EN Official Journal of the European Union L 68/23

PRACTICE DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES BEFORE THE GENERAL COURT

Table of Contents

I. WRITTEN PROCEDURE

A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

A.1. Use of technical means of communication

(1) By means of the e-Curia application

(2) By fax or email

A.2. Presentation of procedural documents

A.3. The presentation of files lodged by means of the e-Curia application

A.4. Length of pleadings

B. FORM AND CONTENT OF PLEADINGS

B.1. Direct actions

(1) Application and defence (other than in intellectual property cases)

a. Application initiating proceedings

b. Defence

(2) Application and response (in intellectual property cases)

a. Application initiating proceedings

b. Response

B.2. Appeals

a. Notice of appeal

b. Response

C. ANNEXES TO PROCEDURAL DOCUMENTS

D. REGULARISATION OF PROCEDURAL DOCUMENTS

D.1. Regularisation of applications

a. Those requirements, non-compliance with which is grounds for not serving the application

b. Procedural rules, non-compliance with which justifies delaying service

c. Procedural rules non-observance of which does not prevent service

D.2. Regularisation of lengthy applications

D.3. Regularisation of other procedural documents

E. APPLICATIONS FOR EXPEDITED PROCEDURE

F. APPLICATIONS FOR SUSPENSION OF OPERATION OR ENFORCEMENT AND OTHER INTERIM MEASURES

G. APPLICATIONS FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

a. Applications for leave to intervene

b. Joined cases

H. APPLICATIONS CONCERNING A SECOND EXCHANGE OF PLEADINGS

H.1. Applications for leave to submit a reply or rejoinder in intellectual property cases

H.2. Applications for leave to submit a reply in appeal proceedings

I. APPLICATIONS FOR HEARING OF ORAL ARGUMENT

I.1. Applications for hearing of oral argument in intellectual property cases

I.2. Applications for hearing of oral argument in appeal proceedings

J. APPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL AID

II. ORAL PROCEDURE

III. ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THESE PRACTICE DIRECTIONS

THE GENERAL COURT

Having regard to Article 150 of its Rules of Procedure;

Whereas:

It is in the interest of the sound administration of justice that practice directions be issued to the parties’ representatives, whether lawyers or agents, for the purpose of Article 19 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Statute’), dealing with the manner in which procedural documents are to be submitted and how best to prepare for the hearing before the General Court (‘the Court’);

The present directions reflect, explain and complement provisions in the Court’s Rules of Procedure and are designed to enable the parties’ representatives to take account of those matters which concern the Court, particularly those relating to translation, the internal processing of procedural documents and interpretation;

The Instructions to the Registrar dated 5 July 2007 (OJ 2007 L 232, p. 1), as amended on 17 May 2010 (OJ 2010 L 170, p. 53) and on 24 January 2012 (OJ 2012 L 68, p. 23) (‘the Instructions to the Registrar’), require the Registrar to ensure that procedural documents placed on a case-file comply with the provisions of the Statute, the Rules of Procedure and these Practice Directions (‘the Practice Directions’) together with the Instructions to the Registrar; in particular, he is to require that any irregularities of form in documents lodged be made good and, in default of such regularisation, to refuse, where appropriate, to accept them if they do not comply with the provisions of the Statute or of the Rules of Procedure;

Compliance with the Practice Directions will assure parties’ representatives, as persons concerned in the administration of justice, that the procedural documents lodged by them may properly be processed by the Court and will not, with respect to the matters dealt with in the Practice Directions, entail the application of Article 90(a) of the Rules of Procedure;

Following consultations with the representatives of the agents of the Member States, of the institutions acting in proceedings before the Court and of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE);

HEREBY DECIDES TO ADOPT THE FOLLOWING PRACTICE DIRECTIONS.

I. WRITTEN PROCEDURE

A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

A.1. Use of technical means of communication

(1) By means of the e-Curia application

1. The lodging of procedural documents by exclusively electronic means is allowed using the e-Curia application (https://curia.europa.eu/e-Curia) in compliance with the Conditions of use of the e-Curia application.

2. Annexes to a procedural document, mentioned in the body of that document, which by their nature cannot be lodged by e-Curia, may be sent separately in accordance with Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure, provided that they are mentioned in the schedule of annexes to the document lodged by e-Curia. The schedule of annexes must identify which annexes are to be lodged separately. Those annexes must reach the Registry no later than 10 days after the lodging of the procedural document by e-Curia.

3. Without prejudice to specific rules, the provisions of these Directions shall be applicable to procedural documents lodged by means of the e-Curia application.

(2) By fax or email

4. A copy of the signed original of a procedural document may be transmitted to the Registry in accordance with Article 43(6) of the Rules of Procedure either: — by fax (fax number: (+352) 4303 2100), or — by email (email address: GeneralCourt.Registry@curia.europa.eu).

5. In the case of transmission by email, only a scanned copy of the signed original will be accepted. Scanned documents should ideally be scanned at a resolution of 300 dpi and submitted in PDF (image and text) using software such as Acrobat or Readiris 7 Pro. A document dispatched in the form of an ordinary electronic file which is unsigned or bears an electronic signature or a facsimile signature generated by computer will not be treated as complying with Article 43(6) of the Rules of Procedure. Correspondence relating to a case which is received by the Court in the form of an ordinary email message will not be taken into consideration.

