1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 1
This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
►B COUNCIL REGULATION (EC)No 2334/97
of 24 November 1997
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of flat pallets of wood originating in
the Republic of Poland and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed
(OJ L 324, 27.11.1997, p. 1)
Amended by:
Official Journal
No page date
►M1Council Regulation (EC) No 2079/98 of 24 September 1998 L 266 1 1.10.1998
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 2
▼B
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC)No 2334/97
of 24 November 1997
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of flat
pallets of wood originating in the Republic of Poland and collecting
definitively the provisional duty imposed
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Havingreg ard to the Treaty establishingthe European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December
1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not membersof the European Community (
1), and in particular Articles 9 (4) and 10
(2) thereof,
Havingreg ard to the proposal presented by the Commission after
consultingthe Advisory Committee,
Whereas:
A.PROVISIONAL MEASURES
(1)The Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 (2) (hereinafter
referred to as the Provisional Regulation) imposed provisionalduties on certain imports into the Community of flat pallets ofwood fallingwithin CN code ex 4415 20 20 and orig inatinginPoland. In addition, undertakings offered by certain exporters inconnection with those imports were accepted by the ProvisionalRegulation. The product scope of these undertakings was limitedto a certain type of flat pallets of wood, i.e. EUR-pallets.
(2)By Regulation (EC) No 1632/97 (3), the Commission amended
the Provisional Regulation by adding a provision wherebygenuine new Polish exporters can be allocated the weightedaverage duty applicable to cooperating companies not included inthe sample of exporters investigated and can have undertakingsaccepted with regard to exports of EUR-pallets.
(3)By Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 (4), pursuant to the abovemen-
tioned new provision, the Commission further amended theProvisional Regulation by including a number of genuine newexporters in the list of companies receiving the weighted averageduty and by acceptingundertaking s from some of these newexporters.
B.SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE
(4)Followingthe imposition of provisional anti-dumpingduties,
several interested parties submitted comments in writing. Theparties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heardby the Commission. The Commission continued to seek andverify all the information it deemed necessary for the purpose ofits definitive findings.
(5)Parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations onthe basis of which it was intended to recommend the impositionof definitive anti-dumpingduties and the definitive collection ofamounts secured by way of provisional subsequent to this disclo-sure.
(1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No
2331/96 (OJ L 317, 6. 12. 1996, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 150, 7. 6. 1997, p. 4.
(3) OJ L 225, 15. 8. 1997, p. 11.
(4) OJ L 225, 15. 8. 1997, p. 13.
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 3
▼B
(6)The comments submitted by the interested parties were duly
examined and, where deemed appropriate, taken into account inmakingthe definitive finding s.
C.PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
(7)Accordingto recitals (8) and (9) of the Provisional Reg ulation
the product under consideration is flat wooden pallets, fallingunder CN code ex 4415 20 20 and originating in Poland.
It appeared that the provisional anti-dumpingduty on wooden
pallets was not applied consistently by the customs authorities.For example, while some customs offices applied the provisionalanti-dumpingduty on used and repaired pallets, others did not. Itwas also reported that the anti-dumpingduty had in some casesbeen applied to pallets when they were loaded with other goodsfor the purpose of importingthese g oods into the Community.
(8)Despite the fact that used and repaired pallets have a similar useand physical characteristics closely resemblingthe productconcerned, i.e. newly produced pallets, the investigation hasshown that newly produced pallets on the one hand and used andrepaired pallets on the other hand differ substantially in terms ofthe perception by potential pallet users and channels throughwhich they are usually sold.
(9)On the basis of the foregoing, it is concluded that used andrepaired pallets cannot be considered to be like products inaccordance with Article 1 (4) of the Basic Regulation and there-fore these pallets are not covered by the scope of the currentinvestigation. It follows that anti-dumping measures should notapply to used and repaired pallets but only to imports of newlyproduced flat wooden pallets originating in Poland.
In addition, as regards flat pallets of wood originating in Poland
which are loaded with other goods for the purpose of importingthese goods into the Community, the Commission is of theopinion that these should be treated as used pallets provided thatthe pallets represent only a minor proportion of the total value ofthe loaded goods imported.
