1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 1
This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
►B COUNCIL REGULATION (EC)No 2334/97
of 24 November 1997
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of flat pallets of wood originating in the
Republic of Poland and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed
(OJ L 324, 27.11.1997, p. 1)
Amended by:
Official Journal
No page date
►M1Council Regulation (EC) No 2079/98 of 24 September 1998 L 266 1 1.10.1998
►M2Council Regulation (EC) No 2048/1999 of 27 September 1999 L 255 1 30.9.1999
►M3Council Regulation (EC) No 1521/2000 of 10 July 2000 L 175 1 14.7.2000
►M4Council Regulation (EC) No 1678/2001 of 13 August 2001 L 227 22 23.8.2001
Corrected by:
►C1Corrigendum, OJ L 221, 1.9.2000, p. 27 (1521/2000)
▼B
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC)No 2334/97
of 24 November 1997
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of flat
pallets of wood originating in the Republic of Poland and collecting
definitively the provisional duty imposed
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December
1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not membersof the European Community(
1), and in particular Articles 9 (4) and 10
(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal presented by the Commission after
consulting the Advisory Committee,
Whereas:
A.PROVISIONAL MEASURES
(1)The Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 1023/97(2) (hereinafter
referred to as the Provisional Regulation) imposed provisionalduties on certain imports into the Community of flat pallets ofwood falling within CN code ex 4415 20 20 and originating inPoland. In addition, undertakings offered by certain exporters in
connection with those imports were accepted by the Provisional
Regulation. The product scope of these undertakings was limitedto a certain type of flat pallets of wood, i.e. EUR-pallets.
(2)By Regulation (EC) No 1632/97(3), the Commission amended the
Provisional Regulation by adding a provision whereby genuine
new Polish exporters can be allocated the weighted average dutyapplicable to cooperating companies not included in the sample ofexporters investigated and can have undertakings accepted withregard to exports of EUR-pallets.
(3)By Regulation (EC) No 1633/97(4), pursuant to the above-
mentioned new provision, the Commission further amended theProvisional Regulation by including a number of genuine newexporters in the list of companies receiving the weighted averageduty and by accepting undertakings from some of these new
exporters.
B.SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE
(4)Following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties,
several interested parties submitted comments in writing. Theparties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heardby the Commission. The Commission continued to seek andverify all the information it deemed necessary for the purpose of
its definitive findings.
(5)Parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on
the basis of which it was intended to recommend the impositionof definitive anti-dumping duties and the definitive collection ofamounts secured by way of provisional subsequent to this
disclosure.
(6)The comments submitted by the interested parties were duly
examined and, where deemed appropriate, taken into account inmaking the definitive findings.1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 2
(1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No
2331/96 (OJ L 317, 6. 12. 1996, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 150, 7. 6. 1997, p. 4.
(3) OJ L 225, 15. 8. 1997, p. 11.
(4) OJ L 225, 15. 8. 1997, p. 13.
▼B
C.PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
(7)According to recitals (8) and (9) of the Provisional Regulation the
product under consideration is flat wooden pallets, falling underCN code ex 4415 20 20 and originating in Poland.
It appeared that the provisional anti-dumping duty on wooden
pallets was not applied consistently by the customs authorities.For example, while some customs offices applied the provisional
anti-dumping duty on used and repaired pallets, others did not. It
was also reported that the anti-dumping duty had in some casesbeen applied to pallets when they were loaded with other goodsfor the purpose of importing these goods into the Community.
(8)Despite the fact that used and repaired pallets have a similar useand physical characteristics closely resembling the productconcerned, i.e. newly produced pallets, the investigation hasshown that newly produced pallets on the one hand and used andrepaired pallets on the other hand differ substantially in terms ofthe perception by potential pallet users and channels through
which they are usually sold.
(9)On the basis of the foregoing, it is concluded that used and
repaired pallets cannot be considered to be like products inaccordance with Article 1 (4) of the Basic Regulation and
therefore these pallets are not covered by the scope of the current
investigation. It follows that anti-dumping measures should notapply to used and repaired pallets but only to imports of newlyproduced flat wooden pallets originating in Poland.
