davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
ORDER OF
PUBLICATION

William c. Thomas, Plaintiff,
VS..
Estelle Amelia Thomas,
Defendant.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
MONTGOMERY COUNTY.
No. 1888 Equity.
The object of this suit is to
procure divorce a via,cuLo matri-
nsonis by the plaintiff, William C..
Thomas, from the defendant,
Estele Amelia Thomas.
The bill in substance states that
the plaintiff, William C. Thomas,
was married to the defendant,
Estelle Amelia Thomas, in the
month of June, 1888 at Ashton,
Montgomery County, Maryland by
the Reverend johnson, a Minister
of the Gospel; that there have
been no children born as a result
of the aforesaid marriage; that
after the plaintiff and defendant
were married they lived together
as husband and wife until the
latter part of November, 1895, at
which time the defendant, without
any just cause or reason, aban-
doned and deserted the plaintiff
and declared her intention to live
with him no longer, and that such
abandonment has continued I'M
interruptedly since said date and
is deliberate and final and the
separation of the parties is
beyond any reasonable expecta-
ton of a reconciliation; that the
conduct of the plaintiff has al
ways ben kind, affectionate and
above reproach, and that he has
never given the defendant any
just cause or reason to desert him,
but on the contrary has behaved
himself as a faithful, chaste and
affectionate husband; that the
plaintiff is a resident of Montgom-
cry County and has been so for
more than two years preceding the
filing of this ,uit; and the de-
PENDANT is a nonresident of the
State of Maryland and is to the
best of the plaintiffs knowledge
now resides at White Plains, in
the State of New York.
The bill then prays that the
plaintiff may be divorced a vin-
'cuLo mot7inonii from the defend
ant, and for such other and fur
Their relief as the plaintiffs case
may require.
It is, thereupon, this 31st day
of March, 1871, by the Circuit
Court for Montgomery County, as
a Court of Equity, ordered that
the plaintiff by causing a copy Of
this order to be inserted in some
newspaper published in said Mont
gomery County once in each of
four successive weeks before the
3rd day of May, 1941, give notice
to the defendant, Estelle Amelia
Thomas, who is a nonresident of
the State of Maryland, Of the
object and substance of this Bill
of Complaint, warning her to ap-
pear in this Court, in person or
by solicitor, on or before the 21st
day of May, next, to show cause,
if any she has, why a decree
ought not 40 be passed as prayed.
CLAYTON X. WATKINS,
Clerk of the Circuit Court
for Montgomery County.
True Copy-Test:
CLAYTON X. WATKINS, Clerk.
$50
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
Order Nisi-

Order Nisi-
In the Matter of the Sales made
by Fred C. Nellinger, Bailiff of
the Town of Rockville, Mary
land, on Certain Property to
Pay Taxes Thereon.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
MONTGOMERY COUNTY.
No. 1405 Miscellaneous
Petitions 1910 : 1941
Upon examination of the report
of Fred C. Nellinger, Bailiff of
the Town of Rockville, in Mont
gomery County, State of Mary
land, in the aforementioned mat
ter, the Court being Of the opin-
ion that the provisions of law
have been complied with substan-
TALLY, it's is thereupon ordered by
the Circuit Court for Montgomery
County, Maryland, this LIST day of
April, 1941, that all persons,
whose property is reported to have
been sold for said taxes, do show
cause on or before the 26th day
Of April, 1901, why said sale or
sales should not be finally ratified
and confirmed; provided a copy
of the order shall be printed in
some newspaper published in
the Town of Rockville once in
each of three consecutive weeks
before the said 26th day of April,
1871.
STEDMAN PRESCOTT,
True Copy-Test: Judge.
CLAYTON K. WATKINS,
663 Clerk,
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
SIMPSON AND SIMPSON,
Solicitors for the Plaintiff.
Order OF
Publication

