Evening star., 1951-04-03
RoBERT MELVIN CHARLES. Attorney
fih~H Warner kui1diuR

ROBERT MELVIN CHARLES, Attorney
1928 Warner Building
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
Soprt to5 the pistrist ua of GSiSmSla
tion No. 66312.-IN RE ESTATE OF
VICTORIA G. MUNTYAN. sometimes
known as VICTORIA GxUk1TCS
MuNTYAN. DECEASED: = ORDER
FIXING NEW DATE FOR TRIAL
AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLlCA-
TIoN.-The notification as to the
case relating to the validity Of q
paper writing bearing date the four
teentn tl4th) day. of Dscember,
1888 purporting TO be will OF the
decedent and another bearing date
OF June nineteenth t19l, 1889 plr-
porting to be q codicil to said will
and a paper writing bearing date
the second day OF April, l94o pur-
dent and revoking instrument of
Victoria G.. Muntyan sometimes
known as Victoria Gyukitcs Munt-
yam, deceased, having been returned
as TO all, Boscho aka. Bauscho
Guykitcs. Milan Gyukitcs, Maria
Ggyssf osa Mstys AngsopFf gNoF o oqyEts5 De Fousp sa
It is by the Court this 10th day Of
ORDERED that the said issues be set
down for trial en- the thirtieth
l30thl day Of April. 1881, and that
this ORDER and the substance Of
said issues be published once week
washington Law Reporter and twice
Q week for the. same period in the
Evening Star, the substance OF said
issues being as follows:--
/. Did the decedent make and execute
on the nineteenth day Of June. 1898,
according to law. a codtcil to q will
tssIin bearing sss date OF December four.
2. II the decedent did make and
execute said codicil as mentioned in
the preceding paragraph. did the
said codicil revoke item four of viii
dated December fourteenth. 1888.
8. Is the carbon copy introduced in
evidence In this case. purporting to
be Q copy OF said codici as afore-
said. a true copy of said codicil.
4. If the decedent did make and exc
cute according to law9 such codicil
as herein set forth and as mentioned
in the petition. has proper search
been made therefor without discov-
5. Did the decedent make and exc
cute according to law . will and tes-
lament bearing date the second day
Of April, 1910. as in the petition
alleged
8. Is the carbon copy introduced in
evidence in this case purporting to
be copy of q will and testament
bearing date the second day Of April.
1910. q true copy Of said will and
testament of the decedent. and as
referred to in the petition.
z. If the decedent did make and exc
cute according to law q will and
testament bearing date the second
day Of April. 1910. as set forth in
the petition. did said decedent make
valid revoking instrument as set
forth in the petition, and did the
said instrument revoke the remain
ing items of win dated December
fourteenth. 1898
8; c,ts Il the as.e.S, deesdent did make and exc;
testament bearing date the second
day of April. 1910. has proper
discovery thereof.
9. Did the decedent intend said will
and testament to be in force and
effect as last will and testament.
Sd RICHMOND B. KEECH. United
e5s5ss osjscTIoNsJ p1ssric. JpdSs; sscx SEEN = =. NO
MAN: NAN Of the Firm Of Major and
City. N; Y. ATTORNEYS for the Consul
General of the Federal Peoples
Republic of Yugoslavia. New York
City representing Boscho or Bauscho
and Milan Gyukitcs. (S) THOMAS
M. RAYSOR. Attorney for the re-
s,gned I,s Collector. National Press
suildiss' tdne WA Washington; D; 6; Seal
ne Distrat di aiessisT cosss e wills Sssk fo,
the Probate Court.
mh21 80. .ap3 ,6,lO,l3