Minneapolis spokesman., 1958-06-27

Day ~ an editorial titled ~Goy
ernof Faubus Wins asked this I
question:
shall mob actions In The |
streets outside . school or c9n
tiuued hafaaameuts inside . athool
bs allowed. pnreprenaed and an
febuked 70 cancel ont decision
II our highest court - this Wfaf
the people of tbo gato o. Ark
ausaa Or any other state North
or South. really want DO they De-
sire a minority ruler We don't be
liege 10. For. II This we're possible
iu the present Instance, wfst
would be lcft, in any debatsbio
nsld u the whole fabric Of our
constitutional law7"
The Pulitzer prize winning daily
AHflANBAs GAZETTE had this
10 say lob1ngly about GOV Pau
tas. Monday en- ils editorial page
in a apoech 10 the WV at ligt
Springs Governor Faubus paid
tribute 10 Negro fighting anita of
World War II and declared that
tbera are those In this land wbg
seek 10 create dlsacnsi0n between
myself ana The Negro raeef Yes
and ho hopes they All vote far
him. tao
The CLEV ND pLAGs
DEALER commented on ~ eiiior
ihl page
The deelai0n Of District judge
Harry Leu,ley 10 delay school
Indignation until 1861 90 LITTLE
Raek appears 70 b. a way 70
AVOID further riollng and blood
shed after the 1861 target date u
could be called a good decision
though many Negroes and many
white peraons IN the North viii
rhafe ~ the delay
Many sogrsgationlsts ln the
South have also hailed Judge Tom
icya order, nH II Il viudicatcd their
perpetual opposition 90 school ia
tegfa,ioH II did nothing ~ the
kind. ~ course
III they take this aa major
victory, ihey must realize deep
down IN their hearts that they
are fighting losing battle. for
two and halt years "a such a
program Of social evolution Is bat
short time it - already more
than three years since the original
.U & supreme Court deseErega
tipa decteea"
Tbr HOBToH HERALD took
issue with Judge frmleys reason
ing and said
-rhc Little Rock Judge who u
obviously sincere places great
stress on the maintenance of siu
cntlpaal standards fhat u = pub
u, interest he poiuls out lust
~ the maintenance ~ equality
and Justice ia No one can dcry
IL Yet one might reasonably
suppose that the Supreme Court
had thought uf Il also Clearly the
tuNh Court was aware that thsfc
wuild DO atvases and strains IN
sffactlnR school intcEratlon Must
IL not have weighed the risk of
temporary upsets IN school al
minlatiation against long term
gain or equality ~ treatment 20
an regardless Of race and color
ilaa q not IN effect already Do.
olded that educational standards
IN The long run VIII bo higher Tor
thla aaiutary reform
Tho TOLEDO HiApE IN an edi.
tnual ti,icd New law In littls
Rock 2" states
rnior fhr new law
which prevails in Latte Rock,
Governor Fnubua would be no.
holding the court and President
lEissnhcwor wauti be asfying tho
court II They reaartrd 20 their
last years actions sgals
And whom iaw "a law at aoe
time ard not smother az oHc
place and not another thcro should
be less tslk hereafter about the
supremacy ~ the law lr intcsra.
tiou matters apd u,orc rannitlera.
tlon given to choosing the time
and place where progress can be
made without the uao az tedefA
| ttuope
| The sT LOUIS pOar, ,pis-
lrArCu states editorally
rho fundamental question
ls what will he gained by twc and
hAit years ~ dciay
"rhs Indignation issue must b.
faced IN Iattle Rock and clswbcre.
| Would the same struggle to up.
hold the law ~ the land have 10
be fought an over again vs. 1891,
N W wx~ E E~