New Britain herald., 1930-02-18
TRACESK| BITTER
 ANSWERING MAYOR
Continued From First Pase)

Continued From First Pase) lis information he would not make any such statement
 Not Indebted to City
 As a matter of fact, the records of the court clerks office show that I do not owe the city court of the city of New Britain one penny and have not owed the court one penny since March llth. 1922 less than q month after I was appointed a judge of the city court. The records fur thcr show that while practicing at torncy Of said court, all Of my bills were paid promptly.
 The records Of the court clerk s office further show that Judge SaX@ individually. does not and has not owed the city court of the city Of New Britain one penny since he was appointed a. judge of the court. and further shows that the partnership account of Hungcrford X SaNc ,haS been paid up promptly each month.
 ''I do not desire to enter into any controversy with the mayor on the matter. but feel that the public is entitled to the facts and I intend to stand hv the facts.
 STANLEY l. TEACESKI,"
 DanhcrG COntradiCts raonCssa
 Denying the accuracy of I state ment published by Mayor Paoncssa yesterday, Clerk Emil J. Danbcrg Of the city and police courts this afternoon declared he had never told the mayor that the accounts or judges have been so far in arrears as 10 interfere with collection Of amounts due from other attorneys.
 The mayors statement was in tha form of denial that he had clailu- ed credit for cleaning up the over due accounts of lawyers. He ap- pended q paragraph relating con- vcrSation with Clerk Dunbcrc in which. the mayor reported. the court clerk told him it was difficult 10 de- mand of the practicing attorneys more than was being asked of the judges, and that the judges accounts were so far in arrears as to present an obstacle.
 Attorney Danbcrg'y statement reads;
 "Ncw Britain Herald,
 "City.
 Tn your issue of February 11tr. there appeared an article relating to accounts owed by attorneys 10 the city court of New Britain. including q statement by Mayor Paoncssa. the last paragraph Of which statement read as follows:
 In justice 10 the practicinc at- torncNs 1t might be said that Clerk Danbcrg has informed me the chief obstacle in the way of clearing up these accounts is the fact that the judges themselves have been so far in arrears and it has been difficult to demand ot the lawyers more than was being cAactcd from the judges.
 ''ln my casual talk with the mayor I made no statement such as is in cludcd in this paragraph.
 Upon examination of the ac- counts Of the city court relating to attorneys. I find that Judge Stanley J. Traccski paid up the balance due on his account on March 1lth. 1929, shortly after his appointment to the judgeship. Since that time, he has never at any time been indebted to the city court for attorneys fees.
 "Therc also appears an account in the court records in the name oG HunGcrford & SaXe. and this account has been running since the forma. tion of the partnership Of Hunger ford X SaNe, and this account has been paid. with few exceptions. every month. There has been no account in the name Of Judge Nor rls D. SaNc since February IS. 1924.
 EMIL J. DANBERG."