Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2019:611
Date: 2019-09-17
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Second Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Germany

Action brought on 23 October 2018 — Geske v EUIPO (revolutionary air pulse technology) (Case T-634/18) Language of the case: German Parties Applicant: André Geske (Lübbecke, Germany) (represented by: R. Albrecht, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Mark at issue: Application for EU word mark revolutionary air pulse technology — Application for registration No 17 025 231 Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2018 in Case R 2721/2017-2 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the contested decision; order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO. Pleas in law Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. ____________