Consumer complaint received 2018-10-21
Product: Debt collection — Other debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed — Debt is not yours
Company: U.S. Collections West, Inc. (AZ)

A ) Intro : Fraudulent Submission to Debt Collection Agencies & Others On or about XX/XX/XXXX [ after a 5+ year stint trying to gain up most favorable resolution ] ; judgment by Superior Courts of XXXX County has finally been served but not before substantial damage ( s ) had been done from trying to resolve every illegal aspect set-forth by Former Landlord and his Co-Conspirers for simply complaining being delivered a cockroach pest infested slum conditioned dump. 

So a simple [ but rightful and legal Former Tenant dispute ] against Former Landlord led to Former Landlord intentionally breaching lease agreement contract and intentionally to have violated Arizona Residential Landlord Tenant Act ; then after conducting such negligence that led to being " Wrongfully Evicted ''! 

Former Landlord drummed up false allegations and fraudulently submitted me to numerous debt collection agencies and various other agencies in manner to collect on a debt I never was responsible for ; then intentionally gave no cooperation for resolve ; while intentionally failed to have made, any type of appropriate resolve prior to Superior Court Judge to have finalized her XX/XX/XXXX decision. 

In manner how Superior Court Judge rendered judgment ; Superior Court judge did not relieve full story within in it's entirety of truth to what actually was set-forth before courts in a self-representing manner so resolve could be gained in full against negligence and fraudulent misconduct. In Superior Court Judge 's XX/XX/XXXX Minute Entry ; confirmation can be found to confirm Superior Court Judge did not relieve full story ; however, attached supporting documentation can fill the gaps to being fraudulently submitted to debt collection agencies. 

B ) About Attached Supporting Documentation : Due to in-depth-ness of Pure Fraud that involved Identity theft and Theft by Fraud ; without my presence to give testimony to each attached document ; and because, supporting documentation upload is limited to 10MB, not all documentation to support Consumer Complaint may upload ; but that which can be uploaded will simply reveal at a glance Fraudulent Misconduct of Pure Fraud, Identity theft, and Theft by Fraud and Fraudulent submission to debt collection agencies. 

Because Superior Courts failed to relieve full story of circumstances and only gave a summation ; in essence to lessen any considerable confusion that could occur from readings hereof and/or from attached documents ; it might be much easier to [ first and foremost ] review Superior Court 's documented Minute Entries from date of ... 

1 ) XX/XX/XXXX where expresses " I did nothing wrong '' and was not the party to have breached lease and violated Arizona Residential Landlord Tenant Act.

2 ) By doing so? 

It can become more understandable to my mentioning actions taken by Former Landlord and his Co-Conspirers from onset of dispute ; along with any and all other agencies used to help them carry out their Fraudulent actions ; all parties involved was set to gain profits out of and from negligent misconduct which makes for Pure Fraud that involves identity theft, and Theft by Fraud ; as to my strong belief, that! 

Former Landlord and/or anyone of his Co-Conspirers falsified a document to lease agreement contract thus stole my identity by forging my signature to make it appear as though I signature signed the false document in manner falsified document could match with their false allegation they set-forth in courts as defense ; by stating.. 

Plaintiff, without Defendant 's permission or release, surrendered possession of keys and apartment on XX/XX/XXXX. In doing so, Plaintiff willfully and intentionally breached the rental agreement to which he was a party. 

Provided in " Section C '' as follows is " Background Scope & Analysis '' that brings to forefront action of Fraudulent Misconduct worthy to be reported for Consumer Attention Getting Action ; Section C helps substantiate attached documents ; and attached documents help substantiates my " Consumer Complaint '' to how Fraud, Identity theft, and Theft by Fraud occurred as never should have been submitted to debt agencies. 

C ) Scope & Background Analysis : On or about XX/XX/XXXX lease agreement contract was entered into with former Landlord XXXX  XXXX at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, AZ XXXX. On or about XX/XX/XXXX because I complained to [ former landlord ] who intentionally delivered a cockroach pest infested slum conditioned dump that needed much remedy and repair. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX a dispute onset from my written notification expressing being delivered a cockroach pest infested slum conditioned dump ; and hereafter and from this point forward, Former Landlord and his co-conspirers failed to perform any duties held within the lease agreement contract ; or in other words, Former Landlord intentionally breached lease agreement and intentionally violated Arizona Residential Landlord Statues. 

