“TBIH”, The Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares. After the transaction, TBIH will be jointly controlled by Wiener Städtische, Kardan N.V. (“Kardan”, The Netherlands), MidOcean Partners (“MidOcean”, USA) and Englefield Capital LLP (“Englefield”, UK).

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Wiener Städtische : insurance services and other activities;

- for Kardan: investment group;

- for MidOcean: investment group;

- for Englefield: investment group;

- for TBIH: insurance services, pension funds and lending/leasing/asset management in central and eastern European states.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5 (a) of the Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

Signed Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 89/37

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4566 — Carrefour-Marinopoulos/Credicom/CMCC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 89/10)

On 22 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 65/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4507 — Givaudan/Quest International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 65/01)

On 21 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 72/28

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4503 — PBDS/Philips APM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 72/10)

On 16 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4448 — ICA Baltic/RIMI Baltic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 102/01)

On 11 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 108/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4624 — EQT/Scandic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 108/01)

On 25 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 99/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4505 — Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold/Phelps Dodge Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 99/07)

On 20 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 110/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4620 — Swisscom/Fastweb)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 110/04)

On 10 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 136/24

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4536 — Magneti Marelli/Concordia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 136/04)

On 25 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 133/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4561 — GE/Smiths Aerospace)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 133/01)

On 23 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 171/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4637 — Sachsenfonds Holding/Eastmerchant/Nikko Principal Investments)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 171/02)

On 17 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 272/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4564 — Bridgestone/Bandag)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 272/03)

On 29 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 180/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4745 — Cerberus/Promontoria/Focus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 180/03)

On 24 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 214/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4677 — Thornwood/Federal Mogul)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 214/03)

On 10 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 192/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4768 — CRH/Cementbouw)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 192/01)

On 10 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 207/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4659 — TF1/Artémis/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 207/01)

On 29 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 243/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4748 — T-Mobile/Orange)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 243/01)

On 20 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 271/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4880 — Allianz GI/Xchanging Transaction Bank/Fondsdepot Bank)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 271/01)

On 27 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 268/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4755 — Bayerische Landesbank/Hypo Alpe-Adria-Bank International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 268/01)

On 5 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 295/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4917 — GE/DOGUS/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 295/02)

On 30 November 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 272/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4868 — Avnet/Magirus EID)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 272/01)

On 5 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,