Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2016:629
Date: 2016-10-26
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: External relations;Common foreign and security policy
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded

summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — General reference to documents annexed to the application — Admissibility — Conditions (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(1)(d)) (see paras 52, 77) 3. Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies having regard to the situation in Syria — Decision falling within a context known to the person concerned, enabling him to understand the scope of the measure taken against him — Whether summary statement of reasons sufficient (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decisions 2013/255/CFSP and 2015/117/CFSP; Council Regulations No 36/2012 and No 2015/108) (see paras 57-63, 67, 68) 4. Actions for annulment — Grounds — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Obligation to state reasons — Separate ground from the one concerning substantive legality (Arts 263 TFEU and 296 TFEU) (see para. 70) 5. European Union — Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions — Restrictive measures against Syria — Ambit of the review — Proof the measure well-founded — Obligation on the competent EU authority to establish, in the event of challenge, that the grounds held against the persons or entities concerned well-founded (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Council Decisions 2013/255/CFSP and 2015/117/CFSP; Council Regulations No 36/2012 and No 2015/108) (see paras 74, 75, 103, 108) 6. Judicial proceedings — Burden of proof — Documentary evidence — Probative value — Assessment by the EU judicature — Criteria (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 85) (see paras 86, 88) 7. Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Annulment action by a person benefiting from the policies of the Syrian regime covered by a fund-freezing decision — Burden of proof — Decision based on a series of indicators — Lawfulness — Conditions (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decisions 2013/255/CFSP and 2015/117/CFSP; Council Regulations No 36/2012 and No 2015/108) (see paras 97, 98) 8. EU law — Principles — Rights of defence — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of the funds of persons, entities or bodies responsible for violent repression against the civil population in Syria — Obligation to communicate the incriminating evidence at the same time as the adoption of the measure affecting those parties, or immediately thereafter (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 41(2); Council Decisions 2013/255/CFSP and 2015/117/CFSP; Council Regulations No 36/2012 and No 2015/108) (see paras 113-116) 9. Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of the funds of persons, entities or organisations associated with the Syrian regime — Restrictions on the right to property — No breach of principle of proportionality (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 17; Council Decisions 2013/255/CFSP and 2015/117/CFSP; Council Regulations No 36/2012 and No 2015/108) (see paras 118, 119) Re: ACTION brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2015/117/CFSP of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 85), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 of 26 January 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2015, L 20, p. 2), in so far as the name of the applicant is included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures. Operative part The Court: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Orders Mr Aiman Jaber to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union in the context of the present proceedings and during the proceedings for an interim order.