According to Arizona Residential Landlord Tenant Act statue Article 5. Retaliatory Action 33-1381, Retaliatory conduct prohibited establishes a Landlord may not retaliate by brining or threatening to bring an action for possession after a Tenant complained to landlord of a violation under section 33-1324. 

I made numerous written complaints expressing to Former Landlord infractions that violated Arizona Residential Landlord Tenant Act statue 33-1324. According to Arizona Residential Landlord Tenant Act Article 4 Remedies statue 33-1361 Non-compliance by the landlord ; establishes if a landlord failed to make remedy within five ( 5 ) days of written notification the lease agreement contract terminates. 

Instead of Former Landlord making resolution or to have made mutual resolve no later than noon on date of XX/XX/XXXX to mutually term lease ; Former Landlord intentionally maintained me to lease agreement with no intentions ever settling any matters but rather elected to expense time, money, and effort avoiding accepting responsibilities and liabilities for their negligent misconduct ; that came to be discovered as " Fraud ''. 

D ) Former Landlord with Co-Conspirers Wrongfully Sued to Evict : With efforts to wrongfully gain possession by prohibited retaliatory misconduct. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX alleging Former Landlord hired an attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX # XXXX XXXX, AZ XXXX [ that together working in harmony ] along with XXXX XXXX XXXX located at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, AZ XXXX [ who is named within the lease as Property Manager ] intentionally and illegally made it appear as though I was the " at fault party '' to have breached the lease. 

Prior to illegal act of being wrongfully evicted ; Former Landlord " prohibited by law '' retaliated numerous times before bringing an Eviction Action against me as XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX was the party to have " legally '' made it appear as though Former Landlord and XXXX XXXX XXXX had every legal right to evict, by citing, I failed to pay rent for month of XX/XX/XXXX ; but yet, rent for month of XX/XX/XXXX was contract termed as FREE ; therefore, the act itself was intentional breach of lease agreement and of wrongful eviction. 

E ) Motive for Committing Fraud by Wrongful Eviction : Arizona Residential Landlord Tenant Act Article 4 Remedies statue 33-1361 establishes ... if there is a noncompliance by the landlord with section 33-1324 materially effecting health and safety, tenant may deliver a written notice to the landlord specifying acts and omissions constituting the breach, the rental agreement will terminate upon a date not less than five days after receipt of the notice if the breach is not remedied in five days. 

When take into account Former Landlord and XXXX XXXX XXXX intentionally breached entire lease agreement contract by failing to perform lease agreement contract obligated duties ; plus, intentionally violated statues of Arizona Residential Landlord Tenant Act, then further take into account, that? 

a ) Former Landlord failed to move me to another rental unit as mutual resolve prior to noon on XX/XX/XXXX b ) Former Landlord failed to make any remedies to rental unit # XXXX prior to noon on XX/XX/XXXX. 
c ) Former Landlord had no intentions to mutually term lease agreement by noon on XX/XX/XXXX. 
d ) Because Former Landlord failed to come to a mutual resolve no later than XX/XX/XXXX. 
XXXX ) From on or about XX/XX/XXXX that moved through XX/XX/XXXX I delivered numerous written notifications requesting Former Landlord to make remedy to former rental unit # XXXX  ; but no remedies were ever made. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX actions that XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and company under took filing a false " Complaint Eviction Action constituted intentional breach of lease agreement that meant under Arizona Residential Landlord Tenant Act statue 33-1321.

Former Landlord had an obligated duty to return my move-in costs of security deposit of {$50.00} dollars for securing a unit and return pro-rated expense of {$190.00} expensed for XX/XX/XXXX rent ; but yet, when learned from my written notification ( s ) of XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX I wanted to mutually term the lease ; Former Landlord had no intention ever returning move-in costs of {$240.00}. 

Because I had interest to mutually term lease agreement by noon on XX/XX/XXXX ; Former Landlord knew he would be losing my business of a 6 month lease agreement term that amounted to {$3000.00} dollars. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX Former Landlord teamed with XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and on XX/XX/XXXX ; Former Landlord and his co-conspirers wrongfully sued to evict to have made it appear as though I was the " at fault '' party to have failed to pay rent for XX/XX/XXXX which means? 

Former Landlord 's only true intentions were to commit FRAUD which extents prior to lease agreement contract to have commenced into effect but took pursuing civil legal action in Superior Courts of XXXX County before cold hard facts of Theft by Fraud, Identity Theft, and Pure Fraud could unravel in full. 

F ) How Action of Fraud By Wrongful Eviction Was Masked : The act of Former Landlord, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and their representing Attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to have filed a sue to evict action in court of law was not only an act to avoid accepting responsibility liability for their negligent misconduct. 

