The guardian. [volume] (Boston, Mass.) 1901-1960, 1955-05-28
Desegregotion

segregation
Continued From Page One
pede legislative programs. One
of the vital Importance was
failure of the US. Senate to
confirm John Marshall Har-
Ian as Associate Justice of
the US. Supreme Court until
challenged to do So A full
stated court was necessary
to implement the desegrega-
ton public school issue. Agen-
da of the us. Supreme Court
was at a standstill because
the Senate judiciary commit
tee did not indicate whether
or not the nomination of
Judge Harlan would be con-
f1rmed.
The above senatorial dicker-
ings was considered legisla-
tive obstruction endangering
public welfare without provo
cation. Judge Harlan's confir-
nation was finally disposed
Of. Public indignation also
had subsidized and the high
tribunal started from where
it left off. The facts of this
celebrated desegregation pub
lie school issue, which have
come to light make it incum-
bent on all racial elements
of the solid south and border
states to be patient and use
good judgment in their deli
berationS.
1t must be considered a sud-
den explosion, which has been
sounded over the whole nation
and world. No matter how
enthusiastic considered first
as positive force, not a ne
gative proposition for a pro-
posal to make descendants of
former generations accept a
decree to uproot traditions of
racial superiority Immediate
ly.
ProtagoniStS Of racial hatred
in the solid south must be
termed immune to their for
fathers unpredicataole inhi-
bitions, which were indoctri-
mated from birth. A gradual
transition for nature to take
its course to right wrongs
in a world of never ending
wonders scientists have only
scratched the surface.
Judicial interpretations
would seem greatly out of
place for any branch of go
vernment to demand sudden
reaction to curb racial hatred
in any category when former
generations have been taught
all men are not equal in the
land which they live. Condo
nation of the above premise
seems preposterous, but a con-
siderate view should prevail
toward a satisfactory solution
to study carefully all phases
of this complex issue in order
that world onlookers will not
misjudge, who is right or
wrong.
SHOULD WHITE SUPREMACY
PREVAIL?
Our nations founding IA
theirs did not anticipate any
inter-racial detectives advanc-
ing toward future interlocking
legislation. 1t was a white
mans Interpretation that only
concern them. All frontiers
were circumsribed on a basis
Of white supremacy in Gull
ture and development, Know
ledge Of emancipation Of black
bondsmen did not concern
them as one of the basic issuer
of government that would con-
front them when the Federal
Constitution was designed.
Thomas jefferson, one its sign
ers noted this grave error, but
Alexander Hamilton, an alleged
racial hater, because Of his
negroid heritage bitterly OPP
posed at that time any docu-
mentary illusions that would
in any manner recognized black
bondsmen as factors Of Equal
Rights. Hamiltons arrogant
views predominated, Historians
never have recorded this base
Hamiltonian theory Of FACIAL
hatred. Aaron Burr, wht hal
lenged and slew Hamilton II.
a duel asserted as one of the
accusations. against his victim
"detestable racial hatred" Gu
founding fathers timidly sub