Information;Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2022:445
Date: 2022-07-13
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Third Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded

Action brought on 2 September 2021 – Purasac v EUIPO – Prollenium Medical Technologies (Rejeunesse) (Case T-543/21) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Purasac Co. Ltd (Anyang-si, Republic of Korea) (represented by: P. Lee, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Prollenium Medical Technologies, Inc. (Aurora, Ontario, Canada) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Rejeunesse – Application for registration No 18 117 313 Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2021 in Case R 146/2021-4 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the contested decision; order EUIPO to pay the costs. Plea in law Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the erroneous assessment of the likelihood of confusion between the trade marks. ____________