Information;Judgment — ECLI:EU:T:2023:317
Date: 2023-06-07
Language of the case: English
Court formation: Seventh Chamber
Subject matter: Trade marks;Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Procedure: Action for annulment - unfounded;Action for annulment - inadmissible
Origin: Italy;Sweden

Action brought on 21 April 2022 – Roxtec v EUIPO – Wallmax (Representation of a blue square containing eight concentric black circles) (Case T-218/22) Language in which the application was lodged: English Parties Applicant: Roxtec AB (Karlskrona, Sweden) (represented by: J. Olsson and J. Adamsson, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wallmax Srl (Milano, Italy) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of a blue square containing eight concentric black circles) – European Union trade mark No 7 376 023 Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2022 in Case R 1093/2021-2 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Second Board of Appeal of the EUIPO for reconsideration; or alter the contested decision by removing the last sentence of paragraph 31 from the decision; and order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in these proceedings. Pleas in law Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; Infringement of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. ____________