1975D0576 — EN — 25.04.1992 — 001.001

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

authorizing the Federal Republic of Germany to restrict the marketing of seed or propagating material of certain varieties of agricultural plant species

Amended by:

▼B

COMMISSION DECISION

of 30 June 1975

authorizing the Federal Republic of Germany to restrict the marketing of seed or propagating material of certain varieties of agricultural plant species

(Only the German text is authentic)

(75/576/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to Council Directive No 70/457/EEC ( 1 ) of 29 September 1970 on the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species, as last amended by Council Directive No 73/438/EEC ( 2 ) of 11 December 1973, and in particular Article 15 (2) and (3) thereof;

Having regard to the application lodged by the Federal Republic of Germany;

Whereas under Article 15 (1) of the said Directive, seed and propagating material of varieties of agricultural plant species which have been officially accepted in one or more of the original Member States in accordance with principles corresponding to those of the said Directive are, after 31 December 1974, no longer subject to any marketing restrictions relating to variety within the Community as originally constituted;

Whereas however, Article 15 (2) of the said Directive provides that a Member State may be authorized upon application to prohibit the marketing of seed and propagating material of certain varieties;

Whereas the Federal Republic of Germany has applied for such authorization in respect of several varieties of beet, fodder plants, rape, cereals and potatoes;

Whereas, the Commission by its Decision of 30 December 1974 ( 3 ) extended the period provided for in the said Article 15 (1) for the Federal Republic of Germany beyond 31 December 1974 until 30 June 1975 in respect of the majority of these varieties, with or without qualifications;

Whereas the Commission has meanwhile completed its examination of the German application with regard to these varieties;

Whereas the varieties Delitzsch Poly, Kaweaa, Kawecercomono, Kaweinterpoly, (sugar beet) Pelo (perennial ryegrass), King, Timo (timothy), Boreal (lucerne) and the varieties of oats, durum wheat and maize, except for Pag 21 and Pioneer 137, listed in the application, have not been the subject of official growing trials in the Federal Republic of Germany in view of the German application;

Whereas the said varieties of sugar beet, perennial ryegrass, timothy and lucerne have been the subject in the Federal Republic of Germany of an application for official acceptance in so far as their seed, in the case of grass varieties, is not intended for the production of fodder plants (Article 4 (2) (a) of the said Directive), or in so for as their seed is to be marketed in another country (Article 4 (2) (b) thereof); whereas therefore even the applicant has not claimed that these varieties have any satisfactory value for cultivation or use in the Federal Republic of Germany; whereas therefore these varieties can be treated as not producing results in the Federal Republic of Germany, which, with respect to their qualities taken as a whole as regards their value for cultivation or use, correspond to those obtained from a comparable variety accepted there (Article 15 (3) (c), first case thereof);

Whereas the varieties of oats concerned are of the winter type; whereas the varieties of maize concerned have an FAO maturity class index of 350 or over; whereas it is well know that the varieties of winter oats, varieties of durum wheat and varieties of maize which have an FAO maturity class index of 350 or over at present are not yet suitable for cultivation in the Federal Republic of Germany (Article 15 (3) (c) second case thereof);

Whereas the other varieties listed in the Decision have been the subject of official growing trials in the Federal Republic of Germany; whereas the results of these trials have led the Federal Republic of Germany to decide that these varieties are not distinct or sufficiently uniform there, that their cultivation could be harmful from the point of view of plant health to the cultivation of other varieties or species there, or that their value for cultivation or use is inferior to other comparable varieties accepted in the Federal Republic of Germany;

Whereas the other Member States have accepted these results for the varieties Cebeta (sugar beet), Dactimo (cocksfoot) Garanta, (Meadow fescue) Atempo, Massa, Terpas (perennial rye-grass), Lofar (timothy), Glacier, Hybride de Cresy (lucerne), Lola, Presta (common vetch), Leon (6-row-barley) and Galma (rye); whereas it is therefore clear that these varieties do not produce results in the Federal Republic of Germany, which, with respect to their qualities taken as a whole as regards their value for cultivation on use, correspond to those obtained from a comparable vartiety accepted there (Article 15 (3) (c), first case thereof);

Whereas, in respect of the varieties Polymoss (fodder beet), Tetri (red clover), and Trait d'Union (two-row barley), the results of the trials show that in the Federal Republic of Germany, when compared with the national rules governing the acceptance of varieties there, which apply within the framework of current Community provisions, they are not distinct from other varieties accepted there (Article 15 (3) (a) thereof);

Whereas, in respect of the varieties Intenso (timothy), Arina Dasas (smooth-stalked meadow grass), Blako (rape), the results of the trials show that in the Federal Republic of Germany, when compared with the national rules governing the acceptance of varieties there which apply within the framework of current Community provisions they are not sufficiently uniform in certain characteristics (Article 15 (3) (a) thereof);

Whereas, in respect of the varieties Avanti, Prevalent, Primura, Procura (potatoes), the results of the trials show that their cultivation in the Federal Republic of Germany could be harmful from the point of view of plant health to the cultivation of other varieties of potatoes there (Article 15 (3) (b) thereof);

Whereas, in respect of the other varieties listed in this Decision, the results of the trials show that they do not produce results in the Federal Republic of Germany, which with respect to their qualities taken as a whole as regards their value for cultivation or use, correspond to those obtained from a comparable variety accepted there (Article 15 (3) (c), first case thereof);

Whereas therefore the application of the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of all these varieties should be granted in full; whereas account should also be taken of the fact that some of these varieties are officially accepted in the Federal Republic of Germany provided their seed is not intended for the production of fodder plants or is to be marketed in another country;

Whereas other varieties are no longer included in the German application;

Whereas the measure provided for in this Decision is in accordance with the Opinion of the Standing Committee on Seed and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: