2008R0555 — EN — 10.06.2014 — 010.001

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Amended by:





Corrected by:









▼B

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 555/2008

of 27 June 2008

laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 on the common organisation of the market in wine as regards support programmes, trade with third countries, production potential and on controls in the wine sector







THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 of 29 April 2008 on the common organisation of the market in wine, amending Regulations (EC) No 1493/1999, (EC) No 1782/2003, (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 3/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2392/86 and (EC) No 1493/1999 ( 1 ), and in particular Articles 22, 84, 89, 97, 107, 117, 121(b) and (c) thereof, Whereas: (1) Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 has modified the previous regime for the wine sector as laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine ( 2 ) and has repealed that Regulation as from 1 August 2008. (2) The existing implementing rules covering the wine sector are contained in several regulations which have been amended frequently. These implementing rules as regards market mechanisms, trade with third countries, production potential and controls in the wine sector need to be changed as a result of the modifications made to the wine regime by Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, as well as in the light of experience. Detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 should be adopted. (3) The following Commission Regulations should therefore be repealed and replaced by a new Regulation: — (EC) No 1227/2000 of 31 May 2000 laying down details rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine, as regards production potential ( 3 ), — (EC) No 1623/2000 of 25 July 2000 laying down detailed rules Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine with regard to market mechanisms ( 4 ), — (EC) No 2729/2000 of 14 December 2000 laying down detailed implementing rules on controls in the wine sector ( 5 ), — (EC) No 883/2001 of 24 April 2001 laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards trade with third countries in products in the wine sector ( 6 ). (4) Title II of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 contains provisions on a new support programme to be decided at Member States level to finance specific support measures to assist the wine sector. It is appropriate to fill out that framework by enacting implementing rules. (5) There should be a procedure for the first submission of the support programme. There should be as well a procedure for annually amending support programmes for the following year, so that they can be adjusted to take account of any new conditions which could not have been foreseen when they were initially presented. All such changes should be subject to certain limits and conditions to ensure the approved support programmes maintain their overall objectives. (6) By virtue of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, Member States may choose to draw up the support programmes at the geographic level deemed most appropriate. Since Member States are responsible for the approval of plans, they should in this case lay down rules on the submission and approval of plans and the minimum content of the plans concerned. (7) Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a new support measure for promotion on third-country markets. It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning the setting up of this new measure. (8) In order to prevent any risk of distortion of competition, rules should be drawn up on the way the specific origin of products covered by information and promotion campaigns is to be referred to. (9) In the interests of legal certainty, the messages disseminated under the promotion campaign should comply with the legislation of the third countries targeted. (10) Criteria governing the selection of applications and their scrutiny by the Member States should be established with a view to ensuring that the Community rules are complied with and that the supported measures to be implemented are effective. (11) With a view to ensuring that the Community measures are effective, the Member States must ensure that the promotion campaign approved are consistent with, and complement, their national and regional promotion programmes. In order to build synergies, Member States may draw up collective promotion campaign and provision should be made to allow cooperation between the Member States concerned. Preference should be given to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises who are more in need of Community support than bigger ones. (12) To avoid any double payment with the promotion measures funded under Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 of 17 December 2007 on information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products on the internal market and in third countries ( 7 ) or Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) ( 8 ), mutual exclusion should be set. (13) Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a support measure for restructuring and conversion of vineyards. In particular, the second subparagraph of Article 11(3) of that Regulation provides that the support for the restructuring and conversion of vineyards shall not cover the normal renewal of vineyards which have come to the end of their natural life. (14) In addition, Member States may adopt rules on the minimum size of the parcel involved so as to ensure that the system has a genuine effect on production potential. (15) In applying Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, Member States have a wide margin of discretion in deciding on the detailed scope and levels of support, including notably the payment of flat-rate amounts, the setting of maximum levels of support per hectare and the modulation of support on the basis of objective criteria, within the constraints laid down in Chapter I of Title II of that Regulation and the provisions adopted in pursuance thereof. Nevertheless, common rules should be laid down. Measures should be defined, with time limits, for their execution and appropriate monitoring. The rules should also cover the use of replanting rights which arise from grubbing-up if provided for in the project, so as to allow for higher levels of support to be granted on account of the higher costs involved. (16) In the interest of verification, payment of the support should normally be made after a specific measure or the complete set of measures, has been executed. However, payment may be made in advance of execution of a measure or the complete set of measures, provided that a security is lodged to ensure that execution of the measure takes place. (17) Detailed provisions should be established as to participation in the financing of the system for restructuring and conversion. Measures have to be taken to ensure the effective spending of funds reserved for the system, provision being made in particular for advance payments. (18) Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a new support measure for green harvesting. In view of subsidiarity, Member States should be made responsible for the administrative arrangements concerning the application procedure for green harvesting. They should be free to determine the date until which they request producers to complete the operations, so as to have sufficient time, in view of the time constraints and proximity of harvesting period, for the necessary control before payments. (19) Taking into account the funds involved in the green harvesting scheme, systematic on-the-spot verification of the areas concerned should be foreseen after the execution. This verification must ensure that total destruction of grapes has been carried out. They should also ensure that phytosanitary and environmental requirements are duly respected. In the interests of verification, payment of the premium should be made after having controlled that green harvesting took place. (20) In addition, maximum levels of support should be fixed in order to ensure that support does not become a permanent alternative outlet for products compared to placing them on the market. (21) Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a new support measure for the setting-up of mutual funds. It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning this new measure. As far as possible these rules should provide for flexibility and for rapid application in crises and therefore should allow decisions to be taken by Member States and producer organisations themselves. Nevertheless the rules should prevent abuses and provide for limits, including in financial terms. As producers in the new Member States have in general a lower degree of organisation than in other Member States, a higher ceiling of support should be provided in the former. (22) Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a new support measure for harvest insurance. It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning the setting up of this new measure. As far as possible these rules should provide for flexibility. Nevertheless the rules should prevent abuses and provide for limits, including in financial terms. (23) Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a new support measure for tangible and intangible investments in enterprises. It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning the setting up of this new measure in coherence with the same measure available in the Rural Development menu. The types of eligible investments should be set out, including those for the development of new products, processes and technologies, indicative eligible costs should be defined. (24) Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a support measure for by-product distillation. It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning the setting up of this new measure in particular conditions of disposal of by-products as well as the purpose and the level of the maximum amount of the aid for distillation of marcs, wine and lees. (25) Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a transitional support measure for potable alcohol distillation. It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning the setting up of this new measure in particular the purpose and the possible adjustments of the aid. (26) Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a transitional support measure for crisis distillation. It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning the setting up of this measure in particular the procedure and the modalities of the aid as well as criteria to be taken into account when fixing the amount of the aid. (27) Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for a transitional support measure for must utilisation for enrichment. It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning the setting up of this measure in particular the purpose and the level of the maximum amount of the aid as well as to provide for specific checks to be done on the product used to increase the alcoholic strength. (28) It is imperative, for the purpose of monitoring the implementation of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 and of the proper management of the market, that the Commission has the appropriate data available as to the execution of the support programmes. In this context, it is necessary to lay down the details of the information to be set out on the reporting and evaluation of support programmes in order to assess their effectiveness and efficiency. (29) The general rules concerning budgetary discipline, and in particular those relating to incomplete or incorrect declarations on the part of Member States, should apply in addition to the specific rules established by this Regulation. (30) Details of the financial administration of the system should be governed by the rules adopted for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy ( 9 ). (31) Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 lays down that, for juices and musts for which the application of customs duties depends on the import price of the product, the actual amount of this price is verified either by checking every consignment or by using a flat-rate import value. The current features of the arrangements for importing grape juices and musts into the Community, in particular the irregularity of such imports, in terms of both volume and frequency and the places of import and the origin of these products, do not permit the calculation of representative flat-rate import values to reflect the actual amount of the import price. Under these circumstances, this price should be verified by checking every consignment. (32) The import price on the basis of which imported products are classed in the Common Customs Tariff should be equal to the fob price of those products plus the cost of insurance and transport to the place of entry into Community customs territory. (33) Article 82(3) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides