ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
COMMISSION DECISION of 25 January 1977 laying down a sampling plan for the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg with regard to the 1975 survey on the structure of agricultural holdings (Only the French text is authentic) (77/125/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 75/108/EEC of 20 January 1975 on the organization of a structures survey for 1975 as part of the programme of surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings (1), and in particular Article 8 (1) (c) thereof.

Whereas pursuant to Article 8 (1) (c) of Directive 75/108/EEC the sampling plans are to be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11 of that Directive;

Whereas pursuant to Article 6 (1) of Directive 75/108/EEC random samples of agricultural holdings are to be taken and the number of these samples is to be between the limits laid down in that Article;

Whereas pursuant to Article 8 (1) (c) of Directive 75/108/EEC the sampling plans are to refer to strata and regions;

Whereas the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has presented a sampling plan which fulfils all the conditions set out above;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Statistics,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION

Article 1

The sample of agricultural holdings shall be based on individual documents deriving from the annual census of agriculture of 15 May 1974.

Article 2

The population of the holdings shall be divided: (a) by canton;

(b) according to the agricultural area utilized on the holding into five strata : less than five hectares, five to less than 15 hectares, 15 to less than 30 hectares, 30 to less than 50 hectares, 50 hectares and above.

Article 3

1. Before samples are taken, the populations of the holdings in each canton shall be arranged in ascending order of magnitude in each stratum of agricultural area utilized.

2. The sampling of holdings shall be systematic.

3. The sample shall include all holdings with 50 hectares and above, half the holdings with 30 to less than 50 hectares, one fifth of the holdings with 15 to less than 30 hectares, one eighth of the holdings with five to less than 15 hectares and one tenth of the holdings with less than five hectares.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

Done at Brussels, 25 January 1977.

