Order — ECLI:EU:C:2013:373
Date: 2013-06-06
Language of the case: Spanish
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Subject matter: Social Policy
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - unfounded
Origin: Spain

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2013 — Faet Oltra v Ombudsman (Case C‑535/12 P) Appeal — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court — Action for annulment manifestly inadmissible — Principles of equal treatment and proportionality — Grounds of appeal manifestly unfounded Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Application lodged without the assistance of a lawyer — Applicant with the status of lawyer authorised to practise before a national court — No effect — Manifest inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 19, third and fourth paras, and 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Arts 57(1) and 119) (see paras 9, 10, 19, 20, 26, 31) Re: Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 September 2012 in Case T‑294/12 Faet Oltra v Ombudsman , by which that court rejected the complaint lodged by the applicant following the Commission’s refusal to initiate proceedings against the Kingdom of Spain for a failure to fulfil obligations following an alleged infringement of certain provisions and principles of social law. Operative part: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Rafael Faet Oltra is ordered to pay his own costs.