St. Paul recorder. [volume] (St. Paul, Minn.) 1934-2000, 1957-03-15

4 ABAlt AADAAlNk AAllAllAnIl aAAyA At-
clares lOw-rcnt housing programs
must reflect equitable provisions
for eligible families Of all races de-
tcrmined on the approximate vol
ume and urgency Of their respec-
tce needs"
New York, ". Y, April 1851:
state commissioner Of housing
rules that, for the purposes Of the
housing law segregation is dis
elimination.
New York, ". Y, June 1851:
Federal Housing Administration
announces that all projects to
which FILA obtains title will be
administered on a nonsegregated
basis.
San Francisco, Calf, January,
1854; Housing authority includes
nonsegregation clause in con-
tract for operation Of four tenn
porary housing projects.
Albany, ~ Y, october 1855:
Governor appoints new housing
advisory council to aid State com
mission against discrimination in
administering laws barring bias in
PUBLICLY assisted housing.
Hartford, Conn, December 1858:
State commission on civil rights
rules real-estate agents are cover
ed by state law barring discrimin-
alton in services offered TO public.
Hartford, Conn, June 1855
state commission on civil rights
orders private housing develop
ment receiving city tax abatement
TO end discrimination against Ne
gro applicants.
Legislation
United States Of America, 1949-
So: Connecticut, Massachusetts,
New Jersey, New York, Pennsyl-
vania and Wisconsin forbid dis
elimination and segregation in
public housing.
United States OF America, 1919
80: Los Angeles and San Francis
co, Calf, and Cincinnati, Ohio bar
discrimination and segregation in
urban redevelopment,
United States Of America, 1919
50: Ordinances in San Francisco,
Calf; Hartford, Conn; Boston,
Mass. New York N. Y; Cleveland
and Toledo, Ohio; Philadelphia. Pa.
and Providence, r. /. bar dis
elimination and segregation in
public housing,
United States OF America, 1949-
80: Legislatures in Connecticut,
New York, and Pennsylvania for
bid rectal and religious discrimin-
alton in publicly assisted housing
New York ~ Y, March 1851:
Ordinance bars discrimination in
publicly assisted housing
Madison. Wis, June 1851: Leg
islature repeats State law recog-
MIXING validity OF racial restrictive
covenants.
St Paul, MINI, April 1858: Leg
/ islature prohibits race restric-
tons in real estate contracts.
Denver, Colo, September 1883;
city council bars approval and
recording OF subdivisions contain
ing racial restrictive covenants.
New York, N. Y, July 1854: Or
dinance makes II Illegal for owners
Of multiple dwellings, erected with
loans or guarantees from public
agencies, to discriminate against
tenants because Of race, creed,
color or national origin.
Albany N. Y. Io55-56: Legisla-
ture outlaws discrimination In vlr-
tually an housing 70 be built with
| Government insurance u955p :
| gives jurisdiction TO state COM
mission against discrimination
| l956).
Trenton, n j. July 1865: Lcgis-
lature bars discrimination in
| granting Of mortgage loans.
Court Action
Washington, May. 19iS. United
States Supreme Court lShclIy V.
| Graemcr, Hurd v. Hodges rules
that courts cannot enforce racial
restrictive" covenants. Five years
later July 1881, Court rules that
courts may not award damages for
breach OF racial restrictive cove
nRnt tBarrows v. Jacllson).
| Birmingham, Ala, December.
1880; United States Court OF APP
peals holds that city racial ION
ing low is unconstitutional
| Chicago. M, June 1888. state
| circuit court bars condemnation
Of land owned by Negro, thwart-
ing attempt to drive his family
from neighborhood by turning pro-
Pcrty into a public park.
| U.SA. July, 1883. Federal dis.
trict courts in Evansville, Ind and
/ Toledo, Ohio, enjoin local housing
KeeeEzT HAVE oO&l