ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
15.6.77 NoL147/48 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities
COMMISSION DECISION
of10May1977
authorizingtheItalianRepublictopermittemporarilythemarketingofseed
notcomplyingwithrequirements ofCouncilDirective70/458/EEC
(77/402/EEC)
territoryofamaximumof13*3tonnesoffennelseed
(FoeniculumvulgareP.Mill)ofthecategory'standard
seed'subjecttolessstringentrequirementswith
regardtominimumgerminationcapacitylaiddown
inAnnexIItoDirective70/458/EEC,providedthat
thefollowingrequirementsaresatisfied:
(a)thegerminationcapacityisatleast50%ofpure
seed;
(b)theofficiallabelshallbearthefollowingendorse­
ments:
—'minimumgerminationcapacity50%',
—'intendedexclusivelyforItaly'.
Article2
TheotherMemberStatesareauthorizedtoperjnit,
subjecttotheconditionslaiddowninArticle1,the
marketingintheirterritoriesofamaximumof13-3
tonnesoffennelseedprovidedthatsuchseedis
intendedexclusivelyforItaly.Theofficiallabelshall
state:'intendedexclusivelyforItaly'.
Article3
TheMemberStatesshallnotifytheCommission
before1November1977ofthequantitiesofseed
marketedintheirterritoriespursuanttothisDecision.
TheCommission shallinformtheotherMember
Statesthereof.
Article4
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheMemberStates.THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilDirective70/458/EECof29
September1970onthemarketingofvegetable
seed('),aslastamendedbyCouncilDirective
76/307/EECof15March1976(2),andinparticular
Article33thereof,
HavingregardtotherequestmadebytheItalian
Republic,
WhereasinItalytheproductionoffennelseed
complyingwithrequirementsofthesaidDirectivehas
beeninsufficientin1976andisnotadequateto
supplytheneedsofthatcountry;
Whereasithasnotbeenpossibletocovertheseneeds
satisfactorilybysuchseedfromotherMemberStates
orevenfromthirdcountries ;
WhereastheItalianRepublicshouldthereforebeauth­
orizedtopermit,foraperiodexpiringon31July
1977,themarketingofseedoftheabovementioned
speciesofacategorysubjecttolessstringentrequire­
ments;
Whereasitappearsalsodesirabletoauthorizeother
MemberStateswhichareabletosupplytheItalian
Republicwiththisseednotcomplyingwithrequire­
mentsoftheDirectivetopermitthemarketingof
suchseedprovidedthatitisintendedexclusivelyfor
Italy;
WhereasthemeasuresprovidedforinthisDecision
areinaccordancewiththeopinionoftheStanding
CommitteeonSeedsandPropagatingMaterialfor
Agriculture,HorticultureandForestry,
HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1
TheItalianRepublicisauthorizedtopermitfora
periodexpiringon31July1977themarketingonitsDoneatBrussels,10May1977.
FortheCommission
FinnGUNDELACH
Vice-President
(')OJNoL225,12.10.1970,p.7.
(2)OJNoL72,18.3.1976,p.16.
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 184 , 15 . 7 . 1975 , P . 1 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 316 , 6 . 12 . 1975 , P . 17 .

II

( ACTS WHOSE PUBLICATION IS NOT OBLIGATORY )

COMMISSION

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 24 JUNE 1977

EXCLUDING FROM ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES THE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' SEARLE MARK III LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTER '

( 77/443/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 ON THE IMPORTATION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF EDUCATIONAL , SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL MATERIALS ( 1 ),

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 OF 2 DECEMBER 1975 LAYING DOWN PROVISIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLES 4 AND 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS , BY LETTER DATED 3 FEBRUARY 1977 , THE GERMAN GOVERNMENT REQUESTED THE COMMISSION TO INVOKE THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN ARTICLES 4 AND 5 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' SEARLE MARK III LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTER ' SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS , AND WHERE THE REPLY IS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE , WHETHER APPARATUS OF EQUIVALENT SCIENTIFIC VALUE IS CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS , IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 4 ( 5 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 , A GROUP OF EXPERTS COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL OF THE MEMBER STATES MET ON 3 JUNE 1977 WITHIN THE COMMITTEE ON DUTY-FREE ARRANGEMENTS TO EXAMINE THIS PARTICULAR CASE ;