6. The date on which a procedural document is lodged by fax or email will be deemed to be the date of lodgment for the purposes of compliance with a time-limit only if the original of that document, bearing the representative’s handwritten signature, is lodged at the Registry no later than 10 days thereafter, as prescribed under Article 43(6) of the Rules of Procedure.

7. The signed original must be sent without delay, immediately after the dispatch of the copy, without any corrections or amendments, even of a minor nature, being made thereto. In the event of any discrepancy between the signed original and the copy previously lodged, only the date of lodging of the signed original will be taken into consideration. In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the signed original of every procedural document is to be accompanied by the adequate number of certified copies.

8. Where, in accordance with Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure, a party consents to being served by fax or other technical means of communication, the statement to that effect must specify the fax number and/or the email address for the purpose of service by the Registry. The recipient’s computer must be equipped with suitable software (for example, Acrobat or Readiris 7 Pro) enabling communications from the Registry, which will be transmitted in PDF, to be read.

A.2. Presentation of procedural documents

9. The following information must appear on the first page of the procedural document: (a) the title of the document (application, defence, response, reply, rejoinder, application for leave to intervene, statement in intervention, objection of inadmissibility, observations on …, replies to questions, etc.); (b) the case-number (T-…/…), where it has already been notified by the Registry; (c) the names of the applicant and of the defendant, and the name of any other party to the proceedings in intellectual property cases and appeals against decisions of the Civil Service Tribunal; (d) the name of the party on whose behalf the document is lodged.

10. Each paragraph of the document must be numbered.

11. In documents not lodged by means of the e-Curia application, the handwritten signature of the party’s representative is required and must appear at the end of the document. Where more than one representative is acting for the party concerned, the signing of the document by one representative shall be sufficient.

12. Procedural documents must be submitted in such a way as to enable them to be processed electronically by the Court. Accordingly, the following requirements must be complied with: (a) the text, in A4 format, must be easily legible and appear on one side of the page only; (b) paper documents produced must be placed together in such a way as to enable them to be easily undone. They must not be bound together or fixed to each other by any other means (e.g. glued or stapled); (c) the text must appear in characters that are sufficiently large to be easily read (1) with sufficient line spacing and margins to ensure that a scanned version will be legible; (2) (d) the pages of the document must be numbered consecutively in the top right-hand corner; where annexes to a document are produced, they must be paginated in accordance with the requirements at point 59 of the Practice Directions.

13. The first page of each copy of the signed original of every procedural document not lodged by means of the e-Curia application and required to be produced by the parties pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure must be initialled by the representative of the party concerned and certified by him as a true copy of the original document.

A.3. The presentation of files lodged by means of the e-Curia application

14. Procedural documents lodged by means of the e-Curia application shall be presented in the form of files. To assist the Registry in handling them, it is recommended to follow the practical guidance given in the e-Curia User Manual available on line on the Internet site of the Court of Justice of the European Union, viz: — files must include names identifying the document (Pleading, Annexes Part 1, Annexes Part 2, Covering letter, etc.); — the procedural document need not necessarily bear a handwritten signature; — the text of the procedural document can be saved in PDF direct from the word-processing software without the need of scanning; — the procedural document must include the schedule of annexes; — the annexes must be contained in one or more files separate from the file containing the procedural document. A file may contain several annexes. It is not compulsory to create one file per annex.

A.4. Length of pleadings

15. Depending on the subject-matter and the circumstances of the case, the maximum number of pages (3) shall be as follows: — 50 pages for the application and the defence; — 20 pages for the application and responses in intellectual property cases; — 15 pages for the appeal and the response; — 25 pages for the reply and the rejoinder; — 15 pages for the reply and the rejoinder in appeal cases and in intellectual property cases; — 20 pages for an objection of inadmissibility and observations thereon; — 20 pages for a statement in intervention and 15 pages for observations thereon.

16. Authorisation to exceed those maximum lengths will be given only in cases involving particularly complex legal or factual issues.

B. FORM AND CONTENT OF PLEADINGS

B.1. Direct actions

17. The Rules of Procedure contain provisions which specifically govern proceedings relating to intellectual property rights (Articles 130 to 136). The rules relating to applications and responses lodged in the context of such proceedings (2) are therefore set out separately from those relating to applications and defences lodged in the context of any other proceedings (1).

(1) Application and defence (other than in intellectual property cases)

a. Application initiating proceedings

18. The mandatory information to be included in the application initiating proceedings is prescribed by Article 44 of the Rules of Procedure.

19. The following information must appear at the beginning of the application: (a) the name and address of the applicant; (b) the name and capacity of the applicant’s representative; (c) the identity of the party against whom the application is made; (d) the statements referred to in Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure (statement of an address for service in Luxembourg and/or agreement to service by technical means of communication).

20. The introductory part of the application should be followed by a brief account of the facts giving rise to the dispute.

21. Legal arguments should be set out and grouped by reference to the particular pleas in law to which they relate. Each argument or group of arguments should generally be preceded by a summary statement of the relevant plea. In addition, the pleas in law put forward should ideally each be given a heading to enable them to be identified easily.

22. The precise wording of the form of order sought by the applicant must be stated either at the beginning or at the end of the application.

23. In the case of an action for annulment, a copy of the contested measure must be annexed to the application and identified as such.

