Montgomery County sentinel. [volume] (Rockville, Md.) 1855-1974, 1937-02-04
Order of Publication

O1uC1 vi Il uU11NQC1U1k
Farmers Banking and Trust ON
pany of Montgomery County,
Plaintiff.
James S. Easley, R. Holt Easley,
Elizabeth Boulder Easley,
Defendants.
IN TILE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
MONTGOMERY COUNTY.
No. 8120 Equity.
The object of this suit is to have
a deed of trust from Frank p. Reith-
meyer and Mary C. Reithmeyer, his
wife, to William D. Hill, dated June
%, 1910, recorded among the Land
Records of Montgomery County,
Maryland, in lber 219, folio POS,
conveying certain land in Montgom-
cry County, cancelled and declared
null and void, and to remove the
cloud on the plaintiffs land because
of said deed of trust and to quiet
the title of the plaintiff to said land.
The Bill states in substance: That
the Farmers Banking and Trust
/ Company of Montgomery County lis
seized and possessed, in fee simple,
of certain land in Montgomery
County, being lots 10 and 20, Block
co., of "R. Holt Easley's Silver
Spring Subdivision" according to plat
thereof recorded in Plat Book /,
plat SO of said Land Records, said
lots having been conveyed by R. Holt
Easley and wife to Frank P. Reith-
meyer, June 20, 1910, by deed re-
corded among said Land Records in
hber ZIG, folio 321. That April
9th, 1912, said land was sold for
non-payment of taxes by the Treas
urer of Montgomery County to the
late Alexander G. Carlisle and was
conveyed by said Treasurer to said
Carlisle on April IL, 1914, by deed
recorded in liber PAP, folio 100; that
Frank P. Reithmeyer, and wife, con-
veyed to said Carlisle their interest
in said land by quit-claim deed dated
March 8. 1928, recorded in hber 1928
folio 261; that said land was CON
veyed to the plaintiff by Albert M
Bouic, Trustee of estate of Alex.
: ander G. Carlisle, by deed dated Aug
ust 20, 1927, recorded in hber 434
, folio 469. That the plaintiff anc
those under whom it claims, have
paid taxes and claimed and been In
: possession of said land for more thar
20 years prior to the institution Oh
this suit. That on June %, 1910
, Frank P. Reithmeyer and wife con
veyed said land to William D. Hill
to secure payment of IA promissory
: notes payable to the order OF r. Holt
Easley, the first notes being fou
$40. each, and the other 81 notes
: being for the sum of SIS. each, al
, bearing even date, payable monthly
, with interest at go, said notes being
secured ON said land in following
order, to wit, notes due /, 8, 5, z
9, IL, 13, 15, II, 10, 81, %, 25, 81
20, 81, 33, SIS, 81 and consecutively
.. on to "a months after date, inclu.
sive, to be a LIST lien ON said LAND
and notes due 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, IL, Ia
16, 18, 20, %, "a, 26, %, 80, 80
, 81 and SO months after date to be 8
End lien ON said property, last Cd
said notes failing due August %
, 1916, as will appear by reference tt
said TRUST recorded in liber 219, folis
205. That on September 2, 1927
R. Holt Easley filled a petition in
this Court against William D. Hill
alleging that Frank P. Reithmeye1
and wife had executed said deed Cd
trust to William D. Hill and thai
.... of said notes have been paiG
and cancelled, but the remaining
notes are still due and unpaid, anc
that the trustee, William D. Hill
had departed this life and prayed
. that a substituted trustee be APP.
pointed clothed with same power anc
authority as was vested in said VIM
|, d. Hill by said TRUST, and the proceed.
ings progressed 50 far that on No.
vember 8, 1928, decree was passed
substituting as trustee the defend.
ant, James S. Easley, in the place
of William D. Hill, deceased, as will
appear by reference to No. 1907
Equity. That the plaintiff is further
advised that Elizabeth Boulder Eas-
ley, defendant, claims to be the
holder of the notes represented by
said trust, the amount and numbers
OF said notes being unknown to the
plaintiff. Your orator AYERS that the
liCIi VI ot1I0 u0ou VI CruSC Is UNI
enforceable and without validity, vet
the defendants, James s. Easley
r. Holt Easley and Elizabeth Boul-
den Easley are asserting and claim
ing right to said land on account
thereof; that such assertion and
claiming that said deed of TRUST is
a lien on said land constitutes q
cloud upon the title of your orator
to same and interferes with the sale
thereof and your orator is remedi-
less in the premises without the aid
and intervention of this Honorable
Court. That the defendants are of
full age and non-residets of the State
of Maryland.
i It is ordered this 9Th day of JAN
uary, in the year 1897, by the Cir
cult Court for Montgomery County,
sitting as a Court Of Equity, that
the plaintiff by causing copy of
this order to be inserted in some
newspaper published in Montgomery
County once in each of A successive
weeks before the 9th day of Feb
ruary, 1887, giving notice to the
absent defendants, James S. Easley,
R. Holt Easley and Elizabeth Boul-