ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
NoL235/34 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 26.8.76
COMMISSION DECISION
of20July1976
authorizingtheFrenchRepublicnottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttosound
recordersorreproducers ,fallingwithinsubheading85.15AIIIoftheCommon
CustomsTariff,originatinginJapanandinfreecirculationintheother
MemberStates
(OnlytheFrenchtextisauthentic)
(76/694/EEC)
thesemeasuresshouldapplyonlyuntilsucharrange­
mentsareintroduced ,
HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1
TheFrenchRepublicisauthorizednottoapply
Communitytreatmenttoimportsofthefollowing
products:
CCT
Va-miing Descriptionofgoods
No
85.15AMIRadioreceivers,whetherornotcombined
withasoundrecorderorreproducer
wheretheyoriginateinJapanandareinfreecircula­
tionintheotherMemberStates,andinrespectof
whichapplicationsforimportlicenceswerelodged
after30June1976.THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,andinparticularthefirstpara­
graphofArticle 115thereof,
Havingregardtotheapplicationunderthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115oftheTreaty,madeon13July
1976bytheFrenchGovernmenttotheCommission
bytelexfromtheofficeofitsPermanentRepresenta­
tivetotheEuropeanCommunities ,forauthorization
nottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttoradioreceivers,
whetherornotcombinedwithasoundrecorderor
reproducer ,fallingwithinsubheading85.15AIIIof
theCommonCustomsTariffandinfreecirculation
intheotherMemberStates,
WhereasaccordingtothisapplicationunderArticle
115theimportationintoFranceoftheproductsin
questionoriginatinginJapaniscurrentlysubjecttoa
six-monthlyquotaof195000sets,whichisbeingallo­
cated;
Whereasdifferencesinthecommercial policy
measuresappliedinconnectionwiththeseproducts
byFranceandbytheotherMemberStatesasregards
Japanaregivingrisetodeflectionoftrade;
Whereasthisdeflectionoftradeisobstructingthe
executionoftheabovecommercialpolicymeasures
currentlybeingappliedbyFranceasregardsJapan;
Whereasitisnotpossibleatthepresenttimetosetin
motionthemachineryforbringingabouttheneces­
sarycooperationfromtheotherMemberStates;
Whereasauthorizationshouldbegiven,foralimited
period,fortheapplicationofprotectivemeasures
underthefirstparagraphofArticle 115,subjecttothe
conditionsspecifiedintheCommissionDecisionof
12May1971('),andinparticularArticle1thereof;
Whereasuniformarrangements forimportsofthe
productsinquestioncouldbeadoptedundera
commoncommercialpolicyris-ci-risJapan;whereasArticle2
ThisDecisionshallapplyonlyuntiluniformimport
arrangements areintroducedunderacommon
commercialpolicyvis-a-visJapanoruntilnewoppor­
tunitiesarisefortheimportationoftheproductsin
questionfromJapanandinanycasenotlaterthan31
December1976.
Article3
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheFrenchRepublic.
DoneatBrussels,20July1976.
FortheCommission
ChristopherSOAMES
Vice-President
(!)O)NoL121,6.1971,p.26.
2.10.76 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities NoL270/31
COMMISSION
COMMISSION DECISION
of28July1976
extendingforsixmonthsDecision71/314/ECSCof27July1971authorizing
specialization Agreementscoveringthemanufacture ofrolled-steelproducts
andAgreementsforthesettingupofanagencytoallocateordersformerchant
steelbarsandwirerodbetweenEisenwerk-Gesellschaft Maximilianshutte mbH,
Klockner-Werke AGandStahlwerkePeine-Salzgitter AG
(OnlytheGermantextisauthentic)
(76/775/ECSC)
2.ByitsDecision76/354/ECSCof13February
1976theCommissionextendedtheapplicationofthe
firstDecisionuntil30June1976toenabletheunder­
takingsconcernedtocompletetheirnegotiationswith
theobjectofconsolidatingthroughnewAgreements
theresultsachievedwiththespecialization Agree­
mentswhichhadbeenauthorized .
3.ThoseconcernedsubmittedtotheCommission
on29June1976acontractforcooperationand
specializationAgreementsandaskedforanextension
oftheexistingAgreementsfortheperiodnecessaryto
enablethenewAgreementstobeexaminedunder
Article65oftheTreaty.
4.ThegroundsfortheextensionDecisionof13
February1976remainvalidandareaccordinglyappli­
cabletothepresentDecision.
5.Inthecircumstances anextensionforaperiodof
sixmonthsofDecision71/314/ECSCcanbeautho­
rized.THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
CoalandSteelCommunity ,andinparticularArticle
65thereof,
HavingregardtoDecision71/314/ECSCof27July
1971authorizingspecializationAgreementscovering
themanufactureofrolled-steelproductsandAgree­
mentsforthesettingupofanagencytoallocate
ordersformerchantsteelbarsandwirerodbetween
Eisenwerk-Gesellschaft Maximilianshutte mbH,
Klockner-Werke AGandStahlwerkePeine-Salzgitter
AGO),
HavingregardtoDecision76/354/ECSCof13
February1976extendingDecision71/314/ECSCuntil
30June1976(2),
Havingregardtotheapplicationfromtheundertak­
ingsconcerneddated29June1976,
Whereas :
1.ByDecision71/314/ECSCof27July1971,the
CommissiongaveanauthorizationunderArticle65of
theTreatytothefollowingsteelundertakings :HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1 Eisenwerk-Gesellschaft Maximilianshütte mbH,Sulz­
bach-Rosenberg ;
Klöckner-Werke AG,Duisburg;
StahlwerkePeine-Salzgitter AG,Peine,Decision71/314/ECSCof27July1971authorizing
specialization Agreementscoveringthemanufacture
ofrolled-steelproductsandAgreementsforthe
settingupofanagencytoallocateordersfor
merchantsteelbarsandwirerodbetweenEisenwerk­
GesellschaftMaximilianshutte mbH,Klockner-Werke
AGandStahlwerkePeine-Salzgitter AGisextended
until31December1976.forspecialization Agreementscoveringthemanufac­
tureofrolled-steelproductsandAgreementsforthe
settingupofanagencytoallocateordersfor
merchantsteelbarsandwirerod.ThisDecision
expiredon31December1975.
(')OJNoL201,5.9.1971,p.19.
(2)OJNoL95,9.4.1976,p.21.

