The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1930-12-01

ognized character of Rabushinsky as
the chief protagonist of war.
Ramsin went on to describe ex-
hauStiVely the meeting with the in
dustrial and commercial committee
in October, 1913, as a representative
of the central committee of the "in-
dustrial party" with the object of
obtaining precise explanation and
proof of the concrete intentions of
this committee and the French gov
eminent regarding the carrying out
of intervention.
At Ramsin's express request for
tangible" proofs and real relations
with industrial and commercial COM
mittee with the French general staff,
DenisSov, Russian capitalist under
the Czarist regime, promised to in
troduce him personally to the Off
GERS of the general staff.
The introduction took place the
following day with the French Colo
nels Joinville and Richard. This
proof sufficed to convince Professor
Ramsin and Larichev of the serious
preparations for intervention through
the French general staff, with the
express support of Poincare and
BRAND
Further proof of the information
the establishment of a special COM
mission on military questions regard
ing Intervention in Russia under the
presidency of General Janin was also
brought out. Here Krylenko de-
manded the reading of extracts from
the Siberian diary of General Janin
at the time Of his presence in COM
nand of the reactionary troops I'M
der Kolchak as representative of the
French government. The extracts
showed that General Janin has al
ready had great experience in inter-
ventbn and war on Soviet territory.
They also showed the appalling bru-
talities committed by the white in
tervention group.
Regarding the financing of the in
tervention, Ramsin stated that Den
issov expressly named the French
war ministry as one of the providers
of money.
Following their declarations re-
garding conversations with the in
dustrial and commercial committee,
Krylenko demanded a statement from
the defendants on their attitude to-
wards the committees statement of
Nov. 80. In this statement, the in
dustrial and commercial committee
declared, under the signatures OF
Denissov, Nobel, Konovoloff, Leoni-
zoff, ETC., that they never had rela-
tons with the accused, never gave
finances to the industrial party and
that their statements were inventions
of the G. P. u, or were extracted by
torture. Concluding, the declaration
of the industrial and commercial
committee stated they would carry on
an untiring struggle for the restora-
ton of freedom" in Russia.
The reading of this statement was
received by the audience and the ac-
cused with equal indignation. Pro-
fessor Ramsin declared in tones of
deep conviction that the industrial
and commercial committees declara-
ton was mass of shameless lies.
The statements regarding the extrac-
ton of confessions by torture, said
Professor Ramsin, is particularly des-
picable. The presence of the accused
and their healty condition, obvious
to all present, said Professor Ram
sin, is sufficient reputation of this
lie. Professor Fyedotov and Otchink
confirmed emphatically the emil
nently hygienic conditions Of the
prison and declared that they we're
healthier recently than before.
Individually the accused confirmed
their knowledge of the contents of the
conversations Of october, 1928, re-