Information;Order — ECLI:EU:C:2019:1086
Date: 2019-12-12
Language of the case: Spanish
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - inadmissible
Origin: Spain

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 December 2019 — Guiral Broto v EUIPO (Case C‑715/19 P) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed) 1. Appeal — Preliminary admission scheme — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Burden of proof (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b) (see para. 8) 2. Appeal — Preliminary admission scheme — Request for an appeal to be allowed to proceed — Formal requirements — Scope (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b) (see paras 9, 10) 3. Appeal — Preliminary admission scheme — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Inadequate or contradictory grounds —Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b) (see para. 11) 4. Appeal — Preliminary admission scheme — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b) (see paras 12-14) Operative part 1. The appeal is not allowed to proceed. 2. Mr Ramón Guiral Broto is ordered to bear his own costs.