The journal. (Caldwell, Ohio) 1934-1961, 1957-07-25
LEGAL NOTICE
STATE OF OHIO
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS


NOTICE OF HEARING
Contract Sales Legal Copy No. 57-447
Columbus, Ohio, July IL, 1857
In accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 55l1 of the Revised Code of
Ohio, the Acting Director of Highways
1890 O'Clock A M, Eastern Standard
Time. on August g. 1857 in the Com
missioners Office, The Noble County
Court House in Caldwell Ohio for the
purpose of hearing arguments for and
against the proposed Relocation and
vacation OF part OF State Route No 7S
and State Route No. 260, Section 1896,
1924, Noble County Ohio.
PROPOSED. WHEN THE PROVISIONS
OF CHAPTER 55l1 OF THE OHIO RE
VISED CODE ARE MET AND UPON
PROPER ENTRY IN THE JOURNAL
OF TIL DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS,
The TIL eTbI5 FELoGAT4QE noTIE or OF 4 PoRTIoN
1695, SITUATED IN SECTION 35
STOCK TOWNSHIP, NOBLE COUNTY
OHIO.
And being more fully described as
follows:
Beginning al a point in the center
line of existing State Route No 49,
said point being 0.33 mile more or less
westerly from the present intersection
of State Route No 70 with State Route
No. $50 thence in an easterly and
northeasterly direction to a point in
the centerline Of existing State Route
No. 70, said point being O.07 mile, more
or less, northedSterly from said exist
ing intersection and there terminate.
and being in all q distance of 0 10 mile
more or less.
PROPOSED. WHEN THE PROVISIONS
OF CHAPTER SSH OF THE OHIO RE
VISED CODE ARE MET AND UPON
PROPER ENTRY IN THE JOURNAL
OF THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS.
THE RETURN OF A PORTION OF
EXISTING STATE ROUTE No. 78
SITUATED IN SECTION 35 STOCK
TOWNSHIP. NOBLE COUNTY. OHIO,
TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY
OWNERS AT SUCH A TIME THAT
TION OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED
PROPOSED RELOCATION is AC-
CEPTED AND OPENED TO TRAFFIC.
And being more fully described as
follows:
Beginning at a point in the center
line of existing State Route No 70.
said point being 0.33 mile, more or less.
westerly from the existing intersection
Of State Route No 78 with State Route
No. 260 thence in an easterlv and
northeasterly direction along said
existing centerline TO a point 007 mile.
more or less, northeaSterlY from the
existing intersection OF State Route No
l0 with State Route No. 260 and there
terminate, and being ali that portion
of existing State Route No. 70 not
needed for the construction and main
tenance OF the above described pro-
posed relocation OF needed for any
other public highway.
PROPOSED. WHEN THE PROVISIONS
OF CHAPTER 55l1 OF THE OHIO RE
VISED CODE ARE MET AND UPON
PROPER ENTRY IN THE JOURNAL.
OF THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS,
The RELOCATION OF a PORTION
OF STATE ROUTE No. 260. SECTION
1i.24, SITUATED IN SECTION 35
STOCK TOWNSHIP, NOBLE COUNTY.
OHIO.
And being more fully described as
follows.
Beginning at a point in the center
lne OF existing State Route No 26n
said point being 10 feet northwesterk
from the northerly end of bridge No
-260-lf23, thence northwcsteriy
crossing existing State Route No rs
at point 0.03 mile more or less. north
cfly trom the existing intersection OF
State Route No $50 and State Route
NO. 70. thence continuing in north
westerly direction To d new interscc-
tion OF Proposed State Route No 260
With Proposed State Route No 10 at
point 0,0l mile, more or less. north
westerly from existing State Route No
rs and there terminate, and being in
- 9 hl'o'hllNt VI O,lb iilIlt' ultI OF less
PROPOSED, WHEN THE PROVISIONS
OF CHAPTER SSH OF THE OHIO RE-
VISED CODE ARE MET AND UPON
PROPER ENTRY IN THE JOURNAL
OF THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS,
THE RETURN OF A PORTION OF Ex-
listing STATE ROUTE No 260. STU
ATED IN SECTION IS, STOCK TOWN
SHIP. NOBLE COUNTY, OHIO, TO
THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWN
ERS AT SUCH A TINE THAT THE
CORRESPONDING NEW SECTION or
THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROPOS-
ED RELOCATION IS ACCEPTED AND
OPENED TO TRAFFIC
And being more fully described as
follows.
Beginning at point III the CENTER
line of existing State Route No $50,
said point being 10 feet northwesterlv
from the northerly end OF Bridge No
NOB-2oO- ll23: thence in a northwest
erly and westerly direction along
existing State Route No 260 to its ex-
lSting intersection with existing State
Route No. 10 and there terminate. and
being all that portion Of existing State
Route No. 260 not needed for the con-
structlon and maintenance OF the above
described proposed relocation or need
ed for any other public highway
GEORGE J. THORNYER
Acting Director of Highways