The Waterbury Democrat., 1946-02-07
A REPORT ON AMERICAN
 CRACKPOTrEnx ~.,

fTo Q, ., Asl'y 0en1 ClAFk, Dept
 of guatlce.l
 since two grand juries have in. tlleled Che % alleged seditlonists, lsn't Che Dept of Justice prcsunl- lna to act FOR and AS the Supreme Court in assuming that the Supreme Court would throw the case out2 fl this really is the view ot thn supreme Court, why doesn't the chief Justice call for the rec turn of Supreme Court Justice ROD. ert "A, Jackson, who is prosecuting kha NAxis at Nuremberg2 Why did N affirm the conviction Of Yama- Ihltae Certainly the Supreme Courts decisions ought to clartfy just wny N is no crime to urge people to do in the U, s. the same thing for which a U. s. Supreme Court ,I,istice is asking THE DEATH PENALTY at Nuremberg.
 Well, this reporter has spoken to a great many Constitutional law- yers In the past i2 years--and their opinions differ as widely as psychic. !. krists. Mir. Justice Holmes said there would necessarily be a dif- ference in opinion on the law, or otherwise, if there was olsSen. in the Supreme Court, it would simply be case of wrong addl- ton.
 How does the Dept of Justice know how t,,e Supreme Court will hold? Why doesn't it give the Su- nrerne Court a chance to rule? AL ter all, the Supreme Court Justices were appointed to judge-and the Dept of Justice prosecute.
 In our own country, two grand iuries have acted by handing up Tn. dictrnents. upon the facts-against 96 alleged seditionistS, based upon what they themselves had done 'rhe Dept of Justice now heSltates not on the basis of the grand iufv indictments, not on the baslS Inf what it knows the defendants have done. but solely on the basis of what 1t thinks the Supreme Court will do, If the case gets that lar.
 Why not let the Supreme Court speak for itself7 And why not let the Dept of Justice speak Tor the American people, whose sacrifices 10 ston this kind of thing in the world have cost them so much and Will continue to cost them more in the years to come.
 America lost World War one on fine floor of the U. $. Senate. Thc principles for which We fought this one are being quietly Strangled be- hind the beautiful doors Of the Dept of Justice.
 Tn the old tradition of the Ameri- can press, this reporter wishes to exercise his Constitutional privilege He would like to ask the U. s. pros- ecutors just why the following de- fendants are not prosecuted or charges of sedition Or. if they are not, why We are continuing the wal trials program in occupied areas.
 Defendants Gerald Winrod, Lizzie Dilling. Lawrence Dennis and Er- nest F. EiInhurst were not content 10 SbAy llCAC anu NSADO GSSO1~Ao garbage. They visited the Nag Fatherland where Nazi officials greeted them like heroes. The on' feet of their journey was to study Nazi strategy first-hand. They ab' sorbed the tactics of Naz killers ana full of lies. And they never for returned to America with trunk got the Nazi terror technique. These devotees of Nazism aped Hitler! strategy and are still employing 1t
 George Deatherage. Frank Clark Charles Hudson and Winrod ara just a handful of the alleged con- spirators who received bales oI propaganda from World Service the NaZi overseas propaganda or. ganlzation. Now get this gall: Int defendants also relayed their owT rags to World Service" for distrt' button in Maitland!
 F. K. Ferenz. another of thos'