Evening star., 1960-03-13

When the Court Of Appeal of Department received
said appeals IT pronounced sentence under date of
February 29 1860 the appeal filed against
sentence of the Second Penal Chamber of the Court
of the National District dated February 2 1860 by
tue of which CHANGED THE INTERPRETATION
GIVEN TO THE FACTS by the Judge the lower
Court, and acting contrary too the
appellants DR. RAFAEL FRANCISCO BONNELLY
BATTLE DR. JOSE ANTONIO FERNANDEZ CAMI
NERO and their accomphces, those complete
shown the sentence referred You accused of
having plotted with foreigners excite the citizens
considerable number to arm themselves against the legally
constituted authorities. vehicles explosives and
pements with the Intentional aim of disturbing the public
peace the order Of the State by virtue of Penal
Code articles of the Law No 4s3 dated Aprl s.
1893 compiled and prepared the National Congress Of
the Republic Said accused and appellants against the
sentence which condemned them 80 of nard labor
sentenced FIFTEEN (l5l years Of tabor by
making of the principle of oncumulaon Of penalties
and based N clause Of t6s of the Penal Code
BS the of the Gour, Of Appeal the
RAFAEL EMILIO GONZALEZ PIMENTAL. HUGO
CESAR QUEZADA ALMANZAR Y LISANDRO AN
TONIC MACARRULLA pronounced guilty Of the
ot forming single groups Of three persons order
to excite the citizens themselves against the legally
constituted authorities commit hostile against the
Government and disturb the public the order
Of the State These appellants condemned
TEN lO of hard labor making Of the principle
of -cumuation Of penaties based clause Of
a6S ot the Penal Code
Ano with regard to LOSE MIGUEL LEYBA PEREZ
AD0LFO ALEXANDRA FRANCO BRITO and their
accomplees they pronounced guilty of the crime
provided for articles 81 80 of the Penal Code and
condemnedt TO FIVE i5l years Of imprisonment
With regard appeals filed oy the accused whose
figure the sentences of the First Penal Chamber
of the Lower Court of the National District dated Febru
AIRY 8, 1860 said Court of Appeal by its sentence of
March 1860 which likewise contained the records
changed the Interpretation given the facts the Judges
of the Lower Court which led them impose 80 years
sentence hard labor against the appellants question
modifying the sentence against which appeal made,
and acting by its authority the
ROLANDO ANTISTENES ALVAREZ ABREu (a) Ell
HURON. DR. ALFREDO PARA BEATO and accom-.
plices GUILTY OF CRIMES against the legally consti.
uted authorities holding meetings and using explosive
implements with the deliberate aim of disturbing the public
peace and the order of the State: making of the
principle of non-cumulahon of penalties condemned
them TEN (l0) years hard labor The decision of
the Court Of Appeals found the accused JOSE ANTONIO
HURTADO PAULINE (aI DANTON. VINICIO RAFAEL
GRISANT ISIDOR and their accomplices guilty of the
crime Of exciting the citizens against the legally
constituted authorities in order disturb the public peace
and making of the principle of non-cumuation Of
sentences and based art 46S Of the Penal Code it
condemned them to FIVE t5' years of hard labor
Furthermore said second degree found
cused CESAR LEOPOLDO DE LOS SANTOS AL
MONTE. RAFAEL OCTAVIO SILVERIO MESSON
tal PELLITO accompces guilty of the crime pro-
vded 70, ~ 80 of the Penal Code because
Of their having plotted themselves against the
legally constituted authority and condemned them TWO
~ years of imprisonment
And finally SAID cleared the accused RAFAEL
ANTONIO BAEZ PEREZ Ia CUCHUCHO PINDARO
BOBEA PRANDv DIEGO CASANOVAS GARRIDO
JOSE CADET MENA ARCADIO ENCARNACION
PALMER FRANCISCO ANTONIO SALDANA ME-
DRANO Ga, TONO Lie RAFAEL ALBUQUERQUE
ZAYAS BAZAN ta) CHICHI, CARLOS SULLY BON.
NELLY VALVERDE, RAMON CACERES TRONCOSO
LUIS BELTRAN PEREZ ESPINOZO and their ao-
complces
Only deep Humanitarian mteres, coud have led the
judges Of the Court Of Appeal revoke the
appealed anc gran, considerable reduction Of the
penalties imposed the accused by the Judges Of the
The Iudicla the inherent prin
cple of liberty and independence of the judicial its
The present Trujilo What immense difference
there between the democratic life of the Dominican people
this the hdrroOmg agony Whch the Cuba Of
Fde Castro aud the Venezuela Betnmcourf are suffer
ing where justice trampeed by the
dictatorship that imposes will republics
where the continuously pronounce sen