ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber)
24 July 2024 (*)
(Rectification)
In Joined Cases T-309/22 and T-739/22,
Vladimir Rashevsky, residing in Moscow (Russia), represented by G. Lansky, P. Goeth and A. Egger, lawyers,
applicant,
v
Council of the European Union, represented by J. Rurarz and P. Mahnič, acting as Agents,
defendant,
THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),
composed of D. Spielmann, President, R. Mastroianni and I. Gâlea (Rapporteur), Judges,
Registrar: V. Di Bucci,
makes the following
Order
The Court delivered the judgment on 10 July 2024 Rashevsky v Council (T-309/22 and T-739/22, not published, EU:T:2024:455).
In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure, it is necessary to rectify obvious inaccuracies found in paragraphs 80, 86, 108, 110, 124, 134, 138, 158, 159, 160, 161, 163, 169, 171, 172, 174, 185, 190, 192, 194, 198, 199 and 223 of that judgment.
On those grounds,
THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber)
hereby orders:
1.      In paragraph 80 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 75’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 79’.
2.      In paragraph 86 of the judgment, ‘paragraphs 71 to 76’ must be read instead of ‘paragraphs 75 to 80’.
3.      In paragraph 108 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 58’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 62’.
4.      In paragraph 110 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 55’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 59’.
5.      In paragraph 124 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 18’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 19’.
6.      In paragraph 134 of the judgment, ‘paragraphs 131 and 132’ must be read instead of ‘paragraphs 135 and 136’ and ‘paragraph 92’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 96’.
7.      In paragraph 138 of the judgment, ‘paragraphs 106 to 121’ must be read instead of ‘paragraphs 110 to 125’.
8.      In paragraph 158 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 90’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 94’.
9.      In paragraph 159 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 91’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 95’.
10.    In paragraph 160 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 153’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 157’.
11.    In paragraph 161 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 145’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 149’.
12.    In paragraph 163 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 153’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 157’.
13.    In paragraph 169 of the judgment, ‘paragraphs 136 to 155’ must be read instead of ‘paragraphs 140 to 159’.
14.    In paragraph 171 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 141’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 145’.
15.    In paragraph 172 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 132’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 136’.
16.    In paragraph 174 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 155’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 159’ and ‘paragraphs 156 to 160’ must be read instead of ‘paragraphs 160 to 164’.
17.    In paragraph 185 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 140’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 144’.
18.    In paragraph 190 of the judgment, ‘paragraphs 188 and 189’ must be read instead of ‘paragraphs 192 and 193’.
19.    In paragraph 192 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 143’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 147’.
20.    In paragraph 194 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 145’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 149’.
21.    In paragraph 198 of the judgment, ‘paragraphs 152 and 165’ must be read instead of ‘paragraphs 156 and 169’.
22.    In paragraph 199 of the judgment, ‘paragraphs 185 to 190’ must be read instead of ‘paragraphs 189 to 194’.
23.    In paragraph 223 of the judgment, ‘paragraph 198’ must be read instead of ‘paragraph 202’ and ‘paragraphs 165, 175 and 200’ must be read instead of ‘paragraphs 169, 179 and 204’.
Luxembourg, 24 July 2024.
V. Di Bucci
D. Spielmann
Registrar
President
* Language of the case: English.