The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1929-10-26
The Face of German Social FasCism

(which nominaly only temporary oulive their m
exercised by organizations formally unonneced with state
fascsm finds its support oademocracy las
to be expected from the structure of the country
theology to cling to- state will be
this After the rejection of the law for the republic
he declared that the prepared the
clause 4 the Reich constitution
protested against the of the clause bridge
legal gap The actions of the Coalition Government very greatly
acceerang development required deoogy There also
good deal of for the of extaega force in the
difficulties of the German bougeoisie head
feature las is to be expected considering special
Junction. the tendency to make sociasc organizations
terrorist acts part of the mechanism of the state At the
struggles discussed question establishing connections be-
tween that organization and the Reichsweh schupoze
this NAV he an evaporation in actual fact hut - ~ az @
designed facilitate deologc preparation
sOciaaest terrorist groups for the coming class struggles
We-as any avOwed fascist might have referred the
reformms claim to exercise the fascist dictatorship Germany
Actually reliance mass organizations outside the state
the bugeses standpoint advantage traditional forms
of military dictatorship theological and organzaon unity and the
essential organization as pillar
dictatorship greatest practical advance of German social
probably the of the trade unions
and other organizations controlled the refomst along this
road 1t is impossible the
offensive directed splitting all these bodies dealing
mainly with the deoogy of German fasm must be content with
pointing out that the responsible splits
have undergone change the last two Previously Com
unions by their IDEAS neutrality
nominay unpotcal mass organizatons neutrality has dis
bodies with the trade party proclaimed
unsts excluded because they introduce politics. but because
they definite ansocial democratic policy and fight
the trade union party"
At Hamburg Tarnov pointed that the program
democracy would necessarily bind the closely
before to the party working that the state Objcey
these ties nothing but their admission indicates
in the development of these organizations fascsm
because the minds of the members part which,
cordng We these bodies will play the coming dictatorship The
Rechsbanner bore ypcay fascist foundation
but the May Days for the first time for witnessed the
unions acting exponents finally
tenders the white used against the working hey
titled the prohibition of the demonstration necessary protect
must be protected from minority of durbers Of the peace This
fact both implicitly and explicitly arms the socialasc character
Of their actions.
The political objection socialascs armng the chief
the coming mperals In this sphere Magdburg showed
the development of So much has been said and
written about the of defense that little
further Nor after what has been said above need
explain the necessity rom the standpoint Of the special functions of
sociaascm of coupling pac phrases with the mpeast reality
and why this in preudces the fascist character of the
Its fascist character u.s. the contrary intensified by the
concessions made Immediately before the Congress- to the critics
within the party The original statement the necessity for
land therefore of the coming stated that view Of the
fascist and mperat powers threatening the German republic with
counerevouonay intervention and according Her
Mues thesis submitted the Congress there such thing