Evening star., 1941-11-04
DISTRICT COURT.

In any case where postponement
Of the hearing Of motion is to be
requested. notice should be given the
motions clerk not later than 2 O'Clock
the afternoon before such motior
Is set for hearing. It will be the
policy Of the court not to grant post
ponement II the aforesaid notice Is
not given. except when extraordi-
nary conditions have prevented the
giving Of such notice.
Roll call motions will be at 90
am, as heretofore has been the
practice.
Motions-Justice David A. Pine.
Assignments for tomorrow:
In re William C. Darwin; writ.
In re Carl G. Gilliland; writ.
May VS.. May; attorneys, Braguniel
-Merrick.
Peary vs.. Peary; attorneys, Your.
mas. Burton, Hef1elfinger-Fleming.
Knox VS.. Portland Hotel Corp; at.
torneys, AeineTsd, Halper-Mefeef:-
Jones VS.. Jones; attorneys, Hollo
vell-Callahan.
Davis vs.. Selma; attorneys, Hand
werk-Robeson.
Bourne VS.. Bourne ct al; aftof'
neys. Douglas, Obear & Campbell
Bastian, Chumbris.
Marathon VS.. Soldano; attorneys
Hornsteln-Lyman.
Martin ct al. VS.. Simms ct al; at.
torneys, Atkinson-Bischoff.
Hull VS.. Hull; attorneys, Kauf-
mann-McCormick.
Acadia Construction Corp. VS.
Saunders Co. ct al; attorneys. Hud-
son, Creyke g. Hudson-Ottenberg.
In re estate of James Albert Pot
ter; attorneys, Hugher, Balzer -
Wendell, Dunn.
Criminal Court No. 1-Justice
Goldsborough.
United States vs.. Gypsum.
Criminal Court No. 2-Justice
Morris.
Trials:
United States VS.. James L. Harris
United States VS.. Charles j. Bass
ham.
United States vs.. James e. Hall.
United States VS.. Arthur L. New
tin.
United States VS.. Charles E.
Smith.
United States VS.. Raymond Bar
rier.
Criminal Court No. 3-Justice Let's.
Trials:
United States VS.. Horace McCray.
United States VS.. Thursa J. Will
con.
United States vs.. George Wilson.
United States vs.. Lesse Cooper.
United States VS.. Benners Milli-
gan.
United States vs.. Eugene o. Epps
and Albert jackson.
United States VS.. Willie Land and
Julia johnson.
United States vs.. Orville Preston.
United States VS.. Mack Bullock.
Jury Actions.
Adv.-Commerce g. Savings Bank
vs.. Laughlin: attorneys, Leon Pretz-
felder-J. j. Laughlin.
73-Grif1th Consumer Co. vs.
Meadowbrook, Inc: attorneys, Frost
Myers & Towers-H. I. Quinn.
4+Downey VS.. Pennsylvania
Greyhound Lines; attorneys, Max
Rhoade; Helen Sherry; Lester Wood
III. I. Quinn.
225-Giant Food Shopping Center
vs.. Liberty Mutual Life Insurance
Co.: attorneys, Milton Strasburger
Irwin Geiger-E. L. Jones, Howard
Boyd.
79-Silverstein vs.. Welfare g. Rec
reational Association; attorneys
Abraham Chaifetz; D. K. Offutt-
e. L. Jones, Howard Boyd.
212, 163-Simon ct al. VS.. Hahn et
A.; attorneys, Austin Garfield;
Simon, Koenigsberger & Young
Tobriner, Graham Brez g. Tobriner
291-Verrill VS.. Karavades; attor'
neys, M. F. Keogh-V. v. Vaughan
2l5-Varner VS.. Henkel; attorneys
r. T. Lynch-C. w. Arth.
162-Roberts VS.. Capital Transit
Co.; attorneys, j. ]. Malloy-E. L
Jones.
53-I,vche VS.. Romm: attorneys
]. j. Malloy-H. I. Quinn.
114-Gates ct al. VS.. Meyer ct al;
attorneys, H. L. McCormick-V. O
Hill; Spencer Gordon; United
States attorney.
115-Gates ct al. VS.. Washington
Daily News ct al; attorneys, H. L
McCormick-Charles Walker; v. O
Hill; United States attorney; M. p
Friedlander.
243-Berkow ct al. VS.. Gill ct al;
attorneys, Milton Conn; A. l.. New
mysr; D. G. BresstC. s. Baker;
Benjamin Topper; Warren Magee;
L. G. Rainwater.