1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 1
This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
►B COUNCILREGULATION(EC)No2334/97
of24November1997
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of flat pallets of wood originating in
theRepublicofPolandandcollecting definitively theprovisionaldutyimposed
(OJ L 324, 27.11.1997, p. 1)
Amended by:
Official Journal
No page date
►M1 Council Regulation (EC) No 2079/98 of 24 September 1998 L 266 1 1.10.1998
►M2 Council Regulation (EC) No 2048/1999 of 27 September 1999 L 255 1 30.9.1999
►M3 Council Regulation (EC) No 1521/2000 of 10 July 2000 L 175 1 14.7.2000
►M4 Council Regulation (EC) No 1678/2001 of 13 August 2001 L 227 22 23.8.2001
►M5 Council Regulation (EC) No 1012/2002 of 10 June 2002 L 155 11 14.6.2002
Corrected by:
►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 221, 1.9.2000, p. 27 (1521/2000)
▼B
COUNCILREGULATION(EC)No2334/97
of24November1997
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of flat
palletsofwoodoriginatingintheRepublicofPolandandcollecting
definitively theprovisionaldutyimposed
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December
1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries notmembers of the European Community (
1), and in particular Articles 9
(4) and 10 (2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal presented by the Commission after
consulting the Advisory Committee,
Whereas:
A.PROVISIONALMEASURES
(1) The Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 (2) (hereinafter
referred to as the Provisional Regulation) imposed provisionalduties on certain imports into the Community of flat pallets ofwood falling within CN code ex 4415 20 20 and originating inPoland. In addition, undertakings offered by certain exporters in
connection with those imports were accepted by the Provisional
Regulation. The product scope of these undertakings was limitedto a certain type of flat pallets of wood, i.e. EUR-pallets.
(2) By Regulation (EC) No 1632/97 (3), the Commission amended
the Provisional Regulation by adding a provision whereby
genuine new Polish exporters can be allocated the weightedaverage duty applicable to cooperating companies not includedin the sample of exporters investigated and can have undertak-ings accepted with regard to exports of EUR-pallets.
(3) By Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 (4), pursuant to the abovemen-
tioned new provision, the Commission further amended theProvisional Regulation by including a number of genuine newexporters in the list of companies receiving the weighted averageduty and by accepting undertakings from some of these new
exporters.
B.SUBSEQUENTPROCEDURE
(4) Following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties,
several interested parties submitted comments in writing. Theparties who so requested were granted an opportunity to beheard by the Commission. The Commission continued to seekand verify all the information it deemed necessary for the
purpose of its definitive findings.
(5) Parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations
on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposi-tion of definitive anti-dumping duties and the definitivecollection of amounts secured by way of provisional subsequent
to this disclosure.
(6) The comments submitted by the interested parties were duly
examined and, where deemed appropriate, taken into account inmaking the definitive findings.1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 2
(1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No
2331/96 (OJ L 317, 6. 12. 1996, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 150, 7. 6. 1997, p. 4.
(3) OJ L 225, 15. 8. 1997, p. 11.
(4) OJ L 225, 15. 8. 1997, p. 13.
▼B
C.PRODUCTCONCERNEDANDLIKEPRODUCT
(7) According to recitals (8) and (9) of the Provisional Regulation
the product under consideration is flat wooden pallets, fallingunder CN code ex 4415 20 20 and originating in Poland.
It appeared that the provisional anti-dumping duty on wooden
pallets was not applied consistently by the customs authorities.For example, while some customs offices applied the provisional
anti-dumping duty on used and repaired pallets, others did not. It
was also reported that the anti-dumping duty had in some casesbeen applied to pallets when they were loaded with other goodsfor the purpose of importing these goods into the Community.
(8) Despite the fact that used and repaired pallets have a similar useand physical characteristics closely resembling the productconcerned, i.e. newly produced pallets, the investigation hasshown that newly produced pallets on the one hand and usedand repaired pallets on the other hand differ substantially interms of the perception by potential pallet users and channels
through which they are usually sold.
(9) On the basis of the foregoing, it is concluded that used and
repaired pallets cannot be considered to be like products inaccordance with Article 1 (4) of the Basic Regulation and there-
fore these pallets are not covered by the scope of the current
investigation. It follows that anti-dumping measures should notapply to used and repaired pallets but only to imports of newlyproduced flat wooden pallets originating in Poland.
