HUNGARY: ACCESSION PARTNERSHIP (98/C 202/04)

1. INTRODUCTION

In the opinion which it submitted to the Council in July 1997, in accordance with the provisions of Article O of the Treaty, the Commission recommended that negotiations for accession should be opened with Hungary. This recommendation derives from the analysis contained in the opinion in which the Commission is of the view that Hungary (i) presents stable institutions, guarantees the rule of law, human rights and the protection of minorities, (ii) can be regarded as a functioning market economy able to cope with the competitive pressure and market forces within the Union in the medium term, and (iii) should be capable in the medium term of applying the acquis provided it continues its efforts on its transposition and intensifies its work on its implementation.

The Europe Agreement will remain the basis for the European Union's relations with Hungary. However the pre-accession strategy will be reinforced to enable assistance to be directed towards the specific needs of each applicant so as to provide support for overcoming particular problems identified in the opinion. As the Commission indicated in Agenda 2000: 'The reinforced pre-accession strategy has two main objectives. First, to bring together the different forms of support provided by the Union in a single framework, the Accession Partnerships, and to work together with the applicants, within this framework, on the basis of a clearly defined programme to prepare for membership, involving commitments by the applicants to particular priorities and to a calendar for carrying them out. Second, to familiarise the applicants with Union policies and procedures through the possibility of their participation in Community programmes.`

At its meeting in Luxembourg in December 1997 the European Council decided that the Accession Partnerships would be the key feature of the enhanced pre-accession strategy, mobilising all forms of assistance to the applicant countries within a single framework. This Accession Partnership has been decided by the Commission, after consulting Hungary and on the basis of the principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions which have been decided by the Council.

2. OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the Accession Partnership is to set out in a single framework the priority areas for further work identified in the Commission's opinion on Hungary's application for membership of the European Union, the financial means available to help Hungary implement these priorities and the conditions which will apply to that assistance. This Accession Partnership provides a framework for a number of policy instruments which will be used to help the candidate countries in their preparations for membership. These will include, inter alia, the National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis to be adopted by Hungary, the Joint Assessment of Economic Policy Priorities, the Pact against Organised Crime and the internal market road maps. Each of these instruments is different in nature and will be prepared and implemented according to specific procedures. They will not be an integral part of this Partnership but the priorities they contain will be compatible with it.

3. PRINCIPLES

The main priority areas identified for each candidate country relate to their ability to assume the obligations of meeting the Copenhagen criteria which state that membership requires:

- that the candidate country has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities,

- the existence of a functioning market economy, as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union,

- the ability to take on the obligations of membership, including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union.

At its meeting in Madrid, the European Council stressed the need for the candidate countries to adjust their administrative structures to ensure the harmonious operation of Community policies after accession and at Luxembourg it stressed that incorporation of the acquis into legislation is necessary, but not in itself sufficient; it is necessary to ensure that it is actually applied.

4. PRIORITIES AND INTERMEDIATE OBJECTIVES

The Commission's opinions and the Council's examination of these have highlighted the extent of the efforts which still have to be made in certain areas by the candidate countries to prepare for accession and took the view that none of these countries fully satisfies all of the Copenhagen criteria at the present time. This situation will require the definition of intermediate stages in terms of priorities, each to be accompanied by precise objectives to be set in collaboration with the countries concerned, the achievement of which will condition the degree of assistance granted and the progress of the negotiations under way with some countries and the opening of new negotiations with the others. The priorities and intermediate objectives have been divided into two groups - short and medium term. Those listed under the short term have been selected on the basis that it is realistic to expect that Hungary can complete or take them substantially forward by the end of 1998. In view of the short time span, and taking into account the administrative capacity required to achieve them, the number of priorities selected for the short term has been limited. The priorities listed under the medium term are expected to take more than one year to complete although work may and should also begin on them during 1998.

Hungary will be invited to draw up a National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis (NPAA) by the end of March which should set out a timetable for achieving these priorities and intermediate objectives and, where possible and relevant, indicate the necessary staff and financial resources.

The Accession Partnership indicates that Hungary will have to address all issues identified in the opinion. The annex provides a summary checklist of these. Incorporation of the acquis into legislation is not in itself sufficient; it will also be necessary to ensure that it is actually applied to the same standards as those which apply within the Union. In all of the areas listed below there is a need for credible and effective implementation and enforcement of the acquis.