The act of Former Landlord and his co-conspirers to have falsely filed a Complaint Eviction Action in small claims judicial was mere smoke and mirrors to mask the act of committing FRAUD! 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX I filed my answer reply to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 's fraudulent and falsified " Complaint Eviction Action '' ; included within my answer reply were my exhibit of " Concession Addendum '' exhibiting XX/XX/XXXX rent was contract termed as FREE. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX I was set to appear to court to defense against Former Landlord 's falsified allegation ( to have allegedly ) failed to pay rent for month of XX/XX/XXXX in essence Former Landlord and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX could not gain judgment by default ; for if held true, that if, Former Landlord and XXXX XXXX XXXX had every legal right to sue to evict for my failure to pay rent for XX/XX/XXXX. 

Former Landlord and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX through their counsel XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX would not have voluntarily dismissed their own small claims court case on XX/XX/XXXX without prejudice but rather allowed for court Judge of smalls claims judicial to settle any dispute to whether or not suing to evict was proper and the most needed action worthy to be carried out, but? 

Action taken by Former Landlord and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. though their counsel XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX were of no accident but rather an intentional strategic act voluntarily dismissing their small claims court case for purpose I would not appear to testify against their false Complaint Eviction Action '' as any judge to have resided over my testimony and evidence immediately would have seen rent payment was not due until XXXX XXXX. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and company filed a false " Complaint Eviction Action '' cause their intent was not to settle any matters but rather commit FRAUD by making it legally appear as though I would be the at fault party to have failed to pay XX/XX/XXXX rent in manner to keep and maintain my move-in costs of {$240.00}, and in manner to keep expensed court costs of {$45.00} dollars it cost for me to defend against a false allegation ; while all at the same time, profit gain legal fees, and other costs deemed by Former Landlord despite their negligence ; but as so happened to be? 

On or XX/XX/XXXX I gave spoils to Former Landlord, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ; and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 's fraudulent act of making false allegation in small claims courts of justice whence I filed my court answer reply to being wrongfully evicted, as you would think?

Former Landlord and his Co-Conspirers would have ceased their Fraudulent Misconduct on this day of XX/XX/XXXX ; but Former Landlord and his Co-Conspirers were non-phased, they simply had more than one ( 1 ) way to commit FRAUD at getting me submitted to Debt Collection agencies. 

G ) Former Landlord and his Co-conspirers Forced Civil Legal Action : On or about XX/XX/XXXX hereafter XXXX XXXX XXXX dismissed their falsely filed and fraudulent " Complaint Eviction Action '' ; I made attempts to make resolve with Former Landlord in manner to recover incurred damages no later than XX/XX/XXXX ; and alerting if no resolve was made by XX/XX/XXXX, I would pursue civil legal action. 

Instead of Former Landlord making attempt ( s ) to make resolve no later than XXXX XXXX? 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX Former Landlord delivered a " Move Out Statement '' alleging debt owed {$3400.00} to which I did not understand such charges since rent for month of XX/XX/XXXX was contract termed as free. 

Instead of Former Landlord coming to a resolve or resolution to avoid any type of legal proceedings? 

Former Landlord directed matters to their attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX who on or about XX/XX/XXXX delivered written notification citing " Please be advised that my client has no intention to settle this matter with you because my client did nothing wrong '' ; then proceeded to cite in belief, their client, but my former landlord [ XXXX  XXXX at XXXX XXXX ] had every right to pursue eviction action, then on top of this action? 

Former Landlord with their representing attorney added in a touch of intimidation and threat by citing " If you pursue legal action against our client, we will take all legal action necessary to recover from you all damages, costs and attorney 's fees incurred with defending XXXX at XXXX [ formally known as ] Smoketree Apartments ; as it turn out to be to what I felt were of a threat by Former Landlord ; actually, it were of no threat. 

Before I could act on taking civil legal action against Former Landlord ; on or bout XX/XX/XXXX Former Landlord fraudulently submitted me to collection agency of XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX for amount of {$3300.00} for reasons I could not gather and could not understand at this time. 

H ) Efforts Resolving Fraudulent Debt Collection Action : Prior to taking any civil legal action against Former Landlord ; on or about XX/XX/XXXX I moved to gain understanding for resolve from Former Landlord and their representing attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ; but instead of Former Landlord and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX co-operating for resolve, I received written notification from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX who cited in bold print " Please Be Advised That This Communication is From A Debt Collector ''. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX [ as a self-representing entity ] I moved to file a claim in small claims court in manner to prove Former Landlord breached lease agreement and to recover for damages incurred to my personal property and personal belongings. 

