Evening star., 1947-09-27
u. NJ.
Continued FROM First Page.


and that they definitely would with.
draw If the United Nations proposed
an Arab-Jewish solution which wa.
unsatisfactory to either side. This
was by way of warning the U. N
that the British would not neces-
sarily enforce U. N. policy decisions
Mr.. Vishinsky said he did moi
know exactly what the British pcli.
cy statement meant, but I'm afraie
the British proposal for ultimate
withdrawal from Palestine should
mean ultimate withdrawal of Jew.
from Palestine--if that is so oul
attitude is certainly negative"
New Clash Appears Likely.
Another clash between the United
States and Russia appeared likely
to develop today in the Assembly :
Political Committee, where action
is pending on an American proposal
to create a special commission to
watch the Greek border and-as the
Americans insist - protect" the
Greeks against aggression by Yugo-
slavia, Bulgaria and Albania.
Spokesemen for Yugoslavia and
the Ukraine spent most of yester-
days committee session arguing
their viewpoints.
Finally Carlos P. Romulo of the
Philippines suggested that that COM
mittee shut off debate, that the ar
guments were all old. A similar line
was taken by American Delegate
Herschel v. johnson who said he
had been listening to the same
charges from such sources for the
past three months and thought de-
bate ought to be closed.
However, it was indicated that
Slav bloc spokesmen would have
more to say today and that fight
probably would develop over the
specific question of bringing the
American proposal to a vote.
This is in line with usual Soviet
tactics. When beaten on an issue in
preliminary stage, they normally
prefer to fight it all the way through
to make the record of each country
clear and force lineup of votes to
the fullest extent possible.
Extract From Statement.
The following is an extract from
Mr.. Visninsky's statement at his
press conference:
In my statement 7 said that the
facts I produced constitute only an
inconsiderable part of that sea of
fire which Is being famed by the
reactionary circles in certain coun-
tries and especially in. the u. S. A.
from all sides to start the fire of a
new war. In my address I only
mentioned some of those facts. Now
I am asked why I mentioned only
these facts which actually men,
toned and not any others. Every
day receive quite a few letters in
which find not only unfriendliness
and malevolence but I am also often
advised to name and expose still
more warmongers who even without
my assistance became notorious
here. But maybe on our part we
should contribute to the cause of
exposing warmongers still further,
by adding to my list some other
names.
In this case I should certainly
mention Bullitt, who has been war
mongering against the Soviet Union
for number of years and whose
specially is to freighten with the
Soviet Unions might and its really
powerful economy.
Then T should say q few words
about Frank Gannett, who now is
back from his distant wanderings
and who, at a luncheon of the Ma
tional Association of Public Rela-
tions Counsel, slanderously stated
that "the greatest menace to world
peace today Is Russia" This delirium
was published by the New York
Times in its issue of September 10
under the striking heading: Soviet
Chief Peril, Says Gannet, Back"
Weekly Is Quoted.
An article published in the Bar
rons Weekly, publication of the
businessmen" of Wall Street, may
be Of special interest In this ar
ticle one can read the following
pearls:
Should the withdrawal take
place." writes the weekly, meaning
the withdrawal of the U. S. S. r.
from the United Nations, both the
economic cooperation among the
western nations and rearmament
would have to proceed at height
ened pace. The globe would frankly
be divided into two worlds, and our
world would see the complete clarity
the need for continuously gaining
strength. Translating into business
terms, we should then have a re-
boom, in which the pro-
curement of military weapons would
not be limited to those usable in this
country, but would take in whatever
might profitably be deployed in
Western Europe and the Pacific.
War Profits Cited.
In my address of September 18
I mentioned the immense profits
gained by the United States capi-
talist monopolies as a result OF the
Second World War. stated the
total sum of those profits for the
five war years as amounting to1
$50, ,ooo, ,o0o, 900.
That statement got under some
body's skin. The Daily News blasted
with an editorial which rather
called names at me than displayed
logic and common sense.
Radio Commentator Walter Min
chell also made his voice heard. The
new American Baron Munchausen,
famous, as is known, for his utterly
absurd lies, disgorged a lot of rub
bish apparently intended to cover
up the real motives of his lampoon.
According to the logic of this
sage, you cannot dominate anything
or any one with demobilized Army,
a laid-up Navy and grounded air
force.
1t is an amazingly stunning argu-
Winchell finds 1t ir-
resistible. as If an army could not
be modified, as Is the case when a
war Is launched, and as If q navy
could not put out and an air force
ne,tlI faHe - n,,$ x,kAvS %ha~a