Judgment — ECLI:EU:C:2000:474
Date: 2000-09-21
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Based on: Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (1957)
Subject matter: Dumping;External relations;Commercial policy
Concepts: Appeals;Pleas in law;Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - unfounded

summary of this judgment defines as 'ineffective a plea in law which, even had it been accepted, would still have had no bearing on the operative part. 16: - The appellant cites Case C-53/92 P Hilti v Commission [1994] ECR I-667, Case C-362/95 P Blackspur and Others v Council and Commission [1997] ECR I-4775, and the order in Case C-19/95 P San Marco v Commission [1996] ECR I-4435. 17: - Paragraph 66 of the judgment. 18: - Paragraph 87. 19: - Paragraph 89. 20: - Paragraph 84, which refers to Case C-69/89 Nakajima v Council [1991] ECR I-2069, paragraph 108, and Case C-49/88 Al-Jubail Fertilizer v Council [1991] ECR I-3187, paragraphs 15 and 17. 21: - The appellant cites Case C-56/93 Belgium v Commission [1996] ECR I-723, paragraph 5, and Case T-380/94 AIUFFASS and AKT v Commission [1996] ECR II-2169, paragraph 64.