Information;Order — ECLI:EU:C:2022:765
Date: 2022-10-05
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Subject matter: Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Procedure: Appeal - inadmissible;Staff cases

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022 – FJ and Others v EEAS (Case C‑170/22 P) (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible) 1. Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissibility (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paragraphs 4 [4, 5, 7], 5) 2. Judicial proceedings – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Brief statement of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Abstract statement – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 169) (see paragraphs 4[6], 5) 3. Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the facts or evidence have been distorted (Art. 256(1), second subpara., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d)) (see paragraphs 4[8], 5) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. 2. FJ and Others shall bear their own costs.