NoL270/32 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 2.10.76
Article2
ThisDecisionisaddressedto:
Eisenwerk-Gesellschaft Maximilianshütte mbH,Sulzbach-Rosenberg ;
Klöckner-Werke AG,Duisburg;
StahlwerkePeine-Salzgitter AG,Peine.
DoneatBrussels,28July1976.
FortheCommission
R.VOUEL
MemberoftheCommission
COMMISSION DECISION of 17 September 1976 concluding the Protocol concerning commercial and economic cooperation between the European Coal and Steel Community and Canada (76/754/ECSC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, and in particular Articles 6 and 8 thereof,

Whereas the Protocol concerning commercial and economic cooperation between the European Coal and Steel Community and Canada, signed in Brussels on 26 July 1976, should be concluded on behalf of the European Coal and Steel Community,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Protocol concerning commercial and economic cooperation between the European Coal and Steel Community and Canada is hereby concluded and approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Protocol is annexed to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Commission shall give, as regards the Community, the notification provided for in Article 3 of the Protocol (1).

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 17 September 1976.

For the Commission

Christopher SOAMES

Vice-President (1)The date of entry into force of the Protocol will be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
COMMISSION DECISION of 5 October 1976 on the refusal to accept the scientific character of an apparatus known as "Integrated 100/300 Unit" (76/811/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3195/75 of 2 December 1975 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 12 May 1976, the French Government requested the Commission to determine whether or not the apparatus known as "Integrated 100/300 Unit" should be considered to be a scientific apparatus;

Whereas, in accordance with Article 4 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 3195/75, a group of experts composed of representatives of all of the Member States met on 16 September 1976 within the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine this particular case;

Whereas this examination shows that the apparatus concerned is intended to create a vacuum in an oven of 2 800 ºC in order to prepare rare earth monocrystals for examination by electronic microscope ; whereas the absence of any special device to allow of its specific use for scientific purposes does not permit it to be distinguished from standard laboratory equipment materials used for commercial and industrial purposes ; whereas pursuant to the provisions of Article 3 (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75, this apparatus cannot be considered to be a scientific apparatus,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus known as "Integrated 100/300 Unit" is not hereby considered to be a scientific apparatus.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 October 1976.

