The Waterbury Democrat., 1941-08-26

tO tAAC AesNCt AGCONA, oAAC6A0$A9i @@~St back and right hand. Held respon- sible for the accident is the claim that the rails were oily and greasy, causing the cars to move too swift ly, and the contention that no prop CT safeguards were provided.
 Injured I'm Fall
 In another $10,O00 suit, Alice Aus tin of Watertown charges Giovanni Buonanno, Waterbury, with failing to make promised repairs on sec- ond floor veranda of house be- longing to him on Norway street, Watertown. As result of this negligence, 1t is claimed, the Aus tin woman, 8 tenant in the build ing since October, 1886, was thrown to the ground when the flooring and supports gave way, sustaining fractures involving both bones of the lower leg, and body contusjons. The fall occurred on July 30, 1940.
 Two $10,000 actions were filed by persons allegedly suffering hurts in falls in the identical locality. Clyde H. Libby and Helen Adamski, both of Waterbury, bring separate acc tionS against the City of Water bury, Lewis s. Reed and Louis N. Raffel, both of Waterbury, for in juries sustained in falls on the sidewalk fronting B 35 Albert Place. The latter two defendants, owners of the property, are accused of maintaining an unsafe, broken and dangerous condition of the pavement. Libby charges that his fall at this place on May 30, 1941, resulted in fractures of the ribs; and Helen AdamSki, who allegedly fell on January 25 of this year, claims to have suffered knee con- tusionS.
 Frederick R. Gibbs, Waterbury, brings suit for $7,500 against Frank Giglio, also of this city, alleging that on July l, 1941. while he was standing on East Main street, Gig lio approached and struck him with his fist. He sustained compound fracture of the right mandible as a result of the assault, it is claimed.
 Suing for the same amount is Mary DziengielewSlSi, who accuses the Borough of Naugatuck with maintaining an unsafe, improper and defective condition of the side- walk at Trowbridge Place. The plaintiff charges that & fall in that locality on February 2, 1941, caused an inguinal abscess, necessitating surgical operation, and resulted in persistent weakness and disability.
 PrOmissory Note
 Walter Perry, Bank Commission CT, and successor receiver for the Merchants Trust CO, defunct Wa terbury banking house, asks $3,O00 of Margaret Moran, Naugatuck, and Edward F. Moran of Elmhurst, L. I. Perry alleges that on April 1, 1925, the Moran woman executed 8 $S,0O0 promissory note to the Merchait's Trust Co., secured by property on Moran street, $1,91O of which is still unpaid. On July 25, 1884, the property was transferred to the son, Edward, with the inten- tion, it is contended, of hindering. delaying and defrauding creditors. This action, the complaint states, was knowingly abetted by Edward Moran. The plaintiff requests an order nullifytng the conveyance.
 A $2,OO0 loan made by Mary N. Varcellos of New Milford to Arn- old Olivaira, Waterbury, on August 5. 194l, which has not been re- paid, Is the basis of suit in which the plaintiff claims damages uf $2,5OO.
 William N. Giampetruzd, tavern proprietor at 38 Scovill street, ap- pealS the revocation of his per- init to sell alcoholic beverages by the state Liquor Control Commis- sion. The license was revoked on June 1. 194l, on a charge that the tavern-keeper sold alcoholic liquor other than permitted under 8 tav- ern permit. The appellant claims that the commission acted in an unreasonable and arbitrary man. ner, and that he was not guilty of illicit selling.