Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2011:383
Date: 2011-07-14
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Germany

Action brought on 12 May 2010 - ratiopharm v OHIM - nycomed (ZUFAL) (Case T -222/10) Language in which the application was lodged: German Parties Applicant: ratiopharm GmbH (Ulm, Germany) (represented by: S. Völker, lawyer) Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: nycomed GmbH (Konstanz, Germany) Form of order sought Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 March 2010 in Case R 874/2008-4; Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs of the proceedings. Pleas in law and main arguments Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant. Community trade mark concerned: Word mark 'ZUFAL' for goods in Class 5. Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: nycomed GmbH Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark 'ZURCAL' for goods in Class 5 and three national word marks 'ZURCAL' for goods in Class 5. Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was upheld. Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed. Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, 1 since there is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks. ____________ 1 - Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).