Minneapolis spokesman. [volume] (Minneapolis, Minn.) 1934-2000, 1957-03-15

must reflect equitable provisions
for eligible families Of all races de.
terrnined on the approximate vol
ume and urgency Of their respec.
tice needs"
New York, ~ Y. April 1851
State commiAsioner of housing
rules that, for the purposes OF the
housing law. segregation Ii dis.
elimination.
New York. ~ ", June 1851
Federal Housing Administration
announces that all projects "a
which FILA obtains title will be-
administered on n nonsegregated
basis.
San Francisco, Calf. January
1854: Housing authority includes
nonsegreRation clause in con-
tract for operation OF four TEN.
porary housing projects.
Albany. ~ r., October 1855:
Governor appoints new housing
advisory council 10 aid State com.
mission against discrimination In
administering laws barring bias In
publicly assisted housing.
Hartford. Conn. December 1858:
State commission on civil rights
rules real-estate agents are cover
cd by state law barring discrimin.
alton In services offered 10 public.
Hartford. Conn, June 1850:
state commission on civil rights
orders private housing develop
ment receiving city tax abatement
to end discrimination against Me-
gro applicants.
Legislation
United States Of America, 1949-
So: Connecticut. Massachusetts,
New Jersey, New York, Pennsyi-
vania and Wisconsin forbid dis
elimination and segregation In
public housing.
United States OF America, 1912
81: Los Angeles and San Francis
co, Calf, and Cincinnati. Ohio bar
discrimination and segregation In
urban redevelopment
United States Of America, 1912
So: Ordinances In San Francisco,
Calf; Hartford, Conn; Boston.
Mass. New York. N. Y: Cleveland
and Toledo. Ohio: Philadelphia. Pa.
and Providence, X. I. bar dis
elimination and segregation In
public housing.
United States OF America. l949-
81: Legislatures In Connecticut.
New York. and Pennsylvania for
bid rectal and religious discrimin-
alton In publicly assisted housing.
New York, NJ Y. March 1861:
Ordinance bars discrimination In
publicly assisted housing
Madison, Wis, June 1851: Leg
islature repeats state law recog-
MIXING validity OF racial restrictive
covenants.
st, Paul. MINI, April 1853: Leg
Lsiature prohibits race restric-
lions In real estate contracts.
Denver, Colo. September 1853:
city council bars approval and
recording Of subdivisions contain
ing racial restrictive covenants.
New York. N. Y, July 1884: Or
dInance makes II illegal for owners
of multiple dwellings. erected with
loans or guarantees from public
agencies, 10 discriminate against
tenants because OF race. creed.
color or national origin
Albany. ~. Y, l955-56: Leglsia-
turc outlaws discrimination In vir-
tually all housing 10 be built with
Government insurance 1885,.
gives jurisdiction To state COM
mission against discrimination
ti95sl.
Trenton. n J.. July 1858 Iegis-
lature bars discrimination In
granting OF mortgage loans.
Court Action
Washington. May 1913. United
states Supreme Cour, (shelly v.
Graemer Hurd v, Hodgesl rules
that courts cannot enforce racial
restrictive covenants Five years
later July 1881. Court rules that
courts may not award damages for
breach Of racial restrictive cove.
nant tBarrows v. Jacksonl.
Birmingham, Ala. December.
1850; United states Court Of Ap-
peals holds that city racial ron
ing low IL unconstitutional
Chicago, IN. June 1855 state
circuit court bars condemnation
OF land owned by Negro. thwart-
ing attempt TO drive hts family
from neighborhood by turning pro-
perty into public park.
USA. July. 1883: Federal tls-
tr,c, courts In Evansville, Ind and
Toledo, Ohio, enjoin local holsing
ssssEEz,I,; t I A, MOV1 |