Consumer complaint received 2015-10-21
Product: Mortgage — Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure — 
Company: Onity Group Inc. (FL)

Docket can be found at : XXXX under ( new ) case inquiry, XXXX-In XX/XX/XXXX a foreclosure was file against my property. After many summary judgments and a few sales which I managed to reverse. 
-Lack of prosecution ( LOP ) notice was filed on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, Docket # XXXX for plaintiff XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX an answer to XXXX. 
-Novastar XXXX operations in early XXXX. 
-Plaintiffs attorneys filed for substitution of party plaintiff on or about XXXX XXXX, XXXX to XXXX as successor trustee under XXXX XXXX funding Trust, XXXX. 
-Plaintiff finally obtained final summary judgment in XXXX XXXX. 
-I appealed in XXXX XXXX. 
-Sale was set for XX/XX/XXXX but the cancelled due to investor problems. 
-Sale was rescheduled for XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 
-In the int rum I filed a Federal, FDCPA, FCCPA case against debt collector attorneys servicer and bank. 
-House was sold on XXXX XXXX, XXXX but reversed by plaintiffs attorney because they forgot to show up at the sale and the sale price was to low. 
-Mandate and opinion ( appellate win ) was entered in my favor XXXX XXXX, XXXX. ( attached file ) -Once I received opinion I voluntarily dismissed the Federal case against all party 's. 
-This case laid dormant up until XXXX/XXXX/XXXX where counsel was substituted and case was reinstated by order on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. 
-Plaintiffs filed a XXXX amended complaint on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX again changing the party plaintiffs name. 
MY COMPLAINT. 
After becoming aware of the CFPB consent order with Ocwen It appears to me that Ocwen is still manufacturing/fabricating false documents to obtain jurisdiction to foreclose and steal properties with no standing to foreclose. I have attached several documents for your review that show on their face that there is a high probability that the attorney firm, Ocwen and plaintiff are working in concert to make it appear to the court that they have standing to foreclose and to get around the opinion of the appellate courts decision. My opinion is that it is a very poor attempt and, I hate to say it, but laughable at least. It appears that they are committing fraud upon the court and because they caused certain documents to be filed in the public record and quite possibly in violation of Florida criminal code Sec. 817.535 and the Florida RICO XXXX and other violations under sec. 817.15, false affidavits, sec. 817.155, sec. 817.16, false officers. 
If you look at the documents attached it is crystal clear that a poor attempt has been executed and filed on the record. They can not unring the bell. 
The allonge they included with the latest filing appears to be manufactured. I attached the file ( copy of note initial filing of suit and copy filed and copy filed recently.. ). which was supported with an affidavit of lost note, an affidavit of lost note was also filed back in XX/XX/XXXX by the initial law firm. The endorsement appears to be manufactured for purposes of bringing XXXX XXXX into the game. If you compare the original filing of suit with copy of note the endorsement is not there. So how did this endorsement appear on a lost note? 
How did the assignment XX/XX/XXXX ( attached ) transfer the lost note to Ocwen by XXXX who has been defunct for many years? KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS WAS PREPARED BY OCWEN. 
I am running out of space so I am hoping that you can see what I see on the face of the documents. 
One more point I would like to add. 
The appeal court did make a couple of mistakes which I only caught recently. 
When they mention assignment from XXXX to XXXX XXXX not on record prepared by then Law Firm and back dated, they were incorrect, Please review attached ( assignment XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX Mortgage assigned to XXXX. Not XXXX XXXX. ( attached, appellate win ) XXXX did not seek to recover lost note, XXXX did. And some of the dates are off. 
I am out of characters, looking forward.