New Britain herald., 1926-05-24
NEW YORK, CHICAGO,
 PHILA., DETROIT IS RATING FOR CITIES
(Continued from First Paee)

mark for the first time with S.O4S.- GOO against 2,7O1,705 in 1920. Phil adelphia, crossing the two million mark, retains third place with o. oOS,0Oo against 1,S23,779. Detroit continues fourth with 1,290,O ,O0O against 973,678.
 Ten cities comprise the half mill ion to a million class.
 Ten In Second Class
 Estimates in this class are: Cleveland 960,000 against 756,S41; St. Louis S30,0O0 against 772.S97; Baltimore 808.000 against 73S,S2G; Boston 7S7,000 against 74S,O6O; Pittsburgh 6S7, 1000 against 594.277; Los Angeles, not estimated, had 576,673 in 1920; San Francisco 567,00O against 5OG,676; Buffalo 544,0O0 against 506.775; Washington 52S,0o0 against 437,571 and Will waukee 517,000 against 457147.
 The 100000 Group
 In the 400, 900 class estimates are: Newark 495,000 against 414,524; Minneapolis 434,000 against S80.5S2: New Orleans 410,O00 against 375,. 219; Cincinnati 411.O0O against 4o1,247.
 300,000 Groupings
 The 5Oo,OoO class cities estimates follow:
 Kansas City. Missouri, 37S,oOO against S24,410; Indianapolis 367,0OO against 315,746; Rochester, 321,o00 against 295,750; Jersey City S1S,O00 against 29S.103; Seattle, not estimat- ed, had 315,6S5 in 1920; Louisville 5t1,000 against 234,S91.
 Cities of the 100000 class are:
 Toledo 294,0oO against 243,164; Denver 2S5,O00 against 251.491: Columbus. Ohio. 2S5,0OO against 238,7G2; Providence 275,OO0 against 237,595; Oakland 261.000 against 216,261: Portland. Oregon. not es- timated, had 25S,2SS in 1920; St. Paul 280,000 against 234,6S9; Omaha 215,4o0 against 191.6Ot; Birmingham 211,00 against 17S,- sos; Akron. not estimated, had 20S,- 435 in 1920; San Antonio 205,00O against 161,379; Atlanta, not esti- mated, had 2S3,550 in 1920; Dallas 100000 against 15S,976.
 New Haven 1S2,O00
 Estimates in the 100000 class are: Worcester 192,000 against 179,- 794: Richmond 189,O00 against Ill., 667; Syracuse 184,0O0 against Ill., T17; New Haven 182,000 against 162,5S7; Memphis 177,oOO against 162,351; Dayton 17700o against l52,559; Norfolk 174,00O against 115,777; Youngstown 165,o00 against 132,35S: Hartford 164.000 against 13S,0S6; Ft. Worth 159,O00 against 111.536; Grand Rapids 156,000 against 137,634; Des Moines 146,000 against 126.46S.
 - Springfield. Mass. 145,o00 against 129,614; Bridgeport. not estimated, had 14S,555 in 1920; Scranton 143,- coo against 137,783; Houston, not estimated, had 12S,276 in 1920; Paterson 14S,00O against 1S5,S75; Nashville 1S70o0 against 11S,S42; Flint 137,O00 against 91,599; Tren- ton 1S4.00O against 119,2S0; Salt Lake City 13S,000 against 11S,110; Tulsa 133,000 against 72,075; Fall River 1S1,OOO against 120,4S5; Camden 131,000 against 116,S09; Wilmington. Delaware 124,00O aganist 110,16S; Cambridge, Mass. 122.000 against 109,694; New Bed ford. not estimated had 121,217 in 1920; Albany 119000 against 11S,- 314; Kansas City. Kansas, IF, ,000 against 108.S51 Erie, not estimated, had 9S,372 In 1920; Workers 113,- GOO against 100.176: Reading 11A- 900 against 107.7S4; Duluth 113,- 00o against 9S,917; Lowell. not es- timatcd. had 112,759 in 1920; Can ton 11o.000 against S7.091; San Diego 11o,oo0 against 74,6S3; Spo- kane 109,000 against 104,4S7; Eliz- abeth, not estimated. had 95.7S5 in 1920; Fl Paso 109,000 against IT, 560; Tacoma 106,0 against &C., 965: Lyon 104,000 against 99,14S; Oklahoma City, not estimated, had 103.9SO in 1920: Utica 10S.000 against 94,153: Waterbury, not es- timated, had 91.715 in 1920; Tam pa 1O2,000 against 51.6OS; Cam- bridge 100, 900 against 93,09t.
 Figures for other New England cities of more than 30,000 were:
 Est. for City 1920 1925 1926 Brookline 37,748 42.6S1 43,90O Cambridge 1o9,694 119,G69 122, 900