The daily worker. [volume] (Chicago, Ill.) 1924-1958, 1925-02-21
BY MAX eEpAcHr.

of the enlarged executive commit
tee Of the Comintern, Comrade
zinoviev warns against the danger
that some organizational principles
of Bolshevism will be regarded as the
whole of Bolshevism. He points out
that after the reorganization of the
party on the basis of shop nuclei,
the problem will be how to fill the
nuclei with life.
This life must spring out of the
general Bolshevist Orientation of the
party; it must be applied Bolshevism.
Every manifestation of life Of the
party, must be Bolshevist, conception,
orientation, action.
THE recent discussion in our Inter-
/ national against Trotzkyism was
a phase in the process of the Boil
shevization of the International The
scope of the discussion silenced even
the most consistent non Bolshevist
tendencies within the various Com
munist Parties. The role of the
party in the proletarian struggle for
emancipation, and the relation Of the
revolutionary proletariat to the peas
ants were in the center Of the dis
cussion. Thus two most important
Bolshevist principles were given in
tensive consideration; not abstractly
but concretely in connection with the
Russian revolution and thus with the
world revolution. The fight on both
of these questions supply theoretical
rallying points Of non-Bolshevist ele-
ments. But the anti.Trotsky discus
sion in the International has streng-
thened Communist understanding and
has solidified the theoretical basis
upon which Bolshevist party must
be built.
n MOTHER important development
n contributes to the Bolshevization
of the Communist Parties. The con-
solidation of international reaction be-
hind the Dawes plan facilitates the
understanding of the imperialist era
OF today. It shows capitalism at the
height of International organization
and, at the same time, it reveals its
inner disintegration. 1t demonstrates
al QCOtuS tlA0J TIC Oh VI llupCl4G1-
ism puts the proletarian revolution
up as the order of the day. It proves
that its resent IS unbearable, and
that it's future holds only two alter
nstives-its victory or its defeats. It's
victory means a twentieth century
barbarism intensified by modern tech
mic and science. Its defeat means a
proletarian victory and revolution
airy transformation of capitalism into
communism. The tasks Of the pro-
letarian struggle become clearer every
day and block the opponents of Boil
the revolutionary perspective with an
opportunist film of inaction and re-
formist sectarianism.
n LTHOUGH Bolshevization is much
n more than merely reorganization,
yet the problem of reorganization of
our party the Workers (Communist)
Party, presents most important
phase in its Bolshevization. If we
approach this from the correct angle
there will be little danger that we
fall into the mistake of overestimating
it's Importance.
In our party, the Workers Com
munist) Party, the reorganization is of
the utmost Importance. In Germany,
or any Of the European countries,
where the political problems of the
Communist parties present them
selves in form of direct revolutionary
problems, the reorganization becomes
more naturally the adaptation of or.
ganizational forms to the revolution
airy functions Of the party. In the
United States, this is not SO simple.
OF course the functions Of our party
are not of less revolutionary import
ance than those of the German party;
nor is the shop nuclei form Of organ
ization Of less Importance to our par
ty Just because II is further removed
from a revolutionary climax Of the
oIorc .4~.Urla thar AAa4 nn~wnaAxx