CS    CS  KOMISE EVROPSKÝCH SPOLE ČENSTVÍ 
V Bruselu dne 20.7.2005 
KOM(2005)328 v kone čném znění 
2005/0136(CNS)   
Návrh 
ROZHODNUTÍ RADY 
kterým se m ění rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES o finan čním příspěvku Spole čenství na 
programy kontroly rybolovu členských stát ů 
. 
(předložená Komisí) 
 
CS 2   CS ODŮVODNĚNÍ 
Společenství poskytuje členským stát ům finanční pomoc na kontrolu rybolovu od roku 1991. 
Tato politika je založena na skute čnosti, že kontrola rybolovu zahrnuje vysoké náklady, a to 
zejména na inspekce na mo ři prováděné s pomocí hlídkových plavidel  a letadel a na investice 
do technologií a sítí informa čních technologií. 
Vzhledem k t ěmto skute čnostem p řijala Rada čtyři rozhodnutí, která stanoví podporu 
Společenství pro výdaje členských stát ů v oblasti kontroly rybol ovu: Rozhodnutí 89/631/EHS 
pro období 1991–1995, rozhodnutí 95/527/EHS pro období 1996–2000, rozhodnutí 2001/431/ES pro období 2001–2003 a rozho dnutí 2004/465/ES pro období 2004 a 2005. 
Z analýzy výsledk ů tohoto režimu jasn ě vyplývá, že finan ční pomoc, kterou Spole čenství 
členským stát ům poskytuje, má velmi pozitivní v liv na jejich kontrolní systémy. 
Platnost rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES kon čí dnem 31. prosince 2005 a nový finan ční rámec pro 
oblast rybolovu (pro období 2007–2013) vstoupí v platnost až v roce 2007. Z tohoto d ůvodu 
je třeba prodloužit použitelnos t stávajícího finan čního režimu p řijatého v souladu 
s rozhodnutím 2004/465/ES o je den rok, aby podpora Spole čenství pro výdaje, které členské 
státy plánují na kontrolu rybol ovu, byla nadále k dispozici, dokud nevstoupí v platnost nový 
finanční režim, a za ú čelem podpory investic členských stát ů v této oblasti, p řičemž jsou 
rovněž zohledn ěny potřeby Agentury Spole čenství pro kontrolu rybolovu.  
Navrhované rozhodnutí je v podstat ě obnovením použitelnosti rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES 
o jeden rok. Priority a činnosti v rámci finan ční podpory poskytované Spole čenstvím 
zůstávají beze zm ěn a lhůty poskytované členským stát ům na předložení zprávy o dosaženém 
pokroku byly náležit ě upraveny. S cílem dále zvýšit úrove ň technické pomoci útvar ům 
Komise však byly p řidány dvě nové činnosti, které jsou vhodné z hlediska finan ční podpory 
Společenství. 
Zvláštní pozornost bude v ěnována pot řebám členských stát ů, které k Evropské unii 
přistoupily v roce 2004. 
Částka plánovaná na rok 2006 činí 35 milion ů EUR.  
Komise navrhuje Rad ě, aby připojený návrh p řijala. 
 
CS 3   CS 2005/0136(CNS) 
Návrh 
ROZHODNUTÍ RADY 
kterým se m ění rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES o finan čním příspěvku Spole čenství na 
programy kontroly rybolovu členských stát ů 
RADA EVROPSKÉ UNIE, 
s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského spole čenství, a zejména na článek 37 této 
smlouvy, 
s ohledem na návrh Komise1, 
s ohledem na stanovisko Evropského parlamentu2, 
vzhledem k t ěmto důvodům: 
(1) Spole čná rybářská politika (SRP) stanoví obecná pravidla pro zachování, řízení 
a odpovědné využívání živých vodních zdroj ů a jejich zpracování a uvád ění na trh. 
(2) Na řízení (ES) č. 2371/2002 ze dne 20. prosince 2002 o zachování a udržitelném 
využívání rybolovných zdroj ů v rámci spole čné rybářské politiky3 vyzvedlo pot řebu 
zvýšit spolupráci a koordinaci mezi členskými státy a s Komisí s cílem posílit kontrolu 
a odrazovat od chování odporujícího pravidl ům SRP.  
(3) Doba stanovená podle rozhodnutí Rady 2004/465/ES4 o finančním příspěvku na 
programy kontroly rybolovu členských stát ů končí 31. prosince 2005. 
(4) Vzhledem k domácím rozpo čtovým a administrativním problém ům obdržely členské 
státy, které ke Spole čenství přistoupily dne 1. kv ětna 2004, v rámci sou časného 
finančního režimu stanoveného rozhodnutím 2004/465/ES pouze velmi omezenou 
finanční podporu. 
(5) Nový finan ční výhled se vztahuje na období 2007–2013. V zájmu nep řerušování 
finanční podpory Spole čenství je proto nezbytné, aby tato podpora poskytovaná 
členským stát ům podle rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES byl a poskytována také b ěhem roku 
2006. 
                                                 
