Montana labor news., 1936-08-13
No. 36I55
tIfh[ EflNdAnhC


in the District Court OF the Second Judicial
District OF the State OF Montana. in and
Tor the county oil Silver Bow.
SUSIE BArlNOlI, Plaintiff.
vs..
NELSON bArROTT, Defendant.
The state OF Montana Sends Greetings to
the Above Named Defendant:
lou are hereby summoned to answer the
Complaint III this action. which is Tiled in
The ofnce Oh the Clerk OF this Court, a copy
OF which is herewith served upon you, anu
10 flie your answer and serve "a copy there
OF upon the plaintiffs attorney within ~
Gays after the service of this summons, ex-
elusive OF the day OF service; and in case
OF your failure to appear or answer, judg-
menr will be taken against you by default
for the relef demanded in the complaint
which complaint reads as follows. to-wit.
mat pia4ntff Is now and tor more than
one year next preceding the 10Th day OF
july, a. u, 100, the cate OF the filing OF
ms complaint has been an actual anu bona
noe resilient OF the ouate OF Montana.
mat pldintHf and defendant lntermarrled
at Browning, Montana, on or about July 70.
iS5t, ana ever since said time have been
and now are husband and wife.
That as the issue oil said marriage there
Is one MINOR cnllu, James Frederick bar
rorr, OF the age OF four years. now in the
CUSTODY OF plaintiff and plaintiff alleges that
she IS a tit and proper person to have the
care, custody and control OF said minor
cnI4d, anu that because OF the facts here
- 49, 49, -
proper person to have the care, custody OF
eontroi OF SAID minor child.
mat aeienaanr has been guilty OF will
fai assertion OF plaintiff, which said wiltul
assertion has consisted Oh the following
acts, to-wit. That during the month OF
November, iy34, defendant voluntarily sep
arated himself IRON plaintiff with the intent
90 ana aIu desert plaintiff and ever Stree
SAID time has hved separate and apart from
piaintifI ali oil which was without cause
or provocation upon the part OF plaintiff,
anu was without the consent and against
the VIII ana wish OF plaintiff, and which
sa4a aesertion has continued Tor the space
u more Lnan one year before luly 10, 1880.
che cate OF the iIling Of this complaint.
lnat defendant is a healthy able-bodieo
man, a service station attendant by occupa-
VOL, caPaD4e OF earning the sum OF SfZ5.Ut
per lloaln. mat the sum OF S3O.UU pei
inonln 10 a sum necessary and proper tc
De awarded plaIntiFf as alimony Tor the
support oi SAID minor child.
WttA-iNGr JIM painful prays Judgment
lhat the ponus u matrlnony hereloiort
a4iu now existing between plaintiff and de-
ieaaalc DC dissolved anu forever set aside
anu eacn Oh The parties relieved from al
u tie opLsaaons resulting theretrom, save
ana except lnat defendant be required to
pay tur the support and maintenance oil
salu minor chIu, James Frederick Barrotti
enat pialneni be gwen the care, custody anc
contfot OF saio MINOR child and that shs
De dwaroed almCny in the sum OF S3U.Ot
per moutn iof tne care support and main
eehaire Vi salu minor child, and tor sucf
otnef anu Iu4tnel reliel as to the Couri
ntay seem equitable and Just in the pre-.
misses.
Witness my hand and the seal OF sale
~oate' eais tom Jay OF July. A. D., 1870
NCOCNi EAL
a.. 4. nELLY. Clerk.
by =. II, oULLtVAN, Dep Clerk.
~ iLLiFAu WE / ER,
Attorney Ior Plaintiff,
~ pennsylvania Blk,
butte, montana.
rlfer publication July %. l936-4T.