Information;Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2025:853
Date: 2025-09-10
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Third Chamber
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Germany

Action brought on 10 June 2024 – KHG v EUIPO – Panther Deutschland (Baltic Breeze) (Case T-299/24) Language in which the application was lodged: German Parties Applicant: KHG GmbH & Co. KG (Schönefeld, Germany) (represented by: D. Gehnen and K. Ritzman, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Panther Deutschland GmbH (Berlin, Germany) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Baltic Breeze – Application No 18 404 835 Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2024 in Case R 1462/2023-5 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the contested decision; order EUIPO and, if it intervenes in the proceedings, the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs. Plea in law Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. ____________