In addition, as regards flat pallets of wood originating in Poland
which are loaded with other goods for the purpose of importing
these goods into the Community, the Commission is of the
opinion that these should be treated as used pallets provided thatthe pallets represent only a minor proportion of the total value ofthe loaded goods imported.
D.DUMPING
1.Normal value
(10)As set out in recital 16 of the Provisional Regulation, in
constructing normal values for pallets other than the EUR-pallet,
the weighted average profit margin relating to domestic sales
found for two investigated companies which had representativeand profitable domestic sales was used for other Polish exportersnot having made representative and/or profitable domestic sales,in accordance with Article 2 (6) (a) of the Basic Regulation.
(11)Two of these other Polish exporters claimed that the domesticsales used as a basis for determining this weighted average profitmargin might not be representative due to circumstances whichare specific to the two companies having made these sales and
which might thus have generated exceptionally high profit levels.
However, the investigation has shown that the sales used tocalculate the weighted average profit margin have been made insufficient quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, and thatthe resulting profit margin can be considered to reasonably reflectthe actual amounts of profit realized on the Polish market.
(12)With regard to the remaining aspects of normal value, in theabsence of any new argument raised by the interested parties, themethodology and the findings as described in recitals 16 to 18 ofthe Provisional Regulation are confirmed.
2.Export price
(13)Following disclosure of the provisional findings, two Polish
exporters, for whom export prices have been constructed inaccordance with Article 2 (9) of the Basic Regulation, and theirrelated importer in the Community have claimed that theadjustments made for selling, general and administrative (SG&1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 3
▼B
A) expenses and profit were excessive in respect of the amounts
actually attributed to the product under investigation.
(14)As regards profits, the Commission has re-examined the issue andhas sought additional information and evidence from independentimporters of wooden pallets on profits made in the investigation
period, i.e. the calendar year 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the
‘IP’). As a result of this re-examination the findings made for thepurpose of the provisional measures are confirmed and, therefore,retained as definitive findings.
(15)In the Provisional Regulation, the amount of SG& A expenseswas determined by allocating these expenses to the productconcerned on the basis of turnover. This allocation key was usedin the absence of a specific, historically utilized allocation or anyother more appropriate method. The company also agreed to this
approach during the on-the-spot verification. Afterwards the
importer proposed a different allocation of SG& A expensesbased on an estimated apportionment of all cost items to theproduct concerned and other activities of the company. However,given that it has not been shown that the new allocation method
has been historically used, the claim had to be rejected and
preference given to the allocation of costs on the basis ofturnover, in accordance with Article 2 (5) of the Basic Regulation.
(16)With regard to the remaining aspects concerning the determina-tion of the export price, in the absence of any new argumentraised by the interested parties, the methodology and the findingsas described in recitals 19 to 21 of the Provisional Regulation areconfirmed.
3.Comparison
(17)In the absence of any new argument raised by the interested
parties, the methodology and the findings made with regard to thecomparison between the export price and the normal value as
described in recitals 22 to 25 of the Provisional Regulation are
confirmed.
4.Dumping margins
(18)As set out in recital 27 of the Provisional Regulation, a single
dumping margin was allocated to the two Polish exporters whichare both related to the same importer in the Community, in orderto preclude the possibility that future exports to the Communitymight be channelled through the company having the lowermargin. The single dumping margin applicable to both Polish
exporters concerned was calculated on the basis of the weighted
average of the individual dumping margins found for eachcompany.
(19)As aresult of the revision of the methodology provisiona lly usedto weigh the two margins, the definitive single dumping margin tobe applied to both companies amounts to 5,9 % instead of 6,3 %.
(20)As regards the dumping margins found for the Polish exporters inthe sample, namely the margin applicable to cooperatingexporters not investigated and the margin applicable to non-cooperating exporters not investigated, in the absence of any newargument, the methodology and findings as set out in recitals 26
and 28 to 31 of the Provisional Regulation are confirmed.
