Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1959-02-05
G. X. SANDERS
Solicitor
100 Commerce Lane
RnairpftIa Nh

Rockville, Md.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY
MARYLAND
Sitting as a Court Of Equity
No 2i682 Equity
DART o. IRWIN
y4U5 Byeforde Road
kensington, Nd.
Plaintiff
VS..
EMILY r. IRWIN
9405 Byeforde Road
Kensington, Md.
Defendant
ORDER OF PUBLICATION
The object of the Bill Of Complaint ir
the above entitled cause is to procure q
divorce mensa ct thoro by the plaintiff
from the defendant, and TO have the
custody and guardianship of the infant
children of the parties awarded to the
plaintiff pendente lite and permanently
The Bill recites that the plaintiff is ar
adult and has been resident of Mont
gomery County, Maryland, for more than
one year Immediately preceding the filing
of the Bill, and that the defendant is an
adult who resided in Montgomery County
Maryland, until she departed from the
State of Maryland on the 5th day OF
january. 1853; that the parties were law
fully married at Annapolis, Maryland, on
the 9Th day of June, 1913; that two chill
dren, Barry Irwin, Is years of age, and
OF said marriage; that although the plain
tiff has always conducted himself toward
the defendant as a faithful and affec-
Tomato husband, the defendant became
infatuated with third party residing In
the State OF Ohio, and has expressed tC
the plaintiff an intention to terminate the
marriage; that on the 9Th day of Septem-
Der, 1888, the defendant deserted the plain
tiff and thereafter refused to cohabt OF
live with the plaintiff as husband and
wife; that from said date until the 5th
day of January, 1853, the parties resided
at 9105 Byeforde Road, Kensington, Mont
gomery County, Maryland. and that during
the period the defendant refused to cohabit
with the plaintiff as husband and wife;
that Notwithstanding an agreement between
the parties that custody of the infant
children would be in the plaintiff, the
defendant, on the 5th day of January,
1883, left the residence of the parties,
accompanied by the infant children, with
out the knowledge or consent of the plain
tiff, and proceeded to the State of Ohio;
that the plaintiff is a fit and proper per-
son to have the care and custody of the
said children, and is able to care for and
raise them In proper surroundings for their
best interests and welfare, and that 1t is
not in the best interests and welfare OF
the said children to remain in the State
OF Ohio under the circumstances, away
from their accustomed environment and
from the love and companonship of the
plaintiff.
IT is THEREuPoN ORDERED. this sth
day of January, 1888, by the Circuit Court
Tor Montgomery County, Maryland, sitting
as a Court OF Equity, that the plaintiff
shall, by causing n copy OF this Order to
ne inserted In some newspaper published
IN Montgomery County. Maryland, once a
week IN each Of four successive weeks be-
fore the Jth day OF February, 1883. give
nctce TO the said absent defendant of the
object and substance of this Bin OF Com
plant. warning her 10 appear IN tins
cause and 10 lille her initial pleading here
~ on or before the 18th day of March,
1882 and to show cause, II any she may
have, why a Decree should not be passed
as prayed, or, in the alternative, by caus-
ing a copy of this Order TO be personally
served on said absent defendant on or
before enc month prior to the said 18th
lay Of March, 1859.
CLAYTON X. WATKINS
Clerk of the Circuit Court
For Montgomery County, Md.
True Copy--Test:
CLAYTON X. WATKINS
Clerk 4t-4659-2- rs