The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1927-10-07
Wall Streets Latest
Mexican Instruction

thing tainted with the dollar sign
that pervades the politically active
section of the Mexican population.
THE defeat of this latest Wall Street
instruction does not, however,
eliminate the danger of intervention
in Mexico. The same sinister forces
that since 1910 have backed hireling
military adventurers who sell out to
the highest bidder are still malig-
nantly active. are still plotting to i'm
perialist conquest of Mexico, are still
waiting for a favorable excuse to
throw armies of the youth and man.
hood of the United States into that
country to be murdered or rot of dis
! ease in the interest Of Standard Oil
the holders Of claims on mineral
lands, or the other great land holders
for whom the vile Hearst publications
speak in their incessant campaign OF
SANDER against those Mexicans who
resent such organized plundering OF
their country.
With Dwight w. Morrow, one of the
Morgan, holding the office of Wall
Street ambassador in Mexico City
and intriguing in behalf of his blood
streaked class, the conspiracies
against that country will assume new,
more subtle, but withal sinister and
dangerous forms. There is no base
device within the power of human
fiendishness that will not be used to
strive to embroil this country into in
vasion of Mexico. The present stag
gering defeat of their plans will only
make the predatory beasts more eau
tious.
THE workers of America must re-
member the long conspiratorial
history of imperialist meddling across
the border. The history of the past
is proof that any future war against
Mexico under any pretext whatsoever
is bound to be inspired by Wall Street
and we must carry on such a deter
mined struggle against intervention
that no government will dare invade
that country.
The working class of Mexico, or at
least that section that has some con-
ception of the proletarian struggle
realizes that in spite of the fact that
the present government is not Ia
Dor government, but a nationalist
capitalist government, it must be de-
Tended against the threat of i'm
perialist intervention.
Only under such conditions can the
revolutionist, the feminist, speak OF
war of defense. In a struggle be-
tween imperialist nations in order tc
decide the question of redivision OF
the world or any part of it there can
be no such thing as war of defense
and the so-called spokesman of labor
who urges defense of an imperialist
government is traitor and disgrace
to his class. But in colonial anc
semi-colonial countries the workers
must join in the defense against i'm
perialist conquest.
Not only must the revolutionary
workers try to mobilize the whole
working class for defense against i'm
perialism, but they must also main
tain distinct policy separate from
that of the bourgeois government anc
at all times maintain their identity
as the most aggressive and deter
mined fighters against imperialism by
constantly criticising the shortcom-
ings and half-measures of the ma
tionalist government and in the course
of the development of the struggle
convincing the masses that only the
proletarian revolution can guarantee
the complete defeat of imperialism.
While aiding the government
against Imperialism the Mexican
workers must be ever watchful. con-
stantly on the alert to force Gales
and Oregon and the rest of the ma.
tionalists to take an ever more ag.
gressive stand against the imperial
lists. By maintaining a separate
policy the revolutionary workers
must be prepared to take the lead il
the struggle the moment the bour.
geois nationalists show signs Of
wavering or compromising with the
invaders.
In such struggle the workers Of
the United States must aid the work
ers Of Mexico and fight with every
weapon at hand to make impossible
the success of any attempted Wal
Street Intervention.