In midst of filing a claim at small claims judicial I notified collection agency XXXX. XXXX XXXX , XXXX. to gain understanding to a XX/XX/XXXX debt action. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX ; XXXX. XXXX XXXX , XXXX. returned reply stating balance owed {$0.00} dollars stating account been received in error ; but to my firm belief, account was not received in error, Former Landlord made a retaliatory but a fraudulent move to have fraudulently submitted me to XXXX. XXXX XXXX , XXXX, but I had no solidified proof to prove my suspicion during this time to prove Fraud in its entirety. 

I ) Abuse of Legal Justice System to Commit & Carry out Fraud Already discussed under " Section E '' of Former Landlord and his Co-Conspirers filed a wrongful eviction action in small claims judicial courts ; in lieu of attached " Complaint Eviction Action, if pay close attention, the " Complaint Eviction Action '' illustrates that ; Former Landlord, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX stood to gain profits up to {$8900.00} dollars from their served up negligence and fraudulent misconduct if I had not made dispute against their fraudulent claim that led to being wrongfully evicted. 

So of course? 

Hereafter I filed and served my XX/XX/XXXX small claims complaint in essence to recover property damage and to prove Former Landlord was the party to have breached the lease ; instead of Former Landlord to have come to a small claims court case resolve?

Former Landlord hired XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to intentionally dismiss my small claims court case which came dismissed on or about XX/XX/XXXX ; and just like XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX delivered in their XX/XX/XXXX written communication ; to have cited ... 

" If you pursue legal action against our client, we will take all legal action necessary to recover from you all damages, costs and attorney 's fees incurred with defending XXXX at XXXX [ formally known as ] XXXX XXXX, and so they did, but yet, in manner for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to have gained judgment ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX perjured under oath to maintain their fraudulent scheme and claim to fraudulent collect on a debt by making a false claim whence alleged .... 

Plaintiff, without Defendant 's permission or release, surrendered possession of keys and apartment on XX/XX/XXXX. In doing so, Plaintiff willfully and intentionally breached rental agreement to which he was a party. 

By XX/XX/XXXX legal costs and fees incurred of attorney fees at {$4000.00} and costs in amount of {$190.00} as interest accrued at rate of ( 4.25 % ) for losing my small claims court case against Former Landlord.

Actions of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX appear to have had all legal rights to recover legal fees and costs for representing their client of XXXX XXXX at XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX judgment for legal fees and costs did not follow in accordance with small claims judicial practices ; but rather, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX intentionally moved my small claims court matters to the justice of peace to be dismissed in manner [ as being alleged ] to prevent their Fraud from being exposed, as once again to the mentioning, in that if, I had appeared in court to testify? 

Any judge to have resided over my testimony and evidence would have immediately seen Former Landlord, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX filed a false allegation against me. 

J ) Pure Fraud by Fraudulent Debt Collecting Action ( s ) : Instead of Former Landlord leaving matters as they may from XX/XX/XXXX that XXXX. XXXX XXXX , XXXX received account from XXXX at XXXX regarding unit # XXXX in error and account balance at {$0.00} ; Former Landlord submitted me to yet another collection agency of U.S. Collections West, Inc. for amount of {$3400.00}. 

Action taken by Former Landlord through their counsel XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX was nothing more than ongoing retaliatory misconduct accompanied with Pure Fraud. 

Hereafter XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX committed perjury under oath claiming I willfully walked away from my lease agreement obligations ; and that of, Former Landlord to have submitted me to U.S. Collection West , Inc. for amount of {$3400.00} after matters had resolved with XXXX. XXXX XXXX , XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX. 

Former Landlord gave no other alternative but for me to pursue matters at division of Superior Court of XXXX County for resolve to help determine to whom breached the lease. 

K ) Superior Court Civil Legal Action Had to Be Taken : On or about XX/XX/XXXX [ still a self-representing entity ] I filed a Breach of Contract claim with Superior Court Clerk of XXXX County citing contributory negligence that involved Former Landlord, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX in manner for judicial courts to determine what party or parties breached lease agreement, violated Arizona Landlord Tenant Act, and for Fraudulent misconduct. 

Former Landlord and XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX hired XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to represent against my Superior Court Case ; during Superior Court proceedings, on a number of occasions Former Landlord and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. had ample opportunities to make resolve prior to judge delivering verdict. 

