Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2018:267
Date: 2018-05-15
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Fourth Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded;Action for annulment - successful
Origin: Germany

Action brought on 22 September 2016 — Wirecard v EUIPO (mycard2go) (Case T-675/16) Language of the case: German Parties Applicant: Wirecard AG (Aschheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Bayer, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Details of the procedure before EUIPO Mark at issue: EU trade mark ‘mycard2go’ — Application No 14 303 416 Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 July 2016 in Case R 282/2016-4 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the defendant for continuation of the registration procedure concerning EU trade mark No 014303416; order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO. Plea in law Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. ____________