Judgment — ECLI:EU:C:2005:594
Date: 2005-10-06
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Second Chamber
Based on: Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (1957)
Subject matter: Intellectual, industrial and commercial property;Approximation of laws
Concepts: Effects of a mark
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Germany

Summary of the Judgment Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive 89/104 — Right of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to contest its unlawful use — Sign used for identical or similar goods — Likelihood of confusion –– Criteria for assessment –– Juxtaposing the company name of another party and a registered mark (Council Directive 89/104, Art. 5(1)(b)) Article 5(1)(b) of First Directive 89/104 relating to trade marks is to be interpreted as meaning that where the goods or services are identical there may be a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public where the contested sign is composed by juxtaposing the company name of another party and a registered mark which has normal distinctiveness and which, without alone determining the overall impression conveyed by the composite sign, still has an independent distinctive role therein. (see para. 37, operative part)