WHEREAS THIS EXAMINATION SHOWS THAT THE APPARATUS IN QUESTION IS A LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTER USED FOR THE ANALYSIS OF RADIOACTIVELY LABELLED VIRAL AND CELLULAR NUCLEIC ACIDS IN BASIC RESEARCH ON TUMOUR VIRUS GENETICS , AND IN PARTICULAR ON DNA TUMOUR VIRUSES ; WHEREAS THE CHARACTERISTICS AND THE INTENDED USE RENDER IT MATERIAL SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR BASIC RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE ; WHEREAS , THEREFORE , IT HAS THE CHARACTER OF SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS ;

WHEREAS , HOWEVER , ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MEMBER STATES , APPARATUS OF SCIENTIFIC VALUE EQUIVALENT TO THE SAID APPARATUS CAPABLE OF USE FOR THE SAME PURPOSE IS CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

1 . THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' SEARLE MARK III LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTER ' MUST BE CONSIDERED TO BE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS .

2 . THE CONDITIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( B ) OF COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 FOR ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 1 ARE NOT FULFILLED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 24 JUNE 1977 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

ETIENNE DAVIGNON

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
NoL170/26 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 8.7.77
COMMISSION DECISION
of17May1977
authorizingtheItalianRepublicnottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttoessential
oiloforanges,notterpeneless ,fallingwithinsubheading33.01exAofthe
CommonCustomsTariff,originatingintheFederativeRepublicofBraziland
infreecirculationintheotherMemberStates
(OnlytheItaliantextisauthentic)
(77/429/EEC)
Whereasitisnotpossibleatthepresenttimetosetin
motionthemachineryforbringingabouttheneces­
sarycooperationfromtheotherMemberStates;
Whereas,inordertoensurethattheexecutionofthe
abovecommercialpolicymeasuresisnotobstructed,
authorizationshouldbegiven,foralimitedperiod,for
theapplicationofprotectivemeasuresunderthefirst
paragraphofArticle115,subjecttotheconditionslaid
downbytheCommission Decisionof12May
1971(*),andinparticularArticle1thereof,THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,andinparticularthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115thereof,
Havingregardtotheapplicationunderthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115oftheTreaty,madeon10March
1977bytheItalianGovernmenttotheCommission
bytelexfromtheOfficeofitsPermanentRepresenta­
tivetotheEuropeanCommunities ,forauthorization
nottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttoessentialoilof
oranges,notterpeneless,fallingwithinsubheading
33.01exAoftheCommonCustomsTariff,origi­
natingintheFederativeRepublicofBrazilandinfree
circulationintheotherMemberStates,
Whereas,accordingtothisapplication,Italyhas
placedquantitativerestrictionsonimportsofthe
productsinquestionoriginatingintheFederative
RepublicofBrazil;whereastherearenorestrictions
onimportsofsuchproductsintotheotherMember
States;
Whereasdifferencesinthecommercialpolicy
measuresappliedinconnectionwiththeseproducts
byItalyandbytheotherMemberStatesasregardsthe
FederativeRepublicofBrazilaregivingrisetodeflec­
tionoftrade;
Whereasthisdeflectionoftradeispreventingthe
executionoftheabovementioned measuresof
commercialpolicycurrentlybeingappliedbyItalyas
regardstheFederativeRepublicofBrazil,inparticular
toprotecttheindustryinquestion;
