ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 35/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5294 — Schaeffler/Continental)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 35/05)

On 19 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 47/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5439 — OP Trust/Deutsche Bank London/Lloyds TSB Bank/BNP Paribas/Porterbrook Leasing)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 47/03)

On 5 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 31/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5168 — EADS/SSTL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 31/03)

On 17 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 84/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5465 — ORKLA/SAPA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 84/03

On 2 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 56/28

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5475 — Atlantia/Acciona/Itínere Chilean Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 56/03)

On 26 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 101/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5432 — Credit Mutuel/Cofidis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 101/01

On 24 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 139/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5524 — METEO-FRANCE/CDC/NYSE EURONEXT/METNEXT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 139/01

On 9 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 148/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5152 — Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 148/03

On 21 April 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 216/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5606 — UNIQA/Veneto Banca/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 216/02

On 31 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 199/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5581 — Euroports Holdings/Benelux Port Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 199/04

On 19 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 236/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5613 — Piraeus Bank/BNP Paribas/Greek JV/Swiss JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 236/01

On 24 September 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 262/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5476 — PFIZER/WYETH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 262/01

On 17 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 259/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5636 — Mcjunkin/Transmark)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 259/01

On 13 October 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 286/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5631 — Symboled/Zumtobel/Ledon Oled JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 286/01

On 20 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 261/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5625 — British Land/Blackstone/Broadgate Estate)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 261/01

On 16 October 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 307/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5660 — RBS/Deutsche Bank/Spin HoldCo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 307/01

On 10 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 302/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5684 — BNP Paribas Assurance/Fortis Insurance International/UBI Assicurazioni)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 302/01

On 4 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 18.2.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/ 2119

C(2010) 1059

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5749 - GLENCORE/ CHEMOIL ENERGY Notification of 14.01.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 18, 23.01.2010, p.36.

1. On 14.01.2010, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the EC Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Glencore International AG ("GIAG", Switzerland) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation sole control of Chemoil Energy Limited ("Chemoil Energy ", Hong Kong), controlled by the Chandran Family Trust by way of purchase of shares.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for GIAG: worldwide supplier of commodities and raw materials. Its business is organised around three sectors: metals and minerals, energy products and agricultural products;

- for Chemoil Energy: supplier of marine fuel products in the Americas, Europe and Asia.

2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 (c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32 ("Notice on a simplified procedure").
|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 16.03.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/3214/3215/3216

C(2010)1866

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

| |To the notifying parties |

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5809 - MITSUBISHI/ JGC/ EBARA/ EES Notification of 17.02.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 46, 24.02.2010, p.12

1. On 17.02.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the EC Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Mitsubishi Corporation (‘Mitsubishi’, Japan), JGC Corporation (‘JGC’, Japan) and Ebara Corporation (‘Ebara’, Japan) will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation joint control of the Ebara Engineering Service Co. Ltd (‘EES’, Japan) by way of sale and purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Mitsubishi: a conglomerate active worldwide in many sectors including energy, metals, machinery, chemicals, food and general merchandise,

- for JGC: design, construction and operation of industrial plants and refineries,

- for Ebara: fluid transfer machinery (pumps, compressors, etc.), environmental facilities and related equipment (water waste, solid waste treatment etc.) and precision machinery for semiconductor industry,

- for EES: design, construction and operation of water treatment facilities and the provision of related services.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (Signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32 ("Notice on a simplified procedure").
|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 02/03/2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/2376/2377

PUBLIC VERSION C(2010) 1286

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5783 – STATOIL/ SVITZER/ FTTS (JV) Notification of 29.01.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 30, 06.02.2010, p. 23

1. On 29.01.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the EC Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Statoil South Riding Point, LLC (“SSRP”, USA) belonging to Statoil ASA (“Statoil”, Norway) and Svitzer (Americas) Ltd. ("Svitzer", British Virgin Islands) belonging to the group A.P. Møller – Maersk A/S (“APMM”, Denmark) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation control of the whole of Freepoint Tug & Towing Services, Limited (“FTTS”, The Bahamas) by way of purchase of shares.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- SSRP: provider of an oil storage and transshipment services;

- Statoil: integrated oil and gas company;

- Svitzer: provider of towage, salvage and other offshore supports services;

- APMM: an international conglomerate, mainly active in maritime transport;

- FTTS: a tugboat operator on the island of Grand Bahama in The Bahamas.

2. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 (a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation.

For the Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32 ("Notice on a simplified procedure").
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 110/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5763 — Dassault Systemes/IBM DS PLM Software business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 110/01

On 29 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,