62018TJ0173_INF
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020 –Ramazani Shadary v Council
(Case T‑173/18)
(Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality)
1.
Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds of persons undermining the rule of law or contributing to the commission of acts that constitute serious human rights violations – Minimum requirements
(Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282, Annex II)
(see paras 33, 35-37)
2.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds of persons undermining the rule of law or contributing to the commission of acts that constitute serious human rights violations – Obligation to identify in the statement of reasons individual and specific reasons justifying such measures – Decision falling within a context known to the person concerned, enabling him to understand the scope of the measure taken against him
(Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decision 2010/788/ CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282, Annex II)
(see paras 34, 42-46)
3.
EU law – Principles – Rights of defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds of persons undermining the rule of law or contributing to the commission of acts that constitute serious human rights violations – Obligation to disclose individual and specific grounds for the decisions adopted – Obligation to enable the person concerned effectively to put forward his point of view on the grounds held against him – Scope
(Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 41(2)(a); Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282, Annex II)
(see paras 50, 51, 53)
4.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Rights of defence – Subsequent decision maintaining the name of the applicant on the list of persons covered by those measures – No new grounds – Obligation for the Council to disclose to the person concerned new evidence taken into account during its periodic review of the restrictive measures – Communication of new evidence to the person concerned for his observations – None – Infringement of the rights of the defence
(Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282, Art. 9(2) and Annex II)
(see paras 55-62, 65, 68)
5.
EU law – Principles – Rights of defence – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Obligation for the Council to disclose to the person concerned new evidence taken into account during its periodic review of the restrictive measures – Scope – Unlawfulness of the act depending on proving the procedural relevance of the infringement of that obligation – No effect in the present case
(Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282, Annex II)
(see paras 69-72, 74, 77)
6.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Scope – Persons involved in planning, directing or committing acts that constitute serious human rights violations or abuses – Definition – Persons who have committed such acts in the past, notwithstanding the lack of evidence establishing current involvement in such acts – Included – Interpretation corroborated by the possibility of renewing the restrictive measures – Effectiveness
(Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decisions (CFSP) 2016/2231 and (CFSP) 2017/2282, Arts 3(2)(b) and 9(2))
(see paras 82-85, 87)
7.
European Union – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Scope of the review – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list annexed to the contested decision by virtue of his duties – Documents publicly available establishing serious human rights violations – Probative value – Principle of the unfettered assessment of the evidence
(Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282, Annex II)
(see paras 95-97, 102, 103)
8.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds of persons undermining the rule of law or contributing to the commission of acts that constitute serious human rights violations – Criteria – Roles conferring responsibility for the repression of the civil population or compliance with the rule of law – Error of assessment – None
(Council Decision 2010/788/ CFSP, as amended by Decisions (CFSP) 2016/2231 and (CFSP) 2017/2282, Annex II)
(see paras 112-115)
9.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds of persons undermining the rule of law or contributing to the commission of acts that constitute serious human rights violations – Restrictions on the right to property – Breach of principle of proportionality – None
(Arts 3(5), 21(2)(b) and (c) and 29 TEU; Art. 215(2) TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Arts 17(1) and 52(1); Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decisions (CFSP) 2016/2231 and (CFSP) 2017/2282, Art. 5(1))
(see paras 120-133)
10.
EU law – Principles – Fundamental rights – Presumption of innocence – Decision to freeze funds taken against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Compatibility with that principle – Conditions
(Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 48(1); Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282, Arts 5(1) and 9)
(see paras 136-141)
11.
Plea of illegality – Scope – Measures the illegality of which may be pleaded – General measure providing the basis of the contested decision – Need for a legal connection between the contested measure and the contested general measure – None – Inadmissibility
(Art. 277 TFEU; Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, Art. 3(2)(b); Council Regulation No 1183/2005, Art. 2b(1)(b))
(see paras 145, 146)
12.
European Union – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions – Restrictive measures directed against the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Scope of the review – Restricted review for general rules – Criteria for adopting restrictive measures – Involvement in planning, directing or committing acts that constitute serious human rights violations – Scope – Compliance with the principle of legal certainty requiring clarity, precision and foreseeability of the effects of legal rules
(Arts 3(5) and 21(2)(b) and (c) TEU; Art. 275, second para. TFEU; Council Decisions 2010/788/CFSP, Art. 3(2)(b) and (CFSP) 2016/2231, Recitals 3 and 4; Council Regulation No 1183/2005)
(see paras 147-157)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.
Operative part
The Court:
1.
Dismisses the action;
2.
Orders Mr Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary to pay the costs.