AWAAN@NVAUAA
Edith Frances PIERCE,
Plaintiff,
VS..
Kenneth Albert Peirce,
Defendant.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SIT
TING AS A COURT
OF EQUITY.
No. 1892 Equity.
The object of the Bill of Com
plant in this case is to have the
marriage of the plaintiff and de-
PENDANT annulled, vacated and set
aside.
The Bill of Complaint states
that the plaintiff is resident of
Takoma Park, Montgomery Coun-
ty, Maryland, and brings this suit
in her own right.
That the defendant, Kenneth
Albert Peirce is a resident of the
District of Columbia, and is sued
as hereinafter is more fully set
forth.
That the plaintiff and defendant
were married June 8, 1910, in
Takoma Park, Montgomery Coun-
ty, Maryland, by the Reverend
R. Paul Schearrer, a Minister of
the Gospel.
That at the time of the entry
into said marriage. the plaintiff
believed that she was entering into
binding and legal contract, and
was ready and willing to perform
all of the reciprocal duties and
obligations incident thereto, but
that the defendant, after the said
marriage ceremony had been per-
formed, failed in his marital
obligations to this plaintiff in that
there has never at any time been
any sexual intercourse between
the said plaintiff and defendant,
and said marriage has never been
consummated although the plain
tiff was ready and willing to per-
form her wifely obligations to
said husband and to live with
him as his wife, and although the
parties hereto lived together in
the same home for a period of
eight (8) months subsequent to
their said marriage, the defend
ant was unable because of ply
steal impotence to perform the
act of intercourse and consum-
mate said marriage contract, all
of which was unknown to the
plaintiff, but known to the de-
defendant, at the time of the entry
into said contract.
The Bill of Complaint prays
that the marriage of the plaintiff
and defendant may be annulled,
vacated and set aside and have
general relief.
1t is thereupon this 9th day of
April, A. D. 1941. by the Circuit
Court for Montgomery County,
sitting as Court of Equity,
Ordered that the Plaintiff by
causing a copy of this Order to
be inserted in some newspaper,
printed and published in said
Montgomery County, once in each
of four successive weeks before
the 10th day Of May, A. D. 1941,
giving notice to said absent and
nonresident defendant of the
object and substance of this Bill
of Complaint, warning him to be
and appear in this Court in per-
son or by solicitor on or before
the 18th day of May, A. D. 1941,
to show cause, if any he may
have, why decree ought not be
passed herein as prayed; or in the
alternative that a copy of this
Order be served upon the said
defendant on or before one month
before the 18th day of May, 1871.
CLAYTON X. WATKINS,
Clerk of the Circuit Court
for Montgomery County.
True Copy-Test:
CLAYTON X. WATKINS,
688 Clerk.
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
Notice To Creditors

4NOeANG AZ OAN0AVOAG
NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN,
that the Subscriber of Montgom-
cry County, has obtained from the
Orphans Court of Montgomery
County, in Maryland, Letters Tes-
tamentary on the Personal Estate
of
AGNES JOSEPHINE MATLACK,
late of Montgomery County, de-
ceased. All persons having Claims
against the deceased, are hereby
warned to exhibit the same, with
vouchers thereof, legally authenti-
Gated to the subscriber on or be-
fore the LIST day of October, next:
they may otherwise by law be
excluded from all benefit of said
Estate. All persons indebted to
said Estate are requested to make
immediate payment.
Given under my hand this LIST
day of April, in the year of our
Lord, one thousand nine hundred
and forty-one.
F. BARNARD WELSH,
Executor,
652 Rockville, Maryland.
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
DAVID E. Belts, Attorney,
Rockville, Maryland.
Notice To Creditors

