Consumer complaint received 2017-11-30
Product: Checking or savings account — Checking account
Issue: Managing an account — Funds not handled or disbursed as instructed
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY (NY)

Unlawful Tactics that the Centralized Banks Use to XXXX up their customers accounts. 
I am writing to request an investigation be done on Wells Fargo Bank. It is my confirmed belief that I have been victimized financially by unethical banking practice contrary to consumer protection laws and electronic account manipulation. I opened account XXXX/XXXX/XXXX for sole purpose of paying my mortgage and mortgage related escrow only. ( This was before I was aware of the scam and lack of standing of Wells Fargo Bank ) Wells illegally crosslinked my XXXX XXXX Card XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX account to this Wells checking account without my knowledge or consent to generate enormous fees for themselves and cause my XXXX XXXX card account to be closed. I had never authorized the Wells checking account to be linked with XXXX neither to Wells or XXXX. At that time I was utilizing my XXXX  checking account with my XXXX XXXX Card. I had discovered the problem between XXXX XXXX, XXXX and XXXX XXXX, XXXX while making a small purchase at XXXX with my XXXX card. The cashier informed me my XXXX card was declined because of insufficient funds to my complete surprise. The date of this illegal crosslinking according to the XXXX representative I spoke to from their corporate headquarters was on XXXX XXXX, XXXX at XXXX The result of this action by Wells generated fees in the amount of {$530.00} and nine letters being sent in one day to my address. I believe this also had an adverse effect on my escrow account, another deliberate attempt on the part of Wells to disrupt my mortgage with them. 
Failure of CFPB deep state employee to flag problem : I am not satisfied with the response : re-open XXXX YOUR COMPLAINT I am writing to request an investigation be done on Wells Fargo Bank. It is my confirmed belief that I have been victimized financially by unethical banking practice contrary to consumer protection laws and electronic account manipulation. I opened account XXXX/XXXX/XXXX for sole purpose of paying my mortgage and mortgage related escrow only. Wells illegally crosslinked my XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX account to this Wells checking account without my knowledge or consent to generate enormous fees for themselves and cause my XXXX XXXX card account to be closed. I had never authorized the Wells checking account to be linked with XXXX  neither to Wells or XXXX. At that time I was utilizing my XXXX checking account with my XXXX XXXX  Card. I had discovered the problem between XXXX XXXX, XXXX and XXXX XXXX, XXXX while making a small purchase at XXXX with my XXXX card. The cashier informed me my XXXX card was declined because of insufficient funds to my complete surprise. The date of this illegal crosslinking according to the XXXX representative I spoke to from their corporate headquarters was on XXXX XXXX, XXXX at XXXX The result of this action by Wells generated fees in the amount of {$530.00} and nine letters being sent in one day to my address. I believe this also had an adverse effect on my escrow account, another deliberate attempt on the part of Wells to disrupt my mortgage with them.

Response to continued failure of CFPB to investigate on their deep state centralized banking cartel.

The response is a lame excuse for the unlawful crosslinking of my XXXX account to my Wells Fargo Checking account. This is just another tactic of unlawful tampering and manipulation in the electronic centralized banking system designed to commit fraud upon the consumer by making it appear that the crosslink was due to some action that I took. The only purpose for Wells to do this is to disrupt and unlawfully steal property. Their excuse that they do not have any connection to XXXX is irrelevant to the point of " unlawful '' crosslinking and electronic manipulation. I would like to know who the " deep state '' employee who reviewed this case is?. I want the case reopened as I am sure this account manipulation is probably nationwide. 

REOPEN CASE