(21)In view of the above, the definitive dumping margins are as
follows:
1. Investigated companies included in the sample:
— P.P.H.i.U. Eldagran, Slawoborze 4,9 %— Intur-Kfs, Spolkaz o.o., Inowrocla w 9,7 %— Z.P.H. Palettenwerk Kazimierz Kozik, Bystra
Podhalanska 4,0 %1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 4
▼B
— RSP Rzecko, Choszczno 0,0 %
— Sabelmar Import-Export, Konczyce Male 9,8 %— Paletex, Roman Panasiuk, Warszawa 9,8 %— Tor-Pal, Spolka z o.o., Kwidzyn 0,0 %— Z.P.P.D., ZielonaGora 10,6 %.2. Individually treated companies (PPHU Alpa,
Spolka z o.o., Dobrzyca and PPHU Palimex, Spolkaz o.o., Wloszakowice) 5,9 %.
3. Cooperating companies not investigated 6,3 %.
4. Non-cooperating companies 10,6 %.
E.DETERMINATION OF THE COMMUNITY INDUSTRY
(22)As no new arguments were received in connection with the
definition of the Community industry as set out in recital 32 of the
Provisional Regulation, the qualification of the complainingindustry as the Community industry for the purposes of thecurrent investigation is confirmed.
F.INJURY
(23)A main submission with regard to injury was received from two
related Polish exporters. They claimed that the Commission only
analysed the changes in consumption between the beginning and
the end of the period covered by the examination of injury, thusnot taking into account the variations which had occurredbetween 1992 and the IP. According to these exporters, thetrends concerning consumption and other injury factors such assales, market share and production, observed between 1992 and
the IP, corroborated the fact that the Community industry did not
suffer any injury.
(24)As a matter of principle it should be recalled that in anti-dumpinginvestigations the time period on which the analysis and thedetermination of injury is based covers a period of several years.As mentioned in recital 6 of the Provisional Regulation, in theinvestigation at issue this period covered the time from 1 January
1991 to the end of the IP, namely 31 December 1994.
As set out in recitals 51 to 53 of the Provisional Regulation, injury
has been assessed and determined in the light of the evidenceavailable for the period covering the analysis of injury by
considering the development and trends of the various injury
factors throughout this entire period.
(25)The analysis of injury has shown that dumped imports havecontinuously increased both in absolute terms (+ 87 %) as well asin terms of Community market share (+ 83 %) from 1991 to theIP (1994).
(26)As regards prices, it has been found that Polish pallet pricesdecreased significantly over the above period, i.e. by 26 %.
Furthermore, during the IP an average price undercutting level of
14 % was found to exist.
(27)As far as the situation of the Community industry is concerned,the investigation has shown that all the injury factors investigatedand analysed in detail, namely sales, production, capacityutilization, market share, profitability, price trends and employ-ment have continuously deteriorated since 1991.
The imports under investigation therefore had a considerable
impact on both the Community market and the Communityindustry. As mentioned in recital 51 of the Provisional Regulationthis conclusion was reached despite the fact that the Communityindustry's production, capacity utilization and sales improved1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 5
▼B
from 1993 up to the IP due to the fact that this improvement was
only the result of arecovery of Community consumption ba ck tothe level prevailing in 1991. Other factors, notably the
development of the Community industry's market shares, prices
and profitability, clearly showed a negative trend which can onlybe explained by the existence of the dumped imports. Theargument raised by the Polish exporters could therefore not beaccepted.
(28)As there is no concrete or positive evidence which would allowthe modification of the provisional conclusion made by theCommission whereby the Community industry had sufferedmaterial injury within the meaning of Article 3 of the BasicRegulation, this conclusion is confirmed.
G.CAUSATION OF INJURY
(29)As far as the analysis of the causal link between dumping and
injury is concerned, the abovementioned Polish exporters claimed
that this analysis was not consistently based on data relating to the
whole Community.
In this respect reference is made to recitals 54 to 69 of the
Provisional Regulation where it was established that a causal linkbetween dumping and injury existed on a Community-wide level.The Provisional Regulation also pointed out that the aforemen-tioned conclusion had been reinforced and confirmed by a moredetailed and thorough analysis carried out in specific Member
States referred to as ‘selected markets’ in the Provisional
Regulation. This analysis clearly showed that the claim madeby these two exporters could not, therefore, be accepted.
(30)In the absence of any further argument, the findings set out in theProvisional Regulation are confirmed indicating that in accor-
dance with Article 3 (6) of the Basic Regulation dumped imports
have caused material injury to the Community industry.
