New Britain herald., 1929-10-17
SUSPECTED YEGGMEN
 GET COURT HEARING
Continued From First Page)

 light on it and called his attention to it. Officers kranzit and McCar thy searched all the vacant rooms in the hotel but found nothing.
 Officer Kranzit. in reply to Prose- -cuting Attorney Woods. said he ob- served that the dials on the safe had been knocked off and there was a hammer and other tools on the floor, A white store coat was nearby, Followed Footprints
 Officer kranzit noticed a foot print On the dough mixer in the bakery division Of the store and one on the window sill on the west side. Under cross examination by Judge Mangan. the officer said he did not measure the foot prints. and the flour outsid" the room Of the hotel was in small bits, probably twice the size of the head of a pin.
 e Cross examined by Attorney Me Donough, Officer Kranzit said Cits- zynski and panelcZyk were dressing when he saw them, other policemen having gone into the room first. The bed appeared to have been occupied he said. He was not present when the young men were questioned.
 Officer Thomas C. Dolan, finger print expert and photographer tes- tified that he engineered the job Of taking pictures of the safe, the bar Iels, the bakery, the broken lock and bar which were knocked off. the broken window through which the bakery was reached, and the window leading from the roof of the Union S,ore into the Hotel Erwin.
 Although the Mohican Market and the Union Store are not in the same building. it is possible to go from the market to the hotel across the Union Store roof, Officer Doian Said. He observed grease bench In the bakery but saw no foot prints or the bench, he said under cross examination.
 No Fingerprint Evidence In reply to Judge ManGan. Officer Dolan said he looked for finger prints but found none. Asked if he took the finger prints Of the young men after their arrest, he replied negatively.
 Officer Mccarthy testified that a man called him on East Main street and told him a policeman wanted him in the rear of the market. He went there and found Officer kran- git, who told him Of what he had heard. While Officer kranzit went to Headquarters, Officer Mccarthy climbed a ladder to the roof of the z1narket. He saw a footprint on the window sill, another on pile of flour bags and another on the dough mixer.
 The mark of a hand was also ap- parent on the flour bags, he said.
 Accompanied by Manager Sullivan Of the Mohican Market. Officer Me Carthy examined the safe and searched the store to see if anyone was hiding Nobody was in the store. In the Hotel Erwin, a grour of Massachusetts men in room were questioned but satisfied the po- lice that they were not implicated 1T rhe break, so the police went to the room where Cieszynski and Pawcl- czyk were. Officer Mccarthy did not .hear much of the conversation Act ing Sergeant Cabelus had with them but he recalled that they said they 1lad come 10 the room after being to a theater.
 Judge Mangan cross examined Officer Mccarthy as 10 the presence of marks on the floor of the hotel corridor and the officer said they looked like grease stains but they might have been oil marks or some thing else. Cross examined by At 1orney McDonough, Officer Nc Carthy said no policeman examined the Massachusetts mems automobile 50 far as he knew.
 Acting Sergeant Testifies
 Acting Sergeant Cabelus testified that he took part in the investiga. .tion with Officers Mccarthy Kran. git, Zajkowski O'Keefe, Politis Wagner and Johnson. 4 son of the owner of the Hotel Erwin openeG the doors of all the vacant rooms fol the police 10 search.
 Noticing a light through q tran. som in another room the acting ser geant trapped and was admitted, find ing CieszynsN and PaWelczyk in bed The floor had a substance on it tha looked like flour and there was som' in the corridor. Cieszynski told th' acting sergeant he was employed 1T the hardening room of the Skinne Chuck Co., and the susbtanCe O. the floor came from there. Cieszyn ski and Pawelczyk were taken 10 tn police station and booked on suspl cion.
 On cross examination tn" actIni sergeant admitted that he could no Say what the substance on the foo was. but il looked like flour.
 Asked by Judge Margan if it va possible that the substance had bceI tracked by the acting sergeant him self the witness replied negatively saying he noticed the substance be tore he reached the door.
 Grapce A, Evidence
 A bag of grapes. which the wit ness found in inc room vas offerc in evidence and the witness said on Of the young IE"n claimed 10 hav bought them ia store on Mai street, but did not know Or woul not tell what store j.. was. The bal according to Acting Sergeant ca belus, vas identical with bags use in the Mohican market.
 Judge TraccslI asked the actin sergeant about the young men clothes, and the witness said hc ii not examine them.
 Well. if they had been in bak, rhop they would have som" mark on their clothes would they not the court asked, and the witness rC piled that there would be. If tho had come in contact with flour bag The young mems shoes were clcal with the exception Of small pal ticle of flour or what looked liA flour on one Of them. Cabelus said,
 Officer John O'kcef" testified to conversation he had with Pave