Order — ECLI:EU:C:2018:376
Date: 2018-05-31
Language of the case: Hungarian
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Right of establishment;Free movement of capital
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling - inadmissible
Origin: Hungary

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapesti II. és III. Kerületi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 January 2018 — István Bán v KP 2000 Kft., Edit Kovács (Case C-24/18) Language of the case: Hungarian Referring court Budapesti II. és III. Kerületi Bíróság Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: István Bán Defendants: KP 2000 Kft., Edit Kovács Question referred Must national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which rights of use created over land used for agricultural or forestry activities are extinguished ex lege, without any financial compensation, where a new owner acquires, in the context of enforcement proceedings, the immovable property subject to the right of use and where the land user has not obtained, in relation to that land, aid for agricultural or rural development that is funded by the European Union or the national budget and that is subject to the obligation of using the land for a certain period of time as established by law, be regarded as a restriction contrary to Articles 49 and 63 TFEU? ____________