62024CO0122_INF
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2024 –Oblastna direktsia na MVR – Veliko Tarnovo
(Case C‑122/24)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
1.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information concerning the factual background and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Impossibility for the Court to determine the applicability and relevance of the provisions of EU law relied on – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(a) and (c))
(see paragraphs 17-23, 37, operative part)
2.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – Request for an interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Impossibility for the Court to determine the applicability and relevance of other provisions of EU law relied on – Manifest inadmissibility
(Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 51(1); Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 53(2); European Parliament and Council Directive 2006/126)
(see paragraphs 25-27, 34-37, operative part)
Operative part
The request for preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Administrative Court, Varna, Bulgaria), by decision of 31 January 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.