davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Detroit evening times. (Detroit, Mich) 1921-1958, 1941-03-03
j. ). Near War,
Bankers Told
Continued from Page One)
you have my respect for your
courage, not your judgment"


With a direct reference TO De-
troit's automobile industry. he re-
ported that auto sales in Britain
slumped from 27.783 in the first
seven months of 1899 to 4.310 in
the like period of 1910. Only per-
sons of national importance are
allowed 10 buy cars there now, he
said.
CITES THREE PROBLEMS
As in Germany and Britain. we
face three problems. ne said. They
arc:
How to finance our under
takings.
e-ffow TO keep prices down.
How TO keep labor costs down
without hardship.
Some form of dictatorship is the
alternative to concerted patriotic
sacrifices by all the people. Pope
warned.
Manufacturers In this coun-
try have already done mar
velous job of keeping prices
down." he said. I'VE sometimes
hear that labor has not taken
the same attitude, but we are
not told of the extent to which
labor has co-operated,- because
that's not news"
WOULD PROTECT LABOR
Pope said that labor was patri-
otto despite evidence TO the con-
trary. in a few isolated cases, and
should be- protected.
He pointed out that any country
which enters war OF its own ac-
cord TO fight a defensive war is
stupid.
ANY person that thinks we
can fight this war without an
AEF thinks We are too weak for
victory" he said.
Detroit evening times. (Detroit, Mich) 1921-1958, 1941-03-03
MUST WITHDRAW DEMANDS

The local governments in Ber-
muda, Trinidad and Jamaica are
being told by the British govern
ment that they must instruct
their representatives in London
10 withdraw the demands, which
the United States regards as pre-
poSterous.
London's action also follows a
formal communication from this
government to Great Britain serv-
ing notice that the American
negotiators in London would not
even be allowed to discuss the
demands presented by the colonial
representatives.
These demands were included in
an agenda presented to the Ameri-
can negotiators by the British
colonial representative soon after
the conference started in London
several weeks ago. The demands
were of such a far-reaching nature
and so obviously designed as a
get rich quick : scheme for the
British colonials that the Ameri-
can egoti ators were dumb
founded and Immediately cabled
Washington for instructions.
OBJECT TO SITES
The British colonials wanted 10
charge tariff duties on American
goods sent to the American bases,
wanted exorbitant prices for
private property sold to the
United States government in con-
nection with the bases, and they
wanted joint jurisdiction over the
bases
Local authorities in Bermuda
originally objected 10 the sites
picked out by the American naval
mission because they feared il
would interfere with yachting.
They also raised the question of
American naval and military au-
thorities using trucks on the
leased property because no auto
mobiles are allowed in Bermuda.
They indicated plainly that they
feared establishment of the bases
meant AmericaniZation of Ber-
muda and they didn't like it. re-
gardless of whether the British
Empire was fighting for its life or
not.
The Trinidad authorities OBJ
iected 10 the site selected by the
American mission because they
feared it might interfere with
their b athing beaches. They
wanted the United States TO con-
struet an artificial naval base in
a swampland area, and to pay q
pretty price for the privilege OF
doing so.
Detroit evening times. (Detroit, Mich) 1921-1958, 1941-03-03
LEARN FIRE FIGHTING

They will be taught how to
douse incendiaries, combat land
bombs and extract embedded de-
layed action bombs such as the
one which recently plowed into the
ground near London's Westmin-
ster Abbey.
Experts also will instruct ARP
workers in safeguarding against
poison gas.
Soon Windsor may have Bor-
der City's adaptation of London S
screaming banshee. the siren
which sounds air raid alarms.
Although no alarm system for
Windsor has been decided upon. il
Is likely one will be installed to
summon ARP workers in case of
fire. explosion, or other disaster.
Details of the civilian defense
are being set up by n. c. Mac
Phee, vice chairman, as part of a
dominion-wide program. II. j.
Lassaline of the Chamber of Com
merce is secretary.
GUARD INDUSTRIES
sour chief concern Is smooth
operation OF our defense indus
tries" Lassaline said. THE most
important function OF orr ARP
right now would be tn safeguard
these industries.
workers will be watching
constantly for any fifth column
sabotage" LaSsaline continued.
They will comprise a volun-
teer civilian organization of
10000 thoroughly investigated
and approved men and women,
who will be ready AT all times to
meet any emergencies oc-
casioned by war"
Services are divided into the
following groups: utilities. police
fire, medical and transportation
and communications. Leaders ir
these fields serve as controllers.
DIVIDED INTO POSTS
Windsor is divided into posts Of
approximately 500 population
each headed by warden.
"Supposing there Was q leak
In some utility line vital to our
war industries program" Lassa-
line explained. "a specialist in
that field who was nearest TO
the trouble might be asked TO
make temporary repairs.
Later utility heads would
fake oyer fhe yxorls |"
Canadian women OF Is years OF
more and men in the same group
who are unfit for military service
comprise the ARP. Tney will wear
arm bands. badges and carry
Identification cards.
Detroit evening times. (Detroit, Mich) 1921-1958, 1941-03-03