1 Ú ř. věst. C […], […], s. […]. 
2 Ú ř. věst. C […], […], s. […]. 
3 Ú ř. věst. L 358, 31.12.2002, s. 59. 
4 Ú ř. věst. L 157 ze dne 30.4.2004, s ; 114, oprava Ú ř. věst. L 195 ze dne 2.6.2004, s. 36. 
 
CS 4   CS (6) Je vhodné do rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES zahrnout studie o kontrole rybolovu 
a ustanovení, která usnad ňují zavád ění nových technologií kontroly rybolovných 
činností.  
PŘIJALA TOTO ROZHODNUTÍ:  
Článek 1 
Rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES se m ění takto: 
1) V článku 3 se odstavec 2 nahrazuje tímto: 
„2. Všechny členské státy p ředloží své ro ční programy kontroly r ybolovu na rok 2004 do 
1. června 2004 a na roky 2005 a 2006 do 31. ledna 2005.“ 
2) V čl. 4 odst. 1 se dopl ňují nová písmena, která zn ějí: 
„i) správní ujednání se Spole čným výzkumným st řediskem s cílem zavést nové technologie 
kontroly; 
j) studie o oblastech souvisejícíc h s kontrolou, které jsou vypracovány z podn ětu Komise.“  
3) V čl. 5 odst. 1 se první v ěta nahrazuje v ětou: „Finan ční referen ční částka na provád ění 
opatření, pro která se na období 2004 až 2006 poskytuje finan ční podpora, je 105 milion ů 
eur.“  
4) V čl. 6 odst. 2 se dopl ňuje toto písmeno: 
„d) u opat ření uvedených v čl. 4 odst. 1 písm. i) a j) m ůže sazba činit 100 % zp ůsobilých 
výdajů.“ 
5) V čl. 12 odst. 2 se datum „31. prosince 2008“ nahrazuje datem „31. prosince 2010“. 
6) V čl. 16 písm. b) se datum „31. prosince 2006“ nahrazuje datem „31. prosince 2007“. 
7) V čl. 16 písm. b) se bod v) nahrazuje tímto: 
„v) dopad finan čního příspěvku na programy kontroly ry bolovu za celé období 2001 až 
2006“. 
8) V článku 17 se datum „30. června 2007“ nahrazuje datem „30. června 2008“.  
Článek 2 
Toto rozhodnutí se použije  ode dne 1. ledna 2006. 
 
CS 5   CS Článek 3 
Toto rozhodnutí je ur čeno členským stát ům. 
V Bruselu dne 
 Za Radu 
 p ředseda 
 
CS 6   CS LEGISLATIVE FINA NCIAL STATEMENT  
1. NAME OF THE PROPOSAL:  
Community financial contribution towa rds Member States fisheries control 
programmes 
2. ABM / ABB FRAMEWORK  
Policy Area(s) concerned and a ssociated Activity/Activities: 
Line 1107: Fisheries conservation, control. 
3. BUDGET LINES  
3.1. Budget lines (operati onal lines and related technical and administrative 
assistance lines (ex- B.A lines)) including headings: 
11.07.02. Financial contribution to the Member States for expenditure in the 
field of control 
3.2. Duration of the action and of the financial impact: 
2006 
3.3. Budgetary characteristics ( add rows if necessary ): 
Budget 
line Type of expenditure New EFTA 
contribution Contributions 
from applicant 
countries Heading in 
financial 
perspective 
110702 Non-
comp  Diff5/ 
  NO NO NO No 3  
                                                 
