Evening star., 1951-04-06
JOHN T. REGEs. Attorney.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
Court for the District of Columbia,
Holding Probate Court.--In re Estate
Of MOTLEY B. SoTHoRON. De
oRbER " puBLicATToN ii Iet
moneys. Goods, chatteIs. rights and
credits of Motley B. Sothoron. late
OF the District of Columbia. de-
ceased. having been granted herein
untC John Tab Regss On ths 81 & day
Of the residue Of said estate. partial
or otherwise. having as yet been
made to any OF the persons entitled
thereto as heirs at Law and next OF
kin of said decedent. and 1t having
been bee nni;tien MADE known 70 the Court ,Sg sy
herein tho 18th day Of February
1851. for the appointment Of a
Master to ascertain and determine
who are the. next of kin of said
Motley B. Sothoron. deceased. that
it is impossible for said executor
definitely to determine who are all
titled to participate in the residue
OF said estate and likewise impos-
sible to, compute, the. amount dis.
tributable to each Of the next Of
kin until each Of such next OF, kin
ing been ordered BY this Court the
14th day Of February. 1851. that
the said petition and PROCEEDINGS to
be taken thereon shall be deemed
plenary proceeding within the
meaning Of Title 19, Section .311
es coS%S. G2Ss Of IsTs sxo Of Edon III pssi
there having been issued pursuant
to. said order the usual process of
this Court. commanding all the
parties in interest in said estate 20
appear in the United States Dis
amb c0S15 hodar 1r ihs Probts Dsss e. ss GS
answer the. exigencies of the said
petition. which said process has
been duly returned mot to be
found" as to the unknown heirs at
law and next Of kin. II is this 21st
ans a 1 kMsr9h bgs gsl S 1d sEG That ss
Of kin Of Motley B. sothoron. de-
ceased. and all other persons con-
cerned, having or claiming to have
any right, title. interest or claim
in and to said estate be and they
hstsbS sis gos are eSmnandsd cn ma sS to N
1851. at 10 AM. to answer under
oath the said petition and to show
cause. II any they have, why they
severally have any interest in said
estate. or why they seyerally claim
any any right right to distriSutiye shares in n
the prayers Of said petition should
not be. granted and Master ap-
pointed as therein prayed. provided.
however and 1t is further ORDERED
That a COPY Of this order be pub
lished in the washington Law Re-
culation published In the District
Of Columbia. twice o month for
three consecutive months before the
return day. herein mentioned. the
first fl. q. Sf saiS d Implications to be not
IH6oHGik. iul6 LIN JudseA aAN1ss 5ssal A true true
oUEs, Deputy Register Of wills for
the District of Columbia. Clerk of
the Probate Court.
mh23. 30. .ap6. 90. my4.1s.
ROBERT MELVIN CHARLES. Attorney
1923 Warner Building
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
Court for the. District OF Columbia.
tion 40. 66312.-IN RE ESTATE OF
VICTORIA @. MUNTYAN. sometimes
known as VICTORIA GYukITcs
MpNTgAN MIRSIg Srp pEcEAsED EASE nop - oRDER Ty2EF
AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICA-
TION.-The notification as to the
trial OF the issues framed in this
case relating to the validity of 0
paper writing bearing date the four
teenth u4thl day of December,
193S, purporting to be will Of the
of June nineteenth f19). 1889 pur-
porting to be codicil to said will
and a paper writing bearing date
the second day of April 1910 pur-
porting to be last will of the dece-
: dent and q reyoking instrument OF
Victoria G: Muntyan SOMETIMES
yam, deceased. having % been returned turned
as to all. Boscho aka. Bauscho
Guykitcs, Milan Gyukitcs, Maria
Olga Matyai, mot TO BE FOUND
y is by the Court this 10th day OF
oRDEREbt' Gf,ERi 'aa That the said issues be set
down for trial on the thirtieth
this ORDER and the substance OF
said issues be published once a week
for four successive weeks In the
WASHINGTON Law Reporter and twice
z week for the. same period in the
Evening Star, the substance of said
issues being as follows
Did the decedent make and execute
on the nineteenth day of June, 1898.
according to law codicil to q win
bearing date OF Deeember four
Jeenth. 1888.
2. If the decedent did make and
execute said codicil as mentioned in
the preceding paragraph. did the
said codicil revoke item four of will
dated December fourteenth, 1898,
3. Is the carbon copy introduced In
evidence in this case, purporting to
be a copy Of said codicil as afore-
said. true copy of said codicil.
4. If the decedent did make and exc
cute according to law such codicil
as herein set forth and as mentioned
in the petition. has proper search
been made, therefor without discov-
5. Did the decedent make and exc
cute according to law a will and tes-
lament bearing date the second day
OF April, 1910. as in the petition
8. Is the carbon copy introduced in
evidence in this case purporting to
pc a copy of will and testament
bearing date the second day of April.
1870. true copy of said will and
testament OF the decedent, and as
referred to in the petition.
Z; c, II the decedent did make and exc
testament bearing date the second
gay OF April. 1910: as set forth in
the petition, did said decedent make
q yaiid revoking instrument as set
lorth in the petition, and did the
sa1d instrument revoke the remain
1ng fns,rtasI1S Items Of will dated December
8. II the decedent did make and exc
cute according to law such will and
testament bearing date the second
day of April, 1910, has proper
seaIch been made therefor without
=, discovery thereof.
U. Did the decedent intend said will
and testament to be in force and
erect as a last will and testament.
eS;1 Is RICHMOND B., KEECH. United
states District Judge. SEEN, NO
OBJECTION:-fS.l JACK II. .HANT-
MAN, of the Firm of Major and
Siintich' i1 III Broadway. New York
Cisy, Csy.i M Y: Attorneys for the Consul
Hepublic of Yugoslavia. New YorE
City representing Boscho or Bauscho
Ana MiIan Gyukitcs. fS.) THOMAS
M. RAYSOR, Attorney for the re-
Slgned Collector. National Press
Building. Washington. b. c. (seaI