homendeed II affected fashion In the most
to be frank, with considerably travagant form.
more than the comforts vogue among the
and with none o for wide hats.
ences The exclusive set did not h'
Detroit evening times. (Detroit, Mich) 1921-1958, 1941-03-03

this bill approaches the reckless
ness. the daring. the insanity of
one who tries to ride Niagara Falls
in a rowboat."
Evening star., 1941-05-23

Adv.-GorewitZ VS. Preston ct al,
attorneys. Henry Gilligan; ]. A.
Crooks-G. c. Gertman; c. H. Hous-
ton.
24O9-Davis vs. Davis; attorneys,
J. j. Malloy-J. E. Bindeman.
2422-Feber VS.. Feber; attorneys,
Lambert & Hart-N. Lee Ball.
2430-Lynch VS.. Lynch; attorneys,
J. F. Donohue-J. Flaherty.
2431-Krieger VS.. Krieger; attor-
neys. Norman & Sandler-R H. Nc
Neill.
2433-Fountain VS.. Fountain; at
torneys, Bernath & Berger-F. D.
Dawson.
2439-Clodfelter VS.. Clodfelter; at
torneys, Rowland Edwards-Ben
Lindas.
2441-Haynes VS.. Haynes; attor-
neys, Dolores Murray-M. G. Ehr-
Itch.
2452-Dulay VS.. Dulay; attorneys,
James Shenos-E. M. Fonbuena.
2578-Thornton VS.. Thornton; at
torneys, S. H. Robeson-W. M. Shea.
2582-Howard VS.. Howard; attor-
neys, ]. A. Ryan-P. F. Biggins; M
Borchardt.
2648-Amanti VS.. Amanti; attor-
neys, ]. G. Dondero; j. p Labofish-
j. G. Weeda
649-Thompson VS.. Thompson:
ATTORNEYS. Houston Sy HOustOn-L
w. Caine.
2652-King VS.. King; attorneys,
L. A. Block-W. B. Mccarthy.
2654-Gorman VS.. German; attor-
neys, N. M. Dubar-Newmye &
Shapiro; David Hornstein.
22O8-Kennedy VS.. Kennedy; at
torneys, S. M. Boyd-Newmyer &
Shapiro.
1974-Guyan VS.. Guyan: attor-
neys, Milton Kaplan-F. B. Potter.
1930-Layton VS.. Layton; attor-
neys, C. S. Rhyne-H. K. Bryan.
2447-Caprio VS.. Caprio; attorneys,
Denny Hughes-A. l.. Bennett.
22l8-Doney VS.. Doney; attorneys,
M. A. Ostrow-George Wilmeth.
Adv.-Cullinane VS.. Cullinane; at
torneys, H. L. Knight. v. Grif-
fifth.
572-Jones VS.. Jones; attorneys,
Ray Neudecker-N. M. Baker.
495-Wyatt VS.. Wyatt: attorneys,
r. Gittelman-M. Conn; w. D. Hol-
lowell.
Adv.-Boileau VS.. Thacker: attor-
neys, Turco & Chessin-B. L. Tep-
per.
Mo.-Doleman VS.. Doleman; at
torneys, T. E. Lodge; M. E. Poole
D. Palkin.
Mo.-Hogan VS.. Monohan; attor-
neys, v. A. Sheehy: S. ]. McCath-
ran-Swingle g. Swingle.
2048-Walden, ct al VS. Guthrie;
attorneys, j. J. Hayden-R. A. Gu
sick.
1500-Ferguson VS.. Ferguson; at
torneys, Leon Sclawy-Sam Brown.
2375-Wilson vs. Newhard; attor-
neys, N. Friedenberg-Simo Koe-
nigsberger & Young.
2400-Wells VS.. billiard; attorneys,
John Gardiner-W. F. Martin.
2647-Munsey Trust Co. VS.. Wood;
attorneys, r. H. Yeatman-Kurt
Riemer.
2113-Mays VS.. Saunders; attor-
neys, N. A. Dobbins-J. F. Wilson.
l490-Maynard VS.. Scott; attor-
neys, r. Hudson-G. e. c. Hayes.
Evening star., 1941-05-23
Religious Committee
Pledges Aid 10 Army
Camps in D. {. Area
Will Help Programs
For Spiritual and Moral
WeIl-Beine of Men