D.DUMPING
1.Normal value
(10)As set out in recital 16 of the Provisional Regulation, in
constructingnormal values for pallets other than the EUR-pallet,the weighted average profit margin relating to domestic salesfound for two investigated companies which had representativeand profitable domestic sales was used for other Polish exportersnot havingmade representative and/or profitable domestic sales,in accordance with Article 2 (6) (a) of the Basic Regulation.
(11)Two of these other Polish exporters claimed that the domesticsales used as a basis for determining this weighted average profitmargin might not be representative due to circumstances whichare specific to the two companies havingmade these sales andwhich might thus have generated exceptionally high profit levels.However, the investigation has shown that the sales used tocalculate the weighted average profit margin have been made insufficient quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, and thatthe resultingprofit marg in can be considered to reasonably reflectthe actual amounts of profit realized on the Polish market.
(12)With regard to the remaining aspects of normal value, in theabsence of any new argument raised by the interested parties, themethodology and the findings as described in recitals 16 to 18 ofthe Provisional Regulation are confirmed.
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 4
▼B
2.Export price
(13)Followingdisclosure of the provisional finding s, two Polish
exporters, for whom export prices have been constructed inaccordance with Article 2 (9) of the Basic Regulation, and theirrelated importer in the Community have claimed that the adjust-ments made for selling, general and administrative (SG& A)expenses and profit were excessive in respect of the amountsactually attributed to the product under investigation.
(14)As regards profits, the Commission has re-examined the issueand has sought additional information and evidence from inde-pendent importers of wooden pallets on profits made in theinvestigation period, i.e. the calendar year 1994 (hereinafterreferred to as the ‘IP'). As a result of this re-examination thefindings made for the purpose of the provisional measures areconfirmed and, therefore, retained as definitive findings.
(15)In the Provisional Regulation, the amount of SG& A expenseswas determined by allocatingthese expenses to the productconcerned on the basis of turnover. This allocation key was usedin the absence of a specific, historically utilized allocation or anyother more appropriate method. The company also agreed to thisapproach duringthe on-the-spot verification. Afterwards theimporter proposed a different allocation of SG& A expensesbased on an estimated apportionment of all cost items to theproduct concerned and other activities of the company. However,given that it has not been shown that the new allocation methodhas been historically used, the claim had to be rejected andpreference given to the allocation of costs on the basis of turn-over, in accordance with Article 2 (5) of the Basic Regulation.
(16)With reg ard to the remainingaspects concerningthe deter-mination of the export price, in the absence of any new argumentraised by the interested parties, the methodology and the findingsas described in recitals 19 to 21 of the Provisional Regulation areconfirmed.
3.Comparison
(17)In the absence of any new argument raised by the interested
parties, the methodology and the findings made with regard to thecomparison between the export price and the normal value asdescribed in recitals 22 to 25 of the Provisional Regulation areconfirmed.
4.Dumping margins
(18)As set out in recital 27 of the Provisional Regulation, a single
dumpingmarg in was allocated to the two Polish exporters whichare both related to the same importer in the Community, in orderto preclude the possibility that future exports to the Communitymight be channelled through the company having the lowermargin. The single dumping margin applicable to both Polishexporters concerned was calculated on the basis of the weightedaverage of the individual dumping margins found for eachcompany.
(19)As a result of the revision of the methodology provisionally usedto weigh the two margins, the definitive single dumping marginto be applied to both companies amounts to 5,9 % instead of6,3 %.
(20)As regards the dumping margins found for the Polish exporters inthe sample, namely the margin applicable to cooperating expor-ters not investigated and the margin applicable to non-cooper-ating exporters not investigated, in the absence of any new argu-ment, the methodology and findings as set out in recitals 26 and28 to 31 of the Provisional Regulation are confirmed.
(21)In view of the above, the definitive dumpingmarg ins are asfollows:
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 5
▼B
1. Investigated companies included in the sample:
— P.P.H.i.U. Eldagran, Slawoborze 4,9 %— Intur-Kfs, Spolka z o.o., Inowroclaw 9,7 %— Z.P.H. Palettenwerk Kazimierz Kozik, Bystra Podha-
lanska4,0 %
— RSP Rzecko, Choszczno 0,0 %
— Sabelmar Import-Export, Konczyce Male 9,8 %— Paletex, Roman Panasiuk, Warszawa 9,8 %— Tor-Pal, Spolka z o.o., Kwidzyn 0,0 %— Z.P.P.D., Zielona Gora 10,6 %.2. Individually treated companies (PPHU Alpa, Spolka
z o.o., Dobrzyca and PPHU Palimex, Spolka z o.o.,Wloszakowice)5,9 %.
