ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
Brussels, 11.12.2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/207605

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam, Dear Sir,

Subject: Case No COMP/M.4448 – ICA Baltic / Rimi Baltic

Notification of 02.11.2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C275, 11.11.2006, p.13

1. On November 2, 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking ICA Baltic AB, a 100% subsidiary of ICA AB (together “ICA”, Sweden), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation sole control of the joint venture Rimi Baltic AB (“Rimi”, Sweden), between ICA and Ruokakesko OY (“Kesko”, Finland), by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for ICA: retail sales of daily consumer goods;

- for Rimi: retail sales of daily consumer goods in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph d, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 16/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4470 — Apollo Group/Jacuzzi Brands)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 16/02)

On 17 January 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;
|COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels , 24.03.2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/201263 SG-Greffe(2006) D/201264 SG-Greffe(2006) D/201265

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4130 – ENI/ GRUPO AMORIM/ CGD/ GALP Notification of 20.02.2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 51, 01.03.2006, page 5.

1. On 20/02/2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertakings ENI Portugal Investment (“ENI”) belonging to the group ENI S.p.A. (Italy), Amorim Energia, B.V. (“Amorim Energia”) controlled by Amorim Holding II SGPS, S.A. (Portugal) and Caixa Geral de Depósitos Group (“CGD”, Portugal) acquire, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation, joint control of the undertaking Galp Energia, SGPS, S.A. (“GALP”) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for ENI: exploration, production, refining, marketing and transportation of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum products and petrochemicals, power generation and engineering and construction of energy plants and infrastructure;

- for Amorim: production and distribution of cork and cork related products, real estate, forestry and financial services;

- for CGD: retail and corporate banking services, investment banking and asset management;

- for GALP: exploration, production, refining, marketing and storage and transportation of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum products and petrochemicals, power co-generation.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5 subparagraph b, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission (signed) Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 126/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4478 — KKR/Goldman Sachs/KION)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 126/04)

On 20 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
|COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels , 02.02.2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/200481

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties | |

| |

Dear Sirs,

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4080 – G+J/Sanoma/JV Notification of 22.12.2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 5 of 10.01.2006 on page 5

1. On 22.12.2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertakings G+J International Publishing Holding GmbH (“G+J“, Austria) belonging to the Bertelsmann Group and Sanoma Magazines International B.V. (“SMI“, Netherlands) belonging to the Sanoma WSOY group acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertakings Burda d.o.o. (“Burda Slovenia“, Slovenia), Burda National d.o.o. (“Burda Croatia“, Croatia), Izdavacka Kuca Burda d.o.o. (“Burda SMG“, Serbia-Montenegro), Adria Magazin d.o.o. (“AMC“, Croatia), Sanoma Magazines Zagreb d.o.o. (“Sanoma Zagreb“, Croatia) and Sanoma Magazines SMG d.o.o. (“Sanoma SMG“, Serbia-Montenegro), by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture (“JV“, Austria).

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for G+J: creation, production and publication of magazines;

- for SMI: creation, production and publication of magazines;

- for JV: publication of magazines in the Eastern Adriatic region.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5(a)(ii) and 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

(signed)

Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 27/18

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4415 — Motorola/Symbol)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 27/04)

On 8 January 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (fax No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4598 — Sagard/Cognetas/Groupe Saint-Gobain Desjoncqueres:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 72/29

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4547 — KKR/Permira/Prosiebensat.1)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 72/12)

On 22 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
Brussels, 02.03.2007

SG-Greffe(2007) D/201017

To the notifying parties

Dear Madams and Sirs,

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4539 – TPG/Silver Lake/Sabre

Notification of 26.01.2007 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities No. C 24, 02.02.2007, page 6.

1. On 26.01.2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking TPG Partners V, L.P. ("TPG"; US) and Silver Lake Partners II, L.P. ("SLP"; US) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertaking Sabre Holdings Corporation ("Sabre"; US) by way of purchase of shares.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

For TPG: private equity fund;

For SLP: private equity firm;

For Sabre: travel distribution business.

2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2].

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission,

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1.

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32.

--------------------------------------------------
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 92/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4607 — INM/Providence/CAP II/APN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 92/11)

On 12 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 72/27

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4585 — BMW Intec/Dekra Südleasing Services)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 72/08)

On 23 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 94/20

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4500 — Nemak/TK Aluminum ‘A’)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 94/06)

On 3 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 116/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4608 — Siemens/UGS Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 116/03)

On 27 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 114/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4346 — NTN/SNR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 114/03)

On 27 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 131/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4666 — KKR/First Data)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 131/01)

On 1 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 125/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4655 — Gilde/Parcom/Nedschroef)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 125/01)

On 22 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 149/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4689 — Wingas/HydroWingas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 149/01)

On 19 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 145/11

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4704 — Bridgepoint/Gambro Healthcare)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 145/05)

On 26 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 159/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4720 — Doughty Hanson/Axcom)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 159/03)

On 5 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 186/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4639 — Gabetti Property Solutions/Marcegaglia/Pirelli Real Estate/Italia Turismo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 186/01)

On 31 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 217/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4706 — Superior Essex/Invex)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 217/01)

On 26 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 219/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4780 — WL Ross/C&A Automotive Interior Businesses)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 219/02)

On 23 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 220/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4787 — Rhenus/TMI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 220/03)

On 28 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 246/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4742 — Oxbow/SSM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 246/02)

On 7 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,