Information;Order — ECLI:EU:T:2025:327
Date: 2025-03-20
Language of the case: Italian
Court formation: Fifth Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions;Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded;Action for annulment - inadmissible
Origin: Italy

Action brought on 10 July 2023 – Di Prinzio v Parliament (Case T-375/23) Language of the case: Italian Parties Applicant: Clara Di Prinzio (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer) Defendant: European Parliament Form of order sought The applicant claims that the General Court should: declare non-existent or annul in its entirety, the measure of which the applicant was informed by the contested communication (File No D. 305484), adopted by the Head of the Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements Unit of the European Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finance – and with which the European Parliament redetermined the applicant’s retirement pension rights and ordered the recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation – and notified by registered letter received on 25 May 2023; order the European Parliament to pay the costs. Pleas in law and main arguments In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law. First plea in law, alleging a lack of competence of the author of the act adversely affecting a member of staff, infringement of essential procedural requirements by failing to state reasons and the consequent infringement of Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Second plea in law, alleging the lack of legal basis and a misapplication of Article 75 of the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members. Third plea in law, alleging manifest infringement of the principle of legal certainty and the principle of protection of legitimate expectations and acquired rights, and the consequent infringement of Article 1 of the Additional Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights. ____________