Evening star., 1951-03-30
ROBERT MELVIN CHARLES, Attorney
1923 Warner Building

IN The UNIFIED SlA1ES O1o h1S l
Court for the District OF Columbia
tion No. 66312-IN RE ESTATE OF
VICTORIA G. MUNTYAN. sometimes
known as VICTORIA GYUKITCS
MUNTYAN. DECEASED. = ORDER
FIXING NEW DATE FOR TRIAL
AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICA-
trial of. the issues framed in this
case relating to the validity of a
paper writing bearing date the four
teenth u4th) day. OF December,
1888 purporting to be a will of the
decedent and another bearing date
OF June nineteenth 19. 1889 pur-
porting to be codicil to said will
the second day of April, 1910 pur-
porting to be last will of the dece-
Victoria G. Muntyan sometimes
known as Victoria Gyukitcs Munt-
yam. deceased; having been returned
Guykites, Milan Gyukitcs. Maria
Guyktics, Angelina Guyktics and
Olga Matyai, NOT TO BE FOUND,
1t is by the Court this 10th day Of
March, 1851.
ORDERED that the said issues be. set
dowp St for TT trial a,r on The hd thrtisth isa
this ORDER and the substance of
said issues be published once a week
for four successive weeks in the
Washington Law Reporter and twice
week for the same period in the
Evening Star, the substance OF said
issues being as follows
l. Did the decedent make and execute
on the nineteenth day of June. 1888,
according to law, codicil to will
teenth: 1888.
2. If the decedent did make and
execute said codicil as mentioned in
the preceding paragraph. did the
said codicll revoke item four of will
dated December fourteenth. 1898
3. Is the carbon copy introduced in
evidence in this case, purporting to
be a copy Of said codicil as afore-
said, a true copy OF said codicil.
4. If the decedent did make and exc
cute according to law such codicil
in the petition, has proper search
been made. therefor without discov-
cry thereof
5. Did the decedent make and exc.
cute according to law will and tes-
lament bearing date the second day
Of April. 1910. as in the petition
alleged
g. Is the carbon copy introduced in
evidence in this case purporting to
be a copy of will and testament
bearing date the second day of April,
1910, true copy of said will and
testament of the decedent, and as
referred to in the petition.
z. If the decedent did make and exc
cute according to law will and
testament bearing date the second
day OF April, 1910, as set forth in
the petition. did said decedent make
q valid revoking instrument as set
forth in the petition, and did the
said instrument revoke the remain
ing items of will dated December
fourteenth 1885
s. If the decedent did make and exc
cute according to law such will and
day of April, 1910, has proper
discovery thereof
8. Did the decedent intend said will
and testament to be in force and
effect as last will and testament.
81 RICHMOND B. KEECH. United
States District Judge. SEEN, NO
OBJECTION:-(S) JACK II. HANT-
MAN. Of the Firm of Major and
Sintich, III Broadway, New York
City. N. Y, ATTORNEYS for the Consul
General Of the Federal Peoples
Republic of Yugoslavia. New York
City representing Boscho or Bauscho
and Milan Gyukitcs. (S) THOMAS
NJ RAYSOR. Attorney for the re-
signed Collector. National Press
Building. Washington. D. c. (Seal.)
A true copy. Attest: THEODORE
COGSWELL. REGISTER of Wills for
the District Of Columbia. Clerk Of
the Probate Court.
mh@7,3o,ap3, ,6,10,13