Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2017:441
Date: 2017-06-28
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded

Action brought on 30 August 2016 – Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS) (Case T-479/16) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler, A. Stolz, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘AROMASENSATIONS’ – Application for registration No 14 198 824 Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 in Case R 2482/2015-2 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the contested decision to the extent that it dismisses the appeal insofar as it is based on Article 7(1)(b); order EUIPO to pay the costs. Pleas in law Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; Infringement of principles of equal treatment and sound administration. ____________