62021TO0295_INF
Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 February 2022 –eSlovensko v Commission
(Case T‑295/21)
(Action for annulment – Financial provisions – EU programme on promoting safer use of the internet – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility)
1.
Proceedings – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Identification of the subject matter of the dispute – Summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para., and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d) and (e))
(see paras 15-18)
2.
Action for annulment – Action relating in reality to a contractual dispute – Annulment of a debit note issued by the Commission – Lack of jurisdiction of the EU judicature – Inadmissibility
(Arts 263 and 299 TFEU)
(see paras 28-30)
3.
Action for annulment – Action relating in reality to a contractual dispute – Reclassification of the action – Conditions
(Arts 263 and 272 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d))
(see para. 31)
4.
Action for annulment – Jurisdiction of the EU judicature – Claim seeking that directions be issued to an institution – Claim for a declaratory judgment – Inadmissibility
(Arts 263 and 266 TFEU)
(see para. 40)
Operative part
1.
The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.
eSlovensko shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.