Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2004:340
Date: 2004-11-23
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Fifth Chamber
Based on: Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (1957)
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Concepts: Actions before the Community Courts
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Germany

Summary of the Judgment Community trade mark – Appeals procedure – Appeals before the Community judicature – Challenging the Board of Appeal’s definition of the relevant public for the purposes of the examination of the distinctive character of the mark applied for – Change in the subject-matter of the dispute – None (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 135(4); Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b)) It is for the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to ascertain the relevant public in the course of its examination of distinctive character, within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, of a sign for which registration as a mark is sought. By challenging the Board of Appeal’s definition of the relevant public for the purposes of the examination of the distinctive character of the mark applied for in breach of Article 135(4) of the Rules of Procedure, the applicant is not asking the Court to rule on questions which are different from those brought before the Board of Appeal. (see paras 34-35)