ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 6 August 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'Packard - Auto-Gamma Spectrometer, model, 5912' may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/582/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975, on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 608/82 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 27 January 1982, the Federal Republic of Germany has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'Packard - Auto-Gamma Spectrometer, model 5912', ordered on 31 March 1980 and to be used for the study, by using radioactive isotopes, of iron metabolism and its interaction with other heavy metals, of the water and electrolyte transfer in rats' colons and of the behaviour of Na+ channels from an electrophorus, should be considered to be a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 15 July 1982 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas, this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a gamma counter; whereas its objective technical characteristics such as the number of channels and the use to which it is put make it specially suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for scientific activities; whereas it must therefore be considered to be a scientific apparatus;

Whereas, however, on the basis of information received from Member States, apparatus of scientific value equivalent to the said apparatus, capable of being used for the same purposes, are currently being manufactured in the Community; whereas this applies, in particular, to the apparatus 'CG4000 couplé à IN45' manufactured by Roche bioéléctronique Kontron, 2, avenue du Manet, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'Packard - Auto-Gamma Spectrometer, model 5912', which is subject of an application by the Federal Republic of Germany of 27 January 1982, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 August 1982.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 74, 18. 3. 1982, p. 4.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 30 July 1982

determining the world market price for peas and field beans used for human consumption

(82/562/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2036/82 of 19 July 1982 adopting general rules concerning special measures for peas and field beans (1), and in particular Article 2 (1) thereof,

Whereas in accordance with Regulation (EEC) No 2036/82 of 19 July 1982, the world market price for peas and field beans used for human consumption is to be determined on the basis of offers made on the world market, disregarding those which cannot be considered representative of actual market trends; whereas in cases where no offer can be used for determining the world market price, this price is determined from prices recorded on the markets of the principal exporting countries; whereas in cases where no offer can be used for determining the world market price, this price is fixed at a level equal to the guide price for the products in question;

Whereas in accordance with Article 4 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2049/82 of 20 July 1982 on the detailed rules for determining the world market price for peas and field beans (2), the average world market price should be established per 100 kilograms of products in bulk, delivered at Rotterdam, of sound quality as defined in Article 2 (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1432/82 (3); whereas only the most favourable offers should be used for establishing this price which concerns the deliveries closest in distance, excluding those relating to products being transported by ship;

Whereas for the offers and prices which do not comply with the conditions laid down above, the necessary adjustments should be made and in particular those referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 2036/82;

Whereas the world market price may be different for peas and for field beans;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Dried Fodder,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The world market price referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 2036/82 shall be 25;40 ECU per 100 kilograms.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 1982.

For the Commission

Poul DALSAGER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 219, 28. 7. 1982, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 219, 28. 7. 1982, p. 36.

(3) OJ No L 162, 12. 6. 1982, p. 31.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 10 September 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'Apollo - Tunable CO2 Laser, model 560' may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/649/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 608/82 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 26 February 1982, the Federal Republic of Germany has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'Apollo - Tunable CO2 Laser, model 560', ordered on 8 May 1979 and to be used for research in the field of atmospheric optics and optronics and in particular as transmitter in a heterodyne radar system, should be considered to be a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community,

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 15 July 1982 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a laser;

Whereas its objective technical characteristics, such as the emission field, and the use to which it is put make it specially suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for scientific activities; whereas it must therefore be considered to be a scientific apparatus;

Whereas, however, on the basis of information received from Member States, apparatus of scientific value equivalent to the said apparatus, capable of being used for the same purposes, are currently being manufactured in the Community; whereas this applies, in particular, to the apparatus 'Serie 6000' manufactured by Fairlight Technische en Wetenschappelijke Apparaten BV, Jan Luykenstraat 23, NL-1007 AA Amsterdam,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'Apollo - Tunable CO2 Laser, model 560', which is the subject of an application by the Federal Republic of Germany of 26 February 1982, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 September 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 74, 18. 3. 1982, p. 4.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 27 September 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'Gentry-Phillipson Oxygen Microbomb Calorimeter' may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/681/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 608/82 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 23 March 1982, the United Kingdom has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'Gentry-Phillipson Oxygen Microbomb Calorimeter', ordered on 4 February 1981 and to be used for ecological research and teaching within a zoological department, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 16 July 1982 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a calorimeter; whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for non-scientific activities; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus; whereas the duty-free admission of the apparatus in question is therefore not justified,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'Gentry-Phillipson Oxygen Microbomb Calorimeter', which is the subject of an application by the United Kingdom of 23 March 1982, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 September 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 74, 18. 3. 1982, p. 4.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.
*****

COUNCIL DECISION

of 8 October 1982

appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Nursing Training

(82/698/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to Council Decision 77/454/EEC of 27 June 1977 setting up an Advisory Committee on Nursing Training (1), and in particular Articles 3 and 4 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 79/85/EEC of 15 January 1979 appointing the members and alternates of the Advisory Committee on Training in Nursing for the period 15 January 1979 to 14 January 1982 (2),

Whereas each of the Governments of the Member States has submitted a list of candidates for the replacement or renewal of the term of office of these members and alternate members,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following have been appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Nursing Training for the period 8 October 1982 to 7 October 1985.

