Evening star., 1935-01-21

according to Hauptmann'S lawyers.
One of those she will accuse will
be the late ISidor FiSch, with whom
she was acquainted, the attorneys
said.
luested the court stenographer to read
he answer back to him. A pause en-
sued While he made a note of the
saying this may be OF
great importance to me-
That is exclusive of any cash loan,
made by the defendant" inquired
the attorney general.
Yes"
The State was apparently laying the
groundwork for testimony on the
$500 loan the Bronx alien said he
made to the late Isador FiSch, his
business partner, and who he said
left the ransom money in his care.
Frank said the total of Hauptmann's
stock purchases in 1929 was $1,l96;
1880 omitted; 1881, S2.836; 1882.
S49O525
In 1888 separate accounts were
Frank added. In the
Anna Schoeffel Mrs. Hauptmann's
maiden name) account that year, he
asserted the total purchases were
S256,44215.
This account, in Hauptmann'S Wife'S
name, was carried, he said, with
Steiner-RouSe g. Co.
Three accounts were carried, the
witness added, one by Hauptmam. one
in his Wife's maiden name and one
in her married name
@. Was there any other account that
year?
A. There was a small commodity
account. haven't any figures for the
total purchases in that.
G. How about stock accounts in
1884?
A There was one account with
S7,905, and another smaller one with
the purchase value of stocks
sold
Treasury Expert Tells of
Mrs. Hauptmann'S Accounts.
Wilentz then turned Frank over to
Reilly for cross ss-examination.
Reilly brought out from Frank that
he defendants wife had opened
bank account on October 27, 1924. in
the Central Savings Bank in New
York.
How much did she deposit?
A. 5000
The witness said her annual de-
0ositS in the next five years varied
between $1,000 and $4,000
The account closed in 1923, Frank
,aid.
Reilly asked the Treasury expert to
.otal the bank deposits Mrs. Haupt-
mann made in the five years before
The account was changed from her
maiden name, Anna Schoeffel, to a
oint account with her husband in
January, 1928.
"S5 ,37797." the witness replied.
@. Was $3.50 drawn out in October,
1927?
A. Yes.
When the account closed in jan
larry, 1923, there was slightly more
han S10O in it, the investigator said.
\ Joint account was opened in 1929,
With a deposit that year of S1,539.35;
n 1880. S1.4475O; 1881, s6l9.25, and
932, S3,146,52.
@. And in 1933-up until the ac-
:ount closed in March?
A. S2,71O.
Reilly directed Franks attention to
from the joint accounts
which ranged from 1887 to amounts
eSS than Sl00.
An $500 deposit shortly after the
1897 withdrawal, Frank said, was not
he return of that money, but OF
unds taken from Hauptmann'S brok-
rage accounts.
Follows
Testimony Given by Expert.
Hauptmann, with a financial state
nent sheet in his lap, followed
2eilly's involved questions with alert
ttention. The spectators, however,
we're frankly bored.
@. How much was deposited in the
oint account in all the years from
928 down until it was closed in 1888?
A. The total deposits were Sl2,-
1923. in that joint account.
A separate account was opened IN
he wife's maiden name about the
ime of the kidnapping in the Central
savings Bank, the witness said, re-
pondiug to a question from Reilly
Reilly elected testimony that in 1888,
vhen the Hauptmann joint bank &C
ount was transferred back to Mrs.
maiden name, the de-
,osits totaled S2,512.
He then pointed out to the wit
less that in the pre-kidnap years the
deposits were only about
700 below this figure.
THAT is correct" the agent agreed.
Reilly swung his attention to
bank account in Mount
7ernon, N. Y, which was opened
hree months after the kidnapping.
The big defense chief raised his
yoice when he asked if the account
lad not been opened with the large
um of $3.50"
with the sum of $3.50, yes"
otal deposits at the Mount Vernon
Institution were $1,837.75.
Did Banking
Business Before Kidnapping.
In August, 1884, Frank went on,
opened savings account
which ran through September, with
otal deposits of $3.50.
In the Bronx Borough Bank, he
Ldded, Hauptmann. carried a savings
lccount begun in 1926 and closed with
1882 in it in 1882.
@. So, then, Anna and Richard were
loing a banking business before and
Ifter the kidnapping?
A. Yes, sir
@. And their deposits ran $1,000,
2,100, $4,000 a year, both before and
lfter the kidnapping?
A, After the kidnaping the deposits