My Superior Court Claim was filed in Superior Courts on or about XX/XX/XXXX and should have reached and/or come concluded [ approximately ] no later than year end of XX/XX/XXXX ; but instead of Former Land and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX resolving all matters through their counsel XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX while under jurisdiction of Superior Court. 

Accompanied by actions of Superior Courts of XXXX County who failed to uphold Ariz. R. Civ . P. Rule 1 Scope and Purpose that established rules that govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in Superior Court of Arizona ; they should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and parties to secure just, speedy, and in expensive determination of every action and proceedings. 

Former Landlord, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX failed to uphold Ariz. R. Civ . P. Rule 1 Scope and Purpose whence intentionally delayed trial by performing all types of " bad faith '' litigation tactics rather than to have made resolve no later than XX/XX/XXXX. 

L ) Additional Fraudulent Discoveries : While XXXX XXXX XXXX performed " bad faith '' litigation actions during Superior Court proceedings ; a sum of about four ( 4 ) years expired from date dispute initially onset that on or about XX/XX/XXXX while under oath of Superior Courts of XXXX County? 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and company delivered under Ariz. R. Civ . P. 26.1 their Disclosure Statement that's of information XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX expected to present into trial as exhibits and/or as evidence upon whence a trial date would get set. 

Inclusive with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and company 's disclosure of information was ... 

1 ) A copy of a document entitled " Statement of Unit Condition '' that came as part of the lease agreement ; that this lease agreement, was delivered as a falsified document with my signature being forged. 
2 ) Inclusive with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and company 's disclosure of information was the Residential Ledger from XXXX XXXX XXXX with drummed up Fraudulent Charges that totaled {$650.00}. 
3 ) Inclusive with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and company 's disclosure of information was the XXXX XXXX XXXX Bill from XXXX at XXXX with drummed up fraudulent charges of {$740.00}. 
4 ) and Inclusive with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and company 's disclosure of information was ... 
a copy of the Move out Statement with drummed up fraudulent charges of {$3400.00} I'd seen from on or about XX/XX/XXXX. 

Because of my discovery to additional drummed up fraudulent charges ; because of my discovery to finding my signature fraudulently had been forged to a falsified document ; and discovering that, my identity had been compromised by my name being forged. 

While under oath of Superior Courts of XXXX County? 

Ariz. R. Civ . P. 26 ( g ) provided me the legal right to conduct a " discovery '' investigation via Personal Consultation with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ; on or about XX/XX/XXXX I delivered written personal consultation to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX addressing my discovery concerns but gained no response nor cooperation from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

In manner having to prove to courts during trial proceedings my signature had been forged to the lease agreement contract [ document of ] Statement Unit Condition. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX I hired a handwriting analysis expert to examine the document in question with my forged signature ; results returned, my signature indeed had been forged thus confirming I had not authored the document that came into question thus confirming someone stole my identity by forging my signature. 

M ) Reservation Agreement for Holding Former Rental Unit # XXXX : Prior to Former Landlord, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX committing prohibited retaliatory misconduct that led up to being wrongfully evicted ; on or about XX/XX/XXXX I visited XXXX at XXXX XXXX  formerly known as XXXX XXXX XXXX ; it was verbally addressed if interested to renting an apartment I must pay {$50.00} dollars security to hold or reserve a unit. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX I paid amount {$50.00} dollars as security deposit to secure a rental unit for leasing. 

It's standard procedure in manner if there is an occurred error needed to be remedied, standard error correcting procedure is to simply draw a single line through error and make proper correction, and bring to attention of person who made and/or created error if not present ; but if present, error correcting should be done while person is presently available. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX I visited Management office of Former Landlord to follow up regarding leasing a unit ; on this day of XX/XX/XXXX, I was introduced to the Reservation Agreement Certificate, the Reservation Agreement Certificate substantiates XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX reserved rental unit # XXXX for my leasing pleasures but immediately noted upon being addressed about the lease agreement, the leasing term was incorrect. 

Former Landlord 's Management reserved rental unit # XXXX for a 12 month term ; but yet, I never addressed Former Landlord 's Management I desired a 12 month lease ; I only desired a 6 month lease agreement term ; Former Landlord 's Management who bore initials " SB '' properly drew a single line through error and made proper changes to meet my desired rental-leasing agreement pleasures of a 6 month term. 

