davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31
Caldwell United Presbyterian
Church

William McIntire, supply pastor
Church school, $50 a. m.
Church Worship Service, 1890
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31
Caldwell First Methodist Churc

E. Parker West, pastor
Church school, $50 a. m.
Worship service, 1870 a. m.
Holy Communion.
Meditation Tempered Chris
tianS."
Junior Hi will meet at 500
p. m. Senior Hi at $50 o'clock.
Evening worship at 7 o'clock.
Sermon I'VE Three Kings"
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31
Mt. Tabor Methodist Church
Milford r. Carey, Pastor

Worship service, 900 a! m.
Church school at 1915 a. m
Clarence Spence, supt.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31
Ava Free Methodist Church

Leroy Hiett, Pastor
Church school, $50 a. m.
Worship service, 1920 a. m.
Evening service, 7:3G p. m.
Prayer meeting Thursda
evening, 1880 p. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31
Ogle's Ridge Church

j. T. Barnes, pastor
\ Church school, 1000 a. m.
Worship service, HOO a. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31

New Harmony Baptist Church
Leslie Koskovics, Pastor
Church school, $50 a. m.
Worship service, 1920 a. m
Evening service, 7:30 p. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31
Barry'S Ridge Church

J. T. Barnes, Pastor
Church school, 200 p. m.
Worship service, 800 p. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31

SarahSVIIIe Free MethOdlSt
Church
Paul E. Neville, pastor
Worship service, $3.50 a. m.
Church school, 1920 a. m.
Youth service, Thursday, T.;
p. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31
Mt. Ephraim Methodist Church

Wilbur Cash, pastor
Church school, 1000 a. m.
Worship service, 11:00 a. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31

SummerfIeId BlbIe MISSIONARY
Church
Church school, $50 a. m.
Testimony service, 1920 a. m
Evening evangelistic service a
7:30 p. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31
st. Mary's Church (Fulda)

St. NldTyS CHuTcn (FulQa)
FIR. j. j. Donaldson, pastor
Sunday masses, 7::30 a. m. and
$50 a. m.
Confession Saturday, 1870 p. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31
Perry0pOlis Free Methodist
Church

Paul E. Neville, pastor
Church school, 1000 a. m.
Worship service, 10:45 a. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31

Summerfield Free Methodist
Church
Paul E. Neville, pastor
Church school, 200 a. m.
Worship service, 2::45 p. m.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31

Church of Christ on Main Street
Church school, 9:45 a. m.
Worship service, 1890 a. m.
Evening service, 1880 o'clock.
The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1959-12-31

Common Pleas Court
The State of Ohio Noble County.
Case No. 9799
The Farmers and Merchants Bank,
Plaintiff
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12
MonyAreoF Families Checked

side interviews on key routes of
the region.
Highway officials turned this
data over to the Transportation
Survey experts, who made their
own projections for 1880.
Mileage to Triple
Among the many estimates
were these:
/. The total miles Of travel
in the Washington area be-
tween 1855 and 1880 will triple,
owing largely to the greater
distances in the suburbs. The
median trip length in 1880 will
be AZ miles, against only 2.3
miles in 1855.
2. The number of person
trips will double, from 81 mil
lion a day to about 81 million.
3. Travel to the central bust
ness district of Washington will
increase rs per cent Cfrom IL
million to is million trips
daily. and peak-hour trips
downtown will increase 10 per
cent, mainly because of a IL per
cent increase anticipated in
downtown employment.
1. About one-sixth Of all 1880
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

Interviews we're made at one
out of every 10 homes in the
Washington suburbs to get ira
vel data on which to base the
huge 1880 area transportation
survey.
The travel data, rejecting to-
days residential. employment
and shopping distribution, was
used to project 1880 travel ha-
bits, based on what regional
planners think the 1880 lesi-
Dental and employment diStri-
button will be.
Most Of the study data was
collected in 1855 by highway
officials in Maryland, Virginia
and the District. The same
group had made a study in
1913, and the purpose OF the
new data was to bring the
1948 study up to date.
In addition to the home
checks, one out of every 10 Dis
trict taxi drivers Zone of every
five in Maryland and Virginia)
were checked about all trips on
a given day; drivers Of one. Of
every 10 trucks registered in the
area were checked, and mo-
florists were questioned in road
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