3. Cooperatingcompanies not investig ated 6,3 %.
4. Non-cooperatingcompanies 10,6 %.
E.DETERMINATION OF THE COMMUNITY INDUSTRY
(22)
As no new arguments were received in connection with the
definition of the Community industry as set out in recital 32 ofthe Provisional Regulation, the qualification of the complainingindustry as the Community industry for the purposes of thecurrent investigation is confirmed.
F.INJURY
(23)A main submission with regard to injury was received from two
related Polish exporters. They claimed that the Commission onlyanalysed the changes in consumption between the beginning andthe end of the period covered by the examination of injury, thusnot takinginto account the variations which had occurredbetween 1992 and the IP. Accordingto these exporters, the trendsconcerningconsumption and other injury factors such as sales,market share and production, observed between 1992 and the IP,corroborated the fact that the Community industry did not sufferany injury.
(24)As a matter of principle it should be recalled that in anti-dumpinginvestigations the time period on which the analysis and thedetermination of injury is based covers a period of several years.As mentioned in recital 6 of the Provisional Regulation, in theinvestigation at issue this period covered the time from 1 January1991 to the end of the IP, namely 31 December 1994.
As set out in recitals 51 to 53 of the Provisional Regulation,
injury has been assessed and determined in the light of theevidence available for the period coveringthe analysis of injuryby consideringthe development and trends of the various injuryfactors throughout this entire period.
(25)The analysis of injury has shown that dumped imports havecontinuously increased both in absolute terms (+ 87 %) as well asin terms of Community market share (+ 83 %) from 1991 to theIP (1994).
(26)As regards prices, it has been found that Polish pallet pricesdecreased significantly over the above period, i.e. by 26 %.Furthermore, duringthe IP an averag e price undercuttinglevel of14 % was found to exist.
(27)As far as the situation of the Community industry is concerned,the investigation has shown that all the injury factors investigatedand analysed in detail, namely sales, production, capacity utiliza-tion, market share, profitability, price trends and employmenthave continuously deteriorated since 1991.
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 6
▼B
The imports under investigation therefore had a considerableimpact on both the Community market and the Communityindustry. As mentioned in recital 51 of the Provisional Regulationthis conclusion was reached despite the fact that the Communityindustry’s production, capacity utilization and sales improvedfrom 1993 up to the IP due to the fact that this improvement wasonly the result of a recovery of Community consumption back tothe level prevailingin 1991. Other factors, notably the develop-ment of the Community industry’s market shares, prices andprofitability, clearly showed a negative trend which can only beexplained by the existence of the dumped imports. The argumentraised by the Polish exporters could therefore not be accepted.
(28)As there is no concrete or positive evidence which would allowthe modification of the provisional conclusion made by theCommission whereby the Community industry had sufferedmaterial injury within the meaningof Article 3 of the BasicRegulation, this conclusion is confirmed.
G.CAUSATION OF INJURY
(29)As far as the analysis of the causal link between dumpingand
injury is concerned, the abovementioned Polish exporters claimedthat this analysis was not consistently based on data relatingtothe whole Community.
In this respect reference is made to recitals 54 to 69 of the
Provisional Regulation where it was established that a causal linkbetween dumpingand injury existed on a Community-wide level.The Provisional Regulation also pointed out that the aforemen-tioned conclusion had been reinforced and confirmed by a moredetailed and thorough analysis carried out in specific MemberStates referred to as ‘selected markets'in the Provisional Regula-tion. This analysis clearly showed that the claim made by thesetwo exporters could not, therefore, be accepted.
(30)In the absence of any further argument, the findings set out in theProvisional Regulation are confirmed indicating that in accord-ance with Article 3 (6) of the Basic Regulation dumped importshave caused material injury to the Community industry.
H.COMMUNITY INTEREST
(31)As no new arguments were received in connection with the
Community interest analysis made in the Provisional Regulation,the provisional findings are confirmed.
I.ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
(32)Based on the above conclusions on dumping, injury, causal link
and Community interest, it was considered what form and levelof anti-dumpingmeasures would have to be taken in order toremove the trade-distortingeffects of injurious dumpingand torestore effective competitive conditions on the Communitymarket.
