ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 51 , 23 . 2 . 1977 , P . 1 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 1 APRIL 1981

APPROVING A PROGRAMME ON THE MARKETING OF NON-EDIBLE HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS IN BELGIUM PURSUANT TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77

( ONLY THE DUTCH AND FRENCH TEXTS ARE AUTHENTIC )

( 81/278/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 OF 15 FEBRUARY 1977 ON COMMON MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ARE PROCESSED AND MARKETED ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT FORWARDED ITS PROGRAMME ON THE MARKETING OF NON-EDIBLE HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS ON 14 OCTOBER 1980 ;

WHEREAS THE SAID PROGRAMME RELATES TO THE CREATION , EXTENSION AND RATIONALIZATION OF FACILITIES FOR THE COLLECTION , SORTING , PROCESSING , STORING , PACKAGING , SALE AND TRANSPORTATION AS WELL AS FOR THE AUCTIONS OF NON-EDIBLE HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS WITH THE AIM OF CREATING MARKETING CONDITIONS WHICH ASSURE GROWERS A LONG TERM , SECURE MARKET FOR THEIR PRODUCTS ; WHEREAS IT CONSTITUTES THEREFORE A PROGRAMME WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 ;

WHEREAS THE PROGRAMME CONTAINS THE DETAILS REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 , SHOWING THAT THE OBJECTIVES LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 1 OF THE SAID REGULATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN RESPECT OF THE NON-EDIBLE HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS SECTOR IN BELGIUM ; WHEREAS THE SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME DOES NOT EXCEED THE TIME LIMIT LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( G ) OF THIS REGULATION ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE PROGRAMME ON THE MARKETING OF NON-EDIBLE HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS FORWARDED BY THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 ON 14 OCTOBER 1980 IS HEREBY APPROVED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 1 APRIL 1981 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

POUL DALSAGER

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 149 , 5 . 7 . 1971 , P . 2 .

COUNCIL DECISION

OF 12 MAY 1981

APPOINTING AN ALTERNATE MEMBER OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS

( 81/347/EEC )

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1408/71 OF 14 JUNE 1971 ON THE APPLICATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEMES TO EMPLOYED PERSONS AND THEIR FAMILIES MOVING WITHIN THE COMMUNITY ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 82 THEREOF ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE COUNCIL DECISION OF 15 OCTOBER 1979 APPOINTING THE MEMBERS AND ALTERNATE MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 14 OCTOBER 1981 ,

WHEREAS ONE SEAT AS AN ALTERNATE MEMBER OF THE AFORESAID COMMITTEE IN THE GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES CATEGORY HAS FALLEN VACANT FOLLOWING THE RESIGNATION OF MR DUPUIS , NOTIFIED TO THE COUNCIL ON 28 APRIL 1981 ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE NOMINATION SUBMITTED ON 28 APRIL 1981 ,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS :

SOLE ARTICLE

MR C . DE NEVE IS HEREBY APPOINTED AN ALTERNATE MEMBER OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS IN PLACE OF MR DUPUIS FOR THE REMAINDER OF HIS TERM OF OFFICE , WHICH RUNS UNTIL 14 OCTOBER 1981 .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 12 MAY 1981 .

FOR THE COUNCIL

THE PRESIDENT

G . BRAKS
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 302 , 31 . 12 . 1972 , P . 28 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 26 , 31 . 1 . 1977 , P . 81 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 24 APRIL 1981

ON HEALTH PROTECTION MEASURES IN RESPECT OF CERTAIN REGIONS OF BULGARIA

( 81/315/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 72/462/EEC OF 12 DECEMBER 1972 ON HEALTH AND VETERINARY INSPECTION PROBLEMS UPON IMPORTATION OF BOVINE ANIMALS AND SWINE AND FRESH MEAT FROM THIRD COUNTRIES ( 1 ), AS LAST AMENDED BY DIRECTIVE 77/98/EEC ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLES 7 AND 15 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS IT IS LAID DOWN IN ARTICLES 6 AND 14 OF DIRECTIVE 72/462/EEC THAT MEMBER STATES SHALL NOT AUTHORIZE IMPORTATION OF BOVINE ANIMALS OR SWINE OR FRESH MEAT OF BOVINE ANIMALS , SWINE , SHEEP OR GOATS FROM NON-MEMBER COUNTRIES WHERE VACCINATION AGAINST EXOTIC FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE HAS TAKEN PLACE IN THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS ;

