Opinion of the Advocate General — ECLI:EU:C:2019:191
Date: 2019-03-12
Language of the case: Spanish
Subject matter: Social Policy
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Spain

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Pamplona (Spain) lodged on 5 February 2018 — Daniel Ustariz Aróstegui v Consejería de Educación del Gobierno de Navarra (Case C-72/18) Language of the case: Spanish Referring court Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Pamplona Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Daniel Ustariz Aróstegui Defendant: Consejería de Educación del Gobierno de Navarra Question referred 1.- Must Clause 4 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP approved by Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 1 be interpreted as precluding a regional legislative provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which expressly excludes the award and payment to staff employed by the Public Administration of Navarre who are classified as ‘employed under an administrative contract’ (a fixed-term contract) of particular additional remuneration, on the grounds that the additional remuneration in question constitutes remuneration for promotion and development in a professional career that is open only to staff classified as ‘established public officials’ (with a contract of indefinite duration)? ____________ 1 Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43).