Drawing on the analysis of the Commission's opinion and the Council's examination of this, the following short and medium-term priorities and intermediate objectives have been identified for Hungary.

4.1. Short term (1998)

- Economic reform: review and update the country's medium-term economic policy priorities within the framework of the Europe Agreement; advance structural reforms (particularly with regard to the health care system).

- Reinforcement of institutional and administrative capacity: in particular in the areas of veterinary and phytosanitary controls (particularly as regards facilities at the external borders) environment, customs policy, internal financial control and regional development.

- Internal market: including certification and standardisation (further alignment of legislative measures and conclusion of a European Conformity Assessment Agreement), State aids (adoption of legislative framework, definition of role and powers of monitoring authority, enforcement) and increased transparency through improvement of aid inventory. Enforcement of intellectual property rights and further alignment of company law. Complete alignment and increased transparency of public procurement legislation to cover fully utilities sector.

- Justice and home affairs: implementation of appropriate refugee legislation consistent with 1951 Geneva Convention, development of effective border management.

- Environment: continue transposition of framework legislation, establishment and commencement of implementation of detailed approximation programmes and implementation strategies related to individual acts. Planning and commencement of implementation of these programmes and strategies.

4.2. Medium term

- Political criteria: further efforts to improve the integration of the Roma.

- Economic reform: continue to consolidate the conditions for strong investment growth through the sustained implementation of prudent macroeconomic policies and the advancement of structural reforms.

- Economic policy: regular review of the joint assessment of economic policy priorities, within the Europe Agreement framework, focusing on satisfying the Copenhagen criteria for membership of the Union and the acquis in the area of economic and monetary policy (coordination of economic policies, submission of convergence programmes, avoidance of excessive deficits); while Hungary is not expected to adopt the euro immediately on accession, it is expected to pursue policies which aim to achieve real convergence in accordance with the Union's objectives of economic and social cohesion, and nominal convergence compatible with the ultimate goal of adoption of the euro.

- Reinforcement of institutional and administrative capacity: development of anti-fraud unit and State audit office, improved operation of the judicial system, training for the judiciary in Community law and its application; reinforcement of justice and home affairs institutions (ensuring sufficient and properly trained personnel, in particular police, border guards, ministries and courts), reform of customs and tax administrations to ensure readiness to apply the acquis, the reinforcement of food control administration and strengthening of the nuclear safety authority.

- Internal market: including further development of standardisation and conformity assessment bodies and establishment and operation of a market surveillance system, alignment of technical legislation on industrial products, further alignment of competition law, in particular for State aid, reinforcement of monitoring authorities both for competition and State aids, alignment of capital liberalisation, financial services, audiovisual policies and consumer protection, promotion of enterprise development, including SMEs, alignment with the acquis in the fields of telecommunications, consumer protection and the internal energy market.

- Justice and home affairs: including implementation of migration policy and asylum procedures as well as the fight against organised crime (in particular money laundering, drugs and trafficking in human beings) and corruption, and clarification of admission provisions for immigrants, and to align visa policy with that of the European Union and to complete alignment to international conventions, notably in view of the Schengen acquis.

- Agriculture: including alignment with the agricultural acquis (including veterinary and phytosanitary matters, in particular external border controls), attention to environmental aspects of agriculture and biodiversity. Development of the capacity to implement and enforce the common agricultural policy, in particular the fundamental management mechanisms and administrative structures to monitor the agricultural markets and implement structural and rural development measures, adoption and implementation of the veterinary and phytosanitary requirements, upgrading of certain food-processing establishments and testing and diagnostic facilities, restructuring of the agri-food sector.

- Transport: further efforts on alignment with acquis in particular in rail and road transport (technical controls), and to provide necessary investment for transport infrastructure, notably extension of trans-European networks.

- Employment and social affairs: development of appropriate labour market structures and joint review of employment policies as preparation for participation in European Union coordination; alignment of labour and occupational health and safety legislation and development of enforcement structures, in particular early adoption of the framework Directive on health and safety at work; enforcement of equal opportunities between women and men; further development of active, autonomous social dialogue; further development of social protection, undertake steps to bring public health standards into line with European Union norms.

