Judgment;Summary — ECLI:EU:C:2019:473
Date: 2019-06-06
Language of the case: Hungarian
Court formation: Sixth Chamber
Subject matter: Area of freedom, security and justice;Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Procedure: Reference for a preliminary ruling
Origin: Hungary

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szekszárdi Járásbíróság (Hungary) lodged on 5 June 2018 — Ágnes Weil v Géza Gulácsi (Case C-361/18) Language of the case: Hungarian Referring court Szekszárdi Járásbíróság Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Ágnes Weil Defendant: Géza Gulácsi Questions referred Is Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 1 to be interpreted as meaning that, if requested by one of the parties, the court of the Member State that delivered the decision must issue the certificate relating to the decision automatically, without examining if [the case] falls within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012? If the answer to the first question is in the negative, is Article 1(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that a repayment action between members of an unregistered non-marital partnership fall within the scope of the rights in property arising out of a relationship deemed by the law applicable to such relationship to have comparable (legal) effects to marriage? ____________ 1 Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).