that the imported products covered by that Article should be accompanied by a certificate and an analysis report issued by a body or service designated by the third country from which the products are exported. The requirements which the analysis report should meet should be laid down. (34) To simplify controls provision should be made for dispensing with the certificate and analysis report in the case of products which are imported from third countries in limited quantities and packed in small containers. (35) For the sake of harmonisation, the exemption from the requirement to present a certificate and analysis report for wine products being imported into the Community should be in line with the customs rules on exemption and the arrangements applicable to documents accompanying consignments of wine products within the Community. (36) The use of computerised procedures is gradually replacing the manual input of data in the different areas of administrative activity. It should therefore also be possible to use computerised and electronic procedures when issuing and using V I 1 and V I 2. (37) Some third countries, having established an effective system for inspecting their wine producers, implemented by their bodies or services, referred to in Article 82(3) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, have expressed an interest in the possibility of authorising the producers themselves to issue certificates and analysis reports. With a view to facilitating trade with those third countries, provided that they have concluded undertakings with the Community which include clauses concerning closer cooperation on the prevention of fraud and that they maintain good trade relations with the Community, it is appropriate to authorise those concerned to consider documents issued by the producers themselves as documents issued by the said bodies or services of the third countries, in a manner similar to that already allowed for wines of Community origin. In those cases, appropriate assurances should be given and proper control over the issue of such documents should be exerted. (38) Lists containing the names and addresses of the agencies and laboratories authorised in third countries to draw up certificates and analysis reports should be made public so that the authorities in the Community which supervise the import of wine products can, where necessary, carry out the requisite checks. (39) In order to facilitate controls by the competent authorities of Member States, the form and, where necessary, the content of the certificate and analysis report provided for, and the requirements for their use should be laid down. (40) The certificate and, where appropriate, the analysis report relating to each consignment of an imported product should be checked in order to prevent fraud. To this end, the document(s) must accompany each consignment until it is placed under Community control. (41) To take commercial practice into account, where a consignment of wine is split up, the competent authorities should be empowered to have extracts of the certificate and the analysis report drawn up under their supervision to accompany each new consignment resulting from the splitting. (42) In view of the need to ensure swift and effective protection of consumers, it is essential to provide for the possibility of suspending the new arrangements in the event of fraud or a health risk to consumers. (43) Simple rules should also be laid down regarding the documents to be produced for imports from a third country other than the country of origin of the wine product, where that product has not undergone substantial processing. (44) The task of the exporters and the authorities should be simplified by requiring a statement that the alcohol added to liqueur wines and wines fortified for distillation is of vinous origin to be included in the V I 1 document without requiring a separate document for this statement. For the same reason, the V I 1 document should be permitted to serve as the certificate testifying to the designation of origin required for imports of wines eligible for a tariff reduction. However, no certificate or analysis report is required in the case of some wines, provided a certificate of designation of origin is presented. It should be permitted to use the V I 1 document to certify the designation of origin of the said liqueur wines and the section relating to the analysis report need not be completed. (45) Wine imports under concessions provided for in agreements with certain third countries are subject to the presentation of attestations, issued by official bodies or bodies officially recognised by both contracting parties and appearing on lists drawn up jointly, to the effect that the wine in question meets the conditions for access to the concessions. (46) The Member States should send the Commission the lists of official or officially recognised bodies that they propose should issue such attestations, so that the Commission can draw up and exchange those lists with the third countries concerned. To facilitate the tasks of such bodies, the lists should be provided in a suitable form and on a suitable medium. (47) Articles 85 and 86 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provide for the treatment of unlawful plantings. It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning the penalties applicable to producers who do not comply with the new regularisation or grubbing-up obligation concerning vineyards planted without a corresponding planting right before 1 September 1998 and the communications to be transmitted by Member States to the Commission in this context. Without prejudice to earlier penalties imposed by the Member States, the penalty applicable in case of failure to comply with the obligation to grub up the unlawful area should be sufficiently high so as to incite producers to comply with the obligation. Therefore, the penalty should be at least the equivalent of twice the average value of the grubbing-up premium. (48) Article 87(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 foresees that proofs of non-circulation should be required whenever products of an unlawful vineyard may be put into circulation only for the purpose of distillation. In order to strengthen control, the possible ways of non-circulation should be limited to three cases, namely to delivery for distillation or green harvesting at the expense of the producer concerned or family consumption, if the total vineyard area of a producer does not exceed 0.1 hectare. It is appropriate to fix a deadline for the submission of the distillation contracts foreseen in that Article. To be able to effectively organise control, producers carrying out green harvesting should inform the competent authorities about their intention in due time. In the interest of better controllability, Member States should have the possibility to foresee obligatory advance notification from the part of the producers as to which of the three ways of non-circulation they intend to use and also to further limit the choices of the producers concerning the possible ways of non-circulation. (49) To ensure fair and controllable use of Community budget, penalties with financial consequences should be foreseen in case Member States do not comply with communication obligations related to unlawful plantings. (50) Article 91(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for the grant of new planting rights in the case of measures for land consolidation or measures concerning compulsory purchase in the public interest. These new planting rights should not exceed those necessary to plant an area equivalent to 105 % of that lost to producers as a result of those measures, so as to avoid undermining the prohibition on planting contained in Article 90(1) of that Regulation. (51) Article 91(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 also provides for the grant of new planting rights in the case of experiments and graft nurseries. The areas planted in pursuance of such grants of new planting rights should only be used for the specified purposes, and wine-sector products made from grapes coming from such areas should not be marketed. Existing wine-growing experiments and graft nurseries should be allowed to continue, subject to the existing rules. (52) Article 91(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 also provides for the grant of new planting rights in the case of areas whose wine or vine products are intended solely for the consumption of the vine grower’s family. However, this could sometimes lead to an excessive administrative burden being imposed due to the large number of such cases in certain Member States. Accordingly, Member States should be permitted to also allow such areas to exist even if no planting rights have been granted in respect of them, provided that, in order to prevent disturbance of the market balance, the areas concerned are small and that the vine grower is not engaged in commercial wine production. The areas and producers concerned should be subject to appropriate monitoring and sanctions, including the grubbing up of such areas, in cases where the provisions are not observed. (53) No replanting rights should be granted in respect of areas which have been compulsorily grubbed up owing to a breach of the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008. To the same end, no replanting rights should be granted in respect of the grubbing-up of areas for which new planting rights have been granted for purposes other than the commercial production of wine. (54) Article 92(2) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for the grant of replanting rights to producers who undertake to grub up an area of vines in the future. Such a grant should only be made if the producer concerned does not possess sufficient planting rights to plant an area corresponding to the surface he intends to grub up. Any such grant of replanting rights on the basis of such an undertaking should be accompanied by the lodging of a security to ensure that the undertaking to grub up is carried out. During the period of coexistence of the newly planted area and the area to be grubbed up, in order to avoid disturbance of market balance, only one such area should be permitted to produce wine to be marketed. (55) Article 93 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for the creation or maintenance of national and/or regional reserves in order to improve the management of production potential. In order to avoid disturbance of the market balance, the transfer of rights via a reserve system should not lead to an overall increase in production potential on the territory of the Member States. A similar prohibition of increasing the production potential has already been provided for in the case of transfer of rights between holdings in Article 92(5) of that Regulation. In these situations, Member States may apply a reduction coefficient in respect of transfers of rights. (56) Article 93(5) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides that Member States are not to implement the reserve system if they can show that an effective system for managing planting rights exists throughout their territory. In this situation a Member State may provide for the implementation of the reserve system in parts of its territory and another effective system in other parts of its territory. Member States wishing to use the option under that Article should be able to prove that such a system exists and to demonstrate the need for any derogation from the provisions of Chapter I of Title V of that Regulation. (57) Article 90(6) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides that Member States may decide to maintain the prohibition of planting of vines of wine grape varieties until 31 December 2018 at the latest. It is appropriate to foresee that Member States intending to avail themselves of this possibility communicate this to the Commission in due time. (58) Article 100 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 foresees that grubbing-up premium may only be granted to areas which are tended. To enable authorities to verify whether an area is properly tended, beyond the obligatory on-the-spot checks, proofs about the production of the given vineyard should be foreseen. This should be done through the presentation of harvest declarations of the preceding years, or, if the harvest declaration is not available due to well justifiable reasons, by other means foreseen by the Member States for this purpose, the trustworthiness of which has to be thoroughly verified by the Member States. (59) According to Article 104(4) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, Member States may exempt mountain or steep slope areas from the grubbing-up scheme. This exemption should cover terraces established for reasons of steepness of the slope which would make cultivation without terraces too difficult or would lead to serious erosion problems. It is appropriate to lay down criteria for areas that may be subject to such exclusions, based on generally accepted