davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Detroit evening times. (Detroit, Mich) 1921-1958, 1941-07-31

WHILE WE have spoken Of II
before. from our recent mail we
believe it might be a good idea
10 say something about super
fluouS hair. Girls and women
write TO ask for help in re-
moving this nuisance and all of
them say they are embarrassed
over the condition.
II does embarrass one 10 be
so afflicted but there is no criti-
cism for any one who may have
these unwelcome fuZzers. We
can't tell you why they grow
either but as near as most au-
thorities come 10 the answer is
that il is just an improper dis
tribution OF the growth Of the
hair.
Detroit evening times. (Detroit, Mich) 1921-1958, 1941-07-31

The point is 10 get rid Of
them. The only permanent re-
lief is by electrolysis but there
are temporary treatments such
as wax, friction, shaving and
the depilatories.
So far as we know, none Of
the manufacturers advise the
use OF depilatories for the face
but we do know thousands Of
women use them and find them
quite satisfactory. There are
some who find them injurious so
lc advised by the directions on
the package or your own beauty
operator.
Evening star., 1941-06-17

2703-Braun ct al. VS.. Wueger ct
al: attorneys. Gardiner, Earnest g.
Gardiner-Garnett g. Beach.
2705-Moy VS.. Moy; attorneys, F.
j. Kelly-Joseph Di Leo.
2708-Leishaer VS.. Leishear; at
torneys, Fred Wilson,. A. Sargent.
2711-Kojouharoff VS.. Kojouhar-
off: attorneys, Charles Pergler; F. l..
Shigo-A. F. Garfield; r. w. Cali
her.
2712-Gordon VS.. Gordon; attor-
neys, r. L. Merrick-J. P. Marshall.
2717-Brown VS.. Brown; attorneys,
M. E. Buckley-Ray Neudecker.
2722-Goins VS.. Coins; attorneys,
S. G. Lichtenberg-Joseph Di Leo.
2727-Kotch VS.. Kotch; attorneys,
Gowen g. Fitzpatrick-H. c. De
Lozier.
2726-Brennan VS.. Jackson, adrm.,
ct al; attorneys, D. c. Eberly-R. L.
Merrick; T. S. Jackson.
Jury Actions.
2326-Cunningnam VS.. Kraft ct
al; attorneys, o. D. Branson-S. j.
L'Hommedieu; Jerome Clarke IN
P. P.
Inu.-Jackson ct al. VS.. Clarke;
attorneys, j. B. Gunion-"none."
Inq.-Clarke VS.. Evans; attorneys,
plaintiff in P. P.-"none."
16l1-Raymond ct al. VS.. Horton
Motor Lines; attorneys, Michael F.
Keogh-H. I. Quinn.
342-Wagner VS.. National Delivery
Association; attorneys, j. P. Dono-
vans. M. Boyd; r. H. Yeatman;
Milton Kronheim, jr.; R. E. Lynch
Admin re estate Of Nils Chal-
mers; attorneys, Hymand Gold
stein-Jacob N. Halper.
1407-Harris VS.. Capital Transit
Co.: attorneys, w. E. Leahy; E. B.
Sullivan; Newmyer & Bress-E. l..
JC s: H. w. Kelly.
z-5O-Young VS.. Foley Dog Show;
attorneys, Newmyer & Bress-
Swingle & SWingle.
1532-Pearl VS.. Thompson Co.; at
torneys, R. A. Cusick-Swingle &
Swingle; WEIGH, Daily & WEIGH.
2773-Mahoney VS.. Pitcher ct al;
attorneys, R. w. McMahon-Louis
Gutenberg; Wilbur Gray; w. C.
Murphy; I. B. Yochelson; Jacob N.
Halper.
2043-Young VS.. I. T. o. A. ct al;
attorneys, S. P. Smith,. j. Wilson.
2198-Cock VS.. Naylor; attorneys
James ODonnell; J. F. Reilly-H. K
Presley; P. B. Ennis.
2219-Powers VS.. Capital Transit
Co.: attorneys, Smith & Edwards
H. Wise Kelly; R. E. l.. Goff.
Opt Ray VS.. Potomac River
Lines; attorneys, Charles Walker
A. K. Shipe.
2344-Macklin VS.. Bildman at
torneys, Max Ostrow: Maurice
Friedman-Irvin Goldstein.
431-Hill VS.. Capital Transit Co.;
attorneys, D. H. Offutv-E. l.. Jones;
Howard Boyd.
1222-Patterson VS.. Leo Rocca
Inc; attorneys. D. K. Offutt-Frost
Evening star., 1941-06-17
1900 Leave Fort Meade
On 2-Day Training Trip
By the Associated Press.