(33)Since the level of prices at which the injurious effects of theimports would be removed was higher than the dumping marginsfound in the investigation, the level of the measures should bebased on the dumpingmarg ins.
(34)As already mentioned in recital 2, the Commission has, at theprovisional stage of the investigation, accepted undertakingspursuant to Article 8 of the Basic Regulation in respect of theEUR pallet. Pursuant to these undertakings, the Polish exportershave, inter alia, offered not to sell EUR pallets below a certainminimum price. The undertakings also contain strict monitoringprovisions. Furthermore, it will be recalled that exports of pallettypes other than the EUR pallet made by exporters from which anundertakingwas accepted as well as all other exports of the
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 7
▼B
product concerned to the Community made by other exporters
were subject to a provisional anti-dumpingduty.
(35)It is now definitively confirmed that the combined effect of theundertakings and the anti-dumping duty is considered sufficientto remove the injurious effects of dumping. Since the invest-igation has now been concluded, definitive anti-dumping dutieswill be imposed in case of violation or withdrawal of an under-takingg iven by any exporter. The level of the duty for theEUR-pallet type in case of such breach or violation would be thesame as the duty applicable to imports of other types of pallet.
(36)On the above basis, and, where applicable, in parallel with under-takings accepted, definitive duties, in the form of ad valoremduties, should be imposed.
J.NEW EXPORTERS
(37)As already mentioned in recital 3 above, the Commission, by
Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 amending the Provisional Regula-tion, allocated the weighted average duty imposed on cooperatingexporters not investigated to a number of genuine new exporters.By that Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 the Commission acceptedundertakings with regard to EUR pallets from some of these newexporters, thus exemptingthem from any provisional duty withregard to that type of pallet.
This treatment of genuine new exporters is definitively
confirmed.
(38)In the meantime, the Commission has received further applica-tions from allegedly new exporters. Those applicants whichprovided sufficient evidence showingthat they are g enuine newexporters should be made subject to the weighted average defin-itive duty. Furthermore, the new exporters from which theCommission has accepted an undertakingunder CommissionDecision 97/797/EC (
1) should be exempted from any anti-
dumpingduty with reg ard to that type of pallet.
(39)A provision should be included in this Regulation whereby,through an amendment thereto, any genuine new exporters whomay come forward in the future should be made subject to theweighted average duty and should be exempted from any duty incases where the Commission accepts undertakings from thoseexporters.
K.COLLECTION OF THE PROVISIONAL DUTIES
(40)In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found for the
exportingproducers and in the lig ht of the seriousness of injurycaused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary thatthe amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumpingdutiesshould be definitively collected at the level of the definitiveduties for newly produced flat pallets of wood originating inPoland. Amounts secured in excess of the level of the definitiveduties and amounts secured for repaired, used and loaded palletsshould be released,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
1. A definitive anti-dumpingduty is hereby imposed on imports of
new flat pallets of wood fallingwithin CN code ex 4415 20 20 (Tariccode: 4415 20 20*10), originating in Poland. This duty shall not applyto imports of used and of repaired flat pallets of wood.
(1) See page 36 of this Official Journal.
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 8
▼B
Manufacturer Rate of duty Taric Additional CodeFlat pallets of wood which are loaded with other goods for the purpose
of importingthose g oods into the Community shall be treated as usedpallets provided that the goods in question are the main purpose of theimport and that the pallets represent only a minor proportion of the totalvalue of the goods imported.
2. The rate of definitive anti-dumpingduties applicable to the net,
free-at-Community frontier prices, before duty, shall be as follows:
Zielonogorskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu Drzewnego,
PL-65-950 Zielona Gora 10,6 % 8013
Firma ‘Sabelmar' — Leszek Sabela, PL-43-525 Konc-zyce Male
9,8 % 8014
P.P.H.U. ‘Alpa' Sp. z o.o., PL-76-038 Dobrzyca 5,9 % 8015
P.P.H.U. ‘Palimex'Sp. z o.o., PL-64-140 Wloszakowice 5,9 % 8015
P.W. ‘Intur-KFS' Sp. z o.o., PL-88-100 Inowroclaw 9,7 % 8016
‘Paletex' Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk, PL-01-601Warszawa
9,8 % 8014
Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyji Handlu I UslugS.C. ‘Elda-gran',
Mr M. Zeminski, PL-78-314 Slawoborze
4,9 % 8017
Z.P.H. ‘Palettenwerk' — K. Kozik, PL-34-789 Bystra
Podhalanska 4,0 % 8018
Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjno Handlowe, ‘Tor-Pal'Sp. zo.o., PL-82-500 Kwidzyn
0% 8020
Rolnicza Spoldzielnia Produkcyjna Rzecko, PL-73-200Choszczno
0% 8020
Companies listed in Annex I to this Regulation 6,3 % 8019
Others 10,6 % 8900
3. Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning
customs duties shall apply.