- Environment: including the development of monitoring and implementation control structures and capacities, continuous planning and implementation of approximation programmes related to individual legal acts. A particular emphasis should be given to the waste water, waste management, air pollution and integrated industrial pollution control and risk management. Environmental protection requirements and the need for sustainable development must be integrated into the definition and implementation of national sectoral policies.

- Regional policy and cohesion: further strengthen budgetary procedures, financial instruments, monitoring and control mechanisms in order to participate in European Union structural programmes after membership.

5. MAIN INSTRUMENTS FOR COMMUNITY TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

5.1. Programming of financial resources

The Phare allocation for the period 1995 to 1997 has totalled ECU 282 million. Subject to the approval of the Phare budget for the remaining period, the Commission will confirm the allocations for 1998 and 1999. Financial proposals will be submitted to the Phare Management Committee as provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89. Joint financing by the applicant countries will be systematically required for all investment projects. The Commission will work with Hungary, the EIB and international financing institutions, in particular the EBRD and World Bank, with a view to facilitating the co-financing of projects relating to pre-accession priorities. Financial assistance from the year 2000 onwards will comprise aid for agriculture and a structural instrument which will give priority to measures similar to the Cohesion Fund. In addition Hungary will have access to funding from multi-country programmes directly related to the acquis.

The Phare programme is the main financial instrument of the reinforced pre-accession strategy. Phare's prime objective is to help prepare Central and East European countries for accession by focusing the assistance it provides on the adoption of the Community acquis and in particular on the priorities identified in this Accession Partnership and in the National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis. Each year the Commission will sign a financing memorandum with Hungary in which Hungary will undertake to meet a number of the priorities identified in this Accession Partnership and the Commission will undertake to contribute financially to their realisation. Programming of Community financial assistance will take into account the priorities and timetable of the NPAA.

In addition, the subsequent allocation of financial assistance will be closely tied to the respect by the Hungarian Government of the commitments made in the NPAA. Certain pre-accession activities can be reinforced now (e.g. support for institution building) but others, such as the financing of major investment projects designed to meet the requirements of the acquis in areas such as environment and nuclear safety will have to be programmed over a period of five to six years.

From 1998 Phare assistance will be channelled through the following types of actions:

- Institution building (around 30 %), which involves the strengthening of democratic institutions, rule of law, public administration and all entities responsible for public services in order to establish the necessary institutional and administrative structures and train the people required to apply the acquis. Institution building support will be implemented, inter alia, through, training actions, technical assistance and twinning of institutions and administrations in Hungary with relevant bodies in the Member States. Initially this twinning will focus on priority areas such as finance, agriculture, environment, justice and home affairs.

- Investment support (around 70 %), in order to make the necessary investments possible for the adaptation of Hungarian infrastructure to the Community acquis. This support will concentrate on: (i) structural actions, covering in particular agricultural restructuring, regional development and investment in human and intellectual capital, which could include Phare contributions to participation in the research and technological development framework programme; (ii) compliance with Community norms, in particular as regards environment, agriculture, industry, occupational safety and health, transport and telecommunications; (iii) co-financing of large scale infrastructure (1) and (iv) small and medium-sized enterprises development (2).

5.2. Role of international financial institutions

Cooperation between Hungary and the international financial institutions will receive a new impetus and a new focus through the Accession Partnership. The grant resources made available under the Accession Partnership will serve as seed money and a catalyst for larger amounts of development finance from the IFIs. This process will be developed by the Commission in liaison with the candidate countries, the EIB and the IFIs, in particular the EBRD and the World Bank with a view to facilitating the co-financing of projects relating to pre-accession priorities.

Under a new lending mandate covering the period 1997 to 1999, the EIB can make available ECU 3 520 million in Central and Eastern Europe. The new pre-accession facility approved by the EIB's governors in early 1998 increases this amount to ECU 7 billion. EIB loans shall be used in all sectors eligible for EIB financing to facilitate the accession process.

6. CONDITIONALITY

Community assistance will be conditional on respect by Hungary of its commitments under the Europe Agreement, further steps towards satisfying the Copenhagen criteria and progress in implementing this Accession Partnership. Failure to respect these general conditions could lead to a decision by the Council on the suspension of financial assistance on the basis of Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 622/98.

