Evening star., 1944-10-29

|
Righteous Indignation Virtue;
Subway Plans Civic Study Job
| BY JESSE sUTER.
Right and Duty of District People to Be Indignant
Ms nasp p election the % % % % sas r 5 s sS.
only the privilege but the right and duty to nurse and register their
repre-
% res M % esp ers @ S D @
who had With these
fighting
the coming no only permitted
ss Of ss nf TO 5 Of the
Have been ON active the Naval o Se
sr; am % outside $ O United a n.s Left
up including
very s W e m h rem naen rsnoy eam tn this Dng.
to now The soldier vote biz Date has es
the etssns the District have to sit around
Granted there of
they are in this direction or that the there still
vote until they entered the service
arguing keep Roosevelt
s s ss ms saying sffs na M s s You
forms Tor the state vote were & str the other DAY
do with of those can't anyhow the the
possible there for keeping manac the hands
the District influence
than the people many the States.
Especially by unjust
lived there until the Army called them protect those rights which they
so s only as the on the sns % m o Dass s
unust treated deprived feeling
and 5 p pn h o nao s @ the
District Of Col Columbia earnestly that the yOtess and
indignant and mad their nequtabe political plight demand
the which When
SHAH have provide that there shan ee
the and among the electors Of President Vice President
the Of the United States in M such numbers and with such
be subject to amendment and repeal"
Proposed Subway Primarily Federal Obligation
OF public and civic interest the
and traffic systems The plans Include two subVys
e entire matter is submitted by the commsoners prior to- aeen
by them for STUDY criticism fa by .nd the public This
all of the civic and business of the District There
Associations Federation of Civic Associations Federation
This new subway plan has been fully described series of Illus
a sd articles os which Ra been % The Star M appears
the probability of its being public convenience and increasing
In the study Of this problem break
several al mpG1tsns mp nesetsE Elements;
80 Are the routes SUGGESTED calculated to give the greatest relief
possible justify
Who shall build and who shall
(s Who will foot the bllq
"a "a What What obgaon d4 a q the Federal Government
u Ie What obligation of the transit company?
IN @ wh ne @ recent SUBWAY survey 50 as to note @ to what
expenditure required for carrying both the highway
projects
Eight years Peoples
advocating subway element solution
local transportation problems He tried to Congress appropriate
feasibility desrabIy
possibility building here He thought s25 would
finance such but civic leaders held that would
that
discussion 1886 Philadelphia engineer dealt with
possibility Columbia
lively the subway included
the
loading unloading
through this important trunk railway
as could be diverted to it with benefit to the traffic.
respectively
including
of diagonal
Pennsylvania Of Seventeenth
Fifth
with surface lines serving the sections
this
recommendations which had been proposed in 1885
by the peoples counsel
with the belief that
highway
primarily Federal obligation The
relief recognized be
establishment
with the District Columbia affairs
obligation the Federal Government
substantial the such major
substantial portion the extraordinary expenditures Tor
the Federal
the failure of the Gov
the annual cost of the
and Identification Of its National Capital
and high
should
period that without
District the levyng of taxes
lay citizen approaching these plans for an understanding
problems highly technical
Many difficulties
in his
transportation value himself
1f i i with ti