Order — ECLI:EU:C:2014:2080
Date: 2014-07-15
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - inadmissible
Origin: United Kingdom

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 July 2014 — Zoo Sport v OHIM (Case C‑676/13 P) Appeal — Community trade mark — Word mark ZOOTSPORT — Opposition by the proprietor of Community figurative and word marks containing the word elements ‘ZOOT’ and ‘SPORTS ZOOT SPORTS’ — Refusal in part of registration 1. Appeals — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see para. 17) 2. Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 21, 22) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Zoo Sport Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.