ZajednicÌŒar = Fraternalist. [volume] (Allegheny, Pa.) 1894-current, 1955-01-05

the printing article in the ~" which the President
maintains untrue and second the refusal of the Editor
to delete said Objectionable features of the article upon
quest of the President.
To the first problem, it is the opinion of the Legal
but compliance of the Bylaws and the remedies
afforded by 1t is impossible the Legal Counsellor
ectng the article for to do SO would be classified as
ing without having heard both parties, for to
ADOPT the position OF the obctos would be acceptance
facts of those matters which they ag In the event the
article is untrue and therefore, beous the remedy to
those obectng lies in Section 4S4 which provides for the
institutng of complaint against a member who writes
maliciously of an Official of the Union
To the second proposition, the opinion of the Legal
Counsellor that again there requirement opinion
for the is found in the Bylaws 1t is
positively stated in the Bylaws that the Executive Board
the only body authorized to compel the Editor retract
undesirable articles In the present instance the Executive
Board did not decide Notwithstanding the for not
doing. We submit and possibly by doing so, de-
parting from position of Legal Counsellor that would
have been courtesy for the Editor to suspend printing er
but repeat that the majority vote of the Executive Board
would be necessary to compel retraction.
We again call attention to all concerned that there
Bylaws which specifically both of the above nstan
ces and we would strongly recommend that they be COM
piled with
remind the Editors to adhere to that Section of the By
Laws where specific mention is made of personal attacks
Bro. Grasha Regarding that article signed by
Clarion member in which and the Supreme President
attacked am just trifle puzzled why that member
tons Where am elected National Boards such as Trea
of the Fraernal Youth Counseors Association
Committee Fraternal Congress-
These elections help but reflect credit the
CFU Many of my articles and reports written up by
national and yet ne sees none OF this or hears
nothing of these Various DOCTORS etc. have made tours of
the CFU Headquarters and subsequently write detailed
counts of the building and personnel detailed that is with
the sole exception of noticing the existence of the
Junior Order Department which after ALL comprises only
of the Organization but then Grasha is at the
head of it. Alas these doctors and such only
functions which they attempt to dress political and
clandestine
1 reerate that the affair in question was private
called
its return from visit to the Old Country. The hosts u-
zed the opportunity to tell of their trip and experiences
II there any talk of the Official Organ it's Croaan
Editor it was incidental and done by loyal CFU mem
bers who presume still have the prerogatve of discussing
CFU subject AS pointed before there men
ton of any resolution against anyone repeat my pro-
test agast the Cr1aad D EdGr for permitting the print
Supreme President In defense of his action he states
that since this was written by member he had choice
but print it. That insult intelligence for
know and all know that there have been other, many
other letters from members and resolutions Of
Lodges the Lodge SEAL which ended the waste
basket is evident that when desires to attack
Grasha Manich then and only then shall there be
Bro. Mandch - The Minutes of our meeting of No
veber "a as approved today show that tabled motion
ent of bro Bernard Luketich for of legal opinion
My for wanting legal opinion is this There
time to be filled to do the regular work Not only that
but have contract with the employees union to work
We agreed years that as long the employees will be
able to dispose of the routine work in five days. will not
require them to work saturdays All the work has been
discharged to my satisfaction, and have complaints
from any head of the other departments believe all the
regular work in the Supreme Office is being done during
the regular five day week.
My question to the Legal Counsellor is: Can the
jorty of the Executive Board hire employee when
there vacancy and there need for additional help?
Bro. Balaban The matter of the tabling by bro Man
dich of bro Kraschs motion that clerk be hired at
the Home Office until the Legal Counsellor submits opin
ion as to who may determine the necessity of new
ployee ruled by the Legal Counsellor follows
Section 2O8 of the Bylaws specifically places within
the province of the Executive Board the right to hire all
employees necessary to carry the regular activities in
the Home Office This statement needs ampfcaton for
it is sefexpanatory The very power to hire by the Execu
tive Board implies with the determination of the necessity
for In far the duties of the President out
lined the Bylaws specifically Section 49, the posi-
ton of your Legal Counsellor that said section applies
those who have been hired and that from tme time of
their hiring the Supreme President the employees
in far distribution efficiency and general supervision
is concerned
Bro. Krasich - am fully in agreement with the opin-
ion of Legal Counsellor for it could not very well be
otherwise because Section 208 of Bylaws very plain
am for the time being withdrawing motion pertaining
to the employment of bro. Luketich
Bro. Mandich - At the meeting, tabled
ton by bro Bella seconded by bro Ovcarch pending the
arrival of the Legal Counsellor to the effect that bro Nj
cholas Lpanovich, long time employee in the Supreme
Office be placed pension of December 3d. 1854 My
reason for wanting legal opinion is this We have
Bylaws covering the dischareinp