The Washington times. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1902-1939, 1926-08-04
The Analysis
Oueetiona IO6.Il1 Inclusive

&
Yea. MI. Wu came back in the
kitchen. He shut the door between
the furnace room ana the kitchen. He
held the revolver in his hand. ! think
thaE time he looked at the revolver and
90 on. Yes think he put something
NJ 8. bullets) in Il. I think the got
the bpllets) from the big drawer IN
the corner ss IN the kitS Sis n Sspas nsn
was any murderer ever 80 cool
ana withal so stupid? Not the
slightest regret about Hsie and no
concern over possible discovery.
But at once he reloads his pistol,
evidently preparing to shoot either
Or. WONG or me, or both.
Wu's pistol, 1t viii be remeTn-
bered, WAC found with two empty
shells In 1t. This. was not q mod
ern weapon with an ejector. The
detectives Insist upon having all the
shooting done with Wu's pistol,
which has to, therefore, be reloaded
sometime. In section Xxx, they have
me take the pistol and put twc
bullets in II. This is In order that
may XIII Mr.. WI in accordance
with sipolice theory" and leave two
empty shells in the pistol in accord
anee with known facts.
Between the events noted in this
section. when WI re.loads his pts.
toll and In q later section when !
put only two bullets in It thow, by
the way, would I know / was go
ing to need just two bullets and
no mofe2) the only shooting done IS
the alleged shooting Of DR.. Wong
by Mr.. WI. In one section Il think
one shot and In q later section Il
think two or three" (shots) after
they went up stairs.
This would make q total OF Il
think" three or four shots, fired
Dr. Wong's body actually showed
two bullet woundsl
AZ Wu's pistol was reloaded just
prior to this shooting, according to
the detectives, this would leave at
least two unfired cartridges In Wu's
pistol, enough for me to use on Wu.
But this would leave possibly six
empty shells in the pistol which
was found with only two in 1t! SO
the pistol is mysteriously emptied
Of everything until In a later Sec
ton the detectives have me put
just two cartridges in 1t with which
am supposed to kill Mr.. WI, and
this leaves the pistol az It was
derful management
Actually, they must know that
the shooting was not done with
Wu's pistol. In fact, Burlingame
on the stand testified she was not
satisfied that the gun IN the mis-.
sion house was the only gun In the
possession OF the man who com
mitted the murder" All the evil
defce points to expert gunmanship.
Five shots took effect In the three
bodies, each one Of them fatal. Two
shots (possibly three, testimony con-
flcts here) went wild, and these
were most probably fired from Wu's
pistol.
The weapon must have been
modern one with an ejector. as
empty shells were found in places
where it seemed logical that the
murderer stood. It must also have
had silencer. as there was testi-
lnony from neighbors Of hearing
only one, possibly two, shots be-
tween IL and 1 o'clock that night.
II sevenD or eight shots had been
tired from Wu's pistol, 1t is q GER
! tainty that more than one would
have been heard, az two neighbors
are known to have been awake, one
| having been awakened by the
crash Of the lamp and the sounds of
fighting next door.
Questions 112-121 Inclusive
Then he (wu) kept quiet q little
while. He walked around kitchen
little while without saying anything.
No. didn't say anything TO him; At
forwards he said to himself but not
to me--hs hate this fellow very much.
Afterwards he sat down and talked
with me-wo discussed the check
aghin-about getting money on the
check. He wanted me to get the
money. We did not say anything
about (Wu) shooting Mr.. Hsie. was
just scared 1t time did not feel
bad. have no connection with Mr..
Hsie. We stayed in the kitchen and
talked about check until DR. Wong
| came in.
This shows no knowledge OF
human ! nature or criminal psy
chology. It would be impossible
for two young fellows committing