The Waterbury Democrat., 1935-02-07
De Bisschop Took
 he Stand To-day
tContinued from Page 1t

I edge of mysterious package ot | letters or documents which Fisck Is supposed to have left with his l sister. Manley said he arrived at the | Fredericksen bakery about 8:15 D. m. on March 1, 1892.
 "Whom did you zee there""' | asked Reilly. That man." said Manlcy, point ing to Hauptmann. A three-foot limb of tree, It's ! branches stripped lay under the de- fense table as the afternoon ses- sion began. Uhlig resumed the stand. c. (By Reilly)--Do you recall the day you sailed with F'isch? 1 A. I think 1t was the 18th day of December 1933J. 1 c. Were you at his home Cir Germany the day he was taken to the hospital? A. Yes. c. Did you at any time see F1sch give his sister, any papers? A. No
 c. You know his sister?
 A. Yes.
 c. That was In Leipzig?
 A. Yes.
 c. Did you ever say you were present when Fisch gave papers to his sister?
 He's your witness, MT Reilly. said Justice Trenchard after Wilentz had objected to the form of question.
 "Yes," but 1 intend to show he is a hostile witness," Reilly replied.
 c. After Fisch died you went back to Hauptmann and tried to get the bundles he had left?
 A. Yes.
 Q. He wouldn't give them to you would he? A. No.
 c. Where did you go?
 A. We went to the garage and saw the suitcases.
 c. You didn't take them did you? A. No. .... ......,.
 Q. You wanted particularly q small box?
 The states objection to the ques- | tion was sustained. c. Fisch had been educated in Saxony. hadn't he? A. Yes.
 Q. He wrote in a Saxon script, didn't he?
 An answer was prevented by Justice Trenchard's stern dcclara- tion that this Is very leading question, MT Reilly"
 Reilly tried to get the vii ness to say that another fur cutter, named Kern, lived in Brooklyn. 5. | Hauptmann kept his eyes glued on the witness. Reilly asked the state for the second ransom note. .. In your business connections with Fisch did you ever see him write or print anything? A. Yes. Reilly showed the envelope of the second note. Q. Does that resemble Fisch's printing?
 The court said the witness might answer the question If he knows" A. No, don't know.
 Reilly ended his direct examina- ton and Wllentz excused him with single question.
 Q. Fisch was an American citizen, wasn't he? A. Yes.
 Walter Manley was the next witness.
 Q. You live In the Bronx? A. Yes. Q. You know FrederIcksep's bak- cry? A. Yes.
 c. You know the Fredericksen' f quite well? A. Yes.
 c. On March l. 1892 were yor in the bakery? A. Yes.
 Q. Did you see Mrs Hauptmanr there? A. Yes.
 c. Did you see anybody elne there? A. eYs-that man there MT Hauptmann. Polnting).
 c. Now Mr Manlcy, you told ( man what you saw and he con. tacted me? A. Yes.
 c. You have been fl? A. Yes
 C. Did you come from sich bed 10 testifyY A. Yes.
 Your witneSs.' said Reilly. wi. lentz cross examined. c. Did you know Mrs Haupt. mann before March 1882? A. Yes since 1928.
 c. You knew Hauptmann? A. knew him that night. .. You are able to read are you not? A. Oh yes. c. In 1884 did you see pictures In the newspapers of the Haupi- manns? A. Yes. c. Did you notify the authori- ties at thath time? 4. No.
 Q. What time did you go there ? A. At S:t5.
 c. How long did you stay? 4. Four or five minutes.
 C. You are sick man 4. Yes.
 That's all," said Wilentz and the witness was excused.