Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2014:614
Date: 2014-07-04
Language of the case: Spanish
Court formation: Fourth Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Spain

Action brought on 2 July 2013 – Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones v OHIM – Copisa Proyectos y Mantenimientos Industriales (CPI COPISA INDUSTRIAL) (Case T -345/13) Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish Parties Applicant: Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela and J. L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyers) Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Copisa Proyectos y Mantenimientos Industriales, SL (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: – Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 April 2013 in Case R 1935/2012-2, granting Community trade mark No 9 600 313 ‘CPI COPISA INDUSTRIAL’ (MIXTA), and order the defendant and, where appropriate, the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs, if that other party appears and contests the action. Pleas in law and main arguments Applicant for a Community trade mark: Copisa Proyectos y Mantenimientos Industriales, SL Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark with the word elements ‘CPI COPISA INDUSTRIAL’ for services in Class 37 – Application for Community trade mark No 9 600 313 Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant. Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative mark with the word elements ‘Cpi construcción promociones e instalaciones, s.a.’ and the national registered trade name No 85 647 ‘Construcción, Promociones e Instalaciones, S.A. – C.P.I.’ for services in Class 37. Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009; Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.