professional standards. Furthermore, according to Article 104(5) and (6) of that Regulation, Member States may also exempt areas based on environmental concerns and Greece may exempt areas planted with vines on the Aegean islands and the Greek Ionian islands, with the exception of Crete and Eubia. These exemptions should be well founded and regularly communicated to the Commission. (60) In view of the experience gained under the application of the former permanent abandonment measure, the system of the scales of the premium should be retained. The new scales of the grubbing-up premium are related to the scales of the premium valid under the scheme before the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, by adding +20 % to them in 2009, +10 % in 2010 and 0 % in 2011. (61) In view of subsidiarity, Member States should be made responsible for the administrative arrangements concerning the application procedure for the grubbing-up premium. They should be free to determine the date until which they request producers to complete the grubbing-up measure, so as to have sufficient time for the necessary control before payments, which have to take place by 15 October. (62) In order to allow for efficient use of the funds reserved for the grubbing-up measure, Member States should foresee a system that permits verification whether the applications for the premium are well founded, including, if appropriate, a written undertaking to be made by the producer and the obligation to bear the costs incurred concerning the treatment of its request in case the application is withdrawn without duly justified reason. (63) In the interests of verification, payment of the premium should be made only once grubbing up has been carried out. (64) Article 104(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for the possibility for Member States to reject any further application of the grubbing-up scheme on its territory or in a given region if the accumulated grubbing-up area reaches 8 % or 10 %, respectively. It is appropriate to request Member States to communicate such a decision to the Commission. (65) It is imperative, for the purpose of monitoring the implementation of Title II and V of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 and the proper management of the market, that the Commission receives the appropriate data as to production potential. In this context, it is necessary to lay down the details of the information to be set out in the inventory referred to in Article 109 of that Regulation. (66) To create a more uniform basis for payments of the support of restructuring and conversion of vineyards, the green harvesting and the grubbing-up premium, it is appropriate to define, on Community level, rules on the measurement of areas, namely to determine what corresponds to the area planted with vines. (67) Measures should be laid down for the checks necessary in order to ensure proper application of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 and of this Regulation, and the appropriate sanctions applicable to irregularities found. Those measures should involve both specific checks and sanctions laid down at the Community level as well as additional national checks and sanctions. The checks and sanctions should be dissuasive, effective and proportionate. (68) Any control related to the production potential should be based primarily on the vineyard register. (69) Taking into account the importance of controlling the production potential and the funds involved in the grubbing-up scheme, systematic on-the spot verification of the areas concerned should be foreseen both before and after the execution of the grubbing-up. However, for Member States disposing of a reliable graphical tool and updated information about the area concerned, it should be possible to do the control before the grubbing-up administratively. As for the control after grubbing-up, remote sensing can be used to verify that vines have actually been grubbed up and therefore its use should be permitted for this (ex post) stage of control. In view of the difficulties in calculating area through remote sensing, this method should be authorised only in cases of grubbing up of entire vineyard parcels or if the resolution of the remote sensing is equal or better than 1 m2. In any case, at least either the control before or the one after the grubbing up should be carried out actually on the spot. (70) For the purpose of the uniform application of wine-sector provisions, rules should be adopted with the aim of specifying the control procedures already in force at national and Community level, on the one hand, and ensuring direct collaboration between the bodies responsible for wine-sector controls, on the other. (71) There should be rules governing the way in which the national bodies and the Commission assist each other in ensuring the correct application of wine-sector rules. Such rules should not hinder the application of specific provisions on Community expenditure, on criminal matters or on national administrative penalties. (72) Member States should ensure the effectiveness of the work of the bodies responsible for wine-sector controls. To that end, they should designate a body responsible for liaison between them and with the Commission. It is also vital that control operations are coordinated between the competent bodies in all Member States where wine-sector controls have been split up between several competent bodies. (73) To help the uniform application of the rules throughout the Community, Member States should take the necessary steps to ensure that the staff of the competent bodies has adequate powers of investigation to guarantee compliance with the rules. (74) The interdependence of wine-sector markets is reflected in the evolution of trade between Member States, in particular the constant increase in the number of international companies active in the sector, and the possibilities offered by the sector's management rules to have operations, whether aided or not, carried out in or transferred to, a location other than that from which the product originates. Such a situation calls for a greater harmonisation of control methods and closer collaboration between the various bodies responsible for controls. (75) For the purpose of effective collaboration between the Member States in applying wine-sector rules, Member States’ competent bodies should be able on request to liaise with competent bodies in another Member State. The rules governing that liaison and assistance must be drawn up. (76) In view of the complex nature of certain matters and the urgent need to settle them, it is vital that a competent body requesting assistance can, in agreement with the other competent body, have authorised agents designated by it present when investigations are carried out. (77) In the event of a serious risk of fraud or of fraud affecting one or several Member States, the various bodies concerned must be able to implement automatically an unsolicited assistance procedure. (78) In view of the nature of the information exchanged under this Regulation, it should be covered by professional confidentiality. (79) Regulation (EC) No 2729/2000 establishes an analysis databank at the Joint Research Centre (JRC) for the purpose of contributing to the harmonisation of analytical controls throughout the Community and bringing together analysis samples and reports from Member States. (80) The use of reference isotopic analysis methods will ensure more effective control of wine product enrichment or the discovery of the addition of water to such products or, used with the results of the analysis of other isotopic characteristics of such products, it will help to verify conformity with the origin indicated in their name. With a view to making interpretation of the results of such analysis easier, it should be possible to compare those results with results obtained previously using the same methods during the analysis of products with similar characteristics and authenticated origin and production. (81) Isotopic analysis of wine or wine-derived products is carried out using the reference analytical methods referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008. (82) In order to facilitate interpretation of the results obtained from such analyses carried out in Community laboratories equipped for the purpose and to guarantee that the results obtained in such laboratories are comparable, uniform rules should be drawn up for taking grape samples and for the vinification and storage of such samples. (83) To guarantee the quality and comparability of analytical data, a system of recognised quality standards should be applied to the laboratories designated by Member States to carry out the isotopic analysis of samples for the databank. (84) Isotopic analysis is an analytical method used for the control and for combating fraud in the wine sector requiring highly special scientific knowledge and technical equipment. Most of the Member States that acceded to the Community in 2004 or 2007 are not equipped to carry out this method. In order to ensure a uniform application of control procedures, the Joint Research Centre should carry out the analysis for those Member States for a period until they are fully equipped and competent to execute the task. (85) Isotopic analysis of wine-sector products and interpretation of the results are delicate procedures and, in order to permit uniform interpretation of such analysis results, the JRC databank should be made accessible to official laboratories using that analytical method and, on request, to other official bodies in the Member States while respecting the principles of the protection of private data. (86) Regulation (EC) No 2729/2000 contains rules on the taking of samples for dispatch to an official laboratory in another Member State and common rules for the taking of samples which are to be analysed by isotopic methods. Those rules should be taken over and the taking of samples for the Community databank should be deemed to be an instance of the taking of samples of a wine-sector product as part of the system of direct liaison between bodies. (87) To guarantee the objective nature of the controls, the officials of a Member State's competent body should be able to ask the competent body in another Member State to carry out sampling. The requesting official should have access to the samples taken and be able to specify the laboratory where they are to be analysed. (88) Detailed rules should be drawn up for the official taking of samples as part of the collaboration between Member States’ competent bodies and for the use of such samples. Such rules should guarantee representativeness and the possibility of verifying the results of official analyses throughout the Community. (89) To simplify the administration of expenditure relating to the taking and dispatch of samples, analysis and organoleptic testing and employing the services of an expert, the principle should be established that such expenditure is to be borne by the body ordering the sampling or the services of the expert. (90) The conclusive force of the findings from controls carried out pursuant to this Regulation should be specified. (91) To guarantee the smooth operation of controls and grape sampling in vineyards provisions should be adopted to prevent interested parties from obstructing controls concerning them and to oblige them to facilitate sampling and provide the information required pursuant to this Regulation. (92) Provisions should be laid down concerning the type, format and means of communications necessary to implement this Regulation. These should include communications from Member States to the Commission. (93) To ensure fair and controllable use of Community budget, penalties with financial consequences are to be foreseen in case Member States do not comply with communication obligations. (94) Information necessary for the verification and auditing of the implementation of the provisions of this Regulation should be retained by Member States for inspection for an appropriate period. (95) The payments made under Title II and Title V of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 should be made in full to the beneficiaries. In order to avoid undue administrative burden, Member States should be allowed to pay the insurance support to producers through insurance companies in accordance with certain conditions. (96) Provisions should be made for resolving cases of obvious error, force majeure and other exceptional circumstances to ensure fair treatment of producers. Rules for artificially created situations should be provided for in order to avoid any benefit being derived from such situations. (97) Provisions should be made for a smooth transition from the previous system to the new system set out in this Regulation and the implementation of the transitional provisions set out in Article 128 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008. (98) The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, Whereas: HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:







