ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition)
22 August 2025 (*)
( Rectification )
In Case T-144/24,
Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen BV, established in Hoogeveen (Netherlands), represented by H. Roerdink, lawyer,
applicant,
v
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by T. Klee and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents,
defendant,
the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO being
Sören Pürschel, residing in Frankfurt am Main (Germany),
THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition),
composed of S. Papasavvas, President, A. Kornezov (Rapporteur), D. Petrlík, K. Kecsmár and S. Kingston, Judges,
Registrar: V. Di Bucci,
having regard to the judgment of 9 July 2025, (T‑144/24, EU:T:2025:700),
makes the following
Order
1        The Court delivered the judgment of 9 July 2025, Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen v EUIPO – Pürschel (BIENENBEISSER), T‑144/24, EU:T:2025:700.
2        In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure, it is necessary to rectify an obvious inaccuracy found in paragraph 37 of that judgment.
On those grounds,
THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition)
hereby orders:
In paragraph 37 of the judgment, ‘As regards the question whether goods are part of a homogeneous category of goods which is not capable of being subdivided into several independent subcategories, it follows from case-law that …’ must be read instead of ‘As regards the question whether goods are part of a homogeneous category of goods which may be subdivided into several independent subcategories, it follows from case-law that …’.
Luxembourg, 22 August 2025.
V. Di Bucci
S. Papasavvas
Registrar
President
* Language of the case: English.