Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975, 1926-11-02
WATERv|LLE
State OF MAINE
80 County, Superior Court
pns0'r ovember Term, 1895

1. Dilovins cases CO. y
.,,-Brooks vs. 81. VA "
W." W.T. National Bank VS.. Vol
Sratty, NJ. L. Rosen' Fortianu.
- ;t Dispatch co. VS.. Wolman
p'~t'1Tr . Boyle; NJ. T. INosen' '
nnd ,,..,,,O,, p,,c.,rs
,,s-Msservey vs.
ion; Rogers p,ao,,,r~
l.i-strs'1Hq H. Thurlough, Pittsfield.
W., scoesin 4 Kennebec Rail-
#ig-AndroSo0Rire nnan. Andrews, N. &
way Geo t Z. Thompson. Bangor.
T.rett VS.. Lepsitz' Peacock FER
US & Weeks .,: - -,
Ems s;rsburg ct al vs.. Sallem 81 al
~ I, Berman, LeWls'oh' L.
Tliiott vs.. Robinson. bidchins-
i'stt[ I'M: sawtelle. ,v R,sct-
sordon Ell al VS. Peavey Dia'A-
ington; Carleton. p,rs+.ed.
-Brown VS.. hoFI iu'''' eau
s ss'ers vs.. Rubbins & TT. VIM,
Mahoney, Por'iahu' i'iA'-
sisae Petn'r VS.. Hallett Pea
cS s.Sa,ev VS.. Carr. w. F. Jude,
G O,rhards Exclusive Shop VS..
smith. Blackington. -.
Sli,rlo ct al VS.. Bogas ct ais.
p pssou IS. King. Rogers; Boyle,
n Neon Us. Bogas. Levine; Boyle.
:ss- 4;ng rs, Michaud. II. e. Weeks
-, Nation VgIton VS.. Withee. Maher; P, A.
=, S SIrnaer VS. wolman. Dubord;
=. T Tobey VS.. Quincy. Eaton.
w 5n,berland Sign Co. vs.. Oakland.
'5'- paigrsde Silver Fox Ranch Co.
Peacock; BOYLE.
,,l-Huston & Co, VS.. Patten' Pea-
| -, T posenthal vs.. Gosselin. Andrews,
\ & G.; Hunton. ~ .
| =. .PP;;;;tt Ie National Banl, VS..
~ brown & TT. II. F. Coolidge;
Poyden Y. Brown.
a., tyntchins VS.. Bean. Mclean,
'IF ogg & Southland; BuzzeN &
-, .so oiHs Go. vs.. Berliawsky. Black
r,-King ct al VS.. Bogas ct al. Du-
bord: Boyle. ~
ni-Albee VS.. Arsenault Peacock;
Frank A. Mercy.
nh-pichmond VS.. Levine ct ais.
' Plunstead, Locke, Perkins & Will
hanson; Andrews, Nelson < Gar
n,-Psnney, Comprt vs. Daggett.
" Joly. Buzzell & Thornton.
gA-Livingston VS. Bigelow. Hunton.
9s-Smith VS.. Clukey. Smith; Bart
n.-Emerson Electric Co. VS.. Miller
Optical Co. Maxwell & Conquest,
Bangor; Perkins & Weeks.
pi-Rockwood VS.. Bradstreet An
drews. y. 4 G.; Arthur Richie,
Belfast.
s-Pomerleau VS.. yiolette. Dubord;
Boyle.
s!7--Proctor & Bowie Co, VS., Coates,
Peacock; Hunton..
tss-Hayes VS.. Nightengale ct ais.
Weeks; Bartlett.
>e.-ycLean ct al Recvr's VS.. Milo
Textile Mills. Mclean. F. q s;
C. ". & H. N. Hayes, Dover
Foxcroft.
ssi-Hutchins vs. Hanson. Mclean,
F&S.; A. L. Blanchard. Bansor.
