Commission Decision

of 31 March 2000

approving a single programming document of Community structural assistance under Objective 1 in certain parts of northern Finland, namely the region of Lapland and the subregions of Kaustinen, Saarijärvi, Viitasaari, Ii, Koillismaa, Nivala-Haapajärvi and Siikalatva

(notified under document number C(2000) 779)

(Only the Finnish and Swedish texts are authentic)

(2002/684/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds(1), and in particular Article 15(5) thereof,

After consultation of the Committee on the Development and Conversion of Regions, the Committee pursuant to Article 147 of the Treaty, the Committee on Agricultural Structures and Rural Development and the Committee on Structures for Fisheries and Aquaculture,

Whereas:

(1) Article 13 et seq. of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 lay down the procedure for preparing and implementing single programming documents.

(2) Article 15(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 provides that, after consultation with the partners referred to in Article 8 of the Regulation, the Member State may submit to the Commission a development plan which is treated as a draft single programming document, and which contains the information referred to in Article 16 of the Regulation.

(3) Under Article 15(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the Commission, on the basis of the regional development plan submitted by the Member State and within the partnership established in accordance with Article 8 of the Regulation, is to take a decision on the single programming document, in agreement with the Member State concerned and in accordance with the procedures laid down in Articles 48 to 51.

(4) The Finnish Government submitted to the Commission on 12 October 1999 an acceptable draft single programming document for the region of Lapland and the subregions of Kaustinen, Saarijärvi, Viitasaari, Ii, Koillismaa, Nivala-Haapajärvi and Siikalatva, fulfilling the conditions for Objective 1 pursuant to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999. The draft contains the information listed in Article 16 of the Regulation, and in particular a description of the priorities selected and an indication of the financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guidance Section, and the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG).

(5) The date of submission of the draft which was considered acceptable by the Commission constitutes the date from which expenditure under the plan is eligible. Under Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, it is necessary to lay down the final date for the eligibility of expenditure.

(6) The rural development measures to be financed by the EAGGF are governed, in particular as regards accounting and the measures' compatibility and consistency with common agricultural policy measures, by Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain regulations(2).

(7) The single programming document has been drawn up in agreement with the Member State concerned and within the partnership.

(8) The Commission has satisfied itself that the single programming document is in accordance with the principle of additionality.

(9) Under Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the Commission and the Member State are required to ensure, in a manner consistent with the principle of partnership, coordination between assistance from the Funds and from the EIB and other existing Financial Instruments.

(10) The EIB has been involved in drawing up the single programming document in accordance with the provisions of Article 15(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 and has declared itself prepared to contribute to its implementation with the estimated loan amounts indicated in this Decision in conformity with its statutory provisions.

(11) The financial contribution from the Community available over the entire period and its year-by-year breakdown are expressed in euro. The annual breakdown must be consistent with the relevant financial perspective. Under Article 7(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the Community contribution has already been indexed at a rate of 2 % per year. Under Articles 7(7) and 44(2) of the Regulation, the Community contribution may be reviewed at mid-term, and not later than 31 December 2004, to take account of the effective level of inflation and the allocation of the performance reserve,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The single programming document for Community structural assistance under Objective 1 in certain parts of Northern Finland, namely the region of Lapland and the subregions of Kaustinen, Saarijärvi, Viitasaari, Ii, Koillismaa, Nivala-Haapajärvi and Siikalatva, for the period 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2006 is hereby approved.

Article 2

1. In accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the single programming document includes the following elements:

(a) the strategy and priorities for the joint action of the Community Structural Funds and the Member State; their specific quantified targets; the ex ante evaluation of the expected impact, including on the environmental situation, and the consistency of the priorities with the economic, social and regional policies and the employment strategy of Finland.

The priorities are as follows:

(1) business development;

(2) rural development;

(3) development of know-how and employment;

(4) technical assistance;

(b) a summary description of the measures planned to implement the priorities, including the information needed to check compliance with the State aid rules under Article 87 of the Treaty;

(c) the indicative financing plan specifying for each priority and each year the financial allocation envisaged for the contribution from each Fund and the total amounts of eligible public or equivalent expenditure and estimated private funding in the Member State. The total contribution from the Funds planned for each year for the single programming document is consistent with the relevant financial perspective;

(d) the provisions for implementing the single programming document including designation of the managing authority, a description of the arrangements for managing the single programming document and the use to be made of global grants, a description of the systems for monitoring and evaluation, including the role of the Monitoring Committee, and the arrangements for the participation of the partners in that Committee;

(e) the ex ante verification and information on the transparency of financial flows;

(f) information on the resources required for preparing, monitoring and evaluating the single programming document.

2. The indicative financing plan puts the total cost of the priorities selected for the joint action by the Community and the Member State at EUR 642808000 for the whole period and the financial contribution from the Structural Funds at EUR 321404000.

The resulting requirement for national resources of EUR 321404000 from the public sector and EUR 410251000 from the private sector can be partly met by Community loans from the European Investment Bank and other lending instruments.

Article 3

1. The total assistance from the Structural Funds granted under the single programming document amounts to EUR 321404000.

The procedure for granting the financial assistance, including the financial contribution from the Funds for the various priorities included in the ingle programming document, is set out in the financing plan annexed to this Decision.

2.

>TABLE>

Article 4

This Decision is without prejudice to the Commission's position on aid schemes falling within Article 87(1) of the Treaty that are included in this assistance and which have not yet been approved by the Commission. Submission of the application for assistance, the programme complement or a request for payment by the Member State does not replace the notification required by Article 88(3) of the Treaty.

Community financing of State aid falling within Article 87(1) of the Treaty, granted under aid schemes or in individual cases, requires prior approval by the Commission under Article 88 of the Treaty, except where the aid falls within the de minimis rule or is exempted under an exemption regulation adopted by the Commission under Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 of 7 May 1998 on the application of Articles 92 and 93 [now Articles 87 and 88] of the Treaty establishing the European Community to certain categories of horizontal State aid(3). In the absence of such exemption or approval, aid is illegal and subject to the consequences set out in the procedural regulation for State aid, and its part-financing would be treated as an irregularity within the meaning of Article 38(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999.

Consequently, the Commission will not accept requests for interim and final payments under Article 32 of the Regulation for measures being part-financed with new or altered aid, as defined in the procedural regulation for State aid, granted under aid schemes or in individual cases, until such aid has been notified to and formally approved by the Commission.

By way of derogation from the preceding paragraphs, Articles 51 and 52 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 shall apply in the context of rural development part-financed by the ERDF.

Article 5

The date from which expenditure shall be eligible is 12 October 1999. The closing date for the eligibility of expenditure shall be 31 December 2008. This date is extended to 30 April 2009 for expenditure incurred by bodies granting assistance under Article 9(l) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999.

Article 6

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Finland.

Done at Brussels, 31 March 2000.

For the Commission

Michel Barnier

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 80.

(3) OJ L 142, 14.5.1998, p. 1.