Opinion of the Advocate General — ECLI:EU:C:2014:318
Date: 2014-05-08
Language of the case: German
Subject matter: Agriculture and Fisheries;Consumer protection
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Germany

summary. It may also be noted that Article 2.7 of the TBT Agreement (cited in footnote 18) requires Members to ‘give positive consideration to accepting as equivalent technical regulations of other Members, even if these regulations differ from their own, provided they are satisfied that these regulations adequately fulfil the objectives of their own regulations’. 22 – See, for a recent example, Nordecon and Ramboll Eesti (C‑561/12, EU:C:2013:793), paragraph 29. 23 – See, for a recent example, Križan and Others (C‑416/10, EU:C:2013:8), paragraph 66. 24 – See, for a recent example of the consistent case-law, the order in Società cooperativa Madonna dei miracoli (C‑82/13, EU:C:2013:655), paragraphs 11 and 12 and case-law cited.