Judgment — ECLI:EU:C:2007:133
Date: 2007-03-06
Language of the case: Italian
Court formation: Grand Chamber
Based on: Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (1957)
Subject matter: Right of establishment;Freedom to provide services
Concepts: The various activities;The various services
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Italy

Summary of the Judgment 1. Freedom of movement for persons – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions (Arts 43 EC and 49 EC) 2. Freedom of movement for persons – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions (Arts 43 EC and 49 EC) 3. Freedom of movement for persons – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions (Arts 43 EC and 49 EC) 1. National legislation which prohibits the pursuit of the activities of collecting, taking, booking and forwarding offers of bets, in particular bets on sporting events, without a licence or a police authorisation issued by the Member State concerned, constitutes a restriction on the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, provided for in Articles 43 EC and 49 EC respectively. The objective of combating criminality by making the operators active in the sector subject to control and channelling the activities of betting and gaming into the systems thus controlled is capable of justifying those obstacles, a licensing system being capable, in that regard, of constituting an efficient mechanism. However, it is for the national courts to determine whether, in limiting the number of operators active in the betting and gaming sector, that national legislation genuinely contributes to that objective. By the same token, it will be for the national courts to ascertain whether those restrictions are suitable for achieving the objective pursued, do not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives, and are applied without discrimination. (see paras 49, 52, 57-58, operative part 1-2) 2. Articles 43 EC and 49 EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which excludes from the betting and gaming sector operators in the form of companies whose shares are quoted on the regulated markets. Independently of the question whether the exclusion of companies quoted on the regulated markets applies, in fact, in the same way to operators established in the Member State concerned and to those from other Member States, that blanket exclusion goes beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objective of preventing operators active in the betting and gaming sector from being involved in criminal or fraudulent activities. (see paras 62, 64, operative part 3) 3. Articles 43 EC and 49 EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which imposes a criminal penalty on persons for pursuing the organised activity of collecting bets without a licence or a police authorisation as required under the national legislation, where those persons were unable to obtain licences or authorisations because that Member State, in breach of Community law, refused to grant licences or authorisations to them. Although in principle criminal legislation is a matter for which the Member States are responsible, Community law sets certain limits to their power, and such legislation may not restrict the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by Community law. Furthermore, a Member State may not apply a criminal penalty for failure to complete an administrative formality where such completion has been refused or rendered impossible by the Member State concerned in breach of Community law. (see paras 68-69, 71, operative part 4)