62023CO0032_INF
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 September 2023 –QI v Commission
(Case C‑32/23 P)
(Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – Appraisal reports – Manifest error of assessment – Action for annulment – Respect for the rules of objectivity and impartiality – Errors of law – Instances of distortion of the clear sense of the evidence – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Appeal – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted – Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence – Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion – Requirement that the distortion be obvious from the documents in the file
(Art. 256(1), second subpara., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)
(see paragraphs 4(14-16, 31, 32, 35, 39, 40), 5)
Operative part
1.
The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.
2.
QI shall bear her own costs.