By the Associated Press.
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md.
June 17.-More than 1900 men of
the 29th Division left today on
two-day movement to Camp Ritchie,
Cascade, Md They will bivouac
there for the night, returning to
Fort Meade tomorrow.
Under command of 1t. Col. John
Nash, commanding officer of the
l76th Field Artillery, the motorized
column included the 176th, head
quarters and one company of the
l21st Engineers Regiment and a
detachment of the 29th Military
Police.
1t. Col. Carey Jarman, division
plans and training officer, said the
movement would give the units con-
voy and field training equivalent to
that being received by combat teams.
The outfits generally are under divi-
sion headquarters control on the
field and are not members of COM
bat teams.
Evening star., 1941-06-17
Court ASSIGNMENTS

neys, j. G. Dondero; j. P. Labofish-
J. Weeda.
2649-Thompson VS.. Thompson
attorneys, c. H. Housten-L. w
Caine.
2652-King VS.. King: attorneys
L. A. Block-W. B. Mccarthy.
2654-Corman VS.. German: attor.
neys, N M. Lubar-A. l.. Newmyer;
David Hornstein.
2208-Kennedy VS.. Kennedy; at.
torneys. S. NJ Boyd-Newmyer &
Shapiro.
1974-Guyan VS.. Guyan; attor.
neys, Milton Kaplan-F. B. Potter.
1930-Layton VS.. Layton; attor-
neys, C. S. Rhyne-H. K. Bryan.
2218-Doney VS.. Doney: attorneys
M. A Ostrow-George Wilmeth.
15OO-Ferguson VS.. Ferguson; at.
torneys, Leon Sclawy-Samue
Brown.
2375-Wilson VS.. Newhard; attor.
neys, N. Friedenberg-L. Koenigs.
berger.
2400-Wells VS.. billiard; attorneys
John Gardiner-William F.. Martin
2647-Munsey Trust Co. VS.. Wood
attorneys, r. H. Yeatman-Kur
Riemer.
Evans VS.. Evans; attorneys, N. A
Dobbins-A. j. Howard.
Adv.-United States VS.. Belt: at
torneys, Alexander Bell-W. E
Richardson.
Adv.-McLachlen VS.. Lumberman'.
Mutual Casualty Co.; attorneys, c
D. Garrett-C. E. Pledger.
2063-Courtney VS.. Worth; attor.
neys, Louis Ottenberg-L. j. Ganse
2374-Langley VS.. Simpson g. Co.;
attorneys, ]. J. O'Brien-H. I. Quinn
2214-Beaton Co. VS.. Berberich;
attorneys, A. ]. Hilland-Toomey &
Toomey.
1331-City Bank VS.. Brisker; at
torneys, L. M. Tulman-L M. Shin
berg.
2661-Tatum VS.. Tatum; attorneys
j. A. Dondero-J. T. Bonner.
2662-Washington VS.. Washing
ton: attorneys, William Wendell
G. j. Boden: Robert Escher.
2666-Branzell VS. Branzell; attor-
neys, J. H. McCoole-F. L. Shigo.
2669-Arnold & Arnold: attorneys
A. K. Johnson-J. K. Keane.
2671-Kern VS.. Kern; attorneys
Newmyer & Shapiro-Wilkes & Ar
tis.
2673-Willner VS.. Hazen ct al; at
torneys, Plaintiff in P. P.-V. E
West.
2675-Weidman VS.. Weidman: at
torneys, Marie McCathran-J. M
Boardman.
2682-Hanley & Hanley; attor-
neys, w. A. Gallagher-H. S. Eiland
2685-Pry VS.. Pry; attorneys, H
L. Mccormick: C. L. Stout-Mar-
shall, McGroary & Keesee.
2689-Weaver VS.. Mokalis; attor'
neys, w. c. Burton-J. c. Suraci.
2690-Berry VS.. Berry; attorneys
Eli Grubic-P. F. Biggins.
269l-Rainey VS.. Rainey; attor.
neys, Alonzo Ware-T. j. Flynn.
2692-Burger VS.. Burger; attor.
neys, Lindas & Bradley-Joseph D
Leo.
2696-Keranen VS.. Keranen; at.
torneys, Myer Pumps-R. F. Down.
ing.
2699-Mattingly VS.. Mattingly
attorneys, F. B. Rhodes-A. A. Lips.
comb.
Evening star., 1941-06-17
Myers e. Towers.