trips in the area will be made
by trucks.
Curbs Envisioned
While the $2.4 billion trans
portation system is geared to
meet 1880 demands, the report
said that some drastic trafflc
restrictions still might be re-
uuired because of the huge traf-
fic volumes on the way. One
such step, it said, is that VOL
umes of traffic may actually
have to be restricted" on free
ways to keep it from jamming.
Presumably this would be done
by closing of access ramps to
the freeway at certain points
and at certain times of day.
The traffic estimates, pro-
jected by the consultant firm
of Wilbur Smith & Associates
of New Haven, were made by
dividing the entire metro
area into a number of small
districts, and then figuring
the travel from each district to
every other district. This same
kind Of study now is being run
by area highway officials to get
their own projections Of 1880
traff1c, using a different tech
nique. Survey officials hope the
two findings will not be sig
nif1cantly different.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12
Congress Urged to Form Corporation
As Initial Regional Transit Group

highway funds that they will
not have any to spare for
transit.
Anticipating opposition, the
report said Maryland and Vir-
ginia should not fear any
encroachment of Federal power
on State or local rights. 1t
added:
I'm its proper context, a
public corporation is neither a
novel nor an irresponsible
arrangement. It does not escape
judicial purview, and thus can
not infringe upon the constitu-
tional authority Of any State or
local government"
While the corporation officers
would be appointed by the
President. the group could also
be RESPONSIVE to local needs
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

and interests" the report said.
One way the report suggested
was formation of an advisory
board made up of local area
governing officials.
The main reason for speed in
the organizational setup, the
report stressed, is to get the
complex subway and express
bus facilities planned and built.
The report said express bus
service should be started on all
radial freeways las they are
completed, starting in the early
1865"
Work should start on the sub
ways by 1865. the report said,
and rail service should be
inaugurated no later than 1870
because the express bus system
will have reached its capacity
on several routes by that time"
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

total increase taking place
elsewhere.
Precise location of the in
creaseS are shown on the 1880
map. along with areas (such as
the Potomac River where in
tensive new residential devel-
opment is discouraged.
The plan also proposes "a
number of new urban commu-
mites insulated by rural lands
from other urban development,
each with a measure of indie
'pendence, each focused upon
one or more new outlying con-
centrations of employment, but
all integrated into the metro
Ipolitan whole by circulation
arteries and shared services"
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

10 OPEN SPACES-"Open
space" areas where the plan
proposes that high-density de-
velopment should be discour-
aged are shown on the map.
For recreational purposes,
the plan proposes acquisition
of at least 10000 acres 100
square miles, all over the area
for regional parks" - which
would remain as close to their
natural state as possible.
In addition to regional parks.
the map shows a number OF
green wedges" and green
belts" between concentrated
development which are in
tended for agriculture, for pre-
lection Of the water supply, for
airports, for industrial sites and
for other uses. AS well, the plan
suggests low-density residences
with building lots several
acres in size - might be pre-
served In such wedges" and
belts"
Such proposals, the plan said,
will be subject to strong eco
nomic pressures. To succeed,
the report said, they probably
need, beyond zoning, the with
holding of utilities and high
way accessibility" and meas
ures Of taxation which will en-
courage the maintenance Of
existing rural conditions and
discourage dense development.
Plan Not Mandatory
The portion Of the Trans
portation Report dealing with
the regional plan" was pre-
pared by q staff headed by
John T. Howard, planning
consultant and professor Of
city planning at the MasSa-
chusetts Institute Of Technol-
ogy.
1t noted that the report deals
with conditions as of both 1866
and 1880. Factors determining
growth up to 1865, it said, are
largely in control now and
little can be done to change
them substantially. But deci.
sions still can be made as tc
1880, the report said-if the
area is willing to agree upon
them.
These decisions" the report
concluded, will be guided
either by no policy or by unco-
ordinated policies or by 9
single set of co-ordinated poll.
cies as to regional planning. Il
there are no planning policies
or If the policies are unco.
ordinated, the resulting pattern
Of development will almost Ger.
tainly be costly, wasteful, IN.
eficient, inconvenient and un.
pleasant to look at and II
ave in"
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