24. The documents referred to in Article 44(3) and (5)(a) and (b) of the Rules of Procedure must be produced together with the application, but separately from the annexes mentioned in the text of the pleading. For the purposes of the production of the document required by Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure, reference may be made, in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Instructions to the Registrar, to a document previously lodged at the Registry of the Court.

25. Each application must be accompanied by a summary of the pleas in law and main arguments relied on, designed to facilitate the drafting of the notice prescribed by Article 24(6) of the Rules of Procedure. Since the notice is required to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union in all the official languages, it is requested that the summary should not exceed two pages and that it should be prepared in accordance with the model available on line on the Internet site of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It must be produced separately from the annexes mentioned in the application. The summary must, if not lodged by means of the e-Curia application, be sent by email, as an ordinary electronic file, to GeneralCourt.Registry@curia.europa.eu, indicating the case to which it relates.

26. All evidence offered in support must be expressly and accurately indicated, in such a way as to show clearly the facts to be proved: — documentary evidence offered in support must refer to the relevant document number in a schedule of annexed documents. Alternatively, if a document is not in the applicant’s possession, the pleading must indicate how the document may be obtained; — where oral testimony is sought to be given, each proposed witness or person from whom information is to be obtained must be clearly identified.

27. If the application is lodged after the submission of an application for legal aid, the effect of which, under Article 96(4) of the Rules of Procedure, is to suspend the period prescribed for the bringing of an action, this must be stated at the beginning of the application initiating proceedings.

28. If the application is lodged after notification of the order making a decision on an application for legal aid, reference must also be made in the application to the date on which the order was served on the applicant.

b. Defence

29. The mandatory information to be included in the defence is prescribed by Article 46(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

30. In addition to the case-number and the name of the applicant, the following information must appear at the beginning of the defence: (a) the name and address of the defendant; (b) the name and capacity of the defendant’s representative; (c) the statements referred to in Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure (statement of an address for service in Luxembourg and/or agreement to service by technical means of communication).

31. The precise wording of the form of order sought by the defendant must be stated either at the beginning or at the end of the defence.

32. Points 21, 24 and 26 of the Practice Directions shall apply to the defence.

33. Any fact alleged by the other party which is contested must be specified and the basis on which it is contested expressly stated.

(2) Application and response (in intellectual property cases)

a. Application initiating proceedings

34. The mandatory information to be included in the application initiating proceedings is prescribed by Articles 44 and 132(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

35. The following information must appear at the beginning of the application: (a) the name and address of the applicant; (b) the name and capacity of the applicant’s representative; (c) the names of all parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the addresses given by them for notification purposes during those proceedings; (d) the date on which the applicant was notified of the decision of the Board of Appeal that is the subject-matter of the action; (e) the statements referred to in Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure (statement of an address for service in Luxembourg and/or agreement to service by technical means of communication).

36. The contested decision of the Board of Appeal must be annexed to the application.

37. Points 20 to 22, 24, and 26 to 28 of the Practice Directions shall apply to applications in intellectual property cases.

b. Response

38. The mandatory information to be included in the response is prescribed by Article 46(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

39. In addition to the case-number and the name of the applicant, the following must appear at the beginning of the response: (a) the name and address of the defendant or of the intervener; (b) the name and capacity of the defendant’s or intervener’s representative; (c) the statements referred to in Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure (statement of an address for service in Luxembourg and/or agreement to service by technical means of communication).

40. The precise wording of the form of order sought by the defendant or by the intervener must be stated either at the beginning or at the end of the response.

41. Points 21, 24, 26 and 33 of the Practice Directions shall apply to the response. Where, prior to the response, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal lodges observations on the language of the case, in accordance with Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure, those observations shall be accompanied by the document referred to in Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure.

B.2. Appeals

a. Notice of appeal

42. The notice of appeal must contain the information prescribed by Article 138(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

43. The following must appear at the beginning of any notice of appeal: (a) the name and address of the appellant; (b) the name and capacity of the appellant’s representative; (c) a reference to the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal appealed against (nature of the decision, formation of the Tribunal, date and case-number); (d) the names of the other parties to the proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal; (e) a reference to the date of receipt by the appellant of the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal; (f) the statements referred to in Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure (statement of an address for service in Luxembourg and/or agreement to service by technical means of communication).

44. The precise wording of the form of order sought by the appellant must be stated either at the beginning or at the end of the notice (Article 139(1) of the Rules of Procedure).

45. It is not generally necessary to describe the background or subject-matter of the proceedings. A reference to the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal is sufficient.

46. It is recommended that the pleas in law be summarised at the beginning of the notice. Legal arguments should be set out and grouped by reference to the particular pleas in law in support of the appeal to which they relate, and in particular by reference to the errors of law relied on.

47. A copy of the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal appealed against shall be annexed to the notice.

48. Each notice of appeal must be accompanied by a summary of the pleas in law and main arguments relied on, designed to facilitate the drafting of the notice for publication prescribed by Article 24(6) of the Rules of Procedure. Since the notice is required to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union in all the official languages, it is requested that the summary should not exceed two pages and that it should be prepared in accordance with the model available on line on the Internet site of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It must be produced separately from the annexes mentioned in the notice of appeal. The summary must, if not lodged by means of the e-Curia application, be sent by email, as an ordinary electronic file, to GeneralCourt.Registry@curia.europa.eu, indicating the case to which it relates.

