Opinion of the Advocate General — ECLI:EU:C:2019:393
Date: 2019-05-08
Language of the case: Romanian
Subject matter: Right of establishment;Approximation of laws;Freedom to provide services
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Romania

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 17 April 2018 — Delta Antrepriză de Construcții și Montaj 93 SA v Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA (Case C-267/18) Language of the case: Romanian Referring court Curtea de Apel București Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Delta Antrepriză de Construcții și Montaj 93 SA Defendant: Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA Question referred Can Article 57(4)(g) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC 1 be interpreted as meaning that the termination of a public works contract on the ground that part of the works was subcontracted without the contracting authority’s authorisation constitutes a significant or persistent deficiency in the performance of a substantive requirement under a prior public contract leading to an economic operator being excluded from participation in a public procurement procedure? ____________ 1 OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.