The Waterbury Democrat., 1935-01-18

best of my knowledge they were dictated.
 Q. As & result of dictation what did the defendant do? A. He wrote what was dictated.
 c. Later did you go to the Hau ptmann home and speak to Mrs Hauptmann? A. Yes.
 Q. Did you find wooden plane as a result of your search? A. Yes, in the garage. The plane was exhibited in court and offered in evidence. The de- fense objected. Justice Trenchard overruled the objection and the plane was admitted. 0. What else did you find? A. Two packages of gold certificates, one wrapped in a copy of the New York Daily News and the other in a copy of the New York Daily Mirror.
 o. How many bills did you find? A. 100 gold certificates in one package, 83 gold certificates in another.
 0. $10 certificates? A. Yes. o. What did you do about iden- tifying them? A. They were counted in the presence of Mrs Hauptmann and initialed by me- and rewrapped. WiIentz now began ripping open envelopes containing the ransom money, Wallace taking the money out to look at it. Wilentz opened one little envelope, took out the bills and had Wallace 1dentlfy them.
 Wallace identified the ransom money found in Hauptmann's gar age. It was taken out of bis' red cardboard envelope, heavy with seals.
 Wilentz offered the money in evidence.
 The defense objected on the grounds the state had not yet shown any connection between the money, the wrapplngs, and the de- fendant.
 Tt seems to me that there is definite connection shown, Justice Trenchard said, ''and so l VIII overrule the objection"
 Defense Counsel Pope then re, ceived permission for a general objection to the introduction Of ransom money as evidence.
 Wallace identified a photograph submitted by WilentZ as an inter- for view of the Hauptmann garage. It was admitted as evidence.
 The court asked to see the pie ture and Wallace stepped from the tsand to behind the judges char; He explained the various parts oI the structure to the judge, then stepped over to the jury to do the same thing.
 Q. What else did you find? A. We found a gallon shellac can under the work bench In the gar age. ,. ness. He identified it and 1t was offered in evidence and the oe- fense objected.
 MT Attorney General, are you going to connect this with the ran- som money" the court asked.
 Were going to show It was loaded with it," Wiientz replied.
 c. How much money was found? A. $11,930.
 c. What kind of money was 1t! A. It was Lindbergh ransom money.
 The defense again objected to the introduction of these bills. Some were $10 and some $20 gold certificates.
 Wilentz subsequently, said ne would offer all the packages in evi- dence at one time, but as separate exhibits.
 The defense agreed to this gen: eral offering. but placed it's usual objection.
 Although most of the packages contained $1,000 in bills, one was found to contain $93O. It was found that way, Wallace said.
 The can, Wallace said, was hid den under the workbench, and SUD- ported by nails so 1t could not be seen easily.
 c. How was 1t concealed? A. By a wide board nailed across the uprights.
 Q. Was anything else taken that day? A. No sir.
 Wallace then went back to the police station to talk to Haupt- mann about the money.
 c. What did Hauptmann say? A. He said the money was wet, that 1t had been in a shoe box in a broom closet until two weeks be- fore.
 c. Did you ask if he had any more money? A. Yes, he said no.
 c. Did you ask him if he had any more of Colonel Lindbergh's money? A. Yes.
 c. What did he say7 A. He said he did not.
 Q. who did you give the money