49. The document referred to in Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure (certificate that the lawyer is authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area) must be produced together with the notice of appeal, unless the party bringing the appeal is an institution of the Union or a Member State represented by an agent. For the purposes of the production of the document required by Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure, reference may be made, in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Instructions to the Registrar, to a document previously lodged at the Registry of the Court.

b. Response

50. The response must contain the information prescribed by Article 141(2) of the Rules of Procedure.

51. In addition to the case-number and the name of the appellant, the following must appear at the beginning of each response: (a) the name and address of the party submitting the response; (b) the name and capacity of that party’s representative; (c) the date of receipt of the appeal by that party; (d) the statements referred to in Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure (statement of an address for service in Luxembourg and/or agreement to service by technical means of communication).

52. The precise wording of the form of order sought by the party submitting the response must be stated either at the beginning or at the end of the response (Article 142(1) of the Rules of Procedure).

53. If the response seeks to set aside, in whole or in part, the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal on a plea in law which was not raised in the appeal, a reference to that effect should be included in the heading of the pleading (‘response and cross-appeal’).

54. Legal arguments must, as far as possible, be set out and grouped by reference to the appellant’s pleas in law and/or, as the case may be, to the pleas in law relating to the cross-appeal.

55. Since the factual and legal background is already included in the judgment under appeal, it should be repeated in the response only in truly exceptional circumstances, in so far as its presentation in the notice of appeal is contested or requires clarification. The contested matter of fact or of law must be identified and the basis of that contest clearly stated.

56. The document referred to in Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure (certificate that the lawyer is authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area) must be produced together with the response, unless the party producing it is an institution of the Union or a Member State represented by an agent.

C. ANNEXES TO PROCEDURAL DOCUMENTS

57. Only those documents mentioned in the actual text of a procedural document and which are necessary in order to prove or illustrate its contents may be submitted as annexes.

58. Annexes will be accepted only if they are accompanied by a schedule indicating, for each document annexed: (a) the number of the annex (by reference to the procedural document to which the documents are annexed, using a letter and a number: for example, Annex A.1, A.2, … for annexes to the application; B.1, B.2, … for annexes to the defence; C.1, C.2, … for annexes to the reply; D.1, D.2, … for annexes to the rejoinder); (b) a short description of the document (for example, ‘letter’, followed by its date, author and addressee and the number of pages); (c) the page reference and paragraph number in the procedural document where that document is mentioned and its relevance is described.

59. The documents annexed to a procedural document must be paginated in the top right-hand corner, in ascending order. Pagination of the documents may be made either consecutively with the procedural document to which they are annexed or consecutively but separately from that document.

60. Where annexes are documents which themselves contain annexes, they must be arranged and numbered in such a way as to avoid all possibility of confusion and should, where necessary, be separated by dividers.

61. Each reference to a document lodged must state the relevant annex number as given in the schedule of annexes and indicate the procedural document with which the annex has been lodged, in the manner described at point 58 above.

D. REGULARISATION OF PROCEDURAL DOCUMENTS

D.1. Regularisation of applications

a. Those requirements, non-compliance with which is grounds for not serving the application

62. If an application does not comply with the following requirements, the Registry shall not serve it and a reasonable period shall be prescribed for the purposes of putting it in order: Direct actions (other than intellectual property) Intellectual property cases Appeals (a) production of the certificate of the lawyer’s authorisation to practise (Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure) production of the certificate of the lawyer’s authorisation to practise (Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure) production of the certificate of the lawyer’s authorisation to practise (Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure) (b) proof of the existence in law of a legal person governed by private law (Article 44(5)(a) of the Rules of Procedure) proof of the existence in law of a legal person governed by private law (Article 44(5)(a) of the Rules of Procedure) (c) authority (Article 44(5)(b) of the Rules of Procedure) authority (Article 44(5)(b) of the Rules of Procedure) (d) proof that that authority has been properly conferred by someone authorised for the purpose (Article 44(5)(b) of the Rules of Procedure) proof that that authority has been properly conferred by someone authorised for the purpose (Article 44(5)(b) of the Rules of Procedure) (e) production of the contested measure (action for annulment) or of the documentary evidence of the date on which the institution was requested to act (action for failure to act) (second paragraph of Article 21 of the Statute; Article 44(4) of the Rules of Procedure) production of the contested decision of the Board of Appeal (second subparagraph of Article 132(1) of the Rules of Procedure) production of the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal that is the subject of the appeal (Article 138(2) of the Rules of Procedure) (f) the names of the parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the addresses which they had given for the purposes of the notifications to be effected in the course of those proceedings (first subparagraph of Article 132(1) of the Rules of Procedure) (g) the date on which the decision of the Board of Appeal was notified (second subparagraph of Article 132(1) of the Rules of Procedure) the date on which the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal that is the subject of the appeal was notified (Article 138(2) of the Rules of Procedure)