Article 2
NotwithstandingArticle 1, the duties shall not apply to imports of one
specific pallet type, namely the EUR pallet, beinga flat pallet of wood,marked by the registered mark ‘EUR'and the initials of the approvingrailway, manufactured, exported to the Community and invoiced tobuyers established in the Community by the companies listed in AnnexII to this Regulation in respect of which undertakings have beenaccepted by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 and CommissionDecision 97/797/EC.
Article 3
The amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumpingduty under
Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 shall be definitively collected at the dutyrates definitively imposed. Amounts secured in excess of the definitiverate of anti-dumpingduty and amounts secured for repaired, used andloaded pallets shall be released.
Article 4
1. Where any party provides sufficient evidence to the Commission
that:
— it did not export to the Community or produce the goods described
in Article 1 (1) duringthe investig ation period,
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 9
▼B
— it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in the exporting
country which are subject to the anti-dumpingduties imposed bythis Regulation,
— it has actually exported to the Community the goods concerned after
the investigation period, or it has entered into an irrevocablecontractual obligation to export a significant quantity to theCommunity,
then the Council, actingby simple majority on a proposal submitted by
the Commission after consultingthe Advisory Committee, may amendthis Regulation by adding that party to the list of companies in Annex I.
2. Where the Commission accepts undertakings with regard to the
EUR pallet from any party mentioned in paragraph 1 with regard to theEUR pallet, the Council, actingby simple majority on a proposalsubmitted by the Commission after consultingthe Advisory Committee,may amend this Regulation by adding that party to the list of companiesin Annex II.
Article 5
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its
publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities .
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in
all Member States.
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 10
▼M1
ANNEX I
Manufacturer
1. ‘Baum-Holz' Sp.zo.o., Olsztyn
2. ‘DAST' GmbH, Poznan3. Drew-Pol Export-Import, Wodarz Norbert, Murow4. E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S.C., Snietnica5. F.P.H. ‘Tina', Katowice6. F.P.H. Tadeusz Fischer, Maly Gleboczek7. F.P.U.H. ‘Rol-Mar', Adam Piatek, Klodzko8. Z.P.H.U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa9. Internationale Paletten Company Sp., Lebork
10. ‘Kross-Pol' Sp.zo.o., Kolobrzeg11. P.P.U.H. ‘Drewmax' Sp.zo.o. (formerly P.P.H. ‘Drewnex'), Krakow12. P.P.H. ‘GKT' S.C., Majdan Mowy13. P.P.H. ‘Pamadex', Ligota14. P.P.H. ‘Unikat', Aleksandrow IV 69715. P.P.H.U. ‘Adapol' S.C., Wolomin16. P.P.U.H. ‘Alwa' Sp.zo.o., Tychowo17. P.P.U.H. ‘SMS' — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno18. P.T.H. ‘Mirex', Kolobrzeg19. P.W. ‘Peteco' Sp.zo.o., Warszawa20. Parafia Rzymsko-Katolicka, B. NiepokalanegDzialalnose Gospodaroza,
Nowy Sacz
21. Produkcja Palet ‘A. Adamus', Kuznia Grabowska22. Produkcja Skup Palet Drewnanych, Stanislaw Lachowicz, Majdan
Sieniawski 170
