Order — ECLI:EU:C:2016:830
Date: 2016-10-27
Language of the case: Dutch
Court formation: Eighth Chamber
Subject matter: Right of establishment;Freedom to provide services;Fundamental rights;Charter of Fundamental Rights
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling - inadmissible
Origin: Belgium

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van Koophandel Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 5 October 2015 — Uber Belgium BVBA v Taxi Radio Bruxellois NV, Other parties: Uber NV and Others (Case C-526/15) Language of the case: Dutch Referring court Rechtbank van Koophandel Brussel Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Uber Belgium BVBA Defendant: Taxi Radio Bruxellois NV Other parties to the proceedings: Uber NV and Others, Brusselse Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, Belgische Federatie van Taxis, Nationale Groepering van Ondernemingen met Taxi- and Locatievoertuigen met Chauffeur VZW Question referred Should the principle of proportionality, laid down in Article 5 TEU and Article 52(1) of the Charter, 1 read in conjunction with Articles 15, 16 and 17 of the Charter and with Articles 28 TFEU and 56 TFEU, be interpreted as precluding a rule such as that laid down in the Ordonnantie van het Brusselse Hoofstedelijk Gewest van 27 april 1995 betreffende de taxidiensten voor het verhuren van voertuigen met vervoerder (Ordinance of the Brussels-Capital Region of 27 April 1995 relating to taxis and services for the rental of vehicles with carrier), be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘taxi services’ (‘taxidiensten’) also applies to unpaid individual carriers who are involved in ride sharing (shared transport) by accepting ride requests which they are offered by means of a software application of the companies Uber BV et al established in another Member State? ____________ 1 OJ 2000 C 364, p. 1.