ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 14 May 1982

granting authorization to the Kingdom of Denmark pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1945/81

(Only the Danish text is authentic)

(82/361/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1945/81 of 30 June 1981 restricting investment aids for pig production (1), and in particular Article 1 thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/159/EEC of 17 April 1972 on the modernization of farms (2), as last amended by Directive 81/528/EEC (3), and in particular Article 18 (3) thereof,

Whereas the Danish Government has applied for the authorization provided for in Article 1 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1945/81;

Whereas the application contains all the information specified in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2180/81 of 30 July 1981 laying down rules implementing restrictions on investment aids for pig production (4), showing that the conditions for authorization pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 1945/81 are met;

Whereas such authorization does not affect the Decision to be adopted by the Commission pursuant to Article 18 of Directive 72/159/EEC concerning the provisions adopted by the Kingdom of Denmark in applying the authorization;

Whereas the EAGGF Committee has been consulted on the financial aspects;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Structure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Kingdom of Denmark is hereby authorized to alter the number of pig places laid down in Article 1 (1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1945/81 subject to the limits and conditions laid down in that Article and in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2180/81.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark.

Done at Brussels, 14 May 1982.

For the Commission

Poul DALSAGER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 197, 20. 7. 1981, p. 31.

(2) OJ No L 96, 23. 4. 1972, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 197, 20. 7. 1981, p. 41.

(4) OJ No L 211, 31. 7. 1981, p. 28.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 7 May 1982

authorizing the Kingdom of the Netherlands to permit temporarily the marketing of field pea seed not satisfying the requirements of Council Directive 66/401/EEC

(82/344/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 66/401/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed (1), as last amended by Commission Directive 81/126/EEC (2), and in particular Article 17 thereof,

Having regard to the request submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands,

Whereas in the Netherlands the production of field pea (Pisum sativum L.), proteagineous type, of the variety Finale satisfying the requirements laid down in Directive 66/401/EEC has been insufficient in 1981 and is not adequate to supply the needs of that country;

Whereas it has not been possible to cover these needs satisfactorily by certified seed from other Member States, or even from non-member countries, satisfying all the requirements laid down in the said Directive;

Whereas the Kingdom of the Netherlands should therefore be authorized to permit, for a period expiring on 30 June 1982, the marketing of seed of the abovementioned species of a category subject to less stringent requirements;

Whereas it appears desirable also to authorize other Member States which are able to supply the Netherlands with such seed not satisfying the requirements of the Directive to permit the marketing of such seed, provided that is intended exclusively for the Netherlands;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Kingdom of the Netherlands is hereby authorized to permit, until 30 June 1982, the marketing on its territory of a maximum of 280 tonnes of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed of the category 'commercial seed' provided that the following requirements are satisfied:

(a) the seed shall belong to the variety 'Finale';

(b) the packages of seed shall be labelled with a supplier's label indicating and guaranteeing the variety of the seed;

(c) the official label shall state: 'Intended exclusively for the Netherlands'.

Article 2

The other Member States are hereby authorized to permit, subject to the conditions laid down in Article 1, the marketing in their territories of a maximum of 280 tonnes of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed, provided that such seed is intended exclusively for the Netherlands. The official label shall state: 'Intended exclusively for the Netherlands'.

Article 3

The Member States shall notify the Commission before 31 October 1982 of the quantities of seed marketed in their territories pursuant to this Decision. The Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 1982.

For the Commission

Poul DALSAGER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2298/66.

(2) OJ No L 67, 12. 3. 1981, p. 36.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 19 May 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'ABS - Electronic Motorless Magnetic Stirrer' may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/381/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 16 November 1981, the United Kingdom has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'ABS - Electronic Motorless Magnetic Stirrer', ordered 6 June 1978 and to be used for cancer research and in particular for the study of the response of tumour cells to platinum cytotoxic drug therapy, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 20 April 1982 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter; whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a magnetic stirrer;

Whereas it does not have the requisite objective characterstics making it specifically suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for non-scientific activities; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus; whereas the duty-free admission of the apparatus in question is therefore not justified,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'ABS - Electronic Motorless Magnetic Stirrer', which is the subject of an application by the United Kingdom of 16 November 1981, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 May 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 134, 31. 5. 1979, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 23 June 1982

approving the agricultural measures included in the integrated development programme for the Western Isles of Scotland (Outer Hebrides) pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1939/81)

(Only the English text is authentic)

(82/433/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1939/81 of 30 June 1981 on an integrated development programme for the Western Isles of Scotland (Outer Hebrides) (1), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas, pursuant to Article 5 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1939/81, the Government of the United Kingdom on 30 March 1982 forwarded a detailed description of the agricultural measures to be applied under the integrated development programme for the Western Isles of Scotland;

Whereas, pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 1939/81, the Commission on 14 May 1982 approved the integrated development programme;

Whereas the description of the agricultural measures meets the conditions laid down in Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 1939/81 and shows that they fit into the integrated development programme and are likely to contribute to the attainment of its objectives;

Whereas the EAGGF Committee has been consulted on the financial aspects;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Structure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The agricultural measures included in the integrated development programme for the Western Isles of Scotland (Outer Hebrides) and forwarded by the Government of the United Kingdom on 30 March 1982 pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 1939/81 are hereby approved.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 1982.