In addition, as regards flat pallets of wood originating in Poland
which are loaded with other goods for the purpose of importing
these goods into the Community, the Commission is of the
opinion that these should be treated as used pallets providedthat the pallets represent only a minor proportion of the totalvalue of the loaded goods imported.
D.DUMPING
1.Normalvalue
(10) As set out in recital 16 of the Provisional Regulation, in
constructing normal values for pallets other than the EUR-pallet,
the weighted average profit margin relating to domestic sales
found for two investigated companies which had representativeand profitable domestic sales was used for other Polish exportersnot having made representative and/or profitable domestic sales,in accordance with Article 2 (6) (a) of the Basic Regulation.
(11) Two of these other Polish exporters claimed that the domesticsales used as a basis for determining this weighted average profitmargin might not be representative due to circumstances whichare specific to the two companies having made these sales and
which might thus have generated exceptionally high profit
levels. However, the investigation has shown that the sales usedto calculate the weighted average profit margin have been madein sufficient quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, andthat the resulting profit margin can be considered to reasonablyreflect the actual amounts of profit realized on the Polish market.
(12) With regard to the remaining aspects of normal value, in theabsence of any new argument raised by the interested parties,the methodology and the findings as described in recitals 16 to18 of the Provisional Regulation are confirmed.
2.Exportprice
(13) Following disclosure of the provisional findings, two Polish
exporters, for whom export prices have been constructed inaccordance with Article 2 (9) of the Basic Regulation, and theirrelated importer in the Community have claimed that the adjust-ments made for selling, general and administrative (SG& A)1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 3
▼B
expenses and profit were excessive in respect of the amounts
actually attributed to the product under investigation.
(14) As regards profits, the Commission has re-examined the issueand has sought additional information and evidence from inde-pendent importers of wooden pallets on profits made in the
investigation period, i.e. the calendar year 1994 (hereinafter
referred to as the ‘IP’). As a result of this re-examination thefindings made for the purpose of the provisional measures areconfirmed and, therefore, retained as definitive findings.
(15) In the Provisional Regulation, the amount of SG& A expenseswas determined by allocating these expenses to the productconcerned on the basis of turnover. This allocation key wasused in the absence of a specific, historically utilized allocation
or any other more appropriate method. The company also agreed
to this approach during the on-the-spot verification. Afterwardsthe importer proposed a different allocation of SG& A expensesbased on an estimated apportionment of all cost items to theproduct concerned and other activities of the company. However,
given that it has not been shown that the new allocation method
has been historically used, the claim had to be rejected andpreference given to the allocation of costs on the basis of turn-over, in accordance with Article 2 (5) of the Basic Regulation.
(16) With regard to the remaining aspects concerning the determina-tion of the export price, in the absence of any new argumentraised by the interested parties, the methodology and the findingsas described in recitals 19 to 21 of the Provisional Regulation
are confirmed.
3.Comparison
(17) In the absence of any new argument raised by the interested
parties, the methodology and the findings made with regard to
the comparison between the export price and the normal valueas described in recitals 22 to 25 of the Provisional Regulationare confirmed.
4.Dumpingmargins
(18) As set out in recital 27 of the Provisional Regulation, a single
dumping margin was allocated to the two Polish exporters whichare both related to the same importer in the Community, in order
to preclude the possibility that future exports to the Community
might be channelled through the company having the lowermargin. The single dumping margin applicable to both Polishexporters concerned was calculated on the basis of the weightedaverage of the individual dumping margins found for eachcompany.
(19) As a result of the revision of the methodology provisionally usedto weigh the two margins, the definitive single dumping margin
to be applied to both companies amounts to 5,9 % instead of
6,3 %.
(20) As regards the dumping margins found for the Polish exportersin the sample, namely the margin applicable to cooperatingexporters not investigated and the margin applicable to non-cooperating exporters not investigated, in the absence of anynew argument, the methodology and findings as set out in reci-tals 26 and 28 to 31 of the Provisional Regulation are confirmed.
