62022CO0784_INF
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2025 –Solvay Sodi
(Case C‑784/22)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Need for interpretation of EU law to enable the referring court to give judgment – None – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
1.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – General or hypothetical questions – No connecting factor between the dispute in the main proceedings and the provision of EU law referred to in the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU)
(see paragraphs 31, 32)
2.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Need to provide the Court with sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context – Statement of the reasons for requiring an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Scope
(Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 94)
(see paragraphs 33-44)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad – Varna (Administrative Court Varna, Bulgaria), made by decision of 16 December 2022, as completed by decision of 20 May 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.