2l93-Gates ct al. VS.. Meyer ct al;
attorneys, H. L. Mccormick; c. L.
Stout-V. C. Hill; Spencer Gordon
j. w. Fihelly.
2l94-Gates ct al. VS.. Washington
Daily News; attorneys, H. L. Nc
Cormick-Charles Walker; Mark
Friedlander; v. o. Hill; John FL
helly.
1275-Lyche VS.. Domm; attorneys,
j. j. Malloy-H. I. Quinn.
692-Levine VS.. Washington Termi-
nal Corp; attorneys, Lester Wood
Hamilton & Hamilton.
1916, 1547-Gardiner VS.. B. & o.
r. r Co.; attorneys, VIM. A. Gal
lagher-Hamilton & Hamilton.
Adv.-Employers Liability Co. VS..
Moss Realty Co.; attorneys, F. H.
Myers-C. H. Doherty; C. M. Weide-
meyer.
1929, 2285-Cunningham VS.. Hop
kins; attorneys, D. K. Offutt-G. w.
Arth.
1053-Downey VS.. Penna. Grey
hound Lines; attorneys, H. S.
Rhoade-H. I. Quinn.
1590-Barrett VS.. Davis ct al; at
torneys, H. I. Quinn-E. L. Jones.
1728-Mills VS.. Whelan Drug Co.:
attorneys, A. M. Schwartz; Samuel
Friedman-E. L. Jones; Jos. J. Cot
ter.
1914-Clements VS.. Capital Transit
Co.; attorneys. T. L. Dodson-E. L.
Jones; Howard Boyd
1554-Nash VS.. Virginia Stage
Lines; attorneys, H. c. Allder-H.
Quinn.
1692-Goffney VS.. Freeman ct al.
attorneys, w. T. Hannan-Welch
Daily & WEIGH.
2233, 2844-Loren & Crane VS.
Good Bros; attorneys, Michael F
Keogh, C. H. Doherty-George
ZeutiuS: c. G. Collins.
Evening star., 1941-06-17
Alleged zapp Letter
Complains U. 5. Press
Won't Buy Ndzi News
Head Of Trunsoceon
Service Tells Berlin His
Troubles in Letter
By the Associated Press.

