Order — ECLI:EU:C:2013:564
Date: 2013-09-05
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions
Procedure: Action for annulment;Appeal - unfounded
Origin: United Kingdom

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 September 2013 – ClientEarth v Council of the European Union, Kingdom of Denmark, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden (Case C-573/11 P) 1 (Appeals – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party – Action for annulment manifestly inadmissible – Grounds of the appeal manifestly unfounded) Language of the case: English Parties Appellant: ClientEarth (represented by: P. Kirch, avocat) Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: C. Fekete and B. Driessen, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Denmark, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden Re: Appeal against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2011 in Case T-452/10 ClientEarth v Council, by which the General Court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible an action seeking the annulment of the decision of the Council of 26 July 2010 refusing to allow the applicant full access to an opinion drafted by the Council Legal Service (document No 6865/09) regarding a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning public access to documents of the European Parliament, of the Council and of the Commission – Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party Operative part of the order The appeal is dismissed. ClientEarth shall pay the costs. ____________ ____________ 1 OJ C 39, 11.2.2012.