The Committee on Religious Life
in the Nations Capital has pledged
cooperation to officials of the Army,
Navy and United States organiza-
tions. The committee is ready to-
assist whenever possible in the car
rying out of programs for the spirit
ual and moral well-being of men
in the Nations armed service sta
toned in this area, it has announced.
1t was voted at meeting Wednes-
day to sponsor an institute in the
near future to consider means of,
strengthening religious cooperation
in Washington. The members agreed
the present emergency conditions
provide many new opportunities for
service by religious forces which
should be given serious attention.
Former Senator William H. King.
of Utah, will be invited to serve as
special liaison representative for
the churches of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints in the Washington
Metropolitan area.
The committee expressed recog-
milton of the difficulties of Negroes
in seeking enjoyment for which they
are suited and decided to examine
possibilities of aid.
Other business coming before the
meeting included reports by the
Rev. Dr. William r. Barnhart on
behalf of the special committee on
religious education and the Rev.
Fred S. BuSchmeyer, chairman of
the Finance Committee.
The Rev. Dr. Albert J. Mccartney
presided and introduced three new
members, the Rev. William r. Barn
hart, executive secretary Of the
Washington Federation Of Churches
the Rev c. B. Foelsch. pastor of
Luther Place Memorial Church. and
the Rev. Henry w Snyder president
of the Lutheran Ministerial ASsocia-
ton.
Evening star., 1941-05-23
Frenchmen in Africa
Called to Revolt

NEW YORK, May % LP.-Gen.
Eduard Rene Marie de Larminat,
high commissioner of free French"
Africa, broadcast over Radio Braz-
zaville in French Equatorial Africa
last night call for all Frenchmen
in Africa to revolt against the "trai-
tors" of Vichy.
Gen. de Larminat declared in his
broadcast, recorded here by Column
bia Broadcasting System that the
day was not far off when German
planes would drop on French air.
dromes in Africa, and then French
men would be forced to fight or be
placed in concentration camps.
You will be asked to fight against
your former allies, and against
Americans who never will tolerate
the Germans in Africa" he said.
In commenting on French-man-
dated Syria, the general asserted:
There was a good French Army
with good material which was placed
there to defend Syria. 1t has been
broken up, demoralized, and be-
trayed by the chiefs of France. To-
day, all the material has been
abandoned to the Boches and the
Italians. And the Boche is now
about to help himself to the terri
tory of Syria"
At another point he commented: :
mo doubt Gen. Maxime) Weygand
has not hidden his willingness to
deliver you to the Germans. Gen.
Weygand is commander of French
armed forces in North Africa.
"Frenchmen," Gen. de Larminat
cried, you still can save the empire
from disaster. Act now"
Evening star., 1941-05-23
|. T.. T.. B|ames Two
Trainmen in Wreck
On Blair Road NV.
Failure Of Engineer
Of Striking Train to Cut
Speed Cited in Report

The Interstate Commerce Com
mission today made public its find
ings in the fatal train wreck Feb
ruary 26 on the Baltimore & Ohio
Railroad near Blair road and Sher-
idan street NV, declaring the acci-
dent was caused by failure to
properly reduce the speed of the
striking train and absence of ade-
quate flag protection for the stand
ing train.
Samuel Snyder, So, of Baltimore,
Md, engineer of the striking train,
was crushed to death beneath his
engine when it tumbled down an
embankment into Blair road NV.
Finding that the flagman of the
halted freight had not posted him
self sufficiently to the rear OF the
caboose, the 1. c. C. commented:
According to the rules, since he
was not recalled when his train de-
parted from Takoma Park, he was
required to remain in that vicinity
until he was recalled or relieved by
another f1agman. If he had re-
manned in that vicinity his tagging
signals would undoubtedly have
been given at a distance sufficient
for the engineman of the following
train to take action in time to stop
short of the train ahead"
Pointing out the evidence indi-
Gated warning torpedoes placed on
the track exploded and showdown
and stop-and-proceed signals were
displayed, the commission stated:
Why the engineman failed to
comply with the indications of the
two signals involved and the rule
pertaining to the explosion of tor
pedoes is not known, as he was
killed in the accident"
Evening star., 1941-05-23
Weather Report

