62021CO0779
ORDER OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber)
15 January 2025 (
*1
)
(Rectification of judgment – Articles 154 and 159a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Obvious inaccuracies – None)
In Joined Cases C‑779/21 P-REC and C‑799/21 P-REC,
TWO APPEALS under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 14 December 2021 and 16 December 2021 respectively,
European Commission, represented initially by A. Bouquet, F. Castillo de la Torre, F. Clotuche‑Duvieusart and B. Eggers, acting as Agents, and subsequently by A. Bouquet, D. Calleja Crespo, F. Clotuche‑Duvieusart and B. Eggers, acting as Agents,
appellant in Case C‑779/21 P,
supported by:
Kingdom of Spain, represented by L. Aguilera Ruiz and A. Gavela Llopis, acting as Agents,
intervener in the appeal,
the other parties to the proceedings being:
Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia-el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario), represented by G. Devers, avocat,
applicant at first instance,
Council of the European Union,
defendant at first instance,
French Republic, represented initially by J.‑L. Carré, A.‑L. Desjonquères and T. Stéhelin, acting as Agents, and subsequently by G. Bain, B. Herbaut, T. Stéhelin and B. Travard, acting as Agents,
Confédération marocaine de l’agriculture et du développement rural (Comader), represented by N. Angelet, G. Forwood and A. Hublet, avocats, and by N. Forwood, Barrister-at-Law,
interveners at first instance,
and
Council of the European
Union, represented initially by F. Naert and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents, and subsequently by F. Naert, A. Nowak‑Salles and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents,
appellant in Case C‑799/21 P,
supported by:
Kingdom of Belgium, represented initially by J.‑C. Halleux, C. Pochet and M. Van Regemorter, acting as Agents, and subsequently by C. Pochet and M. Van Regemorter, acting as Agents,
Kingdom of Spain, represented by L. Aguilera Ruiz and A. Gavela Llopis, acting as Agents,
Hungary, represented by M.Z. Fehér and K. Szíjjártó, acting as Agents,
Portuguese Republic, represented by P. Barros da Costa and A. Pimenta, acting as Agents,
Slovak Republic, represented initially by B. Ricziová, acting as Agent, and subsequently by S. Ondrášiková, acting as Agent,
interveners in the appeal,
the other parties to the proceedings being:
Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia-el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario), represented by G. Devers, avocat,
applicant at first instance,
French Republic, represented initially by J.‑L. Carré, A.‑L. Desjonquères and T. Stéhelin, acting as Agents, and subsequently by G. Bain, B. Herbaut, T. Stéhelin and B. Travard, acting as Agents,
European Commission, represented initially by A. Bouquet, F. Castillo de la Torre, F. Clotuche‑Duvieusart and B. Eggers, acting as Agents, and subsequently by A. Bouquet, D. Calleja Crespo, F. Clotuche‑Duvieusart and B. Eggers, acting as Agents,
Confédération marocaine de l’agriculture et du développement rural (Comader), represented by N. Angelet, G. Forwood and A. Hublet, avocats, and by N. Forwood, Barrister-at-Law,
interveners at first instance,
THE COURT (Grand Chamber),
composed of K. Lenaerts, President, C. Lycourgos, I. Jarukaitis, M.L. Arastey Sahún, S. Rodin, A. Kumin, N. Jääskinen (Rapporteur) and M. Gavalec, Presidents of Chambers, A. Arabadjiev, E. Regan and Z. Csehi, Judges,
Advocate General: T. Ćapeta,
Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,
after hearing the Advocate General,
makes the following
Order
1
On 4 October 2024, the Court (Grand Chamber) delivered the judgment in Commission and Council v Front Polisario (C‑779/21 P and C‑799/21 P, EU:C:2024:835) (‘the judgment at issue’).