4NUIACC ~ 1COACO1 -
NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN,
that the Subscriber of Montgom-
cry County, has obtained from the
Orphans Court of Montgomery
County, in Maryland, Letters of
Administration on the Personal
Estate of
ELWOOD E. BARR
late of Montgomery County, de-
ceased. All persons having Claims
against the deceased, are hereby
warned to exhibit the same, with
vouchers thereof, legally authenti-
Gated to the subscriber on or be-
fore the 1st day of October, next:
they may otherwise by law be
excluded from all benefit of said
Estate. All persons indebted to
said Estate are requested to make
immediate payment.
Given under my hand this LIST
day of April, in the year of our
Lord, one thousand nine hundred
and forty-one.
E. LILLIAN BARR,
Administrative,
653 Clarksburg, Maryland.
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
JOHN E. OxLEY. Attorney
Notice To Creditors

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,
that the Subscriber of Montgom-
cry County, has obtained from the
Orphans Court of Montgomery
County, in Maryland, Letters of
Administration on the Personal
Estate of
THOMAS T. HICKMAN
late of Montgomery County, de-
ceased. All persons having Claims
against the deceased, are hereby
warned to exhibit the same, with
vouchers thereof, legally authenti-
Gated to the subscriber on or be-
fore the 18th day of September
next: they may otherwise by law
be excluded from all benefit of
said Estate. All persons indebted
to said Estate are requested to
make immediate payment.
Given under my hand this 18th
day of March in the year of our
Lord, one thousand nine hundred
and forty-one.
DELLA T. HICKMAN,
Administrative,
Dickerson, Maryland,
651 Route No. 2.
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
Mortgage Sale


gage from Cragin w. Donaldson
and Margaret L. Donaldson, his
wife, dated August 81, 1888 and
recorded among the Land Records
of Montgomery County, Maryland
in Liber 708, folio 294. default
having occurred in the terms and
conditions of said mortgage, the
undersigned as Attorney therein
named for said purposes, will on
Saturday, the 3rd day of
May, 1941
AT THE HOUR OF 1880
O'CLOCK, A. NJ, in front of the
Court House Door at Rockville,
Montgomery County, Maryland,
offer for sale at public auction,
all of the land and premises de-
scribed in said mortgage, to-wit:
Parts of tracts called "Con-
clusion," Conclusion Diminished"
and "Lost Breeches." Being all
the land and premises which were
conveyed to the said Robert E.
Eader ct ux by Charles F. Stream
ct ux by deed dated August /,
1917, recorded in Liber 264, folio
400. saving and excepting here
from 24.27 acres, more or less,
heretofore decided by the said Rob-
ert E. Eader ct ux to Thomas E.
Thompson and Elsie N. Thomp-
son, on June 81, 1919, recorded
in Liber 282, folio 1886, said deed
describes the property as con-
tanning 208.0 acres, more or less,
as surveyed by Charles ]. Mad
dox for 1882 acres, more or less,
exclusive of said 24.27 acres
above mentioned. This property
is improved by a 2-story metal
roof, frame dwelling and a metal
roof frame barn. This property
is located about one-half mile
Northwest of the Clarksburg :
Boyds Road and about two miles
North of Boyds and is now occu-
pied by Mervin D. Mills and
Romero d. Chamberlain.
TERMS OF SALE: Ae pre-
scribed by said mortgage: All
cash upon ratification of sale by
the Court, a deposit of $4,000
viii be required when the prop
erty is knocked down. All costs
of conveyancing, including Certif-
cate of Title. Deed, State and
Federal Revenue Stamps, etc., to
be paid by the purchaser.
HAROLD G.. SMITH,
673 Attorney.
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
THOMAS M. ANDERSON, Attorney
Rockville, Maryland.
Trustees Sale
OF VALUABLE
IMPROVED REAL ESTATE
In CHEVY CHASE,
Montgomery County, Maryland

