Order — ECLI:EU:C:2017:368
Date: 2017-05-11
Language of the case: Romanian
Court formation: First Chamber
Subject matter: Taxation;Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties;Value added tax
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling - inadmissible
Origin: Romania

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 23 May 2016 — SC Exmitiani SRL v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Cluj (Case C-286/16) Language of the case: Romanian Referring court Curtea de Apel Cluj Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: SC Exmitiani SRL Defendant: Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Cluj Questions referred In a situation such as that in the main proceedings, in which the disputed administrative measure was adopted before the accession [of the Republic of Romania to the European Union] and the appeal against that measure was decided on by provision of the tax authorities after the accession, does the principle of cooperation in good faith imply that national legislation is to be interpreted in the light of the EU directives applicable to VAT? 1 Having regard to the circumstances of the main proceedings, is the principle of legal certainty to be interpreted as precluding the practice of tax authorities whereby, on the basis of the same factual circumstances, those authorities reach different conclusions from those reached by the prosecution authorities as regards the exemption from VAT of the provision of services directly connected with international passenger transport? Is the principle of cooperation in good faith to be interpreted as precluding domestic legislation which provides that, where pleas based on provisions of EU law are not raised in an appeal against an administrative measure, such pleas may not be raised subsequently before the courts? ____________ 1 Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).