Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2025 – OU v Commission
(Case C‑13/25 P)
( Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Lack of clarity and precision of the grounds of appeal – Appeal manifestly inadmissible )
1.      Appeal – Grounds – Error of law relied on not identified – Ground lacking precision – Inadmissibility
(Art. 256(1), second subpara., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))
(see paragraphs 13, 14, 17, 18)
2.      Appeal – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the facts or evidence have been distorted
(Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)
(see paragraph 20)
Operative part
1.
The appeal is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.
OU shall bear his own costs.