(21) In view of the above, the definitive dumping margins are asfollows:
1. Investigated companies included in the sample:
— P.P.H.i.U. Eldagran, Slawoborze 4,9 %— Intur-Kfs, Spolka z o.o., Inowroclaw 9,7 %— Z.P.H. Palettenwerk Kazimierz Kozik, Bystra
Podhalanska 4,0 %1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 4
▼B
— RSP Rzecko, Choszczno 0,0 %
— Sabelmar Import-Export, Konczyce Male 9,8 %— Paletex, Roman Panasiuk, Warszawa 9,8 %— Tor-Pal, Spolka z o.o., Kwidzyn 0,0 %— Z.P.P.D., Zielona Gora 10,6 %.2. Individually treated companies (PPHU Alpa,
Spolka z o.o., Dobrzyca and PPHU Palimex, Spolkaz o.o., Wloszakowice) 5,9 %.
3. Cooperating companies not investigated 6,3 %.
4. Non-cooperating companies 10,6 %.
E.DETERMINATIONOFTHECOMMUNITYINDUSTRY
(22) As no new arguments were received in connection with the defi-
nition of the Community industry as set out in recital 32 of the
Provisional Regulation, the qualification of the complainingindustry as the Community industry for the purposes of thecurrent investigation is confirmed.
F.INJURY
(23) A main submission with regard to injury was received from two
related Polish exporters. They claimed that the Commission only
analysed the changes in consumption between the beginning and
the end of the period covered by the examination of injury, thusnot taking into account the variations which had occurredbetween 1992 and the IP. According to these exporters, thetrends concerning consumption and other injury factors such assales, market share and production, observed between 1992 and
the IP, corroborated the fact that the Community industry did not
suffer any injury.
(24) As a matter of principle it should be recalled that in anti-dumping investigations the time period on which the analysisand the determination of injury is based covers a period ofseveral years. As mentioned in recital 6 of the Provisional Regu-lation, in the investigation at issue this period covered the time
from 1 January 1991 to the end of the IP, namely 31 December
1994.
As set out in recitals 51 to 53 of the Provisional Regulation,
injury has been assessed and determined in the light of the
evidence available for the period covering the analysis of injury
by considering the development and trends of the various injuryfactors throughout this entire period.
(25) The analysis of injury has shown that dumped imports havecontinuously increased both in absolute terms (+ 87 %) as wellas in terms of Community market share (+ 83 %) from 1991 tothe IP (1994).
(26) As regards prices, ithas been found t hatPolish palletprices
decreased significantly over the above period, i.e. by 26 %.
Furthermore, during the IP an average price undercutting levelof 14 % was found to exist.
(27) As far as the situation of the Community industry is concerned,the investigation has shown that all the injury factors investi-gated and analysed in detail, namely sales, production, capacityutilization, market share, profitability, price trends and employ-ment have continuously deteriorated since 1991.
The imports under investigation therefore had a considerable
impact on both the Community market and the Communityindustry. As mentioned in recital 51 of the Provisional Regula-tion this conclusion was reached despite the fact that the1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 5
▼B
Community industry's production, capacity utilization and sales
improved from 1993 up to the IP due to the fact that thisimprovement was only the result of a recovery of Community
consumption back to the level prevailing in 1991. Other factors,
notably the development of the Community industry's marketshares, prices and profitability, clearly showed a negative trendwhich can only be explained by the existence of the dumpedimports. The argument raised by the Polish exporters could
therefore not be accepted.
(28) As there is no concrete or positive evidence which would allow
the modification of the provisional conclusion made by theCommission whereby the Community industry had sufferedmaterial injury within the meaning of Article 3 of the Basic
Regulation, this conclusion is confirmed.
G.CAUSATIONOFINJURY
(29) As far as the analysis of the causal link between dumping and
injury is concerned, the abovementioned Polish exporters
claimed that this analysis was not consistently based on datarelating to the whole Community.
In this respect reference is made to recitals 54 to 69 of the Provi-
sional Regulation where it was established that a causal linkbetween dumping and injury existed on a Community-widelevel. The Provisional Regulation also pointed out that the afore-mentioned conclusion had been reinforced and confirmed by a
more detailed and thorough analysis carried out in specific
Member States referred to as ‘selected markets’ in the Provi-sional Regulation. This analysis clearly showed that the claimmade by these two exporters could not, therefore, be accepted.
