Judgment;Summary — ECLI:EU:C:2022:238
Date: 2022-03-31
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Eighth Chamber
Subject matter: Consumer protection;Approximation of laws
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Germany

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 – DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA (Case C-96/21) Language of the case: German Referring court Amtsgericht Bremen Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: DM Defendant: CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA Question referred Is Article 16(l) of Directive 2011/83/EU 1 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 (‘the Consumer Rights Directive’) to be interpreted as meaning that it is sufficient for the exclusion of the consumer’s right of withdrawal if the trader does not directly provide the consumer with a service related to leisure activities but sells the consumer a right of access to such a service? ____________ 1 Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).