62023CO0775_INF
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2025 –Bursa Română de Mărfuri (Legal monopoly for intermediation services in the electricity sector)
(Case C‑775/23)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of the Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Inadmissibility)
1.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Need to provide the Court with sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context – Extent of the obligation in the sphere of competition – Insufficient information regarding that context – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94)
(see paragraphs 23-30, 42)
2.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Need to provide the Court with sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context – Scope of the obligation in the context of the fundamental freedoms – Question raised concerning a dispute confined within a single Member State – No indication as to the connecting factor making the requested interpretation necessary to resolve the dispute – Inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94)
(see paragraphs 31-33, 35, 37)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Court of Appeal, Bucharest, Romania), made by decision of 6 October 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.