The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1960-09-01

ol StdlS rtOutc lSo. 10, SSiu point DelnS
0.73 mile, more or less, measured
Southerly along existing State Route
No. 78. from the intersection of State
Route No. 78, and the. southwesterly
eadWe thence ns northeasteriy n as aes slons
the. existing route and through the
Village of Caldwell to point in the
center of State Route No. 78. said
point being 0:lo mile, more or less,
No. 78. from the junction of State
Route No. 78 and State Route No.
564, and being in all a distance of
2.2l miles. more or less.
SECOND PROPOSED
ABANDONMENT:
Being more fully described as fol-
Situated in Section 25, in Center
Township. Town North Range 9
Beginning at point in the center
of State Route No. 78, said point
being OILS mile, more or less, measured
nnsortheasterlg nc along State Route No.
1S.rdI 7S: from Bridge No NoB-7s-ll56;
State Route No. IS for a distance
of OPT mile, more or less, to a point
in the center of State Route No. 78.
said point being O.42 mile. more or
State Route No. rs, from Bridge No.
NOB-78-1l56.
THIRD PROPOSED
ABANDONMENT:
Being more fully described as fol-
lows:
Situated in Section 80. in Center
West.
Beginning at a point in the center
OF State Route No. 78, said point being
easterly along State Route No. rs from
the, junction of State Route No rs
and County Road No. 1888; thence
IN an easterly direction along State
Of State Route No % IS, said d point n being Being
O.29 mile. more or less, measured
easterly along State Route No 49,
from the junction of State Route No
78. and County Road No 1873. Being
less.
FOURTH PROPOSED
ABANDONMENT:
Being more fully described as fol-
:, Situated in Section 90 in Center
Township, Town North, Range
Beginning at a point in the center
o5O mile, more or less, measured
easterly along State Route No. rs, from
the junction of State Route No 78 and
Township Road No. l42; thence easter
junction of State Route No. rs, and
Township Road No. 142; thence east
erly along State Route No. rs to a
point in the center of State Route No
70, said point being O.6l mile, more or
less. measured along State Route No
70, from the junction of State Route
No; 70 and Township Road No. I42
and being in all distance of OIL
mile, more or less.
FIFTH PROPOSED
ABANDONMENT:
Being more fully described as fol-
- Situated in Section 27 in Stock
Township, Town North, Range s
Beginning at a point in the center
OBS mile. more or less. measured vest
erly along State Route No. 70. from
Bridge No. NOB-78-1647; thence in an
easterly direction along. State Route
State Route No. rs. said point being
vi mile. more or less, measured
easterly along State Route No. Is.
from Bridge No. NOB-78-l647, and
oelng In all distance of 0.36 mile,
s1oNS 9SAS q eHAP4ER M4ER 55Ii Hhf Of rFGH1; PHE
OHIO REVISED CODE ARE MET
fHE MP JopRNAL oPRN pe2PFR 81 FRE THTFG DREGr6R n
Of HIGHWAYS. THE VAcATioN OF 81
PORTIONS OF EXISTING STATE
ROUTE NO. 78. SITUATED IN SEC
llONS t. ). AND In OLIVE TOWN.
| SHIP, TOWN 6 NORTH, RANGE 9
WEST. AND IN SECTIONS IS. SO.
A6ID,, AMP Is H,SIE IN GENTER TOWNSHIP.
AND IN SECTIONS 80. 20, AND 2s
IN CENTER TOWNSHIP, TOWN :
| NORTH. RANGE VEST, AND IN
SECTION 27 IN SToCK TOWNSHIP,
| TOWN NORTH, RANGE 8 WEST.
| IN NOBLE COUNTY. OHIO, SAME
TO REVERT TO THE ABUTTING
| PROPERTY OWNERS AT SUCH TIME
THAT THE DIRECTOR HAS COM
Piled WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 55ll.07, OF THE REVISED
And being more fully described as
| follows:
Being all of existing State Route
No. rs. not described for abandon
| ment between the beginning and end
of the above described proposed re-
location, not needed for the con-
struction and maintenance of the
| above proposed relocation or needed
| for any other public highway.
E. S. PRESTON,
| Director of Highways