5 Differentiated appropriations 
 
CS 7   CS 4. SUMMARY OF RESOURCES  
4.1. Financial Resources 
4.1.1. Summary of commitment appropriation s (CA) and payment appropriations (PA) 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 
Expenditure type Section 
no.  2006 2007 2008 2009 n 
+ 
4 n + 5 
and 
later Total 
Operational expenditure6         
Commitment 
Appropriations (CA) 8.1 a 35,000      35,000 
Payment Appropriations 
(PA)  b 3,000 7,000 14,000 11,000   35,000 
Administrative expenditure within reference amount7     
Technical & 
administrative assistance 
(NDA) 8.2.4 c        
TTOOTTAALL  RREEFFEERREENNCCEE  AAMMOOUUNNTT                
Commitment 
Appropriations  a+
c 35,000 
     35,000 
Payment 
Appropriations  b+
c 3,000 7,000 14,000 11,000   35,000 
Administrative expenditure not  included in reference amount8   
Human resources and 
associated expenditure (NDA) 8.2.5 d 0,378 0,378 0,378 0,378  
  
                                                 
6 Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned. 
7 Expenditure within article xx 01 04 of Title xx. 
8 Expenditure within chapter xx 01 other than articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05. 
 
CS 8   CS Administrative costs, other 
than human resources and 
associated costs, not 
included in reference amount 
(NDA) 8.2.6 e 0,055 0,12 0,020 0,020    
Total indicative financial cost of intervention 
TOTAL CA including 
cost of Human 
Resources  a+c
+d
+e 35,433 0,498 0,398 0,398   36,727 
TOTAL PA including 
cost of Human Resources  b+c+d+e 3,433 7,498 14,398 11,398 
  36,727 
Co-financing details 
If the proposal involves co-financing by Member  States, or other bodies (please specify 
which), an estimate of the level of this co-financing should be indicated in the table below (additional lines may be added if different  bodies are foreseen for the provision of 
the co-financing): 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 
Co-financing body 
 Year 
n n + 1 n + 2 n + 3 n + 4 n + 5 
and 
later  
Total 
…………………… f        
TOTAL CA including co-
financing a+c
+d+e+f        
4.1.2. Compatibility with Financial Programming 
x Proposal is compatible with existing financial programming. 
 Proposal will entail reprogramming  of the relevant heading in the 
financial perspective. 
 Proposal may require application of the provisions of the Inter-
institutional Agreement9 (i.e. flexibility instrument or revision of the 
financial perspective). 
4.1.3. Financial impact on Revenue 
                                                 
9 See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional agreement. 
 
CS 9   CS x Proposal has no financial implications on revenue 
 Proposal has financial impact – the effect on revenue is as follows: 
NB: All details and observations relati ng to the method of calculating the  effect 
on revenue should be shown in a separate annex. 
EUR million (to one decimal place) 
  Situation following action 
Budget line Revenue Prior to
action  
[Year 
n-1]  [Year n]
 [n+1] [n+2] [n+3
] [n+4]  [n+5]
10 
a) Revenue in absolute terms         
b) Change in revenue  ∆       
(Please specify each revenue budget line involved, adding the appropriate 
number of rows to the table if there is an effect on more than one budget line.) 
4.2. Human Resources FTE (including offici als, temporary and external staff) – see 
detail under point 8.2.1. 
Annual requirements 2006 2007 2008 2009 n + 4 n + 5 
and 
later 
Total number of 
human resources 3 + ½ 3+ 1/2 3 + 1/2 3 + ½   
                                                 
10 Additional columns should be added if necessary i.e. if the duration of the action exceeds 6 years 
 
CS 10   CS 5. CHARACTERISTICS AND OBJECTIVES 
Details of the context of the proposal are required in the Explanatory 
Memorandum. This section of the Legislat ive Financial Statement should include 
the following specific complementary information: 
5.1. Needs to be met in the short or long term 
The objective of the Common Fisheries policy is to provide for sustainable exploitation 
of living aquatic resources and of aquaculture in the context of sustainable development. 
In order to ensure the effective implemen tation of the CFP (control, inspection and 
enforcement of the rules of the CFP falls with in the responsibility of Member States), the 
Community control and enforcement system for fisheries should be reinforced and co-
operation and co-ordination between all releva nt authorities should be strengthened.  
This goal is being achieved through a number of actions performed by Member States 
which have been financed by the Community since 1990, and consequently in line with 
the objectives established under Council Re gulation n° 2371/2002 on the conservation 
and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the CFP11. The financial 
assistance granted to Member States by the Community has been done on the basis of 
national programmes on expenditure for fisheries control purposes. 
5.2. Value-added of Community involvemen t and coherence of the proposal with 
other financial instruments and possible synergy 
Regulation n°2371/200212 establishes the obligations of Member States on fisheries 
control activities. However, without c onstant pressure and monitoring by the 
Commission, Member States will not fulfil their duties in accordance with the standards 
required by Community law. Furthermore, improvements towards an efficient control system throughout the Community will be difficult to achieve without incentives, in 
particular when new technologies shall be  tested and introduced where appropriate.  
5.3. Objectives, expected results and related indicators of the proposal in the context 
of the ABM framework 
Objectives:  The situation as regards control means of Member States seems to be very 
much the same as in the beginning of 2004. Under-capacities in fishing control are especially significant for new Member Stat es. It is thus necessary that Community 
financial assistance continues to be available to Member States in 2006 in the form and 
conditions established under Decision 2004/465
13. 
                                                 