BY the Associated Press.
NEW YORK, June 1.-THE New
York Herald Tribune printed today
letter it said DR.. Manfred Zapp,
director of the TranSocean News
Service, wrote to the German For
eign Office describing his efforts to
induce the American press to accept
reports of the German news agency
and complaining that his Difficult
ties were enough to drive one to
desperation"
The TranSocean News Service, a
German agency with no United
States connections, was ordered
closed yesterday in the presidential
order directing the German En-
bsssy to close consulates and other
German agencies. DR.. zapp has
been detained at Ellis Island since
May 7 on a Federal indictment
charging violation of the act requir-
ing registration of all agents of for
eign principals.
The letter, purportedly written
October II, 1899, to Guenther Alien
burg of the Foreign Office in Berlin,
was among documents held by the
Dies Committee Investigating Un-
American Activities.
II offered this Transocean news
to the American press only to meet
with the stiffest resistance every
where" the letter said. Better than
any other press in the world the
American press is informed OF for
eign political affairs in Europe
through its own regular correspond
ents as we'll as through the we'll
known large news agencies
Americans hold the peculiar sub
jective notion that only they are
objective and consequently they will
not read news that does not sail
under their own flag. They are avid
for news, but it must come from
American sources"
The letter urged Berlin to pro-
vide Transocean with more exclu-
sive news" than was available to
American neWspapermen in Berlin
in order to develop Transocean serv-
ice in America.
According to the letter, DR.. Zapp
said he experienced almost no sue
cess in selling Transocean news even
in German circles in this country.
Evening star., 1941-06-17

199-Tully VS.. Washington Prop
critics, Inc; attorneys, w. E. Leahy;
E. B. Sullivan-Peele, Lesh, Drain
& Barnard; C. w. Arth.
2-Washington Securities Co.
VS.. Russell; attorneys, Michael F.
Keogh- Gardiner, Earnest & Gar
! diner.
2779, 231O-Wright e. Williams VS..
Mundy Motor Lines; attorneys,
Joseph J. Malloy-Clephane, Lati-
mer & Hall.
2314HMankin VS.. Fitzhugh; at
torneys, Lambert e. Hart-W. C.
Burton.
1467-Tatro VS.. Powell; attorneys,
G. E. Taylor-C. E. Pledger, jr.
2214-Crosthwai VS.. Curtis; at
torneys, P. j. Sedgwick-Newmyer g.
Bress; Frank Paley.
2425-ODonneH VS.. Sager ct al; /;
| attorneys, Minor, Galley g. Drury-
w. M. Bastian; corporation counsel.
2426-Kogak VS.. Yellow Cab Co.;
attorneys, Newmyer & Bress-A. M.
Schwartz.
2018-Petty VS.. Y. w. G. A; at
torneys, M. F. Keogh-Frost, Myers
| & Towers.
2428-O'Connor VS.. District of Co
lumbia; attorneys, Louis Rothschild;
E. E. Ditto-corporation counsel.
2445-Harris VS.. Seek; attorneys,
F. L. Neubeck; Joseph Cavanaugh;
j. OConnell-Arthur Hilland.
| 1880-Boss ct al. VS.. District of
Columbia; attorneys. w. C. Sulli-
van-corporation counsel.
| 2677-Jenkins VS.. Jelleff, Inc; at
torneys, Douglas, Obear & Camp
bell-Swingle & Swingle.
2697-Ginberg VS.. Carpet: attor-
neys, Louis Ginberg-J. B. Danzan-
sky.
2706-Leet VS.. Thomas Cook &
Sons, Inc, attorneys, Gardiner,
Earnest & Gardiner; H. L. Davis
l G. B. Martin.
Evening star., 1941-06-17
Mackenzie King Receives
Decree From Princeton
Ry the Associated Press.

Rv the Associated Press.
PRINCETON, N. j., June IT,
Canada and the United States shall
forever walk together as the best
of good neighborS," Prime Minister
Mackenzie King said today as he
received an honorary degree at
Princeton University.
Between you and U.s." he said,
there is a community of thought,
ideal and purpose"
The university also conferred an
honorary degree on Crown Princess
Juliana of the Netherlands who
took up residence in Canada after
her country had been occupied by
the Nazis.
Mr.. Mackenzie King told the
graduating class that Canada and
the United States have sought the
same ends, atd he saw today's cere-
mony as commemorating "our COM
mon disdain of the fleeting things
that will pass and our common love
of the eternal things that will
remain. ="
Evening star., 1941-06-17
Criminal Court No. 2-JuStice
AdkinS
Criminal Court No. 3-Justice Let's
United States VS.. Liskin ct al.

