Information;Order — ECLI:EU:C:2022:80
Date: 2022-02-01
Language of the case: Spanish
Court formation: Tenth Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions
Procedure: Appeal - unfounded;Appeal - inadmissible;Action for damages;Action for failure to act
Origin: Spain

Summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Unambiguous wording of the form of order sought by the applicant – Requirement not met – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para., and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paras 38, 39) 3. Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court – Error of law relied on not identified – Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para., Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d) and 169) (see paras 49, 53, 54) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. 2. Roberto Alejandro Macías Chávez, Fernando Presencia and José María Castillero Oriol shall bear their own costs.