Information;Order — ECLI:EU:C:2022:1009
Date: 2022-12-19
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Tenth Chamber
Subject matter: Provisions governing the Institutions;Data protection
Procedure: Appeal - unfounded;Action for failure to act;Action for failure to act - inadmissible

Summary statement of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Unambiguous wording of the form of order sought by the applicant – Requirement not met – Inadmissibility (Art. 263 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para., and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paragraphs 12, 13, 18, 21, 22) 2. Appeal – Grounds – Specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning necessary (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paragraphs 26, 27) 3. Appeal – Grounds – Ground raised against a ground of the order which is not essential to its operative part – Invalid ground of appeal (Art. 256(1), second subpara., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paragraph 29) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. 2. Mr Ahmad Aziz shall bear his own costs.