Information;Order — ECLI:EU:C:2019:946
Date: 2019-10-31
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - unfounded;Appeal - inadmissible
Origin: Germany

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 October 2019 — Hochmann Marketing v Council (Case C‑408/19 P) (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Letter of the Council of the European Union stating that it is not entitled to modify the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Act not open to challenge — Manifest inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded) 1. Appeal — Grounds — Grounds which are manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded — Dismissal at any point, by reasoned order, without an oral procedure (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181) (see paras 10, 11) 2. Action for annulment — Actionable measures — Concept — Measures producing binding legal effects — Letter of the Council of the European Union stating that it is not entitled to modify the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Not included (Art. 263, sixth para., TFEU) (see para. 18) 3. Appeal — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Manifest inadmissibility (see paras 20-22) 4. Appeal — Grounds — Inadequate statement of reasons — Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning — Whether permissible — Conditions (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 117, 119 and 126) (see paras 23, 24) 5. Judicial proceedings — Decision taken by way of reasoned order — Possibility of ruling without an oral procedure — Manifestly inadmissible action (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 126) (see paras 25-28) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. 2. Hochmann Marketing GmbH shall bear its own costs.