62024CO0766_SUM
Case C‑766/24
Criminal proceedings
v
AB
(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Protodikeio Peiraios)
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 February 2025
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Scope – Judgment ordering the committal of a person to a facility for offenders with mental illness – Suspension subject to that person undergoing medical treatment)
Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Principle ne bis in idem – Scope – Judgment declaring that a person cannot be held criminally responsible for the acts committed due to a psychiatric condition and ordering that person’s committal to a facility for offenders with mental illness – Committal measure accompanied by a conditional suspension – Initiation, in another Member State, of criminal proceedings against that person for the same acts – Not permissible
(Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 50; Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, Art. 54)
(see paragraphs 20-34, operative part)
See the text of the decision.