b. Procedural rules, non-compliance with which justifies delaying service

63. If an application does not comply with the following procedural rules, service of the application shall be delayed and a reasonable period shall be prescribed for the purposes of putting the application in order: Application lodged in paper format (lodgment preceded, as the case may be, by dispatch by fax or email) Application lodged by e-Curia (a) indication of the applicant’s address (first paragraph of Article 21 of the Statute; Article 44(1)(a) of the Rules of Procedure; point 19(a), 35(a) or 43(a) of the Practice Directions) indication of the applicant’s address (first paragraph of Article 21 of the Statute; Article 44(1)(a) of the Rules of Procedure; point 19(a), 35(a) or 43(a) of the Practice Directions) (b) position of the representative’s handwritten signature (point 11 of the Practice Directions) (c) paragraph numbering (point 10 of the Practice Directions) paragraph numbering (point 10 of the Practice Directions) (d) production of the annexes mentioned in the schedule (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure) production of the annexes mentioned in the schedule (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure) (e) sufficient number of copies of the annexes mentioned in the schedule (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure) (f) production of a schedule of annexes (Article 43(4) of the Rules of Procedure and point 58 of the Practice Directions) production of a schedule of annexes (Article 43(4) of the Rules of Procedure and point 58 of the Practice Directions) (g) sufficient number of copies of the schedule (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure) (h) schedule of annexes with a short description of each document (point 58(b) of the Practice Directions) and page reference and paragraph number(s) (point 58(c) of the Practice Directions) schedule of annexes with a short description of each document (point 58(b) of the Practice Directions) and page reference and paragraph number(s) (point 58(c) of the Practice Directions) (i) sufficient number of copies of the schedule of annexes with page reference and paragraph number(s) (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure) (j) sufficient number of copies of the contested measure or of the documentary evidence of the date on which the institution was requested to act (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure) (k) production of a copy of the contract containing the arbitration clause (Article 44(5a) of the Rules of Procedure) production of a copy of the contract containing the arbitration clause (Article 44(5a) of the Rules of Procedure) (l) sufficient number of copies of the contract containing the arbitration clause (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure) (m) pagination of the application and annexes (points 12(d) and 59 of the Practice Directions) pagination of the application and annexes (points 12(d) and 59 of the Practice Directions) (n) sufficient number of certified copies of the application (seven for inter partes intellectual property cases and six for all other cases) (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure) (o) production of certified true copies of the application (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure; point 13 of the Practice Directions)

c. Procedural rules non-observance of which does not prevent service

64. If the application does not comply with the following procedural rules, the application shall be served and a reasonable period shall be prescribed for the purposes of putting it in order: (a) address for service (statement of an address for service in Luxembourg and/or agreement to service by technical means of communication) (Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure; Article 10(3) of the Instructions to the Registrar; points 8 and 19(d) of the Practice Directions); (b) certificate of authorisation to practise in respect of any additional lawyer (Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure); (c) other than in intellectual property cases, a summary of the pleas in law and main arguments (points 25 and 48 of the Practice Directions); (d) translation into the language of the case accompanying any document drafted in a language other than the language of the case (second subparagraph of Article 35(3) of the Rules of Procedure).

D.2. Regularisation of lengthy applications

65. An application comprising a number of pages which exceeds the maximum number of pages prescribed at point 15 of the Practice Directions by 40% or more shall require regularisation, unless otherwise directed by the President.

66. An application comprising a number of pages which exceeds the maximum number of pages prescribed at point 15 of the Practice Directions by less than 40% may require regularisation if so directed by the President.

67. Where an applicant is requested to put his application in order, service on the defendant of the application which requires regularisation on account of its length shall be delayed.

D.3. Regularisation of other procedural documents

68. The instances of regularisation referred to above shall apply as necessary to procedural documents other than the application.

E. APPLICATIONS FOR EXPEDITED PROCEDURE

69. An application in respect of which the expedited procedure is requested must not in principle exceed 25 pages. Such an application must be submitted in accordance with the requirements set out at points 18 to 25 above.

70. An application for a case to be decided by the Court under the expedited procedure must be made by a separate document in accordance with Article 76a of the Rules of Procedure and must contain a brief statement of the reasons for the special urgency of the case and any other relevant circumstances. The provisions of Sections A.2, A.3 and C above shall apply.

71. It is recommended that the party applying for the expedited procedure specify in its application the pleas in law, arguments or passages of the pleading in question (application or defence) which are put forward only in the event that the case is not decided under the expedited procedure. That information, referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 76a(1) of the Rules of Procedure, must be clearly specified in the application, indicating the numbers of the paragraphs concerned.

72. It is recommended also that an abbreviated version of the relevant pleading be annexed to any application for a case to be decided under the expedited procedure which contains the information referred to in the preceding point.

73. Where an abbreviated version is annexed, it must comply with the following directions: (a) the abbreviated version shall be in the same format as the original version of the pleading in question, with omitted passages being identified by the word ‘omissis’ in square brackets; (b) paragraphs which are retained in the abbreviated version shall keep the same numbering as in the original version of the pleading in question; (c) if the abbreviated version does not refer to all of the annexes to the original version of the pleading in question, the schedule of annexes accompanying the abbreviated version shall identify each annex omitted by the word ‘omissis’; (d) annexes which are retained in the abbreviated version must keep the same numbering as in the schedule of annexes in the original version of the pleading in question; (e) the annexes referred to in the schedule accompanying the abbreviated version must be attached to that version.

74. In order to ensure that it is dealt with as expeditiously as possible, the abbreviated version must comply with the above directions.

