Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 September 2010 – Icebreaker v OHIM – Gilmar (ICEBREAKER)
(Case T-112/09)
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark ICEBREAKER – Earlier national word mark ICEBERG – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Partial refusal to register – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 22, 48)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 January 2009 (Case R 1536/2007-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Gilmar SpA and Icebreaker Ltd.
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Icebreaker Ltd
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark ICEBREAKER for goods in Classes 9, 24 and 25 – Application No 3205523
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Gilmar SpA
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Italian trade mark registration of the word mark ICEBERG for goods in Class 25; international trade mark registration of the word mark ICEBERG for goods in Class 25; Spanish trade mark registration of the word mark ICEBERG for goods in Class 25; Italian trade mark registration of the word mark ICE for goods in Class 25; international trade mark registration of the word mark ICE for goods in Class 25
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition partially upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
Operative part
The Court:
1.
Dismisses the action;
2.
Orders Icebreaker Ltd to pay the costs.