62020CO0636_INF
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2021 –Tolnatext
(Case C‑636/20) (
1
)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Union Customs Code – Article 22(6) – Article 29 – Right to be heard – Procedures initiated ex officio – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Insufficient information as to the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Request not explaining why reference to the Court is necessary – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(c))
(see paras 18-20, 23, 24, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék (Pécs Court, Hungary), made by decision of 30 October 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.
(
1
)	OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.