Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1955-06-09

| 16, 1916, in Liber 1918 at Folio
80; that the said William F.
Easter and Albert B. Easter, took
title to the above described land
by Deed from Benjamin O. Wood
ward and Corrie V. Woodward,
| his wife, by Deed dated July o.,
/ 1910, and recorded January 81,
1871, in Liber 812 at Folio 1871;
that the Complainant, William E..
Smith, conveyed Lots 9 to II, in
elusive, Block 10, Laytonia, to
Kenneth Clyde Marshall, Sr. and
Eliza Nettie Marshall, his wife,
as tenants by the entirety, by
Deed dated August 81, 1851, re-
corded August 20, 1851, in Liber
1866, at Folio STA; that the Com
plainant, William E. Smith, con-
veyed Lots 7 and 8 in Block 10,
TO Charles Lee Runyon and Bar.
bara Irene Runyon, his wife, by
Deed dated September 9, 1852
and recorded in Liber 1904 at
Folio 467; which said land was
thereafter conveyed to Kenneth
William Runyon and Ellanora
Runyon, his wife, by Deed dated
November %, 1858, and recorded
November 80, 1858, in Liber 1864
at Folio 545; that the Complain.
ant, William E. Smith, conveyed
Lots 10 and ID in Block 10, Lay.
tonia, to Kenneth William Run.
yon and Ellanora Runyon, his
wife, by Deed dated November
10, 1858, and recorded November
80, 1858, in Liber 1864 at Folio
544; that the Complainant, viii.
liam E. Smith, conveyed Lots l
to 6, inclusive, and IS to 20, in
elusive, Block 10, to Joseph Ray
mond Keesee and Katherine
Elizabeth Keesee, by Deed dated
August 20, 1854, and recorded
August %, 1854, in Liber 1855
at Folio 284; that doubt has been
expressed as to the validity of
the Complainants' title and none
of your Compliments are able to
insure the title to any of the
property above described, and
therefore, unable to obtain mort.
gage construction loans; that the
Defendant, Benjamin o. Wood
ward, claims an open, notorious,
hostile, continuous and exclusive
possession of all of the above
land until his conveyance to VIII
liam F. Easter and Albert B.
Easter, as joint tenants, aforc-
said, from a conveyance from
Olivia A. Crawford, widow of
Charles c. Crawford, dated APP
ril %, 1927, and recorded May
6, 1927, in Liber 424 at Folio 202;
that it appears from an eXamina-
ton of the title to the land de-
scribed in Paragraph l, herein,
that Blocks 6 and 7 are good and
marketable; that your Complain
ant, William E. Smith, has a tax
title to Lots II to IA, Block 9,
the legal title to which is in J.
Martin Rausch; that the legal
title to Lots l to 10, inclusive,
in Block 9, is in George W.
Marsh; that the legal title to Lots
16 to 20, in Block 9, is in Adolpt
Priester; and the legal title to
Lot IS, Block 9, is in ]. Martin
Rausch; that the Complainant
William E. Smith, has a tax title
to all of Block 10, the legal title
to which is in ]. Martin Rausch;
that the Complainant, William E
Smith, has tax title to all OF
Blocks 10 to %, inclusive, legal
title to which is in George A
Macy.
IT is, THEREUPON, this 2nd
day of June, 1855, by the Circuit
Court for Montgomery County
Maryland, sitting as a Court OF
Equity,
ORDERED, that the Complain
ants, by causing a copy of this
order to be inserted in some
newspaper of general circulation
published in Montgomery Coun
ty, Maryland, once a week fol
four successive weeks before the
18th day of July, 1855, give no
tice to the Defendants, George A
Macy, j. Martin Rausch, George
w. Marsh and Adolph Priester
whose addresses are unknown
of the object and substance OF
this Bill and warning them to be
and appear in this Court, in per
son or by solicitor, on or before
the 10Th day of July, 1855, tc