Montana labor news., 1937-09-09

AllAD bUNNlONS
In the District Court of the Second Ju-
dicial District of The State of Montana,
In and for the County Of Silver Bow.
CARL ROBERT WILDUNG, Plaintiff,
VS..
MAE LUCINDA WILDUNG, Defendant.
The State OF Montana Sends Greetings
to the Above Named Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to answer
the complaint in this action, which is filed
in the office of the Clerk of this Court, a
copy of which is herewith served upon
you, and to file your ansWer n serve a
copy thereof upon the plaintiffs attorney
within twenty days after the service Of
this summons, exclusive of the day of
service; and in case of your failure to
appear or answer, judgment will be taken
against you by default for the relief de-
Imanded in the complaint, which alleges.
That plaintiff and defendant intermar-
ried in the City of Chicago, Illinois, or
the 4th day of December, 1908, and ever
since said time have been and still are,
husband and wife. That the plaintiff is
and has been for more than one year last
past and Immediately preceding the COM
mencement of this action on the oath day
of August, 1887, an actual and bona fide
resident of the State of Montana. That
there is child living at the present as
issue of said marriage, to-wit, a daughter,
Nina Neal of the age Of twenty-eight
years. now married and not needing the
support of either parent. That the de-
fendant has been guilty of wilful deser-
ton of plaintiff and which wilful deser-
ton has consisted Of the following acts,
to-wit. hat on or about the 4th day of
April, 1926, he plaintiff was compelled,
because of business necessity to change
his residence from Minneapolis, Minnesota,
to Duluth, Minnesota, and defendant re-
fused to remove her habitation from Min
neapolis to Duluth, although said City of
Duluth was a suitable place for plaintiff
and defendant to make their home; that
ever since the said time the defendant
has voluntarily separated herself from the
plaintiff with the intent to desert the
plaintiff, although plaintiff has often re-
quested defendant to resume marital re-
lations with him in Duluth and other
places to which he has moved for bust
ness reasons and had his dwelling; that
! plaintiff continued for a long time after
such desertion by defendant to send
money sufficient for her support and
plaintiff has always been a dutiful and
supporting husband; that for a period OF
more than ten years continuously mex
before the Oath day of August, 1887, the
defendant has been guilty Of Wilful de-
sertion of the plaintiff and such separa-
ton has never been by plaintiffs consent
1926, has been voluntary on the part Of
the defendant with intent to desert plain
tiff and abandon all marital relations with
him, and without his consent.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays that the
bonds of matrimony heretofore and o
existing between plaintiff and defendant
be dissolved and that plaintiff be finally
and forever divorced from defendant.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of sale
Court this 25th day of August, A. d. 1887
ELMER SHEA, Clerk.
By J. M. KRISTICH, Deputy Clerk
COURT SEAL)
II. L, MAURY & A. C. SHONE,
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
32-35 Hirbour Building, Butte, Montana.
First publication August rs, le37.-4T.