11 JO L 358, 31.12.2002. 
12 See Art.23 (2) of R.n°2371/2002. 
13 A detailed exposé on this issue is to be found in point 5 (“Description and Grounds” of the 
Legislative Financial Statement of Decision 2004/465/EC. 
 
CS 11   CS Results:  Financing rates and conditions establis hed under Decision 2004/465/EC remain 
unchanged, and are made appl icable under the proposed Decision for one further year 
until 31.12.2006.  
In particular, reimbursement on aircraft and vessel expenditure will continue to be 
applied under the proposed Decision with priority to the new Member States. 
Indicators: The Commission will continue to focu s on the assessment tools that can be 
considered the best indicators to assess the effectiveness of the policy (i.e. number of 
infringements  detected over a period, the rate of procedures  ended compared with the 
procedures opened, the number of inspections  at sea or at ports, or the number of 
sightings  recorded by the aerial surveillance). The information provided by IT systems 
able to collect data from la nding points, thus controlling the level of catch uptake (in 
regard to available quotas and the status of stocks), are also important assessment 
elements.  
5.4. Method of Implementation (indicative) 
Show below the method(s)14 chosen for the implementation of the action. 
x Centralised Management 
x Directly by the Commission 
 Indirectly by delegation to: 
 Executive Agencies 
 Bodies set up by the Communities as referred to in art. 185 of 
the Financial Regulation 
 National public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service 
mission 
 Shared or decentralised management 
 With Member states 
 With Third countries 
 Joint management with international organisations (please specify) 
Relevant comments:
                                                 
14 If more than one method is indicated please provide additional details in the "Relevant comments" 
section of this point 
 
CS 12   CS 6. MONITORING AND EVALUATION  
6.1. Monitoring system 
The proposed Decision carries over for 2006 the principles and rules established in 
Decision 2004/465/EC on this issue. Expenditure must have been incurred in compliance 
both with the general condition specified in Decision 2004/465/EC and the specific conditions provided for by the future Commission decision fixing the amount granted.  
On its side, the Commission may require Member States to carry out on-the-spot checks 
on projects or may decide to carry them out with its own officials. 
The Commission maintains as well all existing checks and balances in regard to fraud: in 
particular, in the event any amount has been unduly paid, it shall be repaid to the 
Commission, with interest. It is worth noting that the Commission only reimburses invoices that the national ad ministrations have paid.  
Member States shall report yearly to the Commission how their programmes are 
implemented, any variation they had to introduce on their programmes and shall assess 
the impact of the expenditure on control, inspection and surveillance activities. The proposed Decision provides for a final a ssessment on the 2001-2006 programmes to be 
forwarded to the Commission in 2007. 
The proposed Decision foresees that the repor t by the Commission on the outcome of the 
scheme will be sent to the European Parlia ment and the Council in 2008. In this report 
indicators mentioned above will be used  to gauge the impact of this scheme. 
6.2. Evaluation 6.2.1. Ex-ante evaluation 
Through the financial scheme pr ovided for by Decisions 89/631
15, 95/52716, 2001/43117 
and 2004/46518, Member States have with no doubt reinforced their control structures and 
their inspectors’ skills. This has been larg ely assessed in several documents, such as 
Commission’s Reports on the monitoring of  the implementation of the CFP Rules by the 
Member States. Extensive details on the effect s of such actions have also been given in 
the Legislative Financial Statement of Counci l Decision 2004/465/EC, in the Report of 
the Commission to the Council and European Parliament on Decision 89/63119, the 
Report of May 2000 on Decision 95/52720 and the Commission Communication on the 
compliance with the rules of the CFP of June 2003, which set up a Compliance 
                                                 
15 JO L 364, 14.12.1989. 
16 JO L 301, 14.12.1995. 
17 JO L 154, 9.6.2001. 
18 JO L 157, 30.4.2004, as amended by JO L 195, 2.6.2004. 
19 COM(1995) 268. 
20 See Legislative Financial Statement to Decision 2004/465/EC, point 5. 
 
