The Waterbury Democrat., 1931-06-12

$887.78. Attorney Emil Hummel was granted foreclosure Judgment of $1,590.95 against William B. Brown.
 To-day's short calendar session was a lengthy one. Judgment was entered in accordance with stipu- lation in the foreclosure suit of John Bugailiskis against Kleofas Povilaitis. In the case of the Wa terbury Savings bank against Jacob Wilensky, decision was reserved on a motion for the acceptance of the receivers report, the receiver was allowed $50 and funds now on hand were ordered handed over to the Merchants Trust company.
 On the motion of Ernest Kenyon to be made party defendant in the case of Ray R. Roberts against the Kenyon Bearings and Auto Parts company, Inc, the court reserved decision and entered judgment in accordance with stipulation in the case of Mattia Locatelli, New York Branch, Inc, against Jacob Gartz- man. The court ordered a disclo- sure of defense in one week in the case of the Naugatuck Savings bank against Raymond W. Hunter and also granted permission for the fil- ing of an amended complaint.
 Judgment by stipuation was en- tered in the case of the Standard Collection Agency Inc against Baron J. Torkomian. A limitation of time in which to cite in other defendants was granted in the case of Mrs w. M. Goss and Frank Miller against Samuel Rozenweig.
 in the case of Henry Weyand against the Liberty Oil company a motion for foreclosure went over one week and judgment was entered against incorporating defendants. Headings were ordered filed in two weeks in the case of Walter Rubek against Peter Mukosey. Disclosure ot defense was ordered in the case of the Waterbury Savings bank against Margaret M. Howell. Judg- ment of foreclosure was allowed in the case of Belle Fucker against action was taken in the case of John Sloksnaitis against Fortunate Ardito, no defense being offered.
 Disclosure of defense was ordered in the case of Ida Miller against Mary Alishauskas. An answer in one week was directed in the suit of the Mattatuck Lumber company against Carl c. Mattson. In the case of Anton Hassinger against Alex Bacun, disclosure of defense was or dered in one week. A one-month's continuance in which to file papers was granted in the case of the city of Waterbury against Edward l.. Parker.
 Cases going over included: Car mela Napolitano Coppeto against Salvatore Cocchiola, motion for dis closure; Vincenzo Zarelli against Salvatore Cocchiola, motion for dis closure; Howard M. Hickox against Oscar LaCroix, motion for disclos- ure; Aurelie Jodoin against Edmund Jodoin, motion for hearing in dam ages; John Deliniks against Stanley Ignatavice. motion for foreclosure; !; A. J. Mcfarland against A. J. Tebbe and Sons, hearing on plea in abate- ment: Ella Shoprinsky against Frank Podzunas, motion for fore closure: Irene Collins against Mi- chael Ryan, motion to consolidate; {; Lang and Stanley against P. M. Quilter, motion for judgment; Cit- izens and Manufacturer National bank against Dennis Calvin, motion for foreclosure; Town of Wolcott against Korell Salenko, motion for foreclosure; Benjamine Gromet against Rose Silver, motion for judgment; City of Waterbury against Ovila Quintin, motion for or- der of notice; Walter Mickiewicz against Mark Nathan Sears, motion for disclosure of defense.