Evening star., 1933-08-07

1880 1929 IS 1928 s, 49,, 1927 1928 1925 1921,
sss9 4oON 1854 1891 7o7
Philippine. T.na1 a s7s. ssas sss7 ss s5 1 S 7o5 1856 1855 1000
e.a7 1870 $500 s7 1894 3e.
2ae7o oss6 dsaSs 1872
Tropical re6nee, hum. U. S. re6neries work part time
The refined brought in during 1882 was sufficient to supply
equivalent the consumption OF p states and
resulted reduced MEETINGS United States dismissal OF employees
reduced wages and decreased purchases Of supplies
Tropical re6ne now seek perpetuae their duplication Of
United States re6nees by demanding Official shareor quota
in the United States market!
Naturally fair the domestic industry their
stockholders numbering thousands Would be
the public interest? Would with American policy Old ana
Philippines and Rico have been literally treated and
should producers of originally
be fair Cuba quota chocolate and silk
other manufactured articles would be fair to give Canada
"qoa" -four Holland cheese? what stimulus for
h unnecessary duplication of mainland facilities not why should
he sugar refining industry be subject such official treatment?
10 jusifc alton for Cuba to duplicate domestic re6neries
In 1920 pointed that Cuba did refine
gar 2Oo preference afforded protection
American theory failed when Cuba built refnees
Cuba knew full well tariff principle of providing higher duty on
manufactured article than the material imported
beans the free list but choco-
late pays 1910 duty duty but silk itself $50 duty
generally Cuban dupao of domestic rehnees well un-
derood had claim the United States market or households
Foreign generally safeguard their refining industry oT
duplication even in their colonies
This Canada England France Italy, Holland Sweden,
Australia and generally throughout the World en-
country the approved practice Such is the
practice Canada England Holland Japan and other countries
been the practice the United 1t has proven best
producers everywhere has the best safeguard for
rather than dependence tropical rehnes
Why we advertising these the Home Makers Of America
United States sugar fners capacity employ
labor Cuba refined the United States
daily about 25Ooooo homes Cleanliness purity and prices
daily topics prices high the households look to
the producers the Tropics look to We stand between
these large groups relationship to both Sugar
refining distribution to be efficient in all respects must be large
industry failure search the World for supplies
vital national defense Anything which lessons
our and The households
of the country feel the effect From contacts with
the sugar producers satisfied that they with
the twounddear system of producing sugar in the
sugar islands and refining the United States where it consumed
snould not be disrupted
cecsion at Washington will affect Homes Of the Nation
We are advertising the country
NAV Washington, under the
Recovery Program, has been asked by small minority
group producers of the Philippines Puerto Rico and Cuba to make
against the of people the United States
The AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING McCAHAN
COMPANY MoLAssEs COMPANY
Earl D. Babst Chairman. By Manuel Ronda, President
At Boston, Brooklyn, Baltimore At Philadelphia
New Orleans
ARBucK1E BROTHERS COMPANY NEW JERSEY
By Martin E. Goetzingr By Post President
At Brooklyn At Brooklyn, Yonkers N. Y;
Edgewater, N. ].
& HAWAIIAN SUGAR
REFINING CoRPoRATIoN Ltd PrNNsv1v.N1. CoupArv
by FRANK T. oumVan fr'de" By John A. Mccarthy President
San francisco At Philadelphia
sFRAsknrs SUGAR REFINING Rrvrnr src., Rrr,,r.,
COMPANY -.
Ralph S. Stubbs, President D., ' ~
Philadelphia 4.
SUGARS Inc.
Charles Godchaux, President oA' 0oon" A'Ni'"'"
~! o-1-~- o. CORPORATION
By Benjamin O. Sp-egue
HENDERSON SUGAR REFINERY President
William Henderson At Savannah
At New Orleans
WESTERN SUGAR REFINERY
IMPERIAL SUGAR COMPANY By Frank J. Belcter, Jr
By l. H. Kempner President President
Sugar Land Texas Francisco