Judgment — ECLI:EU:C:2004:486
Date: 2004-09-07
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Grand Chamber
Based on: Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (1957)
Subject matter: Right of establishment;Freedom to provide services
Concepts: The various activities;The various services
Procedure: Action for failure to fulfil obligations - unfounded
Origin: France

Summary of the Judgment Freedom of movement for persons – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Direct insurance other than life assurance – Directive 92/49 – Freedom to set rates – Bonus-malus system not resulting in the direct setting of premium rates by the State – Permissible (Council Directive 92/49) A bonus-malus system applicable to motor insurance contracts which, while having effects on changes in the amount of premiums, does not, however, result in the direct setting of premium rates by the State since insurance undertakings remain free to set the amount of the basic premium cannot be equated with a system of approving premium rates that is contrary to the principle of freedom to set rates laid down by Directive 92/49 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and amending Directives 73/239 and 88/357. Full harmonisation in the field of non-life insurance rates precluding any national measure liable to have effects on rates cannot be presumed in the absence of a clearly expressed intention to this effect on the part of the Community legislature. (see paras 24-25)