(30) In the absence of any further argument, the findings set out in
the Provisional Regulation are confirmed indicating that in
accordance with Article 3 (6) of the Basic Regulation dumpedimports have caused material injury to the Community industry.
H.COMMUNITYINTEREST
(31) As no new arguments were received in connection with the
Community interest analysis made in the Provisional Regulation,the provisional findings are confirmed.
I.ANTI-DUMPINGMEASURES
(32) Based on the above conclusions on dumping, injury, causal link
and Community interest, it was considered what form and levelof anti-dumping measures would have to be taken in order to
remove the trade-distorting effects of injurious dumping and to
restore effective competitive conditions on the Communitymarket.
(33) Since the level of prices at which the injurious effects of theimports would be removed was higher than the dumping margins
found in the investigation, the level of the measures should be
based on the dumping margins.
(34) As already mentioned in recital 2, the Commission has, at theprovisional stage of the investigation, accepted undertakingspursuant to Article 8 of the Basic Regulation in respect of the
EUR pallet. Pursuant to these undertakings, the Polish exporters
have, inter alia, offered not to sell EUR pallets below a certainminimum price. The undertakings also contain strict monitoringprovisions. Furthermore, it will be recalled that exports of pallettypes other than the EUR pallet made by exporters from whichan undertaking was accepted as well as all other exports of the
product concerned to the Community made by other exporters
were subject to a provisional anti-dumping duty.
(35) It is now definitively confirmed that the combined effect of theundertakings and the anti-dumping duty is considered sufficientto remove the injurious effects of dumping. Since the investiga-1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 6
▼B
tion has now been concluded, definitive anti-dumping duties will
be imposed in case of violation or withdrawal of an undertakinggiven by any exporter. The level of the duty for the EUR-pallet
type in case of such breach or violation would be the same as
the duty applicable to imports of other types of pallet.
(36) On the above basis, and, where applicable, in parallel withundertakings accepted, definitive duties, in the form of advalorem duties, should be imposed.
J.NEWEXPORTERS
(37) As already mentioned in recital 3 above, the Commission, by
Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 amending the Provisional Regula-tion, allocated the weighted average duty imposed oncooperating exporters not investigated to a number of genuinenew exporters. By that Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 the
Commission accepted undertakings with regard to EUR pallets
from some of these new exporters, thus exempting them fromany provisional duty with regard to that type of pallet.
This treatment of genuine new exporters is definitively
confirmed.
(38) In the meantime, the Commission has received further applica-tions from allegedly new exporters. Those applicants which
provided sufficient evidence showing that they are genuine new
exporters should be made subject to the weighted average defini-tive duty. Furthermore, the new exporters from which theCommission has accepted an undertaking under CommissionDecision 97/797/EC (
1) should be exempted from any anti-
dumping duty with regard to that type of pallet.
(39) A provision should be included in this Regulation whereby,through an amendment thereto, any genuine new exporters who
may come forward in the future should be made subject to the
weighted average duty and should be exempted from any dutyin cases where the Commission accepts undertakings from thoseexporters.
K.COLLECTIONOFTHEPROVISIONALDUTIES
(40) In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found for the
exporting producers and in the light of the seriousness of injurycaused to the Community industry, it is considered necessarythat the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping
duties should be definitively collected at the level of the defini-
tive duties for newly produced flat pallets of wood originating inPoland. Amounts secured in excess of the level of the definitiveduties and amounts secured for repaired, used and loaded palletsshould be released,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
1. A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of
new flat pallets of wood falling within CN code ex 4415 20 20 (Tariccode: 4415 20 20*10), originating in Poland. This duty shall not applyto imports of used and of repaired flat pallets of wood.
Flat pallets of wood which are loaded with other goods for the purpose
of importing those goods into the Community shall be treated as usedpallets provided that the goods in question are the main purpose of theimport and that the pallets represent only a minor proportion of thetotal value of the goods imported.1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 7
(1) See page 36 of this Official Journal.
