Judgment;Summary — ECLI:EU:C:2019:112
Date: 2019-02-13
Language of the case: Hungarian
Court formation: Tenth Chamber
Subject matter: Taxation;Value added tax
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Hungary

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 18 July 2017 — Human Operator Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság (Case C-434/17) Language of the case: Hungarian Referring court Zalaegerszegi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Human Operator Zrt. Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság Question referred Must Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2349 1 of 10 December 2015 be interpreted as precluding the Hungarian practice of considering that the provision of national law, approval of which derives from the abovementioned Implementing Decision and which establishes a derogation from Article 193 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC, entered into force on 1 January 2015, the date from which it must be applied, when that Implementing Decision contains no provision concerning retroactivity of its effects or of its applicability and, in its request for authorisation to establish the derogation, Hungary indicated that date as the date of application? ____________ 1 Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2349 of 10 December 2015 authorising Hungary to apply a measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax; OJ 2015 L 330, p. 53.