Information;Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2025:320
Date: 2025-03-19
Language of the case: Dutch
Subject matter: Competition;Dominant position
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Belgium

summary and superficial determinations. Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission incorrectly assessed the interests of the Union. The Commission wrongly took the position that the infringements raised by the applicant appear to be limited to one Member State, thereby misunderstanding the international scope of the facts. The Commission also took no account of the duration of the infringements and wrongly drew the conclusion that the national courts and authorities were well placed to evaluate the anti-competitive practices cited by the applicant. ____________