For the Commission

François-Xavier ORTOLI

Vice-President (1)OJ No L 42, 15.2.1975, p. 21.
15.3.77 NoL68/32 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities
COMMISSION DECISION
of3March1977
authorizingtheItalianRepublictopermittemporarilythemarketingofseed
notcomplyingwiththerequirements ofCouncilDirective66/402/EEC
(OnlytheItaliantextisauthentic)
(77/221/EEC)
(b)theofficiallabelshallbemarkedasfollows:
—'Minimumgermination75%',
—'IntendedexclusivelyforItaly'.
2.TheItalianRepublicisherebyauthorizedto
permit,foraperiodexpiringon30June1977,the
marketinginitsterritoryofamaximumof4000
tonnesofriceseed(OryzasativaL)ofthecategory
'certifiedseedofthesecondgeneration'whichdonot
satisfytherequirements laiddowninAnnexIIto
Directive66/402/EECwithregardtothemaximum
numberof'redgrains',underthefollowingcondi­
tions:
(a)thenumberof'redgrains'per500gramsshallnot
exceed10;
(b)theofficiallabelshallbemarkedasfollows:
—'Maximumnumberofredgrains:10per500
grams',
—'IntendedexclusivelyforItaly'.
3.TheItalianRepublicisherebyauthorizedto
permit,withinthemaximumquantitiesunderpara­
graphs1and2,themarketinginitsterritoryofrice
seed{OryzasativaL)ofthecategory'certifiedseedof
thesecondgeneration'whichsatisfyneithertherequir­
ementsregardingminimumgerminationnorthose
regardingthemaximumcontentof'redgrains',
providedthatthewholeoftherequirements referred
toinparagraphs 1and2aremet.
Article2
TheItalianRepublicshallnotifytheCommission
before1November1977ofthequantitiesofseed
marketedinitsterritorypursuanttothisDecision.
TheCommission shallinformtheotherMember
Statesthereof.
Article3
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheItalianRepublic.
DoneatBrussels,3March1977.
FortheCommission
FinnGUNDELACH
Vice-PresidentTHECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilDirective66/402/EECof14
June1966onthemarketingofcerealseed('),aslast
amendedbyDirective75/444/EEC(2),andinparti­
cularArticle17thereof,
HavingregardtotherequestmadebytheItalian
Republic,
WhereasintheItalianRepublictheproductionof
riceseedcomplyingwiththerequirements ofthesaid
Directivehasbeeninsufficient in1976andtherefore
willnotbeadequatetomeetthatcountry'sneeds;
Whereasitisnotpossiblesufficientlytocoverthis
demandwithcertifiedseedfromotherMemberStates
orfromthirdcountries,meetingalltherequirements
laiddowninthesaidDirective;
WhereastheItalianRepublicshouldthereforebeauth­
orizedtopermit,foraperiodexpiringon30June
1977,themarketingofseedoftheabovementioned
speciesofacategorysubjecttolessstringentrequire­
ments;
WhereasthemeasuresprovidedforinthisDecision
areinaccordancewiththeopinionoftheStanding
CommitteeonSeedandPropagatingMaterialforAgri­
culture,HorticultureandForestry,
HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1
1.TheItalianRepublicisherebyauthorizedto
permit,foraperiodexpiringon30June1977,the
marketinginitsterritoryofamaximumof6000
tonnesofriceseed(0>yzasativaL.)ofthecategories
'certifiedseedofthefirstgeneration'or'certifiedseed
ofthesecondgeneration'whichdoesnotsatisfythe
requirements laiddowninAnnexIItoDirective
66/402/EECwithregardtominimumgermination ,
underthefollowingconditions :
(a)theminimumgerminationmustbeatleast75%
ofpureseed;
(')OJNo125,11.7.1966,p.230£/66.
(2)OJNoL196,26.7.1975,p.6.
NoL138/32 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 4.6.77
COMMISSION DECISION
of10May1977
onthereimbursement bytheGuidanceSectionoftheEAGGFtoIrelandof
expenditureincurredduring1975onaidsandpremiumsrelatingtothemoderni­
zationoffarms
(OnlytheEnglishtextisauthentic)
(77/364/EEC)
forereimburse25%thereof,i.e.£373720-46
(896928-39u.a.);
Whereasapaymentonaccountof£280290-35
(672696-30u.a.)hasbeengrantedinapplicationof
Article21(3)ofDirective72/159/EECandofArticle
4(1)ofDecision74/581/EEC;whereasabalanceof£
93430-11(22423209u.a.)shouldthereforebe
grantedtotheMemberStateinquestion;
WhereastheFundCommitteehasbeenconsultedon
thefinancialaspectsandinparticularastothefunds
available,THECOMMISSION OFTHE'EUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES , j
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilDirective72/159/EECof17
April1972onthemodernization offarms('),aslast
amendedbyDirective76/837/EEC(2),andinparti­
cularArticle21(2)thereof,
WhereasthemeasurestakenbyIrelandtoimplement
Directive72/159/EECwerethesubjectofafavourable
CommissionDecisionpursuanttoArticle18ofthe
saidDirective ;
WhereasIrelandhasmadeanapplicationforreimbur­
sementofexpenditureincurredduring1975onaids
andpremiumsrelatingtothemodernization offarms;
whereasthisapplicationiscompleteandhasbeen
submittedindueformandinaccordancewiththe
requirements ofCommissionDecision74/581/EECof
16October1974concerningapplicationsforreimbur­
sementinrespectofaidgrantedbytheMemberStates
pursuanttoDirectives72/159/EEC,72/160/EECand
72/161/EEC(3),andalsowiththepaymentson
accountwhichcanbeagreed;
Whereasanexaminationoftheinformationprovided
showsthateligibleexpenditureof£1494881-84
