Putnam patriot., 1926-09-17
GIRL ON WITNESS STAND SAYS
 wETHERBEE KILLED HER BABY
lcsat.nssa rom page ansl

fcoatinasd from page onsl - s rs lad served 9a g
 within sFe Eeass A statute enacted iH 1925 allows either side
 taa who has sarV-
 sse Challenge
 Hrss- atary.
 Eo F ur born 6r Paris FHs Tor Eear resident lt nra 4rar paint er and rs~rerr eetsf Ns zuF1f E1
 Two More Qualify
 Af.eF s5faaz z hal been
 st sea HasHs
 eepte8 as No. and N frre F. Salisbury d HariWare ea-# Piainasld and Daniel ; M 4FF farmer. of P0mfref
 Charies P Erenn. S--laH1 farm CT was ehailenred by the fafer- and HnnrV E Ami#aH AHf=r ehafiereed hH the Etate. The fefeH used three more of their preemrtarF challenges ir ercusfnz Oscar Jahnaaz 6f Weodstaek David Kick of Wool etoek ard Archie Gall of Scotland
 William D Wrigat. storekeeper of Canterbury. uBf' '5fed as iuror %o. ! 2 a-f Edward E. Freeman af ster- Inc painter became juror Eo
 Edward r. Crass of Willimautie Was aseHaed hecausa be worked in same zfnre as juror &o
 Walter Hoffman. Hampton. told .ae court that he had contract to carry twenty pupils hack ard f0Hsh ts school and was excused by The court
 : Tsamss Ga~uaH of Brooklyn was challenged bg the state John r. Bas- saf RroekIen. ezeaee8 on account of Illness Asa RH-3ics Hamuton. ey- e8sea haFaaes hs had farmed an auin- ion Naarler E. PIekefH Ashford excused berausa aoao#eH fa capital rBrisfmert Timothy Colbert had formed an aBinien and afteE short questioning Frank W Dagge' Plain feid was challenged by tHe sfafe. With eight men la fhe jarY box tta caurt declared the noon resssz
 Af,~rnooa sessior
 When caurt reconvenei fer tHe # afternoon session eleven taIesmen were examined and excused hy the court fhe majority being for having firm opinions of fhe guiIt 9r inno- ceree of the accused CT tneir objee- tHar fa capital HaaI= hment.
 The twelfth man examined. Naro- fgaH ! F1arHia=. a moving HiefuHe theatre manager af P'arfel5 Was aerar.st az Ha.rar Aa
 TFraa Hrsra were examined and eH ez-s3 Hv tHe eaarf FHa fourth daH H HheftH q farmer. z tHaE 6ss sHzrr Hf GarzeaazH= HeHH
 Sa f1rHes .aFFmHa were a-seH
 ar fHH @ H#H Hr f5r rnzI E #a9H GaEtsHHlf fafa
 fraa F
 sf b. tr tH s arH zafen#
 None Qualify
 THsra= #.taa .Ha5 f would D.
 saar a= q .EezF#. at .lrra.a.1 aal#i be taken faHaaHHe morning er whether HH HF HaHlH te H#se t# HIl tks f He aHuarznE 9rEmen once f# #a #ae#e# za summon In maEs ta#e#n#a aa5 soon the deputy zheHiH H=HFHf r fourteen Putnam ner THev Werr Prosper Niegard. George RFf5aaaIt &1fred Caisse. Geerfe ! Padgrft. Edward N Nullaa FraHl ,#y fueIor. Arthur [ Keith. Jesse E R#aH i l. Mansfield. Carleton W i Uarfee. LeRoy J fripp Joseph Roi OHeer p Bancroft and Earle C. Rog ers
 } Caieze was excused by the tate & Was Edward MuliHn Carlton W Dur fes and LeRty THpr were chaiienk ea hv fhe defendant All others wer. .v--=aa by the court + WAS nE' o'clock and court adjourned afte Judge Baoth had cautioned -He HF 8rs aot fa discuss the case with arE one and ordering 3 panel 9f twenty ! more talesmen summoned Jury Box Soon Filled t Court came in urauftlg af @ g.net ! Thursday morn and examination Y inc twenty tnleHH summoned heeai ! at one tr Is fFar fff.er rste Lester E W af Hrs Rt aeeentsd E fHe #ate. aars tHf fh defense conferred ars t"r fr H time rar. litet tra 1alt al proved aEeaat tle ar# ta was fl'ea
 I'm frfH# uaH.# -rr- tha defendant aftsr ra HHs.l H HFH tI=H FfH hfa-#.a HTt Na -a.It HH tl- tat tz W TaFdE1 GEaaia Ha .Hsaa H sh# -tafa H Effh HreeH .Had
 rHl ftzs'=.a remalalsr ter eeHrlr Here called r ffam ft- haH Hhrars and fta#r Hames Were called Hra rr-' twa responded iH feeble voice Thi. rausfd Judge Booth t7 remark Speak ur lau wont ert that iay lee f vau dart He then thanked chem fa5 heIHg present and diseharse5 them
 } The ury was ready for service and . were boiled following which thl lengthy indictment WIS read to then , hy Mis- Bradford assistant clerk. and , the taking 0f testimony began. Frat Witness