62022CO0250_INF
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2022 –Fallimento Villa di Campo
(Case C‑250/22) (
1
)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement that the national court indicate the relationship between the provisions of EU law the interpretation of which is sought and the national legislation applicable to the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
1.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Need to provide the Court with sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context – Statement of the reasons for requiring an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Scope
(Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 94)
(see paragraphs 16, 17)
2.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(c))
(see paragraphs 20, 23-26)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling lodged by the Corte suprema di Cassazione (Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy) by decision of 31 March 2022 is manifestly inadmissible.
(
1
)	OJ C 266, 11.7.2022.