This document is meant purely as documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
"B COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2334/97
of 24 November 1997
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of flat pallets of wood originating in the Republic of
Poland and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed
(OJ L 324, 27.11.1997, p. 1)
Amended by:
Official Journal
No page date
"M1 Council Regulation (EC) No 2079/98 of 24 September 1998 L 266 1 1.10.1998
"M2 Council Regulation (EC) No 2048/1999 of 27 September 1999 L 255 1 30.9.1999
"M3 Council Regulation (EC) No 1521/2000 of 10 July 2000 L 175 1 14.7.2000
Corrected by:
"C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 221, 1.9.2000, p. 27 (1521/2000)1997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 1
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2334/97
of 24 November 1997
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of flat pallets
of wood originating in the Republic of Poland and collecting definitively
the provisional duty imposed
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995
on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the
European Community (1), and in particular Articles 9 (4) and 10 (2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal presented by the Commission after consulting
the Advisory Committee,
Whereas:
A. PROVISIONAL MEASURES
(1) The Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 (2) (hereinafter
referred to as the Provisional Regulation) imposed provisional dutieson certain imports into the Community of flat pallets of wood fallingwithin CN code ex 4415 20 20 and originating in Poland. In addition,
undertakings offered by certain exporters in connection with those
imports were accepted by the Provisional Regulation. The productscope of these undertakings was limited to a certain type of flat palletsof wood, i.e. EUR-pallets.
(2) By Regulation (EC) No 1632/97 (
3), the Commission amended the
Provisional Regulation by adding a provision whereby genuine new
Polish exporters can be allocated the weighted average duty applicable
to cooperating companies not included in the sample of exportersinvestigated and can have undertakings accepted with regard to exportsof EUR-pallets.
(3) By Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 (
4), pursuant to the abovementioned
new provision, the Commission further amended the Provisional
Regulation by including a number of genuine new exporters in the listof companies receiving the weighted average duty and by acceptingundertakings from some of these new exporters.
B. SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE
(4) Following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties, several
interested parties submitted comments in writing. The parties who so
requested were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission.The Commission continued to seek and verify all the information itdeemed necessary for the purpose of its definitive findings.
(5) Parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the
basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of
definitive anti-dumping duties and the definitive collection of amountssecured by way of provisional subsequent to this disclosure.
(6) The comments submitted by the interested parties were duly examined
and, where deemed appropriate, taken into account in making thedefinitive findings.
C. PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
(7) According to recitals (8) and (9) of the Provisional Regulation the
product under consideration is flat wooden pallets, falling under CN
code ex 4415 20 20 and originating in Poland.!B
(1) OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2331/96
(OJ L 317, 6. 12. 1996, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 150, 7. 6. 1997, p. 4.
(3) OJ L 225, 15. 8. 1997, p. 11.
(4) OJ L 225, 15. 8. 1997, p. 13.1997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 2
It appeared that the provisional anti-dumping duty on wooden pallets
was not applied consistently by the customs authorities. For example,while some customs offices applied the provisional anti-dumping dutyon used and repaired pallets, others did not. It was also reported that
the anti-dumping duty had in some cases been applied to pallets when
they were loaded with other goods for the purpose of importing thesegoods into the Community.
(8) Despite the fact that used and repaired pallets have a similar use and
physical characteristics closely resembling the product concerned, i.e.
newly produced pallets, the investigation has shown that newlyproduced pallets on the one hand and used and repaired pallets on the
other hand differ substantially in terms of the perception by potential
pallet users and channels through which they are usually sold.
(9) On the basis of the foregoing, it is concluded that used and repaired
pallets cannot be considered to be like products in accordance with
Article 1 (4) of the Basic Regulation and therefore these pallets are not
covered by the scope of the current investigation. It follows thatanti-dumping measures should not apply to used and repaired palletsbut only to imports of newly produced flat wooden pallets originating
in Poland.
