Judgment;Information — ECLI:EU:T:2024:747
Date: 2024-10-23
Language of the case: English
Based on: Merger Treaty (1965)
Subject matter: Staff regulations and employment conditions - EC
Procedure: Staff cases - unfounded;Staff cases - successful

summary of reasons included in the decision as a hyperlink. In its reply of 2 May 2022 to the request for review, the Selection Board further confirmed that decision by merely repeating the reasoning of the initial decision of 7 March 2022. No precise explanation allowing the applicant to understand the reason for the Selection Board’s decision was provided. Fourth plea in law, alleging, in the alternative and as regards the third contested decision, an infringement of the competition notice rule on the eligibility of the candidates. The applicant submits that the third contested decision is also unlawful since it confirms the application of criteria that infringe the notice of competition. Fifth plea in law, alleging, in the alternative and as regards the third contested decision, a manifest error in the application of the new criteria established by the Selection Board. The applicant submits that even if it were to be accepted that the Selection Board correctly defined new eligibility criteria (quod non), it should still be noted that the Selection Board committed a manifest error of assessment in their application. ____________