Consumer complaint received 2016-06-29
Product: Debt collection — Mortgage
Issue: Disclosure verification of debt — Not given enough info to verify debt
Company: BWW Law Group, LLC (MD)

email information to cfpb ombudsman team The office of XXXX ombudsman team party XXXX XXXX making the representation had knowledge or belief that the representation was false, or made the representation with the requisite indifference to the truth. 
acts contrary to honesty and justice why these document was fabricated and doctored documents.Representation was made with the intent to induce the recipient to act, or refrain from acting. 
Recipient acted or did not act in justifiable reliance on the representation. 
Recipient suffered damages as a result.XXXX OF THE OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN TEAM WITH XXXX XXXX XXXX 1. Representation was made of a material fact. 
2. Representation was untrue. 
3. Party making the representation knew it was untrue. 
4. Representation was made with the intent to deceive and for the purpose of inducing the recipient to act upon it. 
5. Recipient justifiably relied on the representation. 
6. By relying on the untrue statement, the recipient suffered damages. XXXX Misconduct in Other States XXXX. XXXX and XXXX While XXXX and XXXX provided much of the news for reports on attorney misconduct, other states ' attorneys managed to earn negative attention as well. Foreclosure law firms in XXXX and XXXX admitted to committing serious misconduct. Attorneys at XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and at XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX admitted that other attorneys had signed their signatures in documents submitted to court.XXXX Several notaries had their licenses revoked and the XXXX Court of Appeals adopted a rule allowing courts to appoint independent attorneys to review foreclosure documents for irregularities. The firm took signature pages of bank or servicer employees from affidavits and attached them to other affidavits as needed.XXXX Attorneys signed affidavits that contained blank spaces for amounts to be charged.XXXX A former process server who worked for a company XXXX XXXX hired also cast " " light on sketchy practices. When questioned about records that showed XXXX to XXXX effectuations of service of process over a three day period XX/XX/XXXX ( for a total of {$30000.00} a day ) on XXXX files, the process server quipped, " 'There 's no way they could have that many legitimate papers [... ] There were only XXXX of us who worked the county. ' '' XXXX Later, in XXXX XXXX, XXXX announced the closure of his law firm.XXXX XXXX '' voluntarily de-listed its shares '' from XXXX after the stock dropped to " pennies '' from a year-high of XXXX And thus ended the dazzling rise of XXXX XXXX which had made him wealthy beyond most Americans ' wildest dreams. 
While dealing with multiple lawsuits, XXXX faced further consternation when the XXXX Bar filed a complaint against him alleging that XXXX violated a court order requiring a response to a lawsuit. 
Like XXXX, XXXX attracted litigation and controversy over his methods. XXXX 's firm was prone to the same kinds of errors XXXX was, including failing to divulge mortgage payments and filing of shady assignments. 
including failing to divulge mortgage payments and filing of shady XXXX The XXXX XXXX XXXX 
Bankruptcy XXXX 's office revealed it " had its [... ] office monitoring cases involving the XXXX firm, '' and various judges threw out cases in which XXXX filed questionable XXXX Attorneys who took over representation of XXXX XXXX that XXXX XXXX filed inaccurate documentation to try to fix missing chain of title XXXX BWW LAW FIRM ARE DOING THIS Judge XXXX XXXX , who has become a kind of folk hero to homeowners ' advocates for his sharply worded anti-bank opinions, discovered XXXX XXXX representing both sides of a lawsuit.XXXX XXXX reportedly came under " repeated criticism by state judges for his practices. '' The firm was a li