which we're used to draw up the
plan for 1880 follow:
0 POPULATION-From a re-
gional population Of l.8 mil
lion in 1855 and about 2 nil
lion today, the study predicts
an increase to about "a mil
lion in 1865 and to 3 million
by 1880.
. FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT
= The $4,000 Federal en-
ployes in the National Capital
Area are expected to increase
to about $4,000 in 1856 and
to $4,000 by 1880, the report
says, with almost all the net
increase occurring in the sub
urbS.
Within the District, Federal
employment is expected to be
almost stable, increasing from
1876, 1000 in 1855 to 211.000 in
1880. Actually. the report pre-
dicted, it will decline to about
1877, 900 by 1865 with the move
of the Central Intelligence
Agency and other agencies to
the suburbs. But it predicted
a recovery with about $4,000
new employees being added in
the East Mall area between
Capitol Hill and the Anacostia
River by 1880.
0 CENTRAL BUSINESS DIS
TRICT-Downtown Washing
tons central business district
always will retain its massive
pre-eminence as the largest
concentration" of both Federal
and non-Federal employment
and economic activities, the
report said. In total employees,
the central area is expected
to jump from $4,000 in 1855
to $4,000 in 1865 and to 355.
900 by l980-a total increase
of about 10000 over the next
two decades.
This is highly important in
terms of transportation since it
means there will be no dispersal
of employment and, conse-
quently. an ever = increasing
need for better rush hour
transit and highway facilities to
the central core from all parts
of the region.
0 BUSINESS WITH
For the region as a whole a ire
mendouS increase is anticipated
lin non-Federal employment,
jumping from $4,000 in 1855 to.
about 480, 900 in 1880. Virtually
all of this increase is antici-
pated in the suburbs. Among
the three fasteSt-growing coun-
ties, Montgomery is expected to
double nom Federal employment
by 1880, Prince Georges to tri-
pile and Fairfax to quadruple.
INDUS TRY Industrial
employment is expected to al
most double by 1880 in the re-
gion, increasing from 94,500
employees to about 10000. AS
with other employment, the
greatest part of the total is ex-
pected to remain within the
District, but almost all of the
net increase during the next 20
years will take place outside.
The greatest increase, the re-
port predicted, will be a tenfold
boost in industrial employment
in the Fairfax County Falls
Church area.
. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP
MENT-Just a few years ago
more than twice as many peo-
pie lived in Washington as in
the suburbs. Now, the numbers
are about equal. BY 1880, the
study estimates, two-thirds of
the 3 million Washington area
residents will live outside the
central city. The District, Ar
lington and Alexandria are ex-
pected to be developed about |
to capacity by 1880 or before, !
with about two-thirds of the
a, npAaAR.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

Probably the most controver-
sial question involved in the
Mass Transportation Survey
was the kind of regional po-
litical organization that would
be recommended to develop the
area-wide transportation sys-
TEN.
During many discussions on
the subject, strong sentiment
was expressed in favor Of some
form Of interstate agency that
would be set up by compact
between Maryland. Virginia and
the District. These express
Sions came mainly from State
officials, who resisted any idea
Of Federal control.
Two Steps Outlined
The final report, however,
contends that Congress should
take these two organizational
steps Immediately in order to
get the program started:
/. Sign the interstate COM
pact, already agreed to by Vir-
ginia and Maryland, to form an
area-wide commission with
powers to regulate routes and
rates of public transit.
2. Form a Federal corpora
ton" which would have au-
thority to plan, build and OPP
crate q modern regional transit
system, review area highway
plans and help highway ON
Gals overcome deficits in funds
they need.
The report conceded that a
powerful interstate agency
with powers to raise and spend
taxes-would be preferable to
the Federal corporation. And
it said that such a powerful
interstate group should be Or
ganized as soon as possible to
take over functions Of both the
corporation and the separate
regulatory commission.
Years to Form
There are so many OBJ
stacles" in the way Of the in
terstate group, however, that
its formation will be "a lengthy
and complex business" per-
haps taking several years, the
report said.
SO it proposed the Federal
corporation as "a useful device
for carrying out the first steps
until an interstate pro-
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

METRO WASHINGTON shows detail the regional
believe urban growth will spread the National Capital
region by 1880 Notice that most outlying still retain relatively
low residential land dnses to units acre. but that urban
development this has filled the
suburban landscape The prominent include the north
northwest of the extending well beyond Wheaton Gathers
and into the Potomac Maryland and beyond Fairfax and
Vienna Virginia The highway shown because
the roads dividing lines for different kinds land
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

