Order — ECLI:EU:T:2018:388
Date: 2018-06-26
Language of the case: French
Court formation: President of the Chamber
Subject matter: Public procurement in the European Union
Procedure: Action for annulment;Application for interim measures - inadmissible
Origin: Belgium

Order of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Strabag Belgium v Parliament (Case T-784/17) 1 (Action for annulment — Public works contracts — Tender procedure — General contractor works for European Parliament buildings in Brussels — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers — Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate) Language of the case: French Parties Applicant: Strabag Belgium (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: initially by M. Schoups, K. Lemmens and M. Lahbib, and subsequently by M. Schoups and K. Lemmens, lawyers) Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z. Nagy and B. Simon, acting as Agents) Re: Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 24 November 2017 rejecting the applicant’s tender and awarding to five tenderers a framework contract involving general contractor works for Parliament buildings in Brussels (Belgium) (call for tenders 06D20/2017/M036) and, second, an order for the Parliament to produce various documents. Operative part of the order 1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action; 2. The European Parliament is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures; 3. The head of claim requesting that the Parliament be ordered to pay ‘procedural compensation’ is rejected as inadmissible. ____________ 1 OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.