Information;Order — ECLI:EU:T:2023:356
Date: 2023-06-20
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Fifth Chamber
Subject matter: State aids;Competition
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded;Action for annulment - inadmissible

Summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Similar requirements for submissions made in support of a plea – Complaint not sufficiently clear and precise – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para., and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paragraphs 22-26, 44, 46) 2. Aid granted by a Member State – Examination of complaints – Obligations of the Commission – Information concerning an allegedly unlawful aid measure – Information not enabling the measure at issue to be categorised as State aid – Obligation for the Commission to inform the complainant of its intention to reject the complaint – None (Art. 107(1) TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589) (see paragraphs 30-34, 45) 3. Action for annulment – Pleas in law– Plea directed against a ground included for the sake of completeness – Plea in law ineffective (see paragraphs 39-41) 4. Aid granted by a Member State – Commission decision finding that there is no State aid – Obligation to state reasons – Scope (Art. 296 TFEU) (see paragraphs 50-54) Operative part 1. The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. 2. NO is ordered to pay the costs. 1 OJ C 104, 20.3.2023.