For the Commission

Poul DALSAGER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 197, 20. 7. 1981, p. 6.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 11 June 1982

repealing Decision 70/41/EEC on adaptation of the methods of administrative cooperation introduced for the purpose of applying Article 9 (2) of the EEC Treaty to the new rules applicable in the field of Community transit

(82/418/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 10 (2) thereof,

Whereas Commission Decision 70/41/EEC (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Greece, introduced the DD3 movement certificate to certify the Community nature of goods moving between two points within the Community and crossing the territory of a third country through which they have not been transported directly;

Whereas the provisions of that Decision are now covered by Council Regulation (EEC) No 754/76 of 25 March 1976 on the customs treatment applicable to goods returned to the customs territory of the Community (2) and by the Agreements concluded between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation and between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Austria on the application of the rules on Community transit (3);

Whereas this Decision has thus ceased to serve any purpose and should be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 70/41/EEC is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 1 January 1983.

However, DD3 movement certificates issued prior to this date may, so long as they are valid, be submitted in support of declarations made after the said date in respect of goods to which the certificates relate.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 13, 19. 1. 1970, p. 13.

(2) OJ No L 89, 2. 4. 1976, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 294, 29. 12. 1972, pp. 1 and 86.
*****

COUNCIL DECISION

of 19 July 1982

on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Indonesia concerning imports of manioc from Indonesia and from other supplier countries which are members of the General Agreement on tariffs and trade (GATT)

(82/496/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission,

Whereas, in the light of Community market trends for certain agricultural products, measures should be taken to achieve greater stability on the market, in particular in respect of manioc;

Whereas, to that end, negotiations were conducted in accordance with Article XXVIII of GATT with an aim of suspending temporarily the Community's tariff concession in respect of imports of products falling within subheading 07.06 A of the Common Customs Tariff;

Whereas in those negotiations agreement has been reached with Indonesia in its capacity as principal supplier;

Whereas the Agreement allows the Community to restrict the quantities of products falling within subheading 07.06 A of the Common Customs Tariff which may be imported under the levy which is fixed at a maximum of 6 % ad valorem,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Indonesia concerning imports of manioc from Indonesia and from other supplier countries which are members of GATT is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the person empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 1982.

For the Council

The President

K. OLESEN
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 13 July 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'Nicolet - Digital Oscilloscope, model Explorer III' may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/517/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 7 January 1982, Germany has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'Nicolet - Digital Oscillo- scope, model Explorer III', ordered on 12 June 1981 and to be used for the study into hydrodynamic excitation forces on a medium grill in a multiple-stay axial flow turbine and in particular for the recording of measurement signals, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 14 May 1982 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is an oscilloscope; whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for non-scientific activities; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus; whereas the duty-free admission of the apparatus in question is therefore not justified,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'Nicolet - Digital Oscilloscope, model Explorer III', which is the subject of an application by Germany of 7 January 1982, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 134, 31. 5. 1979, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 5 July 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'Aminco - Spectrofluorometer, model J 4-8970' may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/481/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 29 December 1981, Belgium has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'Aminco - Spectrofluorometer, model J 4-8970', ordered 8 September 1978 and to be used for research in the field of the micro and submicro analysis of plant phenolic and related compounds and also for determining the activity of the N-feruloyglycine deferulase enzyme, should be considered to be a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 14 May 1982 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a spectrofluorometer; whereas its objective technical characteristics such as the resolution power of the spectrum and the use to which it is put make it specially suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for scientific activities; whereas it must therefore be considered to be a scientific apparatus;

Whereas, however, on the basis of information received from Member States, apparatus of scientific value equivalent to the said apparatus, capable of being used for the same purposes, are currently being manufactured in the Community; whereas this applies, in particular, to the apparatus 'SFR 100' manufactured by Baird Atomic Ltd, East Street, UK-Braintree, Essex and to the apparatus 'JY 3 C' manufactured by Jobin Yvon, 16-18, rue du Canal, F-91163 Longjumeau Cédex,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'Aminco - Spectrofluorometer, model J 4-8970', which is the subject of an application by Belgium of 29 December 1981, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 July 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 134, 31. 5. 1979, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 27 July 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'ATL - Duplex System, model Mark V' may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/548/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 608/82 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 25 January 1982, the Netherlands have requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'ATL - Duplex System, model Mark V', ordered on 1 August 1980 and to be used for research on the early detection of atherosclerotic vascular wall changes and in particular on the carotid arteries, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 2 July 1982 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a detector; whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for nonscientific activities; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus; whereas the duty-free admission of the apparatus in question is therefore not justified,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'ATL - Duplex System, model Mark V', which is the subject of an application by the Netherlands of 25 January 1982, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 74, 18. 3. 1982, p. 4.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.