Payette enterprise. (Payette, Canyon Co., Idaho) 1909-1935, 1924-02-21

/ plaintiff, VS.. Austin F. Stonebrake
+ ct al, defendants. Mortgage Fore
closure. Freehafer e. Mcclure, at
: torneys for plaintiff.
t No. 746 Boise-Payette Lumbe
Co corp, plaintiff VS.. c. II. Sar
. gent ct al, defendants. Foreclosure
of Lien. Freehafer & Mcclure, at
/. torneys for plaintiff.
No. TAT. Henry Stokes, plaintiff
I. vs. Armstrong-Pennington Milliner,
Co., corp, defendants Quiet Title
Calvin Keller, attorney for plaintiff
No. 748. In the matter of the in
solvency OF Payette National Bank
, Scatterday & Stone, attorneys.
No. 753 George Frank, plain
tiff, VS.. Frank NJ Gardner, defend
ant. Suit on Promissory Note. Geo.
Donnart, Freehafer & Mcclure, at
torneyd for plaintiff Norris & SUIT
ton, defendant.
NO. 767. In the matter of In
solvency of the Fruitland State
Bank. Dean Driscoll, attorney.
No 1853 Prudence Insurance Co.
OF America, a corp, plaintiff, VS..
William T. Cope ct ux., defendants
Mortgage foreclosure. George
Love, Allen, Winston G Allen, at
torneys for plaintiff. Haynes &
Wilbur, attorneys for defendants
T.. No. $50. Michigan-Idaho Lum-
! Der Co., a corp, plaintiff, VS.. T e
/, City of Payette, a municipal corp,
defendants Separation of agricul-
tural Lands from Municipality.
Haynes & WilbUI, attorneys for
plaintiff. A. OeSsutton, attorney
] for defendant. -
No. 761. Prtdence Insurance Co.
Of America, corp, plaintiff, VS..
Leon H. Patton ct al, defendants,
len, attorneys for plaintiff Free
foreclosure of Mortgage. George
Lowe, Allen, Winston & Allen, at
torneys for plaintiff Freehafer &
Mcclure, attorneys for defendants.
NO: 1853. Janette Kirkendall,
PLAINTIFF, VS.. Harold John Brewster
ct ux., defendants. Mortgage Fore
closure. Freehafer & Mcclure, at
torneys for plaintiff.
No. 767. B. w Grover, plaintiff,
VS.. M M. Hurst. defendant. Suit on
Promissory note.
No. 768. J.W. Whitsell, plain
TIL, VS.. John E. Look, defendant.
Suit on Promissory Note Haynes &
Wilbur, attorney for plaintiff.
Haynes &. Wilbur, attorneys for
plaintiff.
No TIL Myrta A. Douglass
piaintltf, VS.. Alkaline R Signor tet
al, defendants. Mortgage Fore
closure. Haynes G Wilbur, attorneys
for plaintiff.
No. 772. Henry M. Sutfin ct TX,
PLAINTIFF, VS.. Henry Luhr, ct Tx, de-
PENDANTS. Cancellation of Contract.
L. M Lyon, attorneys for plaintiff. |
Norris & Sutton, attorneys for de-
PENDANT.
No 773. Harriet Mable Rydman
plaintiff, VS.. Martin Rydman, de-
PENDANT. Divorce. j. H. Holman,
attorney for plaintiff
No. TIA. Verna Moon, plaintiff,
VS.. Fred Moon, defendant Divorce,
]. H Holman, attorney for plain
tiff
No. IT'S. Ethel B Farrier VS.
Jesse M. FARMER, Defendant. Di-
S0f Ne.- III. NJ fac sso,.en Main
tiff. VS.. Diana C. Komp, ct al, de-
PENDANTS. Mortgage Foreclosure
Freehafer & Mcclure, attorneys for
69uIolle '4lIAedoN " q Injured
for defendants.
No. 779. oliver D. Latham, plain
tiff, VS.. Oliver Bingaman, ct al. de-
defendants. Mortgage Foreclosure.
Norris & Sutton. attorneys for plain
tiff
No. 1871 Bernice Zimmerman,
plaintiff, VS.. Charles L. Zimmerman,
defendant. Divorce.
No. 782. The First National
Bank of Payette, Plaintiff. VS.. D. L.
lngard, defendant Suit on Promis-
sorry Note Norris & Sutton, attor-
neys for plaintiff, Haynes & Will
bur, attorneys for defendant.
No. 1888. Henry Peutz, plaintiff,
VS., Mary E. Burnett ct al, defend
ants. Mortgage Foreclosure.
NO. 1884. Henry Reins, plaintiff,
VS.. Fruitland State Bank ct al, de-
PENDANT Freehafer & Mcclure, at
-orneys for plaintiff Dean Dris-
coll, attorney for defendant. Equit-
able Relief
NO. 7S6. H. D. Jackson, receiver
Payette National Bank, plaintiff, VS..
EDWIN Lauer defendant. Suit on
Prom1ssory Note. Scatterday &
stone, attorneys for plaintiff.
NO 7S7 Dorothy M. Tilden,
plaintiff VS.. B. c. Bertleson ct al,
endants. Mortgage Foreclosure. Z
iff. ~ ~ :
NO. 1888. Federal and Bank of
spokane, plaintiff VS. David Stuart I
u al. defendants Mortgage Fore
losure. Henry R. Newton, Calvin
>eller, attorneys for plaintiff.
NO. 1883. C B Bell, plaintiff, VS.. .
!. Haarman ct al, defendants Suit
n contract. Haynes & Wilbur, at 4
orneys for plaintiff. 4
NO. 100. Fruitland Cooperative
irrigation Co., corp. plaintiff, vs.
RUTLAND State Bank ct al, defend I
nts. Equitable Relief Free 4
afer Mcclure, attorney for plain