H.COMMUNITY INTEREST
(31)As no new arguments were received in connection with the
Community interest analysis made in the Provisional Regulation,the provisional findings are confirmed.
I.ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
(32)Based on the above conclusions on dumping, injury, causal link
and Community interest, it was considered what form and level ofanti-dumping measures would have to be taken in order to removethe trade-distorting effects of injurious dumping and to restore
effective competitive conditions on the Community market.
(33)Since the level of prices at which the injurious effects of the
imports would be removed was higher than the dumping marginsfound in the investigation, the level of the measures should bebased on the dumping margins.
(34)As already mentioned in recital 2, the Commission has, at theprovisional stage of the investigation, accepted undertakingspursuant to Article 8 of the Basic Regulation in respect of theEUR pallet. Pursuant to these undertakings, the Polish exportershave, inter alia, offered not to sell EUR pallets below a certain
minimum price. The undertakings also contain strict monitoring
provisions. Furthermore, it will be recalled that exports of pallettypes other than the EUR pallet made by exporters from which anundertaking was accepted as well as all other exports of theproduct concerned to the Community made by other exporterswere subject to a provisional anti-dumping duty.
(35)It is now definitively confirmed that the combined effect of theundertakings and the anti-dumping duty is considered sufficient toremove the injurious effects of dumping. Since the investigationhas now been concluded, definitive anti-dumping duties will beimposed in case of violation or withdrawal of an undertaking1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 6
▼B
given by any exporter. The level of the duty for the EUR-pallet
type in case of such breach or violation would be the same as theduty applicable to imports of other types of pallet.
(36)On the above basis, and, where applicable, in parallel withundertakings accepted, definitive duties, in the form of advalorem duties, should be imposed.
J.NEW EXPORTERS
(37)As already mentioned in recital 3 above, the Commission, by
Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 amending the Provisional Regula-tion, allocated the weighted average duty imposed on cooperatingexporters not investigated to a number of genuine new exporters.
By that Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 the Commission accepted
undertakings with regard to EUR pallets from some of these newexporters, thus exempting them from any provisional duty withregard to that type of pallet.
This treatment of genuine new exporters is definitively
confirmed.
(38)In the meantime, the Commission has received further applica-tions from allegedly new exporters. Those applicants whichprovided sufficient evidence showing that they are genuine new
exporters should be made subject to the weighted average
definitive duty. Furthermore, the new exporters from which theCommission has accepted an undertaking under CommissionDecision 97/797/EC(
1) should be exempted from any anti-
dumping duty with regard to that type of pallet.
(39)A provision should be included in this Regulation whereby,through an amendment thereto, any genuine new exporters whomay come forward in the future should be made subject to theweighted average duty and should be exempted from any duty incases where the Commission accepts undertakings from thoseexporters.
K.COLLECTION OF THE PROVISIONAL DUTIES
(40)In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found for the
exporting producers and in the light of the seriousness of injury
caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that
the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping dutiesshould be definitively collected at the level of the definitive dutiesfor newly produced flat pallets of wood originating in Poland.Amounts secured in excess of the level of the definitive duties andamounts secured for repaired, used and loaded pallets should be
released,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
1. A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of
new flat pallets of wood falling within CN code ex 4415 20 20 (Tariccode: 4415 20 20*10), originating in Poland. This duty shall not apply toimports of used and of repaired flat pallets of wood.
Flat pallets of wood which are loaded with other goods for the purpose
of importing those goods into the Community shall be treated as usedpallets provided that the goods in question are the main purpose of theimport and that the pallets represent only a minor proportion of the total
value of the goods imported.
2. The rate of definitive anti-dumping duties applicable to the net,
free-at-Community frontier prices, before duty, shall be as follows:1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 7
(1) See page 36 of this Official Journal.
