Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1929-12-06

rules, which seems to have inconven-
fenced only himself"
Roll Call on Ware.
The vote by which Mr.. Ware was de-
MED q seat follows:
Ayes-Senators Allen, Kansas; Blaine,
Wisconsin; Borah, Idaho; Brookhart,
Iowa; Capper, Kansas; Couzens, Mich
igan: Cutting, New Mexico; Dale, Ver~
mont; Frazier, North Dakota; Glenn,
Illinois; Howell, Nebraska; Johnson,
California: Jones, Washington; La Fol-
lette, Wisconsin: McCulloch, Ohio; Nc
Master, South Dakota; McNary. Oregon;
Metcalf, Rhode Island; Norris, Nebras-
ka; Nye, North Dakota; Patterson, Mis-
souri,; Sackett, Kentucky. Steiwer, Ore
gon; Thomas, Idaho; VAndenberg, Mich
igan; Republicans; IS.
Senators Ashurst, Arizona; Barley.
Kentucky; Black, AlabamaI Bratton,
New Mexico Brock. Tennessee, Brous-
sard, Louisiana; Caraway, Arkansas; ;
Connally, Texas; Copeland, New York;
George, Georgia. Glass, Virginia;
Harris, Georgia; Halves, Missouri; Hay
den, Arizona; Helm, Alabama, Nickel
lar, Tennessee; Overman, North Caro-
lima; Pittman, Nevada; RamSdell
Louisiana; Robinson, Arkansas; Shep-
pard, Texas: Simmons, North Carolina
Swanson, Virginia: Thomas Oklahoma
Trammell, Florida; Tydings. Maryland;
Wagner. New York; Walsh, Massa-
ACCOMPLISHMENTS, 50.
Shipstead, Minnesota-Farm Labor, /
Total, So.
Nays: Senators Bingham, Connecti-
cut; Gillette, Massachusetts,; Colds
borough, Maryland: Gould, Maine:
Greene, Vermont; Hale, Maine: Has
tings, Delaware; Hatfield. West Vir-
ginia; Kean, New Jersey; Reyes, New
Hampshire; Moses, New Hampshire;
Oddie, Nevada; Pitts, Colorado; Pine,
Oklahoma; Reed, Pennsylvania: Schall,
Smoot, Utah; Townsend, Delaware:
Wolcott. Connecticut; Waterman. Colo
RADIO. and Watson, Indiana-Repub-
licans, %.
The action of the Senate TODAY ir
the case of Mr.. Ware came on thu
Norris resolution which recited that the
special committee Of the Senate, headed
appointed in May 1925, to investigate
the alleged improper use of money
in senatorial primaries, had reported
that there were numerous and Variou,
instances of fraud and corruption Ar
behalf of the candidacy of William q
Ware; that there was spent in behalf Of
William 8. Ware in the primary election
!; by Ware and his friends q sum O
money exceeding $785,00O."
Committee Urged Seat Denial
1t further stated that Ware had
in no manner controverted the
truth of these facts. although given ful
opportunity Of presenting facts anC
arguments. The Norris resolution sale
that the special committee of the Sen.
ate had reported that Ware was not en-.
titled to seat In the Senate, and con.
tinued:
Whereas the Senate has delave,
action upon the report of the specia
committee on account of the illness o
William S. Ware, and whereas William
s. Ware has recovered from said illness
no further reason exists for longer de
lay on the part Of the Senate; there
fore be 1t
Resolved, That the report of the spe
cial committee be. and the same /
! hereby, approved and adopted; and b
: it further resolved that the said VII
liam S. Ware be, and he is hereby de
MED q seat In the United States Sen
ate"
When the Senate met at 1890 thi
morning there remained only an hou
and half in which to debate the Var
= case. Senator Cutting, Republican, O
:, New Mexico, declared his intention O
{ voting against seating Ware. He sal
I he would do so because he believet
e Wares election was tainted with frau
7 and not because of the large expenditur
e of money by Ware and his friends Il
the Pennsylvania primary. He pointe
= out that no limitation had ever bee
q set by law on the expenditures in sen
: atorial primaries. He deplored the fail
r ure to Ak such a limit.
= Senator Nye of North Dakota, Re
d publican, also announced his intentio
r to vote against the seating of Var
He said 1t was most unfortunate this
y in Furnishing Ware the Senate, was plac
!. ing in the hands Of Gov. Fisher til