The Waterbury Democrat., 1938-08-29
NatiDe Son Lawyer
 Murray To Testify
tContinued from Page D

claimed any pervious friendship with him.
 Because of the relationship oi client and counsel, the conversations and dealings between Davis ano Murray would ordinarily be consid- cred "privileged". Thus, under the low ~"--"" would be excused from fe tn regard to them.
 hgt L will pave the way fol
 D eak freely, according tc
 plans of Dewey and
 be allowed to give the apa Is of all his conversa- tions with Hines.
 Dewey to Call Murray
 Dewey made 1t plain in his open ing address to the jury that he in- tended to call Murray, by asking each juror individually whether he was aquainted with the famous bar Tister.
 Attorney Murray Is well known in Waterbury. especially since during the past few months he has been appearing in the defense Of Mayor T. Prank Hayes, who has been charged by grand jury with conspiring to defraud that city of more than q million dollars.
 Nine other Connecticut residents are expected to be called as wit nesses soon. The majority are em- ployes of the Barnum and Stratiord hotels, Bridgeport.
 Bridgeport Man Talks
 New York, Aug. 29-(UPJ--CharleS W. Hughes, former hotel manager in Bridgeport, Conn, testified today that he saw Tammany Leader James J. Hines in Bridgeport in 1885 with Dutch Schultz whose $20 GOO 000-a- year policy racket Hines is accused of having protected
 Hughes pointed to Hines and said he had seen him in the lobby of the Hotel Barnum, where Schultz lived for a while in 1885. He said he also had seen Hines, with Schultz and Lulu Rosenkranz, Schultzs body guard, in coffee shop in Bridge port. He placed the time as August or September, 1885.
 The hotel man was called after former Mayor Leslie V. Bateman of Mt. Vernon, N. Y., had testified re- garding conferences with Schultz 1ieutenants who wanted to move the lottery racket headquarters to that suburb when things became too hot for them Tn New York city.
 T told them wasn't interested, , Bateman said.
 Bateman Denies Story
 Bateman was asked about Vein berg's testimony that he had told the gangsters the ministers Of Mt Vernon were demanding a cleanup and that therefore the proposition was risky.
 Y did not" Bateman said, T told them I wasn't interested"
 Charles w. Hughes, of Gardner, Mas, was the next witness. He tcs- tified that from the fall of 1884 to the fall Of 1895 he was assistant manager of the Hotel Barnum in Bridgeport, where Schultz lived for while He identified photographs of Schultz, Davis, Weinberg and Rosenkranz.
 Q. Look around the courtroom and zee If you can zee anyone else you saw in Bridgeport. A. Yes, that man fin the glasses Nndicating Hines). Q. Where did you see him? A. I saw him walking through the lobby of the Hotel Barnum.
 c. Did you see him again? A. Yes saw him in a barber shop with Dutch Schultz and MT. Roscn- kranZ
 Saw Schultz Often
 Hughes said he saw Schultz often in 1895.
 Under croSs-eXamination by Lloyd P. Stryker, chief defense counsel Hughes said he knew Schultz'a identity when he visited the hotel By consulting hotel records Hughes fixed Schultzs visits to the hotel as occurring from August 10 to September B, 1885.
 Q. (By Stryker) Can you gay or what days these two incidents l(Hines' visits) occurred? A. No. Hughes had testified he remcm- bered incidents involving Schultz more vividly than usual because of MH