,
District of Coumba-Loca probably thundeQuals
this ending followed cooler lowest
tonight moderate shifting winds becoming
fresh northwest
Maryland-Showe probably thundersquas this afternoon
ending followed cooler
Five-day period 73o Friday %,
194l, to 730 pm Wednesday, May %, 194l, inclusive
normal southern sections and slightly
below followed
during Scattered moderate southern
ending night Showers during
period.
Ohio valley tKentucky
period
tof fnerjOd
Evening star., 1941-05-23

Inc; attorneys, w. E. Leahy; N.
Chiascione-H. I. Quinn; R. w.
Galiher
l708-Flythe VS.. Flythe; attor-
neys, D. K. Offutt-J M. Boardman.
l448-Robertson VS.. Robertson; at
torneys, R. w. Galiher-Joseph
Bowman.
Adv-Pride VS.. Pride; attorneys,
N. M. Lubar-O'Sh & Goldstein.
1875 Sokolin VS.. Estes; attorneys,
I. H. Ealpern-O'Shea e. Goldstein.
1519-Wright VS.. Wright; attor-
neys, j. H. Wilson-C. M. Roeder.
1961-Simmons VS.. Simmons; at
torneys, Ray Neudecker-J. N.
Halper.
2o67-Wallace VS.. Wallace; attor-
neys. Ray Neudecker-S. M. Alpher.
2l21-Garrett VS.. Garrett; attor-
neys, Ray Neudecker-E. E. Cum
Minis; Edward Berger.
Adv.-Smith VS.. Smith: attorneys,
R. A. Cusick-D. L. Riordan.
1931-Crump VS.. Crump; attor-
neys, j. T. Bonner-J. F. Hillyard.
2235-Keehn VS.. Keehn: attorneys,
Thomas Scalley-Paul Delaney.
Mo.-Keyser VS.. Keyser; attorneys,
Ray Neudecker-I. H. Halpern.
2280-Briscoe VS.. Briscoe: attor-
neys, B. T. Sanders-Andrew How
ard.
2290-Hinkle VS.. Hinkle; attorneys,
Ellis Klein-Joseph Bulman; N. C.
Turnage.
2292-Gregory VS.. Gregory; attor-
neys, Ray Neudecker-Paul jamie
son.
2293-Holford VS.. Holford; attor-
neys, w. w. Dosh-J. M. Boardman.
2294-Pike VS.. Pike; attorneys, Ray
Neudecker-T. D. Nichols.
2300-Machezie VS.. Machezie; at
torneys, Soterios Nicholson-Joseph
Bonuso.
2303-White VS.. White; attorneys,
Joseph j. Malloy-D. L. Grantham.
Guard in re:-Susie Allen; attor-
neys, c. H. Houston-B. v. Lawson.
1630-Fletcher VS.. Fletcher; attor-
neys, Joseph D. Di Leon. s.
Bowles.
2331-Maloney VS.. Maloney; at
torneys, Ray Neudecker-H. M.
Fowler.
2336-Yautz VS.. Yautz; attorneys,
Nicholas Halpine-James Arts.
2352-Barriere VS.. Barriere; attor-
neys, j. A. Sargent-D. L. Riordan.
1854 Anduze VS.. Anduze; attor-
neys, E. A. Aaronson-O. D. Branson.
2359-Gates VS.. Gates; attorneys,
H. H. Bettelman-Charles Irelan.
2366-Penn VS.. Penn; attorneys,
G. B. Gunion-M. T. Woodruff.
2381-Veit VS.. Veit; attorneys, S.
g. Ingham-Marie McCathran.
2382-Hawkins VS.. Hawkins; at
torneys, l.. w. Caine-H. A. Dyson.
2387-Monton VS.. Monton; attor-
neys, B. T. Sanders-R. I. Miller.
2391-Rupy VS.. Rupy: attorneys,
H. T. Whelan-A. L. Brault.
2396-Crane VS.. Crane; attorneys,
Smith g. Edwards-A. A. Lipscomb.
2401-Stringfellow VS.. Stringfel-
low; attorneys, c. D. Artis-B. v.
Lawson.
2402-Spector VS.. Spector; attor-
neys. Irwin Goldstein-H. T. Whelan
2406-Harrison VS.. Harrison: at
torneys, B. v. Lawson-Clyde Free
man.
Evening star., 1941-05-23
Induction Of Nephew
OF Mrs. Wilson Is
Cancelled by Board
Step Token to Permit
S. R. Boiling to Accept
Job OF Bermuda Base

