Order — ECLI:EU:C:2012:288
Date: 2012-05-10
Language of the case: Romanian
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Subject matter: Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties;Anti-discrimination;Fundamental rights
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling - inadmissible
Origin: Romania

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa (Romania) lodged on 12 March 2012 - Corpul Naţional al Poliţiştilor - Biroul Executiv Central (on behalf of and in the interest of its members - public officials with a special status - police serving with the IPJ Tulcea) v Ministerul Administraţiei şi Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliţiei Române, Inspectoratul de Poliţie al Judeţului Tulcea (Case C-134/12) Language of the case: Romanian Referring court Curtea de Apel Constanţa Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Corpul Naţional al Poliţiştilor - Biroul Executiv Central (on behalf of and in the interest of its members - public officials with a special status - police serving with the IPJ Tulcea (the Tulcea Inspectorate of Police)) Defendant: Ministerul Administraţiei şi Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliţiei Române, Inspectoratul de Poliţie al Judeţului Tulcea Questions referred Must the provisions of Articles 17(1), 20 and 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding reductions in remuneration such as those imposed by the Romanian State under Law No 118/2010 and Law No 285/2010? Must the provisions of Article 15(3) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, whereby the Romanian Government was required to inform the Secretary General of the Council of Europe of its intention to adopt measures to reduce remuneration and to specify the time-limit laid down for implementing them, be interpreted as rendering invalid Law No 118/2010 and Law No 285/2010? ____________