Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2013:240
Date: 2013-05-14
Language of the case: Italian
Court formation: Second Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Italy

Action brought on 21 June 2011 - Morelli v OHIM - Associazione Nazionale Circolo del Popolo della Libertà (PARTITO DELLA LIBERTÀ) (Case T -321/11) Language in which the application was lodged: Italian Parties Applicant: Raffaello Morelli (Livorno, Italy) (represented by: G. Frenelli, lawyer) Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Associazione Nazionale Circolo del Popolo della Libertà (Milan, Italy) Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the First Board of Appeal's decision of 17 March 2011 and that of the Opposition Division of 14 May 2010; declare that the applicant's opposition to the application for registration of a trade mark No 5.890.009 is upheld and refuse the application for that mark; order the Associazione Nazionale Circolo del Popolo della Libertà to pay the costs. Pleas in law and main arguments Applicant for a Community trade mark: Associazione Nazionale Circolo del Popolo della Libertà Community trade mark concerned: Word mark 'PARTITO DELLA LIBERTÀ' (application for registration No 5.890.009), for goods and services in classes 9, 14, 16, 24, 25, 35, 36, 38, 41, 42 and 45. Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Raffaello Morelli Mark or sign cited in opposition: Domain name 'partitodellaliberta.it', assigned by the Autorità proposta all'assegnazione dei domini 'it' to Raffaello Morelli on 9 August 2004, which the opponents claimed was used in the course of trade for goods and services in classes 16, 35, 38, 41 and 45 Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed Pleas in law: Misapplication of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark, incorrect appraisal of 'use in the course of trade' with reference to a name used in the sphere of politics and incorrect appraisal of the documents proving business use of the earlier sign. ____________