Baraboo weekly news. [volume] (Baraboo, Wis.) 1912-197?, 1924-10-16
CASES HEARD
CIRCUIT COURT

turned VefQlct Oh 9IUo.Oo. MT
Meier was employed on the Bias
sett farm for about five and a
half months and in the final set
Element brought suit for 1856 in
wages.
Witnesses: John Meier, William
Lochmer, John Meier, Sr., H. l..
Halsted, A. K. Bassett, and EN-
ma Bassett.
The jury: Minnie Mather, H. o.
Warren, John w. Liegel, John
Blau, Julia Scallon, Perry Cob
leigh, Charles Bowl, Mrs. Lou
Baringer, ]. C. Bum, Albert Rath-
man, Henry Goetz. and William
Schulenberg.
Other Cases
Judgment of foreclosure was
grantee. il the case of the State
Bank of Spring Green vs.. John
Rutland.
A mortgage on real estate own
ed by Herman Unke was ordered
discharged.
There was a judgment of fore
closure in the case of r. Law
renee Joiner ano Others against
Cornelius Vandeveer.
BEFORE the Court
The case Of Kenneth Weidman
against Ray Koch and others is
now before the court. This is the
last jury case.
Kenneth Weidman was employ
ed at the Koch garage in Ableman
and there was a difference when
an attempt was made to reach a
final settlement. He sued for
$533.34 and was awarded $533.33-
one cent less-by the jury. Koch
Brothers were allowed $7199. An
abridgement of the special verdict
follows:
Question /. Did the defendants
prior to the first day of February
1928, agree to pay the plaintiff
$4,000 per month for his services
in the garage?
Answer, Yes.
2. Did the plaintiff commence
work for the defendants under the
provisions of this agreement on
February 1, 1923?
Answer, Yes.
3. How long did the plaintiff
work for the defendants under
such agreement?
Answer, II 1-3 months.
4. Was it agreed between the,
plaintiff and defendants in the
contracts of employment made
herein that Kenneth Weidman
was to pay out of his wages one
half of the Weidman Brothers CO.
partnership bill?
Answer, Yes.
5. Did the plaintiff on the 18th
day of February, 1924, agree to
accept the $35.54 with the under
standing that $4,000 was to be
held back in case the brothers
share of the partnership account
due was not paid, as a full and
complete final settlement of the
account between the plaintiff and
the defendant?
Answer, No.
6. If the court is of the opinion
that the plaintiff in this case is
entitled to recover, at what SUM
do you place his damages?
Answer, $533.33.
z. If the court is of the opinion
that the defendants in this case
Is entitled to recover, at what
sum do you assess their dam
ages?
Answer, $71.99.
Witnesses: Kenneth Weidman,
Henry Weidman, Walter Zarske,
Ray Koch, Roy Koch, Esther Weld
man, Aaron Moeley, Norman
Quale, Maud Battles, H. Groto-
phorst and H. M. LANCER.
The jury: William Kinney, Hen
ry Ferber, Mrs Henry Foss, Theo.
dore Marquardt, Mary Sullivan H.
K. Dillenbeck, Fred Oil, C. H.
Evenson, Mrs. c.. A. Clark, Mrs.
Spencer Smith, Joseph Weise. and
f. j. HoltZ.
Other Cases
In the case of Theresa Dryer VS..
Arthur T. Bell and others an or
der was granted to issue execution
on judgment against Mr.. Bell, al
though the same was over five
years old.
Judgment was granted in the
partition action of Lydia Cole VS..
Ida Rotzoll and others.
(From Fridays Daily
Three Reedsburg moonshiners,
Peter Duren, Dennis Glossy and
Art Zobel, who had been found
guilty of violating the prohibition
act, were sentenced by Judge
Crosby when circuit court opened
this morning.