Montana labor news., 1937-10-07
No. 1886
ALIAS SUMMONS

No. 36966
ALIAS SUMMONS
In the District Court OF the Second Ju-
dicial District Of the State of Montana,
In and Tor the County of Silver Bow.
OSCAR r.. PRlESTER, Plaintiff,
HELEN PRIEsTER, Defendant.
The State of Montana Sends Greeting
to the Above Named Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to answer
the complaint in this action, which is flied
in the office of the Clerk of this Court, a
copy Of which is herewith served upon
you, and to file your answer n serve a
copy thereof upon the PLAINTIFFS attorney
within twenty days after service of this
summons, exclusive of the day Of service
and in case OF your failure - appear or
answer, judgment will be taken against
you by default for the relief demanded
in the complaint, which alleges:
That on or about the 9th aay Of Febru-
AIRY, 1929, in Sligo, Pennsylvania, the PLAIN
tiff and the defendant intermarried, and
ever since said date nave been, and now
are, husband and wife; that there was
born as the issue OF SAID marriage three
children, Joseph and John, twin boys
aged SIX years, u Roy aged four years.
That the plaintiff now is, and has been,
a resident OF the State Of Montana for
more than n year Immediately preced-
ing the commencement OF this action.
That the defendant has been guilty Of
Wilful desertion of plaintiff and which
WIlful descrtlOn has consisted of the fol-
lowing acts, to-Wit: that plaintiff IN or
aIQAl Tic IuiL4 Qdf u JuAAEs 1901 QQG 10
business necessities, was compelled to
change his residence from Rimersburg,
Pennsylvania, where said parties We're
domiciled, to Manhattan, Nevada, and
defendant. Of or about the 5th day Of
August, 1886, refused to remove her habi-
taIOn from Rimersburg, Pennsylvania, to
Manhattan, Nevada, although said town Of
Manhattan was a suitable place for plain
tiff and defendant to make their home;
that ever since the said line the de-
fendant has voluntarily separated herself
from the plaintiff, win the intent to de-
sert the plaintiff, although the plalnt1tt
has often requested defendant to resume
marital relations with him in Manhattan
and other places 10 winch he has moved
ana had his dwelling; that at all of the
lines since the sad marriage OF the PLAIN
tiff and the defendant, the plaintiff has
conducted himself as a dutiful and sup
porting husband Of the defendant and that
1or the full n entire period continuous
~ Tor the space OF more than one year
Immediately preceding the list day of
September, 1881, the defendant has been
guilty of Wilful desertion of the plaintiff;
that such separation Of the defendant
from the plaintiff has never been by plain
tiff's consent and at all times since the
18th day OF August, 1885, the defendant
has voluntarily separated herself from
the plaintiff with intent to desert him
and to abandon all marriage relations with
him, and without his consent.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays that the
bonds OF matfimony existing between
plaintiff and defendant be permanently
and forever dissolved, and for such other
and further relief as to the Court may
seem meet and equitable.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said
Court his 21st day of September, 1887.
ELMER SHEA, Clerk.
4. p. DONOVAN, Deputy Clerk.
(SEAL)
WELLINGTON d. RANKIN,
CHAS. l.. ZIMMERMAN,
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
4l5-l7 Phoenix Bldga Butte, Montana.
First publication September %, 1937.-4T.