In addition, as regards flat pallets of wood originating in Poland which
are loaded with other goods for the purpose of importing these goodsinto the Community, the Commission is of the opinion that these
should be treated as used pallets provided that the pallets represent
only a minor proportion of the total value of the loaded goodsimported.
D. DUMPING
1.Normal value
(10) As set out in recital 16 of the Provisional Regulation, in constructing
normal values for pallets other than the EUR-pallet, the weighted
average profit margin relating to domestic sales found for two
investigated companies which had representative and profitabledomestic sales was used for other Polish exporters not having maderepresentative and/or profitable domestic sales, in accordance with
Article 2 (6) (a) of the Basic Regulation.
(11) Two of these other Polish exporters claimed that the domestic sales
used as a basis for determining this weighted average profit margin
might not be representative due to circumstances which are specific to
the two companies having made these sales and which might thus havegenerated exceptionally high profit levels. However, the investigationhas shown that the sales used to calculate the weighted average profit
margin have been made in sufficient quantities and in the ordinary
course of trade, and that the resulting profit margin can be consideredto reasonably reflect the actual amounts of profit realized on the Polishmarket.
(12) With regard to the remaining aspects of normal value, in the absence of
any new argument raised by the interested parties, the methodologyand the findings as described in recitals 16 to 18 of the ProvisionalRegulation are confirmed.
2.Export price
(13) Following disclosure of the provisional findings, two Polish exporters,
for whom export prices have been constructed in accordance withArticle 2 (9) of the Basic Regulation, and their related importer in theCommunity have claimed that the adjustments made for selling,
general and administrative (SG& A) expenses and profit were
excessive in respect of the amounts actually attributed to the productunder investigation.
(14) As regards profits, the Commission has re-examined the issue and has
sought additional information and evidence from independent
importers of wooden pallets on profits made in the investigationperiod, i.e. the calendar year 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IP’).As a result of this re-examination the findings made for the purpose of
the provisional measures are confirmed and, therefore, retained as
definitive findings.!B1997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 3
(15) In the Provisional Regulation, the amount of SG& A expenses was
determined by allocating these expenses to the product concerned onthe basis of turnover. This allocation key was used in the absence of aspecific, historically utilized allocation or any other more appropriate
method. The company also agreed to this approach during the
on-the-spot verification. Afterwards the importer proposed a differentallocation of SG& A expenses based on an estimated apportionment ofall cost items to the product concerned and other activities of the
company. However, given that it has not been shown that the new
allocation method has been historically used, the claim had to berejected and preference given to the allocation of costs on the basis of
turnover, in accordance with Article 2 (5) of the Basic Regulation.
(16) With regard to the remaining aspects concerning the determination of
the export price, in the absence of any new argument raised by theinterested parties, the methodology and the findings as described inrecitals 19 to 21 of the Provisional Regulation are confirmed.
3.Comparison
(17) In the absence of any new argument raised by the interested parties, the
methodology and the findings made with regard to the comparisonbetween the export price and the normal value as described in recitals
22 to 25 of the Provisional Regulation are confirmed.
4.Dumping margins
(18) As set out in recital 27 of the Provisional Regulation, a single dumping
margin was allocated to the two Polish exporters which are both related
to the same importer in the Community, in order to preclude the
possibility that future exports to the Community might be channelledthrough the company having the lower margin. The single dumping
margin applicable to both Polish exporters concerned was calculated
on the basis of the weighted average of the individual dumpingmargins found for each company.
(19) As a result of the revision of the methodology provisionally used to
weigh the two margins, the definitive single dumping margin to be
applied to both companies amounts to 5,9 % instead of 6,3 %.
(20) As regards the dumping margins found for the Polish exporters in the
sample, namely the margin applicable to cooperating exporters notinvestigated and the margin applicable to non-cooperating exportersnot investigated, in the absence of any new argument, the methodology
and findings as set out in recitals 26 and 28 to 31 of the Provisional
Regulation are confirmed.
