Order — ECLI:EU:C:2013:155
Date: 2013-03-07
Language of the case: Hungarian
Court formation: Eighth Chamber
Subject matter: Taxation
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - unfounded;Appeal - inadmissible;Action for damages
Origin: Hungary

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 March 2013 — Szarvas v Hungary (Case C‑389/12 P) Appeal — Article 181 Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice —Action brought by a natural or legal person against a Member State — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible — Appeal manifestly unfounded 1. Appeals — Grounds — Failure to identify the contested elements of the order under appeal of the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169) (see paras 11, 12) 2. Judicial proceedings — Action brought by a natural or legal person seeking that a Member State be ordered to comply with European Union law — Lack of jurisdiction of the Courts of the European Union — Manifest inadmissibility (see para. 13) Re : Appeal against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2012 in Case T‑129/12 Szarvas v Hungary by which the General Court dismissed the action seeking the annulment of the Hungarian legislation applicable to the acquisition of immovable property and the decisions listed in the judgment of the Fejér Megyei Bíroság (Regional Court of Fejér), of 23 November 2011, delivered in the context of a dispute concerning the payment of taxes on the conclusion of a contract for the purchase of immovable property, and an action for damages seeking compensation for the non‑material harm allegedly suffered. Operative part: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Mr Szarvas is ordered to pay his own costs.