ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
COMMISSION DECISION of 23 May 1980 on the implementation of the reform of agricultural structures in the Netherlands pursuant to Council Directive 72/159/EEC (Only the Dutch text is authentic) (80/562/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/159/EEC of 17 April 1972 on the modernization of farms (1), as last amended by Directive 77/390/EEC (2), and in particular Article 18 (3) thereof,

Whereas on 21 February 1980 the Government of the Netherlands forwarded, pursuant to Article 17 (4) of the said Directive an Order concerning State aid for the relocation of farm buildings;

Whereas Article 18 (3) of Directive 72/159/EEC requires the Commission to determine whether, having, regard to the abovementioned Order, the existing provisions in the Netherlands for the implementation of the said Directive continue to satisfy the conditions for financial contribution by the Community to common measures within the meaning of Article 15 thereof;

Whereas the abovementioned Order concerning State aid for the relocation of farm buildings meets the requirements of the said Directive;

Whereas the EAGGF Committee has been consulted on the financial aspects;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agriculture Structure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Having regard to the Order concerning State aid for the relocation of farm buildings, the existing provisions for the implementation of Directive 72/159/EEC in the Netherlands continue to satisfy the conditions for financial contribution by the Community to common measures within the meaning of Article 15 of the said Directive.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Done at Brussels, 23 May 1980.

For the Commission

Finn GUNDELACH

Vice-President (1)OJ No L 96, 23.4.1972, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 145, 13.6.1977, p. 43.
COMMISSION DECISION of 11 June 1980 finding that the apparatus described as "NAC film motion analyzer, model 160 B" is not a scientific apparatus (80/621/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 20 December 1979, the Government of the United Kingdom has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as "NAC film motion analyzer, model 160 B", to be used to measure the wing-motions of flying birds, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 22 May 1980 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a film analyzer;

Whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research ; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for non-scientific activities ; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus ; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as "NAC film motion analyzer, model 160 B" is not considered to be a scientific apparatus.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 1980.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 134, 31.5.1979, p. 1. (3)OJ No L 318, 13.12.1979, p. 32.
++++

COUNCIL DECISION

OF 18 JUNE 1980

APPOINTING A MEMBER OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR WORKERS

( 80/661/EEC )

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1612/68 OF 15 OCTOBER 1968 ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR WORKERS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY ( 1 ) , AND IN PARTICULAR TO ARTICLE 27 THEREOF ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE COUNCIL DECISION OF 17 MARCH 1980 APPOINTING , FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 16 MARCH 1982 , MEMBERS AND ALTERNATE MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR WORKERS ,

WHEREAS THE COUNCIL DECIDED ON THAT OCCASION TO APPOINT AT A LATER DATE ONE PERSON TO FILL A MEMBER'S SEAT ALLOCATED TO A FRENCH NATIONAL IN THE EMPLOYERS' REPRESENTATIVES CATEGORY ;

HAVING REGARD TO THE NOMINATION SUBMITTED ON 23 MAY 1980 ,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS :

SOLE ARTICLE

MR RAYMOND LENOBLE IS HEREBY APPOINTED A MEMBER OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR WORKERS FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE COMMITTEE'S TERM OF OFFICE , WHICH RUNS UNTIL 16 MARCH 1982 .

DONE AT LUXEMBOURG , 18 JUNE 1980 .

FOR THE COUNCIL

THE PRESIDENT

C . FRACANZANI

( 1 ) OJ NO L 257 , 19 . 10 . 1968 , P . 2 .
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 128 , 19 . 5 . 1975 , P . 1 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 128 , 19 . 5 . 1975 , P . 10 .

( 3 ) OJ NO L 31 , 5 . 2 . 1976 , P . 29 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 2 JULY 1980

ON AMENDMENTS TO THE BOUNDARIES OF LESS-FAVOURED AREAS IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 3 ( 3 ) AND ( 4 ) OF COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 75/268/EEC AND LISTED IN THE ANNEX TO COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 75/270/EEC

( ONLY THE GERMAN TEXT IS AUTHENTIC )

( 80/701/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 75/268/EEC OF 28 APRIL 1975 ON MOUNTAIN AND HILL FARMING AND FARMING IN CERTAIN LESS-FAVOURED AREAS ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 2 ( 3 ) THEREOF ,

