Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2019:31
Date: 2019-01-24
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Fifth Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded

Action brought on 11 December 2017 — Brown Street Holdings v EUIPO — Enesan (FIGHT LIFE) (Case T-800/17) Language in which the application was lodged: German Parties Applicant: Brown Street Holdings Ltd (Auckland, New Zealand) (represented by: C. Hufnagel, M. Kleespies, A. Bender and J. Clayton-Chen, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Enesan AG (Zurich, Switzerland) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal Trade mark at issue: International registration No 1 112 642 designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘FIGHT LIFE’ Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2017 in Case R 36/2017-2 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the contested decision; order EUIPO to pay the costs. Pleas in law Infringement of the second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; Infringement of the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. ____________