Order — ECLI:EU:T:2018:395
Date: 2018-06-28
Language of the case: Czech
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Financial provisions;Own resources
Procedure: Action for annulment - inadmissible;Application to intervene - decision unnecessary
Origin: Czechia

Action brought on 30 March 2015 — Czech Republic v Commission (Case T-147/15) Language of the case: Czech Parties Applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller, J. Očková and J. Vláčil, acting as Agents) Defendant: European Commission Form of ord 1150/2000; order the European Commission to pay the costs.Pleas in law and main argumentsIn support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.First plea in law, alleging breach of Article 17(1) and (2) of Council Regulation No 1150/2000The applicant submits in this connection that by adopting the contested decision the Commissi on infringed Article 17(1) and (2) of Council Regulation No 1150/200 0, in that it incorrectly came to the conclusion that the Czech Republic had not taken all the necessary measures for providing an amount of EU own resources to the Commission, and in that it requires provision of an amount which could not be excluded on grounds which were not attributable to the Czech Republic.Second plea in law, alleging breach of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the rights of defence of the Czech RepublicThe applicant submits on this point that by adopting the contested decision the Commission infringe d Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the rights of defence of the Czech Republic, in that it did not enable the Czech Republic to express its point of view purposefully and effectively.