CS 13   CS scoreboard and was made available to the general public through the Commission's web-
site21.  
If an overall conclusion is to be drawn fr om these documents, is that without further 
investments in equipment and training, the control systems of Member States will not be 
able to correspond to the standards required by Community law.  
In addition, attention must be drawn to the fact that ten new Member States joined the 
Community on 1st May 2004, and that during 2004 some of these Member States faced 
internal budgetary problems which have made them have to delay certain expenditure on 
fisheries control for one or two years. Hence, in order to facilitate and speed up the 
attainment of Community standards in the fisheries control field, financial aid will continue to be necessary in the interim pe riod between the expiry of Decision 2004/465 
(i.e. 31.12.2005) and the date when the future Fisheries Control Agency becomes fully 
operational. 
6.2.2. Measures taken following an interm ediate/ex-post evaluation (lessons learned 
from similar experiences in the past) 
Though assessment is very much dependant on specific monitoring, control and 
surveillance strategies adopted by each Member  States (which are in turn a consequence 
of the different features of the fleet, the size of fishing grounds, quantity and value of 
catches landed), it appears that there is still room for improvement on the main issues of 
control i.e. patrol vessels and aircraft and technology systems and their network, the 
fitting on board of Vessel Monitoring Systems on board vessels, and training, the 
enhancement of pilot projects and cost/benefit analysis of expenditure in the control activity (in the case of all Member States). 
Moreover, it is proposed to finance two new actions: the first will be aimed at setting up 
administrative arrangements with the Community  Joint Research Centre (JRC), so that 
this body may provide technical assistance in the development of control techniques. The second will allow the Commission’s services to carry out studies on matters related to 
control issues. 
6.2.3. Terms and frequency of future evaluation The proposed Council Decision only affects the reports foreseen in Decision 
2004/465/EC (articles 16 and 17) in their timi ng. All other elements of reporting already 
foreseen remain unchanged.  
The final report to be drawn up by the Memb er States before 31.12.2007 will allow a 
thorough ex post evaluation of the scheme which will be presented the following year by 
the Commission to the European  Parliament and the Council. 
                                                
 
21 COM(2003) 344. 
 
CS 14   CS In the matter of control, it is not easy to qu antify the results, especially in the short term. 
The overall goal of this initiative is to en hance a control culture among the stakeholders 
in the fisheries sector which will allow an unreserved compliance with the CFP rules. 
Without effective control, conservation rules are useless; without adherence to rules, control activities will never be successful. 
7. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES  
The Member States shall verify and certify that expenditure for which a reimbursement is 
claimed has been incurred in compliance with the rules laid down by the Decision. If the 
Commission considers that the claim does not comply with the conditions laid down, it 
shall refuse to reimburse all or pa rt of the expenditure at issue. 
The Members States shall provide the Commission with any information it may request 
and they must keep supporting documents available to the Commission for at least 5 years from the date of reimbursement. 
Commission officials may carry out or take part on ex-post control.  In the event of irregularity, any amount unduly paid shall be repaid to the Commission, 
together with interest. 
 
CS 15   8. DETAILS OF RESOURCES  
8.1. Objectives of the proposal in terms of their financial cost 
Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 
Year n Year n+1 Year n+2 Year n+3 Year n+4 Year n+5 and 
later TOTAL (Headings of Objectives, actions 
and outputs should be provided) Type of 
output Av. 
cost 
No. 
outputs Total 
cost No. 
outputs Total 
cost No. 
outputs Total 
cost No. 
outputs Total 
cost No. 
outputs Total 
cost No. 
outputs Total 
cost No. 
outputs Total 
cost 
OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE 
No.1 22                 
Action 1:  computer 
technology and IT networks .    6,000             
Action 2:  remote control 
technology .    2 , 5 0 0              
Action 3:  pilot projects on 
new technologies remote 
control technology .    1,000             
Action 4:  training and 
exchange programmes of 
control department officials    2,500             
Action 5:  inspection and 
observer pilot schemes    2,000             
Action 6:  assessment of 
public expenditure in the 
control area     2 , 0 0 0              
Action 7:  seminars and media    1,000             
                                                 
