Information;Order — ECLI:EU:T:2020:26
Date: 2020-01-29
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Fourth Chamber
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Subject matter: Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Procedure: Staff cases - unfounded;Staff cases - inadmissible

summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para. and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paras 59, 60) 2. Officials — Organisation of departments — Assignment of staff — Administration’s discretion — Scope — Judicial review — Limits — Official’s duty of cooperation and loyalty (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 7) (see paras 77, 78) 3. Officials — Decision adversely affecting an official — Obligation to state reasons — Scope (Art. 296 TFEU; Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 25, second para.) (see para. 82) 4. EU law — Principles — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons for decisions adversely affecting an official (Art. 296 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 41) (see paras 83, 84) Re: Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the EEAS’s decision of 27 November 2017 imposing a salary deduction amounting to 72 calendar days and, second, in so far as necessary, the EEAS’s decision of 2 May 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 3 January 2018. Operative part 1. The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded in law. 2. WV is ordered to pay the costs.