62022TO0612_INF
Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 March 2023 –Primicerj v Commission
(Case T‑612/22) (
1
)
(Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Initial refusal of access – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Request for the Court to issue directions – Lack of jurisdiction)
1.
Action for annulment – Actionable measures – Concept – Acts producing binding legal effects – Initial statement of position on a request for access to Commission documents – Not included
(Art. 263 TFEU; European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 7 and 8)
(see paragraphs 13-18)
2.
Action for annulment – Jurisdiction of the EU judicature – Claim seeking that directions be issued to an institution – Not permissible
(Art. 263 TFEU)
(see paragraph 26)
Operative part
1.
The action is dismissed in part on the ground of clear lack of jurisdiction and in part for being manifestly inadmissible.
2.
There is no longer any need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Mr Gabriele Di Girolamo, Ms Roberta Tesei and the Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace (ANGDP).
3.
Ms Paola Primicerji shall pay the costs.
4.
Mr Di Girolamo, Ms Tesei and the ANGDP shall bear their own costs relating to their application for leave to intervene.
(
1
)	OJ C 432, 14.11.2022.