TITLE I

INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS

Article 1

Scope and use of terms

1. This Regulation lays down implementing rules concerning the application of the following provisions of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008:

(a) support measures (Title II);

(b) trade with third countries (Title IV);

(c) production potential (Title V);

(d) inventory as foreseen in Article 109;

(e) controls in the wine sector (Article 117); and

(f) measurement of areas as foreseen in Article 121(c).

This Regulation shall not affect the application of:

(a) specific provisions governing relations between Member States in combating fraud in the wine sector in so far as they are such as to facilitate the application of this Regulation;

(b) rules relating to: (i) criminal proceedings or mutual assistance among Member States at judicial level in criminal matters; (ii) the administrative penalties procedure.

2. Terms used in Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 shall have the same meaning when used in this Regulation.

▼M1

3. For the purposes of Title II, ‘operation’ shall mean a project, contract or arrangement, or other action included in a given support programme, corresponding to any of the activities under the measures referred to in Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 and implemented by one or more beneficiaries.

▼B







TITLE II

SUPPORT PROGRAMMES







CHAPTER I

Procedure for submission

▼M5

Article 2

Submission of support programmes

1. The first submission of the draft support programme referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 103k(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall refer to the five financial years 2009 to 2013.

▼M7

For the financial years 2014 to 2018, Member States shall submit their draft support programme to the Commission by 1 March 2013. By way of derogation, Croatia shall submit its draft support programme by 1 July 2013. If the national envelopes foreseen from the financial year 2014 and onwards are modified after that date, the Member States shall adapt the support programmes accordingly.

▼M5

Member States shall make their draft support programme available to the Commission by electronic means using the form in Annex I.

Member States shall submit their financial planning for the draft support programme referred to in the first and second subparagraphs to the Commission in the form set out in Annex II.

2. Member States shall notify the Commission their legislation related to the draft support programmes referred to in paragraph 1 once adopted or modified. This notification can be done by informing the Commission about the site where the legislation concerned is publicly available.

▼M6

3. Member States deciding to reduce, from the 2015 financial year onwards, the amount available for the support programmes in order to increase their national ceilings for direct payments referred to in Article 40 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 ( 10 ), shall notify these amounts before 1 August 2013. The data submitted in the forms provided in Annexes I, II, III, VII and VIII shall be adapted accordingly if that decrease had not been already foreseen in the draft support programme presented by 1 March 2013.

▼M5

4. Member States deciding to set up their support programme including regional particularities may also submit details by region in the form provided for in Annex III.

5. Member States shall bear the responsibility for expenditure between the date on which their support programme is received by the Commission and the date of its applicability according to Article 103k(2), first subparagraph of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.

▼B

Article 3

Modifications of support programmes

1. Revised programmes referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 shall be submitted to the Commission in the form set out in Annex I to this Regulation including, where applicable, the revised financial planning in the form set out in Annex IV to this Regulation.

Member States referred to in Article 5(4) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 need not submit the form set out in Annex IV.

Member States shall bear the responsibility for expenditure between the date on which their support programme revision is received by the Commission and the date of its applicability according to Article 5(2) second subparagraph of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008.

▼M13

2. Modifications in respect of support programmes shall not be submitted more than twice per financial year, by 1 March and 30 June, except in cases of emergency measures due to natural disasters.

The modified programmes shall be submitted to the Commission with, where appropriate:

(a) updated versions of the support programme in the form set out in Annex I and of the financial table in the form set out in Annex IV;

(b) the reasons for the proposed changes.

By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the deadlines set out in that subparagraph do not apply in 2014 where the modifications of the programme follow the new rules introduced by Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council ( 11 ).

▼B







CHAPTER II

Eligible measures







▼M12

Section 1

Promotion







▼M12

Sub-section 1

Promotion in third countries

▼B

Article 4

Eligible operations and markets

Wines referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 shall be eligible for promotion on third-country markets provided that:

(a) the products are intended for direct consumption, export opportunities or potential new market outlets in the targeted third countries exist for them, and they display high added value;

(b) the origin of the product is indicated as part of an information or promotion operation in the case of wine with a geographical indication;

(c) the operation supported is clearly defined, including the specification of which products may be taken into account, the marketing operation and the estimated cost;

▼M6

(d) for each programming period, the support for the promotion and information lasts no longer than three years for a given beneficiary in a given third-country; however, if necessary, it may be renewed once, for a period no longer than two years;

▼B

(e) the information and/or promotion messages are based on the intrinsic qualities of the wine, and comply with the legislation applicable in the third countries at which they are targeted;

(f) The beneficiaries must have enough capacity to face the specific constraints of trade with third countries and have resources to ensure that the measure is implemented as effectively as possible. Member States shall in particular check that enough products in terms of quality and quantity will be available to ensure answering the market demand in the long run after the promotion operation.

The beneficiaries may be private companies as well as professional organisations, producer organisations, inter-branch organisations or, where a Member State decides so, to public bodies. In any event, Member States shall not make a public body the sole beneficiary of the promotion measure.

▼M6 —————

▼B

In order to prevent misuse of the scheme, the elements referred to in paragraphs (a) and (c) shall not in general be permitted to change within the duration of the supported actions unless evidence shows that such changes allow for a better accomplishment.

Article 5

Selection procedure

Member States shall lay down the application procedure and the procedure for the possible renewal, as referred to in point (d) of the first paragraph of Article 4, which shall in particular provide detailed rules on:

◄

(a) verification of the compliance with the requirements and criteria set out in Article 4;

(b) deadlines for presentation of applications and for examination of the suitability of each proposed action;

(c) the products concerned and their marketing in conformity with the provisions of this Regulation, the national provisions and the relevant specification;

(d) conclusion of contracts, including possible standard forms, provision of securities and arrangements for the payment of advances;

▼M3

(e) evaluating any given supported action. In case of renewal in accordance with point (d) of the first paragraph of Article 4, the results of the supported actions shall in addition be evaluated prior to the renewal.

▼B

2. The Member States shall select the application in particular against the following criteria:

(a) consistency between the strategies proposed and the objectives set;

(b) the quality of the proposed measures;

(c) their likely impact and success in increasing demand for the products concerned;

(d) assurances that any operator involved is effective and has access to the required technical capacity and that the cost of the measure which he plans to carry out himself is not in excess of the normal market rates.

▼M6

3. Having examined the applications, Member States shall select those offering the best value for money. Preference shall be given to:

(a) micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC ( 12 );

(b) new beneficiaries who did not receive support in the past; and

(c) beneficiaries targeting a new third country for which they have not received support in the past within this scheme. Member States shall draw up a list within the limit of available funds and shall communicate that list to the Commission using the form set out in Annex VIII in order to allow the other Member States to be informed and to increase coherence of the measure.

▼B

4. Two or more Member States may decide to select a joint promotion operation. They shall undertake to contribute to the financing and agree on administrative collaboration procedures to facilitate the monitoring, implementation and checking.

5. Member States shall ensure that any national or regional supported campaign are in agreement with measures financed under Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 or Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 and measures funded under national and regional campaigns.

6. No support shall be granted under Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 for a given operation supported under Article 20(c)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 or under Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 3/2008.

7. Member States may provide for support to be advanced before any operation has been implemented, provided that the beneficiary has lodged a security.

8. Where Member States grant national aid for promotion, they shall communicate them in the relevant part of Annexes I, V, VII and VIII to this Regulation.

▼M12 —————

▼M12







Sub-section 2

Promotion in the Member States

Article 5b

Eligible operations

1. The sub-measure of the promotion of Union wines referred to in Article 45(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall consist of information for consumers as regards:

(a) responsible consumption of wine and the risk associated with alcohol consumption;

(b) the Union scheme of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications, in particular conditions and effects, in relation to the specific quality, reputation or other characteristics of wine due to its particular geographical environment or origin.

2. The information activities referred to in paragraph 1 may be carried out through information campaigns and through participation in events, fairs and exhibitions of national or Union importance.

3. Operations shall be eligible under the promotion measure provided that:

(a) they are clearly defined, describing the information activities and including the estimated cost;

(b) they comply with the legislation applicable in the Member State where they are carried out;

(c) the beneficiaries have resources to ensure that the measure is implemented effectively.

4. The beneficiaries shall be professional organisations, producer organisations, association of producer organisations, inter-branch organisations or public bodies. However, a public body shall not be the sole beneficiary of a promotion measure.

