Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1959-01-29
Legal Advertisement
G. II. SANDERS
Solicitor
100 Commerce Lane
ROcIxViIIa. Md

c. r.. SANDERS
Solicitor
100 Commerce Lane
Rockville, Md.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY
MARYLAND
Sitting as a Court of Equity
No. 2l6S2 Equity
DART o. IRWIN
9405 Byeforde Road
kensington, Md.
Plaintiff
VS..
EMILY R. IRWIN
9405 Byeforde Road
Kensngton. Md
Defendant
ORDER OF PUBLICATION
The object Of the Bill of Complaint in
the above entitled cause is to procure a
divorce mensa ct thoro by the plaintiff
from the defendant. and to have the
custody and guardianship of the infant
children of the parties awarded to the
plaintiff pendente lite and permanently.
The Bill recites that the plaintiff is an
adult and has been resident of Mont
eomery County. Maryland for more than
one year Immediately preceding the filing
OF the Bill and that the defendant is an
adult who resided in Montgomery County,
Maryland. until she departed from the
State OF Maryland on the 5th day of
January. 1859: that the narties were law
fully married at Annanolis. MARYLAND m
the 9th day Of June. 1943: that two chill
eren. Barry Irwin. 13 years of age. and
James Irwin. 9 years Of age were horn
OF said marriage; that although the plain
tff has always conducted himself toward
the defendant as a faithful and affec
Tomato husband the defendant became
infatuated with a third party residing in
the State Of Ohio. and has EXPRESSED 10
the plaintiff an intention to terminate the
marriage: that on the Sth dav NJ Sentern-
Der. 1858, the defendant deserted tho Main
tiff and thereafter refused In cohahii or
live with the plaintiff as husband a1d
wife; that from said date until the 5th
day of January 1859 tho rarfias resided
at 94O5 Byeforde Road RensinPton. Mont
gomery County. Marvla1d and that during
the period the defendant refused to cohahit
with the plaintiff as husband and wife:
that notwithstanding an agreenert between
the parties that custody of the infant
children would he in the plaintiff the
defendant. on the 5th day Of January
1859. left the residence of the parties
accompanied nv the infant children. with
out the knowledge or consent Of the plain
tiff and proceeded to the State of Ohio:
that the plaintiff is a III and proper per
son to have the care and custody of the
said children. and is able to care for and
raise them in proner surroundings for their
test interests and welfare, and that il is
not in the best interests and welfare Of
the said children to remain in the State
OF Ohio under the circumstances. away
from their accustomed environment and
from the love and eompanionship Of the
plaintiff.
1T is THEREUPON ORDERED. this 9Th
day of January. 1859 by the Circuit Court
for Montgomery County. Maryland. sitting
as a Court Of Equity. that the plaintiff
shall. by causing a COPY of this Order to
be inserted in some newspaper published
In Montgomery County, Maryland. once a
week in each of four successive weeks he
fore the 9th dav of February 1883. give
notice TO the said absent defendant of the
object and substance OF this Bill of Com
plant warning her 10 appear in this
cause and to file her initial pleading here
IN on or before the 18th day of March
1859. and to show cause If any she may
have why a Decree should not be passed
as prayed, or. in the alternative. by caus-
ing a copy Of this Order 10 be personally
served on said absent defendant on or
before one month prior to the said 18th
day CT March. 1859.
CLAYTON K WATKINS
Clerk Of the Circuit Court
For Montgomery County. Md.
True Copy Test:
Clerk at 1863 2-5