75. Where the production of an abbreviated version of the pleading is requested by the Court under Article 76a(4) of the Rules of Procedure, the abbreviated version must be prepared in accordance with the above directions, unless otherwise specified.

76. If the applicant has not specified in his application for expedited procedure the pleas in law, arguments or passages of the application which are to be taken into consideration only in the event that the case is not decided under the expedited procedure, the defendant must respond to the application initiating proceedings within a period of one month.

77. If the applicant has specified in his application for expedited procedure the pleas in law, arguments or passages of the application which are to be taken into consideration only in the event that the case is not decided under the expedited procedure, the defendant must respond, within a period of one month, to the pleas in law and arguments advanced in the application, in the light of the information provided in the application for the expedited procedure.

78. If the applicant has attached an abbreviated version of the application to his application for expedited procedure, the defendant must respond, within a period of one month, to the pleas in law and arguments contained in that abbreviated version of the application.

79. If the Court decides to reject the application for an expedited procedure before the defendant has lodged his defence, the period of one month for lodgment of the defence prescribed under the first subparagraph of Article 76a(2) of the Rules of Procedure shall be extended by a further month.

80. If the Court decides to reject the application for an expedited procedure after the defendant has lodged his defence within the period of one month prescribed by the first subparagraph of Article 76a(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the defendant shall be allowed a further period of one month in order to supplement his defence.

F. APPLICATIONS FOR SUSPENSION OF OPERATION OR ENFORCEMENT AND OTHER INTERIM MEASURES

81. The application must be made by a separate document. It must be intelligible in itself, without necessitating reference to the application lodged in the main proceedings.

82. An application for suspension of operation or enforcement or for other interim measures must state, with the utmost concision, the subject-matter of the proceedings, the pleas of fact and of law on which the main action is based (establishing a prima facie case on the merits in that action) and the circumstances giving rise to urgency. It must specify the measure(s) applied for. Sections A.2, A.3, B and C above shall apply.

83. Because an application for interim measures requires the existence of a prima facie case to be assessed for the purposes of a summary procedure, it need not set out in full the text of the application in the main proceedings.

84. In order that an application for interim measures may be dealt with urgently, the number of pages it contains must not in principle (depending on the subject-matter and the circumstances of the case) exceed a maximum of 25 pages.

G. APPLICATIONS FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

85. Without prejudice to the provisions of the second and third subparagraphs of Article 67(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court shall take into consideration only those documents which have been made available to the parties’ representatives and on which they have been given an opportunity of expressing their views (first subparagraph of Article 67(3) of the Rules of Procedure).

86. Nevertheless, a party may apply for certain parts or passages of the procedural documents placed in the case-file that are secret or confidential: — to be excluded from the documents to be furnished to an intervener (Article 116(2) of the Rules of Procedure); — not to be made available to a party in a joined case (Article 50(2) of the Rules of Procedure).

87. An application for confidential treatment shall be made by a separate document. It may not be lodged as a confidential version.

88. Such an application must specify the party in relation to whom confidentiality is requested. It must be limited to what is strictly necessary and may not in any event cover the entirety of a procedural document; only exceptionally may it extend to the entirety of an annexed document. It should usually be possible to furnish a non-confidential version of a document in which passages, words or figures have been deleted without affecting the interests it is sought to protect.

89. An application for confidential treatment must accurately identify the particulars or passages to be excluded and state very briefly the reasons for which each of those particulars or passages is regarded as secret or confidential. Failure to provide such information may result in the application being rejected by the Court.

90. On lodging an application for confidential treatment in respect of one or more procedural documents, a party must produce a non-confidential version of each procedural document concerned with the confidential material deleted.

a. Applications for leave to intervene

91. Where an application is made for leave to intervene in a case, the parties are requested to state, within the period prescribed by the Registrar to that effect, whether they wish to seek confidential treatment in respect of certain information included in the documents already placed on the case-file.

92. With regard to all documents that the parties may lodge subsequently, the parties must specify, in accordance with points 87 to 90 above, the information for which confidential treatment is sought, and provide, in addition to the full version of the documents lodged, a version from which the information in question has been removed. In the absence of such indication, the documents lodged will be furnished to the intervener.

b. Joined cases

93. Where it is envisaged that several cases will be joined, the parties are requested to state, within the period prescribed by the Registrar to that effect, whether they wish to seek confidential treatment in respect of certain information included in the documents already placed on the case-files.

94. With regard to all documents that the parties may lodge subsequently, the parties must specify, in accordance with points 88 to 90 above, the information for which confidential treatment is sought, and provide, in addition to the full version of the documents lodged, a version from which the information in question has been removed. In the absence of such indication, the documents lodged will be made available to the other parties.

H. APPLICATIONS CONCERNING A SECOND EXCHANGE OF PLEADINGS

H.1. Applications for leave to submit a reply or rejoinder in intellectual property cases

95. Under Article 135(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the President may, on application within the period prescribed by that provision, allow a reply or a rejoinder to be submitted if it is necessary in order to enable the party concerned to put forward his point of view.

96. Save in exceptional circumstances, such an application must not exceed 2 pages and must be confined to summarising the precise reasons for which, in the opinion of the party concerned, a reply or a rejoinder is necessary. The request must be intelligible in itself, without necessitating reference to the application or to the response(s).

