Evening star., 1951-03-27
xoRERT MELVIN CHARLES, Attorney
1022 Warner Building

KOBERT MELVIN CHARLES, Attorne'
1923 Warner Building
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
Court for the District Of Columbia
Holding Probate Court.-Adminlstra.
fion No. 66312.-IN RE ESTATE or
VICTORIA G; MUHTYAN; ;&ITeIT9ss some11mss
NSHN NNIxfNd An NEW W pATE FOR TRIAL
AND PROVIDING FOR PUBL1CA'
TION.-The notification as to INT
. trial of the issues framed in thl.
ease relating to the validity OF
paper writing bearing date the 1our.
feenth Q4th) day, OF Decemper
decedent and another bearing date
Of June nineteenth Q9). 1889 pur;
porting to be a codicil to said VII
and q paper writing bearing date
the second day of April, 1910 pur'
porting to be last will OF the dece.
dent and q revoking instrument o.
Victoria G. Muntyan sometimes
known as yictSsa GyTF5cS baen Setrned Mnns
as to all, Boscho aka. Bauseho
Guykitcs, Milan Gyukitcs, Maria
Iyatsisit oIsys Matyai, sSIf s'NoT TO BE FOUND
It is BY the Court this 10Th day o.
ORDEREU tnaI tne sdlu iSsoSS -; Ar
S3oth) day Of April, 1851, and that
this ORDER and the substance q q
said issues be published once week
for four successive weeks IN tne
Washington Law Reporter ana Twice
n week for the same period IN tne
Evening Star, the substance OF salo
issues being as follows
|. DID the decedept MAKE f ana 1ne e<eesss iess
according to law. a codicil to q VIII
bearing date Of December four
q II the decedent did make and
execute said codicil as mentioned IN
the preceding paragraph, did the
said codicil revoke item four 81 VIII
dated December fourteenth, 1883 :,
evidence in this case, .purporting TO
be q copy Of said codicil as afore-
said. a true copy of said codlcl.
4. II the decedent did make and exc,
cute according to law such codHll
as herein set forth and as mentioned
In the petition, has proper searcn
been made, therefor without oiscoV-
5. Did the decedent make and exc
cute according to law q will and tes-
lament bearing date the second day
Of April. 1910, as in the petition
3. Is the carbon copy introduced in
evidence in this case purporting 70
be . COPY of a will ana testament
bearing date the second OF ssG aay 4 81 ApI an
testament Of the decedent. and as
referred to in the petition.
Y. If the decedent did make and exc.
cute according to law will ano
testament bearing date the SECOND
day Of April, 1910, as set forth IN
the petition, did said decedent make
forth in the petition, and did the
said instrument revoke the remain
ing items of will dated December
fourteenth. 1888.
]. II the decedent did make and exc:
cute according to law such will and
testament bearing date the second
day Of April, 1910, has proper
sssseh been eae4eof msde therefor without
}. Did the decedent intend said will
and testament to be in force and
effect as q last will and testament.
Isl RICHMOND B.. KEECH. United
States District Judge. SEEN, NO
OBJECTION:-(S0 JACK H. HANT-
MAN. Of the Firm Of Major and
sintich ~ .tInTnsvs bI9aaway for NE New YorK
General OF the Federal Peoples
Republic Of Yusoslavia, New York
City representing Boscho or Bauscho
and Milan Gyukitcs. (S) THOMAS
NJ. RAYSOR. Attorney for the re-
9tsned Collector. National Press
Building, WASHINGTON, D: G; lseal:l
A true copy. Attest: THEODORE
SO0SWELL. Register of Wills. for
She District Of Columbia. Clerk Of
the Probate Court.
0h27s20,ap3.6,10.13