On this day of XX/XX/XXXX while being addressed by Former Landlord 's Management regarding move-in costs of pro-rated rent ; it was addressed, amount owed was {$190.00} ; but yet, never a discussion about a Non-refundable Administrative fee of {$120.00} dollars needed to be paid. 

N ) Former Landlord & XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Committed Theft By Fraud of {$50.00} Dollars : When delivered money order of {$50.00} dollars on XX/XX/XXXX that represented reserving rental unit for leasing ; while my presence was known, Former Landlord failed to make any kind of error correction to my submitted payment of {$50.00} dollars as a security deposit to hold a rental unit ; here fore, on this day of XX/XX/XXXX, Former Landlord accepted payment as a security deposit for holding a rental unit. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX when visited Management office of Former Landlord to follow up regarding a leased unit being on hold ; on this day of XX/XX/XXXX, while my presence was known, Former Landlord failed to make any kind of error correction to my submitted payment of {$50.00} dollars as a security deposit ; here fore, on this day of XX/XX/XXXX, Former Landlord accepted payment as a security deposit for holding a rental unit. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX when visited office of Former Landlord to sign lease agreement ; on this day of XX/XX/XXXX, while my presence was known during lease agreement signing, Former Landlord failed to make any kind of error correction to my submitted payment of {$50.00} dollars as a security deposit ; here fore, on this day of XX/XX/XXXX, Former Landlord accepted payment as a security deposit as to have held a rental unit for leasing that took effect on XX/XX/XXXX, which means? 

If payment of {$50.00} dollars had other means of use other than for " Security Deposit '' to reserve a unit for leasing ; Former Landlord was responsible to have made proper error correction while my presence was known and available to him on XX/XX/XXXX, but Former Landlord failed to bring any error correcting needs to my attention. 

Because Former Landlord accepted payment of {$50.00} dollars in manner to hold an apartment unit to be leased as leasing terms would commence on XX/XX/XXXX ; holding and reserving an apartment unit for lease can be construed as a " Security Deposit '' where such term of " Security Deposit '' applies within the Rental Agreement.

According to Rental Agreement having to pay a Security Deposit to hold, reserve, or secure a rental unit for lease was clearly termed as N/A ; so mere fact, is that, Former Landlord fraudulently took my {$50.00} dollars without applying it for it's intended delivered purpose, then failed to return my {$50.00} dollars payment, is nothing but FRAUD by keeping and maintaining profits gained by negligence, but FRAUD did not conclude at this juncture. 

O ) Fraudulent Rental Agreement : A Non-refundable Administrative fee of {$120.00} dollars appears to Rental Agreement but appears in manner as a need for separate payment that would strictly define a Non-Refundable Administrative fee for {$120.00} dollars as same would apply for expenditure of pro-rated rent being of a separate payment for {$110.00} in manner pro-rated rent is strictly defined within the rental agreement as payment for pro-rated rent. 

The Reservation Agreement Certificate states move-in costs at {$240.00} that was never signed by me ; on or about XX/XX/XXXX I paid move-in costs of {$50.00} dollars as security so a rental could be reserved on hold for leasing ; then on or about XX/XX/XXXX I paid amount of {$190.00} for move-in costs as pro-rated rent which summed to be {$240.00} for a total move-in to commence on XX/XX/XXXX. 

According to Rental Agreement a Non-Refundable Fee amounts to {$120.00} dollars plus {$2.00} for tax that totals {$120.00} for a Non-Refundable Administrative fee. 

On page 2 of 24 of Rental Agreement sub-topic of Administrative Fee states Owner hereby acknowledges receipt from Resident ( s ) of a non-refundable Administrative fee in amount of {$120.00} which shall immediately be used by Owner to help defray the administrative costs associated with preparing the lease paperwork ; as stated prior, this action of Non Refundable Administrative Fee deserved it's own separate payment for strictly being defined as payment for Non Refundable Administrative Fees but I never directly paid amount of {$120.00} for Administrative Fees. 

Payment given was {$50.00} dollars for reserving a unit and {$190.00} for pro-rated rent ; but yet, according to Rental Agreement, pro-rated rent in amount of {$110.00} was due on XX/XX/XXXX to cover period from XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX, but yet? 

Former Landlord accepted payment of {$190.00} on or about XX/XX/XXXX ; which actually, and by Rental Agreement Terms is five ( 5 ) days prior to XX/XX/XXXX ; so facts are, pro-rated rent of {$110.00} dollars was due on XX/XX/XXXX which is same date lease agreement were to take and effect and actually took but fraud did not conclude at this juncture ... spacing is limited.