ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber)
17 March 2016 (1)
(Rectification)
In Case T‑73/12,
Einhell Germany AG, established in Landau an der Isar (Germany),
Hans Einhell Nederlands BV, established in Breda (Netherlands),
Einhell France SAS, established in Villepinte (France),
Hans Einhell Österreich GmbH, established in Vienna (Austria),
represented by R. MacLean, Solicitor, and A. Bochon, lawyer,
applicant,
v
European Commission, represented by A. Stobiecka-Kuik, K. Talabér-Ritz and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents,
defendant,
ACTION for the partial annulment of Commission Decisions C(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final and C(2011) 8810 final of 6 December 2011 concerning applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid on imports of certain compressors originating in the People’s Republic of China,
THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber),
composed of  H. Kanninen, President, I. Pelikánová and E. Buttigieg (Rapporteur), Judges,
Registrar: E. Coulon,
makes the following
Order
1        The General Court has delivered judgment in Case T-73/12.
2        In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the parties having been given an opportunity to submit their written observations pursuant to Article 164(3) of those rules, it is necessary to rectify clerical mistakes found in the subject-matter of the action, as set out in the introductory part of the judgment, in paragraphs 13 and 19 of the judgment, and in paragraph 1 of the operative part of the judgement.
On those grounds,
THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber)
hereby orders:
1)      In the subject-matter of the action, as set out in the introductory part of the judgment, ‘Action for the partial annulment of Commission Decisions C(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final and C(2011) 8810 final of 6 December 2011’ must be read instead of ‘Action for the partial annulment of Commission Decisions K(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final and K(2011) 8810 final of 6 December 2011’;
2)      In paragraph 13 of the judgment, ‘on 6 December 2011, the Commission adopted Decisions C(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final, and C(2011) 8810 final’ must be read instead of ‘on 6 December 2011, the Commission adopted Decisions K(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final, and K(2011) 8810 final’;
3)      In paragraph 19 of the judgment, ‘in Decision C(2011) 8831 final, the Commission granted the application for a refund made by Einhell Germany in the amount of EUR 157 950.76’ must be read instead of ‘in Decision K(2011) 8831 final, the Commission granted the application for a refund made by Einhell Germany in the amount of EUR 157 950.76’, and ‘in Decision C(2011) 8810 final, the Commission granted the application for a refund made by Hans Einhell Österreich in the amount of EUR 1 800.09’ must be read instead of ‘in Decision K(2011) 8810 final, the Commission granted the application for a refund made by Hans Einhell Österreich in the amount of EUR 1 800.09’;
4)      In paragraph 1 of the operative part of the judgment, ‘Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decisions C(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final and C(2011) 8810 final of 6 December 2011’ must be read instead of ‘Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decisions K(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final and K(2011) 8810 final of 6 December 2011’.
Luxembourg, 17 March 2016.
E. Coulon
H. Kanninen
Registrar
President
1 Language of the case: English.