The Coolidge examiner., 1933-02-17
Our Government
How 1t Operates
BY William Bruckart
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

LdOOT, lew OF JnOSe WHO were
most vociferous in support of the
proposal had any conception of
what the new department of the
government was to do. A review
of the debates of the time indicates
rather clearly that somebody want
ed to do something for labor, but
they did not know exactly what that
something should be.
SO l am prepared to say that it
was the administrative officers who
have filled the several posts from
secretary Of labor down the line Of
rank who have made the Depart
ment of Labor something of value.
Some of those observers who
watched proceedings when congress
enacted the law tell me that the
movement had every appearance Of
sop to organized labor, and if
their conclusion be true, it certain
ly can be said now that the legis-
lators builded much better than
they knew.
The law which those legislators
passed said the Department of La
Dor was to promote the interests of
labor, Of the working people Of the
country, that their working condi-
tons might be improved and that
their opportunities might be adj
vanced. While still entertain
some doubt concerning what con-
gress thought this would mean, it
has become quite evident that it is
possible for the great intangible
thing. called government, to act In
a very personal capacity when oc-
casions require. 1t has so acted
through the Department of Labor.
Here Is an Illustration:
In great textile mill Of New
| England. the workers clamored for
better conditions; they wanted
shorter working hours; they want
ed assurance that they would not
be dismissed without notice; they
wanted certain agreements with the
owners as to the rates of pay, and
they sought an agreement with their
employers TO reach these under
! standings through a committee of
their own numbers. The employers
turned a deaf ear to the proposals
and would not even discuss them.
A strike was the alternative which
the workers offered.
One might say that was a private
matter and that the government had
no right to mix into 1t. But the
CONSTITUTIONS preamble says that
the government is. among other
things. ''for the people," Surely,
here was an instance where some
thing could be done for the people,
for workers and employers alike.
The Department Of Labor did
mix into the controversy. It sent
several men to the scene. They lis
tened to the grievances Of the work
ers and TO the statements of the
employers. They suggested ways
out, one after another, until they
were able to get a committee from
the workers and a committee from
the owners TO sit In the same room.
Eventually, these secret discussions,
always with a conciliator from the
Department of Labor participating,
developed a compromise on which
each side had yielded certain con-
cessiOns.
The terms are not material here,
but suffice it to say there was no
strike in that mill and there prob
ably never will be one, for the rea.
son that each side learned some
thing about the fairness and the
rights of the other fellow.
That controversy was simple COM
pared with some that arise and with
which the department has to deal
in order to do what its officials re-
gard as their public duty that there
may be peace in commerce and in
dustry. 1t shows, nevertheless, how
the multiple eye of the government
is upon us all.
And in connection with this last
reference, one must recall that in
this same department there is what
has come to be known as the chill
dren's bureau. 1t goes beyond the
working man in its course of duty.
The welfare of children of all
classes come within it's surveillance.
and throughout the country one now
finds juvenile courts, orphanages
and other institutions having to do
with children who are receiving
constant advice from the bureau in
Washington, d. G. 1t watches in
dustry, too. that there may be no
undue dangers developed. that con-
ditiOns conducive to disease may
not be continued and that every aid
within the power of the national
government is extended to correct
them.
Another phase of the depart
ment's work gives it control of the
entry into the United States of for
eigners. Our immigration law is per-
haps the most stringent in the
world, because it is our policy to
conserve our racial standards. The
0TnpIfiDp DOto iG raooivipn No v,,ouo