The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1930-10-09

and Professor Sadyrin, who were en-
gagged in the agricultural coopera-
tive movement, were working above
all for a capitalist development Of
our economic system and in par
ticularly of agriculture. The develop
ment and strengthening of the Ku-
laks was intended to play the deci-
sive role for the success of their
aims and the complete restoration
of agricultural and industrial private
property.
"In addition to the Kondratyev
group there was the group of intel
lectuals, Gromann, Basarov, Su-
chanov, ETC., who leaned towards
menshevism. This group of the cleft
est" of ''left wing" menshevists,
many of whom are themselves not
formally members of the menshevist
organization as a result of their
1eftness" set as its aim the demo-
cratization of the Soviet power and
were compelled to support them
selves on the Kulaks. The carrying
out of the liquidation of the Kulaks
as class by the Soviet power flung
the acknowledgment group, which
did not believe in the possibility of
building up socialism in the Soviet
Union, into the arms of the Kondrat-
yev group. The close contact of these
two groups, of course on the basis
of the Kulak platform, was crowned
by their connection with the sabot-
ayers organization led by Palchin-
ski which was liquidated last year.
The aim of the Observation-Disclosures
groups was to set up a bourgeois
government in the place of the So
Wet power. Their work in the econ
omic and state organs of the Soviet
power was directed always towards
strengthening the capitalist ele-
ments, particularly the Kulaks upon
whom they chiefly based their hopes.
"The two groups had no connec-
lions with the working class, the
poor and middle peasantry and the
intellectuals of the Soviet Union.
Amongst these masses who work
Loyalty with the Soviet power and
desire to build up socialism, these
groups represent a little company
of outsiders. They were unable to
establish any connections beyond
those with the professional experts
engaged in the Soviet apparatus land
particularly in the agricultural or
gans and the agricultural coopera-
tives), are czarist officials and the
Kulaks. In their work, however,
they sought connections, sometimes
with success, with the right wing
elements in the Communist Party of
the Soviet Union, as they regarded
these elements, not without reason,
as forces making for a capitalist
restoration. Is there any clearer
proof necessary than this in support
of the decision of the XVI Congress
of the G. P. of the Soviet Union
which declared the right wing ele-
ments as the agents of the Kulaks
in the c. P. and their opinions as
irreconcilable with membership of
the Party? Kondratyev and his
group on the one hand and the
Suchanov group on the other were
the principal originators of all the
theories of the right wing oppor-
tunists against the general policy of
the Party. The counter-revolution-
airy nature of these two groups
shows clearly in what direction the
theories borrowed by the right wing
ers from Kondratyev and Suchanov
lead.
"The NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. groups
which reckoned with the victory of
the right wingers in the C. P. of the
Soviet Union which they considered
would be the natural first stage on
the way to a capitalist restoration,
also used the Trotskyists for their
counter-revolutionary aims. The