The Washington times., 1926-08-07

him who WI was, vet Van. accord
Ing to police theory" was given,
Wu's card to present to the bank
and was supposed to impersonate
him. Also WI and / were supposed
to send for Van to help usl Further.
more. there didn't seem to be any
definite unde. standing about the.
division Of the money. was to
take It all back to WI, who would
give me some OF 1t.
Nothing Is said about giving any
to Van, yet he was to run the great
risk OF being apprehended at the
bank. Was there ever such q weak
plot or such stupid criminals2 And
all this amateurishness was sup
posed to be combined with the most
expert gunmanship OF an evidently
experienced criminal
IL i had really been implicated as
told In the confession" would not
Van and have at once planned to
get under cover for a Few days until
we could find out just who was be-
ing charged with the murders and
who was under suspicion? IL we.
had been even implicated in the
slightest degr-e, would the detec-
tives have found us at home when
they called at 313 West 112th ST.,
New York City, that Saturday morn
ing? I am sure not!
Questions 2l2-220 Inclusive
Yes. I borrowed some MONEY from Mr.:
WI, first time $50: second time. sac.
- - rHs
gave me the cheek for $50 on 27th. !
think. After Mr.. Hsis and Or. Wong
were killed. don't believe took any
money from their pockets. don't
know about It. lMr. WI taking some.l
Let me see. think he took some
money, because when he came DOWN
stairs he had some money and he hand
II 10 mel think about $40 or S12, He
wants me to 50 to the bank and call
that money ,Os No. when shot M. WI
did not take anything from his
This section deals with . few
more loose ends that the detectives
evidently want fixed so as TO sup
port their theories" The actual
facts, however, are as follows: WI
Washington for me to loan to q
mutual friend. (Thfs friend had
wanted to borrow from me, but !
had told him then had none to
loan. but that ! would borrow It for
him. This was the $50 from WI to-
mel WI. however, owed me some
money for things from China which
I had sent home for. When ] arr
rived in Washington, we balanced
our accounts and 1t left him owing
me $40, which he paid by check,
and which the Government. In my
trials has insisted upon calling
another loan from WI to me.
The 10 or 10 dollars in the
story as being given to me BY WI
for taxi Is q fabrication like much
Of the rest. but an apparently mean
ingless ont. as 1t supports no known
theory.
So ends this infamous 'confes-
sion obviously untrue-and obYi-
ousIy fabricated to support certain
theories.l / have never myself
realized how incredible It was until
so much new evidence came t.
light during the third trial-eyi-
dence. however, which must have
been known to the authorities from
the beginning.
The greatest proof OF it's falsity
in my opinion, however, Is the fact
that the District Attorney himself
abandoned the theories contained
therein. and in both the second and
third trials attempted to convict me
the murderer Of all three men.
He pictured me as coming to the
mission, and without conceaIing my
hat. coat or muffler. or evading
the ring of the door-beIl, finally
hiding myself in the basement.
Then. by mental processes sur
passing those of the detectives. he
had me inveigle the three members
of the mission. one by one, to the
basement. and had me kill them ALL!
The ononin~ ny.onfnra ~ saTsy,n