2
By letter lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 24 October 2024, supplemented by a corrigendum received at that registry on 6 November 2024, the European Commission submitted a request for rectification of paragraphs 127 and 128 of the judgment at issue pursuant to Article 154 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, applicable to appeal proceedings pursuant to Article 190(1) of those rules.
3
By letters lodged at the Court Registry on 25 and 28 October 2024 respectively, the French Republic and the Kingdom of Spain, on the basis of the same provisions, requested that the Court rectify paragraph 127 of the judgment at issue.
4
Pursuant to Article 159a of the Rules of Procedure, where a request or an application referred to in Chapter 9 of Title IV of those rules – which includes Article 154 thereof – is, in whole or in part, manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded, the Court may, having heard the Judge-Rapporteur and the Advocate General, at any time decide to dismiss it, in whole or in part, by reasoned order.
5
It is appropriate to apply Article 159a of the Rules of Procedure in the present cases.
6
In support of their respective requests for rectification of paragraph 127 of the judgment at issue, the Commission, the French Republic and the Kingdom of Spain claim, in essence, that that paragraph is vitiated by an inaccuracy, inasmuch as it cannot be held that it was ‘without being contradicted in that regard’ that the representative of the Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia-el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) indicated, during the hearing before the Court of Justice, that, ‘to date, of a total of around 500000 Sahrawi, approximately 250000 are living in refugee camps in Algeria, another quarter are living in the area of Western Sahara which is under Moroccan control, and the remaining quarter are living in other parts of the world’.
7
In that regard, they maintain that it is apparent from the Commission’s report of 11 June 2018 on the benefits for the population of Western Sahara of the extension of tariff preferences to products originating in Western Sahara and on the consultation of that population on the said extension (SWD(2018) 346 final), to which reference is made in, inter alia, paragraph 337 of the judgment of 29 September 2021, Front Polisario v Council (T‑279/19, EU:T:2021:639), which is the judgment under appeal in the cases giving rise to the judgment at issue, as well as in paragraph 38 of the judgment at issue, that, ‘while a sizeable portion of the Sahrawi population lives outside the territory of Western Sahara, a major portion does live in the territory’. Moreover, according to footnote 19 to that report, although, as no census has been taken of the members of the people of Western Sahara living outside the territory of Western Sahara, it has not been possible to quantify those members, they represent – according to the source under consideration – between 20% and 50% of the people of Western Sahara. The Commission states that it was also apparent from its report of 22 December 2021 on the benefits for the population of Western Sahara of the extension of tariff preferences to products originating in Western Sahara (SWD(2021) 431 final), appended by Front Polisario to its response before the Court of Justice, that the Commission is not in a position to carry out such a census. According to the information available to the Commission, such a census has, to date, never been carried out. In addition, the French Republic and the Kingdom of Spain argue that it was apparent from the written pleadings of the Council of the European Union, both in connection with the case which gave rise to the judgment of 29 September 2021, Front Polisario v Council (T‑279/19, EU:T:2021:639), and in connection with those giving rise to the judgment at issue, that carrying out a census of the members of the people of Western Sahara and, a fortiori, identifying the proportion of those members which lives in the territory of Western Sahara and the proportion which lives outside that territory are part of a complex problem which, to date, remains unresolved and which is currently the subject of work being conducted by the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (Minurso). The French Republic states that it referred to those elements during the hearing before the Court of Justice.
8
In support of its request for rectification of paragraph 128 of the judgment at issue, the Commission submits (i) that it cannot be inferred from the remarks made by its agents during that hearing that, ‘according to [its] estimates …, only 25% [of the population of Western Sahara] is of Sahrawi origin’, (ii) that it is apparent from the reports referred to in the preceding paragraph that there is no precise census of the population of Western Sahara and that that institution is not in a position to carry out such a census, and (iii) that, following a question which was put to it during the hearing, it explicitly contested the assertion that the members of the population residing in the territory of Western Sahara which are of Sahrawi origin represent 25% of that population.
