Order — ECLI:EU:T:2015:559
Date: 2015-07-17
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Environment
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded;Action for annulment - inadmissible;Application to intervene - decision unnecessary
Origin: Belgium

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2015 — EEB v Commission (Case T-565/14) 1 (Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Commission decision concerning the notification by Poland of a transitional national plan as referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions — Refusal of internal review — Measure of individual scope — Aarhus Convention — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Lateness — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any foundation in law) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Podskalská, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin, S. Petrova and G. Wilms, acting as Agents) Re: Application, first, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 804 final of 17 February 2014 on the notification by the Republic of Poland of a transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU, on industrial emissions, and, secondly, for annulment of the Commission Decision of 12 June 2014 (Ares (2014) 1915757) declaring inadmissible the applicant’s request that the Commission review its decision of 17 February 2014. Operative part of the order The action is dismissed. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of the Council of the European Union, the European Parliament and the Republic of Poland. European Environmental Bureau (EEB) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. EEB, the Commission, the Council, the Parliament and the Republic of Poland shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene. ____________ 1 OJ C 395, 10.11.2014.