For the Commission

Finn GUNDELACH

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 316, 6.12.1975, p. 17.
12.11.76 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities NoL311/23
COMMISSION DECISION
of4November 1976
onthereimbursement bytheGuidanceSectionoftheEAGGFtotheFrench
Republicofaidsgrantedduring1974toorganization offruitandvegetable
producers
(OnlytheFrenchtextisauthentic)
(76/857/EEC)
to6ofRegulation (EEC)No449/69;whereasthe
GuidanceSectionoftheFundshouldthereforereim­
burse50%thereof,i.e.FF103184-87(18577-84u.a.).
WhereastheFundCommitteehasbeenconsultedon
thefinancialaspectsandinparticularastothefunds
available,
HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilRegulation (EEC)No
1035/72of18May1972onthecommonorganization
ofthemarketinfruitandvegetables('),aslast
amendedbyRegulation (EEC)No793/76(2),andin
particularArticle36thereof,
HavingregardtoCouncilRegulation (EEC)No
449/69of11March1969onthereimbursement of
aidgrantedbyMemberStatestoorganizations offruit
andvegetableproducers(3),andinparticularArticle7
(2)thereof.
WhereastheFrenchRepublichasmadeanapplica­
tionforreimbursement inrespectofaidgranted
during1974toorganizations offruitandvegetable
producers ;
Whereasthisapplicationisinaccordancewiththe
provisionsofCommission Regulation (EEC)No
2264/69of13November1969onapplicationsfor
reimbursement ofaidgrantedbyMemberStatesto
organizations offruitandvegetableproducers(4);
Whereasanexaminationoftheinformationprovided
showsthataidofFF206369-75(37155-68u.a.)was
grantedundertheconditionslaiddowninArticles2ThecontributionbytheGuidanceSectionoftheEuro­
peanAgriculturalGuidanceandGuaranteeFund
towardstheaidgrantedbytheFrenchRepublicto
organizations offruitandvegetableproducersduring
1974shallbeFF103184-87(18577-84u.a.).
Article2
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheFrenchRepublic .
DoneatBrussels,4November1976.
FortheCommission
P.J.LARDINOIS
MemberoftheCommission
(')O)NoI,IIS,20.5.1977.p.I.
(-')O'JNo1.91X.4.1976,p.1.
OO'JNoL61,12.?.1969,p.2.
(•')OfNoL2S"7,IvII.1969,p.
NoL287/18 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 19.10.76
COMMISSION DECISION
of8October1976
onthegrantingbytheGuidanceSectionoftheEAGGFtotheKingdomof
Denmarkofapaymentonaccountinrespectofexpenditureincurredduring
1975onaidsrelatingtotheprovisionofsocio-economic guidanceforandthe
acquisitionofoccupational skillsbypersonsengagedinagriculture
(OnlytheDanishtextisauthentic)
(76/822/EEC)
Whereasthemakingofapaymentonaccountforthe
periodinquestionshallnotprejudicethefinaldeci­
siononthecontribution fromtheFundforthesaid
period;whereastheGuidanceSectionoftheEuro­
peanAgriculturalGuidanceandGuaranteeFund
shouldthereforemakeapaymentonaccountof75%
ofthesumof119843Dkr(1597907u.a.)i.e.89882
Dkr(11984-27u.a.);
WhereastheFundCommitteehasbeenconsultedon
thefinancialaspectsandinparticularastothefunds
available,THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilDirective72/161/EECof17
April1972concerningtheprovisionofsocio­
economicguidanceforandtheacquisitionofoccupa­
tionalskillsbypersonsengagedinagriculture('),as