7. IMPLEMENTATION OF PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE

The provision of financial assistance to Hungary will depend on the maturity of projects proposed by the Hungarian Government for inclusion in a financing memorandum. Where projects need to be tendered the Commission will only finance those projects which are ready for tendering at the stage of the signature of the financing memorandum. In addition any previous/existing commitments in the same sector must have been fully contracted or be on track. In order to ensure efficient implementation, projects to be financed must not, in principle, fall below a threshold of ECU 2 to 3 million, in particular in the case of infrastructure projects. If these principles lead to a situation where Hungary cannot absorb its full indicative allocation, the allocation will be reduced accordingly. The difference between the indicative and final allocation will be transferred to the horizontal SME and/or the large scale infrastructure facility. No subsequent compensation of this amount will be made.

The Government of Hungary is invited to put in place an implementation structure which ensures coherence and complementarity between all types of European Union financial assistance and national resources. A national coordinator will be responsible for ensuring a close link between the general accession process and the programming of the Community financial assistance.

The Government of Hungary will establish (preferably in the Ministry of Finance) during 1998 a national fund for investment promotion and institution building functioning under the responsibility of a National Authorising Officer (NAO). As the central entity through which Phare and other forms of Community financial assistance will be channelled, the national fund will be responsible for the management of these funds under decentralised implementation in order to increase transparency and reduce dispersion of funds. It will have overall responsibility for management of funds including respect of provisions of the financing memorandum and be accountable to the Commission for the use of the funds. It will also ensure and supervise the flow of national and other co-financing resources as set out in the financing memorandum. The detailed functions and responsibilities of the national fund will be set out in the individual financing memoranda.

In cooperation with the Government of Hungary, the Commission will pursue a policy of further decentralisation of the implementation of the financial assistance where certain pre-conditions are met, and to the extent permitted by the European Communities' Financial Regulation, in particular Article 105(3). This will be done with the intention to establish, within limits and in a gradual manner, a relationship between the Commission and Hungary where responsibility is shared along the lines of the relationship existing with the Member States for implementing the Structural Funds.

In this context, the possibility of applying national procurement procedures in the tendering and contracting of Phare projects may be explored by the Commission, if so requested by the Government of Hungary, in particular in the field of investment. The Commission's decision on this matter will be taken following, inter alia, examination of the Hungarian national procurement law for respect of and compatibility with the basic provisions of the European Community's public procurement rules and its Financial Regulation, including equal participation in tenders and the provisions of Article 118. Any decision on the use of national procurement rules will be taken by the Commission on a case-by-case basis and will be confirmed in the individual financing memoranda.

The monitoring of programme implementation shall be carried out jointly with the Commission through procedures established in the individual financing memoranda. In order to ensure effective monitoring of implementation of assistance under the Phare programme, each Phare programme will incorporate quantified physical and financial objectives which will be specified in the financing memorandum. In order to gauge their effectiveness all operations financed under the Phare programme will be subject to ex-post evaluation to appraise their impact with respect to their objectives.

8. MONITORING

The implementation of the Accession Partnership will be monitored in the framework of the Europe Agreement. This will commence in 1998 before the Commission presents its first regular report to the Council reviewing the progress made by Hungary including implementation of the Accession Partnership.

The relevant sections of the Accession Partnership will be discussed in the appropriate subcommittee. The Association Committee will discuss overall developments, progress and problems in meeting its priorities and intermediate objectives as well as more specific issues referred to it from the subcommittees. The Association Committee will report to the Association Council on the implementation of the Accession Partnership.

The Phare Management Committee will ensure that financing decisions are compatible with the Accession Partnerships.

The Accession Partnership will be amended as necessary in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 622/98. The Commission will propose a review of this partnership before the end of 1999 and at regular intervals thereafter. These reviews will include consideration of the need to further specify intermediate objectives in the light of the progress made by Hungary in meeting the objectives set out in this partnership.

(1) Concerning investment projects in general, Hungary will be required to fulfil the principle of complementarity by means of contributing a minimum amount of 25 % to jointly financed projects.

(2) A horizontal facility for SMEs will be available to remedy the shortage of investment capital available to small enterprises.