ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union L 162/19

AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the fifth paragraph of Article 257 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Having regard to Article 7(1) of Annex I to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union,

Having regard to the agreement of the Court of Justice,

Whereas certain provisions of the Rules of Procedure should be amended to allow the lodging and service of procedural documents by electronic means, without the need for those procedural steps to be confirmed by post or by the physical delivery of such documents,

With the Council’s approval given on 13 May 2011,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:

Article 1

The Rules of Procedure of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 25 July 2007 (OJ L 225 of 29 August 2007, p. 1, with corrigendum OJ L 69 of 13 March 2008, p. 37) (1) are hereby amended as follows:

1. In the first sentence of Article 99(2), the words ‘or where the document to be served is a judgment or an order’ shall be deleted.

2. A third paragraph shall be added to Article 99, worded as follows: ‘The Tribunal may by decision determine the criteria for a procedural document to be served by electronic means. That decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.’

Article 2

These amendments to the Rules of Procedure, which are authentic in the languages referred to in Article 35(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union, applicable to the Civil Service Tribunal by virtue of Article 7(2) of Annex I to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the first day of the month following that of their publication.

Luxembourg, 18 May 2011.

(1) Amended on 14 January 2009 (OJ L 24 of 28 January 2009, p. 10) and 17 March 2010 (OJ L 92 of 13 April 2010, p. 17).
31.

Before presenting a proposal for the creation of a new agency, the Commission should produce a sound, complete and objective impact assessment, taking into account, inter alia, the critical mass of staff and competencies, cost-benefit aspects, subsidiarity and proportionality, the impact on national and Union activities, and the budgetary implications for the expenditure heading concerned. On the basis of that information and without prejudice to the legislative procedures governing the setting up of the agency, the European Parliament and the Council commit themselves, in the framework of budgetary cooperation, to arrive at a timely agreement on the financing of the proposed agency. The following procedural steps shall be applied: — firstly, the Commission shall systematically present any proposal for setting up a new agency to the first trilogue following the adoption of its proposal, and shall present the financial statement accompanying the draft legal act proposing the creation of the agency and shall illustrate the consequences thereof for the remaining period of the financial programming, — secondly, during the legislative process, the Commission shall assist the legislator in assessing the financial consequences of the amendments proposed. Those financial consequences should be considered during the relevant legislative trilogues, — thirdly, before the conclusion of the legislative process, the Commission shall present an updated financial statement taking into account potential modifications by the legislator; this final financial statement shall be placed on the agenda of the final legislative trilogue and formally endorsed by the legislator. It shall also be placed on the agenda of a subsequent budgetary trilogue (in urgent cases, in simplified form), in view of reaching an agreement on the financing, — fourthly, the agreement reached during a trilogue, taking into account the Commission's budgetary assessment with regard to the content of the legislative process, shall be confirmed in a joint declaration. That agreement shall be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council, each in accordance with its own rules of procedure. The same procedure would be applied to any amendment to a legal act concerning an agency which would have an impact on the resources of the agency in question. Should the tasks of an agency be modified substantially without an amendment to the legal act setting up the agency in question, the Commission shall inform the European Parliament and the Council by means of a revised financial statement, so as to allow the European Parliament and the Council to arrive at a timely agreement on the financing of the agency.
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 215/6

Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Correlation table

(2015/C 215/05)

The following table indicates, in relation to each Article, paragraph or subparagraph of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of 2 May 1991, as last amended on 19 June 2013, the corresponding Article and, where appropriate, paragraph of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of 4 March 2015, which entered into force on 1 July 2015 (OJ L 105, 23.4.2015, p. 1).

Where appropriate, reference is also made in brackets to the Articles of the 1991 Rules of Procedure of the General Court which have been substantively amended in the new rules of procedure, excluding amendments of a purely formal or terminological nature.
‘4.

