The Indianapolis times. [volume] (Indianapolis [Ind.]) 1922-1965, 1928-05-28

IN love love- with StRFatR Se m ms IT. % ny
4rss man is one Of the sweetest men
But he is as poor as a church mouse.
II I marry him we will have a long up-
NIL pull before we gather together enough
money TO make ends meet. Yet I know
The second man is one OF the solid
business men, types. He is. success in
me world ana ne has more than his share
could be happy with him, because I
never would have to worry about money.
OF course, want to marry for love. and
IAN am undecided Just what. should do.
Which man should marry?
l have read your column, Miss Lee for
years. and I have. read the wonderful ad-
vice you nave given to others. Perhaps
you can tell me what to do.
You certainly signed the letter
correctly Janus, you know, is tine
two-faced Roman god who looked
both ways at the same time. The
month of January is named for him.
Too bad you are not twins so you
could marry both men. If you mar
ry the poor man, you always will
have before you the vision of the
wealth you might have had.
But II you marry the rich man,
you will eat out your heart for the
love that is denied you.
On the surface those two state
nlents seem correct. But not know
ing the personalities of both men.
1t Is impossible for me to Judge.
Your heart will have to be your
guide. Make up your mind what
you want to do, and then put the
other man out Of your mind anG
heart forever.
Once you have made a decision
stick to it. Play the game, my dear
girl and don't complain if you lose
And don't boast if you win. Be a
sportsman.
The following two letters were re-
ceived today from readers interested
IN the story in the column a few
Gays ago on knees. It is strange
That the married woman uphold:
knees, while the married man think.
knees are an abomination.
Dear Martha Lee: for one eniov ono,
looking knees. If one has good fookinI
knees. why not show them?
an married. and my husband believe
Ansse.iengtn dresses are all right.
less, dresses next. one is lust about a
good an argument as the other. "
american girls. dress to please them
Why be ashamed to show pretty knees
Every one has been showing their knee
them. BABE.
Dear Martha Lee: The discussion O
short skirts and knees which you recenti
introduced interests me very much I ar
strongly against the short skirts as the
are worn today. And yet am youn
But knees knees. knees are becomin
knees first. Divine Providence has cel
tainly made big mistake by creating S
many women with ugly legs and knees.
It doesn't matter II girl or wcma
she feels that she must follow style an
then she wears 'em short
On the street car or bus she pulls en-
pulls at her skirt to try to cover at lea,
the roll OF her stocking: =,
ads in. the top of the car rather tina
gaze at the bare knees. II he is observe
looking sot he gets e glance from the vlcti
The argument that short skirts al
healthful is carried entirely too far tt
skirt that struck two or three inches b.
these extremes Of today, and besid
didn't display. the color Of the garter
it seems the women feel they are givir
the men a great treat. II survey we
to be made, II would be proven that I'll
majority Of men would say the womt
And those men who favor such extren
short skirts are the ones a girl would