WHEREAS ARTICLES 7 AND 15 OF THE DIRECTIVE PROVIDE THAT THE PROHIBITIONS LAID DOWN IN ARTICLES 6 AND 14 MAY BE LIMITED TO A PART OF THE TERRITORY OF A NON-MEMBER COUNTRY ;

WHEREAS IT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED THAT VACCINATION AGAINST EXOTIC FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE IS CARRIED OUT IN THE REGIONS MITCHOURINE , MALKO TARNOVO , GROUDOVO , ELHOVO AND SVILENGRAD OF BULGARIA ;

WHEREAS , WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ABOVEMENTIONED REGIONS VACCINATION AGAINST EXOTIC FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE HAS NOT BEEN CARRIED OUT IN BULGARIA IN THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS ;

WHEREAS THE CENTRAL VETERINARY AUTHORITIES OF BULGARIA HAVE GIVEN ASSURANCES THAT BOVINE ANIMALS , SWINE AND FRESH MEAT OF BOVINE ANIMALS , SWINE , SHEEP AND GOATS FROM THE ABOVEMENTIONED REGIONS WILL NOT BE EXPORTED TO THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING VETERINARY COMMITTEE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE PROHIBITION PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 6 ( B ) OF DIRECTIVE 72/462/EEC IN RESPECT OF VACCINATION AGAINST EXOTIC FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE SHALL ONLY APPLY TO THE REGIONS MITCHOURINE , MALKO TARNOVO , GROUDOVO , ELHOVO AND SVILENGRAD OF BULGARIA .

ARTICLE 2

THE PROHIBITION PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 14 ( 2 ) ( B ) OF DIRECTIVE 72/462/EEC IN RESPECT OF VACCINATION AGAINST EXOTIC FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE SHALL ONLY APPLY TO THE REGIONS MITCHOURINE , MALKO TARNOVO , GROUDOVO , ELHOVO AND SVILENGRAD OF BULGARIA .

ARTICLE 3

THIS DECISION SHALL APPLY WITH EFFECT FROM 1 MAY 1981 .

ARTICLE 4

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 24 APRIL 1981 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

POUL DALSAGER

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 156 , 23 . 6 . 1979 , P . 29 .

( 2 ) THE MEMBERS OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FOR FISHERIES ARE LISTED IN OJ NO C 264 , 19 . 10 . 1979 , P . 3 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 27 MAY 1981

ON THE APPOINTMENT OF TWO MEMBERS TO THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FOR FISHERIES

( 81/416/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION DECISION 79/572/EEC OF 8 JUNE 1979 RELATING TO THE INSTITUTION OF A SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FOR FISHERIES ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 4 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS THE ACCESSION OF GREECE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES HAS MADE IT NECESSARY TO APPOINT TWO NEW MEMBERS TO THE COMMITTEE ;

WHEREAS THE APPOINTMENTS OF THE NEW MEMBERS SHOULD EXPIRE ON THE SAME DATE AS THOSE OF THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ( 2 ),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS :

SOLE ARTICLE

N . TSIMENIDES AND M . KANAKAS ARE APPOINTED MEMBERS OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FOR FISHERIES FOR THE PERIOD EXPIRING ON 11 SEPTEMBER 1981 .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 27 MAY 1981 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

GEORGES CONTOGEORGIS

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 51 , 23 . 2 . 1977 , P . 1 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 12 JUNE 1981

APPROVING A PROGRAMME CONCERNING VEGETABLE PROCESSING IN BELGIUM PURSUANT TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77