Each Member of the Commission shall take political responsibility for action in the field of which he/she is in charge, without prejudice to the principle of Commission collegiality. The President of the Commission shall be fully responsible for identifying any conflict of interest which renders a Member of the Commission unable to perform his/her duties. The President of the Commission shall likewise be responsible for any subsequent action taken in such circumstances and shall inform the President of Parliament thereof immediately and in writing. The participation of Members of the Commission in electoral campaigns is governed by the Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission. Members of the Commission may participate in electoral campaigns in elections to the Parliament, including as candidates. They may also be chosen by European political parties as lead candidate (‘Spitzenkandidat’) for the position of President of the Commission. The President of the Commission shall inform Parliament in due time whether one or more Members of the Commission will stand as candidates in electoral campaigns for elections to the Parliament, as well as of the measures taken to ensure the respect of the principles of independence, integrity and discretion provided for by Article 245 TFEU and the Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission. Any Member of the Commission standing as candidate or participating in an electoral campaign for elections to the Parliament will undertake to refrain from adopting a position, in the course of the campaign, that would not be in line with his/her duty of confidentiality, or that would infringe the principle of collegiality. Members of the Commission standing as candidates or participating in electoral campaigns for elections to the Parliament may not use the Commission's human or material resources for activities linked to the electoral campaign.’.
DECISION No 19-2020 OF THE COURT OF AUDITORS

of 14 December 2020

regarding the amendment of Article 19 of its Rules of Procedure

THE COURT OF AUDITORS,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the fifth subparagraph of Article 287(4) thereof,

Having regard to the approval of the Council given on 23 November 2020,

Whereas:

(1) The Rules of Procedure of the Court of Auditors (Court) do not provide for the possibility for the Court to adopt its decisions remotely, namely, by means of video or telephone conference, in exceptional circumstances which constitute force majeure.

(2) In order to enable the Court to adopt its decisions remotely in exceptional circumstances which constitute force majeure, and to ensure the continuity of decision-making by the Court in such circumstances, it is necessary to amend its Rules of Procedure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1 Article 19 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Auditors is hereby replaced by the following: ‘Article 19 Decision-making procedure 1. The Court shall adopt its decisions in formal session, save where it applies the written procedure laid down in Article 25(5). 2. In duly justified and exceptional circumstances which constitute force majeure, in particular, major public health crises, natural disasters or acts of terrorism, determined by the President, the Court may adopt its decisions in formal session, by means of a remote meeting, namely by video or telephone conference, in which Members may participate either at the Court or at another location. The President shall call and chair such meetings and be responsible for their proper conduct. The written procedure laid down in Article 25(5) shall apply mutatis mutandis. 3. Paragraph 2 shall apply to meetings of the Chambers and of the Committees. The Dean or Chairperson of the respective Chamber or Committee shall call and chair such meetings and be responsible for their proper conduct. 4. Decisions provided for in Articles 4(4), 7(2) and 13(1), which are taken by secret ballot, may be adopted by the Court in a remote meeting under paragraph 2 of this Article, provided that the secrecy of the vote is ensured.’.