Whereas,accordingtoinformationsuppliedbythe
ItalianGovernment ,thisindustry,whichischaracte­
risticofcertaineconomicallyunderprivileged areasof
SouthernItaly,isfacingaseriouscrisiswhichisboth
structuralandeconomic ;HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1
TheItalianRepublicisauthorizednottoapply
Communitytreatmenttoimportsofessentialoilof
oranges,notterpeneless,fallingwithinsubheading
33.01exAoftheCommonCustomsTariff,where
theyoriginateintheFederativeRepublicofBraziland
areinfreecirculationintheotherMemberStates,and
inrespectofwhichapplicationsforimportlicences
lodgedafter28April1977are,atthedateofthisDeci­
sion,stillpendingwiththeItalianauthorities.
Article2
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheItalianRepublic.
DoneatBrussels,17May1977.
FortheCommission
ChristopherTUGENDHAT
MemberoftheCommission
0)OJNoL121,3.6.1971,p.26.
5.8.77 NoL198/28 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities
COMMISSION DECISION
of5May1977
authorizingtheFrenchRepublicnottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttoshirts
otherthanofsilk,noilorotherwastesilk,flaxorramiefallingwithinheading
Noex61.03oftheCommonCustomsTariff,originatinginHongKongandin
freecirculationintheotherMemberStates
(OnlytheFrenchtextisauthentic)
(77/480/EEC)
THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity,andinparticularthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115thereof,
Havingregardtotheapplicationunderthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115oftheTreaty,madeon2May
1977bytheFrenchGovernmenttotheCommission
bytelexfromtheofficeofitsPermanentRepresenta­
tivetotheEuropeanCommunities ,forauthorization
toapplyprotectivemeasuresinrespectoftheimporta­
tionofshirtsotherthanofsilk,noilorotherwaste
silk,flaxorramiefallingwithinheadingNoex61.03
oftheCommonCustomsTariff,originatinginHong
KongandinfreecirculationintheotherMember
States,
WhereastheimportationintotheCommunityofthe
productsinquestionoriginatinginHongKongisthe
subjectofanAgreementnegotiatedbetweenthe
CommunityandHongKongandconcludedon8
April1976;
Whereas,undertheAgreement,HongKonghas
undertakentotakeallnecessarystepstolimitits
exportsofcertaintextileproducts,includingthe
productsinquestion,totheCommunitytocertain
ceilingsallocatedamongtheMemberStates;
Whereastheallocationoftheseceilingsstillinvolves
certaindisparitiesinthequotasharesfixedforthe
variousMemberStatesbyreferencetothesupply
requirements ofthemarketsconcerned ;
Whereasthesedisparitiesarelikelytocauseaflowof
indirecttradewhichcouldaggravatethesituationof
theclothingindustry;
Whereas,accordingtoinformationsuppliedbythe
FrenchGovernment ,thereareseriouseconomicdiffi­
cultiesintheclothingsector,resultinginaprogres­
sivedeclineofproductionandareductionofthe
numberofworkersemployedinthatsector;
Whereasindirectimportsoftheproductsinquestion,
whichwouldbeinadditiontothosealreadyeffected,wouldbelikelytoaggravatetheseeconomicdiffi­
culties;
Whereasitisnotpossibleatthepresenttimetosetin
motionthemachineryforbringingabouttheneces­
sarycooperationfromtheotherMemberStates;
Whereasauthorizationshouldaccordinglybegiven,
foralimitedperiod,fortheapplicationofprotective
measures,underthefirstparagraphofArticle115,
subjecttotheconditionslaiddownbytheCommis­
sionDecisionof12May1971('),andinparticular
Article1thereof,
HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1
TheFrenchRepublicisauthorizednottoapply
Communitytreatmenttoimportsofshirtsotherthan
ofsilk,noilorotherwastesilk,flaxorramiefalling
withinheadingNoex61.03oftheCommonCustoms
Tariff,wheretheyoriginateinHongKongandarein
