Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 – ClaimCompass II
(Case C‑19/25)
( Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility )
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information regarding the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – No explanations as regards the relationship between the provisions and principles of EU law set out by the referring court and the national legislation applicable to the dispute in the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 94(c))
(see paragraphs 16-33, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Sofia District Court, Bulgaria), made by decision of 15 January 2025, is manifestly inadmissible.