Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2014:197
Date: 2014-04-09
Language of the case: Spanish
Court formation: Second Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded;Action for annulment - successful
Origin: Spain

Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Comsa v OHIM — COMSA (COMSA) (Case T-144/12) 1 (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark COMSA — Earlier company name Comsa, SA — Relative ground for refusal — Lack of use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Similarity of the services — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) Language of the case: Spanish Parties Applicant: Comsa, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented initially by M. Aznar Alonso, and subsequently by A. Gómez López, lawyers) Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Constructora de obras municipales, SA (COMSA) (Madrid, Spain) Re: Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2012 (Joined cases R 518/2011-2 and R 795/2011-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Comsa, SA and Constructora de obras municipales, SA (COMSA). Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1. Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 10 January 2012 (Joined cases R 518/2011-2 and R 795/2011-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Comsa, SA and Constructora de obras municipales, SA (COMSA), in so far as it annulled the decision of the Opposition Division with respect to the services in Class 42 and authorised registration of the mark applied for in relation to those same services; 2. Dismisses the action as to the remainder. 3. Orders Comsa to bear its own costs and to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by OHIM. Orders OHIM to bear one quarter of its costs. ____________ ____________ 1 OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.