▼B
Manufacturer Rate of dutyTaric Addi-
tional Code
Zielonogorskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu
Drzewnego, PL-65-950 ZielonaGora 10,6 % 8013
Firma ‘Sabelmar’ — Leszek Sabela, PL-43-
525 Konczyce Male 9,8 % 8014
P.P.H.U. ‘Alpa’ Sp. z o.o., PL-76-038 Dobr-
zyca5,9 % 8015
P.P.H.U. ‘Palimex’ Sp. z o.o., PL-64-140
Wloszakowice 5,9 % 8015
P.W. ‘Intur-KFS’ Sp. z o.o., PL-88-100 Inow-
roclaw 9,7 % 8016
‘Paletex’ Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk,
PL-01-601 Warszawa 9,8 % 8014
Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyji Handlu I Uslug
S.C. ‘Eldagran’,
Mr M. Zeminski, PL-78-314 Slawoborze 4,9 % 8017
►M3Z.P.H. ‘Pallettenwerk’ — K. Kozik,
PL-34-785 Jordanow ◄ 4,0 % 8018
Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjno Handlowe,
‘Tor-Pal’ Sp. z o.o., PL-82-500 Kwidzyn 0 % 8020
RolniczaSpoldzielniaProdukcyjnaRzecko,
PL-73-200 Choszczno 0 % 8020
Companies listed in Annex I to this Regulation 6,3 % 8019
Others 10,6 % 8900
3. Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning
customs duties shall apply.
Article 2
Notwithstanding Article 1, the duties shall not apply to imports of one
specific pallet type, namely the EUR pallet, being a flat pallet of wood,
marked by the registered mark ‘EUR’ and the initials of the approvingrailway, manufactured, exported to the Community and invoiced tobuyers established in the Community by the companies listed in AnnexII to this Regulation in respect of which undertakings have beenaccepted by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 and Commission
Decision 97/797/EC.
Article 3
The amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty under
Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 shall be definitively collected at the dutyrates definitively imposed. Amounts secured in excess of the definitive
rate of anti-dumping duty and amounts secured for repaired, used and
loaded pallets shall be released.
Article 4
1. Where any party provides sufficient evidence to the Commission
that:
— it did not export to the Community or produce the goods described in
Article 1 (1) during the investigation period,1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 8
▼B
— it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in the exporting
country which are subject to the anti-dumping duties imposed by thisRegulation,
— it has actually exported to the Community the goods concerned after
the investigation period, or it has entered into an irrevocable
contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the
Community,
then the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal submitted by
the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, may amendthis Regulation by adding that party to the list of companies in Annex I.
2. Where the Commission accepts undertakings with regard to the
EUR pallet from any party mentioned in paragraph 1 with regard to the
EUR pallet, the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal
submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,may amend this Regulation by adding that party to the list of companiesin Annex II.
Article 5
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its
publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities .
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in