▼B
2. The rate of definitive anti-dumping duties applicable to the net,
free-at-Community frontier prices, before duty, shall be as follows:
Manufacturer Rate of dutyTaric Addi-
tional Code
Zielonogorskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu
Drzewnego, PL-65-950 Zielona Gora 10,6 % 8013
Firma ‘Sabelmar’ — Leszek Sabela, PL-43-
525 Konczyce Male 9,8 % 8014
P.P.H.U. ‘Alpa’ Sp. z o.o., PL-76-038 Dobr-
zyca 5,9 % 8015
P.P.H.U. ‘Palimex’ Sp. z o.o., PL-64-140
Wloszakowice 5,9 % 8015
P.W. ‘Intur-KFS’ Sp. z o.o., PL-88-100 Inow-
roclaw 9,7 % 8016
‘Paletex’ Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk,
PL-01-601 Warszawa 9,8 % 8014
Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyji Handlu I Uslug
S.C. ‘Eldagran’,
Mr M. Zeminski, PL-78-314 Slawoborze 4,9 % 8017
►M3Z.P.H. ‘Pallettenwerk’ — K. Kozik,
PL-34-785 Jordanow ◄ 4,0 % 8018
Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjno Handlowe,
‘Tor-Pal’ Sp. z o.o., PL-82-500 Kwidzyn 0 % 8020
Rolnicza Spoldzielnia Produkcyjna Rzecko,
PL-73-200 Choszczno 0 % 8020
Companies listed in Annex I to this Regula-
tion 6,3 % 8019
Others 10,6 % 8900
3. Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning
customs duties shall apply.
Article 2
Notwithstanding Article 1, the duties shall not apply to imports of one
specific pallet type, namely the EUR pallet, being a flat pallet of wood,marked by the registered mark ‘EUR’ and the initials of the approving
railway, manufactured, exported to the Community and invoiced to
buyers established in the Community by the companies listed in AnnexII to this Regulation in respect of which undertakings have beenaccepted by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 and Commis-sion Decision 97/797/EC.
Article 3
The amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty under
Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 shall be definitively collected at the dutyrates definitively imposed. Amounts secured in excess of the definitiverate of anti-dumping duty and amounts secured for repaired, used andloaded pallets shall be released.1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 8
▼B
Article 4
1. Where any party provides sufficient evidence to the Commission
that:
— it did not export to the Community or produce the goods described
in Article 1 (1) during the investigation period,
— it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in the exporting
country which are subject to the anti-dumping duties imposed bythis Regulation,
— it has actually exported to the Community the goods concerned
after the investigation period, or it has entered into an irrevocablecontractual obligation to export a significant quantity to theCommunity,
then the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal submitted by
the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, may amend
this Regulation by adding that party to the list of companies in AnnexI.
2. Where the Commission accepts undertakings with regard to the
EUR pallet from any party mentioned in paragraph 1 with regard tothe EUR pallet, the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal
submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory
Committee, may amend this Regulation by adding that party to thelistof companies in Annex II.
Article 5
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its
publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities .
