Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, 1927-03-21

The judge said he would reserve
decision until a specific occa sion arose.
The jury returned and Mr.. Cameron
took the witness stand
Mr.. Cameron identified bound vol
| ume of the Dearborn Independent
containing the first issue under Ford S
| ownership.
An article on the first page, he said,
was his to some extent. He had
worked It over, he said. At that time,
he said. he had never seen Mr.. Ford.
Gallagher called for other bound
volumes of the Independent, which
Mr.. Cameron identified
Seven volumes, taking the issues to
the present time, were identified by
Mr.. Cameron.
Gallagher asked Cameron if he had
any part in preparation of an article
on April II. 1924. Cameron replied
1T very probably passed through my
hands"
Cameron said he had considered pre-
viously publication of this kind of
an article.
with whom did you confer as TO
this article?' asked Gallagher.
Hanley objected to the question as
showing malice toward one. The judge
permitted the question to stand. mas
malice on the part of both defendants.
Question Is Changed.
| Gallagher changed his question then
| to: with whom did you discuss the
article referring to Aaron Sapiro as
member of Jewish conspiracy"
Cameron said he had discussed il
with editorial subordinates. He said
no one held a position above him on
Z ha no T16annn6nnt 10
discuss with Ford the article before
him regarding Sapiro, nor had he ever
discussed Sapiro with Ford, he testi-
| fed
A question AS to whether Ford ever
discussed with Cameron or any one
the article regarding Sapiro was OBJ
jected to by Ford counsel and sus-
tanned by Judge Raymond.
Gallagher read from the Independ-
emit which referred to ring of Jews
on the back of the American farmer"
Cameron identified it as the leading
article on the front page of that is
sue. Gallagher passed the article
around to the jury for perusal.
Gallagher had a hard time getting
an admission from Cameron that he
recognized Mr.. Ford as a superior.
After dozen efforts he phrased a
question that withstood defense OBJ
lection.
Woman Juror Takes Notes.
A bobbed haired woman juror as
sduousy applied herself to TAX
ing notes as Gallagher questioned
Cameron.
Because of the peculiarities of law
governing Cameron's appearance on
the witness stand, Gallagher informed
the court he was being careful not
to cross-examine or lead the witness.
Under the State law, which for the
moment was accepted in the Federal
Court, Cameron was called by Sapiro,
although classified an an unfflendly
witness.
Referring to the article mentioning
Sapiro as a member of Jewish
conspiracy, Cameron testified he
didn't have in mind the name Of any
one Jew who was a member of the
band of Jews referred to in the article
and which was supposed to control
Sapiro.
He said he did not know at the
time of publication that not one dollar
had been received by so-called Sapiro
organizations from Jewish bankers.
Gallagher objected to the apparent
hostility of the witness and asked the
Judge to instruct him to confne
himself 10 answering questions
Questioned About Terms.
Cameron testified at the time of the
publication of the story he was under
the impression that several Jewish
advertising agencies were connected
with the Saplro associations. Asked
by Gallagher II he did not know
one association. the prune growers
employed a Jewish advertising firm,
Cameron said he did not. He did not
know. he said, that no Jew was asso-