Order — ECLI:EU:F:2009:95
Date: 2009-07-10
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Second Chamber
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Subject matter: Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Concepts: Scope of judicial review
Procedure: Staff cases - inadmissible

summary form, coherently and intelligibly in the application itself (orders of the Court of First Instance of 28 April 1993 in Case T‑85/92 De Hoe v Commission [1993] ECR II‑523, paragraph 20, and of 21 May 1999 in Case T-154/98 Asia Motor France and Others v Commission [1999] ECR II-1703, paragraph 42, and judgment in Case T‑277/97 Ismeri Europa v Court of Auditors [1999] ECR II‑1825, paragraph 29). 17 In the present case, the application manifestly fails to meet the minimum conditions of clarity and precision that would enable the defendant to prepare its defence and the Tribunal to rule on the application. The applicant merely sets out, in three paragraphs, first, the position adopted by the Tribunal in the judgment of 25 November 2008, secondly, the assertion that EPSO is refusing to comply with that judgment and, thirdly, a request that the Tribunal should order proper measures to ensure compliance with the judgment of 25 November 2008. 18 In view of all the foregoing, the application must be dismissed in its entirety as manifestly inadmissible. Costs 19 Since this order was adopted before the application was served on the other party to the proceedings and before the latter incurred any costs, it is sufficient to decide that the applicant shall bear her own costs, in accordance with Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure. On those grounds, THE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber) hereby: 1. Dismisses the application as manifestly inadmissible; 2. Orders Mrs Hristova to pay her own costs. Luxembourg, 10 July 2009. W. Hakenberg H. Kanninen Registrar President The text of the present decision and those of the decisions of the Community Courts cited in it which have not yet been published in the European Court Reports are available on the internet site of the Court of Justice: www.curia.europa.eu * Language of the case: English.