Article 5c

Characteristics of the information

1. The information referred to in Article 5b(1) shall be based on the intrinsic qualities of wine or its characteristics and shall not be brand-oriented or encourage the consumption of wine on the grounds of its specific origin. However, where information is disseminated for the purpose of Article 5b(1)(b), the origin of a wine may be indicated as part of the information operation.

2. All information concerning the effects of wine consumption on health and behaviour shall be based on generally accepted scientific data and shall be accepted by the national authority responsible for public health in the Member State where the operations are carried out.

Article 5d

Duration of the support

The support for promotion operations shall last no longer than three years.

Article 5e

Advance payments

Member States may provide for support to be advanced before any operation has been implemented, provided that the beneficiary has lodged a security.

Article 5f

Demarcation with rural development and promotion of agricultural products

Member States shall introduce clear demarcation criteria in their national support programmes to ensure that no support is granted under Article 45(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 for the operations supported under other Union instruments.

▼M13

Article 5fa

Selection procedure

1. Member States shall lay down the application procedure, which shall in particular provide rules on:

(a) verification of compliance with the requirements and criteria set out in Articles 5b and 5c;

(b) deadlines for the presentation of application and for the examination of the suitability of each proposed action;

(c) conclusion of contracts including possible standard forms, provision of securities and arrangements for the payment of advances;

(d) evaluating any given supported action including the appropriate indicators.

2. Member States shall select the application in particular on the basis of the following criteria:

(a) consistency between the strategies proposed and the objectives set;

(b) the quality of the proposed measures;

(c) their likely impact and success in raising consumers awareness about the Union system of protected designation of origin and protected geographical indications or about responsible consumption of wine and the risk associated with alcohol consumption;

(d) assurances that any operator involved is effective and has access to the required technical capacity and that the cost of the measure which he plans to carry out himself is not in excess of the normal market rates.

3. Having examined the applications, Member States shall select those offering the best value for money.

Preference shall be given to operations:

(a) concerning several Member States;

(b) concerning several administrative or wine regions;

(c) concerning several protected designations of origin or protected geographical indications.

4. Two or more Member States may decide to select a joint promotion operation. They shall undertake to contribute to the financing and agree on administrative collaboration procedures to facilitate the monitoring, implementation and checking of the joint promotion operation.

5. Where Member States grant national aids for promotion, they shall communicate them in the relevant part of Annexes I, V, VII, VIII and VIIIc to this Regulation.

▼M12







Sub-section 3

Common rules

Article 5g

Eligible costs

1. Personnel costs of the beneficiary referred to in Articles 4 and 5b shall be considered eligible if they are incurred in relation to the preparation, implementation or follow-up of the particular supported promotion project, including the evaluation. This includes the costs of the personnel contracted by the beneficiary specifically on the occasion of the promotion project and the costs corresponding to the share of the working hours invested in the promotion project by permanent staff of the beneficiary.

Member States shall only accept personnel costs as eligible if the beneficiaries provide supporting documents setting out the details of the work actually carried out in relation to the particular supported promotion project.

2. Overheads incurred by the beneficiary shall be considered eligible if:

(a) they are related to the preparation, implementation or follow-up of the project, and;

(b) they do not exceed 4 % of the actual costs of implementing the projects.

Member States may decide whether those overheads are eligible on the basis of a flat rate or on the basis of the presentation of supporting documents. In the latter case, the calculation of those costs shall be based on the accounting principles, rules and methods used in the beneficiary's country where the beneficiary is established.

▼B







Section 2

Restructuring and conversion of vineyards

▼M6

Article 6

Ineligible operations

1. For the purposes of the second subparagraph of Article 103q(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, ‘the normal renewal of vineyards which have come to the end of their natural life’ shall mean the replanting of the same parcel of land with the same variety according to the same system of vine cultivation. Member States may establish further specifications, especially as regards to the age of the vineyards replaced.

2. The following operations are not eligible:

(a) day-to-day management of a vineyard;

(b) protection against damage by game, birds or hail;

(c) construction of windbreaks and wind protection walls;

(d) driveways and elevators.

▼M12

Article 6a

Replanting for health or phytosanitary reasons

1. Replanting of a vineyard following a mandatory grubbing-up for health or phytosanitary reasons on the instruction of a competent authority of a Member State referred to in Article 46(3)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be eligible provided that the Member State:

(a) provides for that possibility in its national support programme;

(b) communicates to the Commission in the framework of the submission of the national support programme or its modification the list of harmful organisms covered by that measure as well as a summary of a related strategic plan established by the competent authority of the Member State concerned;

(c) complies with Council Directive 2000/29/EC ( 13 ).

2. The expenditure for replanting for health or phytosanitary reasons shall not exceed 15 % of the total annual expenditure on restructuring and conversion of vineyards in the Member State concerned.

3. Member States shall introduce clear demarcation criteria in their national support programmes to ensure that no support is granted under Article 46(3)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 for operations supported under other Union instruments.

▼B

Article 7

Procedure and applications

1. Member States shall lay down:

(a) time limits for the implementation of restructuring operations, which shall not exceed five years;

(b) bodies or individuals that may submit draft applications;

(c) objective criteria for their prioritisation notably in accordance with Article 104(9) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008;

(d) the content of the request, which shall include detailed descriptions of the proposed measures and proposed deadlines for their execution;

(e) the procedure for the presentation and approval of request, which shall in particular provide for deadlines for the submission of requests and objective criteria for their prioritisation;

(f) a requirement that all requests shall state, for each financial year, the measures to be implemented in that financial year, and the area concerned by each measure and procedures for monitoring such implementation.

2. Member States may lay down a minimum size of the area which may qualify for support for restructuring and conversion, and a minimum size of area resulting from restructuring and conversion and any derogation from this requirement which shall be duly justified and based on objective criteria.

▼M6

Article 8

Levels of support

1. Subject to the provisions of Article 103q of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 and of this Chapter, Member States shall lay down rules setting out the eligible restructuring and conversion actions and their respective eligible costs. The rules shall be designed to ensure that the objective of the scheme is met.

The rules may provide in particular either for the payment of flat-rate amounts, or for maximum levels of support per hectare. In addition, the rules may provide for the adjustment of the support on the basis of objective criteria.

2. In order to avoid overcompensation, where Member States make use of flat rate amounts, these shall be established on the basis of an accurate calculation of the actual costs of each type of operation. Flat rate amounts may be adapted annually if justified.

3. The support is paid for the area planted, defined in conformity with Article 75(1).

▼B

Article 9

Financial management

Support shall be paid once it is ascertained that either a single operation or all the operations covered by the support application, according to the choice made by the Member State for the management of the measure, have been implemented and checked on-the-spot, in accordance with Article 81 of this Regulation.

◄

Where support is normally payable only after implementation of all the operations, support shall nevertheless be paid for single operations implemented if the remaining operations could not be carried out due to force majeure or exceptional circumstances within the meaning of Article 40(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 ( 14 ).

If checks show that an overall operation covered by the support application has not been fully implemented for reasons other than force majeure or exceptional circumstances within the meaning of Article 40(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, and where support has been paid after single operations which are part of the overall operation covered by the support application, Member States shall decide to recover the aid paid.

2. As an exception to paragraph 1, the Member States may provide for support for a given operation, or for all the operations covered by the support application, to be advanced to producers before that any operation has been implemented, provided that implementation has begun and the beneficiary has lodged a security. For the purposes of Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 ( 15 ), the obligation shall be to implement the operations concerned by the end of the second wine year following payment of the advance.

That period may be adjusted by the Member State in cases where:

(a) areas concerned are part of an area which has suffered a natural disaster recognised by the competent authorities of the Member State concerned;

(b) planned operations cannot be implemented because the plant material suffers health problems which have been certified by a body recognised by the Member State concerned.

In order for support to be paid in advance, any previous operation carried out on the same area, for which the producer also received support in advance, must have been fully implemented.

If checks show that the measure covered by the aid application, and for which an advance has been paid, has not been fully implemented, the Member States may decide to apply a penalty.

▼M6 —————

▼M1

Article 10a

Compatibility and consistency

1. The support for costs of restructuring and conversion referred to in Article 11(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 shall not cover purchase expenses of farm vehicles.

2. No operation shall be included for support pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 under a national support programme in accordance with Title II of that Regulation for a given Member State or region which is included for support in the rural development programme of that Member State or region under Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.

3. Member States shall present the operations they include in their support programmes for the restructuring and conversion measure in the relevant part of Annex I in such detail as to allow for verification that that operation is not included for support in their rural development programmes.

