Baraboo weekly news. [volume] (Baraboo, Wis.) 1912-197?, 1924-03-27

Carl Kluender and T, NJ Mould were
the witnesses and Frank B. Moss was
named the receiver. Besides Mr.. st.
Gohn, Prairie du Sac, the other de-
PENDANTS are William st. John, Mrs.
William ST. John, Curtis St. John,
Mrs. Curtis ST. John, James st. John,
Lenora Morris. Sephromia Young.
Ruth Purdy, Ethel Woodbury., Alice
Runnels, John Guethlein, Thomas
Smith and Walter Farris.
Fuller-Ringing Case
In the case of r. L. Fuller VS.. Mrs.
Eliza Ringing the plaintiff desires
a new trial on part of the questions
, involved Oral argum ents were made
by the attorneys and the matter was
taken under adyisement.
Verdict n School Case
In the case of John Moungey
against School District No. 8, town of
Fairfield, the defendant moved for a
judgment ON the verdict This was
granted The verdict means that Mr.
Moungey does not get pay for trans
porting his children to and from
school and must pay the district for
their attendance, all because it was
shown he was not resident of the
district-he was resident of Gale
t,donia at the time
Briefs are to be filed in the case
of Frank Rubensaal against John
Swafford.
F.; Herman Gall resided on land own
, ed by F. c. E. Welk and Mr.. Welk
| claimed that the PROPERTY was sold
| in which he did not share in the re
turns. The amount was estimated to
be $500 and Mr.. Gall signed a note
! for the above amount Afterwards Mr..
/ Gall claimed he was threatened in
! order OF make him sign, he later
refused to pay. According to the spe-
cial verdict Mr.. Welk won the suit.
The questions and answers are as
! follows:
l. Did the plaintig on the 9th day
! of January, 1923, by means of fraudu-
! lent representation, duress and
! threats procure the execution of the
vote in question Exhibit A
| Answer No
| q Was it agreed between the plain
| tiff and the defendant at the Office Of
| Mr.. Meier OF the 9th day Of jan
uary, 1923, that the defendant owed
the plaintiff the sum of 5000 as a
final and complete settlement be-
tween the parties?
Answer, Yes.
g. What sum of money was due
the plaintiff by the defendant, If any,
on the 9th day of January, 1923.
Answer, $500.
Witnesses: F. C. E. Welk, Herman
Gall, Carl Gall Jr., Mrs. Ella Gall
Jury: Mrs E. NJ Adams, Mrs L.
w. Sayles, Ernest Marks, Clara Mer-
KEEL, F. w, Gade, N. H. Gerber, Aug.
Horstman, A. E, Won Valid, Mrs.
Helen Potter, Perry Schults, Mar
garet Coyne, Mrs Ida Neitzel
Judgments were taken on the YER
diets rendered in the cases of Titus
VS. Allen and Fey VS.. Rumley com
pany.
Title was cleared in the case :"
Mable Filhauer VS. Smith Freeman and
also in the case of A. w Schroeder
and others VS.. Alena Johnson and
others
The Automobile Case
Previously it was stated that Mrs.
w, H Sherman was paid $4,000 for
injuries received while walking on
the Warner Memorial road and an adj
ditional paragraph may be interesting
ito all who walk on the highways and
Who drive cars. Mrs. Sherman asked
for $4,000 in the first place and
later this was raised to $4,000. Be
fore the trial came on offers. of settle
ment were made and no agreement
vas reached until the last hour The
insurance company desired to fight
the case because they believed that
Mrs. Sherman was negligent in walk
ing on the highway when there was so
many cars On the other hand,
Adolph Fey of Ableman, the driver
Of the car, desired to avoid suit. It
was finally agreed that the insurance
company would pay s4,250 and costs
while Mr. Fay concluded he would
pay $3.50, making total of $4,000 to
be paid to Mrs Sherman.
All realize that both cars and ped
estrians have right on the road but