62022CO0190_INF
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 October 2023 –Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
(Case C‑190/22) (
1
)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the legislative context – Absence of explanations as regards the link between the provisions and principles of EU law relied on by the referring court and the national legislation applicable to the dispute in the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(b) and (c))
(see paragraphs 18-22, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Rimini (Rimini Magistrate, Italy), made by decision of 7 March 2022, received at the Court on 7 March 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.
(
1
)	OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.