all Member States.1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 9
▼M4
ANNEX I
Manufacturer
1 ‘Baumann Palety’ Sp. z o.o., Barczewo2 ‘DAST’ GmbH, Poznan3 Drew-Pol Export-Import, Wodarz Norbert, Murow
4 E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S.C., Snietnica
5 F.P.H. ‘Tina’ S.C., Katowice6 F.P.H. Tadeusz Fisher, Maly Gleboczek7 F.P.U.H. ‘Rol-Mar’, Adam Piatek, Klodzko
8 Z.P.H.U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa
9 Internationale Paletten Company Sp., Lebork
10 ‘Kross-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Kolobrzeg11 P.P.U.H. ‘Drewmax’ Sp.zo.o. (formerly P.P.H. ‘Drewnex’), Krakow
12 P.P.H. ‘GKT’ S.C., Bilgoraj
13 P.P.H. ‘Pamadex’, Ligota14 P.P.H. ‘Unikat’, Aleksandrow IV 69715 P.P.H.U. ‘Adapol’ S.C., Wolomin16 P.P.U.H. ‘Alwa’ Sp.zo.o., Slawno
17 P.P.U.H. ‘SMS’ — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno
18 P.T.H. ‘Mirex’, Kolobrzeg19 P.W. ‘Peteco’ Sp.zo.o., Warszawa20 Parafia Rzymsko-Katolicka, B. Niepokalaneg Dzialalnose Gospo-
daroza, Nowy Sacz
21 Produkcja Palet ‘A. Adamus’, Kuznia Grabowska22 Produkcja Skup Palet Drewnanych, Stanislaw Lachowicz, Majdan
Sieniawski 170
23 Przedsiebiorstwo ‘Amesko’, Andrzej Skora, Trzebnica24 P.H.U. ‘Justyna’, Gubin
25 P.H.U. ‘Akropol’, Krakow
26 P.H.U. Produkcyjne ‘Lech’, Lech Szwez, Zary27 Przedsiebiorstwo Obrobki Drewna ‘Palet-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Dabrowka
WLKP
28 P.P.H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal29 P.P.H.U. ‘AWA’ Sp.zo.o., Nowy Sacz30 Przedsiebiorstwo Wielobranzowe, Zdziolaw Milocki, Ostroda31 ‘Scanproduct’ SA., Czarny Dunajec1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 10
▼M4
32 S.C. ‘Bed’, Dariusz Zuk, Krasienin
33 S.U.T.R. ‘Rol Trak’, Prochowice34 Stolarstwo Export-Import, Tadeusz Swirski, Dlugopole Zdroj35 Torunskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu Drzewnego w Toruniu, Adam
Wisniewski, Torun
36 ‘Transdrewneks’ Sp.zo.o., Grudziadz-Owczarki37 W.Z.P.U.M. ‘Euro-Tech’, Rakszawa38 Wytwazanie Skrzyn i Opakowan Drewnianych, Malgorzata i Ryszard
Nowak, Piaszyna
39 Zaklad Produkcyjny Bohuszko, Ryszard Bohuszko, Osno40 Z.P.H. ‘Maw’ S.C., Andrzej Kulej, Lubomierz41 Zaklad Uslugowo-Handlowy ‘Rolmex’, E. Cackowski, Lipno42 Zaklad Wielobranzowy Produkcyjno Uslugowy, Ryszard Potoniec,
Muszyna
43 Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S.C., Drawsko Pomorskie44 Zphu ‘Drewex’ SC., Agnieszka Pawlaczyk, Skwierzyna
45 Z.P.H.U. ‘Sek-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Tarnobrzeg
46 ‘Euro-Mega-Plus’ Sp.zo.o., Kielce47 ‘C.M.C.’ Sp.zo.o., Andrychow, Inwald48 Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV
704
49 Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gerka, Brodnica50 Z.P.H.U. ‘Drewnex’ Mamos, Luczak, Mamos s.j., Cekow51 Import-Export ‘Elko’ Sp.zo.o., Kalisz52 P.P.H.U. ‘Probox’, Import-Export, Kalisz53 Drewpal sp.j., Blizanow
54 Zaman S.C., Radom
55 ‘Marimpex’, Pulawy56 ‘AVEN’ Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn57 P.P.H.U. ‘Eurex’ BIS, Godynice58 P.H. ‘Drewex’ S.C., Lebork59 MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko60 ENKEL S.C., Pulawy61 PAL-PACK Sp.zo.o., Wierzchowo62 ProdukcjaStola rskaPosrednictwo Export-Import, W.i.T.
HENSOLDT, Lebork1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 11
