62022CO0444_INF
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2023 –Veen v Europol
(Case C‑444/22 P) (
1
)
(Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Non-contractual liability – Law enforcement cooperation – Criminal intelligence – Alleged unauthorised disclosure of data – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-material damage – Action for damages – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
1.
Appeal – Grounds – Ground of appeal raising substantive arguments relating to a complaint that was rejected as inadmissible – Inadmissibility of the complaint as found by the General Court not called into question – Inadmissibility
(Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)
(see paragraphs 34, 35)
2.
Appeal – Grounds – Inadequate statement of reasons – Scope of the obligation to state reasons
(Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Arts 7, 8 and 48; European Parliament and Council Regulation 2016/794, Art. 18)
(see paragraphs 50-57)
Operative part
1.
The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
2.
Mr Leon Leonard Johan Veen shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol).
(
1
)	OJ C 340, 5.9.2022.