Consumer complaint received 2024-01-06
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports — Other personal consumer report
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing issue — Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Company: LEXISNEXIS (DC)

Contrary to my rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, LexisNexis has a ) maintained inaccurate information that was previously disputed on my report, b ) not provided " a description of the procedure used to determine the accuracy and completeness of disputed information, '' and c ) not " [ furnished ] notification of the deletion of disputed information ... who has received a LexisNexis consumer report ... '' Including but not limited to the following inaccuracies still remain, referencing the 42-page document with Consumer Number : XXXX and Case Number : XXXX : On Total Pages 5 of 42 : - XXXX XXXXXXXX is not my name. ( inaccuracy ) This record needs to be disputed. 
- XXXX XXXX is not my name. ( inaccuracy ) This record needs to be disputed. 
- XXXX is not my date of birth. ( inaccuracy ) This record needs to be disputed. 

On Total Pages 6 of 42 : - XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX is not a valid address ( inaccuracy ) and is contained within multiple entries ( on Total Pages 7-9 of 42 ) within this report. This record needs to be disputed. 
- XXXX, XXXX XXXXXXXX is not a valid address ( inaccuracy ) This record needs to be disputed. 
- INVALID is not one of my phone numbers. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXX XXXXXXXX is an unrecognized source. ( inaccuracy ) This record needs to be disputed. 

On Total Pages 14 of 42  : - Under Record 3, name " XXXX XXXX '' is invalid. ( inaccuracy ) This record needs to be disputed. 

On Total Pages 19-20 of 42 : - Under Record 1, " XXXX '' was not a policy I was insured under ; the record is invalid ( inaccuracy ). When this record was disputed with LexisNexis, LexisNexis failed to remove the record and also failed to provide " a description of the procedure used to determine the accuracy and completeness of disputed information, '' a consumer right under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. This record was already disputed and mis-handled by LexisNexis. 

On Total Pages 21 of 42 : - Under Record 3, I was never licensed in VA nor have a date of birth of XXXX ( invalid birth year ; inaccuracy ). This record needs to be disputed. 
- Under Record 2 ( at the bottom of the page ), the court never ruled a conviction of " EXCEED XXXX OR XXXX XXXX FOR ALL VEHICLES BY XXXX XXXX. '' This record needs to be disputed. The conviction was, as the record ( Record XXXX ) right above states and rather, " VIOLATE HAZARD REGULATION. '' On Total Pages 22 of 42 : - Under Record 3, it says the conviction was " XX/XX/25 SP. '' This record needs to be disputed. The conviction was, as the record ( Record XXXX ) below states and rather, " XX/XX/25 SPEED. '' On Total Pages 29 of 42 : - " XXXX '' is not a policy I was insured under. When this record was disputed with LexisNexis, LexisNexis failed to remove the record and also failed to provide " a description of the procedure used to determine the accuracy and completeness of disputed information, '' a consumer right under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. This record was already disputed and mis-handled by LexisNexis.