The Waterbury Democrat., 1935-01-28
False Reports OF Fin anciaL Status
tcontinued from Fase l,

Om Page ID
 sage of newspapermen. witnesses and officials, but the crush outside the doors of the court was terri flc.
 Hauptmann was brought into court 20 minutes early. He wore the usual gray-brown suit, blue shirt and blue necktie.
 Did you have q good week end?" Hauptmann was asked.
 "Yes, the usual good sieep." he replied.
 Are you worried about thero Diaries of your that Attorney Gen. eral Wilentz says he has?"
 He shook his head.
 Story Of Wife Denied.
 Philadelphia. Jan 2s (UP)--The Philadelphia Record reported in a copyright today that New Jer- sey authorities planned to charge Mrs Anna Hauptmann as an aces sorry to the Lindberbh kidnaping after the fact if her husband Is convicted.
 The record quoted Anthony Nj. Hauck. Jr.. Hunuterdon County, ". J., prosecutor, a member of the prosecution staff, and George K. Large, special assistant attorney general.
 we now have evidence against Mrs Hauptmann. We are search ing for stronger points," the record quoted large as saying and, con- tinuing declared the state had two witnesses who would testify she x.f tnA som money.
 The record quoted Hauck as fol- lows:
 There is no doubt that Mrs Hauptmann will be arrested the minute her husband is convicted. Right now we merely watch and wait, but whence that time comes We will act and act quickly"
 Pennington, N. J., Jan 2S--CUP) --George K. Large. special assist ant attorney general in the Haupt- mann case, denied today that the state was contemplating any ac- ton against Mrs Anna Hauptmann.
 Thus far there has been no evidence to connect her with the case" Large said. "Only if, in yet IO COIHe, develops to show she had know ledge of 1t, will the state take any action"
 : Large pointed out that the fed- eral, state and city police officials completely absolved her.
 Federal Agents Doubt It.
 Remington, N. J., Jan 28-(UP) --Some of the federal agents who syent two years on the Lindbergb Kidnapping case believe Bruno Rich- ard Hauptmann did not commit the crime unaided, the United Press learned today.
 This group argue that when the crime was plotted the baby's death was not planned and preparations for taking care of the child during it's captivity had to be made. This theory would duplicate more than one person.
 It is argued that if Hauptmann had intended taking the baby to his own home, Mrs Hauptmann would have had Knowledge of the crime. Investigation has convinced detectives she knew nothing.
 Hauptmann is being prosecuted on he premise that he committed the crime alone and unaided. Most Of the detectives agree with this theory.
 Hauptmann on Stand ,
 Pennington, N. J., Jan 28.-UP) Bruno Richard Hauptmann re- sumed the witness stand to-day in his trial for the murder of Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr., to undergo a searching cross- ss-examination by At- torney General David T. Wiientz.
 Before the session began Justice Thomas W. Trenchard cautioned the crowded courtroom that "those who want to talk had better go outside"
 Deputy Sheriff Hovey Low stood directly behind Hauptmann's char as a guard. He is permitted to watch the prisoner by consent of opposing counsel.
 Hauptmann was pale. Hands clasped. he leaned forward to an swer the attorney-generaIs ques- tions.
 c. Mir Defendant, have you ever been up in an airplane? A. Yes, one time in Los Angeles.
 c. That was in 1891 on your trip to California? A. Yes.
 c. Did you hire 0 boat on that trip? A. can't remember.
 c. Don't you remember paying 75 cents for q ride on q boat-75 cents for you, 75 cents for Mrs Hauptmann; 75 cents for Hans Kloppenburg? A. 1 can't remem- Der.
 c. You wouldn't say that you didn't? A. Well can't remem- Der.
 c. You kept an account of your expenses on this trip? A. Yes l did.
 Q. From the day you started money in this country you kept accounts, didn't you? A. Yes.
 e. You kept an account every year of how much you and your wife were worth? A. Yes.
 c. If you had stocks and bonds you listed them? A. Yes. careful about figures and money you? A. I should say so.
 e. Did you put the figures in the book? Were they truthful figures. honest figures; were they correct? A. will gay the fig- uTeS were true put l ielt SoHle Oul'
 Q. Well, then they weren't cor rect? A. just didn't put every thing in.
 Q. But those figures in the book were correct? A. Yes.
 c. Now you don't want to change that testimony do you? A. No.
 Hauptmann said he could not give q yes or no answer, and the court allowed him to expand his answer.
 q saved money besides what put in the books" Hauptmann said.
 c. Oh, so you were hiding money from your wife? A. Well, No.
 Q. Oh, so you were hiding things from your wife, weren't you? A. No.
 c. When was the first time you met Mrs Henkel? A Summer of 1892.
 c. Was Henkel there when you met her? A. 1 think her sister was.
 Q. Don't you remember you mot her husba two weeks laterY