Order — ECLI:EU:T:2015:744
Date: 2015-09-25
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Appeals Chamber
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Subject matter: Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Procedure: Appeal - unfounded;Appeal - inadmissible;Staff cases
Origin: Belgium

Summary 1. Judicial proceedings — Obligation for the Civil Service Tribunal to commence the oral procedure before ruling on a plea of inadmissibility — None (Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal, Art. 78(2)) 2. Appeal — Grounds of appeal — Incorrect assessment of the facts — Inadmissibility — General Court’s review of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 257 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Annex I, Art. 11(1)) 3. Appeal — Grounds of appeal — Mere repetition of the pleas in law and arguments presented before the Civil Service Tribunal — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 257 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Annex I, Art. 11(1); Rules of Procedure of the General Court (1991), Art. 138(1), first subpara., (c)) 1. See the text of the decision. (see para. 30) See: Orders of 21 November 2005 in SNF v Commission, C‑482/04 P, EU:C:2005:706, para. 30; 8 December 2006 in Polyelectrolyte Producers Group v Commission and Council, C‑368/05 P, EU:C:2006:771, para. 46, and 12 July 2012 in Government of Gibraltar v Commission, C‑407/11 P, EU:C:2012:464, para. 45 2. See the text of the decision. (see paras 37-39) See: Order of 12 July 2007 in Beau v Commission, T‑252/06 P, ECR-SC, EU:T:2007:230, paras 45 and 46, and judgment of 18 June 2013 in Heath v ECB, T‑645/11 P, ECR-SC, EU:T:2013:326, para. 101 and the case-law cited therein 3. See the text of the decision. (see paras 41, 47, 55) See: Judgments of 19 September 2008 in Chassagne v Commission, T‑253/06 P, ECR-SC, EU:T:2008:386, para. 54; 8 September 2009 in ETF v Landgren, T‑404/06 P, ECR, EU:T:2009:313, para. 140, and 16 December 2010 in Lebedef v Commission, T‑52/10 P, ECR-SC, EU:T:2010:543, para. 35 and the case-law cited therein