12i-Mooers VS.. Pouliotte. Backing
ton; Dubord.
s3a-Warner & Co. VS.. Daviau, Boyle;
Vi-champagne vs.. Breton, Boyle;
Dubord.
'42-Pelletier VS.. Waterville, Fairfield
& Oakland Ry. Dubord; Perkins
& Weeks.
7i3-Peletier VS.. W. f. & Q. Ry. Du-
bord; Perkins & Weeks.
'i6-Pouliotte VS.. Mooers. Dubord;
Blackington.
'i7--Sarson VS.. Hollingsworth & Whit
n.y Co., Dubord: Eben Littlef1eld.
ts-Proctor & Bowie Co. VS.. Frank
lin Service Station. Peacock; Per-
kins & Weeks.
1ia-Waterville Sentinel Co. VS.. Win
slow. Marden; Blackington.
1ss-Clark VS.. Drew ct al. Clark; Le-
vine
15s-Witham VS.. Poulin. Smith; Locke,
Perkins & Williamson.
iG-Bernard VS.. Barker. Merrill &
Merrill; Perkins & Weeks.
1,e-West End Furniture Co. VS.. Pou-
lin. Furniture Co. Maxwell &
Conquest; Andrews, Nelson &
Gardiner.
's-0akes VS.. Poulin. Cover & Shurn-
way; Ceny.
. Hs-Scribner VS.. Condos G. Tr. w. S.
Cole, Bangor; Heselton.
"l-bessey VS.. Packard. W F. Jude;
~. Buzzell & Thornton.
Hd--Alden VS.. Mooers ct al. Andrews,
A.. \: & G.; Blackington.
a!-Webber Auto Service VS.. Crosby
e al. Mclean, F. & S.; NJ w.
-, Epstein, Bangor.
@-Iillson VS.. Robinson, ct al. Black
-. lngton; Hunton.
"'--Marshall VS.. Edes. Blackington:
Martin.
"-Scribner VS.. Nichols ct al. Black
Mgton; Hiram Gerrish, Brown
"-Tillson VS.. Linscott. Blackington:
MGardiner Motor Co. VS.. Hart.
70 66iiackngton; Andrews. n. & G.
'''-Dihsmore Ell al VS.. Howard.
ga B5!ackington; Bartlett.
tanning vs.. Barrows. Backing
~ ion; Carl Henderson, Pennington.
zane VS.. Same. Blackington;
Wv Woman ct al VS.. Wald. Black
a., ,Mgton; Plumstead.
''-Aeliey ct al VS.. Dearborn. Black
N, pssion; Atchley, Bartlett.
Pinds VS.. Thomas. Crafty;
'''-IIsssard VS., Eastman. pubord;
NJ locke, Perkins & Williamson.
hssar1 VS.. Hagland ct al. Du-
N S%9rd; Blackington, Peacock.
"-Morneau VS.. Bedard' Dubord.
-, Martin. W. ''-
"'-tlcher, Admr'x VS.. Goldrup. Du-
r uuiu' Chester Fl. Mills, Jack
'-ss "1n VS.. A, & K. Railway. Du-
W;~6outin vs. Same. Dubord.
soGiln VS.. Cakes. Dubord; Cover
n, Shumway.
DDasgggett Chocolate Co. VS.. Salem.
Il, gggbord; Boyle.
.,ooey vs., Maine Container Co.
Ia,. ais Eaton: Plumstead, Bart
c mneeier ct al VS.. Haley. Pea
10 WWcE Cyrus Blanchard, Wilton.
F..cormick VS.. Clement. Peacock;
Ni-uinanK l.. Ames, Norridgewock.
y; uusnIy VS.. Grant. Peacock.
THsselund VS.. Bickford. Peacock:
~ TTsnry VS.. Grant. Peacock.
c, uSpp VS., Durell ct al. Peacock;
k,, noid 20 VS.. Salem ct al. Per-
In Sns 4 Weeks: Rogers.
EiS ns VS.. Freeman & Tr Per-
to- ANS 4 Weeks; Gallert.