1t be attractive, pleasant, heal
thy, or will some Of today's
new subdivisions already be
slums by 1880?
At first glance, these ques-
tions bear no relation to trans
portation. Actually, they con-
stitute the basis on which
Washington's new $500 mil
lion Mass Transportation Sur
vey was conducted.
AS their first step, planners
and transportation experts
drew up a general develop
ment plan" which assumes
what the National Capital re-
gion will look like 81 years
from now.
The plan consists OF Two
parts. The first is map tac-
companying this article) that
shows where new development
is expected to take place and
the kind of use to which all the
land in the area is expected
to be put. The second part is
q text and long series of sta
tistical tables which explain
the map.
Rapid Changes
Why is all this so important
to transportation? The answer
is that the transportation syS-
TEN is designed to meet the
areas living needs Of 1880. If
we were dealing only with to-
days needs, we wouldn't need
a plan, because we know where
today's population concentra-
tions are and the travel pattern
which results. But the metro
polls is changing so fast it
would be like working in the
dark to lay out a highway
system without some plan for
the future.
So the role of the plan, first
of all, was to figure out how
many people there will be in
1880, where they will live,
where they will work and where
they will shop. Once that was
done, estimates of the numbers
and locations of actual trips
these people will want to take
was figured on huge automatic
computers. And from this traf-
f1c data, the final job was to
lay out details of the proposed
$2.5 billion highway-transit
system which would be ade-
quate to handle all this traf-
fic.
Now it's true, of course, that
highways themselves determine
to a large degree where new
growth will take place. If you
build a beautiful new freeway,
you can be sure that developers
will build new homes near it.
But too many of these homes,
grouped too close together. can
overcrowd the best freeway and
wreck it's effectiveness. You
need only look at the Shirley
highway to know this is true.
So a plan is desirable to show
people when this kind of a dan
ger point is reached.
Where Not to Build
An equally important reason
for having a plan, however, is
to show where not to build
highways-in places where the
community wants to discourage
intensive residential develop
ment. One such place is along
the Potomac River. where the
water supply must be protected
from sewer drainage. Others
are areas which should be re-
served for parks. agriculture,
airports, industry and other
uses.
At the same time, the plan
proposes that most residents Of
the area be within a Commute
travel time Of downtown Wash
ington on the recommended
transportation system.
The major considerations
NATIONAL CAPT
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12
Metro Growth to Million Is Key to Traffic Problem
1880 7 ronsit Proposals
See Drastic Changes

What will the Washington area look like in 1880?
How many people will it have, and where will they
live, work and shop? How will the area grow-wi it
continue to sprawl outward from the city, or will there
be number of satellite towns scattered in the sub
urbS? Finally what kind of place will it be to live? Will
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12

prietary agency can be estab-
lished by compact"
Aside from general comments
on the Federal corporations
role in developing plans, designs
and construction of the transit
system, the report did not &c
into greaSS detail, presumably
assuming that these matters
would be gone into at length
when the question Of Federal
legislation comes up on Capitol
Hill.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1959-07-12
States Protected

The report did say that the
corporation should be financed,
however, with loans or con-
tributions from the Federal
Treasury" 1t said localities are
having such a tough time with
Evening star., 1959-12-15
4 Redskins
Named to
East Squad
Los ANGELES, Dec. is (AP)

LOS ANGELES, Dec. is (AP)
Seven members of the cham
pion New York Giants we're
named today on the 32-man
Eastern Division all-star squad
that will meet the pick of the
1 Western Division in the an
nual Pro Bowl game here jan
uary II.
Selected by the six coaches
in the Eastern Division, the
squad included four members
of the Washington Redskins
Center Jim Schrader, End Bill
Anderson, Defensive Tackle
Bob Toneff and Fullback Don
BosSeler.
The quarterbackS chosen
we're two veterans who won
their greatest fame with West
ern clubs before being traded
to Eastern Division teams
Norm Van Brocklin of the
Philadelphia Eagles and Bobby
Layne of the Pittsburgh Steel
erS. Van Brocklin formerly
starred for the Los Angeles
Rams and Layne was kingpin
of the Detroit Lions.
The Western Division team
will be named later.
East Coach Buck Shaw OF
Philadelphia will get one bonus
player selection. The team now
Offense
Ends--Bill Anderson, Red
skins; Bob Schneider, Giants;
Jimmy Orr, Pittsburgh Steel
ers.
Tackles - Roosevelt Brown
Giants; Ken Panfil, Chicago
Cardinals; Lou Groza, Cleve-
land Browns.
| Guards - Jim Ray Smith
Browns; John Nisby, Steelers
Centers-Jim Schrader, Red
i. skins; Art Hunter, Browns.
,Quarterbacks- Norm Var
Brocklin, Eagles; Bobby Layne
Steelers.
Halfbacks - Frank Clifford
Giants; Tommy Mcdonald, Bill,
Barnes, Eagles; John Grow
Cardinals.
Fullbacks - Jim Brown
Browns; Don Bosseler, Red
skins.
Defense
Ends-Ernie Stautner, Steel
erS: Bob Gain, Browns; Andy
Rebustelli, Giants.
TackleS-Bob Toneff, Red
skins; Frank Fuller, Cardinals;
Jess Richardson, Eagles.
LinebackerS - Sam Huff
Giants; Walt Michaels, Browns
John Roger. Steelers.
Halfbacks - Dean Derby
Steelers; Tommy Brookshier
Eagles; Lindon Grow, Giants.
SafetieS-Jim Patton, Giants,
Jerry Norton. Cardinals.
Evening star., 1959-12-15
ATCHISON'S
ANGLE
By LEWIS +. ATcHISoN

