62023CO0387_INF
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 January 2024 –BUL INS
(Case C‑387/23) (
1
)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
1.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Request not explaining why reference to the Court is necessary – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(c))
(see paragraphs 23, 29, operative part)
2.
Approximation of laws – Insurance against civil liability in respect of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103 – Determining the rules of civil liability applicable to road traffic accidents – Competence of the Member States – Limits
(European Parliament and Council Directive 2009/103, Arts 1, point 2, and 3, second and fourth paras)
(see paragraphs 25-28)
3.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – Request for an interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – No indication of the links to EU law – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 51(1); Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 53(2))
(see paragraphs 30, 31, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (District Court, Sofia, Bulgaria), made by decision of 26 June 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.
(
1
)	OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.