The Waterbury Democrat., 1935-01-23
Lest EUidence Is Most Spectacular
fQontlnuen frorn I,aee |,

rom Paee n
 $50 his wrists held firmly by guards.
 He was smiling and appeared rested. He nodded to several news papermen seated in back of him.
 Did you have a good rest" the
 Good rest" he replied. T feel fine"
 The storm apparently had no effect on the number of spectators. Expects AcquittaI.
 FIemington, N. l., Jan 23-CUP) When Bruno Richard Haupt- mann Is acquitted-and Bruno Richard Hauptmann has no doubt but what he will be acqultted-he wants the world to leave him alone so that he may live peacefully with his family.
 This was his word to the press last night through his counsel, Lloyd Fisher. Hauptmann indi- cated he did not expect to be found guilty either of murdering the Lindbergh baby or of extortion be- l cause of his possession of Lind- bergh ransom money. Fisher, when he went into Hauptmann's cell, took a list of questions submitted by reporters. The answers showed that Haupt- mann does not believe the state | has presented any strong evidence against him, that he has no fear of cross examination because he intends telling the truth, that while he feels he is too closely guarded, he holds no resentment against anyone, even against witnesses whom he says were mistaken In their testimony.
 Doubts Lindbergh New York, Jan 23.-(UP)-Be- cause tine human car Is without |equal in judging sound, the chances are 1000 to one that Col Charles A. Lindbergh was correct in his identification of the voice of Bruno Hauptmann as that of the man who received the Lindbergh baby ransom money.
 That was the conclusion of liar old +. Berlin, acoustical engineer, who addressed the New York Pro- ducer's Council to-day. eBrlln said that decades of research | proved that while some voices are similar each contains an indivi- | l,
 Two people," he said, "may call l to you with the same loudness or intensity but the ear never fails | to distinguish between them. You may not have heard the voice for | years and in that interval you may | have heard thousa nds of others, but the ear will always pick out the slight difference in quality | which distinguishes that particular voice."
 Start of Evidence |
 Remington, N. J., Jan 2S-(UP) Frank A. Kelly of the New Jer- sey state police was called to-day in the trial of Bruno Richard Hauptmann, to complete his cross+ examination by the defense.
 Edward J. Reilly of defense counsel questioned him.
 Kelly is the states fingerprint expert who testified he could find no print in the nursery or on the so called kidnap ladder.
 He returned, at Reilly's request to demonstrate the taking of fin gerprints.
 The defense attorney, when Kelly testified previously, had at tackled his credibility as finger print expert.
 Kelly took several pieces of ap- paratus from a black bag prepara- tory to carrying out his demonstra- tion.
 He stood at corner of the judges bench, dusting a piece of paper provided by the defense.
 Justice Trenchard left the bench and entered his chambers during the experiment.
 Kelly said one section of the finger ridges, but not distinctly enough to be of any value.
 Kelly finished his experiment and Reilly had the smudged piece of paper marked for Identifies ton.
 The paper was a yellow sheet of note paper-the same piece that Reilly passed around to defense counsel during Kelly's previous appearance on the stand. Kelly 1 that despite the fact that defense lawyers handled the paper, no distince finger prints were left.
 o. Now MT Kelly is it not Q fact the human hand is constantly throwing off a secretion? A. That is correct.
 Q. And Is it correct that no two have the same prints? A. It Is.
 0. Did you dust the window sill in the Lindbergh home on the Yes. night of the Kidnapping? A. Yes.
 Q. Now what will remove fin- gerprints? A. A towel rubbed over the surface.
 0. I understand you found no A. That's right.
 Q. What do you require for A. About five { points or ridges.
 Q. Isn't it fact that you can take a print with two ridges? Al No.
 Q. It has been testified here by Mrs Lindbergh and Betty Cow that hey attempted to close the nursery window? A. No.
 o. Did you find fingerprints on
 |