If the return of the Redskins
tar-fung alumni for the first
annual reunion did nothing
else, it guaranteed a full win
ter's supply of laughs for the
local chapter. 1t was not only
good seeing them, but better
listening to them cut up old
touches.
Nine out of 10 stories involved
the pixyiSh Erny Pinckert, who
seemed to be a ringleader in
the fun-making, and Wee Willie
Wilkin was recalling one Incl
dent in particular concerning
Erny.
He clobbered a big tackle
playing opposite me from the
blind side" Willie related, land
the guy thought 1 was respon-
sible and was trying to get even
with me. I was explaining to
him how I couldn't possibly
have been involved when Erny
trotted by and said, Alta boy,
Willie, hit him again."
= =
Pinckert was kidding about
the Redskins present status and
blaming it on the clubs seri-
business.
They tell me-" he began,
tongue in cheek, that the
coach makes the boys work all
the time-meeting in the morn
ing, practice in the afternoon
and sometimes a meeting at
night. How in the world does
he expect to have a winner that
way? That doesn't leave any
time for socializing. When ]
was here we didn't take it quite
as seriously. and look at the
teams we had"
The sight of Pinckert, or
mere mention of his name, re-
calls the night a couple of the
boys got together in his hotel
room for glass Of beer. There
came a knock on the door. pre-
sumably the bellhop with six
cold ones, and Erny, busy tell
ing a story, only partially
opened it and thrust out a $40
bill.
"That'll be SIS more" an
nounced the colder voice of
Coach Ray Flaherty. THE fine
is $25."
So
1t wasn't a big year for the
Redskins in the won-and-lost
column, but it was their big
Evening star., 1959-12-15

gest at the box office, accord
ing to George Marshall, club
owner.
And we had our biggest
payroll in history" he added.
Speaking of player salaries.
the Redskins boss noted that
the Los Angeles Rams an d
Detroit Lions, who supposedly
pay the fanciest figures of any
teams in the National Football
League, finished last and next
to last, respectively, in the
Western Division.
1T only proves that money
isn't the answer to the problem
Of getting a winner" he COM
mented. you've got to find the
right men fer the right spots. A"
Marshall believes, and right
ly so, that if the Redskins ever
get a team capable of winning
seven games and staying in the
title race most of the season
the fans will tear the stadium
apart" Maybe we'd better get
the new stadium built before
that happens.
Austin Gunsel. acting COM
missioner, may not feel that
protests about the officiating
in the Redskins games this
year came strictly from dis
gruntled club officials and
biased followers of the team,
but from the fans themselves
after reading a two-page,
single-spaced letter from one
of them.
Preferring to remain anony-
nous 1--WE have the name), the
writer says:
The Redskins have a good
team. They have an excellent
coach in Mike Nixon. I'm sure
they neither need nor want
extra breaks or favors. Just
give them a fair count and
they'll win their share of
games. If the Redskins, or
any other team in the league,
is to lose an above average
number of games, let's be able
to blame it on the. club and not
poor officiating. The Redskins
lost far too many games this
year, but anyone who has been
following them closely cannot
help but wonder how many of
those losses would have been
wins were it not for bad deci-
sions on the part of the men
in the striped shirts"