(3587713-55u.a.),brokendownasfollows,hasbeen
incurredundertheconditionslaiddowninDirective
72/159/EEC:HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1
ThefinalcontributionbytheGuidanceSectionofthe
EuropeanAgriculturalGuidanceandGuaranteeFund
towardstheexpenditureincurredbyIrelandduring
1975inrespectofaidandpremiumsrelatingtothe
modernization offarmsshallbe£373720-46
(896928-39u.a.).
Article2
ThisDecisionisaddressedtoIreland.
—underArticle8:£1481541-84
—underArticle10:—
—underArticle 11:£13340-00
—underArticle 12:—
—underArticle13:—DoneatBrussels,10May1977.
FortheCommission
FinnGUNDELACH
Vice-PresidentWhereastheGuidanceSectionoftheEuropeanAgri­
culturalGuidanceandGuaranteeFundshouldthere­
(')OJNoL96,23.4.1972,p.1.
(-)OJNoL302,4.11.1976,p.19.
(J)OJNoL320,29.11.1974,p.1.
NoL120/20 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 13.5.77
COUNCIL DECISION
of25April1977
appointinganalternatememberoftheAdvisoryCommitteeonMedical
Training
(77/342/EEC)
THECOUNCILOFTHEEUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropeanEconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilDecision75/364/EECof16June1975settingupanAdvisory
CommitteeonMedicalTraining(>),
HavingregardtoCouncilDecision76/385/EECof6April1976appointingthemembers
andalternatemembersoftheAdvisoryCommitteeonMedicalTraining(2),
WhereasMrHasterthasresignedasanalternatememberoftheAdvisoryCommitteeon
MedicalTraining;
WhereastheLuxembourgGovernmentnominatedMrKaselasanewalternatemember
ofthatCommitteebyletterdated23March1977,
HASDECIDED ASFOLLOWS :
SoleArticle
MrKaselisherebyappointedanalternatememberoftheAdvisoryCommitteeon
MedicalTraininginplaceofMrHastertfortheremainderofthelatter'stermofoffice,
whichrunsuntil5April1979.
DoneatLuxembourg ,25April1977.
FortheCouncil
ThePresident
J.SILKIN
(>)O)NoL167,}().6.I'm,p.17,
(')OJNo1.101,IS.4.1976,p.SI.
NoL147/38 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 15.6.77
COMMISSION DECISION
of10May1977
authorizingtheFrenchRepublictopermittemporarilythemarketingofseed
notcomplyingwithrequirements ofCouncilDirective69/208/EEC
(77/393/EEC)
THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilDirective69/208/EECof30
June1969onthemarketingofseedofoilandfibre
plants(*),aslastamendedbyCouncilDirective
75/444/EECof26June1975(2),andinparticular
Article16thereof,
HavingregardtotherequestmadebytheFrench
Republic,
WhereasinFrancetheproductionofhempseed
complyingwithrequirementsofthesaidDirectivehas
beeninsufficientin1976andisnotadequateto
supplytheneedsofthatcountry;
Whereasithasnotbeenpossibletocovertheseneeds
sufficientlybycertifiedseedfromotherMember
Statesorevenfromthirdcountries,meetingallthe
requirements laiddowninthesaidDirective;
WhereastheFrenchRepublicshouldthereforebe
authorizedtopermit,foraperiodexpiringon30June
1977,themarketingofseedoftheabovementioned
speciesofthecategory'certifiedseedofthefirstgener­
ation'subjecttolessstringentrequirementsandalso
ofthecategory'commercialseed';
Whereasitappearsalsodesirabletoauthorizeother
MemberStateswhichareabletosupplytheFrench
Republicwiththisseednotcomplyingwithrequire­
mentsoftheDirectivetopermitthemarketingof
suchseedprovidedthatitisintendedexclusivelyfor
France;
WhereasthemeasuresprovidedforinthisDecision
areinaccordancewiththeopinionoftheStanding
CommitteeonSeedsandPropagatingMaterialfor
Agriculture ,HorticultureandForestry,
HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1
1.TheFrenchRepublicisauthorizedtopermitfor
aperiodexpiringon30June1977themarketingin
itsterritoryofamaximumof30tonnesofhempseed
(CannabissativaL.)ofthecategories'certifiedseedofthefirstgenerationwhichdonotsatisfyfeerequire­
mentslaiddowninAnnexIItoDirective
69/208/EEC,withregardtotheminimumgermina­
tion,providedthatthefollowingrequirements are
satisfied :
(a)thegerminationcapacityisatleast70%ofpure
seed;
(b)theofficiallabelshallbearthefollowingendorse­
ments:
—'minimumgerminationcapacity70%',
—'intendedexclusivelyforFrance'.
2.TheFrenchRepublicisauthorizedtopermitfor
aperiodexpiringon30June1977themarketingin
itsterritoryofamaximumof250tonnesofhemp
seed(CannabissativaL.)ofthecategory'commercial
seed'.Theofficiallabelshallstate:'intendedexclu­
sivelyforFrance'.
Article2
TheotherMemberStatesareauthorizedtopermit,
subjecttotheconditionslaiddowninArticle1,the
marketingintheirterritoriesofamaximumof30
tonnesofseedreferredtoinArticle1(1)andofa
maximumof250tonnesofseedreferredtoinArticle
1(2)providedthatsuchseedisintendedexclusively
forFrance.Theofficiallabelshallstate:'intended
exclusivelyforFrance'.
Article3
TheMemberStatesshallnotifytheCommission
before1November1977ofthequantitiesofseed
marketedintheirterritoriespursuanttothisDecision.
TheCommission shallinformtheotherMember
Statesthereof.
Article4
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheMemberStates.
DoneatBrussels,10May1977.
FurtheCommission
FinnGUNDELACH
Vice-President
(')OJNoL169.10.7.1969,p.,V
{■)OJNoL196.26.7.1975,p.6.
++++

