Information;Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2024:654
Date: 2024-09-25
Language of the case: French
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Subject matter: Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Procedure: Staff cases - unfounded

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 September 2024 – PT v Commission (Case T‑367/22) (1) ( Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Determination of pension rights – ‘Minimum subsistence figure’ rule – No reimbursement of transferred national pension rights – Plea of illegality – Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations – Equal treatment ) 1. Officials – Pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Grant of a pension calculated by reference to the minimum subsistence figure – Difference in treatment between officials receiving the minimum subsistence figure who made a transfer and those who did not make a transfer – Non-comparable situations (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 20; Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 77, fourth para.) (see paragraphs 35, 36, 38, 48) 2. Officials – Pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Additional years of pensionable service – Accrued years of pensionable service resulting in an amount lower than the minimum subsistence figure – Consequences – Calculation of the pension by reference to the minimum subsistence figure – No mechanism that involves not taking into account the transfer made by the person concerned – Refusal to reimburse the amount of that transfer – Whether permissible (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 77 and Annex VIII, Arts 2, 6 and 11(2)) (see paragraphs 40-42, 44-47, 60, 61) 3. Actions brought by officials – Pleas in law – Plea alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment – Reliance on measures adopted by another institution in respect of their staff – Rejection (see paragraph 57) 4. Actions brought by officials – Pleas in law – Plea alleging infringement of the principle of sound administration – Argument involving the interpretation of a provision in a way that corresponds neither to its wording nor its scope – Rejection (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 41) (see paragraph 64) Operative part The Court: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Orders PT to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; 3. Declares that the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union are to bear their own costs. 1 OJ C 303, 8.8.2022.