Judgment — ECLI:EU:C:2015:329
Date: 2015-05-21
Language of the case: Finnish
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Right of establishment;Approximation of laws;Freedom to provide services
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Finland

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 30 May 2014 — Kansaneläkelaitos, Suomen Palvelutaksit ry, Oulun Taksipalvelut Oy (Case C-269/14) Language of the case: Finnish Referring court Korkein hallinto-oikeus Parties to the main proceedings Appellants: Kansaneläkelaitos, Suomen Palvelutaksit ry, Oulun Taksipalvelut Oy Other parties: Suomen Taksiliitto ry, Turun Seudun Invataksit ry, Hämeen Taksi Oy, Itä-Suomen Maakunnallinen Taksi Oy, Kainuun Taksivälitys Oy, Keski-Suomen Taksi Oy, Lounais-Suomen Taxidata Oy, Pohjois-Suomen Taksi Oy Questions referred Must the case-law of the Court of Justice concerning a service concession be understood as meaning that it does not extend to a complex arrangement which includes the payment of reimbursements within the authority’s organisational responsibility in the form of a direct reimbursement scheme and at the same time a system of booking journeys which is not within the authority’s responsibility? What significance should be attached to the indirect consequence of the scheme that the purpose of the booking system is to reduce the transport costs payable from public funds by the Kansaneläkelaitos?