22 As described under Section 5.3 
 
CS 16   Action 8: acquisition and 
modernisation of control, 
inspection and surveillance 
equipment .    15,000             
Action 9: Administrative 
arrangements with the Joint 
Research Centre aimed at 
implementing new 
technologies on control    2,000             
Action 10: Studies on control 
related areas carried out at the 
initiative of the Commission    1 , 0 0 0              
TOTAL COST    35,000             
 
CS 17   CS 8.2. Administrative Expenditure 
8.2.1. Number and type of human resources 
Types of 
post  Staff to be assigned to management of the action using existing and/or additional 
resources ( number of posts/FTEs ) 
  2006 2007 2008 2009 Year n+4 Year n+5 
A*/AD 1 A/AD 1 A/AD 1 A/AD 1 A/AD   Officials 
or temporary 
staff
23 
(XX 01 
01) B*, 
C*/AST 2 B/AST 
½ C/AST 2 B/AST 
½ C/AST 2 B/AST 
½ C/AST 2 B/AST 
½ C/AST   
Staff financed24 by 
art. XX 01 02       
Other staff25 
financed by art. XX 01 04/05       
TOTAL        
8.2.2. Description of tasks deriving from the action 
– - In view of the principle of sound fi nancial management, assure the respect 
of the Financial Regulation rules when implementing the concerned Community legislation. 
– - Assure a good execution of available cr edits, in conformity with applicable 
rules and procedures. 
8.2.3. Sources of human resources (statutory) (When more than one source is stated, please indicate the number of posts originating 
from each of the sources) 
x Posts currently allocated to the management of the programme to be 
replaced or extended 
 Posts pre-allocated within the APS/PDB exercise for year n
 
 Posts to be requested in the next APS/PDB procedure 
                                                 
23 Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount 
24 Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount 
25 Cost of which is included within the reference amount 
 
CS 18   CS  Posts to be redeployed using exis ting resources within the managing 
service (internal redeployment) 
 Posts required for year n although not foreseen in the APS/PDB exercise 
of the year in question 
 
CS 19   CS 8.2.4. Other Administra tive expenditure include d in reference amount (XX 01 04/05 – 
Expenditure on administrative management)  
EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 
Budget line 
(number and heading) Year 
n Year 
n+1 Year 
n+2 Year 
n+3 Year 
n+4 Year 
n+5  
and 
later TOTAL 
1 Technical and administrative 
assistance (including related staff costs)        
Executive agencies26        
Other technical and administrative assistance        
- intra muros  
- extra muros        
Total Technical and administrative 
assistance        
8.2.5. Financial cost of human resources and associated costs not  included in the 
reference amount 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 
Type of human resources 2006 2007 2008 2009 Year n+4 Year n+5  
and later 
Officials and temporary staff 
(XX 01 01) 0, 378  0, 378  0, 378  0, 378  
  
Staff financed by Art XX 01 02 
(auxiliary, END, contract staff, 
etc.) 
(specify budget line)       
Total cost of Human 
Resources and associated 
costs (NOT in reference 
amount) 0, 378 0, 378 0,378 0, 378   
                                                 
26 Reference should be made to the specific legislative financial statement for the Executive 
Agency(ies) concerned. 
 
CS 20   CS Calculation– Officials and Temporary agents  
Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable 
3 x €108 000 = € 324 000 
½ x €108 000 = €54 000 
Calculation– Staff financed under art. XX 01 02  
Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable 
8.2.6 Other administrative expenditure not  included in reference amount 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 
 2006 2007 2008 2009 Year 
n+4 Year 
n+5 
and 
later TOTAL 
XX 01 02 11 01 – Missions 0,020  0,020 0,020 0,020   0,080 
XX 01 02 11 02 – Meetings & Conferences        
XX 01 02 11 03 – Committees27  0,035      0,035 
XX 01 02 11 04 – Studies & consultations  0,10     0,10 
XX 01 02 11 05 – Information systems        
2 Total Other Management Expenditure 
(XX 01 02 11)        
3 Other expenditure of an 
administrative nature (specify including 
reference to budget line) 
        
Total Administrative expenditure, other 
than human resources and associated 
costs (NOT included in reference 
amount) 0,055 0,12 0,020 0,020   0,215 
Calculation - Other administrative expenditure not  included in reference amount  
                                                 
27 Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.