WHEREAS COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 75/270/EEC CONCERNING THE COMMUNITY LIST OF LESS-FAVOURED FARMING AREAS WITHIN THE MEANING OF DIRECTIVE 75/268/EEC ( GERMANY ) ( 2 ), AS AMENDED BY COMMISSION DECISION 76/162/EEC ( 3 ), DEFINES THE AREAS SITUATED IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY WHICH ARE PART OF THE COMMUNITY LIST OF LESS-FAVOURED FARMING AREAS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 3 ( 3 ), ( 4 ) AND ( 5 ) OF DIRECTIVE 75/268/EEC ;

WHEREAS THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY HAS MADE AN APPLICATION , PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 2 ( 1 ) OF DIRECTIVE 75/268/EEC , TO AMEND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE AREAS LISTED IN THE ANNEX TO DIRECTIVE 75/270/EEC AS FOLLOWS :

- THE CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LOCALITIES OR PARTS OF LOCALITIES OF GEBIETE ( AREAS ) 12 AND 25 WHICH ARE LISTED IN THE ANNEX TO DIRECTIVE 75/270/EEC AS AREAS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 3 ( 4 ) OF DIRECTIVE 75/268/EEC , AS AREAS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 3 ( 3 ) THEREOF ,

- THE EXTENSION OF GEBIET ( AREA ) 25 ( 1 ) WHICH IS LISTED IN THE ANNEX TO DIRECTIVE 75/270/EEC BY INCLUDING IN IT CERTAIN LOCALITIES OR PARTS OF LOCALITIES ;

WHEREAS THE ABOVEMENTIONED LOCALITIES OR PARTS OF LOCALITIES EXHIBIT THE CHARACTERISTICS AND VALUES WHICH WERE USED IN DIRECTIVE 75/270/EEC AS CRITERIA TO DEFINE THE AREAS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 3 ( 3 ) OF DIRECTIVE 75/268/EEC AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION OR INCLUSION IN THOSE AREAS IS THEREFORE JUSTIFIED ;

WHEREAS THE AMENDMENTS REQUESTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY DO NOT RESULT IN THE EFFECTIVE AMOUNT OF AGRICULTURAL LAND OF ALL THE AREAS IN THIS MEMBER STATE BEING INCREASED BY MORE THAN 0.5 % OF THE EFFECTIVE AGRICULTURAL AREA OF THIS MEMBER STATE ;

WHEREAS THE EAGGF COMMITTEE HAS BEEN CONSULTED ON THE FINANCIAL ASPECTS ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE LIST OF LESS-FAVOURED AREAS IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY CONTAINED IN THE ANNEX TO DIRECTIVE 75/270/EEC IS HEREBY AMENDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ANNEX TO THIS DECISION .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 2 JULY 1980 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

FINN GUNDELACH

VICE-PRESIDENT
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 51 , 23 . 2 . 1977 , P . 1 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 24 JUNE 1980

APPROVING A PROGRAMME TO IMPROVE THE PROCESSING OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES IN THE NETHERLANDS , PURSUANT TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77

( ONLY THE DUTCH TEXT IS AUTHENTIC )

( 80/673/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 OF 15 FEBRUARY 1977 ON COMMON MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ARE PROCESSED AND MARKETED ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS ON 30 MARCH 1979 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE NETHERLANDS NOTIFIED THE PROGRAMME TO IMPROVE THE PROCESSING OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES AND ON 17 DECEMBER 1979 PROVIDED ADDITIONAL DETAILS ;

WHEREAS THE SAID PROGRAMME CONCERNS THE RESTRUCTURING AND MODERNIZATION OF THE EXISTING PROCESSING CAPACITIES FOR FRUIT AND VEGETABLES IMPROVING THE SITUATION IN THIS SECTOR AND THE COMMERCIAL EXPLOITATION OF THE PRODUCE IN QUESTION ; WHEREAS IT THEREFORE CONSTITUTES A PROGRAMME WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 ;

WHEREAS THE PROGRAMME CONTAINS THE DETAILS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 SHOWING THAT THE OBJECTIVES LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 1 OF THE SAID REGULATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN RESPECT OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRODUCTION ; WHEREAS THE SCHEDULED TIME FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME DOES NOT EXCEED THE LIMIT LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( G ) OF THE REGULATION ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE PROGRAMME TO IMPROVE THE PROCESSING OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES PURSUANT TO REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 , COMMUNICATED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE NETHERLANDS ON 30 MARCH 1979 AND SUPPLEMENTED ON 17 DECEMBER 1979 , IS HEREBY APPROVED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 24 JUNE 1980 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

FINN GUNDELACH

VICE-PRESIDENT
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 184 , 15 . 7 . 1975 , P . 1 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 134 , 31 . 5 . 1979 , P . 1 .