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable
in all Member States.1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 9
▼M4
ANNEX I
Manufacturer
1 ‘Baumann Palety’ Sp. z o.o., Barczewo2 ‘DAST’ GmbH, Poznan3 Drew-Pol Export-Import, Wodarz Norbert, Murow
4 E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S.C., Snietnica
5 F.P.H. ‘Tina’ S.C., Katowice6 F.P.H. Tadeusz Fisher, Maly Gleboczek7 F.P.U.H. ‘Rol-Mar’, Adam Piatek, Klodzko
8 Z.P.H.U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa
9 Internationale Paletten Company Sp., Lebork
10 ‘Kross-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Kolobrzeg11 P.P.U.H. ‘Drewmax’ Sp.zo.o. (formerly P.P.H. ‘Drewnex’), Krakow
12 P.P.H. ‘GKT’ S.C., Bilgoraj
13 P.P.H. ‘Pamadex’, Ligota14 P.P.H. ‘Unikat’, Aleksandrow IV 69715 P.P.H.U. ‘Adapol’ S.C., Wolomin16 P.P.U.H. ‘Alwa’ Sp.zo.o., Slawno
17 P.P.U.H. ‘SMS’ — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno
18 P.T.H. ‘Mirex’, Kolobrzeg19 P.W. ‘Peteco’ Sp.zo.o., Warszawa20 Parafia Rzymsko-Katolicka, B. Niepokalaneg Dzialalnose Gospo-
daroza, Nowy Sacz
21 Produkcja Palet‘A. Adamus’, Kuznia Grabowska22 Produkcja Skup PaletDrewnanych, St anislaw Lachowicz, Majdan
Sieniawski 170
23 Przedsiebiorstwo ‘Amesko’, Andrzej Skora, Trzebnica24 P.H.U. ‘Justyna’, Gubin
25 P.H.U. ‘Akropol’, Krakow
26 P.H.U. Produkcyjne ‘Lech’, Lech Szwez, Zary27 Przedsiebiorstwo Obrobki Drewna ‘Palet-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Dabrowka
WLKP
28 P.P.H. ZygmuntSkibinski, Kowal29 P.P.H.U. ‘AWA’ Sp.zo.o., Nowy Sacz30 Przedsiebiorstwo Wielobranzowe, Zdziolaw Milocki, Ostroda31 ‘Scanproduct’ SA., Czarny Dunajec1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 10
▼M4
32 S.C. ‘Bed’, Dariusz Zuk, Krasienin
33 S.U.T.R. ‘Rol Trak’, Prochowice34 Stolarstwo Export-Import, Tadeusz Swirski, Dlugopole Zdroj35 Torunskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu Drzewnego w Toruniu, Adam
Wisniewski, Torun
36 ‘Transdrewneks’ Sp.zo.o., Grudziadz-Owczarki37 W.Z.P.U.M. ‘Euro-Tech’, Rakszawa38 Wytwazanie Skrzyn i Opakowan Drewnianych, Malgorzata i Ryszard
Nowak, Piaszyna
39 Zaklad Produkcyjny Bohuszko, Ryszard Bohuszko, Osno40 Z.P.H. ‘Maw’ S.C., Andrzej Kulej, Lubomierz41 Zaklad Uslugowo-Handlowy ‘Rolmex’, E. Cackowski, Lipno42 Zaklad Wielobranzowy Produkcyjno Uslugowy, Ryszard Potoniec,
Muszyna
43 Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S.C., Drawsko Pomorskie44 Zphu ‘Drewex’ SC., Agnieszka Pawlaczyk, Skwierzyna
45 Z.P.H.U. ‘Sek-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Tarnobrzeg
46 ‘Euro-Mega-Plus’ Sp.zo.o., Kielce47 ‘C.M.C.’ Sp.zo.o., Andrychow, Inwald48 Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV
704
49 Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gerka, Brodnica50 Z.P.H.U. ‘Drewnex’ Mamos, Luczak, Mamos s.j., Cekow51 Import-Export ‘Elko’ Sp.zo.o., Kalisz52 P.P.H.U. ‘Probox’, Import-Export, Kalisz53 Drewpal sp.j., Blizanow
54 Zaman S.C., Radom
55 ‘Marimpex’, Pulawy56 ‘AVEN’ Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn57 P.P.H.U. ‘Eurex’ BIS, Godynice58 P.H. ‘Drewex’ S.C., Lebork59 MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko60 ENKEL S.C., Pulawy61 PAL-PACK Sp.zo.o., Wierzchowo62 Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W.i.T.
