Judgment;Summary — ECLI:EU:C:2019:7
Date: 2019-01-10
Language of the case: Dutch
Court formation: First Chamber
Subject matter: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters;Police cooperation;Area of freedom, security and justice
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Netherlands

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Nederland (Netherlands) lodged on 12 February 2018 — Openbaar Ministerie v ET (Case C-97/18) Language of the case: Dutch Referring court Rechtbank Noord-Nederland, sitting in Leeuwarden Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie Defendant: ET Questions referred Can Article 12(1) of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA 1 be interpreted as meaning that, when a confiscation order transferred by an issuing State is executed in the Netherlands, a term of imprisonment pending payment as referred to in Article 577c of the Netherlands Code of Criminal Procedure may be applied, having regard to, inter alia, the decision of the Hoge Raad of 20 December 2011 2 to the effect that a term of imprisonment pending payment must be deemed to be a penalty within the meaning of Article 7(1) of the ECHR? Does it make any difference to the possibility of applying a term of imprisonment pending payment whether the law of the issuing State also makes provision for the possibility of applying a term of imprisonment pending payment? ____________ 1 Council Framework Decision of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders (OJ 2006 L 328, p. 59). 2 NL:HR:2011:BP9449.