freecirculationintheotherMemberStates,andin
respectofwhichapplicationsforimportlicenceswere
lodgedafter19April1977.
Article2
ThisDecisionshallapplyuntilnewopportunities
ariseinFrancefortheimportationoftheproductsin
questionfromHongKongandinanycasenotlater
than31December1977.
Article3
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheFrenchRepublic.
DoneatBrussels,5May1977.
FortheCommission
AntonioGIOLITTI
MemberoftheCommission
(')OJNoL121,3.6.1971,p.26.
NoL179/30 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 19.7.77
COMMISSION DECISION
of28June1977
amendingtheDecisionof23July1975authorizingtheUnitedKingdomtotake
certainprotectivemeasuresinaccordancewithArticle108(3)oftheEECTreaty
(OnlytheEnglishtextisauthentic)
(77/457/EEC)
(a)directinvestmentsinMemberStatesbyUnited
Kingdomresidentsandtheliquidationofsuch
investments ;
(b)thefollowingcapitalmovementsofapersonal
nature:
—transfersofcapitalbelongingtoUnited
Kingdomresidentswhoareemigrating,
otherthantransfersinconnectionwiththe
freemovementofpersonsundertheprovi­
sionsofTitleIIIofPartTwooftheEEC
Treaty,
—giftsandendowments ,dowries,succession
duties,andrealestateinvestments ,other
thanthoseinconnectionwiththefreedom
ofmovementofpersonsundertheprovi­
sionsofTitleIIIofPartTwooftheEEC
Treaty.'THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,andinparticularArticle108
(3)thereof,
HavingregardtotheActofAccession,andinparti­
cularArticle124thereof,
WhereasbyDecision75/487/EECof23July1975(J)
theCommissionauthorizedtheUnitedKingdom,on
atemporarybasis,tomaintain,withinthelimitofthe
measuresactuallyinforceonthedatewhentheabove
Decisionwasnotified,restrictionsoncertaincapital
movements ;
WhereasbyDecisionof27July1976theCommis­
sionauthorizedtheUnitedKingdomtomaintainthe
measuresinquestionuntil30June1977;whereasthe
UnitedKingdom'sbalanceofpaymentsdifficulties
havenotyetbeeneliminated ;whereasthesediffi­
cultiesjustifythemaintenance ofthosemeasures,
subjecttocertainmodifications asregardsmovements
ofpersonalcapital;
WhereasDecision75/487/EECdidnotauthorizethe
maintenance ofrestrictionsoncapitalmovementsin
connection withthefreedomofmovement of
workers,whichwereliberalizedfromthedateofacces­
sion;whereasthemaintenance ofrestrictionsontrans­
fersofcapitalbelongingtootherpersonsentitledto
freedomofmovementhinderssuchfreedomofmove­
ment;whereas,therefore,theprohibitiononthemain­
tenanceofprotectivemeasuresshouldbeextendedto
covermovementsofapersonalnatureofcapital
belongingtosuchpersons,Article2
Article2oftheDecisionof23July1975isamended
toreadasfollows:
'1.TheCommission willkeepunderclose
reviewthedevelopmentoftheeconomicsituation
intheUnitedKingdom.Before31December
1977itwillmakeanexamination ofthesituation
andoftheeffectsofthemeasuresauthorized
herein.
2.TheCommissionreservestherighttoamend
orrevokethisDecisionifitfindsthatthecondi­
tionsonwhichitwasbasedhavechangedorthat
theeffectsoftheDecisionaremorerestrictive
thanisnecessarytoachieveitspurpose.'
Article3
HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheUnitedKingdom.
DoneatBrussels,28June1977. Article1oftheDecisionof23July1975isamended
toreadasfollows:
'TheUnitedKingdomisauthorized ,ona
temporarybasis,tomaintain,withinthelimitof
themeasuresactuallyinforceonthedatewhen
thisDecisionisnotified,therestrictionson:FortheCommission
ThePresident
RoyJENKINS
(')OJNoL211,9.8.1975,p.29.
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 184 , 15 . 7 . 1975 , P . 1 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 316 , 6 . 12 . 1975 , P . 17 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 20 JULY 1977

