‘9.

395 L 0017: Commission Directive 95/17/EC of 19 June 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 76/768/EEC as regards the non-inclusion of one or more ingredients on the list used for the labelling of cosmetic products (OJ L 140, 23.6.1995, p. 26). The provisions of the Directive shall, for the purposes of the present Agreement, be read with the following adaptations (a) The second paragraph of Article 9 shall be replaced by: “(a) Where the decision of the competent authority of an EU Member State is challenged by another EU Member State, the Commission shall take a decision following the procedures referred to in Article 10 of Council Directive 76/768/EEC, and shall inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) of its decision. (b) Where the decision of the competent authority of an EU Member State is challenged by an EFTA State: (i) The EFTA State shall submit its reasoned challenge to the EFTA Surveillance Authority. (ii) Where the ESA finds that the challenge is not justified after examination following procedures established in accordance with Protocol 1, Article 4(d) of this Agreement, it shall take a decision not to transmit the challenge to the Commission, and shall inform the Commission of this decision. (iii) Where the EFTA Surveillance Authority finds that the challenge is justified, it shall transmit it to the Commission. (iv) The Commission shall launch the procedures referred to in Article 10 of Council Directive 76/768/EEC. (v) The Commission shall inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority of its decision. (vi) Where the Commission decides that the challenge is not justified, the ESA may refer the matter to the EEA Joint Committee which shall deal with it in accordance with Article 111 of this Agreement. (c) Where the decision of the competent authority of an EFTA State is challenged by another EFTA State, the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall take a decision in accordance with the procedures established in accordance with Protocol 1, Article 4(d) of this Agreement. It shall inform the Commission of the decision it takes and the Commission shall transmit the decision to the EU Member States. (d) Where the decision of the competent authority of an EFTA State is challenged by an EU Member State: (i) The EU Member State shall submit its reasoned challenge to the Commission. (ii) Where the Commission finds that the challenge is not justified following consultation and the appropriate procedures if necessary, it shall take a decision not to transmit the challenge to the EFTA Surveillance Authority, and shall inform the ESA of this decision. (iii) Where the Commission finds that the challenge is justified, the Commission shall transmit the challenge to the EFTA Surveillance Authority. (iv) The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall take a decision in accordance with the procedures established in accordance with Protocol 1, Article 4(d) of this Agreement. (v) The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall inform the Commission of its decision. (vi) Where the ESA decides that the challenge is not justified, the Commission may refer the matter to the EEA Joint Committee which shall deal with it in accordance with Article 111 of this Agreement.” (b) In the Annex to this Directive (Procedure for granting the registration number referred to in Article 4) the following point shall be inserted after point 2: “3. The following codes are allocated to the EFTA EEA States: 91 Iceland 92 Liechtenstein 93 Norway”.’