NOn-Jury Actions.
2048-Walden ct al. VS.. Guthrie;
attorneys, J. J. Hayden-R. A.
Cusick.
24l3-Occidental Hotel VS.. Schun-
dler; attorneys, E. E. Cummins;
Danny Hughes-Ira Kaehne; Pick
ems Neagle.
Mo.-Lentholtz VS.. Ickes; attor-
neys. J. J. Hayden-Mr. Edelstein.
Adv.-Goshorn VS.. Goshorn; at
torneyS, l.. H. Dopp-L. Yebowitz.
89-Holtzman VS.. Hoffman; at
torneys, S. G. Ingham-W. M.
Hoffman
147-BrouSsard VS.. BrouSsard; at
torneys, w. D. Hollowell-Ellis
Klein.
572-Jones VS.. Jones; attorneys,
Ray Neudecker-N. M. Baker.
Adv.-Nolan VS.. Greyhound Lines,
Inc; attorneys, w. E. Leahy; N.
Chiascione-H. L. Quinn; R. w.
Galiher.
Mo-Dairymen's League Corp. vs.
Wickard; attorneys, Bowdoin Craig
hill-John Yost.
17O8-Flythe VS.. Flythe; attor-
neys, D. K. Offutt-J. M. Board
man.
Adv.-Smith VS.. Washington Bot
ting Works; attorneys, Raymond
Gittelman-John Maktos.
Guard-In re Susie Allen; attor-
neys, G. H. Houston-B. v. Lawson,
jr.
Adv.-Gorewitz ct al. VS.. Hundley
ct al; attorneys, Henry Gilligan,
J. A. Crooks-Charles Houston.
495-Wyatt VS.. Wyatt; attorneys,
Raymond Gittelman-Milton Conn.
Adv.-Smith VS.. Smith; attorneys,
R. A. Cusick-D. L. Riordan.
2121-Garrett VS.. Garrett; attor-
neys, Ray Neudecker-Edw. Berger.
2235-Keehn VS.. Keehn: attor-
neys, Thomas Scalley-Paul De-
laney.
2280-Brisco VS.. Brisco; attorneys,
B. T. Sanders-Andrew Howard.
2290-Hinkle VS.. Hinkle; attor-
neys. Ellis Klein-Jos. Bulman; N.
c. Turnage.
2292-Gregory VS.. Gregory; at
torneys, Ray Neudecker - Paul
Jameson.
2293-Holford VS.. Holford; attor-
neys, w. w. Dosh-J. NJ Boardman.
2294-Pike VS.. Pike; attorneys,
G. L. DaWSon-Ray Neudecker.
2295-Hoover VS.. Hoover; attor-
neys, Ray Neudecker-T. o. Nichols.
O-Machezie VS. Machezie; at
torneys, Soterios, Nicholson-Jos,
Bonuso.
2303-White VS.. White; attorneys
Jos. j. Malloy-D. L. Grantham.
1630-Fletcher VS.. Fletcher; attor-
neys, Joseph D. Di Leon. S,
BoWles.
2331-Maloney VS.. Maloney; attor-
neys, Ray Neudecker-H. M. Fowler
2366-Penn VS.. Penn; attorneys
G. B. Gunion-M. T. Woodruff.
2382-Hawkins VS.. Hawkins; at
torneys, L. w. Caine-H. A. Dyson.
2396-Crane VS.. Crane; attorneys,
S. P. Smith-A. A. Lipscomb.
24O1-Stringfellow VS.. Stringfel-
low; attorneys, C. D. Artis-B. v
Lawson, jr.
24O6-Harrison VS.. Harrison; at
torneys, B. V. Lawson-Clyde Free
man.
2422-Feber VS.. Feber; attorneys.
Lambert g. Hart-N. Lee Ball.
243O-Lynch VS.. Lynch; attorneys
F. ]. Donohue-J. B. Flaherty.
2431-Krieger VS.. Krieger; attor-
neys Norman & Sandler-R. H
McNeill.
2439-Clodfelter VS.. Clodfelter; at
torneys, S. P. Smith-Ben Lindas.
2441-Haynes VS.. Haynes; attor-
neys, Dolores Murray-M. G. Ehr-
Itch
2452-Dulay VS.. Dulay: attorneys
James Shenos-E. M. Fonbuena;
Marie McCathran.
2578-Thornton VS.. Thornton; at
torneys, S. H. Robeson-W. M. Shea
2648-Amanti VS.. Amanti: attor-
Evening star., 1941-06-17
26 Begin Taking Tests
For 'Rejectees' Camp
By the Associated Press.

