New Britain herald., 1928-08-03
MADERS LOSE SUIT
 BY POINT OF LAW
(Continued from First Page)

number cut into the cylinder block, under the water outlet.
 After the accident, examination shows that no motor number ap- peared on the cylinder block of this car, so that there Was no serial number stamped into the car itself, as required by Sec. 17 B. Chapter 257, Public Acts, 1923.
 There was testimony that appli- cation for a registration was made but was returned to the plaintiff by the Connecticut motor vehicle de- partment. and was corrected to show the motor number upon which statement license was issued, al- though this motor number was not upon the block which was the usual place it should appear, and it has not been shown that it was on any other portion of the car, and no registration would have been issued had a motor number not have been furnished.
 Sec. IS of the Connecticut Motor Vehicle Laws, states, that registra- tion issued upon a material false statement of fact is void from the date of it's issue and should be sur rendered upon demand.
 Sec. 61, of Chapter 195. Public Acts. 1925, provides that no recovery shall be had in the courts of the state by the owner of 8 motor ye- hicle which has not been legally registered in accordance with Sec, 8, for injury to person or property received by reason of the operation l of such motor vehicle upon any pub i lie highway, making an exception in the case of nonresident whose car is legally registered
 Cites Precedent
 Here Judge Roche cites the case of Kaufman against Hageman i Conn. 100. page 12l in which action it was found that the legislature ill ] it's wisdom has determined that pub. lie policy requires new registration with each transfer and that the general rule of law, that the unlaW. full act must have some casual con- nection with the injury complained of should not be applicable in the case of illegally registered or un registered automobile; and it is fol us to apply the law as the legislature intended it.
 The memorandum of decision continues:
 The plaintiff has cited severa cases in all of which the question was not as to the actual illega registry, but as to whether condi tions under which were held to eiv, the person in possession of the N' the right to register it, and it Wa held that anyone who had an inter est in the vehicle under a specia title had sufficient interest to sup port registration in their name"
 For this reason neither of tn, plaintiffs cannot recover against tn, defendant because of illegal registr, of the ear and for this reason tn court rendered judgment for the de fendant.
 | Roth Drivers Blamed
 As to the complaint of Peter Ma lder, who was injured in the accideu the court finds that: "The situatio disclosed by the evidence compel the court to find that Peter Made was operating his car on the lei hand side of Carlton street, goin in northerly direction, and the de fendant George Furber was operat ing his truck on the left center c the highway and it was the duty C both to reasonably turn and giv half of the travelled portion of tn way to the other. Neither did thi and although Nader turned to tn left, the court cannot find that tn: was the sole proximate cause of tn collision as the action of the de fendant Furber in not seeing tn plaintiff in time to turn and giv him half of the travelled way, wa also a contributing cause. For thi reason the court finds that tn plaintiff cannot recover against tn defendants"
 The accident occurred on Novem ber 16. 1927, on Carlton street whil Peter Nader was on his way to wor in Hartford, driving his sisters ca,
 Furber was driving a milk true owned by Trumbull, proprietor ( "Pinnaclerex" farm in Plainville.