( ONLY THE DUTCH AND FRENCH TEXTS ARE AUTHENTIC )

( 81/480/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 OF 15 FEBRUARY 1977 ON COMMON MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ARE PROCESSED AND MARKETED ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT FORWARDED ITS PROGRAMME CONCERNING VEGETABLE PROCESSING ON 14 OCTOBER 1980 ;

WHEREAS THE SAID PROGRAMME RELATED TO THE RATIONALIZATION AND MODERNIZATION OF VEGETABLE PROCESSING FACILITIES AS WELL AS THE ADAPTATION OF THE RELEVANT PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY WITH THE AIM OF MODERNIZING AND ADAPTING THE PROCESSING STRUCTURE WITH A VIEW TO INCREASING ITS RENTABILITY ; WHEREAS IT CONSTITUTES THEREFORE A PROGRAMME WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 ;

WHEREAS THE PROGRAMME CONTAINS THE DETAILS REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 , SHOWING THAT THE OBJECTIVES LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 1 OF THE SAID REGULATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN BELGIUM IN RESPECT OF THIS SECTOR ; WHEREAS THE SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME DOES NOT EXCEED THE TIME LIMIT LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( G ) OF THIS REGULATION ;

WHEREAS APPROVAL OF THE PROGRAMME DOES NOT AFFECT THE DECISIONS TO BE TAKEN PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 14 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 CONCERNING COMMUNITY AID FOR PROJECTS IN PARTICULAR AS REGARDS VERIFYING THAT MARKETING OUTLETS FORESEEN IN THE PROGRAMME ARE IN FACT AVAILABLE FOR THE PROJECTED NEW PROCESSING CAPACITY IN THE FROZEN VEGETABLE SECTOR ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE PROGRAMME CONCERNING VEGETABLE PROCESSING FORWARDED BY THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 ON 14 OCTOBER 1980 IS HEREBY APPROVED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 12 JUNE 1981 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

THE PRESIDENT

GASTON THORN
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 51 , 23 . 2 . 1977 , P . 1 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 10 JUNE 1981

APPROVING A PROGRAMME RELATING TO PROCESSING AND MARKETING IN THE POTATO SECTOR OF IRELAND PURSUANT TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77

( ONLY THE ENGLISH TEXT IS AUTHENTIC )

( 81/456/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 OF 15 FEBRUARY 1977 ON COMMON MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ARE PROCESSED AND MARKETED ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS ON 22 SEPTEMBER 1980 THE IRISH GOVERNMENT FORWARDED THE PROGRAMME RELATING TO PROCESSING AND MARKETING IN THE POTATO SECTOR AND ON 23 OCTOBER 1980 AND 9 FEBRUARY 1981 PROVIDED ADDITIONAL DETAILS ;

WHEREAS THIS PROGRAMME RELATES TO INVESTMENT IN THE POTATO SECTOR CONCERNING

- THE IMPROVEMENT OF HANDLING AND STORAGE FACILITIES ,

- THE CREATION OF NEW GRADING AND PACKING FACILITIES ,

- THE IMPROVEMENT OF DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING ,

- THE CREATION OF NEW PROCESSING FACILITIES

WITH THE AIM OF MAKING THIS SECTOR MORE EFFICIENT , IMPROVING QUALITY AND PRESENTATION AND THUS DEVELOPING FARMING IN THIS SECTOR ; WHEREAS IT IS THEREFORE A PROGRAMME WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 ;

WHEREAS APPROVAL OF THE PROGRAMME DOES NOT AFFECT THE DECISIONS TO BE TAKEN PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 14 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 CONCERNING COMMUNITY AID FOR PROJECTS , IN PARTICULAR AS REGARDS VERIFYING THAT MARKETING OUTLETS FORESEEN IN THE PROGRAMME ARE IN FACT AVAILABLE FOR THE PROJECTED NEW PROCESSING CAPACITY ;

