Montana labor news., 1949-01-06

THE COUNTY OF SILVER BOW.
s,.4s,.
Hazel Hurhes. Pi,lntlif. vs. william
Hughes. Defendant
ALIAS SUMMONS
The, State 81 Montana Sends Greetings
70 TIE Above Named Defendant;
You arc hereby summoned 20 answer the
complaint IN this acton. Which IS filed
In the office O, The Clerk Of this Court,
a copy o. which is herewith served upon
you. and 10 flc your a. yer and serve =
copy thereof upon the plaintiffs attorney
within twenty DAYS after thr service OF
this exclusive q the day OF
service. and IN case o. your failure 70
appear or answer. judgment viii b. taken
sealnst yoa by default for TIE relief de-
maadei in the complaint. Plaintiff al
leges
That the plaintiff and defendant inter
married IN the City o. Deer Lodge, Coun-
~ o. Powell. STATE ~ Montana. on the
10th day Of July. 1913. and ever sl-nee
have been. and nos are. husband md
wife.
That the plaintiff &. nov. and has heen
continuously FOR more than oue IA YEAR
last past. a boua-nde resident - the
State OF Montana. and that she has acer
continuously a hona-fide resident % saii
RAtA' - thfA sAANN ttAttht -
the commencement Of this action on tie
30th day Of October. l9fs.
That there are 10 children the issue
OF said marriage
Tha, Tor the puEpasc u lrducing the
plaintiff to consent 20 the said marriage.
the defendant falsely and frsndulently
represented that he sas IN good health.
and WAS physically competent 10 marry
the plaintiff. and concealed from the
plaintiff his true physical condition
That the defendant vas not then and
there in good health. ard was not Al
the time of entering into said marriage
physically fit to marry plaintiff. but a.
the time OF said marriage va IN poor
health and physically unfi, 70 marry
plaintiff. and was suffering from y ;umor
on the brain. which inoompac.tsfed him
from earning a living. ard caused him 70
be morose and to suffer from mental de
preston aud melancholy. and said condl-
ton is propensity getting WORSE. and
plaintiff IS Informed and believes, And
therefore alleges is incurabie
That the plaintiff WAS induced to con-
sent to the said marriage by the ssit
representations. which we're false a.
Untrue. and were known TO defendant &c
be false and untrue. and which she be
lleved at the time o, her said marriage
to be true. and that II the said repre-
sentationS ma not Dtfn Nhne 10 nef
and said conceaiment had not been prsc'
ticed. plaintiff would never have con
scented to the said marriage.
That Immediately upon her discovery O.
the falsehood OF said Representations to
wit. on or about the sist day OF August
i9<s, the plaintiff ceased to co-habit Will
the defendant, and has never since co
habited with the defendant
Plaintiff alleges that her maiden nam
was Hazel Miller.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff nrsys judgmen
against the said defendant that the SAT-
marriage entered into between the plain
TIT and defendant ON the 10th day o
July. l9t8. be. By decree OF this co1r'
annulled. vacated ard set asiie, and he'll
to be void aad OF no effect. tim; plaintiff
be forever released and discharged fror
any and all obligations arising from fai
marriage and said contract OF marriage
and that the maiden nawe Of aid DE-
PENDANT. to-wit: Hazel Miller. be restore
to her. and for such other ard furthe
relief as 70 the Court may seem equ.tahl
and Just In the premises
witness my hand and the seal Of sal
Court this 18th dag Of December, a. u
1913.
court Seal ELMER SHEA,
CirrI
By DAN BUKvfCH. Deputy Cleri
r. c. Fluent. Attorney for Plaintiff
First publication Dec. %. i9t8-it.