23. Przedsiebiorstwo ‘Amesko', Andrzej Skora, Trzebnica24. P.H.U. ‘Justyna', Gubin25. P.H.U. ‘Akropol', Krakow26. P.H.U. Produkcyjne ‘Lech', Lech Szwez, Zary27. Przedsiebiorstwo Obrobki Drewna ‘Palet-Pol' Sp.zo.o., Dabrowka WLKP28. P.P.H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal29. P.P.H.U. ‘AWA' Sp.zo.o., Nowy Sacz30. Przedsiebiorstwo Wielobranzowe, Zdziolaw Milocki, Ostroda31. ‘Scanproduct' SA., Czarny Dunajec32. SC ‘Bed', Dariusz Zuk, Krasienin33. S.U.T.R. ‘Rol Trak', Prochowice34. Stolarstwo Export-Import, Tadeusz Swirski, Dlugopole Zdroj35. Torunskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu Drzewnego w Toruniu, Adam
Wisniewski, Torun
36. ‘Transdrewneks' Sp.zo.o., Grudziadz-Owczarki37. W.Z.P.U.M. ‘Euro-Tech', Rakszawa38. Wytwazanie Skrzyn i Opakowan Drewnianych, Malgorzata i Ryszard
Nowak, Piaszyna
39. Zaklad Produkcyjno Bohuszko, Ryszard Bohuszko, Osno40. Z.P.H. ‘Maw' SC., Andrzej Kulej, Lubomierz41. Zaklad Uslugowo-Handlowy ‘Rolmex', E. Cackowski, Lipno42. Zaklad Wielobranzowy Produkcyjno Uslugowy, Ryszard Potoniec, Muszyna43. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S.C., Drawsko Pomorskie44. Z.P.H.U. ‘Drewex' S.C., Asnieszka Pawlaczyk, Skwierzyna45. Z.P.H.U. ‘Sek-Pol' Sp.zo.o., Tarnobrzeg46. ‘Euro-Mega-Plus' Sp.zo.o., Kielce47. ‘C.M.C.', Sp.zo.o., Andrychow
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 11
▼M1
48. Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV 704
49. Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gierka, Brodnica50. Z.P.H.U. ‘Drewnex' S.C., Zelazkow 45 b51. Import-Export ‘Elko' Sp.zo.o., Kalisz52. P.P.H.U. ‘Probox', Import-Export, Kalisz53. Drewpal S.C., Stawiszyn54. Zaman S.C., Radom55. ‘Marimpex', Pulawy56. ‘AVEN' Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn57. P.P.H.U. ‘Eurex' S.C., Godynice58. P.H. ‘Drewex' S.C., Lebork59. MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko60. ENKEL S.C., Pulawy61. PAL-PACK Sp.zo.o., Wierzchowo62. Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W.i.T. HENSOLDT,
Lebork
63. Biuro Uslugowo-Handlowe, Wieslaw Rzezniczek, Lebork64. P.P.U.H. ‘DREWPOL', Braszewice65. PTN Kruklanki Sp.zo.o., Kruklanki66. WEDAM S.C., Stezyca67. Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow68. Zaklad Produkcyjny ‘Tarta', Lubsko69. Firma ‘Krausdrew', Cewice70. ‘Lidal' S.C., Miastko71. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna Import-Export, Stanislaw Kociolek, Ladek Zdroj72. P.P.H.U. ‘Alk', Bierzwnik73. ‘Empol' S.C., Jastrzebniki 3774. Zaklad Producji Drzewnej Nr. 1, Export-Import, Julian Bartkowski, Sanok75. P.P.H. ‘Drewex', Czarnkow76. ‘ZAP' Przedsiebiorstwo Handlowe-Uslugowe Sp.C, Wschowa77. P.P.H.U. ‘Opal', Zygmunt Podgorski, Bukowsko 4178. ‘Algepa-Pol', Sp.zo.o., Lubsko79. P.P.H. ‘A-Produkt' S.C., Resko80. PPH ‘Paletex' Sibinski Jaroslaw, Klonowa81. Euro-Handels Sp.zo.o., Szczecin82. Firma ‘KIKO' S.C., Poznan83. ‘Enkel' Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy84. Sliwka Lucyna, Klodzko85. Firma Borkowski S.C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna86. Produkcja — Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow87. ‘Prodpalet' Handel, Boleslawiec88. Z.P.H.U. ‘Drexport' S.C., Olecko, Osiedle Lesk89. ‘Bilusa' Sp.zo.o, Klodawa90. Pawel Bilko ‘Pablo', Klodawa91. ZPW ‘Gober' Sp.zo.o., Gorzow Wlkp.92. Kisiel Malgorzata ‘Drew-Pal', Dobra Now93. P.W. ‘Remag', Zlocieniec94. PPUH PAL-POL S.C., Prabuty95. Firma ‘A.C.S.' S.C., Kamien96. Zaklad Produkcji Skrzyn i Opakowan Drewnianych Szuta Marian, Kawcze