EXCLUDING FROM ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES THE GROUP OF SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' VHRR/VTPR SYSTEM '

( 77/507/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 ON THE IMPORTATION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF EDUCATIONAL , SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL MATERIALS ( 1 ),

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 OF 2 DECEMBER 1975 LAYING DOWN PROVISIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLES 4 AND 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS , BY LETTER DATED 7 APRIL 1977 , THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT REQUESTED THE COMMISSION TO INVOKE THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN ARTICLES 4 AND 5 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE GROUP OF APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' VHRR/VTPR SYSTEM ' SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS OR NOT AND , WHERE THE REPLY IS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE , WHETHER APPARATUS OF EQUIVALENT SCIENTIFIC VALUE ARE CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS , IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 4 ( 5 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 , A GROUP OF EXPERTS COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL THE MEMBER STATES MET ON 29 JUNE 1977 WITHIN THE COMMITTEE ON DUTY-FREE ARRANGEMENTS TO EXAMINE THIS PARTICULAR CASE ;

WHEREAS THIS EXAMINATION SHOWS THAT THE GROUP OF APPARATUS IN QUESTION IS A RECEPTION STATION FOR SIGNALS FROM METEORLOGICAL SATELLITES OF THE NEW HIGH RESOLUTION GENERATION ( VHRR ); WHEREAS IT IS USED FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM SATELLITES ; WHEREAS ITS TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND THE USE TO WHICH IT IS PUT RENDER IT MATERIAL SPECIALLY ADAPTED TO SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN THE METEORLOGICAL FIELD ; WHEREAS , THEREFORE , IT IS CONSIDERED TO BE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS ;

WHEREAS , ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MEMBER STATES , APPARATUS OF EQUIVALENT SCIENTIFIC VALUE CAPABLE OF USE FOR THE SAME PURPOSE IS CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

1 . THE GROUP OF APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' VHRR/VTPR SYSTEM ' MUST BE CONSIDERED TO BE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS .

2 . THE CONDITIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( B ) OF COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 FOR ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF THE GROUP OF APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' VHRR/VTPR SYSTEM ' ARE NOT FULFILLED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 20 JULY 1977 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

