The people's voice. [volume] (Helena, Mont.) 1939-1969, 1943-06-25


ders from an owners not from a pro-
government.
i Whatever courts are established
will render decisions to protect vested
and aggressive interests.
An international dictatorship of
property control is the inevitable al
tentative to a socialized economy,
and will provide strange, but brief
interlude between World War II and
World War III.
Early last year, Eugene P. Thomas,
president of the National Trade Coun-
Gil stated:
1--WE must not have any illusions
as to postwar conditions. The United
States, the British Commonwealth
and their Allies will be forced to pol
ice the world for an indefinite period
1t may be necessary to maintain
armies in the enemy countries for
years after the peace treaty is signed
In the carrying out of the economic
terms of the peace treaty, American
/
flicted countries as advisers and adj
ministrators."
/ FUTILITY ALWAYS FAILS
The latest census of Postwar
Plans" lists 2O6. They are not ra-
toned
| The basic thesis of all, is brotherly
love to the four corners of the global
earth,-to be chiefly controlled by the
Big Four-Britain and America run
ming neck and neck out in front, with
Russia nosing too close to please the
ruling classes of the Anglo-American
Axis, and China the Cinderella of the
Foursome
This brotherly love tune may be
partly due to the fact it is sometimes
easier to profess love for brothers
land sisters) we haven't seen, than
for those we have, particularly if
those within vision demand a high
standard of living-and those without
don't know what it means.
| All of the major P. w. Plans are
designed to keep the profit system
going, just as our "Old Dea1' did
and failing, produced the New Deal"
which in its turns didn't register such
complete failure, because a conven-
lent World War II gave it an alibi-
and fillip.
The United Nations seem to require
the glue of a global war-to keep
them that way.
This writer was one of a small
group which submitted to President
Wilson in the White House-during
his brief visit here between sessions
of the Versailles Conference Post
World War 1 Plan = similar to the
present plan of the British Labor
party.
President Wilson indicated APPROX
al, but stated (paraphrased) -"NearIy
everybody over there seems to want
nearly everything"
"TOo LATE" AGGRESSION
Nearly all P. w. Plans involve the
use of force to quarantine "aggres-
sors.
Up to World War Britain, France,
Belgium, Holland, and the United
States (tl1rough financial and "conces-
sions" Imperialism, were the major
aggressor nations with Germany,
Japan and Italy aspiring to initiate.
Arnold Toynbee, English publicist,
discussing Germany's aggression plan,
in his book Nationality and the
War;" in 1912 admitted:
al,
of the earth were occupied already"
Nearly all P. W. Plans provide for
disarmament" and an international
police force" which-despite disavow-
als-will probably be controlled by
the British Commonwealth, the United
States, France and Holland. Russia
has reason not to trust the democra-
cies-or the Vatican
After World War I, the major ag-
gressor nation, Germany, was dis
armed, along with her satellite states,
Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Bull
garia
The leading "democracies" - polit-
ical-in the current war, had spent
billions to exterminate German mill
tarism, and then after the Armistice,
started in loaning Germany more bill
lions to pay reparations, and to start
her militarism again!
Germany took her cue from pump
printing by the mocracies-Wthout
further prompting.
CHANGING SIDES IN WAR
0f Of iotc
cialized economy, even before Russia
showed her military prowess, dictated
the foreign policies of Britain, France,
the Vatican and the United States
not apprehension of Germany's emerg-
ing militarism which they financed
and fostered = in Spain - the anti
chamber to Munich, which led to the
invasion of Poland, and the raging
Global War.
These three political democracies
have changed sides and changed their
definition of "aggressor' nation, since
this war started, in Spain.
The economic system of these three
democracies dictated this change.
There is no warrant in experience
D. logic to assume that the economic
privileges and the economic-profit sys-
.em of the British Commonwealth, the
United States, France and Holland
will not lead them to change sides,
md change the definition of "aggres-
,or" nations following this war, ALSO
as soon as commercial interests die
ate such change.
John Stuart Mill century ago