(21) In view of the above, the definitive dumping margins are as follows:
1. Investigated companies included in the sample:
— P .P .H.i.U. Eldagran, Slawoborze 4,9 %
— Intur-Kfs, Spolka z o.o., Inowroclaw 9,7 %
— Z.P .H. Palettenwerk Kazimierz Kozik, Bystra Podhalanska 4,0 %— RSP Rzecko, Choszczno 0,0 %
— Sabelmar Import-Export, Konczyce Male 9,8 %
— Paletex, Roman Panasiuk, Warszawa 9,8 %— Tor-Pal, Spolka z o.o., Kwidzyn 0,0 %
— Z.P .P .D., Zielona Gora 10,6 %.
2. Individually treated companies (PPHU Alpa, Spolka z o.o.,
Dobrzyca and PPHU Palimex, Spolka z o.o., Wloszakowice)5,9 %.
3. Cooperating companies not investigated 6,3 %.
4. Non-cooperating companies 10,6 %.!
B1997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 4
E.DETERMINATION OF THE COMMUNITY INDUSTRY
(22) As no new arguments were received in connection with the definition
of the Community industry as set out in recital 32 of the ProvisionalRegulation, the qualification of the complaining industry as theCommunity industry for the purposes of the current investigation is
confirmed.
F.INJURY
(23) A main submission with regard to injury was received from two related
Polish exporters. They claimed that the Commission only analysed thechanges in consumption between the beginning and the end of the
period covered by the examination of injury, thus not taking into
account the variations which had occurred between 1992 and the IP .According to these exporters, the trends concerning consumption andother injury factors such as sales, market share and production,
observed between 1992 and the IP , corroborated the fact that the
Community industry did not suffer any injury.
(24) As a matter of principle it should be recalled that in anti-dumping
investigations the time period on which the analysis and thedetermination of injury is based covers a period of several years. As
mentioned in recital 6 of the Provisional Regulation, in the
investigation at issue this period covered the time from 1 January1991 to the end of the IP , namely 31 December 1994.
As set out in recitals 51 to 53 of the Provisional Regulation, injury has
been assessed and determined in the light of the evidence available forthe period covering the analysis of injury by considering the
development and trends of the various injury factors throughout this
entire period.
(25) The analysis of injury has shown that dumped imports have
continuously increased both in absolute terms (+ 87 %) as well as interms of Community market share (+ 83 %) from 1991 to the IP(1994).
(26) As regards prices, it has been found that Polish pallet prices decreased
significantly over the above period, i.e. by 26 %. Furthermore, during
the IP an average price undercutting level of 14 % was found to exist.
(27) As far as the situation of the Community industry is concerned, the
investigation has shown that all the injury factors investigated and
analysed in detail, namely sales, production, capacity utilization,market share, profitability, price trends and employment have
continuously deteriorated since 1991.
The imports under investigation therefore had a considerable impact
on both the Community market and the Community industry. As
mentioned in recital 51 of the Provisional Regulation this conclusionwas reached despite the fact that the Community industry’ s production,capacity utilization and sales improved from 1993 up to the IP due to
the fact that this improvement was only the result of a recovery of
Community consumption back to the level prevailing in 1991. Otherfactors, notably the development of the Community industry’ s marketshares, prices and profitability, clearly showed a negative trend which
can only be explained by the existence of the dumped imports. The
argument raised by the Polish exporters could therefore not beaccepted.
(28) As there is no concrete or positive evidence which would allow the
modification of the provisional conclusion made by the Commission
whereby the Community industry had suffered material injury within
the meaning of Article 3 of the Basic Regulation, this conclusion isconfirmed.
G. CAUSATION OF INJURY
(29) As far as the analysis of the causal link between dumping and injury is
concerned, the abovementioned Polish exporters claimed that this
analysis was not consistently based on data relating to the whole
Community.!B1997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 5
In this respect reference is made to recitals 54 to 69 of the Provisional
Regulation where it was established that a causal link betweendumping and injury existed on a Community-wide level. TheProvisional Regulation also pointed out that the aforementioned
conclusion had been reinforced and confirmed by a more detailed and
thorough analysis carried out in specific Member States referred to as‘selected markets’ in the Provisional Regulation. This analysis clearlyshowed that the claim made by these two exporters could not,
therefore, be accepted.
