62022CO0506_INF
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2023 –SNI
(Case C‑506/22)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)
1.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Request not explaining why reference to the Court is necessary – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(c))
(see paragraphs 18, 20-22, 26-29, operative part)
2.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Limits – Clearly irrelevant questions and hypothetical questions put in a context not permitting a useful answer
(Art. 267 TFEU)
(see paragraph 19)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Judecătoria Câmpina (Court of First Instance, Câmpina, Romania) by decision of 1 July 2022 is manifestly inadmissible.