ETIENNE DAVIGNON

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
11.8.77 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities NoL205/23
COMMISSION DECISION
of19July1977
concerningtheissueofimportlicencesforbeefandvealproductsoriginatingin
Botswana,Kenya,MadagascarandSwaziland
(77/496/EEC)
HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1
ImportlicencesasprovidedforinRegulation(EEC)
No3376/75shallbeissuedforallthequantitiesfor
whichapplications forlicencesweresubmitted
between 1and10July1977inrespectofproducts
fromBotswana,Kenya,MadagascarandSwaziland.
Article2
Applicationsforlicencesmaybesubmitted,inaccor­
dancewithArticle2(3)ofRegulation (EEC)No
3376/75,duringthefirst10daysofAugust1977for
thefollowingquantitiesofbeefandvealexpressedin
termsofbonedmeat:THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilRegulation (EEC)No
3328/75of18December1975renewingthearrange­
mentsforthereductionofimportchargesonbeefand
vealproductsoriginatingintheAfrican,Caribbean
andPacificStates(1),aslastamendedbyRegulation
(EEC)No2841/76(2),andinparticularArticle3
thereof,
WhereasRegulation(EEC)No3328/75providesthat
importlicencesmaybeissuedforbeefandveal
products;whereas,however,thequantitiesimported
mustremainwithinthelimitslaiddownforeachof
theexportingnon-membercountriesinquestion;
Whereas,inthecaseofproductsoriginatinginBots­
wana,Kenya,MadagascarandSwaziland,thequanti­
tiescoveredbythelicenceapplicationssubmitted
from1to10July1977expressedintermsofboned
meat,inaccordancewithArticle1ofCommission
Regulation(EEC)No3376/75of23December1975
layingdownrulesfortheapplicationofCouncilRegu­
lation(EEC)No3328/75(3),aslastamendedbyRegu­
lation(EEC)No3136/76(4),arelowerthanthequanti­
tiesavailableforthesaidStates;whereasitistherefore
possibletoissueimportlicencesforallthequantities
appliedforandatthesametimetospecifythequanti­
tiesoutstanding ,inrespectofwhichapplicationsmay
besubmittedfrom1August1977,Botswana
Kenya
Madagascar
Swaziland2059-2tonnes,
130-0tonnes,
5949-5tonnes,
1275-2tonnes.
Article3
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheMemberStates.
DoneatBrussels,19July1977.
FortheCommission
FinnGUNDELACH
Vice-President
(»)OJNoL329,23.12.1975,p.4.
(2)OJNoL327,26.11.1976,p.1.
(3)OJNoL333,30.12.1975,p.44.
(4)OJNoL353,23.12.1976,p.40.
NoL218/36 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 26.8.77
COMMISSION DECISION
of11August1977
concerningthereplacementoftwomembersoftheAdvisoryCommitteeon
CustomsMatters
(77/558/EEC)
THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropeanEconomicCommunity,
HavingregardtotheCommissionDecisionof7November1973settingupanAdvisory
CommitteeonCustomsMatters(1),andinparticularArticle5thereof,
WhereasitisnecessarytoimplementtheprovisionsofArticle5,thirdandfourthsubpara­
graphs,ofthesaidDecisioninordertoreplacetworesigningmembersoftheAdvisory
CommitteeonCustomsMatters,
HASDECIDED ASFOLLOWS :
Article1
ThefollowingshallbenominatedmembersoftheAdvisoryCommitteeonCustoms
Matters:
—MrWroblewski (Germany)representative ofconsumers
and
—MrEenhorst(Netherlands)representative oftheChambersofCommerceandIndustry
replacingrespectivelyMrVolkersandMrMedernach,whoareresigning.
Article2
ThisDecisionshallenterintoforceon1September1977.
DoneatBrussels,11August1977.
FortheCommission
ÉtienneDAVIGNON
MemberoftheCommission
(1)OJNoL321,22.11.1973,p.37.
NoL272/8 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 25.10.77
COMMISSION DECISION
of13October1977
authorizingtheKingdomoftheNetherlands topermittemporarilythe
marketingofseednotcomplyingwithrequirements ofCouncilDirective
66/402/EEC
(77/662/EEC)
THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilDirective66/402/EECof14
June1966onthemarketingofcerealseed(1),aslast
amendedbyCouncilDirective75/444/EEC(2),andin
particularArticle17thereof,
HavingregardtotherequestmadebytheKingdom
oftheNetherlands ,
WhereasintheKingdomoftheNetherlandsthe
productionofrye(winterrye)seedcomplyingwith
requirementsofthesaidDirectivehasbeeninsuffi­
cientin1977andisnotadequatetosupplytheneeds
ofthatcountry;
Whereasithasnotbeenpossibletocovertheseneeds
immediatelyby'certifiedseed'fromotherMember
Statesorevenfromthirdcountries,meetingallthe
requirementslaiddowninthesaidDirective;
WhereastheKingdomoftheNetherlandsshould
thereforebeauthorizedtopermit,foraperiod
expiringon15November1977,themarketingofseed
oftheabovementioned speciesofacategorysubjectto
lessstringestrequirements ;
Whereasitappearsalsodesirabletoauthorizeother
MemberStateswhichareabletosupplytheKingdom
oftheNetherlandswiththisseednotcomplyingwith
requirementsoftheDirectivetopermitthemarketing
ofsuchseedprovidedthatitisintendedexclusively
fortheNetherlands ;
WhereastheStandingCommitteeonSeedandPropa­
gatingMaterialforAgriculture,Horticultureand
Forestryhasnotdeliveredanopinionwithinthetime
limitsetbyitschairman,
HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1­
TheKingdomoftheNetherlands isauthorizedto
permitforaperiodexpiringon15November1977themarketingonitsterritoryofryeseed(Secale
cerealeL.)—winterrye—uptoamaximumof
2000tonnesofthecategory'certifiedseed'ofthefirst
generationsubjecttolessstringentrequirementswith
regardtominimumgerminationcapacitylaiddown
inAnnexIItoCouncilDirective66/402/EEC
providedthatthefollowingrequirementsaresatisfied:
(a)thegerminationcapacityisatleast80%ofpure
seed;
(b)theofficiallabelshallbearthesupplementary indi­
cation:
'Minimumgermination :80%',
'IntendedexclusivelyfortheNetherlands'.
Article2
TheotherMemberStatesareauthorizedtopermit,
subjecttotheconditionslaiddowninArticle1,the
marketingintheirterritoriesofamaximumof2000
tonnesofryeseed—winterrye—providedthatsuch
seedisintendedexclusivelyfortheNetherlands .The
officiallabelshallstate:
'IntendedexclusivelyfortheNetherlands'.
Article3
TheMemberStatesshallnotifytheCommission
before31March1978ofthequantitiesofseed
marketedintheirterritoriespursuanttothisDecision.
TheCommission shallinformtheotherMember
Statesthereof.
Article4
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheMemberStates.
DoneatBrussels,13October1977.
FortheCommission
FinnGUNDELACH
Vice-President
(»)OJNo125,11.7.1976,p.2309/66.$OJNoL196,26.7.1975,p.6.