Order — ECLI:EU:C:2019:745
Date: 2019-09-16
Language of the case: English
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - unfounded
Origin: Spain

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 16 September 2019 — Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik v Prim (Case C‑421/19 P) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Article 170b of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed) 1. Judicial proceedings — Admissibility of actions — Judged by reference to the situation when the application was lodged — Entry into force of the procedure for determining whether appeals should be allowed to proceed during the period within which an appeal must be lodged — Applicability to an appeal lodged after the entry into force (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a) (see paras 8-10) 2. Appeal — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170) (see paras 12-15) Operative part 1. The appeal is not allowed to proceed. 2. Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik GmbH shall bear its own costs.