Belington progressive. [volume] (Belington, W. Va.) 1912-1927, 1924-10-02
PEOPLE WOULD PAY
If RAILROADS WERE
GOVERNMENT OWNED
Third Party Plan Would
Take Revenue From
States Involved.

4
taxes now paid by the railroads would
have to be paid by the people, accord
ing to VIII r. Wood, member of con-
gress from Indiana and chairman Of
the Republican National COMPRESSION
al committee. Mr.. Wood has made
a careful analysis of the situation.
noting the tax payments by the rail-
roads to the several state governments
last year.
If the roads were owned by the
| government they would be tax free
| just as the post offices now are. The
states would still need the money,
just as they do now, and as result
additional taxes would have to be lev
| led on the citizens.
/ Mr.. Woods complete analysis fol-
/ lows
Robert M. LaFoIlette, the Social
1st-third party candidate for Presi-
dent, Is trying to convince 100000
] farmers that the surest cure for their
ills is to bring about government own
ership of all the railroads in the cOun-
try; that, If this is done, transporta-
! tAod iolCo VI Minus WOuIu Dc I'LL
mediately reduced
There are a lot of things, however,
that would transpire Ii this scheme
were carried out, that Senator LaFol-
lette Is woefully silent upon He is
not telling the farmers that the gov
eminent pays no taxes on it's proper
ties and that it would pay no taxes
/ ON fhla roll As nf No t.
owned them. He Is not telling them
that the railroads are paying into the
various county and state treasures of
the United States more than $300,0OO.-
600 annually, which sum would have
| to be paid, in large part, by the farm
ers, once the government began the
ownership Of the railroads
Take the state of Wisconsin for In
stance: Last year the railroads paid
the state of Wisconsin 1891, 976 in
taxes. In the state of Minnesota the
railroads paid, last year, total tax
to the state of $S,425, 1882. In Iowa they
paid $6,S49, 703 in Kansas, $6,739, 346;
in Indiana, $13,094,627. In these five
states alone the railroads paid $42,-
] 431,634 of the public tax burden. |
have taken the figures in the above
named. states because they are large
/ ly agricultural and in the event that
| the government became the owner of
the railroads Of the country the farm
ers of these states would have to bear
the greatest part of the burden in pay
ing these additional taxes. -.
"In the state of Iowa IL the LaFolr
lette scheme were carried out, 1t would
/ mean an increase of $32 in taxes an
nually levied against each farm in the
/ state or $3.50 for eack man, woman
| and child in the state. In Kansas the
burden would be $40 against each farm
| or $3.50 for each resident Of that state.
In Minnesota. where Mr.. LaFollette Is
making strong appeal for votes, he
would take away from the farmer.
under the government ownership plan.
tax Income now paid by the rail
roads and place 1t as an additional as
sessment of SAT against each farm in
the state, or $3.50 against each person
residing in that commonwealth.
II am told that, In one county in
Montana, the total tax paid by the rail-
roads amounts to 1881 per cent of the
entire levy. In midsummer of this
year there was $104,102 Of the total
tax assessed In that county delinquent,
upon which penalty had been laid.
This Is convincing evidence that this
county was already taxed much more
than it was able to pay Yet Mr.. La
Toilette would take away 1914 per
/ cent of the tax revenue of this coun-
! ty, now being paid by the railroads,
and place it as an additional burden
upon the Individual taxpayer
''In my own state Of Indiana, the
railroads pay $13,094,627 in taxes an
/ nually. The total tax Of the state is
/ $124,866, 100. The railroads share of
this tax is over 10 per cent. If Mr..
LaFollettes scheme were put into eff
feet, the individual taxpayer of Indi-
ana would have to pay this additional
sum Of $18.O04.627 each year. In Mari
on county the railroads pay annually
| $7I5,388 In taxes, very substantial
item in the total of the taxes paid in
that county.
"The figures that have given, ap-
plicable to the Ave agricultural states
named, differ only in degree from those
that might be given for every other
state in the Union.
"Not only would the farmers be bur-
dened by the payment Of these ad-
ditional taxes should the government
become the owners Of the railroads,
but they would also have On additional
burden to bear. the size Of which II
il hard to ASCERTAIN. In the shape Of
deficits occurring In the operation Of
the railroads Of the country for main
tenance. extensions and upkeep.
Some idea Of what this burden would
be, may be had. however. by recalling
| the experience during the period
| Of government operation Of the rail-