The Waterbury Democrat., 1937-10-20


 police were called to his fashion able Bel Air home.
 ward Mraz, assistant registrars.
 9th District-James Morrow, mod orator; Peter Ciacci and L. J. Vib- bert, assistant registrars.
 7th District - Walter Monagan, moderator; John Burns and Leroy Gibbs, assistant registrars.
 9th District-Ivan Coulter, mod orator; Jeremiah Barry and Thomas Corby, assistant registrars.
 9th District-Frank Healey, mod orator; Joseph Davis and Richard Wood, assistant registrars.
 10th District - Arthur Green, moderator; Edward Kelly and William Keenan, assistant regis trars.
 11th Distrlct-Thomas Fitzmau- rice, moderator; Eugene Shortell and Albert Bronsky, assistant registrars.
 18th District-Leo Pepin, moder- ator; Edward Keenan and Paul Lord, assistant registrars.
 18th District - John Delaney, moderator; James Leary and Stanley Lusas, assistant regis- trars.
 14th District - Dennis Carey, moderator; Patrick Reardon and Francis Underhill, assistant regis trars.
 18th District - Michael Hayes, moderator; William Ryder and John J. Brown, assistant regis trars.
 18th District - Jeremiah Riley, moderator; Joseph Bergin and Le- roy Crosby, assistant registrars.
 17th District-William Cunning ham, moderator; Patrick Doran and Charles Berube, assistant reg istrars.
 IS District - John Crosse mod erator; William Carroll and Sam uel Mccormick, assistant regis trarS.
 18th District - Arthur Wengerts- man, moderator; Joseph Bowen and Earl Hartley, assistant regis trars.
 20th District - Fremont Alderson, moderator; John Fitzgerald and George Towles, assistant regis trarS.
 The Independent Democrat chal- lengers with one or two still to be appointed, are as follows: 1st, Harry Baumel; 2d, Joseph Gian- etti; Sd, John McLinden; 4th, John } Cavanaugh; 5th, Leo Manganaro; 9th, Peter Coffey; 7th, James Bull ger; 8th, John Capanno; 9th, Les ter Lonergan; 10th, Michael Mi- kalunas; llth, Joseph Mobile; 18th, Charles Popikas; l4th, Michael Goggins: 18th, William Conley; 18th, Raymond Fran; l7th, Joseph 1ppolito; 18th, Harold Maloney; 18th, Edward Kiernan. Recanvass Of Machines The hearing opened today after a struggle yesterday by the cor poration counsel to change various portions of the complaint, ending with motion to quash which Judge Dickenson denied for reasons here- after quoted. AS indicated by The Democrat last week, the court has shown tendency to undertake su- pervision of @ recanvass of the ma chimes.
 This was apparent when Judge Dickenson allowed applications for restraining orders which concerned election records. He suggested an agreement of counsel whereby the machines became the temporary property of the court, making them, as he referred to them yesterday, exhibits"
 Thus, in the custody of the clerk of the superior court, the machines and records have been part of the mandamus evidence" since a week ago. In yesterdays proceedings, the judge evidenced interest in what disposition would be made of the records following closing of the court case.
 Further Litigation
 This may mean that, unless there is a very great amount of evidence to support finding of illegallties WIllCLl WOulu LGouAt III oUCkJo UOWdEu ordering a new election, Judge Dickenson foresees further litiga- ton as to who will keep the elec- ton sheets and moderators' books after he rules on the mandamus. This line of reasoning points either to a recanvass of the machines with q finding that their counters do not effect any considerable change in the moderators' reports, or further legal action by the complainants toward obtaining the aforemention- ed new election.
 Bridgeport Election
 The fact that Judge Dickenson already has found that the Bridge port election decision, referred to in his denial of the motion to quash, as a basis on which to make cer- tain rulings in the Waterbury case favoring the complainants tends to support the reasoning that the court is interested in a "clear-cut de- termination" of the Waterbury election under its supervision. This, too, favors the seven defeated can. didates, as so adjudged by the moderator's figures.
 The proceedings on the manda mus have aroused interest of majority of Waterbury's most emi. nent members of the bar. At yes- terday's proceedings two former