Opinion of the Advocate General — ECLI:EU:C:2012:797
Date: 2012-12-13
Language of the case: Finnish
Subject matter: Environment;Approximation of laws;Research and technological development;Public health;Waste;REACH
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Finland

summary in ECR [2008] I‑198. 33 – Case C‑444/00 Mayer Parry Recycling [2003] ECR I‑6163, paragraph 75. 34 – Case C‑457/02 Niselli [2004] ECR I‑10853, paragraph 52. 35 – Case C‑317/07 Lahti Energia [2008] ECR I‑9051, paragraph 35, and Case C‑209/09 Lahti Energia II [2010] ECR I‑1429, paragraph 20. 36 – See Palin Granitand Vehmassalon kansanterveystyön kuntayhtymän hallitus, cited in footnote 29, paragraph 38. 37 – ARCOChemie Nederland and Others, cited in footnote 29, paragraphs 87 and 96. 38 – Palin Granitand Vehmassalon kansanterveystyön kuntayhtymän hallitus, cited in footnote 29, paragraph 43; Commission v Italy, cited in footnote 32, paragraphs 61 and 62; and Lahti Energia II, cited in footnote 35, paragraph 23 et seq. 39 – SPCM and Others, cited in footnote 14. 40 – See above, point 56 et seq.