A. Experts from the practising profession

1.2.3 // // Member // Alternate member // Belgium: // Mr Geenen Ludo // Mrs Fierens-Gevaert // Denmark: // Mrs Andersen Inge // Mrs Bankov Lis // Germany: // Mrs Weinrich Rosemarie // Mrs Mueller Irene // Greece: // Mrs Papamikrouli Stavroula // Mrs Roussou Chariklia // France: // Mrs Sarrouilhe Renée // Mrs Ferrua-Muyl // Ireland: // Miss T. C. Taaffe // Mr N. F. Gallagher // Italy: // Miss Fiori Liliana // Mrs Demanega Pallocchia Luciana // Luxembourg: // Miss Kremmer Yvonne // Miss Wagener Mariette // Netherlands: // Mrs A. J. Levert // Mrs J. Vink 1979, p. 25.

B. Experts from the establishments providing training in nursing

1.2.3 // // Member // Alternate member // Belgium: // Mrs Motte Liliane // Mrs Dervoigne Marthe // Denmark: // Mrs Andersen Ida // Mrs Rohde Kirsten Vibeke // Germany: // Mrs Peretzki Ulrike // Mr Liebsch Holger // Greece: // Mrs Stratigaki Eleni // Mrs Kotsabassaki Stella // France: // Miss Badouaille // Miss Sibiril Yvonne // Ireland: // Miss I. Leydon // Mr T. Kennedy // Italy: // Miss Preite Ceccacci Maria Rita // Sister Colombo Luigia Giuditta // Luxembourg: // Mr Gruneisen René // Miss Thill Josée // Netherlands: // Mr W. J. Smeets // Mrs A. Bronswijk // United Kingdom: // Miss S. Collins // Mr J. J. Walsh

C. Experts from the competent authorities of the Member State

1.2.3 // // Member // Alternate member // Belgium: // Mrs Simoens-Desmet // Mr Brusseleers Jan // Denmark: // Mrs Madsen Inger Margrethe // Mr Rasmussen Bent // Germany: // Mr Kurtenbach Hermann // Mr Erdmann // Greece: // Mrs Nikopoulou-Chryssafi Panayota // Mrs Kechaidou Georgia // France: // Mrs Loraux Nicole // Mr Petit François // Ireland: // Miss K. Keane // Miss M. Deegan // Italy: // Mr Mazzoti Guiseppe // Mrs Belli Vittoria // Luxembourg: // Mr Bosseler Guy // Miss Schol Danielle // Netherlands: // Mrs C. J. M. Nieland // Mrs E. J. Dorama-Fokkens // United Kingdom: // Mrs P. Allan // Miss W. W. Thomson

Done at Brussels, 8 October 1982.

For the Council

The President

H. GROVE // United Kingdom: // Miss S. Quinn // Miss M. Bull

(1) OJ No L 176, 15. 7. 1977, p. 11. (2) OJ No L 18, 25. 1.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 15 November 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'Ithaco - Heterodyne Lock-in Amplifier, model Dynatrac 391A' may be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/800/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 608/82 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 7 April 1982, the Federal Republic of Germany has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'Ithaco - Heterodyne Lock-in Amplifier, model Dynatrac 391A', ordered on 13 November 1979 and to be used for the study of the chemisorption on refractory metals and in particular for the detection and the determination of small and vanishingly small quantities of absorbed gases, should be considered to be a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 21 September 1982 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is an amplifier;

Whereas its objective technical characteristics such as the sensibility in relation to sound and the use to which it is put make it specially suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for scientific activities; whereas it must therefore be considered to be a scientific apparatus;

Whereas, on the basis of information received from Member States, apparatus of equivalent scientific value capable of use for the same purpose is not currently manufactured in the Community; whereas, therefore, duty-free admission of this apparatus is justified,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'Ithaco - Heterodyne Lock-in Amplifier, model Dynatrac 391A', which is the subject of an application by the Federal Republic of Germany of 7 April 1982, may be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 November 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 74, 18. 3. 1982, p. 4.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 4 November 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'FPS - Array Processor, model AP-120B' may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/778/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 608/82 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 29 April 1982, the Federal Republic of Germany requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'FPS - Array Processor, model AP-120B', ordered in March 1980 and to be used for the determination of the properties of atomic voids in thermal equilibrium by measurement of the resistance fluctuation of metals and in particular for rapid signal analysis and processing of measurement spectra, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 21 September 1982 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is an array processor;

Whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for non-scientific activities; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus; whereas the duty-free admission of the apparatus in question is therefore not justified,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'FPS - Array Processor, model AP-120B', which is the subject of an application by the Federal Republic of Germany of 29 April 1982, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 November 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 74, 18. 3. 1982, p. 4.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.
*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 30 November 1982

establishing that the apparatus described as 'SPEX - Compudrive Czerny-Turner Spectrometer, model 1704' may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(82/842/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 608/82 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 9 June 1982, the United Kingdom requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as 'SPEX - Compudrive Czerny-Turner Spectrometer, model 1704', ordered on 27 January 1982 and to be used for research in plasma emission spectroscopy with microwave and radio-frequency sources and in particular for the measurement of selected wavelengths of light emitted by the plasma sources employed, should be considered to be a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 22 October 1982, within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements, to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a spectrometer;

Whereas its objective technical characteristics, such as the resolution power, and the use to which it is put make it specially suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for scientific activities; whereas it must therefore be considered to be a scientific apparatus;

Whereas, however, on the basis of information received from Member States, apparatus of scientific value equivalent to the said apparatus, capable of being used for the same purposes, are currently being manufactured in the Community; whereas this applies, in particular, to the apparatus 'JY38P' manufactured by Jobin Yvon, 16-18, rue du Canal, F-91163 Longjemeau,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as 'SPEX - Compudrive Czerny-Turner Spectrometer, model 1704', which is the subject of an application by the United Kingdom of 9 June 1982, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 1982.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 74, 18. 3. 1982, p. 4.

(3) OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.