Order — ECLI:EU:T:2014:746
Date: 2014-09-04
Language of the case: German
Court formation: President of the Chamber
Subject matter: State aids;Competition
Procedure: Action for annulment;Application for interim measures - unfounded
Origin: Germany

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Fricopan Back v Commission (Case T-300/14) 1 (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate — Action for annulment — Application to amend the form of order sought — No new information — Inadmissibility) Language of the case: German Parties Applicant: Fricopan Back GmbH Immekath (Klötze, Germany) (represented by: T. Volz, M. Ringel, B. Wißmann, M. Püstow, C. Oehme and T. Wielsch lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers) Re: Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)). Operative part of the order 1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. 2. The application seeking that the form of order sought in the present action be amended to cover Commission decision C (2014) 8786 final of 25 November 2014 relating to State Aid SA. 33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users is rejected as inadmissible. 3. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority. 4. Fricopan Back GmbH Immekath shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. 5. The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs. ____________ 1 OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.