Action brought on 25 February 2019 — Necci v Commission
(Case T-129/19)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Claudio Necci (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
annul the decision of 18 April 2018 rejecting his application for membership of the JSIS;
order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on one main plea in law and one alternative plea in law.
Primarily, he claims that the European Commission infringed Article 95 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants (‘the CEOS’) by refusing to admit him as a member of the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme (JSIS), without taking into account the additional contribution period granted to him in the pension scheme of the institutions of the Union in consideration for the transfer of his national pension rights.
In the alternative, the applicant raises an objection of illegality in respect of Article 95 of the CEOS having regard to Article 45 of the TFEU.
____________