Information;Order — ECLI:EU:T:2024:923
Date: 2024-12-20
Language of the case: Spanish
Court formation: Fifth Chamber
Subject matter: Budget;Financial provisions
Procedure: Action for annulment;Application for interim measures
Origin: Spain

Action brought on 20 September 2024 – Inescop v Commission (Case T-500/24) Language of the case: Spanish Parties Applicant: Asociación de Investigación para la Industria del Calzado y Conexas (Inescop) (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: C. Morales Ruiz, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul in its entirety the decision of the Directorate-General for Research and Innovation of 23 July 2024 ordering the recovery of certain eligible costs and the payment of liquidated damages on the ground that the statutory limitation period in respect of any irregularities committed in the DES-MOLD, SOHEALTHY and PILOT-APB projects, of four years, in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests, 1 had expired; in the alternative, in the event that the principal claim is not upheld, annul in its entirety the decision of the Directorate-General for Research and Innovation of 23 July 2024 ordering the recovery of certain eligible costs and the payment of liquidated damages on the ground that the statutory limitation period in respect of any irregularities committed in the DES-MOLD, SOHEALTHY and PILOT-APB projects, of five years, in accordance with (i) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, 1 applicable ratione temporis to the DES-MOLD project, and (ii) Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, 2 applicable ratione temporis to the SOHEALTHY and PILOT-APB projects, had expired; in the further alternative, in the event that the previous claim is not upheld, (i) annul in its entirety the decision of the Directorate-General for Research and Innovation of 23 July 2024 ordering the recovery of certain eligible costs and the payment of liquidated damages and order, if necessary, that a new procedure – in which Inescop’s linguistic rights are guaranteed – be initiated and (ii), consequently, order the provision to Inescop of a copy in Spanish of each and every communication, decision, ruling and report from the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), so that it can properly defend itself in inter partes proceedings. Pleas in law and main arguments In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law. First plea in law, alleging failure to observe the principles of legality, the hierarchy of norms and legal certainty in relation to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests and infringement of the case-law of the courts and tribunals of the European Union interpreting it. Second plea in law, alleging failure to observe the principles of legality, the hierarchy of norms and legal certainty in relation to the financial regulations of the European Union. Third plea in law, alleging failure to observe the principle of legal certainty and infringement of the case-law of the courts and tribunals of the European Union developing it. Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the fundamental right to address the European Commission in one of the Treaty languages and to obtain a response in the same language. ____________ 1 OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1. 1 OJ 2002 L 248, p. 1. 1 OJ 2012 L 298, p. 1.