Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1962-07-17

III WIlaC sense was my state
ment inexact.
KHRUSHCHEV: Baruch
could not demand the destruc-
ton of all bombs, when we did
not have bombs and the other
countries did not have them
either. Baruch had a differ
ent idea. He wanted to achieve
control over atomic energy and
sources of atomic raw materials
under the u. N. aegis. In point
of fact. the U. N. proposal did
not envisage an atomic Weap-
onS ban. but was designed to
give the United States a domi-
mating position in the produc-
ton and use of atomic energy.
The Baruch plan was con-
cerned not with bombs but with
making it impossible for other
countries to use atomic energy.
Documents Available
There are documents on all
these questions and they are
obtainable at our foreign min
iStry.
STONE: l need no reference
from the foreign ministry be-
cause l attended the Baruch
plan talks.
Barucn suggested to abolish
American bombs and to ban
the production of nuclear weap-
ons. He suggested that the
entire development of atomic
energy be put under U. N.
control. including the trans
fer to the U. N. Of all plants
fashionable ma
terials, the transfer to the U. N.
of all available Information
scientific and technical re
lating to atomic energy.
KHRUSHCHEV: Well, this
is nearer to the truth. But this
exactly constitutes encroach-
ment by America on the posi-
bility for all countries to de-
velop the use Of atomic energy.
What would it have meant to
put the development of atomic
energy under U. N. control?
That would have meant to put
it under control of the United
States. inasmuch as the U. NJ,
in point of fact, is a branch
of the United States Depart
ment of State. The U. N. does
not yet constitute United Ma
tons in the full sense of the
word. In the future the U. N.
will really become United Ma
tions, but so far it falls far
short of such functions: 1t is
dominated by certain groups of
Western nations, with the USA
at the head. But that period
is already running out for the
U. N. and will soon end.
Agriculture Cooperation
LAUREN SOTH editor of
Des Moines Register Tribune):
Seven years have passed since
contacts were started between
Iowan farmers and Soviet agrl-
cultural experts. Do you think
that these contacts are useful
and should be developed? To be
brief. are there grounds for
cooperation between our ma
tons in the fields of agricul-
ture?
KHRUSHCHEV: In our coun-
try we are satisfied with this
cooperation. Many farmers,
agricultural experts from the
United States had come to the
Soviet Union, and delegations
1f Soviet agricultural special
lists went to the United States.
We are pleased with the re-
suits of these trips and are
to continue develop
ng such contacts.
You will ask, what then in
;ereSts us most in American"
1t is organization of farm
production. In this field you
lave a great experience well
worthy of being studied. For
Instance. we have borrowed
our experience in the organ
of corn seed farming: |,
We have bought plants in your
ountry, rapidly learned to run
hem, and they are operating
Effectively.
The organization of agricul-
ural work in the United States |
much better than in the So
let Union. You have a better
ange of machinery, especially
or stock farming. This is why {
he United States for the time