Information;Order — ECLI:EU:C:2020:407
Date: 2020-05-28
Language of the case: English
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - inadmissible
Origin: Sweden

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 May 2020– Hästens Sängar v EUIPO (Case C‑74/20 P) (Appeal – EU trade mark – Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed) 1. Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of Union – Burden of proof (Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b) (see para. 15) 2. Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Formal requirements – Scope (Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a and 170b) (see paras 16-18, 20) 3. Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of Union law – Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to show the significance of the issue – Appeal not allowed to proceed (Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170a and 170b) (see paras 21, 22, 25-28, 30, 31) 4. Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of Union law – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Not included (Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170a and 170b) (see paras 23, 24) 5. Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of Union law –Question that has not been examined by the Court – Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to show the significance of the issue – Appeal not allowed to proceed (Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170a and 170b) (see para. 29) Operative part 1. The appeal is not allowed to proceed. 2. Hästens Sängar AB shall bear its own costs.