HENSOLDT, Lebork1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 11
▼M4
63 Biuro Uslugowo-Handlowe, Wieslaw Rzezniczek, Lebork
64 P.P.U.H. ‘DREWPOL’, Braszewice
65 PTN Kruklanki Sp.zo.o., Krulanki66 WEDAM S.C., Stezyca67 Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow
68 Zaklad Produkcyjny ‘Tarta’, Lubsko
69 Firma ‘Krausdrew’, Cewice70 ‘Lidal’ S.C., Miastko71 Zaklad Przerobu Drewna Import-Export, Stanislaw Kociolek, Ladek
Zdroj
72 P.P.H.U. ‘Alk’, Bierzwnik73 ‘Empol’ S.C., Jastrzebniki 3774 Zaklad Produkcji Drzewnej Nr. 1, Export-Import, Julian Bartkowski,
Sanok
75 P.P.H. ‘Drewex’, Czarnkow76 ‘ZAP’ Przedsiebiorstwo Handlowe-Uslugowe Sp.C., Wschowa
77 P.P.H.U. ‘Opal’, ZygmuntPodgorski, Bukowsko 41
78 ‘Algepa-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Lubsko79 P.P.H. ‘A-Produkt’ S.C., Resko80 PPH ‘Paletex’ Sibinski Jaroslaw, Czajkow
81 Euro-Handels Sp.zo.o., Szczecin
82 Firma ‘KIKO’ S.C., Poznan83 ‘Enkel’ Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy84 Sliwka Lucyna, Klodzko
85 Firma Borkowski S.C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna
86 Produkcja — Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow87 ‘Prodpalet’ Handel, Boleslawiec88 Z.P.H.U. ‘Drexport’ S.C., Olecko, Osiedle Lesk
89 ‘Bilusa’ Sp.zo.o., Klodawa
90 Pawel Bilko ‘Pablo’, Klodawa91 Z.P.W. ‘Gober’ Sp.zo.o., Gorzow Wlkp.92 Kisiel Malgorzata ‘Drew-Pal’, Dobra Now93 P.W. ‘Remag’, Zlocieniec
94 P.P.U.H. PAL-POL S.C., Prabuty
95 Firma ‘A.C.S.’ S.C., Kamien1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 12
▼M4
96 B.H. ‘MARINO’, Drawsko Pomorskie
97 P.T.P.U.H. ‘ROB-POL’, Milkow
98 Z.H.U.P. Agromal, Sieradz99 ‘SMT’ Sp.zo.o., Miastko
100 Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni, Torun
101 Artur Rochmankowski, Trzcinsko-Zdroj
102 ‘Depo’ Sp.zo.o., Ilowa103 B.P.R. Sp.zo.o., Warszawa104 ‘DREWNO’ Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn
105 P.P.H. ‘Astra’ Sp.zo.o., Nawojowa
106 ‘D & M & D’ Sp.zo.o., Blizanow107 P.P.H. ‘Vector’, Kalisz108 ‘Palko’ Sp.zo.o., Sedziszow109 P.P.H. Pol-Wood S.C., Rzekun
110 PPH ‘YANSAM’, Zlocieniec
111 P.P.H.U. ‘ELMA’ S.C., Sobieseki112 PPH SWENDEX S.C., Lublin113 P.P.H.U. ROMAX Import-Eksport, Wroclaw
114 Z.P.H.U. ‘BESTPOL’ Sp. z o.o., Lututow
115 P.P.H.U. Zbigniew Marek, Andrichow116 Pomorski Serwis Paletowy Sp. z o.o., Kobylnica117 ‘EMI’ S.C., Bilgoraj
118 P.P.H.U. ‘Wal-Trans’ Waldemar Latka, Jelenia Gora
119 P.P.D.B. ‘Lesnik’ S.C., Krosno120 ‘EUROPAL’ S.C., Brzeziny121 P.P.U.H. ‘CENTROPAL’ EKSPORT-IMPORT, Czajkow
122 Energomontaz Polnoc Serwis Sp. zo.o., Swierze Gorne
123 P.P.H.U. Jerzy Florczyk, Ruciane Nida124 Paletten-Systeme Sp.zo.o., Grabow n.Prosna125 ARBOR S.C., Trzebnica126 P.P.H. ‘BOM'S’ S-ka zo.o., Suwalki
127 P.P.H.U. Futex. Stargard Szczecinski
128 PALDREW Henryk Bednarski, Czarne129 P.P.H.U. ‘Marco-Drew’ S.C., Stargard Szczecinski1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 13
▼M4
130 ‘Tilia’, Szczecin
131 ‘Tartak — Domaszkow’, Domaszkow1997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 14
▼M5
ANNEX II
ManufacturerAdditional
TARIC code
1. ‘Baumann Palety’ Sp.zo.o., Barczewo 8570