Article 2 This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
NoL170/34 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 27.6.73
II
(Actswhosepublicationisnotobligatory)
COMMISSION
Estimateofsupplyofanddemandforbeefandvealintheprocessingindustry
fortheperiodfrom1Julyto30September1973
(73/154/EEC)
THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ;
HavingregardtoCouncilRegulation (EEC)No
805/68(*)of27June1968onthecommonorganiza­
tionofthemarketinbeefandveal,aslastamended
byRegulation(EEC)No187/73(2),andinparticular
Article14(2)thereof;
Whereasthetonnageappearinginthisestimateisin
accordancewiththeOpinionoftheManagement
CommitteeforBeefandVeal:Thisestimatecoverstheperiodfrom1Julyto30
September1973.
Demandintheindustryformeatforprocessingcan
beassessedbyreferencetothequantitiesoffreshand
frozenmeatprocessedquarterly.
Communitysuppliesofmeatforprocessingcanbe
estimatedonthebasisofthequantitiesofCommu­
nityproducedandimportedfresh,chilledandfrozen
meatnormallyusedforthispurpose.
Tofindthedeficittobecoveredimportsoffrozen
meateffectedunderthespecialarrangementsdefined
inArticle14(3)(b)ofRegulation (EEC)No805/68
duringthethirdquarterof1973,theneedsofindus­
triesmanufacturing thepreservedmeatsreferredtoin
paragraph2ofthatArticlemustbedeductedfromthe
overallneedoftheprocessingindustries.HASADOPTEDTHISESTIMATE :
Conclusion
Inviewoftheabove,thedeficitfortheperiodfrom1
Julyto30September1973offrozenmeatfor
processingisestimatedat90000tons(unbonedmeat).
100kgofbonedmeatisequivalentto130kgof
unbonedmeat.On11December1972theCounciladopted,pursuant
toArticle14(2)ofRegulation (EEC)No805/68,an
estimateofsupplyofanddemandforbeefandvealin
theprocessingindustryfortheperiod1Januaryto31
December1973.Thiswasbasedonanestimateof
Communitysuppliesofmeatofthequalityandtype
ofcutsuitableforindustrialuse—called'meatfor
processing'—andofindustrialneeds,includingthe
needsofindustriesproducingthepreservedmeats
listedinArticle1(c)ofthesameRegulationand
whichdonotcontaincharacteristiccomponentsother
thanbeefandjelly.
ThelastparagraphofArticle14(2)ofRegulation
(EEC)No805/68readsasfollows:'Anestimatevalid
forthefollowingthreemonthsshallbeestablished
eachquarter,inaccordancewiththeprocedurelaid
downinArticle27,takingthemarketsituationinto
account.'DoneatBrussels,25June1973.
FortheCommission
ThePresident
Francois-Xavier ORTOLI
(')OJNoL148,28.6.1968,p.24.
(2)OJNoL25,30.1.1973,p.23.
NoL15/30 OfficialJournaloftheEuropeanCommunities 18.1.77
COMMISSION
Estimateofbeefintendedfortheprocessingindustryfortheperiod1Januaryto
31March1977
(77/65/EEC)
quarter,inaccordancewiththeprocedurelaiddown
inArticle27,takingthemarketsituationinto
account'.
Theremovalfromstorageofmeatunderprivate
storagecontractspursuanttoCommissionRegulation
(EEC)No1204/76of21May1976providingforinvi­
tationstotendertodetermineamountsofprivate
storageaidinrespectofbeefandveal(3),andto
CommissionRegulation (EEC)No1500/76of25
June1976onthegrantingofprivatestorageaidfor
beefatastandardratefixedinadvance(4),aslast
amendedbyRegulation(EEC)No2399/76(5),andthe
temporarymaintenanceofthesystemintroducedby
Commission Regulation (EEC)No76/76of16
January1976settingupasystemlinkingimportsof
beefandvealproductseffectedbywayofprotective
measureswiththesaleofbeefheldbyintervention
agencies(6),aslastamendedbyRegulation(EEC)No
3117/76(7),makeitpossibletoestimatethatCommu­
nitysuppliesofprocessingmeatwillbesufficientfor
industrialneeds.
Conclusion
Accountbeingtakenoftheforegoing,azerodeficitis
estimatedfortheperiod1Januaryto31March1977.
DoneatBrussels,3January1977.THECOMMISSION OFTHEEUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ,
HavingregardtotheTreatyestablishingtheEuropean
EconomicCommunity ,
HavingregardtoCouncilRegulation (EEC)No
805/68of27June1968onthecommonorganization
ofthemarketinbeefandveal('),aslastamendedby
Regulation (EEC)No568/76(2),andinparticularthe
lastsubparagraph ofArticle14(2)thereof,
Whereasthepresentestimateisinaccordancewith
theopinionoftheManagementCommitteeforBeef
andVeal,
HASADOPTEDTHISESTIMATE :
TheCouncil,on21December1976,inaccordance
withthefirstsubparagraphofArticle14(2)ofRegula­
tion(EEC)No805/68,adoptedtheestimateofthe
quantityofbeefintendedfortheprocessingindustry
fortheperiod1Januaryto31December1977,taking
accountontheonehandofexpectedCommunity
suppliesofmeatofaqualityandtypeofcutsuitable
forindustrialuse—knownasprocessingmeat—
and,ontheother,ofindustrialneeds,includingthe
needsofindustriesproducingpreservedfoodsasspeci­
fiedinArticle1(c)ofthesaidRegulationandwhich
donotcontaincharacteristiccomponentsotherthan
beefandjelly.
Thelastsubparagraph ofArticle14(2)ofRegulation
(EEC)No805/68providesthat'anestimatevalidfor
thefollowingthreemonthsshallbeestablishedeachFortheCommission
P.J.LARDINOIS
MemberoftheCommission
(3)OJNoL133,22.5.1976,p.28.
(4)OJNoL167,26.6.1976,p.31.
(5)OJNoL270,2.10.1976,p.18.
(6)OJNoL10,17.1.1976,p.21.
(7)OJNoL352,22.12.1976,p.14.(')OJNoL148,28.6.1968,p.24.
(2)OJNoL67,15.3.1976,p.9.
*****

