The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1925-09-26

SSHheShSS ~ TIC rAChSH OOSAdhot
Party, that it itself will find the cor
rect solution to this question"
THIS gem of an Opposition" de-
4 claration bears "three sianat-
ures': Otto Bauer (Austria), Dan
RUSSIAN Menshevik) and Czech Ger
man Social-Democrat in Czecho-Slo-
vakia).
Bauer, the man who in 1919 as Aus
trian foreign minister supported the
suppression of the Hungarian revo-
luton and the Polish white army
against Soviet Russia by supplying
arms, and who was removed from
power at the behest Of the French
because he secretly intrigued with
the Italian government to re-estab-
lish the Triple Alliance-Italy-Ger
many-Austria. Dan, with hrs clique, is
the individual who for years has been
fostering every agitation against
Soviet Russia, but who advocates
peaceful" Intervention only; and
Czech, a German nationalist, a faith
full reflex of the Czech government
socialists.
The declaration" itself is price
less. in embryo all problems of the
world war, and full confidence" in
the French Socialist Party, hence "at
the moment refrain from a discus
sion" Apparently, these three heroes
! wish to say that they are not quite
contented with the official attitude of
the French party, but bank on vic
tory within the party of the semi
pacifist tendencies, which are fairly
we'll represented in it, but are in fact
absolutely helpless against the actual
support of the war on the part of the
party leaders. OF course, no one
thought of securing the support of the
increasing number of socialist work
ers who are joining the anti-war cam
paign of the Communists.
EvEN Het Volk, the organ of the
II Dutch Social Democrats. is very
disconnected with the attitude of the
London Bureau, both majority and
minority. The success within the
ranks of the workers under the lead
ership of the Communists in the strug-
gle against war, disquiets the obser-
vers from Amsterdam; especially the
demonstration on the workers day
that was celebrated in Paris July 4th
and 5th. why do the Socialists let
the Communists have such demonstra-
tions, those workers will ask who
make difference between both par
ties? The majority will probably be
Indifferent as to who originated the
movement, they accept the leader
ship of the Communists since the So
cialists do not take part in the move
ment" (Het Volk", July 18th, 1926.
Yes, indeed why do the Socialists
"leaye" the struggle against the war
to the Communists? Simply because
section of the Socialist leaders. the
| avowed colonialists, carry on the
struggle for war to victory, and
another section, the pacifists of differ
ent shades are fighting for a war for
peace; because all do not wish to
desert their threatened fatherland in
the hour of danger.
TN the statutes Of the International
L Working Union Of Socialist Parties
we read: mot only an instrument in
peace, but it is an indispensable in.
strument in times of war"
The Spanish delegation is absent. ;.
all problems in embryo :. i. full con
China: The discussion on these
mighty revolutionary events ensued al
the London session of the Bureau OF
the Second international by dealing
with an invitation of the Communist
International and of the r. l. L. U. to
organize common action in favor OF
the Chinese revolution. The Bureau
proceeded straight after dealing with
this document to the ordinary agen-
da In special decision it records
| tl.ok I,o,.o T. onAkho- ffoutknI f~o~t