Evening star., 1941-02-03
DISTRICT COURT.

OF Jne nearing OF HlOIlOH ID W NC
requested, notice should be given
the motions clerk not later than
3 o'clock the afternoon before such
motion is set for hearing 1t will
be the policy of the court not TO
grant postponementS If the atore-
said notice is not given except when
extraordinary conditions have pre-
vented the giving of the notice.
Roll call of motions will be at
9:45 am, as heretofore has been
the practice.
Hereafter in all domestic relations
cases where temporary custody OF
child, or the fixing of temporary
maintenance for a wife or child is
sought, the procedure shall be by
motion, as required by the rules Of
court, and not by rules to show
cause
Motions-Justice T. Alan Colds
borough.
Assignments for Tuesday:
In re Abraham Jackson: writ.
Nagle VS.. Nagle; attorneys, Col
vin-Wilmeth.
Porter Gable Co. VS.. MINIS; rule.
Hanes VS. Morgenthau, Jr.; attor-
neys. Patterson-United States At
torney.
Haddaway VS.. Kass ct al; attor-
neys, Ginberg-Ottenberg; Ammer-
man
Hassen VS.. Welch; attorneys,
Downing-PoWen.
Beacon Sign Co., Inc, VS.. Babbitt
ct al; attorneys, Schwartz Chal-
fetz.
Sickles VS.. Army Navy Country
Club; attorneys, Geiger-Baker.
Mascero VS.. Mascero; attorneys,
! Turco-Wender
S Curley VS.. Curley; attorneys,
= Cusick-Ewing; Young.
S Forty-First Ward Building &
Loan VS. McHenry; attorneys, Bolo-
tin g. Brown; Shenos.
: Hsrdell VS. Freund; attorneys
7 Willcher-Friedman
In re Eppie G. Wigs; writ.
Jury Actions.
35-Penna. Drug Co. VS.. Cume-
. rich; attorneys, F. c. Brooke; D. L
!. Blanken-George D. Horning, jr.
j. A. Rafferty,; Leo A. Rover.
373-Borresen VS.. Ferguson; attor'
, neys, K D. Amick; G. L. Quinn
= French, Tompkins & Owens.
= Adv.-Brown VS.. Lincoln Theatel
Co.; attorneys, Josiah Lyman, Mel
- son Carver; r. L. Norris-Simon
Koenigsberger & Young.
6l8-Lanham VS.. Walker ct al
attorneys, c. L. De Orsey; Maurice
Friedman.
Slaughter VS.. Wenger; attor
neys, H. I. Quinn-E. L. Jones
Howard Boyd.
465-Kennedy ct al. VS.. Absher e
!, al; attorneys, D. K. Offutt; R. 1
q Merrick; Carlton Alm-N. c
E Turnage; E. L. Jones; Corporation
i Counsel.
545-Degges VS.. National Casualt
5 Co. ct al; attorneys, J. N. Halper-
Colladay g. McGarraghy.
Admin re Estate Of Edwar
Meagher; attorneys, w. E. Richard
son-L A. Block.
485-BrazeIton VS.. Alol; attorney
NeWmyer & BreSs-Frost, Myers 1
IS Towers, H A. Grant.
505-McConaty VS.. Shapero; at
torneys, Swingle e. Swingle-H.
II Quinn.
I. 182-Dixon VS.. General Taxi Ct
e ct al; attorneys, William wendell
v Leo Schlosberg, A. L. Bennett, H.
e Quinn, Frank Paley.
o 319-Harman VS.. Welfare Recrea
e tional Association; attorneys, H. +
o Bettelman, w. H. Bastian-E. I
Jones, George Monk, Arthur Phelar
Is l54-Ganoung VS.. Holland; attor
It neys, 3. ]. Gallagher; A. F. Adams
r. r. L. TedroW,
= 86-WilliamS VS.. Maselas; attor
e neys, I. H Halpern-Simon, KoenigS
If berger & Young.
5; Sullivan VS.. Hellman; attol
e, neys. L. P. Walsh-Simon, Koenig'
berger e. Young.
st 237-Prince VS.. SileSky: attorney
is William Wendell-Simon, Koenig!
berger & Young.
s, 345-Wilkins VS.. Apex Hair
l. News Co.; attorneys, Houston
~ Houston-Cobb, Howard & Hayes.
a 130--Nicolson VS.. Brown ,et al: q
a torneys, Hamilton & Hamilton; H.
l. Gower-Newmyer & Bress; c.
e. Jones; James Crouch.
+ 509-Offutt. ct al. VS. Bridgman,
III al; attorneys, Newmyer & Bress-
ID Nesbit g. Pledger; J. M, Conroy.
lp 349-White VS.. Capital Transit CO
IN H Wise Kelly.
;e 604-Borden VS.. Condit; attorney
z. D. Borden-H. I. Quinn.
615-Wiggins, ct al. VS.. Capt.
'e Transit Co.; attorneys, T. M. Bak,
!, H Wise Kelly: r. E. L. Goff.
i 629-Jalepes, ct al. VS.. Tucker,
Us al; attorneys, Newmeyer e. Bress-
L L. NJ. Shinberg.
654-Hall, ST. VS.. David, ct al
IN attorneys. C. M. Weidemeyer-'
ne M David.
"a 397-Crawford. Admr. VS. Nolan
ct al; attorneys, Edm. Hill, jr-
es N Halper
~ 275-Mathews VS.. Downey: alto
as neys, L. J. Heller; Harry Fliedner,
e M M. Doyle.
lg 802-Dicianno VS.. Service Parl
ne ing Co.. attorneys, ]. F. Reilly;
E. Martino-H l. Quinn.
o. 554-Grable VS.. Virginia Staj
ae Lines, Inc; attorneys, D. E, Clarl
-, H. I. Quinn.
tn 639-Kaminskv vs Canita1 Tra1
le sit Co.; attorneys, Abe. Chaifetz
ar E. L. Jones.
664-Huer VS.. Pennsylvania r.
u Co.; attorneys, Rowland Edwards
le r. A. Bogley.
rs 2456-McNulty VS.. United State
Ia attorneys, Fennen & Lamar Uni
ed States Attorney.