▼M4
63 Biuro Uslugowo-Handlowe, Wieslaw Rzezniczek, Lebork
64 P.P.U.H. ‘DREWPOL’, Braszewice
65 PTN Kruklanki Sp.zo.o., Krulanki66 WEDAM S.C., Stezyca67 Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow
68 Zaklad Produkcyjny ‘Tarta’, Lubsko
69 Firma‘Kra usdrew’, Cewice70 ‘Lidal’ S.C., Miastko71 Zaklad Przerobu Drewna Import-Export, Stanislaw Kociolek, Ladek
Zdroj
72 P.P.H.U. ‘Alk’, Bierzwnik73 ‘Empol’ S.C., Jastrzebniki 3774 Zaklad Produkcji Drzewnej Nr. 1, Export-Import, Julian Bartkowski,
Sanok
75 P.P.H. ‘Drewex’, Czarnkow76 ‘ZAP’ Przedsiebiorstwo Handlowe-Uslugowe Sp.C., Wschowa
77 P.P.H.U. ‘Opal’, Zygmunt Podgorski, Bukowsko 41
78 ‘Algepa-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Lubsko79 P.P.H. ‘A-Produkt’ S.C., Resko80 PPH ‘Paletex’ Sibinski Jaroslaw, Czajkow
81 Euro-Handels Sp.zo.o., Szczecin
82 Firma‘KIKO’ S.C., Pozna n83 ‘Enkel’ Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy84 SliwkaLucyna , Klodzko
85 FirmaBorkowski S.C. Export-Import, Gra bow n. Prosna
86 Produkcja — Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow87 ‘Prodpalet’ Handel, Boleslawiec88 Z.P.H.U. ‘Drexport’ S.C., Olecko, Osiedle Lesk
89 ‘Bilusa’ Sp.zo.o., Klodawa
90 Pawel Bilko ‘Pablo’, Klodawa91 Z.P.W. ‘Gober’ Sp.zo.o., Gorzow Wlkp.92 Kisiel Malgorzata ‘Drew-Pal’, Dobra Now93 P.W. ‘Remag’, Zlocieniec
94 P.P.U.H. PAL-POL S.C., Prabuty
95 Firma‘A.C.S.’ S.C., Ka mien1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 12
▼M4
96 B.H. ‘MARINO’, Drawsko Pomorskie
97 P.T.P.U.H. ‘ROB-POL’, Milkow
98 Z.H.U.P. Agromal, Sieradz99 ‘SMT’ Sp.zo.o., Miastko
100 Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni, Torun
101 Artur Rochmankowski, Trzcinsko-Zdroj
102 ‘Depo’ Sp.zo.o., Ilowa103 B.P.R. Sp.zo.o., Warszawa104 ‘DREWNO’ Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn
105 P.P.H. ‘Astra’ Sp.zo.o., Nawojowa
106 ‘D & M & D’ Sp.zo.o., Blizanow107 P.P.H. ‘Vector’, Kalisz108 ‘Palko’ Sp.zo.o., Sedziszow109 P.P.H. Pol-Wood S.C., Rzekun
110 PPH ‘YANSAM’, Zlocieniec
111 P.P.H.U. ‘ELMA’ S.C., Sobieseki112 PPH SWENDEX S.C., Lublin113 P.P.H.U. ROMAX Import-Eksport, Wroclaw
114 Z.P.H.U. ‘BESTPOL’ Sp. z o.o., Lututow
115 P.P.H.U. Zbigniew Marek, Andrichow116 Pomorski Serwis Paletowy Sp. z o.o., Kobylnica117 ‘EMI’ S.C., Bilgoraj
118 P.P.H.U. ‘Wal-Trans’ Waldemar Latka, Jelenia Gora
119 P.P.D.B. ‘Lesnik’ S.C., Krosno120 ‘EUROPAL’ S.C., Brzeziny121 P.P.U.H. ‘CENTROPAL’ EKSPORT-IMPORT, Czajkow
122 Energomontaz Polnoc Serwis Sp. zo.o., Swierze Gorne
123 P.P.H.U. Jerzy Florczyk, Ruciane Nida124 Paletten-Systeme Sp.zo.o., Grabow n.Prosna125 ARBOR S.C., Trzebnica126 P.P.H. ‘BOM'S’ S-kazo.o., Suwa lki
127 P.P.H.U. Futex. Stargard Szczecinski
128 PALDREW Henryk Bednarski, Czarne129 P.P.H.U. ‘Marco-Drew’ S.C., Stargard Szczecinski1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 13
▼M4
130 ‘Tilia’, Szczecin
131 ‘Tartak — Domaszkow’, Domaszkow1997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 14
▼M4
ANNEX II
Manufacturer
TARIC addi-
tional code
1 ‘Baumann Palety’ Sp. z o.o., Barczewo 8570
2 E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S.C., Snietnica 8571
3 F.P.H. ‘Tina’ S.C., Katowice 85724 Firma ‘Sabelmar’ S.C., Konczyce Male 85735 Z.P.H.U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa 8574
