62022CO0635_INF
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2023 –Assofrutti Rom
(Case C‑635/22) (
1
)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common Agricultural Policy – Financial support for investments in tree plantations – Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information regarding the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – No connecting factor between the dispute in the main proceedings and the provision of EU law referred to in the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(b) and (c))
(see paragraphs 24-34, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Curtea de Apel Timişoara (Court of Appeal, Timișoara, Romania), by decision of 30 June 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.
(
1
)	OJ C 24, 23.1.2023.