H.2. Applications for leave to submit a reply in appeal proceedings

97. Under Article 143(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the President may, on application within the period prescribed by that provision, allow a reply to be submitted if it is necessary in order to enable the appellant to put forward his point of view or in order to provide a basis for the decision on the appeal.

98. Save in exceptional circumstances, such an application must not exceed 2 pages and must be confined to summarising the precise reasons for which, in the appellant’s opinion, a reply is necessary. The request must be intelligible in itself, without necessitating reference to the appeal or to the response.

I. APPLICATIONS FOR HEARING OF ORAL ARGUMENT

I.1. Applications for hearing of oral argument in intellectual property cases

99. The Court may decide to rule on the appeal without an oral procedure, unless one of the parties submits an application to be heard within the period prescribed under Article 135a of the Rules of Procedure.

100. The application must set out the reasons for which the party wishes to be heard. That reasoning must be based on a real assessment of the benefit of a hearing to the party in question and must indicate the elements of the file or arguments which that party considers it necessary to develop or refute more fully at a hearing. It is not sufficient to provide a general statement of reasons referring to the importance of the case or of the questions to be decided.

I.2. Applications for hearing of oral argument in appeal proceedings

101. The Court may decide to rule on the appeal without an oral procedure, unless one of the parties submits an application to be heard within the period prescribed under Article 146 of the Rules of Procedure.

102. The application must set out the reasons for which the party wishes to be heard. That reasoning must be based on a real assessment of the benefit of a hearing to the party in question and must indicate the elements of the file or arguments which that party considers it necessary to develop or refute more fully at a hearing. It is not sufficient to provide a general statement of reasons referring to the importance of the case or of the questions to be decided.

J. APPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL AID

103. The use of a form in making an application for legal aid is compulsory. The form is available on the Internet site of the Court of Justice of the European Union at http://curia.europa.eu.

104. The form may also be obtained on request from the Registry of the Court either by sending an email stating the applicant’s name and address to GeneralCourt.Registry@curia.europa.eu, or by writing to the following address: Registry of the General Court of the European Union Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald L-2925 Luxembourg

105. Any request for legal aid submitted otherwise than by using the application form will not be taken into consideration and will give rise to a reply from the Registrar reiterating that the use of the form is compulsory and attaching a copy of the form.

106. The original application for legal aid must be signed by the legal aid applicant or by his lawyer. However, if the application is lodged by means of e-Curia by the applicant’s lawyer, the lawyer’s signature is not required.

107. If the application for legal aid is submitted by the legal aid applicant’s lawyer before the application initiating proceedings has been lodged, it must be accompanied by the document referred to in Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure (certificate that the lawyer is authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area). For the purposes of the production of the document required by Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure, reference may be made, in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Instructions to the Registrar, to a document previously lodged at the Registry of the Court.

108. The application form is intended to provide the Court, in accordance with Article 95(2) of the Rules of Procedure, with the information required to give an effective decision on the application for legal aid. The information required concerns: — the legal aid applicant’s economic situation; and, — where the action has not yet been brought, the subject-matter of the action, the facts of the case and the arguments relating thereto.

109. The legal aid applicant is required to produce, together with the application form, documentary evidence to support his assertions.

110. The duly completed form and supporting documents must be intelligible in themselves, without reference to any other letters lodged at the Registry by the legal aid applicant.

111. Without prejudice to the Court’s power to request information or the production of further documents under Article 64 of the Rules of Procedure, the application for legal aid may not be supplemented by the subsequent filing of additional material. Such material will be returned, unless it has been lodged at the request of the Court. In exceptional cases, supporting documents intended to establish the applicant’s lack of means may nevertheless be accepted subsequently, subject to the delay in their production being adequately explained.

112. Under Article 96(4) of the Rules of Procedure, the introduction of an application for legal aid is to suspend the period prescribed for the bringing of the action to which the application refers until the date of notification of the order making a decision on that application or, where no lawyer is designated in that order to represent the person concerned, until the date of service of the order designating the lawyer instructed to represent the legal aid applicant.

113. The suspension shall take effect from the date on which the form is lodged or, where the request for legal aid is submitted without using the form, from the date on which that request is lodged, provided that the form is returned within the period prescribed by the Registry to that effect in the letter referred to at point 105 above. If the form is not returned within the prescribed period, the suspension shall take effect from the date on which the form is lodged.

114. Where the form is lodged by fax or email, the original, bearing the handwritten signature of the lawyer or of the applicant, must reach the Registry of the Court no more than 10 days after such lodgment, in order for the date of lodgment of the fax or email to be taken into account in the suspension of the time-limit for bringing an action. If the original form is not lodged within that 10-day period, the suspension of the time-limit for bringing an action shall take effect on the date on which the original form is lodged. In the event of any discrepancy between the signed original and the copy previously lodged, only the signed original will be taken into account, and the relevant date for the purpose of suspension of the time-limit for bringing an action will be the date on which that original was lodged.

II. ORAL PROCEDURE

115. The oral procedure exists: — where necessary, to reiterate in condensed form the position taken by the parties, emphasising the key submissions advanced in writing; — to clarify, if necessary, certain arguments advanced during the written procedure and to submit any new arguments arising from events occurring after the close of the written procedure and which therefore could not have been set out in the pleadings; — to reply to any questions put by the Court.

