Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1937-01-21
Order of Publication

IOruer Oh FuDllCaClOn
Farmers Banking and Trust ON
pany of Montgomery County,
Plaintiff.
James S. Easley, r. Holt Easley,
Elizabeth Boulder Easley,
Defendants.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
MONTGOMERY COUNTY.
No. 8120 Equity.
The object of this sI1it is to have
Ia deed of trust from Frank p. Reith-
meyer and Mary &c. Reithmeyer, his
wife, to William D. Hill, dated June
%, 1910, recorded among the Land
Records of Montgomery County,
Maryland, in hlber 219, folio 205,
conveying certain land in Montgom-
cry County, cancelled and declared
null and void, and to remove the
cloud ON the plaintiffs land because
of said deed of trust and to quiet
the title of the plaintiff to said land.
The Bill states in substance: That
the Farmers Banking and Trust
Company of Montgomery County lis
seized and possessed, in fee simple,
of certain land in Montgomery
County, being lots Is and 20, Block
"Q", of "R. Holt Easley's Silver
Spring Subdivision" according to plat
thereof recorded in Plat Book /,
plat 60 of said Land Records, said
lots having been conveyed by r. Holt
Easley and wife to Frank P. Reith-
meyer, June 20, 1910, by deed re-
corded among said Land Records in
liber ZIG, folio 321. That April
9th, 1912, said land was sold for
non-payment of taxes by the Treas
urer of Montgomery County to the
late Alexander G. Carlisle and was
conveyed by said Treasurer to said
Carlisle on April IL, 1914, by deed
recorded in liber PAP, folio 100; that
Frank P. Reithmeyer, and wife, con-
veyed to said Carlisle their interest
in said land by quit-claim deed dated
March 8, 1923, recorded in hber 1928,
folio 261; that said land was con-
veyed to the plaintiff by ALBERT I'M.
Bouic, Trustee of estate of Alex
ander &c. Carlisle, by deed dated Aug
ust 20, 1927, recorded in liber 434,
folio 469. That the plaintiff and
those under whom it claims, have
paid taxes and claimed and been i'm
possession of said land for more than
20 years prior to the institution of
this suit. That ON June %, 1910,
Frank P. Reithmeyer and wife con-
veyed said land to William d. Hill
to secure payment of IA promissory
notes payable to the order of r. Holt
Easley, the first z notes being fou
$40. each, and the other 81 notes
being for the sum of Sis. each, all
bearing even date, payable monthly
with interest at so, said notes being
secured ON said land in following
order, to wit, notes due 1, 8, 5, q
9, Ii, 13, 15, II, 10, 81, %, rs, 81,
%, 81, 33, 35, 81 and consecutively
on to IA months after date, inclu-
sive, TO be LIST lien ON said land
and notes due 2, A, 6, 8, 10, IL, Ia
16, Is, 20, %, "a, rs, %, 80, 49,
"a and SO months after date to be a
End lien ON said property, last OF
said notes falling due August 23
1916, as will appear by reference to
said TRUST recorded in liber 219, folio
2O5. That ON September 2, 1927,
R. Holt Easley filled a petition in
this Court against William D. Hill,
alleging that Frank P. Reithmeyer
and wife had executed said deed of
trust to William d. Hill and that
80. of said notes have been paid
and cancelled, but the remaining
notes are still due and unpaid, and
that the trustee, William D. Hill
had departed this life and prayed
that a substituted trustee be APP
pointed clothed with same power and
authority as was vested in said VIM.
D. Hill by said trust, and the proceed
ings progressed so far that on No
vember 8, 1928, decree was passed
substituting as trustee the defend
ant, James S. Easley, in the place
of William D. Hill, deceased, as will
appear by reference to No. 1907
Equity. That the plaintiff is further
advised that Elizabeth Boulder Eas-
ley, defendant, claims to be the
holder of the notes represented by
said trust; the amount and numbers
of said notes being unknown to the
plaintiff. Your orator AYERS that the
lien of said deed of trust is I'M
enforceable and without validity, yet
the defendants, James S. Easley,
r. Holt Easley and Elizabeth Boul-
den Easley are asserting and claim
ing a right to said land on account
thereof; that such assertion and
claiming that said deed of TRUST lis
lien on said land constitutes a
cloud upon the title of your orator
to same and interferes with the sale
thereof and your orator is remedi-
less in the premises without the aid
and intervention of this Honorable
Court. That the defendants are Of
full age and non-residets of the State
of Maryland.
1t is ordered this 9th day of JAN
uary, in the year 1887, by the Cir
cult Court for Montgomery County,
sitting as a Court Of Equity, that
the plaintiff by causing a copy of
this order to be inserted in some
newspaper published in Montgomery
County once in each Of successive
weeks before the 9Th day of Feb
ruary, 1887, giving notice to the
absent defendants, James s. Easley,
r. Holt Easley and Elizabeth Boul-
den Easley, of the object and sub
stance of this Bill, warning them
to appear in this Court, in person or
by solicitor. ON or before the 23rd