Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2007:199
Date: 2007-07-05
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Appeals Chamber
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Subject matter: Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Concepts: Equal treatment and non-discrimination;Discretion of the reporting officer
Procedure: Appeal - unfounded;Staff cases

Summary Officials – Reports procedure – Career development report (Staff Regulations, Art. 43) There is a breach of the principle of equal treatment where two classes of persons whose factual and legal situations are not essentially different are treated differently or where different situations are treated in an identical manner. The fact that, because of the rule establishing a weighting of points awarded under the various headings of the career development report, two officials with exactly the same number of points under one heading of that report receive different total numbers of points when the points awarded under other headings are added, is not to be treated as an infringement of the principle of equal treatment, since that difference reflects the fact that those officials are not in the same situation in relation to those other headings. The same finding is true in a case where two officials who have obtained different numbers of points under one of those headings receive an identical total number of points when the points awarded under the other headings are added. (see paras 36-37) See: T‑18/89 and T‑24/89 Tagaras v Court of Justice [1991] ECR II‑53, para. 68; T‑219/02 and T‑337/02 Lutz Herrera v Commission [2004] ECR-SC I‑A‑319 and II‑1407, para. 93; T‑43/04 Fardoom and Reinard v Commission [2005] ECR-SC I‑A‑329 and II‑1465, para. 42; T‑47/04 Milbert and Others v Commission [2006] ECR-SC I-A-2-281 and II-A-2-1455 para. 53