Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1949-10-13
ORDER OF
PUBLICATION


vile Bell Grosvenor, from the de-
PENDANT, Helen Rowland Gros-
venor, and for such other and fur
Their relief askhe case may require.
The Complaint for divorce states:
l. That the plaintiff, Melville
Bell Grosvenor, is, citizen of the
United States and a resident of
the State of Maryland and resides
in Montgomery County, Maryland,
and brings this suit in his own
right.
2. That the defendant, Helen
Rowland Grosvenor, is a citizen of
the United States and a non-resi-
dent of the State of Maryland and
resides in the District of Columbia
and is sued in her own right.
8. That the plaintiff and defen-
dant were duly married to each
other, to-wit, on the 4th day of
January, 1924, at Waterbury,
Connecticut, in the First Congre-
gational Church of Waterbury, by
the Reverend DR.. Charles Allen
Dinsmore, a minister of the Con-
gregational Church duly authorized
to perform the marriage ceremony.
A, That Immediately after said
marriage the plaintiff and defen-
dant went to Bermuda for three
weeks and then resided in Brook
Ign, New York, where plaintiff
was an Ensign in the United
States Navy, attached to a Naval
vessel at the Brooklyn Navy Yard.
Plaintiff resigned from the Navy
on March Is, 1924, and from April
3 to August 2, 1924, plaintiff and
defendant were on trip in Europe
undertaken by plaintiff for the
purpose of accomplishing work
which would impress and be accept
able to his prospective employers.
Beginning September Is, 1924, I'M
til May 1, 1926, plaintiff and de-
PENDANT resided at 2900 Connecti-
cut Avenue, Washington, D. c.,
and from May l, 1926, until Feb
ruary 16, 1913, plaintiff and de-
PENDANT resided at 29O1 Wood
land Drive, Washington, D. c.,
where they lived together as hus-
band and wife; that on the latter
date the defendant by her neglect
and cruel inhuman treatment and
failure to conduct herself as wife
should, forced plaintiff, under
physicians care, to leave defen-
dant, and since said last mentioned
date, the parties have lived sepa-
rate and apart from each other
without cohabitation, and still do
live separate and apart, and there
is no reasonable expectation of re-
Cancellation.
5. That after defendant forced
plaintiff to leave her and their
home as aforesaid, plaintiff went
to Emergency Hospital, Wash
ington, D. c., and to Shepherd
Pratt Hospital, Towson, Maryland,
where he remained until April 26,
when he returned to Washington,
D. C. and took up residence at the
Cosmos Club until June Is, 1913,
when he moved to Chevy Chase
Country Club in Chevy Chase,
Montgomery County, Maryland,
remaining at the latter residence
until October 20, 1913, when he
moved to his present address at
600 Grosvenor Lane, Bethesda,
Maryland where he has resided
ever since, does now reside, and
which is his bona fide residence.
6. That defendant after forcing
plaintiff to leave her and their
home as aforesaid continued to re-
side in said home until she sold
same about July, 1949, when she
went to reside at her present adj
dress, 3031 Sedgewick Street, NV,
Washington, d. c., where she has
resided ever since and does now
reside.
Z. Throughout the married life
of the parties defendant has con-
almost without surcease,
hampered plaintiff in the pursuit
of his chosen career; plaintiff is
an assistant editor of the National
Geographic Magazine, having COM
menced work for that employer
Is, 1924; throughout
his career with that employer he
has actively engaged in the taking
of photographs for publication in
said Magazine and in the writing
of stories for the same purpose,
and doing general editing work
in the production of said Magazine.
On the 1924 trip to Europe afore-
said plaintiff desired to make some
effort during the four months to
bring back sufficient photographs
worthy of publication in order to
impress his prospective employers
as to his ability in that field, but
defendants. attitude was that she
could see no reason why plaintiff
wanted to take photographs or
write due to the fact that he was
the Editors. son and his job was
assured, and this, despite the fact
that plaintiff had resigned from
the United States Navy to make
travel, writing, and photography
Ms life work.
8. Prior to their marriage afore-
said defendant had always evinced
great pleasure in visiting plaintiffs