The Waterbury Democrat., 1940-10-17

NAAAAA0 HI 4OOt, dAAO O1ACAO
 This plan was revived again dur ing the Panay incident in 1888, but each time there were differences of opinion inside the Administra- tion and the plan fell flat.
 Today, almost exactly the same problem faces the administration, and again there are basic differ ences of opinion differences which are honest and natural when the future peace of the country is at stake.
 The group inside the Cabinet which favors 8 complete stoppage of Japan's raw materials of war, especially her oil, includes Secre- tary of War Stimson, Secretary of the Navy Knox, Secretary of In- terior Ickes and Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau also cer- tain admirals in the navy. Per- haps it is significant that the strongest advocates of complete embargoes against Japan are the three Republican members of the cabinet Stimson, Knox and Ickes.
 On the other hand, the State Department plus some of the admirals favor go-slow policy toward Japan. They believe in applying the embargoes gradually, or as MT. Ickes described it, "cut- ting off the dogs tail by inches" JAPAN MIGHT ATTACK
 Specifically, they do not believe in cutting off Japan's oil supply which is the all-important ques- tion under diplomatic discussion between the British and Ameri- can governments.
 The State Department concurs that cutting off Japan's oil would pralyze her fleet after her pres ent two and half months supply was exhausted. But they also believe it would force Japan to move into the Dutch East Indies immediately in order to get more oil.
 However, the embargo now
 group within the Cabinet con-
 tends that the Dutch East In-
 dies are fortified sufficiently to
 withstand four months seize
 and that with the U. s. fleet on
 guard in that general area,
 Japan could not risk an attack
 on these islands.
 What makes the intra-cabinet debate doubly vital is knowledge O ficIx keeps the Italian and Nazi fleets bottled up in Europe, the U. s. fleet can operate as a one-ocean navy, thereby keeping most of its vessels on guard against Japan in the Pacific. But once Bri- tain's naval defense weakenS, then the United States will have the navies of the European dictators to contend with in the Atlantic, plus the Japanese in the Pacific.
 And two-ocean drive on South America by both the dictators and Japan is more than the navy likes to contempate. That is the chief argument behind the "totaI- embargo now" group.
 LIMITED EMBARGO ON OIL
 The Cabinet difference first came to be heard more than a month ago when the action-now group placed on the Presidents desk an executive order embar- going the sale of oil. They ar- gued that with the military clique in Japan actually threatening war. they could not continue to give the Japanese navy this vital fuel. The President concurred and signed the order. Then it went over to the State Department to be carried out. And the State Department revised the order so that it applied only to high-test gasoline.
 The embargO-nOw group also advocated an immediate stOp- page of aiI scrap iron shipments to Japanu. But the State De- pertinent again inteEvened 90 that scrap iron shipments con- tlnued on everything except aNO. serap," and even No. 1 scrap could be shipped on license. It was only the other day that the sale ee all scrap Iron, after much urging by the National Defense Commission, was finally ems baFgeed.
 The question of cutting off oil to Japan atill is a moot question Inside tho Cabinet. and ia being discussed with the British eoverns ment.
 NAVY vs. STATE DEPT.
 Last week one argument over ihls point and over general naval