Information;Order — ECLI:EU:T:2025:789
Date: 2025-08-04
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Fifth Chamber
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Procedure: Staff cases - unfounded;Staff cases - inadmissible

Action brought on 24 January 2025 – HM v Commission (Case T-51/25) Language of the case: French Parties Applicant: HM (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: declare the present application admissible and well-founded; annul the decision of 14 March corrected by the decision of 25 March 2024 in which the Commission decided not to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance; annul, if necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint of 14 October 2024; order the defendant to pay all the costs. Pleas in law and main arguments In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law. First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union. Second plea in law, alleging failure to observe the principle of good administration and a manifest error of assessment on the part of the appointing authority in the exercise of its discretion. ____________