Application of Article 27 of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on value added tax (1)

(Authorization of a derogation requested by the United Kingdom to enable certain types of tax evasion to be prevented)

(85/369/EEC)

In a letter dated 15 March 1985 the United Kingdom Government notified the Commission, pursuant to the above provisions, of its intention to introduce, for a period of two years, a measure derogating from the Sixth Directive in order to prevent tax evasion by introducing a system for charging VAT in cases where the marketing structure of certain firms is based on the sale of their products to unregistered resellers.

The Commission informed the other Member States by letter on 12 April 1985 of the United Kingdom Government's intention.

Under the provisions of Article 27 (4) of the Sixth Directive the Council's decision shall be deemed to have been adopted if, within two months of the other Member States being informed as laid down in the previous paragraph, neither the Commission nor any Member State has requested that the matter be raised by the Council.

As neither the Commission nor any Member State has made such a request within the period specified, the Council's decision is deemed to have been adopted on 13 June 1985.

(1) OJ No L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1.
Statement re Article 20 of Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (1)

STATEMENT RE ARTICLE 20

The Council and the Commission state that in open and restricted procedures all negotiations with candidates or tenderers on fundamental aspects of contracts, variations in which are likely to distort competition, and in particular on prices, shall be ruled out; however, discussions with candidates or tenderers may be held but only for the purpose of clarifying or supplementing the content of their tenders or the requirements of the contracting entities and provided this does not involve discrimination.

(1) OJ No L 199, 9. 8. 1993, p. 84.
32001X1228(01)R(01)

Corrigendum to the Council Act of 17 December 2001 appointing a Deputy Director of Europol (OJ C 371 of 28.12.2001)



Official Journal C 076 , 27/03/2002 P. 0012 - 0012
(b)

page 69 between the table for ‘Species: Common sole/Solea solea’ in ‘Zone: VIIh, j, k SOL/7HJK.’ and the table for ‘Species: Sprat/Sprattus sprattus’ in ‘Zone: IIIa SPR/03A.’ the following two tables shall be inserted: ‘Species: Common sole Solea solea Zone: VIIIa, b SOL/8AB. Belgium 50 Spain 9 France 3 722 The Netherlands 279 EC 4 060 TAC 4 060 Analytical TAC.Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 applies.Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 applies.Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 applies.

Species: Sole Solea spp. Zone: VIIIc,d,e, IX, X, CECAF 34.1.1 (EC waters) SOX/8CDE34 Spain 458 Portugal 758 EC 1 216 TAC 1 216 Precautionary TAC.Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 applies.Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 applies.Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 applies.’
—

the Protocol of 24 July 1996, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the interpretation, by way of preliminary rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office: Pursuant to Article 2 of the Protocol on the interpretation, by way of preliminary rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Europol Convention, the Republic of Bulgaria declares that it accepts the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in accordance with the procedures specified in Article 2(2)(a).’
EN Official Journal of the European Union L 119/40