lastamendedbyDirective73/358/EEC(2),andin
particularArticle,14(3)thereof,
WhereasthemeasurestakenbytheKingdomof
DenmarktoimplementDirective72/161/EECwere
thesubjectofafavourableCommission Decision
pursuanttoArticle11ofthesaidDirective;
WhereasCommission Decision74/581/EECof16
October1974concerningapplicationsforreimburse­
mentinrespectofaidgrantedbytheMemberStates
pursuanttoDirectives72/159/EEC,72/160/EECand
72/161/EEC(3),laysdowninArticle4(1),thatthe
Commission ,actingonthebasisofparticulars
containedintheapplicationsforreimbursement ,shall
makeapaymentonaccountof75%oftheamount
requested ;
Whereastheapplicationforreimbursement lodgedby
theKingdomofDenmarkinrespectofaidsgranted
during1975fortheprovisionofsocio-economic guid­
anceforandtheacquisitionofoccupationalskillsby
personsengagedinagricultureiscompleteandhas
beensubmittedindueform;whereasthetotal
amountofexpenditurefortheyear1975comesto
479319Dkr(63909-20u.a.)brokendownasfollows:HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1
ThepaymentonaccountbytheGuidanceSectionof
theEuropeanAgriculturalGuidanceandGuarantee
Fundtowardstheexpenditureincurredbythe
KingdomofDenmarkduring1975inrespectofaids
relatingtotheprovisionofsocio-economic guidance
forandtheacquisitionofoccupational skillsby
personsengagedinagricultureshallbe89882Dkr
(11984-27u.a.).
Article2
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheKingdomof
Denmark .
underTitleI
underTitleIIDirective
72/161/EEC479319Dkr
(63909.20u.a.);DoneatBrussels,8October1976.
FortheCommission
P.J.LARDINOIS
MemberoftheCommissionwhereasthetotalamountofreimbursement requested
comesto119843Dkr(1597907u.a.);
(>)OJNoL96,23.4.1972,p.15.
(})OJNoL320,29.11.1974,p.1.(2)OJNoL326,27.11.1973,p.17.
29.12.76 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities NoL358/1
II
(Actswhosepublicationisnotobligatory)
COUNCIL
COUNCILDECISION
of22November1976
adoptingtheannualreportontheeconomicsituationintheCommunityandlaying
downtheeconomicpolicyguidelinesfor1977
(76/916/EEC)
WhereasthetripartiteconferenceheldinLuxembourg
on24June1976discussedindepththeproblemof
employmentandstabilityintheCommunity ,its
conclusionsbeingsetoutinajointstatement(6),
HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1
TheCouncilherebyadoptstheannualreportonthe
economicsituationintheCommunityascontainedin
SectionsI,IIandIIIoftheAnnexandlaysdownthe
guidelinestobefollowedbyeachMemberStateinits
economicpolicyfor1977,asshowninSectionsIV
andVoftheAnnex.THECOUNCILOFTHEEUROPEANCOMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilDecision74/120/EECof
18February1974ontheattainmentofahighdegree
ofconvergenceoftheeconomicpoliciesoftheMem­
berStatesoftheEuropeanEconomicCommunity(*),
asamendedbyCouncilDecision75/787/EEC(2)and
inparticularArticle4thereof,
HavingregardtotheproposalfromtheCommission ,
HavingregardtotheopinionoftheEuropean
Parliament (3),
HavingregardtotheopinionoftheEconomicand
SocialCommittee (4),
Whereas,inadoptingCouncilDecision76/646/EEC
of26July1976(5),theCouncilapprovedtheanalysis
oftheeconomicsituationsetoutintheCommission
