The Washington times. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1902-1939, 1927-06-03

plaInant. realizing that It was idle
to object thereto, finally consented
that they try living apart.
That Immediately upon obtaining
oss-complainant's said consent,
cross-defendant insisted that cross.
complainant express said consent
before her physicians, ana she said
to cross-compla that this sug.
gestion from her was made for
technical reasons, because she did
not want ross-complainant there
after to accuse her Of deserving or
abandoning him.
That thereafter cross-defendant
with her mother. lived for q period
In z house separate and apart from
said house Of cr0ss-complainant
that while said parties were thus
living apart, the cross defendant con.
tinued to seek and have the com.
pany Of the aforementioned young
man; that thereafter defendant
expressed the conviction that she
preferred, after all, to be with the
eross-complatnant and to forego the
company or said particular young
man and that she wished to return
to the house Of cross-connplainan
and have his company and his com.
tort ana thereupon cross.defendant
did. Of her own free win and accord,
return to oss-complainant's house
ana there lived with him happily
until said elder child was born.
Lived HarmOniOusIy
That from the time the cross.de.
PENDANT returned to cross.complain-
ants house, they lived together har.
montously as husband and wife: that
cross-complainant sought the com.
pany Of cross-defendant and tried TO
be with her as much as the nature
Of the work in which he was an.
gagged permitted.
That about three or four months
before the separation. cross.cor1.
plainant discovered that the CROSS
oeIenoant was associating with and
frequently In the company of an
snHutomooile salesman, person dis
Ilkeo ana entirely diSapproved of by
cross-complainant: that cross.corn.
plalnant by all proper means remon.
sLraIed with cross.defendant against
ner association with said automobile
salesman and against being seen
with him In public places dancing
with him and drinking LIQUOR. Ia
ner inviting him and others to the
mouse OK the crosg-complainant. and
az times when the cross-compIainan
was absent from said house: that
cross-defendant denied the cross.
compartments suggestion, advice.
ana remonstrance against such con.
llnued association with such auto.
noDile salesman and conduct with
Mns ana persisted in her association
Win SAID automobile salesman.
Dancing in Resorts
That for q considerable period
next proceeding the time when the
cross-complainant ana cross-defenI.
ant separated, cross-defendant hahif.
ualIy occupied almost all Of her
TIME dancing in hotels, cafes. ana
peach resorts In and about the CITY
OF Los Angeles ana other nIaces
ana thereby absented herself from
nome ana her said children TO the
SrIeVous neglect Of said children.
1nat on numerous occasions cross.
ueIenoant did not return to her
nome until or 3 o'clock IN fhe
OIhlng; that on many of these &C.
cdAons said cross-defendant was ac.
cOLnpanled by said automobile sales.
man that she was frequently in the
company OF said automobile sales.
nan ana over the protests ana
against the wishes of the cross.con1.
plSlnant' invited said automobile
salesman TO their home and enter.
famed him and others there at such
cess. ~ ga
That many times after such occa.
sions, cross.complainant said to
crosS-oefendant in all kindness that
ner continued absence from her
nome and said CONSEQUENT neglect
OF her children ana her aid danc.
ms through all hours Of the night
ana gay, and drinking liquor were
INJURIOUS to the welfare of said
children and injurious to her reputa.
tion; that croSs-defendant continu.
ally replied to accomplishment
with irritation and anger that she
old not intend to change her mode
OF me to please him and that. If
ne did not like her conduct he
coulo arrange with her for q divorce.
Opposed Divorce
That cross-complainant, to her
suggestion Of divorce, entered ais
protest and appealed to crossde.
PENDANT to consider the interests OF
their children; that finally shortly
prior to their said separation. cross.
derendant declared to cross com.
plalnant that she did not desire TO
ilve with him any longer and that
sne wished to be divorced from him.
ana thereupon she asked cross-com.
plalnant coldly what financial ar
rangement he could make with her:
tnat noncompliance replied that
ne would provide abundantly and
would give her more than she would
% entitled to by law. and that he
would make such abundant provi-
sion Tor her without consideration
wnatsoeyer Of any litigation: that
crosS-defendant then demanded to
know what cross-complainant was
worth; that rosS.complainant re-
pied that he did not see why that
should be discussed at that time, be-
cause, regardless of what he was
worth, he would see to it that she
was properly and fairly provided
That cross-complainant did not
cnange her mode Of hfe,, but on the
contrary, she increased her in.
ouIgence In. such vain and frivolous
pleasures; that the cross-complainant
- informed and verify believes that
On various and sundry occasions the
crosS-deiendant drank liquor to ex-
cess and while under the influence
OF liquor her conduct became IN.
Womanlyy unseemly, and undignified
IN speech and action: that by her
SAG conouct, she was thrown more
ana more often in contact with aaid
automobile salesman hereintofore
mentioned, until finally she became
infatuated with him was constantly