New Britain herald., 1925-03-10
APPEAL FILED ON
 HART ST. DISPUTE
Property Owners Take Their
 Fight Into City Court
OPPOSE INFORMALLY HOUSES
Dissatisfied With Permits Granted
 by Building Board to Anthony Naples and Anna Lee-Protcst
 Filed on Amherst Street Structure

Charles E. Parsons and B. A.. Hawley who, as representatives of number of Hart street property owners, have filed a request for a hearing before the common council in the matter of permits issued to Anthony Naples and Anna Lee for two family houses on Hart street. have taken the matter into the city court on an appeal from the build ing commissions action.
 Papers of appeal have been drawn by Attorney Donald Gaffney and were served on Town Clerk Alfred l.. Thompson by Constable Fred Wrinkle. The appeal will be heard in city court on the fifth Monday of March.
 The appeal reads as follows
 "On the 17th day of November, 1924. Anthony Naples of New Brit ain made an application for a per- init to the building inspector of the city of New Britain, to build a two- family house at 260 Hart street.
 "On the day of December, 1924 the building commission of the City of New Britain refused to grant said application.
 For divers and sundry causes and reasons, the building commission re- signed and a new commission was appointed by the Mayor of the City of New Britain.
 Said newly created building com- mission on the 25th day of February 1925, after hearing, voted to grant said application.
 "On the 23rd day of January, 1925, Mrs. Anna Lee made application to the newly created building commits sion to build a two family house at No. 265 Hart street.
 "On the 2bth day Of February, 1925, the building commission of the city of New Britain voted to grant said application.
 Your petitions own and reside in
 Your petitioners own and reside in type within five hundred feet of said land of Mrs. Anna Lee and Anthony Naples.
 By the action of the building commission of the City of New Brit ain in voting to grant said applica- tioEs your petitioners are seriously aggrieved.
 Wherefore, by virtue of the premises, your petitioners bring this, their appeal, from said granting of the permit by the building commits sion of the City of New Britain, and prays that said court set aside the granting of the permit by the build ing commission"
 Ten property owners In the vicin- ity of Amherst street have filed protest against continuance of work on building being erected by James Carlin on that street. Cariin took a permit for two car garage at a cost of s350. After reports had been received at the building inspec- tors office, an inspection was made and city officials declared the struc- ture has every appearance of dwelling house, with few signs of intent to use it for garage purposes. Carlin claims it is a garage. His neighbors say it is a dwelling and in violation of his permit rights and the restrictions contained in the deed through which he acquired the lot on which it stands.
 Their protest, which will be read at the next session of the common council follows:-
 I've, the undersigned property owners of Amherst street and vicin- ity hereby protest to your honorable body. whereas James A. Carlin ob- tained permit to erect a two car garage on Amherst street and Is now erecting a dwelling house which is violation of his permit, and which we consider is a detriment to the surrounding property. The deed for this property restricts the own CTS from erecting a dwelling house at cost of less than $S,000, where as the cost Of the above dwelling will not exceed $1,0OO.