Evening star., 1927-03-23

the declaration and Mr.. Gallagher got
a rebuke from the court when, re-
naming seated, he sought to bring
the defense attorney back into the
field covered by the formal allega-
tions in the suit.
IL desire no controversy with coun-
sell" doomed Senator Reed.
Counsel first will rise TO his feet,
then address his remarks to the
court" ruled Judge Raymond
very well, sir" replied Gallagher.
Very well. doomed Sena tor Reed.
Sapiro got back into the trial as an
attorney when he saved Gallagher's
voice by some more extensive reading.
The trial was dragging again. but
Ahe 80 spectators held their seats.
hoping something might happen, and
the outside lobby again had 200 or so
waiting for the seats there was no
hope of getting.
Gallagher dropped his previous air
Of Difference toward Senator Reed and
assailed Reed for getting outside the
evidence in his opening statement
several days ago.
Reed Takes Exception.
The plaintiff has been smarting
under the Senator's remarks ever
since and desrous OF answering them.
His first opportunity previously was
considered to be some five weeks or
so away on rebuttal.
Senator Reed took exception to Gal
laghers remarks and arose TO combat
them, but Gallagher replied that he
simply had intended to state that the
Senator had not wandered intention
ally.
Senator Reed sat down with a NUT
tered, "Oh. well, it's just matter of
a difference in judgment, | see"
SapirO Takes Part Again.
Sapiro again took a part in pro-
ceedings when he read letter dated
August 26, 1924, TO the Dearborn In
dependent from Charles Cherry, a
northwest grower.
1t stated Sapiro had nothing to do
with losses Of the Northwest Hay
Association. Unscrupulous dealers
had been responsible for Irregular
tiles. it said.
1T seems unfair" declared the
writer, for the Independent, in Its
attack against Jewish activities, to
involve the Northwest Hay Associa-
ton"
The letter detailed the organization
OF the co operative dSSocidtIoIl, Stiet-
tion of it's officers, their duties, meth
DDS of handling crops and contracts
with farmers.
When Sapiro finished reading the
letter Gallagher quoted decisions
which he said were authority for
Introduction of evidence from third
nerson bearing on the case.
He declared he stood ready to prove
the falsity of every statement in the
article read by Sapiro, but at this
time he wanted only to show the
Dearborn editors were informed of the
inaccuracy of the publication.
Ford Attorney Reads Letter.
stewart Hanley, Ford attorney, read
- latter TO f. r. donaldson of the In
danandent staff from III. A. Dunn,
writer of the article regarding the
Northwest Hay Association. Dunn de-
fanded the accuracy of the sotry at
tackled by Cherry and quoted his au-
thoritv Cherrys address was given
as Yakima. Wash.
Indpa RAYMOND said the letter from
,,berrv TO the Dearborn Publishing
70 could not be admitted as evidence,
for TO do so would open the way for
100 many such communications. As
to Dunn's reliability. he said report
or doctor or lawyer could make mis-
takes and yet be very competent.
Dunns reputation would have to ne
decided by his general reputation, the
Judge said, rather than by what any
one said of him ip letters to the In
dependent.