communication of23June1976concerningin
particularthepreparationofthepublicbudgetsfor
1977;whereasinaccordancewiththatDecision,the
MemberStatesshallpursueeconomicpoliciesin
conformitywiththeguidelinesonthepreparationof
thepublicbudgetsfor1977whicharespecifiedinthe
AnnextothesaidDecision:Article2
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheMemberStates.
DoneatBrussels,22November1976.
FortheCouncil
ThePresident
W.F.DUISENBERG
(*)OJNoL63,5.3.1974,p.16.
(2)OJNoL330,24.12.1975,p.52.
(3)OJNoC293,13.12.1976,p.46.
(4)OJNoC297,16.12.1976,p.3.
(5)OJNoL229,20.8.1976,p.1. (8)OJNoC173,28.7.1976,p.1.
25.11.76 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities NoL326/23
II
(Actswhosepublicationisnotobligatory)
COMMISSION
COMMISSION DECISION
of1October1976
authorizingtheFrenchRepublicnottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttowoven
fabricsofsynthetictextilefibres(discontinuous orwaste)fallingwithin
subheading56.07AoftheCommonCustomsTariff,originatinginThailandand
infreecirculation intheotherMemberStates
(OnlytheFrenchtextisauthentic)
(76/883/EEC)
whereasauthorization shouldaccordinglybegiven,
foralimitedperiod,fortheapplicationofprotective
measures,underthefirstparagraphofArticle11.5,
subjecttotheconditionslaiddownbytheCommis­
sionDecisionof12May1971('),andinparticular
Article 1thereof;
Whereastherequestsforlicencesthatgaverisetothe
applicationunderArticle11.5neednotbecoveredby
thisauthorization inviewofthesmallquantity
involved(22metrictons),whichcouldhaveno
perceptibleeffectonthedifficultsituationofthe
industryinquestion,
HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,andinparticularthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115thereof,
Havingregardtotheapplicationunderthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115oftheTreaty,madeon22
September1976bytheFrenchGovernmenttothe
CommissionbytelexfromtheOfficeofitsPerma­
nentRepresentative totheEuropeanCommunities for
authorization nottoapplyCommunitytreatmentto
wovenfabricsofsynthetictextilefibresdiscontinuous
orwaste)fallingwithinsubheading56.07Aofthe
CommonCustomsTariff,originatinginThailandand
infreecirculationintheotherMemberStates,
WhereasFranceappliesquantitativeimportrestric­
tionstotheproductsinquestionoriginatinginThai­
land;
Whereasaccordingtoinformationsuppliedbythe
Frenchauthoritiesthereareseriouseconomicdiffi­
cultiesinthebranchofthetextileindustryinques­
tionresultinginadeclineofproductionanda
constantreductionofthenumberofworkers
employedinthatsector;
Whereasindirectimportswhichwouldbeinaddition
tothosealreadyeffectedwouldbelikelytoaggravate
theseeconomicdifficulties ;
Whereasitisnotpossibleatthepresenttimetosetin
motionthemachineryforbringingabouttheneces­
sarycooperationfromtheotherMemberStates;TheFrenchRepublicisauthorizednottoapply
Communitytreatmenttoimportsofthefollowing
products :
(XT
heading Descriptionofgoods
No
56.07AWovenfabricsofman-madefibres(discon­
tinuousorwaste):
A.Ofsynthetictextilefibres:
1.Gauzeweighingnotlessthan80
g/mJbutnotmorethan120g/m'
H.Other
(')OJNoL121,3.6.1971,p.26.

