Consumer complaint received 2016-09-07
Product: Credit reporting — 
Issue: Credit reporting company's investigation — Investigation took too long
Company: EQUIFAX, INC. (OH)

My credit report has been ok until this month XXXX. With information not belonging me XXXX XXXX ( Auto ) {$1300.00} XXXX XXXX $ XXXX ( other ) No proof of debt INCORRECT ADDRESS : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Not Mine XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, OH Not Mine XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Other ) {$46.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Auto ) {$200.00} NOT MINE, The disputed accounts where reported removed from Equifax in XXXX 2015 per attached reports. only to show up again. 
No proof of debt validation of debts I do not owe EQUIFAX has not only been evasive over my report, they have never provided the requested and official documentation required by law, nor have they corrected or prevent this wrong information from staying off my report. Not once have they provided me valid proof that it was mine NOR that I had a contract with either of this company, nor have they corrected the information. 

Pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC 1692g ( Sec. 809 ) and The Fair Credit Reporting Act, Section 611, part B, subsection ( iii ) 611 Procedure in case of disputed accuracy [ 15 U.S.C. 1681i ] ( 6 ) ( B ) Contents. That the claim that I owe them is not valid, and that I requested validation, and additionally I demanded proof of this debt, specifically the alleged contract or other instrument bearing my signature, as well as proof of their authority in this matter. 1. Please evidence your authorization under 15 USC 1692 ( e ) and 15 USC 1692 ( f ) in this alleged matter. 2. What is your authorization of law for your collection of information? 3. What is your authorization of law for your collection of this alleged debt? 4. Please evidence your authorization to do business or operate in this state. 5. Please evidence proof of the alleged debt, including specifically the alleged contract or other instrument bearing my signature. 6. Please provide a complete account history, including any charges added for collection activity. This type of practice is not only upsetting but the authority and power these people have over other consumers presumably is also very illegal. They obviously are not willing to provide this which is even further illegal. 

The Fair Credit Reporting Act, Section 611, part B, subsection ( iii ) 611 Procedure in case of disputed accuracy [ 15 U.S.C. 1681i ] ( 6 ) ( B ) Contents. As part of, or in addition to, the notice under subparagraph ( A ), a consumer reporting agency shall provide to a consumer in writing before the expiration of the 5-day period referred to in subparagraph ( A ) ( i ) a statement that the reinvestigation is completed ; ( ii ) a consumer report that is based upon the consumer 's file as that file is revised as a result of the reinvestigation ; ( iii ) a notice that, if requested by the consumer, a description of the procedure used to determine the accuracy and completeness of the information shall be provided to the consumer by the agency, including the business name and address of any furnisher of information contacted in connection with such information and the telephone number of such furnisher, if reasonably available ; I am disappointed that you have failed to maintain reasonable procedures to assure complete accuracy in the information you publish, and insist you comply with the law by providing correction of the information within the 5 days to avoid sue. I further ask that you look into the practices of this company and these collection charges brought against me that since it is the Bureaus RESPONSIBILITY to clean Reports. To be ID Theft Victim is no joking matters with credit. Please Delete or encounter Suing at XXXX County Court XXXX Ohio.