▼B







Section 3

Green harvesting

Article 11

Definition of green harvesting

For the purposes of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 and of this Section, leaving commercial grapes on the plants at the end of the normal production cycle (non-harvesting) shall not be considered green harvesting.

In addition, the area of any parcel supported with green harvesting shall not be counted when calculating the yield limits set in the technical specifications of wines with a geographical indication.

Article 12

Conditions for the implementation of green harvesting

1. In relation to the green harvesting measure, Member States shall:

(a) adopt detailed provisions on the implementation of the measure, including: (i) prior notification of green harvesting; (ii) the amount of compensation to be paid; (iii) rules to ensure that the areas concerned will be kept in good vegetative conditions and that no negative impact on the environment nor any negative phytosanitary consequences result from the application of the measure and ensure that it is possible to check that the measure is carried out correctly; in relation to these objectives Member States may apply restrictions to the measure based on objective and non discriminatory criteria, including timing of different varieties, environmental or phytosanitary risks or the method;

(b) set the deadline for applications of green harvesting between 15 April and 31 May of each year;

(c) establish by 31 May an expected market situation justifying the application of green harvesting to restore market balance and to prevent crisis;

(d) ensure that the measure is carried out correctly by controlling whether a green harvesting operation is performed successfully; areas receiving green harvesting support shall be systematically verified on the spot after the execution; the plots checked shall be those which are the subject of an application for aid. The control referred to in point (d) of the first subparagraph shall include: (i) verification of the existence of the vineyard concerned and whether the given area has been properly tended; (ii) that all bunches have been totally removed of destroyed; (iii) which method has been used; each farmer applying for green harvesting aid shall keep evidence of the costs of the operation. In order to ensure that no more marketable grapes are left in the supported parcel, all controls shall take place between 15 June and 31 July of each year and, in any case, they will be complete by the normal time of Veraison (Baggiolini stage M, BBCH stage 83) in any given area.

2. Green harvesting shall not be applied on the same parcel for two consecutive years.

3. In case of complete or partial damage of the crops due to in particular natural disaster within the meaning of Article 2(8) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 ( 16 ) before the date of green harvesting, no support shall be granted.

4. In case of complete or partial damage occurring between the payment of the green harvesting support and the harvesting period, no harvest insurance financial compensation of the loss of income may be granted for the area already supported.

Article 13

Application procedure

1. Member States shall lay down the application procedure shall in particular provide for the applicable premium to the producer concerned and the information required to accompany the application. The application shall contain details on the area, the average yield, the method to be used as well as the grape variety and the type of wine produced from it.

2. Member States shall verify whether the applications are well founded. For this purpose, they may foresee that a written undertaking of the producer is lodged upon application. In case the application is withdrawn without duly justified reason they may provide for the producer concerned to bear the costs incurred concerning the treatment of its request.

Article 14

Compensation

1. Each year Member States shall calculate the direct costs of green harvesting according to the different methods manual, mechanical and chemical that they allow in relation to Article 12(1)(a)(iii). In case more than one method is used on the same given area, compensation shall be calculated on the basis of the cheapest method.

2. The Member States shall define the loss of revenue caused by green harvesting on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria.

Subject to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 Member States shall fix the level of support provided for in Article 12(3) of that Regulation on the basis of standard costs and standard assumptions of loss of revenue. Member States shall ensure that the calculations:

(a) contain only elements that are verifiable;

(b) are based on figures established by appropriate expertise;

(c) indicate clearly the source of the figures;

(d) are differentiated to take into account regional or local site conditions as appropriate.

The premium is paid for the area planted, defined in conformity with Article 75(1) of this Regulation.







Section 4

Mutual funds

Article 15

Level of the aid

The measure referred to in Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, may be introduced by the Member States in their support programme according to the following rules:

(a) the support period should not exceed three years;

(b) support for the administrative cost of setting up mutual funds shall be limited, in the first, second and third year of operation of the mutual fund respectively, to the following proportion of the contribution of the producers to the mutual fund in the first, second and third year of its operation: (i) 10 %, 8 % and 4 % in the Member States which acceded to the Community on 1 May 2004 or thereafter; (ii) 5 %, 4 % and 2 % in other Member States;

(c) Member States may fix ceilings for the amounts of the administrative costs that may be received for the setting up of mutual funds;

(d) Member States shall adopt detailed provisions for the implementation of that measure.







Section 5

Harvest insurance

Article 16

Conditions of eligibility

The measure referred to in Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, may be introduced by the Member States in their support programme according to the following rules:

(a) in relation to harvest insurance measures, Member States shall adopt detailed provisions on the implementation of those measures, including those necessary to ensure that harvest insurance measures do not distort competition in the insurance market;

(b) producers applying for the scheme shall make their insurance policy available to the national authorities in order to allow the Member States to comply with the condition referred to in Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008;

(c) member States shall fix ceilings on the amounts that may be received for the support in order to respect the conditions referred to in Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008. Where appropriate, Member States may fix the level on the basis of standard costs and standard assumptions of income loss. Member States shall ensure that the calculations: (i) contain only elements that are verifiable; (ii) are based on figures established by appropriate expertise; (iii) indicate clearly the source of the figures; (iv) are differentiated to take into account regional or local site conditions as appropriate.

For the purposes of Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, an ‘adverse climatic event which can be assimilated to a natural disaster’ shall have the same meaning as in Article 2(8) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006.

Where Member States grant national aid for harvest insurance, they shall communicate them in the relevant part of Annexes I, V and VII to this Regulation.







Section 6

Investments

Article 17

Eligible measures

The supported investments shall respect the Community standards applicable to the investment concerned.

Eligible expenditure shall be:

(a) the construction, acquisition, including leasing, or improvement of immovable property;

(b) the purchase or lease-purchase of new machinery and equipment, including computer software up to the market value of the asset; other costs connected with the leasing contract, such as lessor’s margin, interest refinancing costs, overheads and insurance charges, shall not be eligible expenditure;

(c) general costs linked to expenditure referred to in points (a), and (b), such as fees of architects and engineers and consultation fees, feasibility studies, the acquisition of patent rights and licences.

By way of derogation from point (b), and only for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC ( 17 ), Member States may, in duly substantiated cases, establish the conditions under which the purchase of second-hand equipment may be regarded as eligible expenditure.

Simple replacement investments shall not be eligible expenditure so as to make sure that the aim of the measure, i.e. the improvement in terms of adjustment to market demand and increased competitiveness, is met by these investments in the processing chain measure.

Article 18

Eligible measures for the development of new products

Costs for the development of new products, processes and technologies as referred to in Article 15(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, shall concern preparatory operations, such as design, product, process or technology development and tests and tangible and/or intangible investments related to them, before the use of the newly developed products, processes and technologies for commercial purposes.

Simple replacement investments shall not be eligible expenditure so as to make sure that the aim of the measure, i.e. the improvement in terms of adjustment to market demand and increased competitiveness, is met by these supports.

▼M2

Article 19

Financial management

1. Support shall be paid once it is ascertained that either a single operation or all the operations covered by the support application, according to the choice made by the Member State for the management of the measure, have been implemented and controlled on the spot.

Where support is normally payable only after implementation of all the operations, by way of derogation from the first subparagraph, support shall be paid for single operations implemented if the remaining operations could not be carried out due to force majeure or exceptional circumstances as referred to in Article 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 ( 18 ).

If checks show that an overall operation covered by the support application has not been fully implemented for reasons other than force majeure or exceptional circumstances as referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, and where support has been paid after single operations which are part of the overall operation covered by the support application, Member States shall decide to recover the aid paid.

2. Beneficiaries of investment support may request the payment of an advance from the competent paying agencies if this option is included in the national support programme.

▼M9

The amount of the advances shall not exceed 20 % of the public aid related to the investment, and its payment shall be subject to the establishment of a bank guarantee or an equivalent guarantee corresponding to 110 % of the amount of the advance. However, in the case of investments for which the individual decision to grant support is taken in the financial years 2013, 2014 or 2015, the amount of the advances may be increased up to 50 % of the public aid related to that investment. For the purposes of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2012 ( 19 ) the obligation shall be to spend the total amount advanced in the implementation of the operation concerned two years after its payment.

▼M2

The guarantee shall be released when the competent paying agency establishes that the amount of actual expenditure corresponding to the public aid related to the investment exceeds the amount of the advance.

▼M1

Article 20

Compatibility and consistency

1. No support shall be granted for marketing operations which received support under Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008.

Where Member States grant national aid for investments, they shall communicate them in the relevant part of the forms set out in Annexes I, V and VII to this Regulation.