6 ‘Kross-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Kolobrzeg 8576
7 P.P.H. ‘GKT’ S.C., Bilgoraj 85848 P.P.H. ‘Unikat’, Aleksandrow IV 697 85869 P.P.H.U. ‘Adapol’ S.C., Wolomin 8587
10 P.P.H.U. ‘Alpa’ Sp.zo.o., Dobrzyca 8588
11 P.P.U.H. ‘Alwa’ Sp.zo.o., Slawno 858912 P.P.H.U. ‘Palimex’ Sp.zo.o., Wloszakowice 859013 P.P.U.H. ‘SMS’ — St. Mrozowicz, Sulec-
zyno8591
14 P.T.H. ‘Mirex’, Kolobrzeg 8597
15 P.W. ‘Intur-KFS’ Sp.zo.o., Inowroclaw 866216 P.W. ‘Peteco’ Sp.zo.o., Warszawa 8690
17 ‘Paletex’ Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk,
Warszawa8691
18 Produkcja Palet ‘A. Adamus’, Kuznia
Grabowska8692
19 P.P.H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal 8693
20 ‘Scanproduct’ SA., Czarny Dujanec 8715
21 ‘Transdrewneks’ Sp.zo.o., Grudziadz-
Owczarki8716
22 W.Z.P.U.M. ‘Euro-Tech’, Rakszawa 8725
23 Z.P.H. ‘Palettenwerk’ — K. Kozik,
Jordanow8726
24 Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S.C., Drawsko
Pomorskie8745
25 Z.P.H.U. ‘Sek-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Tarnobrzeg 8526
26 ‘Euro-Mega-Plus’ Sp.zo.o., Kielce 8527
27 ‘C.M.C.’ Sp.zo.o., Andrychow, Inwald 8528
28 Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolod-
ziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV 70485291997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 15
▼M4
TARIC addi-
tional code
29 Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian
Gerka, Brodnica8530
30 Z.P.H.U. ‘Drewnex’ Mamos, Luczak,
Mamos s.j., Cekow8531
31 Import-Export ‘Elko’ Sp.zo.o., Kalisz 8532
32 P.P.H.U. ‘Probox’, Import-Export, Kalisz 8533
33 Drewpal sp.j., Blizanow 8534
34 Zaman S.C., Radom 853535 ‘Marimpex’, Pulawy 8537
36 ‘AVEN’ Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn 8558
37 P.P.H.U. ‘Eurex’ BIS, Godynice 853838 ENKEL S.C., Pulawy 854039 ProdukcjaStola rskaPosrednictwo Export-
Import, W.i.T. HENSOLDT, Lebork8541
40 P.P.U.H. ‘DREWPOL’, Braszewice 8834
41 PTN Kruklanki Sp.zo.o., Krulanki 8556
42 WEDAM S.C., Stezyca8557
43 Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow 855944 P.P.H.U. ‘Alk’, Bierzwnik 8561
45 ‘Empol’ S.C., Jastrzebniki 37 8560
46 Euro-Handels Sp.zo.o., Szczecin 844047 PPH ‘Paletex’ Sibinski Jaroslaw, Czajkow 844148 Firma‘KIKO’ S.C., Pozna n 8443
49 ‘Enkel’ Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy 8444
50 FirmaBorkowski S.C. Export-Import,
Grabow n. Prosna8446
51 ‘Bilusa’ Sp.zo.o., Klodawa 8484
52 P.P.U.H. PAL-POL S.C., Prabuty 848553 Firma‘A.C.S.’ S.C., Ka mien 848654 ‘SMT’ Sp.zo.o., Miastko 8562
55 Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni,
Torun8563
56 ‘Palko’ Sp.zo.o., Sedziszow 8565
57 ‘D & M & D’ Sp.zo.o., Blizanow 856658 P.P.H. ‘Vector’, Kalisz 85671997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 16
▼M4
TARIC addi-
tional code
59 P.P.H.U. ‘ELMA’ S.C., Sobieseki A109
60 PPH SWENDEX S.C., Lublin A110
61 P.P.H.U. Zbigniew Marek, Andrichow A113
62 Pomorski Serwis Paletowy Sp. z o.o., Kobyl-
nicaA114
63 ‘EMI’ S.C., Bilgoraj A124
64 P.P.H.U. ROMAX Import-Eksport, Wroclaw A13365 P.P.D.B. ‘Lesnik’ S.C., Krosno A25966 ‘EUROPAL’ S.C., Brzeziny A260
67 P.P.U.H. ‘CENTROPAL’ EKSPORT-
IMPORT, CzajkowA261
68 Energomontaz Polnoc Serwis Sp.zo.o.,
Swierze GorneA262
69 P.P.H. ‘BOM'S’ S-kazo.o., Suwa lki A2631997R2334 — EN — 24.08.2001 — 004.001 — 17