Order — ECLI:EU:T:2019:131
Date: 2019-02-28
Language of the case: French
Court formation: First Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions
Procedure: Action for annulment - inadmissible;Action for damages - inadmissible
Origin: France

Action brought on 19 June 2018 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Case T-375/18) Language of the case: French Parties Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch (Villiers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer) Defendant: European Parliament Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: declare that the decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan, notified on 20 March 2018, is unlawful; annul that decision; annul both implicit decisions rejecting the complaints submitted to the President of the European Parliament and the Secretary-General of the European Parliament on 2 May 2018; revoke the acts and measures adopted after the abovementioned acts; award the applicant the amount of EUR 1 in compensation for the non-material harm he suffered as a result of his being excluded from the parliamentary visit and the failure to have regard to the compensation to which he was entitled; also award him the amount of EUR 3 500 in compensation for the expenses incurred in preparing this action, and order the European Parliament to pay all costs. Pleas in law and main arguments In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law. 1. First plea in law: infringement of the implementing provisions governing the work of delegations and missions of Members of the European Parliament outside the European Union. 2. Second plea in law: breach of the right to an effective remedy and to good administration. ____________