Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2014:105
Date: 2014-03-06
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Germany

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2014 — Anapurna v OHIM — Annapurna (ANNAPURNA) (Case T‑71/13) Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark ANNAPURNA — Application for annulment filed by the intervener — Article 134(1) to (3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form of use of the trade mark — Proof of use for the registered goods 1. Actions for annulment — Grounds — Manifest error of assessment — Error with no decisive influence on the result — Invalid plea in law (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 134(3)) (see para. 22) 2. Community trade mark — Observations of third parties and opposition — Examination of the opposition — Proof of use of the earlier mark — Genuine use — Concept — Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 42(2) and (3)) (see paras 30, 31, 44, 45) 3. Community trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Causes of revocation — No genuine use of a trade mark — Word mark ANNAPURNA (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 51(1)(a)) (see paras 37, 38, 41, 42, 48, 49, 52-54, 64-69) 4. Community trade mark — Observations of third parties and opposition — Examination of the opposition — Proof of use of the earlier mark — Partial use — Effect — Concept of ‘part of goods or services’ concerned by registration (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 42(2) and (3)) (see paras 62-64) Re: ACTION brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 December 2012 (Case R 2409/2011-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Anapurna GmbH and Annapurna SpA. Operative part The Court: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Dismisses Annapurna SpA’s application for annulment; 3. Orders Anapurna GmbH to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by Annapurna SpA; 4. Orders Annapurna SpA to bear its own costs.