62020TJ0355_INF
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2022 –Krasnyj Octyabr v EUIPO – Pokój (Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA)
(Case T‑355/20) (
1
)
(EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA – Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
1.
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b), and 53(1)(a))
(see paras 21-23, 92)
2.
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Determination of the relevant public – Attention level of the public
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b), and 53(1)(a))
(see paras 25, 26)
3.
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Figurative mark Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA – International figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b), and 53(1)(a))
(see paras 30-32, 34, 49, 52-55, 60, 69, 75, 83, 84, 91, 97-103)
4.
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment – Composite mark – Determination of the dominant element or elements
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b), and 53(1)(a))
(see paras 39-41, 50, 51)
Operative part
The Court:
1.
Dismisses the action;
2.
Orders PAO Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyj Octyabr’ to pay the costs.
(
1
)	OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.