Order — ECLI:EU:T:2011:766
Date: 2011-12-16
Language of the case: Dutch
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: State aids;Competition
Procedure: Action for annulment - inadmissible;Application to intervene - decision unnecessary
Origin: Netherlands

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2011 - Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission (Case T-203/10)  (State aid - Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations - Existing aid - Decision accepting Member State's commitments - Decision declaring new aid compatible - Action for annulment - Not individually concerned No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility) Language of the case: Dutch Parties Applicants: Stichting Woonpunt (Beek, Netherlands); Stichting Com.wonen (Rotterdam, Netherlands); Woningstichting Haag Wonen (The Hague, Netherlands); and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented by : P. Glazener, E. Henny and T. Ottervanger, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, S. Noë and S. Thomas, Agents, and by H. Gilliams, lawyer) Re: Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 (Netherlands) - Existing and special project aid to housing corporations. Operative part of the order The action is dismissed as inadmissible; There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of Vesteda Groep BV and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed; Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Com.wonen, Woningstichting Haag Wonen and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission; Vesteda Groep and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, applicants for leave to intervene, are ordered to bear their own costs. ____________ 1 - OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.