(30) In the absence of any further argument, the findings set out in the
Provisional Regulation are confirmed indicating that in accordance
with Article 3 (6) of the Basic Regulation dumped imports have causedmaterial injury to the Community industry.
H. COMMUNITY INTEREST
(31) As no new arguments were r eceived in connection with the
Community interest analysis made in the Provisional Regulation, the
provisional findings are confirmed.
I.ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
(32) Based on the above conclusions on dumping, injury, causal link and
Community interest, it was considered what form and level ofanti-dumping measures would have to be taken in order to remove thetrade-distorting effects of injurious dumping and to restore effective
competitive conditions on the Community market.
(33) Since the level of prices at which the injurious effects of the imports
would be removed was higher than the dumping margins found in the
investigation, the level of the measures should be based on thedumping margins.
(34) As already mentioned in recital 2, the Commission has, at the
provisional stage of the investigation, accepted undertakings pursuantto Article 8 of the Basic Regulation in respect of the EUR pallet.
Pursuant to these undertakings, the Polish exporters have, inter alia,
offered not to sell EUR pallets below a certain minimum price. Theundertakings also contain strict monitoring provisions. Furthermore, itwill be recalled that exports of pallet types other than the EUR pallet
made by exporters from which an undertaking was accepted as well as
all other exports of the product concerned to the Community made byother exporters were subject to a provisional anti-dumping duty.
(35) It is now definitively confirmed that the combined effect of the
undertakings and the anti-dumping duty is considered sufficient toremove the injurious effects of dumping. Since the investigation has
now been concluded, definitive anti-dumping duties will be imposed in
case of violation or withdrawal of an undertaking given by anyexporter. The level of the duty for the EUR-pallet type in case of suchbreach or violation would be the same as the duty applicable to imports
of other types of pallet.
(36) On the above basis, and, where applicable, in parallel with undertak-
ings accepted, definitive duties, in the form of ad valorem duties,
should be imposed.
J.NEW EXPORTERS
(37) As already mentioned in recital 3 above, the Commission, by
Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 amending the Provisional Regulation,allocated the weighted average duty imposed on cooperating exporters
not investigated to a number of genuine new exporters. By that
Regulation (EC) No 1633/97 the Commission accepted undertakingswith regard to EUR pallets from some of these new exporters, thusexempting them from any provisional duty with regard to that type of
pallet.
This treatment of genuine new exporters is definitively confirmed.
(38) In the meantime, the Commission has received further applications
from allegedly new exporters. Those applicants which providedsufficient evidence showing that they are genuine new exporters
should be made subject to the weighted average definitive duty.
Furthermore, the new exporters from which the Commission has!B1997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 6
accepted an undertaking under Commission Decision 97/797/EC (1)
should be exempted from any anti-dumping duty with regard to thattype of pallet.
(39) A provision should be included in this Regulation whereby, through an
amendment thereto, any genuine new exporters who may come
forward in the future should be made subject to the weighted average
duty and should be exempted from any duty in cases where theCommission accepts undertakings from those exporters.
K. COLLECTION OF THE PROVISIONAL DUTIES
(40) In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found for the
exporting producers and in the light of the seriousness of injury causedto the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts
secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duties should be
definitively collected at the level of the definitive duties for newlyproduced flat pallets of wood originating in Poland. Amounts secured
in excess of the level of the definitive duties and amounts secured for
repaired, used and loaded pallets should be released,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
1. A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of new flat
pallets of wood falling within CN code ex 4415 20 20 (Taric code:
4415 20 20*10), originating in Poland. This duty shall not apply to imports
of used and of repaired flat pallets of wood.
Flat pallets of wood which are loaded with other goods for the purpose of
importing those goods into the Community shall be treated as used pallets
provided that the goods in question are the main purpose of the import and
that the pallets represent only a minor proportion of the total value of thegoods imported.
