The Waterbury Democrat., 1935-01-29

||ItI"F
 twas t true when you wrote to Fitchss brother that you put up @t2.60O for your partnership7"
 eNO, # was S9,50O."
 Once in the middle of a dis cutgion Of thesc financial deals ' seemed Hauptmann and Wilents were about 10 get into a quarrel such as they had yesterday. Hauptmann leaned out of the wilness chair, shook his finger at Wllentz and said:
 @That'e where you're wrong? That's where you get me mixed upe
 Hauptmann returned to his chair 10 minutes before the end of the recess and conferred with Lloyd Fisher and Edward J. Rell- ly of defense counsel.
 Reilly leaned over to Haupt- mann and was heard 10 say "Now, Bruno, when you make your ans. wefs, make them loud and snapDy ---.Eop-No~No"
 "Ail right" said 'HauptmanD. Bruno was called to the stand. c. sfBy Wilcntz) What month were those fur profits?
 A. June or July.
 c. You could tell better if you looked at your book. It's more than one month isn't h7
 4. Yes.
 c. Did you get any profits in money
 4. No. 1t was in bookkeeping. c. Can you find in the book other fur profits?
 4. No. Fisch kept the books of the fur business.
 c. All these moneys you're talking about as profits were not set down in your book?
 4. No.
 c. And there is not single, solitary record of Fisch's putting z ln n dollar more than S2,000?
 4. No.
 cate of stock in ISidor FiSch's 4. They were in my name.
 c. Do you have the name of sny fur dealer you dealt with? 4. No.
 Hauptmann said he knew of Woodlnwn cemetery, but had no knowledge of St Raymond's.
 c. Did you work at plant near Woodlawn cemetery?
 A. Yes.
 c. How far away was 1t? A. About a mile.
 c. Did you pass Woodlawn cemetery on your way to work?7 A. Never.
 q. Didn't you work in Yonk- ers7 A. Yes.
 q. Didn't you pass the ceme. tery when you went to work? A. No, I didn't
 Hauptmann, q wooden pointer in hand, demonstrated on q wall map the route he Employed in going from his home to Yonkers. e. All the time you were go- Ing to Yonkers you passed within Blocks of WoodIawn cemetery? A. Oh, it's longer than that.
 e. How far from Hans Muel- ler'g home did Dr Condon live? A. cont know where Dr Condon .. Were you familiar with the A. Not particularly.
 c. But before 1932 you had never been on Decatur avenue {? l(Where Dr Condon lives). A.. c. Nor in St Raymonds ceme- tery? A. No.
 a Did you ever pass in front of Woodlawr cemetery? A. 1 say yes, it's not far from my home. Wilentz again introduced the closet board on which Dr Con- don'S name and address were writ len.
 Q. Can you now give the jury : any explanation of why the mum. Der and telephone numbe were On the board? A. gave my an. swer yesterday already.
 2. That's the best ono you have to offer? A. Yes
 C. Take q look nt tbcye Ieltors and tell me fl they arc letters you wrote to the F'lsch family in Ger many? Are they in your hand writing? A. Yes
 AS HauptmanD looked over the papers, there wasn't trernor in his hand.
 Q. You wouldn't want 10 read !ncm, would your A. Oh. no, mo- body would understand them.
 c. They arc your hand and handwriting? 4. They are.
 c. I notice throughout these let
 
 sonio Of tho words. What are they? A. Crayon marks.
 c. ThoBc marks with the colored pencil are yours? A. No.
 c. IB there anything else that Isn't yours on these letters? A.. Yos.
 c. Well, cross off whatever you didn't write? A. All right.
 C. You mailed this letter to the Fisch family in Germany? A. Yes. Wilentz offered it in evidence. Pope Of defense objected to the introduction of the letter in evil dence on the grounds 1t was not the. original letter mailed but copy made by Hauptm1nn.
 Wilentz said he hoped by the letters 10 attack tho credlbllity of the witness and to prove by them the untruthfulness of his stories about Fisch.
 Justice Trenchard admitted the letter in evidence and Pope took Sn exception.
 c. Here's another letter. win you look at it and sec If it is from your A. Yes.
 Hauptmsnn read the letter care fully through. while Wilcntz and heilIy conferred nt the defense table.
 By consent of counsel, m inter preter was called 10 translate the letter.
 He was Prof George M. Priest . of Princeton university. lie Anld he had read both Of the FiAch let feFS.
 q. When did you do this trans- lation? A. The night before last in Trsnton.
 The letter, translated, read in part;
 "A week ago I received the sad inf0rD1gtion of the death of your brother and my best friend
 IT nEde the acquaintance or IsIdoy ifi 1892. At the home Of friends.
 pIn the spring of 1883 under. took sg5 transaction for Isidor iB wbIch felt he must win. Which