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 12
▼M1
ManufacturerTaric additional
codeANNEX II
1. ‘Baum-Holz'Sp.zo.o., Olsztyn 8570
2. E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S.C., Snietnica 8571
3. F.P.H. ‘Tina'S.C., Katowice 8572
4. Firma ‘Sabelmar'S.C., Konczyce Male 8573
5. Z.P.H.U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa 8574
6. Internationale Paletten Company Sp., Lebork 8575
7. ‘Kross-Pol'Sp.zo.o., Kolobrzeg 8576
8. P.P.U.H. ‘Drewmax'Sp.zo.o. (formerly P.P.H. ‘Drewnex'),Krakow 8577
9. P.P.H. ‘GKT'SC., Majdan Nowy 8584
10. P.P.H. ‘Pamadex',Ligota 8585
11. P.P.H. ‘Unikat',Aleksandrow IV 697 8586
12. P.P.H.U. ‘Adapol'SC., Wolomin 8587
13. P.P.H.U. ‘Alpa'Sp.zo.o., Dobrzyca 8588
14. P.P.U.H. ‘Alwa'Sp.zo.o., Tychowo 8589
15. P.P.H.U. ‘Palimex'Sp.zo.o., Wloszakowice 8590
16. P.P.U.H. ‘SMS'— St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno 8591
17. P.T.H. ‘Mirex',Kolobrzeg 8597
18. P.W. ‘Intur-KFS'Sp.zo.o., Inowroclaw 8662
19. P.W. ‘Peteco'Sp.zo.o., Warszawa 8690
20. ‘Paletex'Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk, Warszawa 8691
21. Produkcja Palet ‘A. Adamus',Kuznia Grabowska 8692
22. P.H.U. ‘Akropol',Krakow 8713
23. P.P.H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal 8693
24. ‘Scanproduct'SA., Czarny Dunajec 8715
25. S.U.T.R. ‘Rol Trak',Prochowice 8714
26. ‘Transdrewneks'Sp.zo.o., Grudziadz-Owczarki 8716
27. W.Z.P.U.M. ‘Euro-Tech',Rakszawa 8725
28. Z.P.H. ‘Palettenwerk'— K. Kozik, Bystra Podhalanska 8726
29. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S.C., Drawsko Pomorskie 8745
30. Z.P.H.U. ‘Sek-Pol'Sp.zo.o., Tarnobrzeg 8526
31. ‘Euro-Mega-Plus'Sp.zo.o., Kielce 8527
32. ‘C.M.C.'Sp.zo.o., Krakow 8528
33. Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV 704 8529
34. Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gierka, Brodnica 8530
35. Z.P.H.U. ‘Drewnex'S.C., Zelazkow 45 b 8531
1997R2334 — EN — 02.10.1998 — 001.001 — 13
▼M1
ManufacturerTaric additional
code
36. Import-Export ‘Elko'Sp.zo.o., Kalisz 8532
37. P.P.H.U. ‘Probox',Import-Export, Kalisz 8533
38. Drewpal S.C., Stawiszyn 8534
39. Zaman S.C., Radom 8535
40. ‘Marimpex',Pulawy 8537
41. ‘AVEN'Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn 8558
42. P.P.H.U. ‘Eurex'S.C., Godynice 8538
43. MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko 8539
44. ENKEL S.C., Pulawy 8540
45. Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W.i.T. HENSOLDT, Lebork 8541
46. P.P.U.H. ‘DREWPOL',Braszewice 8834
47. PTN Kruklanki Sp.zo.o., Kruklanki 8556
48. WEDAM S.C., Stezyca 8557
49. Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow 8559
50. P.P.H.U. ‘Alk',Bierzwnik 8561
51. ‘Empol'S.C., Jastrzebniki 37 8560
52. Euro-Handels Sp.zo.o., Szczecin 8440
53. PPH ‘Paletex'Sibinski Jarosklaw, Klonowa 8441
54. Firma ‘KIKO'S.C., Poznan 8443
55. ‘Enkel'Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy 8444
56. Sliwka Lucyna, Klodzko 8445
57. Firma Borkowski S.C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna 8446
58. Produkcja — Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow 8483
59. ‘Bilusa'Sp.zo.o., Klodawa 8484
60. PPUH PAL-POL C.S., Prabuty 8485
61. Firma ‘A.C.S.'S.C., Kamien 8486