2. The rate of definitive anti-dumping duties applicable to the net,
free-at-Community frontier prices, before duty, shall be as follows:
Manufacturer Rate of dutyTaric Additional
Code
Zielonogorskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu Drzewnego, PL-65-950 Zielona Gora 10,6 % 8013
Firma ‘Sabelmar’ — Leszek Sabela, PL-43-525 Konczyce Male 9,8 % 8014P .P .H.U. ‘Alpa’ Sp. z o.o., PL-76-038 Dobrzyca 5,9 % 8015P .P .H.U. ‘Palimex’ Sp. z o.o., PL-64-140 Wloszakowice 5,9 % 8015P .W . ‘Intur-KFS’ Sp. z o.o., PL-88-100 Inowroclaw 9,7 % 8016‘Paletex’ Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk, PL-01-601 Warszawa 9,8 % 8014Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyji Handlu I Uslug S.C. ‘Eldagran’,
Mr M. Zeminski, PL-78-314 Slawoborze4,9 % 8017
"
M3Z.P .H. ‘Pallettenwerk’ — K. Kozik, PL-34-785 Jordanow 3 4,0 % 8018
Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjno Handlowe, ‘Tor-Pal’ Sp. z o.o., PL-82-500 Kwidzyn 0 % 8020
Rolnicza Spoldzielnia Produkcyjna Rzecko, PL-73-200 Choszczno 0 % 8020
Companies listed in Annex I to this Regulation 6,3 % 8019Others 10,6 % 8900
3. Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs
duties shall apply.!B
(1) See page 36 of this Official Journal.1997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 7
Article 2
Notwithstanding Article 1, the duties shall not apply to imports of one
specific pallet type, namely the EUR pallet, being a flat pallet of wood,
marked by the registered mark ‘EUR’ and the initials of the approving railway,
manufactured, exported to the Community and invoiced to buyers establishedin the Community by the companies listed in Annex II to this Regulation inrespect of which undertakings have been accepted by Commission Regulation
(EC) No 1023/97 and Commission Decision 97/797/EC.
Article 3
The amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty under
Regulation (EC) No 1023/97 shall be definitively collected at the duty ratesdefinitively imposed. Amounts secured in excess of the definitive rate ofanti-dumping duty and amounts secured for repaired, used and loaded pallets
shall be released.
Article 4
1. Where any party provides sufficient evidence to the Commission that:
— it did not export to the Community or produce the goods described in
Article 1 (1) during the investigation period,
— it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in the exporting
country which are subject to the anti-dumping duties imposed by this
Regulation,
— it has actually exported to the Community the goods concerned after the
investigation period, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual
obligation to export a significant quantity to the Community,
then the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal submitted by the
Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, may amend thisRegulation by adding that party to the list of companies in Annex I.
2. Where the Commission accepts undertakings with regard to the EUR
pallet from any party mentioned in paragraph 1 with regard to the EUR pallet,
the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal submitted by the
Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, may amend thisRegulation by adding that party to the list of companies in Annex II.
Article 5
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its
publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities .
