New Britain herald., 1929-02-20
BROTHERS KEEPER BEATS UP WOMAN
Objects to His Liying at Home
 Of Deserted Wife

Wa,enty BosurzeNski. 36, of |'rreasure Field, kepsington. learned in police court today that he is not his brothers keeper. although he had been lahorins under the impress sion that it Was his duty to keep an eye on him. Last Saturday after noon. Walenty and his wife went to the home of Mrs. Rose Stolarski at 17 I.awlor street. where Walenty's brother has been boarding for the past few years. their purpose in making the visit being to persuade the boardcr to leave.
 They had talked about the broth- CTS persistence in living with Mrs. Stolarski. whose husband is in parts unknown. and had agreed that he was disgra cling the entire family. as he has 2 wife and children in Tren- ton. N. II. and should live with them OF at least support them. They waited a while for the brother to come home from work, and in the meantime they bought liquor from Mrs. stolarski. paying her $t for q pint. according to their testimony. which was denied by Mrs. Stolarski. At any rate. Mrs. Stolarski de- manded money from the brother and he gave her SIS. Walenty spoke up and berated his brother for living with the woman and an ar gument ensued. According to Mrs. Stolarski. Walenty beat her so that 1 her body was mass of black and blue bruises. One Of her eyes was blackened and her hand was burned by contact with the stove. She was beaten and kicked by Walenty. who also smashed a door in his frenzy. she said.
 Walenty and his wife gave an en- tirely different version of the fracas, however. admitting only that they had made the visit in the hope of separating the brother from Mrs. StolarslSi. It was the brother who assaulted her. they claimed. Walentv denying that he had raised his hand to her. In fact, Mrs. Stolarski hit him on the head with q frying pan. he said.
 Attorney B. J. Monkiewicz. repre- senting Walenty, said the state should have brought the brother to court as a material witness, and Prosecuting Attorney Woods replied that he did not need any advice as to how the states case should be conducted. He scored Walenty and his wife for making it their business to pry into the affairs of others and accused them of being trespassers. Attorney Monkiewicz contended that 1 Walenty was we'll within his rights in making the call. having at heart his brothers welfare. He discount ad Mrs. Stolarski's testimony. point ing out that she denied selling liquor although Walenty and his wife, be- sides a witness living at 54 Union street, testified to buying it from her. He doubted that the court would pay any attention to the tes- tinony of woman who has a hus- band yet lives with a man who has a wife and does not live with her or support her.
 Judge Traceski brought out through questioning Walcnty that the brother is about 39 years of age and he warned Walenty and his wifi. to stay away from Mrs. Stoiarski's home. He imposed a fine of SIG without costs on Walenty on the charge of assaultinf Mrs. Stolarski and remarked that if improper re. lations actually existed between the boarder and Mrs. Stolarski the au. thorities will take whatever action is necessary. Violates Probation
 Joseph Boskoski. 3S, of 10 Yale street, was arrested early today by Sergeant McAvay and Supernum- erary Officer Edward Muszynski or the charge of violation of probation He was ordered to post q bond oi $500 to pay $lO week towards the = =. =, - =