Order — ECLI:EU:T:2004:332
Date: 2004-11-10
Language of the case: English
Court formation: President of the Chamber
Based on: Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (1957)
Subject matter: Public procurement in the European Union
Concepts: Application for interim measures: suspension of operation of the contested measure and other interim measures;Provisional measures
Procedure: Action for annulment;Application for interim measures - unfounded;Application for measures of inquiry - unfounded
Origin: Greece

Summary of the Order 1. Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable damage – Burden of proof – Causal link between the alleged damage and the contested act (Art. 242 EC) 2. Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable damage – Financial loss (Art. 242 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) 3. Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable damage – Non-financial loss (Art. 242 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) 1. The urgency of an application for interim measures must be assessed in relation to the need for an interim order in order to avoid serious and irreparable damage being caused to the party seeking the interim measure. It is for that party to adduce proof that it cannot await the outcome of the main action without suffering such damage. Therefore, if the applicant does not show a link between the alleged damage and the acts suspension of whose operation is sought, the interim measures cannot be regarded as relevant and necessary for avoiding the occurrence of the alleged damage. (see paras 65-66, 70) 2. Pecuniary damage cannot in principle be regarded as irreparable, or even reparable only with difficulty, if it may be the subject of subsequent compensation by means, for example, of an action for compensation under Article 288 EC. (see para. 72) 3. The decision not to award a public contract does not necessarily have the consequence of causing irreparable harm to the reputation and credibility of the tenderers which are not successful. Taking part in a public tender procedure, by nature highly competitive, necessarily involves risks for all the participants and the elimination of a tenderer under the tender rules is not in itself in any way prejudicial. (see para. 82)