The Ely miner. [volume] (Ely, Minn.) 1895-1986, 1935-11-07
(QulI'idiaa194IS 5jjjq1e(k{
National Topics Interpreted "a G1IMA1N2
by William Bruckart TTHNTfX
PressB D.

heavy taxpayers In every community
they serve. Laying aside the question
of merit or lack of merit in the propo-
sition of government ownership of
railroads, no municipality can afford to
overlook the loss of tax receipts that
would follow government acquisition
of those carrier properties. They pay
real estate taxes in the United States
annually of more than three hundred
million dollars. OF course it, is dis
tributed in thousands Of places but
whatever the amount may be in your
community or any other, it represents
a tax source which the local govern
ment can i'll afford to lose.
1t is the same, although to lesser
degree, with respect to the housing
project. In this statement mean only
as to the local tax phase. 1t has,
however, another very important tax
angle. Property, or the income from
property, everywhere is subjected to
three tax assessments. First, the
county or city in which the property is
located takes a tax toll; second, the
state gets share, and thirdly, the
federal government either by income
or some other tax gets its hand into
the pocket of a property owner.
In the case of the low cost housing
project, it was necessary to calculate
the rental rate on base so low that
it would be impossible for the total
receipts to pay off the government in
vestment. This had to be done if the
low cost housing was to be supplied
at rate the poorer classes could
pay. 1t is seen, therefore, that there
was a deficit staring the project
in the face. To meet this deficit GER
tain federal funds were to be set aside
regularly which, coupled with the re-
ceipts from the tenants, would serve
to amortize the original cost. From
the standpoint of liquidating the cost
not impress one as being so whole
some when it is shown that the gov
ernment's contribution comes out of the
general fund of the Treasury which in
turn comes out of the general taXpay-
ers of the nation.
And so it is with great many 9TH
er of the experiments where such pro-
grams place government-owned agen-
cies or industries in competition with
citizens. Take the Tennessee Valley
hydro-electric project for another ex-
ample. The federal government has
placed more than $131, 100000 in that
venture. The present Tennessee VAL
ley Corporation has taken over these
properties at about one-third of this
amount-a net loss to the government.
But that is not all. The vast project
that has been developed in the Ten
nessee valley and through the adjoin-
ing counties and cities is not subject
to state taxation nor do the cities that
electricity get any taxes from this
source. 1t may be sound in the theory
but l am fearful that the inbred op-
position to federal government en-
croachment on local affairs sooner or
later will cause new explosion. 1t
will come from the original feeling
that states rights ought to be superior
to federal rights except where states
have delegated that authority to the
federal government in the national
Constitution.
Earlier in this discussion / men
toned the ruling by Comptroller Gen.
eral McCarl who act
Always ed, of course, as the
the Goat head of the general
accounting off C e d.
This agency was created with a very
definite purpose in mind. Congress
wanted some independent group or
authority to watch all federal expend-
itures to make certain that they were
made in accordance with law. A good
many years ago when this job was
done by the comptroller of the treas
ury, it was not infrequent that an ad-
verse ruling by the comptroller put
the comptroller in tough spot. Once
or twice when comptroller refused
to change his ruling, there was new
comptroller appointed.
Mr.. McCarl is not popular. Private
ly and publicly, he has been criticized,
sometimes in language hardly print
able. These complaints always have
come from someone whose idea of
spending money was found by Mr.. Nc
Carl not to be In accordance with the
law. Always, he was the goat.
He has been the goat much more
under the New Deal than ever before.
Every time he kicks over a New Deal
plan, the sponsors of that plan brand
him as a Tory or Reactionary or as
being just plain dumb. He has en-
gagged in controversy with none of
them. He has contended that his de-
cisions were rendered in accordance
with the law which he was directed
by congress to construe. But it is true
of all humans. When a pet plan is
destroyed. one tries to find somebody
upon whom the blame can be pinned.
The real answer to this situation is
that President Roosevelt has insisted
usually on having his New Deal bills
drafted by men in the executive
branches of the government They
have been sent to congress and con-
gress has been told to pass them as
they were written. Since most of the
bills were drafted by men without leg
islative experience some with too
little experience of any kind-natur-
ally they have been full of legal holes.
holes through which one could drive q