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all
Member States.!B1997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 8
ANNEX I
Manufacturer
1 ‘Baumann Palety’ Sp.zo.o., Barczewo
2 ‘DAST’ GmbH, Poznan3 Drew-Pol Export-Import, Wodarz Norbert, Murow4 E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S.C., Snietnica5 F .P .H. ‘Tina’ S.C., Katowice6 F .P .H. Tadeusz Fisher, Maly Gleboczek7 F .P .U.H. ‘Rol-Mar’, Adam Piatek, Klodzko8 Z.P .H.U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa9 Internationale Paletten Company Sp., Lebork
10 ‘Kross-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Kolobrzeg
11 P .P .U.H. ‘Drewmax’ Sp.zo.o. (formerly P .P .H. ‘Drewnex’), Krakow12 P .P .H. ‘GKT’ S.C., Majdan Nowy13 P .P .H. ‘Pamadex’, Ligota14 P .P .H. ‘Unikat’, Aleksandrow IV 69715 P .P .H.U. ‘Adapol’ S.C., Wolomin16"
C1P .P .U.H. 3‘Alwa’ Sp.zo.o., Tychowo
17"C1P .P .U.H. 3‘SMS’ — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno
18 P .T.H. ‘Mirex’, Kolobrzeg19 P .W . ‘Peteco’ Sp.zo.o., Warszawa
20 Parafia Rzymsko-Katolicka, B. Niepokalaneg Dzialalnose Gospodaroza,
Nowy Sacz
21 Produkcja Palet ‘A. Adamus’, Kuznia Grabowska22 Produkcja Skup Palet Drewnanych, Stanislaw Lachowicz, Majdan Sieniawski
170
23 Przedsiebiorstwo ‘Amesko’, Andrzej Skora, Trzebnica24"
C1P .H.U.3‘Justyna’, Gubin
25"C1P .H.U.3‘Akropol’, Krakow
26"C1P .H.U.3Produkcyjne ‘Lech’, Lech Szwez, Zary
27 Przedsiebiorstwo Obrobki Drewna ‘Palet-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Dabrowka WLKP
28 P .P .H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal29 P .P .H.U. ‘AWA’ Sp.zo.o., Nowy Sacz30 Przedsiebiorstwo Wielobranzowe, Zdziolaw Milocki, Ostroda31 ‘Scanproduct’ S.A., Czarny Dujanec32 S.C. ‘Bed’, Dariusz Zuk, Krasienin33 S.U.T.R. ‘Rol Trak’, Prochowice34 Stolarstwo Export-Import, Tadeusz Swirski, Dlugopole Zdroj35 Torunskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu Drzewnego w Toruniu, Adam
Wisniewski, Torun!
M31997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 9
36 ‘Transdrewneks’ Sp.zo.o., Grudziadz-Owczarki
37 W .Z.P .U.M. ‘Euro-Tech’, Rakszawa38 Wytwazanie Skrzyn i Opakowan Drewnianych, Malgorzata i Ryszard Nowak,
Piaszyna
39 Zaklad Produkcyjno Bohuszko, Ryszard Bohuszko, Osno40"
C1Z.P .H.3‘Maw’ S.C., Andrzej Kulej, Lubomierz
41 Zaklad Uslugowo-Handlowy ‘Rolmex’, E. Cackowski, Lipno
42 Zaklad Wielobranzowy Produkcyjno Uslugowy, Ryszard Potoniec, Muszyna43 Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S.C., Drawsko Pomorskie44 Z.P .H.U. ‘Drewex’ SC., Agnieszka Pawlaczyk, Skwierzyna45 Z.P .H.U. ‘Sek-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Tarnobrzeg46 ‘Euro-Mega-Plus’ Sp.zo.o., Kielce47 ‘C.M.C.’ Sp.zo.o., Andrychow, Inwald48 Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV 70449 Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gerka, Brodnica50 Z.P .H.U. ‘Drewnex’ S.C., Zelazkow 45 b
51 Import-Export ‘Elko’ Sp.zo.o., Kalisz
52 P .P .H.U. ‘Probox’, Import-Export, Kalisz53 Drewpal S.C., Stawiszyn54 Zaman S.C., Radom55 ‘Marimpex’, Pulawy56 ‘A VEN’ Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn57 P .P .H.U. ‘Eurex’ S.C., Godynice58 P .H. ‘Drewex’ S.C., Lebork59 MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko60 ENKEL S.C., Pulawy
61 PAL-PACK Sp.zo.o., Wierzchowo
62 Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W .i.T. HENSOLDT, Lebork63 Biuro Uslugowo-Handlowe, Wieslaw Rzezniczek, Lebork64 P .P .U.H. ‘DREWPOL ’, Braszewice65 PTN Kruklanki Sp.zo.o., Krulanki66 WEDAM S.C., Stezyca67 Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow68 Zaklad Produkcyjny ‘Tarta’, Lubsko69 Firma ‘Krausdrew’, Cewice70 ‘Lidal’ S.C., Miastko
