Information;Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2023:68
Date: 2023-02-15
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Second Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - successful
Origin: Poland

Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 – Mostostal v EUIPO – Polimex – Mostostal (MOSTOSTAL) (Case T-684/21) 1 (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MOSTOSTAL – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Mostostal S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: C. Saettel and K. Krawczyk, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Polimex – Mostostal S.A. (Warsaw) (represented by: J. Kubalski, K. Szczudlik and M. Hyży, lawyers) Re: By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 July 2021 (Case R 2508/2019-5). Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1. Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 July 2021 (Case R 2508/2019-5); 2. Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mostostal S.A.; 3. Orders Polimex – Mostostal S.A. to bear its own costs. ____________ 1 OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.