WHEREAS THE PROGRAMME CONTAINS THE DETAILS REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 , SHOWING THAT THE OBJECTIVES LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 1 OF THAT REGULATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN RESPECT OF THE SECTOR CONCERNED ; WHEREAS THE SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME DOES NOT EXCEED THE TIME LIMIT LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( G ) OF THIS REGULATION ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE PROGRAMME RELATING TO PROCESSING AND MARKETING IN THE POTATO SECTOR PURSUANT TO REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 , SUBMITTED BY THE IRISH GOVERNMENT ON 22 SEPTEMBER 1980 AND SUPPLIED ON 23 OCTOBER 1980 AND 9 FEBRUARY 1981 , IS HEREBY APPROVED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO IRELAND .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 10 JUNE 1981 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

THE PRESIDENT

GASTON THORN
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 51 , 23 . 2 . 1977 , P . 1 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 24 JUNE 1981

APPROVING A GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG PROGRAMME ON EQUIPMENT FOR WINE PRODUCTION IN THE MOSELLE VALLEY PURSUANT TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77

( ONLY THE FRENCH TEXT IS AUTHENTIC )

( 81/511/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 OF 15 FEBRUARY 1977 ON COMMON MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ARE PROCESSED AND MARKETED ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS THE GOVERNMENT OF LUXEMBOURG COMMUNICATED THE PROGRAMME ON EQUIPMENT FOR WINE PRODUCTION IN THE MOSELLE VALLEY ON 31 MARCH 1981 ;

WHEREAS THE SAID PROGRAMME RELATES TO THE MODERNIZATION AND THE EXPANSION OF THE CAPACITY OF FACILITIES FOR THE RECEPTION , PROCESSING , STORAGE AND VINIFICATION AS WELL AS FOR BOTTLING , LABELLING AND DISPATCH , WITH THE AIM OF IMPROVING WINE QUALITY AND THUS IMPROVING PRODUCERS ' INCOMES ; WHEREAS IT THEREFORE CONSTITUTES A PROGRAMME WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 ;

WHEREAS APPROVAL OF THE PROGRAMME DOES NOT AFFECT DECISIONS TO BE TAKEN PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 14 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 IN RESPECT OF COMMUNITY FINANCE FOR PROJECTS WHICH DO NOT RELATE PRIMARILY TO THE PROCESSING OF BASIC PRODUCTS OBTAINED IN LUXEMBOURG ;

WHEREAS THE PROGRAMME CONTAINS SUFFICIENT DETAILS , REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 , INDICATING THAT THE OBJECTIVES LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 1 OF THE SAID REGULATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN RESPECT OF THE CONCERNED SECTOR ; WHEREAS THE SCHEDULED TIME FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME DOES NOT EXCEED THE LIMIT LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( G ) OF THIS REGULATION ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DECISION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE PROGRAMME ON EQUIPMENT FOR WINE PRODUCTION IN THE MOSELLE VALLEY , COMMUNICATED BY THE LUXEMBOURG GOVERNMENT ON 31 MARCH 1981 PURSUANT TO REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 355/77 , IS HEREBY APPROVED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 24 JUNE 1981 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

THE PRESIDENT

GASTON THORN
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 257 , 15 . 10 . 1968 , PP . 8 AND 9 .

COUNCIL DECISION

OF 6 JULY 1981

REPLACING A MEMBER OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR WORKERS

( 81/497/EEC )

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1612/68 OF 15 OCTOBER 1968 ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT OF WORKERS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY ( 1 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 27 THEREOF ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE COUNCIL DECISION OF 17 MARCH 1980 APPOINTING , FOR THE PERIOD ENDING ON 16 MARCH 1982 , MEMBERS AND ALTERNATE MEMBERS TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR WORKERS ,

WHEREAS THE COUNCIL WAS INFORMED ON 9 APRIL 1981 THAT A MEMBER ' S SEAT ON THE ABOVE COMMITTEE HAD FALLEN VACANT IN THE WORKERS ' REPRESENTATIVES CATEGORY AS A RESULT OF THE DEATH OF MR GRASMAN ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE NOMINATION SUBMITTED ON 3 JUNE 1981 ,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS :

SOLE ARTICLE

MR H . HOFSTEDE IS HEREBY APPOINTED MEMBER OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR WORKERS IN PLACE OF MR GRASMAN FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE LATTER ' S TERM OF OFFICE , WHICH RUNS UNTIL 16 MARCH 1982 .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 6 JULY 1981 .

