62019CO0622_INF
Order of the Court (chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 November 2019 — Luz Saúde v EUIPO
(Case C‑622/19 P) (
1
)
(Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
1.
Appeal — System whereby the Court determines whether an appeal should be allowed to proceed — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Burden of proof
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)
(see para. 10)
2.
Appeal — System whereby the Court determines whether an appeal should be allowed to proceed — Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed — Formal requirements — Scope
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)
(see paras 11-13)
3.
Appeal — System whereby the Court determines whether an appeal should be allowed to proceed — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate the significance of the issue — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)
(see paras 14-19)
Operative part
1.
The appeal is not allowed to proceed.
2.
Luz Saúde, SA, shall bear its own costs.
(
1
)	OJ C 432, 23.12.2019.