Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2019:19
Date: 2019-01-17
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Subject matter: Public procurement in the European Union
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Belgium

Action brought on 23 February 2017 – Proximus v Council (Case T-117/17) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Proximus SA/NV (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Schutyser, lawyer) Defendant: Council of the European Union Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the decision of the Council notified to the applicant on 23 December 2016, to award the contract to another tenderer and not to the applicant ; order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings. Pleas in law and main arguments In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the methodology applied to evaluate the price of the offers does not allow to choose the most economically advantageous offer, which is required by European Union law. ____________