The Republican. [volume] (Oakland, Md.) 1877-current, 1956-04-12
LAW OFFICES OF
Horace P. WhitWorth, Jr.
Westernport, Maryland
ORDER OF PUBLICATION
Harry 6. Fazenbaker and Sarah
Fa2enbaker, his wife, Western
port Maryland, Plaintiffs

larry 6. Fazenbaker and Sarah
Fa2enbaker, his wife, Western
port, Maryland. Plaintiffs
VS..
carl Fa2enbaker and Louise Fazen-
baker. his wife, DOnora. PennSyl-
vania: Margaret f. Turley and
James NJ. Turley. her husband,
WellsbWg. West Virginia; Anna
Flora Dolan and Oscar p. Dolan,
her husband, Cumberland, Mary
land; Frank f. Fazenbaker and
Mildred c. Fazenbaker, his wife
Hagerstown, Maryland Eta
Grace Abbott and William Abb
bolt, her husband, Homecoming.
Maryland: Bertha NJ. Sears and
Howard j Sears. her husband,
Westernport, Maryland; Raymond
j. Fazenbaker and Dorothy Faz-
enbaker, his wife. Donora, Penn
sylvania: Cecil Lee Fazenbaker
and Pansie Fazenbaker. his wife,
Deer Greek. Illinois; Jennie
Friend. wi dow, Friendsville,
Maryland: Eva Duckworth, wild
ow. Elkridge, Maryland: Mar
garet Hoffman and John Hoff-
man. her husband, Uniontown,
Pennsylvania. Gladys Litman and
Sol Litman, her husband. Union
town, Pennsylvania; Josephine
Englehart, widow, MeyerSdale,
Pennsylvania: Mary B. Savage
and Martin L. Savage, her huS-
band. Sang Run, Maryland; j
Frank Browning and Mary
Browning, his wife. Sang Run
Maryland: Edward NJ Browning
and Ruby Browning, his wife
Uniontown, Pennsylvania; Harry
s. Browning and Elinor Brown
ing, his wife. Uniontown. Penn
sylvania: Bryan N. Browning and
Sylvia Browning, his wife, Pres
colt, Arizona: Helen ChippauA
and Bailey ChippauX, her hus-
band, West LeiseWing, PennSyl-
vania; Marlin Browning and Iris
Browning, his wife, Spartans-
burg, South Carolina; Lorraine
Dassance and Richard Dassance
her husband, Masontown, Penn
sylvania: Josephine Wayne anC
Douglas F. Wayne, her husband
Detroit, Michigan; Edward r
Browning and Joan Browning
his wife, Fairchance, Pennsyl
vania Defendants.
No. 1851 Equity in the Circuit
Court of Garrett County.
State of Maryland.
The object of this suit is to pro
cure Decree for the Partition anC
Sale of one hundred and eighty
five acres of coal and minerals
underlying certain land in Distric
No. in Garrett County. Maryland
which coal and mineral interest be
came vested in the said partie,
hereto as the heirs at law Of Erwin
and Lee FaZenbaker, deceased, late
of Garrett County, Maryland, anC
to distribute said proceeds of sale
among the said parties hereto in ac
cordance with their respective in
tereSts therein.
The Bill states that Lee FaZen
baker and Erwin Fazenbaker be
came the joint owners of certain
coal and minerals underlying one
hundred and eighty-five t185
acres of land situated and located
in District No. in Garrett County
Maryland which is particularly de
scribed in said Bill, and that upor
the death of said Lee and Erwin
Fazenbaker, the said parties here
to Plaintiffs and Defendants az
above stipulated and set forth
whose known addresses are as
above set forth, became the heirs
at law in whom said coal and min,
eral interests are vested by recorC
at the filing of these proceedings
as Tenants in Common. The Goa
and minerals as stated and de
scribed in said Bill were conveyed
unto Jesse F. FaZenbaker, by Nor
man Jacobs, by deed dated April
], 1870, and recorded among the
Land Records of Allegany County
Maryland. in Liber No 30, Folio
708, to which reference is hereby
made for a particular description
by metes and bounds.
The Bill further states that these
coal and mineral interests are not
susceptible to partition in kind anC
that the property should be sole
and the proceeds distributed among
the parties hereto according tC
their respective interests, and thai
certain parties to these proceed
ings as above set forth are Non.
Residents of the State of Mary
land.
1T is THEREUPON, this 9th
day of March; 1856, ordered by the
Circuit Court of Garrett County
Maryland, in Equity, that the
Plaintiffs, by causing a copy oil
this order to be inserted in some
newspaper published in said Gar.
rett County, Maryland, once in each
of four successive weeks before the
9th day of April. 1856. give notice
to the said absent Defendants OF
the object and substance of this
Bill, warning them to appear in this
Court in person or by Solicitor, on
or before the 18th day of May, next
to show cause, if any they have
why a Decree ought not to be
passed as prayed.
RICHARD L. DAVIS, Clerk
True copy,
Test: Richard L. Davis, Clerk.
A DIV XXX