6y the AnSOClhltu ILcoS
DURHAM, N. c., June 17-Twen-
ty-six youths rejected by selective
service officials for physical defects
began taking physical examinations
here today for admittance to the
first camp in the United States to
be established for "rejectees."
The camp will be operated by the
National Youth Administration on
an experimental basis. If it is sue
cessful, similar camps are planned
throughout the country.
Monday, when the camp formally
opens, the youths will begin courses
in physical training and instruction
to fit them for work in defense in
dustries when they are released.
They will get $35 a month, main
tenance and medical and dental
service.
Evening star., 1941-06-17
Continued From Page 2-xD

attorneys, Lamar; Sullivan; Koons-
Gutenberg; Guy.
Hardell VS.. Freund; attorneys,
Willcher-Friedman.
williams VS.. Maselas; attorneys,
Halpern-Simon, Koenigsberger g.
Young.
Busby & Lowrey VS.. Electric Util-
tiles Employees Union; attorneys,
Busby-Adams.
johnson VS. Hamilton National
Bank ct al; attorneys, Lubar-Gor-
don; Ward.
Baden VS. Baden; attorneys, Nc
Cathran-O'Brien.
Criminal Court No. 1--Justice
GoldsbOr0ugh.
Lunacy hearing:
United States VS.. George H. An
derson.
Trials:
United States VS.. James l..
Vaughan.
United States VS.. Albert B. Ham,
ilton.
United States VS.. Floyd Manley.
United States VS.. Thomas Barnes.
United States VS.. Asa Hugh Will
son.
United States VS.. Joseph P. Eagan,
William l.. Kehl and Asa G. Saule.
United States VS.. Rose Regina
Brooks and Edward L. Harper.
Criminal Court No. 2-JuStice
Adkins.
Trials:
United States VS.. Evelyn M. Stew
art.
United States VS.. Mary Elizabeth
Sibley.
Evening star., 1941-01-28
Susan Be Smooth!

your lipstick Will always look eE-
actly right" because it has been
chosen with the whole picture in
mind.
Nov you are rely 20 apply which
ever el.ade OF lipStick you have Sc
lcc,ad.
Most important. take your time in
putting it on. A very good thing to
have is a npstick pencil. which is
made of lipstick in a harder FORM
and sharpened just as a pencil is,
to a firm point. With this it is much
easier to draw the first firm lines of
your mouth, and then you can easily
fill in this outline with your regular
npStick. Make a mouth that is nat
ural, not distorted. Don't draw a
pout. a cupid's bow or cannibal lips.
Draw. in general. the mouth nature
gave you :. but it's no sin to i'm
prove it with a few well chosen
strokes. For example, if your mouth
is too big don't cover the whole
territory with lipstick. If you have
nothing but a fine. straight line to
start with. eXaggerate little And
when you've drawn the finished
product, take off the excess by biting
L piece of cleasing tissue between
your lips. To make your lipstick
more indelible, dust little powder
over your mouth and then moisten
your lips
The last touches on we'll
groomed face are made after a good
look in a well-Ighted mirror If
you are applying makeup for eve
ming :. in which case you'll prob
ably add a shade more rouge e.
look at yourself in the bright light
your beau will see you. If this is
daytime makeup. don't study it by
electric light. All this is common
sense, of course but how many
of US remember to use common sense
when Tom and Jerry are waiting
downstairs?
Tomorrow: FIFTEEN MINUTES
A DAY.
Evening star., 1941-01-28
BY NpU Giles

