The Waterbury Democrat., 1936-08-26
Lindbergh BabyCase
 Trial Is Denounced
tContinued from Page D

| Defense lawyer Reilly likewise was criticized for his activities ai Q magazine writer.
 "1n the issue of Liberty of oct. 6 1o36, appeared an article entitled 'Will Lindbergh Save Hauptmann7 by Edward J. Reilly. Stripped oi all rhetoric, the article was an ar' gument to the public that the guil of Hauptinann was not proven.
 "The case was at that time pend. ing on appeal in the New Jersey court of errors and appeals, af1t the question of the proof of Haupt. inann's guilt was an issue on the appeal. Mir. Reilly had retired from the case but that fact does mol change the situation much. In out opinion it Is grossly improper for ar attorney, whether still fin the ca5t or not, or whether he had ever been in the case or not, to 90 before the public before the conclusion of the case with an argument on the i1ler. it's of the case. It is otlr opinion Al. 50 that no magazine should Do per. rnitted to publish such an argument at such timc."
 Wllentx Defended
 Attorney-genera Wiientz was dc. tended vigorously against the re. ports Implied criticism" of hii prosecution of Hauptmann.
 Wilentz built c monument fol himself for dignity, ability end fair. ness" in his handling of the case Colonel Mayer 0. Goldman, New York attorney, told 260 delegatel who had just listened to q specia report condemning alleged abusel in the trial.
 Because time for discussion oi the subject was limited by c vote at the opening of the meeting, only Goldman was heard ct the coi- cluSion of Hallafn's report.
 T don't believe he should Dc made to stand for criticism for what Judge Hallam did not say" Gold. man said. Any implied criticism of the attorney-general should not be allowed to stand"
 Movement for q star chamber session for presentation and discuss sion of the Hauptmann report wa defeated. It was sought by Miss Emma D. Dillon of Trenton, N. !. executive secretary of the New Jersey bar association.
 Praises TrenChard
 Judge Hallaf1 gaid he had "Oflly words of praise" for Justice Thoni- as W. Trenchard, who presided at the trial, and the jury. Trenchard he said. received "only indifferent cooperation" from court officers.
 There should De no dramatiza. ton of crime" he asserted.
 Tomorrow Bakers committee on cooperation between the press, Tad. 10 and bar against publicity inter. fering with fair trial Of judicial and quasi judicial proceedings" vii make q progressive" report to the general assembly.
 Conclusions of Report
 Tn concluding his report Judge Hallam recommended:
 "That attendance in the court room during the progress of c crin' inal trial be limited to the seating capacity of the room.
 That the process of subpoena oI any other process of the court should never be used to secure pre- ferential admission of any persor or spectator; that such abuSe Of pro cess be punished aS contempt.
 That approaches to the court room be kept clear, to the end that free access to the courtroom b( maintained.
 That no use Of cameras or otheI photographic appliance be permitted in the courtroom, either during tht session of the court or otherwise.
 That no sound registering de- vices for publicity use be permitted to operate in the courtroom at af1S time.
 That the surreptitlouS procure ment of pictures or sound recordi be considered contempt of court an( punished as such.
 That during the trial of criTn' inal case the courtroom and th' courthouse be kept free from new distributing devices and equipment
 That newspaper accounts of criFn' inal proceedings be limited to ac' counts of occurrences in court with out argument of the case to th' public.
 That no popular referendum b' taken during the pendency of th' litigation as to the guilt or iSiSio' cence of the accused.
 That broadcasting of arguments giving out of argumentative presl bulletins, and every other form ol argument of discussion addressed tt the public, by lawyers in the caS' during the progress of the litiga' ton be definitely forbidden. M
 '-rhat public criticism of th' court or jury by lawyers in the cast during the progress of the litigation be not tolerated.