Montana labor news., 1949-01-13

STATE or MONTANA. IN tND fON
THE COUNTY or SILVER BOW.
o.<5,.
Hazel Hughes. Pisintiff. william
Hughes. Defendant
ALIAS SUMMONS
The state OF Mon,an. Sends Greetings
- the Above Named Defendant
You are hereby summoned to snSwer the
complaint IN TITS action. which IS filed
IN the office OF the Clerk o, ths Court,
a cops OF which IS herewith served upon
Won. and 20 file your a1sser ard serve a
copy thereof upon tie plaintiffs attorney
within twenty DAYS after the service Of
his exclusive az the day OF
service. and in CASE Of your failure to
appear or answer. judgment viii be taken
ssainst you by de,aul, for the relief de-
mautrd IN TIE complaint Plaintiff al
leges
That the plaintiff and defendant inter
married IN the city u Deer Lodge. Coun-
~ Of Powell. state O.. Montana. on ,he
.oth day Of July. 1913. ard ever since
have been. and nov are. husband and
vife.
That the plaintiff Is now. and has been
continuously for more than one 81 war
las. past. a bona flde resident az The
State OF Montana. ayfi that SHE has been
CONTINUOUSLY n ibiaH-4ilt iFaANItAN VI SAti
state for said time Immediately preceding
the commencement OF this action on the
goth day OF October. 1913
That there are no children the issue
o, said marriage
That for the purpose OF inducing The
plaintiff to Consent to the said marriage,
the defendant falsely and fraudulent!y
represented that he was in good health,
and was physically competent 10 marry
the plaintiff. and concealed from the
plaintiff, his true physical condition
That the defendant WAS not then And
there In good health. and VAS not al
the time OF entering into said marriage
physically 1T to marry plaintiff. bat a.
the time Of said marriage WAS IN poo
health and physically unfit to MARI,
plaintiff. and WAS suffering from a tumo'
on the brain. which incompaeltated hin
from earning n living. and caused him q
be morose and 10 suffer from mental de
preston and melancholy. and said eondi
ton IS progressisiy getting worse. snt
plaintiff IS Informed and believes, an'
therefore alleges IS incurahle
Tint the plaintiff was induced to con
sent to the said marriage by the sait
representations. which were false AM
untrue. and we're known to defendant I
be false and untrue. and which she be
licved at the time OF her said marTing
TO be true. and that II the said repre-
sensations had not been made to hei
and said conceaiment had not been prAe
ticed. plaintiff would never have con
scented to the said marriage.
Thai immediately upon her discovery o
the falsehood OF said representations TO
wit. on or about the 3lst day ofFAugus
1913. the plaintiff ceased to co-hagat wit
the defendant. and has never siAEs co
habited with the defendant
Plaintiff alleges that her maiden nam
vas Hazel Miller.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prsys ludgmer
against the said defendant that the sal
marriage entered into between the plain
tn and defendant on tile 10th day {
July. 1913. be. by decree OF this Cour
~annulled. vacated and set aside. and hcl
TO be void and Of 10 effect. that plainti
he forever released and discharged ffo'
any and all obligations arising from raj
marriage and said contract % marriage
and that the maiden name Of said d
PENDANT, to-wit: Hazel Miller. be restore
to her. and for such other and fufth'
relief as 20 the Court may seem equltsA
and inst IN the premises
witness my hand and the seal OF sa
Court this 18th day OF December. A !
1915.
lCour. Seal ELMER SHEA.
Cler
By DAN BUKvICH. Deputy Cler
i. c. Fluent. Attorney for Plaintiff
First publication Dec. Is, 1913 At