The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1930-12-11

susne centralized character. uniform for
every branch of industry. until October 1923.
Iaritclaev, for instance, makes the follow
inc statement with regard to the preliminary
individual connections t16th october, 1890:
:" At the end of 1927 during the stay
in Paris of one OF the active members OF
the Centre Of the Engineers and Techni-
clans. Professor Ramzin, later president OF
the Central Committee of the Industrial
Party. received definite instructions from tho
Trade and Industrial Committee and from
the French general staff. on the necessity
of forcing the measures being carried on by
the sabotage organizations IN preparation OF
the Intervention. as also a general plan for
carrying out the intervention, with state
ment of the possible time for its realization.
the first term being set originally for 1928.
At the same time Professor Ramzin got into
touch with in Moscow. for the negotia-
tons and the maintenance OF the connec-
tons with foreign circles"
Among the connections of this nature we
must include the meeting between RSnszin
| and Laritchev in London, few days before
| the session in Paris, at the house of the
engineer A. A. Simon director of Vickers
works., at which certain Mr.. Philip imam
| ager at Vickers works. was present, and the
meeting Laritchev and Ramzin had with the
English colonel Lawrence:
| %. Engineer A. A. Simon and Sir Philip
| informed us that at the moment France rep
resented the centre of the intervention
preparations. and had the intention of oper-
ating with the military forces of Poland.
Rumania. and the Baltic states; that Eng
land was joining with France in these prep
arationS by helping with money equipment,
ETC.. that England had also the intention of
| lending military assistance of the interyen.
ton with its fleet; that Churchill was the
chief promoter of the Intervention; that
England was particularly interested in the
Russian oil affairs and would like to inters
vene with its fleet in the Black Sea-" (State-
ment made 10th of October)
Sc. . During our stay in London, that is.
I in September, 1923. Ramzin organized Q
meeting with the we'll known Colonel Law
4 renee at the Savoy Hotel I was present at
this meeting The general attitude of Eng
i liSh military circles toward the Intervention
i was discussed Colonel Lawrence supported
4 the idea in every way, and assured us that
i English military circles too maintained q
/ positive attitude towards a general particle
patton in an intervention against the Soviet
i Union, and that they were working out
4 definite measures; besides this, serious steps
4 were being taken to paralyze the propaganda
4 and influence of the Soviet Union in the
A East and in China. He did not give us any
4 details regarding this work"
i At the above mentioned conference In
Paris in October, 1928 balance was drawn
| of the work of the individual connections as
maintained up to that time by the members
of the central committee of the Industrial
4 Party in its own sphere with the leaders of
i the Trade and Industrial Committee and
/ with the army stats of France and England.
i and a united Central was created for the
i future
! AT the same time, October, 1923 was the
time when the Trade and Industrial COM
4 inittse came finally to the conviction that
/ the intervention must be forced within the
/ shortest possible time. The following state
1 ments, made by Kalinnikov. are extremely
/ important in this regard:
According to Kalinikoy's statements:
g. Chrennikov and Fyedotov, returning
/ from their journey abroad in 1927, brought
the Engineering Centre the news that the
| government crisis in France and England
had caused the acceleration of the interyen.
ton to be considered necessary; as to the
Russian White Guard circles in France, these
were apparently not yet convinced of the
4 necessity of Fastening the intervention, since
! the Russian emigres in the Trade and In.
ausrtial Committee were not yet willing to