Information;Judgment — ECLI:EU:C:2022:945
Date: 2022-12-01
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Subject matter: Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Procedure: Appeal - unfounded;Appeal - inadmissible;Staff cases

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 – European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Guillaume Vincenti (Case C-653/20 P) 1 (Appeal – Civil Service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 45(1) – Promotion – Decision not to promote an official – Article 41(1) and (2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to be heard – Duty to state reasons) Language of the case: German Parties Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and K. Tóth, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt) Other party to the proceedings: Guillaume Vincenti (represented by: H. Tettenborn, acting as Agent) Operative part of the judgment The Court: Dismisses the appeal; Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs. ____________ 1 OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.