62022CO0619_INF
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 –Sinda & V R
(Case C‑619/22)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to set out the relationship between the provisions of European Union law of which an interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the legislative context – Absence of explanations as regards the link between the provisions and principles of EU law relied on by the referring court and the national legislation applicable to the dispute in the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(b) and (c))
(see paragraphs 16-19, 21, 23, 29, 30, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Zemgales rajona tiesa (District Court, Zemgale, Latvia), by decision of 20 September 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.