Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2016:115
Date: 2016-03-01
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Third Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - successful
Origin: Germany

Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2016 — 1&1 Internet v OHIM — Unoe Bank (1e1) (Case T-61/15) 1 (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark 1e1 — Earlier national word mark UNO E and earlier figurative mark unoe — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: 1&1 Internet AG (Montabaur, Germany) (represented by: G. Klopp, lawyer) Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Unoe Bank, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: N. González-Alberto Rodríguez, lawyer) Re: Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 (Case R 101/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Unoe Bank, SA and 1&1 Internet AG. Operative part of the judgment The Court: Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 (Case R 101/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Unoe Bank, SA and 1&1 Internet AG; Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by 1&1 Internet AG; Orders Unoe Bank, SA to bear its own costs. ____________ 1 OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.