The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1930-12-11

Estimated distribution OF the moneys in
the period from the end of 1923 till the
spring OF 1880: Oil industry, through Larit-
chez. approximately 100000 reubles: coal
mining through Iaritchey. about 10000
roubies; peat cutting. through Laritcllev
about $4,000 roubles: forestry. through Larit-
chey, about $4,000 roubles; metal industry
Through Hartmann and CharnovSky, about
100000 roubles; textile industry, through Eye
dotoV and Kupriyanov. about 100000 reubleS
miscellaneous through Kalinnikey, about
100000 roubles; transport, through Larit-
cheK, about 100000 roubles; power supply
through VaSchkoy and Kamenetzky. about
100000 roubles: economic group. through La
rltchey and KaAnnikoy, about $4,000 roubles
total: 100000 roubleS."
Ramzin and Laritchev at once informed
their accomplces in Moscow as to the gen
eral political adjustment, and also with re-
gard to the methods of future work and the
remittance of money
RANKIN, in his statement of October is
1880. gives a detailed description of thi.
meeting in Paris, the date of which he give
as between October and 10, 1923, He give
the same names-Denisoy. Nobel, Gusakoy
NecherSky, Starinkevitch, and Ryabuchin
sky, adding that of Konovaloy, and his state
ment shows that TIE conference was NOR
definite in character than indicated in hi
| first statements.
| With respect to the intervention question
2am2in declares:
At this session Denisov informed u
\ that the whole of the work for the interven
ton must be divided into two parts: pre-
parations abroad and preparations In tn
Soviet Union. The first part of the work
that is, the diplomatic negotiations will
the governments, the 0aancing of the inter
Nention and the organization of its militar.
forces, was taken over by the Trade art
IndusI~ial Committee, whi.-. - was the dut,
4 of the Industrial Party to devote itself t.
| the inner preparation for the intervention
in the country itself. by means of bringing
about and aggravating economic crises, ant
aiding the Intervention from within. TIL
! Trade and Industrial Committee had alread,
secured the support of France and England
\ in this question. France was taking over tn
chief leadership Of the Intervention and cal
| culated on the military forces of Poland
land would aid the Intervention with it
/ fleet The most favorable moment for tn
4 Intervention was still considered to be tn
summer of 1890 Laritchev and wer
agreed on thiS). and 1881 as the very lates
/ term. Therefore, the whole of the work o
the engineering centre was to be concen
trated on the fun development of the crisi
in 1880"
4 Strictly speaking this was therefore con
ference on the time and means to be chosel
for the military intervention in the Soyie
1 Union. The conference was continued in tn
. evening, at the unofficial meeting alread
mentioned as having taken place in res
1 taurant in one of the boulevards.
| Ramzin's statement continues:
! G.. At the subsequent meeting tattendet
| by Laritchev and MYSELF in the evening o
1 the same day. in the private room of q res
| taurant in the district. of the great boule
i wards there were present Denisoy. Nobel
| Gukasov, Metchersky, Tretyakov and Kasch
tanoy. I conversed chiefly with Denisov
| Denisoy said that they we're quite convinced
| of the success of the intervention for thi
time it was an Intervention with a solid folin
dation, both from the military side and from
the side of supplies and former errors woulc
| not be repeated. I remember that Tretyakoz
observed that if use were made of the troop:
of Poland. Runania. the Baltic states. and the
Wrangel army-numbering about 100000 mer
the Intervention would have a magnifi-
Gently equipped army at its disposal that in
the opinion of many former industrialists
given support from the sea side in the North
and the South success could be ensured with
even a small army of 100000 to s009 900 men