ADDENDUM

to POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION ATALANTA/3/2009 of 21 April 2009 on the setting up of the Committee of Contributors for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) (2009/369/CFSP)

(Official Journal of the European Union L 112 of 6 May 2009)

The following Annex shall be added to Political and Security Committee Decision Atalanta/3/2009 of 21 April 2009:
Notice concerning the applications of nuclear energy

Because of the importance of processes for the decomposition of water by chemical cycles in the context of widening the applications of nuclear energy, the Commission of the European Communities intends to promote concerted action in this field. To this end it invites agencies, undertakings and institutes planning or already carrying out research programmes in this field to communicate these programmes to it pursuant to Article 5 of the Euratom Treaty.

Communications should be addressed to the Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General for Industrial, Technological and Scientific Affairs, 200 rue de la Loi, B 1040 Brussels.

A copy of the communication should also be sent to the Scientific Director, Ispra Establishment, Joint Research Centre, Ispra (Varise), Italy.
DECISION No 75 of 22 February 1973 concerning the investigation of applications for review made under Article 94 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 by invalidity pensioners

THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS;

Having regard to Article 81 (a) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, under which it is made responsible for dealing with all administrative questions arising from the provisions of Regulations (EEC) Nos 1408/71 and 574/72;

Whereas Decision No 2 published in the Official Journal of the European Communities No 64 of 17 December 1959 has been rendered unvalid by the entry into force or Regulations (EEC) Nos 1408/71 and 574/72, but, taking into account the provisions of the said Regulations, there are grounds for adopting a new decision specifying to what extent a fresh medical report drawn up on Form E 213 and, where appropriate, on Form E 214, can be required when an application is made for the review of an invalidity pension under the provisions of Article 94 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71;

HAS DECIDED:

1. When a worker makes an application for the review of an invalidity pension under the provisions of Article 94 (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, it shall not be necessary to carry out a fresh medical examination and complete out Form E 213 and, where appropriate, Form E 214, provided that the documents contained in the file can be regarded as adequate. Otherwise, the institutions concerned may request a fresh medical report using the aforementioned forms.

2. This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. It shall apply to the six Founder Member States as from 1 October 1972 and, in accordance with the Treaty of Accession, as from 1 April 1973 for the three new Member States.

The President of the Administrative Commission

J. DONIS
DECISION No 77 of 22 February 1973 concerning the calculation of family allowances pursuant to Article 73 (2) and Article 74 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71

THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS;

Having regard to Article 81 (a) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 under which it is made responsible for dealing with all administrative questions arising from the provisions of Regulations (EEC) Nos 1408/71 and 574/72;

Whereas Decision No 25, published in the Official Journal of the European Communities No 13 of 17 February 1961 has been rendered unvalid by the entry into force of Regulations (EEC) Nos 1408/71 and 574/72, but, taking into account the provisions of the said Regulations there are grounds for adopting a new decision;

Whereas there are grounds in particular for laying down specific procedures for the application of the principles laid down in Article 73 (2) and Article 74 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, wherever the legislation of the Member State or Member States other than France in which the members of the family of the worker reside provides for rules and in particular differing amounts for various categories of workers and also wherever the legislation of Member States other than France in the territory of which the children of the worker are dispersed, provides for differing amounts according to the position of the child in the family;

HAS DECIDED:

1. Wherever the legislation of the Member State or Member States other than France in which the members of the family of the worker reside provides for rules and in particular differing amounts for various categories of workers, family allowances shall be paid in accordance with the rules and the amounts which would apply if the worker pursued his professional or trade activity in the State wherein the members of his family reside.

2. Wherever the legislation of the Member States other than France in the territory of which the children of the worker are dispersed provides for differing amounts according to the position in the family of the child, the institution of each of those States shall pay the family allowances in respect of the children residing in its territory as if all the children were living in that State.

3. This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. It shall apply to the six Founder Member States as from 1 October 1972 and, in accordance with the Treaty of Accession, as from 1 April 1973 for the three new Member States.

The President of the Administrative Commission

J. DONIS