Judgment — ECLI:EU:C:2007:382
Date: 2007-06-26
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Grand Chamber
Based on: Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (1957)
Subject matter: Taxation;Value added tax
Concepts: Economic activity
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: United Kingdom

Summary of the Judgment Tax provisions – Harmonisation of laws – Turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax – Economic activities within the meaning of Article 4(1) and (2) of the Sixth Directive (Council Directive 77/388, Art. 4(1) and (2) Article 4(1) and (2) of the Sixth Directive 77/388 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes must be interpreted as meaning that the issuing of licences, such as third generation mobile telecommunications licences known as ‘UMTS’, by auction by the national regulatory authority responsible for spectrum assignment of the rights to use telecommunications equipment does not constitute an economic activity within the meaning of that provision and, consequently, does not fall within the scope of that directive. Such an activity constitutes a necessary precondition for the access of economic operators to the mobile telecommunications market and cannot constitute participation in that market by the competent national authority. Only those operators, who are the holders of the rights granted, operate on the relevant market by exploiting the property in question for the purpose of obtaining income therefrom on a continuing basis. Therefore, in granting such authorisations, the competent national authority is not participating in the exploitation of property, consisting in the said user rights, for the purpose of obtaining income therefrom on a continuing basis. By means of that allocation procedure, that authority exclusively carries out the activity of controlling and regulating the use of the electromagnetic spectrum which has been expressly delegated to it. Furthermore, the fact that the issuing of the licences in question gives rise to a payment cannot affect the legal status of that activity. (see paras 36, 38-39, 43, operative part)