71 Zaklad Przerobu Drewna Import-Export, Stanislaw Kociolek, Ladek Zdroj
72 P .P .H.U. ‘Alk’, Bierzwnik73 ‘Empol’ S.C., Jastrzebniki 37!
M31997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 10
74 Zaklad Produkcji Drzewnej Nr. 1, Export-Import, Julian Bartkowski, Sanok
75 P .P .H. ‘Drewex’, Czarnkow76 ‘ZAP’ Przedsiebiorstwo Handlowe-Uslugowe Sp.C., Wschowa77 P .P .H.U. ‘Opal’, Zygmunt Podgorski, Bukowsko 4178 ‘Algepa-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Lubsko79 P .P .H. ‘A-Produkt’ S.C., Resko
80 P .P .H. ‘Paletex’ Sibinski Jaroslaw, Czajkow
81 Euro-Handels Sp.zo.o., Szczecin82 Firma ‘KIKO’ S.C., Poznan83 ‘Enkel’ Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy84 Sliwka Lucyna, Klodzko85 Firma Borkowski S.C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna86 Produkcja-Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow87 ‘Prodpalet’ Handel, Boleslawiec88 Z.P .H.U. ‘Drexport’ S.C., Olecko, Osiedle Lesk89 ‘Bilusa’ Sp.zo.o., Klodawa
90 Pawel Bilko ‘Pablo’, Klodawa
91 Z.P .W . ‘Gober’ Sp.zo.o., Gorzow Wlkp.92 Kisiel Malgorzata ‘Drew-Pal’, Dobra Now93 P .W . ‘Remag’, Zlocieniec94 P .P .U.H. PAL-POL S.C., Prabuty95 Firma ‘A.C.S.’ S.C., Kamien96 Zaklad Drzewny ‘MARINO’, Kawcze97 P .T.P .U.H. ‘ROB-POL ’, Milkow98 Z.H.U.P . Agromal, Sieradz99 ‘SMT’ Sp.zo.o., Miastko
100 Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni, Torun
101 Artur Rochmankowski, Trzcinsko-Zdroj102 ‘Depo’ Sp.zo.o., Ilowa103 B.P .R. Sp.zo.o., Warszawa104 ‘DREWNO’ Sp.zo.o., Krzeszyce105 P .P .H. ‘Astra’ Sp.zo.o., Nowy Sacz106 ‘D & M & D’ Sp.zo.o., Blizanow107 P .P .H. ‘Vector’, Kalisz108 ‘Palko’ Sp.zo.o., Sedziszow109 P .P .H. Pol-Wood S.C., Rzekun
110 P .P .H. ‘YANSAM’, Zlocieniec
111 P .P .H.U. ‘ELMA’ S.C., Sobieseki112 P .P .H. SWENDEX S.C., Lublin!
M31997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 11
113 P .P .H.U. ROMAX Import-Eksport, Wroclaw
114 Z.P .H.U. ‘BESTPOL ’ Sp.zo.o., Lututow115 P .P .H.U. Zbigniew Marek, Andrichow116 Pomorski Serwis Paletowy Sp.zo.o., Kobylnica117 ‘EMI’ S.C., Bilgoraj!
