The producers news. [volume] (Plentywood, Mont.) 1918-1937, 1936-02-28
WINS
Washingpn

Supreme Court anS ;, late Of 4.
those very able iur tH the first % y
ed that the consists 5itSts who insi.%s
made amendable to C,' Soo? must !.
IN his stimulating n TGclal changes
ION used to speaI minority decis1
culate major premise me "ha1,
He was referring :.
the mould in which, 81 u course, IA
| som some Of f. his colleagues s mi minds q
pletely framed Their rD ot1., 50 com.
WARDS %Sras the struggle be ftaSaae TO-
spite of genuine effo oS4E that II
the issue impartiaIIv1 - 10 70 decide
IONS favored the oppre sso1r d deej',
ticulate major PREMISE same me. "nac
Deem the basis of the ren must nave
S examiner of National L ya5c Of tn the
S 0Oaru' AIphonse G. Fbe %'
9, In his report on the e' I pos
anoe Go; plant at Salem, n TIfOT1
lists evidence of the moat II, he
ing nature against the he's co Damn
m N It's 6 relations with the 'IT oc52I y
the the Boot and Shoe Workers 'T Tiai.ot
Yet intimidation to Ebo,Io onlOn'
apparently the president 'V 81 means Al
company coming individually we ne
each worker with a club and 81 70
ing, eff you join the unior1 say 4E
beat you with this club Ol' III
The economic club held br IL,
president of the comna T w tIe %
power to say which men SHAH bo Ms
1000 and clothing for themsa aIros
and their families and which 1V mes
shall not, is no real menace -'t -
examiner Eberle. A spv in tbo
pant shopping around in the guics
OF a candy salesman and re So,s'
ing to the boss the activities YrJ
attitudes Of the workers, tbowing
INTO the men and women At tbo
the most horrible fear
Of all, that of not trusting vo our
OWN companions, did not co1Ji.
'ute intimidation either.
Nor could Eberle see where
company telling group of men
financially interested in the con.
'lnued operation of that COMPANY
nat they would like to continue
)ut the union was in the way, con.
itltuted any inducement BY the
company to the group of men.
Surely Eberle believes in he
'rofit motive.
That inability to perceive The
azure of the struggle between
workers fighting for a chance to
we decently and companies tight.
ng for a chance to get the product
I labor as cheaply as pc STOLE 50
hat profits may rise has caused
tners than Eberle to take che
7rong turning. So much can be
'ranted the examiner in a spirit
f charity.
But charity is not a major vir-
ne among those fighting to live.
"The people can change the Con-
ress but only God can change the
upreme Court"
The venerable George Norris.
lthOr Of the twenty-first cCnsti-
ltional amendment, and vigOlOu
glitter for human rights, those
lings about which everybody
Ilks nowadays but does little, On
le floor of the senate poured
nth his wrath against the hlgh'
It tribunal in the land.
George Norris is now an Ola
an. In his late seventies ne mas
en- many sessions Of congress
me and go, many decisions o.
e Supreme Court handed doNn
it'll the solemnity Of a circus
announcing the japan
e trio on the highwire.
All of those things for when aS
ught, liberalism, decency "
eatment of men, a sane Worla y y
lich hunger and nakednesSs 81
It the result of too much lO w.
d too many pairs of pants ~
w sees as swept away Oy .,j
odgy group of six old men 'n'
supine administration. Gem.
"Onlv God can change the guy
me Court" ,1..,ie
The last hope of George NOT ~
2 man who voted agalnst ar.
lited States entry into tne %
e venerable fighter for pug he
of public utilities s,, IN
aunch rock of real Liberalism r q
2 republican party Of HaiuI last