Order — ECLI:EU:C:2016:599
Date: 2016-07-20
Language of the case: French
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions
Procedure: Appeal - unfounded;Appeal - inadmissible;Action for damages
Origin: Luxembourg

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 July 2016 — Staelen v Ombudsman (Case C‑338/15 P) (1) Appeal — Non-contractual liability — Handling by the European Ombudsman of a complaint concerning the management of a list of suitable candidates following an open competition — Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 181) 1. Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 13, 14, 19, 27-29, 33, 36, 44, 48, 74, 83, 94) 2. Appeal — Grounds — Error of law relied on not identified — Plea lacking precision — Inadmissibility (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d)) (see paras 15-17, 21, 22, 31, 32, 43, 56, 59, 72, 81, 82, 88, 89, 97) 3. Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 73, 98) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Mrs Claire Staelen is ordered to pay the costs. 1 – OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.