116. It is for each party to assess, in the light of the purpose of the oral procedure, as defined in the preceding point, whether oral argument is really necessary or whether it would be sufficient simply to refer to the pleadings or written observations. The oral procedure can then concentrate on the replies to questions put by the Court. If the representative does consider it necessary to address the Court, he may always confine himself to making specific points and referring to the pleadings in relation to other points.

117. If a party refrains from presenting oral argument, this will never be construed as constituting acquiescence in the oral argument presented by another party where the arguments in question have already been refuted in writing. Such silence will not preclude that party from responding to the other party’s submission.

118. In some cases, the Court may consider it preferable to start the oral procedure with questions put by its Members to the parties’ representatives. In that case, the latter are requested to take this into account if they then wish to make a brief address.

119. In the interests of clarity and in order to enable the Members of the Court to understand oral submissions better, it is generally preferable for Counsel to speak freely on the basis of notes rather than to read out a written text. The parties’ representatives are also requested to simplify their presentation of the case as far as possible; a series of short sentences will always be preferable to a long, complicated sentence. It would also assist the Court if representatives could structure their oral argument and indicate, before developing it, the structure they intend to adopt.

120. When the submission has been prepared in writing, it is advisable to bear in mind when drafting it that it will have to be presented orally and should therefore resemble a spoken text as much as possible. To facilitate interpretation, parties’ representatives are requested to send any text or written notes for their submissions to the Directorate for Interpretation in advance either by fax ((+352) 4303 3697) or by email (interpret@curia.europa.eu).

121. Any notes for submissions thus transmitted will be treated in the strictest confidence. To avoid any misunderstanding, the name of the party must be stated. Notes for submissions will not be placed on the case-file.

122. Representatives are reminded that, depending on the case being heard, only some of the Members of the bench may be following the oral argument in the language in which it is being presented; the other Members will be listening to the simultaneous interpretation. In the interests of the better conduct of the oral procedure and of maintaining the quality of the simultaneous interpretation, representatives are strongly advised to speak slowly and directly into the microphone.

123. Where representatives intend to cite verbatim passages from certain texts or documents, particularly passages not appearing in the case-file, it would be helpful if they would indicate the passages concerned to the interpreters before the hearing. Similarly, it may be helpful to draw the interpreters’ attention to any terms which may be difficult to translate.

124. As the courtrooms are equipped with an automatic sound amplification system, representatives need to press the button on the microphone in order to switch it on and wait for the light to come on before starting to speak. The button should not be pressed while a Member of the Court or another person is speaking, in order not to cut off their microphone.

125. The time taken in presenting oral submissions may vary, depending on the complexity of the case and on whether or not new facts have arisen. The representatives of the main parties are requested to limit their oral submissions to 15 minutes or thereabouts for each party, and those of any intervener to 10 minutes (in joined cases, each of the main parties will be allowed 15 minutes for each case and each intervener will be allowed 10 minutes for each case), unless the Registry has indicated otherwise. These limitations apply only to the presentation of oral argument itself and not to time spent in answering questions put at the hearing.

126. If circumstances so require, a request for leave to exceed the speaking time normally allowed, giving reasons and indicating the speaking time considered necessary, may be made to the Registry at least 15 days (or less, in duly substantiated exceptional circumstances) before the date fixed for the hearing. When such requests are made, representatives will be informed of the time which they will have for presenting their oral submissions.

127. When several representatives act for a party, no more than two of them may normally present argument and their combined speaking time must not exceed the time-limits indicated above. However, representatives other than those who addressed the Court may answer questions from Members of the Court and reply to observations of other representatives.

128. Where two or more parties are advancing the same argument before the Court (a situation which may arise where, in particular, there are interventions or where cases have been joined), their representatives are requested to confer with each other before the hearing in order to avoid any repetition.

129. The Report for the Hearing, drawn up by the Judge-Rapporteur, is confined to setting out the pleas in law and a succinct summary of the parties’ arguments.

130. The Court will make every effort to ensure that the parties’ representatives receive the Report for the Hearing at least three weeks before the hearing. The sole purpose of this document is to prepare the hearing for the oral procedure.

131. If, at the hearing, representatives submit oral observations on the Report for the Hearing, these will be recorded by the Registrar or acting Registrar.

132. The Report for the Hearing shall be made available to the public outside the courtroom on the day of the hearing.

133. When citing a decision of the Court of Justice, the General Court or the Civil Service Tribunal, representatives are requested to refer to it by the usual name of the case and the case-number, and, where relevant, to specify the relevant paragraph(s).

134. The Court will accept documents submitted at the hearing only in exceptional circumstances and only after the parties have been heard in that regard.

135. A request to use particular technical means for the purposes of a presentation must be made in good time. Arrangements for such use of technology should be made with the Registrar, so that any technical or practical constraints can be taken into account.

III. ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THESE PRACTICE DIRECTIONS

137. These Practice Directions shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. They shall enter into force on the day following their publication.

Done at Luxembourg, 24 January 2012. E. COULON Registrar M. JAEGER President

(1) For example, ‘Times New Roman’ 12 font for the main text and ‘Times New Roman’ 10 font for the text of footnotes.

(2) For example, single line spacing, and margins of at least 2,5 cm.

(3) The text must be presented in accordance with the requirements at point 12(c) of these Practice Directions.