Information;Order — ECLI:EU:T:2020:111
Date: 2020-03-13
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions
Procedure: Action for annulment - inadmissible
Origin: France

summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Absence — Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para. and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paras 15, 16, 18, 19) 3. Action for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Regulatory acts — Acts not comprising implementing measures and concerning the applicant directly — Conditions cumulative in nature — Inadmissibility of the action where just one of those conditions not met (Art. 263, fourth para. TFEU) (see paras 22, 25, 27-30) 4. Action for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of individual concern to them — Criteria (Art. 263, fourth para. TFEU) (see paras 31-35) 5. Action for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Regulatory acts entailing implementing measures — Concept — Criteria for assessment (Art. 263, fourth para. TFEU) (see paras 36, 38-41) Re: Action brought under Article 263 TFUE seeking annulment of Parliament Decision P8_TA(2019)0046 of 31 January 2019 on amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure affecting Chapters 1 and 4 of Title I; Chapter 3 of Title V; Chapters 4 and 5 of Title VII; Chapter 1 of Title VIII; Title XII; Title XIV and Annex II (2018/2170(REG)). Operative part 1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible. 2. Jean-François Jalkh shall pay the costs.