Brownsville herald. [volume] (Brownsville, Tex.) 1910-current, 1931-03-26


DIE5T7G. Nz-- 1s-Dn.e-e1re
q 0r-sE - r=zzz 70 z1zEZz C
E&z-Es CCZn-F -zxS zzs eT76ez-
y@-ELzE. Enzn . hsz--z Ezs hsa
5s51-e - 9 Ez-e< -Ex zSzessE-
ar the c1-lEE3n-srx rnE---- a de-
z-71 C sozs -z--1F Er1z=rs t-oz
Par zz6 san Juan Appearing
TIE c0zr Ez @ be general
orEr1nn trzt ire csezzts1nIS T.
c1sS- for Ezlzsf1nrs OF farm Isrds
= cu- : psE cent bs pEE MO p-se-
TIRE d AK Asssssx EzrreS- A.
.cGcEng 70 Judge z c C01ch
Ez-rss- stated that s1ch q meas
Us Eca1d o. oIE a MS Jurisdiction.
and bsckHd I'D MS statement Ef-l
Z rslsEz1 from tie attorney gen
erals o<4soe
N0 IL farm z16 could % los
ern . pE cent II Ta-1z-io1- b1-
property oErers could appear III the
tan aEsessEs Office before May Is
and re-z-sz& their property. Judge
Cczch SAD
EozsTe-. tins GU co1d nor sp-
ply 70 ard which IS noE ASSESSED
TOO loT. according % CoEch- BIT
the Tax assessor could Use this >
Ter Ger. -ur - future variations II
ncsc instances. Re said
Earns. upheld his argument rhz-
the lOz1czI EaT O. reducing taxes Is
reduction II tar rate Ehtch opinion
re las expressed since January IEf,
when ne took office
Why not gITe the tzxpzrer. this
year. z reduction II rate o. AZ Least
> per ceEL. and next year start OF
D. cutting Valuations where they
should e cu-7- Earnest said
1t : ny understanding that You
believe that the values placed On
farm lands II my Office are TOO
hlgh and ths- you thing they should
De = Per cent l0Her2- Earnest said
when he first addressed the court
You iii recall that il Tanuzr.
before the field deputies we're pU-
70 work. this Office made q sincere
etfc-r o Es- your opinior- as vel
as the o5-nio1s o. others. OF vaIua-
tons; however, only o1e commlS-
Eoner. Nr- Atwood expressed any
ideas concerning what the values
should be-" Earnest continued
Red1cti0n Likely
Ez-nEz then spoke O. = Letter
Ehlca II lad presented 70 the
court OF January z- Tor the
CO1TLS information TIE 1zSlS ID
FzlEz-I0lS -O- ASSESSMENTS Tor the
yez- 1881 COPIES were supplied %
al led depZ-LS u the lax ASSES
SOCs cElzEEenL
II lie -EI-6- 10 TIE court Earn
est szz-a- that le E4s sure wnen
ne -0-z- TG-1z-1o1S acre IL = So
s-A1rlzl TsC1cr-o1 u TIE Tax rae
1o- 1881 Ca1 5s Ez6e
he 1L-ls- stated E1zr z 1e-xlS--
G- z1z determined effort E3-Id -
Ezce = e1.z-L6 z-zfSS-en-E am
quoted from TIE Constitution or
Texas Llz- Tz1z-o- saz- Go
eG-zI z11 Uniform
IN rs rzz 5e.o-e t1s court VS.
terczE Re Ez-e6 thai IS there wzs
10 resPClze 70 MS lEfte-. ne Con-
sacred Ila- lie court vas entire
" S--SlE1 with ms procedure. zrd
that tn mating o. N1nczy. xh=n
q celegztlCz O. San Juan cE-t-
appeared before TIE court zzs
The frs TINE IEzr re EEs rezsu-
70 Df-EFz that the tax aSseSz1rS
bass O. valuations EzS unsar.sfzc-
to<T 10 -e court
ADS- EE1 pointed cut that
nGe than 50 pS- csn- Q. the EOz
o. assessing has been performed
znc that zore than $500 hzs 5ez1
expended Il also pointed Out that
II people over the county would r0T-
loE rs suggestion made o. Jur-e
Co1A % the eftec- that Indlrcl-s
could s1Dez- and chance their nm
relc1-oE that might I'M I'd 10 g.
oc p-uD=TT oEreE Ea Snuxea
rh7 court that III hR increased hH
force ri Cle-ks 70 &C. re could To-
hcpe 20 Eaz= rlsz CHANCES II tire
70 comply with the EzE- Re aIso
pointed O.. that s5ou. 1900 rou-
resident property oE-srs hare aI=o
maze their rErr1r--E
AD REDUCTION q FOFN
We cant ignore their -z-.s
We Void u forced - make or
ne~ rS11go1S and 7zt- r1@- p
1SS loz-rsE-cs-- tzx7zTE-x z-d
e C11lE r1r h1-s % hare -1=-
S.E-Hd ard returned - tine ~
comply nth TIE IzT. EzrreS+
said