The producers news. [volume] (Plentywood, Mont.) 1918-1937, 1925-08-28
NEXT WEEK:
WHERE FIRST TO
FORTIFY FOR HEALTH

absurdedly inadequate.
Herbert Spencer, himself a believer
in evolution Acknowledged: NO sclen-
fist of repute ever claimed that cvolu-
ton is science. 1t is only an unproven
hypothesis.
man evolutlonist, said before he died
in 1919: Most modern Investigators OF
science have come TO the conclusion
that the doctrine Of evolution, and par
ticularly DarWiniSm, is an error, ana
cannot he maintained.
Professor Beal, of Kings College,
London, says: In support of all natur-
alistic conjectureS concerning mans
origin. there is not at this time a shad-
ow OF scientific evidence.
Prof. Drummond, profeSsed CHRISTIAN
and professed evolutionist, said in his
last days 1 am going away back to
the Book to believe it and receive 1t,
as I did at the first 1 can no longer
live on uncertainties.
Professor Virchow of Berlin recount
ed the foremost physician on the globe,
said: It is all nonsense. 1t cannot pe
proven by science that man descended
/ from the ape OF any other animal. since
! the announcement of the theory, all real
scientific knowledge has proceeded in
/ the opposite direction.
/ Professor Fleischmann, Erlangen,
Germany BIOLOGIST, says: The Darwin
/ ian theory of descent has in the realm
i of nature not single fact to sustain
I il, or confirm it. 1t is not the result
/ OF SclenCl1c research, put purely the
product Of the imagination.
/ Sir Charles Bell, University College
] London, says Everything declares the
species to have their origin in a dis
tinct creation.
DR.. D. S. Gregory, managing editor of
the Standard Dictionary, says: 1t is
strange fact that no great scientific
authority in Great Britain, in exact sci
ence, science that reduces its cOnclu-
sions to mathematical formulas has en-
dOrSed Evolution.
Darwin himself, toward the end of his
/ life, said to Lady Hope: I was a young
man with uniformed ideas I threw out
queries, and suggestions, wondering all
/ the time over everything, and to my
establishment the ideas took like wild
/ fire. People made a religion of them.
| (In his Origin of Life, or specieS). He
used the phrase, We may suppose, Eight
/ Hundred times. His reasoning may do
very we'll for a man that has no more
sense than to believe that three is. one,
and one is three, but it would never do
for others).
] The proof given in favor of an intel
ligent Creator at the Scopes trial was
so convincing that all Mr.. Mencken
could do was to vent his spite on poor
old Bryan. But any newswriter that
values his reputation and character
should refrain from personal abuse and
personalities; for failure to observe
common courtesy and newspaper ethics
will eytnaually cause such a one to be
retired to obscurity where they belong.
When personal abuse takes precedence
over the principle involved it is safe to
say that the one so doing is defeated,
or has no further grounds for conten-
ton on his side of the question on de-
bate, and the intelligent reading public
will very early recognize his defeat.
Such is the case in the critics attack on
Mr.. Bryan.
The article written by Mencken had
a wide circulation. was read far and
near, and in justice to all Christians
and the cause which I represent ask
you to be on the square, see that this
article has the same publicity as the
one which demands an answer. I trust
you will see that it will be inserted
word for word as the writer intended it,
to be that its meaning not be miscon-
strued And I will thank you very
kindly.
Very truly yours.
w. A. WHEELER.
Box 1856. Froid Mont