Order — ECLI:EU:T:2017:94
Date: 2017-02-16
Language of the case: French
Court formation: President of the Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions
Procedure: Action for annulment;Application for interim measures - unfounded;Action for damages
Origin: France

summary of the pleas in law on which the application based — Action seeking compensation for loss caused by an EU institution — No indications as to the character and extent of the damage suffered or as to the causal link — Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21 and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paras 75-77) Re: APPLICATION based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 1 July 2016 ordering recovery from the applicant of the sum of EUR 275 984.23 unduly paid by way of parliamentary assistance and of the related debit note of 5 July 2016. Operative part 1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible in so far as it concerns: (1) the application for annulment of the notification and measures for implementation of the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 1 July 2016, concerning the recovery from Mr Bruno Gollnisch of a sum of EUR 275 984.23, contained in the letter from the Director General of the Directorate General for Finance of the Parliament of 6 July 2016; (2) the claim for the award of the sum of EUR 40 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage; (3) the claim for the award of the sum of EU 24 500 in respect of costs incurred; and (4) the claim for suspension of operation of the decision referred to above. 2. The objection of inadmissibility is dismissed as to the remainder. 3. The claim, submitted by Mr Gollnisch in the observations on the objection of inadmissibility, seeking payment by the Parliament of a sum of EUR 3 500 in respect of his lawyers’ fees and the costs of that objection is inadmissible. 4. The documents annexed to the observations of Mr Gollnisch on the objection of inadmissibility are withdrawn from the case file. 5. Costs are reserved.