Evening star., 1954-11-16

the Senate yesterday tollosDs:
Are stco-existence" and
atomic stalemate" synony-
nous terms? II they are not,
just what is the difference?
Is the former merely an in.
evitable prelude to the latter?
And what of our foreign
policy and our defense policy
when such an atomic stale
mate takes place? Does not
atomic stalemate' mean in
, evitable Communist "nibbling
aggression" rather than peace
in our time? How many years
remain when we still have
some initiative left? These
are some. of the basic ques-
tions before the Government
and the people Of the United
States.
Certainly they are so Inn
portant and the results Of the
decisions made are so far
reaching that the Congress
and the American people must
be taken into the confidence
Of the administration. q.
All Share Responsibility
No matter what the deci-
sions are in the elections Of
1856, a Republican admins
tratien aand a Democratic
controlled Congress ip I the;
months Immediately ahead
share a heavy responsibility,
for the survival of this Re-
publicy and the possibility of
a ffHe world of free men
hangs in the balance.
The civilizations that -four
ished and died in the past had
opportunities for a limited
period of time to change the
course of history. Sooner or
later. however, they passed
"the point Of no return" and
the decisions were no longer
theirs to make.
Co-existence and atomic
stalemate will result in ulti-
mate Communist victory. I'm
less one believes that the men
in the Kremlin have COM
pletely changed their long y
term strategy Of ultimately
having a Communist world.
and no longer follow the doc
trine that in order to achieve
their ends anything is allow
able (including deception and
treacheryl. We must face UP
to the fact that the Commu-
mist concept Of peaceful co.. +
existence" means that the
United States or other free
nations Of the world will be
allowed to exist only until
communism Is able to sub
vert them from within or de-
stroy them by aggression from
without.
Warns Of Trojan Horse.
It is my belief that the So
Wet Union Is advancing the
Trojan horse of co-existence
only for the purpose of gain
ing sufficient time to accom-
plish what we may term.
atomic stalemate." !" When
would they hope to accom-
plish this objective? The tar
get date Is probably between
1857 and 1860.
There is some fallacious
thinking that when that point
arrives, the world will have
gained q stalemate peace be-
cause neither side win then
dare to use or threaten to use
Its atomic power against the
other. AT that point. so the
reasoning runs. the two great
world powers. the United
States and the Soviet Union,
will checkmate and inlmobilize
each other and q sort Of trou-
bled peace will settle down over
the balance Of the world.
Certainly we must face up to
the fact that the superiority
the United States has today
In q stockpile Of atomic weap-
onS and the means Of deliver
ing them viii be checkmated. y
and the nations which today
are toying with neutralisras
will be actively proclaiming It.
Let us examine the possible
ity then Of even q troubled
peace. 1t is more likely that at
that point. when the free world
hase become paralyzed and inn
mobilized by the realization
that the United States and
the Soviet Union could act and
react one upon the other with
! Overwhelming devastation that
the men In the Kremlin will
see their best opportunity to
start with what for the want
Of q better term I win call.
Operation Nibbling, !" wherein
they win seek To take over the
peripheral nations bite BY bite.
Cites s'Nibblinga Operation.
A. &l.o v,ri,.f flayns.cyl, xi.A