ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 206/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3497 — PFIZER/CAMPTO)

(2004/C 206/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3497. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 227/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3418 — GENERAL DYNAMICS/ALVIS)

(2004/C 227/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 May 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 214/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/3402 — SIEMENS/3i/AGUTH/XTRAMIND)

(2004/C 214/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3402. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 13/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3652 — Charterhouse/TDF)

(2005/C 13/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.
| |Brussels, 17/12/2004

SG-Greffe(2004) D/205934

To the notifying parties

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3646 – MABSA/Belgian State/BIAC/JV Notification of 18.11.2004 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 292, 30.11.2004

1. On 18.11.2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (“ECMR”) by which the Luxembourg based undertaking Macquarie Airports Brussels S.A. (“MABSA”), which belongs to the Australian Macquarie Group, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of Brussels International Airport Company N.V./S.A. (“BIAC”), together with the Belgian State, by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for MABSA : purchase vehicle corporation,

- for Macquarie Group: banking, mostly in Australia, and

- for BIAC : owner and operator of Brussels National Airport, located in Zaventem.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

Neelie KROESMember of the Commission signed

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] Available on DG COMP website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 9/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3655 — Cerberus/Peguform)

(2005/C 9/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 16 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
| |Brussels, 22.12.2004

SG-Greffe(2004) D/206332-7

To the notifying parties

Dear Sirs,

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3620-Codan et al/NAI/JV Notification of 25.11.2004 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 298, date 03.12.2004, page 3.

1. On 25.11.2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertakings Forsikringsselskabet Codan A/S (“Codan”, Denmark), which is controlled by Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc (UK), TrygVesta A/S (“Tryg”, Denmark), Topdanmark Forsikring A/S (“Topdanmark”, Denmark), Norway Energy & Marine Insurance ASA (“Nemi”, Norway), Tryggingamidstödin HF (“Trygginga”, Iceland) and Converium Ltd (“Converium”, Switzerland), which is controlled by Converium Holding Ltd (Switzerland), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control in a newly created undertaking Nordic Aviation Insurance Ltd (“NAI”, Denmark) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Codan : general insurance company,

- for Tryg: general insurance company,

- for Topdanmark: general insurance company,

- for Nemi: insurance company with a focus on insurance for hydro energy providers, marine insurance and fish farming,

- for Trygginga: insurance company offering non-life products,

- for Converium: reinsurance, life and non-life re-insurance,

- for NAI: aviation insurance company.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraphs a and c of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

Neelie KROES Member of the Commission signed

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] Available on DG COMP website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 9/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3651 — APAX/Cinven/CBR Group)

(2005/C 9/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
|COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Information, Communication and Media |

Brussels , 20.08.2004

SG-Greffe(2004) D/203616

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties

Dear Sirs,

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.3529 – Siemens / BBC Technology Notification of 19 July 2004 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 192, 28 July 2004, page 31

1. On 19 July 2004, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertaking Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (“Siemens”, Germany), through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Siemens Holdings plc (“Siemens Holdings”) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council the undertaking BBC Technology Holdings Limited (“BBC T”, UK), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the British Broadcasting Corporation by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

– for Siemens: global provider of electronic engineering and electronic products and services

– for BBC T: provider of technology equipment, internet solutions and consulting services to the BBC and to others in the media industry

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5 (c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EEC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed Mario MONTI Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] Adopted by the Commission on 20 July 2004 and available on DG COMP website:http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf
| |Brussels, 17-XI-2004

SG-Greffe(2004) D/205255

To the notifying parties

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3602-Jabil/Consumer Electronics Poland Notification of 14.10.2004 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 261, 23.10.2004, page 7

Dear Madam and Sir,

1. On 14/10/2004 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which Jabil Circuit Netherlands B V (‘Jabil’) controlled by Jabil Circuit Inc (USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Philips Consumer Electronics Industries Poland Sp.zoo (‘PCEP’) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Jabil: provision of electronic manufacturing services to electronics services

- PCEP: assembly of colour televisions.

After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No139/2004[2].

For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

Mario MONTI Member of the Commission

signed

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] Available on DG COMP website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3556 — Fortis/BCP)

(2005/C 61/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 19 January 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3556. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3690 — CNP/Capitalia/Fineco Vita)

(2005/C 42/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 February 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3690. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/3760 — AXA Private Equity/Lariviere)

(2005/C 94/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 11 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3760. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
| |Brussels, 03/03/2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/200935

To the notifying parties |

Dear Madam and Sirs,

Subject : Case No. COMP/M. 3723 – EQT/ISS/HEALTHCARE/CAREPARTNER JV Notification of 3 February 2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. 38, of 15/02/2005, p. 13.

1. On 3 February 2005 , the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertaking EQT III Limited, which belongs to the EQT Group (UK), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the businesses of ISS Health Care AB (“Health Care”, Denmark) and Care Partner Sverige AB (“Care Partner”, Sweden), which are currently solely controlled by ISS Global A/S (“ISS”, Denmark), belonging to the ISS A/S Group, by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for EQT III: private equity fund;

- for ISS: mainly facility services, such as cleaning services;

- Health Care: management of local hospitals, mainly in Sweden;

- Care Partner: services in the care for elderly and functionally disabled in Scandinavia.

2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No139/2004[2].

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

(signed)Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] Available on DG COMP website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
| |Brussels, 21.04.2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/201895

To the notifying parties

Dear Sirs,

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3748 – MITSUBISHI TOKYO / UFJ Notification of 22/03/2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C79, 01/04/2005, p.14

1. On 22/03/2005 , the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertakings Mitsubishi Tokyo Financial Group, Inc (“MTFG”, Japan) and UFJ Holdings, Inc (“UFJ”, Japan), enter into a full merger within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a) of the Council Regulation.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for MTFG : Provision of financial services, including banking, assets management and securities.

- for UFJ : Provision of financial services, including banking, assets management and securities.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
| |Brussels, 23/03/2005

SG-Greffe(2005) D/201480/1

To the notifying parties :

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3708 – Apollo / DirecTV / Hughes Network Systems

Notification of 23/02/2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004[1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities No. C 55, 04.03.2005, page 2.

1. On 23/02/2005, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertakings Apollo Group Inc. (“Apollo”), USA, and DirecTV Group Inc. (“DirecTV”), USA, belonging to News Corporation group, acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the newly created undertaking Hughes Network Systems LLC (“HNS”), USA, by way of purchase of shares.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for undertaking Apollo : Investment fund;

- for undertaking DirecTV : Provision of digital television entertainment, broadband satellite networks and services, global video and data broadcasting;

- for undertaking HNS: Broadband satellite networks and services, consumer satellite terminals and mobile satellite networks and equipment.

2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004[2].

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission,

(signed) Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1.

[2] Available on DG COMP website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION