Evening star., 1950-06-26
LEGAL NOTICES
R. DUNCAN CLARK, Attorney,

X. DUNCAN CLARK, Attorney,
STATE Of !eRMoMT ff1 MTsnHtsSni Mashinften G
G99nty; SIN GHANCERY' Wash
THEoDoRE NJ. DEWEY vs.. Ed
MAED H1EE INs1EXNeE Il pEWNG ane coMPASY. SATlSYAL
oRDER 2,EIs EIs OF H:,, J IPuBLIGATlIo9N;;ms ul y -
May g. 1850. in the above entitled
in the Court OF Chancery. within
and for the County of Washington,
State Of Vermont, on May IL, 1850.
setting forth in substance that: On
the Gath day of March 1925, one
Of Wsshington. "fa' IN the the District b e 'ei Of
Columbia, deceased. owned and held
a certain policy of insurance on his
life issued by the National Life In
suranse Company, a corporation
organlzed and existing by law and
in the county of Washington and
State of Vermont, said policy being
numbered 26,S40 and being in the
principal sum of S10.00000; that
in and by said policy and as a part
1925; there was named and desis-
sons of said insured. namely. the
defendant Edward Bradley Dewey
and the plaintiff Theodore Macrae
Dewey. share and share alike, Or
Dewey deceased at said city Of Wash
ington on the 18th day of March,
1850, leaving said policy in full
borsa,sa4I force and effect except as to the
as hereinafter alleged. That the
plaintiff is informed and believes
and thereon AYERS the facts to be,
that on July 20. 1885,. at said city
OF Washington, said insured was,
and for for some m time. time prior ,t tneEet9;
mentally, and physically. and there
by and by reason of his advanced
age, was susceptible to be easily mis-
led and Influenced and then and
there the defendant Edward B.
torneys and divers others acting in
vantage Of said condition and to
alienate him from his son, said
plaintiff, made to him. said insured,
and by divers false, malicious state
ments and conduct to and toward
said insured and divers other per-
sons with respect to the plaintiff.
did influence and induce said in-
f1ciary. in said policy to his other
son, defendant Edward B. Dewey,
alone, and the deletion of the plain
tiff therefrom as beneficiary, which
said request was, on August 10.
1896, as provided by the terms of
ano from thence to the death of the
insured as aforesaid, by divers false
and fraudulent representations con-
cerning the plaintiff made to said
insured, and other false and mali
cious statements and conduct to and
toward said insured and divers other
with like fraudulent DESIGN and
purpose, did influence and induce
said insured to maintain said policy
with the beneficiary thereof so
changed and the plaintiff deleted
snd as Sssh ssd poey so
mained at the death Of the insured.
That by the means aforesaid. and
divers other means to the plaintiff
unknown, said insured was led.
instisated and induced to divers
Plaintiff. that is to say; that he be-
1ieved and acted upon the belief that
the plaintiff was a hypocrite, q
prevaricator, selfish, sneaking and
untruthful person. by reason where
Of the plaintiff was eliminated as
and the defendant unjustly en-
riched by being named as the sole
beneficiary of said policy as afore-
said: that there had peen no breach
of the usual and ordinary relations
Of father and son between said in
istence of any relations Of a char
acter in any way tending to evi-
dence or Justify such beliefs by said
insured as genuine and unmistaken
lost and was deprived Of the ex-
peetancy as such beneficiary that
he had formerly had and would have
had and at the time Of the death
Of the insured would nave realized
but for the fraud: deceit, undue in
and sondast sna Of tn Ge
servants. agents and others as afore-
said and divers other damages and
injuries said defendant did then and
t1sFf jnSs upon PSn nhint ths plaintiff
that the defendants and each of
them do answer fully the foreg Ding
allegations, but not under oath;
that the -ourt viii order and de-
cree that said change Of beneficiary
policy. as respects the. benefciaries
thereof be restored to those formerly
named and designated as such there
IN as aforesaid; that the defendant
National Life Insurance -ompany be
pending these PROCEEDINGS. from pay
ing to the defendant Edward B.
Dewey, his servants or agents, or
upon his order or in his behalf: any
part OF the proceeds or, avails Of
nizine or dealing With said defend
ant Edward B. Dewey as sole bene-
ficiary. all until further order of
court. That plaintiff have O writ Of
subpoena against each of the de-
pendency Of this suit, and for such
other. and further relief in the
premises as to the court may seem
meet. And. it having. been made to
appear that notice of the pendency
Of said suit be given to the defend;
order of service on him.. as provided
by law. which service having been
made to appear impossible, 1T IS BY
SAID COURT ORDERED AND d.
RECTED that notice of the pendency
Of this suit be given by publication,
this. order: and summon said de-
fendant edward @. Dewey to appear
before the. Court Of Chancery within
and. fol. the county Of Washington
to,,I.r to be held he iy at Montpelier. in the b,
Vermont. on the 18th day. of July
1850. at 1870 O'Clock in the after
Hoon of said day, and make answer
% the same. to be puolisned three
Geeks successively in the Evenins
city of WASHINGTON, District ol
Columbia and in the Montpelier Eve.
ping Argus, newspaper printed al
Montpelier. in the county of Wash
tngton and State of Vermont, the
last publication of which to be a
least twenty-one days previous Il
said July 1s, 1850. DATED at Mont.
pelier. In the county of Washingtor