San Antonio light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1911-1993, 1924-04-03
COURT PROCEEDINGS
In Supreme Court .

Austin. Tex, April .3.-The following
proceedings were had in the supreme
court Wednesday:
Judgment heretofore entered herein is
set aside on motion for rehearing and
judgment of court of civil appeals re-
versing and remanding is affirmed:
Cause withdrawn from commission OF
appeals: L. H. Marshburn ct al. VS..
Sidney Stewart ct al, Tyler.
Applications for writs of error grant
ed: Guaranty State Bank VS.. Louise
Ball Shirley. Tarrant THIS cause is ad-
vanced and set for submission in SUI
man. Comptroller. ct al, VS.. Guaranty
State Bank, ct al, Johnson: Marietta
state Bank VS.. A. B. Galloway ct al"
Morris: C. X. Gilmore VS.. Lumbermen,s
can Refining Company VS.. $. J.. sta
pies. Secretary State, ct al. Travis;
W. NJ. Massie VS.. Rachel L. Hutchinson
ct al. Floyd.
Applications dismissed for want of
Jurisdiction: Mrs. Mamie A. White VS..
l.. C. White ct al, Fannin; the City or
Henderson vs. Miss Dotie Fields. Rusk;
G. w. Thomson VS.. W. II. Murchison.
Haskell; Elsie NJ. Page ct al VS.: Kath-
crime H. Barnes ct al, Falls; ]. l.. Lam
caster ct al. Receivers. VS.. c. X. John
son. Terry; st. Louis Commission Com
pany vs. Ed Slotnick. Victoria: National
Protective Legion. vs.. p. l.. Stevens ct
ux. Bexar: II. p. Lawrence VS.. B. J..
Lang Jr., Bexar; Melton Guerra ct al.
VS. Eusebio Garcia. Webb.
Former judgment corrected so as TO
render judgment against the sureties on
the supersedeas bond: City National
Bank of Corpus Christi VS.. Nellie NJ.
| Craig ct al. Nueces.
Motions for rehearing OF causes over
ruled: F. II. Barfield ct al. VS.. w. {.
Belcher Land Mtg. Company Jones;
ct al. Eastland.
Motions for rehearing of applications
| overruled:f W. T. StriclSel VS.. Brown
field State Bank ct al, Terry: Frederick
| Wis.
Motions for rehearing submitted: w.
s. Terry ct al. VS.. Matte Spearman, Ma
rion; Santa Rosa Infirmary ct al. vs.
NJ. n. Clement VS., First National Bank
-, Of Paris. Tex. Lamar; southern Trad
| ing Company Of Texas VS.. NJ. Feldman
| Motion to advance granted: Mrs. os-
ceola E. Tod ct al. VS.. City OF Hous-
Cause Withdrawn from commission ot
appeals and set for May u: N. ElesnS'
I Breckenridge ct al vs. Isabella II. hoo-
erts ct al, Bexar. 90,
| Cause advanced and set for May rs
\ W. L. Thompson VS.. r. s. Schmitt ct al,
] Harris Certified question:.
Cause Withdrawn from commission ano
| set in supreme court for june 4: 4. y
, Barnhill VS.. The State of Texas, Hous
| ton (Cureton, chief justice. not sittlngl
Causes submitted: l.. p. Cassell e.
| al. VS.. United States Fidelity and Guar
anty Company. Wichita; Nj. X. Reamei
| ct al. VS. l.. ]. Polk ct al Chabeas cor,
pus); W. A. Dobbins, Tax Collector. e
al. VS.. Limestone County ct al, Lime
stone tenth certified question. r. NJ
Hubbard ct al. VS.. Hamilton County
Hamilton. certified question.
The following cases were decided Weu
nesday by the supreme courIon report
Of the commission of appeals; Caus.
dismissed on agreement of parties:
R. Bryan vs.. Ruby Bryan johnson e
al, Hill.
| Judgments reversed and cause remand
ed: Lille Harris ct al. VS.. Mollie May
field ct al. Harrison: II. Fronhoff VS.
b. Fronhoff. Bowie; Farmers Mil an.
Elevator Company vs. c. ID. Hodges, car
son; James L. Bell VS.. James A. Baker
Receiver. webb. 50,
Judgment Of court OF civil appeal
reversed and judgment OF district cour
reformed and affirmed: a. II. Kirby, ne
celver, Tvs. Dilworth and Marshall. Tar
rant. ,
Judgment Of court OF civil appeals al
. firmed; John NJ. Miller ct Tx VS.. E. A
Hodges ct al, Palo Pinto.