9
As a preliminary point, it should be borne in mind that, under Article 154(1) of the Rules of Procedure, obvious inaccuracies in a judgment may be rectified by the Court, inter alia, at the request of a party.
10
In the first place, as regards paragraph 127 of the judgment at issue, it is common ground that, during the hearing before the Court of Justice, Front Polisario’s representative provided a rough estimate of the number of persons comprising the people of Western Sahara and of how those persons are distributed geographically across the world. As the Kingdom of Spain notes in its request for rectification, neither its representative nor the representative of another party has disputed the figures put forward as estimates by Front Polisario’s representative at that hearing and reproduced in paragraph 127 of the judgment at issue.
11
In any event, it must be pointed out that the statements set out in that paragraph are not at odds with the report of 11 June 2018 or the report of 22 December 2021 referred to in paragraph 7 of the present order; nor, more generally, are they at odds with the Council’s written pleadings. Indeed, paragraph 127 of the judgment at issue, which expressly emphasises the fact that the estimates presented by Front Polisario’s representative at that hearing are approximate in nature, does not in any way appear to be irreconcilable with (i) the statement that a major portion of the people of Western Sahara lives in that territory, (ii) the statement that the Commission was not in a position to carry out a census of the members of that people who live outside that territory and that different estimates coexist in that regard, and (iii) the Council’s statement that carrying out a precise census of the members of that people is part of a complex problem currently forming the subject of work conducted by the United Nations.
12
In the second place, regarding paragraph 128 of the judgment at issue, it must be observed that the Commission itself acknowledges, in its request for rectification, that it stated during the hearing before the Court of Justice that ‘a quarter of the inhabitants [of Western Sahara] “could” be of Sahrawi origin’, without however indicating the exact number of persons who could be regarded as being members of that people.
13
First, that paragraph faithfully reflects that statement by the Commission, because, in that paragraph, the Court uses the conditional form and refers only to estimates. In that context, the clarification given by the Commission at the hearing before the Court of Justice, in response to a question which had been put to it, that it did not intend to make a political statement in that regard cannot be understood as meaning that it intended to retract that statement. Second, in its request for rectification, the Commission gives an incorrect reading of paragraph 128 of the judgment at issue. The Commission claims that it did not state at any time during the hearing that, ‘according to [its] estimates …, only 25% [of the population of Western Sahara] is of Sahrawi origin’. According to that institution, the use of such wording could – incorrectly – suggest that those estimates were made by the Commission itself. However, it is expressly stated in paragraph 128 of the judgment at issue that it is ‘according to the estimates provided by the Commission at the hearing before the Court of Justice’, and not according to the estimates made by the Commission itself, that only 25% of the population of Western Sahara is of Sahrawi origin. Accordingly, that paragraph indicates only that the Commission referred to the estimates in question at that hearing; by contrast, it is not possible to infer from this that the Court suggested in that paragraph that the Commission itself was the person who had made those estimates.
14
Consequently, it cannot be held that paragraphs 127 and 128 of the judgment at issue are vitiated by ‘obvious inaccuracies’ for the purposes of Article 154 of the Rules of Procedure.
15
It follows from all of the foregoing that, pursuant to Article 159a of the Rules of Procedure, the requests for rectification of paragraphs 127 and 128 of the judgment at issue must be dismissed as manifestly unfounded.
On those grounds, the Court (Grand Chamber) hereby orders:
1.
The requests of the European Commission, the French Republic and the Kingdom of Spain for rectification of paragraph 127 of the judgment of 4 October 2024, Commission and Council v Front Polisario (C‑779/21 P and C‑799/21 P, EU:C:2024:835), are dismissed as manifestly unfounded.
2.
The request of the European Commission for rectification of paragraph 128 of the judgment of 4 October 2024, Commission and Council v Front Polisario (C‑779/21 P and C‑799/21 P, EU:C:2024:835), is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.
[Signatures]
(
*1
)	Language of the case: French.