The Bismarck tribune. [volume] (Bismarck, N.D.) 1916-current, 1928-01-10

" ..r.
aVnF Protlt smeuntine e ..:.-.~~:,:. l5,.o5s1s
plant aHoustsd to ...........-.r.-. sl,s2s5a
opss:tns profit d --~ y --,~ ,so,soss7
Der 81. 1927 the operating profits Of
the plant amount to ........-..... cl7,632M
TINT during t5s operation Il tSs plant:
81. is;F the setua operating SS :s si profits
s:': y: wv:
beennng and that during my administration the plant
s,2 created an operating capital or surplus Of than
Time to Pay Something on Bonds
t sI pay out tie
s 's' sss h e.: s b e
ever and above tie amount Of the construction bonds
ss1 nsr (: u ~o Ii e.
plant Or needed working capital recommend that this
s: ;:i:s s.. i'' is %
Laws Of 1929 seem to provide that the industrial Ccmp
q Mi and Elevator Association pay St.ss
seF such meSsys as the Commission shs deem sv..e:
imssuas the M and Elevator boads and further tie IL
q. Ss State iss.sues sSs;iss' sSs
pRS e such s,r y mt - J, !.
bend !+ x. sp:. IN building r. st
@ # 9 e. GeH;
s Elevator and STATE payable
to tie State Treasurer for the purpose Of carrying out ny
:fesson request your concurrence in my recommend
At the last legislative assembly the Senate appointed
sIH ss 70
tho
IT, 'st5
Aos yss s s0mm is also f @ and
Of having it report at the next session.
Administrative Changes Are Made
and sn e a b. ss e
se that the report not for publication but was fe
%s: :sas uss 4: sssss Ct s
report and also mad, made some changes in the
which made pubis This showed t. Be the intsas
Of the committee to afford constructive criticism regarding
the operation Of the plant and not purpose Of njurng
The reports communicated to me- as we'll as the last
report Of the committee which was published have not IS
yet been considered acted by the Senate or the
These reports published for other than
he is e''is' pa5is. &
:s:s !aa'sssy s
ns Of the plant and even aetd me ~, II:
ing honesty and integrity Of persons charge Of operating
r@A' session ssh Called to Consider Reports
The only courses open to me Of responding to such publicity
ssPf sSSss:
has been called for the purpose Of fully considering these
its report ii. Fact Finding Committee touched upon
three primary matter: q q Criticism from
g, Sale Of flour into eastern territory, and
have given attention to the investigation Of those mat
t.s and ready to submit to this honorable body reports
a. other matters Affecting the plant
Terminal Mn; Esvser STAT: Min modern
tured from our grain in competition with similar nstu
o in IS s Ss e
lens that similar institutions in other states find confront
the big problem Of others but addition ours must solve
pm for quality &
f in North Dakota and also to os this
i is entitled d. superior sY,a quality Of hard op9 spring wheat
Of products manufacrsd from such grain must neees-
sry practced by similar institutions in the markets Of
country order to understand what usually
'ss %ssss ss
ns Elevator in order to the plant at anywhere
hs operation Of 4: Iesin: Elevator and STATE
well established channels This was through the means Of
ssSis ss's
sold fer them on foreign markets. such as Minneapolis
Prior to the establishment of the Terminal elevator and
mill st Grand Forks products sold by farmers
oa tn. bsEs Of grade Of the grain o pnrchslsrs then
Teddy We know that the grain q our producers rssa in
tie basis Of protein content We know. also, that in
successfully flour from our wheat il not
ties p order to get the highest grade and best balanced
wAe4E but also that the wheat must be purchased with
taken in freight rates and transit values that apply in
porting the flour after it { manufactured
you will give attention to the question Of puyhes
nag wheat BY the State plant ct Grand Forks from the