Evening star., 1941-11-14
Court Assignments
DISTRICT COURT.

|
policy of the court not to grant post
ponement if the aforesaid notice Is
not given, except when extraordi-
nary conditions have prevented the
| giving of such notice.
Roll call motions will be at 9.46
am, as heretofore has been the
practice.
Motions-Justice David A. Pine.
Assignments for Monday;
Koonin VS.. Michaelson: attorneys,
Roonin-Tulman.
Copeland VS.. Copeland; attor-
neys, Hollowell-Conn.
Jordan, etc, VS.. Yellow Cab Co,
ct al; attorneys, Kelly-Schwartz.
Wyant VS.. Crittenden, pro Sc; at
torney, Pledger, jr.
In re Watson E. Coleman; attor-
neys, Colladay & Wallace-Watta-
wa; Shands.
Klein VS.. Brooks; attorneys, Lich-
tenberg-McAtee.
American Heating Engineering
Co. VS.. Boyd, ct al; attorneys, Shin
berg-Cobb, Howard & Hayes.
Wrathall VS.. Axelson Mfg. Co, ct
al; attorneys, Miller-SpieSs; Hill.
Laughlin VS.. Drury Realty Corp,
ct al attorneys. Laughlin-Corpor-
alton Counsel.
Combined Congregations of the
District of Columbia VS.. Dent; at
torneys, Miller-Corporation Coun-
sci.
Marathon VS.. Soldano: attorneys,
| Hornstein-Lyman.
Knox VS.. Portland Hotel Corp;
attorneys, Behrend; Halper-Mc-
Neil.
Hurwitz. etc, vs. Hurwitz; a,tor-
neys, Lichtenberg-Rardy
Thorrens VS.. ThorrenS, attorneys,
Observation-Disclosures.
Criminal Court No. 1-Justice
GoldsborOugh.
United States VS.. Gypsum.
Criminal Court No. 2-Justise
Morris.
Trials:
United States VS.. George H. Jack
son
United States VS.. Walter Cunning
ham.
United States VS.. Joseph Carty.
United States vs.. MOntce Bryant
United States vs.. Hugh J. Ford.
United States VS.. Charles Z. Smith.
United States VS.. John II. Hall.
United States vs.. Alton Rome.
United States vs.. Ruth Collins.
United States vs.. Richard B. Heck.
United States VS.. Henry H. Ropp.
Criminal Court No. 3-Ju5tice Let's.
Trials:
United States vs.. william T,
/ Swami.
United tSates VS.. Alexander J.
Bundy
United States vs.. Walter f. John
son, Douglas Freeman, Lewis Crew,
! Clarence Blackwell, James H Pow
| ell. Russell Bruce, Give Henderson
, and George Marshall,
i United States VS.. Mose Massey.
, United States vs.. Edward Afford
jr.. ana Isaac Bird.
United States vs.. Mary Johnson
ard Alice Jackson.
United States VS. Andrew Smith.
United States vs.. Olthea J. Wat
son. Charles E. Lampkin and Irving
L. West. 80.
United States VS.. Sam Wright
Mack Bell, Leroy jones and Monetta
Scott
United States VS.. Charlie L.
, Thomas.
Unitef States VS.. Charles Fletcher
UniteE States VS.. Nose Massey and
James +. School.
Jury Actions.
67l-Morgan VS.. Bunker: attor-
neys, NJ. F. Keogh-WilkeS. McGar-
raghy & Arts
Mo.-Can1eld VS.. Burke; attor-
, neys. Lawrence Koenigsberger, R. E
Wellford-G. E. Sullivan, j D. Fitz-
gerald, w. C, English, Hinton &
Heron, j. A. OShea
395-Crosby VS.. De FranceauX; at
torneys, w. B. Wolff. A Grant
44-DoWney VS.. Pennsylvania
: Greyhound Lines; attorneys, Max
Rhoade. Helen Sherry, Lester Wood
H I, Quinn.
, 250-Eierhart VS.. L. P. Stewart
5 Co.; attorneys, H. c. Wender, J
| C. Levy-N. C. Turnage, R. B. Ben
nett.
: 29l-Verrill VS.. Karavedes; attor-
, neys, M. F. keogh-V. V. Vaughan
116-Thomas VS.. De Saints; at
: torneys, William Wendell-Frederick
Stohlman, George Cassidy.
, 2l0-Leet vs.. Thomas Cook &
, Sons, Inc; attorneys. Gardiner
H. L. Davis-G. B. Martin.
. Admin re Estate of Mary F
Diggs; attorneys w. c. Murphy, L
. A. Block-A. w. Gray. T. L. Dodson
, 53-Lyche vs. Romm; attorneys, j.
j. Malloy-H. 1. Quinn.
162-Roberts VS.. Capital Transit
Co.; attorneys, J. J. Malloy-E. l.
:, Jones.
225-Giant Food Shopping Center
VS.. Liberty Mutual Life 1ns. Co.; at
torneys, Milton Strasburger, Irwin
Geiger-E L. Jones, Howard Boyd
87-Lust VS.. Kammerman ct al;
attorneys, Simon, Koenigsberger &
Young-E. L. Jones, Howard Boyd.
600-Papa VS.. B. & o. R. R. Co; at
i (See COURT ASSIGNMENTS,
= Page A-150
! Defense City Proposal