Under and by virtue of the
power and authority conferred
upon them by a certain Deed of
Trust from Edna Price Rosen-
kranz, widow. to Henry P. Blair
and Allen C. Clark, Trustees,
dated the 3rd day of September,
1887 and recorded among the Land
Records of Montgomery County,
in Liber No. 678 at Folio 249,
default having occurred under the
terms thereof, the undersigned,
Trustees. will offer for sale on
the premises. as hereinafter de-
scribed, at public auction, on
Monday, the 5th day of
May, 1941,
AT THE HOUR OF 400
O'CLOCK P. M, the land and
premises, situate, lying and being
in the County of Montgomery and
State of Maryland, described in
said Deed of Trust as follows, to
wit: Lot 1, in Block 19, in George
E. Jennings subdivision of parts
of "Oatland", etc., known as
"Chevy Chase Section AZ, Mont
gomery County, Maryland; as per
plat recorded in Plat Book No.
2, Plat 100, one of the Land Rec
ords for said Montgomery Coun-
ty; subject to building restrictions
and covenants of record.
The property consists of a lot
with a frontage of 1O8.98 feet
and a depth of 1O8 feet, improved
by a handsome two-story brick
and stucco dwelling containing 10
rooms and 3 baths, with all mod
ern conveniences. There is also
a two-car garage. The premises
are known as 4O1 Rosemary
Street, Chevy Chase, Maryland,
and is highly desirable residen-
tial property.
TERMS OF SALE: All cash
upon ratification of the sale by
the Court. A deposit Of $500.0O
will be required at the time of
sale. Conveyancing, recording
fees, notary fees, examination of
title, revenue stamps, etc., to be
at the cost of the purchaser.
HENRY p. BLAIR,
ALLEN C.. CLARK,
Trustees,
816 18th Street, N. w.,
$50 Washington, D. G.
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
Saturday. May 10, 1941
AT 2 O'CLOCK P. M.

offer for sale on the mortgaged
premises all of the lands and pre-
misses described in said mortgage,
same being a parcel of Land sixty
by one hundred, twenty-five feet
(60x125') adjacent to Section /,
Indian Spring Park, as shown
upon recorded plat of said subdi-
vision.
improvements known as No. PIP
Dearborn Ave. in Indian Spring
Village consists of a frame DWELL
ing house consisting of six rooms
with furnace heat, electricity, gas,
water, sewerage and other modern
|conveniences available. This is a
type of moderate cost dwelling
well-located and an attractive offer
ing for the price at which it can be
sold.
A deposit of Two Hundred, Fifty
Dollars will be required when the
property is knocked down, balance
upon ratification of sale by the
Court about thirty days thereafter.
Arrangements may be made by a
satisfactory purchaser for a por-
ton of the purchase price to remain
upon the property by way Of first
mortgage. Conveyancing and all
revenue stamps at the cost of the
purchaser.
WILLIAM F. PRETTYMAN,
Attorney named in mortgage
to make sale. 722
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24

In the Matter of the Mortgage
from Emma M. Perrell and
Hezekiah E. Perrell, her hus-
band,
James E. Offutt.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, AS
A COURT OF EQUITY.
No. $3.50 Equity.
ORDERED, this 18th day of
April A. D. 1941, by the Circuit
Court for Montgomery County, as
a Court of Equity, that the sale
made by Harold C.. Smith, Attor-
ney for the Purpose of Foreclos-
ure to Herbert C. King and
Eleanor B. King, his wife, and
reported in the above entitled
cause, be ratified and confirmed,
unless cause to the contrary
thereof be shown on or before
the 10th day of May next: Pro-
vided a copy of this order be in
serted in some newspaper pub
lished in said Montgomery Coun-
ty, once in each of three success
sive weeks before the said 10th
day of May, 1941.
The Report states the amount
of the sale to be $1240.OO.
CLAYTON X. WATKINS,
Clerk of the Circuit Court
for Montgomery County.
True Copy-Test:
CLAYTON X. WATKINS, Clerk,
FOG
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24
MORTGAGE SALE

By Virtue of the power and au-
thority contained in a certain
mortgage from Cleveland r. Mil
stead and wife to Newton Stabler
(now deceased) and Mary H. Sta
bier, his wife, bearing date the
twentieth day of August in the
year nineteen hundred and twenty
eight and recorded among the
Land Records of Montgomery
County, Maryland, in Liber 461,
folio 1858, the undersigned attorney
named therein will on
Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1941-04-24