M31997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 12
ANNEX II
Manufacturer
Taric addi-
tional code
1 ‘Baumann Palety’ Sp.zo.o., Barczewo 8570
2 E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S.C., Snietnica 8571
3 F .P .H. ‘Tina’ S.C., Katowice 8572
4 Firma ‘Sabelmar’ S.C., Konczyce Male 85735 Z.P .H.U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa 85746 Internationale Paletten Company Sp., Lebork 85757 ‘Kross-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Kolobrzeg 85768 P .P .U.H. ‘Drewmax’ Sp.zo.o. (formerly P .P .H. ‘Drewnex’), Krakow 85779 P .P .H. ‘GKT’ S.C., Majdan Nowy 8584
10 P .P .H. ‘Unikat’, Aleksandrow IV 697 858611 P .P .H.U. ‘Adapol’ S.C., Wolomin 858712 P .P .H.U. ‘Alpa’ Sp.zo.o., Dobrzyca 8588
13 P .P .U.H. ‘Alwa’ Sp.zo.o., Tychowo 8589
14 P .P .H.U. ‘Palimex’ Sp.zo.o., Wloszakowice 859015 P .P .U.H. ‘SMS’ — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno 859116 P .T.H. ‘Mirex’, Kolobrzeg 859717 P .W . ‘Intur-KFS’ Sp.zo.o., Inowroclaw 866218 P .W . ‘Peteco’ Sp.zo.o., Warszawa 869019 ‘Paletex’ Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk, Warszawa 869120 Produkcja Palet ‘A. Adamus’, Kuznia Grabowska 869221 P .P .H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal 869322 ‘Scanproduct’ S.A., Czarny Dujanec 8715
23 S.U.T.R. ‘Rol Trak’, Prochowice 8714
24 ‘Transdrewneks’ Sp.zo.o., Grudziadz-Owczarki 871625 W .Z.P .U.M. ‘Euro-Tech’, Rakszawa 872526 Z.P .H. ‘Palettenwerk’ — K. Kozik, Jordanow 872627 Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S.C., Drawsko Pomorskie 874528 Z.P .H.U. ‘Sek-Pol’ Sp.zo.o., Tarnobrzeg 852629 ‘Euro-Mega-Plus’ Sp.zo.o., Kielce 852730 ‘C.M.C.’ Sp.zo.o., Andrychow, Inwald 852831 Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV 704 852932 Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gerka, Brodnica 8530
33 Z.P .H.U. ‘Drewnex’ S.C., Zelazkow 45 b 8531
34 Import-Export ‘Elko’ Sp.zo.o., Kalisz 853235 P .P .H.U. ‘Probox’, Import-Export, Kalisz 8533!
M31997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 13
Taric addi-
tional code
36 Drewpal S.C., Stawiszyn 8534
37 Zaman S.C., Radom 853538 ‘Marimpex’, Pulawy 853739 ‘AVEN’ Sp.zo.o., Kostrzyn 855840 P .P .H.U. ‘Eurex’ S.C., Godynice 853841 MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko 853942 ENKEL S.C., Pulawy 854043 Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W .i.T. HENSOLDT, Lebork 854144 P .P .U.H. ‘DREWPOL ’, Braszewice 883445 PTN Kruklanki Sp.zo.o., Krulanki 8556
46 WEDAM S.C., Stezyca 8557
47 Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow 855948 P .P .H.U. ‘Alk’, Bierzwnik 856149 ‘Empol’ S.C., Jastrzebniki 37 856050 Euro-Handels Sp.zo.o., Szczecin 844051 P .P .H. ‘Paletex’ Sibinski Jaroslaw, Czajkow 844152 Firma ‘KIKO’ S.C., Poznan 844353 ‘Enkel’ Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy 844454 Sliwka Lucyna, Klodzko 844555 Firma Borkowski S.C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna 8446
56 Produkcja-Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow 8483
57 ‘Bilusa’ Sp.zo.o., Klodawa 848458 P .P .U.H. PAL-POL S.C., Prabuty 848559 Firma ‘A.C.S.’ S.C., Kamien 848660 ‘SMT’ Sp.zo.o., Miastko 856261 Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni, Torun 856362 ‘Palko’ Sp.zo.o., Sedziszow 856563 ‘D & M & D’ Sp.zo.o., Blizanow 856664 P .P .H. ‘Vector’, Kalisz 856765 P .P .H.U. ‘ELMA’ S.C., Sobieseki A109
66 P .P .H. SWENDEX S.C., Lublin A110
67 P .P .H.U. Zbigniew Marek, Andrichow A11368 Pomorski Serwis Paletowy Sp.zo.o., Kobylnica A11469 ‘EMI’ S.C., Bilgoraj A12470 P .P .H.U. ROMAX Import-Eksport, Wroclaw A133!
M31997R2334 — EN — 15.07.2000 — 003.001 — 14