ddrg/super_eurlex huggingface dataset:
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 209/12

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4057 — Korsnäs/Assidomän Cartonboard)

(2006/C 209/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 May 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 258/26

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4405 — Walter Frey Holding/Mitsubishi Motors Europe)

(2006/C 258/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 October 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
Brussels, 28-XI-2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/207195

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4438 - MACQUARIE / THAMES WATER

Notification of 23.10.2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities No. C 268, 04.11.2006, page 22.

1. On 23 October 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Macquarie Bank Limited (“Macquarie”, United Kingdom), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Thames Water Holdings plc (“Thames Water”, United Kingdom) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for undertaking Macquarie: financial and investment banking services;

- for undertaking Thames Water: provision of water and sewerage services in a designated area in and around London.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5 subparagraph c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1.

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p. 32.

--------------------------------------------------
Brussels, 15-XI-2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/206869

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4428 – AXA /Gerflor : Notification of 13/10/2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 254 - 20/10/2006 – page 13

1. On 13/10/2006 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which AXA LBO III (“AXA”, France), part of the AXA Group, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Gerflor SAS (“Gerflor”), France, by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- AXA : private equity investment

- Gerflor : PVC floor coverings

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph (b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
Brussels, 06/12/2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/207461

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4452 – Swiss Re / GE Life

Notification of 3 November 2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 275, 11.11.2006, p. 12

1. On 3 November 2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Swiss Re GB Plc (“Swiss RE GB”, UK), a subsidiary of Swiss Reinsurance Company (“Swiss Re” Switzerland) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertakings GE Live Group Limited, GE Life Services Limited and GE Insurance Holdings Limited (together “GE Life”, UK) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for undertaking Swiss Re : provider of reinsurance services ;

- for undertaking GE Life : provider of life insurance services.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 10/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4413 — Apollo Group/GE Advanced Materials)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 10/05)

On 30 November 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 6/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4301 — Alliance Boots/Cardinal Health)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/09)

On 22 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
Brussels, 22.12.2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/208453

(...PICT...)

(...PICT...)

(...PICT...)

To the Notifying party

Dear Madam and/or Sir,

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4479 - NEWS CORPORATION/JAMBA/OJOM

Notification of 17.11.2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C288, 25.11.2006, p.22

1. On 17.11.2006, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertaking News Corporation (“NewsCorp”, USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the undertakings Jamba! GmbH (“Jamba”, Germany) and Ojom GmbH (“Ojom”, Germany) purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for undertaking NewsCorp : Film, TV, cable network programming, satellite TV, magazines, newspapers, books;

- for undertaking Jamba : Mobile phone entertainment;

- for undertaking Ojom : Content for mobile entertainment.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b and c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

Philip LOWE

Director General

signed by Lowri EVANS,

Deputy Director-General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 73/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4337 — Thales/Alcatel Divisions Transport et Systèmes)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 73/05)

On 7 November 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
|COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |

Brussels , 10/02/2006

SG-Greffe(2006) D/200646

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M. 4064 – Montagu / BSN Medical Notification of 09.01.2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 011 of 17.01.2006, page 2

1. On 09.01.2006, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which the undertaking Montagu Private Equity Ltd (“MPE”, UK), through several managed funds, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking BSN Medical GmbH & Co. KG (“BSN”, Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for MPE: management of private equity funds;

- for BSN: production of professional medical products.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

(signed) Neelie KROES Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32
Brussels, 26/02/2007

SG-Greffe(2007) D/200900

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4535 – Charterhouse / Vivarte

Notification of 25.01.2007 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 23, 01/02/2007

1. On 25/01/2007 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which Charterhouse Capital Limited (“Charterhouse”, United Kingdom) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation sole control of Novarte SAS ("Novarte"; France) the ultimate parent company of the Vivarte Group (“Vivarte", France), by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Charterhouse : equity capital

- Vivarte : retailing of footwear and clothing

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 100/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4586 — Nutrilux/Provimi)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 100/03)

On 21 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 105/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4630 — Bear Stearns/Nylstar)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 105/01)

On 2 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 126/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4541 — Bridgepoint/Rodenstock)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 126/02)

On 6 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 125/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4562 — S&B/Halliburton/Cebo JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 125/09)

On 18 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 114/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4518 — Alcoa/Orkla/Soft Alloy Extrusion JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 114/05)

On 19 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 130/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4545 — Statoil/Hydro)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 130/03)

On 3 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 158/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4700 — Deutsche Bank/AIG/Pushkino Logistics Park JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 158/01)

On 28 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 149/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4683 — ABN AMRO/OSG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 149/03)

On 18 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 177/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4717 — TAC/Tower Automotive)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 177/03)

On 12 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 177/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4743 — Warburg Pincus/Bausch)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 177/01)

On 20 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,
EN Official Journal of the European Union C 203/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4688 — Nestlé/Gerber)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 203/01)

On 27 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,