Askov American. [volume] (Askov, Pine County, Minn.) 1914-current, 1931-05-07
Approved April 20, 1881.
CHAPTER 237-S. F. No. 1870.
4 a L. 4 l.

SHAI L E<As ~OS .. 4. NJ. IlSVs
AN ACT TO Iegalize foreclosure sales
heretofore made.
Be it enacted by the Legislature OF
the State of Minnesota:
Section 1. Mortgage foreclosures
legalized. Every mortgage foreclos
ure sale by advertisement heretofore
made in this State, under power oil
sale in the usual form contained in
any mortgage duly executed and re.
corded in the office of the Register
of Deeds or registered with the Reg.
istrar of titles of the proper county
of this State. together with a record
of such foreclosure sale, is hereby
legalized and made valid and effec'
tive to all intents and purposes. as
against either or all of the following
objections, viz:
1. That the power of attorney t.
foreclose the mortgage provided fol
by Section 1906, General Statues 1928
did not refer to the book and page
of record thereof in the office of the
Register of Deeds where the same is
of record. or otherwise definitely de.
scribe and identify the mortgage
authorized to be foreclosed.
2. That the power of attorney tt
foreclose the mortgage was witness
ed. and the acknowledgment of the
execution of the same by the mort
gage or by the officers of the mort
gage, if corporation, was taker
by the person. to whom such power
was granted.
3. That the power of attorney tc
foreclose said mortgage provided fol
by Section 1906. General Statutes 1923
had not been executed and recorded
prior to such foreclosure sale as pro-
vided by law, or had been executed
prior to such foreclosure sale, but moi
recorded until after such sale, pro-
vided such power of attorney is exc
cuted and recorded in the proper
office prior to the passage of thi.
act.
4. That the power of attorney tc
foreclose the mortgage provided fol
by Mason's Minnesota Statutes OF
1927, Section 1905, was executed b,
the mortgage or assignee before
there was default and the power Of
sale therein contained had become
operative.
5. That the notice of sale was pub.
lished six times but not for six weeks
prior to the date of sale or that the
sale hereunder was held before one
week had elapsed after the last anC
sixth publication had been made.
6. That the notice of sale as pub
lished properly described the prop.
erty to be sold in one or more oil
the publications thereof but failed tc
do so in the other publications there.
OF, the correct description having
been contained in the copy of sale
notice served on the occupant of saiC
premises.
Z. That the notice was published
for six full weeks and the mortgage
sale was postponed and the origina
notice, together with notice OF post.
ponement. was regularly published ir
one issue of the same newspaper
Immediately succeeding the last pub
LEGATION of the original notice, but
no notice was published in the issue
of the said newspaper intervening
between the first publication of saiG
postponement and the postponed date
of sale.
8. That the notice of mortgage
foreclosure sale correctly stated the
day of the month and hour and place
of sale but named a day of the week
which did not fall on the date given
for such sale.
9. That the notice of sale correctly
described the real estate but omitted
the county and state in which said
real estate is located.
10. That the notice of sale did no;
state the amount due or failed to
state the full and correct amount due
or claimed to be due.
II. That the notice of sale de-
scribed the municipality in which the
sale was to take place as a city in
stead of village; or village instead
of city.
~. That the notice Of sale did no,
give the date of such notice.
Is. That notice upon the cccupan.
of the mortgased premises was actu-