Order Nisi-
In the Matter of the Mortgage
from Emma M. Perrell and
Hezekiah E. Perrell, her hus-
band,
Evening star., 1941-11-07

414-Vollmer VS.. Vollmer; attor-
neys, w. w. Stickney-J. M. Board
man.
15ll2-Grant VS.. Grant; attorneys,
r. M. Charles-R. l.. TedroW.
Adv-Quality e. Service Laundry
VS.. Fairall; attorneys, Green * Pow
ers; A. l.. Bennett-S. H. Robson;
R. A. Cusick.
Mo. Aefleck VS.. Bowie; attorneys,
J. M. Dickey-H. w. Wheatley.
19l-BranZell VS.. Branzell; attor-
neys. J. H. McCoole-F. l.. Shigo.
193-Arnold VS.. Arnold; attorneys,
A. K. Johnson-R. D. Gillespie.
213-Kojouharof VS.. Kojouharof; ;
attorneys. Charles Pergler; Frank
Evening star., 1941-11-07

]. G. Gately-Martin Mendelsohn.
425-Dennison VS.. Dennison; at
torneys, M I. Lewis-M. c. Mold.
428-Taylor VS.. Taylor; attorneys,
Eli Grubic-O. D. Branson
43l-BroWn VS.. Brown: attorneys
T C. Scalley-J. j. Sirica-B. F.
Biggins.
433-McKim VS.. McKim; attor-
neys. A. R. Murphy-E H. Davis.
297-Angelo VS.. Toutorsky; at
torneys, A F. Graham; j K. Hughes
H. c. Allder-C. V. INLAY; j. r
Reed; l.. j. Ganse.
441-Wilson VS.. Wilson; attorneys
r. d. Dunn-M. l. Lewis; E
DeSgres.
Evening star., 1941-11-07

Adv.-Haberman VS.. Haberman;
attorneys. Henry Snyder-Martin
MendelSohn.
312. -Carborundum Co VS..
Coe; attorneys. Albert Grobstein-
w. w. Cochran.
216-Brown VS. Brown: attorneys,
M E Buckley-Ray Neudecker.
266-Grape VS.. Grape; attorneys,
j. H. Batt--Newmyer e. Shapiro.
MOO. D. Wilson Co. VS.. National
Training School: attorneys, L. j.
Ganse-John Mitchell; Lester Wood.
310l l2-Bawell VS. Bawell; attor-
neys, Marcus Borchardt-Al Brick.
143-Schuck VS.. Schuck; attorneys.
T. f. OConnell-Hugh Lynch, jr.
Evening star., 1941-11-07

Shigo-Austin Garfield; R. w. Cali
her.
270-Cecchini VS.. Cecchini: attor-
neys, j. II. Chessin-A. r. Murphy
321-Griffith Consumer VS.. Moo
nan, ct al; attorneys, C. B. Stein:
Selig Bret. x. Dunn; M. F.
ODonoghue.
368-Barrle VS.. Barrie; attorneys,
Il. E. Gable-C. M. Bernhardt.
4l5-ONeil VS.. ONeil; attorneys,
j. j. O'Brien-C. w. Proctor.
420-Riddle VS.. Riddle; attorneys,
c. j. King-Evelyn butcher.
422-Lynch VS.. Lynch; attorneys,
j. d. DiLeo-J. K Hughes.
423-WOltz VS.. Volt; attorneys,
Evening star., 1941-11-07
NOn-Jury Actions.

