Order — ECLI:EU:T:2026:129
Date: 2026-02-11
Language of the case: Polish
Court formation: Second Chamber
Procedure: Action for annulment
Origin: Poland

Action brought on 28 March 2025 – Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO –Oraczewska (100) (Case T-213/25) Language in which the application was lodged: Polish Parties Applicant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z. o. o. (Częstochowa, Poland) (represented by: A. Dobosz, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Beata Oraczewska (Rzeszów, Poland) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ‘100’ – EU trade mark No 3 875 408 Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 January 2025 in Case R 1052/2024-1 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the contested decision of EUIPO of 27 January 2025 in its entirety and rule that the application for a declaration of invalidity of trade mark EUTM 003875408 ‘100’ should be rejected in its entirety; order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union and – on the basis of Article 190(2) of the Rules of Procedure – the costs necessarily incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO; in the event that the intervener joins the proceedings, rule that she must cover her own costs for the purposes of those proceedings. Pleas in law Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; Infringement of Article 59(1) in conjunction with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. ____________