Judgment;Abstract — ECLI:EU:C:2020:576
Date: 2020-07-16
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Third Chamber
Subject matter: Budget;Financial provisions
Procedure: Appeal - unfounded;Arbitration clause
Origin: Italy

summary.do?id= 1492977&l=en&t=E. 139 See, in particular, recital 56 and Articles 33, 125 and 181 of Regulation 2018/1046. 140 See judgments of 2 April 1998, Commission v Sytraval and Brink’s France (C‑367/95 P, EU:C:1998:154, paragraphs 47 to 49); of 29 March 2011, ThyssenKrupp Nirosta v Commission (C‑352/09 P, EU:C:2011:191, paragraph 136); and of 7 June 2018, Ori Martin v Court of Justice of the European Union (C‑463/17 P, EU:C:2018:411, paragraph 24). 141 See above, point 159 of this Opinion. 142 With regard to the sequence of events, see above, point 16 of this Opinion. 143 See above, point 171 of this Opinion. 144 See above, point 159 of this Opinion.