2. No operation shall be included for support pursuant to Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 under a national support programme in accordance with Title II of that Regulation for a given Member State or region which is included for support in the rural development programme of that Member State or region under Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.

3. Member States shall present the operations they include in their support programmes for the investment measure in the relevant part of Annex I in such detail as to allow for verification that that operation is not included for support in their rural development programmes.

▼M12







Section 6a

Innovation

Article 20a

Eligible operations

1. The innovation in the wine sector referred to in Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall consist of the development of the following:

(a) new products related to the wine sector or by-products of wine,

(b) new processes and technologies necessary for the development of grape wine products.

2. The eligible costs shall concern tangible and intangible investments for knowledge-transfer, preparatory operations and pilot studies.

3. The beneficiaries of support for innovation shall be producers of the products referred to in Part II of Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and wine producer organisations.

Research and development centres shall participate in the project supported by the beneficiaries. Interbranch organisations may be associated to the project.

4. Beneficiaries of support for innovation may request the payment of an advance from the paying agencies where that option is included in the national support programme. The payment of the advance shall be subject to a requirement to lodge a security.

5. Simple replacement investments shall not be eligible expenditure.

Article 20b

Demarcation with rural development and other legal regimes and financial instruments

Member States shall introduce clear demarcation criteria in their national support programmes to ensure that no support is granted under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 for operations supported under other Union instruments.

▼M13

Article 20c

Financial management

1. Support shall be paid once it is ascertained that either a single operation or all the operations covered by the support application, according to the choice made by the Member State for the management of the measure, have been implemented and controlled on the spot.

Where support is normally payable only after implementation of all the operations, by way of derogation from the first subparagraph, support shall be paid for single operations implemented if the remaining operations could not be carried out due to force majeure or exceptional circumstances as referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council ( 20 ).

If checks show that an overall operation covered by the support application has not been fully implemented for reasons other than force majeure or exceptional circumstances as referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 and where support has been paid after single operations which are part of the overall operation covered by the support application, Member States shall decide to recover the aid paid.

2. Beneficiaries of support for innovation may request the payment of an advance from the competent paying agencies if this option is included in the national support programme.

The amount of the advances shall not exceed 20 % of the public aid related to the investment in innovation, and its payment shall be subject to the establishment of a bank guarantee or an equivalent guarantee corresponding to 110 % of the amount of the advance. However, in the case of investments in innovation for which the individual decision to grant support is taken in the financial years 2014 or 2015, the amount of the advances may be increased up to 50 % of the public aid related to that investment. For the purposes of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2012 ( 21 ) the obligation shall be to spend the total amount advanced in the implementation of the operation concerned two years after its payment.

The guarantee shall be released when the competent paying agency establishes that the amount of actual expenditure corresponding to the public aid related to the innovation exceeds the amount of the advance.

▼B







Section 7

Disposal of by-products

Article 21

Fixing a minimum percentage of alcohol

1. Subject to point 1 of Annex VI.D to Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, Member States shall establish the volume of alcohol that must be contained in the by-products in relation to that contained in the wine produced. Member States may modulate the minimum percentage of alcohol on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria.

2. Should the relevant percentage fixed by Member States in application of the first paragraph not be reached, those subject to the obligation shall deliver a quantity of wine from their own production, thus ensuring attainment of that percentage.

3. For the purpose of determining the volume of alcohol contained in the by-products in relation to that contained in the wine produced, the standard wine natural alcoholic strengths by volume to be applied in the different wine-growing zones shall be:

(a) 8,0 % for zone A;

(b) 8,5 % for zone B;

(c) 9,0 % for zone C I;

(d) 9,5 % for zone C II;

(e) 10,0 % for zone C III.

Article 22

Disposal of by-products

Producers shall be required to withdraw the by-products of wine-making, or any other processing of grapes, under supervision subject to the following conditions:

(a) the by-products shall be withdrawn without delay and no later than the end of the wine year in which they were obtained; Member States may fix an earlier deadline; withdrawal, together with an indication of the estimated quantities, shall be either entered in the registers kept in accordance with Article 112(2) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, or certified by the competent authority;

(b) withdrawal shall respect applicable Community legislation, in particular as regards the environment.

The withdrawal of the wine lees in question shall be regarded as having taken place once the lees have been denatured to make their use in winemaking impossible and where the delivery of the denatured lees to third parties has been entered in the registers kept in accordance with Article 112(2) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that such transactions are checked. They may have a system of prior recognition of the concerned third parties.

Member States may decide that producers who, during the wine year in question, do not produce more than 25 hectolitres of wine or must themselves on their own premises are not required to withdraw their by-products.

Article 23

Disposal with by-product distillation

1. Producers may fulfil the obligation of disposal for a part or for the entirety of the by-products of wine-making or any other processing of grapes, by delivering the by-products to distillation.

2. Member States may require that the delivery to distillation of a part or of the entirety of the by-products of wine making or of any other processing of grapes is made compulsory for a part or for the entirety of their producers, on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria. This obligation can be also fulfilled by the delivery of wine to the vinegar industry.

3. The relevant Member States may introduce a system of certification of distillers according to a procedure that they lay down.

Article 24

Purpose of the aid

1. The aid referred to in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 shall be paid, subject to the condition referred to in paragraph 3 and within the limit of the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 of the same Article, to distillers that process the products delivered to distillation into raw alcohol with an alcoholic strength of at least 92 % vol.

2. The relevant aid shall include a lump-sum amount destined to compensate the costs of collection of these products which shall be transferred from the distiller to the producer, if the relevant costs are borne by the latter.

3. Member States may provide for support to be advanced provided that the beneficiary has lodged a security.

4. Member States shall adopt detailed rules for applying the measure provided for in this Article.

Article 25

Amount of the aid

1. The maximum amount of the aid referred to in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 to be paid to distillers is established by % volume alcohol and by hectolitre in the following manner:

(a) for raw alcohol obtained from marcs: EUR 1,1/%vol./hl;

(b) for raw alcohol obtained from wine and lees: EUR 0,5/%vol./hl.

2. Member States shall fix, within the limits provided for in paragraph 1 on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria, the amount of aid and the lump-sum compensation for the collection costs referred to in Article 24(2), and communicate them to the Commission in the relevant part of Annexes I, V and VII forms. These amounts may be adjusted according to different production typologies, on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria.

▼M1

Article 25a

Verification of conditions

The competent authorities of the Member States shall take all necessary steps to verify respect of the conditions and the limit referred to in Article 24(1) of this Regulation in conjunction with Article 16(3) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008. Member States may verify the respect of this limit at the level of each producer or at the national level. Member States which opt for verification at the national level shall not include in the alcohol balance the quantities which are not intended for distillation (withdrawal under supervision) nor those which are intended for the development of products other than alcohol for industrial use.

▼M6 —————

▼B







CHAPTER III

Reporting, evaluation and general provisions

Article 35

Reporting and evaluation

▼M11

1. Member States shall submit to the Commission by 1 March each year, a report on the implementation of the measures provided for in their support programmes referred to in Section 4 of Chapter II of Title I of Part II of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 22 ) during the previous financial year.

Those reports shall list and describe the measures for which Union assistance under the support programmes was granted.

Those reports shall be presented by Member States to the Commission in the form set out in Annexes V and VI to this Regulation. The information contained in the appropriate tables shall refer to each year in respect of the measures of the support programme:

(a) a statement of expenditure by financial year already incurred in the programming period which will in no cases overshoot the budgetary limit for the Member State as laid down in Annex VI to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013;

(b) forecasts for subsequent financial years until the end of the planned period of implementation of the support programme, up to the budgetary limit for the Member State as laid down in VI to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and in coherence with the most updated submission sent in accordance with Article 3 of this Regulation.

▼B

2. In the same communication, technical data related to the implementation of the measures in the support programme, shall be presented by the Member States in the form set out in Annex VII. The details on the implementation of the promotion measure shall be presented by the Member States in the form set out in Annex VIII.

3. References to a given financial year shall refer to payments actually made by Member States between 16 October and 15 October of the following year.

▼M11

4. Member States shall, by 1 March 2014 and, a second time, by 1 March 2017, submit to the Commission an evaluation of the costs and benefits of the support programmes as well as an indication of how to increase their efficiency.

Those evaluations shall be presented by the Member States to the Commission in the form set out in Annexes V and VI. In addition the following items shall be inserted in the conclusions:

C1 : Evaluation of the costs and benefits of the support programme,

C2 : Ways to increase the efficiency of the support programme.