| NOH-JuTS ACt1UnS.
6l-Brewer vs. Brewer; attorneys,
B. J. ager-Hugh Lynch. jr
Mo.-Campbell VS.. Smith: attor-
neys. Edmund Campbell; c. B. Stein
R M Hudson
34l-White VS.. White; attorneys,
w. j. Zepp-W. M. Shea.
42-Morgan vs. Morgan: attor-
news, w. M. Adams-W. T. Hannah.
2l2-Bassford VS.. BaSSford; at
torneys. H. L. McCormick-C. w
Proctor.
295-Cryer VS.. Serkis, ct al: attor-
neys. Toomey e. Toomey; Harry
Friedman: L. A. Block; N. J. Hal
pine: G. F. Hospidor F. w. Taylor;
United States Attorney.
34-Snider VS.. Kelly. ct al: attor-
neys, C. H Doherty-J. L. Laskey;
L. M. DENT
Mo-Bolton VS. General Motors;
attorneys, Coe g. Richards-S. G.
Ingham.
Mo.-Hoover VS. Hoover; attor-
nevs. c. H. Doherty-W. C. Sullivan.
Mo.-Hoover VS.. District Title Co;
attorneys. Hubert King-T. S. Jack
son: L M. DENT: w. c. Sullivan.
367-Bouis. excr. VS.. Watkins: at
torneys, E. F. Henry-G. E. Quinn,
Jr.
Mo.-Faulks ct al. VS.. American
Security & Trust Co.: attorneys,
r. L. Merrick-D. D. Drain.
Adv.-Gordon VS. Goldblatt: at
torneys, M. De Belle-Morris Ben
son.
314-Montgomery Ward g. Co, VS..
Coe; attorneys, E. D. Crummond-
w. w. Cochran.
89-Washington VS. Washington:
attorneys. William Wendell-George
Boden; D. r. Esher.
506-Rembert ct al VS.. Coe; at
torneys. L. B. Kemon-W. w.
Cochran.
Mo.-White VS.. Fairfax: attorneys,
F.. w. Hill, jr.-S. P. Champion
5l-Sartori VS.. Sartori: attorneys.
Hugh Obear-R. A. Cusick.
Adv.-Rose VS.. Rose: attorneys,
R. H. McNeill-J. F. OBrien.
Mo.-Methodist Cemetery Asso.
VS.. King; attorneys, L. J. Ganse-
L. G. Wood; Lester Wood.
26-Wood VS. Wood: attorneys. J.
j. Slattery-G. C. Gertman.
31-Smith VS. Smith: attorneys, r.
A. Cusick-D L. Riordan.
178-Bolack VS.. Swofford: attor-
neys, w. E. Miller-United States
attorney; w. E Boote.
7-Bradford VS.. Bradford: attor-
neyS, D. K. Offutt-W. E. Miller.
359-Plummer. ct al VS.. Rozansky;
attorneys. j. L. Chapman, jr-Frank
Paley.
435-American Security & Trust
Co. VS.. Barry, ct al; attorneys, Nc
Kenney, Flannery q Craighill-J. D
Dougherty; Joseph Cantrell; Frank
Stetson: j. D. Fitzgerald.
437-Cafritz VS.. National Savings
& Trust Co.; attorneys, Milton
Strasburger-Minor, Galley & Drury;
L. M. Denit.
440-Hockaday vs. Hockaday; at
torneys, S. M. Boyd H. C. De Lozier
4l1-Beavers VS.. Beavers; attor-
neys, j. D. Sadler-J. D. Malloy.
4l3-Privolos VS.. Privolos: attor-
neys. Raymond Neudecker-J. J.
OBrien.
Evening star., 1941-11-07
Court Assignments
Continued From Page 2-X)
United States VS.. Charles Fletcher.
United States VS.. James Lancaster.
Jury Actions.

