San Antonio light. [volume] (San Antonio, Tex.) 1911-1993, 1924-03-27
COURT PROCEEDINGS

Austin. Tex. March a6.-The following
proceedings we're had in the supreme
court Wednesday: LIS.
cd: d. Monroe vs. Jim Gaylor. Milan;
lin Gaylor VS.. ID. Monroe, Milan; Far
mers National Bank Of SteDhenville, e'
al. VS.. Mary II. Daggett, Clay; J. b. Al
lInson vs. jackson Brothers ct al. Cole
man; Wisconsin Texas OIL Company e,
al. VS. Joe Clutter. BeXar; Oran c. Holt
ct uX vs.. The UValde Company, Bexar.
Applications refused: Matte Gallas e'
al ". w. T. Montgomery, Bexar; state
OF Texas vs.. Houston National Bank ct
al. Harris.
Houston National Bank ct al VS.. Board
Of Prison Commissioners. Harris.
Applications dismissed for want OF 1ur-
isdiction: City National Bank of Spur
vs. Rhome Farmer Livestock Commits
sion Company, Tarrant: r. W. kuehn ei
al VS.. Emma Kuehn. San Saba; North
Texas Trust Company ct al. VS.. Emma
Kuehn, San Saba; Mrs. f. W. LeatheroN
Com. Admx VS.. Gulf, Colorado and santa
Fe Railway Company Bell; Frederika
Kanetzy VS.. August Stole ct al, Travis
G. A Meek ct al VS.. Charles A. Weatn-
erred ct al. McLennan: Ben Il. WASH
ington ct al. vs.. William GILES. harris
National Cattle Loan Company VS.. X. q.
Ward. Harris
Motions for rehearing OF causes over
ruled: Mrs. Alice Moore ct n. VS.. Lum-
bermen's Reciprocal Association. Jeffer-
SON
Motions for rehearlng Of applications
overruled: National Surety Company vs..
10. w Rogers ct al, III Paso; j. l..
Higgins vs.. J. i. Walden ct al, Gay
S. j. Carpenter ct al. vs.. A. j. smith
ct al Webb. Locomotive Engineers Mu-
tual Life and Accident Association ct al
VS.. c. E. waterhouse ct al, FL Paso.
Motion to dismiss application over
ruled: Paul Gallas ct al vs. W. l.
Montgomery. Bexar.
Motion TO advance overruled; Leo
.Mallow VS.. Hon. r. \. peasants. Chlet
Justice. ct al (mGndamus).
Motions for rehearing submitted: May
Fasken VS.. Robert Fasken. from Martin;
Mrs. Ellen r. Ross ct al vs. Thomas f.
Haner (Petrie). Harris; f. r. Camel ct
al VS.. City National Bank OF Colorado,
Mitchell.
Motion to advance submitted: Mrs.
osceola f. Tod ct al vs.. City OF Hous-
Causes set for April :. 1894: W. A.
Robbins. tax collector. ct al vs. Lime
stone county ct al, Limestone; II. NJ.
Hubbard ct al vs.. Hamilton county, Ham
ilton.
Minera Ygnaclo Rodriguez Ramas. 5. A.
VS.. Bartlesviile Zinc Company ct al FL
Paso; Luis Terrszas vs.. George NJ.
Holmes ct al, FL Paso: Luis TerTazas vs..
T. J. Donahue ct al IL Paso.
Causes set for May 81, 1894; W. A.
Glasscock VS.. First National Bank OF
san Angelo. Tom Green; 5. G. Davis VS.
J. T. Robson. commissioner: Western
Union Telegraph Company vs. Mrs. y. c.
Brooks. Hunt: n. q. Green ct al vs.. ].
II. windham ct al. Shelby.
Causes set for May IS: William l.
Foley. Inc. vs.. T. ]. Ewing Jr. et al.
Harris; Warren W. HOLSTER ct al vs..
George r. McCamey, Tarrant: !. 7.
Howe ct al vs.. keystone Pipe and supply
Company ct al. Wichita: l.. NJ. Morehear
ct a vs.. Greenvills National Exchange
Bank. Hunt.
Causes set for June 4: Dallas Railway
Company vs.. F J. Geller. Dallas: city
OF Denlson vs.. Municipal Gas Company
Ora yson.
The following causes were decided by
the Supreme Court on reports & the
Commission Of Appeals:
Judgements reversed Hnd cause re-
mand: Frank Ijherto e. al ~ Samuel :.
Sanders et al. BeNar; A. j. Anderson and
Inc. vs., Florence Reich. as
next friend. Tsrrant; c. w. Baker Jr. vs.
". b. Pierre ct al. Fannih