Consumer complaint received 2017-07-25
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports — Other personal consumer report
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing issue — Difficulty submitting a dispute or getting information about a dispute over the phone
Company: Early Warning Services, LLC (FL)

On XX/XX/XXXX I was in a agreement XXXX XXXX FOR DEBIT CARD I was denied activation By a third party Early Warning XXXX XXXX after I secured XXXX Funds on a recorded call Tuesday afternoon @ XXXX XXXX eastern time I was told that based on information In there database server they collect information to deprive Certain ethic group based on color statues of law Which is violating 42U.S.C 1983 SECTION is a federal Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the XXXX XXXX XXXX , subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer 's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the XXXX XXXX XXXX shall be considered to be a statute of the XXXX XXXX XXXX. 42 U.S.C. 1983 ( emphasis added ). Section 1983 was enacted on XX/XX/XXXX as part of the Civil Rights Act of XXXX, and is also known as the " XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX '' because one of its primary purposes was to provide a civil remedy against the abuses that were being committed in the southern states, especially by the XXXX XXXX XXXX. While the existing law protected all citizens in theory, its protection in practice was unavailable to some because those persons charged with the enforcement of the laws were unable or unwilling to do so. [ 1 ] The Act was intended to provide a private remedy for such violations of federal law, and has subsequently been interpreted to create a species of tort liability. [ 2 ] The number of cases that have been brought under section 1983 has dramatically increased since XX/XX/XXXX when the Supreme Court decided XXXX v. XXXX. [ 3 ] In XXXX, the Supreme Court held that a police officer was acting " under color of state law '' even though his actions violated state law. [ 4 ] This was the first case in which the Supreme Court allowed liability to attach where a government official acted outside the scope of the authority granted to him by state law. Since XXXX v. XXXX was decided, an extensive body of law has developed to govern section 1983 claims. This article is intended to provide an overview of that extensive body of law, and will include seminal precedent from the United States Supreme Court and the XXXX Circuit Court of Appeals -- a comprehensive study of all law related to section 1983 is beyond the scope of this article. I was XXXX XXXX XXXX and took to XXXX from a homeless shelter for a paid child support payment because illegal color of laws Will address the Supreme highcourt on this matter