Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2018:313
Date: 2018-05-30
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Eighth Chamber
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Subject matter: Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Procedure: Staff cases - successful

Action brought on 10 February 2017 – RT v Parliament (Case T-98/17) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: RT (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer) Defendant: European Parliament Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: declare the application admissible; annul the decision of the appointing authority of 30 June 2016 rejecting a medical certificate; together with, and so far as necessary annul the decision of the appointing authority of 13 January 2017, rejecting the applicant’s complaint; and order the defendant to pay the costs. Pleas in law and main arguments In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law. First plea in law, alleging breach of Article 59 of Staff Regulations and Article 2 of the Internal Rules. Second plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment and breach of Article 59 of the Staff Regulations and Article 2 of the Internal Rules. Third plea in law, alleging breach of Article 59 of the Staff Regulations and Article 2 of the Internal Rules, failure to state adequate reasons, and violation of the principle of legal certainty. ____________