62024CO0625_INF
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025 –ClaimCompass
(Case C‑625/24)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Limits – Clearly irrelevant questions and hypothetical questions put in a context not permitting a useful answer – Questions referred without sufficient explanation regarding the need for an answer enabling the referring court to give its decision – Circumstances arising subsequent to the reference for a preliminary ruling – Request made by the Court of Justice to the referring court concerning the reasons for making the reference to the Court of Justice – No useful answer – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 94(c))
(see paragraphs 22-34, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Sofia District Court, Bulgaria), made by decision of 24 September 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.