The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1933-11-25
w II a =
= a -
WORLD
By Joseph Freeman.


IN samen serial which deals with the ISLANDERS against
revolutionary literature how the author Of article called
Literary 1nquion"
scrupuous first chapter in Voices Of October
example gave however by
Grover walens fOrgees He objects what he calls wonder
story about everything going fine and everybody gooy happy and
productive and proceeds tumble together phrases from my chapter
which he asserts claims that
will take the trouble to look into Voices Of October
instead into the sicaiOns of the Modern Monthly will that
did not everything fne that everybody go
misqiotes:
energy politics
alton of literature following the controversy Of 1924 has resulted
tremendous growth" So of Voices of October 1.-THE
waters of controversy the dictatorship proan literature have
%nesea new poems pays ana moves p"u ana e d OF Witch
another the life uhered in by the Revolution
This the passage which our Scribe points to as an example
falsyng literary
nquon points to it. however in form which he recompense
scribe he any
lines which follow Immediately after the passage cited above
following chapters" said this life, described by the
noves will be considered concree 1T MUST BE POINTED
g HoTT1 a THAT eoEdS N LIFE TG 4oo Where WHERE
consciously rutess directed by the organized
CONSIDERED IN THIS BOOK ONLY AS THEY AFFECTED
BY THE po AS D s book N e to press the first
operations of the Fve-Year Plan indicate that new
assumed turn in Soviet art and literature"
NOW why did literary jesuit Monthly omit this
Why particular did he omit the words in CAPs9
simple He could make out case only by fifyng
leg to stand on For what said in SO many words was that Voices
of october dealt with they
Revolution the New Economic Policy"
a partisan Economic Policy
in years his mathematical center"
that October published in 1890 That due
factors also true and said so specifically
that the book deals chiefly with the October Reouon ana e
also said that expect new turn in Soviet art and literature
result of the FveYear Pa but that turn NOT discussed
n
1 would not hesitad to
believe knowledge of and contacts with the Soviet literary scene
opinions the Soviet
spend of 1929 in Mexico was out
literature and therefore confined statements
words And our indignant Scribe in the Modern Monthly
took the to very
why complain statements
the Modern Monthly Who am to be spared when our
Scribe does not Ienn himself this indgnty
ov our Scribe did this shall explain tomorrow
like that while Voices October said nothing about RAPP
out of touch with the Soviet literary
e% well IN ON the other hand heard from various
to RAp sls''-'' '-'N ''''''
But perhaps the best picture got the literary
IL August 1881 Boris Pnak lived at house saw him lit
% "a ho no 9 aon not speak English did not learn IT, and
deal and with unusual
candor To these circumstances Improvement in knowledge
Of the Russian language and of Soviet literature
master of Ian
and image stories about Soviet life and Soviet literature
learned things about Soviet literary groups and personalities which
p1nyak was fellow traveller RApp
RAPps dissolution He also revealed those characteristics
of the ferow-traverer of RAPP.
quite the Monthlys datbe the pic
literature
Instead inpion fellow
Pnyak
showed documents which the Party reversed various of RAPPs
against him.
literary against which
certain writer's REGARDLESS OF
WHETHER WE'RE NOT. The Party
against literary which had its well
Eventually abolished that clique.
According noisy toypso of the Modern Monthly the Party
before
that in April 1881 heard opponents
against
Helping the Daily Worker through Michael Gold.
Socialist
competition Luttnger
to $1,000 the $4,000 Daily Worker Drve
r. HerkEner $0b0
Previous Total 440O2