Selective service induction OF
Sterling Ruff1n Boiling, rs, nephew
of Mrs. Woodrow Wilson, was can
celed here yesterday to permit him
to take an engineering job at the
United States air base construction
project In Bermuda, 1t was learned
today.
Mr.. Boiling, a registrart at Board
No. 8, had been engaged in engineer
ing activities for more than four
years, spending most of that time as
a construction superintendent with
the firm of r. W. Boiling Co., head
ed by his father.
His deferment was in line with
bulletin dispatched to local boards
on May by District Selective Serv-
ice officials at the request of the
national draft organization. Point
ing out that the boards should be on
the lookout for men qualified to
work on the Atlantic defense bases,
acquired from England in the de-
stroyer deal, the bulletin said:
1T would appear to be common
knowledge that the development OF
these bases is definitely necessary
to the national safety and interest,
and local boards should take this
into consideration when classifying
such registrants"
Persuaded to Take Action.
Col. Davis G.. Arnold, chairman
of Board No. 8, said that with this
Government request in mind, "Mr.
Boiling was persuaded by me to see
an administrative assistant at the
War Department in charge of con-
Struction Of the new bases. might
add that when I made this recon-
mendation to Mr.. Boiling I was not
aware who his relatives might be,
and the suggestion was made only
in line with his qualifications"
Col Arnold said he had. been in
formed Mr.. Boiling would be en-
ployed at a salary of 81 $40 per year,
out of which the engineer would
have to clothe, feed and house him
self.
This would indicate Mr.. Boiling
Evening star., 1941-05-23
Court Assiqnments

attorneys, M. M. Doyle; Jos. J. NAL
loy-G. S. Jameson.
553-Hartford Accident & In
demnity Co. VS.. Acker; attorneys,
C. H. Doherty-R. M. Hudson.
2199-Geracy VS.. Hoover; attor-
neys, Nathan Brown-Gardiner
Earnest & Gardiner.
2139-Harper VS.. District of CO.
lumbia; attorneys, r. c. Handwerk-
Corp Counsel; Oliver Gasch.
1446-Peyser VS.. Mclean; attor-
neys, Irwin Geiger; H. P. Ganss-
Neil Burkinshaw: Hogan & Hart
son; McKenney, Flannery & Craigh-
hill
1914-Clements VS.. Capital
Transit Co.; attorneys. T. L. Dod-
son-E. l.. Jones; Howard Boyd.
1554-Nash VS.. Virginia Stage
Lines; attorneys, H. C. Allder-H.
I. Quinn.
2025-Wash. Refrig Co VS.. Gran
ford; attorneys, Michail F. Keogh-
Milton Dunn.
2172-Goldstein vs. Washington
Terminal Corp; attorneys, Charles
Ford-Hamilton & Hamilton.
1919-Crampton VS.. Mass. Pro-
tective Assoc; attorneys Scott
Crampton-L. M. Denit.
692-Levine VS.. Washington
Terminal Corp; attorneys, Lester
Wood-Hamilton & Hamilton
Adv.-Brandley Beall g. Howard
VS.. Miller; attorneys, JOS. T. Sherier
Milton Strasberger; David Horn
stein.
1546. 1547-Gardiner VS.. B e. o.
R. R. Co.; attorneys VIM. Gala
gher-Hamilton & Hamilton
Adv.-Cartell VS.. Guardian Man.
agement; attorneys. j. w. Tiff
S. A. Syme.
2l3-Keiser VS.. Hughuely; attor-
neys, Stanley Worth; j. N. Ander-
son-H. L. Ryan. jr.
Non-Jury Actions.
1641-Mathieson Alkali Works VS..
Achille; attorneys, c. M. Fisher
Harry Prince.
H. C.-In re Merriam; attorneys,
Milton Conn-De Witt Hyde.
Eastwood VS.. Metropolitan Life
Insurance Co.; attorneys, H. L.
McC cCormick-Arthur Drury; r. w.
Galiher.
Adv.-Brickley VS.. Brickley; at
torneys, j. H. Burnett-Charles Ford.
Mounted States VS.. Washington
Loan & Trust Co.; attorneys, B. j.
Long-G. P. Hoover.
2413 Occidental Hotel VS..
Schundler: attorneys, E E. Cummins
Ira Kaehne; P. Neagle.
1740, 1852, 1959-Reed, ct al. VS..
Coe; attorneys, c. E. Riordan-W.
w. Cochran.
Mo.-Craig VS.. Hines; attorneys,
w. E. Miller. H. Mitchell.
Ward VS.. Ryan, jr, ct al; attor-
neys, Scott Kellogg. A. Roney.
Bky-In re Atlas Photo. Eng. Co.;
attorneys, r. w. Mccullough
Tobriner, Graham, Brez &Tobriner.
Mo.-Hitt VS.. Cardillo; attorneys,
Baker & Topper; Warren Magee-
United States attorney; w. E.
Boote; C. B. Garnett.
1814-Le Foro VS.. LIE Foro; attor-
neys, w. c. Sullivan-Joseph D. Di
Leo.
Adv.-Nolan VI. Greyhound Lines,
Evening star., 1941-05-23
Continued From Page Ok