( 3 ) OJ NO L 318 , 13 . 12 . 1979 , P . 32 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 7 JULY 1980

FINDING THAT THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' NICOLET DATA-ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING SYSTEM , MODEL NIC-1180 ' IS NOT A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS

( 80/716/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 ON THE IMPORTATION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF EDUCATIONAL , SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL MATERIALS ( 1 ), AS AMENDED BY REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1027/79 ( 2 ),

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2784/79 OF 12 DECEMBER 1979 LAYING DOWN PROVISIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 ( 3 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 7 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS , BY LETTER DATED 4 JANUARY 1980 , THE UNITED KINGDOM GOVERNMENT HAS REQUESTED THE COMMISSION TO INVOKE THE PROCEDURE PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 7 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2784/79 IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' NICOLET DATA-ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING SYSTEM , MODEL NIC 1180 ' , TO BE USED FOR RECORDING TIME-DEPENDENT NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SIGNALS , CARRYING OUT MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS AND REPRODUCING GRAPHICALLY THE RESULTS , SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS AND , WHERE THE REPLY IS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE , WHETHER APPARATUS OF EQUIVALENT SCIENTIFIC VALUE IS CURRENTLY BEING MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS , IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 7 ( 5 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 2784/79 , A GROUP OF EXPERTS COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL THE MEMBER STATES MET ON 24 JUNE 1980 WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE COMMITTEE ON DUTY-FREE ARRANGEMENTS TO EXAMINE THE MATTER ;

WHEREAS THIS EXAMINATION SHOWED THAT THE APPARATUS IN QUESTION IS A COMPUTER ;

WHEREAS IT DOES NOT HAVE THE REQUISITE OBJECTIVE CHARACTERISTICS MAKING IT SPECIFICALLY SUITED TO SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ; WHEREAS , MOREOVER , APPARATUS OF THE SAME KIND ARE PRINCIPALLY USED FOR NON-SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES ; WHEREAS ITS USE IN THE CASE IN QUESTION COULD NOT ALONE CONFER UPON IT THE CHARACTER OF A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS ; WHEREAS IT THEREFORE CANNOT BE REGARDED AS A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' NICOLET DATA-ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING SYSTEM , MODEL NIC-1180 ' , IS NOT CONSIDERED TO BE A SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 7 JULY 1980 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

ETIENNE DAVIGNON

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 55 , 28 . 2 . 1980 , P . 4 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 56 , 29 . 2 . 1980 , P . 22 .

( 3 ) OJ NO L 79 , 26 . 3 . 1980 , P . 23 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 18 JULY 1980

ON THE ISSUE OF IMPORT LICENCES IN RESPECT OF BEEF AND VEAL PRODUCTS ORIGINATING IN BOTSWANA , KENYA , MADAGASCAR AND SWAZILAND

( 80/771/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 435/80 OF 18 FEBRUARY 1980 ON THE ARRANGEMENTS APPLICABLE TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS AND CERTAIN GOODS RESULTING FROM THE PROCESSING OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ORIGINATING IN THE AFRICAN , CARIBBEAN AND PACIFIC STATES OR IN THE OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 23 THEREOF ,

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 486/80 OF 28 FEBRUARY 1980 LAYING DOWN DETAILED RULES FOR THE APPLICATION IN BEEF AND VEAL OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 435/80 ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 2 ( 3 ) THEREOF ,

WHEREAS REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 435/80 PROVIDES FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF ISSUING IMPORT LICENCES FOR BEEF AND VEAL PRODUCTS ; WHEREAS , HOWEVER , IMPORTS MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE QUANTITIES SPECIFIED FOR EACH OF THESE EXPORTING NON-MEMBER COUNTRIES ;

