The Waterbury Democrat., 1943-08-31
Eleven Civil Suits
 Added To Court List
S25,O00 Damages Asked in Controversy Over Estate; Injured Lad Asks $15,O00 for Injuries Incurred

Injured Lad Asks $15,0
 Damages of $25, ,O00 are administrative of the estate Waterbury, and Lawrence L. Gaess, from Albert H. Gaess 8 of this city, over alleged refl GaeSs's share in a trust flu building for a local concern. in local county courts this tember 2.
 Agreement Made
 The Gaess complaint states the two defendants and the late Mir. Gaess entered into an agreement Feb. 3, 1941, to deposit certain amounts of money periodically with A. H. Gaess who was to serve as permanent trustee to accumulate cash either to purchase the desired building or construct one. Accord ing to terms of the agreement, the money was to be divided into three parts of the original intention of the fund was not followed through, the complaint states. In the event of death the estates of the three indi- viduals were to be entitled to the same rights, the writ adds.
 It is claimed that upon the death of MT. Gaess, Dec. 2, 1942 and the appointment of the administrative the two defendants were asked for payment of the estates share and they refused.
 The superior court is asked to or der an accounting and appoint a re- ceiver to take charge of the funds.
 In another action in which large sum of damages is sought, Carl Christian of Middlebury is suing Leo Ubaldi of Oxrord as the result of a bicycle-car collision which oc- cured last July 10 on Middlebury road near Judd's corner. The 14- year-old plaintiff. who brings the suit through his father, Joseph, asks for e15 1000 to compensate for the injuries.
 The complaint states the car of the defendant drove to the left of the road and into the bicyclist causing him to sustain a fracture of his left leg and many abarsions.
 Tenant Cues
 Rita A. Fox of Waterbury, who claims she sustained a severe hand injury when window sash cords at her tenement at 48 Washington street broke and shattered glass, has instituted $10,000 civil action in superior court against the land- lord, John Parker. The plaintiff claims the defendant was negligent for failing to inspect the window and note the need of repair to the putty. It is alleged the window pane was loosened and the window shat tered from the impact created when the cords broke. The woman was shaking a dust-mop through the window at the time of the accident, the complaint states.
 Two civil actions have been filed in common pleas court by Joseph Chesnas, doing business as the Ches- mas Commercial Body Co.,, against the Apothecaries Hall Go. of Wat erbury Both suits are based on an explosion which occurred July g, 1912 while two workers were welding barrels for the defendant. It is claimed the barrels had not been cleaned of chemicals, as allegedly agreed, and the explosion resulted from their contact with the heat of the welding torches.
 One of the Chesnas complaints stated that Stanley Chesnas re- ceived severe injuries which result cd in compensation payments of $240 and medical expenses of $56995 Damages of $2,500 are sought. In the other suit it is claimed John Jackus was injured and damages.
 Helen M. DWyer of Waterbury has filed a 5000 action in common pleas court against the General Baking Co. of Waterbury claiming she bit into fo,Nign substance while eating Bond rye bread June 29 and became ill. The product was purchased at Simpsons store at 843 Baldwin street, the complaint states.
 OdLIlucl 1LOSCllJlldl Ol WdCCI DuI y is named defendant in a $385 civil common pleas court action filed by Albert Laukaitis of Woodbury. The suit is based on an automobile col lision which occurred Jan. 12 in Woodbury, and allegedly resulted in damages amounting to $180.35 to the car
 Roland Irion of Waterbury, ad- ministrator of the estate of Albert Irion, seeks $500 damages from George and Helen Lezotte, both of this city. The suit, filed in common pleas court in the form of com mon court writ, lists debt of $379. Details will be filed later in an amended complaint.
 A divorce suit was filed by Mar garet Barber Crochet of Waterbury against Luc.an P. Crochet of Wat erbury superior court. The couple married Fob. 20, 1915 and has a minor child. The petitioner accuses her husband of misconduct and claims he has been intolerably cruel aince February, 1940. Alimony as vi as divorce decree is sought.
 Tne government of Colombia has