Opinion of the Advocate General — ECLI:EU:C:2022:489
Date: 2022-06-21
Language of the case: Dutch
Subject matter: Asylum policy;Justice and home affairs;Area of freedom, security and justice;Border checks
Procedure: Preliminary reference - urgent procedure;Preliminary reference – inadmissible
Origin: Netherlands

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 23 December 2020 – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C, B (Case C-704/20) Language of the case: Dutch Referring court Raad van State Parties to the main proceedings Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid Respondents: C, B Question referred Does European Union law, more particularly Article 15(2) of the Return Directive (2008/115/EC; OJ 2008 L 348) 1 and Article 9 of the Reception Directive (2013/33/EU; OJ 2013 L 180), 2 read in conjunction with Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2007 C 303/01), require a court of its own motion (ex officio) to assess whether all the conditions pertaining to detention have been met, including those where the foreign national has not disputed that compliance occurred, despite having had the opportunity to do so? ____________ 1 Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98). 2 Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 96).