44-DOWney VS.. pennsylvania
Greyhound Lines; attorneys. Max
Rhoade; Helen Sherry: Lester Wood
H l. Quinn.
225-Giant Food Shopping Center
VS.. Liberty Mutual Life Insurance
Co.: attorneys, Milton Strasburger
Irwin Geiger-E. l.. Jones, Howard
Boyd.
79-Silverstein VS.. Welfare g. Rec
reational Association; attorneys
Abraham Chaifetz: D. K. Offutt-
E. L. Jones, Howard Boyd.
29l-Verrill vs. Karavades; attor-
neys, M. F. Keogh-V. V. Vaughan.
215-Varner VS.. Henkel attorneys,
r. T. Lynch-C. w. Arth.
162-Roberts VS.. Capital Transit
Co.; attorneys, ]. J. Malloy-E. l..
Jones.
53-Lyche VS.. Romm: attorneys,
j. j. Malloy-H. l. Quinn.
1l4-Gates ct al VS.. Meyer ct al:
attorneys, H. L. McCormick-V. o.
Hill: Spencer Gordon; United
States attorney.
ll5-Gates ct al. VS.. Washington
Daily News ct al; attorneys, H. L.
McCormick-Charles Walker; V. o.
Hill; United States attorney; NJ P.
Friedlander
243-Berkow ct al. VS.. Gill ct al. :;
attorneys, Milton Conn; A. L. New
myer; D. G Bress-C. S. Baker
Benjamin Topper; Warren Magee
l.. c. RainWater.
73-Barrett VS.. Davis ct al. at
torneys, H l. Quinn-E. L. Jones.
1 74-Raymond ct al. VS.. Horton
! Motor Lines: attorneys, M. F.
Keogh-H l. Quinn
l07-Ottman VS.. Sanitary Grocery
Co.; attorneys. Frost, Myers & Tow
ers-H. l. Quinn
! l29-Thomas VS.. Merrick: attor-
neys, H. I. Quinn: r. w. Galiher-
r. L, Merrick; T. s. Jackson.
267-Hartford Accident e. Indem-
nifty Co. VS.. Curtis; attorneys, c. H
Doherty-C. S. Lawrence.
! 246-Hinson VS.. Ewell ct al: at
torneys, H. H. Bettelman-S. B
Brow.
250-Eierhart VS.. L. P. Stewart
Co: attorneys. H. C. Wender: j. c.
Levy-N. c. Turnage; r. B. Ben
nett
I Admin re: Estate of S. S. Kir-
by; attorneys. M P. Mccall: LEROY
Bendheim-R. H. Hunter, w. c.
Taylor.
Admin re Estate of Emma
Bowles; attorneys. w. f Richard :
son: w NJ Bastian: c. F. Ford
/ S. R. Blanken; G. w. Smith; D. K
Staley.
1ol-Hanagan VS. Stephens: at
torneys, w. A. Gallagher-H. C
Alder.
1861. 1871. l8s8,2, 19l9is-
Fades, Adm VS.. Capital Materials
Co ct al: attorneys, L. J. Ganse-
Swingle & Swingle
60-Harris VS.. Capital Transit Co. D.:
attorneys, w. E. Leahy: E. B. Sui
livan; A. L. NeWmyer-E L. Jones
H. w. Kelly.
2l-Tully VS.. Washington Proper
ties. Inc; attorneys. w. E Leahv: E
B. Sullivan-Paul Lesh; c. w. Arth
155-Reed VS.. Penn. Mutual Life
Insurance Co; attorneys, Smith &
| Edwards-H. I. Quinn.
150-DeLay VS.. District Of Column
bia; attorneys, J. C. Turco-Corp
Counsel.
3l8-Johnston vs. McMurray: at
torneys. M. F. Keogh-Frost. Myers
e. Towers.
350-Held VS.. Radio Cab Co. ct
al: attorneys, D. K. Offutt-Roberts
& McInnis.
83-Mattingly VS. Sterrett Operat-
ing Service; attorneys, E. H. Davis
H. 1. Quinn.
l26-Smithers VS. Capital Transit
Co: attorneys, A. F. Adams-H.
| Wise Kelly.
156-Rollins VS.. Gardner Stuart
Motors Co.; attorneys. A. L.
Wilcher; Raymond Gittelman-E.
l.. Jones
87-Lust VS.. Zimmerman ct al :;
attorneys, Simon, Koenigsberger e.
Young-E. L. Jones; Howard Boyd.