WHEREAS THE APPLICATIONS FOR IMPORT LICENCES SUBMITTED BETWEEN 1 AND 10 JULY 1980 , EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF BONED MEAT , IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2 ( 1 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 486/80 , DO NOT EXCEED , IN RESPECT OF PRODUCTS ORIGINATING FROM BOTSWANA , KENYA , MADAGASCAR AND SWAZILAND , THE QUANTITIES AVAILABLE FROM THESE STATES ; WHEREAS IT IS THEREFORE POSSIBLE TO ISSUE IMPORT LICENCES IN RESPECT OF THE QUANTITIES REQUESTED ; WHEREAS , IN THE CASE OF BOTSWANA , DECISION 80/354/EEC OF 17 MARCH 1980 ( 3 ) CURRENTLY SUBJECTS IMPORTS TO HEALTH MEASURES ;

WHEREAS THE QUANTITIES IN RESPECT OF WHICH IT WILL BE POSSIBLE TO APPLY FOR LICENCES FROM 1 AUGUST 1980 SHOULD BE FIXED ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE FOLLOWING MEMBER STATES SHALL ISSUE ON 21 JULY 1980 IMPORT LICENCES CONCERNING BEEF AND VEAL PRODUCTS , EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF BONED MEAT , ORIGINATING IN CERTAIN AFRICAN , CARIBBEAN AND PACIFIC STATES , IN RESPECT OF THE QUANTITIES AND THE COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN STATED :

1 . GERMANY :

477.7 TONNES ORIGINATING IN MADAGASCAR

156.0 TONNES ORIGINATING IN SWAZILAND

2 . UNITED KINGDOM :

176.8 TONNES ORIGINATING IN SWAZILAND .

3 . ITALY :

150.0 TONNES ORIGINATING IN MADAGASCAR .

ARTICLE 2

APPLICATIONS FOR LICENCES MAY BE SUBMITTED , IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2 ( 4 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 486/80 DURING THE FIRST 10 DAYS OF AUGUST 1980 , IN RESPECT OF THE FOLLOWING QUANTITIES OF BONED BEEF AND VEAL :

BOTSWANA:15 763.0 TONNES KENYA:118.0 TONNES MADAGASCAR:5 103.2 TONNES SWAZILAND:1 319.0 TONNES ARTICLE 3

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 18 JULY 1980 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

FINN GUNDELACH

VICE-PRESIDENT
COMMISSION DECISION of 1 August 1980 finding that the apparatus described as "TSI-LDA Burst Processor, System 1980" is not a scientific apparatus (80/830/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 11 March 1980, the British Government has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as "TSI-LDA Burst Processor, System 1980", to be used in research in order to improve the efficiency of combustion systems, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 24 June 1980 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a signal analyser;

Whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research ; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for non-scientific activities ; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus ; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as "TSI-LDA Burst Processor, System 1980" is not considered to be a scientific apparatus.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 August 1980.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 134, 31.5.1979, p. 1. (3)OJ No L 318, 13.12.1979, p. 32.
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 96 , 23 . 4 . 1972 , P . 9 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 326 , 27 . 11 . 1973 , P . 17 .

( 3 ) OJ NO L 320 , 29 . 11 . 1974 , P . 1 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 5 SEPTEMBER 1980

ON THE REIMBURSEMENT BY THE GUIDANCE SECTION OF THE EAGGF TO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF EXPENDITURE INCURRED DURING 1978 ON ANNUITIES RELATING TO MEASURES TO ENCOURAGE THE CESSATION OF FARMING AND THE REALLOCATION OF UTILIZED AGRICULTURAL AREA FOR THE PURPOSE OF STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT

( ONLY THE ENGLISH TEXT IS AUTHENTIC )

( 80/894/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 72/160/EEC OF 17 APRIL 1972 CONCERNING MEASURES TO ENCOURAGE THE CESSATION OF FARMING AND THE REALLOCATION OF UTILIZED AGRICULTURAL AREA FOR THE PURPOSES OF STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT ( 1 ), AS LAST AMENDED BY DIRECTIVE 73/358/EEC ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 12 ( 2 ) THEREOF ,

WHEREAS THE MEASURES TAKEN BY THE UNITED KINGDOM TO IMPLEMENT DIRECTIVE 72/160/EEC WERE THE SUBJECT OF A FAVOURABLE COMMISSION DECISION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 9 OF THE SAID DIRECTIVE ;

