Order — ECLI:EU:C:2016:301
Date: 2016-04-21
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Ninth Chamber
Subject matter: Free movement of goods;Common customs tariff;Customs Union
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - unfounded;Appeal - inadmissible
Origin: Spain

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 April 2016 — Makro autoservicio mayorista and Vestel Iberia v Commission (Joined Cases C‑264/15 P and C‑265/15 P) (1) Appeal — Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 181 — Article 263 TFEU — Situation of a person not directly affected by the decision under appeal — Customs union — Subsequent entry in the accounts and remission of import duties — Reception apparatus for colour television sets from Turkey 1. Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Whether directly concerned — Criteria — Commission decision post-clearance entry of import duties in the accounts but not justifying the remission of those duties in a particular case — Application for remission of customs duties — Commission referring the national authorities to a decision concerning another importer — Action by importers subject to the national decision but not the Commission decision — Not directly concerned — Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 45-50, 62, 63) 2. Appeals — Grounds — Plea against a ground of the judgment not necessary to support the operative part — Invalid plea in law (see para. 52) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Makro autoservicio mayorista SA and Vestel Iberia SL are ordered to pay the costs. 3. The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs. 1 – OJ C 294 du 7.9.2015.