Evening star., 1941-04-09
Court Assignments
DISTRICT COURT.

DISTRICT COURT.
Notice to fiduciaries: Please take
notice that all reports under rule
Al must be filed during April, 194l
In any case where postponement
of the hearing of a motion is to be
requested, notice should be given
the motions clerk not later than
3 o'clock the afternoon before such
motion is set for hearing. 1t will
be the policy of the court not to
grant postponements if the afore-
said notice is not given except when
extraordinary conditions have pre-
vented the giving of the notice.
Roll call of motions will be at
GAS am, as heretofore has been
the practice.
Hereafter in ali domestic relations
cases where temporary custody OF q
child, or the fixing of temporary
maintenance for wife or child Is
sought, the procedure shall be by
motion. as required by the rules OF
court. and not by rules to show
causes.
Motions-Justice James W. Morris
Assignments for tomorrow:
In re: Agnes Rowland; writ.
Bailey VS.. Bailey; attorney, Long
In re: Guardianship; rule.
Keystone VS.. Keystone, attorneys
Harth-Turco.
prouyo yS Rroun. r1llp
Maletti VS. Maletti; attorneys, d
Leo-Neudecker.
Putnam VS.. Owens; rule.
Ryan VS.. Ryan; attorneys, Galihel
Shapiro.
Bowling VS.. Dowling; rule,
Bowes VS.. Bowes; attorneys, Riordar
Miller
Williams VS.. Williams; rule.
Willis VS.. Willis; attorneys, Brit
ton-Branson.
Bottazzi VS.. Bottazzl; rule.
Garrett VS.. Garrett ct al; attor'
neys, Neudecker-Berger
Venable VS.. Venable; rule.
Jackson VS.. jackson; attorney
Brault.
Hudson VS.. Hudson; rule.
Goshorn VS.. Goshorn; attorneys
Dopp-Lebowitz.
Ediss VS.. Ediss: rule.
Deane VS.. Deane; attorneys, Aus
tin-Tyson.
Luckham VS.. Luckham; rule.
Sapoznick VS.. Sapoznick; attor'
neys, Neudecker-Whelan.
Ward VS.. Ward; rule
Gordon VS.. Gordon; attorneys
Fowler-Bernhardt.
Yates VS.. Yates: rule.
Mower VS.. Mower: attorneys, Ehr
lich-O'Shea.
Pride VS.. Pride; rule.
Jenkins VS.. Jenkins: rule
In re: Robert l.. Storey; writ.
Criminal Court 1-Justice Colds
borough.
Sentences:
United States VS.. Lewis A Ericsson
United States VS.. Harvey L. Jack
son.
United States VS.. Charles G. Ling
ley.
United States VS.. lean P. Wash
ington.
United States VS.. George High
tower.
Criminal Court 3-Justice Let's.
Arrangements;
United States VS.. Bernard Clark
United States VS.. Alfred r
Schmidt.
United States VS.. Charles N
Chavis.
United States VS.. Hattie F. Small
Sentences (referred):
United States VS.. George W
Barrie.
United States VS.. Paul J. Braxton
United States VS.. James o. Chase
Donald E. Byroads and Ernest c
Harris.
United States VS.. John L. Cooper
United States vs.. Howard W
Green.
United States VS.. Markley C. Hen
bricks.
United States VS.. Charles A. Hisey
United States VS.. Loretta Jackson
United States VS.. Clarence c
johnson.
United States VS.. Mack Jordan.
United States VS.. Fred H. Kruger
United States VS.. Sterling Penn.
United States VS.. George II
Schaefer.
United States VS.. Benjamin F
Stith and Leroy Henderson.
Sentences mot REFEREED:
United States VS.. william E. Agate
United States VS.. Nelson l.. King
United States VS.. Jesse LIE GLADE
De Brew.
United States VS.. Briggs Andrews
United States VS.. Melvin e
Brazeu.
United States VS.. Wilson Owens.
United States VS.. Willie Morgan.
United States VS.. Oliver T. Minor
Change of plea;
United States VS.. Thomas B. Yate'
and Earl Benson.
Jury Actions.
604-Borden VS.. Condit, attorneys
E. S. Borden-H. I. Quinn.
1514-Wheeler VS.. Skinker Motol
Co.; attorneys, C. H. Quimby-Mil'
ton Dunn.
1543-Aderhold ct al. VS.. Andre
sen; attorneys, H. L. McCormick-C
H. Doherty.
1916. 1547-Gardiner VS.. B. & o
r. r. Co.; attorneys, william A
Gallagher-Hamilton & Hamilton.
180O-Mandelos VS.. Vlahos ct al.
attorneys, Gardiner, Earnest & Gar
diner; A. Catsonis-C. H. Doherty
Wilkes & Arts.
122HDouglas VS.. Malvan &
Schey; attorneys, B. v. Lawson-H
I. Quinn.
Admin re estate of Gertrud
williams: attorneys, L. 8. Hayes
Franklyn Yasmer.