62022CO0748_INF
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 February 2025 –Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others(Remuneration of honorary judges and public prosecutors II)
(Case C‑748/22)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of EU law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Need to provide the Court with sufficient information regarding the factual context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 94(a) and (c))
(see paragraphs 23-36, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Arcidosso (Arcidosso Magistrate, Italy), made by decision of 25 November 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.