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 23 MAY 1977

ALLOWING ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES THE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS " LOCK-IN-AMPLIFIER " PAR MODEL 128 A , WITH TUNED AMPLIFIER PAR MODEL 128 A/98 OPTIONAL

( 77/379/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 ON THE IMPORTATION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF EDUCATIONAL , SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL MATERIALS ( 1 ) ,

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 OF 2 DECEMBER 1975 LAYING DOWN PROVISIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 ( 2 ) , AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 4 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS , BY LETTER DATED 23 NOVEMBER 1976 , THE GERMAN GOVERNMENT REQUESTED THE COMMISSION TO INVOKE THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN PARAGRAPHS 3 TO 7 OF ARTICLE 4 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER APPARATUS OF SCIENTIFIC VALUE EQUIVALENT TO THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS " LOCK-IN-AMPLIFIER " PAR MODEL 128 A , WITH TUNED AMPLIFIER PAR MODEL 128 A/98 OPTIONAL , IS CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS , IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 4 ( 5 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 , A GROUP OF EXPERTS COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL OF THE MEMBER STATES MET ON 29 APRIL 1977 WITHIN THE COMMITTEE ON DUTY-FREE ARRANGEMENTS TO EXAMINE THIS PARTICULAR CASE ;

WHEREAS THE APPARATUS IN QUESTION IS A PHASE-SENSITIVE DETECTION SYSTEM WITH TUNED AMPLIFIER OPTION , THE PURPOSE OF WHICH IS TO MEASURE THE " COTTON-MOUTON " EFFECT ON LIQUIDS AND GASES , PERMITTING AMPLIFICATION , IN THE ABSENCE OF SOUND , OF SIGNALS EMITTED BY A PHOTODIODE ;

WHEREAS , ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE MEMBER STATES , APPARATUS OF EQUIVALENT SCIENTIFIC VALUE CAPABLE OF USE FOR THE SAME PURPOSE COULD ONLY HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY FROM 1 AUGUST 1976 ; WHEREAS , TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE DATE WHEN THE APPARATUS IN QUESTION WAS ORDERED , THE DELIVERY PERIOD FIXED BY THE COMMUNITY PRODUCERS BEING TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION IS CONSIDERABLY GREATER THAN THAT FOR APPARATUS WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION FOR DUTY-FREE ADMISSION ; WHEREAS IT APPEARS APPROPRIATE IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES TO ALLOW THE DUTY-FREE IMPORTATION OF THE APPARATUS IN QUESTION ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

THE CONDITIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( B ) OF COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 FOR ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF THE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS " LOCK-IN-AMPLIFIER " PAR MODEL 128 A , WITH TUNED AMPLIFIER PAR MODEL 128 A/98 OPTIONAL , ARE FULFILLED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 23 MAY 1977 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

