Evening star., 1953-07-30
u. ). Criticized
For Opposing
.Peipiing in U::N.
London Says Dulles
Ignores War Allies;
Nehru Wants Talks
By the Asseciated Press

LONDON. July 80. - The
United States stand against Red
China in the United Nations
came under fresh fire today in
London and New Delhi.
Secretary of State Dulles was
accused in the British House of
Commons of laying down a
policy line for the Korean peace
conference without taking into
account the views of United
States allies. Clement Attlee,
leader of the British Labor Party,
said it was peculiar that uni
lateral declaration of policy"
should come from Washington.
Mr.. Attlee spoke after the
Churchill government served
notice it believes Communist
China should displace Nation
aliSt China in the U.N. when
the time is right" :" The Acting
Foreign Secretary, Lord Sails
bury, said in the House of Lords
it would be improper and i'm
possible" for him to say now,
three days after the armistice
IN Korea, that the time had
arrived.
Called U. N. Problem.
The Acting Prime Minister.
Richard "A. Butler said Britain
believes Soviet Russia as well as
Communist China should be
represented at peace talks on
Korea. But he told Commons
the problem of Chinese repre-
sentation in the United Nations
could only be decided by the
U. N. itself and added:
Our conception of the U. N.
is that Of a family of nations
and not an anti-Communist
alliance"
British businessmen are eager
to extend their trading with
China, and it has been British
policy for months that a Ko-
rean armistice would pave the
way for consideration of Red
China's seating in the U. N.
Mr.. Dulles has said the United
States would feel free to use it's
veto if the question of seating
Red China comes up. Most U. N.
legal experts, however, take the
stand that the question of what
regime shall represent a country
is a procedural matter and not
subject to the Big Power veto.
Nehru Asks Talks With Reds.
Prime Minister Nehru of
India, long insistent that Mao
Tze-tung's China should have
the seat, urged today that these
Chinese be called into confer
ence with the major U. N. pow
ers that fought in the Korean
war. He suggested this meeting
be held ahead of the August II
U. N. Assembly meeting which
is to take up procedure for the
Korean peace conference.
In London today former Prime
Minister Attlee referred to Mr..
Dulles statement that the United
States reserved the right to quit
tha Yooooo onrfaronoo If tho Dads
were Stalling, and said:
1T does seem extraordinary
that a declaration should be
made that Korean unity must
be achieved and failing that. the
United States representative
would walk out of the confer
ence. That really does seem to
me quite contrary to the whole
spirit of the U. N.
There is general underlying
suggestion that if everything
does not go exactly as Mr.. Dulles
wants it then the United States
may go on its own. l think that
is a very dangerous suggestion"
Mr.. Attlee spoke in the House
of Commons.
Lord Salisbury, appearing in
the House of Lords, said the
United States ''is quite entitled
to take any position they like"
but he felt Britain should be
consulted if the United States
was proposing to walk out of
the Korean conference.
Canada has indicated it would
resist an attempt to use the veto
on Red China. Australians Prime
Minister. Robert G. Menzies, said
that member of the British COM
monwealth will not consider rec
ognition until there is peace in
Korea.