Order — ECLI:EU:C:2015:113
Date: 2015-02-12
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Ninth Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - unfounded;Appeal - inadmissible

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — Argo Group International Holdings v OHIM (Case C‑370/14 P) Appeals — Community trade mark — Figurative mark in colour including the word element ‘ARIS’ — Opposition by the proprietor of the Community figurative mark in red and blue including the word elements ‘ARISA ASSURANCES S.A.’ — Refusal of registration 1. Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256, TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 24, 39) 2. Appeals — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility (see para. 28) 3. Appeals — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paras 32, 33) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Argo Group International Holdings Ltd is ordered to bear its own costs.