ETIENNE DAVIGNON

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION

( 1 ) OJ NO L 184 , 15 . 7 . 1975 , P . 1 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 316 , 6 . 12 . 1975 , P . 17 .
NoL169/32 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 7.7.77
COMMISSION
COMMISSION DECISION
of13June1977
extendingtheperiodofvalidityoftheCommission Decisionof13March1975
layingdowndetailedrulesforretrospectivecontrolofimportsofshoesintothe
Community
(77/424/EEC)
THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilRegulation (EEC)No
1439/74of4June1974establishingcommonrules
forimports(]),andinparticularArticle7thereof,
HavingregardtoCouncilRegulation (EEC)No
109/70of19December1969establishingcommon
rulesforimportsfromState-tradingcountries(2),and
inparticularArticle6(1)(a)thereof,
Consultations havingbeenheldwithintheCommit­
teessetupunderArticle5ofeachofthesaidRegula­
tions;
WhereasbytheCommissionDecisionof13March
1975(3),theCommissionestablisheddetailedrulesfor
retrospectivecontrolofimportsofshoesintothe
Community ;whereassuchretrospectivecontrolis
duetoexpireon30June1977;
WhereasthereasonwhichoriginallyledtheCommis­
siontotakesuchaction,thatistosaytheconsiderable
increaseofimportsofshoesintotheCommunity
whichisaffectingaparticularlysensitivesectorof
Communityindustry,continuestoapply;whereasit
isthereforenecessarytoprolongretrospectivecontrol
ofimportsofshoesintotheCommunity ,HASADOPTED THISDECISION :
Article1
TheperiodofvalidityoftheCommissionDecisionof
13March1975establishing aretrospectivecontrolof
importsofshoesisherebyextendedto31December
1978.
Article2
ThisDecisionshallapplyfrom1July1977to31
December1978.
Article3
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheMemberStates.
DoneatBrussels,13June1977.
FortheCommission
£tienneDAVIGNON
MemberoftheCommission
(')OJNoL159,15.6.1974,p.1.
(2)OJNoL19,26.1.1970,p.1.
(3)OJNoL90,11.4.1975,p.40.
****

( 1 ) OJ NO L 184 , 15 . 7 . 1975 , P . 1 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 316 , 6 . 12 . 1975 , P . 17 .

COMMISSION DECISION

OF 24 JUNE 1977

EXCLUDING FROM ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES THE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' PACKARD AUTO-GAMMA-SYSTEM ' , MODEL 5230

( 77/446/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ,

HAVING REGARD TO COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 ON THE IMPORTATION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF EDUCATIONAL , SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL MATERIALS ( 1 ),

HAVING REGARD TO COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 OF 2 DECEMBER 1975 LAYING DOWN PROVISIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 ( 2 ), AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLES 4 AND 5 THEREOF ,

WHEREAS , BY LETTER DATED 8 FEBRUARY 1977 , THE GERMAN GOVERNMENT REQUESTED THE COMMISSION TO INVOKE THE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN ARTICLES 4 AND 5 OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS : ' PACKARD AUTO-GAMMA-SYSTEM ' , MODEL 5230 , SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS , AND WHERE THE REPLY IS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE , WHETHER APPARATUS OF EQUIVALENT SCIENTIFIC VALUE IS CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS , IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 4 ( 5 ) OF REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 3195/75 , A GROUP OF EXPERTS COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL OF THE MEMBER STATES MET ON 3 JUNE 1977 WITHIN THE COMMITTEE ON DUTY-FREE ARRANGEMENTS TO EXAMINE THIS PARTICULAR CASE ;

WHEREAS THIS EXAMINATION SHOWS THAT THE APPARATUS IN QUESTION IS AN AUTOMATIC GAMMA MODULAR SYSTEM COUNTER FOR MEASURING RADIONUCLIDES IN BIOLOGICAL MATTER IN ORDER TO CARRY OUT STUDIES ON HUMAN , ANIMAL , VEGETABLE OR SOIL METABOLISM ; WHEREAS THE PARTICULAR CHARACTERISTICS AND THE INTENDED USE RENDER IT MATERIAL SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR LABORATORY RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF BIOMEDICINE ; WHEREAS , THEREFORE , IT HAS THE CHARACTER OF SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS ;

WHEREAS , HOWEVER , ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MEMBER STATES , APPARATUS OF SCIENTIFIC VALUE EQUIVALENT TO THE SAID APPARATUS CAPABLE OF USE FOR THE SAME PURPOSE IS CURRENTLY MANUFACTURED IN THE COMMUNITY ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

1 . THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED AS ' PACKARD AUTO-GAMMA-SYSTEM ' , MODEL 5230 , MUST BE CONSIDERED TO BE SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS .

2 . THE CONDITIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3 ( 1 ) ( B ) OF COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1798/75 OF 10 JULY 1975 FOR ADMISSION FREE OF COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF DUTIES OF THE APPARATUS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 1 ARE NOT FULFILLED .

