Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2012 —Trevisanato v Commission(Case C-25/12 P)
Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Application seeking an order that the Commission take a position concerning the interpretation and the transposition of a
directive — Manifest inadmissibility
1.                     Appeals — Grounds — Error of law relied on not identified — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court
of Justice, Art. 58(1); Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 15-18)
2.                     Judicial proceedings — Decision taken by way of reasoned order — Conditions — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly
lacking any legal basis — Order delivered without a defence having been submitted — Lawfulness (Rules of Procedure of the
General Court, Art. 111) (see paras 21-23)
Re:
Appeal against the Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 December 2011 in Case T-510/11
Trevisanato
v
Commission
, in which the General Court dismissed an action seeking an order that the Commission take a position on the complaint lodged
by the applicant — Failure by the Commission to adopt a binding opinion on the scope of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July
1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies — (OJ 1998 L 225, p. 16) —
Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Conditions for application of Article 111 of the Rules and Procedures
of the General Court
Operative part
1.
The appeal is dismissed.
2.
Mr Trevisanato is ordered to bear his own costs.