Evening star., 1924-08-11

anu ms attitude towards his family.
Lack of awe and reverence is true
of all atheists isn't it, asked MT
Grove. If there is no belief in GOD
and the hereafter you don't expect
them to show awe and reverence?
Wouldn't you expect ridlcuIe"'
"Ridicule is childish" replied the
witness.
Alteration for Mother.
In further describing conditions
upon which he had based his theory
that Leopold was not advanced be-
yond IL years in emotional age, Dr..
Hubert said:
He had childlike, uncritical
alteration of his mother, and then,
his aunt, who assumed the mothers
place in the household upon her
death, and a childish attitude towards
his father as a person too distant to
be regarded as a confidant, but whose
wishes were law in the household.
He never made pal of his father or
older brothers"
do you regard it as childish for
a boy to have an uncritical love for
his mother" asked Mr.. Grove.
Il did not mean that" said DR.. Hull
bert. When she was alive he had
a childish attitude towards her. He
confused the picture of the madonna
with his mother"
Questioned on Letter.
Mr.. Grove questioned the doctor
about a letter written to Loeb two
years ago by his former nurse, and
sought his opinion as to whether the
nurse was addressing Loeb as one
emotionally matured. The croSs-ex-
animation became an argument, in
terspersed with defense objections
and rulings by Judge Caveriy, and
but little ground was covered.
The croSs-examination then turned
to discussion of Loebs sex life and
Judge Caverly ruled that If the mat
ter was gone into it must be done
quietly. The subject was dropped
after DR.. Hubert said he regarded his
11-page discussion of the matter in
his report as brief.
During the 15-minute period when
Mr.. Grove and DR.. Hubert spared
over questions and answers as to
Loeb's emotions and life, that de-
fendant hung over Leopold's shoulder
and the two whispered and smiled.
Difference Between Bushes.
More than five minutes was taken
up with trying to ascertain the diff
cheek and a similar glow on that of
Leopold.
will you point out one physical de-
feet in either defendant which ac-
counts for this crime" asked Mr..
Grove.
mo, SIR responded DR.. Hubert.
What is the function of the pinea1
gland?" asked the prosecutor.
1T regulates the balance of other
endocrine glands" said the witness.
"Is that all?" pursued the prose-
cutor.
THAT is enough: TIL stand on that"
replied the witness.
How do you know what ago the
pineal gland should calcify?" was the
next question.
by statements Of other eminent au-
thore," was the response.
Left In Abeyance.
Then ensued a long wrangle over
whether the witness could state specii-
cally at what age the pineal gland
should have calcified in either Of the de-
PENDANTS. The matter finally was left in
abeyance.
rs it not a fact that medical men
know practically nothing Of the func-
ton OF the pinea gland?" asked Mr..
Grove.
Some Of them, yes," said DR.. Hubert,
But. as q group is that not true?''
urged the States attorney.
NO." was the response
Isn't it fact that there is some
question that the pineal is a gland at
all?" asked Mr.. Grove.
Yes, in some peoples minds~ re-
piled the witness.
"Mr. Grove asked the doctor If he
thought that he had answered the
States questions as readily as he had
those Of the defense. DR.. Hubert denied
that he.Wflfully had, Withhold AaEthing.
fso,fpf then r1sSses.aa1a fn1tf{I q = ~