ARTICLE 2

THIS DECISION IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 24 JUNE 1977 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

ETIENNE DAVIGNON

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
COMMISSION DECISION of 20 July 1977 on the refusal to accept the scientific character of printing apparatus intended for high-speed printing described as "Tektronix Graphical Display System" model 4051 (77/506/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 of 10 July 1975 on the importation free of Common Customs Tariff duties of educational, scientific and cultural materials (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3195/75 of 2 December 1975 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 1798/75 (2), and in particular Articles 4 and 5 thereof,

Whereas, by letter dated 24 March 1977, the Belgian Government requested the Commission to detemine whether the apparatus described as "Tektronix Graphical Display System" model 4051 should be considered to be scientific apparatus;

Whereas, in accordance with Article 4 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 3195/75, a group of experts composed of representatives of all the Member States met on 29 June 1977 within the Committee on Duty Free Arrangements to examine this particular case;

Whereas this examination shows that the apparatus in question is a compact graphical display system with integrated treatment capacity, used in data processing for the graphical interpretation of data ; whereas such apparatus does not in itself consist of special equipment intended to be used specifically for scientific purposes ; whereas it is a multi-purpose apparatus just as capable of use in research as in commercial or industrial production ; whereas its use for scientific research could not of itself give it a scientific character ; whereas, therefore, it cannot be considered to be scientific apparatus,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The apparatus described as "Tektronix Graphical Display System" model 4051 cannot be considered to be scientific apparatus.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 July 1977.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 184, 15.7.1975, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 316, 6.12.1975, p. 17.
NoL198/30 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 5.8.77
COMMISSION DECISION
of27May1977
authorizingtheFrenchRepublicnottoapplyCommunitytreatmenttoblouses
fallingwithinheadingNoex61.02oftheCommonCustomsTariff,originating
intheRepublicofKoreaandinfreecirculationintheotherMemberStates
(OnlytheFrenchtextisauthentic)
(77/482/EEC)
subjecttotheconditionslaiddownbytheCommis­
sionDecisionof12May1971('),andinparticular
Article1thereof,THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,andinparticularthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115thereof,
Havingregardtotheapplicationunderthefirstpara­
graphofArticle115oftheTreatymadeon20May
1977bytheFrenchGovernmenttotheCommission
bytelexfromtheofficeofitsPermanentRepresenta­
tivetotheEuropeanCommunities ,forauthorization
toapplyprotectivemeasurestoimportsofblouses
fallingwithinheadingNoex61.02oftheCommon
CustomsTariff,originatingintheRepublicofKorea
andinfreecirculationintheotherMemberStates,
WhereastheimportationintotheCommunityofthe
productsinquestionoriginatingintheRepublicof
KoreaisthesubjectofanAgreementnegotiated
betweentheCommunityandtheRepublicofKorea
andsignedon22December1976;
WhereasundertheAgreementtheRepublicofKorea
hasundertakentotakeallnecessarystepstolimitits
exportsofcertaintextileproductstotheCommunity
tocertainrequirementsofthemarketsconcerned ;
Whereastheindirectimportsinquestion,which
wouldbeinadditiontothosealreadyeffected,would
belikelytoaggravatetheseeconomicdifficulties;
Whereasitisnotpossibleatthepresenttimetosetin
motionthemachineryforbringingabouttheneces­
sarycooperationfromtheotherMemberStates;
Whereasauthorizationshouldaccordinglybegiven,
foralimitedperiod,fortheapplicationofprotective
measures,underthefirstparagraphofArticle115,HASADOPTEDTHISDECISION :
Article1
TheFrenchRepublicisauthorizednottoapply
Communitytreatmenttoimportsofblousesandshirt­
blousesforwomen,girlsandinfantswithinheading
Noex61.02oftheCommonCustomsTariff,where
theyoriginateintheRepublicofKoreaandarein
freecirculationintheotherMemberStates,andin
respectofwhichapplicationsforimportlicenceswere
lodgedafter8May1977.
Article2
ThisDecisionshallapplyuntilnewopportunities
ariseintheFrenchRepublicfortheimportationof
theproductsinquestionfromtheRepublicofKorea
andinanycasenotlaterthan31December1977.
Article3
ThisDecisionisaddressedtotheFrenchRepublic.
DoneatBrussels,27May1977.
FortheCommission
fitienneDAVIGNON
MemberoftheCommission
(')OJNoL121,3.6.1971,p.26.