62022TO0110_INF
Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022 –Kremer v Commission
(Case T‑110/22) (
1
)
(Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional years of pensionable service – Action for annulment – Request for repayment of transferred capital which has not given rise to a crediting of additional years of pensionable service – Time limit for complaints – Unjust enrichment – Manifest inadmissibility)
1.
Actions brought by officials – Prior administrative complaint – Time limits – Mandatory – Time-barred – Reopening – Condition – New and material fact – Concept – Limits
(Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91)
(see paragraphs 27-29, 36-44)
2.
Actions brought by officials – Prior administrative complaint – Time limits – Mandatory – Time-barred – Reopening – Condition – Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure – Concept – Limits
(Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91)
(see paragraphs 45-49)
3.
EU law – Principles – Principle of prohibition of unjust enrichment of the Union – Remedy – Actions for damages – Condition – Unlawfulness or fault with regard to the defendant’s conduct – No such condition
(Arts 268 and 340 TFEU)
(see paragraph 54)
4.
Actions brought by officials – Actions for damages – Action alleging unjust enrichment on the part of the European Union – Action brought without a pre-litigation procedure in accordance with the Staff Regulations – Inadmissibility
(Arts 268 and 340 TFEU; Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91)
(see paragraphs 57-60)
Operative part
1.
The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.
2.
Ms Christiane Kremer is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those of the European Commission.
3.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union are to bear their own costs.
(
1
)	OJ C 158, 11.4.2022.