Order — ECLI:EU:T:2008:293
Date: 2008-07-15
Language of the case: French
Court formation: President of the Chamber
Based on: Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (1957)
Subject matter: Public procurement in the European Union
Concepts: Application for interim measures: suspension of operation of the contested measure and other interim measures;Provisional measures
Procedure: Action for annulment;Application for interim measures
Origin: Belgium

Action brought on 5 June 2008 - CLL Centre de langues v Commission (Case T-202/08) Language of the case: French Parties Applicant: Centre de langues à Louvain-la-Neuve et -en-Woluwe (CLL Centre de langues) (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) (represented by: F. Tulkens and V. Ost, lawyers) Defendant: Commission of the European Communities Form of order sought Annul the rejection decision; Order the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by CLL. Pleas in law and main arguments The applicant disputes the Commission's decision to reject its application to participate in invitation to tender ADMIN/D1/PR/2008/004 regarding language training for staff at the European Union (EU) institutions, bodies and agencies in Brussels (OJ 2008 S 44-060121), on the ground that the application was submitted after the deadline stated in the contract notice. In support of its action, the applicant submits that the contested decision is based on an incorrect supposition that the awarding authority is required to reject all late applications to participate. The applicant takes the view, on the contrary, that the awarding authority has a margin of discretion in that regard. Furthermore, the applicant submits that the contested decision is not sufficiently reasoned, since the Commission has not explained why it has not exercised its discretionary powers. Finally, the applicant raises a plea alleging breach of Article 123 of the implementing rules, 1 according to which the number of candidates invited to tender must be sufficient to ensure genuine competition, and the disproportionate nature of the rejection of the applicant's application. ____________ 1 - Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, p. 1).