~ 4'tf 'FtS.
At last We are ready for our i'm
portant spot Of color in the face
iipstlck. While rouge should be Worn
Sparinglv, Hpstick should be applied
generously. Of course We don't mean
that YOU should overdo it . but
just let yourself 60 a little!
And because your lirs.iCk is the
most important CC!Cr emphasis in
your face, it should be carefully
chosen to 0c in harmony with your
skin tone and your costume color,
and of course to blend with perfectly
or match exactly the color of your
nail enamel. All lipstick colors are
dominated by one of the three pri-
mary ColorS: Clear red, blue or
yellow. Never attempt contrast, but
always strive for harmony, in the
color of lipstick you choose. For ex-
ample, don't wear blush or pur-
plish lipstick with a dress in the
rust or yellow tones. Wear clear,
bright red only with stark white.
black or clear red itself Wear it
with dark navy blue only if the navy
has no purple cast otherwise, a
lipstick with a purplish tone (which
IS a lipstick with a dominance of
blue) would be much more in har-
mony. Wear lipstick with a DOM
inant blue tone, under which come
all the purple lipsticks, of course,
with colors which are also domi-
nantly blue; and yellow lipsticks, by
which we mean the rust tones, with
all colors dominantly yellow. This
range includes yellow, rust, olive and
chartreuse, and also brown. Remem-
her this simple rule of harmony and
Evening star., 1941-01-28
Bv Barbara Bell.

This dress is admirably designed
to fatter women's sizes, with clever
bodice detailing that gives high
bustline. slim, paneled skirt and in
side tucks in front that fatten the
diaphragm and diminish the waist.
And it's a suave, lovely thing-so
slick and sophisticated in line, with
just enough softness so that you can
wear 1t for afternoons as we'll as for
runabout. Wear a brooch at the
flattering deep V of the neckline. a
flower corsage, or a brilliant clip.
You can always make basic dress
like this look different, from time
to time, by varying your jewelry.
Make this up in wide-spaced silk
print, in spun rayon or fiat crepe.
Wear it to your next club meeting
and see if people don't think you've
lost a few pounds! It's easy to
make. A step-by-step sew chart
comes with your design.
Barbara Bell Pattern No. l97l-B is
designed for sizes "a, SO, 38, 40, AZ, "A
and 46. Size 36 requires 4 yards OF
Evening star., 1941-01-28
Dorothy Dix Says go
There Is Nothing a Wife Can Do
About Philanderins Husband

Dear Dolothy Dix: In the sum-
mer my husband goes to another
city for additional study work, where
he invariably has an affair with
some young woman similarly en-
gagged, although he tells her he is
married. Of course, he says that he
has never loved any one but me
and would not marry one of them
even if he were free, as he has no
respect for any woman he can make
a fool Of. nor would he trust one
who was so weak as to fall for him,
and that any woman who would
crawl at his feet to get him has too
much of the yellow cur in her nature
to interest him.
I have given up trying to cure
him, but is there any way that l
can stop these young women from
deliberately trying to take another
woman's husband away from her?
Would a public horsewhipping at
the hands of an irate wife bring
them to their senses, as no loyalty
or respect for the feelings of the
parents they are obligated to seems
to appeal to them?
AN IRATE WIFE.
AnSWer-It is. perhaps, natural
that a wife whose husband is un-
faithful to her should lay the blame
for it ON the other woman. 1t saves
her face to believe that an intelli-
gent. experienced, middle-aged man
of the world is such a guileless baby
that he really doesn't understand
that he is being naughty when he
steals kisses from every pretty girl
he meets. and that he is so un-
sophisticated and trusting that any
little nitWit of a deb can involve
him in an affair without his suspect
ing it.
The wives of many philanderers
who thus try to befool themselves
write ME asking if they shall go
to their husbands current lady loves
and, on their bended knees, beg
them to give them back their hus-
bands. To this I answer no with
all the earnestness I can command.
I entreat them not to humiliate
themselves. 1t will be to no avail.
For the woman who is having an
affair with a married man knows
all that the wife can say about her