Brooks Transport Co.; attorneys, A.
Williams; r. H. Yeatman; A. A.
Stern-H. I. Quinn.
1470-Gaegler VS.. Capital Transit
Co.; attorneys, c. E. Foster; A. R.
Murphy; M. c. Toomey-E. L.
Jones, Howard Boyd.
1920. 31O1, 3102 3O66-Howell, ETC.,
VS.. East Coast Freight Lines; at
torneys, Albert Brick-H. I. Quinn
1909-Oscar VS.. Transue ct al; at
torneys, j. M. Bonuso; Newmyer &
Bress-H. l. Quinn.
431-Hill VS.. Capital Transit Co.;
attorneys, D. K. Offutt-E L. Jones;
Howard Boyd.
1053-Downey VS.. Penna. Grey
hound Lines; attorneys, H. S,
Rhoade-H. 1. Quinn.
Inq.-Shreeves VS.. Bateman; at
torneys, L. j. Ganse-None.
Inq.-Stevens VS.. Holmes; attor-
neys, j. B. Quinn-None.
Inq.-Long, exr., VS.. Young; at
torneys, F. R. Long-None.
1658-Slaughter VS.. Bettelman: at
torneys, S. E. Leonardo-W. M. Bas-
tian.
11-Wadhams VS.. Mclean; attor-
news. Lambert & Hart-Neil Burkin-
shaw.
627-Roche VS.. Blankenship ct al;
attorneys, w. H. McGrath-Michael
r. Keogh.
1275-Lyche VS.. Romm; attorneys
J. J. Malloy-H. I. Quinn.
1407-Harris VS.. Capital Transit
Co.; attorneys, w. E. Leahy; E. B
Sullivan-E L. Jones: H. w. Kelly
1377-Williams VS. Brown; attor-
reys, William Wendell-Baker &
Topper; Warren Magee.
1S41-Huhbell VS.. S. Kann's Sons
Co.; attorneys, B M. Chernoff; Les
ter Wood-E. L. Jones.
1843-Gelman ct al VS. GritZ; at
torneys, H H. Bettelman-Welch,
Daily & WEIGH.
1879-Hiu VS. Capital Transit Co.;
attorneys, I. H. Halpern-H. W.
Kelly.
1629-Ettelman VS.. I. T o. A. ct
al; attorneys, J. F. Reilly; E. B.
Sullivan-Whitefor Hart & Car
mody.
1590-Barrett VS. Davis ct al; at
torneys, H. I. Quinn-E. L. Jones.
1611-Raymond ct al. VS.. Horton
Motor Lines; attorneys, Michael F.
Keogh-H. I. Quinn.
1728-Mills VS.. Whelan Drug Co.;
attorneys, A M. Schwartz; Samue.
Friedman-E. L. Jones; Jos. J. Cot
ter.
2026-Gallop VS.. Jennings; attor-
neys, w. B. Wolf; A. Fisher-C. w
Arth.
2231-Columbia Casualty Co. VS.
NcDermott; attorneys, T. S. jackson
William A. Gallagher.
342-Wagner VS.. National Delivery
Association; attorneys, j. D. Dono-
vans. M. Boyd; r. H. Yeatman;
Milton Kronheim, jr.; r. E. Lynch
1844-Dodson VS.. Afro-American
Co., ct al; attorneys, H. o. Pollard
Il. L. Johnson-Cobb, Howard d
Hayes.
Adm.-Estate of William M. Kern;