The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1927-12-17
Can Hearst Injure His Profession?

A
unmpeachabe documentary evidence that the very t INSTALL
en the against Mexico appeared with TWO
different dates in the editions of the New YORK M
puporng photos of original document the catahs
press of New York morally indignant Hearsts al
legged degradation of the newspaper profession IN general
The Hearst series of forgeries faxed documents some
of which proved have been concoced right here New
City aroused adverse comment on the part OF the o
metropolitan capitalist until Hearst himself IN SnVe
ling crawling exhibition before sympathetic senate committee
admitted whole series based upon the activity OF one
of his miserable heng unprncped adventurer who
has had chekerd including that OF spy on the Mexican
border for the military intelligence service
At this late date the kept press bemoans the fact
Hearst has sued its profession Says the New YORK 1e
Wall Street organ par excellence
the results far to discredit the methods used s
t Of th ~ in General # IS this injury to his own profession
Mr. Hearst which Will most keeny @
resent"
The Times despite it's against Hearst has fol-
consistent policy publishing stories against the Union
Socialist Soviet Republics from the whteguard and mperat
forgery mills Riga Berlin Bucharest and other nests OF sWnd
who pay will sort of document 1t published
as authentic the forged the British
system justify the tory raid ARGOS the raid on the Soviet
embassy Picking and this day frequently refers edtoa to
mythical Zoev letter used the tory elections In Britain
that placed Baldwin and his cutthroats in power
The only reason that and other papers today be-
labor Hearst this millionaire proprietor of chain Of
gutter newspapers speaks certain section of the capitalist
opposed dominant of Wall Street One role
Of Ambassador Morrow of the House of Morgan in Mexico
trying President Gales of Mexico to the interests
big finance capitalists with heavy investments IN Mexican
This threatened rappochemen between the House OF
morgan the Mexican viewed with alarm by
OIL land and mine for whom he speaks
Hence his chain of used for the purpose OF COM
batng this tendency.
The CooidgeMelon-Kelogg administration however, can
dscai responsibility for such attacks Mexico 1t is
evident that the Hearst based their
policies obviously followed until Morrow began his efforts to
Gales Wall Street influence The Hearst
sisted without that their campaign perfect har
mony with the Coolidge policy. Certainly Kellogg secretary Of
state repeated the of infamous attacks against the
Mexican government.
The New York Times and other that try to confne
the gracefu of the Hearst Hearst
his individual associates guilty of form of distortion of
fact equally vile Why doesn't the Times
get indignant Coolidge and his cabinet members who issued
similar statements against Mexico?
difference between the Hearst publications and the New
York Times be viewed Realistically struggle between
good newspapeshose who uphold metaphysical
entity honest journalism and those who oesmrch
the profession by resorg the publication OF fake documents.
It conflict that has deep roots refectng division
within the ranks of the capitalist class itself Hearst represents
smaller fry while the Times speaks for Wall Street 1t
conflict of policy.
The capitalist press whether of the blatant Hearst cabre,
suave but the less mendacou odesabshed
the the the class the particular division
prostuted capitalism, who ready any time grovel
just as low as is those who them
depraved profession debased by
specimen William Randolph Hearst
I'M ----------