The Waterbury Democrat., 1939-04-28

 Brown, would reconstruct" the bank accounts of the accused with l them.
 Atty. Cassidy May Examine
 Attorney Cassidy was the only de- fense counsel who indicated he might cross examine the witness, but following a recess, he announced that he did not desire to question the witness.
 Following the recess, during which time it was learned that the sub- poena duces tecum had been served on Brown by Deputy Sheriff Can- nota, Alcorn announced that he would be unable to proceed until the exchange proof" bank records had been admitted.
 Instead, he had the records marked for identification, stating that over the week end, Brown and his assist ants would segregate them, making it possible that they be offered as a full exhibit next Tuesday, when the Fist week of the trial will open.
 Judge Orders Exhibit
 Judge Inglis ordered that the 277 sheets, the first offer, covering the period May IS, 1892, to April 26, 1933, be marked exhibit 363 for identifica- tion. Following which, Alcorn in- troduced 105 sheets for April 27, 1883, to December 31, 1883; 301 for the year 1884; BOP for the year 1885; 3O1 for 1886 and 300 for 1897. The total number of sheets was 1,586.
 Alcorn also announced, for the purpose of the record, that he is prepared to introduce records from the Citizens and Manufacturers National Bank, including ledger cards covering the period December "A, 1881, to February ', 1888.
 Admission of Alcorn Defense counsel, continuing their objections, forced an admission from Alcorn that all the PIT sheets in the proposed exhibit would not be relevant. But, he said, Brown would only refer to the relevant sheets during his examination.
 Attorney George w. Crawford brought in the difficulties which would result to the defense in the cross-examination of Brown, unless the irrelevant sheets were segre- gated.
 Judge Inglis also suggested that the sheets be divided. If we can reduce it to smaller mass" he said, i've will save time" He said that counsel are entitled to as much time to examine all exhibits as may be necessary.
 Atty. Crawford Objects
 Alcorn suggested that the sheets only be marked for identification, but Attorney Crawford said that would make them mo better off" unless they were segregated. For he said, the first question to Brown on cross-examination would be that he divide the relevant sheets from the irrelevant.
 Attorney Alcorn stated that John sons state testimony would be com- pleted following the identification of the bank records. Judge Inglis urged that, in the interest of time saving, the defense cross-eXamine the witness, if they so desired, then allow Alcorn to conduct the direct examination necessary on Tuesday after the segregation of sheets.
 Rejuire Couple of Days
 Announcement followed at that point by the special prosecutor, that he had learned from his &C., countant that it would require 8 couple of days for the separation of the bank records. He commented that there was question in his mind as to whether any more could be accomplished by him until the bank records were prepared.
 Judge Inglis, in adjourning court, instructed the jury that next weeks sessions, starting Tuesday, will De held in accordance with daylight saving tune, although according to law, he would have to refer to all time as standard time. Adjourned Trial
 He adjourned court until Tuesday at g o'clock, standard time, which he advised the jury is equivalent to 10 o'clock daylight saving time. well continue on that baSiS-I won't say for how long," he said, smiling broadly.
 While counsel and jurors laughed, Attorney Crawford mterjected, For the year after next" indicating the length of the trial.
 Brown, who is expected to take the stand in the near future for the state, has been working in the in- vestigation since the very outset of the appointment of Hugh M. Alcorn as special prosecutor of Waterbury affairs.
 Appeared Last Feb.
 He appeared here early last Feb ruary, 1887, in company with Coun- ty Detective Edward H. Hickey, to remove large volume of city rec ords to Hartford for inspection.
 During the investigations by the grand jury he was a daily at tendant at the sessions, and he has been present at all sessions of the conspiracy trial.
 His bills for services, submitted during the grand jury investigation, amounted to several thousands of dollars. No bills for services during the trial have been submitted as yet, according to records.
 MRS. ROOSEVELT