Judgment — ECLI:EU:C:2018:22
Date: 2018-01-18
Language of the case: Dutch
Court formation: Ninth Chamber
Subject matter: Taxation;Value added tax
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Netherlands

Summary — Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber), 18 January 2018 Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax — Discretionary power of the Member States to apply a reduced rate to certain supplies of goods and services — Single supply comprised of two distinct elements, one principal, the other ancillary — Elements capable of being subject to different rates if supplied separately — Obligation to apply a single rate determined according to the principal element — Possibility of identifying the price corresponding to each distinct element — Irrelevant (Council Directive 77/388, as amended by Directive 2001/4, Art. 12(3)(a)) The Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 2001/4/EC of 19 January 2001, must be interpreted as meaning that a single supply, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, comprised of two distinct elements, one principal, the other ancillary, which, if they were supplied separately, would be subject to different rates of value added tax, must be taxed solely at the rate of value added tax applicable to that single supply, that rate being determined according to the principal element, even if the price of each element forming the full price paid by a consumer in order to be able to receive that supply can be identified. (see para. 36, operative part)