The Washington times., 1926-06-15
fcdntinned nom First Fagel


his own S7d,00O PERSONAL axpendi-
ures Were made from the proceeds
De the $50, 600, note.
The Greenfield note wHs not
breviuuslv mentioned I'M Wares rev
bort Of Sihis own, personal expelldl-
lures inI the. campaign which he
swore tctaIed only $71, 900.
Ware was recalled 70. the stand
Ii the START of t0day's session
Senator Reed Questioned him first
lbout hiss meeting with y. Mel
on, Max CT Lesiib and ", Harry
Baker at the Hotel Washington
ters.
.sTlils conference was called 10
lee whether yoIli genfIeEnen could
lgrea on d CamCidafss for governor
Df PennsylVania7 Reed suggested.
Undoubtedly id Ware.
"Did you discuss your candidacy
or the Senate with mr. Mellon r.
II don't think 50. sid Ware.
we talked chiefly al50u0 the COVER
lorsliip. Mr.. Lesiie end Mr.. Baker
teres for Edward u Biedleman.
hr. Mellon was opposed to him
Wills was non c0n1Infttal. We
leacFied no decision
Ware said he ntst Nellani ain
he next day az tie Has,fl0NsE
Hotel here. Mellon h adds.I II
listed the candida should eoEae
Eomt west 0G fiae AIEa
what candidaos cans ft9Iu tliat
IectiOn Of the aBEte
.'John 8. B1sIae
ssThe MsElOnw ara str0llsr in
he western haIE o. tie State
They are hs1tsr kao5l oaat
here"
Wasn't t4rs AfayfIower meeting
.alIed to- pun gosI out of the sen
ttoriaf race so Pepper would have
10 real contest for tilo noEniEfa-
hone''
ssNo.s
''Did you tell 1lr. MeHon at tI1e
HayfibWer nesting that y0u IN
ended to- run for the Ssnare?v
Eyes. i had my platform III my
socket and told them substantially
khafs my platforIa would bs,.
'sDid you meet Andrew w. Mel
ON outside OF going casually down
b the Treaaueyg
.sNo.n said Ware. 'sI was never
n his house and never met him ex
Iept In some departmental matter
He isn't. active in politics.
"WeII ~ seemed to be in Thu
ssYes. ne made his first speech.
Reed asked Ware wheslaer tlleF'
kadnet been sssorne disaff ffectfons'
tmong ward committeeman 4
Phlladelphia-a break" In the
Vara machine. It nettled Ware.
'sI don't thinks so,'' Ware sad
eharply. II got 340,0 600 votes II
PhiladelpI1ia, while Pepper got 100,
500 and Pinchot. 10000. VIII
Almost every newspaper against M
md nearly all Of them for Pepper
I think the Organization functions'
perfectly"
did you make note on tn
Metropolitan Trust Company oI
Nav 11?'' La FFoITette asked.
al indorsed note for Albert %
Greenfield on that bank" sal
Ware.
"How much was that note for?
81 can't say because I must b
sure" Ware replied.
"You signed note and can't ste
US how much It Was2" La Follett
demanded. What was the not
made for?"
"Mr. Greenfield wanted to max
an additional contribution and b
was an. officer in the tanlk--its vie
president, / tilink-aT14 ! indorse
his note. It was for 100000.
think"
''He made that contribution q
100000 then to your carnpaig
Eund?"
'.Ifs made it as d contribution I
the Ware Beidieman-J -James-WoOdwar
campaign"
"Did you discuss this note wit
Frank Fl. Tuft, president OF til
trust coTnpany?''
81 did not"
yaro Mixed On Note
ibid you indorse any othe
hatsa?'
sYas. one for my brother,in-lav
George u. Groves"
''Qn what bank?s
'E1e can probably tell
"You say these two were IL
Dnly two notes you indorsed?''
'iPo4sEfveIy."
Asked what had happened to Il
RIO 900 note, Ware said his bEot
er.in.law had cashed It.
"Part oe Il Is accounted for
my personal expenditures o: 81
700. Ware added.
sWelI, # you used this none
why did your brother-in-law dra
the note1"
ssTTe did not.
"vvhv you just said he did
,,,,,.,an,,t a0o7s Reed calculated.
ssyV1Il. nv brother.in.law took II
aota to the bank" Ware explaine