WHEREAS THE UNITED KINGDOM HAS SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENDITURE INCURRED ON ANNUITIES GRANTED DURING 1978 TO ENCOURAGE THE CESSATION OF FARMING AND THE REALLOCATION OF UTILIZED AGRICULTURAL AREA FOR THE PURPOSES OF STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT ; WHEREAS SUCH APPLICATION IS COMPLETE AND HAS BEEN SUBMITTED IN DUE FORM AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF COMMISSION DECISION 74/581/EEC OF 16 OCTOBER 1974 CONCERNING APPLICATIONS FOR REIMBURSEMENT IN RESPECT OF AID GRANTED BY THE MEMBER STATES PURSUANT TO DIRECTIVES 72/159/EEC , 72/160/EEC AND 72/161/EEC ( 3 ), AND PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT WHICH CAN BE AUTHORIZED ;

WHEREAS AN EXAMINATION OF THE FIGURES PROVIDED SHOWS THAT ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURE OF POUND ST . 35 263.20 HAS BEEN INCURRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIRECTIVE 72/160/EEC ; WHEREAS THE GUIDANCE SECTION OF THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL GUIDANCE AND GUARANTEE FUND SHOULD THEREFORE REIMBURSE 25 % THEREOF , I.E . POUND ST . 8 815.80 ;

WHEREAS A PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT OF POUND ST . 6 603.02 HAS BEEN PAID PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 12 ( 3 ) OF DIRECTIVE 72/160/EEC AND OF ARTICLE 4 ( 1 ) OF DECISION 74/581/EEC ; WHEREAS THE BALANCE OF POUND ST . 2 212.78 SHOULD THEREFORE BE PAID TO THE MEMBER STATE ;

WHEREAS THE EAGGF COMMITTEE HAS BEEN CONSULTED ON THE FINANCIAL ASPECTS AND IN PARTICULAR AS TO THE FUNDS AVAILABLE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE FINAL CONTRIBUTION BY THE GUIDANCE SECTION OF THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL GUIDANCE AND GUARANTEE FUND TOWARDS THE EXPENDITURE INCURRED BY THE UNITED KINGDOM DURING 1978 IN RESPECT OF ANNUITIES TO ENCOURAGE THE CESSATION OF FARMING AND THE REALLOCATION OF UTILIZED AGRICULTURAL AREA FOR THE PURPOSES OF STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT SHALL BE POUND ST . 8 815.80 .

THE BALANCE OF THE CONTRIBUTION I.E . POUND ST . 2 212.78 SHALL BE PAID TO THE UNITED KINGDOM .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE UNITED KINGDOM .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 5 SEPTEMBER 1980 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

FINN GUNDELACH

VICE-PRESIDENT
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 185 , 9 . 7 . 1974 , P . 15 .

COUNCIL DECISION

OF 20 OCTOBER 1980

APPOINTING TWO ALTERNATE MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SAFETY , HYGIENE AND HEALTH PROTECTION AT WORK

( 80/986/EEC )

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE COUNCIL DECISION OF 27 JUNE 1974 ON THE SETTING UP OF AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SAFETY , HYGIENE AND HEALTH PROTECTION AT WORK ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 4 THEREOF ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE COUNCIL DECISION OF 23 NOVEMBER 1978 APPOINTING THE FULL MEMBERS AND ALTERNATE MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SAFETY , HYGIENE AND HEALTH PROTECTION AT WORK FOR THE PERIOD ENDING ON 22 NOVEMBER 1981 ,

WHEREAS TWO ALTERNATE MEMBERS ' SEATS IN THE EMPLOYERS ' REPRESENTATIVES CATEGORY OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SAFETY , HYGIENE AND HEALTH PROTECTION AT WORK HAVE FALLEN VACANT FOLLOWING THE RESIGNATION OF MR PETRIE AND MR DEWSBURY , NOTIFIED TO THE COUNCIL ON 1 OCTOBER 1980 ;

HAVING REGARD TO THE CANDIDATES PROPOSED ON 1 OCTOBER 1980 ,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS :

SOLE ARTICLE

MISS A . MACKIE AND MR R . F . EBERLIE ARE HEREBY APPOINTED ALTERNATE MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SAFETY , HYGIENE AND HEALTH PROTECTION AT WORK IN PLACE OF MR PETRIE AND MR DEWSBURY FOR THE REMAINDER OF THEIR TERM OF OFFICE , WHICH RUNS UNTIL 22 NOVEMBER 1981 .

DONE AT LUXEMBOURG , 20 OCTOBER 1980 .

FOR THE COUNCIL

THE PRESIDENT

J . SANTER