Judgment;Summary — ECLI:EU:C:2019:414
Date: 2019-05-15
Language of the case: Czech
Court formation: Eighth Chamber
Subject matter: Free movement of goods;Common customs tariff;Customs Union
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling;Reference for a preliminary ruling - decision unnecessary
Origin: Czechia

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě — pobočka v Olomouci (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 May 2018 — KORADO, a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel (Case C-306/18) Language of the case: Czech Referring court Krajský soud v Ostravě — pobočka v Olomouci Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: KORADO, a.s. Defendant: Generální ředitelství cel Questions referred Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/23 1 of 5 January 2015, in which the goods described in column 1 of the table in the annex are classified under sub-heading 7 307 93 19 of the Combined Nomenclature, valid? If that Regulation is invalid, could the articles concerned be classified under sub-heading 7 322 19 00 of the Combined Nomenclature? If that Regulation is valid, must the articles concerned be classified under sub-heading 7 307 93 19 of the Combined Nomenclature? ____________ 1 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/23 of 5 January 2015 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature, OJ 2015 L 4, p. 15.