62022CO0170_INF
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022 –FJ and Others v EEAS
(Case C‑170/22 P)
(Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
1.
Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissibility
(Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))
(see paragraphs 4 [4, 5, 7], 5)
2.
Judicial proceedings – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Brief statement of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Abstract statement – Inadmissibility
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 169)
(see paragraphs 4[6], 5)
3.
Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the facts or evidence have been distorted
(Art. 256(1), second subpara., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d))
(see paragraphs 4[8], 5)
Operative part
1.
The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.
2.
FJ and Others shall bear their own costs.