Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1937-01-28
Order of Publication

Order of Publication
Farmers Banking and Trust ON
paIy of Montgomery County,
Plaintiff.
James S. Easley, R. Holt Easley,
Elizabeth Boulder Easley,
Defendants.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
MONTGOMERY COUNTY.
No. 8120 Equity.
The object of this suit is to have
a deed of trust from Frank p. Reith-
meyer and Mary C. Reithmeyer, his
wife, to William D. Hill, dated June
%, 1910, recorded among the Land
Records of Montgomery County,
Maryland, in iber PIG, folio 205,
conveying certain land in Montgom-
cry County, cancelled and declared
null and void, and TO remove the
cloud ON the plaintiffs land because
of said deed of trust and to quiet
the title of the plaintiff to said land.
The Bill states in substance: That
the Farmers Banking and Trust
Company of Montgomery County lis
seized and possessed, in fee simple,
of certain land in Montgomery
County, being lots 10 and 20, Block
"Q", of "R. Holt Easley's Silver
Spring Subdivision" according to plat
thereof recorded in Plat Book l.,
plat 60 of said Land Records, said
lots having been conveyed by r. Holt
Easley and wife to Frank P. Reith-
meyer, June 20, 1910, by deed re-
corded among said Land Records in
liber PIG, folio 321. That April
9Th, 1912, said land was sold for
non-payment of taxes by the Treas
urer of Montgomery County to the
late Alexander G. Carlisle and was
conveyed by said Treasurer to said
Carlisle on April IL, 1914, by deed
recorded in liber 242, folio 100; that
Frank P. Reithmeyer, and wife, con-
veyed to said Carlisle their interest
in said land by quit-claim deed dated
March 8, 1923, recorded in iber 1928,
folio 261; that said land was com
veyed to the plaintiff by Albert IN.
Bouic, Trustee of estate of Alex
ander C. Carlisle, by deed dated Aug
/ uoU HOS lO4te 1OCOIA0u I'LL uuDzI tOf,
folio 1859. That the plaintiff and
those under whom it claims, have
paid taxes and claimed and been in
possession of said land for more than
20 years prior to the institution of
this suit. That ON June %, 1910,
Frank P. Reithmeyer and wife con-
veyed said land to William d. Hill
to secure payment of IA promissory
notes payable to the order of r. Holt
Easley, the first z notes being foa
$40. each, and the other 81 notes
being for the sum of Sis. each, all
bearing even date, payable monthly
with interest at SO, said notes being
secured on said land in following
order, to wit, notes due /, 3, 5, q
9, IL, 10, Is, II, 10, 81, %, rs, 81
20, 81, 33, 35, 81 and consecutively
on to IA months after date, inclu-
sive, TO be LIST lien ON said lane
and notes due 2, A, 6, 8, 10, IL, Ia
16, 10, 20, %, "a, 26, %, 80, 80
81 and SO months after date to be 6
End lien ON said property, last ot
said notes failing due August %
1916, as will appear by reference tx
said trust recorded in liber PIG, foil,
POS. That on September 2, 1927
R. Holt Easley filled a petition il
this Court against William D. Hill
alleging that Frank p. Reithmeye.
and wife had executed said deed o.
trust to William D. Hill and tina
..,.. of said notes have been pait
and cancelled, but the remaining =.
notes are still due and unpaid, AM
that the trustee, William D. Hill
had departed this life and praye'
that a substituted trustee be APP
! pointed clothed with same power AM
authority as was vested in said VIM
D. Hill by said TRUST, and the proceed
= ings progressed so far that on No
vember s, 1928, a decree was passet
] substituting as trustee the defend
! ant, James S. Easley, in the plac
of William D. Hill, deceased, as will
appear by reference to No. 400
4 Equity. That the plaintiff is furtheI
advised that Elizabeth Boulder Eas
Z ley, defendant, claims to be tn
holder of the notes represented b!
said trust, the amount and number;
of said notes being unknown to tn,
plaintiff. Your orator AYERS that tht
Lien of said deed of trust is un
enforceable and without validity, We
the defendants, James S. Easley
R. Holt Easley and Elizabeth Boul
den Easley are asserting and claim
ing a right to said land on account
thereof; that such assertion anC
claiming that said deed of TRUST is
lien on said land constitutes 8
cloud upon the title of your orator
to same and interferes with the sale
thereof and your orator is remedi.
less in the premises without the aic
and intervention of this Honorable
Court. That the defendants are %
full age and non-residets of the State
of Maryland.
It is ordered this 9th day of Jan.
uary, in the year 1887, by the Cir.
cult Court for Montgomery County
sitting as a Court of Equity, that
the plaintiff by causing a copy ot
this order to be inserted in some
newspaper published in Montgomery
County once in each of successive
weeks before the 9th day of Feb.
ruary, 1887, giving notice to the
absent defendants, James s. Easley
R. Holt Easley and Elizabeth Boul-
den Easley, of the object and sub
stance of this Bill, warning them