The Waterbury Democrat., 1937-04-16
Dates For Stay Of
 Officers Here Set
 Wrong Unknowingly
Nh Action Taken on Measue at Legislature Yesterday; Edward WeIch Marries Emma Pratt in New Haven;
 Agreement on Budget Expected Tonight
NAUGATUCK

NauVatuck, April 16.-Unexpecteo .,,,,osition to the biennial election Iii concerning Naugatuck when s sI inc state legislature croppeo up 1asterday. it was learned today from penreseatatiye Joseph Jackson. The ., .as,,re had passed the senate anu .fSar senate passage it was olscoV- ared that somebody had placed tne 1n. ,ne. dates for stay of ofncers ol ,eoro,,oh in their office. June 50 was given in the bill passed Dy sne serate as the date for termmatiot, of tI,e terms of present officers ana 1,,,v as the start of the new oi- 6ctrs, terms. This was not done py anvhody locally, Naugatuck offlclas l. ve stated.
 The bill was starred for action ny f. house on the calendar yesterqay ard Representative Jackson hao two a,oendments ready, changing tne da.e of termination of office to elec- t",n day and date for the start ol z new terms to the day after eiec- ton.
 However. no action was taken on . measure yesterday ana tnls n .,rn,ng 1t was exactly in the same S,os.tion as it occupied yesteroay m .,rn.ng, tha5 is, starred TOT acVlon'
 Mfr Jackson said he was inform ed by a house leader that let1el hed been received recently rom a nrominont Naugatuck republican, anJ that the latter asked clause = king the bill approved subject to . referendum vote here, be attacn- eI. s
 Mr Jackson said he told the lead g that 8 referendum vote hao ai- ready been taken here ana appfov,,,, ,,, ed After local sponsors of the pii, h attended meeting several .,,ecks ago of the committee oi t"wns cities and boroughs of the
 After local sponsors of the bill nao ...erded meeting several weeks ago of the committee ot toWils' cites and boroughs of the leglsia, tI. ', at which this and tne oca. @ sa nv increase bill came up TOT 11aaTi1,p. they felt from the attltuoe of fine committee that the piennlai S. would not be returned for an o,rn referendum vote as there was 1;1+tn % discussion on this phase ana Inc The legislature had approved ol- ennial elections for many oe,.el towns with no re1ereho"" N quised. . ...;.n
 1 Mfr Jackson planned today W ,,roa immediate action on the plii' A referendum clause has been at- 4a he'd to the salary bill and ii the residents here approve the measure 1t will go into ef1ect Haiheai"'e'' a.;er the election. .ton-
 Many local residents are watcn. ing the proceedings with interest so sae @ whether the biennial measure w;;1 | he altered to have a re1eren- S,r, attached. The fact the mouse strongly republican does noe a,,c,,r too well for the hopes o1 tne so democratic representatives. | UMmGTGUCG CARAs
 { Difference in insurance proVisiolis r.-de in the MeadowbrooK nome and town hall sections Of the pro. ,osed welfare department nuogeI mrre explained today by Supt. Leo Sc,,i,v In the $65, 900 budget asKeo hv the welfare department there s ,,r,vision for $98 for insurance III fhe Meadowbrook home section, s'io S, O5O for the town hall insurance. Supt. Scully explained that e.iess no,ints vary from year to year as rarso,,s policies fall due. Last year s, Meadowbrook home for example' ac.ording M to MT. Scully, the insur- =, .e on all the buildings and 1urc .,,t,,re there came due due and $45o Mc. expended. This year there are onlv the boiler insurance ana saw m. iasurances coming que so oiiiy so3 is asked. MT. Scully expiaMeo that the saw mill, unlike the oullo- 1 sn.s and other things on MeadoW- i,rook home. can only be insured TOT on. year at a time.
 Tie town hall insurance also va, r,es. he said. Last year $47l was pau o,,t m insurance and this year more ins,,rances are coming due than last vear so the $1,050 is required oe-
 red. He said he figured the lnsuf- ance items very closely. Casual reading of the proposed fip1Ires for the Meadowbrook home Insurance item this year and the town hall would indicate a wide discrepancy, so MT. Scully's ex- nlanstion was asked. He stressed the fact that the varying of insurance due is the reason for the apparent difference.