Judgment;Summary — ECLI:EU:C:2025:561
Date: 2025-07-10
Language of the case: Romanian
Court formation: Eighth Chamber
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Romania

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 23 May 2024 – Autoritatea Națională pentru Administrare și Reglementare în Comunicații v Telekom România Mobile Communications (Case C-367/24, Telekom România Mobile Communications) Language of the case: Romanian Referring court Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție Parties to the main proceedings Appellant on a point of law and defendant at first instance: Autoritatea Națională pentru Administrare și Reglementare în Comunicații Respondent on a point of law and applicant at first instance: Telekom România Mobile Communications Question referred Must Article 3 of Regulation [2015/2120] 1 be interpreted as meaning that a tariff option offered by a telecommunications undertaking which allows final customers who have accepted it to use all video-streaming services free of charge, independently of the service provider and regardless of whether or not they have the status of content partner of the telecommunications undertaking, is compatible with the obligations arising from that provision, without the data volume consumed by using those services being included in the monthly data allowance guaranteed by the mobile communications tariff, but with a limitation of the bandwidth for that type of content? ____________ 1 Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union (OJ 2015 L 310, p. 1).