The Waterbury Democrat., 1935-02-05

- = . -------------------------@- any definite idea of when you left and didn't you say you didn't haveT | A. I don't remember saying that.
 | c. But today you have a defi- mite idea of the time you left? A. Ives.
 Reilly took her for brief redirect examoination.
 0. How far is 1t from the Hauptmann house to Loews s Sheridan Square theater? A. Quite a ways, guess.
 Joseph A. Tartell was the next witness. He was questioned by Frederick Pope of defense counsel.
 c. Where do you live? A. New York.
 o. Are you familiar with the Sheridan Square theater? A.. Yes.
 O. You know Mrs Ceclle Barr, who sells tickets there? A. Yes. | Q. What personal experience have you had with Mrs Barr in regard to change? Wilcntz objected. usttc l Trenchard sustained.
 Pope took an exception.
 Pope gave up and Tarteil was excused.
 l A live minute recess was order- ed.
 Mrs Louise Wollenburg was the next witness.
 c. (By Reilly)-How long have you known the Hauptmanns? A. Since three weeks after was married.
 c. You became friendly after you met them? A. Yes. c. Do you know Hans Klop- penburg? A. met Hans Kloppen- burg in 10S2. Q. Where? A. In HauptmanD's house.
 Q. TO you know Isidor Fisch? A. Yes do. c. IoH many times did you meet him? A. About 2 or times.
 .. Were you present at the home of this defendant in Decem- Der, 1883, for the farewell party for Fisch? A. Yes, l was.
 c. Who went to the party with you? A. My husband. | c. Who was there? A. II n 8 Kloppenburg. Mrs Muller, Mir Schlssler and a couple from New Jersey.
 c. How long did you stay? A. We slept there all night, my hus- band and I.
 Q. What time did Tisch leave A. Quite late in the morning. l WllentZ cross examined.
 c. You remember this house of Hauptmann? A. do. ! c. Who was Tn the parlor with you? A. I couldn't say. My hus- band was there. Q. When you said all these people were in the parlor when | Fisch arrived were you mistaken? ? A. Well, 1 was there.
 The witness was excused and her husband, Otto, called. c. Where did you meet Klop- penburg? A. At Hunters Island.
 Q. How long have you known Hauptmann? A. Five or six years. | O. Did you ever meet IsIdor Fisch? A. Yes, at Hauptmann's house.
 Q. Do you know Ernest schoef- fer? A. Yes sir, met him at the Hauptmann home. c. Do you remember Fiscb's farewell party at Hauptmann's house? A. Very well.
 He said at the party were Klop. penburg. Schissler, Isidor Fisch. MT and Mrs Hauptmann, Mrs Mul- Ter cn1 Ernest Schoeffler. c. What time did Fisch go home? A. Early in the morning. l WilentZ ross-examined.
 c. You got there abeut 10:30 and Fisch was already there? A Yes.
 Wollenberg was excused. Mrs Bertha Hoff took the stand l c. (By Reiliy)--Where did you live in 1882? A. In Bayside. Q. Did you ever live in the Yorkviile district? A. No.
 c. Did you spend some time on the farm of Q man named Budrow here in New Jersey? A. Yes. | c. You spent about four weeks there? A. Yes, Mrs Budrow in- vited me.
 c. Do you remember being vis- tied in Bayside by Budrow and another man sometime in 1033? A. Yes.
 c. About what month? A. Around Thanksgiving.
 q. Did you know the man who came with Budrow before that time? A. No.
 c. How long were these men in your apartment? A. About half an hour.
 c. show you q photograph and ask If you recognize 1t? A. Yes, I do.
 Q. Did Budrow give any name for this man? A. Yes. | n uyAnf Tatd,,r Fisch.
 Q. Did IsIdor FIsch have any bundles with him? A. Yes, ne did.
 c. Describe them?
 Wilentz objected, and Reilly told the court he would show Fisch had the suitcases that Fisch later left with Hauptmann.
 Tt has nothing to do with the ransom notes, nothing to do with the crime, nothing to do with Hauptmann," Wilentz said.
 Your honor" Reilly said, eff my witness comes from New York. am going to show that Isidor Fisch jumped over the cemetery wall and received the ransom money"
 ''I am going to brove," Reilly continued, that Isidor. Fisch con. ducted the negotiatolns with Con- don and that he tried to dispose Of the money when he sailed for Germany"
 "I have no objection to Mi Reilly trying to prove those things, Wilentz said. Whether he can 0i not is something else"
 Justice rrenchard excluded the question.
 Reilly withdrew the witness af. ter his ruling and caleid John P Seykora, a federal agent, wic worked on the Lindbergh case. Hs was shown c report of the case prepared In part by himself.
 c. Do you recognize this re. port? A. Yes.