NoL326/24 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 25.11.76
Article3 wheretheyoriginateinThailandandareinfreecircu­
lationintheotherMemberStatesandinrespectof
whichapplicationsforimportlicenceswerelodged
afterthedateofthisDecision .ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheFrenchRepublic.
DoneatBrussels,1October1976.
Article2
ThisDecisionshallapplyuntilnewopportunities
ariseintheFrenchRepublicfortheimportationof
theproductsinquestionfromThailandandinany
casenotlaterthan31December1976.FortheCommission
ChristopherSOAMES
Vice-President
COMMISSION DECISION of 3 December 1976 on the implementation of the reform of agricultural structures in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg pursuant to Title II of Directive 75/268/EEC (Only the French text is authentic) (76/948/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/159/EEC of 17 April 1972 on the modernization of farms (1), and in particular Article 18 (3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 75/268/EEC of 28 April 1975 on mountain and hill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas (2), and in particular Article 13 thereof,

Whereas on 20 July 1976 the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg notified, pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 75/268/EEC in conjunction with Article 17 (4) of Directive 72/159/EEC, the ministerial decree of 5 July 1976 amending the ministerial decree of 30 January 1976 granting a compensatory allowance to farmers;

Whereas Article 18 (3) of Directive 72/159/EEC requires the Commission to decide whether, having regard to the abovementioned ministerial decree of 5 July 1976, the existing provisions for the implementation in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg of Title II of Directive 75/268/EEC, which form the subject of Commission Decision 76/698/EEC of 28 July 1976 on the implementation of the reform of agricultural structures in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg pursuant to Title II of Council Directive 75/268/EEC of 28 April 1975 (3), continue to satisfy the conditions for financial contribution by the Community to common measures referred to in Article 13 of Directive 75/268/EEC and Article 15 of Directive 72/159/EEC;

Whereas the new fixing of the compensatory allowance within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC in the said ministerial decree of 5 July 1976 is consistent with the objectives and requirements of that Directive;

Whereas the EAGGF Committee has been consulted on the financial aspects;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Structures,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The provisions for the implementation of Title II of Directive 75/268/EEC notified on 11 June 1976 by the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg continue in the light of the ministerial decree of 5 July 1976 notified on 20 July 1976, to satisfy the conditions for financial contribution by the Community to common measures as referred to in Article 13 of Directive 75/268/EEC and Article 15 of Directive 72/159/EEC.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

Done at Brussels, 3 December 1976.

For the Commission

P.J. LARDINOIS

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 96, 23.4.1972, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 128, 19.5.1975, p. 1. (3)OJ No L 236, 27.8.1976, p. 32.
NoL364/30 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 31.12.76
FIRSTCOMMISSION DECISION
of2December1976
amendingtheAnnextosecondCouncilDecision75/370/EEContheequivalenceof
seedpotatoesproducedinthirdcountries
(76/943/EEC)
1.underOrderNo1,column3,thewords
'—Landeskammer furTirol,Innsbruck'are
replacedby'—Landes-Landwirtschaftskammer
furTirol,Innsbruck';
2.underOrderNo2,thetextofcolumn3is
amendedtoreadasfollows:
'InspekojaNasienna,OkregowyInspektorat
(SeedInspectionService,RegionalInspectorates ):
—■Bialystoku (Bialystok),
—■Bydgoszozy (Bydgoszcz),
—Gdansku(Gdansk),
—Katowicach (Katowice),
—■Kielcach(Kielce),
—■Koszalinie (Koszalin),THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingthe
EuropeanEconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilDirective66/403/EECof
14June1966onthemarketingofseedpotatoes(*),
aslastamendedbyDirective76/307/EEC(2),
HavingregardtosecondCouncilDecision75/370/
EECof24June1975ontheequivalenceofseed
potatoesproducedinthirdcountries(3),asamended
byCouncilDecision76/540/EEC(4),andin
particularArticlelathereof,
WhereastheCouncildeclaredinthatDecisionthat
seedpotatoesproducedandofficiallycontrolledin
Austria,PolandandSwitzerlandaffordthesame
assurancesasseedpotatoesproducedandcontrolled
withintheCommunity ;
WhereasithasbeenfoundthatoneoftheAustrian
servicesmentionedintheAnnextotheDecisionhas
notbeencorrectlycited;
Whereasthenamesofthecompetentservicesin
Polandhaveinthemeantimebeenmodified;
WhereasthesaidAnnexshouldbeamended
accordingly ;
WhereasthemeasuresprovidedforinthisDecision
areinaccordancewiththeopinionoftheStanding
CommitteeonSeedsandPropagatingMaterialfor
Agriculture,HorticultureandForestry,—•Krakowie (Krakow),
—Lublinie(Lublin),
—Lodzi(Lodz),
—Olsztynie (Olsztyn),
—Opolu(Opole),
—■Poznaniu(Poznan),
—■Rzeszowie (Rzeszow),
—Szczecinie (Szczecin),
—Warszawie (Warszawa),
—■Wroclawiu (Wroclaw),
—■ZieloneiGorze(ZielonaGora).'
Article2
ThisDecisionshallapplyuntil30June1978.
Article3 HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1
TheAnnextothesecondCouncilDecision
75/370/EEContheequivalenceofseedpotatoes
producedinthirdcountriesisamendedasfollows:ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheMemberStates.
DoneatBrussels,2December1976.
FortheCommission
P.J.LARDINOIS
MemberoftheCommission(*)OJNo125,11.7.1966,p.2320/66.
(2)OJNoL72,18.3.1976,p.16.
(3)OJNoL164,27.6.1975,p.43.
(4)OJNoL162,23.6.1976,p.27.