2. E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S.C., Snietnica 85713. F.P.H. ‘Tina’ S.C., Katowice 85724. Firma ‘Sabelmar’ S.C., Konczyce Male 85735. ‘Kross-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Kolobrzeg 85766. P.P.H. ‘GKT’ S.C., Bilgoraj 85847. P.P.H. ‘Unikat’, Aleksandrow IV 697 85868. P.P.H.U. ‘Adapol’ S.C., Wolomin 8587
9. P.P.H.U. ‘Alpa’ Sp.zo.o., Dobrzyca 8588
10. P.P.U.H. ‘Alwa’ Sp.zo.o., Slawno 858911. P.P.H.U. ‘Palimex’ Sp.zo.o., Wloszakowice 859012. P.P.U.H. ‘SMS’ — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno 859113. P.T.H. ‘Mirex’, Kolobrzeg 859714. P.W. ‘Peteco’ Sp.zo.o., Warszawa 869015. ‘Paletex’ Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk, Warszawa 869116. Produkcja Palet‘A. Adamus’, Kuznia Grabowska 869217. P.P.H. ZygmuntSkibinski, Kowal 869318. ‘Scanproduct’ S.A., Czarny Dujanec 871519. ‘Transdrewneks’ Sp.zo.o., Grudziadz-Owczarki 871620. W.Z.P.U.M. ‘Euro-Tech’, Rakszawa 872521. Z.P.H. ‘Palettenwerk’ — K. Kozik, Jordanow 872622. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S.C., Drawsko Pomorskie 874523. Z.P.H.U. ‘Sek-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Tarnobrzeg 852624. ‘Euro-Mega-Plus’ Sp.zo.o., Kielce 852725. Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk,
Aleksandrow IV 7048529
26. Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gerka, Brod-
nica8530
27. Z.P.H.U. ‘Drewnex’ Mamos, Luczak, Mamos s.j.,
Cekow8531
28. P.P.H.U. ‘Probox’, Import-Export, Kalisz 8533
29. Zaman S.C., Radom 853530. ‘Marimpex’, Pulawy 85371997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 15
▼M5
ManufacturerAdditional
TARIC code
31. ‘AVEN’ Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn 8558
32. P.P.H.U. ‘Eurex’ BIS, Godynice 8538
33. ENKEL S.C., Pulawy 8540
34. Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W.i.T.
HENSOLDT, Lebork8541
35. P.P.U.H. ‘DREWPOL’, Braszewice 8834
36. PTN Kruklanki Sp.zo.o., Krulanki 855637. WEDAM S.C., Stezyca 855738. Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow 8559
39. P.P.H.U. ‘Alk’, Bierzwnik 8561
40. ‘Empol’ S.C., Jastrzebniki 37 856041. Euro-Handels Sp.zo.o., Szczecin 844042. P.P.H. ‘Paletex’ Sibinski Jaroslaw, Czajkow 844143. Firma ‘KIKO’ S.C., Poznan 8443
44. ‘Enkel’ Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy 8444
45. Firma Borkowski S.C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna 844646. ‘Bilusa’ Sp.zo.o., Klodawa 848447. P.P.U.H. PAL-POL S.C., Prabuty 8485
48. Firma ‘A.C.S.’ S.C., Kamien 8486
49. ‘SMT’ Sp.zo.o., Miastko 856250. Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni, Torun 856351. ‘Palko’ Sp.zo.o., Sedziszow 8565
52. P.P.H. ‘Vector’, Kalisz 8567
53. P.P.H.U. ‘ELMA’ S.C., Sobieseki A10954. P.P.H. SWENDEX S.C., Lublin A11055. Pomorski Serwis Paletowy Sp.zo.o., Kobylnica A114
56. ‘EMI’ S.C., Bilgoraj A124
57. P.P.H.U. ROMAX Import-Eksport, Wroclaw A13358. P.P.D.B. ‘Lesnik’ S.C., Krosno A25959. ‘EUROPAL’ S.C., Brzeziny A26060. P.P.U.H. ‘CENTROPAL’ EKSPORT-IMPORT,
CzajkowA261
61. Energomontaz Polnoc Serwis Sp.zo.o., Swierze Gorne A262
62. P.P.H. ‘BOM'S’ S-ka zo.o., Suwalki A2631997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 16
▼M5
ManufacturerAdditional
TARIC code
63. P.P.H. ‘Astra’ Sp.zo.o., Nawojowa A3781997R2334 — EN — 15.06.2002 — 005.001 — 17