Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2017:845
Date: 2017-11-28
Language of the case: German
Court formation: Fourth Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded
Origin: Germany

Action brought on 25 January 2016 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM (Juwel) (Case T-31/16) Language of the case: German Parties Applicant: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer) Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) Details of the proceedings before OHIM Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Juwel’ — Application for registration No 12 426 888 Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 November 2015 in Case R 2571/2014-1 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the contested decision; order OHIM to pay the costs. Pleas in law Neither Article 7(1)(b) nor Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 is applicable. ____________