Order — ECLI:EU:C:2019:223
Date: 2019-03-19
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - inadmissible

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 March 2019 — Sevenfriday v EUIPO (Case C‑734/18 P) (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the word mark SEVENFRIDAY — Opposition proceedings — Rejection of the application for registration — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Appeal manifestly inadmissible) 1. Appeal — Grounds — Lack of specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning and of legal arguments in support of the appeal — Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see para. 5) 2. Appeal — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Inadmissibility — Challenge to the interpretation or application of EU law made by the General Court — Admissibility (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d)) (see para. 5) 3. Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170(1)) (see para. 5) 4. Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 5) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. 2. Sevenfriday AG is ordered to bear its own costs.