▼B

5. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the measures taken to comply with the provisions foreseen in Article 9(1) and 12(1)(d). The communication shall be made in the form set out in Annexes VIIIa and VIIIb.

▼M6

6. Member States deciding to transfer, for 2014 and from 2015 onwards, the entire amount of their national envelope for the support programmes in order to increase their national ceilings for direct payments referred to in Article 40 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, shall not be required to submit the forms set out in Annexes V to VIIIc to this Regulation.

▼B

7. Member States shall record the details of all support programmes, whether or not amended, and of all measures carried out in pursuance of programmes.

Article 36

Exclusion

None of the financial support from the national support programmes may be granted to producers concerned by unlawful areas referred to in Articles 85 and 86 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 and for graft nurseries as referred to in Article 60(3) of this Regulation.

Article 37

Payment delay to beneficiaries

Member States shall for each measure with the exception of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008:

(a) set the application deadline;

(b) after the date of lodging a valid and complete application, pay the beneficiaries within: (i) seven months for measures which can be completed and controlled within one year; (ii) a reasonable period to be set by the Member State and to be communicated to the Commission in the relevant parts of Annex I for measures which cannot be completed and controlled within one year.

▼M2

Article 37a

Communication related to State aid

1. Notwithstanding Article 5(8), the third paragraph of Article 16 and the second subparagraph of Article 20(1) of this Regulation, when Member States grant State aid in accordance with Article 103n(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 ( 23 ), they shall communicate to the Commission the following:

(a) when applicable, the list of aid measures already authorised under Articles 87, 88 and 89 of the Treaty to be used for the implementation of the programmes or the reason why the national aid in question has been exempted from any notification obligations;

(b) in other cases, the elements that are needed for the appraisal under competition rules.

2. If paragraph (1)(a) is applicable, Member States shall fill in Table 1 of Annex VIIIc,

(a) indicating whether support will be granted in respect of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1535/2007 ( 24 ) on de minimis support for primary production in the agriculture sector or Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 ( 25 ) for processing and marketing of agricultural products; or

(b) providing the registration number and the reference to the Commission exemption Regulation adopted on the basis of Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 ( 26 ) under which the measure was introduced; or

(c) providing the case number and reference number under which the measure has been declared compatible with the Treaty by the Commission.

3. If paragraph (1)(b) is applicable, Member States shall transmit to the Commission

(a) Table 2 of Annex VIIIc for each of the measures referred to in Articles 103p, 103t and 103u of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 for which national aid is granted;

(b) Table 3 of Annex VIIIc in case of national aid granted for the measure promotion on third country markets as referred to in Article 103p of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007;

(c) Table 4 of Annex VIIIc in case of national aid granted for the harvest insurance measure referred to in Article 103t of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007;

(d) Table 5 of Annex VIIIc in case of national aid granted for the investments measure referred to in Article 103u of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.

4. The elements communicated in form of any of the tables of Annex VIIIc must be valid over the entire life cycle of the programme without prejudice to any subsequent changes of the programmes.

5. Notwithstanding Article 103n(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 and without prejudice to Article 3(2) of this Regulation, Member States granting national aid shall modify their support programme for the future, by filling in the appropriate tables of Annex VIIIb by 15 October 2009 at the latest. Article 103k(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 apply to these modifications.

▼M9

Article 37b

Communication related to advances

▼M13

1. Where advances are granted in accordance with Articles 5(7), 5e, 9(2), 19(2), 20a(4) and 24(3), beneficiaries are requested to provide for each project annually to the paying agencies the following information:

(a) costs statements justifying by measure the use of the advances until 15 October, and;

(b) a confirmation by measure of the balance of unused advances remaining on 15 October.

Member States shall define in their national rules the date of transmission of this information in order for it to be included in the current annual accounts of the paying agencies referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 within the deadline laid down in Article 7(2) of that Regulation.

▼M9

2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to the annual accounts of 2013, except where advances of more than 20 % and up to 50 % of the public aid related to the investments are granted in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 19(2).

▼M13

3. For the purposes of Article 18(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2012, the evidence of final entitlement to be produced shall be the last costs statement and a confirmation of the balance referred to in paragraph 1.

Concerning advances under Articles 9(2), 19(2) and 20a(4)of this Regulation, the last costs statement and confirmation of the balancee referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be provided by the end of the second financial year after their payment.

▼B







TITLE III

TRADE WITH THIRD COUNTRIES







CHAPTER I

Entry price arrangements for grape juice and must

Article 38

Definition

For the purposes of this title ‘consignment’ means the quantity of a product consigned by one consignor to one consignee, presented under a single custom declaration for release for free circulation. Each declaration may cover only goods of one and the same origin, as defined in Articles 23 and 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 ( 27 ), falling within a single Combined Nomenclature code.

Article 39

Verification by consignment

1. For products falling within CN codes 2009 61, 2009 69 and 2204 30 listed in Annex I, Part Three, Section I, Annex 2 to the Common Customs Tariff and subject to entry price arrangements, the actual customs value shall be verified by checking every consignment.

2. The entry price in Annex 2 of the Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 ( 28 ) for the products indicated in paragraph 1 shall be determined on the basis of the customs value.







CHAPTER II

Certificates and analysis reports for wine, grape juice and must on import







Section 1

General

Article 40

Documents required

The certificate and the analysis report referred to in Article 82(3)(a) and (b), respectively, of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 shall form a single document:

(a) the ‘certificate’ part of which shall be made out by a body of the third country from which the products comes;

(b) the ‘analysis report’ part of which shall be made out by an official laboratory recognised by the third country from which the products comes.

Article 41

Contents of the analysis report

The analysis report shall include the following information:

(a) in the case of wines and grape must in fermentation: (i) the total alcoholic strength by volume; (ii) the actual alcoholic strength by volume;

(b) in the case of grape must and grape juice, the density;

(c) in the case of wines, grape must and grape juice: (i) the total dry extract; (ii) the total acidity; (iii) the volatile acid content; (iv) the citric acid content; (v) the total sulphur dioxide content. ▼M1 ————— ▼B

Article 42

Exemptions

1. No certificate or analysis report need be presented for products originating in and exported from third countries in labelled containers of not more than five litres fitted with a non-reusable closing device where the total quantity transported, whether or not made up of separate consignments, does not exceed 100 litres.

2. Where products do not fulfil the conditions set out in paragraph 1, no certificate and analysis report needs to be presented for:

(a) wine, grape must and grape juice contained in the personal luggage of travellers within the meaning of Article 45 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 ( 29 ) up to a maximum of 30 litres per traveller;

(b) wine sent in consignments from one private individual to another, within the meaning of Article 29 of Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 up to a maximum of 30 litres per consignment;

(c) wine and grape juice forming part of the personal property of private individuals transferring their normal place of residence from a third country to the Community within the meaning of Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 918/83;

(d) wine and grape juice for trade fairs as defined in Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 918/83, provided that the products in question are put up in labelled containers of not more than two litres fitted with a non-reusable closing device;

(e) quantities of wine, grape must and grape juice in other containers, imported for the purpose of scientific and technical experiments up to a maximum of 100 litres;

(f) wines and grape juice imported in accordance with the provisions of the Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations of 18 April 1961, the Vienna Convention on consular relations of 24 April 1963 or other consular conventions, or the New York Convention of 16 December 1969 on special missions;

(g) wines and grape juice held in stores on board of vessels and aircraft operating in international transport;

(h) wines and grape juice originating and bottled in the European Community, exported to a third country and returned to the customs territory of the Community and released for free circulation.







Section 2

Requirements to be met and detailed rules for drawing up and using the certificate and analysis report for imports of wine, grape juice and grape must

Article 43

V I 1 document

1. The certificate and analysis report for each consignment intended for import into the Community shall be drawn up on a single V I 1 document.

The document referred to in the first subparagraph shall be drawn up on a V I 1 form corresponding to the specimen shown in Annex IX. It shall be signed by an officer of an official body and by an official of a recognised laboratory as referred to in Article 48.

2. Where the product concerned is not intended for direct human consumption, the analysis report section of the V I 1 form need not be completed.

▼M6

In the case of wine put up in labelled containers of a capacity not exceeding 60 litres, fitted with non-reusable closing devices, and provided that the wine originates in a country appearing in Annex XII, part A, which has offered special guarantees accepted by the Community, the analysis report section of the V I 1 form need be completed only in respect of:

▼B

(a) the actual alcoholic strength by volume;

(b) the total acidity;

(c) the total sulphur dioxide content.

Article 44

Description of documents

1. V I 1 forms shall comprise a typed or handwritten original and a simultaneously produced copy, in that or