Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2016:136
Date: 2016-03-10
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded

Action brought on 28 January 2015 – credentis v OHIM – Aldi Karlslunde (Curodont) (Case T-53/15) Language in which the application was lodged: English Parties Applicant: credentis AG (Windisch, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Breuer, lawyer) Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aldi Karlslunde K/S (Karlslunde, Denmark) Details of the proceedings before OHIM Applicant: Applicant Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Curodont’– Application for registration No 10 332 807 Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 November 2014 in Case R 353/2014-1 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: Annul the contested decision; Order OHIM and Aldi Karlslunde to pay the costs. Plea in law Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.