Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1957-01-24
Legal Advertisement

Slruct electric power ana energy
transmission lines upon, across
and over a certain tract of land
which is owned by Defendants
William Jeweler and Mary T.
Jeweler, his wife as tenants by
the entirety; that said tract of
land is situate in the Eleventh
(Barnesville) Election District OF
Montgomery County; and that for
the purposes aforesaid it is neces.
sary for the Petitioner to acquire
in fee simple, from said tract of
land, a strip of land two hundred
fifty (250) feet wide, which strip
of land is hereinafter more par
ticularly described, on which to
construct, operate and maintain
its electric transmission facilities
such as towers, poles, structures,
wires, cables and conduits, toge-
Their with the right of access to,
and egress from, said strip of
land and the right to cut certain
trees and brush on adjacent lands
owned by said Defendants, all as
hereinafter more particularly set
forth; that said tract of land so
owned by Defendants William
Jeweler and Mary T. Jeweler, his
wife, as tenants by the entirety,
was acquired by them by a deed
dated September 6, 1855 made to
them by a certain r. Edwin
Brown, which deed was, On o.
tober 6, 1855, duly recorded
among the Land Records for said
Montgomery County in Liber 2121
at Folio 1872; that Defendant The
Equitable Life Assurance Society
of the United States is the owner
of a mortgage on said tract so
owned by Defendants William
Jeweler and Mary T. Jeweler,
which mortgage is dated January
IL, 1949,was recorded on January
81, 1949 among the Land Records
of said County in Liber 1924 at
Folio 122, and originally secured
the principal sum of $33,000.00;
that Defendants William Jeweler
and Stanley J. Jeweler are the
owners Of a mortgage on said
tract so owned by Defendants
William Jeweler and Mary T.
Jeweler, which mortgage is dated
March 6, 1858, was recorded on
March 9, 1853 among the Land
Records of said County in Liber
1859 at Folio 593, and originally
secured the principal sum of $685.
10000; that Defendants Montgom-
cry County, Maryland, and The
State of Maryland are joined
herein in order that they may
protect any claim for unpaid
taxes against. the other Defend
ants herein which may constitute
a lien against the land, part of
which is the subject of these con-
demnation proceedings; that the
a bove named defendants are
joined in these proceedings in ac-
cordance with Section / of Arti-
Gle 33A of The Annotated Code
of the Public General Laws of
Maryland and, insofar as the Pc
titioner has been able to ascer-
tain, are all the parties and the
spouseS of parties that have or
may claim to have an interest in
or to the property herein sought
to be condemned; that the Peti-
toner is unable to make an agree
ment with the Defendant owners
of said property for the purchase
by the Petitioner of said strip of
land, notwithstanding, the fact
that the Petitioner has made a
reasonable and bona fide effort
so to do, and that, therefore, it is
necessary that said strip of land,
and the Defendants interest
therein, be acquired by condern-
nation; that the Petitioner desires
to acquire by condemnation, as
aforesaid the fee simple title to
the strip of land two hundred
fifty (250) feet wide for the con-
struction, operation and mainte-
nance thereon of Petitioners said
electric transmission facilities, to-
gether with ID the right of in
gress to and egress from said
strip of land at all times, using
as far as practicable existing
roads and (ii) the right, from
time to time, to cut down, trim,
remove and keep cut all trees
and brush upon the land owned
by Defendants William Jeweler
and/or Mary T. Jeweler adjoin-
ing the said strip of land, which
might, in the sole and exclusive
judgment of the Petitioner, at any
time interfere with, or be liable
to interfere with, or fall upon,
any towers, poles, structures,
wires, cables, conduits or other
improvements which the Petition
er, or its, successors or assigns,
may at any time or times con.
sruct or maintain upon, over or
under said strip of land; provided,
however, that there shall be re-
served to Defendants William
Jeweler and Mary t. Jeweler,