Order — ECLI:EU:T:2026:131
Date: 2026-02-11
Language of the case: Polish
Court formation: Second Chamber
Procedure: Action for annulment
Origin: Poland

Order of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO – Oraczewska (100) (Case T-212/25) 1 (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 100 – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 102(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Relevant territory – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) Language of the case: Polish Parties Applicant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. (Częstochowa, Poland) (represented by: A. Dobosz, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Beata Oraczewska (Rzeszów, Poland) (represented by: E. Pijewska and M. Mazurek, lawyers) Re: By its action brought under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 January 2025 (Case R 1050/2024-1). Operative part of the order The action is dismissed. Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. shall bear its own costs and pay those of Beata Oraczewska. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs. ____________ 1 OJ C, C/2025/2698, 19.5.2025.