62019CO0860_INF
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 – Magnan v Commission
(Case C‑860/19 P)
(Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for failure to act, for damages and for annulment – Freedom of movement for workers – Freedom of occupation – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
1.
Appeal – Grounds – Error of law relied on not identified – Ground lacking precision – Inadmissibility
(Art. 256 TFEU; Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d))
(see paras 26, 29)
2.
Appeal – Grounds – Infringement of a rule of law – Failure to act by the Commission – Clearly unfounded ground of appeal – Rejection
(Art. 17(1), TEU; Arts 263 and 265 TFEU)
(see paras 38, 39)
3.
Appeal – Grounds – Error of law by the judge hearing the application for interim measures – Grounds in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded – Rejection
(Art. 17(1) TEU; Arts 256 and 265 TFEU; EC-Switzerland Agreement on Free Movement of Persons)
(see paras 44, 46-49)
4.
Appeal – Grounds – Error of law by the judge hearing the application for interim measures – Ground in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded – Rejection
(Art. 256 TFEU)
(see paras 52-54)
5.
Appeal – Grounds – Error of law by the judge hearing the application for interim measure – Non-recognition of the strict liability of the European Union – Ground in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly ineffective – Rejection
(Arts 256, 268 and 340 TFEU)
(see paras 57-59)
Operative part
1.
The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.
2.
Mr Nathaniel Magnan shall bear the costs.