Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2017:689
Date: 2017-10-04
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded;Action for annulment - successful
Origin: Poland

Action brought on 28 July 2015 — Gappol Marzena Porczyńska v OHIM — GAP (ITM) (GAPPoL) (Case T-411/15) Language in which the application was lodged: Polish Parties Applicant: PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: J. Gwiazdowska, lawye t for the Community trade mark: The applicantTrade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘GAPPoL’ — Application No 8 346 165Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedingsContes ted decision: Decision of the First Boa rd of Appeal of OHIM of 13 May 2015 in Case R 686/2013 -1Form of order soughtThe applicant claims that the Court should:set aside the contested decision;give a fi nal decision by amending the decision of the B oard of Appeal by rejecting the opposition also in regard to the goods in Classes 20 and 25;order OHI M to pay the costs of the proceedings.Pleas in lawInfringement of Articles 59 and 64(1) of Counci l Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) (‘Regulation No 207/2009);Infringement of Articl e 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Rule 50(2) (h) of Commis sion Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1) (‘Regulation No 2868/95’) ;Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Rule 50(2)(g) of Regulation No 2868/95;Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;Infringement of Articles 8(5) and 9(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. ____________