Order — ECLI:EU:C:2018:655
Date: 2018-08-07
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions
Procedure: Appeal - unfounded;Action for damages
Origin: Luxembourg

summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Application for compensation for damage allegedly caused by an EU institution — Factors enabling identification of the conduct of which the institution is accused, the causal link and the reality and certainty of the damage caused (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para., and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 120(c)) (see paras 23, 24, 29-31) 3. Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Pleas in law not set out in the application — Reference to the whole of the annexes — Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para., and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 120(c)) (see paras 33, 34) 4. Judicial proceedings — Decision taken by way of reasoned order — Possibility of ruling without an oral procedure — Infringement of the right to effective judicial protection — No such infringement (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 126) (see paras 40-42) 5. Appeal — Grounds — Plea directed against a superfluous ground — Invalid plea in law — Rejection (see para. 47) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly unfounded and, in part, manifestly ineffective. 2. Mr Massimo Campailla is ordered to bear his own costs. 2. Mr Massimo Campailla is ordered to bear his own costs.