Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 July 2014 —
Kastenholz v OHIM
(Case C‑435/13 P) 1(1)
Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Community designs — Articles 4 to 6, 25(1)(b) and (f), and 52 — Registered Community design representing watch dials — Earlier Community design — Invalidity proceedings
1.                     Appeals — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d)) (see paras 30-32)
2.                     Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 33)
3.                     Appeals — Grounds — Specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning necessary (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paras 41-43)
Operative part
1.
The appeal is dismissed.
2.
Mr Kastenholz is ordered to pay the costs.
1 – OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.