Order — ECLI:EU:C:2018:686
Date: 2018-09-06
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Eighth Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - unfounded;Appeal - inadmissible
Origin: Germany

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Hansen v bet365 Group (Case C‑136/18 P) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark BET 365 — Evidence of the acquisition of distinctive character through use) 1. Appeal — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256(1), first para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 169(2)) (see para. 6) 2. Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 6) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed in its entirety as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. 2. Mr Robert Hansen shall bear his own costs. 2. Mr Robert Hansen shall bear his own costs.