Judgment — ECLI:EU:C:2011:323
Date: 2011-05-19
Language of the case: Italian
Court formation: First Chamber
Subject matter: Right of establishment;Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties;Freedom to provide services
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Italy

Summary of the Judgment Union law – Rights conferred on individuals – Infringement by a Member State – Obligation to make good damage caused to individuals – Rules on compensation Union law must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State from relying on the expiry of a reasonable limitation period as a defence in legal proceedings brought by an individual for the purpose of safeguarding rights conferred by a directive, even though the Member State had not transposed that directive correctly, on condition that, by its conduct, that Member State was not responsible for the delay in bringing the action. The finding by the Court that there has been a breach of Union law does not affect the starting point of the limitation period, if that breach is not in doubt. In such a situation, a ruling by the Court that there has been such a breach is not necessary to enable the beneficiaries to ascertain the full extent of their rights. The fact that the period starts to run before that ruling does not therefore render it virtually impossible or excessively difficult to safeguard the rights derived from Union law.