FOR THE COUNCIL

THE PRESIDENT

G . HOWE
COMMISSION DECISION of 6 July 1981 establishing that the apparatus described as "Finnigan Incos 2000 data system" may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties (81/579/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 19 December 1980, Belgium has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as "Finnigan Incos 2000 data system", to be used in the framework of a pharmacological study of the role and formation of prostaglandins and other metabolites of arachidonic acid in parts of the body and their involvement in pathological processes, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 28 April 1981 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a computer;

Whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specially suited to scientific research ; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for non-scientific activities ; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus ; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus, whereas the duty-free admission of the apparatus in question is therefore not justified,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as "Finnigan Incos 2000 data system" which is the subject of an application by Belgium of 19 December 1980 may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 1981.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission (1) OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 134, 31.5.1979, p. 1. (3) OJ No L 318, 13.12.1979, p. 32.
Commission Decision

of 6 July 1981

establishing that the apparatus described as "Ortho-Cytofluorograf, system 50" may be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties

(81/552/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials [1], as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 [2],

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 [3], and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 6 January 1981, the United Kingdom has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as "Ortho-Cytofluorograf, system 50", to be used for research into the microbial structure and in particular for measuring light scatter and fluorescence from particles, should be considered to be a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 28 April 1981 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is an analysis system; whereas its objective technical characteristics, such as the very high resolution power, and the use to which it is put make it specially suited to scientific research; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for scientific activities; whereas it must therefore be considered to be a scientific apparatus;

Whereas, on the basis of information received from Member States, apparatus of equivalent scientific value capable of use for the same purpose is not currently manufactured in the Community; whereas, therefore, duty-free admission of this apparatus is justified,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION

Article 1

The apparatus described as "Ortho-Cytofluorograf, system 50" which is the subject of an application by the United Kingdom of 6 January 1981, may be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 1981.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz Narjes

Member of the Commission

[1] OJ No L 184, 15. 7. 1975, p. 1.

[2] OJ No L 134, 31.5. 1979, p. 1.

[3] OJ No L 318, 13. 12. 1979, p. 32.

--------------------------------------------------
COMMISSION DECISION of 23 July 1981 establishing that the apparatus described as "General Electric-CT/T8800 scanner system", may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties (81/673/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1027/79 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 of 12 December 1979 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (3), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 28 January 1981, Denmark has requested the Commission to invoke the procedure provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79 in order to determine whether or not the apparatus described as "General Electric-CT/T8800 scanner system", to be used for the investigation of circulation disorders in the brain, heart and kidneys and in particular those relating to blood clots in the brain and the heart and also for the investigation of the lymphatic system, should be considered as a scientific apparatus and, where the reply is in the affirmative, whether apparatus of equivalent scientific value is currently being manufactured in the Community;

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2784/79, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 26 May 1981 within the framework of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements to examine the matter;

Whereas this examination showed that the apparatus in question is a tomograph;

Whereas it does not have the requisite objective characteristics making it specifically suited to scientific research ; whereas, moreover, apparatus of the same kind are principally used for non-scientific activities ; whereas its use in the case in question could not alone confer upon it the character of a scientific apparatus ; whereas it therefore cannot be regarded as a scientific apparatus ; whereas the duty-free admission of the apparatus in question is therefore not justified,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as "General Electric-CT/T8800 scanner system", which is the subject of an application by Denmark of 28 January 1981, may not be imported free of Common Customs Tariff duties.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 July 1981.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission (1) OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 134, 31.5.1979, p. 1. (3) OJ No L 318, 13.12.1979, p. 32.