New Britain herald., 1926-04-26
WELD INTERRUPTS
 HEARING WRANGLE
(Continued from Page l.1

(Continued from Page 1D
 Tho inspector said the plan nov on fllc Is in hls opinion a one-family house and that the corporation counsel Is of the same opinion,
 Today's meeting was called at the | suggestion of Corporation Counsel | Kirkham, Mr. Hennessy said. Mayor | Weld and counsel for the property | owner and the remonstrants were in- vited,
 Building Inspector Honnossy cx- plained the object of the meeting was to be get-togciher for the purpose of reaching an adjustment under which work could proceed on
 the Naples house.
 Architect Earle K. Bishop said
 the main bone of contention was an opening in the first floor leading 10 2 the second floor He said this has been remedied.
 1 Architect D. K. Perry Perry said , there is no law. written or unwrt-
 ten, to govern the location of rooms. He said the fact ono room is direct y over tEe other does not give rise , to good objection.
 f He said the house was originally
 q two family plan and was made Y over at the least possible cost. there- fore only such changes as were nee C essary were made.
 i, Attorney Donald Gaffney who CT Iappearcd for remonstrantS, said
 thero Is already the evidence of TWO builders who say the house is one !, of two families. He said in the ab- <, sonce of law on the case the facts II must rule.
 g Judgo w. r. Mangan, appearing o for Miss Naples, said there is no al
 formative but to change the hous. T to conform with the building con- V, missions ideas, If work is 10 pro. {, ccod.
 ,s MT. Perry asked that the spcci. Y. nc objections be made known anG n taken up.
 ,- The fact that an enclosed stair F. way leads 10 the second floor Wal DC mentioned. Mr. Perry said this plal ,n is frequently followed out in frs In class one family l.ouses. m Forcing Miss Naples to put tn ,o staircase in her living room is no
 consistent with good planning an'
 is asking more than the commission h. has a right to, Mir. Perry said. "a William Allen, builder, pointe o. out various details which he sai ks would permit, wis slight changes m of converting the house into one fo nc use by more than one family.The re pn moval of caps on plumbing woul s- furnish connections to make pos
 sible second kitchen. hc point" IT.. out. The chimney iluos are so place II. as to lend themselves to such in change also. it was explained. on Copies of the plan with change
 made al tho suggestion Of the r
 monstrants, woro passed amor nd members Of the commission fc ch study. The changes were made viii ish. out implying an admission hy Il lb. Naples interest that the place is II an now within the laT.
 1
 close the stairway as the reno
 strants dcntand.
 In replying to a question asked ) Mir Howley, Inspector Henn"s
 said no plan has been submitted c
 capt the original which was lat '"- marked over.
 Inspector Hennessy said the cor
 mission revoked the permit for vi
 laton of ordinance, not because it
 a two family house.
 '>--~ Mayor Weld asked if it is II 'Ig- necessary to start fresh and edh" els 70 the zoning law. When Inspect lls Heunessy replied aliirmatiN" 1er' Mayor Weld asked if the law dc fnn not set forth in exact detail wh CTS can and cannot be done. The Tn spnctor said such is the case. ioc- Mir. Hawlcy asked Hennessy If [ 'uld plan now on file conforms 10 pre- requirement Of q ono-tamily houS z. H.nncysy replied that it does q ,'ra such is the opinion Of the corpo rom tion counsel He explained that ical requirements Of the law as to oi Neh family houses are met, sur Any mans with an eye in ard. head could tell you it's designed era'i d. two-tami)y house; but ils (
 mantlcl nov and is a one-tan was house." MT, 1Iennessy said. four I've anticipated Il fare-up, vins spoctor Iennessy said, but ''
 after we agree on 6 plan some
 else might kick"
 Deputy Inspector Rutherford s onJ- the zoning low revoked other 0oN dinancos and now Miss Naples m ana submit plan for 6 one-tan ap- house. 1T the plan Is not satisIact mon an appeal can be taken. Then 'oo" board Of adjustment may act. $ or Judge Mangan favored con nd cnco of the parties interested an' e oi an agreement is reached there is l. possibility Of an appeal. mon Undor this understanding 'eck, meeting adjourned. need -------------
 No \ o{sCp Tol.nr1 nI,